UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K

 

Commission file number: 0-30907

iGo, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code):

(480) 596-0061

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) , and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2009) was approximately $23 million.

 

There were 32,544,025 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding as of March 9, 2010.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

iGo, Inc.
FORM 10-K

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

DISCLOSURE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This report contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate” and other similar statements of expectations identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this report can be found in the “Business”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” sections as well as other sections of this report and include, without limitation, statements concerning our expectations regarding our anticipated revenue, gross profit, gross margin, and related expenses for 2010 as well as our anticipated cash flows in 2010; our strategy, including but not limited to, our intentions to continue to develop and introduce new products and technologies, aggressively file patents and expand our intellectual property position, market non-power accessories, and market and expand our “green” power product offerings to address the problem of “vampire” power as well as the expected benefits that will result from our efforts; that our customers may continue to curtail or suspend capital spending; that we will not receive any significant orders from Targus after December 31, 2009 and that sales to RadioShack will continue to decline in 2010; that we will deconsolidate Mission Technology Group from our consolidated financial statements effective January 1, 2010; our intention to retain cash balances in foreign countries; our anticipated penetration of the wireless carrier, dealer/agent, and distributor markets; the expected growth in sales of power products for high-power mobile electronic devices; expectations regarding future customer product orders; our reliance on distributors and resellers for the distribution and sale of our products; beliefs relating to our competitive advantages and the market need for our products; our belief that our present vendors have sufficient capacity to meet our supply requirements; the expected availability and sufficiency of cash and liquidity; expected market and industry trends; beliefs relating to our distribution capabilities and brand identity; expectations regarding the success of new product introductions; the anticipated strength, and ability to protect, our intellectual property portfolio; our intentions to continue and develop power products in existing and new markets; our intentions to recruit a broad base of retailers and distributors for our tip technology; our expectations that existing and new distributor, reseller and retailer distribution networks will help us diversify and stabilize our customer base; our intention to continue to make capital expenditures and pursue opportunities to acquire businesses, products and technologies; our expectation that a small number of customers will continue to represent a substantial percentage of our sales including specifically, but not limited to, RadioShack; expectations about inventory levels we will be required to maintain and future sales returns; our expectations about competition; our long term goals to establish an inventory standard for all mobile electronic power products based on our tip technology; the impact of the current economic rescission on our industry in general, and specifically on the Company; trends in key operating metrics, including days outstanding in accounts receivable and inventory turns; the possibility that we may issue additional shares of stock; our intention and ability to hold marketable securities to maturity; our intentions about employing hedging strategies; that we may repurchase shares of our common stock; and our expectations regarding the outcome and anticipated impact of various legal proceedings in which we are involved. These forward-looking statements are based largely on our management’s expectations and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance, achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed herein under the heading “Risk Factors” and those set forth in other sections of this report and in other reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this report will prove to be accurate. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, or any facts, events, or circumstances after the date hereof that may bear upon forward-looking statements.

 

iGo^® and iGo Green^® are registered trademarks of iGo, Inc. or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

 

 

Our Company

 

We are a leading provider of innovative products and power management solutions for the electronics industry. We use our proprietary technology to design and develop products that make electronic devices more efficient and cost effective, thus enabling users higher utilization of their electronic devices. We also utilize our proprietary technology to design and develop products that make electronic devices more environmentally-friendly or “green,” enabling users to reduce electronic waste and standby or “vampire” power. We believe our competitive advantages include our innovative designs and multi-function capabilities of our products, and our distribution, wireless carrier, and retail relationships.

 

We primarily sell our products through retailers, such as RadioShack Corporation; resellers, such as Superior Communications and Ingram Micro, Inc.; wireless carriers, such as AT&T; and directly to end users through our iGo brand website, www.igo.com. In the past, we sold power accessories primarily to private label resellers and original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs.

 

Our power products, marketed under our iGo and iGo Green brands, include our range of green AC, DC, combination AC/DC, and battery-powered universal power adapters, as well as our newly developed line of green surge protectors. Our combination AC/DC power adapters allow users to charge a variety of their mobile electronic devices from AC power sources located in a home, office or hotel room, as well as DC power sources located in automobiles, planes and trains. Our battery-powered universal power adapters allow users to charge a variety of their mobile electronic devices when they do not have access to an AC or DC power source. Each of these adapters utilizes our interchangeable tip technology, which allows the use of a single power adapter with interchangeable tips to charge a variety of mobile electronic devices, including portable computers, mobile phones, MP3 players, smartphones, PDAs, portable gaming consoles and other handheld devices. When our power adapters are combined with a multiple output connector accessory, such as the iGo USB connector or iGo power splitter, the user can also simultaneously charge multiple mobile electronic devices. The use of one charging solution increases end-user convenience and minimizes electronic waste as interchangeable tip solutions require fewer resources to build, ship, inventory and dispose of.

 

In addition to our traditional power products, we recently launched an energy-efficient environmentally-friendly product line. Various solutions currently on the market focus on mitigating vampire power through manual applications. For example, other products offer technology that reduces vampire power by manually switching the power product on or off, completely eliminating the electricity source to all devices plugged into the power-strip. Our patent-pending green technology virtually eliminates vampire power in a more convenient manner, by automatically powering down outlets when not in use and powering back up again when devices need power. This feature eliminates the need for users to continuously switch the product on and off and reduces vampire power by up to 85%. Initially, our green technology is featured in laptop chargers and surge protectors, yet we believe the market opportunity for green products is vast and that our technology has the versatility to play an important role in future green power solutions.

 

We were formed as a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Delaware in May 1995, and were converted to a Delaware corporation by a merger effected in August 1996, in which we were the surviving entity. We changed our name from Electronics Accessory Specialists International, Inc. to Mobility Electronics, Inc. on July 23, 1998 and on May 21, 2008 we changed our name to iGo, Inc. Our principal executive office is located at 17800 N. Perimeter Drive, Suite 200, Scottsdale, Arizona 85255, and our telephone number is (480) 596-0061.

 

We have three operating business segments, consisting of the High-Power Group, Low-Power Group and Connectivity Group. For additional information regarding revenue, operating results and assets by business segment, product type and geographic region, see Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our Industry

 

Over the past two decades, technological advancements in the electronics industry have greatly expanded mobile device capabilities. Mobile electronic devices, which are used extensively for both business and personal purposes, include portable computers, mobile phones, smartphones, portable digital assistants (PDAs), handheld devices, digital cameras, portable DVD players, MP3 players, and portable game consoles. The popularity of these devices is benefiting from reductions in size, weight and cost and improvements in functionality, storage capacity and reliability. In addition, advances in wireless connectivity technologies, such as Bluetooth^® wireless technology and Wi-Fi, have enabled remote access to data networks and the Internet.

 

Increased functionality and the ability to access and manage information remotely are driving the proliferation of mobile electronic devices and applications. As the work force becomes more mobile and spends more time away from traditional work settings, users have sought out and become reliant on tools that provide management of critical information and access to wireless voice and data networks. Each of these mobile electronic devices needs to be powered and connected when in the home, the office, or on the road, and can be accessorized, representing an opportunity for one or more of our products.

 

Our products support mobile electronic devices in several market categories.

 

 

As mobile electronic devices gain widespread acceptance, users will continue to confront limitations on their use, driven by such things as battery life, charging flexibility, compatibility issues, data input challenges and performance requirements. Furthermore, as users seek to manage multiple devices in their daily routine, the limitations of any one of these functions may be exacerbated.

 

Mobile electronic device users usually require the use of their devices while away from their home or office. Many mobile electronic devices offer designs and form factors that support portability and travel comfort; however, these mobile devices have limited battery life, which results in the need to frequently connect to a power source to operate the device or recharge the battery. A number of factors limit the efficient use and charging of these devices:

 

 

Mobile electronic device users, who usually have limited available space in their briefcase or luggage, desire solutions that make their mobile experience more convenient. We believe this creates the need for universal power adapters that have the ability to simultaneously charge multiple mobile electronic devices.

 

Vampire power results from devices that continue to consume power, even when they are idle or shut off. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that vampire power accounts for more than $10 billion in annual energy costs in the United States alone. In addition to tangible dollar costs, vampire power negatively impacts the environment by wasting vast amounts of electricity. Furthermore, according to the Global System for Mobile Communications Association or “GSMA,” discarded chargers account for approximately 51,000 tons of waste annually. We believe this creates the need for power solutions that have the ability to drastically reduce vampire power and electronic waste.

 

Our Solutions

 

Our innovative power solutions eliminate the need for mobile electronic device users to carry multiple power adapters to operate and charge their devices. Our AC/DC combination power adapters work with any available power source, including the AC wall outlet in a home, office or hotel room, or the DC cigarette lighter plug in an automobile, airplane, or train. Our battery-powered universal power adapters allow users to charge a variety of their mobile electronic devices when they do not have access to an AC or DC power source. Our tip technology allows a user to carry a few lightweight interchangeable tips in combination with a single adapter to charge a variety of devices, including a substantial portion of the portable computers, mobile phones, smartphones, PDAs, and other mobile electronic devices currently in the market. Further, device users can simultaneously charge multiple devices by using a single adapter and the appropriate interchangeable tips with our optional iGo USB connector or iGo power splitter accessories. Our new patent-pending green technology addresses broad applications relating to power supplies for office equipment, personal electronics and appliances, and covers the only power circuit technology that virtually eliminates vampire power automatically. Our core power products are inherently “green” as they eliminate the need for consumers to dispose of old adapters with the purchase of each new electronic device. Instead, our products enable the consumer to simply purchase a small, inexpensive tip capable of working with existing adapters, thus substantially reducing electronic waste.

 

Our Strategy

 

We intend to capitalize on our current strategic position in the mobile electronic device market by continuing to introduce innovative power solution products that suit the needs of a broad range of users of these devices, including power solutions that are green in nature. It is our goal to be a market leader in providing unique, innovative and green power solutions to mobile users. Elements of our strategy include:

 

Continue To Develop Innovative Products.  We have a history of designing and developing highly differentiated products to serve the needs and enhance the experience of mobile electronic device users. We intend to continue to develop and market a broad range of highly differentiated power and complementary products that address additional markets in which we choose to compete. We also intend to protect our intellectual property position in these markets by aggressively filing for additional patents on an ongoing basis and, as necessary, pursuing infringers of our intellectual property.

 

Integration of Green Technology in New Power Solutions.  The integration of our green technology in new products, such as surge protectors, gives us the opportunity to expand into channels that we have not traditionally addressed, such as the home improvement market. Further, the possibility extends directly into the home and commercial building markets through the integration of our green technology directly into the AC outlets found in the home and office.

 

Market Complementary Non-Power Accessories.  We intend to market a variety of non-power accessories, some of which may be manufactured by other companies, that are complementary to our power products. Our strategy is to market a broad assortment of products that accessorize mobile electronic devices under the brand name “iGo.”

Broaden Distribution of iGo Branded Product.  To expand the market availability of our iGo and iGo Green branded products, we plan to develop relationships with a broader set of retailers and wireless carriers, some of whom may be served through distribution partners. We expect that these relationships will allow us to diversify our customer base, add stability and decrease our traditional reliance upon a limited number of private label resellers. We also expect that these relationships will significantly increase the availability and exposure of our products, particularly among large national and international retailers and wireless carriers.

 

Our Products

 

We provide a range of power products designed to satisfy the needs of the electronic device user while traveling, at home or in the office. The following is a description of our primary products by category, which are sold under our iGo and iGo Green brands.

 

Power Products.  We offer a range of universal AC, DC, combination AC/DC and battery-powered adapters that are designed for use with portable computers, as well as a variety of other low power mobile electronic devices, including mobile phones, smartphones, PDAs, digital cameras, MP3 players, and portable game consoles.

 

 

Accessories.  In the past we have also marketed a number of mobile device accessories such as monitor stands, portable computer stands and foldable keyboards. Sales of these products represented approximately 1%, 1%, and 4% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

 

Expansion and Docking Products.  In April 2007, we sold the expansion and docking business to Mission Technology Group (“Mission”). Mission’s results of operations are consolidated with ours because Mission is obligated to repay the promissory notes it issued to us in connection with this sale, and we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of this variable interest entity. Effective January 1, 2010, we have determined we will no longer consolidate the results of Mission. Mission offers a variety of PCI slot expansion products for portable computers, desktop computers and servers. For more information, see Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Recent Developments, and — Critical Accounting

Policies and Estimates, Variable Interest Entities.” Sales of expansion and docking products represented approximately 12%, 9%, and 9% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

We market and sell our products on a worldwide basis to retailers, resellers, distributors, wireless carriers and directly to end users through our iGo.com website. Our sales organization is primarily aligned with our core retail and distribution channels and geographies throughout North America and Europe. During 2009, approximately 59% of our sales were through retailers and distributors and approximately 27% of our sales were through private label resellers and OEMs.

 

Our total global revenue consisted of the following regional results: North American sales of $49.8 million, or 90% of our consolidated revenue; European sales of $4.6 million, or 8% of our consolidated revenue; and Asia Pacific sales of $1.1 million, or 2% of our consolidated revenue.

 

We have implemented a variety of marketing activities to market our family of products including participation in major trade shows, key distribution catalogs, distribution promotions, reseller and information technology manager advertising, on-line advertising and banner ads, direct mail and bundle advertisements with retail and distribution channel partners and cooperative advertising with our retail partners. In addition, we pursue a public relations program to educate the market regarding our products.

 

Customers

 

In March 2009, Targus notified us of its intent not to renew our distribution agreement, which expired in May 2009. Accordingly, in the future, we expect that we will be even more dependent upon a relatively small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue, including most notably RadioShack. We intend to develop relationships with a broader set of retailers and wireless carriers to expand the market availability of our iGo and iGo Green branded products. Our goal is that these relationships will allow us to diversify our customer base, add stability and decrease our traditional reliance upon a limited number of private label resellers. These relationships could significantly increase the availability and exposure of our products, particularly among large national and international retailers and wireless carriers, however we give no assurance we could substantially replace the lost Targus revenue.

 

We sell to distributors, such as Superior Communications, resellers, such as Microcel, retailers, such as RadioShack, private label resellers, such as Targus through the first half of 2009 and Belkin currently, and directly to end users through our iGo.com website. Sales to Superior Communications, Microcel, RadioShack, Targus and Belkin together accounted for 74% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 81% for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 66% for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our distributors sell a wide range of our products to value-added resellers, system integrators, cataloguers, major retail outlets and certain OEM fulfillment outlets worldwide. RadioShack, in particular, accounted for 38% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009. In addition, in spite of the loss of Targus as a customer during the middle of 2009, Targus accounted for 21% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009. The loss of RadioShack or any of our remaining other major customers, would likely have a material adverse effect on our business. No customer other than Targus or RadioShack accounted for greater than 10% of sales for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

For our distribution and retail customers, we build product and maintain inventory at various third-party warehouses that are under our control until these customers place, and we fulfill, purchase orders for this product. For private label resellers, we build product to the private label resellers’ orders, who take possession of the inventory upon delivery to a freight forwarder. For wireless carriers, we retain ownership of inventory until the product sells through to consumers.

 

As is generally the practice in our industry, a portion of our sales to distributors and retailers is generally under terms that provide for stock balancing return privileges and price protection. Accordingly, we make a provision for estimated sales returns and other allowances related to those sales. Returns, which are netted against our reported revenue, were less than 1% of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Also, as is generally the practice in our industry, our OEM and private-label reseller customers only have return rights in the

event that our product is defective. Accordingly, we make a provision for estimated defective product warranty claims for these customers. Defective product warranty claims were less than 1% of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Backlog

 

Our backlog at February 16, 2010 was approximately $6.0 million, compared with backlog of approximately $9.7 million at February 24, 2009. Backlog includes orders confirmed with a purchase order for products scheduled to be shipped within 90 days to customers with approved credit status. Because of the generally short cycle between order and shipment and because of occasional customer changes in delivery schedules and order cancellations (which are made without significant penalty), we do not believe that our backlog, as of any particular date, is necessarily indicative of actual net sales for any future period.

 

Research and Development

 

Our research and development efforts focus primarily on enhancing our current products and developing innovative new products to address a variety of mobile electronic device needs and requirements. We work with customers, prospective customers and outsource partners to identify and implement new solutions intended to meet the current and future needs of the markets we serve.

 

As of December 31, 2009, our research and development group consisted of 15 people who are responsible for hardware and software design and product testing, which included six research and development personnel employed at Mission as of December 31, 2009. Electrical design services are provided to us by several of our outsource partners under the supervision of our in-house research and development group. Amounts spent on research and development for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $3.0 million, $3.5 million, and $5.2 million, respectively.

 

Manufacturing and Logistics

 

In order to manufacture our products cost-effectively, we have implemented a strategy to outsource substantially all of the manufacturing services for our products. Our internal activities are focused on design, low-volume manufacturing and quality testing and our outsourced manufacturing providers are focused on high-volume manufacturing and logistics.

 

Our family of universal power products and surge protector products are currently manufactured in China. In addition to providing manufacturing services, a number of these companies also provide us with some level of design and development services.

 

We purchase the principal components of our products from outside vendors. The terms of supply contracts are negotiated by us or our manufacturing partners with each vendor. We believe that our present vendors have sufficient capacity to meet our supply requirements and that alternative production sources for most components are generally available without interruption, however, several vendors are sole sourced. In order to ensure timely delivery of products to customers, from time to time, we issue letters of authorization to our suppliers that authorize them to secure long lead components in advance of purchase orders for products. Further information about commitments and contingencies relating to letters of authorization is contained in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

We employ the services of an outsource logistics company to efficiently manage the packaging and shipment of our iGo and iGo Green branded products to our various retail and distribution channels. The majority of our private-label products are shipped by our outsource manufacturers to our private-label reseller customers or to their fulfillment hubs.

 

Competition

 

The market for our products is intensely competitive, subject to rapid change and sensitive to new product introductions or enhancements and marketing efforts by industry participants. The principal competitive factors affecting the markets for our product offerings include corporate and product reputation, innovation with frequent

product enhancement, breadth of integrated product line, product design, functionality and features, product quality, performance, ease-of-use, support and price. Although we believe that our products compete favorably with respect to such factors, there can be no assurance that we can maintain our competitive position against current or potential competitors, especially those with greater financial, marketing, service, support, technical or other competitive resources. However, we believe that our innovative products, coupled with our strategic relationships with private-label resellers, retailers, resellers, distributors, and wireless carriers provide us with a competitive advantage in the marketplace.

 

Our power products primarily compete with products offered by low-cost manufacturers of model-specific adapters and specialized third-party mobile computing accessory companies, including American Power Conversion, Belkin, Comarco, Lind, and RRC Power Solutions. In addition, we compete with the internal design efforts of some of our customers.

 

Proprietary Rights

 

We seek to establish and maintain our proprietary rights in our technology and products through the use of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secret laws. We have a program to file applications for and obtain patents, copyrights, and trademarks in the United States and in selected foreign countries where we believe filing for such protection is appropriate. We also seek to maintain our trade secrets and confidential information by nondisclosure policies and through the use of appropriate confidentiality agreements. As of February 23, 2010, we held approximately 244 patents and patents pending worldwide relating to our power technology, including our new green technology. There can be no assurance, however, that the rights we have obtained can be successfully enforced against infringing products in every jurisdiction. Although we believe the protection afforded by our patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets has value, the rapidly changing technology in our industry and uncertainties in the legal process make our future success dependent primarily on the innovative skills, technological expertise, and management abilities of our employees rather than on the protection afforded by patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws.

 

Some of our products are also designed to include software or other intellectual property licensed from third parties. While it may be necessary in the future to seek or renew licenses relating to various aspects of our products, we believe, based upon past experience and standard industry practice that such licenses generally could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Nonetheless, there can be no assurance that the necessary licenses would be available on acceptable terms, if at all. Our inability to obtain certain licenses or other rights or to obtain such licenses or rights on favorable terms, or the need to engage in litigation regarding these matters, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. Moreover, inclusion in our products of software or other intellectual property licensed from third parties on a nonexclusive basis may limit our ability to protect our proprietary rights in our products.

 

There can be no assurance that our patents and other proprietary rights will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented; that others will not assert intellectual property rights to technologies that are relevant to us; or that our rights will give us a competitive advantage. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2009 we had 52 full-time employees, 44 located in the United States, 4 located in Asia and 4 located in Europe, including 10 employed in operations, 9 in engineering, 22 in sales and marketing and 11 in administration. We engage temporary employees from time to time to augment our full time employees, generally in operations. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe we have good relationships with our employees. Mission had 29 full-time employees at December 31, 2009.

 

Available Information

 

Our website is www.igo.com. Information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this report or any other filing we make with the SEC. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Through a link on the Investor Relations section of the corporate page of our website, we make available the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable, after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All such filings are available free of charge.

 

 

This section highlights specific risks that could affect us and our business. You should carefully consider each of the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on the information currently known to us, we believe that the following information identifies the most significant risk factors affecting us. However, the risks and uncertainties that we face are not limited to those described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business.

 

If any of the following risks and uncertainties develops into actual events or the circumstances described in the risks and uncertainties occur, these events or circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. These events could also have a negative effect on the trading price of our securities.

 

Risks Related To Our Business

 

We depend on large purchases from a significant customer, RadioShack, and any loss, cancellation or delay in purchases by this customer could cause a shortfall in revenue, excess inventory and inventory holding or obsolescence charges.

 

We have historically derived a substantial portion of our revenue from a relatively small number of customers. For example, Targus and RadioShack together comprised 59% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009. More recently, as a result of the discontinuance of our relationship with Targus, we are deriving an even larger portion of our revenue from RadioShack. For the year ended December 31, 2009, RadioShack alone represented 38% of our revenue. RadioShack does not have minimum purchase requirements and can stop purchasing our products at any time and with very short notice. In addition, including RadioShack, most of our customer agreements are short term and non-exclusive and provide for purchases on a purchase order basis. We expect that RadioShack will continue to represent a substantial percentage of our sales. If RadioShack reduces, delays or cancels orders with us, and we are not able to sell our products to new customers at comparable levels, our revenue could decline significantly and could result in excess inventory and inventory holding or obsolescence charges. In addition, any difficulty in collecting amounts due from RadioShack would negatively impact our result of operations and working capital.

 

Our success is largely dependent upon our ability to expand and diversify our customer base, while simultaneously continuing to retain and build our relationship with RadioShack.

 

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue from RadioShack and any adverse change in our relationship with RadioShack would have a material adverse effect on our business. If RadioShack discontinued purchasing our products, our revenues and net income would decline significantly. For example, sales to RadioShack for the year ended December 31, 2009 declined 17% as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 and we expect that sales to RadioShack will continue to decline in 2010 relative to sales generated from RadioShack in previous years. Our success will depend upon our continued ability to retain and build upon our relationship with RadioShack, while simultaneously generating relationships with new customers, particularly retail customers willing to sell our products to consumers under our iGo brand.

 

Although we are attempting to expand our customer base, we cannot assure you that we will be able to retain our largest customer, RadioShack, or that we will be able to attract additional customers, or that our customers will continue to buy our products in the same amounts as in prior years. The loss of RadioShack, any reduction or interruption in sales to RadioShack, our inability to successfully develop relationships with additional customers or future price concessions that we may have to make, could significantly harm our business.

If our revenue is not sufficient to absorb our expenses, we will not be profitable in the future.

 

We have experienced significant operating losses since inception and, as of December 31, 2009, have an accumulated deficit of $131 million. We intend to make expenditures on an ongoing basis to support our operations, primarily from cash generated from operations and, if available, from lines of credit, as we develop and introduce new products and expand into new markets. If we do not achieve revenue growth sufficient to absorb our planned expenses, we will experience additional losses in future periods. In addition, there can be no assurance that we will achieve or sustain profitability.

 

Our future success is dependent on market acceptance of our iGo branded power products, particularly in light of the loss of the Targus relationship. If acceptance of our iGo branded power products does not continue to grow, we will not be able to increase or sustain our revenue, and our business will be severely harmed. If we do not achieve widespread market acceptance of our iGo branded power products and technology, including our new green technology, we may not maintain our existing revenue or achieve anticipated revenue. For example, we currently derive a material portion of our revenue from the sale of our iGo branded power products. These power products, particularly our new green power products, represent a relatively new product category in the mobile electronics industry. We anticipate that a material portion of our revenue in the foreseeable future will be derived from our family of iGo branded power products and similar power products in this relatively new market category that we are currently developing or plan to develop. We can give no assurance that this market category will develop sufficiently to cover our expenses and costs or that we will be able to develop similar power products. Moreover, our power products may not achieve widespread market acceptance if:

 

 

In addition, the retail version of our universal power adapter products includes a feature that allows a single version of these products to be used with almost any mobile electronic device. If mobile electronic device manufacturers choose to design and manufacture their products in such a way as to limit the use of universal devices with their devices, it could reduce the applicability of a universal power adapter product and limit market acceptance of our power products at the retail level.

 

Our operating results are subject to significant fluctuations, and if our results are worse than expected, our stock price could fall.

 

Our operating results have fluctuated in the past, and may continue to fluctuate in the future. It is likely that in some future quarter or quarters our operating results will be below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. If this happens, the market price for our common stock may decline significantly. The factors that may cause our operating results to fall short of expectations include:

 

 

 

Many of these factors are beyond our control. For these reasons, you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons and short-term fluctuations of our financial results to forecast our future long-term performance.

 

Increased focus by consumer electronics retailers on their own private label brands could cause us to lose shelf space with our existing retail customers and make it more difficult to have our products assorted at new retail customers.

 

We believe there is an increasing focus by consumer electronics retailers, such as RadioShack and Best Buy, to concentrate an increasing portion of their product assortments within their own private label products. Our largest customer, RadioShack, sells its own private label brand of power products that compete directly with our power products. These private label lines compete directly with our product lines and may receive prominent positioning on the retail floor by these retailers. Competition has been intense in recent years and is expected to continue. Failure to appropriately respond to these trends or to offer effective sales incentives and marketing programs to our customers could reduce our ability to secure adequate shelf space at our retail customers and adversely affect our financial performance.

 

The average selling prices of our products may decrease over their sales cycles, especially upon the introduction of new products, which may negatively affect our gross margins.

 

Our products may experience a reduction in the average selling prices over their respective sales cycles. Further, as we introduce new or next generation products, sales prices of previous generation products may decline substantially. In order to sell products that have a falling average selling price and maintain margins at the same time, we need to continually reduce product and manufacturing costs. To manage manufacturing costs, we must collaborate with our third-party manufacturers to engineer the most cost-effective design for our products. There can be no assurances we will be successful in our efforts to reduce these costs. In order to do so, we must carefully manage the price paid for components used in our products as well as manage our freight and inventory costs to reduce overall product costs. If we are unable to reduce the cost of older products as newer products are introduced, our average gross margins may decline.

 

Increased reliance upon RadioShack, as well as other distributors and resellers, for the sale of our products will subject us to additional risks, and the failure to adequately manage these risks could have a material adverse impact on our operating results.

 

The inability to accurately forecast the timing and volume of orders for sales of products to resellers and distributors during any given quarter could adversely affect operating results for such quarter and, potentially, for future periods. For example, if we underestimate sales, we will not be able to fill orders on a timely basis, which could cause customer dissatisfaction and loss of future business. Conversely, if we overestimate sales, we will experience increased costs from inventory storage, waste, and obsolescence.

 

The loss of RadioShack, or any other large reseller or distributor customers, would materially harm our business. While we currently have a limited number of reseller and distributor agreements, none of these customers are obligated to purchase products from us. Consequently, any reseller or distributor could cease doing business with us at any time. Our dependence upon RadioShack along with a few other resellers and distributors results in a significant concentration of credit risk, thus a substantial portion of our trade receivables outstanding from time to

time are often concentrated among a limited number of customers. In addition, many of these customers also have or distribute competing products. If RadioShack, or our other reseller and distributor customers, elect to increase the marketing of competing products or reduce the marketing of our products, our ability to grow our business will be negatively impacted and will impair our revenue.

 

Additional risks associated with our reseller and distributor business include the following:

 

 

Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

If we fail to continue to introduce new products and product enhancements that achieve broad market acceptance on a timely basis, we will not be able to compete effectively, and we will be unable to increase or maintain our revenue.

 

The market for our products is highly competitive and in general is characterized by rapid technological advances, changing customer needs and evolving industry standards. If we fail to continue to introduce new products and product enhancements that achieve broad market acceptance on a timely basis, we will not be able to compete effectively, and we will be unable to increase or maintain our revenue. Our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to:

 

 

We may not be successful in developing and marketing, on a timely and cost-effective basis, either enhancements to existing products or new products that respond to technological advances and satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer needs. If we fail to introduce or sell innovative new products, our operating results may suffer. In addition, if new industry standards emerge that we do not anticipate or adapt to, our products could be rendered obsolete and our business could be materially harmed. Alternatively, any delay in the development of technology upon which our products are based could result in our inability to introduce new products as planned. The success and marketability of technology and products developed by others is beyond our control.

 

We have experienced delays in releasing new products in the past, which resulted in lower quarterly revenue than expected. Further, our efforts to develop new and similar products could be delayed due to unanticipated manufacturing requirements and costs. Delays in product development and introduction could result in:

 

 

 

Acquisitions could have negative consequences, which could harm our business.

 

We have acquired, and intend to continue to pursue opportunities to acquire businesses, products or technologies that complement or expand our current capabilities. For example, in 2006 we acquired substantially all of the assets of Think Outside, Inc., a developer and marketer of foldable keyboards and other accessories for mobile handheld devices and, in 2007, made the determination to no longer develop and market these keyboard products. Additional acquisitions could require significant capital infusions and could involve many risks including, but not limited to, the following:

 

 

Our failure to manage these risks and challenges could materially harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Further, if we do not successfully address these challenges in a timely manner, we may not fully realize all of the anticipated benefits or synergies on which the value of a transaction was based. Future transactions could cause our financial results to differ from expectations of market analysts or investors for any given quarter, which could, in turn, cause a decline in our stock price.

 

If we fail to protect our intellectual property our business and ability to compete could suffer.

 

Our success and ability to compete are dependent upon our internally developed technology and know-how. We rely primarily on a combination of patent protection, copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, nondisclosure

agreements and technical security measures to protect our proprietary rights. While we have certain patents and patents pending, including pending patents relating to our new green power technology, there can be no assurance that patents pending or future patent applications will be issued or that, if issued, those patents will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that rights granted thereunder will provide meaningful protection or other commercial advantage to us. Moreover, there can be no assurance that any patent rights will be upheld in the future or that we will be able to preserve any of our other intellectual property rights.

 

We typically enter into confidentiality, non-compete or invention assignment agreements with our key employees, distributors, customers and potential customers, and limit access to, and distribution of, our product design documentation and other proprietary information. There can be no assurance that our confidentiality agreements, confidentiality procedures, noncompetition agreements or other factors will be adequate to deter misappropriation or independent third-party development of our technology or to prevent an unauthorized third-party from obtaining or using information that we regard as proprietary. Litigation efforts may be necessary in the future to defend our intellectual property rights and would likely result in substantial cost to, and division of efforts by, us.

 

We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims that are costly to defend and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.

 

The laws of some foreign countries do not protect or enforce proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. In addition, under current law, certain patent applications filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office before November 29, 2000 may be maintained in secrecy until a patent is issued. Patent applications filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office on or after November 29, 2000, as well as patent applications filed in foreign countries, may be published some time after filing but prior to issuance. The right to a patent in the United States is attributable to the first to invent, not the first to file a patent application. We cannot be sure that our products or technologies do not infringe patents that may be granted in the future pursuant to pending patent applications or that our products do not infringe any patents or proprietary rights of third parties. In the event that any relevant claims of third-party patents are upheld as valid and enforceable, we could be prevented from selling our products or could be required to obtain licenses from the owners of such patents or be required to redesign our products to avoid infringement. There can be no assurance that such licenses would be available or, if available, would be on terms acceptable to us or that we would be successful in any attempts to redesign our products or processes to avoid infringement. Our failure to obtain these licenses or to redesign our products would have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

There can be no assurance that our competitors will not independently develop technology similar to our existing proprietary rights. We expect that our products will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. There can be no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against us in the future or, if infringement claims are asserted, that such claims will be resolved in our favor. Any such claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms favorable to us, if at all. In addition, litigation may be necessary in the future to protect our trade secrets or other intellectual property rights, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources. For example, at the beginning of 2008 we settled a patent infringement lawsuit with American Power Conversion Corporation. We incurred significant costs in this lawsuit and many of our executive officers and employees devoted substantial time and effort to this lawsuit.

 

We outsource the manufacturing and fulfillment of our products, which limits our control of the manufacturing process and may cause a delay in our ability to fill orders.

 

Most of our products are produced under contract manufacturing arrangements with several manufacturers in China, Taiwan and the United States. Our reliance on third-party manufacturers exposes us to risks that are not in our control, which could negatively impact our results of operations and working capital. Any termination of or significant disruption in our relationship with our manufacturers may prevent us from filling customer orders in a

timely manner, as we generally do not maintain large inventories of our products, and will negatively impact our revenue.

 

We source our products from independent manufacturers who purchase components and other raw materials. Our use of contract manufacturers reduces control over product quality and manufacturing yields and costs. We depend upon our contract manufacturers to deliver products that are free from defects, competitive in cost and in compliance with our specifications and delivery schedules. Moreover, although arrangements with such manufacturers may contain provisions for warranty obligations on the part of contract manufacturers, we remain primarily responsible to our customers for warranty obligations. Disruption in supply, a significant increase in the cost of the assembly of our products, failure of a contract manufacturer to remain competitive in price, the failure of a contract manufacturer to comply with any of our procurement needs or the financial failure or bankruptcy of a contract manufacturer could delay or interrupt our ability to manufacture or deliver our products to customers on a timely basis. In addition, regulatory agencies and legislatures in various countries, including the United States, have undertaken reviews of product safety, and various proposals for additional, more stringent laws and regulations are under consideration. Current or future laws or regulations may become effective in various jurisdictions in which we currently operate and may increase our costs and disrupt our business operations.

 

We generally provide our third-party contract manufacturers with a rolling forecast of demand which they use to determine our material and component requirements. Lead times for ordering materials and components vary significantly and depend on various factors, such as the specific supplier, contract terms and supply and demand for a component at a given time. Some of our components have long lead times. For example, certain electronic components used in our high-power adapter products have lead times that range from six to ten weeks. If our forecasts are less than our actual requirements, our contract manufacturers may be unable to manufacture products in a timely manner. If our forecasts are too high, our contract manufacturers will be unable to use the components they have purchased on our behalf, which may require us to purchase the components from them before they are used in the manufacture of our products.

 

We rely on contract fulfillment providers to warehouse our iGo branded finished goods inventory and to ship our iGo branded products to our customers. We do not have long-term contracts with our fulfillment providers. Any termination of or significant disruption in our relationship with our fulfillment providers may prevent customer orders from being fulfilled in a timely manner, as it would require that we relocate our finished goods inventory to another warehouse facility and arrange for shipment of products to our customers.

 

Our reliance on sole sources for key components may inhibit our ability to meet customer demand.

 

The principal components of our products are purchased from outside vendors. Several of these vendors are our sole source of supply. We do not have long-term supply agreements with the manufacturers of these components.

 

We depend upon our suppliers to deliver components that are free from defects, competitive in functionality and cost and in compliance with our specifications and delivery schedules. Disruption in supply, a significant increase in the cost of one or more components, failure of a supplier to remain competitive in functionality or price, the failure of a supplier to comply with any of our procurement needs or the financial failure or bankruptcy of a supplier could delay or interrupt our ability to manufacture or deliver our products to customers on a timely basis.

 

Any termination of or significant disruption in our relationship with our suppliers may prevent us from filling customer orders in a timely manner as we generally do not maintain large inventories of components or products. In the event that a termination or disruption were to occur, we would have to find and qualify an alternative source. The time it would take to complete this process would vary based upon the size of the supplier base and the complexity of the component or product and could divert our management resources and be costly. Delays could range from as little as a few days to several months, and, in some cases, a suitable alternative may not be available at all.

 

We may not be able to adequately manage our anticipated growth, which could impair our efficiency and negatively impact operations.

 

Our success depends on our ability to manage growth effectively. If we do not effectively manage this growth, we may not be able to operate efficiently or maintain the quality of our products. Either outcome could materially

and adversely affect our operating results. As we continue to develop new products and bring them to market, we will be required to manage multiple projects, including the design and development of products and their transition to high volume manufacturing. This could place a significant strain on our operational, financial and managerial resources and personnel, our management information systems, and our operational and financial controls. To effectively manage our growth we must:

 

 

Our inventory management is complex and failure to properly manage inventory growth may result in excess or obsolete inventory, the write-down of which may negatively affect our operating results.

 

Our inventory management is complex as we are required to balance the need to maintain strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive lead times against the risk of inventory overstock and obsolescence because of rapidly changing technology and customer requirements. In addition, the need to carefully manage our inventory is likely to increase as we expect to acquire additional customers who will likely require us to maintain certain minimum levels of inventory on their behalf, as well as provide them with inventory return privileges. Our customers may also increase orders during periods of product shortages, cancel orders if their inventory is too high, or delay orders in anticipation of new products. They may adjust their orders in response to the supply of our products and the products of our competitors that are available to them and in response to seasonal fluctuations in end-user demand. If we ultimately determine that we have excess or obsolete inventory, we may have to reduce our prices and write-down inventory, which in turn could result in reduced operating results.

 

We have experienced returns of our products, which could in the future harm our reputation and negatively impact our operating results.

 

In the past, some of our customers have returned products to us because the product did not meet their expectations, specifications or requirements. These returns were less than 1% of revenue for each of the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. It is likely that we will experience some level of returns in the future and, as our business grows, this level may be more difficult to estimate. A portion of our sales to distributors is generally under terms that provide for certain stock balancing privileges. Under the stock balancing programs, some distributors are permitted to return up to 15% of their prior quarter’s purchases, provided that they place a new order for equal or greater dollar value of the amount returned.

 

Also, returns may adversely affect our relationship with those customers and may harm our reputation. This could cause us to lose potential customers and business in the future. We record a reserve for future returns at the time revenue is recognized. We believe the reserve is adequate given our historical level of returns. If returns increase, however, our reserve may not be sufficient and operating results could be negatively affected.

 

We may have design quality and performance issues with our products that may adversely affect our reputation and our operating results.

 

A number of our products are based on new technology and the designs are complex. As such, they may contain undetected errors or performance problems, particularly during new or enhanced product launches. Despite product testing prior to introduction, our products have in the past, on occasion, contained errors that were discovered after commercial introduction. Any future defects discovered after shipment of our products could result in loss of sales, delays in market acceptance or product returns and warranty costs. We attempt to make adequate allowance in our new product release schedule for testing of product performance. Because of the complexity of our products, however, our release of new products may be postponed should test results indicate the need for redesign

and retesting, or should we elect to add product enhancements in response to customer feedback. In addition, third-party products, upon which our products are dependent, may contain defects which could reduce or undermine the performance of our products and adversely affect our operating results.

 

We may incur product liability claims which could be costly and could harm our reputation.

 

The sale of our products involves risk of product liability claims against us. We currently maintain product liability insurance, but our product liability insurance coverage is subject to various coverage exclusions and limits and may not be obtainable in the future on terms acceptable to us, or at all. We do not know whether claims against us with respect to our products, if any, would be successfully defended or whether our insurance would be sufficient to cover liabilities resulting from such claims. Any claims successfully brought against us could harm our business.

 

If we are unable to hire additional qualified personnel as necessary or if we lose key personnel, we may not be able to successfully manage our business or achieve our objectives.

 

We believe our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to identify, attract and retain highly skilled executive, managerial, engineering, sales and marketing, finance and operations personnel. Competition for personnel in the technology industry is intense, and we compete for personnel against numerous companies, including larger, more established companies with significantly greater financial resources. There can be no assurance we will be successful in identifying, attracting and retaining personnel.

 

Our success also depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our key executives, management, engineering, sales and marketing, finance and manufacturing personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our executive officers. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, the inability to identify, attract or retain qualified personnel in the future or delays in hiring required personnel could make it difficult for us to manage our business and meet key objectives, such as timely product introductions.

 

We may not be able to secure additional financing to meet our future capital needs.

 

We currently rely on cash flow from operations and cash on hand to fund our operating and capital needs. We may, in the future, expend significant capital to further develop our products, increase awareness of our brand names, expand our sales, operating and management infrastructure, and pursue opportunities to acquire businesses, products or technologies that complement or expand our current capabilities. We may also use capital more rapidly than currently anticipated. Additionally, we may incur higher operating expenses and generate lower revenue than currently expected, and we may be required to depend on external financing to satisfy our operating and capital needs. We may be unable to secure financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, at the time when we need such funding. If we raise funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership percentages of existing stockholders would be reduced, and the securities that we issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock or may be issued at a discount to the market price of our common stock which would result in dilution to our existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, we may be subject to debt covenants which could place limitations on our operations including our ability to declare and pay dividends. Our inability to raise additional funds on a timely basis would make it difficult for us to achieve our business objectives and would have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Risks Related To Our Industry

 

Intense competition in the market for mobile electronic devices could adversely affect our revenue and operating results.

 

The market for mobile electronic devices in general is intensely competitive, subject to rapid changes and sensitive to new product introductions or enhancements and marketing efforts by industry participants. We expect to experience significant and increasing levels of competition in the future, including competition from private label brands offered by consumer electronics retailers. There can be no assurance that we can maintain our competitive

position against current or potential competitors, including our own retail customers, especially those with greater financial, marketing, service, support, technical or other competitive resources.

 

We currently compete with the internal design efforts of various OEMs. These OEMs have larger technical staffs, more established and larger marketing and sales organizations and significantly greater financial resources than we do. Such competitors may respond more quickly than we do to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, may devote greater resources to the development, sale and promotion of their products better than we do or may develop products that are superior to our products or that achieve greater market acceptance.

 

Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to increase sales in our targeted markets. There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully with our competitors or that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business. Our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to increase our share of our target market and to sell additional products and product enhancements to existing customers. Future competition may result in price reductions, reduced margins or decreased sales.

 

Should the market demand for mobile electronic devices decrease, we may not achieve anticipated revenue.

 

The demand for the majority of our products and technology is primarily driven by the underlying market demand for mobile electronic devices. Should the growth in demand for mobile electronic devices be inhibited, we may not be able to increase or sustain revenue. Industry growth depends in part on the following factors:

 

 

The market for our products and services depends on economic conditions affecting the broader information technology market. Prolonged weakness in this market could cause customers to reduce their overall information technology budgets or reduce or cancel orders for our products. In this environment, our customers may experience financial difficulty, cease operations and fail to budget or reduce budgets for the purchase of our products and services. This, in turn, may lead to longer sales cycles, delays in purchase decisions, payment and collection, and may also result in downward price pressures, causing us to realize lower revenue and operating margins. In addition, general economic uncertainty and the recent general decline in capital spending in the information technology sector make it difficult to predict changes in the purchasing requirements of our customers and the markets we serve. We believe that, in light of these events, some businesses have and may continue to curtail or suspend capital spending on information technology. These factors may cause our revenue and operating margins to decline.

 

If our products fail to comply with domestic and international government regulations, or if these regulations result in a barrier to our business, our revenue could be negatively impacted.

 

Our products must comply with various domestic and international laws, regulations and standards. For example, the shipment of our products from the countries in which they are manufactured to other international or domestic locations requires us to obtain export licenses and to comply with possible import restrictions of the countries in which we sell our products. In the event that we are unable or unwilling to comply with any such laws, regulations or standards, we may decide not to conduct business in certain markets. Particularly in international markets, we may experience difficulty in securing required licenses or permits on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. In addition, we are generally required to obtain both domestic and foreign regulatory and safety approvals and certifications for our products. Failure to comply with existing or evolving laws or regulations, including export and import restrictions and barriers, or to obtain timely domestic or foreign regulatory approvals or certificates could negatively impact our revenue.

Economic conditions, political events, war, terrorism, public health issues, natural disasters and other circumstances could have a material adverse affect on our operations and performance.

 

Our operations and performance, including collection of our accounts receivable, depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions and their impact on levels of consumer spending, which have recently deteriorated significantly in many countries and regions, including the United States, and may remain depressed for the foreseeable future. Some of the factors that could influence the levels of consumer spending include volatility in fuel and other energy costs, conditions in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, labor and healthcare costs, increased unemployment (particularly with office workers), access to credit, consumer confidence and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior. These and other economic factors have had, and could continue to have, a material adverse effect on demand for our products and services and on our financial condition and operating results.

 

In addition, war, terrorism, geopolitical uncertainties, public health issues, and other business interruptions have caused and could cause damage or disruption to international commerce and the global economy, and thus could have a strong negative effect on us and our suppliers, logistics providers, manufacturing vendors and customers. Our business operations are subject to interruption by natural disasters, fire, power shortages, terrorist attacks, and other hostile acts, labor disputes, public health issues, and other events beyond our control. Such events could decrease demand for our products, make it difficult or impossible for us to make and deliver products to our customers or to receive components from our suppliers, and create delays and inefficiencies in our supply chain. Should major public health issues, including pandemics, arise, we could be negatively affected by more stringent employee travel restrictions, additional limitations in freight services, governmental actions limiting the movement of products between regions, delays in production ramps of new products, and disruptions in the operations of our manufacturing vendors and component suppliers.

 

Risks Related To Our Common Stock

 

Our common stock price has been volatile, which could result in substantial losses for stockholders.

 

Our common stock is currently traded on The NASDAQ Global Market. We have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, limited daily trading volume. The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile. The market for technology companies, in particular, has at various times experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may significantly affect the trading price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The trading price of our common stock could be affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, changes in expectations of our future performance, changes in estimates by securities analysts (or failure to meet such estimates), quarterly fluctuations in our sales and financial results and a variety of risk factors, including the ones described elsewhere in this report. Periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities sometimes result in securities class action litigation, which regardless of the merit of the claims, can be time-consuming, costly and divert management’s attention. In addition, if we needed to raise equity funds under adverse conditions, it would be difficult to sell a significant amount of our stock without causing a significant decline in the trading price of our stock.

 

Our common stock could be delisted from The NASDAQ Global Market if we fail to maintain compliance with its listing standards.

 

NASDAQ imposes certain standards that a company must satisfy in order to maintain the listing of its securities on The NASDAQ Global Market. Among other things, these standards require that we maintain an audit committee comprised of at least three members, all of whom must be independent. On October 20, 2009, Larry M. Carr resigned from our board immediately due to health reasons. Due to Mr. Carr’s resignation, we received written notification from The NASDAQ Stock Market that we were not in compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(c)(4)(B). In the event that we are not able to identify, recruit and successfully appoint a new independent board member to replace Mr. Carr by the time of our 2010 annual meeting of stockholders, our stock could be subject to delisting from The NASDAQ Global Market. Any such delisting could adversely affect the market liquidity of our common stock, and the market price of our common stock could decrease and could also adversely

affect our ability to obtain financing for the continuation of our operations and/or result in the loss of confidence by investors, customers, suppliers and employees.

 

Our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders have substantial influence over us.

 

As of January 1, 2010, our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders owning greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock together beneficially owned approximately 31% of the outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, may be able to exercise substantial influence over all matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. The concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in our control that may be viewed as beneficial by the other stockholders.

 

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make a proposed acquisition that is not approved by our board of directors more difficult.

 

Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us even if a change of control would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions include:

 

 

Our stockholder rights plan may make it more difficult for others to obtain control over us, even if it would be beneficial to our stockholders.

 

In June 2003, our board of directors adopted a stockholders rights plan. Pursuant to its terms, we have distributed a dividend of one right for each outstanding share of common stock. These rights cause substantial dilution to the ownership of a person or group that attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our board of directors and may have the effect of deterring hostile takeover attempts. These provisions could discourage a future takeover attempt which individual stockholders might deem to be in their best interests or in which shareholders would receive a premium for their shares over current prices.

 

Delaware law may delay or prevent a change in control.

 

We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. These provisions prohibit large stockholders, in particular a stockholder owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock, from consummating a merger or combination with a corporation, unless this stockholder receives board approval for the transaction, or 662/3% of the shares of voting stock not owned by the stockholder approve the merger or transaction. These provisions could discourage a future takeover attempt which individual stockholders might deem to be in their best interests or in which shareholders would receive a premium for their shares over current prices.

 

Our stock price may decline if additional shares are sold in the market.

 

As of March 1, 2010, we had 32,544,025 shares of common stock outstanding. All of our outstanding shares are currently available for sale in the public market, some of which are subject to volume and other limitations under the securities laws. Future sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock by our existing stockholders in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. We may be required to issue additional shares upon exercise of previously granted options and warrants that are currently outstanding.

 

As of March 1, 2010, we had (i) 35,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options under our long-term incentive plans, of which 35,000 options were exercisable; (ii) 1,312,535 shares of common stock issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units under our long term incentive plan and other outstanding awards;

and (iii) 872,008 shares were available for future issuance under our existing plans. We also had warrants outstanding to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock. Increased sales of our common stock in the market after exercise of currently outstanding options could exert significant downward pressure on our stock price. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price we deem appropriate.

 

 

None.

 

 

Our corporate offices are located in Scottsdale, Arizona. This facility consists of approximately 21,000 square feet of leased space pursuant to a lease for which the current term expires on February 28, 2014. We also lease offices in the United Kingdom, and Dong Guan, China. Each of these offices supports our selling, research and development, and general administrative activities. Our warehouse and product fulfillment operations are conducted at various third-party locations throughout the world. We believe our facilities are suitable and adequate for our current business activities for the remainder of the lease terms. Mission Technology Group leases a facility in San Diego, California.

 

 

We are, from time to time, party to certain legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course and are incidental to our business. Although litigation is inherently uncertain, based on past experience and the information currently available, our management does not believe that any currently pending and threatened litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, future events or circumstances, currently unknown to management will determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened litigation or claims will ultimately have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations in any future reporting period.

 

 

 

Our common stock has been traded on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “IGOI” since May 22, 2008. The following sets forth, for the period indicated, the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported by The NASDAQ Global Market.

 

 

As of March 1, 2010, there were 32,544,025 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 250 holders of record and the last reported sale price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market on March 1, 2010 was $1.17 per share.

 

Dividend Policy

 

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock, and it is the current intention of management to retain earnings to finance the growth of our business. Future payment of cash dividends will depend upon financial condition, results of operations, cash requirements, tax treatment, and certain corporate law requirements, as well as other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

During the fourth quarter of 2009, there were no repurchases made by us or on our behalf, or by any “affiliated purchasers,” of shares of our common stock.

 

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the other information contained in this Form 10-K. The selected financial data presented below under the captions “Consolidated Statements of Operations Data” and “Consolidated Balance Sheet Data” as of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2009 are derived from our consolidated financial statements, which consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm. The consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and consolidated statement of operations data for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, are derived from our consolidated financial statements, included in this Form 10-K.

 

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our selected consolidated financial data and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in this report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements. Our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements. Please see the “Disclosure Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” above for a discussion of factors that may affect our future results.

 

Overview

 

Increased functionality and the ability to access and manage information remotely are driving the proliferation of mobile electronic devices and applications. The popularity of these devices is increasing because of reductions in size, weight, and cost and improvements in functionality, storage capacity and reliability. Each of these devices needs to be powered and because of connected when in the home, the office, or on the road, and can be accessorized, representing opportunities for one or more of our products.

 

Our focus is on becoming a comprehensive provider of power management solutions. The centerpiece of our new power management solutions is the launch of our new iGo Green^tm products. The first iGo Green products are notebook chargers and surge protectors that incorporate our new patent-pending technology, which has been designed to reduce energy consumption and almost completely eliminate standby power, or vampire power, that results from devices that continue to consume power even when they are idle or shut-off, such as computers and mobile phones.

 

We believe that this power-saving technology, when combined with our existing power products that incorporate our interchangeable tip technology for both high-power and low-power mobile electronic devices, will help us achieve our long-term goal of establishing an industry standard for reduced power consumption in the charging of mobile electronic devices.

 

We use our proprietary technology to design and develop products that make computers and other electronic devices more efficient and cost effective, thus enabling higher utilization by professionals and consumers. Our products include power products for high-power mobile electronic devices, such as portable computers; power-saving surge protectors; power products for low-power mobile electronic devices, such as mobile phones, PDAs, and MP3 players; and accessory products. We are organized in three business segments, which consist of the High-Power Group, the Low-Power Group and the Connectivity Group. In February 2007, we sold substantially all of the assets, which consisted primarily of inventory, of our handheld hardware product line. The operating results of the handheld hardware product line were historically included in the results of the Connectivity Group. In April 2007, we sold substantially all of the remaining assets of our Connectivity Group. In addition, the operating results of Mission, which purchased substantially all of the assets of our expansion and docking product line, are consolidated with our operating results and are included in the Connectivity Group.

 

Sales through retailers and distributors accounted for approximately 59% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 and approximately 45% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008. Sales to private-label resellers and OEMs accounted for approximately 27% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 and approximately 45% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008. The balance of our revenue during these periods was derived from direct sales to end-users.

 

In March 2009, Targus notified us of its intent not to renew our distribution agreement, which expired in May 2009. At that time, Targus was one of our two largest customers and accounted for 21% of our sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 42% for the year ended December 31, 2008. Accordingly, in the future, we expect that we will be even more dependent upon a relatively small number of customers for a significant portion of our revenue, including most notably RadioShack. Further, we expect to experience a reduction in our revenue in the first half of 2010 as a result of the discontinuance of our relationship with Targus and a return to a traditional level of orders from RadioShack compared to the seasonal increase in orders that we received from RadioShack in the third quarter of 2009. We intend to develop relationships with a broader set of retailers and wireless carriers to expand the market availability of our iGo branded products. Our goal is that these relationships will allow us to diversify our

customer base, add stability and decrease our historical reliance upon a limited number of private label resellers. These relationships could significantly increase the availability and exposure of our products, particularly among large national and international retailers and wireless carriers, however we can provide no assurance that we will be able to replace the lost revenue from Targus.

 

Our ability to execute successfully on our near and long-term objectives depends largely upon the general market acceptance of our green technology which allows users to significantly reduce vampire power, our ability to acquire and protect our proprietary rights to this technology, and on general economic conditions. Additionally, we must execute on the customer relationships that we have developed and continue to design, develop, manufacture and market new and innovative technology and products that are embraced by these customers and the overall market in general.

 

High-Power Group.  Our High-Power Group is focused on the development, marketing and sale of power products and accessories for mobile electronic devices with high power requirements, which consist primarily of portable computers and our recently introduced line of power-saving surge protectors. These devices also allow users to simultaneously charge one or more low-power mobile electronic devices with our optional iGo dualpower and power splitter accessories. We sell our iGo branded products directly to retailers such as RadioShack, hhgregg, Fry’s Electronics and Office Max. Historically, we sold these products to private-label resellers and OEM’s. We supplied OEM — specific, high-power adapter products to Dell through the first quarter of 2007 and we supplied Lenovo through the first quarter of 2008. Until May 2009, we also marketed and distributed high-power adapter products on a private-label basis through Targus. Targus accounted for approximately 40% of High-Power Group revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 and approximately 70% of High-Power Group revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008. High-Power Group revenue accounted for approximately 52% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 and approximately 60% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

Low-Power Group.  Our Low-Power Group is focused on the development, marketing and sale of power products for low-power mobile electronic devices, such as mobile phones, smartphones, PDAs, MP3 players and portable gaming consoles. These products include cigarette lighter adapters, mobile AC adapters, low-power universal AC/DC adapters, and low-power universal battery products. Each of these power devices is designed to incorporate our interchangeable tip technology. We sell these products to distributors, resellers and retailers. Low-power product revenue accounted for approximately 36% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 31% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

During 2007, the market for foldable keyboards decreased significantly and we made the decision to discontinue the production and marketing of foldable keyboard products. We sold the remaining inventory of these products in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, revenue from this product line decreased significantly in 2008. We have historically accounted for our foldable keyboard business as part of our Low-Power Group. Sales of these foldable keyboard products represented less than 1% of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Connectivity Group.  Our Connectivity Group consists primarily of the operating results of Mission. The Connectivity Group was historically focused on the development, marketing and sale of connectivity and expansion and docking products.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make a number of estimates and judgments which impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

 

On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debt expense, warranty obligations, sales returns, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the

basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from our estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

 

Revenue Recognition.  Revenue from product sales is generally recognized upon shipment and transfer of ownership from us or our contract manufacturers to the customers. Allowances for sales returns and credits are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded. Should the actual return or sales credit rates differ from our estimates, revisions to our estimated allowance for sales returns and credits may be required.

 

Our recognition of revenue from product sales to distributors, resellers and retailers, or the “retail and distribution channel,” is affected by agreements giving certain customers rights to return up to 15% of their prior quarter’s purchases, provided that the customer places a new order for an equal or greater dollar value of the amount returned. We also have agreements with certain customers that allow them to receive credit for subsequent price reductions, or “price protection.” At the time we recognize revenue related to these agreements, we reduce revenue for the gross sales value of estimated future returns, as well as our estimate of future price protection. We also reduce cost of revenue for the gross product cost of estimated future returns. We record an allowance for sales returns in the amount of the difference between the gross sales value and the cost of revenue as a reduction of accounts receivable. We also have agreements with certain customers that provide them with a 100% right of return prior to the ultimate sale to an end user of the product. Accordingly, we have recorded deferred revenue of $965,000 and $412,000 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which we expect to recognize as revenue when the product is sold to the end user. Gross sales to the retail and distribution channel accounted for approximately 59% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 45% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

Historically, a correlation has existed between the amount of retail and distribution channel inventory and the amount of returns that actually occur. The greater the inventory held by our distributors, the more product returns we expect. As part of our effort to reach an appropriate accounting estimate for returns, for each of our products, we monitor levels of product sales and inventory at our distributors’ warehouses and at retailers. In estimating returns, we analyze historical returns, current inventory in the retail and distribution channel, current economic trends, changes in consumer demand, the introduction of new competing products and market acceptance of our products.

 

In recent years, as a result of a combination of the factors described above, we have reduced our gross sales to reflect our estimated amounts of returns and price protection. It is possible that returns could increase rapidly and significantly in the future. Accordingly, estimating product returns requires significant management judgment. In addition, different return estimates that we reasonably could have used could have had a material impact on our reported sales and thus could have had a material impact on the presentation of the results of operations. For these reasons, we believe that the accounting estimate related to product returns and price protection is a critical accounting estimate.

 

Inventory Valuation.  Inventories consist of finished goods and component parts purchased both partially and fully assembled. We experience all the typical risks and rewards of inventory held by contract manufacturers. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Inventories include material, labor and overhead costs. Labor and overhead costs are allocated to inventory based on a percentage of material costs. We monitor usage reports to determine if the carrying value of any items should be adjusted due to lack of demand. We make a downward adjustment to the value of our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. We recorded a downward adjustment of $4.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2007. During 2008, we recorded additional profit due to better than planned sales of excess inventory that had previously been adjusted to zero value. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

 

Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance.  We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In determining the amount of the valuation allowance, we consider estimated future taxable income as well as feasible tax planning strategies in each taxing jurisdiction in which we operate. Historically, we have recorded a deferred tax valuation allowance in an amount equal to our net

deferred tax assets. If we determine that we will ultimately be able to utilize all or a portion of deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance has been provided, the related portion of the valuation allowance will be released to income as a credit to income tax expense. During 2009, we released $234,000 of the valuation allowance relating to an application for a refund of federal alternative minimum taxes paid in 2005 and 2006 in connection with the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009.

 

Long-Lived Asset Valuation.  We test our recorded long-lived assets whenever events indicate the recorded intangible assets may be impaired. Our long-lived asset impairment approach is based on an undiscounted cash flows approach. We have recorded long-lived asset impairment charges in the past, and if we fail to achieve our assumed growth rates or assumed gross margin, we may incur additional charges for impairment in the future. For these reasons, we believe that the accounting estimates related to long-lived assets are critical accounting estimates.

 

Variable Interest Entities.  The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) is required to include the VIE’s assets, liabilities and operating results in its consolidated financial statements. In general, a VIE is an entity used to conduct activities or hold assets that either (i) has an insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional subordinated financial support, (ii) has a group of equity owners that are unable to make significant decisions about its activities, or (iii) has a group of equity owners that do not have the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations.

 

In April 2007, we completed a sale of the assets of our expansion and docking business to Mission, an entity that was formed by a former officer of the Company, in exchange for $3.9 million of notes receivable and a 15% common equity interest. We contributed no cash equity to Mission at its formation and Mission’s equity consists solely of its operating profit. Accordingly, we have determined that Mission does not have sufficient equity to carry out its principal operating activities without subordinated financial support, and that Mission qualifies as a VIE. We have also determined that our 15% equity interest and our $3.9 million notes receivable qualify as variable interests. Furthermore, as Mission is obligated to repay the promissory notes it issued to us, we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE, and accordingly, must include the assets, liabilities and operating results of Mission in our consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-17 (“ASU 2009-17”) 2009-17, “Consolidations (Topic 810) — Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities.” ASU 2009-17 changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. ASU 2009-17 also requires a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with VIE’s and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. ASU 2009-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within the first annual reporting period. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2009-17 on January 1, 2010, we expect to no longer consolidate the results of Mission.

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth certain consolidated financial data for the periods indicated expressed as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated:

 

 

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007

 

Revenue.  Revenue generally consists of sales of products, net of returns and allowances. To date, our revenues have come predominantly from power adapters, handheld products, expansion and docking products, and accessories. The following table summarizes the year-over-year comparison of our consolidated revenue for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

 

Following is a discussion of revenue by business segment.

 

High-Power Group.  High-Power Group revenue is derived from sales of power products and accessories for mobile electronic devices with high power requirements, which consist primarily of portable computers. The following table summarizes the year-over-year comparison of our High-Power Group revenue for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

 

The 2009 decrease in High-Power Group revenue was primarily due to the decrease in the sales of high power products to private label resellers. Overall sales of high-power products to private label resellers decreased by

$17.9 million, or 55.8% to $14.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $32.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. In March 2009, Targus notified us of its intent not to renew our distribution agreement, which expired by its terms in May 2009. Accordingly, we do not anticipate any significant additional orders for our power products from Targus beyond the year ending December 31, 2009. Sales to Targus decreased by $20.7 million, or 64.0% to $11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $32.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decline in sales of high power products to private label resellers was partially offset by an increase in sales of high power products to wireless carriers of $454,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008. We expect High-Power Group revenue in 2010 to stabilize as we anticipate growth in sales of high-power products and power-saving surge protectors to retailers.

 

The 2008 decrease in High-Power Group revenue was primarily due to the decrease in the sale of high power products to OEM accounts. Sales to OEMs decreased by $10.0 million, or 87.9%, to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $11.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to the loss of business from Dell and Lenovo. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in revenue from sales to Targus in 2008 by $5.1 million, or 18.9%, to $32.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Likewise, revenue from sales to RadioShack increased by $3.3 million, or 63.1%, to $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Low-Power Group.  Low-Power Group revenue is derived from the sales of low-power adapter products and foldable keyboard products. The following table summarizes the year-over-year comparison of our Low-Power Group revenue for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

 

The 2009 decrease in Low-Power Group revenue was primarily due to a decrease in the sale of low-power products to RadioShack. Overall sales of low-power products to RadioShack decreased by $4.2 million, or 24.5%, to $12.8 million, or 63.6% of Low-Power Group revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $17.0 million, or 71.7% of Low-Power Group revenue, for the year ended December 31, 2008. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in sales to wireless distributors and other retailers of $437,000, or 6.3% to $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. We expect sales of low power products to RadioShack to continue to decline in 2010 as a result of the introduction of its own private label brand of low-power products during 2009. We anticipate continuing to gain market penetration into wireless distribution and other retail channels in 2010, which could partially offset the expected decrease in revenue from RadioShack.

 

The 2008 increase in Low-Power Group revenue was primarily due to revenue from sales of low-power product sales to RadioShack, which increased by $1.6 million, or 10.4% to $17.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $15.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Revenue from sales of low-power products to wireless carrier distribution increased by $1.5 million, or 94.4%, to $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Revenue from sales of low-power products in the airport channel increased by $744,000, or 107.9% to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $689,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. These increases were offset by a decrease in revenue from the sales of foldable keyboards of $2.6 million, or 83.8%, to $504,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 due to the company discontinuing this line of products during 2008.

 

Connectivity Group.  Connectivity Group revenue was derived from sales of expansion and docking products and handheld products. In the first quarter of 2007, we divested the handheld hardware product line. In the second quarter of 2007, we sold the assets of the expansion and docking product line to Mission. We consolidate the operating results of Mission Technology and those results are included in the Connectivity Group. See

“— Acquisitions and Dispositions” for more information. The following table summarizes the year-over-year comparison of our Connectivity Group revenue for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

 

Connectivity revenue decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared with revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 due primarily to a general decline in demand for these products. Beginning January 1, 2010, we expect to no longer consolidate the operating results of Mission Technology Group into the Connectivity Group, and as a result, we expect to eliminate the Connectivity Group segment effective January 1, 2010.

 

Connectivity revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 was consistent with revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Cost of revenue, gross profit and gross margin.  Cost of revenue generally consists of costs associated with components, outsourced manufacturing and in-house labor associated with assembly, testing, packaging, shipping and quality assurance, depreciation of equipment and indirect manufacturing costs. Gross profit is the difference between revenue and cost of revenue. Gross margin is gross profit stated as a percentage of revenue. The following tables summarize the year-over-year comparison of our cost of revenue, gross profit and gross margin for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

Cost of revenue:

 

 

Gross profit and gross margin:

 

 

The 2009 decrease in cost of revenue and corresponding increase in gross profit was primarily due to the decrease in revenue discussed above. The increase in gross margin was due primarily to an increase in average direct margin, which excludes labor and overhead costs, on high-power and low-power products to 39.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to 35.9% for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily as a result in the decline of sales of high power products to private label resellers which typically result in lower margins, combined with an increase in the mix of sales to low-power products relative to total revenue. Labor and overhead costs, which are mostly fixed, decreased by $1.7 million, or 32.6%, to $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. As a result of these factors, cost of revenue, as a percentage of revenue, decreased to 66.9% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 70.7% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

The 2008 decrease in cost of revenue and the corresponding increase in gross margin was due primarily to a charge to excess and obsolete inventory expense of $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The positive impact of the reduced excess and obsolete inventory expense was partially offset by a decline in average direct margin, which excludes labor and overhead costs, on high-power products to 28.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to 35.1% for the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily as a result of the reduced direct margin on sales to Targus during

2008. As a result of these factors, cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue decreased to 70.7% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 75.2% for the year ended December 31, 2007, resulting in increased gross margin.

 

Sales and marketing.  Sales and marketing expenses generally consist of salaries, commissions and other personnel-related costs of our sales, marketing and support personnel, advertising, public relations, promotions, printed media and travel. The following table summarizes the year-over-year comparison of our sales and marketing expenses for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

 

The 2009 decrease in sales and marketing expenses primarily resulted from reduced personnel costs and reduced distribution and retail programs. Specifically, personnel costs decreased by $651,000 or 13.9% to $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Distribution and retail program expenses decreased $885,000, or 80.5%, to $183,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses increased to 13.8% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 11.8% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

The 2008 decrease in sales and marketing expenses primarily resulted from reduced investment in nationwide newspaper and radio advertising campaigns in the United States. Specifically, advertising expense decreased by $798,000, or 85.6%, to $135,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $932,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007. As a percentage of revenue, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 11.8% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 12.6% for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Research and development.  Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel-related costs, outside consulting, lab costs and travel-related costs of our product development group. The following table summarizes the year-over-year comparison of our research and development expenses for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

 

The decrease in research and development expenses in 2009 resulted primarily from a decline of personnel and product certification-related expenses. Personnel-related expenses decreased by $441,000, or 16.9% to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Product certification and testing-related expenses decreased by $148,000, or 24.2% to $463,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $611,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. As a percentage of revenue, research and development expenses increased to 5.4% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 4.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

The decrease in research and development expenses in 2008 primarily resulted from reduced personnel expenses directly relating to the impact of an organizational restructuring that occurred in July 2007. As a result of the July 2007 action, employee-related expenses decreased by $1.1 million, or 32.8%, to $2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Engineering-related consulting and development fees also decreased by $474,000, or 40.9%, to $684,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. As a percentage of revenue, research and development expenses decreased to 4.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 6.7% for the year ended December 31, 2007.

General and administrative.  General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel-related expenses of our finance, human resources, information systems, corporate development and other administrative personnel, as well as facilities, legal and other professional fees, depreciation and amortization and related expenses. The following table summarizes the year-over-year comparison of our general and administrative expenses for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

 

The 2009 decrease in general and administrative expenses primarily result from decreases to personnel-related expenses, legal expense, non-cash equity compensation, and insurance. Specifically, personnel-related expenses decreased by $880,000, or 22.7% to $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Legal expense decreased $1.0 million, or 71.4% to $374,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily as a result of the resolution of outstanding litigation matters during 2009. Non-cash equity compensation expense decreased by $753,000, or 35.8% to $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily as a result of a reduction in non-cash equity awards granted during 2009 combined with an increase in the number of non-cash equity awards cancelled during 2009. Insurance related expenses decreased by $90,000, or 27.8% to $234,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $324,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily as a result of reduced premiums for directors and officers liability insurance. General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue increased to 16.2% for the year ended December 31, 2009, from 15.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

The 2008 decrease in general and administrative expenses primarily resulted from decreases to personnel-related expenses, outside professional fees and non-cash equity compensation expense. Specifically, personnel-related expenses decreased $1.0 million, or 23.7%, to $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Included in this decrease is $614,000 in separation expense incurred in connection with the retirement of our former chief executive officer in 2007. Outside professional fees, including legal and accounting, decreased $1.0 million, or 28.1%, to $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, from $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Non-cash equity compensation decreased by $563,000 to $2.1 million, or 21.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, due primarily to the organizational restructuring that occurred in July 2007 and the resignation of a board member that occurred in May 2008. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased to 15.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 19.1% for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Asset impairment.  Asset impairment expense consists of expenses associated with impairment write-downs of goodwill, amortizable intangible assets, and property and equipment.

 

At December 31, 2007, we determined that $3.7 million of goodwill associated with the High-Power Group and $237,000 of goodwill associated with the Low-Power Group was fully impaired. Accordingly, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $3.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2007. Also, during the fourth quarter of 2007, as a result of our decision to discontinue production and marketing of foldable keyboard products, we determined a triggering event had occurred resulting in an asset impairment charge of $1.1 million related to amortizable intangible assets and property and equipment associated with our Low-Power Group. As a result of these factors, we recorded total asset impairment charges of $5.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

We recorded no asset impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Interest income, net.  Interest income, net consists primarily of interest earned on our cash balances and short-term investments. The following table summarizes the year-over-year comparison of interest income, net for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

 

The 2009 decrease was primarily due to generally declining interest rates during 2009. At December 31, 2009, the average yield on our cash and short-term investments was less than 1%.

 

The 2008 decrease was primarily due to generally declining interest rates during 2008. At December 31, 2008, the average yield on our cash and short-term investments was approximately 2.2%.

 

Gain (loss) on disposal of assets and other income, net.  Gain (loss) on disposal of assets and other income, net consists of the net proceeds received from the disposal of assets, less the remaining net book value of the disposed assets and other income in connection with the collection of notes receivable that had been previously deferred in connection with the sale of the assets of our handheld software and hardware product lines. The following table summarizes the year-over-year comparison of gain on disposal of assets for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):

 

 

The 2009 gain on disposal of assets and other income, net was primarily due to other deferred income recorded in connection with the collections of notes receivable from Quickoffice and CradlePoint relating to our sales of the assets of our handheld software product line in 2004 and our hardware product line in 2007.

 

The 2008 gain on disposal of assets and other income, net was primarily due to our sale of a portfolio of 23 patents and patents pending relating to our foldable keyboard intellectually property, with a net book value of $344,000 for net proceeds of approximately $1.0 million which resulted in a gain of approximately $656,000.

 

The 2007 gain on disposal of assets and other income, net was primarily due to our sale of a portfolio of 13 patents and patents pending relating to our SplitBridge and serialized PCI intellectual property, with a net book value of $28,000 for net proceeds of approximately $1.8 million, which resulted in a gain of approximately $1.8 million.

 

Litigation settlement.  Litigation settlement consists of income/expenses incurred in connection with the settlement of litigation.

 

Certain former officers of iGo Corporation had sought potential indemnification claims against our wholly-owned subsidiary, iGo Direct Corporation, relating to an SEC matter involving such individuals (but not involving us) that related to matters that arose prior to our acquisition of iGo Corporation in September 2002. We initiated litigation against the carrier of iGo Corporation’s directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for coverage of these claims under its insurance policy. During 2006, we reached settlement agreements with two of the three former officers of iGo Corporation who were seeking indemnification from us, and during the quarter ended March 31, 2008, we settled our litigation with iGo Corporation’s former insurance carrier, obtaining reimbursement from the insurance carrier in the amount of $1,500,000. Further, in connection with our settlement with the insurance carrier, we reached a settlement agreement with the last of the three former officers of iGo Corporation and reimbursed him $828,000 in final settlement of all his indemnification claims. We recorded net litigation settlement income of $672,000 during the year ended December 31, 2008.

Income taxes.  During the year ended December 31, 2009, we filed Form 1139, Corporation Application for Tentative Refund, to claim a refund of alternative minimum taxes paid for the year ended December 31, 2005 pursuant to the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009, passed on November 5, 2009. As a result, we recorded an income tax benefit of $234,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

We have incurred net operating losses from inception through the end of 2009; therefore, no provision for income taxes was required for the years ended December 31, 2008 or 2007. Based on historical operating losses and our financial projections, it is more likely than not that we will not fully realize the benefits of the net operating loss carry-forwards. Thus, we have not recorded a tax benefit from our net operating loss carry-forwards for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

Operating Outlook

 

Due to increased competition and the current global economic downturn, we have experienced a decline in consumer demand for our products. It is difficult for us to predict the depth and length of this economic downturn and its impact on our business in the long-term. We expect 2010 revenue to continue to decrease from 2009 levels, primarily due to a reduction in consumer demand for mobile electronic accessories resulting from the ongoing worldwide recession and from the loss of our largest customer, Targus. This reduction in revenue may be partially offset by further gains in market penetration into mobile wireless carriers, distributors and retailers largely through our sales efforts.

 

We expect gross margin percentage in 2010 to be slightly higher than 2009 due to a shift in customer mix from private label customers to direct sales to retailers. We expect operating expenses related to our power businesses to decrease in 2010 compared to 2009, as we expect reduced general and administrative expenses, partially offset by increased spending in sales and marketing and research and development.

 

As a result of our planned research and development efforts, we expect to further expand our intellectual property position by filing for additional patents. A portion of these costs are recorded as research and development expense as incurred, and a portion are capitalized and amortized as general and administrative expense. We may also incur additional legal and related expenses associated with the defense and enforcement of our intellectual property portfolio, which could increase our general and administrative expenses.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Cash and Cash Flow.  Our available cash and cash equivalents are held in bank deposits and money market funds in the United States and the United Kingdom. Our intent is that the cash balances in the United Kingdom will remain there for future growth and investments, and we will meet any liquidity requirements in the United States through ongoing cash flows from operations, external financing, or both. We actively monitor the third-party depository institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents. Our emphasis is primarily on safety of principal and not on maximizing yield. We diversify our cash and cash equivalents among counterparties to minimize exposure to any one of these entities. To date, we have experienced no material loss or lack of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, we can provide no assurances that access to our invested cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.

 

At any point in time we have funds in our operating accounts and customer accounts that are with third-party financial institutions. These balances in the U.S. may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits. While we monitor the cash balances in our operating accounts and adjust the cash balances as appropriate, these cash balances could be impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail or could be subject to other adverse conditions in the financial markets.

 

Our primary use of cash has been to purchase short-term investments. The anticipated growth of our business will require investments in accounts receivable and inventories. In addition to our cash flow from operations, our primary sources of liquidity have been funds provided by issuances of equity securities and proceeds from the sale of intellectual property assets. We cannot assure you that these sources will be available to us in the future.

 

Capital markets in the United States and throughout the world remain disrupted and under stress. This disruption and stress is evidenced by a lack of liquidity in the debt capital markets, the re-pricing of credit risk in the

syndicated credit market and the failure of certain major financial institutions. This stress is compounded by the ongoing severe worldwide rescission. Despite actions of the U.S. federal government, these events have contributed to worsening general economic conditions that are materially and adversely impacting the broader financial and credit markets and reduced the availability of debt capital for the market as a whole. Reflecting this concern, many lenders and capital providers have reduced, and in some cases ceased to provide, debt funding to borrowers. The resulting lack of available credit, lack of confidence in the financial sector, increased volatility in the financial markets and reduced business activity could materially and adversely impact our ability to obtain additional or alternative financing.

 

The following table sets forth for the period presented certain consolidated cash flow information (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

The decrease in DSOs at December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 was primarily due to decreases in accounts receivable from Targus. We expect DSOs will increase in 2010 as a result of our planned expansion of direct sales to retailers and the associated anticipated timing of cash receipts from our customers. The decrease in inventory turns was primarily due to the decline in revenue from sales to Targus and RadioShack, for whom we hold no inventory. We expect to manage inventory growth during 2010 but we expect inventory turns to decrease relative to 2009 inventory turns as we anticipate carrying higher levels of inventory for our new retail customers.

 

The decrease in DSOs at December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007 was primarily due to the reductions in accounts receivable from Lenovo due to the loss of that account, combined with the faster timing of payments received from Targus. The increase in inventory turns was primarily due to excess and obsolete inventory charges recorded during 2007 relating to our connectivity, low-power and keyboard inventories.

 

 

 

Investments.  At December 31, 2009, our investments in marketable securities included six corporate bonds, one United States Agency bond, six commercial paper instruments issued by various companies, and one municipal mutual fund with a total fair value of approximately $13.0 million. At December 31, 2009, four of these securities had an unrealized loss, representing less than 1% of the book value of all marketable securities in the portfolio.

 

We believe we have the ability to hold all marketable securities to maturity. However, we may dispose of securities prior to their scheduled maturity due to changes in interest rates, prepayments, tax and credit considerations, liquidity or regulatory capital requirements, or other similar factors. As a result, we classify all marketable securities as available-for-sale. These securities are reported at fair value based on third-party broker statements, which represents level 2 in the fair value hierarchy, with unrealized gains and losses, reported in stockholders’ equity as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income.

 

Financing Facilities.  In July 2008, the line of credit we had entered into in July 2006 expired and we elected to not renew this credit facility due to our current cash and investment position. In the future, debt financing may not be available to us in amounts or on terms that are acceptable to us.

 

Contractual Obligations.  In our day-to-day business activities, we incur certain commitments to make future payments under contracts such as operating leases and purchase orders. Maturities under these contracts are set forth in the following table as of December 31, 2009 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

The preceding table does not include Mission’s contractual obligations.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.  We have no off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

 

Acquisitions and dispositions.  In the past we have made acquisitions of other companies to complement our product offerings and expand our revenue base.

 

Our future strategy includes the possible acquisition of other businesses to continue to expand or complement our operations. The magnitude, timing and nature of any future acquisitions will depend on a number of factors, including the availability of suitable acquisition candidates, the negotiation of acceptable terms, our financial capabilities and general economic and business conditions. Financing of future acquisitions would result in the utilization of cash, incurrence of additional debt, issuance of additional equity securities or a combination of all of these. Our future strategy may also include the possible disposition of assets that are not considered integral to our business which would likely result in the generation of cash.

 

Net Operating Loss Carryforwards.  As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately $157 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards which expire at various dates. We anticipate that the sale of common stock in our initial public offering and in subsequent private offerings, as well as the issuance of our common stock for acquisitions, coupled with prior sales of common stock will cause an annual limitation on the use of our net operating loss carryforwards pursuant to the change in ownership provisions of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. This limitation is expected to have a material effect on the timing of and our ability to use the net operating loss carryforwards in the future. Additionally, our ability to use the net operating loss carry-forwards is dependent upon our level of future profitability, which cannot be determined.

Liquidity Outlook.  Based on our projections, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and our cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. If we require additional capital resources to grow our business internally or to acquire complementary technologies and businesses at any time in the future, we may seek to obtain debt financing or sell additional equity securities. The sale of additional equity securities would result in more dilution to our stockholders. In addition, additional capital resources may not be available to us in amounts or on terms that are acceptable to us.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for a summary of recently issued accounting pronouncements.

 

 

We are exposed to certain market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks result primarily from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. In addition, our international operations are subject to risks related to differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures and other regulations and restrictions.

 

To date we have not utilized derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. We do not expect to employ these or other strategies to hedge market risk in the foreseeable future. We invest our cash in money market funds and short-term investments, which are subject to minimal credit and market risk. We believe that the market risks associated with these financial instruments are immaterial.

 

See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion of our capital structure. Market risk, calculated as the potential change in fair value of our cash equivalents, short-term investments and line of credit resulting from a hypothetical 1.0% (100 basis point) change in interest rates, was not material at December 31, 2009.

 

IGO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

iGo, Inc.:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of iGo, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of iGo, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, as of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, which changed the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which are now recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity.

 

(signed) /s/ KPMG LLP

 

Phoenix, Arizona

March 9, 2010

IGO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

IGO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

IGO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

IGO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS