Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - EX-32 - Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLCa10-5058_1ex32.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLCa10-5058_1ex31d2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLCa10-5058_1ex31d1.htm
EX-10.32 - EX-10.32 - Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLCa10-5058_1ex10d32.htm
EX-10.59 - EX-10.59 - Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLCa10-5058_1ex10d59.htm

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended January 30, 2010

 

OR

 

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission file no. 333-133184-12

 

Neiman Marcus, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

20-3509435

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

 

 

1618 Main Street

Dallas, Texas

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

75201

(Zip code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (214) 743-7600

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer x

 

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No x

 

There were 1,013,082 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $.01 per share, outstanding at January 30, 2010.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

 

INDEX

 

 

 

Page

 

 

Number

Part I.

Financial Information

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 30, 2010, August 1, 2009 and January 31, 2009

1

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Thirteen Weeks Ended January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009

2

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009

3

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Twenty-Six Weeks Ended January 30, 2010 and January 31, 2009

4

 

 

 

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

26

 

 

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

45

 

 

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

46

 

 

 

Part II.

Other Information

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

46

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

46

 

 

 

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

55

 

 

 

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

55

 

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

55

 

 

 

Signatures

62

 



Table of Contents

 

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

 

(in thousands, except shares)

 

January 30,
2010

 

August 1,
2009

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

500,661

 

$

323,425

 

$

223,184

 

Merchandise inventories

 

732,289

 

755,034

 

840,331

 

Deferred income taxes

 

19,136

 

19,136

 

32,659

 

Other current assets

 

77,614

 

123,932

 

137,324

 

Total current assets

 

1,329,700

 

1,221,527

 

1,233,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

 

947,371

 

992,715

 

1,031,285

 

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

 

3,242,317

 

3,278,947

 

3,473,205

 

Other assets

 

80,463

 

87,837

 

71,062

 

Total assets

 

$

5,599,851

 

$

5,581,026

 

$

5,809,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

190,049

 

$

233,990

 

$

195,629

 

Accrued liabilities

 

370,275

 

302,886

 

365,409

 

Other current liabilities

 

45,479

 

26,617

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

605,803

 

563,493

 

561,038

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

2,972,222

 

2,954,221

 

2,946,199

 

Deferred income taxes

 

684,185

 

697,810

 

750,027

 

Deferred real estate credits

 

98,493

 

96,420

 

90,188

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

296,287

 

350,247

 

368,019

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

4,051,187

 

4,098,698

 

4,154,433

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock (par value $0.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares authorized and 1,013,082 shares issued and outstanding at January 30, 2010, August 1, 2009 and January 31, 2009)

 

10

 

10

 

10

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

1,428,513

 

1,424,258

 

1,421,253

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(97,301

)

(104,587

)

(98,506

)

Retained deficit

 

(388,361

)

(400,846

)

(229,178

)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

942,861

 

918,835

 

1,093,579

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

5,599,851

 

$

5,581,026

 

$

5,809,050

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

1



Table of Contents

 

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,102,361

 

$

1,079,379

 

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)

 

761,485

 

821,403

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)

 

237,581

 

243,580

 

Income from credit card program, net

 

(16,572

)

(10,187

)

Depreciation expense

 

34,422

 

39,112

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

13,845

 

13,568

 

Amortization of favorable lease commitments

 

4,469

 

4,469

 

Impairment charges

 

 

560,159

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings (loss)

 

67,131

 

(592,725

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

59,004

 

58,581

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 

8,127

 

(651,306

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

4,163

 

(142,050

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

$

3,964

 

$

(509,256

)

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2



Table of Contents

 

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

1,971,261

 

$

2,065,166

 

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)

 

1,295,709

 

1,439,146

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)

 

456,397

 

486,408

 

Income from credit card program, net

 

(29,659

)

(23,187

)

Depreciation expense

 

70,205

 

77,711

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

27,691

 

27,135

 

Amortization of favorable lease commitments

 

8,939

 

8,939

 

Impairment charges

 

 

560,159

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating earnings (loss)

 

141,979

 

(511,145

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

118,369

 

116,426

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 

23,610

 

(627,571

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

11,125

 

(131,193

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

$

12,485

 

$

(496,378

)

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS - OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

$

12,485

 

$

(496,378

)

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

115,922

 

120,894

 

Paid-in-kind interest

 

14,362

 

 

Impairment charges

 

 

560,159

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(18,318

)

(122,158

)

Other, primarily costs related to defined benefit pension and other long-term benefit plans

 

2,568

 

8,457

 

 

 

127,019

 

70,974

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Merchandise inventories

 

22,745

 

137,713

 

Other current assets

 

46,318

 

(64

)

Other assets

 

3,330

 

(3,415

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

27,785

 

(164,007

)

Deferred real estate credits

 

5,184

 

8,580

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

232,381

 

49,781

 

CASH FLOWS — INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(28,382

)

(64,544

)

Net cash used for investing activities

 

(28,382

)

(64,544

)

CASH FLOWS — FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of borrowings under senior term loan facility

 

(26,617

)

 

Repayment of borrowings

 

(146

)

(1,233

)

Net cash used for financing activities

 

(26,763

)

(1,233

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) during the period

 

177,236

 

(15,996

)

Beginning balance

 

323,425

 

239,180

 

Ending balance

 

$

500,661

 

$

223,184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid (received) during the period for:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

90,634

 

$

111,129

 

Income taxes

 

$

(13,355

)

$

3,206

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

 

1.              Basis of Presentation

 

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the applicable interim periods.

 

The specialty retail industry is seasonal in nature, with a higher level of sales typically generated in the fall and holiday selling seasons.  Due to seasonal and other factors, the results of operations for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 are not necessarily comparable to, or indicative of, results of any other interim period or for the fiscal year as a whole.

 

Neiman Marcus, Inc. (the Company) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of and is controlled by Newton Holding, LLC (Holding).  Holding is controlled by investment funds affiliated with TPG Capital and Warburg Pincus (collectively, the Sponsors).  The Company was formed by Holding for the purpose of acquiring The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (NMG), which acquisition was completed on October 6, 2005 (the Acquisition).  The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the amounts of the Company and its subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to July 31.  All references to the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 relate to the thirteen weeks ended January 30, 2010.  All references to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 relate to the thirteen weeks ended January 31, 2009.  All references to year-to-date fiscal 2010 relate to the twenty-six weeks ended January 30, 2010.  All references to year-to-date fiscal 2009 relate to the twenty-six weeks ended January 31, 2009.

 

A detailed description of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

Use of Estimates.  We are required to make estimates and assumptions about future events in preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of gain and loss contingencies at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.  While we believe that our past estimates and assumptions have been materially accurate, our current estimates are subject to change if different assumptions as to the outcome of future events were made. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and predicate those estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances.  We make adjustments to our assumptions and judgments when facts and circumstances dictate.  Since future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, encompass the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements:

 

·                  Recognition of revenues;

·                  Valuation of merchandise inventories, including determination of original retail values, recognition of markdowns and vendor allowances, estimation of inventory shrinkage, and determination of cost of goods sold;

·                  Determination of impairment of long-lived assets;

·                  Recognition of advertising and catalog costs;

·                  Measurement of liabilities related to our loyalty programs;

·                  Recognition of income taxes; and

 

5



Table of Contents

 

·                  Measurement of accruals for general liability, workers’ compensation and health insurance claims and pension and postretirement health care benefits.

 

Fair Value Measurements.  Under generally accepted accounting principles, we are required 1) to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value or 2) to disclose the fair value of certain assets and liabilities recorded at cost.  Pursuant to these fair value measurement and disclosure requirements, fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value is calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities includes consideration of non-performance risk, including our own credit risk.  Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the following three levels:

 

·                  Level 1 — valuation inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

 

·                  Level 2 — valuation inputs are based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

·                  Level 3 — valuation inputs are unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

 

At January 30, 2010, August 1, 2009 and January 31, 2009, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables and accounts payable approximated their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.  See Notes 3 and 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for the estimated fair values of our debt instruments, interest rate swap and interest rate cap financial instruments subject to fair value disclosures.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.  In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance that addresses the recognition and accounting for identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests in business combinations.  In addition, this guidance changes the accounting treatment for certain acquisition-related items, including requirements to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred, expense restructuring costs associated with an acquired business and recognize post-acquisition changes in tax uncertainties associated with a business combination as a component of tax expense.  These rules are to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after December 15, 2008.  Generally, the effect of this guidance will depend on future acquisitions.  However, the accounting for the resolution of any tax uncertainties remaining as of January 30, 2010 related to the Acquisition will be subject to the provisions of this guidance.  As to the future resolution of these tax uncertainties, we do not believe these requirements will have a material impact on our future financial statements.

 

In February 2008, the FASB issued guidance that delays the effective date of fair value disclosures required for all nonfinancial assets, such as intangible assets and goodwill, and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis.  We implemented this guidance in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, however, no additional disclosures were required.

 

In December 2008, the FASB issued guidance related to an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, or our fiscal year ending July 31, 2010.  We have not yet evaluated the impact of adopting the disclosure requirements on our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2010.

 

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance requiring additional disclosures in interim financial statements regarding determining and reporting fair values for certain assets and liabilities.  We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 related to the fair value of our debt instruments.

 

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that establishes the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, or our first quarter of fiscal year 2010

 

6



Table of Contents

 

ending October 31, 2009.  The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

2.              Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

August 1,
2009

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

1,263,433

 

$

1,263,433

 

$

1,320,099

 

Tradenames

 

1,234,735

 

1,235,290

 

1,336,808

 

Customer lists, net

 

341,524

 

368,660

 

395,796

 

Favorable lease commitments, net

 

402,625

 

411,564

 

420,502

 

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

 

$

3,242,317

 

$

3,278,947

 

$

3,473,205

 

 

Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Goodwill.  Indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as tradenames and goodwill, are not subject to amortization. Rather, we assess the recoverability of indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and upon the occurrence of certain events.

 

Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization.  Customer lists and amortizable tradenames are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 5 to 24 years (weighted average life of 13 years).  Favorable lease commitments are amortized straight-line over the remaining lives of the leases, ranging from 6 to 49 years (weighted average life of 33 years).  Total estimated amortization of all acquisition-related intangible assets for the next five fiscal years is currently estimated as follows (in thousands):

 

2011

 

$

62,548

 

2012

 

50,123

 

2013

 

47,436

 

2014

 

46,881

 

2015

 

46,881

 

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets.  We assess the recoverability of indefinite-lived assets and goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year and upon the occurrence of certain events.  In connection with the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, we concluded that it was appropriate to test our long-lived assets for recoverability in light of the significant declines in the domestic and global financial markets during the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2009. Utilizing our then-current operating forecasts to estimate the fair values of our Neiman Marcus stores, Bergdorf Goodman stores and Direct Marketing operation, we determined certain of our property and equipment, tradenames and goodwill to be impaired and recorded impairment charges in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 aggregating $560.1 million.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, we updated our short-term and long-term operating forecasts in connection with our annual planning process in light of our updated expectations of future business conditions and trends.  Utilizing these updated operating forecasts to estimate the fair values of our reporting units, we determined further impairment with respect to certain of our property and equipment, tradenames and goodwill and recorded additional impairment charges in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 aggregating $143.1 million.

 

Total impairment charges recorded in fiscal year 2009 were as follows:

 

(in thousands)

 

Specialty
Retail stores

 

Direct
Marketing

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

$

30,348

 

$

 

$

30,348

 

Tradenames

 

311,835

 

31,374

 

343,209

 

Goodwill

 

329,709

 

 

329,709

 

 

 

$

671,892

 

$

31,374

 

$

703,266

 

 

7



Table of Contents

 

3.              Long-term Debt

 

The significant components of our long-term debt are as follows:

 

(in thousands)

 

Interest
Rate

 

January 30,
2010

 

August 1,
2009

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility

 

variable

 

$

1,598,383

 

$

1,625,000

 

$

1,625,000

 

2028 Debentures

 

7.125%

 

121,394

 

121,297

 

121,199

 

Senior Notes

 

9.0%/9.75%

 

752,445

 

734,541

 

700,000

 

Senior Subordinated Notes

 

10.375%

 

500,000

 

500,000

 

500,000

 

Total debt

 

 

 

2,972,222

 

2,980,838

 

2,946,199

 

Less: current portion of Senior Secured Term Loan Facility

 

 

 

 

(26,617

)

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

$

2,972,222

 

$

2,954,221

 

$

2,946,199

 

 

Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  On July 15, 2009, NMG amended and restated the terms of its prior asset-based revolving credit facility (which had been scheduled to mature on October 6, 2010).  The terms of the amended and restated Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility include a scheduled maturity date of January 15, 2013 and a maximum committed borrowing capacity of $600.0 million (the same amount as the prior facility).  The new facility also provides an uncommitted accordion feature that allows NMG to request the lenders to provide additional capacity in either the form of increased revolving commitments or incremental term loans, subject to a potential total maximum facility of $800 million.

 

The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility provides committed financing of up to $600.0 million, subject to a borrowing base.  The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility includes borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and for borrowings on same-day notice.  The borrowing base for the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility is equal to at any time the sum of (a) the lesser of (i) 80% of eligible inventory (valued at the lower of cost or market value) and (ii) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, and (b) 85% of the amounts owed by credit card processors in respect of eligible credit card accounts constituting proceeds arising from the sale or disposition of inventory, less certain reserves.  Through April 30, 2011, NMG is required to maintain excess availability under the terms of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility of at least the greater of (a) 10% of the lesser of (i) the aggregate revolving commitments and (ii) the borrowing base and (b) $50 million.  After April 30, 2011, if at any time, excess availability is less than the greater of (a) 15% of the lesser of (i) the aggregate revolving commitments and (ii) the borrowing base and (b) $60 million, NMG will be required to maintain a pro forma ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated Fixed Charges (as such terms are defined in the credit agreement) of at least 1.1 to 1.0.  On January 30, 2010, NMG had no borrowings outstanding under this facility, $31.1 million of outstanding letters of credit and $430.1 million of unused borrowing availability.

 

The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility provides that NMG has the right at any time to request up to $300 million of additional revolving facility commitments and/or incremental term loans; provided that the aggregate amount of loan commitments under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility may not exceed $800 million. However, the lenders are under no obligation to provide any such additional commitments or loans, and any increase in commitments or incremental term loans will be subject to customary conditions precedent.  If NMG were to request any such additional commitments and the existing lenders or new lenders were to agree to provide such commitments, the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility size could be increased to up to $800 million, but NMG’s ability to borrow would still be limited by the amount of the borrowing base. Incremental term loans may be exchanged by NMG for any of NMG’s existing senior notes and senior subordinated notes, or the cash proceeds of any incremental term loans may be used to repurchase any of such notes, but neither the incremental term loans nor the proceeds thereof may be used for any other purpose.

 

Borrowings under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at NMG’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) a defined prime rate, (ii) the federal funds effective rate plus 1/2 of 1% or (iii) a one-month LIBOR rate plus 1% or (b) a LIBOR rate, subject to certain adjustments, in each case plus an applicable margin.  The applicable margin is up to 3.50% with respect to base rate borrowings and up to 4.50% with respect to LIBOR borrowings, provided that until October 1, 2010, the applicable margin will be 3.25% with respect to base rate borrowings and 4.25% with respect to LIBOR borrowings. The applicable margin is subject to adjustment based on the historical availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, NMG is required to pay a commitment fee in respect of unused commitments of (a) 0.750% per annum during any applicable period in which the average revolving loan

 

8



Table of Contents

 

utilization is 50% or more or (b) 1% per annum during any applicable period in which the average revolving loan utilization is less than 50%.  NMG must also pay customary letter of credit fees and agency fees.

 

If at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding revolving loans, unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn letters of credit under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility exceeds the lesser of (a) the commitment amount and (b) the borrowing base (including as a result of reductions to the borrowing base that would result from certain non-ordinary course sales of inventory with a value in excess of $25 million, if applicable), NMG will be required to repay outstanding loans or cash collateralize letters of credit in an aggregate amount equal to such excess, with no reduction of the commitment amount.  In addition, if at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding revolving loans and incremental term loans, unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn letters of credit under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility exceeds the reported value of inventory owned by the borrowers and guarantors, NMG will be required to eliminate such excess within the earlier of 30 days from such occurrence or 5 business days from the first date on or after such occurrence at which excess availability is less than $75 million.  If (a) the amount available under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility is less than the greater of (i) 20% of the lesser of (A) the aggregate revolving commitments and (B) the borrowing base and (ii) $75 million or (b) an event of default has occurred, NMG will be required to repay outstanding loans and cash collateralize letters of credit with the cash NMG would then be required to deposit daily in a collection account maintained with the agent under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.

 

NMG may voluntarily reduce the unutilized portion of the commitment amount and repay outstanding loans at any time without premium or penalty other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans.  There is no scheduled amortization under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility; the principal amount of the revolving loans outstanding thereunder will be due and payable in full on January 15, 2013.

 

All obligations under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility are guaranteed by the Company and certain of NMG’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries.  All obligations under NMG’s Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, and the guarantees of those obligations, are secured, subject to certain significant exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of the Company, NMG and the subsidiaries that have guaranteed the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility (subsidiary guarantors). As of January 30, 2010, there were no assets or liabilities held by non-guarantor subsidiaries.

 

The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility contains covenants (which are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009), including covenants limiting dividends and other restricted payments; investments, loans, advances and acquisitions; and prepayments or redemptions of other indebtedness. These covenants permit the restricted actions in an unlimited amount, subject to the satisfaction of certain payment conditions, principally that NMG must have pro forma excess availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility equal to at least 25% of the lesser of (a) the revolving commitments under the facility and (b) the borrowing base, NMG delivering projections demonstrating that projected excess availability for the next twelve months will be equal to such thresholds and that NMG have a pro forma ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated Fixed Charges (as such terms are defined in the credit agreement) of at least 1.2 to 1.0 (or 1.1 to 1.0 for prepayments or redemptions of other indebtedness).  The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility also contains customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including a cross-default provision in respect of any other indebtedness that has an aggregate principal amount exceeding $50 million.

 

For a more detailed description of NMG’s Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  In October 2005, NMG entered into a credit agreement and related security and other agreements for a $1,975.0 million Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  At January 30, 2010, the outstanding balance under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was $1,598.4 million.  The principal amount of the loans outstanding is due and payable in full on April 6, 2013.

 

At January 30, 2010, borrowings under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to, at NMG’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the higher of (1) the prime rate of Credit Suisse and (2) the federal funds effective rate plus 1/2 of 1% or (b) a LIBOR rate, subject to certain adjustments, in each case plus an applicable margin. The interest rate on the outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was 2.26% at January 30, 2010.  The applicable margin is subject to adjustment based on contractually defined debt coverage ratios.  At January 30, 2010, the applicable margin with respect to base rate borrowings was 1.00% and the applicable margin with respect to LIBOR borrowings was 2.00%.

 

9



Table of Contents

 

The credit agreement governing the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility requires NMG to prepay outstanding term loans with 50% (which percentage will be reduced to 25% if NMG’s total leverage ratio is less than a specified ratio and will be reduced to 0% if NMG’s total leverage ratio is less than a specified ratio) of its annual excess cash flow (as defined in the credit agreement). For fiscal year 2009, NMG was required to prepay $26.6 million of outstanding term loans in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 pursuant to the annual excess cash flow requirements.  If a change of control (as defined in the credit agreement) occurs, NMG will be required to offer to prepay all outstanding term loans, at a prepayment price equal to 101% of the principal amount to be prepaid, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of prepayment. NMG also must offer to prepay outstanding term loans at 100% of the principal amount to be prepaid, plus accrued and unpaid interest, with the proceeds of certain asset sales under certain circumstances.

 

NMG may voluntarily prepay outstanding loans under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility at any time without premium or penalty other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans. There is no scheduled amortization under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.

 

All obligations under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by the Company and each direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of NMG that guarantees the obligations of NMG under its Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility. All obligations under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, and the guarantees of those obligations, are secured, subject to certain significant exceptions, by substantially all of the assets of the Company, NMG and the subsidiary guarantors.

 

The credit agreement governing the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility contains a number of negative covenants that are substantially similar to those governing the Senior Notes and additional covenants related to the security arrangements for the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility. The credit agreement also contains customary affirmative covenants and events of default, including a cross-default provision in respect of any other indebtedness that has an aggregate principal amount exceeding $50 million.

 

For a more detailed description of the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

The fair value of the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was approximately $1,454.5 million at January 30, 2010, $1,332.5 million at August 1, 2009 and $1,113.1 million at January 31, 2009 based on prevailing market rates at this time.

 

2028 Debentures.  In May 1998, NMG issued $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.125% 2028 Debentures. NMG equally and ratably secures its 2028 Debentures by a first lien security interest on certain collateral subject to liens granted under NMG’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities. The 2028 Debentures are guaranteed on an unsecured, senior basis by the Company.  The 2028 Debentures are not guaranteed by certain subsidiaries of NMG.  The 2028 Debentures include a cross-acceleration provision in respect of any other indebtedness that has an aggregate principal amount exceeding $15 million.  NMG’s 2028 Debentures mature on June 1, 2028.

 

For a more detailed description of the 2028 Debentures, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

The fair value of the 2028 Debentures was approximately $109.4 million at January 30, 2010, $95.6 million at August 1, 2009 and $62.5 million at January 31, 2009 based on quoted market prices.

 

Senior Notes.  NMG has $752.4 million aggregate principal amount of 9.0% / 9.75% Senior Notes under a senior indenture (Senior Indenture).  NMG’s Senior Notes mature on October 15, 2015.

 

Interest on the Senior Notes is payable quarterly in arrears on each January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15.  For any interest payment period through October 15, 2010, NMG may, at its option, elect to pay interest on the Senior Notes entirely in cash (Cash Interest) or entirely by increasing the principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes by issuing additional Senior Notes (PIK Interest). Cash Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at the rate of 9% per annum. PIK Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at the rate of 9.75% per annum. We negotiated for the right to include the PIK feature in our Senior Notes because of our belief that this feature could be a useful tool to enhance liquidity under appropriate circumstances. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, given the dislocation in the financial markets and the uncertainty as to when reasonable conditions would return, we believed that it was appropriate to utilize this feature, even though we had available borrowing capacity under our $600.0 million revolving credit facility. Accordingly, we elected to pay PIK Interest for the three quarterly interest periods ending October 14, 2009 and to make such interest payments with the issuance of additional Senior Notes at the PIK Interest rate of

 

10



Table of Contents

 

9.75% instead of paying interest in cash.  As a result, the original principal amount of Senior Notes of $700.0 million increased by $17.1 million on April 14, 2009, $17.4 million on July 14, 2009 and $17.9 million on October 14, 2009.

 

For the quarterly interest periods ending on January 15, 2010 and April 15, 2010, we elected to pay cash interest.  Prior to the beginning of each eligible interest period in the future, we will evaluate whether to continue utilizing this PIK feature, taking into account market conditions and other relevant factors at that time. After October 15, 2010, we are required to make all interest payments on the Senior Notes entirely in cash.

 

The Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several unsecured, senior basis, by each of NMG’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries that guarantee NMG’s obligations under its Senior Secured Credit Facilities and by the Company. The Senior Notes and the guarantees thereof are NMG’s and the guarantors’ unsecured, senior obligations and rank (i) equal in the right of payment with all of NMG’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness, including any borrowings under NMG’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities and the guarantees thereof and NMG’s 2028 Debentures; and (ii) senior to all of NMG’s and its guarantors’ existing and future subordinated indebtedness, including the Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 and the guarantees thereof. The Senior Notes also are effectively junior in priority to NMG’s and its guarantors’ obligations under all secured indebtedness, including NMG’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the 2028 Debentures, and any other secured obligations of NMG, in each case, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such obligations. In addition, the Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities, including trade payables, of NMG’s subsidiaries that are not providing guarantees.

 

NMG is not required to make any mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the Senior Notes.  The indenture governing the Senior Notes contains a number of customary negative covenants and events of default, including a cross-default provision in respect of any other indebtedness that has an aggregate principal amount exceeding $50 million, which, if any of them occurs, would permit or require the principal, premium, if any, interest and any other monetary obligations on all outstanding Senior Notes to be due and payable immediately.

 

For a more detailed description of NMG’s Senior Notes, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

The fair value of NMG’s Senior Notes was approximately $731.8 million at January 30, 2010, $539.9 million at August 1, 2009 and $308.0 million at January 31, 2009 based on quoted market prices.

 

Senior Subordinated Notes.  NMG has $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10.375% Senior Subordinated Notes under a senior subordinated indenture (Senior Subordinated Indenture). NMG’s Senior Subordinated Notes mature on October 15, 2015.

 

The Senior Subordinated Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several unsecured, senior subordinated basis, by each of NMG’s wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries that guarantee NMG’s obligations under its Senior Secured Credit Facilities and by the Company. The Senior Subordinated Notes and the guarantees thereof are NMG’s and the guarantors’ unsecured, senior subordinated obligations and rank (i) junior to all of NMG’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness, including the Senior Notes and any borrowings under NMG’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities, and the guarantees thereof and NMG’s 2028 Debentures; (ii) equally with any of NMG’s and the guarantors’ future senior subordinated indebtedness; and (iii) senior to any of NMG’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated indebtedness. In addition, the Senior Subordinated Notes are structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities, including trade payables, of NMG’s subsidiaries that are not providing guarantees.

 

NMG is not required to make any mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the Senior Subordinated Notes. The indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes contains a number of customary negative covenants and events of defaults, including a cross-default provision in respect of any other indebtedness that has an aggregate principal amount exceeding $50 million, which, if any of them occurs, would permit or require the principal, premium, if any, interest and any other monetary obligations on all outstanding Senior Subordinated Notes to be due and payable immediately, subject to certain exceptions.

 

For a more detailed description of NMG’s Senior Subordinated Notes, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

The fair value of NMG’s Senior Subordinated Notes was approximately $491.3 million at January 30, 2010, $355.0 million at August 1, 2009 and $230.0 million at January 31, 2009 based on quoted market prices.

 

11



Table of Contents

 

Maturities of Long-Term Debt.  At January 30, 2010, annual maturities of long-term debt during the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows (in millions):

 

2011

 

$

 

2012

 

 

2013

 

1,598.4

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

Thereafter

 

1,373.8

 

 

The above table does not reflect either future excess cash flow prepayments, if any, that may be required under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility or any future PIK Interest election that we may make through October 15, 2010.

 

Interest expense.  The significant components of interest expense are as follows:

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility

 

$

20,787

 

$

23,941

 

$

41,573

 

$

47,871

 

2028 Debentures

 

2,207

 

2,227

 

4,433

 

4,453

 

Senior Notes

 

16,744

 

15,711

 

34,269

 

31,461

 

Senior Subordinated Notes

 

12,969

 

13,122

 

25,795

 

26,091

 

Amortization of debt issue costs

 

4,679

 

3,554

 

9,340

 

7,109

 

Other

 

1,770

 

865

 

3,480

 

1,691

 

Total interest expense

 

59,156

 

59,420

 

118,890

 

118,676

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

152

 

666

 

328

 

1,771

 

Capitalized interest

 

 

173

 

193

 

479

 

Interest expense, net

 

$

59,004

 

$

58,581

 

$

118,369

 

$

116,426

 

 

4.              Derivative Financial Instruments

 

Interest Rate Swaps.  In connection with the Acquisition, we obtained $2,575.0 million of floating rate debt agreements, of which $2,125.0 million was outstanding at the Acquisition date and $1,598.4 million is outstanding at January 30, 2010.  Effective December 6, 2005, NMG entered into floating to fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $1,000.0 million to limit our exposure to interest rate increases related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness.  These swap agreements hedge a portion of our contractual floating rate interest commitments through the expiration of the agreements in December 2010.  As a result of the swap agreements, NMG’s effective fixed interest rates as to the $1,000.0 million in floating rate indebtedness will currently range from 6.882% to 6.983% per quarter through 2010 and result in an average fixed rate of 6.930%.

 

As of the effective date, NMG designated the interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges. As cash flow hedges, unrealized gains on our outstanding interest rate swaps are recognized as assets while unrealized losses are recognized as liabilities.  Our interest rate swap agreements are highly, but not perfectly, correlated to the changes in interest rates to which we are exposed.  As a result, unrealized gains and losses on our interest rate swap agreements are designated as effective or ineffective.  The effective portion of such gains or losses is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss while the ineffective portion of such gains or losses is recorded as a component of interest expense.

 

In addition, we realize a gain or loss on our interest rate swap agreements in connection with each required interest payment on our floating rate indebtedness.  These realized gains or losses are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense.  The realized gains and losses effectively adjust the contractual interest requirements pursuant to the terms of our floating rate indebtedness to the interest requirements at the fixed rates established in the interest rate swaps agreements.  The cash flows from our interest rate swaps are recorded in operating activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

Interest Rate Caps.  In addition to interest rate swap agreements, we also use interest rate cap agreements to manage our floating rate debt.  Effective January 19, 2010, NMG entered into interest rate cap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $500.0 million in order to hedge the variability of our cash flows related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness once the interest rate swap expires on December 6, 2010.  The interest rate cap agreements commence on December 6, 2010 and expire on December 6, 2012.  Pursuant to the interest rate cap agreements, NMG has capped LIBOR at 2.50% through December 6, 2012 with respect to the $500.0 million notional amount of such agreements.  In the event LIBOR is less than 2.5%, NMG will pay interest at the lower LIBOR rate.  In the event LIBOR is higher than 2.5%, NMG will pay interest at the capped rate of 2.5%.

 

At each balance sheet date, the interest rate caps are recorded at estimated fair value.  Changes in the fair value of the cap are expected to be highly effective in offsetting the unpredictability in expected future cash flows on floating rate indebtedness attributable to fluctuations in LIBOR interest rates above 2.50%.  Unrealized gains and losses on the outstanding balances of the interest rate caps are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss.  Gains and losses realized at the time of our quarterly interest payments due to the expiration of applicable portions of the interest rate caps are reclassified to interest expense.

 

Fair Value.  The fair values of the interest rate swaps and interest rate caps are estimated using industry standard valuation models using market-based observable inputs including interest rate curves (Level 2).  A summary of the recorded assets (liabilities) with respect to our derivative financial instruments included in our condensed consolidated balance sheets is as follows:

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

August 1,
2009

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate caps (included in other long-term assets)

 

$

6,114

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps (included in other current liabilities)

 

$

(45,479

)

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps (included in other long-term liabilities)

 

$

 

$

(57,750

)

$

(61,670

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes

 

$

28,290

 

$

35,508

 

$

38,114

 

 

A summary of the recorded amounts related to our interest rate swaps reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations are as follows:

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized hedging losses — included in interest expense, net

 

$

11,422

 

$

5,967

 

$

22,520

 

$

11,078

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ineffective hedging losses — included in interest expense, net

 

$

213

 

$

154

 

$

429

 

$

291

 

 

The amount of losses recorded in other comprehensive loss at January 30, 2010 that is expected to be reclassified into interest expense in the next twelve months, if interest rates remain unchanged, is approximately $45.5 million.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

5.              Employee Benefit Plans

 

Description of Benefit Plans.  We sponsor a defined benefit pension plan (Pension Plan) and an unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP Plan) which provides certain employees additional pension benefits. Benefits under both plans are based on the employees’ years of service and compensation over defined periods of employment.  We froze benefits offered under our Pension Plan and SERP Plan effective December 31, 2007.  Retirees and active employees hired prior to March 1, 1989 are eligible for certain limited postretirement health care benefits (Postretirement Plan) if they meet certain service and minimum age requirements.

 

We also maintain defined contribution plans consisting of a 401(k) Plan, a retirement savings plan (RSP) and defined contribution supplemental executive retirement plan (Defined Contribution SERP Plan).  Employees make contributions to the 401(k) Plan and RSP and we match an employee’s contribution up to a maximum of 6% of the employee’s compensation subject to statutory limitations for a potential maximum match of 50% of employee contributions to the 401(k) Plan and 75% of employee contributions to the RSP. We also sponsor an unfunded key employee deferred compensation plan, which provides certain employees with additional benefits.

 

Benefit Obligations.  Obligations for our employee benefit plans, included in other long-term liabilities, are as follows:

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

August 1,
2009

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension Plan

 

$

159,156

 

$

156,001

 

$

153,968

 

SERP Plan

 

94,040

 

92,152

 

87,863

 

Postretirement Plan

 

17,855

 

17,920

 

20,150

 

 

 

271,051

 

266,073

 

261,981

 

Less: current portion

 

(5,069

)

(5,069

)

(4,165

)

Long-term portion of benefit obligations

 

$

265,982

 

$

261,004

 

$

257,816

 

 

As of January 30, 2010, we have $69.0 million (net of taxes of $44.8 million) of adjustments to our benefit obligations recorded as increases to accumulated other comprehensive loss.

 

Costs of Benefits.  The components of the expenses we incurred under our Pension Plan, SERP Plan and Postretirement Plan are as follows:

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

Pension Plan:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

 

$

1,429

 

$

1,444

 

$

2,857

 

$

2,875

 

Interest cost

 

6,329

 

5,932

 

12,659

 

11,970

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(6,463

)

(6,373

)

(12,925

)

(12,880

)

Net amortization of losses

 

282

 

 

564

 

 

Pension Plan expense

 

$

1,577

 

$

1,003

 

$

3,155

 

$

1,965

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SERP Plan:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

 

$

171

 

$

164

 

$

342

 

$

326

 

Interest cost

 

1,377

 

1,302

 

2,755

 

2,638

 

SERP Plan expense

 

$

1,548

 

$

1,466

 

$

3,097

 

$

2,964

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Postretirement Plan:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

 

$

18

 

$

23

 

$

36

 

$

46

 

Interest cost

 

254

 

336

 

508

 

672

 

Net amortization of prior service cost

 

(172

)

 

(343

)

 

Net amortization of losses

 

90

 

70

 

179

 

141

 

Postretirement Plan expense

 

$

190

 

$

429

 

$

380

 

$

859

 

 

14



Table of Contents

 

Funding Policy and Plan Assets.  Our policy is to fund the Pension Plan at or above the minimum required by law. In fiscal year 2009, we were not required to make contributions to the Pension Plan; however, we made a voluntary $15.0 million contribution to our Pension Plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009.  In March 2010, we made an additional voluntary $15.0 million contribution to our Pension Plan.  Based upon currently available information, we will not be required to make contributions to the Pension Plan during fiscal year 2010.  However, we will continue to evaluate voluntary contributions to our Pension Plan based upon the unfunded position of the Pension Plan, our available liquidity and other factors.

 

6.              Income Taxes

 

Our effective income tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was 51.2% compared to 21.8% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  Our effective income tax rate for year-to-date fiscal 2010 was 47.1% compared to 20.9% for year-to-date fiscal 2009.  No income tax benefit exists related to the $291.1 million of goodwill impairment charges recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  Excluding the impact of the goodwill impairment charges, our effective income tax rate was 39.4% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 and 39.0% for year-to-date fiscal 2009.  Increases in our effective tax rates for the second quarter and year-to-date fiscal 2010 periods compared to the corresponding periods in fiscal year 2009 are primarily attributable to the relative significance of non-taxable income and non-deductible expenses to our estimated taxable loss in the current year.

 

At January 30, 2010, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $6.9 million, all of which would impact our effective tax rate, if recognized.  We classify interest and penalties as a component of income tax expense (benefit) and our liability for accrued interest and penalties was $6.2 million as of January 30, 2010.

 

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and local jurisdictions.  During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, we closed the IRS examination of fiscal years 2005 and 2006 and received net refunds of approximately $2.8 million.  In addition, as a result of the completion of the audit and IRS determination regarding certain deductions taken in connection with the Acquisition, we recorded a decrease in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits of $13.7 million and a decrease in accrued interest and penalties of $2.2 million. This $15.9 million reduction in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulted in a decrease to goodwill of $17.3 million and a tax benefit of $1.3 million, offset by a decrease to deferred tax liabilities of $2.7 million.

 

The IRS is examining our federal tax return for fiscal year 2007.  We believe our recorded tax liabilities as of January 30, 2010 are sufficient to cover any potential assessments to be made by the IRS upon the completion of their examination. We will continue to monitor the progress of the IRS examination and review our recorded tax liabilities for potential audit assessments.  With respect to state and local jurisdictions, with limited exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax audits for fiscal years before 2005.  We believe it is reasonably possible that additional adjustments in the amounts of our unrecognized tax benefits could occur within the next twelve months as a result of settlements with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitation.  At this time, we do not believe such adjustments will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

7.              Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company has approved equity-based management arrangements which authorize equity awards to be granted to certain management employees for up to 87,992 shares of the common stock of the Company.  Options generally vest over four to five years and expire eight to ten years from the date of grant.

 

The exercise prices of approximately 50% of our options escalate at a 10% compound rate per year (Accreting Options) until the earlier to occur of (i) exercise, (ii) a defined anniversary of the date of grant (four to five years) or (iii) the occurrence of a change in control. However, in the event the Sponsors cause the sale of shares of the Company to an unaffiliated entity, the exercise price will cease to accrete at the time of the sale with respect to a pro rata portion of the accreting options.  The exercise price with respect to all other options (Fixed Price Options) is fixed at the grant date.

 

Stock Option Modification.  In the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Compensation Committee approved 1) a tender offer for outstanding Accreting Options to purchase 26,614 shares (Eligible Options), 2) the extension of the option term with respect to Fixed Price Options for 25,236 shares to October 6, 2017 and 3) the modification of additional Fixed Price Options to purchase 1,378 shares (collectively, the Modification Transactions).  The Modification Transactions were taken in response to

 

15



Table of Contents

 

declines in capital markets and general economic conditions that have resulted in the exercise prices for these options to be in excess of the estimated fair value of our common stock.

 

In connection with the tender offer to purchase certain Accreting Options, option holders were allowed to tender their Eligible Options for new options at an exchange rate of 1.5 Eligible Options to 1.0 new option.  The new options issued 1) have an initial exercise price of $1,000 per share which exercise price will escalate at a 10% compound rate per year through the fourth anniversary of the grant date, 2) vest over four years and 3) expire eight years after the grant date.  The tender offer was completed in December 2009 with the tender of all Eligible Options and the issuance of 17,743 new options.

 

In connection with the Modification Transactions, we incurred additional compensation charges aggregating $1.8 million to recognize the excess of the post-modification fair value of vested options over the pre-modification fair value of such options.

 

The Compensation Committee is still considering modifications with respect to Accreting Options and Fixed Price Options for an additional 23,054 shares, which were not part of the programs described above.

 

Outstanding Stock Options.  A summary of the status of our stock option plan is as follows:

 

 

 

January 30, 2010

 

August 1, 2009

 

January 31, 2009

 

 

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

79,399

 

$

1,585

 

83,147

 

$

1,507

 

83,147

 

$

1,507

 

Granted

 

25,911

 

1,024

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

 

(855

)

1,684

 

(855

)

1,684

 

Cancelled

 

(27,992

)

2,137

 

 

 

(2,481

)

1,606

 

Forfeited

 

(3,116

)

1,684

 

(2,893

)

1,617

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

74,202

 

$

1,268

 

79,399

 

$

1,585

 

79,811

 

$

1,585

 

Options exercisable at end of period

 

44,051

 

$

1,395

 

60,857

 

$

1,542

 

55,946

 

$

1,527

 

 

At January 30, 2010, Accreting Options were outstanding for 29,640 shares and Fixed Price Options were outstanding for 44,562 shares.

 

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Options.  All grants of stock options have an exercise price equaling or exceeding the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.  Because we are privately held and there is no public market for our common stock, the fair market value of our common stock is determined by our Compensation Committee at the time option grants are awarded (Level 3 determination of fair value).  In determining the fair value of our common stock, the Compensation Committee considers such factors as the Company’s actual and projected financial results, the principal amount of the Company’s indebtedness, valuations of the Company performed by third parties and other factors it believes are material to the valuation process.

 

We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of our options as of the date of grant.  A summary of our fiscal year 2010 grants and fair value assumptions is as follows:

 

 

 

Options Issued in
Connection with
Modification Transactions

 

Other Grants

 

 

 

Fixed Price
Options

 

Accreting
Options

 

Fixed Price
Options

 

Accreting
Options

 

Options Granted

 

1,378

 

17,743

 

3,395

 

3,395

 

Exercise Price at January 30, 2010

 

$

1,445

 

$

1,000

 

$

1,000

 

$

1,000

 

Term

 

8

 

8

 

8

 

8

 

Volatility

 

53.4

%

53.4

%

53.4

%

53.4

%

Risk-Free Rate

 

3.3

%

3.3

%

3.3

%

3.3

%

Dividend Yield

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

$

465

 

$

462

 

$

541

 

$

462

 

 

Expected volatility is based on a combination of NMG’s historical volatility adjusted for our leverage and estimates of implied volatility of our peer group.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

We recognize compensation expense for stock options on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.  We recognized non-cash stock compensation expense of $2.4 million in year-to-date fiscal 2010 and $3.0 million in year-to-date fiscal 2009, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses.  At January 30, 2010, unearned non-cash stock-based compensation that we expect to recognize as expense through fiscal year 2015 aggregates approximately $7.7 million.

 

8.              Transactions with Sponsors

 

Pursuant to a management services agreement with affiliates of the Sponsors, and in exchange for on-going consulting and management advisory services that are provided to us by the Sponsors and their affiliates, affiliates of the Sponsors receive an aggregate annual management fee equal to the lesser of (i) 0.25% of our consolidated annual revenues or (ii) $10 million. Affiliates of the Sponsors also receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them or their affiliates in connection with services provided pursuant to the agreement. These management fees are payable quarterly in arrears.  We recorded management fees of $4.9 million during year-to-date fiscal 2010 and $5.2 million during year-to-date fiscal 2009, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

The management services agreement also provides that affiliates of the Sponsors may receive future fees in connection with certain future financing and acquisition or disposition transactions. The management services agreement includes customary exculpation and indemnification provisions in favor of the Sponsors and their affiliates.

 

9.              Income from Credit Card Program, Net

 

In June 2005, we entered into a marketing and servicing alliance with HSBC.  Pursuant to the agreement with HSBC (Program Agreement), HSBC offers credit cards and non-card payment plans and bears substantially all credit risk with respect to sales transacted on the cards bearing our brands. We receive ongoing payments from HSBC related to credit card sales and compensation for marketing and servicing activities (HSBC Program Income).  We recognize HSBC Program Income when earned.

 

The Program Agreement, as amended, provides for 1) the allocation between HSBC and NMG of additional income, if any, to be generated from the credit card program as a result of certain changes made to the terms of credit extended to our customers since the inception of the Program Agreement and 2) the allocation of certain credit card losses between HSBC and NMG.  Our reserve for credit card net losses aggregated $1.5 million as of January 30, 2010, $3.5 million as of August 1, 2009 and $6.0 million as of January 31, 2009, which is included in accrued liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

 

The Program Agreement expires in July 2010.  We are currently in negotiations with HSBC and other providers with respect to a replacement to the Program Agreement.  Based upon current market conditions, we believe the future income to the Company pursuant to any replacement arrangement will be lower than the current HSBC Program Income earned pursuant to the Program Agreement.

 

10.       Commitments and Contingencies

 

Long-term Incentive Plan.  The Company has a long-term incentive plan (Long-term Incentive Plan) that provides for a cash incentive payable to certain employees upon a change of control, as defined, subject to the attainment of certain performance objectives.  Performance objectives and targets are based on cumulative EBITDA percentages for three year periods beginning in fiscal year 2006.  Earned awards for each completed performance period will be credited to a book account and will earn interest at a contractually defined annual rate until the award is paid.  Awards will be paid within 30 days of a change of control or the first day there is a public market of at least 20% of our total outstanding common stock.  As of January 30, 2010, the vested participant balance in the Long-Term Incentive Plan aggregated $5.2 million.

 

Cash Incentive Plan.  The Company also has a cash incentive plan (Cash Incentive Plan) to aid in the retention of certain key executives.  The Cash Incentive Plan provides for the creation of a $14 million cash bonus pool. Each participant in the Cash Incentive Plan will be entitled to a cash bonus upon the earlier to occur of a change of control or an initial public offering, as defined in the Cash Incentive Plan, provided that the internal rate of return to the Sponsors is positive.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

Litigation.  We are currently involved in various legal actions and proceedings that arose in the ordinary course of business. We believe that any liability arising as a result of these actions and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

11.       Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 

The following table shows the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss (amounts are recorded net of related income taxes):

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

August 1,
2009

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on financial instruments

 

$

(28,290

)

$

(35,508

)

$

(38,114

)

Change in unfunded benefit obligations

 

(69,011

)

(69,011

)

(60,221

)

Other

 

 

(68

)

(171

)

Total accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

$

(97,301

)

$

(104,587

)

$

(98,506

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss) from condensed consolidated statements of operations

 

$

12,485

 

$

(496,378

)

 

 

 

Change in unrealized loss on financial instruments

 

7,218

 

(16,359

)

 

 

 

Change in unfunded benefit obligations

 

 

(72,523

)

 

 

 

Other

 

68

 

(460

)

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss) for the period

 

$

19,771

 

$

(585,720

)

 

 

 

 

12.       Segment Reporting

 

We have identified two reportable segments: Specialty Retail stores and Direct Marketing. The Specialty Retail stores segment aggregates the activities of our Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman retail stores, including Neiman Marcus clearance stores. The Direct Marketing segment conducts both online and print catalog operations under the Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman and Horchow brand names.  Both the Specialty Retail stores and Direct Marketing segments derive their revenues from the sales of high-end fashion apparel, accessories, cosmetics and fragrances from leading designers, precious and fashion jewelry and decorative home accessories.

 

Operating earnings (loss) for the segments include 1) revenues, 2) cost of sales, 3) direct selling, general, and administrative expenses, 4) other direct operating expenses, 5) income from credit card program and 6) depreciation expense for the respective segment.  Items not allocated to our operating segments include those items not considered by management in measuring the assets and profitability of our segments. These amounts include 1) corporate expenses including, but not limited to, treasury, investor relations, legal and finance support services, and general corporate management, 2) charges related to the application of purchase accounting adjustments made in connection with the Acquisition including amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments and other non-cash items and 3) interest expense.  These items, while often related to the operations of a segment, are not considered by segment operating management, corporate operating management and the chief operating decision maker in assessing segment operating performance.  The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (except with respect to purchase accounting adjustments not allocated to the operating segments).

 

18



Table of Contents

 

The following tables set forth the information for our reportable segments:

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

$

881,138

 

$

870,537

 

$

1,602,757

 

$

1,697,663

 

Direct Marketing

 

221,223

 

208,842

 

368,504

 

367,503

 

Total

 

$

1,102,361

 

$

1,079,379

 

$

1,971,261

 

$

2,065,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EARNINGS (LOSS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

$

66,485

 

$

(9,637

)

$

154,907

 

$

84,799

 

Direct Marketing

 

40,725

 

17,337

 

62,434

 

36,698

 

Corporate expenses

 

(15,372

)

(13,231

)

(29,010

)

(26,921

)

Other expenses (1)

 

(6,393

)

(8,998

)

(9,722

)

(9,488

)

Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments

 

(18,314

)

(18,037

)

(36,630

)

(36,074

)

Impairment charges (2)

 

 

(560,159

)

 

(560,159

)

Total

 

$

67,131

 

$

(592,725

)

$

141,979

 

$

(511,145

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CAPITAL EXPENDITURES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

$

8,575

 

$

27,820

 

$

22,756

 

$

57,646

 

Direct Marketing

 

2,546

 

3,263

 

5,626

 

6,898

 

Total

 

$

11,121

 

$

31,083

 

$

28,382

 

$

64,544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DEPRECIATION EXPENSE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

$

28,921

 

$

32,787

 

$

59,116

 

$

65,735

 

Direct Marketing

 

3,732

 

4,922

 

7,598

 

9,234

 

Other

 

1,769

 

1,403

 

3,491

 

2,742

 

Total

 

$

34,422

 

$

39,112

 

$

70,205

 

$

77,711

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tangible assets of Specialty Retail stores

 

$

1,634,726

 

$

1,849,025

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tangible assets of Direct Marketing

 

143,966

 

154,139

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets related to Specialty Retail stores

 

2,775,749

 

2,988,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intangible assets related to Direct Marketing

 

466,568

 

484,812

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

578,842

 

332,681

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

5,599,851

 

$

5,809,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)         Other expenses consists primarily of costs (primarily professional fees and severance) incurred in connection with cost reductions and corporate initiatives.

 

(2)         Impairment charges recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 consist of pretax charges of 1) $291.1 million for the writedown to fair value of goodwill, 2) $242.2 million for the writedown to fair value of the net carrying value of tradenames and 3) $26.8 million for the writedown to fair value of the net carrying value of certain long-lived assets.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

13.       Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

 

2028 Debentures.  All of NMG’s obligations under the 2028 Debentures are guaranteed by the Company. The guarantee by the Company is full and unconditional and joint and several. Currently, the Company’s non-guarantor subsidiaries consist principally of Bergdorf Goodman, Inc. through which NMG conducts the operations of its Bergdorf Goodman stores and NM Nevada Trust which holds legal title to certain real property and intangible assets used by NMG in conducting its operations. Previously, our non-guarantor subsidiaries also included an operating subsidiary domiciled in Canada providing support services to our Direct Marketing operation through January 2009.

 

The following condensed consolidating financial information represents the financial information of Neiman Marcus, Inc. and its non-guarantor subsidiaries, prepared on the equity basis of accounting. The information is presented in accordance with the requirements of Rule 3-10 under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-X. The financial information may not necessarily be indicative of results of operations, cash flows or financial position had the non-guarantor subsidiaries operated as independent entities.

 

 

 

January 30, 2010

 

(in thousands)

 

Company

 

NMG

 

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

 

$

500,011

 

$

650

 

$

 

$

500,661

 

Merchandise inventories

 

 

651,279

 

81,010

 

 

732,289

 

Other current assets

 

 

84,942

 

11,808

 

 

96,750

 

Total current assets

 

 

1,236,232

 

93,468

 

 

1,329,700

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

831,184

 

116,187

 

 

947,371

 

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

 

 

1,505,654

 

1,736,663

 

 

3,242,317

 

Other assets

 

 

78,650

 

1,813

 

 

80,463

 

Investments in subsidiaries

 

942,861

 

1,834,019

 

 

(2,776,880

)

 

Total assets

 

$

942,861

 

$

5,485,739

 

$

1,948,131

 

$

(2,776,880

)

$

5,599,851

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

 

$

161,882

 

$

28,167

 

$

 

$

190,049

 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

285,797

 

84,478

 

 

370,275

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

45,479

 

 

 

45,479

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

493,158

 

112,645

 

 

605,803

 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

2,972,222

 

 

 

2,972,222

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

684,185

 

 

 

684,185

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

393,313

 

1,467

 

 

394,780

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

 

4,049,720

 

1,467

 

 

4,051,187

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

942,861

 

942,861

 

1,834,019

 

(2,776,880

)

942,861

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

942,861

 

$

5,485,739

 

$

1,948,131

 

$

(2,776,880

)

$

5,599,851

 

 

20



Table of Contents

 

 

 

August 1, 2009

 

(in thousands)

 

Company

 

NMG

 

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

 

$

322,766

 

$

659

 

$

 

$

323,425

 

Merchandise inventories

 

 

676,973

 

78,061

 

 

755,034

 

Other current assets

 

 

133,438

 

9,630

 

 

143,068

 

Total current assets

 

 

1,133,177

 

88,350

 

 

1,221,527

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

870,300

 

122,415

 

 

992,715

 

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

 

 

1,535,834

 

1,743,113

 

 

3,278,947

 

Other assets

 

 

85,983

 

1,854

 

 

87,837

 

Investments in subsidiaries

 

918,835

 

1,868,405

 

 

(2,787,240

)

 

Total assets

 

$

918,835

 

$

5,493,699

 

$

1,955,732

 

$

(2,787,240

)

$

5,581,026

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

 

$

210,219

 

$

23,771

 

$

 

$

233,990

 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

240,750

 

62,136

 

 

302,886

 

Current maturities of long-term liabilities

 

 

26,617

 

 

 

26,617

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

477,586

 

85,907

 

 

563,493

 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

2,954,221

 

 

 

2,954,221

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

697,810

 

 

 

697,810

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

445,247

 

1,420

 

 

446,667

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

 

4,097,278

 

1,420

 

 

4,098,698

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

918,835

 

918,835

 

1,868,405

 

(2,787,240

)

918,835

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

918,835

 

$

5,493,699

 

$

1,955,732

 

$

(2,787,240

)

$

5,581,026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 31, 2009

 

(in thousands)

 

Company

 

NMG

 

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

 

$

221,527

 

$

1,657

 

$

 

$

223,184

 

Merchandise inventories

 

 

744,180

 

96,151

 

 

840,331

 

Other current assets

 

 

159,832

 

10,151

 

 

169,983

 

Total current assets

 

 

1,125,539

 

107,959

 

 

1,233,498

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

901,460

 

129,825

 

 

1,031,285

 

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

 

 

1,610,216

 

1,862,989

 

 

3,473,205

 

Other assets

 

 

69,166

 

1,896

 

 

71,062

 

Investments in subsidiaries

 

1,093,579

 

2,004,967

 

 

(3,098,546

)

 

Total assets

 

$

1,093,579

 

$

5,711,348

 

$

2,102,669

 

$

(3,098,546

)

$

5,809,050

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

 

$

173,182

 

$

22,447

 

$

 

$

195,629

 

Accrued liabilities

 

 

292,503

 

72,906

 

 

365,409

 

Total current liabilities

 

 

465,685

 

95,353

 

 

561,038

 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

2,946,199

 

 

 

2,946,199

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

750,027

 

 

 

750,027

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

 

455,858

 

2,349

 

 

458,207

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

 

4,152,084

 

2,349

 

 

4,154,433

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

1,093,579

 

1,093,579

 

2,004,967

 

(3,098,546

)

1,093,579

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

1,093,579

 

$

5,711,348

 

$

2,102,669

 

$

(3,098,546

)

$

5,809,050

 

 

21



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended January 30, 2010

 

(in thousands)

 

Company

 

NMG

 

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues

 

$

 

$

931,514

 

$

170,847

 

$

 

$

1,102,361

 

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)

 

 

644,390

 

117,095

 

 

761,485

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)

 

 

208,441

 

29,140

 

 

237,581

 

Income from credit card program, net

 

 

(15,248

)

(1,324

)

 

(16,572

)

Depreciation expense

 

 

30,694

 

3,728

 

 

34,422

 

Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments

 

 

15,089

 

3,225

 

 

18,314

 

Operating earnings

 

 

48,148

 

18,983

 

 

67,131

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

59,003

 

1

 

 

59,004

 

Intercompany royalty charges (income)

 

 

53,786

 

(53,786

)

 

 

Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries

 

(3,964

)

(72,768

)

 

76,732

 

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 

3,964

 

8,127

 

72,768

 

(76,732

)

8,127

 

Income tax expense

 

 

4,163

 

 

 

4,163

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

$

3,964

 

$

3,964

 

$

72,768

 

$

(76,732

)

$

3,964

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended January 31, 2009

 

(in thousands)

 

Company

 

NMG

 

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues

 

$

 

$

923,020

 

$

156,359

 

$

 

$

1,079,379

 

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)

 

 

694,798

 

126,605

 

 

821,403

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)

 

 

214,592

 

28,988

 

 

243,580

 

Income from credit card program, net

 

 

(9,023

)

(1,164

)

 

(10,187

)

Depreciation expense

 

 

34,310

 

4,802

 

 

39,112

 

Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments

 

 

15,090

 

2,947

 

 

18,037

 

Impairment charges

 

 

275,871

 

284,288

 

 

560,159

 

Operating loss

 

 

(302,618

)

(290,107

)

 

(592,725

)

Interest expense, net

 

 

58,579

 

2

 

 

58,581

 

Intercompany royalty charges (income)

 

 

58,889

 

(58,889

)

 

 

Equity in loss (earnings) of subsidiaries

 

509,256

 

231,220

 

 

(740,476

)

 

(Loss) earnings before income taxes

 

(509,256

)

(651,306

)

(231,220

)

740,476

 

(651,306

)

Income tax benefit

 

 

(142,050

)

 

 

(142,050

)

Net (loss) earnings

 

$

(509,256

)

$

(509,256

)

$

(231,220

)

$

740,476

 

$

(509,256

)

 

22



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended January 30, 2010

 

(in thousands)

 

Company

 

NMG

 

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues

 

$

 

$

1,647,431

 

$

323,830

 

$

 

$

1,971,261

 

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)

 

 

1,087,945

 

207,764

 

 

1,295,709

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)

 

 

399,504

 

56,893

 

 

456,397

 

Income from credit card program, net

 

 

(27,129

)

(2,530

)

 

(29,659

)

Depreciation expense

 

 

62,528

 

7,677

 

 

70,205

 

Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments

 

 

30,180

 

6,450

 

 

36,630

 

Operating earnings

 

 

94,403

 

47,576

 

 

141,979

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

118,368

 

1

 

 

118,369

 

Intercompany royalty charges (income)

 

 

98,057

 

(98,057

)

 

 

Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries

 

(12,485

)

(145,632

)

 

158,117

 

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 

12,485

 

23,610

 

145,632

 

(158,117

)

23,610

 

Income tax expense

 

 

11,125

 

 

 

11,125

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

$

12,485

 

$

12,485

 

$

145,632

 

$

(158,117

)

$

12,485

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended January 31, 2009

 

(in thousands)

 

Company

 

NMG

 

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues

 

$

 

$

1,740,743

 

$

324,423

 

$

 

$

2,065,166

 

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)

 

 

1,213,886

 

225,260

 

 

1,439,146

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)

 

 

427,744

 

58,664

 

 

486,408

 

Income from credit card program, net

 

 

(20,556

)

(2,631

)

 

(23,187

)

Depreciation expense

 

 

68,625

 

9,086

 

 

77,711

 

Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments

 

 

30,179

 

5,895

 

 

36,074

 

Impairment charges

 

 

275,871

 

284,288

 

 

560,159

 

Operating loss

 

 

(255,006

)

(256,139

)

 

(511,145

)

Interest expense, net

 

 

116,422

 

4

 

 

116,426

 

Intercompany royalty charges (income)

 

 

115,719

 

(115,719

)

 

 

Equity in loss (earnings) of subsidiaries

 

496,378

 

140,424

 

 

(636,802

)

 

(Loss) earnings before income taxes

 

(496,378

)

(627,571

)

(140,424

)

636,802

 

(627,571

)

Income tax benefit

 

 

(131,193

)

 

 

(131,193

)

Net (loss) earnings

 

$

(496,378

)

$

(496,378

)

$

(140,424

)

$

636,802

 

$

(496,378

)

 

23



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended January 30, 2010

 

(in thousands)

 

Company

 

NMG

 

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

CASH FLOWS—OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

$

12,485

 

$

12,485

 

$

145,632

 

$

(158,117

)

$

12,485

 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

 

101,795

 

14,127

 

 

115,922

 

Paid-in-kind interest

 

 

14,362

 

 

 

14,362

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(18,318

)

 

 

(18,318

)

Other, primarily costs related to defined benefit pension and other long-term benefit plans

 

 

2,480

 

88

 

 

2,568

 

Intercompany royalty income payable (receivable)

 

 

98,057

 

(98,057

)

 

 

Equity in (earnings) loss of subsidiaries

 

(12,485

)

(145,632

)

 

158,117

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net

 

 

165,707

 

(60,345

)

 

105,362

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

230,936

 

1,445

 

 

232,381

 

CASH FLOWS—INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

(26,928

)

(1,454

)

 

(28,382

)

Net cash used for investing activities

 

 

(26,928

)

(1,454

)

 

(28,232

)

CASH FLOWS—FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of borrowings

 

 

(26,763

)

 

 

(26,763

)

Net cash used for financing activities

 

 

(26,763

)

 

 

(26,763

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) during the period

 

 

177,245

 

(9

)

 

177,236

 

Beginning balance

 

 

322,766

 

659

 

 

323,425

 

Ending balance

 

$

 

$

500,011

 

$

650

 

$

 

$

500,661

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended January 31, 2009

 

(in thousands)

 

Company

 

NMG

 

Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Consolidated

 

CASH FLOWS—OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) earnings

 

$

(496,378

)

$

(496,378

)

$

(140,424

)

$

636,802

 

$

(496,378

)

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

 

105,913

 

14,981

 

 

120,894

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(122,158

)

 

 

(122,158

)

Impairment charges

 

 

275,871

 

284,288

 

 

560,159

 

Other, primarily costs related to defined benefit pension and other long-term benefit plans

 

 

7,698

 

759

 

 

8,457

 

Intercompany royalty income payable (receivable)

 

 

115,719

 

(115,719

)

 

 

Equity in loss (earnings) of subsidiaries

 

496,378

 

140,424

 

 

(636,802

)

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net

 

 

18,139

 

(39,332

)

 

(21,193

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

45,228

 

4,553

 

 

49,781

 

CASH FLOWS—INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

(60,672

)

(3,872

)

 

(64,544

)

Net cash used for investing activities

 

 

(60,672

)

(3,872

)

 

(64,544

)

CASH FLOWS—FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of borrowings

 

 

(1,233

)

 

 

(1,233

)

Net cash used for financing activities

 

 

(1,233

)

 

 

(1,233

)

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase during the period

 

 

(16,677

)

681

 

 

(15,996

)

Beginning balance

 

 

238,204

 

976

 

 

239,180

 

Ending balance

 

$

 

$

221,527

 

$

1,657

 

$

 

$

223,184

 

 

24



Table of Contents

 

Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes.  All of NMG’s obligations under the Senior Notes and the Senior Subordinated Notes, as well as its obligations under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, are guaranteed by the Company and certain of NMG’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries (principally, Bergdorf Goodman, Inc. through which NMG conducts the operations of its Bergdorf Goodman stores and NM Nevada Trust which holds legal title to certain real property and intangible assets used by the Company in conducting its operations). The guarantees by the Company and each subsidiary guarantor are full and unconditional and joint and several.  Currently, NMG conducts no operations through subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Senior Notes or the Senior Subordinated Notes. Previously, the non-guarantor subsidiaries of NMG included an operating subsidiary domiciled in Canada providing support services to our Direct Marketing operation through January 2009.

 

Information with respect to non-guarantor subsidiaries with respect to the Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes is as follows:

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

August 1,
2009

 

January 31,
2009

 

Total assets

 

$

 

$

332

 

$

1,248

 

Net assets

 

$

 

$

332

 

$

(496

)

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

Revenues

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Net loss

 

(32

)

(433

)

 

(333

)

Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities

 

 

424

 

(34

)

626

 

 

25



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.  Unless otherwise specified, the meanings of all defined terms in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) are consistent with the meanings of such terms as defined in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. This discussion contains forward-looking statements.  Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our forward-looking statements.

 

Overview

 

Neiman Marcus, Inc. (the Company), together with our operating segments and subsidiaries, is a high-end specialty retailer. Our operations include the Specialty Retail stores segment and the Direct Marketing segment. The Specialty Retail stores segment consists primarily of Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman stores. The Direct Marketing segment conducts both online and print catalog operations under the brand names of Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman and Horchow.

 

Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to July 31.  All references to the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 relate to the thirteen weeks ended January 30, 2010.  All references to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 relate to the thirteen weeks ended January 31, 2009.  All references to year-to-date fiscal 2010 relate to the twenty-six weeks ended January 30, 2010.  All references to year-to-date fiscal 2009 relate to the twenty-six weeks ended January 31, 2009.

 

Factors Affecting Our Results

 

Revenues.  We generate our revenues from the sale of high-end merchandise through our Specialty Retail stores and Direct Marketing operation. Components of our revenues include:

 

·                  Sales of merchandise—Revenues from our Specialty Retail stores are recognized at the later of the point of sale or the delivery of goods to the customer. Revenues from our Direct Marketing operation are recognized when the merchandise is delivered to the customer. We maintain reserves for anticipated sales returns primarily based on our historical trends related to returns by both our retail and direct marketing customers. Revenues exclude sales taxes collected from our customers.

 

·                  Delivery and processing—We generate revenues from delivery and processing charges related to merchandise delivered to our customers from both our retail and direct marketing operation.

 

Our revenues can be affected by the following factors:

 

·                  general economic conditions and the prospects for a meaningful recovery in the near-term;

 

·                  changes in the level of consumer spending generally and, specifically, on luxury goods;

 

·                  changes in the level of full-price sales;

 

·                  changes in the level of promotional events conducted by our Specialty Retail stores and Direct Marketing operation;

 

·                  our ability to successfully implement our store expansion and remodeling strategies; and

 

·                  the rate of growth in internet revenues by our Direct Marketing operation.

 

In addition, our revenues are seasonal. For a description of the seasonality of our business, see “Seasonality.”

 

26



Table of Contents

 

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation) (COGS).  COGS consists of the following components:

 

·                  Inventory costs—We utilize the retail method of accounting. Under the retail inventory method, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are determined by applying a calculated cost-to-retail ratio, for various groupings of similar items, to the retail value of our inventories. The cost of the inventory reflected on the consolidated balance sheet is decreased by charges to cost of goods sold at the time the retail value of the inventory is lowered through the use of markdowns. Hence, earnings are negatively impacted when merchandise is marked down. With the introduction of new fashions in the first and third fiscal quarters and our emphasis on full-price selling in these quarters, a lower level of markdowns and higher margins are characteristic of these quarters.

 

·                  Buying costs—Buying costs consist primarily of salaries and expenses incurred by our merchandising and buying operations.

 

·                  Occupancy costs—Occupancy costs consist primarily of rent, property taxes and operating costs of our retail, distribution and support facilities. A significant portion of our buying and occupancy costs are fixed in nature and are not dependent on the revenues we generate.

 

·                  Delivery and processing costs—Delivery and processing costs consist primarily of delivery charges we pay to third-party carriers and other costs related to the fulfillment of customer orders not delivered at the point-of-sale.

 

Consistent with industry business practice, we receive allowances from certain of our vendors in support of the merchandise we purchase for resale. Certain allowances are received to reimburse us for markdowns taken or to support the gross margins that we earn in connection with the sales of the vendor’s merchandise. These allowances result in an increase to gross margin when we earn the allowances and they are approved by the vendor. Other allowances we receive represent reductions to the amounts we pay to acquire the merchandise. These allowances reduce the cost of the acquired merchandise and are recognized at the time the goods are sold. We received vendor allowances of $40.8 million, or 2.1% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2010 and $62.5 million, or 3.0% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2009.  The amounts of vendor allowances we received did not have a significant impact on the year-over-year change in net markdowns or gross margin during year-to-date fiscal years 2010 and 2009.

 

Changes in our COGS as a percentage of revenues can be affected by the following factors:

 

·                  our ability to order an appropriate amount of merchandise to match customer demand and the related impact on the level of net markdowns incurred;

 

·                  customer acceptance of and demand for the merchandise we offer in a given season and the related impact of such factors on the level of full-price sales;

 

·                  factors affecting revenues generally, including pricing strategies, product offerings and other actions taken by competitors;

 

·                  changes in occupancy costs primarily associated with the opening of new stores or distribution facilities; and

 

·                  the amount of vendor reimbursements we receive during the fiscal year.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation) (SG&A).  SG&A principally consists of costs related to employee compensation and benefits in the selling and administrative support areas, advertising and catalog costs and insurance and long-term benefits expenses. A significant portion of our selling, general and administrative expenses are variable in nature and are dependent on the sales we generate.

 

Advertising costs consist primarily of 1) print media costs for promotional materials mailed to our customers incurred by our Specialty Retail segment, 2) advertising costs incurred by our Direct Marketing operation related to the production, printing and distribution of our print catalogs and the production of the photographic content for our websites and 3) online marketing costs incurred by our Direct Marketing operation. We receive advertising allowances from certain of our merchandise vendors. Substantially all the advertising allowances we receive represent reimbursements of direct, specific and incremental costs that we incur to promote the vendor’s merchandise in connection with our various advertising programs, primarily catalogs and other print media.  As a result, advertising allowances are recorded as a reduction of our advertising costs when earned. Advertising allowances aggregated approximately $26.1 million, or 1.3% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2010 and $41.5 million, or 2.0%

 

27



Table of Contents

 

of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2009.  The decrease in advertising allowances in year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to year-to-date fiscal 2009 was consistent with the decrease in gross advertising expenditures in the periods.

 

We also receive allowances from certain merchandise vendors in conjunction with compensation programs for employees who sell the vendor’s merchandise. These allowances are netted against the related compensation expense that we incur. Amounts received from vendors related to compensation programs were $31.4 million, or 1.6% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2010 and $35.4 million, or 1.7% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2009.

 

Changes in our selling, general and administrative expenses are affected primarily by the following factors:

 

·                  changes in the number of sales associates primarily due to new store openings and expansion of existing stores, including increased health care and related benefits expenses;

 

·                  changes in expenses incurred in connection with our advertising and marketing programs; and

 

·                  changes in expenses related to employee benefits due to general economic conditions such as rising health care costs.

 

Income from credit card program, net.  Pursuant to a long-term marketing and servicing alliance with HSBC, HSBC offers credit card and non-card payment plans bearing our brands and we receive 1) ongoing payments from HSBC based on net credit card sales, 2) compensation for marketing and servicing activities, 3) our allocable share of certain income generated from the credit card program and 4) our allocable share of certain credit card losses generated from the credit card portfolio (HSBC Program Income). We recognize HSBC Program Income when earned.  In the future, the HSBC Program Income may be:

 

·                  increased or decreased based upon the level of utilization of our proprietary credit cards by our customers;

 

·                  increased or decreased based upon future changes to our historical credit card program related to, among other things, the interest rates applied to unpaid balances, the assessment of late fees and the level of usage of promotional no-interest credit programs;

 

·                  decreased based upon the level of future services we provide to HSBC;

 

·                  increased for our allocable share of certain income, if any, generated from the credit card program as provided pursuant to our contractual agreement with HSBC, or any subsequent amendment thereto; and

 

·                  decreased for our allocable share of certain credit card losses generated from the credit card portfolio as provided pursuant to our contractual agreement with HSBC, or any subsequent amendment thereto.

 

The Program Agreement expires in July 2010.  We are currently in negotiations with HSBC and other providers with respect to a replacement to the Program Agreement.  Based upon current market conditions, we believe the future income to the Company pursuant to any replacement arrangement will be lower than the current HSBC Program Income earned pursuant to the Program Agreement.

 

28



Table of Contents

 

Seasonality

 

We conduct our selling activities in two primary selling seasons—Fall and Spring. The Fall season is comprised of our first and second fiscal quarters and the Spring season is comprised of our third and fourth fiscal quarters.

 

Our first fiscal quarter is generally characterized by a higher level of full-price sales with a focus on the initial introduction of Fall season fashions. Aggressive in-store marketing activities designed to stimulate customer buying, a lower level of markdowns and higher margins are characteristic of this quarter. The second fiscal quarter is more focused on promotional activities related to the December holiday season, the early introduction of resort season collections from certain designers and the sale of Fall season goods on a marked down basis. As a result, margins are typically lower in the second fiscal quarter. However, due to the seasonal increase in revenues that occurs during the holiday season, the second fiscal quarter is typically the quarter in which our revenues are the highest and in which expenses as a percentage of revenues are the lowest. Our working capital requirements are also the greatest in the first and second fiscal quarters as a result of higher seasonal requirements.

 

Similarly, the third fiscal quarter is generally characterized by a higher level of full-price sales with a focus on the initial introduction of Spring season fashions. Aggressive in-store marketing activities designed to stimulate customer buying, a lower level of markdowns and higher margins are again characteristic of this quarter. Revenues are generally the lowest in the fourth fiscal quarter with a focus on promotional activities offering Spring season goods to the customer on a marked down basis, resulting in lower margins during the quarter. Our working capital requirements are typically lower in the third and fourth fiscal quarters than in the other quarters.

 

A large percentage of our merchandise assortment, particularly in the apparel, fashion accessories and shoe categories, is ordered months in advance of the introduction of such goods. For example, women’s apparel, men’s apparel, shoes and handbags are typically ordered six to nine months in advance of the products being offered for sale while jewelry and other categories are typically ordered three to six months in advance. As a result, inherent in the successful execution of our business plans is our ability both to predict the fashion trends that will be of interest to our customers and to anticipate future spending patterns of our customer base.

 

We monitor the sales performance of our inventories throughout each season. We seek to order additional goods to supplement our original purchasing decisions when the level of customer demand is higher than originally anticipated. However, in certain merchandise categories, particularly fashion apparel, our ability to purchase additional goods can be limited. This can result in lost sales in the event of higher than anticipated demand of the fashion goods we offer or a higher than anticipated level of consumer spending. Conversely, in the event we buy fashion goods that are not accepted by the customer or the level of consumer spending is less than we anticipated, we typically incur a higher than anticipated level of markdowns, net of vendor allowances, resulting in lower operating profits. We believe that the experience of our merchandising and selling organizations helps to minimize the inherent risk in predicting fashion trends.

 

29



Table of Contents

 

OPERATING RESULTS

 

Performance Summary

 

The following table sets forth certain items expressed as percentages of net revenues for the periods indicated.

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

 

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)

 

69.1

 

76.1

 

65.7

 

69.7

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)

 

21.6

 

22.6

 

23.2

 

23.6

 

Income from credit card program, net

 

(1.5

)

(0.9

)

(1.5

)

(1.1

)

Depreciation expense

 

3.1

 

3.6

 

3.6

 

3.8

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

1.3

 

1.3

 

1.4

 

1.3

 

Amortization of favorable lease commitments

 

0.4

 

0.4

 

0.5

 

0.4

 

Impairment charges

 

 

51.9

 

 

27.1

 

Operating earnings (loss)

 

6.1

 

(54.9

)

7.2

 

(24.8

)

Interest expense, net

 

5.4

 

5.4

 

6.0

 

5.6

 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes

 

0.7

 

(60.3

)

1.2

 

(30.4

)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

0.4

 

(13.2

)

0.6

 

(6.4

)

Net earnings (loss)

 

0.4

%

(47.2

)%

0.6

%

(24.0

)%

 

30



Table of Contents

 

Set forth in the following table is certain summary information with respect to our operations for the periods indicated.

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in millions, except sales per square foot)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

$

881.2

 

$

870.6

 

$

1,602.8

 

$

1,697.7

 

Direct Marketing

 

221.2

 

208.8

 

368.5

 

367.5

 

Total

 

$

1,102.4

 

$

1,079.4

 

$

1,971.3

 

$

2,065.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EARNINGS (LOSS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

$

66.5

 

$

(9.6

)

$

154.9

 

$

84.8

 

Direct Marketing

 

40.7

 

17.3

 

62.4

 

36.7

 

Corporate expenses

 

(15.4

)

(13.3

)

(29.0

)

(26.9

)

Other expenses (1)

 

(6.4

)

(9.0

)

(9.7

)

(9.5

)

Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments

 

(18.3

)

(18.0

)

(36.6

)

(36.1

)

Impairment charges (2)

 

 

(560.1

)

 

(560.1

)

Total

 

$

67.1

 

$

(592.7

)

$

142.0

 

$

(511.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING PROFIT (LOSS) MARGIN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

7.5

%

(1.1

)%

9.7

%

5.0

%

Direct Marketing

 

18.4

%

8.3

%

16.9

%

10.0

%

Total

 

6.1

%

(54.9

)%

7.2

%

(24.8

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHANGE IN COMPARABLE REVENUES (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

(0.6

)%

(25.0

)%

(7.6

)%

(20.8

)%

Direct Marketing

 

5.9

%

(12.1

)%

0.3

%

(10.0

)%

Total

 

0.6

%

(22.8

)%

(6.2

)%

(19.0

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SALES PER SQUARE FOOT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

$

137

 

$

139

 

$

249

 

$

271

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STORE COUNT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman stores:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Open at beginning of period

 

43

 

42

 

42

 

41

 

Opened during the period

 

 

 

1

 

1

 

Open at end of period

 

43

 

42

 

43

 

42

 

Clearance centers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Open at beginning of period

 

28

 

25

 

27

 

24

 

Opened during the period

 

 

 

1

 

1

 

Open at end of period

 

28

 

25

 

28

 

25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL DATA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EBITDA (4)

 

$

119.9

 

$

(535.5

)

$

248.8

 

$

(397.3

)

Adjusted EBITDA (4)

 

$

119.9

 

$

24.6

 

$

248.8

 

$

162.8

 

 


(1)        Other expenses consists primarily of costs (primarily professional fees and severance) incurred in connection with cost reductions and corporate initiatives.

 

(2)        Impairment charges recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 consist of pretax charges of 1) $291.1 million for the writedown to fair value of goodwill, 2) $242.2 million for the writedown to fair value of the net carrying value of tradenames and 3) $26.8 million for the writedown to fair value of the net carrying value of certain long-lived assets.

 

(3)        Comparable revenues include 1) revenues derived from our retail stores open for more than fifty two weeks, including stores that have been relocated or expanded and 2) revenues from our Direct Marketing operation.

 

(4)        For an explanation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as a measure of our operating performance, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measure-EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA.”

 

31



Table of Contents

 

Fiscal Year 2010 Summary

 

While economic conditions and consumer spending improved slightly in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the prior year, consumer spending remains below historical levels.  We do not anticipate the return of consumer spending to historical levels in the near-term.

 

A summary of our operating results is as follows:

 

·                  Revenues—Our revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 were impacted by a slightly higher level of customer demand resulting in favorable comparable revenues.  As a result, our revenues for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 were $1,102.4 million, an increase of 2.1% as compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 reflecting an increase in comparable revenues of 0.6%.

 

Our revenues for year-to-date fiscal 2010 were $1,971.3 million, a decrease of 4.5% as compared to the prior year reflecting a decline in comparable revenues of 6.2%.

 

For Specialty Retail stores, our sales per square foot for the last twelve trailing months were $453 as of January 30, 2010, $454 as of October 31, 2009 and $553 as of January 31, 2009.

 

·                  Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation)—COGS represented 69.1% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, an improvement of 7.0% of revenues from the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  COGS represented 65.7% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2010, an improvement of 4.0% of revenues compared to year-to-date fiscal 2009.  This decrease in COGS as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to lower net markdowns as a result of a closer alignment of on-hand inventories to customer demand in fiscal year 2010.

 

·                  Inventories—During the first and second quarter of fiscal year 2010, we continued to maintain tight control over inventory and aligned our inventory purchases with sales expectations for the Fall season.  At January 30, 2010, on-hand inventories totaled $732.3 million, a 12.9% decrease from the prior year fiscal period.  Excluding inventories held by new stores, inventories decreased by 16.8%.

 

·                  Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation)— SG&A represented 21.6% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, a net improvement of 1.0% of revenues compared to the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  SG&A represented 23.2% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2010, a net improvement of 0.4% of revenues compared to year-to-date fiscal 2009.  The lower levels of SG&A expenses primarily reflect 1) savings realized as a result of our on-going initiatives to control our expenses, 2) lower advertising and promotions costs incurred, offset by 3) higher incentive compensation requirements.

 

·                  Operating earnings (loss)—Total operating earnings in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 were $67.1 million, or 6.1% of revenues.  Total operating losses in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 were $592.7 million, or 54.9% of revenues, which included impairments of our long-lived assets of $560.1 million, or 51.9% of revenues.  Excluding the impairments of our long-lived assets in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, operating margins increased by 9.1% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 primarily due to:

 

·                  a decrease in COGS by 7.0% of revenues primarily due to lower net markdowns;

 

·                  decreases in both SG&A expenses by 1.0% of revenues and depreciation and amortization expense by 0.5% of revenues; and

 

·                  an increase in income from our credit card operations by 0.6% of revenues primarily due to lower shared credit card losses.

 

Total operating earnings in year-to-date fiscal 2010 were $142.0 million, or 7.2% of revenues.  Total operating losses in year-to-date fiscal year 2009 were $511.1 million, or 24.8% of revenues, which included impairments of our long-lived assets of $560.1 million, or 27.1% of revenues.  Excluding the impairments in year-to-date fiscal 2009, operating margins increased by 4.9% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2010 primarily due to:

 

·                  a decrease in COGS by 4.0% of revenues primarily due to lower net markdowns;

 

32



Table of Contents

 

·                  a decrease in SG&A expenses by 0.4% of revenues primarily due to 1) savings realized as a result of our on-going initiatives to control our expenses, 2) lower advertising and promotions costs incurred, offset by 3) higher incentive compensation requirements; and

 

·                  an increase in income from our credit card operations by 0.4% of revenues primarily due to lower shared credit card losses.

 

·                  Liquidity—Cash provided by our operating activities was $232.4 million in year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to $49.8 million in year-to-date fiscal 2009.  This change was primarily due to the improvement in operating earnings and lower working capital requirements attributable to the closer alignment of on-hand inventories to customer demand in fiscal year 2010.  We held cash balances of $500.7 million at January 30, 2010 compared to $223.2 million at January 31, 2009.  At January 30, 2010, we had no borrowings outstanding under our Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, $31.1 million of outstanding letters of credit and $430.1 million of unused borrowing availability.

 

Given the dislocation in the financial markets and the uncertainty as to when reasonable conditions would return, we elected to pay PIK Interest for the three quarterly interest periods ending October 14, 2009 and to make such interest payments with the issuance of additional Senior Notes at the PIK Interest rate of 9.75% instead of paying interest in cash.  As a result, the original principal amount of Senior Notes of $700.0 million increased by $17.1 million on April 14, 2009, $17.4 million on July 14, 2009 and $17.9 million on October 14, 2009.

 

For the quarterly periods ending January 15, 2010 and April 15, 2010, we elected to pay cash interest.  Prior to the beginning of each eligible interest period in the future, we will evaluate whether to continue utilizing this PIK feature, taking into account market conditions and other relevant factors at that time. After October 15, 2010, we are required to make all interest payments on the Senior Notes entirely in cash.

 

·                  Outlook—We do not anticipate the return of consumer spending to historical levels in the near-term.  We plan to maintain an appropriate alignment of our inventory levels and purchases with anticipated lower customer demand. Despite the anticipated continuation of weakened economic conditions, we believe the cash generated from our operations along with our cash balances and available sources of financing will enable us to meet our cash obligations for the remainder of fiscal year 2010.

 

33



Table of Contents

 

Thirteen Weeks Ended January 30, 2010 Compared to Thirteen Weeks Ended January 31, 2009

 

Revenues.  Our revenues for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 of $1,102.4 million increased $23.0 million, or 2.1%, from $1,079.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The increase in revenues was due to increases in comparable revenues related to a slightly higher level of customer demand.

 

Comparable revenues for the thirteen weeks ended January 30, 2010 were $1,084.5 million compared to $1,077.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, representing an increase of 0.6%.  Comparable revenues decreased in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 by 0.6% for Specialty Retail stores and increased 5.9% for Direct Marketing.  New stores generated revenues of $17.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010.

 

Internet revenues generated by Direct Marketing were $189.3 million for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, an increase of 9.9% compared to the prior year fiscal period.  Catalog revenues decreased 12.9% compared to the prior year fiscal period as our customers continue to migrate toward on-line retailing in our Direct Marketing operation.

 

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation).  COGS for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 were 69.1% of revenues compared to 76.1% of revenues for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.

 

The decrease in COGS by 7.0% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was primarily due to:

 

·                  increased product margins generated by both our Specialty Retail stores and Direct Marketing operation of approximately 6.7% of revenues primarily due to lower net markdowns as a result of a closer alignment of on-hand inventories to customer demand in fiscal year 2010; and

 

·                  lower buying and occupancy costs of 0.3% of revenues primarily due to savings realized as a result of our on-going initiatives to control our expenses.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation).  SG&A expenses decreased by $6.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the prior year fiscal period.  SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 21.6% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to 22.6% of revenues in the prior year fiscal period.  The net decrease in SG&A expenses by 1.0% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was primarily due to:

 

·                  lower payroll costs, net of related benefits, of approximately 1.4% of revenues, primarily as a result of our reduced headcount;

 

·                  a lower level of advertising and promotions costs incurred in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 of approximately 0.2% of revenues, primarily due to a lower level of catalog spending by our Direct Marketing operation in connection with planned decreases in catalog circulation; offset by

 

·                  higher incentive compensation requirements by approximately 0.7% of revenues.

 

Income from credit card program, net.  We earned HSBC Program Income of $16.6 million, or 1.5% of revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $10.2 million, or 0.9% of revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 primarily due to lower shared credit card losses.

 

Depreciation expense.  Depreciation expense was $34.4 million, or 3.1% of revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $39.1 million, or 3.6% of revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  The decrease in depreciation expense results primarily from recent lower levels of capital spending and delays in certain real estate projects in response to current economic conditions.

 

Amortization expense.  Amortization of intangible assets (primarily customer lists and favorable lease commitments) aggregated $18.3 million, or 1.7% of revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $18.0 million, or 1.7% of revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.

 

Impairment charges.  In the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, we recorded impairment charges, related primarily to our tradenames and goodwill, aggregating $560.1 million in connection with the review of our long-lived assets for recoverability, as more fully explained in Note 2 in our notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

34



Table of Contents

 

Segment operating earnings (loss).  Segment operating earnings (loss) for our Specialty Retail stores and Direct Marketing segments do not reflect either the impact of adjustments to revalue our assets and liabilities to estimated fair value at the Acquisition date or impairment charges related to declines in fair value subsequent to the Acquisition date.  The reconciliation of segment operating earnings (loss) to total operating earnings (loss) is as follows:

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

(in millions)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

$

66.5

 

$

(9.6

)

Direct Marketing

 

40.7

 

17.3

 

Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments

 

(18.3

)

(18.0

)

Corporate expenses

 

(15.4

)

(13.3

)

Other expenses

 

(6.4

)

(9.0

)

Impairment charges

 

 

(560.1

)

Total operating earnings (loss)

 

$

67.1

 

$

(592.7

)

 

Operating earnings for our Specialty Retail stores segment were $66.5 million, or 7.5% of Specialty Retail stores revenues, for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to operating losses of $9.6 million, or 1.1% of Specialty Retail stores revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The increase in operating margin as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to:

 

·                  lower net markdowns;

 

·                  lower buying and occupancy expenses;

 

·                  favorable payroll, net of related benefits, primarily due to savings realized as a result of our initiatives to control our expenses; offset by

 

·                  higher incentive compensation requirements.

 

Operating earnings for Direct Marketing were $40.7 million, or 18.4% of Direct Marketing revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $17.3 million, or 8.3% of Direct Marketing revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The increase in operating margin as a percentage of revenues for Direct Marketing was primarily the result of:

 

·                  lower net markdowns;

 

·                  a lower level of spending for advertising and promotion costs; and

 

·                  favorable payroll and related costs primarily due to our initiatives to control expenses; offset by

 

·                  higher incentive compensation requirements.

 

35



Table of Contents

 

Interest expense, net.  Net interest expense was $59.0 million, or 5.4% of revenues, in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 and $58.6 million, or 5.4% of revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The significant components of interest expense are as follows:

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility

 

$

20,787

 

$

23,941

 

2028 Debentures

 

2,207

 

2,227

 

Senior Notes

 

16,744

 

15,711

 

Senior Subordinated Notes

 

12,969

 

13,122

 

Amortization of debt issue costs

 

4,679

 

3,554

 

Other

 

1,770

 

865

 

Total interest expense

 

59,156

 

59,420

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

152

 

666

 

Capitalized interest

 

 

173

 

Interest expense, net

 

$

59,004

 

$

58,581

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit).  Our effective income tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 was 51.2% compared to 21.8% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  No income tax benefit exists related to the $291.1 million of goodwill impairment charges recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  Excluding the impact of the goodwill impairment charges, our effective income tax rate was 39.4% for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  Increases in our effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the corresponding prior year fiscal period is primarily attributable to the relative significance of non-taxable income and non-deductible expenses to our estimated taxable loss in the current year.

 

The IRS is examining our federal tax return for fiscal year 2007.  We believe our recorded tax liabilities as of January 30, 2010 are sufficient to cover any potential assessments to be made by the IRS upon the completion of their examination. We will continue to monitor the progress of the IRS examination and review our recorded tax liabilities for potential audit assessments.  With respect to state and local jurisdictions, with limited exceptions, the Company and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax audits for fiscal years before 2005.  We believe it is reasonably possible that additional adjustments in the amounts of our unrecognized tax benefits could occur within the next twelve months as a result of settlements with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of limitation.  At this time, we do not believe such adjustments will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Twenty-Six Weeks Ended January 30, 2010 Compared to Twenty-Six Weeks Ended January 31, 2009

 

Revenues.  Our revenues for year-to-date fiscal 2010 of $1,971.3 million decreased $93.9 million, or 4.5%, from $2,065.2 million in year-to-date fiscal 2009.  The decrease in revenues was due primarily to decreases in comparable revenues in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.  New stores generated revenues of $36.7 million in year-to-date fiscal 2010.

 

Comparable revenues for the twenty-six weeks ended January 30, 2010 were $1,934.6 million compared to $2,062.4 million in year-to-date fiscal 2009, representing a decrease of 6.2%.  Changes in comparable revenues, by quarter and by reportable segment, were:

 

 

 

First
Quarter

 

Second
Quarter

 

Year-to-Date
Fiscal 2010

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

(14.9

)%

(0.6

)%

(7.6

)%

Direct Marketing

 

(7.2

)%

5.9

%

0.3

%

Total

 

(13.7

)%

0.6

%

(6.2

)%

 

Internet revenues generated by Direct Marketing were $308.2 million for year-to-date fiscal 2010, an increase of 5.1% compared to the prior year fiscal period.  Catalog revenues decreased 18.8% compared to the prior year fiscal period as our customers continue to migrate toward on-line retailing in our Direct Marketing operation.

 

36



Table of Contents

 

Cost of goods sold including buying and occupancy costs (excluding depreciation).  COGS for year-to-date fiscal 2010 were 65.7% of revenues compared to 69.7% of revenues for year-to-date fiscal 2009.

 

The decrease in COGS by 4.0% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2010 was primarily due to lower net markdowns in both our Specialty Retail stores and Direct Marketing operation as a result of a closer alignment of on-hand inventories to customer demand in fiscal year 2010.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses (excluding depreciation).  SG&A expenses decreased by $30.0 million in year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to the prior year fiscal period.  SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased to 23.2% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to 23.6% of revenues in the prior year fiscal period.  The net decrease in SG&A expenses by 0.4% of revenues in year-to-date fiscal 2010 was primarily due to:

 

·                  lower payroll costs, net of related benefits, of approximately 1.0% of revenues, primarily as a result of our reduced headcount;

 

·                  a lower level of advertising and promotions costs incurred in year-to-date fiscal 2010 of approximately 0.2% of revenues, primarily due to a lower level of catalog spending by our Direct Marketing operation in connection with planned decreases in catalog circulation; offset by

 

·                  higher incentive compensation requirements by approximately 0.7% of revenues.

 

Income from credit card program, net.  We earned HSBC Program Income of $29.7 million, or 1.5% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to $23.2 million, or 1.1% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2009 primarily due to lower shared credit card losses.

 

Depreciation expense.  Depreciation expense was $70.2 million, or 3.6% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to $77.7 million, or 3.8% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2009.  The decrease in depreciation expense as a percentage of revenues, results primarily from recent lower levels of capital spending and delays in certain real estate projects in response to current economic conditions.

 

Amortization expense.  Amortization of intangible assets (primarily customer lists and favorable lease commitments) aggregated $36.6 million, or 1.9% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to $36.1 million, or 1.7% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2009.

 

Impairment charges.  In the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, we recorded impairment charges, related primarily to our tradenames and goodwill, aggregating $560.1 million in connection with the review of our long-lived assets for recoverability, as more fully explained in Note 2 in our notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Segment operating earnings (loss).  Segment operating earnings (loss) for our Specialty Retail stores and Direct Marketing segments do not reflect either the impact of adjustments to revalue our assets and liabilities to estimated fair value at the Acquisition date or impairment charges related to declines in fair value subsequent to the Acquisition date.  The reconciliation of segment operating earnings (loss) to total operating earnings (loss) is as follows:

 

 

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in millions)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

Specialty Retail stores

 

$

154.9

 

$

84.8

 

Direct Marketing

 

62.4

 

36.7

 

Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments

 

(36.6

)

(36.1

)

Corporate expenses

 

(29.0

)

(26.9

)

Other expenses

 

(9.7

)

(9.5

)

Impairment charges

 

 

(560.1

)

Total operating earnings (loss)

 

$

142.0

 

$

(511.1

)

 

Operating earnings for our Specialty Retail stores segment were $154.9 million, or 9.7% of Specialty Retail stores revenues, for year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to $84.8 million, or 5.0% of Specialty Retail stores revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The increase in operating margin as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to:

 

·                  lower net markdowns;

 

37



Table of Contents

 

·                  favorable payroll, net of related benefits, primarily due to savings realized as a result of our initiatives to control our expenses; offset by

 

·                  higher incentive compensation requirements.

 

Operating earnings for Direct Marketing were $62.4 million, or 16.9% of Direct Marketing revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to $36.7 million, or 10.0% of Direct Marketing revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The increase in operating margin as a percentage of revenues for Direct Marketing was primarily the result of:

 

·                  lower net markdowns;

 

·                  a lower level of spending for advertising and promotion costs; and

 

·                  favorable payroll and related costs primarily due to our initiatives to control expenses; offset by

 

·                  higher incentive compensation requirements.

 

Interest expense, net.  Net interest expense was $118.4 million, or 6.0% of revenues, in year-to-date fiscal 2010 and $116.4 million, or 5.6% of revenues, for the prior year fiscal period.  The significant components of interest expense are as follows:

 

 

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(in thousands)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility

 

$

41,573

 

$

47,871

 

2028 Debentures

 

4,433

 

4,453

 

Senior Notes

 

34,269

 

31,461

 

Senior Subordinated Notes

 

25,795

 

26,091

 

Amortization of debt issue costs

 

9,340

 

7,109

 

Other

 

3,480

 

1,691

 

Total interest expense

 

118,890

 

118,676

 

Less:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

328

 

1,771

 

Capitalized interest

 

193

 

479

 

Interest expense, net

 

$

118,369

 

$

116,426

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit).  Our effective income tax rate for year-to-date fiscal 2010 was 47.1% compared to 20.9% for year-to-date fiscal 2009.  No income tax benefit exists related to the $291.1 million of goodwill impairment charges recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009.  Excluding the impact of the goodwill impairment charges, our effective income tax rate was 39.0% for year-to-date fiscal 2009.  Increases in our effective tax rate for year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to the corresponding period in fiscal year 2009 is primarily attributable to the relative significance of non-taxable income and non-deductible expenses to our estimated taxable loss in the current year.

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measure — EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

 

We present the non-GAAP financial performance measures of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because we use these measures to monitor and evaluate the performance of our business and believe the presentation of these measures will enhance investors’ ability to analyze trends in our business, evaluate our performance relative to other companies in our industry and evaluate our ability to service our debt.  In addition, we use performance targets based on Adjusted EBITDA as a component of the measurement of incentive compensation as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not presentations made in accordance with GAAP and our computation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may vary from others in our industry.  In addition, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA contain some, but not all, adjustments that are taken into account in the calculation of the components of various covenants in the agreements and indentures governing NMG’s senior secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, Senior

 

38



Table of Contents

 

Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes.  EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as alternatives to operating earnings (loss) or net earnings (loss) as measures of operating performance.  In addition, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not presented as and should not be considered as alternatives to cash flows as measures of liquidity.  EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have important limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP.  For example, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

 

·                  do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

 

·                  do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

 

·                  do not reflect our considerable interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt;

 

·                  exclude tax payments that represent a reduction in available cash; and

 

·                  do not reflect any cash requirements for assets being depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the future.

 

The following table reconciles net earnings (loss) as reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations prepared in accordance with GAAP to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA:

 

 

 

Thirteen weeks ended

 

Twenty-Six weeks ended

 

(dollars in millions)

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

January 30,
2010

 

January 31,
2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net earnings (loss)

 

$

4.0

 

$

(509.2

)(1)

$

12.5

 

$

(496.3

)(1)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

4.2

 

(142.0

)

11.1

 

(131.2

)

Interest expense, net

 

59.0

 

58.6

 

118.4

 

116.4

 

Depreciation expense

 

34.4

 

39.1

 

70.2

 

77.7

 

Amortization of intangible assets and favorable lease commitments

 

18.3

 

18.0

 

36.6

 

36.1

 

EBITDA

 

$

119.9

 

$

(535.5

)(1)

$

248.8

 

$

(397.3

)(1)

EBITDA as a percentage of revenues

 

10.9

%

(49.6

)%

12.6

%

(19.2

)%

Non-cash impairment of long-lived assets

 

 

560.1

 

 

560.1

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

119.9

 

$

24.6

 

$

248.8

 

$

162.8

 

Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenues

 

10.9

%

2.3

%

12.6

%

7.9

%

 


(1)          For quarter-to-date and year-to-date fiscal 2009, operating loss and EBITDA include pretax impairment charges related to 1) $291.1 million for the writedown to fair value of goodwill, 2) $242.2 million for the writedown to fair value of the net carrying value of tradenames and 3) $26.8 million for the writedown to fair value of the net carrying value of certain long-lived assets.

 

Inflation and Deflation and Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

 

We believe changes in revenues and net earnings that have resulted from inflation or deflation have not been material during the periods presented. In recent years, we have experienced certain inflationary conditions related to 1) increases in product costs primarily due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates that have reduced the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar and 2) increases in SG&A. We purchase a substantial portion of our inventory from foreign suppliers whose costs are affected by the fluctuation of their local currency against the dollar or who price their merchandise in currencies other than the dollar. Fluctuations in the Euro-U.S. dollar exchange rate affect us most significantly; however, we source goods from numerous countries and thus are affected by changes in numerous currencies and, generally, by fluctuations in the U.S. dollar relative to such currencies. Accordingly, changes in the value of the dollar relative to foreign currencies may increase the retail prices of goods offered for sale and/or increase our cost of goods sold. If our customers reduce their levels of spending in response to increases in retail prices and/or we are unable to pass such cost increases to our customers, our revenues, gross margins, and ultimately our earnings, could decrease. Foreign currency fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations in the future. We attempt to offset the effects of inflation through price increases and

 

39



Table of Contents

 

control of expenses, although our ability to increase prices may be limited by customer resistance and competitive factors. We attempt to offset the effects of merchandise deflation, which has occurred on a limited basis in recent years, through control of expenses. There is no assurance, however, that inflation or deflation will not materially affect our operations in the future.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Our cash requirements consist principally of:

 

·                  the funding of our merchandise purchases;

 

·                  capital expenditures for new store construction, store renovations and upgrades of our management information systems;

 

·                  debt service requirements;

 

·                  income tax payments; and

 

·                  obligations related to our Pension Plan.

 

Our primary sources of short-term liquidity are comprised of cash on hand, availability under our Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and vendor financing. The amounts of cash on hand and borrowings under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility are influenced by a number of factors, including revenues, working capital levels, vendor terms, the level of capital expenditures, cash requirements related to financing instruments and debt service obligations, Pension Plan funding obligations and tax payment obligations, among others.  As to vendor financing, some of our vendors have experienced serious cash flow issues, reductions in available credit from banks, factors or other financial institutions, or increases in the cost of capital as a result of current economic conditions.  To counteract their cash flow problems, our vendors may attempt to increase their prices, pass through increased costs, alter historical credit and payment terms available to us or seek other relief.  Any of these actions could have an adverse impact on our relationship with the vendor or constrain the amounts or timing of our purchases from the vendor and, ultimately, have an adverse impact on our revenues, profitability and liquidity.

 

Our working capital requirements fluctuate during the fiscal year, increasing substantially during the first and second quarters of each fiscal year as a result of higher seasonal levels of inventories.  We have typically financed the increases in working capital needs during the first and second fiscal quarters with available cash balances, cash flows from operations and, if necessary, with cash provided from borrowings under our credit facilities.  We have made no borrowings under our Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility during the year-to-date fiscal periods of either 2010 or 2009.

 

We believe that operating cash flows, cash balances, available vendor financing and amounts available pursuant to our senior secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, will be sufficient to fund our operations, anticipated capital expenditure requirements, debt service obligations, contractual obligations and commitments and Pension Plan funding requirements through the remainder of fiscal year 2010.

 

At January 30, 2010, cash and cash equivalents were $500.7 million compared to $223.2 million at January 31, 2009. Net cash provided by our operating activities was $232.4 million in year-to-date fiscal 2010 compared to $49.8 million in year-to-date fiscal 2009.  This change was primarily due to the improvement in operating earnings and lower working capital requirements attributable to the closer alignment of on-hand inventories to customer demand in fiscal year 2010.

 

Net cash used for investing activities, representing capital expenditures, was $28.4 million in year-to-date fiscal 2010 and $64.5 million in year-to-date fiscal 2009.  We incurred capital expenditures in year-to-date fiscal 2010 related to the construction of our new store in Bellevue (suburban Seattle).  We incurred significant capital expenditures in year-to-date fiscal 2009 related to the construction of new stores in Topanga (the greater Los Angeles area) and Bellevue. We opened our Topanga store in September 2008 and our Bellevue store in September 2009.  In response to current economic conditions and delays in certain real estate projects, we have reduced our current and near-term construction commitments and currently project gross capital expenditures for fiscal year 2010 to be approximately $70 to $80 million.  Net of developer contributions, capital expenditures for fiscal year 2010 are projected to be approximately $55 to $65 million.

 

Net cash used for financing activities was $26.8 million in year-to-date fiscal 2010 as compared to $1.2 million in year-to-date fiscal 2009.  In the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, pursuant to the terms of our Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, we prepaid $26.6 million of outstanding borrowings under that facility from excess cash flow that we generated in fiscal year 2009.

 

40



Table of Contents

 

Financing Structure at January 30, 2010

 

Our major sources of funds are comprised of vendor financing, a $600.0 million Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, $1,598.4 million Senior Secured Term Loan Facility, $752.4 million Senior Notes, $500.0 million Senior Subordinated Notes, $125.0 million 2028 Debentures and operating leases.

 

Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  On July 15, 2009, NMG amended and restated the terms of its existing asset-based revolving credit facility (which had been scheduled to mature on October 6, 2010).  The terms of the amended and restated Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility include a scheduled maturity date of January 15, 2013 and a maximum committed borrowing capacity of $600.0 million (the same amount as in the prior facility).  The new facility also provides an uncommitted accordion feature that allows NMG to request the lenders to provide additional capacity in either the form of increased revolving commitments or incremental term loans, subject to a potential total maximum facility of $800 million.

 

The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility provides committed financing of up to $600.0 million, subject to a borrowing base.  The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility includes borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and for borrowings on same-day notice.  The borrowing base for the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility is equal to at any time the sum of (a) the lesser of (i) 80% of eligible inventory (valued at the lower of cost or market value) and (ii) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, and (b) 85% of the amounts owed by credit card processors in respect of eligible credit card accounts constituting proceeds arising from the sale or disposition of inventory, less certain reserves.   Through April 30, 2011 NMG is required to maintain excess availability under the terms of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility of at least the greater of (a) 10% of the lesser of (i) the aggregate revolving commitments and (ii) the borrowing base and (b) $50 million.  After April 30, 2011, if at any time, excess availability is less than the greater of (a) 15% of the lesser of (i) the aggregate revolving commitments and (ii) the borrowing base and (b) $60 million, NMG will be required to maintain a pro forma ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated Fixed Charges (as such terms are defined in the credit agreement) of at least 1.1 to 1.0.  On January 30, 2010, NMG had no borrowings outstanding under this facility, $31.1 million of outstanding letters of credit and $430.1 million of unused borrowing availability.

 

See Note 3 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009 for a further description of the terms of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.

 

Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  In October 2005, NMG entered into a credit agreement and related security and other agreements for a $1,975.0 million Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  At January 30, 2010, the outstanding balance under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was $1,598.4 million.  The principal amount of the loans outstanding is due and payable in full on April 6, 2013.

 

At January 30, 2010, borrowings under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility bore interest at a rate per annum equal to, at NMG’s option, either (a) a base rate determined by reference to the higher of (1) the prime rate of Credit Suisse and (2) the federal funds effective rate plus 1¤2 of 1% or (b) a LIBOR rate, subject to certain adjustments, in each case plus an applicable margin. The interest rate on the outstanding borrowings pursuant to the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility was 2.26% at January 30, 2010.  The applicable margin is subject to adjustment based on contractually defined debt coverage ratios.  At January 30, 2010, the applicable margin with respect to base rate borrowings was 1.00% and the applicable margin with respect to LIBOR borrowings was 2.00%.

 

See Note 3 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009 for a further description of the terms of the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.

 

2028 Debentures.  In May 1998, NMG issued $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 7.125% 2028 Debentures.  NMG’s 2028 Debentures mature on June 1, 2028.

 

See Note 3 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009 for a further description of the terms of the 2028 Debentures.

 

Senior Notes.  NMG has $752.4 million aggregate principal amount of 9.0% / 9.75% Senior Notes under a senior indenture (Senior Indenture).  NMG’s Senior Notes mature on October 15, 2015.  We negotiated for the right to include the PIK feature in our Senior Notes because of our belief that this feature could be a useful tool to enhance liquidity under appropriate circumstances. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, given the dislocation in the financial markets and the uncertainty as to when reasonable conditions would return, we believed that it was appropriate to utilize this feature, even though we had unused borrowing capacity under our $600.0 million revolving credit facility. Accordingly, we elected to pay PIK Interest for

 

41



Table of Contents

 

the three quarterly interest periods ending on October 14, 2009 and to make such interest payments with the issuance of additional Senior Notes at the PIK Interest rate of 9.75% instead of paying interest in cash.  As a result, the original principal amount of Senior Notes of $700.0 million increased by $17.1 million on April 14, 2009, $17.4 million on July 14, 2009 and $17.9 million on October 14, 2009.

 

For the quarterly periods ending on January 15, 2010 and April 15, 2010, we elected to pay cash interest.  Prior to the beginning of each eligible interest period in the future, we will evaluate whether to continue utilizing this PIK feature, taking into account market conditions and other relevant factors at that time. After October 15, 2010, we are required to make all interest payments on the Senior Notes entirely in cash.

 

See Note 3 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009 for a further description of the terms of the Senior Notes.

 

Senior Subordinated Notes.  NMG has $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10.375% Senior Subordinated Notes under a senior subordinated indenture (Senior Subordinated Indenture).  NMG’s Senior Subordinated Notes mature on October 15, 2015.

 

See Note 3 of our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009 for a further description of the terms of the Senior Subordinated Notes.

 

Interest Rate Swaps.  In connection with the Acquisition, we obtained $2,575.0 million of floating rate debt agreements, of which $2,125.0 million was outstanding at the Acquisition date and $1,598.4 million is outstanding at January 30, 2010.  Effective December 6, 2005, NMG entered into floating to fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $1,000.0 million to limit our exposure to interest rate increases related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness.  These swap agreements hedge a portion of our contractual floating rate interest commitments through the expiration of the agreements in December 2010.  As a result of the swap agreements, NMG’s effective fixed interest rates as to the $1,000.0 million in floating rate indebtedness will currently range from 6.882% to 6.983% per quarter through 2010 and result in an average fixed rate of 6.930%.

 

Interest Rate Caps.  In addition to interest rate swap agreements, we also use interest rate cap agreements to manage our floating rate debt.  Effective January 19, 2010, NMG entered into interest rate cap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $500.0 million in order to hedge the variability of our cash flows related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness once the interest rate swap expires on December 6, 2010.  The interest rate cap agreements commence on December 6, 2010 and expire on December 6, 2012.  Pursuant to the interest rate cap agreements, NMG has capped LIBOR at 2.50% through December 6, 2012 with respect to the $500.0 million notional amount of such agreements.  In the event LIBOR is less than 2.5%, NMG will pay interest at the lower LIBOR rate.  In the event LIBOR is higher than 2.5%, NMG will pay interest at the capped rate of 2.5%.

 

OTHER MATTERS

 

Factors That May Affect Future Results

 

Matters discussed in MD&A include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “project” or “continue.” We make these forward-looking statements based on our expectations and beliefs concerning future events, as well as currently available data.  While we believe there is a reasonable basis for our forward-looking statements, they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Therefore, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and you should not place undue reliance on them. A variety of factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the anticipated or expected results expressed in our forward-looking statements. Factors that could affect future performance include, but are not limited, to:

 

Political and General Economic Conditions

 

·                  prolonged weakness in domestic and global capital markets and other economic conditions and the impact of such conditions on our ability to obtain credit;

 

42



Table of Contents

 

·                  current political and general economic conditions or changes in such conditions including relationships between the United States and the countries from which we source our merchandise;

 

·                  terrorist activities in the United States and elsewhere;

 

·                  political, social, economic, or other events resulting in the short- or long-term disruption in business at our stores, distribution centers or offices;

 

Customer Considerations

 

·                  changes in consumer confidence resulting in a reduction of discretionary spending on goods;

 

·                  changes in the demographic or retail environment;

 

·                  changes in consumer preferences or fashion trends;

 

·                  changes in our relationships with customers due to, among other things, 1) our failure to provide quality service and competitive loyalty programs, 2) our inability to provide credit pursuant to our proprietary credit card arrangement or 3) our failure to protect customer data or comply with regulations surrounding information security and privacy;

 

Merchandise Procurement and Supply Chain Considerations

 

·                  changes in our relationships with designers, vendors and other sources of merchandise, including adverse changes in their financial viability, cash flows or available sources of funds;

 

·                  delays in receipt of merchandise ordered due to work stoppages or other causes of delay in connection with either the manufacture or shipment of such merchandise;

 

·                  changes in foreign currency exchange or inflation rates;

 

·                  significant increases in paper, printing and postage costs;

 

Industry and Competitive Factors

 

·                  competitive responses to our loyalty programs, marketing, merchandising and promotional efforts or inventory liquidations by vendors or other retailers;

 

·                  adverse changes in the financial viability of our competitors;

 

·                  seasonality of the retail business;

 

·                  adverse weather conditions or natural disasters, particularly during peak selling seasons;

 

·                  delays in anticipated store openings and renovations;

 

·                  our success in enforcing our intellectual property rights;

 

Employee Considerations

 

·                  changes in key management personnel and our ability to retain key management personnel;

 

·                  changes in our relationships with certain of our key sales associates and our ability to retain our key sales associates;

 

Legal and Regulatory Issues

 

·                  changes in government or regulatory requirements increasing our costs of operations;

 

·                  litigation that may have an adverse effect on our financial results or reputation;

 

43



Table of Contents

 

Leverage Considerations

 

·                  the effects of incurring a substantial amount of indebtedness under our senior secured credit facilities and our senior notes and senior subordinated notes;

 

·                  the ability to refinance our indebtedness under our senior secured credit facilities and the effects of any refinancing;

 

·                  the effects upon us of complying with the covenants contained in our senior secured credit facilities and the indentures governing our senior notes and senior subordinated notes;

 

·                  restrictions the terms and conditions of the indebtedness under our senior secured credit facilities may place on our ability to respond to changes in our business or to take certain actions;

 

Other Factors

 

·                  impact of funding requirements related to our noncontributory defined benefit pension plan;

 

·                  changes in our proprietary credit card arrangement which may occur upon expiration of our current Program Agreement with HSBC in July 2010 and the execution of a replacement agreement;

 

·                  the design and implementation of new information systems as well as enhancements of existing systems; and

 

·                  other risks, uncertainties and factors set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including those set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

 

The foregoing factors are not exhaustive, and new factors may emerge or changes to the foregoing factors may occur that could impact our business. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise (publicly or otherwise) any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, new information or future circumstances.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future events.  These estimates and assumptions affect amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of gain and loss contingencies at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  Our current estimates are subject to change if different assumptions as to the outcome of future events were made.  We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis and predicate those estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances.  We make adjustments to our assumptions and judgments when facts and circumstances dictate.  Since future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, actual results may differ from the estimates we used in preparing the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

See Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 for a summary of our critical accounting policies.  A complete description of our critical accounting policies is included in our Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.  In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance that addresses the recognition and accounting for identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed and non-controlling interests in business combinations.  In addition, this guidance changes the accounting treatment for certain acquisition-related items, including requirements to expense acquisition-related costs as incurred, expense restructuring costs associated with an acquired business and recognize post-acquisition changes in tax uncertainties associated with a business combination as a component of tax expense.  These rules are to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after December 15, 2008.  Generally, the effect of this guidance will depend on future acquisitions.  However, the accounting for the resolution of any tax uncertainties remaining as of January 30, 2010 related to the Acquisition will be subject to the provisions of this guidance.  As to the future resolution of these tax uncertainties, we do not believe these requirements will have a material impact on our future financial statements.

 

In February 2008, the FASB issued guidance that delays the effective date of fair value disclosures required for all nonfinancial assets, such as intangible assets and goodwill, and nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair

 

44



Table of Contents

 

value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis.  We implemented this guidance in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended October 31, 2009, however, no additional disclosures were required.

 

In December 2008, the FASB issued guidance related to an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan.  This guidance is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, or our fiscal year ending July 31, 2010.  We have not yet evaluated the impact of adopting the disclosure requirements on our consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ending July 31, 2010.

 

In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance requiring additional disclosures in interim financial statements regarding determining and reporting fair values for certain assets and liabilities.  We adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 related to the fair value of our debt instruments.

 

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that establishes the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.  This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, or our first quarter of fiscal year 2010 ending October 31, 2009.  The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

The market risk inherent in the Company’s financial instruments represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The Company seeks to manage exposure to adverse interest rate changes through its normal operating and financing activities. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk through its borrowing activities, which are described in Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

In connection with the Acquisition, NMG obtained $2,575.0 million of floating rate debt agreements, of which $2,125.0 million was outstanding at the Acquisition date and $1,598.4 million is outstanding under its Senior Secured Term Loan Facility at January 30, 2010.  In addition, as of January 30, 2010, NMG had no borrowings outstanding under its Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility.  Future borrowings under NMG’s Asset-Based Revolving Facility, to the extent of outstanding borrowings, would be affected by interest rate changes.

 

Effective December 6, 2005, NMG entered into floating to fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $1,000.0 million to limit our exposure to interest rate increases related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness.  These swap agreements hedge a portion of our contractual floating rate interest commitments through the expiration of the agreements in December 2010.  As a result of the swap agreements, NMG’s effective fixed interest rates as to the $1,000.0 million in floating rate indebtedness will currently range from 6.882% to 6.983% per quarter through 2010 and result in an average fixed rate of 6.930%.  A 1% increase in the rates relating to the portion of our floating rate date that is not hedged would increase annual interest expense by approximately $6.0 million.

 

In addition to interest rate swap agreements, we also use interest rate cap agreements to manage our floating rate debt.  Effective January 19, 2010, NMG entered into interest rate cap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $500.0 million in order to hedge the variability of our cash flows related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness once the interest rate swap expires on December 6, 2010.  The interest rate cap agreements commence on December 6, 2010 and expire on December 6, 2012.  Pursuant to the interest rate cap agreements, NMG has capped LIBOR at 2.50% through December 6, 2012 with respect to the $500.0 million notional amount of such agreements.  In the event LIBOR is less than 2.5%, NMG will pay interest at the lower LIBOR rate.  In the event LIBOR is higher than 2.5%, NMG will pay interest at the capped rate of 2.5%.

 

The effects of changes in the U.S. equity and bond markets serve to increase or decrease the value of pension plan assets, resulting in increased or decreased cash funding by the Company. The Company seeks to manage exposure to adverse equity and bond returns by maintaining diversified investment portfolios and utilizing professional investment managers.

 

45



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

a. Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

 

In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation as of January 30, 2010, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as other key members of our management, of the design and operating effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, accumulated, processed, summarized, reported and communicated on a timely basis within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

 

b. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

 

In the ordinary course of business, we routinely enhance our information systems by either upgrading our current systems or implementing new systems. No change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended January 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

 

PART II

 

ITEM 1.                                  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We are currently involved in various legal actions and proceedings that arose in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that any liability arising as a result of these actions and proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 is incorporated herein by reference as if fully restated herein.  Note 10 contains forward-looking statements that are subject to the risks and uncertainties discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Factors That May Affect Future Results.”

 

ITEM 1A.                         RISK FACTORS

 

Risks Related to Current Economic Conditions

 

Current economic conditions have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, our business and results of operations.

 

The recent deterioration in economic conditions, both in the domestic and global economies, has had a significant adverse impact on our business.  Instability in the financial markets, tightening of consumer credit and other economic conditions and uncertainties have caused a reduction in consumer spending.  These conditions have had a significant negative impact on our revenues.

 

The merchandise we sell consists in large part of luxury retail goods. The purchase of these goods by customers is discretionary, and therefore highly dependent upon the level of consumer spending, particularly among affluent customers. Accordingly, sales of these products may continue to be adversely affected by a continuation or worsening of current economic conditions, increases in consumer debt levels, uncertainties regarding future economic prospects or a decline in consumer confidence. During an actual or perceived economic downturn (as a result of increases in consumer debt levels, increases in interest rates, a tightening of consumer credit, uncertainties regarding future economic performance and tax rates and policies, or a decline in consumer confidence, among other factors), fewer customers may shop our stores and websites and those who do shop may limit the amounts of their purchases.  As a result, we could be required to take significant additional markdowns and/or increase our marketing and promotional expenses in response to the lower than anticipated levels of demand for luxury goods.  In addition,

 

46



Table of Contents

 

promotional and/or prolonged periods of deep discount pricing by our competitors could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We continue to experience a challenging economic and retail environment and expect these conditions will continue for an extended period of time.  We will continue to align our inventory levels and purchases with anticipated lower customer demand.  The prolonged continuation of current market conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Current economic conditions may constrain our ability to obtain credit.

 

Current economic conditions may constrain our ability to obtain credit.  Domestic and global credit and equity markets have recently undergone significant disruption, making it difficult for many businesses to obtain financing on acceptable terms or at all. As a result of this disruption, we have experienced an increase in the cost of borrowings necessary to operate our business.  If these conditions continue or become worse, our cost of borrowing could continue to increase.  It may also become more difficult to obtain financing for our operations or to refinance long-term obligations as they become payable.  In addition, our borrowing costs can be affected by independent rating agencies’ short and long-term debt ratings which are based largely on our performance as measured by credit metrics including interest coverage and leverage ratios.  A decrease in these ratings would likely also increase our cost of borrowing and make it more difficult for us to obtain financing.  Based on current economic conditions and our recent operating performance, our long-term debt ratings were downgraded in fiscal year 2009 by all three independent rating agencies.  A significant increase in the costs we incur in order to finance our operations may have a material adverse impact on our business results and financial condition.

 

Risks Related to Our Structure and NMG’s Indebtedness

 

Because our ownership of NMG accounts for substantially all of our assets and operations, we are subject to all risks applicable to NMG.

 

We are a holding company.  NMG and its subsidiaries conduct substantially all of our consolidated operations and own substantially all of our consolidated assets.  As a result, we are subject to all risks applicable to NMG.  In addition, NMG’s Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, NMG’s Senior Secured Term Loan Facility and the indentures governing NMG’s senior notes and senior subordinated notes contain provisions limiting NMG’s ability to distribute earnings to us, in the form of dividends or otherwise.

 

NMG has a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may adversely affect NMG’s cash flow and its ability to operate the business, to comply with debt covenants and make payments on its indebtedness.

 

We are highly leveraged.  As of January 30, 2010, the principal amount of NMG’s total indebtedness was approximately $2,976.2 million, the unused borrowing availability under the $600.0 million Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility was $430.1 million and the outstanding letters of credit were $31.1 million.  NMG’s substantial indebtedness, combined with its lease and other financial obligations and contractual commitments, could have other important consequences. For example, it could:

 

·                  make it more difficult for NMG to satisfy its obligations with respect to its indebtedness and any failure to comply with the obligations of any of its debt instruments, including restrictive covenants and borrowing conditions, could result in an event of default under the agreements governing NMG’s indebtedness;

 

·                  make NMG more vulnerable to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation;

 

·                  require NMG to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of cash flows to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;

 

·                  limit NMG’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in NMG’s business and the industry in which it operates;

 

·                  place NMG at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that are less highly leveraged;

 

·                  limit NMG’s ability to obtain credit from our vendors and/or the vendors’ factors; and

 

47



Table of Contents

 

·                  limit NMG’s ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of its business strategy or other purposes.

 

Any of the above listed factors could materially adversely affect NMG’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

In addition, NMG’s interest expense could increase if interest rates increase because the entire amount of the indebtedness under the senior secured credit facilities bears interest at floating rates.  As of January 30, 2010, NMG had approximately $1,598.4 million principal amount of floating rate debt, consisting of outstanding borrowings under the Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  In addition, NMG has an Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility that provides committed financing of up to $600.0 million, subject to a borrowing base.  As of January 30, 2010, NMG had no borrowings outstanding under this facility, $31.1 million of outstanding letters of credit and $430.1 million of unused borrowing availability.  Effective December 6, 2005, NMG entered into floating to fixed interest rate swap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $1,000.0 million to limit our exposure to interest rate increases related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness.

 

In addition to interest rate swap agreements, we also use interest rate cap agreements to manage our floating rate debt.  Effective January 19, 2010, NMG entered into interest rate cap agreements for an aggregate notional amount of $500.0 million in order to hedge the variability of our cash flows related to a portion of our floating rate indebtedness once the interest rate swap expires on December 6, 2010.  The interest rate cap agreements commence on December 6, 2010 and expire on December 6, 2012.  Pursuant to the interest rate cap agreements, NMG has capped LIBOR at 2.50% through December 6, 2012 with respect to the $500.0 million notional amount of such agreements.  In the event LIBOR is less than 2.5%, NMG will pay interest at the lower LIBOR rate.  In the event LIBOR is higher than 2.5%, NMG will pay interest at the capped rate of 2.5%.

 

To service NMG’s indebtedness, it will require a significant amount of cash. NMG’s ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond its control, and any failure to meet its debt service obligations could harm its business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

NMG’s ability to pay interest on and principal of the debt obligations will primarily depend upon NMG’s future operating performance. As a result, prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, will affect its ability to make these payments.

 

If NMG does not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy the debt service obligations, NMG may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring its indebtedness, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional capital.  Our ability to restructure or refinance NMG’s debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time.  Any refinancing of NMG’s debt could be at higher interest rates and may require it to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict its business operations.  The terms of existing or future debt instruments may restrict NMG from adopting some of these alternatives.  In addition, our borrowing costs and ability to refinance may be affected by short-term and long-term debt ratings assigned by independent rating agencies, which are based, in significant part, on NMG’s performance as measured by indicators such as interest coverage and leverage ratios.  Furthermore, any failure to make payments of interest and principal on NMG’s outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in a reduction of NMG’s credit rating, which could harm its ability to incur additional indebtedness on acceptable terms.

 

Contractual limitations on NMG’s ability to execute any necessary alternative financing plans could exacerbate the effects of any failure to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt service obligations.  The Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility permits NMG to borrow up to $600.0 million; however, NMG’s ability to borrow and obtain letters of credit (including amendments, renewals and extensions of letters of credit) thereunder is limited by a borrowing base, which at any time will equal the sum of (a) the lesser of (i) 80% of eligible inventory (valued at the lower of cost or market value) and (ii) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, and (b) 85% of the amounts owed by credit card processors to the borrowers under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility in respect of eligible credit card accounts constituting proceeds arising from the sale or disposition of inventory, less certain reserves.  In addition, if at any time the aggregate amount of outstanding revolving loans and incremental term loans, unreimbursed letter of credit drawings and undrawn letters of credit under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility exceeds the reported value of inventory as calculated under that facility, NMG will be required to eliminate such excess.  Further, if (a) the amount available under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility is less than the greater of (i) 20% of the lesser of (A) the aggregate revolving commitments and (B) the borrowing base and (ii) $75 million or (b) an event of default has occurred, NMG will be required to repay outstanding loans and cash collateralize letters of credit.  In addition, under the terms of the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility, through April 30, 2011 NMG is required to maintain excess availability of at least the greater of (a) 10% of the lesser of (i) the aggregate revolving commitments and (ii) the borrowing base and (b) $50 million.  After April 30, 2011, if at any time, excess availability is less than the greater of

 

48



Table of Contents

 

(a) 15% of the lesser of (i) the aggregate revolving commitments and (ii) the borrowing base and (b) $60 million, NMG will be required to maintain a pro forma ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated Fixed Charges (as such terms are defined in the credit agreement) of at least 1.1 to 1.0.  Our ability to meet the conditions described in this paragraph may be affected by events beyond our control.

 

NMG’s inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt service obligations, or to refinance its obligations at all or on commercially reasonable terms, would have an adverse effect, which could be material, on NMG’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The terms of NMG’s Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and Senior Secured Term Loan Facility and the indentures governing the Senior Notes, the Senior Subordinated Notes and the 2028 Debentures may restrict NMG’s current and future operations, particularly its ability to respond to changes in its business or to take certain actions.

 

The credit agreements governing NMG’s Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and Senior Secured Term Loan Facility and the indentures governing the Senior Notes, the Senior Subordinated Notes and the 2028 Debentures contain, and any future indebtedness of NMG would likely contain, a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions, including restrictions on NMG’s ability to engage in acts that may be in its best long-term interests. The indentures governing the Senior Notes, the Senior Subordinated Notes and the 2028 Debentures and the credit agreements governing the senior secured credit facilities include covenants that, among other things, restrict NMG’s ability to:

 

·                  incur additional indebtedness;

 

·                  pay dividends on NMG’s capital stock or redeem, repurchase or retire its capital stock or indebtedness;

 

·                  make investments;

 

·                  create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to NMG from NMG’s restricted subsidiaries;

 

·                  engage in transactions with its affiliates;

 

·                  sell assets, including capital stock of NMG’s subsidiaries;

 

·                  consolidate or merge;

 

·                  create liens; and

 

·                  enter into sale and lease back transactions.

 

In addition, NMG’s ability to borrow under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility is limited by the conditions described above.

 

Moreover, NMG’s Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility provides discretion to the agent bank acting on behalf of the lenders to impose additional availability restrictions and other reserves, which could materially impair the amount of borrowings that would otherwise be available to us. There can be no assurance that the agent bank will not impose such reserves or, were it to do so, that the resulting impact of this action would not materially and adversely impair NMG’s liquidity.

 

A breach of any of the restrictive covenants would result in a default under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and Senior Secured Term Loan Facility.  If any such default occurs, the lenders under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility and Senior Secured Term Loan Facility may elect to declare all outstanding borrowings under such facilities, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable, or enforce their security interest, any of which would result in an event of default under NMG’s Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes and 2028 Debentures. The lenders would also have the right in these circumstances to terminate any commitments they have to provide further borrowings.

 

The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in these debt agreements and any future financing agreements may adversely affect NMG’s ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities.

 

49



Table of Contents

 

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

 

The specialty retail industry is highly competitive.

 

The specialty retail industry is highly competitive and fragmented. Competition is strong both to attract and sell to customers and to establish relationships with, and obtain merchandise from, key vendors.

 

A number of different competitive factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, including:

 

·                  increased operational efficiencies of competitors;

 

·                  competitive pricing strategies, including deep discount pricing by a broad range of retailers during periods of poor consumer confidence or economic instability;

 

·                  expansion of product offerings by existing competitors;

 

·                  entry by new competitors into markets in which we currently operate; and

 

·                  adoption by existing competitors of innovative retail sales methods.

 

We compete for customers with specialty retailers, traditional and high-end department stores, national apparel chains, vendor-owned proprietary boutiques, individual specialty apparel stores and direct marketing firms. We compete for customers principally on the basis of quality and fashion, customer service, value, assortment and presentation of merchandise, marketing and customer loyalty programs and, in the case of Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman, store ambiance. In our Specialty Retail business, merchandise assortment is a critical competitive factor, and retail stores compete for exclusive, preferred and limited distribution arrangements with key designers. Many of our competitors are larger than we are and have greater financial resources than we do. In addition, certain designers from whom we source merchandise have established competing free-standing retail stores in the same vicinity as our stores. If we fail to successfully compete for customers or merchandise, our business will suffer.

 

We are dependent on our relationships with certain designers, vendors and other sources of merchandise.

 

Our relationships with established and emerging designers are a key factor in our position as a retailer of high-fashion merchandise, and a substantial portion of our revenues is attributable to our sales of designer merchandise. Many of our key vendors limit the number of retail channels they use to sell their merchandise and competition among luxury retailers to obtain and sell these goods is intense. Our relationships with our designers have been a significant contributor to our past success. We have no guaranteed supply arrangements with our principal merchandising sources. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that such sources will continue to meet our quality, style and volume requirements.

 

As a result of current economic conditions, some of our vendors have experienced serious cash flow issues, reductions in available credit from banks, factors or other financial institutions, or increases in the cost of capital.  To counteract their cash flow problems, our vendors may attempt to increase their prices, pass through increased costs, alter historical credit and payment terms available to us or seek other relief.  Any of these actions could have an adverse impact on our relationship with the vendor or constrain the amounts or timing of our purchases from the vendor and, ultimately, have an adverse impact on our revenues, profitability and liquidity.

 

Moreover, nearly all of the brands of our top designers are sold by competing retailers, and many of our top designers also have their own dedicated retail stores. If one or more of our top designers were to cease providing us with adequate supplies of merchandise for purchase or, conversely, were to 1) increase sales of merchandise through their own stores, 2) increase the sales of merchandise to our competitors or 3) alter the form in which their goods were made available to us for resale, our business could be adversely affected. In addition, any decline in the popularity or quality of any of our designer brands could adversely affect our business.

 

If we significantly overestimate our future sales, our profitability may be adversely affected.

 

We make decisions regarding the purchase of our merchandise well in advance of the season in which it will be sold. For example, women’s apparel, men’s apparel and shoes are typically ordered six to nine months in advance of the products being

 

50



Table of Contents

 

offered for sale while handbags, jewelry and other categories are typically ordered three to six months in advance.  If our sales during any season, particularly a peak season, are significantly lower than we expect for any reason, we may not be able to adjust our expenditures for inventory and other expenses in a timely fashion and may be left with a substantial amount of unsold inventory. If that occurs, we may be forced to rely on markdowns or promotional sales to dispose of excess inventory. This could have an adverse effect on our margins and operating income. At the same time, if we fail to purchase a sufficient quantity of merchandise, we may not have an adequate supply of products to meet consumer demand. This may cause us to lose sales or harm our customer relationships.

 

Our failure to identify changes in consumer preferences or fashion trends may adversely affect our performance.

 

Our success depends in large part on our ability to identify fashion trends as well as to anticipate, gauge and react to changing consumer demands in a timely manner. If we fail to adequately match our product mix to prevailing customer tastes, we may be required to sell our merchandise at higher average markdown levels and lower average margins. Furthermore, the products we sell often require long lead times to order and must appeal to consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty and often change rapidly. Consequently, we must stay abreast of emerging lifestyle and consumer trends and anticipate trends and fashions that will appeal to our consumer base. Any failure on our part to anticipate, identify and respond effectively to changing consumer demands and fashion trends could adversely affect our business.

 

A breach in information privacy could negatively impact our operations.

 

The protection of our customer, employee and company data is critically important to us.  We utilize customer data captured through both our proprietary credit card programs and our direct marketing activities. Our customers have a high expectation that we will adequately safeguard and protect their personal information.  The regulatory environment surrounding information security and privacy is evolving and increasingly demanding, with the frequent imposition of new and constantly changing requirements across all our business units.  A significant breach of customer, employee or company data could damage our reputation and relationships with our customers and result in lost sales, fines and lawsuits.

 

Our business and performance may be affected by our ability to implement our store expansion and remodeling strategies.

 

Based upon our expansion strategy, we expect that planned new stores will add over 189,000 square feet of new store space over approximately the next four fiscal years, representing an increase of approximately 3% above the current aggregate square footage of our full-line Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman stores.  New store openings involve certain risks, including constructing, furnishing and supplying a store in a timely and cost effective manner, accurately assessing the demographic or retail environment at a given location, hiring and training quality staff, obtaining necessary permits and zoning approvals, obtaining commitments from a core group of vendors to supply the new store, integrating the new store into our distribution network and building customer awareness and loyalty. In undertaking store remodels, we must complete the remodel in a timely, cost effective manner, minimize disruptions to our existing operations, and succeed in creating an improved shopping environment. If we fail to execute on these or other aspects of our store expansion and remodeling strategy, we could suffer harm to our sales, an increase in costs and expenses and an adverse effect on our business.

 

We outsource certain business processes to third-party vendors that subject us to risks, including disruptions in business and increased costs.

 

Some business processes that are dependent on technology are outsourced to third parties.  Such processes include credit card authorization and processing, insurance claims processing, payroll processing, record keeping for retirement and other benefit plans and other accounting processes.  In the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, we entered into agreements to outsource certain information technology functions.  In addition, we review outsourcing alternatives on a routine basis and may decide to outsource additional business processes in the future.  We make a diligent effort to ensure that all providers of outsourced services are observing proper internal control practices, such as redundant processing facilities; however, there are no guarantees that failures will not occur.  Failure of third parties to provide adequate services could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or ability to accomplish our financial and management reporting.

 

Acts of terrorism could adversely affect our business.

 

The economic downturn that followed the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 had a material adverse effect on our business. Any further acts of terrorism or other future conflicts may disrupt commerce and undermine consumer confidence, cause a downturn in the economy generally, cause consumer spending or shopping center traffic to decline or reduce the desire of our

 

51



Table of Contents

 

customers to make discretionary purchases. Any of the foregoing factors could negatively impact our sales revenue, particularly in the case of any terrorist attack targeting retail space, such as a shopping center. Furthermore, an act of terrorism or war, or the threat thereof, could negatively impact our business by interfering with our ability to obtain merchandise from foreign manufacturers. Any future inability to obtain merchandise from our foreign manufacturers or to substitute other manufacturers, at similar costs and in a timely manner, could adversely affect our business.

 

The loss of any of our senior management team or attrition among our buyers or key sales associates could adversely affect our business.

 

Our success in the specialty retail industry will continue to depend to a significant extent on our senior management team, buyers and key sales associates. We rely on the experience of our senior management, who have specific knowledge relating to us and our industry that would be difficult to replace. If we were to lose a portion of our buyers or key sales associates, our ability to benefit from long-standing relationships with key vendors or to provide relationship-based customer service may suffer. We may not be able to retain our current senior management team, buyers or key sales associates and the loss of any of these individuals could adversely affect our business.

 

Inflation, including price changes resulting from foreign exchange rate exchanges, may adversely affect our business operations in the future.

 

In recent years, we have experienced certain inflationary conditions in our cost base due primarily to (1) changes in foreign currency exchange rates that have reduced the purchasing power of the U.S. dollar, (2) increases in selling, general and administrative expenses, particularly with regard to employee benefits and (3) increases in fuel prices and costs impacted by increases in fuel prices, such as freight and transportation costs. Inflation can harm our margins and profitability if we are unable to increase prices or cut costs enough to offset the effects of inflation in our cost base. If inflation in these or other costs worsens, we may not be able to offset the effects of inflation and cost increases through control of expenses, passing cost increases on to customers or any other method.  Any future inflation could adversely affect our profitability and our business.

 

Failure to maintain competitive terms under our loyalty programs could adversely affect our business.

 

We maintain loyalty programs that are designed to cultivate long-term relationships with our customers and enhance the quality of service we provide to our customers. We must constantly monitor and update the terms of our loyalty programs so that they continue to meet the demands and needs of our customers and remain competitive with loyalty programs offered by other high-end specialty retailers. Given that approximately 40% of our total revenues during each of the last two calendar years was generated by our InCircle loyalty program members, our failure to continue to provide quality service and competitive rewards to our customers through the InCircle loyalty program could adversely affect our business.

 

Changes in our credit card arrangements, applicable regulations and consumer credit patterns could adversely impact our ability to facilitate the provision of consumer credit to our customers and adversely affect our business.

 

We maintain a proprietary credit card program through which credit is extended to customers under the “Neiman Marcus” and “Bergdorf Goodman” names. Because a majority of our revenues are transacted through our proprietary credit cards, changes in our proprietary credit card arrangement that adversely impact our ability to facilitate the provision of consumer credit may adversely affect our performance.

 

We entered into a five-year program agreement with HSBC in June 2005 which provides for a long-term marketing and servicing alliance under which HSBC offers proprietary credit card accounts to our customers under both the “Neiman Marcus” and “Bergdorf Goodman” brand names.  Under the terms of this alliance, HSBC offers credit cards and non-card payment plans and bears substantially all credit risk with respect to sales transacted on the cards bearing our brands. HSBC has discretion over certain policies and arrangements with our credit card customers and may change these policies and arrangements in ways that affect our relationship with these customers.

 

We receive ongoing payments from HSBC related to credit card sales and compensation for marketing and servicing activities. During fiscal year 2006, we outsourced various administrative elements of the proprietary credit card program to HSBC, including the processing of data, although we continue to handle key customer service functions, including customer inquiries and collections.

 

We have entered into various amendments to the Program Agreement with HSBC since its inception. These amendments, among other things, provide for 1) the allocation between HSBC and NMG of additional income, if any, to be generated from

 

52



Table of Contents

 

the credit card program as a result of certain changes made to the terms of credit extended to our customers and 2) the allocation of certain credit card losses between HSBC and NMG.  We may enter into additional amendments to the Program Agreement prior to its maturity in July 2010 to alter the allocation of both credit card losses and income in response to current economic conditions and other factors.

 

Credit card operations are subject to numerous federal and state laws that impose disclosure and other requirements upon the origination, servicing and enforcement of credit accounts and limitations on the maximum amount of finance charges that may be charged by a credit provider. Any regulation or change in the regulation of credit arrangements that would materially limit the availability of credit to our customer base could adversely affect our business.  Changes in credit card use, payment patterns, and default rates may result from a variety of economic, legal, social, and other factors that we cannot control or predict with certainty.

 

The Program Agreement with HSBC expires in July 2010.  We are currently in negotiations with HSBC and other providers with respect to a replacement to the Program Agreement.  Based upon current market conditions, we believe the future income to the Company pursuant to any replacement arrangement will be lower than the current HSBC Program Income earned pursuant to the Program Agreement.  Any changes in our credit card arrangements may adversely affect our credit card program and ultimately, our business.

 

Our business can be affected by extreme or unseasonable weather conditions.

 

Extreme weather conditions in the areas in which our stores are located could adversely affect our business. For example, heavy snowfall, rainfall or other extreme weather conditions over a prolonged period might make it difficult for our customers to travel to our stores and thereby reduce our sales and profitability. Our business is also susceptible to unseasonable weather conditions. For example, extended periods of unseasonably warm temperatures during the winter season or cool weather during the summer season could render a portion of our inventory incompatible with those unseasonable conditions. Reduced sales from extreme or prolonged unseasonable weather conditions would adversely affect our business.

 

We are subject to numerous regulations that could affect our operations.

 

We are subject to customs, truth-in-advertising and other laws, including consumer protection regulations and zoning and occupancy ordinances that regulate retailers generally and/or govern the importation, promotion and sale of merchandise and the operation of retail stores and warehouse facilities. Although we undertake to monitor changes in these laws, if these laws change without our knowledge, or are violated by importers, designers, manufacturers or distributors, we could experience delays in shipments and receipt of goods or be subject to fines or other penalties under the controlling regulations, any of which could adversely affect our business.

 

Our revenues and cash requirements are affected by the seasonal nature of our business.

 

The specialty retail industry is seasonal in nature, with a higher level of sales typically generated in the fall and holiday selling seasons. We have in the past experienced significant fluctuation in our revenues from quarter to quarter with a disproportionate amount of our revenues falling in our second fiscal quarter, which coincides with the holiday season. In addition, we have significant additional cash requirements in the period leading up to the months of November and December in anticipation of higher sales volume in those periods, including payments relating to additional inventory, advertising and employees.

 

Our business is affected by foreign currency fluctuations.

 

We purchase a substantial portion of our inventory from foreign suppliers whose costs are affected by the fluctuation of their local currency against the dollar or who price their merchandise in currencies other than the dollar. Fluctuations in the Euro-U.S. dollar exchange rate affect us most significantly; however, we source goods from numerous countries and thus are affected by changes in numerous currencies and, generally, by fluctuations in the U.S. dollar relative to such currencies.  Accordingly, changes in the value of the dollar relative to foreign currencies may increase the retail prices of goods offered for sale and/or increase our cost of goods sold.  If our customers reduce their levels of spending in response to increases in retail prices and/or we are unable to pass such cost increases to our customers, our revenues, gross margins, and ultimately our earnings, could decrease. Foreign currency fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations in the future.

 

53



Table of Contents

 

Conditions in, and the United States’ relationship with, the countries where we source our merchandise could affect our sales.

 

A substantial majority of our merchandise is manufactured overseas, mostly in Europe. As a result, political instability or other events resulting in the disruption of trade from other countries or the imposition of additional regulations relating to or duties upon imports could cause significant delays or interruptions in the supply of our merchandise or increase our costs, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. If we are forced to source merchandise from other countries, those goods may be more expensive or of a different or inferior quality from the ones we now sell. The importance to us of our existing designer relationships could present additional difficulties, as it may not be possible to source merchandise from a given designer from alternative jurisdictions. If we were unable to adequately replace the merchandise we currently source with merchandise produced elsewhere, our business could be adversely affected.

 

Significant increases in costs associated with the production of catalogs and other promotional materials may adversely affect our operating income.

 

We advertise and promote in-store events, new merchandise and fashion trends through print catalogs and other promotional materials mailed on a targeted basis to our customers. Significant increases in paper, printing and postage costs could affect the cost of producing these materials and as a result, may adversely affect our operating income.

 

We are indirectly owned and controlled by the Sponsors, and their interests as equity holders may conflict with those of our creditors.

 

We are indirectly owned and controlled by the Sponsors and certain other equity investors, and the Sponsors have the ability to control our policies and operations. The interests of the Sponsors may not in all cases be aligned with those of our creditors. For example, if we encounter financial difficulties or are unable to pay our debts as they mature, the interests of our equity holders might conflict with our creditors’ interests. In addition, our equity holders may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, financings or other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their equity investments, even though such transactions might involve risks to holders of our indebtedness. Furthermore, the Sponsors may in the future own businesses that directly or indirectly compete with us. One or more of the Sponsors also may pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us.

 

If we are unable to enforce our intellectual property rights, or if we are accused of infringing on a third party’s intellectual property rights, our net income may decline.

 

We and our subsidiaries currently own our tradenames and service marks, including the “Neiman Marcus” and “Bergdorf Goodman” marks. Our tradenames and service marks are registered in the United States and in various foreign countries, primarily in Europe. The laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Moreover, we are unable to predict the effect that any future foreign or domestic intellectual property legislation or regulation may have on our existing or future business. The loss or reduction of any of our significant proprietary rights could have an adverse effect on our business.

 

Additionally, third parties may assert claims against us alleging infringement, misappropriation or other violations of their tradename or other proprietary rights, whether or not the claims have merit. Claims like these may be time consuming and expensive to defend and could result in our being required to cease using the tradename or other rights and selling the allegedly infringing products. This might have an adverse affect on our sales and cause us to incur significant litigation costs and expenses.

 

Failure to successfully maintain and update information technology systems and enhance existing systems may adversely affect our business.

 

To keep pace with changing technology, we must continuously provide for the design and implementation of new information technology systems as well as enhancements of our existing systems. Any failure to adequately maintain and update the information technology systems supporting our online operations, sales operations or inventory control could prevent our customers from purchasing merchandise on our websites or prevent us from processing and delivering merchandise, which could adversely affect our business.

 

54



Table of Contents

 

Delays in receipt of merchandise in connection with either the manufacturing or shipment of such merchandise can affect our performance.

 

Substantially all of our merchandise is delivered to us by our vendors as finished goods and is manufactured in numerous locations, including Europe and the United States and, to a lesser extent, China, Mexico and South America. Our vendors rely on third party carriers to deliver merchandise to our distribution facilities. In addition, our success depends on our ability to source and distribute merchandise efficiently to our Specialty Retail stores and Direct Marketing customers. Events such as U.S. or foreign labor strikes, natural disasters, work stoppages or boycotts affecting the manufacturing or transportation sectors could increase the cost or reduce the supply of merchandise available to us and could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

ITEM 2.                   UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

None.

 

ITEM 4.                   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

None.

 

ITEM 6.                   EXHIBITS

 

2.1

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 1, 2005, among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Newton Acquisition, Inc., and Newton Merger Sub, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2005.

 

 

 

2.2

 

Purchase, Sale and Servicing Transfer Agreement dated as of June 8, 2005, among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. and HSBC Finance Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 8, 2005.

 

 

 

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Neiman Marcus, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-133184) dated April 10, 2006.

 

 

 

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Bylaws of Neiman Marcus, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-133184) dated April 10, 2006.

 

 

 

4.1

 

Indenture, dated as of May 27, 1998, between The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

 

 

4.2

 

Form of 7.125% Senior Notes Due 2028, dated May 27, 1998, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

 

 

4.3

 

Senior Indenture dated as of October 6, 2005, among Newton Acquisition, Inc., Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, trustee, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

4.4

 

Senior Subordinated Indenture dated as of October 6, 2005, among Newton Acquisition, Inc., Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, trustee, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

4.5

 

Form of 9%/9 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

55



Table of Contents

 

4.6

 

Form of 10 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

4.7

 

Registration Rights Agreement dated October 6, 2005, among Newton Acquisition, Inc., Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors, The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., and the Initial Purchasers, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

4.8

 

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 11, 2006, to the Indenture, dated as of May 27, 1998, among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Neiman Marcus, Inc., and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 11, 2006.

 

 

 

4.9

 

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 14, 2006, to the Indenture, dated as of May 27, 1998, among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Neiman Marcus, Inc., and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 15, 2006.

 

 

 

10.1*

 

Employment Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., Newton Acquisition, Inc., and Burton M. Tansky, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

 

 

10.2*

 

First Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Neiman Marcus, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Burton M. Tansky effective December 21, 2007, incorporated herein by reference to the Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 21, 2007.

 

 

 

10.3*

 

Second Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Neiman Marcus, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Burton M. Tansky effective January 1, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.4*

 

Rollover Agreement dated as of October 4, 2005 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Newton Acquisition, Inc., and Burton M. Tansky, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

 

 

10.5*

 

Amendment to Letter Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 by and between Neiman Marcus, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Burton M. Tansky, incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.6*

 

Form of Rollover Agreement by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Newton Acquisition, Inc., and certain members of management, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

 

 

10.7

 

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 15, 2009, among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., the Company, the other borrowers and guarantors named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and co-collateral agent, Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC as co-collateral agent, Banc of America Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Regions Business Capital Corporation as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners, Wells Fargo Retail Finance, LLC as syndication agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Regions Bank as co-documentation agents and the lenders thereunder, incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 16, 2009.

 

 

 

10.8

 

Credit Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005, among Newton Acquisition, Inc., Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors, Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent, Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as joint lead arrangers, Banc of America Securities LLC and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. as co-arrangers, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. as joint bookrunners, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P. as co-syndication

 

56



Table of Contents

 

 

 

agents and the lenders thereunder, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.9

 

Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement dated as of July 15, 2009 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., the Company, subsidiaries named therein and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and co-collateral agent, incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 16, 2009.

 

 

 

10.10

 

Substitution of Agent and Joinder Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2009, among Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Credit Suisse and Bank of America, N.A., incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 16, 2009.

 

 

 

10.11

 

Pledge and Security and Intercreditor Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005, among Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Newton Acquisition, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors and Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

 

 

10.12

 

Lien Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005, among Newton Acquisition, Inc., Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as revolving facility agent, and Credit Suisse, as term loan agent, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

10.13

 

Form of First Priority Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement from The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. to Credit Suisse, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

10.14

 

Form of First Priority Leasehold Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement from The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. to Credit Suisse, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

10.15

 

Form of Second Priority Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement from The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

10.16

 

Form of Second Priority Leasehold Mortgage, Assignment of Lease and Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement from The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

10.17

 

Amendment No. 1 dated as of October 6, 2005 to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005 among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Newton Acquisition, Inc., each subsidiary of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. from time to time party thereto, the Lenders thereunder, and Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and as collateral agent for the Lenders, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 2005.

 

 

 

10.18*

 

Newton Acquisition, Inc. Management Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2005.

 

 

 

10.19*

 

Amendment to the Newton Acquisition, Inc. Management Equity Incentive Plan effective as of January 1, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.20*

 

Stock Option Grant Agreement made as of November 29, 2005 between Newton Acquisition, Inc. and Burton M. Tansky, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2005.

 

57



Table of Contents

 

10.21*

 

Amendment to the Stock Option Grant Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 by and between Neiman Marcus, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Burton M. Tansky, incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.22*

 

Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement made as of November 29, 2005 between Newton Acquisition, Inc. and certain eligible key employees, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2005.

 

 

 

10.23*

 

Amendment to the Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 by and between Neiman Marcus, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and certain eligible key employees incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.24

 

Amendment No. 2 dated as of January 26, 2006 to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005, as amended, among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Newton Acquisition, Inc., each subsidiary of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. from time to time party thereto, the Lenders thereunder and Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent for the Lenders, incorporated by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 30, 2006.

 

 

 

10.25*

 

Employment Agreement between The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and Karen Katz, dated February 1, 2006, effective as of October 6, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 1, 2006.

 

 

 

10.26*

 

Amendment to Employment Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 by and between The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Karen Katz incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.27

 

Management Services Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2005 among Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., Newton Acquisition, Inc., TPG GenPar IV, L.P., TPG GenPar III, L.P. and Warburg Pincus LLC, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 28, 2006.

 

 

 

10.28

 

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 6, 2005, among Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc., Newton Acquisition, Inc., Newton Holding, LLC and the “Holders” identified therein as parties thereto, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 28, 2006.

 

 

 

10.29

 

Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 28, 2006, to the Pledge and Security Intercreditor Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005, among Neiman Marcus, Inc., The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., the Subsidiaries party thereto and Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 29, 2006.

 

 

 

10.30

 

Credit Card Program Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2005, by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. and Household Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.31

 

Servicing Agreement by and between The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.32*

 

Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Termination Benefits Agreement by and between Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., a New York corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., and James J. Gold dated May 3, 2004. (1)

 

 

 

10.33*

 

Amendment to the Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Termination Benefits Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 by and between Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., a New York corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. and James J. Gold incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

58



Table of Contents

 

10.34*

 

Form of Amendment to the Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Termination Benefits Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 by and between The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and certain eligible key employees incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.35

 

Stockholder Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2005, among Newton Acquisition, Inc., Newton Acquisition Merger Sub, Inc. and the other parties signatory thereto, incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2005.

 

 

 

10.36*

 

Neiman Marcus, Inc. Cash Incentive Plan amended as of January 21, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to the Neiman Marcus, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 26, 2008.

 

 

 

10.37

 

Management Stockholders’ Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005 between Newton Acquisition, Inc., Newton Holding, LLC, TPG Newton III, LLC, TPG Partners IV, L.P., TPG Newton Co-Invest I, LLC, Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private Equity VIII C.V. I, Warburg Pincus Germany Private Equity VIII K.G , Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P., and the other parties signatory thereto, incorporated herein by reference to the Neiman Marcus, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2006.

 

 

 

10.38

 

Amendment to the Management Stockholders’ Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 by and between Neiman Marcus, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Newton Holding, LLC, TPG Newton III, LLC, TPG Partners IV, L.P., TPG Newton Co-Invest I, LLC, Warburg Pincus Private Equity VIII, L.P., Warburg Pincus Netherlands Private Equity VIII C.V. I, Warburg Pincus Germany Private Equity VIII K.G., Warburg Pincus Private Equity IX, L.P., and the other parties signatory thereto incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.39*

 

The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan amended and restated effective January 1, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to the Neiman Marcus, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 26, 2008.

 

 

 

10.40*

 

Amendment No. 1 effective as of January 1, 2009 to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.41

 

Amendment No. 3 dated as of October 12, 2006 to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005 among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Neiman Marcus, Inc., each subsidiary of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. from time to time party thereto, the Lenders thereunder and Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent for the Lenders, incorporated by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 17, 2006.

 

 

 

10.42

 

Amendment No. 4 dated as of February 8, 2007 to the Credit Agreement dated as of October 6, 2005, among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Neiman Marcus, Inc., each subsidiary of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. from time to time party thereto, the lenders thereunder, and Credit Suisse, as administrative agent and collateral agent for the lenders incorporated herein by reference to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 14, 2007.

 

 

 

10.43

 

The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.44

 

The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated herein by reference to the Neiman Marcus, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 2, 2008.

 

 

 

10.45

 

Amendment No. 1 effective January 1, 2009 to the Amended and Restated Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Defined Contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan incorporated herein by reference to Neiman Marcus, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2009.

 

59



Table of Contents

 

10.46

 

First Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated as of April 30, 2006 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., and Household Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.47

 

Second Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated as of June 28, 2006 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A. and Household Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.48

 

Third Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated as of August 1, 2006 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., and Household Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.49

 

Fourth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated as of April 3, 2007 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., and HSBC Private Label Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.50

 

Fifth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated as of March 13, 2007 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., and HSBC Private Label Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

 

 

10.51

 

Sixth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated as of July 17, 2007 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., and HSBC Private Label Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.52

 

Seventh Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated April 21, 2008 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, HSBC Private Label Corporation, and HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.53

 

Eighth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated as of October 17, 2008 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., and HSBC Private Label Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.54

 

Ninth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated as of December 3, 2008 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., and HSBC Private Label Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009. (2)

 

 

 

10.55

 

Form of First Amendment to Second Priority Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Financing Statement from The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. to Bank of America, N.A., incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 1, 2009.

 

 

 

10.56*

 

Second Amendment to the Neiman Marcus, Inc. Management Equity Incentive Plan effective as of November 16, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.57*

 

Form of Amended and Restated Stock Option Agreement between the Company and certain eligible key employees, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009.

 

60



Table of Contents

 

10.58*

 

Form of Second Amended and Restated Stock Option Grant Agreement between the Company and certain eligible key employees, incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009.

 

 

 

10.59

 

Tenth Amendment to Credit Card Program Agreement dated as of December 17, 2009 by and among The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., Bergdorf Goodman, Inc., HSBC Bank Nevada, N.A., and HSBC Private Label Corporation. (1) (2)

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)

 

 

 

32

 

Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)

 


(1)           Filed herewith.

 

(2)           Portions of these exhibits have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

 

*              Current management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

61



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

 

NEIMAN MARCUS, INC.

(Registrant)

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ T. Dale Stapleton

 

Vice President and Controller

 

March 9, 2010

T. Dale Stapleton

 

and Duly Authorized Officer

 

 

 

 

(principal accounting officer)

 

 

 

62