UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C., 20549
FORM 10-K
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2009
Commission File: 001-15849
SANTANDER BANCORP
(Exact name of Corporation as specified in its charter)
Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
I.R.S. Employer Identification No. 66-0573723
B7 Tabonuco Street, 18th Floor, San Patricio,
Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968-3028
Telephone Number: (787) 777-4100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on
which registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $2.50 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer (as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Corporation (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (for such shorter
period that the Corporation was required to file such reports) and has been subject to such filing
requirement for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of December 31, 2009 the Corporation had 46,639,104 shares of common stock outstanding. The
aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Corporation was
$53,868,504 based upon the reported closing price of $12.28 on the New York Stock Exchange on that
date.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Corporations Proxy Statement relating to the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of the Corporation to be held on or about April 26, 2010, are incorporated herein by reference to
Item 10 through 14 of Part III.
Santander BanCorp
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Santander BanCorp (the Corporation) is a publicly owned financial holding company, registered
under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, (BHC Act) as amended and, accordingly, subject to
the supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve Board. The Corporation was incorporated
under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Puerto Rico or the Island) to serve as the
financial holding company for Banco Santander Puerto Rico (Banco Santander or the Bank).
Banco Santander, S.A., (SAN.MC, STD.N), (Santander Group) is a retail and commercial bank, based
in Spain, with presence in 10 main markets. At the end of 2009, Santander was the largest bank in
the euro zone by market capitalization and third in the world by profit. Founded in 1857,
Santander had EUR 1,245 billion in managed funds at the end of 2009. After the acquisition of
Sovereign Bancorp in the U.S. during January 2009, Santander has 90 million customers, 13,660
branches -more than any other international bank- and 170,000 employees. It is the largest
financial group in Spain and Latin America, with leading positions in the United Kingdom and
Portugal and a broad presence in Europe through its Santander Consumer Finance arm. In 2009,
Santander registered 8,943 million in net attributable profit.
The Corporation offers a full range of financial services through its subsidiaries Banco Santander
Puerto Rico, including mortgage banking, Santander Securities Corporation, Santander Insurance
Agency, Inc., Santander International Bank of Puerto Rico, Inc., Santander Asset Management
Corporation, Santander Financial Services, Island Insurance Corporation, currently inactive, and
Santander PR Capital Trust I. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had, on a consolidated
basis, total assets of $6.8 billion, total net loans of $5.3 billion, total deposits of $4.4
billion and stockholders equity of $595.9 million. The Corporation also had $13.5 billion of
customer financial assets under management.
Banco Santander Puerto Rico
The Corporations main subsidiary, Banco Santander Puerto Rico, is one of the Islands largest
financial institutions (based on number of branches and customer deposits as reported with the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial
Institutions of Puerto Rico) with a network of 54 branches and 145 ATMs, representing one of the
largest branch franchises in Puerto Rico. As of December 31, 2009, the Bank had total assets of
approximately $6.6 billion, total deposits of $4.5 billion and stockholders equity of $641.4
million.
The Bank provides a wide range of financial products and services to a diverse customer base that
includes small and medium-size businesses, large corporations and individuals, including mortgage
banking services. The Bank also provides specialized products and services to foreign customers
through its wholly owned subsidiary, Santander International Bank of Puerto Rico, Inc. (Santander
International Bank), an international banking entity organized under the International Banking
Center Regulatory Act of Puerto Rico (IBC Act).
Santander International Bank of Puerto Rico, Inc.
Santander International Bank of Puerto Rico, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Banco Santander
Puerto Rico, organized during 2001 to operate as an international banking entity under the
International Banking Center Regulatory Act of Puerto Rico. Santander International Bank was
created for the purpose of providing specialized products and services to foreign customers.
Santander Securities Corporation
Santander Securities Corporation (Santander Securities) is the second largest securities
broker-dealer (based on broker-dealer customer assets and mutual funds managed as reported with the
SEC and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico) in Puerto Rico
with approximately $9.4 billion in assets under management, composed of over $5.5 billion in
customer assets at the retail broker-dealer and $3.9 billion in managed gross assets and
institutional accounts at its wholly owned subsidiary, Santander Asset Management. Santander
Securities has three offices islandwide and an office in Miami, Fl.
3
Santander Asset Management Corporation
Santander Asset Management Corporation (Santander Asset Management or SAM) is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Santander Securities created for the purpose of managing assets for Puerto Rico
investment companies (mutual funds) and institutional accounts. The funds managed by Santander
Asset Management invest primarily in fixed-income securities, including Puerto Rico and U.S.
Government securities, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities and municipal obligations.
Santander Asset Management also services its institutional accounts, which consist primarily of
university endowments, insurance companies, governmental agencies, pension funds and individual
investors.
Santander Insurance Agency, Inc.
The Corporations subsidiary, Santander Insurance Agency, Inc. (Santander Insurance) was
established in October 2000 as the first financial holding company insurance operation to receive
approval from the Commissioner of Insurance of Puerto Rico (Insurance Commissioner). This was a
result of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) that authorized financial
holding companies to enter into the insurance business. Santander Insurance Agency offers a growing
base of products, including life, disability, unemployment and title insurance as a corporate
agent, and also operates as a general agent offering bid, payment and performance bonds, and
insurance to cover equipment and auto leases.
Santander Financial Services, Inc.
Santander Financial Services, Inc. (Santander Financial Services or Island Finance) is the
largest consumer finance company in Puerto Rico (as reported with the Office of the Commissioner of
Financial Institutions). Island Finance is a well established consumer finance business in Puerto
Rico. The brand has operated in Puerto Rico for over 40 years, is one of the most recognized brand
names in consumer finance and commands a 43% market share as of September 30, 2009 (as reported
with the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions). The acquisition of Island Finance
in 2006 boosted the Corporations business footprint by adding 60 consumer retail branches and
close to 123,000 clients. Santander Financial Services, Inc. through, Island Finance
provides mainly consumer loans and real estate-secured loans to customers.
Island Insurance Corporation
In July 2006, the Corporation acquired Island Insurance Corporation, a Puerto Rico life insurance
company, duly licensed by the Puerto Rico Commissioner of Insurance. This corporation is currently
inactive.
Santander PR Capital Trust I
A statutory trust organized under the Statutory Trust Act of the state of Delaware. It was formed
for the purpose of issuing trust redeemable preferred securities issued pursuant to the acquisition
of Island Finance in 2006.
Operations
The Corporation operates a client-oriented, full-service bank, offering products and services in
the areas of commercial, mortgage and consumer banking. Insurance, securities and asset management
services are also offered through the Corporations various subsidiaries. The Corporation organizes
its operations in five reportable segments: Commercial Banking, Mortgage Banking, Consumer Finance,
Treasury and Investments, and Wealth Management.
While the Bank offers a wide variety of financial services to its customers, its primary products
and services are grouped into the following categories:
Commercial Banking. The Corporations integrated business model is built upon the strength of its
commercial banking franchise and its distribution capabilities. This segments goal is to be an
agile client-service organization with the primary focus on satisfying the total financial needs of
its customers through specialized retail and wholesale banking services. These two units of the
commercial banking segment are closely interrelated and are differentiated mostly by the
composition of their respective client-bases.
Retail Banking. The Retail Banking unit serves individual clients and
small-and medium-sized businesses providing them with a full range of financial
products and services through branches across Puerto Rico. Each branch represents an
important vehicle for distributing the retail banking solutions. Branch personnel
promote cross selling of financial products and coordinate service delivery.
4
Wholesale Banking. The Wholesale Banking unit serves major corporate and
institutional clients including the public sector, not-for-profit organizations and
specialized industries such as universities, healthcare and financial institutions.
This unit also houses certain specialized services such as construction lending,
international commerce and cash management. Wholesale banking also calls into play
the substantial resources of our worldwide operations, when such involvement is deemed
appropriate or necessary to achieve the clients financial objectives. Wholesale
banking clients are offered a full array of commercial banking products and services,
including cash management, bank card products, letters of credit and a variety of
other foreign trade-related services. This unit works closely with retail banking
branch personnel when its specialized services are required.
Mortgage Banking. Through Santander Mortgage Corporation up to December 31,
2007 and as a Banks division thereafter, this business segment, the fifth largest
mortgage loan originator (based on information on mortgage production obtained from
the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico) and servicer
in Puerto Rico, originates, sells, and services a variety of residential mortgage
loans. Total mortgage loan originations amounted to $195.5 million in 2009, the
mortgage loan portfolio reached $2.4 billion by year-end and the mortgage servicing
portfolio consisted of $1.4 billion serviced for other institutions.
Consumer Finance. The Island Finance operation provides consumer loans and real estate-secured
loans through its 60 consumer retail branches in Puerto Rico. Island Finance provides lending to
near prime or Band C borrowers (individuals with Fair Isaac Corporation (Fico Scores) of 620 or
less among other factors), which represent approximately of 27.5% of total loan portfolio.
Treasury and Investments. The Corporations Treasury Department handles its investment portfolio
and liquidity position. It also focuses on offering another level of financial service to our
clients in the form of derivative instruments that can protect the owner of small and medium-sized
business from the impact of interest rate fluctuations.
Wealth Management. The Corporations Wealth Management segment includes the operations of its
subsidiary Santander Securities. Santander Securities offers a complete range of products and
services as part of an overall wealth management program that includes asset management and other
trust services. The combination of Santander Asset Management products and Santander Securities
distribution capabilities has allowed Santander Group to provide a diverse range of high quality
investment alternatives in the Puerto Rico market.
The principal offices of the Corporation are located at B7 Tabonuco Street, 18th Floor, San
Patricio, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, and the main telephone number is (787) 777-4100. The
Corporations Internet web site is
http://www.santandernet.com.
Forward Looking Statements
When used in this Form 10-K or future filings by Santander BanCorp with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, in the Corporations press releases or other public or shareholder communications, or
in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the word of phrases
would be, will allow, intends to, will likely result, are expected to, is anticipated,
estimate, project, believe , or similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The future results of the Corporation could be affected by subsequent events and could differ
materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. If future events and actual
performance differ from the Corporations assumptions, the actual results could vary significantly
from the performance projected in the forward-looking statements.
The Corporation wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date made, and to advise readers that various factors,
including regional and national conditions, substantial changes in levels of market interest rates,
credit and other risks of lending and investment activities, competitive and regulatory factors and
legislative changes, could affect the Corporations financial performance and could cause the
Corporations actual results for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or
projected. The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update
any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances
after the date of such statements.
5
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
Overview
The Corporation and its banking subsidiary are subject to extensive federal and Puerto Rico banking
regulations that impose restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight of the
Corporation and its operations. Set forth below is a summary description of material laws and
regulations that relate to the operations of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, including the
Bank. This summary description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the particular statutes and regulations described. Supervision,
regulation and examination of banks by regulatory agencies are intended primarily for the
protection of depositors, the deposit insurance fund of the FDIC, other clients of the institution
and the banking system as a whole, and not for the benefit of the Corporations shareholders.
Future changes in laws, regulations or policies that impact the Corporation and its subsidiaries,
including the Bank, cannot be predicted and may have a material effect on our business and
earnings. Legislation relating to banking and other financial services has been introduced from
time to time in Congress and is likely to be introduced in the future. If enacted, such
legislation could significantly change the competitive environment in which the Corporation and its
subsidiaries operate. The Corporation cannot predict whether these or any other proposals will be
enacted or the ultimate impact of any such legislation on our competitive situation, financial
condition or results of operations.
Holding Company Operations Federal Regulation
General
The BHC Act and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act). The Corporation is a bank holding company
registered under the BHC Act and subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve). As a bank holding company, the
Corporation is required to file periodic and annual reports with the Federal Reserve and other
information concerning its own business operations and those of its subsidiaries. The BHC Act
subjects bank holding companies to particular restrictions on the types of activities in which they
may engage, and to a range of supervisory requirements and activities, including regulatory
enforcement actions for violations of laws and regulations. The BHC Act requires that a bank
holding company obtain prior Federal Reserve Board approval before: (i) acquiring direct or
indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of the voting shares of any bank; (ii)
acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of any bank; or (iii) merging or consolidating
with another bank holding company. The Federal Reserve Board also has authority to issue cease and
desist orders against holding companies and their non-bank subsidiaries.
The BHC Act prohibits a bank holding company, with limited exceptions, from engaging in any
business other than the business of banking, or of managing or controlling banks, and to any other
activity that the Federal Reserve deems to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper
incident thereto.
Enacted in 1999, the GLB Act revised and expanded the existing provisions of the BHC Act by
permitting a bank holding company to elect to become a financial holding company to engage in a
full range of financial activities. The law eliminated the legal barriers to affiliations among
banks and securities firms, insurance companies and other financial services companies. The law
reserved the role of the Federal Reserve as the supervisor for bank holding companies. At the same
time, it also provided a system of functional regulation which is designed to utilize the various
existing federal and state regulatory bodies. The qualification requirements provide that in order
for a bank holding company to elect to be treated as a financial holding company (and to maintain
such treatment), all the subsidiary banks controlled by the bank holding company at the time of
election to become a financial holding company must be and remain at all times well capitalized
and well managed. Under the law, financial holding companies and banks that desire to engage in
new financial activities are required to have a satisfactory or better Community Reinvestment Act
(CRA) rating when they commence the new activity. On May 15, 2000, the Corporation elected to
become a financial holding company under the provisions of the GLB Act.
Financial holding companies may engage, directly or indirectly, in any activity that is determined
to be (i) financial in nature, (ii) incidental to such financial activity, or (iii) complementary
to a financial activity and does not pose a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of
depository institutions or to the financial system generally. The GLB Act, specifically provides
that the following activities have been determined to be financial in nature: (a) lending, trust
and other banking activities; (b) insurance activities; (c) financial or economic advice or
services; (d) pooled investments; (e) securities underwriting and dealing; (f) existing bank
holding company domestic activities; (g) existing bank holding company foreign activities; and (h)
merchant banking activities. Santander Insurance Agency, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Corporation, offers
6
insurance agency services. Santander Securities, which is also a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Corporation, offers securities brokerage, dealing and underwriting services.
In addition, the GLB Act specifically gives the Federal Reserve the authority, by regulation or
order, to expand the list of financial or incidental activities, but requires consultation with
the U.S. Treasury, and gives the Federal Reserve authority to allow a financial holding company to
engage in any activity that is complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a
substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository institutions or the financial system
generally.
Under the GLB Act, if the Corporation fails to continue to meet any of the requirements for
financial holding company status, the Corporation must enter into an agreement with the Federal
Reserve to comply with all applicable requirements. If the Corporation is unable to cure such
deficiencies within certain prescribed periods of time, the Federal Reserve could require the
Corporation to divest control of its depository institution subsidiaries or alternatively cease
conducting financial activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies that are not
financial holding companies.
Under Federal Reserve policy, a bank holding company such as the Corporation is expected to act as
a source of financial strength for its banking subsidiary and is required to commit resources to
support the Bank. Moreover, an obligation to support the Bank may be required at times when, absent
such policy, the Corporation might not be inclined to provide it. In addition, any capital loans by
a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks must be subordinated in right of payment to
deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. In the event of a bank holding
companys bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to the federal bank regulatory
agency to maintain capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and be
entitled to a priority of payment. The Bank is currently the only subsidiary depository
institution of the Corporation.
The GLB Act also modified other laws, including laws related to financial privacy and community
reinvestment. These financial privacy provisions generally prohibit financial institutions,
including the Corporations bank subsidiary, from disclosing nonpublic personal financial
information to third parties unless customers have the opportunity to opt out of the disclosure.
USA Patriot Act
The USA Patriot Act of 2001 (the USA Patriot Act) was enacted in response to the terrorist
attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. The statute amended the Bank Secrecy Act and broadened
the application of anti-money laundering regulations to apply to additional types of financial
institutions, such as broker-dealers, and strengthened the ability of the U.S. government to
prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Under the statute, all
financial institutions, including the Corporation and the Bank, are required in general to verify
the identity of clients, adopt formal and comprehensive anti-money laundering programs, scrutinize
or prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern, and be prepared to respond to
inquiries from U.S. law enforcement agencies concerning their customers and their transactions.
Additional information-sharing among financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement
authorities is encouraged by the presence of an exemption from the privacy provisions of the GLB
Act for financial institutions that comply with this provision and the authorization of the
Secretary of the Treasury to adopt rules to further encourage cooperation and information-sharing.
The U.S. Treasury Department (U.S. Treasury) has issued a number of regulations implementing the
USA Patriot Act that apply certain of its requirements to financial institutions. The regulations
impose new obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and
controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and financing of terrorists.
Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA Patriot Acts requirements could have
serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. The Corporation and its
subsidiaries have adopted policies, procedures and controls designed to comply with the USA Patriot
Act and regulations adopted thereunder by the U.S. Treasury.
Privacy Policies
The GLB Act requires financial institutions to adopt and implement policies and procedures
regarding the disclosure of non-public personal information about consumers to non-affiliated third
parties and the protection of customer data from unauthorized access. In general, the statute
requires explanations to consumers on policies and procedures regarding the disclosure of such
non-public personal information, and, except as otherwise required by law, prohibits disclosing
such information except as provided in the institutions policies and procedures. The Corporation
and its subsidiaries have adopted
7
policies and procedures in order to comply with the privacy provisions of the GLB Act, pursuant to
which all its existing and new customers are notified of the privacy policies.
Dividend Restrictions
The Corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank and our other subsidiaries
and affiliated entities. The principal sources of our cash flow, including cash flow to pay
dividends to our shareholders, are dividends that the Bank and our other subsidiaries pay us as
their sole shareholder. Various statutory and regulatory limitations limit the amount of dividends
that the Bank can pay the Corporation, as well as to the dividends that the Corporation can pay to
its shareholders. The policy of the Federal Reserve that a bank holding company should serve as the
source of strength to its subsidiary banks also results in the position of the Federal Reserve that
a bank holding company should not maintain a level of cash dividends to its shareholders that
places undue pressure on the capital of its bank subsidiaries or that can be funded through
additional borrowings or other arrangements that may undermine the bank holding companys ability
to serve as such a source of strength.
The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have also issued policy statements that provide that bank
holding companies and their insured banks should generally pay dividends only out of current
operating earnings. The Federal Reserve has indicated that in the current financial and economic
environment bank holding companies should carefully review their dividend policy and has
discouraged dividend pay-out ratios that are at the 100% or higher level unless the asset quality
and the capital of the institution are very strong.
The Corporations ability to pay dividends is also subject to the provisions of Puerto Rico
corporations law which requires that dividends be paid out only from the Corporations net assets
in excess of capital or in the absence of such excess, from the Corporations net earnings for such
fiscal year and/or the preceding fiscal year.
The ability of the Bank to declare and pay dividends on its common stock is restricted by the
Puerto Rico Banking Law. In general terms, the Puerto Rico Banking Law provides that when the
expenditures of a bank are greater than receipts, the excess of expenditures over receipts shall be
charged against undistributed profits of the bank and the balance, if any, shall be charged against
the required reserve fund of the bank. If there is an insufficient reserve fund to cover such
balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount shall be charged against the banks capital
account. The Bank may not declare any dividends under the statute until its capital has been
restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the original capital.
In light of the continuing challenging general economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the global
capital markets, in August 2008 the Board of Directors of the Corporation voted to discontinue the
payment of the quarterly cash dividend on the Corporations common stock to strengthen the
institutions core capital position. The Corporation may use a portion of the funds previously paid
as dividends to reduce its outstanding debt. The Corporations decision is part of the significant
actions it has proactively taken in order to face the on-going challenges presented by the Puerto
Rico economy, which among others, include: maintaining an on-going strict control on operating
expenses; an efficiency plan driven to lower its current efficiency ratio; and merging its mortgage
banking and commercial banking subsidiaries.
The payment of dividends by the Corporation, or by the Bank, may also be affected by other factors,
such as the requirement to maintain adequate capital above regulatory guidelines. The FDIC has
indicated that paying dividends that deplete a depository institutions capital base to an
inadequate level would be an unsafe and unsound banking practice. Moreover, under the FDIA, a
depository institution may not pay any dividend if payment would cause the depository institution
to become undercapitalized or if it already is undercapitalized.
Federal Home Loan Bank System
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system. The FHLB system consists of
twelve regional FHLBs governed and regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Board. Among other
benefits, each FHLB serves as reserve or central bank for its member institutions within its
assigned region. Each FHLB is funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated
obligations of the FHLB system. Each make available loans or advances to its members in accordance
with policies and procedures established by the FHLB system and the boards of directors of each
regional FHLB.
The Bank is a member of the FHLB of New York. As such, the Bank is required to own capital stock in
that FHLB in an amount equal to the greater of: (i) 1.0% of the aggregate outstanding principal
amount of its residential mortgage loans, home purchase contracts and similar obligations at the
beginning of each calendar year, or (ii) 5.0% of its FHLB outstanding advances or borrowings. At
December 31, 2009, the Bank met the required investment in FHLB stock, holding $55.4 million in
8
capital stock of the FHLB of New York. All loans, advances and other extensions of credit made by
the FHLB of New York to the Bank are secured by a portion of the Banks mortgage loan portfolio,
certain other investments and the FHLB capital stock owned by the Bank.
Limitations on Transactions with Affiliates
Transactions between depository institutions and any affiliate are governed by Sections 23A and 23B
of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W adopted by the Federal Reserve, which
codifies prior regulations under Sections 23A and 23B and provides interpretative guidance with
respect to affiliate transactions. An affiliate of a depository institution is any company or
entity, which controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the depository
institution. In a holding company context, the parent bank holding company and any companies which
are controlled by such parent holding company (or by the ultimate parent company of such bank
holding company) are affiliates of the depository institution. In general, subject to certain
specified exemptions, under Section 23A, depository institutions and their subsidiaries are limited
in their ability to engage in covered transactions with any one affiliate to an amount equal to
10% of the depository institutions capital stock and surplus, and contain an aggregate limit on
all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such institutions capital
stock and surplus. Affiliate transactions are also subject to Section 23B which generally requires
that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the
depository institution or subsidiary as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions
with non-affiliated persons. The term covered transaction includes the making of loans, purchase
of assets, issuance of a guarantee and other similar transactions. In addition, loans or other
extensions of credit by the depository institution to the affiliate are required to be
collateralized in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act.
Loans to Insiders
Sections 22(h) and (g) of the Federal Reserve Act and its implementing regulation, Regulation O,
restrict loans by a bank to executive officers, directors and principal stockholders. Under Section
22(h), loans to a director, an executive officer and to a greater-than-10% stockholder of a bank
and certain of their related interests, or insiders, and insiders of affiliates, may not exceed,
together with all other outstanding loans to such person and related interests, the banks
loans-to-one-borrower limit, generally equal to 15% of the institutions unimpaired capital and
surplus. Section 22(h) also requires that loans to insiders and to insiders of affiliates be made
on terms substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons, unless the
loans are made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that (i) is widely available to
employees of the bank and (ii) does not give preference to insiders over other employees of the
bank. Section 22(h) also requires prior board of directors approval for certain loans. In
addition, the aggregate amount of extensions of credit by a depository institution to all insiders
cannot exceed the institutions unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore, Section 22(g) places
additional restrictions on loans to executive officers.
Capital Requirements
The Federal Reserve has adopted capital risked-based guidelines to evaluate the capital adequacy of
bank holding companies. Under these guidelines, specific categories of assets are assigned
different risk weights based generally on the perceived credit risk of the asset, with the
categories ranging from 0% (requiring no additional capital) for assets such as cash to 100% for
the bulk of assets which are typically held by a bank holding company, including multi-family
residential and commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans and commercial loans.
These risks weights are multiplied by corresponding asset balances to determine a risk-weighted
asset base. The Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines generally require bank holding
companies to maintain total capital equal to 8.0% of total risk-adjusted assets, with at least 4.0%
consisting of Tier I or core capital and the rest consisting of Tier II or supplementary capital.
Tier I capital for bank holding companies generally consists of the sum of common stockholders
equity and perpetual preferred stock, subject to limitations on the kind and amount of such
perpetual preferred stock which may be included as Tier I capital, less goodwill and, with certain
exceptions, intangibles. Tier II capital generally consists of hybrid capital instruments,
perpetual preferred stock which is not eligible to be included as Tier I capital, term subordinated
debt and intermediate-term preferred stock, and, subject to limitations, generally allowances for
loan losses. Total capital is the sum of Tier I and Tier II capital. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporations Tier I risk-based capital ratio was 10.6% and our total risk-based capital ratio was
15.55%.
In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the Federal Reserve requires bank holding
companies to maintain a minimum leverage capital ratio of Tier I capital to total consolidated
assets of 3.0%. Total consolidated assets for purposes of this calculation do not include goodwill
and any other intangible assets and investments that the Federal Reserve determines should be
deducted from Tier I capital. Certain top-rated bank holding companies without supervisory,
financial or operational weaknesses or deficiencies or those which are not experiencing or
anticipating significant growth may maintain a minimum
9
leverage capital ratio of 3.0%. Other bank holding companies are required to maintain a leverage
capital ratio of at least 4.0%. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporations leverage capital ratio
was 7.98%.
The federal banking agencies risk-based and leverage ratios are minimum supervisory ratios
generally applicable to banking organizations that meet certain specified criteria. The federal
bank regulatory agencies may set capital requirements for a particular banking organization that
are higher than the minimum ratios when circumstances warrant. Federal Reserve guidelines also
provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be
expected to maintain strong capital positions, substantially above the minimum supervisory levels,
without significant reliance on intangible assets.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision proposed new risk-based international capital standards
(Basel II) in June 2004, and the new framework is currently being evaluated and implemented by
bank supervisory authorities worldwide. Basel II is an effort to update the original international
bank capital accord (Basel I), which has been in effect since 1988. Basel II is intended to
improve the consistency of capital regulations internationally, make regulatory capital more risk
sensate, and promote enhanced risk-management practices. A definitive final rule for implementing
the advanced approaches of Basel II in the United States, which applies only to certain large or
internationally active or core banking organizations (defined as those with consolidated total
assets of $250 billion or more or consolidated on-balance sheet foreign exposures of $10 billion or
more) became effective on April 1, 2008. Other U.S. banking organizations may elect to adopt the
requirements of this rule (if they meet applicable qualification requirements), but are not
required to comply. The rule also allows a banking organizations primary federal supervisor to
determine that application of the rule would not be appropriate in light of the banks asset size,
level of complexity, risk profile or scope of operations.
To correct differences between core and non-core banking organizations, Basel IA was proposed in
late 2006 presenting modifications to the general risk-based capital rules for non-core banking
organizations that do not adopt the advanced approaches. After considering the comments on both the
Basel IA and the advanced approaches, in July 2008, the agencies proposed a new rule that would
provide all non-core banking organizations with an option to adopt the standardized approach under
Basel II. This alternative provides a more risk sensitive capital framework to institutions not
adopting the advanced approaches without unduly increasing regulatory burden. Comments on the
proposed rule were due to the agencies by October 27, 2008, but a definitive final rule has not
been issued. The proposed rule, if adopted, will replace the Basel IA approach.
In light of the weaknesses revealed by the financial market crisis, in January 2009, the Basel
Committee on Banking Supervision issued a consultative package proposing enhancements to strengthen
the regulation and supervision of internationally active banks. The proposed enhancements will help
ensure that the risks inherent in banks portfolios related to trading activities, securitizations
and exposures to off-balance sheet vehicles are better reflected in minimum capital requirements,
risk management practices and accompanying disclosures to the public.
The Corporation does not meet the criteria in the new U.S. rules which would make adoption of the
new Basel II rules mandatory.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOA) was enacted to address corporate and accounting
improprieties. SOA contains reforms of various business practices and numerous aspects of
corporate governance. The SOA generally applies to all companies, both U.S. and non-U.S., that
file or are required to file periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). The SOA
includes additional public disclosure requirements and new corporate governance rules.
SOA addresses, among other matters: (i) expansion of the authority and responsibilities of audit
committees, (ii) certification of financial statements by the chief executive officer and the chief
financial officer, (iii) the forfeiture of bonuses or other incentive base compensation and profits
from the sale of an issuers securities by directors and senior officers in the twelve-month period
following initial publication of any financial statements that later require restatement, (iv) a
prohibition on insider trading during pension plan black-out periods, (v) disclosure of off-balance
sheet transactions, (vi) a prohibition on personal loans to directors and officers, (vii) expedited
filing requirements for Form 4s, (viii) disclosure of a code of ethics and filing of a Form 8-K
for a change or waiver of such code and protection for whistleblowers and informants, (ix) real
time filing of periodic reports, (x) the formation of an independent accounting oversight board
(PCAOB) to oversee the audit of public companies and auditors who perform such audits, (xi)
auditor independence provisions which restrict the non-audit services that independent accountants
may provide to their audit clients, and (xii) various increased criminal penalties for fraud and
other violations of securities laws.
10
Change of Control
Federal law restricts the amount of voting stock of a bank holding company and a state bank that a
person may acquire without the prior approval of banking regulators. The overall effect of such
laws is to make it more difficult to acquire a bank holding company and a bank by tender offer or
similar means than it might be to acquire control of another type of corporation. Regulations
pursuant to the BHC Act and the Change in Bank Control Act generally require prior FDIC and Federal
Reserve approval for an acquisition of control of an insured institution or its holding company,
respectively, by any person or persons acting in concert. Control is deemed to exist if, among
other things, a person (or persons acting in concert) acquires more than 25% of any class of voting
stock of an insured institution or its holding company. Control is presumed to exist subject to
rebuttal, if a person (or persons acting in concert) acquires more than 10% of any class of voting
stock and either (i) the company has securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or
(ii) no person will own, control or hold the power to vote a greater percentage of that class of
voting securities immediately after the transaction. The concept of acting in concert is very
broad and also is subject to certain rebuttable presumptions, including among others, that
relatives, business partners, management officials, affiliates and others are presumed to be acting
in concert with each other and their businesses. The FDICs regulations implementing the Change in
Bank Control Act are generally similar to those described above.
The Banking Law requires the approval of the Commissioner for changes in control of a Puerto Rico
bank. See Banking Operations-Puerto Rico Regulation.
Banking Operations
General
The Bank is a Puerto Rico corporation chartered as a commercial bank under the Banking Law of
Puerto Rico. The Bank is a state bank and an insured depository institution under the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA), and a foreign bank within the meaning of the International
Banking Act of 1978. The Bank is not a member of the Federal Reserve System, making it primarily
subject to regulation and supervision by the Commissioner and the FDIC. The federal and Puerto
Rico laws and regulations that apply to banks regulate, among other things, the scope of their
business, their investments, their reserves against deposits, the types and amounts of loans that
may be granted and the interest that they may charge, the timing of the availability of deposited
funds, the nature and amount of and collateral for certain loans and the types of services they may
offer. As a creditor and financial institution, the Bank is subject to consumer laws and
regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve, which also affect its operations. In addition to
the impact of regulation, commercial banks are affected significantly by the actions of the Federal
Reserve as it attempts to control the money supply and credit availability in order to influence
the economy.
The Bank is subject to periodic examinations by the Commissioner and the FDIC. The regulatory
structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their
supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to
the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory
purposes. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil
money penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions
against banks and their affiliates. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for
violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound banking practices. In addition, certain
actions are required by statute and implementing regulations. Other actions or inaction may
provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed by a bank
with regulatory authorities.
FDIC Capital Requirements
The FDIC has promulgated regulations and adopted a statement of policy regarding the capital
adequacy of state-chartered banks, like the Bank, that are not members of the Federal Reserve
System. For purposes of the FDIA, Puerto Rico is treated as a state and the Bank as such is a
state-chartered non-member bank. These requirements are substantially similar to those adopted by
the Federal Reserve regarding bank holding companies, as described above. The FDIA, among other
things, requires federal banking agencies to take prompt corrective action in respect of
depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. Under this system, the
federal banking regulators have established five capital categories (well capitalized, adequately
capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized) in
which all institutions are placed. The relevant capital measures are the total risk-based capital
ratio, the Tier I risk-based capital ratio and the leverage ratio. Federal banking regulators are
required to take various mandatory supervisory actions and are authorized to take other
discretionary actions with respect to institutions in the three undercapitalized categories. The
severity of the action depends upon the capital category in which the institution is placed. The
federal banking agencies have specified by regulation
11
the relevant capital for each category. A well capitalized depository institution, for example,
must maintain a leverage ratio of at least 5.0%, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of at least 6.0%
and a total risk-based capital ration of at least 10.0% and not be subject to any written agreement
or directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level.
An institution that is categorized as undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or
critically undercapitalized is required to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan to its
appropriate federal banking regulator. An undercapitalized institution is also generally
prohibited from increasing its average total assets, making acquisitions, establishing any branches
or engaging in any new line of business, except under an accepted capital restoration plan or with
FDIC approval. The regulations also establish procedures for downgrading an institution to a lower
capital category based on supervisory factors other than capital.
Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject an insured bank like the Bank to a variety of
prompt corrective actions and enforcement remedies under the FDIA, including, with respect to an
insured bank, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, and to certain restrictions on its
business. In general terms, undercapitalized depository institutions are prohibited from making any
capital distributions (including dividends), are subject to restrictions on borrowing from the
Federal Reserve System, and are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit capital
restoration plans.
At December 31, 2009, the Bank met the capital requirements of a well capitalized institution.
An institutions capital category, as determined by applying the prompt corrective action
provisions of law, may not constitute an accurate representation of the overall financial condition
or prospects of the institution. The capital condition of the Bank should be considered in
conjunction with other available information regarding the Corporations financial condition and
results of operations.
FDIC Deposit Insurance Assessments
Banco Santander is subject to FDIC deposit insurance assessments. On February 8, 2006, the Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the Reform Act) was signed by the President. The Reform
Act provided for the merger of the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and Savings Association Insurance
Fund (SAIF) into a single Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), increase in the maximum amount of FDIC
insurance coverage for certain retirement accounts, and possible inflation adjustments in the
maximum amount of coverage available with respect to other insured accounts. In addition, it
granted a one-time initial assessment credit to recognize institutions past contributions to the
fund.
On October 3, 2008, President George W. Bush signed into law the Emergency Economic Stabilization
Act of 2008 (EESA), which temporarily raised the basic limit on federal deposit insurance
coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor. The temporary increase in deposit insurance
coverage became effective upon the Presidents signature. On September 9, 2009, the FDIC Board of
Directors approved a rule to finalize: (1) the deposit insurance coverage regulations to reflect
the extension of the temporary increase in the standard maximum deposit insurance amount (SMDIA) to
$250,000 through December 31, 2013.
The deposits of Banco Santander are insured up to the applicable limits by the DIF of the FDIC and
are subject to the deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. Banco Santander Puerto Rico
paid $7.2 million of regular insurance premium to the FDIC during 2009.
Under the Reform Act, the FDIC made significant changes to its risk-based assessment system so that
effective January 1, 2007, the FDIC imposes insurance premium based upon a matrix that is designed
to more closely tie what banks pay for deposit insurance to the risk they pose. The new FDIC
risk-based assessment system imposes premium based upon factors that vary depending upon the size
of the bank. These factors are: for banks with less than $10 billion in assets-capital level,
supervisory rating, weighted average CAMELS component rating, and certain financial ratios; and for
banks with $10 billion up to $30 billion in assets-capital level, supervisory rating, weighted
average CAMELS component rating, certain financial ratios and (if at least one is available)
long-term debt issuer ratings, and additional risk information; and for banks with over $30 billion
in assets- capital level, supervisory rating, weighted average CAMELS component rating, debt issuer
ratings (unless none are available in which case certain financial ratios are used), and additional
risk information. The FDIC subsequently adopted a new base schedule of rates that the FDIC can
adjust up or down, depending on the revenue needs of the DIF, and set initial premiums that range
from 5 cents per $100 of domestic deposits for the banks in the lowest risk category to 43 cent per
$100 of domestic deposits for banks in the highest risk category. This assessment system resulted
in a 2008 annual assessment rate on the deposits of Banco Santander of 7 cents per $100 of
deposits. Effective January 1, 2009, FDIC increased assessment rates uniformly by 7 basis points
(annual rate) for the first quarter 2009 assessment period only. Annual rates applicable to the
first quarter 2009 assessments, which would was collected at the end of June 2009, are based on:
(i) risk
12
category I: 12 14 basis points; (ii) risk category II: 17 basis points; (iii) risk category III:
35 basis points; and (iv) risk category IV: 50 basis points.
On November 21, 2008, the Board of Directors of the FDIC approved the Temporary Liquidity
Guarantee Program (TLGP) to strengthen confidence and encourage liquidity in the banking system.
The TLGP is comprised of the Debt Guarantee Program (DGP) and the Transaction Account Guarantee
Program (TAGP). The DGP guarantees all newly issued senior unsecured debt (e.g., promissory
notes, unsubordinated unsecured notes and commercial paper) up to prescribed limits issued by
participating entities, including bank holding companies, beginning on October 14, 2008 and
continuing through October 31, 2009. For eligible debt issued by that date, the FDIC will provide
the guarantee coverage until the earlier of the maturity date of the debt or June 30, 2012. The
TAGP offers a full guarantee for non interest-bearing transaction deposit accounts held at
FDIC-insured depository institutions. The unlimited deposit coverage is voluntary for eligible
institutions and is in addition to the $250,000 FDIC deposit insurance per depositor that was
included as part of the EESA. The TAGP coverage became effective on October 14, 2008 and will
continue for participating institutions until December 31, 2009. Participants in the DGP program
have a fee structure based on a sliding scale, depending on length of maturity. Shorter-term debt
has a lower fee structure and longer-term debt have a higher fee. The range is 50 basis points on
debt of 180 days or less, and a maximum of 100 basis points for debt with maturities of one year or
longer, on an annualized basis. Any eligible entity that has not chosen to opt out of the TAGP is
assessed, on a quarterly basis, an annualized 10 cents per $100 fee on balances in non interest
bearing transaction accounts that exceed the existing deposit insurance limit of $250,000. The
Corporation is only participating on the TAGP program.
On May 22, 2009, the Board of Directors of the FDIC adopted a final rule to impose an emergency
special assessment of 5 cents per $100 based on factors such as capital level, supervisory rating,
certain financial ratios and risk information on each insured depository institution assets minus
Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009. The amount of special assessment for any institution will no
exceed 10 basis points times the institutions assessment base for the second quarter 2009. The
special assessment was collected on September 30, 2009. The Corporation paid $3.2 million of this
emergency special assessment.
The FDIC amended its regulations requiring insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly
risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. The
prepaid assessment for these periods was collected on December 31, 2009, along with each
institutions regular quarterly risk-based deposit insurance assessment for the third quarter of
2009. For purposes of estimating an institutions assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and
for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012, and calculating the amount that an institution prepaid on December
31, 2009, the institutions assessment rate was its total base assessment rate in effect on
September 30, 2009. On September 29, 2009, the FDIC increased annual assessment rates uniformly by
3 basis points beginning in 2011. As a result, an institutions total base assessment rate for
purposes of estimating an institutions assessment for 2011 and 2012 will be increased by an
annualized 3 basis points beginning in 2011. Again, for purposes of calculating the amount that an
institution prepaid on December 30, 2009, an institutions third quarter 2009 assessment base will
be increased quarterly at a 5 percent annual growth rate through the end of 2012. The FDIC will
begin to draw down an institutions prepaid assessments on March 30, 2010, representing payment for
the regular quarterly risk-based assessment for the fourth quarter of 2009.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had a prepaid of $25.8 of estimated quarterly risk-based
deposit insurance assessment. Events during the prepayment period, such as slower deposit growth or
changes in CAMELS ratings, may cause an institutions actual assessments to differ from the
pre-paid amount. Assessment billing will account for events that occur during the prepayment period
and may result in an institution either paying assessments in cash before the prepayment period has
concluded or ultimately receiving a rebate of unused amounts.
The Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 separated the Financing Corporation (FICO) assessment to
service the interest on its bond obligations from the DIF assessment. The amount assessed on
individual institutions by the FICO is in addition to the amount, if any, paid for deposit
insurance according to the FDICs risk-related assessment rate schedules. The FICO assessment rate
for the fourth quarter of 2009 was $1.06 per $100 of DIF-assessable deposits. As of December 31,
2009, the Bank had a DIF deposit assessment base of approximately $4.5 billion.
The FDIC may terminate its insurance of deposits if it finds after a hearing that the depository
institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound
condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or
condition imposed by an agreement with the FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily
during the hearing process for the permanent termination of insurance.
13
Community Reinvestment Act
The Bank has a responsibility under the CRA and related regulations, to help meet the credit needs
of its entire community, including low-and moderate-income neighborhoods consistent with safe and
sound banking practice. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for
such banks nor does it limit an institutions discretion to develop the types of products and
services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA.
The CRA requires each federal banking agency, in connection with its examination of an insured
depository institution, to assess and assign one of four ratings to the institutions record of
meeting the credit needs of its community. An institutions failure to comply with the provisions
of the CRA could lead to potential penalties, including regulatory denials of applications to
expand branches, relocate, add subsidiaries and affiliates, expand into new financial activities
and merge with or purchase other financial institutions. The CRA also requires that all
institutions make public disclosure of their CRA ratings. The Bank received a rating of
outstanding from the FDIC on its last CRA examination report dated August 2008.
Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation
The United States has imposed economic sanctions that affect transactions with designated foreign
countries, nationals and others. These are generally known as the OFAC rules as they are
administered by the U.S. Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). The
OFAC-administered sanctions targeting countries take many different forms. Generally, however, they
may contain one or more of the following elements: (i) restrictions on trade with or investment in
a sanctioned country, including prohibitions against direct or indirect imports from and exports to
a sanctioned country and prohibitions on U.S. persons engaging in financial transactions relating
to making investments in, or providing investment-related advice or assistance to a sanctioned
country; and (ii) a blocking of assets in which the government or specially designated nationals of
the sanctioned country have an interest, by prohibiting transfers of property subject to U.S.
jurisdiction (including property in the possession or control of U.S. persons). Blocked assets
(e.g., property and bank deposits) cannot be paid out, withdrawn, set off or transferred in any
manner without a license from OFAC. Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious legal
and reputational consequences.
Brokered Deposits
FDIC regulations adopted under the FDIA govern the receipt of brokered deposits by banks. Well
capitalized institutions such as the Bank are not subject to limitations on brokered deposits,
while adequately capitalized institutions are able to accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits
only with a waiver from the FDIC and subject to certain restrictions on the yield paid on such
deposits. Undercapitalized institutions are not permitted to accept brokered deposits. The Bank
does not believe the brokered deposits regulation has had or will have a material effect on the
funding or liquidity of the Bank.
Federal Limitations on Activities and Investments
The activities and equity investments of FDIC-insured, state-chartered banks (which under the FDIA
include banking institutions incorporated under the laws of Puerto Rico) are generally limited to
those permitted under applicable state laws and are permissible for national banks. Under
regulations dealing with equity investments, an insured state bank generally may not directly or
indirectly acquire or retain any equity investment of a type, or in an amount, that is not
permissible for a national bank. However, an insured state bank is not prohibited from, among
other things, (i) acquiring or retaining a majority interest in a subsidiary, [(ii) investing as a
limited partner in a partnership the sole purpose of which is direct or indirect investment in the
acquisition, rehabilitation or new construction of a qualified housing project, provided that such
limited partnership investments may not exceed 2% of the banks total assets, (iii) acquiring up to
10% of the voting stock of a company that solely provides or reinsures director, trustees and
officers liability insurance coverage or bankers blanket bond group insurance coverage for
insured depository institutions, and][confirm source] (iv) acquiring or retaining the voting shares
of a depository institution if certain requirements are met. In addition, an insured
state-chartered bank may not, directly or indirectly through a subsidiary, engage as principal in
any activity that is not permissible for a national bank unless the FDIC has determined that such
activities would pose no risk to the insurance fund of which it is a member and the bank is in
compliance with applicable regulatory capital requirements. Any insured state-chartered bank that
is directly or indirectly engaged in any activity that is not permitted for a national bank must
cease such impermissible activity.
14
Interstate Branching
Effective June 1, 1997, the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994
(the Riegle-Neal Act) amended the FDIA and certain other statutes to permit state and national
banks with different home states to merge across state lines, with approval of the appropriate
federal banking agency, unless the home state of a participating bank had passed legislation prior
to May 31, 1997 expressly prohibiting interstate mergers. States are also allowed to permit de
novo interstate branching. Under the Riegle-Neal Act amendments, once a state or national bank has
established branches in a state through an interstate merger transaction, the bank may establish
and acquire additional branches at any location in the state where any bank involved in the
interstate merger transaction could have established or acquired branches under applicable federal
or state law. A bank that has established a branch in a state through de novo branching (if
permitted under state laws) may establish and acquire additional branches in such state in the same
manner and to the same extent as a bank having a branch in such state as a result of an interstate
merger. If a state opted out of interstate branching within the specified time period, no bank in
any other state may establish a branch in the state which has opted out, whether through an
acquisition or de novo.
For purposes of the Riegle-Neal Acts amendments to the FDIA, the Bank is treated as a state bank
and is subject to the same restriction on interstate branching as other state banks. However, for
purposes of the IBA, the Bank is considered to be a foreign bank and may branch interstate by
merger or de novo to the same extent as a domestic bank in the Banks home state.
Banking Operations-Puerto Rico Regulation
General
As a commercial bank organized under the laws of Puerto Rico, the Bank is subject to the
supervision, examination and regulation of the Commissioner, pursuant to the Puerto Rico Banking
Act of 1933, as amended (the Banking Law). The Banking Law contains provisions governing the
incorporation and organization, rights and responsibilities of directors, officers and stockholders
as well as the corporate powers, lending limitations, capital requirements, investment requirements
and other aspects of the Bank and its affairs. In addition, the Commissioner is given extensive
rule making power and administrative discretion under the Banking Law.
Section 12 of the Banking Law requires the prior approval of the Commissioner with respect to a
transfer of capital stock of a bank that results in a change of control of the bank. Under Section
12, a change of control is presumed to occur if a person or a group of persons acting in concert,
directly or indirectly, acquire more than 5% of the outstanding voting capital stock of the bank.
The Commissioner has interpreted the restrictions of Section 12 as applying to acquisitions of
voting securities of entities controlling a bank, such as a bank holding company. Under the
Banking Law, the determination of the Commissioner whether to approve a change of control filing is
final and non-appealable.
Section 16 of the Banking Law requires every bank to maintain a legal reserve which, except as
otherwise provided by the Commissioner, may not be less than 20% of its demand liabilities,
excluding government deposits (federal, state and municipal) which are secured by actual
collateral. The reserve is required to be composed of any of the following securities or a
combination thereof: (1) legal tender of the United States; (2) checks on banks or trust companies
located in Puerto Rico, to be presented for collection on the day after the day they are received;
(3) money deposited in other banks or depository institutions, subject to immediate collection; (4)
federal funds sold to any Federal Reserve Bank and securities purchased under agreement to resell
executed by the bank to the extent such funds are subject to be repaid to the bank on or before the
close of the next business day; and (5) any other asset that the Commissioner determines from time
to time.
Section 17 of the Banking Law permits Puerto Rico commercial banks to make loans to any one person,
firm, partnership or corporation, up to an aggregate amount of 15% the sum of: (i) paid-in
capital; (ii) reserve fund of the commercial bank; and (iii) any other components that the
Commissioner may determine from time to time. As of December 31, 2009, the legal lending limit for
the Bank under this provision was approximately $66.2 million. If such loans are secured by
collateral worth at least 25% more than the amount of the loan, the aggregate maximum amount may
reach one third of the sum of the Banks paid-in capital, reserve fund, retained earnings and any
such other components approved by the Commissioner. If the bank is well capitalized and had been
rated 1 in the last examination performed by the Commissioner or any regulatory agency, its legal
lending limit shall also include 15% of 50% of its undivided profits and for loans secured by
collateral worth at least 25% more than the amount of the loan, the capital of the bank shall also
include 33 1/3% of 50% of its undivided profits. Institutions rated 2 in their last regulatory
examination may include this additional component in their legal lending limit only with the prior
authorization of the Commissioner. There are no restrictions under Section 17 of the Banking Law on
the amount of loans
15
which are wholly secured by bonds, securities and other evidences of indebtedness of the
Governments of the United States or of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or by bonds, not in
default, of authorities, instrumentalities or dependencies of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or
its municipalities.
Section 17 of the Banking Law also prohibits banks from making loans secured by their own stock,
and from purchasing their own stock in connection therewith, unless such purchase is necessary to
prevent losses because of a debt previously contracted in good faith. The stock so purchased by a
bank must be sold by it in a public or private sale within one year from the date of purchase.
Section 27 of the Banking Law requires that at least 10% of the yearly net income of the Bank be
credited annually to a reserve fund until the amount deposited to the credit of the reserve fund is
equal to the total paid-in capital on common and preferred stock of the Bank. As of December 31,
2009, the Bank transfer $2.6 million to Reserve Fund.
Section 27 of the Banking Law also provides that when the expenditures of a bank are greater than
receipts, the excess of the expenditures over receipts must be charged against the undistributed
profits of the bank, and the balance, if any, shall be charged against the reserve fund, as a
reduction thereof. If the reserve fund is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in
part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the capital account and no dividends may be
declared until capital has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the
original capital of the bank.
Section 14 of the Banking Law authorizes the Bank to conduct certain financial and related
activities directly or through subsidiaries, including finance leasing of personal property,
operating small loans companies and mortgage loans activities. The Bank currently has one
wholly-owned subsidiary, Santander International Bank, an international banking entity operating
under the International Banking Center Regulatory Act of Puerto Rico (the IBC Act).
The Finance Board, which is composed of the Commissioner, the Secretary of the Treasury, the
Secretary of Economic and Commercial Development, the Secretary of Consumer Affairs, the President
of the Economic Development Bank, the President of the Planning Board, the President of the
Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico, the Executive President of the Public Corporation for
the Supervision and Insurance of Cooperatives and the Insurance Commissioner, has the authority to
regulate the maximum interest rates and finance charges that may be charged on loans to individuals
and unincorporated businesses in Puerto Rico. The current regulations of the Finance Board provide
that the applicable interest rate on loans to individuals and unincorporated businesses, including
real estate development loans but excluding certain other personal and commercial loans secured by
mortgages on real estate properties and finance charges on retail installment sales and for credit
card purchases, is to be determined by free competition. Regulations adopted by the Finance Board
deregulated the maximum finance charges on retail installment sales contracts, and for credit card
purchases. These regulations do not set a maximum rate for charges on retail installment sales
contracts and for credit card purchases and set aside previous regulations which regulated these
maximum finance charges. Furthermore, there is no maximum rate set for installment sales contracts
involving motor vehicles, commercial, agricultural and industrial equipment, commercial electric
appliances and insurance premiums.
IBC Act
Santander International Bank, an international banking entity (IBE), is subject to supervision
and regulation by the Commissioner under the IBC Act. Under the IBC Act, no sale, encumbrance,
assignment, merger, exchange or transfer of shares, interest or participation in the capital of an
IBE may be initiated without the prior approval of the Commissioner, if by such transaction a
person or persons acting in concert would acquire, directly or indirectly, control of 10% or more
of any class of stock, interest or participation in the capital of the IBE. Such authorization
must be requested at least 30 days prior to the transaction. The IBC Act and the regulations issued
thereunder by the Commissioner limit the business activities that may be carried out by an IBE. The
activities of Santander International Bank are limited to dealing with persons and assets located
outside Puerto Rico. The IBC Act further provides that every IBE must have not less than $300,000
of unencumbered assets or acceptable financial securities in Puerto Rico.
Under the IBC Act, without the prior approval of the Office of the Commissioner, Santander
International Bank may not amend its articles of incorporation or issue additional shares of
capital stock or other securities convertible into additional shares of capital stock unless such
shares are issued directly to the shareholders of Santander International Bank previously
identified in the application to organize the IBE, in which case notification to the Commissioner
must be given within ten (10) business days following the date of the issue.
16
Pursuant to the IBC Act, Santander International Bank must maintain its original accounting books
and records in its principal place of business in Puerto Rico. Santander International Bank is also
required to submit to the Commissioner quarterly and annual reports of its financial condition and
results of operations, including annual audited financial statements.
The IBC Act empowers the Commissioner to revoke or suspend, after notice and hearing, a license
issued to an international banking entity if, among other things, the IBE fails to comply with the
IBC Act, the regulations issued thereunder, or the terms of its license, or if the Commissioner
finds that the business of the IBE is conducted in a manner not consistent with the public
interest.
Mortgage Banking Operations
The mortgage banking business conducted by the Bank is subject to the rules and regulations of FHA,
VA, FNMA, FHLMC, HUD and GNMA with respect to originating, processing, selling and servicing
mortgage loans and the issuance and sale of mortgage-backed securities. Those rules and
regulations, among other things, prohibit discrimination and establish underwriting guidelines
which include provisions for inspections and appraisals, required credit reports on prospective
borrowers and fix maximum loan amounts and, with respect to VA loans, fix maximum interest rates.
Moreover, mortgages lenders are required annually to submit to FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC, GNMA and HUD,
audited financial statements, and each regulatory entity has its own financial requirements. Our
mortgage banking business is also subject to supervision and examination by FHA, VA, FNMA, FHLMC,
GNMA and HUD at all times to assure compliance with the applicable regulations, policies and
procedures. Mortgage origination activities are subject to, among others, the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, Federal Truth-in-Lending Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the
regulations promulgated thereunder.
Mortgage loan production activities are subject to the Federal Truth-in-Lending Act and Regulation
Z promulgated thereunder. This Act contains disclosure requirements designed to provide consumers
with uniform, understandable information with respect to the terms and conditions of loans and
credit transactions in order to give them the ability to compare credit terms. The
Truth-in-Lending Act provides consumers with a three-day right to cancel certain credit
transactions, including the refinancing of any mortgage or junior mortgage on a consumers primary
residence.
The Bank is required to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B promulgated
thereunder, which prohibit lenders from discriminating against applicants on the basis of race,
color, sex, age or marital status, and restrict creditors from obtaining certain types of
information from loan applicants. These requirements mandate certain disclosures by lenders
regarding consumer rights and require lenders to advice applicants of the reasons for any credit
denial. In instances where the applicant is denied credit or the rate or charge for the loan
increases as a result of information obtained from a consumer credit agency, another statute, The
Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970, as amended, requires that the lenders supply the applicant with
the name and address of the reporting agency. The Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act imposes,
among other things, limits on the amount of funds a borrower can be required to deposit in any
escrow account for the payment of taxes, insurance premiums and other taxes.
The mortgage banking operation is licensed by the Commissioner under the Puerto Rico Mortgage
Banking Law (the Mortgage Banking Law), and as such is subject to regulation by the Commissioner,
with respect to, among other things, licensing requirements, maximum origination fees on certain
types of mortgage loans products, and the recordkeeping, examination and reporting requirements
under that statute. The authorization to act as a mortgage banking institution under the Mortgage
Banking Law must be renewed each year. Although the Bank believes that it is in compliance in all
material respects with applicable Federal and Puerto Rico laws, rules and regulations related to
its mortgage banking business, there can be no assurance that more restrictive laws or rules will
not be adopted in the future, which could make compliance more difficult or expensive, restricting
the Banks ability to originate or sell mortgage loans or sell mortgage-backed securities, further
limit or restrict the amount of interest and other fees earned from the origination of mortgage
loans, or otherwise adversely affect the business or prospects of the Bank.
The Mortgage Banking Law requires the prior approval of the Commissioner for the acquisition of
control of any mortgage banking institution licensed under such law. For purposes of the Mortgage
Banking Law, the term control means the power to direct or influence decisively, directly or
indirectly, the management or policies of a mortgage banking institution. The Mortgage Banking Law
provides that a transaction that results in the holding of less than 10% of the outstanding voting
securities of a mortgage banking institution shall not be considered a change in control.
17
Broker-Dealer Operations
Santander Securities is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and the Commissioner, and is
also a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). As a registered
broker-dealer, it is subject to regulation, examination and supervision by the SEC, the
Commissioner and FINRA which can affect its manner of operation and profitability. Such
regulations cover a broad range of subject matters. Rules and regulations for registered
broker-dealers cover such issues as: net capital requirements; sales and trading practices; use of
client funds and securities; the conduct of directors, officers and employees; record-keeping and
recording; supervisory procedures to prevent improper trading on material non-public information;
qualification and licensing of sales personnel; and limitations on the extension of credit in
securities transactions.
Santander Securities is subject to the net capital rule of the Exchange Act, which specify minimum
net capital requirements for registered broker-dealers. The net capital requirements are designed
to ensure that broker-dealers maintain regulatory capital in relation to their liabilities and the
size of their customer business. If Santander Securities fails to maintain its minimum required net
capital, it would be required to cease executing customer transactions until it came back into
compliance. This could result in Santander Securities losing its FINRA membership, its
registration with the SEC, or require a complete liquidation. As of December 31, 2009, Santander
Securities was in compliance with the required net capital under the rule.
The SECs risk assessment rules also apply to Santander Securities as a registered broker-dealer.
These rules require broker-dealers to maintain and preserve records and certain information,
describe risk management policies and procedures, and report on the financial condition of
affiliates whose financial and securities activities are reasonably likely to have a material
impact on the financial and operational condition of the broker-dealer.
Insurance Operations
Santander Insurance Agency is licensed as a corporate agent and general agency by the Office of the
Commissioner of Insurance of Puerto Rico (the Insurance Commissioner). As such, Santander
Insurance Agency is subject to regulation, examination and supervision by the Insurance
Commissioner. The applicable regulations relate to, among other things, licensing of employees,
sales practices, charging of commissions and obligations to customers.
Island Insurance Corporation is licensed as an insurance company with the Insurance Commissioner.
Island Insurance Corporation is subject to regulation, examination and supervision by the Insurance
Commissioner. As of December 31, 2009, this corporation was inactive.
Recent Puerto Rico Legislation
On March 9, 2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed Law 7 (Law 7) which seeks to increase the
tax revenues of the Puerto Rico Government with certain permanent and temporary measures. Law 7
includes the following amendments: (i) for taxable years commenced after December 31, 2008 and
before January 1, 2012, taxable corporations (such as the Corporation and the Bank) would be
subject to a separate tax of 5% based on their total tax liability; (ii) for taxable years
commenced after December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012, international banking entities that
do not operate as bank units would be subject to a 5% income tax on their entire net income
computed in accordance with the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code of 1994, as amended (the PR
Code); (iii) certain income tax credits granted to financial institutions in relation to
financing provided for the acquisition of new or existing homes may no longer generate a tax refund
for any taxable year commenced on or before December 31, 2010 and after such date, this refundable
tax credit will not generate interest for the period elapsed between the claim of refund and its
payment by the Puerto Rico Treasury Department (as further discussed below); (iv) certain income
tax credits granted to developers of projects in designated urban areas which serve as source of
repayment for construction loans will not be available during the taxable years commenced after
December 31, 2008 and before January 1, 2012; and (v) net income subject to alternative minimum tax
in the case of individuals (AMT) now includes various categories of exempt income and income
subject to preferential tax rates under the PR Code (as further discussed below).
Shareholders of the Corporation will now have to take into consideration for purposes of computing
their AMT income subject to preferential tax rates such as: (i) long-term capital gains on the sale
of their Corporation stock which enjoys a preferential tax rate of 10% under PR Code Section 1014;
(ii) dividends from the Corporation that are taxable at the rate of 10% under PR Code Section 1012;
(iii) interest on bank deposits and individual retirement accounts subject to the special 10% and
17% preferential income tax rates, respectively; and (iv) interest from notes or bonds eligible for
the special 10% tax rate provided by Section 1013A of the PR Code. These changes may affect this
income by subjecting it to AMT. The AMT top rate of 20% starts on alternative minimum taxable
income in excess of $175,000. Also, the vast majority of tax-exempt income covered by Section 1022
of the PR Code and other special laws is subject to AMT pursuant to the provisions of Law 7. A
notable
18
exception is the interest income derived from U.S. and Puerto Rico Government obligations which
continues to be exempt for AMT purposes even after the enactment of Law 7.
On December 2007, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed Law 197 (Law 197) which provided certain
credits when individuals purchase certain new or existing homes. The maximum amount of credits
under Law 197 amounted to $220,000,000 and such amount was reached before its December 31, 2008
sunset. The incentives under Law 197 were as follows: (a) for a new constructed home constituting
the individuals principal residence, a credit equal to 20% of the sales price or $25,000, whichever
is lower; (b) for new constructed homes that will not constitute the individuals principal
residence, a credit of 10% of the sales price or $15,000, whichever is lower; and (c) for existing
homes a credit of 10% of the sales price or $10,000, whichever is lower.
The income tax credit provided under Law 197 may be used against income taxes, including estimated
taxes, for years commencing after December 31, 2007 in three installments, subject to certain
limitations, between January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2011; the credit may be ceded, sold or otherwise
transferred to any other person. Any tax credit not used in a given tax year, as certified by the
Secretary of Treasury, may be claimed as a refund but only for taxable years commenced after
December 31, 2010 and after such date, this refundable tax credit will not generate interest for
the period elapsed between the claim of refund and its payment by the Puerto Rico Treasury
Department.
Employees
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation and its subsidiaries have approximately 1,764 employees.
None of its employees are represented by a collective bargaining group. The Corporation considers
its employee relations to be good.
Availability at our website
We make available free of charge, through our investor relations section at our internet website,
www.santandernet.com, our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K reports and all amendments to those
reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or
furnished to the SEC.
19
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The Corporation is subject to risk in several areas. Discussed below, and elsewhere in this report,
are the various risk factors that could cause the Corporations financial condition and results of
operations to vary significantly from period to period. Please refer to the Regulation and
Supervision section of this report for more information about legislative and regulatory risks.
Also refer to the MD&A section, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, and the
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data sections in this report for additional information
about credit, interest rate and market risks. Any factor described below or elsewhere in this
report or in our 2009 Annual Report to Stockholders could, by itself or together with one or more
other factors, have a material adverse effect on the Corporations financial condition and results
of operations.
General business, economic and political conditions. The Corporations businesses and earnings are
affected by general economic and political conditions in Puerto Rico and the United States of
America. General business and economic conditions that could affect the Corporation include
short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in both debt and
equity capital markets, and the strength of the United States and Puerto Rico economies. A period
of reduced economic growth or a recession has historically resulted in a reduction in lending
activity and an increase in the rate of defaults on loans. A recession may have an adverse impact
on net interest income and fee income. The Corporation may also experience significant losses on
the loan portfolio due to defaults as customers become unable to meet their obligations, which
would result in an adverse effect on earnings as higher reserves for loan losses would be required.
Geopolitical conditions can also affect the Corporations earnings. Acts or threats of terrorism,
actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to acts or threats of terrorism
and/or military conflicts, could affect the general business and economic conditions in Puerto
Rico, United States and abroad.
The Corporations financial activities and credit exposure are concentrated in Puerto Rico. As a
result, the Corporations financial condition and results of operations are highly dependent on
economic conditions in Puerto Rico. An extended economic slowdown, adverse political or economic
developments or natural disasters such as hurricanes, affecting Puerto Rico could result in a
reduction in lending activities and an increase in the level of non-performing assets and charge
offs, all of which would adversely affect the Corporations profitability.
Competition. The Corporation operates in a highly competitive environment in Puerto Rico composed
of other local and international banks as well as mortgage banking companies, insurance companies
and brokers-dealers. Increased competition could require that the Corporation lower rates charged
on loans or increase rates offered on deposits, which could adversely affect profitability.
The Corporations business model is based on a diversified mix of businesses that provide a broad
range of financial products and services, delivered through multiple distribution channels. The
Corporations success depends, in part, on its ability to adapt its products and services to
evolving industry standards. There is increasing pressure to provide products and services at
lower prices. This can reduce the Corporations net interest margin and income from fee-based
products and services. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including
internet services, could require the Corporation to incur in substantial expenditures to modify or
adapt its existing products and services in order to remain competitive. The Corporation is at
risk of not being successful or timely in introducing new products and services, responding or
adapting to changes in consumer spending and saving habits, achieving market acceptance of its
products and services, or developing and maintaining loyal customers.
Interest rate risk. Net interest income is the interest earned on loans, securities and other
assets minus the interest paid on deposits, long-term and short-term debt and other liabilities.
Net interest income is the difference between the yield on assets and the rate paid on deposits and
other sources of funding. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors beyond the
Corporations control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various
governmental and regulatory agencies. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest
rates, will influence the origination of loans, the prepayment speed of loans, the purchase of
investments, the generation of deposits and the rates received on loans and investment securities
and paid on deposits or other sources of funding. The impact of these changes may be magnified if
the Corporation does not effectively manage the relative sensitivity of its assets and liabilities
to changes in market interest rates.
Changes in interest rates could adversely affect net interest margin. Although the yield earned on
assets and funding costs tend to move in the same direction in response to changes in interest
rates, one can rise or fall faster than the other, causing the Corporations net interest margin to
expand or contract. The Corporations liabilities tend to be shorter in duration than its assets,
so they may adjust faster in response to changes in interest rates.
20
Changes in the slope of the yield curve or the spread between short-term and long-term
interest rates could also reduce the Corporations net interest margin. Normally, the yield
curve is upward sloping, meaning short-term rates are lower than long-term rates. However, since
the Corporations liabilities tend to be shorter in duration than its assets, they may adjust
faster in response to changes in interest rates. As a result, when interest rates rise, the
Corporations funding costs may rise faster than the yield earned on its assets causing net
interest margin to contract until the yield catches up.
The Corporation assesses its interest rate risk by estimating the effect on earnings under various
scenarios that differ based on assumptions about the direction, magnitude and speed of interest
rate changes and the slope of the yield curve. Some interest rate risk is hedged with derivatives.
However, not all interest rate risk is hedged. There is always the risk that changes in interest
rates could reduce net interest income and earnings in material amounts, especially if actual
conditions turn out to be materially different than what the Corporation expected. For example, if
interest rates rise or fall faster than the Corporation assumed, or the slope of the yield curve
changes, the Corporation may incur significant losses on debt securities held as investments. To
reduce interest rate risk, the Corporation may rebalance its investment and loan portfolios,
refinance its debt and take other strategic actions. Certain losses or expenses may be incurred
when such strategic actions are taken. Refer to the Risk Management Asset Liability Management
section of the MD&A.
Credit Risk. When the Corporation lends money or commits to lend money or enters into a contract
with a counterparty, it incurs credit risk, or the risk of losses if borrowers do not repay their
loans or counterparties fail to perform according to the term of their contract. The Corporation
allows for and reserves against credit risks based on its assessment of credit losses inherent in
its loan portfolio (including unfunded credit commitments). The process for determining the amount
of the allowance for loan losses is critical to the Corporations financial condition and results
of operations. It requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments, including forecasts of
economic conditions and how these economic predictions might impair the ability of borrowers to
repay their loans. As is the case with any such assessments, there is always the chance that the
Corporation will fail to identify the proper factors or that it will fail to accurately estimate
the impacts of factors that are identified.
For further discussion of credit risk and the Corporations credit risk management policies and
procedures, refer to Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality in the MD&A.
Changes in market prices of managed assets. The Corporation earns fee income from managing assets
for others and providing brokerage services. Since investment management fees are often based on
the value of assets under management, a fall in the market prices of those assets could reduce the
Corporations fee income. Changes in stock market prices could affect the trading activity of
investors, reducing commissions and other fees earned from the brokerage business.
Changes in accounting standards. The Corporations accounting policies are fundamental to
understanding its financial condition and results of operations. Some of these policies require
the use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of assets or liabilities and
financial results. Several of our accounting policies are critical because they require management
to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and
because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions
or using different assumptions. For a description of the Corporations critical accounting
policies, refer to Critical Accounting Policies in the MD&A.
From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the SEC and other regulatory
bodies, change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of
external financial statements. These changes are beyond the Corporations control, can be
difficult to predict and could materially impact how it reports financial condition and results of
operations. In some cases, the Corporation could be required to apply a new or revised standard
retroactively, resulting in the restatement of prior period financial statements.
Federal and state regulations. The Corporation, the banking and non banking subsidiaries are
subject to extensive state and federal regulation, supervision and legislation that govern almost
all aspects of its operations. These regulations protect depositors, federal deposit insurance
funds, consumers and the banking system as a whole, not stockholders. The Corporation and its non
banking subsidiaries are also heavily regulated by securities regulators. This regulation is
designed to protect investors in securities we sell or underwrite. Congress and state legislatures
and foreign, federal and state regulatory agencies continually review laws, regulations and
policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including
interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect the Corporation
in substantial and unpredictable ways including limiting the types of financial services and
products it may offer and increasing the ability of non banks to offer competing financial services
and products. Implementation of regulatory changes could also be costly to the Corporation.
21
Governmental fiscal and monetary policy. The Corporations earnings are affected by domestic and
international monetary policy. For example, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. These policies, to a large extent,
determine the Corporations cost of funds for lending and investing and the returns earned on those
loans and investments, both of which affect net interest margin. These policies can also affect the
value of financial instruments, such as debt securities and mortgage servicing rights as well as
affecting as borrowers by potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans.
The Corporations earnings are also affected by the fiscal policies that are adopted by various
governmental authorities of Puerto Rico and the United States. Changes in tax laws can have a
potentially adverse impact on the Corporations earnings.
Changes in domestic and international monetary and fiscal policies are beyond the Corporations
control and are difficult to predict.
Liquidity risk. Liquidity is essential to business and could be impaired by an inability to access
the capital markets or unforeseen outflows of cash. This situation may arise due to circumstances
that the Corporation may be unable to control, such as a general market disruption. The
Corporations credit ratings are important to its liquidity. A reduction in credit ratings could
adversely affect its liquidity and competitive position, increase borrowing costs, limit access to
the capital markets. For a further discussion of the Corporations liquidity, refer to Liquidity
Risk in the MD&A.
Operational risk. The Corporation is exposed to operational risk. In its daily operations, the
Corporation relies on the continued efficacy of its technical and telecommunication systems,
operational infrastructure, relationships with third parties and the vast array of associates and
key executives in its day to day and ongoing operations. Failure by any or all of these resources
subjects the Corporation to risks that may vary in size, scale and scope. This includes but is not
limited to operational or technical failures, ineffectiveness or exposure due to interruption in
third party support as expected, the risk of fraud or theft by employees or outsiders, unauthorized
transactions by employees or operational errors (including clerical or recordkeeping errors), as
well as, the loss of key individuals or failure on the part of the key individuals to perform
properly.
Reputational risk. The Corporation is subject to reputational risk, or the risk to earnings and
capital from negative public opinion. The Corporations ability to attract and retain customers and
employees could be adversely affected to the extent its reputation is damaged. The Corporations
failure to address, or to appear to fail to address various issues that could give rise to
reputational risk could cause harm to the Corporation and its business prospects and could lead to
litigation and regulatory action. These issues include, but are not limited to, appropriately
addressing potential conflicts of interest; legal and regulatory requirements; ethical issues;
money laundering ; privacy; properly maintaining customer and associated personal information;
record keeping; sales and trading practices; and the proper identification of the legal,
reputational, credit, liquidity, and market risks inherent in its products.
Merger risk. There are significant risks associated with mergers. Future business acquisitions
could be material to the Corporation and could require the issuance of additional capital or
incurring of debt. In that event, the Corporation could become more susceptible to economic
downturns and competitive pressures. Merger risk includes the possibility that projected growth
opportunities and cost savings fail to be realized, and that the integration process results in the
loss of key employees, or that the disruption of ongoing business from the merger could adversely
affect the Corporations ability to maintain relationships with customers.
Litigation risk. The volume of claims and the amount of damages and penalties claimed in
litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial institutions remains high. Substantial
legal liability or significant regulatory action against the Corporation could have material
adverse financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to the Corporation, which could
result in serious financial consequences.
Current Economic Condition of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Puerto Ricos economy continues
immersed on a prolonged and profound economic recession already in its fourth year of duration.
The weakness in the labor market persists with a loss of more than 39,000 jobs between January and
November of 2009 when compared to the same period in 2008. The unemployment rate continued to grow
as the rate of unemployed increased from 12.4% in November 2008 to 15.9% in November 2009. Total
investment in construction continued in negative territory as the development of new residential
projects remained halted due to an oversupply of housing units in the residential market. As of
September 2009, the sale of new housing units declined by 4,175 units or 53% to 3,718 units when
compared to the same period in 2008. Currently, the excess housing inventory is expected to last
for the next couple of years with much of the problem concentrating in the high-end segment of the
market. Other construction data as of October 2009 shows, for instance, that the value of
construction permits and cement sales declined 32.5% and 30.0% respectively when compared to
accumulated figures for the same period in
22
2008. On the other hand, sustained inflationary pressure and continuous employment layoffs have
seriously eroded consumer purchasing power and confidence level, leading to continue deterioration
in the commercial activity. As a result, retail sales adjusted for inflation weakened with total
sales declining 2.5% in the third quarter of 2009 when compared to the third quarter of 2008. As
these events unveil, the financial conditions of consumers and businesses deteriorated rapidly,
leading to 26.3% growth in total bankruptcies between 2008 and 2009 and to a rapid deterioration in
asset quality in Puerto Ricos financial system.
|
|
|
ITEM 1B. |
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation owned nineteen facilities, which consisted of eleven
branches and eight parking lots. The Corporation occupies one hundred twenty-two leased branch
premises, while warehouse space is rented in one location. In addition, office spaces are rented at
Torre Santander building in Hato Rey Puerto Rico, at the Santander Tower in Galeria San Patricio
building, in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, at Professional Office Park IV building, in Río Piedras, Puerto
Rico and at the Operational Center in Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. The Corporations management believes
that each of its facilities is well maintained and suitable for its purpose.
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Corporation is involved as plaintiff or defendant in a variety of routine litigation incidental
to the normal course of business. Management believes, based on the opinion of legal counsel, that
it has adequate defense with respect to such litigation and that any losses therefrom would not
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial
condition of the Corporation.
Management believes that there are no material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary
routine litigation incidental to the business, to which the Corporation or its subsidiary is a
party or of which any of their property is subject.
|
|
|
ITEM 4. |
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
None
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS |
Santander BanCorps Common Stock, $2.50 par value (the Common Stock), is traded on the New York
Stock Exchange (the NYSE) under the symbol SBP, and on the Madrid Stock Exchange (LATIBEX)
under the symbol XSBP, respectively. The table below sets forth, for the calendar quarters
indicated, the high and low sales prices on the NYSE during such periods.
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
Value |
|
Period |
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
per Share |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
$ |
13.49 |
|
|
$ |
5.74 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11.70 |
|
2nd Quarter |
|
|
8.13 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.99 |
|
3rd Quarter |
|
|
10.80 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.34 |
|
4th Quarter |
|
|
13.12 |
|
|
|
9.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
$ |
14.56 |
|
|
$ |
7.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
12.15 |
|
2nd Quarter |
|
|
15.00 |
|
|
|
9.23 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
12.03 |
|
3rd Quarter |
|
|
15.50 |
|
|
|
9.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.91 |
|
4th Quarter |
|
|
14.50 |
|
|
|
6.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.83 |
|
As of December 31, 2009 the approximate number of record holders of the Corporations Common Stock
was 110, which does not include beneficial owners whose shares are held in record names of brokers
and nominees. The last sales price for the Common Stock as quoted on the NYSE on such date was
$12.28 per share representing a market capitalization of $572.7 million as of December 31, 2009.
Dividend Policy and Dividends Paid
The payment of dividends by the Corporation will depend on the earnings, cash position and capital
needs of the Bank, its subsidiaries, general business conditions and other factors deemed relevant
by the Corporations Board of Directors. The ability of the Corporation to pay dividends may be
restricted also by various regulatory requirements and policies of regulatory agencies having
jurisdiction over the Corporation and the Bank.
Dividends on the Corporations common stock are payable when, as and if declared by the Board of
Directors of the Corporation, out of funds legally available therefore. The Corporation declared a
cash dividend of $0.20 per common share to all stockholders for a total payment of $9.3 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008 resulting in an annualized dividend yield of 1.6%. In light
of the continuing challenging general economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the global capital
markets, the Board of Directors of the Corporation voted during August 2008 to discontinue the
payment of the quarterly cash dividend on the Corporations common stock to strengthen the
institutions core capital position. The Corporation may use a portion of the funds previously paid
as dividends to reduce its outstanding debt. The Corporations decision is part of the significant
actions it has proactively taken in order to face the on-going challenges presented by the Puerto
Rico economy, which among others, include: selling the merchant business to an unrelated third
party; maintaining an on-going strict control on operating expenses; an efficiency plan driven to
lower its current efficiency ratio; and merging its mortgage banking and commercial banking
subsidiaries. While each of the Corporation and its banking subsidiary remain above well
capitalized ratios, this prudent measure will preserve and continue to reinforce the Corporations
capital position.
24
Stock Performance Graph
The graph below shows the cumulative stockholder return of the Common Stock of the Corporation
during the measurement period. The graph compares the return of the Common Stock of the Corporation
(identified by its official symbol as SBP) to the cumulative return of the Puerto Rico Stock
Index (PRSI) and the S&P Small Cap Commercial Bank Index (S6CBNK). The performance of the Common
Stock and the mentioned indexes are valued using a base value of 100. The Common Stock value as of
December 31, 2009 was $12.28. The Board of Directors of the Corporation acknowledges that the
market price of the Common Stock is influenced by numerous factors. The stock price shown in the
graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance. This stock performance graph should not
be deemed to be soliciting material under the proxy rules or incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, unless the Corporation specifically
states otherwise.
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following table presents selected consolidated and other financial and operating information
for the Corporation and subsidiaries and certain statistical information as of the dates and for
the periods indicated. This information should be read in conjunction with the Corporations
consolidated financial statements and the sections titled Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Selected Statistical Information appearing
elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations data as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 have been derived from the
Corporations consolidated audited financial statements.
25
Santander BanCorp and Subsidiaries
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per data share) |
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
482,158 |
|
|
$ |
600,771 |
|
|
$ |
674,210 |
|
|
$ |
618,320 |
|
|
$ |
439,605 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
130,431 |
|
|
|
244,449 |
|
|
|
362,531 |
|
|
|
327,714 |
|
|
|
212,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
351,727 |
|
|
|
356,322 |
|
|
|
311,679 |
|
|
|
290,606 |
|
|
|
227,022 |
|
Security gains |
|
|
9,251 |
|
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,842 |
|
Loss on extinghuishment of debt |
|
|
(9,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,959 |
) |
Broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees |
|
|
62,688 |
|
|
|
74,808 |
|
|
|
68,265 |
|
|
|
56,973 |
|
|
|
53,016 |
|
Other income |
|
|
60,107 |
|
|
|
67,873 |
|
|
|
78,590 |
|
|
|
61,496 |
|
|
|
60,459 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
269,067 |
|
|
|
324,627 |
|
|
|
344,016 |
|
|
|
277,783 |
|
|
|
221,386 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
152,496 |
|
|
|
175,523 |
|
|
|
147,824 |
|
|
|
65,583 |
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
Income tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
11,335 |
|
|
|
(6,524 |
) |
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
22,540 |
|
|
|
30,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
41,275 |
|
|
$ |
10,531 |
|
|
$ |
(36,245 |
) |
|
$ |
43,169 |
|
|
$ |
79,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER COMMON SHARE DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.78 |
) |
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
Book value |
|
$ |
12.78 |
|
|
$ |
11.83 |
|
|
$ |
11.50 |
|
|
$ |
12.42 |
|
|
$ |
12.19 |
|
Outstanding shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
End of period |
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
|
|
46,639,104 |
|
Cash Dividend per Share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
AVERAGE BALANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale and loans, net of allowance
for loan losses |
|
$ |
5,529,239 |
|
|
$ |
6,584,842 |
|
|
$ |
6,900,764 |
|
|
$ |
6,439,205 |
|
|
$ |
5,871,433 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
191,738 |
|
|
|
175,100 |
|
|
|
125,897 |
|
|
|
87,465 |
|
|
|
67,956 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
6,375,311 |
|
|
|
8,014,368 |
|
|
|
8,530,213 |
|
|
|
8,262,748 |
|
|
|
7,882,180 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
7,112,754 |
|
|
|
8,740,670 |
|
|
|
9,199,712 |
|
|
|
8,820,630 |
|
|
|
8,285,992 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
4,645,829 |
|
|
|
5,558,667 |
|
|
|
5,221,999 |
|
|
|
5,054,687 |
|
|
|
5,082,520 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
1,565,983 |
|
|
|
2,314,535 |
|
|
|
3,093,947 |
|
|
|
2,876,720 |
|
|
|
2,415,172 |
|
Common equity |
|
|
569,700 |
|
|
|
564,238 |
|
|
|
573,536 |
|
|
|
563,593 |
|
|
|
576,226 |
|
PERIOD END BALANCES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale and loans, net of allowance
for loan losses |
|
$ |
5,273,170 |
|
|
$ |
5,967,958 |
|
|
$ |
6,911,380 |
|
|
$ |
6,836,693 |
|
|
$ |
5,954,890 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
197,303 |
|
|
|
191,889 |
|
|
|
166,952 |
|
|
|
106,863 |
|
|
|
66,842 |
|
Earning assets |
|
|
6,124,895 |
|
|
|
7,186,973 |
|
|
|
8,519,773 |
|
|
|
8,598,703 |
|
|
|
7,933,139 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
6,766,436 |
|
|
|
7,897,576 |
|
|
|
9,160,213 |
|
|
|
9,188,168 |
|
|
|
8,271,948 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
4,395,560 |
|
|
|
5,014,902 |
|
|
|
5,160,703 |
|
|
|
5,313,974 |
|
|
|
5,224,650 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
1,506,754 |
|
|
|
1,939,384 |
|
|
|
3,138,730 |
|
|
|
2,954,515 |
|
|
|
2,212,245 |
|
Common equity |
|
|
595,897 |
|
|
|
551,636 |
|
|
|
536,536 |
|
|
|
579,220 |
|
|
|
568,527 |
|
Continued on the following page
26
Continued from the previous page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
SELECTED RATIOS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (1) |
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
3.63 |
% |
|
|
3.02 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (2) |
|
|
56.77 |
% |
|
|
60.39 |
% |
|
|
66.32 |
% |
|
|
66.82 |
% |
|
|
62.97 |
% |
Return on average total assets |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
(0.39 |
)% |
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
Return on average common equity |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
(6.32 |
)% |
|
|
7.66 |
% |
|
|
13.85 |
% |
Dividend payout |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
86.96 |
% |
|
|
(82.05 |
)% |
|
|
68.82 |
% |
|
|
37.43 |
% |
Average net loans/average total deposits |
|
|
119.02 |
% |
|
|
118.46 |
% |
|
|
132.15 |
% |
|
|
127.39 |
% |
|
|
115.52 |
% |
Average earning assets/average total assets |
|
|
89.63 |
% |
|
|
91.69 |
% |
|
|
92.76 |
% |
|
|
93.68 |
% |
|
|
95.13 |
% |
Average stockholders equity/average assets |
|
|
8.01 |
% |
|
|
6.46 |
% |
|
|
6.24 |
% |
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
|
6.95 |
% |
Fee income to average assets |
|
|
1.44 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
|
1.26 |
% |
|
|
1.20 |
% |
|
|
1.15 |
% |
Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to risk-adjusted assets |
|
|
10.60 |
% |
|
|
8.41 |
% |
|
|
7.42 |
% |
|
|
7.87 |
% |
|
|
9.09 |
% |
Total capital to risk-adjusted assets |
|
|
15.55 |
% |
|
|
12.83 |
% |
|
|
10.55 |
% |
|
|
10.93 |
% |
|
|
12.30 |
% |
Leverage Ratio |
|
|
7.98 |
% |
|
|
6.10 |
% |
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
5.81 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
Asset quality: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
2.23 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.11 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans |
|
|
68.07 |
% |
|
|
90.21 |
% |
|
|
56.70 |
% |
|
|
100.01 |
% |
|
|
90.72 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing
loans plus accruing loans past-due 90 days or more |
|
|
65.54 |
% |
|
|
84.84 |
% |
|
|
55.36 |
% |
|
|
83.62 |
% |
|
|
87.17 |
% |
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
0.92 |
% |
Recoveries to charge-offs |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
2.52 |
% |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
9.30 |
% |
|
|
18.28 |
% |
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding interest on deposits |
|
|
1.94 |
x |
|
|
1.04 |
x |
|
|
0.82 |
x |
|
|
1.42 |
x |
|
|
2.19 |
x |
Including interest on deposits |
|
|
1.39 |
x |
|
|
1.02 |
x |
|
|
0.91 |
x |
|
|
1.20 |
x |
|
|
1.51 |
x |
OTHER DATA AT END OF PERIOD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer financial assets under management |
|
$ |
13,501,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,413,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,263,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,154,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,960,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Full services branches |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Consumer retail branches |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total branches |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
ATMs |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On a tax equivalent basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Operating expenses less provision for claim receivable in 2008 and intangibles impairment
charges in 2007 divided by net interest income on a tax equivalent basis, plus other income
excluding securities gains and losses, gain on equity securities, gain on sale of POS and Trust
division in 2007, gain on sale of FDIC assessment credits and gain on tax credit purchased in
2006, loss on early termination on repurchase agreements.. |
27
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Description of the Business
Santander BanCorp and subsidiaries is a diversified financial holding company headquartered in San
Juan, Puerto Rico, offering a full range of financial products and services to consumers and
commercial customers through its subsidiaries. The Corporations subsidiaries are engaged in the
following businesses:
|
|
Commercial Banking Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking Banco Santander Puerto Rico (Santander Mortgage Corporation during 2007
and prior, which was merged into the Bank at January 1, 2008) |
|
|
|
Securities Brokerage and Investment Banking Santander Securities Corporation |
|
|
|
Asset Management Santander Asset Management Corporation |
|
|
|
Consumer Finance Santander Financial Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
Insurance Santander Insurance Agency, Inc. and Island Insurance Corporation |
|
|
|
International Banking Santander International Bank of Puerto Rico, Inc. |
Basis of Presentation
The Corporations financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and with general practices within the financial
services industry, which are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. In
preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Accounting policies that
are critical to the overall financial statements are fully described in the Critical Accounting
Policies section below.
Forward-Looking Statements
This discussion of financial results contains forward-looking statements about the Corporation.
Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to
historical or current facts. They often include words or phrases like would be, will allow,
intends to, will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated,
estimate, project, believe, or similar expressions and are intended to identify forward
looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The future results of the Corporation could be affected by subsequent events and could differ
materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. If future events and actual
performance differ from the Corporations assumptions, the actual results could vary significantly
from the performance projected in the forward-looking statements. The Corporation wishes to caution
readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of
the date made, and to advise readers that various factors, including regional and national
conditions, substantial changes in levels of market interest rates, credit and other risks of
lending and investment activities, competitive and regulatory factors and legislative changes,
could affect the Corporations financial performance and could cause the Corporations actual
results for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected. The
Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after
the date of such statements.
Overview of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This overview of managements discussion and analysis highlights selected information in this
document and may not contain all of the information that is important to the reader. For a more
complete understanding of trends, events, commitments, uncertainties, liquidity, capital resources
and critical accounting estimates, you should carefully read this entire document. All
accompanying tables, financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report should be
considered an integral part of this analysis.
The Corporation, similarly to other financial institutions, is subject to certain risks, many of
which are beyond managements control, though efforts and initiatives are undertaken to manage
those risks in conjunction with return optimization. Among the risks being managed are: (1) market
risk, which is the risk that changes in market rates and prices will adversely affect the
28
Corporations financial condition or results of operations, (2) liquidity risk, which is the risk
that the Corporation will have insufficient cash or access to cash to meet operating needs and
financial obligations, (3) credit risk, which is the risk that loan customers or other
counterparties will be unable to perform their contractual obligations, and (4) operational risk,
which is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and
systems, or from external events. In addition, the Corporation is subject to legal, compliance and
reputational risks, among others.
As a provider of financial services, the Corporations earnings are significantly affected by
general economic and business conditions. Credit, funding, including deposit origination and fee
income generation activities are influenced by the level of business spending and investment,
consumer income, spending and savings, capital market activities, competition, customer
preferences, interest rate conditions and prevailing market rates on competing products. The
Corporation constantly monitors general business and economic conditions, industry-related trends
and indicators, competition from traditional and non-traditional financial services providers,
interest rate volatility, indicators of credit quality, demand for loans and deposits, operational
efficiencies, including systems, revenue and profitability improvement and regulatory changes in
the financial services industry, among others. The Corporation operates in a highly regulated
environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and local laws and regulations.
Also, competition with other financial services providers could adversely affect the Corporations
profitability.
Overview of Financial Results
The Corporation reported a significant increase in net income of $30.7 million or 291.9% to reach
$41.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 over the net income of $10.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The Corporation reported $0.88 and $0.23 earning per share for the
year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in net income was principally due
to decreases of $55.6 million and $23.0 million in operating expenses and provision for loans
losses, respectively, partially offset by $25.4 million decrease in other income and $17.9 million
increase in provision for income tax.
Return on
average assets (ROA) of 0.58% and return on average common equity (ROE) of 7.25%
reflected improvements of 46 basis points and 538 basis points, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.
The efficiency ratio (on a tax-equivalent basis) also reflected an improvement of 362 basis points
to reach 56.77% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 60.39% for 2008.
The Corporations financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009 were impacted by the
following:
|
|
|
The net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was 5.56%, a 106 basis points of
improvement over 4.50% for the year ended December 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan losses decreased $23.0 million or 13.1% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The provision for loan losses
represented 103.7% of the net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2009 versus
116.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008; |
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses of $197.3 million as of December 31, 2009 represented
3.61% of total loans, 68.07% of non-performing loans and 230.74% of non-performing loans
excluding loans secured by real estate. As of December
31, 2008, the allowance for loan losses was $191.9 million, represented 3.12% of total
loans, 90.21% of non-performing loans and 225.06% of non-performing loans excluding loans
secured by real estate; |
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income decreased $25.4 million or 17.2% for the year ended December 31,
2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. Non-interest income was impacted principally
by: |
|
(i) |
|
a gain of $9.3 million on investment securities available for sale
partially offset by a loss of $9.6 million on the early termination of a repurchase
agreement, compared with a gain of $5.2 million for the same period in the prior
year; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a decrease in broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees of $12.1
million; |
29
|
(iii) |
|
a gain of $3.3 million on the sale of a portion of the Corporations
investment in Visa, Inc. during the third quarter of 2009 compared with a gain of
$8.6 million during the first quarter 2008 in connection with Visas initial public
offering; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
a loss of $7.3 million on derivatives and other financial instruments
compared with a gain of $3.3 million for the same period in prior year, |
|
|
(v) |
|
an unfavorable valuation adjustment of $7.4 million for loans held for sale
recorded during 2008. |
|
|
|
Operating expenses reflected a decrease of $55.6 million or 17.1% when with the figures
reported in 2008. This decrease was affected principally by: |
|
(i) |
|
$24.8 million decrease in salaries and other employee benefits partially
offset by increases of $4.5 million in incentive stock plan expense and a decrease of
$2.3 million in expense from loan origination cost being deferred; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a provision for claim receivable of $25.1 million from Lehman Brother Inc
(LBI) recognized during the third quarter of 2008; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
decreases of $7.5 million in professional fees, $2.8 million in business
promotion, $2.4 million in occupancy cost, $2.1 in insurance expense and $1.2 million
in EDP and technical services and amortization |
|
|
(iv) |
|
partially offset by $6.6 million increase in FDIC assessment due to the
assessment systems implemented under the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005
including the emergency special assessment recognized on September 30, 2009. |
|
|
|
During 2009, the Corporation sold certain loans, including some classified as impaired,
to an affiliate for $142.0 million in cash. These loans had a net book value of $142.0
million comprised of an outstanding principal balance of $149.2 million and a specific
valuation allowance of $7.2 million. The type of loans by net book value was $65.5 million
in construction loans, $61.2 million in commercial loans and $15.3 million in mortgage
loans. No gain or loss was recognized on these transactions |
The Corporations principal source of revenues is net interest income, which is the difference
between the interest earned on loans and investments and the interest paid on customer deposits and
other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income represents approximately 74.2% and 70.7% of
the Corporations total net revenues (defined as net interest income plus other income) for 2009
and 2008, respectively. Net interest income is affected by the relative amounts of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the interest rates earned or paid on
these balances.
Lending activities are one of the most important aspects of the Corporations operations. The
economic environment and uncertainties in Puerto Rico caused reduced lending activity and impacted
the quality of the Corporations loan portfolio
increasing the delinquency rates and charge offs. The net loan portfolio, including loans held for
sale, decreased $0.7 billion, or 11.6% reaching $5.3 billion at December 31, 2009, compared to $6.0
billion at December 31, 2008. As of December 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses reached $197.3
million, $5.4 million or 2.8% increase. The allowance for loan losses comprised $133.9 million
related to the commercial banking portfolio and $63.4 million related to the consumer finance
portfolio. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans increased to 49 basis points to
3.61% at December 31, 2009 from 3.12% at December 31, 2008.
Although the Corporation has diversified its sources of revenue, interest income from the loan
portfolio continues to account for the majority of total revenues, representing 76.1% and 73.2% of
total gross revenues for 2009 and 2008, respectively. As a result, the primary influence on the
Corporations operating results is the demand for loans in Puerto Rico, which is significantly
affected by economic conditions, competition, the demand and supply of housing, the fiscal policies
of the federal and Puerto Rico governments and interest rate levels. Changes in interest rates, the
Corporations principal market risk, can significantly impact its results of operations by
affecting net interest income and the gains or losses realized on the sale of loans
30
and securities.
As described under Risk Management, the Corporation uses derivative instruments to hedge, to a
limited extent, its interest rate risk in order to protect its net interest income under different
interest rate scenarios.
Broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees accounted for 51.2% and 50.6% of the
Corporations other income and 10.4% and 10.0% of its total revenues for 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The Corporation also earns revenues from other sources that are not as dependent on
interest levels, such as bank service fees on deposit accounts and credit card fees. Other income,
including broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees, accounted for 20.3% and 19.8% of
total revenues for 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Deposits at December 31, 2009 were $4.4 billion, reflecting a decrease of $619.3 million or 12.4%
compared to deposits of $5.0 billion as of December 31, 2008.
Total borrowings at December 31, 2009 (comprised of federal funds purchased and other borrowings,
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances, commercial paper issued, term and capital notes)
reflected a decrease of $432.6 million or 22.3% to $1.5 billion at December 31, 2009 compared with
$1.9 billion at December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had $13.5 billion and $13.4 billion in customer
financial assets under management, respectively. This is a significant part of the financial assets
of Puerto Rico households and reflects the Corporations strong positioning in its primary market.
Customer financial assets under management include bank deposits (excluding brokered deposits),
broker-dealer customer accounts, mutual fund assets managed, and trust, institutional and private
accounts under management.
SBP common stock price per share was $12.28 as of December 31, 2009 resulting in a market
capitalization of $0.6 billion (including affiliated holdings).
During
2009, Santander BanCorp did not declared nor paid dividends per common share to its
shareholders of record.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements of Santander BanCorp are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with general practices
within the financial services industry. In preparing the consolidated financial statements,
management is required to make judgments, involving significant estimates and assumptions, in the
application of its accounting policies about matters that are inherently uncertain. Management
arrives at these estimates and assumptions, which may materially affect the reported amounts of
certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, considering the facts and circumstances at a
specific point in time. Changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that
differ from those estimates. Detailed below is a discussion of the Corporations critical
accounting policies. These policies are critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective
or complex judgments, assumptions and estimates. For a complete discussion of the Corporations
significant and critical accounting policies refer to the notes to the consolidated financial
statements and the discussion throughout this document which should be read in conjunction with
this section.
Current Accounting Developments
The Corporations consolidated financial statements provide a complete discussion of the recently
issued accounting pronouncements adopted by the Corporation. Refer to Note 1 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The Corporation assesses the overall risks in its loan portfolio and
establishes and maintains an allowance for probable losses thereon. The allowance for loan losses
is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for estimated loan losses based on the evaluation of
known and inherent risks in the Corporations loan portfolio. The Corporations management
evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a monthly basis.
The determination of the allowance for loan losses is one of the most complex and critical
accounting estimates the Corporations management makes. The allowance for loan losses is composed
of three different components. An asset-specific reserve based on the provisions of accounting
standard FASB ASC Topic 310 Receivables, an expected loss estimate based on the
provisions of FASB ASC Topic 450 Contingencies, and an unallocated reserve based on the effect of
probable economic deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the asset-specific component
of the allowance.
Commercial, construction loans and certain mortgage loans exceeding a predetermined monetary
threshold are identified for evaluation of impairment on an
individual basis pursuant FASB ASC Topic 310. The Corporation considers a loan
31
impaired when interest and/or principal is
past due 90 days or more, or, when based on current information and events it is probable that the
Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the
loan agreement. The asset-specific reserve on each individual loan identified as impaired is
measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans
effective interest rate, except as a practical expedient, the Corporation may measure impairment
based on the loans observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, net of estimated
disposal costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. Most of the asset-specific reserves of the
Corporations impaired loans are measured on the basis of the fair value of the collateral. The
fair value of the collateral is determined by external valuation specialists and since these values
cannot be observed or corroborated with market data, they are classified as Level 3 and presented
as part of non-recurring measurement disclosures. The Corporation
requests updated appraisal reports for loans that are considered
impaired, either annually or every two years depending on the total
exposure of the borrower and the type of loan. As a general
procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part of
the underwriting and approval process and also for credits
considered impaired.
A reserve for expected losses is determined under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 450 for all
loans not evaluated individually for impairment. Effective July 1, 2009, the Corporation revised
its quantitative methodology for estimating the allowance for loan losses for the consumer and
consumer finance portfolios. Through the end of the second quarter ended June 30, 2009, the
Corporations quantitative methodology for estimating the allowance for loan losses for the
consumer and consumer finance portfolios was based on a historical loss rate analysis, which relied
on historical loss experience over a defined period for pools of loans with common characteristics.
The revised quantitative methodology is based on a migration analysis/roll rate and considers both
historical loss rates and loss rates based on the likelihood of credit deterioration (expectation
of current loans becoming delinquent in monthly increments until they default and are charged-off).
The loss factor estimated based on this methodology may be adjusted to incorporate seasonality
attributes as well as to reflect recent economic or business trends that may affect the
collectability of the portfolio. The loss factor is then applied to the outstanding portfolio at
period end to estimate the amount of expected charge offs and the provision for loan losses
required to support an adequate allowance for loan losses. The Corporations decision to revise
and improve its methodology was made after a thorough evaluation of the reliability of the revised
methodology including a back testing analysis. Management believes that the revised quantitative
methodology provides a more reliable estimate of probable losses on its existing consumer and
consumer finance portfolios.
An additional, or unallocated, reserve is maintained to cover the effect of probable economic
deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the asset-specific component of the allowance.
This component represents managements view that given the complexities of the lending portfolio
and the assessment process, including the inherent imprecision in the financial models used in the
loss forecasting process, there are estimable losses that have been incurred but not yet
specifically identified, and as a result not fully provided for in the asset-specific component of
the allowance. The level of the unallocated reserve may change periodically after evaluating
factors impacting assumptions used in the calculation of the asset specific component of the
reserve.
The underlying assumptions, estimates and assessments used by management to determine the
components of the allowance for loan losses are periodically evaluated and updated to reflect
managements current view of overall economic conditions and other relevant factors impacting
credit quality and inherent losses. Changes in such estimates could significantly impact the
allowance and provision for loan losses. The Corporation could experience loan losses that are
different from the current estimates made by management. Based on current and expected economic
conditions, the expected level of net loan losses and the methodology established to evaluate the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers that the Corporation has
established an adequate position in its allowance for loan losses. Refer to the Non-performing
Assets and Past Due Loans section for further information.
Transfers of Financial Assets. The Corporation occasionally engages in transfers of financial
assets and accounts for them in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 860, Transfer and
Servicing. This Topic provides that a transfer of financial assets in which the transferor
surrenders control over those financial assets shall be accounted for as a sale to the
extent that consideration other than beneficial interests in the transferred assets is received in
exchange. A transferor has surrendered control if all of the following conditions are met: (a) the
transferred assets have been isolated from the transferorput presumptively beyond the reach of
creditors, even in bankruptcy; (b) each transferee has the right to pledge or exchange the assets
it received and no condition constrains the transferee from taking advantage of its right to pledge
or exchange; and (c) the transferor does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets
through either (i) an agreement that both entitles and obligates the transferor to repurchase or
redeem them before their maturity or (ii) the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return
specified assets, other than through a cleanup call. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 860, a gain
or loss on the sale is recognized based on the carrying amount of the financial assets involved in
the transfer, allocated between the assets transferred and the retained interests based on their
relative fair value at the date of transfer. When the Corporation transfers financial assets and
the transfer fails any one of the FASB ASC Topic 860 sales criteria, the Corporation is not
permitted to derecognize the transferred financial assets and the transaction is accounted for as a
secured borrowing.
Income taxes. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation is required to
estimate income taxes. This involves an estimation of current income tax expense together with an
assessment of temporary differences resulting from
32
differences between the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax
purposes. The determination of current income tax expense involves estimates and assumptions that
require the Corporation to assume certain positions based on its interpretation of current tax
regulations. The Corporation accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with FASB ASC Topic
740, Income Tax. Accordingly, the Corporation reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits
resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The
Corporation recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in
income tax expense. Changes in assumptions affecting estimates may be required in the future and
estimated tax liabilities may need to be increased or decreased accordingly. The accrual for
uncertain tax positions is adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the
progress of tax audits, case law and emerging legislation. The Corporations effective tax rate
includes the impact of tax contingency accruals and changes to such accruals, including related
interest and penalties, as considered appropriate by management. When particular matters arise, a
number of years may elapse before such matters are audited by the taxing authorities and finally
resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters or the expiration of the statute of limitations may
result in the release of uncertain tax positions, which are recognized as a reduction to the
Corporations effective rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable settlement of any particular
issue could increase the effective rate and may require the use of cash in the year of resolution.
The determination of deferred tax expense or benefit is based on changes in the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities that generate temporary differences. The carrying value of the Corporations
net deferred tax assets assumes that the Corporation will be able to generate sufficient future
taxable income based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and related assumptions
change, the Corporation may be required to record valuation allowances against its deferred tax
assets resulting in additional income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Management evaluates its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and assesses the need for a
valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is established when management believes that it is more
likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in
valuation allowance from period to period are included in the Corporations tax provision in the
period of change. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future
taxable income, management believes it is more likely than not, the Corporation will not realize
the benefits of the deferred tax assets related to Santander Financial Services, Inc and Santander
Bancorp (parent company only) amounting to $14.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2009
and $20.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2008.
Accordingly, deferred tax asset valuation allowances of $14.5 million and $0.1
million
at December 31, 2009 and $20.6 million and $0.1 million at December 31, 2008,
for Santander Financial Services, Inc and Santander Bancorp (parent company only),
respectively, were recorded.
The Corporation accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740.
Accordingly, the Corporation reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Corporation recognizes
interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Goodwill and other intangible assets. The Corporation accounts for goodwill in accordance with
FASB ASC Topic 350 Intangible-Goodwill and Others. The reporting units are tested at least
annually to determine whether their carrying value exceeds their fair market value. Should this be
the case, the value of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangibles may be impaired and written down.
Goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets are also tested for impairment on an interim
basis if an event occurs or circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than
not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. If there is a
determination that the fair value of the goodwill or other identifiable intangible asset is less
than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference.
Impairment losses, if any, are reflected in other operating expenses in the consolidated statement
of operations.
Tangible and intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful
lives. Useful lives are based on managements estimates of the period that the assets will generate
revenue. If circumstances and conditions indicate
deterioration in the value of tangible assets and intangible assets with finite useful lives, the
book value would be adjusted and a loss would be recognized in current operations.
The Corporation uses judgment in assessing goodwill and intangible assets for impairment.
Estimates of fair value are based on projections of revenues, operating costs and cash flows of
each reporting unit considering historical and anticipated future results, general economic and
market conditions as well as the impact of planned business or operational strategies. The
valuations employ a combination of present value techniques to measure fair value and consider
market factors. Generally, the Corporation engages third party specialists to assist with its
valuations. Additionally, judgment is used in determining the useful lives of finite-lived
intangible assets. Changes in judgments and projections could result in a significantly different
estimate of the fair value of the reporting units and could result in an impairment of goodwill.
As a result of the purchase price allocations from prior acquisitions and the Corporations
decentralized structure, goodwill is included in multiple reporting units. Due to certain factors
such as the highly competitive environment, cyclical nature of the business in some of the
reporting units, general economic and market conditions as well as planned business or operational
33
strategies, among others, the profitability of the Corporations individual reporting units may
periodically suffer from downturns in these factors. These factors may have a relatively more
pronounced impact on the individual reporting units as compared to the Corporation as a whole and
might adversely affect the fair value of the reporting units. If material adverse conditions occur
that impact the Corporations reporting units, the Corporations reporting units, and the related
goodwill would need to be written down to an amount considered recoverable.
The Corporations goodwill consists of $10.5 million that resulted from the acquisition by the Bank
of Banco Central Hispano Puerto Rico, $24.3 million that resulted from the acquisition by Santander
Securities of Merrill Lynchs retail brokerage business in Puerto Rico and $86.7 million that
resulted from the acquisition of Island Finance.
The value of the goodwill is supported ultimately by revenue from the commercial banking segment,
the wealth management segment and the consumer finance segment. A decline in earnings as a result
of a lack of growth, or our inability to deliver cost effective services over sustained periods,
could lead to a perceived impairment of goodwill, which would be evaluated and, if necessary be
recorded as a write-down in the consolidated statement of operations.
On an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances dictate, management reviews goodwill and
evaluates events or other developments that may indicate impairment in the carrying amount. The
evaluation for potential impairment is inherently complex, and involves significant judgment in the
use of estimates and assumptions.
To determine the fair value of the reporting units being evaluated for goodwill impairment, the
Corporation uses the assistance of an independent consultant. The determination of the fair value
of the reporting units (acquired segments) involves the use of estimates and assumptions including
expected results of operations, an assumed discount rate and an assumed growth rate for the
reporting units. Specifically, the independent valuation specialist prepared analyses regarding the
fair value of equity of the Corporations reporting units, Commercial Banking, Wealth Management
and Consumer Finance. The consultant may use up to three separate valuation approaches:
Market Multiple Approach: provides indications of value based upon comparisons of
the reporting unit to market values and pricing evidence of public companies in the
same or similar lines of businesses. Market ratios (pricing multiples) and
performance fundamentals relating the public companies stock prices (equity) or
enterprise values to certain underlying fundamental data are applied to the
reporting unit to determine indications of its fair value.
Comparable Transaction Approach: includes an examination of recent transactions in
which companies involved in the same or similar lines of business to the reporting
unit were acquired. Acquisition values and pricing evidence are used in much the
same manner as the Market Multiple Approach for indication of the reporting units
fair value.
Discounted Cash Flow Approach: calculates the present value of the projected future
cash flows to be generated by the reporting unit using appropriate discount rates.
The discount rates are intended to reflect all associated risks of realizing the
projected future cash flows. Terminal values are computed as of the end of the last
period for which cash flows are projected to determine an estimate of the values of
the reporting unit as of that future point in time. Discounting the terminal values
back to the present and adding the present values of the future cash flows yields
indications of the reporting units fair value.
Events that may indicate goodwill impairment include significant or adverse changes in the
business, economic or political climate; unanticipated competition; adverse action or assessment by
a regulator; plans for disposition of a segment; among others.
In assessing the recoverability of goodwill and other intangibles, the Corporation must make
assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of
the respective assets. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, the
Corporation may be required to record impairment charges for these assets not previously recorded.
The key assumptions used by management to determine the fair value of the reporting units include
company specific risk elements that are consistent with the risks inherent in its current business
models for each reporting unit. Changes in judgment and estimates could result in a significantly
different estimate of the fair value of the reporting units and could result in an impairment of
goodwill and other intangibles.
Pension and Other Postemployment Benefits. The determination of the Corporations obligation and
expense for pension and other postretirement benefits is dependent on the selection of certain
assumptions used by actuaries in calculating such amounts. Those assumptions are described in Note
19 to the consolidated financial statements and include, among others, the discount rate, expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets and rates of increase in healthcare costs. Management
34
participates in the determination of these factors, which normally undergo evaluation against
industry assumptions, among other factors. In accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, actual results that differ from the Corporations
assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and therefore, generally affect
recognized expense and recorded obligation in such future periods. The Corporation uses an
independent actuarial firm for the determination of the pension and post-retirement benefit costs
and obligations.
The FASB ASC Topic 715, Compensation Retirement Benfits requires recognition of a plans
over-funded or under-funded status as an asset or liability with an offsetting adjustment to
accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). Actuarial gains or losses, prior service costs and
transition assets or obligations will be subsequently recognized as components of net periodic
benefit costs. Additional minimum pension liabilities (AMPL) and related intangible assets are
derecognized upon adoption of the standard.
In developing the expected return on plan assets, the Corporation considers the asset allocation,
historical returns on the types of assets held in the pension trust, the current economic
environment, as well as input from the actuaries, financial analysts and the Corporations
long-term inflation assumptions and interest rate scenarios. The expected rate of return for plan
assets was set at 7.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and 8.5% for the year ended
December 31, 2007. In selecting a discount rate, the Corporation considers the long-term corporate
bond yield as a guide. At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the discount rate was 5.91%, 6.00% and
6.50%, respectively, for the Corporations Plan and 5.80%, 6.00% and 5.75%, respectively, for the
Banco Central Hispano (BCH)s Plan.
Management believes that the assumptions made are appropriate; however, significant differences in
actual experience or significant changes in assumptions may materially affect pension obligations
and future expense.
Fair Value Measurement. Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted FASB ASC Topic 820, for
all financial instruments accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis. Adoption of FASB ASC
Topic 820 did not have a material effect on the Corporations financial position and results of
operations. Illiquidity in the credit markets contributed to the amount of our reported Level 3
instruments, primarily in our trading and loan portfolios. In conjunction with the adoption FASB
ASC Topic 820, effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted FASB ASC Topic 825 which provides
an option for most financial assets and liabilities to be reported at fair value on an
instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. The election is
made at the initial adoption, at the acquisition of a financial asset, financial liability or a
firm commitment and it may not be revoked. Under the FASB ASC Topic 825 transition provisions, the
Corporation has elected to report certain callable brokered certificates of deposits and
subordinated notes at fair value with future changes in value reported in earnings. FASB ASC Topic
825 provides an opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings as well as reducing the
burden associated with complex hedge accounting requirements.
The Corporations estimates of fair value for financial instruments are based on the framework
established in FASB ASC Topic 820. The fair value of a financial instrument is the estimated
amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in an orderly transaction between knowledgeable,
unrelated willing parties, i.e., not in a forced transaction. The disclosure of fair value
estimates in the FASB ASC Topic 820 hierarchy is based on whether the significant inputs into the
valuation are observable. In determining such estimates and the level of the hierarchy in which
the estimate is disclosed, the highest priority is given to unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets, the lowest priority to unobservable inputs that reflect the Corporations market
assumptions. FASB ASC Topic 820 requires the use of observable inputs when available.
Additionally, the level at which a financial instrument is reported is based on the lowest level of
any significant input into the estimation of fair value. The three levels of the hierarchy are as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets that the Corporation has the ability to access. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; or valuations
based on models where the significant inputs are observable (e.g., interest rates, yield
curves, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities, etc.) or can be corroborated by
observable market data. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 - Valuations based on models where significant inputs are not observable. The
unobservable inputs reflect the Corporations own assumptions about the assumptions that
market participants would use. |
The Corporation uses quoted market prices, when available, to determine estimates of fair value and
includes these prices in the amounts disclosed in Level 1 of the hierarchy. When quoted market
prices are unavailable, the Corporation obtains fair value
35
estimates from a nationally recognized
pricing service that determines fair value estimates based on objectively verifiable information:
relevant market information, relevant credit information, perceived market movements and sector
news. The market inputs utilized in the pricing evaluation, listed in the approximate order of
priority, include: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads,
two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, reference data, and industry and economic
events. Depending on the security, the priority of the use of inputs may change or some market
inputs may not be relevant. For some securities additional inputs may be necessary. The
Corporation reviews the estimates of fair value provided by the pricing service and compares the
estimates to the Corporations knowledge of the market to determine if the estimates obtained are
representative of the prices in the market. The Corporation will challenge any prices deemed not
to be representative of fair value. The fair value estimates provided from this pricing service are
included in the amount disclosed in Level 2 of the hierarchy.
If quoted market prices and an estimate from a pricing service are unavailable, the Corporation
produces an estimate of fair value based on internally developed valuation techniques, which,
depending on the level of observable market inputs, will render the fair value estimate as Level 2
or Level 3. See Note 24 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further
information related to valuation methods used by the Corporation for each type of financial
instruments that are carried at fair value.
The Corporation employs control processes to validate the fair value of its financial instruments.
These control processes are designed to assure that the values used for financial reporting are
based on observable inputs wherever possible. In the event that observable inputs are not
available, the control processes are designed to assure that the valuation approach utilized is
appropriate and consistently applied, and the assumptions are reasonable. These control processes
include validation and corroboration procedures over the quotes and prices obtained from brokers
and counterparties, as well as reviews of the pricing models appropriateness by the personnel with
relevant expertise, which are independent from the trading desks on a quarterly basis. In addition,
the Corporation is considering recently executed comparable transaction and other observable market
data for purposes of validating assumptions used in the models.
The Corporation understands that any increases and/or decreases in the aggregate fair value of its
assets and liabilities will not materially affect its liquidity and capital resources.
Results of Operations
The following financial discussion is based upon and should be read in conjunction with the
Corporations consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and
2007.
The following table sets forth the principal components of the Corporations net income (loss) for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and other selected financial information.
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Components of net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
$ |
351,727 |
|
|
$ |
356,322 |
|
|
$ |
311,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
(152,496 |
) |
|
|
(175,523 |
) |
|
|
(147,824 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
122,446 |
|
|
|
147,835 |
|
|
|
148,120 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(269,067 |
) |
|
|
(324,627 |
) |
|
|
(344,016 |
) |
Provision
(benefit) for income tax |
|
|
11,335 |
|
|
|
(6,524 |
) |
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
41,275 |
|
|
$ |
10,531 |
|
|
$ |
(36,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other selected financial information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.78 |
) |
ROA |
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
(0.39 |
)% |
ROE |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
1.87 |
% |
|
|
(6.32 |
)% |
Net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis |
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
3.74 |
% |
Efficiency Ratio (*) |
|
|
56.77 |
% |
|
|
60.39 |
% |
|
|
66.32 |
% |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Operating expenses less provision for claim receivable in 2008 and intangibles impairment
charges in 2007 divided by net interest income on a tax equivalent basis plus other income
excluding securities gain and losses, gain on equity securities, gain on sale of POS and Trust
division in 2007 and loss on early termination on repurchase agreements. |
2009 compared to 2008. The Corporations net income increased $30.7 million or 291.9% for the
year ended December 31, 2009 compared to figures reported in 2008. This increase was mainly due to
reductions of $55.6 million or 17.1% in other operating expense and $23.0 million or 13.1% in
provision for loan losses. These decreases were partially offset by a $25.4 million or 17.2%
decrease in other income and $17.9 million or 273.5% increase in provision for income tax. The
decrease in operating expenses was principally due to a provision for claim receivable of $25.1
million recognized during the third quarter of 2008 which represent the excess of the value of the
securities held by LBI over the amount owned by the Corporation under the securities sold under
agreement to repurchase, $18.1 million decrease in salaries and other employee benefits and $12.4
million decrease in other operating expenses. The $25.4 million decrease in other income was mainly
due to a decrease of $10.6 million in loss on derivatives and
other financial instrument at fair value and a
decrease of $12.2 million in broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees.
2008 compared to 2007. The Corporations net income increased $46.8 million or 129.1% for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to figures reported in 2007. This increase was mainly due to an
increase of $44.6 million or 14.3% in other net interest income, a decrease in other operating
expenses of $19.4 million or 5.6% and a decrease in provision for income tax of $10.7 million or
255.2%. These increases were offset by an increase the provision for loan losses of $27.7 million
or 18.7%. The increase in net interest income was due to an improvement of 76 basis points in net
interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis. The decrease in operating expenses was principally due
to a $43.3 million related to goodwill and other intangible assets impairment charges recognized
during 2007, a $16.0 million decrease in stock incentive compensation expense sponsored by
Santander Group, a provision for claim receivable of $25.1 million recognized during 2008, a $7.8
million increase in professional fees, a $6.9 million increase in salaries and other personnel
expenses, a $3.9 million increase in occupancy cost, a $3.8 million increase in FDIC assessment
offset by a decrease of $9.0 million in business promotion and a decrease of $1.8 million in
repossessed asset provision and expenses.
Net Interest Income
The Corporation reported net interest income of $351.7 million, $356.3 million and $311.7 million
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
To facilitate the comparison of assets with different tax attributes, the interest income on
tax-exempt assets under this heading and under the heading Change in Interest Income and Interest
ExpenseVolume and Rate Analysis, has been adjusted by an amount equal to the income taxes which
would have been paid had the interest income been fully taxable. This tax equivalent adjustment is
derived using the applicable statutory tax rate and resulted in an adjustment of $2.8 million in
2009, 4.7 million in 2008 and $7.5 million in 2007.
37
The following table sets forth the principal components of the Corporations net interest income
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest income tax equivalent basis |
|
$ |
484,949 |
|
|
$ |
605,445 |
|
|
$ |
681,755 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(130,431 |
) |
|
|
(244,449 |
) |
|
|
(362,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income tax equivalent basis |
|
$ |
354,518 |
|
|
$ |
360,996 |
|
|
$ |
319,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin tax equivalent
basis (1) |
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net interest margin for any period equals tax-equivalent net interest income divided by
average interest-earning assets for such period. |
2009 compared to 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009, net interest margin, on a tax
equivalent basis, was 5.56% compared to net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, of 4.50%
for the same period in 2008. This increase of 106 basis points in net interest margin, on a tax
equivalent basis, was mainly due to a decrease of 106 basis points in the cost of average interest
bearing liabilities accompanying of $1.6 billion decrease in average interest bearing liabilities,
resulting in a decrease of $114.0 million in interest expense. The reduction of $114.0 million or
46.7% in interest expense was principally due to the significant reductions of 115 basis points in
the cost of funds of average interest-bearing deposits from 3.16% for the year ended December 31,
2008 to 2.01% for the year ended December 31, 2009 reflecting the repricing of interest bearing
deposits as a result of Federal Reserves interest rate cuts during 2008. The yield on average
interest earning assets increase 5 basis points when compare with prior year. Interest income, on a
tax equivalent basis, decrease $120.5 million mainly due to $1.6 billion decrease in average
interest earning assets. The decrease of $120.5 million in interest income, on a tax equivalent
basis, was due principally to decreases of $89.1 million and $26.6 million in interest income on
average loans and average investment securities, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2009 average interest earning assets decreased $1.6 billion or
20.5%. The decrease in average interest earning assets compared to the previous year was driven by
decreases of $1.1 billion or 16.0% in average net loans, $553.5 million or 48.3% in average
investment securities and $30.0 million or 10.5% in average interest bearing deposits. The
decrease in average net loans was mainly due to the sale of commercial and construction loans,
including some classified as impaired, to an affiliate and repayments on loans, net of
originations. The average commercial and construction loans reflected a decrease of $413.6 million
or 17.0% and $279.0 million or 73.5%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2009 when
compared with the same period in 2008 mainly due to the sale of loans to an affiliate and net
repayments during the period. There was a decrease in average mortgage loans mainly due to a
reduction in mortgage loans origination of $150.3 million when compared with the same period in
prior year. There was a decrease in average consumer loans (including consumer finance) of $146.7
million or 12.1% which comprised $110.4 million and $36.3 million decreases in average personal
loans and consumer finance, respectively. Also, average leasing portfolio experienced a decrease of
$29.2 million or 38.3% was reported since the Corporation has strategically reduced this line of
lending.
The decrease in average interest earning assets, also, was impacted by a reduction in average
investment securities of $553.5 million or 48.3% mainly due to a sale of investment securities
available for sale of $495.4 million during 2009.
The average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $1.6 billion or 22.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 driven by decreases in average interest bearing deposits and average borrowings
of $872.0 million and $748.6 million, respectively, when compared to the year ended December 31,
2008. The decrease or $872.0 million in average interest-bearing deposits was composed of $837.9
million decrease in average brokered deposits and $160.9 million decrease in average other time
deposits offset by an increase of $126.8 million average savings and NOW accounts. The $748.6
million decrease in average borrowings was impacted by a reduction in average securities sold under
agreements to repurchase of $447.0 million mainly caused the early termination of repurchase
agreements of $375 million that were funding investment securities sold during the first quarter of
2009, a decrease in average federal funds and other borrowings of $175.3 million mainly due to the
repayment of the outstanding indebtedness incurred under a bridge facility agreement among the
Corporation, SFS and National Australia Bank Limited during 2008, a reduction of $119.0 million in
average commercial paper and a decrease in average Federal Home Loan Bank Advances (FHLB) of
$66.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared with the same period in 2008. These
decreases were partially offset by an increase of $58.2 million in average subordinated capital
notes due to a subordinated purchase agreement undertook with an affiliate.
38
2008 compared to 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2008, net interest margin, on a tax
equivalent basis, was 4.50% compared with 3.74% for the same period in 2007. The increase of 76
basis points in net interest margin was mainly due to a decrease of 133 basis points in
the cost of interest-bearing liabilities together with a decrease of $489.2 million in average
interest-bearing liabilities. The Corporation also experienced a decrease in the yield of
interest-earning assets of 44 basis points and $515.8 million decrease in average interest-earnings
assets. Net Interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, reflected an increase of $41.8 million or
13.1% resulting from a decrease of $118.1 million or 32.6% in interest expense due to a $77.9
million decrease in interest expense in average borrowings (including average term notes and
average subordinated notes) offset by a decrease of $76.3 million or 11.2% in interest income, on a
tax equivalent basis mainly due to a $53.0 million decrease in interest income on average loans.
The 44 basis points reduction in the yield on the average interest-earnings assets was due to
changes in the mix in the interest-earning assets and the repricing of the interest rate during
2008. There was a reduction of $53.0 million or 8.8% in interest income on average net loans
accompanied by a $21.9 million or 30.7% decrease in interest income on average investment
securities.
Average interest-earning assets decreased $515.8 million or 6.1% to $8.0 billion at December 31,
2008 compared with December 31, 2007. The decrease in average interest-earning assets was driven by
decreases in average investment securities of $330.7 million and average net loans of $315.9
million partially offset by a $130.8 million increase in average interest-bearing deposits. The
decrease of $330.7 million in average investment securities was due to a $346.7 million sale of
investment securities available for sale during the year ended December 31, 2008, which includes
$221.4 million of investment securities pledged as collateral to securities sold under agreements
to repurchase with LBI. The decrease of $315.9 million in average net loans was driven by a $74.3
million decrease in average commercial loans and $101.3 million decrease in average construction
loans principally due to the sale of certain loans, including some classified as impaired, to an
affiliate during the period. There were decreases of $36.1 million in average leasing portfolio
since the Corporation has strategically reduced this line of lending, of $29.7 million in average
mortgage loans and $25.3 million in average consumer loans which comprised a $48.0 million decrease
in average personal loans and a $12.2 million decrease in average consumer finance offset by a
$34.9 million increase in average credit cards.
There was a reduction of 133 basis points in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The
Corporations interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities reflected a decreased of
32.6% to $244.5 million for year ended December 31, 2008 from $362.5 million for the same period in
2007. This reduction was due to a decrease in interest expense on average borrowings (including
average term notes and average subordinated notes) of $77.9 million or 45.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007 and a decrease in interest expense on total average
interest-bearing deposits of $40.2 million or 20.9%. There were decreases in interest expense on
average time deposits and average savings and NOW accounts of $23.4 million and $16.8 million,
respectively, in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Average interest-bearing liabilities reached $7.1 billion as of December 31, 2008, reflecting a
decrease of $489.2 million or 6.4% when compared to figures reported in 2007. The reduction in
average interest-bearing liabilities was mainly due to a decrease in average borrowings (including
term and subordinated notes) of 779.4 million or 25.2% to $2.3 billion in 2008 from $3.1 billion in
2007. The reduction in average borrowings (including term and subordinated notes) was mainly to the
payment of the $700 million outstanding indebtedness incurred under the bridge facility agreement
among the Corporation, SFS and National Australia Bank Limited during the first quarter of 2008 and
the cancellation on September 19, 2008 of $200 million of securities sold under agreements to
repurchase with LBI as result of bankruptcy of its parent LBHI. Also, there were decreases in
average commercial paper and average term notes of $169.9 million or 44.8% and $18.5 million or
48.5%, respectively, when compared with the same period in prior year. These decreases were
partially offset by an increase in average Federal Home Loan Bank Advances of $177.8 million or
18.8%. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $290.2 million or 6.4% to reach $4.8 billion as
of December 31, 2008 and include an increase in average other time deposits of $330.8 million or
23.3% offset by decreases of $24.5 million and $16.0 million in average savings and Now accounts
and average brokered deposits, respectively, when compared with the figures reported in the prior
year. The increase in average interest bearing deposits is mainly due to a certificate of deposit
in the amount of $630 million held by Banco Santander, S.A. in Banco Santander Puerto Rico during
the first quarter of 2008.
The following table shows average balances and, where applicable, interest amounts earned on a
tax-equivalent basis and average rates for the Corporations assets and liabilities and
stockholders equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits |
|
$ |
240,496 |
|
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
$ |
81,851 |
|
|
$ |
1,063 |
|
|
|
1.30 |
% |
|
$ |
85,278 |
|
|
$ |
3,343 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
Federal funds sold and
securities purchased under
agreements to resell |
|
|
14,053 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
202,658 |
|
|
|
4,333 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
68,477 |
|
|
|
3,456 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
254,549 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
% |
|
|
284,509 |
|
|
|
5,396 |
|
|
|
1.90 |
% |
|
|
153,755 |
|
|
|
6,799 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.Treasury securities |
|
|
133,740 |
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
42,604 |
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
2.41 |
% |
|
|
91,384 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
% |
Obligations of other U.S. government
agencies and corporations |
|
|
45,343 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
% |
|
|
417,457 |
|
|
|
14,122 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
% |
|
|
635,219 |
|
|
|
29,561 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
89,543 |
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of the government of Puerto Rico
and political subdivisions |
|
|
147,753 |
|
|
|
9,565 |
|
|
|
6.47 |
% |
|
|
100,610 |
|
|
|
5,633 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
|
95,781 |
|
|
|
5,113 |
|
|
|
5.34 |
% |
Collateralized mortgage obligations and
mortgage backed securities |
|
|
118,946 |
|
|
|
6,050 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
% |
|
|
519,311 |
|
|
|
24,752 |
|
|
|
4.77 |
% |
|
|
588,719 |
|
|
|
28,422 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
% |
Other |
|
|
56,198 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
% |
|
|
65,035 |
|
|
|
3,820 |
|
|
|
5.87 |
% |
|
|
64,591 |
|
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
|
591,523 |
|
|
|
22,756 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
% |
|
|
1,145,017 |
|
|
|
49,355 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
% |
|
|
1,475,694 |
|
|
|
71,262 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
2,017,909 |
|
|
|
92,424 |
|
|
|
4.58 |
% |
|
|
2,431,527 |
|
|
|
137,263 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
2,505,825 |
|
|
|
172,671 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
100,819 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
379,857 |
|
|
|
16,363 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
% |
|
|
481,174 |
|
|
|
38,479 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
503,112 |
|
|
|
79,624 |
|
|
|
15.83 |
% |
|
|
613,499 |
|
|
|
86,960 |
|
|
|
14.17 |
% |
|
|
626,580 |
|
|
|
79,531 |
|
|
|
12.69 |
% |
Consumer Finance |
|
|
559,823 |
|
|
|
133,638 |
|
|
|
23.87 |
% |
|
|
596,129 |
|
|
|
141,701 |
|
|
|
23.77 |
% |
|
|
608,366 |
|
|
|
139,075 |
|
|
|
22.86 |
% |
Mortgage |
|
|
2,492,276 |
|
|
|
149,841 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
% |
|
|
2,662,726 |
|
|
|
163,360 |
|
|
|
6.14 |
% |
|
|
2,692,448 |
|
|
|
166,192 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
Lease financing |
|
|
47,038 |
|
|
|
3,116 |
|
|
|
6.62 |
% |
|
|
76,204 |
|
|
|
5,047 |
|
|
|
6.62 |
% |
|
|
112,268 |
|
|
|
7,746 |
|
|
|
6.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans |
|
|
5,720,977 |
|
|
|
461,585 |
|
|
|
8.07 |
% |
|
|
6,759,942 |
|
|
|
550,694 |
|
|
|
8.15 |
% |
|
|
7,026,661 |
|
|
|
603,694 |
|
|
|
8.59 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(191,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,897 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
5,529,239 |
|
|
|
461,585 |
|
|
|
8.35 |
% |
|
|
6,584,842 |
|
|
|
550,694 |
|
|
|
8.36 |
% |
|
|
6,900,764 |
|
|
|
603,694 |
|
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets/ interest
income (tax-equivalent basis) |
|
|
6,375,311 |
|
|
|
484,949 |
|
|
|
7.61 |
% |
|
|
8,014,368 |
|
|
|
605,445 |
|
|
|
7.55 |
% |
|
|
8,530,213 |
|
|
|
681,755 |
|
|
|
7.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest-earning assets |
|
|
737,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
7,112,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,740,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,199,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW accounts |
|
$ |
1,817,911 |
|
|
$ |
19,016 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
$ |
1,691,094 |
|
|
$ |
34,944 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
$ |
1,715,631 |
|
|
$ |
51,785 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
% |
Other time deposits |
|
|
1,589,018 |
|
|
|
42,932 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
% |
|
|
1,749,942 |
|
|
|
56,905 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
1,419,185 |
|
|
|
65,810 |
|
|
|
4.64 |
% |
Brokered deposits |
|
|
547,419 |
|
|
|
17,525 |
|
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
1,385,318 |
|
|
|
60,603 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
1,401,310 |
|
|
|
73,820 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
3,954,348 |
|
|
|
79,473 |
|
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
4,826,354 |
|
|
|
152,452 |
|
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
4,536,126 |
|
|
|
191,415 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
% |
Borrowings |
|
|
1,240,099 |
|
|
|
35,600 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
2,047,442 |
|
|
|
78,049 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
|
2,805,003 |
|
|
|
153,951 |
|
|
|
5.49 |
% |
Term Notes |
|
|
20,279 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
19,674 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
38,223 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
% |
Subordinated Notes |
|
|
305,605 |
|
|
|
14,722 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
% |
|
|
247,419 |
|
|
|
13,317 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
250,721 |
|
|
|
15,887 |
|
|
|
6.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
interest expense |
|
|
5,520,331 |
|
|
|
130,431 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
7,140,889 |
|
|
|
244,449 |
|
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
7,630,073 |
|
|
|
362,531 |
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,022,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,035,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
996,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,543,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,176,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,626,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
569,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
573,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
7,112,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,740,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,199,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
354,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
360,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
319,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.24 |
% |
Cost of funding earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.25 |
% |
Net interest margin (tax equivalent basis) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
40
Changes in Interest Income and Interest Expense-Volume and Rate Analysis
The following table allocates changes in the Corporations tax equivalent interest income and
interest expense between changes in the average volume of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities and changes in their respective interest rates for the years 2009
compared to 2008 and 2008 compared to 2007. Volume and rate variances have been calculated based
on activities in average balances over the period and changes in interest rates on average
interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
2008 vs. 2007 |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to change in: |
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to change in: |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income tax equivalent basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
$ |
(2,325 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,941 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,266 |
) |
|
$ |
3,756 |
|
|
$ |
(2,879 |
) |
|
$ |
877 |
|
Time deposits with other banks |
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
(1,388 |
) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(2,151 |
) |
|
|
(2,280 |
) |
Investment securities |
|
|
(21,760 |
) |
|
|
(4,839 |
) |
|
|
(26,599 |
) |
|
|
(14,810 |
) |
|
|
(7,097 |
) |
|
|
(21,907 |
) |
Loans, net |
|
|
(88,124 |
) |
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
(89,109 |
) |
|
|
(27,016 |
) |
|
|
(25,984 |
) |
|
|
(53,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
(111,343 |
) |
|
|
(9,153 |
) |
|
|
(120,496 |
) |
|
|
(38,199 |
) |
|
|
(38,111 |
) |
|
|
(76,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW accounts |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
(18,378 |
) |
|
|
(15,928 |
) |
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
(16,111 |
) |
|
|
(16,841 |
) |
Other time deposits |
|
|
(32,251 |
) |
|
|
(24,800 |
) |
|
|
(57,051 |
) |
|
|
14,509 |
|
|
|
(37,876 |
) |
|
|
(23,367 |
) |
Borrowings |
|
|
(26,103 |
) |
|
|
(16,346 |
) |
|
|
(42,449 |
) |
|
|
(35,377 |
) |
|
|
(39,251 |
) |
|
|
(74,628 |
) |
Long-term borrowings |
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
(1,239 |
) |
|
|
(2,007 |
) |
|
|
(3,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
(53,041 |
) |
|
|
(60,977 |
) |
|
|
(114,018 |
) |
|
|
(22,837 |
) |
|
|
(95,245 |
) |
|
|
(118,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense) tax
equivalent basis |
|
$ |
(58,302 |
) |
|
$ |
51,824 |
|
|
$ |
(6,478 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,362 |
) |
|
$ |
57,134 |
|
|
$ |
41,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, the increase in net interest income on a tax equivalent basis was driven primarily by
decreases in volume and rate on interest bearing-liabilities of 106 basis points accompanied by a
decrease in volume and yield earned on interest-earning assets of 6 basis points. The increase in
net interest income was mainly due to the repricing of interest bearing deposits as a result of
Federal Reserves interest rate cuts during 2008.
During 2008, the increase in net interest income on a tax equivalent basis was driven primarily by
decreases in volume and rate on interest bearing-liabilities of 133 basis points accompanied by a
decrease in volume and yield earned on interest-earning assets of 44 basis points. The increase in
net interest income was attributed to a significant cost of funds reduction and the refinancing of
existing debts.
Provision for Loan Losses
2009 compared to 2008. The provision for loan losses decreased $23.0 million or 13.1% to reach
$152.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $175.5 million for the year ended December
31, 2008. The decrease in the provision for loan losses was due primarily to the sale of certain
loans including some classified as impaired to an affiliate during the year, a reduction loan
portfolio and overall improvement in credit ratios metrics.
2008 compared to 2007. The provision for loan losses increased $27.7 million or 18.7% from $147.8
million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $175.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The increase in the provision for loan losses was due primarily to increases in
non-performing loans due to the deterioration in economic conditions in Puerto Rico, requiring the
Corporation to increase the level of its allowance for loan losses.
41
Refer to the discussions under Allowance for Loan Losses and Risk Management for further
analysis of the allowance for loan losses, the allocation of the allowance by loan category and
non-performing assets and related ratios.
Other Income
Other income consists of service charges on deposit accounts, other service fees, including
mortgage servicing fees and fees on credit cards, broker-dealer, asset management and insurance
fees, gains and losses on sales of securities, gain on sale of mortgage servicing rights, certain
other gains and losses and certain other income.
The following table sets forth the components of our other income for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars In thousands) |
|
Bank service fees on deposit accounts |
|
$ |
12,403 |
|
|
$ |
12,975 |
|
|
$ |
13,603 |
|
Other service fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card fees |
|
|
9,412 |
|
|
|
8,788 |
|
|
|
10,872 |
|
Mortgage-servicing fees |
|
|
4,087 |
|
|
|
3,555 |
|
|
|
3,010 |
|
Trust fees |
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
Confirming advances |
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
6,200 |
|
|
|
4,169 |
|
Other fees |
|
|
10,963 |
|
|
|
11,606 |
|
|
|
13,633 |
|
Broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees |
|
|
62,688 |
|
|
|
74,808 |
|
|
|
68,265 |
|
Gain on sale of securities, net |
|
|
9,251 |
|
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
5,144 |
|
|
|
3,253 |
|
|
|
6,658 |
|
Trading gains |
|
|
3,275 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
Gain (loss) on derivatives and other financial instruments |
|
|
(7,303 |
) |
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
Other (loss) gains, net |
|
|
(1,637 |
) |
|
|
5,739 |
|
|
|
18,644 |
|
Other |
|
|
11,191 |
|
|
|
8,304 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
122,446 |
|
|
$ |
147,835 |
|
|
$ |
148,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below details the breakdown of commissions from broker-dealer, asset management and
insurance operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Broker-dealer |
|
$ |
34,281 |
|
|
$ |
40,480 |
|
|
$ |
32,147 |
|
Asset management |
|
|
25,359 |
|
|
|
26,833 |
|
|
|
24,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Santander Securities and subsidiary |
|
|
59,640 |
|
|
|
67,313 |
|
|
|
56,509 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
|
7,495 |
|
|
|
11,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
62,688 |
|
|
$ |
74,808 |
|
|
$ |
68,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 compared to 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009, other income reflected a
reduction of 25.4 million or 17.2% as compared with figures reported in the prior year.
Broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees reflected a decrease of $12.1 million or 16.2%
due decreases of $7.7 million in broker-dealer and asset management fees and $4.4 million in
insurance fees due to a reduction in credit life commissions generated from the Bank and Island
Finance operations. The broker-dealer operation is carried out through Santander Securities
Corporation, whose business includes securities underwriting and distribution, sales, trading,
financial planning and securities brokerage services. In addition, Santander Securities provides
investment management services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Santander Asset Management
Corporation. The broker-
dealer asset management and insurance operations contributed 51.2%, 50.6% and 46.1% of commissions
to the Corporations other income for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
The Corporation reported an increase in gain on sale of securities available for sale of $4.1
million. During 2009, the Corporation sold $495.4 million of investment securities available for
sale and realized a gain of $9.3 million. This gain was
42
offset by a loss of $9.6 million, included in other gains (losses), on the early termination of
repurchase agreements that were funding the securities sold. During 2008, the Corporation sold
$346.7 million of investment securities available for sale resulting in a gain of $5.2 million.
There was a gain of $3.3 million on the sale of a portion of the Corporations investment in Visa,
Inc. during the third quarter of 2009 compared with a gain of $8.6 million during the first quarter
2008 in connection with Visas initial public offering. A loss of $7.3 million on derivatives and
other financial instruments was recognized at December 31, 2009 compared with a gain of $3.3
million for the same period in prior year mostly resulting from the credit risk component
incorporated into the fair value calculation of a subordinated notes and brokered deposits. These
decreases were partially offset by an unfavorable valuation adjustment of $7.4 million for loans
held for sale recorded during 2008 and $4.4 million increase in loan administration fees collected
from loan sold to affiliates.
Bank service charges, fees and other decreased $4.8 million, or 10.9% for the year ended December
31, 2009. These reductions were principally due to $4.3 million decrease in commissions from
confirming advances. The confirming advances portfolio experienced a reduction of $8.9 million
during 2009 when compared with 2008.
2008 compared to 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2008, other income remained
basically flat as compared with figures reported in the prior year. Broker-dealer, asset management
and insurance fees reflected an increase of $6.5 million or 9.6% due to increases in broker-dealer
and asset management fees of $10.8 million partially offset by a decrease of $4.3 million in
insurance fees due to a reduction of $3.1 million and $1.1 million in credit life commissions
generated from the Bank and Island Finance operations, respectively. The broker-dealer asset
management and insurance operations contributed 50.6% of commissions to the Corporations other
income for the year ended December 31, 2008.
There was a gain of $8.6 million on the sale of a portion of the Corporations investment in Visa,
Inc. in connection with its initial public offering during the first quarter of 2008. A gain on
sale of securities of $5.2 million or a $3.9 million increase was recognized for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This increase was driven by a sale of investment securities of $346.7 million
during 2008, including $221.4 million related to investment securities available for sale held as
collateral by LBI under securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The Corporation recognized
a $2.3 million gain in connection with the settlement of the securities pledged as collateral to
securities sold under agreements to repurchase. Also, the Corporation reported an increase in gain
on derivative instruments of $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared with the
prior year mainly due to the net effect of incorporating the Corporations credit risk in the
derivative fair value calculation methodology pursuant the adoption of SFAS 157, a $1.0 million
increase in swap income, $1.2 million increase in technical assistance collected from affiliates
and an additional fees received of $1.0 million as part of the agreement for the sale of the
Corporations merchant business during 2007. These increases were partially offset by an
unfavorable valuation adjustment of $7.4 million for loans held for sale, a decrease in other gain
of $12.9 due mainly to a $12.2 million in gain of sale of merchant business to an unrelated party
during 2007. Also, there was a $3.4 million decrease in gain on sale of loans. The Corporation
reported $105.8 million in mortgage loans sold, a reduction of $145.7 million or 57.9%, for the
year ended December 31, 2008 compared with $251.4 million mortgage loans sold during 2007.
Bank service charges, fees and other decreased $2.6 million, or 5.3% for the year ended December
31, 2008. These reductions were principally due to a $2.1 million decrease in credit card fees due
to the sale of the Corporations merchant business to an unrelated third party during the first
quarter of 2007.
43
Operating Expenses
The following table sets forth information as to the Corporations other operating expenses for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Salaries |
|
$ |
60,241 |
|
|
$ |
76,012 |
|
|
$ |
72,927 |
|
Pension and other benefits |
|
|
52,594 |
|
|
|
57,200 |
|
|
|
72,815 |
|
Expenses deferred as loan origination costs |
|
|
(5,816 |
) |
|
|
(8,076 |
) |
|
|
(11,484 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total personnel costs |
|
|
107,019 |
|
|
|
125,136 |
|
|
|
134,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy costs |
|
|
25,291 |
|
|
|
27,665 |
|
|
|
23,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
|
4,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP servicing expense, amortization and technical services |
|
|
40,645 |
|
|
|
41,860 |
|
|
|
39,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications |
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
10,062 |
|
|
|
10,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business promotion |
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
6,628 |
|
|
|
15,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other taxes |
|
|
13,270 |
|
|
|
13,101 |
|
|
|
12,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees |
|
|
14,609 |
|
|
|
22,094 |
|
|
|
14,330 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
3,067 |
|
|
|
3,828 |
|
Printing and supplies |
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
1,926 |
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
Credit card expenses |
|
|
6,357 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
6,198 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
3,371 |
|
|
|
4,029 |
|
Examinations & FDIC assessment |
|
|
12,547 |
|
|
|
5,952 |
|
|
|
2,194 |
|
Transportation and travel |
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
2,981 |
|
Repossessed assets provision and expenses |
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
5,717 |
|
|
|
7,482 |
|
Collections and related legal costs |
|
|
2,102 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Provision for claim receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
17,819 |
|
|
|
19,528 |
|
|
|
15,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other |
|
|
66,033 |
|
|
|
95,817 |
|
|
|
60,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non personnel expenses |
|
|
162,048 |
|
|
|
199,491 |
|
|
|
209,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Operating Expenses |
|
$ |
269,067 |
|
|
$ |
324,627 |
|
|
$ |
344,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio-on a tax equivalent basis |
|
|
56.77 |
% |
|
|
60.39 |
% |
|
|
66.32 |
% |
Personnel cost to average assets |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
1.43 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
Other operating expenses to average assets |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
2.28 |
% |
Assets per employee |
|
$ |
3,836 |
|
|
$ |
4,467 |
|
|
$ |
3,494 |
|
2009 compared to 2008. The Efficiency Ratio, on a tax equivalent basis, was 56.77% and
60.39% for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, reflecting an improvement of
362 basis points. This improvement was mainly the result of a reduction in operating expenses. The
effect of the $25.1 million provision for claim receivable recognized during 2008 were excluded
from operating expenses to determine the Efficiency Ratio, on a tax equivalent basis.
The Corporations operating expenses reflected a decrease of $55.6 million or 17.1% to $269.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2009 when compared with the year ended December 31, 2008.
This decrease was driven by a decrease in net salaries and other employee benefits of $18.1 million
and $37.5 million other operating expense. The decrease in total personnel cost of $18.1 million
principally attributed to $15.8 million decrease in salaries expense and $9.1 million decrease in
other employee benefits (which comprised principally a $5.0 million decrease in bonuses and
commissions) partially offset by increases of 4.5 million in incentive stock plan expense and $2.3
million expense of loan origination cost being deferred.
The $37.5 million decrease in other operating expense was principally due a provision for claim
receivable of $25.1 million recognized during the third quarter of 2008 which represent the excess
of the value of the securities held by LBI over the amount owned by the Corporation under the
securities sold under agreement to repurchase. The Corporation also reported decreases of $7.5
million decrease in professional fees due to a decrease in consulting fees related to the review of
certain operational procedures during 2008, $2.8 million in business promotion, $2.4 million in
occupancy cost, $2.1 million in
44
insurance expense, $1.2 million in EDP and technical services, $1.0 million in communications and
$0.7 million in repossessed assets provision and expense. These expense reductions were partially
offset by $6.6 million increase in FDIC assessment due to the assessment systems implemented under
the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 that imposed insurance premiums based on factors
such as capital level, supervisory rating, certain financial ratios and risk information and
special assessment of 5 basis points, and no more than 10 basis points, of insured depository
institutions assets minus Tier 1 capital.
2008 compared to 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Efficiency Ratio, on a
tax equivalent basis, was 60.39% reflecting an improvement of 593 basis points compared to 66.32%
for the year ended December 31, 2007. This improvement was mainly the result of higher net interest
income and a reduction in operating expenses. The effect of the $43.3 million for goodwill and
other intangible assets impairment charges recognized during 2007 and $25.1 million provision for
claim receivable recognized during 2008 were excluded from operating expenses to determine the
Efficiency Ratio, on a tax equivalent basis.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, operating expenses amounted $324.6 million, a decrease of
$19.4 million or 5.6% compared to $344.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease
in operating expenses was principally due to a $43.3 million related to goodwill and other
intangible assets impairment charges recognized during 2007, a $16.0 million decrease in stock
incentive compensation expense sponsored by Santander Group, a provision for claim receivable of
$25.1 million recognized during 2008, a $7.8 million increase in professional fees due to an
increment in consulting fees related to the adoption of new accounting pronouncements and the
review of other operational procedures, a $6.9 million increase in salaries and other personnel
expenses mainly due to severance payments related to personnel reductions, a $3.9 million increase
in occupancy cost due to the sale and leaseback of the Corporations two principal properties in
December 2007, a $3.8 million increase in FDIC assessment due to the 2007 assessment systems
implemented under the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 that imposed insurance premiums
based on factors such as capital level, supervisory rating, certain financial ratios and risk
information, offset by a decrease of $9.0 million in business promotion and a decrease of $1.8
million in repossessed asset provision and expenses.
Income Taxes
Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the PR Code), the Corporation and each
of its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file
consolidated tax returns in Puerto Rico. The maximum statutory marginal corporate income tax rate
is 39%. Furthermore, there is an alternative minimum tax of 22%. The difference between the
statutory marginal tax rate and the effective tax rate is primarily due to the interest income
earned on certain investments and loans, which is exempt from income tax (net of the disallowance
of expenses attributable to the exempt income) and to the disallowance of certain expenses and
other items. The PR Code provides dividends received deduction of 100% on dividends received from
controlled subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico. The Corporation is also subject to
municipal license tax at various rates that do not exceed 1.5% of the Corporations taxable gross
income. .
On July 2009, Governor of Puerto Rico signed Act No. 37, which amends Act No. 7 of March 9, 2009.
This law imposed a temporary three-year surcharge of 5% commencing on taxable year 2009. Since the
5% surcharge is imposed on the tax liability instead of the income subject to tax, the effect of
the 5% surcharge will be that during the temporary period the 39% maximum statutory marginal
corporate income tax rate may be increased to 40.95%. Also, the amendments of Act No. 7 of March 9,
2009, particularly to alternative minimum tax (AMT), eliminates the deduction for expenses
incurred outside Puerto Rico unless these payments are subject to income tax in Puerto Rico.
This law, also, includes a temporary 5% special income tax applicable to Puerto Rico international
banking entities, or IBEs, such as Santander International Bank (SIB), which, before this law, was
exempt from taxation under Puerto Rico law. This special income tax shall be applicable for taxable
years 2009, 2010 and 2011
The Corporation adopted the provisions under FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Tax. These provisions
clarify the accounting for uncertainty of income tax recognized in a enterprises financial
statements in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740. This interpretation prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statements recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition.
In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate
realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during
the periods in which the temporary differences become deductible. Management
45
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable
income and projections for future taxable income, management believes it is more likely than not,
the Corporation will not realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets related to Santander
Financial Services, Inc. and Santander Bancorp (parent company only) amounting to $14.5 million and
$0.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009
and $ 20.6 million and $ 0.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2008.
Accordingly, deferred tax asset valuation
allowances of $14.5 million and $0.1 million
at December 31, 2009 and $ 20.6 million and $0.1 million at December 31, 2008
for Santander Financial Services, Inc and Santander
Bancorp (parent company only), respectively, were recorded.
2009 compared to 2008. The income tax provision was $11.3 million as of December 31, 2009,
reflecting an increase of $17.9 million over one year. The Corporation reported an income tax
benefit of $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in the provision for
income tax during 2009 was due in primarily to higher taxable income in 2009 compared to 2008.
Refer to Note 17 of the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
2008 compared to 2007. The income tax benefit was $6.5 million a decrease of $10.7 million or
255.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to provision for income tax $4.2 million for
the same period in 2007. The decrease in the provision for income tax during 2008 was due in
primarily to lower taxable income in 2008 compared to 2007. Refer to Note 17 of the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
Financial Condition
Assets
The Corporations total assets as of December 31, 2009 reached $6.8 billion, a $1.1 billion
decrease when compared to $7.9 billion as of December 31, 2008. The decrease of $1.1 billion was
driven principally by $694.8 million decrease in net loans and $384.5 million decrease in
investment securities portfolio partially offset by $44.8 million increase in total cash and cash
equivalents.
There was a decrease in other assets of $50.4 million, which consisted mainly of decreases of $78.4
million in derivative assets and $8.8 million in confirming advances. These decreases were
partially offset by increases of $25.2 million in prepaid expenses as a result $25.8 million of
prepaid FDIC insurance and $12.2 million in real estate owned.
Short Term Investments and Interest-bearing Deposits in Other Financial Institutions
The Corporation sells federal funds, purchases securities under agreements to resell and deposits
funds in interest-bearing accounts in other financial institutions to help meet liquidity
requirements and provide temporary holdings until the funds can be otherwise invested or utilized.
As of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation had interest-bearing deposits, federal
funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell as detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
12,376 |
|
|
$ |
8,370 |
|
|
$ |
6,606 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
22,146 |
|
|
|
64,871 |
|
|
|
82,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,522 |
|
|
$ |
73,241 |
|
|
$ |
89,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
Investment Portfolio
The following tables set forth the Corporations investments in government securities and certain
other financial investments at December 31, 2009 and 2008, by contractual maturity, giving
comparative carrying and fair values and average yield for each of the categories. The Corporation
has evaluated the conditions under which it might sell its investment securities. As a result,
most of its investment securities have been classified as available for sale. The Corporation may
decide to sell some of the securities classified as available for sale either as part of its
efforts to manage its interest rate risk, or in response to changes in interest rates, prepayment
risk or similar economic factors. Investment securities available for sale are carried at fair
value and unrealized gains and losses net of taxes on these investments are included in accumulated
other comprehensive income or loss, which is a separate component of stockholders equity.
Gains or losses on sales of investment securities available for sale are recognized when realized
and are computed on the basis of specific identification. At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
investment securities available for sale were $0.4 billion, $0.8 billion and $1.3 billion,
respectively. The investment securities available for sale reflected a decrease of $384.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared with the same period in prior year which. This
reduction was driven by a sale of $495.4 million investment securities during 2009. The Corporation
recognized a $9.3 million gain in connection with the settlement of these securities.
Other investment securities include debt, equity or other securities that do not have readily
determinable fair values and are stated at amortized cost. The Corporation includes in this
category stock owned to comply with regulatory requirements, such as Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
stock.
The Corporation acquires certain securities for trading purposes and carries its trading account at
fair value. Financial instruments including, to a limited extent, derivatives, such as option
contracts, are used in dealing and other trading activities and are carried at fair value. The
Corporation classifies as trading those securities that are acquired and held principally for the
purpose of selling them in the near term. Realized and unrealized changes in fair value are
recorded separately in the trading profit or loss account as part of the results of operations in
the period in which the changes occur. At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation had
$47.7 million, $64.7 million and $68.5 million of securities held for trading, respectively.
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Corporations investment
securities available for sale by major category as of the December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
Available for Sale |
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
175,330 |
|
|
$ |
175,330 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
64,455 |
|
|
$ |
64,455 |
|
U.S. Agency Notes |
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
141,916 |
|
|
|
141,916 |
|
|
|
609,223 |
|
|
|
609,223 |
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
142,517 |
|
|
|
142,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.R. Government
Obligations |
|
|
83,435 |
|
|
|
83,435 |
|
|
|
148,616 |
|
|
|
148,616 |
|
|
|
49,288 |
|
|
|
49,288 |
|
Mortgage-backed
Securities |
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
481,530 |
|
|
|
481,530 |
|
|
|
545,182 |
|
|
|
545,182 |
|
Foreign Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
417,608 |
|
|
$ |
417,608 |
|
|
$ |
802,112 |
|
|
$ |
802,112 |
|
|
$ |
1,268,198 |
|
|
$ |
1,268,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below summarize the contractual maturity of the Corporations available for sale and
other investment securities at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One |
|
|
After Five Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
Year to |
|
|
to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Five Years |
|
|
Ten Years |
|
|
Over Ten Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
99,996 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
% |
|
$ |
75,333 |
|
|
|
1.58 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
175,329 |
|
|
$ |
175,329 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
% |
U.S. Agency Notes |
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
% |
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,517 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,517 |
|
|
|
142,517 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
P.R.
Government Obligations |
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
72,355 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
% |
|
|
6,546 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
|
3,341 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
83,435 |
|
|
|
83,435 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
Mortgage-backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
% |
Foreign Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Securities |
|
|
55,431 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,431 |
|
|
|
55,431 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
$ |
162,412 |
|
|
|
1.78 |
% |
|
$ |
290,205 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
$ |
6,546 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
|
$ |
13,876 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
$ |
473,039 |
|
|
$ |
473,039 |
|
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One |
|
|
After Five Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
Year to |
|
|
to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Five Years |
|
|
Ten Years |
|
|
Over Ten Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
% |
U.S. Agency Notes |
|
|
136,007 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
% |
|
|
5,909 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,916 |
|
|
|
141,916 |
|
|
|
2.85 |
% |
P.R.
Government Obligations |
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
133,148 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
% |
|
|
9,479 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
|
4,535 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
% |
|
|
148,616 |
|
|
|
148,616 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
% |
Mortgage-backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,815 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
|
|
285,715 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
% |
|
|
481,530 |
|
|
|
481,530 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
Foreign Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
Other Securities |
|
|
50,382 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,632 |
|
|
|
61,632 |
|
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
$ |
217,843 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
% |
|
$ |
150,357 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
% |
|
$ |
205,294 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
% |
|
$ |
290,250 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
% |
|
$ |
863,744 |
|
|
$ |
863,744 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One |
|
|
After Five Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within |
|
|
Year to |
|
|
to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Five Years |
|
|
Ten Years |
|
|
Over Ten Years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Avg |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
64,455 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,455 |
|
|
$ |
64,455 |
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
U.S. Agency Notes |
|
|
253,423 |
|
|
|
2.84 |
% |
|
|
355,800 |
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609,223 |
|
|
|
609,223 |
|
|
|
3.40 |
% |
P.R.
Government Obligations |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
19,775 |
|
|
|
4.44 |
% |
|
|
15,111 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
% |
|
|
13,035 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
% |
|
|
49,288 |
|
|
|
49,288 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Mortgage-backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,124 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
320,058 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
% |
|
|
545,182 |
|
|
|
545,182 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
Foreign Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
Other Securities |
|
|
64,559 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,559 |
|
|
|
64,559 |
|
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities |
|
$ |
383,804 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
$ |
375,625 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
$ |
240,235 |
|
|
|
4.45 |
% |
|
$ |
333,093 |
|
|
|
5.42 |
% |
|
$ |
1,332,757 |
|
|
$ |
1,332,757 |
|
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
Loan Portfolio
The following table analyzes the Corporations loans by type of loan, including loans held for
sale, as of December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail commercial banking: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle-market |
|
$ |
1,249,993 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1,363,742 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
$ |
1,646,046 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
$ |
1,692,058 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,593,359 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
% |
Agricultural |
|
|
36,205 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
46,032 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
63,204 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
59,315 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
61,531 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
SBA |
|
|
38,696 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
51,871 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
63,825 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
66,734 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
69,763 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Factor liens |
|
|
9,488 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
10,268 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
18,252 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
20,553 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
16,696 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
4,688 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
6,965 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
40,072 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail commercial banking |
|
|
1,334,382 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
1,472,810 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
1,796,015 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
1,845,625 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
% |
|
|
1,781,421 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
% |
Corporate banking |
|
|
612,197 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
691,976 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
765,310 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
673,566 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
1,205,664 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
70,707 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
194,026 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
484,237 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
435,182 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
213,705 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Lease Financing |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
60,615 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
92,641 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
132,655 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
125,168 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial |
|
|
2,052,286 |
|
|
|
37.5 |
% |
|
|
2,419,427 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
% |
|
|
3,138,203 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
% |
|
|
3,087,028 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
% |
|
|
3,325,958 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal (installment and other
loans) |
|
|
207,156 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
305,058 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
402,195 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
383,460 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
378,269 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Automobile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Credit Cards |
|
|
236,789 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
261,531 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
240,858 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
193,260 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
169,416 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Consumer Finance |
|
|
558,948 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
578,243 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
611,114 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
625,266 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer |
|
|
1,002,893 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
1,144,832 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
|
|
1,254,167 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
% |
|
|
1,201,988 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
548,295 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
2,412,136 |
|
|
|
44.1 |
% |
|
|
2,591,930 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
|
2,682,362 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
2,649,128 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
% |
|
|
2,141,358 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
% |
Commercial |
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
6,121 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage |
|
|
2,415,294 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
% |
|
|
2,595,588 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
% |
|
|
2,685,962 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
2,654,540 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
|
2,147,479 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans, net of unearned interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and deferred fees |
|
$ |
5,470,473 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,159,847 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,078,332 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,943,556 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
6,021,732 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, reflected a decrease of $689.4
million or 11.2%, to $5.4 billion at December 31, 2009, compared to the figures reported as of
December 31, 2008.
The commercial and construction portfolio experienced a decrease of $218.2 million and $123.3
million, respectively over last year. The reduction in these portfolios was basically due to the
sale to an affiliate of $131.2 million of commercial and industrial and construction loans,
including some classified as impaired, and $210.3 million of repayments, net of originations for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Corporation reported decrease in mortgage portfolio of $180.3 million or 7.0% for the year
ended December 31, 2009 when compared with the same period in the prior year. For the year ended
December 31, 2009 residential mortgage loans origination was $150.3 million or 43.5%, less than the
$345.7 million originated during the same period in 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2009,
mortgage loans sold and securitized were $169.5 million, a $43.9 million less than mortgage loans
sold and securitized during 2008. Also, there was a decrease in consumer loans portfolio (credit cards and personal
installment
49
loans and consumer finance) of $141.9 million or 12.4% which comprised decreases of $97.9
million in personal loans, $24.7 million in credit card and $19.3 million in consumer finance, when
compared with the same figures in 2008.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation sold certain loans including some
classified as impaired to an affiliate for $142.0 million in cash. These loans had a net book value
of $142.0 million comprised of an outstanding principal balance of $149.2 million and a specific
valuation allowance of $7.2 million. The type of loans sold, at net book value, was $65.5 million
in construction loans, $61.2 million in commercial loans and $15.3 million in mortgage loans. No
gain or loss was recognized on this transaction.
During 2009, the Corporation has restructured residential real estate loans and commercial loans
whose terms have been modified and was already identified as a Trouble Debt Restructuring (TDRs),
as stated on FASB ASC Topic 310, Receivables. This FASB ASC Topic states that a restructuring of
a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons
related to the debtors financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not
otherwise consider. Once a loan is determined to be a TDR, then various effects must be
considered, such as: identifying the loan as impaired, performing an impairment analysis, applying
proper revenue recognition accounting, and reviewing its regulatory credit risk grading. Total
restructured loans under this program amounted $95.1 million as of December 31, 2009. Refer to the
Allowance for Loan Losses section for further information.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporation assesses the overall risks in its loan portfolio and establishes and maintains an
allowance for probable losses thereon. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level
sufficient to provide for estimated loan losses based on the evaluation of known and inherent risks
in the Corporations loan portfolio. The Corporations management evaluates the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses on a monthly basis.
The determination of the allowance for loan losses is one of the most complex and critical
accounting estimates the Corporations management makes. The allowance for loan losses is composed
of three different components. An asset-specific reserve based on the provisions of accounting
standard FASB ASC Topic 310 Receivables (as amended), an expected loss estimate based on the
provisions of FASB ASC Topic 450 Contingencies, and an unallocated reserve based on the effect of
probable economic deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the asset-specific component
of the allowance.
Commercial, construction loans and certain mortgage loans exceeding a predetermined monetary
threshold are identified for evaluation of impairment on an individual basis pursuant accounting
standard Topic 310. The Corporation considers a loan impaired when interest and/or principal is
past due 90 days or more, or, when based on current information and events it is probable that the
Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the
loan agreement. The asset-specific reserve on each individual loan identified as impaired is
measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans
effective interest rate, except as a practical expedient, the Corporation may measure impairment
based on the loans observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, net of estimated
disposal costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. Most of the asset-specific reserves of the
Corporations impaired loans are measured on the basis of the fair value of the collateral. The
fair value of the collateral is determined by external valuation specialists and since these values
cannot be observed or corroborated with market data, they are classified as Level 3 and presented
as part of non-recurring measurement disclosures.
A reserve for expected losses is determined under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 450 for all
loans not evaluated individually for impairment. Effective July 1, 2009, the Corporation revised
its quantitative methodology for estimating the allowance for loan losses for the consumer and
consumer finance portfolios. Through the end of the second quarter ended June 30, 2009, the
Corporations quantitative methodology for estimating the allowance for loan losses for the
consumer and consumer finance portfolios was based on a historical loss rate analysis, which relied
on historical loss experience over a defined period for pools of loans with common characteristics. The revised quantitative methodology is based on a
migration analysis/roll rate and considers both historical loss rates and loss rates based on the
likelihood of credit deterioration (expectation of current loans becoming delinquent in monthly
increments until they default and are charged-off). The loss factor estimated based on this
methodology may be adjusted to incorporate seasonality attributes as well as to reflect recent
economic or business trends that may affect the collectability of the portfolio. The loss factor is
then applied to the outstanding portfolio at period end to estimate the amount of expected charge
offs and the provision for loan losses required to supports an adequate allowance for loan losses.
The Corporations decision to revise and improve its methodology was made after a thorough
evaluation of the reliability of the revised methodology including a back testing analysis.
Management believes that the revised quantitative methodology provides a more reliable estimate of
probable losses on its existing consumer and consumer finance portfolios.
50
The Corporation considers in its allowance for loan and lease losses, debts modification of terms
that may be identified as Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs), as stated on FASB ASC Topic 310.
This FASB ASC Topic states that a restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring
if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtors financial difficulties,
grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. TDRs represent loans where
concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties that the creditor
would not otherwise consider. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on
the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to
maximize collection. These concessions stem from an agreement between the creditor and the debtor
or are imposed by law or a court. Classification of loan modifications as TDRs involves a degree of
judgment. Indicators that the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties include, for example:
(i) the debtor is currently in default on any of its debt; (ii) the debtor has declared or is in
the process of declaring bankruptcy; (iii) there is significant doubt as to whether the debtor will
continue to be a going concern; (iv) currently, the debtor has securities that have been delisted,
are in the process of being delisted, or are under threat of being delisted from an exchange; and
(v) based on estimates and projections that only encompass the current business capabilities, the
debtor forecasts that its entity-specific cash flows will be insufficient to service the debt (both
interest and principal) in accordance with the contractual terms of the existing agreement through
maturity; and absent the current modification, the debtor cannot obtain funds from sources other
than the existing creditors at an effective interest rate equal to the current market interest rate
for similar debt for a nontroubled debtor. The identification of TDRs is critical in the
determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loans classified as TDRs are
reported in non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the
modification. The TDR loan should continue in non-accrual status until the borrower has
demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (at least six months
of sustained performance after classified as TDR). Loans classified as TDRs are excluded from TDR
status if performance under the restructured terms exists for a reasonable period (at least twelve
months of sustained performance after classified) and the loan yields a market rate. The
Corporation identifies as TDRs and impaired, residential real estate loans whose terms have been
modified under the conditions set forth in FASB ASC Topic 310, as mentioned previously. Although
the accounting codification guidance for specific impairment of a loan excludes large groups of
smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g., mortgage
loans), it specifically requires that loan modifications considered TDRs be analyzed under its
provisions.
For purposes of determining the impairment analysis to be applied on TDRs, the Corporation
stratifies these loans into performing loans and non-performing loans. Impairment measure in
performing loans was based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loans
original contractual rate. The impairment measure on non-performing loans is based on the fair
value of the collateral net of dispositions cost. During 2009, the Corporation restructured $95.1
million residential mortgage loans with allowance for loan losses of $6.1 million.
An additional, or unallocated, reserve is maintained to cover the effect of probable economic
deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the asset-specific component of the allowance.
This component represents managements view that given the complexities of the lending portfolio
and the assessment process, including the inherent imprecision in the financial models used in the
loss forecasting process, there are estimable losses that have been incurred but not yet
specifically identified, and as a result not fully provided for in the asset-specific component of
the allowance. The level of the unallocated reserve may change periodically after evaluating
factors impacting assumptions used in the calculation of the asset specific component of the
reserve.
The underlying assumptions, estimates and assessments used by management to determine the
components of the allowance for loan losses are periodically evaluated and updated to reflect
managements current view of overall economic conditions and other relevant factors impacting
credit quality and inherent losses. Changes in such estimates could significantly impact the
allowance and provision for loan losses. The Corporation could experience loan losses that are
different from the current estimates made by management. Based on current and expected economic
conditions, the expected level of net loan losses and the methodology established to evaluate the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers that the Corporation has established an adequate position in its allowance for loan
losses. Refer to the Non-performing Assets and Past Due Loans section for further information.
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
191,889 |
|
|
$ |
166,952 |
|
|
$ |
106,863 |
|
|
$ |
66,842 |
|
|
$ |
69,177 |
|
Allowance acquired (Island Finance) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
152,496 |
|
|
|
175,523 |
|
|
|
147,824 |
|
|
|
65,583 |
|
|
|
20,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,385 |
|
|
|
342,475 |
|
|
|
254,687 |
|
|
|
167,529 |
|
|
|
89,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses charged to the allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
21,536 |
|
|
|
17,782 |
|
|
|
10,375 |
|
|
|
9,792 |
|
|
|
8,044 |
|
Construction |
|
|
2,459 |
|
|
|
32,257 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Mortage |
|
|
7,340 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
55,565 |
|
|
|
44,682 |
|
|
|
29,281 |
|
|
|
16,679 |
|
|
|
17,351 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
63,322 |
|
|
|
56,444 |
|
|
|
44,484 |
|
|
|
38,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,023 |
|
|
|
154,486 |
|
|
|
91,360 |
|
|
|
66,887 |
|
|
|
27,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
2,463 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortage |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
6,221 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off |
|
|
147,082 |
|
|
|
150,586 |
|
|
|
87,735 |
|
|
|
60,666 |
|
|
|
22,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
197,303 |
|
|
$ |
191,889 |
|
|
$ |
166,952 |
|
|
$ |
106,863 |
|
|
$ |
66,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to year-end loans |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
3.12 |
% |
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.11 |
% |
Recoveries to charge-offs |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
2.52 |
% |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
9.30 |
% |
|
|
18.28 |
% |
Net charge-offs to average loans |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
2.23 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
0.93 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs |
|
|
134.14 |
% |
|
|
127.43 |
% |
|
|
190.29 |
% |
|
|
176.15 |
% |
|
|
294.00 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans |
|
|
68.07 |
% |
|
|
90.21 |
% |
|
|
56.70 |
% |
|
|
100.01 |
% |
|
|
90.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
103.68 |
% |
|
|
116.56 |
% |
|
|
168.49 |
% |
|
|
108.11 |
% |
|
|
89.73 |
% |
Average loans |
|
|
2.67 |
% |
|
|
2.60 |
% |
|
|
2.10 |
% |
|
|
1.00 |
% |
|
|
0.34 |
% |
The Corporation recognized reserves related to unfunded lending commitments and standby letters of
credit from the allowance for the loan losses to other liabilities. Changes in the reserve for
unfunded commitments and standby letters of credit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,835 |
|
|
$ |
1,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,666 |
|
|
$ |
1,269 |
|
Provision (credit) for unfunded lending
commitments and stand by letters of credit |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
1,448 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,835 |
|
|
$ |
1,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
2009 compared to 2008. The Corporations allowance for loan losses was $197.3 million or 3.61% of
period-end loans at December 31, 2009, a 49 basis point increase compared to $191.9 million, or
3.12% of period-end loans at December 31, 2008. The $197.3 million in the allowance for loan losses
is comprised of $133.9 million related to the Bank and $63.4 million related to Island Finance
entity, with a provision for loan losses of $96.4 million and $56.1 million for each respective
segment for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The 49 basis points increment in the ratio of allowance for loan losses to period-end loan for the
year ended December 31, 2009 as compared with the same period in 2008 was driven by $77.1 million
increase in non-performing loans which amounted $289.8 million as of December 31, 2009 versus
$212.7 million as of December 31, 2008. The allowance for loan losses is a current estimate of the
losses inherent in the present portfolio based on managements ongoing quarterly evaluations of the
loan portfolio. On a quarterly basis, the Corporation reviews and evaluates historical loss
experience by loan type, quantitative factors (historical net charge-offs, statistical loss
estimates, etc.) as well as qualitative factors (current economics conditions, portfolio
composition, delinquency trends, industry concentrations, etc.).
The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans and accruing loans past due 90
days or more was 65.5% and 84.8% at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Excluding
non-performing mortgage loans this ratio was 203.7% at December 31, 2009 compared to 194.4% at
December 31, 2008.
The annualized ratio of net charge-offs to average loans for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
2008 was 2.57% and 2.23%, respectively, reflecting an increase of increasing 34 basis points.
2008 compared to 2007. The allowance for loan losses reached $191.9 million as of December 31,
2008, a $24.9 million increase when compared with prior year. The Corporations allowance for loan
losses represented 3.12% of period-end loans at December 31, 2008, a 76 basis points increase over
2.36% reported as of December 31, 2007. At December 31, 2008, the composition of the allowance for
loan losses was of $122.8 million related to the Bank with a provision for loan losses of $119.8
million and $69.1 million related to Island Finance, with a provision for loan losses of $55.7
million.
The ratio of allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 90.21% reflecting an increase of
3,351 percentage points from to 56.70% during the year ended 2007. Excluding non-performing
mortgage loans, this ratio is 225.06% and 82.32% as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The annualized ratio of net charge-off to average loans for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
2.23%, an increase of 98 basis points from 1.25% for the year ended December 31, 2007. Losses
charged to the allowance amounted to $154.5 million in 2008, an increase of $63.1 million when
compared $91.4 million of losses charged to the allowance in 2007 mainly due to an increment in
charge-offs on certain loans sold to an affiliate amounting $34.5 million.
53
Broken down by major loan categories, the allowance for loan losses for each of the five years in
the period ended December 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
category to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
category to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
category to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
category to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
category to |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial |
|
$ |
37,150 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
$ |
36,926 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
$ |
29,883 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
$ |
29,846 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
% |
|
$ |
27,765 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
% |
Construction |
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
15,496 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
23,735 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Consumer |
|
|
56,927 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
46,135 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
33,641 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
20,099 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
30,664 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Consumer Finance |
|
|
63,373 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
% |
|
|
69,128 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
68,359 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
41,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
32,969 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
22,876 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
|
7,379 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
% |
|
|
9,249 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
% |
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
% |
Lease financing |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Unallocated |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
197,303 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
191,889 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
166,952 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
106,863 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
66,842 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the caption Unallocated the Corporation maintains an unallocated reserve for loan losses of
$3.0 million as of December 31, 2009. The unallocated reserve is maintained to cover the effect of
probable economic deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the asset-specific component
of the allowance. This component represents managements view that given the complexities of the
lending portfolio and the assessment process, including the inherent imprecision in the financial
models used in the loss forecasting process, there are estimable losses that have been incurred but
not yet specifically identified, and as a result not fully provided for in the asset-specific
component of the allowance. The level of the unallocated reserve may change periodically after
evaluating factors impacting assumptions used in the calculation of the asset specific component of
the reserve.
At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the portion of the allowance for loan losses related to
impaired loans was $28.8 million, $18.4 million and $25.6 million, respectively. Please refer to
Notes 1 and 5 to the consolidated financial statements for further information.
Liabilities
The principal sources of funding for the Corporation are its equity capital, core deposits from
retail and commercial clients, and wholesale deposits and borrowings raised in the interbank and
commercial markets.
As of December 31, 2009 total liabilities amounted $6.2 billion, $1.2 billion or 16.0% less when
compared to figures reported as of December 31, 2008. This reduction in total liabilities was
principally due to a decrease in total deposits of $619.3 million or 12.4% to $4.4 billion balance
reported as of December 31, 2009 and a decrease in total borrowings (comprised of federal funds
purchased and other borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper
issued, federal home loan advances, term and capital notes) of $432.6 million or 22.3% as of
December 31, 2009 from $1.9 billion at December 31, 2008.
Total deposits of $4.4 billion as of December 31, 2009 were composed of $0.3 billion in brokered
deposits and $4.1 billion of customer deposits. Compared to December 31, 2008, brokered deposits
reflected a decrease of $676.3 million or 69.4% and customer deposits reflected an increase of
$56.9 million as of December 31, 2009.
Total borrowings at December 31, 2009 (comprised of federal funds purchased and other borrowings,
securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper issued, federal home loan bank
advances and term and capital notes) decreased $432.6 million or 22.3% compared to borrowings at
December 31, 2008. This reduction was mainly due to the cancellation of $375 million in securities
sold under agreements to repurchase, $125.0 million decrease in federal home loan bank advances
partially offset by an increase of $48.0 million in federal funds purchased and $16.5 million in
commercial paper issued.
54
On January 22, 2010, the Corporation and Santander Financial Services, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Corporation (Santander Financial), entered into a collateralized loan agreement
(the Loan Agreement) with Banco Santander Puerto Rico (the Bank). Under the Loan Agreement, the
Bank advanced $182 million and $430 million (the Loans) to the Corporation and Santander
Financial, respectively. The proceeds of the Loans were used to refinance the outstanding
indebtedness incurred under a loan agreement dated September 24, 2009 among the Corporation,
Santander Financial and the Bank, and for general corporate purposes. The Loans are collateralized
by a certificate of deposit in the amount of $612 million opened by Banco Santander, S.A., the
parent of the Corporation, at the Bank and provided as security for the Loans pursuant to the terms
of a Security Agreement, Pledge and Assignment between the Bank and Banco Santander, S.A. The
Corporation and Santander Financial have agreed to pay an annual fee of 0.10% net of taxes,
deductions and withholdings to Banco Santander, S.A. in connection with its agreement to
collateralize the Loans with the deposit.
On September 24, 2009, the Corporation and Santander Financial Services, Inc., entered into a
collateralized loan agreement (the Loan Agreement) with Banco Santander Puerto Rico. Under the
Loan Agreement, the Bank advanced $190 million and $440 million (the Loans) to the Corporation
and Santander Financial, respectively. The proceeds of the Loans were used to refinance the
outstanding indebtedness incurred under a loan agreement dated September 24, 2008 among the
Corporation,
Santander Financial and the Bank, and for general corporate purposes. The Loans are collateralized
by a certificate of deposit in the amount of $630 million opened by Banco Santander, S.A., the
parent of the Corporation, at the Bank and provided as security for the Loans pursuant to the terms
of a Security Agreement, Pledge and Assignment between the Bank and Banco Santander, S.A. The
Corporation and Santander Financial have agreed to pay an annual fee of 0.10% net of taxes,
deductions and withholdings to Banco Santander, S.A. in connection with its agreement to
collateralize the Loans with the deposit.
On December 10, 2008, the Bank undertook a Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement with Crefisa, Inc,
(Crefisa), an affiliate, for $60 million due on December 10, 2028 and to pay interest thereon
from December 10, 2008 or from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been
paid or duly provided for, semiannually on the tenth (10th) day of June and the tenth
(10th) of December of each year, commencing on June 10, 2009, at the rate of 7.5% per
annum, until the principal hereof is paid or made available for payment. The interest so payable,
and punctually paid or duly provided for, on any interest payment date will, as provided in such
Note Purchase Agreement, be paid to Crefisa at the close of business on the regular record date for
such interest, which shall be the tenth (10th) day of the month next preceding the
relevant interest payment date.
During October 2006, the Corporation completed the private placement of $125 million Trust
Preferred Securities (Preferred Securities) and issued Junior Subordinated Debentures in the
aggregate principal amount of $129 million in connection with the issuance of the Preferred
Securities. The Preferred Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (to the extent
described in the guarantee agreement between the Corporation and the guarantee trustee, for the
benefit of the holders from time to time of the Preferred Securities) by the Corporation. The Trust
Preferred Securities were acquired by an affiliate of the Corporation. In connection with the
issuance of the Preferred Securities, the Corporation issued an aggregate principal amount of
$129,000,000 of its 7.00% Junior Subordinated Debentures, Series A, due July 1, 2037.
The following table sets forth the Corporations average daily balance of liabilities for the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 by source, together with the average interest rates paid
thereon.
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Savings deposits |
|
$ |
1,817,911 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
$ |
1,691,094 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
2.07 |
% |
|
$ |
1,715,631 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
|
3.02 |
% |
Time deposits |
|
|
2,136,437 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
% |
|
|
2.83 |
% |
|
|
3,135,260 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
% |
|
|
3.75 |
% |
|
|
2,820,495 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
4.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
3,954,348 |
|
|
|
60.4 |
% |
|
|
2.01 |
% |
|
|
4,826,354 |
|
|
|
59.0 |
% |
|
|
3.16 |
% |
|
|
4,536,126 |
|
|
|
52.6 |
% |
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds, repos, and
commercial paper and other borrowings |
|
|
1,240,099 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
2,047,442 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
|
2,805,003 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
5.49 |
% |
Term and subordinated notes |
|
|
325,884 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.71 |
% |
|
|
267,093 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
5.22 |
% |
|
|
284,944 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
6.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings |
|
|
1,565,983 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
2,314,535 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
3,089,947 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
|
5.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
5,520,331 |
|
|
|
84.4 |
% |
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
7,140,889 |
|
|
|
87.3 |
% |
|
|
3.42 |
% |
|
|
7,626,073 |
|
|
|
88.4 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
691,482 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
732,314 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
685,875 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Other liabilities |
|
|
331,241 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
303,229 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
310,228 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,022,723 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
1,035,543 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
996,103 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
6,543,054 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
1.99 |
% |
|
$ |
8,176,432 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
$ |
8,622,176 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables set forth additional details on the Corporations average deposit base
for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
Average Total Deposits |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Private Demand |
|
$ |
690,924 |
|
|
$ |
731,645 |
|
|
$ |
684,922 |
|
Public Demand |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing |
|
|
691,482 |
|
|
|
732,314 |
|
|
|
685,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings Accounts |
|
|
739,901 |
|
|
|
641,970 |
|
|
|
657,044 |
|
NOW and Super NOW accounts |
|
|
474,364 |
|
|
|
417,654 |
|
|
|
401,104 |
|
Government NOW accounts |
|
|
603,646 |
|
|
|
631,470 |
|
|
|
657,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Savings Accounts |
|
|
1,817,911 |
|
|
|
1,691,094 |
|
|
|
1,715,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $100,000 |
|
|
219,543 |
|
|
|
273,409 |
|
|
|
262,561 |
|
$100,000 and over |
|
|
1,916,894 |
|
|
|
2,861,851 |
|
|
|
2,557,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Time Deposits |
|
|
2,136,437 |
|
|
|
3,135,260 |
|
|
|
2,820,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Bearing Deposits |
|
|
3,954,348 |
|
|
|
4,826,354 |
|
|
|
4,536,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits |
|
$ |
4,645,830 |
|
|
$ |
5,558,668 |
|
|
$ |
5,222,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations most important source of funding is its customer deposits. Total average deposits
reached $4.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of 16.4% compared with
figures reported in 2008. Average interest-bearing deposits decreased $872.0 million or 18.1% to
$4.0 billion as of December 31, 2009, which includes a decrease in average other time deposits of
$998.8 million or 31.9% offset by an increase of $126.8 million in average savings and Now accounts
when compared with the figures reported in prior year. Average non-interest bearing deposits are
the least expensive sources of funding used by Corporation and represent 10.6%, 9.0% and 8.0% of
the Corporation average total liabilities for the years
56
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively Total average deposits represented 71.0%, 68.0% and 60.6% of the total average
liabilities of the Corporation as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporations customer deposits (average balance)
consisted of $691.5 million in non interest-bearing-checking accounts and $4.0 billion of
interest-bearing deposits. The decrease in average interest-bearing deposits was primarily in time
deposits greater than $100,000, which reflected a decrease of $945.0 million or 33.0%.
The following table sets forth the maturities of time deposits of $100,000 or more as of December
31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
1,156,944 |
|
|
$ |
702,292 |
|
|
$ |
1,105,405 |
|
Over three months through six months |
|
|
180,450 |
|
|
|
397,697 |
|
|
|
365,957 |
|
Over six months through twelve months |
|
|
90,064 |
|
|
|
1,000,911 |
|
|
|
79,576 |
|
Over twelve months |
|
|
76,303 |
|
|
|
261,580 |
|
|
|
948,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,503,761 |
|
|
$ |
2,362,480 |
|
|
$ |
2,499,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations current funding strategy is to continue to use various alternative funding
sources taking into account their relative cost, their availability and the general asset and
liability management strategy of the Corporation, placing a stronger emphasis on obtaining client
deposits and reducing reliance on borrowings maintaining adequate levels of liquidity and to meet
funding requirements.
For further information regarding the Corporations deposits and borrowings, see Notes 11 and 12 to
the consolidated financial statements.
Capital and Dividends
The Corporation does not expect favorable or unfavorable trends that would materially affect our
capital resources.
As an investment-grade rated entity by several nationally recognized rating agencies, the
Corporation has access to a variety of capital issuance alternatives in the United States and
Puerto Rico capital markets. The Corporation continuously monitors its capital raising
alternatives. The Corporation may issue additional capital in the future, as needed, to maintain
its well-capitalized status.
Stockholders equity was $595.9 million or 8.8% of total assets at December 31, 2009, compared to
$551.6 million or 7.0% of total assets at December 31, 2008. The $44.3 million change in
stockholders equity was composed by net income of $41.3 million, stock incentive plan expense
recognized as capital contribution of $1.1 million, net of payment to ultimate parent, for the
period, an increase in minimum pension benefits of $5.0 million. These increases were offset by an
increase of $3.1 million of unrealized loss on investment securities available for sale, net of
tax, included in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
The Corporation declared a cash dividend of $0.20 and $0.64 per common share during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The current annualized dividend yield is 1.6% and 7.4%
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In light of the continuing
challenging general economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the global capital markets, the Board of
Directors of the Corporation voted during August 2008 to discontinue the payment of the quarterly
cash dividend on the Corporations common stock to strengthen the institutions core capital
position. The Corporation may use a portion of the funds previously paid as dividends to reduce its
outstanding debt. The Corporations decision is part of the significant actions it has proactively
taken in order to face the on-going challenges presented by the Puerto Rico economy. While each of
the Corporation and its banking subsidiary remain above well capitalized ratios, these prudent
measures will preserve and continue to reinforce the Corporations capital position.
The Corporation adopted and implemented various Stock Repurchase Programs in May 2000, December
2000 and June 2002. Under these programs the Corporation acquired 3% of the then outstanding
common shares. During November 2002, the Corporation started a fourth Stock Repurchase program
under which it may acquire 3% of its outstanding common shares. In November 2002, the Board of
Directors authorized the Corporation to repurchase up to 928,204 shares, or approximately 3%,
57
of
its shares of outstanding common stock. The Board felt that the Corporations shares of common
stock represented an attractive investment at prevailing market prices at the time of the adoption
of the common stock repurchase program and that, given the relatively small amount of the program,
the stock repurchases would not have a significant impact on liquidity and capital positions. The
program has no time limitation and management is authorized to effect repurchases at its
discretion. The authorization permits the Corporation to repurchase shares from time to time in the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and amount of any repurchases will
depend on many factors, including the Corporations capital structure, the market price of the
common stock and overall market conditions. All of the repurchased shares will be held by the
Corporation as treasury stock and reserved for future issuance for general corporate purposes.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation did not repurchase any
shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had repurchased 4,011,260 shares
of its common stock under these programs at a cost of $67.6 million. Management believes that the
repurchase program has not had a significant effect on the Corporations liquidity and capital
positions.
The Corporation has a Dividend Reinvestment Plan and a Cash Purchase Plan wherein holders of common
stock have the opportunity to automatically invest cash dividends to purchase more shares of the
Corporations common stock. Shareholders may also make, as frequently as once a month, optional
cash payments for investment in additional shares of the Corporations common stock.
Up to December 31, 2009, the 4thquarter of 2009, the Corporations stock price traded
consistently below (from $9.58 to $13.12) the book value per share of $12.78 as of December 31,
2009. This is mainly attributed to the current condition of the worldwide and Puerto Rico economy
which has affected the stock market, where all stocks and specially the ones in the financial
sector both in Puerto Rico and the United States have experienced a depression in price. Also, the
Corporations stock experienced a limited float, due to 91% were owned by Santander SA. These
situations impact a relatively small changes or trends in volume triggers a significant impact in
the share price.
On December 14, 2009, Banco Santander, S.A. announced by press release that it intends to commence
a cash tender offer through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Administración de Bancos Latinoamericanos
Santander, S.L., for all outstanding publicly-held shares of common stock of the Corporation at
$12.25 per share. Banco Santander S.A, which currently owns 90.6% of the outstanding shares of the
Corporation, commenced the tender offer during the first quarter of 2010. As soon as reasonably
practicable after the consummation of the offer Banco Santander S.A. intends to consummate a
short-form merger with the Corporation in which all remaining public stockholders will receive the
same price per share as was paid in the offer, without interest. The commencement and completion of
the tender offer does not require any approval by the board of directors of the Corporation and
Banco Santander, S.A has not asked the board of directors of the Corporation to approve the tender
offer. The Corporations board of directors is evaluating the terms of the proposed offer and has
not taken a position with respect to the offer. The complete terms, conditions and other details of
the tender offer will be contained in materials filed by Banco Santander S. A. with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission when the offer commences.
The Corporation is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal
banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and
possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on the Corporations consolidated financial statements. The regulations require
the Corporation to meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. The Corporations capital classification is also subject to qualitative judgments by
the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
The Corporations common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and on the Madrid
Stock Exchange (LATIBEX). The symbol on the NYSE and on the LATIBEX for the common stock is SBP
and XSBP, respectively. There were approximately 110 holders of record of the Corporations
common stock as of December 31, 2009, not including beneficial owners whose shares are held in
names of brokers or other nominees.
As of December 31, 2009, the Bank was classified as a well capitalized institution under the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. At December 31, 2009, the Corporation continued
to exceed the regulatory risk-based capital requirements. Tier I capital to risk-adjusted assets
and total capital ratios of the Corporation at December 31, 2009 were 10.60% and 15.55%,
respectively, and the leverage ratio was 7.98%. Refer to notes 1 and 26 in the consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Adequacy Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be Well Capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Minimum Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequacy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Action Provision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Must be |
|
|
Must be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Must be |
|
|
Must be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santander BanCorp |
|
$ |
765,629 |
|
|
|
15.55 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
$ |
393,865 |
|
|
|
³8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
686,964 |
|
|
|
15.60 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
352,244 |
|
|
|
³8.00 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
$ |
440,305 |
|
|
|
³10.00 |
% |
Tier I (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santander BanCorp |
|
|
521,842 |
|
|
|
10.60 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
196,932 |
|
|
|
³4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
571,380 |
|
|
|
12.98 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
176,122 |
|
|
|
³4.00 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
264,183 |
|
|
|
³6.00 |
% |
Leverage (to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santander BanCorp |
|
|
521,842 |
|
|
|
7.98 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
196,075 |
|
|
|
³3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
571,380 |
|
|
|
8.77 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
195,403 |
|
|
|
³3.00 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
325,672 |
|
|
|
>5.00 |
% |
December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santander BanCorp |
|
$ |
726,863 |
|
|
|
12.83 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
$ |
453,114 |
|
|
|
³8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
662,161 |
|
|
|
12.87 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
411,725 |
|
|
|
³8.00 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
$ |
514,656 |
|
|
|
³10.00 |
% |
Tier I (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santander BanCorp |
|
|
476,268 |
|
|
|
8.41 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
226,557 |
|
|
|
³4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
537,395 |
|
|
|
10.44 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
205,863 |
|
|
|
³4.00 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
308,795 |
|
|
|
³6.00 |
% |
Leverage (to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santander BanCorp |
|
|
476,268 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
234,278 |
|
|
|
³3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
537,395 |
|
|
|
6.88 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
234,488 |
|
|
|
³3.00 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
390,813 |
|
|
|
>5.00 |
% |
December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santander BanCorp |
|
$ |
697,009 |
|
|
|
10.55 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
$ |
528,134 |
|
|
|
³8.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
647,482 |
|
|
|
10.91 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
474,647 |
|
|
|
³8.00 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
$ |
593,309 |
|
|
|
³10.00 |
% |
Tier I (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santander BanCorp |
|
|
490,259 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
264,067 |
|
|
|
³4.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
573,022 |
|
|
|
9.66 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
237,324 |
|
|
|
³4.00 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
355,986 |
|
|
|
³6.00 |
% |
Leverage (to average assets) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santander BanCorp |
|
|
490,259 |
|
|
|
5.38 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
273,297 |
|
|
|
³3.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
Banco Santander Puerto Rico |
|
|
573,022 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
251,493 |
|
|
|
³3.00 |
% |
|
|
³ |
|
|
|
419,155 |
|
|
|
>5.00 |
% |
59
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Total goodwill and intangibles at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Mortgage Servicing Rights |
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
Advisory Servicing Rights |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Trade Name |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
Non-compete Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Goodwill: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Banking |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Wealth Management |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150.5 |
|
|
$ |
151.4 |
|
|
$ |
151.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and intangible assets were $121.5 million and $28.9 million at December 31, 2009.
Mortgage-servicing rights arise from the right to service mortgages sold and have an estimated
useful life of eight years. The advisory-servicing rights are related to the Corporations
subsidiary acquisition of the right to serve as the investment advisor for First Puerto Rico
Tax-Exempt Fund, Inc. acquired in 2002 and for First Puerto Rico Growth and Income Fund Inc. and
First Puerto Rico Daily Liquidity Fund Inc. acquired in December 2006. These intangible assets are
being amortized over a 10-year estimated useful life. Trade name is related to the acquisition of
Island Finance and has an indefinite useful life and is therefore not being amortized but is tested
for impairment at least annually. Non-compete agreement was intangible asset related to the
acquisition of Island Finance. The non-compete agreement has been fully amortized.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
As disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation has various
financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial commitments, which require
future cash payments on debt and lease agreements. Also, in the normal course of business, the
Corporation enters into contractual agreements whereby it commits to future purchases of products
or services from third parties. Obligations that are legally binding agreements, whereby the
Corporation agrees to purchase products or services with a specific minimum quantity defined a
fixed minimum or variable price over a specified period of time, are defined as purchases
obligations. At December 31, 2009, the aggregate contractual cash obligations, including purchases
obligations and borrowings maturities, were:
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by Period |
|
|
|
as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Contractual Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and
other borrowings |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
67,482 |
|
|
|
67,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances |
|
|
1,060,000 |
|
|
|
735,000 |
|
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated notes |
|
|
308,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,691 |
|
Term notes |
|
|
20,581 |
|
|
|
4,802 |
|
|
|
6,697 |
|
|
|
9,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
122,406 |
|
|
|
30,933 |
|
|
|
22,154 |
|
|
|
18,970 |
|
|
|
50,349 |
|
Pension plan contribution |
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,630,526 |
|
|
$ |
889,583 |
|
|
$ |
353,851 |
|
|
$ |
28,052 |
|
|
$ |
359,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment and expiration period |
|
|
|
as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Other Commercial Commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit and
financial guarantees written |
|
|
41,837 |
|
|
|
40,612 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
|
1,218,115 |
|
|
|
1,218,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,259,952 |
|
|
$ |
1,258,727 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of each of the
pronouncements and managements assessment as to the impact of the adoptions.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Risk Management
The Corporation has specific policies and procedures which structure and delineate the management
of risks, particularly those related to credit, interest rate exposure and liquidity risk. Risks
are identified, measured and monitored through various committees including the Asset and
Liability, Credit and Investment Committees, among others.
Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality
The lending activity of the Corporation represents its core function, and as such, the quality and
effectiveness of the loan origination and credit risk areas are imperative to management for the
growth and success of the Corporation. The importance of the Corporations lending activity has
been considered when establishing functional responsibilities, organizational reporting, lending
policies and procedures, and various monitoring processes and controls.
Critical risk management responsibilities include establishing sound lending standards, monitoring
the quality of the loan portfolio, establishing loan rating systems, assessing reserves and loan
concentrations, supervising document control and accounting, providing necessary training and
resources to credit officers, implementing lending policies and loan documentation procedures,
identifying problem loans as early as possible, and instituting procedures to ensure appropriate
actions to comply with laws and regulations. Due to the challenging environment, the Corporation
implemented during 2006 more stringent underwriting and lending criteria.
Credit risk management for our portfolio begins with initial underwriting and continues throughout
the borrowers credit cycle. Experiential judgment in conjunction with statistical techniques are
used in all aspects of portfolio management including underwriting, product pricing, risk appetite,
setting credit limits, operating processes and metrics to quantify balance risks and returns. In
addition to judgmental decisions, statistical models are used for credit decisions. Tolerance
levels are set to decrease the percentage of approvals as the risk profile increases. Statistical
models are based on detailed behavioral information from external sources such as credit bureaus
and/or internal historical experience. These models are an integral part of our credit management
process and are used in the assessment of both new and existing credit decisions, portfolio
management, strategies including authorizations and line management, collection practices and
strategies and determination of the allowance for credit losses.
The Corporation has also established an internal risk rating system and internal classifications
which serve as timely identification of potential deterioration in loan quality attributes in the
loan portfolio.
Credit extensions for commercial loans are approved by credit committees including the Small Loan
Credit Committee, the Regional Credit Committee, the Credit Administration Committee, the
Management Credit Committee, and the Board of Directors Credit Committee. A centralized department
of the Consumer Lending Division approves all consumer loans.
The Corporations collateral requirements for loans depend on the financial strength and liquidity
of the prospective borrower and the principal amount and term of the proposed financing.
Acceptable collateral includes cash, marketable securities, mortgages on real and personal
property, accounts receivable, and inventory.
In addition, the Corporation has an independent Loan Review Department and an independent Internal
Audit Division, each of which conducts monitoring and evaluation of loan portfolio quality, loan
administration, and other related activities, carried on as part of the Corporations lending
activity. Both departments provide periodic reports to the Board of Directors, continuously assess
the validity of information reported to the Board of Directors and maintain compliance with
established lending policies.
62
The following table provides the composition of the Corporations loan portfolio as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
1,947,809 |
|
|
$ |
2,165,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer banking operations |
|
|
443,567 |
|
|
|
565,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Installment Loans |
|
|
504,054 |
|
|
|
686,277 |
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
|
279,456 |
|
|
|
310,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783,510 |
|
|
|
996,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing |
|
|
36,624 |
|
|
|
64,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction |
|
|
70,879 |
|
|
|
194,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans |
|
|
2,385,592 |
|
|
|
2,553,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
5,667,981 |
|
|
|
6,540,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned income and deferred fees/cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking operations |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
Consumer finance |
|
|
(224,562 |
) |
|
|
(418,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loans losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking operations |
|
|
(133,930 |
) |
|
|
(122,761 |
) |
Consumer finance |
|
|
(63,373 |
) |
|
|
(69,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,246,444 |
|
|
$ |
5,929,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations gross loan portfolio as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $5.7
billion and $6.5 billion respectively, which represented 92.5% and 90.9%, respectively, of the
Corporations total earning assets. The loan portfolio is distributed among various types of
credit, including commercial business loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans,
small business loans, consumer lending and residential mortgage loans. The credit risk exposure
provides for diversification among specific industries, specific types of business, and related
individuals. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, there was no obligor group that represented more
than 2.5% of the Corporations total loan portfolio. Obligors resident or having a principal place
of business in Puerto Rico comprised approximately 99% of the Corporations loan portfolio.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had over 312,000 and 379,000 consumer loan
customers, respectively, and over 8,000 and 7,000 commercial loan customers, respectively, As of
such dates, the Corporation had 44 and 50 clients with commercial loans outstanding over $10.0
million, respectively. Although the Corporation has generally avoided cross-border loans, the
Corporation had approximately $11.7 and $31.3 million in cross-border loans as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively, which are collateralized with real estate in the United States of America,
cash and marketable securities.
The Corporation uses an underwriting system for the origination of residential mortgage loans.
These loans are fully underwritten by experienced underwriters. The methodology used in
underwriting the extension of credit for each residential mortgage loan employs objective
mathematical principles which relate the mortgagors income, assets, and liabilities to the
proposed payment and such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination
(application/approval) the borrower had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the residential mortgage loan. Also
the character of the borrower or willingness to pay is evaluated by analyzing the credit report. We
apply the basic principles of the borrowers willingness and ability to pay.
The risk involved with a loan decision is kept in perspective and must be considered in the
analysis of a loan. Certain characteristics of the transaction are indicators of risk such as
occupancy, loan amount, purpose, product type, property type, loan amount size in relation to
borrowers previous credit depth and loan to value, cash out of the transaction, time of occupancy,
etc. Risk will be mitigated, in part, by requiring a higher equity, risk pricing, additional
documentation and obtaining and documenting compensating factors.
63
The purpose of mortgage credit analysis is to determine the borrowers ability and willingness to
repay the mortgage debt, and thus, limit the probability of default or collection difficulties.
There are four major elements which, typically, are evaluated in assessing a borrowers ability and
willingness to repay the mortgage debt and the property to determine it complies with the agency
and investors requirement, has marketability, and is a sound collateral for the loan. The elements
above mentioned comprised (1) stability documentation, (2) continuity and adequacy of income, (3)
credit and assets and (4) collateral.
The Corporation follows the established guidelines and requirements for all government insured or
guaranteed loans such as FHA, VA, RURAL, PR government products, as well as conforming loans sold
to FHLMC and FNMA. In addition to conforming loans and government insured or guaranteed loans, we
also provide loans designed to offer an alternative to individuals who do not qualify for an Agency
conforming mortgage loan. These non-conforming loans typically have: (1) LTV higher than 80% with
mortgage insurance or additional collateral; (2) the mortgage amount may exceed the FNMA/FHLMC
limits and (3) may have different documentation requirements.
The Corporations underwriting policies take into consideration the worsening macroeconomic
conditions in PR. The implementation of more tight underwriting standards to reduce the exposure
of risks, has contributed to a significant reduction of mortgage loans originations, and to improve
the credit quality of our portfolio. These underwriting criteria reflect the Corporations effort
to minimize the impact of the local recession on its overall loan portfolio, including its mortgage
business and protect the value of its franchise from the higher risk levels caused by declining
assets quality.
Residential real estate mortgages are one of the Corporations core products and pursuant to our
credit management strategy the Corporation offers a broad range of alternatives of this product to
borrowers that are considered mostly prime or near prime or Band C (borrowers with Fair Isaac
Corporation (Fico Scores) of 620 or less among other factors including income and its source,
nature and location of collateral, loan-to-value and other guarantees, if any). Near prime or Band
C lending policies and procedures do not differ from our general residential mortgages and
consumer lending policies and procedures to other customers. The concentration of residential
mortgages loans of the Bank are presented in the followings tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Vintage |
|
|
Non-performing |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
% of total |
|
|
loans |
|
|
total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vintage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
50,615 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
51,000 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
108,939 |
|
|
|
1,567 |
|
|
|
110,506 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
252,133 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
254,661 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13,768 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
528,486 |
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
|
532,309 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
43,390 |
|
|
|
8.15 |
% |
2005 |
|
|
554,696 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
555,224 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
40,410 |
|
|
|
7.28 |
% |
2004 and earlier |
|
|
879,490 |
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
881,892 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
49,028 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub- Total |
|
$ |
2,374,359 |
|
|
$ |
11,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,385,592 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
148,712 |
|
|
|
6.23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Vintage |
|
|
Non-performing |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
% of total |
|
|
loans |
|
|
total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vintage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
106,836 |
|
|
$ |
2,359 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
109,195 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
638 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
269,220 |
|
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,766 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
578,086 |
|
|
|
4,319 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
582,593 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
32,198 |
|
|
|
5.53 |
% |
2005 |
|
|
604,142 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,778 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
24,251 |
|
|
|
4.01 |
% |
2004 |
|
|
439,674 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,161 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
16,256 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
2003 and earlier |
|
|
543,044 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
544,835 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
22,953 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub- Total |
|
$ |
2,541,002 |
|
|
$ |
11,925 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
2,553,328 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
101,997 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation originates mortgage loans through three main channels: retail sales force, licensed
real estate brokers and purchases from third parties. The production originated through the retail
sales force represent 59% and 44% of the total mortgage originations for the years ended December
31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Corporation performed strict quality control reviews of third
party originated loans, which represented 41% and 56% of the total originated mortgage portfolio
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The Corporation offered fixed rate first and second
mortgages which are almost entirely secured by a primary residence for the purpose of purchase
money, refinance, debt consolidation, or home equity loans. Residential real estate mortgages of
banking operations represent approximately 42% and 39% of total gross loans at December 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the first mortgage portfolio totaled
approximately $2.4 billion and $2.5 billion, while the second mortgage portfolio was approximately
$11.2 million and $11.9 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, from banking
operations.
The Corporation has not originated option adjustable-rate mortgage products (option ARMs) or
variable-rate mortgage products with fixed payment amounts, commonly referred to within the
financial services industry as negative amortizing mortgage loans, as the Corporation believes
these products rarely provide a benefit to our customers. The interest rates impact the amount and
timing of origination and servicing fees because consumer demand for new mortgages and the level of
refinancing activity are sensitive to changes in mortgage interest rates. The ARMs currently
outstanding in the residential mortgage portfolio came from previous acquisitions made by the
Corporation. The Corporation also mitigated its credit risk in its residential mortgage loan
portfolio through sales and securitizations transactions.
The mortgage real estate loans in the Corporations consumer finance subsidiary Santander Financial
Services, Inc. (Island Finance) are presented in the followings tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
ARM |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Vintage |
|
|
Non-performing |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
Mortgage* |
|
|
% of total |
|
|
loans |
|
|
total loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vintage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
13,810 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,931 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
2008 |
|
|
28,033 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,411 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
8.06 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
24,811 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
26,942 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
9.16 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
12,299 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
20,557 |
|
|
|
33,755 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
4,545 |
|
|
|
13.46 |
% |
2005 |
|
|
10,824 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
17,151 |
|
|
|
29,054 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
9.60 |
% |
2004 and earlier |
|
|
21,457 |
|
|
|
6,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,526 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
15.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
111,234 |
|
|
$ |
9,598 |
|
|
$ |
38,787 |
|
|
$ |
159,619 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
16,255 |
|
|
|
10.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net of unearned finance charges and deferred income/cost |
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
ARM |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Vintage |
|
|
Non-performing |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
mortgage |
|
|
Mortgage* |
|
|
% of total |
|
|
loans |
|
|
total loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Vintage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
31,441 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,137 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
% |
2007 |
|
|
28,323 |
|
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
31,067 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
% |
2006 |
|
|
13,409 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
22,355 |
|
|
|
37,045 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
3,196 |
|
|
|
8.63 |
% |
2005 |
|
|
12,208 |
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
19,953 |
|
|
|
33,380 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
3,014 |
|
|
|
9.03 |
% |
2004 |
|
|
11,524 |
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,632 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
12.14 |
% |
2003 and earlier |
|
|
13,129 |
|
|
|
6,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,314 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
11.18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
110,034 |
|
|
$ |
13,987 |
|
|
$ |
43,554 |
|
|
$ |
167,575 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
10,980 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net of unearned finance charges and deferred income/cost |
The Corporation originates loans to near prime or Band C borrowers (customers with Fair Isaac
Corporation (FICO) scores of 620 or less among other factors, including level of income and its
source, loan-to-value (LTV), other guarantees and banking relationships and nature and location of
collateral, if any,). The following table provides information on the Corporations residential
mortgage and consumer installments loans exposure from banking operations and consumer finance
business, including near prime or Band C loans at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
BAND A |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
BAND B |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
BAND C |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
|
FICO>=660 |
|
|
LTV |
|
|
FICO>620 and <660 |
|
|
LTV |
|
|
FICO<=620 |
|
|
LTV |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
LTV |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Mortgage Loan Portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Operations |
|
$ |
1,514,980 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
|
$ |
251,166 |
|
|
|
70 |
% |
|
$ |
619,446 |
|
|
|
73 |
% |
|
$ |
2,385,592 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Consumer Finance |
|
|
68,339 |
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
39,437 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
51,843 |
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
159,619 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,583,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
290,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
671,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,545,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Installment Loans*: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Operations |
|
$ |
284,635 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
53,808 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
105,124 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
443,567 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
187,747 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
109,654 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
101,710 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
399,111 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
472,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
163,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
206,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
842,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net of unearned finance charges and deferred income/cost |
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
BAND A |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
BAND B |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
BAND C |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
|
FICO>=660 |
|
|
LTV |
|
|
FICO>620 and <660 |
|
|
LTV |
|
|
FICO<=620 |
|
|
LTV |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
LTV |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loan Portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Operations |
|
$ |
1,984,652 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
$ |
308,690 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
$ |
259,986 |
|
|
|
76 |
% |
|
$ |
2,553,328 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
Consumer Finance |
|
|
65,516 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
41,652 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
60,407 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
167,575 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,050,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
350,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
320,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,720,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Installment Loans*: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Operations |
|
$ |
427,056 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
59,070 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
79,707 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
565,833 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
176,334 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
119,492 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
114,842 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
410,668 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
603,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
178,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
194,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
976,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Net of unearned finance charges and deferred income/cost |
At December 31, 2009, residential mortgage portfolio categorized as near prime or Band C loans
was approximately $619.4 million and $51.8 million for banking operations and consumer finance
business, respectively, a 26% and 32% of its total residential mortgage portfolio, respectively.
The mortgage loans amounts reported in Band C as of December 31, 2009 includes $5.1 million or
1.0% of originated loans during the year for banking operations and $2.9 million or 5.6% for
consumer finance portfolio. At December 31, 2008, residential mortgage portfolio categorized as
near prime or Band C loans was approximately $260 million and $60 million for banking operations
and consumer finance business, respectively, a 10% and 36% of its total residential mortgage
portfolio, respectively. The mortgage loans amounts reported in Band C as of December 31, 2008
includes $5.3 million or 1.5% of originated loans during the year for banking operations and $7.9
million or 13% for consumer finance portfolio.
The Corporations risk management considers a FICO credit score, an indicator of credit rating
and credit profile, and loan-to value ratios, the proportional lending exposure relative to
property value, as a key determinant of credit performance. The average FICO score for the
residential mortgage portfolio of banking operations, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was 677 and
706, respectively and an average LTV of 72% as compared to 80% as of December 31, 2008. For its
consumer finance business residential mortgages, average FICO score, as of December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 was 643 and 648, respectively and an average LTV of 66% as of December 31, 2009
as compared to 61% as of December 31, 2008. The actual rates of delinquencies, foreclosures and
losses on these loans could be higher than anticipated during economic slowdowns.
Residential mortgage loan origination for banking operations was $195.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and $345.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The Corporation sold and
securitized $169.5 million and $213.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, to third parties. Within the sales and securitizations numbers mentioned above, the
Corporation sold and securitized $7.7 million and $18.8 million of near prime or Band C loans for
the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Corporation added strength to the control over its credit activities and does not pursue near
prime or Band C residential mortgage and consumer installment as a core product of its lending
activities. Under the Loss Mitigation Policy (LMP), the Corporation evaluates several
alternatives for identifying near prime or Band C residential mortgage loan borrowers who are at
risk of default in order to design and offer loan mitigation strategies, including repayment plans
and loan modifications to such borrowers. The objective of the Loss Mitigation Policy is to
document the approach to loss mitigation manage and reduce the risk of loss for the consumer and
mortgage portfolios and takes into consideration the current stress that consumer and mortgage
borrowers are facing in Puerto Rico. The Corporations strategy is to maximize the recovery from
delinquent and past due consumer and mortgage loans by actively working with borrowers to develop
repayment plans that avoid foreclosure or other legal remedies.
The policy applies to the Corporations consumer lending business, including personal loans, credit
cards and credit lines and mortgage business including conforming, guaranteed & insured mortgages
and non-conforming mortgages. Loss mitigation, where applicable, is intended to benefit both the
Corporation and the borrower. The Corporation avoids a costly and time consuming foreclosure
process while the borrower maintains ownership of his/her home. The Loss Mitigation Policy
describes
67
the Corporations approach to identifying borrowers with higher risk of default,
assessing their ability to pay taking into account various factors, including debt to income
ratios; assessing the likelihood of default; explore loss mitigation techniques that might avoid
foreclose or other legal remedies and ensuring compliance with the appropriate regulations and
policies of each regulatory or investment agency.
During 2009, the Corporation has restructured residential real estate loans and commercial loans
whose terms have been modified and was already identified as a Trouble Debt Restructuring (TDRs),
as stated on FASB ASC Topic 310, Receivables. This FASB ASC Topic states that a restructuring of
a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons
related to the debtors financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not
otherwise consider. Once a loan is determined to be a TDR, then various effects must be
considered, such as: identifying the loan as impaired, performing an impairment analysis, applying
proper revenue recognition accounting, and reviewing its regulatory credit risk grading. Total
restructured loans under this program amounted $95.1 million as of December 31, 2009. Refer to the
Allowance for Loan Losses section for further information.
Industry Risk
Commercial loans, including commercial real estate and construction loans, amounted to $2.1 million
as of December 31, 2009. The Corporation accepts various types of collateral to guarantee specific
loan obligations. As of December 31, 2009, the use of real estate as loan collateral has resulted
in a portfolio of approximately $1.2 billion, or 57.5% of the commercial loan portfolio. In
addition, as of such date, loans secured by cash collateral and marketable securities amounted to
$209.2 million, or 10.2% of the commercial loan portfolio. Commercial loans guaranteed by federal
or local government amounted to $153.4 million as of December 31, 2009, which represents 7.5% of
the commercial loan portfolio. The remaining commercial loan portfolio had $85.9 million partially
secured by other types of collateral including, among others, equipment, accounts receivable, and
inventory. As of December 31, 2009, unsecured commercial loans represented $425.3 million or 20.7%
of commercial loans receivable; however, the majority of these loans were backed by personal
guarantees.
In addition to the commercial loan portfolio indicated above, as of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation had $1.2 billion in unused commitments under commercial lines of credit. These credit
facilities are typically structured to mature within one year. As of December 31, 2009, stand-by
letters of credit amounted to $41.8 million.
The commercial loan portfolio is distributed among the different economic sectors and there are no
concentrations of credit consisting of direct, indirect, or contingent obligations in any specific
borrower, an affiliated group of borrowers, or borrowers engaged in or dependent on one industry.
The Corporation provides for periodic reviews of industry trends and the credits susceptibility to
external factors.
Government Risk
As of December 31, 2009, $181.1 million of the Corporations investment securities represented
exposure to the U.S. government in the form of U.S. Treasury securities and federal agency
obligations. In addition, as of such date, $37.6 million of residential mortgages and $40.4
million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies
through the Small Business Administration (SBA) and Rural Development Programs. Furthermore, as of
December 31, 2009, there were $83.4 million of investment securities representing obligations of
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, its agencies, instrumentalities and political subdivisions as well
as $7.1 million of mortgage loans and $318.8 million in
commercial loans issued to or guaranteed by Puerto Rico government agencies, instrumentalities,
political subdivisions and municipalities. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporations credit
exposure to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its political subdivisions and municipalities was
$409.3 million composed of $141.1 million in municipalities loans, $184.8 million in other
government credit facilities and $83.4 million in outstanding bonds and other obligations. The
Corporation believes that the credit exposure to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its political
subdivisions and municipalities is manageable. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico has a long-standing
record of supporting all of its debt obligations. It has never defaulted in the payment of
principal or interest on any public debt. The Corporations level of exposure is manageable given
the fact that its outstanding loans and investment securities have either one or more of the
following characteristics: (i) investment grade rated counterparties, (ii) identifiable source of
repayment, (iii) high ranking in repayment priority or (iv) tangible collateral. The Corporation
has $141.1 million on loans or obligations to various Municipalities for which payments are secured
by the full faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the Municipalities. The Corporation
anticipates recovery of the amortized cost of these securities at maturity. Since the Corporation
has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be
maturity, and the contractual term of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the
securities at a price less than the amortized cost, the Corporation does not consider these
investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2009.
68
Non-performing Assets and Past Due Loans
The following table sets forth non-performing assets as of December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and
2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial, Industrial and Agricultural |
|
$ |
31,021 |
|
|
$ |
30,564 |
|
|
$ |
21,236 |
|
|
$ |
15,549 |
|
|
$ |
14,326 |
|
Construction |
|
|
15,571 |
|
|
|
13,856 |
|
|
|
141,140 |
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
3,414 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
186,202 |
|
|
|
116,473 |
|
|
|
80,805 |
|
|
|
51,341 |
|
|
|
45,292 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
10,385 |
|
|
|
13,479 |
|
|
|
10,818 |
|
|
|
7,590 |
|
|
|
4,747 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
43,782 |
|
|
|
35,508 |
|
|
|
37,412 |
|
|
|
24,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Financing |
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
2,783 |
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
Restructured Loans |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
289,846 |
|
|
|
212,714 |
|
|
|
294,438 |
|
|
|
106,852 |
|
|
|
73,679 |
|
Total repossessed assets |
|
|
34,486 |
|
|
|
21,592 |
|
|
|
16,447 |
|
|
|
6,173 |
|
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets |
|
$ |
324,332 |
|
|
$ |
234,306 |
|
|
$ |
310,885 |
|
|
$ |
113,025 |
|
|
$ |
76,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more |
|
$ |
11,214 |
|
|
$ |
13,462 |
|
|
$ |
7,162 |
|
|
$ |
20,938 |
|
|
$ |
2,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
5.30 |
% |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
1.54 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
Non-performing loans plus accruing loans
past due 90 days or more to total loans |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
|
2.97 |
% |
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
1.23 |
% |
|
|
0.92 |
% |
Interest lost |
|
$ |
11,888 |
|
|
$ |
9,268 |
|
|
$ |
7,708 |
|
|
$ |
3,112 |
|
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
Non-performing assets consist of past-due commercial loans, construction loans, lease financing and
closed-end consumer loans with principal or interest payments over 90 days on which no interest
income is being accrued, and mortgage loans with principal or interest payments over 120 days past
due on which no interest income is being accrued, renegotiated loans and other real estate owned.
Once a loan is placed on non-accrual status, interest is recorded as income only to the extent of
the Corporations management expectations regarding the full collectibility of principal and
interest on such loans. The interest income that would have been realized had these loans been
performing in accordance with their original terms amounted to $11.9 million, $9.3 million and $7.7
million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Non-performing loans to total loans as of December 31, 2009 were 5.30%, 185 basis point increase
compared to the 3.45% reported as of December 31, 2008. Non-performing loans at December 31, 2009
amounted to $289.8 million. The Corporations non-performing loans reflected an increase of $77.1
million or 36.3% compared to non-performing loans as of December 31, 2008. This change was driven
by increases in non-performing mortgage loans of $69.7 million or 59.9% and in non-performing
consumer loans (including non-performing consumer finance) of $5.2 million or 10.6%.
Repossessed assets increased $12.9 million or 59.7% to $34.5 million at December 31, 2009, from
$21.6 million at December 31, 2008.
As of December 31, 2009, the coverage ratio (allowance for loan losses to total non-performing
loans) decreased to 68.07% in 2009 from 90.21% in 2008. Excluding non-performing mortgage loans
(for which the Corporation has historically had a minimal loss experience) this ratio is 230.42% at
December 31, 2009 compared to 225.06% as of December 31, 2008.
The accrual of interest on commercial loans, construction loans, lease financing and closed-end
consumer loans is discontinued when, in managements opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet
payments as they become due, but in no event is it recognized after 90 days in arrears on payments
of principal or interest. Interest on mortgage loans is not recognized after four months in arrears
on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end (revolving credit)
consumer
loans until the loans are charged off. When interest accrual is discontinued, unpaid interest is
reversed on all closed-end
69
portfolios. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the
extent that it is received. The non accrual status is discontinued when loans are made current by
the borrower.
Potential Problem Loans
As a general rule, the Corporation closely monitors certain loans not disclosed under
Non-performing Assets and Past Due Loans but that represent a greater than normal credit risk.
These loans are not included under the non-performing category, but management provides close
supervision of their performance. The identification process is implemented through various risk
management procedures, such as periodic review of customer relationships, a risk grading system, an
internal watch system and a loan review process. This classification system enables management to
respond to changing circumstances and to address the risk that may arise from changing business
conditions or any other factors that bear significantly on the overall condition of these loans.
The principal amounts of loans under this category as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 were
approximately $428.5 million and $297.8 million, respectively.
Asset and Liability Management
The Corporations policy with respect to asset liability management is to maximize its net interest
income, return on assets and return on equity while remaining within the established parameters of
interest rate and liquidity risks provided by the Board of Directors and the relevant regulatory
authorities. Subject to these constraints, the Corporation takes mismatched interest rate
positions. The Corporations asset and liability management policies are developed and implemented
by its Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO), which is composed of senior members of the
Corporation including the President, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and other executive
officers of the Corporation. The ALCO reports on a monthly basis to the members of the Banks Board
of Directors.
Market Risk and Interest Rate Sensitivity
A key component of the Corporations asset and liability policy is the management of interest rate
sensitivity. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between market interest rates and net
interest income due to the maturity or repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. For any given period, the pricing structure is matched when an equal
amount of such assets and liabilities mature or reprice in that period. Any mismatch of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is known as a gap position. A positive
gap denotes asset sensitivity, which means that an increase in interest rates would have a positive
effect on net interest income, while a decrease in interest rates would have a negative effect on
net interest income. A negative gap denotes liability sensitivity, which means that a decrease in
interest rates would have a positive effect on net interest income, while an increase in interest
rates would have a negative effect on net interest income. Because different types of assets and
liabilities with the same or similar maturities may react differently to changes in overall market
rates or conditions, changes in interest rates may affect net interest income positively or
negatively even if an institution were perfectly matched in each maturity category.
The Corporations one-year cumulative GAP position at December 31, 2009, was negative $0.7 billion
or -11.0% of total earning assets. This is a one-day position that is continually changing and is
not indicative of the Corporations position at any other time. This denotes liability
sensitivity, which means that an increase in interest rates would have a negative effect on net
interest income while a decrease in interest rates would have a positive effect on net interest
income. While the GAP position is a useful tool in measuring interest rate risk and contributes
toward effective asset and liability management, shortcomings are inherent in GAP analysis since
certain assets and liabilities may not move proportionally as interest rates change.
The Corporations interest rate sensitivity strategy takes into account not only rates of return
and the underlying degree of risk, but also liquidity requirements, capital costs and additional
demand for funds. The Corporations maturity mismatches and positions are monitored by the ALCO
and managed within limits established by the Board of Directors.
The following table sets forth the repricing of the Corporations interest earning assets and
interest bearing liabilities at December 31, 2009 and may not be representative of interest rate
gap positions at other times. In addition, variations in interest rate sensitivity may exist
within the repricing period presented due to the differing repricing dates within the period. In
preparing the interest rate gap report, the following assumptions was considered, all assets and
liabilities are reported according to their repricing characteristics. For example, a commercial
loan maturing in five years with monthly variable interest rate payments is stated in the column of
up to 90 days. The investment portfolio is reported considering the effective duration of the
securities. Expected prepayments and remaining terms are considered for the residential mortgage
portfolio. Core deposits are reported in accordance with their effective duration. Effective
duration of core deposits is based on price and volume elasticity to market rates. The Corporation
reviews on a monthly basis the effective duration of core deposits. Assets and liabilities with
embedded options are stated based on full valuation of the asset/liability and the option to
ascertain their effective duration.
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Sensitivity |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
0 to 3 |
|
|
3 months |
|
|
1 to 3 |
|
|
3 to 5 |
|
|
5 to 10 |
|
|
More than |
|
|
No Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
to a Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
10 Years |
|
|
Rate Risk |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Portfolio |
|
$ |
99,872 |
|
|
$ |
18,689 |
|
|
$ |
263,257 |
|
|
$ |
22,337 |
|
|
$ |
9,725 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
106,898 |
|
|
$ |
520,778 |
|
Deposits with Other Banks |
|
|
226,841 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,438 |
|
|
|
330,947 |
|
Loan Portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
1,014,360 |
|
|
|
339,663 |
|
|
|
190,250 |
|
|
|
161,354 |
|
|
|
116,998 |
|
|
|
67,934 |
|
|
|
91,020 |
|
|
|
1,981,579 |
|
Construction |
|
|
47,943 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
9,678 |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,707 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
305,142 |
|
|
|
183,149 |
|
|
|
311,450 |
|
|
|
163,226 |
|
|
|
24,693 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
15,207 |
|
|
|
1,002,893 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
112,797 |
|
|
|
298,411 |
|
|
|
563,922 |
|
|
|
430,735 |
|
|
|
744,739 |
|
|
|
130,170 |
|
|
|
134,520 |
|
|
|
2,415,294 |
|
Fixed and Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444,238 |
|
|
|
444,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
|
1,806,955 |
|
|
|
849,081 |
|
|
|
1,338,557 |
|
|
|
779,380 |
|
|
|
899,679 |
|
|
|
199,463 |
|
|
|
893,321 |
|
|
|
6,766,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External Funds Purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Paper |
|
|
67,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
67,482 |
|
Repurchase Agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds and other borrowings |
|
|
535,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,110,000 |
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of Deposit |
|
|
1,179,664 |
|
|
|
392,284 |
|
|
|
90,422 |
|
|
|
12,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(6,362 |
) |
|
|
1,669,063 |
|
Demand Deposits and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings Accounts |
|
|
184,934 |
|
|
|
37,028 |
|
|
|
202,028 |
|
|
|
159,145 |
|
|
|
118,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,421 |
) |
|
|
698,769 |
|
Transactional Accounts |
|
|
206,438 |
|
|
|
367,366 |
|
|
|
770,070 |
|
|
|
86,167 |
|
|
|
597,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
2,027,728 |
|
Senior and Subordinated Debt |
|
|
4,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,691 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
4,009 |
|
|
|
329,272 |
|
Other Liabilities and Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
864,122 |
|
|
|
864,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Capital |
|
|
2,178,351 |
|
|
|
1,046,678 |
|
|
|
1,403,277 |
|
|
|
258,163 |
|
|
|
960,518 |
|
|
|
60,204 |
|
|
|
859,245 |
|
|
|
6,766,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps (Assets) |
|
|
1,637,166 |
|
|
|
23,645 |
|
|
|
14,068 |
|
|
|
27,417 |
|
|
|
1,592,341 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,330,637 |
|
Interest Rate Swaps (Liabilities) |
|
|
(1,762,447 |
) |
|
|
(23,645 |
) |
|
|
(13,787 |
) |
|
|
(27,417 |
) |
|
|
(1,467,341 |
) |
|
|
(36,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,330,637 |
) |
Caps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
780 |
|
Caps Final Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP |
|
|
(496,677 |
) |
|
|
(197,597 |
) |
|
|
(64,439 |
) |
|
|
521,217 |
|
|
|
64,161 |
|
|
|
139,259 |
|
|
|
34,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP |
|
$ |
(496,677 |
) |
|
$ |
(694,274 |
) |
|
$ |
(758,713 |
) |
|
$ |
(237,496 |
) |
|
$ |
(173,335 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,076 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP to earning assets |
|
|
-7.86 |
% |
|
|
-10.98 |
% |
|
|
-12.00 |
% |
|
|
-3.76 |
% |
|
|
-2.74 |
% |
|
|
-0.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate risk is the primary market risk to which the Corporation is exposed. Nearly all of
the Corporations interest rate risk arises from instruments, positions and transactions entered
into for purposes other than trading. They include loans, investment securities, deposits,
short-term borrowings, senior and subordinated debt and derivative financial instruments used for
asset and liability management.
As part of its interest rate risk management process, the Corporation analyzes on an ongoing basis
the profitability of the balance sheet structure, and how this structure will react under different
market scenarios. In order to carry out this task, management prepares three standardized reports
with detailed information on the sources of interest income and expense: the Financial
Profitability Report, the Net Interest Income Shock Report and the Market Value Shock Report.
The former report deals with historical data while the latter two deal with expected future
earnings.
The Financial Profitability Report identifies individual components of the Corporations
non-trading portfolio independently with their corresponding interest income or expense. It uses
the historical information at the end of each month to track the yield of such components and to
calculate net interest income for such time period.
71
The Net Interest Income Shock Report uses a simulation analysis to measure the amount of net
interest income the Corporation would have from its operations throughout the next twelve months
and the sensitivity of these earnings to assumed shifts in market interest rates throughout the
same period. The important assumptions of this analysis are: ( i ) rate shifts are parallel and
immediate throughout the yield curve; (ii) rate changes affect all assets and liabilities equally;
(iii) interest-bearing demand accounts and savings passbooks will run off in a period of one year;
and (iv) demand deposit accounts will run off in a period of one to three years. Cash flows from
assets and liabilities are assumed to be reinvested at market rates in similar instruments. The
object is to simulate a dynamic gap analysis enabling a more accurate interest rate risk
assessment.
The ALCO monitors interest rate gaps in combination with net interest margin (NIM) sensitivity and
duration of market value equity (MVE).
NIM sensitivity analysis captures the maximum acceptable net interest margin loss for a one percent
parallel change of all interest rates across the curve. Duration of market value equity analysis
entails a valuation of all interest bearing assets and liabilities under parallel movements in
interest rates. The ALCO has established limits of $35 million of NIM sensitivity for a 1% parallel
shock and $140 million of MVE sensitivity for a 1% parallel shock.
As of December 31, 2009, it was determined for purposes of the Net Interest Income Shock Report
that the Corporation had a potential loss in net interest income of approximately $6.8 million if
market rates were to increase 100 basis points immediately parallel across the yield curve, less
than the $35.0 million limit. For purposes of the Market Value Shock Report it was determined that
the Corporation had a potential loss of approximately $22.1 million if market rates were to
increase 100 basis points immediately parallel across the yield curve, less than the $140.0 million
limit. The tables below present a summary of the Corporations net interest margin and market value
shock reports, considering several scenarios as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST MARGIN SHOCK REPORT |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
-200 BPs |
|
|
-100 BPs |
|
|
-50 BPs |
|
|
Base Case |
|
|
+50 BPs |
|
|
+100 BPs |
|
|
+200 BPs |
|
Gross Interest Margin |
|
$ |
397.8 |
|
|
$ |
406.5 |
|
|
$ |
405.0 |
|
|
$ |
401.6 |
|
|
$ |
398.4 |
|
|
$ |
394.8 |
|
|
$ |
386.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity |
|
$ |
(3.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARKET VALUE SHOCK REPORT |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
-200 BPs |
|
|
-100 BPs |
|
|
-50 BPs |
|
|
Base Case |
|
|
+50 BPs |
|
|
+100 BPs |
|
|
+200 BP's |
|
Market Value of Equity |
|
$ |
761.1 |
|
|
$ |
783.7 |
|
|
$ |
774.1 |
|
|
$ |
749.9 |
|
|
$ |
750.9 |
|
|
$ |
727.8 |
|
|
$ |
702.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity |
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
33.8 |
|
|
$ |
24.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(22.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(47.7 |
) |
As of December 31, 2009 the Corporation had a liability sensitive profile as explained by
the negative gap, the NIM shock report and the MVE shock report. Any decision to reposition the
balance sheet is taken by the ALCO committee, and is subject to compliance with the established
risk limits. Some factors that could lead to shifts in policy could be, but are not limited to,
changes in views on interest rate markets, monetary policy, and macroeconomic factors as well as
legal, fiscal and other factors which could lead to shifts in the asset liability mix.
72
Derivatives
The Corporation uses derivative financial instruments mostly as hedges of interest rate risk,
changes in fair value of assets and liabilities and to secure future cash flows. Refer to Notes 1
and 22 to the consolidated financial statements for details of the Corporations derivative
transactions as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
In the normal course of business, the Corporation utilizes derivative instruments to manage
exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, currencies and other markets, to meet the needs of
customers and for proprietary trading activities. The Corporation uses the same credit risk
management procedures to assess and approve potential credit exposures when entering into
derivative transactions as those used for traditional lending.
Hedging Activities:
The following table summarizes the derivative contracts designated as hedges as of December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Income |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts * |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
(Loss)** |
|
Economic Undesignated Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
(5,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
(492 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,702 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Income |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts * |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
(Loss)** |
|
Cash Flow Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
Economic Undesignated Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
|
4,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,210 |
|
|
$ |
4,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Income |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts * |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
|
(Loss)** |
|
Cash Flow Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
Fair Value Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
|
937,863 |
|
|
|
(4,425 |
) |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
1,587,863 |
|
|
$ |
(6,452 |
) |
|
$ |
(465 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The notional amount represents the gross sum of long and short |
|
** |
|
Net of tax |
73
Cash Flow Hedges:
The Corporation designates hedges as Cash Flow Hedges when its main purpose is to reduce the
exposure associated with the variability of future cash flows related to fluctuations in short term
financing rates (such as LIBOR). At the inception of each hedge, management documents the hedging
relationship, including its objective and probable effectiveness. To assess ongoing effectiveness
of the hedges, the Corporation compares the hedged items periodic variable rate with the hedging
items benchmark rate (LIBOR) at every reporting period to determine the effectiveness of the
hedge. Any hedge ineffectiveness is recorded currently as a derivative gain or loss in consolidated
statements of income.
The Corporation had a $100 million floating-for-fixed interest rate swap designated as cash flow
hedges with LBSF. The derivative liability of this swap was $371,736 as of September 19, 2008 and
was paid on December 5, 2008. As a result of the bankruptcy filing of LBHI and the default on its
contractual payments as of September 19, 2008, the Corporation terminated the swap and the cash
flow hedge designation on these swaps. The net loss of $371,000 was reclassified into earnings in
the last quarter of 2008.
Economic Undesignated Hedges:
The Corporation adopted the accounting standard FASB ASC Topic 825 effective January 1, 2008 which
permit the measurement of selected financial instruments at fair value. The Corporation elected to
account at fair value certain of its brokered deposits and subordinated capital notes that were
previously designated for fair value hedge accounting in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815. The
selected financial instruments are reported at fair value with changes in fair value reported in
condensed consolidated statements of income.
As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the economic undesignated hedges have maturities
through the year 2032. The weighted average rate paid and received on these contracts is 0.68% and
6.22% as of December 31, 2009 and 3.24% and 6.22% as of December 31, 2008, respectively.
The Corporation had issued fixed rate debt swapped to create a floating rate source of funds. In
this case, the Corporation matches all of the relevant economic variables (notional, coupon,
payments date and exchanges, etc) of the fixed rate sources of funds to the fixed rate portion of
the interest rate swaps, (which it received from counterparty), and pays the floating rate portion
of the interest swaps. The effectiveness of these transactions is very high since all of the
relevant economic variables are matched. For the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Corporation recognized a loss of approximately $5.7 million and a gain of $4.3 million,
respectively, on these economic hedges, which is included in other income in the consolidated
statements of income.
As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had outstanding interest rate swap agreements with a
notional amount of approximately $125 million, maturing through the year 2032. The weighted
average rate paid and received on these contracts is 3.24% and 6.22%, respectively. As of December
31, 2008, the Corporation had two subordinated notes aggregating to approximately $125 million,
with a fair value of $118.3 million, swapped to create a floating rate source of funds. As a result
of the bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. (LBHI) and the default on its
contractual payments as of September 19, 2008, the Corporation terminated $23.8 million of
fixed-for-floating interest rate swaps. The derivative liability of the swaps with Lehman Brothers
Special Financing (LBSF) was $681,535 as of September 19, 2008 and was paid on December 5, 2008.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation has $0.5 million and $5.2 million, respectively,
in fair value of these economic undesignated hedges.
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:
Any derivative not associated to hedging activity is booked as a freestanding derivative. In the
normal course of business the Corporation may enter into derivative contracts as either a market
maker or proprietary position taker. The Corporations mission as a market maker is to meet the
clients needs by providing them with a wide array of financial products, which include derivative
contracts. The Corporations major role in this aspect is to serve as a derivative counterparty to
these clients. Positions taken with these clients are hedged (although not designated as hedges) in
the OTC market with interbank participants or in the organized futures markets. To a lesser extent,
the Corporation enters into freestanding derivative contracts as a proprietary position taker,
based on market expectations or to benefit from price differentials between financial instruments
and markets. The Corporation had $13.8 million of interest rate swaps with LBSF. The derivative
liability of these swaps was $166,333 as of September 19, 2008 and was paid on December 5, 2008. As
a result of the bankruptcy filing of LBHI and the default on its contractual payments as of
September 19, 2008, the Corporation terminated these swaps.
74
These derivatives are not linked to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to
forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge relationship and, therefore, do not qualify for
hedge accounting. These derivatives are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are
recorded in earnings. The market and credit risk associated with these activities is measured,
monitored and controlled by the Corporations Market Risk Group, a unit independent from the
treasury department. Among other things, this group is responsible for: policy, analysis,
methodology and reporting of anything related to market risk and credit risk. The following table
summarizes the aggregate notional amounts and the reported derivative assets or liabilities (i.e.
the fair value of the derivative contracts) as of December 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts * |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
Interest Rate Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
3,330,637 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
Interest Rate Caps |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
Equity Derivatives |
|
|
210,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
3,545,764 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts * |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
Interest Rate Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
3,548,418 |
|
|
$ |
(53 |
) |
|
$ |
(392 |
) |
Interest Rate Caps |
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Equity Derivatives |
|
|
236,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
3,789,874 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amounts * |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Loss) |
|
Interest Rate Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
$ |
3,237,179 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
Interest Rate Caps |
|
|
14,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Equity Derivatives |
|
|
267,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
3,520,516 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
$ |
714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The notional amount represents the gross sum of long and short |
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that not enough cash will be generated from either assets or liabilities
to meet deposit withdrawals or contractual loan funding. The Corporations general policy is to
maintain liquidity adequate to ensure our ability to honor withdrawals of deposits, make repayments
at maturity of other liabilities, extend loans and meet working capital needs. The Corporations
principal sources of liquidity are capital, core deposits from retail and commercial clients, and
wholesale deposits raised in the inter-bank and commercial markets. The Corporation manages
liquidity risk by maintaining diversified
75
short-term and long-term sources through the Federal
funds market, commercial paper program, repurchase agreements and retail certificate of deposit
programs. As of December 31, 2009 the Corporation had $1.5 billion in unsecured lines of credit
($0.6 billion available) and $3.7 billion in collateralized lines of credit with banks and
financial entities ($2.6 billion available). All securities in portfolio are highly rated and very
liquid, enabling us to treat them as a secondary source of liquidity.
The Corporation does not have significant usage or limitations on its ability to upstream or
downstream funds as a method of liquidity. However, there are certain tax constraints when
borrowing funds (excluding the placement of deposits) from Santander Spain or affiliates because
Puerto Ricos tax code requires local corporations to withhold 29% of the interest income paid to
non-resident affiliates. The Corporation does not face significant limitations to its ability to
downstream funds to its affiliates. The current intra-group credit line for the Corporation is
$1.4 billion.
Liquidity is derived from capital, reserves and the securities portfolio. The Corporation has
established lines of credit with foreign and domestic banks, has access to U.S. markets through its
commercial paper program and also has broadened its relations in the federal funds and repurchase
agreement markets to increase the availability of other sources of funds and to augment liquidity
as necessary.
On January 22, 2010, the Corporation and Santander Financial Services, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Corporation (Santander Financial), entered into a collateralized loan agreement
(the Loan Agreement) with Banco Santander Puerto Rico (the Bank). Under the Loan Agreement, the
Bank advanced $182 million and $430 million (the Loans) to the Corporation and Santander
Financial, respectively. The proceeds of the Loans were used to refinance the outstanding
indebtedness incurred under a loan agreement dated September 24, 2009 among the Corporation,
Santander Financial and the Bank, and for general corporate purposes. The Loans are collateralized
by a certificate of deposit in the amount of $612 million opened by Banco Santander, S.A., the
parent of the Corporation, at the Bank and provided as security for the Loans pursuant to the terms
of a Security Agreement, Pledge and Assignment between the Bank and Banco Santander, S.A. The
Corporation and Santander Financial have agreed to pay an annual fee of 0.10% net of taxes,
deductions and withholdings to Banco Santander, S.A. in connection with its agreement to
collateralize the Loans with the deposit.
On September 24, 2009, Santander BanCorp and Santander Financial Services, Inc., entered into a
collateralized loan agreement (the Loan Agreement) with Banco Santander Puerto Rico. Under the
Loan Agreement, the Bank advanced $190 million and $440 million (the Loans) to the Corporation
and Santander Financial, respectively. The proceeds of the Loans were used to refinance the
outstanding indebtedness incurred under a loan agreement dated September 24, 2008 among the
Corporation, Santander Financial and the Bank, and for general corporate purposes. The Loans are
collateralized by a certificate of deposit in the amount of $630 million opened by Banco Santander,
S.A., the parent of the Corporation, at the Bank and provided as security for the Loans pursuant to
the terms of a Security Agreement, Pledge and Assignment between the Bank and Banco Santander, S.A.
The Corporation and Santander Financial have agreed to pay an annual fee of 0.10% net of taxes,
deductions and withholdings to Banco Santander, S.A. in connection with its agreement to
collateralize the Loans with the deposit.
On December 10, 2008, the Bank undertook a Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement with Crefisa, Inc,
(Crefisa), an affiliate, for $60 million due on December 10, 2028 and to pay interest thereon
from December 10, 2008 or from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been
paid or duly provided for, semiannually on the tenth (10th) day of June and the tenth
(10th) of December of each year, commencing on June 10, 2009, at the rate of 7.5% per
annum, until the principal hereof is paid or made available for payment. The interest so payable,
and punctually paid or duly provided for, on any interest payment date will, as provided in such
Note Purchase Agreement, be paid to Crefisa at the close of business on the regular record date for
such interest, which shall be the tenth (10th) day of the month next preceding the
relevant interest payment date.
In October 2006, the Corporation also completed the private placement of $125 million Trust
Preferred Securities (Preferred Securities) and issued Junior Subordinated Debentures in the
aggregate principal amount of $129 million in connection with the issuance of the Preferred
Securities. The Preferred Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (to the extent
described in the guarantee agreement between the Corporation and the guarantee trustee, for the
benefit of the holders from time to time of the Preferred Securities) by the Corporation. The Trust
Preferred Securities were acquired by an affiliate of the Corporation. In connection with the
issuance of the Preferred Securities, the Corporation issued an aggregate principal amount of
$129,000,000 of its 7.00% Junior Subordinated Debentures, Series A, due July 1, 2037 to the Trust.
The Corporation has a high credit rating, which permits the Corporation to utilize various
alternative funding sources. The Corporations current ratings are as follows:
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard |
|
Fitch |
|
|
& Poors |
|
IBCA |
Short-term funding |
|
A-1 |
|
F1+ |
Long-term funding |
|
A |
|
AA- |
Management monitors liquidity levels each month. The focus is on the liquidity ratio, which
compares net liquid assets (all liquid assets not subject to collateral or repurchase agreements)
against total liabilities plus contingent liabilities. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation
had a liquidity ratio of 11.24%. At December 31, 2009, the Corporation had total available liquid
assets of $718.8 million. The Corporation believes that it has sufficient liquidity to meet
current obligations.
The Corporation does not contemplate material uncertainties in the rolling over of deposits, both
retail and wholesale, and is not engaged in capital expenditures that would materially affect the
capital and liquidity positions. Should any deficiency arise for seasonal or more critical reasons,
the Bank would make recourse to alternative sources of funding such as the commercial paper
program, its lines of credit with domestic and national banks, unused collateralized lines with
Federal Home Loan Banks and others.
Maturity and Interest Rate Sensitivity of Interest-Earning Assets as of December 31, 2009
The following table sets forth an analysis by type and time remaining to maturity of the
Corporations loans and securities portfolio as of December 31, 2009. Loans are stated before
deduction of the allowance for loan losses and include loans held for sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Maturities and/or Next Repricing Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Through Five Years |
|
|
After Five Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Less |
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents and
other Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
330,947 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
330,947 |
|
Investment Portfolio |
|
|
118,545 |
|
|
|
285,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520,778 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
724,129 |
|
|
|
354,165 |
|
|
|
324,007 |
|
|
|
225,958 |
|
|
|
318,320 |
|
|
|
1,946,579 |
|
Construction |
|
|
25,750 |
|
|
|
6,423 |
|
|
|
10,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,133 |
|
|
|
70,707 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
179,407 |
|
|
|
135,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443,945 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
182,826 |
|
|
|
338,547 |
|
|
|
10,909 |
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
9,999 |
|
|
|
558,948 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
411,208 |
|
|
|
994,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,415,294 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
22,214 |
|
|
|
9,893 |
|
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,995,026 |
|
|
$ |
2,124,758 |
|
|
$ |
345,905 |
|
|
$ |
1,500,057 |
|
|
$ |
356,452 |
|
|
$ |
6,322,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
Capital Expenditures
The following table reflects capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Headquarters/branches |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
412 |
|
|
$ |
1,770 |
|
Data processing equipment |
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
Software |
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
1,981 |
|
Office furniture and equipment |
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,693 |
|
|
$ |
9,426 |
|
|
$ |
6,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009 and 2008, the Corporations capital expenditures reflected an increase in software due
to standard upgrade and improvement procedures.
Environmental Matters
Under various environmental laws and regulations, a lender may be liable as an owner or
operator for the costs of investigation or remediation of hazardous substances at any mortgaged
property or other property of a borrower or at its owned or leased property regardless of whether
the lender knew of, or was responsible for, the hazardous substances. In addition, certain cities
in which some of the Corporations assets are located impose a statutory lien, which may be prior
to the lien of the mortgage, for costs incurred in connection with a cleanup of hazardous
substances.
Some of the Corporations mortgaged properties and owned and leased properties may contain
hazardous substances or are located in the vicinity of properties that are contaminated. As a
result, the value of such properties may decrease, the borrowers ability to repay the loan may be
affected, the Corporations ability to foreclose on certain properties may be affected or the
Corporation may be exposed to potential environmental liabilities. The Corporation, however, is not
aware of any such environmental costs or liabilities that would have a material adverse effect on
the Corporations results of operations or financial condition.
Puerto Rico Income Taxes
The Corporation is subject to Puerto Rico income tax. The maximum statutory regular corporate tax
rate that the Corporation is subject to under the P.R. Code is 39%. In computing its net income
subject to the regular income tax, the Corporation is entitled to exclude from its gross income,
interest derived on obligations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its agencies,
instrumentalities and political subdivisions, obligations of the United States Government and its
agencies and instrumentalities, certain FHA and VA loans and certain GNMA securities. In computing
its net income subject to the regular income tax the Corporation is entitled to claim a deduction
for ordinary and necessary expenses, worthless debts, interest and depreciation, among others. The
Corporations deduction for interest is reduced in the same proportion that the average adjusted
basis of its exempt obligations bears to the average adjusted basis of its total assets.
The Corporation is also subject to an alternative minimum tax of 22% imposed on its alternative
minimum tax net income. In general, the Corporations alternative minimum net income is an amount
equal to its net income determined for regular income tax purposes, as adjusted for certain items
of tax preference. To the extent that the Corporations alternative minimum tax for a taxable year
exceeds its regular tax, such excess is required to be paid by the Corporation as an alternative
minimum tax. An alternative minimum tax paid by the Corporation in any taxable year may be claimed
by the Corporation as a credit in future taxable years against the excess of its regular tax over
the alternative minimum tax in such years, and such credits do not expire.
On July 2009, Governor of Puerto Rico signed Act No. 37, which amends Act No. 7 of March 9, 2009.
This law imposed a temporary three-year surcharge of 5% commencing on taxable year 2009. Since the
5% surcharge is imposed on the tax liability instead of the income subject to tax, the effect of
the 5% surcharge will be that during the temporary period the 39% maximum statutory marginal
corporate income tax rate may be increased to 40.95%. Also, the amendments of Act No. 7 of March 9,
2009, particularly to alternative minimum tax (AMT), eliminates the deduction for expenses
incurred outside Puerto Rico unless these payments are subject to income tax in Puerto Rico. This
law, also, includes a temporary 5% special income tax
78
applicable to Puerto Rico international
banking entities, or IBEs, such as Santander International Bank (SIB), which, before this law, was
exempt from taxation under Puerto Rico law. This special income tax shall be applicable for taxable
years 2009, 2010 and 2011
Under the P.R. Code, corporations are not permitted to file consolidated tax returns with their
subsidiaries and affiliates. However, the Corporation is entitled to a 100% dividend received
deduction with respect to dividends received from Banco Santander Puerto Rico, Santander Securities
Corporation, Santander Insurance Agency, or any other Puerto Rico corporation subject to tax under
the P.R. Code and in which the Corporation owns at least 80% of the value of its stock or voting
power.
Interest paid by the Corporation to non-resident foreign corporations is not subject to Puerto Rico
income tax, provided such foreign corporation is not related to the Corporation. Dividends paid by
the Corporation to non-resident foreign corporations and individuals (whether resident or not) are
subject to a Puerto Rico income tax of 10%.
The Corporation adopted the provisions under FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Tax. These provisions
clarify the accounting for uncertainty of income tax recognized in a enterprises financial
statements in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740. This interpretation prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statements recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition.
The Corporation recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income
tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized $1.8
million and $1.3 million of interest and penalties, respectively, for uncertain tax positions. As
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the related accrued interest amounted to approximated $3.2 million
and $3.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had $8.1 million
and $10.3 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits which, if recognized, would decrease
the effective income tax rate in future periods. The Corporation recognized a tax benefit of $2.3
million and $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, as a result
of the expiration of the statute of limitations related to the uncertain tax positions.
United States Income Taxes
The Corporation, the Bank, Santander Securities and Santander Insurance Agency are corporations
organized under the laws of Puerto Rico. Accordingly, the Corporation, the Bank, Santander
Securities and Santander Insurance Agency are subject to United States income tax under the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date hereof (the Code) only on certain income
from sources within the United States or effectively connected with a United States trade or
business.
79
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 303A.12(a) OF THE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LISTED COMPANY MANUAL
Santander BanCorps Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the certifications required by Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 and to Santander BanCorps 2009 Form
10-K. In addition, on May 4, 2009, Santander BanCorps CEO certified to the New York Stock Exchange
that he was not aware of any violation by the Corporation of the NYSE corporate governance listing
standards. The foregoing certification was unqualified.
Date:
March 5, 2010
By:
/s/ Juan Moreno Blanco
President and Chief Executive Officer
By:
/s/
Roberto Jara
Executive Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
80
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Torre Chardón
350 Chardón Ave. Suite 700
San Juan, PR 00918-2140
USA
Tel: +1 787 759 7171
Fax: +1 787 756 6340
www.deloitte.com
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Santander BanCorp
San Juan, Puerto Rico
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Santander Bancorp and subsidiaries
(the Corporation) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders equity, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. We also have audited the Companys
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. The Companys management is responsible for these financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Santander Bancorp and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
March 5, 2010
Stamp No. 2473573
affixed to original.
Member of
Deloitte & Touche Tohmatsu
Santander BanCorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
296,425 |
|
|
$ |
217,311 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
10,467 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
22,146 |
|
|
|
64,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
329,038 |
|
|
|
283,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Deposits |
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
7,394 |
|
Trading Securities, at fair value |
|
|
47,739 |
|
|
|
64,719 |
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
408,650 |
|
Other investment securities available for sale |
|
|
417,608 |
|
|
|
393,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
|
417,608 |
|
|
|
802,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investment Securities, at amortized cost |
|
|
55,431 |
|
|
|
61,632 |
|
Loans Held for Sale, net |
|
|
26,726 |
|
|
|
38,459 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
5,246,444 |
|
|
|
5,929,499 |
|
Accrued Interest Receivable |
|
|
32,651 |
|
|
|
45,953 |
|
Premises and Equipment, net |
|
|
20,179 |
|
|
|
19,368 |
|
Real Estate Held for Sale |
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
8,075 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
121,482 |
|
|
|
121,482 |
|
Intangible Assets, net |
|
|
28,948 |
|
|
|
29,842 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
435,463 |
|
|
|
485,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,766,436 |
|
|
$ |
7,897,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest-bearing |
|
$ |
698,769 |
|
|
$ |
692,963 |
|
Interest-bearing, including $12.5 million and $101.4 million at fair
value in 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
3,696,791 |
|
|
|
4,321,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
4,395,560 |
|
|
|
5,014,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds Purchased and Other Borrowings |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
Commercial Paper Issued |
|
|
67,482 |
|
|
|
50,985 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances |
|
|
1,060,000 |
|
|
|
1,185,000 |
|
Term Notes |
|
|
20,581 |
|
|
|
19,967 |
|
Subordinated
Capital Notes, including $120.6 million and 118.3 million at fair value in 2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
308,691 |
|
|
|
306,392 |
|
Accrued Interest Payable |
|
|
14,015 |
|
|
|
45,419 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
254,210 |
|
|
|
346,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,170,539 |
|
|
|
7,345,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies and Commitments (Notes 18, 22 and 23) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Preferred stock, $25 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $2.50 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 50,650,364 shares issued;
46,639,104 shares outstanding |
|
|
126,626 |
|
|
|
126,626 |
|
Capital paid in excess of par value |
|
|
318,263 |
|
|
|
317,141 |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 4,011,260 shares |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes |
|
|
(20,695 |
) |
|
|
(22,563 |
) |
Retained earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve fund |
|
|
141,833 |
|
|
|
139,250 |
|
Undivided profits |
|
|
97,422 |
|
|
|
58,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
595,897 |
|
|
|
551,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,766,436 |
|
|
$ |
7,897,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
81
Santander BanCorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years
Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
460,248 |
|
|
$ |
547,973 |
|
|
$ |
599,581 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
21,302 |
|
|
|
47,402 |
|
|
|
67,830 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
3,344 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
4,333 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
482,158 |
|
|
|
600,771 |
|
|
|
674,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
79,473 |
|
|
|
152,452 |
|
|
|
192,660 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings |
|
|
36,236 |
|
|
|
78,680 |
|
|
|
153,955 |
|
Subordinated capital notes |
|
|
14,722 |
|
|
|
13,317 |
|
|
|
15,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
130,431 |
|
|
|
244,449 |
|
|
|
362,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
351,727 |
|
|
|
356,322 |
|
|
|
311,679 |
|
Provision for Loan Losses |
|
|
152,496 |
|
|
|
175,523 |
|
|
|
147,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
199,231 |
|
|
|
180,799 |
|
|
|
163,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank service charges, fees and other |
|
|
39,837 |
|
|
|
44,685 |
|
|
|
47,201 |
|
Broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees |
|
|
62,688 |
|
|
|
74,808 |
|
|
|
68,265 |
|
Gain on sale of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
9,251 |
|
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
5,144 |
|
|
|
3,253 |
|
|
|
6,658 |
|
Other income |
|
|
5,526 |
|
|
|
19,935 |
|
|
|
24,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income |
|
|
122,446 |
|
|
|
147,835 |
|
|
|
148,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
|
107,019 |
|
|
|
125,137 |
|
|
|
134,258 |
|
Occupancy costs |
|
|
25,291 |
|
|
|
27,665 |
|
|
|
23,767 |
|
Equipment expenses |
|
|
3,907 |
|
|
|
4,358 |
|
|
|
4,427 |
|
EDP servicing, amortization and technical assistance |
|
|
40,645 |
|
|
|
41,860 |
|
|
|
39,255 |
|
Communication expenses |
|
|
9,038 |
|
|
|
10,062 |
|
|
|
10,923 |
|
Business promotion |
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
6,628 |
|
|
|
15,621 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,349 |
|
Provision for claim receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other taxes |
|
|
13,270 |
|
|
|
13,101 |
|
|
|
12,334 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
66,033 |
|
|
|
70,696 |
|
|
|
60,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other operating expenses |
|
|
269,067 |
|
|
|
324,627 |
|
|
|
344,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income tax |
|
|
52,610 |
|
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
|
(32,041 |
) |
Provision (Benefit) for Income Tax |
|
|
11,335 |
|
|
|
(6,524 |
) |
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders |
|
$ |
41,275 |
|
|
$ |
10,531 |
|
|
$ |
(36,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Common Share |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
(0.78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
82
Santander BanCorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Common Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
126,626 |
|
|
$ |
126,626 |
|
|
$ |
126,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
126,626 |
|
|
|
126,626 |
|
|
|
126,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid in Excess of Par Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
317,141 |
|
|
|
308,373 |
|
|
|
304,171 |
|
Capital contribution |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
9,710 |
|
|
|
4,202 |
|
Payments to ultimate parent for long-term incentive plan |
|
|
(1,284 |
) |
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
318,263 |
|
|
|
317,141 |
|
|
|
308,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
(22,563 |
) |
|
|
(24,478 |
) |
|
|
(44,213 |
) |
Unrealized net (loss) gain on investment securities available
for sale, net of tax |
|
|
(3,130 |
) |
|
|
13,449 |
|
|
|
18,227 |
|
Unrealized net gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
Minimum pension benefit (liability), net of tax |
|
|
4,998 |
|
|
|
(12,771 |
) |
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
(20,695 |
) |
|
|
(22,563 |
) |
|
|
(24,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve Fund: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
139,250 |
|
|
|
139,250 |
|
|
|
137,511 |
|
Transfer from undivided profits |
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
141,833 |
|
|
|
139,250 |
|
|
|
139,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undivided Profits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
58,734 |
|
|
|
54,317 |
|
|
|
122,677 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
41,275 |
|
|
|
10,531 |
|
|
|
(36,245 |
) |
Transfer to reseve fund |
|
|
(2,583 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,739 |
) |
Deferred tax benefit amortization |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Common stock cash dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,329 |
) |
|
|
(29,849 |
) |
Cummulative effect of adoption of FASB ASC Topic 825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cummulative effect of adoption of FASB ASC Topic 740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
97,422 |
|
|
|
58,734 |
|
|
|
54,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
595,897 |
|
|
$ |
551,636 |
|
|
$ |
536,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
83
Santander BanCorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Comprehensive income (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
41,275 |
|
|
$ |
10,531 |
|
|
$ |
(36,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on investment securities available for sale, net of tax |
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
14,142 |
|
|
|
18,170 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for (losses) gains included in net income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
(4,703 |
) |
|
|
(693 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on investment securities available for sale, net of tax |
|
|
(3,130 |
) |
|
|
13,449 |
|
|
|
18,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
(1,023 |
) |
Minimum pension benefit (liability), net of tax |
|
|
4,998 |
|
|
|
(12,771 |
) |
|
|
2,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
1,868 |
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
19,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
43,143 |
|
|
$ |
12,446 |
|
|
$ |
(16,510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
84
Santander BanCorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
41,275 |
|
|
$ |
10,531 |
|
|
$ |
(36,245 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,451 |
|
|
|
15,096 |
|
|
|
16,276 |
|
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(18,083 |
) |
|
|
(23,833 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
152,496 |
|
|
|
175,523 |
|
|
|
147,824 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,349 |
|
Gain on sale of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(9,251 |
) |
|
|
(5,154 |
) |
|
|
(1,265 |
) |
Gain on sale of loans |
|
|
(5,144 |
) |
|
|
(3,253 |
) |
|
|
(6,658 |
) |
Gain on sale of mortgage-servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132 |
) |
Loss (gain) on derivatives and other financial instruments at fair value |
|
|
7,303 |
|
|
|
(3,284 |
) |
|
|
(249 |
) |
Gain on trading securities |
|
|
(3,275 |
) |
|
|
(2,607 |
) |
|
|
(2,831 |
) |
Valuation loss on loans held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net premium amortization (discount accretion) on securities |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
(2,877 |
) |
|
|
(6,782 |
) |
Net (discount accretion) premium amortization on loans |
|
|
(2,646 |
) |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
Accretion of debt discount |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation (benefit) sponsored by the ultimate parent |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
14,656 |
|
Provision for claim receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases and originations of loans held for sale |
|
|
(195,466 |
) |
|
|
(345,706 |
) |
|
|
(556,838 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale |
|
|
199,937 |
|
|
|
437,177 |
|
|
|
305,183 |
|
Repayments of loans held for sale |
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
17,109 |
|
|
|
22,511 |
|
Proceeds from sales of trading securities |
|
|
1,002,635 |
|
|
|
2,215,946 |
|
|
|
2,553,127 |
|
Purchases of trading securities |
|
|
(883,665 |
) |
|
|
(2,101,645 |
) |
|
|
(2,576,040 |
) |
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
13,302 |
|
|
|
32,382 |
|
|
|
22,215 |
|
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
|
(10,788 |
) |
|
|
19,897 |
|
|
|
(116,664 |
) |
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
|
|
(31,406 |
) |
|
|
(31,709 |
) |
|
|
(13,889 |
) |
Decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(11,683 |
) |
|
|
(3,469 |
) |
|
|
(48,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
238,047 |
|
|
|
427,671 |
|
|
|
(229,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
279,322 |
|
|
|
438,202 |
|
|
|
(266,189 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
5,485 |
|
|
|
(1,955 |
) |
|
|
46,016 |
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
507,256 |
|
|
|
129,451 |
|
|
|
149,413 |
|
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
196,240 |
|
|
|
8,858,239 |
|
|
|
36,258,629 |
|
Purchases of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(346,155 |
) |
|
|
(8,808,967 |
) |
|
|
(36,323,477 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of other investment securities |
|
|
104,526 |
|
|
|
40,727 |
|
|
|
16,526 |
|
Purchases of other investments |
|
|
(98,325 |
) |
|
|
(37,800 |
) |
|
|
(30,375 |
) |
Repayment of securities and securities called |
|
|
32,006 |
|
|
|
89,302 |
|
|
|
100,631 |
|
Payments on derivative transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,497 |
) |
|
|
(434 |
) |
Net decrease in loans |
|
|
422,615 |
|
|
|
547,090 |
|
|
|
15,083 |
|
Proceeds from sales of mortgage-servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
Proceeds from sale of buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,750 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(1,582 |
) |
|
|
(5,137 |
) |
|
|
(3,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
822,066 |
|
|
|
809,453 |
|
|
|
285,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
|
85
Santander BanCorp and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in deposits |
|
|
(618,680 |
) |
|
|
(149,298 |
) |
|
|
(168,296 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased and other borrowings |
|
|
(77,040 |
) |
|
|
(765,070 |
) |
|
|
323,710 |
|
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(375,000 |
) |
|
|
(60,597 |
) |
|
|
(194,972 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) in commercial paper issued |
|
|
16,496 |
|
|
|
(233,497 |
) |
|
|
74,933 |
|
Net decrease in term notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,158 |
) |
Issuance of subordinated capital notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Payments to ultimate parent for long-term incentives plans |
|
|
(1,284 |
) |
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,790 |
) |
|
|
(29,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(1,055,508 |
) |
|
|
(1,166,194 |
) |
|
|
(16,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
45,880 |
|
|
|
81,461 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
|
283,158 |
|
|
|
201,697 |
|
|
|
199,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR |
|
$ |
329,038 |
|
|
$ |
283,158 |
|
|
$ |
201,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Concluded) |
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
160,405 |
|
|
$ |
274,186 |
|
|
$ |
375,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
8,023 |
|
|
$ |
10,756 |
|
|
$ |
23,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised options in ultimate parent stock recognized as capital
contribution |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,661 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension benefit (liability) |
|
$ |
4,998 |
|
|
$ |
(12,771 |
) |
|
$ |
2,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan securitization |
|
$ |
98,715 |
|
|
$ |
107,691 |
|
|
$ |
47,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets received in full satisfaction of loans |
|
$ |
23,916 |
|
|
$ |
16,978 |
|
|
$ |
20,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of premises to real estate held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of real estate held for sale to premises |
|
$ |
5,257 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement
by counterparty in bankruptcy of securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200,228 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement
by counterparty in bankruptcy of investment securities available for sale pledged under agreement to repurchase |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
225,348 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
|
86
Santander BanCorp and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Other Matters:
The accounting and reporting policies of Santander BanCorp (the Corporation), a 91% owned
subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A. (Santander Group), conform with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as generally accepted accounting
principles or GAAP) and with general practices within the financial services industry.
Following is a summary of the Corporations most significant accounting policies:
Nature of Operations and Use of Estimates
Santander BanCorp is a financial holding company offering a full range of financial services
(including mortgage banking) through its wholly owned banking subsidiary Banco Santander Puerto
Rico (the Bank). The Corporation also engages in broker-dealer, asset management, consumer
finance, international banking, insurance agency services and insurance products through its
subsidiaries, Santander Securities Corporation, Santander Asset Management Corporation, Santander
Financial Services, Inc. (Island Finance), Santander International Bank, Santander Insurance
Agency and Island Insurance Corporation (currently inactive), respectively.
Santander BanCorp is subject to the Federal Bank Holding Company Act and to the regulations,
supervision, and examination of the Federal Reserve Board.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that
are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of
the allowance for loan losses, impairment of goodwill and other intangibles, income taxes, and the
valuation of foreclosed real estate, deferred tax assets and financial instruments.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation, the Bank and the
Banks wholly owned subsidiary, Santander International Bank; Santander Securities Corporation and
its wholly owned subsidiary, Santander Asset Management Corporation; Santander Financial Services,
Inc., Santander Insurance Agency and Island Insurance Corporation.
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Effective January 1, 2008,
Santander Mortgage Corporation (a formerly wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank) was merged into the
Bank and ceased to operate as a separate legal entity.
Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less, when acquired or generated,
are considered cash equivalents.
Securities Purchased/Sold under Agreements to Resell/Repurchase
Repurchase and resell agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are
carried at the amounts at which the assets will be reacquired or resold at the contractual
maturity. The settlement of these agreements prior to maturity may be subject to early termination
penalties.
The counterparties to securities purchased under resell agreements maintain effective control over
such securities and accordingly, those securities are not reflected in the Corporations
consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation monitors the market value of the underlying
securities as compared to the related receivable, including accrued interest, and requests
additional collateral where deemed appropriate.
87
The Corporation maintains effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase;
accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated balance sheets.
Investment Securities
Investment securities are classified in four categories and accounted for as follows:
|
|
|
Debt securities that the Corporation has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are
classified as securities held to maturity and reported at cost adjusted for premium
amortization and discount accretion. The Corporation may not sell or transfer held to
maturity securities without calling into question its intent to hold securities to
maturity, unless a nonrecurring or unusual event that could not have been reasonably
anticipated has occurred. |
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of
selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities and reported at fair
value with unrealized gains and losses included in the consolidated statements of
operations as part of other income. Financial instruments including, to a limited extent,
derivatives, such as option contracts, are used by the Corporation in dealing and other
trading activities and are carried at fair value. Interest revenue and expense arising from
trading instruments are included in the consolidated statements of operations as part of
net interest income. |
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity securities not classified as either securities held to maturity or
trading securities, and which have a readily available fair value, are classified as
securities available for sale and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
reported, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The specific
identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on sales of securities
available for sale, which are included in gain (loss) on sale of investment securities in
the consolidated statements of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Investments in debt, equity or other securities, that do not have readily determinable
fair values, are classified as other investment securities in the consolidated balance
sheets. These securities are stated at cost. Stock that is owned by the Corporation to
comply with regulatory requirements, such as Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, is
included in this category. |
The amortization of premiums is deducted and the accretion of discounts is added to net interest
income based on a method which approximates the interest method, over the outstanding life of the
related securities. The cost of securities sold is determined by specific identification. For
securities available for sale, held to maturity and other investment securities, the Corporation
reports separately in the consolidated statements of operations, net realized gains or losses on
sales of investment securities and unrealized loss valuation adjustments considered other than
temporary, if any.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Corporation uses derivative financial instruments mostly as hedges of interest rate risk,
changes in fair value of assets and liabilities and to secure future cash flows.
All of the Corporations derivative instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair
value. If certain conditions are met, the derivative may qualify for hedge accounting treatment and
be designated as one of the following types of hedges: (a) hedge of the exposure to changes in the
fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment (fair value
hedge); (b) a hedge of the exposure to variability of cash flows of a recognized asset, liability
or forecasted transaction (cash flow hedge) or (c) a hedge of foreign currency exposure (foreign
currency hedge).
Prior to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) Accounting Standard
Codification (ASC or the Codification) Topic 825, Fair Value Option, in the case of a qualifying
fair value hedge, changes in the value of the derivative instruments that have been highly
effective were recognized in current period consolidated statements of operations along with the
change in value of the designated hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. If the hedge
relationship was terminated, hedge accounting was discontinued and any balance related to the
derivative was recognized in current operations, and the fair value adjustment to the hedged item
continued to be reported as part of the basis of the item and was amortized to earnings as a yield
adjustment. The Corporation hedges certain callable brokered certificates of deposits and
subordinated capital notes by using interest rate swaps. In connection with the adoption of FASB
ASC Topic 825,, the Corporation carries certain callable brokered certificates of deposits and
subordinated capital notes at fair value with changes in fair value included in other income in the
consolidated statements of operations. The cost of funding of the Corporations borrowings, as well
as
88
derivatives, continues to be included in interest expense and income, as applicable, in the
consolidated statements of operations. See Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements for
more information.
In the case of a qualifying cash flow hedge, changes in the value of the derivative instruments
that have been highly effective are recognized in other comprehensive income, until such time as
those earnings are affected by the variability of the cash flows of the underlying hedged item. If
the hedge relationship is terminated, the net derivative gain or loss related to the discontinued
cash flow hedge should continue to be reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and
would be reclassified into earnings when the cash flows that were hedged occur, or when the
forecasted transaction affects earnings or is no longer expected to occur. In either a fair value
hedge or a cash flow hedge, net earnings may be impacted to the extent the changes in the value of
the derivative instruments do not perfectly offset changes in the value of the hedged items. If the
derivative is not designated as a hedging instrument, the changes in fair value of the derivative
are recorded in consolidated statements of operations.
Certain contracts contain embedded derivatives. When the embedded derivative possesses economic
characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the
host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and designated as a trading or non-hedging
derivative instrument.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or market computed on the aggregate portfolio
basis. The amount, by which cost exceeds market value, if any, is accounted for as a valuation
allowance with changes included in the determination of results of operations for the period in
which the change occurs. The amount of loan origination cost and fees are deferred at origination
of the loans and recognized as part of the gain and loss on sale of the loans in the consolidated
statement of operations as part of other income.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until
maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for the
allowance for loan losses, unearned finance charges and any deferred fees or costs on originated
loans.
Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain
direct origination costs, are deferred and amortized using methods that approximate the interest
method over the term of the loans as an adjustment to interest yield. Discounts and premiums on
purchased loans are amortized to results of operations over the expected lives of the loans using a
method that approximates the interest method.
The accrual of interest on commercial loans, construction loans, lease financing and closed-end
consumer loans is discontinued when, in managements opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet
payments as they become due, but in no event is it recognized after 90 days in arrears on payments
of principal or interest. Interest on mortgage loans is not recognized after four months in arrears
on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end (revolving credit)
consumer loans until the loans are charged off. When interest accrual is discontinued, unpaid
interest is reversed on all closed-end portfolios. Interest income is subsequently recognized only
to the extent that it is collected. The non accrual status is discontinued when loans are made
current by the borrower.
The Corporation leases vehicles and equipment to individual and corporate customers. The finance
method of accounting is used to recognize revenue on lease contracts that meet the criteria
specified in FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases, as amended. Aggregate rentals due over the term of the
leases less unearned income are included in lease receivable, which is part of Loans, net in the
consolidated balance sheets. Unearned income is amortized to results of operations over the lease
term so as to yield a constant rate of return on the principal amounts outstanding. Lease
origination fees and costs are deferred and amortized over the average life of the portfolio as an
adjustment to yield.
During 2009, the Corporation restructured residential real estate loans whose terms have been
modified. These loans were identified as a Trouble Debt Restructuring
(TDRs loans), as stated on FASB
ASC Topic 310, Receivables. This FASB ASC Topic states that a restructuring of a debt constitutes
a TDRs if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtors financial
difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Once a loan
is determined to be a TDR, then various effects must be considered, such as: identifying the loan
as impaired, performing an impairment analysis, applying proper revenue recognition accounting, and
reviewing its regulatory credit risk grading. Total restructured loans under this program amounted
$95.1 million as of December 31, 2009. Refer to the Allowance for Loan Losses section for further
information.
89
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into off-balance sheet instruments
consisting of commitments to extend credit, stand by letters of credit and financial guarantees.
Such financial instruments are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they are
funded or when related fees are incurred or received. The Corporation periodically evaluates the
credit risks inherent in these commitments, and establishes loss allowances for such risks if and
when these are deemed necessary.
The Corporation recognized as liabilities the fair value of the obligations undertaken in issuing
the guarantees under the standby letters of credit issued or modified after December 31, 2002, net
of the related amortization at inception. The fair value approximates the unamortized fees received
from the customers for issuing the standby letters of credit. The fees are deferred and recognized
on a straight-line basis over the commitment period. Standby letters of credit outstanding at
December 31, 2009 had terms ranging from one month to four years.
Fees received for providing loan commitments and letters of credit that result in loans are
typically deferred and amortized to interest income over the life of the related loan, beginning
with the initial borrowing. Fees on commitments and letters of credit are amortized to other
income as banking fees and commissions over the commitment period when funding is not expected.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is a current estimate of the losses inherent in the present portfolio
based on managements ongoing quarterly evaluations of the loan portfolio. Estimates of losses
inherent in the loan portfolio involve the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions. This
evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant
revision as more information becomes available. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan
losses, which is charged to expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Changes in the
allowance relating to impaired loans are charged or credited to the provision for loan losses.
Because of uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, managements estimate of credit losses
in the loan portfolio and the related allowance may change in the near term.
The Corporation follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses. This methodology consists of several key elements.
Larger commercial, construction loans and certain mortgage loans that exhibit potential or observed
credit weaknesses are subject to individual review. Where appropriate, allowances are allocated to
individual loans based on managements estimate of the borrowers ability to repay the loan given
the availability of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available to the
Corporation.
Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired as defined by FASB ASC
Topic 310 Any allowances for loans deemed impaired are measured based on the present
value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or on the fair
value of the underlying collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Commercial business,
commercial real estate, construction and mortgage loans exceeding a predetermined monetary
threshold are individually evaluated for impairment. Other loans are evaluated in homogeneous
groups and collectively evaluated for impairment. Loans that are recorded at fair value or at the
lower of cost or fair value are not evaluated for impairment. The Corporation requests updated
appraisal reports for loans that are considered impaired, either annually or every two years depending on the total exposure of the borrower and
the type of loans. As a general procedure, the
Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part of the underwriting and approval process and also
for credits considered impaired. Impaired loans for which the discounted cash flows, collateral
value or fair value exceeds its carrying value do not require an allowance. The Corporation
evaluates the collectibity of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss accrual.
Historical loss rates for commercial and consumer loans may also be adjusted for significant
factors that, in managements judgment, reflect the impact of any current condition on loss
recognition. Factors which management considers in the analysis include the effect of the national
and local economies, trends in the nature and volume of loans (delinquencies, charge-offs,
non-accrual and problem loans), changes in the internal lending policies and credit standards,
collection practices, and examination results from bank regulatory agencies and the Corporations
internal credit examiners.
Allowances on individual loans and historical loss rates are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as
necessary based on changing borrower and/or collateral conditions, actual collection, charge-off
experience and other factor that, based on management judgment, reflect the impact of any current
condition.
Effective July 1, 2009, the Corporation revised its quantitative methodology for estimating the
allowance for loan losses for the consumer and consumer finance portfolios. Through the end of the
second quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Corporations
90
quantitative methodology for estimating the allowance for loan losses for the consumer and consumer
finance portfolios was based on a historical loss rate analysis, which relied on historical loss
experience over a defined period for pools of loans with common characteristics. The revised
quantitative methodology is based on a migration analysis/roll rate and considers both historical
loss rates and loss rates based on the likelihood of credit deterioration (expectation of current
loans becoming delinquent in monthly increments until they default and are charged-off). The loss
factor estimated based on this methodology may be adjusted to incorporate seasonality attributes as
well as to reflect recent economic or business trends that may affect the collectability of the
portfolio. The loss factor is then applied to the outstanding portfolio at period end to estimate
the amount of expected charge offs and the provision for loan losses required to support an
adequate allowance for loan losses. The Corporations decision to revise and improve its
methodology was made after an evaluation of the reliability of the revised methodology including a
back testing analysis. Management believes that the revised quantitative methodology provides a
more reliable estimate of probable losses on its existing consumer and consumer finance portfolios.
The Corporation considers in its allowance for loan and lease losses, debts modification of terms
that may be identified as TDRs, as stated on FASB ASC Topic 310. This FASB ASC Topic states that a
restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor, for economic or
legal reasons related to the debtors financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor
that it would not otherwise consider. TDRs represent loans where concessions have been granted to
borrowers experiencing financial difficulties that the creditor would not otherwise consider. These
concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions,
forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. These
concessions stem from an agreement between the creditor and the debtor or are imposed by law or a
court. Classification of loan modifications as TDRs involves a degree of judgment. Indicators that
the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties include, for example: (i) the debtor is currently
in default on any of its debt; (ii) the debtor has declared or is in the process of declaring
bankruptcy; (iii) there is significant doubt as to whether the debtor will continue to be a going
concern; (iv) currently, the debtor has securities that have been delisted, are in the process of
being delisted, or are under threat of being delisted from an exchange; and (v) based on estimates
and projections that only encompass the current business capabilities, the debtor forecasts that
its entity-specific cash flows will be insufficient to service the debt (both interest and
principal) in accordance with the contractual terms of the existing agreement through maturity; and
absent the current modification, the debtor cannot obtain funds from sources other than the
existing creditors at an effective interest rate equal to the current market interest rate for
similar debt for a nontroubled debtor. The identification of TDRs is critical in the determination
of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loans classified as TDRs are reported in
non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the modification. The TDR
loan should continue in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and
ability to make the restructured loan payments (at least six months of sustained performance after
classified as TDR). Loans classified as TDRs are excluded from TDR status if performance under the
restructured terms exists for a reasonable period (at least twelve months of sustained performance
after classified) and the loan yields a market rate. The Corporation identifies as TDRs and
impaired, residential real estate loans whose terms have been modified under the conditions set
forth in FASB ASC Topic 310, as mentioned previously. Although the accounting codification guidance
for specific impairment of a loan excludes large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans that
are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g., mortgage loans), it specifically requires that
loan modifications considered TDRs be analyzed under its provisions.
For purposes of determining the impairment analysis to be applied on TDRs, the Corporation
stratifies these loans into performing loans and non-performing loans. Impairment measure in
performing loans was based on the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loans
original contractual rate. The impairment measure on non-performing loans is based on the fair
value of the collateral net of dispositions cost. During 2009, the Corporation restructured $95.1
million residential mortgage loans with allowance for loan losses of $6.1 million.
An unallocated allowance is maintained to recognize the imprecision in estimating and measuring
losses when estimating the allowance for individual loans or pools of loans.
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the transferred assets
is deemed to be surrendered: (1) the assets have been isolated from the Corporation, (2) the
transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that
right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Corporation does not maintain
effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their
maturity. The Corporation recognizes the financial assets and servicing assets it controls and the
liabilities it has incurred. At the same time, it ceases to recognize financial assets when control
has been surrendered and liabilities when they are extinguished.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization which is
computed utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets that
range between three and fifty years. Leasehold
91
improvements are stated at cost and are amortized
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets or
the term of the lease, whichever is lower. Gains or losses on dispositions are reflected in current
operations. Costs of maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend the lives of the
respective assets are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of renewals and improvements are
capitalized. When assets are sold or disposed of, their cost and related accumulated depreciation
are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in earnings when realized.
Real Estate Held for Sale
The Corporation owns certain real estate properties held for sale which are carried at the lower of
cost or fair value, less estimated selling costs.
Other Real Estate
Other real estate, normally obtained through foreclosure or other workout situations, is included
in other assets and stated at the lower of fair value or carrying value less estimated costs to
sell. Upon foreclosure, the recorded amount of the loan is written-down, if applicable, to the
fair value less estimated costs of disposal of the real estate acquired, by charging the allowance
for loan losses. Subsequent to foreclosure, any losses in the carrying value of the asset resulting
from periodic valuations of the properties are charged to expense in the period incurred. Gains or
losses on disposition of other real estate and related maintenance expenses are included in current
operations.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Corporation accounts for goodwill in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350, Intangible-Goodwill
and Others. The reporting units are tested for impairment annually to determine whether their
carrying value exceeds their fair market value. Should this be the case, the value of goodwill or
indefinite-lived intangibles may be impaired and written down. Goodwill and other indefinite lived
intangible assets are also tested for impairment on an interim basis if an event occurs or
circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of
the reporting unit below its carrying amount. If there is a determination that the fair value of
the goodwill or other identifiable intangible asset is less than the carrying value, an impairment
loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference. Impairment losses, if any, are reflected
in operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 360 Property, Plant and Equipment, the Corporation reviews
finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever an event occurs or circumstances change
which indicates that the carrying amount of such assets may not be fully recoverable. Determination
of recoverability is based on the estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use
of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an impairment loss is based on the fair
value of the asset compared to its carrying value. If the fair value of the asset is determined to
be less that the carrying value, an impairment loss is incurred in the amount equal to the
difference. Impairment losses, if any, are reflected in operating expenses in the consolidated
statements of operations.
The Corporation uses judgment in assessing goodwill and intangible assets for impairment.
Estimates of fair value are based on projections of revenues, operating costs and cash flows of
each reporting unit considering historical and anticipated future results, general economic and
market conditions as well as the impact of planned business or operational strategies. The
valuations employ a combination of present value techniques to measure fair value and consider
market factors. Generally, the Corporation engages third party specialists to assist with its
valuations. Additionally, judgment is used in determining the useful lives of finite-lived
intangible assets. Changes in judgments and projections could result in a significantly different
estimate of the fair value of the reporting units and could result in an impairment of goodwill.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Corporation adopted FASB ASC Topic 820-65, Transition related to
FASB Staff Position FAS 157-2, Effective date of FASB Statement No. 157 for fair value measurement
of goodwill, intangible assets and non-recurring measurements. The adoption of this accounting
standard for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities did not have a material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
As a result of the purchase price allocations from prior acquisitions and the Corporations
decentralized structure, goodwill is included in multiple reporting units. Due to certain factors
such as the highly competitive environment, cyclical nature of the business in some of the
reporting units, general economic and market conditions as well as planned business or operational
strategies, among others, the profitability of the Corporations individual reporting units may
periodically suffer from downturns in these factors. These factors may have a relatively more
pronounced impact on the individual reporting units as compared to the Corporation as a whole and
might adversely affect the fair value of the reporting units. If material adverse
92
conditions occur
that impact the Corporations reporting units, the Corporations reporting units, and the related
goodwill would need to be written down to an amount considered recoverable.
Mortgage-servicing Rights
Mortgage-servicing rights (MSRs) represent the cost of acquiring the contractual rights to
service loans for others. On a quarterly basis the Corporation evaluates its MSRs for impairment
and charges any such impairment to current period earnings. In order to evaluate its MSRs the
Corporation stratifies the related mortgage loans on the basis of their risk characteristics which
have been determined to be: type of loan (government-guaranteed, conventional, conforming and
non-conforming), interest rates and maturities. Impairment of MSRs is determined by estimating the
fair value of each stratum and comparing it to its carrying value. No impairment loss was
recognized for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009.
MSRs are also subject to periodic amortization. The amortization of MSRs is based on the amount
and timing of estimated cash flows to be recovered with respect to the MSRs over their expected
lives. Amortization may be accelerated or decelerated to the extent that changes in interest rates
or prepayment rates warrant.
Mortgage Banking
Mortgage loan servicing includes collecting monthly mortgagor payments, forwarding payments and
related accounting reports to investors, collecting escrow deposits for the payment of mortgagor
property taxes and insurance, and paying taxes and insurance from escrow funds when due. No asset
or liability is recorded by the Corporation for mortgages serviced, except for mortgage-servicing
rights arising from the sale of mortgages, advances to investors and escrow advances.
The Corporation recognizes as a separate asset the right to service mortgage loans for others
whenever those servicing rights are acquired. The Corporation acquires MSRs by purchasing or
originating loans and selling or securitizing those loans (with the servicing rights retained) and
allocates the total cost of the mortgage loans sold to the MSRs (included in intangible assets in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets) and the loans based on their relative fair values.
Further, mortgage-servicing rights are assessed for impairment based on the fair value of those
rights. MSRs are amortized over the estimated life of the related servicing income. Mortgage
loan-servicing fees, which are based on a percentage of the principal balances of the mortgages
serviced, are credited to income as mortgage payments are collected.
Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the unpaid principal balances of mortgage loans serviced for
others amounted to approximately $1,357,000,000 and $1,281,000,000, respectively. In connection
with these mortgage-servicing activities, the Corporation administered escrow and other custodial
funds which amounted to approximately $3,874,000 and $4,001,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Trust Services
In connection with its trust activities, the Corporation administers and is custodian of assets
amounting to approximately $131,000,000 and $200,000,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Due to the nature of trust activities, these assets are not included in the
Corporations consolidated balance sheets. The Corporations Trust Division is focusing its efforts
on transfer and paying agent and Individual Retirement Account (IRA) services.
Broker-dealer and Asset Management Commissions
Commissions of the Corporations broker-dealer operations are composed of brokerage commission
income and expenses recorded on a trade date basis and proprietary securities transactions recorded
on a trade date basis. Investment banking revenues include gains, losses and fees net of syndicate
expenses, arising from securities offerings in which the Corporation acts as an underwriter or
agent. Investment banking management fees are recorded on offering date, sales concessions on trade
date, and underwriting fees at the time the underwriting is completed and the income is reasonably
determinable. Revenues from portfolio and other management and advisory fees include fees and
advisory charges resulting from the asset management of certain funds and are recognized over the
period when services are rendered.
Insurance Commissions
The Corporations insurance agency operation earns commissions on the sale of insurance policies
issued by unaffiliated insurance companies. Commission revenue is reported net of the provision for
commission returns on insurance policy
93
cancellations, which is based on managements estimate of
future insurance policy cancellations as a result of historical turnover rates by types of credit
facilities subject to insurance.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock is recorded at cost and is carried as a reduction of stockholders equity in the
consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2009 treasury stock has not been retired or
reissued.
Income Taxes
The Corporation uses the asset and liability balance sheet method for the recognition of deferred
tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the Corporations financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income tax assets
and liabilities are determined for differences between financial statement and tax basis of assets
and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. The computation
is based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to
reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
The Corporation accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, Income
Taxes. Accordingly, the Corporation reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting
from uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Corporation
recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax
expense.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic and diluted earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income available to common
stockholders, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The
Corporations average number of common shares outstanding, used in the computation of earnings per
common share was 46,639,104 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Basic and diluted
earnings per common share are the same since no stock options or other potentially dilutive common
stock equivalents were outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements that Affect the Corporation
The adoption of these accounting pronouncements had the following impact on the Corporations
consolidated statements of operations and financial condition:
|
|
|
FASB ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events. In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic
855, which establishes general standards of accounting and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to
be issued. In particular, this Topic sets forth (i) the period after the balance sheet date
during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that
may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the
circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after
the balance sheet date in its financial statements, (iii) the disclosures that an entity
should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This
FASB ASC Topic should be applied to the accounting and disclosure of subsequent events.
This FASB ASC Topic does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the
scope of other applicable accounting standards that provide different guidance on the
accounting treatment for subsequent events or transactions. This FASB ASC Topic was
effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009.
The adoption of this Topic did not have a material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements and disclosures. |
|
|
|
|
FASB ASC Topic 105, The FASB Accounting Standard Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC Topic
105, which became the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by
nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchanges
Commissions (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of this FASB ASC Topic, the
Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.
All other non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become
non-authoritative. This FASB ASC Topic identify the sources of accounting principles and
the framework for selecting the principles used in preparing the financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Also, arranged these
sources of GAAP in a hierarchy for users to apply accordingly. In other words, the GAAP
hierarchy will be modified to include only two levels of GAAP: authoritative and
non-authoritative. This FASB ASC Topic is effective for financial statements |
94
|
|
|
issued for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of this topic did
not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements
disclosures. |
|
|
|
|
FASB ASC Topic 320-65, Transition Related to FSP FASB 115-2 and FASB 124-2, Recognition
and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB
ASC Topic 320 amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP for debt
securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve
the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity
securities in the financial statements. This FASB ASC Topic does not amend existing
recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. The FASB ASC Topic shall be effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. Earlier adoption for periods ending before March 15, 2009, is not permitted. This FASB
ASC Topic does not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative
purposes at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, this FASB ASC Topic
requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending after initial adoption. The
adoption of this Topic did not have a material impact on the Corporations consolidated
financial statements and disclosures. |
|
|
|
|
Accounting Standard Update (Update) No. 2009-12, Investment in Certain Entities that
Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent). In September 2009, the FASB
issued an Update to amend the FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculates
net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The Update permits, as a practical expedient,
a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of
the this Update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its
equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a
manner consistent with the measurement principles of FASB ASC Topic 946, Financial Services
Investment Companies, as of the reporting entitys measurement date, including
measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in
accordance with Topic 820. The Update also requires disclosures by major category of
investment about the attributes of investments within the scope this Update, such as the
nature of any restrictions on the investors ability to redeem its investments at the
measurement date, any unfunded commitments, and the investment strategies of the investees.
The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and
risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in
GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in FASB ASC Topic 320, Investments Debt
and Equity Securities. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of
this Update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the
practical expedient. This Update applies to all reporting entities that hold an investment
that is required or permitted to be measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring or
non recurring basis and, as of the reporting entitys measurement date, if the investment
meets certain criteria. This Update is effective for the interim and annual periods ending
after December 15, 2009. Early application is permitted in financial statements for earlier
interim and annual periods that have not been issued. |
The Corporation is evaluating the impact that the following recently issued accounting
pronouncements may have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
|
|
|
Accounting Standard Update (Update) No.2010-02, Accounting and Reporting for Decreases
in Ownership of a Subsidiary, an Accounting Standard Update. In January 2010, the FASB
issued a Subtopic 810-10, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.
This Update address the implementation issues related to the changes in ownership
provisions in the consolidation process. This Update establishes the accounting and
reporting guidance for noncontrolling interests and changes in ownership interests of a
subsidiary. An entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to
have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Upon deconsolidation of a
subsidiary, an entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures any
retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value. The gain or loss includes any gain or
loss associated with the difference between the fair value of the retained investment in
the subsidiary and its carrying amount at the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated. In
contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in its ownership interest of a
subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity
transaction. The amendments in this Update affect accounting and reporting by an entity
that experiences a decrease in ownership in a subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit
activity. The amendments also affect accounting and reporting by an entity that exchanges a
group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for an equity interest in
another entity. The guidance in this Update also improves the disclosures for fair value
measurements relating to retained investments in a deconsolidated subsidiary or a
preexisting interest held by an acquirer in a business combination. The amendments in this
Update are effective beginning in the period that an entity adopts this Subtopic 810-10. If
an entity has previously adopted Statement 160 as of the date the amendments in this Update
are included in the Accounting Standards Codification, the amendments in this Update are
effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after
December 15, 2009. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively to the
first period that an entity adopted Statement 160. |
|
|
|
|
Accounting Standard Update (Update) No. 2009-16, Accounting for Transfer of Financial
Assets. In June 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance under FASB ASC Topic 860,
Accounting for Transfer and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of
Liabilities, which improves the relevance, representational faithfulness, and
comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial
statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferors continuing involvement,
if any, in transferred financial assets. The Board undertook this project to address (i)
practices that have developed since the issuance of FASB ASC Topic 860, that are not
consistent with the original intent and key requirements of that statement and (ii)
concerns of financial statement users that many of the financial assets (and related
obligations) that have been derecognized should continue to be reported in the financial
statements of transferors. This additional guidance requires that a transferor recognize
and initially measure at fair value all assets obtained (including a transferors
beneficial interest) and liabilities incurred as a result of a transfer of financial assets
accounted for as a sale. Enhanced disclosures are required to provide financial statement
users with greater transparency about transfers of financial assets and a transferors
continuing involvement with transferred financial assets. This additional guidance must be
applied as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that
begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting
period and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is
prohibited. This additional guidance must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the
effective date. |
95
|
|
|
Accounting Standard Update (Update) No.2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by
Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. In June 2009, the FASB issued FASB
ASC Topic 810, which requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the
enterprises variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a
variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics (i)The
power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact
the entitys economic performance and (ii)The obligation to absorb losses of the entity
that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to
receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable
interest entity. Additionally, an enterprise is required to assess whether
it has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a variable interest entity
operates as designed when determining whether it has the power to direct the activities of
the variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance. This FASB Topic requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the
primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and eliminate the quantitative approach
previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity,
which was based on determining which enterprise absorbs the majority of the entitys
expected losses, receives a majority of the entitys expected residual returns, or both.
This FASB ASC Topic shall be effective as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first
annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that
first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter.
Earlier application is prohibited. |
|
|
|
|
Accounting Standard Update (Update) No.2010-09,Amendments to Certain Recognition and
Disclosure Requirements. In January 2010, the FASB issued an updated to amend the
Sub-topic 855-10, Subsequent Events. This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 855-10 as
follows: (1) an entity that either (a) is an SEC filer or (b) is a conduit bond obligor for
conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock
exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets) is required to
evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. If an
entity meets neither of those criteria, then it should evaluate subsequent events through
the date the financial statements are available to be issued; (2) the glossary of Topic 855
is amended to include the definition of SEC filer. An SEC filer is an entity that is
required to file or furnish its financial statements with either the SEC or, with respect
to an entity subject to Section 120) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
the appropriate agency under that Section. It does not include an entity that is not
otherwise an SEC filer whose financial statements are included in a submission by another
SEC filer; (3) an entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through
which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts
between Subtopic 855-10 and the SECs requirements; (4) the glossary of Topic 855 is
amended to remove the definition of public entity. The definition of a public entity in
Topic 855 was used to determine the date through which subsequent events should be
evaluated. Based on the amendments, that definition is no longer necessary for purposes of
Topic 855; (5) the scope of the reissuance disclosure requirements is refined to include
revised financial statements only. The term revised financial statements is added to the
glossary of Topic 855. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised
either as a result of correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. The amendments remove the requirement for an SEC filer to
disclose a date in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial
statements include financial statements revised as a result of either correction of an
error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. Additionally, the Board has clarified that
if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer
should disclose both the date that the financial statements were issued or available to be
issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued or available to be issued.
Those amendments remove potential conflicts with the SECs literature. All of the
amendments in this Update are effective upon issuance of the final Update, except for the
use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim
or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Accounting Standard Update (Update) No.2010-01, Accounting for Distribution to
Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash, an EITF Developed Accounting Standard
Update. In January 2010, the FASB issued a ASC Topic 505 to address diversity in practice
related to the accounting for a distribution to shareholders that offers them the ability
to elect to receive their entire distribution in cash or shares of equivalent value with a
potential limitation on the total amount of cash that shareholders can elect to receive in
the aggregate. Historically, some entities have accounted for the stock portion of the
distribution as a new share issuance that is reflected in earning per share (EPS)
prospectively. Other entities have accounted for the stock portion of the distribution as a
stock dividend by retroactively restating shares outstanding and EPS for all periods
presented. This Update clarify that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders
that allows them to elect to receive cash or shares with a potential limitation on the
total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is
considered a share issuance thus eliminating the diversity in practice. This Update affect
entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the
election of the shareholders with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that
all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate. Such a scenario is common for real
estate investment trusts, but this Update applies to other kinds of entities as well. This
Update clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to
elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash |
96
|
|
|
that
all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that
is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying
Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). Those distributions should be accounted
for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and
260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB ASC. The amendments in this Update are effective for
interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a
retrospective basis. |
2. Trading Securities:
Proceeds from sales of trading securities during 2009, 2008 and 2007 were approximately
$1,002,635,000, 2,215,946,000 and $2,553,127,000, respectively. Net realized gains of
approximately $1,970,000, $4,157,000 and $2,660,000 were recognized during 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. During 2009 and 2007, unrealized holding gains of $912,000 and $3,000 were
recognized, respectively. During 2008 an unrealized holding loss of $1,327,000 was recognized.
Trading gains on futures transactions of $393,000 and $168,000 were realized in 2009 and 2007,
respectively, and a loss on futures transactions of $222,000 was realized in 2008.
97
3. Investment Securities Available for Sale:
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and weighted average yield of
investment securities available for sale by contractual maturity are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Treasury and agencies of the United States
Government: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
105,521 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
105,788 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
% |
After one year to five years |
|
|
74,939 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
75,333 |
|
|
|
1.58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,460 |
|
|
|
681 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
181,121 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After one year to five years |
|
|
141,513 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,517 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its subdivisions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
After one year to five years |
|
|
71,527 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
72,355 |
|
|
|
5.10 |
% |
After five years to ten years |
|
|
6,420 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6,546 |
|
|
|
5.58 |
% |
Over ten years |
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,341 |
|
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,442 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
83,435 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over ten years |
|
|
10,239 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
414,654 |
|
|
$ |
2,978 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
417,608 |
|
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Treasury and agencies of the United States
Government: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
$ |
164,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,164 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
166,007 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
% |
After one year to five years |
|
|
5,658 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,909 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,502 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
171,916 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its subdivisions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
After one year to five years |
|
|
133,185 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
133,148 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
% |
After five years to ten years |
|
|
9,545 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
9,479 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
% |
Over ten years |
|
|
4,505 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,535 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,695 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
148,616 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After five years to ten years |
|
|
193,630 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
195,815 |
|
|
|
4.39 |
% |
Over ten years |
|
|
282,235 |
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
285,715 |
|
|
|
5.41 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,865 |
|
|
|
5,783 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
481,530 |
|
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
795,112 |
|
|
$ |
7,607 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
802,112 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
The duration of long-term (over one year) investment securities in the available for sale portfolio
is approximately 1.7 years at December 31, 2009, comprised of approximately 0.9 years for
treasuries and agencies of the United States Government, 2.3 for corporate bonds, 2.1 years for
instruments in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its subdivisions and 3.4 years for mortgage
backed securities.
The number of positions, fair value and unrealized losses at December 31, 2009 and 2008, of
investment securities available for sale that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position
for less than twelve months and for twelve months or more, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Positions |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Positions |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Positions |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Treasury and agencies
of the United States
Government |
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
20,028 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
20,028 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico and its subdivisions |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6,997 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7,352 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
20,383 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
6,997 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
27,380 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
of |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Positions |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Positions |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Positions |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Treasury and agencies
of the United States
Government |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico and its subdivisions |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
19,338 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
20,043 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
33,091 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
33,091 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
30,705 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
52,429 |
|
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
$ |
83,134 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation evaluates its investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a
quarterly basis or earlier if other factors indicate that potential impairment exists. An
impairment charge in the consolidated statements of operations is recognized when the decline in
the fair value of the securities below their cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary. The
Corporation considers various factors in determining whether it should recognize an impairment
charge, including, but not limited to the length of time and extent to which the fair value has
been less than its cost basis, expectation of recoverability of its original investment in the
securities and the Corporations intent to sell and the situation that it most likely-than-not
that the Corporation will be required to sell the security prior to recovery of the carrying
amount of the investment.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, management concluded that there was no other-than-temporary
impairment in its investment securities portfolio.
The unrealized losses in the Corporations investments in debt securities were caused by changes in
market interest rates and not credit quality. All debt securities are investment grade, as rated by
major rating agencies. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to
settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. The Corporation
evaluates debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment based on any of the following
triggering events (1) the Corporation has the intent to sell the security, (2) it is more likely
than not that the Corporation will be required to sell the security before recovery, or (3) the
Corporation does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Upon
evaluation of these triggering events, the Corporation believes that none of such conditions are
present at December 31, 2009 and 2008 because the Corporation has sufficient capital and liquidity
to operate its business and it has no requirements or needs
99
to sell such securities, and the Corporation is not subject to any contractual arrangements that
would require the Corporation to sell such securities.
Contractual maturities on certain securities, including mortgage-backed securities, could differ
from actual maturities since certain issuers may have the right to call or prepay these
securities.
The weighted average yield on investment securities available for sale is based on amortized cost,
therefore it does not give effect to changes in fair value.
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale were approximately $507,256,000,
$129,451,000 and $149,413,000 in 2009,2008 and 2007, respectively. Gains of approximately
$9,251,000, $5,154,000 and $1,265,000 were realized in 2009 and 2008, respectively.
4. Assets Pledged:
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, investment securities and loans were pledged to secure deposits of
public funds and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. The classification and carrying amount of pledged
assets, which the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge as of December 31 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
156,982 |
|
|
$ |
227,658 |
|
Other investment securities |
|
|
47,700 |
|
|
|
53,325 |
|
Loans |
|
|
2,309,556 |
|
|
|
2,511,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,514,238 |
|
|
$ |
2,792,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities that the creditor has the right or contract to repledge, are presented
separately on the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2008, investment securities with a
carrying value of approximately $408,650,000 were pledged to securities sold under agreements to
repurchase.
5. Loans:
The Corporations loan portfolio at December 31 consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
1,947,809 |
|
|
$ |
2,165,613 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
443,567 |
|
|
|
565,833 |
|
Consumer finance |
|
|
783,510 |
|
|
|
996,919 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
36,624 |
|
|
|
64,065 |
|
Construction |
|
|
70,879 |
|
|
|
194,596 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
2,385,592 |
|
|
|
2,553,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,667,981 |
|
|
|
6,540,354 |
|
Net unearned income and deferred (fee)/costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, industrial and others |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
Consumer finance |
|
|
(224,562 |
) |
|
|
(418,676 |
) |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(197,303 |
) |
|
|
(191,889 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
$ |
5,246,444 |
|
|
$ |
5,929,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation sold certain loans including some
classified as impaired to an affiliate for $142.0 million in cash. These loans had a net book value
of $142.0 million comprised of an outstanding principal balance of $149.2 million and a specific
valuation allowance of $7.2 million. The type of loans sold, at net book value, was $65.5 million
in construction loans, $61.2 million in commercial loans and $15.3 million in mortgage loans.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Corporation sold certain loans including some
classified as impaired to an affiliate for $300.1 million in cash. These loans had a net book value
of $300.1 million comprised of an outstanding principal balance of $334.6 million and a specific
valuation allowance of $34.5 million. The type of loans sold at net book value, was $212.3 million
in construction loans and $87.8 million in commercial loans. No gain or loss was recognized on
these transactions.
At December 31, the recorded investment in loans that were considered impaired is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Impaired loans which require allowance |
|
$ |
176,181 |
|
|
$ |
77,562 |
|
Impaired loans that did not require allowance |
|
|
76,178 |
|
|
|
23,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
252,359 |
|
|
$ |
100,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans |
|
$ |
28,843 |
|
|
$ |
18,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans measured based on fair value
of collateral |
|
$ |
159,322 |
|
|
$ |
87,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans measured based on discounted
cash flows |
|
$ |
93,037 |
|
|
$ |
13,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
$ |
554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average balance of impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
approximately $156.1 million and $143 million, respectively.
The following schedule reflects the approximate outstanding principal amount and the effect on
earnings of non-accruing loans and past due loans still on an interest accrual basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Principal balance as of December 31 |
|
$ |
289,846 |
|
|
$ |
212,714 |
|
|
$ |
294,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income which would have been recorded had the
loans not been classified as non-accruing |
|
$ |
11,888 |
|
|
$ |
9,268 |
|
|
$ |
7,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing
interest |
|
$ |
11,214 |
|
|
$ |
13,462 |
|
|
$ |
7,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
6. Allowance for Loan Losses:
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
191,889 |
|
|
$ |
166,952 |
|
|
$ |
106,863 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
152,496 |
|
|
|
175,523 |
|
|
|
147,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344,385 |
|
|
|
342,475 |
|
|
|
254,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses charged to the allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
21,536 |
|
|
|
17,782 |
|
|
|
10,375 |
|
Construction |
|
|
2,459 |
|
|
|
32,257 |
|
|
|
2,710 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
7,340 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
55,565 |
|
|
|
44,682 |
|
|
|
29,281 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
63,322 |
|
|
|
56,444 |
|
|
|
44,484 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
2,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,023 |
|
|
|
154,486 |
|
|
|
91,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
1,517 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off |
|
|
147,082 |
|
|
|
150,586 |
|
|
|
87,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
197,303 |
|
|
$ |
191,889 |
|
|
$ |
166,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Premises and Equipment:
The Corporations premises and equipment at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in years |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,251 |
|
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
8,172 |
|
|
|
1,110 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
3-10 |
|
|
|
41,574 |
|
|
|
43,649 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
Various |
|
|
29,573 |
|
|
|
30,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,570 |
|
|
|
76,026 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,391 |
) |
|
|
(56,658 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and Equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,179 |
|
|
$ |
19,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 were approximately $6.0 million, $7.2 million and $8.1 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation owned 19 facilities, which consisted of eleven branches
and eight parking lots. The Corporation occupies 122 leased branch premises, while warehouse space
is rented in one location. In addition, office spaces
102
are rented at Torre Santander building in Hato Rey Puerto Rico, at the Santander Tower in Galeria
San Patricio building, in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, at Professional Office Park IV building, in Río
Piedras, Puerto Rico and at the Operational Center in
Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. The Corporations management believes that each of its facilities is well
maintained and suitable for its purpose.
8. Real Estate Held for Sale:
The Corporation owns certain real estate properties held for sale which are carried at the lower of
cost or fair value, less estimated selling cost.
During 2009 and 2008, the Corporation had $2.8 million and $8.1 million, respectively, of real
estate held for sale. During 2009, eight sites which were previously classified as held for
disposition were reclassified to Property and Equipment because these sites are no longer being
actively marketed for sale. The effect on the consolidated statements of operations related to the
reclassification of these sites from real estate held for sale was limited to depreciation expense
and was not material.
9. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
Goodwill
The Corporation has assigned goodwill to reporting units at the time of acquisition. Goodwill was
allocated to the Commercial Banking segment, the Wealth Management segment and the Consumer Finance
segment as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
$ |
10,537 |
|
|
$ |
10,537 |
|
Wealth Management |
|
|
24,254 |
|
|
|
24,254 |
|
Consumer Finance |
|
|
86,691 |
|
|
|
86,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
121,482 |
|
|
$ |
121,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill assigned to the Commercial Banking segment is related to the acquisition of Banco Central
Hispano Puerto Rico in 1996, the goodwill assigned to the Wealth Management segment is related to
the acquisition of Merrill Lynchs retail brokerage business in Puerto Rico by Santander Securities
Corporation in 2000 and the goodwill assigned to the Consumer Finance segment is related to the
acquisition of Island Finance in 2006. The Corporation performed its annual impairment assessments
as of October 1, 2009, 2008 and 2007 with the assistance of the independent valuation specialist.
Based on managements assessment of the value of the Corporations goodwill at October 1, 2009,
2008 and 2007, which includes an independent valuation, among others, management determined that
the Corporations goodwill and other intangibles were impaired in 2007.
As a result of the unfavorable economic environment in Puerto Rico, Island Finances short-term
financial performance and profitability declined significantly during 2007, caused by reduced
lending activity and increases in non-performing assets and charge-offs. The Corporation, with the
assistance of an independent valuation firm, performed an interim impairment test of the goodwill
and other intangibles of Island Finance as of July 1, 2007. FASB ASC Topic 350 provides a two-step
impairment test. The first step of the impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit
with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds
its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount
of the impairment loss, if any. The Corporation completed the first step of the impairment test and
determined that the carrying amount of the goodwill and other intangible assets of Island Finance
exceeded their fair value, thereby requiring performance of the second step of the impairment test
to calculate the amount of the impairment. Based upon the completed impairment test, the
Corporation determined that the actual non-cash impairment charges as of July 1, 2007 were $43.3
million, which included $26.8 of goodwill and $16.5 million of other intangibles assets (comprised
of $9.2 million of customer relationships, $5.4 million of trade name and $1.9 million of
non-compete agreement). These impairment charges did not result in cash expenditures and will not
result in future cash expenditures.
103
The gross carrying value and accumulated impaired loss to goodwill at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount |
|
|
Impairment Charges |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance at beginning of the year |
|
$ |
148,300 |
|
|
$ |
26,818 |
|
|
$ |
121,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the year |
|
$ |
148,300 |
|
|
$ |
26,818 |
|
|
$ |
121,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets at December 31, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial Banking Mortgage-servicing rights |
|
$ |
9,686 |
|
|
$ |
10,175 |
|
Wealth Management Advisory-servicing rights |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
Consumer Finance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name |
|
|
18,300 |
|
|
|
18,300 |
|
Non-compete agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,948 |
|
|
$ |
29,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-servicing rights arise from the right to service mortgages sold and have an estimated
useful life of eight years. The advisory-servicing rights are related to the Corporations
subsidiary acquisition of the right to serve as the investment advisor for First Puerto Rico
Tax-Exempt Fund, Inc. acquired in 2002 and for First Puerto Rico Growth and Income Fund Inc. and
First Puerto Rico Daily Liquidity Fund Inc. acquired in December 2006. These intangible assets are
being amortized over a 10-year estimated useful life. Trade name is related to the acquisition of
Island Finance and has an indefinite useful life and is therefore not being amortized but is tested
for impairment at least annually. Non-compete agreement was an intangible asset related to the
acquisition of Island Finance. The non-compete agreement has been fully amortized.
The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets at December 31:
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Impairment Charges |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial Banking Mortgage-servicing
rights |
|
$ |
20,286 |
|
|
$ |
10,600 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,686 |
|
Wealth Management Advisory-servicing rights |
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
962 |
|
Consumer Finance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name |
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
18,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,036 |
|
|
$ |
12,688 |
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
|
|
$ |
28,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Impairment Charges |
|
|
Carrying Amount |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Commercial Banking Mortgage-servicing
rights |
|
$ |
18,382 |
|
|
$ |
8,207 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,175 |
|
Wealth Management Advisory-servicing rights |
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,267 |
|
Consumer Finance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name |
|
|
23,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
18,300 |
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
3,256 |
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,432 |
|
|
$ |
13,246 |
|
|
$ |
7,344 |
|
|
$ |
29,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of the other intangible assets for the period ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
were approximately $2.8 million, $3.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively.
The estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years and thereafter of the
finite lived intangible assets is the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
( in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
2,498 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,351 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,998 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,347 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,129 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
105
10. Other Assets:
Other assets at December 31 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Deferred tax assets, net (See note 17) |
|
$ |
54,793 |
|
|
$ |
56,542 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for
claim receivable
of $25.1 million in 2008 |
|
|
45,368 |
|
|
|
40,581 |
|
Repossesed assets, net |
|
|
34,486 |
|
|
|
22,306 |
|
Software, net |
|
|
7,643 |
|
|
|
7,295 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
13,272 |
|
|
|
13,835 |
|
Prepaid FDIC insurance |
|
|
25,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax credit, net |
|
|
15,350 |
|
|
|
19,645 |
|
Customers liabilities on acceptances |
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
Derivative assets (See note 22) |
|
|
118,788 |
|
|
|
197,192 |
|
Confirming advances |
|
|
113,692 |
|
|
|
122,540 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,916 |
|
|
|
5,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
435,463 |
|
|
$ |
485,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of software assets for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was
approximately $3.6 million, $4.8 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
The Corporation had counterparty exposure to Lehman Brothers, Inc. (LBI) in connection with the
sale of securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounting to $200.2 million at September 19,
2008 under a Master Repurchase Agreement. LBI was placed in a Securities Investor Protection
Corporation (SIPC) liquidation proceeding on September 19, 2008. The filing of the SIPC
liquidation proceeding was an event of default under the terms of the Master Repurchase Agreement,
which resulted in the acceleration of repurchase dates under the Master Repurchase Agreement to
September 19, 2008. This action resulted in a reduction in the Corporations total assets of
$225.3 million and a reduction in its total liabilities of $200.2 million in 2008. During 2009, the
Corporation filed a claim for the amount $25.1 million, which is the amount it is owed by LBI as a
result of the acceleration of the repurchase date and the exercise by the Corporation of its rights
under the Master Repurchase Agreement, plus incidental expenses and damages. During 2008, the
Corporation recognized a claim receivable from LBI for $25.1 million and has established a
valuation allowance for the same amount since management, in consultation with legal counsel,
believed that based on current information and events, it was probable that the Corporation will be
unable to collect all amounts due. The tax effect related to the recognition of this valuation
allowance was a deferred tax benefit of $9.8 million. Management, in consultation with legal
counsel, believes that based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation
will be unable to collect all amounts due. During the last quarter of 2009, management decided to
write-off the $25.1 claim receivable and derecognized the valuation allowance for the same amount
as of December 31, 2009. Also, the deferred tax assets of $9.8 million was reversed.
The Law 197 of Puerto Rico (Law 197) of 2007 grants certain credits to home buyers on the
purchase of certain qualified new or existing homes. The incentives were as follows: (a) for a
newly constructed home that will constitute the individuals principal residence, a credit equal to
20% of the sales price or $25,000, whichever is lower; (b) for newly constructed homes that will
not constitute the individuals principal residence, a credit of 10% of the sales price or $15,000,
whichever is lower; and (c) for existing homes a credit of 10% of the sales price or $10,000,
whichever is lower. The loan tax credits were generally granted to home buyers by the financial
institutions financing the home acquisition and later claimed on the financial institutions tax
return as a tax credit. Credits available under Law 197 needed to be certified by the Puerto Rico
Secretary of Treasury and the total amount of credits available under the law was $220,000,000,
which was depleted in December of 2008.
106
The loan tax credits do not expire and may be used against income taxes, including estimated
income taxes, for tax years commencing after December 31, 2007 in three installments, subject to
certain limitations. In addition, the loan tax tax credits may be ceded, sold or otherwise
transferred to any other person; and any tax credit not used in a given tax year, may be claimed as
a refund but only for taxable years commencing after December 31, 2010. The Corporation had $15.4
million of unused loan tax credits certified by the Secretary at December 31, 2009.
The FDIC amended its regulations requiring insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly
risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. The
prepaid assessment of $25.8 million for these periods was paid on December 31, 2009, along with the
Corporations regular quarterly risk-based deposit insurance assessment for the third quarter of
2009.
11. Deposits:
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, interest-bearing deposits, including time deposits, amounted to
$3,697 million and $4,322 million, respectively. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, time deposits
amounted to approximately $1,669 million and $2,617 million, respectively, of which approximately
$105 million and $299 million, respectively, mature after one year.
Maturities of time deposits for the next five years and thereafter follow:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,564,084 |
|
2011 |
|
|
64,829 |
|
2012 |
|
|
25,010 |
|
2013 |
|
|
6,375 |
|
2014 |
|
|
7,272 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,669,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
The detail of deposits and interest expense are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
Interest |
|
Carrying |
|
Interest |
|
Carrying |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Expense |
|
Amount |
|
Expense |
|
Amount |
|
Expense |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non interest bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private demand |
|
$ |
698,488 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
692,681 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
755,077 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Public demand |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
698,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
692,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings |
|
|
827,032 |
|
|
|
9,369 |
|
|
|
675,885 |
|
|
|
16,923 |
|
|
|
608,195 |
|
|
|
20,673 |
|
NOW and other transactions |
|
|
1,200,696 |
|
|
|
9,647 |
|
|
|
1,029,206 |
|
|
|
18,021 |
|
|
|
1,025,490 |
|
|
|
31,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,027,728 |
|
|
|
19,016 |
|
|
|
1,705,091 |
|
|
|
34,944 |
|
|
|
1,633,685 |
|
|
|
51,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under $100,000 |
|
|
165,302 |
|
|
|
6,940 |
|
|
|
254,368 |
|
|
|
8,886 |
|
|
|
271,782 |
|
|
|
13,715 |
|
$100,000 and over |
|
|
1,503,761 |
|
|
|
53,517 |
|
|
|
2,362,480 |
|
|
|
108,622 |
|
|
|
2,499,779 |
|
|
|
127,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,669,063 |
|
|
|
60,457 |
|
|
|
2,616,848 |
|
|
|
117,508 |
|
|
|
2,771,561 |
|
|
|
140,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,395,560 |
|
|
$ |
79,473 |
|
|
$ |
5,014,902 |
|
|
$ |
152,452 |
|
|
$ |
5,160,703 |
|
|
$ |
192,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
12. Other Borrowings:
Following are summaries of borrowings as of and for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Federal Funds |
|
|
Securities Sold |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
Purchased and |
|
|
Under Agreements |
|
|
Paper |
|
|
|
Other Borrowings |
|
|
to Repurchase |
|
|
Issued |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount outstanding at year-end |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
67,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average indebtedness outstanding during the year |
|
$ |
14,824 |
|
|
$ |
76,849 |
|
|
$ |
90,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding during the year |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate for the year |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate at year-end |
|
|
0.21 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Federal Funds |
|
|
Securities Sold |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
Purchased and |
|
|
Under Agreements |
|
|
Paper |
|
|
|
Other Borrowings |
|
|
to Repurchase |
|
|
Issued |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount outstanding at year-end |
|
$ |
2,040 |
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average indebtedness outstanding during the year |
|
$ |
190,097 |
|
|
$ |
523,873 |
|
|
$ |
209,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding during the year |
|
$ |
751,000 |
|
|
$ |
625,006 |
|
|
$ |
625,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate for the year |
|
|
4.21 |
% |
|
|
4.87 |
% |
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate at year-end |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase
and commercial paper issued mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within thirty days |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Over ninety days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within thirty days |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Thirty to ninety days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Over ninety days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within thirty days |
|
$ |
67,482 |
|
|
$ |
50,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108
As of December 31, 2008 the weighted average maturity of Federal funds purchased and other
borrowings over ninety days was 11.97 months.
As of December 31, 2008, securities sold under agreements to repurchase (classified by
counterparty) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance of |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
in Months |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
408,650 |
|
|
|
10.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following investment securities were sold under agreements to repurchase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Balance of |
|
|
Underlying |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
Underlying Securities |
|
Securities |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
408,650 |
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
408,650 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Federal Home Loan Bank Advances:
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-callable advances at 2.63% average fixed rate with maturities during 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
310,000 |
|
Non-callable advances at 2.33% and 2.98% average fixed rate with maturities during 2010 |
|
|
735,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Non-callable advances at 3.85% average fixed rate with maturities during 2011 |
|
|
325,000 |
|
|
|
325,000 |
|
Non-callable
advances at 4.28% average floating rate tied to 3-month LIBOR with maturities during 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,060,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,185,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation had $2.0 billion and $2.1 billion in mortgage loans and investment securities
pledged as collateral for Federal Home Loan Bank advances as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
109
14. Term Notes, Subordinated Capital Notes and Trust Preferred Securities:
Term notes payable outstanding at December 31, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Term notes
maturing January 29, 2010 linked to the S&P 500 index |
|
$ |
4,815 |
|
|
$ |
4,815 |
|
Term notes maturing May 31, 2011 with a spread of 0.25%: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linked to
the S&P 500 |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Linked to the Dow Jones Euro STOXX 50 |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Term notes maturing May 25, 2012 linked to the Euro STOXX 50 |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Term notes maturing May 25, 2012 linked to the NIKKEI |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,815 |
|
|
|
21,815 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(1,234 |
) |
|
|
(1,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,581 |
|
|
$ |
19,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Capital Notes
Subordinated capital notes at December 31 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Subordinated notes with fixed interest of 7.50% maturing December 10, 2028 |
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
|
$ |
60,000 |
|
Subordinated notes with fixed interest of 6.30% maturing June 1, 2032, at fair value |
|
|
73,122 |
|
|
|
72,076 |
|
Subordinated notes with fixed interest of 6.10% maturing June 1, 2032, at fair value |
|
|
47,429 |
|
|
|
46,206 |
|
Subordinated notes with fixed interest of 6.75% maturing July 1, 2036 |
|
|
129,000 |
|
|
|
129,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,551 |
|
|
|
307,282 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
308,691 |
|
|
$ |
306,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities
At December 31, 2006, the Corporation had established a trust for the purpose of issuing trust
preferred securities to the public in connection with the acquisition of Island Finance. In
connection with this financing arrangement, the Corporation completed the private placement of $125
million Preferred Securities and issued Junior Subordinated Debentures in the aggregate principal
amount of $129 million in connection with the issuance of the Preferred Securities. The Preferred
Securities are classified as subordinated notes (included on the table for subordinated capital
notes above) and the dividends are classified as interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
15. Reserve Fund:
The Banking Law of Puerto Rico requires that a reserve fund be created and that annual transfers of
at least 10% of the Banks annual net income be made, until such fund equals 100% of total paid-in
capital, on common and preferred stock. Such transfers restrict the retained earnings, which would
otherwise be available for dividends. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the reserve fund amounted to
approximately $141.8 million and $139.3 million, respectively.
110
16. Common Stock Transactions:
During 2008, the Corporation declared and paid a cash dividend of $0.20 per common share,
respectively. The current annualized dividend yield was 1.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In light of the continuing challenging general economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the global
capital markets, the Board of Directors of the Corporation voted during August 2008 to discontinue
the payment of the quarterly cash dividend on the Corporations common stock to strengthen the
institutions core capital position. The Corporations decision is part of the significant actions
it has proactively taken in order to face the on-going challenges presented by the Puerto Rico
economy. While each of the Corporation and its banking subsidiary remain above well capitalized
ratios, these prudent measures will preserve and continue to reinforce the Corporations capital
position.
The Corporation adopted and implemented Stock Repurchase Programs in May 2000, December 2000 and
June 2001. Under these programs, the Corporation acquired 3% of its then outstanding common
shares. During November 2002, the Corporation started a fourth Stock Repurchase Program under which
it may acquire up to 3% of its outstanding common shares. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, a
total of 4,011,260 common shares with a cost of approximately $67,552,000 had been repurchased
under these programs and are recorded as treasury stock in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
The Corporation started a Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan in May 2000 under which
holders of common stock have the opportunity to automatically invest cash dividends to purchase
more shares of the Corporation. Stockholders may also make, as frequently as once a month,
optional cash payments for investment in additional shares of common stock.
17. Income Tax:
The Corporation is subject to regular or the alternative minimum tax, whichever is higher. The
effective tax rate is lower than the statutory rate primarily because interest income on certain
United States and Puerto Rico debt securities is exempt from Puerto Rico income taxes.
The Corporation is also subject to federal income tax on its United States (U.S.) source income.
However, the Corporation had no taxable U.S. income for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009. The Corporation is not subject to federal income tax on U.S. Treasury
securities that qualify as portfolio interest.
On July 2009, the Governor of Puerto Rico signed Act No. 37, which amends Act No. 7 of March 9,
2009. This law imposed a temporary three-year surcharge of 5% commencing on taxable year 2009.
Since the 5% surcharge is imposed on the tax liability instead of the income subject to tax, the
effect of the 5% surcharge will be that during the temporary period, the 39% maximum statutory
marginal corporate income tax rate effectively increased to 40.95%. Also, the amendments of Act No.
7 of March 9, 2009, particularly to alternative minimum tax (AMT), eliminates the deduction for
professional services expenses incurred outside Puerto Rico unless these payments are subject to
income tax in Puerto Rico.
The components of the provision for income tax for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Current tax provision |
|
$ |
11,870 |
|
|
$ |
11,559 |
|
|
$ |
28,037 |
|
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
(18,083 |
) |
|
|
(23,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income tax |
|
$ |
11,335 |
|
|
$ |
(6,524 |
) |
|
$ |
4,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between the income tax provision (benefit) and the amount computed using the
statutory rate is due to the following:
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax at statutory rate |
|
$ |
21,544 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
$ |
1,563 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
$ |
(12,496 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
%) |
Benefits of net tax exempt income |
|
|
(2,379 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
(5,917 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
%) |
|
|
(6,247 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
%) |
Deferred tax valuation allowance change |
|
|
(6,146 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
%) |
|
|
(2,458 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
%) |
|
|
23,103 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate |
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(3,267 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
%) |
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income tax |
|
$ |
11,335 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
(6,524 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
%) |
|
$ |
4,204 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income
tax purposes. Significant components of the Corporations deferred tax assets and liabilities at
December 31, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Deferred Tax Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of mortgage loans |
|
$ |
2,639 |
|
|
$ |
2,869 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
43,618 |
|
|
|
39,613 |
|
Long term incentive plans |
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
3,939 |
|
Deferred gain on sale of properties |
|
|
4,274 |
|
|
|
4,560 |
|
Postretirement and pension benefits |
|
|
14,931 |
|
|
|
18,126 |
|
Reserve for insurance cancellations |
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
Valuation on claim receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,797 |
|
Alternative minimum tax |
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for
repossessed assets |
|
|
6,557 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,647 |
|
|
|
6,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,746 |
|
|
|
90,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
(971 |
) |
Unrealized gain on investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(1,777 |
) |
Unrealized gain on derivatives |
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(1,972 |
) |
Valuation subordinated note |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
(2,620 |
) |
Goodwill and other intangibles |
|
|
(7,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-servicing rights and other |
|
|
(3,033 |
) |
|
|
(5,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,364 |
) |
|
|
(13,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(14,589 |
) |
|
|
(20,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
$ |
54,793 |
|
|
$ |
56,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Puerto Rico Income Tax Law, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as
separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns.
In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate
realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during
the periods in which the temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the
scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning
strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and
projections for future taxable income, management believes it is more likely than not, the
Corporation will not realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets related to Santander Financial
Services, Inc. and Santander Bancorp (parent company only) amounting to $14.5 million and $0.1
million, respectively, at December 31, 2009 and $20.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively, at
December 31, 2008. Accordingly, a deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $14.5 million
and $0.1 million at December 31, 2009 and $20.6 million and $0.1 million at December 31, 2008, for
Santander Financial Services, Inc and Santander Bancorp (parent company only), respectively, were
recorded.
112
Under the Puerto Rico Income Tax Law, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate
taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns.
The Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 740 on January 1, 2007. A reconciliation
of beginning and ending amount of the accrual for uncertain income tax positions, including
interest and penalties, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Balance at begining of the year |
|
$ |
31,570 |
|
|
$ |
16,507 |
|
|
$ |
12,676 |
|
Gross increases for tax positions of prior years |
|
|
4,153 |
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
2,980 |
|
Gross decreases for tax positions of prior year |
|
|
(1,664 |
) |
|
|
(1,931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gross increases for tax positions of current year |
|
|
4,564 |
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
2,424 |
|
Release of contingencies |
|
|
(7,868 |
) |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the year |
|
$ |
30,755 |
|
|
$ |
31,570 |
|
|
$ |
16,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations policy is to report interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits
in income tax expense. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation
recognized $1.8 million, $1.3 million and $1.4 million of interest and penalties, respectively, for
uncertain tax positions. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the related accrued interest amounted to
approximated $3.2 million and $3.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the
Corporation had $8.1 million and $10.3 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits which,
if recognized, would decrease the effective income tax rate in future periods.
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons
including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due
to the statutes of limitation, changes in managements judgment about the level of uncertainty,
status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity, and the addition or elimination of
uncertain tax positions. As of December 31, 2009, the years 2005 through 2008 remain subject to
examination by the Puerto Rico tax authorities. The Corporation does not anticipate a significant
change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
18. Contingencies and Commitments:
The Corporation is involved as plaintiff or defendant in a variety of routine litigation incidental
to the normal course of business. Management believes, based on the opinion of legal counsel, that
it has adequate defense with respect to such litigation and that any losses therefrom will not have
a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial
position of the Corporation.
The Corporation leases certain operating facilities under non-cancelable operating leases,
including leases with related parties, and has other agreements expiring at various dates through
2027. Rent expense charged to operations related to these leases was approximately $15,559,000,
$13,570,000 and $10,271,000
for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. At December 31, 2009, the minimum unexpired commitments for
leases and other commitments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Leases |
|
|
Other commitments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
13,143 |
|
|
$ |
17,790 |
|
|
$ |
30,933 |
|
2011 |
|
|
11,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,590 |
|
2012 |
|
|
10,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,564 |
|
2013 |
|
|
9,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,842 |
|
2014 |
|
|
9,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,128 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
50,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104,616 |
|
|
$ |
17,790 |
|
|
$ |
122,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
19. Employee Benefits Plan:
Pension Plan
The Corporation maintains two inactive qualified noncontributory defined benefit pension plans. One
plan covers substantially all active employees of the Corporation (the Plan) before January 1,
2007, while the other plan was assumed in connection with the 1996 acquisition of Banco Central
Hispano de Puerto Rico (the BCH). The Corporations Plan uses a December 31 measurement date for
both plans.
The Corporation requires recognition of a plans over-funded or under-funded status as an asset or
liability with an offsetting adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) pursuant the
FASB ASC Topic 715. Actuarial gains or losses, prior service costs and transition assets or
obligations will be subsequently recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs.
Additional minimum pension liabilities (AMPL) and related intangible assets are derecognized upon
adoption of the standard.
Amounts included in AOCL (pre-tax) as of December 31, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
Plans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net transition asset |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
38,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
The amounts in AOCL that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost
during 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
Plans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Amortization of net transition asset |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following presents other changes in plan assets and benefit obligation recognized in AOLC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net loss (gain) |
|
$ |
(2,908 |
) |
|
$ |
13,577 |
|
Amortization of net gain |
|
|
(1,171 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
Amortization of transition obligation |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(4,077 |
) |
|
$ |
13,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
The following presents the funded status of the Corporations Plan at December 31, based on the
actuarial assumptions described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Change in projected benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
40,415 |
|
|
$ |
36,923 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
2,820 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(1,898 |
) |
|
|
(1,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year |
|
|
42,165 |
|
|
|
40,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
|
28,019 |
|
|
|
35,740 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
6,297 |
|
|
|
(8,028 |
) |
Employer contributions |
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
Benefit paid |
|
|
(1,898 |
) |
|
|
(1,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
|
34,251 |
|
|
|
28,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
|
(7,914 |
) |
|
|
(12,396 |
) |
Net actuarial loss |
|
|
16,024 |
|
|
|
20,103 |
|
Net transition asset |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
8,097 |
|
|
$ |
7,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized on the consolidated balance sheets consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability |
|
$ |
(7,914 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,396 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
16,011 |
|
|
|
20,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
8,097 |
|
|
$ |
7,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in minimum liability included in
other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(4,077 |
) |
|
$ |
13,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
42,165 |
|
|
$ |
40,415 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
$ |
42,165 |
|
|
$ |
40,415 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
$ |
34,251 |
|
|
$ |
28,019 |
|
For each of the three years in the period ended December 31, the pension costs for the
Corporations Plan included the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
2,359 |
|
|
$ |
2,355 |
|
|
$ |
2,279 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
(2,729 |
) |
|
|
(2,718 |
) |
Net loss amortization |
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension (benefit) cost |
|
$ |
1,428 |
|
|
$ |
(145 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligation for the Corporations Plan as of December 31,
included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.91 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost for the Corporations Plan as of December
31 included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
7.50 |
% |
|
|
7.50 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption, the Corporation evaluated input
from the consultant and the Corporations long-term inflation assumptions and interest rate
scenarios. Projected returns by consultant are based on the same asset categories as the plan using
well known broad indices. Expected returns are based by historical returns with adjustments to
reflect a more realistic future return. Adjustments are done by categories taking into
consideration current and future market conditions. The Corporation also considered historical
returns on its plan assets. The Corporation anticipates that the Plans portfolio will generate
annual long term rate of returns of at least 7.50%.
The Corporations Plan asset allocations at December 31, by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Asset Category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected contribution to the Corporations Plan for 2010 is $3,173,000.
116
The following presents the funded status of the BCH Plan at December 31, based on the actuarial
assumptions described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Change in projected benefit obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
$ |
32,746 |
|
|
$ |
32,931 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
Actuarial gain |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(470 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year |
|
|
32,448 |
|
|
|
32,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
|
21,560 |
|
|
|
27,625 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
(6,298 |
) |
Employer contributions |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
1,956 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
|
26,293 |
|
|
|
21,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
|
(6,155 |
) |
|
|
(11,186 |
) |
Net actuarial loss |
|
|
22,267 |
|
|
|
26,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
16,112 |
|
|
$ |
15,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized on the consolidated balance sheets consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability, net of prepaid benefit cost |
|
$ |
(6,155 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,186 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
22,267 |
|
|
|
26,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
$ |
16,112 |
|
|
$ |
15,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in minimum liability included
in other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
(4,014 |
) |
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
32,448 |
|
|
$ |
32,746 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
|
$ |
32,448 |
|
|
$ |
32,746 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
$ |
26,293 |
|
|
$ |
21,560 |
|
For each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and November 30, 2007,
the pension costs for the BCH Plan included the following components. Effective November 30, 1996,
the benefits in this plan were frozen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
|
$ |
1,853 |
|
|
$ |
1,838 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(1,612 |
) |
|
|
(2,092 |
) |
|
|
(2,170 |
) |
Net loss amortization |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
The following presents other changes in plan assets and benefit obligation recognized in AOLC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net loss (gain) |
|
$ |
(3,257 |
) |
|
$ |
8,095 |
|
Amortization of net loss (gain) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(563 |
) |
Amortization of transition obligation (asset) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprhensive income |
|
$ |
(4,014 |
) |
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine benefit obligation for the BCH Plan as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
and November 30, 2007 included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
5.80 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost for the BCH Plan as of December 31, 2009
and 2008 and November 30, 2007 included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
7.50 |
% |
|
|
7.50 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In developing the expected long-term rate of return assumption, the Corporation evaluated input
from the BCH Plans consultant and the Corporations long-term inflation assumptions and interest
rate scenarios. Projected returns by consultant are based on the same asset categories as the plan
using well known broad indices. Expected returns are based by historical returns with adjustments
to reflect a more realistic future return. Adjustments are done by categories taking into
consideration current and future market conditions. The Corporation also considered historical
returns on BCH Plan assets. The Corporation anticipates that the BCH Plans portfolio will generate
annual long term rate of returns of at least 7.50%.
The Corporations asset allocations for the BCH Plan at December 31 by asset category are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Asset Category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected contribution to the BCH Plan for 2010 is $1,086,000.
The Corporations investment policy with respect to the Corporations Plan and the BCH Plan is to
optimize, without undue risk, the total return on investment of the Plan assets after inflation,
within a framework of prudent and reasonable portfolio risk. The investment portfolio is
diversified in multiple asset classes to reduce portfolio risk, and assets may be shifted between
asset classes to reduce volatility when warranted by projections of the economic and/or financial
market environment,
118
consistent with ERISA diversification principles. The Corporations target
asset allocations for both plans are 60% equity and 40% fixed/variable income. As circumstances and
market conditions change, these allocations may be amended to reflect the most appropriate
distribution given the new environment consistent with the investment objectives.
Expected future benefit payments for the plans at the end of their respective fiscal years are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporations |
|
|
BCH |
|
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Plan |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,817 |
|
|
$ |
2,119 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
2013 |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
3,028 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
2015 through 2019 |
|
|
11,728 |
|
|
|
15,357 |
|
The fair values of the Corporations Pension Plan Assets at December 31, 2009, by asset category,
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Category |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Equity Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Large Cap |
|
$ |
13,308 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,308 |
|
US Small Cap |
|
|
8,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,597 |
|
International Large cap (a) |
|
|
5,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,950 |
|
Emerging Markets |
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
Mutual Funds (b) |
|
|
5,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,762 |
|
Mortgage Back Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
US Corporate Bonds ( c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
US Treasuries |
|
|
8,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,901 |
|
Municipal Bonds (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,333 |
|
Interest Bearing Deposits |
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets at Fair Value |
|
$ |
45,969 |
|
|
$ |
14,575 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These categories are comprised of actively managed exchange traded funds with
underlying investments in international large cap and emerging markets equity securities. |
|
(b) |
|
Approximately 27% of mutual funds invest in international bonds, 30% in US high yield
bonds, 21% in commodities, and 22% invest in real estate investments. |
|
(c) |
|
This category represents investment grade bonds of US issuers from diverse industries. |
|
(d) |
|
This category includes approximately 30% of Puerto Rico
municipal bonds and 70% in US municipal bonds. |
119
Determination of Fair Value
The following is a description of the valuation inputs and techniques used to measure the fair
value of pension plan assets.
Equity Securities and Funds
For common stocks, mutual funds, and exchange-traded funds, fair value is based on quoted market
prices for identical securities, and accordingly, are classified as Level 1.
Mortgage Backed Securities
The mortgage backed securities held in the pension plan are backed 100% by Puerto Rico mortgages.
Fair values are measured using model-based valuation techniques which incorporate observable rates
adjusted for prepayment assumptions and other factors based on the characteristics of the
underlying pool of mortgages. These inputs are observable in the market and therefore have been
classified as Level 2.
US Corporate Bonds
Generally, fair values for US corporate bonds are estimated using discounted cash flow techniques
based on observable market data. Therefore, these securities have been classified as Level 2.
However, values are based on quoted market prices of identical securities, if traded on a daily
basis.
US Government and Municipal Bonds
US Government and municipal bonds securities held in the pension plans consist mainly of US
Treasury notes, US municipal Bonds, and Puerto Rico municipal bonds. The fair value of US Treasury
notes is generally based on actual quoted market prices for identical securities traded in active
markets and therefore has been classified as Level 1. US and Puerto Rico municipal bonds are valued
using observable market inputs and therefore have been classified as Level 2.
Interest Bearing Deposits
Interest Bearing Deposits consist of money market accounts with short term maturities and therefore
the carrying value approximates fair value.
Savings Plans
The Corporation also provides three contributory savings plans pursuant to Section 1165(e) of the
Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code for substantially all the employees of the Corporation.
Investments in the plans are participant-directed, and employer matching contributions are
determined based on the specific provisions of each plan. Employees are fully vested in the
employers contribution after three and five years of service, respectively. The Corporations
contributions for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, amounted to $188,000,
$1,110,000 and $1,476,000, respectively. Effective March 2009, the Corporation amended the plans to
suspend monthly contributions.
20. Long Term Incentive Plans:
Santander Group sponsors various non-qualified share-based compensation programs for certain of its
employees and those of its subsidiaries, including the Corporation. All of these plans have been
approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. A summary of each of the plans follows:
|
|
|
A long term incentive plan for certain eligible officers and key employees which
contains service, performance and market conditions. This plan provides for settlement in
cash or stock of Santander Group to the participants and is classified as a liability
plan. Accordingly, the Corporation accrued a liability and recognized monthly
compensation expense over the fourteen month vesting period through January 2008. The
Corporation recognized a reversal of compensation expense under this plan amounting to
$4.1 million due to a favorable change in plan valuation during the year ended December
31, 2008 and $10.3 million of compensation expense for the same period in 2007. As options
were exercised during 2008, $6.7 million was reclassified from liabilities to capital paid
in excess of par value, as a capital contribution.
|
120
|
|
|
The grant of 100 shares of Santander Spain stock to all employees of Santander Groups
operating entities as part of the celebration of Santander Group 150th Anniversary during
2007. The Corporation recognized compensation
expense under this plan amounting to $4.3 million in 2007. The shares granted were purchased
by an affiliate and recorded as a capital contribution in the Corporations 2007
consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity. |
|
|
|
|
A long term incentive plan for certain eligible officers and key employees which
contains service, performance and market conditions. This plan comprehends two cycles,
one expired in 2009 and another expiring in 2010. This plan provides for settlement in
stock of Santander Group to the participants and is classified as an equity plan.
Accordingly, the Corporation recognizes monthly compensation expense over the two and
three year cycles and credits additional paid in capital. The Corporation recognized
compensation expense under this plan amounting to $2.0 million and 2.9 million and $0.2
million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
A long term incentive plan for certain eligible officers and key employees which
contains service, performance and market conditions. This plan comprehends one cycle
expiring in 2011. This plan provides for settlement in stock of Santander Group to the
participants and is classified as an equity plan. Accordingly, the Corporation recognizes
monthly compensation expense and credits additional paid in capital. The Corporation
recognized compensation expense under this plan amounting to $0.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009. |
21. Related Party Transactions:
The Corporation engages in transactions with affiliated companies in the ordinary course of
business. At December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then ended, the Corporation had the
following balances and/or transactions with related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Deposits from related parties |
|
$ |
789,845 |
|
|
$ |
695,948 |
|
|
$ |
17,344 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits with affiliates |
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
Other borrowings from an affiliate |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loans to directors, officers, and related parties
(on substantially the same terms and credit risks
as loans to third parties) |
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
3,288 |
|
Technical assistance income for services rendered |
|
|
4,016 |
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
2,769 |
|
Operating expenses for EDP services received |
|
|
18,349 |
|
|
|
17,288 |
|
|
|
13,461 |
|
Technical assistance expense for software development |
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
Rental income |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
Fair value of derivative financial instruments
purchased from affiliates |
|
|
(102,129 |
) |
|
|
(158,552 |
) |
|
|
(26,917 |
) |
Fair value of derivative financial instruments
sold to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
354 |
|
Loans sold to an affiliate |
|
|
142,017 |
|
|
|
300,097 |
|
|
|
10,465 |
|
121
22. Derivative Financial Instruments:
The Corporations principal objective in holding interest rate swap agreements is the management of
interest rate risk and changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities. The following
summarizes the derivatives used by the Corporation in managing interest rate and fair values
exposures:
Interest Rate Swaps. An interest rate swap is an agreement between two entities to exchange cash
flows in the future. The agreement sets the dates on which the cash flows will be paid and the
manner in which the cash flows will be calculated. It involves the promise by one party to pay cash
flows equivalent to the interest on a notional principal amount at a predetermined fixed rate for a
given period of time. In return for this promise, this party receives cash flows equivalent to the
interest on the same notional principal amount at a variable rate index for the same period of
time. The variable interest rate received by the Corporation is London Interbank Offered Rate
(LIBOR).
Interest Rate Caps and Floors. In a cap agreement, a cash flow is generated if the price or rate of
an underlying variable rises above a certain threshold (or cap) price. In a floor agreement, a
cash flow is generated if the price or rate of an underlying variable falls below a certain
threshold (or floor) price.
Indexed Options. Options are generally over-the-counter (OTC) contracts that the Corporation enters
into in an order to receive the appreciation of a specified Stock Index (e.g. Dow Jones Industrial
Composite Stock Index, S&P 500, Nikkei, and Dow Jones Euro Stock) over a specified period in
exchange for a premium paid at the contracts inception. The option period is determined by the
contractual maturity of the certificates of deposits tied to the performance of the Index.
Loan Commitment. Commitment to a borrower by a lending institution that it will loan a specific
amount at a certain rate on a particular piece of real estate.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had the following derivative financial instruments
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) for |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the year ended |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
ECONOMIC UNDESIGNATED HEDGES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
(492 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,702 |
) |
OTHER DERIVATIVES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
105,450 |
|
|
|
3,789 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Embedded options on stock-indexed deposits |
|
|
105,450 |
|
|
|
(3,789 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Interest rate caps |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Customer interest rate caps |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Customer interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,655,318 |
|
|
|
112,031 |
|
|
|
(64,416 |
) |
Interest rate swaps-offsetting position of customer swaps |
|
|
1,675,319 |
|
|
|
(111,811 |
) |
|
|
64,810 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
Loan commitments |
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5,696 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had the following derivative financial instruments
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) for |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the year |
|
|
Gain* for the |
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended |
|
|
year ended |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2008 |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOW HEDGES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
ECONOMIC UNDESIGNATED HEDGES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
5,210 |
|
|
|
4,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DERIVATIVES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
118,214 |
|
|
|
3,774 |
|
|
|
(18,995 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Embedded options on stock-indexed deposits |
|
|
118,214 |
|
|
|
(3,774 |
) |
|
|
18,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Customer interest rate caps |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Customer interest rate swaps |
|
|
1,729,209 |
|
|
|
176,447 |
|
|
|
130,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps-offsetting position of customer swaps |
|
|
1,729,209 |
|
|
|
(176,787 |
) |
|
|
(131,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments |
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,946 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the adoption of FASB ASC Topic 825, changes in the value of the derivatives instruments
qualifying as fair value hedges that have been highly effective were recognized in the current
period results of operations along with the change in the value of the designated hedged item. If
the hedge relationship was terminated, hedge accounting was discontinued and any balance related to
the derivative was recognized in current operations, and fair value adjustment to the hedge item
continued to be reported as part of the basis of the item and was amortized to earnings as a yield
adjustment. After adoption of FASB ASC Topic 825 for certain callable brokered certificates of
deposit and subordinated capital notes, the hedge relationship was terminated, and both previously
hedged items and the respective hedging derivatives are presented at fair value with changes
recorded in the current period results of operations.
The Corporation hedges certain callable brokered certificates of deposit and subordinated capital
notes by using interest rate swaps. Prior to the adoption of FASB ASC Topic 825 as of January 1,
2008, these swaps were designated for hedge accounting treatment under FASB ASC Topic 815. For
designated fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of both the hedging instrument and the
underlying hedged instrument were included in other income and the interest flows were included in
the net interest income in the consolidated statements of operations. In connection with the
adoption of FASB ASC Topic 825, the Corporation elected the fair value option for certain callable
brokered certificates of deposit and subordinated capital notes and is no longer required to
maintain hedge accounting documentation to achieve a similar financial statements outcome.
As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had outstanding interest rate swap agreements with a
notional amount of approximately $125 million, maturing through the year 2032. The weighted
average rate paid and received on these contracts is 0.68% and 6.22%, respectively. As of December
31, 2009, the Corporation had two subordinated notes aggregating approximately $125 million, with a
fair value of $120.6 million, swapped to create a floating rate source of funds. For the year ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation recognized a loss of approximately $5.7 million, a
gain of $4.3 million and a loss of $465,000, respectively, on these economic hedges, which is included in other income in
the consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had outstanding interest rate swap agreements with a
notional amount of approximately $125 million, maturing through the year 2032. The weighted
average rate paid and received on these contracts is 3.24% and 6.22%, respectively. As of December
31, 2008, the Corporation had two subordinated notes aggregating to approximately $125 million,
with a fair value of $118.3 million, swapped to create a floating rate source of funds. As a result
of the bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. (LBHI) and the default on its
contractual payments as of September 19, 2008, the Corporation terminated $23.8 million of
fixed-for-floating interest rate swaps. The derivative liability of the
123
swaps with Lehman Brothers Special Financing (LBSF) was $681,535 as of September 19, 2008 and was
paid on December 5, 2008.
The Corporation issues certificates of deposit, individual retirement accounts and notes with
returns linked to the different equity indexes, which constitute embedded derivative instruments
that are bifurcated from the host deposit and recognized on the consolidated balance sheets. The
Corporation enters into option agreements in order to manage the interest rate risk on these
deposits and notes; however, these options have not been designated for hedge accounting, therefore
gains and losses on the market value of both the embedded derivative instruments and the option
contracts are marked to market through results of operations and recorded in other income in the
consolidated statements of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2009, a loss of
approximately $16,000 was recorded on embedded options on stock-indexed deposits and notes and a
gain of approximately $16,000 was recorded on the option contracts. For the year ended December 31,
2008, a gain of approximately $19.0 million was recorded on embedded options on stock-indexed
deposits and notes and a loss of approximately $19.0 million was recorded on the option contracts.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, a loss of approximately $0.1
million was recorded on embedded options on stock-index deposits and
notes and a gain of approximately $0.1 million was recorded on the
option contracts.
The Corporation enters into certain derivative transactions to provide derivative products to
customers, which includes interest rate caps, collars and swaps, and simultaneously covers the
Corporations position with related and unrelated third parties under substantially the same terms
and conditions. These derivatives are not linked to specific assets and liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets or to forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge relationship and,
therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. These derivatives are carried at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as part of other income. For the year
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation
recognized a net gain of $394,000 and a net
loss of $1,213,000 and $364,000 on these transactions, respectively.
To a lesser extent, the Corporation enters into freestanding derivative contracts as a proprietary
position taker, based on market expectations or on benefits from price differentials between
financial instruments and markets. These derivatives are not linked to specific assets and
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets or to forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge
relationship and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. For the year ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007, the Corporation recognized a net loss of
$287,000 and a net gain of $821,000 and $315,000,
respectively, on these transactions. There were no outstanding freestanding derivatives contracts
as of December 31, 2009.
The Corporation enters into loan commitments with customers to extend mortgage loans at a specified
rate. These loan commitments are written options and are measured at fair value pursuant to FASB
ASC Topic 820 and FASB ASC Topic 815. As of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Corporation had loan commitments outstanding for approximately $3.4 million and $3.9 million,
respectively. The Corporation recognized a net loss of $101,000 for the year ended December 31,
2009 and a net gain of $48,000 and $35,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, on these commitments.
The Corporation is exposed to certain risk relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary
risk managed by using derivative instruments is the interest rate risk. The following table
presents the fair value of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet:
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC Topic 815: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
114,991 |
|
|
$ |
193,312 |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
Other assets |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Options |
|
Other assets |
|
|
3,789 |
|
|
|
3,774 |
|
Loan commitment |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
118,788 |
|
|
$ |
197,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
Location |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC Topic 815: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Other liabilities |
|
$ |
115,263 |
|
|
$ |
187,525 |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Options |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
3,789 |
|
|
|
3,774 |
|
Loan commitment |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
119,068 |
|
|
$ |
191,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the effect of the derivative instruments on the consolidated
statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) recognized int |
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
Income on derivatives |
|
|
|
recognized in Income on |
|
|
for the year ended |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC Topic 815: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Interest Income (Expense) |
|
$ |
6,020 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
(5,141 |
) |
Loan commitment |
|
Other Income (Loss) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Features
Certain of the Corporations derivative instruments contain provisions that require the
Corporations debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit
rating agencies. If the Corporations debt were to fall below investment grade, it would be a
violation of these provisions and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could demand
immediate payment or immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on derivative
instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with
credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position on December 31, 2009 and
2008 was $4.1 million and $15.5 million, respectively, for which the Corporation has posted
collateral of $2.2 million and $9.2 million, respectively, in the normal course of business.
125
23. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk:
In the normal course of business, the Corporation is a party to transactions of financial
instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These
financial instruments may include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit,
financial guarantees and interest rate caps, swaps and floors written. Those instruments involve,
to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized on
the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the
extent of involvement the Corporation has in the different classes of financial instruments.
FASB ASC Topic 460, Guarantees, establishes accounting and disclosure requirements for
guarantees, requiring that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability in
an amount equal to the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. FASB ASC
Topic 460 defines a guarantee as a contract that contingently requires the guarantor to pay a
guaranteed party, based upon: (a) changes in an underlying asset, liability or equity security of
the guaranteed party; or (b) a third partys failure to perform under a specified agreement. The
Corporation considers the following off-balance sheet lending-related arrangements to be guarantees
under FASB ASC Topic 460: standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit.
The fair value at inception of the obligation undertaken when issuing the guarantees and
commitments that qualify under FASB ASC Topic 460 approximates the unamortized fees received from
the customers. The fair value of the liability recorded at inception is amortized into income as
lending & deposit-related fees over the life of the guarantee contract.
The Corporations exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to
the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and
financial guarantees written, is represented by the contractual notional amounts of those
instruments.
The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as
it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Standby letters of credit and other commitments to extend
credit are subject to the Corporations internal risk rating systems. The contract amount of
financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, whose amounts represent credit risk as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written |
|
$ |
41,837 |
|
|
$ |
95,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
to extend credit, approved loans not yet disbursed and unused lines of credit |
|
$ |
1,218,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,193,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation issues financial standby letters of credit to guarantee the performance of its
customers to third parties. If the customer fails to meet its financial performance obligation to
the third party, then the Corporation would be obligated to make the payment to the guaranteed
party. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporations liabilities include $254,000 and
$1,102,000, respectively, which represents the fair value of the obligations undertaken in issuing
the guarantees under the standby letters of credit issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The
fair value approximates the unamortized fees received from the customers for issuing the standby
letters of credit. The fees are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the
commitment period. Standby letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2009 had terms ranging
from one month to four years. The contract amounts of the standby letters of credit of
approximately $41,837,000 and $95,660,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, represent
the maximum potential amount of future payments the Corporation could be required to make under the
guarantees in the event of non-performance by all its customers. These standby letters of credit
typically expire without being drawn upon. Management does not anticipate any material losses
related to these guarantees.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are
expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Corporation evaluates each customers credit worthiness on
a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation
upon extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparty.
Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory,
126
property, plant and
equipment, income-producing commercial properties and real estate. The Corporation holds
collateral as guarantee for most of these financial instruments. The Corporations commitment to extend credit,
approved loans not yet disbursed and unused lines of credit amounted to approximately $1.2 billion
at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and had a fair value of $1.2 million, as of both dates.
24. Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted FASB ASC Topic 820, which provides a framework
for measuring fair value.
The Corporation also adopted FASB ASC Topic 825 on January 1, 2008. FASB ASC Topic 825 allows an
entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for
certain financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis. The Corporation elected
to adopt the fair value option for callable brokered certificates of deposits and subordinated
notes on the adoption date. FASB ASC Topic 825 requires that the difference between the carrying
value before election of the fair value option and the fair value of these instruments be recorded
as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption.
The following table summarizes the impact of adopting the fair value option for certain financial
instruments on January 1, 2008. Amounts shown represent the carrying value of the affected
instruments before and after the changes in accounting resulting from the adoption FASB ASC Topic
825.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance as of |
|
|
|
|
|
Opening Balance as of |
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Adoption Net |
|
|
January 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Prior to Adoption)* |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
(After Adoption) |
|
Impact of Electing the Fair Value Option under Topic 825: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposits |
|
$ |
(763,476 |
) |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
(763,412 |
) |
Subordinated Capital Notes |
|
|
(123,686 |
) |
|
|
5,134 |
|
|
|
(118,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative-effect Adjustments (pre-tax) |
|
$ |
(887,162 |
) |
|
|
5,198 |
|
|
$ |
(881,964 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Impact |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative-effect Adjustment Increase to Retained
Earmings, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Net of debt issue cost, placement fees and basis adjustments as of December 31, 2007 |
Fair Value Hierarchy
FASB ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC
Topic 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of
observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The
standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and
equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an
active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. treasury, other
U.S. government, agency mortgage-backed debt securities and FDIC
insured corporate bonds that are highly liquid and are actively
traded in over-the-counter markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that
are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full
term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities
include securities with quoted prices that are traded less
frequently than exchange-traded instruments, securities and
derivative contracts and financial liabilities whose value is
determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable
in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated
by observable market data. This category generally includes
certain mortgage-backed debt securities, corporate debt
securities, derivatives |
127
|
|
|
|
|
contracts, callable brokered certificates
of deposits, subordinated notes and Puerto Rico open-ended funds. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets
or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial
instruments whose value is determined using pricing models,
discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well
as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires
significant management judgment or estimation. This category
generally includes certain Puerto Rico corporate debt securities,
Puerto Rico closed-ended funds, and certain derivative contracts. |
Recurring Measurements
The following table presents for each of these hierarchy levels, the Corporations assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial instruments
for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option at December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Securities |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
39,376 |
|
|
$ |
8,263 |
|
|
$ |
47,739 |
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale |
|
|
323,638 |
|
|
|
93,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
417,608 |
|
Derivative Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,541 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
118,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets reported at Fair Value |
|
$ |
323,738 |
|
|
$ |
251,887 |
|
|
$ |
8,510 |
|
|
$ |
584,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,476 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,476 |
|
Subordinated Capital Notes (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,551 |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,813 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
119,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities reported at Fair Value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
251,840 |
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
252,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Securities |
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
35,083 |
|
|
$ |
29,519 |
|
|
$ |
64,719 |
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale |
|
|
171,916 |
|
|
|
630,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
802,112 |
|
Derivative Assets |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
195,993 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
197,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets reported at Fair Value |
|
$ |
172,496 |
|
|
$ |
861,272 |
|
|
$ |
30,255 |
|
|
$ |
1,064,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
101,401 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
101,401 |
|
Subordinated Capital Notes (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,282 |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,669 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
191,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities reported at Fair Value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
410,352 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
410,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts represent certain callable brokered certificates of deposits for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option |
|
|
|
under FASB ASC Topic 825. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts represent certain subordinated capital notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option under FASB ASC Topic 825. |
Level 3 assets and liabilities were 1.5% and 0.10% of total assets reported at fair value and
total liabilities carried at fair value, respectively, as of December 31, 2009 and 2.8% and 0.16%
as of December 31, 2008, respectively.
The following table presents the reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the period from
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009 and January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008:
128
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loss included in |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
issuances |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
losses |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
out of |
|
|
and |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
still |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
held (2) |
|
Trading Securities (1) |
|
$ |
29,519 |
|
|
$ |
(1,824 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(19,432 |
) |
|
$ |
8,263 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Derivatives, net |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,612 |
|
|
$ |
(1,925 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(19,432 |
) |
|
$ |
8,255 |
|
|
$ |
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized/unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains included in |
|
|
Transfers |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
in and/or |
|
|
issuances |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
gains (loss) |
|
|
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
out of |
|
|
and |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
still |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
settlements |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
held (2) |
|
Trading Securities (1) |
|
$ |
20,150 |
|
|
$ |
1,888 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,481 |
|
|
$ |
29,519 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
Derivatives, net |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,481 |
|
|
$ |
29,612 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Changes in fair value and gains and losses from sales for these instruments are recorded in other income while interest revenue and expense are included in
the net interest income based on the contractual coupons on the consolidated statements of income. The amounts above do not include interest. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earmings, attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses)
relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at December 31, 2009 and 2008. |
The table below summarizes gains and losses due to changes in fair value, including both
realized and unrealized gains and losses, recorded in earnings for Level 3 assets and liabilities
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. These amounts include gains and losses generated by
derivative contracts and trading securities, which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption
of FASB ASC Topic 825.
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains (Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Classification of gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
included in earnings for the period : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
1,888 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains or losses recorded in earnings for the
years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are still held at
December 31, 2009 and 2008. These amounts include changes in fair value for derivative contracts
and trading securities, which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of Topic 825.
129
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Unrealized Gains (Loss) |
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Classification of unrealized gains (losses)
included in earnings for the period : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
(101 |
) |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of Fair Value
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments recorded at fair
value and for estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded, but disclosed at fair
value. The estimated fair value was calculated using certain facts and assumptions, which vary
depending on the specific financial instrument.
Short-Term Financial Instruments
Short-term financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, interest-bearing deposits
placed, federal funds purchased and other borrowings, commercial paper issued, accrued interest
receivable and payable, certain other assets and liabilities, are carried at historical cost. The
carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value of these instruments. These financial
instruments generally expose the Corporation to limited credit risk and have no stated maturities
or have short-term maturities and carry interest rates that approximate market.
Trading Securities
Trading securities are recorded at fair value and consist primarily of mortgage-backed securities,
Puerto Rico government obligations, corporate debt, and equity securities. Fair value is generally
based on quoted market prices. Level 1 securities owned include those identical securities traded
in active markets. Level 2 trading securities owned include those securities for which market prices are
not available and fair values are estimated based on dealer quotes, pricing models, discounted cash
flow methodologies, or similar techniques for which the determination of fair value may require
significant management judgment or estimation. Level 2 trading securities primarily include Puerto
Rico government obligations and Puerto Rico open-ended funds Level 3 trading securities primarily
include Puerto Rico corporate debt securities and Puerto Rico
fixed-income closed-ended funds. At
December 31, 2009, the majority of these instruments were valued based on dealer indicative quotes
and recent trade activity.
The Corporation holds certain equity securities for which the net asset value is used for valuation
purposes. The equity securities held by the Corporation have limited observable activity, therefore
are classified within level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The table
below summarizes those securities owned open-ended and closed-ended funds outstanding as of
December 31, 2009 for which the Corporation uses the net asset value for valuation purposes.
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Redemption |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Frequency |
Closed-ended funds (1) |
|
$ |
7,037,646 |
|
|
N/A |
Open-ended fixed income funds (2) |
|
|
1,644,909 |
|
|
Daily, Weekly |
Open-ended equity funds (3) |
|
|
1,541,742 |
|
|
Daily |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,224,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These funds seek to provide shareholders with a high level of current income
consistent with the preservation of capital, its investment policies and prudent
investment management. These funds will invest not less than 67% of its assets in Puerto
Rico securities and up to 33% in U.S. securities. The fair value of the funds
investments, |
130
|
|
|
|
|
which include municipal securities bonds issued by Puerto Rico and United
States governments and agencies, mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds and
preferred stock, are obtained from third-party pricing services providers and by
broker-dealers. Market inputs utilized in the pricing evaluatiohin process include,
primarily, all or some of the following: benchmark yields, reported trades,
broker-dealers quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, bid-offer price or spread,
benchmark securities, bids, offers, reference data, benchmark curves including but not
limited to Treasury benchmarks, LIBOR and swap curves, and industry and economic events.
Certain securities of the Fund for which quotations are not readily available from any
source, are valued at fair value by or under the direction of the Investment Adviser
utilizing quotations and other information concerning similar securities obtained from
recognized dealers. Short-term securities having a maturity of 60 days or less are
valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. All Puerto Rico fixed income
securities valuations provided by broker-dealers are priced using the average of two
quotes, if available. |
|
(2) |
|
These funds seek to provide shareholders with a high level of current income
consistent with the preservation of capital, its investment policies and prudent
investment management. There are two funds under this category, one hold not less than
67% of its assets in Puerto Rico securities and up to 33% in U.S. securities, and the
other hold not less than 20% of its assets in Puerto Rico securities and up to 80% in
non-Puerto Rico securities. The fair value of the funds investments, which include
municipal securities bonds issued by Puerto Rico and United States governments and
agencies, mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds and preferred stock, are obtained
from third-party pricing services providers and by broker-dealers. Market inputs
utilized in the pricing evaluation process include, primarily, all or some of the
following: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealers quotes, issuer spreads,
two-sided markets, bid-offer price or spread, benchmark securities, bids, offers,
reference data, benchmark curves including but not limited to Treasury benchmarks, LIBOR
and swap curves, and industry and economic events. Certain securities of the Fund for
which quotations are not readily available from any source, are valued at fair value by
or under the direction of the Investment Adviser utilizing quotations and other
information concerning similar securities obtained from recognized dealers. Short-term
securities having a maturity of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which
approximates fair value. All Puerto Rico fixed income securities valuations provided by
broker-dealers are priced using the average of two quotes, if available. |
|
(3) |
|
These funds seek to provide shareholders long-term growth of capital. These funds
will invest up to 80% of its assets in common stock and other equity securities of U.S.
and foreign companies with small, medium and large market capitalization, including
exchanged-traded funds. One of the funds can also invest in alternative investments.
Each fund will invest at least 20% of its assets in Puerto Rico securities. The fair
value of the securities is determined on the basis of the valuations provided by dealers
or independent pricing services. Equity securities are valued at the official closing
price of, or the last reported sales price on, the exchange or market on which such
securities are traded, as of the close of business on the day the securities are being
valued, or lacking any sales, at the last available bid price. Certain securities of the
Fund for which quotations are not readily available from any source, are valued at fair
value by or under the direction of the Investment Adviser utilizing quotations and other
information concerning similar securities obtained from recognized dealers. Short-term
securities having a maturity of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which
approximates fair value. All Puerto Rico fixed income securities valuations provided by
broker-dealers are priced using the average of two quotes, if available. |
Investment Securities Available for Sale
Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair
value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available,
fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques
such as discounted cash flow methodologies, adjusted for the securitys credit rating, prepayment
assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 Investment securities
available for sale include those identical securities traded in active markets, such as U.S.
treasury and agency securities. Level 2 securities primarily include Puerto Rico Government
securities and mortgage-backed securities.
Other Investment Securities
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stocks are recorded under the cost method of accounting. There are
restrictions on the sale of FHLB stocks, however they are redeemable at par. The carrying amount is
a reasonable estimate of fair value.
131
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market. Fair values for loans held for sale
are based on observable inputs, such as observable market prices, credit spreads and interest rate
yield curves when available. In instances when significant valuation assumptions are not readily
observable in the market, instruments are valued based on the best available data in order to
approximate fair value. This data may be internally developed and considers types of loans,
conformity of loans, delinquency statistics and risk premiums that a market participant would
require, and accordingly may be classified as Level 3 in a non-recurring fair value measurement.
Loans
Loans are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. As such, valuation techniques discussed
herein for loans are primarily for estimating fair value for disclosure purposes. However, any
allowance for collateral dependent loans deemed impaired is measured based on the fair value of the
underlying collateral and its estimated disposition costs. The fair value of collateral is
determined by external valuation specialists, and accordingly classified as Level 3 inputs for
impaired loans in a non-recurring fair value measurement disclosure.
The fair value for disclosure purposes are estimated for portfolios of loans held to maturity with
similar financial characteristics, such as loan category, pricing features and remaining maturity.
Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, consumer, mortgage, construction, and other loans.
Each loan category is further segmented based on similar market and credit risk characteristics.
The fair value is calculated by discounting the contractual cash flows using discount rates that
reflect the current pricing for loans with similar characteristics and remaining maturity. Fair
values consider the credit risk of the counterparties.
Derivatives
For exchange-traded contracts, fair value is based on quoted market prices, and accordingly,
classified as Level 1. For non-exchange traded contracts, fair value is based on internally
developed proprietary models or discounted cash flow methodology using various inputs. The inputs
include those characteristics of the derivative that have a bearing on the economics of the
instrument.
The determination of the fair value of many derivatives is mainly derived from inputs that are
observable in the market place. Such inputs include yield curves, publicly available volatilities,
floating indexes, foreign exchange prices, and accordingly, are classified as Level 2 inputs.
Level 3 derivatives include interest rate lock commitments (IRLC), the fair value for which is
derived from the fair value of related mortgage loans primarily based on observable inputs. In
estimating the fair value of an IRLC, the Corporation assigns a probability to the loan commitment
based on an expectation that it will be exercised and the loan will be funded. In addition, certain
OTC equity linked options are priced by counterparties, and accordingly are classified as Level 3
inputs.
Valuations of derivative assets and liabilities reflect the value of the instruments including the
values associated with counterparty risk., With the issuance of FASB ASC Topic 820, these values
must also take into account the Corporations own credit standing, thus including in the valuation
of the derivative instrument the value of the net credit differential between the counterparties to
the derivative contract. The Corporation does not determine a credit
value adjustment on derivative assets and
liabilities where
Santander Group and/or its affiliates are the counterparties, because it believes there is no
material exposure to counterparty credit risk. Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation updated
its methodology to include the impact of both counterparty and its own credit standing.
Deposits and Subordinated Capital Notes
Under FASB ASC Topic 825, the Corporation elected to carry callable brokered certificates of
deposits and subordinated notes at fair value. The fair value of callable brokered certificates of
deposits, included within deposits, and subordinated capital notes is determined using discounted
cash flow analyses over the full term of the instruments. The valuation uses an industry-standard
model for the instruments with callable option components. The model incorporates such observable
inputs as yield curves, publicly available volatilities and floating indexes and accordingly, is
classified as Level 2 inputs. Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation updated its methodology to
include the impact of its own credit standing.
Deposits, other than those recorded at fair value under FASB ASC Topic 825, are carried at
historical cost. For FASB ASC Topic 825 disclosures, fair value of deposits with no stated
maturity, such as demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts, money market and checking accounts is
equal to the amount payable on demand as of December 31, 2008. The fair value of fixed maturity
certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount
rate is estimated
132
using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities,
including adjustments to reflect the current credit worthiness of the Corporation.
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase and Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal Home Loan Bank advances are carried at
historical cost. For FASB ASC Topic 825 disclosures, the fair value is determined by discounting
cash flows by market rates currently offered for similar instruments.
Term Notes
Term notes are carried at historical cost. For FASB ASC Topic 825 disclosures, the fair value is
determined using discounted cash flows method, which considers an estimated discount rate currently
offered for similar borrowings, including adjustments to reflect the current credit worthiness of
the Corporation.
Standby Letters Of Credit and Commitments to Extend Credit
Standby letters of credit, financial guarantees, commitments to extend credit, and unused lines of
credit generally have stated maturities within one year and are recorded off-balance sheet. As
such, valuation techniques discussed herein are for estimating fair value for disclosure purposes.
The unamortized fees collected for theses instruments are considered a reasonable approximation of
fair value.
Non-Recurring Measurements for Assets
The following table presents the carrying value of those assets measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis, for which impairment was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2009
and 2008.
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2009 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Dec. 31, 2009 |
|
Loans, net(1) |
|
$ |
183,691 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
183,691 |
|
|
$ |
27,811 |
|
Repossesed Assets (2) |
|
|
25,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,182 |
|
|
|
7,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
208,873 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
208,873 |
|
|
$ |
34,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represented loans measured for impairment during the period based on the fair value of the collateral using the practical expedient in
FASB ASC Topic 310. |
|
(2) |
|
Amount represented real estate owned properties measured for impairment during the period based on the fair value of the collateral accordance
with the adoption of FASB ASC Topic 820. |
133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using |
|
|
|
|
Carriying |
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
Valuation |
|
|
Value |
|
Active Markets for |
|
Other |
|
Unobservable |
|
Allowance |
|
|
as of |
|
Identical Assets |
|
Observable Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
as of |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Dec. 31, 2008 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Dec. 31, 2008 |
Loans, net(1)
|
|
$ |
59,152 |
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$ |
59,152 |
|
|
$ |
18,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represented loans measured for impairment during the period based on the fair value of the collateral using the practical expedient in
FASB ASC Topic 310. |
Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposits and Subordinated Capital Notes
The Corporation elected to account at fair value certain of its callable brokered certificates of
deposits and subordinated capital notes that were hedged with interest rate swaps designated for
fair value hedge accounting in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815. As of December 31, 2009 and
2008, these callable brokered certificates of deposits had been cancelled and subordinated capital
notes had a fair value of $120.6 million and $118.3million, respectively and principal balance of
$125.0 million. Interest expense on these items is recorded in Net Interest Income whereas net
gains (losses) resulting from the changes in fair value of these items, were recorded within Other
Income on the Corporations consolidated statements of operations. Electing the fair value option
allows the Corporation to avoid the burden of complying with the requirements for hedge accounting
under FASB ASC Topic 815 (e.g., documentation and effectiveness assessment) without introducing
earnings volatility. Subsequent to the adoption of FASB ASC Topic 825, debt issuance costs are
recognized in Net Interest Income when incurred. Interest rate risk on the callable brokered
certificates of deposits and subordinated capital notes measured at fair value under FASB ASC Topic
825 continues to be economically hedged with callable interest rate swaps with the same terms and
conditions.
The following table represents changes in fair value for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
which includes the interest expense on callable brokered certificates of deposits and interest
expense on subordinated capital notes. Interest expense on callable brokered certificates of
deposits and subordinated capitals notes that the Corporation has elected to carry at fair value
under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 825 are recorded in interest expense in the consolidated
statements of operations based on their contractual coupons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
Total Changes in |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
included in |
|
|
included in |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
Other Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposits |
|
$ |
(1,959 |
) |
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
$ |
(1,297 |
) |
Subordinated Capital Notes |
|
|
(7,775 |
) |
|
|
(2,269 |
) |
|
|
(10,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(9,734 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,607 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
Changes in |
|
|
Total Changes in |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
included in |
|
|
included in |
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
Other Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposits |
|
$ |
(18,245 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,159 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,404 |
) |
Subordinated Capital Notes |
|
|
(7,775 |
) |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
(7,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(26,020 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,889 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of changes in the Corporations credit risk on subordinated capital notes for the
year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 presented in the table below has been calculated as the
difference between the fair value of those instruments as of the reporting date and the theoretical
fair values of those instruments calculated by using the yield curve prevailing at the end of the
reporting period, adjusted up or down for changes in credit spreads from the transition date to the
reporting date.
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
related |
|
|
not related |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
related |
|
|
not related |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
|
Credit Risk |
|
|
Credit Risk |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Credit Risk |
|
|
Credit Risk |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
Subordinated Capital Notes |
|
$ |
(8,223 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,821 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,044 |
) |
|
$ |
6,667 |
|
|
$ |
(14,172 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FASB ASC Topic 825 Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The table below is a summary of fair value estimates as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, for
financial instruments, as defined by FASB ASC Topic 825, excluding short-term financial assets and
liabilities, for which carrying amounts approximate fair value, and excluding financial instruments
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value estimates are made at a discrete point
in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instruments.
Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Corporations financial instruments, fair
value estimates are based on judgments regarding risk characteristics of various financial
instruments, current economic conditions, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in
nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be
determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. In
addition, the fair value estimates are based on
existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value
of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered
financial instruments.
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated balance sheets financial
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investment securities |
|
$ |
55,431 |
|
|
$ |
55,431 |
|
|
$ |
61,632 |
|
|
$ |
61,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale |
|
$ |
26,726 |
|
|
$ |
26,643 |
|
|
$ |
38,459 |
|
|
$ |
38,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1) |
|
$ |
5,034,942 |
|
|
$ |
4,725,493 |
|
|
$ |
5,929,499 |
|
|
$ |
5,862,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits interest-bearing |
|
$ |
3,696,791 |
|
|
$ |
3,698,246 |
|
|
$ |
4,321,939 |
|
|
$ |
4,311,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
$ |
365,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances |
|
$ |
1,060,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,070,542 |
|
|
$ |
1,185,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,159,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated capital note (2) |
|
$ |
189,000 |
|
|
$ |
197,979 |
|
|
$ |
189,000 |
|
|
$ |
203,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term notes |
|
$ |
20,581 |
|
|
$ |
21,030 |
|
|
$ |
19,967 |
|
|
$ |
22,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Contract or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Off balance sheet financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit and financial
guarantees written |
|
$ |
41,837 |
|
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
95,660 |
|
|
$ |
(1,102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit, approved loans
not yet disbursed and unused lines of credit |
|
$ |
1,218,115 |
|
|
$ |
(1,218 |
) |
|
$ |
1,193,875 |
|
|
$ |
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount does not include loans measured for impairment during the period based on the fair value of the collateral using the
practical expedient in FASB ASC Topic 310. |
|
(2) |
|
This amount does not include subordinated capital notes of $120.6 million and $118.3 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, measured at fair value under FSAB ASC Topic 825. |
25. Significant Group Concentrations of Credit Risk:
Most of the Corporations business activities are with customers located within Puerto Rico. The
Corporation has a diversified loan portfolio with no significant concentration in any economic
sector.
136
26. Regulatory Matters:
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by
the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain
mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could
have a direct material effect on the Corporations consolidated financial statements. Under
capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Corporation and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. The Corporations and the Banks capital classification is also subject to
qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation
and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios, as indicated below, of Total and Tier I
capital (as defined) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to
average assets (as defined). In managements opinion, the Corporation and the Bank met all capital
adequacy requirements to which they were subject as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporations required and actual regulatory capital amounts and
ratios are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
$ |
393,865 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
765,629 |
|
|
|
15.55 |
% |
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
$ |
196,932 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
521,842 |
|
|
|
10.60 |
% |
Leverage Ratio |
|
$ |
196,075 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
521,842 |
|
|
|
7.98 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
$ |
453,114 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
726,863 |
|
|
|
12.83 |
% |
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
$ |
226,557 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
476,268 |
|
|
|
8.41 |
% |
Leverage Ratio |
|
$ |
234,278 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
476,268 |
|
|
|
6.10 |
% |
As of December 31, 2009, the Bank qualified as a well-capitalized institution under the regulatory
framework. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain minimum total
risk-based, Tier I risk based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. At
December 31, 2009, there are no conditions or events that management believes to have changed the
Banks category since the regulators last examination.
137
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Banks required and actual regulatory capital amounts and
ratios follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Well-Capitalized |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
$ |
352,244 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
686,964 |
|
|
|
15.60 |
% |
|
|
≥ 10% |
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
$ |
176,122 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
571,380 |
|
|
|
12.98 |
% |
|
|
≥ 6% |
|
Leverage Ratio |
|
$ |
195,403 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
571,380 |
|
|
|
8.77 |
% |
|
|
≥ 5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Well-Capitalized |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
$ |
411,725 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
662,161 |
|
|
|
12.87 |
% |
|
|
≥ 10% |
|
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
|
$ |
205,863 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
537,395 |
|
|
|
10.44 |
% |
|
|
≥ 6% |
|
Leverage Ratio |
|
$ |
234,488 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
$ |
537,395 |
|
|
|
6.88 |
% |
|
|
≥ 5% |
|
27. Segment Information:
Types of Products and Services
The Corporation has five reportable segments: Commercial Banking, Mortgage Banking, Consumer
Finance, Treasury and Investments and Wealth Management. Insurance operations and International
Banking are other lines of business in which the Corporation commenced its involvement during 2000
and 2001, respectively, and are included in the Other column below since they did not meet the
quantitative thresholds for disclosure of segment information.
Measurement of Segment Profit or Loss and Segment Assets
The Corporations reportable business segments are strategic business units that offer distinctive
products and services that are marketed through different channels. These are managed separately
because of their unique technology, marketing and distribution requirements.
The following present financial information of reportable segments as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. General corporate expenses and income taxes have not been added
or deducted in the determination of operating segment profits. The Other column includes
insurance and international banking operations and the items necessary to reconcile the identified
segments to the reported consolidated amounts. Included in the Other column are expenses of the
internal audit, investors relations, strategic planning, administrative services, mail, marketing,
public relations, electronic data processing departments and comptrollers departments. The
Eliminations column includes all intercompany eliminations for consolidation purposes.
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Finance |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total external revenue |
|
$ |
215,301 |
|
|
$ |
159,323 |
|
|
$ |
138,794 |
|
|
$ |
23,259 |
|
|
$ |
64,333 |
|
|
$ |
53,355 |
|
|
$ |
(49,761 |
) |
|
$ |
604,604 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
46,977 |
|
|
|
(49,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
174,868 |
|
|
|
151,728 |
|
|
|
135,588 |
|
|
|
17,505 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
42,377 |
|
|
|
(42,596 |
) |
|
|
482,158 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
16,657 |
|
|
|
49,293 |
|
|
|
26,180 |
|
|
|
32,900 |
|
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
39,247 |
|
|
|
(34,772 |
) |
|
|
130,431 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
4,452 |
|
|
|
2,669 |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,451 |
|
Segment income (loss)
before income tax |
|
|
27,681 |
|
|
|
82,566 |
|
|
|
15,892 |
|
|
|
(19,662 |
) |
|
|
21,782 |
|
|
|
(65,135 |
) |
|
|
(10,514 |
) |
|
|
52,610 |
|
Segment assets |
|
|
2,541,267 |
|
|
|
2,446,855 |
|
|
|
681,855 |
|
|
|
595,807 |
|
|
|
133,882 |
|
|
|
1,379,671 |
|
|
|
(1,012,901 |
) |
|
|
6,766,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Finance |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total external revenue |
|
$ |
308,646 |
|
|
$ |
166,480 |
|
|
$ |
142,986 |
|
|
$ |
53,627 |
|
|
$ |
73,145 |
|
|
$ |
49,416 |
|
|
$ |
(45,694 |
) |
|
$ |
748,606 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
17,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
27,817 |
|
|
|
(45,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
257,835 |
|
|
|
165,729 |
|
|
|
142,428 |
|
|
|
50,930 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
22,002 |
|
|
|
(41,094 |
) |
|
|
600,771 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
64,700 |
|
|
|
73,179 |
|
|
|
27,160 |
|
|
|
89,669 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
20,875 |
|
|
|
(33,383 |
) |
|
|
244,449 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
4,367 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
2,988 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,096 |
|
Segment income (loss)
before income tax |
|
|
29,911 |
|
|
|
79,906 |
|
|
|
6,262 |
|
|
|
(69,225 |
) |
|
|
22,027 |
|
|
|
(57,163 |
) |
|
|
(7,711 |
) |
|
|
4,007 |
|
Segment assets |
|
|
3,641,521 |
|
|
|
2,679,466 |
|
|
|
659,054 |
|
|
|
1,210,654 |
|
|
|
149,149 |
|
|
|
631,091 |
|
|
|
(1,073,359 |
) |
|
|
7,897,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Mortgage |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Treasury and |
|
|
Wealth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Finance |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Total external revenue |
|
$ |
351,120 |
|
|
$ |
190,889 |
|
|
$ |
144,027 |
|
|
$ |
75,821 |
|
|
$ |
64,378 |
|
|
$ |
46,671 |
|
|
$ |
(50,576 |
) |
|
$ |
822,330 |
|
Intersegment revenue |
|
|
9,458 |
|
|
|
13,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
25,473 |
|
|
|
(50,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
299,105 |
|
|
|
168,238 |
|
|
|
140,881 |
|
|
|
71,418 |
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
24,607 |
|
|
|
(32,706 |
) |
|
|
674,210 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
99,409 |
|
|
|
102,038 |
|
|
|
36,898 |
|
|
|
116,669 |
|
|
|
3,613 |
|
|
|
30,081 |
|
|
|
(26,177 |
) |
|
|
362,531 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
4,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,276 |
|
Segment income (loss)
before income tax |
|
|
79,406 |
|
|
|
51,596 |
|
|
|
(57,991 |
) |
|
|
(47,203 |
) |
|
|
16,359 |
|
|
|
(66,544 |
) |
|
|
(7,664 |
) |
|
|
(32,041 |
) |
Segment assets |
|
|
4,014,385 |
|
|
|
2,752,186 |
|
|
|
684,115 |
|
|
|
1,533,832 |
|
|
|
130,229 |
|
|
|
541,792 |
|
|
|
(492,326 |
) |
|
|
9,164,213 |
|
139
Reconciliation of Segment Information to Consolidated Amounts
Information for the Corporations reportable segments in relation to the consolidated totals at
December 31, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for reportable segments |
|
$ |
601,010 |
|
|
$ |
744,884 |
|
|
$ |
826,235 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
53,355 |
|
|
|
49,416 |
|
|
|
46,671 |
|
Elimination of intersegment revenues |
|
|
(49,761 |
) |
|
|
(45,694 |
) |
|
|
(50,576 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated revenues |
|
$ |
604,604 |
|
|
$ |
748,606 |
|
|
$ |
822,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income before tax of reportable segments |
|
$ |
128,259 |
|
|
$ |
68,881 |
|
|
$ |
42,167 |
|
Loss before tax of other segments |
|
|
(65,135 |
) |
|
|
(57,163 |
) |
|
|
(66,544 |
) |
Elimination of intersegment profits |
|
|
(10,514 |
) |
|
|
(7,711 |
) |
|
|
(7,664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income (loss) before tax |
|
$ |
52,610 |
|
|
$ |
4,007 |
|
|
$ |
(32,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets for reportable segments |
|
$ |
6,399,666 |
|
|
$ |
8,339,844 |
|
|
$ |
9,114,747 |
|
Assets not attributed to segments |
|
|
1,379,671 |
|
|
|
631,091 |
|
|
|
541,792 |
|
Elimination of intersegment assets |
|
|
(1,012,901 |
) |
|
|
(1,073,359 |
) |
|
|
(492,326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
6,766,436 |
|
|
$ |
7,897,576 |
|
|
$ |
9,164,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140
28. Quarterly Results (Unaudited):
The following table reflects the unaudited quarterly results of the Corporation during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended 2009 |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Interest Income |
|
$ |
128,675 |
|
|
$ |
120,076 |
|
|
$ |
118,080 |
|
|
$ |
115,327 |
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
84,393 |
|
|
|
86,175 |
|
|
|
88,055 |
|
|
|
93,104 |
|
Net Interest Income after Provision
for Loan Losses |
|
|
43,293 |
|
|
|
52,439 |
|
|
|
47,366 |
|
|
|
56,133 |
|
Income (Loss) before Provision for Income Tax |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
20,910 |
|
|
|
7,666 |
|
|
|
24,750 |
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
12,084 |
|
|
|
10,471 |
|
|
|
18,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended 2008 |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Interest Income |
|
$ |
159,029 |
|
|
$ |
153,436 |
|
|
$ |
148,011 |
|
|
$ |
140,295 |
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
84,599 |
|
|
|
91,045 |
|
|
|
92,406 |
|
|
|
88,272 |
|
Net Interest Income after Provision
for Loan Losses |
|
|
45,024 |
|
|
|
52,530 |
|
|
|
46,846 |
|
|
|
36,399 |
|
Income (Loss) before Provision for Income Tax |
|
|
25,939 |
|
|
|
7,281 |
|
|
|
(18,493 |
) |
|
|
(10,720 |
) |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
17,722 |
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
|
|
(8,162 |
) |
|
|
(5,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per Common Share |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended 2007 |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Interest Income |
|
$ |
167,077 |
|
|
$ |
168,242 |
|
|
$ |
170,149 |
|
|
$ |
168,742 |
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
79,402 |
|
|
|
78,197 |
|
|
|
76,039 |
|
|
|
78,041 |
|
Net Interest Income after Provision
for Loan Losses |
|
|
57,378 |
|
|
|
47,347 |
|
|
|
28,689 |
|
|
|
30,441 |
|
Income (Loss) before Provision for Income Tax |
|
|
19,383 |
|
|
|
5,505 |
|
|
|
(55,011 |
) |
|
|
(1,918 |
) |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
|
11,729 |
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
(50,099 |
) |
|
|
(1,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per Common Share |
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
(1.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
141
29. Santander BanCorp (Parent Company Only) Financial Information:
The following financial information presents the financial position of the Parent Company only, as
of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended December 31, 2009.
The net income of Santander Bancorp (parent company only) nominally is not equal to the
consolidated net income of Santander BanCorp and subsidiaries, because it includes a transaction
between Santander BanCorps wholly owned subsidiaries, Banco Santander Puerto Rico and Santander
Securities Corporation, which has a different accounting treatment in the stand-alone financial
statements of each of these entities. Such transaction is eliminated in consolidation.
Santander Bancorp
Balance Sheet Information
December 31, 2009 and 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
3,528 |
|
|
$ |
3,430 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
21,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
25,128 |
|
|
|
3,430 |
|
Loans |
|
|
191,361 |
|
|
|
221,256 |
|
Investment in Subsidiaries |
|
|
821,637 |
|
|
|
772,249 |
|
Accrued Interest Receivable |
|
|
5,680 |
|
|
|
5,928 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
9,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,044,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,012,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
$ |
190,000 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
Subordinated Capital Notes, including $120.6 million and $118.3 million at fair value in
2009 and 2008, respectively |
|
|
248,691 |
|
|
|
246,392 |
|
Accrued Interest Payable |
|
|
5,666 |
|
|
|
7,724 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
|
5,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
447,817 |
|
|
|
459,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $2.50 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 50,650,364 shares issued;
46,639,104 shares outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
126,626 |
|
|
|
126,626 |
|
Capital paid in excess of par value |
|
|
566,286 |
|
|
|
565,165 |
|
Treasury stock at cost, 4,011,260 shares at December 31, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
|
|
(67,552 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of tax |
|
|
(20,695 |
) |
|
|
(22,563 |
) |
Deficit |
|
|
(8,170 |
) |
|
|
(48,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
596,495 |
|
|
|
552,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,044,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,012,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
Santander BanCorp
Statements of Operations Information
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
11,271 |
|
|
$ |
13,914 |
|
|
$ |
17,883 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
11,414 |
|
|
|
14,732 |
|
|
|
19,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
7,454 |
|
|
|
7,549 |
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
Term and subordinated capital notes |
|
|
10,494 |
|
|
|
13,325 |
|
|
|
16,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
17,948 |
|
|
|
20,874 |
|
|
|
30,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest loss |
|
|
(6,534 |
) |
|
|
(6,142 |
) |
|
|
(10,338 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest loss after provision for loan losses |
|
|
(6,534 |
) |
|
|
(6,882 |
) |
|
|
(10,338 |
) |
Other Income (Loss) : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative gains (losses) |
|
|
(7,972 |
) |
|
|
6,770 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
|
|
54,539 |
|
|
|
15,017 |
|
|
|
(24,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (loss) |
|
|
46,567 |
|
|
|
21,787 |
|
|
|
(24,534 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
(615 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other operating expenses |
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income tax |
|
|
37,552 |
|
|
|
12,527 |
|
|
|
(35,875 |
) |
(Benefit) Provision for Income Tax |
|
|
(3,109 |
) |
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
40,661 |
|
|
$ |
9,804 |
|
|
$ |
(35,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
Santander BanCorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
40,661 |
|
|
$ |
9,804 |
|
|
$ |
(35,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (earnings) losses of subsidiaries, net of dividends received |
|
|
(48,539 |
) |
|
|
48,868 |
|
|
|
54,487 |
|
Deferred tax (benefit) provision |
|
|
(3,109 |
) |
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on derivatives |
|
|
7,972 |
|
|
|
(6,770 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Net discount accretion on debt |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Net premiun amortization on loans |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets and accrued interest receivable |
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
(5,083 |
) |
|
|
3,968 |
|
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities and accrued interest payable |
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
4,479 |
|
|
|
(5,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(38,786 |
) |
|
|
45,098 |
|
|
|
53,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
54,902 |
|
|
|
17,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in loans |
|
|
29,823 |
|
|
|
13,364 |
|
|
|
27,178 |
|
Investment in subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
29,823 |
|
|
|
(41,636 |
) |
|
|
27,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of borrowings |
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
235,000 |
|
Repayment of borrowings |
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
(235,000 |
) |
|
|
(275,000 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,790 |
) |
|
|
(29,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(51,790 |
) |
|
|
(69,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
21,698 |
|
|
|
(38,524 |
) |
|
|
(24,936 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
41,954 |
|
|
|
66,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR |
|
$ |
25,128 |
|
|
$ |
3,430 |
|
|
$ |
41,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30. Subsequent Events:
On February 23, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation
approved the participation of fifty-three Corporation officers in the fourth cycle of the Banco
Santander, S.A Performance Shares Plan and the award of restricted stock units to said employees
thereunder. The participants include six of the Corporations executive officers who were named
executive officers for purposes of the Corporations proxy statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders. The Performance Shares Plan is an equity-based plan that provides long-term
incentive opportunities for certain executive officers and managers of Banco Santander S.A. and its
affiliates. Under the Performance Shares Plan, participants receive shares of Banco Santander S.A.
common stock (American Depositary Shares, in the case of native U.S. and Puerto Rico participants)
upon satisfaction of certain pre-established service and performance requirements. Banco Santander
S.A. makes awards under the Performance Shares Plan in cycles, with one cycle ending each year. The
fourth cycle (or I-12 Plan) is for the three-year 2009 through 2011 period with payout of shares
no later than July 31, 2012.
The Corporation has evaluated all subsequent events through the date this Annual Report on Form
10-K was filed with the SEC as significant subsequent events.
144
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. |
None
|
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Corporation maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
provide reasonable assurance that material information, which is required to be timely disclosed,
is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely manner. An evaluation of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) was performed as of
the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed under the supervision
and with the participation of the Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
concluded that the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the
Corporations reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide
reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. The Corporations internal control over financial reporting is designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore,
even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to
financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission in their Internal Control Integrated Framework.
In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management has concluded
that the Corporations internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2009.
The Corporations independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has
audited the effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over financial reporting. Their
report appears herein.
Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
None
|
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
None
145
PART III
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
The information contained under the captions Principal Holders of Capital Stock, Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance, Board of Directors, Nominees for Election,
Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees, Executive Officers and Corporate
Governance of the Corporations definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about
March 26, 2010, is incorporated herein by reference
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Business Conduct within the meaning of Item 406(b) of
Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This Code applies to the
directors, the President and CEO, the CAO, and other executive officers of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries in order to achieve a conduct that reflects the Corporations ethical principles. The
Corporations Code of Business Conduct was amended during fiscal year 2005 to expressly apply to
the directors of the Corporation, as required by the NYSEs Corporate Governance Rule 303A.10. The
Corporation has posted a copy of the Code of Business Conduct, as amended, on its website at
www.santandernet.com. The Corporation also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which are
available on the Investor Relations website at
www.santandernet.com, as required by the NYSEs
Corporate Governance Rule 303A.09. Copies of the Code of Business Conduct and the Corporate
Governance Guidelines may be obtained free of charge from the Corporations website at the
abovementioned internet address.
|
|
|
ITEM 11. |
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information under the caption Compensation of Executive Officers of the definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 26, 2010, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS |
The information under the caption Principal Holders of Capital Stock of the definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 26, 2010, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information under the caption Transactions with Related Parties of the definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 26, 2010, is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information under the caption Disclosure of Audit Fees of the definitive Proxy Statement to
be filed with the SEC on or about March 26, 2010, is incorporated herein by reference.
146
PART IV
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SCHEDULES |
|
A. |
|
The following documents are incorporated by reference from Item 8 hereof: |
|
(1) |
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years
Ended December 31 2009, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 |
|
|
(2) |
|
Financial Statement Schedules are not presented because the information
is not applicable or is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements described
in A (1) above or in the notes thereto. |
|
|
(3) |
|
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index on page 154 of this report are
filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference. |
147
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there
unto duly authorized
|
|
|
|
|
|
SANTANDER BANCORP
(REGISTRANT)
|
|
Dated: 03/05/2010 |
By: |
/S/ JUAN MORENO BLANCO
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: 03/05/2010 |
By: |
/S/ ROBERTO JARA
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and |
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of this Registrant and in the capacities and
on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
S:\ GONZALO DE LAS HERAS
|
|
Chairman
|
|
03/05/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
S:\ JESUS M. ZABALZA
|
|
Director
|
|
03/05/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
S:\ VICTOR ARBULU
|
|
Director
|
|
03/05/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
S:\ ROBERTO VALENTIN
|
|
Director
|
|
03/05/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
S:\ STEPHEN FERRISS
|
|
Director
|
|
03/05/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
S:\ MARIA CALERO
|
|
Director
|
|
03/05/2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
S:\ JOSE R. GONZALEZ
|
|
Director
|
|
03/05/2010 |
148
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
Reference |
(3.1)
|
|
Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation |
|
Exhibit 3.1-10Q-06/30/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0)
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
|
Exhibit 8-K-04/01/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
(10.1)
|
|
Loan Agreement Agreement between Santander BanCorp, Santander Financial
Services, Inc. and Banco Santander Puerto Rico
|
|
Exhibit 8K-01/27/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
Exhibit 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant
|
|
Exhibit 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1)
|
|
Certification from the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Exhibit 31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(31.2)
|
|
Certification from the Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Exhibit 31.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(32.1)
|
|
Certification from the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Exhibit 32.2 |
149