UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal
year ended January 2, 2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission file number 0-16611
GSI COMMERCE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
|
04-2958132
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
935 FIRST AVENUE, KING OF PRUSSIA, PA
|
|
|
19406
|
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
|
(Zip Code
|
)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(610) 491-7000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants voting stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the close of
business on July 3, 2009, was approximately $360,296,158
based on a per share price of $14.39, the closing price of the
registrants common stock on the trading day prior to the
end of the registrants second fiscal quarter, as reported
on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market.(1)
There were 60,392,539 shares of the registrants
Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on
March 1, 2010.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(Specific sections incorporated are identified under applicable
items herein)
Certain information required for Parts II and III of
this
Form 10-K,
to the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated herein by
reference to the Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This amount equals the number of
outstanding shares of the registrants common stock reduced
by the number of shares that may be deemed held by the
registrants executive officers, directors and stockholders
owning in excess of 10% of the registrants common stock,
multiplied by the last reported sale price for the
registrants common stock on July 3, 2009 the last
trading day prior to the last day of registrants second
fiscal quarter. This information is provided solely for record
keeping purposes of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
shall not be construed as an admission that any executive
officer, director or 10% stockholder of the registrant is an
affiliate of the registrant or is the beneficial owner of any
such shares. Any such inference is hereby disclaimed.
|
GSI
COMMERCE, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2, 2010
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest the
last day of December. The Companys fiscal year ends are as
follows:
|
|
|
References To
|
|
Refer to The Years Ended/Ending
|
|
Fiscal 2005
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
Fiscal 2006
|
|
December 30, 2006
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
December 29, 2007
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
January 2, 2010
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
January 1, 2011
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
December 29, 2012
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
December 28, 2013
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
January 3, 2015
|
PART I
Overview
We are a leading provider of
e-commerce
and interactive marketing services to large businesses that sell
products directly to consumers (b2c). We operate in three
business segments
e-commerce
services, interactive marketing services and consumer
engagement. Within these segments, we provide services to more
than 500 retailers and brands, including: 7 for all
Mankind®;
Aeropostale®;
American Eagle
Outfitters®,
Avis®,
Bath & Body
Works®,
British
Airways®,
Calvin
Klein®,
Christopher &
Banks®,
Cole
Haan®,
Dell®,
Dicks Sporting
Goods®,
Estee
Lauder®,
Expedia®,
HP®,
Major League
Baseball®,
the
NFL®,
Philips®,
Publishers Clearing
House®,
RalphLauren.com®,
Sports
Authority®,
The
TJX®
Companies, Tory
Burch®,
Toys R
Us®,
Tumi®,
Warnaco®
and the Washington Post Newspapers, Inc.
®
Our services enable retailers and brands to build and grow their
e-commerce
and multichannel businesses. By working with us, we believe
companies gain access to high quality technologies, a proven,
integrated and scalable infrastructure, and interactive
marketing expertise. Further, by investing continuously in our
offerings, we provide a broader range of high-quality
capabilities than our clients could justify building,
implementing and maintaining on their own. As we continue to
invest in our services, infrastructure and expertise, we believe
that we increase our overall value to our clients.
In our
e-commerce
services business, we deliver customized solutions to clients
through an
e-commerce
platform, which is comprised of three components: technology,
fulfillment and customer care / call center services.
We offer each of the platforms components on a modular
basis or as part of an integrated,
end-to-end
solution.
In our interactive marketing services business, we offer
comprehensive digital and traditional agency and
e-mail
marketing services that include brand development and strategic
account planning, user experience and creative design,
interactive marketing, traditional advertising, media buying,
video, marketing content and promotional development,
e-mail
marketing and distribution, Web store usability, and product
photography and content development.
In our consumer engagement business, we offer retailers and
brands an online platform to sell excess inventory in the
private sales channel as well as through an off-price
marketplace. The private sales channel is an online platform
that uses sales limited in time and inventory to create an
efficient and effective channel for brands to sell excess
inventory in a brand-friendly environment designed to protect
the brands image and enhance brand visibility. Our
off-price marketplace is an online alternative sales channel for
manufacturers, brands, distributors and other retailers to
liquidate inventory.
For additional information about our business segments, see
Note 14, Segment Information, to our consolidated
financial statements included in Item 15, Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedule, of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
e-Commerce
Services
Overview
We provide
e-commerce
services domestically and internationally that enable b2c
companies to operate
e-commerce
and multichannel retailing businesses. Our services include a
comprehensive suite of Web and
e-commerce
technologies, fulfillment and customer care / call
center services. We offer components of these services as part
of an integrated
e-commerce
platform as well as on a modular basis. Additionally, our
e-commerce
services include technical Web and
e-commerce
development services, buying services, value-added fulfillment
services, and third-party services we resell to our clients.
We believe that our
e-commerce
services help clients grow their
e-commerce
and multichannel businesses faster and more profitably than they
could on their own. As retailers and brands place a greater
emphasis on developing their online channels, they are
challenged to make the level of investment required to support
high-quality, multichannel,
e-commerce
businesses. The online businesses of our clients and prospects
often account for
1
a small, but growing percentage of their companies overall
businesses, which makes their online businesses too important to
ignore, but often not large enough to justify the initial and
continuing investment required for a robust
e-commerce
offering.
We continually seek to broaden the scope of our services and
capabilities to help our clients grow their
e-commerce
businesses and enhance their customers online experience.
Our
e-commerce
services can be customized to provide solutions that best fit
the needs of our clients. We continually upgrade or enhance our
core set of platform components to gain efficiencies, improve
performance and provide solutions that encourage the growth of
our clients businesses.
We provide
e-commerce
services to clients that manage their own inventory and to
clients for which we purchase and own the inventory. In cases
where product is owned by the client, the client is the seller
of the merchandise, establishes product prices and pays us
service fees based either on a fixed or variable percentage of
revenues, or based on the activities we perform. In cases where
our clients have us select and purchase inventory from product
manufacturers and other vendors, we operate the clients
e-commerce
site on their behalf (under their brand or name) and we sell the
inventory directly to consumers.
When we own the inventory, we establish the prices for products
that we offer, and to the extent possible, we strategically
price products sold through a clients
e-commerce
business to be consistent with the pricing for the same products
at that clients retail stores. Accordingly, prices for the
same products may differ across our clients
e-commerce
businesses. Generally, we pay a percentage of revenues to the
respective clients in exchange for the right to use their brand
or names, logos and Web site address in the operation of their
e-commerce
business and for their commitment to promote and advertise their
e-commerce
business. This model is used primarily for our relationships
with sporting goods retailers. A similar owned
inventory model is used with our licensed products
business and most of our professional sports leagues and some
entertainment companies with the primary difference being that
we have licensing agreements with the clients to sell selected
products on their Web sites.
To facilitate our selection and purchasing of inventory, we have
a buying organization that procures products in the merchandise
categories of sporting goods, consumer electronics and licensed
entertainment and sporting goods products. In the case of
sporting goods, we use a common pool of owned sporting goods
inventory, which allows us to offer a broad assortment while
efficiently managing the inventory. We also have business to
business (b2b) relationships with several clients to sell
sporting goods and licensed products we own to their customers
through their Web stores or other retail channels. We sell
products to these b2b clients from our inventory or through our
network of drop shippers and fulfill customer orders on behalf
of these clients. We believe that we have strong relationships
with our vendors and sources of unique products, and we
regularly seek to add new vendors, brands and sources of unique
products. During fiscal 2009, we purchased $41.3 million of
inventory from one vendor, which accounted for 18.2% of the
total dollar amount of inventory we purchased.
Technology
Services
We build and operate our clients Web stores using our
proprietary, hosted
e-commerce
software solution, which enables a complete online shopping
experience tailored to our clients brands. This solution
includes a broad set of configurable features and functions,
such as product presentation, merchandising, shopping cart and
checkout, that enable the buying and selling of products online.
On a selective basis, we also integrate specialized, third-party
software applications into our solution.
We provide our clients with proprietary Web store management
tools to manage their Web stores administration, product
and catalog content and reporting. These tools help clients to
create and manage product categories, marketing and descriptive
content, product images, advertisements and promotions,
merchandising, inventory, cross-selling and up-selling, and
search capabilities.
We provide hosting services for our clients Web stores and
related systems. These services are hosted in two data centers,
which are co-located with a leading third-party
telecommunications company. We actively manage and monitor the
operations and infrastructure of these data centers.
2
We can manage all aspects of orders placed through our
clients Web stores through our order management and
processing system, including credit card payments, alternative
payments, private-label credit cards, promotions, gift card
purchase and redemption, shipping fees, taxes, and other service
fees such as for gift wrapping.
We can also provide our clients with continuous access to a
secure, Web-based, analytics portal with reporting and
analytical capabilities including demand, merchandising,
marketing, click stream, and Web metrics.
Fulfillment
and Drop Shipping Services
We offer a range of order fulfillment services through seven
fulfillment centers five in the U.S., one in Canada,
and one in Europe. Our fulfillment centers support
multicategory, b2c requirements and can be used as a part of an
integrated offering with our Web Store technologies and customer
care and call center operations or utilized as a stand-alone
module integrated with a clients third party applications
and operations.
As of March 1, 2010, our total fulfillment footprint was
approximately 2.7 million square feet. We also integrate
with and manage a network of about 750 third-party, drop-ship
vendors as well as with certain clients who perform their own
fulfillment.
We also process orders and provide fulfillment for clients that
directly market products through television advertisements
(infomercials), the Web and over the telephone and provide
fulfillment services for specialized award programs.
We maintain relationships with major freight carriers and offer
ShipQuik, a customized shipping program for the
U.S., which uses our operational scale to improve ship times at
competitive prices. We also offer iShip, an
international shipping program that allows a U.S. customer
to ship purchased products to approximately 30 European, South
American and Asian countries.
Customer
Care and Call Center Services
We provide customer care and call center services 24 hours
per day, seven days per week through four customer care centers
in the U.S. and one customer care center in the U.K. When
needed, we utilize third-parties to add customer service
capacity. We also deploy our customer care application remotely
for clients that provide their own customer care services. Our
customer care applications and informational tools can provide a
360-degree
view and access to customer information including service
history, previous purchases, personal preferences, product
information, inventory availability and order status. Our
customer care tools are integrated with our order management and
fulfillment operations to provide a consistent experience across
all customer touch points including our clients Web
stores, direct mail, newspaper circulars, catalogs, promotional
events and direct response television campaigns. These tools can
also be integrated with clients or third-party
applications.
Interactive
Marketing Services
Overview
We provide brand development and strategic account planning,
user experience and creative design, interactive marketing,
affiliate marketing, studio services (photography and content
development) as well as traditional media services through our
in-house digital marketing agency,
TrueActiontm.
We also provide advanced
e-mail
marketing and data services and solutions through our
subsidiary,
e-Dialog,
Inc.
Digital
Marketing Agency Services
With an understanding of data and customer insights, we work
with our clients to develop, implement and manage marketing
initiatives and compelling Web store features, functions and
content. We also offer traditional print and media services such
as print advertising, video, marketing content development and
promotional campaigns. These initiatives are aimed at increasing
sales for our
e-commerce
clients and non-platform clients products and
promoting consistency for client brands across all customer
channels. We have combined our
e-commerce
expertise, our familiarity with our clients online
businesses and our skills in interactive and traditional
marketing to offer a comprehensive suite of marketing services.
Our
e-commerce
clients benefit from the integrated
3
relationship between our interactive marketing services and our
e-commerce
platform, which gives us significant insight and knowledge about
our clients
direct-to-consumer
businesses.
We help clients develop and increase the strength and
consistency of their brand(s) online and across multiple
channels by developing the overall messaging, imagery and tone
for those brands.
We also work with our clients to develop strategies and create
online brand experiences that are intuitive and easy to use and
that affect our clients customers needs and
behaviors. Our team of design, usability research, and
technology professionals collaborates with our clients to create
custom online experiences that reinforce our clients
offline presence. We also use our
state-of-the-art
usability lab to test shoppers experiences with our
clients Web stores design, navigation and content
and to provide valuable insight and feedback into customer
shopping and purchasing habits and expectations.
We create and produce product images and descriptive content for
our clients Web stores that is consistent with our
clients branding. We operate an in-house professional
digital photography studio to create product presentations
designed to inform online shoppers and encourage purchases.
We develop, implement and manage strategic marketing programs
for our clients that are designed to increase online exposure,
generate incremental revenue, drive new customer acquisition and
maximize the return on our clients marketing investment.
We help our clients create favorable product marketplace and
brand positioning opportunities using our marketing research and
analysis. We create and manage marketing programs that include
paid and natural search engine marketing (SEM) & search
engine optimization (SEO), comparison shopping engines (CSEs),
online advertising, contextually relevant publisher sites,
blogs, social networks, affiliate marketing, and emerging media
opportunities.
We also measure and analyze consumer purchasing behavior and use
the intelligence to help optimize marketing campaigns for our
clients.
The agency also owns and operates an affiliate marketing
network. We believe affiliate marketing is an effective tool
that has helped our clients grow their online businesses.
e-Mail
Marketing Services
We provide advanced
e-mail
marketing and database technologies, products, strategies, and
services for permission-based
e-mail
marketers in the U.S. and in Europe.
We offer
e-mail
marketers a comprehensive and integrated set of tools that
combines campaign management, data segmentation, in-depth
reporting, analysis and performance. We offer a broad range of
service offerings that include campaign management (for
full-service and collaborative relationships), strategy,
analytics, data services, data integration, creative, advanced
applications, deliverability/ISP relations, and response
management. Custom solutions include development of a custom
content collection interface (CCI), workflow optimization and
specialized conversion and Web tracking. We offer clients a
range of service delivery options depending on their
e-mail
marketing needs including full-service, self-service and
collaborative relationship solutions, which clients can rely on
us for training, custom applications and production assistance
whenever the expertise is needed.
Consumer
Engagement
Overview
We provide retailers and brands with an online platform to sell
excess inventory in the private sale channel through Rue
La La, as well as in the off-price marketplace through
SmartBargains.
Online
Private Sale Channel
We provide an online platform that brings the sample
sale concept online and creates an efficient and effective
channel for brands to merchandise and sell excess inventory in a
brand-friendly environment designed to protect the brands
image and enhance brand visibility. We utilize a viral and
cost-efficient marketing strategy based on member referrals
through
e-mail to
grow the membership base. Members receive daily
e-mails
alerting them to
4
the sales of the day which builds anticipation and excitement
among the membership. Sales are limited both in time
and inventory, which adds a sense of urgency to the promotion
for the consumer.
Off-Price
Marketplace
We provide an online platform for the sale of off-price
merchandise across a wide, cross-section of categories. This is
an online alternative sales channel for manufacturers, brands,
distributors and other retailers to liquidate inventory.
Growth
Strategy
Our objective is to grow our business by:
|
|
|
|
|
expanding the
e-commerce
services client base;
|
|
|
|
retaining clients, growing their businesses and selling
additional services;
|
|
|
|
growing the interactive marketing services business;
|
|
|
|
growing the consumer engagement business;
|
|
|
|
expanding globally; and
|
|
|
|
selectively pursuing strategic acquisitions.
|
Expand
the
e-Commerce
Services Client Base
We continue to grow our client base primarily through the
efforts of our in-house sales organization and sales support
group. We seek to attract new clients by providing solutions
that enable companies to grow their
e-commerce
businesses more rapidly and cost-effectively than they could on
their own. We believe our clients select our
e-commerce
solutions for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership position and proven track record We
believe we are among the industrys leading providers of
e-commerce
services and we have successfully delivered our
e-commerce
services to clients since 1999.
|
|
|
|
Broad and flexible suite of services We believe we
offer one of the industrys broadest suites of
e-commerce
services which can be delivered as integrated or modular
solutions depending on specific client objectives.
|
|
|
|
Expertise We have knowledge that comes from working
with
e-commerce
businesses for 10 years.
|
|
|
|
Meaningful scale We have large, aggregate volume on
our
e-commerce
services platform with significant operating infrastructure.
|
Retain
Clients, Grow Their Businesses and Sell Additional
Services
The financial benefit that we derive from our
e-commerce
service relationships with our clients is primarily tied to the
performance of their
e-commerce
businesses. Accordingly, it is part of our strategy to grow our
business by growing our clients
e-commerce
businesses. It is therefore important for us to build long-term
and multifaceted relationships with our clients and to provide
services and create opportunities for our clients to grow their
businesses.
For our
e-commerce
services clients, we typically have long-term, exclusive
contracts. When our
e-commerce
services contracts come up for renewal, the majority of our
e-commerce
clients renew their relationship with us for multiple years.
Long-term and multifaceted relationships provide opportunity to
sell additional services such as those we offer through our
marketing services and consumer engagement businesses.
Grow
Our Interactive Marketing Services Business
We also grow by adding interactive marketing services clients as
well as expanding the scope of services used by existing
clients. We expect industry growth trends showing more marketing
dollars moving from traditional
5
marketing channels to online and other interactive channels to
continue. We believe this shift in marketing channels provides
us with the opportunity to sell additional marketing services to
existing clients and helps us obtain new marketing services
clients outside of those on our
e-commerce
platform.
Drive
Consumer Engagement
We grow by offering Rue La La, our online private sales
channel, and SmartBargains, our off-price merchandise
marketplace. Both offerings were acquired in 2009.
Expand
Globally
Through organic development and strategic acquisitions, we have
built, and continue to add
e-commerce
and marketing services to our international offering. As we add
more
e-commerce
services clients internationally, we would also expect to grow
our international interactive marketing services business. We
grow internationally by signing new clients based outside of
North America and by expanding our relationships with our
existing North American clients that have global brands and
want to expand the online presence of those brands
internationally. Our international operations do not currently
represent a material portion of our business.
Selectively
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions
We also intend to continue to grow by selectively acquiring
companies that enhance existing capabilities, or provide new
capabilities strategic to either
e-commerce,
interactive marketing, or consumer engagement services, add
operational scale, or provide geographic expansion. From 2007
through November 2009, we completed six such acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
Accretive Commerce, an
e-commerce
solutions company;
|
|
|
|
Zendor.com, a provider of fulfillment and customer care in the
U.K.;
|
|
|
|
e-Dialog, a
provider of advanced
e-mail
marketing services and solutions;
|
|
|
|
Silverlign, an integrated marketing strategy and design agency;
|
|
|
|
Pepperjam, an affiliate marketing network and interactive
marketing agency specializing in search; and
|
|
|
|
Retail Convergence Inc., operator of Rue La La and
SmartBargains.
|
Competition
e-Commerce
Services
The market for the development and operation of
e-commerce
businesses is continuously evolving and intensely competitive.
Many of our prospective
e-commerce
services clients evaluate managing all aspects of an
e-commerce
operation with internal resources. As a result, we often compete
with in-house solutions promoted and supported by internal
information technology staffs, merchandising groups and other
internal corporate constituencies as well as with technology and
service providers that supply one or more components of an
e-commerce
solution that allow prospects to develop and operate their
e-commerce
business in-house. This group of providers may include the
prospective client itself and companies that offer: Web
platforms (ATG, IBM and Microsoft); customer care /call center
services (West and Convergys); fulfillment and logistics (DHL
and UPS); and systems integrators (Accenture, EDS, Sapient,
Infosys and IBM). We also compete with the online and offline
businesses of a variety of retailers and manufacturers in our
targeted categories.
We believe that we compete with
e-commerce
competitors primarily on the basis of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
offering the choice of a complete integrated solution or a
component-based solution, both of which are designed to increase
efficiencies and improve integration;
|
|
|
|
promoting the clients brand and business not
our own;
|
|
|
|
providing scale and operating leverage with an enterprise focus;
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
establishing our commitment to invest in and grow our
platform; and
|
|
|
|
aligning our financial interests with those of our clients.
|
Interactive
Marketing Services
The market for interactive marketing services is continuously
evolving and intensely competitive. Our prospective interactive
marketing services clients evaluate managing their marketing
services with internal resources as well as through digital
marketing agencies. As a result, we often compete with in-house
solutions promoted and supported by internal marketing
departments as well as with service providers that supply one or
more interactive marketing services. This group of providers may
include the prospective client itself and companies that offer:
e-mail
management and data aggregation (Experian,
Harte-Hanks
and Epsilon); and online marketing and design services (digital
marketing services agencies such as Omnicom Group, WPP Group,
Publicis and the Interpublic Group of Companies)
We believe that we compete with marketing services competitors
primarily on the basis of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
offering digital marketing solutions that are integrated with
our
e-commerce
platform, which provide a more strategic, cohesive and optimized
approach to growing
e-commerce
businesses; and
|
|
|
|
providing a services approach to
e-mail
marketing that utilizes a proprietary relevance technology to
promote stronger customer engagements that are designed to
increase revenues, profitability and return on investment.
|
Consumer
Engagement
The competitive marketplace for the online liquidation of
merchandise is also extremely competitive and consists of two
principal types of businesses the online private
sale space and online outlets that sell off-price merchandise.
Competitors in the online private sale space in North America
include companies such as Gilt Groupe, HauteLook, and ideeli.
Competitors in online off-price merchandise include companies
such as Overstock.com and
e-Bay.
We believe that we compete with online, product liquidation
competitors primarily on the basis of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
offering effective solutions for brands to move inventory and
drive brand revenue while maintaining brand desirability;
|
|
|
|
securing desirable merchandise and providing products to
consumers in an expanding list of merchandise categories
including fashion, jewelry, accessories, footwear and home;
|
|
|
|
using highly effective, viral marketing campaigns that drive
membership growth with low acquisition costs; and
|
|
|
|
having a low inventory investment with quick and discrete
sell-through of merchandise.
|
Intellectual
Property
Our
e-commerce
and e-mail
platforms include certain proprietary technology. To protect our
proprietary rights in services and technology, we rely on
various intellectual property laws and contractual restrictions.
These include confidentiality, trade secret law, invention
assignment and nondisclosure agreements with our clients,
employees, contractors and suppliers. Despite these precautions,
it may be possible for a third-party to copy or otherwise obtain
and use our intellectual property without our authorization.
We use our clients names, URLs, logos and other marks in
connection with the operation and promotion of their
e-commerce
businesses. Our agreements with our clients provide us with
licenses generally to use this intellectual property in
connection with the operation of their
e-commerce
businesses. These licenses typically are coterminous with the
respective agreements.
7
We also rely on technologies that we license from third parties.
These licenses may not continue to be available to us on
commercially reasonable terms in the future. As a result, we may
be required to obtain substitute technology of lower quality or
at greater cost, which could materially adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Employees
As of February 12, 2010, we employed approximately
5,500 people worldwide. We had approximately
5,100 full-time employees and 117 part-time employees
in the U.S. and 268 full-time and 22 part-time
employees internationally. Globally, approximately
4,500 employees work in
e-commerce
services, 794 work in interactive marketing services and 216
work in consumer engagement. Employment levels may fluctuate due
to the seasonal nature of our
e-commerce
services and consumer engagement businesses. In addition, we use
independent contractors and temporary personnel. None of our
employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and
we consider our relationship with our employees to be good.
Competition for qualified personnel in our industry is intense.
We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our
continued ability to attract, hire and retain qualified
personnel.
Investor
Information
We are subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Therefore, we file reports and
information, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Such reports, proxy and
information statements and other information may be obtained by
visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at
100 F Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549 or by calling
the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site
(http://www.sec.gov)
that contains reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
You can access financial and other information at our Investor
Relations Web site. The address is
www.gsicommerce.com/investors. We make available through our Web
site, free of charge, copies of our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as
reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically
or otherwise furnishing it to the SEC. In addition, we will
provide, at no cost, paper or electronic copies of our reports
and other filings made with the SEC. Requests should be directed
to Investor Relations, 935 First Avenue, King of Prussia,
Pennsylvania, 19406. The information on the Web site listed
above is not and should not be considered part of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
and is not incorporated by reference in this document. This Web
site is and is only intended to be an inactive textual reference.
We are a Delaware corporation organized in 1986. Our executive
offices are located at 935 First Avenue, King of Prussia,
Pennsylvania, 19406. Our telephone number is
(610) 491-7000.
We
operate in rapidly changing industries and have recently entered
new lines of business, all of which make our operating results
difficult to predict.
The industries in which we operate are rapidly changing and
evolving. The evolution of these industries makes our risks,
capital needs and operating results difficult to predict. Any
failure to adapt our services in response to changing market and
technological requirements could adversely affect our operating
results. In connection with recent acquisitions, we have also
recently entered into new lines of business: the online private
sale business, the off-price
e-commerce
marketplace business and the affiliate marketing business. The
online private sale business is an especially new and unproven
business model. We have limited experience in these new lines of
business, and we will be required to devote substantial
financial, technical, managerial and other resources to them. We
cannot assure you that these new lines of business will be
successful.
8
We may
not achieve the expected benefits of acquisitions and
investments.
We have acquired a number of companies and invested in a number
of companies, products and technologies, and we may acquire
additional companies or invest in additional companies, products
or technologies in the future. These transactions are
accompanied by a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
failure of acquired companies to achieve planned results;
|
|
|
|
unanticipated problems and liabilities of acquired companies,
including patent and trademark infringement claims, violations
of laws, commercial disputes and tax liabilities;
|
|
|
|
difficulties resolving indemnification disputes with previous
owners;
|
|
|
|
disruptions to our ongoing business;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in retention and assimilation of the employees of
the acquired business;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in assimilation of acquired operations, technology,
products
and/or
services;
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of integrating a new companys accounting,
financial reporting, management, information, human resource and
other administrative systems to permit effective management, and
the lack of control if such integration is delayed or not
implemented; and
|
|
|
|
diversion of management and employee time and focus.
|
These transactions may also result in dilutive issuances of our
equity securities, use of our cash resources, and incurrence of
debt and amortization expenses related to intangible assets. Our
failure to be successful in addressing these risks or other
problems encountered in connection with our past or future
acquisitions and investments could cause us to fail to realize
the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions or investments. In
addition, valuations supporting our acquisitions and investments
could change. We could determine that such valuations have
experienced impairments or
other-than-temporary
declines in fair value which could adversely impact our
financial results.
Our
failure to manage growth and diversification of our business
could harm us.
We are continuing our efforts to grow and diversify our business
both in the United States and internationally. This has placed,
and will continue to place, demands on our management, as well
as on our operational and financial infrastructure. To
effectively manage our growth initiatives, we will need to
continue to expand, improve and adapt our personnel, operations,
infrastructure and our financial, information and other systems
and continue to implement adequate controls. These enhancements
and improvements are likely to be complex and could require
significant capital expenditures and allocation of valuable
management resources. We may also have to expand our management
team by recruiting and employing additional experienced
executives and employees. If we are unable to adapt our systems
and business, put adequate controls in place and expand our
management team in a timely manner to accommodate our growth,
our business may be adversely affected.
We
plan to continue to expand our business internationally which
may cause our business to become increasingly susceptible to
numerous international business risks and challenges. We have
limited experience in international operations.
For fiscal 2009, substantially all of our net revenues, income
from operations and assets were in the United States. Our
growth strategy involves expanding our business internationally,
and since 2006, we have completed acquisitions of companies in
Spain and the United Kingdom and opened a fulfillment center in
Canada. However, we have limited experience in international
business, and we cannot assure you that our international
expansion strategy will be successful. Our experience in the
United States may not be relevant to our ability to expand
internationally. In addition, our lack of a track record outside
the United States increases our execution risks and the risks
described below.
9
International expansion is subject to inherent risks and
challenges that could adversely affect our business, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the need to develop new supplier and manufacturer relationships,
particularly because major manufacturers may require that our
international operations deal with local distributors;
|
|
|
|
substantial competition with local companies;
|
|
|
|
compliance with international legal and regulatory requirements
and tariffs (see also Existing or future laws
or regulations could harm our business or marketing
efforts, below);
|
|
|
|
managing fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection;
|
|
|
|
potential adverse tax consequences;
|
|
|
|
uncertain political and economic climates;
|
|
|
|
potentially higher incidence of fraud;
|
|
|
|
different employer/employee relationships;
|
|
|
|
cultural ambivalence toward, or non-acceptance of,
e-commerce
businesses;
|
|
|
|
language barriers;
|
|
|
|
price controls or other restrictions on foreign
currency; and
|
|
|
|
difficulties in obtaining export and import licenses and
compliance with applicable export controls.
|
Some of these factors may cause our international costs of doing
business to exceed our comparable domestic costs. Any negative
impact from our international business efforts could negatively
impact our business, results of operations and financial
condition as a whole.
We may
not be able to compete successfully against current and future
competitors.
Our businesses are rapidly evolving and intensely competitive.
In our
e-commerce
services segment, we face competition from in-house
e-commerce
solutions, technology and service providers which supply one or
more components of an
e-commerce
solution and other providers of integrated
e-commerce
solutions. Low barriers to entry into the
e-commerce
solutions market may increase the number of competitors our
e-commerce
business may face. As we continue to expand internationally, our
e-commerce
services segment will face increased competition from local
companies which may have a greater understanding of, and focus
on, the local customer. Our
e-commerce
services segment has competitors with longer operating
histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition or
greater financial, marketing and other resources. Those
competitors may be able to secure merchandise on more favorable
terms and devote more resources to technology development and
marketing than our
e-commerce
services segment.
In our interactive marketing services segment, we face
competition from other providers of interactive marketing
services, other providers of traditional marketing services and
in-house marketing departments. Low barriers to entry in the
interactive marketing industry may increase the number of
competitors our interactive marketing services business may
face. International expansion of our interactive marketing
services segment will increase our exposure to competition with
local companies who may have a competitive advantage because of
their understanding of the needs of local businesses and
consumers. Our interactive marketing services segment has
competitors with longer operating histories, larger customer
bases, greater brand recognition or greater financial, marketing
and other resources who are able to devote more resources to
technology development and marketing.
In our consumer engagement segment, we face competition from the
offline businesses of retailers and manufacturers and other
e-commerce
Web sites. New private sale Web sites may be created and
traditional
10
liquidators and online retailers may develop services that
compete with our online private sale channel and off-price
marketplace. If our competitors are able to secure merchandise
on more favorable terms, our consumer engagement business could
be harmed. In addition, manufacturers and retailers may decide
to create their own Web sites for selling excess inventory.
Local companies will have a competitive advantage over our
consumer engagement segment as we expand internationally.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete
successfully against current and future competitors. In
addition, competition may intensify as our competitors enter
into business combinations or alliances and established
companies in other market segments or geographic markets expand
into our market segments or geographic markets. If we cannot
compete successfully against our competitors, our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be
negatively impacted.
Our
business is highly seasonal; a weak fourth quarter would have a
material adverse effect on our operating results for the
year.
Our fourth fiscal quarter has accounted for and is expected to
continue to account for a disproportionate amount of our total
annual revenues. For fiscal 2009, 42.8% of our annual net
revenues were generated in our fourth fiscal quarter. For fiscal
2008 and fiscal 2007, 40.5% and 44.7% of our annual net revenues
were generated in our fourth fiscal quarter, respectively. Since
fiscal 1999, we have not generated net income in any fiscal
quarter other than a fourth fiscal quarter. Our results of
operations historically have been seasonal primarily because
consumers increase their purchases during the fourth quarter
holiday season.
Because our fourth quarter accounts for a larger percentage of
our annual revenue, any negative impact on our business during
the fourth quarter will have a disproportionate adverse affect
on our results of operations for the full year. Certain
significant components of our expenses, including rent,
utilities, maintenance and other facility-related expenses and
the costs of our information technology systems, are incurred
throughout the year at amounts required in order to maintain the
capacity required during our fourth quarter. In addition, we
have significant cash requirements in the months leading up to
our fourth quarter in anticipation of higher sales volume during
the fourth quarter, including expenses for additional inventory,
advertising and employees. Our fourth quarter results could be
lower than expected if, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
we and our clients do not increase inventory levels for popular
products in sufficient amounts or are unable to restock popular
products in a timely manner, and we or our clients fail to meet
customer demand;
|
|
|
|
we overstock products and are required to take significant
inventory markdowns or write-offs, which could reduce profits;
|
|
|
|
too many consumers access our and our clients
e-commerce
Webstores within a short period of time due to increased holiday
or other demand or we inaccurately forecast consumer traffic,
and as a result we experience system interruptions that make our
and our clients
e-commerce
Webstores unavailable or prevent us from transmitting orders to
our fulfillment operations; or
|
|
|
|
we are unable to adequately staff our fulfillment and customer
service centers during these peak periods.
|
If for any reason our fourth fiscal quarter results were
substantially below expectations, our operating results for the
full year would be materially adversely affected.
General
economic conditions may adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
General economic conditions may adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition. The direction and relative
strength of the global economy continues to be uncertain due to
recent softness in the real estate and mortgage markets,
volatility in fuel and other energy costs, varying economic
conditions in different countries, difficulties in the financial
services sector and credit markets, high levels of unemployment
and other macro-economic factors. Consumer uncertainty about
current economic conditions could adversely affect consumer
confidence and behavior in ways that adversely affect our
results of operations and financial condition. For example, the
economic uncertainty could cause consumers to reduce their
discretionary purchases of goods which
11
we and our clients sell. This in turn could result in slower
inventory turnover and could cause us or our clients to have
greater markdowns on inventory.
We
have an accumulated deficit and may incur additional
losses.
Since 2001, we have recorded net losses in all but two of our
fiscal years. As of the end of fiscal 2009, we had an
accumulated deficit of $165.6 million. If we fail to
generate sufficient revenue from our existing clients, add an
appropriate number of new clients or adequately control our
expenses, we may not be able to return to profitability. We will
continue to incur significant operating expenses and capital
expenditures as we seek to expand our operations and enhance our
capabilities. If we incur expenses at a greater pace than we
generate revenues, we could incur additional losses.
We may
not be able to access on satisfactory terms, or at all, the
credit and capital markets as needed to finance a portion of our
working capital requirements and support our liquidity
needs.
We rely upon access to the credit and capital markets as a
source of liquidity for the portion of our working capital and
debt repayment requirements, infrastructure needs and
consideration for acquisitions and strategic investments not
provided by cash from operations or investments. We may in the
future need to seek additional equity or debt financing. We may
not be able to obtain financing on satisfactory terms or at all.
If we issue securities to raise capital, our existing
stockholders may experience dilution or the new securities may
have rights senior to those of our common stock. In addition,
the terms of these securities could impose restrictions on our
operations.
Market disruptions such as those recently experienced in the
United States and abroad may increase our cost of borrowing or
adversely affect our ability to access sources of liquidity. If
the lenders in our secured revolving bank credit facility are
unable to meet their obligations to provide loans to us under
the terms of the credit facility, if we are unable to access
credit at competitive rates, or at all, if our short-term or
long-term borrowing costs dramatically increase, or if we are
not able to obtain financing on satisfactory terms or at all,
our ability to finance our operations, meet our short-term
obligations and implement our operating strategy could be
adversely affected which may limit our growth potential and our
ability to execute our business strategy.
Our
substantial leverage and significant debt service obligations
could adversely affect our financial condition and our ability
to fulfill our obligations and operate our
business.
We currently have and expect to continue to have a significant
amount of indebtedness. As of January 2, 2010, including
our outstanding convertible notes, borrowings under our secured
revolving bank credit facility and capital leases, we had
approximately $205.8 million of indebtedness outstanding
with an aggregate principal amount of $240.9 million and we
had $90 million of borrowing capacity under the revolving
portion of our secured revolving bank credit facility. We may
also incur additional indebtedness in the future. On
June 1, 2010, holders of our 3% convertible notes due 2025,
referred to as the 3% convertible notes, are
permitted to require us to repurchase the 3% convertible notes
for 100% of the principal amount outstanding ($57.5 million
as of January 2, 2010) plus accrued and unpaid
interest. Although we cannot provide any assurances, we
currently expect to have sufficient liquidity from our cash from
operating activities, our cash and cash equivalents
and/or our
secured revolving bank credit facility to fund any such required
repurchases. In the event of a default under the notes or the
secured revolving bank credit facility, our indebtedness could
become immediately due and payable and could adversely affect
our financial condition.
Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences on
us, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our debt level increases our vulnerability to general adverse
economic and industry conditions;
|
|
|
|
we may have difficulty obtaining financing in the future for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
purposes;
|
|
|
|
we may need to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from
operations to pay interest and principal on our debt, which
would reduce the amount of money available to finance our
operations and other business activities;
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
our debt level could limit our flexibility in planning for, or
reacting to, changes in our business and in our industry in
general; and
|
|
|
|
our substantial amount of debt and the amount we must pay to
service our debt obligations could place us at a competitive
disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt.
|
The
terms of our secured revolving bank credit facility impose
financial and operating restrictions on us.
We have a secured revolving bank credit facility with a
borrowing capacity of $90 million, which, subject to
certain conditions, may be increased to $150 million. Our
secured revolving bank credit facility contains restrictive
covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that
may be in our long-term best interests. These covenants limit or
restrict, among other things, our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or pre-pay existing indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions in respect of our
equity securities;
|
|
|
|
sell assets, including the capital stock of us and our
subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
enter into certain transactions with our affiliates;
|
|
|
|
transfer any capital stock of any subsidiary or permit any
subsidiary to issue capital stock;
|
|
|
|
create liens;
|
|
|
|
make certain loans or investments; and
|
|
|
|
effect a consolidation or merger or transfer of all or
substantially all of our assets.
|
These limitations and restrictions may adversely affect our
ability to finance our future operations or capital needs or
engage in other business activities that may be in our best
interests. In addition, our ability to borrow under the secured
revolving bank credit facility is subject to compliance with
covenants. If we breach any of the covenants in our secured
revolving bank credit facility, we may be in default under our
secured revolving bank credit facility. If we default, the
lenders under our secured revolving bank credit facility could
declare all borrowings owed to them, including accrued interest
and other fees, to be immediately due and payable.
We may
become obligated to make earnout payments to the former
stockholders and employees of RCI, which may limit our available
cash or affect our ability to engage in other business
activities that may be in our best interests.
In connection with the acquisition of RCI, the former
stockholders and employees of RCI will be eligible to receive an
earnout payable in cash and common stock for each of the 2010,
2011 and 2012 fiscal years with an aggregate value of up to
$170 million if certain financial performance targets are
achieved. This earnout may limit our cash available for other
purposes, limit our ability to engage in other business
activities that may be in our best interests, limit our ability
to make future acquisitions and may affect our ability to obtain
financing.
If we
fail to manage our exposure to global financial and securities
market risk successfully, our operating results and financial
condition could be materially impacted.
The primary objective of most of our investment activities is to
conservatively invest excess cash. To achieve this objective, a
majority of our cash and cash equivalents are held in bank
deposit accounts and institutional money market mutual funds. If
the carrying value of our investments exceeds the fair value,
and the decline in fair value is deemed to be
other-than-temporary,
we will be required to write down the value of our investments,
which could materially harm our results of operations and
financial condition. We maintain cash and cash equivalents in
various institutions at levels exceeding the insurance limits of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, and we
purchase investments not guaranteed by the FDIC. Accordingly, if
any of these institutions fail, there may be a risk that we will
not recover the full principal of our investments or that their
liquidity may be diminished. These investments are subject to
general credit, liquidity, market, and interest rate risks,
which may be directly or
13
indirectly impacted by uncertainty about current economic
conditions. We could incur significant realized, unrealized or
impairment losses associated with these investments.
Our
growth and success depend, in part, on our ability to add new
clients and maintain and expand our relationships with existing
clients.
Key elements of our growth strategy include adding new clients,
extending the term of existing client agreements and growing the
business of our existing clients. Competition for clients is
intense, and we may not be able to add new clients or keep
existing clients on favorable terms, or at all. If we are unable
to add and launch new clients within the time frames projected
by us, we may not be able to achieve our targeted results in the
expected periods. A change in the management of our clients
could adversely affect our relationship with those clients,
including our ability to renew agreements with those clients or
enter into amendments to those agreements on favorable terms. If
any of our existing clients were to exit the
e-commerce
channel, declare bankruptcy or suffer other financial
difficulties
and/or
terminate or modify their relationships with us, our business,
results of operations and financial condition could be adversely
affected. If our agreements with existing clients terminate or
are terminated, we may be unable to renew or replace these
agreements on comparable terms, or at all.
Our
success is tied to the offline businesses of our
clients.
Our success is substantially dependent upon the offline
businesses of our clients. Our business and reputation could be
adversely affected if any of our clients were to suffer
impairment of their offline businesses, whether due to financial
difficulties, impairment of their brands, reduction in marketing
efforts or reduction in the number of their retail stores. If
any of these occurred, consumer traffic and sales through our
clients Web sites could be negatively affected and clients
could choose not to continue to utilize our
e-commerce,
interactive marketing or liquidation services. Our results of
operations could also be negatively impacted if certain of our
clients fail to forecast product demand. Under certain of our
client agreements, the clients select and buy the inventory for
their corresponding Web stores. Under such arrangements, the
client establishes product prices and pays us service fees based
either on a fixed or variable percentage of revenues, or on the
activity performed. As a result, if any of these clients fail to
forecast product demand or optimize or maintain access to
inventory, our service fees could be adversely affected.
A
large percentage of our revenue is derived from a small number
of our clients businesses.
For fiscal 2009, sales to customers through one of our
clients businesses accounted for 11.1% of our revenue, and
sales through another clients businesses accounted for
10.2% of our revenue. In fiscal 2009, sales through our top five
clients businesses accounted for 36.9% of our revenues.
For fiscal 2008 and 2007, sales through our top five
clients businesses accounted for 38.0% and 45.3% of our
revenue, respectively. Loss of any of our major clients could
adversely affect our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
We are
subject to significant inventory risks.
We are exposed to significant inventory risks that may adversely
affect our operating results. These inventory risks are a result
of seasonality, changes in consumer tastes, changes in consumer
demand and spending habits, and other factors. In order to be
successful, we and our clients must accurately predict consumer
demand and avoid overstocking or understocking products. If we
or our clients fail to identify and respond to changes in
merchandising and consumer preferences, sales on our or our
clients
e-commerce
businesses could suffer and we or our clients could be required
to mark down unsold inventory. For the inventory we own, this
would depress our profit margins. For the inventory owned by our
clients, this would reduce the fees we are able to collect, as
our fees are calculated as a percentage of sales. In addition,
any failure to keep pace with changes in consumers tastes
could result in lost opportunities and reduced sales through our
or our clients
e-commerce
businesses.
Inventory loss and theft, or shrinkage, and
merchandise returns could also increase in the future. If
merchandise returns are significant, or our shrinkage rate
increases, our revenues and costs of operations could be
adversely affected.
14
Our
business could suffer if we are unsuccessful in making,
integrating, and maintaining commercial agreements and other
business relationships.
Relationships
with Manufacturers, Retailers and Other Suppliers.
For some of our clients
e-commerce
businesses, we own inventory and primarily purchase products
from the manufacturers and distributors of the products. For
other of our clients
e-commerce
businesses, our clients own inventory and typically purchase
products from the manufacturers and distributors of products or
source their own products. If we or our clients are unable to
develop and maintain relationships with these manufacturers,
distributors or sources, we or our clients may be unable to
obtain or continue to carry a sufficient assortment and quantity
of quality merchandise on acceptable commercial terms and our
and our clients
e-commerce
businesses could be adversely impacted. During fiscal 2009 we
purchased 18.2% of the total amount of
e-commerce
services inventory we purchased from one manufacturer. During
fiscal 2008 and 2007, we purchased 16.8% and 18.0%,
respectively, of the total amount of
e-commerce
services inventory we purchased from one manufacturer. While we
have a contract with this manufacturer, this manufacturer and
other manufacturers, some of which do not have contracts with
us, could stop selling products to us or our clients and may ask
us or our clients to remove their products or logos from our or
our clients Web stores. If we or our clients are unable to
obtain products directly from manufacturers, retailers or other
suppliers, especially popular brand merchandise, we or our
clients may not be able to obtain the same or comparable
merchandise in a timely manner or on acceptable commercial
terms. In addition, retailers and other suppliers may not
continue to sell their excess inventory to us on current terms
or at all. For example, our suppliers may sell their excess
inventory to other traditional or online merchandise liquidators
or they may not have excess inventory to sell. Our failure to
obtain excess inventory on current terms or at all may limit our
growth.
Marketing
and Promotional Arrangements.
We have relationships with search engines, comparison shopping
sites, affiliate marketers and other Web sites to provide
content, advertising banners and other links to our
clients
e-commerce
businesses. We rely on these relationships as significant
sources of traffic to our clients
e-commerce
businesses. If we are unable to maintain these relationships or
enter into new relationships on acceptable terms, our ability to
attract new customers could be harmed.
Shipping
Vendors.
Although we operate our own fulfillment centers, we rely upon
multiple third parties for the shipment of our products. We also
rely upon certain vendors to ship products directly to
consumers. As a result, we are subject to the risks associated
with the ability of these vendors and other third parties to
successfully and in a timely manner fulfill and ship customer
orders and any price increases instituted by these vendors. The
failure of these vendors and other third parties to provide
these services, or the termination or interruption of these
services, could adversely affect the satisfaction of consumers,
which could result in reduced sales by our and our clients
e-commerce
businesses. In addition, if third parties were to increase the
prices they charge to ship our products, and we passed these
increases on to consumers, consumers might choose to buy
comparable products locally to avoid shipping charges.
Our
revenue from our affiliate marketing network may fail to grow or
may decline if the reputation of the affiliate marketing network
is damaged by unscrupulous activities of network
participants.
The goal of an affiliate marketing network is to facilitate
long-term and mutually beneficial partnerships between
publishers/affiliates and advertisers/merchants. Our affiliate
network may not continue to be effective in the future due to,
among other reasons, publishers/affiliates acting in an
unscrupulous manner, including using spam, false advertising,
adware, cookie stuffing, forced clicks and other similar methods
to drive traffic to advertisers on the network. If
publishers/affiliates in the affiliate network utilize unethical
practices, this could adversely affect the reputation of the
affiliate network and we may experience difficulty in attracting
advertisers/merchants to the affiliate network and our revenues
could fail to grow or could decline.
15
A
disruption in our operations could materially and adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Any disruption to our operations, including system, network,
telecommunications, software or hardware failures, and any
damage to our physical locations or off-site data centers, could
materially and adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Our operations are subject to the risk of damage or interruption
from:
|
|
|
|
|
fire, flood, hurricane, tornado, earthquake or other natural
disasters;
|
|
|
|
power losses and interruptions;
|
|
|
|
Internet, telecommunications or data network failures;
|
|
|
|
physical and electronic break-ins or security breaches;
|
|
|
|
computer viruses;
|
|
|
|
acts of terrorism; and
|
|
|
|
other similar events.
|
If any of these events occur, it could result in interruptions,
delays or cessations in service to customers of our and our
clients
e-commerce
businesses and adversely impact our and our clients
e-commerce
businesses. These events could also prevent us from fulfilling
orders for our and our clients
e-commerce
businesses. Our clients might seek significant compensation from
us for their losses. Even if unsuccessful, this type of claim
likely would be time consuming and costly for us to address and
damaging to our reputation.
Any system failure that causes an interruption of the
availability of our or our clients
e-commerce
businesses could reduce the attractiveness of our or our
clients
e-commerce
businesses to consumers and result in reduced revenues, which
could materially and adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Problems
in our fulfillment operations could adversely affect our
business.
Under some of our client agreements, we maintain the inventory
of our clients in our fulfillment centers. We also maintain our
own inventory in our fulfillment centers. Our failure to
properly handle and protect such inventory could adversely
affect our relationship with our clients or our business. In
addition, because it is difficult to predict demand, we may not
manage our fulfillment centers in an optimal way, which may
result in excess or insufficient inventory or warehousing,
fulfillment and distribution capacity. We may be unable to
adequately staff our fulfillment centers. As we continue to add
fulfillment and warehouse capability or add new clients with
different fulfillment requirements, our fulfillment network
becomes increasingly complex and operating it becomes more
challenging. If we are unable to adapt to these changes, our
business could be adversely affected.
Our
success is tied to the adequacy of the Internet
infrastructure.
The success of our businesses and our clients
e-commerce
businesses depends on the continued development and maintenance
of the Internet infrastructure. As currently configured, the
Internet may not support changes in technology or continued
increases in the number or requirements of users, or there may
be delays in the development of necessary modifications to the
Internet infrastructure, either of which could result in
Internet outages and delays. In addition, problems caused by
viruses, worms, malware and similar
programs may harm the performance of the Internet. The amount of
traffic on our and our clients
e-commerce
businesses could decline materially if there are Internet
outages or delays in the future.
We are
dependent upon consumers willingness to use the Internet
to purchase goods.
Our long-term future depends heavily upon the general
publics willingness to use the Internet as a means to
purchase goods. Consumers may be unwilling to use the Internet
to purchase goods for a number of reasons, including lack of
access to high-speed communications equipment, congestion of
traffic on the Internet, Internet outages or delays, possible
disruptions or other damage to users computers, increases
in the cost of accessing the
16
Internet and security and privacy risks or the perception of
such risks. If, for example, consumer confidence in the security
of
e-commerce
businesses is undermined, consumers may cease doing business
through the Internet, including through our and our
clients
e-commerce
businesses, which would adversely affect our business, results
of operations and financial condition. See We may be
liable if third parties misappropriate our customers
personal information and Credit card and payment
fraud could adversely affect our business.
We may
be liable if third parties misappropriate our customers
personal information.
Although we have developed systems and processes that are
designed to protect consumer information and prevent security
breaches, we cannot assure you that our security measures will
prevent security breaches. A compromise of our security systems
that results in customers personal information being
obtained by an unauthorized person could adversely affect
customers willingness to utilize our and our clients
e-commerce
businesses, our reputation, operations, results of operations,
financial condition and liquidity, and could result in
litigation against us and fines imposed on us. Additionally, any
security breach could require that we expend significant
resources to strengthen the security of our information systems
and result in a disruption of our online operations.
If we
do not respond to rapid technological changes, our services and
proprietary technology and systems may become
obsolete.
The Internet and
e-commerce
industries are characterized by rapid technological change. To
remain competitive, we must continue to develop new services and
technologies and respond to technological advances and emerging
industry standards and practices on a cost-effective and timely
basis. For example, the number of individuals who access the
Internet through devices other than a personal computer, such as
mobile telephones, personal digital assistants, smart phones,
hand held computers, televisions and set-top box devices, has
increased dramatically and is likely to increase in the future.
As a result, we must continue to adapt our existing technologies
for use with these alternative devices. Due to the costs and
management time required to introduce new services and
enhancements, we may be unable to respond to rapid technological
changes in a timely enough manner to avoid our services becoming
uncompetitive. Our failure to respond to technological changes
could substantially harm our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Our
business is heavily dependent on the use of
e-mail, and
any decrease in the use of
e-mail may
harm our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We rely on
e-mail
marketing to drive consumer traffic to our and our clients
e-commerce
businesses. In our
e-mail
marketing solutions business, we derive revenue from selling our
e-mail
marketing solutions.
E-mail could
become a less effective means of communicating with and
marketing to consumers for a variety of reasons, including:
|
|
|
|
|
problems with technology that make our
e-mail
communications more difficult for us to deliver and for
consumers to read, such as the ability of smart phones or
similar communications devices to adequately display our
e-mail;
|
|
|
|
consumers may disregard marketing
e-mails due
to the large volume of such
e-mails they
receive;
|
|
|
|
the inability of filters to effectively screen for unwanted
e-mails,
resulting in increased levels of junk mail, or spam,
which may overwhelm consumers
e-mail
accounts;
|
|
|
|
increased use of social networking sites may result in decreased
use of
e-mail as a
primary means of communication;
|
|
|
|
growth in the number of
e-mails sent
or received on a daily or regular basis;
|
|
|
|
continued security concerns regarding Internet usage in general
from viruses, worms or similar problems; and
|
|
|
|
increased governmental regulation or restrictive policies
adopted by Internet service providers, or ISPs, that
make it more difficult or costly to utilize
e-mail for
marketing communications.
|
17
Our ability to contact customers through
e-mail could
also be harmed and our business may be adversely affected if we
mistakenly end up on SPAM lists, or lists of entities that have
been involved in sending unwanted, unsolicited
e-mails. If
any of these were to occur, the traffic to our and our
clients
e-commerce
businesses and the demand for our
e-mail
marketing solutions may decrease, which could adversely affect
our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We
and/or our clients may be unable to protect our and their
proprietary technology and intellectual property
rights.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the protection
of our and our clients intellectual property rights. We
may be unable to deter infringement or misappropriation of our
software and other proprietary information and material, detect
unauthorized use or take appropriate steps to enforce our
intellectual property rights. Additionally, the laws of some
foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the
same extent as do the laws of the United States. The steps we
have taken to protect our proprietary rights may be inadequate
and third parties may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary
rights. Any significant failure on our part to protect our
intellectual property could make it easier for our competitors
to offer similar services and thereby adversely affect our
market opportunities. In addition, litigation may be necessary
in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights.
Litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of
management and technical resources. The failure of our clients
to protect their intellectual property rights, including their
trademarks and domain names, could also impair our operations.
We
have been, and may in the future be subject to intellectual
property claims or competition or trade practices claims that
could be costly and could disrupt our business.
Third parties may assert that our business or technologies
infringe or misappropriate their intellectual property rights,
or that we are engaging in unfair competition or other illegal
trade practices. We have been sued for infringing other
parties patents and have been notified of other potential
patent disputes. We could increasingly be subject to patent
infringement claims as our services expand in scope and
complexity. Patent infringement and other intellectual property
claims, whether meritorious or not, are time consuming and
costly to resolve, and could require expensive changes in our
methods of doing business, could require us to enter into costly
royalty or licensing agreements, or could require us to cease
conducting certain operations. We may be unsuccessful in
defending against these claims, which could result in
substantial damages, fines or other penalties. Even unsuccessful
claims could result in significant legal fees and other
expenses, diversion of managements time and disruptions in
our business. Any of these claims could also harm our reputation.
We may
be subject to product liability claims that could be costly and
time-consuming.
We sell products sourced by us and products manufactured by
third parties, some of which may be defective. If any product
that we sell were to cause physical injury or injury to
property, the injured party or parties could bring claims
against us. We could also be subject to claims that customers of
our or our clients
e-commerce
businesses were harmed due to their reliance on our product
information, product selection guides, advice or instructions.
If a successful claim were brought against us in excess of our
insurance coverage, it could adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition. Even unsuccessful
claims could result in the expenditure of funds and management
time and adverse publicity and could have a negative impact on
our business.
Credit
card and payment fraud could adversely affect our
business.
The failure to adequately control fraudulent transactions could
increase our expenses and undermine consumer confidence in
e-commerce
in general and our
e-commerce
offerings in particular. To date, we have not suffered material
losses due to fraud. However, we may in the future suffer losses
as a result of orders placed with fraudulent credit card data.
Under current credit card practices, we are liable for
fraudulent credit card transactions because we do not obtain a
cardholders signature. See also We are dependent
upon consumers willingness to use the Internet to purchase
goods.
18
If one
or more states successfully assert that we should collect or
should have collected sales or other taxes on the sale of our
merchandise, our business could be harmed.
The application of sales tax or other similar taxes to
interstate and international sales over the Internet is complex
and evolving. We currently collect sales or other similar taxes
only for goods sold by us and shipped into certain states. One
or more local, state or foreign jurisdictions may seek to impose
past and future sales tax obligations on us or our clients and
other
out-of-state
companies that engage in
e-commerce.
If one or more states or any foreign country successfully
asserts that we should collect sales or other taxes on the sale
of merchandise through the
e-commerce
businesses we operate, it could result in substantial tax
liability for past sales, decrease future sales and otherwise
harm our business.
We may
have exposure to greater than anticipated tax
liabilities.
We are subject to income, payroll and other taxes in both the
United States and foreign jurisdictions. In the ordinary course
of our business, there are many transactions and calculations
where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Moreover,
significant judgment is required in evaluating our worldwide
provision for income taxes. Our determination of our tax
liability is always subject to review by applicable tax
authorities. Any adverse outcome of such a review could have a
negative effect on our operating results and financial
condition. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, the
ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our
financial statements and may materially affect our financial
results in the period or periods for which such determination is
made.
Our
ability to use net operating loss carryforwards to reduce future
tax payments may be limited.
As of January 2, 2010, we had approximately
$507.3 million of U.S. Federal net operating loss
carryforwards, referred to as NOLs, available to
reduce taxable income in future years.
Utilization of the NOLs may be subject to a substantial annual
limitation due to ownership change limitations that may have
occurred or that could occur in the future, as required by
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, referred to as the Code. These ownership
changes may limit the amount of NOLs that can be utilized
annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively.
In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382
of the Code results from a transaction or series of transactions
over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of
more than 50 percentage points of the outstanding stock of
a company by certain stockholders or public groups. The issuance
of securities in connection with our acquisition of RCI and the
disposition of our stock by certain selling stockholders,
including the selling stockholder named in this prospectus
supplement, may have resulted in an ownership change, or could
result in an ownership change in the future upon subsequent
dispositions of our stock. In the event of an ownership change,
Section 382 imposes an annual limitation on the amount of
post-ownership change taxable income a corporation may offset
with pre-ownership change NOLs. The limitation imposed by
Section 382 for any post-change year would be determined by
multiplying the value of our stock immediately before the
ownership change (subject to certain adjustments) by the
applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual
limitation may be carried over to later years, and the
limitation may under certain circumstances be increased by
built-in gains which may be present with respect to assets held
by us at the time of the ownership change that are recognized in
the five-year period after the ownership change. Our use of NOLs
arising after the date of an ownership change would not be
affected.
In addition, the ability to use NOLs will be dependent on our
ability to generate taxable income. The NOLs may expire before
we generate sufficient taxable income. There were no NOLs that
expired in the fiscal years ended December 29, 2007 and
January 3, 2009. The maximum NOLs that could expire if not
utilized for the year ended January 2, 2010 is
approximately $2.0 million.
We
rely on insurance to mitigate some risks facing our business,
and to the extent our insurance does not mitigate the risks
facing our business or our insurers are unable to meet their
obligations, our operating results may be negatively
impacted.
We contract for insurance to cover certain potential risks and
liabilities. It is possible that we may not be able to get
enough insurance to meet our needs, may have to pay very high
prices for the coverage we do get, have very high
19
deductibles or may not be able to, or may choose not to, acquire
any insurance for certain types of business risk. This could
leave us exposed to potential claims. If we were found liable
for a significant claim in the future, our operating results
could be negatively impacted. Also, to the extent the cost of
maintaining insurance increases, our operating results could be
negatively affected. Additionally, we are subject to the risk
that one or more of our insurers may become insolvent and would
be unable to pay a claim that may be made in the future. There
can be no assurance that our insurance will be adequate to
protect us from pending and future claims. In addition, we are
required to maintain insurance coverage under some of our
agreements with our clients. If we are not able to or do not
maintain the required insurance coverage, we could breach those
agreements.
Variability
in self-insurance liability estimates could significantly impact
our financial results.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we began to self-insure
for employee medical coverage up to a set retention level,
beyond which we maintain excess insurance coverage. We may
decide to self-insure for other risks for which we currently
purchase insurance. Liabilities are determined using actuarial
estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred and an
estimate of incurred but not reported claims, on an undiscounted
basis. Our accruals for insurance reserves reflect certain
actuarial assumptions and management judgments, which are
subject to a high degree of variability. The variability is
caused by factors external to us such as:
|
|
|
|
|
historical claims experience;
|
|
|
|
medical inflation;
|
|
|
|
legislative changes to benefit levels;
|
|
|
|
jury verdicts; and
|
|
|
|
claim settlement patterns.
|
Any significant variation in these factors could cause a
material change to our reserves for self-insurance liabilities
as well as earnings. Our results could be materially impacted by
claims and other expenses related to our self-insured plans if
future occurrences and claims differ from our assumptions and
historical trends.
Existing
or future laws or regulations could harm our business or
marketing efforts.
We are subject to international, federal, state and local laws
applicable to businesses in general and to
e-commerce
specifically. Existing and proposed laws and regulations
covering issues such as taxation, pricing, content,
distribution, access, quality and delivery of products and
services, electronic contracts, intellectual property rights,
user privacy and information security may impede the growth of
the Internet or
e-commerce.
Our international operations are also subject to import and
export requirements, U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act, and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to
governmental officials. It is not clear how some existing laws
apply to the Internet and
e-commerce,
and some laws that are specific to the Internet and
e-commerce,
such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and The Controlling
the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of
2003, or the CAN-SPAM Act, are only beginning to be
interpreted by the courts and their applicability and reach are
therefore uncertain. Unfavorable regulations and laws, or
interpretations thereof, could diminish the demand for our
services, limit the services we can provide, increase our cost
of doing business and subject us to penalties.
In addition, we utilize behavioral marketing
(generally, the tracking of a users online activities to
deliver advertising tailored to his or her interests) in order
to drive consumer traffic to our Web sites. The Federal Trade
Commission, or FTC, has released a Staff Report with principles
to address consumer privacy issues that may arise from
behavioral marketing and to encourage industry self-regulation.
In the future, it is expected that the FTC or Congress could
take further action to limit or further restrict the use of
behavioral marketing, and those actions could have an adverse
affect on our marketing efforts.
20
Existing
federal, state and international laws regulating
e-mail
marketing practices impose certain obligations on the senders of
commercial
e-mails and
could expose us to liability for violations, decrease the
effectiveness of our
e-mail
marketing solutions, and expose us to financial, criminal and
other penalties for non-compliance, which could increase our
operating costs.
The CAN-SPAM Act establishes certain requirements for commercial
e-mail
messages and specifies penalties for commercial
e-mail that
violates the CAN-SPAM Act. The CAN-SPAM Act, among other things,
obligates the sender of commercial
e-mails to
provide recipients with the ability to opt out of receiving
future commercial
e-mail
messages from the sender. As a result, in the event our products
and services were to become unavailable or malfunction for any
period of time for any reason, it is possible that certain
opt-out requests would not be received, or other compliance
obligations would be impeded, potentially exposing our clients
and us to liability under the CAN-SPAM Act. Non-compliance with
the CAN-SPAM Act may carry significant financial penalties.
Moreover, penalties under the CAN-SPAM Act may increase if it is
determined that
e-mail lists
provided to us by our clients were obtained using unlawful
means. We generally cannot confirm the origins of
e-mail lists
provided to us by our clients. The CAN-SPAM Act preempts similar
state laws directed at commercial
e-mail in
many instances, but there are some exceptions and liability in
connection with
e-mail
marketing campaigns can arise under state law as well. In
addition, many states have more general laws that may apply to
commercial
e-mail
practices. These laws often provide a private right of action
and specify damages and other penalties, which in some cases may
be more substantial than the penalties provided under the
CAN-SPAM Act. In addition, certain foreign countries have
enacted laws that regulate
e-mail
marketing, and some of these laws are more restrictive than
U.S. laws. For example, some foreign laws prohibit sending
unsolicited
e-mail
unless the recipient has provided the sender advance consent to
receipt of such
e-mail, or
in other words has opted-in to receiving it. If we
were found to be in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act, applicable
state laws not preempted by the CAN-SPAM Act, or foreign laws
regulating the distribution of
e-mail,
whether as a result of violations by our clients or if we were
deemed to be directly subject to and in violation of these
requirements, we could be exposed to one or more of the
following consequences:
|
|
|
|
|
payment of statutory, actual or other damages;
|
|
|
|
criminal penalties;
|
|
|
|
actions by state attorneys general;
|
|
|
|
actions by private citizens or class actions; and
|
|
|
|
penalties imposed by regulatory authorities of the
U.S. government, state governments and foreign governments.
|
Any of these potential areas of exposure would adversely affect
our financial performance, could preclude us from doing business
in specific jurisdictions, and significantly harm our business.
We also may be required to change one or more aspects of the way
we operate our business, which could impair our ability to
attract and retain clients or increase our operating costs.
Loss
of our credit card acceptance privileges or changes to credit
card association fees, rules, or practices could harm our
business.
Payment by consumers for purchases through our and our
clients
e-commerce
businesses is typically made by credit card or similar payment
method. We must rely on banks or payment processors to process
these transactions and must pay a fee for this service. From
time to time, credit card associations may increase the
interchange fees that they charge for each transaction using one
of their cards. Our credit card processors have the right to
pass any increases in interchange fees on to us as well as
increase their own fees for processing. These increased fees
would increase our operating costs and reduce our profit
margins. We are also required by our processors to comply with
credit card association operating rules, and we will reimburse
our processors for any fines they are assessed by credit card
associations as a result of any rule violations by us. The
credit card associations and their member banks set and
interpret operating rules related to their credit cards. The
credit card associations
and/or
member banks could adopt new operating rules or re-interpret
existing rules that we might find difficult or even impossible
to follow. As a
21
result, we could lose our ability to give customers the option
of using credit cards to make their payments, which would
seriously damage our business.
Future
changes in financial accounting standards or practices or
taxation rules or practices may adversely affect our reported
financial results.
A change in accounting standards or practices or a change in
existing taxation rules or practices could have a significant
effect on our reported results and may even require retroactive
or retrospective application. Changes to existing rules or the
questioning of current practices may cause adverse unexpected
revenue
and/or
expense fluctuations and could adversely affect our reported
financial results or the way we conduct our business.
Our
success is dependent upon our executive officers and other key
personnel.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the
contribution of our executive officers and other key personnel,
particularly Michael G. Rubin, chairman of the board, president
and chief executive officer. Our executive officers and key
personnel could terminate their employment with us at any time
despite any employment agreements we may have with these
employees. Due to the competition for highly qualified
personnel, we cannot be sure that we will be able to retain or
attract executive, managerial or other key personnel. In
addition, key personnel of an acquired company may decide not to
work for us. We do not intend to obtain key person life
insurance for any of our executive officers or key personnel.
The loss of any of our key personnel could harm our business if
we are unable to effectively replace that person, if we incur
significant operating expenses and direct management time to
search for a replacement, or if that person should join one of
our competitors or otherwise compete with us.
We may
be unable to hire and retain skilled personnel which could limit
our growth.
Our future success depends on our ability to continue to
identify, attract, retain and motivate skilled personnel. Due to
intense competition for these individuals from our competitors
and other employers, we may not be able to attract or retain
highly qualified personnel in the future. Our failure to attract
and retain the experienced and highly trained personnel that are
integral to our business may limit our growth. Additionally, we
have experienced recent growth in personnel numbers and expect
to continue to hire additional personnel in selected areas.
Managing this growth requires significant time and resource
commitments from our senior management. If we are unable to
effectively manage a large and geographically dispersed group of
employees or to anticipate our future growth and personnel
needs, we may not be able to retain skilled personnel and our
business may be adversely affected.
There
are limitations on the liabilities of our directors and
executive officers. Under certain circumstances, we are
obligated to indemnify our directors and executive officers
against liability and expenses incurred by them in their service
to us.
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and under Delaware law, our directors are not
liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty, except for liability for breach of a
directors duty of loyalty, acts or omissions by a director
not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a
knowing violation of law, dividend payments or stock repurchases
that are unlawful under Delaware law or any transaction in which
a director has derived an improper personal benefit. In
addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with
each of our directors and executive officers. These agreements,
among other things, require us to indemnify each director and
executive officer for certain expenses, including
attorneys fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts,
incurred by any such person in any action or proceeding,
including any action by us or in our right, arising out of the
persons services as one of our directors or executive
officers. The costs associated with providing indemnification
under these agreements could be harmful to our business.
If we
fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we
may not be able to accurately report our financial results or
prevent fraud.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires our
management to report on the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting. We have expended significant
resources to comply with our obligations under Section 404.
If we fail to correct any issues in the design or operating
effectiveness of our internal controls
22
over financial reporting or fail to prevent fraud, current and
potential stockholders and clients could lose confidence in our
financial reporting, which could harm our business, the trading
price of our common stock and our ability to retain our current
clients and obtain new clients.
The
price of our common stock may fluctuate
significantly.
Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile. During
fiscal 2009 and 2008, the high and low sales prices of our
common stock ranged from $26.00 to $5.69 per share. We expect
that the market price of our common stock may continue to
fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are
beyond our control. These factors include, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
our performance and prospects;
|
|
|
|
the performance and prospects of our clients;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
the timing and announcement of acquisitions by us or our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
the use of a significant portion of our available cash, issuance
of equity securities, incurrence of debt or expenses, assumption
of liabilities and incurrence of accounting write-offs in
connection with acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
government regulatory action;
|
|
|
|
changes in our publicly available guidance of future results of
operations;
|
|
|
|
the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock;
|
|
|
|
the vesting of our equity awards resulting in the sale of large
amounts of our common stock during concentrated trading windows;
|
|
|
|
adverse or unfavorable publicity about us, our services, or our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
investor perception of us and the industries in which we operate;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or buy/sell recommendations by
analysts;
|
|
|
|
the commencement of material litigation, or an unfavorable
judgment, against us;
|
|
|
|
announcements of restatements of prior period financial results;
|
|
|
|
terrorist attacks, war and threats of attacks and war;
|
|
|
|
additions or departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
sales of common stock; and
|
|
|
|
general financial, economic and other market conditions.
|
In addition, the stock market in general, and the market prices
for Internet-related companies in particular, have experienced
volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating
performance of such companies. These broad market and industry
fluctuations may adversely affect the price of our stock,
regardless of our operating performance.
Future
sales of our common stock in the public market or the issuance
of our common stock or securities senior to our common stock
could adversely affect the trading price of our common
stock.
We may issue common stock or equity securities senior to our
common stock in the future for a number of reasons, including to
attract and retain key personnel, to finance our operations and
growth strategy, to adjust our ratio of debt to equity, to
satisfy outstanding obligations or for other reasons. If we
issue securities, our existing stockholders may experience
dilution or the new securities may have rights senior to those
of our common stock. In addition, the terms of these securities
could impose restrictions on our operations. Future sales of our
common stock, the perception that such sales could occur or the
availability for future sale of shares of our common stock or
23
securities convertible into or exercisable for our common stock
could adversely affect the market prices of our common stock
prevailing from time to time.
As of February 10, 2010, we had:
|
|
|
|
|
1,504,070 shares available for new awards under our 2005
plan;
|
|
|
|
4,249,884 shares of common stock that were subject to
awards granted under the 2005 plan (including 226,081 restricted
stock awards which are issued and outstanding and subject to
forfeiture under certain conditions);
|
|
|
|
3,104,992 shares of common stock that were subject to
awards granted under our 1996 plan (in the event of the
cancellation, expiration, forfeiture or repurchase of any of
these shares, such shares would become available for issuance
under the 2005 plan); and
|
|
|
|
outstanding notes convertible into a maximum of
10,031,156 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment.
|
In addition, in connection with our acquisition of RCI, we could
issue shares of common stock with an aggregate value of up to
approximately $44.1 million, valued at the time of
issuance, to RCI employees in connection with the earnout
provisions of the merger agreement. No prediction can be made as
to the effect, if any, that the sale, or the availability for
sale, of substantial amounts of common stock could have on the
market price of our common stock.
We
have never paid dividends on our common stock and do not
anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable
future.
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not
anticipate that any cash dividends will be declared or paid in
the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our secured
revolving bank credit facility prohibit us from declaring or
paying dividends on our common stock. As a result, holders of
our common stock will not receive a return, if any, on their
investment unless they sell their shares of our common stock.
It may
be difficult for a third party to acquire us and this could
depress our stock price.
Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, bylaws, stockholder rights agreement and Delaware
law may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing
transactions that involve any actual or threatened change in
control. The rights issued under our stockholder rights
agreement may be a substantial deterrent to a person acquiring
beneficial ownership of 20% or more of our common stock without
the approval of our board of directors. The stockholder rights
agreement would cause extreme dilution to such person.
In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law which, subject to certain exceptions,
restricts certain transactions and business combinations between
a corporation and a stockholder owning 15% or more of the
corporations outstanding voting stock for a period of
three years from the date the stockholder becomes a 15%
stockholder. In addition to discouraging a third party from
seeking to acquire control of us, the foregoing provisions could
impair the ability of existing stockholders to remove and
replace our management
and/or our
board of directors.
Because many investors consider a change of control a desirable
path to liquidity, delaying or preventing a change in control of
our company may reduce the number of investors interested in our
common stock, which could depress our stock price.
Holders
of our common stock will be subordinated to our secured
revolving bank credit facility, convertible notes and other
indebtedness.
In the event of our liquidation or insolvency, holders of common
stock would receive a distribution only after payment in full of
all principal and interest due (i) under our secured
revolving bank credit facility, (ii) to holders of our
convertible notes and (iii) to other creditors. After these
payments are made, there may be little or no proceeds to
distribute to holders of our common stock.
24
|
|
ITEM 1B:
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS.
|
We, like other issuers, from time to time receive written
comments from the staff of the SEC regarding our periodic or
current reports under the Exchange Act. There are no comments
that remain unresolved that we received not less than
180 days before the end of fiscal 2009.
The following table provides information about our owned, leased
and licensed facilities as of March 1, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use
|
|
Footage
|
|
|
Locations
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Office
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
King of Prussia, PA
|
|
|
|
|
Offices
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
Los Angeles, CA;
|
|
|
e-Commerce services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacoima, CA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Jose, CA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
King of Prussia, PA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roanoke, VA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barcelona, Spain; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chadderton, United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
Offices
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
Campbell, CA;
|
|
|
Interactive Marketing services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burlington, MA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lexington, MA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
King of Prussia, PA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilkes-Barre, PA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bellevue, WA; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
London, England
|
|
|
|
|
Offices
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Boston, MA; and
|
|
|
Consumer Engagement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY
|
|
|
|
|
Fulfillment Centers
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
Pacoima, CA;
|
|
|
e-Commerce services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisville, KY;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richwood, KY;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shepherdsville, KY;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martinsville, VA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chadderton, United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
Call Centers
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
Pacoima, CA;
|
|
|
e-Commerce services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melbourne, FL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brunswick, GA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eau Claire, WI; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chadderton, United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
We also lease additional space to fill short term needs on an as
needed basis. We believe that our properties are adequate for
our present needs and that suitable additional or replacement
space will be available as required.
We own our principal executive office in King of Prussia, PA,
which was subject to a $12.1 million mortgage as of the end
of fiscal 2009. We also have an option through March 2012 to
purchase an additional building lot adjacent to our principal
executive office in King of Prussia, PA. We own another office
in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, a fulfillment center in
Louisville, KY, and a call center in Eau Claire, WI which are
not subject to a mortgage.
|
|
ITEM 3:
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS.
|
We are involved in various litigation incidental to our
business, including alleged contractual claims, claims relating
to infringement of intellectual property rights of third
parties, claims relating to the manner in which goods are sold
through our
e-commerce
platform and claims relating to our collection of sales taxes in
certain states. We currently collect sales taxes for goods owned
and sold by us and shipped into certain states. As a result, we
are subject from time to time to claims from other states
alleging that we failed to collect and remit sales taxes for
sales and shipments of products to customers in those states.
25
Based on the merits of the cases
and/or the
amounts claimed, we do not believe that any claims are likely to
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
position or results of operations. We may, however, incur
substantial expenses and devote substantial time to defend these
claims whether or not such claims are meritorious. In addition,
litigation is inherently unpredictable. In the event of a
determination adverse to us, we may incur substantial monetary
liability and may be required to implement expensive changes in
our business practices, enter into costly royalty or licensing
agreements, or begin to collect sales taxes in states in which
we previously did not. An adverse determination could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial position or
results of operations.
|
|
ITEM 4:
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of our stockholders during
the fiscal quarter ended January 2, 2010.
|
|
ITEM 4.1:
|
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
|
The following table sets forth information regarding each of our
executive officers who, with the exception of Mr. Rubin,
are not also directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age(1)
|
|
Title
|
|
Michael G. Rubin
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Michael R. Conn
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
Stephen J. Gold
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer and
Corporate Chief Technology Officer
|
J. Scott Hardy
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Business Management
|
Arthur H. Miller
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
Damon Mintzer
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Sales
|
Set forth below are brief descriptions of the business
experience for at least the past five years of our executive
officers, who, with the exception of Mr. Rubin, are not
also directors.
Michael G. Rubin has served as our chairman of the board
and chief executive officer since July 1995, as co-president
from May 2004 through October 2006 and president from July 1995
to May 2004 and since October 2006.
Michael R. Conn has served as our executive vice
president, finance and chief financial officer since
March 2007 and our senior vice president, finance and chief
financial officer from January 2006 through March 2007. He
served as our senior vice president of corporate development
from July 2004 until January 2006, senior vice president,
business development from June 2000 through July 2004 and senior
vice president of strategic development from February 1999
through June 2000.
Stephen J. Gold has served as our executive vice
president and chief information officer since February 2005 and
as our corporate chief technology officer since June 2009. From
November 2003 until February 2005, he served as corporate vice
president and divisional chief information officer of
Merck & Company, Inc., a pharmaceutical company. Prior
thereto, he held various positions with Medco Health Solutions,
Inc., a prescription benefits management company, from July 1993
to September 2003, when it was a subsidiary of Merck. Most
recently, he served as senior vice president and chief
information officer and senior vice president, electronic
commerce at Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
J. Scott Hardy has served as our executive vice
president, business management since May 2007. From
March 2004 to May 2007 Mr. Hardy was Vice President at
BearingPoint, Inc., a consulting and systems integration firm,
responsible for the Americas Consumer Markets Practice. From
February 2001 to March 2004 Mr. Hardy was a managing
director at BearingPoint, Inc., and before that was a partner at
KPMG LLC prior to the spin-off of BearingPoint from KPMG.
26
Arthur H. Miller has served as our executive vice
president and general counsel since September 1999. From January
1988 to September 1999, Mr. Miller was a partner at Blank
Rome LLP, a law firm based in Philadelphia, PA. Mr. Miller
joined Blank Rome in April 1983.
Damon Mintzer has served as our executive vice president,
sales since July 2004 and served as president and chief
operating officer of Global-QVC Solutions, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of ours, from June 2001 to November 2006.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5:
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
|
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per
share of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market under the symbol GSIC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.75
|
|
|
$
|
9.54
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
16.63
|
|
|
$
|
10.91
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
18.24
|
|
|
$
|
11.15
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
15.81
|
|
|
$
|
5.69
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.77
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
15.59
|
|
|
$
|
12.29
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
19.75
|
|
|
$
|
14.09
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.00
|
|
|
$
|
18.09
|
|
As of March 1, 2010, we had approximately 1,845
stockholders of record. The last reported sales price
per share for our common stock on March 1, 2010, as
reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, was $25.70.
We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our common
stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to fund
our growth and, therefore, do not anticipate declaring or paying
any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable
future. In addition, the terms of our secured revolving bank
credit facility prohibit us from declaring or paying dividends
on our common stock.
We made no repurchases of our common stock during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2009.
On April 6, 2009, in connection with the acquisition of
Silverlign Group, Inc. (Silverlign), the Company
issued an aggregate of 168,778 shares of common stock to
the two selling stockholders of Silverlign (the Silverlign
Shares).
Pursuant to the terms of a Consulting Agreement dated
April 22, 2009 between Arimor, LLC (Arimor) and
GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc., the Company agreed to issue to
Arimor shares of the Companys common stock as a fee for
consulting services provided by Arimor. As of the end of fiscal
2009, the Company issued an aggregate of 41,867 shares of
common stock to Arimor (Arimor Shares) pursuant to
such agreement.
On September 1, 2009, in connection with the acquisition of
substantially all of the assets of KBJ Holdings, LLC, (KBJ
Holdings) the Company issued an aggregate of 57,694 shares
of common stock to KBJ Holdings (the KBJ Holdings
Shares).
The issuances of the Silverlign Shares, the Arimor Shares and
the KBJ Holdings Shares were completed in accordance with
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in
offerings without any public offering or distribution. The
Arimor Shares and the KBJ Holdings Shares are restricted
securities and include appropriate restrictive legends.
27
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total
return for our common stock, the Morgan Stanley Internet Index
and the NASDAQ Composite, assuming an investment of $100 in each
on January 1, 2005, and the reinvestment of all dividends.
The data points used for the performance graph are listed below.
COMPARISON
OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among GSI Commerce, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite
Index And Morgan Stanley Internet Index
|
|
|
* |
|
$100 invested on 1/1/05 in stock or 12/31/04 in index, including
reinvestment of dividends.
Indexes calculated on month-end basis. |
Total
Return Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/2005
|
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|
|
12/30/2006
|
|
|
12/29/2007
|
|
|
1/3/2009
|
|
|
1/2/2010
|
GSI Commerce, Inc.
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
84.87
|
|
|
|
|
105.46
|
|
|
|
|
109.90
|
|
|
|
|
60.69
|
|
|
|
|
142.80
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
101.33
|
|
|
|
|
114.01
|
|
|
|
|
123.71
|
|
|
|
|
73.11
|
|
|
|
|
105.61
|
|
Morgan Stanley Internet
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
100.98
|
|
|
|
|
115.05
|
|
|
|
|
152.45
|
|
|
|
|
78.57
|
|
|
|
|
143.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Stock price performance shown in this Performance Graph
for our common stock is historical and not necessarily
indicative of future price performance. The information
contained in this Performance Graph is not soliciting
material and has not been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. This Performance Graph will
not be incorporated by reference into any of our future filings
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Information about securities authorized for issuance under our
equity compensation plan appears in Part III, Item 12
of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
28
|
|
ITEM 6:
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA.
|
The following tables present portions of our financial
statements and are not complete. You should read the following
selected consolidated financial data together with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes to our
financial statements, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and Risk Factors. The selected statement of
operations data for fiscal 2007, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 and
the balance sheet data as of the end of fiscal 2008 and fiscal
2009 are derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The selected statement of operations data for fiscal 2005 and
fiscal 2006 and the balance sheet data as of the end of fiscal
2005, fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007 are derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements that are not included in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 30,
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues from product sales
|
|
$
|
355,374
|
|
|
$
|
461,183
|
|
|
$
|
512,194
|
|
|
$
|
577,073
|
|
|
$
|
542,249
|
|
Service fee revenues
|
|
|
85,018
|
|
|
|
148,370
|
|
|
|
237,763
|
|
|
|
389,853
|
|
|
|
461,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
440,392
|
|
|
|
609,553
|
|
|
|
749,957
|
|
|
|
966,926
|
|
|
|
1,004,215
|
|
Total costs and expenses(1)
|
|
|
437,514
|
|
|
|
600,116
|
|
|
|
745,638
|
|
|
|
977,186
|
|
|
|
993,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
2,878
|
|
|
|
9,437
|
|
|
|
4,319
|
|
|
|
(10,260
|
)
|
|
|
10,266
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
|
8,165
|
|
|
|
20,296
|
|
|
|
18,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
6,521
|
|
|
|
(3,846
|
)
|
|
|
(30,556
|
)
|
|
|
(8,684
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(2)
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
(38,140
|
)
|
|
|
(2,887
|
)
|
|
|
(7,585
|
)
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
44,661
|
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
|
|
(22,971
|
)
|
|
|
(11,028
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,147
|
|
|
$
|
44,929
|
|
|
$
|
(959
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,971
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.98
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.99
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share(3)
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
331,922
|
|
|
$
|
457,456
|
|
|
$
|
670,104
|
|
|
$
|
716,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,848
|
|
Total long-tem liabilities(4)
|
|
|
53,235
|
|
|
|
60,083
|
|
|
|
185,364
|
|
|
|
201,398
|
|
|
|
227,073
|
|
Working capital(5)
|
|
|
109,804
|
|
|
|
125,172
|
|
|
|
165,822
|
|
|
|
40,938
|
|
|
|
21,789
|
|
Stockholders equity(5)(6)
|
|
|
136,538
|
|
|
|
235,778
|
|
|
|
280,900
|
|
|
|
274,496
|
|
|
|
476,340
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Beginning in fiscal 2006, we adopted new accounting standards
for recognizing stock-based compensation. We recognized
$24.8 million in fiscal 2009, $19.4 million in fiscal
2008, $9.0 million in fiscal 2007, $7.8 million in
fiscal 2006, and $3.8 million in fiscal 2005. |
29
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Included in fiscal 2006 was a $38.1 million non-cash income
tax benefit. For additional information, see Note 11,
Income Taxes, to our consolidated financial statements
included in Item 15, Exhibits and Financial Statement
Schedule, of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(3) |
|
For additional information on the diluted earnings (loss) per
share calculation, see Note 12, Loss Per Share, to
our consolidated financial statements included in Item 15,
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule, of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(4) |
|
In fiscal 2007, we completed a subordinated convertible notes
offering of $150 million. For additional information, see
Note 7, Long-Term Debt and Credit Facility, to our
consolidated financial statements included in Item 15,
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule, of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(5) |
|
In fiscal 2008, we acquired
e-Dialog,
Inc. for approximately $150 million in cash, including
acquisition costs. In fiscal 2009, we acquired Retail
Convergence, Inc. for (i) $186 million at closing
consisting of cash of $92 million and shares of our common
stock valued at $94 million, and (ii) the obligation
to make earnout payments of up to $170 million over a three
year period beginning with fiscal year 2010 depending on
RCIs achievement of certain financial performance targets.
For additional information, see Note 6,
Acquisitions, to our consolidated financial statements
included in Item 15, Exhibits and Financial Statement
Schedule, of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(6) |
|
In fiscal 2009, we received approximately $88 million of
net proceeds through the sale of 5.4 million shares of our
common stock. |
|
|
ITEM 7:
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
|
All
statements made in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking
statements, as defined under federal securities law. The words
look forward to, anticipate,
believe, estimate, expect,
intend, may, plan,
will, would, should,
could, guidance, potential,
opportunity, continue,
project, forecast,
confident, prospects,
schedule, designed, future
discussions, if and similar expressions
typically are used to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on the then-current
expectations, beliefs, assumptions, estimates and forecasts
about our business. These statements are not guarantees of
future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual
outcomes and results may differ materially from what is
expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
Factors which may affect our business, financial condition and
operating results include the effects of changes in the economy,
consumer spending, the financial markets and the industries in
which we and our clients operate, changes affecting the Internet
e-commerce
and marketing service, our ability to develop and maintain
relationships with clients and suppliers and the timing of our
establishment, extension or termination of our relationships
with clients, our ability to timely and successfully develop,
maintain and protect our technology, confidential and
proprietary information, and product and service offerings, our
ability to execute operationally to attract and retain qualified
personnel,, to successfully integrate our recent acquisitions,
and the performance of acquired businesses. More information
about potential factors that could affect us is described in
Item 1A of Part I, Risk Factors. We
expressly disclaim any intent or obligation to update these
forward-looking statements.
Executive
Overview
Fiscal 2009 Financial Results and Significant Events:
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues grew $37.3 million, or 4%, over fiscal 2008.
Service fee revenues grew 19% and net revenues from product
sales decreased 6%.
E-commerce
services segment net revenues decreased 2%, interactive
marketing services segment net revenues increased by 51% and we
had $26.3 million in revenues from our new segment,
consumer engagement.
|
|
|
|
Net loss was $11.0 million in the 2009, inclusive of a
provision for income taxes of $2.3 million, compared to a
net loss of $23.0 million in fiscal 2008, inclusive of an
income tax benefit of $7.6 million. Income from operations
improved to $10.3 million in fiscal 2009 compared to a loss
of $10.3 million in fiscal 2008.
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2009, we received approximately $88 million of
net proceeds through the sale of 5.4 million shares of
common stock. We plan to use the net proceeds for working
capital and general corporate purposes, including possible
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
In November 2009, we acquired Retail Convergence, Inc.
(RCI) for (i) $186 million at closing
consisting of cash of $92 million and shares of our common
stock valued at $94 million, and (ii) the obligation
to make earnout payments of up to $170 million over a three
year period beginning with fiscal year 2010 depending on
RCIs achievement of certain financial performance targets.
RCI operates RueLaLa.com, an operator of online private sales
and SmartBargains.com, an off-price
e-commerce
marketplace. We believe the acquisition will allow us to enter
the private sale and off-price
e-commerce
marketplace markets and broaden our
e-commerce
solution offerings.
|
2010 Outlook:
|
|
|
|
|
We expect an increase in net revenue, with the majority of the
increase deriving from RCI and additional increases deriving
from
e-commerce
services and interactive marketing services. We expect our
income from operations to increase from fiscal 2009. We expect
our capital expenditures to increase in fiscal 2010, and be
similar to our capital expenditures in fiscal 2008. The increase
in capital expenditures will come from investments in our
infrastructure and technology as well as the integration of RCI.
We believe will have a net loss in fiscal 2010.
|
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of Fiscal 2009 and 2008 (amounts in tables in
millions):
Net
Revenues
We derive our revenues from sales of products by us through our
clients
e-commerce
businesses as well as through the Web stores in our consumer
engagement segment. We derive our revenues from service fees
through the development and operation of our clients
e-commerce
businesses, and through service fees earned by us through our
provision of interactive marketing services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Net Revenues by Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues from product sales
|
|
$
|
577.1
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
$
|
542.2
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
$
|
(34.9
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
Service fee revenues
|
|
|
389.8
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
462.0
|
|
|
|
46
|
%
|
|
|
72.2
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
966.9
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,004.2
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues by Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-Commerce
services
|
|
$
|
900.0
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
$
|
879.6
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
|
$
|
(20.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Interactive marketing services
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
127.6
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
43.1
|
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Consumer engagement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Intersegment eliminations
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(29.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
966.9
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,004.2
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Revenues by Type
Net Revenues from Product Sales. Net revenues
from product sales are derived from the sale of products by us
through our clients
e-commerce
Web stores as well as through the Web stores in our consumer
engagement segment. Net revenues from product sales include
outbound shipping charges for all of our Web stores for which we
provide fulfillment services. Net revenues from product sales
are net of allowances for returns and discounts and exclude
sales tax. We recognize revenue from product sales and shipping
when title and risk of ownership passes to the consumer either
upon shipment of products to customers or upon receipt of
products to customers dependent
31
upon the terms and conditions of the Web store. Our revenue
recognition accounting estimates contain uncertainties because
they require management to make assumptions and to apply
judgment to estimate future sales returns.
Net revenues from product sales decreased $34.9 million in
fiscal 2009. Of this decrease, $57.1 million was due to the
decrease in revenues from clients that did not operate for the
entirety of both periods as well as a decrease due to the
transition during the first quarter of fiscal 2009 of one owned
inventory client to a non-owned inventory
e-commerce
agreement structure the client transition discussed below, and
$3.9 million was due to the decrease in revenues from
clients that operated for the entirety of both periods,
partially offset by a $26.1 million increase in revenues
from RCI which was acquired in mid-November.
Total shipping revenue was $133.1 million for fiscal 2009
and $120.2 million for fiscal 2008. Fiscal 2009 included
52 weeks compared to 53 weeks for fiscal 2008, and the
extra week added incremental net revenues from product sales of
approximately $11.0 million for fiscal 2008.
Service Fee Revenues. Service fee revenues
include revenues from the provision of
e-commerce
services and interactive marketing services.
E-commerce
service fee revenues are generated from a clients use of
one or more of our
e-commerce
platform components, which include technology, fulfillment and
customer care, as well as from professional services and gift
card breakage. Interactive marketing services service fee
revenues are generated from online marketing, advertising, email
and design services.
E-commerce
service fee revenues can be fixed or variable and are based on
the activity performed, the value of merchandise sold, or the
gross profit from a transaction.
Service fee revenues increased $72.2 million in fiscal
2009. This increase was primarily due to an increase in revenues
from our
e-commerce
segment including the client transition discussed above, and the
growth of our interactive marketing services segment. Partially
offsetting these increases was a decrease in revenues from
clients that are no longer operating with us, including the
liquidation of a client that was one of our top ten contributors
of service fee revenues for fiscal 2008. The
53rd week
in fiscal 2008 added incremental service fee revenues of
approximately $7.5 million for fiscal 2008.
For fiscal 2010, we expect an increase in total net revenues.
Net
Revenues by Segment
E-Commerce
Services Segment Revenues. Net revenues from
e-commerce
services decreased $20.4 million in fiscal 2009 due to a
$60.9 million decrease in net revenues from product sales
which was partially offset by an increase of $40.5 million
in service fee revenues.
Of the $20.4 million decrease in net revenues from our
e-commerce
services segment, $59.4 million was from clients that are
no longer operating with us and from the client transition,
which are both discussed above. Partially offsetting these
decreases was an increase of $25.8 million from clients
that operated for the entirety of both periods and
$13.2 million from clients that began generating revenue
for us in fiscal 2009.
Interactive Marketing Services Segment
Revenues. Net revenues from interactive marketing
services increased by $43.1 million in fiscal 2009. Key
drivers of the increase include growth of
e-mail
marketing services provided by
e-Dialog,
growth of the design, studio and online marketing services
provided by TrueAction, the acquisition of Silverlign Group Inc.
(Silverlign) in April 2009, and the acquisition of
Pepperjam in September 2009.
Consumer Engagement Segment Revenues. Net
revenues increased $26.3 million due to the acquisition of
RCI in November 2009.
32
Costs and
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of revenues from product sales
|
|
$
|
405.3
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
$
|
398.6
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
$
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
Marketing
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
Account management and operations
|
|
|
260.3
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
273.1
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Product development
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
120.2
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
69.0
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
68.1
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
63.4
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
Changes in fair value of deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
977.2
|
|
|
|
101
|
%
|
|
$
|
993.9
|
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Revenues from Product Sales. Costs of
revenues from product sales consist primarily of direct costs
associated with (i) products we sell through our clients
Web stores, (ii) products we sell through the Web stores in
our consumer engagement segment, and (iii) our shipping
charges for all Web stores for which we provide fulfillment
services. Costs of revenues from product sales were attributable
to our
e-commerce
services and consumer engagement segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
Cost of revenues from product sales
|
|
$
|
405.3
|
|
|
$
|
398.6
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues from product sales
|
|
|
70
|
%
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
Cost of revenues from product sales decreased $6.7 million
in fiscal 2009. The decrease in cost of revenues as a percentage
of net revenues from 42% in fiscal 2008 to 40% in fiscal 2009
was primarily due to the increase in service fees and the
decrease in product sales, because service fees have no
associated cost of revenue.
The increase in cost of revenues from product sales as a
percentage of net revenues from product sales from 70% to 74%
was primarily due to an increase in shipping revenue. Our cost
of generating shipping revenue is higher than our cost of
generating revenue on sale of products.
We expect cost of product sales to increase in absolute dollars
in fiscal 2010. The extent to which cost of product sales
increases or decreases as a percentage of net revenue and net
revenue from product sales will depend on the relative growth
rates of RCI, shipping revenue, other product sales and service
fees.
Marketing. Marketing expenses consist
primarily of net client revenue share charges, promotional free
shipping and subsidized shipping and handling costs, catalog
costs, and net advertising and promotional expenses. Marketing
expenses support our net revenues from product sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
Marketing
|
|
$
|
70.3
|
|
|
$
|
54.8
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues from product sales
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Marketing expenses decreased $15.5 million in fiscal 2009.
As a percentage of net revenues, marketing expenses decreased
from 7% in fiscal 2008 to 6% in fiscal 2009. This decrease was
primarily due to the higher percentage increase in service fees
compared to the percentage increase in product sales, because
service fees typically have no associated marketing expenses.
As a percentage of net revenues from product sales, marketing
expenses decreased from 12% in fiscal 2008 to 10% in fiscal
2009. Of the $15.5 million decrease in marketing expenses,
$7.6 million was due to a decrease in client revenue share
expenses caused by decreased sales from owned inventory clients,
$4.0 million was due to a decrease in promotional, free,
and subsidized shipping and handling costs, and
$3.9 million was due to a decrease in
33
advertising costs. The decreases in client revenue share
expenses and advertising costs were primarily the result of the
client transition discussed above and have minimal impact on
marketing expenses as a percentage of net revenue from product
sales, because of the corresponding decrease in net revenues
from product sales as a result of the client transition.
We expect marketing expenses to increase in absolute dollars
during fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009. The extent to which
marketing expenses increase or decrease as a percentage of net
revenue and net revenue from product sales will depend on the
relative growth rates of RCI, other product sales and service
fees.
Account Management and Operations. Account
management and operations expenses consist primarily of costs to
operate our fulfillment centers and customer care centers,
credit card fees, and payroll related to our buying, business
management, operations and marketing functions.
Account management and operations expenses increased
$12.8 million in fiscal 2009. As a percentage of net
revenues, account management and operations expenses remained
constant at 27%. The increase in absolute dollars was primarily
due to our acquisitions of RCI, Silverlign and Pepperjam in
fiscal 2009 as well as increases in personnel and related costs
mostly from our interactive marketing services segment,
partially offset by decreases in fulfillment expenses. We expect
account management and operations expenses to increase in
absolute dollars in fiscal 2010 due to the acquisition of RCI
and growth in our
e-commerce
services and interactive marketing services segments.
Product Development. Product development
expenses consist primarily of expenses associated with planning,
maintaining and operating our proprietary
e-commerce
and e-mail
platforms and related systems, and payroll and related expenses
for engineering, production, creative and management information
systems.
Product development expenses increased $16.0 million in
fiscal 2009. As a percentage of net revenues, product
development expenses increased from 11% to 12%. The increases in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of net revenues were
primarily due to increased personnel expenses to enhance our
e-commerce
technology platform. We expect product development expenses to
increase in absolute dollars in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal
2009, as we plan to continue to launch additional client Web
stores, invest in our
e-commerce,
interactive marketing services and consumer engagement platforms
and expand our international operations.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related
expenses for executive, finance, human resources, legal, sales
and administrative personnel, as well as bad debt expense and
occupancy costs for our headquarters and other offices.
General and administrative expenses increased $13.9 million
in fiscal 2009. As a percentage of net revenues, general and
administrative expenses increased from 7% to 8%. The increase in
absolute dollars was primarily due to personnel and related
expenses as well as our acquisition of RCI. We expect general
and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars in
fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 primarily due to the
acquisition of RCI.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization expenses relate primarily to the depreciation
or amortization of the capitalized costs for our purchased and
internally-developed technology, including a portion of the cost
related to the employees that developed such technology,
hardware and software; furniture and equipment at our corporate
headquarters, fulfillment centers and customer care centers; the
office buildings and other facilities owned by us; and
acquisition-related intangible assets.
Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased
$4.7 million in fiscal 2009. As a percentage of net
revenues, depreciation and amortization expenses decreased from
7% to 6%. Amortization expenses decreased $2.8 million
primarily due to the intangible asset amortization related to
the e-Dialog
acquisition in fiscal 2008. Depreciation expenses decreased
$1.9 million due to the acceleration of depreciation for
abandoned equipment in fiscal 2008 related to a facility closure
and from reduced capital expenditures in fiscal 2009, partially
offset by the depreciation of prior and current year fixed asset
additions. We expect our capital expenditures for fiscal 2010 to
increase, and we expect depreciation expenses to increase due to
the acquisition of RCI and as we continue to depreciate capital
expenditures made in prior years. We expect amortization
expenses to increase in fiscal 2010 compared to fiscal 2009 due
to the acquisition of RCI.
34
Changes in Fair Value of Deferred Acquisition
Payments. Changes in fair value of deferred
acquisition payments expenses consist of the change in the fair
value of future estimated acquisition payments.
Changes in fair value of deferred acquisition payments expenses
increased from $0 to $0.9 million due to the acquisition of
RCI. We expect changes in fair value of deferred acquisition
payments to increase in fiscal 2010 as we accrete the liability
up to the estimated payment amount even if our assumptions
utilized to value the earnout of RCI do not change. For more
information on the earnout see Note 6, Acquisitions,
to our consolidated financial statements included in
Item 15, Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule,
of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Any change in our assumptions may result in a significant change
to our change in fair value of deferred acquisition payments.
Fiscal 2009 included 52 weeks compared to 53 weeks for
fiscal 2008. The extra week did not materially impact our costs
and expenses for fiscal 2008.
Comparison
of Fiscal 2008 and 2007 (amounts in tables in
millions):
Net
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net Revenues by Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues from product sales
|
|
$
|
512.2
|
|
|
|
68
|
%
|
|
$
|
577.1
|
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
$
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Service fee revenues
|
|
|
237.8
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
389.8
|
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
152.0
|
|
|
|
64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
750.0
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
966.9
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
216.9
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues by Segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-Commerce
services
|
|
$
|
737.9
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
$
|
900.0
|
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
$
|
162.1
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
Interactive marketing services
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
57.6
|
|
|
|
214
|
%
|
Intersegment eliminations
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(17.6
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
750.0
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
966.9
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
216.9
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Revenues by Type
Net Revenues from Product Sales. Net revenues
from product sales increased $64.9 million in fiscal 2008.
This increase was primarily due to revenue growth from our
professional sports league clients and an increase in shipping
revenue, partially offset by a decrease in sales from one
consumer electronics client. Of this increase,
$34.3 million was due to the increase in revenues from
clients that operated for the entirety of both periods,
$29.5 million was due to the increase in revenues from
clients that initially began generating revenue during fiscal
2007, which includes clients of Accretive Commerce, Inc.
(Accretive) which we acquired during the third
quarter of fiscal 2007, and $1.1 million was due to the
increase in revenues from clients that were launched in fiscal
2008. Shipping revenue for all clients for which we provide
fulfillment services was $120.2 million for fiscal 2008 and
$82.9 million for fiscal 2007. Fiscal 2008 included
53 weeks compared to 52 weeks for fiscal 2007, and the
extra week added incremental net revenues from product sales of
approximately $11.0 million.
Service Fee Revenues. Service fee revenues
increased $152.0 million in fiscal 2008. This increase was
primarily due to the acquisitions of Accretive and
e-Dialog,
which closed in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 and first
quarter of fiscal 2008, respectively, as well as growth from
clients that operated for the entirety of fiscal years 2007 and
2008. Of this increase, $69.4 million was attributable to
clients that launched in fiscal 2008, including the addition of
e-Dialog
clients. Also included in the $69.4 million increase was
$3.0 million from gift card breakage, for which we began
recognizing revenue in fiscal 2008. $53.0 million of the
increase was from clients that initially began generating
revenue during fiscal 2007, including the addition of Accretive
clients, and $29.6 million was from clients that operated
for the entirety of both periods. The $29.6 million
increase for clients that operated for the
35
entirety of both periods decreased from the $36.8 million
increase for clients that operated for the entirety of fiscal
2007 and fiscal 2006 due primarily to a decline in the growth
rate of existing client sales and the liquidation of the
business of a client that was one of our top ten contributors of
service fee revenues for fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007. The extra
week in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007 added incremental
service fee revenues of approximately $7.5 million.
Net
Revenues by Segment
E-Commerce
Services Segment Revenues. Net revenues from
e-commerce
services increased $162.1 million in fiscal 2008. This
increase was comprised of $97.2 million from service fee
revenues (an increase from $225.7 million in fiscal 2007 to
$322.9 million in fiscal 2008) and $64.9 million
from net revenues from product sales (an increase from
$512.2 million in fiscal 2007 to $577.1 million in
fiscal 2008).
Of the $162.1 million increase in net revenues from our
e-commerce
services segment, $77.0 million was from clients that
initially began generating revenue during fiscal 2007, including
the addition of Accretive clients, $62.6 million was from
clients that operated for the entirety of both periods, and
$22.5 million was from clients that launched in fiscal 2008.
Of the $97.2 million service fee revenue increase,
$47.5 million was from clients that launched during fiscal
2007, including the addition of Accretive clients,
$28.3 million was from clients that operated for the
entirety of both periods, and $21.4 million was from
clients that launched during fiscal 2008. See the discussion
above under Net Revenues by Type Net Revenues
from Product Sales for a discussion of the
$64.9 million increase in net revenues from product sales.
Interactive Marketing Services Segment
Revenues. Net revenues from interactive marketing
services increased $57.6 million due primarily to the
acquisition of
e-Dialog in
February 2008 and, to a lesser extent, growth in our online
marketing, design, and digital photo studio services.
Costs and
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Cost of revenues from product sales
|
|
$
|
356.5
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
$
|
405.3
|
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
$
|
48.8
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Marketing
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Account management and operations
|
|
|
177.5
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
260.3
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
82.8
|
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
Product development
|
|
|
66.0
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
104.2
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
38.2
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
69.0
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
68.1
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
745.6
|
|
|
|
99
|
%
|
|
$
|
977.2
|
|
|
|
101
|
%
|
|
$
|
231.6
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of
Revenues from Product Sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
Cost of revenues from product sales
|
|
$
|
356.5
|
|
|
$
|
405.3
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues from product sales
|
|
|
69.6
|
%
|
|
|
70.2
|
%
|
Cost of revenues from product sales increased $48.8 million
in fiscal 2008. The decrease in cost of revenues as a percentage
of net revenues from 47% in fiscal 2007 to 42% in fiscal 2008
was primarily due to the higher percentage increase in service
fees compared to the percentage increase in product sales,
because service fees have no associated cost of revenue.
36
The increase in cost of revenues from product sales as a
percentage of net revenues from product sales from 69.6% in
fiscal 2007 to 70.2% in fiscal 2008 was primarily due to an
increase in shipping revenue. Our cost of generating shipping
revenue is higher than our cost of generating revenue on sale of
the underlying physical product.
Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
Marketing
|
|
$
|
64.6
|
|
|
$
|
70.3
|
|
As a percentage of net revenues from product sales
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Marketing expenses increased $5.7 million in fiscal 2008.
As a percentage of net revenues, marketing expenses decreased
from 8% in fiscal 2007 to 7% in fiscal 2008. This decrease was
primarily due to the higher percentage increase in service fees
compared to the percentage increase in product sales, because
service fees typically have no associated marketing expenses.
As a percentage of net revenues from product sales, marketing
expenses decreased slightly from 13% in fiscal 2007 to 12% in
fiscal 2008 due a to decrease in promotional free shipping and
subsidized shipping and handling costs. The $5.7 million
increase in marketing expenses was primarily due to a
$6.5 million increase in client revenue share expenses
caused by growth in revenue from our professional sports league
clients, and a $1.1 million increase in catalog costs,
partially offset by a $1.9 million decrease in promotional
free shipping and subsidized shipping and handling costs.
Account Management and Operations. Account
management and operations expenses increased $82.8 million
in fiscal 2008. As a percentage of net revenues, account
management and operations expenses increased from 24% in fiscal
2007 to 27% in fiscal 2008. The increases in absolute dollars
and as a percentage of net revenues were primarily due to the
e-Dialog,
Zendor.com Ltd. (Zendor) and Accretive acquisitions
in February 2008, December 2007 and September 2007,
respectively, and
start-up,
occupancy and payroll expenses related to our Richwood, Kentucky
fulfillment center, which commenced operations in the second
quarter of fiscal 2007. The $82.8 million increase in
account management and operations expenses was due to a
$53.8 million increase in payroll and related costs mostly
in our customer care and fulfillment operations, a
$14.0 million increase in office expenses and occupancy
costs, a $7.2 million increase in credit card fees, and a
$7.8 million increase in other account management and
operations costs which include professional fees and
communication costs.
Product Development. Product development
expenses increased $38.2 million in fiscal 2008. As a
percentage of net revenues, product development expenses
increased from 9% in fiscal 2007 to 11% fiscal 2008. The
increases in absolute dollars and as a percentage of net
revenues were primarily due to the
e-Dialog,
Zendor and Accretive acquisitions, payroll expenses and
professional fees incurred for client launches during fiscal
2008 and expected future client launches, and increased expenses
to enhance the technology features and functionality on our
e-commerce
platform. The $38.2 million increase in product development
expenses was primarily due to a $24.9 million increase in
personnel and related costs, a $4.8 million increase in
professional fees, a $2.9 million increase in office
expenses and occupancy costs, a $2.9 million increase in
software and equipment maintenance, and a $2.7 million
increase in other product development costs.
General and Administrative. General and
administrative expenses increased $25.3 million in fiscal
2008. As a percentage of net revenues, general and
administrative expenses increased from 6% in fiscal 2007 to 7%
in fiscal 2008. The increases in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of net revenues were primarily due to the
e-Dialog,
Zendor and Accretive acquisitions, the addition of new clients,
the expansion of the
e-commerce
businesses of our existing clients and the expansion of our
interactive marketing services business. The $25.3 million
increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily
due to a $17.2 million increase in personnel and related
costs to support the growth of our business, a $4.7 million
increase in professional fees, a $1.2 million increase in
office expenses and occupancy costs, $0.9 million in deal
costs for a potential acquisition no longer deemed probable, and
a $1.3 million increase in other general and administrative
costs.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation
and amortization expenses increased $30.8 million in fiscal
2008. As a percentage of net revenues, depreciation and
amortization expenses increased from 5% in fiscal 2007 to
37
7% in fiscal 2008. Depreciation expenses increased
$21.8 million due to the depreciation of prior and current
year fixed asset additions. Amortization expenses increased
$9.0 million primarily due to the intangible asset
amortization in connection with the Accretive and
e-Dialog
acquisitions.
Fiscal 2008 included 53 weeks compared to 52 weeks for
fiscal 2007. The extra week did not materially impact our costs
and expenses for fiscal 2008.
Other
(Income) Expense
Other (income) expense consists of interest expense, interest
income, other expense, loss on sales of marketable securities,
and impairment of equity investments. Interest expense consists
primarily of interest related to our convertible notes and our
secured revolving bank credit facility. The interest income
consists of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents. Other
expense consists primarily of foreign currency transaction
losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)%
|
Other expense
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
Impairment of equity investments
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses
|
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
$
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We derive our interest expense primarily from the amortization
of the debt discount on our convertible notes, the coupon
interest on our convertible notes, and our secured revolving
credit facility. Interest expense remained relatively constant
in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. The $1.3 million
decrease in interest income was due to lower interest rates
earned in fiscal 2009. The $1.6 million decrease in other
expense was primarily due to larger foreign currency exchange
losses in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2009 on transactions
denominated in currencies other than the functional currency.
The fiscal 2008 $1.7 million impairment of equity
investments was due to an
other-than-temporary
impairment on an equity investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
|
vs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
$
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)%
|
Other expense
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
700
|
%
|
Loss on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)%
|
Impairment of equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
151
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense increased $12.2 million in fiscal 2008. The
$6.6 million increase in interest expense was primarily due
to the amortization of the debt discount on our convertible
notes, the interest on our 2.5% convertible notes issued in July
2007, and our line of credit which we entered into in January
2008. The $7.5 million decrease in interest income was due
to lower cash balances and lower interest rates earned in fiscal
2008. The $1.4 million increase in other expense was
primarily due to foreign currency exchange losses on
transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional
currency. The fiscal 2007 $5.0 million loss on sale of
marketable securities related to the sale of our auction rate
securities. The $1.7 million increase in impairment of
equity investments was due to an
other-than-temporary
impairment on an equity investment incurred in fiscal 2008.
38
Income
Taxes
Our effective tax rate for fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007 was
(27.0%), 24.8% and 75.1%, respectively. Our tax rate is affected
by recurring items such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions
and the relevant amount of income we earn in each jurisdiction,
which has not been consistent as we seek to expand our presence
in the international market, as well as the reversal of
valuation allowances in some years. In addition to state income
taxes, the following items had the most significant impact on
the difference between our effective income tax rate and the
statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%:
Fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
A $3.1 million (or 37.4%) reduction in the tax benefit
primarily resulting from the imposition of a valuation allowance
on foreign losses,
|
Fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
A $2.1 million (or 6.8%) reduction in the tax benefit
primarily resulting from the imposition of a valuation allowance
on foreign losses; and
|
|
|
|
a $0.6 million (or 1.9%) reduction in the tax benefit
resulting from rate differences between U.S. and
non-U.S. jurisdictions.
|
Fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
A $0.3 million (or 7.7%) increase in tax benefit resulting
from the reversal of valuation allowance.
|
Seasonality
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience
seasonal fluctuations in our revenues from
e-commerce
services. These seasonal patterns will cause quarterly
fluctuations in our operating results. We also expect to
experience seasonal fluctuations from consumer engagement, but
to a lesser degree than with our
e-commerce
services. We experience less seasonality in our revenues from
interactive marketing services. The fourth fiscal quarter has
accounted for and is expected to continue to account for a
disproportionate percentage of our total annual revenues. We
believe that results of operations for any quarterly period may
not be indicative of the results for any other quarter or for
the full year. We recognized 42.8%, 40.5% and 44.7% of our
annual net revenues during the fourth quarter of fiscals 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. For additional information, see
Note 16, Quarterly Results (Unaudited), to our
consolidated financial statements included in Item 15,
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule, of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
January 3,
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
231.5
|
|
|
$
|
130.3
|
|
|
$
|
228.4
|
|
Percentage of total assets
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Sources
of Cash
Our principal sources of liquidity in fiscal 2009 were our cash
and cash equivalents balances, cash provided by operating
activities, and cash provided by financing activities, including
the $88 million of net proceeds received in August 2009
through our sale of common stock.
39
As of January 2, 2010, we had $228.4 million of cash
and cash equivalents, compared to $130.3 million of cash
and cash equivalents as of January 3, 2009. Cash
equivalents are comprised of money market mutual funds.
Cash provided by operating activities was $140.2 million,
$96.0 million, and $58.1 million in fiscal 2009,
fiscal 2008, and fiscal 2007, respectively. Cash provided by
operating activities is driven by our net loss, adjusted for
non-cash items and changes in operating assets and liabilities.
Non-cash adjustments include depreciation, amortization,
stock-based compensation expense and deferred income taxes. Cash
provided by operating activities was greater than our net loss
in fiscal 2009 primarily due to the net impact of non-cash
adjustments to loss as well as an increase to our accounts
payable and accrued expense balances and a decrease to our
accounts receivable balance.
We have experienced and expect to continue to experience
seasonal fluctuations in our cash flows. We generate the
majority of our cash from operating activities in our fourth
fiscal quarter. In our first fiscal quarter, we typically use
cash generated from operating activities in the fourth quarter
of the prior fiscal year to satisfy accounts payable and accrued
expenses incurred in the fourth fiscal quarter of our prior
fiscal year. During our second and third fiscal quarters, we
generally fund our operating expenses and capital expenditures
from cash generated from operating activities, cash and cash
equivalents,
and/or cash
from financing activities.
As of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009 we had no
borrowings under our $90 million secured revolving bank
credit facility. During fiscal 2009, we did not borrow on the
secured revolving credit facility, and during fiscal 2008 we
borrowed and also repaid $70 million on our secured
revolving credit facility. The credit facility contains
financial and restrictive covenants that limit our ability to
engage in activities that may be in our long term best
interests. We do not believe the financial covenants will limit
our ability to utilize the entire borrowing availability in
fiscal 2010, if necessary.
During fiscal 2007, we issued subordinated convertible notes
resulting in net proceeds of $145 million.
Uses
of Cash
We invest cash to support our operations, our infrastructure
needs, and as consideration for acquisitions and strategic
investments. Cash used in investing activities is primarily
attributable to capital expenditures and acquisitions.
Our capital expenditures totaled $43.0 million,
$57.2 million, and $54.2 million in fiscal 2009,
fiscal 2008, and fiscal 2007, respectively. Our capital
expenditures have generally been comprised of purchases of
computer hardware and software, development of internal-use
software, purchases of furniture and fixtures, and purchases of
real estate. Capital expenditures decreased 25% in fiscal 2009
compared to the 6% increase in fiscal 2008. We expect an
increase in capital expenditures in fiscal 2010 due to increased
investments in our infrastructure and technology as well as from
our acquisition of RCI.
We utilized $88.9 million of cash for acquisitions in
fiscal 2009, compared to $145.0 million and
$103.7 million in acquisitions and equity investments in
fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, respectively. Acquisitions in
fiscal 2009 primarily included RCI which we also issued shares
of our common stock valued at approximately $94 million. In
addition, we will be obligated to pay RCI shareholders and
employees additional earnout payments of up to $170 million
over a three year period beginning with fiscal year 2010
contingent on RCIs achievement of certain performance
targets, of which we have the ability to pay up to
$44.1 million with shares of our common stock. We funded
the cash payment for RCI acquisition from our existing cash and
cash equivalent balances. Acquisitions in fiscal 2008 included
e-Dialog and
our fiscal 2007 acquisitions included Accretive and Zendor.
Outlook
We expect to continue to generate positive cash flow from
operations in fiscal 2010, the majority of which will be
generated in our fourth fiscal quarter. We believe that our cash
flow from operating activities, cash and cash equivalents
balances, and borrowing availability under our secured revolving
credit facility will be sufficient to meet our anticipated
operating cash needs for at least the next 12 months.
However, any projections of future cash needs and cash flows are
subject to substantial uncertainty. See Item 1A of
Part I, Risk Factors.
40
Holders of our 3% subordinated convertible notes due
June 1, 2025 may require us to repurchase the notes at
a repurchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on June 1, 2010. In
the event our holders require us to repurchase the notes in
fiscal 2010, we expect to have sufficient liquidity from our
cash from operating activities, our cash and cash equivalents
and/or from
our secured revolving bank credit facility to fund the
repurchases as well as our operating cash needs. See
Note 7, Long-Term Debt and Credit Facility, of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in
Item 15, Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule,
of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We continually evaluate opportunities to sell additional equity
or debt securities, obtain credit facilities, or repurchase,
refinance, or otherwise restructure our long-term debt for
strategic reasons or to further strengthen our financial
position. Our secured revolving bank credit facility contains
negative covenants including prohibitions on our ability to
incur additional indebtedness. The sale of additional equity or
convertible debt securities would likely be dilutive to our
stockholders. In addition, we will, from time to time, consider
the acquisition of, or investment in, complementary businesses,
products, services, and technologies, which might affect our
liquidity requirements or cause us to issue additional equity or
debt securities. There can be no assurance that additional
lines-of-credit
or financing instruments will be available in amounts or on
terms acceptable to us, if at all.
Contractual
Obligations
We had the following contractual obligations as of the end of
fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by fiscal year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligation(1)(2)(3)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
95.4
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
$
|
33.9
|
|
|
$
|
21.9
|
|
|
$
|
19.0
|
|
Purchase obligations and marketing commitments(4)
|
|
|
155.2
|
|
|
|
72.1
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
Client revenue share payments
|
|
|
89.5
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
Debt interest
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
Debt obligations
|
|
|
220.0
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
150.5
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
Capital lease obligations, including interest
|
|
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
618.4
|
|
|
$
|
184.3
|
|
|
$
|
121.2
|
|
|
$
|
203.9
|
|
|
$
|
109.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For additional information, see Note 7, Long-Term Debt
and Credit Facility, and Note 8, Commitments and
Contingencies, of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements, included in Item 15, Exhibits and Financial
Statement Schedule, of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Approximately $2.1 million of unrecognized tax benefits
have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with accounting
standards for Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, and we are uncertain as to if or when such amounts
may be settled; as a result, these obligations are not included
in the table above. |
|
(3) |
|
We will be obligated to pay additional earnout payments of up to
$170 million over a three year period beginning with fiscal
year 2010 contingent on RCIs achievement of certain
financial performance targets, of which we have the ability to
pay up to $44.1 million with shares of our common stock. The
contingent payments are not included in the table above. |
|
(4) |
|
Purchase obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods
or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that
specify all significant terms, including fixed or minimum
quantities to be purchased, fixed, minimum or variable pricing
provisions and the approximate timing of the transactions. These
obligations relate primarily to commitments to purchase
inventory, which generally are cancelable without penalty if
canceled prior to shipment. |
41
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off balance sheet arrangements other than the
obligations not required to be recorded on the balance sheet as
shown above in the contractual obligations table.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make significant judgments and
estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period as well as the related disclosures. Management bases
these significant judgments and estimates on historical
experience, current trends and other assumptions it believes to
be reasonable based upon information presently available. On a
regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies,
assumptions, judgments and estimates to ensure that our
financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. However, because
future events and their affects cannot be determined with
certainty, actual results could differ from those estimates
under different assumptions, judgments or conditions.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in
Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in
Item 15, Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule,
of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Management has identified the following as our critical
accounting estimates, which are defined as those that reflect
significant judgments and uncertainties, are the most pervasive
and important to the presentation of our financial condition and
results of operations and could potentially result in materially
different results under different assumptions, judgments or
conditions. Management has reviewed these critical accounting
estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales, which includes shipping
revenue and excludes sales tax, from the sale of products by us
through our clients
e-commerce
Web stores as well as through the Web stores in our consumer
engagement segment when title and risk of ownership passes to
the consumer, net of estimated returns based on historical
experience and current trends. Our revenue recognition
accounting estimates contain uncertainties because they require
management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate
future sales returns.
We have not made any material changes in the accounting
methodology used to measure sales returns during the past three
fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood
that there will be a material change in the future estimates or
assumptions we use to measure sales returns. However, if actual
results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions
stated above, we may be exposed to income or losses that could
be material to our consolidated financial statements.
A 10% change in our sales return reserve at January 2,
2010, would have affected earnings before income taxes by
approximately $0.6 million.
In our consumer engagement segment and in the circumstances in
our
e-commerce
services segment in which we own the inventory for our
clients Web stores and record revenue as product sales, we
may sell gift cards to our customers through our Web stores and
through selected third parties. We recognize income from gift
cards when: (i) the gift card is redeemed by the customer;
or (ii) the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by
the customer is remote and we determine that we do not have a
legal obligation to remit the value of unredeemed gift cards to
the relevant jurisdictions (gift card breakage). Based on
historical redemption patterns, the likelihood of a gift card
remaining unredeemed can be determined 24 months after the
gift card is issued.
A 10% change in our assumptions on future gift card redemptions
at January 2, 2010, would have affected earnings before
income taxes by approximately $0.5 million.
Fiscal 2008 was the first year we recognized income for gift
card breakage. We do not believe there is a reasonable
likelihood that there will be a material change in the future
estimates or assumptions we use to measure
42
gift card breakage. However, if actual gift card redemptions are
not consistent with our estimates or assumptions stated above,
or if laws change that would result in us having a legal
obligation to remit the value of unredeemed gift cards to
certain jurisdictions, we may be exposed to income or losses
that could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Allowance
for Accounts Receivable
We maintain allowances for estimated losses resulting from the
inability of our clients and customers to make required
payments. We analyze accounts receivable and consider our
historical bad debt experience, customer credit-worthiness,
current economic trends and changes in our customer payment
terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful
accounts. There may be material differences in our operating
results for any period if we change our estimates or if the
estimates are not accurate.
Our allowance for accounts receivable was $4.6 million as
of January 2, 2010. Historically, our actual losses and
credits have been consistent with our estimates. However, future
changes in trends could result in a material impact to future
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows. A 10%
change from our estimates of allowance for accounts receivable
at January 2, 2010, would have affected earnings before
income taxes by approximately $0.5 million.
Accounting
for Inventory
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost (determined using the
weighted average method) or market. Inherent in this valuation
are significant management judgments and estimates, including
among others, assessments concerning obsolescence and shrinkage.
Based upon these judgments and estimates, which are applied
consistently from period to period, we record obsolescence and
shrinkage allowances to adjust the carrying amount of our
inventory. We record a charge for obsolescence based upon, among
other factors, the aging of the inventory, forecasted customer
demand and the anticipated mark-downs required to sell the
inventory in the normal course of business. We record a charge
for inventory shrinkage for damages and other losses based on
rates experienced in our fulfillment centers. We have not made
any material changes in the accounting methodology used to
measure inventory obsolescence or shrinkage during the past
three fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable
likelihood that there will be a material change in the future
judgments or estimates we use to calculate our inventory
valuation allowances. However, if our judgments or estimates
regarding inventory valuation allowances are inaccurate, we may
be exposed to income or losses to our consolidated financial
statements. A 10% change in our shrink and obsolescence
allowance combined as of January 2, 2010, would have
affected earnings before income taxes by approximately
$0.2 million.
Accounting
for Internal Use Software
Included in our property and equipment is the capitalized cost
of internal-use software development and Web store development,
including software used to upgrade and enhance the Web stores we
operate and processes supporting our business. We capitalize
costs incurred during the application development stage related
to the development of internal-use software and amortize these
costs over the estimated useful life of four years. Costs
incurred related to planning and training relating to or
maintenance of internal-use software is expensed as incurred. We
capitalized $29.9 million, $26.2 million and
$23.0 million, of costs associated with internal-use
software and Web store development during the fiscal years ended
January 2, 2010, January 3, 2009 and December 29,
2007, respectively. We depreciated $21.1 million,
$16.5 million and $11.5 million of previously
capitalized amounts in fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007.
Changes in strategy
and/or
market conditions could significantly impact the carrying value
of our internal-use software and Web store development costs. We
use estimates and make assumptions to determine the related
estimated useful lives and assess the carrying value of
internal-use software and Web store development costs. We do not
believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a
material change in the future judgments we use to calculate the
estimated useful life of our internal use software. However, if
our judgments or estimates regarding internal use software are
inaccurate and we were to reduce the useful life of our internal
use software, we may be exposed to losses, including impairment
losses that could be material to our consolidated financial
statements.
43
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
The purchase price of an acquired company is allocated between
the intangible assets and net tangible assets of the acquired
business with the residual of the purchase price recorded as
goodwill. The determination of the value of the intangible
assets acquired involves certain judgments and estimates. These
judgments can include, but are not limited to, the cash flows
that an asset is expected to generate in the future and the
appropriate weighted average cost of capital (WACC)
for market participants.
Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are
tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value
may not be recoverable. Application of the impairment test
requires judgment, including the identification of reporting
units, assigning assets and liabilities to reporting units,
assigning goodwill to reporting units, and determining the fair
value of each reporting unit. We determine fair value using
widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash
flow analyses, analysis of our market capitalization, analysis
of peer public companies and other assumptions. These types of
analyses contain assumptions and uncertainties because they
require management to apply judgment to estimate industry
economic factors and the profitability of future business
strategies. The estimate of cash flow is based upon, among other
things, certain assumptions about expected future operating
performance and an appropriate discount rate determined by
management. Our estimates of discounted cash flows may differ
from actual cash flows due to, among other things, economic
conditions, changes to our business model or changes in
operating performance. Significant differences between these
estimates and actual cash flows could materially affect our
future financial results.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we completed our annual
impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible
assets using methodologies described herein. We determined there
was no impairment, as the fair value exceeded the book value of
net assets for each of our reporting units. During the course of
the impairment testing, we made significant assumptions and
applied judgment to estimate industry economic factors and the
profitability of future business strategies. We made assumptions
about our future discounted cash flows using operating income
before depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation
by including the impact of new business as well as growth of our
costs and expenses based on the historical relationship of those
measures. We also made assumptions about our amount of future
capital expenditures, and determined a discount rate based on a
WACC specifically for each reporting unit. Any changes to our
assumptions, or if actual results differ from our estimates,
could result in a significant decrease of the fair value for a
reporting unit which may expose us to impairment losses that
could be material to our consolidated financial statements. A
10% reduction of our calculated fair value for any reportable
unit that maintains a goodwill balance would still be greater
than the carrying value of that reportable unit as of
January 2, 2010. The carrying value of our goodwill was
$373.0 million as of January 2, 2010. The carrying
value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets was
$78.2 million as of January 2, 2010.
Finite intangible assets that have determinable useful lives are
tested for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be
recoverable. The carrying value is not recoverable if it exceeds
the undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the
asset and its eventual disposition. When there is existence of
one or more indicators of impairment, we measure the impairment
of finite intangible assets based on a projected discounted cash
flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be
commensurate with the risk inherent in our business model. Our
estimates of future cash flows attributable to our intangible
assets require significant judgment based on our historical and
anticipated results and are subject to many factors. Different
assumptions and judgments could materially affect the
calculation of the fair value of our finite intangible assets
which could trigger impairment.
The carrying value of our finite intangibles as of
January 2, 2010 was $54.6 million. There were no
events or changes in circumstances that indicated the carrying
value of our finite intangible assets may not be recoverable.
We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there
will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions
we use to test for goodwill or other intangible assets. However,
if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and
assumptions, or if certain of our customer relationships were to
discontinue prior to their contract expiration dates, we may be
exposed to an impairment charge that could be material.
44
Income
Taxes and Deferred Taxes
Our income tax benefit or expense, deferred tax assets and
liabilities and reserves for uncertain tax positions reflect
managements best assessment of estimated current and
future taxes to be paid. We are subject to income taxes in both
the U.S. and in several foreign jurisdictions. Significant
judgments and estimates are required in determining the
consolidated income tax benefit or expense.
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between
the tax and financial statement recognition of revenue and
expense. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax
assets within the jurisdiction from which they arise we consider
all available positive and negative evidence, including
scheduled reversals of deferred tax assets and liabilities,
projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and
recent financial operations. In projecting future taxable
income, we begin with historical results and changes in
accounting policies and incorporate assumptions including the
amount of future state, federal and foreign pretax operating
income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the
implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies.
These assumptions require significant judgment about the
forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the
plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying
businesses. In evaluating the objective evidence that historical
results provide, we consider three years of cumulative operating
income
and/or loss
adjusted for any non-recurring items.
As of January 2, 2010, we had federal, state and foreign
income tax net operating loss carryforwards of
$507.3 million, $268.6 million and $18.7 million,
respectively which will expire at various dates from 2010
through 2029 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010-2015
|
|
$
|
59.3 million
|
|
2016-2021
|
|
|
396.5 million
|
|
2022-2029
|
|
|
338.8 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
794.6 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that it is more likely than not that the full benefit
from certain federal, state and foreign net operating loss
carryforwards will not be realized. Accordingly, we have
provided a valuation allowance of $154.6 million on the
deferred tax assets relating to these net operating loss
carryforwards. If our assumptions change and we determine we
will be able to realize these NOLs, the tax benefits relating to
any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
at January 2, 2010 will be accounted for as follows:
approximately $154.6 million will be recognized as a
reduction of income tax expense. Additionally there is a
valuation allowance on capital losses of $3.2 million and
on state credits of $0.2 million. If our assumptions change
and we determine we will not be able to realize these NOLs
without a valuation allowance, the additional valuation
allowance will be accounted for as an increase in income tax
expense.
Changes in tax laws and rates could also affect recorded
deferred tax assets and liabilities in the future. Management is
not aware of any such changes that would have a material effect
on our results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws and
regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our global
operations.
In accordance with accounting standards for accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes, income tax positions must meet a
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date
to be recorded to the financial statement. The standards also
provide guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition.
We recognize tax and adjust tax liabilities when our judgment
changes as a result of the evaluation of new information not
previously available. Due to the complexity of some of these
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment
that is materially different from our current estimate of the
tax liabilities. An unfavorable tax settlement generally would
require use of our cash and may result in an increase in our
effective income tax rate in the period of resolution. A
favorable tax settlement may be recognized as a reduction in our
effective income tax rate in the period of resolution.
45
Our unrecognized tax benefits include exposure from not filing
in certain jurisdictions and transfer pricing exposure from
allocation of income between jurisdictions. We believe that
there is no reasonable possibility that an increase in
unrecognized tax benefits related to state exposures may be
necessary within fiscal 2010. In addition, we believe that none
of our currently remaining unrecognized tax positions will be
recognized by the end of fiscal 2010 as a result of a lapse of
the statute of limitations or settlements.
Fair
Value of Deferred Acquisition Payments
A substantial majority of our future acquisition payments relate
to RCI and are contingent upon RCI achieving specified minimum
earnings thresholds over one or more years. The determination of
the fair value of our deferred acquisition payments involves
certain judgments and estimates. These judgments can include,
but are not limited to, an estimate of the future performance of
our acquired entities, an estimate of the amount and timing of
the deferred acquisition payments and the discount rate used to
calculate the fair value of the payments. We utilize a
discounted cash flow model that incorporates several different
scenarios of future performance.
We assess the fair value of deferred acquisition payments for
changes at each reporting period, and any changes are recorded
as an increase or decrease to changes in fair value of deferred
acquisition payments on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. Changes in fair value can result from changes in our
assumptions regarding the amount and timing of payments as well
as changes in the discount rate. Our estimates of future
performance and payments may differ from actual performance and
payments due to, among other things, economic conditions,
changes to our business model, or changes in operating
performance of the acquired entities. Significant differences
between these estimates and actual performance could materially
affect the fair value of the deferred acquisition payments and
our future financial results. We also accrete the deferred
acquisition payment liability up to the estimated payment amount
over the earnout period using a risk-adjusted discount rate with
a corresponding charge recorded to changes in fair value of
deferred acquisition payments on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
As of January 2, 2010, the fair value of deferred
acquisition payments was $63.8 million. In fiscal 2009, the
fair value of the deferred acquisition payments increased by
$1.0 million which was recorded to changes in fair value of
deferred acquisition payments on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
If actual results are not consistent with our estimates and
assumptions, we may be exposed to a significant change in the
fair value of deferred acquisition payments.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies, to our consolidated financial statements included
in Item 15, Exhibits and Financial Statement
Schedule, of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 7A:
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
|
Our investment policy is to earn a market return consistent with
the safety of principal and the maintenance of adequate
liquidity at all times. We have not used derivative financial
instruments in our investment portfolio. Approved investments
include direct obligations of the U.S. Treasury, securities
explicitly backed by the full faith and credit of the
U.S. Government, money market mutual funds, so long as such
funds maintain a constant net asset value and provide daily
liquidity, and bank deposits. We protect and preserve our
invested funds by limiting default, market and reinvestment risk.
Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest
earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed
rate securities may have their fair market value adversely
impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate
securities may produce less income than expected if interest
rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment
income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest
rates or it may suffer losses in principal if we are forced to
sell securities which have declined in market value due to
changes in interest rates.
46
The following table provides information about our cash
equivalents, including principal cash flows by expected maturity
dates and the related weighted average interest rates as of the
end of fiscal 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the End of
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fiscal 2009
|
|
|
Money market mutual funds
|
|
$
|
13,606
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,606
|
|
|
$
|
13,606
|
|
Weighted average interest rate
|
|
|
0.002
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.002
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
13,606
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,606
|
|
|
$
|
13,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All securities have dates to maturity of less than one year.
In January 2008, we entered into a $75 million secured
revolving bank credit facility that matures in January 2013 with
a syndicate of banks. In May 2008, we expanded the credit
facility by $15 million thereby increasing the availability
to $90 million. Subject to certain conditions, the credit
facility may be increased to $150 million. We may elect to
have amounts outstanding under the secured revolving bank credit
facility bear interest at either a LIBOR rate plus an applicable
margin of 0.75% to 1.50%, the prime rate plus an applicable
margin of 0.75% to 1.50%, or at the Federal Funds Open Rate plus
0.5%. The applicable margin is determined by the leverage ratio
of funded debt to EBITDA, as defined in the secured revolving
credit facility. LIBOR is sensitive to changes in the general
level of U.S. interest rates. An immediate 100 basis
point increase in LIBOR would increase our annual interest
expense by approximately $0.1 million for every
$10 million borrowed under the line of credit. We had no
outstanding borrowings and had $6,552 of letters of credit under
the secured revolving bank credit facility as of January 2,
2010.
We transact business internationally and have market risk
arising from changes in foreign currency exchange rates relating
to our international operations. We do not manage our foreign
currency exchange rate risk through the use of any financial or
derivative instruments, forward contracts or hedging activities.
To date, international operations have not been material and we
believe that potential fluctuations in currency exchange rates
will not have a material effect on our financial position.
|
|
ITEM 8:
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
|
Our financial statements, supplementary data and related
documents that are included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are listed in Item 15(a), Part IV, of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 9:
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
|
Not applicable.
|
|
ITEM 9A:
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES.
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures. Our management, with the
participation of our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer, conducted an evaluation, as of
January 2, 2010, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(e).
Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and our
chief financial officer have concluded that, as of
January 2, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined in
Rule 13a-15(e),
were effective at the reasonable assurance level, to ensure that
(i) information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms and (ii) that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
our management including our principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
47
Changes in internal control over financial
reporting. We monitor and evaluate on an ongoing
basis our internal control over financial reporting in order to
improve its overall effectiveness. In the course of these
evaluations, we modify and refine our internal processes and
controls as conditions warrant. As required by
Rule 13a-15(d),
our management, including our chief executive officer and our
chief financial officer, also conducted an evaluation of our
internal control over financial reporting to determine whether
any changes occurred during the fiscal quarter ended
January 2, 2010 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has
been no such change during the quarter ended January 2,
2010.
Managements annual report on internal control over
financial reporting. Our management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in
Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(f).
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements due
to human error, or the improper circumvention or overriding of
internal controls. In addition, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions
and that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may change over time.
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive
officer and our chief financial officer, conducted an
evaluation, as of January 2, 2010, of the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting based on the
framework in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation
excluded our operations acquired through our acquisitions of
Silverlign Group, Inc. in April 2009, Pepperjam in September
2009 and RCI in November 2009. In aggregate, these acquisitions
accounted for 2% of our total assets and 3% of our net revenues
as of and for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2010.
Pursuant to guidance issued by the SEC, a company can exclude an
acquired businesss internal controls from
managements report on internal control over financial
reporting in the first year of acquisition if it is not possible
to conduct an assessment of an acquired businesss internal
control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation under
the framework in Internal Control Integrated
Framework, our management concluded that, as of
January 2, 2010, our internal control over financial
reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Our independent registered public accounting firm,
Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an attestation
report on our internal control over financial reporting. Their
report appears below.
48
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
GSI Commerce, Inc.
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
GSI Commerce, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of January 2, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. As described in Managements Annual Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded
from its assessment the internal control over financial
reporting at Silverlign Group, Inc. which was acquired on
April 6, 2009, Pepperjam, which was acquired on
September 1, 2009 and Retail Convergence, Inc., which was
acquired on November 17, 2009, and whose total assets and
net revenues constitute 2% and 3%, respectively, of the
consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the
fiscal year ended January 2, 2010. Accordingly, our audit
did not include the internal control over financial reporting at
Silverlign Group, Inc., Pepperjam and Retail Convergence, Inc.
The Companys management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of January 2, 2010, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule as of and for the fiscal year ended January 2,
2010 of the Company and our report dated March 5, 2010
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements
and financial statement schedule.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 5, 2010
49
|
|
ITEM 9B:
|
OTHER
INFORMATION.
|
On March 3, 2010, the Companys board of directors
approved a new form of indemnification agreement (the
Indemnification Agreement) for its directors and
officers and certain other employees (each, an
Indemnitee), which will replace the Companys
existing indemnification agreements. The Indemnification
Agreement provides for indemnification against liabilities
arising out of the Indemnitees performance of duties as
director, officer or employee. The Indemnification Agreement
provides indemnification in addition to the indemnification
provided by the Companys Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation, Amended and Restated Bylaws and applicable law
and indemnifies the Indemnitees for certain expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines and settlement amounts
actually and reasonably incurred by him in any action or
proceeding, including any action by or in the right of the
Company arising out of service to the Company or to any other
entity to which he provides services at the Companys
request. Further, the Company agrees to advance expenses the
Indemnitee may spend as a result of any proceeding as to which
the Indemnitee could be indemnified.
The foregoing descriptions of the Indemnification Agreement is a
general description only and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Indemnification Agreement, attached hereto as
Exhibit 10.11 and incorporated herein by reference.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10:
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
|
Information concerning our directors is incorporated by
reference to our 2010 Proxy Statement including, but not
necessarily limited to, the sections of the 2010 Proxy Statement
entitled Proposal 1 Election of
Directors and Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance.
Information concerning our executive officers is included in
Item 4.1, Executive Officers of the Registrant,
Part I, of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We have adopted a Finance Code of Professional Conduct that
applies to all of our Finance organization employees and our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The code is
available on our corporate Web site located at
www.gsicommerce.com. We intend to satisfy the disclosure
requirements under Item 5.05 on
Form 8-K
regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of its
Finance Code of Professional Conduct by posting such information
on our website at the location specified above.
|
|
ITEM 11:
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION.
|
This information is incorporated by reference to our 2010 Proxy
Statement including, but not necessarily limited to, the section
of the 2010 Proxy Statement entitled Executive
Compensation and Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation.
|
|
ITEM 12:
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|
This information is incorporated by reference to our 2010 Proxy
Statement including, but not necessarily limited to, the section
of the 2010 Proxy Statement entitled Beneficial Ownership
of Common Stock and Executive Compensation.
50
Equity
Compensation Plan Information as of the End of Fiscal
2009
The following table sets forth information regarding our
existing equity compensation plans as of the end of fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
to be Issued
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Listed in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders(1)
|
|
|
7,533,335
|
|
|
$
|
9.90
|
|
|
|
1,493,835
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,533,335
|
|
|
$
|
9.90
|
|
|
|
1,493,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These plans are the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2005
Equity Incentive Plan (the Plans). The 2005 Equity
Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock
options, nonstatutory stock options, stock appreciation rights,
stock purchase awards, stock bonus awards, stock unit awards,
restricted stock awards and other forms of equity compensation.
We have issued stock options, restricted stock units and
restricted stock awards under these Plans. These stock options
generally expire 10 years from the date of grant. The stock
options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards
generally vest over four years, although some restricted stock
units and restricted stock awards vest in less than four years.
Upon the occurrence of a change in control, certain awards will
immediately become exercisable in full. The weighted average
exercise price in the table above does not take these restricted
stock units and restricted stock awards into account. No future
awards will be granted pursuant to the 1996 Equity Incentive
Plan. |
|
|
ITEM 13:
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE.
|
This information is incorporated by reference to our 2010 Proxy
Statement including, but not necessarily limited to, the section
of the 2010 Proxy Statement entitled Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions and Board, Committees and
Attendance at Meetings of the Board and Committees.
|
|
ITEM 14:
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
|
This information is incorporated by reference to our 2010 Proxy
Statement including, but not necessarily limited to, the section
of the 2010 Proxy Statement entitled Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees.
51
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15:
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
|
|
|
(a)
|
1.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
2.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENT SCHEDULE
|
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Deductions*
|
|
|
End of Year
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
$
|
1,078
|
|
|
$
|
3,341
|
|
|
$
|
(2,586
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,833
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008
|
|
$
|
1,833
|
|
|
$
|
5,475
|
|
|
$
|
(4,561
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,747
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
$
|
2,747
|
|
|
$
|
6,477
|
|
|
$
|
(4,576
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,648
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Deductions include write-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
Charged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
|
(Credited) to
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
End of Year
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
$
|
115,381
|
|
|
$
|
(1,846
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,882
|
|
|
$
|
121,417
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008
|
|
$
|
121,417
|
|
|
$
|
2,463
|
|
|
$
|
(389
|
)
|
|
$
|
123,491
|
|
Fiscal Year 2009
|
|
$
|
123,491
|
|
|
$
|
3,122
|
|
|
$
|
31,347
|
|
|
$
|
157,960
|
|
All other schedules have been omitted since the required
information is included in the financial statements or the notes
thereto or is not applicable or required.
52
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 27, 2009,
by and among GSI Commerce, Inc, Cola Acquisition Corporation,
Retail Convergence, Inc., certain principal stockholders of
Retail Convergence, Inc. and William J. Fitzgerald (as
Stockholders Representative). The schedules and exhibits
to the merger agreement are omitted pursuant to
Item 601(b)(2) of
Regulation S-K.
GSI agrees to furnish supplementally to the SEC, upon request, a
copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit. (filed with GSI
Commerce, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
filed on November 17, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Global
Sports, Inc. (filed as Appendix B to GSI Commerce,
Inc.s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
filed on April 27, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Global Sports, Inc. (filed with GSI Commerce,
Inc.s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 29, 2002 and incorporated herein
by reference)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of GSI Commerce, Inc. (filed with
GSI Commerce, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (filed with
GSI Commerce, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 3, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate (filed with GSI Commerce,
Inc.s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the Quarter ended June 29, 2002 and incorporated herein
by reference)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 31, 1995, by and
between Global Sports, Inc. and MR Acquisitions, Inc. (filed
with GSI Commerce, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 31, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 17, 2009
between GSI Commerce, Inc. and the holders named therein (filed
with GSI Commerce, Inc.s Registration Statement on
Form S-3
dated November 18, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of April 3, 2006, between GSI
Commerce, Inc. and American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, as Rights Agent, including all exhibits
thereto (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on April 3, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Indenture dated as of June 1, 2005 by and between GSI
Commerce, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (filed with GSI
Commerce, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Form of 3% Convertible Note due 2025 (filed as
Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.1 of GSI Commerce, Inc.s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated June 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Indenture dated as of July 2, 2007 between the Company and
The Bank of New York, as trustee (filed with GSI Commerce,
Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 5, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Form of 2.50% Convertible Senior Note due 2027 (filed with
GSI Commerce, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 5, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
4
|
.9
|
|
Senior Indenture of GSI Commerce, Inc. with The Bank of New York
Mellon, as trustee (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s
Registration Statement on
Form S-3
dated November 18, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
4
|
.10
|
|
Subordinated Indenture of GSI Commerce, Inc. with The Bank of
New York Mellon, as trustee (filed with GSI Commerce,
Inc.s Registration Statement on
Form S-3
dated November 18, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.1+
|
|
GSI Commerce, Inc.s 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, amended
and restated as of March 5, 2008 (filed with GSI Commerce,
Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007 and
incorporated herein by reference)
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.2+
|
|
GSI Commerce, Inc.s 2005 Equity Incentive Plan as amended
(filed as Appendix A to GSI Commerce, Inc.s
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the
Securities Exchange Commission on April 25, 2008 and
incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
10
|
.3+
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice (Basic) Under the GSI
Commerce, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (filed with GSI
Commerce, Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.4+
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice Issued to Directors
Under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (Annual Award) (filed with
GSI Commerce, Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.5+
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice Issued to Directors
Under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (Initial Election Award)
(filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.6+
|
|
Stock Option Grant Notice (Basic) Under the 2005 Equity
Incentive Plan (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 15, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.7+
|
|
Stock Option Grant Notice (Alternate) Under the 2005 Equity
Incentive Plan (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 15, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.8+
|
|
GSI Commerce, Inc. Leadership Team Incentive Plan (filed as from
Appendix B to GSI Commerce, Inc.s Definitive Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities
Exchange Commission on April 25, 2008 and incorporated
herein by reference)
|
|
10
|
.9+
|
|
Leadership Team Deferral Plan, as amended and restated effective
March 5, 2008 (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2007 and
incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
10
|
.10+
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement (filed with GSI Commerce,
Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.11+
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
|
|
10
|
.12+
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated August 23, 2006, by and between
GSI Commerce, Inc. and Michael G. Rubin (filed with GSI
Commerce, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on August 29, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.13+
|
|
Amendment
2008-1 to
the Employment Agreement between GSI Commerce, Inc. and Michael
G. Rubin, dated as of December 30, 2008 (filed with GSI
Commerce, Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.14+
|
|
Michael Rubin Form of PRSU Agreement (filed with GSI Commerce,
Inc.s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended April 4, 2009 and incorporated herein
by reference)
|
|
10
|
.15+
|
|
Michael Rubin Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (filed
with GSI Commerce, Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 16, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
10
|
.16+
|
|
Offer Letter, dated January 31, 2005, between GSI Commerce,
Inc. and Stephen J. Gold (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
on February 2, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
10
|
.17+
|
|
Amendment, dated July 31, 2009, to Offer Letter, dated
January 31, 2005, between GSI Commerce, Inc. and Stephen J.
Gold (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K
on August 6, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
10
|
.18+
|
|
Offer Letter, dated March 26, 2007, between GSI Commerce,
Inc. and Scott Hardy (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 29, 2008 and incorporated
herein by reference)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Promissory Note from 935 HQ Associates, LLC to CIBC Inc. dated
June 9, 2004 (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 3, 2004 and incorporated herein
by reference)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Mortgage, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Security Agreement
from 935 HQ Associates, LLC in favor of CIBC Inc. dated as of
June 9, 2004 (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended July 3, 2004 and incorporated herein
by reference)
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of January 11, 2008, by and
among GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc., the Guarantors named
therein, the Lenders named therein, PNC Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent, and Bank of America, N.A.,
as syndication agent (filed with GSI Commerce, Inc.s
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 17, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed
Charges
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney, incorporated by reference to the signature
page of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
|
|
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portions
of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf on the date indicated by
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: March 5, 2010
GSI COMMERCE, INC.
Michael G Rubin
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
POWER OF
ATTORNEY AND SIGNATURES
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Michael G.
Rubin and Michael R. Conn, and each or any one of them, his true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments to this
Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to
be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of
them, or their or his substitutes or substitute, may lawfully do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title(s)
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
G. Rubin
Michael
G. Rubin
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer)
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
R. Conn
Michael
R. Conn
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ M.
Jeffrey Branman
M.
Jeffrey Branman
|
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
Donahue
Michael
Donahue
|
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald
D. Fisher
Ronald
D. Fisher
|
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
A. Hunter
John
A. Hunter
|
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title(s)
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark
S. Menell
Mark
S. Menell
|
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey
F. Rayport
Jeffrey
F. Rayport
|
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lawrence
S. Smith
Lawrence
S. Smith
|
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Andrea
M. Weiss
Andrea
M. Weiss
|
|
Director
|
|
March 5, 2010
|
57
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
GSI Commerce, Inc.
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
GSI Commerce, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
fiscal years in the period ended January 2, 2010. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in
the Index at Item 15(a) 2. These financial statements and
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of GSI Commerce, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
January 2, 2010 and January 3, 2009, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
fiscal years in the period ended January 2, 2010, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
January 2, 2010, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission and our report dated March 5, 2010 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte &
Touche LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 5, 2010
F-1
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
130,315
|
|
|
$
|
228,430
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,747 and $4,648
|
|
|
78,544
|
|
|
|
70,582
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
42,856
|
|
|
|
55,678
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
12,347
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
11,229
|
|
|
|
13,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
281,069
|
|
|
|
380,224
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
164,833
|
|
|
|
163,329
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
194,996
|
|
|
|
373,003
|
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $18,340
and $29,172
|
|
|
46,663
|
|
|
|
132,875
|
|
Long-term deferred tax assets
|
|
|
11,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $16,384 and
$17,264
|
|
|
17,168
|
|
|
|
12,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
716,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
98,100
|
|
|
$
|
126,914
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
116,747
|
|
|
|
150,173
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
20,397
|
|
|
|
20,645
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,443
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
4,887
|
|
|
|
5,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
240,131
|
|
|
|
358,435
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
161,951
|
|
|
|
116,948
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
32,609
|
|
|
|
28,142
|
|
Deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,763
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,534
|
|
Deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
6,838
|
|
|
|
9,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
441,529
|
|
|
|
585,508
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares
authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding as of
January 3, 2009 and January 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 90,000,000 shares
authorized; 47,630,824 and 60,033,393 shares issued as of
January 3, 2009 and January 2, 2010 respectively;
47,630,621 and 60,033,190 shares outstanding as of
January 3, 2009 and January 2, 2010, respectively
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
430,933
|
|
|
|
642,852
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,327
|
)
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(154,586
|
)
|
|
|
(165,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
274,496
|
|
|
|
476,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
716,025
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-2
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues from product sales
|
|
$
|
512,194
|
|
|
$
|
577,073
|
|
|
$
|
542,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service fee revenues
|
|
|
237,763
|
|
|
|
389,853
|
|
|
|
461,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
|
749,957
|
|
|
|
966,926
|
|
|
|
1,004,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues from product sales
|
|
|
356,541
|
|
|
|
405,254
|
|
|
|
398,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
64,573
|
|
|
|
70,282
|
|
|
|
54,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account management and operations, inclusive of $3,241 $7,505
and $9,028 of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
177,473
|
|
|
|
260,325
|
|
|
|
273,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development, inclusive of $1,749 $4,118 and $5,740 of
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
66,032
|
|
|
|
104,208
|
|
|
|
120,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative, inclusive of $4,052 $7,780 and
$9,994 of stock-based compensation
|
|
|
43,682
|
|
|
|
68,964
|
|
|
|
82,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
37,337
|
|
|
|
68,153
|
|
|
|
63,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
745,638
|
|
|
|
977,186
|
|
|
|
993,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
4,319
|
|
|
|
(10,260
|
)
|
|
|
10,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
12,191
|
|
|
|
18,841
|
|
|
|
19,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(9,270
|
)
|
|
|
(1,772
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
5,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
8,165
|
|
|
|
20,296
|
|
|
|
18,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,846
|
)
|
|
|
(30,556
|
)
|
|
|
(8,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(2,887
|
)
|
|
|
(7,585
|
)
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(959
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,971
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share- basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted
|
|
|
46,433
|
|
|
|
47,347
|
|
|
|
51,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-3
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated balance at December 30, 2006
|
|
|
45,879
|
|
|
$
|
458
|
|
|
$
|
366,073
|
|
|
$
|
(130,656
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(97
|
)
|
|
$
|
235,778
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(959
|
)
|
Net unrealized gain on
available-
for-sale
securities, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Add: Reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,018
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,028
|
|
Issuance of convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,783
|
|
Issuance of common stock and warrants upon exercise of options
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,080
|
|
Issuance of stock awards upon vesting
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based awards retained for taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
Tax benefit in connection with exercise of stock options and
awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated balance at December 29, 2007
|
|
|
46,848
|
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
412,203
|
|
|
$
|
(131,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(156
|
)
|
|
$
|
280,900
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,971
|
)
|
|
|
(22,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,971
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,171
|
)
|
|
|
(2,171
|
)
|
|
|
(2,171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(25,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,494
|
|
Issuance of common stock and warrants upon exercise of options
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
Issuance of stock awards upon vesting
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based awards retained for taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
Tax deficit in connection with exercise of stock options and
awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated balance at January 3, 2009
|
|
|
47,631
|
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
|
$
|
430,933
|
|
|
$
|
(154,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,327
|
)
|
|
$
|
274,496
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,028
|
)
|
|
|
(11,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,028
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(10,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,749
|
|
Issuance of common stock and warrants upon exercise of options
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
Issuance of stock awards upon vesting
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based awards retained for taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
Tax benefit in connection with exercise of stock options and
awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
Acquisition consideration
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
93,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,945
|
|
Common stock issued in public offering, net of costs
|
|
|
5,464
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
87,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated balance at January 2, 2010
|
|
|
60,033
|
|
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
$
|
642,852
|
|
|
$
|
(165,614
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
$
|
476,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-4
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(959
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,971
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,028
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
32,763
|
|
|
|
54,557
|
|
|
|
52,633
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
4,574
|
|
|
|
13,596
|
|
|
|
10,762
|
|
Amortization of discount on convertible notes
|
|
|
6,542
|
|
|
|
9,462
|
|
|
|
10,440
|
|
Changes in fair value of deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
19,403
|
|
|
|
24,762
|
|
Foreign currency transaction losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Loss on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
5,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of equipment
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(3,305
|
)
|
|
|
(7,722
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(7,005
|
)
|
|
|
(8,130
|
)
|
|
|
10,010
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
7,677
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(2,265
|
)
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
7,633
|
|
|
|
23,513
|
|
|
|
33,967
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
|
|
3,076
|
|
|
|
(1,771
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
58,134
|
|
|
|
95,969
|
|
|
|
140,224
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(100,574
|
)
|
|
|
(145,001
|
)
|
|
|
(88,892
|
)
|
Cash paid for property and equipment, including internal use
software
|
|
|
(54,196
|
)
|
|
|
(57,180
|
)
|
|
|
(43,007
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposition of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of restricted cash escrow funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
Cash paid for equity investments
|
|
|
(3,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(263,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of marketable securities
|
|
|
371,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(50,277
|
)
|
|
|
(200,681
|
)
|
|
|
(130,847
|
)
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from convertible notes
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on revolving credit loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on revolving credit loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,596
|
|
Proceeds from capital lease financing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity issuance costs paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,728
|
)
|
Debt issuance costs paid
|
|
|
(5,042
|
)
|
|
|
(561
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(935
|
)
|
|
|
(3,032
|
)
|
|
|
(4,503
|
)
|
Repayments of mortgage note
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
Excess tax benefit in connection with exercise of stock options
and awards
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options and warrants
|
|
|
8,080
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
152,280
|
|
|
|
5,512
|
|
|
|
88,593
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,996
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
160,129
|
|
|
|
(101,196
|
)
|
|
|
98,115
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
71,382
|
|
|
|
231,511
|
|
|
|
130,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
231,511
|
|
|
$
|
130,315
|
|
|
$
|
228,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
$
|
5,622
|
|
|
$
|
9,798
|
|
|
$
|
8,055
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
3,032
|
|
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrual for purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
2,943
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
2,363
|
|
Equipment financed under capital lease
|
|
|
15,562
|
|
|
|
2,497
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
F-5
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
NOTE 1
|
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
|
GSI Commerce, Inc. (GSI or the Company),
a Delaware corporation, is a leading provider of
e-commerce
and interactive marketing services to large businesses that sell
products directly to consumers (b2c). The Company has three
reportable segments
e-commerce
services, interactive marketing services and consumer
engagement. Through the Companys
e-commerce
services, it delivers customized solutions to its clients
through an
e-commerce
platform, which is comprised of three components: technology,
fulfillment and customer care. The Company offers each of the
platforms components on a modular basis, or as part of an
integrated,
end-to-end
solution. Through the Companys interactive marketing
services, it offers comprehensive digital and traditional agency
and e-mail
marketing services that include brand development and strategic
account planning, user experience and creative design,
interactive marketing, traditional advertising, media buying,
video, marketing content and promotional development,
e-mail
marketing and distribution, Web store usability, and photography
and content development. Through consumer engagement, the
Company offers retailers and brands an online platform to sell
excess inventory in the private sales channel as well as in the
off-price marketplace.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
The following summarize the Companys significant
accounting policies:
Fiscal Year: The Companys fiscal year
ends on the Saturday closest to December 31. The fiscal
year is named for the calendar year ending on that
December 31. Fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2009 each included
52 weeks, and fiscal 2008 included 53 weeks.
Basis of Consolidation: The financial
statements presented include the accounts of the Company and all
wholly owned subsidiaries. Inter-company balances and
transactions among consolidated entities have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates and
assumptions.
Fair Values: The carrying amount of cash and
cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables
approximates their fair values due to their short-term maturity.
See Note 3, Fair Value of Financial and Nonfinancial
Instruments, for information related to the fair value of
the Companys financial and nonfinancial instruments and
items required to be remeasured at fair value on a recurring
basis.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash primarily
consists of bank deposits. Cash equivalents primarily consist of
money market mutual funds. All investments with an original
maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.
Inventory: Inventory is valued at the lower of
cost (determined using the weighted average method) or market.
Inherent in this valuation are significant management judgments
and estimates, including among others, assessments concerning
obsolescence and shrinkage rates. Based upon these judgments and
estimates, which are applied consistently from period to period,
the Company records a valuation adjustment to adjust the
carrying amount of its inventory.
The Companys obsolescence reserve represents the excess of
the carrying value over the amount it expects to realize from
the ultimate sale or other disposal of the inventory. The
obsolescence reserve establishes a new cost basis for the
Companys inventory. Subsequent changes in facts or
circumstances do not result in the reversal of previously
recorded reserves or an increase in that newly established cost
basis.
F-6
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
The Companys shrinkage loss reserve represents estimated
physical inventory losses (e.g., theft or damages) that have
occurred since the last inventory count date. Inventory counts
are taken on a regular basis to ensure that the inventory
reported in the Companys consolidated financial statements
are accurately stated. During the interim period between
inventory counts, the Company reserves for anticipated physical
inventory losses.
The Company also provides fulfillment-related services for
certain of its clients in which its clients maintain ownership
of the related products. As such, the related inventory is not
reported in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Property and Equipment: Property and equipment
are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation or
amortization. The Company capitalizes costs incurred during the
application development stage related to the development of
internal-use software and amortizes these costs over the
estimated useful life of four years. Depreciation or
amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, which are:
|
|
|
|
|
Three to six years for office equipment;
|
|
|
|
Three to four years for computer hardware and software including
internal use software;
|
|
|
|
Seven years for furniture and fulfillment center equipment;
|
|
|
|
The lesser of fifteen years or lease term for leasehold
improvements;
|
|
|
|
Fifteen years for building improvements; and
|
|
|
|
Thirty years for buildings.
|
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as
incurred. Major renewals or replacements that substantially
extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: Goodwill
is measured as the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the
sum of the amounts assigned to tangible and intangible assets
acquired less liabilities assumed. The determination of the fair
value of the intangible assets acquired involves certain
judgments and estimates. These judgments can include, but are
not limited to, the cash flows that an asset is expected to
generate in the future and the appropriate weighted average cost
of capital.
The Company does not amortize goodwill or indefinite-lived
intangible assets but performs tests for impairment annually, or
when indications of potential impairment exist, utilizing a fair
value approach at the reporting unit level. The Company
determines fair value using widely accepted valuation
techniques, including the income approach which estimates the
fair value of its reporting units based on the future discounted
cash flows, and the market approach which estimates the fair
value of its reporting units based on comparable market prices.
In testing for a potential impairment of goodwill, the Company
estimates the fair value of its reporting units to which
goodwill relates and determines the carrying value (book value)
of the assets and liabilities related to those businesses.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company completed its
annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible assets and determined there was no impairment.
The Company amortizes other intangible assets with determinable
lives over their estimated useful lives. The Company records an
impairment charge on these assets when it determines that their
carrying value may not be recoverable. The carrying value is not
recoverable if it exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows
resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition. When there is existence of one or more indicators
of impairment, the Company measures any impairment of intangible
assets based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a
discount rate determined by the Companys management to be
commensurate with the risk inherent in its business
F-7
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
model. The Companys estimates of future cash flows
attributable to its other intangible assets require significant
judgment based on the Companys historical and anticipated
results and are subject to many factors.
See Note 5, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,
for more information about goodwill and other intangible assets.
Long-Lived Assets: The Company reviews
long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Impairment exists when the sum of undiscounted
estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of
the asset is less than the assets carrying value. If an
impairment exists, an impairment loss is recognized for the
difference between the assets carrying value and its
estimated fair value. When an impairment loss is recognized, the
carrying amount of the asset is reduced to its estimated fair
value based on quoted market prices or other valuation
techniques.
Other Assets, Net:
The following table summarizes our other assets as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Equity investments
|
|
$
|
5,374
|
|
|
$
|
3,420
|
|
Unamortized debt issuance costs
|
|
|
3,835
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
Deferred client revenue share charges
|
|
|
3,677
|
|
|
|
2,247
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets, net
|
|
$
|
17,168
|
|
|
$
|
12,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys equity investments represent cost method
investments in private companies. Unamortized debt issuance
costs are primarily attributable to the Companys July 2007
offering of $150,000 aggregate subordinated convertible notes,
and is amortized using the effective interest method over a
weighted average remaining amortization period of 4.5 years
into interest expense. Deferred client revenue share charges are
being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term
of the related contracts. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009,
the Company expensed approximately $1,300 of deferred
acquisition costs related to a terminated agreement.
Accrued Expenses: Accrued expenses include
$62,705 of amounts payable to the Companys clients and
accrued payroll of $25,617 as of the end of fiscal 2009. No
other individual balance was greater than 5% of total current
liabilities as of January 2, 2010.
Accrued expenses include $55,573 of amounts payable to the
Companys clients, accrued payroll of $15,931, and
marketing accruals of $12,368 as of the end of fiscal 2008. No
other individual balance was greater than 5% of total current
liabilities as of January 3, 2009.
Deferred Acquisition Payments: Deferred
acquisition payments consist of the Companys estimate of
the fair value of future acquisition payments. The Company
determines the fair value of the deferred acquisition payments
by utilizing discounted cash flow models that incorporate
several different assumptions of future performance. The
liability is accreted up to the estimated payment amount over
the earnout period using a risk-adjusted discount rate with a
corresponding charge recorded to changes in fair value of
deferred acquisition payments on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. In addition to accreting up the liability based on
the passage of time, the fair value of deferred acquisition
payments is also assessed for changes at each reporting period
with any changes recorded as an increase or decrease to changes
in fair value of deferred acquisition payments on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
F-8
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
As of January 2, 2010, the Companys fair value of
deferred acquisition payments was $63,763. The Companys
accretion of the liability to fair value was $951 in fiscal 2009
and was recorded to changes in fair value of deferred
acquisition payments on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes
revenues when the following revenue recognition criteria are
met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred, the selling price is fixed or determinable and
collectability is reasonably assured.
For the Companys fulfillment and drop-shipping services,
when the Company is the primary obligor in a transaction, has
general inventory risk, has established the selling price, has
discretion in supplier selection and has credit risk, or have
several but not all of these indicators, it records revenue on a
gross basis as a principal and records these revenues as
revenues from product sales. When the Company does not have
several or all of these factors, it records the commission or
fee retained as service fee revenue. Revenue generated from the
Companys customer care, interactive marketing and
technology services are also recorded as service fees.
Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into
separate units of accounting if the deliverables in the
arrangement meet the following criteria: the delivered item has
value to the customer on a standalone basis, there is objective
and reliable evidence of the fair value of undelivered items and
delivery of any undelivered item is probable and substantially
in the Companys control.
Net Revenues from Product Sales: The Company
recognizes revenue from product sales, which includes shipping
revenue and excludes sales tax, for all Web stores that it
provides fulfillment services, net of estimated returns based on
historical experience and current trends. The Company recognizes
revenue when title and risk of ownership passes to the consumer
either upon shipment of products to customers or upon receipt of
products to customers based on the terms and conditions. The
majority of product sales are shipped from the Companys
fulfillment centers. The Company also relies upon certain
vendors to ship products directly to customers on its behalf.
The Company acts as principal in these transactions, as orders
are initiated directly through the
e-commerce
businesses that it operates, because the Company has inventory
risk, establishes selling prices, takes title to the goods at
the shipping point and has the economic risk related to
collection, customer care and returns.
The Company pays a percentage of the revenues generated from
product sales through the
e-commerce
businesses that it operates to its respective clients in
exchange for the rights to use their brand names and the
promotions and advertising that its clients agree to provide.
The Company refers to these payments as client revenue share
expenses. The Company has considered the revenue reduction
accounting provisions, and believes that the payment of client
revenue share expense to its clients should not result in any
reduction of revenues. The Company purchases merchandise from
its vendors, at its discretion, and is responsible for paying
those vendors. The amounts purchased and the prices paid to the
Companys vendors are not in any way impacted by the
revenue share provisions of its agreements with its clients.
Accordingly, the Companys clients and its vendors are not
linked in the distribution chain and it believes that the
provisions of this standard do not apply.
Service Fee Revenues: Services fees are
generated based on a clients use of one or more of the
Companys
e-commerce
platform components or elements of those components, which
include technology, fulfillment and customer care. Service fees
are also generated from professional, technology and interactive
marketing services. Service fees can be fixed or variable and
are based on the activity performed, the value of merchandise
sold, or the gross profit from a transaction. For transactions
in which the Company is deemed to be the agent, rather than the
principal, the Company records service fee revenue based on the
net fee retained.
The Company does not specifically record cost of service
fee revenues as these costs are incurred by its service
fee-based clients rather than by the Company. Operating expenses
relating to service fee revenues consist primarily of personnel
and other costs associated with the Companys engineering,
production and creative departments which are included in
product development expense, as well as fulfillment costs and
personnel and
F-9
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
other costs associated with its marketing and customer care
departments which are included in account management and
operations on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For Web stores for which the Company owns the inventory and
records revenue as product sales in its
e-commerce
and consumer engagement segments, the Company sells gift cards
to its customers through its clients Web stores and
through selected third parties. The Company recognizes income
from gift cards when: (i) the gift card is redeemed by the
customer; or (ii) the likelihood of the gift card being
redeemed by the customer is remote and the Company determines
that it does not have a legal obligation to remit the value of
unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions (gift
card breakage). Based on historical redemption patterns,
the likelihood of a gift card remaining unredeemed can be
determined 24 months after the gift card is issued. At that
time, the Company recognizes breakage income for those cards for
which the likelihood of redemption is deemed to be remote and
the Company does not have a legal obligation to remit the value
of the unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdiction. Gift
card breakage income is included in service fee revenues in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Fiscal 2008 was the first year in which the Company obtained
sufficient historical redemption data for its gift card program
to make a reasonable estimate of the ultimate redemption
patterns and breakage rates and began recognizing gift card
breakage income. In fiscal 2009, the Company recognized $2,314
of gift card breakage income. In fiscal 2008, the Company
recognized $2,974 of gift card breakage income, of which $1,649
would have been recorded prior to fiscal 2008 had the Company
began recognizing gift card breakage income prior to fiscal 2008.
The Companys deferred revenue consists of unredeemed sales
of gift cards, as well as payments received for service fees in
advance of the delivery of the Companys service
obligation. For service fees received in advance, revenue is
recognized either over the service period or upon completion of
the Companys obligation.
Cost of Revenues from Product Sales: Cost of
revenues from product sales include the cost of products sold
and inbound freight related to these products, as well as
outbound shipping and handling costs, other than those related
to promotional free shipping and subsidized shipping and
handling which are included in marketing expense in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company does not
record cost of service fee revenue because the Company is deemed
to be an agent, rather than the principal.
Costs of revenues from product sales consist primarily of direct
costs associated with (i) products we sell through our
clients Web stores, (ii) products we sell through the Web
stores in our consumer engagement segment, and (iii) our
shipping charges for all Web stores for which we provide
fulfillment services. Costs of revenues from product sales were
attributable to our
e-commerce
services and consumer engagement segments.
Vendor Allowances: The Company has agreements
to receive funds from certain of its vendors, including rebates
and cooperative marketing reimbursements. The Company has
agreements with vendors setting forth the specific conditions
for each allowance or payment. Vendor allowances are recorded as
a reduction in the cost of the applicable vendors products
and recognized in cost of revenues from product sales when the
related product is sold unless the allowances represent
reimbursement of a specific incremental and identifiable cost
incurred to promote the vendors product. If the allowance
represents a reimbursement of cost, it is recorded as an offset
to the associated expense incurred. Any reimbursement greater
than the costs incurred is recognized as a reduction in the cost
of the product.
Marketing: Marketing expenses include client
revenue share charges, net advertising and promotional expenses
incurred by the Company in operating its clients
e-commerce
businesses and its consumer engagement Web stores, subsidized
shipping and handling costs and catalog costs.
Client revenue share charges are payments made to the
Companys clients in exchange for the use of their brand
names, logos, the promotion of its clients URLs, Web
stores and toll-free telephone numbers in clients
F-10
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
marketing and communications materials, the implementation of
programs to provide incentives to consumers to shop through the
e-commerce
businesses that the Company operates for its clients and other
programs and services provided to the consumers of the
e-commerce
businesses that the Company operates for its clients, net of
amounts reimbursed to the Company by its clients. Client revenue
share is calculated as either a percentage of product sales or a
guaranteed annual amount. Client revenue share charges were
$34,233 for fiscal 2009, $41,796 for fiscal 2008 and $35,297 for
fiscal 2007.
The Company expenses the cost of advertising, which includes
online marketing fees, media, agency and production expenses.
Advertising production costs are expensed the first time the
advertisement runs. Online marketing fees and media (television,
radio and print) placement costs are expensed in the month the
advertising appears. Agency fees are expensed as incurred.
Advertising and promotional expenses are recorded net of amounts
reimbursed to the Company by its clients. Advertising costs were
$15,684 for fiscal 2009, $19,750 for fiscal 2008 and $19,285 for
fiscal 2007.
The Company defines shipping and handling costs as only those
costs incurred for a third-party shipper to transport products
to consumers and these costs are included in cost of revenues
from product sales to the extent the costs are less than or
equal to shipping revenue. In some instances, shipping and
handling costs exceed shipping charges to the consumer and are
subsidized by the Company. Additionally, the Company selectively
offers promotional free shipping whereby it ships merchandise to
consumers free of all shipping and handling charges. The cost of
promotional, free, and subsidized shipping and handling was $0
for fiscal 2009, $4,009 for fiscal 2008 and $5,908 for fiscal
2007.
Catalog costs consist primarily of creative design, paper,
printing, postage and mailing costs, which are capitalized and
amortized over the expected future revenue stream, which is
generally a period not exceeding six months. The Company
amortizes capitalized advertising costs per the ratio of actual
revenues to the total of actual and estimated future revenues on
an individual catalog basis. Deferred catalog costs included in
prepaid expenses and other current assets were $692 as of
January 2, 2010 and $613 as of January 3, 2009.
Catalog costs were $5,470 for fiscal 2009, $5,222 for fiscal
2008 and $4,263 for fiscal 2007.
Account Management and Operations: Account
management and operations expenses include fulfillment costs,
customer care costs, credit card fees, and payroll related to
the buying, business management and marketing functions of the
Company.
The Company defines fulfillment costs as personnel, occupancy
and other costs associated with its fulfillment centers,
personnel and other costs associated with its logistical support
and vendor operations departments and third-party warehouse and
fulfillment services costs. Fulfillment costs were $92,663 for
fiscal 2009, $100,131 for fiscal 2008 and $72,624 for fiscal
2007.
Product Development: Product development
expenses consist primarily of expenses associated with planning,
maintaining and operating the technology platform on which the
Company operates
e-commerce
businesses, and payroll and related expenses for the
Companys engineering, production, creative and management
information systems departments. Cost incurred to develop
internal-use software is capitalized during the application
development stage. Costs incurred relating to planning and
training or maintenance of internal-use software is expensed as
incurred.
General and Administrative: General and
administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related
expenses for executive, finance, human resources, legal, sales
and administrative personnel, as well as bad debt expense and
occupancy costs for the Companys headquarters and other
offices.
Foreign Currency Translation and
Transactions: The functional currency of the
Companys foreign operations is the applicable local
currency. The functional currency is translated into
U.S. dollars for balance sheet accounts using current
exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date and for
revenue and expense accounts
F-11
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
using a weighted-average exchange rate during the period. The
translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of
stockholders equity, captioned accumulated other
comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Cumulative translation adjustments included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were
$1,498 as of January 2, 2010 and $2,327 as of
January 3, 2009. Losses resulting from transactions
denominated in currencies other than the functional currencies
were $14 for fiscal 2009, $1,571 for fiscal 2008 and $329 for
fiscal 2007, and are included in other expense, net on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Stock-Based Compensation: The Company measures
compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on
the date of grant and recognition of compensation expense over
the service period during which awards are expected to vest. The
fair value of restricted stock awards and restricted stock units
is determined based on the number of shares granted and the
quoted price of the Companys common stock and the fair
value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes
valuation model. Such value is recognized as expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period, net of
estimated forfeitures. The estimation of the number of stock
awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the
extent actual results or updated estimates differ from the
Companys current estimates, such amounts will be recorded
as a cumulative adjustment in the period in which estimates are
revised. The Company considers many factors when estimating
expected forfeitures, including types of awards, employee class
and historical experience. During each of fiscal 2009, fiscal
2008 and fiscal 2007, the Company recalculated its projected
forfeiture rate as it applies to stock-based compensation based
on historical data. For fiscal 2009, the impact of the change in
estimate for the change in forfeiture rate increased costs and
expenses and increased net loss by $512, which increased both
basic and diluted loss per share by $0.01. For fiscal 2008 the
impact of the change in estimate for the change in forfeiture
rate increased costs and expenses and increased net loss by
$784, which increased both basic and diluted loss per share by
$0.02. For fiscal 2007 the impact of the change in estimate for
the change in forfeiture rate increased costs and expenses and
decreased net income by $495, which decreased both basic and
diluted earnings per share by $0.01.
See Note 10, Stock Awards, for more information
about stock-based compensation.
Income Taxes: The Company recognizes deferred
tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the
financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the
Companys assets and liabilities and expected benefits of
utilizing net operating loss carryforwards. The impact on
deferred taxes of changes in tax rates and laws, if any, applied
to the years during which temporary differences are expected to
be settled, is reflected in the consolidated financial
statements in the period of enactment.
The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent it
believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In
making such determination, the Company considers all available
positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of
existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable
income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations.
In the event the Company determines it would be able to realize
its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their
recorded amount, the Company would make an adjustment to the
valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income
taxes.
The Company does not provide for U.S. taxes on its
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries since it intends
to invest such undistributed earnings indefinitely outside of
the U.S. If such amounts were repatriated, the amount of
U.S. income taxes would be immaterial.
The Company recognizes a tax benefit from an uncertain tax
position only if it is more likely than not that the
position is sustainable upon examination, including resolutions
of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on its
technical merits. The tax benefit of a qualifying position is
the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50%
likely of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority
having full knowledge of all relevant information. The liability
for unrecognized tax benefits is classified as noncurrent unless
the liability is expected to be settled in cash within
12 months of the reporting date. The Company records any
estimated interest or penalties
F-12
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
from the uncertain tax position as income tax expense. The
Company adopted this standard effective December 31, 2006,
the first day of its fiscal 2007. As a result of the
implementation, the Company recognized no increase in the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
The following is a summary of recent accounting standards issued
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Date for
|
Subject
|
|
Date Issued
|
|
Summary
|
|
Effect of Adoption
|
|
the Company
|
|
Effective Date of Fair Value Measurements
|
|
February 2008
|
|
Delayed the effective date of previously issued accounting
standards for Fair Value Measurements of
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring
basis, at least annually, until fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
|
|
No material impact.
|
|
January 4, 2009
|
Business Combinations
|
|
December 2007
|
|
Establishes principles and requirements for an acquirer in a
business combination for recognizing and measuring the
identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any
noncontrolling interest in the entity acquired in its financial
statements. Provides guidance on the recognition and measurement
of goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from
a bargain purchase as well as what information to disclose to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature
and financial impact of the business combination. Also, requires
recognition of assets and liabilities of noncontrolling
interests acquired, fair value measurement of consideration and
contingent consideration, expense recognition for transaction
costs and certain integration costs, recognition of the fair
value of contingencies, and adjustments to income tax expense
for changes in an acquirers existing valuation allowances
or uncertain tax positions that result from the business
combination.
|
|
No material impact.
|
|
January 4, 2009
|
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidating Financial Statements
|
|
December 2007
|
|
Establishes principles and requirements of treatment for the
portion of equity in a subsidiary that is not attributable
directly or indirectly to a parent. This is commonly known as a
minority interest. The objective is to improve relevance,
comparability, and transparency concerning ownership interests
in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent by
providing disclosures that clearly identify between interests of
the parent and interest of the noncontrolling owners and the
related impacts on the consolidated statement of income and the
consolidated statement of financial position. Also provides
guidance on disclosures related to changes in the parents
ownership interest and deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
|
|
No material impact.
|
|
January 4, 2009
|
F-13
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Date for
|
Subject
|
|
Date Issued
|
|
Summary
|
|
Effect of Adoption
|
|
the Company
|
|
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Requires companies with derivative instruments to disclose how
and why a company uses derivative instruments, how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
accounting standards for Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect a companys
financial statements.
|
|
No material impact.
|
|
January 4, 2009
|
Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon
Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)
|
|
May 2008
|
|
Changes the accounting treatment for convertible debt
instruments that allow for either mandatory or optional cash
settlements. Requires the issuer of convertible debt instruments
with cash settlement features to separately account for the
liability and equity components of the instrument. The
Companys $207,500 principal amount of subordinated
convertible notes are subject to the provisions of these
standards because under the notes the Company has the ability to
elect cash settlement of the conversion value of the notes. The
provisions require retrospective application.
|
|
The Company retrospecively applied this standard to all periods
presented. See the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on August 4, 2009
for the impact of this standard on the Companys previously
reported financial statements.
|
|
January 4, 2009
|
Determining whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is
indexed to an Entitys Own Stock
|
|
June 2008
|
|
Provides a two-step model to be applied in determining whether a
financial instrument or an embedded feature is indexed to an
issuers own stock and thus able to qualify for the scope
exception under accounting standards of Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
|
|
No material impact.
|
|
January 4, 2009
|
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions are Participating Securities
|
|
June 2008
|
|
Requires that unvested stock-based compensation awards that
contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend
equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) should be classified as
participating securities and should be included in the
computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class
method as described in accounting standards for Earnings
Per Share.
|
|
No material impact.
|
|
January 4, 2009
|
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
|
April 2009
|
|
Requires companies to disclose in interim financial statements
the fair value of financial instruments within the scope of
accounting standards for Disclosures About Fair Value of
Financial Instruments. Also requires that companies
disclose the method or methods and significant assumptions used
to estimate the fair value of financial instruments.
|
|
No material impact.
|
|
July 4, 2009
|
Subsequent Events
|
|
May 2009, Amended February 2010
|
|
Sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which
management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under
which an entity should recognize events or transactions
occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about
events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet
date.
|
|
No material impact.
|
|
July 4, 2009
|
F-14
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Date for
|
Subject
|
|
Date Issued
|
|
Summary
|
|
Effect of Adoption
|
|
the Company
|
|
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
|
|
June 2009
|
|
Identifies the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the
authoritative source of generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States. Rules and interpretive releases of the
Securities and Exchange Commission under federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
|
|
No material impact.
|
|
July 5, 2009
|
Multiple Element Arrangements
|
|
October 2009
|
|
Removes the objective-and-reliable-evidence-of-fair-value
criterion from the separation criteria used to determine whether
an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more
than one unit of accounting. Replaces references to fair
value with selling price to distinguish from
the fair value measurements required under accounting standards
for Fair Value Measurements. Provides a hierarchy
that entities must use to estimate the selling price, eliminates
the use of the residual method for allocation, and expands the
ongoing disclosure requirements.
|
|
The Company does not expect the adoption of this statement to
have a material on its consolidated financial statements
|
|
January 2, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company
has chosen to prospectively adopt this standard as of
January 3, 2010
|
|
|
NOTE 3
|
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL AND NONFINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
Fair value is measured as the price at which an asset could be
exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable,
willing parties. A liabilitys fair value is defined as the
amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new
obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the
liability with the creditor.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized
based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used
to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, directly
related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs
to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as
follows:
Level 1 Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the
measurement date.
Level 2 Inputs (other than quoted prices
included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly
observable for the asset or liability through correlation with
market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the
instruments anticipated life.
Level 3 Inputs are unobservable and reflect
managements best estimate of what market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement
date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the
valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the
model.
The Companys financial and nonfinancial assets and
liabilities subject to fair value measurements on a recurring
basis are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market mutual funds
|
|
$
|
97,849
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
F-15
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents total $130,315 as of January 3,
2009, and are comprised of $97,849 of money market mutual funds
and $32,466 of bank deposits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on January 2, 2010
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market mutual funds
|
|
$
|
13,606
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred acquisition payments(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,963
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents totaled $228,430 as of January 2,
2010, and were comprised of $13,606 of money market mutual funds
and $214,824 of bank deposits. |
|
(2) |
|
Deferred acquisition payments represent the fair value of
estimated acquisition payments that are contingent upon RCI
achieving specified minimum earnings thresholds over one or more
years. The Company utilized a discounted cash flow model that
incorporated several different assumptions of future performance
and a discount rate of 13.6% to determine fair value. The
Company accreted $951 of its deferred acquisition payments from
the acquisition date of Retail Convergence, Inc.
(RCI) through the end of fiscal 2009, and the
corresponding charge was recorded to changes in fair value of
deferred acquisition payments on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. |
The Companys financial assets subject to fair value
measurements on a nonrecurring basis are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements on January 3, 2009
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,418
|
|
For fiscal 2008, the Company recognized an other than temporary
impairment loss of $1,665 which reduced the carrying value of
one of its equity investments from $3,083 to its estimated fair
value of $1,418. Fair value was determined using Level 3
unobservable inputs including the use of discounted cash flow
models.
There were no nonrecurring fair value measurements in fiscal
2009.
F-16
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
NOTE 4
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
The major classes of property and equipment, at cost, as of
January 3, 2009 and January 2, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
$
|
190,957
|
|
|
$
|
231,954
|
|
Building and building improvements
|
|
|
44,721
|
|
|
|
44,822
|
|
Furniture, warehouse and office equipment, and other
|
|
|
40,423
|
|
|
|
45,722
|
|
Land
|
|
|
7,889
|
|
|
|
7,889
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
4,592
|
|
|
|
8,847
|
|
Capitalized leases
|
|
|
28,141
|
|
|
|
29,132
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318,220
|
|
|
|
368,366
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(153,387
|
)
|
|
|
(205,037
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
164,833
|
|
|
$
|
163,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys net book value in capital leases, which
consist of warehouse equipment and computer hardware, was
$18,500 as of January 2, 2010, and $22,595 as of
January 3, 2009. Amortization of capital leases is included
within depreciation and amortization expense on the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. Interest expense recorded on capital
leases was $1,470 for fiscal 2009, $1,375 for fiscal 2008 and
$711 for fiscal 2007.
|
|
NOTE 5
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying
amount of goodwill for each of the Companys reportable
segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interactive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-Commerce
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Engagement
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
January 3, 2009
|
|
$
|
82,758
|
|
|
$
|
112,238
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
194,996
|
|
Acquisitions(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,787
|
|
|
|
172,888
|
|
|
|
177,675
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2, 2010
|
|
$
|
83,090
|
|
|
$
|
117,025
|
|
|
$
|
172,888
|
|
|
$
|
373,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In April 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of
Silverlign Group Inc., and the allocation of the purchase price
over the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets
acquired resulted in $3,162 of goodwill. In September 2009, the
Company completed the acquisition of Pepperjam, and the
allocation of the purchase price over the fair value of the
tangible and intangible assets acquired resulted in $1,625 of
goodwill. In November 2009, the Company completed the
acquisition of RCI, and the allocation of the purchase price
over the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets
acquired resulted in $172,888 of goodwill. |
F-17
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
The Companys intangible assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Gross carrying value of intangible assets subject to
amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts
|
|
$
|
38,773
|
|
|
$
|
41,190
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Member relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,200
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Supplier relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,186
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
4,805
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(691
|
)
|
|
|
(482
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,883
|
|
|
|
83,818
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Accumulated amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts
|
|
|
(15,302
|
)
|
|
|
(22,907
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Member relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Supplier relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
(1,599
|
)
|
|
|
(2,888
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
(1,152
|
)
|
|
|
(2,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
(470
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,340
|
)
|
|
|
(29,172
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts
|
|
|
23,471
|
|
|
|
18,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplier relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
2,239
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased technology
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets subject to amortization, net
|
|
|
28,543
|
|
|
|
54,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indefinite life intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
18,120
|
|
|
|
78,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
$
|
46,663
|
|
|
$
|
132,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
Amortization expense of intangible assets was $10,722 for fiscal
2009, $13,553 for fiscal 2008 and $4,531 for fiscal 2007.
Estimated future amortization expense related to intangible
assets as of January 2, 2010, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2010
|
|
$
|
16,118
|
|
Fiscal 2011
|
|
|
14,283
|
|
Fiscal 2012
|
|
|
10,105
|
|
Fiscal 2013
|
|
|
7,715
|
|
Fiscal 2014
|
|
|
6,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company accounts for acquisitions using the acquisition
method of accounting. Under the acquisition method, assets
acquired and liabilities assumed from acquisitions are recorded
at their fair values as of the acquisition date. Any excess of
the purchase price over the fair values of the net assets
acquired are recorded as goodwill. The Companys purchased
intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for tax
purposes. However, acquisition method accounting allows for the
establishment of deferred tax liabilities on purchased
intangible assets, other than goodwill.
Retail
Convergence
On November 17, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition
of 100% of the outstanding common stock of RCI pursuant to the
terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 27,
2009. RCI operates RueLaLa.com, a provider of online private
sales and SmartBargains.com, an off-price
e-commerce
marketplace. The Company believes the acquisition will allow the
Company to enter the private sale and off-price
e-commerce
marketplace markets and broaden its
e-commerce
solution offerings.
As consideration for the acquisition of RCI, the Company paid
cash of $92,133 and issued 4,572 shares of the
Companys common stock valued at $93,945 based on the
closing share price on the acquisition date. In addition, the
Company is obligated to pay additional payments of up to
$170,000 over a three year period beginning with RCI fiscal year
2010 contingent on RCIs achievement of certain financial
performance targets, of which the Company has the ability to pay
up to $44,100 with shares of the Companys common stock. To
reach the maximum earnout, RCI will need to achieve earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) of $51,900 in fiscal year 2012, excluding
compensation expense on the earnout payment and certain other
adjustments as defined in the RCI merger agreement. A maximum of
$46,200 of the earnout will be paid to RCI employees based on
performance conditions, which will be treated as compensation
expense. The remaining $123,800 of the earnout will be accounted
for as additional acquisition consideration. On the acquisition
date, the Company recorded a liability of $60,012 which
represents the fair value of the portion of the earnout that
will be accounted for as additional acquisition consideration.
Any adjustment to the fair value of the Companys estimate
of the earnout payment will impact changes in fair value of
deferred acquisition payments on the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Operations and could have a material impact to its
financial results.
Additionally, the Company incurred approximately $2,100 in
transaction costs directly related to the acquisition that were
expensed in fiscal 2009. RCIs results of operations are
included on the Companys Consolidated Statement of
Operations beginning on November 17, 2009, and the Company
generated $26,347 of net revenues and incurred a net loss of
$3,022 in fiscal 2009.
F-19
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
The table below summarizes the fair values of the RCI assets and
acquired liabilities assumed based on the total consideration at
acquisition of $246,090 which represents $92,133 of cash,
$93,945 of common stock issued, and $60,012 of deferred
acquisition payments. The following table also includes cash
acquired of $8,841 as of the acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
31,129
|
|
Propery, plant and equipment
|
|
|
8,031
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
172,888
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
59,569
|
|
Member relationships
|
|
|
22,200
|
|
Supplier relationships
|
|
|
11,186
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
305,244
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(29,718
|
)
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities and other
|
|
|
(29,436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(59,154
|
)
|
Total consideration
|
|
|
246,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability arising from contingent consideration
|
|
|
(60,012
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid at acquisition date
|
|
$
|
186,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-Dialog,
Inc.
On February 13, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition
of e-Dialog,
Inc.
(e-Dialog)
pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
January 23, 2008.
e-Dialog is
a provider of advanced
e-mail
marketing services and solutions to more than 100 companies
in the U.S. and Europe. The Company believes the
acquisition will expand the breadth and depth of its interactive
marketing services capabilities, its reach into existing and new
vertical markets, and its growing European presence. The Company
also believes that
e-Dialog
will benefit from the Companys large scale and
market-leading position in
e-commerce
and multichannel services. As consideration for the acquisition
of e-Dialog,
the Company paid $148,363 in cash. In connection with the
acquisition, the Company issued 568 restricted stock units and
restricted stock awards with an aggregate value of approximately
$9,300 to employees of
e-Dialog
based on the market price of the Companys stock on the
grant date. Recipients are required to remain employed for
specified periods of time subsequent to the acquisition in order
for the stock units to vest. The $9,300 will be recognized as
stock-based compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures,
over the required service period.
The total purchase price was $150,066, including
acquisition-related transaction costs of $1,703.
Acquisition-related transaction costs include advisory, legal
and other external costs directly related to the merger.
e-Dialogs
results of operations are included in the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Operations beginning on
February 13, 2008.
F-20
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
The following table summarizes the fair values of the
e-Dialog
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including cash
acquired, as of the acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
17,067
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
4,530
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
112,238
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts
|
|
|
19,470
|
|
Internal-developed software
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
17,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
175,672
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(6,564
|
)
|
Long-term deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(19,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(25,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
150,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zendor.com
Ltd.
On December 14, 2007, the Company completed the acquisition
of Zendor.com Ltd. (Zendor) pursuant to the terms of
an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated November 30, 2007
(Zendor Agreement). Zendor is a United Kingdom-based
provider of fulfillment, customer care and
e-commerce
solutions. The Company believes the acquisition establishes it
as an
end-to-end
e-commerce
solution provider capable of delivering integrated, multichannel
e-commerce
solutions to both the U.K. and global retailers and brands. As
consideration for the acquisition of Zendor, the Company paid
$9,920 in cash, including acquisition-related transaction costs
of approximately $1,159. Acquisition-related transaction costs
include advisory, legal and other external costs directly
related to the merger. Zendors results of operations are
included in the Companys results of operations beginning
on the acquisition date of December 14, 2007.
The allocation of the purchase price over the fair value of the
tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired resulted in
$1,878 recorded as goodwill. The following table summarizes the
fair values of the Zendor assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, including cash acquired, as of the acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
9,830
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
17,532
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(7,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
Accretive
Commerce, Inc.
On September 10, 2007, the Company completed the
acquisition of Accretive Commerce, Inc. (Accretive)
pursuant to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
August 16, 2007 (Accretive Agreement).
Accretive is an
e-commerce
solutions provider that offers
e-commerce
technology, customer care and fulfillment solutions as well as
related services. The Company believes the acquisition of
Accretive strengthens its position in the
e-commerce
industry and enhances stockholder value by expanding its
infrastructure and expanding its client base. As consideration
for the acquisition of Accretive, the Company paid approximately
$98,200 in cash.
The total purchase price is $98,600, including
acquisition-related transaction costs of approximately $400.
Acquisition-related transaction costs include advisory, legal
and other external costs directly related to the merger.
Accretives results of operations are included in the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations beginning on
the acquisition date of September 10, 2007. The following
table summarizes the fair values of the Accretive assets
acquired and liabilities assumed, including cash acquired, as of
the acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
$
|
16,802
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
9,197
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Customer contracts
|
|
|
15,008
|
|
Employee non-compete agreements
|
|
|
3,838
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
61,916
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
8,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
115,399
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
(14,962
|
)
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(16,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
98,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Pro Forma Financial Information
The financial information in the table below summarizes the
combined results of operations of the Company, RCI and
e-Dialog on
a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as
of the beginning of each of the periods presented. The pro forma
financial information is presented for informational purposes
only and is not indicative of the results of operations that
would have been achieved if the acquisition had actually taken
place at the beginning of each of the periods presented and is
not intended to be a projection of future results or trends. The
pro forma financial information for all periods presented
includes pro forma adjustments, net of any applicable tax for a
reduction to interest income on the Companys cash and cash
equivalents used to fund the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,054,843
|
|
|
$
|
1,103,978
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(44,400
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,433
|
)
|
F-22
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
NOTE 7
|
LONG-TERM
DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITY
|
The following table summarizes the Companys long-term debt
as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
$
|
161,951
|
|
|
$
|
172,391
|
|
Notes payable(1)
|
|
|
12,663
|
|
|
|
12,479
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
24,833
|
|
|
|
20,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
199,447
|
|
|
|
205,793
|
|
Less: Current portion of convertible notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,443
|
)
|
Less: Current portion of notes payable
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
Less: Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(4,703
|
)
|
|
|
(5,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
194,560
|
|
|
$
|
145,090
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The estimated fair market value of the notes payable
approximated their carrying value as of January 3, 2009 and
January 2, 2010. |
In May 2008, the FASB issued accounting standards which require
the issuer of convertible debt instruments with cash settlement
features to separately account for the liability and equity
components of the instrument. The Companys $207,500
principal amounts of subordinated convertible notes are subject
to the provisions of these standards because the Company has the
ability to elect cash settlement of the conversion value of the
notes. The liability component of the notes is determined based
on the present value of the notes using the Companys
nonconvertible debt borrowing rate on the issuance date. In
order to determine the fair value of the debt portion and equity
portion of the Companys convertible notes, the Company
used a market approach to determine the market rate for
comparable transactions had the Company issued nonconvertible
debt with similar embedded features other than the conversion
feature by using prices and other relevant information generated
by market transactions at or near the issuance date of its
convertible notes. The equity component is the difference
between the proceeds from the issuance of the note and the fair
value of the liability component. The resulting debt discount,
equal to the excess of the principal amount of the liability
over its carrying amount, is amortized to interest expense using
the effective interest method over the expected life of the
debt. The Company adopted these standards on January 4,
2009, and applied it retrospectively to all prior periods
presented.
3%
Convertible Notes due 2025
In fiscal 2005, the Company completed a public offering of
$57,500 aggregate principal amount of 3% subordinated
convertible notes due June 1, 2025. The notes bear interest
at 3%, payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1.
Holders may convert the notes into shares of the Companys
common stock (or cash or a combination of the Companys
common stock and cash, if the Company so elects) at a conversion
rate of 56.1545 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes
(representing a conversion price of approximately $17.81 per
share). At any time on or after June 6, 2010, the Company
may redeem any of the notes for cash at a redemption price of
100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, up to but excluding the redemption date.
Holders may require the Company to repurchase the notes at a
repurchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus
accrued and unpaid interest, if any, on June 1 of 2010, 2015 and
2020, or at any time prior to maturity upon the occurrence of a
designated event. Based on the Companys closing stock
price of $25.39 on January 2, 2010, the if-converted value
of the notes exceeds the aggregate principal amount of the notes
by $24,475.
F-23
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
The following table provides additional information about the
Companys 3% convertible notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Carrying amount of the equity component
|
|
$
|
18,187
|
|
|
$
|
18,187
|
|
Principal amount of the liability component
|
|
$
|
57,500
|
|
|
$
|
57,500
|
|
Unamortized discount of liability component
|
|
$
|
6,574
|
|
|
$
|
2,057
|
|
Net carrying amount of liability component
|
|
$
|
50,926
|
|
|
$
|
55,443
|
|
Remaining amortization period of discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 months
|
|
Effective interest rate on liability component
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
%
|
The following table provides the components of interest expense
for the Companys 3% convertible notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Amortization of the discount on the liability component
|
|
$
|
3,579
|
|
|
$
|
4,021
|
|
|
$
|
4,517
|
|
Contract interest coupon
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
Amortization of the liability component of the issue costs
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
5,635
|
|
|
$
|
6,105
|
|
|
$
|
6,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair market value of the 3% subordinated
convertible notes was $82,584 as of January 2, 2010 and
$40,825 as of January 3, 2009 based on quoted market prices.
2.5% Convertible
Notes due 2027
In July 2007, the Company completed a private placement of
$150,000 of aggregate principal amount of 2.5% subordinated
convertible notes due June 1, 2027, raising net proceeds of
approximately $145,000, after deducting initial purchasers
discount and issuance costs. The notes bear interest at 2.5%,
payable semi-annually on June 1 and December 1.
Holders may convert the notes into shares of the Companys
common stock (or cash or a combination of the Companys
common stock and cash, if the Company so elects) at a conversion
rate of 33.3333 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes
(representing a conversion price of approximately $30.00 per
share). At any time on or after June 8, 2014, the Company
may redeem any of the notes for cash at a redemption price of
100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, if any, up to but excluding, the redemption date. If a
fundamental change occurs prior to the maturity of the notes,
the holders may require the Company to repurchase all or part of
their notes at a repurchase price of 100% of their principal
amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but
excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date. In addition,
the holders may require the Company to repurchase all or part of
their notes for cash on June 1 of 2014, 2017 and 2022,
respectively, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their
principal amount, plus any accrued or unpaid interest, if any,
to, but excluding, the date of repurchase. Based on the
Companys closing stock price of $25.39 on January 2,
2010, the if-converted value of the notes does not exceed the
aggregate principal amount of the notes.
F-24
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
The following table provides additional information about the
Companys 2.5% convertible notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Carrying amount of the equity component
|
|
$
|
26,783
|
|
|
$
|
26,783
|
|
Principal amount of the liability component
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
Unamortized discount of liability component
|
|
$
|
38,975
|
|
|
$
|
33,052
|
|
Net carrying amount of liability component
|
|
$
|
111,025
|
|
|
$
|
116,948
|
|
Remaining amortization period of discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 months
|
|
Effective interest rate on liability component
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.60
|
%
|
The following table provides the components of interest expense
for the Companys 2.5% convertible notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Amortization of the discount on the liability component
|
|
$
|
2,964
|
|
|
$
|
5,445
|
|
|
$
|
5,923
|
|
Contract interest coupon
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
Amortization of the liability component of the issue costs
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
5,395
|
|
|
$
|
9,629
|
|
|
$
|
10,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair market value of the 2.5% subordinated
convertible notes was $157,125 as of January 2, 2010 and
$68,748 as of January 3, 2009 based on quoted market prices.
Note
Payable
In fiscal 2004, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company entered
into an agreement to purchase a new corporate headquarters in
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, together with an option to
purchase an additional parcel of land. The purchase price for
the building was $17,000. In connection with the purchase of the
corporate headquarters, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
entered into a $13,000 mortgage note collateralized by a first
lien on substantially all of the assets of that subsidiary. The
mortgage note bears interest at 6.32% per annum and has a
maturity date of July 2014, at which time the Company is
required to pay the remaining principal balance of approximately
$11,100. The Company recorded interest expense related to the
note of $783 for fiscal 2009, $805 for fiscal 2008 and $803 for
fiscal 2007.
Capital
Lease Obligations
Certain of the Companys warehouse equipment and computer
hardware have been acquired under capital leases. The capital
leases have maturity dates ranging from May 2010 to September
2014 and bear interest at rates ranging from 5.3% to 8.7% per
annum. Capital lease obligations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Gross capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
23,816
|
|
Less: imputed interest
|
|
|
(2,893
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total present value of future minimum lease payments
|
|
|
20,923
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(5,065
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
15,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
Credit
Facilities
In January 2008, the Company obtained a secured revolving credit
facility that matures in January 2013 with a syndicate of banks
with an initial availability of $75,000. In May 2008, the
Company expanded the credit facility by $15,000 thereby
increasing the availability under the credit facility to
$90,000. Subject to certain conditions, the credit facility may
be increased to $150,000. The $90,000 credit facility provides
for the issuance of up to $20,000 of letters of credit, which is
included in the $90,000 available under the credit facility. The
credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of the
Companys assets. The Company may elect to have amounts
outstanding under the credit facilities bear interest at either
a LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 0.75% to 1.50%, the
prime rate plus an applicable margin of 0.75% to 1.50%, or at
the Federal Funds Open Rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin is
determined by the leverage ratio of funded debt to EBITDA, as
defined in the credit facility. The Company had no outstanding
borrowings and $6,652 of outstanding letters of credit under the
secured revolving credit facility as of January 2, 2010.
|
|
NOTE 8
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Legal
Proceedings
The Company is involved in various litigation incidental to its
business, including alleged contractual claims, claims relating
to infringement of intellectual property rights of third
parties, claims relating to the manner in which goods are sold
through its integrated platform and claims relating to the
Companys collection of sales taxes in certain states. The
Company collects sales taxes for goods owned and sold by it and
shipped into certain states. As a result, the Company is subject
from time to time to claims from other states alleging that the
Company failed to collect and remit sales taxes for sales and
shipments of products to customers in states.
Based on the merits of the cases
and/or the
amounts claimed, the Company does not believe that any claims
are likely to have a material adverse effect on its business,
financial position or results of operations. The Company may,
however incur substantial expenses and devote substantial time
to defend these claims whether or not such claims are
meritorious. In the event of a determination adverse to the
Company, the Company may incur substantial monetary liability
and may be required to implement expensive changes in its
business practices, enter into costly royalty or licensing
agreements, or begin to collect sales taxes in states in which
we previously did not. An adverse determination could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys business,
financial position or results of operations. Expenditures for
legal costs are expensed as incurred.
Operating
and Capital Commitments
The following summarizes the Companys principal operating
and capital commitments as of January 2, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by fiscal year
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations(1)
|
|
$
|
20,627
|
|
|
$
|
17,034
|
|
|
$
|
16,854
|
|
|
$
|
12,730
|
|
|
$
|
9,219
|
|
|
$
|
18,984
|
|
|
$
|
95,448
|
|
Purchase obligations(1)
|
|
|
72,097
|
|
|
|
13,878
|
|
|
|
13,878
|
|
|
|
5,350
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
45,951
|
|
|
|
155,199
|
|
Client revenue share payments(1)
|
|
|
20,274
|
|
|
|
21,400
|
|
|
|
14,658
|
|
|
|
4,368
|
|
|
|
4,491
|
|
|
|
24,269
|
|
|
|
89,460
|
|
Debt interest(1)
|
|
|
5,882
|
|
|
|
4,509
|
|
|
|
4,497
|
|
|
|
4,481
|
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
8,784
|
|
|
|
30,431
|
|
Debt obligations
|
|
|
57,696
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
150,252
|
|
|
|
11,022
|
|
|
|
219,979
|
|
Capital lease obligations, including interest(2)
|
|
|
6,416
|
|
|
|
6,119
|
|
|
|
5,821
|
|
|
|
3,671
|
|
|
|
1,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,816
|
|
Deferred acquisition payments(3)
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
184,242
|
|
|
$
|
64,199
|
|
|
$
|
57,021
|
|
|
$
|
31,837
|
|
|
$
|
172,074
|
|
|
$
|
109,010
|
|
|
$
|
618,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Not required to be recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as
of January 2, 2010 in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. |
|
(2) |
|
Capital lease obligations, excluding interest, are recorded in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(3) |
|
The Company will be obligated to pay up to an additional
$170,000 over a three year period beginning with fiscal 2010
contingent on RCIs achievement of certain financial
targets, of which the Company has the ability to pay up to
$44,100 with shares of the Companys common stock. See
Note 6, Acquisitions, for more information. |
Approximately $2,052 of unrecognized tax benefits have been
recorded as liabilities as of January 2, 2010, and the
Company is uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be
settled; as a result, these obligations are not included in the
table above. Changes to these tax contingencies that are
reasonably possible in the next 12 months are not expected
to be material.
The Company leases customer contact centers, fulfillment
centers, office facilities and certain fixed assets under
non-cancelable operating leases. Rent expense under operating
lease agreements was $21,796 for fiscal 2009, $20,482 for fiscal
2008 and $6,400 for fiscal 2007. Certain of these leases contain
customary renewal and extension provisions.
|
|
NOTE 9
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
Preferred
Stock:
Under the Companys Certificate of Incorporation, the
maximum number of authorized shares of preferred stock,
$0.01 par value, is 5,000. The preferred stock may be
issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be
determined at the time of issuance by the Board of Directors,
without further action by stockholders, and may include voting
rights (including the right to vote as a series on particular
matters), preferences as to dividends and liquidation and
conversion and redemption rights. No preferred stock was issued
or outstanding for fiscal 2009 or fiscal 2008.
Common
Stock:
Under the Companys Certificate of Incorporation, the
maximum number of authorized shares of common stock,
$0.01 par value, is 90,000.
In August 2009, the Company completed a registered public
offering of 5,439 common shares at $17.00 per share. Net
proceeds from the sale of the common shares after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses
were approximately $88,000.
Stockholders
Right Plan:
On April 2, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized
95 shares of Series A Junior Preferred Stock
(Series A) and declared a dividend distribution
of one right (a Right) for each outstanding share of
common stock to the stockholders of record on the close of
business on April 14, 2006. Each Right entitles the
registered holder to purchase from the Company a unit consisting
of one one-thousandth of a share of Series A, at a price of
$85 per unit, subject to adjustment. However, the Rights are not
exercisable unless certain events occur, such as a person or
group acquiring or obtaining the right to acquire, or making a
tender offer or exchange offer for, beneficial ownership of 20%
or more of the Companys outstanding common stock (or, in
the case of any stockholder that as of April 2, 2006
beneficially owned 19% or more of the Companys outstanding
shares of common stock, 25.1% or more). Subject to certain
exceptions, upon exercise of the Right, each holder of a Right
will have the right to receive shares of the Companys
common stock, or other consideration, having a value equal to
two times the exercise price of the Right. Additionally, at
certain times, the Company has the right to redeem the Rights in
whole, but not in part, at a price of $.001 per Right. The
description and terms of the Rights are set forth in a Rights
Agreement, dated April 2, 2006. The Rights will expire on
April 14, 2016, unless the Rights are earlier redeemed or
exchanged in accordance with the terms of the Rights Agreement.
As of January 2, 2010, no Series A shares were issued
or outstanding.
F-27
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
The Company currently maintains the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
(the Plan) which provides for the grant of equity to
certain employees, directors and other persons. As of
January 2, 2010, 1,494 shares of common stock were
available for future grants under the Plan. The equity awards
granted under the Plan generally vest at various times over
periods ranging up to five years and have terms of up to ten
years after the date of grant, unless the optionees
service to the Company is interrupted or terminated. Stock
appreciation rights (SARs) may be granted under the
Plan either alone or in tandem with stock options. No SARs have
been granted to date under the plan.
Stock
Options and Warrants
The following table summarizes the stock option and warrant
activity for fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 3, 2009
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
|
$
|
9.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(797
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 2, 2010
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
$
|
9.88
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
|
|
$
|
50,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected to vest at January 2, 2010
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
$
|
9.88
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
|
|
$
|
50,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 2, 2010
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
$
|
9.88
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
|
|
$
|
50,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No options or warrants were granted in fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008
or fiscal 2007. The total intrinsic value of options and
warrants exercised was $6,736 for fiscal 2009, $511 for fiscal
2008 and $10,461 for fiscal 2007 as determined as of the date of
exercise. Cash proceeds from options and warrants exercised
during fiscal 2009 were $5,320. The Company recognized no
stock-based compensation expense for options and warrants in
fiscal 2009. For fiscal 2008, the Company recognized a
stock-based compensation benefit of $30 due to forfeited shares
in excess of the Companys estimated forfeiture rate. The
total stock-based compensation expense was $644 in fiscal 2007.
Restricted
Stock Units and Awards
The following summarizes the restricted stock unit and
restricted stock award activity for fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at January 3, 2009
|
|
|
3,793
|
|
|
$
|
18.86
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
$
|
11.13
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(1,015
|
)
|
|
$
|
15.97
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
$
|
13.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested shares at January 2, 2010
|
|
|
4,294
|
|
|
$
|
16.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
During fiscal 2008, the Company granted to employees 2,942
restricted stock units of the Companys common stock at a
weighted average fair value at grant date of $14.28. During
fiscal 2007, the Company granted to employees 1,095 restricted
stock units of the Companys common stock at a weighted
average fair value at grant date of $20.16.
The total intrinsic value of restricted stock units that vested
was $13,152 for fiscal 2009, $9,349 for fiscal 2008 and $4,676
for fiscal 2007. As of January 2, 2010, there was
approximately $31,581 of unrecognized pre-tax compensation cost,
net of forfeitures, related to nonvested stock units, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining
period of approximately 2.25 years.
The total stock-based compensation expense recognized for
restricted stock was $23,749 for fiscal 2009, $18,420 for fiscal
2008 and $7,384 for fiscal 2007.
The loss before income taxes and the related benefit from income
taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(2,982
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,588
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,541
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(864
|
)
|
|
|
(9,968
|
)
|
|
|
(10,225
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(3,846
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30,556
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
State
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
|
1,554
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current
|
|
$
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
2,253
|
|
|
$
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(1,420
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,252
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,123
|
|
State
|
|
|
(2,223
|
)
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
(3,921
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred
|
|
$
|
(3,643
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,838
|
)
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(1,356
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,764
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,711
|
|
State
|
|
|
(1,541
|
)
|
|
|
3,104
|
|
|
|
(2,367
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(2,887
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,585
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
The significant components of net deferred tax assets and
liabilities as of January 3, 2009 and January 2, 2010
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
160,284
|
|
|
$
|
195,484
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,810
|
|
|
|
8,008
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
5,527
|
|
|
|
5,022
|
|
Investment impairment and losses
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
3,479
|
|
Allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
2,161
|
|
|
|
3,072
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credits
|
|
|
1,674
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
Research and development tax credits
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Accrued bonus
|
|
|
2,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
3,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
191,676
|
|
|
|
225,284
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(123,491
|
)
|
|
|
(157,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
68,185
|
|
|
|
67,324
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,891
|
)
|
|
|
(3,174
|
)
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
(17,518
|
)
|
|
|
(45,845
|
)
|
Interest on convertible notes
|
|
|
(18,355
|
)
|
|
|
(14,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(38,764
|
)
|
|
|
(63,511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
29,421
|
|
|
$
|
3,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of January 2, 2010, the Company had available federal,
state and foreign net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $507,318, $268,592 and $18,705, respectively,
which expire in the years 2010 through 2029. The Company will
continue to monitor all available evidence related to its
ability to utilize these tax attributes.
The Companys net operating loss carryforwards expire as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2010-2015
|
|
$
|
59,307
|
|
2016-2021
|
|
|
396,526
|
|
2022-2029
|
|
|
338,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
794,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realization is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income
prior to expiration of the net operating loss carryforwards.
Although realization is not assured, management believes it is
more likely than not that the deferred asset, net of its related
valuation allowance, will be realized. The amount of the
deferred tax asset considered
F-30
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
realizable, however, could be reduced in the near term if
estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward
period are reduced.
Until the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, in the opinion of
management, the Company was not certain of the realization of
its deferred tax assets. Thus, a valuation allowance had been
provided against federal and state deferred tax assets. In the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company evaluated the need
for a full valuation allowance and concluded that a portion of
the valuation allowance should be reduced. The Company
determined that it is more likely than not that it will realize
the benefit of a portion of these deferred tax assets. This was
based primarily on the Companys earnings history over the
prior three fiscal years as well as expected future taxable
income. Each year, the Company updates its earnings history over
the prior three years. The Companys income tax
expense/(benefit) included (increases)/decreases from valuation
allowance adjustments of $3,122 for fiscal 2009, $2,085 for
fiscal 2008 and ($294) for fiscal 2007. The valuation allowance
increased by approximately $34,469 during fiscal 2009, primarily
as a result of valuation allowances placed on newly acquired
companies net operating loss carryforwards.
The Company believes that it is more likely than not that the
benefit from certain federal, state and foreign net operating
loss carryforward will not be realized. Accordingly, the Company
has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $141,106,
$8,347 and $5,122 respectively, on the deferred tax asset
relating to these net operating loss carryforwards. If or when
recognized, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of the
valuation allowance on deferred tax assets at January 2,
2010 of approximately $154,575 will be recognized as a reduction
of income tax expense. Additionally, there is a valuation
allowance on capital losses of $3,175 and on state credits of
$210 as of January 2, 2010.
As defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Section 382), generally, upon a change of
control, a company is subject to limitations on its ability to
use its pre-change of control net operating losses and certain
built-in losses and deductions to offset taxable income in
future years. This limitation also applies to subsidiaries
net operating losses acquired as a result of an acquisition. The
amount of pre-change of control net operating losses that can be
utilized in any post-change of control tax year is limited to
the product of the value of the company immediately before the
change of control, multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt
interest rate that is published by the Internal Revenue Service,
in effect at the time the change of control occurs
(Section 382 Limitation). Any portion of these
limited net operating losses not used in a particular year may
be carried to subsequent years until such time as another change
of control occurs or the net operating losses expire unused
(based on the original expiration date). There is no limitation,
under Section 382, on the use of post-change of control net
operating losses unless another change of control occurs at
which point the pre-change of control Section 382
Limitation amount would either remain the same, or be reduced if
the companys value had declined since the previous change
of control. The Company has in previous years incurred a change
of control as well as acquired net operating losses in
subsidiary acquisitions. The Company has federal net operating
losses of approximately $308,611 (out of a total of $507,318)
which will expire as a result of the Section 382 Limitation
regardless of the amount of future taxable income and thus has a
full valuation allowance recorded against this deferred tax
asset.
Prior to fiscal 2009, changes to valuation allowances recorded
against deferred tax assets acquired in an acquisition reduced
goodwill or other noncurrent intangible assets. Effective with
fiscal 2009, accounting standards require changes to of these
valuation allowances to be recorded as an adjustment to income
tax expense.
In fiscal years 2009 and 2007, there was a tax benefit generated
from stock-based compensation that decreased taxable income. The
tax benefit increased additional paid-in capital by $1,176 and
$4,537, respectively. In fiscal 2008, there was a reduction of
tax benefit generated from stock-based compensation that
increased taxable income. The tax reduction in tax benefit from
this increase reduced additional paid-in capital by $919.
Included in the net operating loss deferred tax asset above is
approximately $7,558 of the federal net operating loss
carryforwards attributable to excess stock option deductions.
Due to the provisions of accounting for share-
F-31
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
based payments concerning the timing of tax benefits related to
excess stock deductions that can be credited to additional paid
in capital, the related valuation allowance cannot be reversed,
even if the facts and circumstances indicate that it is more
likely than not that the deferred tax asset can be realized. The
valuation allowance will only be reversed as the related
deferred asset is applied to reduce taxes payable. The Company
follows tax law ordering to determine when such net operating
loss has been realized.
The differences between the statutory federal income tax rate
and the effective income tax rate are provided in the following
reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign statutory rates differing from U.S. statutory rate
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)%
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(37.4
|
)%
|
State taxes
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
Non-deductible transaction costs
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)%
|
Non-deductible officers compensation
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
Non-deductible stock compensation expense
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)%
|
Other non-deductible items
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
75.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
(27.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to income taxes in
the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in evaluating
its tax positions and determining its provision for income taxes.
During the ordinary course of business, there are many
transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain. The Company establishes liabilities
for tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether, and
the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. These
reserves are established when the Company believes that certain
positions might be challenged despite the Companys belief
that its tax return positions are fully supportable. The Company
adjusts these reserves in light of changing facts and
circumstances, such as the outcome of tax audit. The provision
for income taxes includes the impact of reserve provisions and
changes to reserves that are considered appropriate. A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of the fiscal year
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
$
|
1,708
|
|
Gross increases for tax positions related to current year
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Gross increases for tax positions related to prior years
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Gross increases acquired in acquisitions
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross decreases for tax positions related to prior years
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gross decreases as a result of a lapse of the statute of
limitations
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of the fiscal year
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
$
|
1,708
|
|
|
$
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
As of January 2, 2010, changes to the Companys tax
contingencies that are reasonably possible in the next
12 months are $0. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits
that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate were
$2,052 as of January 2, 2010 and $1,708 as of
January 3, 2009. Unrecognized tax benefits related to the
opening balance sheet of acquired companies was $0 as of
January 2, 2010 and $347 as of January 3, 2009.
The Companys policy is to include interest and penalties
related to the Companys tax contingencies in income tax
expense. The total amount of interest and penalties related to
uncertain tax positions and recognized in the statement of
earnings for fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 was $78 and $83,
respectively. The total amount of interest and penalties related
to uncertain tax positions and recognized in the balance sheet
was $230 as of January 2, 2010 and $152 as of
January 3, 2009.
The Company is not currently undergoing any income tax audits
nor has it been notified of any pending audits. For
U.S. federal income taxes, the statute of limitations has
expired through fiscal year 2005. The Internal Revenue Service
cannot assess additional taxes for closed years, but can adjust
the net operating loss carryforward generated in those closed
years until the statute of limitations for the year the net
operating loss is utilized has expired.
The Company does not provide for U.S. taxes on
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries since the Company
intends to invest such undistributed earnings indefinitely
outside of the U.S. If such amounts were repatriated, the
amount of U.S. income taxes would be immaterial.
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the fiscal year. Diluted loss per share is computed by
dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the fiscal year including the
dilutive effect of (i) stock awards as determined under the
treasury stock method, and (ii) convertible debt
instruments as determined under the if-converted method.
The following is a summary of the securities outstanding during
the respective periods that have been excluded from the
calculations because the effect on net income per share would
have been anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Stock units and awards
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
|
|
4,294
|
|
Stock options and warrants
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
|
4,244
|
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
8,229
|
|
|
|
8,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,983
|
|
|
|
16,265
|
|
|
|
15,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13
|
MAJOR
SUPPLIERS/ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY
|
The Company purchased inventory from one supplier amounting to
$41,337 or 18.2% of total inventory purchased during fiscal
2009, from two suppliers amounting to $39,788 or 16.8% and
$29,989 or 12.7% of total inventory purchased during fiscal
2008, and from two suppliers amounting to $44,201 or 18.0% and
$31,288 or 12.7% of total inventory purchased during fiscal 2007.
For fiscal 2009, sales to customers through one of the
Companys clients
e-commerce
businesses accounted for 11.1% of the Companys net
revenues, sales through another one of the Companys
clients
e-commerce
businesses accounted for 10.2% of the Companys net
revenues, and sales through the Companys top five
clients
e-commerce
businesses accounted for 36.9% of the Companys net
revenues.
F-33
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
For fiscal 2008, sales to customers through one of the
Companys clients
e-commerce
businesses accounted for 11.5% of the Companys net
revenues, sales through another one of the Companys
clients
e-commerce
businesses accounted for 11.5% of the Companys net
revenues, and sales through the Companys top five
clients
e-commerce
businesses accounted for 38.0% of the Companys net
revenues.
For fiscal 2007, sales to customers through one of the
Companys clients
e-commerce
businesses accounted for 13.2% of the Companys net
revenues, sales through another one of the Companys
clients
e-commerce
businesses accounted for 11.9% of the Companys net
revenues, and sales through the Companys top five
clients
e-commerce
businesses accounted for 45.3% of the Companys net
revenues.
No other supplier amounted to more than 10% of total inventory
purchased for any period presented, nor did any one customer
account for more than 10% of net revenues for any period
presented.
|
|
NOTE 14
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION
|
Effective upon the acquisition of RCI, the Company expanded its
operating structure from two to three reportable segments:
e-commerce
services, interactive marketing services and consumer
engagement. For
e-commerce
services, the Company delivers customized solutions to its
clients through an integrated platform which is comprised of
three components: technology, fulfillment and customer care. For
interactive marketing services, the Company offers a
comprehensive digital and traditional agency and
e-mail
marketing services that include brand development and strategic
account planning, user experience and creative design,
interactive marketing, traditional advertising, media buying,
video, marketing content and promotional development,
e-mail
marketing and distribution, Web store usability, and product
photography and content development. For consumer engagement,
the Company offers an online platform on which retailers and
brands can sell excess inventory through private sales as well
as in the off-price marketplace. The private sales channel is an
online platform that uses sales limited in time and inventory to
create an efficient and effective channel for brands to sell
excess inventory in a brand-friendly environment designed to
protect the brands image and enhance brand visibility. Our
off-price marketplace is an online alternative sales channel for
manufacturers, brands, distributors and other retailers to
liquidate inventory.
The Company manages its segments based on an internal management
reporting process that provides segment revenue and segment
operating income before depreciation, amortization, stock-based
compensation expense and changes in fair value of deferred
acquisition payments for determining financial decisions and
allocating resources. The Company believes that segment
operating income before depreciation, amortization, stock-based
compensation expense and changes in fair value of deferred
acquisition payments is an appropriate measure of evaluating the
operational performance of the Companys segments. The
Company uses this financial measure for financial and
operational decision making and as a means to evaluate segment
performance. It is also used for planning, forecasting and
analyzing future periods. This measure should be considered in
addition to, not as a substitute for, or superior to, income
from operations or other measures of financial performance
prepared in accordance with principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
The Company manages its working capital on a consolidated basis
and does not allocate long-lived assets to segments. In
addition, segment assets are not reported to, or used by, the
Company and therefore, total segment assets have not been
disclosed.
F-34
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
The following tables present summarized information by
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
E-Commerce
|
|
|
Interactive
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Marketing Services
|
|
|
Engagement
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
737,832
|
|
|
$
|
26,894
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14,769
|
)
|
|
$
|
749,957
|
|
Costs and expenses before depreciation, amortization, changes in
fair value of deferred acquisition payments and stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
691,749
|
|
|
|
22,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,769
|
)
|
|
|
699,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income before depreciation, amortization, changes in
fair value of deferred acquisition payments and stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
46,083
|
|
|
|
4,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,698
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,337
|
|
Changes in fair value of deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,319
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,191
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,270
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Loss on sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 3, 2009
|
|
|
|
E-Commerce
|
|
|
Interactive
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Marketing Services
|
|
|
Engagement
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
900,040
|
|
|
$
|
84,508
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17,622
|
)
|
|
$
|
966,926
|
|
Costs and expenses before depreciation, amortization changes in
fair value of deferred acquisition payments and stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
837,648
|
|
|
|
69,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,622
|
)
|
|
|
889,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income before depreciation, amortization changes in
fair value of deferred acquisition payments and stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
62,392
|
|
|
|
14,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,296
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,153
|
|
Changes in fair value of deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,260
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,841
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,772
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
Impairment of equity investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(30,556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended January 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
E-Commerce
|
|
|
Interactive
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Intersegment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Marketing Services
|
|
|
Engagement
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
879,575
|
|
|
$
|
127,580
|
|
|
$
|
26,347
|
|
|
$
|
(29,287
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,004,215
|
|
Costs and expenses before depreciation, amortization, changes in
fair value of deferred acquisition payments and stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
808,232
|
|
|
|
96,451
|
|
|
|
29,445
|
|
|
|
(29,287
|
)
|
|
$
|
904,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income before depreciation, amortization, changes in
fair value of deferred acquisition payments and stock-based
compensation expense
|
|
|
71,343
|
|
|
|
31,129
|
|
|
|
(3,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
99,374
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,395
|
|
Changes in fair value of deferred acquisition payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,266
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,430
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,684
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has two product groups and one service group. The
two product groups consist of the sale of general merchandise
and freight revenue, which collectively represents the
Companys net revenues from product sales. The following
table represents net revenues attributable to the Companys
product and service groups:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 29,
|
|
|
January 3,
|
|
|
January 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Product groupings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General merchandise
|
|
$
|
429,324
|
|
|
$
|
456,886
|
|
|
$
|
409,198
|
|
Freight
|
|
|
82,870
|
|
|
|
120,187
|
|
|
|
133,051
|
|
Service fees
|
|
|
237,763
|
|
|
|
389,853
|
|
|
|
461,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
749,957
|
|
|
$
|
966,926
|
|
|
$
|
1,004,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys operations are substantially within the
United States.
|
|
NOTE 15
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
On October 17, 2008, the Company entered into a letter
agreement with Linens Holding Co. (Linens) and Hilco
Consumer Capital, L.P. (HCC), pursuant to which HCC
and the Company would act jointly as agent for Linens to
liquidate, on the LNT.com Web store, certain inventory owned by
Linens located at one of the Companys fulfillment centers.
On October 16, 2008 the Company and HCC entered into a
letter agreement outlining the terms of their joint agency with
respect to the merchandise, pursuant to which the Company would
receive a percentage of the sales price of the merchandise for
performing all services necessary to take orders, process and
ship the merchandise. M. Jeffrey Branman, one of the
Companys directors, serves as Managing Director of Hilco
Consumer Capital, LLC, the managing partner of HCC. The Company
recognized net revenues of $784 during fiscal 2009 and
F-36
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
$6,617 during fiscal 2008 on sales of merchandise pursuant to
the agency arrangement between the Company, HCC and Linens. The
percentage of the sales price earned by the Company under these
letter agreements is comparable to the percentage of the sales
price earned by the Company under its
e-commerce
agreement with Linens prior to its liquidation.
On February 22, 2010, Liberty Media Corporation, through
its subsidiary QVC, Inc., and QVCs affiliate QK Holdings,
Inc., sold 9,249 shares of the Companys outstanding
common stock, which represented its entire ownership of the
Company. On April 13, 2007, the Company entered into an
E-Commerce
Distribution Agreement with QVC, Inc. (the New QVC
Agreement) that replaced its existing agreement with iQVC,
a division of QVC (the Old QVC Agreement), under
which the Company provided technology, procurement and
fulfillment services for QVC, including selling sporting goods,
recreational
and/or
fitness related equipment and related products, apparel and
footwear to QVC for resale through the QVC Web site. Under the
New QVC Agreement, the Company provides procurement and
fulfillment services for QVC, including selling sporting goods,
recreational
and/or
fitness related equipment and related products, apparel and
footwear to QVC for resale through the QVC Web site. The terms
of these sales are comparable to those with other similar
clients.
On May 11, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with
QVC, Inc. (the QVC NFL Agreement), pursuant to which
the Company makes NFL licensed merchandise available to QVC for
QVC to sell both on its website and on live direct response
television programs. The Company will be the exclusive provider
of NFL licensed merchandise to QVC, subject to limited
exceptions, and the Companys fulfillment network will
fulfill product orders received from QVCs website and the
QVC live direct response programs.
The Company recognized net revenues of $10,140 during fiscal
2009, $8,504 during fiscal 2008 and $7,809 during fiscal 2007 on
sales to QVC under these agreements. The Company had accounts
receivable of $406 as of January 2, 2010, and $35 as of
January 3, 2009.
Michael Rubin, chairman, president and CEO of the Company, was
the owner of approximately 1.6 percent of RCIs
capital stock (on a fully-diluted as-converted basis). Upon
acquisition, Mr. Rubin received $1,324 in cash (of which
$71 is currently being held in escrow to secure post-closing
indemnification obligations of the stockholders and
optionholders of RCI) and 76 shares of the Companys
common stock (of which 11 shares are currently being held
in escrow).
|
|
NOTE 16
|
QUARTERLY
RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
|
The following tables contain selected unaudited Statement of
Operations information for each quarter of fiscal 2008 and 2009.
The Company believes that the following information reflects all
normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of the information for the periods presented. The operating
results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of
results for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended January 2, 2009
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
195,543
|
|
|
$
|
193,209
|
|
|
$
|
186,794
|
|
|
$
|
391,380
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
(18,877
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,372
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,533
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,522
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(11,498
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,069
|
|
Income (loss) per share basic(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Income (loss) per share diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
46,924
|
|
|
|
47,364
|
|
|
|
47,488
|
|
|
|
47,595
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
46,924
|
|
|
|
47,364
|
|
|
|
47,488
|
|
|
|
56,729
|
|
F-37
GSI
COMMERCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(amounts
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended January 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
196,475
|
|
|
$
|
187,181
|
|
|
$
|
190,311
|
|
|
$
|
430,248
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
(14,534
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,277
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,913
|
)
|
|
$
|
46,990
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(12,110
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,113
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,406
|
)
|
|
$
|
23,601
|
|
Income (loss) per share basic(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
Income (loss) per share diluted(1)
|
|
$
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
47,926
|
|
|
|
48,681
|
|
|
|
51,910
|
|
|
|
57,310
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
47,926
|
|
|
|
48,681
|
|
|
|
51,910
|
|
|
|
68,595
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The sum of the quarterly per share amounts may not equal per
share amounts reported for
year-to-date
periods. This is due to changes in the number of weighted
average shares outstanding and the effects of rounding for each
period. |
******
F-38