Attached files

file filename
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv32w1.htm
EX-21.1 - EX-21.1 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv21w1.htm
EX-10.5 - EX-10.5 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv10w5.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv31w1.htm
EX-32.3 - EX-32.3 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv32w3.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv32w2.htm
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv23w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv31w2.htm
EX-31.3 - EX-31.3 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv31w3.htm
EX-10.33 - EX-10.33 - P F CHANGS CHINA BISTRO INCp16854exv10w33.htm
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
 
 
Form 10-K
 
         
  þ     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
        For the Fiscal Year Ended January 3, 2010
or
  o     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
        For the transition period from          to          .
 
Commission File Number: 0-25123
 
 
 
 
P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Delaware   86-0815086
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
7676 East Pinnacle Peak Road
Scottsdale, AZ
  85255
(Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)    
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(480) 888-3000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
     
Title of Each Class   Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par Value   NASDAQ Global Select Market
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
             
Large accelerated filer o
  Accelerated filer þ   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)         
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ
 
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates as of the last day of the registrant’s second fiscal quarter ended, June 28, 2009, was $374,486,928.
 
On February 12, 2010 there were outstanding 22,933,862 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(to the extent indicated herein)
 
Specified portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement with respect to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 22, 2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
 


 

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
                 
Item
      Page
 
PART I
  1.     Business     3  
  1A.     Risk Factors     7  
  1B.     Unresolved Staff Comments     14  
  2.     Properties     15  
  3.     Legal Proceedings     16  
  4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     16  
 
PART II
  5.     Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities     17  
  6.     Selected Financial Data     19  
  7.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     20  
  7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk     40  
  8.     Financial Statements and Supplementary Data     42  
  9.     Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure     79  
  9A.     Controls and Procedures     79  
  9B.     Other Information     79  
 
PART III
  10.     Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance     81  
  11.     Executive Compensation     81  
  12.     Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters     81  
  13.     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence     81  
  14.     Principal Accounting Fees and Services     81  
 
PART IV
  15.     Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules     81  
 EX-10.5
 EX-10.33
 EX-21.1
 EX-23.1
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-31.3
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-32.3


2


Table of Contents

 
PART I
 
Item 1.   Business
 
General
 
P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc. (“P.F. Chang’s” or the “Company”) was incorporated in January 1996 as a Delaware corporation. We conducted our initial public offering in December 1998. We incorporated our subsidiary, Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc., in December 1999 as a Delaware corporation. We report our financial and descriptive information according to two reportable operating segments: P.F. Chang’s China Bistro (“Bistro”) and Pei Wei Asian Diner (“Pei Wei”) (see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Note 19 — Segment Reporting).
 
As of January 3, 2010, we owned and operated 197 full service Bistro restaurants that feature a blend of high quality, Chinese-inspired cuisine and attentive service, in a high-energy contemporary bistro setting. Our restaurants offer intensely flavored, highly memorable culinary creations, prepared from fresh ingredients, including premium herbs and spices imported directly from China. The menu features traditional Chinese offerings and innovative dishes that illustrate the emerging influence of Southeast Asia on modern Chinese cuisine. Our menu is complemented by a full service bar offering an extensive selection of wines, specialty drinks, Asian beers, sake, cappuccino and espresso. We offer superior customer service in a high energy atmosphere and a decor that includes wood and slate floors, life-size replicas of the terra cotta Xi’an warriors and narrative murals depicting scenes of life in ancient China. Additionally, there are two Bistro locations located in Hawaii and two Bistro locations located in international markets that are operated by business partners under licensing agreements.
 
As of January 3, 2010, we also owned and operated 166 quick casual Pei Wei restaurants that serve freshly prepared, wok-seared, contemporary pan-Asian cuisine in a relaxed, warm environment with friendly attentive counter service and take-out flexibility. Pei Wei offers the same spirit of hospitality and commitment to providing fresh, high quality Asian food at a great value that has made our Bistro restaurants successful. Pei Wei opened its first unit in the Phoenix, Arizona metro-area in July 2000.
 
Concept and Strategy
 
Our objectives are to develop and operate a nationwide system of Asian-inspired restaurants that offer guests a sophisticated dining experience, create a loyal customer base that generates a high level of repeat business and provide superior returns to our investors. To achieve our objectives, we strive to offer high quality Asian cuisine in a memorable atmosphere while delivering superior customer service and an excellent dining value. Key to our strategy and success at the restaurant level is a philosophy that allows regional managers, general managers and executive chefs to participate in the profitability of the restaurants for which they have responsibility. We have established Bistro and Pei Wei restaurants in a wide variety of markets across the United States.
 
Menu
 
Bistro
 
The menu for our Bistro restaurants offers a harmony of taste, texture, color and aroma by balancing the Chinese principles of fan and t’sai, which mean “balance” and “moderation”. Fan foods include rice, noodles, grains and dumplings, while t’sai foods include vegetables, meat, poultry and seafood. To further encourage the Chinese principles of fan and t’sai, our menu is served family-style, the traditional Chinese way of dining. Our chefs are trained to produce distinctive Chinese cuisine using traditional recipes from the major culinary regions of China updated with a contemporary twist. The intense heat of Mandarin-style wok cooking sears in the clarity and distinct flavor of fresh ingredients. Slow-roasted Northern-style BBQ spare ribs are prepared in vertical ovens, while handmade shrimp, pork and vegetable dumplings, as well as flavorful fish and vegetables, are prepared in custom-made steamer cabinets. The menu is highlighted by dishes such as Chang’s Spicy Chicken, Mongolian Beef, Dumplings, Chang’s Chicken Lettuce Wraps, Oolong Marinated Sea Bass and Dan Dan Noodles. We also offer an array of vegetarian dishes and are able to modify dishes to accommodate our customers with special dietary needs, including a gluten free menu. No MSG is added to any ingredients at our restaurants.


3


Table of Contents

As a result of our extensive research and development efforts, we periodically change our menu. For example, during 2009 the Bistro introduced Chang’s for Two, a prix-fixe menu offering a four-course meal for two people for $39.95. The menu includes two soups, one starter, two entrees and two mini desserts, all of which can be chosen from an extensive selection of signature dishes and guest favorites. Chang’s for Two allows our customers to enjoy a premium dining experience that offers both enticing culinary cuisine and great value.
 
Additionally, in early 2010, the Bistro added a new daily Happy Hour from 3-6 PM at participating locations that includes appetizers and drink specials priced from $3.00 — $6.00. The Happy Hour menu includes all starters on the Bistro menu as well as a variety of beer, wine, sake and signature cocktails. Our Happy Hour rewards guests by providing appealing, affordable cuisine and drinks at a great value on a daily basis.
 
Entrées at the Bistro range in price from $4.95 — $22.95, and our starters range in price from $3.00 — $13.00. The average check per guest, including alcoholic beverages, is approximately $20.00 to $21.00. Sales of alcoholic beverages, featuring an extensive selection of wine, Asian beer, sake and signature cocktails, have constituted approximately 14% to 15% of total revenues for each of the past three years. Take-away sales comprise approximately 11% of Bistro’s total revenues. Lunch and dinner contribute approximately 32% and 68% of revenues, respectively.
 
Pei Wei
 
The menu at Pei Wei also offers a variety of intensely flavored culinary creations; however, this menu is more concise than that of the Bistro and includes not only Chinese cuisine but other Asian fare as well. As with the Bistro, Pei Wei has a high energy exhibition kitchen featuring made-to-order items using traditional Mandarin-style wok cooking. Along with our handmade dim sum, our guests can order traditional favorites such as Chicken Lettuce Wraps and Mandarin Kung Pao Chicken, while sampling a variety of Asian dishes such as Vietnamese Chicken Salad Rolls, Pad Thai and Spicy Korean Beef.
 
Entrées at Pei Wei range in price from $6.50 to $9.00, with starters ranging from $1.95 to $6.95. The average check per guest at Pei Wei, including beer and wine sales, is approximately $9.00 to $10.00. Sales of alcoholic beverages, featuring limited selection of beer and wine, have constituted approximately 1% to 2% of total revenues for each of the past three years. Take-away sales comprise approximately 39% of Pei Wei’s total revenues. Lunch and dinner contribute approximately 43% and 57% of revenues, respectively.
 
Operations
 
Bistro
 
The Bistro strives to create a sophisticated dining experience through the careful selection, training and supervision of personnel. The staff of a typical Bistro restaurant consists of an Operating Partner, three or four managers, a Culinary Partner, one or two sous chefs and approximately 125 hourly employees, many of whom work part-time. The Operating Partner of each restaurant is responsible for the day-to-day operations of that restaurant, including the hiring, training and development of personnel, as well as operating results. The Culinary Partner is responsible for product quality, purchasing, food costs and kitchen labor costs. We require our Operating Partners and Culinary Partners to have significant experience in the full service restaurant industry.
 
The Bistro has a comprehensive eight-week management development program. This program consists of four weeks of culinary training, including both culinary job functions and culinary management, with the remaining four weeks focused on service strategies, guest relations and administration. All salaried hospitality and culinary management personnel are required to successfully complete all sections of the program. Upon the completion of each four-week section, each trainee must successfully complete a comprehensive certification.
 
The Operating Partners are responsible for selecting hourly employees for their restaurants and are responsible for administering hourly staff training programs that are developed by the training and culinary departments. The hourly employee development program lasts between one and two weeks and focuses on both technical and cultural knowledge.


4


Table of Contents

Additionally, during fiscal 2009, the Bistro implemented a new online ordering system to help facilitate take-away ordering. The Bistro also added online reservation capabilities to its website during 2009.
 
Pei Wei
 
A typical staff at Pei Wei consists of a general manager, a kitchen manager, one or two managers, and approximately 35 hourly employees. Our general managers are responsible for the day-to-day operations of the restaurant, including the hiring, training and development of personnel, as well as operating results. The kitchen manager collaborates with the general manager on product quality, purchasing, food cost and kitchen labor costs.
 
Pei Wei uses a comprehensive nine-week management training program, which consists of six weeks of hands-on culinary functions and culinary management, with the remaining three weeks focusing on service strategies specific to dine-in and take-away service, guest and employee relations and administration. Upon completion of training, each new manager must complete a comprehensive culinary and overall operations certification.
 
Each Pei Wei hourly employee undergoes a week-long comprehensive training program that focuses on the culinary knowledge required for his or her specific position. After completion of the program, each employee is required to pass a test specific to their position prior to serving our guests.
 
Additionally, during fiscal 2009 Pei Wei implemented an online ordering system to help facilitate take-away ordering. Digital menu boards were also installed in all locations to facilitate menu changes and product messaging.
 
Global Brand Development
 
International
 
Based on our belief that our brands would work well in the international market, we are selectively pursuing international expansion of our Bistro restaurants. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we signed two development and licensing agreements with partners who will develop and operate Bistro restaurants in international markets. The first two restaurants under these development and licensing agreements opened in Mexico City and Kuwait City during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. A third development and licensing agreement was also signed during February 2010. We continue to engage in discussions with additional potential partners regarding expansion of the Bistro into various international markets. We expect these relationships to take the form of license agreements under which we would receive an initial territory fee, store opening fees and ongoing royalty revenues based on a percentage of international restaurant sales.
 
Retail
 
In August 2009, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with Unilever to develop and launch a new premium line of frozen Asian-style entrées in the U.S., under the P.F. Chang’s brand. The new products are expected to be available in retail outlets during the first half of fiscal 2010. We will receive ongoing royalty revenues based on a percentage of product sales. These percentages will escalate over the first three years of the agreement.
 
Marketing
 
We focus our business strategy on providing high quality, Asian cuisine prepared by an attentive staff in a distinctive environment at a great value. By focusing on the food, service and ambiance of the restaurant, we strive to create an environment that fosters repeat patronage and encourages word-of-mouth recommendations. We believe that word-of-mouth advertising is a key component in driving guests’ initial trial and subsequent visits, and that creating a great experience for guests will always be the ultimate marketing vehicle.
 
To attract and retain new customers, we have historically utilized a mix of marketing strategies including paid advertising, public relations and local community involvement. While we had used limited radio, print and outdoor advertising in the past, over the past few years we began making more significant investments in these marketing channels in key markets. At the same time, we added online, direct mail, social media, and customer relationship initiatives to the media mix to both drive new customer trials and foster better ongoing communication with our guests. We expect to continue these efforts in fiscal 2010.


5


Table of Contents

Management Information Systems
 
We utilize an integrated information system to manage the flow of information within each restaurant and between the restaurants and the corporate office. This system includes a point-of-sale local area network that helps facilitate the operations of the restaurant by recording sales transactions and printing orders in the appropriate locations within the restaurant. Additionally, the point-of-sale system is utilized to authorize, batch and transmit credit card transactions, to record employee time clock information, to schedule labor and to produce a variety of management reports. Select information that is captured from this system is transmitted to the corporate office on a daily basis, enabling senior management to continually monitor operating results. We believe that our current point-of-sale system will be an adequate platform to support our continued expansion for the foreseeable future.
 
Supply Chain Management
 
Our supply chain management function provides our restaurants with high quality ingredients at competitive prices from reliable sources. Consistent menu specifications, as well as purchasing and receiving guidelines, ensure freshness and quality. Because we utilize only fresh ingredients in all of our menu offerings, inventory is maintained at a modest level. We negotiate short-term and long-term contracts depending on demand for the commodities used in the preparation of our products. These contracts generally average from two to twelve months in duration, though they can be longer at times for certain commodities. With the exception of a portion of our commodities, like produce, we utilize Distribution Market Advantage, a cooperative of multiple food distributors located throughout the United States, as the primary distributor of product to all of our restaurants. We have a non-exclusive contract with Distribution Market Advantage on terms and conditions that we believe are consistent with those made available to similarly situated restaurant companies. Our produce is distributed by a network of local specialty distributors who service our restaurants in adherence to our quality and safety standards. Our most important items are contracted annually to stabilize prices and ensure availability.
 
We believe that competitively priced alternative distribution sources are available should they become necessary. Asian-specific ingredients, primarily spices and sauces, are usually sourced directly from Hong Kong, China, Taiwan and Thailand. We have developed an extensive network of suppliers in order to maintain an adequate supply of items that conform to our brand and product specifications.
 
Competition
 
The restaurant business is intensely competitive with respect to food quality, price-value relationships, ambiance, service and location, and many existing restaurants compete with us at each of our locations. Key competitive factors in the industry include the quality and value of the food, quality of service, price, dining experience, restaurant location and the ambiance of the facilities. For the Bistro, our primary competitors include mid-priced, full service casual dining restaurants. For Pei Wei, our main competitors are other value-priced, quick service concepts as well as locally owned and operated Asian restaurants.
 
There are a number of well-established competitors with substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than ours. In addition, many of our competitors are well established in the markets where our operations are, or in which they may be, located. While we believe that our restaurants are distinctive in design and operating concept, other companies may develop restaurants that operate with similar concepts. Additionally, the rising popularity of Asian food may result in increased competition from non-Asian restaurants as well as other food outlets, such as supermarkets, as they increase their number of Asian-inspired menu offerings.
 
Employees
 
At January 3, 2010, we employed approximately 26,000 persons, approximately 300 of whom were home office and field personnel, approximately 1,700 of whom were unit management personnel and the remainder of whom were hourly restaurant personnel. Our employees are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be good.


6


Table of Contents

Unit Economics
 
We believe that unit economics are critical to the long-term success of any restaurant concept. Accordingly, we focus on unit-level returns over time as a key measurement of our success or failure. For analysis purposes, we group our restaurants by the year in which they opened. We then compare each “class” to its peers over time as well as to the performance of the entire system. These unit economics are available on our website: www.pfcb.com.
 
Access to Information
 
Our Internet address is www.pfcb.com. We make available at this address, free of charge, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports, and beneficial ownership reports filed by our directors and officers pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
 
Item 1A.   Risk Factors
 
The failure of our existing or new restaurants to achieve expected results could have a negative impact on our revenues and financial results, including potential impairment of the long-lived assets of our restaurants, and could negatively impact our stock price.
 
We operated 197 full service Bistro restaurants and 166 quick casual Pei Wei restaurants as of January 3, 2010, 15 of which opened within the last twelve months. The results achieved by these restaurants may not be indicative of longer term performance or the potential market acceptance of restaurants in other locations. There can be no assurance that any new restaurant that we open will have similar operating results to those of prior restaurants. Our new restaurants commonly take several months to reach planned operating levels due to inefficiencies typically associated with new restaurants, including the training of new personnel, lack of market awareness, inability to hire sufficient staff and other factors. The failure of our existing or new restaurants to perform as expected could have a significant negative impact.
 
We are subject to a number of significant risks that might cause our actual results to vary materially from our historical results or future projections including:
 
  •  lower customer traffic or average guest check, which negatively impacts comparable store sales, net revenues, operating income, operating margins and earnings per share, due to:
 
  •  the impact of initiatives by competitors and increased competition generally;
 
  •  lack of customer acceptance of new menu items or potential price increases necessary to cover higher input costs;
 
  •  unfavorable general economic conditions in the markets in which we operate, including, but not limited to, downturns in the housing market, higher interest rates, higher unemployment rates, lower disposable income due to higher energy or other consumer costs, lower consumer confidence, and other events or factors that adversely affect consumer spending;
 
  •  customers trading down to lower priced items and/or shifting to competitors with lower priced products; or
 
  •  changes in consumer preferences or declines in general consumer demand for Asian menu items
 
  •  cost increases that are either wholly or partially beyond our control, such as:
 
  •  costs for commodities that we do not or cannot effectively hedge;
 
  •  labor costs such as increased health care costs, general market wage levels and workers’ compensation insurance costs;
 
  •  operating expenses, such as utilities and other expenses that are impacted by energy price fluctuations;
 
  •  fair value fluctuations related to our cash-settled share-based compensation awards;


7


Table of Contents

 
  •  litigation against the Company, particularly class action litigation;
 
  •  construction costs associated with new store openings;
 
  •  information technology costs and other logistical resources necessary to maintain and support the global growth of our business; and
 
  •  material interruptions in our supply chain, such as a material interruption of ingredient supply due to the failures of third-party suppliers, or interruptions in service by common carriers that ship goods within our distribution channels
 
Additionally, we have historically experienced variability in the amount and percentage of revenues attributable to preopening expenses. We typically incur the most significant portion of preopening expenses associated with a given restaurant within the two months immediately preceding and the month of the opening of the restaurant. Our experience has been that labor and operating costs associated with a newly opened restaurant for the first several months of operation are materially greater than what can be expected after that time, both in aggregate dollars and as a percentage of revenues. Accordingly, the volume and timing of new restaurant openings has had, and may continue to have, a meaningful impact on preopening expenses as well as labor and operating costs. Due to the foregoing factors, results for any one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any other quarter or for a full fiscal year and these fluctuations may cause our operating results to be below expectations of public market analysts and investors, adversely impacting our stock price.
 
Changes in general economic and political conditions could affect consumer spending and may harm our revenues, operating results or liquidity.
 
General weak economic conditions may continue throughout fiscal 2010. As a result, our customers may continue to remain apprehensive about the economy and maintain or further reduce their already lowered level of discretionary spending. This could impact the frequency with which our customers choose to dine out or the amount they spend on meals while dining out, thereby decreasing our revenues and potentially negatively affecting our operating results. Additionally, we believe there is a risk that if the current negative economic conditions persist for a long period of time or become more pervasive, consumers might make long-lasting changes to their discretionary spending behavior, including dining out less frequently on a more permanent basis.
 
Changes in government legislation may increase our labor costs and have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
 
A substantial number of our restaurant personnel are hourly workers whose wage rates are affected by increases in the federal or state minimum wage or changes to tip credits. Tip credits are the amounts an employer is permitted to assume an employee receives in tips when the employer calculates the employee’s hourly wage for minimum wage compliance purposes. FICA tip credits resulting from tip credit reporting are also a significant factor when calculating the Company’s effective tax rate. Mandated increases in minimum wage levels and changes to the tip credit have recently been and continue to be proposed and implemented at both federal and state government levels. Additionally, as minimum wage rates increase, we may need to increase not only the wages of our minimum wage employees but also the wages paid to employees at wage rates that are above minimum wage. Future legislation that increases minimum wage rates or changes allowable tip credits may increase our labor costs or effective tax rate and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
 
Additionally, potential changes in labor legislation, including all or parts of the Employee Free Choice Act (“EFCA”), could result in portions of our workforce being subjected to greater organized labor influence. The EFCA, also referred to as the “card check” bill, could impact the nature of labor relations in the United States, specifically, how union elections and contract negotiations are conducted. The EFCA aims to make it easier for unions to form, and employers of unionized employees may face mandatory, binding arbitration of labor scheduling, costs and standards, which could increase the costs of doing business. Although we do not currently have any union employees, EFCA or similar labor legislation could have an adverse effect on our business and


8


Table of Contents

financial results by imposing requirements that could potentially increase costs, reduce flexibility and impact our ability to service our guests.
 
We are dependent on sales concentrated in certain geographic areas as well as sales generated by corporate spending.
 
Our financial performance is highly dependent on restaurants located in California, Arizona, Nevada and Florida which comprise one-third of our total store population. Additionally, restaurants located in Texas comprise almost 20 percent of our total store population. In recent years, certain of these states have been more negatively impacted by the housing downturn, unemployment and the overall economic crisis than other geographic areas. As a result, we have seen a more substantial decline in guest traffic at some of our restaurants in these locations, which has adversely affected the operations of the company as a whole. If we are unable to improve operating performance in these geographic areas, our financial results will continue to be adversely affected.
 
Our business is also influenced by the level of corporate travel and entertainment spending by businesses as a significant portion of our sales is generated by guests conducting business at our restaurants. During fiscal 2009, there was a considerable reduction in business travel and corporate spending in general, which negatively impacted our revenues. Such reduced spending could continue to have a significant negative impact on our financial results until such time as corporate spending increases.
 
Intense competition in the restaurant industry could prevent us from increasing or sustaining our revenues and profitability.
 
The restaurant industry is intensely competitive with respect to food quality, price-value relationships, ambiance, service and location, and many restaurants compete with us at each of our locations. Our competitors at the Bistro concept include mid-price, full service, casual dining restaurants. For Pei Wei, our main competitors are other value-priced, quick-service concepts as well as locally owned and operated Asian restaurants. There are a number of well-established competitors with substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than ours, and many of our competitors are well established in the markets where we have restaurants, or in which we intend to locate restaurants. Additionally, other companies may develop restaurants that operate with similar concepts and the rising popularity of Asian food may result in increased competition from non-Asian restaurants as well as other food outlets.
 
Any inability to successfully compete with the other restaurants in our markets may prevent us from increasing or sustaining our revenues and profitability and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We may also need to modify or refine elements of our restaurant system to evolve our concepts in order to compete with popular new restaurant formats or concepts that develop from time to time. We cannot ensure that we will be successful in implementing these modifications or that these modifications will not reduce our profitability.
 
Global Brand Development initiatives could negatively impact our brand.
 
Our business expansion into international markets and retail product licensing could create new risks to our brand and reputation. We believe that we have selected high-caliber International operating partners with significant experience in restaurant operations; however, there is risk that our brand could be harmed if customers have negative experiences at International Bistro locations due to issues with food quality or operational execution. Our new line of premium frozen Asian-style entrées is expected to be available in retail outlets during fiscal 2010. We believe that this new retail product offering is a growth opportunity that allows our brand to reach more customers more often. Though we believe our guests will view it as a different experience from dining in our restaurants, there is a risk that guests may be inclined to visit our restaurants less frequently due to the availability of similar products in retail outlets or they may develop a lower opinion of our brand due to issues with food quality or overall product expectations. If customers have negative perceptions or experiences at International restaurants or with retail products, our brand value could suffer which could have an adverse effect on our business.


9


Table of Contents

Damage to our brands or reputation could negatively impact our business.
 
Our success depends substantially on the value of our brands and our reputation for offering a high quality, memorable experience to our guests. Our brands have been highly rated in annual consumer studies such as Restaurants & Institutions’ annual Choice in Chains survey in which P.F. Chang’s won honors in the casual dining and Asian categories as well as across numerous demographic groups during fiscal 2009. We believe that we must protect and grow the value of our brands to continue to be successful in the future. Any incident that erodes consumer trust in or affinity for our brands could significantly reduce their value. If consumers perceive or experience a reduction in food quality, service, ambiance or in any way believes we failed to deliver a consistently positive experience, our brand value could suffer which could have an adverse effect on our business.
 
Additionally, multi-unit food service businesses such as ours can be materially and adversely affected by widespread negative publicity of any type, particularly regarding food quality, illness or public health issues (such as epidemics or the prospect of a pandemic), safety, injury or other health concerns. We have taken steps to mitigate each of these risks. To minimize the risk of food-borne illness, we have implemented a HACCP system for managing food safety and quality. Nevertheless, these risks cannot be completely eliminated and any outbreak of illness attributed to our restaurants or within the food service industry in general could cause a decline in our sales and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
 
Litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business.
 
We are, from time to time, the subject of complaints or litigation from guests alleging food borne illnesses, injuries or other food quality, health or operational concerns. We may be adversely affected by publicity resulting from such allegations, regardless of whether such allegations are valid or whether we are ultimately determined to be liable. We are also subject to complaints or allegations from former or prospective employees from time to time as well as vendors, landlords, and other third-parties. A lawsuit or claim could result in an adverse decision against us that could have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, the costs and expense of defending ourselves against lawsuits or claims, regardless of merit, could have an adverse impact on our profitability and could cause variability in our results compared to expectations.
 
We are subject to state “dram shop” laws and regulations, which generally provide that a person injured by an intoxicated person may seek to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served alcoholic beverages to such person. While we carry liquor liability coverage as part of our existing comprehensive general liability insurance, we may still be subject to a judgment in excess of our insurance coverage and we may not be able to obtain or continue to maintain such insurance coverage at reasonable costs, or at all.
 
Adverse public or medical opinions about the health effects of consuming our products or new information or attitudes regarding diet and health could result in changes in regulations and consumer eating habits that could adversely affect our business.
 
Multi-unit restaurant operators and foodservice operations have received more scrutiny from regulators and health organizations in recent years relating to the health effects of consuming certain products. Regulations and consumer eating habits may change as a result of new information or attitudes regarding diet and health. Although our menu provides a range of healthy options, an unfavorable report on our menu ingredients, the size of our portions or the consumption of our menu items could influence the demand for our offerings. These changes may include regulations that impact the ingredients and nutritional content of our menu items. For example, a number of states, counties and cities are enacting menu labeling laws requiring multi-unit restaurant operators to make certain nutritional information available to guests or restrict the sales of certain types of ingredients in restaurants. The success of our restaurant operations is dependent, in part, upon our ability to effectively respond to changes in consumer health and disclosure regulations and to adapt our menu offerings to trends in eating habits. If consumer health regulations or consumer eating habits change significantly, we may be required to modify or delete certain menu items. We may experience higher costs associated with the implementation and oversight of such changes. To the extent we are unable to respond with appropriate changes to our menu offerings, it could materially affect customer demand and have an adverse impact on our business.


10


Table of Contents

Our failure to comply with governmental regulations could harm our business and our reputation.
 
We are subject to regulation by federal agencies and to licensing and regulation by state and local health, sanitation, building, zoning, safety, fire and other departments relating to the development and operation of restaurants. These regulations include matters relating to:
 
  •  the environment;
 
  •  building construction;
 
  •  zoning requirements;
 
  •  the preparation and sale of food and alcoholic beverages;
 
  •  employment; and
 
  •  integrity and security of data.
 
Our facilities are licensed and subject to regulation under state and local fire, health and safety codes. The development and construction of additional restaurants will be subject to compliance with applicable zoning, land use and environmental regulations. We may not be able to obtain necessary licenses or other approvals on a cost-effective and timely basis in order to construct and develop restaurants in the future.
 
Various federal and state labor laws govern our operations and our relationship with our employees, including minimum wage, overtime, working conditions, fringe benefit and citizenship requirements. In particular, we are subject to the regulations of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services, or BCIS. The United States Congress has recently been considering changes to Federal immigration laws and various states, some of which where we have significant operations, are also in the process of considering or have already adopted new immigration laws. Some of these new laws may adversely affect our operations by increasing our obligations for compliance and oversight. Although we require all workers to provide us with the government-specified documentation evidencing their employment eligibility, some of our employees may, without our knowledge, be unauthorized workers. Unauthorized workers are subject to seizure and deportation and may subject us to fines, penalties or loss of our business license in certain jurisdictions. Any material disruption of our business, as a result of seizure of our workers, changes in immigration law, or significantly increased labor costs at our facilities in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
 
In fiscal 2009, approximately 14 percent of our revenues at the Bistro and 1 percent of revenues at Pei Wei were attributable to the sale of alcoholic beverages. We are required to comply with the alcohol licensing requirements of the federal government, states and municipalities where our restaurants are located. Alcoholic beverage control regulations require applications to state authorities and, in certain locations, county and municipal authorities for a license and permit to sell alcoholic beverages. Typically, licenses must be renewed annually and may be revoked or suspended for cause at any time. Alcoholic beverage control regulations relate to numerous aspects of the daily operations of the restaurants, including minimum age of guests and employees, hours of operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing, inventory control and handling, storage and dispensing of alcoholic beverages. If we fail to comply with federal, state or local regulations, our licenses may be revoked and we may be forced to terminate the sale of alcoholic beverages at one or more of our restaurants.
 
We receive and maintain certain personal information about our guests and employees. The use of this information by us is regulated at the federal and state levels. If our security and information systems are compromised or our business associates fail to comply with these laws and regulations and this information is obtained by unauthorized persons or used inappropriately, it could adversely affect our reputation, as well as results of operations, and could result in litigation against us or the imposition of penalties. As privacy and information security laws and regulations change, we may incur additional costs to ensure we remain in compliance.
 
The federal Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in public accommodations and employment. We are required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and regulations relating to accommodating the needs of the disabled in connection with the construction of new facilities and with significant renovations of existing facilities.


11


Table of Contents

Failure to comply with these and other regulations could negatively impact our business and our reputation.
 
Changes in food costs could negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.
 
Our profitability is dependent in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food costs. Other than for a portion of our commodities, such as produce, which are purchased locally by each restaurant, we rely on Distribution Market Advantage, a cooperative of multiple food distributors located throughout the nation, as the primary distributor of our ingredients. We have a non-exclusive contract with Distribution Market Advantage on terms and conditions that we believe are consistent with those made available to similarly situated restaurant companies. Although we believe that alternative distribution sources are available, any increase in distribution prices or failure to perform by the Distribution Market Advantage could cause our food costs to fluctuate. Any disruption in the supply of specialty items from China due to quality or availability issues could also cause our food costs to fluctuate. Additional factors beyond our control, including adverse weather conditions and governmental regulation, may affect our food costs. We may not be able to anticipate and react to changing food costs through our purchasing practices and menu price adjustments in the future, and failure to do so could negatively impact our revenues and results of operations.
 
Our inability to retain key personnel could negatively impact our business.
 
Our success will continue to be highly dependent on our key operating officers and employees. We must continue to attract, retain and motivate a sufficient number of qualified management and operating personnel, including regional managers, general managers and executive chefs, to maintain consistency in the quality and atmosphere of our restaurants. Additionally, the ability of these key personnel to maintain consistency in the quality of our product offerings and service and atmosphere of our restaurants is a critical factor in our success. Any failure to attract, retain and motivate key personnel may harm our reputation and result in a loss of business.
 
Development is critical to our long-term success.
 
Critical to our long-term future success is our ability to successfully expand our operations. We have expanded from seven restaurants at the end of 1996 to 363 restaurants as of January 3, 2010. We expect to open three to five new Bistro restaurants and three to five new Pei Wei restaurants during fiscal 2010. Our ability to expand successfully will depend on a number of factors, including:
 
  •  identification and availability of suitable locations;
 
  •  competition for restaurant sites;
 
  •  negotiation of favorable lease arrangements;
 
  •  timely development of commercial, residential, street or highway construction near our restaurants;
 
  •  management of the costs of construction and development of new restaurants;
 
  •  securing required governmental approvals and permits;
 
  •  recruitment of qualified operating personnel, particularly managers and chefs;
 
  •  weather conditions;
 
  •  competition in new markets; and
 
  •  general economic conditions, including those arising from the current economic crisis described above.
 
The opening of additional restaurants in the future will depend in part upon our ability to generate sufficient funds from operations or to obtain sufficient equity or debt financing on favorable terms to support our expansion as well as the availability of high-quality commercial real estate projects of the type we typically target for new locations. We may not be able to open our planned new restaurants on a timely basis, if at all, and, if opened, these restaurants may not be operated profitably. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, delays in restaurant openings from time to time. Delays or failures in opening planned new restaurants could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.


12


Table of Contents

Federal, state and local tax rules can adversely impact our results of operations and financial position.
 
We are subject to federal, state and local taxes in the U.S. Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, if the IRS or other taxing authority disagrees with the positions we have taken on our tax returns, we could have additional tax liability, including interest and penalties. If material, payment of such additional amounts upon final adjudication of any disputes could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.
 
Complying with new tax rules, laws or regulations could impact our financial condition and increases to federal or state statutory tax rates and other changes in tax laws, rules or regulations may increase our effective tax rate. Any increase in our effective tax rate could have a material impact on our financial results.
 
 
Fluctuating insurance requirements and costs could negatively impact our profitability and projections.
 
The cost of workers’ compensation insurance, general liability insurance and directors and officers’ liability insurance fluctuates based on market conditions and availability as well as our historical trends. We self-insure a substantial portion of our workers’ compensation and general liability costs and unfavorable changes in trends could have a negative impact on our profitability.
 
Additionally, health insurance costs in general have risen significantly over the past few years and are expected to continue to increase in 2010. These increases, as well as potential legislation requirements for employers to provide specified levels of health insurance to all employees, could have a negative impact on our profitability if we are not able to offset the effect of such increases with plan modifications and cost control measures, or by continuing to improve our operating efficiencies.
 
Our marketing programs may not be successful.
 
We have significantly increased in our marketing expenditures over the past few years and expect to continue investing in campaigns and initiatives designed to attract and retain guests. These efforts may not be successful, resulting in expenses incurred without the benefit of higher revenues.
 
Potential labor shortages may delay planned openings or damage customer relations.
 
Our success will continue to depend on our ability to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees, including kitchen staff and wait staff, to work our restaurants. Our inability to recruit and retain qualified individuals may delay the planned openings of new restaurants while high employee turnover in existing restaurants may negatively impact customer service and customer relations, resulting in an adverse effect on our revenues or results of operations.
 
The inability to develop and construct our restaurants within projected budgets and time periods could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
 
Each of our restaurants is distinctively designed to accommodate particular characteristics of each location and to blend local or regional design themes with our principal trade dress and other common design elements. This presents each location with its own development and construction risks. Many factors may affect the costs and timeframes associated with the development and construction of our restaurants, including:
 
  •  landlord delays;
 
  •  labor disputes;
 
  •  shortages of materials and skilled labor;
 
  •  weather interference;
 
  •  unforeseen engineering problems;
 
  •  environmental problems;


13


Table of Contents

 
  •  construction or zoning problems;
 
  •  local government regulations;
 
  •  modifications in design to the size and scope of the projects; and
 
  •  other unanticipated increases in costs, any of which could give rise to delays or cost overruns.
 
If we are not able to develop additional restaurants within anticipated budgets or time periods, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.
 
The seasonality of our business could result in fluctuations in our financial performance
 
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations. Our sales volumes are generally higher in the winter months and lower in the summer months, which can cause fluctuations in our operating results from quarter-to-quarter within a fiscal year. As a result, results of operations for any single quarter are not indicative of results that may be achieved for a full fiscal year. Additionally, quarterly fluctuations in our results can impact the amount of quarterly cash dividend payments, which are based on a fixed percentage of net income.
 
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
 
Some of the statements in this Form 10-K and the documents we incorporate by reference constitute forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terms such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “intend”, “forecast”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. The forward-looking statements contained in this document involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and situations that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these statements. Factors that might cause actual events or results to differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements may include the matters listed under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Form 10-K, including, but not limited to, failure of our existing or new restaurants to achieve predicted results, changes in general economic and political conditions and changes in government legislation may increase our labor costs. Because we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements.
 
Item 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.


14


Table of Contents

Item 2.   Properties
 
Our Bistro restaurants average 6,900 square feet and our Pei Wei restaurants average 3,100 square feet. The following table lists the number of existing Bistro and Pei Wei locations by state as of January 3, 2010:
 
                         
State
  Bistro     Pei Wei     Total  
 
Alabama
    2             2  
Arizona
    9       19       28  
Arkansas
    2       1       3  
California
    37       14       51  
Colorado
    7       6       13  
Connecticut
    2             2  
Florida
    14       18       32  
Georgia
    5             5  
Idaho
    1             1  
Illinois
    5             5  
Indiana
    2             2  
Iowa
    1             1  
Kansas
    1       3       4  
Kentucky
    2             2  
Louisiana
    2             2  
Massachusetts
    6             6  
Maryland
    6       2       8  
Michigan
    5       7       12  
Minnesota
    2       3       5  
Mississippi
    1             1  
Missouri
    3       2       5  
Nebraska
    1             1  
Nevada
    5       3       8  
New Jersey
    6       2       8  
New Mexico
    1       2       3  
New York
    5             5  
North Carolina
    6       4       10  
Ohio
    8       3       11  
Oklahoma
    2       6       8  
Oregon
    4             4  
Pennsylvania
    6       2       8  
South Carolina
    2             2  
Tennessee
    5       7       12  
Texas
    17       53       70  
Utah
    2       4       6  
Virginia
    5       5       10  
Washington
    5             5  
Wisconsin
    2             2  
                         
      197       166       363  
                         


15


Table of Contents

Additionally, two international Bistro restaurants were opened in Mexico City and Kuwait City during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 under international development and licensing agreements. Two Bistro restaurants are also operated in Hawaii under a joint venture arrangement in which we own a noncontrolling interest.
 
Our home office is located in a 50,000 square foot office building in Scottsdale, Arizona. We purchased the land and building during 2004.
 
Expansion Strategy and Site Selection
 
We have historically developed Bistro and Pei Wei restaurants in both new and existing markets utilizing an expansion strategy targeted at metropolitan areas throughout the United States. Within each targeted metropolitan area, we identify specific areas with high traffic patterns and suitable demographic characteristics, including population density, consumer attitudes and household income. Within an appropriate area, we evaluate specific sites that provide visibility, accessibility and exposure to traffic volume. Our site criteria are flexible, as is evidenced by the variety of environments and facilities in which we currently operate. These facilities include freestanding buildings, regional malls, urban properties and entertainment and strip centers.
 
We plan to open three to five new Bistro restaurants during fiscal 2010 primarily located in existing markets. Additionally, we plan to open three to five new Pei Wei restaurants during fiscal 2010 in new and existing markets. As of the date of this Form 10-K, we had opened one of the new Pei Wei restaurants and none of the new Bistro restaurants planned for fiscal 2010.
 
Bistros typically range in size from 6,000 to 7,500 square feet, and require an average total capitalized investment of approximately $3.5 million to $4.0 million per restaurant (net of estimated tenant incentives). This total investment includes the capitalized lease value of the property, which can vary greatly depending on the specific location. We expect that our planned future restaurants will require, on average, a total cash investment per restaurant of approximately $2.5 million to $3.0 million (net of estimated tenant incentives). Preopening expenses are expected to average approximately $350,000 to $400,000 per Bistro restaurant during fiscal 2010.
 
Pei Wei restaurants typically range in size from 2,800 to 3,400 square feet and require an average total capitalized investment of approximately $1.5 million per restaurant (net of estimated tenant incentives). This total investment cost includes the capitalized lease value of the property, which can vary greatly depending on the specific location. We expect that our planned future restaurants will require, on average, a total cash investment per restaurant of approximately $750,000 to $850,000 (net of estimated tenant incentives). Preopening expenses are expected to average approximately $140,000 to $160,000 per Pei Wei restaurant during fiscal 2010.
 
We currently lease the sites for all of our Bistro and Pei Wei restaurants and do not intend to purchase real estate for our sites in the future. Current restaurant leases have expiration dates ranging from 2010 to 2025, with the majority of the leases providing for at least one five-year renewal option. We are currently negotiating with the landlords on lease renewal options for three restaurant leases that are scheduled to expire in 2010. Generally, our leases provide for minimum annual rent, and most leases require additional rent based on a percentage of sales volume in excess of minimum contractual levels at the particular location. Most of our leases require us to pay the costs of insurance, property taxes, and a portion of the lessor’s operating costs. We do not anticipate any difficulties renewing existing leases as they expire.
 
Item 3.  Legal Proceedings
 
We are engaged in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business and believe that the ultimate outcome of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial position.
 
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
None.


16


Table of Contents

 
PART II
 
Item 5.   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol PFCB.
 
The following table sets forth the high and low price per share of our common stock for each quarterly period for our two most recent fiscal years:
 
                 
Quarter Ended
  High     Low  
 
March 30, 2008
  $ 32.48     $ 20.41  
June 29, 2008
  $ 33.00     $ 22.30  
September 28, 2008
  $ 30.00     $ 21.15  
December 28, 2008
  $ 24.14     $ 14.51  
March 29, 2009
  $ 25.49     $ 16.51  
June 28, 2009
  $ 34.49     $ 21.73  
September 27, 2009
  $ 36.98     $ 29.56  
January 3, 2010
  $ 39.57     $ 29.18  
 
We have not historically paid any cash dividends. During February 2010, the Board of Directors approved the initiation of a quarterly variable cash dividend based on our desire to consistently return excess cash flow to its shareholders. The amount of the cash dividend will be computed based on 45% of quarterly net income and is expected to total approximately $0.90 per share during fiscal 2010. Based on seasonal fluctuations in quarterly net income, the amount of cash dividend payments, which are based on a fixed percentage of net income, may fluctuate between quarters.
 
On February 12, 2010, there were 112 holders of record of P.F. Chang’s common stock.
 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
Our Board of Directors has authorized programs to repurchase our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open market, pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 trading plans or in private transactions at prevailing market prices. Under previous share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors, we have repurchased a total of 5.1 million shares of our common stock for $146.0 million at an average price of $28.83 since July 2006. Included in this total are 1.4 million shares of our common stock repurchased during 2009 for $39.7 million at an average price of $27.73.
 
In December 2009, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase up to $100.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open market or in private transactions at prevailing market prices over the next two years. We intend to use cash on hand to repurchase shares. We did not repurchase any shares under this authorization during fiscal 2009.
 
The following table sets forth our share repurchases of common stock during each period in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009:
 
                                         
                Total Number of
             
    Total
          Shares Purchased
    Maximum Dollar Value of
       
    Number of
    Average
    as Part of Publicly
    Shares that May Yet Be
       
    Shares
    Price Paid
    Announced
    Purchased Under the
       
Period
  Purchased     per Share     Programs     Programs        
 
September 28, 2009 — November 1, 2009
    112,409     $ 33.76       112,409     $ 7,040,833          
November 2, 2009 — November 29, 2009
    93,450     $ 31.25       93,450     $ 4,120,520          
November 30, 2009 — January 3, 2010(1)
    104,600     $ 35.95       104,600     $ 100,000,000          
                                         
Total
    310,459               310,459     $ 100,000,000          
                                         
 
 
(1) Our previous share repurchase program expired on December 31, 2009. Prior to program expiration, we repurchased an additional 6,900 shares at an average price of $38.71; however, these shares did not settle until after January 3, 2010 and thus are not included in the amounts shown for the December purchases period. The maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the programs reflects our new share repurchase program, which was authorized in December 2009.


17


Table of Contents

Performance Graph
 
The following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return on the Company’s common stock with the cumulative total returns of the Nasdaq Composite Index and the Russell 2000 Index, in each case assuming an initial investment of $100 on January 2, 2005 and no dividend payments. Historical performance should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns.
 
Comparison of Cumulative Total Return from January 2, 2005 through January 3, 2010
 


18


Table of Contents

Item 6.   Selected Financial Data
 
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
                                         
    Fiscal Year(1)  
    2009     2008     2007     2006     2005  
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
Statement of Income Data:
                                       
Revenues
  $ 1,228,179     $ 1,198,124     $ 1,084,193     $ 932,116     $ 806,838  
Costs and expenses:
                                       
Cost of sales
    326,421       325,630       297,242       254,923       223,966  
Labor
    401,583       396,911       364,074       307,573       265,274  
Operating
    203,859       198,967       172,147       145,309       121,849  
Occupancy
    70,635       69,809       62,164       51,958       42,586  
General and administrative
    82,749       77,488       66,968       56,030       41,117  
Depreciation and amortization
    74,429       68,711       55,988       44,378       36,782  
Preopening expense
    3,919       8,457       14,310       11,922       9,102  
Partner investment expense
    (629 )     (354 )     (2,012 )     4,371       4,800  
                                         
Total costs and expenses
    1,162,966       1,145,619       1,030,881       876,464       745,476  
                                         
Income from operations
    65,213       52,505       53,312       55,652       61,362  
Interest and other income (expense), net
    (1,637 )     (3,362 )     (100 )     1,315       1,841  
                                         
Income from continuing operations before taxes
    63,576       49,143       53,212       56,967       63,203  
Provision for income taxes
    (18,492 )     (12,193 )     (12,420 )     (14,078 )     (17,033 )
                                         
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
    45,084       36,950       40,792       42,889       46,170  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(2)(3)
    (479 )     (7,591 )     (4,560 )     (1,520 )     (147 )
                                         
Net income
    44,605       29,359       36,232       41,369       46,023  
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    1,408       1,933       4,169       8,116       8,227  
                                         
Net income attributable to PFCB
  $ 43,197     $ 27,426     $ 32,063     $ 33,253     $ 37,796  
                                         
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common stockholders per share:
                                       
Basic
  $ 1.90     $ 1.47     $ 1.44     $ 1.33     $ 1.44  
                                         
Diluted
  $ 1.87     $ 1.45     $ 1.41     $ 1.30     $ 1.41  
                                         
Weighted average shares used in computation:
                                       
Basic
    22,986       23,776       25,473       26,075       26,271  
                                         
Diluted
    23,413       24,080       25,899       26,737       27,000  
                                         
Amounts attributable to PFCB:
                                       
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
  $ 43,676     $ 35,017     $ 36,623     $ 34,773     $ 37,943  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (479 )     (7,591 )     (4,560 )     (1,520 )     (147 )
                                         
Net income attributable to PFCB
  $ 43,197     $ 27,426     $ 32,063     $ 33,253     $ 37,796  
                                         
 


19


Table of Contents

                                         
    As of
    As of
    As of
    As of
    As of
 
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
    December 31,
    January 1,
 
    2010     2008     2007     2006     2006  
    (In thousands)  
 
Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 63,499     $ 40,951     $ 24,055     $ 31,589     $ 31,948  
Short-term investments (including restricted short-term investments)
                            42,410  
Total assets
    652,150       667,363       622,630       514,045       474,859  
Long-term debt
    1,212       82,496       90,828       13,723       5,360  
Total PFCB common stockholders’ equity
    335,349       320,826       293,887       289,525       293,898  
 
 
(1) We operate on a 52/53-week year, with the fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. Fiscal year 2009 was comprised of 53 weeks. Fiscal years 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005 each were comprised of 52 weeks.
 
(2) As a result of our decision to exit operations of Taneko, the results of Taneko (including a related asset impairment charge recognized during fiscal 2007) were classified as a discontinued operation for all periods presented as discussed further in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
 
(3) As a result of our decision to close 10 Pei Wei stores in fiscal 2008, the results of those 10 Pei Wei stores (including related asset impairment, lease termination and severance charges recognized during fiscal 2009 and 2008) were classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented as discussed further in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
 
No cash dividends were paid during any of the five previous years.
 
Item 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Overview
 
The following section presents an overview of our restaurant concepts, other business lines, our growth strategy and challenges we face. A summary of our 2009 financial results and our 2010 outlook are also presented.
 
Restaurants
 
We own and operate two restaurant concepts in the Asian niche: P.F. Chang’s China Bistro (“Bistro”) and Pei Wei Asian Diner (“Pei Wei”). On August 1, 2008, we sold the long-lived assets of Taneko Japanese Tavern (“Taneko”), a third restaurant concept developed in 2006, which has been classified as a discontinued operation in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the end of fiscal 2007.
 
Bistro
 
As of January 3, 2010, we owned and operated 197 full service Bistro restaurants that feature a blend of high quality, traditional Chinese cuisine and attentive service in a high energy contemporary bistro setting. P.F. Chang’s was formed in early 1996 with the acquisition of the four original Bistro restaurants and the hiring of an experienced management team. Utilizing a partnership management philosophy, we embarked on a strategic expansion of the concept targeted at major metropolitan areas throughout the United States. We own and operate all of our restaurants in the U.S. with the exception of two Bistro restaurants located in Hawaii which are operated under a joint venture arrangement in which we own a noncontrolling interest. Additionally, two international Bistro restaurants were opened in Mexico City and Kuwait City during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 under international development and licensing agreements.
 
Pei Wei
 
As of January 3, 2010, we also owned and operated 166 quick casual Pei Wei restaurants that serve freshly prepared, wok-seared, contemporary pan-Asian cuisine in a relaxed, warm environment with friendly attentive

20


Table of Contents

counter service and take-out flexibility. We opened our first Pei Wei restaurant in July 2000 in the Phoenix, Arizona area and have expanded the concept significantly since that time. We closed 10 Pei Wei restaurants during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the results of these restaurants are reported within discontinued operations in our consolidated income statements for all periods presented. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
 
Global Brand Development
 
International
 
We are selectively pursuing international expansion of our Bistro restaurants. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we signed two development and licensing agreements with partners who will develop and operate Bistro restaurants in international markets. We expect these relationships to take the form of license agreements under which we would receive an initial territory fee, store opening fees and ongoing royalty revenues based on a percentage of international restaurant sales.
 
The first development and licensing agreement was signed with M.H. Alshaya, the Middle East’s leading retailer, to develop 34 Bistro restaurants throughout the Middle East over the next 10 years. The first restaurant opened in Kuwait City during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
 
The second development and licensing agreement was signed with Alsea S.A.B. de C.V., the leading quick service restaurant operator in Mexico, to develop 30 Bistro restaurants in Mexico over the next 10 years. The first restaurant opened in Mexico City during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Additionally, during February 2010, we signed a development and licensing agreement with Global Restaurant Concepts, Inc., a leading casual dining operator in the Philippines, to develop eight restaurants over the next five years. The first restaurant is scheduled to open in Manila during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
 
We continue to engage in discussions with additional potential partners regarding expansion of the Bistro into various international markets.
 
Retail
 
In August 2009, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with Unilever to develop and launch a new premium line of frozen Asian-style entrées in the U.S., under the P.F. Chang’s brand. The new products are expected to be available in retail outlets during the first half of fiscal 2010. We will receive ongoing royalty revenues based on a percentage of product sales.
 
Other Ventures
 
In August 2009, we announced an agreement with FRC Balance LLC, d/b/a True Food Kitchen, to provide debt capital for the early-stage development of True Food Kitchen restaurants. The agreement provides for up to a $10.0 million loan facility to develop True Food Kitchen restaurants and can, under certain conditions, be converted by us into a majority equity position in True Food Kitchen. As of January 3, 2010, no borrowings were outstanding under the loan facility.
 
Our strategy
 
Our objective is to be the best operator of Asian restaurants as viewed by our guests and our employees. We aim to develop and operate a nationwide system of Asian-inspired restaurants that offer guests a sophisticated dining experience, create a loyal customer base that generates a high level of repeat business and provide superior returns to our investors. To achieve our objectives, we strive to offer high quality Asian cuisine in a memorable atmosphere while delivering exceptional customer service and an excellent dining value.
 
We are currently operating restaurants exclusively in the Asian niche due in part to the continued popularity of Asian cuisine, combined with a relatively lower level of organized competition in this segment compared to other popular cuisines segments such as Mexican and Italian. We believe this creates a significant long-term opportunity for us to both grow our existing restaurant sales and open new locations in new and existing markets. We are selective when choosing our new restaurant locations and assess anticipated returns on invested capital at both an


21


Table of Contents

individual restaurant and market level when determining future development plans. We seek an average unit-level return on invested capital of 30 percent for both of our concepts and plan to continue opening new restaurants to the extent that we continue to achieve our target rate of return.
 
Our challenges
 
Our business is highly sensitive to changes in guest traffic. Increases in guest traffic drive higher sales, which improve the leverage of our fixed operating costs and thus enable us to achieve higher operating margins. As guest traffic decreases, as it has during the past few years, lower sales result in decreased leverage that can lead to deteriorations in our operating margins. To help offset the negative impacts of decreased leverage in a declining sales environment, our Bistro and Pei Wei operators have undertaken a series of initiatives designed to gain efficiencies at the restaurant level, with a focus on labor and cost of sales improvement opportunities, while taking special care to ensure that these initiatives do not negatively impact our guests’ dining experience. These initiatives included a focus on improved cross-training, food preparation and scheduling, which created significant improvement in back of the house labor efficiencies.
 
The restaurant industry can be significantly affected by changes in discretionary spending patterns, economic conditions, consumer tastes, lifestyle trends and cost fluctuations. In recent years, consumers have been under increased economic pressures and as a result, many have changed their discretionary spending patterns. Many consumers dine out less frequently than in the past or have reduced the amount they spend on meals while dining out. Accordingly, we strive to continuously evolve and refine the critical elements of our restaurant concepts to help maintain and enhance the strength of our brands and remain fresh and relevant to our guests while maintaining a high value-to-price perception. We continuously update our menu offerings and have injected our restaurants with an updated contemporary look and feel. We also continue to implement a number of new marketing initiatives designed to increase brand awareness and help drive guest traffic.
 
The restaurant business is intensely competitive with respect to food quality, price-value relationships, ambiance, service and location, and many existing restaurants compete with us at each of our locations. Additionally, the continued popularity of Asian cuisine may result in increased competition from new Asian-branded concepts as well as non-Asian restaurants and other food outlets, such as supermarkets, that may increase their Asian-inspired menu offerings.
 
Our business is also influenced by the level of corporate travel and entertainment spending by businesses as a significant portion of our sales is generated by guests conducting business at our restaurants. During fiscal 2009, there was a considerable reduction in business travel and corporate spending in general, which negatively impacted our fiscal 2009 revenues and is expected to continue to have a significant effect on our results until such time as corporate spending increases.
 
Our 2009 Financial Results
 
During 2009, we experienced continued deterioration in guest traffic at our Bistro restaurants, while we saw improvement in guest traffic at our Pei Wei restaurants. We achieved higher operating margins at both concepts due to labor and operational efficiencies, which contributed to higher income in fiscal 2009.
 
Our 2009 financial results include:
 
  •  Consolidated revenue growth of 2.5 percent to $1.2 billion, driven primarily by new restaurant openings and the benefit of an extra week in fiscal 2009, partially offset by a decline in sales at Bistro restaurants open longer than 18 months;
 
  •  An increase in income from continuing operations of 24.7 percent to $43.7 million primarily due to operational efficiencies in cost of sales and labor and lower preopening costs;
 
  •  An increase in diluted income per share from continuing operations attributable to PFCB of 29.0 percent to $1.87 due to a 24.7 percent increase in income from continuing operations combined with the benefit of lower diluted shares outstanding principally resulting from share repurchases;
 
  •  Eight new Bistro openings and seven new Pei Wei openings.


22


Table of Contents

 
2010 Outlook
 
We anticipate fiscal 2010 consolidated revenues will be flat compared to fiscal 2009. This is based on our expectation of slightly lower average weekly sales at both concepts during fiscal 2010 and the impact of a 52-week fiscal year in fiscal 2010 (versus 53 weeks in fiscal 2009), offset by the benefit of a full year of revenues for restaurants that opened during fiscal 2009 combined with revenues from six to ten anticipated new restaurant openings during fiscal 2010.
 
Despite the impact of slightly lower anticipated average weekly sales, we expect restaurant operating margins for fiscal 2010 to be consistent with fiscal 2009, primarily due to our expectation of favorable cost of sales offsetting the anticipated impact of deleverage of certain fixed operating costs and higher planned marketing spend.
 
We expect to open three to five new Bistro restaurants and three to five new Pei Wei restaurants during fiscal 2010. As a result, we anticipate slightly lower preopening expenses for fiscal 2010. Additionally, we expect to decrease interest expense and reduce diluted shares outstanding as a result of our planned paydown of outstanding credit line borrowings and additional repurchases of our common shares during fiscal 2010.
 
We also plan to fully repay our outstanding credit line borrowings of $40.0 million and repurchase approximately $40.0 million in common shares under our current $100.0 million share repurchase authorization during fiscal 2010.
 
Overall, we expect consolidated diluted earnings per share from continuing operations to approximate $2.00 for fiscal 2010.
 
2010 Development
 
Bistro
 
We intend to open three to five new Bistro restaurants in 2010, primarily located in existing markets. Our Bistro restaurants typically range in size from 6,000 to 7,500 square feet, and require an average total cash investment of approximately $2.5 million to $3.0 million (net of estimated tenant incentives) and total invested capital of approximately $3.5 million to $4.0 million per restaurant (net of estimated tenant incentives). This total capitalized investment includes the capitalized lease value of the property, which can vary greatly depending on the specific trade area. See “Risk Factors — Development and Construction Risks.” Preopening expenses are expected to average approximately $350,000 to $400,000 per restaurant during fiscal 2010.
 
Pei Wei
 
We intend to open three to five new Pei Wei restaurants in new and existing markets. Our Pei Wei restaurants typically range in size from 2,800 to 3,400 square feet and require an average total cash investment of approximately $750,000 to $850,000 (net of estimated tenant incentives) and total invested capital of approximately $1.5 million per restaurant (net of estimated tenant incentives). Preopening expenses are expected to average approximately $140,000 to $160,000 per restaurant during fiscal 2010.
 
Operating Statistics
 
There are several key financial metrics that can be useful in evaluating and understanding our business. These metrics, which are widely used throughout the restaurant industry, include short-term revenue measures such as average weekly sales and total revenues and long-term profitability measures such as return on invested capital, each of which are described in further detail below. We believe it is helpful to review these measures both in total and by class year (i.e., year of restaurant opening).
 
  •  Average weekly sales represents an average sales amount per restaurant and helps gauge the changes in traffic, pricing and brand development. New restaurants are included in our average weekly sales comparison at the start of their thirteenth month of operation. It is not uncommon in the casual dining industry for new restaurant locations to open with an initial honeymoon period of higher than normal sales volumes and then experience a drop-off in sales after initial customer trials.


23


Table of Contents

 
  •  Total revenues by class year helps assess the sales performance of our new and existing restaurants as well as the growth of each concept as we continue our expansion strategy.
 
  •  Return on invested capital is a key profitability measure that provides an indication of the long-term health of our concepts. This metric is based on a comparison of operating profit to the average capital invested in our restaurants. We believe return on invested capital is a critical indicator in evaluating our ability to create long-term value for our shareholders.
 
The following table shows total revenues and average weekly sales for our company-owned Bistro and Pei Wei restaurants based on the year of opening (revenues in thousands):
 
                                                         
          Revenues     Average Weekly Sales  
Year of Unit Opening
  Units     2009     2008     2007     2009     2008     2007  
 
Bistro
                                                       
Pre-2002
    64       350,057       365,577       379,013       103,201       110,213       113,886  
2002
    14       66,106       68,872       69,390       89,092       94,603       95,316  
2003
    18       91,914       95,740       98,101       96,346       102,287       104,809  
2004
    18       75,539       78,853       81,263       79,181       84,245       86,817  
2005
    18       76,653       79,875       83,259       80,349       85,337       88,953  
2006
    20       87,267       90,702       96,792       82,327       87,214       93,069  
2007
    20       91,726       98,756       41,687       86,534       94,958       108,279  
2008
    17       72,868       41,369             80,875       94,019        
2009
    8       13,152                   98,887              
Total Bistro
    197     $ 925,282     $ 919,744     $ 849,505     $ 91,161     $ 98,127     $ 102,486  
Pei Wei(1)
                                                       
Pre-2002
    5       10,479       10,529       11,209       39,543       40,497       43,111  
2002
    11       21,460       21,475       23,168       36,810       37,543       40,503  
2003
    17       34,342       33,982       36,021       38,115       38,440       40,748  
2004
    19       39,583       39,357       40,525       39,307       39,836       41,017  
2005
    23       43,761       42,598       43,458       35,899       35,618       36,337  
2006
    27       51,555       49,197       50,383       36,028       35,041       35,885  
2007
    32       54,179       52,792       29,673       31,945       31,726       34,909  
2008
    25       40,841       28,231             30,824       34,053        
2009
    7       6,479                   36,198              
Total Pei Wei
    166     $ 302,679     $ 278,161     $ 234,437     $ 35,171     $ 35,675     $ 38,095  
 
 
(1) Reflects revenues and average weekly sales for Pei Wei continuing operations only.
 
Return on invested capital metrics are available on our website at www.pfcb.com.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements. The following discussion addresses our most critical accounting policies, which are those that require significant judgment.
 
Share-Based Compensation
 
We account for share-based compensation based on fair value measurement guidance. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the input of subjective assumptions, for our options and cash-settled liability awards, with the exception of performance units. These assumptions include estimating 1) expected term, 2) common stock price volatility over the expected term and 3) the number of awards that will ultimately not vest (“forfeitures”). For performance units, a Monte Carlo simulation model is used to calculate fair value. The Monte Carlo simulation model incorporates the historical performance, volatility and correlation of our stock price and the Russell 2000 Index. Additionally, we use assumptions to estimate the expected forfeiture rate related to restricted stock in determining the share-based compensation for these awards. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect fair value and our estimates of share-based compensation and consequently, the related amount recognized in the consolidated statements of income.


24


Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 
We review property and equipment and intangible assets with finite lives (those assets resulting from the acquisition of noncontrolling interests in the operating rights of certain of our restaurants) for impairment when events or circumstances indicate these assets might be impaired, but at least quarterly. An analysis is performed at the individual restaurant level and primarily includes an assessment of historical cash flows and other relevant facts and circumstances. For restaurants open greater than two years, negative restaurant-level cash flows over the previous twelve-month period is considered a potential impairment indicator. In these situations, we evaluate future restaurant cash flow projections in conjunction with qualitative factors and future operating plans. Based on this assessment, we either (a) continue to monitor these restaurants over the near-term for evidence of improved performance or (b) immediately recognize an impairment charge based on the amount by which the asset carrying value exceeds fair value, which is based on undiscounted future cash flows.
 
In the past, restaurants under monitoring have typically achieved cash flow improvements in a timely fashion such that no impairment charge was deemed necessary and the restaurant was removed from active monitoring. However, an impairment charge was recognized during fiscal 2008 based on our decision to close ten underperforming Pei Wei restaurants, including several locations that were previously being monitored for impairment. We did not recognize any impairment charges during fiscal 2009.
 
Our impairment assessment process requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows and operating outcomes, which are subject to a significant degree of judgment based on our experience and knowledge. These estimates can be significantly impacted by changes in the economic environment, real estate market conditions and overall operating performance. At any given time, we are actively monitoring a small number of restaurants and impairment charges could be triggered in the future if individual restaurant performance does not improve or if management decides to close that location. Also, if current economic conditions worsen, additional restaurants could be placed on active monitoring and potentially trigger impairment charges in future periods.
 
Income Taxes
 
We provide for income taxes based on our estimate of federal and state income tax liabilities. These estimates include, among other items, effective rates for state and local income taxes, allowable tax credits for items such as taxes paid on reported tip income, estimates related to depreciation and amortization expense allowable for tax purposes, and the tax deductibility of certain other items.
 
Our estimates are based on the information available to us at the time that we prepare the income tax provision. We generally file our annual income tax returns several months after our fiscal year-end. Income tax returns are subject to audit by federal, state, and local governments, generally years after the returns are filed. These returns could be subject to material adjustments or differing interpretations of the tax laws.
 
On a quarterly basis, we review and update our inventory of tax positions as necessary to add any new uncertain positions taken, or to remove previously identified uncertain positions that have been adequately resolved. Additionally, uncertain positions may be re-measured as warranted by changes in facts or law. Accounting for uncertain tax positions requires significant judgments, including estimating the amount, timing and likelihood of ultimate settlement. Although we believe that these estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from these estimates.
 
Lease Obligations
 
We lease all of our restaurant properties. At the inception of the lease, each property is evaluated to determine whether the lease will be accounted for as an operating or capital lease. The term of the lease used for this evaluation includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal option can be reasonably assured and failure to exercise such option would result in an economic penalty.
 
There is potential for variability in the rent holiday period, which begins on the possession date and ends on the store open date, during which no cash rent payments are typically due under the terms of the lease. Factors that may affect the length of the rent holiday period generally relate to construction related delays. Extension of the rent holiday period due to delays in store opening will result in greater preopening rent expense recognized during the rent holiday period and lower occupancy expense during the rest of the lease term (post-opening).


25


Table of Contents

For leases that contain rent escalations, we record the total rent payable during the lease term, as determined above, on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease (including the rent holiday period beginning upon our possession of the premises), and record the difference between the minimum rent paid and the straight-line rent as a lease obligation. Many of our leases contain provisions that require additional rental payments based upon restaurant sales volume (“contingent rent”). Contingent rent is accrued each period as the liability is incurred, in addition to the straight-line rent expense noted above. This results in variability in occupancy expense as a percentage of revenues over the term of the lease in restaurants where we pay contingent rent.
 
Management makes judgments regarding the probable term for each restaurant property lease, which can impact the classification and accounting for a lease as capital or operating, the rent holiday and/or escalations in payments that are taken into consideration when calculating straight-line rent and the term over which tenant incentives received from landlords in connection with certain operating leases for each restaurant are amortized. These judgments may produce materially different amounts of depreciation, amortization and rent expense than would be reported if different assumed lease terms were used.
 
Self Insurance
 
We are self-insured for a significant portion of our current and prior years’ exposures related to our workers’ compensation, general liability, medical and dental programs. We have paid to our insurance carrier amounts that approximate the cost of claims known to date and we have accrued additional liabilities for our estimate of ultimate costs related to those claims. We develop these estimates using historical experience factors to estimate the ultimate claim exposure. Our self-insurance liabilities are actuarially determined and consider estimates of expected losses, based on statistical analyses of our actual historical trends as well as historical industry data. If actual claims experience differs from our assumptions and estimates, changes in our insurance reserves would impact the expense recorded in our consolidated income statements.
 
Partnership Structure
 
We utilize a partnership philosophy to facilitate the development, leadership and operation of our restaurants. Historically, this philosophy was embodied in a traditional legal partnership structure, which included capital contributions from our partners in exchange for an ownership stake in the profits and losses of our restaurants. Under this legal partnership program, each partner who wished to participate in our legal partnership structure, to the extent applicable, was required to make a cash capital contribution in exchange for a specified interest in the partnership. The ownership interest purchased by each partner generally ranged between two and ten percent of the restaurant or region the partner oversees. Generally, no more than ten percent of an individual restaurant was owned in total by noncontrolling partners. We performed an assessment of what the imputed fair value of these interests might be for a passive equity investor (i.e. not someone actually working in the restaurant), utilizing a discounted cash flow model and updated assumptions based on the results of an annual valuation analysis. This methodology involved the use of various estimates relating to future cash flow projections and discount rates for which significant judgments were required. We recognized any excess of the imputed fair value of these interests, determined by using the discounted cash flow model, over the cash contribution paid by our partners as partner investment expense upon purchase by the partner of the respective interest.
 
At the end of a specific term (generally five years), we have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the noncontrolling interest in the partner’s respective restaurant or region at fair value. The estimated fair value of the noncontrolling interest is determined by reference to current industry purchase metrics as well as the historical cash flows or net income of the subject restaurant or region. We have the option to pay the agreed upon purchase price in cash over a period of time not to exceed five years. Given that there is no public market for these interests, the fair value determinations are subjective and require the use of various estimates for which significant judgments are required. Prior to fiscal year 2009, any excess of the purchase price over the imputed fair value was recorded as an intangible asset and amortized over approximately 15 years for our Bistro restaurants and approximately 10 years for our Pei Wei restaurants. Beginning in fiscal year 2009 upon the adoption of new accounting guidance, an intangible asset is no longer recognized upon buyout of noncontrolling interests. Instead, any excess of the purchase price over the imputed fair value is recognized as a reduction to additional-paid-in-capital in equity. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion.


26


Table of Contents

Effective January 2007 for new store openings, the Bistro began employing a different partnership structure to achieve the same goal. At the restaurant level, our Operating and Culinary Partners at stores opened on or after January 1, 2007 (still “partners” in the philosophical, but not legal sense) no longer have a direct ownership stake in the profits and losses of a restaurant, but are instead eligible to receive monthly incentive payments based upon the profitability of the restaurant, as well as to participate in an incentive program that rewards improvements in the operating performance of the restaurant. As a result of these changes, incentive payments made to the individuals participating in the new plan are classified as compensation expense rather than as net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Accordingly, compensation expense for these Operating and Culinary Partners is reflected in the consolidated income statement as labor expense. Additionally, a similar structure exists for our Market Partners, Market Chefs and Regional Vice Presidents, with related compensation expense reflected as general and administrative expense in the consolidated income statement. As a result of this change, since the beginning of 2007, we have no longer recognized partner investment expense for new Bistro restaurant openings. Additionally, many existing legal partners requested an early buyout of their partnership interests during 2007 and 2008 as a result of their desire to participate in the new plan, the financial impact of which is discussed under “Partner Investment Expense” in Results of Operations.
 
The Pei Wei partnership structure was not affected by the changes at the Bistro and the traditional partnership structure remains in effect for new Pei Wei restaurant openings.
 
Results of Operations
 
We operate on a 52/53-week year, with the fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to December 31. Fiscal year 2009 was comprised of 53 weeks and fiscal years 2008 and 2007 were each comprised of 52 weeks.
 
Fiscal 2009 compared to Fiscal 2008
 
Our consolidated operating results for the fiscal years ended January 3, 2010 (fiscal 2009) and December 28, 2008 (fiscal 2008) were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Fiscal Year  
    2009     % of Revenues     2008     % of Revenues     Change     % Change  
 
Revenues
  $ 1,228,179       100.0 %   $ 1,198,124       100.0 %   $ 30,055       2.5 %
Costs and expenses:
                                               
Cost of sales
    326,421       26.6 %     325,630       27.2 %     791       0.2 %
Labor
    401,583       32.7 %     396,911       33.1 %     4,672       1.2 %
Operating
    203,859       16.6 %     198,967       16.6 %     4,892       2.5 %
Occupancy
    70,635       5.8 %     69,809       5.8 %     826       1.2 %
General and administrative
    82,749       6.7 %     77,488       6.5 %     5,261       6.8 %
Depreciation and amortization
    74,429       6.1 %     68,711       5.7 %     5,718       8.3 %
Preopening expense
    3,919       0.3 %     8,457       0.7 %     (4,538 )     (53.7 )%
Partner investment expense
    (629 )     (0.1 )%     (354 )     0.0 %     (275 )     77.7 %
                                                 
Total costs and expenses
    1,162,966       94.7 %     1,145,619       95.6 %     17,347       1.5 %
                                                 
Income from operations
    65,213       5.3 %     52,505       4.4 %     12,708       24.2 %
Interest and other income (expense), net
    (1,637 )     (0.1 )%     (3,362 )     (0.3 )%     1,725       (51.3 )%
                                                 
Income from continuing operations before taxes
    63,576       5.2 %     49,143       4.1 %     14,433       29.4 %
Provision for income taxes
    (18,492 )     (1.5 )%     (12,193 )     (1.0 )%     (6,299 )     51.7 %
                                                 
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
    45,084       3.7 %     36,950       3.1 %     8,134       22.0 %
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (479 )     0.0 %     (7,591 )     (0.6 )%     7,112       (93.7 )%
                                                 
Net income
    44,605       3.6 %     29,359       2.5 %     15,246       51.9 %
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    1,408       0.1 %     1,933       0.2 %     (525 )     (27.2 )%
                                                 
Net income attributable to PFCB
  $ 43,197       3.5 %   $ 27,426       2.3 %   $ 15,771       57.5 %
                                                 


27


Table of Contents

Certain percentage amounts may not sum due to rounding.
 
Selected operating statistics for the Bistro were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Fiscal Year  
          % of
          % of
             
    2009     Revenues     2008     Revenues     Change     % Change  
 
Revenues
  $ 925,321       100.0 %   $ 919,963       100.0 %   $ 5,358       0.6 %
Costs and expenses:
                                               
Cost of sales
    244,816       26.5 %     249,911       27.2 %     (5,095 )     (2.0 )%
Labor
    300,775       32.5 %     301,967       32.8 %     (1,192 )     (0.4 )%
Operating
    150,883       16.3 %     149,083       16.2 %     1,800       1.2 %
Occupancy
    50,186       5.4 %     50,670       5.5 %     (484 )     (1.0 )%
Depreciation and amortization
    54,521       5.9 %     51,091       5.6 %     3,430       6.7 %
Preopening expense
    2,835       0.3 %     5,677       0.6 %     (2,842 )     (50.1 )%
Partner investment expense
    (236 )     0.0 %     (1,066 )     (0.1 )%     830       (77.9 )%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    538       0.1 %     1,361       0.1 %     (823 )     (60.5 )%
 
Selected operating statistics for Pei Wei were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Fiscal Year  
          % of
          % of
             
    2009     Revenues     2008     Revenues     Change     % Change  
 
Revenues
  $ 302,724       100.0 %   $ 278,161       100.0 %   $ 24,563       8.8 %
Costs and expenses:
                                               
Cost of sales
    81,605       27.0 %     75,719       27.2 %     5,886       7.8 %
Labor
    100,808       33.3 %     94,944       34.1 %     5,864       6.2 %
Operating
    52,976       17.5 %     49,884       17.9 %     3,092       6.2 %
Occupancy
    20,449       6.8 %     19,139       6.9 %     1,310       6.8 %
Depreciation and amortization
    18,103       6.0 %     16,158       5.8 %     1,945       12.0 %
Preopening expense
    1,084       0.4 %     2,780       1.0 %     (1,696 )     (61.0 )%
Partner investment expense
    (393 )     (0.1 )%     712       0.3 %     (1,105 )      
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    870       0.3 %     572       0.2 %     298       52.1 %
 
Percentages over 100% are not displayed.
 
Revenues
 
Our revenues are derived primarily from food and beverage sales. Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  The increase in revenues was attributable to incremental new store revenues of $44.7 million, comprised of a full year of revenues from the 17 new stores that opened during 2008 and revenues generated by the eight new Bistro restaurants that opened during 2009. The increase was partially offset by a $39.1 million decline in revenues for stores that opened prior to 2008, due to a significant reduction in overall guest traffic combined with a slight decline in the average check. Fiscal year 2009 also includes the benefit from one extra week of revenues compared to fiscal year 2008.
 
Pei Wei:  The increase in revenues was attributable to incremental new store revenues of $19.1 million, comprised of a full year of revenues from the 25 new stores that opened during 2008 and revenues generated by the seven new Pei Wei restaurants that opened during 2009. The remainder of the increase was due to a $5.4 million increase in revenues for stores that opened prior to 2008, as well as a slight increase in overall guest traffic partially offset by a slight decline in the average check. Fiscal year 2009 also includes the benefit from one extra week of revenues compared to fiscal year 2008.


28


Table of Contents

Costs and Expenses
 
Cost of Sales
 
Cost of sales is comprised of the cost of food and beverages. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues decreased at both Bistro and Pei Wei due to the net impact of favorable product mix shifts, operational efficiencies, and favorable produce pricing. These declines were partially offset by higher wok oil costs. We negotiate annual pricing agreements for many of our key commodities and such contracts provided for favorable produce costs, consistent beef and seafood costs, and unfavorable poultry costs for fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008.
 
Labor
 
Labor expenses consist of restaurant management salaries, hourly staff payroll costs, other payroll-related items and imputed partner bonus expense. Imputed partner bonus expense represents the portion of restaurant level operating results that is allocable to certain noncontrolling partners, but is presented as bonus expense for accounting purposes. Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased primarily due to improved labor efficiencies in culinary and hospitality positions and, to a lesser extent, the benefit of reduced workers’ compensation insurance liabilities resulting from lower than anticipated claim development. These declines were partially offset by the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion of labor expenses that is fixed in nature and, to a lesser extent, higher management incentive and health insurance costs.
 
Pei Wei:  Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased primarily due to improved labor efficiencies in culinary and hospitality positions, lower manager salaries resulting from reduced management headcount, and the benefit of reduced workers’ compensation insurance liabilities resulting from lower than anticipated claim development. These declines were partially offset by higher expenses associated with the utilization of additional key hourly employees as well as the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion of labor expenses that is fixed in nature and, to a lesser extent, higher management incentive accruals.
 
Operating
 
Operating expenses consist primarily of various restaurant-level costs such as repairs and maintenance, utilities and marketing, certain of which are variable and may fluctuate with revenues. Our experience to date has been that operating costs during the first four to nine months of a newly opened restaurant are materially greater than what can be expected after that time, both in aggregate dollars and as a percentage of revenues. Also, expenditures associated with marketing expenses are discretionary in nature and the timing and amount of marketing spend will vary. Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased primarily due to the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion of operating costs that is fixed in nature, higher repairs and maintenance expense and higher menu printing costs. These increases were partially offset by lower utilities costs resulting from favorable rates and lower usage.
 
Pei Wei:  Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased primarily due to lower utilities costs resulting from favorable rates, lower menu printing costs and the impact of increased leverage resulting from an extra week of revenues in fiscal 2009 on the portion of operating costs that is fixed in nature. These decreases were partially offset by higher repairs and maintenance costs and, to a lesser extent, increased marketing spend.
 
Occupancy
 
Occupancy costs include both fixed and variable portions of rent, common area maintenance charges, property and general liability insurance and property taxes. Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues decreased from prior year primarily due to lower contingent rent expense resulting from lower sales, the impact of increased leverage resulting from an extra


29


Table of Contents

week of revenues in fiscal 2009 and, to a lesser extent, decreased general liability insurance. These decreases were partially offset by the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales.
 
Pei Wei:  Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues decreased from prior year primarily due to the impact of increased leverage resulting from an extra week of revenues in fiscal 2009 and lower property tax expense partially offset by the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales.
 
General and Administrative
 
General and administrative expenses are comprised of costs associated with corporate and administrative functions that support restaurant development and operations and provide infrastructure to support future growth including, but not limited to, management and staff compensation, employee benefits, travel, legal and professional fees, technology and market research.
 
Consolidated general and administrative costs increased primarily due to higher management incentive accruals, higher share-based compensation expense, principally resulting from the performance unit award grants issued to our co-CEOs during the first quarter of 2009 and the cash-settled liability awards issued during fiscal 2009, as well as additional compensation expense resulting from unrealized holding gains associated with investments in the 401(k) Restoration Plan. These increases were partially offset by lower management salaries due to decreased headcount and a reduction in other administrative support costs. Fiscal 2008 also includes $2.0 million of cash and non-cash charges related to a separation agreement with the former Pei Wei president which included a severance payment, accelerated vesting of unvested options and the extension of the expiration date of all outstanding stock options.
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
Depreciation and amortization expenses include the depreciation of fixed assets, gains and losses on disposal of assets and the amortization of intangible assets, software and non-transferable liquor license fees.
 
Depreciation and amortization increased at both Bistro and Pei Wei primarily due to additional depreciation on restaurants that opened during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased at both Bistro and Pei Wei primarily due to the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales, partially offset by the impact of increased leverage resulting from an extra week of revenues in fiscal 2009.
 
Preopening Expense
 
Preopening expenses, which are expensed as incurred, consist of expenses incurred prior to opening a new restaurant and are comprised principally of manager salaries, employee payroll and related training costs. Preopening expenses also include straight-line rent expense for the period between the possession date of leased premises and the restaurant opening date. Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Preopening expense decreased primarily due to the impact of opening eight new restaurants during fiscal 2009 compared to opening 17 new restaurants during fiscal 2008.
 
Pei Wei:  Preopening expense decreased primarily due to the impact of opening seven new restaurants during fiscal 2009 compared to opening 25 new restaurants during fiscal 2008.
 
Partner Investment Expense
 
Partner investment expense represents the difference between the imputed fair value of noncontrolling interests at the time our partners invested in our restaurants and our partners’ cash contributions for those ownership interests. Additionally, for those interests that are bought out prior to the restaurant reaching maturity (typically after five years of operation), partner investment expense includes a reversal of previously recognized expense for


30


Table of Contents

the difference between the fair value of the noncontrolling interest at inception date and the fair value at the date of repurchase, to the extent that the former is greater. Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  All partner investment expense activity for the Bistro is related to early buyouts of noncontrolling interests. The change in partner investment expense resulted from fewer early buyouts of noncontrolling interests during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008.
 
Pei Wei:  Partner investment expense decreased primarily due to the impact of opening fewer new restaurants during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008.
 
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
 
Interest expense primarily consists of interest costs in excess of amounts capitalized related to our outstanding credit line and other borrowings, as well as accretion expense related to our conditional asset retirement obligations. Interest income earned primarily relates to interest-bearing overnight deposits. Realized and unrealized holding gains (losses) related to investments in the 401(k) Restoration Plan are included within other income (expense), with a corresponding offset in general and administrative expense.
 
The change in consolidated interest and other income (expense), net was primarily due to lower interest expense resulting from the repayment of $40.0 million of our outstanding credit line borrowings in fiscal 2009. Additionally, unrealized holding gains during the current year compared to unrealized holding losses in the prior year associated with investments in the 401(k) Restoration Plan, lower capitalized interest and lower interest income contributed to the change. We expect to continue to recognize net interest expense until such time as we further lower our outstanding debt levels or increase our development.
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
Our effective tax rate from continuing operations, including discrete items and deduction for noncontrolling interests, was 29.7% for fiscal 2009 compared to 25.8% for fiscal 2008. Prior fiscal year includes the impact of a change in estimate related to amended tax returns. Additionally, fiscal year 2009 state tax expense increased from fiscal year 2008. This is due to an increase in state tax filings, impacts of state tax reform measures and changes in filing methodology as a result of audits. The income tax rate for both fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008 differed from the expected provision for income taxes, which is derived by applying the statutory income tax rate, primarily as a result of FICA tip credits. In fiscal year 2009, income from continuing operations increased at a greater rate than FICA tip credits generated as compared to fiscal year 2008. Because there are no tipped employees at Pei Wei, as Pei Wei contributes more net income, and if Bistro’s income from operations grows at a rate greater than revenue growth, the impact of Bistro’s tip credit on the company’s effective tax rate will continue to decrease.
 
Management has evaluated all positive and negative evidence concerning the realizability of deferred tax assets and has determined that, with the exception of a small amount of state net operating losses, we will recognize sufficient future taxable income to realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets.
 
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
 
The results of Taneko and 10 closed Pei Wei restaurants are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. During fiscal 2009, we recognized pretax charges of $1.4 million related to estimated and actual lease termination costs. See Fiscal 2008 compared to Fiscal 2007 Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax section for further discussion.
 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the portion of our net income which is attributable to the collective ownership interests of our noncontrolling partners. In certain of our restaurants, we employ a partnership management structure whereby we have entered into a series of partnership agreements


31


Table of Contents

with our regional managers, certain of our general managers, and certain of our executive chefs. Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  The change in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was primarily due to the full year impact of noncontrolling interest buyouts that occurred during fiscal 2008 and, to a lesser, extent, the impact of noncontrolling interest buyouts occurring during fiscal 2009. These buyouts reduced the number of noncontrolling interests from 133 at the beginning of fiscal 2008 to 20 as of January 3, 2010.
 
Pei Wei:  Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a percentage of revenues increased from the prior year primarily due to the impact of higher restaurant net income and, to a lesser extent, a cumulative adjustment of prior period expense, partially offset by the impact of 132 noncontrolling interest buyouts occurring since the beginning of fiscal 2008.
 
Fiscal 2008 compared to Fiscal 2007
 
Our consolidated operating results for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2008 (fiscal 2008) and December 30, 2007 (fiscal 2007) were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Fiscal Year  
          % of
          % of
             
    2008     Revenues     2007     Revenues     Change     % Change  
 
Revenues
  $ 1,198,124       100.0 %   $ 1,084,193       100.0 %   $ 113,931       10.5 %
Costs and expenses:
                                               
Cost of sales
    325,630       27.2 %     297,242       27.4 %     28,388       9.6 %
Labor
    396,911       33.1 %     364,074       33.6 %     32,837       9.0 %
Operating
    198,967       16.6 %     172,147       15.9 %     26,820       15.6 %
Occupancy
    69,809       5.8 %     62,164       5.7 %     7,645       12.3 %
General and administrative
    77,488       6.5 %     66,968       6.2 %     10,520       15.7 %
Depreciation and amortization
    68,711       5.7 %     55,988       5.2 %     12,723       22.7 %
Preopening expense
    8,457       0.7 %     14,310       1.3 %     (5,853 )     (40.9 )%
Partner investment expense
    (354 )     0.0 %     (2,012 )     (0.2 )%     1,658       (82.4 )%
                                                 
Total costs and expenses
    1,145,619       95.6 %     1,030,881       95.1 %     114,738       11.1 %
                                                 
Income from operations
    52,505       4.4 %     53,312       4.9 %     (807 )     (1.5 )%
Interest and other income (expense), net
    (3,362 )     (0.3 )%     (100 )     0.0 %     (3,262 )      
                                                 
Income from continuing operations before taxes
    49,143       4.1 %     53,212       4.9 %     (4,069 )     (7.6 )%
Provision for income taxes
    (12,193 )     (1.0 )%     (12,420 )     (1.1 )%     227       (1.8 )%
                                                 
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
    36,950       3.1 %     40,792       3.8 %     (3,842 )     (9.4 )%
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (7,591 )     (0.6 )%     (4,560 )     (0.4 )%     (3,031 )     66.5 %
                                                 
Net income
    29,359       2.5 %     36,232       3.3 %     (6,873 )     (19.0 )%
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    1,933       0.2 %     4,169       0.4 %     (2,236 )     (53.6 )%
                                                 
Net income attributable to PFCB
  $ 27,426       2.3 %   $ 32,063       3.0 %   $ (4,637 )     (14.5 )%
                                                 
 
Certain percentage amounts do not sum to total due to rounding. Percentages over 100% not displayed.


32


Table of Contents

Selected operating statistics for the Bistro were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Fiscal Year  
          % of
          % of
             
    2008     Revenues     2007     Revenues     Change     % Change  
 
Revenues
  $ 919,963       100.0 %   $ 849,743       100.0 %   $ 70,220       8.3 %
Costs and expenses:
                                               
Cost of sales
    249,911       27.2 %     232,578       27.4 %     17,333       7.5 %
Labor
    301,967       32.8 %     282,919       33.3 %     19,048       6.7 %
Operating
    149,083       16.2 %     131,863       15.5 %     17,220       13.1 %
Occupancy
    50,670       5.5 %     47,059       5.5 %     3,611       7.7 %
Depreciation and amortization
    51,091       5.6 %     42,294       5.0 %     8,797       20.8 %
Preopening expense
    5,677       0.6 %     9,012       1.1 %     (3,335 )     (37.0 )%
Partner investment expense
    (1,066 )     (0.1 )%     (3,358 )     (0.4 )%     2,292       (68.3 )%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    1,361       0.1 %     3,351       0.4 %     (1,990 )     (59.4 )%
 
Selected operating statistics for Pei Wei were as follows (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Fiscal Year  
          % of
          % of
             
    2008     Revenues     2007     Revenues     Change     % Change  
 
Revenues
  $ 278,161       100.0 %   $ 234,450       100.0 %   $ 43,711       18.6 %
Costs and expenses:
                                               
Cost of sales
    75,719       27.2 %     64,664       27.6 %     11,055       17.1 %
Labor
    94,944       34.1 %     81,155       34.6 %     13,789       17.0 %
Operating
    49,884       17.9 %     40,284       17.2 %     9,600       23.8 %
Occupancy
    19,139       6.9 %     15,105       6.4 %     4,034       26.7 %
Depreciation and amortization
    16,158       5.8 %     12,278       5.2 %     3,880       31.6 %
Preopening expense
    2,780       1.0 %     5,298       2.3 %     (2,518 )     (47.5 )%
Partner investment expense
    712       0.3 %     1,346       0.6 %     (634 )     (47.1 )%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    572       0.2 %     818       0.3 %     (246 )     (30.1 )%
 
Revenues
 
Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $98.4 million generated by 17 new Bistro restaurants that opened during 2008 combined with a full year of revenues for the 20 new stores that opened during 2007. Revenues for stores that opened prior to 2007 declined by $28.2 million as a significant reduction in overall guest traffic more than offset the benefit of a three to four percent average check increase, reflecting the net benefit of price and menu mix changes.
 
Pei Wei:  The increase in revenues was attributable to revenues of $51.3 million generated by 25 new Pei Wei restaurants that opened during 2008 combined with a full year of revenues for the 32 new stores that opened during 2007. Revenues for stores that opened prior to 2007 decreased by $7.6 million primarily due to a significant reduction in overall guest traffic partially offset by the benefit of a slightly higher average check, reflecting the net benefit of price and menu mix changes.


33


Table of Contents

Costs and Expenses
 
Cost of Sales
 
Cost of sales as a percentage of revenues decreased at both Bistro and Pei Wei due to the net impact of favorable product mix shifts. We negotiate annual pricing agreements for many of our key commodities and such contracts provided for favorable seafood and produce costs, unfavorable poultry and wok oil costs, and consistent beef costs during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007.
 
Labor
 
Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased primarily due to improved efficiency primarily in culinary as well as hospitality positions. The decrease was partially offset by the benefit of reduced workers’ compensation insurance liabilities recorded in 2007 resulting from lower than anticipated claim development from prior claim years, higher management incentive costs principally resulting from the full year impact of the 2007 change in the Bistro partnership structure and the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion of labor expenses that is fixed in nature.
 
Pei Wei:  Labor expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased primarily due to improved labor efficiency in culinary and hospitality positions as well as lower manager salaries resulting from reduced management headcount. The benefit of opening fewer new stores on a larger base of existing stores during fiscal 2008 also contributed to the decrease. The decrease was partially offset by costs associated with the utilization of additional key hourly employees, the benefit of reduced workers’ compensation insurance liabilities recorded in 2007 resulting from lower than anticipated claim development from prior claim years and the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion of labor expenses that is fixed in nature.
 
Operating
 
Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased primarily due to increased marketing spend, the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales on the portion of operating costs that is fixed in nature and higher utility costs.
 
Pei Wei:  Operating expenses as a percentage of revenues increased primarily due to the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales on the portion of operating costs that is fixed in nature as well as increased marketing spend, higher utility costs, and higher menu printing costs related to new menu rollouts.
 
Occupancy
 
Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues remained consistent primarily due to lower contingent rent expense offset by the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales.
 
Pei Wei:  Occupancy costs as a percentage of revenues increased primarily due to the impact of decreased leverage on lower average weekly sales.
 
General and Administrative
 
Consolidated general and administrative costs increased primarily due to higher management incentive accruals resulting from the accrual of a corporate bonus for fiscal 2008 compared to the absence of such an accrual in fiscal 2007 as well as higher compensation and benefits expense primarily related to the addition of corporate management personnel and increased health insurance costs. These increases were


34


Table of Contents

partially offset by lower share-based compensation expense. Fiscal 2008 also includes $2.0 million of cash and non-cash charges related to a separation agreement with the former Pei Wei president which included a severance payment, accelerated vesting of unvested options and the extension of the expiration date of all outstanding stock options.
 
Depreciation and Amortization
 
Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to depreciation on restaurants that opened during fiscal 2008 as well as a full year of depreciation on restaurants that opened during fiscal 2007. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales.
 
Pei Wei:  Depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to depreciation on restaurants that opened during fiscal 2008 as well as a full year of depreciation on restaurants that opened during fiscal 2007. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization increased primarily due to the impact of decreased leverage resulting from lower average weekly sales.
 
Preopening Expense
 
Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Preopening expense decreased primarily due to the impact of opening 17 new restaurants during fiscal 2008 compared to opening 20 new restaurants during fiscal 2007 in addition to a lower number of scheduled new restaurant openings in early fiscal 2009 compared to early fiscal 2008.
 
Pei Wei:  Preopening expense decreased primarily due to the timing of expenses related to restaurants that opened during the first quarter of 2008, which resulted in a greater portion of preopening expenses related to fiscal 2008 openings being recognized during fiscal 2007. Also contributing to the decrease was the impact of opening 25 new restaurants during fiscal 2008 compared to opening 32 new restaurants during fiscal 2007 as well as a lower number of scheduled new restaurant openings in early fiscal 2009 compared to early fiscal 2008.
 
Partner Investment Expense
 
Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  The change in partner investment expense resulted primarily from changes in the partnership structure beginning in 2007 which led to a significant increase in early buyouts of noncontrolling interests beginning in fiscal 2007. Early buyouts resulted in a $1.1 million reversal of previously recognized partner investment expense during fiscal 2008 as compared to a $3.4 million reversal during fiscal 2007, in each case due to the fair value of the noncontrolling interests at inception date exceeding the fair value of the noncontrolling interests at repurchase date.
 
Pei Wei:  Partner investment expense decreased primarily due to the impact of opening fewer new restaurants during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007.
 
Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net
 
Consolidated interest and other income (expense), net increased primarily due to higher interest expense in 2008 resulting from interest incurred on a higher average level of outstanding credit line borrowings throughout 2008, a portion of which exceeded our limit for capitalization during 2008. We expect to continue to recognize net interest expense until such time as we lower our outstanding debt levels or increase our development.


35


Table of Contents

Provision for Income Taxes
 
Our effective tax rate from continuing operations was 25.8% for fiscal 2008 compared to 25.3% for fiscal 2007. The increase from the prior year was primarily attributable to state taxes, and, to a lesser extent, the impact of a change in estimate related to amended tax returns. Besides the effect of state taxes and the change in estimate related to the amended returns, the income tax rate for both fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 differed from the expected provision for income taxes, which is derived by applying the statutory income tax rate, primarily as a result of FICA tip credits.
 
Management has evaluated all positive and negative evidence concerning the realizability of deferred tax assets and has determined that, with the exception of a small amount of state net operating losses, we will recognize sufficient future taxable income to realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets.
 
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
 
As part of ongoing profitability initiatives, we closed 10 underperforming Pei Wei restaurants during the fourth quarter of 2008. This decision, which was reached during the third quarter of 2008, was the result of a rigorous evaluation of our entire store portfolio. We reviewed each location’s past and present operating performance combined with projected future results. The locations selected for closure represent restaurants with lower profitability that were not projected to provide acceptable returns in the foreseeable future.
 
During the second half of 2008, we recognized non-cash asset impairment charges of $7.5 million ($4.6 million net of tax) related to the write-off of the carrying value of long-lived assets associated with the 10 Pei Wei store closures. We also recognized additional pretax charges of $2.6 million related to estimated and actual lease termination costs and $0.1 million related to severance payments made in connection with the store closures. These charges as well as all historical operations related to the closed stores are reflected within discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all years presented as further discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements.
 
Additionally, as a result of the expected sale of Taneko’s long-lived assets, Taneko was classified as a discontinued operation as of December 30, 2007. We recognized a $3.1 million ($2.1 million net of tax) asset impairment charge which was included within discontinued operations during 2007. All revenues, costs and expenses and income taxes attributable to Taneko are reflected within discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 
Each segment contributed as follows:
 
Bistro:  Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a percentage of revenues at the Bistro decreased due to the impact of noncontrolling interest buyouts occurring during fiscal 2008 and the full year impact of noncontrolling interest buyouts that occurred during fiscal 2007. During fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, 92 interests and 203 interests were purchased, respectively, which reduced the number of noncontrolling interests to 40 interests at the end of fiscal 2008.
 
Pei Wei:  Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a percentage of revenues decreased slightly primarily due to the impact of noncontrolling interest buyouts occurring during fiscal 2007 and 2008.


36


Table of Contents

Quarterly Results
 
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly information for the eight fiscal quarters in the two-year period ended January 3, 2010, expressed as a percentage of revenues, except for revenues which are expressed in thousands. This quarterly information has been prepared on a basis consistent with the audited financial statements and, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the information for the periods presented. Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, and operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for a full fiscal year.
 
                                                                 
    Fiscal 2009     Fiscal 2008  
    First
    Second
    Third
    Fourth
    First
    Second
    Third
    Fourth
 
    Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter  
 
Revenues, in thousands
  $ 309,837     $ 301,360     $ 290,329     $ 326,653     $ 305,917     $ 301,533     $ 295,877     $ 294,797  
Costs and expenses:
                                                               
Cost of sales
    26.8 %     26.4 %     26.3 %     26.7 %     27.3 %     27.2 %     27.2 %     27.0 %
Labor
    32.5       32.6       33.0       32.8       33.8       33.2       33.1       32.4  
Operating
    16.4       16.2       17.5       16.4       15.7       16.4       17.6       16.7  
Occupancy
    5.6       5.8       6.1       5.6       5.8       5.8       5.8       5.9  
General and administrative
    6.4       6.8       7.0       6.7       6.1       6.3       6.1       7.4  
Depreciation and amortization
    6.0       6.2       6.6       5.6       5.4       5.7       5.8       6.1  
Preopening expense
    0.2       0.2       0.5       0.4       0.9       0.6       0.5       0.8  
Partner investment expense
    (0.1 )     0.0       0.0       0.0       0.1       (0.2 )     0.0       (0.1 )
                                                                 
Total costs and expenses
    93.7       94.1       97.0       94.2       95.0       95.0       96.3       96.1  
                                                                 
Income from operations
    6.3       5.9       3.0       5.8       5.0       5.0       3.7       3.9  
Interest and other income (expense), net
    (0.3 )     (0.1 )     0.0       (0.1 )     (0.3 )     (0.3 )     (0.3 )     (0.2 )
                                                                 
Income from continuing operations before taxes
    6.0       5.8       3.1       5.7       4.7       4.6       3.4       3.7  
Provision for income taxes
    (1.6 )     (1.7 )     (0.9 )     (1.8 )     (1.2 )     (1.2 )     (0.7 )     (1.0 )
                                                                 
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
    4.4       4.1       2.2       3.8       3.5       3.4       2.7       2.7  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
    0.0       (0.2 )     0.0       0.0       (0.1 )     (0.2 )     (1.6 )     (0.7 )
                                                                 
Net income
    4.4 %     3.9 %     2.2 %     3.9 %     3.4 %     3.3 %     1.1 %     2.0 %
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    0.1       0.1       0.1       0.2       0.2       0.2       0.1       0.1  
                                                                 
Net income attributable to PFCB
    4.3 %     3.9 %     2.1 %     3.7 %     3.2 %     3.1 %     1.0 %     1.8 %
                                                                 
 
Certain percentage amounts may not sum to total due to rounding.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash provided by operations and borrowings under our credit facility. Historically, our need for capital resources has been driven by our construction of new restaurants. More recently, our need for capital resources has also been driven by repayments of long-term debt, repurchases of our common stock, and purchases of noncontrolling interests.


37


Table of Contents

The following table presents a summary of our cash flows for fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007 (in thousands):
 
                         
    2009     2008     2007  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 160,419     $ 139,753     $ 137,920  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (50,118 )     (87,886 )     (153,344 )
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (87,753 )     (34,971 )     7,890  
                         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  $ 22,548     $ 16,896     $ (7,534 )
                         
 
Operating Activities
 
Our funding requirements since inception have been met through sales of equity securities, debt financing and cash flows from operations. Net cash provided by operating activities exceeded net income for the periods shown due principally to the effect of depreciation and amortization, a net increase in operating liabilities and share-based compensation expense as well as non-cash asset impairment and lease termination charges.
 
Investing Activities
 
We have historically used cash primarily to fund the development and construction of new restaurants. Investment activities primarily related to capital expenditures of $49.9 million, $87.2 million, and $151.6 million in fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Capital expenditures were relatively higher during fiscal 2008 and relatively lower during fiscal 2009 due to the number of new restaurant openings in each year (15 new restaurants during fiscal 2009 compared to 42 new restaurants during fiscal 2008). Also included is capitalized interest of $0.3 million, $0.7 million, and $1.8 million in 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
 
We intend to open three to five new Bistro restaurants and three to five new Pei Wei restaurants in fiscal year 2010. We expect that our planned future Bistro restaurants will require, on average, a total cash investment per restaurant of approximately $2.5 million to $3.0 million(net of estimated tenant incentives). We expect to spend approximately $350,000 to $400,000 per restaurant for preopening costs. Total cash investment per each Pei Wei restaurant is expected to average $750,000 to $850,000 (net of estimated tenant incentives) and we expect to spend approximately $140,000 to $160,000 per restaurant for preopening costs. The anticipated total cash investment per restaurant is based on recent historical averages which have increased over prior years due to increases in construction related costs of steel, aluminum and lumber. We expect total gross capital expenditures for fiscal 2010 to approximate $30.0 million to $40.0 million ($25.0 million to $35.0 million, net of tenant incentives).
 
Financing Activities
 
Financing activities during fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007 included debt repayments of $45.9 million, $12.5 million, and $30.5 million, respectively, and repurchases of common stock of $39.7 million, $10.0 million, and $50.0 million, respectively. Financing activities also included purchases of noncontrolling interests, proceeds from stock options exercised and employee stock purchases, distributions to noncontrolling interest partners, and the tax benefit (shortfall) from share-based compensation, net. Fiscal 2007 also included $96.0 million of credit line borrowings.
 
Future Capital Requirements
 
Our capital requirements, including development costs related to the opening of additional restaurants, have historically been significant. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including the operating performance of our restaurants, the pace of expansion, real estate markets, site locations, the nature of the arrangements negotiated with landlords and any potential repurchases of our common stock.
 
For fiscal 2010, we believe that our cash flow from operations will significantly exceed our projected capital requirements. As a result, we plan to continue evaluating other uses of capital, including, but not limited to, debt repayment, repurchases of our common stock and cash dividends.


38


Table of Contents

In the longer term, in the unlikely event that additional capital is required, we may seek to raise such capital through public or private equity or debt financing. Future capital funding transactions may result in dilution to current shareholders. We cannot ensure that such capital will be available on favorable terms, if at all.
 
Credit Facility
 
On August 31, 2007, we entered into a senior credit facility (“Credit Facility”) with several commercial financial institutions, which allowed for borrowings of up to $150.0 million. On December 15, 2009, we amended the Credit Facility which reduced the borrowings allowed to $75.0 million and modified certain restrictive language regarding restricted payments such as dividends and share repurchases. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by our material existing and future domestic subsidiaries. The Credit Facility expires on August 30, 2013 and contains customary representations, warranties, and negative and affirmative covenants, including a requirement to maintain a maximum leverage ratio, as defined, of 2.5:1 and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined, of 1.25:1, as well as customary events of default and certain default provisions that could result in acceleration of the Credit Facility. We were in compliance with these restrictions and conditions as of January 3, 2010 as our leverage ratio was 1.23:1 and the fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.19:1.
 
As of January 3, 2010, we had borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility totaling $40.0 million as well as $11.2 million committed for the issuance of letters of credit, which is required by insurance companies for our workers’ compensation and general liability insurance programs. We intend to fully repay the outstanding borrowings of $40.0 million under the Credit Facility during fiscal 2010. Available borrowings under the Credit Facility were $23.8 million at January 3, 2010. See Item 7A below for a discussion of interest rates and our interest rate swap.
 
Share Repurchase Program
 
Under share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors, we have repurchased a total of 5.1 million shares of our common stock for $146.0 million at an average price of $28.83 since July 2006. Included in this total are 1.4 million shares of our common stock repurchased during 2009 for $39.7 million at an average price of $27.73. The remaining $0.4 million available under the Company’s previous share repurchase program expired in December 2009.
 
In December 2009, our Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase up to $100.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open market or in private transactions at prevailing market prices over the next two years. We intend to use cash on hand to repurchase shares. We did not repurchase any shares under this authorization during fiscal 2009. We plan to repurchase approximately $40.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock under the $100.0 million repurchase authorization during fiscal 2010.
 
Cash Dividends
 
Based on our desire to consistently return excess cash flow to our shareholders, the Board of Directors has approved the initiation of a quarterly variable cash dividend. The amount of the cash dividend will be computed based on 45% of our quarterly net income and is expected to total approximately $0.90 per share during fiscal 2010.
 
Partnership Activities
 
As of January 3, 2010, there were 40 partners within our partnership system representing 141 partnership interests. During fiscal 2009, we had the opportunity to purchase 18 noncontrolling interests which had reached the five-year threshold period during the year, as well as 79 additional noncontrolling interests which (i) had reached the end of their initial five-year term in prior years (ii) related to partners who left the Company prior to the initial five-year term or (iii) related to partners who requested an early buyout of their interest. We purchased 96 of these noncontrolling interests in their entirety for a total of $4.7 million, all of which was paid in cash.


39


Table of Contents

During fiscal 2010, we will have the opportunity to purchase 11 additional noncontrolling interests which will reach their five-year anniversary. If all of these interests are purchased, the total purchase price will approximate less than $1.0 million based upon the estimated fair value of the respective interests at January 3, 2010.
 
Purchase Commitments
 
The following table shows our purchase commitments by category as of January 3, 2010 (in thousands):
 
                                         
    Payments Due by Period  
          Less
                Greater
 
          Than
    1-3
    3-5
    Than
 
    Total     1 Year     Years     Years     5 Years  
 
Long-term debt
  $ 42,957     $ 41,236     $ 126     $ 128     $ 1,467  
Operating leases
    341,414       49,635       96,184       82,841       112,754  
Capital leases
    3,343       416       832       832       1,263  
Purchase obligations
    205,030       116,142       78,851       10,037        
                                         
Total
  $ 592,744     $ 207,429     $ 175,993     $ 93,838     $ 115,484  
                                         
 
The table above does not include obligations related to lease renewal option periods even if it is reasonably assured that we will exercise the related option. Additionally, purchase obligations have been included only to the extent that our failure to perform would result in formal recourse against us. Accordingly, certain procurement arrangements that require us to purchase future items are included, but only to the extent they include a recourse provision for our failure to purchase.
 
Other Commitments
 
In August 2009, we announced an agreement with FRC Balance LLC, d/b/a True Food Kitchen, to provide debt capital for the early-stage development of True Food Kitchen restaurants. The agreement provides for up to a $10.0 million loan facility to develop True Food Kitchen restaurants and can, under certain conditions, be converted by P.F. Chang’s into a majority equity position in True Food Kitchen. As of January 3, 2010, no borrowings were outstanding under the loan facility.
 
New Accounting Standards
 
See the Recent Accounting Pronouncements section of Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for a summary of new accounting standards.
 
Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
We are exposed to market risk primarily from fluctuations in interest rates on our revolving credit facility and other borrowings as well as from changes in commodities prices.
 
Interest Rates
 
We have exposure to interest rate risk related to our variable rate borrowings. Our revolving credit facility allows for borrowings of up to $75.0 million with outstanding amounts bearing interest at variable rates equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin which is subject to change based on our leverage ratio. At January 3, 2010, we had borrowings of $40.0 million outstanding under our credit facility as well as unsecured promissory notes totaling $1.2 million.
 
During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $40.0 million to hedge a portion of the cash flows of our variable rate borrowings. We have designated the interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of our exposure to variability in future cash flows attributable to interest payments on a $40.0 million tranche of floating rate debt borrowed under our revolving credit facility. Under the terms of the swap, we pay a fixed rate of 3.32% on the $40.0 million notional amount and receive payments from the counterparty based on the 1-month LIBOR rate for a term ending on May 20, 2010, effectively resulting in a fixed rate on the LIBOR component of the $40.0 million notional amount. The effective interest rate on the total


40


Table of Contents

borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility, including the impact of the interest rate swap agreement, was 4.8% as of January 3, 2010.
 
Additionally, by using a derivative instrument to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates, we expose ourselves to credit risk. Credit risk is the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. We seek to minimize the credit risk by entering into transactions with high-quality counterparties whose credit rating is evaluated on a quarterly basis.
 
As of January 3, 2010, based on current interest rates and total borrowings outstanding, including the impact of our interest rate swap, a hypothetical 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have an insignificant pre-tax impact on our results of operations.
 
Commodities Prices
 
We purchase certain commodities such as beef, pork, poultry, seafood and produce. These commodities are generally purchased based upon market prices established with vendors. These purchase arrangements may contain contractual features that fix the price paid for certain commodities. Historically, we have not used financial instruments to hedge commodity prices because these purchase arrangements help control the ultimate cost paid and any significant commodity price increases have historically been relatively short-term in nature.
 
Cash-settled Awards
 
We issued cash-settled awards during fiscal 2009, including performance units, cash-settled stock appreciation rights and cash-settled stock-based awards. The fair value of these awards is remeasured at each reporting period until the awards are settled and is affected by market changes in our stock price and, in the case of performance units, the relative performance of our stock price to the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. Fair value fluctuations are recognized as cumulative adjustments to share-based compensation expense. See Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the fair value of the cash-settled awards and fair value fluctuations of cash-settled awards.


41


Table of Contents

Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
         
    Page
 
Consolidated Financial Statements:
       
    43  
    44  
    45  
    46  
    47  
    48  


42


Table of Contents

 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc.:
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, equity, and cash flows for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective December 29, 2008, the Company has changed its method of accounting and reporting for minority interests such that they will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 17, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
(signed) KPMG LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
February 17, 2010


43


Table of Contents

P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
ASSETS
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 63,499     $ 40,951  
Inventories
    5,291       4,930  
Other current assets
    38,449       51,643  
                 
Total current assets
    107,239       97,524  
Property and equipment, net
    497,928       524,004  
Goodwill
    6,819       6,819  
Intangible assets, net
    22,241       24,270  
Other assets
    17,923       14,746  
                 
Total assets
  $ 652,150     $ 667,363  
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 19,825     $ 15,203  
Construction payable
    1,600       4,358  
Accrued expenses
    77,088       71,162  
Unearned revenue
    35,844       31,115  
Current portion of long-term debt, including $976 and $3,502 due to related parties at January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, respectively
    41,236       5,753  
                 
Total current liabilities
    175,593       127,591  
Lease obligations
    116,547       113,178  
Long-term debt, including $0 and $1,073 due to related parties at January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, respectively
    1,212       82,496  
Other liabilities
    18,488       14,691  
                 
Total liabilities
    311,840       337,956  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
           
Equity:
               
PFCB common stockholders’ equity:
               
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized: 22,911,054 shares and 24,114,107 shares issued and outstanding at January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, respectively
    28       27  
Additional paid-in capital
    217,181       206,667  
Treasury stock, at cost, 5,064,733 shares and 3,634,979 shares at January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, respectively
    (146,022 )     (106,372 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (294 )     (755 )
Retained earnings
    264,456       221,259  
                 
Total PFCB common stockholders’ equity
    335,349       320,826  
Noncontrolling interests
    4,961       8,581  
Total equity
    340,310       329,407  
                 
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 652,150     $ 667,363  
                 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


44


Table of Contents

P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
 
    2010     2008     2007  
 
Revenues
  $ 1,228,179     $ 1,198,124     $ 1,084,193  
Costs and expenses:
                       
Cost of sales
    326,421       325,630       297,242  
Labor
    401,583       396,911       364,074  
Operating
    203,859       198,967       172,147  
Occupancy
    70,635       69,809       62,164  
General and administrative
    82,749       77,488       66,968  
Depreciation and amortization
    74,429       68,711       55,988  
Preopening expense
    3,919       8,457       14,310  
Partner investment expense
    (629 )     (354 )     (2,012 )
                         
Total costs and expenses
    1,162,966       1,145,619       1,030,881  
                         
Income from operations
    65,213       52,505       53,312  
Interest and other income (expense), net
    (1,637 )     (3,362 )     (100 )
                         
Income from continuing operations before taxes
    63,576       49,143       53,212  
Provision for income taxes
    (18,492 )     (12,193 )     (12,420 )
                         
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
    45,084       36,950       40,792  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (479 )     (7,591 )     (4,560 )
                         
Net income
    44,605       29,359       36,232  
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    1,408       1,933       4,169  
                         
Net income attributable to PFCB
  $ 43,197     $ 27,426     $ 32,063  
                         
Basic income per share:
                       
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common stockholders
  $ 1.90     $ 1.47     $ 1.44  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to PFCB common stockholders
    (0.02 )     (0.32 )     (0.18 )
                         
Net income attributable to PFCB common stockholders
  $ 1.88     $ 1.15     $ 1.26  
                         
Diluted income per share:
                       
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common stockholders
  $ 1.87     $ 1.45     $ 1.41  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to PFCB common stockholders
    (0.02 )     (0.31 )     (0.17 )
                         
Net income attributable to PFCB common stockholders
  $ 1.85     $ 1.14     $ 1.24  
                         
Weighted average shares used in computation:
                       
Basic
    22,986       23,776       25,473  
                         
Diluted
    23,413       24,080       25,899  
                         
Amounts attributable to PFCB:
                       
Income from continuing operations, net of tax
  $ 43,676     $ 35,017     $ 36,623  
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
    (479 )     (7,591 )     (4,560 )
                         
Net income attributable to PFCB
  $ 43,197     $ 27,426     $ 32,063  
                         
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


45


Table of Contents

P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
 
                                                                 
    PFCB Common Stockholders  
                            Accumulated
                   
                Additional
          Other
                   
    Common Stock     Paid-In
    Treasury
    Comprehensive
    Retained
    Noncontrolling
       
    Shares     Amount     Capital     Stock     Loss     Earnings     Interests     Total  
 
Balances, December 31, 2006
    25,373     $ 27     $ 174,101     $ (46,373 )   $     $ 161,770     $ 33,315     $ 322,840  
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans
    439             5,617                               5,617  
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
    83             2,174                               2,174  
Issuance of restricted shares under incentive plans, net of forfeitures
    101                                            
Purchases of treasury stock
    (1,844 )                 (49,985 )                       (49,985 )
Share-based compensation expense(1)
                10,512                               10,512  
Tax benefit from share-based compensation, net
                3,981                               3,981  
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners
                                        (6,365 )     (6,365 )
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners
                                        387       387  
Purchases of noncontrolling interests
                                        (13,699 )     (13,699 )
Partner investment expense
                                        (2,012 )     (2,012 )
Partner bonus expense, imputed
                                        1,374       1,374  
Net income
                                  32,063       4,169       36,232  
                                                                 
Balances, December 30, 2007
    24,152       27       196,385       (96,358 )           193,833       17,169       311,056  
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans
    31             284                               284  
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
    31             774                               774  
Issuance of restricted shares under incentive plans, net of forfeitures
    294                                            
Purchases of treasury stock
    (394 )                 (10,014 )                       (10,014 )
Share-based compensation expense(1)
                9,715                               9,715  
Tax shortfall from share-based compensation, net
                (491 )                             (491 )
Unrealized loss on derivatives
                            (755 )                 (755 )
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners
                                        (3,323 )     (3,323 )
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners
                                        245       245  
Purchases of noncontrolling interests
                                        (8,002 )     (8,002 )
Partner investment expense
                                        (354 )     (354 )
Partner bonus expense, imputed
                                        913       913  
Net income
                                  27,426       1,933       29,359  
                                                                 
Balances, December 28, 2008
    24,114       27       206,667       (106,372 )     (755 )     221,259       8,581       329,407  
Issuance of common stock under stock option plans
    241       1       2,891                               2,892  
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan
    34             774                               774  
Shares withheld for taxes on restricted stock, net of forfeitures
    (48 )           (673 )                             (673 )
Purchases of treasury stock
    (1,430 )                 (39,650 )                       (39,650 )
Share-based compensation expense(1)
                7,700                               7,700  
Tax benefit from share-based compensation, net
                1,348                               1,348  
Unrealized gain on derivatives
                            461                   461  
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners
                                        (1,749 )     (1,749 )
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners
                                        50       50  
Purchases of noncontrolling interests
                (1,526 )                       (3,184 )     (4,710 )
Partner investment expense
                                        (629 )     (629 )
Partner bonus expense, imputed
                                        484       484  
Net income
                                  43,197       1,408       44,605  
                                                                 
Balances, January 3, 2010
    22,911     $ 28     $ 217,181     $ (146,022 )   $ (294 )   $ 264,456     $ 4,961     $ 340,310  
                                                                 
 
 
(1) Share-based compensation expense includes equity-settled awards only.
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


46


Table of Contents

P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
 
    2010     2008     2007  
 
Operating Activities:
                       
Net income
  $ 44,605     $ 29,359     $ 36,232  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    74,429       69,661       57,251  
Share-based compensation
    11,552       9,715       10,512  
Non-cash asset impairment and lease termination charges in discontinued operations
    611       9,889       3,125  
Deferred income taxes
    (4,354 )     5,381       4,767  
Partner bonus expense, imputed
    484       913       1,374  
Other
    63       143       167  
Partner investment expense
    (629 )     (354 )     (2,012 )
Tax (benefit) shortfall from share-based compensation, net
    (1,348 )     491       (3,981 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
Inventories
    (361 )     (281 )     (417 )
Other current assets
    17,640       (18,406 )     (786 )
Other assets
    (1,398 )     (434 )     (3,937 )
Accounts payable
    4,622       (2,542 )     2,490  
Accrued expenses
    4,015       9,524       3,411  
Unearned revenue
    4,729       5,769       7,120  
Lease obligations
    4,382       19,914       21,911  
Other liabilities
    1,377       1,011       693  
                         
Net cash provided by operating activities
    160,419       139,753       137,920  
Investing Activities:
                       
Capital expenditures
    (49,865 )     (87,178 )     (151,553 )
Capitalized interest
    (253 )     (708 )     (1,791 )
                         
Net cash used in investing activities
    (50,118 )     (87,886 )     (153,344 )
Financing Activities:
                       
Repayments of long-term debt
    (45,850 )     (12,512 )     (30,475 )
Purchases of treasury stock
    (39,650 )     (10,014 )     (49,985 )
Purchases of noncontrolling interests
    (4,710 )     (9,763 )     (13,032 )
Distributions to noncontrolling interest partners
    (1,749 )     (3,323 )     (6,365 )
Payments of capital lease obligation
    (185 )     (171 )     (158 )
Borrowings on credit facility
                96,000  
Debt issuance costs
                (254 )
Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners
    50       245       387  
Tax benefit (shortfall) from share-based compensation, net
    1,348       (491 )     3,981  
Proceeds from stock options exercised and employee stock purchases
    2,993       1,058       7,791  
                         
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (87,753 )     (34,971 )     7,890  
                         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    22,548       16,896       (7,534 )
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
    40,951       24,055       31,589  
                         
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
  $ 63,499     $ 40,951     $ 24,055  
                         
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
                       
Cash paid for interest
  $ 3,478     $ 5,442     $ 1,907  
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
  $ 11,782     $ 9,842     $ 4,615  
                         
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Items:
                       
Purchases of noncontrolling interests through issuance of long-term-debt
  $     $ 2,693     $ 11,732  
Change in construction payable
  $ (2,758 )   $ (6,961 )   $ 2,244  
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.


47


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
January 3, 2010
 
1.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Organization and Nature of Operations
 
P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc. (the “Company”) operates two restaurant concepts consisting of restaurants throughout the United States under the names P.F. Chang’s China Bistro (“Bistro”) and Pei Wei Asian Diner (“Pei Wei”). The Company was formed in 1996 and became publicly traded in 1998.
 
Fiscal Year
 
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to the end of December. Fiscal year 2009 was comprised of 53 weeks and fiscal years 2008 and 2007 were each comprised of 52 weeks.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Principles of Consolidation and Presentation
 
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All material balances and transactions between the consolidated entities have been eliminated. Beginning fiscal 2009, noncontrolling interests (previously shown as minority interest) are reported below net income under the heading “Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests” in the consolidated income statements and shown as a component of equity in the consolidated balance sheets. See Recent Accounting Literature for further discussion.
 
Reclassifications
 
Certain amounts shown in the prior periods’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year consolidated financial statement presentation.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
The Company’s cash and cash equivalent balances are not pledged or restricted. The Company’s policy is to invest cash in excess of operating requirements in income-producing investments. Income-producing investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of investment are reflected as cash equivalents. Amounts receivable from credit card processors are also considered cash equivalents because they are both short-term and highly liquid in nature and are typically converted to cash within three days of the sales transaction. Cash equivalents as of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008 consisted primarily of money market fund investments and amounts receivable from credit card processors.
 
Receivables
 
Receivables, which the Company classifies within other current assets, consist primarily of amounts due from landlords for tenant incentives and amounts due from third-party gift card sales. Management believes outstanding amounts to be collectible.
 
Inventories
 
Inventories consist of food and beverages and are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method.


48


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment is stated at cost, which includes capitalized interest during the construction and development period. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful service lives of the related assets, which approximate seven years. The Company’s home office building is depreciated on a straight-line basis over 30 years, and building improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over 20 years. Leasehold improvements and buildings under capital leases are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the length of the related lease term. The term of the lease includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal option can be reasonably assured and failure to exercise such option would result in an economic penalty. China and smallwares are generally depreciated over two years up to 50 percent of their original cost and replacements are recorded as operating expenses as they are purchased.
 
Depreciation and amortization expense included in continuing operations includes the depreciation and amortization of fixed assets, gains and losses on disposal of assets and the amortization of intangible assets, non-transferable liquor license fees and capitalized software costs, which totaled $74.4 million, $68.7 million and $56.0 million for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense included in continuing operations associated with property and equipment, including property under capital leases, which totaled $71.0 million, $65.5 million, and $53.3 million for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007, respectively.
 
During the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007, the Company incurred gross interest expense of $3.1 million, $4.8 million, and $2.5 million, respectively. Of these amounts, $0.3 million, $0.7 million, and $1.8 million, respectively, were capitalized during the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007.
 
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
 
Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment tests. Intangible assets deemed to have definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives.
 
Goodwill
 
Goodwill represents the residual purchase price after allocation of the purchase price of assets acquired and relates to the Company’s purchase of interests in various restaurants at the formation of the Company. Impairment tests are performed with respect to goodwill at the segment level of reporting. On an annual basis, the Company reviews the recoverability of goodwill based primarily on a multiple of earnings analysis which compares the estimated fair value of the reporting segment to the carrying value. As a secondary review, the Company also compares the market value of its common stock to the total Company carrying value. Generally, the Company performs its annual assessment for impairment during the fourth quarter of its fiscal year and performs the analysis more frequently if there are any impairment indicators identified during the year. As of January 3, 2010, management determined there was no impairment of goodwill. There can be no assurance that future goodwill impairment tests will not result in a charge to earnings.
 
Intangible Assets
 
Intangible assets were historically recognized upon the Company’s buyout of noncontrolling interests when the Company’s purchase price exceeded the imputed fair value at the time of the partners’ original investment. Beginning fiscal 2009 upon the adoption of new accounting guidance, an intangible asset is no longer recognized upon buyout of noncontrolling interests. Instead, any excess of the Company’s purchase price over the imputed fair value is recognized as additional-paid-in-capital in equity. See Noncontrolling Interests in Recent Accounting


49


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Literature for further discussion. Intangible assets outstanding as of December 28, 2008 continue to be amortized over their useful lives.
 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
 
The Company reviews property and equipment and intangible assets with finite lives (those assets resulting from the acquisition of partner’s noncontrolling interests in the operating rights of certain of our restaurants) for impairment when events or circumstances indicate these assets might be impaired, but at least quarterly. An analysis is performed at the individual restaurant level and primarily includes an assessment of historical cash flows and other relevant facts and circumstances. For restaurants open greater than two years, negative restaurant-level cash flows over the previous twelve-month period is considered a potential impairment indicator. In these situations, the Company evaluates future restaurant cash flow projections in conjunction with qualitative factors and future operating plans. Based on this assessment, the Company either (a) continues to monitor these restaurants over the near-term for evidence of improved performance or (b) immediately recognizes an impairment charge based on the amount by which the asset carrying value exceeds fair value, which is based on undiscounted future cash flows.
 
In the past, restaurants under monitoring have typically achieved cash flow improvements in a timely fashion such that no impairment charge was deemed necessary and the restaurant was removed from active monitoring. During the year-ended December 28, 2008, the Company recognized non-cash asset impairment charges of $7.5 million ($4.6 million net of tax) related to the write-off of the carrying value of the long-lived assets associated with the closure of 10 Pei Wei stores. During the year-ended December 30, 2007, the Company recognized an asset impairment charge of $3.1 million ($2.1 million net of tax) related to the write-off of the carrying value of the long-lived assets of Taneko associated with the fiscal 2008 asset sale. See Note 2 for further discussion. No other impairment of long-lived assets was recognized by the Company during the years ended December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007. There were no impairments recognized by the Company during the year ended January 3, 2010. There can be no assurance that future impairment tests will not result in additional charges to earnings.
 
The Company’s impairment assessment process requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding future cash flows and operating outcomes, which are subject to a significant degree of judgment based on experience and knowledge. These estimates can be significantly impacted by changes in the economic environment, real estate market conditions and overall operating performance. At any given time, the Company is actively monitoring a small number of restaurants and impairment charges could be triggered in the future if individual restaurant performance does not improve or if management decides to close that location. Also, if current economic conditions worsen, additional restaurants could be placed on active monitoring and potentially trigger impairment charges in future periods.
 
Other Assets
 
Other assets consist primarily of transferable and nontransferable liquor licenses, capitalized software costs, deferred compensation plan assets (see Note 13 for additional information), vendor deposits, trademarks and deferred financing costs. Nontransferable liquor licenses and trademarks are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the length of the related lease or contract term. The term of the lease or contract includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal option can be reasonably assured and failure to exercise such option would result in an economic penalty. Capitalized software costs are typically amortized over five years. See Note 6 for additional details on the Company’s other assets.
 
Accrued Insurance
 
The Company is self-insured for certain exposures, principally medical and dental, general liability and workers’ compensation, for the first $100,000, $250,000 or $500,000 of individual claims, depending on the type of claim. The Company has paid amounts to its insurance carrier that approximate the cost of claims known to date and has accrued additional liabilities for its estimate of ultimate costs related to those claims. In developing these estimates, the Company uses historical experience factors to estimate the ultimate claim exposure. The Company’s self insurance liabilities are actuarially determined and consider estimates of expected losses, based on statistical


50


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
analyses of the Company’s actual historical trends as well as historical industry data. It is reasonably possible that future adjustments to these estimates will be required. Management believes the Company has provided adequate reserves for its self-insured exposure.
 
Lease Obligations
 
The Company leases all of its restaurant properties. At the inception of the lease, each property is evaluated to determine whether the lease will be accounted for as an operating or capital lease. The term of the lease used for this evaluation includes renewal option periods only in instances in which the exercise of the renewal option can be reasonably assured and failure to exercise such option would result in an economic penalty.
 
The Company accounts for tenant incentives received from its landlords in connection with certain of its operating leases as a deferred rent liability within lease obligations and amortizes such amounts over the relevant lease term. For leases that contain rent escalations, the Company records the total rent payable during the lease term, as determined above, on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease (including the “rent holiday” period beginning upon possession of the premises), and records the difference between the minimum rents paid and the straight-line rent as a lease obligation.
 
Certain leases contain provisions that require additional rental payments based upon restaurant sales volume (“contingent rent”). Contingent rent is accrued each period as the liability is incurred, in addition to the straight-line rent expense noted above.
 
Other Liabilities
 
Other liabilities include the Company’s conditional asset retirement obligations (“ARO”), which are primarily associated with certain of the Company’s restaurant leases under which the landlord has the option to require, at a future date, the Company to remove its leasehold improvements at the end of the lease term and return the property to the landlord in its original condition. The Company estimates the fair value of these liabilities based on estimated store closing costs, accretes that current cost forward to the date of estimated ARO removal and discounts the future cost back as if it were performed at the inception of the lease. At the inception of such a lease, the Company records the ARO liability and also records a related capital asset in an amount equal to the estimated fair value of the liability. The ARO liability is accreted to its future value, with accretion expense recognized as interest and other income, net, and the capitalized asset is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset, which is generally the life of the leasehold improvement. The estimate of the conditional asset retirement liability is based on a number of assumptions requiring management’s judgment, including store closing costs, inflation rates and discount rates. As a result, in future periods the Company may make adjustments to the ARO liability as a result of the availability of new information, changes in estimated costs, inflation rates and other factors. See Note 12 for further details of the Company’s other liabilities.
 
Other liabilities also include the Company’s net long-term deferred tax liabilities, liabilities related to the Company’s deferred compensation plans (discussed further in Note 13) and a derivative liability (discussed further in this footnote and Note 8).
 
Unearned Revenue
 
The Company sells gift cards to customers in its restaurants, through its websites and via other retail outlets. Unearned revenue represents gift cards sold for which revenue recognition criteria, generally redemption, has not been met. These amounts are presented net of any discounts issued by the Company in connection with the terms of its third-party gift card distribution agreements.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Revenues from food, beverage and alcohol sales are recognized as products are sold.
 
The Company recognizes income from gift cards when: (i) the gift card is redeemed by the customer; or (ii) the likelihood of the gift card being redeemed by the customer is remote (gift card breakage) and the Company


51


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
determines there is no legal obligation to remit the value of unredeemed gift cards to the relevant jurisdictions. The Company determines the gift card breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns. Gift card breakage income was not significant in any fiscal year and is reported within revenues in the consolidated statements of income.
 
Initial territory fees received pursuant to licensing agreements are recognized as revenue when the Company has performed its material obligations under the agreement, which is typically after the opening of a certain number of restaurants within the territory. Store opening fees are recognized as revenue when the Company has substantially performed its obligations to assist the licensee in opening a new restaurant, which is generally at the time such restaurant opens for business. Ongoing royalty fees from licensed restaurants are based on a percentage of restaurant sales and are recognized as revenue in the period the related restaurants’ revenues are earned.
 
Ongoing royalty fees from retail product are based on a percentage of product sales, and are recognized as revenue upon the sale of the product to retail outlets.
 
Advertising
 
The Company expenses advertising production costs at the time the advertising first takes place. All other advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007 was $10.4 million, $9.2 million, and $5.5 million, respectively.
 
Partner Bonus Expense, Imputed
 
Partner bonus expense, imputed, which is classified within labor expense on the consolidated statements of income, represents the portion of restaurant level operating results that is allocable to certain noncontrolling partners, but which is presented as bonus expense for accounting purposes. Specifically, given that employees who choose to invest as partners are not eligible to participate in restaurant-level bonus programs, a portion of their partnership earnings that would otherwise be presented as net income attributable to noncontrolling interests expense is deemed to be a bonus expense for financial reporting purposes. The amounts imputed are based on existing bonus programs used by the Company for non-investing employees based on individual restaurant-level operating results. Partner bonus expense, imputed for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007 was $0.5 million, $0.9 million, and $1.4 million, respectively.
 
Preopening Expense
 
Preopening expense, consisting primarily of manager salaries, employee payroll and related training costs incurred prior to the opening of a restaurant, is expensed as incurred. Preopening expense also includes the accrual for straight-line rent recorded during the period between date of possession and the restaurant opening date for the Company’s leased restaurant locations.
 
Partner Investment Expense
 
Partner investment expense generally represents the difference between the imputed fair value of noncontrolling interests at the time the partners invest in their restaurants and the partners’ cash capital contribution for these ownership interests. Additionally, for those interests that are bought out prior to the restaurant reaching maturity (typically after five years of operation), partner investment expense includes a reversal of previously recognized expense for the difference between the fair value of the noncontrolling interest at inception date and the fair value at the date of repurchase, to the extent that the former is greater.
 
Consolidated partner investment expense for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007 was a net benefit of $0.6 million, $0.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively. See Note 16 for further discussion on the Company’s partnership structure.


52


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Taxes
 
The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes in which deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Recognition of deferred tax assets is limited to amounts considered by management to be more likely than not of realization in future periods.
 
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. See Note 17 for additional information regarding the change in unrecognized tax benefits.
 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests relating to the income or loss of consolidated partnerships includes no provision for income taxes as any tax liability related thereto is the responsibility of the individual noncontrolling interest investors.
 
Additionally, the Company presents sales tax on a net basis in its consolidated financial statements.
 
Share-Based Compensation
 
The Company has granted equity-settled and liability-settled awards to certain of its employees and directors, and accounts for the awards based on the fair value measurement guidance. The estimated fair value of share-based compensation is amortized to expense over the vesting period. See Note 13 for further discussion of related accounting for share-based compensation.
 
Income from Continuing Operations Attributable to PFCB per Share
 
Basic income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB per share is computed based on the weighted average of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive securities, which includes options, restricted stock and RSUs outstanding under the Company’s equity plans and employee stock purchase plan. For the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007, 2.1 million, 2.3 million, and 1.6 million, respectively, of the Company’s options were excluded from the calculation due to their anti-dilutive effect.
 
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB per share:
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
 
    2010     2008     2007  
 
Numerator:
                       
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common stockholders, net of tax
  $ 43,676     $ 35,017     $ 36,623  
                         
Denominator:
                       
Basic: Weighted-average shares outstanding during the year
    22,986       23,776       25,473  
Add: Dilutive effect of equity awards
    427       304       426  
                         
Diluted
    23,413       24,080       25,899  
                         
Income from continuing operations attributable to PFCB common stockholders per share:
                       
Basic
  $ 1.90     $ 1.47     $ 1.44  
                         
Diluted
  $ 1.87     $ 1.45     $ 1.41  
                         


53


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, and accrued expenses is deemed to approximate fair value due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of long-term debt approximates the carrying value due to the Company’s right to repay outstanding balances at any time.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash investments and receivables. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents, funds on deposit and certain other financial instruments with financial institutions that are considered in the Company’s investment strategy. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to receivables are limited as the Company’s receivables are primarily related to tenant incentives from landlords and third party gift card sales.
 
Derivatives
 
All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value as either assets or liabilities. The fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments is determined using either market quotes or valuation models that are based upon the net present value of estimated future cash flows and incorporate current market data inputs. The Company reports its derivative assets or liabilities in other assets, other liabilities, other current assets or accrued expenses as applicable. The accounting for the change in the fair value of a derivative financial instrument depends on its intended use and the resulting hedge designation, if any, as discussed below.
 
A cash flow hedge is a derivative designed to hedge the exposure of variable future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with an existing recognized asset or liability, or a forecasted transaction. The Company utilizes the hypothetical derivative method to measure hedge effectiveness. For derivative financial instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the gain or loss on the derivatives are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income and reclassified into earnings when the hedged cash flows are recognized into earnings. The amount that is reclassified into earnings, as well as any ineffective portion of the gain or loss, as determined by the accounting requirements, are reported as a component of interest and other income (expense). If a hedge is de-designated or terminated prior to maturity, the amount previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income is recognized into earnings over the period that the hedged item impacts earnings. If a hedge relationship is discontinued because it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur according to the original strategy, any related amounts previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income are recognized into earnings immediately. There was no hedge ineffectiveness recognized during the periods ended January 3, 2010, and December 28, 2008.
 
During the second quarter of 2008, the Company hedged a portion of its existing long-term variable-rate debt through the use of an interest rate swap. This derivative instrument effectively fixes the interest expense on a portion of the Company’s long-term debt for the duration of the swap. See Note 8 for further discussion of the Company’s interest rate swap.
 
Recent Accounting Literature
 
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification
 
(Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-01)
 
In June 2009, FASB approved the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“the Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP. All existing accounting standard documents, such as FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force and other related literature, excluding guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), have been superseded by the


54


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Codification. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification has become nonauthoritative. The Codification did not change GAAP, but instead introduced a new structure that combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. The Codification is effective for interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, and impacts the Company’s financial statements as all future references to authoritative accounting literature will be referenced in accordance with the Codification. There have been no changes to the content of the Company’s financial statements or disclosures as a result of implementing the Codification.
 
As a result of the Company’s implementation of the Codification during fiscal 2009, previous references to new accounting standards and literature are no longer applicable. In the current year financial statements, the Company will provide reference to both new and old guidance to assist in understanding the impacts of recently adopted accounting literature, particularly for guidance adopted since the beginning of the current fiscal year but prior to the Codification.
 
Subsequent Events
 
(Included in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 855 “Subsequent Events”, previously SFAS No. 165 “Subsequent Events”)
 
SFAS No. 165 established general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued (“subsequent events”). An entity is required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and the basis for that date. For public entities, this is the date the financial statements are issued. SFAS No. 165 does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other GAAP and did not result in significant changes in the subsequent events reported by the Company. SFAS No. 165 became effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company evaluated for subsequent events through February 17, 2010, the issuance date of the Company’s financial statements. No recognized subsequent events were noted. See Note 21 for a discussion of the Company’s non-recognized subsequent events.
 
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
 
(Included in ASC 350 “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other”, previously FSP SFAS No. 142-3 “Determination of the Useful Lives of Intangible Assets”)
 
FSP SFAS No. 142-3 amended the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under previously issued goodwill and intangible assets topics. This change was intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under topics related to business combinations and other GAAP. The requirement for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. FSP SFAS No. 142-3 became effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of FSP SFAS No. 142-3 did not impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
(Included in ASC 810 “Consolidation”, previously SFAS No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51”)
 
SFAS No. 160 changed the accounting and reporting for minority interests such that they will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. SFAS No. 160 became effective for fiscal


55


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
years beginning after December 15, 2008 with early application prohibited. The Company implemented SFAS No. 160 at the start of fiscal 2009 and no longer records an intangible asset when the purchase price of a noncontrolling interest exceeds the book value at the time of buyout. Any excess or shortfall for buyouts of noncontrolling interests in mature restaurants is recognized as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital in stockholders’ equity. Any shortfall resulting from the early buyout of noncontrolling interests will continue to be recognized as a benefit in partner investment expense up to the initial amount recognized at the time of buy-in. Additionally, operating losses can be allocated to noncontrolling interests even when such allocation results in a deficit balance (i.e. book value can go negative).
 
The Company presents noncontrolling interests (previously shown as minority interest) as a component of equity on its consolidated balance sheets. Minority interest expense is no longer separately reported as a reduction to net income on the consolidated income statement, but is instead shown below net income under the heading “net income attributable to noncontrolling interests.” The adoption of SFAS No. 160 did not have any other material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities — Amended
 
(Included in ASC 810 “Consolidation”, SFAS No. 167 “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”)
 
SFAS No. 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” regarding certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity and modifies the methods allowed for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The amendments include: (1) the elimination of the exemption for qualifying special purpose entities, (2) a new approach for determining who should consolidate a variable-interest entity, and (3) changes to when it is necessary to reassess who should consolidate a variable-interest entity. SFAS No. 167 is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009, with earlier adoption prohibited. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 167 in fiscal 2010 and does not anticipate any material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
2.   Discontinued Operations
 
Discontinued operations include results attributable to 10 Pei Wei restaurants that were closed during the fourth quarter of 2008 and Taneko Japanese Tavern (“Taneko”), a third restaurant concept developed in 2006 whose assets were sold on August 1, 2008. Loss from discontinued operations includes both the historical results of operations as well as estimated and actual lease termination costs associated with the 10 closed Pei Wei restaurants and Taneko.
 
Pei Wei
 
As part of ongoing profitability initiatives, the Company closed 10 underperforming Pei Wei restaurants during the fourth quarter of 2008. This decision, which was reached during the third quarter of 2008, was the result of a rigorous evaluation of the Company’s entire store portfolio. The Company reviewed each location’s past and present operating performance combined with projected future results. The restaurants selected for closure had lower profitability and were not projected to provide acceptable returns in the foreseeable future.
 
During the second half of fiscal 2008, the Company recognized a non-cash asset impairment charge of $7.5 million ($4.6 million net of tax) related to the write-off of the carrying value of long-lived assets associated with the 10 Pei Wei store closures, which was included in discontinued operations. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company recognized additional pretax charges of $2.6 million related to estimated and actual lease termination costs and $0.1 million related to severance payments made in connection with the store closures, which was included in discontinued operations. During fiscal 2009, the Company recognized additional pretax charges of $1.4 million related to estimated and actual lease termination costs.


56


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The Company is pursuing lease termination agreements with each of the closed Pei Wei restaurant’s landlords as well as potential sub-tenant agreements. Lease termination agreements for seven of the ten locations have been executed as of the date of this Form 10-K.
 
Activity associated with the lease termination accrual is summarized below (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Beginning Balance
  $ 2,379     $  
Cash payments
    (2,402 )     (197 )
Charges
    1,439       2,576  
                 
Ending Balance
  $ 1,416     $ 2,379  
                 
 
Charges include additional amounts recognized based on availability of new information which led to updated estimates of anticipated lease termination costs for certain closed locations where the accrual recorded at the time of lease termination was insufficient. Cash payments include settlement payments as well as ongoing rent and other property-related payments. From store closure date through January 3, 2010, the Company has recognized and reported in discontinued operations a total of $4.0 million in lease termination charges for the closed Pei Wei locations. The lease termination accrual is included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets with the timing of payments uncertain.
 
Goodwill allocated to the Pei Wei concept totaled $0.3 million. The Company did not record any impairment to Pei Wei goodwill related to the fiscal 2008 store closures.
 
The Company determined that each individual Pei Wei restaurant represents a component of an entity since each store has separately identifiable operations and cash flows. Each restaurant is therefore considered a reporting unit in accordance with accounting guidance for goodwill and intangible assets. The ten closed restaurants were not in close proximity to other Pei Wei restaurants and the Company does not anticipate having significant ongoing cash inflows or outflows related to these operations subsequent to closure and lease termination. As a result, the Company determined that the Pei Wei restaurant closures met the criteria for classification as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. As a result, all historical operating results as well as asset impairment, lease termination and severance charges related to the closed stores are reflected within discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.
 
Taneko
 
The Company opened its Taneko Japanese Tavern (“Taneko”) restaurant on October 1, 2006 in Scottsdale, Arizona. As a result of the operating losses realized by Taneko and management’s increased focus on the Company’s core Bistro and Pei Wei restaurant concepts, at the end of fiscal 2007 the Company decided to exit operation of the Taneko business. As of December 30, 2007, the Company classified Taneko as held for sale and determined that Taneko met the criteria for classification as a discontinued operation in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company recognized a non-cash asset impairment charge of $3.1 million ($2.1 million net of tax) related to the write-off of the carrying value of Taneko’s long-lived assets, which was included in discontinued operations. On August 1, 2008, the Company completed the sale of Taneko’s long-lived assets.


57


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
Loss from Discontinued Operations
 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax is comprised of the following (in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
 
    2010     2008     2007  
 
Revenues
  $     $ 9,597     $ 11,089  
Lease termination charges
    1,439       2,576        
Severance charges
          93        
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax benefit(1)
    (786 )     (4,932 )     (3,951 )
Income tax benefit
    307       1,923       1,444  
                         
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, before asset impairment charges
    (479 )     (3,009 )     (2,507 )
Asset impairment charges, net of tax
          (4,582 )     (2,053 )
                         
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
  $ (479 )   $ (7,591 )   $ (4,560 )
                         
 
 
(1) Includes lease termination charges, deferred rent write-offs upon lease termination and deferred rent amortization
 
3.   Other Current Assets
 
Other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Receivables
  $ 15,752     $ 24,867  
Current portion of deferred tax asset
    11,036       8,344  
Prepaid rent
    5,508       5,180  
Income taxes receivable
    2,388       9,960  
Other
    3,765       3,292  
                 
Total other current assets
  $ 38,449     $ 51,643  
                 
 
Receivables as of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008 are primarily comprised of amounts due from landlords for tenant incentives as a result of new restaurant openings and amounts due from third-party gift card sales.
 
4.   Property and Equipment
 
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Land
  $ 3,681     $ 3,681  
Building and improvements
    15,357       15,337  
Leasehold improvements
    600,798       576,861  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
    182,970       167,153  
China and smallwares
    17,883       17,169  
                 
      820,689       780,201  
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (325,108 )     (262,775 )
                 
      495,581       517,426  
Add: Construction in progress
    2,347       6,578  
                 
Property and equipment, net
  $ 497,928     $ 524,004  
                 


58


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
5.   Intangible Assets
 
Intangible assets consists of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Intangible assets, gross
  $ 29,863     $ 29,863  
Accumulated amortization
    (7,622 )     (5,593 )
                 
Intangible assets, net
  $ 22,241     $ 24,270  
                 
 
Amortization expense related to intangible assets included in depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated income statement, for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007 was $2.0 million, $2.2 million, and $1.7 million, respectively.
 
The estimated aggregate annual amortization expense for intangible assets at January 3, 2010, is summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
         
2010
  $ 2,240  
2011
    2,240  
2012
    2,225  
2013
    2,215  
2014
    2,127  
Thereafter
    11,194  
         
Total
  $ 22,241  
         
 
6.   Other Assets
 
Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Software, net
  $ 5,459     $ 4,581  
Liquor licenses, net
    6,836       6,632  
Deferred compensation
    3,454       1,272  
Deposits
    1,411       1,898  
Other assets, net
    763       363  
                 
Total other assets
  $ 17,923     $ 14,746  
                 
 
7.   Accrued Expenses
 
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Accrued payroll
  $ 26,262     $ 25,409  
Accrued insurance
    17,426       16,130  
Sales and use tax payable
    7,104       5,026  
Property tax payable
    3,638       4,151  
Accrued rent
    3,730       4,315  
Derivative Liability(1)
    471        
Other accrued expenses
    18,457       16,131  
                 
Total accrued expenses
  $ 77,088     $ 71,162  
                 
 
 
(1) Derivative Liability was reclassified from other liabilities during fiscal year 2009


59


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
8.   Credit Facility
 
On August 31, 2007, the Company entered into a senior credit facility (“Credit Facility”) with several commercial financial institutions, which allowed for borrowings of up to $150.0 million. On December 15, 2009, the Company amended the Credit Facility which reduced the borrowings allowed to $75.0 million and modified certain restrictive language regarding restricted payments such as dividends and share repurchases. The Credit Facility expires on August 30, 2013 and contains customary representations, warranties, negative and affirmative covenants, including a requirement to maintain a maximum leverage ratio, as defined, of 2.5:1 and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined, of 1.25:1, as well as customary events of default and certain default provisions that could result in acceleration of the Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with these restrictions and conditions as of January 3, 2010 as the Company’s leverage ratio was 1.23:1 and the fixed charge coverage ratio was 2.19:1.
 
The Credit Facility is guaranteed by the Company’s material existing and future domestic subsidiaries. As of January 3, 2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility totaling $40.0 million as well as $11.2 million committed for the issuance of letters of credit, which is required by insurance companies for the Company’s workers’ compensation and general liability insurance programs. Available borrowings under the Credit Facility were $23.8 million at January 3, 2010.
 
Interest Rate Swap
 
During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $40.0 million. The purpose of this transaction is to provide a hedge against the effects of changes in interest rates on a portion of the Company’s current variable rate borrowings. The Company has designated the interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge of its exposure to variability in future cash flows attributable to interest payments on a $40.0 million tranche of floating rate debt.
 
Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company pays a fixed rate of 3.32% on the $40.0 million notional amount and receives payments from its counterparty based on the 1-month LIBOR rate for a term ending on May 20, 2010, effectively resulting in a fixed rate on the LIBOR component of the $40.0 million notional amount. Interest rate differentials paid or received under the swap agreement are recognized as adjustments to interest expense.
 
At January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the recorded fair value of the interest rate swap was a liability of $0.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively ($0.3 million and $0.8 million, net of tax, respectively). The interest rate swap is reported in the consolidated balance sheets within accrued expenses at January 3, 2010 and other liabilities at December 28, 2008 and is offset by a corresponding amount in equity, representing net unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. Such amounts will be recognized in the consolidated income statement over the remainder of the term ending on May 20, 2010. At January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, accumulated other comprehensive loss, as reflected in equity, consisted of unrealized losses on derivatives totaling $0.3 million and $0.8 million, net of tax, respectively. For the fiscal years ended January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, a $0.5 million unrealized gain and $0.8 million unrealized loss, respectively, was recorded in other comprehensive loss. There was no hedge ineffectiveness recognized during the fiscal years ended January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008.


60


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
9.   Long-Term Debt
 
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Credit line borrowings (see Note 8)
  $ 40,000     $ 80,000  
Unsecured promissory notes — related parties, maturing February 2010 through November 2010
    976       4,575  
Unsecured promissory notes — non-related parties, maturing March 2010 through May 2010
    197       2,126  
Other
    1,275       1,548  
                 
Total debt
    42,448       88,249  
Less: current portion
    41,236       5,753  
                 
Total long-term debt
  $ 1,212     $ 82,496  
                 
 
Unsecured promissory notes relate to the Company’s purchase of noncontrolling interests and have interest rates of 65 to 75 basis points over LIBOR. Such notes are classified as related party for those partners who remain associated with the Company after the purchase of their interests. Other debt is presented net of debt discounts and is primarily comprised of non-interest-bearing promissory notes related to the purchase of certain of the Company’s liquor licenses.
 
The aggregate annual payments of long-term debt outstanding at January 3, 2010, are summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
         
2010
  $ 41,236  
2011
    63  
2012
    63  
2013
    64  
2014
    64  
Thereafter
    1,467  
         
Total
    42,957  
Less: debt discount
    (509 )
         
Total debt
  $ 42,448  
         
 
Note:  The Credit Facility expires on August 30, 2013. However, the Company intends to repay total outstanding credit line borrowings of $40.0 million during fiscal 2010. As such, the aggregate amount due in 2010 shown above includes outstanding credit line borrowings totaling $40.0 million as of January 3, 2010. Such amount is included in the current portion of long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet as of January 3, 2010.


61


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
10.   Fair Value Measurements
 
The Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value at January 3, 2010 are summarized below (in thousands):
 
                                     
          Quoted Prices in
    Significant
           
          Active Markets for
    Other
    Significant
     
          Identical
    Observable
    Unobservable
     
    January 3,
    Assets/Liabilities
    Inputs
    Inputs
    Valuation
    2010     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Technique
 
Money Markets
  $ 54,655     $     $ 54,655     $     market approach
Restoration Plan investments
    3,454             3,454           market approach
Interest rate swap liability
    (471 )           (471 )         income approach
                                     
Total
  $ 57,638     $     $ 57,638     $      
                                     
 
The Company invests excess cash in money market funds and reflects these amounts within cash and cash equivalents on the consolidated balance sheet at a net value of 1:1 for each dollar invested. Money market investments held by the Company were invested primarily in government backed securities at January 3, 2010.
 
The Company’s Restoration Plan investments are considered trading securities and are reported at fair value based on third party broker statements and are reflected within other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The realized and unrealized holding gains and losses related to these investments are recorded in interest and other income (expense), net in the consolidated income statements.
 
The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap is estimated using the net present value of a series of cash flows on both the fixed and floating legs of the swap and is reflected within accrued expenses at January 3, 2010 and other liabilities at December 28, 2008 in the consolidated balance sheet. These cash flows are based on yield curves which take into account the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity and market-based parameters such as interest rates and volatility. The yield curves used in the valuation model are based on published data for counterparties with an AA rating. Market practice in pricing derivatives initially assumes all counterparties have the same credit quality. The Company mitigates derivative credit risk by transacting with highly rated counterparties. Management has evaluated credit and nonperformance risks and believes them to be insignificant and not warranting a credit adjustment at January 3, 2010. See Note 8 for a discussion of the Company’s interest rate swap.
 
11.   Leases
 
The Company leases certain buildings and land which are considered capital leases and are included in property and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization of assets under capital leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense.
 
Capital lease assets consist of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Capital lease assets, gross
  $ 4,494     $ 4,494  
Accumulated amortization
    (2,507 )     (2,278 )
                 
Capital lease assets, net
  $ 1,987     $ 2,216  
                 


62


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The related capital lease obligations are reported within lease obligations and consist of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Building
  $ 2,062     $ 2,246  
Land
    1,050       1,050  
                 
Capital lease obligations
  $ 3,112     $ 3,296  
                 
 
The Company leases restaurant facilities and certain real property as well as equipment under operating leases having terms expiring between 2010 and 2025. The restaurant facility and real property leases primarily have renewal clauses of five to 20 years exercisable at the option of the Company. Certain renewal terms contain rent escalation clauses stipulating specific rent increases, some of which are based on the consumer price index. Additionally, certain leases require the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of gross revenues, as defined in the leases.
 
Rent expense included in occupancy expense in the consolidated statements of income for operating leases is summarized as follows (in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
 
    2010     2008     2007  
 
Minimum rent
  $ 37,215     $ 35,052     $ 30,511  
Contingent rent
    8,873       10,127       9,626  
                         
Total rent expense
  $ 46,088     $ 45,179     $ 40,137  
                         
 
At January 3, 2010, the Company had signed lease agreements for unopened restaurants with total minimum lease payment obligations of $7.1 million. The following table does not include lease obligations related to renewal option periods even if it is reasonably assured that the Company will exercise the related option. Future minimum lease payments under capital and operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
 
                         
          Operating
       
    Capital Leases     Leases     Total  
 
2010
  $ 416     $ 49,635     $ 50,051  
2011
    416       48,774       49,190  
2012
    416       47,410       47,826  
2013
    416       44,008       44,424  
2014
    416       38,833       39,249  
Thereafter
    1,263       112,754       114,017  
                         
Total minimum lease payments
    3,343     $ 341,414     $ 344,757  
                         
Less: Amount representing interest
    1,346                  
                         
Present value of minimum lease payments
  $ 1,997                  
                         
 
The Company leases a building and certain furniture and equipment from a partnership in which the Company owns an approximate seven percent interest. Annual rent payments are contingent based on a percentage of gross revenues. The respective period rent expense is included in the amounts disclosed above.


63


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
12.   Other Liabilities
 
Other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Deferred income tax liability
  $ 9,436     $ 10,399  
Deferred compensation
    3,653       1,423  
Performance units
    2,402        
Cash-settled awards
    1,453        
Derivative liability(1)
          1,227  
Other
    1,544       1,642  
                 
Total other liabilities
  $ 18,488     $ 14,691  
                 
 
 
(1) Derivative liability was reclassified to accrued expenses during fiscal year 2009
 
13.   Preferred Stock and PFCB Common Stockholders’ Equity
 
Preferred Stock
 
The board of directors is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the powers, preferences, privileges, rights, including voting rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of those shares without any further vote or act by the common stockholders. There was no outstanding preferred stock as of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008.
 
Stock Option Plans
 
1996 and 1997 Plans
 
In August 1996, the Company adopted the 1996 Stock Option Plan (“1996 Plan”), and in July 1997, the Company adopted the 1997 Restaurant Management Stock Option Plan (“1997 Plan”). Options under the 1996 Plan may be granted to employees, consultants and directors to purchase the Company’s common stock at an exercise price that equals or exceeds the fair value of such shares on the date such option is granted. Options under the 1997 Plan may be granted to key employees of the Company who are actively engaged in the management and operation of the Company’s restaurants to purchase the Company’s common stock at an exercise price that equals or exceeds the fair value of such shares on the date such option is granted. Vesting periods are determined at the discretion of the board of directors, and all options outstanding at January 3, 2010 vest over five years. Options may be exercised immediately upon grant, subject to a right by the Company to repurchase any unvested shares at the exercise price. Any options granted shall not be exercisable after ten years. Upon certain changes in control of the Company, the 1996 and 1997 Plans provide for two additional years of immediate vesting. The Company had reserved a total of 2,173,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the 1996 and 1997 Plans, all of which have been granted as of January 3, 2010. No awards were granted during fiscal 2009 under this plan.
 
1998 Plan
 
During 1998, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 1998 Stock Option Plan (“1998 Plan”) which provides for discretionary grants of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options to the Company’s employees, including officers, directors, consultants, advisors, and other independent contractors. The option exercise price per share for an incentive stock option and nonstatutory stock option may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant date. The Company’s Compensation Committee has the authority to, among other things, determine the vesting schedule for each option granted. Options currently outstanding generally vest over five years and all options expire within 10 years of their date of grant. A total of


64


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
3,213,770 additional shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1998 Plan of which approximately 437,000 were available to be granted as of January 3, 2010. No awards were granted during fiscal 2009 under this plan.
 
1999 Plan
 
During 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan (“1999 Plan”), which provides for discretionary grants of nonqualified stock options to the Company’s employees. The 1999 Plan prohibits grants to officers or directors. The option exercise price per share may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the grant date. The Company’s Compensation Committee has the authority to, among other things, determine the vesting schedule for each option granted. Options currently outstanding generally vest over five years and all options expire within 10 years of their date of grant. A total of 800,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 1999 Plan of which approximately 80,000 were available to be granted as of January 3, 2010. No awards were granted during fiscal 2009 under this plan.
 
2006 Plan
 
In May 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”) which provides for grants of incentive and nonstatutory stock options as well as stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, deferred compensation awards and other stock-based awards. Awards other than incentive stock options generally may be granted only to employees, directors and consultants of the Company, or certain related entities or designated affiliates. Shares subject to stock options and stock appreciation rights are charged against the 2006 Plan share reserve on the basis of one share for each one share granted while shares subject to other types of equity awards are charged against the 2006 Plan share reserve on the basis of two shares for each one share granted. The 2006 Plan also contains other limits with respect to the terms of different types of incentive awards and with respect to the number of shares subject to awards that can be granted to an employee during any fiscal year. Options currently outstanding generally vest monthly over five years and expire within 10 years of their date of grant. All other types of awards generally cliff-vest over various years. A total of 1,750,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the 2006 Plan of which approximately 319,000 were available to be granted as of January 3, 2010. Cash-settled awards are issued pursuant to the 2006 Plan, however do not decrease shares available.
 
Share-Based Compensation
 
The Company has granted stock options, cash-settled stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) and cash-settled stock-based awards (restricted cash units or “RCUs”) for a fixed number of awards with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair value of the awards at the date of grant. The Company has also granted restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with fair value determined based on the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant. The Company has also granted performance units whose value will be determined on the date of vesting. The estimated fair value of share-based compensation is amortized to expense over the vesting period.
 
Equity-Classified Awards
 
Option valuation
 
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of subjective assumptions, including estimating 1) expected term, 2) the Company’s common stock price volatility over the expected term, 3) the number of awards that will ultimately not vest (“forfeitures”) and (4) the weighted average risk-free rate of return. The Company’s outstanding options vest one-fifth after the first year and then monthly over remaining four years.


65


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The fair value for stock options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for stock option grants issued under the option plans:
 
                 
    Year Ended(1)
    December 28,
  December 30,
    2008   2007
 
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
    3.1 %     4.7 %
Expected life of options (years)
    5.5       5.5  
Expected stock volatility
    35.0 %     35.0 %
Expected dividend yield
    0.0 %     0.0 %
 
 
(1) There were no stock options granted during the year ended January 3, 2010.
 
The following table presents information regarding options granted and exercised (in thousands except weighted average fair value):
 
                         
    Year Ended
    January 3,
  December 28,
  December 30,
    2010   2008   2007
 
Weighted average fair value of stock options granted
  $     $ 11.89     $ 14.24  
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised
  $ 4,386     $ 590     $ 13,208  
Tax (shortfall) benefit from share-based compensation
  $ 1,348     $ (491 )   $ 3,981  
 
Option activity
 
Information regarding activity for stock options outstanding under the Plans is as follows:
 
                                 
    Outstanding Options  
                Weighted-
       
                Average
       
                Remaining
    Aggregate
 
          Weighted-
    Contractual
    Intrinsic
 
          Average Exercise
    Term
    Value(1)
 
    Shares     Price (per share)     (In years)     (In thousands)  
 
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006
    3,333,780     $ 35.01                  
Granted
    308,251       34.94                  
Exercised
    (439,924 )     12.78                  
Forfeited (canceled)
    (185,299 )     43.55                  
                                 
Options outstanding at December 30, 2007
    3,016,808     $ 37.72                  
Granted
    10,842       31.42                  
Exercised
    (30,732 )     9.27                  
Forfeited (canceled)
    (209,595 )     46.45                  
                                 
Options outstanding at December 28, 2008
    2,787,323     $ 37.36                  
Granted
                           
Exercised
    (240,754 )     12.04                  
Forfeited (canceled)
    (123,792 )     47.45                  
                                 
Options outstanding at January 3, 2010
    2,422,777     $ 39.36       4.5     $ 11,246  
                                 
Options exercisable at January 3, 2010
    2,140,934     $ 39.68       4.2     $ 9,984  
                                 
 
 
(1) The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options represents the closing market price on the last trading day of the quarter less the exercise price of each option multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options.


66


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
Information regarding options outstanding and exercisable at January 3, 2010 is as follows:
 
                                     
    Options Outstanding        
        Weighted-
      Options Exercisable
        Average
  Weighted-
      Weighted-
    Number
  Remaining
  Average
  Number
  Average
Range of Exercise Prices
  Outstanding   Contractual Life   Exercise Price   Exercisable   Exercise Price
 
$ 1.20 - $10.00
    9,746     3.6 years   $ 7.18       9,746     $ 7.18  
$10.01 - $15.00
    57,500     0.5 years     15.00       57,500       15.00  
$15.01 - $20.00
    219,328     1.3 years     18.76       219,328       18.76  
$20.01 - $25.00
    2,068     2.0 years     24.39       2,068       24.39  
$25.01 - $30.00
    7,738     2.7 years     29.03       7,738       29.03  
$30.01 - $35.00
    827,798     5.1 years     31.50       623,048       31.42  
$35.01 - $40.00
    110,614     5.2 years     38.44       106,780       38.50  
$40.01 - $45.00
    339,068     5.0 years     43.69       317,817       43.72  
$45.01 - $50.00
    253,975     4.0 years     46.28       241,643       46.28  
$50.01 - $59.11
    594,942     5.2 years     55.69       555,266       55.58  
 
Restricted stock activity
 
During the years ended December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007, the Company issued restricted stock and RSUs as permitted under the 2006 Plan. Both restricted stock and RSUs are charged against the 2006 Plan share reserve on the basis of two shares for each one share granted. The fair value of restricted stock and RSUs is determined based on the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant. The restricted stock awards vest and become unrestricted three years after the date of grant. RSUs (which currently have only been issued to the Board of Directors) vest and become unrestricted one year after date of grant in accordance with each Directors’ elected service term. Share-based compensation expense is recognized ratably over a three-year service period for restricted stock and over a one-year service period for RSUs.
 
Information regarding activity for restricted stock and RSUs outstanding under the 2006 Plan is as follows:
 
                 
    Restricted Stock
 
    Awards and RSUs  
          Weighted-
 
          Average
 
          Grant-Date
 
          Fair Value
 
    Shares     (per share)  
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
    96,400     $ 30.46  
Granted
    128,922       33.84  
Vested
           
Forfeited (canceled)
    (27,420 )     30.97  
                 
Outstanding at December 30, 2007
    197,902     $ 32.59  
Granted
    355,231       18.26  
Vested
           
Forfeited (canceled)
    (42,439 )     31.47  
                 
Outstanding at December 28, 2008
    510,694     $ 22.72  
Granted
           
Vested
    (60,780 )     30.61  
Forfeited (canceled)
    (31,405 )     24.81  
                 
Outstanding at January 3, 2010(1)
    418,509     $ 21.41  
                 
 
 
(1) Outstanding includes 15,426 RSUs that vested during fiscal 2009 but have yet not settled.


67


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
The fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2009 totaled approximately $2.1 million. No shares vested during fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007.
 
Liability-Classified Awards
 
Performance Units
 
During fiscal 2009, the Company awarded 600,000 performance units to each of the Company’s Co-Chief Executive Officers pursuant to the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. Each award will vest on January 1, 2012, at which time the value of such awards, if any, will be determined and paid in cash.
 
The cash value of the performance units will be equal to the amount, if any, by which the Company’s final average stock price, as defined in the agreements, exceeds the strike price. The strike price will be adjusted, either up or down, based on the percentage change in the Russell 2000 Index during the performance period, as defined in the agreements, which approximates three years. The total value of the performance units is subject to a maximum value of $12.50 per unit. If the Company’s stock appreciation is less than the Russell 2000 Index, the performance units will have no value. In the event of an executive’s involuntary separation without cause or a change in control (as both terms are defined in each Chief Executive Officer’s employment agreement) prior to the end of the performance period, the performance period will end and the maximum value per unit may be calculated at a reduced amount. Additionally, if the Company’s final average stock price declines compared to the original strike price, the total value of the performance units, if any, will be reduced by 50 percent.
 
The performance units are classified as liability awards and reported within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, as they will be cash-settled at the end of the performance period. The fair value of the performance units is remeasured at each reporting period until the awards are settled. At January 3, 2010, the fair value per performance unit was $6.54 calculated using a Monte-Carlo simulation model which incorporates the historical performance, volatility and correlation of the Company’s stock price and the Russell 2000 Index. At January 3, 2010, the recorded liability of the performance units was $2.4 million.
 
Cash-Settled Awards
 
During fiscal 2009, the Company issued cash-settled stock appreciation rights SARs and RCUs to members of its Board of Directors. The cash value of the SARs will be based on the appreciation of the Company’s stock price on the date of settlement compared to the Company’s stock price on the date of grant. The cash value of the RCUs will be based on the Company’s stock price on the date of settlement. At the election of each applicable director, the settlement date of RCUs was deferred until the earlier of the date they cease serving on the Company’s Board of Directors or a change in control of the Company. During fiscal 2009, the Company also granted RCUs to eligible employees in conjunction with its annual long-term incentive award grant.
 
Both SARs and RCUs are classified as liability awards and reported within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet, as they will be paid in cash on the settlement date. RCUs granted to eligible employees vest three years after the date of grant.
 
The fair value of the SARs and RCUs were estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
 
                 
    Year Ended(1)
    January 3, 2010
    RCUs   SARs
 
Weighted average risk-free interest rate
    1.5 %     2.4 %
Expected life of cash-settled awards (years)
    3.0       4.5  
Expected stock volatility
    51.5 %     44.3 %
Expected dividend yield
    0.0 %     0.0 %


68


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
(1) There were no liability-classified awards granted during the years ended December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007
 
The fair value of SARs is equal to the value calculated per the Black-Scholes model. The fair value of RCUs is equal to the sum of the value calculated per the Black-Scholes model and the Company’s stock price at the reporting date. The fair value of SARs and RCUs is remeasured at each reporting period until the awards are settled. At January 3, 2010, the recorded liability of cash-settled awards was $1.5 million. Share-based compensation expense for both performance units and cash-settled awards is recognized ratably over the service period with the impact of updated fair value recognized as cumulative adjustments to share-based compensation expense at the end of each reporting period.
 
Information regarding activity for RCUs and SARs outstanding under the 2006 Plan is as follows:
 
                                 
    RCUs     SARs  
          Weighted-
          Weighted-
 
          Average
          Average
 
          Grant-Date
          Grant-Date
 
          Fair Value
          Fair Value
 
    Units     (per unit)     Units     (per unit)  
 
Outstanding at December 28, 2008
        $           $  
Granted
    162,115       50.96       13,276       14.96  
Vested
                       
Forfeited (canceled)
    (4,645 )     50.46              
                                 
Outstanding at January 3, 2010
    157,470     $ 50.98       13,276     $ 14.96  
                                 
 
Share-based compensation expense
 
Share-based compensation expense from continuing operations for equity and liability-classified awards is classified as follows (in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
 
    2010     2008     2007  
 
Equity-classified awards:
                       
Labor
  $ 313     $ 529     $ 906  
General and administrative
    7,387       9,143       9,473  
Liability-classified awards:
                       
General and administrative
    3,852              
                         
Total share-based compensation
    11,552       9,672       10,379  
Less: tax benefit
    (3,431 )     (2,495 )     (2,626 )
                         
Total share-based compensation, net of tax
  $ 8,121     $ 7,177     $ 7,753  
                         
 
For the year ended December 28, 2008, share-based compensation expense includes a non-cash charge of $1.2 million related to the acceleration of the vesting of unvested options and the extension of the term of all outstanding stock options pursuant to a separation agreement with the former President of Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc. entered into in December 2008.
 
Share-based compensation presented above excludes $43,000 and $133,000 ($26,000 and $87,000 net of tax), for fiscal years ended December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007, respectively, related to discontinued operations.


69


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
There was no share-based compensation expense recorded in discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2010.
 
Non-Vested Share-Based Compensation Expense
 
At January 3, 2010, unrecognized share-based compensation, net of forfeitures (in thousands) as follows:
 
                                         
    Equity-Classified Awards     Liability-Classified Awards(1)        
          Restricted
    Performance
    RCUs and
       
    Options     Stock     Units     SARs     Total  
 
2010
  $ 2,681     $ 2,212     $ 2,723     $ 2,385     $ 10,001  
2011
    1,148       1,379       2,723       2,069       7,319  
2012
    332                   1,188       1,520  
2013
    8                         8  
                                         
Total
  $ 4,169     $ 3,591     $ 5,446     $ 5,642     $ 18,848  
                                         
 
 
(1) Liability-classified awards are based on current fair value, which is updated each reporting period.
 
The unrecognized share-based compensation expense shown above will be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period which is approximately 1.1 years for stock options, 1.4 years for restricted stock, 2.0 years for performance units and 2.5 years for RCUs and SARs awards.
 
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 
During 1998, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Purchase Plan”) and reserved 800,000 shares for issuance thereunder. The Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discount, but only through payroll deductions, during concurrent 24 month offering periods. Each offering period was originally divided into four consecutive six-month purchase periods. The price at which stock is purchased under the Purchase Plan was initially equal to 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock on the first day of the offering period and the fair market value of the common stock on the last day of the offering period. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense for its Purchase Plan, which totaled $0.2 million for the year ended December 30, 2007.
 
In August 2007, the Company modified the terms of its Purchase Plan such that the price at which stock is purchased is now equal to 95 percent of the fair market value of the common stock on the last day of the offering period. As a result of this change, the Company’s Purchase Plan is no longer considered to be compensatory and therefore, the Company ceased recognizing share-based compensation expense associated with the Purchase Plan in August 2007. In November 2009, the Company further modified the terms of its Purchase Plan such that each offering period is divided into eight consecutive three-month purchase periods.
 
Share Repurchase Program
 
Under share repurchase programs authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company has repurchased a total of 5.1 million shares of its common stock for $146.0 million at an average price of $28.83 since July 2006. Included in this total are 1.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock repurchased during 2009 for $39.7 million at an average price of $27.73. The remaining $0.4 million available under the Company’s previous share repurchase program expired in December 2009.
 
In December 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program to repurchase up to $100.0 million of its outstanding shares of common stock from time to time in the open market


70


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
or in private transactions at prevailing market prices over the next two years. The Company intends to use cash on hand to repurchase shares. The Company did not repurchase any shares under this authorization during fiscal 2009.
 
14.   Benefit Plans
 
401(k) Plan
 
Effective July 1, 1997, the Company adopted a 401(k) Defined Contribution Benefit Plan (“the Plan”). Currently, the Plan covers employees that have completed six months of service and have attained the age of 21 years old. The Plan permits participants to contribute to the Plan, subject to Internal Revenue Code restrictions, and also permits the Company to make discretionary matching contributions. Beginning July 1, 2007, the Company began bi-weekly matching contributions in amounts equal to 25% of the first 6% of employee compensation contributed, resulting in a maximum contribution of 1.5% of participating employee compensation per year (subject to annual dollar maximum limits). Company match contributions to the Plan commence after one year of service and a minimum of 1,000 hours worked. Matching contributions vest at the rate of 20% each year beginning after the employee’s first year of service. For the fiscal years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007, the Company’s matching contribution expense under the Plan was $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.3 million, respectively.
 
Restoration Plan
 
Effective July 1, 2007, the Company adopted a Restoration Plan, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan which allows officers and highly compensated employees with six months of service to defer receipt of a portion of their compensation and contribute such amounts to one or more investment funds. The maximum aggregate amount deferrable under the Restoration Plan is 75% of base salary and 100% of cash incentive compensation. The Company makes bi-weekly matching contributions in an amount equal to 25% of the first 6% of employee compensation contributed, with a maximum annual Company contribution of 1.5% of employee compensation per year (subject to annual dollar maximum limits). Company match contributions to the Restoration Plan commence after one year of service and a minimum of 1,000 hours worked. Matching contributions vest at the rate of 20% each year beginning after the employee’s first year of service. For the fiscal years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007, the Company’s matching contribution expense under the Restoration Plan was $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
 
Additionally, the Company entered into a rabbi trust agreement to protect the assets of the Restoration Plan. Each participant’s account is comprised of their contribution, the Company’s matching contribution and their share of earnings or losses in the Restoration Plan. The accounts of the rabbi trust are reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company reports these investments within other assets and the related obligation within other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Such amounts totaled $3.2 million and $1.2 million at January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, respectively. The investments are considered trading securities and are reported at fair value with the realized and unrealized holding gains and losses related to these investments, as well as the offsetting compensation expense, recorded in operating income.
 
15.   Employment Agreements
 
The Company has executed employment agreements with the following executive officers: Co-Chief Executive Officers, Executive Vice-President, and Chief Financial Officer. The term for the current agreements for the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer continues through May 28, 2011. The term for each of the Co-Chief Executive Officers continues through January 1, 2012. The agreements prohibit these officers from competing with P.F. Chang’s China Bistro and Pei Wei Asian Diner in the area of Chinese and Asian food concepts during the term of the agreements and for one year after termination. The agreements provide for immediate vesting of unvested stock options, and the extension of the expiration date to three years, after the occurrence of certain events. These events include a change in control of the Company, termination of the executive’s employment by the Company without cause or separation of employment by the executive for “good reason” (as defined in the agreements). Should any of these events occur, the


71


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Company may be required to record an expense based upon the difference between the original grant price of the options and the fair value at the modification date for the number of awards ultimately affected by the modification. As of January 3, 2010, approximately 1.1 million equity-settled awards were affected by these agreements of which approximately 0.3 million shares were unvested, and approximately 1.2 million liability-settled awards were affected by these agreements of which approximately 1.2 million awards were unvested.
 
In December 2008, the President of Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc. resigned his position with the Company and the Company entered into a separation agreement. According to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid severance compensation and accelerated the vesting of approximately 71,000 unvested stock options and extended the exercise period of all outstanding stock options. These terms resulted in the recognition of additional non-cash share-based compensation expense of $1.2 million and a cash severance payment of $0.8 million for the year ended December 28, 2008.
 
16.   Partnership Structure
 
The Company utilizes a partnership philosophy to facilitate the development, leadership and operation of its restaurants. Historically, this philosophy had been embodied in a traditional legal partnership structure, which included capital contributions from partners in exchange for an ownership stake in the profits and losses of the Company’s restaurants. Each partner was required to make a capital contribution in exchange for their percentage interest in the restaurant or region the partner managed. The ownership interest purchased by each partner generally ranged between two and ten percent of the restaurant or region the partner oversaw. At the end of a specific term (generally five years), the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase the noncontrolling interest in the partner’s respective restaurant or region at fair market value. An estimated fair value is determined by reference to current industry purchase metrics as well as the historical cash flows or net income of the subject restaurant or region, as appropriate. The Company has the option to pay the agreed upon purchase price in cash over a period of time not to exceed five years.
 
Effective January 2007 for new store openings, the Bistro began employing a different structure to achieve the same goal. At the restaurant level, the Bistro’s Operating and Culinary Partners (“partners” in the philosophical not legal sense) share in the current profitability of the restaurant as well as participate in a long-term incentive program that rewards enhancement of economic value. Due to this change in partnership structure, individuals participating in the new plan receive amounts classified as compensation expense rather than a share of noncontrolling interest. Accordingly, compensation expense for the Bistro’s Operating and Culinary Partners is reflected in the consolidated income statements as labor expense. Additionally, a similar structure exists for the Bistro’s Market Partners, Market Chefs and Regional Vice Presidents, with related compensation expense reflected as general and administrative expense in the consolidated income statements. Partner investment expense has no longer been recognized for new Bistro restaurant openings since the beginning of fiscal 2007 as a result of this change; however, for those partners who are bought out prior to the restaurant reaching maturity (typically after five years of operation), partner investment expense includes a reversal of previously recognized expense for the difference between the fair value of the partner’s interest at inception date and the fair value at the date of repurchase, to the extent that the former is greater.
 
The Pei Wei partnership structure was not affected by the changes at the Bistro and the traditional partnership structure remains in effect for new Pei Wei restaurant openings.
 
Beginning fiscal 2009 in accordance with new accounting guidance, the Company changed the accounting and reporting for minority interests, such that they have been recharacterized as noncontrolling interests. See Note 1 Recent Accounting Literature for further discussion of accounting and reporting changes.


72


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The following is a summary of partnership activity:
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Total number of partners
    40       58  
Partnership interests purchased during the year
    96       149  
Purchase price of partnership interests purchased (in thousands):
               
Cash
  $ 4,710     $ 9,763  
Debt
          2,693  
                 
Total
  $ 4,710     $ 12,456  
                 
 
17.   Income Taxes
 
Income tax expense from continuing operations consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
 
    2010     2008     2007  
 
Federal:
                       
Current
  $ 19,023     $ 4,258     $ 5,475  
Deferred
    (3,682 )     5,762       5,668  
                         
Total Federal
  $ 15,341     $ 10,020     $ 11,143  
                         
State:
                       
Current
  $ 4,166     $ 1,592     $ 1,588  
Deferred
    (1,015 )     581       (311 )
                         
Total State
  $ 3,151     $ 2,173     $ 1,277  
                         
Total income tax expense
  $ 18,492     $ 12,193     $ 12,420  
                         
 
The Company’s effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate for the following reasons:
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
 
    2010     2008     2007  
 
Income tax expense at federal statutory rate
    35.0 %     35.0 %     35.0 %
State taxes, net of federal expense
    5.8 %     4.9 %     2.6 %
Share-based compensation expense
    0.0 %     0.1 %     0.0 %
FICA tip credit
    (10.7 )%     (13.5 )%     (11.6 )%
Other, net
    (0.4 )%     (0.5 )%     (0.7 )%
                         
Total effective rate
    29.7 %     25.8 %     25.3 %
                         


73


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
The income tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
 
                 
    January 3,
    December 28,
 
    2010     2008  
 
Deferred tax assets:
               
Share-based compensation
  $ 11,560     $ 9,456  
Insurance
    5,880       2,397  
Goodwill and intangibles
    8,770       8,855  
Unearned compensation
    3,963       2,732  
Deferred rent
    4,520       4,108  
Deferred revenue
    3,960       2,908  
FICA and AMT credit carryforwards
    348       1,781  
State credit carryforwards
    1,586       1,049  
Other
    1,438       1,881  
                 
Total deferred tax assets
  $ 42,025     $ 35,167  
                 
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Depreciation on property and equipment
  $ 39,928     $ 36,976  
                 
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) before valuation allowance
  $ 2,097     $ (1,809 )
Less: valuation allowance
    (497 )     (247 )
                 
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
  $ 1,600     $ (2,056 )
                 
 
The Company currently files tax returns on a consolidated basis in some states and on a stand-alone basis in others. At January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the Company had deferred tax assets totaling $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to state net operating loss carryforwards in certain states where stand-alone tax returns are filed. These losses expire over the next five to 20 years. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance to offset the deferred tax assets for those losses that the Company does not anticipate being able to utilize prior to their expiration.
 
At January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the Company took advantage of additional tax deductions available relating to the exercise of non-qualified stock options and disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options. Accordingly, for the years ended January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the Company recorded a $1.7 million and $0.3 million, respectively, increase to equity with a corresponding reduction to income tax liability. Additionally, at January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the Company reversed $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of deferred tax assets related to fully vested cancelled options for which the Company will not receive a tax benefit. Quarterly adjustments for the exercise of non-qualified stock options and disqualifying dispositions of incentive stock options may vary as they relate to the actions of the option holder or shareholder.
 
The reserve for uncertain tax positions was $1.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively, at January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008. This balance is the Company’s best estimate of the potential liability for uncertain tax positions. The decrease in the uncertain tax position reserve was primarily due to audit assessments that settled during 2009. This decrease was partially offset by increases to the reserve relating to current year requirements for asserted and unasserted items, as well as preliminary audit assessments. Inherent uncertainties exist in estimates of tax contingencies due to changes in tax law, both legislated and concluded through the various jurisdictions’ tax court systems.


74


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Changes in the Company’s reserve for uncertain tax positions are as follows (in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    January 3,
    December 28,
    December 30,
 
    2010     2008     2007  
 
Beginning balance
  $ 1,259     $ 1,175     $ 1,411  
Increases (decreases) attributable to tax positions taken during prior periods
    261       66       (94 )
Increases attributable to tax positions taken during the current period
    98       187       155  
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities
    (402 )     (106 )     (104 )
Decreases resulting from a lapse of applicable statutes of limitations
          (63 )     (193 )
                         
Ending balance
  $ 1,216     $ 1,259     $ 1,175  
                         
 
As of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the Company had accrued $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of interest related to uncertain tax positions. For the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007, provision for income tax includes a $0.1 million expense, a $0.02 million expense, and a $0.3 million benefit, respectively, related to interest expense on uncertain tax positions. As of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, the Company had accrued $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively of penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
 
Currently, the Company has statutes of limitations open in various states ranging from the 1999 through 2008 tax years. The federal statute of limitations is currently open for the 2004 through 2008 tax years.
 
18.   Commitments and Contingencies
 
Purchase Obligations
 
The Company enters into various purchase obligations in the ordinary course of its business. Those that are binding relate primarily to commodities contracts and construction for restaurants planned to open in the near future. At January 3, 2010, such purchase obligations approximated $116.1 million and were due within the following 12-month period.
 
Litigation and other
 
The Company is engaged in various legal actions, which arise in the ordinary course of its business. The Company is also currently under examination by various taxing authorities for years not closed by the statute of limitations. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these matters, it is the opinion of the Company’s management, based upon the information available at this time, that the outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial condition of the Company.
 
Loan Facility
 
In August 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with FRC Balance LLC, d/b/a True Food Kitchen, to provide debt capital for the early-stage development of True Food Kitchen restaurants. The agreement provides for up to a $10.0 million loan facility to develop True Food Kitchen restaurants and can, under certain conditions, be converted by P.F. Chang’s into a majority equity position in True Food Kitchen. As of January 3, 2010, no borrowings were outstanding under the loan facility.


75


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Management has evaluated both quantitative and qualitative factors regarding the terms of the agreement with FRC Balance LLC, including, but not limited to, voting rights, obligations to absorb expected losses and rights to receive expected residual returns. Based on this assessment, management has determined that the entity does not need to be consolidated within the Company’s financial statements.
 
19.   Segment Reporting
 
The Company operates primarily in the United States food-service industry and has determined that its reportable segments are those that are based on the Company’s methods of internal reporting and management structure. The Company’s reportable segments are Bistro and Pei Wei. There were no material amounts of revenues or transfers among reportable segments.
 
The following table presents information about reportable segments (in thousands):
 
                                 
        Shared Services
       
    Total   and Other   Bistro   Pei Wei
 
Fiscal Year 2009
                               
Revenues
  $ 1,228,179     $ 134     $ 925,321     $ 302,724  
Segment profit
    149,844       (1,671 )     123,602       27,913  
Capital expenditures
    49,865       2,748       36,180       10,937  
Depreciation and amortization
    74,429       1,805       54,521       18,103  
Total assets
    652,150       20,293       522,940       108,917  
Goodwill
    6,819             6,566       253  
Fiscal Year 2008
                               
Revenues
  $ 1,198,124     $     $ 919,963     $ 278,161  
Segment profit
    136,163       (1,462 )     115,880       21,745  
Capital expenditures
    87,178       2,450       65,546       19,182  
Depreciation and amortization
    68,711       1,462       51,091       16,158  
Total assets
    667,363       20,478       534,224       112,661  
Goodwill
    6,819             6,566       253  
Fiscal Year 2007
                               
Revenues
  $ 1,084,193     $     $ 849,743     $ 234,450  
Segment profit
    128,409       (1,416 )     109,679       20,146  
Capital expenditures
    151,553       157       111,248       40,148  
Depreciation and amortization
    55,988       1,416       42,294       12,278  
 
In addition to using consolidated GAAP results in evaluating the Company’s financial results, a primary measure used by executive management in assessing the performance of existing restaurant concepts is segment profitability (sometimes referred to as restaurant operating income). Segment profitability is defined as income from operations before general and administrative, preopening and partner investment expenses, but including a deduction for net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Because preopening and partner investment expenses are associated with expansion of the Company’s business and vary in timing and magnitude, they make an accurate assessment of ongoing operations more difficult and are therefore excluded. Additionally, general and administrative expenses are only included in the Company’s consolidated financial results as these costs relate to support of both restaurant businesses and are generally not specifically identifiable to individual restaurant operations. As the Company’s expansion is funded entirely from its ongoing restaurant operations, segment profitability is one consideration when determining whether and when to open additional restaurants.


76


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Information to GAAP measures (in thousands):
 
                         
    Fiscal Year  
    2009     2008     2007  
 
Segment profit
  $ 149,844     $ 136,163     $ 128,409  
Less: General and administrative
    (82,749 )     (77,488 )     (66,968 )
Less: Preopening expense
    (3,919 )     (8,457 )     (14,310 )
Less: Partner investment expense
    629       354       2,012  
Less: Interest & other income (expense), net
    (1,637 )     (3,362 )     (100 )
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
    1,408       1,933       4,169  
                         
Income from continuing operations before taxes
  $ 63,576     $ 49,143     $ 53,212  
                         
 
20.   Interim Financial Results (Unaudited)
 
The following tables set forth certain unaudited consolidated financial information for each of the four quarters in fiscal 2009 and 2008 (in thousands, except per share data).
 
                                                                 
    Fiscal 2009     Fiscal 2008  
    First
    Second
    Third
    Fourth
    First
    Second
    Third
    Fourth
 
    Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter     Quarter  
 
Revenues
  $ 309,837     $ 301,360     $ 290,329     $ 326,653     $ 305,917     $ 301,533     $ 295,877     $ 294,797  
Income from continuing operations(1)
    13,392       12,079       6,225       11,980       9,978       9,895       7,655       7,489  
Net income(2)
    13,349       11,605       6,208       12,035       9,649       9,370       2,962       5,445  
Basic income from continuing operations per share
    0.57       0.52       0.27       0.53       0.42       0.41       0.33       0.32  
Basic net income per share
    0.57       0.50       0.27       0.53       0.40       0.39       0.13       0.23  
Diluted income from continuing operations per share
    0.56       0.51       0.27       0.52       0.41       0.41       0.32       0.31  
Diluted net income per share
    0.56       0.49       0.27       0.52       0.40       0.39       0.12       0.23  
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    23,442       23,057       22,810       22,633       23,972       23,898       23,613       23,623  
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    23,795       23,526       23,285       23,045       24,295       24,247       23,927       23,851  
 
 
(1) Income from continuing operations refers to income from continuing operations, net of tax, attributable to PFCB common stockholders.
 
(2) Net income refers to Net income attributable to PFCB common stockholders.
 
In management’s opinion, the unaudited quarterly information shown above has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and includes all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited quarterly results when read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes. The Company believes that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of its financial results are not necessarily indicative of future performance.


77


Table of Contents

 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
 
 
21.   Subsequent Events
 
Cash Dividends
 
During February 2010, the Board of Directors approved the initiation of a quarterly variable cash dividend based on the Company’s desire to consistently return excess cash flow to its shareholders. The amount of the cash dividend will be computed based on 45% of the Company’s quarterly net income and is expected to total approximately $0.90 per share during fiscal 2010. Based on seasonal fluctuations in the Company’s quarterly net income, the amount of cash dividend payments, which are based on a fixed percentage of net income, may fluctuate between quarters.
 
Global Brand Development
 
During February 2010, the Company signed a development and licensing agreement with Global Restaurant Concepts, Inc., a leading casual dining operator in the Philippines, to develop eight restaurants over the next five years. The first restaurant is scheduled to open in Manila during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.


78


Table of Contents

Item 9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
None.
 
Item 9A.   Controls and Procedures
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures — We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Co-Chief Executive Officers (“Co-CEOs”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as the Company’s controls are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the risk related to controls and procedures.
 
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as of January 3, 2010, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Co-CEOs and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, our Co-CEOs and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of January 3, 2010. These conclusions were communicated to the Audit Committee.
 
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting — Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
 
Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2010. In making its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, our Co-CEOs and CFO concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of January 3, 2010 based on the criteria set forth by COSO in Internal Control — Integrated Framework.
 
Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This report appears below.
 
Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting — There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
Item 9B.   Other Information
 
None.


79


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc.:
 
We have audited P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company’s) internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2010 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 3, 2010 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, issued by COSO.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of P.F. Chang’s China Bistro, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, equity, and cash flows for the years ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007, and our report dated February 17, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
 
(signed) KPMG LLP
 
Phoenix, Arizona
February 17, 2010


80


Table of Contents

 
PART III
 
Item 10.   Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
The information required by Item 10 with respect to Directors and Executive Officers is incorporated by reference from the information under the captions “Directors and Executive Officers,” “Board Meetings and Committees,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Code of Ethics,” contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 22, 2010 (the “Proxy Statement”).
 
Item 11.   Executive Compensation
 
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Executive Compensation and Other Matters” contained in the Proxy Statement.
 
Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference from information under the captions “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” contained in the Proxy Statement.
 
Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
 
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” contained in the Proxy Statement.
 
Item 14.   Principal Accounting Fees and Services
 
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference from the information under the caption “Independent Auditors Fees and Other Matters,” contained in the Proxy Statement.
 
PART IV
 
Item 15.   Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
 
Documents filed as part of this report:
 
1. The following Financial Statements of the Company are included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm;
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 3, 2010 and December 28, 2008;
 
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007;
 
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007;
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended January 3, 2010, December 28, 2008, and December 30, 2007;
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
2. Schedules to Financial Statements:
 
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are either inapplicable or the information required is provided in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


81


Table of Contents

 
3. Index to Exhibits
 
         
Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description Document
 
    3(i)(1)     Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
       3(ii)(2)     Amended and Restated By-laws.
  4 .1(3)   Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
  4 .2(3)   Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated May 1, 1997.
  †10 .1(3)   Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive officers.
  †10 .2(3)   1998 Stock Option Plan and forms of agreement thereunder.
  †10 .3(3)   1997 Restaurant Manager Stock Option Plan and forms of Agreement thereunder.
  †10 .4(3)   1996 Stock Option Plan and forms of Agreement thereunder.
  †10 .5   Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective November 1, 2009.
  †10 .13(4)   1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.
  10 .16(5)   Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 11, 2001.
  †10 .17(6)   Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan.
  †10 .23(7)   Key Employee Stock Purchase Plan and forms of Agreement thereunder.
  †10 .25(8)   2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
  †10 .26(8)   Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan.
  10 .27(9)   2007 Credit Agreement dated August 31, 2007.
  †10 .28(10)(11)   Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Richard L. Federico, as amended, dated May 21, 2008. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 18, 2009.
  †10 .29(10)(11)   Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert T. Vivian, as amended, dated May 21, 2008. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 18, 2009.
  †10 .30(10)   Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Russell Owens, as amended, dated May 21, 2008.
  †10 .31(10)   Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and R. Michael Welborn, as amended, dated May 21, 2008.
  †10 .32(10)   Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Mark Mumford, as amended, dated May 21, 2008.
  †10 .33   Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, effective April 22, 2010.
  †10 .34(14)   Separation Agreement between the Company and Russell Owens, dated December 18, 2008.
  10 .35(12)   First Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated December 31, 2008.
  10 .36(12)   Second Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated June 23, 2009.
  10 .37(13)   Third Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated December 15, 2009.
  21 .1   List of Subsidiaries.
  23 .1   Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
  31 .1   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Richard L. Federico.
  31 .2   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Robert T. Vivian.
  31 .3   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark D. Mumford.
  32 .1   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Richard L. Federico.
  32 .2   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Robert T. Vivian.
  32 .3   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark D. Mumford.
 
 
Management Contract or Compensatory Plan.
 
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated April 25, 2002.
 
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2007.
 
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-59749).


82


Table of Contents

 
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 6, 2001.
 
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q, dated April 1, 2001.
 
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 19, 2002.
 
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-8 dated January 31, 2005.
 
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated May 4, 2006.
 
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q, dated October 26, 2007.
 
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 23, 2008.
 
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2009.
 
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 22, 2009.
 
(13) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2009.
 
(14) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed on February , 2009.


83


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 17, 2010.
 
P.F. CHANG’S CHINA BISTRO, INC.
 
  By: 
/s/  RICHARD L. FEDERICO
Richard L. Federico
Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer
 
  By: 
/s/  ROBERT T. VIVIAN
Robert T. Vivian
Co-Chief Executive Officer
 
  By: 
/s/  MARK D. MUMFORD
Mark D. Mumford
Chief Financial Officer
 
POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
Know all persons by these presents, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Richard L. Federico, Robert T. Vivian and Mark D. Mumford, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place, and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming that all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their substitute or substituted, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
 
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
             
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
             
By:
 
/s/  KERRII ANDERSON

Kerrii Anderson
  Director   February 17, 2010
             
By:
 
/s/  RICHARD L. FEDERICO

Richard L. Federico
  Chairman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
  February 17, 2010
             
By:
 
/s/  LESLEY H. HOWE

Lesley H. HOWE
  Director   February 17, 2010
             
By:
 
/s/  KENNETH A. MAY

Kenneth A. May
  Director   February 17, 2010


84


Table of Contents

             
Signature
 
Title
 
Date
 
             
By:
 
/s/  MARK D. MUMFORD

Mark D. Mumford
  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)   February 17, 2010
             
By:
 
/s/  M. ANN RHOADES

M. Ann Rhoades
  Director   February 17, 2010
             
By:
 
/s/  JAMES G. SHENNAN, JR. 

James G. Shennan, Jr. 
  Director   February 17, 2010
             
By:
 
/s/  ROBERT T. VIVIAN

Robert T. Vivian
  Co-Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)   February 17, 2010
             
By:
 
/s/  R. MICHAEL WELBORN

R. Michael Welborn
  Executive Vice President and Director   February 17, 2010
             
By:
 
/s/  KENNETH J. WESSELS

Kenneth J. Wessels
  Director   February 17, 2010


85


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
 
         
Exhibit
   
Number
 
Description Document
 
    3(i)(1)     Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
       3(ii)(2)     Amended and Restated By-laws.
  4 .1(3)   Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
  4 .2(3)   Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated May 1, 1997.
  †10 .1(3)   Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and executive officers.
  †10 .2(3)   1998 Stock Option Plan and forms of agreement thereunder.
  †10 .3(3)   1997 Restaurant Manager Stock Option Plan and forms of Agreement thereunder.
  †10 .4(3)   1996 Stock Option Plan and forms of Agreement thereunder.
  †10 .5   Amended and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, effective November 1, 2009.
  †10 .13(4)   1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan.
  10 .16(5)   Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 11, 2001.
  †10 .17(6)   Pei Wei Asian Diner, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan.
  †10 .23(7)   Key Employee Stock Purchase Plan and forms of Agreement thereunder.
  †10 .25(8)   2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
  †10 .26(8)   Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Option Plan.
  10 .27(9)   2007 Credit Agreement dated August 31, 2007.
  †10 .28(10)(11)   Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Richard L. Federico, as amended, dated May 21, 2008. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 18, 2009.
  †10 .29(10)(11)   Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert T. Vivian, as amended, dated May 21, 2008. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 18, 2009.
  †10 .30(10)   Employment Agreement between the Company and Russell Owens, as amended, dated May 21, 2008.
  †10 .31(10)   Employment Agreement between the Company and R. Michael Welborn, as amended, dated May 21, 2008.
  †10 .32(10)   Employment Agreement between the Company and Mark Mumford, as amended, dated May 21, 2008.
  †10 .33   Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, effective April 22, 2010.
  †10 .34   Separation Agreement between the Company and Russell Owens, dated December 18, 2008.
  10 .35(12)   First Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated December 31, 2008.
  10 .36(12)   Second Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated June 23, 2009.
  10 .37(13)   Third Amendment to 2007 Credit Agreement dated December 15, 2009.
  21 .1   List of Subsidiaries.
  23 .1   Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
  31 .1   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Richard L. Federico.
  31 .2   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Robert T. Vivian.
  31 .3   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark D Mumford.
  32 .1   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Richard L. Federico.
  32 .2   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Robert T. Vivian.
  32 .3   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Mark D Mumford.
 
 
Management Contract or Compensatory Plan.
 
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated April 25, 2002.
 
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on October 25, 2007.
 
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-59749).
 
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 6, 2001.


86


Table of Contents

 
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q, dated April 1, 2001.
 
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 19, 2002.
 
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-8 dated January 31, 2005.
 
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K dated May 4, 2006.
 
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 10-Q, dated October 26, 2007.
 
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 23, 2008.
 
(11) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2009.
 
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 22, 2009.
 
(13) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on December 17, 2009.


87