Attached files

file filename
EX-12.1 - EXHIBIT 12.1 - RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPexhibit_12-1.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - 906 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPexhibit_32-1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - 906 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPexhibit_32-2.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - 302 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPexhibit_31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - 302 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPexhibit_31-2.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
(Mark One)
x  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009
 
OR
 
[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission File Number 1-9961
 
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
95-3775816
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
19001 S. Western Avenue
Torrance, California
(Address of principal executive offices)
90501
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:       (310) 468-1310
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes   x   No  __                                

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes  __             No    __                    

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer   __                                                                                                           Accelerated filer   __
 
Non-accelerated filer    x                                                                                                           Smaller reporting company  __

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 
Yes __    No  x

As of January 31, 2010, the number of outstanding shares of capital stock, par value $10,000 per share, of the registrant was 91,500, all of which shares were held by Toyota Financial Services Americas Corporation.

Reduced Disclosure Format
The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure format.

 
 

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended December 31, 2009


INDEX
   
Part I
 
3
Item 1
Financial Statements
3
 
Consolidated Statement of Income
3
 
Consolidated Balance Sheet
4
 
Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Equity
5
 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
6
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Item 2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
47
Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
74
Item 4T
Controls and Procedures
74
Part II
 
75
Item 1
Legal Proceedings
75
Item 1A
Risk Factors
76
Item 2
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
76
Item 3
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
76
Item 4
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
76
Item 5
Other Information
76
Item 6
Exhibits
76
 
Signatures
77
 
Exhibit Index
78

 
 
- 2 -

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)

 
Three months ended
December 31,
 
Nine months ended
December 31,
 
2009
 
2008
 
2009
 
2008
Financing revenues:
             
Operating lease
$1,179
 
$1,257
 
$3,550
 
$3,688
Retail financing
778
 
847
 
2,349
 
2,510
Dealer financing
80
 
157
 
251
 
450
Total financing revenues
2,037
 
2,261
 
6,150
 
6,648
               
Depreciation on operating leases
897
 
1,078
 
2,626
 
3,103
Interest expense
438
 
1,830
 
1,555
 
2,514
Net financing revenues
702
 
(647)
 
1,969
 
1,031
               
Insurance earned premiums and contract revenues
112
 
104
 
336
 
314
Investment and other income
66
 
111
 
171
 
182
Net financing revenues and other revenues
880
 
(432)
 
2,476
 
1,527
               
Expenses:
             
Provision for credit losses
(5)
 
670
 
334
 
1,397
Operating and administrative
192
 
195
 
543
 
613
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
51
 
42
 
164
 
143
Total expenses
238
 
907
 
1,041
 
2,153
               
Income (loss) before income taxes
642
 
(1,339)
 
1,435
 
(626)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
248
 
(527)
 
555
 
(251)
               
Net income (loss)
$394
 
($812)
 
$880
 
($375)
               
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
       



 
- 3 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)

 
December 31,
2009
 
March 31,
2009
ASSETS
     
       
Cash and cash equivalents
$4,760
 
$6,298
Investments in marketable securities
2,618
 
2,187
Finance receivables, net
54,459
 
54,574
Investments in operating leases, net
16,971
 
17,980
Other assets
2,306
 
2,640
Total assets
$81,114
 
$83,679
       
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
     
       
Debt
$69,178
 
$72,983
Deferred income taxes
3,230
 
2,454
Other liabilities
3,598
 
4,149
Total liabilities
76,006
 
79,586
       
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 12)
     
       
Shareholder's equity:
     
Capital stock, $10,000 par value (100,000 shares authorized;
     
91,500 issued and outstanding)
915
 
915
Additional paid-in-capital
1
 
1
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
72
 
(63)
Retained earnings
4,120
 
3,240
Total shareholder's equity
5,108
 
4,093
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity
$81,114
 
$83,679
       
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
     


 
- 4 -

 

 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)

 
Capital stock
 
Additional paid-in capital
 
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
 
Retained earnings
 
Total
                   
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2008
$915
 
$-
 
$-
 
$3,865
 
$4,780
                   
Effects of accounting change for retirement benefits
-
 
-
 
-
 
(2)
 
(2)
                   
Stock-based compensation
-
 
1
 
-
 
-
 
1
                   
Comprehensive loss activity:
                 
Net loss for the nine months ended December 31, 2008
-
 
-
 
-
 
(375)
 
(375)
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of tax benefit of $95 million
-
 
-
 
(158)
 
-
 
(158)
 
Reclassification adjustment for net loss included in net income, net of tax benefit of $1 million
-
 
-
 
2
 
-
 
2
Total comprehensive loss
-
 
-
 
(156)
 
(375)
 
(531)
                   
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
$915
 
$1
 
($156)
 
$3,488
 
$4,248
                   
                   
BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2009
$915
 
$1
 
($63)
 
$3,240
 
$4,093
                   
Net income for the nine months ended
December 31, 2009
-
 
-
 
-
 
880
 
880
 
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of tax provision of $78 million
-
 
-
 
127
 
-
 
127
 
Reclassification adjustment for net loss included in net income, net of tax benefit of $5 million
-
 
-
 
8
 
-
 
8
Total comprehensive income
-
 
-
 
135
 
880
 
1,015
                   
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009
$915
 
$1
 
$72
 
$4,120
 
$5,108
                   
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
   



 
- 5 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
(Unaudited)
 
         Nine months ended December 31,
 
2009
 
2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
     
Net income (loss)
$880
 
($375)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
     
Depreciation and amortization
2,714
 
3,209
Recognition of deferred income
(758)
 
(755)
Provision for credit losses
334
 
1,397
Amortization of deferred origination fees
248
 
245
Fair value adjustments and amortization of premiums and
     discounts associated with debt, net
3,480
 
(2,746)
Net (gain) loss from sale of marketable securities
(7)
 
16
Impairment on marketable securities
7
 
7
Net change in:
     
Derivative assets
(629)
 
1,031
Other assets
(142)
 
(201)
Deferred income taxes
693
 
(414)
Derivative liabilities
(945)
 
480
Other liabilities
419
 
(227)
Net cash provided by operating activities
6,294
 
1,667
Cash flows from investing activities:
     
Purchase of investments in marketable securities
(880)
 
(1,567)
Disposition of investments in marketable securities
671
 
1,224
Acquisition of finance receivables
(15,954)
 
(19,830)
Collection of finance receivables
15,098
 
15,613
Net change in wholesale receivables
799
 
218
Acquisition of investments in operating leases
(5,009)
 
(6,468)
Disposals of investments in operating leases
3,641
 
3,046
Advances to affiliates
(1,731)
 
(5,199)
Repayments from affiliates
2,835
 
4,772
Other, net
(15)
 
-
Net cash used in investing activities
(545)
 
(8,191)
Cash flows from financing activities:
     
Proceeds from issuance of debt
5,424
 
12,843
Payments on debt
(13,831)
 
(12,737)
Net change in commercial paper
(853)
 
8,450
Net advances to TFSA (Note 14)
-
 
(27)
Advances from affiliates (Note 14)
2,001
 
-
Repayments to affiliates (Note 14)
(28)
 
1,679
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(7,287)
 
10,208
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(1,538)
 
3,684
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
6,298
 
736
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
$4,760
 
$4,420
Supplemental disclosures:
     
Interest paid
$1,636
 
$2,069
Income taxes (paid) received
($9)
 
$22
Non-cash financing:
     
Capital contribution for stock-based compensation
$-
 
$1

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

 
- 6 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Interim Financial Data

Basis of Presentation

The information furnished in these unaudited interim financial statements for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).  In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial information reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  The results of operations for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the full year.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, significant accounting policies, and other notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (“fiscal 2009”), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 16, 2009.  References herein to “TMCC” denote Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, and references herein to “we”, “our”, and “us” denote Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

In preparing these financial statements, we have evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through February 5, 2010, the date the financial statements were issued.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Investments in Marketable Securities

Investments in marketable securities consist of debt and equity securities.  Debt and equity securities designated as available-for-sale (“AFS”) are carried at fair value using quoted market prices where available with unrealized gains or losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.  We use the specific identification method to determine realized gains and losses related to our investment portfolio.  Realized investment gains and losses are reflected in Investment and Other Income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

We periodically evaluate unrealized losses on our AFS debt securities portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment.  If we have no intent to sell and we believe that it is more likely than not we will not be required to sell these securities prior to recovery, the credit loss component of the unrealized losses are recognized in earnings, while the remainder of the loss is recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”). The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected using a credit cash flow analysis for debt securities.

We perform periodic reviews of our AFS equity securities to determine whether unrealized losses are temporary in nature.  If losses are considered to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to fair value and the write down is reflected in Investment and Other Income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

 
- 7 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Interim Financial Data (Continued)

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

New Accounting Guidance

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the fair value measurements and disclosure guidance to provide increased disclosures about transfers of financial assets in and out of Levels 1 and 2.  The new disclosure is effective for us March 31, 2010.  Additionally, all activity in Level 3 must be presented separately.  This disclosure is effective for us March 31, 2011.  We do not expect these disclosures to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In October 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that sets forth the requirements that must be met for a company to recognize revenue from the sale of a delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement when other items have not yet been delivered. This accounting guidance is effective for us on April 1, 2011 and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In October 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality. The accounting guidance more closely reflects the underlying economics of these transactions. This accounting guidance is effective for us on April 1, 2011 and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires entities to provide greater transparency about transfers of financial assets and a company’s continuing involvement in those transferred financial assets. The accounting guidance also removes the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. This accounting guidance is effective for us beginning April 1, 2010 and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which changes the existing consolidation model for variable interest entities to a new model based on a qualitative assessment of power and economics. This accounting guidance is effective for us beginning April 1, 2010 and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In January 2010, the FASB issued accounting guidance that addresses the accounting and reporting for an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership of a subsidiary, including the deconsolidation of a subsidiary and the exchange of assets for an equity interest in another entity.  This accounting guidance was effective for us upon issuance, and its adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In August 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which provided clarification that, in the absence of a quoted price for a liability, companies may apply methods that use the quoted price of an investment traded as an asset or other valuation techniques consistent with the fair-value measurement principle. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

 
- 8 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Interim Financial Data (Continued)

In June 2009, the FASB issued The Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative accounting guidance for public companies. The Codification did not change generally accepted accounting principles but rather enhanced the way accounting principles are organized. The Codification was effective for us July 1, 2009 and its adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In May 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance on subsequent events which requires companies to address the accounting and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires all companies to report noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements and to account for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling owners as equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling interest in the subsidiary. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance requiring disclosure about the method and significant assumptions used to establish the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as annual statements. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2009, the FASB issued additional accounting guidance for other-than-temporary impairments to improve the consistency in the timing of impairment recognition, as well as provide greater clarity to investors about credit and non-credit components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In April 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which primarily addressed the measurement of fair value of financial assets and liabilities when there is no active market or where the price inputs being used could be indicative of distressed sales. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

 
- 9 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurement – Definition and Hierarchy

The accounting guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  This accounting guidance also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available.  Fair value should be based on assumptions that market participants would use, including a consideration of nonperformance risk.  The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1:  Quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.  Examples of assets currently utilizing Level 1 inputs are most U.S. government securities, actively exchange-traded equity mutual funds, and money market funds.

Level 2:  Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.  Examples of assets and liabilities currently utilizing Level 2 inputs are U.S. government agency securities, corporate bonds, most mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, private placement investments in fixed income mutual funds, and most over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives.

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity may require significant judgment in order to determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities.  Examples of assets and liabilities currently utilizing Level 3 inputs are structured OTC derivatives and certain mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.

The use of observable and unobservable inputs is reflected in the fair value hierarchy assessment disclosed in the tables within this section.  The availability of observable inputs can vary based upon the financial instrument and other factors, such as instrument type, market liquidity and other specific characteristics particular to the financial instrument.  To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires additional judgment by management. The degree of management’s judgment can result in financial instruments being classified as or transferred to the Level 3 category.

Controls over Valuation of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

We have internal controls to ensure the appropriateness of fair value measurements including validation processes, review of key model inputs, and reconciliation of period-over-period fluctuations based on changes in key market inputs.  All fair value measurements are subject to analysis.  Review and approval by management is required as part of the validation processes.

 
- 10 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Fair Value Methods

Fair value is based on quoted market prices, if available.  If listed prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use as inputs market-based or independently sourced market parameters.  We use prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market dislocation.  In periods of market dislocation, the availability of prices and inputs may be reduced for certain financial instruments.  This condition could result in a financial instrument being reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level 3.

Valuation Adjustments

Counterparty Credit Valuation Adjustments – Adjustments are required when the market price (or parameter) is not indicative of the credit quality of the counterparty.

Non-Performance Credit Valuation Adjustments – Adjustments reflect our own non-performance risk when our liabilities are measured at fair value.

Liquidity Valuation Adjustments – Adjustments are necessary when we are unable to observe prices for a financial instrument due to market illiquidity.

Valuation Methods

The following section describes the valuation methodologies used for financial instruments measured at fair value, key inputs and significant assumptions in addition to the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents, consisting of money market instruments, represent highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at purchase.  Generally, quoted market prices are used to determine the fair value of money market instruments.

Marketable Securities

The marketable securities portfolio consists of debt and equity securities.  Where available, we use quoted market prices to measure fair value for these financial instruments.  If quoted prices are not available, prices for similar assets and matrix pricing models are used.  Some securities may have limited transparency or less observability; in these situations, fair value may be estimated using various assumptions such as default rates, loss severity and credit ratings.

Derivatives

As part of our risk management strategy, we enter into derivative transactions to mitigate our interest rate and foreign currency exposures.  These derivative transactions are considered over-the-counter.  All of our derivatives counterparties to which we had credit exposure at December 31, 2009 were assigned investment grade ratings by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”).

 
- 11 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

We estimate the fair value of our derivatives using industry standard valuation models that require observable market inputs, including market prices, yield curves, credit curves, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, volatilities and the contractual terms of the derivative instruments.  For derivatives that trade in liquid markets, such as interest rate swaps, model inputs can generally be verified and do not require significant management judgment.

Certain other derivative transactions trade in less liquid markets with limited pricing information.  For such derivatives, key inputs to the valuation process include quotes from counterparties, and other market data used to corroborate and adjust values where appropriate.  Other market data includes values obtained from a market participant that serves as a third party pricing agent.  In addition, pricing is validated internally using valuation models to assess the reasonableness of changes in factors such as market prices, yield curves, credit curves, interest rates, foreign exchange rates and volatilities.

Our derivative fair value measurements consider assumptions about counterparty credit risk and our own non-performance risk.  Generally, we assume that a valuation that uses the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) curve to convert future values to present value is appropriate for derivative assets and liabilities.  We consider counterparty credit risk and our own non-performance risk through credit valuation adjustments.  In situations in which our net position with a derivative counterparty is an asset, the credit valuation adjustment calculation uses the credit default probabilities of our derivative counterparties over a particular time period.  In situations in which our net position with a derivative counterparty is a liability, we use our own credit default probability to calculate the required non-performance credit valuation adjustment.  We use a relative fair value approach to allocate the credit valuation adjustments to our derivatives portfolio.

As of December 31, 2009, we reduced our derivative liabilities in the amount of $4 million to account for our own non-performance risk.  Derivative assets were reduced $15 million to account for counterparty credit risk.

Finance Receivables

Our finance receivables are not carried at fair value on a recurring basis on the balance sheet, nor are they actively traded.  In certain instances, for finance receivables where there is evidence of impairment we may use an observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  The fair values of impaired finance receivables based on the collateral value or market prices where available are reported at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  Additional adjustments may be considered to reflect current market conditions when estimating fair value.

Other Assets

Other assets consist in part, of a net receivable from a money market mutual fund, which was adversely affected by the liquidity crisis in the marketplace during fiscal 2009.  Since the net asset value of the money market mutual fund was no longer publicly available, we used net present value techniques adjusted for credit and liquidity risks and reported this in other assets.  On March 31, 2009, we considered the money market mutual fund impaired and recorded a $35 million impairment.  The net realizable value of $26 million was subsequently collected during the nine months ended December 31, 2009.

 
- 12 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of December 31, 2009, by level within the fair value hierarchy (dollars in millions):

 
Fair value measurements on a recurring basis
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
Counterparty
netting &
collateral 1
Fair
value
           
Cash equivalents
$4,508
$-
$-
$-
$4,508
Available-for-sale securities:
         
Debt instruments:
         
U.S. government and agency obligations
30
25
-
-
55
Municipal debt securities
-
11
-
-
11
Foreign government debt securities
-
22
-
-
22
Corporate debt securities
-
85
-
-
85
Mortgage-backed securities:
         
Agency mortgage-backed securities
-
117
-
-
117
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
-
18
-
-
18
Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities
-
25
-
-
25
Asset-backed securities
-
701
-
-
701
Equity instruments:
         
Fixed income mutual funds
-
1,243
-
-
1,243
Equity mutual funds
341
-
-
-
341
Available-for-sale securities total
371
2,247
-
-
2,618
Derivatives:
         
Derivative assets2
-
4,294
179
(3,675)
798
Embedded derivative assets
-
-
6
-
6
Derivatives total
-
4,294
185
(3,675)
804
Total assets 3
4,879
6,541
185
(3,675)
7,930
           
Derivative liabilities2
-
(1,397)
(111)
1,147
(361)
Embedded derivative liabilities
-
-
(36)
-
(36)
Total liabilities 3
-
(1,397)
(147)
1,147
(397)
Total net assets and liabilities
$4,879
$5,144
$38
($2,528)
$7,533

 
1   We have met the accounting guidance for setoff criteria and have elected to net derivative assets and derivative liabilities and the related
     cash collateral received and paid when legally enforceable master netting agreements exist.
 
2   Includes derivative asset counterparty credit valuation adjustment of $15 million and derivative liability non-performance credit valuation
     adjustment of $4 million.  Derivative assets and derivative liabilities include interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps, foreign currency
     forwards, and interest rate caps.
 
   Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
      measurement.


 
- 13 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of March 31, 2009, by level within the fair value hierarchy (dollars in millions):

 
Fair value measurements on a recurring basis
 
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
Counterparty  
netting,
collateral 1
Fair value
Cash equivalents
$6,129
$-
$-
$-
$6,129
Available-for-sale securities:
         
Debt instruments:
         
U.S. government and agency obligations
44
27
-
-
71
Municipal debt securities
-
3
-
-
3
Foreign government debt securities
-
-
-
-
-
Corporate debt securities
-
63
-
-
63
Mortgage-backed securities:
         
Agency mortgage-backed securities
-
114
-
-
114
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
-
37
-
-
37
Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities
-
32
-
-
32
Asset-backed securities
-
376
-
-
376
Equity instruments:
         
Preferred stock
1
-
-
-
1
Fixed income mutual funds
-
1,250
-
-
1,250
Equity mutual funds
240
-
-
-
240
Available-for-sale securities total
285
1,902
-
-
2,187
Derivatives:
         
Derivative assets2
-
2,020
159
(2,028)
151
Embedded derivative assets
-
-
24
-
24
Derivatives total
-
2,020
183
(2,028)
175
Total assets 3
6,414
3,922
183
(2,028)
8,491
           
Derivative liabilities2
-
(2,909)
(216)
1,808
(1,317)
Embedded derivative liabilities
-
-
(25)
-
(25)
Total liabilities 3
-
(2,909)
(241)
1,808
(1,342)
Total net assets and liabilities
$6,414
$1,013
($58)
($220)
$7,149

 
1  We have met the accounting guidance setoff criteria and have elected to net derivative assets and derivative liabilities and the related cash
    collateral received and paid when legally enforceable master netting agreements exist.
 
2   Includes derivative asset counterparty credit valuation adjustment of $18 million and derivative liability non-performance credit valuation
    adjustment of $69 million.  Derivative assets and derivative liabilities include interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps, foreign
    currency forwards, and interest rate caps.
 
3  Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
    measurement.

 
- 14 -

 


 
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

The determination in classifying a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement.  The following tables summarize the reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (dollars in millions):

Three Months Ended December 31, 2009
 
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
 
Fair value,
October 1,
2009
Total realized
gains/ (losses)2
Purchases,
issuances, and
settlements, net3
Transfers
in to
Level 3
Transfers
out of
Level 3
Total unrealized gains/ (losses)4
Fair value December 31, 2009
               
Available-for-sale securities:
             
Debt Instruments:
             
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
$1
$-
($1)
$-
$-
$-
$-
Asset-backed securities
1
-
(1)
-
-
-
-
Available-for-sale securities Total
2
-
(2)
-
-
-
-
Derivatives:
             
Derivative assets
(liabilities), net3
144
(36)
49
-
-
(89)
68
Embedded derivative
liabilities, net
(29)
1
-
-
-
(2)
(30)
Derivatives total
115
(35)
49
-
-
(91)
38
Total net assets (liabilities)1
$117
($35)
$47
$-
$-
($91)
$38
               
 
1  Level 3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.1%) at December 31, 2009.
 
2  Realized gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold; realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
   securities are considered other-than-temporarily impaired.  Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative contracts when they
   mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
 
3  Net interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases, issuances and settlements, net.
 
4  Represents the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
   income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
   period.  Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
   interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded
   in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Equity.





 
- 15 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Three Months Ended December 31, 2008
 
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)5
 
Fair value,
October 1,
2008
Total realized
gains/ (losses)2
Purchases,
issuances, and
settlements, net3
Transfers
in to
Level 3
Transfers
out of
Level 3
Total unrealized gains/ (losses)4
Fair value
December 31,
2008
               
Available-for-sale securities:
             
Debt Instruments:
             
Corporate debt securities
$-
$-
$2
$-
$-
$-
$2
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
Asset-backed securities
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
Available-for-sale securities Total
2
-
2
-
-
-
4
Derivatives:
             
Derivative assets
(liabilities), net 3
270
(32)
(1)
-
-
124
361
Embedded derivative
liabilities, net
20
-
-
-
-
(23)
(3)
Derivatives Total
290
(32)
(1)
-
-
101
358
Other assets6
424
-
(334)
-
-
-
90
Total net assets (liabilities)1
$716
($32)
($333)
$-
$-
$101
$452
               
1  Level 3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.6%) at December 31, 2008.
2  Realized gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold; realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
   securities are considered other-than-temporarily impaired.  Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative contracts when they
   mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
3  Net interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases, issuances and settlements, net.
4  Represents the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
   income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
   period.  Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
   interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded in
   accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Equity.
5   Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
6   Represents a money market mutual fund balance excluding the credit and liquidity valuation adjustments of $2 million.



 
- 16 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Nine months ended December 31, 2009
 
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)5
 
Fair value,
April 1,
2009
Total realized
gains/ (losses)2
Purchases,
issuances, and
settlements, net3
Transfers
in to
Level 3
Transfers
out of
Level 3
Total unrealized gains/ (losses)4
Fair value
December 31,
2009
               
Available-for-sale securities:
             
Debt Instruments:
             
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
$- 
$- 
$- 
$1
($1) 
$-  
$- 
Asset-backed securities
 (1) 
1
-  
Available-for-sale securities Total
(1) 
2
(1) 
Derivatives:
             
Derivative assets
(liabilities), net 3
(57)    
(132)    
146    
-    
(10)    
121    
68    
Embedded derivative
liabilities, net
(1)    
(1)    
-    
-    
-    
(28)    
(30)    
Derivatives Total
(58)    
(133)    
146    
-    
(10)    
93    
38    
Total net assets (liabilities)1
($58)    
($133)    
$145    
$2    
($11)    
$93    
$38    
               
1  Level 3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.1%) at December 31, 2009.
2  Realized gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold; realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
   securities are considered other-than-temporarily impaired.  Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative contracts when they
   mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
3  Net interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases, issuances and settlements, net.
4  Represents the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
   income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
   period.  Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in interest
   expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded in
   accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Equity.
5   Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.


 
- 17 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Nine months ended December 31, 2008
 
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)5
 
Fair value,
April 1,
2008
Total realized
gains/ (losses)2
Purchases,
issuances, and
settlements, net3
Transfers
in to
Level 3
Transfers
out of
Level 3
Total unrealized gains/ (losses)4
Fair value December 31, 2008
               
Available-for-sale securities:
             
Debt Instruments:
             
Corporate debt securities
$-
$-
$2
$-
$-
$-
$2
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
Asset-backed securities
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
Available-for-sale securities Total
-
-
2
2
-
-
4
Derivatives:
             
Derivative assets
(liabilities), net 3
295
(122)
21
293
-
(126)
361
Embedded derivative
liabilities, net
(40)
-
-
-
-
37
(3)
Derivatives Total
255
(122)
21
293
-
(89)
358
Other assets6
-
-
(334)
424
-
-
90
Total net assets (liabilities)1
$255
($122)
($311)
$719
$-
($89)
$452
               
1  Level 3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.6%) at December 31, 2008.
2  Realized gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold; realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
   securities are considered other-than-temporarily impaired.  Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative contracts when they
   mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
3  Net interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases, issuances and settlements, net.
4  Represents the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
   income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
   period.  Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in interest
   expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.  Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded in
   accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Equity.
5   Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
6   Represents a money market mutual fund balance excluding the credit and liquidity valuation adjustments of $2 million.

 
- 18 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

For each major category of assets, we disclose the fair value on a nonrecurring basis and any changes in fair value during the reporting period.  Certain assets are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances, for example, when there is evidence of impairment.  These assets include impaired finance receivables and a receivable from a money market mutual fund.

The following tables present the financial instruments carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet by caption and by level within the valuation hierarchy for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded during the reporting period (dollars in millions):

Fair value measurements on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2009:

 
 Level 1
 Level 2
Level 3
Total fair value
Finance receivables, net
$-
$-
$177
$177
Other assets
-
-
-
-
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
$-
$-
$177
$177


Fair value measurements on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2009:

 
 Level 1
 Level 2
Level 3
Total fair value
Finance receivables, net
$-
$-
$237
$237
Other assets
-
-
26
26
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
$-
$-
$263
$263


Nonrecurring Fair Value Changes

The following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair value adjustment has been included in the Consolidated Statement of Income (dollars in millions):
 
 
 
Three months ended
Nine months ended
 
December 31,
December 31,
 
2009
2008
2009
2008
Finance receivables, net
($32)
($7)
($49)
($13)

 
- 19 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 2 – Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Significant Changes to Level 3 Assets during the Period

Level 3 net assets reported at fair value on a recurring basis decreased by $79 million and increased by $96 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009, respectively.  The decrease for the three months ended December 31, 2009 is primarily attributable to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to other major currencies in our portfolio.  For the nine months ended December 31, 2009, the fair value of foreign exchange derivatives has appreciated because the U.S. dollar has continued to weaken relative to other major currencies in our portfolio.

Finance receivables, net reflect impaired loans in our dealer credit portfolio.  We recognized $32 million and $49 million of impairment losses for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 where impairment is based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.  The $26 million impaired balance of our money market mutual fund recorded in other assets was fully repaid as of December 31, 2009.

 
- 20 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 3 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The accounting guidance for the fair value of financial instruments requires disclosures of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments and the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate their fair value.  Financial instruments that are within the scope of this accounting guidance are included in the table below.  The accounting guidance does not require disclosure of the fair value of certain financial instruments such as lease financing arrangements and nonfinancial instruments, including goodwill and intangible assets.

The following is a description of financial instruments for which the ending balances as of December 31, 2009 are not carried at fair value in their entirety on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Commercial Paper

These instruments are carried at amounts that approximate fair value due to their short duration and generally negligible credit risk.  Our commercial paper issuances expose us primarily to interest rate risk.  Where available, quoted market prices are used to value commercial paper.
 
 
Finance Receivables

Fair value of finance receivables is generally determined by projecting expected cash flows and discounting those cash flows using a rate reflective of current market conditions.  We estimate cash flows expected to be collected using contractual principal and interest cash flows adjusted for specific factors, such as prepayments, default rates, loss severity, credit scores, and collateral type.  These estimated cash flows are discounted at quoted secondary market rates if available, or estimated market rates that incorporate management’s best estimate of investor assumptions about the portfolio.

Debt

We use quoted market prices for debt when available.  When quoted market prices are not available, fair value is estimated based on current market rates and credit spreads for debt with similar maturities.

The carrying value and estimated fair value of certain financial instruments were as follows (dollars in millions):

 
December 31, 2009
March 31, 2009
 
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
Financial assets
       
Finance receivables, net1
$54,115
$55,457
$54,165
$53,838
         
Financial liabilities
       
Commercial paper
$17,134
$17,134
$18,027
$18,027
Term debt2
$52,044
$50,321
$54,956
$55,101

 
1    Finance receivables are presented net of allowance for credit losses. Amounts exclude related party transactions and direct finance leases.
 
2   Carrying value of term debt represents the sum of notes and loans payable and carrying value adjustment.  Amount includes $4.1 billion and
    $2.0 billion of loans payable to affiliates at December 31 and March 31, 2009, respectively, that are carried at amounts that approximate fair
    value.


 
- 21 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 4 – Investments in Marketable Securities

We classify all of our investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale.  The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments in marketable securities and related unrealized gains and losses were as follows (dollars in millions):

 
December 31, 2009
 
Amortized
cost
 
Unrealized
gains
 
Unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value1
Available-for-sale securities:
             
Debt instruments:
             
U.S. government and agency obligations
$56
 
$-
 
($1)
 
$55
Municipal debt securities
11
 
-
 
-
 
11
Foreign government debt securities
22
 
-
 
-
 
22
Corporate debt securities
79
 
6
 
-
 
85
Mortgage-backed securities:
             
U.S. government agency
113
 
4
 
-
 
117
Non-agency residential
15
 
3
 
-
 
18
Non-agency commercial
23
 
2
 
-
 
25
Asset-backed securities
695
 
7
 
(1)
 
701
Equity instruments:
             
Fixed income mutual funds
1,236
 
42
 
(35)
 
1,243
Equity mutual funds
251
 
90
 
-
 
341
Total investments in marketable securities
$2,501
 
$154
 
($37)
 
$2,618

 
March 31, 20092
 
Amortized
cost
 
Unrealized
gains
 
Unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value1
Available-for-sale securities:
             
Debt instruments:
             
U.S. government and agency obligations
$70
 
$2
 
($1)
 
$71
Municipal debt securities
3
 
-
 
-
 
3
Foreign government debt securities
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
Corporate debt securities
64
 
1
 
(2)
 
63
Mortgage-backed securities:
             
U.S. government agency
110
 
4
 
-
 
114
Non-agency residential
45
 
1
 
(9)
 
37
Non-agency commercial
33
 
1
 
(2)
 
32
Asset-backed securities
384
 
-
 
(8)
 
376
Equity instruments:
             
Preferred stock
1
 
-
 
-
 
1
Fixed income mutual funds
1,334
 
8
 
(92)
 
1,250
Equity mutual funds
245
 
-
 
(5)
 
240
Total investments in marketable securities
$2,289
 
$17
 
($119)
 
$2,187

1 Includes $41 million and $54 million of securities with subprime exposure at December 31 and March 31, 2009,
   respectively.
2  Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

 
- 22 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 4 – Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired Securities

In April 2009, the FASB amended the other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) model for debt securities. The impairment model for equity securities was not affected. Under the revised accounting guidance, an OTTI loss with respect to debt securities must be recognized in earnings if we have the intent to sell the debt security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.

OTTI Evaluation

An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis.   Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI in the Consolidated Statement of Shareholder’s Equity.  We conduct periodic reviews of securities in unrealized loss positions for the purpose of evaluating whether the impairment is other-than-temporary.

As part of our ongoing assessment of OTTI, we consider a variety of factors.  Such factors include the length of time and extent to which the market value has been less than cost, adverse conditions specifically related to the industry, geographic area or financial condition of the issuer or underlying collateral of the security, the volatility of the fair value changes, and changes to the fair value after the balance sheet date.
 
 
For equity securities, we also consider our intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient for recovery of fair value.  Where we lack that intent or ability, the equity security’s decline in fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary and is recorded in earnings.

For debt securities, we also consider the factors identified previously.  However, for debt securities that we do not intend to sell or with respect to which it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell, we also evaluate expected cash flows to be received to determine whether a credit loss has occurred.  In the event of a credit loss, only the amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is recognized in earnings. Amounts relating to factors other than credit losses are recorded in AOCI.  For debt securities that we intend to sell, the OTTI loss is recorded in earnings.

OTTI Recognition and Measurement

In April 2009, we adopted the new accounting guidance for OTTI and did not record a transition adjustment for securities held at March 31, 2009 that were previously considered other-than-temporarily impaired as we intend to sell or believe it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the securities for which we had previously recognized OTTI.

As of December 31, 2009, AFS debt securities that were identified as other-than-temporarily impaired were written down to their current fair value.  For debt securities that we intend to sell or that we believe it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell prior to recovery, an OTTI loss was recognized in earnings.  There were no credit losses on impaired debt securities.  Additionally, there were no AFS equity securities deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, and therefore, all unrealized losses on AFS equity securities were recognized in AOCI.


 
- 23 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 4 – Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

The following table presents other-than-temporary impairment losses that are included in realized losses (dollars in millions):

 
Three months ended
December 31, 2009
Nine months ended
December 31, 2009
Total other-than-temporary impairment losses
$1
$7
Less: Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (pretax)1
-
-
Net impairment losses recognized in income2
$1
$7

1 Represents the non-credit component impact of the other-than-temporary impairment on AFS debt securities.
2 Represents the other-than-temporary impairment on AFS debt securities included in Investment and Other Income in
   the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Unrealized Losses on Securities

At December 31, 2009, the fair value and total gross unrealized loss of investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 consecutive months or more were $286 million and $33 million, respectively.  These investments are comprised of private placement fixed income mutual funds. These securities are predominately investment grade.

We evaluated investment securities with fair values less than amortized cost and have determined that the decline in value is temporary and is primarily a result of liquidity conditions in the current market environment and not from concerns regarding the credit of the issuers or underlying collateral.  We believe it is probable that we will recover our investments, given the current levels of collateral and credit enhancements that exist to protect the investments.  Accordingly, we have not recognized any other-than-temporary-impairment for these securities.

 
- 24 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 4 – Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

The following tables present the aging of fair value and gross unrealized losses for AFS securities (dollars in millions):

 
December 31, 2009
 
Less than 12 months
 
12 months or more
 
Total
 
Fair
value
Unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
Unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
Unrealized
losses
Available-for-sale securities:
               
Debt instruments:
               
U.S. government and agency obligations
$34
($1)
 
$-
$-
 
$34
($1)
Asset-backed securities
347
(1)
 
-
-
 
347
(1)
Equity Instruments:
               
Fixed income mutual funds
80
(2)
 
286
(33)
 
366
(35)
Total investments in marketable securities
$461
($4)
 
$286
($33)
 
$747
($37)


 
March 31, 20091
 
Less than 12 months
 
12 months or more
 
Total
 
Fair
value
Unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
Unrealized
losses
 
Fair
value
Unrealized
losses
Available-for-sale securities:
               
Debt instruments:
               
U.S. government and agency obligations
$11
($1)
 
$-
$-
 
$11
($1)
Corporate debt securities
24
(1)
 
4
(1)
 
28
(2)
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
18
(5)
 
10
(4)
 
28
(9)
Non-agency commercial mortgage-backed securities
20
(2)
 
2
-
 
22
(2)
Asset-backed securities
285
(6)
 
89
(2)
 
374
(8)
Equity instruments:
               
Fixed income mutual funds
1,030
(81)
 
86
(11)
 
1,116
(92)
Equity mutual funds
240
(5)
 
-
-
 
240
(5)
Total investments in marketable securities
$1,628
($101)
 
$191
($18)
 
$1,819
($119)

1 Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.



 
- 25 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 4 – Investments in Marketable Securities (Continued)

The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of marketable securities available-for-sale by contractual maturity dates as of December 31, 2009 (dollars in millions).

 
Available-for-Sale Securities:
Amortized Cost
 
Fair value
Within one year
$82
 
$82
After one year through five years
659
 
669
After five years through ten years
95
 
97
After ten years
178
 
186
Fixed income mutual funds
1,236
 
1,243
Equity mutual funds
251
 
341
Total
$2,501
 
$2,618


 
- 26 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 5 – Finance Receivables, Net

Finance receivables, net consisted of the following (dollars in millions):

 
December 31,
March 31,
 
2009
2009
Retail receivables1
$45,534
$45,312
Dealer financing
10,479
10,939
 
56,013
56,251
     
Deferred origination costs
670
709
Unearned income
(814)
(821)
Allowance for credit losses
   
Retail receivables
(1,187)
(1,375)
Dealer financing
(223)
(190)
 
Total allowance for credit losses
(1,410)
(1,565)
Finance receivables, net
$54,459
$54,574

1 Includes direct finance lease receivables of $345 million and $388 million at December 31 and March 31, 2009, respectively.


The tables below summarize information about impaired finance receivables (dollars in millions):

 
December 31,
 
March 31,
 
     2009
 
2009
Impaired account balances with an allowance
$288
 
$266
Impaired account balances without an allowance
2
 
35
Total impaired account balances
290
 
301
Allowance for credit losses
(113)
 
(64)
Impaired account balances, net
$177
 
$237


Impaired finance receivables primarily consist of dealer financing accounts for which an allowance has been recorded based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.  For those impaired finance receivables for which the fair value of the underlying collateral was in excess of the outstanding balance, no allowance was provided.

 
Three months ended
December 31,
Nine months ended
December 31,
 
2009
2008
2009
2008
         
Average balance of accounts during the period that were impaired as of December 31
$327
$55
$386
$58
         
Interest income recognized on impaired account balances during the period
$2
$-
$6
$-


 
- 27 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 6 – Investments in Operating Leases, Net

Investments in operating leases, net consisted of the following at the dates indicated (dollars in millions):

 
December 31,
March 31,
 
2009
20091
Vehicles
$23,210
$24,332
Equipment and other
837
884
 
24,047
25,216
Deferred origination fees
(116)
(92)
Deferred income
(563)
(523)
Accumulated depreciation
(6,167)
(6,322)
Allowance for credit losses
(230)
(299)
Investments in operating leases, net
$16,971
$17,980

 
1 Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.


 
- 28 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 7 – Allowance for Credit Losses

The following table provides information related to our allowance for credit losses on finance receivables and investments in operating leases (dollars in millions):

 
Three months ended
December 31,
Nine months ended
December 31,
 
2009
2008
2009
2008
Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period
$1,837
$1,048
$1,864
$729
Provision for credit losses
(5)
670
334
1,397
Charge-offs, net of recoveries1
(192)
(329)
(558)
(737)
Allowance for credit losses at end of period
$1,640
$1,389
$1,640
$1,389


 
December 31,     
2009     
December 31,  
2008   
Aggregate balances 60 or more days past due
   
Finance receivables2
$419     
$562     
Operating leases2
111     
175     
Total
$530     
$737     
 
 
1 Net of recoveries of $29 million and $95 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009, respectively, and $23 million and
  $79 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
2 Includes accounts in bankruptcy and excludes accounts for which vehicles have been repossessed.

 
- 29 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 8 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense

Derivative Instruments

We use derivatives as part of our risk management strategy to hedge against changes in interest rate and foreign currency risks.  We manage these risks by entering into derivatives transactions with the intent to minimize fluctuations in earnings, cash flows and fair value adjustments of assets and liabilities caused by market volatility.

Our derivative activities are monitored by our Asset-Liability Committee (“ALCO”), which provides a framework for financial controls and governance to manage these market risks.  We use internal financial models to analyze data from internal and external sources in developing various hedging strategies.  We incorporate the resulting hedging strategies into our overall risk management strategies.

Our liabilities consist mainly of fixed and floating rate debt, denominated in a number of different currencies, which we issue in the global capital markets.  We hedge our interest rate and currency risk inherent in these liabilities by entering into interest rate swaps and cross-currency swaps, which effectively convert our obligations into U.S. dollar-denominated, 3-month LIBOR-based payments.

Our assets consist primarily of U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate receivables.  Our approach to asset-liability management involves hedging our risk exposures so that changes in interest rates have a limited effect on our net interest margin and cash flows.  We use swaps and interest rate caps, executed on a portfolio basis, to manage interest rate risk.  The resulting asset liability profile is consistent with the overall risk management strategy as directed by ALCO.

We enter into derivatives for risk management purposes only, and our use of derivatives is limited to the management of interest rate and foreign currency risks.

Credit Risk Related Contingent Features

Certain of our derivative contracts are governed by International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreements.  Substantially all of these ISDA Master Agreements contain reciprocal ratings triggers providing either party with an option to terminate the agreement at market value in the event of a ratings downgrade of the other party below a specified threshold.  In addition, upon specified downgrades in a party’s credit ratings, the threshold at which that party would be required to post collateral to the other party would be lowered.

The aggregate fair value of derivative instruments that contain credit risk related contingent features that are in a net liability position at December 31, 2009 was $366 million. In the normal course of business, we posted collateral of $5 million at December 31, 2009.  At December 31, 2009, if our ratings would have declined to “A+” as rated by S&P or “A1” as rated by Moody’s, we would have been required to post $67 million of additional collateral to the counterparties with which we were in a net liability position at December 31, 2009.  If our ratings would have declined to “BBB+” or below as rated by S&P or “Baa1” or below as rated by Moody’s, we would have been required to post collateral totaling $366 million to the counterparties with which we were in a net liability position at December 31, 2009.  This is the same amount we would need in order to settle all instruments that were in a net liability position at December 31, 2009.

 
- 30 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 8 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)

Derivative Activity Impact on Financial Statements

The table below shows the location and amount of derivatives at December 31, 2009 as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (dollars in millions):
   
Hedge accounting derivatives
 
Non-hedge
accounting derivatives
 
Total
   
Notional
Fair
value
 
Notional
Fair
value
 
Notional
Fair
value
Other assets
                 
Interest rate swaps
 
$505
$47
 
$11,957
$309
 
$12,462
$356
Foreign currency swaps
 
10,611
2,111
 
13,800
2,006
 
24,411
4,117
Embedded derivatives
 
-
-
 
78
6
 
78
6
Total
 
$11,116
$2,158
 
$25,835
$2,321
 
$36,951
$4,479
                   
Counterparty netting
               
(1,142)
Collateral held1
               
(2,533)
             
Carrying value of derivative contracts – Other assets
         
$804
                   
Other liabilities
                 
Interest rate swaps
 
$36
$-
 
$55,204
($1,208)
 
$55,240
($1,208)
Foreign currency swaps
 
4,544
(205)
 
2,184
(91)
 
6,728
(296)
Foreign currency forwards
 
-
-
 
69
(2)
 
69
(2)
Interest rate caps
 
-
-
 
210
(2)
 
210
(2)
Embedded derivatives
 
-
-
 
371
(36)
 
371
(36)
Total
 
$4,580
($205)
 
$58,038
($1,339)
 
$62,618
($1,544)
                   
Counterparty Netting
               
1,142
Collateral posted1
               
5
         
Carrying value of derivative contracts – Other liabilities
     
($397)

1 As of December 31, 2009, we held collateral of $2,537 million and posted collateral of $9 million.  We netted $4 million of collateral posted by
   a counterparty whose position shifted from a net liability to a net asset subsequent to the date collateral was transferred.  This resulted in
   net collateral held of $2,533 and net collateral posted of $5 million.

 
- 31 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 8 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)

The table below shows the location and amount of derivatives at March 31, 2009 as reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (dollars in millions):

   
Hedge accounting derivatives
 
Non-hedge accounting derivatives
 
Total
   
Notional
Fair
value
 
Notional2
Fair
value
 
Notional
Fair
value
Other assets
                 
Interest rate swaps
 
$962
$90
 
$14,393
$528
 
$15,355
$618
Foreign currency swaps
 
8,328
1,116
 
8,007
411
 
16,335
1,527
Foreign currency forwards
 
-
-
 
1,171
34
 
1,171
34
Interest rate caps
 
-
-
 
160
-
 
160
-
Embedded derivatives
 
-
-
 
293
24
 
293
24
Total
 
$9,290
$1,206
 
$24,024
$997
 
$33,314
$2,203
                   
Counterparty Netting
               
(1,932)
Collateral held1
               
(96)
             
Carrying value of derivative contracts – Other assets
         
$175
                   
Other liabilities
                 
Interest rate swaps
 
$-
$-
 
$59,447
($1,535)
 
$59,447
($1,535)
Foreign currency swaps
 
10,028
(1,289)
 
3,831
(301)
 
13,859
(1,590)
Foreign currency forwards
 
-
-
 
90
-
 
90
-
Embedded derivatives
 
-
-
 
538
(25)
 
538
(25)
Total
 
$10,028
($1,289)
 
$63,906
($1,861)
 
$73,934
($3,150)
                   
Counterparty Netting
               
1,932
Collateral held1
               
(124)
         
Carrying value of derivative contracts – Other liabilities
     
($1,342)

 
1 As of March 31, 2009, we held collateral of $515 million and posted collateral of $295 million.  We netted $419 million of collateral posted by
   a counterparty whose position shifted from a net asset to a net liability subsequent to the date collateral was transferred.  This resulted in
   net collateral held of $96 and net collateral held from counterparties in a net liability position of $124 million.
 
2 Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations.


 
 

 
- 32 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 8 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)

The following table summarizes the components of interest expense, including the location and amount of gains or losses on derivative instruments and related hedged items, for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as reported in our Consolidated Statement of Income (dollars in millions):

 
Three months ended December 31,
Nine months ended
December 31,
 
2009
20084
2009
2008 4
Interest expense on debt1
$553
$691
$1,783
$2,085
Interest expense on pay float hedge accounting derivatives1
(188)
(112)
(573)
(371)
Interest expense on pay float non-hedge accounting derivatives1, 3
(190)
(2)
(509)
(110)
Interest expense on debt, net of pay float swaps
175
577
701
1,604
Interest expense on non-hedge pay fixed swaps1
352
134
998
548
         
Loss (gain) on hedge accounting derivatives:
       
Interest rate swaps2
10
(88)
25
(33)
Foreign currency swaps2
370
306
(1,939)
2,707
Loss (gain) on hedge accounting derivatives
380
218
(1,914)
2,674
Less hedged item:  fixed rate debt4
(399)
(202)
1,895
(2,651)
Ineffectiveness related to hedge accounting derivatives2
(19)
16
(19)
23
         
(Gain) loss on foreign currency transactions
(206)
(7)
1,471
(255)
Loss (gain) on currency swaps and forwards 2
256
(14)
(1,400)
187
         
Loss (gain) on other non-hedge accounting derivatives:
       
Pay float swaps2
87
(285)
220
9
Pay fixed swaps2
(207)
1,409
(416)
398
Total interest expense
$438
$1,830
$1,555
$2,514

1   Amounts represent net interest settlements and changes in accruals.
2   Amounts exclude net interest settlements and changes in accruals.
3   Includes interest expense on both non-hedge accounting foreign currency swaps and forwards, and non-hedge interest rate derivatives.
4   Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.


 
- 33 -

 

TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 8 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)


The following table summarizes the relative fair value allocation of derivative credit valuation adjustments within interest expense (dollars in millions).    

 
Three months ended December 31,
Nine months ended December 31,
 
2009
2008
2009
2008
         
Ineffectiveness related to hedge accounting derivatives
($3)
($16)
$17
($6)
Loss (gain) on currency swaps and forwards
-
(9)
15
(9)
Loss (gain) on non-hedge accounting derivatives:
       
     Pay float swaps
(1)
-
-
1
     Pay fixed swaps
2
(35)
30
(37)
Total credit valuation adjustment allocated to interest expense
($2)
($60)
$62
($51)



 
- 34 -

 

 
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 9 – Other Assets and Other Liabilities

Other assets and other liabilities consisted of the following (dollars in millions):

 
December 31,
2009
 
March 31,
2009
Other assets:
     
Notes receivable from affiliates
$158
 
$1,231
Used vehicles held for sale
265
 
358
Deferred charges
222
 
246
Income taxes receivable
333
 
186
Derivative assets
804
 
175
Other assets
524
 
444
Total other assets
$2,306
 
$2,640
       
Other liabilities:
     
Unearned insurance premiums and contract revenues
$1,380
 
$1,350
Derivative liabilities
397
 
1,342
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
1,259
 
901
Deferred income
243
 
283
Other liabilities
319
 
273
Total other liabilities
$3,598
 
$4,149



 
- 35 -

 

 
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 10 – Debt

Debt and the related weighted average contractual interest rates are summarized below (dollars in millions):
 
   
Weighted Average Contractual
Interest Rates4
 
December 31,
2009
March 31,
2009
December 31,
2009
March 31,
2009
Commercial paper1
$17,134
$18,027
0.20%
1.50%
Notes and loans payable2
50,186
55,053
3.91%
3.96%
Carrying value adjustment3
1,858
(97)
   
Debt
$69,178
$72,983
2.95%
3.35%

1 Includes unamortized discount.
2 Includes unamortized premium/discount and effects of foreign currency transaction gains and losses on non-hedged or de-designated notes
  and loans payable which are denominated in foreign currencies.
3 Represents the effects of fair value adjustments to debt in hedging relationships, accrued redemption premium, and the unamortized fair
  value adjustments on the hedged item for terminated fair value hedge accounting relationships.
4 Calculated based on original notional or par value before consideration of premium or discount or accrued redemption premium.


Included in our notes and loans payable are unsecured notes denominated in various foreign currencies.  At December 31 and March 31, 2009, the carrying value of these notes payable was $33.9 billion and $28.5 billion, respectively.  Concurrent with the issuance of these foreign currency unsecured notes, we entered into currency swaps in the same notional amount to convert non-U.S. currency debt to U.S. dollar denominated payments.