Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-12.1 - EXHIBIT 12.1 - RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_12-1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - 906 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_32-1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - 906 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_32-2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - 302 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_31-1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - 302 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_31-2.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended December 31,
2009
OR
[
] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from _______ to _______
Commission
File Number 1-9961
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
95-3775816
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
19001
S. Western Avenue
Torrance,
California
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
90501
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code: (310)
468-1310
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes x No __
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes __ No __
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated
filer __ Accelerated
filer __
Non-accelerated
filer x Smaller
reporting company __
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
__ No x
As of
January 31, 2010, the number of outstanding shares of capital stock, par value
$10,000 per share, of the registrant was 91,500, all of which shares were held
by Toyota Financial Services Americas Corporation.
Reduced
Disclosure Format
The
registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b)
of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure
format.
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q
For the
quarter ended December 31, 2009
INDEX
|
||
Part
I
|
3
|
|
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
|
Consolidated
Statement of Income
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Shareholder’s Equity
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
|
6
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
|
Item
2
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis
|
47
|
Item
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
74
|
Item
4T
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
74
|
Part
II
|
75
|
|
Item
1
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
75
|
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
76
|
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
76
|
Item
3
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
76
|
Item
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
76
|
Item
5
|
Other
Information
|
76
|
Item
6
|
Exhibits
|
76
|
Signatures
|
77
|
|
Exhibit
Index
|
78
|
- 2
-
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Dollars
in millions)
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||
Financing
revenues:
|
|||||||
Operating
lease
|
$1,179
|
$1,257
|
$3,550
|
$3,688
|
|||
Retail
financing
|
778
|
847
|
2,349
|
2,510
|
|||
Dealer
financing
|
80
|
157
|
251
|
450
|
|||
Total
financing revenues
|
2,037
|
2,261
|
6,150
|
6,648
|
|||
Depreciation
on operating leases
|
897
|
1,078
|
2,626
|
3,103
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
438
|
1,830
|
1,555
|
2,514
|
|||
Net
financing revenues
|
702
|
(647)
|
1,969
|
1,031
|
|||
Insurance
earned premiums and contract revenues
|
112
|
104
|
336
|
314
|
|||
Investment
and other income
|
66
|
111
|
171
|
182
|
|||
Net
financing revenues and other revenues
|
880
|
(432)
|
2,476
|
1,527
|
|||
Expenses:
|
|||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
(5)
|
670
|
334
|
1,397
|
|||
Operating
and administrative
|
192
|
195
|
543
|
613
|
|||
Insurance
losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
51
|
42
|
164
|
143
|
|||
Total
expenses
|
238
|
907
|
1,041
|
2,153
|
|||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
642
|
(1,339)
|
1,435
|
(626)
|
|||
Provision
for (benefit from) income taxes
|
248
|
(527)
|
555
|
(251)
|
|||
Net
income (loss)
|
$394
|
($812)
|
$880
|
($375)
|
|||
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
- 3
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
(Dollars
in millions)
(Unaudited)
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
||
ASSETS
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$4,760
|
$6,298
|
|
Investments
in marketable securities
|
2,618
|
2,187
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
54,459
|
54,574
|
|
Investments
in operating leases, net
|
16,971
|
17,980
|
|
Other
assets
|
2,306
|
2,640
|
|
Total
assets
|
$81,114
|
$83,679
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S
EQUITY
|
|||
Debt
|
$69,178
|
$72,983
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,230
|
2,454
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
3,598
|
4,149
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
76,006
|
79,586
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (See Note 12)
|
|||
Shareholder's
equity:
|
|||
Capital
stock, $10,000 par value (100,000 shares authorized;
|
|||
91,500
issued and outstanding)
|
915
|
915
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
1
|
1
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
72
|
(63)
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
4,120
|
3,240
|
|
Total
shareholder's equity
|
5,108
|
4,093
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholder's equity
|
$81,114
|
$83,679
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
- 4
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
(Dollars
in millions)
(Unaudited)
Capital
stock
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
|
|||||
BALANCE
AT MARCH 31, 2008
|
$915
|
$-
|
$-
|
$3,865
|
$4,780
|
||||
Effects
of accounting change for retirement benefits
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2)
|
(2)
|
||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
||||
Comprehensive
loss activity:
|
|||||||||
Net
loss for the nine months ended December 31, 2008
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(375)
|
(375)
|
||||
Net
unrealized loss on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of tax
benefit of $95 million
|
-
|
-
|
(158)
|
-
|
(158)
|
||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net loss included in net income, net of tax benefit of $1
million
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
-
|
-
|
(156)
|
(375)
|
(531)
|
||||
BALANCE
AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
|
$915
|
$1
|
($156)
|
$3,488
|
$4,248
|
||||
BALANCE
AT MARCH 31, 2009
|
$915
|
$1
|
($63)
|
$3,240
|
$4,093
|
||||
Net
income for the nine months ended
December
31, 2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
880
|
880
|
||||
Net
unrealized gain on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of tax
provision of $78 million
|
-
|
-
|
127
|
-
|
127
|
||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net loss included in net income, net of tax benefit of $5
million
|
-
|
-
|
8
|
-
|
8
|
||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
-
|
-
|
135
|
880
|
1,015
|
||||
BALANCE
AT DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
$915
|
$1
|
$72
|
$4,120
|
$5,108
|
||||
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
- 5
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars
in millions)
(Unaudited)
Nine
months ended December 31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||
Net
income (loss)
|
$880
|
($375)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,714
|
3,209
|
|
Recognition
of deferred income
|
(758)
|
(755)
|
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
334
|
1,397
|
|
Amortization
of deferred origination fees
|
248
|
245
|
|
Fair
value adjustments and amortization of premiums and
discounts
associated with debt, net
|
3,480
|
(2,746)
|
|
Net
(gain) loss from sale of marketable securities
|
(7)
|
16
|
|
Impairment
on marketable securities
|
7
|
7
|
|
Net
change in:
|
|||
Derivative
assets
|
(629)
|
1,031
|
|
Other
assets
|
(142)
|
(201)
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
693
|
(414)
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
(945)
|
480
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
419
|
(227)
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
6,294
|
1,667
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||
Purchase
of investments in marketable securities
|
(880)
|
(1,567)
|
|
Disposition
of investments in marketable securities
|
671
|
1,224
|
|
Acquisition
of finance receivables
|
(15,954)
|
(19,830)
|
|
Collection
of finance receivables
|
15,098
|
15,613
|
|
Net
change in wholesale receivables
|
799
|
218
|
|
Acquisition
of investments in operating leases
|
(5,009)
|
(6,468)
|
|
Disposals
of investments in operating leases
|
3,641
|
3,046
|
|
Advances
to affiliates
|
(1,731)
|
(5,199)
|
|
Repayments
from affiliates
|
2,835
|
4,772
|
|
Other,
net
|
(15)
|
-
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(545)
|
(8,191)
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||
Proceeds
from issuance of debt
|
5,424
|
12,843
|
|
Payments
on debt
|
(13,831)
|
(12,737)
|
|
Net
change in commercial paper
|
(853)
|
8,450
|
|
Net
advances to TFSA (Note 14)
|
-
|
(27)
|
|
Advances
from affiliates (Note 14)
|
2,001
|
-
|
|
Repayments
to affiliates (Note 14)
|
(28)
|
1,679
|
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(7,287)
|
10,208
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,538)
|
3,684
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
6,298
|
736
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
$4,760
|
$4,420
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
|||
Interest
paid
|
$1,636
|
$2,069
|
|
Income
taxes (paid) received
|
($9)
|
$22
|
|
Non-cash
financing:
|
|||
Capital
contribution for stock-based compensation
|
$-
|
$1
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 6
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 1 – Interim Financial
Data
Basis
of Presentation
The
information furnished in these unaudited interim financial statements for the
three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 has been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
(“U.S. GAAP”). In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial
information reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim
periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine
months ended December 31, 2009 do not necessarily indicate the results that may
be expected for the full year.
These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements, significant accounting policies, and other notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2009 (“fiscal 2009”), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) on June 16, 2009. References herein to “TMCC”
denote Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, and references herein to “we”, “our”,
and “us” denote Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
In
preparing these financial statements, we have evaluated events and transactions
for potential recognition or disclosure through February 5, 2010, the date the
financial statements were issued.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Investments
in Marketable Securities
Investments
in marketable securities consist of debt and equity securities. Debt
and equity securities designated as available-for-sale (“AFS”) are carried at
fair value using quoted market prices where available with unrealized gains or
losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of applicable
taxes. We use the specific identification method to determine
realized gains and losses related to our investment
portfolio. Realized investment gains and losses are reflected in
Investment and Other Income in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment
We
periodically evaluate unrealized losses on our AFS debt securities portfolio for
other-than-temporary impairment. If we have no intent to sell and we
believe that it is more likely than not we will not be required to sell these
securities prior to recovery, the credit loss component of the unrealized losses
are recognized in earnings, while the remainder of the loss is recognized in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”). The credit loss component
recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not
expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected
using a credit cash flow analysis for debt securities.
We
perform periodic reviews of our AFS equity securities to determine whether
unrealized losses are temporary in nature. If losses are considered
to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to
fair value and the write down is reflected in Investment and Other Income in the
Consolidated Statement of Income.
- 7
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 1 – Interim Financial
Data (Continued)
Reclassifications
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
New
Accounting Guidance
In
January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the fair
value measurements and disclosure guidance to provide increased disclosures
about transfers of financial assets in and out of Levels 1 and 2. The
new disclosure is effective for us March 31, 2010. Additionally, all
activity in Level 3 must be presented separately. This disclosure is
effective for us March 31, 2011. We do not expect these disclosures
to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that sets forth the
requirements that must be met for a company to recognize revenue from the sale
of a delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement when other
items have not yet been delivered. This accounting guidance is effective for us
on April 1, 2011 and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the accounting
model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software
elements that function together to deliver the product’s essential
functionality. The accounting guidance more closely reflects the underlying
economics of these transactions. This accounting guidance is effective for us on
April 1, 2011 and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In June
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires entities to provide
greater transparency about transfers of financial assets and a company’s
continuing involvement in those transferred financial assets. The accounting
guidance also removes the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. This
accounting guidance is effective for us beginning April 1, 2010 and we do not
expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
In June
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which changes the existing
consolidation model for variable interest entities to a new model based on a
qualitative assessment of power and economics. This accounting guidance is
effective for us beginning April 1, 2010 and we do not expect it to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Guidance
In
January 2010, the FASB issued accounting guidance that addresses the accounting
and reporting for an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership of a
subsidiary, including the deconsolidation of a subsidiary and the exchange of
assets for an equity interest in another entity. This accounting
guidance was effective for us upon issuance, and its adoption did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
In August
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which provided clarification that, in
the absence of a quoted price for a liability, companies may apply methods that
use the quoted price of an investment traded as an asset or other valuation
techniques consistent with the fair-value measurement principle. The adoption of
this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
- 8
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 1 – Interim Financial
Data (Continued)
In June
2009, the FASB issued The
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (the “Codification”) as the single source of
authoritative accounting guidance for public companies. The Codification did not
change generally accepted accounting principles but rather enhanced the way
accounting principles are organized. The Codification was effective for us July
1, 2009 and its adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
In May
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance on subsequent events which requires
companies to address the accounting and disclosure of events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are
available to be issued. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires all companies
to report noncontrolling
interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements and
to account for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling owners as
equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling interest in the
subsidiary. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
In April
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance requiring disclosure about the method
and significant assumptions used to establish the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods as well as annual statements. The
adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In April
2009, the FASB issued additional accounting guidance for other-than-temporary
impairments to improve the consistency in the timing of impairment recognition,
as well as provide greater clarity to investors about credit and non-credit
components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The
adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In April
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which primarily addressed the
measurement of fair value of financial assets and liabilities when there is no
active market or where the price inputs being used could be indicative of
distressed sales. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
- 9
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements
Fair
Value Measurement – Definition and Hierarchy
The
accounting guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. This accounting guidance also establishes a hierarchy for
inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs
by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Fair
value should be based on assumptions that market participants would use,
including a consideration of nonperformance risk. The standard
describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair
value:
Level 1: Quoted
(unadjusted) prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. Examples of
assets currently utilizing Level 1 inputs are most U.S. government securities,
actively exchange-traded equity mutual funds, and money market
funds.
Level 2: Quoted
prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, or inputs that are
observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of
the asset or liability. Examples of assets and liabilities currently
utilizing Level 2 inputs are U.S. government agency securities, corporate bonds,
most mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, private placement investments
in fixed income mutual funds, and most over-the-counter (“OTC”)
derivatives.
Level
3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity may require significant judgment in order to determine the fair
value of the assets and liabilities. Examples of assets and
liabilities currently utilizing Level 3 inputs are structured OTC derivatives
and certain mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.
The use
of observable and unobservable inputs is reflected in the fair value hierarchy
assessment disclosed in the tables within this section. The
availability of observable inputs can vary based upon the financial instrument
and other factors, such as instrument type, market liquidity and other specific
characteristics particular to the financial instrument. To the extent
that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or
unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires additional
judgment by management. The degree of management’s judgment can result in
financial instruments being classified as or transferred to the Level 3
category.
Controls
over Valuation of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
We have
internal controls to ensure the appropriateness of fair value measurements
including validation processes, review of key model inputs, and reconciliation
of period-over-period fluctuations based on changes in key market
inputs. All fair value measurements are subject to
analysis. Review and approval by management is required as part of
the validation processes.
- 10
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Fair
Value Methods
Fair
value is based on quoted market prices, if available. If listed
prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon internally
developed models that primarily use as inputs market-based or independently
sourced market parameters. We use prices and inputs that are current
as of the measurement date, including during periods of market
dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the availability of
prices and inputs may be reduced for certain financial
instruments. This condition could result in a financial instrument
being reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level
3.
Valuation
Adjustments
Counterparty Credit Valuation
Adjustments – Adjustments are required when the market price (or
parameter) is not indicative of the credit quality of the
counterparty.
Non-Performance Credit Valuation
Adjustments – Adjustments reflect our own non-performance risk when our
liabilities are measured at fair value.
Liquidity Valuation
Adjustments – Adjustments are necessary when we are unable to observe
prices for a financial instrument due to market illiquidity.
Valuation
Methods
The
following section describes the valuation methodologies used for financial
instruments measured at fair value, key inputs and significant assumptions in
addition to the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
valuation hierarchy.
Cash Equivalents
Cash
equivalents, consisting of money market instruments, represent highly liquid
investments with maturities of three months or less at
purchase. Generally, quoted market prices are used to determine the
fair value of money market instruments.
Marketable
Securities
The
marketable securities portfolio consists of debt and equity
securities. Where available, we use quoted market prices to measure
fair value for these financial instruments. If quoted prices are not
available, prices for similar assets and matrix pricing models are
used. Some securities may have limited transparency or less
observability; in these situations, fair value may be estimated using various
assumptions such as default rates, loss severity and credit
ratings.
Derivatives
As part
of our risk management strategy, we enter into derivative transactions to
mitigate our interest rate and foreign currency exposures. These
derivative transactions are considered over-the-counter. All of our
derivatives counterparties to which we had credit exposure at December 31, 2009
were assigned investment grade ratings by a nationally recognized statistical
rating organization (“NRSRO”).
- 11
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
We
estimate the fair value of our derivatives using industry standard valuation
models that require observable market inputs, including market prices, yield
curves, credit curves, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, volatilities and
the contractual terms of the derivative instruments. For derivatives
that trade in liquid markets, such as interest rate swaps, model inputs can
generally be verified and do not require significant management
judgment.
Certain
other derivative transactions trade in less liquid markets with limited pricing
information. For such derivatives, key inputs to the valuation
process include quotes from counterparties, and other market data used to
corroborate and adjust values where appropriate. Other market data
includes values obtained from a market participant that serves as a third party
pricing agent. In addition, pricing is validated internally using
valuation models to assess the reasonableness of changes in factors such as
market prices, yield curves, credit curves, interest rates, foreign exchange
rates and volatilities.
Our
derivative fair value measurements consider assumptions about counterparty
credit risk and our own non-performance risk. Generally, we assume
that a valuation that uses the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) curve to
convert future values to present value is appropriate for derivative assets and
liabilities. We consider counterparty credit risk and our own
non-performance risk through credit valuation adjustments. In
situations in which our net position with a derivative counterparty is an asset,
the credit valuation adjustment calculation uses the credit default
probabilities of our derivative counterparties over a particular time
period. In situations in which our net position with a derivative
counterparty is a liability, we use our own credit default probability to
calculate the required non-performance credit valuation
adjustment. We use a relative fair value approach to allocate the
credit valuation adjustments to our derivatives portfolio.
As of
December 31, 2009, we reduced our derivative liabilities in the amount of $4
million to account for our own non-performance risk. Derivative
assets were reduced $15 million to account for counterparty credit
risk.
Finance
Receivables
Our
finance receivables are not carried at fair value on a recurring basis on the
balance sheet, nor are they actively traded. In certain instances,
for finance receivables where there is evidence of impairment we may use an
observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent. The fair values of impaired finance receivables
based on the collateral value or market prices where available are reported at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Additional adjustments may be
considered to reflect current market conditions when estimating fair
value.
Other
Assets
Other
assets consist in part, of a net receivable from a money market mutual fund,
which was adversely affected by the liquidity crisis in the marketplace during
fiscal 2009. Since the net asset value of the money market mutual
fund was no longer publicly available, we used net present value techniques
adjusted for credit and liquidity risks and reported this in other
assets. On March 31, 2009, we considered the money market mutual fund
impaired and recorded a $35 million impairment. The net realizable
value of $26 million was subsequently collected during the nine months ended
December 31, 2009.
- 12
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
The
following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities that were
accounted for at fair value as of December 31, 2009, by level within the fair
value hierarchy (dollars in millions):
Fair
value measurements on a recurring basis
|
|||||
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Counterparty
netting
&
collateral
1
|
Fair
value
|
|
Cash
equivalents
|
$4,508
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$4,508
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||
Debt
instruments:
|
|||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
30
|
25
|
-
|
-
|
55
|
Municipal
debt securities
|
-
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
Foreign
government debt securities
|
-
|
22
|
-
|
-
|
22
|
Corporate
debt securities
|
-
|
85
|
-
|
-
|
85
|
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||
Agency
mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
117
|
-
|
-
|
117
|
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
18
|
-
|
-
|
18
|
Non-agency
commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
25
|
-
|
-
|
25
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
-
|
701
|
-
|
-
|
701
|
Equity
instruments:
|
|||||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
-
|
1,243
|
-
|
-
|
1,243
|
Equity
mutual funds
|
341
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
341
|
Available-for-sale
securities total
|
371
|
2,247
|
-
|
-
|
2,618
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||
Derivative
assets2
|
-
|
4,294
|
179
|
(3,675)
|
798
|
Embedded
derivative assets
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
-
|
6
|
Derivatives
total
|
-
|
4,294
|
185
|
(3,675)
|
804
|
Total
assets 3
|
4,879
|
6,541
|
185
|
(3,675)
|
7,930
|
Derivative
liabilities2
|
-
|
(1,397)
|
(111)
|
1,147
|
(361)
|
Embedded
derivative liabilities
|
-
|
-
|
(36)
|
-
|
(36)
|
Total
liabilities 3
|
-
|
(1,397)
|
(147)
|
1,147
|
(397)
|
Total
net assets and liabilities
|
$4,879
|
$5,144
|
$38
|
($2,528)
|
$7,533
|
|
1 We
have met the accounting guidance for setoff criteria and have elected to
net derivative assets and derivative liabilities and the related
cash collateral received and paid when legally enforceable master netting
agreements exist.
|
|
2 Includes
derivative asset counterparty credit valuation adjustment of $15 million
and derivative liability non-performance credit valuation
adjustment of $4 million. Derivative assets and derivative
liabilities include interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps, foreign
currency
forwards, and interest rate caps.
|
|
3
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their
entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value
measurement.
|
- 13
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
The
following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities that were
accounted for at fair value as of March 31, 2009, by level within the fair value
hierarchy (dollars in millions):
Fair
value measurements on a recurring basis
|
|||||
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Counterparty
netting,
collateral
1
|
Fair
value
|
|
Cash
equivalents
|
$6,129
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$6,129
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||
Debt
instruments:
|
|||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
44
|
27
|
-
|
-
|
71
|
Municipal
debt securities
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
Foreign
government debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Corporate
debt securities
|
-
|
63
|
-
|
-
|
63
|
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||
Agency
mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
114
|
-
|
-
|
114
|
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
37
|
-
|
-
|
37
|
Non-agency
commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
32
|
-
|
-
|
32
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
-
|
376
|
-
|
-
|
376
|
Equity
instruments:
|
|||||
Preferred
stock
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
-
|
1,250
|
-
|
-
|
1,250
|
Equity
mutual funds
|
240
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
240
|
Available-for-sale
securities total
|
285
|
1,902
|
-
|
-
|
2,187
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||
Derivative
assets2
|
-
|
2,020
|
159
|
(2,028)
|
151
|
Embedded
derivative assets
|
-
|
-
|
24
|
-
|
24
|
Derivatives
total
|
-
|
2,020
|
183
|
(2,028)
|
175
|
Total
assets 3
|
6,414
|
3,922
|
183
|
(2,028)
|
8,491
|
Derivative
liabilities2
|
-
|
(2,909)
|
(216)
|
1,808
|
(1,317)
|
Embedded
derivative liabilities
|
-
|
-
|
(25)
|
-
|
(25)
|
Total
liabilities 3
|
-
|
(2,909)
|
(241)
|
1,808
|
(1,342)
|
Total
net assets and liabilities
|
$6,414
|
$1,013
|
($58)
|
($220)
|
$7,149
|
|
1 We
have met the accounting guidance setoff criteria and have elected to net
derivative assets and derivative liabilities and the related cash
collateral received and paid when legally enforceable master netting
agreements exist.
|
|
2 Includes
derivative asset counterparty credit valuation adjustment of $18 million
and derivative liability non-performance credit valuation
adjustment of $69 million. Derivative assets and derivative
liabilities include interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps, foreign
currency forwards, and interest rate
caps.
|
|
3
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their
entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value
measurement.
|
- 14
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
The
determination in classifying a financial instrument within Level 3 of the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors
to the overall fair value measurement. The following tables summarize
the reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (dollars in
millions):
Three
Months Ended December 31, 2009
Fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level
3)
|
|||||||
Fair
value,
October
1,
2009
|
Total
realized
gains/
(losses)2
|
Purchases,
issuances,
and
settlements,
net3
|
Transfers
in
to
Level
3
|
Transfers
out
of
Level
3
|
Total
unrealized gains/ (losses)4
|
Fair
value December 31, 2009
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
Instruments:
|
|||||||
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
$1
|
$-
|
($1)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
1
|
-
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Available-for-sale
securities Total
|
2
|
-
|
(2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||||
Derivative
assets
(liabilities),
net3
|
144
|
(36)
|
49
|
-
|
-
|
(89)
|
68
|
Embedded
derivative
liabilities,
net
|
(29)
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2)
|
(30)
|
Derivatives
total
|
115
|
(35)
|
49
|
-
|
-
|
(91)
|
38
|
Total
net assets (liabilities)1
|
$117
|
($35)
|
$47
|
$-
|
$-
|
($91)
|
$38
|
|
1 Level
3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.1%)
at December 31, 2009.
|
|
2 Realized
gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold;
realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
securities are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired. Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative
contracts when they
mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
|
3 Net
interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in
purchases, issuances and settlements,
net.
|
|
4 Represents
the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in
earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
period. Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income. Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale
securities are recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholder’s Equity.
|
- 15
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Three
Months Ended December 31, 2008
Fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)5
|
|||||||
Fair
value,
October
1,
2008
|
Total
realized
gains/
(losses)2
|
Purchases,
issuances,
and
settlements,
net3
|
Transfers
in
to
Level
3
|
Transfers
out
of
Level
3
|
Total
unrealized gains/ (losses)4
|
Fair
value
December
31,
2008
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
Instruments:
|
|||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
$-
|
$-
|
$2
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$2
|
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Available-for-sale
securities Total
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||||
Derivative
assets
(liabilities),
net 3
|
270
|
(32)
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
124
|
361
|
Embedded
derivative
liabilities,
net
|
20
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(23)
|
(3)
|
Derivatives
Total
|
290
|
(32)
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
101
|
358
|
Other
assets6
|
424
|
-
|
(334)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
Total
net assets (liabilities)1
|
$716
|
($32)
|
($333)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$101
|
$452
|
1 Level
3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.6%)
at December 31, 2008.
|
2 Realized
gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold;
realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
securities are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired. Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative
contracts when they
mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
3 Net
interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases,
issuances and settlements, net.
4 Represents
the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in
earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
period. Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income. Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale
securities are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholder’s Equity.
|
5 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
6 Represents
a money market mutual fund balance excluding the credit and liquidity valuation
adjustments of $2 million.
- 16
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Nine
months ended December 31, 2009
Fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)5
|
|||||||
Fair
value,
April
1,
2009
|
Total
realized
gains/
(losses)2
|
Purchases,
issuances,
and
settlements,
net3
|
Transfers
in
to
Level
3
|
Transfers
out
of
Level
3
|
Total
unrealized gains/ (losses)4
|
Fair
value
December
31,
2009
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
Instruments:
|
|||||||
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1
|
($1)
|
$-
|
$-
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Available-for-sale
securities Total
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
2
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||||
Derivative
assets
(liabilities),
net 3
|
(57)
|
(132)
|
146
|
-
|
(10)
|
121
|
68
|
Embedded
derivative
liabilities,
net
|
(1)
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(28)
|
(30)
|
Derivatives
Total
|
(58)
|
(133)
|
146
|
-
|
(10)
|
93
|
38
|
Total
net assets (liabilities)1
|
($58)
|
($133)
|
$145
|
$2
|
($11)
|
$93
|
$38
|
1 Level
3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.1%)
at December 31, 2009.
|
2 Realized
gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold;
realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
securities are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired. Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative
contracts when they
mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
3 Net
interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases,
issuances and settlements, net.
4 Represents
the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in
earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
period. Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Unrealized
gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholder’s Equity.
|
5 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 17
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Nine
months ended December 31, 2008
Fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)5
|
|||||||
Fair
value,
April
1,
2008
|
Total
realized
gains/
(losses)2
|
Purchases,
issuances,
and
settlements,
net3
|
Transfers
in
to
Level
3
|
Transfers
out
of
Level
3
|
Total
unrealized gains/ (losses)4
|
Fair
value December 31, 2008
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
Instruments:
|
|||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
$-
|
$-
|
$2
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$2
|
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Available-for-sale
securities Total
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||||
Derivative
assets
(liabilities),
net 3
|
295
|
(122)
|
21
|
293
|
-
|
(126)
|
361
|
Embedded
derivative
liabilities,
net
|
(40)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
37
|
(3)
|
Derivatives
Total
|
255
|
(122)
|
21
|
293
|
-
|
(89)
|
358
|
Other
assets6
|
-
|
-
|
(334)
|
424
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
Total
net assets (liabilities)1
|
$255
|
($122)
|
($311)
|
$719
|
$-
|
($89)
|
$452
|
1 Level
3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.6%)
at December 31, 2008.
|
2 Realized
gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold;
realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
securities are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired. Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative
contracts when they
mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
3 Net
interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases,
issuances and settlements, net.
4 Represents
the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in
earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
period. Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Unrealized
gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholder’s Equity.
|
5 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
6 Represents
a money market mutual fund balance excluding the credit and liquidity valuation
adjustments of $2 million.
- 18
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Assets
Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
For each
major category of assets, we disclose the fair value on a nonrecurring basis and
any changes in fair value during the reporting period. Certain assets
are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis but are subject to fair
value adjustments only in certain circumstances, for example, when there is
evidence of impairment. These assets include impaired finance
receivables and a receivable from a money market mutual fund.
The
following tables present the financial instruments carried on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet by caption and by level within the valuation hierarchy for which a
nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded during the reporting period
(dollars in millions):
Fair
value measurements on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2009:
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
fair value
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
$-
|
$-
|
$177
|
$177
|
Other
assets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
|
$-
|
$-
|
$177
|
$177
|
Fair
value measurements on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2009:
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
fair value
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
$-
|
$-
|
$237
|
$237
|
Other
assets
|
-
|
-
|
26
|
26
|
Total
assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
|
$-
|
$-
|
$263
|
$263
|
Nonrecurring
Fair Value Changes
The
following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for
which a fair value adjustment has been included in the Consolidated Statement of
Income (dollars in millions):
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
($32)
|
($7)
|
($49)
|
($13)
|
- 19
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Significant
Changes to Level 3 Assets during the Period
Level 3
net assets reported at fair value on a recurring basis decreased by $79 million
and increased by $96 million for the three and nine months ended December 31,
2009, respectively. The decrease for the three months ended December
31, 2009 is primarily attributable to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar
relative to other major currencies in our portfolio. For the nine
months ended December 31, 2009, the fair value of foreign exchange derivatives
has appreciated because the U.S. dollar has continued to weaken relative to
other major currencies in our portfolio.
Finance
receivables, net reflect impaired loans in our dealer credit
portfolio. We recognized $32 million and $49 million of impairment
losses for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 where impairment is
based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. The $26 million
impaired balance of our money market mutual fund recorded in other assets was
fully repaid as of December 31, 2009.
- 20
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 3 - Fair Value of
Financial Instruments
The
accounting guidance for the fair value of financial instruments requires
disclosures of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments and the
methods and significant assumptions used to estimate their fair
value. Financial instruments that are within the scope of this
accounting guidance are included in the table below. The accounting
guidance does not require disclosure of the fair value of certain financial
instruments such as lease financing arrangements and nonfinancial instruments,
including goodwill and intangible assets.
The
following is a description of financial instruments for which the ending
balances as of December 31, 2009 are not carried at fair value in their entirety
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Commercial
Paper
These
instruments are carried at amounts that approximate fair value due to their
short duration and generally negligible credit risk. Our commercial
paper issuances expose us primarily to interest rate risk. Where
available, quoted market prices are used to value commercial paper.
Finance
Receivables
Fair
value of finance receivables is generally determined by projecting expected cash
flows and discounting those cash flows using a rate reflective of current market
conditions. We estimate cash flows expected to be collected using
contractual principal and interest cash flows adjusted for specific factors,
such as prepayments, default rates, loss severity, credit scores, and collateral
type. These estimated cash flows are discounted at quoted secondary
market rates if available, or estimated market rates that incorporate
management’s best estimate of investor assumptions about the
portfolio.
Debt
We use
quoted market prices for debt when available. When quoted market
prices are not available, fair value is estimated based on current market rates
and credit spreads for debt with similar maturities.
The
carrying value and estimated fair value of certain financial instruments were as
follows (dollars in millions):
December
31, 2009
|
March
31, 2009
|
|||
Carrying
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Financial
assets
|
||||
Finance
receivables, net1
|
$54,115
|
$55,457
|
$54,165
|
$53,838
|
Financial
liabilities
|
||||
Commercial
paper
|
$17,134
|
$17,134
|
$18,027
|
$18,027
|
Term
debt2
|
$52,044
|
$50,321
|
$54,956
|
$55,101
|
|
1 Finance
receivables are presented net of allowance for credit losses. Amounts
exclude related party transactions and direct finance leases.
|
|
2 Carrying
value of term debt represents the sum of notes and loans payable and
carrying value adjustment. Amount includes $4.1 billion and
$2.0 billion of loans payable to affiliates at December 31 and March 31,
2009, respectively, that are carried at amounts that approximate fair
value.
|
- 21
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities
We
classify all of our investments in marketable securities as
available-for-sale. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of
investments in marketable securities and related unrealized gains and losses
were as follows (dollars in millions):
December
31, 2009
|
|||||||
Amortized
cost
|
Unrealized
gains
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value1
|
||||
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
instruments:
|
|||||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
$56
|
$-
|
($1)
|
$55
|
|||
Municipal
debt securities
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
|||
Foreign
government debt securities
|
22
|
-
|
-
|
22
|
|||
Corporate
debt securities
|
79
|
6
|
-
|
85
|
|||
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||||
U.S.
government agency
|
113
|
4
|
-
|
117
|
|||
Non-agency
residential
|
15
|
3
|
-
|
18
|
|||
Non-agency
commercial
|
23
|
2
|
-
|
25
|
|||
Asset-backed
securities
|
695
|
7
|
(1)
|
701
|
|||
Equity
instruments:
|
|||||||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
1,236
|
42
|
(35)
|
1,243
|
|||
Equity
mutual funds
|
251
|
90
|
-
|
341
|
|||
Total
investments in marketable securities
|
$2,501
|
$154
|
($37)
|
$2,618
|
March
31, 20092
|
|||||||
Amortized
cost
|
Unrealized
gains
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value1
|
||||
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
instruments:
|
|||||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
$70
|
$2
|
($1)
|
$71
|
|||
Municipal
debt securities
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
|||
Foreign
government debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Corporate
debt securities
|
64
|
1
|
(2)
|
63
|
|||
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||||
U.S.
government agency
|
110
|
4
|
-
|
114
|
|||
Non-agency
residential
|
45
|
1
|
(9)
|
37
|
|||
Non-agency
commercial
|
33
|
1
|
(2)
|
32
|
|||
Asset-backed
securities
|
384
|
-
|
(8)
|
376
|
|||
Equity
instruments:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
|||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
1,334
|
8
|
(92)
|
1,250
|
|||
Equity
mutual funds
|
245
|
-
|
(5)
|
240
|
|||
Total
investments in marketable securities
|
$2,289
|
$17
|
($119)
|
$2,187
|
1
Includes $41 million and $54 million of securities with subprime exposure at
December 31 and March 31, 2009,
respectively.
2 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 22
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities (Continued)
Other-Than-Temporarily
Impaired Securities
In April
2009, the FASB amended the other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) model for
debt securities. The impairment model for equity securities was not affected.
Under the revised accounting guidance, an OTTI loss with respect to debt
securities must be recognized in earnings if we have the intent to sell the debt
security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.
OTTI
Evaluation
An
unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is
less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are
determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI in the Consolidated
Statement of Shareholder’s Equity. We conduct periodic reviews of
securities in unrealized loss positions for the purpose of evaluating whether
the impairment is other-than-temporary.
As part
of our ongoing assessment of OTTI, we consider a variety of
factors. Such factors include the length of time and extent to which
the market value has been less than cost, adverse conditions specifically
related to the industry, geographic area or financial condition of the issuer or
underlying collateral of the security, the volatility of the fair value changes,
and changes to the fair value after the balance sheet date.
For
equity securities, we also consider our intent and ability to hold the equity
security for a period of time sufficient for recovery of fair
value. Where we lack that intent or ability, the equity security’s
decline in fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary and is recorded in
earnings.
For debt
securities, we also consider the factors identified
previously. However, for debt securities that we do not intend to
sell or with respect to which it is more likely than not that we will not be
required to sell, we also evaluate expected cash flows to be received to
determine whether a credit loss has occurred. In the event of a
credit loss, only the amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is
recognized in earnings. Amounts relating to factors other than credit losses are
recorded in AOCI. For debt securities that we intend to sell, the
OTTI loss is recorded in earnings.
OTTI
Recognition and Measurement
In April
2009, we adopted the new accounting guidance for OTTI and did not record a
transition adjustment for securities held at March 31, 2009 that were
previously considered other-than-temporarily impaired as we intend to sell or
believe it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the
securities for which we had previously recognized OTTI.
As of
December 31, 2009, AFS debt securities that were identified as
other-than-temporarily impaired were written down to their current fair
value. For debt securities that we intend to sell or that we believe
it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell prior to recovery,
an OTTI loss was recognized in earnings. There were no credit losses
on impaired debt securities. Additionally, there were no AFS equity
securities deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, and therefore, all
unrealized losses on AFS equity securities were recognized in AOCI.
- 23
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities (Continued)
The
following table presents other-than-temporary impairment losses that are
included in realized losses (dollars in millions):
Three
months ended
December
31, 2009
|
Nine
months ended
December
31, 2009
|
|
Total
other-than-temporary impairment losses
|
$1
|
$7
|
Less:
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (pretax)1
|
-
|
-
|
Net
impairment losses recognized in income2
|
$1
|
$7
|
1 Represents the non-credit component
impact of the other-than-temporary impairment on AFS debt
securities.
2 Represents the
other-than-temporary impairment on AFS debt securities included in
Investment and Other Income in
the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
Unrealized
Losses on Securities
At
December 31, 2009, the fair value and total gross unrealized loss of investments
that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 consecutive
months or more were $286 million and $33 million, respectively. These
investments are comprised of private placement fixed income mutual funds. These
securities are predominately investment grade.
We
evaluated investment securities with fair values less than amortized cost and
have determined that the decline in value is temporary and is primarily a result
of liquidity conditions in the current market environment and not from concerns
regarding the credit of the issuers or underlying collateral. We
believe it is probable that we will recover our investments, given the current
levels of collateral and credit enhancements that exist to protect the
investments. Accordingly, we have not recognized any
other-than-temporary-impairment for these securities.
- 24
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities (Continued)
The
following tables present the aging of fair value and gross unrealized losses for
AFS securities (dollars in millions):
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
|
12
months or more
|
Total
|
|||||
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
|||
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
||||||||
Debt
instruments:
|
||||||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
$34
|
($1)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$34
|
($1)
|
||
Asset-backed
securities
|
347
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
347
|
(1)
|
||
Equity
Instruments:
|
||||||||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
80
|
(2)
|
286
|
(33)
|
366
|
(35)
|
||
Total
investments in marketable securities
|
$461
|
($4)
|
$286
|
($33)
|
$747
|
($37)
|
March
31, 20091
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
|
12
months or more
|
Total
|
|||||
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
|||
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
||||||||
Debt
instruments:
|
||||||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
$11
|
($1)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$11
|
($1)
|
||
Corporate
debt securities
|
24
|
(1)
|
4
|
(1)
|
28
|
(2)
|
||
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
18
|
(5)
|
10
|
(4)
|
28
|
(9)
|
||
Non-agency
commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
20
|
(2)
|
2
|
-
|
22
|
(2)
|
||
Asset-backed
securities
|
285
|
(6)
|
89
|
(2)
|
374
|
(8)
|
||
Equity
instruments:
|
||||||||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
1,030
|
(81)
|
86
|
(11)
|
1,116
|
(92)
|
||
Equity
mutual funds
|
240
|
(5)
|
-
|
-
|
240
|
(5)
|
||
Total
investments in marketable securities
|
$1,628
|
($101)
|
$191
|
($18)
|
$1,819
|
($119)
|
1 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 25
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities (Continued)
The
following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of marketable
securities available-for-sale by contractual maturity dates as of December 31,
2009 (dollars in millions).
Available-for-Sale
Securities:
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
value
|
|
Within
one year
|
$82
|
$82
|
|
After
one year through five years
|
659
|
669
|
|
After
five years through ten years
|
95
|
97
|
|
After
ten years
|
178
|
186
|
|
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
1,236
|
1,243
|
|
Equity
mutual funds
|
251
|
341
|
|
Total
|
$2,501
|
$2,618
|
- 26
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 5 – Finance
Receivables, Net
Finance
receivables, net consisted of the following (dollars in millions):
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
||
2009
|
2009
|
||
Retail
receivables1
|
$45,534
|
$45,312
|
|
Dealer
financing
|
10,479
|
10,939
|
|
56,013
|
56,251
|
||
Deferred
origination costs
|
670
|
709
|
|
Unearned
income
|
(814)
|
(821)
|
|
Allowance
for credit losses
|
|||
Retail
receivables
|
(1,187)
|
(1,375)
|
|
Dealer
financing
|
(223)
|
(190)
|
|
Total
allowance for credit losses
|
(1,410)
|
(1,565)
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
$54,459
|
$54,574
|
1
Includes direct finance lease receivables of $345 million and $388
million at December 31 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
The
tables below summarize information about impaired finance receivables (dollars
in millions):
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
||
2009
|
2009
|
||
Impaired
account balances with an allowance
|
$288
|
$266
|
|
Impaired
account balances without an allowance
|
2
|
35
|
|
Total
impaired account balances
|
290
|
301
|
|
Allowance
for credit losses
|
(113)
|
(64)
|
|
Impaired
account balances, net
|
$177
|
$237
|
Impaired
finance receivables primarily consist of dealer financing accounts for which an
allowance has been recorded based on the fair value of the underlying
collateral. For those impaired finance receivables for which the fair
value of the underlying collateral was in excess of the outstanding balance, no
allowance was provided.
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Average
balance of accounts during the period that were impaired as of December
31
|
$327
|
$55
|
$386
|
$58
|
Interest
income recognized on impaired account balances during the
period
|
$2
|
$-
|
$6
|
$-
|
- 27
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 6 – Investments in
Operating Leases, Net
Investments
in operating leases, net consisted of the following at the dates indicated
(dollars in millions):
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
|
2009
|
20091
|
|
Vehicles
|
$23,210
|
$24,332
|
Equipment
and other
|
837
|
884
|
24,047
|
25,216
|
|
Deferred
origination fees
|
(116)
|
(92)
|
Deferred
income
|
(563)
|
(523)
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(6,167)
|
(6,322)
|
Allowance
for credit losses
|
(230)
|
(299)
|
Investments
in operating leases, net
|
$16,971
|
$17,980
|
|
1
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
period presentation.
|
- 28
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 7 – Allowance for
Credit Losses
The
following table provides information related to our allowance for credit losses
on finance receivables and investments in operating leases (dollars in
millions):
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Allowance
for credit losses at beginning of period
|
$1,837
|
$1,048
|
$1,864
|
$729
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
(5)
|
670
|
334
|
1,397
|
Charge-offs,
net of recoveries1
|
(192)
|
(329)
|
(558)
|
(737)
|
Allowance
for credit losses at end of period
|
$1,640
|
$1,389
|
$1,640
|
$1,389
|
December
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|
Aggregate
balances 60 or more days past due
|
||
Finance
receivables2
|
$419
|
$562
|
Operating
leases2
|
111
|
175
|
Total
|
$530
|
$737
|
1
Net of recoveries of
$29 million and $95 million for the three and nine months ended December
31, 2009, respectively, and $23 million and
$79 million for the three
and nine months ended December 31, 2008,
respectively.
|
2 Includes accounts in bankruptcy and
excludes accounts for which vehicles have been
repossessed.
- 29
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense
Derivative
Instruments
We use
derivatives as part of our risk management strategy to hedge against changes in
interest rate and foreign currency risks. We manage these risks by
entering into derivatives transactions with the intent to minimize fluctuations
in earnings, cash flows and fair value adjustments of assets and liabilities
caused by market volatility.
Our
derivative activities are monitored by our Asset-Liability Committee (“ALCO”),
which provides a framework for financial controls and governance to manage these
market risks. We use internal financial models to analyze data from
internal and external sources in developing various hedging
strategies. We incorporate the resulting hedging strategies into our
overall risk management strategies.
Our
liabilities consist mainly of fixed and floating rate debt, denominated in a
number of different currencies, which we issue in the global capital
markets. We hedge our interest rate and currency risk inherent in
these liabilities by entering into interest rate swaps and cross-currency swaps,
which effectively convert our obligations into U.S. dollar-denominated, 3-month
LIBOR-based payments.
Our
assets consist primarily of U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate
receivables. Our approach to asset-liability management involves
hedging our risk exposures so that changes in interest rates have a limited
effect on our net interest margin and cash flows. We use swaps and
interest rate caps, executed on a portfolio basis, to manage interest rate
risk. The resulting asset liability profile is consistent with the
overall risk management strategy as directed by ALCO.
We enter
into derivatives for risk management purposes only, and our use of derivatives
is limited to the management of interest rate and foreign currency
risks.
Credit
Risk Related Contingent Features
Certain
of our derivative contracts are governed by International Swaps and Derivatives
Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreements. Substantially all of these
ISDA Master Agreements contain reciprocal ratings triggers providing either
party with an option to terminate the agreement at market value in the event of
a ratings downgrade of the other party below a specified
threshold. In addition, upon specified downgrades in a party’s credit
ratings, the threshold at which that party would be required to post collateral
to the other party would be lowered.
The
aggregate fair value of derivative instruments that contain credit risk related
contingent features that are in a net liability position at December 31, 2009
was $366 million. In the normal course of business, we posted collateral of $5
million at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2009, if our ratings
would have declined to “A+” as rated by S&P or “A1” as rated by Moody’s, we
would have been required to post $67 million of additional collateral to the
counterparties with which we were in a net liability position at December 31,
2009. If our ratings would have declined to “BBB+” or below as rated
by S&P or “Baa1” or below as rated by Moody’s, we would have been required
to post collateral totaling $366 million to the counterparties with which we
were in a net liability position at December 31, 2009. This is the
same amount we would need in order to settle all instruments that were in a net
liability position at December 31, 2009.
- 30
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)
Derivative
Activity Impact on Financial Statements
The table
below shows the location and amount of derivatives at December 31, 2009 as
reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (dollars in millions):
Hedge
accounting derivatives
|
Non-hedge
accounting
derivatives
|
Total
|
|||||||
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
||||
Other
assets
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$505
|
$47
|
$11,957
|
$309
|
$12,462
|
$356
|
|||
Foreign
currency swaps
|
10,611
|
2,111
|
13,800
|
2,006
|
24,411
|
4,117
|
|||
Embedded
derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
78
|
6
|
78
|
6
|
|||
Total
|
$11,116
|
$2,158
|
$25,835
|
$2,321
|
$36,951
|
$4,479
|
|||
Counterparty
netting
|
(1,142)
|
||||||||
Collateral
held1
|
(2,533)
|
||||||||
Carrying
value of derivative contracts – Other assets
|
$804
|
||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$36
|
$-
|
$55,204
|
($1,208)
|
$55,240
|
($1,208)
|
|||
Foreign
currency swaps
|
4,544
|
(205)
|
2,184
|
(91)
|
6,728
|
(296)
|
|||
Foreign
currency forwards
|
-
|
-
|
69
|
(2)
|
69
|
(2)
|
|||
Interest
rate caps
|
-
|
-
|
210
|
(2)
|
210
|
(2)
|
|||
Embedded
derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
371
|
(36)
|
371
|
(36)
|
|||
Total
|
$4,580
|
($205)
|
$58,038
|
($1,339)
|
$62,618
|
($1,544)
|
|||
Counterparty
Netting
|
1,142
|
||||||||
Collateral
posted1
|
5
|
||||||||
Carrying
value of derivative contracts – Other liabilities
|
($397)
|
1 As of December 31, 2009, we held
collateral of $2,537 million and posted collateral of $9
million. We netted $4 million of collateral posted by
a counterparty whose
position shifted from a net liability to a net asset subsequent to the
date collateral was transferred. This resulted in
net collateral held
of $2,533 and net collateral posted of $5 million.
|
- 31
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)
The table
below shows the location and amount of derivatives at March 31, 2009 as reported
in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (dollars in millions):
Hedge
accounting derivatives
|
Non-hedge
accounting derivatives
|
Total
|
|||||||
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
Notional2
|
Fair
value
|
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
||||
Other
assets
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$962
|
$90
|
$14,393
|
$528
|
$15,355
|
$618
|
|||
Foreign
currency swaps
|
8,328
|
1,116
|
8,007
|
411
|
16,335
|
1,527
|
|||
Foreign
currency forwards
|
-
|
-
|
1,171
|
34
|
1,171
|
34
|
|||
Interest
rate caps
|
-
|
-
|
160
|
-
|
160
|
-
|
|||
Embedded
derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
293
|
24
|
293
|
24
|
|||
Total
|
$9,290
|
$1,206
|
$24,024
|
$997
|
$33,314
|
$2,203
|
|||
Counterparty
Netting
|
(1,932)
|
||||||||
Collateral
held1
|
(96)
|
||||||||
Carrying
value of derivative contracts – Other assets
|
$175
|
||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$-
|
$-
|
$59,447
|
($1,535)
|
$59,447
|
($1,535)
|
|||
Foreign
currency swaps
|
10,028
|
(1,289)
|
3,831
|
(301)
|
13,859
|
(1,590)
|
|||
Foreign
currency forwards
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
-
|
90
|
-
|
|||
Embedded
derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
538
|
(25)
|
538
|
(25)
|
|||
Total
|
$10,028
|
($1,289)
|
$63,906
|
($1,861)
|
$73,934
|
($3,150)
|
|||
Counterparty
Netting
|
1,932
|
||||||||
Collateral
held1
|
(124)
|
||||||||
Carrying
value of derivative contracts – Other liabilities
|
($1,342)
|
|
1 As of
March 31, 2009, we held collateral of $515 million and posted collateral
of $295 million. We netted $419 million of collateral posted by
a counterparty whose position shifted from a net asset to a net liability
subsequent to the date collateral was transferred. This
resulted in
net collateral held of $96 and net collateral held from counterparties in
a net liability position of $124
million.
|
|
2
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period
presentations.
|
- 32
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)
The
following table summarizes the components of interest expense, including the
location and amount of gains or losses on derivative instruments and related
hedged items, for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as
reported in our Consolidated Statement of Income (dollars in
millions):
Three
months ended December 31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
20084
|
2009
|
2008
4
|
|
Interest
expense on debt1
|
$553
|
$691
|
$1,783
|
$2,085
|
Interest
expense on pay float hedge accounting derivatives1
|
(188)
|
(112)
|
(573)
|
(371)
|
Interest
expense on pay float non-hedge accounting derivatives1,
3
|
(190)
|
(2)
|
(509)
|
(110)
|
Interest
expense on debt, net of pay float swaps
|
175
|
577
|
701
|
1,604
|
Interest
expense on non-hedge pay fixed swaps1
|
352
|
134
|
998
|
548
|
Loss
(gain) on hedge accounting derivatives:
|
||||
Interest
rate swaps2
|
10
|
(88)
|
25
|
(33)
|
Foreign
currency swaps2
|
370
|
306
|
(1,939)
|
2,707
|
Loss
(gain) on hedge accounting derivatives
|
380
|
218
|
(1,914)
|
2,674
|
Less
hedged item: fixed rate debt4
|
(399)
|
(202)
|
1,895
|
(2,651)
|
Ineffectiveness
related to hedge accounting derivatives2
|
(19)
|
16
|
(19)
|
23
|
(Gain)
loss on foreign currency transactions
|
(206)
|
(7)
|
1,471
|
(255)
|
Loss
(gain) on currency swaps and forwards 2
|
256
|
(14)
|
(1,400)
|
187
|
Loss
(gain) on other non-hedge accounting derivatives:
|
||||
Pay
float swaps2
|
87
|
(285)
|
220
|
9
|
Pay
fixed swaps2
|
(207)
|
1,409
|
(416)
|
398
|
Total
interest expense
|
$438
|
$1,830
|
$1,555
|
$2,514
|
1 Amounts
represent net interest settlements and changes in accruals.
2 Amounts
exclude net interest settlements and changes in accruals.
3 Includes
interest expense on both non-hedge accounting foreign currency swaps and
forwards, and non-hedge interest rate
derivatives.
|
4 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 33
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)
The
following table summarizes the relative fair value allocation of derivative
credit valuation adjustments within interest expense (dollars in
millions).
Three
months ended December 31,
|
Nine
months ended December 31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Ineffectiveness
related to hedge accounting derivatives
|
($3)
|
($16)
|
$17
|
($6)
|
Loss
(gain) on currency swaps and forwards
|
-
|
(9)
|
15
|
(9)
|
Loss
(gain) on non-hedge accounting derivatives:
|
||||
Pay
float swaps
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Pay
fixed swaps
|
2
|
(35)
|
30
|
(37)
|
Total
credit valuation adjustment allocated to interest expense
|
($2)
|
($60)
|
$62
|
($51)
|
- 34
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 9 – Other Assets and
Other Liabilities
Other
assets and other liabilities consisted of the following (dollars in
millions):
|
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
||
Other
assets:
|
|||
Notes
receivable from affiliates
|
$158
|
$1,231
|
|
Used
vehicles held for sale
|
265
|
358
|
|
Deferred
charges
|
222
|
246
|
|
Income
taxes receivable
|
333
|
186
|
|
Derivative
assets
|
804
|
175
|
|
Other
assets
|
524
|
444
|
|
Total
other assets
|
$2,306
|
$2,640
|
|
Other
liabilities:
|
|||
Unearned
insurance premiums and contract revenues
|
$1,380
|
$1,350
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
397
|
1,342
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
1,259
|
901
|
|
Deferred
income
|
243
|
283
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
319
|
273
|
|
Total
other liabilities
|
$3,598
|
$4,149
|
- 35
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 10 –
Debt
Debt and
the related weighted average contractual interest rates are summarized below
(dollars in millions):
Weighted
Average Contractual
Interest
Rates4
|
||||
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
Commercial
paper1
|
$17,134
|
$18,027
|
0.20%
|
1.50%
|
Notes
and loans payable2
|
50,186
|
55,053
|
3.91%
|
3.96%
|
Carrying
value adjustment3
|
1,858
|
(97)
|
||
Debt
|
$69,178
|
$72,983
|
2.95%
|
3.35%
|
1
Includes unamortized discount.
|
2
Includes unamortized premium/discount and effects of foreign currency
transaction gains and losses on non-hedged or de-designated
notes
and
loans payable which are denominated in foreign
currencies.
|
3
Represents the effects of fair value adjustments to debt in hedging
relationships, accrued redemption premium, and the unamortized fair
value adjustments on the hedged item for terminated fair value hedge
accounting relationships.
|
4
Calculated based on original notional or par value before
consideration of premium or discount or accrued redemption
premium.
|
Included
in our notes and loans payable are unsecured notes denominated in various
foreign currencies. At December 31 and March 31, 2009, the carrying
value of these notes payable was $33.9 billion and $28.5 billion,
respectively. Concurrent with the issuance of these foreign currency
unsecured notes, we entered into currency swaps in the same notional amount to
convert non-U.S. currency debt to U.S. dollar denominated payments.
Additionally,
the carrying value of our notes at December 31, 2009 includes $12.2 billion of
unsecured floating rate notes with contractual interest rates ranging from 0
percent to 9.6 percent and $39.8 billion of unsecured fixed rate notes with
contractual interest rates ranging from 0 percent to 15.3
percent. Upon issuance of fixed rate notes, we generally elect to
enter into interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate payments on notes to
floating rate payments. The carrying value adjustment on debt
increased by $2.0 billion at December 31, 2009 compared to March 31, 2009
primarily as a result of a weaker U.S. dollar relative to certain other
currencies in which some of our debt is denominated.
As of
December 31, 2009, our commercial paper had an average remaining maturity of 39
days. Our notes and loans payable mature on various dates through
fiscal 2047.
- 36
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 11 – Liquidity
Facilities and Letters of Credit
For
additional liquidity purposes, we maintain syndicated bank credit facilities
with certain banks.
364
Day Credit Agreement
In March
2009, TMCC, its subsidiary Toyota Credit de Puerto Rico Corp. (“TCPR”), and
other Toyota affiliates entered into a $5.0 billion 364 day syndicated bank
credit facility pursuant to a 364 Day Credit Agreement. The ability
to make draws is subject to covenants and conditions customary in a transaction
of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions
and limitations on consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. The
364 Day Credit Agreement may be used for general corporate purposes and was not
drawn upon at December 31 and March 31, 2009.
Five
Year Credit Agreement
In March
2007, TMCC, TCPR, and other Toyota affiliates entered into an $8.0 billion five
year syndicated bank credit facility pursuant to a Five Year Credit Agreement.
The ability to make draws is subject to covenants and conditions customary in a
transaction of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default
provisions and limitations on consolidations, mergers and sales of
assets. The Five Year Credit Agreement may be used for general
corporate purposes and was not drawn upon at December 31 and March 31,
2009.
Letters
of Credit Facilities Agreement
In
addition, TMCC has uncommitted letters of credit facilities totaling $5 million
at December 31 and March 31, 2009. Of the total credit facilities, $1
million of the uncommitted letters of credit facilities was issued and
outstanding at December 31 and March 31, 2009.
Other
Credit Agreements
TMCC has
two additional bank credit facilities. The first is a 364 day
committed bank credit facility in the amount of JPY 100 billion (approximately
$1.1 billion as of December 31, 2009) which was entered into in December 2009 to
replace a similar facility which expired that month. The second is a
364 day uncommitted bank credit facility in the amount of JPY 100 billion
(approximately $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2009), which was entered into in
December 2008 and extended in December 2009 for an additional 364
days. Both of these agreements contain covenants and conditions
customary in a transaction of this nature, including negative pledge provisions,
cross-default provisions and limitations on consolidations, mergers and sales of
assets. Neither of these facilities was drawn upon at December 31 and
March 31, 2009.
We are in
compliance with the covenants and conditions of the credit agreements described
above.
- 37
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 12 – Commitments and
Contingencies
Commitments
and Guarantees
We have
entered into certain commitments and guarantees described below. The
maximum amounts under these commitments and guarantees are summarized in the
table below (dollars in millions):
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
Commitments:
|
||
Credit
facilities with vehicle and industrial equipment dealers
|
$6,464
|
$6,677
|
Facilities
lease commitments1
|
94
|
98
|
Total
commitments
|
6,558
|
6,775
|
Guarantees
and other contingencies:
|
||
Guarantees
of affiliate bonds
|
100
|
100
|
Total
commitments and guarantees
|
$6,658
|
$6,875
|
Wholesale
financing demand note facilities2
|
$9,690
|
$10,291
|
|
1
Includes $60 million and $55 million in facilities lease
commitments with affiliates at December 31 and March 31, 2009,
respectively.
|
|
2
Amounts are not considered to be contractual commitments as they
are not binding arrangements under which TMCC is required to
perform. At December 31 and March 31, 2009, amounts outstanding
were $4.8 billion and $5.6 billion,
respectively.
|
As of
December 31, 2009, there have been no material changes to our commitments as
described in Note 16 – Commitments and Contingencies of our fiscal 2009 Form
10-K, except as described below.
Commitments
We
provide fixed and variable rate credit facilities to vehicle and industrial
equipment dealers. These credit facilities are typically used for
business acquisitions, facilities refurbishment, real estate purchases, and
working capital requirements. These loans are typically
collateralized with liens on real estate, vehicle inventory, and/or other
dealership assets, as appropriate. We obtain a personal guarantee
from the vehicle or industrial equipment dealer or a corporate guarantee from
the dealership when deemed prudent. Although the loans are typically
collateralized or guaranteed, the value of the underlying collateral or
guarantees may not be sufficient to cover our exposure under such
agreements. We price the credit facilities to reflect the credit
risks assumed in entering into the credit facility. Amounts drawn
under these facilities are reviewed for collectibility on a quarterly basis, in
conjunction with our evaluation of the allowance for credit
losses. We also provide financing to various multi-franchise dealer
organizations, referred to as dealer groups, often as part of a lending
consortium, for wholesale, working capital, real estate, and business
acquisitions. Of the total credit facilities available to vehicle and
industrial equipment dealers, $5.1 billion and $5.0 billion were outstanding at
December 31 and March 31, 2009, respectively, and were recorded in finance
receivables, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
- 38
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 12 – Commitments and
Contingencies (Continued)
We are
party to a 15-year lease agreement with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. (“TMS”)
for our headquarters location in the TMS headquarters complex in Torrance,
California. At December 31, 2009, minimum future commitments under
lease agreements to which we are a lessee, including those under the agreement
discussed above, are as follows: fiscal years ending March 31, 2010 - $6
million; 2011 - $20 million; 2012 - $16 million; 2013 $12 million; 2014 - $9
million and thereafter – $31 million.
Guarantees
and Other Contingencies
TMCC has
guaranteed certain bond obligations relating to two affiliates totaling $100
million of principal and interest that were issued by Putnam County, West
Virginia and Gibson County, Indiana. The bonds mature in the
following fiscal years ending March 31: 2028 - $20 million; 2029 - $50 million;
2030 - $10 million; 2031 - $10 million; and 2032 - $10 million. TMCC
would be required to perform under the guarantees in the event of failure by the
affiliates to fulfill their obligations; bankruptcy involving the affiliates or
TMCC; or failure to observe any covenant, condition, or agreement under the
guarantees by the affiliates, bond issuers, or TMCC.
These
guarantees include provisions whereby TMCC is entitled to reimbursement by the
affiliates for amounts paid. TMCC receives an annual fee of $78,000
for guaranteeing such payments. TMCC has not been required to perform
under any of these affiliate bond guarantees as of December 31 and March 31,
2009. The fair value of these guarantees was approximately $0.9
million and $1.1 million at December 31 and March 31, 2009. As of
December 31 and March 31, 2009, no liability amounts have been recorded related
to the guarantees as management has determined that it is not probable that we
would be required to perform under these affiliate bond
guarantees. In addition, other than the fee discussed above, there
are no corresponding expenses or cash flows arising from these
guarantees.
Indemnification
In the
ordinary course of business, we enter into agreements containing indemnification
provisions standard in the industry related to several types of transactions,
including, but not limited to, debt funding, derivatives, and our vendor and
supplier agreements. Performance under these indemnities would occur
upon a breach of the representations, warranties or covenants made or given, or
a third party claim. In addition, we have agreed in certain debt and
derivative issuances, and subject to certain exceptions, to gross-up payments
due to third parties in the event that withholding tax is imposed on such
payments. In addition, certain of our funding arrangements would
require us to pay lenders for increased costs due to certain changes in laws or
regulations. Due to the difficulty in predicting events which could
cause a breach of the indemnification provisions or trigger a gross-up or other
payment obligation, we are not able to estimate our maximum exposure to future
payments that could result from claims made under such provisions. We
have not made any material payments in the past as a result of these provisions,
and as of December 31, 2009, we determined that it is not probable that we will
be required to make any material payments in the future. As of December 31 and
March 31, 2009, no amounts have been recorded under these
indemnifications.
- 39
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 12 – Commitments and
Contingencies (Continued)
Litigation
Various
legal actions, governmental proceedings and other claims are pending or may be
instituted or asserted in the future against us with respect to matters arising
in the ordinary course of business. Certain of these actions are or purport to
be class action suits, seeking sizeable damages and/or changes in our business
operations, policies and practices. Certain of these actions are
similar to suits that have been filed against other financial institutions and
captive finance companies. We perform periodic reviews of pending
claims and actions to determine the probability of adverse verdicts and
resulting amounts of liability. We establish reserves for legal
claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and the costs
can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving legal
claims and associated costs of defense may be substantially higher or lower than
the amounts reserved for these claims. However, based on information
currently available and established reserves, we expect that the ultimate
liability resulting from these claims will not have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial statements.
Repossession
Class Actions
A
cross-complaint alleging a class action in the Superior Court of California
Stanislaus County, Garcia v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, filed in August
2007, claims that TMCC's post-repossession notice failed to comply with the
Reese-Levering Automobile Sales Finance Act of California
("Reese-Levering"). An additional cross-complaint alleging a class
action in the Superior Court of California San Francisco County, Aquilar and
Smith v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, filed in February 2008, contains
similar allegations claiming that TMCC's post-repossession notices failed to
comply with Reese-Levering. The plaintiffs are seeking injunctive
relief, restitution and/or disgorgement, as well as damages in the Aquilar
matter. In May 2008, the Garcia and Aquilar cases (“Garcia Cases”)
were consolidated in Stanislaus County as they present nearly identical
questions of law and fact. A complaint alleging a class action in the
Superior Court of California San Diego County, McNess v. Toyota Motor Credit
Corporation, filed in September 2008, contains similar allegations claiming that
TMCC’s post-repossession notice failed to comply with
Reese-Levering. An additional complaint alleging a class action in
the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, Smith v. Toyota Motor
Credit Corporation, filed in December 2008, also contains similar allegations
claiming that TMCC’s post repossession notice failed to comply with
Reese-Levering. The plaintiffs in the McNess and Smith cases
are seeking injunctive relief and restitution. The McNess and Smith
cases were consolidated with the Garcia Cases in November 2008 and January 2009,
respectively, as they present nearly identical questions of law and
fact. A First Amended Cross-Complaint and Complaint was subsequently
filed in the Superior Court of California Stanislaus County in February
2009. As the result of a mediation in January 2010, the parties
agreed to settle all of the foregoing matters. The proposed
settlement, for which we have adequately reserved, is subject to final court
approval.
- 40
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 13 – Income
Taxes
Our
effective tax rate was 39 percent during the first nine months of fiscal 2010
and 40 percent for the same period in fiscal 2009. Our provision for
income taxes for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was $555 million compared
to a benefit of $251 million for the same period in fiscal 2009. This
increase in provision is consistent with the increase in our income before tax
for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to the first nine months of
fiscal 2009.
Tax
Related Contingencies
We are
routinely subject to U.S. federal, state and local, and foreign income tax
examinations by tax authorities in various jurisdictions. We are in various
stages of completion of several income tax examinations, including an
examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the taxable years March 31, 2004
through March 31, 2009. Subsequent to the closing of the quarter, the
Internal Revenue Service completed its examination for the taxable years March
31, 2004 through March 31, 2006. As a result of this final
determination, we have received a refund of tax and interest in the amount of
$282 million.
We
periodically review our uncertain tax positions. In conjunction with this
review, we reduced the liability for unrecognized tax benefits during the first
nine months of fiscal 2010. Our assessment is based on many factors including
the ongoing IRS audits. This assessment resulted in a decrease in unrecognized
tax benefits of $131 million for the nine months ended December 31,
2009. The decrease in unrecognized tax benefits for the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 is primarily the result of an agreement with the IRS in
favor of TMCC reached on these issues and was related to timing differences on
prior income tax returns and did not impact our effective tax rate.
Our
deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009, were $2.1 billion and were primarily
due to the deferred deduction of allowance for credit losses and cumulative
federal tax loss carryforwards that expire in varying amounts through fiscal
year 2029. The total deferred tax liability at December 31, 2009, net of these
deferred tax assets, was $3.2 billion. Realization with respect to the federal
tax loss carryforwards is dependent on generating sufficient income prior to
expiration of the loss carryforwards. Although realization is not assured,
management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will
be realized. The amount of the deferred tax assets considered realizable could
be reduced if management’s estimates change.
- 41
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 14 – Related Party
Transactions
As of
December 31, 2009, there have been no material changes to our related party
agreements or relationships as described in our fiscal 2009 Form 10-K, except as
described below. The table below summarizes the amounts included in
our Consolidated Balance Sheet under various related party agreements or
relationships (dollars in millions):
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
Assets:
|
||
Finance
receivables, net
|
||
Accounts
receivable from affiliates
|
$18
|
$28
|
Notes
receivable under home loan programs
|
$28
|
$33
|
Deferred
retail subvention support income from affiliates
|
($634)
|
($620)
|
Investments
in operating leases, net
|
||
Leases
to affiliates
|
$30
|
$34
|
Deferred
lease subvention support income from affiliates
|
($561)
|
($521)
|
Other
assets
|
||
Notes
receivable from affiliates
|
$158
|
$1,231
|
Accounts
receivable from affiliates
|
$116
|
$73
|
Subvention
support receivable from affiliates
|
$115
|
$54
|
Liabilities:
|
||
Debt
|
||
Loans
payable to affiliates
|
$4,070
|
$2,000
|
Other
liabilities
|
||
Accounts
payable to affiliates
|
$238
|
$154
|
Notes
payable to affiliate
|
$53
|
$80
|
Shareholder’s
equity:
|
||
Stock
based compensation
|
$1
|
$1
|
- 42
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 14 – Related Party
Transactions (Continued)
The table
below summarizes the amounts included in our Consolidated Statement of Income
under various related party agreements or relationships (dollars in
millions):
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
20081
|
2009
|
20081
|
|
Net
financing margin:
|
||||
Manufacturers’
subvention support and other revenues
|
$200
|
$203
|
$572
|
$566
|
Credit
support fees incurred
|
($9)
|
($12)
|
($29)
|
($35)
|
Foreign
exchange (loss) gain on notes receivable from affiliates
|
($24)
|
$104
|
$32
|
$99
|
Foreign
exchange gain (loss) on loans payable to affiliates
|
$72
|
$-
|
($38)
|
$-
|
Interest
expense on loans payable to affiliates
|
($14)
|
$-
|
($56)
|
$-
|
Insurance
earned premiums and contract revenues:
|
||||
Affiliate
insurance premiums, commissions, and
contract
revenues
|
$22
|
$17
|
$66
|
$51
|
Investments
and other income:
|
||||
Interest
earned on notes receivable from affiliates
|
$-
|
$3
|
$1
|
$10
|
Expenses:
|
||||
Shared
services charges and other expenses
|
$10
|
$9
|
$28
|
$31
|
Employee
benefits expense
|
$15
|
$12
|
$47
|
$40
|
1 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
TFSC
Conduit Finance Agreements
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Toyota Financial Services Corporation (“TFSC”)
and TMCC entered into a conduit finance agreement under which TFSC passes along
to TMCC certain funds that TFSC receives from other financial institutions
solely for the benefit of TMCC. TFSC and TMCC entered into a similar conduit
finance agreement during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009. Refer to Note 16 of our Form 10-K dated March 31, 2009
for further information. At December 31, 2009, the
aggregate amount of the loans payable to TFSC under these agreements was
approximately $4.1 billion. Included in the balance reported as of
December 31, 2009 is $69 million carrying value adjustment for foreign currency
exchange losses for portions of the debt denominated in foreign
currency.
- 43
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 14 – Related Party
Transactions (Continued)
Affiliate
Insurance Premiums, Commissions, and Other Revenues
Affiliate
insurance premiums, commissions, and other revenues primarily represent revenues
from Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc. (“TMIS”) for administrative services
and various levels and types of insurance coverage provided to TMS. These
services include the warranty coverage for TMS’ certified pre-owned vehicle
programs and the umbrella liability insurance policy. TMIS, through
its wholly-owned subsidiary, provides umbrella liability insurance to TMS and
affiliates covering certain dollar value layers of risk above various primary or
self-insured retentions. On all layers in which TMIS has provided coverage, 99
percent of the risk has been ceded to various reinsurers.
Premiums,
commissions, and other revenues are reflected within the Related Party
Transaction Table. Affiliate insurance agreements issued were $78
million and $95 million for December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively. The unearned income from these agreements was $212
million and $196 million for December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009,
respectively.
- 44
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 15 – Segment
Information
Financial
information for our reportable operating segments for the three and nine months
ended or at December 31 is summarized as follows (dollars in
millions):
Fiscal
2010:
|
Finance
operations
|
Insurance
operations
|
Intercompany
eliminations
|
Total
|
|||
Three
months ended December 31, 2009:
|
|||||||
Total
financing revenues
|
$2,032
|
$-
|
$5
|
$2,037
|
|||
Insurance
earned premiums and contract revenues
|
-
|
117
|
(5)
|
112
|
|||
Investment
and other income
|
12
|
56
|
(2)
|
66
|
|||
Total
gross revenues
|
2,044
|
173
|
(2)
|
2,215
|
|||
Less:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
on operating leases
|
897
|
-
|
-
|
897
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
440
|
-
|
(2)
|
438
|
|||
Provision
for credit losses
|
(5)
|
-
|
-
|
(5)
|
|||
Operating
and administrative expenses
|
161
|
31
|
-
|
192
|
|||
Insurance
losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
-
|
51
|
-
|
51
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
216
|
32
|
-
|
248
|
|||
Net
income
|
$335
|
$59
|
$-
|
$394
|
|||
Nine
months ended December 31, 2009:
|
|||||||
Total
financing revenues
|
$6,137
|
$-
|
$13
|
$6,150
|
|||
Insurance
earned premiums and contract revenues
|
-
|
349
|
(13)
|
336
|
|||
Investment
and other income
|
47
|
129
|
(5)
|
171
|
|||
Total
gross revenues
|
6,184
|
478
|
(5)
|
6,657
|
|||
Less:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
on operating leases
|
2,626
|
-
|
-
|
2,626
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
1,560
|
-
|
(5)
|
1,555
|
|||
Provision
for credit losses
|
334
|
-
|
-
|
334
|
|||
Operating
and administrative expenses
|
449
|
94
|
-
|
543
|
|||
Insurance
losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
-
|
164
|
-
|
164
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
476
|
79
|
-
|
555
|
|||
Net
income
|
$739
|
$141
|
$-
|
$880
|
|||
Total
assets at December 31, 2009
|
$78,752
|
$2,723
|
($361)
|
$81,114
|
|||
- 45
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 15 – Segment
Information (Continued)
Fiscal 2009 1:
|
Finance
operations
|
Insurance
operations
|
Intercompany
eliminations
|
Total
|
|||
Three
months ended December 31, 2008:
|
|||||||
Total
financing revenues
|
$2,261
|
$-
|
$-
|
$2,261
|
|||
Insurance
earned premiums and contract revenues
|
-
|
104
|
-
|
104
|
|||
Investment
and other income
|
19
|
94
|
(2)
|
111
|
|||
Total
gross revenues
|
2,280
|
198
|
(2)
|
2,476
|
|||
Less:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
on operating leases
|
1,078
|
-
|
-
|
1,078
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
1,832
|
-
|
(2)
|
1,830
|
|||
Provision
for credit losses
|
670
|
-
|
-
|
670
|
|||
Operating
and administrative expenses
|
161
|
34
|
-
|
195
|
|||
Insurance
losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
-
|
42
|
-
|
42
|
|||
(Benefit
from) provision for income taxes
|
(571)
|
44
|
-
|
(527)
|
|||
Net
(loss) income
|
($890)
|
$78
|
$-
|
($812)
|
|||
Nine
months ended December 31, 2008:
|
|||||||
Total
financing revenues
|
$6,648
|
$-
|
$-
|
$6,648
|
|||
Insurance
earned premiums and contract revenues
|
-
|
314
|
-
|
314
|
|||
Investment
and other income
|
61
|
126
|
(5)
|
182
|
|||
Total
gross revenues
|
6,709
|
440
|
(5)
|
7,144
|
|||
Less:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
on operating leases
|
3,103
|
-
|
-
|
3,103
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
2,519
|
-
|
(5)
|
2,514
|
|||
Provision
for credit losses
|
1,397
|
-
|
-
|
1,397
|
|||
Operating
and administrative expenses
|
504
|
109
|
-
|
613
|
|||
Insurance
losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
-
|
143
|
-
|
143
|
|||
(Benefit
from) provision for income taxes
|
(319)
|
68
|
-
|
(251)
|
|||
Net
(loss) income
|
($495)
|
$120
|
$-
|
($375)
|
|||
Total
assets at December 31, 2008
|
$85,291
|
$2,435
|
($666)
|
$87,060
|
|||
1 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 46
-
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Cautionary Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Certain
statements contained in this Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference herein are
“forward looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on current
expectations and currently available information. However, since
these statements are based on factors that involve risks and uncertainties, our
performance and results may differ materially from those described or implied by
such forward-looking statements. Words such as “believe,”
“anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “intend,”
“will,” “may” or words or phrases of similar meaning are intended to
identify forward looking statements. We caution that the
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other important factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from
those in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the risk
factors set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
(“Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (“fiscal
2009”). We will not update the forward-looking statements to reflect
actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking
statements.
OVERVIEW
Factors
Affecting Our Business and Key Performance Indicators
Our
financial results are affected by a variety of economic and industry factors,
including but not limited to, new and used vehicle markets, the level of Toyota
and Lexus sales, new vehicle incentives, consumer behavior, level of employment,
our ability to respond to changes in interest rates with respect to both
contract pricing and funding, the financial health of our dealers, and the level
of competitive pressure. Changes in these factors can influence the
demand for new and used vehicles, the number of contracts that default and the
loss per occurrence, the realizability of residual values on our lease earning
assets, and our gross margins on financing volume. Additionally, our
funding programs and related costs are influenced by changes in the capital
markets and prevailing interest rates, which may affect our ability to obtain
cost effective funding to support earning asset growth.
We
generate revenue, income, and cash flows by providing retail financing, leasing,
dealer financing, and certain other financial products and services to vehicle
and industrial equipment dealers and their customers. We measure the
performance of our financing operations using the following metrics: financing
volume, market share, return on assets, financial leverage, financing margins
and loss metrics.
We also
generate revenue through marketing, underwriting, and administering insurance
agreements related to covering certain risks of vehicle dealers and their
customers. We measure the performance of our insurance operations
using the following metrics: agreement volume, number of agreements in force,
investment portfolio return, and loss metrics.
- 47
-
Fiscal
2010 First Nine Months Operating Environment
During
the first nine months of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010 (“fiscal 2010”),
economic conditions in the United States remained weak. Unemployment
was high, home values depreciated and commodity prices
fluctuated. These factors have led to an overall decline in consumer
confidence and household income for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 as
compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. While these conditions
continue to affect some of our customers and have dampened automobile sales,
there were signs of stabilization in the economy during fiscal
2010. Government programs had a positive impact on automobile sales
in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, consumer confidence slighty improved and
the manufacturing sector grew in the third quarter of fiscal
2010.
We
achieved higher consolidated net income in the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2010 compared with the corresponding periods in fiscal
2009. Net income was $394 million and $880 million in the third
quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared with net
losses of $812 million and $375 million in the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2009, respectively. Our favorable results in the
third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, as compared to the same
periods of fiscal 2009, were primarily due to decreases in our interest expense
and provision for credit losses. We also reported lower depreciation
on our operating leases due to improvements in used vehicle values driven
primarily by lower used vehicle supply. These results were
partially offset by a decrease in financing revenues during the third quarter
and first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal
2009. The decrease in our financing revenues in the first nine months
of fiscal 2010 was due to lower earning assets.
Sales of
Toyota and Lexus vehicles have been negatively affected in fiscal 2010 by low
consumer confidence and weak economic conditions. Vehicle sales by
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“TMS”) declined 14% compared to the first nine
months of fiscal 2009. In addition, the overall decrease in the
availability of TMS subvention in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 affected
our finance and insurance volumes and market share. As a result, we
experienced a corresponding decline in net earning assets and financing revenues
in the first nine months of fiscal 2010. Although TMS vehicle sales
declined in the first nine months of fiscal 2010, much of the decline occurred
during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. TMS sales during the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 were higher than sales during the same period of fiscal
2009. Our overall net earning assets balance at December 31, 2009 was
higher than the balance at the end of the first and second quarters of fiscal
2010. The increase in sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 is
attributable to increased marketing incentives and slightly improved consumer
confidence.
Interest
expense was lower during the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010
compared to the same periods of fiscal 2009 primarily due to mark-to-market
gains on a portion of our derivatives portfolio. These gains occurred
due to the relatively flat swap rates during the first nine months of fiscal
2010 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, where we saw a significant
decrease in the swap rates resulting in mark-to-market losses in this portion of
our derivatives portfolio.
Despite
the weak economy and the high unemployment in the United States, our levels of
delinquency and severity have improved. Previous improvements in our
purchasing practices have enhanced the credit quality of our
portfolio. This, combined with the strengthening of our collection
efforts, has led to decreased levels of delinquency during the nine months ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in fiscal
2009. In addition, conditions in the used vehicle market
improved due to lower used vehicle supply during the first nine months of fiscal
2010. This resulted in an improvement in average loss severity per
unit which positively impacted charge-offs. Our provision for credit
losses of $334 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was
significantly lower than the provision of $1,397 million for the corresponding
period in fiscal 2009. Depreciation expense on operating leases has
also been positively affected by improvement in used vehicle
values.
- 48
-
We
continue to focus on further developing sound risk management practices and
credit loss strategies. During fiscal 2010, we dedicated additional
resources to more effectively manage high risk loans in our dealer
portfolio. On an ongoing basis, we review our purchasing practices
and remain focused on leveraging technology to improve our collection
capabilities.
We also
remain focused on our cost structure and have continued to reduce our operating
and administrative expenses. Operating expenses declined by 11%
during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period in the
prior year, primarily in the areas of contingent workforce and
technology.
In
January 2010, TMS announced a recall and a temporary suspension of sales and
production of certain Toyota models. These developments have not
affected our financial results and operations as of and for the period ended
December 31, 2009. Our financial results, however, are dependent on
the level of sales of Toyota and Lexus vehicles. A decrease in sales
will have a negative effect on our financing volume, insurance volume, earning
assets and revenues. In addition, our results are affected by used
vehicle market values. A decrease in such values would have a
negative effect on realized values and return rates, which in turn, could
negatively affect depreciation expense and credit losses. We are
currently implementing programs to assist customers and dealers in response to
the recall and sales suspension.
- 49
-
RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
(dollars
in millions)
|
||||
Net
income (loss):
|
||||
Finance
operations
|
$335
|
($890)
|
$739
|
($495)
|
Insurance
operations
|
59
|
78
|
141
|
120
|
Total
net income (loss)
|
$394
|
($812)
|
$880
|
($375)
|
Our
consolidated net income was $394 million and $880 million for the third quarter
and first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared to net losses of
$812 million and $375 million for the same periods in fiscal 2009. Our favorable
results in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010 as compared to
the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2009 were attributable to a
decrease in our interest expense primarily due to-mark to-market gains on a
portion of our derivatives portfolio, a decrease in our provision for credit
losses and lower depreciation on our operating leases. This was
partially offset by lower financing revenues.
Our
financing operations reported net income of $335 million and $739 million for
the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared
to net losses of $890 million and $495 million for the same periods in fiscal
2009. Our favorable results in the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2010 were due to a decrease in our interest expense and
provision for credit losses. We also reported lower
depreciation on our operating leases due to improvements in used vehicle values
driven primarily by lower used vehicle supply. These results were
partially offset by lower financing revenues.
Our
insurance operations reported net income of $59 million and $141 million for the
third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively compared to $78
million and $120 million for the same periods in fiscal 2009. The decrease in
net income for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period in
the prior year was primarily due to a decrease in investment income and an
increase in insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses. The
increase in net income for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to the
same period in the prior year was primarily due to an increase in insurance
earned premiums and contract revenues.
Our
overall capital position increased by $1.0 billion, bringing total shareholder’s
equity to $5.1 billion at December 31, 2009, compared to $4.1 billion at March
31, 2009. Our debt decreased to $69.2 billion at December 31, 2009
from $73.0 billion at March 31, 2009. As a result of these factors,
our debt-to-equity ratio improved to 13.5 at December 31, 2009 from 17.8 at
March 31, 2009.
- 50
-
Financing
Operations – Fiscal 2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
Three
months ended
|
Percentage
Change
|
Nine
months ended
|
Percentage
Change
|
|||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||
(dollars
in millions)
|
||||||
Financing
Revenues:
|
||||||
Operating
lease
|
$1,179
|
$1,257
|
(6%)
|
$3,550
|
$3,688
|
(4%)
|
Retail
financing1
|
777
|
847
|
(8%)
|
2,348
|
2,510
|
(6%)
|
Dealer
financing
|
76
|
157
|
(52%)
|
239
|
450
|
(47%)
|
Total
financing revenues
|
2,032
|
2,261
|
(10%)
|
6,137
|
6,648
|
(8%)
|
Depreciation
on operating leases
|
897
|
1,078
|
(17%)
|
2,626
|
3,103
|
(15%)
|
Interest
expense
|
440
|
1,832
|
(76%)
|
1,560
|
2,519
|
(38%)
|
Net
financing margin
|
695
|
(649)
|
207%
|
1,951
|
1,026
|
90%
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
(5)
|
670
|
(101%)
|
334
|
1,397
|
(76%)
|
Net
income (loss) from financing operations
|
$335
|
($890)
|
138%
|
$739
|
($495)
|
249%
|
1
Includes direct finance lease revenues.
Our
financing operations reported net income of $335 million and $739 million during
the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to net losses of
$890 million and $495 million for the same periods in fiscal
2009. Our favorable results during the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2010 were due to a decrease in interest expense, a decrease in
our provision for credit losses and lower depreciation on operating
leases. For the first nine months of fiscal 2010, our overall
interest expense was 38 percent lower than the same period in fiscal
2009. This decrease during the third quarter and first nine months of
fiscal 2010 compared to the same periods of fiscal 2009 was primarily due to
mark-to-market gains on a portion of our derivatives portfolio. These
gains occurred due to the relatively flat swap rates during the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, during
which we saw a significant decrease in the swap rates resulting in
mark-to-market losses in this portion of our derivatives portfolio.
Financing
Revenues
Total
financing revenues decreased 10 percent and 8 percent during the third quarter
and first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared to the same periods
in fiscal 2009, due to lower average earning asset levels and lower portfolio
yields. Our financing revenues were influenced during the third
quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010 as compared to the same periods in
fiscal 2009 as follows:
·
|
Operating
lease revenues decreased 6 percent and 4 percent, due to lower average
earning asset balances.
|
·
|
Retail
financing revenues decreased 8 percent and 6 percent, due to lower average
earning asset balances and a decrease in our portfolio
yields.
|
·
|
Dealer
financing revenues decreased 52 percent and 47 percent, due to lower
yields and lower average earning asset
balances.
|
- 51
-
Our total
finance receivables portfolio yield was 6.3 percent for both the third quarter
and first nine months of fiscal 2010, compared to 6.7 percent during the same
periods in fiscal 2009.
Depreciation
Expense
Depreciation
on operating leases decreased 17 percent and 15 percent during the third quarter
and first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to the same periods in fiscal
2009. Improvements in used vehicle values, due primarily to lower
used vehicle supply, resulted in an increase to the estimated end of term
residual values on the existing portfolio. This decreased
depreciation expense on a straight-line basis.
Interest
Expense
Our debt
obligations consist of fixed and floating rate debt denominated in a number of
different currencies. We economically hedge our interest rate and currency risk
inherent in these liabilities by entering into interest rate swaps and
cross-currency interest rate swaps, which effectively convert our obligations on
debt into U.S. dollar denominated 3-month LIBOR-based payments. The
following table summarizes the components of interest expense (dollars in
millions):
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
20083
|
2009
|
20083
|
|
Interest
expense on debt4
|
$553
|
$691
|
$1,783
|
$2,085
|
Interest
expense on pay float swaps1
|
(378)
|
(114)
|
(1,082)
|
(481)
|
Interest
expense on debt, net of pay float swaps
|
175
|
577
|
701
|
1,604
|
Interest
expense on pay fixed swaps
|
352
|
134
|
998
|
548
|
Ineffectiveness
related to hedge accounting derivatives2
|
(19)
|
16
|
(19)
|
23
|
(Gain)
loss on foreign currency transactions
|
(206)
|
(7)
|
1,471
|
(255)
|
Loss
(gain) on currency swaps and forwards 2
|
256
|
(14)
|
(1,400)
|
187
|
Loss
(gain) on other non-hedge accounting derivatives:
|
||||
Pay
float swaps2
|
87
|
(285)
|
220
|
9
|
Pay
fixed swaps2
|
(207)
|
1,409
|
(416)
|
398
|
Total
interest expense4
|
$438
|
$1,830
|
$1,555
|
$2,514
|
1 Includes
both hedge and non-hedge accounting derivatives.
2 Refer
to Note 8 –Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest Expense of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information relating to the credit valuation adjustments for the
periods.
|
3 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
|
4 Excludes
$2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 and $5
million for the nine months ended December 31, 2009
and 2008, of interest on bonds held by our insurance
operations.
|
We
reported interest expense of $438 million and $1,555 million during the third
quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to $1,830 million and
$2,514 million for the same periods in fiscal 2009, respectively. Interest
expense was lower during the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010
compared to the same periods of fiscal 2009 primarily due to mark-to-market
gains on a portion of our derivatives portfolio. These gains occurred
due to the relatively flat swap rates during the first nine months of fiscal
2010 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, where we saw a significant
decrease in the swap rates resulting in mark-to-market losses in this portion of
our derivatives portfolio.
- 52
-
Interest
expense on debt primarily represents interest due on notes and loans payable and
commercial paper, and includes the amortization of debt issue costs, discount
and premium, and basis adjustments. The decrease during the third
quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010 when compared to the same periods
in fiscal 2009 was due to a combination of lower weighted average contractual
interest rates on debt and lower weighted average outstanding balances of total
debt. Interest expense on pay float swaps represents net interest expense on our
interest rate and cross-currency swaps. Interest expense on pay float swaps
decreased due to a significant decline in the 3-month LIBOR rate during the
third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010 as compared to the same
periods in fiscal 2009. As a result, interest expense on debt, net of
pay float swaps, was lower in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal
2010.
We use
pay fixed swaps executed on a portfolio basis to manage our interest rate risk
arising from the mismatch between our fixed-rate U.S. dollar denominated
receivables and floating rate obligations. Pay fixed swaps have a
weighted average life of approximately two to three years; this results in a pay
fixed swaps portfolio that is constantly changing as new swaps are executed at
different rates, and existing swaps mature. Interest on pay fixed swaps
represents net interest on our pay fixed swaps portfolio where we pay a fixed
rate and receive a floating rate based on 3-month LIBOR. During the
third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009, 3-month
LIBOR was generally lower compared to the fixed interest rates at which the swap
contracts were executed, resulting in net interest expense in all periods. Based
on the changes in the composition of our pay fixed swaps portfolio, the
difference between the pay fixed rate and pay float rate was greater in the
third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to the third quarter
and first nine months of fiscal 2009. This resulted in net interest
expense of $352 million and $998 million in the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared to $134 million and $548 million
in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2009.
Ineffectiveness
related to hedge accounting derivatives represents the net difference between
the change in the fair value of the hedged debt and the change in the fair value
of the associated derivative instrument. This amount also includes a credit
valuation adjustment of $3 million gain and $17 million loss for the third
quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared to $16
million gain and $6 million gain for the same periods in fiscal
2009.
Foreign
currency transaction gain or loss relates to foreign currency denominated
transactions for which hedge accounting has not been elected and for which we
are required to revalue the foreign currency denominated transactions at each
balance sheet date. We use currency swaps and forwards to economically hedge
these foreign currency transactions. During the third quarter of
fiscal 2010, the U.S. dollar strengthened relative to certain other currencies
in which our foreign currency transactions are denominated. This resulted in the
recognition of gains in foreign currency transactions which are primarily debt,
and losses in the fair value of currency swaps used to economically hedge these
foreign currency transactions. During the first nine months of fiscal 2010, the
U.S. dollar weakened relative to certain other currencies in which our foreign
currency transactions are denominated. This resulted in the
recognition of losses in foreign currency transactions and gains in the fair
value of currency swaps used to economically hedge these foreign currency
transactions. During the first nine months of fiscal 2009, the U.S. dollar
strengthened relative to certain other currencies in which our foreign currency
transactions are denominated. This resulted in the recognition of gains in
foreign currency transactions which are primarily debt, and losses in the fair
value of currency swaps used to economically hedge these foreign currency
transactions.
During
the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, the losses on pay float
swaps and gains on the pay fixed swaps designated as non-hedge accounting
derivatives were due to relatively flat two year swap rates. During the third
quarter of fiscal 2009, the gains on pay float swaps and losses on the pay fixed
swaps designated as non-hedge accounting derivatives were due to a significant
decrease in two year swap rates.
- 53
-
Insurance
Operations – Fiscal 2010 compared to Fiscal 2009
The
following table summarizes key results of our Insurance Operations (dollars in
millions):
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
||||||||||
December
31,
|
Percentage
Change
|
December
31,
|
Percentage
Change
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||
Agreements
(units in thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Issued
|
268
|
263
|
2%
|
889
|
1,009
|
(12%)
|
|||||
In
force
|
5,214
|
5,157
|
1%
|
5,214
|
5,157
|
1%
|
|||||
Insurance
earned premiums and contract revenues
|
$117
|
$104
|
13%
|
$349
|
$314
|
11%
|
|||||
Investment
and other income
|
56
|
94
|
(40%)
|
129
|
126
|
2%
|
|||||
Gross
revenues from insurance operations
|
$173
|
$198
|
(13%)
|
$478
|
$440
|
9%
|
|||||
Insurance
losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
$51
|
$42
|
21%
|
$164
|
$143
|
15%
|
|||||
Insurance
dealer back-end program expenses
|
$17
|
$20
|
(15%)
|
$52
|
$62
|
(16%)
|
|||||
Net
income from insurance operations
|
$59
|
$78
|
(24%)
|
$141
|
$120
|
18%
|
Agreements
issued increased by 5 thousand units during the third quarter and decreased 120
thousand units during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to the same
periods in fiscal 2009. The decrease in the first nine months of
fiscal 2010 was primarily due to the overall decrease in TMS vehicle
sales.
Our
insurance operations reported net income of $59 million and $141 million for the
third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared to
$78 million and $120 million for the same periods in fiscal 2009. The
decrease in net income from insurance for the third quarter of fiscal 2010
compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily due to a decrease in
investment income and an increase in insurance losses and loss adjustment
expenses. The increase in net income from insurance for the first
nine months of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year was
primarily due to an increase in insurance earned premiums and contract
revenues.
Our
insurance operations reported insurance earned premiums and contract revenues of
$117 million and $349 million for the third quarter and first nine months of
fiscal 2010, respectively, compared to $104 million and $314 million for the
same periods in fiscal 2009. The increase in insurance earned
premiums and contract revenues was primarily due to growth in the number of
agreements in force in specific programs and higher average revenues per
contract.
- 54
-
Our
insurance operations reported investment and other income of $56 million and
$129 million during the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010,
respectively, compared to investment and other income of $94 million and $126
million during the same periods in fiscal 2009. Investment and other
income for our insurance operations consist primarily of investment income on
marketable securities. The decrease in investment and other income
for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period in the prior
year was primarily due to lower interest and dividend income received this
year. The increase in investment and other income for the first nine
months of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year was
primarily due to lower other-than-temporary impairment write-downs and higher
net realized gains from the sale of securities this year. Refer to
“Investment and Other Income” below for a more detailed discussion on our
consolidated investment portfolio.
We
reported $51 million and $164 million of insurance losses and loss adjustment
expenses during the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010,
respectively, compared to $42 million and $143 million during the same periods
in fiscal 2009. The increase in insurance losses and loss adjustment
expenses primarily relates to an increase in frequency of claims paid and an
increase in vehicle service and maintenance claims due to the increase in the
number of agreements in force in specific programs.
Insurance
dealer back-end program expenses are incentives or expense reduction programs we
provide to dealers based on sales volume or underwriting
performance. The 15 percent and 16 percent decrease during the third
quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared to the same
periods in fiscal 2009 was primarily due to a decrease in agreements issued and
a decrease in the federal funds rate used in the computation of certain
payments.
- 55
-
Investment
and Other Income
The following table
summarizes the components of our consolidated investment and other income
(dollars in millions):
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||
Interest
and dividend income on marketable securities
|
$52
|
$86
|
$125
|
$134
|
||
Realized
gains (losses) on marketable securities
|
5
|
(5)
|
-
|
(23)
|
||
Other
income
|
9
|
30
|
46
|
71
|
||
Total
investment and other income
|
$66
|
$111
|
$171
|
$182
|
1 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
The
decrease in interest and dividend income on marketable securities relates
primarily to our insurance operations. We reported net realized gains
on marketable securities of $5 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010
compared to net realized losses of $5 million in the same period of fiscal
2009. We reported net realized losses of $23 million for the nine
months ended in fiscal 2009.
We
reported $9 million and $46 million of other income during the third quarter and
first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared to $30 million and $71
million for the same periods in fiscal 2009, respectively. The
decrease in other income was primarily due to a decrease in interest income on
cash held in excess of our funding needs. This decrease was due to
lower short term interest rates during the third quarter and first nine months
of fiscal 2010 as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009. The
decrease in other income was partially offset by an increase in estimated
interest income from a future tax refund.
.
Provision
for Credit Losses
During
the first nine months of fiscal 2010, economic conditions in the United States
remained weak. Unemployment was high, home values depreciated and
commodity prices fluctuated. While there were signs of stabilization
during fiscal 2010, the current economic environment continues to affect some of
our customers. Previous improvements in our purchasing practices have
enhanced the credit quality of our portfolio. These factors, combined
with the strengthening of our collection efforts, have led to decreased levels
of delinquency during the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared to the
same period in fiscal 2009. We also experienced an improvement in
loss severity per unit resulting from improvements in used vehicle values
primarily due to lower used vehicle supply. This positively affected
charge-offs for the first nine months of fiscal 2010. Net charge-offs
as a percentage of average gross earning assets decreased from 1.28% at December
31, 2008 to 1.01% at December 31, 2009. Our provision for credit
losses of $334 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was lower
compared to $1,397 million for the same period in fiscal 2009. Refer
to “Financial Condition – Credit Risk” for further discussion.
- 56
-
Operating
and Administrative Expenses
The
following table summarizes our operating and administrative expenses (dollars in
millions):
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Percentage
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
Percentage
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
Change
|
2009
|
2008
|
Change
|
||||||
Employee
expenses
|
$89
|
$83
|
7%
|
$239
|
$261
|
(8%)
|
|||||
Operating
expenses
|
86
|
92
|
(7%)
|
252
|
290
|
(13%)
|
|||||
Insurance
dealer back-end program expenses
|
17
|
20
|
(15%)
|
52
|
62
|
(16%)
|
|||||
Total
operating and administrative expenses
|
$192
|
$195
|
(2%)
|
$543
|
$613
|
(11%)
|
Total
operating and administrative expenses decreased 2 percent and 11 percent during
the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, respectively, compared
to the same periods in fiscal 2009 due to organizational focus on reducing
expenditures. The decline in employee-related expenses for the first
nine months of fiscal 2010 primarily reflects lower usage of contingent
workers.
Operating
expenses decreased in various areas, including technology expenditures and
marketing incentives. Included in operating and administrative
expenses are charges allocated by TMS for certain technological and
administrative services provided to TMCC. Refer to Note 14 – Related
Party Transactions of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information.
Insurance
dealer back-end program expenses are incentives or expense reduction programs we
provide to dealers based on sales volume or underwriting
performance. Refer to Insurance Operations for further information on
insurance dealer back-end program expenses.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Our
effective tax rate for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 was 39 percent,
compared with 40 percent during the first nine months of fiscal
2009. Our provision for income taxes was $248 million and $555
million for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010,
respectively, compared to a benefit of $527 million and $251 million for the
same periods in fiscal 2009. This increase in provision is consistent
with the increase in our income before tax for the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2010 compared to the third quarter and first nine months of
fiscal 2009.
- 57
-
FINANCIAL
CONDITION
Vehicle
Financing Volume and Net Earning Assets
The
composition of our vehicle contract volume and market share is summarized
below:
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Percentage
change
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
Percentage
change
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||
TMS
new sales volume1
(units
in thousands):
|
358
|
325
|
10%
|
1,106
|
1,283
|
(14%)
|
Vehicle
financing volume2
|
||||||
New
retail
|
126
|
150
|
(16%)
|
460
|
575
|
(20%)
|
Used
retail
|
63
|
66
|
(5%)
|
220
|
242
|
(9%)
|
Lease
|
71
|
47
|
51%
|
171
|
208
|
(18%)
|
Total
|
260
|
263
|
(1%)
|
851
|
1,025
|
(17%)
|
TMS
subvened vehicle financing volume (units included in the above
table):
|
||||||
New
retail
|
74
|
92
|
(20%)
|
238
|
263
|
(10%)
|
Used
retail
|
8
|
16
|
(50%)
|
30
|
45
|
(33%)
|
Lease
|
60
|
40
|
50%
|
138
|
176
|
(22%)
|
Total
|
142
|
148
|
(4%)
|
406
|
484
|
(16%)
|
Market
share3:
|
||||||
Retail
|
35.1%
|
45.9%
|
41.3%
|
44.2%
|
||
Lease
|
19.8%
|
14.4%
|
15.4%
|
16.1%
|
||
Total
|
54.9%
|
60.3%
|
56.7%
|
60.3%
|
1
Represents total domestic TMS sales of new Toyota and Lexus vehicles
excluding sales under dealer rental car and commercial fleet programs
and sales of a private Toyota distributor. TMS new sales volume
is comprised of approximately 82% Toyota and 18% Lexus vehicles for the
third quarter of fiscal 2010 and 85% Toyota and 15% Lexus vehicles for the
first nine months of fiscal 2010. TMS new sales volume is
comprised of approximately 84% Toyota and 16% Lexus vehicles for the third
quarter of fiscal 2009, and 86% Toyota and 14% Lexus vehicles
for the first nine months of fiscal
2009.
|
2
Total financing volume is comprised of approximately 79% Toyota,
16% Lexus, and 5% non-Toyota/Lexus vehicles for the third quarter of
fiscal 2010 and 80% Toyota, 15% Lexus, and 5% non-Toyota/Lexus vehicles
for the first nine months of fiscal 2010. Total financing volume is
comprised of approximately 79% Toyota, 16% Lexus, and 5% non-Toyota/Lexus
vehicles for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and approximately
79% Toyota, 15% Lexus, and 6% non-Toyota/Lexus vehicles for the first nine
months of fiscal 2009.
|
3
Represents the percentage of total domestic TMS sales of new Toyota and Lexus
vehicles financed by us, excluding non-
Toyota/Lexus
sales, sales under dealer rental car and commercial fleet programs and sales of
a private Toyota distributor.
- 58
-
Vehicle
Financing Volume
Our total
financing volume is acquired primarily from Toyota and Lexus vehicle dealers and
is dependent upon TMS sales volume and subvention. Although sales by
TMS in the first nine months of 2010 declined 14% compared to the first nine
months of fiscal 2009, much of the decline occurred during the first quarter of
fiscal 2010. Sales from TMS during the third quarter of fiscal 2010
increased 10% compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2009. This increase is
attributable to increased marketing incentives and slightly improved consumer
confidence. As a result, our overall net earning assets balance at
December 31, 2009 was higher than the balance at the end of the first and second
quarters of fiscal 2010. However, the overall decline in sales
coupled with the decrease in the availability of TMS subvention in the first
nine months of fiscal 2010 has affected our finance and insurance
volumes. As a result, we experienced a corresponding decline in
overall net earning assets and financing revenues in the first nine months of
fiscal 2010.
Our lease
market share increased in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 due to an increase in
the availability of TMS subvention, marketing incentives and changes in the
interest rate environment. This increase was more than offset by the
decrease in our retail market share, attributable to decreased availability of
TMS subvention on retail contracts during the third quarter of fiscal 2010
compared with the third quarter of fiscal 2009. As a result, our
overall market share for the three months ended December 31, 2009 decreased as
compared to the same period in the prior year.
Our
overall market share for the nine months ended fiscal 2010 declined as compared
with our market share for the same period of fiscal 2009. Our retail
market share decreased in the first nine months of fiscal 2010 due to decreased
availability of TMS subvention on retail contracts and increased competition in
the current year. In addition, lease market share also declined,
attributable to increased competition in fiscal 2010. In fiscal 2009,
competitors had scaled back their leasing programs in response to the market
conditions in the U.S. economy.
- 59
-
The
composition of our net earning assets is summarized below (dollars in
millions):
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
Percentage
Change
|
|
Net
Earning Assets
|
|||
Finance
receivables, net
|
|||
Retail
finance receivables, net1
|
$44,201
|
$43,821
|
1%
|
Dealer
financing, net
|
10,258
|
10,753
|
(5%)
|
Total
finance receivables, net
|
54,459
|
54,574
|
(-%)
|
Investments
in operating leases, net
|
16,971
|
17,980
|
(6%)
|
Net
earning assets
|
$71,430
|
$72,554
|
(2%)
|
Dealer
Financing
(Number
of dealers receiving vehicle wholesale financing)
|
|||
Toyota
and Lexus dealers2
|
954
|
920
|
4%
|
Vehicle
dealers outside of the
Toyota/Lexus
dealer network
|
491
|
519
|
(5%)
|
Total
number of dealers receiving vehicle
wholesale
financing
|
1,445
|
1,439
|
-%
|
Dealer
inventory financed
(units
in thousands)
|
202
|
232
|
(13%)
|
1 Includes
direct finance leases of $313 million and $354 million at December 31, 2009 and
March 31, 2009, respectively.
2 Includes
wholesale and other loan arrangements in which we participate as part of a
syndicate of lenders.
Retail
Financing Volume and Finance Receivables
Our
retail financing volume and market share decreased during the third quarter and
first nine months of fiscal 2010 as compared to the same periods in fiscal
2009. The decrease in the third quarter and first nine months of
fiscal 2010 is attributable to the combination of decreased availability of TMS
subvention on retail contracts and increased competition. The decrease in retail
financing during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 is also due to a decline
in overall TMS sales volume. However, retail finance receivables were
slightly higher at December 31, 2009 compared to March 31, 2009, as the
volume of new vehicles financed exceeded portfolio liquidations during the third
quarter.
Lease
Financing Volume and Earning Assets
Our
vehicle lease financing volume and our lease market share increased in the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal
2009. The increase is due to increased TMS sponsored subvention for
new lease vehicles, marketing incentives and changes in the interest rate
environment. Our lease financing volume and market share for the
first nine months of fiscal 2010, however, decreased as a result of overall
decreased TMS sales and TMS sponsored subvention. Total lease earning
assets, comprised of investments in operating leases, decreased from $18.0
billion at March 31, 2009 to $17.0 billion at December 31, 2009 primarily due to
the overall decline in sales volume.
- 60
-
Dealer
Financing
As of
December 31, 2009, the number of dealer inventory units financed decreased by
13% compared to March 31, 2009. The decline was driven
primarily by decreased TMS sales volume and a corresponding decrease in
inventory levels held by dealers. The number of dealers receiving
financing at December 31, 2009 was relatively consistent with the number of
dealers at March 31, 2009. Dealer financing earning assets decreased
5% to $10.3 billion at December 31, 2009 from $10.8 billion at March 31,
2009.
- 61
-
Residual
Value Risk
The
primary factors affecting our exposure to residual value risk are the levels at
which residual values are established at lease inception, current economic
conditions and outlook, projected market values, and the resulting impact on
vehicle lease return rates and loss severity.
We
periodically review the estimated end of term residual values of leased vehicles
to assess the appropriateness of our carrying values. To the extent
the estimated end of term value of a leased vehicle is lower than the residual
value established at lease inception, the estimated residual value of the leased
vehicle is adjusted downward so that the carrying value at lease end will
approximate the estimated end of term market value. These adjustments
are made over time for operating leases by recording depreciation expense in the
Consolidated Statement of Income. Gains or losses on vehicles sold at
lease termination are also recorded in depreciation expense in the Consolidated
Statement of Income.
Depreciation
on Operating Leases
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Percentage
change
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
Percentage
change
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||
Depreciation
on operating
leases
(dollars in millions)
|
$897
|
$1,078
|
(17%)
|
$2,626
|
$3,103
|
(15%)
|
Average
operating lease units
Outstanding
(in thousands)
|
721
|
763
|
(6%)
|
720
|
745
|
(3%)
|
Depreciation
expense on operating leases decreased to $897
million and $2,626 million for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal
2010, respectively, compared to $1,078 million and $3,103 million for the same
periods in fiscal 2009. The average number of operating leases
outstanding also decreased for those periods. Depreciation expense
was positively affected by improvements in used vehicle
values, driven primarily by lower used vehicle supply, a significant
factor in our estimates of end of term market values on our leased vehicle
portfolio. Although used vehicle values have significantly improved
since the end of fiscal 2009, it is uncertain whether the current level is
sustainable primarily due to the continued uncertainty in the United States
economy.
- 62
-
Credit
Risk
Credit
Loss Experience
During
the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2010, economic conditions in
the United States remained weak. Unemployment was high, home values
depreciated, and commodity prices fluctuated. While there were signs
of stabilization during fiscal 2010, these conditions continue to affect some of
our customers’ ability to make their scheduled payments. Previous
improvements in our purchasing practices have enhanced the credit quality of our
portfolio. This, combined with the strengthening of our collection
efforts, has led to decreased levels of delinquency during the nine months ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. In
addition, our level of net charge-offs for the first nine months of fiscal 2010
improved compared with the same period in the prior year.
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|
Aggregate
balances for accounts 60 or more days past due as a percentage of gross
earning assets1
|
|||
Finance
receivables2
|
0.75%
|
0.67%
|
0.94%
|
Operating
leases2
|
0.65%
|
0.73%
|
0.91%
|
Total
|
0.73%
|
0.68%
|
0.93%
|
Frequency
of occurrence as a percentage of outstanding
contracts
|
2.88%
|
2.56%
|
2.40%
|
Average
loss severity per unit
|
$8,417
|
$9,659
|
$9,496
|
Net
charge-offs as a percentage of average gross earning assets3
|
|||
Finance
receivables
|
1.14%3
|
1.54%
|
1.43%3
|
Operating
leases
|
0.59%3
|
0.86%
|
0.83%3
|
Total
|
1.01%3
|
1.37%
|
1.28%3
|
1
Substantially all retail, direct finance lease, and operating lease
receivables do not involve recourse to the dealer in the event
of
|
customer
default.
2
Includes accounts in bankruptcy and excludes accounts for which vehicles have
been repossessed.
3 Net
charge-off ratios have been annualized using nine month results for the nine
month periods ending December 31, 2009 and
2008.
The level
of credit losses primarily reflects two factors: frequency of occurrence and
loss severity. Frequency of occurrence as a percentage of average
outstanding contracts increased during the third quarter and first nine months
of fiscal 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. The
increase in frequency occurred due to the weakness in the U.S. economy,
specifically the high unemployment and its impact on some of our customers’
ability to make their scheduled payments.
The
increase in frequency, however, was more than offset by the decrease in loss
severity per unit over the same period. The improvement in loss
severity during the first nine months of fiscal 2010 is primarily the result of
improvements in used vehicle values which positively affected charge-offs for
the first nine months of fiscal 2010. Our level of net charge-offs
for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 decreased compared with the same period
in the prior year. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average gross
earning assets decreased from 1.28% at December 31, 2008 to 1.01% at December
31, 2009.
- 63
-
Allowance
for Credit Losses
We
maintain an allowance for credit losses to cover probable losses resulting from
the non-performance of our customers. The determination of the
allowance involves significant assumptions, complex analysis, and management
judgment. The following table provides information related to our allowance for
credit losses and credit loss experience for the three and nine months ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in millions):
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Allowance
for credit losses at beginning of period
|
$1,837
|
$1,048
|
$1,864
|
$729
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
(5)
|
670
|
334
|
1,397
|
Charge-offs,
net of recoveries (“net charge-offs”)1
|
(192)
|
(329)
|
(558)
|
(737)
|
Allowance
for credit losses at end of period
|
$1,640
|
$1,389
|
$1,640
|
$1,389
|
1 Net of recoveries of $29 million and
$95 million for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009, respectively,
and $23 million and
$79 million for the three and
nine months ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
Our
allowance for credit losses is established through a process that estimates
probable losses based upon consistently applied statistical analyses of
portfolio data. This process utilizes delinquency migration analysis, in which
historical delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current
aging of the portfolio, and incorporates current and expected trends and other
relevant factors, including expected loss experience, used vehicle market
conditions, economic conditions, unemployment rates, purchase quality mix,
contract term length and operational factors. This process, along
with management judgment, is used to establish the allowance to cover probable
losses. Deterioration in our expectation of any of these factors
would cause an increase in estimated probable losses.
Our
allowance for credit losses increased 18% to $1,640 million at December 31, 2009
compared to $1,389 million at December 31, 2008. When the economy was
weakening in the United States, particularly during the third and fourth
quarters of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, we substantially increased our
estimates of credit losses to reflect higher delinquencies in the consumer
portfolio and adverse trends in the macroeconomic environment. The
result of these increases is still reflected in our allowance for credit losses
at December 31, 2009.
Despite
the continuing weak economy and high unemployment in the United States, our
levels of delinquency and severity have improved since December 31,
2008. Previous improvements in our purchasing practices have enhanced
the credit quality of our portfolio. These factors, combined with the
strengthening of our collection efforts, have led to decreased levels of
delinquency during the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same
period in fiscal 2009. We also experienced lower loss severity due to
improvements in used vehicle values during the first nine months of fiscal 2010
compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2009, driven primarily by lower used
vehicle supply.
The
continued decrease in automobile sales during the first nine months of fiscal
2010 negatively affected the profitability of some of the dealers within our
financing portfolio, increasing the likelihood of default for certain
dealers. We continue to focus on further developing sound risk
management practices and credit loss strategies. During fiscal 2010,
we dedicated additional resources to more effectively manage high risk loans in
our dealer portfolio.
As a result of all these factors, we
reduced our allowance for credit losses by 11% in the third quarter of fiscal
2010 to $1,640 million from $1,837 million from the second quarter of fiscal
2010.
- 64
-
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
Liquidity
risk is the risk arising from the inability to meet obligations when they come
due. Our liquidity strategy is to maintain the capacity to fund
assets and repay liabilities in a timely and cost-effective manner even in the
event of adverse market conditions. This capacity primarily arises
from our ability to raise funds in the global capital markets as well as our
ability to generate liquidity from our balance sheet. This strategy
has led us to develop a borrowing base that is diversified by market and
geographic distribution, type of security, and investor type, among other
factors. Credit support provided by our indirect parent Toyota
Financial Services Corporation (“TFSC”), and from Toyota Motor Corporation
(“TMC”) to TFSC provides an additional source of liquidity to us, although we do
not rely upon such credit support in our liquidity planning and capital and risk
management.
The
following table summarizes the outstanding components of our funding sources at
carrying value (dollars in millions):
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
Commercial
paper1
|
$17,134
|
$18,027
|
Notes
and loans payable2
|
50,186
|
55,053
|
Carrying
value adjustment3
|
1,858
|
(97)
|
Total
debt
|
$69,178
|
$72,983
|
1
Includes unamortized
premium/discount
|
2
Includes unamortized premium/discount and effects of foreign
currency transaction gains and losses on non-hedged or de-designated notes
and
loans payable which are denominated in foreign
currencies.
|
3
|
Represents
the effects of fair value adjustments to debt in hedging relationships,
accrued redemption premiums, and the unamortized fair value
adjustments
on the hedged item for terminated fair value hedge accounting
relationships.
|
Liquidity
management involves forecasting funding requirements and maintaining sufficient
capacity to meet the needs of our business operations and to account for
unanticipated events. To ensure adequate liquidity through a full range of
potential operating environments and market conditions, we conduct our liquidity
management and business activities in a manner that will preserve and enhance
funding stability, flexibility and diversity. Key components of this operating
strategy include a strong focus on maintaining direct relationships with
wholesale market funding providers and commercial paper investors, and ensuring
the ability to dispose of certain assets when and if conditions
warrant.
We
develop and maintain contingency funding plans to evaluate our liquidity
position under various operating circumstances, allowing us to ensure that we
would be able to operate through a period of stress when access to normal
sources of funding is constrained. The plans project funding requirements during
a potential period of stress, specify and quantify sources of liquidity, and
outline actions and procedures for effectively managing through the problem
period. In addition, we monitor the ratings and credit exposures of the lenders
that participate in our credit facilities to ascertain any issues that may arise
with potential draws on these facilities if that contingency becomes
warranted.
We do not
rely on any single source of funding and may choose to realign our funding
activities depending upon market conditions, relative costs, and other factors.
We believe that our funding sources, combined with operating and investing
activities, provide sufficient liquidity to meet future funding requirements and
business growth. Our funding volume is primarily based on expected net change in
earning assets and debt maturities. The declines in our
financing volume and net earning assets reduced our funding needs and our debt
balance during the nine months ended December 31, 2009.
- 65
-
The
decline in our net earning assets, cash flows generated from our earning asset
portfolio and pre-funding activities conducted during the quarter ended March
31, 2009 reduced term funding requirements for the nine months ended December
31, 2009. This resulted in a higher balance for cash and cash
equivalents and investments in marketable securities at March 31, 2009 compared
to subsequent quarters. In addition, much of the funding requirements
for the first nine months of fiscal 2010 were met by the pre-funding activities
conducted during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. As the cash from
those pre-funding activities was used to meet TMCC’s obligations during the nine
months ended December 31, 2009, cash and cash equivalents declined significantly
at December 31, 2009 as compared to March 31, 2009.
For
liquidity purposes, we hold cash in excess of our immediate funding needs. These
excess funds are invested in short-term, highly liquid and investment grade
money market instruments, which provide liquidity for our short-term funding
needs and flexibility in the use of our other funding sources. We
maintained excess funds ranging from $1.5 billion to $5.9 billion with an
average balance of $4.1 billion for the nine months ended December 31,
2009.
We maintain broad access to a variety of global markets and cost of funding has generally improved during the third quarter of fiscal 2010. We may lend to or borrow from affiliates on terms based upon a number of business factors such as funds availability, cash flow timing, relative cost of funds, and market access capabilities.
The
credit support arrangements provided by our parent also provide an additional
source of liquidity to us, although it is not relied upon in our liquidity
planning and capital and risk management strategies. The credit
support agreement between TMC and TFSC is not a guarantee by TMC of any
securities or obligations of TFSC. TMC’s obligations under the credit
support agreement rank pari passu with its senior unsecured debt
obligations. The agreement is governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the laws of Japan. Refer to the Liquidity and Capital
Resources section of our fiscal 2009 Form 10-K for additional information
regarding the credit support agreement between TMC and TFSC and the credit
support agreement between TFSC and TMCC.
Commercial
Paper
Short-term
funding needs are met through the issuance of commercial paper in the United
States. Commercial paper outstanding under our commercial paper
programs ranged from approximately $10.9 billion to $18.2 billion during the
nine months ended December 31, 2009, with an average outstanding balance of
$14.8 billion. Our commercial paper programs are supported by the
liquidity facilities discussed later in this section. As a commercial
paper issuer with short-term debt ratings of A-1+ by Standard & Poor’s
Ratings Group, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“S&P”), and
P-1 by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), we believe there is ample
capacity to meet our short-term funding requirements.
- 66
-
Notes
and Loans Payable
The
following table summarizes the components of our notes and loans payable at par
value (dollars in millions):
U.S.
medium term notes ("MTNs") and domestic bonds
|
Euro
MTNs ("EMTNs")
|
Eurobonds
|
Other
|
Total
notes and loans payable5
|
|||||
Balance
at March 31, 20091
|
$17,507
|
$32,067
|
$4,071
|
$2,544
|
$56,189
|
||||
Issuances
during the nine months
ended
December 31, 2009
|
1,2262
|
3,4113
|
-
|
3,0364
|
7,673
|
||||
Maturities
and terminations
during
the nine months
ended
December 31, 2009
|
(9,418)
|
(4,275)
|
(438)
|
(260)
|
(14,391)
|
||||
Balance
at December 31, 20091
|
$9,315
|
$31,203
|
$3,633
|
$5,320
|
$49,471
|
||||
Issuances
during the one
month
ended January 31, 2010
|
$1,2002
|
$723
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1,272
|
1
Amounts represent par values and as such exclude unamortized premium/discount,
foreign currency transaction gains and losses
on
debt denominated in foreign currencies, fair value adjustments to debt in hedge
accounting relationships, accrued redemption
premium, and the unamortized fair value adjustments on the hedged item for
terminated hedge accounting relationships. Par
values of non-U.S. currency denominated notes are determined using foreign
exchange rates applicable as of the issuance dates.
2
MTNs and domestic bonds had terms to maturity ranging from approximately 1
year to 3 years, and had interest rates at the time
of issuance ranging from 0.2 percent to 1.9
percent.
|
3 EMTNs
were issued in U.S. and non-U.S. currencies, had terms to maturity ranging from
approximately 2 years to 5 years,
and
had interest rates at the time of issuance ranging from 1.1
percent to 8.0 percent.
4
Primarily consists of long-term borrowings, all with terms to maturity
from approximately 1 year to 5 years, and interest rates as
of December 31, 2009 ranging from 0.1 percent to 1.2
percent.
|
5
Consists of fixed and floating rate debt. Upon the issuance of fixed
rate debt, we generally elect to enter into pay float
interest
rate swaps. Refer to “Derivative Instruments” for further
discussion.
We
maintain a shelf registration statement with the SEC to provide for the issuance
of debt securities in the U.S. capital markets to retail and institutional
investors. We qualify as a well-known seasoned issuer under SEC rules, and as a
result, we may issue under our registration statement an unlimited amount of
debt securities during the three year period ending March 2012. Debt
securities issued under the U.S. shelf registration statement are issued
pursuant to the terms of an indenture which requires TMCC to comply with certain
covenants, including negative pledge provisions. We are in compliance
with these covenants.
Our EMTN
program, shared with our affiliates Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands) B.V.,
Toyota Credit Canada Inc. and Toyota Finance Australia Limited (TMCC and such
affiliates, the “EMTN Issuers”), provides for the issuance of debt securities in
the international capital markets. In September 2009, the EMTN
Issuers renewed the EMTN program for a one year period. The maximum
aggregate principal amount authorized under the EMTN Program to be outstanding
at any time was increased from €40 billion to €50 billion, or the equivalent in
other currencies, of which €22.2 billion was available for issuance at January
31, 2010. The authorized amount is shared among all EMTN
Issuers. The authorized aggregate principal amount under the EMTN
program may be increased from time to time. Debt securities issued
under the EMTN program are issued pursuant to the terms of an agency
agreement. Certain debt securities issued under the EMTN program are
subject to negative pledge provisions. Debt securities issued under
our EMTN program prior to October 2007 are also subject to cross-default
provisions. We are in compliance with these
covenants.
- 67
-
In addition, we may issue other debt
securities or enter into other unsecured financing arrangements through
the international capital markets.
Liquidity
Facilities and Letters of Credit
For
additional liquidity purposes, we maintain syndicated bank credit facilities
with certain banks.
364
Day Credit Agreement
In March
2009, TMCC, its subsidiary Toyota Credit de Puerto Rico Corp. (“TCPR”), and
other Toyota affiliates entered into a $5.0 billion 364 day syndicated bank
credit facility pursuant to a 364 Day Credit Agreement. The ability
to make draws is subject to covenants and conditions customary in a transaction
of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default provisions
and limitations on consolidations, mergers and sales of assets. The
364 Day Credit Agreement may be used for general corporate purposes and was not
drawn upon at December 31 and March 31, 2009.
Five
Year Credit Agreement
In March
2007, TMCC, TCPR, and other Toyota affiliates entered into an $8.0 billion five
year syndicated bank credit facility pursuant to a Five Year Credit Agreement.
The ability to make draws is subject to covenants and conditions customary in a
transaction of this nature, including negative pledge provisions, cross-default
provisions and limitations on consolidations, mergers and sales of
assets. The Five Year Credit Agreement may be used for general
corporate purposes and was not drawn upon at December 31 and March 31,
2009.
Letters
of Credit Facilities Agreement
In
addition, TMCC has uncommitted letters of credit facilities totaling $5 million
at December 31 and March 31, 2009. Of the total credit facilities, $1
million of the uncommitted letters of credit facilities was issued and
outstanding at December 31 and March 31, 2009.
Other
Credit Agreements
TMCC has
two additional bank credit facilities. The first is a 364 day
committed bank credit facility in the amount of JPY 100 billion (approximately
$1.1 billion as of December 31, 2009) which was entered into in December 2009 to
replace a similar facility which expired that month. The second is a
364 day uncommitted bank credit facility in the amount of JPY 100 billion
(approximately $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2009), which was entered into in
December 2008 and extended in December 2009 for an additional 364
days. Both of these agreements contain covenants and conditions
customary in a transaction of this nature, including negative pledge provisions,
cross-default provisions and limitations on consolidations, mergers and sales of
assets. Neither of these facilities was drawn upon at December 31 and
March 31, 2009.
We are in
compliance with the covenants and conditions of the credit agreements described
above.
- 68
-
Securitization
Securitization
of retail finance receivables and closed-end consumer leases provides us with an
alternative source of funding and investor diversification. As of
December 31, 2009, we owned approximately $44.2 billion of potentially
securitizable retail finance receivables and $17.6 billion of closed-end
consumer lease contracts. We maintain a shelf-registration statement
with the SEC which can be used to issue asset-backed securities secured by our
retail finance contracts. During the third quarter and first nine
months of fiscal 2010, we did not execute any securitization
transactions. TMCC will continue to evaluate the market for
asset-backed securities and consider its funding strategies in determining
whether to employ securitization funding in the future.
Credit
Ratings
As of
February 5, 2010, the ratings and outlook established by Moody’s and S&P for
TMCC were as follows:
NRSRO
|
Commercial
Paper
|
Senior
Long-term Debt
|
Outlook
|
|||
S&P
|
A-1+
|
AA1
|
Negative2
|
|||
Moody’s
|
P-1
|
Aa1
|
Negative
|
1
Placed on CreditWatch with negative implications.
2 Represents a long-term
outlook rating.
The cost
and availability of unsecured financing is influenced by credit ratings, which
are intended to be an indicator of the creditworthiness of a particular company,
security, or obligation. Lower ratings generally result in higher
borrowing costs as well as reduced access to capital markets. Credit
ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold securities, and are
subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning nationally
recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”). Each NRSRO may
have different criteria for evaluating risk, and therefore ratings should be
evaluated independently for each NRSRO. Our credit ratings depend in
part on the existence of the credit support agreements of TFSC and
TMC. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors - Credit Support” in our fiscal 2009
Form 10-K.
- 69
-
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
Risk
Management Strategy
We use
derivatives as part of our risk management strategy to hedge against changes in
interest rate and foreign currency risks. We manage these risks by
entering into derivatives transactions with the intent to minimize fluctuations
in earnings, cash flows and fair value adjustments of assets and liabilities
caused by market volatility.
Our
derivative activities are mandated and monitored by our Asset-Liability
Committee (“ALCO”), which provides a framework for financial controls and
governance to manage these market risks. We use internal models to
analyze data from internal and external sources in developing various hedging
strategies. We incorporate the resulting hedging strategies into our
overall risk management strategies.
Our
liabilities consist mainly of fixed and floating rate debt, denominated in a
number of different currencies, which we issue in the global capital
markets. We hedge our interest rate and currency risk inherent in
these liabilities by entering into interest rate swaps and cross-currency swaps,
which effectively convert our obligations into U.S. dollar-denominated, 3-month
LIBOR-based payments.
Our
assets consist primarily of U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate
receivables. Our approach to asset-liability management involves
hedging our risk exposures so that changes in interest rates have a limited
effect on our net interest margin and cash flows. We use swaps and
interest rate caps, executed on a portfolio basis, to manage the interest rate
risk of these assets. The resulting asset liability profile is
consistent with the overall risk management strategy as directed by
ALCO.
We enter
into derivatives for risk management purposes only, and our use of derivatives
is limited to the management of interest rate and foreign currency
risks.
Accounting
for Derivative Instruments
All
derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, taking
into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements
that allow us to settle our net positive and negative positions and offset cash
collateral held with the same counterparty. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives are recorded in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
We
categorize derivatives as those designated for hedge accounting (“hedge
accounting derivatives”) and those that are not designated for hedge accounting
(“non-hedge accounting derivatives”).
We may
also, from time-to-time, issue debt which can be characterized as hybrid
financial instruments. These obligations may meet the definition of an “embedded
derivative”. Refer to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies of the Notes of the Consolidated Financial Statements in our fiscal
2009 Form 10-K, and in Note 8 – Derivatives, Hedging Activities and Interest
Expense in this Form 10-Q for additional information. Changes in the
fair value of the bifurcated embedded derivative or the entire hybrid financial
instrument are reported in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
- 70
-
Derivative
Assets and Liabilities
The
following table summarizes our derivative assets and liabilities, which are
included in other assets and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet
(dollars in millions):
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
||
Derivative
assets
|
$3,346
|
$265
|
|
Less:
Collateral held, net 1, 2,
3
|
2,533
|
96
|
|
Derivative
assets, net of collateral
|
813
|
169
|
|
Less:
Counterparty credit valuation adjustment
|
15
|
18
|
|
Derivative
assets, net of collateral and credit adjustment
|
$798
|
$151
|
|
Embedded
derivative assets
|
$6
|
$24
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
$370
|
$1,262
|
|
Plus:
Collateral (posted) held, net 1,2,
3
|
(5)
|
124
|
|
Derivative
liabilities, net of collateral
|
365
|
1,386
|
|
Less: Our
own non-performance credit valuation adjustment
|
4
|
69
|
|
Derivative
liabilities, net of collateral
and
non-performance credit valuation adjustment
|
$361
|
$1,317
|
|
Embedded
derivative liabilities
|
$36
|
$25
|
1 Represents
cash received or deposited under reciprocal collateral arrangements that we have
entered into with certain
derivative
counterparties. Refer to the “Counterparty Credit Risk” section for more
details.
2
As of December 31, 2009, we held collateral of $2,537 million and posted
collateral of $9 million. We netted $4 million
of collateral posted by a counterparty whose position shifted from a net
liability to a net asset subsequent to the date
collateral was transferred. This resulted in net collateral
held of $2,533 and net collateral posted of $5
million.
|
3
As of March 31, 2009, we
held collateral of $515 million and posted collateral of $295
million. We netted $419 million
of collateral posted
by a counterparty whose position shifted from a net asset to a net
liability subsequent to the date
collateral was
transferred. This resulted in net collateral held of $96 and
net collateral held from counterparties in a net
liability position
of $124 million.
|
The
increase in derivative assets and decrease in derivative liabilities as of
December 31, 2009 compared to March 31, 2009, are primarily the result of the
weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to certain other currencies in which our
currency swaps are denominated. Refer to the “Interest Expense”
section above for further discussion.
- 71
-
Counterparty
Credit Risk
We manage
counterparty credit risk by maintaining policies for entering into derivative
contracts, exercising our rights under our derivative contracts, requiring the
posting of collateral and actively monitoring our exposure to
counterparties.
All of
our derivatives counterparties to which we had credit exposure at December 31,
2009 were assigned investment grade ratings by a NRSRO. In addition,
we require counterparties that are or become rated BBB+ or lower to fully
collateralize their net derivative exposures with us. Our
counterparty credit risk could be adversely affected by deterioration of the
U.S. economy and financial distress in the banking industry.
Our
International Swaps and Derivatives Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreements
contain reciprocal collateral arrangements which help mitigate our exposure to
the credit risk associated with our counterparties. We perform
valuations of our position with each counterparty and transfer cash collateral
on at least a monthly basis. In addition, if either party under an
ISDA Master Agreement, in its reasonable opinion, believes there has been a
material decline in the creditworthiness of the other party, it can call for
more frequent collateral transfers. If the market value of either
counterparty’s net derivatives position exceeds a specified threshold, that
counterparty is required to transfer cash collateral in excess of the threshold
to the other counterparty. Under our ISDA Master Agreements, we are
only obligated to exchange cash collateral. Neither we nor our
counterparties are required to hold the collateral in a segregated
account. Our collateral arrangements include legal right of offset
provisions, pursuant to which collateral amounts are netted against derivative
assets or derivative liabilities, which are included in other assets or other
liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheet.
In
addition, many of our ISDA Master Agreements contain reciprocal ratings triggers
providing either party with an option to terminate the agreement and related
transactions at market value in the event of a ratings downgrade below a
specified threshold. Refer to “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our
fiscal 2009 Form 10-K for further discussion.
A summary
of our net counterparty credit exposure by credit rating (net of collateral
held) is presented below (dollars in millions):
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
Credit
Rating
|
||
AAA
|
$92
|
$-
|
AA
|
322
|
92
|
A
|
399
|
77
|
Total
net counterparty credit exposure
|
$813
|
$169
|
The
increase in net counterparty credit exposure is directly correlated to the
increase in our derivative assets at December 31, 2009 as compared to March 31,
2009. This increase is primarily the result of the weakening of the
U.S. dollar relative to certain other currencies in which our currency swaps are
denominated. Refer to the “Interest Expense” section above for
further discussion.
At
December 31, 2009, we recorded a credit valuation adjustment of $15 million
related to non-performance risk of our counterparties and a credit valuation
adjustment of $4 million on our own non-performance risk. All
derivative credit valuation adjustments are recorded in interest expense in our
Consolidated Statement of Income. Refer to “Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion.
- 72
-
NEW ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
Refer to
Note 1 – Interim Financial Data of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
Guarantees
TMCC has
guaranteed the payments of principal and interest with respect to the bonds of
manufacturing facilities of certain affiliates. Refer to Note 12 -
Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for further discussion.
Lending
Commitments
A
description of our lending commitments is included under “Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” in our fiscal 2009 Form 10-K, as well as above
in Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Indemnification
Refer to
Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for a description of agreements containing indemnification
provisions.
- 73
-
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We have
omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction H(2) of Form
10-Q.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our Chief
Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) evaluated the
effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as of
the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this
evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of December 31, 2009, to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act was recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules, regulations, and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our CEO and CFO, as appropriate,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
During
the third quarter of fiscal 2010, we implemented a new debt and derivative
accounting system. This system represents an improvement in our
internal control over financial reporting as it automates some of the control
processes that were previously performed manually. Other than this
system implementation, there have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the third quarter of fiscal 2010 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
- 74
-
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Various
legal actions, governmental proceedings and other claims are pending or may be
instituted or asserted in the future against us with respect to matters arising
in the ordinary course of business. Certain of these actions are or purport to
be class action suits, seeking sizeable damages and/or changes in our business
operations, policies and practices. Certain of these actions are
similar to suits that have been filed against other financial institutions and
captive finance companies. We perform periodic reviews of pending
claims and actions to determine the probability of adverse verdicts and
resulting amounts of liability. We establish reserves for legal
claims when payments associated with the claims become probable and the costs
can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving legal
claims and associated costs of defense may be substantially higher or lower than
the amounts reserved for these claims. However, based on information
currently available and established reserves, we expect that the ultimate
liability resulting from these claims will not have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial statements. We caution that the eventual
development, outcome and cost of legal proceedings are by their nature uncertain
and subject to many factors, including but not limited to, the discovery of
facts not presently known to us or determinations by judges, juries or other
finders of fact which do not accord with our evaluation of the possible
liability from existing litigation.
Repossession
Class Actions
A
cross-complaint alleging a class action in the Superior Court of California
Stanislaus County, Garcia v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, filed in August
2007, claims that TMCC's post-repossession notice failed to comply with the
Reese-Levering Automobile Sales Finance Act of California
("Reese-Levering"). An additional cross-complaint alleging a class
action in the Superior Court of California San Francisco County, Aquilar and
Smith v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, filed in February 2008, contains
similar allegations claiming that TMCC's post-repossession notices failed to
comply with Reese-Levering. The plaintiffs are seeking injunctive
relief, restitution and/or disgorgement, as well as damages in the Aquilar
matter. In May 2008, the Garcia and Aquilar cases (“Garcia Cases”)
were consolidated in Stanislaus County as they present nearly identical
questions of law and fact. A complaint alleging a class action in the
Superior Court of California San Diego County, McNess v. Toyota Motor Credit
Corporation, filed in September 2008, contains similar allegations claiming that
TMCC’s post-repossession notice failed to comply with
Reese-Levering. An additional complaint alleging a class action in
the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, Smith v. Toyota Motor
Credit Corporation, filed in December 2008, also contains similar allegations
claiming that TMCC’s post repossession notice failed to comply with
Reese-Levering. The plaintiffs in the McNess and Smith cases
are seeking injunctive relief and restitution. The McNess and Smith
cases were consolidated with the Garcia Cases in November 2008 and January 2009,
respectively, as they present nearly identical questions of law and
fact. A First Amended Cross-Complaint and Complaint was subsequently
filed in the Superior Court of California Stanislaus County in February
2009. As the result of a mediation in January 2010, the parties
agreed to settle all of the foregoing matters. The proposed
settlement, for which we have adequately reserved, is subject to final court
approval.
- 75
-
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
In
addition to the other information contained in this report and in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 16, 2009, the following risks may
affect us. If any of these risks occur, our business, financial
condition, or operating results could be adversely affected.
Recent
Events Announced by Toyota Motor Sales Could Affect Our Business, Financial
Condition and Operating Results
In
January 2010, TMS announced a recall and a temporary suspension of sales and
production of certain Toyota models. Because our business is
substantially dependent upon the sale of Toyota and Lexus vehicles, these events
could negatively affect us. A decrease in the level of sales,
including as a result of the quality or perceived quality, safety or reliability
of Toyota and Lexus vehicles, will have a negative impact on the level of our
financing volume, insurance volume, earning assets and revenues. The
credit performance of our dealer and consumer lending portfolios may also be
adversely impacted. In addition, a decline in values of used Toyota
and Lexus vehicles would have a negative effect on realized values and return
rates, which, in turn, could increase depreciation expense and credit
losses. These factors would have a negative effect on our
profitability and financial condition.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
We have
omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction H(2) of Form
10-Q.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
We have
omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction H(2) of Form
10-Q.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY
HOLDERS
We have
omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction H(2) of Form
10-Q.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
See
Exhibit Index on page 78.
- 76
-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT
CORPORATION
|
|
(Registrant)
|
Date: February
5, 2010
|
By /S/ GEORGE E.
BORST
|
George
E. Borst
|
|
President
and
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
Date: February
5, 2010
|
By /S/ CHRIS
BALLINGER
|
Chris
Ballinger
|
|
Group
Vice President and
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
- 77
-
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
Method
of Filing
|
||
3.1(a)
|
Articles
of Incorporation filed with the California Secretary of State on October
4, 1982
|
(1)
|
||
3.1(b)
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation filed with the California
Secretary of State on January 24, 1984
|
(1)
|
||
3.1(c)
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation filed with the California
Secretary of State on January 25, 1985
|
(1)
|
||
3.1(d)
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation filed with the California
Secretary of State on September 6, 1985
|
(1)
|
||
3.1(e)
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation filed with the California
Secretary of State on February 28, 1986
|
(1)
|
||
3.1(f)
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation filed with the California
Secretary of State on December 3, 1986
|
(1)
|
||
3.1(g)
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation filed with the California
Secretary of State on March 9, 1987
|
(1)
|
||
3.1(h)
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation filed with the California
Secretary of State on December 20, 1989
|
(2)
|
||
3.2
|
Bylaws
as amended through December 8, 2000
|
(3)
|
||
4.1(a)
|
Indenture
dated as of August 1, 1991 between TMCC and The Chase Manhattan Bank,
N.A
|
(4)
|
||
4.1(b)
|
First
Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 1, 1991 among TMCC, Bankers
Trust Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A
|
(5)
|
__________
(1)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the same numbered Exhibit filed with our
Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No.
33-22440.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the same numbered Exhibit filed with our Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1989, Commission File number
1-9961.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to the same numbered Exhibit filed with our Report on
Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2000, Commission File
number 1-9961.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1(a), filed with our Registration
Statement on Form S-3, File No.
33-52359.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed with our Current Report on Form
8-K dated October 16, 1991, Commission File No.
1-9961.
|
- 78
-
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
Method
of Filing
|
||
4.1(c)
|
Second
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2004, among TMCC, JPMorgan
Chase Bank (as successor to The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.) and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas (formerly known as Bankers Trust
Company)
|
(6)
|
||
4.2
|
Amended
and Restated Agency Agreement, dated September 18, 2009, among Toyota
Motor Credit Corporation, Toyota Motor Finance (Netherlands), B.V., Toyota
Credit Canada Inc., Toyota Finance Australia Limited, and The Bank of New
York Mellon.
|
(7)
|
||
4.3
|
TMCC
has outstanding certain long-term debt as set forth in Note 10 - Debt of
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Not filed
herein as an exhibit, pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K
under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
is any instrument which defines the rights of holders of such long-term
debt, where the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not
exceed 10 percent of the total assets of TMCC and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. TMCC agrees to furnish copies of all such
instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon
request.
|
|||
12.1
|
Calculation
of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
Filed
Herewith
|
||
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer
|
Filed
Herewith
|
||
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer
|
Filed
Herewith
|
||
32.1
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
Furnished
Herewith
|
||
32.2
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
Furnished
Herewith
|
__________
(6)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1(c) filed with our Registration
Statement on Form S-3, Commission File No.
333-113680.
|
(7)
|
Incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 filed with our Current Report on Form
8-K dated September 18, 2009, Commission File Number
1-9961.
|
- 79
-