Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-12.1 - EXHIBIT 12.1 - RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_12-1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - 906 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_32-1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - 906 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_32-2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - 302 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_31-1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - 302 CERTIFICATION - TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP | exhibit_31-2.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended December 31,
2009
OR
[
] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from _______ to _______
Commission
File Number 1-9961
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
95-3775816
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
19001
S. Western Avenue
Torrance,
California
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
90501
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area
code: (310)
468-1310
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes x No __
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes __ No __
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated
filer __ Accelerated
filer __
Non-accelerated
filer x Smaller
reporting company __
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
__ No x
As of
January 31, 2010, the number of outstanding shares of capital stock, par value
$10,000 per share, of the registrant was 91,500, all of which shares were held
by Toyota Financial Services Americas Corporation.
Reduced
Disclosure Format
The
registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b)
of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure
format.
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q
For the
quarter ended December 31, 2009
INDEX
|
||
Part
I
|
3
|
|
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
|
Consolidated
Statement of Income
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Shareholder’s Equity
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
|
6
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
|
Item
2
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis
|
47
|
Item
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
74
|
Item
4T
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
74
|
Part
II
|
75
|
|
Item
1
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
75
|
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
76
|
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
76
|
Item
3
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
76
|
Item
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
76
|
Item
5
|
Other
Information
|
76
|
Item
6
|
Exhibits
|
76
|
Signatures
|
77
|
|
Exhibit
Index
|
78
|
- 2
-
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME
(Dollars
in millions)
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||
Financing
revenues:
|
|||||||
Operating
lease
|
$1,179
|
$1,257
|
$3,550
|
$3,688
|
|||
Retail
financing
|
778
|
847
|
2,349
|
2,510
|
|||
Dealer
financing
|
80
|
157
|
251
|
450
|
|||
Total
financing revenues
|
2,037
|
2,261
|
6,150
|
6,648
|
|||
Depreciation
on operating leases
|
897
|
1,078
|
2,626
|
3,103
|
|||
Interest
expense
|
438
|
1,830
|
1,555
|
2,514
|
|||
Net
financing revenues
|
702
|
(647)
|
1,969
|
1,031
|
|||
Insurance
earned premiums and contract revenues
|
112
|
104
|
336
|
314
|
|||
Investment
and other income
|
66
|
111
|
171
|
182
|
|||
Net
financing revenues and other revenues
|
880
|
(432)
|
2,476
|
1,527
|
|||
Expenses:
|
|||||||
Provision
for credit losses
|
(5)
|
670
|
334
|
1,397
|
|||
Operating
and administrative
|
192
|
195
|
543
|
613
|
|||
Insurance
losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
51
|
42
|
164
|
143
|
|||
Total
expenses
|
238
|
907
|
1,041
|
2,153
|
|||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
642
|
(1,339)
|
1,435
|
(626)
|
|||
Provision
for (benefit from) income taxes
|
248
|
(527)
|
555
|
(251)
|
|||
Net
income (loss)
|
$394
|
($812)
|
$880
|
($375)
|
|||
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
- 3
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
(Dollars
in millions)
(Unaudited)
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
||
ASSETS
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$4,760
|
$6,298
|
|
Investments
in marketable securities
|
2,618
|
2,187
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
54,459
|
54,574
|
|
Investments
in operating leases, net
|
16,971
|
17,980
|
|
Other
assets
|
2,306
|
2,640
|
|
Total
assets
|
$81,114
|
$83,679
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S
EQUITY
|
|||
Debt
|
$69,178
|
$72,983
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,230
|
2,454
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
3,598
|
4,149
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
76,006
|
79,586
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (See Note 12)
|
|||
Shareholder's
equity:
|
|||
Capital
stock, $10,000 par value (100,000 shares authorized;
|
|||
91,500
issued and outstanding)
|
915
|
915
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
1
|
1
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
72
|
(63)
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
4,120
|
3,240
|
|
Total
shareholder's equity
|
5,108
|
4,093
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholder's equity
|
$81,114
|
$83,679
|
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
- 4
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
(Dollars
in millions)
(Unaudited)
Capital
stock
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income
|
Retained
earnings
|
Total
|
|||||
BALANCE
AT MARCH 31, 2008
|
$915
|
$-
|
$-
|
$3,865
|
$4,780
|
||||
Effects
of accounting change for retirement benefits
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2)
|
(2)
|
||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
||||
Comprehensive
loss activity:
|
|||||||||
Net
loss for the nine months ended December 31, 2008
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(375)
|
(375)
|
||||
Net
unrealized loss on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of tax
benefit of $95 million
|
-
|
-
|
(158)
|
-
|
(158)
|
||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net loss included in net income, net of tax benefit of $1
million
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
||||
Total
comprehensive loss
|
-
|
-
|
(156)
|
(375)
|
(531)
|
||||
BALANCE
AT DECEMBER 31, 2008
|
$915
|
$1
|
($156)
|
$3,488
|
$4,248
|
||||
BALANCE
AT MARCH 31, 2009
|
$915
|
$1
|
($63)
|
$3,240
|
$4,093
|
||||
Net
income for the nine months ended
December
31, 2009
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
880
|
880
|
||||
Net
unrealized gain on available-for-sale marketable securities, net of tax
provision of $78 million
|
-
|
-
|
127
|
-
|
127
|
||||
Reclassification
adjustment for net loss included in net income, net of tax benefit of $5
million
|
-
|
-
|
8
|
-
|
8
|
||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
-
|
-
|
135
|
880
|
1,015
|
||||
BALANCE
AT DECEMBER 31, 2009
|
$915
|
$1
|
$72
|
$4,120
|
$5,108
|
||||
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
- 5
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars
in millions)
(Unaudited)
Nine
months ended December 31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||
Net
income (loss)
|
$880
|
($375)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,714
|
3,209
|
|
Recognition
of deferred income
|
(758)
|
(755)
|
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
334
|
1,397
|
|
Amortization
of deferred origination fees
|
248
|
245
|
|
Fair
value adjustments and amortization of premiums and
discounts
associated with debt, net
|
3,480
|
(2,746)
|
|
Net
(gain) loss from sale of marketable securities
|
(7)
|
16
|
|
Impairment
on marketable securities
|
7
|
7
|
|
Net
change in:
|
|||
Derivative
assets
|
(629)
|
1,031
|
|
Other
assets
|
(142)
|
(201)
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
693
|
(414)
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
(945)
|
480
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
419
|
(227)
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
6,294
|
1,667
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||
Purchase
of investments in marketable securities
|
(880)
|
(1,567)
|
|
Disposition
of investments in marketable securities
|
671
|
1,224
|
|
Acquisition
of finance receivables
|
(15,954)
|
(19,830)
|
|
Collection
of finance receivables
|
15,098
|
15,613
|
|
Net
change in wholesale receivables
|
799
|
218
|
|
Acquisition
of investments in operating leases
|
(5,009)
|
(6,468)
|
|
Disposals
of investments in operating leases
|
3,641
|
3,046
|
|
Advances
to affiliates
|
(1,731)
|
(5,199)
|
|
Repayments
from affiliates
|
2,835
|
4,772
|
|
Other,
net
|
(15)
|
-
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(545)
|
(8,191)
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||
Proceeds
from issuance of debt
|
5,424
|
12,843
|
|
Payments
on debt
|
(13,831)
|
(12,737)
|
|
Net
change in commercial paper
|
(853)
|
8,450
|
|
Net
advances to TFSA (Note 14)
|
-
|
(27)
|
|
Advances
from affiliates (Note 14)
|
2,001
|
-
|
|
Repayments
to affiliates (Note 14)
|
(28)
|
1,679
|
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(7,287)
|
10,208
|
|
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,538)
|
3,684
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
6,298
|
736
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
$4,760
|
$4,420
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures:
|
|||
Interest
paid
|
$1,636
|
$2,069
|
|
Income
taxes (paid) received
|
($9)
|
$22
|
|
Non-cash
financing:
|
|||
Capital
contribution for stock-based compensation
|
$-
|
$1
|
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 6
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 1 – Interim Financial
Data
Basis
of Presentation
The
information furnished in these unaudited interim financial statements for the
three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 has been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
(“U.S. GAAP”). In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial
information reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim
periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine
months ended December 31, 2009 do not necessarily indicate the results that may
be expected for the full year.
These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated
Financial Statements, significant accounting policies, and other notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2009 (“fiscal 2009”), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) on June 16, 2009. References herein to “TMCC”
denote Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, and references herein to “we”, “our”,
and “us” denote Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
In
preparing these financial statements, we have evaluated events and transactions
for potential recognition or disclosure through February 5, 2010, the date the
financial statements were issued.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Investments
in Marketable Securities
Investments
in marketable securities consist of debt and equity securities. Debt
and equity securities designated as available-for-sale (“AFS”) are carried at
fair value using quoted market prices where available with unrealized gains or
losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of applicable
taxes. We use the specific identification method to determine
realized gains and losses related to our investment
portfolio. Realized investment gains and losses are reflected in
Investment and Other Income in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment
We
periodically evaluate unrealized losses on our AFS debt securities portfolio for
other-than-temporary impairment. If we have no intent to sell and we
believe that it is more likely than not we will not be required to sell these
securities prior to recovery, the credit loss component of the unrealized losses
are recognized in earnings, while the remainder of the loss is recognized in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”). The credit loss component
recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not
expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected
using a credit cash flow analysis for debt securities.
We
perform periodic reviews of our AFS equity securities to determine whether
unrealized losses are temporary in nature. If losses are considered
to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to
fair value and the write down is reflected in Investment and Other Income in the
Consolidated Statement of Income.
- 7
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 1 – Interim Financial
Data (Continued)
Reclassifications
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
New
Accounting Guidance
In
January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended the fair
value measurements and disclosure guidance to provide increased disclosures
about transfers of financial assets in and out of Levels 1 and 2. The
new disclosure is effective for us March 31, 2010. Additionally, all
activity in Level 3 must be presented separately. This disclosure is
effective for us March 31, 2011. We do not expect these disclosures
to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that sets forth the
requirements that must be met for a company to recognize revenue from the sale
of a delivered item that is part of a multiple-element arrangement when other
items have not yet been delivered. This accounting guidance is effective for us
on April 1, 2011 and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In
October 2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance that changes the accounting
model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software
elements that function together to deliver the product’s essential
functionality. The accounting guidance more closely reflects the underlying
economics of these transactions. This accounting guidance is effective for us on
April 1, 2011 and we do not expect it to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In June
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires entities to provide
greater transparency about transfers of financial assets and a company’s
continuing involvement in those transferred financial assets. The accounting
guidance also removes the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. This
accounting guidance is effective for us beginning April 1, 2010 and we do not
expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
In June
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which changes the existing
consolidation model for variable interest entities to a new model based on a
qualitative assessment of power and economics. This accounting guidance is
effective for us beginning April 1, 2010 and we do not expect it to have a
material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Guidance
In
January 2010, the FASB issued accounting guidance that addresses the accounting
and reporting for an entity that experiences a decrease in ownership of a
subsidiary, including the deconsolidation of a subsidiary and the exchange of
assets for an equity interest in another entity. This accounting
guidance was effective for us upon issuance, and its adoption did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
In August
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which provided clarification that, in
the absence of a quoted price for a liability, companies may apply methods that
use the quoted price of an investment traded as an asset or other valuation
techniques consistent with the fair-value measurement principle. The adoption of
this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
- 8
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 1 – Interim Financial
Data (Continued)
In June
2009, the FASB issued The
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (the “Codification”) as the single source of
authoritative accounting guidance for public companies. The Codification did not
change generally accepted accounting principles but rather enhanced the way
accounting principles are organized. The Codification was effective for us July
1, 2009 and its adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
In May
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance on subsequent events which requires
companies to address the accounting and disclosure of events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are
available to be issued. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued accounting guidance which requires all companies
to report noncontrolling
interests in subsidiaries as equity in the consolidated financial statements and
to account for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling owners as
equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling interest in the
subsidiary. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
In April
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance requiring disclosure about the method
and significant assumptions used to establish the fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods as well as annual statements. The
adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In April
2009, the FASB issued additional accounting guidance for other-than-temporary
impairments to improve the consistency in the timing of impairment recognition,
as well as provide greater clarity to investors about credit and non-credit
components of impaired debt securities that are not expected to be sold. The
adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In April
2009, the FASB issued accounting guidance which primarily addressed the
measurement of fair value of financial assets and liabilities when there is no
active market or where the price inputs being used could be indicative of
distressed sales. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
- 9
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements
Fair
Value Measurement – Definition and Hierarchy
The
accounting guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. This accounting guidance also establishes a hierarchy for
inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs
by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Fair
value should be based on assumptions that market participants would use,
including a consideration of nonperformance risk. The standard
describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair
value:
Level 1: Quoted
(unadjusted) prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. Examples of
assets currently utilizing Level 1 inputs are most U.S. government securities,
actively exchange-traded equity mutual funds, and money market
funds.
Level 2: Quoted
prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, or inputs that are
observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of
the asset or liability. Examples of assets and liabilities currently
utilizing Level 2 inputs are U.S. government agency securities, corporate bonds,
most mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, private placement investments
in fixed income mutual funds, and most over-the-counter (“OTC”)
derivatives.
Level
3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity may require significant judgment in order to determine the fair
value of the assets and liabilities. Examples of assets and
liabilities currently utilizing Level 3 inputs are structured OTC derivatives
and certain mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.
The use
of observable and unobservable inputs is reflected in the fair value hierarchy
assessment disclosed in the tables within this section. The
availability of observable inputs can vary based upon the financial instrument
and other factors, such as instrument type, market liquidity and other specific
characteristics particular to the financial instrument. To the extent
that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or
unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires additional
judgment by management. The degree of management’s judgment can result in
financial instruments being classified as or transferred to the Level 3
category.
Controls
over Valuation of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
We have
internal controls to ensure the appropriateness of fair value measurements
including validation processes, review of key model inputs, and reconciliation
of period-over-period fluctuations based on changes in key market
inputs. All fair value measurements are subject to
analysis. Review and approval by management is required as part of
the validation processes.
- 10
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Fair
Value Methods
Fair
value is based on quoted market prices, if available. If listed
prices or quotes are not available, fair value is based upon internally
developed models that primarily use as inputs market-based or independently
sourced market parameters. We use prices and inputs that are current
as of the measurement date, including during periods of market
dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the availability of
prices and inputs may be reduced for certain financial
instruments. This condition could result in a financial instrument
being reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level
3.
Valuation
Adjustments
Counterparty Credit Valuation
Adjustments – Adjustments are required when the market price (or
parameter) is not indicative of the credit quality of the
counterparty.
Non-Performance Credit Valuation
Adjustments – Adjustments reflect our own non-performance risk when our
liabilities are measured at fair value.
Liquidity Valuation
Adjustments – Adjustments are necessary when we are unable to observe
prices for a financial instrument due to market illiquidity.
Valuation
Methods
The
following section describes the valuation methodologies used for financial
instruments measured at fair value, key inputs and significant assumptions in
addition to the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the
valuation hierarchy.
Cash Equivalents
Cash
equivalents, consisting of money market instruments, represent highly liquid
investments with maturities of three months or less at
purchase. Generally, quoted market prices are used to determine the
fair value of money market instruments.
Marketable
Securities
The
marketable securities portfolio consists of debt and equity
securities. Where available, we use quoted market prices to measure
fair value for these financial instruments. If quoted prices are not
available, prices for similar assets and matrix pricing models are
used. Some securities may have limited transparency or less
observability; in these situations, fair value may be estimated using various
assumptions such as default rates, loss severity and credit
ratings.
Derivatives
As part
of our risk management strategy, we enter into derivative transactions to
mitigate our interest rate and foreign currency exposures. These
derivative transactions are considered over-the-counter. All of our
derivatives counterparties to which we had credit exposure at December 31, 2009
were assigned investment grade ratings by a nationally recognized statistical
rating organization (“NRSRO”).
- 11
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
We
estimate the fair value of our derivatives using industry standard valuation
models that require observable market inputs, including market prices, yield
curves, credit curves, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, volatilities and
the contractual terms of the derivative instruments. For derivatives
that trade in liquid markets, such as interest rate swaps, model inputs can
generally be verified and do not require significant management
judgment.
Certain
other derivative transactions trade in less liquid markets with limited pricing
information. For such derivatives, key inputs to the valuation
process include quotes from counterparties, and other market data used to
corroborate and adjust values where appropriate. Other market data
includes values obtained from a market participant that serves as a third party
pricing agent. In addition, pricing is validated internally using
valuation models to assess the reasonableness of changes in factors such as
market prices, yield curves, credit curves, interest rates, foreign exchange
rates and volatilities.
Our
derivative fair value measurements consider assumptions about counterparty
credit risk and our own non-performance risk. Generally, we assume
that a valuation that uses the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) curve to
convert future values to present value is appropriate for derivative assets and
liabilities. We consider counterparty credit risk and our own
non-performance risk through credit valuation adjustments. In
situations in which our net position with a derivative counterparty is an asset,
the credit valuation adjustment calculation uses the credit default
probabilities of our derivative counterparties over a particular time
period. In situations in which our net position with a derivative
counterparty is a liability, we use our own credit default probability to
calculate the required non-performance credit valuation
adjustment. We use a relative fair value approach to allocate the
credit valuation adjustments to our derivatives portfolio.
As of
December 31, 2009, we reduced our derivative liabilities in the amount of $4
million to account for our own non-performance risk. Derivative
assets were reduced $15 million to account for counterparty credit
risk.
Finance
Receivables
Our
finance receivables are not carried at fair value on a recurring basis on the
balance sheet, nor are they actively traded. In certain instances,
for finance receivables where there is evidence of impairment we may use an
observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent. The fair values of impaired finance receivables
based on the collateral value or market prices where available are reported at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Additional adjustments may be
considered to reflect current market conditions when estimating fair
value.
Other
Assets
Other
assets consist in part, of a net receivable from a money market mutual fund,
which was adversely affected by the liquidity crisis in the marketplace during
fiscal 2009. Since the net asset value of the money market mutual
fund was no longer publicly available, we used net present value techniques
adjusted for credit and liquidity risks and reported this in other
assets. On March 31, 2009, we considered the money market mutual fund
impaired and recorded a $35 million impairment. The net realizable
value of $26 million was subsequently collected during the nine months ended
December 31, 2009.
- 12
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
The
following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities that were
accounted for at fair value as of December 31, 2009, by level within the fair
value hierarchy (dollars in millions):
Fair
value measurements on a recurring basis
|
|||||
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Counterparty
netting
&
collateral
1
|
Fair
value
|
|
Cash
equivalents
|
$4,508
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$4,508
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||
Debt
instruments:
|
|||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
30
|
25
|
-
|
-
|
55
|
Municipal
debt securities
|
-
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
Foreign
government debt securities
|
-
|
22
|
-
|
-
|
22
|
Corporate
debt securities
|
-
|
85
|
-
|
-
|
85
|
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||
Agency
mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
117
|
-
|
-
|
117
|
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
18
|
-
|
-
|
18
|
Non-agency
commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
25
|
-
|
-
|
25
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
-
|
701
|
-
|
-
|
701
|
Equity
instruments:
|
|||||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
-
|
1,243
|
-
|
-
|
1,243
|
Equity
mutual funds
|
341
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
341
|
Available-for-sale
securities total
|
371
|
2,247
|
-
|
-
|
2,618
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||
Derivative
assets2
|
-
|
4,294
|
179
|
(3,675)
|
798
|
Embedded
derivative assets
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
-
|
6
|
Derivatives
total
|
-
|
4,294
|
185
|
(3,675)
|
804
|
Total
assets 3
|
4,879
|
6,541
|
185
|
(3,675)
|
7,930
|
Derivative
liabilities2
|
-
|
(1,397)
|
(111)
|
1,147
|
(361)
|
Embedded
derivative liabilities
|
-
|
-
|
(36)
|
-
|
(36)
|
Total
liabilities 3
|
-
|
(1,397)
|
(147)
|
1,147
|
(397)
|
Total
net assets and liabilities
|
$4,879
|
$5,144
|
$38
|
($2,528)
|
$7,533
|
|
1 We
have met the accounting guidance for setoff criteria and have elected to
net derivative assets and derivative liabilities and the related
cash collateral received and paid when legally enforceable master netting
agreements exist.
|
|
2 Includes
derivative asset counterparty credit valuation adjustment of $15 million
and derivative liability non-performance credit valuation
adjustment of $4 million. Derivative assets and derivative
liabilities include interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps, foreign
currency
forwards, and interest rate caps.
|
|
3
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their
entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value
measurement.
|
- 13
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
The
following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities that were
accounted for at fair value as of March 31, 2009, by level within the fair value
hierarchy (dollars in millions):
Fair
value measurements on a recurring basis
|
|||||
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Counterparty
netting,
collateral
1
|
Fair
value
|
|
Cash
equivalents
|
$6,129
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$6,129
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||
Debt
instruments:
|
|||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
44
|
27
|
-
|
-
|
71
|
Municipal
debt securities
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
Foreign
government debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Corporate
debt securities
|
-
|
63
|
-
|
-
|
63
|
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||
Agency
mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
114
|
-
|
-
|
114
|
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
37
|
-
|
-
|
37
|
Non-agency
commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
32
|
-
|
-
|
32
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
-
|
376
|
-
|
-
|
376
|
Equity
instruments:
|
|||||
Preferred
stock
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
-
|
1,250
|
-
|
-
|
1,250
|
Equity
mutual funds
|
240
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
240
|
Available-for-sale
securities total
|
285
|
1,902
|
-
|
-
|
2,187
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||
Derivative
assets2
|
-
|
2,020
|
159
|
(2,028)
|
151
|
Embedded
derivative assets
|
-
|
-
|
24
|
-
|
24
|
Derivatives
total
|
-
|
2,020
|
183
|
(2,028)
|
175
|
Total
assets 3
|
6,414
|
3,922
|
183
|
(2,028)
|
8,491
|
Derivative
liabilities2
|
-
|
(2,909)
|
(216)
|
1,808
|
(1,317)
|
Embedded
derivative liabilities
|
-
|
-
|
(25)
|
-
|
(25)
|
Total
liabilities 3
|
-
|
(2,909)
|
(241)
|
1,808
|
(1,342)
|
Total
net assets and liabilities
|
$6,414
|
$1,013
|
($58)
|
($220)
|
$7,149
|
|
1 We
have met the accounting guidance setoff criteria and have elected to net
derivative assets and derivative liabilities and the related cash
collateral received and paid when legally enforceable master netting
agreements exist.
|
|
2 Includes
derivative asset counterparty credit valuation adjustment of $18 million
and derivative liability non-performance credit valuation
adjustment of $69 million. Derivative assets and derivative
liabilities include interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps, foreign
currency forwards, and interest rate
caps.
|
|
3
Financial assets and financial liabilities are classified in their
entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value
measurement.
|
- 14
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
The
determination in classifying a financial instrument within Level 3 of the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors
to the overall fair value measurement. The following tables summarize
the reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (dollars in
millions):
Three
Months Ended December 31, 2009
Fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level
3)
|
|||||||
Fair
value,
October
1,
2009
|
Total
realized
gains/
(losses)2
|
Purchases,
issuances,
and
settlements,
net3
|
Transfers
in
to
Level
3
|
Transfers
out
of
Level
3
|
Total
unrealized gains/ (losses)4
|
Fair
value December 31, 2009
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
Instruments:
|
|||||||
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
$1
|
$-
|
($1)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
1
|
-
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Available-for-sale
securities Total
|
2
|
-
|
(2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||||
Derivative
assets
(liabilities),
net3
|
144
|
(36)
|
49
|
-
|
-
|
(89)
|
68
|
Embedded
derivative
liabilities,
net
|
(29)
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2)
|
(30)
|
Derivatives
total
|
115
|
(35)
|
49
|
-
|
-
|
(91)
|
38
|
Total
net assets (liabilities)1
|
$117
|
($35)
|
$47
|
$-
|
$-
|
($91)
|
$38
|
|
1 Level
3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.1%)
at December 31, 2009.
|
|
2 Realized
gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold;
realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
securities are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired. Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative
contracts when they
mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
|
3 Net
interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in
purchases, issuances and settlements,
net.
|
|
4 Represents
the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in
earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
period. Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income. Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale
securities are recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholder’s Equity.
|
- 15
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Three
Months Ended December 31, 2008
Fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)5
|
|||||||
Fair
value,
October
1,
2008
|
Total
realized
gains/
(losses)2
|
Purchases,
issuances,
and
settlements,
net3
|
Transfers
in
to
Level
3
|
Transfers
out
of
Level
3
|
Total
unrealized gains/ (losses)4
|
Fair
value
December
31,
2008
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
Instruments:
|
|||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
$-
|
$-
|
$2
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$2
|
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Available-for-sale
securities Total
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||||
Derivative
assets
(liabilities),
net 3
|
270
|
(32)
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
124
|
361
|
Embedded
derivative
liabilities,
net
|
20
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(23)
|
(3)
|
Derivatives
Total
|
290
|
(32)
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
101
|
358
|
Other
assets6
|
424
|
-
|
(334)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
Total
net assets (liabilities)1
|
$716
|
($32)
|
($333)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$101
|
$452
|
1 Level
3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.6%)
at December 31, 2008.
|
2 Realized
gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold;
realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
securities are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired. Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative
contracts when they
mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
3 Net
interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases,
issuances and settlements, net.
4 Represents
the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in
earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
period. Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income. Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale
securities are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholder’s Equity.
|
5 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
6 Represents
a money market mutual fund balance excluding the credit and liquidity valuation
adjustments of $2 million.
- 16
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Nine
months ended December 31, 2009
Fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)5
|
|||||||
Fair
value,
April
1,
2009
|
Total
realized
gains/
(losses)2
|
Purchases,
issuances,
and
settlements,
net3
|
Transfers
in
to
Level
3
|
Transfers
out
of
Level
3
|
Total
unrealized gains/ (losses)4
|
Fair
value
December
31,
2009
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
Instruments:
|
|||||||
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1
|
($1)
|
$-
|
$-
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Available-for-sale
securities Total
|
-
|
-
|
(1)
|
2
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||||
Derivative
assets
(liabilities),
net 3
|
(57)
|
(132)
|
146
|
-
|
(10)
|
121
|
68
|
Embedded
derivative
liabilities,
net
|
(1)
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(28)
|
(30)
|
Derivatives
Total
|
(58)
|
(133)
|
146
|
-
|
(10)
|
93
|
38
|
Total
net assets (liabilities)1
|
($58)
|
($133)
|
$145
|
$2
|
($11)
|
$93
|
$38
|
1 Level
3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.1%)
at December 31, 2009.
|
2 Realized
gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold;
realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
securities are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired. Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative
contracts when they
mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
3 Net
interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases,
issuances and settlements, net.
4 Represents
the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in
earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
period. Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Unrealized
gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholder’s Equity.
|
5 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 17
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Nine
months ended December 31, 2008
Fair
value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)5
|
|||||||
Fair
value,
April
1,
2008
|
Total
realized
gains/
(losses)2
|
Purchases,
issuances,
and
settlements,
net3
|
Transfers
in
to
Level
3
|
Transfers
out
of
Level
3
|
Total
unrealized gains/ (losses)4
|
Fair
value December 31, 2008
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
Instruments:
|
|||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
$-
|
$-
|
$2
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$2
|
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Asset-backed
securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Available-for-sale
securities Total
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||||
Derivative
assets
(liabilities),
net 3
|
295
|
(122)
|
21
|
293
|
-
|
(126)
|
361
|
Embedded
derivative
liabilities,
net
|
(40)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
37
|
(3)
|
Derivatives
Total
|
255
|
(122)
|
21
|
293
|
-
|
(89)
|
358
|
Other
assets6
|
-
|
-
|
(334)
|
424
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
Total
net assets (liabilities)1
|
$255
|
($122)
|
($311)
|
$719
|
$-
|
($89)
|
$452
|
1 Level
3 recurring assets, as a percentage of total assets, were less than (0.6%)
at December 31, 2008.
|
2 Realized
gains and losses may occur when available-for-sale securities are sold;
realized losses may also occur when available-for-sale
securities are considered other-than-temporarily
impaired. Realized gains and losses may occur on derivative
contracts when they
mature or are called or terminated early, and are recorded in interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
3 Net
interest receipts or payments on derivative contracts are shown in purchases,
issuances and settlements, net.
4 Represents
the amount of unrealized gains or losses for the period included in
earnings and/or accumulated other comprehensive
income that is attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses
for assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 at the end of the
period. Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as either an unrealized gain or loss in
interest
expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Unrealized
gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of
Shareholder’s Equity.
|
5 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
6 Represents
a money market mutual fund balance excluding the credit and liquidity valuation
adjustments of $2 million.
- 18
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Assets
Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
For each
major category of assets, we disclose the fair value on a nonrecurring basis and
any changes in fair value during the reporting period. Certain assets
are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis but are subject to fair
value adjustments only in certain circumstances, for example, when there is
evidence of impairment. These assets include impaired finance
receivables and a receivable from a money market mutual fund.
The
following tables present the financial instruments carried on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet by caption and by level within the valuation hierarchy for which a
nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded during the reporting period
(dollars in millions):
Fair
value measurements on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2009:
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
fair value
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
$-
|
$-
|
$177
|
$177
|
Other
assets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
|
$-
|
$-
|
$177
|
$177
|
Fair
value measurements on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2009:
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
fair value
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
$-
|
$-
|
$237
|
$237
|
Other
assets
|
-
|
-
|
26
|
26
|
Total
assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
|
$-
|
$-
|
$263
|
$263
|
Nonrecurring
Fair Value Changes
The
following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for
which a fair value adjustment has been included in the Consolidated Statement of
Income (dollars in millions):
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
($32)
|
($7)
|
($49)
|
($13)
|
- 19
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 2 – Fair Value
Measurements (Continued)
Significant
Changes to Level 3 Assets during the Period
Level 3
net assets reported at fair value on a recurring basis decreased by $79 million
and increased by $96 million for the three and nine months ended December 31,
2009, respectively. The decrease for the three months ended December
31, 2009 is primarily attributable to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar
relative to other major currencies in our portfolio. For the nine
months ended December 31, 2009, the fair value of foreign exchange derivatives
has appreciated because the U.S. dollar has continued to weaken relative to
other major currencies in our portfolio.
Finance
receivables, net reflect impaired loans in our dealer credit
portfolio. We recognized $32 million and $49 million of impairment
losses for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 where impairment is
based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. The $26 million
impaired balance of our money market mutual fund recorded in other assets was
fully repaid as of December 31, 2009.
- 20
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 3 - Fair Value of
Financial Instruments
The
accounting guidance for the fair value of financial instruments requires
disclosures of the estimated fair value of certain financial instruments and the
methods and significant assumptions used to estimate their fair
value. Financial instruments that are within the scope of this
accounting guidance are included in the table below. The accounting
guidance does not require disclosure of the fair value of certain financial
instruments such as lease financing arrangements and nonfinancial instruments,
including goodwill and intangible assets.
The
following is a description of financial instruments for which the ending
balances as of December 31, 2009 are not carried at fair value in their entirety
on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Commercial
Paper
These
instruments are carried at amounts that approximate fair value due to their
short duration and generally negligible credit risk. Our commercial
paper issuances expose us primarily to interest rate risk. Where
available, quoted market prices are used to value commercial paper.
Finance
Receivables
Fair
value of finance receivables is generally determined by projecting expected cash
flows and discounting those cash flows using a rate reflective of current market
conditions. We estimate cash flows expected to be collected using
contractual principal and interest cash flows adjusted for specific factors,
such as prepayments, default rates, loss severity, credit scores, and collateral
type. These estimated cash flows are discounted at quoted secondary
market rates if available, or estimated market rates that incorporate
management’s best estimate of investor assumptions about the
portfolio.
Debt
We use
quoted market prices for debt when available. When quoted market
prices are not available, fair value is estimated based on current market rates
and credit spreads for debt with similar maturities.
The
carrying value and estimated fair value of certain financial instruments were as
follows (dollars in millions):
December
31, 2009
|
March
31, 2009
|
|||
Carrying
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
Carrying
Value
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Financial
assets
|
||||
Finance
receivables, net1
|
$54,115
|
$55,457
|
$54,165
|
$53,838
|
Financial
liabilities
|
||||
Commercial
paper
|
$17,134
|
$17,134
|
$18,027
|
$18,027
|
Term
debt2
|
$52,044
|
$50,321
|
$54,956
|
$55,101
|
|
1 Finance
receivables are presented net of allowance for credit losses. Amounts
exclude related party transactions and direct finance leases.
|
|
2 Carrying
value of term debt represents the sum of notes and loans payable and
carrying value adjustment. Amount includes $4.1 billion and
$2.0 billion of loans payable to affiliates at December 31 and March 31,
2009, respectively, that are carried at amounts that approximate fair
value.
|
- 21
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities
We
classify all of our investments in marketable securities as
available-for-sale. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of
investments in marketable securities and related unrealized gains and losses
were as follows (dollars in millions):
December
31, 2009
|
|||||||
Amortized
cost
|
Unrealized
gains
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value1
|
||||
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
instruments:
|
|||||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
$56
|
$-
|
($1)
|
$55
|
|||
Municipal
debt securities
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
|||
Foreign
government debt securities
|
22
|
-
|
-
|
22
|
|||
Corporate
debt securities
|
79
|
6
|
-
|
85
|
|||
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||||
U.S.
government agency
|
113
|
4
|
-
|
117
|
|||
Non-agency
residential
|
15
|
3
|
-
|
18
|
|||
Non-agency
commercial
|
23
|
2
|
-
|
25
|
|||
Asset-backed
securities
|
695
|
7
|
(1)
|
701
|
|||
Equity
instruments:
|
|||||||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
1,236
|
42
|
(35)
|
1,243
|
|||
Equity
mutual funds
|
251
|
90
|
-
|
341
|
|||
Total
investments in marketable securities
|
$2,501
|
$154
|
($37)
|
$2,618
|
March
31, 20092
|
|||||||
Amortized
cost
|
Unrealized
gains
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value1
|
||||
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|||||||
Debt
instruments:
|
|||||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
$70
|
$2
|
($1)
|
$71
|
|||
Municipal
debt securities
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
|||
Foreign
government debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||
Corporate
debt securities
|
64
|
1
|
(2)
|
63
|
|||
Mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||||
U.S.
government agency
|
110
|
4
|
-
|
114
|
|||
Non-agency
residential
|
45
|
1
|
(9)
|
37
|
|||
Non-agency
commercial
|
33
|
1
|
(2)
|
32
|
|||
Asset-backed
securities
|
384
|
-
|
(8)
|
376
|
|||
Equity
instruments:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
|||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
1,334
|
8
|
(92)
|
1,250
|
|||
Equity
mutual funds
|
245
|
-
|
(5)
|
240
|
|||
Total
investments in marketable securities
|
$2,289
|
$17
|
($119)
|
$2,187
|
1
Includes $41 million and $54 million of securities with subprime exposure at
December 31 and March 31, 2009,
respectively.
2 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 22
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities (Continued)
Other-Than-Temporarily
Impaired Securities
In April
2009, the FASB amended the other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) model for
debt securities. The impairment model for equity securities was not affected.
Under the revised accounting guidance, an OTTI loss with respect to debt
securities must be recognized in earnings if we have the intent to sell the debt
security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt
security before recovery of its amortized cost basis.
OTTI
Evaluation
An
unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is
less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are
determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI in the Consolidated
Statement of Shareholder’s Equity. We conduct periodic reviews of
securities in unrealized loss positions for the purpose of evaluating whether
the impairment is other-than-temporary.
As part
of our ongoing assessment of OTTI, we consider a variety of
factors. Such factors include the length of time and extent to which
the market value has been less than cost, adverse conditions specifically
related to the industry, geographic area or financial condition of the issuer or
underlying collateral of the security, the volatility of the fair value changes,
and changes to the fair value after the balance sheet date.
For
equity securities, we also consider our intent and ability to hold the equity
security for a period of time sufficient for recovery of fair
value. Where we lack that intent or ability, the equity security’s
decline in fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary and is recorded in
earnings.
For debt
securities, we also consider the factors identified
previously. However, for debt securities that we do not intend to
sell or with respect to which it is more likely than not that we will not be
required to sell, we also evaluate expected cash flows to be received to
determine whether a credit loss has occurred. In the event of a
credit loss, only the amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is
recognized in earnings. Amounts relating to factors other than credit losses are
recorded in AOCI. For debt securities that we intend to sell, the
OTTI loss is recorded in earnings.
OTTI
Recognition and Measurement
In April
2009, we adopted the new accounting guidance for OTTI and did not record a
transition adjustment for securities held at March 31, 2009 that were
previously considered other-than-temporarily impaired as we intend to sell or
believe it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the
securities for which we had previously recognized OTTI.
As of
December 31, 2009, AFS debt securities that were identified as
other-than-temporarily impaired were written down to their current fair
value. For debt securities that we intend to sell or that we believe
it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell prior to recovery,
an OTTI loss was recognized in earnings. There were no credit losses
on impaired debt securities. Additionally, there were no AFS equity
securities deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, and therefore, all
unrealized losses on AFS equity securities were recognized in AOCI.
- 23
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities (Continued)
The
following table presents other-than-temporary impairment losses that are
included in realized losses (dollars in millions):
Three
months ended
December
31, 2009
|
Nine
months ended
December
31, 2009
|
|
Total
other-than-temporary impairment losses
|
$1
|
$7
|
Less:
Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income (pretax)1
|
-
|
-
|
Net
impairment losses recognized in income2
|
$1
|
$7
|
1 Represents the non-credit component
impact of the other-than-temporary impairment on AFS debt
securities.
2 Represents the
other-than-temporary impairment on AFS debt securities included in
Investment and Other Income in
the Consolidated Statement of
Income.
|
Unrealized
Losses on Securities
At
December 31, 2009, the fair value and total gross unrealized loss of investments
that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 consecutive
months or more were $286 million and $33 million, respectively. These
investments are comprised of private placement fixed income mutual funds. These
securities are predominately investment grade.
We
evaluated investment securities with fair values less than amortized cost and
have determined that the decline in value is temporary and is primarily a result
of liquidity conditions in the current market environment and not from concerns
regarding the credit of the issuers or underlying collateral. We
believe it is probable that we will recover our investments, given the current
levels of collateral and credit enhancements that exist to protect the
investments. Accordingly, we have not recognized any
other-than-temporary-impairment for these securities.
- 24
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities (Continued)
The
following tables present the aging of fair value and gross unrealized losses for
AFS securities (dollars in millions):
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
|
12
months or more
|
Total
|
|||||
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
|||
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
||||||||
Debt
instruments:
|
||||||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
$34
|
($1)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$34
|
($1)
|
||
Asset-backed
securities
|
347
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
347
|
(1)
|
||
Equity
Instruments:
|
||||||||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
80
|
(2)
|
286
|
(33)
|
366
|
(35)
|
||
Total
investments in marketable securities
|
$461
|
($4)
|
$286
|
($33)
|
$747
|
($37)
|
March
31, 20091
|
||||||||
Less
than 12 months
|
|
12
months or more
|
Total
|
|||||
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
Fair
value
|
Unrealized
losses
|
|||
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
||||||||
Debt
instruments:
|
||||||||
U.S.
government and agency obligations
|
$11
|
($1)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$11
|
($1)
|
||
Corporate
debt securities
|
24
|
(1)
|
4
|
(1)
|
28
|
(2)
|
||
Non-agency
residential mortgage-backed securities
|
18
|
(5)
|
10
|
(4)
|
28
|
(9)
|
||
Non-agency
commercial mortgage-backed securities
|
20
|
(2)
|
2
|
-
|
22
|
(2)
|
||
Asset-backed
securities
|
285
|
(6)
|
89
|
(2)
|
374
|
(8)
|
||
Equity
instruments:
|
||||||||
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
1,030
|
(81)
|
86
|
(11)
|
1,116
|
(92)
|
||
Equity
mutual funds
|
240
|
(5)
|
-
|
-
|
240
|
(5)
|
||
Total
investments in marketable securities
|
$1,628
|
($101)
|
$191
|
($18)
|
$1,819
|
($119)
|
1 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 25
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 4 – Investments in
Marketable Securities (Continued)
The
following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of marketable
securities available-for-sale by contractual maturity dates as of December 31,
2009 (dollars in millions).
Available-for-Sale
Securities:
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Fair
value
|
|
Within
one year
|
$82
|
$82
|
|
After
one year through five years
|
659
|
669
|
|
After
five years through ten years
|
95
|
97
|
|
After
ten years
|
178
|
186
|
|
Fixed
income mutual funds
|
1,236
|
1,243
|
|
Equity
mutual funds
|
251
|
341
|
|
Total
|
$2,501
|
$2,618
|
- 26
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 5 – Finance
Receivables, Net
Finance
receivables, net consisted of the following (dollars in millions):
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
||
2009
|
2009
|
||
Retail
receivables1
|
$45,534
|
$45,312
|
|
Dealer
financing
|
10,479
|
10,939
|
|
56,013
|
56,251
|
||
Deferred
origination costs
|
670
|
709
|
|
Unearned
income
|
(814)
|
(821)
|
|
Allowance
for credit losses
|
|||
Retail
receivables
|
(1,187)
|
(1,375)
|
|
Dealer
financing
|
(223)
|
(190)
|
|
Total
allowance for credit losses
|
(1,410)
|
(1,565)
|
|
Finance
receivables, net
|
$54,459
|
$54,574
|
1
Includes direct finance lease receivables of $345 million and $388
million at December 31 and March 31, 2009, respectively.
The
tables below summarize information about impaired finance receivables (dollars
in millions):
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
||
2009
|
2009
|
||
Impaired
account balances with an allowance
|
$288
|
$266
|
|
Impaired
account balances without an allowance
|
2
|
35
|
|
Total
impaired account balances
|
290
|
301
|
|
Allowance
for credit losses
|
(113)
|
(64)
|
|
Impaired
account balances, net
|
$177
|
$237
|
Impaired
finance receivables primarily consist of dealer financing accounts for which an
allowance has been recorded based on the fair value of the underlying
collateral. For those impaired finance receivables for which the fair
value of the underlying collateral was in excess of the outstanding balance, no
allowance was provided.
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Average
balance of accounts during the period that were impaired as of December
31
|
$327
|
$55
|
$386
|
$58
|
Interest
income recognized on impaired account balances during the
period
|
$2
|
$-
|
$6
|
$-
|
- 27
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 6 – Investments in
Operating Leases, Net
Investments
in operating leases, net consisted of the following at the dates indicated
(dollars in millions):
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
|
2009
|
20091
|
|
Vehicles
|
$23,210
|
$24,332
|
Equipment
and other
|
837
|
884
|
24,047
|
25,216
|
|
Deferred
origination fees
|
(116)
|
(92)
|
Deferred
income
|
(563)
|
(523)
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(6,167)
|
(6,322)
|
Allowance
for credit losses
|
(230)
|
(299)
|
Investments
in operating leases, net
|
$16,971
|
$17,980
|
|
1
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
period presentation.
|
- 28
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 7 – Allowance for
Credit Losses
The
following table provides information related to our allowance for credit losses
on finance receivables and investments in operating leases (dollars in
millions):
Three
months ended
December
31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Allowance
for credit losses at beginning of period
|
$1,837
|
$1,048
|
$1,864
|
$729
|
Provision
for credit losses
|
(5)
|
670
|
334
|
1,397
|
Charge-offs,
net of recoveries1
|
(192)
|
(329)
|
(558)
|
(737)
|
Allowance
for credit losses at end of period
|
$1,640
|
$1,389
|
$1,640
|
$1,389
|
December
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
|
Aggregate
balances 60 or more days past due
|
||
Finance
receivables2
|
$419
|
$562
|
Operating
leases2
|
111
|
175
|
Total
|
$530
|
$737
|
1
Net of recoveries of
$29 million and $95 million for the three and nine months ended December
31, 2009, respectively, and $23 million and
$79 million for the three
and nine months ended December 31, 2008,
respectively.
|
2 Includes accounts in bankruptcy and
excludes accounts for which vehicles have been
repossessed.
- 29
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense
Derivative
Instruments
We use
derivatives as part of our risk management strategy to hedge against changes in
interest rate and foreign currency risks. We manage these risks by
entering into derivatives transactions with the intent to minimize fluctuations
in earnings, cash flows and fair value adjustments of assets and liabilities
caused by market volatility.
Our
derivative activities are monitored by our Asset-Liability Committee (“ALCO”),
which provides a framework for financial controls and governance to manage these
market risks. We use internal financial models to analyze data from
internal and external sources in developing various hedging
strategies. We incorporate the resulting hedging strategies into our
overall risk management strategies.
Our
liabilities consist mainly of fixed and floating rate debt, denominated in a
number of different currencies, which we issue in the global capital
markets. We hedge our interest rate and currency risk inherent in
these liabilities by entering into interest rate swaps and cross-currency swaps,
which effectively convert our obligations into U.S. dollar-denominated, 3-month
LIBOR-based payments.
Our
assets consist primarily of U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate
receivables. Our approach to asset-liability management involves
hedging our risk exposures so that changes in interest rates have a limited
effect on our net interest margin and cash flows. We use swaps and
interest rate caps, executed on a portfolio basis, to manage interest rate
risk. The resulting asset liability profile is consistent with the
overall risk management strategy as directed by ALCO.
We enter
into derivatives for risk management purposes only, and our use of derivatives
is limited to the management of interest rate and foreign currency
risks.
Credit
Risk Related Contingent Features
Certain
of our derivative contracts are governed by International Swaps and Derivatives
Association (“ISDA”) Master Agreements. Substantially all of these
ISDA Master Agreements contain reciprocal ratings triggers providing either
party with an option to terminate the agreement at market value in the event of
a ratings downgrade of the other party below a specified
threshold. In addition, upon specified downgrades in a party’s credit
ratings, the threshold at which that party would be required to post collateral
to the other party would be lowered.
The
aggregate fair value of derivative instruments that contain credit risk related
contingent features that are in a net liability position at December 31, 2009
was $366 million. In the normal course of business, we posted collateral of $5
million at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2009, if our ratings
would have declined to “A+” as rated by S&P or “A1” as rated by Moody’s, we
would have been required to post $67 million of additional collateral to the
counterparties with which we were in a net liability position at December 31,
2009. If our ratings would have declined to “BBB+” or below as rated
by S&P or “Baa1” or below as rated by Moody’s, we would have been required
to post collateral totaling $366 million to the counterparties with which we
were in a net liability position at December 31, 2009. This is the
same amount we would need in order to settle all instruments that were in a net
liability position at December 31, 2009.
- 30
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)
Derivative
Activity Impact on Financial Statements
The table
below shows the location and amount of derivatives at December 31, 2009 as
reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (dollars in millions):
Hedge
accounting derivatives
|
Non-hedge
accounting
derivatives
|
Total
|
|||||||
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
||||
Other
assets
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$505
|
$47
|
$11,957
|
$309
|
$12,462
|
$356
|
|||
Foreign
currency swaps
|
10,611
|
2,111
|
13,800
|
2,006
|
24,411
|
4,117
|
|||
Embedded
derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
78
|
6
|
78
|
6
|
|||
Total
|
$11,116
|
$2,158
|
$25,835
|
$2,321
|
$36,951
|
$4,479
|
|||
Counterparty
netting
|
(1,142)
|
||||||||
Collateral
held1
|
(2,533)
|
||||||||
Carrying
value of derivative contracts – Other assets
|
$804
|
||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$36
|
$-
|
$55,204
|
($1,208)
|
$55,240
|
($1,208)
|
|||
Foreign
currency swaps
|
4,544
|
(205)
|
2,184
|
(91)
|
6,728
|
(296)
|
|||
Foreign
currency forwards
|
-
|
-
|
69
|
(2)
|
69
|
(2)
|
|||
Interest
rate caps
|
-
|
-
|
210
|
(2)
|
210
|
(2)
|
|||
Embedded
derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
371
|
(36)
|
371
|
(36)
|
|||
Total
|
$4,580
|
($205)
|
$58,038
|
($1,339)
|
$62,618
|
($1,544)
|
|||
Counterparty
Netting
|
1,142
|
||||||||
Collateral
posted1
|
5
|
||||||||
Carrying
value of derivative contracts – Other liabilities
|
($397)
|
1 As of December 31, 2009, we held
collateral of $2,537 million and posted collateral of $9
million. We netted $4 million of collateral posted by
a counterparty whose
position shifted from a net liability to a net asset subsequent to the
date collateral was transferred. This resulted in
net collateral held
of $2,533 and net collateral posted of $5 million.
|
- 31
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)
The table
below shows the location and amount of derivatives at March 31, 2009 as reported
in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (dollars in millions):
Hedge
accounting derivatives
|
Non-hedge
accounting derivatives
|
Total
|
|||||||
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
Notional2
|
Fair
value
|
Notional
|
Fair
value
|
||||
Other
assets
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$962
|
$90
|
$14,393
|
$528
|
$15,355
|
$618
|
|||
Foreign
currency swaps
|
8,328
|
1,116
|
8,007
|
411
|
16,335
|
1,527
|
|||
Foreign
currency forwards
|
-
|
-
|
1,171
|
34
|
1,171
|
34
|
|||
Interest
rate caps
|
-
|
-
|
160
|
-
|
160
|
-
|
|||
Embedded
derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
293
|
24
|
293
|
24
|
|||
Total
|
$9,290
|
$1,206
|
$24,024
|
$997
|
$33,314
|
$2,203
|
|||
Counterparty
Netting
|
(1,932)
|
||||||||
Collateral
held1
|
(96)
|
||||||||
Carrying
value of derivative contracts – Other assets
|
$175
|
||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
|||||||||
Interest
rate swaps
|
$-
|
$-
|
$59,447
|
($1,535)
|
$59,447
|
($1,535)
|
|||
Foreign
currency swaps
|
10,028
|
(1,289)
|
3,831
|
(301)
|
13,859
|
(1,590)
|
|||
Foreign
currency forwards
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
-
|
90
|
-
|
|||
Embedded
derivatives
|
-
|
-
|
538
|
(25)
|
538
|
(25)
|
|||
Total
|
$10,028
|
($1,289)
|
$63,906
|
($1,861)
|
$73,934
|
($3,150)
|
|||
Counterparty
Netting
|
1,932
|
||||||||
Collateral
held1
|
(124)
|
||||||||
Carrying
value of derivative contracts – Other liabilities
|
($1,342)
|
|
1 As of
March 31, 2009, we held collateral of $515 million and posted collateral
of $295 million. We netted $419 million of collateral posted by
a counterparty whose position shifted from a net asset to a net liability
subsequent to the date collateral was transferred. This
resulted in
net collateral held of $96 and net collateral held from counterparties in
a net liability position of $124
million.
|
|
2
Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period
presentations.
|
- 32
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)
The
following table summarizes the components of interest expense, including the
location and amount of gains or losses on derivative instruments and related
hedged items, for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 as
reported in our Consolidated Statement of Income (dollars in
millions):
Three
months ended December 31,
|
Nine
months ended
December
31,
|
|||
2009
|
20084
|
2009
|
2008
4
|
|
Interest
expense on debt1
|
$553
|
$691
|
$1,783
|
$2,085
|
Interest
expense on pay float hedge accounting derivatives1
|
(188)
|
(112)
|
(573)
|
(371)
|
Interest
expense on pay float non-hedge accounting derivatives1,
3
|
(190)
|
(2)
|
(509)
|
(110)
|
Interest
expense on debt, net of pay float swaps
|
175
|
577
|
701
|
1,604
|
Interest
expense on non-hedge pay fixed swaps1
|
352
|
134
|
998
|
548
|
Loss
(gain) on hedge accounting derivatives:
|
||||
Interest
rate swaps2
|
10
|
(88)
|
25
|
(33)
|
Foreign
currency swaps2
|
370
|
306
|
(1,939)
|
2,707
|
Loss
(gain) on hedge accounting derivatives
|
380
|
218
|
(1,914)
|
2,674
|
Less
hedged item: fixed rate debt4
|
(399)
|
(202)
|
1,895
|
(2,651)
|
Ineffectiveness
related to hedge accounting derivatives2
|
(19)
|
16
|
(19)
|
23
|
(Gain)
loss on foreign currency transactions
|
(206)
|
(7)
|
1,471
|
(255)
|
Loss
(gain) on currency swaps and forwards 2
|
256
|
(14)
|
(1,400)
|
187
|
Loss
(gain) on other non-hedge accounting derivatives:
|
||||
Pay
float swaps2
|
87
|
(285)
|
220
|
9
|
Pay
fixed swaps2
|
(207)
|
1,409
|
(416)
|
398
|
Total
interest expense
|
$438
|
$1,830
|
$1,555
|
$2,514
|
1 Amounts
represent net interest settlements and changes in accruals.
2 Amounts
exclude net interest settlements and changes in accruals.
3 Includes
interest expense on both non-hedge accounting foreign currency swaps and
forwards, and non-hedge interest rate
derivatives.
|
4 Prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation.
- 33
-
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 8 – Derivatives,
Hedging Activities and Interest Expense (Continued)
The
following table summarizes the relative fair value allocation of derivative
credit valuation adjustments within interest expense (dollars in
millions).
Three
months ended December 31,
|
Nine
months ended December 31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
Ineffectiveness
related to hedge accounting derivatives
|
($3)
|
($16)
|
$17
|
($6)
|
Loss
(gain) on currency swaps and forwards
|
-
|
(9)
|
15
|
(9)
|
Loss
(gain) on non-hedge accounting derivatives:
|
||||
Pay
float swaps
|
(1)
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Pay
fixed swaps
|
2
|
(35)
|
30
|
(37)
|
Total
credit valuation adjustment allocated to interest expense
|
($2)
|
($60)
|
$62
|
($51)
|
- 34
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 9 – Other Assets and
Other Liabilities
Other
assets and other liabilities consisted of the following (dollars in
millions):
|
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
||
Other
assets:
|
|||
Notes
receivable from affiliates
|
$158
|
$1,231
|
|
Used
vehicles held for sale
|
265
|
358
|
|
Deferred
charges
|
222
|
246
|
|
Income
taxes receivable
|
333
|
186
|
|
Derivative
assets
|
804
|
175
|
|
Other
assets
|
524
|
444
|
|
Total
other assets
|
$2,306
|
$2,640
|
|
Other
liabilities:
|
|||
Unearned
insurance premiums and contract revenues
|
$1,380
|
$1,350
|
|
Derivative
liabilities
|
397
|
1,342
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
1,259
|
901
|
|
Deferred
income
|
243
|
283
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
319
|
273
|
|
Total
other liabilities
|
$3,598
|
$4,149
|
- 35
-
|
TOYOTA
MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION
|
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
Note 10 –
Debt
Debt and
the related weighted average contractual interest rates are summarized below
(dollars in millions):
Weighted
Average Contractual
Interest
Rates4
|
||||
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
Commercial
paper1
|
$17,134
|
$18,027
|
0.20%
|
1.50%
|
Notes
and loans payable2
|
50,186
|
55,053
|
3.91%
|
3.96%
|
Carrying
value adjustment3
|
1,858
|
(97)
|
||
Debt
|
$69,178
|
$72,983
|
2.95%
|
3.35%
|
1
Includes unamortized discount.
|
2
Includes unamortized premium/discount and effects of foreign currency
transaction gains and losses on non-hedged or de-designated
notes
and
loans payable which are denominated in foreign
currencies.
|
3
Represents the effects of fair value adjustments to debt in hedging
relationships, accrued redemption premium, and the unamortized fair
value adjustments on the hedged item for terminated fair value hedge
accounting relationships.
|
4
Calculated based on original notional or par value before
consideration of premium or discount or accrued redemption
premium.
|
Included
in our notes and loans payable are unsecured notes denominated in various
foreign currencies. At December 31 and March 31, 2009, the carrying
value of these notes payable was $33.9 billion and $28.5 billion,
respectively. Concurrent with the issuance of these foreign currency
unsecured notes, we entered into currency swaps in the same notional amount to
convert non-U.S. currency debt to U.S. dollar denominated payments.