Attached files

file filename
8-K - SWN FORM 8-K INVESTOR PRESENTATION - SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COswn010610form8k.htm

EXHIBIT 99.1

Slide Presentation dated January 2010

(Cover)
Southwestern Energy

January 2010 Update

 

NYSE: SWN

The left side of this slide contains a picture of a flock of birds in flight. One bird is leaving the flock in a positive direction to the right.  The caption above reads "Our Way."  The company's formula is located on the middle right of the picture.  The top-right corner of this slide contains the company logo.

(Slide 1)
Southwestern Energy Company (NYSE: SWN)

General Information

Southwestern Energy Company is an integrated natural gas company whose wholly-owned subsidiaries are engaged in natural gas and oil exploration and production and natural gas gathering and marketing.

Market Data as of December 31, 2009

Shares of Common Stock Outstanding

345,295,309

Market Capitalization

$16,643,000,000

Institutional Ownership

87.7%

Management Ownership

3.8%

52-Week Price Range

$25.99 (2/23/09) - $50.62 (12/24/09)

Investor Contacts

Greg D. Kerley
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Phone:

(281) 618-4803

Fax:

(281) 618-4820

 

Brad D. Sylvester, CFA
Vice President, Investor Relations

Phone:

(281) 618-4897

Fax:

(281) 618-4820

(Slide 2)
Forward-Looking Statements

All statements, other than historical financial information, may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements that address activities, outcomes and other matters that should or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, statements regarding the financial position, business strategy, production and reserve growth and other plans and objectives for Southwestern Energy Company's (the company) future operations, are forward-looking statements. Although the company believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The company has no obligation and makes no undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. They are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect the company’s operations, markets, products, services and prices and cause its actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in connection with forward-looking statements, risks, uncertainties and factors that could cause the company’s actual results to differ materially from those indicated in any forward-looking statement include, but are not limited to: the timing and extent of changes in market conditions and prices for natural gas and oil (including regional basis differentials); the company’s ability to transport its production to the most favorable markets or at all; the timing and extent of the company’s success in discovering, developing, producing and estimating reserves; the economic viability of, and the company’s success in drilling, the company’s large acreage position in the Fayetteville Shale play, overall as well as relative to other productive shale gas plays; the company’s ability to fund the company’s planned capital investments; the company’s ability to determine the most effective and economic fracture stimulation for the Fayetteville Shale formation; the impact of federal, state and local government regulation, including any increase in severance taxes; the costs and availability of oil field personnel services and drilling supplies, raw materials, and equipment and services; the company’s future property acquisition or divestiture activities; increased competition; the financial impact of accounting regulations and critical accounting policies; the comparative cost of alternative fuels; conditions in capital markets, changes in interest rates and the ability of the company’s lenders to provide it with funds as agreed; credit risk relating to the risk of loss as a result of non-performance by the company’s counterparties and any other factors listed in the reports the company has filed and may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). For additional information with respect to certain of these and other factors, see the reports filed by the company with the SEC. The company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


The SEC has generally permitted oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved reserves that a company has demonstrated by actual production or conclusive formation tests to be economically and legally producible under existing economic and operating conditions. We use the terms “estimated ultimate recovery,” “EUR,” “probable,” “possible,” and “non-proven” reserves, reserve “potential” or “upside” or other descriptions of volumes of reserves potentially recoverable through additional drilling or recovery techniques that the SEC’s guidelines may prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and accordingly are subject to substantially greater risk of being actually realized by the company.

 

The contents of this presentation are current as of January 6, 2010.

(Slide 3)
About Southwestern

* Focused on domestic exploration and production of natural gas.
  * 2,185 Bcfe of reserves; ~100% natural gas; 11.2 R/P at year-end 2008.
 
* E&P strategy built on organic growth through the drillbit.
  * Over 80% of planned E&P capital allocated to drilling in 2009.
 
* Track record of adding significant reserves at low costs.
 

* From 2004 through 2008, we've averaged production growth of 38%, reserve growth of 36%, 459% reserve replacement, and F&D cost of $1.94 per Mcfe.

   

* Proven management team has increased Southwestern's market capitalization from $187 million at year-end 1998 to over $16 billion today.

* Strategy built on the Formula:
  The Right People doing the Right Things, wisely investing the cash flow from the underlying Assets will create Value+.

 

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 4)
Recent Developments

Third Quarter 2009 Highlights

*  Production of 73.2 Bcfe, up 38%.

*  Discretionary cash flow(1) of $331.8 million, up 6%.

*  Net income of $118.3 million.

*  Significant progress realized in our Fayetteville Shale play.

*  Gross operated production from Fayetteville Shale was approximately 1.2 Bcf per day in October 2009, up from 600 MMcf a year ago.

 

* Strong Growth and Low-Cost Operations Set the Stage for a Record 2010

* 2010 planned capital investment program of approximately $2.1 billion, up 17% from 2009 levels.

* 2010 gas and oil production projected to grow approximately 36% to 400-410 Bcfe.

* Balance sheet positioned well for 2010.

* Debt-to-total capital ratio of 30% at September 30, 2009.

* $1 billion credit facility with $284.7 million drawn as of September 30, 2009 at an average interest rate of 1.1%.

 

(1) Discretionary cash flow is net cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities and is a non-GAAP financial measure (see explanation and reconciliation on page 27).

 

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 5)
Proven Track Record

This slide contains bar charts for the periods ended December 31.

                       
  2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Production (Bcfe) 36 40 40 41 54 61 72 113 195 297-300E 400-410E
Reserve Replacement (%) 211% 155% 215% 313% 364% 399% 386% 474% 523%    
EBITDA ($MM) (1) $104 $134 $99 $151 $255 $346 $415 $675 $1,362    
F&D Cost ($/Mcfe) $0.92 $1.59 $0.99 $1.32 $1.43 $1.70 $2.72 $2.55 $1.53    

Note: Reserve data includes reserve revisions and excludes capital investments in drilling rigs.

(1)    EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure.  See explanation and reconciliation of EBITDA on page 29.

 

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 6)
Areas of Operations

This slide contains a map of Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas and Pennsylvania with shadings to denote the Conventional Arkoma Basin, the East Texas region, the Fayetteville Shale and the Marcellus Shale.

Exploration and Production Segment

* 2008:

2,185 Bcfe of Reserves

 

~100% Natural Gas

  Production - 194.6 Bcfe
* 2009 Est. Production: 297-300 Bcfe
* 2010 Est. Production: 400-410 Bcfe

 

Conventional Arkoma

* Reserves: 281 Bcf (13%)

* Production: 24.4 Bcf (13%)
* Net Acres: 426,099 (12/31/08)

 

Fayetteville Shale

* Reserves: 1,545 Bcf (71%)

* Production: 134.5 Bcf (69%)
* Net Acres: 875,107 (12/31/08)

 

East Texas

* Reserves: 351 Bcfe (16%)

* Production: 31.6 Bcfe (16%)

* Net Acres: 134,403 (12/31/08)

 

Marcellus Shale

* Net Acres: 147,000 (11/4/09)

* Southwestern's E&P segment operates in Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana and Pennsylvania.

* Midstream Services segment provides marketing and gathering services for the E&P business.

 

Notes: 2008 reserve and production data by area does not add to year-end totals for the company due to assets which were sold during 2008 and the exclusion of New Ventures area.
  Conventional Arkoma acreage excludes 125,372 net acres in the conventional Arkoma Basin operating area that are also within the company's Fayetteville Shale focus area.

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 7)
Capital Investments

This slide contains a bar chart of company capital investments, summarized as follows:

     

 

      2010

2004

2005

2006

2007 2008 2009E Plan
 

($ Millions)

Corporate & Other

$13 

$16 

$32 

$16 

$17 

$36 

$80 

Property Acquisitions

$14 

$ - 

$18  $ 2  $ -  $ -  $ - 

Cap. Expense & Other E&P

$18 

$32 

$62 

$77 

$153 

$206 

$220 

Leasehold & Seismic

$21 

$61 

$70  $166  $149  $125  $205 

Development Drilling

$209 

$287 

$421  $1,110  $1,255  $1,185  $1,220 

Exploration Drilling

$20 

$36 

$196  $20  $39  $28  $105 
Midstream Services

$ - 

$16 

$49 

$107 

$183 

$220 

$270 

Drilling Rigs

$ - 

$35 

$94  $ 5  $ -  $ -  $ - 

Total

$295 

$483 

$942 

$1,503 

$1,796 

$1,800 

$2,100 

This slide also contains a pie chart of the company's preliminary planned 2010 capital investments by area of operation, summarized as follows:

% of Total

Capital Investments

Arkoma Fayetteville Shale

57%

Midstream

13%

East Texas

11%

Appalachia

7%

New Ventures

6%

Corp/Other

5%

Arkoma

1%

 

* E&P capital program heavily weighted to low-risk development drilling in 2010.

 

 

* Plan to invest approximately $1.5 billion in the Fayetteville Shale play in 2010.

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 8)

East Texas

This slide contains a map of several counties in East Texas and Louisiana and certain well production data.  The company's Overton and Angelina River Trend acreage positions and the DVN Well are highlighted.  The James Lime Horizontals, the Haynesville Horizontals, the Haynesville Shale Prospective Area and the East Texas Salt Basin are also denoted on the map.  The city of Tyler, Texas, is displayed as a reference point.

James Lime Horizontals

37 Wells Completed

Avg IP Rate - 9.5 MMcf/d

 

Haynesville Horizontals

First Well IP: 7.2 MMcf/d

Second Well IP: 13.4 MMcf/d

Third Well IP: 16.7 MMcf/d
Fourth Well: 21.0 MMcf/d
Fifth Well: Producing
Sixth Well: WOCU

 

CHK HK Other Operated Wells
108 Wells 59 Wells 85 Wells
Avg IP: 10.4 MMcf/d Avg IP: 16.7 MMcf/d Avg IP: 7.8 MMcf/d

 

* Entered area in 2000 with purchase of 10,800 acres at Overton for $6.1 million.

 

* Current acreage position of 24,400 gross acres at Overton and 87,000 gross acres at Angelina and Jebel.

 

* Drilled six horizontal wells targeting the Haynesville/Bossier Shale intervals (approximately 32,800 net acres).

 

* 2010 capital program includes participation in approximately 50-60 wells, 22-27 of which will be operated.

  * 21-26 wells targeting the Haynesville or Middle Bossier Shales; 29-34 wells targeting the James Lime, Pettet or Cotton Valley formations.

Sources: Southwestern Energy Company, RBC Capital Markets

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 9)

Marcellus Shale

 

This slide contains a map of several counties in Pennsylvania and New York and certain well production data.  The company's acreage positions are highlighted.  The locations of the company's four test wells are shown on the map: Greenzweig (2 wells), Range Trust and Price.  Lines trace the Dominion, Tennessee Gas, Millennium and Stagecoach transmission pipelines.

 

Other test wells and areas are located on the map with their respective production data:

 

Cabot

17 wells drilled, 9 producing

30 day avg = 3.5-10.9 MMcf/d

 

CHK

10.1 MMcf/d

8.9 MMcf/d

 

RRC

6.3 MMcf/d (vertical)

5.0 MMcf/d (vertical)

 

Other Test Wells

4.5 MMcf/d
4.0 MMcf/d

 

 

* Currently hold approximately 147,000 net acres in Northeast Pennsylvania with Marcellus potential with an average lease term of 7 years and average royalty of 13%.

 

* Purchased additional 23,862 net acres in 1Q 2009 for $8.7 million ($366/acre).

 
* Drilled 4 wells to date (3 vertical, 1 horizontal) with positive results.
 
* Plan to begin drilling in 2010 with one operated rig in Greenzweig area and participate in 35-40 wells, 21-24 of which will be operated.

 

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 10)
Fayetteville Shale Focus Area

This slide contains a map of the Fayetteville Shale Focus Area in Arkansas.  Existing pilot areas and portions of the conventional fairway are indicated. 753,600 net acres and 125,400 net acres HBP are outlined on the map.  The Ranger Anticline, Chattanooga Test and Moorefield Prospective Area are also denoted.  Lines trace the Ozark, Centerpoint, NGPL, MRT and TETCO transmission pipelines. A line also traces the Boardwalk Fayetteville Lateral (Phase 1) transmission pipeline in-service at 12/24/2008.

* SWN currently holds approximately 879,000 net acres in the Fayetteville Shale play area (equivalent to over 1,350 square miles).

 

* Mississippian-age shale, geological equivalent of the Barnett Shale in north Texas.

 

* During the first nine months of 2009, SWN had drilled and completed 324 operated wells, all of which were horizontal wells fracture stimulated with slickwater.

 
* We anticipate participating in 650-680 wells in 2010, 475-500 of which will be operated.

Notes:    Data as of September 30, 2009.

                Well data excludes 24 wells which were sold in May 2008.

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 11)
Fayetteville Shale - Improving Well Performance

Time Frame Wells Placed on Production Average IP Rate (Mcf/d) 30th-Day Avg Rate (# of wells) 60th-Day Avg Rate (# of wells) Avg Lateral Length Completion Method SW/XL/Hy-RHy
1st Qtr 2007 58 1,261 1,066 (58) 958 (58) 2,104 11/37/10
2nd Qtr 2007 46 1,497 1,254 (46) 1,034 (46) 2,512 24/12/10
3rd Qtr 2007 74 1,769 1,510 (72) 1,334 (72) 2,622 69/4/1
4th Qtr 2007 77 2,027 1,690 (77) 1,481 (77) 3,193 68/1/8
1st Qtr 2008 75 2,343 2,147 (75) 1,943 (74) 3,301 71/1/3
2nd Qtr 2008 83 2,541 2,155 (83) 1,886 (83) 3,562 83/0/0
3rd Qtr 2008 97 2,882 2,560 (97) 2,349 (97) 3,736 97/0/0
    4th Qtr 2008(1) 74    3,350(1) 2,722 (74) 2,386 (74) 3,850 74/0/0
    1st Qtr 2009(1) 120    2,992(1) 2,537 (120) 2,308 (119) 3,874 120/0/0
    2nd Qtr 2009 111    3,611 2,833 (111) 2,504 (105) 4,123 111/0/0
3rd Qtr 2009 93 3,604 2,543 (69) 2,334 (36) 4,100 93/0/0

 

* Focusing on longer laterals, slick-water completions and larger frac jobs.  Average completed well cost for 2009 is projected to be $2.9 million and $2.75 million for 2010.

 

* Over 98% of our 2010 planned wells will have the benefit of 3-D seismic (versus 70% in 2008).

 

Note: Data as of September 30, 2009.

(1)    The significant increase in the average initial production rate for the fourth quarter of 2008 and the subsequent decrease for the first quarter of 2009 primarily reflected the impact of the delay in the Boardwalk Pipeline.  Wells that were placed on production in January and February of 2009 had average initial production rates of 2,806 Mcf per day and 2,749 Mcf per day, respectively, while wells placed on production during March 2009 had average initial production rates of 3,353 Mcf per day.

 

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 12)
Fayetteville Shale - Horizontal Well Performance

The graph contained in this slide provides average daily production data through September 30, 2009, for the company's horizontal wells drilled in the Fayetteville Shale.  This graph displays three composite curves, one showing the SW/XL normalized production from all the company's horizontal wells excluding mechanical issues, another showing the SW normalized production from the company's horizontal wells with laterals greater than 3,000 feet excluding mechanical issues, and a third showing the SW normalized production from the company's horizontal wells with laterals greater than 4,000 feet excluding mechanical issues. The production data is compared to 3.0 Bcf, 2.5 Bcf, and 2.0 Bcf typecurves from the company's reservoir simulation shale gas model.  Well counts and respective days of production are also displayed, as follows:

Days of Production Total Well Count Horizontal Wells with Laterals > 3,000 Feet Horizontal Wells with Laterals > 4,000 Feet
       
30 960 631 209
60 949 604 193
120 865 532 158
180 795 456 109
240 704 385 84
300 630 316 52
360 579 269 38
420 530 221 25
480 467 176 14
540 415 127 6
600 362 98 4
660 315 63 1
720 268 36 1
780 224 21 0
840 175 10 0
900 146 3 0
960 112 1 0
1020 79 1 0
1080 48 0 0
1140 34 0 0
1200 19 0 0
1260 6 0 0
1320 2 0 0
1380 1 0 0
1440 1 0 0
1448 1 0 0

 

Notes: Data as of September 30, 2009 and excludes wells with mechanical problems (28).
  "Wells with Laterals > 3,000 Feet" curve excludes the last 128 days of production for the Guinn 09-15 #2-06H due to positive response to offset frac which may not be typical.

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 13)
Fayetteville Project - Gross Production

This slide contains a line graph displaying gross production in MMcf/d for the Fayetteville Shale from January 2006 to October 24, 2009. Gross operated production of approx. 1,230 MMcf/d as of October 24, 2009.  2008 Fayetteville Shale F&D cost of $1.21/Mcf.  Periods of production affected by pipeline curtailment issues are denoted.

(Slide 14)
Midstream - Adding Value Beyond the Wellhead

This slide contains a map of several counties in Arkansas where the company's Fayetteville Shale Focus Area is located.  These counties include Johnson, Pope, Van Buren, Cleburne, Logan, Yell, Conway, Faulkner and White.  Lines trace DeSoto Gathering Lines and the Ozark, Centerpoint, Boardwalk, NGPL, MRT and TETCO transmission pipelines.  Compression facilities are also indicated on the map.

* Midstream assets provide rapidly growing revenue stream and potential future funding source.

 

* At September 30, 2009, gathering approximately 1,304 MMcf per day through 1,091 miles of gathering lines, up from approximately 675 MMcf per day the same time a year ago.

 

* Midstream EBITDA(1) of $115-$120 million projected for 2009.

 

* Phase 1 of Fayetteville Lateral of Boardwalk Pipeline placed in-service late December 2008.  Fayetteville and Greenville Laterals placed in-service April 1, 2009.

 

* Planned Fayetteville Express Pipeline expected in-service January 2011 (FT volumes of 1,200,000 dkth/d).

 

Note:  Map as of September 30, 2009.

(1) EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure.  See explanation and reconciliation of EBITDA on page 29.

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 15)
Outlook for 2010

* Production target of 400-410 Bcfe in 2010 (estimated growth of ~36%).

    2009     2010 Guidance  
    Projected     NYMEX Price Assumption  
    $4.00 Gas   $4.00 Gas $5.00 Gas $6.00 Gas
    $60.00 Oil   $70.00 Oil $70.00 Oil $70.00 Oil
Adj. Net Income   $490 - $500 MM(1)   $435 - $445 MM $640 - $650 MM $845 - $855 MM
Adj. Diluted EPS   $1.40 - $1.43(1)   $1.24 - $1.27 $1.83 - $1.86 $2.41 - $2.44
EBITDA(2)   $1,340 - $1,350 MM   $1,365 - $1,375 MM $1,690 - $1,700 MM $2,010 - $2,020 MM
Net Cash Flow (2)   $1,360 - $1,370 MM   $1,355 - $1,365 MM $1,680 - $1,690 MM $1,990 - $2,000 MM
CapEx   $1,800 MM   $2,100 MM $2,100 MM $2,100 MM
Debt %   29%-31%(3)   37%-39% 29%-31% 24%-26%

 

 

(1)     Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS in 2009 exclude a $558.3 million after-tax non-cash ceiling test impairment and both are non-GAAP financial measures.  See explanation and reconciliation on page 28.

(2)     Net cash flow is net cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities.  Net cash flow and EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures.  See explanation and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures on pages 27 and 29.

(3)    2009 projected book capitalization includes the effect of the $558.3 million after-tax non-cash ceiling test impairment in the first quarter of 2009.

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 16)
The Road to V+

* Invest in the Highest PVI Projects.
   
* Flexibility in 2010 Capital Program.
 
* Maintain Strong Balance Sheet.
 
* Deliver the Numbers.
  * Production and Reserves.
  * Maximize Cash Flow.
   
* Continue to Tell Our Story.

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 17)
Appendix

(Slide 18)
Financial & Operational Summary

  Nine Months Ended September 30,   Year Ended December 31,
  2009   2008   2008 2007 2006
  ($ in millions, except per share amounts)
               
Revenues    $1,521.3   $1,811.5   $2,311.6 $1,255.1 $763.1
EBITDA (1)    963.8   1,075.6   1,362.3(2) 675.4 414.5
Adjusted Net Income 364.8(3)

 

463.7   567.9(2) 221.2 162.6
Net Cash Flow (1) 1,029.6   884.1   1,167.5 651.2 413.5
Adjusted Diluted EPS $1.06(3)   $1.34   $1.64(2) $0.64(4) $0.47(4)
Diluted CFPS (1) $3.00   $2.55   $3.37 $1.87(4) $1.21(4)
               
Production (Bcfe)   211.4   137.0   194.6 113.6 72.3
Avg. Gas Price ($/Mcf) $5.31   $8.19   $7.52 $6.80 $6.55
Avg. Oil Price ($/Bbl)  $49.47   $112.37   $107.18 $69.12 $58.36
               
Finding Cost ($/Mcfe) (5)         $1.53 $2.55 $2.72
Reserve Replacement (%) (5)         523% 474% 386%

 

(1)    Net cash flow is net cash flow before changes in operating assets and liabilities.  Net cash flow, EBITDA and diluted CFPS are non-GAAP financial measures.  See explanation and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures on pages 27 and 29.

(2)    Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS for 2008 includes after-tax gain on sale of utility assets of $35.4 million ($0.10 per diluted share) during the third quarter of 2008 (while EBITDA includes the pre-tax gain on sale of $57.3 million).

(3)    Adjusted net income and adjusted diluted EPS for 2009 exclude a $558.3 million after-tax non-cash ceiling test impairment and both are non-GAAP financial measures.  See explanation and reconciliation on page 28.

(4)    Diluted EPS and diluted CFPS have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split effected on March 25, 2008.

(5)    Includes reserve revisions and excludes capital investments in drilling rigs.

(Slide 19)
Gas Hedges in Place Through 2011

This slide contains a bar chart detailing gas hedges in place by quarter for year 2009, year 2010 and year 2011.  A summary of these gas hedges is as follows:

Average Price per Mcf

Percent

Type

Hedged Volumes

(or Floor/Ceiling)

Hedged

2009

Swaps

76.0 Bcf

$8.30

26%

Collars

59.0 Bcf

$8.71 / $11.69

20%

2010

Swaps

36.0 Bcf

$9.04

9%

Collars

30.0 Bcf

$6.80 / $8.43

7%

2011

Swaps

30.0 Bcf

$6.69

-

 

 

(Slide 20)

SWN is One of the Lowest Cost Operators

This slide contains a bar graph that compares SWN to its competitors in terms of Lifting Cost per Mcfe of production (3 year average).

   

Lifting Cost per Mcfe

   

of Production

   

(3 year average)

     

Southwestern Energy Company

  $0.95
Ultra Petroleum   $0.99

EOG Resources

  $1.06

Noble Energy

  $1.08

Chesapeake Energy

  $1.26
Range Resources   $1.29
EnCana   $1.36

Forest Oil

  $1.43

Pioneer Natural Resources

  $1.54
Newfield Exploration   $1.62
Devon Energy   $1.68
XTO Energy   $1.72

Anadarko Petroleum

  $1.75
Quicksilver Resources   $1.77

Cimarex Energy

  $1.77
Cabot Oil & Gas   $1.93
St. Mary Land & Exploration   $1.96
Apache   $2.02
Denbury Resources   $3.06

This slide also contains a bar graph comparing SWN to its competitors in terms of Drillbit F&D Cost per Mcfe (3 year average).

   

Drillbit F&D Cost

   

per Mcfe

   

(3 year average)

     
Ultra Petroleum   $1.00
Quicksilver Resources   $1.45

Southwestern Energy Company

  $2.06

Denbury Resources

  $2.25
Cabot Oil & Gas   $2.31
XTO Energy   $2.32
Range Resources   $2.37
EOG Resources   $2.39

EnCana

  $2.62
Devon Energy   $2.83
Newfield Exploration   $3.15
Noble Energy   $3.35

Apache

  $3.43

Forest Oil

  $3.50
Pioneer Natural Resources   $4.37
St. Mary Land & Exploration   $5.11

Cimarex Energy

  $5.61
Chesapeake Energy   $8.15

Anadarko Petroleum

  $9.07

 

Source:  John S. Herold Database and public filings.

Note:  All data as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008.

            Lifting Cost per Mcfe defined as production expenses plus production taxes divided by production.

Drillbit F&D Cost per Mcfe defined as three-year sum of total costs incurred less the three-year sum of proved acquisitions cost divided by the three-year sum of reserve additions from extensions and discoveries.

 

(Slide 21)

Fayetteville Shale Activity Compared to the Barnett


This slide contains bar charts displaying the number of wells drilled in the Barnett Shale Play and the Fayetteville Shale Play, summarized as follows:


Barnett Shale Play

*1981 – 1st Well Drilled

*1992 – 1st Horizontal Well Drilled

*1997 – 1st Slickwater Frac


1981-1989

Avg. 7 Vertical Wells/Year

1990-1994

Avg. 28 Vertical Wells/Year

1995-1999

Avg. 75 Vertical Wells/Year

2000

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

165

0

2001

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

408

1

 

2002

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

669

2

 

2003

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

663

70

 

2004

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

524

260

 

2005

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

351

701

 

2006

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

276

1,214

 

2007

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

178

2,117

 

2008

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

145

2,508

 

2009E

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

87

1,513

 



Fayetteville Shale Play

*Q2 2004 – 1st Well Drilled

*Q1 2005 – 1st Horizontal Well Drilled

*Q3 2005 – 1st Slickwater Frac


2004

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

14

0

 

2005

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

37

13

 

2006

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

12

103

 

2007

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

13

419

 

2008

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

14

690

 

2009E

Vertical Wells Drilled

Horizontal Wells Drilled

0

675

 


Source: Republic Energy Co., PI-Dwights (IHS Energy), Southwestern Energy


Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

 

(Slide 22)

Fayetteville Shale Production Compared to the Barnett

 

The graph contained in this slide displays production volumes in MMcf/d for the Fayetteville Shale over a more than 4-year period and the Barnett Shale over a more than 24-year period.  Total Fayetteville Shale Field average daily production for August 2009 was 1,615 MMcf/d.


A box accompanying the graph states:

We collapsed the “learning curve” dramatically; Paradigm shift in gas prices


Source: Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. Securities, Inc., Arkansas Oil & Gas Commission

(Slide 23)

U.S. Gas Consumption and Sources

This slide displays U.S. dry gas production versus U.S. gas consumption in Bcf from 1975 to present. Net imports for the same period are also given.  U.S. gas consumption and production rising in recent years.

Source: EIA

(Slide 24)
U.S. Electricity Consumption on the Rise

This line graph shows U.S. electricity consumption in billion kilowatt-hours per month from 1990 to present.

Source:  Edison Electric Institute

(Slide 25)
U.S. Gas Drilling and Prices

This line graph denotes the number of rigs drilling for gas and the gas price in dollars per MMBtu through the period 2000 to present.

Source:  Baker Hughes, Bloomberg

(Slide 26)
Oil and Gas Price Comparison

This line graph compares the prices of Henry Hub natural gas and WTI crude oil in $/MMBtu and $/Bbl, respectively, for the period 1994 to present.

Source:  Bloomberg

(Slide 27)

Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Net Cash Flow

We report our financial results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP").  However, management believes certain non-GAAP performance measures may provide users of this financial information additional meaningful comparisons between current results and the results of our peers and of prior periods.  One such non-GAAP financial measure is net cash flow.  Management presents this measure because (i) it is accepted as an indicator of an oil and gas exploration and production company's ability to internally fund exploration and development activities and to service or incur additional debt, (ii) changes in operating assets and liabilities relate to the timing of cash receipts and disbursements which the company may not control and (iii) changes in operating assets and liabilities may not relate to the period in which the operating activities occurred.  These adjusted amounts are not a measure of financial performance under GAAP.

  9 Months Ended September 30,   12 Months Ended December 31,
  2009   2008 2008 2007 2006
  (in thousands)   (in thousands)

Net cash provided by operating activities

$989,526     $966,707   $1,160,809   $622,735   $429,937  

Add back (deduct):

           

Change in operating assets and liabilities

40,098     (82,621) 6,685   28,435   (16,429) 

Net cash flow

$1,029,624     $884,086   $1,167,494   $651,170   $413,508  

  2009 Guidance     2010 Guidance  
  NYMEX Commodity Price Assumption
  $4.00 Gas   $4.00 Gas $5.00 Gas $6.00 Gas
  $60.00 Oil   $70.00 Oil $70.00 Oil $70.00 Oil

($ in millions)

($ in millions)

Net cash provided by operating activities $1,360 - $1,370   $1,355 - $1,365 $1,680 - $1,690 $1,990 - $2,000
Add back (deduct):          
    Assumed change in operating assets and liabilities --   -- -- --

Net cash flow

$1,360 - $1,370   $1,355 - $1,365 $1,680 - $1,690 $1,990 - $2,000

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 28)
Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures: Adjusted Net Income

Additional non-GAAP financial measures we may present from time to time are net income attributable to Southwestern Energy and diluted earnings per share attributable to Southwestern Energy stockholders, both of which exclude certain charges or amounts.  Management presents these measures because (i) they are consistent with the manner in which the Company's performance is measured relative to the performance of its peers, (ii) these measures are more comparable to earnings estimates provided by securities analysts, and (iii) charges or amounts excluded cannot be reasonably estimated and guidance provided by the Company excludes information regarding these types of items.  These adjusted amounts are not a measure of financial performance under GAAP.

9 Months Ended
September 30, 2009

($ in thousands)

(per share)

Net income (loss) attributable to SWN

($193,476)

($0.56)
Add back:
    Impairment of natural gas and oil properties (net of taxes)

558,305 

1.62

Adjusted net income

$364,829 

$1.06

The table below reconciles forecasted adjusted net income with GAAP net income for 2009, assuming various NYMEX price scenarios and the corresponding estimated impact on the company's results for 2009, including current hedges in place:

2009 Guidance
Overall Corporate
NYMEX Commodity Price Assumption
      $4.00 Gas    
      $60.00 Oil    

($ in millions)

Net income (loss) attributable to SWN     ($68) - ($58)  
    Add back: Impairment of natural gas and oil properties (net of taxes)     558    

Adjusted net income

    $490 - $500    

 

    2009 Guidance  
Overall Corporate
NYMEX Commodity Price Assumption
      $4.00 Gas    
      $60.00 Oil    

(per share)

Diluted earnings per share attributable to SWN stockholders     ($0.22) - ($0.19)  
    Add back: Impairment of natural gas and oil properties (net of taxes)     1.62    

Adjusted diluted earnings per share

    $1.40 - $1.43    

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".

(Slide 29)

Explanation and Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures: EBITDA

EBITDA is defined as net income plus interest, income tax expense, depreciation, depletion and amortization. Southwestern has included information concerning EBITDA because it is used by certain investors as a measure of the ability of a company to service or incur indebtedness and because it is a financial measure commonly used in the energy industry.  EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income, net cash provided by operating activities or other income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or as a measure of the company's profitability or liquidity. EBITDA as defined above may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Net income is a financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The table below reconciles historical EBITDA with historical net income.

9 Months Ended

 September 30,

  12 Months Ended December 31,

2009   2008   2008 (1) 2007

2006  

2005  

2004  

2003  

2002  

2001  

2000  

         

($ in thousands)

 

Net income (loss) attributable to SWN

  ($193,476) (2) $463,747    $567,946    $221,174    $162,636   

$147,760 

 

$103,576 

 

$48,897 

 

$14,311 

 

$35,324 

 

$20,461 

(6)
Add back:                                            

Net interest expense

12,027     27,104    28,904    23,873    679   

15,040 

 

16,992 

 

17,311 

 

21,466 

 

23,699 

 

24,689 

 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

(118,582) (3) 284,232  350,999  135,855  99,399 

86,431 

59,778 

28,372 

(5)

8,708 

21,917 

11,457 

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

1,263,801  

(4)

300,529 

 

414,460 

294,500 

151,795 

96,641 

74,919 

56,833 

54,095 

53,003 

47,505 

EBITDA

$963,770     $1,075,612    $1,362,309    $675,402    $414,509   

$345,872 

 

$255,265 

 

$151,413 

 

$98,580 

 

$133,943 

 

$104,112 

(6)

 

(1)    Net income for the Midstream Services segment was $35,145, depreciation, depletion and amortization was $11,402, net interest expense was $6,059 and provision for income taxes was $21,278.

(2)    Net income (loss) includes the after tax $558.3 million non-cash ceiling impairment of our natural gas and oil properties recorded in Q1 2009.

(3)    Provision (benefit) for income taxes includes the ($349.5) million income tax benefit related to the non-cash ceiling impairment of our natural gas and oil properties recorded in Q1 2009.

(4)    Depreciation, depletion and amortization includes the $907.8 million non-cash ceiling impairment of our natural gas and oil properties recorded in Q1 2009.

(5)    Provision for income taxes for 2003 includes the tax benefit associated with the cumulative effect of adoption of accounting principle.

(6)    2000 amounts exclude unusual items of $109.3 million for the Hales judgment and $2.0 million for other litigation.

 

The table below reconciles forecasted EBITDA with forecasted net income for 2009 and 2010, assuming various NYMEX price scenarios and the corresponding estimated impact on the company's results for 2009 and 2010, including current hedges in place:

 
2009 Guidance
 
2010 Guidance
 
Overall Corporate
   
Overall Corporate
  NYMEX Commodity Assumption Midstream   NYMEX Commodity Assumption
    $4.00 Gas   Services   $4.00 Gas   $5.00 Gas   $6.00 Gas
    $60.00 Oil   Segment (1)   $70.00 Oil   $70.00 Oil   $70.00 Oil
    ($ in millions)
Net income (loss) attributable to SWN   ($68) - ($58)

(2)

$51 - $53   $435 - $445   $640 - $650   $845 - $855
Add back:                    
    Provision (benefit) for income taxes   (35) - (29)

(3)

31 - 33   271 - 277   395 - 401   518 - 524
    Interest expense   17 - 18   13 - 15   21 - 22   19 - 20   16 - 17
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization   1,410 - 1,415

(4)

20 - 22   625 - 630   625 - 630   625 - 630
EBITDA   $1,340 - $1,350   $115 - $120   $1,365 - $1,375   $1,690 - $1,700   $2,010 - $2,020

 

(1)    Midstream Services segment results assume NYMEX commodity prices of $4.00 per Mcf for natural gas and $60.00 per barrel for crude oil for 2009.

(2)    Net income (loss) includes the after tax full cost ceiling impairment of our natural gas and oil properties recorded in Q1 2009.

(3)    Provision (benefit) for income taxes includes the income tax benefit related to the full cost ceiling impairment of our natural gas and oil properties recorded in Q1 2009.

(4)    Depreciation, depletion and amortization includes the $907.8 million full cost ceiling impairment of our natural gas and oil properties recorded in Q1 2009.

Note that the information contained on this slide constitutes a "Forward-Looking Statement".