Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32 - BCTC IV CERTIFICATION 906 SEPTEMBER 2009 - BF Garden Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. | b4909cert906mnt.htm |
EX-31 - BCTC IV CERTIFICATION 302 SEPTEMBER 2009 - BF Garden Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. | b4909cert302jpm.htm |
EX-32 - BCTC IV CERTIFICATION 906 SEPTEMBER 2009 - BF Garden Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. | b4909cert906jpm.htm |
EX-31 - BCTC IV CERTIFICATION 302 SEPTEMBER 2009 - BF Garden Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. | b4909cert302mnt.htm |
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission file number 0-26200
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND IV L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
04-3208648 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization) |
Identification No.) |
One Boston Place, Suite 2100, Boston, Massachusetts 02108
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(617) 624-8900
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý |
No |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes |
No |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Large accelerated filer |
Accelerated filer |
Non-accelerated filer |
Smaller reporting company ý |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes |
No ý |
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND IV L.P.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||
Pages |
||||
Item 1. Financial Statements |
||||
Balance Sheets |
3-30 |
|||
Statements of Operations |
31-86 |
|||
Statements of Changes in Partners' |
|
|||
Statements of Cash Flows |
97-124 |
|||
Notes to Financial Statements |
125-160 |
|||
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of |
|
|||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
|||
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures |
238 |
|||
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
239 |
|||
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
239 |
|||
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
|||
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
239 |
|||
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
|||
Item 5. Other Information |
239 |
|||
Item 6. Exhibits |
240 |
|||
Signatures |
240 |
|||
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
113,225,297 |
$ |
119,173,321 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
5,998,048 |
6,181,988 |
||
Notes receivable |
723,071 |
723,071 |
||
Acquisition costs net |
11,689,516 |
12,900,860 |
||
Other assets |
245,146 |
750,017 |
||
$ |
131,881,078 |
$ |
139,729,257 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
88,264 |
$ |
38,389 |
Accounts payable affiliates |
48,128,325 |
46,245,459 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
2,097,899 |
2,347,899 |
||
50,314,488 |
48,631,747 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
87,917,144 |
97,352,756 |
||
General Partner |
(6,350,554) |
(6,255,246) |
||
81,566,590 |
91,097,510 |
|||
$ |
131,881,078 |
$ |
139,729,257 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 20
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
143,746 |
174,531 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
- |
- |
||
Other assets |
40,624 |
- |
||
$ |
184,370 |
$ |
174,531 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
3,264,068 |
3,145,192 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
- |
- |
||
3,264,068 |
3,145,192 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
(2,740,650) |
(2,632,703) |
||
General Partner |
(339,048) |
(337,958) |
||
(3,079,698) |
(2,970,661) |
|||
$ |
184,370 |
$ |
174,531 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 21
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
- |
$ |
97,879 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
378,260 |
15,500 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
- |
- |
||
Other assets |
- |
88,577 |
||
$ |
378,260 |
$ |
201,956 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
15,000 |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,547,562 |
1,974,141 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
- |
- |
||
1,562,562 |
1,974,141 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
(1,010,508) |
(1,592,512) |
||
General Partner |
(173,794) |
(179,673) |
||
(1,184,302) |
(1,772,185) |
|||
$ |
378,260 |
$ |
201,956 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 22
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
60,991 |
77,660 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
- |
- |
||
Other assets |
1,750 |
500 |
||
$ |
62,741 |
$ |
78,160 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
3,212,596 |
3,079,966 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
9,352 |
9,352 |
||
3,221,948 |
3,089,318 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
(2,908,533) |
(2,761,964) |
||
General Partner |
(250,674) |
(249,194) |
||
(3,159,207) |
(3,011,158) |
|||
$ |
62,741 |
$ |
78,160 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 23
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
17,522 |
34,902 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
- |
- |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
17,522 |
$ |
34,902 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
2,689,079 |
2,563,533 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
- |
- |
||
2,689,079 |
2,563,533 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
(2,359,995) |
(2,218,498) |
||
General Partner |
(311,562) |
(310,133) |
||
(2,671,557) |
(2,528,631) |
|||
$ |
17,522 |
$ |
34,902 |
|
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 24
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
187,637 |
119,321 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
- |
- |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
187,637 |
$ |
119,321 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
6,792 |
$ |
678 |
Accounts payable affiliates |
2,437,976 |
2,407,892 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
9,999 |
9,999 |
||
2,454,767 |
2,418,569 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
(2,059,161) |
(2,090,958) |
||
General Partner |
(207,969) |
(208,290) |
||
(2,267,130) |
(2,299,248) |
|||
$ |
187,637 |
$ |
119,321 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 25
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
- |
$ |
9,461 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
292,166 |
166,596 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
28,569 |
34,283 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
320,735 |
$ |
210,340 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
13,114 |
$ |
978 |
Accounts payable affiliates |
2,278,446 |
2,209,438 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
10,001 |
10,001 |
||
2,301,561 |
2,220,417 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
(1,703,574) |
(1,732,532) |
||
General Partner |
(277,252) |
(277,545) |
||
(1,980,826) |
(2,010,077) |
|||
$ |
320,735 |
$ |
210,340 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 26
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
1,547,121 |
$ |
1,338,250 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
221,491 |
366,614 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
51,484 |
68,646 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
1,820,096 |
$ |
1,773,510 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
9,125 |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
3,101,151 |
3,089,600 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
14,490 |
14,490 |
||
3,124,766 |
3,104,090 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
(951,370) |
(977,021) |
||
General Partner |
(353,300) |
(353,559) |
||
(1,304,670) |
(1,330,580) |
|||
$ |
1,820,096 |
$ |
1,773,510 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 27
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
2,984,249 |
$ |
2,695,200 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
180,300 |
109,954 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
228,871 |
261,567 |
||
Other assets |
20,074 |
6,500 |
||
$ |
3,413,494 |
$ |
3,073,221 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
3,135,489 |
2,973,142 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
39,749 |
39,749 |
||
3,175,238 |
3,012,891 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
442,321 |
266,174 |
||
General Partner |
(204,065) |
(205,844) |
||
238,256 |
60,330 |
|||
$ |
3,413,494 |
$ |
3,073,221 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 28
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
371,688 |
$ |
688,188 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
233,495 |
192,128 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
- |
- |
||
Other assets |
2,717 |
- |
||
$ |
607,900 |
$ |
880,316 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
878,522 |
736,464 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
40,968 |
40,968 |
||
919,490 |
777,432 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
35,274 |
445,603 |
||
General Partner |
(346,864) |
(342,719) |
||
(311,590) |
102,884 |
|||
$ |
607,900 |
$ |
880,316 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 29
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
476,619 |
$ |
609,522 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
142,364 |
137,986 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
43,424 |
57,898 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
662,407 |
$ |
805,406 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
2,398,091 |
2,232,389 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
10,197 |
10,197 |
||
2,408,288 |
2,242,586 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
(1,389,775) |
(1,084,161) |
||
General Partner |
(356,106) |
(353,019) |
||
(1,745,881) |
(1,437,180) |
|||
$ |
662,407 |
$ |
805,406 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 30
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
1,097,982 |
$ |
1,217,326 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
239,052 |
264,094 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
156,510 |
208,680 |
||
Other assets |
6,675 |
6,675 |
||
$ |
1,500,219 |
$ |
1,696,775 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,120,215 |
1,027,129 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
127,396 |
127,396 |
||
1,247,611 |
1,154,525 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
477,138 |
763,884 |
||
General Partner |
(224,530) |
(221,634) |
||
252,608 |
542,250 |
|||
$ |
1,500,219 |
$ |
1,696,775 |
|
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 31
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
266,886 |
$ |
647,143 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
158,824 |
182,803 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
- |
- |
||
Other assets |
25,000 |
25,000 |
||
$ |
450,710 |
$ |
854,946 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,800,734 |
1,618,658 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
66,294 |
66,294 |
||
1,867,028 |
1,684,952 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
(1,022,896) |
(442,447) |
||
General Partner |
(393,422) |
(387,559) |
||
(1,416,318) |
(830,006) |
|||
$ |
450,710 |
$ |
854,946 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 32
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
2,620,774 |
$ |
3,031,771 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
271,841 |
237,567 |
||
Notes receivable |
46,908 |
46,908 |
||
Acquisition costs net |
327,645 |
393,173 |
||
Other assets |
9,962 |
125,000 |
||
$ |
3,277,130 |
$ |
3,834,419 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
3,750 |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
2,369,608 |
2,208,623 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
173,561 |
298,561 |
||
2,546,919 |
2,507,184 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
1,129,270 |
1,720,324 |
||
General Partner |
(399,059) |
(393,089) |
||
730,211 |
1,327,235 |
|||
$ |
3,277,130 |
$ |
3,834,419 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 33
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
1,643,439 |
$ |
1,789,130 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
174,540 |
179,652 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
29,950 |
35,940 |
||
Other assets |
- |
125,000 |
||
$ |
1,847,929 |
$ |
2,129,722 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
3,750 |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,411,889 |
1,321,714 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
69,154 |
194,154 |
||
1,484,793 |
1,515,868 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
585,285 |
833,496 |
||
General Partner |
(222,149) |
(219,642) |
||
363,136 |
613,854 |
|||
$ |
1,847,929 |
$ |
2,129,722 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 34
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
1,830,881 |
$ |
1,959,856 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
45,488 |
72,369 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
569,019 |
758,693 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
2,445,388 |
$ |
2,790,918 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
2,556,068 |
2,403,399 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
- |
- |
||
2,556,068 |
2,403,399 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership 3,529,319 issued and outstanding |
190,818 |
684,035 |
||
General Partner |
(301,498) |
(296,516) |
||
(110,680) |
387,519 |
|||
$ |
2,445,388 |
$ |
2,790,918 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 35
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
5,334,288 |
$ |
5,644,539 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
95,224 |
118,051 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
253,005 |
289,149 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
5,682,517 |
$ |
6,051,739 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,271,162 |
1,156,982 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
- |
- |
||
1,271,162 |
1,156,982 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
4,649,266 |
5,127,834 |
||
General Partner |
(237,911) |
(233,077) |
||
4,411,355 |
4,894,757 |
|||
$ |
5,682,517 |
$ |
6,051,739 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 36
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
3,616,390 |
$ |
3,832,441 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
118,361 |
101,615 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
74,596 |
89,516 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
3,809,347 |
$ |
4,023,572 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,585,855 |
1,500,062 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
- |
- |
||
1,585,855 |
1,500,062 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
2,379,920 |
2,676,938 |
||
General Partner |
(156,428) |
(153,428) |
||
2,223,492 |
2,523,510 |
|||
$ |
3,809,347 |
$ |
4,023,572 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 37
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
3,576,844 |
$ |
3,894,815 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
293,368 |
272,497 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
413,868 |
472,992 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
4,284,080 |
$ |
4,640,304 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,325,259 |
1,222,827 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
138,438 |
138,438 |
||
1,463,697 |
1,361,265 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
3,007,743 |
3,461,812 |
||
General Partner |
(187,360) |
(182,773) |
||
2,820,383 |
3,279,039 |
|||
$ |
4,284,080 |
$ |
4,640,304 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 38
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
5,963,671 |
$ |
6,295,306 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
236,024 |
261,393 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
91,767 |
104,877 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
6,291,462 |
$ |
6,661,576 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,196,223 |
1,164,023 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
- |
- |
||
1,196,223 |
1,164,023 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
5,262,571 |
5,660,862 |
||
General Partner |
(167,332) |
(163,309) |
||
5,095,239 |
5,497,553 |
|||
$ |
6,291,462 |
$ |
6,661,576 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 39
|
September 30, |
March 31, |
||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
5,701,329 |
$ |
6,063,709 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
179,038 |
239,921 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
77,244 |
88,280 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
5,957,611 |
$ |
6,391,910 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
982,299 |
963,899 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
- |
- |
||
982,299 |
963,899 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
5,122,000 |
5,570,172 |
||
General Partner |
(146,688) |
(142,161) |
||
4,975,312 |
5,428,011 |
|||
$ |
5,957,611 |
$ |
6,391,910 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 40
|
September 30, |
March 31, |
||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
6,934,213 |
$ |
7,326,362 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
106,101 |
127,519 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
185,623 |
212,141 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
7,225,937 |
$ |
7,666,022 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
36,733 |
$ |
36,733 |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,884,086 |
1,776,106 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
102 |
102 |
||
1,920,921 |
1,812,941 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
5,476,909 |
6,019,493 |
||
General Partner |
(171,893) |
(166,412) |
||
5,305,016 |
5,853,081 |
|||
$ |
7,225,937 |
$ |
7,666,022 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 41
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
5,922,917 |
$ |
6,283,404 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
71,019 |
40,375 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
1,272,431 |
1,413,813 |
||
Other assets |
2,052 |
1,217 |
||
$ |
7,268,419 |
$ |
7,738,809 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
2,344,113 |
2,212,394 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
100 |
100 |
||
2,344,213 |
2,212,494 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
5,124,133 |
5,720,221 |
||
General Partner |
(199,927) |
(193,906) |
||
4,924,206 |
5,526,315 |
|||
$ |
7,268,419 |
$ |
7,738,809 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 42
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
7,015,038 |
$ |
7,460,540 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
402,624 |
359,855 |
||
Notes receivable |
292,933 |
292,933 |
||
Acquisition costs net |
965,493 |
1,029,859 |
||
Other assets |
51,003 |
168,631 |
||
$ |
8,727,091 |
$ |
9,311,818 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,199,077 |
1,122,917 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
452,937 |
452,937 |
||
1,652,014 |
1,575,854 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
7,245,265 |
7,899,543 |
||
General Partner |
(170,188) |
(163,579) |
||
7,075,077 |
7,735,964 |
|||
$ |
8,727,091 |
$ |
9,311,818 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 43
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
11,087,966 |
$ |
11,543,202 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
265,809 |
185,952 |
||
Notes receivable |
186,626 |
186,626 |
||
Acquisition costs net |
2,038,805 |
2,174,725 |
||
Other assets |
85,289 |
202,917 |
||
$ |
13,664,495 |
$ |
14,293,422 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
1,269,200 |
1,115,810 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
307,738 |
307,738 |
||
1,576,938 |
1,423,548 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
12,288,203 |
13,062,697 |
||
General Partner |
(200,646) |
(192,823) |
||
12,087,557 |
12,869,874 |
|||
$ |
13,664,495 |
$ |
14,293,422 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 44
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
9,938,479 |
$ |
10,442,251 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
603,987 |
791,833 |
||
Notes receivable |
196,604 |
196,604 |
||
Acquisition costs net |
2,120,990 |
2,262,390 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
12,860,060 |
$ |
13,693,078 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
406,455 |
439,103 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
590,561 |
590,561 |
||
997,016 |
1,029,664 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
11,981,863 |
12,774,229 |
||
General Partner |
(118,819) |
(110,815) |
||
11,863,044 |
12,663,414 |
|||
$ |
12,860,060 |
$ |
13,693,078 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 45
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
18,496,279 |
$ |
19,184,988 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
582,515 |
871,105 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
2,160,775 |
2,304,827 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
21,239,569 |
$ |
22,360,920 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
259,147 |
350,865 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
16,724 |
16,724 |
||
275,871 |
367,589 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
21,107,723 |
22,127,060 |
||
General Partner |
(144,025) |
(133,729) |
||
20,963,698 |
21,993,331 |
|||
$ |
21,239,569 |
$ |
22,360,920 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
Series 46
September 30, |
March 31, |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS |
||||
(Note D) |
$ |
16,798,244 |
$ |
17,118,038 |
OTHER ASSETS |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
296,261 |
480,195 |
||
Notes receivable |
- |
- |
||
Acquisition costs net |
599,447 |
639,411 |
||
Other assets |
- |
- |
||
$ |
17,693,952 |
$ |
18,237,644 |
|
LIABILITIES |
||||
Accounts payable & accrued expenses |
||||
(Note C) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Accounts payable affiliates |
203,955 |
229,191 |
||
Capital contributions payable |
20,138 |
20,138 |
||
224,093 |
249,329 |
|||
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT) |
||||
Assignees |
||||
Units of limited partnership |
17,557,904 |
18,071,175 |
||
General Partner |
(88,045) |
(82,860) |
||
17,469,859 |
17,988,315 |
|||
$ |
17,693,952 |
$ |
18,237,644 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
7,746 |
$ |
41,459 |
Other income |
185,312 |
99,221 |
||
193,058 |
140,680 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
518,404 |
701,803 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
1,470,866 |
1,533,002 |
||
Amortization |
618,839 |
402,562 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
229,002 |
231,120 |
||
2,837,111 |
2,868,487 |
|||
$ |
(4,933,305) |
$ |
(7,457,369) |
|
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.06) |
$ |
(.09) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 20
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
548 |
$ |
1,307 |
Other income |
1,180 |
57,347 |
||
1,728 |
58,654 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
19,079 |
27,143 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
77,790 |
68,834 |
||
Amortization |
- |
893 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
10,723 |
9,852 |
||
107,592 |
106,722 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(105,864) |
$ |
(125,958) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.03) |
$ |
(.03) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 21
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
192 |
$ |
28 |
Other income |
2,709 |
- |
||
2,901 |
28 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
13,537 |
18,693 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
30,469 |
42,453 |
||
Amortization |
- |
488 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
6,205 |
6,154 |
||
50,211 |
67,788 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
362,690 |
$ |
(91,845) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
.19 |
$ |
(.05) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 22
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
18 |
$ |
82 |
Other income |
- |
6,237 |
||
18 |
6,319 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
20,593 |
28,322 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
60,836 |
57,419 |
||
Amortization |
- |
1,535 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
8,098 |
7,814 |
||
89,527 |
95,090 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(89,509) |
$ |
(101,390) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.03) |
$ |
(.04) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 23
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
33 |
$ |
162 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
33 |
162 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
17,835 |
26,413 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
59,566 |
56,316 |
||
Amortization |
- |
2,283 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
9,608 |
9,036 |
||
87,009 |
94,048 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(86,976) |
$ |
(97,697) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.03) |
$ |
(.03) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 24
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
25 |
$ |
663 |
Other income |
55,344 |
282 |
||
55,369 |
945 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
19,665 |
27,043 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
40,883 |
54,350 |
||
Amortization |
- |
2,551 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
6,836 |
6,688 |
||
67,384 |
90,632 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(12,015) |
$ |
(97,587) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.01) |
$ |
(.04) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 25
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
737 |
$ |
1,578 |
Other income |
86,661 |
936 |
||
87,398 |
2,514 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
21,666 |
34,783 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
50,071 |
56,516 |
||
Amortization |
2,857 |
3,805 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
8,449 |
8,072 |
||
83,043 |
103,176 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
3,879 |
$ |
(173,814) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
.00 |
$ |
(.06) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 26
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
183 |
$ |
1,490 |
Other income |
23,708 |
589 |
||
23,891 |
2,079 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
32,867 |
45,023 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
90,622 |
89,043 |
||
Amortization |
8,581 |
4,226 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
10,678 |
9,866 |
||
142,748 |
148,158 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(15,062) |
$ |
(222,829) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.00) |
$ |
(.06) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 27
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
27 |
$ |
488 |
Other income |
- |
703 |
||
27 |
1,191 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
16,586 |
24,303 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
(10,199) |
54,843 |
||
Amortization |
17,123 |
3,914 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
6,837 |
6,715 |
||
30,347 |
89,775 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
133,185 |
$ |
(165,728) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
.05 |
$ |
(.07) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 28
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
557 |
$ |
550 |
Other income |
1,993 |
4,492 |
||
2,550 |
5,042 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
22,949 |
33,679 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
74,779 |
79,529 |
||
Amortization |
- |
825 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
10,042 |
9,596 |
||
107,770 |
123,629 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(210,637) |
$ |
(425,856) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.05) |
$ |
(.11) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 29
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
37 |
$ |
1,180 |
Other income |
5,239 |
- |
||
5,276 |
1,180 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
21,431 |
32,852 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
68,589 |
83,245 |
||
Amortization |
7,237 |
828 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
10,633 |
9,823 |
||
107,890 |
126,748 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(180,908) |
$ |
(417,166) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.04) |
$ |
(.10) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 30
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
962 |
$ |
1,456 |
Other income |
555 |
- |
||
1,517 |
1,456 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
19,728 |
27,214 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
39,969 |
40,154 |
||
Amortization |
26,085 |
5,310 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
7,545 |
7,135 |
||
93,327 |
79,813 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(149,574) |
$ |
(235,386) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.06) |
$ |
(.09) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 31
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
489 |
$ |
793 |
Other income |
5,923 |
- |
||
6,412 |
793 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
24,321 |
33,003 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
89,538 |
87,788 |
||
Amortization |
- |
- |
||
General and administrative expenses |
9,972 |
9,349 |
||
123,831 |
130,140 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(300,237) |
$ |
(396,706) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.07) |
$ |
(.09) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 32
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
760 |
$ |
2,450 |
Other income |
2,000 |
- |
||
2,760 |
2,450 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
18,788 |
31,349 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
67,276 |
77,086 |
||
Amortization |
32,764 |
9,181 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
10,004 |
9,992 |
||
128,832 |
127,608 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(349,597) |
$ |
(606,169) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.07) |
$ |
(.13) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 33
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
239 |
$ |
249 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
239 |
249 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
14,042 |
15,623 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
31,221 |
38,491 |
||
Amortization |
2,995 |
6,819 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
6,664 |
6,834 |
||
54,922 |
67,767 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(130,725) |
$ |
(166,833) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.05) |
$ |
(.06) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 34
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
9 |
$ |
42 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
9 |
42 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
16,836 |
23,733 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
73,299 |
73,299 |
||
Amortization |
96,110 |
10,984 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
8,149 |
8,148 |
||
194,394 |
116,164 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(280,100) |
$ |
(415,632) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.08) |
$ |
(.12) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 35
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
40 |
$ |
192 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
40 |
192 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
14,850 |
12,869 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
54,590 |
44,590 |
||
Amortization |
18,072 |
32,309 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
8,007 |
8,026 |
||
95,519 |
97,794 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(254,563) |
$ |
(307,700) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.08) |
$ |
(.09) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 36
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
32 |
$ |
492 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
32 |
492 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
14,679 |
15,583 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
35,161 |
26,342 |
||
Amortization |
7,460 |
22,116 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
5,958 |
6,192 |
||
63,258 |
70,233 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(176,224) |
$ |
(189,198) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.08) |
$ |
(.09) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 37
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
758 |
$ |
2,262 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
758 |
2,262 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
12,197 |
14,503 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
43,198 |
43,216 |
||
Amortization |
29,562 |
23,706 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
7,448 |
7,943 |
||
92,405 |
89,368 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(198,492) |
$ |
(388,001) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.08) |
$ |
(.15) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 38
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
152 |
$ |
883 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
152 |
883 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
14,321 |
16,943 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
36,900 |
36,427 |
||
Amortization |
6,555 |
24,728 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
7,694 |
8,220 |
||
65,470 |
86,318 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(218,087) |
$ |
(193,057) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.08) |
$ |
(.08) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 39
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
157 |
$ |
1,343 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
157 |
1,343 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
13,574 |
19,133 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
24,000 |
4,806 |
||
Amortization |
5,518 |
22,581 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
7,052 |
7,590 |
||
50,144 |
54,110 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(196,765) |
$ |
(168,346) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.08) |
$ |
(.07) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 40
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
31 |
$ |
149 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
31 |
149 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
18,356 |
25,793 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
49,329 |
48,024 |
||
Amortization |
13,259 |
28,433 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
7,665 |
8,257 |
||
88,609 |
110,507 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(297,235) |
$ |
(292,075) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.11) |
$ |
(.11) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 41
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
25 |
$ |
118 |
Other income |
- |
28,635 |
||
25 |
28,753 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
21,396 |
26,923 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
51,480 |
51,383 |
||
Amortization |
70,691 |
33,481 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
8,933 |
9,493 |
||
152,500 |
121,280 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(344,639) |
$ |
(293,439) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.12) |
$ |
(.10) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 42
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
282 |
$ |
3,703 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
282 |
3,703 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
22,505 |
31,131 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
50,246 |
61,553 |
||
Amortization |
32,183 |
29,283 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
8,681 |
9,879 |
||
113,615 |
131,846 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(339,026) |
$ |
(274,742) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
(335,636) |
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.12) |
$ |
(.10) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 43
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
297 |
$ |
2,598 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
297 |
2,598 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
23,350 |
31,723 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
75,820 |
74,330 |
||
Amortization |
72,434 |
41,837 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
9,777 |
10,142 |
||
181,381 |
158,032 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(334,720) |
$ |
(370,052) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.09) |
$ |
(.10) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 44
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
516 |
$ |
6,195 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
516 |
6,195 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
13,998 |
19,263 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
56,179 |
55,548 |
||
Amortization |
73,533 |
28,252 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
8,141 |
8,765 |
||
151,851 |
111,828 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(376,209) |
$ |
(371,912) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
(372,447) |
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.14) |
$ |
(.14) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 45
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
364 |
$ |
6,729 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
364 |
6,729 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
31,619 |
36,060 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
87,604 |
80,104 |
||
Amortization |
72,026 |
36,221 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
10,526 |
12,093 |
||
201,775 |
164,478 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(530,835) |
$ |
(570,327) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.13) |
$ |
(.14) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 46
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
276 |
$ |
4,277 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
276 |
4,277 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
17,636 |
22,703 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
61,650 |
47,313 |
||
Amortization |
23,794 |
25,973 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
8,677 |
9,446 |
||
111,757 |
105,435 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(255,060) |
$ |
(297,924) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.08) |
$ |
(.10) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
18,502 |
$ |
84,744 |
Other income |
359,368 |
204,459 |
||
377,870 |
289,203 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
652,538 |
705,102 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
2,760,217 |
2,992,139 |
||
Amortization |
1,237,678 |
805,123 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
356,790 |
386,308 |
||
5,007,223 |
4,888,672 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(9,530,920) |
$ |
(14,066,111) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.11) |
$ |
(.17) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 20
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
1,179 |
$ |
2,509 |
Other income |
76,357 |
57,972 |
||
77,536 |
60,481 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
23,846 |
27,743 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
147,072 |
152,447 |
||
Amortization |
- |
1,786 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
15,655 |
15,309 |
||
186,573 |
197,285 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(109,037) |
$ |
(255,012) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.03) |
$ |
(.07) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 21
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
198 |
$ |
57 |
Other income |
5,056 |
1,235 |
||
5,254 |
1,292 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
17,021 |
18,692 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
11,215 |
83,793 |
||
Amortization |
- |
977 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
9,335 |
9,947 |
||
37,571 |
113,409 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
587,883 |
$ |
(165,271) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
.31 |
$ |
(.09) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 22
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
38 |
$ |
178 |
Other income |
9,215 |
15,262 |
||
9,253 |
15,440 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
27,890 |
28,321 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
117,372 |
114,567 |
||
Amortization |
- |
3,070 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
12,040 |
12,212 |
||
157,302 |
158,170 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(148,049) |
$ |
(160,341) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.06) |
$ |
(.06) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 23
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
74 |
$ |
330 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
74 |
330 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
22,601 |
26,501 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
106,382 |
107,382 |
||
Amortization |
- |
4,565 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
14,017 |
14,072 |
||
143,000 |
152,520 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(142,926) |
$ |
(132,203) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
(141,497) |
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.04) |
$ |
(.04) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 24
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
57 |
$ |
1,263 |
Other income |
57,584 |
34,107 |
||
57,641 |
35,370 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
24,716 |
26,962 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
69,322 |
88,506 |
||
Amortization |
- |
5,102 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
10,334 |
10,674 |
||
104,372 |
131,244 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
32,118 |
$ |
(138,216) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
31,797 |
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
.01 |
$ |
(.06) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 25
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
1,582 |
$ |
3,175 |
Other income |
101,139 |
54,696 |
||
102,721 |
57,871 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
26,432 |
34,803 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
58,261 |
87,626 |
||
Amortization |
5,714 |
7,609 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
12,438 |
16,533 |
||
102,845 |
146,571 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
29,251 |
$ |
(228,083) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
.01 |
$ |
(.07) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 26
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
495 |
$ |
2,792 |
Other income |
32,442 |
1,748 |
||
32,937 |
4,540 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
42,015 |
45,150 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
141,948 |
175,786 |
||
Amortization |
17,162 |
8,452 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
15,913 |
15,402 |
||
217,038 |
244,790 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
25,910 |
$ |
(413,717) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
.01 |
$ |
(.10) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 27
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
58 |
$ |
873 |
Other income |
165 |
703 |
||
223 |
1,576 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
21,009 |
24,302 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
47,478 |
118,268 |
||
Amortization |
34,246 |
7,827 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
10,281 |
10,615 |
||
113,014 |
161,012 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
177,926 |
$ |
(344,970) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
.07 |
$ |
(.14) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 28
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
1,199 |
$ |
1,146 |
Other income |
7,656 |
4,492 |
||
8,855 |
5,638 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
28,284 |
33,749 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
113,191 |
125,989 |
||
Amortization |
- |
1,650 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
14,973 |
15,356 |
||
156,448 |
176,744 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(414,474) |
$ |
(761,415) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.10) |
$ |
(.19) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 29
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
83 |
$ |
2,427 |
Other income |
5,241 |
- |
||
5,324 |
2,427 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
32,678 |
32,963 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
118,240 |
150,678 |
||
Amortization |
14,474 |
1,656 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
15,730 |
16,139 |
||
181,122 |
201,436 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(308,701) |
$ |
(775,051) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.08) |
$ |
(.19) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 30
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
2,060 |
$ |
2,387 |
Other income |
555 |
- |
||
2,615 |
2,387 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
23,924 |
28,077 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
86,511 |
71,861 |
||
Amortization |
52,170 |
10,619 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
11,515 |
11,887 |
||
174,120 |
122,444 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(289,642) |
$ |
(429,889) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.11) |
$ |
(.16) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 31
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
1,049 |
$ |
1,439 |
Other income |
5,923 |
5,609 |
||
6,972 |
7,048 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
30,438 |
33,086 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
168,017 |
162,226 |
||
Amortization |
- |
- |
||
General and administrative expenses |
15,048 |
16,897 |
||
213,503 |
212,209 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(586,312) |
$ |
(719,532) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.13) |
$ |
(.16) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 32
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
1,632 |
$ |
4,881 |
Other income |
26,648 |
- |
||
28,280 |
4,881 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
23,875 |
31,479 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
112,702 |
152,416 |
||
Amortization |
65,528 |
18,362 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
15,186 |
17,440 |
||
217,291 |
219,697 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(597,024) |
$ |
(1,080,862) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.12) |
$ |
(.23) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 33
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
511 |
$ |
533 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
511 |
533 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
17,097 |
15,622 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
74,712 |
81,982 |
||
Amortization |
5,990 |
13,638 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
10,409 |
11,349 |
||
108,208 |
122,591 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(250,718) |
$ |
(331,201) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.09) |
$ |
(.12) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 34
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
20 |
$ |
93 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
20 |
93 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
20,461 |
23,738 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
146,598 |
133,432 |
||
Amortization |
192,220 |
21,969 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
12,511 |
13,260 |
||
371,790 |
192,399 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(498,199) |
$ |
(764,157) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
(4,982) |
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.14) |
$ |
(.21) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 35
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
89 |
$ |
412 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
89 |
412 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
18,049 |
12,869 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
109,221 |
81,680 |
||
Amortization |
36,144 |
64,617 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
12,285 |
13,253 |
||
175,699 |
172,419 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(483,402) |
$ |
(607,681) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.15) |
$ |
(.18) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 36
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
72 |
$ |
1,017 |
Other income |
1,550 |
- |
||
1,622 |
1,017 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
17,878 |
15,582 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
60,873 |
43,558 |
||
Amortization |
14,920 |
44,231 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
9,434 |
10,375 |
||
103,105 |
113,746 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(300,018) |
$ |
(349,506) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
(297,018) |
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.14) |
$ |
(.16) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 37
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
1,627 |
$ |
4,702 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
1,627 |
4,702 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
14,826 |
14,502 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
91,914 |
91,932 |
||
Amortization |
59,124 |
47,411 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
12,052 |
13,836 |
||
177,916 |
167,681 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(458,656) |
$ |
(794,801) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
(4,587) |
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.18) |
$ |
(.31) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 38
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
410 |
$ |
1,802 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
410 |
1,802 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
17,376 |
16,942 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
59,469 |
77,527 |
||
Amortization |
13,110 |
49,456 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
12,515 |
14,244 |
||
102,470 |
158,169 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(402,314) |
$ |
(376,105) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.16) |
$ |
(.15) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 39
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
503 |
$ |
2,686 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
503 |
2,686 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
16,489 |
19,132 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
58,200 |
36,036 |
||
Amortization |
11,036 |
45,162 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
11,515 |
13,170 |
||
97,240 |
113,500 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(452,699) |
$ |
(409,119) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.20) |
$ |
(.18) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 40
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
70 |
$ |
325 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
70 |
325 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
22,267 |
25,792 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
95,008 |
94,468 |
||
Amortization |
26,518 |
56,864 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
12,643 |
13,959 |
||
156,436 |
191,083 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(548,065) |
$ |
(539,651) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.21) |
$ |
(.20) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 41
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
54 |
$ |
232 |
Other income |
29,378 |
28,635 |
||
29,432 |
28,867 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
26,021 |
26,922 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
94,212 |
104,019 |
||
Amortization |
141,382 |
66,963 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
14,615 |
15,687 |
||
276,230 |
213,591 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(602,109) |
$ |
(552,705) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.21) |
$ |
(.19) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 42
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
799 |
$ |
8,302 |
Other income |
459 |
- |
||
1,258 |
8,302 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
27,624 |
31,132 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
109,679 |
123,465 |
||
Amortization |
64,366 |
58,567 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
15,124 |
15,907 |
||
216,793 |
229,071 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(660,887) |
$ |
(576,860) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.24) |
$ |
(.21) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 43
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
567 |
$ |
5,069 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
567 |
5,069 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
29,293 |
31,724 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
148,150 |
149,029 |
||
Amortization |
144,868 |
83,675 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
15,942 |
18,750 |
||
338,253 |
283,178 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(782,317) |
$ |
(804,468) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
(7,823) |
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.21) |
$ |
(.22) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 44
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
1,681 |
$ |
12,708 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
1,681 |
12,708 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
17,054 |
19,262 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
126,355 |
126,364 |
||
Amortization |
147,067 |
56,508 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
13,470 |
14,835 |
||
303,946 |
216,969 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(800,370) |
$ |
(691,738) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
(8,004) |
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.29) |
$ |
(.25) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 45
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
1,424 |
$ |
14,480 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
1,424 |
14,480 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
41,077 |
37,352 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
164,083 |
152,700 |
||
Amortization |
144,052 |
72,442 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
17,572 |
19,484 |
||
366,784 |
281,978 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(1,029,633) |
$ |
(1,087,131) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.25) |
$ |
(.27) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 46
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Income |
||||
Interest income |
$ |
971 |
$ |
8,926 |
Other income |
- |
- |
||
971 |
8,926 |
|||
Share of income (loss) from |
|
|
||
Expenses |
||||
Professional fees |
22,297 |
22,703 |
||
Fund management fee (Note C) |
124,032 |
104,402 |
||
Amortization |
47,587 |
51,945 |
||
General and administrative expenses |
14,238 |
15,716 |
||
208,154 |
194,766 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(518,456) |
$ |
(576,426) |
Net income (loss) allocated to assignees |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to general |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per BAC |
$ |
(.17) |
$ |
(.19) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income (loss) |
(9,435,612) |
(95,308) |
(9,530,920) |
|||||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 20 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(107,947) |
(1,090) |
(109,037) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 21 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
582,004 |
5,879 |
587,883 |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 22 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(146,569) |
(1,480) |
(148,049) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 23 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(141,497) |
(1,429) |
(142,926) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 24 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
31,797 |
321 |
32,118 |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 25 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
28,958 |
293 |
29,251 |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PRTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 26 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
25,651 |
259 |
25,910 |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 27 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
176,147 |
1,779 |
177,926 |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
||||
Series 28 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(410,329) |
(4,145) |
(414,474) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PRTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 29 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(305,614) |
(3,087) |
(308,701) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 30 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(286,746) |
(2,896) |
(289,642) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 31 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(580,449) |
(5,863) |
(586,312) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 32 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(591,054) |
(5,970) |
(597,024) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 33 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(248,211) |
(2,507) |
(250,718) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 34 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(493,217) |
(4,982) |
(498,199) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 35 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(478,568) |
(4,834) |
(483,402) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 36 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(297,018) |
(3,000) |
(300,018) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 37 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(454,069) |
(4,587) |
(458,656) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 38 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(398,291) |
(4,023) |
(402,314) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 39 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(448,172) |
(4,527) |
(452,699) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 40 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(542,584) |
(5,481) |
(548,065) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 41 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(596,088) |
(6,021) |
(602,109) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 42 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(654,278) |
(6,609) |
(660,887) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 43 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(774,494) |
(7,823) |
(782,317) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (DEFICIT)
Six months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 44 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(792,366) |
(8,004) |
(800,370) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|||
Series 45 |
||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(1,019,337) |
(10,296) |
(1,029,633) |
|||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
||||
Series 46 |
|||||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
(513,271) |
(5,185) |
(518,456) |
||||
Partners' capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(9,530,920) |
$ |
(14,066,111) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
1,237,678 |
805,123 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
6,181,988 |
6,849,444 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
5,998,048 |
$ |
5,937,051 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 20
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(109,037) |
$ |
(255,012) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
- |
1,786 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
174,531 |
168,406 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
143,746 |
$ |
151,883 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 21
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
587,883 |
$ |
(165,271) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
- |
977 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
15,500 |
6,279 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
378,260 |
$ |
5,009 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 22
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(148,049) |
$ |
(160,341) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
- |
3,070 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(16,669) |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
77,660 |
81,744 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
60,991 |
$ |
74,379 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 23
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(142,926) |
$ |
(132,203) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
- |
4,565 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
- |
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
34,902 |
40,491 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
17,522 |
$ |
18,031 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 24
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
32,118 |
$ |
(138,216) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
- |
5,102 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
- |
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
78,849 |
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
119,321 |
135,973 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
187,637 |
$ |
124,476 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 25
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
29,251 |
$ |
(228,083) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
5,714 |
7,609 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
- |
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
38,836 |
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
166,596 |
187,189 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
292,166 |
$ |
216,880 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 26
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
25,910 |
$ |
(413,717) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
17,162 |
8,452 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
1,140 |
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
366,614 |
202,820 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
221,491 |
$ |
245,271 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 27
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
177,926 |
$ |
(344,970) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
34,246 |
7,827 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
70,346 |
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
109,954 |
87,690 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
180,300 |
$ |
98,689 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 28
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(414,474) |
$ |
(761,415) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
- |
1,650 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
54,840 |
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
192,128 |
185,940 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
233,495 |
$ |
163,001 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 29
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(308,701) |
$ |
(775,051) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
14,474 |
1,656 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
934 |
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
137,986 |
174,993 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
142,364 |
$ |
147,183 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 30
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(289,642) |
$ |
(429,889) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
52,170 |
10,619 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
32,181 |
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
264,094 |
276,205 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
239,052 |
$ |
266,653 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 31
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(586,312) |
$ |
(719,532) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
- |
- |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
4,233 |
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
182,803 |
258,422 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
158,824 |
$ |
184,213 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 32
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(597,024) |
$ |
(1,080,862) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
65,528 |
18,362 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
237,567 |
306,548 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
271,841 |
$ |
249,685 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 33
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(250,718) |
$ |
(331,201) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
5,990 |
13,638 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(5,112) |
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
179,652 |
186,282 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
174,540 |
$ |
176,487 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 34
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(498,199) |
$ |
(764,157) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
192,220 |
21,969 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(26,881) |
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
72,369 |
66,702 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
45,488 |
$ |
49,288 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 35
2009 |
2008 |
||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(483,402) |
$ |
(607,681) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
|||||
Amortization |
36,144 |
64,617 |
|||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
|||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
|||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
|||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
|||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
114,180 |
|
|||
- |
- |
||||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(22,827) |
|
|||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
|||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
|||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
|||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
118,051 |
148,626 |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
95,224 |
$ |
124,588 |
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 36
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(300,018) |
$ |
(349,506) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
14,920 |
44,231 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
16,746 |
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
101,615 |
97,695 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
118,361 |
$ |
95,025 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 37
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(458,656) |
$ |
(794,801) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
59,124 |
47,411 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
- |
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
77,432 |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
20,871 |
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
272,497 |
305,864 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
293,368 |
$ |
287,996 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 38
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(402,314) |
$ |
(376,105) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
13,110 |
49,456 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
- |
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
32,200 |
|
||
- |
- |
|||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
(25,369) |
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(25,369) |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
261,393 |
133,521 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
236,024 |
$ |
243,105 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 39
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(452,699) |
$ |
(409,119) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
11,036 |
45,162 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
18,400 |
43,400 |
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(60,883) |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
239,921 |
158,655 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
179,038 |
$ |
234,980 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 40
2009 |
2008 |
||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(548,065) |
$ |
(539,651) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
|||||
Amortization |
26,518 |
56,864 |
|||
Distributions from Operating |
|
|
|||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
348,893 |
|||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
|||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
|||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
|||
- |
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
|||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
|||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
|||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
|||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
127,519 |
142,164 |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
106,101 |
$ |
108,662 |
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 41
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(602,109) |
$ |
(552,705) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
141,382 |
66,963 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
5,176 |
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
131,719 |
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
40,375 |
21,723 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
71,019 |
$ |
29,541 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 42
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(660,887) |
$ |
(576,860) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
64,366 |
58,567 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
150 |
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
445,352 |
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
|
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
42,769 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
359,855 |
649,411 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
402,624 |
$ |
366,416 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 43
2009 |
2008 |
||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(782,317) |
$ |
(804,468) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
|||||
Amortization |
144,868 |
83,675 |
|||
Distributions from Operating |
1,657 |
|
|||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
444,631 |
|
|||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
|||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
117,628 |
|
|||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
153,390 |
|
|||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
79,857 |
|
|||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
|||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
|||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
|||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
185,952 |
343,255 |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
265,809 |
$ |
133,197 |
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 44
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(800,370) |
$ |
(691,738) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
147,067 |
56,508 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
- |
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
498,105 |
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
- |
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
(32,648) |
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
(187,846) |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
791,833 |
864,250 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
603,987 |
$ |
757,410 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 45
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(1,029,633) |
$ |
(1,087,131) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
144,052 |
72,442 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
24,436 |
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
- |
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
(91,718) |
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
871,105 |
1,030,160 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
582,515 |
$ |
881,697 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 46
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(518,456) |
$ |
(576,426) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income |
||||
Amortization |
47,587 |
51,945 |
||
Distributions from Operating |
898 |
|
||
Share of (Income) Loss from |
311,273 |
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in other |
- |
|
||
(Decrease) Increase in accounts |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||
Capital contributions paid to |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of operating |
|
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by |
|
|
||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND |
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
480,195 |
588,436 |
||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ |
296,261 |
$ |
503,306 |
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
|||||
The Fund applied notes receivable and advances to its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund has increased (decreased) its investments in operating limited partnerships and increased (decreased) its capital contribution obligation to operating limited partnerships for capital contributions due to operating limited partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE A - ORGANIZATION
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. (the "Fund") was organized under the laws of the State of Delaware as of October 5, 1993, for the purpose of acquiring, holding, and disposing of limited partnership interests in operating partnerships which will acquire, develop, rehabilitate, operate and own newly constructed, existing or rehabilitated low-income apartment complexes ("Operating Partnerships"). Effective as of June 1, 2001 there was a restructuring and, as a result, the Fund's general partner was reorganized as follows. The general partner of the Fund continues to be Boston Capital Associates IV L.P., a Delaware limited partnership. The general partner of the general partner of the Fund is now BCA Associates Limited Partnership, a Massachusetts limited partnership, whose sole general partner is C&M Management, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation and whose limited partners are Herbert F. Collins and John P. Manning. Mr. Manning is the principal of Boston Capital Partners, Inc. The limited partner of the general partner of the Fund is Capital Investment Holdings, a general partnership whose partners are various officers and employees of Boston Capital Partners, Inc. and its affiliates. The assignor limited partner is BCTC IV Assignor Corp., a Delaware corporation which is now wholly-owned by John P. Manning.
Pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, the Fund filed a Form S-11 Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, effective December 16, 1993, which covered the offering (the "Public Offering") of the Fund's beneficial assignee certificates ("BACs") representing assignments of units of the beneficial interest of the limited partnership interest of the assignor limited partner. The Fund registered 30,000,000 BACs at $10 per BAC for sale to the public in one or more series. On April 18, 1996, an amendment to Form S-11 which registered an additional 10,000,000 BACs for sale to the public in one or more series became effective. On April 2, 1998, an amendment to Form S-11, which registered an additional 25,000,000 BACs for sale to the public in one or more series, became effective. On August 31, 1999, an amendment to Form S-11, which registered an additional 8,000,000 BACs for sale to the public in one or more series, became effective. On July 26, 2000, an amendment to Form S-11, which registered an additional 7,500,000 BACs for sale to the public in one or more series, became effective. On July 24, 2001, an amendment to Form S-11, which registered an additional 7,000,000 BACs for sale to the public in one or more series, became effective. On July 24, 2002 an amendment to Form S-11, which registered an additional 7,000,000 BACs for sale to the public, became effective. On July 1, 2003 an amendment to Form S-11, which registered an additional 7,000,000 BACs for sale to the public, became effective.
Below is a summary of the BACs sold and total equity raised by series as of the date of this filing:
Series |
Closing Date |
BACs Sold |
Equity Raised |
Series 20 |
June 24, 1994 |
3,866,700 |
$38,667,000 |
Series 21 |
December 31, 1994 |
1,892,700 |
$18,927,000 |
Series 22 |
December 28, 1994 |
2,564,400 |
$25,644,000 |
Series 23 |
June 23, 1995 |
3,336,727 |
$33,366,000 |
Series 24 |
September 22, 1995 |
2,169,878 |
$21,697,000 |
Series 25 |
December 29, 1995 |
3,026,109 |
$30,248,000 |
Series 26 |
June 25, 1996 |
3,995,900 |
$39,959,000 |
Series 27 |
September 17, 1996 |
2,460,700 |
$24,607,000 |
Series 28 |
January 29, 1997 |
4,000,738 |
$39,999,000 |
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE A - ORGANIZATION (continued)
Series |
Closing Date |
BACs Sold |
Equity Raised |
Series 29 |
June 10, 1997 |
3,991,800 |
$39,918,000 |
Series 30 |
September 10, 1997 |
2,651,000 |
$26,490,750 |
Series 31 |
January 18, 1998 |
4,417,857 |
$44,057,750 |
Series 32 |
June 23, 1998 |
4,754,198 |
$47,431,000 |
Series 33 |
September 21, 1998 |
2,636,533 |
$26,362,000 |
Series 34 |
February 11, 1999 |
3,529,319 |
$35,273,000 |
Series 35 |
June 28, 1999 |
3,300,463 |
$33,004,630 |
Series 36 |
September 28, 1999 |
2,106,837 |
$21,068,375 |
Series 37 |
January 28, 2000 |
2,512,500 |
$25,125,000 |
Series 38 |
July 31, 2000 |
2,543,100 |
$25,431,000 |
Series 39 |
January 31, 2001 |
2,292,152 |
$22,921,000 |
Series 40 |
July 31, 2001 |
2,630,256 |
$26,269,256 |
Series 41 |
January 31, 2002 |
2,891,626 |
$28,916,260 |
Series 42 |
July 31, 2002 |
2,744,262 |
$27,442,620 |
Series 43 |
December 31, 2002 |
3,637,987 |
$36,379,870 |
Series 44 |
April 30, 2003 |
2,701,973 |
$27,019,730 |
Series 45 |
September 16, 2003 |
4,014,367 |
$40,143,670 |
Series 46 |
December 19, 2003 |
2,980,998 |
$29,809,980 |
The Fund concluded its public offering of BACs in the Fund on December 19, 2003.
NOTE B - ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING POLICIES
The condensed financial statements herein as of September 30, 2009 and for the six months then ended have been prepared by the Fund, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Fund accounts for its investments in Operating Partnerships using the equity method, whereby the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. Costs incurred by the Fund in acquiring the investments in the Operating Partnerships are capitalized to the investment account.
The Fund's accounting and financial reporting policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and include adjustments in interim periods considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to these rules and regulations. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Fund's Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
Amortization
Acquisition costs were amortized on the straight-line method over 27.5 years. As of March 31, 2009, an impairment of $16,813,106 was recorded and the lives of the remaining acquisition costs were reassessed. The life of the remaining acquisition costs were reassessed and determined to be in the range of 2 - 8 years.
Accumulated amortization of acquisition costs by Series as of September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
2009 |
2008 |
|
$ - |
$ 33,935 |
|
Series 21 |
- |
18,562 |
Series 22 |
- |
58,329 |
Series 23 |
- |
82,415 |
Series 24 |
- |
96,942 |
Series 25 |
5,714 |
97,358 |
Series 26 |
17,162 |
162,826 |
Series 27 |
182,164 |
141,994 |
Series 28 |
- |
31,351 |
Series 29 |
47,446 |
31,317 |
Series 30 |
52,170 |
201,630 |
Series 32 |
65,528 |
287,488 |
Series 33 |
5,990 |
258,231 |
Series 34 |
621,449 |
410,097 |
Series 35 |
36,144 |
1,163,504 |
Series 36 |
14,920 |
794,439 |
Series 37 |
59,124 |
761,600 |
Series 38 |
13,110 |
671,288 |
Series 39 |
11,036 |
592,508 |
Series 40 |
26,518 |
584,161 |
Series 41 |
141,382 |
749,854 |
Series 42 |
64,366 |
621,222 |
Series 43 |
135,920 |
805,468 |
Series 44 |
674,273 |
482,036 |
Series 45 |
144,052 |
558,667 |
Series 46 |
39,964 |
395,955 |
$2,358,432 |
$10,093,177 |
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE C - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Fund has entered into several transactions with various affiliates of the general partner of the Fund, including Boston Capital Holdings Limited Partnership, Boston Capital Securities, Inc., and Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership as follows:
An annual fund management fee of .5 percent of the aggregate cost of all apartment complexes owned by the Operating Partnerships has been accrued to Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership. Since reporting fees collected by the various series were added to reserves and not paid to Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership, the amounts accrued are not net of reporting fees received. The fund management fees accrued for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, are as follows:
2009 |
2008 |
|
Series 20 |
$ 84,438 |
$ 84,438 |
Series 21 |
35,034 |
45,093 |
Series 22 |
63,648 |
63,648 |
Series 23 |
60,066 |
60,066 |
Series 24 |
48,150 |
56,934 |
Series 25 |
57,771 |
68,169 |
Series 26 |
102,862 |
108,689 |
Series 27 |
78,801 |
78,801 |
Series 28 |
83,529 |
83,529 |
Series 29 |
82,851 |
84,495 |
Series 30 |
46,543 |
46,543 |
Series 31 |
91,038 |
91,038 |
Series 32 |
79,276 |
82,086 |
Series 33 |
41,059 |
43,491 |
Series 34 |
73,299 |
73,299 |
Series 35 |
57,090 |
57,090 |
Series 36 |
40,149 |
40,149 |
Series 37 |
51,216 |
51,216 |
Series 38 |
41,100 |
41,100 |
Series 39 |
34,200 |
34,200 |
Series 40 |
50,004 |
50,004 |
Series 41 |
61,708 |
61,708 |
Series 42 |
63,080 |
63,080 |
Series 43 |
76,695 |
76,695 |
Series 44 |
71,176 |
71,176 |
Series 45 |
91,641 |
91,641 |
Series 46 |
62,382 |
62,382 |
$1,728,806 |
$1,770,760 |
|
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE C - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
The fund management fees paid for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
2009 |
2008 |
|
$ 50,000 |
$ 50,000 |
|
Series 21 |
500,000 |
- |
Series 24 |
75,000 |
50,000 |
Series 25 |
50,000 |
50,000 |
Series 26 |
200,000 |
50,000 |
Series 28 |
25,000 |
75,000 |
Series 30 |
- |
25,000 |
Series 31 |
- |
50,000 |
Series 32 |
- |
25,000 |
Series 35 |
- |
25,000 |
Series 36 |
- |
25,000 |
Series 37 |
- |
25,000 |
Series 38 |
50,000 |
25,000 |
Series 39 |
50,000 |
25,000 |
Series 42 |
50,000 |
125,000 |
Series 43 |
- |
50,000 |
Series 44 |
175,000 |
50,000 |
Series 45 |
275,000 |
150,000 |
Series 46 |
150,000 |
75,000 |
$1,650,000 |
$ 950,000 |
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS
At September 30, 2009 and 2008 the Fund has limited partnership interests in 502 and 510 Operating Partnerships, respectively, which own or are constructing apartment complexes.
The breakdown of Operating Partnerships within the Fund at September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
2009 |
2008 |
|
Series 20 |
22 |
22 |
Series 21 |
12 |
13 |
Series 22 |
29 |
29 |
Series 23 |
22 |
22 |
Series 24 |
22 |
24 |
Series 25 |
20 |
22 |
Series 26 |
43 |
45 |
Series 27 |
16 |
16 |
Series 28 |
26 |
26 |
Series 29 |
21 |
21 |
Series 30 |
18 |
18 |
Series 31 |
26 |
26 |
Series 32 |
16 |
16 |
Series 33 |
10 |
10 |
Series 34 |
14 |
14 |
Series 35 |
11 |
11 |
Series 36 |
11 |
11 |
Series 37 |
7 |
7 |
Series 38 |
10 |
10 |
Series 39 |
9 |
9 |
Series 40 |
16 |
16 |
Series 41 |
21 |
21 |
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
Series 42 |
22 |
23 |
Series 43 |
23 |
23 |
Series 44 |
10 |
10 |
Series 45 |
30 |
30 |
Series 46 |
15 |
15 |
502 |
510 |
|
Under the terms of the Fund's investment in each Operating Partnership, the Fund is required to make capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships. These contributions are payable in installments over several years upon each Operating Partnership achieving specified levels of construction and/or operations. The contributions payable at September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
2009 |
2008 |
|
$ - |
$ 236,479 |
|
Series 22 |
9,352 |
9,352 |
Series 24 |
9,999 |
9,999 |
Series 25 |
10,001 |
61,733 |
Series 26 |
14,490 |
29,490 |
Series 27 |
39,749 |
39,749 |
Series 28 |
40,968 |
40,968 |
Series 29 |
10,197 |
45,783 |
Series 30 |
127,396 |
127,396 |
Series 31 |
66,294 |
66,294 |
Series 32 |
173,561 |
298,561 |
Series 33 |
69,154 |
194,154 |
Series 34 |
- |
8,244 |
Series 37 |
138,438 |
138,438 |
Series 40 |
102 |
8,694 |
Series 41 |
100 |
100 |
Series 42 |
452,937 |
452,937 |
Series 43 |
307,738 |
307,738 |
Series 44 |
590,561 |
568,952 |
Series 45 |
16,724 |
16,724 |
Series 46 |
20,138 |
20,138 |
$2,097,899 |
$2,681,923 |
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENT IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS - (continued)
During the six months ended September 30, 2009 the Fund disposed of eight Operating Partnerships. A summary of the dispositions by Series for September 30, 2009 is as follows:
Operating Partnership Interest Transferred |
Sale of Underlying Operating Partnership |
Partnership Proceeds from Disposition |
Gain/(Loss) on Disposition |
||||||
Series 21 |
1 |
- |
$ |
718,078 |
$ |
620,200 |
|||
Series 24 |
1 |
1 |
78,849 |
78,849 |
|||||
Series 25 |
2 |
- |
38,836 |
38,836 |
|||||
Series 26 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
|||||
Series 42 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
|||||
Total |
6 |
2 |
$ |
835,763 |
$ |
737,885 |
During the six months ended September 30, 2008 the Fund did not dispose of any Operating Partnerships.
The gain (loss) described above is for financial statement purposes only. There are significant differences between the equity method of accounting and the tax reporting of income and losses from Operating Partnership investments. The largest difference is the ability, for tax purposes, to deduct losses in excess of the Fund's investment in the Operating Partnership. As a result, the amount of gain recognized for tax purposes may be significantly higher than the gain recorded in the financial statements.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENT IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS - (continued)
The Fund's fiscal year ends March 31st for each year, while all the Operating Partnerships' fiscal years are the calendar year. Pursuant to the provisions of each Operating Partnership Agreement, financial results for each of the Operating Partnerships are provided to the Fund within 45 days after the close of each Operating Partnership's quarterly period. Accordingly, the current financial results available for the Operating Partnerships are for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
82,177,474 |
$ |
82,674,694 |
Interest and other |
3,167,128 |
3,958,024 |
||
85,344,602 |
86,632,718 |
|||
|
||||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
19,703,364 |
21,463,756 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
24,834,303 |
25,440,316 |
||
Operating expenses |
53,705,789 |
52,361,439 |
||
98,243,456 |
99,265,511 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(12,898,854) |
$ |
(12,632,793) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $7,130,412 and $3,159,393 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENT IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS - (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 20
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
4,835,711 |
$ |
4,767,057 |
Interest and other |
281,627 |
526,738 |
||
5,117,338 |
5,293,795 |
|||
|
||||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
1,236,004 |
1,260,076 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,181,484 |
1,183,812 |
||
Operating expenses |
3,178,887 |
3,034,215 |
||
5,596,375 |
5,478,103 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(479,037) |
$ |
(184,308) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $474,247 and $64,257 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 21
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
1,817,685 |
$ |
2,125,710 |
Interest and other |
44,885 |
145,666 |
||
1,862,570 |
2,271,376 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
500,130 |
623,207 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
408,867 |
445,098 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,100,994 |
1,436,346 |
||
2,009,991 |
2,504,651 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(147,421) |
$ |
(233,275) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $145,947 and $177,788 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 22
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
2,976,107 |
$ |
2,967,227 |
Interest and other |
191,864 |
177,432 |
||
3,167,971 |
3,144,659 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
595,122 |
647,061 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
884,412 |
916,786 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,249,000 |
2,167,234 |
||
3,728,534 |
3,731,081 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(560,563) |
$ |
(586,422) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $554,957 and $562,947 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 23
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
3,304,040 |
$ |
3,318,444 |
Interest and other |
174,265 |
138,913 |
||
3,478,305 |
3,457,357 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
783,636 |
790,740 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
772,842 |
839,662 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,380,242 |
2,310,130 |
||
3,936,720 |
3,940,532 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(458,415) |
$ |
(483,175) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $453,830 and $498,329 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 24
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
2,590,764 |
$ |
2,727,086 |
Interest and other |
51,677 |
58,155 |
||
2,642,441 |
2,785,241 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
621,971 |
683,007 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
820,656 |
781,014 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,744,377 |
1,818,769 |
||
3,187,004 |
3,282,790 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(544,563) |
$ |
(497,549) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $539,117 and $450,232 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 25
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
4,747,644 |
$ |
4,604,740 |
Interest and other |
63,121 |
148,115 |
||
4,810,765 |
4,752,855 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
955,413 |
1,082,760 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,116,102 |
1,009,254 |
||
Operating expenses |
3,078,331 |
3,170,239 |
||
5,149,846 |
5,262,253 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(339,081) |
$ |
(509,398) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
(504,304) |
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $326,229 and $364,921 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 26
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
5,468,742 |
$ |
5,538,619 |
Interest and other |
170,105 |
235,039 |
||
5,638,847 |
5,773,658 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
1,077,705 |
1,084,153 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,313,636 |
1,431,429 |
||
Operating expenses |
3,630,162 |
3,588,687 |
||
6,021,503 |
6,104,269 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(382,656) |
$ |
(330,611) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $588,840 and $153,838 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 27
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
4,065,202 |
$ |
3,889,082 |
Interest and other |
70,011 |
69,394 |
||
4,135,213 |
3,958,476 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
1,053,575 |
1,319,337 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
853,345 |
859,059 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,069,973 |
1,968,376 |
||
3,976,893 |
4,146,772 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
158,320 |
$ |
(188,296) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $133,980 and $979 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 28
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Rental |
$ |
3,389,419 |
$ |
3,354,751 |
Interest and other |
86,614 |
96,359 |
||
3,476,033 |
3,451,110 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
718,079 |
716,487 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,119,563 |
1,179,400 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,485,723 |
2,170,899 |
||
4,323,365 |
4,066,786 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(847,332) |
$ |
(615,676) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $571,978 and $19,210 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 29
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
3,449,501 |
$ |
3,352,329 |
Interest and other |
190,758 |
195,979 |
||
3,640,259 |
3,548,308 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
919,128 |
1,012,042 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,208,537 |
1,217,456 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,519,738 |
2,313,299 |
||
4,647,403 |
4,542,797 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(1,007,144) |
$ |
(994,489) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
(984,544) |
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $864,170 and $408,502 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 30
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
2,582,814 |
$ |
2,505,015 |
Interest and other |
54,603 |
84,450 |
||
2,637,417 |
2,589,465 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
444,372 |
479,466 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
609,718 |
577,849 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,938,047 |
1,845,113 |
||
2,992,137 |
2,902,428 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(354,720) |
$ |
(312,963) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
(309,832) |
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $233,036 and $- for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 31
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
4,911,837 |
$ |
5,087,123 |
Interest and other |
179,290 |
236,094 |
||
5,091,127 |
5,323,217 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
983,942 |
1,098,199 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,546,932 |
1,554,659 |
||
Operating expenses |
3,354,519 |
3,197,849 |
||
5,885,393 |
5,850,707 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(794,266) |
$ |
(527,490) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
(522,215) |
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $406,542 and $7,844 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 32
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
3,103,707 |
$ |
2,952,767 |
Interest and other |
142,320 |
118,104 |
||
3,246,027 |
3,070,871 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
742,637 |
807,034 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,222,298 |
1,292,410 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,014,860 |
1,773,445 |
||
3,979,795 |
3,872,889 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(733,768) |
$ |
(802,018) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
(793,998) |
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 33
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
1,736,651 |
$ |
1,713,896 |
Interest and other |
52,179 |
67,732 |
||
1,788,830 |
1,781,628 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
471,597 |
475,316 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
587,231 |
594,949 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,071,653 |
957,464 |
||
2,130,481 |
2,027,729 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(341,651) |
$ |
(246,101) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
(243,640) |
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $195,213 and $34,497 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 34
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
3,003,342 |
$ |
3,026,611 |
Interest and other |
172,675 |
173,619 |
||
3,176,017 |
3,200,230 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
826,039 |
920,754 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,075,667 |
1,124,672 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,771,401 |
1,751,880 |
||
3,673,107 |
3,797,306 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(497,090) |
$ |
(597,076) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $365,690 and $19,254 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 35
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
2,263,098 |
$ |
2,680,710 |
Interest and other |
85,270 |
135,972 |
||
2,348,368 |
2,816,682 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
542,097 |
710,988 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
777,174 |
917,671 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,491,324 |
1,718,699 |
||
2,810,595 |
3,347,358 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(462,227) |
$ |
(530,676) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $149,813 and $89,695 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 36
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
1,716,873 |
$ |
1,584,415 |
Interest and other |
56,221 |
60,422 |
||
1,773,094 |
1,644,837 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
443,559 |
489,903 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
535,526 |
481,713 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,017,963 |
915,954 |
||
1,997,048 |
1,887,570 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(223,954) |
$ |
(242,733) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $23,179 and $3,529 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 37
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
2,260,259 |
$ |
2,215,253 |
Interest and other |
93,694 |
89,767 |
||
2,353,953 |
2,305,020 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
464,721 |
644,715 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
801,538 |
769,583 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,584,474 |
1,528,926 |
||
2,850,733 |
2,943,224 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(496,780) |
$ |
(638,204) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
(4,968) |
|
|
* Amounts include $209,445 and $- for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 38
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
1,668,803 |
$ |
1,681,368 |
Interest and other |
58,715 |
79,284 |
||
1,727,518 |
1,760,652 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
406,008 |
406,663 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
552,516 |
589,998 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,072,280 |
985,949 |
||
2,030,804 |
1,982,610 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(303,286) |
$ |
(221,958) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 39
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
1,212,424 |
$ |
1,243,465 |
Interest and other |
78,543 |
116,608 |
||
1,290,967 |
1,360,073 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
260,070 |
286,970 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
477,496 |
496,046 |
||
Operating expenses |
912,959 |
878,374 |
||
1,650,525 |
1,661,390 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(359,558) |
$ |
(301,317) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 40
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
1,620,596 |
$ |
1,846,054 |
Interest and other |
80,011 |
109,892 |
||
1,700,607 |
1,955,946 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
381,103 |
471,620 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
610,644 |
642,942 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,104,515 |
1,193,800 |
||
2,096,262 |
2,308,362 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(395,655) |
$ |
(352,416) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 41
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
2,689,780 |
$ |
2,555,847 |
Interest and other |
100,275 |
100,960 |
||
2,790,055 |
2,656,807 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
842,992 |
822,075 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
842,891 |
861,689 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,510,027 |
1,437,186 |
||
3,195,910 |
3,120,950 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(405,855) |
$ |
(464,143) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $46,485 and $91,521 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 42
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
2,895,350 |
$ |
2,867,130 |
Interest and other |
126,681 |
103,395 |
||
3,022,031 |
2,970,525 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
739,661 |
730,745 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
882,105 |
928,371 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,022,677 |
1,759,311 |
||
3,644,443 |
3,418,427 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(622,412) |
$ |
(447,902) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
(6,224) |
|
|
* Amounts include $170,836 and $87,332 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 43
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
3,352,187 |
$ |
3,299,532 |
Interest and other |
129,586 |
108,487 |
||
3,481,773 |
3,408,019 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
785,861 |
679,336 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,183,840 |
1,241,826 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,135,385 |
2,086,172 |
||
4,105,086 |
4,007,334 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(623,313) |
$ |
(599,315) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
(593,322) |
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $172,449 and $66,963 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 44
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
3,566,931 |
$ |
3,913,054 |
Interest and other |
134,878 |
283,586 |
||
3,701,809 |
4,196,640 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
1,013,799 |
1,253,377 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,235,926 |
1,211,209 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,085,247 |
2,224,455 |
||
4,334,972 |
4,689,041 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(633,163) |
$ |
(492,401) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
|
|
* Amounts include $128,726 and $- for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 45
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
4,470,953 |
$ |
4,409,117 |
Interest and other |
193,935 |
212,832 |
||
4,664,888 |
4,621,949 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
1,150,841 |
1,208,722 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,558,879 |
1,547,218 |
||
Operating expenses |
2,684,015 |
2,704,359 |
||
5,393,735 |
5,460,299 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(728,847) |
$ |
(838,350) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. * |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
|
$ |
|
* Amounts include $57,286 and $10,333 for 2009 and 2008, respectively, of loss not recognized under the equity method of accounting.
The Fund accounts for its investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Fund adjusts its investment cost for its share of each Operating Partnership's results of operations and for any distributions received or accrued. However, the Fund recognizes individual operating losses only to the extent of capital contributions. Excess losses are suspended for use in future years to offset excess income.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE D - INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (continued)
COMBINED SUMMARIZED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months Ended June 30,
(Unaudited)
Series 46
2009 |
2008 |
|||
Revenues |
||||
Rental |
$ |
2,477,054 |
$ |
2,448,292 |
Interest and other |
103,325 |
85,030 |
||
2,580,379 |
2,533,322 |
|||
Expenses |
||||
Interest |
743,302 |
759,003 |
||
Depreciation and amortization |
654,478 |
744,541 |
||
Operating expenses |
1,497,016 |
1,424,309 |
||
2,894,796 |
2,927,853 |
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
(314,417) |
$ |
(394,531) |
Net income (loss) allocated to Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. |
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to other Partners |
|
(3,144) |
|
|
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
NOTE E - TAXABLE LOSS
The Fund's taxable loss for calendar year ended December 31, 2009 is expected to differ from its loss for financial reporting purposes. This is primarily due to accounting differences in depreciation incurred by the Operating Partnerships and also differences between the equity method of accounting and the IRS accounting methods. No provision or benefit for income taxes has been included in these financial statements since taxable income or loss passes through to, and is reportable by, the partners and assignees individually.
NOTE F - SUBSEQUENT EVENT
The Fund has evaluated subsequent events through the date that the financial statements were issued, which was November 16, 2009, the date of the Funds's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009.
The Fund has entered into an agreement to sell the interest in one Operating Partnership. The estimated sale price and other terms for the disposition of the Operating Partnership have been determined. The estimated proceeds to be received for the Operating Partnership is $937,226. The estimated gain on sale of the Operating Partnership is $872,226 and the sale is expected to be recognized in the third quarter of fiscal year end 2010.
Item 2. Management's Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements including our intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations, strategies and predictions of our future activities, or other future events or conditions. These statements are "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbors created by these acts. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty, including, for example, the factors identified in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying these forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in these forward-looking statements, the inclusion of this information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved.
Liquidity
The Fund's primary source of funds is the proceeds of the Public Offering. Other sources of liquidity will include (i) interest earned on capital contributions held pending investment and on working capital and (ii) cash distributions from operations of the Operating Partnerships in which the Fund has and will invest. The Fund does not anticipate significant cash distributions from operations of the Operating Partnerships.
The Fund is currently accruing the fund management fee. Fund management fees accrued during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 were $1,728,806 and total fund management fees accrued as of September 30, 2009 were $46,441,868. During the six months ended September 30, 2009, $1,650,000 of accrued fund management fees were paid. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, these liabilities will be deferred until the Fund receives proceeds from sales of the Operating Partnerships that will be used to satisfy these liabilities. The Fund's working capital and sources of liquidity coupled with affiliated party liability accruals allow sufficient levels of liquidity to meet the third party obligations of the Fund. The Fund is currently unaware of any trends that would create insufficient liquidity to meet future third party obligations of the Fund.
Liquidity (continued)
As of September 30, 2009, an affiliate of the general partner of the Fund advanced a total of $1,686,457 to the Fund to pay some operating expenses of the Fund, and to make advances and/or loans to Operating Partnerships. These advances are included in Accounts payable-affiliates. During the six months ended September 30, 2009, $48,960 was advanced to the Fund from an affiliate of the general partner. The advances made in the six months ended, as well as the total advances made as of September 30, 2009, are as follows:
Current |
||
Year |
Total |
|
$ - |
$ 108,007 |
|
Series 22 |
5,334 |
42,830 |
Series 23 |
5,414 |
53,150 |
Series 27 |
4,745 |
46,551 |
Series 33 |
5,625 |
40,153 |
Series 34 |
6,071 |
53,299 |
Series 36 |
5,495 |
115,541 |
Series 38 |
- |
69,191 |
Series 39 |
- |
220,455 |
Series 40 |
7,972 |
315,441 |
Series 41 |
8,304 |
348,742 |
Series 42 |
- |
221,615 |
Series 43 |
- |
51,482 |
$48,960 |
$1,686,457 |
All payables to affiliates will be paid, without interest, from available cash flow or the proceeds of sales or refinancing of the Fund's interests in Operating Partnerships.
Capital Resources
The Fund offered BACs in the Public Offering declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16, 1993. The Fund received $38,667,000, $18,927,000, $25,644,000, $33,366,000, $21,697,000, $30,248,000, $39,959,000, $24,607,000, $39,999,000, $39,918,000, $26,490,750, $44,057,750, $47,431,000, $26,362,000, $35,273,000, $33,004,630, $21,068,375, $25,125,000, $25,431,000, $22,921,000, $26,629,250, $28,916,260, $27,442,620, $27,442,620, $36,379,870, $27,019,730, $40,143,670 and $29,809,980 representing 3,866,700, 1,892,700, 2,564,400, 3,336,727, 2,169,878, 3,026,109, 3,995,900, 2,460,700, 4,000,738, 3,991,800, 2,651,000, 4,417,857, 4,754,198, 2,636,533, 3,529,319, 3,300,463, 2,106,837, 2,512,500, 2,543,100, 2,292,152, 2,630,257, 2,891,626, 2,744,262, 3,637,987, 2,701,973, 4,014,367 and 2,908,998 BACs from investors admitted as BAC Holders in Series 20, Series 21, Series 22, Series 23, Series 24, Series 25, Series 26, Series 27, Series 28, Series 29, Series 30, Series 31, Series 32, Series 33, Series 34, Series 35, Series 36, Series 37, Series 38, Series 39, Series 40, Series 41, Series 42, Series 43, Series 44, Series 45 and Series 46, respectively, as of September 30, 2009.
Series 20
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 20 on January 21, 1994. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 20 were completed on June 24, 1994. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 24 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $27,693,970. Series 20 has since sold its interest in two of the Operating Partnerships and 22 remain.
Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 20 had released all payments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships.
Series 21
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 21 on July 5, 1994. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 21 were completed on September 30, 1994. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 14 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $13,872,728. Series 21 has since sold its interest in 2 of the Operating Partnerships and 12 remain.
Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 21 had released all payments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships.
Series 22
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 22 on October 12, 1994. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 22 were completed on December 28, 1994. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 29 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $18,758,748.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 22 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 22 has outstanding contributions payable to 2 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $9,352 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 23
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 23 on January 10, 1995. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 23 were completed on June 23, 1995. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 22 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $24,352,278.
Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 23 had released all payments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships.
Series 24
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 24 on June 9, 1995. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 24 were completed on September 22, 1995. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 24 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $15,796,309. Series 24 has since sold its interest in two of the Operating Partnerships and 22 remain.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 24 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 24 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $9,999 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership has achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.
Series 25
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 25 on September 30, 1995. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 25 were completed on December 29, 1995. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 22 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $22,324,539. Series 25 has since sold its interest in 2 of the Operating Partnerships and 20 remain.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 25 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 25 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $10,001 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership have achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.
Series 26
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 26 on January 18, 1996. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 26 were completed on June 14, 1996. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 45 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $29,401,215. Series 26 has since sold its interest in two of the Operating Partnerships and 43 remain.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 26 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 26 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $14,490, as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 27
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 27 on June 17, 1996. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 27 were completed on September 27, 1996. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 16 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $17,881,574.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 27 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 27 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $39,749 as of September 30, 2009. Of the amount outstanding, $19,341 has been advanced to one of the Operating Partnerships. The advance will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $20,408 will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 28
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 28 on September 30,1996. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 28 were completed on January 31, 1997. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 26 Operating Partnership in the amount of $29,281,983.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 28 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 28 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $40,968 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 29
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 29 on February 10, 1997. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 29 were completed on June 20, 1997. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 22 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $29,137,877. Series 29 has since sold its interest in one of the Operating Partnership and 21 remain.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 29 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 29 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $10,197 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 30
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 30 on June 23, 1997. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 30 were completed on September 10, 1997. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 20 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $19,497,869. Series 30 has since disposed of its interest in two of the Operating Partnerships and 18 remain.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 30 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 30 has outstanding contributions payable to 4 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $127,396 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 31
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 31 on September 11, 1997. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 31 were completed on January 18, 1998. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 27 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $32,569,100. Series 31 has since disposed of its interest in one of the Operating Partnerships and 26 remain.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 31 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 31 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $66,294 as of September 30, 2009. Of the amount outstanding, $25,000 has been funded into an escrow account on behalf of one Operating Partnership. The escrowed funds will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $41,294 will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 32
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 32 on January 19, 1998. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 32 were completed on June 23, 1998. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 17 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $34,129,677. Series 32 has since sold its interest in one of the Operating Partnerships and 16 remain. The series has also purchased membership interests in Bradley Phase I of Massachusetts LLC, Bradley Phase II of Massachusetts LLC, Byam Village of Massachusetts LLC, Hanover Towers of Massachusetts LLC, Harbor Towers of Massachusetts LLC and Maple Hill of Massachusetts LLC. Under the terms of these Assignments of Membership Interests dated December 1, 1998, the series is entitled to various profits, losses, tax credits, cash flow, proceeds from capital transactions and capital accounts as defined in the individual Operating Partnership Agreements. The series utilized $1,092,847 of funds available to invest in Operating Partnerships for this investment.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 32 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 32 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $173,561 as of September 30, 2009. Of the amount outstanding, $46,908 has been advanced or loaned to some of the Operating Partnerships. The loans will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $126,653 will be released when Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 33
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 33 on June 22, 1998. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 33 were completed on September 21, 1998. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 10 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $19,594,100.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 33 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 33 has outstanding contributions payable to 2 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $69,154 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their partnership agreements.
Series 34
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 34 on September 22, 1998. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 34 were completed on February 11, 1999. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 14 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $25,738,978.
Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 34 had released all payments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships.
Series 35
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 35 on February 22, 1999. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 35 were completed on June 28, 1999. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 11 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $24,002,391.
Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 35 had released all payments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships.
Series 36
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 36 on June 22, 1999. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 36 were completed on September 28, 1999. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 11 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $15,277,041.
Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 36 had released all payments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships.
Series 37
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 37 on October 29, 1999. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 37 were completed on January 28, 2000. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 7 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $18,735,142.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 37 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 37 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $138,438 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership has achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.
Series 38
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 38 on February 1, 2000. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 38 were completed on July 31, 2000. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 10 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $18,612,287. In addition, the Fund committed and used $420,296 of Series 38 net offering proceeds to acquire a membership interest in a limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes.
Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 38 had released all payments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships.
Series 39
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 39 on August 1, 2000. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 39 were completed on January 31, 2001. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 9 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $17,115,492 as of September 30, 2009. In addition, the Fund committed and used $192,987 of Series 39 net offering proceeds to acquire a membership interest in a limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes.
Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 39 had released all payments of its capital contributions to the Operating Partnerships.
Series 40
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 40 on February 1, 2001. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 40 were completed on July 31, 2001. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 16 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $19,033,772 as of September 30, 2009. In addition, the Fund committed and used $578,755 of Series 40 net offering proceeds to acquire a membership interest in limited liability companies, which are the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 40 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 40 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $102 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreement.
Series 41
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 41 on August 1, 2001. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 41 were completed on January 31, 2002. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 23 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $21,278,631. In addition, the Fund committed and used $195,249 of Series 41 net offering proceeds to acquire a membership interest in a limited liability company, which is the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. Series 41 has since sold its interest in two of the Operating Partnership and 21 remain.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 41 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 41 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $100 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership has achieved the conditions set forth in its partnership agreement.
Series 42
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 42 on February 1, 2002. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 42 were completed on July 31, 2002. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 23 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $20,661,120. Series 42 has since sold its interest in 1 of the Operating Partnerships and 22 remain.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 42 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 42 has outstanding contributions payable to 4 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $452,937 as of September 30, 2009. Of the amount outstanding, $333,819 has been advanced or loaned to the Operating Partnerships. The loans and advances will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $119,118 will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 43
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 43 on August 1, 2002. Offers and sales of BCAs in Series 43 were completed in December 31, 2002. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 23 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $26,326,543. The Fund also committed and used $805,160 of Series 43 net offering proceeds to acquire membership interests in limited liability companies, which are the general partner of other operating limited partnerships, which own or are constructing, rehabilitating or operating apartment complexes. In addition, the Fund committed and used $268,451 of net offering proceeds to acquire the general partner equity interest in all of the Operating Partnerships in Series 43.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 43 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 43 has outstanding contributions payable to 5 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $307,738 as of September 30, 2009. Of the amount outstanding, $250,302 has been advanced or loaned to the Operating Partnerships. The loans and advances will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $57,436 will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 44
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 44 on January 14, 2003. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 44 were completed in April 30, 2003. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 10 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $20,248,519. In addition, the Fund committed and used $164,164 of Series 44 net offering proceeds to acquire the general partner equity interest in all of the Operating Partnerships in Series 44.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 44 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 44 has outstanding contributions payable to 2 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $590,561 as of September 30, 2009. Of the amount outstanding, $196,604 has been advanced or loaned to the Operating Partnerships. The loans and advances will be converted to capital and the remaining contributions of $393,957 will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Series 45
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 45 on July 1, 2003. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 45 were completed on September 16, 2003. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 31 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $30,232,512. In addition, the Fund committed and used $302,862 of Series 45 net offering proceeds to acquire the general partner equity interest in all of the Operating Partnerships in Series 45. Series 45 has since sold its interest in one of the Operating Partnership and 30 remain.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 45 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 45 has outstanding contributions payable to 1 Operating Partnership in the amount of $16,724 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnership have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreement.
Series 46
The Fund commenced offering BACs in Series 46 on September 23, 2003. Offers and sales of BACs in Series 46 were completed on December 19, 2003. The Fund has committed proceeds to pay initial and additional installments of capital contributions to 15 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $22,495,082. In addition, the Fund committed and used $228,691 of Series 46 net offering proceeds to acquire the general partner equity interest in all of the Operating Partnerships in Series 46.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Series 46 did not record any releases of capital contributions. Series 46 has outstanding contributions payable to 3 Operating Partnerships in the amount of $20,138 as of September 30, 2009. The remaining contributions will be released when the Operating Partnerships have achieved the conditions set forth in their respective partnership agreements.
Results of Operations
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Fund held limited partnership interests in 502 and 510 Operating Partnerships, respectively. In each instance the apartment complex owned by the applicable Operating Partnership is eligible for the federal housing tax credit. Initial occupancy of a unit in each apartment complex which complied with the minimum set-aside test (i.e., initial occupancy by tenants with incomes equal to no more than a certain percentage of area median income) and the rent restriction test (i.e., gross rent charged tenants does not exceed 30% of the applicable income standards) is referred to as "Qualified Occupancy." Each of the Operating Partnerships and each of the respective apartment complexes are described more fully in the Prospectus or applicable report on Form 8-K. The general partner of the Fund believes that there is adequate casualty insurance on the properties.
The Fund incurred a fund management fee to Boston Capital Asset Management Limited Partnership in an amount equal to .5 percent of the aggregate cost of the apartment complexes owned by the Operating Partnerships, less the amount of various asset management and reporting fees paid by the Operating Partnerships. The fund management fees incurred and the reporting fees paid by the Operating Partnerships for the six months ended September 30, 2009, are as follows:
3 Months |
|
6 Months |
|
|
Series 20 |
$ 77,790 |
$ 6,648 |
$ 147,072 |
$ 21,804 |
Series 21 |
30,469 |
4,565 |
11,215 |
62,206 |
Series 22 |
60,836 |
2,812 |
117,372 |
9,924 |
Series 23 |
59,566 |
500 |
106,382 |
13,750 |
Series 24 |
40,883 |
7,267 |
69,322 |
35,762 |
Series 25 |
50,071 |
7,700 |
58,261 |
60,747 |
Series 26 |
90,622 |
12,240 |
141,948 |
69,603 |
Series 27 |
(10,199) |
89,000 |
47,478 |
110,124 |
Series 28 |
74,779 |
8,750 |
113,191 |
53,867 |
Series 29 |
68,589 |
14,262 |
118,240 |
47,462 |
Series 30 |
39,969 |
6,574 |
86,511 |
6,575 |
Series 31 |
89,538 |
1,500 |
168,017 |
14,059 |
Series 32 |
67,276 |
12,000 |
112,702 |
48,283 |
Series 33 |
31,221 |
9,838 |
74,712 |
9,838 |
Series 34 |
73,299 |
- |
146,598 |
- |
Series 35 |
54,590 |
2,500 |
109,221 |
4,959 |
Series 36 |
35,161 |
4,988 |
60,873 |
19,425 |
Series 37 |
43,198 |
8,018 |
91,914 |
10,518 |
Series 38 |
36,900 |
4,200 |
59,469 |
22,731 |
Series 39 |
24,000 |
10,200 |
58,200 |
10,200 |
Series 40 |
49,329 |
675 |
95,008 |
5,000 |
Series 41 |
51,480 |
10,228 |
94,212 |
29,203 |
Series 42 |
50,246 |
12,834 |
109,679 |
16,481 |
Series 43 |
75,820 |
875 |
148,150 |
5,240 |
Series 44 |
56,179 |
14,997 |
126,355 |
15,997 |
Series 45 |
87,604 |
4,037 |
164,083 |
19,199 |
Series 46 |
61,650 |
732 |
124,032 |
732 |
$1,470,866 |
$257,940 |
$2,760,217 |
$723,689 |
The Fund's investment objectives do not include receipt of significant cash distributions from the Operating Partnerships in which it has invested or intends to invest. The Fund's investments in Operating Partnerships have been and will be made principally with a view towards realization of federal housing tax credits for allocation to its partners and BAC holders.
Series 20
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 22 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 20 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(479,037) and $(184,308), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,181,484 and $1,183,812, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
East Douglas Apartments (East Douglas Apartments Limited Partnership) has historically operated at or just below breakeven due to a combination of the low rent structure mandated by the state tax credit monitoring agency, the Illinois Housing Development Authority ("IHDA"), and high debt. The 2008 average occupancy was 82% and the average occupancy for the first three quarters of 2009 was 83%. Occupancy decreased at the end of the second quarter of 2008, due to a number of evictions. Management had trouble re-leasing those vacated units, so the regional manager relaxed some applicant screening criteria, such as work history, which resulted in a number of approved applicants that would have previously been denied. In addition, a new site manager was hired in January 2009. With these changes, occupancy was up to 92% at the end of September 2009.
Due to several months of low occupancy, the property had insufficient cash to turn units and pay payroll and property management fees in early 2009. In May 2009, the investment partnership funded $16,238 to cover some payables associated with unit turn costs, as well as past due management fees and payroll. In the third quarter of 2009, the investment partnership funded an additional $23,553 to cover mold remediation costs (see below) that property operations could not support. To date, the investment partnership has funded $72,178 to the Operating Partnership for operating deficits, of which $39,791 was funded in 2009; $17,112 was funded in 2007; and the remainder was funded in prior years. The property operated slightly below breakeven in 2008 and has continued to operate below breakeven for 2009. The property should be able to breakeven at 94%; however, at the current occupancy level it is not possible to cover the cost of unit turnovers and pay debt service. The Operating Partnership previously established an operating reserve, which had a balance of approximately $78,000 at the end of the second quarter 2009; however, per the loan documents, this reserve functions as a debt service reserve, is controlled by the lender, and is only to be withdrawn from by the lender in the event of default under the loan agreement.
Several years ago, the operating general partner tried to improve the property's financial performance by refinancing the mortgage, but was unsuccessful. Currently, an affiliate of the investment general partner is serving as the operating general partner. The investment general partner had been attempting to find a replacement operating general partner and was in discussions with several interested parties; however, no offers resulted from these conversations. As a result, the investment general partner hired a real estate broker to evaluate the operating general partner interest and help identify additional operating general partner replacements. To date it has been difficult to find an unrelated third party willing to step in as the operating general partner for an underperforming property. The broker suggested that the most likely replacement operating general partner would be a non-profit entity. The investment general partner requested assistance from IHDA, which is also the second lender, in identifying such a non-profit; however, IHDA was unable to provide recommendations or identify specific non-profit developers.
In May 2009, management reported mold growth in the basement of the property after several weeks of heavy rain. The water eventually dissipated, but the excessive moisture in the basement caused rapid mold growth, mostly in the storage areas and stairwell of the basement. Mold growth also spread into the laundry room used by the residents. No resident units were affected. A mold inspection was performed in June 2009 and remediation bids, were received in July 2009. Remediation began in July 2009 and cost approximately $42,000, of which approximately $18,500 was paid out of operating cash. The work was completed in August 2009 and a subsequent inspection revealed that all samples were below acceptable contamination levels. To date, there have been no reports or claims with regard to this mold issue from any residents.
The property taxes and insurance are current; however, in June and July 2009, the Operating Partnership was unable to make the debt service payment. The operating general partner made a request to the lender for a release of funds from the operating reserve, discussed above, to cover future deficits. The lender was not willing to release such funds. With the property unable to cover unit turnover costs, debt service, and the cost of a mold remediation, the property has been unable to make further debt service payments and will likely face foreclosure in the fourth quarter of 2009 or first quarter of 2010. The investment general partner and operating general partners also discussed the possibility of a debt workout plan for this property with the lender; however, without access to the operating reserve, funds would have been required to be released from the investment partnership reserves as part of such workout plan. The investment general partner has determined that the costs associated with maintaining the property through December 31, 2010, the end of the low income housing tax credit compliance period, appear greater than the benefits associated with maintaining tax credit compliance. Any foreclosure sale occurring prior to the December 31, 2010 expiration of the low income housing tax credit compliance period will require the Operating Partnership to recognize tax credit recapture. The amount of tax credit recapture will vary based on the foreclosure sale year. If the foreclosure were to take place in 2009 the Operating Partnership will experience estimated recapture and interest of $558,817, equivalent to $142 per 1,000 BACs. If the foreclosure were to take place in 2010 the Operating Partnership will experience estimated recapture and interest of $292,999, equivalent to $74 per 1,000 BACs. The lender assigned a receiver to the property on October 1, 2009. The receiver is now managing the property and all Operating Partnership accounts.
2730 Lafferty Street Apartments L.P. (Gardenview Apartments) is a 309-unit property located approximately twenty miles outside Houston, Texas. The property suffered a fire in the second quarter of 2006, causing twenty units to come off-line. The property was issued 8823s for the units taken off-line. Additionally, 8823s were issued to the property as a result of a State inspection completed prior to the fire. Management sent corrective documents to the Texas Department of Housing and corrected 8823s were received in the third quarter of 2008. Although 2008 average occupancy improved through the first two quarters, it decreased during the second half of the year to 78% as a result of vacancies caused by water damage from Hurricane Ike. In total, 64 units were affected, of which 46 were off-line. All units were back on line in the first quarter of 2009. All liability issues were addressed and corrected immediately following the storm. The estimated cost for repairs is $2,300,000, with insurance proceeds covering all expenses. Marketing efforts have been focused on local medical offices as well as the City of Pasadena and Harris County Housing Authorities. In addition, a move-in concession of $99 and a resident referral program with a $300 discount are in place. This has helped occupancy increase to 86% as of September 2009. The tax credit delivery period ended in 2005 and the low-income housing tax credit compliance period expires in December 2009. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance payments are current.
Northfield Apartments, LP (Willow Point I Apartments) is a 120-unit property located in Jackson, Mississippi. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property continues to operate below breakeven due to low occupancy and high operating expenses. Occupancy has dropped in 2009 and ended the third quarter at 70% occupied. The operating general partner has stated that the drop in occupancy is due to new competition in the area, the depressed local economy and turnover in management. To help increase occupancy, management has increased marketing to local businesses. They are leaving fliers with property information, rental rates and specials. Management continues to lower rents and offer concessions of up to one month free rent to help increase occupancy. Management also implemented a resident referral program at the beginning of the third quarter. A new property manager was hired in June 2009. She has extensive management experience and the operating general partner is very confident that she will be able to improve occupancy. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the new property manager's progress and commissioned a third party to assess the new manager's leasing skills. The management company has also advised that they are in the process of hiring a second regional property manager for the Jackson, MS market. They feel that the Jackson market is a difficult market and having a second regional property manager will provide the proper oversight and attention to help improve occupancy and overall operations. High maintenance, utility and bad debt expenses have also contributed to the decline in operations. The accounts payable balance remains high. Maintenance expenses are high due to the increased turnover at the property and the need to make vacant units rent ready. To retain residents and decrease turnover, management is offering incentives to current residents such as carpet cleanings, touch up painting and a renewal concession equal to one-half month's rent. Utility expenses are high due to exorbitant water rates in the City of Jackson. Management continues to contact the City about potentially lowering rates, but has been unsuccessful. The investment general partner will continue to work with management to strengthen their collection procedures and has asked management and the operating general partner to track their screening criteria to ensure they are renting to residents with strong rental history. The investment general partner addressed the high accounts payable issue with the operating general partner in the third quarter. The operating general partner did advance some funds to the Operating Partnership in the third quarter, but payables continue to grow. The investment general partner will continue to follow up with management to ensure aged payables do not impact operations. The investment general partner performed a management review and site inspection in October of 2009. The property manager appears qualified for the position and the physical condition of the property was good. All taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current. On December 31, 2009, the 15-year low income housing tax credit compliance period will expire with respect to Northfield Apartments LP.
In December 2006, the investment general partner of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund II - Series 14, Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund III - Series 17 and Series 20 transferred 33% of their interest in College Greene Rental Associates Limited Partnership to entities affiliated with the operating general partners for their assumption of one third of the outstanding mortgage balance. The cash proceeds received by Series 14, Series 17, and Series 20 were $25,740, $7,919, and $65,341, respectively. Of the proceeds received, $1,950, $599, and $4,951 for Series 14, Series 17, and Series 20, respectively, was paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds received by Series 14, Series 17, and Series 20 of $23,790, $7,320 and $60,390, respectively, were applied against the investment limited partners' investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting. The remaining 67% investment limited partner interest is anticipated to be transferred as follows: 50% in January 2010 for $150,000 and 17% in February 2011 for $51,000. The future proceeds will be allocated to the investment limited partnerships based on their original equity investments in the Operating Partnership.
Series 21
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 12 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 21 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(147,421) and $(233,275), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $408,867 and $445,098, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Pumphouse Crossing II, LP (Pumphouse Crossing II Apartments) is a 48-unit family property located in Chippewa, Wisconsin. The property operated with an average occupancy of 96% in 2008 with operations below breakeven status. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy remains strong at 94%, and expenses remain below the State averages, but the property continues to operate below breakeven. Although occupancy is high and expenses remain reasonable, low rental rates in the area continue to prevent the property from achieving breakeven operations. The management company continues to market the available units by working closely with the Housing Authority, and by continuing various marketing efforts to attract qualified residents. The operating general partner continues to financially support the Operating Partnership. The mortgage, taxes, insurance and payables are current.
Black River Run, LP (River Run Apartments) is a 48-unit, family property located in Black River Falls, Wisconsin. In 2008, the property operated with an average occupancy of 97% with below breakeven operations. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy has declined slightly averaging 92%, and operations remain below breakeven. Although occupancy is strong and expenses remain below the State averages, low rental rates in the area continue to prevent the property from achieving breakeven operations. The management agent continues to market the available units by working closely with the Housing Authority and is continuing various marketing efforts to attract qualified residents. The operating general partner continues to financially support the Operating Partnership. The mortgage, taxes, insurance and accounts payables are all current.
Lookout Ridge LP (Lookout Ridge Apts.) is a 30-unit development located in Covington, KY. The property continues to operate below breakeven due to high operating expenses and low occupancy. On August 20, 2007, the investment general partner received a fax, via management, from the Internal Revenue Service stating that due to continued non-compliance at Lookout Ridge Apartments, credits could not be calculated for the year, and that the previous credits claimed are subject to recapture. The specific non-compliance issues cited by the Internal Revenue Service are: management failed to correctly complete or document tenants' annual income certification; violation(s) of local inspection standards; the project failed to meet minimum set-aside requirements; violation(s) of the Vacant Unit Rule under Reg. 1.42-5(c)(1)(ix); and the project is no longer in compliance with nor participating in the Section 42 Program.
Although the operating general partner has advanced significant funds to keep accounts current, the operational outlook for this property is not favorable. Occupancy numbers are running at historic lows and expenses continue to climb. Both the operating general partner and management have proven their inability to effectively run this property by not following Section 42 guidelines. Furthermore, Kentucky Housing has provided management with a number of opportunities to correct various non-compliance issues which management failed to act upon. Other non-compliance issues are costly capital expense items which include: replacement of concrete pads, replacement of entry stairs, replacement of landscaping ties, correction of drainage issues, and deck repairs.
The operating general partner requested use of operating reserve funds in order to pay for 2008 taxes; as such, the operating reserve balance is now zero per the 2008 audit. In total, the operating general partner has funded operating deficits of $324,422. The operating general partner continues to advance funds as needed. In 2008, occupancy averaged 77%, and the property operated below breakeven for the year. Through the third quarter of 2009, average occupancy is 76%, and the property continues to operate below breakeven. The investment general partner was recently informed that the manager of the property is no longer working with the management company.
In summary, the property has a history of unstable financial performance and inefficient management. These problems are compounded by continued non-compliance, significant costs necessary to correct capital improvement items, a building fire destroying all tenant files and an IRS letter indicating removal from the Section 42 program. Due to the removal from the Section 42 program, the Operating Partnership experienced recapture, interest and penalties of $858,975. This represents recapture, interest and penalties of $445 per 1,000 BACs, which was reflected on the 2007 tax return. The operating general partner has worked with their attorney and Kentucky Housing in an attempt to get the property back into the Section 42 program, but upon review, Kentucky Housing denied reinstatement back into the Section 42 tax credit program. At this time, the investment general partner and its legal counsel are discussing a plan of action for this Operating Partnership.
In December 2008, the investment general partner performed a site visit at the property. The property is in extremely poor physical condition. In addition, the tenant files were incomplete and the management office disorderly. Overall, the condition of the property, files and units are in desperate need of assistance. Since the property is no longer part of the Section 42 program, the investment general partner is in the process of exploring various disposition opportunities consistent with the investment objectives of the investment partnership.
Pinedale II, LP (Pinedale Apartments II) is a 60-unit, family property located in Menomonie, Wisconsin. The property maintained an average occupancy of 96% in 2008 with below breakeven operations. Occupancy remains consistent with the prior year average through the third quarter of 2009. The property's operating expenses are below the State averages. Despite occupancy above 90%, low rental rates in the area continue to prevent the property from achieving breakeven status. The management agent continues to market the available units by working closely with the Housing Authority and is continuing various marketing efforts to attract qualified residents. The operating general partner continues to financially support the Operating Partnership. The mortgage, taxes, insurance and accounts payable are all current.
Campton Housing Associates Limited Partnership (The Woods Apartments) is a 20-unit development located in Campton, NH. Despite strong occupancy, the property operated below breakeven in 2008 due to several unanticipated costs, which significantly increased operating expenses from the prior year. Utilities increased from the prior year because the fuel company did not bill the property for a portion of the 2007 consumption until 2008. In 2008, the property was charged with $6,351 in fuel, which was actually consumed in 2007. In addition, fuel rates went up. Maintenance expenses increased due to higher than expected snow removal costs. As a result of the amount of snow in 2008, the property required an additional $5,500 in snow removal expense to remove accumulated snow from the roof. Management was advised that if the snow was not removed, it could have caused significant damage to the roof. Management has budgeted for extra snow removal costs in 2009. The property received a 10% rent increase, which went into effect January 1, 2009. Occupancy averaged 99% in 2008 and continues to be strong averaging 100% through the third quarter of 2009. Despite strong occupancy, the property operated below breakeven in the first and second quarters due to high snow removal costs and high audit costs. Operating expenses have stabilized in the third quarter and the property is operating above breakeven year-to-date. Management expects the property to continue to operate above breakeven in upcoming quarters and does not foresee any operational issues. All tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are current.
Centrum-Fairfax I, LP (Forest Glen at Sully Station, Phase I) is a 119-unit property located in Centerville, VA. The average physical occupancy for 2006 was 61%. Based on the results of a market study performed in 2006, the operating general partner decided to reconfigure the property to have only 83 units, which reduced the number of 1-bedroom units from 100 to 29 and increased the number of 2-bedroom units from 19 to 55. The conversion of the units started in early June 2006 and it was originally anticipated to be complete by mid-October 2006. However, the construction of the property was delayed due to issues with subcontractors. The construction was completed in March 2007 and all units have received Certificates of Occupancy. The funding to complete the work came from the Virginia Housing Authority in the amount of $580,000. The mortgage, taxes, insurance and payables are current. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits. It took ten months to lease the property. As of December 31, 2007, the property was 98% occupied and all the converted units were 100% qualified and physically occupied. However, the property was still unable to breakeven due to the slow leasing and the high marketing expenses during the lease up. Through the fourth quarter 2008, this property operated above breakeven with strong average physical occupancy of 95%. However, in the third quarter 2009 physical occupancy began to drop and as of September 2009 the property was 82% physically occupied. As a result this property was unable to operate above breakeven. The drop in the occupancy was due to the fact that two bedrooms are less desirable in this senior community due to the affordability factor. In the third quarter, the only vacant units were two bedroom units. The rental rates of the two-bedroom apartment units are about $200 higher then those on the one-bedroom units. Most senior residents prefer to live in one-bedroom units due to affordability. To attract new residents, management is offering move-in specials for two-bedroom units, such as one-month free rent for two bedrooms only. Management is also considering dropping two-bedroom rental rates from $1200 to $1100.
In May 2009, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Centrum - Frederick LP to a non-affiliated entity for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $5,372,664 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $466,654. Of the total proceeds received, $88,576 represents a reimbursement of funds previously advanced to the Operating Partnership, and $55,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership. Of the remaining proceeds, $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $308,078 will be returned to cash reserves. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to $97,878. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amount of $210,200 as of June 30, 2009. In August 2009, the investment partnership received its share of the operating partnership's cash and reserves in the amount of $410,000 which was recorded as a gain on sale and returned to the cash reserves as of September 30, 2009.
Series 22
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 29 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 22 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(560,563) and $(586,422), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $884,412 and $916,786, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Elks Tower Apartments, LP (Elks Tower Apartments) is a 27-unit development located in Litchfield, IL. Occupancy in 2008 averaged 90% and the property operated below breakeven. The operating general partner continues to focus on marketing, as there is considerable tax credit competition in the area. A 50-unit affordable housing complex is under construction nearby, but has been delayed due to financing difficulties. The property is sponsored by Illinois Development Housing Authority,
and will have units set aside for rent to tenants at 30% and 50% of the area median income. Elks Tower rents to tenants at or below 60% of the area median income. The operating general partner believes the new development may have a significant impact on their ability to lease units, so they have concentrated on tenant retention. In order to improve the curb appeal, the operating general partner plans to replace the carpets, roof and repaint, as funds are available. Occupancy averaged 89% through the third quarter of 2009, and the property continues to operate below breakeven due to low rent levels and high operating expenses. The mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are current.Black River Run, LP (River Run Apartments) is a 48-unit, family property located in Black River Falls, Wisconsin. In 2008, the property operated with an average occupancy of 97% with below breakeven operations. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy has declined slightly averaging 92%, and operations remain below breakeven. Although occupancy is strong and expenses remain below the State averages, low rental rates in the area continue to prevent the property from achieving breakeven operations. The management agent continues to market the available units by working closely with the Housing Authority and is continuing various marketing efforts to attract qualified residents. The operating general partner continues to financially support the Operating Partnership. The mortgage, taxes, insurance and accounts payables are current.
Roxbury Veterans Housing, LP (Highland House) is a 14-unit property located in Roxbury, Massachusetts. In the second quarter of 2007 the Department of Housing and Community Development informed the investment general partner that the Department of Mental Health would be terminating its contract with Roxbury Veterans Housing due to sub-par property conditions. Upon notification, the investment general partner inspected the property and found areas of concern regarding the overall condition of the property. The investment general partner also learned that the operating general partner terminated the management contract of the third-party agent late in 2006, with the intention of self-managing. In May 2007, the investment general partner was informed of a default notice sent to the operating general partner by One United Bank, the holder of the first mortgage note. The investment general partner learned that there was a mortgagee sale of the property scheduled for June 14, 2007 and that this sale date had been extended from May 2007.
Subsequently, the investment general partner contacted all critical stakeholders including the City of Boston Department of Neighborhood Development (DND), the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), the operating general partner and their respective attorneys to come to a workout plan with the lender. After much negotiation and the threat of a bankruptcy filing that would reinstate the loan on its original terms, the lender agreed to a forbearance agreement. This agreement, signed June 13, 2007, allowed a 60-day window during which the operating general partner interest was to be sold and the PAR value of the note ($355,000) held by One United was to be paid in full. The new operating general partner was agreed to by all of the parties, and on September 14, 2007 the One United note was paid in full. The new operating general partner holds the first soft mortgage and began planning property upgrades to be funded by DND and DHCD. The property was expected to be re-occupied prior to year-end 2007; however, the work was delayed due to the funding agencies' frequent requests for additional information and the prolonged process of releasing funds.
All units remained vacant through the fourth quarter of 2008. The property began making units available in 2009 and was 86% occupied as of the end of the second quarter of the year. Occupancy has continued to increase monthly and reportedly reached 96% in September 2009. Throughout negotiations regarding the foreclosing lender, the operating general partner transfer, and additional funding, the credit allocating agency repeatedly assured that credits would not be in jeopardy. Since that time, there have been senior staff changes at the credit agency that prompted the investment general partner to seek reconfirmation of the credit situation. Over the past two quarters, the investment general partner has made repeated attempts to contact the agency, with no response. The tax credit delivery period ended in 2007 and the low-income housing tax credit compliance period expires in 2011.
Kimbark 1200 Associates, LP (Kimbark 1200 Apartments) is a 48-unit family development located in Longmont, CO. The property suffers from low occupancy due to a weak local economy. In addition, the property has mostly three-bedroom units (42 of the 48) and these units have comparable rents to single-family rental homes, which are more desirable. The poor quality of the school system also makes it difficult to attract families with children. The site manager developed a good relationship with the local police who have initiated night-time patrols. To attract applicants, management continues to offer rental concessions and resident referral fees. Banners and signs have been redesigned for increased visibility; a rotating model unit is shown to applicants; and advertising on the Internet, and in adjacent towns, has increased. A site visit was completed in August 2008, and found the property in excellent condition. Although the 2008 annual occupancy averaged 94%, there was a slow decline throughout the second half of the year, ending at 85% occupancy in December 2008. The decline was due to layoffs in companies in Longmont and surrounding areas. The first three quarters of 2009 showed a slight improvement averaging 89% occupancy. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits. Accounts payable, mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current. The last year for credit delivery was 2005 and the low income housing tax credit compliance period expires in 2010.
Edmond Properties, LP (Chapel Ridge of Edmond) is a 160-unit property located in Edmond, OK. The property operated with an average occupancy of 85% for 2007 and 83% in 2008. Despite the low occupancy, the Operating Partnership operated above breakeven in 2007 and 2008, due to management's ability to control operating expenses. At the end of 2007, due to continued occupancy issues, the operating general partner replaced the management company. At that time, the entire site staff left and new management was not able to replace the site staff until June 2008. During the 2008 site visit it was determined that management was not making units ready for occupancy in a timely manner and was cannibalizing vacant units in order to make other units rent-ready. The reason for the number of non-rent ready units was due mainly to staffing issues, as there was only one maintenance person on staff to manage 160 units. Many of the tenants who had been approved by the prior management company were problematic and upon eviction and/or move-out left the units with significant damages. In September 2008, management hired an assistant maintenance technician. Since that time, all units have been turned and brought back on-line. Occupancy averaged 89% through the third quarter of 2009, ending at 84% in September with above breakeven operations. Contractors had been hired to turn vacant units as management worked to fill three vacant maintenance positions. All three maintenance positions were filled at the end of August 2009 and the property is fully staffed. Management also improved applicant approval criteria so as to lease to more reliable tenants, and as a result, evictions are down at the property. Since June 2008, turnover costs have declined significantly and collections have improved due to becoming a primary focus of the staff. New marketing efforts have been effective. The operating general partner is planning on upgrading the amenities at the site as well as completing exterior improvements to enhance the marketability of the property. Currently all roofs are being replaced due to storm damage. The investment general partner will continue to monitor and assist management with marketing and leasing strategies and conduct the annual site visit to ensure that any deferred maintenance is being addressed in a timely manner. All real estate tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Bayou Crossing, LP (Bayou Crossing Apartments) is a 289-unit property located in Riverview, FL. The property began experiencing a decline in operations in 2007 due to a combination of a decrease in occupancy and a $40,000 increase in insurance expenses. The decline in occupancy was due to a number of job losses in the area as turnover increased and occupancy dipped to 85% by year-end 2007. In addition, bad debt and evictions increased. In 2008, the investment general partner performed a site inspection and noted a number of maintenance concerns including erosion issues due to poor drainage and units not being made ready for occupancy. Since that time, all units have been brought back on-line, drainage and erosion issues are being addressed and occupancy improved from 79% in March 2008 to 85% at year end 2008. Bayou Crossing continued to operate below breakeven in 2008 due to concessions, bad debt and vacancy all increasing significantly from historical operations. The increase in vacancy and bad debt is a direct reflection of Florida's economy as ongoing job losses have led to increased evictions and migration from the area. In response, management increased its marketing and outreach efforts and made improvements to the property's frontage to make the community more marketable. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy has averaged 89% with below breakeven operations due to high economic vacancy. Management continues to focus marketing efforts on on-line sources, Section 8, Tampa Housing Authority and the Hillsboro County Agencies. A site visit was conducted during the first quarter of 2009. The property was in good condition with no significant deferred maintenance. Units were being turned efficiently and the management staff was knowledgeable and effective. The investment general partner will continue to work with management to reduce economic vacancy and control expenses. All real estate tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Richmond Hardin (Richmond Square Apartments) is a 32-unit family property located in Richmond, Missouri. Occupancy began to decline in July 2008 reaching 78%, from a previous six-month average of 86%. By year-end 2008, occupancy declined to 71%, with operations below breakeven status. Occupancy began to improve throughout the first half of 2009, reaching an average of 81%. However, the majority of the tenant base is composed of retail employees with diminishing work per week; and occupancy declined in the third quarter to an average of 75%. The property is not in a highly populated area, limiting the applicant pool. The site manager continues to increase advertising and outreach. Additionally, resident referrals and rental concession programs continue to be offered. Property taxes and insurance are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires at year-end 2009.
Lost Tree Limited Partnership (Lost Tree Apartments) is an 88-unit family property located in Branson, Missouri. Occupancy began to decline in April of 2009 reaching 80%, from a previous six-month average of 90%. Occupancy began to improve in September of 2009 reaching 95%. However, the majority of the tenant base is composed of employees in the tourism industry, with diminishing work in the first quarter of each year due to seasonal tourism. Historically, occupancy drops during this time. The applicant pool is also limited due to low-income limits in the County. Due to increased turnover, maintenance expenses have also increased. Management and the owners continue to increase advertising and outreach. Additionally, new and improved quality of site staff has been hired to improve tenant relations and tenant retention. The operating general partner depleted replacement reserve funds from $69,000 to $28,000 in the second quarter to pay deferred maintenance expense and developer fees. Property taxes and insurance are current. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires at year-end 2009.
Series 23
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 22 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 23 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(458,415) and $(483,175), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $772,842 and $839,662, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Colonna Redevelopment Company (Colonna House) is a 36-unit development located in Hempstead, NY. Despite achieving above breakeven operations in 2008 and maintaining average occupancy of 99% through the third quarter of 2009, replacement reserves have not been fully funded and the accounts payable balance is excessive. The balance sheet indicates that over $360,000 is due from an operating general partner and affiliates for unapproved loans from the Operating Partnership, including an additional $58,500 to the operating general partner's operating company in 2008. The investment general partner visited the operating general partner at his corporate office to discuss these issues. The operating general partner stated that he would need to conduct additional research to understand how these sources were deployed. Asset management fees are guaranteed and remain outstanding. In 2008, the operating general partner brought up the idea of refinancing the debt on the property. The investment general partner replied via certified letter stating that any refinancing or additional debt on the property must be pre-approved by the investment general partner. The 2009 financial statements and occupancy reports were not provided in a timely manner, and were not received until the fourth quarter of 2009. The reports indicate high occupancy and above breakeven operations. All taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current. The Operating Partnership's low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2009. The investment general partner and the operating general partner have started discussions regarding disposition options upon the end of compliance period. The operating general partner stated that an appraisal of the property has been ordered.
South Hills Apartments (South Hills Apartments, LP) is a 72-unit, family property located in Bellevue, Nebraska. In 2008, the property operated below breakeven due to the combination of low occupancy, low rental rates and overly burdensome debt service, due to the high interest rate of 10.4%. The average occupancy was 84%. Due to a number of job losses in the area, occupancy decreased and the property operated with an average occupancy of 81% through the third quarter of 2009. There are few qualified prospective residents that can afford the tax credit rents without obtaining rental assistance, which is currently limited. The property is also competing with newer properties, which offer superior amenity packages. Management has been focusing on marketing to area employers, strengthening the resident base, increasing resident retention, and improving collections. Management has also increased concessions and resident referral rewards. Despite these steps, the property has been unable to operate above breakeven in 2009.
Historically, the operating general partner has continued to fund operating deficits in accordance with its operating deficit guarantee, which is unlimited in time and amount. However, the operating general partner has indicated that it cannot continue to support the operations due to financial problems. As a result, the Operating Partnership missed the April and June mortgage payments. In July of 2009, the lender served the Operating Partnership with a Notice of Default and Election to Sell. In addition, the mortgage is in technical default, as it fell below the required minimum combined escrow (real estate taxes, insurance, and replacement reserves) balance of $50,000. The lender demanded a payment of $70,000 to be made by August 3, 2009, to cure the default; however, the operating general partner failed to provide such funds. The lender commenced foreclosure actions on August 4, 2009, with a foreclosure sale that was scheduled for October 20, 2009. The investment general partner has determined that the costs associated with maintaining the property through December 31, 2010, the end of the low income housing tax credit compliance period, appear to be greater than the benefit associated with maintaining tax credit compliance.
In September, a buyer was identified who was willing to purchase the investment and general partner interests for a nominal amount and keep the property affordable through the remainder of the compliance period, if the lender would agree to withdraw the foreclosure filing. However, the lender rejected this proposal and, in October, accepted a bid from another buyer to purchase from the lender the outstanding debt on the property. At this time, there is no indication from the buyer as to its intentions for the property. While the transaction will not necessarily cancel the foreclosure sale, it has delayed the sale that was scheduled for October 20, 2009. If a foreclosure sale were to occur prior to the expiration of the compliance period the Operating Partnership will be required to recognize tax credit recapture. The amount of tax credit recapture will vary based on the foreclosure sale year. If the foreclosure were to take place in 2009 the Operating Partnership will experience estimated recapture and interest of $687,973, equivalent to $202 per 1,000 BACs. If the foreclosure were to take place in 2010 the Operating Partnership will experience estimated recapture and interest of $360,713, equivalent to $106 per 1,000 BACs.
Kimbark 1200 Associates, LP (Kimbark 1200 Apartments) is a 48-unit family development located in Longmont, CO. The property suffers from low occupancy due to a weak local economy. In addition, the property has mostly three-bedroom units (42 of the 48) and these units have comparable rents to single-family rental homes, which are more desirable. The poor quality of the school system also makes it difficult to attract families with children. The site manager developed a good relationship with the local police who have initiated nighttime patrols. To attract applicants, management continues to offer rental concessions and resident referral fees. Banners and signs have been redesigned for increased visibility; a rotating model unit is shown to applicants; and advertising on the Internet, and in adjacent towns, has increased. A site visit was completed in August 2008, and found the property in excellent condition. Although the 2008 annual occupancy averaged 94%, there was a slow decline throughout the second half of the year, ending at 85% occupancy in December 2008. The decline was due to layoffs in companies in Longmont and surrounding areas. The first three quarters of 2009 showed a slight improvement averaging 89% occupancy. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits. Accounts payable, mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current. The last year for credit delivery was 2005 and the low income housing tax credit compliance period expires in 2010.
Edmond Properties, LP (Chapel Ridge of Edmond) is a 160-unit property located in Edmond, OK. The property operated with an average occupancy of 85% for 2007 and 83% in 2008. Despite the low occupancy, the Operating Partnership operated above breakeven in 2007 and 2008, due to management's ability to control operating expenses. At the end of 2007, due to continued occupancy issues, the operating general partner replaced the management company. At that time, the entire site staff left and new management was not able to replace the site staff until June 2008. During the 2008 site visit it was determined that management was not making units ready for occupancy in a timely manner and was cannibalizing vacant units in order to make other units rent-ready. The reason for the number of non-rent ready units was due mainly to staffing issues, as there was only one maintenance person on staff to manage 160 units. Many of the tenants who had been approved by the prior management company were problematic and upon eviction and/or move-out left the units with significant damages. In September 2008, management hired an assistant maintenance technician. Since that time, all units have been turned and brought back on-line. Occupancy averaged 89% through the third quarter of 2009, ending at 84% in September with above breakeven operations. Contractors had been hired to turn vacant units as management worked to fill three vacant maintenance positions. All three maintenance positions were filled at the end of August 2009 and the property is fully staffed. Management also improved applicant approval criteria so as to lease to more reliable tenants, and as a result, evictions are down at the property. Since June 2008, turnover costs have declined significantly and collections have improved due to becoming a primary focus of the staff. New marketing efforts have been effective. The operating general partner is planning on upgrading the amenities at the site as well as completing exterior improvements to enhance the marketability of the property. Currently all roofs are being replaced due to storm damage. The investment general partner will continue to monitor and assist management with marketing and leasing strategies and conduct the annual site visit to ensure that any deferred maintenance is being addressed in a timely manner. All real estate tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Bayou Crossing, LP (Bayou Crossing Apartments) is a 289-unit property located in Riverview, FL. The property began experiencing a decline in operations in 2007 due to a combination of a decrease in occupancy and a $40,000 increase in insurance expenses. The decline in occupancy was due to a number of job losses in the area as turnover increased and occupancy dipped to 85% by year-end 2007. In addition, bad debt and evictions increased. In 2008, the investment general partner performed a site inspection and noted a number of maintenance concerns including erosion issues due to poor drainage and units not being made ready for occupancy. Since that time, all units have been brought back on-line, drainage and erosion issues are being addressed and occupancy improved from 79% in March 2008 to 85% at year end 2008. Bayou Crossing continued to operate below breakeven in 2008 due to concessions, bad debt and vacancy all increasing significantly from historical operations. The increase in vacancy and bad debt is a direct reflection of Florida's economy as ongoing job losses have led to increased evictions and migration from the area. In response, management increased its marketing and outreach efforts and made improvements to the property's frontage to make the community more marketable. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy averaged 89% with below breakeven operations due to high economic vacancy. Management continues to focus marketing efforts on on-line sources, Section 8, Tampa Housing Authority and the Hillsboro County Agencies. A site visit was conducted during the first quarter of 2009. The property was in good condition with no significant deferred maintenance. Units were being turned efficiently and the management staff was knowledgeable and effective. The investment general partner will continue to work with management to reduce economic vacancy and control expenses. All real estate tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Series 24
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 22 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 24 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(544,563) and $(497,549), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $820,656 and $781,014, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Elm Street Associates, Limited Partnership (Elm Street Apartments) is located in Yonkers, New York. The neighborhood has been a difficult one in which to operate due to high crime. Almost all tenants have some public subsidy, making this a very management-intensive property. Poor tenancy has historically resulted in operating deficits. Although management has been proactive in addressing these concerns, other management issues, including poor rent collections and deferred maintenance, have negatively impacted the property. Occupancy averaged 84% in 2008, and continues to struggle in 2009 with occupancy averaging 79% through September 2009. Management is trying to be proactive in trying to keep residents in the units by supplying life skills to families who are having trouble paying rent. After referring families to rent assistance services, they offer counseling for basic budgeting skills to avoid future evictions. Operating expenses through the second quarter of 2009 have shown some stabilization, and are currently running below budget. Despite the decreased expenses the property continues to operate below breakeven due to the decreased occupancy and bad debt. The mortgage, real estate tax, insurance and required replacement reserve deposits are all current. The Operating Partnership is dependent on the operating general partner funding the operating deficits by cash infusions, and deferring management fees. The goal of management is to work on improving and stabilizing the neighborhood in order to attract and retain residents. The operating general partner has a longstanding and ongoing commitment to the residents of Southwest Yonkers where their housing programs and service offices are located.
The operating general partner's most intensive community development work is focused in Nodine Hill where the property is located. They have been instrumental in operating the Elm Street Neighborhood Center, which offers neighborhood residents access to after school children's programs, job training for adults and teens, and work services programs for adults. The operating general partner has been proactive and successful in obtaining grants such as a recent award under the New York State Main Street program which was designed to stimulate downtown revitalization. Funds have been utilized for building renovations, streetscape enhancements, and commercial and affordable housing development. Recently there have been some positive signs of development in the community, including a family medical practice, a deli, and a fish market. The tot lot has opened on the property and is a bright addition to the neighborhood. A site visit conducted in the fourth quarter of 2008 showed the property looked good, and was well maintained. The operating general partner remains committed to the property and the neighborhood and expressed a willingness to continue funding deficits until the property stabilizes. The operating general partner has a significant investment in the community in which the property is located, and all attempts to stabilize the property are geared for the long term. In the short term, the operating general partner is working to increase occupancy levels, as well as working to educate the tenants so they do not fall behind in rent payments. A site visit is planned for the fourth quarter of 2009. The investment general partner will continue to monitor this Operating Partnership until property operations have stabilized.
Jeremy Associates, LP (Coopers Crossing Apartments) is a 93-unit family development located in Las Colinas, Texas. Average occupancy for 2007 was 90%, down 6% from the 2006 average occupancy. In 2008, average occupancy was 94%; however, the property continued to operate below breakeven due to high operating expenses and debt service. Operating expenses are high due mainly to inordinately high maintenance costs, as a result of severe physical deficiencies in a number of buildings on site. Since construction, a number of the buildings have had incidents of differential settlement resulting in cracked floor slabs, cracked brick veneer, cracked windows and doors and sagging balconies. These concerns have been addressed on an ongoing basis via advances by the operating general partner. Thus far the operating general partner has advanced over $1,600,000 for repairs and operating deficits. Occupancy levels are consistently above 90% at Coopers Crossing. However, despite high occupancy and cost control efforts, including staffing reduction, reduced marketing and the shutting down of one boiler during warmer months, the property continues to operate below breakeven. Through the third quarter of 2009, average occupancy is 95%, and the property continues to operate below breakeven. Debt service is high as the interest rate is 8.77%. The operating general partner has stated that refinance is not an option due to a prohibitively expensive yield maintenance penalty; however, he has stated that they have entered preliminary discussions with regards to reducing their monthly debt service via an alternative arrangement with the lender so as to allow the property increased cash flow. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits despite the expiration of the operating deficit guarantee. The investment general partner will continue to work with management to improve occupancy and reduce expenses. In addition, a representative of the investment general partner conducted a site visit during the third quarter of 2009 to evaluate the condition of the property. The operating general partner continues to address settlement concerns by slab jacking to stabilize movement. All buildings were on-line and deferred maintenance does not appear to be an issue. The operating general partner is actively repairing drywall cracks, adjusting sticking doors and repainting affected units. Settlement remains an ongoing issue at the property. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes and insurance are current.
Zwolle Partnership (Lakeway Apartments) is a 32-unit multifamily development located in Zwolle, Louisiana. During 2007, a rental increase was implemented effective for new move-ins or upon lease renewal. The rent increase caused a considerable amount of vacancies, as tenants could not afford the new rates. Although the Operating Partnership operated above breakeven during 2007, occupancy declined 11% to average 88% for the year. Although much of the occupancy decline was due to the rent increase, it was also attributed to the continued weakening of the local economy. Lakeway Apartments is approximately twelve miles away from the nearest town, Many, Louisiana. In Many, most of the apartment complexes offer rental assistance or substantial leasing concessions. This is causing residents to vacate the Zwolle area. Both Many and Zwolle are towns that continue to struggle to keep residents in the area because several businesses have closed and there are not many employment opportunities. This is evidenced at Lakeway as there are twenty-two rental assistance slots, but only two Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) voucher tenants at the site. Although the operating general partner has a good rapport with the HUD representative in the Parish, there are no new HUD vouchers to be provided. In addition, turnover of the on-site manager position has continued to hinder the circumstances on-site. Occupancy averaged 82% in 2008. Despite the relatively low occupancy, the Operating Partnership operated above breakeven in 2008. In an effort to attract qualified traffic, the manager is blanketing the immediate area with flyers and working with local non-profit agencies, churches, and area employers. As a result of these efforts, occupancy improved to average 84% through the third quarter of 2009. The operating general partner is funding all deficits as necessary. The guarantee is unlimited in time and amount. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
New Hilltop Apartments, Phase II (Hilltop Apartments) is a 72-unit property located in Laurens, SC. Industrial decline in the area has led to a dwindling population base from which to draw qualified residents. Only 21 of the property's 72 units have rental assistance. Consequently, the property has trouble competing with properties that offer more units with rental assistance. In 2008, occupancy averaged 85%, and the property operated below breakeven for the year. Through the third quarter of 2009, average occupancy was 72%, and the property continues to operate below breakeven. The primary reasons that the property continues to operate below breakeven include: insufficient rental rates, vacancy loss, various capital improvement projects and additional replacement reserve funding per a Rural Development workout plan. Management continues to market the property through local media and civic organizations, as well as investigating the possibility of obtaining additional project-based rental assistance subsidy. The mortgage, real estate tax, insurance and payables to non-related entities are current. The operating general partner's guarantee is unlimited in time and amount. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires on December 31, 2009.
Century East IV, LP (Century East IV Apartments) is a 24-unit development located in Bismarck, ND. In 2006, the property operated with a cash deficit due to maintaining an average occupancy of 88%. In 2007, average occupancy improved to 93%, and the property began operating above breakeven. In 2008, average occupancy increased to 94%, but the property operated slightly below breakeven. Due to performance concerns, the site manager was replaced. The concerns were due to poor tenant screening and other managerial concerns. A new site manager was hired during the fourth quarter of 2008. The new manager began evicting problematic tenants as well as putting into place a more stringent tenant selection criteria for new applicants. This has helped to decrease police calls to the site. Further, as rents had not been increased in the last four years, management increased rents significantly. Despite the increase, rents were still lower than the market average. Many tenants moved out as a result of the rental increase. Others moved out due to management's enforcement of the rules, resulting in a decline in occupancy to 83% as of February 2009. Management increased marketing efforts and outreach in an effort to improve occupancy. Occupancy has increased slightly averaging 86% for the year. Management believes that occupancy should continue to improve through 2009 and the property should operate around breakeven for the year. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the property's performance. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
Century East V, LP (Century East V Apartments) is a 24-unit development located in Bismarck, ND. In 2006 the property operated with a cash deficit while maintaining an average occupancy of 89%. In 2007, average occupancy improved to 93%, and the property began operating above breakeven. In 2008, average occupancy declined to 92%, with operations slightly below breakeven. Due to performance concerns, the site manager was replaced during the fourth quarter of 2008. The concerns were due to poor tenant screening and other managerial concerns. The new manager began evicting problematic tenants and put into place more stringent applicant approval standards. Further, as rents had not been increased in the last four years, management increased rents significantly. Despite the increase, rents were still lower than the market average. Many tenants moved out as a result of the rental rate increase. Others moved out due to management's enforcement of the rules, resulting in a decline in occupancy to 75% as of January 2009. Management increased marketing efforts and outreach. Occupancy has improved to 96% by the end of the September 2009. In addition, police incidents are down since the new manager assumed duties. Management believes that occupancy should continue to improve through 2009 and that the property will operate close to breakeven for the year. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the property's performance. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
North Hampton Place, LP (North Hampton Place Apartments) is a 36-unit family property located in Columbia, Missouri. Occupancy began to decline in 2006 to an average of 82%, primarily due to lack of marketing. Management increased the frequency of newspaper advertising and occupancy improved through 2006 and 2007, reaching 91% by December 2007. However, the property operated below breakeven. In 2008, occupancy averaged 86%, but has reportedly declined to 67% as of the end of the third quarter of 2009, with operations continuing below breakeven. As a result, management has received additional training in leasing and marketing. Due to resident complaints about maintenance issues, the staff has been replaced. The leasing office is now open Tuesday through Thursday evenings and every Saturday. In order to enhance the amenities at the site, a basketball court has been installed. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as necessary. The accounts payable balance increased from 2007 to 2008, and the investment general partner will continue to monitor the balance to ensure that there is no impact on operations. The mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance are current. The tax credit delivery period ended in 2006. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires at year-end 2010.
Centenary Housing, LP. (Centenary Tower Apartments) was a 100-unit senior property located in St. Louis, MO. The property operated at a deficit for the first time in 2005, due to operating expenses which exceeded the state average by 25%. Throughout 2006, third party management reports to the operating general partner and the investment general partner suggested that the property was operating adequately, although there were a few reports that drug use and other undesirable activity were increasing at the property. In the first quarter of 2007, the investment general partner learned that the City of St Louis had cited the property as a nuisance twice in 2006. The property's security and habitability had deteriorated sharply during the second half of 2006 and the first quarter of 2007, with over 700 police calls from June 15, 2006 - February 28, 2007. After an additional citation from the City in the first quarter of 2007, the management company resigned effective February 1, 2007. The operating general partner took over management and hired new security personnel, but security guards were ineffective. On February 28, 2007, the on-site manager was assaulted on the premises and the operating general partner was unable to re-establish a management presence at the property.
On March 2, 2007, the City of St. Louis conducted a hearing and ordered the building closed pursuant to public nuisance ordinances. The Department of Housing and Urban Development terminated the Housing Assistance Payment contract. The trustee for the bonds declared default under the bond documents. The operating general partner chose not to contest the City's order or HUD's contract termination after determining that the highest recovery for the bondholders and limited partners might result from a sale to a developer who would convert the property to a non-affordable use. The operating general partner worked with HUD and local municipal officials to relocate the tenants, which concluded in early July 2007. The operating general partner engaged a broker who began marketing the property, but after three months of market exposure during the third quarter of 2007, the property had failed to elicit any strong expressions of interest. The lack of interest was in part attributable to the general problems in the credit market that occurred in the third quarter of 2007. In October 2007, the operating general partner determined that it would be costly to carry the property through the winter and offered to consensually transfer the property to the bondholders' trustee. As of December 2007, the bondholders' trustee had effectively taken control of the property, although it had not formally accepted the deed. The bondholders' trustee has been attempting to market the property since late 2007, with numerous offers falling through. In August 2009, the trustee identified a buyer that agreed to purchase the property for $375,000 and scheduled a foreclosure sale for late September. The property was sold at foreclosure sale to this buyer on September 23, 2009 for $375,000, or less than $.20 of the face value of the bonds. There are no proceeds to be returned to cash reserves. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the foreclosure of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
Due to the property being shut down in 2007, investors lost 2007 tax credits and experienced recapture. The Operating Partnership lost $88,635 in credits and experienced recapture of $496,442. This represents credits and recapture of $40 and $224, respectively, per 1,000 BACs. The operating general partner has unlimited guarantees and the investment general partner intends to pursue payment under these guarantees in order to offset some or all of the expected recapture of tax credits. However, it is not certain at this time how much can be collected under the guarantees, based on the unknown financial strength of the guarantors.
Lake Apartments Limited Partnership (Lake Apartments I) is a 24-unit property located in Fargo, ND. During 2007, the property operated with an average occupancy of 93%, which was a 12% improvement from the prior year. In 2008, average occupancy was 92%, and the property operated below breakeven due to bad debt and high utility, real estate and turnover related expenses. Historically, management at this property has coordinated with Lutheran Social Services (LSS) to provide housing to new Americans despite no rental or credit history. As a result, the property was affected by unique cultural concerns. As many of these tenants move as a group, it was not uncommon to have a dramatic number of move-outs as an entire extended family would move-out all at once. In addition, many of the tenants were unfamiliar with apartment living. As such, maintenance and utility costs have historically been inordinately high. Management and LSS made concerted efforts to educate the tenants in order to reduce costs but had limited success. In addition, there have been a number of incidents at the property as a result of tenant conflicts. This resulted in a poor reputation in the community as local residents moved out after initial lease or refused to rent upon visiting the property. In 2008, management discontinued providing housing for LSS referrals without an established rental and credit history. In addition, leases of problematic tenants were not renewed. As such, occupancy declined to 79% in January 2009. The operating general partner is positioning the property for disposition upon the Operating Partnership's emergence from its compliance period in 2009. In addition to the change in leasing strategies, physical improvements are being made to increase marketability including new landscaping and appliances. Occupancy is averaging 86% year to date and continues to operate below breakeven. Management believes that occupancy should slowly improve throughout 2009. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations and assist management in improving leasing efforts and reducing operating expenses. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current.
In May 2009, the investment general partner of Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Laurelwood Park LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,093,596 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $108,413 and $53,397 to Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $23,450 and $11,550 from Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $6,114 and $3,011 from Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $78,849 and $38,836 were returned to cash reserves held by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amounts of $78,849 and $38,836 for Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, as of June 30, 2009.
Pahrump Valley is a 33-unit senior living facility located in Pahrump, Nevada. In 2008, the property maintained an average occupancy of 96% with operations below breakeven status. The 2008 deficit was funded by operating cash. The deficiency in operations can be attributable to operating expense related items of an aging property and low rent levels. The large increase in operating expenses consists of higher utility rates and maintenance incurred from turnover. Management indicated that to combat the utilities increase, primarily due to water and sewer rates, water saving devices such as new shower heads and faucets have been installed in units. Management has reported that turnover has decreased in 2009. The property will begin to fund turnover costs from a well funded replacement reserve account, as opposed to drawing down the operating cash account, as was the practice in 2008. In the first quarter of 2009, management received a $56/unit annual rent increase from USDA, but was denied a semi-annual rent request increase in the second quarter of 2009. At the end of September 2009, the property recorded occupancy of 100%, with operations slightly below breakeven. In September, management submitted a 2010 budget to USDA requesting a $100 rent increase for 2010. The rent increase is intended to combat rising utility costs, while providing the property the opportunity to breakeven. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are all current.
Series 25
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 20 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 25 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(339,081) and $(509,398), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,116,102 and $1,009,254, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Sutton Place Apartments, LP (Sutton Place Apartments) is a 360-unit apartment complex located in Indianapolis, Indiana. In January of 2005, the Operating Partnership underwent a change in the operating general partner, which was accompanied by a change in management. In 2005, the property's performance dipped below breakeven due to high operating expenses, mainly due to deferred maintenance. Given the size and difficult tenant base of the property, the original operating general partner did not have the resources to support the property long term. As a result, deferred maintenance items were not addressed and the property's physical condition declined. As a result, when the new operating general partner assumed the position, there was a significant amount of deferred maintenance and a number of vacant units that required significant repairs to make them marketable. Many of the more costly vacant units were down in efforts to turn over the other less costly units. The new management endeavored to address the maintenance items utilizing the existing replacement reserve account and available cash flow. Unfortunately, the available escrowed funds and cash flow have not proven to be sufficient. Capital expenditures in the amounts of $133,000 for 2005 and $190,000 for 2006 were contributed by the operating general partners; however, this was not enough to address all physical concerns. As a result, the property failed the 2007 Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) inspection and management lost the confidence of HUD, resulting in a HUD required management change. With the approval of the investment general partner, the operating general partner secured a $500,000 bridge loan to address all items raised by REAC, as well as additional rehab items on all units.
A new management company was hired to assume management duties in February 2008. Since that time, they have rehabbed all the vacant and down units and have made significant improvements to the tenant base at the property. The site manager was replaced with a more seasoned manager. A number of problematic tenants were evicted and screening criteria were strengthened in efforts to re-tenant the property. In addition, the new management company has been working closely with the local social service organizations and the local authorities in order to preserve the security at the property as well as improve the reputation in the community. New programs and amenities including a computer room have been introduced. A stronger maintenance team has also been employed. Since assuming duties, management has steadily improved occupancy to average 91% in 2008 with a fourth quarter average of 96%. In addition, criminal incidents are down for the year as the property is being re-tenanted. Utilizing the bridge loan funds, the rehab project was completed in November 2008. HUD performed its Real Estate Assessment Center inspection and the property successfully passed and is no longer being monitored by HUD's Department Enforcement Center.
The operating general partner has received terms on new debt to refinance the existing permanent mortgage and bridge loan. The refinance is in preliminary stages with HUD and approval is not expected until the fourth quarter of 2009. In addition, stage one of the six stage Housing Assistance Payment contract on the property was extended one month to October 31, 2009. On November 1, 2009, all six stages of the contract will be renewed as a combined contract for five years with an average rent increase of 1.7%. Management has transitioned its focus to the high tenant receivables it inherited. Through payment arrangements and ongoing evictions, outstanding rents are being collected and non-paying tenants are being evicted. Prior to the new management company assuming management duties, maintenance requests were not being addressed by the site staff. The new maintenance staff has been aggressive in addressing all outstanding tenant maintenance requests as well as developing a comprehensive preventative maintenance program. As a result, maintenance expense for 2008 is significantly higher than historical, but should normalize in 2009. The property operated below breakeven in 2008 due to high operating expenses as new management stabilized the property. Through the third quarter of 2009, average occupancy is 90%, and the property is operating slightly below breakeven. Since assumption of the operating general partner position, the operating general partner has continued to fund operating deficits despite fulfilling the obligations per the Operating Partnership agreement. The investment general partner will continue to work with the operating general partner in refinancing the outstanding debt as well as continue to work with the new management company to assist in improving collection and leasing efforts. All real estate tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are current.
In September 2009, the investment general partner of Sutton Place Apartments Limited Partnership approved an agreement to sell the property and the transaction is anticipated to close in December 2009. The anticipated sales price for the property is $9,800,000, which includes the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $5,290,000 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partners of $937,226. Of the total proceeds anticipated to be received, $50,000 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the sale. Of the remaining proceeds, it is anticipated that $15,000 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the sale, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds from the sale of $872,226 is anticipated to be returned to cash reserves. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution.
M.R.H., LP (The Mary Ryder Home), is a 48-unit property located in St. Louis, MO. Despite strong occupancy, the property operated with a deficit in 2007 and 2008. The loss was due to a large increase in real estate taxes in 2007. In 1997, the City of St. Louis granted the property a tax abatement that expired in 2006. The operating general partner erroneously thought the abatement went through 2007, so they had not budgeted for the large increase in real estate taxes. Per the operating general partner, the City of St. Louis will not extend the abatement; however, the operating general partner is working with his counsel to appeal the assessment for the upcoming tax year. The operating general partner discussed the assessment with the firm who did the original appraisal of the property. The assessment firm offered its services pro-bono. In the third quarter of 2009, the first round of the tax appeal process resulted in a reduction of the tax assessment by approximately 50% which results in an estimated $18,000 in taxes. The operating general partner and the tax consultant feel the taxes should be reduced further and are continuing to appeal the current assessment. The property was also reclassified from a commercial property to a residential property. The property has been paying the higher tax amount through the entire tax appeal process; all payments are current. If the second round of the appeal process is not successful, the investment general partner and operating general partner will work together to determine if a withdrawal request from the operating reserve will be required to cover the real estate tax expense. The property continues to operate below breakeven through the third quarter of 2009 due to high operating expenses. The current deficits are being funded through charitable contributions and operating general partner advances. Despite the cash deficit, the Operating Partnership has no debt. The operating deficit guarantee is unlimited in time and amount.
In May 2009, the investment general partner of Series 25 entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Dogwood Park LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,307,114 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $46,846. Of the total proceeds received, $37,721 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $9,125 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. There are no proceeds to be returned to cash reserves. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
In May 2009, the investment general partner of Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Laurelwood Park LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,093,596 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $108,413 and $53,397 to Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $23,450 and $11,550 from Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $6,114 and $3,011 from Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. The remaining proceeds of $78,849 and $38,836 will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 24 and Series 25, respectively. The monies held in cash reserves will be utilized to pay current operating expenses, accrued but unpaid asset management fees, and accrued but unpaid expenses of the investment partnership. After all outstanding obligations of the investment partnership are satisfied, any remaining monies will be distributed based on the number of BACs held by each investor at the time of distribution. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, a gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership, net of the overhead and expense reimbursement, has been recorded in the amounts of $78,849 and $38,836 for Series 24 and Series 25, respectively, as of June 30, 2009.
Series 26
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 43 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 26 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(382,656) and $(330,611), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,313,636 and $1,431,429, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
In June 2009, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its investment limited partner interest in Cameron Apartments to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $578,473 and cash proceeds to the investment limited partner of $0. There are no proceeds to be returned to cash reserves. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
The Willows, (The Willows Apartments) is a 32-unit multifamily development located in Smithville, Texas. In 2007, occupancy declined as a result of management evicting non-paying tenants as well as tenants moving out due to the condition of the property. The property is in need of interior and exterior rehabilitation. The operating general partner is working with Rural Development to set up a workout plan because the complex does not have the cash flow to cover the cost of the necessary repairs. In 2008, occupancy averaged 92% and the property operated at breakeven. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy dipped to 75%, and the property continued to operate below breakeven. Additionally, there are mandatory Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) repairs that need to be addressed. TDHCA and Rural Development have encouraged the operating general partner to file an application for a Housing Trust Fund loan totaling $500,000 to rehabilitate the property. The operating general partner submitted the application and is awaiting reply. Management is diligently following up with recent traffic and inquiries, as well as posting advertisements on free on-line sites, local grocery stores, businesses and restaurants in an effort to increase occupancy to generate additional revenue. Other measures include blanketing the immediate area with flyers and working with local non-profit agencies and area employers. The investment general partner will monitor the progress of the proposed Housing Trust Fund loan. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires in 2010. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
Country Edge, LP (Country Edge Apts.) is a 48-unit property located in Fargo, North Dakota. During 2007, the property operated with an average occupancy of 90%, which was a 10% increase from the prior year. Despite this increase, there was a decline in occupancy during the last two months of 2007, as occupancy ended the year at 77%. Through 2008, occupancy improved to an annual average of 87% and operated below breakeven due to high economic vacancy, high real estate taxes and high utility expenses. Historically, management at this property has coordinated with Lutheran Social Services to provide housing to new Americans despite no rental or credit history. As a result, the property was affected by unique cultural concerns. As many of these tenants move as a group, it is not uncommon to have a dramatic number of move-outs as an entire extended family may move-out all at once. In addition, many of the tenants are unfamiliar with apartment living. As such, maintenance and utility costs are inordinately high. Management and LSS made concerted efforts to educate the tenants in order to reduce costs but had limited success. In addition, there have been a number of incidents at the property as a result of tenant conflicts. This resulted in a poor reputation in the community as local residents moved out after initial lease or refused to rent upon visiting the property. In 2008, management discontinued providing housing for LSS referrals without an established rental and credit history. In addition, leases of problematic tenants were not renewed. Occupancy year to date is averaging 76% with operations continuing below breakeven status. The operating general partner is positioning the property for disposition upon the Operating Partnership's emergence from its compliance period in 2012. In addition to the change in leasing strategies, physical improvements such as new landscaping and appliance replacement are being made to increase the marketability of the project. Management believes occupancy should slowly improve, but realistically won't break 90% in 2009. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations to insure occupancy continues to improve and stabilizes above 90%. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current.
Grandview Apartments, LP (Grandview Apts.) is a 36-unit property located in Fargo, North Dakota. Average occupancy for 2007 was 92%, an 11% improvement from the prior year. Despite this improvement, Grandview operated below breakeven for the year due to higher than average expenses from turnover costs and bad debt expense. In 2008, average occupancy declined to 85%, and the property continued to operate below breakeven due to high vacancy, high real estate taxes, turnover costs and utility expenses. Historically, management at this property has coordinated with Lutheran Social Services to provide housing to new Americans despite no rental or credit history. As a result, the property has been affected by unique cultural concerns. As many of these tenants move as a group, it is not uncommon to have a dramatic number of move-outs as an entire extended family may move-out all at once. In addition, many of the tenants are unfamiliar with apartment living. As such, maintenance and utility costs were inordinately high. Management and LSS made concerted efforts to educate the tenants in order to reduce costs but had limited success. In addition, there have been a number of incidents at the property as a result of tenant conflicts. This resulted in a poor reputation in the community as local residents moved out after initial lease or refused to rent upon visiting the property. In 2008, management discontinued providing housing for LSS referrals without an established rental and credit history. In addition, leases of problematic tenants were not renewed. Occupancy is averaging 87% year to date with operations continuing below breakeven status. The operating general partner is positioning the property for disposition upon the Operating Partnership's emergence from its compliance period in 2011. In addition to the change in leasing strategies, physical improvements such as new landscaping and appliance replacement are being completed to enhance the marketability of the property. Management believes occupancy should slowly improve throughout 2009. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations and assist management in improving leasing efforts and reducing operating expenses. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current.
Lake Apartments IV Limited Partnership (Lake Apartments IV) is a 24-unit property located in Fargo, ND. During 2007 the property operated with an average occupancy of 92%, which was a 12% improvement from the prior year. Through 2008, average occupancy was 83%, and operations were below breakeven due to high economic vacancy, real estate taxes, turnover costs and utility expenses. Historically, management at this property has coordinated with Lutheran Social Services to provide housing to new Americans despite no rental or credit history. As a result, the property was affected by unique cultural concerns. As many of these tenants moved as a group, it was not uncommon to have a dramatic number of move-outs as an entire extended family would move-out all at once. In addition, many of the tenants were unfamiliar with apartment living. As such, maintenance and utility costs have historically been inordinately high. Management and LSS made concerted efforts to educate the tenants in order to reduce costs but had limited success. In addition, there have been a number of incidents at the property as a result of tenant conflicts. This resulted in a poor reputation in the community as local residents moved out after initial lease or refused to rent upon visiting the property. In 2008, management discontinued providing housing for LSS referrals without an established rental and credit history. In addition, leases of problematic tenants were not renewed. As such, occupancy declined to 75% during the fourth quarter of 2008. The operating general partner is positioning the property for disposition upon the Operating Partnership's emergence from its compliance period in 2010. In addition to the change in leasing strategies, physical improvements such as new landscaping and appliances are being made to increase the marketability of the property. Occupancy year to date is averaging 76% with operations below breakeven status. Management believes occupancy should slowly improve, but realistically won't break 90% in 2009. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations and assist management in improving leasing efforts and reducing operating expenses. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current.
Calgory Apartments II, LP (Calgory Apartments II) is a 24-unit development in Bismarck, ND. In 2007, the property operated with an average occupancy of 86%, which was down by 6% from the prior year. As a result of the increase in vacancies, the property operated slightly below breakeven in 2007. In 2008, average occupancy was 94% and the property operated above breakeven for the year. However, during the fourth quarter, occupancy declined to 83%. Due to performance concerns, the site manager was replaced. The concerns were due to poor tenant screening and other managerial concerns. A new site manager was hired during the fourth quarter of 2008. The new manager began evicting problematic tenants. Now more stringent tenant selection criteria are in place to help reduce bad debt and improve the reputation of the community going forward. Despite the December 2008 rent increase, rents are still lower than market averages. Occupancy as of September 30, 2009 is averaging 88% with operations remaining below breakeven status. Many tenants moved out as a result of the rent increase and others were evicted. As a result, police incidents are down at the site. Management believes that occupancy should continue to improve through 2009 and that the property should operate close to breakeven for the year. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the property's performance. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
East Park II, LP (East Park Apartments II) is a 24-unit development in Dilworth, MN. Average occupancy for 2007 was 72% with operations below breakeven due to the combination of increased vacancy loss and a significant increase in turnover costs. The property is located in a highly competitive area. The 2007 decline in occupancy was due primarily to new townhouse units with garages being built in the immediate area, offering rents that were competitive to those at East Park Apartments. The Operating Partnership is comprised primarily of two and three bedroom units. As a result, the majority of these units appeal to families. The property had experienced an increase in turnover as the families move to the larger townhouse homes. In early 2007, a Wal-Mart opened next to the property. This had a significant impact on the property's performance as the property became highly visible and was now located in a more desirable area. In addition, more resources are being committed to the property in order to make the units more marketable. In 2008, the operating general partner began replacing appliances, carpet and flooring. In addition, the roof was replaced. In 2009, new siding is being installed and the parking lot will be resurfaced and re-striped. Occupancy as of September 30, 2009 is 71% and the property continues to operate above breakeven. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
Butler Estates A L.D.H.A. (Butler Estates Apartments) is a 10-unit development located in Leesville, Louisiana. In 2007, the property operated below breakeven with an average occupancy of 60%. In July 2008, the investment general partner conducted a site inspection at the property. The results indicated that the property was in need of repairs and cleaning. At the time of the inspection, all ten units were vacant. The operating general partner reports that the complex has been shut down, as it is not viable in its current condition. The operating general partner's guarantee expired in 2002. In 2009, the investment general partner has worked with the operating general partner in an effort to bring the property back on-line. As of the end of the third quarter 2009, the property is 60% occupied. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires in 2011. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current. The operating general partner has confirmed he will continue to keep these items current.
Warrensburg Heights Limited Partnership (Warrensburg Heights) is a 28-unit elderly property located in Warrensburg, Missouri. The property operated slightly below breakeven in 2008 as a result of maintaining an average occupancy of 76%. Occupancy was an issue in 2008 due to a limited amount of rental assistance and a saturated rental market. The property operated above breakeven through the third quarter of 2009 due to improved occupancy. As of September 30, 2009, occupancy was 96%. Occupancy improved from 2008 due to the hiring of a new site manager who focused efforts on extensive advertising. Throughout the third quarter of 2009, the site manager ran daily and weekly newspaper ads in the Warrensburg paper, created daily shoppers, posted flyers in convenience stores, and placed flutter flags and vacancy signs at the complex. Social Service agencies were contacted for referrals. These marketing efforts are anticipated to further increase occupancy in the fourth quarter of 2009 and maintain above breakeven operations. The mortgage payments, taxes, and insurance are current.
In May 2009, the investment general partner entered into an agreement to transfer its interest in Edgewood Park LP to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $1,216,737 and cash proceeds to the investment partnership of $34,094. Of the total proceeds received, $24,969 represents reporting fees due to an affiliate of the investment partnership and the balance represents proceeds from the transfer. Of the remaining proceeds, $9,125 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. No proceeds will be returned to cash reserves. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the sale of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
Calgory Apartments III, LP (Calgory Apartments III) is a 24-unit development in Bismarck, ND. In 2008, average occupancy was 94% and the property operated slightly below breakeven for the year. However, during the fourth quarter, occupancy declined to 83%. Due to performance concerns, the site manager was replaced. The concerns were due to poor tenant screening and other managerial concerns. A new site manager was hired during the fourth quarter of 2008. The new manager began evicting problematic tenants. Now more stringent tenant selection criteria are in place to help reduce bad debt and improve the reputation of the community going forward. Despite the December 2008 rent increase, rents are still lower than market averages. Many tenants moved out as a result of the rent increase and others were evicted, resulting in an average occupancy of 81% year to date with below breakeven operations. Management has increased marketing efforts and outreach with the hopes of increasing occupancy back above 90% by year-end. In addition, police incidents are down. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the property's performance. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
Beckwood Manor One Limited Partnership (Westside Apartments) is a 29-unit, senior property, located in Salem, Arkansas. In 2008, occupancy averaged 76% and the property operated breakeven. The low occupancy, combined with slightly higher than average operating expenses, caused the decline in operations. The property receives rental assistance for 28 units, but the target market of residents is limited. The property is offering two months of free rent as a leasing incentive. The management company continues to advertise heavily in the immediate and surrounding areas. Occupancy has averaged 71% through the third quarter of 2009 with operations below breakeven status. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits as needed. The mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and accounts payables are all current.
Series 27
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 16 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 27 reflects a net income (loss) from Operating Partnerships of $158,320 and $(188,296), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $853,345 and $859,059, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Holly Heights, LP (Holly Heights Apartments) is a 30-unit property located in Storm Lake, Iowa. This property operated with an average occupancy of 90% through the third quarter of 2009. Despite this high occupancy, the property has continued to incur operating deficits due to low rental rates coupled with a high interest rate on the permanent mortgage. Management has presented the loan to various lenders, but the net operating income of the property cannot support a new loan. Per an agreement with the operating general partner, the management company, an affiliate of the operating general partner, is deferring all fees until operations improve. The operating general partner continued to fund deficits through the third quarter of 2008, his guarantee being unlimited in time and amount, but ceased to fully support the property's operations in the fourth quarter of 2008. As of the end of the second quarter of 2009, the 2008 real estate taxes, in the amount of $12,841, had not been paid. Property taxes in Iowa are paid in semi-annual installments due in September of the same year and March of the following year. Real estate taxes become delinquent if not paid by April 1. A tax sale occurred on June 15, 2009. To prevent the property being given to the new tax sale holder, the investment general partner advanced funds to the Operating Partnership in July of 2009 to pay the taxes; they are now current. The mortgage and insurance payments are also current.
Angelou Court (Angelou Court Apts.) is a 23-unit co-op property located in Harlem, New York. The Operating Partnership operated below breakeven in 2007 due to increasing resident receivables and high operating expenses. Occupancy was at 96% as of September 2009, but tenant collections remain an issue and accounts payable continue to increase. Management has been pursuing a more aggressive collection and eviction procedure. The operating general partner and the investment general partner continue to proactively monitor these problematic collections closely. A 2% rent increase was effective for January 2009 and a special increase requested for the maximum amount allowable of 10% was approved by New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) effective June 2009. Additional increases are being proposed for 2010 and 2011. The requests hinge on the property's inability to pay expenses at the current rent levels. The operating general partner and management continue to explore options to reduce utility costs, including educating residents about conservation and seeking grants from utility companies. The property pays no real estate taxes as the result of the operating general partner's non-profit, tax-exempt status. In January 2009 the operating general partner received approval from the lender and DHCR for release of operating reserve funds to bring the mortgage payments current. In the second quarter of 2009, the investment general partner met with management and the operating general partner and completed a site inspection. The visit revealed that the property is very well maintained physically; however, there are management and policy issues in the areas of collections and bookkeeping. The operating general partner has funded deficits, but not at the levels required. The operating general partner has stated that there are funds available to address future deficits as needed. Management indicated that the main area of concern is high accounts payable, which are predicated upon high accounts receivable. The tenant delinquency report and rent roll indicate that a significant portion of the accounts receivable are attributable to tenants who have inhabited the property for more than 10 years. To help combat increases in tenant receivables management is implementing the following measures: a stricter tenant screening process, a change in legal counsel for tenant court, and an analysis of "tenant hold over" (court process, with hope of rent collection) versus "tenant non-payment" (eviction with no hope of rent collection). General legal proceedings take at least six months before a tenant will have to appear in rent court in front of a judge. History shows that legal decisions in New York City involving low-income housing tend to rule in favor of the tenant. The mortgage is two months in arrears and insurance one month in arrears.
Kiehl Partners (Park Crest Apartments) is a 216-unit property located in Sherwood, AR. In 2008, the property operated above breakeven, despite a drop in occupancy from 2007 levels. The property was helped by the low floating rate on the bond. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property continues to operate above breakeven with the help of the low floating rate on the bond, increased occupancy and management's efforts to decrease expenses. While the property manager appears strong, occupancy had struggled for the first half of 2009 due to management's inability to obtain funding necessary to turn the vacant units. The investment general partner addressed this issue with the operating general partner in the second quarter of 2009. The investment general partner suggested that the operating general partner contact the lender in regards to releasing the replacement reserve money directly to the contractors as the work is being completed. In the past the operating general partner would have to pay for the work up front, and then be reimbursed once the work was completed. The lender has agreed to release the reserve money early. The work on the majority of the down units was completed in the third quarter and the remaining work will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2009. As of September 30, 2009 the property was 90% occupied and 94% leased. The investment general partner and management continue to work together to address turnover and stabilize occupancy. To help improve occupancy, management has increased local advertising and is offering leasing concessions. Management has revised their screening and collections policy to make them more stringent. To retain residents, management has increased activities at the site to make residents feel more at home. They have at least two events per month including birthday parties, holiday parties and GED classes with additional activities for the children held through the summer months. Both the accounts payable and the bad debt have shown vast improvements at the end of the third quarter. Since the property never converted to a fixed rate financing, all operating deficits are guaranteed by the operating general partner's completion guarantee. The investment general partner will continue bi-monthly conference calls with the regional manager to monitor operations and ensure that occupancy continues to improve. All tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
Lake Apartments II Limited Partnership (Lake Apartments II) is a 24-unit property located in Fargo, ND. During 2007, the property operated with an average occupancy of 95%, which was a 10% improvement from the prior year. In 2008, average occupancy was 92%, and the property operated below breakeven due to high economic vacancy, utility costs, real estate taxes and turnover related expenses. Historically, management at this property has coordinated with Lutheran Social Services to provide housing to new Americans despite no rental or credit history. As a result, the property was affected by unique cultural concerns. As many of these tenants move as a group, it was not uncommon to have a dramatic number of move-outs as an entire extended family would move-out all at once. In addition, many of the tenants were unfamiliar with apartment living. As such, maintenance and utility costs have historically been inordinately high. Management and LSS made concerted efforts to educate the tenants in order to reduce costs but had limited success. In addition, there have been a number of incidents at the property as a result of tenant conflicts. This resulted in a poor reputation in the community as local residents moved out after initial lease or refused to rent upon visiting the property. In 2008, management discontinued providing housing for LSS referrals without an established rental and credit history. In addition, leases of problematic tenants were not renewed. The operating general partner is positioning the property for disposition upon the Operating Partnership's emergence from its compliance period in 2010. In addition to the change in leasing strategies, physical improvements such as new landscaping and appliance replacements are being made to increase the marketability of the property. Year to date the property is averaging 92% occupancy with operations close to breakeven. Management believes occupancy should slowly improve throughout 2009. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits as operations are supported by an unlimited guarantee. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations and assist management in improving leasing efforts and reducing operating expenses. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes, and insurance are current.
Series 28
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 26 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 28 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(847,332) and $(615,676), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,119,563 and $1,179,400, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Cottonwood Partnership (Cottonwood Apartments) is a 24-unit multifamily development located in Cottonwood, Louisiana. During 2007, occupancy averaged 83% and the property operated below breakeven status. Rents were increased in 2007, and a number of residents were evicted as a result of non-payment of rent, lease violations, or suspected criminal activity. In 2008, the rent increase added approximately $3,000 in additional revenue and operating expenses decreased substantially from 2007 levels. In 2008, occupancy averaged 77% and the property operated below breakeven. Management has had difficulty maintaining occupancy. Several units that turned over due to non-payment of rent had damages. Occupancy ended the third quarter of 2009 at 63%. Management continues to market the complex aggressively while enforcing strict resident selection standards to minimize non-payment issues. According to the first quarter 2009 un-audited financial statements, maintenance expenses were 120% over budget and were 215% above the same period last year. According to the site manager, the increase in expenses is due to Rural Development required repairs. Expenses have stabilized in the third quarter and are expected to remain in line with historic averages over the remainder of 2009.
During the first week of September 2008, Hurricane Gustav hit land southwest of New Orleans as a Category Two storm causing damages to the complex. An insurance adjuster has been to the site to review damages. Preliminary reports cite shingles missing from all buildings, the complex sign is down, and screens and windows need to be replaced and/or repaired. An insurance claim has been submitted and all related labor and materials are being priced. The operating general partner is planning to use his construction company to complete the repairs; however, the insurance proceeds have not been released. The Operating Partnership is not expected to breakeven in 2009. The investment general partner will continue to monitor occupancy and assist management in finding ways to improve operations going forward. Furthermore, the investment general partner will continue to monitor the progress of the insurance claim and the repairs to the property, as well as assisting the operating general partner gaining approval for a much needed rent increase. The operating general partner is funding deficits as necessary. The guarantee is unlimited in amount until the end of the low-income housing tax credit compliance period in 2012. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
Fairway II LDHA, (Fairway Apartments II) is a 48-unit family rehabilitation property located in Marlette, MI. In 2008 the property operated below breakeven due to a drop in occupancy and an increase in administrative and maintenance expenses. The property also recorded a slight increase in accounts payable in 2008. At the end of 2008, the property manager was replaced. The new site manager believes that at the very minimum the property should occupy 44 out of the 48 units, due to subsidies on 44 units. The new site manager increased occupancy in the first quarter of 2009. However, occupancy dropped at the beginning of the second quarter of 2009 due to the eviction of difficult tenants that were admitted under the previous management's tenure in 2008. Occupancy has stabilized at 92% during the third quarter of 2009. There was one unit offline throughout the first two quarters of 2009 due to flooding and molding issues. Maintenance graded the ground in 2008 to rectify the problem. During the first three quarters of 2009, management received $25,000 in reserves in order to implement a new drainage system, excavate the damaged unit and place the unit back online. Management does not foresee any large maintenance problems in 2009, and has been able to reduce the payable balance. In the third quarter of 2009, management joined the "continuum of care", a local committee that is involved in low income housing organizations and making low income housing a better product and more efficient. The management joined the committee with the objective of attaining vouchers for the 4 non-subsidized units. The property has also begun marketing on Facebook and Craigslist. Management is offering specials such as a reduced security deposit, referral fee, and one-months free rent in order to rent the four non-subsidized units. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are all current.
Maplewood Apartments Partnership (Maplewood Apartments) is a 40-unit property located in Winnfield, Louisiana. In 2007, the operating general partner reached out to the Louisiana Housing Finance Agency (LHFA) to prove that a substantial rent increase was essential to keep the complex running. Management was aware that the complex would lose most of the tenants when the new rates were applied. However, they were able to illustrate that this would be the groundwork for turning the project around. LHFA agreed and a $50 per unit rent increase was implemented on all units. As expected, tenants moved out or skipped, as they could not afford the new rates. As a result, occupancy averaged 62% for 2007, yet the rent increase helped to generate as much revenue as was received in 2006. In 2008, occupancy averaged 62%, and the property operated below breakeven. In addition to the rent increase, the vacancy problems were also attributed to a new manager who was experienced with troubled properties. Aggressive efforts to improve the resident base resulted in evictions filed as a result of non-payment of rent, lease violations, and/or suspected criminal activity. The operating general partner is hopeful that the manager's experience will help to improve occupancy and operations in 2009. In an effort to bring in more qualified traffic, the manager is blanketing the immediate area with flyers and working with local non-profit agencies and area employers. Occupancy at the end of the third quarter of 2009 was 78% and the property operated above breakeven for the quarter. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits as necessary by deferring fees. The guarantee is unlimited in time and amount. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
1374 Boston Road, LP (1374 Boston Road) is a 15-unit property located in the Bronx, New York. In 2003, the Operating Partnership recorded a $112,000 loan from the operating general partner to pay for a tax lien. Further investigation showed that the tax lien was incurred during the construction period, and should have been funded by the operating general partner, without reimbursement, as part of his obligation to complete construction of the property per the Operating Partnership Agreement and the Development Agreement. The investment general partner's repeated requests to restructure the loan went unheeded. In September 2005, legal counsel for the investment general partner sent a letter demanding a removal of the loan from the Operating Partnership account and the return of all payments made on this loan. The operating general partner's response did not address the issue satisfactorily. Additionally, in December 2005, a title search on the Operating Partnership showed at least $60,000 in liens that were never reported to the investment general partner. The investment general partner evaluated what the impact of removing the operating general partner would be since these lien issues remain unresolved. The investment general partner has decided not to proceed due to the inadequate value of the property (based on size and location), as well as the operating general partner's continued funding, neither of which supports an extended legal battle for removal.
In 2008, the property operated with an average occupancy of 99% with below breakeven operations. In 2009, occupancy remains strong at 100%. The investment general partner continues to monitor this property. The mortgage, property taxes and insurance are current. The tax credit delivery period ended in 2007, with the low income housing tax credit compliance period expires in 2011.
Series 29
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the Series was 96.4%. The series had a total of 21 properties at September 30, 2009, of which 20 were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 29 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(1,007,144) and $(994,489), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,208,537 and $1,217,456, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Lombard Partners, LP (Lombard Heights Apts.) located in Springfield, Missouri, operated below breakeven starting in 2005. The property suffered from ineffective management, which led to poor physical condition and low occupancy. Average occupancy was 72%, 47% and 70%, respectively, in 2005, 2006 and 2007. In the first quarter of 2007, the investment general partner learned that the property was five months in arrears on its mortgage and that the lender had issued a notice of default. The lender replaced on-site management with a third-party management company at the end of the second quarter of 2007. To stabilize the property, the lender depleted the replacement reserve account to fund unit turnovers, which improved occupancy to the mid-90s. The investment general partner and the lender discussed a possible workout, which included replenishing the reserves and paying down the outstanding mortgage. In December 2007, the lender polled the bondholders for their preference in resolving the default. They were given the options of foreclosure sale, 18-month debt forbearance as part of a workout plan, or refinancing the property. On June 30, 2008 the lender notified the investment general partner that the bondholders had approved proceeding with a foreclosure sale. The property was sold on July 31, 2008 for $772,800. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain from the sale of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
As a result of the foreclosure, the Operating Partnership lost remaining credits of $47,840. The investment general partner has determined that the new owner will not continue to operate the property as a Section 42 property. Therefore, the Operating Partnership also experienced recapture and interest of $199,516. This represents a loss of tax credits, and recapture and interest of $12 and $49, respectively, per 1,000 BACs. The investment general partner has started to pursue the guarantors under the guaranty with a view to recovering the investment limited partner's losses. Counsel recently resolved jurisdictional issues and is now pursuing the guarantors in Massachusetts. Additionally, the operating general partner's attorney withdrew as counsel in September 2009. While the individual guarantors have the option of representing themselves and proceeding pro se, the court ordered the operating general partner's ownership entity to obtain new counsel and file a notice of appearance by November 2009. Failure to comply with the court order risks sanctions up to and including a default judgment. These developments increase the likelihood of some recovery from the guarantors but the size of that recovery is difficult to predict because the guarantors' financial strength is unknown at this time. To date, the parties have been unable to agree on the appropriate size of a settlement, but discussions are ongoing.
Bryson Apartments, Limited Partnership (Pecan Hill Apartments) is a 16-unit development located in Bryson, TX. Despite average occupancy of 79% during 2007, the property operated above breakeven. In an effort to increase occupancy, a new site manager was hired in the fourth quarter of 2007. Occupancy has shown signs of improvement, averaging 85% for 2008 and increasing slightly to 88% through the first quarter of 2009, but decreased again to 81% in through the third quarter. Year-to-date operations are slightly below breakeven. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as necessary. The mortgage, taxes and insurance are all current.
Northfield Apartments III, LP (Willow Point Apartments III) is a 120-unit property located in Jackson, Mississippi. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property continues to operate below breakeven due to low occupancy and high operating expenses. Occupancy has dropped in 2009 and ended the third quarter 70% occupied. The operating general partner has stated that the drop in occupancy is due to new competition in the area, the depressed local economy and turnover in management. To help increase occupancy, management has increased marketing to local businesses. They are leaving fliers with property information, rental rates and specials. Management continues to lower rents and offer concessions of up to one month free rent to help increase occupancy. Management also implemented a resident referral program at the beginning of the third quarter. A new property manager was hired in the second week of June 2009. She has extensive management experience and the operating general partner is very confident that she will be able to improve occupancy. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the new property manager's progress and commissioned a third party shop to assess the new manager's leasing skills in the third quarter. The management company has also advised that they are in the process of hiring a second regional property manager for the Jackson, MS market. They feel this is a difficult market and having a second Regional Property Manager will provide the proper oversight and attention to help improve occupancy and overall operations. High maintenance, utility and bad debt expenses have also contributed to the decline in operations. The accounts payable balance remains high. Maintenance expenses are high due to the increased turnover at the property and the need to make vacant units rent ready. To retain residents and decrease turnover, management is offering incentives to current residents such as carpet cleanings, touch up painting and a renewal concession equal to one-half month's rent. Utility expenses are high due to exorbitant water rates in the City of Jackson. Management continues to contact the city about potentially lowering rates, but has been unsuccessful. The investment general partner will continue to work with management to strengthen their collection procedures and has asked management and the operating general partner to track their screening criteria to ensure they are renting to residents with strong rental history. The investment general partner addressed the high accounts payable issue with the operating general partner in the third quarter. The operating general partner did advance some funds to the Partnership in the third quarter, but payables continue to grow. The investment general partner will continue to follow up with management to ensure aged payables do not impact operations. The investment general partner performed a management review and site inspection in October of 2009. The property manager appears qualified for the position and the physical condition of the property was good. All taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Forest Hill Apartments, L.P. (The Arbors) is an 85-unit, senior property located in Richmond, VA. In the first quarter of 2004, the property was severely damaged by a fire. There were no reported injuries as a result of the loss and all of the residents were successfully relocated. The fire marshal was unable to definitively determine the cause of the fire. The operating general partner received an initial insurance payment totaling $500,000 and at that time it was determined that the building should be razed due to the significant fire and water damage. In the third quarter 2004, the lender approved the release of sufficient insurance proceeds of $148,000 to raze the property. After bidding the property repairs, the operating general partner determined that there were additional costs of approximately $1.4 million due to building code changes since its original construction in 1998. The operating general partner's primary underwriter, and their excess property insurance carrier, determined that the policy did not cover code changes of more than $10,000. The operating general partner appealed their initial determination regarding additional coverage and in February 2006 the appeal was denied. The operating general partner received an additional insurance payment totaling $3 million dollars, representing the insurance company's estimate to rebuild the community minus the code change upgrades in dispute. The lender is currently holding the insurance proceeds. The operating general partner was able to reduce the original construction budget by $1,167,306. The main reductions in costs were site work, verticals and contingency. The reduction of the construction budget greatly reduced the originally anticipated shortfall of $1,257,519. As a result, in early October 2006, the operating general partner received a commitment letter from the Virginia Housing Development Authority indicating approval of the additional debt of $1,600,000. The construction of the project started in early November 2006, and was expected to be complete within nine to ten months. However, the Operating Partnership encountered some difficulties with permits during the early stages of construction, causing construction delays. The property received final certificates of occupancy in January 2008.
Lease-up was very slow through the year and as of December 2008, the property was 54% physically occupied and 58% leased with below breakeven operations. Through the second quarter of 2009, lease-up continued to be slow, and as of June 30, 2009, the property was 67% occupied. In the third quarter 2009 this property reached physical occupancy of 82%. All units have been qualified; however, maintaining high physical occupancy has been a great challenge for this community. Due to deteriorating economic conditions in the area, many seniors decided to move back with their children to provide an extra income for the family. Also, despite aggressive market outreach traffic has been slow. Many potential senior residents are unable to sell their houses. To attract residents, management is advertising on local buses and in all local senior newspapers, and offering one month free rent as a referral fee to its current residents. Also, management hosts monthly bingo sessions and offers daily blood pressure screenings. Mortgage, real estate taxes and property insurance are current. The operating general partner continues to fund all operating deficits as necessary. Due to the unanticipated slow lease-up, management has revised its original projections by pushing the lease-up date from October 2009 to December 2009.
Jackson Partners, LP, (Arbor Park Apartments) is a 160-unit property located in Jackson, Mississippi. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property has operated above breakeven with the help of improved occupancy, the low floating rate on the bonds and management's efforts to lower expenses. As of September 30, 2009 the occupancy was 92%. This is a vast improvement from 2008 average occupancy of 78%. In 2008, the drop in occupancy was the result of evictions of some troublesome residents and competition from the new supply of single-family tax credit homes that were in lease-up. In order to compete with the new competition, management is promoting move-in specials such as one free month of rent, no security deposits and waiving application fees. To retain residents and decrease turnover, management is offering incentives to current residents such as carpet cleanings, touch up painting and a renewal concession of half off first month's rent. The total operating expenses have shown an improvement through the third quarter of 2009. Both the administrative expense and bad debt have made significant improvements through the third quarter. The operating expenses that continue to hinder operations are maintenance expenses due to turnover, utility and real estate taxes. The utility expenses are high due to exorbitant water rates in the City of Jackson. Management continues to contact the city about potentially lowering rates, but has been unsuccessful. Management has also appealed the high taxes to the City of Jackson, but the city will not lower the assessment. The accounts payable remain high, but have decreased by over $60,000. The investment general partner has talked with the operating general partner about the high payables at this property and the operating general partner has stated that if the Operating Partnership cannot generate sufficient cash to pay down the payables, they will advance money to help lower the payables in the fourth quarter. The investment general partner will continue bi-monthly calls with management to monitor operations. The investment general partner performed a management review and site inspection in October of 2009. The property manager appears qualified for the position and the physical condition of the property was good. All taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Kiehl Partners (Park Crest Apartments) is a 216-unit property located in Sherwood, AR. In 2008, the property operated above breakeven, despite a drop in occupancy from 2007 levels. The property was helped by the low floating rate on the bond. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property continues to operate above breakeven with the help of the low floating rate on the bond, increased occupancy and management's efforts to decrease expenses. While the property manager appears strong, occupancy had struggled for the first half of 2009 due to management's inability to obtain funding necessary to turn the vacant units. The investment general partner addressed this issue with the operating general partner in the second quarter of 2009. The investment general partner suggested that the operating general partner contact the lender in regards to releasing the replacement reserve money directly to the contractors as the work is being completed. In the past the operating general partner would have to pay for the work up front, and then be reimbursed once the work was completed. The lender has agreed to release the reserve money early. The work on the majority of the down units was completed in the third quarter and the remaining work will be completed in the fourth quarter of 2009. As of September 30, 2009 the property was 90% occupied and 94% leased. The investment general partner and management continue to work together to address turnover and stabilize occupancy. To help improve occupancy, management has increased local advertising and is offering leasing concessions. Management has revised their screening and collections policy to make them more stringent. To retain residents, management has increased activities at the site to make residents feel more at home. They have at least two events per month including birthday parties, holiday parties and GED classes with additional activities for the children held through the summer months. Both the accounts payable and the bad debt have shown vast improvements at the end of the third quarter. Since the property never converted to a fixed rate financing, all operating deficits are guaranteed by the operating general partner's completion guarantee. The investment general partner will continue bi-monthly conference calls with the regional manager to monitor operations and ensure that occupancy continues to improve. All tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
Series 30
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 18 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 30 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(354,720) and $(312,963), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $609,718 and $577,849, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
JMC, LLC (Farwell Mills Apts.) is a 27-unit development located in Lisbon, ME. In prior years, management had issues processing applications in a timely manner, resulting in move in delays. Many prospective residents were discouraged by the delays and often chose to live elsewhere. The investment general partner worked with the operating general partner to improve his affiliated management company's policies and procedures to increase application-processing speed and improve leasing techniques. Occupancy rebounded in 2007 with a 98% average and remained strong in 2008 averaging 94%. Occupancy averaged 91% through the third quarter of 2009.
Utilities are an issue for the property and fluctuate with seasonal demand. Management is researching a "Co-Gen" energy system, which utilizes micro-turbines and natural gas to produce heat as a by-product. The payback analysis has not been completed at this time; however, the operating general partner's engineers have determined that the Co-Gen system will be compatible with the property's current heating system. The operating general partner plans to test the Co-Gen system at one of his other properties. If the results are favorable, Farwell Mills Apartments will be the next site to implement the system. The operating general partner visited the investment general partner in October 2008 to discuss the energy alternatives he is researching throughout his portfolio including JMC, LLC.
Contractual services were high in the first quarter of 2008 because the grounds service company was not billing the property in a timely manner. Accumulated invoices from 2007 were all received in the first quarter of 2008. The property terminated its contract with this company and grounds are now maintained in-house. To further reduce expenses, Pen Bay Builders took over the full janitorial contract in 2008. Administrative expenses were high in 2008 because the company that management uses for credit/background checks had been charging the property incorrectly. The issue has been corrected, but the property was charged for several 2007 amounts in 2008. Bad debt was also an issue for the property in 2008. This was a result of poor on-site management. The on-site manager was not being aggressive enough on rent collections and was terminated in the fourth quarter of 2008. High operating expenses and high bad debt coupled with the dip in occupancy resulted in below breakeven operations for 2008. The property continues to operate below breakeven through the third quarter of 2009 due to high operating expenses and decreased occupancy. Utilities were over budget in the first quarter because of higher than expected gas expenses. Maintenance expenses were high due to several unexpected expenses in the first quarter. A tenant accidentally flooded their bathtub, which damaged their unit and the unit below. The units required cleaning and carpet cleaning to repair the water damage. The property also had multiple HVAC service calls in the first quarter, which contributed to high maintenance expenses. A new on-site manager and new regional manager were assigned to the property in the second quarter of 2009. The investment general partner visited the property in the third quarter of 2009 to inspect the property and evaluate the new on-site manager. The property does not have the funds necessary to address some of the larger aesthetic site improvements; however, the investment general partner was pleased to find the property and grounds were clean and well maintained under the new management team. The operating general partner funds cash deficits by deferring fees owed to his management company and his maintenance company (Pen Bay Builders). All tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The operating general partner's operating deficit guarantee, capped at $400,000, expires in July 2013.
Linden Partners II (Western Trails Apartments II) is a 30-unit property located in Council Bluffs, IA. This property has had inconsistent occupancy levels since 2003. In 2007 the property operated below breakeven due to increased utility and administrative expenses. Through the fourth quarter of 2008, occupancy remained consistent at 90%. In 2009 occupancy levels floated downward to 77% during the second quarter, but have since rebounded to 93% at the end of the third quarter. The property has operated slightly above breakeven through the third quarter as the management company spent $7,800 on replacement items versus formally funding the monthly reserve of $560. Total expenses (including debt service) of $135,000 were in line with the nine month budget. The condition of the property continues to improve with the available cash on hand.
Other tax credit communities in the area have been able to operate with higher occupancy levels while also having the ability to charge higher rents than Western Trails. This is primarily due to them being newer with superior amenities including additional bathrooms, garages, swimming pools and exercise facilities. Western Trails continues to struggle with the ability to improve curb appeal as well as maintain a high level of tenant retention. There are four major competitors located within a few miles of Western Trails Apartments II. Fortunately, there is redevelopment and growth taking place nearby that includes the following: a small retail mall, a new major employer (Google) taking occupancy in town, proposed improvement of the recreational fields and the construction of a large outlet mall projected to open in 2010.
As of the third quarter of 2009, the management company successfully pre-leased eight additional units for August occupancy. This accounted for the quarterly jump in occupancy. Starting at the end of the third quarter, management has been able to reinstitute advertising the property in the monthly rental magazines. The operating general partner is unable to fund the property as needed in order to complete physical improvements. The taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are all current.
Nocona Apartments, LP (Nocona Apartments) is a 36-unit property located in Nocona, Texas. Historically, the property has been plagued with low occupancy due to a stagnant local economy and a challenging rural location. Despite average occupancy of 87% during 2007, the property operated above breakeven mainly due to a rent increase implemented during the year. The 2007 occupancy declined due to evictions of undesirable tenants involved in drug related activity. At that time, the management company immediately trained a new site manager and focused on marketing and outreach. As a result, occupancy showed signs of improvement averaging 90% for 2008, with a further increase to 93% through the third quarter of 2009. The operating general partner has an unlimited guarantee in time and amount and continues to fund any shortfalls. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are all current. The tax credit delivery period ended in 2008 and the low-income housing tax credit compliance period expires in 2011.
Millwood Park, LP (Millwood Park Apartments) is a 172-unit family property located in Douglasville, Georgia. Historically, the property has struggled in this highly competitive market. The operating general partner responded with move-in specials and increased advertising with local businesses and rental guides. As a result, occupancy has significantly improved, but expenses remain high, and operations were just below breakeven in 2007. At the end of the second quarter of 2008, the operating general partner interest was transferred. As part of the transfer, the new operating general partner agreed to extend the operating deficit guarantee, which had previously expired due to the cap, for a period of three years. For 2008, the property operated significantly below breakeven due largely to a 40% increase in utilities, specifically associated with higher water rates. Average occupancy was 95%. Deficits were funded largely by operating general partner advances along with accruing of management fees. The investment general partner found the property to be in excellent condition upon a site inspection in April of 2009.
Through the third quarter of 2009, the property operated below breakeven primarily due to high water and sewer expenses, common area electricity costs, unexpected pool repairs and additional advertising expenses. In mid-July, the site manager resigned and took a number of residents with her to a new property. Consequently, occupancy dropped to 79%. At the end of the third quarter, occupancy increased to 81%. A new site manager was hired at the end of July. The new site manager has incorporated pizza box marketing in conjunction with Domino's, where once a week residents and local community members can buy fresh pizzas on the property for $5. The new site manager's main focus is on creating resident retention initiatives such as after school programs. Currently, occupancy is low due to recent gang activity occurring on or around the property. The operating general partner requested from the Department of Community Affairs the construction of a police substation in one of the three community rooms. The police substation would serve as a single room field facility. The substation would be financed by the county and would not affect the property's operating costs. The Department is expected to make a decision by the first quarter of 2010. The operating general partner anticipates an increase in deficit funding for the remainder of the year.
On March 3, 2009, the new operating general partner issued a statement to the investment general partner informing of a management change effective May 1, 2009. On June 20, 2008, the original operating general partner sold its interest in the Operating Partnership. The original operating general partner agreed to continue to manage the portfolio after the transaction, with the mutual understanding that they wanted to exit the property management business at some point in the near future. As the Atlanta rental market became increasingly more challenging towards the second half of 2008, it was agreed that the original operating partner would relinquish their management responsibilities, effective May 1, 2009. The new operating general partner believes that the new management will fit the role seamlessly as they have extensive tax credit industry experience. As of May 1, 2009, the investment general partner has reviewed and approved the management change. As of September 30, 2009, the mortgage, taxes and insurance payments are all current.
Jeffries Associates, LP (New River Gardens Apartments) is a 48-unit property located in Radford, VA. The property had a steady decline in occupancy throughout 2008. Occupancy declined from 90% in July 2008 to 75% at year-end 2008. Occupancy has improved slightly in 2009, with an 84% average for the year and an 86% average in the third quarter. The property has no rental assistance, which contributes significantly to the difficulty in leasing vacant units. The operating expenses decreased 8.6% from the previous year, but due to a lack of rental income, the property operated slightly below breakeven for the year. In an attempt to boost occupancy, management is continuing to advertise in the local and regional newspaper. They have also advertised in local flyers and invested in additional signage now posted along the adjacent streets, as well as becoming listed in the Renter's Guide Book. They have also recently called all local HUD offices and local social service organizations to keep them aware that there are apartments available. Management has begun to offer a discount on prorated rent for people who move in during the month, in an effort to fill vacancies quicker. Unfortunately the area has been extremely affected by the economic downturn, and the companies remaining in the area have begun to lay off workers or shut down completely. Management completed a telephone survey of the surrounding housing and found that most properties in the area are experiencing occupancy issues as well.
West Swanzey Affordable Housing Associates (Riverbend Apartments) is a 24-unit family development located in West Swanzey, NH. Despite strong occupancy, the property operated below breakeven in 2008 due to a large increase in operating expenses; specifically, maintenance expenses and real estate taxes. A new property manager was assigned to the property in March 2008. Upon takeover, the new manager inspected all of the units, which resulted in several evictions as a result of illegal live-ins and/or poor condition of the units. The new manager inspects units more frequently to avoid unanticipated high turnover costs. Management does not anticipate any further issues with tenants, but the turnover costs were high for the evicted units in 2008. The property also experienced two sewage pump failures in 2008, which required extensive work and contributed to the high operating expenses. Property taxes in the area increased significantly in 2008. The tax rate and the building's assessed valuation both increased in 2008. The operating general partner had the property re-assessed and expects a lower real estate tax bill in 2009. Occupancy continues to be strong with a 94% average through the third quarter of 2009; however, the property continues to operate below breakeven due to high operating expenses. All tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are current.
Series 31
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 26 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 31 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(794,266) and $(527,490), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,546,932 and $1,554,659, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Canton Housing One, LP (Madison Heights Apartments) is an 80-unit property located in Canton, Mississippi. In 2008, the property was unable to breakeven due to low occupancy. Occupancy averaged 74% in 2008 and remained sluggish at 75% during the third quarter of 2009. The property continues to experience increased turnover primarily due to evictions for non-payment of rent and skips. In addition, there were several gang-related incidents on or near the property. Management hired a police officer to patrol the site and is working with the local police department for extra patrols and support. These actions appear to be working. Recently, the utility deposit was increased to $300 from $185 by the City of Canton. Several applicants are delayed moving in until they have enough money saved to pay for the utility deposit. Management has taken several measures in its effort to increase occupancy. Advertisements have been placed in the local newspapers, and management is offering move-in rental concessions. Furthermore, arrangements were made to employ a full-time manager on the site, and extra personnel have been hired to prepare vacant units for occupancy. Current occupancy levels are insufficient to support breakeven operation at the current operating expense level. Management continues to focus its efforts on increasing occupancy as well as controlling operating expenses in an effort to bring operations back above breakeven status.
Riverbend Housing Associates, LP (Riverbend Estates) is a 28-unit development located in Biddeford, ME. The property operated below breakeven in 2008 due to low occupancy, high bad debt and increased operating expenses. Occupancy dropped below 90% in July 2008 and averaged 86% through the third and fourth quarters. The property continues to struggle with occupancy in 2009. The property had several move-outs and evictions while continuing to face competition from a number of housing options available in the area. There are homes available for rent in the surrounding area at comparable rents. Management has increased advertising efforts which include on-line sources such as Craigslist and Uncle Henry's Swap & Trade, which both offer free searchable classified ads, as well as advertisements in local newspapers. Management has also implemented a $200 resident referral bonus. The advertising efforts have generated rental inquiries at the property; however, the applicants have met only the 40% requirement and the property had only 60% units available. The district manager spoke with Maine State Housing Authority regarding renting three of the long-term vacant 60% units at the 40% rent level. The Maine State Housing Authority approved the request in the first quarter of 2009. With with approval, management was able to rent several additional units and occupancy increased from an 82% average in the first quarter of 2009 to an 88% average in the second quarter. Occupancy has further improved with a 96% average in the third quarter. Bad debt was high at the property in 2008. The on-site manager was not being aggressive enough with rent collection. In addition, the manager had a relationship with two tenants who became unemployed. Due to the manager's relationship with the tenants, he allowed them to stay after they had stopped paying rent. The manager was removed from the property in the third quarter of 2009, and the district manager has implemented a policy throughout the entire portfolio where any tenants that have not paid rent by the 16th of the month will automatically receive a "7 Day Notice to Quit." With this new policy, bad debt has stabilized in 2009. Administrative expenses were high in 2008 because the company that management uses for credit/background checks had been charging the property incorrectly. The issue has been corrected, but the property was charged for several 2007 amounts in 2008. Maintenance expenses were high in 2008 due to bed bug treatment required at the property. The treatment was completed in 2008. As a result of low occupancy in the first and second quarters, the property is operating below breakeven year-to-date. However, management does not anticipate any additional operational issues at this time, and the property is expected to operate above breakeven in upcoming quarters with improved occupancy. All tax, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The operating general partner is responsible for funding operating deficits, capped at $300,000, through the end of tax credit compliance period.
Level Creek Partners, L.P (Plantation Ridge) is a 218-unit (130 LIHTC units) family property located in Sugar Hill, GA. Due to weak and declining economic conditions throughout 2008, many employers closed or significantly reduced employee hours. As a result of hourly-wage employment composing a large portion of the property's tenant base, the number of move-outs and evictions increased. In the first quarter of 2009, occupancy reached 77%, declining from a previous 2008 annual average of 88%. Due to the property's location in an isolated neighborhood, traffic has been limited; however, management has been aggressively marketing the community. The manager has been targeting the Hispanic community, with print ads in the Hispanic newspaper, and by hiring a bi-lingual assistant manager in June. Two billboards on a heavily- traveled highway have also been rented (one facing north-bound and the other south-bound) to capture commuter traffic. Finally, management has implemented rental concessions. By the end of the third quarter, occupancy improved to 94%, and is expected to remain stable going forward. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations to ensure operations have stabilized. The mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are current.
Series 32
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 16 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 32 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(733,768) and $(802,018), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,222,298 and $1,292,410, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
FFLM Associates is an Operating Partnership that owns three limited partner interests, one of which is Carriage Pointe Investors, LP. Carriage Pointe Investors LP (Carriage Pointe Apartments) is an 18-unit property for seniors located in Old Bridge, New Jersey. Historically this property has operated with a cash flow deficit and does not fund a replacement reserve account. Capital expenses are funded from the operations. In 2008, occupancy averaged 99%, but the property operated below breakeven due to high debt service and real estate taxes. The property's debt service represents about 50% of its total income. The investment general partner conducted a site visit in September 2008. The property was in good condition. Management reports that rent collection has improved and maintenance expenses have decreased throughout the year. Average occupancy through the third quarter of 2009 was 100%, but the property continues to operate below breakeven. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits. The mortgage, taxes, insurance and payables are current.
In July 2009, the investment general partner of Series 32 and Series 33, respectively, transferred its interest in FFLM Associates - Woodhaven at South Brunswick to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,705,250 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $3,750 and $3,750 to Series 32 and Series 33, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $7,500 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. No proceeds will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 32 and Series 33, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
Indiana Development, LP (Clear Creek Apartments) is a 64-unit development, located in North Manchester, Indiana. During the 2005-2007 period the property operated below breakeven as a result of low occupancy (79% in 2006 and 86% in 2007). Cash deficits were ($53,329), ($39,990) and ($5,196) for the years 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. Prior to 2008, the operating general partner, who does not have an affiliated management company, engaged five different management companies. Finally, in early 2008 in connection with a portfolio-wide debt restructuring, the current third party management company was engaged. This management company appears much stronger than any of the previous management firms. Occupancy improved to 92% in 2008 and 93% through the third quarter of 2009. The property continues to operate slightly below breakeven due to bad debt and turn-over expense. Although the quality of the tenant base and rent collections have improved in 2009, maintenance expense due to unit turnovers has been high, concessions are being offered, and rental rates have decreased slightly in an effort to increase traffic. Occupancy reached a high of 100% in July 2009 and averaged 98% for the third quarter of 2009. To date, the operating general partner has funded all operating deficits, although its unlimited operating deficit guarantee expired in September 2004. The mortgage and taxes are current.
Martinsville I Limited (Martinsville Apartments) is a 13-unit project located in Shelbyville, KY. Occupancy averaged 85% in 2007. This property is located in a high crime neighborhood that is known to have drug activity. In October 2007 a resident filed a complaint with the Kentucky Housing Agency regarding safety concerns in and around the site. As a result, the Kentucky Housing Agency began granting residents the option to break leases and transfer to other properties. In addition, the Agency did not approve a subsidy for new residents. The investment general partner worked with the operating general partner to address the safety concerns by exploring a number of security initiatives to implement. These initiatives include a neighborhood block watch program, improved communications between the property staff and local police officials, adding security cameras to the exterior, and increased security lighting. A petition was sent to the Mayor, Governor, and other officials to increase crime control in the neighborhood. In order to pay for increased security, the operating general partner requested a rent increase and renewal of Section 8 subsidies. A modest rent increase was approved. However, the Kentucky Housing Agency was unable to guarantee Section 8 payments, as the Agency is legally obligated to allow residents with Section 8 vouchers to leave the property if they do not feel safe. The operating general partner was not willing to fund any additional money for this site.
Since the operating general partner and the Kentucky Housing Agency exhibited little commitment to improving the property, the investment general partner made the decision to allow this property to go into foreclosure. The investment general partner made a payment to the accountants in order to receive the 2007 tax returns. The investment general partner received a default notice on April 8, 2008. Through the second quarter, occupancy averaged 67%. In July 2008, the investment general partner was notified that all residents had moved out of the complex. The foreclosure and sale occurred on August 22, 2008.
As a result of the foreclosure, the Operating Partnership experienced a $203,718 loss of credits and recapture and interest of $236,009. This represents lost credits and recapture and interest of $42 and $49, respectively, per 1,000 BACs. The investment general partner intends to pursue the guarantors under the guaranty with a view to recovering the investment limited partner's losses. The guarantors' financial strength and likelihood of recovery are unknown at this time. In addition, an impairment loss in the amount of $119,470 was recorded to reduce the investment balance to zero, as of September 30, 2008.
Parkside Plaza, L.P. (Parkside Plaza Apartments) is a 39-unit co-op property located in Harlem, New York. The property operated below breakeven in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 due to high utility, maintenance and administrative expenses combined with collection loss. Management is exploring options to reduce utility costs, including tenant education on conservation and possible grant funding from non-profit agencies to conserve energy. A rent increase of 2% was effective January 1, 2009 and the operating general partner was recently granted an approval of a special increase request for the maximum amount allowable of 10% from the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal , or DHCR, effective June 1, 2009. Additional rent increases are planned for 2010 and 2011. Management is working to reduce tenant delinquencies by aggressively filing late notices and pursuing evictions through the housing court. Collections remain an ongoing and serious issue. Physical occupancy was 100% as of September 2009. The investment general partner continues to work with the operating general partner to improve operations. In January 2009, the investment general partner demanded that the operating general partner bring the mortgage current. The operating general partner received approval from the Lender and DHCR for release of operating reserve funds to bring the mortgage current. The investment general partner met with the operating general partner and management and completed a site inspection during the second quarter of 2009. The site visit revealed that the property was in very good condition. Insurance payments are current and the operating general partner has funded deficits, but not at the levels required. The operating general partner stated that there are funds accessible for future deficit funding as needed. Management indicated that the main area of concern ia high accounts payable which are predicated upon high accounts receivable. The tenant delinquency report and rent roll indicate that a significant portion of the accounts receivable are attributable to tenants who have inhabited the property for more than 10 years. To help combat increases in tenant receivables management is implementing the following measures: a stricter tenant screening process, a change in legal counsel for tenant court, and an analysis of "tenant hold over" (court process, with hope of rent collection) versus "tenant non-payment" (eviction with no hope of rent collection). General legal proceedings take at least six months before a tenant will have to appear in rent court in front of a judge. History shows that legal decisions in New York City involving low-income housing tend to rule in favor of the tenant. The mortgage and insurance are current.
Series 33
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 10 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 33 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(341,651) and $(246,101), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $587,231 and $594,949, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
FFLM Associates is an Operating Partnership that owns three limited partner interests, one of which is Carriage Pointe Investors, LP. Carriage Pointe Investors LP (Carriage Pointe Apartments) is an 18-unit property for seniors located in Old Bridge, New Jersey. Historically this property has operated with a cash flow deficit and does not fund a replacement reserve account. Capital expenses are funded from the operations. In 2008, occupancy averaged 99%, but the property operated below breakeven due to high debt service and real estate taxes. The property's debt service represents about 50% of its total income. The investment general partner conducted a site visit in September 2008. The property was in good condition. Management reports that rent collection has improved and maintenance expenses have decreased throughout the year. Average occupancy through the third quarter of 2009 was 100%, but the property continues to operate below breakeven. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits. The mortgage, taxes, insurance and payables are current.
In July 2009, the investment general partner of Series 32 and Series 33, respectively, transferred its interest in FFLM Associates - Woodhaven at South Brunswick to an entity affiliated with the operating general partner for its assumption of the outstanding mortgage balance of approximately $2,705,250 and cash proceeds to the investment partnerships of $3,750 and $3,750 to Series 32 and Series 33, respectively. Of the total proceeds received, $7,500 will be paid to BCAMLP for expenses related to the transfer, which includes third party legal costs. No proceeds will be returned to cash reserves held by Series 32 and Series 33, respectively. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the transfer of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
Bradford Group Partners of Jefferson County, LP (Bradford Square North Apartments) is a 50-unit senior property located in Jefferson City, Tennessee. In 2008, occupancy averaged 93%, but increased operating expenses caused the property to operate below breakeven. Specifically, administrative and maintenance expenses increased over 30% from the previous year's results. Although occupancy has declined to 80% in the third quarter of 2009, significant reductions in administrative and maintenance expenses have allowed the property to return to breakeven operations. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits as needed. The mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and accounts payables are all current.
Merchants Court, LLLP (Merchants Court Apartments) is a 192-unit property located in Dallas, GA. In 2008, the property operated below breakeven. Operations were hurt by an increase in administrative expenses, taxes and bad debt. The accounts payable was also high at the end of 2008. Through the third quarter of 2009 operations continued to decline. Operations have declined due to a decrease in occupancy, high administrative expenses, high taxes and a large increase in maintenance expenses. Occupancy decreased to 87% at the end of the third quarter, but is still averaging 90% for the year. Management has advised that the decline was due to job loss of some of the residents. Management has also advised that they have pre-leased five units and expect to stabilize occupancy in the 90's in the fourth quarter. The administrative expenses have shown improvements since 2008, but are still considered high. They are high due to increased advertising and the additional staff needed to help increase and stabilize occupancy at this property. The taxes continue to increase in the City of Dallas. Management has been unsuccessful in their discussions with the City to reduce the taxes. Maintenance expenses have increased due to high turnover, roof repairs, plumbing repairs, pool repairs and fire and safety updates. Many of these expenses are considered capital expenses and money from the replacement reserve will be used to pay these expenses. The operating general partner is currently researching which expenses actually qualify as capital expenses and will adjust the financials accordingly in the fourth quarter. The accounts payable balance is still high and the investment general partner will continue to discuss this issue with the operating general partner. The operating general partner has advanced money to help fund payables, but additional funds will be needed. The operating deficit guarantee has expired, but the operating general partner has a strong history of funding deficits. All taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Stearns Assisted Housing Associates, L.P. (Stearns Assisted Housing) is a 20-unit property in Millinocket, ME that provides housing to seniors. In 2006, occupancy averaged 90% and the property operated below breakeven due to high operating expenses. The property continued to operate below breakeven in 2007 due to vacancy loss and high utility expenses. Management believes occupancy declined due to the lack of vouchers in the Millinocket area. Management addressed this issue with the local housing agency and with the Maine State Housing Authority, or MSHA, which put pressure on the local housing agency to expedite the processing of all necessary paperwork in order to release additional vouchers. These measures increased occupancy at the property in the second quarter of 2007 and strong occupancy was maintained reaching 90% at year-end 2007. Occupancy improved to a 92% average in 2008. Occupancy continues to be strong with a 96% average through the third quarter of 2009.
Despite improvements in operations and occupancy, Stearns Assisted Housing Associates continues to operate at a deficit due to fuel costs resulting from an inefficient heating system. In an effort to reduce operating expenses, management allowed the Maine Public Utilities Commission to conduct a walk-through energy audit at the property. Recommendations were made to increase energy efficiency at the property. The recommendations were broken down into two categories: low cost do-it-yourself operations or maintenance procedures, and capital improvement projects. Management implemented the low cost operations and maintenance procedure recommendations, including weather-stripping, adding caulking around doors and windows, and shutting down the ventilation system during unoccupied times. Per the energy audit, the main problem is that too much of the building is heated but not occupied due to inefficient use of space. The commission recommended that the heating system be rezoned and an energy management system that sets back the temperature in areas when they become unoccupied should be installed. The operating general partner researched many alternative energy systems and concluded that Chip-Tech, which is a heating system which uses wood chips, and even garbage (under EPA standards) rather than oil to produce heat, would substantially reduce the heating costs at the property. Chip-tech toured the property in May 2008 and felt the property would be an ideal candidate for its technology. The operating general partner visited the investment general partner in October 2008 to discuss the energy alternatives he is researching throughout his portfolio including Stearns Assisted. Any proposals must be approved by HUD, MSHA, and the investment limited partners. The operating general partner submitted a loan application to Maine State Housing Authority in December 2008 to implement the Chip-Tech system. The proposal passed the "technical merit" portion of the approval process in the first quarter of 2009; however, MSHA would not provide financial approval because the property cannot support the amount of additional debt which would be required to implement any major changes at the property. At the request of MSHA, the investment general partner attended a meeting in September 2009 to discuss the issues at Stearns Assisted and the options available to improve operations at the property. Since Stearns Assisted cannot support the amount of additional debt required for major changes, at the September meeting, Maine Housing agreed to research financing options which would help the property implement less expensive improvements such as weatherization and other energy saving components.
Prior to exploring or recommending any financing options, Maine Housing requested a letter from the investment general partner stating BCCC, Inc., the special limited partner, is in support of the concept of exploring financing options to assist in the implementation of energy improvements at Stearns Assisted Housing Associates. The investment general partner provided the letter of support to MSHA and the operating general partner in September 2009. The operating general partner is expecting a decision on the financing options from MSHA in the fourth quarter of 2009. If approved, MSHA provides 100% financing up to 30 years at a fixed rate of 4.75%. Any proposals from MSHA would also require approval from the investment general partner and HUD. The operating general partner is hopeful that the energy saving components will be implemented for a portion of the 2009/2010 winter season. The operating general partner's operating deficit guaranty is unlimited in time and amount and he continues to fund cash deficits as necessary. All tax and insurance payments are current, and there is no hard debt associated with the property's financing.
Series 34
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 14 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 34 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(497,090) and $(597,076), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,075,667 and $1,124,672, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Hwy 18 Partners, LP (Summer Park) is a 104-unit property located in Jackson, MS. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property continues to operate above breakeven with the help of the low floating rate on the bond financing combined with management's efforts to lower expenses. As of September 30, 2009, the property was 85% occupied. The decline in occupancy at the end of 2008 and through the third quarter of 2009 is due to the opening of a new 375-unit single-family home development near the property in 2008 and management turnover. The homes are part of an affordable home ownership program, and the monthly mortgage payments are comparable to Summer Park's monthly rental rates. The lease-up started in 2008 and concluded in the second quarter of 2009. The property has also suffered from management turnover. In July, the property manager left the site and the management company had to hire a new property manager in the beginning of August. To increase occupancy management is conducting daily outreach to local businesses and churches to increase traffic. To help retain residents, management has increased activities at the site. They feel by creating more of a community feel at the property, they will be able to retain more residents. The management company has also advised that they are in the process of hiring a second regional property manager for the Jackson, MS market. They feel that the Jackson market is a difficult market and having a second regional property manager will provide the proper oversight and attention to help improve occupancy and overall operations. The investment general partner visited the property in October of 2009 to conduct a physical evaluation of the property and assess management. Any operating deficits through the compliance period are guaranteed by the operating general partner's operating deficit guaranty until the Operating Partnership converts to a fixed rate permanent financing. All taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are current.
Merchants Court, LLLP (Merchants Court Apartments) is a 192-unit property located in Dallas, GA. In 2008, the property operated below breakeven. Operations were hurt by an increase in administrative expenses, taxes and bad debt. The accounts payable was also high at the end of 2008. Through the third quarter of 2009 operations continued to decline. Operations have declined due to a decrease in occupancy, high administrative expenses, high taxes and a large increase in maintenance expenses. Occupancy decreased to 87% at the end of the third quarter, but is still averaging 90% for the year. Management has advised that the decline was due to job loss of some of the residents. Management has also advised that they have pre-leased five units and expect to stabilize occupancy in the 90's in the fourth quarter. The administrative expenses have shown improvements since 2008, but are still considered high. They are high due to increased advertising and the additional staff needed to help increase and stabilize occupancy at this property. The taxes continue to increase in the City of Dallas. Management has been unsuccessful in their discussions with the City to reduce the taxes. Maintenance expenses have increased due to high turnover, roof repairs, plumbing repairs, pool repairs and fire and safety updates. Many of these expenses are considered capital expenses and money from the replacement reserve will be used to pay these expenses. The operating general partner is currently researching which expenses actually qualify as capital expenses and will adjust the financials accordingly in the fourth quarter. The accounts payable balance is still high and the investment general partner will continue to discuss this issue with the operating general partner. The operating general partner has advanced money to help fund payables, but additional funds will be needed. The operating deficit guarantee has expired, but the operating general partner has a strong history of funding deficits. All taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
RHP 96-I, LP (Hillside Club I Apartments) is a 56-unit property located in Petosky, Michigan. Hillside Club operated below breakeven in the 2005-2007 period as a result of low occupancy. Occupancy averaged 81% for the years 2005, 2006, and 2007, and the property suffered cash losses of ($50,619), ($71,828) and ($66,013) in those years, respectively. Prior to 2008, the operating general partner, who does not have an affiliated management company, engaged five management companies. In early 2008, in connection with a portfolio wide restructing, the current third party management was engaged. This management company appears much stronger than any of the past management firms, and the property operated above breakeven through the third quarter of 2009 due to an increase in occupancy over the prior year, and an overall reduction in operating expenses which can be attributed to management's more restrained approach to spending. Occupancy in the first quarter 2009 averaged 91% but dropped to 86% in June 2009 due to a number of evictions for non-payment of rent. However, occupancy bounced back in the third quarter 2009 with a high of 93% in September. Management anticipates approximately four more evictions in the fourth quarter 2009 as it continues to enforce strict rent payment policies. Management is currently offering a reduced security deposit and eliminated the application fee, and has increased marketing through radio advertisements and flier inserts in the local newspaper. There are currently three applications in process which should counterbalance the vacancy loss due to evictions.
The operating general partner's unlimited operating deficit guarantee expired as of July 31, 2003. The operating general partner continued to fund deficits through the third quarter of 2006, but ceased to fully support the property's operations in the fourth quarter of 2006. As a result, the Operating Partnership fell into arrears on both its tax and mortgage payments. At the end of the third quarter of 2009, the Operating Partnership continues to remain three months delinquent on its mortgage, and although the 2007 real estate taxes were recently paid in the second quarter 2009, the 2008 real estate tax payment remained outstanding. To date, the lender has not declared the loan in default and the operating general partner has agreed to make the loan current by January 1, 2010 or else the lender will proceed with the default. The investment general partner is exploring alternatives, which include a workout plan with the existing operating general partner or the replacement of the operating general partner.
Millwood Park, LP (Millwood Park Apartments) is a 172-unit family property located in Douglasville, Georgia. Historically, the property has struggled in this highly competitive market. The operating general partner responded with move-in specials and increased advertising with local businesses and rental guides. As a result, occupancy has significantly improved, but expenses remain high, and operations were just below breakeven in 2007. At the end of the second quarter of 2008, the operating general partner interest was transferred. As part of the transfer, the new operating general partner agreed to extend the operating deficit guarantee, which had previously expired due to the cap, for a period of three years. For 2008, the property operated significantly below breakeven due largely to a 40% increase in utilities, specifically associated with higher water rates. Average occupancy was 95%. Deficits were funded largely by operating general partner advances along with accruing of management fees. The investment general partner found the property to be in excellent condition upon a site inspection in April of 2009.
Through the third quarter of 2009, the property operated below breakeven primarily due to high water and sewer expenses, common area electricity costs, unexpected pool repairs and additional advertising expenses. In mid-July, the site manager resigned and took a number of residents with her to a new property. Consequently, occupancy dropped to 79%. At the end of the third quarter, occupancy increased to 81%. A new site manager was hired at the end of July. The new site manager has incorporated pizza box marketing in conjunction with Domino's, where once a week residents and local community members can buy fresh pizzas on the property for $5. The new site manager's main focus is on creating resident retention initiatives such as after school programs. Currently, occupancy is low due to recent gang activity occurring on or around the property. The operating general partner requested from the Department of Community Affairs the construction of a police substation in one of the three community rooms. The police substation would serve as a single room field facility. The substation would be financed by the county and would not affect the property's operating costs. The Department is expected to make a decision by the first quarter of 2010. The operating general partner anticipates an increase in deficit funding for the remainder of the year.
On March 3, 2009, the new operating general partner issued a statement to the investment general partner informing of a management change effective May 1, 2009. On June 20, 2008, the original operating general partner sold its interest in the Operating Partnership. The original operating general partner agreed to continue to manage the portfolio after the transaction, with the mutual understanding that they wanted to exit the property management business at some point in the near future. As the Atlanta rental market became increasingly more challenging towards the second half of 2008, it was agreed that the original operating partner would relinquish their management responsibilities, effective May 1, 2009. The new operating general partner believes that the new management will fit the role seamlessly as they have extensive tax credit industry experience. As of May 1, 2009, the investment general partner has reviewed and approved the management change. As of September 30, 2009, the mortgage, taxes and insurance payments are all current.
Series 35
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 11 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 35 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(462,227) and $(530,676), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $777,174 and $917,671, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
The investment general partner met with the operating general partner and visited this site in September 2009. The property was very well maintained and the tax credit files were in very good order. Several capital improvement projects are planned over the next year or two: replacement of rotted wood frames, re-finishing the swimming pool, exterior siding repairs and painting. These improvement projects will be funded from replacement reserves and the operating general partner advances. Real estate tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current. The operating general partner's guarantee remains unlimited until rental achievement. Rental achievement has not yet been met. After rental achievement, the operating deficit guarantee is unlimited for three years. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed.
Mulvane Housing Associates Limited Partnership (Country Walk Apartments) is a 68-unit family property located in Mulvane, Kansas. In 2008, the property operated with an average occupancy of 91% and below breakeven status due to vacancy loss sustained in July through October as well as increased administrative and maintenance expenses. The property operated above breakeven through the third quarter of 2009 as expense levels have decreased. As of September 30, 2009, the property was 90% occupied. Management has reduced unnecessary staffing hours in an effort to decrease the property's payroll expense. Now that the property has occupancy in the ninety percent range, management assessed the local market area and determined that a rent increase is feasible. Management implemented a rent increase in the beginning of the third quarter in the amount of $10 per unit, which increases gross potential rent by approximately $8,160/annum. The operating general partner has continued to fund all operating deficits despite an expired guarantee and has stated that he will continue to do so until the end of the tax credit compliance period in 2014. All real estate taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
New Caney Housing II, LP (Garden Gates Apartments) is a 32-unit family property located in New Caney, TX. The property operated slightly below breakeven in 2008, due to an average occupancy of 88%. The property struggles with low occupancy due to soft market conditions. Low occupancy has continued to be an issue at this property because of the increased competition in the primary market area. Management did not adapt their marketing plans to address the increased competition quickly enough. In addition, the regional manager has stated that the market area offers a limited number of eligible prospects because the maximum income limits used to qualify residents are too low. The management team has been working diligently to rebuild the tenant base and revamp their outreach program. They focused on strengthening the resident base, increasing resident retention and improving collections. In order to increase resident retention and overall occupancy, the company implemented an in-depth tenant screening process. Management took steps to aggressively enforce lease provisions by either moving for eviction or not renewing leases for residents who violated the terms outlined in their rental agreement. Management has also added concessions and other incentives to improve occupancy. As of September 30, 2009, the property was 90% occupied and 91% leased. Management reports that the resident profile and resident retention have both greatly improved. The investment general partner met with the operating general partner and visited this site in October 2008. The property was very well maintained and there are no tax credit compliance issues to address. The property continued to operate below breakeven through the third quarter of 2009 due to leasing concessions and an annual payment of property insurance, which was made in January and an annual payment of real estate taxes, which was made in May. The mortgage, taxes and insurance are all current. The management company is deferring all fees until operations improve. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the property's occupancy and operations.
Series 36
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 11 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 36 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(223,954) and $(242,733), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $535,526 and $481,713, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Aloha Housing Limited Partnership (Farmington Meadows Apartments) is a 69-unit apartment complex located in Aloha, OR, with project-based Section 8 subsidy on 100% of the units. Historically, the property has had strong operations. Average occupancy for the first three quarters of 2009 was 96%. Management took several units off-line for repairs in June 2008, causing occupancy to drop to 90% by the end of the fourth quarter of 2008. The property requires very high occupancy ranging from 97% to 98% to maintain operations above breakeven, due to its high debt service; so the drop in occupancy resulted in below breakeven operations. A number of other issues have also affected cash flow, resulting in several late payments on the mortgage.
The property's balconies deteriorated significantly from 2006 to 2008. While awaiting contractors' bids to repair the balconies, management issued letters directing residents not to use their balconies until they were repaired. Despite the letters, one resident continued to use her balcony and sprained her ankle when the balcony collapsed in August 2008. The incident was reported to both parties' insurance companies, but the resident has taken no legal action. After the incident, all doors to the balconies were boarded up immediately. Work to remediate the balconies was completed in the first quarter of 2009.
Due to constrained funds, the property has alternated between paying vendors and meeting its debt service. After the sewer line was repaired in July 2008 for $60,000, the contractor who performed the work filed a lien on the property. Payment has since been made, but this caused some arrearage in the mortgage payments. The operating general partner brought the mortgage current, but payables began to build again. In order pay down some of these payables, the Operating Partnership missed two mortgage payments in 2009. The mortgage payments were brought current and have remained current partially through a release of funds from the Operating Partnership's debt service reserve, but are again about two and one half months in arrears.
On July 21, 2008, the Operating Partnership was served with a lawsuit from a former resident alleging that her two children contracted asthma as a result of mold in two units in which they had lived. The lawsuit claimed damages in the amount of $200,000. The operating general partner worked with the Operating Partnership's counsel and insurance carrier to reach a settlement for about $10,000 on this issue in April 2009, which was covered by the Operating Partnership's insurance.
In March 2008, the operating general partner replaced the management agent with a new one which appears to be skilled in all areas of Low Income Housing Tax Credit
property management and has been working to address all of the issues above, including performing mold remediation on all affected units. Management was able to delay the HUD site inspection, which allowed the Operating Partnership time to repair the balconies and remediate mold issues. As a result, the property passed the HUD inspection in July 2009. Some of the balcony repair costs were paid out of the property's replacement reserve. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the progress of each issue, including improving occupancy. The investment general partner continues to press the operating general partner to either continue funding deficits in a timelier manner or step out of the operating general partner role consensually. Although the debt payments have not yet been accelerated and foreclosure proceedings have not begun, if the operating general partner discontinues funding deficits, the property could face foreclosure in 2010. A foreclosure sale occurring in 2010 would require the Operating Partnership to recognize estimated tax credit recapture and penalty interest of approximately $443,925, equivalent to $206 per 1,000 BACs.Nowata Village Limited Partnership (Nowata Village) is a 28-unit family property located in Nowata, OK. Occupancy began to decline in the second quarter of 2008, ending the year with an average occupancy of 82% and below breakeven operations. However, the regional manager began spending more time onsite, marketing efforts improved and occupancy increased to 89% in December 2008. Occupancy has been stable in 2009, averaging 89% as of September 2009. The property is expected to reach breakeven status in 2009 if replacement reserve withdrawals are approved by Rural Development. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed. The property's mortgage, real estate taxes and insurance payments are all current.
Riverview Bend Limited Partnership (Riverview Bend) is a 94-unit property located in Crystal City, MO. On June 23, 2009 there was a fire at the property. Two units were a complete loss and four other units had significant damage. There were no injuries as a result of the fire. The rehab work to the six down units was delayed due to the long investigation time by the fire department and insurance carrier, management not agreeing with the original amount that the insurance company was willing to pay and having to renegotiate the amount to paid, and the time required to obtain the permits from the City. As of October 30, 2009, two of the units have been brought back online and the remaining units are scheduled to finish the rehab work the first week of December. The insurance, taxes and mortgage are all current for this deal.
Series 37
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 7 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 37 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(496,780) and $(638,204), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $801,538 and $769,583, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Hwy 18 Partners, LP (Summer Park) is a 104-unit property located in Jackson, MS. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property continues to operate above breakeven with the help of the low floating rate on the bond financing combined with management's efforts to lower expenses. As of September 30, 2009, the property was 85% occupied. The decline in occupancy at the end of 2008 and through the third quarter of 2009 is due to the opening of a new 375-unit single-family home development near the property in 2008 and management turnover. The homes are part of an affordable home ownership program, and the monthly mortgage payments are comparable to Summer Park's monthly rental rates. The lease-up started in 2008 and concluded in the second quarter of 2009. The property has also suffered from management turnover. In July, the property manager left the site and the management company had to hire a new property manager in the beginning of August. To increase occupancy management is conducting daily outreach to local businesses and churches to increase traffic. To help retain residents, management has increased activities at the site. They feel by creating more of a community feel at the property, they will be able to retain more residents. The management company has also advised that they are in the process of hiring a second regional property manager for the Jackson, MS market. They feel that the Jackson market is a difficult market and having a second regional property manager will provide the proper oversight and attention to help improve occupancy and overall operations. The investment general partner visited the property in October of 2009 to conduct a physical evaluation of the property and assess management. Any operating deficits through the compliance period are guaranteed by the operating general partner's operating deficit guaranty until the Operating Partnership converts to a fixed rate permanent financing. All taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are current.
Columbia Wood, LP (Columbia Wood Townhomes) is a 120-unit property located in Newnan, GA. Historically, occupancy has been a concern at this property due to economic decline in the area. The property maintained an average occupancy of 86% in 2008, with below breakeven operations. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy has averaged 85%, but has declined to 79% as of September 30, 2009. The primary reasons for below breakeven operations are high vacancy and bad debt. The lack of income has affected management's ability to pay bills, resulting in high payables. Furthermore, due to poor pre-screening standards on the part of management, tenant receivables continue to be an issue at the property. Management continues to try to improve occupancy as well as their collection efforts.
The investment general partner met with the operating general partner and visited this site in September 2009. The property was very well maintained and the tax credit files were in very good order. Several capital improvement projects are planned over the next year or two: replacement of rotted wood frames, re-finishing the swimming pool, exterior siding repairs and painting. These improvement projects will be funded from replacement reserves and the operating general partner advances. Real estate tax, insurance and mortgage payments are current. The operating general partner's guarantee remains unlimited until rental achievement. Rental achievement has not yet been met. After rental achievement, the operating deficit guarantee is unlimited for three years. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed.
Stearns Assisted Housing Associates, L.P. (Stearns Assisted Housing) is a 20-unit property in Millinocket, ME that provides housing to seniors. In 2006, occupancy averaged 90% and the property operated below breakeven due to high operating expenses. The property continued to operate below breakeven in 2007 due to vacancy loss and high utility expenses. Management believes occupancy declined due to the lack of vouchers in the Millinocket area. Management addressed this issue with the local housing agency and with the Maine State Housing Authority, or MSHA, which put pressure on the local housing agency to expedite the processing of all necessary paperwork in order to release additional vouchers. These measures increased occupancy at the property in the second quarter of 2007 and strong occupancy was maintained reaching 90% at year-end 2007. Occupancy improved to a 92% average in 2008. Occupancy continues to be strong with a 96% average through the third quarter of 2009.
Despite improvements in operations and occupancy, Stearns Assisted Housing Associates continues to operate at a deficit due to fuel costs resulting from an inefficient heating system. In an effort to reduce operating expenses, management allowed the Maine Public Utilities Commission to conduct a walk-through energy audit at the property. Recommendations were made to increase energy efficiency at the property. The recommendations were broken down into two categories: low cost do-it-yourself operations or maintenance procedures, and capital improvement projects. Management implemented the low cost operations and maintenance procedure recommendations, including weather-stripping, adding caulking around doors and windows, and shutting down the ventilation system during unoccupied times. Per the energy audit, the main problem is that too much of the building is heated but not occupied due to inefficient use of space. The commission recommended that the heating system be rezoned and an energy management system that sets back the temperature in areas when they become unoccupied should be installed. The operating general partner researched many alternative energy systems and concluded that Chip-Tech, which is a heating system which uses wood chips, and even garbage (under EPA standards) rather than oil to produce heat, would substantially reduce the heating costs at the property. Chip-tech toured the property in May 2008 and felt the property would be an ideal candidate for its technology. The operating general partner visited the investment general partner in October 2008 to discuss the energy alternatives he is researching throughout his portfolio including Stearns Assisted. Any proposals must be approved by HUD, MSHA, and the investment limited partners. The operating general partner submitted a loan application to Maine State Housing Authority in December 2008 to implement the Chip-Tech system. The proposal passed the "technical merit" portion of the approval process in the first quarter of 2009; however, MSHA would not provide financial approval because the property cannot support the amount of additional debt which would be required to implement any major changes at the property. At the request of MSHA, the investment general partner attended a meeting in September 2009 to discuss the issues at Stearns Assisted and the options available to improve operations at the property. Since Stearns Assisted cannot support the amount of additional debt required for major changes, at the September meeting, Maine Housing agreed to research financing options which would help the property implement less expensive improvements such as weatherization and other energy saving components.
Prior to exploring or recommending any financing options, Maine Housing requested a letter from the investment general partner stating BCCC, Inc., the special limited partner, is in support of the concept of exploring financing options to assist in the implementation of energy improvements at Stearns Assisted Housing Associates. The investment general partner provided the letter of support to MSHA and the operating general partner in September 2009. The operating general partner is expecting a decision on the financing options from MSHA in the fourth quarter of 2009. If approved, MSHA provides 100% financing up to 30 years at a fixed rate of 4.75%. Any proposals from MSHA would also require approval from the investment general partner and HUD. The operating general partner is hopeful that the energy saving components will be implemented for a portion of the 2009/2010 winter season. The operating general partner's operating deficit guaranty is unlimited in time and amount and he continues to fund cash deficits as necessary. All tax and insurance payments are current, and there is no hard debt associated with the property's financing.
Baldwin Villas Limited Partnership (Baldwin Villas) is a 65-unit property located in Pontiac, MI. The project consists of single family rental homes, with home ownership an option available to qualifying tenants. Because the cost to build the project approximated the cost for a single-family development, construction of the project required a significant amount of debt. As a result, the rent structure required to support the project is high, and most tenants need significant subsidy to afford the $1,000+/ per month rents.
During 2006, occupancy at Baldwin Villas averaged over 90% and the property generated $61,425 in cash. Due in part to the decreased availability of portable Section 8 vouchers caused by funding constraints, average occupancy declined in 2007 to 82% and the property operated below breakeven. In October 2007, the operating general partner engaged a new property management company to manage several of its properties, including Baldwin. The property continued to operate below breakeven in 2008. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy averaged 86%, although occupancy dropped to 83% in July. Operations continue to be below breakeven. Unemployment is high in Pontiac, a suburb of Detroit, and the local housing authority has stopped issuing vouchers due to funding cuts. Operating expenses remain well above state averages due to the fact that the property consists of single family homes. Maintenance expenses in 2008 were almost three times the state average, which is attributable to extremely costly unit turnovers, and maintenance expenses are projected to be even higher in 2009. Management began using a new credit agency for more comprehensive credit checks in August 2008 in an effort to curb unit turnovers and tenant receivables; however, evictions for non-payment of rent continue to be an issue. Additionally, the homes were built on slabs and settling has caused plumbing issues and shifting of some of the exterior walkways. Repairs are being made on an as-needed basis every other month. The site manager is working with the local housing authority to obtain voucher holder referrals, has held several open houses in the second quarter of 2009, has increased radio and newspaper advertisements, and is offering a free months rent to attract new tenants.
Reporting by the operating general partner has not been timely in the past. In the third quarter of 2008 the investment general partner received the 2007 draft audit which revealed that, in 2007, the operating general partner had renegotiated the loan agreement to defer 2007 principal payments. As a result, principal payments in 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 were deferred. The Operating Partnership remains current on the interest portion of its debt service. The operating general partner is currently in discussions with the lender/letter of credit issuer, trying to obtain an extension of the letter of credit. Long term solutions under discussion include marking the current debt to market, but discussions are at a very early stage. Real estate taxes remain unpaid, but the operating general partner did file an appeal in 2009 which is currently pending. Payables are high and continue to increase. Reporting appears to have improved in 2009, and the 2008 audited financial statement and the 2009 quarterly statements were delivered in a timely manner.
The investment general partner is closely monitoring the management company's ability to increase occupancy and cash flow, reduce unit turnovers, and control maintenance expenses and bad debt. The investment general partner continues to press the operating general partner for a plan to pay down unpaid real estate taxes and growing payables.
Series 38
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 10 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% qualified occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 38 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(303,286) and $(221,958), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $552,516 and $589,998, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Columbia Creek Apartments is a 172-unit family development located in Woodstock, GA. Average occupancy has steadily decreased from 85% in 2007 to 83% in 2008, and is averaging 74% through September 30, 2009. According to management, maintaining high occupancy has been difficult because of a declining market and lack of qualified residents due to job losses in the area. The operating general partner has reduced rental rates and is currently offering resident referral fees, merchant referral fees and giveaways as a means to improve occupancy. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property is operating below breakeven as a result of sustained low occupancy and bad debt. In addition, maintenance expenses have been high as a result of increased turnover costs. The investment general partner recently met with the operating general partner and visited the site in September 2009. The property is very well maintained, and shows nicely as a result of recent capital improvement projects (exterior painting and re-striping of the parking lot). In addition, all files were well kept and in good order. All real estate taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current. The investment general partner continues to hold bi-monthly conference calls with the operating general partner and management staff to review all operational issues at the property. These reviews will continue until occupancy and operations stabilize.
Series 39
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 9 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 39 reflects net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(359,558) and $(301,317), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $477,496 and $496,046, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year end results.
Arbors at Ironwood, LP (Arbors at Ironwood Apartments) is an 88-unit family development located in Mishawaka, IN. Although occupancy averaged 96% in 2008, operations fell below breakeven due to an increase in unexpected expenses. Vandalized units and water damage from a resident's washing machine attributed to the unexpected expenses. The 40% and 50% tax credit units have a difficult time competing in the market as single family home rentals and trailers rent for as low as $300 a month. Through the second quarter of 2009, occupancy averaged 95%, with operations just slightly above breakeven. Although occupancy decreased slightly to 91% at the end of the third quarter, operations remain above breakeven. All taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Columbia Creek Apartments is a 172-unit family development located in Woodstock, GA. Average occupancy has steadily decreased from 85% in 2007 to 83% in 2008, and is averaging 74% through September 30, 2009. According to management, maintaining high occupancy has been difficult because of a declining market and lack of qualified residents due to job losses in the area. The operating general partner has reduced rental rates and is currently offering resident referral fees, merchant referral fees and giveaways as a means to improve occupancy. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property is operating below breakeven as a result of sustained low occupancy and bad debt. In addition, maintenance expenses have been high as a result of increased turnover costs. The investment general partner recently met with the operating general partner and visited the site in September 2009. The property is very well maintained, and shows nicely as a result of recent capital improvement projects (exterior painting and re-striping of the parking lot). In addition, all files were well kept and in good order. All real estate taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current. The investment general partner continues to hold bi-monthly conference calls with the operating general partner and management staff to review all operational issues at the property. These reviews will continue until occupancy and operations stabilize.
Series 40
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 16 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 40 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(395,655) and $(352,416), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $610,644 and $642,942, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Baldwin Villas Limited Partnership (Baldwin Villas) is a 65-unit property located in Pontiac, MI. The project consists of single family rental homes, with home ownership an option available to qualifying tenants. Because the cost to build the project approximated the cost for a single-family development, construction of the project required a significant amount of debt. As a result, the rent structure required to support the project is high, and most tenants need significant subsidy to afford the $1,000+/ per month rents.
During 2006, occupancy at Baldwin Villas averaged over 90% and the property generated $61,425 in cash. Due in part to the decreased availability of portable Section 8 vouchers caused by funding constraints, average occupancy declined in 2007 to 82% and the property operated below breakeven. In October 2007, the operating general partner engaged a new property management company to manage several of its properties, including Baldwin. The property continued to operate below breakeven in 2008. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy averaged 86%, although occupancy dropped to 83% in July. Operations continue to be below breakeven. Unemployment is high in Pontiac, a suburb of Detroit, and the local housing authority has stopped issuing vouchers due to funding cuts. Operating expenses remain well above state averages due to the fact that the property consists of single family homes. Maintenance expenses in 2008 were almost three times the state average, which is attributable to extremely costly unit turnovers, and maintenance expenses are projected to be even higher in 2009. Management began using a new credit agency for more comprehensive credit checks in August 2008 in an effort to curb unit turnovers and tenant receivables; however, evictions for non-payment of rent continue to be an issue. Additionally, the homes were built on slabs and settling has caused plumbing issues and shifting of some of the exterior walkways. Repairs are being made on an as-needed basis every other month. The site manager is working with the local housing authority to obtain voucher holder referrals, has held several open houses in the second quarter of 2009, has increased radio and newspaper advertisements, and is offering a free months rent to attract new tenants.
Reporting by the operating general partner has not been timely in the past. In the third quarter of 2008 the investment general partner received the 2007 draft audit which revealed that, in 2007, the operating general partner had renegotiated the loan agreement to defer 2007 principal payments. As a result, principal payments in 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 were deferred. The Operating Partnership remains current on the interest portion of its debt service. The operating general partner is currently in discussions with the lender/letter of credit issuer, trying to obtain an extension of the letter of credit. Long term solutions under discussion include marking the current debt to market, but discussions are at a very early stage. Real estate taxes remain unpaid, but the operating general partner did file an appeal in 2009 (currently pending). Payables are high and continue to increase. Reporting appears to have improved in 2009, and the 2008 audited financial statement and the 2009 quarterly statements were delivered in a timely manner.
The investment general partner is closely monitoring the management company's ability to increase occupancy and cash flow, reduce unit turnovers, and control maintenance expenses and bad debt. The investment general partner continues to press the operating general partner for a plan to pay down unpaid real estate taxes and growing payables.
Arbors at Ironwood II, LP (Arbors at Ironwood Apartments II) is a 40-unit family development located in Mishawaka, IN. Although occupancy averaged 96% in 2008, operations fell below breakeven due to an increase in unexpected expenses. Vandalized units and an insurance deductible from a unit fire attributed to the unexpected expenses. The 40% and 50% tax credit units have a difficult time competing in the market as single family home rentals and trailers rent for as low as $300 a month. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy averaged 97%, and operations are approaching breakeven. All taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Series 41
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 21 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 41 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(405,855) and $(464,143), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $842,891 and $861,689, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
An affiliate of the investment general partner has funded emergency repairs to stabilize hillside soils and reinforce retaining walls. The work will continue on an as needed basis. The Operating Partnership has asserted in court that the retaining wall was not constructed properly and has filed suit against the retaining wall contractor and the original general contractor of the property, who was replaced before completion of construction. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the case was settled in mediation for $2,001,000. During the first quarter 2008, the Operating Partnership received $1,993,500 in damages. The Operating Partnership is in the process of reimbursing the affiliate of the investment general partner for the funds they have advanced for the repairs. The balance of the settlement, held in reserves, will be used to complete the necessary repairs and associated landscaping. The property operated above breakeven in 2007 and 2008 and continues to do so in 2009. The investment general partner continues to monitor the completion of the remaining construction work. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current.
Rural Housing Partners of Mt. Carroll, LP (Mill Creek Village), is a 12-unit family property located in Mt. Carroll, IL. In 2007, the property had an average occupancy of 74% and operated below breakeven. The market that the property is located in is a depressed rural area. In 2006, two of the units lost rental assistance from Rural Development, due to being vacant for at least six months. Since that time, the two units remained vacant until January 2009 due to an inability to find tenants who can afford the rents without Rural Development rental assistance. According to the operating general partner, there is little chance of re-attaining the lost rental assistance. In 2008, average occupancy was 83% and the property operated above breakeven due to expense savings. Through the first three quarters of 2009, average occupancy is 92%, and the property continues to operate above breakeven. The mortgage, property taxes, and insurance are current.
Madison Housing Associates II Limited Partnership (Southpark Apartments II) is 68-unit family property located in Mulvane, Kansas. In 2008 the property operated below breakeven due to vacancy loss sustained in July through October as well as increased administrative and maintenance expenses. Despite high occupancy, the property operated slightly below breakeven through the third quarter of 2009 due to high maintenance expenses. Maintenance expenses were high as a result of management having to make some major, un-planned capital improvements to the property. These improvements included carpet and vinyl replacement, roof repairs, and step replacement. These improvements and replacements will be funded in the fourth quarter of 2009 from the replacement reserve account. Maintenance expenses are expected to normalize in the fourth quarter of 2009, as management does not anticipate making any further major improvements to the property. As of September 30, 2009, the property was 95% occupied. To ensure above breakeven operations, management has implemented a property manager incentive program based upon occupancy and net operating income. This will motivate on-site management to reduce expenses and increase revenue. Since occupancy remains strong, and to further offset operating expenses, the investment general partner encouraged management to implement a rent increase. A rent increase was implemented on April 17, 2009 in the amount of $20 per unit, which increases gross potential rent by approximately $14,400 per annum. The operating general partner has continued to fund all operating deficits despite an expired guarantee. He has stated that he will continue to do so until the end of the tax credit compliance period in 2016. All real estate taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current.
Hawthorne Associates, LP (Sandalwood Apartments) is a 20-unit property located in Toppenish, Washington. The Operating Partnership operated above breakeven in 2006. However, the 2006 overall average occupancy of 84% declined to 65% in December 2006, due to inadequate site staffing, poor tenant rent collection, high eviction rates, and many over-income applicants. A new site staff was hired early in 2007 and the site manager was able to restore occupancy to 95% by September 2007. The property operated slightly below breakeven in 2007 but improved back to breakeven status in 2008. Average occupancy in 2008 was 90%. The occupancy as of September 30, 2009 was 95%, up from 85% as of the end of June of 2009. The property continues to operate above breakeven through the third quarter of 2009. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations on a monthly basis. The rent collection and eviction policies are being strictly enforced; no further collection issues are anticipated. The taxes, mortgage and insurance are all current.
Marwood Senior Apartments is a new construction property for the elderly located in Upper Marlboro, Maryland. On May 31, 2008, a hailstorm damaged roof shingles, gutters, and trim. The damage was not discovered until a roof leak appeared on January 9, 2009. The leaks were temporarily repaired, and management contacted three companies for estimates of the damage. It was determined that the roof needed to be replaced. Work commenced in the first quarter 2009, and was projected to be completed by the third quarter 2009. To date, the roof is nearly complete with minor details left to finalize. The first check was approved and executed by the investment general partner on June 5, 2009. The final insurance check is anticipated to be executed upon 100% completion of the project. The property has maintained 97% occupancy throughout 2009 and continues to operate above breakeven. All required reserves and escrows are fully funded. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the progress with the insurance claims and roof replacement until all work is completed and all funds are received from the insurance company.
Series 42
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 22 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 42 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(622,412) and $(447,902), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $882,105 and $928,371, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Wingfield Apartments Partnership II, A L.P. (Wingfield Apartments II) is a 42-unit multifamily development located in Kinder, Louisiana. During 2007, a $50 per unit rent increase was implemented for new move-ins or upon lease renewal. This caused occupancy to decline in 2007 from 99% to 87% because tenants could not afford the new rates. Occupancy rebounded during the fourth quarter of 2007 and into the first quarter of 2008. Throughout 2008, occupancy continued to decline ranging from a high of 90% in January to a low of 69% in December 2008. Overall, occupancy averaged 82% for 2008. Despite the low occupancy, the property operated above breakeven for the year due to reduced operating expenses. Occupancy increased to 93% at the end of the third quarter 2009. The operating deficit guarantee expired in 2005. The low income housing tax credit compliance period expires in 2016. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current.
San Diego/Fox Hollow, LP (Hollywood Palms Apts.) and its limited partner, BCP/Fox Hollow LLC filed a lawsuit against the former operating general partner and its affiliates for breaches of various agreements. In December of 2004, a judgment was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California (San Diego County) awarding the plaintiffs the amount of $3,507,426 plus post-judgment interest at an annual rate of 10%. The settlement included attorney's fees for the plaintiffs in the amount of $1,125,000 plus $123,697 in costs. The State Appeals Court upheld the judgment in the fourth quarter of 2006. The investment general partner has been pursuing payment, and on April 21, 2008, the deficiency was settled though mediation for a total of $3,950,000. The payment plan requires that cash payments of $1,650,000 be made within 200 days of settlement, and the remaining $2,300,000 be paid over time, secured by the defendant's interests in 8 real estate holdings. To date $1,300,000 has been collected.
An affiliate of the investment general partner has funded emergency repairs to stabilize hillside soils and reinforce retaining walls. The work will continue on an as needed basis. The Operating Partnership has asserted in court that the retaining wall was not constructed properly and has filed suit against the retaining wall contractor and the original general contractor of the property, who was replaced before completion of construction. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the case was settled in mediation for $2,001,000. During the first quarter 2008, the Operating Partnership received $1,993,500 in damages. The Operating Partnership is in the process of reimbursing the affiliate of the investment general partner for the funds they have advanced for the repairs. The balance of the settlement, held in reserves, will be used to complete the necessary repairs and associated landscaping. The property operated above breakeven in 2007, 2008 and continues to do so in 2009. The investment general partner continues to monitor the completion of the remaining construction work. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current.
Dorchester Court Apartments (Dorchester Court Limited Dividend Housing Association, LP) is a 131-unit apartment complex located in Port Huron, MI, with 75% of the units devoted to elderly housing. Due to construction delays and slow initial lease-up, the property experienced difficulty generating positive cash flow. One of the two original members of the operating general partner entity was unable to contribute his share of the advances required under the operating deficit guarantee. In July 2005, one of the original members was replaced and the new member was inserted as the second member of the operating general partner entity. Although the new second member did not assume the obligations of the guarantor, it had significant resources and contributed over $190,000 to the Operating Partnership to fund the property's operating deficits during the 2006-2007 periods. In 2008, however, growing tensions between the two current members resulted in less attention being paid to management of the property and diminished willingness of the operating general partner to fund deficits. In May 2009, the Operating Partnership approved the transfer of interests within the operating general partner entity; the new second member transferred its interest to the remaining single member. As noted above, the members had been at odds and the transfer was deemed likely to clarify control of the entity and result in improved performance of the property.
Occupancy averaged 90% for 2008 and the first three quarters of 2009. The property operated just below breakeven in 2008 and continues to operate below breakeven in 2009, due to low occupancy in the first four months of 2009; however, the property did operate above breakeven in the third quarter. In 2007, the Operating Partnership refinanced its first mortgage, resulting in a significant improvement in operations over 2006. Under the new debt service and assuming expenses are maintained in line with those of 2008, the property should be able to breakeven at 93% occupancy. As of September 2009, occupancy had risen to 92%. The operating general partner believes that with the change in the general partner entity noted above, occupancy will continue to rise, and in turn, operations will improve. Prior to the refinance, the operating general partner had not funded the replacement reserve account; however, the Operating Partnership has been funding the replacement reserve, in accordance with the loan and Operating Partnership agreements, since September 2007. The mortgage, taxes and insurance payments are all current. Accounts payable stood at $41,000 as of September 2009, down approximately $20,000 from June 2009.
HS Housing, LP (Helios Station Apartments) is a 30-unit family property located in Lafayette, CO. In response to below breakeven property operations caused by low occupancy in 2006, the management company replaced the site manager in the third quarter of 2006. This had a positive effect on the property during 2007, with occupancy increasing to 97% and the property operating above breakeven. The property operated above breakeven in 2008 with average occupancy of 94%. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property continued to operate above breakeven with 97% average occupancy year-to-date. All real estate taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The operating general partner's obligation to fund operating deficits is unlimited in time and amount. A site visit conducted in September 2008 revealed that although the property was in good physical condition, housekeeping and maintenance needed improvement. Additionally, the tenant file audit disclosed incomplete and disorganized files which could be attributed to the site manager's limited tax credit experience and knowledge of the program. A new, experienced site manager was hired at the end of October 2008 in an effort to address these issues; however, this manager was also not able to proactively tackle the property's issues and a new site manager began in the beginning of May. This manager has previous tax credit experience as an assistant manager and was promoted from a larger property with the idea that she will be able to deliver focus to this smaller property. Another site visit was conducted at the property in July 2009. Housekeeping and maintenance had improved, but tenant files continued to require attention. The site manager will work with a regional compliance manager to ensure that any file issues are corrected. A 100% recertification is scheduled to occur in October 2009. The management agent will also continue to have the site manager attend LIHTC training. Overall, the site manager has been proactive and is dedicated to making positive changes at the property.
Effective July 1, 2008, the operating general partner brought in a new management company to manage its entire portfolio of 18 properties in Colorado. The change in management was intended to address unsatisfactory operations at several properties in the Colorado portfolio. The operating general partner is attempting to recapitalize its Colorado portfolio, including HS Housing, but the plan's likelihood for success is uncertain at this time. However, improved management has resulted in increased cash flow across the entire portfolio. The investment general partner has turned its focus toward obtaining a commitment from the operating general partner to fund the portfolio's identified near term capital improvements and payables out of the improved cash flow from the entire portfolio. The operating general partner signed a letter agreeing to fund capital needs at the Colorado properties, and advanced funds to two properties in June. If the operating general partner fails to complete the capital plan to which it has committed, the investment general partner will consider replacing the operating general partner.
Audited financial statements show that operations were above breakeven in 2007 and 2008, and unaudited financial statements show that operations have remained above breakeven for the first three quarters of 2009. Tenant file issues have been addressed and corrected. The investment general partner will continue to monitor until the operating general partner completes the capital plan as agreed.
SM Housing, LP is a 40-unit property located in Buena Vista, Colorado. On September 7, 2008, there was a fire at the property caused by a resident smoking. There was physical damage to 12 of the 40 units and the residents had to seek temporary shelter until the rehab work was complete. On January 9, 2009, the property passed the final inspection for the rehab work and the Certificates of Occupancy have been issued. There was no loss of credits as a result of the down units. Due to the fire and $50,000 in costs that insurance would not cover, the property operated below breakeven in 2008. Insurance would not cover the costs to house residents while the rehab work was being complete, which totaled $50,000. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property has operated above breakeven and occupancy remains strong ending the third quarter 92% occupied. Management feels now that occupancy has increased back to historical levels, the property will operate above breakeven for the remainder of the year. The investment general partner has been advised that the contractor who did the rehab work has put a lien against the property. The original amount of the lien, placed on the property for unpaid work, was for $213,308. The operating general partner paid a portion of the outstanding amount owed to the contractor; therefore, the lien has been reduced to $60,000. In the third quarter, the operating general partner asserted that the insurance company should be responsible for paying the remaining $60,000 balance to the contractor. The operating general partner is currently in talks with the insurance company and the contractor to resolve this issue. The operating general partner anticipates this issue to be resolved by the end of the fourth quarter. The investment general partner will continue to monitor payment to the contractor to ensure the lien is released. All real estate tax, mortgage and insurance payments are current.
TS Housing, LP (Tiffany Square Apartments) is a 52-unit family property located just outside Denver in Lakewood, CO. Parts of the property developed structural issues related to the floor joists, which resulted in uneven floors and required extensive repairs. Ten units were off-line for over six months while management attempted to remediate the issue. As a result of lower revenue from the down units, and increased maintenance expenditures, the property expended cash of ($19,023) in 2006. During 2007, average occupancy was 91% and the property expended cash of ($65,739) due to increased maintenance expenditures and structural repairs of the eight units.
In 2006, the Colorado Housing and Finance Authority issued 8823s, citing the ten units that were unsuitable for occupancy for an extended period of time due to the structural issues noted above. As of April 2007, the ten units had been repaired and re-occupied. In May 2008, corrected 8823s for the ten units were filed with the IRS by the Colorado Finance Housing Agency.
The property operated above breakeven in 2008 with average occupancy of 96%. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy averaged 97%, and the property continued to operate above breakeven. While management expects improved operations and occupancy to continue going forward, it has discovered two units in the past nine months that were in need of structural repairs related to the floor joists. Management obtained bids and work was completed in June 2009 on the first unit. The bid was for $5,000 and was paid from operating cash. This unit was brought back online and was reoccupied in late June. A second unit is currently vacant and will undergo structural repairs during the fourth quarter of 2009. The repairs were anticipated to have been completed during the third quarter; however, the scope of work increased after further investigation. The contractor has agreed to honor the original bid of $4,000 and this will be paid from operating cash. Management anticipates filling this unit shortly thereafter. All real estate taxes, insurance, and mortgage payments are current. The operating general partner's obligation to fund operating deficits is unlimited in time and amount.
Effective July 1, 2008, the operating general partner brought in a new management company to manage its entire portfolio of 18 properties in Colorado. The change in management was intended to address unsatisfactory operations at several properties in the Colorado portfolio. The operating general partner is attempting to recapitalize its Colorado portfolio, including HS Housing, but the plan's likelihood for success is uncertain at this time. However, improved management has resulted in increased cash flow across the entire portfolio. The investment general partner has turned its focus toward obtaining a commitment from the operating general partner to fund the portfolio's identified near term capital improvements and payables out of the improved cash flow from the entire portfolio. The operating general partner signed a letter agreeing to fund capital needs at the Colorado properties, and advanced funds to two properties in June. If the operating general partner fails to complete the capital plan to which it has committed, the investment general partner will consider replacing the operating general partner.
Jeremy Associates, LP (Coopers Crossing Apartments) is a 93-unit family development located in Las Colinas, Texas. Average occupancy for 2007 was 90%, down 6% from the 2006 average occupancy. In 2008, average occupancy was 94%; however, the property continued to operate below breakeven due to high operating expenses and debt service. Operating expenses are high due mainly to inordinately high maintenance costs, as a result of severe physical deficiencies in a number of buildings on site. Since construction, a number of the buildings have had incidents of differential settlement resulting in cracked floor slabs, cracked brick veneer, cracked windows and doors and sagging balconies. These concerns have been addressed on an ongoing basis via advances by the operating general partner. Thus far the operating general partner has advanced over $1,600,000 for repairs and operating deficits. Occupancy levels are consistently above 90% at Coopers Crossing. However, despite high occupancy and cost control efforts, including staffing reduction, reduced marketing and the shutting down of one boiler during warmer months, the property continues to operate below breakeven. Through the third quarter of 2009, average occupancy is 95%, and the property continues to operate below breakeven. Debt service is high as the interest rate is 8.77%. The operating general partner has stated that refinance is not an option due to a prohibitively expensive yield maintenance penalty; however, he has stated that they have entered preliminary discussions with regards to reducing their monthly debt service via an alternative arrangement with the lender so as to allow the property increased cash flow. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits despite the expiration of the operating deficit guarantee. The investment general partner will continue to work with management to improve occupancy and reduce expenses. In addition, a representative of the investment general partner conducted a site visit during the third quarter of 2009 to evaluate the condition of the property. The operating general partner continues to address settlement concerns by slab jacking to stabilize movement. All buildings were on-line and deferred maintenance does not appear to be an issue. The operating general partner is actively repairing drywall cracks, adjusting sticking doors and repainting affected units. Settlement remains an ongoing issue at the property. The mortgage, trade payables, property taxes and insurance are current.
Centenary Housing, LP. (Centenary Tower Apartments) was a 100-unit senior property located in St. Louis, MO. The property operated at a deficit for the first time in 2005, due to operating expenses which exceeded the state average by 25%. Throughout 2006, third party management reports to the operating general partner and the investment general partner suggested that the property was operating adequately, although there were a few reports that drug use and other undesirable activity were increasing at the property. In the first quarter of 2007, the investment general partner learned that the City of St. Louis had cited the property as a nuisance twice in 2006. The property's security and habitability had deteriorated sharply during the second half of 2006 and the first quarter of 2007, with over 700 police calls from June 15, 2006 - February 28, 2007. After an additional citation from the City in the first quarter of 2007, the management company resigned effective February 1, 2007. The operating general partner took over management and hired new security personnel, but security guards were ineffective. On February 28, 2007, the on-site manager was assaulted on the premises and the operating general partner was unable to re-establish a management presence at the property.
On March 2, 2007, the City of St. Louis conducted a hearing and ordered the building closed pursuant to public nuisance ordinances. The Department of Housing and Urban Development terminated the Housing Assistance Payment contract. The trustee for the bonds declared default under the bond documents. The operating general partner chose not to contest the City's order or HUD's contract termination after determining that the highest recovery for the bondholders and limited partners might result from a sale to a developer who would convert the property to a non-affordable use. The operating general partner worked with HUD and local municipal officials to relocate the tenants, which concluded in early July 2007. The operating general partner engaged a broker who began marketing the property, but after three months of market exposure during the third quarter of 2007, the property had failed to elicit any strong expressions of interest. The lack of interest was in part attributable to the general problems in the credit market that occurred in the third quarter of 2007. In October 2007, the operating general partner determined that it would be costly to carry the property through the winter and offered to consensually transfer the property to the bondholders' trustee. As of December 2007, the bondholders' trustee had effectively taken control of the property, although it had not formally accepted the deed. The bondholders' trustee has been attempting to market the property since late 2007, with numerous offers falling through. In August 2009, the trustee identified a buyer that agreed to purchase the property for $375,000 and scheduled a foreclosure sale for late September. The property was sold at foreclosure sale to this buyer on September 23, 2009 for $375,000, or less than $.20 of the face value of the bonds. There are no proceeds to be returned to cash reserves. Annual losses generated by the Operating Partnership, which were applied against the investment limited partnership's investment in the Operating Partnership in accordance with the equity method of accounting, had previously reduced the investment limited partnership investment in the Operating Partnership to zero. Accordingly, no gain on the foreclosure of the Operating Partnership has been recorded.
Due to the property being shut down in 2007, investors lost 2007 tax credits and experienced recapture. The Operating Partnership lost $44,252 in tax credits and experienced recapture of $65,954. This represents credits and recapture of $16 and $24, respectively, per 1,000 BACs. The operating general partner has unlimited guarantees and the investment general partner intends to pursue payment under these guarantees in order to offset some or all of the expected recapture of tax credits. However, it is not certain at this time how much can be collected under the guarantees, based on the unknown financial strength of the guarantors.
New Chester Townhouses II, LP (Chester Townhouses Phase II) is a 52-unit, rehab property located in Chester, SC. In 2007, occupancy averaged 100% but the property operated below breakeven due to a significant increase in operating expenses from the prior year. The operating general partner states operating expenses were higher in 2007 because the property experienced $46,000 in costs that could not be capitalized in 2007. These costs include: legal fees, construction insurance, construction interest, consultant/tax credit fees, and developer fees. As of December 31, 2008, occupancy was 98% and averaged 97% for the year; the property operated at breakeven for the year. Occupancy has averaged 97% through the third quarter of 2009 and was 96% as of September 30, 2009. The property is operating above breakeven through the third quarter of 2009. The operating deficit guarantee is limited to $250,000 for a period of 36 months after rental achievement so long as the prior 12 months have maintained an average debt service ratio of 1.0 or greater. Rental achievement occurred in August 2007. The mortgage, real estate taxes and insurance payments are all current.
Marwood Senior Apartments is a new construction property for the elderly located in Upper Marlboro, Maryland. On May 31, 2008, a hailstorm damaged roof shingles, gutters, and trim. The damage was not discovered until a roof leak appeared on January 9, 2009. The leaks were temporarily repaired, and management contacted three companies for estimates of the damage. It was determined that the roof needed to be replaced. Work commenced in the first quarter 2009, and was projected to be completed by the third quarter of 2009. To date, the roof is nearly complete with minor details left to finalize. The first check was approved and executed by the investment general partner on June 5, 2009. The final insurance check is anticipated to be executed upon 100% completion of the project. The property has maintained 97% occupancy throughout 2009 and continues to operate above breakeven. All required reserves and escrows are fully funded. The investment general partner will continue to monitor the progress with the insurance claims and roof replacement until all work is completed and all funds are received from the insurance company.
Lynnelle Landing Limited Partnership (Lynnelle Landing Apartments) is a 56-unit family property located in Charleston, WV. Due to weak and declining economic conditions throughout 2008, many retail employers closed or reduced employee hours significantly. Retail employment composes a large portion of the property's tenant base and, as a result, the number of evictions increased. The 2008 average occupancy decreased from the previous year's average of 89% to 87%. Additionally, the manager was terminated in the fourth quarter of 2008, as she had become too lax with her responsibilities, particularly rent collections. The new manager, with 20 years experience, has been much more forceful and proactive with collections. The second quarter of 2009 occupancy averaged 83%. In May of 2009, eight apartments, the laundry room and maintenance shed were damaged by fire and water. Renovations were expected to be completed by September 2009; however, it took the insurance company 60 days to issue the scope of work, postponing the expected completion until November. Occupancy has further declined in the third quarter, to an average of 78%, due to residents moving out of the area in pursuit of new job opportunities. The property's income loss insurance covers 100% of the lost monthly rent on all eight units until construction is completed. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations to ensure operations have stabilized and occupancy has improved. The mortgage, real estate taxes and insurance payments are current.
Series 43
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 23 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 43 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(623,313) and $(599,315), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,183,840 and $1,241,826, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
San Diego/Fox Hollow, LP (Hollywood Palms Apts.) and its limited partner, BCP/Fox Hollow LLC filed a lawsuit against the former operating general partner and its affiliates for breaches of various agreements. In December of 2004, a judgment was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California (San Diego County) awarding the plaintiffs the amount of $3,507,426 plus post-judgment interest at an annual rate of 10%. The settlement included attorney's fees for the plaintiffs in the amount of $1,125,000 plus $123,697 in costs. The State Appeals Court upheld the judgment in the fourth quarter of 2006. The investment general partner has been pursuing payment, and on April 21, 2008, the deficiency was settled though mediation for a total of $3,950,000. The payment plan requires that cash payments of $1,650,000 be made within 200 days of settlement, and the remaining $2,300,000 be paid over time, secured by the defendant's interests in 8 real estate holdings. To date $1,300,000 has been collected.
An affiliate of the investment general partner has funded emergency repairs to stabilize hillside soils and reinforce retaining walls. The work will continue on an as needed basis. The Operating Partnership has asserted in court that the retaining wall was not constructed properly and has filed suit against the retaining wall contractor and the original general contractor of the property, who was replaced before completion of construction. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the case was settled in mediation for $2,001,000. During the first quarter 2008, the Operating Partnership received $1,993,500 in damages. The Operating Partnership is in the process of reimbursing the affiliate of the investment general partner for the funds they have advanced for the repairs. The balance of the settlement, held in reserves, will be used to complete the necessary repairs and associated landscaping. The property operated above breakeven in 2007, 2008 and continues to do so in 2009. The investment general partner continues to monitor the completion of the remaining construction work. The mortgage, taxes, and insurance are current.
Dorchester Court Apartments (Dorchester Court Limited Dividend Housing Association, LP) is a 131-unit apartment complex located in Port Huron, MI, with 75% of the units devoted to elderly housing. Due to construction delays and slow initial lease-up, the property experienced difficulty generating positive cash flow. One of the two original members of the operating general partner entity was unable to contribute his share of the advances required under the operating deficit guarantee. In July 2005, one of the original members was replaced and the new member was inserted as the second member of the operating general partner entity. Although the new second member did not assume the obligations of the guarantor, it had significant resources and contributed over $190,000 to the Operating Partnership to fund the property's operating deficits during the 2006-2007 periods. In 2008, however, growing tensions between the two current members resulted in less attention being paid to management of the property and diminished willingness of the operating general partner to fund deficits. In May 2009, the Operating Partnership approved the transfer of interests within the operating general partner entity; the new second member transferred its interest to the remaining single member. As noted above, the members had been at odds and the transfer was deemed likely to clarify control of the entity and result in improved performance of the property.
Occupancy averaged 90% for 2008 and the first three quarters of 2009. The property operated just below breakeven in 2008 and continues to operate below breakeven in 2009, due to low occupancy in the first four months of 2009; however, the property did operate above breakeven in the third quarter. In 2007, the Operating Partnership refinanced its first mortgage, resulting in a significant improvement in operations over 2006. Under the new debt service and assuming expenses are maintained in line with those of 2008, the property should be able to breakeven at 93% occupancy. As of September 2009, occupancy had risen to 92%. The operating general partner believes that with the change in the general partner entity noted above, occupancy will continue to rise, and in turn, operations will improve. Prior to the refinance, the operating general partner had not funded the replacement reserve account; however, the Operating Partnership has been funding the replacement reserve, in accordance with the loan and Operating Partnership agreements, since September 2007. The mortgage, taxes and insurance payments are all current. Accounts payable stood at $41,000 as of September 2009, down approximately $20,000 from June 2009.
Lakewood Apartments-Saranac, LP (Lakewood Apartments) is a 24-unit property located in Saranac, MI. The area suffers from very low employment, lack of public transportation and limited retail (grocery) stores. In addition, the property only has seven subsidized units while other area properties are 100% subsidized. As a result, occupancy averaged only 79% in 2007 and the property operated below breakeven. Starting in the second quarter of 2008, management lowered the security deposit from one month's rent to $99, waived the $20 application fee, and offered one month free rent. In addition, private rental assistance of up to $200/month for qualified applicants was offered. This increased the average occupancy in 2008 to 89%, although the property still operated below breakeven. The concessions were kept in place until occupancy reached 100% in March 2009. Occupancy has since dropped to 83% in August. The year-to-date average occupancy remains at 92% with operations slightly below breakeven due to lost revenue from concessions. The approved workout plan with Rural Development to replenish the under-funded replacement reserve account was successfully completed in December 2008. Real estate taxes, insurance and mortgage payments are current. The operating general partner's operating deficit guaranty expired in February 2009.
Carpenter School I Elderly Apartments, L.P. (Carpenter School I Elderly Apartments) is a 38-unit property located in Natchez, MS. In January 2007, upon a physical inspection, it was discovered that the property had mold issues. The operating general partner was notified immediately. Fortunately, the issues were not too severe and could be resolved with a more rigorous maintenance plan. The operating general partner implemented a comprehensive maintenance plan to avoid such issues in the future. In the fourth quarter 2007, the management company hired a full time manager and a part time assistant manager. The property has finally become more equipped to deal with the heavy traffic, which resulted from newspaper advertisement. Also, in October 2007, the property experienced a fire resulting in two damaged units, which were off line through February 2008. All the required repairs were finished by March 2008. In March 2008, the investment general partner's inspector visited the property to confirm that all repairs had been made. Average physical occupancy for 2008 was 91% and the property finished the year with a slight operating deficit. Average physical occupancy has remained stable at 92% through the third quarter 2009. The property continues to operate below breakeven. As a result of aggressive advertising, physical occupancy is gradually improving. Marketing consists of advertisements in the local newspaper and distributing fliers to local business, churches, and schools. Management has also contacted the local housing authority and has instituted a resident referral program. To help retain residents, management is organizing on-site events to enhance the sense of community at the property. The investment general partner emphasized the importance of resident retention and is working with management to develop more regular social programs and activities at the property. The investment general partner will continue to work with the operating general partner in an effort to stabilize operations above breakeven. The mortgage, real estate taxes, insurance and account payables are all current.
Parkside Plaza, L.P. (Parkside Plaza Apartments) is a 39-unit co-op property located in Harlem, New York. The property operated below breakeven in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 due to high utility, maintenance and administrative expenses combined with collection loss. Management is exploring options to reduce utility costs, including tenant education on conservation and possible grant funding from non-profit agencies to conserve energy. A rent increase of 2% was effective January 1, 2009 and the operating general partner was recently granted an approval of a special increase request for the maximum amount allowable of 10% from the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, or DHCR, effective June 1, 2009. Additional rent increases are planned for 2010 and 2011. Management is working to reduce tenant delinquencies by aggressively filing late notices and pursuing evictions through the housing court. Collections remain an ongoing and serious issue. Physical occupancy was 100% as of September 2009. The investment general partner continues to work with the operating general partner to improve operations. In January 2009, the investment general partner demanded that the operating general partner bring the mortgage current. The operating general partner received approval from the Lender and DHCR for release of operating reserve funds to bring the mortgage current. The investment general partner met with the operating general partner and management and completed a site inspection during the second quarter of 2009. The site visit revealed that the property was in very good condition. Insurance payments are current and the operating general partner has funded deficits, but not at the levels required. The operating general partner stated that there are funds accessible for future deficit funding as needed. Management indicated that the main area of concern is high accounts payable, which are predicated upon high accounts receivable. The tenant delinquency report and rent roll indicate that a significant portion of the accounts receivable are attributable to tenants who have inhabited the property for more than 10 years. To help combat increases in tenant receivables management is implementing the following measures: a stricter tenant screening process, a change in legal counsel for tenant court, and an analysis of "tenant hold over" (court process, with hope of rent collection) versus "tenant non-payment" (eviction with no hope of rent collection). General legal proceedings take at least six months before a tenant will have to appear in rent court in front of a judge. History shows that legal decisions in New York City involving low-income housing tend to rule in favor of the tenant. The mortgage and insurance are current.
New Chester Townhouses II, LP (Chester Townhouses Phase II) is a 52-unit, rehab property located in Chester, SC. In 2007, occupancy averaged 100% but the property operated below breakeven due to a significant increase in operating expenses from the prior year. The operating general partner states operating expenses were higher in 2007 because the property experienced $46,000 in costs that could not be capitalized in 2007. These costs include: legal fees, construction insurance, construction interest, consultant/tax credit fees, and developer fees. As of December 31, 2008, occupancy was 98% and averaged 97% for the year; the property operated at breakeven for the year. Occupancy has averaged 97% through the third quarter of 2009 and was 96% as of September 30, 2009. The property is operating above breakeven through the third quarter of 2009. The operating deficit guarantee is limited to $250,000 for a period of 36 months after rental achievement so long as the prior 12 months have maintained an average debt service ratio of 1.0 or greater. Rental achievement occurred in August 2007. The mortgage, real estate taxes and insurance payments are all current.
Alexander Mills, Limited Partnership (Alexander Mills Apartments) is a 224-unit family property located about 30 miles northeast of Atlanta, in Lawrenceville, GA. Occupancy began to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008 reaching 89% in December. Occupancy has improved to 93% as of September 2009. The major employers in the area have cut either staffing levels or worker's hours. As most residents are hourly employees, those who have retained their jobs have had their income significantly reduced. Also, the decline in the construction industry has led to additional vacancies at the site. Management has been very proactive in cutting expenses, collecting tenant receivables, and developing rent payment work-out plans to retain residents where possible. Management does not expect the job market to turn around in the near future. The investment general partner performed a site visit in September 2009. The property was found in excellent condition. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations to ensure stabilization. The property was transferred to the investment general partner's special assets group in October 2009. The operating general partner did not make the September 2009 mortgage payment. The October mortgage payment was made late. The operating general partner is now in contact with the lender in hopes of gaining an interest only forbearance for a two year period. At this point the operating general partner is supplying the lender with financial projections and a workout proforma. The real estate taxes and insurance payments are current.
Riverview Apartments - Blissfield L.D.H.A., LP (Riverview Apartments) is a 32-unit family property located in Blissfield, MI. Historically, the property has averaged 95% occupancy. Beginning in 2007, occupancy began to drop due to the downturn in the local economy. It averaged 89% for the year and the property operated below breakeven. In 2008, occupancy averaged 87% through the first three quarters. Management was able to improve the occupancy to 93% in the fourth quarter, but the property operated below breakeven for the year. Occupancy dropped back down in the beginning of 2009, averaging 90% through June. A new site manager was hired at the end of June to improve the property's outreach and marketing efforts. He has been very effective, increasing occupancy to 97% in July 2009 and then 100% as of the end of September 2009. The property is expected to operate slightly below breakeven for the year, but with the new manager in place, it is projected to breakeven in 2010. The operating general partner's operating deficit guarantee runs through 2014 and he continues to fund deficits as needed. All taxes, mortgage and insurance payments are current.
Series 44
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy was 100%. The series had a total of 10 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 44 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(633,163) and $(492,401), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,235,926 and $1,211,209, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Brookside Park Limited Partnership (Brookside Park Apartments) is a 200-unit family property located in Atlanta, Georgia. Occupancy fell to a low of 89% in March 2007, as a result of crime in the surrounding neighborhood. Management responded by replacing chain link fencing with more durable hard fence, thinning shrub cover and installing alarm systems in every unit. Occupancy rebounded by the end of the year, averaging 94% and further improved to 96% through the fourth quarter of 2008. At the end of the second quarter of 2008, the operating general partner interest was transferred. As part of the transfer, the new operating general partner agreed to extend the operating deficit guarantee, which was set to expire in 2008, for a period of three years. The property converted its construction loan to permanent financing effective June 2, 2008.
For 2008, the property reduced its operating deficit in half, compared to 2007. The operating general partner funded deficits in the form of cash advances and by accruing payables/management fees. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property operated slightly below breakeven. Occupancy at the end of the third quarter 2009 decreased to 90%, again attributed to criminal activity in and around the property. Management indicated that over the last six months the property has experienced a handful of home invasions. To combat the recent influx in crime, management is transferring a market rate unit to a courtesy office unit, to be occupied by a police officer. In conjunction with the police officer, management will hire a security guard to work 20-30 hours per week. This will be budgeted for 2010.
On March 3, 2009, the new operating general partner issued a statement to the investment general partner informing of a management change effective May 1, 2009. On June 20, 2008, the original operating general partner sold its interest in the Operating Partnership. The original operating general partner agreed to continue to manage the portfolio after the transaction, with the mutual understanding that they wanted to exit the property management business at some point in the near future. As the Atlanta rental market became increasingly more challenging towards the second half of 2008, it was agreed that the original operating partner would relinquish their management responsibilities, effective May 1, 2009. The new operating general partner believes that the new management will fit the role seamlessly as they have extensive tax credit industry experience. As of May 1, 2009, the investment general partner has reviewed and approved the management change. A site visit conducted in April 2009 rated the property in excellent condition. All mortgage, taxes, and insurance payments remain current.
Alexander Mills, Limited Partnership (Alexander Mills Apartments) is a 224-unit family property located about 30 miles northeast of Atlanta, in Lawrenceville, GA. Occupancy began to decline in the fourth quarter of 2008 reaching 89% in December. Occupancy has improved to 93% as of September 2009. The major employers in the area have cut either staffing levels or worker's hours. As most residents are hourly employees, those who have retained their jobs have had their income significantly reduced. Also, the decline in the construction industry has led to additional vacancies at the site. Management has been very proactive in cutting expenses, collecting tenant receivables, and developing rent payment work-out plans to retain residents where possible. Management does not expect the job market to turn around in the near future. The investment general partner preformed a site visit in September 2009. The property was found in excellent condition. The investment general partner will continue to monitor operations to ensure stabilization. The property was transferred to the investment general partner's special assets group in October 2009. The operating general partner did not make the September 2009 mortgage payment. The October mortgage payment was made late. The operating general partner is now in contact with the lender in hopes of gaining an interest only forbearance for a two year period. At this point the operating general partner is supplying the lender with financial projections and a workout proforma. The real estate taxes and insurance payments are current.
United Development CO. 2001 LP (Memphis 102), is a 102-unit scattered site family development, located in Memphis, TN. Occupancy in 2008 averaged 90% and the property operated below breakeven. In 2008 it was determined that the accrued real estate taxes were understated due to incremental assessments by both the City of Memphis and Shelby County. The operating general partner is working with its auditors and municipal officials to reconcile the amount of total taxes outstanding. The replacement reserve, operating reserve and security deposit escrow account were all under-funded in 2008. The investment general partner is working closely with the operating general partner to ensure that these accounts are properly funded going forward. In 2009, occupancy is averaging 87% and operating just above breakeven. The investment general partner will visit the site in the fourth quarter of 2009 to meet with the operating general partner and review the operational and accounting issues. The operating general partner continues to fund operating deficits as needed. The mortgage payments, insurance, and accounts payables are all current.
Series 45
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100% and 99.9%, respectively. The series had a total of 30 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 45 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(728,847) and $(838,350), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $1,558,879 and $1,547,218 respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Baldwin Villas Limited Partnership (Baldwin Villas) is a 65-unit property located in Pontiac, MI. The project consists of single family rental homes, with home ownership an option available to qualifying tenants. Because the cost to build the project approximated the cost for a single-family development, construction of the project required a significant amount of debt. As a result, the rent structure required to support the project is high, and most tenants need significant subsidy to afford the $1,000+/ per month rents.
During 2006, occupancy at Baldwin Villas averaged over 90% and the property generated $61,425 in cash. Due in part to the decreased availability of portable Section 8 vouchers caused by funding constraints, average occupancy declined in 2007 to 82% and the property operated below breakeven. In October 2007, the operating general partner engaged a new property management company to manage several of its properties, including Baldwin. The property continued to operate below breakeven in 2008. Through the third quarter of 2009, occupancy averaged 86%, although occupancy dropped to 83% in July. Operations continue to be below breakeven. Unemployment is high in Pontiac, a suburb of Detroit, and the local housing authority has stopped issuing vouchers due to funding cuts. Operating expenses remain well above state averages due to the fact that the property consists of single family homes. Maintenance expenses in 2008 were almost three times the state average, which is attributable to extremely costly unit turnovers, and maintenance expenses are projected to be even higher in 2009. Management began using a new credit agency for more comprehensive credit checks in August 2008 in an effort to curb unit turnovers and tenant receivables; however, evictions for non-payment of rent continue to be an issue. Additionally, the homes were built on slabs and settling has caused plumbing issues and shifting of some of the exterior walkways. Repairs are being made on an as-needed basis every other month. The site manager is working with the local housing authority to obtain voucher holder referrals, has held several open houses in the second quarter of 2009, has increased radio and newspaper advertisements, and is offering a free months rent to attract new tenants.
Reporting by the operating general partner has not been timely in the past. In the third quarter of 2008 the investment general partner received the 2007 draft audit which revealed that, in 2007, the operating general partner had renegotiated the loan agreement to defer 2007 principal payments. As a result, principal payments in 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 were deferred. The Operating Partnership remains current on the interest portion of its debt service. The operating general partner is currently in discussions with the lender/letter of credit issuer, trying to obtain an extension of the letter of credit. Long term solutions under discussion include marking the current debt to market, but discussions are at a very early stage. Real estate taxes remain unpaid, but the operating general partner did file an appeal in 2009 (currently pending). Payables are high and continue to increase. Reporting appears to have improved in 2009, and the 2008 audited financial statement and the 2009 quarterly statements were delivered in a timely manner.
The investment general partner is closely monitoring the management company's ability to increase occupancy and cash flow, reduce unit turnovers, and control maintenance expenses and bad debt. The investment general partner continues to press the operating general partner for a plan to pay down unpaid real estate taxes and growing payables.
Childress Apartments LTD (Fairview Manor Apartments) is a 48-unit development located in Childress, TX. Despite averaging 84% occupancy in 2007, the property operated above breakeven due to a rent increase coupled with funds withdrawn from the replacement reserve account for expensed improvements. At the end of the second quarter of 2008, hail and wind from a severe storm caused broken windows with resulting water damage to carpeting. The damage was covered by insurance and the windows and carpeting have all been repaired or replaced as needed. The property received the insurance proceeds during the third quarter 2008. During this time, several residents chose to leave the property causing a decrease in occupancy. Despite a 2008 average occupancy of 78%, the property operated above breakeven due to a casualty gain from the insurance proceeds. In 2009, occupancy has avaraged 91% with above breakeven operations. Increased marketing efforts including newspaper advertising and handing out flyers at the Chamber of Commerce and local churches has been effective at bringing in potential residents. The management company will adjust their tenant selection criteria to include credit reports in an effort to improve collections and reduce the evictions for non-payment. The operating general partner continues to fund all deficits. The mortgage, taxes and insurance are all current.
Harbet Avenue, LP (William B. Quarton Place) is a 28-unit family property located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. During 2004, and through February 2005, inappropriate checks and wires were made to the operating general partner from the Operating Partnership's escrow and operating accounts. The total of the misappropriated funds has been determined to be $142,758. To date, funds totaling $97,265 have been repaid to the Operating Partnership, leaving an outstanding balance owed of $45,494. A default notice was sent to the operating general partner on September 1, 2005. A demand letter sent to the operating general partner in July 2006 then followed up the default notice. The operating general partner has disclosed that they continue to have financial difficulties and are unable to continue as a viable organization. Another non-profit organization was retained to take over property management. The investment general partner met with representatives of both the original non-profit operating general partner and new management to determine a course of action that serves the best interest of the Operating Partnership. The new management has expressed their desire to assume the role of operating general partner as they are committed to preserving affordable housing in the Cedar Rapids area, and have formed an entity to step in as the operating general partner. An agreement has been proposed and amendments to the Operating Partnership agreement have been drafted. It is anticipated the transfer will occur prior to year-end 2009. Occupancy is strong, averaging 97% in 2008, and 97% through the third quarter of 2009. The property is operating above breakeven due to low operating expenses, combined with 100% soft debt financing, requiring payments of principal and interest from cash flow only. Trade payables, taxes and insurance are all current. A recent site visit found that the property was well maintained and managed. The investment general partner will continue to closely monitor operations and the status of the pending transfer of the operating general partner interest.
Brookside Park Limited Partnership (Brookside Park Apartments) is a 200-unit family property located in Atlanta, Georgia. Occupancy fell to a low of 89% in March 2007, as a result of crime in the surrounding neighborhood. Management responded by replacing chain link fencing with more durable hard fence, thinning shrub cover and installing alarm systems in every unit. Occupancy rebounded by the end of the year, averaging 94% and further improved to 96% through the fourth quarter of 2008. At the end of the second quarter of 2008, the operating general partner interest was transferred. As part of the transfer, the new operating general partner agreed to extend the operating deficit guarantee, which was set to expire in 2008, for a period of three years. The property converted its construction loan to permanent financing effective June 2, 2008.
For 2008, the property reduced its operating deficit in half, compared to 2007. The operating general partner funded deficits in the form of cash advances and by accruing payables/management fees. Through the third quarter of 2009, the property operated slightly below breakeven. Occupancy at the end of the third quarter 2009 decreased to 90%, again attributed to criminal activity in and around the property. Management indicated that over the last six months the property has experienced a handful of home invasions. To combat the recent influx in crime, management is transferring a market rate unit to a courtesy office unit, to be occupied by a police officer. In conjunction with the police officer, management will hire a security guard to work 20-30 hours per week. This will be budgeted for 2010.
On March 3, 2009, the new operating general partner issued a statement to the investment general partner informing of a management change effective May 1, 2009. On June 20, 2008, the original operating general partner sold its interest in the Operating Partnership. The original operating general partner agreed to continue to manage the portfolio after the transaction, with the mutual understanding that they wanted to exit the property management business at some point in the near future. As the Atlanta rental market became increasingly more challenging towards the second half of 2008, it was agreed that the original operating partner would relinquish their management responsibilities, effective May 1, 2009. The new operating general partner believes that the new management will fit the role seamlessly as they have extensive tax credit industry experience. As of May 1, 2009, the investment general partner has reviewed and approved the management change. A site visit conducted in April 2009 rated the property in excellent condition. All mortgage, taxes, and insurance payments remain current.
Series 46
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, the average Qualified Occupancy for the series was 100%. The series had a total of 15 properties at September 30, 2009, all of which were at 100% Qualified Occupancy.
For the six month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, Series 46 reflects a net loss from Operating Partnerships of $(314,417) and $(394,531), respectively, which includes depreciation and amortization of $654,478 and $744,541, respectively. This is an interim period estimate; it is not indicative of the final year-end results.
Saint Martin Apartments, L.P. (Saint Martin Apartments) is a 40-unit new construction development located in McComb, Mississippi. Construction was completed April 4, 2006. The property operated below breakeven in 2008 despite averaging 98% occupancy, primarily due to a high debt level. Rents were increased by $60 per unit in 2008. The operating general partner will seek another rent increase in 2009. Occupancy at the end of the third quarter 2009 was 98%, yet the property continues to operate below breakeven. The operating deficit guarantee is unlimited in amount for the thirty-six months following rental achievement. There is an additional stipulation that the complex must sustain debt service coverage at 1.15 for twelve consecutive months before the guarantee is released. The operating general partner has funded all operating deficits in accordance with the guarantee. All real estate tax, mortgage, and insurance payments are current. The investment general partner will work with the operating general partner in an effort to either pay down the debt or refinance, as the high debt level is the sole cause of the partnership's poor performance.
Linden-Shawnee Partners, LP (Linden's Apartments) is a 54-unit family development, located in Shawnee, OK. Occupancy averaged 92% in 2008 and has decreased to an average of 83% through the third quarter of 2009. Even with the decrease in occupancy, the property continues to operate above breakeven. The local economy in Shawnee has experienced negative effects due to employment levels decreasing, causing the local resident population to seek employment in Oklahoma City where there are more jobs available. The property rents are lower than the area fair market rents. This has prompted management to target the competing properties by sending a mass-mailing to over 700 residences to promote lower rents at Linden's Apartments. The mailing revealed that of those 700 apartments, at least 85 units were vacant as the mailings were returned. Management did another mass-mailing in October, 2009 to over 500 units with slightly lower rents to better determine market conditions. The mailings were to all rental units excluding nursing homes. Incentives include two months free rent, contingent upon executing leases by the end of October. In order to increase visibility of the property from the street, management intends to clear trees in between the property and the road. If units still remain vacant after the increased efforts, they plan to offer washers and dryers in the units. The mortgage payments, taxes, and insurance are all current.
Wagoner Village Apartments, LP (Wagoner Village Apartments) is a 31-unit family property located in Wagoner, OK. Despite an average occupancy of 89% in 2007, the property operated above breakeven. In 2008, occupancy decreased to an average of 83%, resulting in below breakeven operations. Management has increased marketing efforts and worked closely with local businesses to improve occupancy through referrals. In addition, the operating general partner converted 4 one-bedroom apartments into 2 three-bedroom apartments to meet the growing demand for larger units. Both units were rented quickly when they came online in late 2008 and are currently occupied. With the increased marketing efforts and successful unit conversions, occupancy increased to 93% as of March 2009 and 100% as of September 2009. The property is expected to operate below breakeven for the year. The operating general partner continues to fund deficits as needed. The property's mortgage, real estate taxes, and insurance payments are all current.
Principal Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), which require the Fund to make various estimates and assumptions. The following section is a summary of some aspects of those accounting policies that may require subjective or complex judgments and are most important to the portrayal of the Fund's financial condition and results of operations. The Fund believes that there is a low probability that the use of different estimates or assumptions in making these judgments would result in materially different amounts being reported in the financial statements.
The Fund is required to assess potential impairments to its long-lived assets, which are primarily investments in limited partnerships. The Fund accounts for its investment in limited partnerships in accordance with the equity method of accounting since the Fund does not control the operations of the Operating Partnerships. The purpose of an impairment analysis is to verify that the real estate investment balance reflected on the balance sheet does not exceed the value of the underlying investments.
If the book value of the Fund's investment in an Operating Partnership exceeds the estimated value derived by management, which generally consists of the remaining future Low-Income Housing Credits allocable to the Fund and the estimated residual value to the Fund, the Fund reduces its investment in the Operating Partnership and includes this reduction in equity in loss of investment of limited partnerships.
The main reason an impairment loss typically occurs is that the annual operating losses, recorded in accordance with the equity method of accounting, of the investment in limited partnership does not reduce the balance as quickly as the annual use of the tax credits. In years prior to the year ended March 31, 2009, management included remaining tax credits as well as residual value in the calculated value of the underlying investments. However, due to the uncertainty of the current economy, management decided to take a more conservative approach to the investment calculation and determined that the majority of the residual value component of the valuation was zero for the year ended March 31, 2009. This resulted in increased impairment losses. However, it is important to note that this change in the accounting estimate to the calculation method of the impairment loss has no effect on the actual value or performance of the overall investment, nor does it have any effect on the remaining credits to be generated.
As of March 31, 2004, the Fund adopted GAAP for the Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. GAAP provides guidance on when a company should include the assets, liabilities, and activities of a variable interest entity ("VIE") in its financial statements and when it should disclose information about its relationship with a VIE. A VIE is a legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets, which must be consolidated by a company if it is the primary beneficiary because it absorbs the majority of the entity's expected losses, the majority of the expected returns, or both.
Principal Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates - continued
Based on this guidance, the Operating Partnerships in which the Fund invests meet the definition of a VIE. However, management does not consolidate the Fund's interests in these VIEs under this guidance, as it is not considered to be the primary beneficiary. The Fund currently records the amount of its investment in these partnerships as an asset on its balance sheet, recognizes its share of partnership income or losses in the statements of operations, and discloses how it accounts for material types of these investments in its financial statements.
The Fund's balance in investment in Operating Partnerships, plus the risk of recapture of tax credits previously recognized on these investments, represents its maximum exposure to loss. The Fund's exposure to loss on these partnerships is mitigated by the condition and financial performance of the underlying properties as well as the strength of the local general partners and their guarantee against credit recapture.
Recent Accounting Changes
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued GAAP for Fair Value Measurements, now superseded by the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification guidance (ASC) which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and shall be applied prospectively except for very limited transactions. In February 2008, the FASB delayed for one year implementation of the guidance as it pertains to certain non-financial assets and liabilities. The Fund adopted GAAP for Fair Value Measurements effective April 1, 2008, except as it applies to those non-financial assets and liabilities, for which the effective date was April 1, 2009. The Fund has determined that adoption of this guidance has no material impact on the Fund's financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued guidance for The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, now superseded by the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB ASC. This guidance permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value election is designed to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. On April 1, 2008, the Fund adopted this guidance and elected not to apply the provisions to its eligible financial assets and financial liabilities on the date of adoption. Accordingly, the initial application of the guidance had no effect on the Fund.
In June 2006, guidance for Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of GAAP for Accounting for Income Taxes, was issued (now superseded by the Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC). This requires all taxpayers to analyze all material positions they have taken or plan to take in all tax returns that have been filed or should have been filed with all taxing authorities for all years still subject to challenge by those taxing authorities. If the position taken is "more-likely-than-not" to be sustained by the taxing authority on its technical merits and if there is more than a 50% likelihood that the position would be
Recent Accounting Changes - continued
sustained if challenged and considered by the highest court in the relevant jurisdiction, the tax consequences of that position should be reflected in the taxpayer's GAAP financial statements. Earlier proposed interpretations of GAAP for Accounting for Income Taxes had recommended a "probable" standard for recognition of tax consequences rather than the "more-likely-than-not" standard finally adopted.
Because we are a pass-through entity and are not required to pay income taxes, this guidance does not currently have any impact on our financial statements. On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued further guidance for Certain Nonpublic Enterprises, which deferred the effective date for nonpublic enterprises to the annual financial statements for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The deferred effective date was intended to give the Board additional time to develop guidance on its application to pass-through entities and not-for-profit organizations. We may modify our disclosures if the FASB's guidance regarding the application to pass-through entities changes and is extended to public enterprises.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance for Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This requires disclosure about the method and significant assumptions used to establish the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as annual statements. It is effective for Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. as of June 30, 2009 and has no impact on the Fund's financial condition or results of operations.
In November 2008, the FASB issued guidance on Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations, now superseded by the Equity Method and Joint Ventures Topic of the FASB ASC, that addresses how the initial carrying value of an equity method investment should be determined, how an impairment assessment of an underlying indefinite-lived intangible asset of an equity method investment should be performed, how an equity method investee's issuance of shares should be accounted for, and how to account for a change in an investment from the equity method to the cost method. This guidance is effective in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Fund adopted the guidance for the interim quarterly period beginning April 1, 2009. The impact of adopting it does not have a material impact on the Fund's financial condition or results of operations.
In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance for Subsequent Events in the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC. It establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It is effective for Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. as of June 30, 2009, and has no material impact on the Fund's financial condition or results of operations.
Item 3 |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Not Applicable |
Item 4T |
Controls & Procedures |
|
(a) |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
|
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Fund's general partner, under the supervision and with the participation of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of C&M Management Inc., carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Fund's "disclosure controls and procedures" as defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on that evaluation, the Fund's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Fund's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Fund's management, including the Fund's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
||
(b) |
Changes in Internal Controls |
|
There were no changes in the Fund's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
|
None |
||
Item 1A. |
Risk Factors |
|
There have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. |
||
Item 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
None |
||
Item 3. |
Defaults upon Senior Securities |
|
None |
||
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
None |
||
Item 5. |
Other Information |
|
None |
||
Item 6. |
Exhibits |
|
31.a Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith |
||
31.b Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer, filed herewith |
||
32.a Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith |
||
32.b Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer, filed herewith |
||
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. |
|||
By: |
Boston Capital Associates IV L.P. |
||
By: |
BCA Associates Limited Partnership |
||
By: |
C&M Management, Inc. |
||
Date: November 16, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ John P. Manning |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Fund and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
DATE: |
SIGNATURE: |
TITLE: |
November 16, 2009 |
/s/ John P. Manning |
Director, President (Principal Executive Officer), C&M Management, Inc.; Director, President (Principal Executive Officer) BCTC IV Assignor Corp. |
John P. Manning |
||
November 16, 2009 |
/s/ Marc N. Teal Marc N. Teal |
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) C&M Management Inc.; Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) BCTC IV Assignor Corp. |