Provision Holding, Inc. - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Provision Holding, Inc.	ex311.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Provision Holding, Inc.	ex321.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 333-127347

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

State of Nevada	20-0754724
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

9253 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California	91311
(Address of principal executive officers)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (818) 775-1624

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes x No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ¨ Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨			Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨			Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.): ¨ Yes x No

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of these shares on the OTC Bulletin Board on December 31, 2008, was $740,797. For the purposes of this disclosure only, the registrant has assumed that its directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of 5% or more of the registrant’s common stock are affiliates of the registrant.

As of November 12, 2009, there were 27,637,644 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I

Item 1.	Business	3

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6

Item 2.	Properties	7

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	7

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	7

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	7

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	8

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	9

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	9

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	15

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	15

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	15

Item 9B.	Other Information	16

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	17

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	19

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	20

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	21

Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	21

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	22

	Signatures	23

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not deemed to represent an all-inclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements as denoted in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Additionally, statements concerning future matters are forward-looking statements.

Although forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements. These risks, assumptions and uncertainties include: the ability to develop customers and generate revenues; the ability to compete effectively in a rapidly evolving marketplace; the impact of technological change; our ability to protect our intellectual property in the United States and other countries; our ability to raise capital to implement our business plan; and other risks referenced from time to time in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as required by law. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made throughout the entirety of this Annual Report, which are designed to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

PART I

ITEM 1.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

References to “we”, “us”, “our” and similar words refer to ProVision. References to “MailTec” refer to the Company and its business prior to the reverse acquisition.

Business History and Overview

We were incorporated in Nevada under the name MailTec, Inc. on February 9, 2004. Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 14, 2008, which was amended and restated on February 27, 2008 (as amended and restated, the “Agreement”), MailTec, Inc. with ProVision Merger Corp., a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Subsidiary”) and Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc., a California corporation (“ProVision”), the Subsidiary merged into ProVision, and ProVision became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. As consideration for the merger of the Subsidiary into ProVision, the Company issued 20,879,350 shares of the Company’s common stock to the shareholders, creditors, and certain warrant holders of ProVision, representing approximately 86.5% of the Company’s aggregate issued and outstanding common stock, and the outstanding shares and debt, and those warrants whose holders received shares of the Company’s common stock, of ProVision were transferred to the Company and cancelled. Effective February 28, 2008, pursuant to the Agreement, ProVision became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The acquisition of ProVision is treated as a reverse acquisition, and the business of ProVision became the business of the Company. At the time of the reverse acquisition, MailTec was not engaged in any active business.

We are located in Chatsworth and focused on the development and distribution of our patented three-dimensional, holographic interactive video displays focused at grabbing and holding consumer attention particularly and initially in the advertising and product merchandising markets. The systems display a moving 3D image size to forty inches in front of the display, projecting a digital video image out into space detached from any screen, rendering truly independent floating images featuring high definition and crisp visibility from far distances. The nearest comparable to this technology can be seen in motion pictures such as Star Wars and Minority Report, where objects and humans are represented through full-motion holograms. In addition to selling the hardware for our patented three-dimensional, holographic interactive video displays, we are building our business into a digital media company offering advertising on a network of our 3D holographic video displays.

We have a limited operating history upon which an investor can evaluate our business prospects, which makes it difficult to forecast our future operating results, in light of the risks, uncertainties and problems frequently encountered by companies with limited operating histories. These include, but are not limited to, competition, the need to develop customers and market expertise, market conditions, sales, and marketing and governmental regulation.

Products and Services

We believe we are well positioned to capitalize on the advertiser’s demand. ProVision’s HoloVision™ display offers advertisers and customers an opportunity to reach a highly sought-after, captive audience outside the home, in familiar settings like grocery stores, malls, convenience stores, gas stations, banks and other retail locations. We reach the consumer and business professional at the critical time - when they are away from their homes and businesses and when they are making their buying decisions.

ProVision is marketing our patented three-dimensional, holographic interactive video display and is also developing and marketing several new point-of-purchase, and other devices, tailored to specific industries with major international companies or readying to begin shortly; including the medical, entertainment, government and home markets. ProVision’s floating image display technologies have multiple potential market applications across a broad spectrum of industries. In addition to hardware sales, we are initially focusing our efforts on the point-of-purchase and advertising markets.

Business Development

Launching our first products into grocery stores, we have developed a new patent pending application. Known as the “3DEO Rewards Center” or “3DEO”, this ProVision device projects 3D video advertisements and allows consumers to print coupons as well as receive non-cash awards. The 3DEO device provides food companies and other advertisers with a new way of promoting their products at the point of purchase, where consumers are making seventy percent of their buying decisions.

We tested our concept in Fred Meyer Stores, a division of The Kroger, Co., installing 3DEO Centers in the Pacific Northwest. We received advertising placements from some of the largest manufacturers in the country, including Unilever, Proctor & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, BIC and Kimberly Clark. The manufacturers’ will advertise through digital coupons that customers will receive from Provision’s 3DEO Media Centers.

We plan to build, own, and operate networks of 3DEO Rewards Centers. In March 2008 we signed three-year agreements with several independent Hispanic grocery store chains to install 3DEO Reward Centers in 47 locations in southern California. In September 2008, we signed an agreement with the Long Island Gasoline Retailers Association (“LIGRA”) to install its patented 3D holographic displays in up to 800 member stores throughout New York. Provision’s displays will be located inside the independent convenience stores of major franchise gasoline retailers including Shell, ExxonMobil, Citgo, Sunoco, BP, Amoco and Gulf.

We signed a five-year agreement with ADCENTRICITY, Inc. to sell advertising on our digital signage network. We also signed a letter of intent with LocalAdLink to support our local and regional advertising sales.

In April 2008, we announced that we sold an HL40D system to one of the nation’s leading quick service restaurant chains, which will begin testing applications for the 3D holographic unit immediately. The quick service restaurant chain will be exploring everything from digital signage to interactive kiosk order stations, drive through uses, and the effects from various “marketing zones” within and around the store property.

Provision announced in May 2008 that is working with one of the world’s largest coffee franchises to test a variety of in-store digital signage applications utilizing Provision’s HL40D displays. Once successful, Provision will install up to 109 systems in the quick service chain’s greater New York City area stores. Testing will include projecting full color, high definition 3D videos one meter in front of the display screen, through the front store window and onto the sidewalk. The system will also be tested as an indoor merchandiser and advertising screen to promote up-selling, launch new products and leverage advertising space in high traffic areas.

We will require significant additional funds to complete our business development. We cannot be certain that funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. To the extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience significant dilution. Any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants that impact our ability to conduct our business. If we are unable to raise additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development and/or commercialization of one or more of our product candidates, restrict our operations or obtain funds by entering into agreements on unattractive terms.

Competition

The competition for ProVision’s patented (issued, approved and pending) and proprietary floating image technology includes alternative 3D projection systems currently in the marketplace.

Fresnel-Based Technology

Competing companies using Fresnel optics in their display systems include Visucom. Such displays are only capable of projecting very narrow viewing angles and “soft” less focused images. This company’s core fresnel-based technology is different in principle and effect than that utilized by ProVision.

●

Visucom: German-based Visucom is an advertising company that produces display systems using traditional Fresnel technology. Visucom offers a 3D image display called “MotionPro” which could be considered competitive to ProVision’s Holo™ line.

Reflective-Based Technology

●

Optical Products Development Corporation (“OPD”) is a company that produces optics and display systems primarily for aerospace, commercial aviation, and other industries requiring high-precision optics. While they also create 3D display systems for communications and advertising, very few of their products have been seen on the market. In addition, their marketing officer recently revealed that they have no product installations in the U.S. However, OPD has recently licensed their technology to Sammy, a Japanese electronics manufacturer.

●

OPD’s only product that offers a 3D image display, which would be considered competitive to ProVision, is called “Volumatrix 3D”. In contrast to Volumatrix, ProVision floating image displays can project images up to 400% further into space, provide 20% wider viewing angels, 80% greater contrast, and higher superior brightness and resolution that is clearly visible. Additionally, the use of videotapes by OPD presents obvious limitations in terms of updating and interfacing content.

Autostereoscopic-Based Technology

ProVision’s floating image display systems project full-motion 3D digital streaming media 9”- 40” into space detached from the display unit into free space and should not be confused with autostereoscopic systems. Autostereoscopic 3D systems produced by various firms layer two or more LCD screens while utilizing filters and collumnators to provide the illusion of depth perception. Such systems are only capable of displaying digital content attached to layered screens with all images being contained within the actual display unit.

·	Phillips is the leading company producing autostereoscopic displays for the retail market. Due to the inherent nature of this technology the end result of their product line results in the following characteristics: eye strain, nausea, low resolution, low brightness and poor quality imagery. Their major advantage might be characterized by their “flat screens” and slightly wider viewing angles.
·	Sharp sells 3D autostereoscopic laptop computers. They launched this product 3 years ago.
·	Deep Light is a two-year old start up company developing autostereoscopic displays.
·	See Real is a 3-year old R&D company located in Germany. They introduced a prototype autostereoscopic display at Infocomm in 2005. · Newsight is a company that sells 3D autostereoscopic displays similar to Phillips, however, they have not been too successful, somewhat or the same reasons as Phillips, as stated above. Newsight has been a company that has been ‘born again’ under various names during its history including X3D, Opticality, 4D Vision, as they’ve continued to seek capital investment for R&D and market launch. Their limitations are the same as Phillips.

Other Displays

IO2 Technology (“IO2”) is a San Francisco technology-based development company exploring future display technologies for corporate customers, which includes one-of-a-kind displays for the defense industry. They in their second generation of “embryonic development”. Their “Heliodisplay” product displays their imagery in mid-air. Heliodisplay ejects “modified air” from the system and is then illuminated to create the floating image. There is a market concern that something is added to the air which will change the room’s environment, air quality or other condition unknown to the user.

Employees

As of September 30, 2009 we have 6 employees. None of our employees is represented by a labor union. We have not experienced any work stoppages and we consider relations with our employees to be good. The company also uses independent contractors to support administration, marketing, sales and field support activities.

Research and Development

Research and Development Activities

At present, Provision’s patents and patent applications are supplemented by substantial intellectual property we are currently protecting as trade secrets and proprietary know-how. This includes matter related to all three product lines. We expect to file additional patent applications on a regular basis in the future.

We believe that Provision’s intellectual property and expertise constitutes an important competitive resource, and we continue to evaluate the markets and products that are most appropriate to exploit this expertise. In addition, we maintain an active program of intellectual property protection, both to assure that the proprietary technology developed by us is appropriately protected and, where necessary, to assure that there is no infringement of Provision’s proprietary technology by competitive technologies.

Research and development expenses for the year ended June 30, 2009 increased 8% to $170,986 from $157,767 for the year ended June 30, 2008. Our research and development expense is primarily related to two key employees that provide specialized services.

Intellectual Property

The following table summarizes the status of ProVision patents and patent applications, copyrights, and trademarks, as of the date hereof, in each instance, ProVision owns all right, title and interest, and no licenses, security interests, or other encumbrances have been granted on such patents, patent applications, copyrights, and trademarks. Our various pending patents involve sets of rules to eliminate boundary transgressions and maximize the clarity of a three dimensional aerial images. Additional patents are focused around various product applications, designs, and systems.

Product

Supported

Patent/

Registration No.

Title

Status

Type

HoloVision	D526, 647	3DEO	Issued	Design patent
HoloVision	D527, 729	3DEO	Issued	Design patent
HoloVision	13226/2004	N/A	Issued	Design patent
HoloVision	D506, 464	Aerial Display System	Issued	Design patent
HoloVision	D505, 948	Aerial Display System	Issued	Design patent
HoloVision	D506, 756	Aerial Display System	Issued	Design patent
HoloVision	6,808,268	Projection system for aerial display	Issued	Utility patent
HoloVision	3,118,432	Promotions You Experience	Issued	Trademark
Corporate	2,706,431	PITI	Issued	Trademark
Corporate	2,699,733	PEI	Issued	Trademark
HoloVision	2,699,732	Holosoft	Issued	Trademark
HoloVision	TXu1-198-776	Coupon Software	Issued	Copyright
HoloVision	VAu628-125	Coupon GUI	Issued	Copyright
HoloVision	TXu1-180-982	HoloSoft	Issued	Copyright
HoloVision	60/984,340	HLXX	Pending (provisional)	Utility patent
HoloVision	PCT/US07/76554	Plastic Mirror Methods	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	PCT/US07/76574	Aerial Display Systems with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	PCT/US07/76572	Apparatus with Aerial with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	PCT/US07/76568	Apparatus for Image with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	PCT/US07/76566	Aerial Image Display with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	PCT/US07/76361	Projection System with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	11/843,109	Plastic Mirror Methods	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	11/843,144	Aerial Display Systems with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	11/843,139	Apparatus with Aerial with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	11/843,134	Apparatus for Image with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	11/843,125	Aerial Image Display with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	11/843,115	Projection System with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	N/A	Apparatus for image	Pending	Utility patent (divisional)
HoloVision	200620136608.8	Aerial Display Systems with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	200620136607.3	Apparatus with Aerial with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	200620137112.2	Apparatus for Image with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	200620136605.4	Aerial Image Displaywith Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	200620136604.X	Projection System with Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent

Product Supported	Patent/ Registration No.	Title	Status	Type
HoloVision	60/839,740	Low Cost Plastic Optic	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	78/917,316	Built with Technology	Pending	Trademark
HoloVision	78/917,306	Technology	Pending	Trademark
HoloVision	78/917,286	Holocasting	Pending	Trademark
HoloVision	78/663,888	HoloMedia	Pending	Trademark
HoloVision	29/260,118	3DEO	Pending	Design patent
HoloVision	78/615,380	3DEO Rewards Program	Pending	Trademark
HoloVision	78/615,364	3DEO	Pending	Trademark
HoloVision	11/105,857	Aerial Display System	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	11/059,575	Coupon/Product Dispensing Kiosk	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	PCT/US03/25506	Projection system for aerial display	Pending	Utility patent
HoloVision	N/A	Holovision	Allowed	Common law trademark

At present, our patents and patent applications are supplemented by substantial intellectual property we are currently protecting as trade secrets and proprietary know-how. This includes matter related to all three product lines. We expect to file additional patent applications on a regular basis in the future.

We believe that our intellectual property and expertise constitutes an important competitive resource, and we continue to evaluate the markets and products that are most appropriate to exploit this expertise. In addition, we maintain an active program of intellectual property protection, both to assure that the proprietary technology developed by us is appropriately protected and, where necessary, to assure that there is no infringement of our proprietary technology by competitive technologies.

We rely on a combination of patent, patent pending, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, proprietary rights agreements and non-disclosure agreements to protect our intellectual properties. We cannot give any assurance that these measures will prove to be effective in protecting our intellectual properties. We also cannot give any assurance that our existing patents will not be invalidated, that any patents that we currently or prospectively apply for will be granted, or that any of these patents will ultimately provide significant commercial benefits. Further, competing companies may circumvent any patents that we may hold by developing products which closely emulate but do not infringe our patents. While we intend to seek patent protection for our products in selected foreign countries, those patents may not receive the same degree of protection as they would in the United States. We can give no assurance that we will be able to successfully defend our patents and proprietary rights in any action we may file for patent infringement. Similarly, we cannot give any assurance that we will not be required to defend against litigation involving the patents or proprietary rights of others, or that we will be able to obtain licenses for these rights. Legal and accounting costs relating to prosecuting or defending patent infringement litigation may be substantial.

We also rely on proprietary designs, technologies, processes and know-how not eligible for patent protection. We cannot give any assurance that our competitors will not independently develop the same or superior designs, technologies, processes and know-how.

While we have and will continue to enter into proprietary rights agreements with our employees and third parties giving us proprietary rights to certain technology developed by those employees or parties while engaged by us, we can give no assurance that courts of competent jurisdiction will enforce those agreements.

Item 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

The Company is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and is not required to provide the information required under this item.

An investment in the our common stock involves a high degree of risk. In determining whether to purchase our common stock, an investor should carefully consider all of the material risks described below, together with the other information contained in this report before making a decision to purchase our securities. An investor should only purchase our securities if he or she can afford to suffer the loss of his or her entire investment.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES.

Our principal executive offices are located at 9253 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California 91311. The offices consist of approximately 7,500 square feet, which are leased on a month to month basis for approximately $6,200 per month for rent and related costs. We believe that our properties are adequate for our current and immediately foreseeable operating needs. We do not have any policies regarding investments in real estate, securities or other forms of property.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

There are no material legal proceedings, to our knowledge, pending against us or being pursued by us.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Our common stock is listed on the OTC Bulletin Board, under the symbol “PVHO” The following table sets forth the high and low bid and offer prices, as provided by OTCBB for the quarters in fiscal years 2009 and 2008:

	FISCAL YEAR				FISCAL YEAR
	2009				2008
	HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW
1st Quarter	$	2.80	$	0.55	$	4.04	$	4.04
2nd Quarter	$	1.00	$	0.05	$	4.04	$	0.10
3rd Quarter	$	0.40	$	0.06	$	1.84	$	1.00
4th Quarter	$	0.24	$	0.08	$	1.80	$	0.90

There was no trading activity, other than one trade of 125 shares between July 1, 2007 and February 28, 2008, the effective date of our reverse merger. There is currently irregular trading in our common stock. Our stock price may fluctuate dramatically in the future in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control:

As of November 12, 2009, there were approximately 530 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock. We currently intend to retain future earnings, if any, to finance the expansion of its business. As a result, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table shows information with respect to each equity compensation plan under which our common stock is authorized for issuance as of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Plan category

Number of securities

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

Weighted average

exercise price of outstanding options,

warrants and rights

Number of securities

remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

3,212,472

1.50

1,047,197

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

N/A

Total

3,212,472

1.50

1,047,197

Pursuant to the Agreement, an option to purchase a share of common stock of ProVision was automatically converted into an option to purchase two shares of our common stock.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” which can be identified by the use of terminology such as “estimates,” “projects,” “plans,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” or the negative or other variations, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. We urge you to be cautious of the forward-looking statements, that such statements, which are contained in this Form 10-Q, reflect our current beliefs with respect to future events and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors affecting our operations, market growth, services, products and licenses. No assurances can be given regarding the achievement of future results, as actual results may differ materially as a result of the risks we face, and actual events may differ from the assumptions underlying the statements that have been made regarding anticipated events. Factors that may cause actual results, our performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include without limitation:

·	Our ability to attract and retain management, and to integrate and maintain technical information and management information systems;

·	Our ability to raise capital when needed and on acceptable terms and conditions;

·	The intensity of competition; and

·	General economic conditions.

All written and oral forward-looking statements made in connection with this Form 10-K that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Given the uncertainties that surround such statements, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

Business Overview

On February 14, 2008, MailTec, Inc. (now known as Provision Holding, Inc.) (the “Company”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, which was amended and restated on February 27, 2008 (as amended and restated, the “Agreement”), and closed effective February 28, 2008, with ProVision Merger Corp., a Nevada corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Subsidiary”) and Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc., a California corporation (“Provision”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Subsidiary merged into Provision, and Provision became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. As consideration for the merger of the Subsidiary into Provision, the Company issued 20,879,350 shares of the Company’s common stock to the shareholders, creditors, and certain warrant holders of Provision, representing approximately 86.5% of the Company’s aggregate issued and outstanding common stock, and the outstanding shares and debt, and those warrants whose holders received shares of the Company’s common stock, of Provision were transferred to the Company and cancelled.

The Company and Provision are focused on the development and distribution of Provision’s patented three-dimensional, holographic interactive displays focused at grabbing and holding consumer attention particularly and initially in the advertising and product merchandising markets. The systems display a moving 3D image size to forty inches in front of the display, projecting a digital video image out into space detached from any screen, rendering truly independent floating images featuring high definition and crisp visibility from far distances. The nearest comparable to this technology can be seen in motion pictures such as Star Wars and Minority Report, where objects and humans are represented through full-motion holograms.

We are also developing and marketing several new point-of-purchase, and other devices, tailored to specific industries that are currently in Pilot Programs with major international companies or readying to begin shortly; including the medical, entertainment, government and home markets. In addition to selling the hardware for our patented three-dimensional, holographic interactive video displays, we are building our business into a digital media company offering advertising on a network of our 3D holographic video displays.

One of our new products is known as the “HL40 Diamond”, an extraordinary 3D holographic video display system, to the retailing and advertising industries is smaller and lighter than its predecessor, the HL40C. Used to promote all type of products and services, the HL40D is a powerful tool to break through the clutter of traditional in store advertising and merchandising. Our other powerful 3D products can be used for a wide variety of interactive applications including order-taking and information retrieval.

Significant Events and Trends

Our floating image display technologies have multiple market applications across a broad spectrum of industries. Extensive audience migration across and within media categories is driving major shifts in advertising spending, benefiting captive, auditable media vehicles. Traditional media vehicles like radio, TV, newspapers and magazines continue to lose audience share and advertising dollars to new media vehicles, which include the point-of-purchase or wherever there might be a captive audience. The current media and traditional displays (TV, LCD and Plasma screens) are stale and ubiquitous resulting in significant ineffectiveness.

Launching our first products into grocery stores, we have developed a new patent pending application. Known as the “3DEO Rewards Center” or “3DEO”, this device projects 3D video advertisements and allows consumers to print coupons as well as receive non-cash awards. The 3DEO device provides food companies and other advertisers with a new way of promoting their products at the point of purchase, where consumers are making seventy percent of their buying decisions.

In June 2008, we announced our signed three-year agreement with Fred Meyer Stores, a division of The Kroger, Co., to install Fred Meyer 3DEO Centers in 127 locations in the Pacific Northwest. Installation of the centers will begin this month in Portland, OR, in high traffic, high visibility locations close to the main entrance of the store. We have received advertising placements from some of the largest manufacturers in the country, including Unilever, Proctor & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, BIC and Kimberly Clark. The manufacturers’ will advertise through digital coupons that customers will receive from Provision’s 3DEO Media Centers located in Fred Meyer stores.

In September 2008, we signed an agreement with the Long Island Gasoline Retailers Association (“LIGRA”) to install its patented 3D holographic displays in up to 800 member stores throughout New York. Provision’s displays will be located inside the independent convenience stores of major franchise gasoline retailers including Shell, ExxonMobil, Citgo, Sunoco, BP, Amoco and Gulf.

In December 2008, we signed an agreement with ADCENTRICITY Inc. to sell advertising on its revolutionary 3D digital signage network. ADCENTRICITIY's advertisers will be able to feature their messaging on Provision's extraordinary network in a variety of forms, including 3D holographic videos and digital coupons.

We are still working with one of the world’s largest coffee franchises to test a variety of in-store digital signage applications utilizing Provision’s HL40D displays. Once successful, Provision will install up to 109 systems in the quick service chain’s greater New York City area stores.

We also have continued hardware sales of our patented three-dimensional, holographic interactive video displays. In July 2008, we began shipments to Studio One Media, Inc. of up to 1,000 3D holographic units pursuant to a Strategic Alliance and Purchase Agreement. The contract will generate up to $7 million dollars in revenue for Provision over the next 18 months.

Research and Development Activities

Results of Operation – Year Ended June 30, 2009 as Compared to the Year Ended June 30, 2008

Select Financial Information
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008
Total Assets	$	1,093,071		$	1,421,022
Total Liabilities	$	3,114,807		$	1,839,218
Total Stockholders’ Deficit	$	2,021,736		$	418,196

Revenues	$	438,772		$	529,301
Cost of Revenues		234,310			290,292
Gross Profit		204,462			239,009
Expenses		1,987,719			2,906,228
Loss from Operations		(1,783,257	)		(2,667,219	)
Other Income (Expense)		(701,581	)		(2,335,524	)
Net Loss	$	(2,486,438	)	$	(5,005,943	)
Net Loss per Common Share	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.20	)

Revenue and Cost of Revenue

Revenues for the year ended June 30, 2009 decreased 17% to $438,772 from $529,301 for the year ended June 30, 2008. Included in revenues for the year ended June 30, 2009 is $403,392 from the sale of our product coming from international distributors and the beginning shipment of our Studio One purchase agreement as well as $35,450 in advertising revenues. These international product sales came in from countries including Japan and Europe. The Company has announced additional sales to its Japanese distributor supporting the test of the Company’s products by Unisys, as well as recent shipments to the U.K. to its distributor who is working with Samsung. Advertising sales are expected to increase as the Company continues its roll out of its 3D Reward Center in the large top demographic markets of Los Angeles (#2) and New York (#1).We have entered into several agreements with media buying agencies and ad agencies to assist in the selling of 3D holographic ads and coupon promotions; expecting to continue the growth of ad sales on a quarter by quarter basis.

Our cost of revenues were $234,310 for the year ended June 30, 2009 as compared to $290,292 for the year ended June 30, 2008. This decrease of $55,982 or 11% is a direct result of our decreased revenues as well as the increase in advertising revenue which carries no cost of revenue.

We had a gross profit percentage of 47% for the year ended June 30, 2009 compared to a gross profit percentage of 45% for the year ended June 30, 2008. The increase in gross margin percentage was a result of a change in our sales mixture to higher margin items, increase in some sales prices to certain regional, retail customers, along with our additional advertising revenues. As discussed above, we expect advertising revenues to increase in the coming quarters as the Company begins to roll out its 3D Reward Center in the large top demographic markets of Los Angeles (#2) and New York (#1).

Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the year ended June 30, 2009 were $1,816,733 as compared to $2,748,461 for the year ended June 30, 2008.

During the year ended June 30, 2009 our legal fees decreased $136,015 to $63,936 from $199,951 during the year ended June 30, 2008. This decrease is the result of the completion of our merger in February 2008 and less need for legal services during 2009. We also experienced a decrease in our marketing expense of $63,458 to $123,094 for the year ended June 30, 2009 from $186,552 during the year ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in our marketing expenses was due to our decision to not reorder approximately $60,000 of marketing materials that were ordered and used during the year ended June 30, 2008. Additionally, our salaries and wages decreased $237,884 to $418,555 during the year ended June 30, 2009 from $656,439 during the year ended June 30, 2008. This decrease is due to our employee base decreasing to six employees from nine employees. We don’t currently have plans to replace the departed employees until sales and gross profits increase. We also experienced a decrease of $918,816 in non-cash compensation to $362,500 during the year ended June 30, 2009 from $1,218,316 during the year ended June 30, 2008. Non-cash compensation relates to the value of common stock, warrants and options issued in exchange for services rendered. While we cannot guarantee it, we do not expect our non-cash compensation to continue this level of increase in the near future. Our consulting expenses also decreased $508,392 to $43,397 during the year ended June 30, 2009 from $551,789 during the year ended June 30, 2008. These decreases in expenses were partially offset by an increase of $98,553 in our accounting fees to $184,830 during the year ended June 30, 2009 from $86,277 during the year ended June 30, 2008. This increase in accounting fees is directly related to our financial statement audit for the year ended June 30, 2008 as well as the requirement for quarterly reviewed financial statements to fulfill our filing requirements with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

During the year ended June 30, 2009 we recorded $170,986 of research and development expenses as compared to $157,767 during the year ended June 30, 2008. Research and development expenses relate to the salary paid to two key employees who conduct ongoing technical engineering tasks for product improvements, cost reductions, new product development, and the like.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest expense decreased 71% to $704,306 during the year ended June 30, 2009 from $2,402,724 during the year ended June 30, 2008. The decrease is directly related to the decrease in the beneficial conversion feature interest expense related to the issuance of new debt and the discount the note holder experiences.

During the year ended June 30, 2009 we recorded $3,000 unrealized loss of securities as we revalued the carrying value of our investment in corporate stock held as well as a $5,725 gain on the disposal of a fixed asset.

During the year ended June 30, 2008 we recorded $14,000 unrealized loss of securities as we revalued the carrying value of our investment in corporate stock held as well as a $81,200 of debt forgiveness related to our line of credit that was renegotiated with the bank and a note payable balance being forgiven.

Net Loss

As a result of the aforementioned, our net loss decreased 50% or $2,519,505, to $2,486,438 during the year ended June 30, 2009 from $5,005,943 during the year ended June 30, 2008.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

Management remains focused on controlling cash expenses. We have limited cash resources and plan our expenses accordingly.

We had cash of $19,339 at June 30, 2009 compared to cash of $287,641 at June 30, 2008. Our working capital deficit increased to $2,543,076 at June 30, 2009 from a deficit of $1,002,346 at June 30, 2008. The reason for the increase in the working capital deficit was the decrease in our cash and inventory of approximately $265,000 and $100,000, respectively, along with the increase in our accounts payable and accrued expenses and our accrued interest of approximately $300,000 and $245,000 respectively.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, we used $847,473 of cash for operating activities versus $1,647,199 during the year ended June 30, 2008. The primary difference was the reduction of liabilities and purchases of inventory in 2009 and the increase in accrued interest during 2008 on the increased debt.

Cash used in investing activities during the year ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $80,579 and $435,679, respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2009, we used $40,990 to purchase additional equipment to support our infrastructure and $39,589 to secure additional patents. During the year ended June 30, 2008 we used $435,679 to purchase equipment.

Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended June 30, 2009 was $659,750 as a result of the proceeds from notes payable net of fees. Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended June 30, 2008 was $1,140,541 as a result of the proceeds from notes payable, net of fees, in the amount of $1,485,000 offset by the repayment of notes payable totaling $344,459.

Given our plans and expectation that we will need additional capital, we will need to issue additional shares of capital stock or securities convertible or exercisable for shares of capital stock, including preferred stock, options or warrants. The issuance of additional capital stock may dilute the ownership of the current stockholders.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not engage in any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, and liquidity or capital expenditures.

Critical Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and timing of revenues and expenses, the reported amounts and classification of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates and assumptions are based on the Company’s historical results as well as management’s future expectations. The Company’s actual results could vary materially from management’s estimates and assumptions.

Revenue Recognition — We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, title transfer has occurred, the price is fixed or readily determinable, and collectability is probable. We recognize revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition." Sales are recorded net of sales returns and discounts, which are estimated at the time of shipment based upon historical data.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets — We review the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets using the methodology prescribed in SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Upon such an occurrence, recoverability of these assets is determined by comparing the forecasted undiscounted net cash flows to which the assets relate, to the carrying amount. If the asset is determined to be unable to recover its carrying value, it is written down to fair value. Fair value is determined based on discounted cash flows, appraised values or other information available in the market, depending on the nature of the assets. Methodologies for determining fair value are inherently based on estimates that may change, such as the useful lives of assets and our cash flow forecasts associated with certain assets. A change in these estimates may result in impairment charges, which would impact our operating results.

Going Concern

These financial statements are presented on the basis that the Company is a going concern. Going concern contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable length of time. The Company has incurred a loss of approximately $2,500,000 in the current period and has negative working capital of approximately $2,500,000. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to obtain additional financing or refinancing as may be required and, ultimately, to attain profitable operations. Management's plan to eliminate the going concern situation include, but are not limited to, the raise of additional capital through issuance of debt and equity, improved cash flow management, aggressive cost reductions, and the creation of additional sales and profits across its product lines.

Accounting for Stock Option Based Compensation

Effective July 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment: An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95" using the modified prospective method. Under this method, compensation cost is recognized on or after the effective date for the portion of outstanding awards, for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered, based on the grant date fair value of those awards. Prior to July 1, 2006, the Company accounted for employee stock options using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 (APB No. 25), "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and adopted the disclosure only alternative of SFAS No. 123. For stock-based awards issued on or after July 1, 2006, the Company recognizes the compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Measurement and attribution of compensation cost for awards that are unvested as of the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) are based on the same estimate of the grant-date or modification-date fair value and the same attribution method used under SFAS No. 123.

On November 10, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3 "Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards". The Company has elected to adopt the alternative transition method provided in the FASB Staff Position for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R). The alternative transition method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). As the Company is currently in a net operating loss position and has placed valuation allowances on its net deferred tax assets, there is no net impact on the Company's APIC pool related to stock-based compensation for the year ended June 30, 2009.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (“SFAS No. 157”) for all financial assets and financial liabilities and for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements, and the resulting fair values calculated under SFAS No. 157 after adoption were not significantly different than the fair values that would have been calculated under previous guidance.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (ASC 825) . SFAS 159 permits companies to measure certain financial instruments and other items at fair value. We have not elected the fair value option applicable under SFAS 159.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" ("SFAS No. 162"). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. SFAS No. 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of, Present fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles". The Company does not believe the implementation of SFAS No. 162 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Financial Staff Position 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active, (“FSP 157-3”). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not active, and addresses application issues such as the use of internal assumptions when relevant observable data does not exist, the use of observable market information when the market is not active, and the use of market quotes when assessing the relevance of observable and unobservable data. FSP 157-3 is effective for all periods presented in accordance with SFAS No. 157. The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements or the fair values of our financial assets and liabilities.

In December 2008, the FASB issued Financial Staff Position (“FSP”) Financial Accounting Standard No. 140-4 and FASB Interpretation 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities (“FSP FAS 140-4” and “FIN 46(R)-8”). The document increases disclosure requirements for public companies and is effective for reporting periods (interim and annual) that end after December 15, 2008. FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 became effective for us on December 31, 2008. The adoption of FSP FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8 did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (ASC 820). FSP 107-1 amends SFAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value Instruments and APB 28, Interim Financial Reporting (ASC 820), to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments during interim reporting periods. The Company will adopt the provisions of FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 during the quarter ended September 30, 2009.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS 165 also requires the disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and the basis for that date. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 165 during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Our financial statements and related financial notes, together with the report from Farber Hass Hurley LLP, are set forth immediately following the signature page to this report.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

Not Applicable

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our principal executive and principal financial officers have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. They have concluded that, based on such evaluation, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2009, as further described below.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Overview

Internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (“COSO”) of the Treadway Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Assessment

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and we are required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures.

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and we are required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures.

Our management has evaluated the ongoing effectiveness of our design and operation of our controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009, and identified the following weaknesses:

Resources: We have limited number of personnel with requisite expertise in the key functional areas of finance and accounting.

Written Policies & Procedures: We need to prepare written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting.

Audit Committee: We do not have, and are not required, to have an audit committee. An audit committee would improve oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures.

Management is committed to improving its internal controls and will (1) continue to use third party specialists to address shortfalls in staffing and to assist the Company with accounting and finance responsibilities, (2) increase the frequency of independent reconciliations of significant accounts which will mitigate the lack of segregation of duties until there are sufficient personnel and (3) prepare and implement sufficient written policies and checklists for financial reporting and closing processes and (4) may consider appointing an audit committee comprised of both management and outside board members in the future.

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer, has discussed internal controls with our independent registered public accounting firm.

Based upon this evaluation, our CEO has concluded that, without third-party specialists, our current disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information required to be included in our periodic SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to our senior management, including our CEO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Management’s report is not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Our executive officers, directors and significant employees and their ages and their respective positions as of November 2, 2009 were as follows:

Name	Age	Position
Curt Thornton	53	Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, President, and Director
Robert Ostrander	55	Vice President, Sales, Business Development, Secretary and Director
Jeff Vrachan	54	Vice President, Engineering and Chief Technology Officer, and Director
Jon Corfino	50	Director

Officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors (subject to the terms of any employment agreement), at our annual meeting, to hold such office until an officer’s successor has been duly appointed and qualified, unless an officer sooner dies, resigns or is removed by the Board.

Background of Executive Officers and Directors

Curt Thornton

Curt Thornton has been chief executive officer, president, chairman and a director of the Company since Mach 2008. Mr. Thornton is the founder of ProVision and has been chief executive officer, president, chairman and director of ProVision since our inception in December 2000. Mr. Thornton has over 20 years of international executive experience in operations, manufacturing, engineering and sales driven companies. He has held senior executive positions at Iwerks Entertainment Corp., Northern Telecom and Tandon Computers. Mr. Thornton earned an MBA from Pepperdine University and a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering from Western Illinois University.

Robert Ostrander

Robert Ostrander has been Vice President, Sales, Business Development, secretary, and a director of the Company since March 2008. Mr. Ostrander has been President, Sales, Marketing, Business Development, secretary, and a director for ProVision since March 2001.

Mr. Ostrander has 20 years of sales and business development experience, both domestic and international. He has held senior positions in sales at Allied Domecq, Kraft Foods, Sara Lee and Welch Foods. He holds an MBA from Pepperdine University, and a B.S. from the State University of New York.

Jeff Vrachan

Jeff Vrachan has been Vice President Engineering, Chief Technology Officer, and a director of the Company since March 2008. Mr. Vrachan has been Vice President Engineering and Chief Technology Officer, and a director of ProVision since our inception in December 2000.

Prior to joining Provision, Mr. Vrachan served as a Project Manager, Engineering Manager and Operations Manager for high-tech companies such as Allied Signal, Mitsubishi Electronics and Southwestern Industries. Mr. Vrachan has a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of California and a second Bachelor’s degree in Business Management from the University of Phoenix.

Jon Corfino

Jonathan Corfino has been a director of the Company since March 2008. Mr. Corfino has been a director of ProVision since 2003. Mr. Corfino is a senior executive with 20 years experience in the theme park, location-based and interactive entertainment industry. Mr. Corfino is the founder of Attraction Media & Entertainment, Inc. and has been its chief executive officer since 2001. Mr. Corfino was president, location-based entertainment for Stan Lee Media, Inc. from 1999 to 2000. He was senior vice president in charge of production at Iwerks Entertainment, from 1993 to 1999, where he supervised the production and/or acquisition of over 30 specialty films for Simulation, Attraction and Large Format venues. Prior to Iwerks, from 1978 to 1991, Mr. Corfino worked in the Planning and Development group at MCA/Universal as a Project Manager. He was directly involved in the creative development and construction of a variety of projects and attractions, including "The Star Trek Adventure", "Back to the Future - The Ride”, "ET the Extraterrestrial" and studio center expansion plus special effects stages. Mr. Corfino holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from UCLA.

Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws.

Our executive officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.

Significant Employees

We have no significant employees other than our officers and directors.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, during the past five years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present director, person nominated to become director, executive officer, or control person: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

Audit Committee

We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee. The entire board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the board of directors when performing the functions of that would generally be performed by an audit committee. The board of directors approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the board of directors reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent auditor.

We do not have an audit committee financial expert because of the size of our company and our board of directors at this time. We believe that we do not require an audit committee financial expert at this time because we retain outside consultants who possess these attributes. .

Nominating Committee

We do not have a nominating committee. The board of directors acts as the nominating committee and members of the board participate in the discussions. If the size of the board expands, the board will reconsider the need or desirability of a nominating committee.

Compensation Committee

We do not have a compensation committee. If the size of the board expands, the board will reconsider the need or desirability of a compensation committee.

For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009, the board of directors:

1.	Reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, and

2.	Reviewed and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from our independent auditors on the matters relating to the auditor's independence.

Based upon the board of directors’ review and discussion of the matters above, the board of directors authorized inclusion of the audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2009 to be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Code of Ethics Disclosure

We adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Executives, which include our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The code of ethics was filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC on July 14, 2006.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following table sets forth all compensation paid in respect of ProVision’s Chief Executive Officer and those individuals who received compensation in excess of $100,000 per year (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers") for the last three completed fiscal years.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name & Principal Position	Fiscal Year Ended June 30,	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Curt Thornton	2009	$	140,000	0		0	0		0	0	$	140,000
Chief Executive Officer	2008	$	144,000	0		299,600	0		0	0	$	443,600
and Director	2007	$	144,000	0		0	0		0	0	$	144,000


Robert Ostrander	2009	$	125,000	0		0	0		0	0	$	125,000
Vice President, Sales,Business Development	2008	$	125,000	0		214,000	0		0	0	$	339,000
	2007	$	125,000	0		0	0		0	0	$	125,000


Jeff Vrachan Vice President Engineering and	2009	$	125,000	0		0	0		0	0	$	125,000
Chief Technology Officer	2008	$	125,000	0		0	0		0	0	$	125,000
	2007	$	125,000	0		0	0		0	0	$	125,000

Employment Agreements

We are party to an employment agreement with Curt Thornton, dated May 30, 2006, pursuant to which Mr. Thornton serves as our chief executive officer, president and chairman. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Thornton receives a minimum annual base salary of $144,000, subject to increases in the sole discretion of our board of directors. Mr. Thornton is also eligible to receive an annual cash bonus in an amount determined by the board of directors, and is eligible to participate in ProVision’s annual equity participation program. The agreement has a term of five years, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms thereof. ProVision may terminate the agreement for cause. If ProVision terminates the agreement without cause, Mr. Thornton will receive one year’s annual salary for each full year of employment completed, the amount of the previous year’s bonus, and continuance of medical/dental benefits for a period of one year.

We are party to an employment agreement with Robert Ostrander, dated May 30, 2006, pursuant to which Mr. Ostrander serves as our vice president. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Ostrander receives a minimum annual base salary of $125,000, subject to increases in the sole discretion of our board of directors. Mr. Ostrander is also eligible to receive an annual cash bonus in an amount determined by the board of directors, and is eligible to participate in ProVision’s annual equity participation program. The agreement has a term of five years, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms thereof. ProVision may terminate the agreement for cause.

We are party to an employment agreement with Jeff Vrachan, dated May 30, 2006, pursuant to which Mr. Vrachan serves as our vice president. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Vrachan receives a minimum annual base salary of $125,000, subject to increases in the sole discretion of our board of directors. Mr. Vrachan is also eligible to receive an annual cash bonus in an amount determined by the board of directors, and is eligible to participate in ProVision’s annual equity participation program. The agreement has a term of five years, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms thereof. ProVision may terminate the agreement for cause.

Director Compensation

No director of ProVision received any compensation for services as director for the year ended June 30, 2009.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth certain information, as of November 2, 2009 with respect to the beneficial ownership of the outstanding common stock by (i) any holder of more than five (5%) percent; (ii) each of our executive officers and directors; and (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders listed below has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned.

Name of Beneficial Owner (1)	Common Stock Beneficially Owned			Percentage of Common Stock (2)
Curt Thornton		6,865,200	(3)	25.94	%
Robert Ostrander		2,500,000	(4)	9.44	%
Jeff Vrachan		2,440,000		9.22	%
Jon Corfino		200,000		0.76	%
Catalpa Enterprises, Ltd. 155 Edgehill Dr. Kitchener Ontario Canada N2P2C6		3,394,800		12.83	%

All officers and directors as a group (4 persons owning stock)		11,465,200		45.36	%

	(1)	Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Provision Holding, Inc. 9253 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California 91311.

	(2)	Applicable percentage ownership is based on 24,206,353 shares of common stock outstanding as of November 2, 2009, together with securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock within 60 days of November 2, 2009for each stockholder. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of November 2, 2009are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

	(3)	Includes 140,000 shares receivable upon exercise of a warrant.

	(4)	Includes 100,000 shares receivable upon exercise of a warrant.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

None.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

Our financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 were audited by Farber Hass Hurley LLP (“Farber Hass Hurley”).

Since we do not have a formal audit committee, our board of directors serves as our audit committee. We have not adopted pre-approval policies and procedures with respect to our accountants. All of the services provided and fees charged by our independent registered accounting firms were approved by the board of directors.

Services rendered by Farber Hass Hurley

The following is a summary of the fees for professional services rendered by Farber Hass Hurley for the year ended June 30, 2009.

Fee Category
Audit fees	$	163,780
Audit-related fees
Tax fees
Other fees
Total Fees	$	163,780

Audit fees. Audit fees represent fees for professional services performed by Farber Hass Hurley LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial statements, as well as services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-related fees. We did not incur any other fees for services performed by Farber Hass Hurley LLP, other than the services covered in "Audit Fees" for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.

Tax Fees. We did not incur any fees for tax services performed by Farber Hass Hurley LLP.

Other fees. Farber Hass Hurley LLP did not receive any other fees during 2009.

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of MailTec, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008)
3.2		Restated Bylaws of Provision Holding, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008)
10.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among MailTec, Inc., ProVision Merger Corp and Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. (previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No.1 to Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2008)
10.2		Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among MailTec, Inc., ProVision Merger Corp and Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. (previously filed as an exhibit to Amendment No. 2 to Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2008)
10.3		Employment Agreement, dated May 30, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Curt Thornton (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.4		Employment Agreement, dated May 30, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Robert Ostrander (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.5		Employment Agreement, dated May 30, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Jeff Vrachan (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.6		Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.8		Joint Venture Contract, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Guoshengruiming Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.9		International Distributor Agreement, dated August 7, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Datavoice Solutions Corporation (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.10		Distributor Agreement, dated July 7, 2005, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and National Data Japan Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.14		International Distributor Agreement, dated June 26, 2007, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Nam Tien New Technology Joint Stock Company (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.15		Marketing Agreement, dated February 28, 2007, by and between Intel Corporation and Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.16		International Distributor Agreement, dated July 21, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and 3 Boyut Tanitim Ve Refklamcilik Hizmetler (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.17		International Distributor Agreement, dated July 22, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Beyaz Ileisim Teknolojileri Yazihm Insaat Sanayi Ve Dis Ticaret Limited Sirketi (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.20		International Distributor Agreement, dated June 20, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Trendform Ou (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.21		International Distributor Agreement, dated July 3, 2007, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Mas Dimensiones Sociedad Cooperativa De Responsabilidad Limitada (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.22		International Distributor Agreement, dated June 26, 2007, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Nam Tien New Technology Joint Stock Company (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.24		Strategic Alliance and Purchase Agreement, dated October 19, 2006, by and among Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc., Studio One Media, Inc., and Xtreme Technologies and Media Groups, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.25		Sales and Marketing Agreement, dated February 1, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and The Benites Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.26		Sales and Marketing Agreement, dated November 9, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Kimmelman Neil Group (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
10.30		Sales and Marketing Agreement, dated October 27, 2006, by and between Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. and Wonderworks Media Limited (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
16.1		Letter from Jasper & Hill, PC, dated April 30, 2008 (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2008)
21		List of Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)\15d-14(a)
32.1		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
99.1		Pro forma financial information (incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008).

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

Dated: November 12, 2009	By:	/s/ Curt Thornton
		Name: Curt Thornton
		Title: Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on November 12, 2009, on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities Indicated.

Signature	Title

/s/ Curt Thornton	Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board, President and Director
Curt Thornton	(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Robert Ostrander	Vice President, Sales, Business Development,
Robert Ostrander	Secretary and Director

/s/ Jeff Vrachan	Vice President, Engineering,
Jeff Vrachan	Chief Technology Officer and Director

/s/ Jon Corfino	Director
Jon Corfino

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF PROVISION HOLDING, INC.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Provision Holding, Inc. (the "Company") as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in the notes to the financial statements, the Company has incurred significant losses in 2009 and 2008 and has negative working capital of approximately $2,500,000. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Farber Hass Hurley LLP

Camarillo, California

November 12, 2009

F - 1

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

	2009			2008

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash	$	19,339		$	287,641
Accounts receivable		-			-
Inventory		222,712			322,793
Prepaid expenses		106,875			-
Investments		3,000			6,000

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		351,926			616,434

EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation		472,715			541,568

PREPAID FINANCING COSTS		93,781			125,464

INTANGIBLES, net of accumulated amortization		174,649			137,556

TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,093,071		$	1,421,022

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	599,835		$	299,152
Accrued interest		571,417			325,495
Unearned revenue		71,557			-
Loss contingency payable		592,312			592,312
Current portion of convertible debt, net of debt discount of $568,119		921,881
Notes payable		138,000			401,821

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		2,895,002			1,618,780

CONVERTIBLE DEBT, net of current portion and debt discount of $1,235,195		219,805			220,438

TOTAL LIABILITIES		3,114,807			1,839,218

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share
Authorized – 4,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding – 0 shares		-			-
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share
Authorized – 100,000,000 shares
Issued and outstanding – 26,465,372 and 24,446,353, respectively		26,465			24,446
Additional paid-in capital		12,198,454			11,317,575
Less receivable for stock		(50,000	)		(50,000	)
Accumulated deficit		(14,196,655	)		(11,710,217	)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT		(2,021,736	)		(418,196	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	$	1,093,071		$	1,421,022

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F - 2

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

	2009			2008

REVENUES	$	438,772		$	529,301

COST OF REVENUES		234,310			290,292

GROSS PROFIT		204,462			239,009

EXPENSES
General and administrative		1,816,733			2,748,461
Research and development		170,986			157,767

TOTAL EXPENSES		1,987,719			2,906,228

(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		(1,783,257	)		(2,667,219	)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Unrealized loss on securities		(3,000	)		(14,000	)
Gain on disposal of fixed asset		5,725			-
Forgiveness of debt		-			81,200
Interest expense		(704,306	)		(2,402,724	)

TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)		(701,581	)		(2,335,524	)

(LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(2,484,838	)		(5,002,743	)

Income tax expense		1,600			3,200


NET (LOSS)		(2,486,438	)		(5,005,943	)

NET (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Basic and diluted		(0.10	)		(0.20	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING

Basic and diluted		25,101,493			24,446,353

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F - 3

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

	Common Stock
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital		Receivable for Stock			Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders’ Deficit

Balance, June 30, 2007 (as restated)		21,364,312	$	21,364	$	6,071,534		-		$	(6,704,274	)	$	(611,376	)

Issuance of common stock for debt		1,675,000		1,675		1,673,325					-			1,675,000

Issuance of common stock for
interest expense		87,174		87		87,087					-			87,174

Issuance of common stock for
services		319,867		320		595,780					-			596,100

Conversion of options		1,000,000		1,000		216,875					-			217,875

Issuance of stock options		-		-		549,841					-			549,841

Debt discount		-		-		2,123,133					-			2,123,133

Net (loss) for the year
Ended June 30, 2008		-		-		-					(5,005,943	)		(5,005,943	)

Balance, June 30, 2008		24,446,353	$	24,446	$	11,317,575	$	(50,000	)	$	(11,710,217	)	$	(418,196	)

Issuance of common stock for
Services		2,019,019		2,019		430,656					-			432,675

Non-cash compensation		-		-		43,266					-			43,266

Debt discount		-		-		406,957					-			406,957

Net (loss) for the year
Ended June 30, 2009		-		-		-					(2,486,438	)		(2,486,438	)

Balance, June 30, 2009		26,465,372	$	26,465	$	12,198,454	$	(50,000	)	$	(14,196,655	)	$	(2,021,736	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F - 4

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

	2009			2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss)	$	(2,486,438	)	$	(5,005,943	)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash
(used) by operating activities:
Non-cash compensation		36,700			1,281,316
Forgiveness of debt		-			(81,200	)
Stock issued for services		325,800			82,500
Depreciation expense		115,568			17,681
Amortization		2,496			1,944
Gain on disposal of fixed asset		(5,725	)		-
Unrealized loss on securities		3,000			14,000
Amortization of debt discount		342,950			1,953,507
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		-			705
Inventory		100,081			(101,631	)
Prepaid financing costs		99,933			-
Other assets		-			-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		300,683			30,645
Accrued interest		245,922			211,417
Unearned revenue		71,557			(52,140	)
NET CASH (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(847,473	)		(1,647,199	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of equipment		(40,990	)		(435,679	)
Patents		(39,589	)		-
NET CASH (USED) BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(80,579	)		(435,679	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable, net of fees		659,750			1,485,000
Prepayments of notes payable		-			(344,459	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		659,750			1,140,541

NET (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(268,302	)		(942,337	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD		287,641			1,229,978
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
AT THE END OF THE PERIOD	$	19,339		$	287,641

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F - 5

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS CONTINUED

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

	2009		2008

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF
CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Interest paid	$	12,500	$	42,551
Taxes paid	$	1,600	$	3,200

SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Issuance of 1,675,000 shares of common stock for debt conversion	$	-	$	1,675,000

Issuance of 87,174 shares of common stock for interest expense	$	-	$	87,174

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

F - 6

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 1 ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Business Description and Presentation

The Company is focused on the development and distribution of Provision’s patented three-dimensional, holographic interactive displays focused at grabbing and holding consumer attention particularly and initially in the advertising and product merchandising markets. The systems display a moving 3D image size to forty inches in front of the display, projecting a digital video image out into space detached from any screen, rendering truly independent floating images featuring high definition and crisp visibility from far distances. The nearest comparable to this technology can be seen in motion pictures such as Star Wars and Minority Report, where objects and humans are represented through full-motion holograms.

Provision’s proprietary and patented display technologies and software, and innovative solutions aim to attract consumer attention. Currently THE Company has multiple contracts to place Provision’s products into large California grocery stores, independent Hispanic grocery stores, as well as signed agreements with advertising agents to sell ad space to Fortune 500 customers. Given the technology’s potential in the advertising market, the Company is focused on creating recurring revenue streams from the sale of advertising space on each unit.

Management has reviewed and evaluated material subsequent events from the balance sheet date of June 30, 2009, through the financial statements issue date of November 12, 2009. All appropriate subsequent event disclosures have been made in the notes to our financial statements.

Going Concern

These financial statements are presented on the basis that the Company is a going concern. Going concern contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable length of time. The Company has incurred a loss of approximately $2,400,000 in the current period and has negative working capital of approximately $2,500,000. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely basis, to obtain additional financing or refinancing as may be required and, ultimately, to attain profitable operations. Management’s plan to eliminate the going concern situation include, but are not limited to, the raise of additional capital through issuance of debt and equity, improved cash flow management, aggressive cost reductions, and the creation of additional sales and profits across its product lines.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and timing of revenues and expenses, the reported amounts and classification of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates and assumptions are based on the Company’s historical results as well as management’s future expectations. The Company’s actual results could vary materially from management’s estimates and assumptions.

F - 7

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company estimates that the fair value of all financial instruments at June 30, 2009 as defined in FASB 107 does not differ materially from the aggregate carrying values of its financial instruments recorded in the accompanying balance sheet. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value, and accordingly, the estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments, with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased, to be cash equivalents.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market.

Intangibles

Intangibles represent primarily costs incurred in connection with patent applications. Such costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the useful life of the patent once issued, or expensed immediately if any specific application is unsuccessful.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, goodwill and intangible assets that are not subject to amortization shall be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test shall consist of a comparison of the fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount, as defined. If the carrying amount of goodwill or an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”, the carrying value of long-lived assets, including amortizable intangibles and property and equipment, are evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that a potential impairment has occurred relative to a given asset or assets. Impairment is deemed to have occurred if projected undiscounted cash flows associated with an asset are less than the carrying value of the asset. The estimated cash flows include management’s assumptions of cash inflows and outflows directly resulting from the use of that asset in operations. The amount of the impairment loss recognized is equal to the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its then estimated fair value. There were no impairment losses recognized in fiscal 2009 or 2008.

Revenue Recognition

The Company uses the accrual method of accounting. Sales are recognized when goods are shipped and title has passed. Revenue from licensing, distribution and marketing agreements is recognized over the term of the contract.

Significant Customers

During fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net sales.

Research and Development Costs

The Company charges all research and development costs to expense when incurred. Manufacturing costs associated with the development of a new process or a new product are expensed until such times as these processes or products are proven through final testing and initial acceptance by the customer.

Depreciation and Amortization

The Company depreciates its property and equipment using the straight-line method with estimated useful lives from three to seven years. For federal income tax purposes, depreciation is computed using an accelerated method.

F - 8

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company’s policy is to classify shipping and handling costs as a component of Costs of Products Sold in the Statement of Operations.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was approximately $115,866 and $186,522 in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Accounting for Stock Option Based Compensation

Effective July 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment: An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95” using the modified prospective method. Under this method, compensation cost is recognized on or after the effective date for the portion of outstanding awards, for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered, based on the grant date fair value of those awards. Prior to July 1, 2006, the Company accounted for employee stock options using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 (APB No. 25), “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and adopted the disclosure only alternative of SFAS No. 123. For stock-based awards issued on or after July 1, 2006, the Company recognizes the compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Measurement and attribution of compensation cost for awards that are unvested as of the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) are based on the same estimate of the grant-date or modification-date fair value and the same attribution method used under SFAS No. 123.

On November 10, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3 “Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards". The Company has elected to adopt the alternative transition method provided in the FASB Staff Position for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R). The alternative transition method includes simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation, and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). As the Company is currently in a net operating loss position and has placed valuation allowances on its net deferred tax assets, there is no net impact on the Company’s APIC pool related to stock-based compensation for the year ended June 30, 2008.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under the asset and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under SFAS 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations.

Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) per Share

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per common share is computed similar to basic income per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had debt instruments outstanding that can potentially be converted into 3,890,000 shares of common stock.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform the prior period amounts to the June 30, 2009 amounts for comparative purposes.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

F - 9

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASC Statement No. 105, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“ASC 105”). ASC 105 will become the single source authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force, and related accounting literature. ASC 105 reorganized the thousands of GAAP pronouncements into roughly 90 accounting topics and displays them using a consistent structure. Also included is relevant SEC guidance organized using the same topical structure in separate sections. The Company adopted ASC 105 for the financial statements ended September 30, 2009. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 2 INVENTORY

Inventory consists of the following:

	June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008

Raw materials	$	128,388	$	170,493
Work in process		94,324		125,715
Finished goods		-		26,585

Total	$	222,712	$	322,793

NOTE 3 EQUIPMENT, net

Equipment consists of the following:

	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008

Furniture and fixtures	$	17,018		$	17,018
Computer equipment		30,579			18,899
Equipment		166,602			166,602
Demo units		69,943			162,915
3DEO Kiosks		438,912			313,203
		723,054			678,637

Less accumulated depreciation		(250,339	)		(137,069	)

Total	$	472,715		$	541,568

F - 10

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 4 INTANGIBLES, net of accumulated amortization

Intangibles consist of the following:

	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2008

Patents in process	$	126,569		$	90,286
Patents issued		58,037			54,731
		184,606			145,017

Less accumulated amortization		(9,957	)		(7,461	)

Total	$	174,649		$	137,556

NOTE 5 CONVERTIBLE DEBT

During the fiscal year ended 2009, the Company issued $435,000 of convertible debt with warrants to purchase 299,990 shares of common stock. The note is convertible at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.75 per share. The note pays interest at a rate of 10% per annum and is due 24 months from the date of issuance. Under EITF 98-5 and 00-27 the relative fair value of the warrants and the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature were recorded as a discount to the notes. These discounts, totaling $321,000 will be amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the notes using the effective interest rate method.

In November of 2008, the Company issued $20,000 of convertible debt with warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock. The note is convertible at the end of two years from the date of the note at a conversion price of $0.50 per share. The note pays interest at a rate of 10% per annum and is due 24 months from the date of issuance. In addition, the Company allocated the proceeds of issuance between the convertible debt and the detachable warrants based on their relative fair values. Accordingly, the Company recognized the relative fair value of the warrants of $2,000 as a component of stockholders' equity. This discount of $2,000 will be amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest rate method.

In December of 2008, the Company issued $10,000 of convertible debt with warrants to purchase 9,900 shares of common stock. The note is convertible at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.50 per share. The note pays interest at a rate of 10% per annum and is 24 months from the date of issuance. Under EITF 98-5 and 00-27 the relative fair value of the warrants and the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature were recorded as a discount to the notes. This discount of $9,800 will be amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest rate method.

In May of 2009, the Company issued $25,000 of convertible debt with warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock. The note is convertible at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.18 per share. The note pays interest at a rate of 12% per annum and is due 12 months from the date of issuance. Under EITF 98-5 and 00-27 the relative fair value of the warrants and the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature were recorded as a discount to the notes. This discount of $9,158 will be amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest rate method.

In June of 2009, the Company issued $100,000 of convertible debt. The note is convertible at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.10 per share. The note pays interest at a rate of 5% per annum and is due in July 2010. Under EITF 98-5 and 00-27 the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a discount to the notes. This discount of $20,000 will be amortized and charged to interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest rate method.

The Company determined and recognized the fair value of the embedded beneficial conversion feature of $361,957 as additional paid-in capital as the convertible notes were issued with an intrinsic value conversion feature.

The Company has charged the beneficial conversion feature to additional paid-in capital. In addition, the Company allocated the proceeds of issuance between the convertible debt and the detachable warrants based on their relative fair values. For the year ended June 30, 2009 interest expense of $291,384 has been accreted increasing the carrying value of the convertible notes to $1,141,686 as at June 30, 2009. The fair value of the warrants was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with an expected life ranging from 24 to 36 months, a risk free interest rate ranging from .94% to 3.14%, a dividend yield of 0%, and an expected volatility of 100%.

Convertible debt consist of the following:

	June 30, 2009

Convertible notes payable, annual interest rate of 10%, due dates range from May 2010 to December 2010 convertible into common stock at a rate of $0.10 to $1.50 per share.	$	2,195,000

Convertible note payable, annual interest rate of 10%, convertible into common stock at a rate of $1 per share. Note matured on March 8, 2009 and is now in default and due upon demand.		750,000


Unamortized debt discount		(1,803,314	)

		1,141,686

Less current portion		(921,881	)

Convertible debt, net of current portion and debt discount	$	219,805

During the year ended June 30, 2009, $590,00 of convertible debt was issued with 369,890 warrants which expire within two years of the date of issue, through May 2011, with exercise prices of $1.00 to $1.50 per share.

Future note maturities of convertible debt for 2010 and 2011, are $828,000 and $1,455,000, respectively.

NOTE 6 NOTES PAYABLE

During the year ended June 30, 2009, $138,000 of debt was issued with 120,000 warrants which expire within three years of the date of issue, through March 2012, with exercise prices of $0.10 per share. $70,000 of these notes are secured on a dollar for dollar basis on the Company's 3DEO kiosks and mature during 2010.

NOTE 7 COMMITMENTS

Lease Agreement - The Company leases its office space under a month-to-month lease. Rent expense for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $73,824 and $74,024, respectively.

Royalty Fees - The Company has entered into a royalty agreement with another company. The other entity’s technology has certain characteristics and properties used in conjunction with the Company’s products. The agreement requires royalties to be paid at 4% of applicable sales. The Company is currently in contract negotiations to purchase the other entity’s patent. Royalty expense for the years ended June 30, 2007 and 2008 was $5,942 and $4,944, respectively.

F - 11

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

NOTE 8 EQUITY

Common Stock

During October 2008, the Company issued 6,519 shares of its common stock to a consultant for services rendered. The underlying shares had a fair market value of $7,500 on the date of issuance. As such, the Company has included $7,500 of non-cash compensation expense in the statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009.

During December 2008, the Company issued 320,000 shares of its common stock to a consultant for services rendered. The underlying shares had a fair market value of $249,600 on the date of issuance. As such, the Company has included $249,600 of non-cash compensation expense in the statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009.

During December 2008, the Company issued 142,500 shares of its common stock to three key employees for retention bonuses. The underlying shares had a fair market value of $27,075 on the date of issuance. As such, the Company has included $27,075 of non-cash compensation expense in the statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009.

During March 2009, the Company issued $1,500,000 shares of its common stock to a consultant for services to be rendered through March 2010. As such, the Company has included $35,625 of non-cash compensation expense in the statement of operations for the year ended June 30,2009.

During April 2009, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock to its legal counsel for services rendered. The underlying shares had a fair market value of $6,000 on the date of issuance. As such, the Company has included $6,000 of non-cash compensation expense in the statement of operations for the year ended June 30, 2009.

Warrants

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued warrants to purchase 369,890 shares of common stock in connection with convertible notes. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 to 1.50 per share and expire three years from the date of issue.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 17,000 warrants to consultants for services rendered. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.10 to $1.00 per share and expire three years from the date issue.

Total warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2009 were $2,300,000.

Stock Option Plan

The Company has one stock option plan: The Provision Interactive Technologies, Inc. 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, (the “Plan”). As of June 30, 2009, there were 3,886,649 shares available for issuance under the Plan. The Plan is administered by the Company’s Board of Directors, (the “Board”).

As of June 30, 2009, the Plan provides for the granting of non-qualified and incentive stock options to purchase up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock. Options vest at rates set by the Board, not to exceed five years and are exercisable up to ten years from the date of issuance. The option exercise price is set by the Board at time of grant. Options and restricted stock awards may be granted to employees, officers, directors and consultants.

During the year ended June 30, 2009, no new options were granted to employees or consultants. Employee options outstanding as of June 30, 2009 were 675,851. The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted under the Company’s Option Plan during the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 was $1.34 and $0, respectively.

Stock option transactions for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding, June 30, 2007		1,332,971		$	1.07		3.5
Granted		432,413		$	1.00
Exercised		(1,000,000	)		-			$	1,070,000
Expired		(89,533	)	$	1.07
Outstanding, June 30, 2008		675,851		$	2.00		2.5
Granted		-			-
Exercised		-			-
Expired
Outstanding, June 30, 2009		675,851			-		1.5		501,661
Exercisable, June 30, 2009		675,851		$	2.00		1.5		501,661

The fair value of options exercised in fiscal years 2009 and 2008 was approximately $0 and $1,070,000, respectively.

The Company accounts for stock-based incentives plans, in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123(R)). Accordingly, the Company estimates the fair value of stock-based awards utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model. The fair value of the awards is amortized as compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting period. The fair value calculations involve significant judgments, assumptions, estimates and complexities that impact the amount of compensation expense to be recorded in current and future periods. The following table summarizes the assumptions and variables used to compute the weighted average fair value of stock option grants:

F - 12

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

	Year Ended
	June 30, 2009		June 30, 2008
Option Plan Shares:
Expected term (in years)		N/A		5 to 10
Volatility		N/A		13.2% to 34.8%
Expected dividend		N/A		0%
Risk-free interest rate		N/A		2.15% to 4.91%
Weighted-average grant date fair value		N/A	$	0.88

Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company recorded $36,700 and $731,475 of stock compensation expense in our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

As of June 30, 2009, there was $0 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under existing stock option plans.

NOTE 9 INCOME TAXES

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities. Such deferred income tax asset and liability computations are based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the period plus or minus the change during the period in deferred income tax assets and liabilities.

Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of revenues and expenses for financial and tax reporting purposes. At June 30, 2009 and 2008, deferred income tax assets, which are fully reserved, were comprised primarily of the Net operating loss carryforwards of $2,000,000 and $2,00,000, respectively.

The valuation allowance increased by $2,000,000 and $700,000during the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, as a result of the increase in the Net Operating Carryforwards.

For federal income tax purposes, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of $11,000,000 as of June 30, 2009 that expire through 2029. Additionally, the ultimate utilization of net operating losses may be limited by change of control provision under section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Income tax expense for 2009 and 2008 consists of the minimum state franchise tax.

NOTE 10 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On August 26, 2004, in order to protect its legal rights and in the best interest of the shareholders at large, the Company filed, in the Superior Court of California, a complaint alleging breach of contract, rescission, tortuous interference and fraud with Betacorp Management, Inc. In an effort to resolve all outstanding issues, the parties agreed, in good faith, to enter into arbitration in the State of Texas, domicile of the defendants. On August 11, 2006, a judgment was awarded against the Company in the sum of $592,312. The Company believes the judgment is without merit and has filed an appeal. A contingency loss of $592,312 was charged to operations during the year ended June 30, 2007.

The Company has filed suit against one of its distributors for breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, intentional misrepresentation and coercion. Based upon the information provided by the Company’s counsel, the court has issued a preliminary award in favor of the Company. At this time, the estimated amount is $226,222. No provision for a gain has been reflected in the accompanying financial statements.

NOTE 11 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (UNAUDITED)

Convertible Debt

During July through November, 2009, the Company received $75,000 proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes payable. The convertible notes bear interest at 10% and are due fifteen months from the date of issuance. In connection with the convertible notes, the Company issued 150,000 warrants to the note holders with an exercise price of $0.50.

F - 13

PROVISION HOLDING, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008

Promissory Notes

During July through November, 2009, the Company received $80,000 proceeds from the issuance of promissory notes payable. The promissory notes bear interest at 10% and are due at various dates from April 2010 to July 2010.

Common Stock for Services

During July through November, 2009, the Company issued 1,172,272 shares of its common stock for services rendered during the time period.

F - 14

Attached files

Provision Holding, Inc. Reports

Also read