Attached files
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
one)
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
|
||
þ
|
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 (No Fee Required)
|
For the
transition period from ______ to ______.
Commission
file number 001-34143
RACKSPACE
HOSTING, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware
|
74-3016523
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
(IRS
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
5000
Walzem Rd.
San
Antonio, Texas 78218
(Address
of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)
(210)
312-4000
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).Yes o No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer and a smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer þ
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
On
November 6, 2009, 122,508,591 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001
par value, were outstanding.
RACKSPACE
HOSTING, INC.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Part
I – Financial Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009
(unaudited)
|
3
|
|
Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009
|
4
|
|
Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September
30, 2008 and 2009
|
5
|
|
Notes
to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
18
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
32
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
33
|
Part
II – Other Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
34
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
34
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
46
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
46
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders
|
46
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
46
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
47
|
Signatures
|
48
|
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RACKSPACE HOSTING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES—
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
||||||
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 238,407 | $ | 102,950 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts and
|
||||||||
customer
credits of $3,295 as of December 31, 2008,
|
||||||||
and
$5,184 as of September 30, 2009
|
30,932 | 39,902 | ||||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
12,318 | 4,072 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
10,838 | 14,056 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
292,495 | 160,980 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
362,042 | 419,454 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
6,942 | 22,329 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
15,101 | 12,344 | ||||||
Other
non-current assets
|
8,681 | 10,223 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 685,261 | $ | 625,330 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 71,387 | $ | 77,108 | ||||
Current
portion of deferred revenue
|
16,284 | 15,338 | ||||||
Current
portion of obligations under capital leases
|
38,909 | 46,408 | ||||||
Current
portion of debt
|
5,944 | 4,850 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
132,524 | 143,704 | ||||||
Non-current
deferred revenue
|
3,883 | 2,884 | ||||||
Non-current
obligations under capital leases
|
50,781 | 63,063 | ||||||
Non-current
debt
|
204,779 | 53,655 | ||||||
Non-current
deferred income taxes
|
13,398 | 19,665 | ||||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
10,212 | 11,967 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
415,577 | 294,938 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $0.001 par value per share: 300,000,000 shares
|
||||||||
authorized;
117,154,094 shares issued and outstanding
|
||||||||
as of
December 31, 2008, 122,426,741 shares issued and
|
||||||||
outstanding as
of September 30, 2009
|
117 | 122 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
207,589 | 241,355 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(16,027 | ) | (10,273 | ) | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
78,005 | 99,188 | ||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
269,684 | 330,392 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 685,261 | $ | 625,330 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
- 3
-
RACKSPACE
HOSTING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES—
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME – (Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Net
revenue
|
$ | 138,354 | $ | 162,399 | $ | 388,796 | $ | 459,471 | ||||||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
45,499 | 53,093 | 127,564 | 147,538 | ||||||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
21,462 | 19,860 | 58,876 | 59,442 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
38,729 | 43,622 | 110,470 | 122,728 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
23,174 | 32,696 | 63,862 | 90,211 | ||||||||||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
128,864 | 149,271 | 360,772 | 419,919 | ||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
9,490 | 13,128 | 28,024 | 39,552 | ||||||||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,912 | ) | (2,147 | ) | (5,076 | ) | (6,854 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
and other income (expense)
|
(144 | ) | 523 | 276 | 165 | |||||||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
(2,056 | ) | (1,624 | ) | (4,800 | ) | (6,689 | ) | ||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
7,434 | 11,504 | 23,224 | 32,863 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
2,199 | 3,900 | 8,365 | 11,680 | ||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 5,235 | $ | 7,604 | $ | 14,859 | $ | 21,183 | ||||||||
Net
income per share
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
111,231 | 121,501 | 105,698 | 119,788 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
118,724 | 129,160 | 112,796 | 125,849 | ||||||||||||
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
- 4
-
RACKSPACE
HOSTING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES—
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – (Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 14,859 | $ | 21,183 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activites
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
63,862 | 90,211 | ||||||
Loss on
disposal of equipment, net
|
2,277 | 976 | ||||||
Provision for
bad debts and customer credits
|
2,340 | 8,848 | ||||||
Deferred income
taxes
|
10,486 | 5,103 | ||||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
10,873 | 14,866 | ||||||
Deferred
rent
|
419 | 2,049 | ||||||
Other
non-cash compensation expense
|
212 | 599 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
|
(3,212 | ) | - | |||||
Changes
in certain assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(5,446 | ) | (16,991 | ) | ||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
(10,837 | ) | 8,246 | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
17,665 | 2,620 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
2,114 | (2,394 | ) | |||||
All
other operating activities
|
(3,399 | ) | (4,112 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
102,213 | 131,204 | ||||||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities
|
||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment, net
|
(132,849 | ) | (82,640 | ) | ||||
Earnout
payments for acquisitions
|
- | (6,822 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(132,849 | ) | (89,462 | ) | ||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
|
||||||||
Principal
payments of capital leases
|
(22,881 | ) | (32,513 | ) | ||||
Principal
payments of notes payable
|
(5,521 | ) | (5,908 | ) | ||||
Borrowings
on line of credit
|
200,000 | - | ||||||
Payments
on line of credit
|
(57,301 | ) | (150,000 | ) | ||||
Payments
for debt issuance costs
|
(158 | ) | (367 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale leaseback transactions
|
1,543 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock at IPO net of offering expenses of
$13,555
|
145,195 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock, net
|
548 | - | ||||||
Exercise
of warrants
|
278 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
1,964 | 9,743 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
|
3,212 | - | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
266,879 | (179,045 | ) | |||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(862 | ) | 1,846 | |||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
235,381 | (135,457 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
24,937 | 238,407 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 260,318 | $ | 102,950 | ||||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Acquisition
of property and equipment by capital leases
|
$ | 58,708 | $ | 52,294 | ||||
Acquisition
of property and equipment by notes payable
|
11,934 | 3,690 | ||||||
Vendor
financed equipment purchases
|
$ | 70,642 | $ | 55,984 | ||||
Shares
issued in business combinations
|
$ | - | $ | 8,680 | ||||
Cash
payments for interest, net of amount capitalized
|
$ | 5,676 | $ | 6,266 | ||||
Cash
payments for income taxes
|
$ | 6,075 | $ | 5,300 |
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
- 5
-
RACKSPACE
HOSTING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES—
NOTES
TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Overview and Basis of Presentation
Nature
of Operations
As used
in this report, the terms “Rackspace”, “Rackspace Hosting”, “we”, “our company”,
“the company”, “us,” or “our” refer to Rackspace Hosting, Inc. and its
subsidiaries. Rackspace Hosting, Inc., through its operating
subsidiaries, provides hosting services and cloud computing solutions, including
managed hosting, cloud hosting, as well as email and application
hosting. We focus on providing a service experience for our
customers, which we call Fanatical Support®.
Rackspace
Hosting, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on March 7, 2000. However, our
operations began in 1998 as a limited partnership which became our subsidiary
through a corporate reorganization completed on August 21, 2001.
We
operate consolidated subsidiaries which include, among others, Rackspace US,
Inc., our domestic operating entity, and Rackspace Limited, our United Kingdom
operating entity.
In
October 2008, we completed the acquisition of Jungle Disk, Inc., a company
specializing in cloud storage. Also in October 2008, we completed the
acquisition of Slicehost LLC, a company specializing in cloud
hosting. Accordingly, their operating results have been included in
our consolidated financial statements since the date of
acquisition.
Basis
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of our wholly owned
subsidiaries located in the United States of America (U.S.), the United Kingdom
(U.K.), the Netherlands, and Hong Kong. Intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2009, and for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, are unaudited and
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and Rule 10-01
of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all financial
information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements
and certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or
omitted. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have
been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements
and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of our financial position
as of September 30, 2009, our results of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, and our cash flows for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009.
These
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
as of December 31, 2008 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 2, 2009, as
amended. The results of the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2009, or for any other interim period, or for any other
future year.
Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior year balances in order to conform to
the current year’s presentation.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an
ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to accounts
receivable and customer credits, property and equipment, fair values of
intangible assets and goodwill, useful lives of intangible assets, fair value of
stock options, contingencies, and income taxes, among others. We base our
estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions that are believed to
be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities. We engaged third party valuation
consultants to assist management in the purchase price allocation of significant
acquisitions. We also engaged third party valuation consultants to
assist management in the valuation of our common stock price, which affected
transactions recorded in our consolidated financial statements prior to
Rackspace becoming a public company.
- 6
-
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The
accompanying financial statements reflect the application of certain significant
accounting policies. There have been no material changes to our significant
accounting policies that are disclosed in our audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereof as of December 31, 2008 included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, as amended.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. U.S. GAAP will no
longer be issued in the form of an “accounting standard,” but rather as an
update to the applicable “topic” or “subtopic” within the codification. As such,
accounting guidance will be classified as either “authoritative” or
“nonauthoritative” based on its inclusion or exclusion from the
codification. The codification will be the single source of
authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards, except for rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws,
which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The
codification of U.S. GAAP became effective for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. This statement did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R), which is to be included in Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 810, Consolidation. This guidance amends
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003) to address the
elimination of the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity. SFAS 167 also
replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining
which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to
direct the activities of a variable interest entity and the obligation to absorb
losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity.
Additionally, SFAS 167 provides more timely and useful information about an
enterprise’s involvement with a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 will become
effective in the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15,
2009 and for interim periods within that first annual reporting
period. It will become effective for Rackspace in the first quarter
of 2010. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued two Accounting Standards Updates (ASU): (i) ASU
2009-13 (EITF 08-1), Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements, and (ii) ASU 2009-14 (EITF 09-3), Certain Revenue Arrangements that
Include Software Elements, which will be effective prospectively for
revenue arrangements, entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. ASU 2009-13 amends ASC Subtopic
605-25 to eliminate the requirement that all undelivered elements in a
multiple-element revenue arrangement have vendor-specific objective evidence
(VSOE) or third-party evidence (TPE) before an entity can recognize the portion
of an overall arrangement fee that is attributable to items that already have
been delivered. In the absence of VOSE or TPE of the standalone
selling price for one or more delivered or undelivered elements in a
multiple-element arrangement, entities will be required to estimate the selling
prices of those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be
allocated to each element (both delivered and undelivered items) based on their
relative selling prices, regardless of whether those selling prices are
evidenced by VSOE or TPE or are based on the entity’s estimated selling
price. Application of the “residual method” of allocating an overall
arrangement fee between delivered and undelivered elements will no longer be
permitted upon adoption. ASU 2009-14 amends ASC Subtopic 985-605 to
exclude from its scope tangible products that contain both software and
non-software components that function together to deliver a product’s essential
functionality. We are currently evaluating the impact of these
standards on our consolidated financial statements.
- 7
-
3.
Earnings Per Share
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share:
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
thousands, except per share data)
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Basic
net income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 5,235 | $ | 7,604 | $ | 14,859 | $ | 21,183 | ||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
stock
|
110,729 | 121,501 | 104,722 | 119,788 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
502 | - | 976 | - | ||||||||||||
Number
of shares used in per share computations
|
111,231 | 121,501 | 105,698 | 119,788 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per
share
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||
Diluted
net income per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 5,235 | $ | 7,604 | $ | 14,859 | $ | 21,183 | ||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
stock
|
110,729 | 121,501 | 104,722 | 119,788 | ||||||||||||
Stock
options and awards
|
7,391 | 7,659 | 6,900 | 6,061 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
stock
|
502 | - | 976 | - | ||||||||||||
Stock
warrants
|
102 | - | 198 | - | ||||||||||||
Number
of shares used in per share computations
|
118,724 | 129,160 | 112,796 | 125,849 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per
share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.17 | ||||||||
We excluded
4.9 million and 0.5 million potential common shares from the computation of
dilutive earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and
2009, respectively, and 5.7 million and 5.3 million potential shares for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, and 2009, respectively, because the effect
would have been anti-dilutive.
As a
result of our initial public offering (IPO) in August 2008, all outstanding
stock warrants were exercised, resulting in an issuance of 268,750 shares of
common stock, and all shares of our outstanding preferred stock were
automatically converted to shares of common stock; thus subsequent to the IPO,
the impact of these transactions on the weighted average shares outstanding was
reflected in common stock.
4.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and
cash equivalents consisted of:
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||
Cash
deposits
|
$ | 37,787 | $ | 42,250 | ||||
Money
market funds
|
200,620 | 60,700 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 238,407 | $ | 102,950 | ||||
Our money
market mutual funds invest exclusively in high-quality, short-term securities
that are issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or by U.S. government
agencies.
- 8
-
5. Fair
Value Measurements
We
adopted the full provisions of ASC Subtopic 820-10 (formerly SFAS 157), Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. Fair value is defined as the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There is a
three-tier fair value of hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in
measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1 –
Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities;
Level 2 –
Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly,
such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the
assets or liabilities; and
Level 3 –
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, which
require management judgment or estimation.
We
measure applicable assets and liabilities at fair value. Our money market funds
are classified within Level 1 because they are valued using quoted market
prices. Our interest rate swap is classified within Level 2 as the
valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of
similar instruments.
The
carrying values of cash deposits, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and
other assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses are reasonable estimates of
their fair values due to the short maturity of these financial instruments and
are classified within Level II.
Assets
and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized by
level below. The table does not include assets and liabilities which
are measured at historical costs or any other basis other than fair
value.
(In
thousands)
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
Total
Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Money
market funds (1)
|
$ | 200,620 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 200,620 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 200,620 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 200,620 | ||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreement (1)
|
$ | - | $ | 2,901 | $ | - | $ | 2,901 | ||||||||
Deferred
compensation (2)
|
296 | - | - | 296 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 296 | $ | 2,901 | $ | - | $ | 3,197 | ||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
September
30, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
Total
Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Money
market funds (1)
|
$ | 60,700 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 60,700 | ||||||||
Rabbi
trust (3)
|
574 | - | - | 574 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 61,274 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 61,274 | ||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate swap agreement (1)
|
$ | - | $ | 2,201 | $ | - | $ | 2,201 | ||||||||
Deferred
compensation (2)
|
559 | - | - | 559 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 559 | $ | 2,201 | $ | - | $ | 2,760 | ||||||||
(1)
Money market funds are classified in cash and cash equivalents and the
interest rate swap agreement is classified in other non-current
liabilities.
|
||||||||||||||||
(2)
Obligations to pay benefits under a non-qualified deferred compensation
plan that are classified in other non-current liabilities.
|
||||||||||||||||
(3)
Investments in marketable securities held in a Rabbi Trust associated with
a non-qualified deferred compensation plan located in other non-current
assets.
|
Our Rabbi
Trust was established in January 2009 and we elected the fair value option under
FASB ASC Subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments, which
allows for the recognition of gains and losses to be recorded in the statement
of income in the same period as the gains and losses are incurred as part of the
non-qualified deferred compensation plan. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized a net gain of $44 thousand and
$92 thousand, respectively, as interest and other income
(expense).
- 9
-
6.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
$ | 5,481 | $ | 7,938 | ||||
Current
deferred taxes
|
3,050 | 3,265 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
2,307 | 2,853 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
$ | 10,838 | $ | 14,056 |
7.
Property and Equipment, net
Property
and equipment consisted of:
(In
thousands)
|
Estimated
Useful Lives
|
December
31,
2008
|
September
30,
2009
|
|||||||||
Computers,
software and equipment
|
1-5
years
|
$ | 350,697 | $ | 482,218 | |||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
7
years
|
12,856 | 19,208 | |||||||||
Buildings
and leasehold improvements
|
2-30
years
|
61,839 | 110,849 | |||||||||
Land
|
-- | 13,860 | 13,860 | |||||||||
Property
and equipment, at cost
|
439,252 | 626,135 | ||||||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(188,300 | ) | (269,561 | ) | ||||||||
Work in
process
|
111,090 | 62,880 | ||||||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
$ | 362,042 | $ | 419,454 |
Depreciation
and leasehold amortization expense, not including amortization expense for
intangible assets, was $21.8 million and $31.0 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and $61.0 million and
$85.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
At
December 31, 2008, the work in process balance consisted of build outs of $47.0
million for office facilities and $53.5 million for data centers, and $10.6
million for capitalized software and other projects. At September 30,
2009, the work in process balance consisted of build outs of $55.3 million for
office facilities and $2.8 million for data centers, and $4.8 million for
capitalized software and other projects.
Capitalized
interest was $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2009, respectively and $1.7 million and $0.7 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
8.
Business Combinations and Goodwill
In
October 2008, we acquired two companies with a total purchase price of $28.0
million, which were accounted for as business combinations. The
initial purchase price of the combined acquisitions was $11.5 million paid in
cash and stock, with up to $16.5 million in additional payouts of cash and stock
based on certain earnout provisions. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, earn-outs totaling $15.5 million were achieved and paid in
both cash and stock, of which $8.0 million was achieved in the three months
ended September 30, 2009. If the remaining $1.0 million in additional
earn-out is achieved, the payment will be accounted for as additional
goodwill.
The
following table provides a roll forward of our goodwill balance.
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 6,942 | ||
Earn-out
payments for acquisitions
|
15,502 | |||
Purchase
accounting adjustments
|
(115 | ) | ||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
$ | 22,329 |
- 10
-
9.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses consisted of:
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||
Trade
payables
|
$ | 23,459 | $ | 23,661 | ||||
Accrued
compensation and benefits
|
19,462 | 20,049 | ||||||
Foreign
income taxes payable
|
324 | 6,068 | ||||||
Vendor
accruals
|
19,984 | 19,257 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
8,158 | 8,073 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 71,387 | $ | 77,108 |
10.
Debt
Debt
outstanding consisted of:
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||
Revolving
credit facility
|
$ | 200,000 | $ | 50,000 | ||||
Notes
payable
|
10,723 | 8,505 | ||||||
Total
debt
|
210,723 | 58,505 | ||||||
Less
current portion of debt
|
(5,944 | ) | (4,850 | ) | ||||
Total
non-current debt
|
$ | 204,779 | $ | 53,655 | ||||
Revolving
Credit Facility
Our
revolving credit facility includes an aggregate commitment of $245.0
million. The facility provides for letters of credit up to
$25.0 million. The interest is based on a floating rate, generally the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin spread, which changes
ratably from 0.675% to 1.55% dependent on the total funded debt to adjusted
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) ratio.
We are required to pay a facility fee of 0.2% per annum on the full amount
committed under the facility and a quarterly administrative fee. The facility
has a 5-year term and matures in August 2012, and is fully secured by our assets
and governed by financial and non-financial covenants. Financial
covenants under our facility include a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a
maximum total funded debt to EBITDA ratio. As of September 30, 2009, we were in
compliance with all of the covenants under our facility.
In June
2009, we amended the revolving credit facility agreement to provide us with the
ability to borrow under our credit facility in Pounds Sterling and Euros, rather
than only allowing our borrowings in U.S. dollars. We have the ability to borrow
up to $75 million in alternate currencies. In addition, the amendment
provides for changes in regard to certain other items in the credit agreement,
including but not limited to (i) the calculation to determine our “Minimum
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio”, (ii) our banking account maintenance, and (iii)
requirements for access to collateral located at our various real property
locations. These changes were made in order to provide clarifications that
reflected compliance expectations that already existed among the parties. We
incurred fees of
$367 thousand
in connection with the amendment which have been capitalized and are
being amortized over the remaining term of the revolver. As of September 30,
2009 we did not have any borrowings on our credit facility in alternate
currencies.
In July
2009 we repaid $50.0 million, reducing our borrowings on the facility to $50.0
million.
As of
September 30, 2009, the amount outstanding under the facility was $50.0 million,
with an outstanding letter of credit of $0.7 million, and an additional $194.3
million available for future borrowings.
- 11
-
Interest
Rate Swap
We have a
cash flow hedge to limit our exposure that may result from the variability of
floating interest rates. Effective December 10, 2007, we entered into an
interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $50.0
million. The interest rate swap hedges the first $50.0
million of our outstanding floating-rate debt. This swap converts floating rate
interest based on the LIBOR into fixed-rate interest as part of the arrangement
with our primary lender and expires in December 2010.
We are
required to pay the counterparty a stream of fixed interest payments at a rate
of 4.135%, and in turn, receive variable interest payments based on 1-month
LIBOR. The margin spread as of September 30, 2009 was 1.05% resulting in
an effective fixed rate of 5.185%. The net receipts or payments from
the swap are recorded as interest expense. The swap is designated and qualifies
as a cash flow hedge under FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. As
such, the swap is accounted for as an asset or a liability in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets at fair value. We are utilizing the
dollar offset method to assess the effectiveness of the swap. Under this
methodology, the swap was deemed to be highly effective for the nine month
periods ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009. There was no hedge
ineffectiveness recognized in earnings for either period. If the
hedge becomes ineffective, or if certain terms of the facility change,
the facility is extinguished, or if the swap is terminated prior to
maturity, the fair value of the swap and subsequent changes in fair value may be
recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The
fair value of the swap was estimated based on the yield curve as of
December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, and represents its carrying
value.
The
following table presents the impact of the interest rate swap on the
consolidated balance sheets:
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
$ | 2,901 | $ | 2,201 | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
(loss),
net of tax
|
$ | (1,886 | ) | $ | (1,431 | ) |
Three
Months Ending September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ending September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Effective
gain (loss) recognized in accumulated
other
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
$ | (77 | ) | $ | 130 | $ | (220 | ) | $ | 455 |
Our
counterparty is also the primary lender on our revolving credit facility and we
actively monitor the potential credit risk. As of September 30, 2009,
we were in a liability position to our primary lender and therefore had limited
counterparty credit risk.
- 12
-
11.
Other Non-Current Liabilities
Other non-current liabilities consisted
of:
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||
Texas
Enterprise Fund Grant
|
$ | 5,000 | $ | 5,000 | ||||
Other
|
5,212 | 6,967 | ||||||
Other
non-current liabilities
|
$ | 10,212 | $ | 11,967 | ||||
In August
2007, we entered into an agreement with the State of Texas (Texas Enterprise
Fund Grant) under which we may receive up to $22.0 million in state enterprise
fund grants on the condition that we meet certain employment levels in the State
of Texas paying an average compensation of at least $56,000 per year (subject to
increases). To the extent we fail to meet these requirements, we may be required
to repay all or a portion of the grants plus interest. In September
2007, we received the initial installment of $5.0 million from the State of
Texas, which was recorded as a non-current liability.
In July 2009,
the Texas Enterprise Fund Grant agreement was amended to modify the job creation
requirements. Under the amendment, the grant was divided into four separate
tranches. The first tranche, called “Basic Fund” in the amendment, is $8.5
million with a target of 1,225 new jobs created in the state of Texas by
December 31, 2012. We already have drawn $5.0 million of this tranche. We can
draw an additional $3.5 million when we reach the target. While we expect to
meet the job target requirements, if we do not create these jobs by December 31,
2012 and maintain them through December 31, 2021, we will be required to repay
portions of the grant (clawback), with the maximum clawback being the amounts we
have drawn plus 3.4% interest on such amounts per year. The remaining three
tranches are at our option and provide for additional draws up to $13.5 million,
which are also subject to clawbacks.
12.
Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
Proceedings
We are party
to various legal and administrative proceedings, which we consider routine and
incidental to our business. In addition, on October 22, 2008, Benjamin E. Rodriguez D/B/A
Management and Business Advisors vs. Rackspace Hosting, Inc. and Graham
Weston, was filed in the 37th
District Court in Bexar County Texas by a former consultant to the company,
Benjamin E. Rodriguez. The suit alleges breach of an oral agreement to issue Mr.
Rodriguez a 1% interest in our stock in the form of options or warrants for
compensation for services he was engaged to perform for us. We believe that the
plaintiff’s position is without merit and intend to vigorously defend this
lawsuit. We do not expect the results of this claim or any other current
proceeding to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations or financial condition.
Contingent
Liability
We previously
recorded a $2.1 million charge to cost of revenue related to an
unresolved contractual issue with a vendor. We recorded a loss contingency
liability with respect to this matter in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 450,
Contingencies (formerly
SFAS 5). Due to the uncertainty regarding the interpretation of
certain contractual terms, it is possible the ultimate loss may exceed or be
less than the amount currently accrued.
- 13
-
13.
Share-Based Compensation
In
January 2009, our board of directors approved an additional 5.5 million shares
for future grant under the Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Plan. As
of September 30, 2009, the total number of shares authorized under all of our
plans was 42.8 million shares, of which approximately 6.3 million shares were
available for future grants.
Outstanding
stock awards were as follows:
December
31,
2008
|
September
30,
2009
|
|||||||
Restricted
stock units
|
50,000 | 2,050,000 | ||||||
Stock
options
|
19,255,644 | 17,944,547 | ||||||
Total
outstanding awards
|
19,305,644 | 19,994,547 | ||||||
The
following table summarizes our restricted stock unit activity for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009:
Number
of Units
|
||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
50,000 | |||
Units
granted
|
2,000,000 | |||
Units
vested
|
- | |||
Units
cancelled
|
- | |||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2009
|
2,050,000 | |||
On February 25,
2009, our board approved grants of restricted stock units (RSUs) to our chief
executive officer and another member of the executive team. A total of 2,000,000
RSUs were granted. The vesting of the RSUs are dependent on the company’s total
shareholder return (TSR) on its common stock compared to other companies in the
Russell 2000 Index. In addition, the company’s TSR must be positive for vesting
to occur. Of the total RSUs granted, 1,050,000 have a measurement period at the
end of three years, and the remainder at the end of five years. The
fair value of these awards was $7.0 million at the date of grant using a Monte
Carlo pricing model, and are being amortized over their service periods.
- 14
-
The
following table summarizes the activity under our stock plans:
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
19,255,644 | $ | 4.94 | 7.01 | $ | 34,050 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
3,927,850 | $ | 5.46 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(4,398,980 | ) | $ | 2.22 | ||||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(839,967 | ) | $ | 7.40 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2009
|
17,944,547 | $ | 5.61 | 7.64 | $ | 205,481 | ||||||||||
Vested
and exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
6,722,666 | $ | 3.22 | 6.28 | $ | 93,030 | ||||||||||
Vested and exercisable at September 30, 2009 |
|
|||||||||||||||
and
expected to vest thereafter *
|
16,517,907 | $ | 5.45 | 7.53 | $ | 191,732 | ||||||||||
*
Includes reduction of shares outstanding due to estimated
forfeitures
|
On
February 25, 2009, our board approved the grant of 3.7 million stock
options for certain employees with an exercise price of $5.09. The shares vest
25% at the end of each year over a four-year period and expire after ten years.
The fair value of these stock options was $2.97 per option using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The total
pre-tax intrinsic value of the stock options exercised during the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, was $4.2 million and $12.5 million,
respectively and $12.4 million and $31.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
The
weighted average fair value of stock options issued for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009 was $8.52 and $9.03 respectively, and $7.96 and
$3.19 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively, using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions:
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Expected
stock volatility
|
60% - 61% | 59% | 60% - 65% | 59% - 61% | ||||||||||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||||||||||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
3.30% - 3.45% | 3.03% | 2.71% - 3.45% | 2.24% - 3.03% | ||||||||||||
Expected
life
|
6.25 - 6.50 years |
6.25
years
|
6.25 - 6.50 years |
6.25
years
|
||||||||||||
As of
September 30, 2009, there was $44.6 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to non-vested stock options granted under our various plans, which
will be amortized using the straight line method over a weighted average period
of 2.2 years.
Share-based
compensation expense was recognized as follows:
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
$ | 819 | $ | 778 | $ | 1,788 | $ | 2,082 | ||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
612 | 826 | 1,546 | 2,245 | ||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
2,886 | 4,008 | 7,539 | 10,539 | ||||||||||||
Pre-tax
share-based compensation
|
4,317 | 5,612 | 10,873 | 14,866 | ||||||||||||
Less:
Income tax benefit
|
(1,356 | ) | (1,913 | ) | (3,916 | ) | (5,284 | ) | ||||||||
Total
share-based compensation
|
||||||||||||||||
expense, net of
tax
|
$ | 2,961 | $ | 3,699 | $ | 6,957 | $ | 9,582 | ||||||||
- 15
-
14.
Income Taxes
We are
subject to U.S. federal income tax and various state, local, and international
income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Our domestic and international tax
liabilities are subject to the allocation of revenue and expenses in different
jurisdictions and the timing of recognizing revenue and expenses. Additionally,
the amount of income taxes paid is subject to our interpretation of applicable
tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we file.
We
currently file income tax returns in the U.S., the U.K., the Netherlands and
Hong Kong, which are periodically under audit by federal, state, and
international tax authorities. These audits can involve complex matters that may
require an extended period of time for resolution. The Internal Revenue Service
completed an examination of our consolidated U.S. Federal income tax returns
through fiscal year 2004 with no changes to the tax return. We remain subject to
U.S. federal and state income tax examinations for the tax years 2005 through
2008, and to U.K. income tax examinations for the years 2002 through 2007. There
are no income tax examinations currently in process. Although the outcome of
open tax audits is uncertain, in management’s opinion, adequate provisions for
income taxes have been made. If actual outcomes differ materially from these
estimates, they could have a material impact on our financial condition and
results of operations. Differences between actual results and assumptions, or
changes in assumptions in future periods are recorded in the period they become
known. To the extent additional information becomes available prior to
resolution, such accruals are adjusted to reflect probable outcomes. Our
effective tax rate is impacted by earnings being realized in countries where we
have lower statutory rates.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 we received federal income
tax refunds totaling $7.5 million and $10.1 million, respectively, related to
the 2008 tax period. We experienced a taxable loss in 2008 primarily
as a result of the accelerated depreciation allowed under the 2008 Economic
Stimulus Act passed in February 2008.
15.
Comprehensive Income
Total
comprehensive income was as follows:
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 5,235 | $ | 7,604 | $ | 14,859 | $ | 21,183 | ||||||||
Derivative
instrument, net of deferred taxes of $64 and
$(70) for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, and $142 and
$(245) for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2009.
|
(77 | ) | 130 | (220 | ) | 455 | ||||||||||
Foreign
currency cumulative translation adjustmment, net of taxes of $986 and $109
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, $985 and $(1,588)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009.
|
(4,160 | ) | (2,176 | ) | (4,168 | ) | 5,299 | |||||||||
Total
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(4,237 | ) | (2,046 | ) | (4,388 | ) | 5,754 | |||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$ | 998 | $ | 5,558 | $ | 10,471 | $ | 26,937 | ||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
Derivative
Instrument
|
Translation
Adjustment
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | (1,886 | ) | $ | (14,141 | ) | $ | (16,027 | ) | |||
2009
changes in fair value
|
455 | - | 455 | |||||||||
2009
translation adjustment
|
- | 5,299 | 5,299 | |||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
$ | (1,431 | ) | $ | (8,842 | ) | $ | (10,273 | ) | |||
- 16
-
16.
Segment Information
FASB ASC
Topic 280, Segment
Reporting (formerly SFAS 131), establishes standards for reporting
information about operating segments. Operating segments are defined as
components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is
available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker, or
decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. Our chief operating decision-maker is our chief executive officer.
Our chief executive officer reviews financial information presented on a
consolidated basis, accompanied by information by business unit and geographic
region for purposes of evaluating financial performance and allocating
resources. We are organized as, and operate two business units:
managed hosting and cloud computing services, which includes cloud hosting, as
well as email and application hosting. We have evaluated the criteria
for aggregation by products and services, and by geography, and determined we
have one reportable segment, which we describe as Hosting. Revenue is
attributed by geographic location based on the Rackspace Hosting operating
location that enters into the contractual relationship with the customer, either
the U.S. or outside U.S., primarily the U.K. Our long-lived assets
are primarily located in the U.S. and U.K., and to a lesser extent Hong
Kong.
Total net revenue by geographic region
was as follows:
Three
Months Ending September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ending September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 99,173 | $ | 119,896 | $ | 276,120 | $ | 343,769 | ||||||||
Outside
United States
|
39,181 | 42,503 | 112,676 | 115,702 | ||||||||||||
Total
net revenue
|
$ | 138,354 | $ | 162,399 | $ | 388,796 | $ | 459,471 | ||||||||
Long-lived
assets by geographic region were as follows:
December
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2008
|
2009
|
||||||
United
States
|
$ | 322,949 | $ | 373,261 | ||||
Outside
United States
|
68,930 | 89,236 | ||||||
Total
long-lived assets
|
$ | 391,879 | $ | 462,497 | ||||
17.
Related Party Transactions
We lease
some facilities from a partnership controlled by our chairman of the board of
directors. For these leases, we recognized $166 thousand and $180 thousand of
rent expense on our consolidated statements of income for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and $443 thousand and $546
thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
18.
Subsequent Events
In
connection with the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events, (formerly
SFAS 165) we evaluated events after the balance sheet date of September 30, 2009
through November 12, 2009, the day the consolidated financial statements were
issued.
- 17
-
ITEM
2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
References to “we,” “our,” “our
company,” “us,” “the company,” “Rackspace Hosting,” or “Rackspace” refer to
Rackspace Hosting, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. We have
made forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are
subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are subject
to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. The forward-looking
statements in this report are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions
and on information currently available to our management. In some cases, you can
identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipates,” “aspires,”
“believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,”
“may,” “plans,” “projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “will” or “would” or the negative
of these terms and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance, time frames or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance,
time frames or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. We discuss many of these risks, uncertainties and other factors in
this document in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors.” We believe it
is important to communicate our expectations to our investors. However, there
may be events in the future that we are not able to predict accurately or over
which we have no control. The risks described in “Risk Factors” included in this
report, as well as any other cautionary language in this report, provide
examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to
differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking
statements. You should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in
“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report could harm our
business.
Given
these risks, uncertainties and other factors, you should not place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, these forward-looking
statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this
filing. You should read this document completely and with the understanding that
our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We
hereby qualify our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these
forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements, even if new information becomes available in the
future.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and the related notes contained elsewhere in this
document.
Overview
of our Business
Rackspace
Hosting, Inc. is the world leader in hosting and cloud computing. Our growth is
the result of our commitment to serving our customers, known as Fanatical
Support®, and
our exclusive focus on hosting and cloud computing. We have been successful in
attracting and retaining thousands of customers and in growing our business. We
are a pioneer in an emerging category, hybrid hosting, which combines the
benefits of both traditional dedicated hosting and cloud computing. We are
committed to maintaining our service-centric focus and will follow our vision to
be considered one of the world’s greatest service companies.
Rackspace
offers a full suite of hosting services, including managed hosting, cloud
hosting, as well as email and application hosting. The equipment
required (servers, routers, switches, firewalls, load balancers, cabinets,
software, wiring, etc.) to deliver services is typically purchased and managed
by us.
We sell
our services to small and medium-sized businesses as well as large enterprises.
For the nine months of 2009, 25.2% of our net revenue was generated by our
operations outside of the U.S., mainly from the U.K. Late in 2008, we also began
operations of a Hong Kong data center and a sales office, which generated
minimal revenue in 2008 and the first nine months of 2009. Our growth
strategy includes, among other strategies, targeting international customers as
we plan to expand our activities in continental Europe and Asia. For the first
nine months of 2009, no individual customer accounted for greater than 2% of our
net revenue.
Key
Metrics
We
carefully track several financial and operational metrics to monitor and manage
our growth, financial performance, and capacity. Our key metrics are structured
around growth, profitability, capital efficiency, infrastructure capacity, and
utilization. The following data should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements, the notes to the financial statements and
other financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
- 18
-
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollar
amounts in thousands, except annualized net
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
March
31,
|
June
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
revenue
per average technical square foot)
|
2008
|
2008
|
2009
|
2009
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Growth
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Managed
hosting customers at period end
|
18,012 | 18,480 | 19,048 | 19,363 | 19,328 | |||||||||||||||
Cloud
customers at period end*
|
18,173 | 34,820 | 43,030 | 51,440 | 61,616 | |||||||||||||||
Number
of customers at period end
|
36,185 | 53,300 | 62,078 | 70,803 | 80,944 | |||||||||||||||
Managed
hosting, net revenue
|
$ | 131,908 | $ | 134,275 | $ | 134,204 | $ | 138,943 | $ | 147,065 | ||||||||||
Cloud,
net revenue
|
$ | 6,446 | $ | 8,862 | $ | 10,873 | $ | 13,052 | $ | 15,334 | ||||||||||
Net
revenue
|
$ | 138,354 | $ | 143,137 | $ | 145,077 | $ | 151,995 | $ | 162,399 | ||||||||||
Revenue
growth (year over year)
|
44.0 | % | 34.2 | % | 21.3 | % | 16.2 | % | 17.4 | % | ||||||||||
Net
upgrades (monthly average)
|
1.8 | % | 1.4 | % | 0.9 | % | 1.2 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||
Churn
(monthly average)
|
-1.2 | % | -1.3 | % | -1.1 | % | -1.0 | % | -1.1 | % | ||||||||||
Growth
in installed base (monthly average)
|
0.6 | % | 0.1 | % | -0.2 | % | 0.2 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||
Number
of employees (Rackers) at period end
|
2,536 | 2,611 | 2,661 | 2,648 | 2,730 | |||||||||||||||
Number
of servers deployed at period end
|
45,231 | 47,518 | 50,038 | 52,269 | 54,655 | |||||||||||||||
Profitability
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
$ | 9,490 | $ | 12,125 | $ | 13,021 | $ | 13,403 | $ | 13,128 | ||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
$ | 23,174 | $ | 26,310 | $ | 27,804 | $ | 29,711 | $ | 32,696 | ||||||||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
$ | 819 | $ | 678 | $ | 629 | $ | 675 | $ | 778 | ||||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
$ | 612 | $ | 595 | $ | 698 | $ | 721 | $ | 826 | ||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
$ | 2,886 | $ | 2,871 | $ | 2,910 | $ | 3,621 | $ | 4,008 | ||||||||||
Total
share-based compensation expense
|
$ | 4,317 | $ | 4,144 | $ | 4,237 | $ | 5,017 | $ | 5,612 | ||||||||||
Adjusted
EBITDA (1)
|
$ | 36,981 | $ | 42,579 | $ | 45,062 | $ | 48,131 | $ | 51,436 | ||||||||||
Adjusted
EBITDA margin
|
26.7 | % | 29.7 | % | 31.1 | % | 31.7 | % | 31.7 | % | ||||||||||
Operating
income margin
|
6.9 | % | 8.5 | % | 9.0 | % | 8.8 | % | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
$ | 9,490 | $ | 12,125 | $ | 13,021 | $ | 13,403 | $ | 13,128 | ||||||||||
Effective
tax rate
|
29.6 | % | 27.7 | % | 36.6 | % | 36.2 | % | 33.9 | % | ||||||||||
Net
operating profit after tax (NOPAT) (1)
|
$ | 6,681 | $ | 8,766 | $ | 8,255 | $ | 8,551 | $ | 8,678 | ||||||||||
NOPAT
margin
|
4.8 | % | 6.1 | % | 5.7 | % | 5.6 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||
Capital
efficiency and returns
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
bearing debt
|
$ | 297,933 | $ | 300,413 | $ | 201,507 | $ | 210,284 | $ | 167,976 | ||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
$ | 269,008 | $ | 269,684 | $ | 282,880 | $ | 308,823 | $ | 330,392 | ||||||||||
Less:
Excess cash
|
$ | (235,421 | ) | $ | (200,620 | ) | $ | (117,611 | ) | $ | (129,638 | ) | $ | (83,462 | ) | |||||
Capital
base
|
$ | 331,520 | $ | 369,477 | $ | 366,776 | $ | 389,469 | $ | 414,906 | ||||||||||
Average
capital base
|
$ | 316,245 | $ | 350,499 | $ | 368,127 | $ | 378,123 | $ | 402,188 | ||||||||||
Capital
turnover (annualized)
|
1.75 | 1.63 | 1.58 | 1.61 | 1.62 | |||||||||||||||
Return
on capital (annualized) (1)
|
8.5 | % | 10.0 | % | 9.0 | % | 9.0 | % | 8.6 | % | ||||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment, net
|
$ | 45,328 | $ | 32,547 | $ | 25,589 | $ | 31,027 | $ | 26,024 | ||||||||||
Vendor
financed equipment purchases
|
$ | 23,009 | $ | 14,848 | $ | 11,683 | $ | 23,637 | $ | 20,664 | ||||||||||
Total
capital expenditures
|
$ | 68,337 | $ | 47,395 | $ | 37,272 | $ | 54,664 | $ | 46,688 | ||||||||||
Customer
gear
|
$ | 27,627 | $ | 23,073 | $ | 19,255 | $ | 32,448 | $ | 28,705 | ||||||||||
Data
center build outs
|
$ | 21,679 | $ | 14,240 | $ | 11,386 | $ | 13,914 | $ | 4,028 | ||||||||||
Office
build outs
|
$ | 11,227 | $ | 8,340 | $ | 2,239 | $ | 1,651 | $ | 5,432 | ||||||||||
Capitalized
software and other projects
|
$ | 7,804 | $ | 1,742 | $ | 4,392 | $ | 6,651 | $ | 8,523 | ||||||||||
Total
capital expenditures
|
$ | 68,337 | $ | 47,395 | $ | 37,272 | $ | 54,664 | $ | 46,688 | ||||||||||
Infrastructure
capacity and utilization
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Technical
square feet of data center space at period end **
|
136,962 | 134,923 | 157,523 | 177,371 | 167,821 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized
net revenue per average technical square foot **
|
$ | 4,093 | $ | 4,212 | $ | 3,969 | $ | 3,631 | $ | 3,764 | ||||||||||
Utilization
rate at period end
|
63.4 | % | 70.4 | % | 64.6 | % | 59.8 | % | 62.3 | % | ||||||||||
* Beginning
December 31, 2008 amounts include customers resulting from the Slicehost
acquisition, and beginning March 31, 2009 amounts
|
||||||||||||||||||||
include
SaaS customers for Jungle Disk.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
**
The technical square feet as of September 30, 2009 includes an additional
2,200 square feet for the Virginia data center less 11,750 square feet for
operations
|
||||||||||||||||||||
at
a U.K. data center that was decommissioned and migrated to the Slough data
center during the third quarter 2009.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(1)
See discussion and reconciliation of our Non-GAAP financial measures to
the most comparable GAAP measures.
|
- 19
-
Non-GAAP
Financial Measures
Return
on Capital (ROC) (Non-GAAP financial measure)
We define
Return on Capital as follows: ROC = Net operating profit after tax (NOPAT)
/Average capital base
NOPAT =
Income from operations x (1 – Effective tax rate)
Average
capital base = Average of (Interest bearing debt + stockholders’ equity – excess
cash) = Average of (Total assets – excess cash – accounts payables and accrued
expenses – deferred revenue– other non-current liabilities and deferred income
taxes)
Year-to-date
average balances are based on an average calculated using the quarter end
balances at the beginning of the period and all other quarter ending balances
included in the period.
For the
periods ending March 31, 2009 through September 30, 2009 we define excess cash
as the amount of cash and cash equivalents that exceeds our operating cash
requirements, which for these periods is calculated as three percent of our
annualized net revenue for the three months prior to the period
end. For prior periods, we defined excess cash as our investments in
money market funds. As a result of a decrease in capital requirements
due to the completion of the last phase of our DFW data center build out and
phase 2 of our Slough, U.K. data center, as well as the signing of leases to
occupy data centers that have minimal data center build out costs, our operating
cash needs have declined. We will periodically review the calculation
and adjust it to reflect our projected cash requirements for the upcoming
year.
We
believe that ROC is an important metric for investors in evaluating our
company’s performance. ROC relates to after-tax operating profits with the
capital that is placed into service. It is therefore a performance metric that
incorporates both the Statement of Income and the Balance Sheet. ROC measures
how successfully capital is deployed within a company.
Note that
ROC is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should not be
considered a substitute for return on assets, which we consider to be the most
directly comparable GAAP measure. ROC has limitations as an analytical tool, and
when assessing our operating performance, you should not consider ROC in
isolation, or as a substitute for other financial data prepared in accordance
with GAAP. Other companies may calculate ROC differently than we do, limiting
its usefulness as a comparative measure.
ROC
increased from 8.5% to 8.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2008
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to a
reduction of operating costs as a percentage of revenue due to a focus on
scaling our cost structure during 2008 and continuing into 2009, partially
offset by a lower tax rate favorably impacting the ROC calculation for the three
months ended September 30, 2008. Included in the average capital base
for 2008 and 2009 are capital expenditures related to the build out of our new
corporate headquarters facility and data centers.
Return on
assets increased from 3.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 to 4.7%
for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due
to higher revenue and net income, partially offset by growth in our asset base
due to the purchase of property and equipment to support the growth of our
business. In addition we have held additional amounts of cash and
cash equivalents since our IPO in August 2008.
- 20
-
See our
reconciliation of the calculation of return on assets to ROC in the following
table:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In
thousands, except financial metrics)
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2008
|
March
31,
2009
|
June
30,
2009
|
September
30,
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
$ | 9,490 | $ | 12,125 | $ | 13,021 | $ | 13,403 | $ | 13,128 | ||||||||||
Effective tax
rate
|
29.6 | % | 27.7 | % | 36.6 | % | 36.2 | % | 33.9 | % | ||||||||||
Net
operating profit after tax (NOPAT)
|
$ | 6,681 | $ | 8,766 | $ | 8,255 | $ | 8,551 | $ | 8,678 | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 5,235 | $ | 6,844 | $ | 6,588 | $ | 6,991 | $ | 7,604 | ||||||||||
Total
assets at period end
|
$ | 685,211 | $ | 685,261 | $ | 601,434 | $ | 656,793 | $ | 625,330 | ||||||||||
Less:
Excess cash
|
$ | (235,421 | ) | $ | (200,620 | ) | $ | (117,611 | ) | $ | (129,638 | ) | $ | (83,462 | ) | |||||
Less:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | (81,740 | ) | $ | (71,387 | ) | $ | (71,211 | ) | $ | (87,316 | ) | $ | (77,108 | ) | |||||
Less:
Deferred revenues (current and non-current)
|
$ | (20,055 | ) | $ | (20,167 | ) | $ | (20,374 | ) | $ | (20,011 | ) | $ | (18,222 | ) | |||||
Less:
Other non-current liabilities and deferred taxes
|
$ | (16,475 | ) | $ | (23,610 | ) | $ | (25,462 | ) | $ | (30,359 | ) | $ | (31,632 | ) | |||||
Capital
base
|
$ | 331,520 | $ | 369,477 | $ | 366,776 | $ | 389,469 | $ | 414,906 | ||||||||||
Average
total assets
|
$ | 546,761 | $ | 685,236 | $ | 643,348 | $ | 629,114 | $ | 641,062 | ||||||||||
Average
capital base
|
$ | 316,245 | $ | 350,499 | $ | 368,127 | $ | 378,123 | $ | 402,188 | ||||||||||
Return
on assets (annualized)
|
3.8 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.1 | % | 4.4 | % | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||
Return
on capital (annualized)
|
8.5 | % | 10.0 | % | 9.0 | % | 9.0 | % | 8.6 | % |
Adjusted
EBITDA (Non-GAAP financial measure)
We use
Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental measure to review and assess our
performance. We define Adjusted EBITDA as Net income, plus income
taxes, total other income (expense), depreciation and amortization, and non-cash
charges for share-based compensation.
Adjusted
EBITDA is a metric that is used in our industry by the investment community for
comparative and valuation purposes. We disclose this metric in order to support
and facilitate the dialogue with research analysts and investors.
Note that
Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and should
not be considered a substitute for operating income, which we consider to be the
most directly comparable GAAP measure. Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an
analytical tool, and when assessing our operating performance, you should not
consider Adjusted EBITDA in isolation, or as a substitute for net income or
other consolidated income statement data prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Other companies may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting
its usefulness as a comparative measure.
Adjusted
EBITDA as a percentage of net revenue has increased from 26.7% for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 to 31.7% for the three months ended September
30, 2009 due to revenue increasing at a faster rate than our operating costs,
partially offset by marginal increases in most cost categories.
Income
from operations has been favorably impacted by cost reduction efforts, but was
partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense resulting from
capital investments, and increasing share-based compensation expense from grants
of stock options and other stock awards to employees. Our operating income
margin increased from 6.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 to 8.1%
for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
- 21
-
See our
Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation below.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2008
|
March
31,
2009
|
June
30,
2009
|
September
30,
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
revenue
|
$ | 138,354 | $ | 143,137 | $ | 145,077 | $ | 151,995 | $ | 162,399 | ||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
$ | 9,490 | $ | 12,125 | $ | 13,021 | $ | 13,403 | $ | 13,128 | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 5,235 | $ | 6,844 | $ | 6,588 | $ | 6,991 | $ | 7,604 | ||||||||||
Plus:
Income taxes
|
$ | 2,199 | $ | 2,620 | $ | 3,807 | $ | 3,973 | $ | 3,900 | ||||||||||
Plus:
Total other (income) expense
|
$ | 2,056 | $ | 2,661 | $ | 2,626 | $ | 2,439 | $ | 1,624 | ||||||||||
Plus:
Depreciation and amortization
|
$ | 23,174 | $ | 26,310 | $ | 27,804 | $ | 29,711 | $ | 32,696 | ||||||||||
Plus:
Share-based compensation expense
|
$ | 4,317 | $ | 4,144 | $ | 4,237 | $ | 5,017 | $ | 5,612 | ||||||||||
Adjusted
EBITDA
|
$ | 36,981 | $ | 42,579 | $ | 45,062 | $ | 48,131 | $ | 51,436 | ||||||||||
Operating
income margin
|
6.9 | % | 8.5 | % | 9.0 | % | 8.8 | % | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||
Adjusted
EBITDA margin
|
26.7 | % | 29.7 | % | 31.1 | % | 31.7 | % | 31.7 | % |
- 22
-
Results
of Operations
The
following tables set forth our results of operations for the specified periods
and as a percentage of our revenue for those same periods. The period-to-period
comparison of financial results is not necessarily indicative of future
results.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited):
(In
thousands)
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2008
|
March
31,
2009
|
June
30,
2009
|
September
30,
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
revenue
|
$ | 138,354 | $ | 143,137 | $ | 145,077 | $ | 151,995 | $ | 162,399 | ||||||||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
45,499 | 45,019 | 46,210 | 48,235 | 53,093 | |||||||||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
21,462 | 21,447 | 20,502 | 19,080 | 19,860 | |||||||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
38,729 | 38,236 | 37,540 | 41,566 | 43,622 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
23,174 | 26,310 | 27,804 | 29,711 | 32,696 | |||||||||||||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
128,864 | 131,012 | 132,056 | 138,592 | 149,271 | |||||||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
9,490 | 12,125 | 13,021 | 13,403 | 13,128 | |||||||||||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,912 | ) | (3,153 | ) | (2,535 | ) | (2,172 | ) | (2,147 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest
and other income (expense)
|
(144 | ) | 492 | (91 | ) | (267 | ) | 523 | ||||||||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
(2,056 | ) | (2,661 | ) | (2,626 | ) | (2,439 | ) | (1,624 | ) | ||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
7,434 | 9,464 | 10,395 | 10,964 | 11,504 | |||||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
2,199 | 2,620 | 3,807 | 3,973 | 3,900 | |||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 5,235 | $ | 6,844 | $ | 6,588 | $ | 6,991 | $ | 7,604 | ||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Income, as a Percentage of Net Revenue (Unaudited):
(Percent
of net revenue)
|
September
30,
2008
|
December
31,
2008
|
March
31,
2009
|
June
30,
2009
|
September
30,
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
revenue
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Costs
and expenses
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
32.9 | % | 31.5 | % | 31.9 | % | 31.7 | % | 32.7 | % | ||||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
15.5 | % | 15.0 | % | 14.1 | % | 12.6 | % | 12.2 | % | ||||||||||
General
and administrative
|
28.0 | % | 26.7 | % | 25.9 | % | 27.3 | % | 26.9 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
16.7 | % | 18.4 | % | 19.2 | % | 19.5 | % | 20.1 | % | ||||||||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
93.1 | % | 91.5 | % | 91.0 | % | 91.2 | % | 91.9 | % | ||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
6.9 | % | 8.5 | % | 9.0 | % | 8.8 | % | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
-1.4 | % | -2.2 | % | -1.7 | % | -1.4 | % | -1.3 | % | ||||||||||
Interest
and other income (expense)
|
-0.1 | % | 0.3 | % | -0.1 | % | -0.2 | % | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
-1.5 | % | -1.9 | % | -1.8 | % | -1.6 | % | -1.0 | % | ||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
5.4 | % | 6.6 | % | 7.2 | % | 7.2 | % | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
1.6 | % | 1.8 | % | 2.6 | % | 2.6 | % | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
3.8 | % | 4.8 | % | 4.5 | % | 4.6 | % | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||
Due to
rounding, totals may not equal the sum of the line items in the table
above.
- 23
-
Third
Quarter 2009 Overview
To aid in
understanding our operating results for the periods covered by this report, we
have provided an executive overview and a summary of the significant events that
affected the most recent reporting period. These sections should be
read in conjunction with the other portions of management’s discussion and
analysis of our financial condition and results of operations, our “Risk
Factors” section, and our consolidated financial statements and notes included
in this report.
The
highlights and significant events of the three months ended September 30, 2009
and the impact on our operating results compared to the three months ended, June
30, 2009 were as follows:
Net Revenue - Net revenue
increased $10.4 million or 6.8% from $152.0 million in the three months ended
June 30, 2009 to $162.4 million in the three months ended September 30,
2009. The growth rate continued to be impacted by the broader
economic environment. Also, the market for hosting services continues
to be highly competitive and we face increasing competition from our existing
competitors as well as new market entrants resulting in downward pricing
pressure for some of our offerings. Partially offsetting the negative impact was
a weakening U.S. dollar relative to the pound sterling, which resulted in an
increase to revenue of approximately $2.4 million or 1.5% for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2009 with a
minimal impact to our margins as the majority of these customers are invoiced,
and substantially all of our expenses associated with these customers are paid,
by us or our subsidiaries in the functional currency of our company or our
subsidiaries, respectively. In addition, for the three months ended June 30,
2009, revenue was impacted by approximately $2.4 million in service credits
related to service interruptions in a portion of our Grapevine, Texas data
center. Customer revenue lost in the third quarter due to downgrades
and defection churn has been offset with customer upgrades and the addition of
new customers. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 we experienced a monthly
average churn rate of 1.0%, which slightly increased to 1.1% for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, while net upgrades remained flat at 1.2% for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009. Overall,
our installed base had growth at an average rate of 0.2% per month for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to growth at an average rate of 0.1%
for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Income from Operations -
Income from operations decreased $0.3 million or 2.2% from $13.4 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 to $13.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009. Operating income margin was 8.8% for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 8.1% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
Adjusted EBITDA -Adjusted
EBITDA increased $3.3 million or 6.9% from $48.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 to $51.4 million in the three months ended September 30,
2009. Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue was 31.7% for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and September 30, 2009. See the discussion of
Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure for additional
information.
Net Income and Net Income per Share
- Net income was $7.0 million, or $0.06 per share on a diluted basis for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to net income of $7.6 million, or
$0.06 per share on a diluted basis for the three months ended September 30,
2009. The increase in net income was mainly due to revenue
growth. Lower general and administrative expenses, and
sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenue, as well as a decrease
in other expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2009, were offset by an increase in cost of revenue,
and depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of
revenue.
In February
2009 and July 2009, Rackspace entered into agreements with DuPont Fabros
Technology to lease approximately 11,000 and 36,700 square feet of technical
square feet in a data center facility in the Northern Virginia area and the
Chicago area, respectively. Although we have made only minimal payments for the
Virginia lease and have not begun making payments for the Chicago lease, the
lease accounting rules require the lease costs to be amortized on a
straight-line basis beginning in the period that we have physical possession of
the property. We have already commenced operations in a portion of the
Virginia facility and expect to commence operations in the Chicago facility in
early 2010. Non-cash rent expense for these two facilities, which we
believe reflects the portion of the facilities that have not commenced
operations, was $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $1.9
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and is reflected in our
cost of revenue.
We continue
to make investments in our cloud computing division. During the three
months ended June 30, 2009, we released the specifications for our Cloud Servers
and Cloud Files APIs under the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution open source
license. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we
launched Cloud Tools, which is an online service for sharing tools, applications
and services built by our strategic partners and independent developers for The
Rackspace Cloud, and Rackspace Archiving, which enables our hosted email
customers to automatically keep a long-term backup of incoming and outgoing
email.
In July 2009,
we decommissioned operations at a U.K. data center with 11,750 technical square
feet due to the completion of the second phase of our data center build out at
our Slough, U.K. data center in June 2009.
Quarterly
Results of Operations (September 30, 2008 through September 30,
2009)
Revenue
has increased sequentially in each of the quarters primarily due to increased
volume of services provided, both due to an increasing number of customers over
time and due to incremental services rendered to existing customers. In the
three months ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009,
the growth rate was negatively impacted by the deteriorating economic conditions
and the strengthening U.S. dollar versus the pound sterling. For the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and the three months ended September 30, 2009,
we continued to be negatively impacted by the economic conditions and decreased
IT spend by our customers, but we experienced a favorable impact by a weakening
U.S. dollar versus the pound sterling. For the twelve month period ended
September 30, 2009, our average monthly growth in installed base was 0.1% per
month.
Because
of the growth of our revenue, total operating expenses increased sequentially in
each of the quarters presented. During the second half of 2008, we focused on
scaling our expenditures, which is evidenced in the reduction in sales and
marketing, and general and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenue. Sales and marketing continued to scale through 2009 as we
identified more efficient use of our sales resources. These
reductions were partially offset with increasing depreciation and amortization
expense resulting from equipment expenditures and facility additions to support
our customer growth. Rackspace completed strategic build outs during
this time period including the Slough, U.K. data center, in June 2008, the
completion of the third phase of our Grapevine, Texas data center in January
2009, and the second phase of our Slough U.K. data center in June 2009, as well
as capital expenditures related to the build out of a corporate
facility.
- 24
-
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2009
|
Net
Revenue
|
Our net
revenue was $138.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and
$162.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
$24.0 million, or 17.3%. Our increase in net revenue was primarily due to
increased volume of services provided, resulting from an increasing number of
customer accounts and incremental services rendered to existing customers.
Partially offsetting the revenue increase was the negative impact of a stronger
U.S. dollar relative to the pound sterling for the three months ended September
30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008. Net
revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2009 would have been
approximately $6.5 million higher had the U.S. dollar to the pound sterling
exchange rate remained constant from the prior year. Net revenue
includes non-recurring revenue of $4.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to $4.5 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009, a decrease of 2.0% as a result of decreased customer overage
charges.
|
Cost
of Revenue
|
Our cost
of revenue was $45.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, and
$53.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $7.6
million, or 16.7%. Of this increase, $2.4 million was attributable to an
increase in salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation expense. Total
compensation increased as a result of the hiring of data center and support
personnel to support our growth. The cost increase was further attributable to
an increase in license costs of $2.5 million and an increase in data center
costs of $1.6 million related to power and rent.
|
Sales
and Marketing Expenses
|
Our sales
and marketing expenses were $21.5 million for the three months ended September
30, 2008 and $19.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a
decrease of $1.6 million, or 7.4%. Of this decrease, $2.7 million was
attributable to advertising and Internet-related marketing expenditures, with a
focus on areas that generate more efficient growth opportunities. The
overall decrease was partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in salaries,
commissions, benefits, and share-based compensation expense. Total compensation
increased as a result of the hiring of additional sales and marketing personnel
and the impact of commissions associated with increased sales.
|
General
and Administrative Expenses
|
Our
general and administrative expenses were $38.7 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and $43.6 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009, an increase of $4.9 million, or 12.7%. Of this increase, $3.7 million
was attributable to an increase in salaries and benefits, of which share-based
compensation expense increased by $1.0 million as a result of stock option and
restricted stock unit grants to employees in 2008 and in the first nine months
of 2009. Bad debt expense increased by $1.2 million due to customers generally
extending payment terms or not being able to pay as a result of the current
economic conditions.
|
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
|
Our
depreciation and amortization expense was $23.2 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and $32.7 million for the three months ended September
30, 2009, an increase of $9.5 million, or 40.9%. The increase in depreciation
and amortization expense was a direct result of an increase in property and
equipment related to depreciable assets to support the growth of our business,
which included increases in data center equipment and leasehold improvements due
to data center build outs (primarily the expansion of our data center in
Grapevine, Texas and the opening, as well as expansion, of the data center in
Slough, U.K.) and internally developed and purchased software.
|
Other
Income (Expense)
|
Our
interest expense was $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008
and $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
$0.2 million or 10.5%. Interest expense was partially offset by
capitalized interest of $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009. Although we had an increased level of indebtedness in 2009,
interest expense did not increase significantly due to lower borrowing
rates.
Interest
and other income (expense) was $(0.1) million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized
$0.4 million in interest income and foreign currency losses of $(0.5)
million. In the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized
$0.1 million of interest income and $0.4 million of foreign currency
gains.
Income
Taxes
Our
effective tax rate increased from 29.6% for the three months ended September 30,
2008 to 33.9% for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. The differences between
our effective tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%
principally result from our geographical distribution of taxable income, state
income taxes, research and development credits, and permanent differences
between the book and tax treatment of certain items. Our foreign earnings are
generally taxed at lower rates than in the United States.
- 25
-
The
following tables set forth our results of operations for the specified periods
and as a percentage of our revenue for those same periods. The period-to-period
comparison of financial results is not necessarily indicative of future
results.
Consolidated
Statements of Income (Unaudited):
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
September
30, 2008
|
September
30, 2009
|
||||||
Net
revenue
|
$ | 388,796 | $ | 459,471 | ||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
127,564 | 147,538 | ||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
58,876 | 59,442 | ||||||
General
and administrative
|
110,470 | 122,728 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
63,862 | 90,211 | ||||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
360,772 | 419,919 | ||||||
Income
from operations
|
28,024 | 39,552 | ||||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(5,076 | ) | (6,854 | ) | ||||
Interest
and other income (expense)
|
276 | 165 | ||||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
(4,800 | ) | (6,689 | ) | ||||
Income
before income taxes
|
23,224 | 32,863 | ||||||
Income
taxes
|
8,365 | 11,680 | ||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 14,859 | $ | 21,183 | ||||
Consolidated
Statements of Income, as a Percentage of Net Revenue (Unaudited):
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
(Percent
of net revenue)
|
September
30, 2008
|
September
30, 2009
|
||||||
Net
revenue
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Costs
and expenses
|
||||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
32.8 | % | 32.1 | % | ||||
Sales
and marketing
|
15.1 | % | 12.9 | % | ||||
General
and administrative
|
28.4 | % | 26.7 | % | ||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
16.4 | % | 19.6 | % | ||||
Total
costs and expenses
|
92.8 | % | 91.4 | % | ||||
Income
from operations
|
7.2 | % | 8.6 | % | ||||
Other
income (expense)
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
-1.3 | % | -1.5 | % | ||||
Interest
and other income (expense)
|
0.1 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
Total
other income (expense)
|
-1.2 | % | -1.5 | % | ||||
Income
before income taxes
|
6.0 | % | 7.2 | % | ||||
Income
taxes
|
2.2 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||
Net
income
|
3.8 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||
Due to
rounding, totals may not equal the sum of the line items in the table
above.
- 26
-
Net
Revenue
Our net
revenue was $388.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
$459.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
$70.7 million, or 18.2%. Our increase in net revenue was primarily due to
increased volume of services provided, due to both an increasing number of
customers and incremental services rendered to existing customers.
Partially offsetting the revenue increase was the negative impact of a stronger
U.S. dollar relative to the pound sterling for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Net
revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, would have been
approximately $30 million higher had the U.S. dollar to the pound sterling
exchange rate remained constant from the prior year. Net revenue
includes non-recurring revenue of $13.9 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to $12.7 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009, a decrease of 8.7% as a result of decreased customer overage
charges.
|
Cost
of Revenue
|
Our cost
of revenue was $127.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
$147.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
$20.0 million, or 15.6%. Of this increase, $7.0 million was attributable to an
increase in salaries, benefits, and share-based compensation expense. Total
compensation increased as a result of the hiring of data center and support
personnel to support our growth. The cost increase was further attributable to
an increase in license costs of $9.1 million and an increase in data center
costs of $3.8 million related to power and bandwidth.
Sales
and Marketing Expenses
Our sales
and marketing expenses were $58.9 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and $59.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an
increase of $0.5 million, or 0.8%. Of this increase, $5.3 million was
attributable to an increase in salaries, commissions, benefits, and share-based
compensation expense. Total compensation increased as a result of the hiring of
additional sales and marketing personnel and the impact of commissions
associated with increased sales. Partially offsetting the increase was a $4.7
million decrease to advertising and Internet-related marketing expenditures as a
result of a concentrated effort to decrease marketing spend, with a focus on
areas that generate more efficient growth opportunities.
|
General
and Administrative Expenses
|
Our
general and administrative expenses were $110.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and $122.7 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009, an increase of $12.2 million, or 11.0%. Of this increase, $6.9 million
was attributable to an increase in salaries and benefits, of which share-based
compensation expense increased by $3.0 million as a result of stock option and
restricted stock unit grants to employees in 2008 and in the first nine months
of 2009. Bad debt expense increased $4.6 million due to customers generally
extending payment terms or not being able pay as a result of the current
economic conditions. We also experienced increases in internal software support
and maintenance of $1.3 million. Partially offsetting these increases were
decreases to travel expenditures of $1.1 million.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
Our
depreciation and amortization expense was $63.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and $90.2 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2009, an increase of $26.3 million, or 41.2%. The increase in depreciation
and amortization expense was a direct result of an increase in property and
equipment related to depreciable assets including increases in data center
equipment and leasehold improvements due to data center build outs (primarily
the expansion of our data center in Grapevine, Texas and the opening, as well as
expansion, of the data center in Slough, U.K.) and internally developed and
purchased software, as well as intangible assets acquired through
acquisitions.
|
Other
Income (Expense)
|
Our
interest expense was $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and $6.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of
$1.8 million, or 35.3%. This relative increase was primarily due to
the increased level of indebtedness, which was mostly offset by decreased
borrowing rates. Interest expense was partially offset by capitalized
interest of $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and $0.7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Interest
and other income (expense) was $0.3 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized $0.9
million in interest income partially offset by foreign currency losses of $(0.6)
million. In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recognized $0.2 million
of interest income.
Income
Taxes
Our effective tax rate was decreased
from 36.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to 35.5% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, primarily as a result of a larger portion of our earnings being realized in countries
where we have lower statutory rates than compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The differences between our effective
tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% principally result from
our geographical distribution of taxable income, state income taxes, research
and development credits, and permanent differences between the book and tax
treatment of certain items. Our foreign earnings are generally taxed at lower
rates than in the United States.
- 27
-
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2009, our
cash and cash equivalents balance was $103.0 million. We use our cash and
cash equivalents, cash flow from operations, capital leases, and existing
amounts available under our revolving credit facility as our primary sources of
liquidity. We believe that internally generated cash flows, along
with cash and cash equivalents currently available to us, are sufficient to
support business operations and capital expenditures, in addition to a
level of discretionary investments.
In June
2009, we amended our revolving credit facility agreement to provide us the
ability to borrow from our credit facility in pounds sterling and euros, rather
than restricting borrowings to U.S. dollars. We are limited to borrowings of $75
million in alternate currencies. The option to borrow in other foreign
currencies will provide protection against fluctuations in currencies in the
countries in which we do business.
We
maintain debt levels that we establish through consideration of a number of
factors, including cash flow expectations, cash requirements for operations,
investment plans (including acquisitions), and our overall cost of capital.
Outstanding debt under our line of credit decreased from $200.0 million as of
December 31, 2008 to $50.0 million at September 30, 2009. The
decrease in amounts outstanding under our line of credit was due to the
repayment of $150.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As of
September 30, 2009, we had an additional $194.3 million available for future
borrowings.
We have
vendor finance arrangements in the form of leases and notes payable with our
major vendors that permit us to finance our purchases of data center
equipment. As of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009, we had
$100.4 million and $118.0 million outstanding with respect to these
arrangements. We believe our borrowings from these arrangements will
continue to be available and, as long as they are competitive, we will continue
to finance purchases through these arrangements.
Capital
Expenditure Requirements
For the
full year of 2009, we expect to have total capital expenditures of approximately
$185 million, including $110 million dollars for customer gear, $35 million for
data centers, $15 million for office space, and $25 million for capitalized
software and other.
Our
available cash and cash equivalents are held in bank deposits, overnight sweep
accounts, and money market funds. Our money market mutual funds invest
exclusively in high-quality, short-term securities that are issued or guaranteed
by the U.S. government or by U.S. government agencies. We actively
monitor the third-party depository institutions that hold our cash and cash
equivalents. Our emphasis is primarily on safety of principal while secondarily
maximizing yield on those funds. The balances may exceed the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation or “FDIC” insurance limits or are not insured by the
FDIC. While we monitor the balances in our accounts and adjust the
balances as appropriate, these balances could be impacted if the underlying
depository institutions fail or could be subject to other adverse conditions in
the financial markets. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack of access to
our invested cash and cash equivalents; however, we can provide no assurances
that access to our funds will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the
financial markets.
We
currently believe that current cash and cash equivalents, cash generated by
operations, as well as available borrowings through vendor financing
arrangements and our credit facility will be sufficient to meet our operating
and capital needs in the foreseeable future. Our long-term future
capital requirements will depend on many factors, most importantly our growth of
revenue, and our investments in new technologies and services. Our ability to
generate cash depends on our financial performance, general economic conditions,
technology trends and developments, and other factors. We could be required, or
could elect, to seek additional funding in the form of debt or
equity.
The
following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods
indicated:
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
September
30, 2008
|
September
30, 2009
|
||||||
Cash
provided by operating activities
|
$ | 102,213 | $ | 131,204 | ||||
Cash
used in investing activities
|
$ | (132,849 | ) | $ | (89,462 | ) | ||
Cash
provided by (used in) financing activities
|
$ | 266,879 | $ | (179,045 | ) | |||
Acquisition
of property and equipment by capital
leases
and equipment notes payable
|
$ | 70,642 | $ | 55,984 |
- 28
-
Operating
Activities
Net cash
provided by operating activities is primarily a function of our profitability,
the amount of non-cash charges included in our profitability, and our working
capital management. Net cash provided by operating activities was $102.2 million
in the first nine months of 2008 compared to $131.2 million in the first nine
months of 2009, an increase of $29.0 million or 28.4%. Net income increased from
$14.9 million in the first nine months of 2008 to $21.2 million in the first
nine months of 2009. A summary of the significant changes in non-cash
adjustments affecting net income and changes in assets and liabilities impacting
operating cash flows is as follows:
•
Depreciation and amortization expense was $63.9 million in the first nine months
of 2008 compared to $90.2 million in the first nine months of
2009. The increase in depreciation and amortization was due to the
purchases of servers, networking gear and computer software (internally
developed technology), and leasehold improvements, as well as amortization of
intangibles related to acquisitions.
• Our
provision for bad debts and customer credits increased from $2.3 million in the
first nine months of 2008 to $8.8 million in the first nine months of 2009 due
to certain customers’ inability to pay as a result of the current economic
conditions.
•
Share-based compensation expense was $10.9 million in the first nine months of
2008 compared to $14.9 million in the first nine months of 2009. The
increase in expense was due to stock options and restricted stock units granted
in 2008 and the first nine months of 2009.
• The
change in accounts receivable was a cash outflow of $5.4 million in the first
nine months of 2008 compared to a cash outflow of $17.0 million in the first
nine months of 2009. Our accounts receivable balance has increased
during the first nine months of 2009 as a result of increased sales and slower
customer payment patterns that are being influenced by the current economic
conditions.
• The
change in income taxes receivable was a cash outflow of $10.8 million in the
first nine months of 2008 compared to a cash inflow of $8.2 million in the first
nine months of 2009. As we anticipated a net loss for tax in 2008,
the September 30, 2008 balance sheet included an income tax receivable for a
carryback claim for our loss. We received federal income tax refunds
totaling $10.1 million in 2009, related to the 2008 tax period.
• The
change in accounts payable and accrued expenses created a $17.7 million cash
inflow in the first nine months of 2008 compared to a $2.6 million cash inflow
in the first nine months of 2009. The changes resulted from the
timing of payments for trade payables.
Investing
Activities
Net cash used
in investing activities was primarily capital expenditures to meet the demands
of our growing customer base. Historically our main investing activities have
consisted of purchases of IT equipment for our data center infrastructure,
furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements to support our
operations.
Our net cash
used in investing activities was $132.8 million for the first nine months of
2008 compared to $89.5 million for the first nine months of 2009, a decrease of
$43.3 million, or 32.6%.
We also
purchase equipment through capital lease arrangements and other types of vendor
financing that do not require an initial outlay of cash. Purchases
through these arrangements decreased from $70.6 million for the first nine
months of 2008 to $56.0 million for the first nine months of 2009.
The combined
total for cash and non-cash capital expenditures for property and equipment
decreased from $203.5 million for the first nine months of 2008 to $138.6
million for the first nine months of 2009. Of the 2009 amount, $80.4 million was
used to purchase dedicated customer equipment, $29.3 million for data center
build outs, $9.3 million related to build out of office space and $19.6 million
was invested in capitalized software, including internally developed software
that is focused on improving our service offerings, and other purchases. The
decrease in combined capital expenditures resulted primarily from a decline of
$36.3 million in data center build outs and $23.6 million from office build
outs, which mostly resulted from the renovations for our headquarters facility
in 2008.
Financing
Activities
Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities was $266.9 million for the first nine
months of 2008 compared to $(179.0) million for the first nine months of 2009, a
change of $445.9 million. This was due primarily to $142.7 million in net
advances on our revolving credit facility for the first nine months of 2008
compared to repayments of $150.0 million on our revolving credit facility in the
first nine months of 2009. Principal payments on capital leases and notes
payable were $28.4 million for the first nine months of 2008 compared to $38.4
million for the first nine months of 2009. In addition, proceeds from
exercises of stock options and the related excess tax benefits increased by $4.6
million in the first nine months of 2009.
- 29
-
Contractual
Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies
The
following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2009
(unaudited):
(In
thousands)
|
Total
|
2009
|
2010-2011 | 2012-2013 |
2014
and Beyond
|
|||||||||||||||
Capital
leases (1)
|
$ | 117,225 | $ | 12,082 | $ | 86,618 | $ | 18,525 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
243,607 | 4,075 | 35,697 | 41,227 | 162,608 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase
commitments
|
5,839 | 1,086 | 4,222 | 531 | - | |||||||||||||||
Revolving
credit facility (2)
|
50,000 | - | - | 50,000 | - | |||||||||||||||
Software
and equipment notes (2)
|
8,505 | 651 | 6,974 | 880 | - | |||||||||||||||
Total
contractual obligations
|
$ | 425,176 | $ | 17,894 | $ | 133,511 | $ | 111,163 | $ | 162,608 | ||||||||||
(1)
Represents principal and interest.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(2)
Represents principal only.
|
Leases
Capital
and finance method leases are primarily related to expenditures for IT
equipment. Our operating leases are primarily for data center facilities
and, to a lesser extent, office space.
In July
2009, Rackspace entered into an agreement to lease approximately 36,700 raised
square feet and approximately 10,000 square feet of office and storage space in
a data center facility in the Chicago area. The operating lease has a term of 15
years from the commencement date. Rackspace has a one-time option to terminate
the lease after ten years subject to a penalty, as well as upon expiration of
the lease, to renew the lease for two successive five year periods.
Purchase
commitments
Our
purchase commitments are primarily related to bandwidth for our data
centers.
Revolving
Credit Facility
We have a
credit facility with a committed amount of $245.0 million. As of September 30,
2009, we had $50.0 million of revolving loans outstanding and a $0.7 million
letter of credit outstanding under the credit facility, and $194.3 million
available for future borrowings.
In
December 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement converting a
portion of our interest rate exposure from a floating rate basis to a fixed rate
of 4.135% per annum. The interest rate swap agreement has a notional amount of
$50.0 million and matures in December 2010.
Software
and Equipment Notes
We
finance certain software and equipment from third-party vendors. The terms of
these arrangements are generally one to five years.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
During
the periods presented, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as
structured finance or special purpose entities or any other entity defined as
such within ASC Topic 810, Consolidation (formerly FASB
Interpretation No. 46 (Revised 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities—An Interpretation of ARB No. 51). These entities are
typically established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
We have
entered into various indemnification arrangements with third parties, including
vendors, customers, landlords, our officers and directors, stockholders of
acquired companies, and third parties to whom and from whom we license
technology. Generally, these indemnification agreements require us to reimburse
losses suffered by third parties due to various events, such as lawsuits arising
from patent or copyright infringement or our negligence. Certain of these
agreements require us to indemnify the other party against certain claims
relating to property damage, personal injury or the acts or omissions by us, our
employees, agents or representatives. To date, there have been no claims against
us or our customers pertaining to such indemnification provisions and no amounts
have been recorded.
These
indemnification obligations are considered off-balance sheet arrangements in
accordance with ASC Topic 460, Guarantees (formerly FASB Interpretation 45,
Guarantor’s Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others). To date, we have not encountered material costs
as a result of such obligations and have not accrued any liabilities related to
such indemnification obligations in our financial statements.
- 30
-
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. In many
cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically
dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application,
while in other cases, significant judgment is required in making estimates, and
selecting among available alternative accounting standards that allow different
accounting treatment for similar transactions. These judgments and estimates
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses
and related disclosures. We consider these policies requiring significant
management judgment and estimates used in the preparation of our financial
statements to be critical accounting policies.
We review
our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis, including those related to
revenue recognition, service credits, allowance for doubtful accounts, property
and equipment, goodwill and intangibles, contingencies, the fair valuation of
stock related to share-based compensation, software development, and income
taxes.
We base
our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances to determine the carrying
values of assets and liabilities. In many instances, we could have reasonably
used different accounting estimates, and in other instances changes in the
accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period-to-period.
Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made
by our management. To the extent that there are material differences between
these estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be
affected. We believe the following accounting policies to be critical
to the judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial
statements.
• Revenue
recognition;
•
Valuation of accounts receivable and service credits;
•
Property, equipment, and other long lived assets;
•
Goodwill and intangible assets;
•
Contingencies;
•
Share-based compensation;
•
Software development; and
• Income
taxes.
A
description of our critical accounting policies that involve significant
management judgment appears in our Annual Report filed on Form 10-K filed with
the SEC on March 2, 2009, as amended under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting
Policies.”
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
For a full description of new
accounting pronouncements, including the respective dates of adoption and impact
on results of operation and financial condition, see Note 2 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
- 31
-
ITEM
3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Power
Prices. We are a large consumer of
power. During the first nine months of 2009, we expensed
approximately $13.2 million that was paid to utility companies to power our data
centers, representing 2.9% of our net revenue. Because we anticipate further
revenue growth for the foreseeable future, we expect to consume more power in
the future. Power costs vary by geography, the source of power generation,
seasonal fluctuations, and are subject to certain proposed legislation that may
increase our exposure to increased power costs. Our largest exposure to energy
prices based on consumption currently exists at our Grapevine, Texas data center
in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, a deregulated energy market. In August 2008, we
entered into a fixed price contract with a provider of electricity for power for
our Grapevine data center. The contract allows the company to periodically
convert the price to a floating market price during the
arrangement. The contract is for 19 months, and allows the provider
an option to extend the contract for an additional 19 months. Also,
in June 2009, we entered into a fixed price contract for 12 months for our
Slough U.K. data center.
Interest
Rates. Our main credit facility is a revolving
line of credit with a base rate determined by the London Interbank Offered Rate,
or LIBOR. This market rate of interest is fluctuating and exposes our interest
expense to risk. Our credit agreement obligates us to hedge part of that
interest rate risk with appropriate instruments, such as interest rate swaps or
interest rate options. On December 10, 2007, we entered into an at-the-market
fixed-payer interest rate swap with a notional amount of $50.0 million at an
annual rate of 4.135%. This swap essentially fixes the rate we pay on the first
$50.0 million outstanding on our revolving credit facility. As we borrow more,
we may enter into additional swaps to continuously control our interest rate
risk. Generally, we do not hedge our complete exposure. As a result, we may be
exposed to interest rate risk on the un-hedged portion of our
borrowings. For example, a 100 basis point increase in LIBOR would
increase the interest expense on $10 million of borrowings that are not hedged
by $0.1 million annually. As of September 30, 2009 we did not
have exposure to interest rate risk as we only had $50.0 million outstanding on
our revolving credit facility.
Leases. The
majority of our purchases of customer gear are vendor financed through capital
leases with fixed payment terms generally over three to five years, coinciding
with the depreciation period of the equipment. As of September 30,
2009, we have a liability for these leases of $109.5 million on our consolidated
balance sheet, of which $46.4 million is classified as
current. Although we believe our borrowings from these arrangements
will continue to be available, we have exposure that vendor financing may no
longer be available or the borrowing rates, which are fixed rates, may
increase.
Foreign
Currencies. The majority of our customers are
invoiced, and substantially all of our expenses are paid, by us or our
subsidiaries in the functional currency of our company or our subsidiaries,
respectively. A relatively insignificant amount of customers are invoiced in
currencies other than the applicable functional currency, such as the euro.
Therefore, our results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates. We also have exposure to foreign
currency transaction gains and losses as the result of certain receivables due
from our foreign subsidiaries, which are denominated in both the U.S. dollar and
the pound sterling. During the first nine months of 2009, we
recognized foreign currency losses of $(0.2) million within other income
(expense). We have not entered into any currency hedging contracts,
although we may do so in the future. We recently amended our revolving credit
facility agreement to provide us the ability to borrow from our credit facility
in pounds sterling and euros, rather than restricting borrowings to U.S.
dollars. We currently do not have borrowings in any alternative currencies from
our credit facility. As we grow our international operations, our exposure to
foreign currency risk could become more significant.
- 32
-
ITEM 4. - CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our senior management, including our
chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as amended, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on this
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded as
of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective such that the information relating to the Company, including our
consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes
in internal control over financial reporting
There
were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during our
most recent fiscal quarter reporting period identified in connection with
management’s evaluation as required and defined by paragraph (d) of Rules 12a-15
and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
The SEC,
as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, adopted rules
requiring every company that files reports with the SEC to include a management
report on such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual
report. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm must
attest to our internal control over financial reporting. Our first annual report
on Form 10-K did not include a report of management’s assessment regarding
internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report from our
independent registered public accounting firm due to a transition period
established by SEC rules applicable to newly public companies. Management will
be required to provide an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Controls
Our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will
prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived
and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in
all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance
that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have
been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments
in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a
simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is also
based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
- 33
-
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are
party to various legal and administrative proceedings, which we consider routine
and incidental to our business. In addition, on October 22, 2008, Benjamin E. Rodriguez D/B/A
Management and Business Advisors vs. Rackspace Hosting, Inc. and Graham
Weston, was filed in the 37th
District Court in Bexar County Texas by a former consultant to the company,
Benjamin E. Rodriguez. The suit alleges breach of an oral agreement to issue Mr.
Rodriguez a 1% interest in our stock in the form of options or warrants for
compensation for services he was engaged to perform for us. We believe that the
plaintiff’s position is without merit and intend to vigorously defend this
lawsuit. We do not expect the results of this claim or any other current
proceeding to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations or financial condition.
ITEM
IA – RISK FACTORS
Risks
Related to Our Business and Industry
Our
physical infrastructure is concentrated in a few facilities and any failure in
our physical infrastructure or services could lead to significant costs and
disruptions and could reduce our revenue, harm our business reputation and have
a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Our network, power supplies and data
centers are subject to various points of failure, problems with our cooling
equipment, generators, uninterruptible power supply, or UPS, routers, switches,
or other equipment, whether or not within our control, could result in service
interruptions for some or all of our customers as well as equipment
damage. Because our hosting services do not require geographic
proximity of our data centers to our customers, our hosting infrastructure is
consolidated into a few large facilities. While data backup services and
disaster recovery services are available as a part of our hosting services
offerings, the majority of our customers do not elect to pay the additional fees
required to have disaster recovery services store their backup data offsite in a
separate facility, which could substantially mitigate the adverse effect to a
customer from a single data center failure. Accordingly, any failure or downtime
in one of our data center facilities could affect a significant percentage of
our customers. The total destruction or severe impairment of any of our data
center facilities could result in significant downtime of our services and the
loss of customer data. Since our ability to attract and retain customers depends
on our ability to provide customers with highly reliable service, even minor
interruptions in our service could harm our reputation. The services we provide
are subject to failure resulting from numerous factors, including:
|
■
|
Power
loss;
|
|
■
|
Equipment
failure;
|
|
■
|
Human
error or accidents;
|
|
■
|
Sabotage
and vandalism;
|
|
■
|
Failure
by us or our vendors to provide adequate service or maintenance to our
equipment;
|
|
■
|
Network
connectivity downtime;
|
|
■
|
Improper
building maintenance by the landlords of the buildings in which our
facilities are located;
|
|
■
|
Physical
or electronic security breaches;
|
|
■
|
Fire,
earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood, and other natural
disasters;
|
|
■
|
Water
damage; and
|
|
■
|
Terrorism.
|
Additionally,
in connection with the expansion or consolidation of our existing data center
facilities from time to time, there is an increased risk that service
interruptions may occur as a result of server relocation or other unforeseen
construction-related issues.
- 34
-
We have
experienced interruptions in service in the past, due to such things as power
outages, power equipment failures, cooling equipment failures, routing problems,
hard drive failures, database corruption, system failures, software failures,
and other computer failures. For example, during the second quarter of 2009,
portions of our data center in Grapevine, Texas experienced certain service
interruptions due to power system failures. These system failures resulted in
downtime for a portion of the servers located in the facility. As a result of
the downtime, we extended approximately $2.4 million in service credits to our
customers and our reputation may have suffered. While we have not experienced
larger than normal customer attrition following these events, the extent to
which our reputation suffered is difficult to assess. We have taken and are
continuing to take certain steps to avoid this situation in the future including
upgrades to our electrical and mechanical infrastructure. However, service
interruptions due to equipment failures, power outages, natural disasters,
accidents, or otherwise could still materially impact our business.
Any
future interruptions could:
|
■
|
Cause
our customers to seek damages for losses
incurred;
|
|
■
|
Require
us to replace existing equipment or add redundant
facilities;
|
|
■
|
Affect
our reputation as a reliable provider of hosting
services;
|
|
■
|
Cause
existing customers to cancel or elect to not renew their contracts;
or
|
|
■
|
Make
it more difficult for us to attract new
customers.
|
Any of
these events could materially increase our expenses or reduce our revenue, which
would have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Customers
with mission-critical applications could potentially expose us to lawsuits for
their lost profits or damages, which could impair our financial
condition.
Because
our hosting services are critical to many of our customers’ businesses, any
significant disruption in our services could result in lost profits or other
indirect or consequential damages to our customers. Although we require our
customers to sign agreements that contain provisions attempting to limit our
liability for service outages, we cannot assure you that a court would enforce
any contractual limitations on our liability in the event that one of our
customers brings a lawsuit against us as the result of a service interruption or
other Internet site or application problems that they may ascribe to us. The
outcome of any such lawsuit would depend on the specific facts of the case and
any legal and policy considerations that we may not be able to mitigate. In such
cases, we could be liable for substantial damage awards that may exceed our
liability insurance coverage by unknown but significant amounts, which could
materially impair our financial condition.
We
provide service level commitments to our customers, which could require us to
issue credits for future services if the stated service levels are not met for a
given period and could significantly decrease our revenue and harm our
reputation.
Our
customer agreements provide that we maintain certain service level commitments
to our customers relating primarily to network uptime, critical infrastructure
availability, and hardware replacement. If we are unable to meet the stated
service level commitments, we may be contractually obligated to provide these
customers with credits for future services. As a result, a failure to deliver
services for a relatively short duration could cause us to issue these credits
to a large number of affected customers. In addition, we cannot be assured that
our customers will accept these credits in lieu of other legal remedies that may
be available to them. Our failure to meet our commitments could also result in
substantial customer dissatisfaction or loss. Because of the loss of future
revenue through these credits, potential customer loss and other potential
liabilities, our revenue could be significantly impacted if we cannot meet our
service level commitments to our customers.
If
we fail to hire and retain qualified employees and management personnel, our
growth strategy and our operating results could be harmed.
Our
growth strategy depends on our ability to identify, hire, train, and retain
executives, IT professionals, technical engineers, operations employees, and
sales and senior management personnel who maintain relationships with our
customers and who can provide the technical, strategic, and marketing skills
required for our company to grow. There is a shortage of qualified personnel in
these fields, specifically in the San Antonio, Texas area, where we are
headquartered and a majority of our employees are located. We compete with other
companies for this limited pool of potential employees. There is no assurance
that we will be able to recruit or retain qualified personnel, and this failure
could cause our operations and financial results to be negatively
impacted.
Our
success and future growth also depends to a significant degree on the skills and
continued services of our management team, especially Graham Weston, our
Chairman, and A. Lanham Napier, our Chief Executive Officer and President. We do
not have long-term employment agreements with any members of our management
team, including Messrs. Weston and Napier. Mr. Napier is the only member of our
management team on whom we maintain key man insurance.
If
we are unable to maintain a high level of customer service, customer
satisfaction and demand for our services could suffer.
We
believe that our success depends on our ability to provide customers with
quality service that not only meets our stated commitments, but meets and then
exceeds customer service expectations. If we are unable to provide customers
with quality customer support in a variety of areas, we could face customer
dissatisfaction, decreased overall demand for our services, and loss of revenue.
In addition, our inability to meet customer service expectations may damage our
reputation and could consequently limit our ability to retain existing customers
and attract new customers, which would adversely affect our ability to generate
revenue and negatively impact our operating results.
- 35
-
Our
existing customers could elect to reduce or terminate the services they purchase
from us because we do not have long-term contracts with our customers, which
could adversely affect our operating results.
Customer
contracts for our services typically have initial terms of one to two years
which, unless terminated, may be renewed or automatically extended on a
month-to-month basis. Our customers have no obligation to renew their services
after their initial contract periods expire. Moreover, our customers could
cancel their service agreements before they expire. Our costs associated with
maintaining revenue from existing customers are generally much lower than costs
associated with generating revenue from new customers. Therefore, a reduction in
revenue from our existing customers, even if offset by an increase in revenue
from new customers, could reduce our operating margins. Any failure by us to
continue to retain our existing customers could have a material adverse effect
on our operating results.
Our
corporate culture has contributed to our success, and if we cannot maintain this
culture, we could lose the innovation, creativity, and teamwork fostered by our
culture, and our operating results may be harmed.
We
believe that a critical contributor to our success has been our corporate
culture, which we believe fosters innovation, creativity, and teamwork. If we
implement more complex organizational management structures because of growth or
other structural changes, we may find it increasingly difficult to maintain the
beneficial aspects of our corporate culture. This could negatively impact our
future operating results. In addition, being a publicly traded company may
create disparities in personal wealth among our employees, which may adversely
impact our corporate culture and employee relations.
If
we are unable to manage our growth effectively, our financial results could
suffer and our stock price could decline.
The
growth of our business and our service offerings has strained our operating and
financial resources. Further, we intend to continue expanding our overall
business, customer base, headcount, and operations. Creating a global
organization and managing a geographically dispersed workforce requires
substantial management effort and significant additional investment in our
operating and financial system capabilities and controls. If our information
systems are unable to support the demands placed on them by our growth, we may
be forced to implement new systems which would be disruptive to our business. We
may be unable to manage our expenses effectively in the future due to the
expenses associated with these expansions, which may negatively impact our gross
margins or operating expenses. If we fail to improve our operational systems or
to expand our customer service capabilities to keep pace with the growth of our
business, we could experience customer dissatisfaction, cost inefficiencies, and
lost revenue opportunities, which may materially and adversely affect our
operating results.
If
we are unable to adapt to evolving technologies and customer demands in a timely
and cost-effective manner, our ability to sustain and grow our business may
suffer.
Our
market is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry
standards, and frequent new product announcements, all of which impact the way
hosting services are marketed and delivered. These characteristics are magnified
by the continued rapid growth of the Internet and the intense competition in our
industry. To be successful, we must adapt to our rapidly changing market by
continually improving the performance, features, and reliability of our services
and modifying our business strategies accordingly. We could also incur
substantial costs if we need to modify our services or infrastructure in order
to adapt to these changes. For example, our data center infrastructure could
require improvements due to the development of new systems to deliver power to
or eliminate heat from the servers we house or as a result of the development of
new server technologies that require levels of critical load and heat removal
that our facilities are not designed to provide. We may not be able to timely
adapt to changing technologies, if at all. Our ability to sustain and grow our
business would suffer if we fail to respond to these changes in a timely and
cost-effective manner.
New
technologies or industry standards have the potential to replace or provide
lower cost alternatives to our hosting services. The adoption of such new
technologies or industry standards could render some or all of our services
obsolete or unmarketable. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to identify
the emergence of all of these new service alternatives successfully, modify our
services accordingly, or develop and bring new products and services to market
in a timely and cost-effective manner to address these changes. If
and when we do identify the emergence of new service alternatives and bring new
products and services to market, those new products and services may need to be
made available at lower price points than our then-current services. For
example, a current managed hosting customer may determine that all or part of
their service can be delivered through our cloud computing offerings at a much
lower price point.
Our
failure to provide services to compete with new technologies or the obsolescence
of our services could lead us to lose current and potential customers or could
cause us to incur substantial costs, which would harm our operating results and
financial condition. Our introduction of new service alternative
products and services that have lower price points than current offerings may
result in our existing customers switching to the lower cost products, which
could reduce our revenue and have a material, adverse effect of our operating
results.
- 36
-
We
may not be able to continue to add new customers and increase sales to our
existing customers, which could adversely affect our operating
results.
Our
growth is dependent on our ability to continue to attract new customers while
retaining and expanding our service offerings to existing customers. Growth in
the demand for our services may be inhibited and we may be unable to sustain
growth in our customer base for a number of reasons, such as:
|
■
|
A
reduction in the demand for our services due to the economic
recession;
|
|
■
|
Our
inability to market our services in a cost-effective manner to new
customers;
|
|
■
|
The
inability of our customers to differentiate our services from those of our
competitors or our inability to effectively communicate such
distinctions;
|
|
■
|
Our
inability to successfully communicate the benefits of hosting to
businesses;
|
|
■
|
The
decision of businesses to host their Internet sites and web infrastructure
internally or in colocation facilities as an alternative to the use of our
hosting services;
|
|
■
|
Our
inability to penetrate international
markets;
|
|
■
|
Our
inability to expand our sales to existing
customers;
|
|
■
|
Our
inability to strengthen awareness of our brand;
and
|
|
■
|
Reliability,
quality or compatibility problems with our
services.
|
A
substantial amount of our past revenue growth was derived from purchases of
service upgrades by existing customers. Our costs associated with increasing
revenue from existing customers are generally lower than costs associated with
generating revenue from new customers. Therefore, a reduction in the rate of
revenue increase or a rate of revenue decrease from our existing customers, even
if offset by an increase in revenue from new customers, could reduce our
operating margins. Any failure by us to continue attracting new customers or
grow our revenue from existing customers for a prolonged period of time could
have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
We may not be
able to compete successfully against current and future
competitors.
The
market for hosting services is highly competitive. We expect to face additional
competition from our existing competitors as well as new market entrants in the
future.
Our
current and potential competitors vary by size, service offerings and geographic
region. These competitors may elect to partner with each other or with focused
companies like us to grow their businesses. They include:
|
■
|
Do-it-yourself
solutions with a colocation partner such as AT&T, Equinix, SAVVIS,
Switch & Data, and other telecommunications
companies;
|
|
■
|
IT
outsourcing providers such as CSC, EDS, and
IBM;
|
|
■
|
Hosting
providers such as AT&T, Pipex, SAVVIS, Terremark, The Planet, and
Verio; and
|
|
■
|
Large
Internet companies such as Microsoft, Google, and
Amazon.
|
The
primary competitive factors in our market are: customer service and technical
expertise; security reliability and functionality; reputation and brand
recognition; financial strength; breadth of services offered; and
price.
Many of
our current and potential competitors have substantially greater financial,
technical and marketing resources, larger customer bases, longer operating
histories, greater brand recognition, and more established relationships in the
industry than we do. As a result, some of these competitors may be able
to:
|
■
|
Develop
superior products or services, gain greater market acceptance, and expand
their service offerings more efficiently or more
rapidly;
|
|
■
|
Adapt
to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements more
quickly;
|
|
■
|
Bundle
hosting services with other services they provide at reduced
prices;
|
|
■
|
Take
advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more
readily;
|
|
■
|
Adopt
more aggressive pricing policies and devote greater resources to the
promotion, marketing, and sales of their services;
and
|
|
■
|
Devote
greater resources to the research and development of their products and
services.
|
- 37
-
If
we do not prevent security breaches, we may be exposed to lawsuits, lose
customers, suffer harm to our reputation, and incur additional
costs.
Our
internal infrastructure has limited security controls in place, which may affect
our ability to protect our equipment and hardware against security breaches. The
services we offer involve the transmission of large amounts of sensitive and
proprietary information over public communications networks, as well as the
processing and storage of confidential customer information. Unauthorized
access, computer viruses, accidents, employee error or malfeasance, fraudulent
service plan orders, intentional misconduct by computer “hackers”, and other
disruptions can occur that could compromise the security of our infrastructure,
thereby exposing such information to unauthorized access by third parties and
leading to interruptions, delays or cessation of service to our customers.
Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to sabotage systems, change
frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target. We
may be unable to implement security measures in a timely manner or, if and when
implemented, these measures could be circumvented as a result of accidental or
intentional actions by parties within or outside of our organization. Any
breaches that occur could expose us to increased risk of lawsuits, loss of
existing or potential customers, harm to our reputation and increases in our
security costs. Although we typically require our customers to sign agreements
that contain provisions attempting to limit our liability for security breaches,
we cannot assure you that a court would enforce any contractual limitations on
our liability in the event that one of our customers brings a lawsuit against us
as the result of a security breach that they may ascribe to us. The outcome of
any such lawsuit would depend on the specific facts of the case and legal and
policy considerations that we may not be able to mitigate. In such cases, we
could be liable for substantial damage awards that may significantly exceed our
liability insurance coverage by unknown but significant amounts, which could
seriously impair our financial condition.
Our
operating results may be further adversely impacted by the current recession,
worldwide political and economic uncertainties and specific conditions in the
markets we address. As a result, the market price of our common stock could
decline.
Recently,
general worldwide economic conditions have experienced a deterioration due to
among other things, credit conditions resulting from the financial crisis
affecting the banking system and financial markets including: slower economic
activity, concerns about inflation and deflation, volatility in energy costs,
decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending,
the ongoing effects of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, recent international
conflicts, terrorist and military activity, and the impact of natural disasters
and public health emergencies. These conditions make it extremely difficult for
both us and our customers to accurately forecast and plan future business
activities. Additionally, they could cause U.S. and foreign
businesses to slow spending on our services, which could delay and lengthen our
new customer sales cycle and cause existing customers to do one or more of the
following:
|
■
|
Cancel
or reduce planned expenditures for our
services;
|
|
■
|
Seek
to lower their costs by renegotiating their contracts with
us;
|
|
■
|
Move
their hosting services in-house; or
|
|
■
|
Switch
to lower-priced solutions provided by us or our
competitors.
|
Customer
collections are our primary source of cash. We have historically grown through a
combination of an increase in new customers and revenue growth from our existing
customers. We have experienced a decrease in our installed base growth and if
the economic recession continues or deteriorates further, we may experience
additional reductions in our installed base growth, increases in churn and/or
longer new customer sales cycles. If these events were to occur, we could
experience a decrease in revenue and a reduction in operating margins. Further,
during challenging economic times, our customers may have difficulty gaining
timely access to sufficient credit, which could result in an impairment of their
ability to make timely payments to us. We have experienced an increase in our
allowance for doubtful accounts already, and if our customers’ ability to pay is
further eroded, we may be required to increase our allowance for doubtful
accounts. We cannot predict the timing, strength or duration of any economic
slowdown or subsequent economic recovery. If the economy or markets in which we
operate do not improve, we may record additional charges related to the
impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets, and our business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
Finally,
like many other companies, our stock price decreased during the onset of the
economic downturn. Although our stock price has recently increased,
if investors have concerns that our business, financial condition and results of
operations will be negatively impacted by a continued or worsened worldwide
economic downturn, our stock price could decrease again.
If
we overestimate or underestimate our data center capacity requirements, our
operating margins and profitability could be adversely affected.
The costs
of construction, leasing, and maintenance of our data centers constitute a
significant portion of our capital and operating expenses. In order to manage
growth and ensure adequate capacity for new and existing customers while
minimizing unnecessary excess capacity costs, we continuously evaluate our short
and long-term data center capacity requirements. Due to the lead time in
expanding existing data centers or building new data centers, we are required to
estimate demand for our services as far as two years into the future. We
currently plan to increase our infrastructure as required through the addition
of data centers in the U.S. and internationally. In contrast to our data centers
that we have established to date, several of which were acquired relatively
inexpensively as distressed assets of third parties, our current expansion plans
may require us to pay full market rates for new data center facilities. If we
overestimate the demand for our services and therefore overbuild our data center
capacity or commit to long term facility leases, our operating margins could be
materially reduced, which would materially impair our
profitability.
If we
underestimate our data center capacity requirements, we may not be able to
service the expanding needs of our existing customers. Additionally, we may be
required to limit new customer acquisition while we work to increase data center
capacity to satisfy demand, either of which may materially impair our revenue
growth.
- 38
-
We
rely on a number of third-party providers for data center space, equipment and
maintenance, and the loss of, or problems with, one or more of these providers
may impede our growth or cause us to lose customers.
We rely
on third-party providers to supply data center space, equipment and
maintenance. For example, we lease data center space from third party
landlords, lease or purchase equipment from equipment providers, and source
equipment maintenance through third parties. While we have entered into various
agreements for these products and services, any failure to obtain additional
capacity or space, equipment, or maintenance, if required, would impede the
growth of our business and cause our financial results to suffer. For example,
if a data center landlord does not adequately maintain its facilities, or
provide services for which it is responsible, we may not be able to deliver
services to our customers according to our standards or at
all. Further, the equipment that we purchase could be deficient in
some way, thereby affecting our products and services. If, for any reason, these
providers fail to provide the required services or suffer other failures, we may
incur financial losses and our customers may lose confidence in our company, and
we may not be able to retain these customers.
We
may not be able to renew the leases on our existing facilities on terms
acceptable to us, if at all, which could adversely affect our operating
results.
We do not
own the facilities occupied by our current data centers, but occupy them
pursuant to commercial leasing arrangements. The initial terms of our main
existing data center leases expire over a period ranging from 2009 to 2027, with
each having at least one renewal period of no less than three years, except our
older U.K. data center lease, which expires in November 2010. Data centers with
leases expiring in 2009 are in the U.K. and operations have been migrated to
another data center location in the U.K. Upon the expiration or termination of
our data center facility leases, we may not be able to renew these leases on
terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we fail to renew any data center lease and
are required to move the data center to a new facility, we would face
significant challenges due to the technical complexity, risk, and high costs of
relocating the equipment. For example, if we are required to migrate customer
servers to a new facility, such migration could result in significant downtime
for our affected customers. This could damage our reputation and lead us to lose
current and potential customers, which would harm our operating results and
financial condition.
Even if
we are able to renew the leases on our existing data centers, we expect that
rental rates, which will be determined based on then-prevailing market rates
with respect to the renewal option periods and which will be determined by
negotiation with the landlord after the renewal option periods, will be higher
than rates we currently pay under our existing lease agreements. If we fail to
increase revenue in our existing data centers by amounts sufficient to offset
any increases in rental rates for these facilities, our operating results may be
materially and adversely affected.
We
rely on third-party hardware that may be difficult to replace or could cause
errors or failures of our service, which could adversely affect our operating
results or harm our reputation.
We rely
on hardware acquired from third parties in order to offer our services. This
hardware may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms in
quantities sufficient to meet our business needs, which could adversely affect
our ability to generate revenue. Any errors or defects in third-party hardware
could result in errors or a failure of our service, which could harm our
reputation and operating results. Indemnification from hardware providers, if
any, would likely be insufficient to cover any damage to our business or our
customers resulting from such hardware failure.
We
rely on third-party software that may be difficult to replace or which could
cause errors or failures of our service that could lead to lost customers or
harm to our reputation.
We rely
on software licensed from third parties to offer our services. This software may
not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.
Any loss of the right to use any of this software could result in delays in the
provisioning of our services until equivalent technology is either developed by
us, or, if available, is identified, obtained, and integrated, which could harm
our business. Any errors or defects in third-party software or inadequate or
delayed support by the third party could result in errors or a failure of our
service which could harm our operating results by adversely affecting our
revenue or operating costs.
Increased
energy costs, power outages, and limited availability of electrical resources
may adversely affect our operating results.
Our data
centers are susceptible to increased regional, national or international costs
of power and to electrical power outages. Our customer contracts do not allow us
to pass on any increased costs of energy to our customers, which could affect
our operating margins. Further, power requirements at our data centers are
increasing as a result of the increasing power demands of today’s servers.
Increases in our power costs could impact our operating results and financial
condition. Since we rely on third parties to provide our data centers with power
sufficient to meet our needs, our data centers could have a limited or
inadequate amount of electrical resources necessary to meet our customer
requirements. We attempt to limit exposure to system downtime due to power
outages by using backup generators and power supplies. However, these
protections may not limit our exposure to power shortages or outages entirely.
Any system downtime resulting from insufficient power resources or power outages
could damage our reputation and lead us to lose current and potential customers,
which would harm our operating results and financial condition.
- 39
-
Increased
Internet bandwidth costs and network failures may adversely affect our operating
results.
Our
success depends in part upon the capacity, reliability, and performance of our
network infrastructure, including the capacity leased from our Internet
bandwidth suppliers. We depend on these companies to provide uninterrupted and
error-free service through their telecommunications networks. Some of these
providers are also our competitors. We exercise little control over these
providers, which increases our vulnerability to problems with the services they
provide. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience interruptions
or delays in network service. Any failure on our part or the part of our
third-party suppliers to achieve or maintain high data transmission capacity,
reliability or performance could significantly reduce customer demand for our
services and damage our business.
As our
customer base grows and their usage of telecommunications capacity increases, we
will be required to make additional investments in our capacity to maintain
adequate data transmission speeds, the availability of which may be limited or
the cost of which may be on terms unacceptable to us. If adequate capacity is
not available to us as our customers’ usage increases, our network may be unable
to achieve or maintain sufficiently high data transmission capacity, reliability
or performance. In addition, our business would suffer if our network suppliers
increased the prices for their services and we were unable to pass along the
increased costs to our customers.
Our
operating results may fluctuate significantly, which could make our future
results difficult to predict and could cause our operating results to fall below
investor or analyst expectations.
Our
operating results may fluctuate due to a variety of factors, including many of
the risks described in this section, which are outside of our control. As a
result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be
meaningful. You should not rely on our operating results for any prior periods
as an indication of our future operating performance. Fluctuations in our
revenue can lead to even greater fluctuations in our operating results. Our
budgeted expense levels depend in part on our expectations of long-term future
revenue. Given relatively fixed operating costs related to our personnel and
facilities, any substantial adjustment to our expenses to account for lower than
expected levels of revenue will be difficult and time consuming. Consequently,
if our revenue does not meet projected levels, our operating expenses would be
high relative to our revenue, which would negatively affect our operating
performance.
If our
revenue or operating results do not meet or exceed the expectations of investors
or securities analysts, the price of our common stock may decline.
We
could be required to repay substantial amounts of money to certain state and
local governments if we lose tax exemptions or grants previously awarded to us,
which could adversely affect our operating results.
In August
2007, we entered into an agreement with the State of Texas (Texas Enterprise
Fund Grant) under which we may receive up to $22.0 million in state enterprise
fund grants on the condition that we meet certain employment levels in the State
of Texas paying an average compensation of at least $56,000 per year (subject to
increases). To the extent we fail to meet these requirements, we may be required
to repay all or a portion of the grants plus interest. In September
2007, we received the initial installment of $5.0 million from the State of
Texas, which was recorded as a non-current liability.
On July
27, 2009, the Texas Enterprise Fund Grant agreement was amended to modify the
job creation requirements. Under the amendment, the grant has been
divided into four separate tranches. The first tranche, called “Basic Fund” in
the amendment, is $8.5 million with a Job Target of 1,225 new jobs by December
2012 (in addition to the 1,436 jobs in place as of August 1, 2007 for a total of
2,661 jobs in Texas). We already have drawn $5.0 million of this
grant. We can draw an additional $3.5 million when we reach 1,225 new jobs. If
we do not create 1,225 new jobs in Texas by 2012, we will be required to repay
the grant at a rate of $1,263 per job missed per year (clawback). The maximum
clawback would be the amounts we draw plus 3.4% interest on such amounts per
year. The remaining three tranches are at our option. We can draw an
additional $13.5 million, based on the following amounts and milestones: $5.5
million if we create a total of 2,100 new jobs in Texas; another $5.25 million
if we create a total of 3,000 new jobs in Texas; and $2.75 million more if we
create a total of 4,000 new jobs in Texas. We are responsible for maintaining
the jobs through January 2022. If we eliminate jobs for which we have drawn
funds, the clawback is triggered.
In
October 2008, we received a grant in partnership with the State of Texas and
Alamo Community College District, which will provide us the
opportunity to be reimbursed for up to $4.7 million for certain training
expenses conducted through Alamo Community College over the next three years. In
order to fulfill our requirements, we must meet the employment requirements
defined in the original Texas Enterprise Fund Grant agreement, which is
unlikely. Although we have not received any reimbursements, we are in
the process of evaluating this grant and the need to renegotiate its
terms.
On August
3, 2007, we entered into a lease for approximately 67 acres of land and a
1.2 million square foot facility in Windcrest, Texas, which is in the San
Antonio, Texas area, to house our corporate headquarters and potentially a
future data center operation. In connection with this lease, we also entered
into a Master Economic Incentives Agreement (“MEIA”) with the Cities of
Windcrest and San Antonio, Texas, Bexar County, and certain other parties,
pursuant to which we agreed to locate existing and future employees at the new
facility location. The agreement requires that we meet certain employment levels
each year, with an ultimate job requirement of 4,500 jobs by December 31, 2012,
provided that if the job requirement in any grant agreement with the State of
Texas is lower, then the job requirement under the MEIA is automatically
adjusted downward.
Consequently,
because the Texas
Enterprise Fund Grant agreement has been amended to reduce the state job
requirement, we
believe the job requirement under the MEIA has been reduced to
1,774. In addition, the MEIA requires that the median
compensation of those employees be no less than $51,000 per year. In exchange
for meeting these employment obligations, the parties agreed to enter into the
lease structure, pursuant to which, as a lessee of the Windcrest Economic
Development Corporation, we will not be subject to most of the property taxes
associated with the property for a 14 year period. If we fail to meet these job
creation requirements, we could lose a portion or all of the tax benefit being
provided during the 14 year period by having to make payments in lieu of taxes
(PILOT) to the City of Windcrest. The amount of the PILOT payment would be
calculated based on the amount of taxes that would have been owed for that
period if the property were not exempt, and then such amount would be adjusted
pursuant to certain factors, such as the percentage of employment achieved
compared to the stated requirements.
- 40
-
We
have significant debt obligations that include restrictive covenants limiting
our flexibility to manage our business; failure to comply with these covenants
could trigger an acceleration of our outstanding indebtedness and adversely
affect our financial position and operating results.
As of
September 30, 2009, outstanding indebtedness under our credit facility totaled
$50.0 million, with an outstanding letter of credit of $0.7 million. Our
credit facility requires that we maintain specific financial ratios and comply
with covenants, including financial covenants, which contain numerous
restrictions on our ability to incur additional debt, pay dividends or make
other restricted payments, sell assets, enter into affiliate transactions and
take other actions. Our existing credit facility is, and any future
financing arrangements may be, secured by all of our assets. If we are unable to
meet the terms of the financial covenants or if we breach any of these
covenants, a default could result under one or more of these agreements, which
may require us to repay all amounts owed under our credit facility.
If we are
unable to generate sufficient cash to repay our debt obligations when they
become due and payable, either when they mature or in the event of a default, we
may not be able to obtain additional debt or equity financing on favorable
terms, if at all, which may negatively impact our ability to continue as a going
concern.
We also
have substantial equipment lease obligations, which totaled approximately $109.5
million as of September 30, 2009. The payment obligations under these equipment
leases are secured by a significant portion of the hardware used in our data
centers. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from our operations
or cash from other sources in order to meet the payment obligations under these
equipment leases, we may lose the right to possess and operate the equipment
used in our data centers, which would substantially impair our ability to
provide our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our
liquidity or results of operations.
We
may require additional capital and may not be able to secure additional
financing on favorable terms to meet our future capital needs, which could
adversely affect our financial position and result in stockholder
dilution.
In order
to fund future growth, we will be dependent on significant capital expenditures.
We may need to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings in the
future in order to meet our operating and capital needs. We may not be able to
secure additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, or at all, at the
time when we need such funding. If we are unable to raise additional funds, we
may not be able to pursue our growth strategy and our business could suffer. If
we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity or convertible
debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution in
their percentage ownership of our company, and any new equity securities we
issue could have rights, preferences, and privileges senior to those of holders
of our common stock. In addition, any debt financing that we may obtain in the
future could have restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising
activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more
difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business
opportunities, including potential acquisitions.
We
are exposed to commodity and market price risks that have the potential to
substantially influence our profitability and liquidity.
We are a
large consumer of power. During the first nine months of 2009, we expensed
approximately $13.2 million to utility companies to power our data centers. We
anticipate an increase in our consumption of power in the future as our sales
grow. Power costs vary by locality and are subject to substantial seasonal
fluctuations and changes in energy prices. Our largest exposure to energy prices
currently exists at our Grapevine, Texas facility in the Dallas-Fort Worth area,
where the energy market is deregulated. Power costs have historically tracked
the general costs of energy, and continued increases in electricity costs may
negatively impact our gross margins or operating expenses. We periodically
evaluate the advisability of entering into fixed price utilities
contracts. If we choose not to enter into a fixed price contract, we
expose our cost structure to this commodity price risk.
The
majority of our customers are invoiced, and substantially all of our expenses
are paid, by us or our subsidiaries in the functional currency of our company or
our subsidiaries, respectively. However, some of our customers are currently
invoiced in currencies other than the applicable functional currency, such as
the Euro. As a result, we may incur foreign currency losses based on changes in
exchange rates between the date of the invoice and the date of collection. In
addition, large changes in foreign exchange rates relative to our functional
currencies could increase the costs of our services to non-U.S. customers
relative to local competitors, thereby causing us to lose existing or potential
customers to these local competitors. Thus, our results of operations and cash
flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. Further, as we grow our international operations, our exposure to foreign
currency risk could become more significant. To date, we have not entered into
any foreign currency hedging contracts, although we may do so in the
future.
We
may be accused of infringing the proprietary rights of others, which could
subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation and require us to discontinue
services that infringe the rights of others.
There may
be intellectual property rights held by others, including issued or pending
patents, trademarks, and service marks that cover significant aspects of our
technologies, branding or business methods, including technologies and
intellectual property we have licensed from third parties. Companies in the
technology industry, and other patent and trademark holders seeking to profit
from royalties in connection with grants of licenses, own large numbers of
patents, copyrights, trademarks, service marks, and trade secrets and frequently
enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations
of intellectual property rights. These or other parties could claim that we have
misappropriated or misused intellectual property rights and any such
intellectual property claim against us, regardless of merit, could be time
consuming and expensive to settle or litigate and could divert the attention of
our technical and management personnel. An adverse determination also could
prevent us from offering our services to our customers and may require that we
procure or develop substitute services that do not infringe. For any
intellectual property rights claim against us or our customers, we may have to
pay damages, indemnify our customers against damages or stop using technology or
intellectual property found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We may
be unable to replace those technologies with technologies that have the same
features or functionality and that are of equal quality and performance
standards on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Licensing replacement
technologies and intellectual property may significantly increase our operating
expenses or may require us to restrict our business activities in one or more
respects. We may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing
technology and intellectual property, which could require significant effort,
time, and expense.
- 41
-
Our
use of open source software could impose limitations on our ability to provide
our services, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating
results.
We
utilize open source software, including Linux-based software, in providing a
substantial portion of our services. The terms of many open source licenses have
not been interpreted by U.S. courts, and there is a risk that such licenses
could be construed in a manner that could impose unanticipated conditions or
restrictions on our ability to offer our services. Additionally, the use and
distribution of open source software can lead to greater risks than the use of
third-party commercial software, as open source software does not come with
warranties or other contractual protections regarding infringement claims or the
quality of the code. From time to time parties have asserted claims against
companies that distribute or use open source software in their products and
services, asserting that open source software infringes their intellectual
property rights. We could be subject to suits by parties claiming infringement
of intellectual property rights with respect to what we believe to be open
source software. In such event, we could be required to seek licenses from third
parties in order to continue using such software or offering certain of our
services or to discontinue the use of such software or the sale of our affected
services in the event we could not obtain such licenses, any of which could
adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. In
addition, if we combine our proprietary software with open source software in a
certain manner, we could, under some of the open source licenses, be required to
release the source code of our proprietary software.
We
may not be successful in protecting and enforcing our intellectual property
rights, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating
results.
We rely
primarily on copyright, trademark, service mark, and trade secret laws, as well
as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish and
protect our proprietary rights, all of which provide only limited protection. We
rely on copyright laws to protect software and certain other elements of our
proprietary technologies, although to date we have not registered for copyright
protection. We cannot assure you that any future copyright, trademark or service
mark registrations will be issued for pending or future applications or that any
registered or unregistered copyrights, trademarks or service marks will be
enforceable or provide adequate protection of our proprietary rights. We
currently have one patent in the U.S. Our patent may be contested, circumvented,
found unenforceable or invalidated.
We
endeavor to enter into agreements with our employees and contractors and
agreements with parties with whom we do business to limit access to and
disclosure of our proprietary information. The steps we have taken, however, may
not prevent unauthorized use or the reverse engineering of our technology.
Moreover, others may independently develop technologies that are substantially
equivalent, superior to, or otherwise competitive to the technologies we employ
in our services or that infringe our intellectual property. We may be unable to
prevent competitors from acquiring trademarks or service marks and other
proprietary rights that are similar to, infringe upon, or diminish the value of
our trademarks and service marks and our other proprietary rights. Enforcement
of our intellectual property rights also depends on successful legal actions
against infringers and parties who misappropriate our proprietary information
and trade secrets, but these actions may not be successful, even when our rights
have been infringed.
In
addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary
rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. Despite the measures taken by
us, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our
technology and information without authorization. Policing unauthorized use of
our proprietary technologies and other intellectual property and our services is
difficult, and litigation could become necessary in the future to enforce our
intellectual property rights. Any litigation could be time consuming and
expensive to prosecute or resolve, result in substantial diversion of management
attention and resources, and harm our business, financial condition, and results
of operations.
We
may be liable for the material that content providers distribute over our
network and we may have to terminate customers that provide content that is
determined to be illegal, which could adversely affect our operating
results.
The law
relating to the liability of private network operators for information carried
on, stored on, or disseminated through their networks is still unsettled in many
jurisdictions. We have been and expect to continue to be subject to legal claims
relating to the content disseminated on our network, including claims under the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act, other similar legislation and common law. In
addition, there are other potential customer activities, such as online gambling
and pornography, where we, in our role as a hosting provider, may be held liable
as an aider or abettor of our customers. If we need to take costly measures to
reduce our exposure to these risks, terminate customer relationships and the
associated revenue or defend ourselves against such claims, our financial
results could be negatively affected.
Government
regulation of data networks is largely unsettled, and depending on its
evolution, may adversely affect our operating results.
We are
subject to varying degrees of regulation in each of the jurisdictions in which
we provide services. Local laws and regulations, and their interpretation and
enforcement, differ significantly among those jurisdictions. Future regulatory,
judicial, and legislative changes may have a material adverse effect on our
ability to deliver services within various jurisdictions. National regulatory
frameworks that are consistent with the policies and requirements of the World
Trade Organization have only recently been, or are still being, put in place in
many countries. Accordingly, many countries are still in the early stages of
providing for and adapting to a liberalized telecommunications market. As a
result, in these markets we may encounter more protracted and difficult
procedures to obtain any necessary licenses or negotiate interconnection
agreements, which could negatively impact our ability to expand in these markets
or increase our operating costs in these markets.
- 42
-
Our
ability to operate and expand our business is susceptible to risks associated
with international sales and operations.
We
anticipate that, for the foreseeable future, a significant portion of our
revenue will continue to be derived from sources outside of the U.S. A key
element of our growth strategy is to further expand our customer base
internationally and successfully operate data centers in foreign markets. We
have limited experience operating in foreign jurisdictions other than the U.K.
and expect to rapidly grow our international operations. Managing a global
organization is difficult, time consuming, and expensive. Our inexperience in
operating our business globally increases the risk that international expansion
efforts that we may undertake will not be successful. In addition, conducting
international operations subjects us to new risks that we have not generally
faced. These risks include:
|
■
■
|
Localization
of our services, including translation into foreign languages and
adaptation for local practices and regulatory requirements;
Lack
of familiarity with and unexpected changes in foreign regulatory
requirements;
|
|
■
|
Longer
accounts receivable payment cycles and difficulties in collecting accounts
receivable;
|
|
■
|
Difficulties
in managing and staffing international
operations;
|
|
■
|
Fluctuations
in currency exchange rates;
|
|
■
|
Potentially
adverse tax consequences, including the complexities of transfer pricing,
foreign value added tax systems, and restrictions on the repatriation of
earnings;
|
|
■
|
Dependence
on certain third parties, including channel partners with whom we do not
have extensive experience;
|
|
■
|
The
burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and legal
standards;
|
|
■
|
Increased
financial accounting and reporting burdens and
complexities;
|
|
■
|
Political,
social, and economic instability abroad, terrorist attacks and security
concerns in general; and
|
|
■
|
Reduced
or varied protection for intellectual property rights in some
countries.
|
Operating
in international markets also requires significant management attention and
financial resources. The investment and additional resources required to
establish operations and manage growth in other countries may not produce
desired levels of revenue or profitability.
Our
acquisitions may divert our management’s attention, result in dilution to our
stockholders and consume resources that are necessary to sustain our
business.
We have
made acquisitions and, if appropriate opportunities present themselves, we
may make additional acquisitions or investments or enter into joint ventures or
strategic alliances with other companies. Risks commonly encountered in such
transactions include:
|
■
|
The
difficulty of assimilating the operations and personnel of the combined
companies;
|
|
■
|
The
risk that we may not be able to integrate the acquired services or
technologies with our current services, products, and
technologies;
|
|
■
|
The
potential disruption of our ongoing
business;
|
|
■
|
The
diversion of management attention from our existing
business;
|
|
■
|
The
inability of management to maximize our financial and strategic position
through the successful integration of the acquired
businesses;
|
|
■
|
Difficulty
in maintaining controls, procedures, and
policies;
|
|
■
■
|
The
impairment of relationships with employees, suppliers, and customers as a
result of any integration;
The
loss of an acquired base of customers and accompanying revenue;
and
|
|
■
|
The
assumption of leased facilities, other long-term commitments or
liabilities that could have a material adverse impact on our profitability
and cash flow.
|
As a
result of these potential problems and risks, businesses that we may acquire or
invest in may not produce the revenue, earnings, or business synergies that we
anticipated. In addition, there can be no assurance that any potential
transaction will be successfully identified and completed or that, if completed,
the acquired business or investment will generate sufficient revenue to offset
the associated costs or other potential harmful effects on our
business.
- 43
-
Terrorist
activity throughout the world and military action to counter terrorism could
adversely impact our operating results.
Terrorist
attacks and other acts of violence, as well as governments’ responses to such
activities, may have an adverse effect on business, financial, and general
economic conditions internationally. Terrorist activities may disrupt our
ability to provide our services or may increase our costs due to the need to
provide enhanced security, which would have a material adverse effect on our
business and results of operations. These circumstances may also adversely
affect our ability to attract and retain customers, our ability to raise
capital, and the operation and maintenance of our facilities. We may not have
adequate property and liability insurance to cover catastrophic events or
attacks brought on by terrorist attacks and other acts of violence. In addition,
we depend heavily on the physical infrastructure, particularly as it relates to
power, that exists in the markets in which we operate. Any damage to such
infrastructure in these markets where we operate may materially and adversely
affect our operating results.
We
have and will continue to incur significant increased costs as a result of
operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote
substantial time to new compliance initiatives.
As a
public company, we have and will continue to incur significant legal,
accounting, and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In
addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules subsequently
implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the New York Stock
Exchange have imposed various requirements on public companies, including
requiring changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other
personnel have and will need to continue to devote a substantial amount of time
to these new compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations have
and are expected to continue to increase our legal and financial compliance
costs, making some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these
new rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to
obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to
accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantial costs to maintain
the same or similar coverage. These rules and regulations could also make it
more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our
board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers.
In order
to respond to additional regulations applicable to public companies, such as
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we have hired a number of finance
and accounting personnel. In the future, we may be required to hire additional
full-time accounting employees to fill these and other related finance and
accounting positions. Some of these positions require candidates with public
company experience, and we may be unable to locate and hire such individuals as
quickly as needed, if at all. In addition, new employees will require time and
training to learn our business and operating processes and procedures. If our
finance and accounting organization is unable for any reason to respond
adequately to the increased demands resulting from being a public company, the
quality and timeliness of our financial reporting may suffer and we could
experience internal control weaknesses. Any consequences resulting from
inaccuracies or delays in our reported financial statements could have an
adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock as well as an adverse
effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
We
are in the process of evaluating our system of internal controls and may not be
able to demonstrate that we can accurately report our financial results or
prevent fraud. As a result, our stockholders could lose confidence in our
financial reporting, which could harm our business and the trading price of our
common stock.
Ensuring
that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures
in place so that we can produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis
is a costly and time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, or GAAP. We are in the process of documenting, reviewing
and improving our internal controls and procedures for compliance with
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires an annual management
assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial
reporting and a report by our independent auditors assessing the effectiveness
of such internal controls.
Changes
to financial accounting standards or practices may affect our reported financial
results and cause us to change our business practices.
We
prepare our financial statements to conform to GAAP. These accounting principles
are subject to interpretation by the SEC and various other bodies. A change in
those policies can have a significant effect on our reported results and may
affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced.
Changes to those rules or the interpretation of our current practices may
adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our
business.
- 44
-
Risks
Related to the Ownership of Our Common Stock
The
trading price of our common stock may be volatile.
The
market price of our common stock has been highly volatile and could be subject
to wide fluctuations in response to, among other things, the risk factors
described in this periodic report, and other factors beyond our control, such as
stock market volatility and fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived
by investors to be comparable to us.
Further,
the stock markets have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have
affected and continue to affect our stock price and the market prices of equity
securities of many other companies. These fluctuations often have been unrelated
or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad
market and industry fluctuations, as well as general economic, political, and
market conditions, such as recessions, interest rate changes or international
currency fluctuations, may negatively affect the market price of our common
stock. We may experience additional volatility as a result of the
limited number of our shares available for trading in the market.
In the
past, many companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of
their stock have been subject to securities class action litigation. We may be
the target of this type of litigation in the future. Securities litigation
against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s
attention from other business concerns, which could seriously harm our
business.
Our
common stock has only been publicly traded since our initial public offering on
August 7, 2008 and the price of our common stock has fluctuated substantially
since then and may fluctuate substantially in the future.
Our
common stock has only been publicly traded since our initial public offering on
August 7, 2008. The trading price of our common stock has fluctuated
significantly since then. For example, between December 31, 2008 and September
30, 2009, the closing trading price of our common stock was very volatile,
ranging between $4.38 and $18.33 per share, including single-day increases of up
to 12.9% and declines up to 11.7%. Our trading price could fluctuate
substantially in the future due to the factors discussed in this Risk Factors
section and elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Contractual
lock-up restrictions on the sale of approximately 99 million shares held by
certain stockholders expired on February 3, 2009 and to the extent a stockholder
is not an affiliate, its shares are now eligible for sale without
restriction. Affiliate sales are subject to the volume, manner
of sale and other restrictions of Rule 144 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1933 which allow the holder to sell up to the greater of 1% of our outstanding
common stock or our average weekly trading volume during any three-month
period. Shares beneficially held by Graham Weston, Norwest Venture
Partners and its affiliates, and certain other parties will be subject to such
requirements to the extent they are deemed to be our “affiliates” as that term
is defined in Rule 144. Additionally, Weston, Norwest, and other
holders possess registration rights with respect to some of the shares of our
common stock that they hold. If they choose to exercise such rights, their sale
of the shares that are registered would not be subject to the Rule 144
limitations. If a significant amount of the shares that become eligible for
resale enter the public trading markets in a short period of time, the market
price of our common stock may decline.
Additionally,
certain of our larger stockholders are venture funds that may from time to time
distribute the shares of our stock held by them to their limited partners in
order to provide them with liquidity with respect to their investment in our
stock. The distributed shares may be eligible for immediate resale, in which
case all or a significant portion of these shares may be sold by these limited
partners in the public markets during a short period of time following their
receipt of these shares, which may cause the market price for our stock to
decline.
The
issuance of additional stock in connection with acquisitions, our stock option
plans, or otherwise will dilute all other stockholdings.
We have a
large number of shares of common stock authorized but unissued and not reserved
for issuance under our stock option plans or otherwise. We may issue all of
these shares without any action or approval by our stockholders. We intend to
continue to actively pursue strategic acquisitions. We may pay for such
acquisitions, partly or in full, through the issuance of additional equity. Any
issuance of shares in connection with our acquisitions, the exercise of stock
options or otherwise would dilute the percentage ownership held by our then
existing stockholders.
Your
ability to influence corporate matters may be limited because a small number of
stockholders beneficially own a substantial amount of our common
stock.
Our
directors and executive officers and their affiliates beneficially own a
significant portion of our outstanding common stock. As a result,
these stockholders will be able to exercise significant influence over all
matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and
approval of significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale
of our company or its assets. Although our directors and executive officers are
not currently party to any agreements or understandings to act together on
matters submitted for stockholder approval, this concentration of ownership
could limit your ability to influence corporate matters and may have the effect
of delaying or preventing a third party from acquiring control over
us.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law may discourage or
prevent a change of control, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to our
stockholders, which could affect our stock price adversely and prevent attempts
by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
Our
restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain
provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control of our company or
changes in our board of directors deemed undesirable by our board of directors
that our stockholders might consider favorable. Some of these
provisions:
■
|
Authorize
the issuance of blank check preferred stock which can be created and
issued by our board of directors without prior stockholder approval, with
voting, liquidation, dividend, and other rights senior to those of our
common stock;
|
■
|
Provide
for a classified board of directors, with each director serving a
staggered three-year term;
|
■
|
Prohibit
our stockholders from filling board vacancies or increasing the size of
our board, calling special stockholder meetings or taking action by
written consent;
|
■
|
Provide
for the removal of a director only with cause and by the affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at an
election of our directors; and
|
■
|
Require
advance written notice of stockholder proposals and director
nominations.
|
In
addition, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, which may prohibit certain business combinations with
stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. These and other
provisions in our restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated
bylaws and Delaware law could make it more difficult for stockholders or
potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate
actions that are opposed by our then current board of directors, including a
merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving our company. Any delay or
prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our board of
directors could cause the market price of our common stock to
decline.
- 45
-
ITEM
2 – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Sales
of Unregistered Securities
On August
31, 2009, we issued 477,964 shares of our common stock to the two owners of
Slicehost, LLC as partial consideration for reaching an earn-out target related
to our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Slicehost, LLC on
October 22, 2008. The issuances of these shares of common stock were made in
reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933.
ITEM
3 – DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM
4 – SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM
5 – OTHER INFORMATION
None
- 46
-
ITEM
6 – EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number Description
10.1
*
|
First
Amendment to Lease Agreement by and between Grizzly Ventures LLC and
Rackspace US, Inc. dated October 1,
2009
|
31.1
*
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)
and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
31.2
*
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)
and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
32.1
**
|
Certifications
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
32.2
**
|
Certifications
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
* | Filed herewith |
** | Furnished herewith |
- 47
-
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on November
12, 2009.
Rackspace Hosting,
Inc.
Date:
November 12, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/
Bruce R. Knooihuizen
|
|||||||||
Bruce
R. Knooihuizen
|
|||||||||||
Chief
Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and
Treasurer
|
|||||||||||
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
- 48
-