Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-3.S - EXHIBIT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LP | msccex3201.htm |
EX-1.S - EXHIBIT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LP | msccex3101.htm |
EX-2.S - EXHIBIT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LP | msccex3102.htm |
EX-4.S - EXHIBIT - MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL LP | msccex3202.htm |
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 or
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
transition period from __________________to__________________
Commission
File Number: 0-50064
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
|
||
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
01-0710311
|
|||
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|||
Demeter
Management LLC
|
||||
522
Fifth Avenue, 13th Floor
|
||||
New
York, NY
|
10036
|
|||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code
|
(212)
296-1999
|
Morgan
Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer x
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes 0 No
T
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
September 30,
2009
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Statements
of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
2
|
|
Statements
of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and
2008
|
3
|
|
Statements
of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2009 and 2008
|
4
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
5
|
|
Condensed
Schedules of Investments as of September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008
|
6
|
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
7-20
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
21-30
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
31-41
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
42
|
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
42
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
43
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
43
|
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
STATEMENTS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Unaudited)
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||
2009
|
2008
|
||
ASSETS
|
$
|
$
|
|
Trading
Equity:
|
|||
Unrestricted
cash
|
96,636,436
|
155,972,722
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
8,600,091
|
4,511,014
|
|
Total
cash
|
105,236,527
|
160,483,736
|
|
Net
unrealized gain (loss) on open contracts (MS&Co.)
|
1,921,418
|
(1,388,389)
|
|
Net
unrealized loss on open contracts (MSIP)
|
(77,776)
|
(105,063)
|
|
Total
net unrealized gain (loss) on open contracts
|
1,843,642
|
(1,493,452)
|
|
Options
purchased (premiums paid $130,930 and $60,871,
respectively)
|
91,792
|
33,971
|
|
Total
Trading Equity
|
107,171,961
|
159,024,255
|
|
Interest
receivable (MS&Co.)
|
3,883
|
–
|
|
Total
Assets
|
107,175,844
|
159,024,255
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
|
|||
Liabilities
|
|||
Redemptions
payable
|
1,569,766
|
11,187,909
|
|
Accrued
brokerage fees (MS&Co.)
|
512,242
|
784,414
|
|
Accrued
management fees
|
226,240
|
346,450
|
|
Options
written (premiums received $82,275 and $219,773,
respectively)
|
73,925
|
194,835
|
|
Interest
payable (MS&Co.)
|
–
|
12,183
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
2,382,173
|
12,525,791
|
|
Partners’
Capital
|
|||
Limited
Partners (10,333,303.850 and 13,330,566.139 Units,
respectively)
|
103,724,416
|
145,023,184
|
|
General
Partner (106,522.055 and 135,608.055 Units, respectively)
|
1,069,255
|
1,475,280
|
|
Total
Partners’ Capital
|
104,793,671
|
146,498,464
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital
|
107,175,844
|
159,024,255
|
|
NET
ASSET VALUE PER UNIT
|
10.04
|
10.88
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
- 2
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
For
the Three Months
Ended September 30,
|
For
the Nine Months
Ended September 30,
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
||||
INVESTMENT
INCOME
|
|||||||
Interest
income (MS&Co.)
|
23,511
|
795,180
|
92,365
|
3,229,723
|
|||
EXPENSES
|
|||||||
Brokerage
fees (MS&Co.)
|
1,573,191
|
3,060,407
|
5,423,806
|
10,274,111
|
|||
Management
fees
|
694,826
|
1,351,680
|
2,395,514
|
4,537,732
|
|||
Total
Expenses
|
2,268,017
|
4,412,087
|
7,819,320
|
14,811,843
|
|||
NET
INVESTMENT LOSS
|
(2,244,506)
|
(3,616,907)
|
(7,726,955)
|
(11,582,120)
|
|||
TRADING
RESULTS
|
|||||||
Trading
profit (loss):
|
|||||||
Realized
|
514,502
|
8,099,386
|
(5,580,913)
|
15,011,020
|
|||
Net
change in unrealized
|
4,130,247
|
(14,322,798)
|
3,308,268
|
(2,788,670)
|
|||
Total
Trading Results
|
4,644,749
|
(6,223,412)
|
(2,272,645)
|
12,222,350
|
|||
NET
INCOME (LOSS)
|
2,400,243
|
(9,840,319)
|
(9,999,600)
|
640,230
|
|||
NET
INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATION
|
|||||||
Limited
Partners
|
2,376,331
|
(9,732,603)
|
(9,898,260)
|
639,412
|
|||
General
Partner
|
23,912
|
(107,716)
|
(101,340)
|
818
|
|||
NET
INCOME (LOSS) PER UNIT
|
|||||||
Limited
Partners
|
0.23
|
(0.55)
|
(0.87)
|
0.01
|
|||
General
Partner
|
0.23
|
(0.55)
|
(0.87)
|
0.01
|
|||
Units
|
Units
|
Units
|
Units
|
||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER
|
|||||||
OF
UNITS OUTSTANDING
|
10,664,854.740
|
17,453,401.888
|
11,520,339.552
|
19,984,618.812
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
– 3
–
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
For the
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(Unaudited)
Units
of
|
|||||||
Partnership
|
Limited
|
General
|
|||||
Interest
|
Partners
|
Partner
|
Total
|
||||
$
|
$
|
$
|
|||||
Partners’
Capital,
|
|||||||
December
31, 2007
|
24,174,180.736
|
266,111,229
|
2,994,652
|
269,105,881
|
|||
Net
Income
|
–
|
639,412
|
818
|
640,230
|
|||
Redemptions
|
(7,463,850.372)
|
(82,643,328)
|
(1,002,926)
|
(83,646,254)
|
|||
Partners’
Capital,
|
|||||||
September
30, 2008
|
16,710,330.364
|
184,107,313
|
1,992,544
|
186,099,857
|
|||
Partners’
Capital,
|
|||||||
December
31, 2008
|
13,466,174.194
|
145,023,184
|
1,475,280
|
146,498,464
|
|||
Net
Loss
|
–
|
(9,898,260)
|
(101,340)
|
(9,999,600)
|
|||
Redemptions
|
(3,026,348.289)
|
(31,400,508)
|
(304,685)
|
(31,705,193)
|
|||
Partners’
Capital,
|
|||||||
September
30, 2009
|
10,439,825.905
|
103,724,416
|
1,069,255
|
104,793,671
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
- 4
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For the Nine Months Ended September
30,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
||
$
|
$
|
||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|||
Net
income (loss)
|
(9,999,600)
|
640,230
|
|
Noncash
item included in net income (loss):
|
|||
Net
change in unrealized
|
(3,308,268)
|
2,788,670
|
|
(Increase)
decrease in operating assets:
|
|||
Restricted
cash
|
(4,089,077)
|
9,755,900
|
|
Net
premiums paid for options purchased
|
(70,059)
|
524,567
|
|
Interest
receivable (MS&Co.)
|
(3,883)
|
680,470
|
|
Decrease
in operating liabilities:
|
|||
Accrued
brokerage fees (MS&Co.)
|
(272,172)
|
(454,719)
|
|
Accrued
management fees
|
(120,210)
|
(200,834)
|
|
Net
premiums received from options written
|
(137,498)
|
(291,464)
|
|
Interest
payable
|
(12,183)
|
–
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used for) operating activities
|
(18,012,950)
|
13,442,820
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|||
Cash
paid for redemptions of Units
|
(41,323,336)
|
(88,832,113)
|
|
Net
cash used for financing activities
|
(41,323,336)
|
(88,832,113)
|
|
Net
decrease in unrestricted cash
|
(59,336,286)
|
(75,389,293)
|
|
Unrestricted
cash at beginning of period
|
155,972,722
|
261,151,086
|
|
Unrestricted
cash at end of period
|
96,636,436
|
185,761,793
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
- 5
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
CONDENSED
SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (Unaudited)
Futures and Forward
Contracts
|
Long
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
|
Percentage
of
Net Assets
|
Short Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
|
Percentage
of
Net Assets
|
Net
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
|
$
|
%
|
$
|
%
|
$
|
|
September
30, 2009, Partnership Net Assets: $104,793,671
|
|||||
Commodity
|
(23,896)
|
(0.02)
|
(239,646)
|
(0.23)
|
(263,542)
|
Equity
|
62,261
|
0.06
|
–
|
–
|
62,261
|
Foreign
currency
|
3,873,856
|
3.70
|
(27,012)
|
(0.03)
|
3,846,844
|
Interest
rate
|
367,184
|
0.35
|
114,543
|
0.11
|
481,727
|
Grand
Total:
|
4,279,405
|
4.09
|
(152,115)
|
(0.15)
|
4,127,290
|
Unrealized
Currency Loss
|
(2.18)
|
(2,283,648)
|
|||
Total
Net Unrealized Gain on Open Contracts
|
1,843,642
|
||||
Option Contracts
|
Fair Value
|
Percentage
of
Net Assets
|
|||
$
|
%
|
||||
Options
purchased on Futures Contracts
|
–
|
–
|
|||
Options
purchased on Forward Contracts
|
91,792
|
0.09
|
|||
Options
written on Futures Contracts
|
–
|
–
|
|||
Options
written on Forward Contracts
|
(73,925)
|
(0.07)
|
|||
Futures and Forward
Contracts
|
Long Unrealized
Gain
|
Percentage
of
Net Assets
|
Short Unrealized
Loss
|
Percentage
of
Net Assets
|
Net
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
|
$
|
%
|
$
|
%
|
$
|
|
December
31, 2008, Partnership Net Assets: $146,498,464
|
|||||
Commodity
|
8,130
|
0.01
|
(157,027)
|
(0.11)
|
(148,897)
|
Equity
|
56,182
|
0.04
|
(188,676)
|
(0.13)
|
(132,494)
|
Foreign
currency
|
1,629,758
|
1.11
|
(868,681)
|
(0.59)
|
761,077
|
Interest
rate
|
511,819
|
0.35
|
(131,372)
|
(0.09)
|
380,447
|
Grand
Total:
|
2,205,889
|
1.51
|
(1,345,756)
|
(0.92)
|
860,133
|
Unrealized
Currency Loss
|
(1.61)
|
(2,353,585)
|
|||
Total
Net Unrealized Loss on Open Contracts
|
(1,493,452)
|
||||
Option Contracts
|
Fair Value
|
Percentage
of
Net Assets
|
|||
$
|
%
|
||||
Options
purchased on Futures Contracts
|
–
|
–
|
|||
Options
purchased on Forward Contracts
|
33,971
|
0.02
|
|||
Options
written on Futures Contracts
|
–
|
–
|
|||
Options
written on Forward Contracts
|
(194,835)
|
(0.13)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
- 6
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
September
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
The
unaudited financial statements contained herein include, in the opinion of
management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
condition and results of operations of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter
Campbell L.P. (formerly, Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.) (the
“Partnership”). The financial statements and condensed notes herein
should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008.
1. Organization
Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney Charter Campbell L.P. (formerly, Morgan Stanley Charter
Campbell L.P.) is a Delaware limited partnership organized in 2002 to engage
primarily in the speculative trading of futures contracts, options on futures
and forward contracts, and forward contracts on physical commodities and other
commodity interests, including, but not limited to, foreign currencies,
financial instruments, metals, energy, and agricultural products (collectively,
“Futures Interests”) (refer to Note 4. Financial
Instruments). The Partnership is one of the Morgan Stanley
Smith Barney Charter series of funds, comprised of the Partnership, Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney Charter Graham L.P., Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter
WNT L.P., and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Aspect L.P. (collectively, the
"Charter Series").
Effective
September 29, 2009, Demeter Management LLC (“Demeter”), the general partner of
the Partnership, changed the name of Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P. to
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Charter Campbell L.P.
- 7
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The
Partnership may buy or write put and call options through listed exchanges and
the over-the-counter market. The buyer of an option has the right to
purchase (in the case of a call option) or sell (in the case of a put option) a
specified quantity of a specific Futures Interest or underlying asset at a
specified price prior to or on a specified expiration date. The
writer of an option is exposed to the risk of loss if the market price of the
Futures Interest on the underlying asset declines (in the case of a put option)
or increases (in the case of a call option). The writer of an option
can never profit by more than the premium paid by the buyer but can lose an
unlimited amount.
Premiums
received/premiums paid from writing/purchasing options are recorded as
liabilities/assets on the Statements of Financial Condition and are subsequently
adjusted to fair values. The difference between the fair value of the
option and the premiums received/premiums paid is treated as an unrealized gain
or loss.
The
Partnership’s general partner is Demeter. The commodity brokers
are Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (“MS&Co.”) and Morgan Stanley
& Co. International plc (“MSIP”). MS&Co. acts as the
counterparty on all trading of foreign currency forward
contracts. Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. (“MSCG”) acts as the
counterparty on all trading of options on foreign currency forward
contracts. MSIP serves as the commodity
broker for trades on the London Metal Exchange (“LME”). Demeter is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holding LLC
(“MSSB”). MSSB is majority-owned indirectly by Morgan Stanley and
minority-owned indirectly by Citigroup Inc. MS&Co., MSCG, and
MSIP are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Morgan Stanley. Campbell & Company,
Inc. (the “Trading Advisor”) is the trading advisor to the
Partnership.
- 8
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
On July
1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(“GAAP”), also known as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
105-10, Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (“ASC 105-10” or the
“Codification”). ASC 105-10 established the exclusive authoritative
reference for U.S. GAAP for use in financial statements except for Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and interpretive releases, which are also
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes
all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. The
Codification became the single source of authoritative accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States and is effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009.
2. Related Party
Transactions
The
Partnership’s cash is on deposit with MS&Co. and MSIP in futures, forward
and options trading accounts to meet margin requirements as
needed. Monthly, MS&Co. credits the Partnership with interest
income on 100% of its average daily funds held at MS&Co. and MSIP to meet
margin requirements at a rate approximately equivalent to what the commodity
brokers pay other similar customers on margin deposits. In addition,
MS&Co. credits the Partnership at each month end with interest income on
100% of the Partnership’s assets not deposited as margin at a rate equal to the
monthly average on the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate during such
month. The Partnership pays brokerage fees to
MS&Co. MSCG acts as the counterparty on all trading options on
foreign currency forward contracts.
- 9
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly, Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. Income
Taxes
No
provision for income taxes has been made in the accompanying financial
statements, as partners are individually responsible for reporting income or
loss based upon their respective share of the Partnership’s revenues or expenses
for income tax purposes. The Partnership files U.S. federal and state tax
returns.
ASC
740-10, Income Taxes
(which incorporates former FASB No. 109 and FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Income Taxes),
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a
Partnership's financial statements, and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken. The 2005
through 2008 tax years generally remain subject to examination by U.S. federal
and most state tax authorities.
4. Financial
Instruments
The
Partnership trades Futures Interests. Futures and forwards represent
contracts for delayed delivery of an instrument at a specified date and
price. Futures Interests are open commitments until settlement date,
at which time they are realized. They are valued at fair value,
generally on a daily basis, and the unrealized gains and losses on open
contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are
reported in the Statements of Financial Condition as net unrealized gains or
losses on open contracts. The resulting net change in unrealized
gains and losses is reflected in the change in unrealized trading profit (loss)
on open contracts from one period to the next on the Statements of
Operations. The fair value of exchange-traded futures, options and
forwards contracts
- 10
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
is
determined by the various futures exchanges, and reflects the settlement price
for each contract as of the close of business on the last business day of the
reporting period. The fair value of foreign currency forward
contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of
approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) of the last business day of the reporting
period. The fair value of non-exchange-traded foreign currency option
contracts is calculated by applying an industry standard model application for
options valuation of foreign currency options, using as input, the spot prices,
interest rates, and option implied volatilities quoted as of approximately 3:00
P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period. Risk
arises from changes in the value of these contracts and the potential inability
of counterparties to perform under the terms of the contracts. There
are numerous factors which may significantly influence the fair value of these
contracts, including interest rate volatility.
The fair
value of exchange-traded contracts is based on the settlement price quoted by
the exchange on the day with respect to which fair value is being
determined. If an exchange-traded contract could not have been
liquidated on such day due to the operation of daily limits or other rules of
the exchange, the settlement price shall be the settlement price on the first
subsequent day on which the contract could be liquidated. The fair
value of off-exchange-traded contracts is based on the fair value quoted by the
counterparty.
The
Partnership’s contracts are accounted for on a trade-date basis and marked to
market on a daily basis. The Partnership accounts for its derivative
investments as required by ASC 815-10-15, Derivative and Hedging
(formerly, SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities). A derivative is defined
as a financial instrument or other contract that has all three of the following
characteristics:
- 11
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
1)
|
One
or more underlying notional amounts or payment
provisions;
|
2)
|
Requires
no initial net investment or a smaller initial net investment than would
be required relative to changes in market
factors;
|
3)
|
Terms
require or permit net settlement.
|
Generally,
derivatives include futures, forward, swap or options contracts, and other
financial instruments with similar characteristics such as caps, floors, and
collars.
The net
unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts, reported as a component of "Trading
Equity" on the Statements of Financial Condition, and their longest contract
maturities were as follows:
Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Open
Contracts
|
Longest Maturities
|
||||
Date
|
Exchange-Traded
|
Off-Exchange-Traded
|
Total
|
Exchange-Traded
|
Off-Exchange-Traded
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
|||
Sep.
30, 2009
|
(2,003,127)
|
3,846,769
|
1,843,642
|
Dec.
2010
|
Dec.
2009
|
Dec.
31, 2008
|
(2,252,566)
|
759,114
|
(1,493,452)
|
Sep.
2009
|
Mar.
2009
|
The
Partnership has credit risk associated with counterparty
non-performance. As of the date of the financial statements, the
credit risk associated with the instruments in which the Partnership trades is
limited to the unrealized gain amounts reflected in the Partnership’s Statements
of Financial Condition.
- 12
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The
Partnership also has credit risk because MS&Co., MSIP, and/or MSCG act as
the futures commission merchants or the counterparties, with respect to most of
the Partnership’s assets. Exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward, and
exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts are marked to market on a daily
basis, with variations in value settled on a daily basis. MS&Co. and MSIP,
each acting as a commodity broker for the Partnership’s exchange-traded futures,
exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts,
are required, pursuant to regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (“CFTC”), to segregate from their own assets, and for the sole
benefit of their commodity customers, all funds held by them with respect
to exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded
futures-styled options contracts, including an amount equal to the net
unrealized gains (losses) on all open exchange-traded futures, exchange-traded
forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts, which funds, in
the aggregate, totaled $103,233,400 and $158,231,170 at September 30,
2009, and December 31, 2008, respectively. With respect to the
Partnership’s off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts and forward
currency options contracts, there are no daily settlements of variation in
value, nor is there any requirement that an amount equal to the net unrealized
gains (losses) on such contracts be segregated. However, the
Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized
loss on open forward currency contracts in the Partnership accounts with the
counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in
a custody account held at MS&Co. With respect to those off-exchange-traded
forward currency contracts, the Partnership is at risk to the ability of
MS&Co., the sole counterparty on all such contracts, to perform. With
respect to those off-exchange-traded forward currency options contracts, the
Partnership is at risk to the ability of MSCG, the sole counterparty on all such
contracts, to
- 13
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
perform. The
Partnership has a netting agreement with each counterparty. These
agreements, which seek to reduce
both the
Partnership’s and the counterparties’ exposure on off-exchange-traded forward
currency contracts, including options on such contracts, should materially
decrease the Partnership’s credit risk in the event of MS&Co.’s or MSCG’s
bankruptcy or insolvency.
The
futures, forwards and options on such contracts traded by the Partnership
involve varying degrees of related market risk. Market risk is often
dependent upon changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, exchange
rates, and prices of financial instruments and commodities, factors that result
in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s open positions, and
consequently in its earnings, whether realized or unrealized, and cash
flow. Gains and losses on open positions of exchange-traded futures,
exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts
are settled daily through variation margin. Gains and losses on
off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts and forward currency options
contracts are settled upon termination of the contract.
However,
the Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net
unrealized loss on open forward currency contracts in the Partnership accounts
with the counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash
balance in a custody account held at MS&Co.
5. Derivative and
Hedging
ASC
815-10-65, Derivative and
Hedging (formerly, SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of SFAS No.
133), issued in March 2008, is intended to improve financial reporting
about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced
disclosures to enable investors
- 14
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
to better
understand how those instruments and activities are accounted for; how and why
they are used; and their effects on a Partnership’s financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. ASC 815-10-65 is effective as
of January 1, 2009, for the Partnership.
The
Partnership’s objective is to profit from speculative trading in Futures
Interests. Therefore, the Trading Advisor for the Partnership will
take speculative positions in Futures Interests where it feels the best profit
opportunities exist for its trading strategy. As such, the absolute
quantity (the total of the open long and open short positions) has been
presented as a part of the volume disclosure, as position direction is not an
indicative factor in such volume disclosures. In regards to foreign currency
forward trades, each notional quantity amount has been converted to an
equivalent contract based upon an industry convention.
The
following table summarizes the valuation of the Partnership’s investments as
required by ASC 815-10-65 as of September 30, 2009 and reflects the contracts
outstanding at such time.
The
Effect of Trading Activities on the Statements of Financial Condition as of
September 30, 2009:
Futures and Forward
Contracts
|
Long
Unrealized
Gain
|
Long
Unrealized
Loss
|
Short
Unrealized
Gain
|
Short
Unrealized
Loss
|
Net Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
|
Total
number of outstanding
contracts
(absolute quantity)
|
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
|||
Commodity
|
83,172
|
(107,068)
|
42,850
|
(282,496)
|
(263,542)
|
301
|
|
Equity
|
204,373
|
(142,112)
|
–
|
–
|
62,261
|
822
|
|
Foreign
currency
|
3,933,200
|
(59,344)
|
92,670
|
(119,682)
|
3,846,844
|
3,990
|
|
Interest
rate
|
393,908
|
(26,724)
|
114,543
|
–
|
481,727
|
2,142
|
|
Total
|
4,614,653
|
(335,248)
|
250,063
|
(402,178)
|
4,127,290
|
||
Unrealized
currency loss
|
(2,283,648)
|
||||||
Total
net unrealized gain on open contracts
|
1,843,642
|
Option
Contracts at Fair Value
|
|||||||
Options
purchased
|
$91,792
|
||||||
Options
written
|
$(73,925)
|
- 15
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The
following tables summarize the net trading results of the Partnership during the
three and nine month periods as required by the disclosures about Derivative and
Hedging Topics of ASC 815-10-65.
The
Effect of Trading Activities on the Statements of Operations for the Three and
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009, included in Total Trading
Results:
For
the Three Months
|
For
the Nine Months
|
|
Ended September 30,
2009
|
Ended September 30,
2009
|
|
Type of Instrument
|
$
|
$
|
Commodity
|
(219,554)
|
(1,021,164)
|
Equity
|
2,200,441
|
(1,329,034)
|
Foreign
currency
|
3,428,772
|
2,527,648
|
Interest
rate
|
(800,486)
|
(2,520,032)
|
Unrealized
currency gain
|
35,576
|
69,937
|
Total
|
4,644,749
|
(2,272,645)
|
Line
Items on the Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2009:
For
the Three Months
|
For
the Nine Months
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
Trading Results
|
$
|
$
|
Realized
|
514,502
|
(5,580,913)
|
Net
change in unrealized
|
4,130,247
|
3,308,268
|
Total
Trading Results
|
4,644,749
|
(2,272,645)
|
6. Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures
As
defined by ASC 820-10-55, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (formerly, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements),
fair value is the amount that would be recovered when an asset is sold or an
amount paid to transfer a liability, in an ordinary transaction, between market
participants at the measurement date (exit price). Market price
observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the types of
investments, the characteristics specific to the investment, and the state of
the market (including the existence and the
- 16
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
transparency
of transactions between market participants). Investments with
readily available actively quoted prices in an ordinary market will generally
have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of
judgment used in measuring fair value.
ASC
820-10-55 requires use of a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 -
unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities; Level 2 - inputs other than unadjusted quoted market prices that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly
(including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, credit risk);
and Level 3 - unobservable inputs for the asset or liability (including the
Partnership’s own assumptions used in determining the fair value of
investments).
In
certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different
levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s
level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement. The Partnership’s
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to
the investment.
The
following tables summarize the valuation of the Partnership’s investments by the
above ASC 820-10-55 fair value hierarchy as of September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008:
- 17
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
September 30,
2009
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||
$
|
$
|
$
|
|||
Assets
|
|||||
Net
unrealized gain (loss) on open
contracts
|
(2,003,127)
|
3,846,769
|
n/a
|
1,843,642
|
|
Options
purchased
|
–
|
91,792
|
n/a
|
91,792
|
|
Liabilities
|
|||||
Options
written
|
–
|
73,925
|
n/a
|
73,925
|
December 31,
2008
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total
|
||
$
|
$
|
$
|
|||
Assets
|
|||||
Net
unrealized gain (loss) on open
contracts
|
(2,252,566)
|
759,114
|
n/a
|
(1,493,452)
|
|
Options
purchased
|
–
|
33,971
|
n/a
|
33,971
|
|
Liabilities
|
|||||
Options
written
|
–
|
194,835
|
n/a
|
194,835
|
7. Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
(a) Fair Value
Measurements
ASC
820-10-65, Fair Value
Measurements (formerly, FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) SFAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly), was issued
in April 2008. ASC 820-10-65 provides additional guidance for
determining fair value and requires new disclosures regarding the categories
of
- 18
-
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
fair
value instruments, as well as the inputs and valuation techniques utilized to
determine fair value and any changes to the inputs and valuation techniques
during the period. ASC 820-10-65 is effective for the interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC
820-10-65 did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial
statements.
(b) Financial
Instruments
ASC
825-10-65, Financial
Instruments (formerly, FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and Accounting Principals Board
No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures
About Fair Value of Financial Instruments), was issued in April
2009. ASC
825-10-65 requires
fair value disclosures of financial instruments on a quarterly basis, as well as
new disclosures regarding the methodology and significant assumptions underlying
the fair value measures and any changes to the methodology and assumptions
during the reporting period. ASC 825-10-65 is effective for the
interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption
of ASC 825-10-65 did not have a material impact on the Partnership’s financial
statements.
(c) Subsequent
Events
The
Partnership adopted ASC 855-10, Subsequent Events (formerly,
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent
Events), which was issued in May 2009. ASC 855-10 establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are
available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date
through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for
that
– 19
–
MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY CHARTER CAMPBELL L.P.
(formerly,
Morgan Stanley Charter Campbell L.P.)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (CONCLUDED)
date,
that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were
issued or were available to be issued. ASC 855-10 is effective for
the interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. Management
has performed its evaluation of subsequent events through November 12, 2009, the
date these financial statements were issued, and has determined that there were
no subsequent events requiring adjustment or disclosure in the financial
statements.
8. Restricted and Unrestricted
Cash
As
reflected on the Partnership’s Statements of Financial Condition, restricted
cash equals the cash portion of assets on deposit to meet margin requirements
plus the cash required to offset unrealized losses on foreign currency forwards
and options and offset losses on offset LME positions. All of these amounts are
maintained separately. Cash that is not classified as restricted cash
is therefore classified as unrestricted cash.
– 20
–
Item
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF
OPERATIONS
Liquidity. The
Partnership deposits its assets with MS&Co. and MSIP as commodity brokers in
separate futures, forward and options trading accounts established for the
Trading Advisor. Such assets are used as margin to engage in trading
and may be used as margin solely for the Partnership’s trading. The assets are
held in either non-interest bearing bank accounts or in securities and
instruments permitted by the CFTC for investment of customer segregated or
secured funds. Since the Partnership’s sole purpose is to trade in
futures, forwards and options, it is expected that the Partnership will continue
to own such liquid assets for margin purposes.
The
Partnership’s investment in futures, forwards and options may, from time to
time, be illiquid. Most U.S. futures exchanges limit fluctuations in
prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price
fluctuations limits” or “daily limits”. Trades may not be
executed at prices beyond the daily limit. If the price for a
particular futures or options contract has increased or decreased by an amount
equal to the daily limit, positions in that futures or options contract can
neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at
or within the limit. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for
several consecutive days with little or no trading. These market
conditions could prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating its futures
or options contracts and result in restrictions on redemptions.
There is
no limitation on daily price movements in trading forward contracts on foreign
currencies. The markets for some world currencies have low trading
volume and are illiquid, which may prevent the Partnership from trading in
potentially profitable markets or prevent the Partnership from promptly
liquidating unfavorable positions in such markets, subjecting it to substantial
losses. Either of these market conditions could result in
restrictions on redemptions. For the periods covered by this report,
illiquidity has not materially affected the Partnership’s assets.
- 21
-
There are
no known material trends, demands, commitments, events, or uncertainties at the
present time that are reasonably likely to result in the Partnership’s liquidity
increasing or decreasing in any material way.
Capital
Resources. The Partnership does not have, nor does it expect
to have, any capital assets. Redemptions of units of limited
partnership interest (“Unit(s)”) in the future will affect the amount of funds
available for investments in futures, forwards and options in subsequent
periods. It is not possible to estimate the amount, and therefore the
impact, of future outflows of Units.
There are
no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable, that would affect, nor any
expected material changes to, the Partnership’s capital resource arrangements at
the present time.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements and Contractual Obligations. The Partnership does
not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, nor does it have contractual
obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments that would affect
its liquidity or capital resources.
Results of
Operations
General. The
Partnership’s results depend on the Trading Advisors and the ability of the
Trading Advisor’s trading program to take advantage of price movements in the
futures, forward and options markets. The following presents a
summary of the Partnership’s operations for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and a general discussion of its trading
activities during each period. It is important to note, however, that
the Trading Advisor trades in various markets at different times and that prior
activity in a particular market does not mean that such market will be actively
traded by the Trading Advisor or will be profitable in the future.
- 22
-
Consequently,
the results of operations of the Partnership are difficult to discuss other than
in the context of the Trading Advisor’s trading activities on behalf of the
Partnership during the period in question. Past performance is no
guarantee of future results.
The
Partnership’s results of operations set forth in the Financial Statements on
pages 2 through 20 of this report are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP,
which require the use of certain accounting policies that affect the amounts
reported in these Financial Statements, including the following: the contracts
the Partnership trades are accounted for on a trade-date basis and marked to
market on a daily basis. The difference between their original
contract value and market value is recorded on the Statements of Operations as
“Net change in unrealized trading profit (loss)” for open (unrealized)
contracts, and recorded as “Realized trading profit (loss)” when open positions
are closed out. The sum of these amounts constitutes the
Partnership’s trading results. The market value of a futures contract
is the settlement price on the exchange on which that futures contract is traded
on a particular day. The value of a foreign currency forward contract
is based on the spot rate as of the close of business. Interest
income, as well as management fees and brokerage fees of the Partnership are
recorded on an accrual basis.
For the Three and Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009
The
Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling
$4,668,260 and expenses totaling $2,268,017, resulting in net income of
$2,400,243 for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The
Partnership’s net asset value per Unit increased from $9.81 at June 30, 2009, to
$10.04 at September 30, 2009.
- 23
-
The most
significant trading gains of approximately 3.4% were recorded within the
currency sector, primarily during July and September, from long positions in the
Australian dollar, Swiss franc, and New Zealand dollar versus the U.S. dollar as
the value of the U.S. dollar moved lower against these currencies on speculation
that the U.S. Federal Reserve might keep borrowing rates low after the U.S.
central bank indicated that it remained committed to its quantitative easing
program. Meanwhile, the value of the Australian dollar and New
Zealand dollar also moved higher in the wake of stronger gold
prices. Within the global stock index sector, gains of approximately
2.1% were experienced throughout a majority of the quarter from long positions
in U.S., European, Taiwanese, and Hong Kong equity index futures as prices
increased due to positive economic data and increased merger and acquisition
activity in the technology sector. Additional gains of approximately
1.1% were recorded in the metals markets throughout a majority of the quarter
from long futures positions in copper, zinc, and nickel as prices rose following
news that China’s economy expanded during the second quarter of 2009 and Chinese
manufacturing jumped in July, thereby spurring speculation that demand for base
metals might rise. Smaller gains were experienced from long positions
in silver and gold futures as prices moved higher amid a decline in the value of
the U.S. dollar. A portion of the Partnership’s gains for the quarter
was offset by losses of approximately 1.1% incurred within the energy sector
throughout a majority of the quarter. During July and August, losses
were recorded from long futures positions in crude oil and its related products
as prices decreased due to above-average U.S. stockpiles. Newly
established short futures positions in crude oil and its related products
resulted in losses during September as prices reversed higher after positive
economic data spurred optimism that energy demand might
rebound. Within the global interest rate sector, losses
of
- 24
-
approximately
0.8% were experienced primarily during July and August from short positions in
U.S., European, and Japanese fixed-income futures as prices increased on
investor sentiment that the slow pace of the global economic recovery and signs
of moderate inflation might lead central banks in these regions to maintain low
interest rates in the near term. Smaller losses of approximately 0.2%
were incurred within the agricultural markets, primarily during September, from
short futures positions in coffee as prices rose during the first half of the
month on concerns that adverse weather might disrupt harvests in Colombia and
Brazil, the world’s largest coffee producers.
The
Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling
$(2,180,280) and expenses totaling $7,819,320, resulting in a net loss of
$9,999,600 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The
Partnership’s net asset value per Unit decreased from $10.88 at December 31,
2008, to $10.04 at September 30, 2009.
The most
significant trading losses of approximately 2.5% were recorded within the global
interest rate sector, primarily during April, June, July, and
August. During April and June, losses were experienced from long
positions in European and Australian fixed-income futures as prices reversed
lower after a pledge from G-20 leaders to support the global economy and
better-than-expected economic data reduced demand for the relative “safety” of
government bonds. Additional losses were incurred during July and
August from short positions in European and Japanese fixed-income futures as
prices increased on investor sentiment that the slow pace of the
- 25
-
global
economic recovery and signs of moderate inflation might lead central banks in
these regions to maintain low interest rates in the near term. Within
the energy markets, losses of approximately 0.9% were experienced primarily
during March and May from short futures positions in crude oil and its related
products as prices rose on hopes that government measures to support the U.S.
economy might boost energy demand. During July and August, losses
were recorded from long futures positions in crude oil and its related products
as prices decreased due to above-average U.S. stockpiles. Further
losses were incurred during September from newly established short futures
positions in crude oil and its related products as prices reversed higher after
positive economic data boosted speculation of a rebound in energy
demand. Additional losses of approximately 0.8% were experienced
within the global stock index sector, primarily during March and April, from
short positions in U.S., British, and Pacific Rim equity index futures as prices
increased after G-20 leaders indicated that participating governments and
central banks would “take whatever further actions are necessary to stabilize
the financial system”. Smaller losses of approximately 0.2% were
recorded within the agricultural markets, primarily during September, from short
futures positions in coffee as prices rose during the first half of the month on
concerns that adverse weather might disrupt harvests in Colombia and Brazil, the
world’s largest coffee producers. A portion of the Partnership’s
losses for the first nine months of the year was offset by gains of
approximately 3.1% experienced within the currency sector, primarily during
February, March, June, July, and September. During February and
March, long positions in the Australian dollar versus the U.S. dollar resulted
in gains as the value of the U.S. dollar decreased relative to most of its
rivals following the U.S. Federal Reserve’s surprise plans to begin a more
aggressive phase of quantitative easing. During June, gains were
recorded from short positions in the British pound versus the U.S. dollar as the
value of the U.S. dollar moved higher against the British pound following news
that U.S. payrolls fell less than expected in
May. Meanwhile,
- 26
-
long
positions in the Australian dollar versus the U.S. dollar also experienced gains
during June as the value of the Australian dollar increased relative to the U.S.
dollar amid a rise in risk appetite, which boosted demand for higher-yielding
currency assets. Lastly, gains were recorded during July and
September from long positions in the Australian dollar and Swiss franc versus
the U.S. dollar as the value of the U.S. dollar moved lower against these
currencies on speculation that the U.S. Federal Reserve might keep borrowing
rates low after the U.S. central bank indicated that it remained committed to
its quantitative easing program. Smaller gains of approximately 0.2%
were experienced within the metals markets, primarily during May, July, August,
and September, from long futures positions in silver as prices rose amid a
decline in the value of the U.S. dollar.
For the Three and Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008
The
Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling
$(5,428,232) and expenses totaling $4,412,087, resulting in a net loss of
$9,840,319 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The Partnership’s net
asset value per Unit decreased from $11.69 at June 30, 2008, to $11.14 at
September 30, 2008.
The most
significant trading losses of approximately 3.1% were incurred within the
currency sector, primarily during August and September, from long positions in
the Australian dollar, Singapore dollar, and Canadian dollar versus the U.S.
dollar as the value of the U.S. dollar reversed higher against most of its
rivals. Such losses were recorded during August after the U.S.
Commerce Department reported a larger than previously estimated increase in
Gross Domestic Product during the second quarter. The U.S. dollar
then moved sharply higher against these currencies during September in tandem
with surging U.S. Treasury prices amid a worldwide "flight-to-quality" due to
fears of an intense credit crunch and subsequent global
recession. Within
- 27
-
the
energy markets, losses of approximately 2.1% were experienced throughout the
majority of the quarter from long futures positions in crude oil and its related
products as prices reversed lower amid signs that the U.S. economic slump might
extend into 2009 and curb future energy demand. Additional losses of
approximately 1.1% were recorded within the global interest rate sector,
primarily during July and September, from short positions in European
fixed-income futures as prices increased amid a decline in the global equity
markets and growing speculation that the European Central Bank might not raise
interest rates due to weak economic growth. A portion of the
Partnership’s losses for the quarter was offset by gains of approximately 3.0%
recorded within the global stock index sector, primarily during July and
September, from short positions in U.S., European, and Pacific Rim equity index
futures as equity prices moved sharply lower amid unprecedented U.S. financial
market turmoil. Furthermore, global equity markets plunged after the
U.S. House of Representatives rejected the Economic Stabilization Act of 2008,
which would have allowed the U.S. Treasury to purchase troubled mortgage-backed
securities from U.S. financial institutions. Additional gains of
approximately 0.3% were experienced within the metals markets, primarily during
July and September, from short futures positions in copper and zinc as prices
dropped on concerns that turmoil in the financial markets would further weaken
the global economy and erode demand for base metals.
The
Partnership recorded total trading results including interest income totaling
$15,452,073 and expenses totaling $14,811,843, resulting in net income of
$640,230 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The Partnership’s net
asset value per Unit increased from $11.13 at December 31, 2007, to $11.14 at
September 30, 2008.
- 28
-
The most
significant trading gains of approximately 8.3% were recorded within the global
stock index sector from short positions in U.S., European, and Pacific Rim
equity index futures as prices decreased during January, February, March, and
June on concerns that a persistent U.S. housing slump, mounting losses linked to
U.S. sub-prime mortgage investments, rising commodity prices, and a weakening
job market could restrain consumer spending, erode corporate earnings, and curb
global economic growth. Additional gains were experienced in July and
September from short positions in global stock index futures as prices dropped
sharply amid unprecedented U.S. financial market turmoil following news of the
collapse of a major U.S. investment bank and the government rescue of a U.S.
insurance giant. Furthermore, global equity markets plunged after the
U.S. House of Representatives rejected the Economic Stabilization Act of 2008,
which would have allowed the U.S. Treasury to purchase troubled mortgage-backed
securities from U.S. financial institutions. Within the energy
markets, gains of approximately 0.8% were experienced, primarily during the
second quarter, from long futures positions in crude oil and its related
products as prices moved higher due to a drop in OPEC output, supply threats in
Nigeria and Iraq, growing Asian fuel consumption, and an unexpected decline in
domestic inventories. Elsewhere, short positions in natural gas
futures resulted in gains, primarily during August and September, as prices
declined amid rising inventories and news that the Atlantic hurricane season's
first storm had avoided the gas-producing fields in the Gulf of Mexico.
Additional gains of approximately 0.3% were recorded within the metals sector
from long positions in gold futures as prices increased during the first half of
the year due to a drop in the value of the U.S. dollar. Smaller gains
were experienced primarily during the third quarter from short futures positions
in zinc as prices decreased on concerns that turmoil in the financial markets
could further weaken the global economy and erode demand for base
metals. A portion of the Partnership’s gains for the first nine
months of the year was offset by losses of approximately 3.4% incurred within
the global
- 29
-
interest
rate sector from long positions in European fixed-income futures as prices
reversed lower in March following the U.S. Federal Reserve’s aggressive actions
to boost liquidity within the U.S. financial system, which temporarily renewed
investor optimism about the future direction of the global equity
markets. During April, long positions in Japanese fixed-income
futures resulted in additional losses as prices declined amid speculation that
the Bank of Japan might not reduce borrowing costs as much as previously
expected due to accelerating global inflation. Further losses were
experienced during the third quarter from newly established short positions in
European fixed-income futures as prices increased amid the aforementioned
decline in the global equity markets and growing speculation that the European
Central Bank might not raise interest rates due to weak economic
growth. Smaller losses of approximately 0.6% were recorded within the
currency sector, primarily during January and September, from short positions in
the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar as the value of the Japanese yen moved
higher against the U.S. dollar after extreme volatility in the global equity
markets and concerns of slowing economic growth in the U.S. caused investors to
sell higher-yielding assets funded by loans in Japan.
- 30
-
Item
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Introduction
The
Partnership is a commodity pool engaged primarily in the speculative trading of
futures, forwards and options. The market-sensitive instruments held
by the Partnership are acquired for speculative trading purposes only and, as a
result, all or substantially all of the Partnership’s assets are at risk of
trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of
market-sensitive instruments is inherent to the primary business activity of the
Partnership.
The
futures, forwards and options on such contracts traded by the Partnership
involve varying degrees of related market risk. Market risk is often
dependent upon changes in the level or volatility of interest rates, exchange
rates, and prices of financial instruments and commodities, factors that result
in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s open positions, and
consequently in its earnings, whether realized or unrealized, and cash
flow. Gains and losses on open positions of exchange-traded futures,
exchange-traded forward, and exchange-traded futures-styled options contracts
are settled daily through variation margin. Gains and losses on
off-exchange-traded forward currency contracts and forward currency options
contracts are settled upon termination of the contract. However, the
Partnership is required to meet margin requirements equal to the net unrealized
loss on open forward currency contracts in the Partnership accounts with the
counterparty, which is accomplished by daily maintenance of the cash balance in
a custody account held at MS&Co.
The
Partnership’s total market risk may increase or decrease as it is influenced by
a wide variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the diversification
among the Partnership’s open positions, the volatility present within the
markets, and the liquidity of the markets.
- 31
-
The face
value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership is typically many
times the applicable margin requirements. Margin requirements
generally range between 2% and 15% of contract face
value. Additionally, the use of leverage causes the face value of the
market sector instruments held by the Partnership typically to be many times the
total capitalization of the Partnership.
The
Partnership’s past performance is no guarantee of its future
results. Any attempt to numerically quantify the Partnership’s market
risk is limited by the uncertainty of its speculative trading. The
Partnership’s speculative trading and use of leverage may cause future losses
and volatility (i.e.,
“risk of ruin”) that far exceed the Partnership’s experience to date under the
“Partnership’s Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors” section and
significantly exceed the Value at Risk (“VaR”) tables disclosed.
Limited
partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the current net asset value of
their investment.
Quantifying the
Partnership’s Trading Value at Risk
The
following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk
exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe
harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be
forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for
statements of historical fact.
-
32 -
|
The
Partnership accounts for open positions on the basis of mark to market
accounting principles. Any loss in the market value of the
Partnership’s open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s earnings
and cash flow.
The
Partnership’s risk exposure in the market sectors traded by the Trading Advisor
is estimated below in terms of VaR. The Partnership estimates VaR
using a model based upon historical simulation (with a confidence level of 99%)
which involves constructing a distribution of hypothetical daily changes in the
value of a trading portfolio. The VaR model takes into account linear
exposures to risk including equity and commodity prices, interest rates, foreign
exchange rates, and correlation among these variables. The hypothetical changes
in portfolio value are based on daily percentage changes observed in key market
indices or other market factors (“market risk factors”) to which the portfolio
is sensitive. The one-day 99% confidence level of the Partnership’s
VaR corresponds to the negative change in portfolio value that, based on
observed market risk factors, would have been exceeded once in 100 trading days,
or one day in 100. VaR typically does not represent the worst case
outcome. Demeter uses approximately four years of daily market data
(1,000 observations) and re-values its portfolio (using delta-gamma
approximations) for each of the historical market moves that occurred over this
time period. This generates a probability distribution of daily
“simulated profit and loss” outcomes. The VaR is the appropriate
percentile of this distribution. For example, the 99% one-day VaR
would represent the 10th worst outcome from Demeter’s simulated profit and loss
series.
The
Partnership’s VaR computations are based on the risk representation of the
underlying benchmark for each instrument or contract and do not distinguish
between exchange and non-exchange dealer-based instruments. They are
also not based on exchange and/or dealer-based maintenance margin
requirements.
- 33
-
VaR
models, including the Partnership’s are continually evolving as trading
portfolios become more diverse and modeling techniques and systems capabilities
improve. Please note that the VaR model is used to numerically
quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by
either Demeter or the
Trading
Advisor in their daily risk management activities. Please further
note that VaR as described above may not be comparable to similarly-titled
measures used by other entities.
The Partnership’s Value at
Risk in Different Market Sectors
The
following table indicates the VaR associated with the Partnership’s open
positions as a percentage of total net assets by primary market risk category at
September 30, 2009 and 2008. At September 30, 2009 and 2008, the
Partnership’s total capitalization was approximately $105 million and $186
million, respectively.
Primary
Market
|
September
30, 2009
|
September
30, 2008
|
Risk Category
|
Value at Risk
|
Value at Risk
|
Equity
|
(2.40)%
|
(0.18)%
|
Currency
|
(1.25)
|
(0.47)
|
Interest
Rate
|
(0.82)
|
(0.54)
|
Commodity
|
(0.54)
|
(0.19)
|
Aggregate
Value at Risk
|
(2.82)%
|
(0.53)%
|
The VaR
for a market category represents the one-day downside risk for the aggregate
exposures associated with this market category. The Aggregate Value
at Risk listed above represents the VaR of the Partnership’s open positions
across all the market categories, and is less than the sum of the VaRs for all
such market categories due to the diversification benefit across asset
classes.
- 34
-
Because
the business of the Partnership is the speculative trading of futures, forwards
and options on such contracts, the composition of its trading portfolio can
change significantly over any given time period, or even within a single trading
day. Such changes could positively or negatively materially
impact market risk as measured by VaR.
The table
below supplements the quarter-end VaR set forth above by presenting the
Partnership’s high, low, and average VaR, as a percentage of total net assets
for the four quarter-end reporting periods from October 1, 2008 through
September 30, 2009.
Primary Market Risk
Category
|
High
|
Low
|
Average
|
Equity
|
(2.40)%
|
(0.07)%
|
(0.90)%
|
Currency
|
(1.25)
|
(0.31)
|
(0.81)
|
Interest
Rate
|
(0.82)
|
(0.38)
|
(0.58)
|
Commodity
|
(0.63)
|
(0.08)
|
(0.39)
|
Aggregate
Value at Risk
|
(2.82)%
|
(0.59)%
|
(1.57)%
|
Limitations on Value at Risk
as an Assessment of Market Risk
VaR
models permit estimation of a portfolio’s aggregate market risk exposure,
incorporating a range of varied market risks, reflect risk reduction due to
portfolio diversification or hedging activities, and can cover a wide range of
portfolio assets. However, VaR risk measures should be viewed in light of the
methodology’s limitations, which include, but may not be limited to the
following:
·
|
past
changes in market risk factors will not always result in accurate
predictions of the distributions and correlations of future market
movements;
|
- 35
-
·
|
changes
in portfolio value caused by market movements may differ from those of the
VaR model;
|
·
|
VaR
results reflect past market fluctuations applied to current trading
positions while future risk depends on future
positions;
|
·
|
VaR
using a one-day time horizon does not fully capture the market risk of
positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged within one day;
and
|
·
|
the
historical market risk factor data used for VaR estimation may provide
only limited insight into losses that could be incurred under certain
unusual market movements.
|
In
addition, the VaR tables above, as well as the past performance of the
Partnership, give no indication of the Partnership’s potential “risk of
ruin”.
.
The VaR
tables provided present the results of the Partnership’s VaR for each of the
Partnership’s market risk exposures and on an aggregate basis at September 30,
2009 and 2008, and for the four quarter-end reporting periods from October 1,
2008, through September 30, 2009. VaR is not necessarily
representative of the Partnership’s historic risk, nor should it be used to
predict the Partnership’s future financial performance or its ability to manage
or monitor risk. There can be no assurance that the Partnership’s
actual losses on a particular day will not exceed the VaR amounts indicated
above or that such losses will not occur more than once in 100 trading
days.
Non-Trading
Risk
The
Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash
balances. These balances and any market risk they may represent are
immaterial.
- 36
-
The
Partnership also maintains a substantial portion of its available assets in cash
at MS&Co.; as of September 30, 2009, such amount was equal to approximately
89% of the Partnership’s net asset value. A decline in short-term
interest rates would result in a decline in the Partnership’s cash management
income. This cash flow risk is not considered to be material.
Materiality,
as used throughout this section, is based on an assessment of reasonably
possible market movements and any associated potential losses, taking into
account the leverage, optionality, and multiplier features of the Partnership’s
market-sensitive instruments, in relation to the Partnership’s net
assets.
Qualitative Disclosures
Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures
The
following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk
exposures - except for (A) those disclosures that are statements of historical
fact and (B) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its primary market
risk exposures - constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act. The Partnership’s primary market risk exposures, as well as the strategies
used and to be used by Demeter and the Trading Advisor for managing such
exposures, are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any
one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership’s risk controls
to differ materially from the objectives of such
strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations,
illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political
upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market
participants, increased regulation, and many other factors could result in
material losses, as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the
risk management strategies of the Partnership.
- 37
-
The
Trading Advisor, in
general, tends to utilize its trading system(s) to take positions when
market opportunities develop, and Demeter anticipates that the Trading Advisor
will continue to do so.
Investors
must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the
Partnership.
The
following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Partnership at
September 30, 2009, by market sector. It may be anticipated, however,
that these market exposures will vary materially over time.
Equity. The
largest market exposure of the Partnership at September 30, 2009, was to the
global stock index sector. Exposure was primarily to equity price
risk in the G-7 countries. The G-7 countries consist of France, the
U.S., the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Italy, and Canada. The
stock index futures traded by the Partnership are by law limited to futures on
broadly-based indices. At September 30, 2009, the Partnership’s
primary exposures were to the IBEX 35 (Spain), Euro Stox 50 (Europe), NASDAQ 100
(U.S.), DAX (Germany), FTSE 100 (United Kingdom), S&P 500 (U.S.), Nikkei 225
(Japan), SPI 200 (Australia), Hang Seng (Hong Kong), Taiwan (Taiwan), AEX (The
Netherlands), and CAC 40 (France) stock indices. The Partnership is
exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the U.S.,
European, and Pacific Rim stock indices. Static markets would not cause major
market changes, but would make it difficult for the Partnership to avoid
trendless price movements, resulting in numerous small losses.
Currency. The
second largest market exposure of the Partnership at September 30, 2009, was to
the currency sector. The Partnership’s currency exposure is to
exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which
- 38
-
disrupt
the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency
pairs. Interest rate changes, as well as political and general
economic conditions influence these fluctuations. At September 30,
2009, the Partnership’s major exposures were to euro, British pound, and
Japanese yen currency crosses, as well as to outright U.S. dollar
positions. Outright positions consist of the U.S. dollar vs. other
currencies. These other currencies include major and minor
currencies. Demeter does not anticipate that the risk associated with
the Partnership’s currency trades will change significantly in the
future.
Interest
Rate. At September 30, 2009, the Partnership had market
exposure to the global interest rate sector. Exposure was primarily
spread across the European, U.S., Australian, Japanese, and Canadian interest
rate sectors. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of
the sovereign bond futures positions held by the Partnership and indirectly
affect the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest
rate movements in one country, as well as relative interest rate movements
between countries, materially impact the Partnership’s profitability. The
Partnership’s primary interest rate exposure is generally to interest rate
fluctuations in the U.S. and the other G-7 countries. However, the
Partnership also takes futures positions in the government debt of smaller
countries – e.g.,
Australia. Demeter anticipates that the G-7 countries’ interest rates
will remain the primary interest rate exposure of the Partnership for the
foreseeable future. The speculative futures positions held by the
Partnership may range from short to long-term instruments. Consequently, changes
in short, medium, or long-term interest rates may have an effect on the
Partnership.
- 39
-
-
Commodity.
Metals. The
third largest market exposure of the Partnership at September 30, 2009, was to
the metals sector. The Partnership's metals exposure was to
fluctuations in the price of precious metals, such as silver and gold, as well
as base metals, such as copper, zinc, and nickel. Economic forces,
supply and demand inequalities, geopolitical factors, and market expectations
influence price movements in these markets.
Energy. At
September 30, 2009, the Partnership had market exposure to the energy
sector. The Partnership’s energy exposure was primarily to futures
contracts in crude oil and its related products, as well as in natural
gas. Price movements in these markets result from geopolitical
developments, particularly in the Middle East, as well as weather patterns and
other economic fundamentals. Significant profits and losses, which have been
experienced in the past, are expected to continue to be experienced in the
future. Natural gas has exhibited volatility in prices resulting from
weather pattern and supply and demand factors and will likely continue in this
choppy pattern.
Soft Commodities and
Agriculturals. At September 30, 2009, the Partnership had
market exposure to the markets that comprise these sectors. Most of
the exposure was to the wheat, corn, and coffee markets. Supply and demand
inequalities, severe weather disruptions, and market expectations affect price
movements in these markets.
- 40
-
Qualitative Disclosures
Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure
The
following was the only non-trading risk exposure of the Partnership at September
30, 2009:
Foreign Currency
Balances. The Partnership’s primary foreign currency balances at
September 30, 2009, were in euros, British pounds, Hong Kong dollars, Japanese
yen, Canadian dollars, and Australian dollars. The Partnership
controls the non-trading risk of foreign currency balances by regularly
converting them back into U.S. dollars upon liquidation of their respective
positions.
Qualitative Disclosures
Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure
The
Partnership and the Trading Advisor, separately, attempt to manage the risk of
the Partnership’s open positions in essentially the same manner in all market
categories traded. Demeter attempts to manage market exposure by diversifying
the Partnership’s assets among different market sectors through the selection of
a Commodity Trading Advisor and by daily monitoring its
performance. In addition, the Trading Advisor establishes
diversification guidelines, often set in terms of the maximum margin to be
committed to positions in any one market sector or market-sensitive
instrument.
Demeter
monitors and controls the risk of the Partnership’s non-trading instrument,
cash. Cash is the only Partnership investment directed by Demeter, rather than
the Trading Advisor.
- 41
-
Item
4. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
As of the
end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the President and Chief
Financial Officer of Demeter, have evaluated the effectiveness of the
Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act), and have judged such controls and procedures
to be effective.
Changes in Internal Control
over Financial Reporting
There
have been no material changes during the period covered by this quarterly report
in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that have materially affected
or are reasonably likely to affect the Partnership’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Limitations on the
Effectiveness of Controls
Any
control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide reasonable
(not absolute) assurance that its objectives will be
met. Furthermore, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been
detected.
Item 4T. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
Not
applicable.
- 42
-
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
There
have been no material changes from the risk factors previously referenced in the
Partnership’s Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008.
Item
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
31.01
|
Certification
of President of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the
Partnership, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.02
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner
of the Partnership, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.01
|
Certification
of President of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the
Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.02
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner
of the Partnership, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
– 43
–
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Morgan
Stanley Smith Barney Charter Campbell L.P.
|
|||
(Registrant)
|
|||
By:
|
Demeter
Management LLC
|
||
(General
Partner)
|
|||
November
12, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/Christian
Angstadt
|
|
Christian
Angstadt
|
|||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
The
General Partner which signed the above is the only party authorized to act for
the registrant. The registrant has no principal executive officer,
principal financial officer, controller, or principal accounting officer and has
no Board of Directors.
- 44
-