Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INC | d69995exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INC | d69995exv31w2.htm |
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INC | d69995exv10w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INC | d69995exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INC | d69995exv31w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009 | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number.
001-32878
Penson Worldwide,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
75-2896356 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 1400 Dallas, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) |
75201 (Zip Code) |
(214) 765-1100
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 5, 2009, there were 25,457,258 shares
of the registrants $.01 par value common stock
outstanding.
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
INDEX TO
FORM 10-Q
1
Table of Contents
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands, |
||||||||
except par values) | ||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 146,525 | $ | 38,825 | ||||
Cash and securities segregated under federal and
other regulations
|
3,345,945 | 2,383,948 | ||||||
Receivable from broker-dealers and clearing organizations
(including securities at fair value of $2,649 at
September 30, 2009 and $17,369 at December 31, 2008)
|
435,864 | 318,278 | ||||||
Receivable from customers, net
|
1,418,348 | 687,194 | ||||||
Receivable from correspondents
|
109,344 | 135,092 | ||||||
Securities borrowed
|
1,299,345 | 964,080 | ||||||
Securities owned, at fair value
|
281,655 | 429,531 | ||||||
Deposits with clearing organizations (including securities at
fair value of $377,398 at September 30, 2009 and $290,316
at December 31, 2008)
|
443,287 | 327,544 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
34,776 | 28,428 | ||||||
Other assets
|
399,404 | 226,275 | ||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 7,914,493 | $ | 5,539,195 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Payable to broker-dealers and clearing organizations
|
$ | 415,573 | $ | 345,094 | ||||
Payable to customers
|
5,396,852 | 3,575,401 | ||||||
Payable to correspondents
|
276,120 | 161,422 | ||||||
Short-term bank loans
|
363,406 | 130,846 | ||||||
Notes payable
|
113,605 | 75,000 | ||||||
Securities loaned
|
885,120 | 842,034 | ||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased, at fair value
|
71,245 | 48,383 | ||||||
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities
|
99,949 | 96,548 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
7,621,870 | 5,274,728 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares
authorized; none issued and outstanding as of September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008
|
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 28,877 shares issued and 25,429 outstanding as
of September 30, 2009; 28,604 shares issued and 25,207
outstanding as of December 31, 2008
|
289 | 286 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
256,838 | 244,052 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
1,112 | (3,025 | ) | |||||
Retained earnings
|
88,141 | 76,471 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 3,448 and 3,397 shares of common
stock at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
(53,757 | ) | (53,317 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity
|
292,623 | 264,467 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$ | 7,914,493 | $ | 5,539,195 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share data)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
Clearing and commission fees
|
$ | 36,911 | $ | 40,215 | $ | 110,219 | $ | 114,076 | ||||||||
Technology
|
6,266 | 6,190 | 18,383 | 16,089 | ||||||||||||
Interest, gross
|
25,096 | 47,250 | 77,973 | 140,662 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
12,551 | 11,267 | 35,837 | 32,344 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
80,824 | 104,922 | 242,412 | 303,171 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense from securities operations
|
8,601 | 25,620 | 26,951 | 79,061 | ||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
72,223 | 79,302 | 215,461 | 224,110 | ||||||||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits
|
27,204 | 28,197 | 85,321 | 86,497 | ||||||||||||
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
|
8,544 | 8,568 | 24,719 | 21,063 | ||||||||||||
Communications and data processing
|
11,745 | 10,274 | 33,870 | 29,041 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment
|
7,422 | 7,810 | 22,032 | 22,125 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses
|
7,652 | 11,507 | 24,533 | 27,795 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense on long-term debt
|
3,480 | 885 | 6,041 | 3,047 | ||||||||||||
66,047 | 67,241 | 196,516 | 189,568 | |||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
6,176 | 12,061 | 18,945 | 34,542 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
2,309 | 4,583 | 7,275 | 13,085 | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 3,867 | $ | 7,478 | $ | 11,670 | $ | 21,457 | ||||||||
Earnings per share basic
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.85 | ||||||||
Earnings per share diluted
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.84 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
25,411 | 25,108 | 25,334 | 25,227 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
25,765 | 25,811 | 25,570 | 25,517 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
Table of Contents
Accumulated |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred |
Common Stock |
Additional paid-in |
Treasury |
Comprehensive |
Retained |
Stockholders |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Shares | Amount | Capital | Stock | Income (Loss) | Earnings | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
$ | | 25,207 | $ | 286 | $ | 244,052 | $ | (53,317 | ) | $ | (3,025 | ) | $ | 76,471 | $ | 264,467 | |||||||||||||||
Net income
|
| | | | | | 11,670 | 11,670 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $2,667
|
| | | | | 4,137 | | 4,137 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
15,807 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
| (52 | ) | | | (440 | ) | | | (440 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
| 186 | 2 | 3,805 | | | | 3,807 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess tax deficiency from stock-based compensation plans
|
| | | (389 | ) | | | | (389 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
| 53 | 1 | 313 | | | | 314 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
| 35 | | 235 | | | | 235 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity component of the conversion feature attributable to
senior convertible notes, net of tax of $5,593
|
| | | 8,822 | | | | 8,822 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2009
|
$ | | 25,429 | $ | 289 | $ | 256,838 | $ | (53,757 | ) | $ | 1,112 | $ | 88,141 | $ | 292,623 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended |
||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 11,670 | $ | 21,457 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
14,657 | 15,243 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation
|
3,807 | 3,211 | ||||||
Debt discount accretion
|
869 | | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities exclusive of effects
of business combinations:
|
||||||||
Cash and securities segregated under federal and
other regulations
|
(938,905 | ) | (865,142 | ) | ||||
Net receivable/payable with customers
|
1,040,548 | 921,538 | ||||||
Net receivable/payable with correspondents
|
133,447 | (320,979 | ) | |||||
Securities borrowed
|
(325,022 | ) | 586,049 | |||||
Securities owned
|
175,559 | (35,685 | ) | |||||
Deposits with clearing organizations
|
(114,688 | ) | 12,749 | |||||
Other assets
|
(141,086 | ) | 82,458 | |||||
Net receivable/payable with broker-dealers and clearing
organizations
|
(51,220 | ) | 42,536 | |||||
Securities loaned
|
42,581 | (477,569 | ) | |||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased
|
15,926 | (12,944 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities
|
(1,385 | ) | 40,932 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(133,242 | ) | 13,854 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Business combinations, net of cash acquired
|
(21,653 | ) | (27,312 | ) | ||||
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(17,833 | ) | (13,614 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(39,486 | ) | (40,926 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of convertible notes
|
56,200 | | ||||||
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
|
20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||
Repayments of revolving credit facility
|
(25,000 | ) | | |||||
Net borrowing (repayments) on short-term bank loans
|
226,387 | (32,945 | ) | |||||
Exercise of stock options
|
| 168 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation plans
|
19 | 132 | ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
(440 | ) | (7,270 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock
|
314 | 684 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
277,480 | (19,231 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash
|
2,948 | (4,643 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
107,700 | (50,946 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
38,825 | 120,923 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 146,525 | $ | 69,977 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
|
||||||||
Interest payments
|
$ | 6,676 | $ | 15,441 | ||||
Income tax payments
|
$ | 2,547 | $ | 13,755 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except per share data or where noted)
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(in thousands, except per share data or where noted)
1. | Basis of Presentation |
Organization and Business Penson Worldwide,
Inc. (PWI or the Company) is a holding
company incorporated in Delaware. The Company conducts business
through its wholly owned subsidiary SAI Holdings, Inc.
(SAI). SAI conducts business through its principal
direct and indirect operating subsidiaries, Penson Financial
Services, Inc. (PFSI), Penson Financial Services
Canada Inc. (PFSC), Penson Financial Services Ltd.
(PFSL), Nexa Technologies, Inc. (Nexa),
Penson GHCO (Penson GHCO), Penson Asia Limited
(Penson Asia) and Penson Financial Services
Australia Pty Ltd (Penson Australia). Through these
operating subsidiaries, the Company provides securities and
futures clearing services including integrated trade execution,
clearing and custody services, trade settlement, technology
services, risk management services, customer account processing
and customized data processing services. The Company also
participates in margin lending and securities lending and
borrowing transactions, primarily to facilitate clearing and
financing activities.
PFSI is a broker-dealer registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), a member of the New York
Stock Exchange and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (FINRA), and is licensed to do business in
all fifty states of the United States of America. PFSC is an
investment dealer and is subject to the rules and regulations of
the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada. PFSL
provides settlement services to the London financial community
and is regulated by the Financial Services Authority
(FSA) and is a member of the London Stock Exchange.
Penson GHCO is a registered Futures Commission Merchant
(FCM) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(CFTC) and is a member of the National Futures
Association (NFA), various futures exchanges and is
regulated in the United Kingdom by the FSA. Penson Australia
holds an Australian Financial Services License and is a market
participant of the Australian Securities Exchange and a clearing
participant of the Australian Clearing House.
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of PWI and its
wholly-owned subsidiary SAI. SAIs subsidiaries include
among others, PFSI, Nexa, Penson Execution Services, Inc., GHP1,
Inc. (GHP1), which includes its direct and indirect
subsidiaries GHP2, LLC (GHP2), First Capitol Group,
LLC (FCG) and Penson GHCO and Penson Holdings, Inc.
(PHI), which includes its subsidiaries PFSC, PFSL,
Penson Asia and Penson Australia. All significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements as of and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 contained in this Quarterly
Report (collectively, the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements) were prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (U.S. GAAP) for all periods
presented.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited accompanying
condensed consolidated statements of financial condition and
related interim statements of income, cash flows, and
stockholders equity include all adjustments, consisting
only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair
presentation in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP
have been condensed or omitted in accordance with rules and
regulations of the SEC. These unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the Penson Worldwide, Inc. consolidated financial
statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008,
as filed with the SEC on
Form 10-K.
Operating results for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the entire year.
In connection with the delivery of products and services to its
clients and customers, the Company manages its revenues and
related expenses in the aggregate. As such, the Company
evaluates the performance of its business activities and
evaluates clearing and commission, technology, and interest
income along with the associated interest expense as one
integrated activity.
6
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The Companys cost infrastructure supporting its business
activities varies by activity. In some instances, these costs
are directly attributable to one business activity and sometimes
to multiple activities. As such, in assessing the performance of
its business activities, the Company does not consider these
costs separately, but instead, evaluates performance in the
aggregate along with the related revenues. Therefore, the
Companys pricing considers both the direct and indirect
costs associated with transactions related to each business
activity, the client relationship and the demand for the
particular product or service in the marketplace. As a result,
the Company does not manage or capture the costs associated with
the products or services sold, or its general and administrative
costs by revenue line.
Managements Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. The Company reviews all significant
estimates affecting the financial statements on a recurring
basis and records the effect of any necessary adjustments prior
to their issuance.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (the Codification), the single
source of accounting principles and the framework for selecting
the principles used in the preparation of financial statements
of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
in the United States. All guidance contained in the Codification
carries an equal level of authority. The Codification supersedes
all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards and was
effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009. The FASB
will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB
Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts;
instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates. The FASB
will not consider Accounting Standards Updates as authoritative
in their own right; these updates will serve only to update the
Codification, provide background information about the guidance,
and provide the bases for conclusions on the changes in the
Codification.
In May 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for
convertible debt instruments. This guidance requires that
entities with convertible debt instruments that may be settled
entirely or partially in cash upon conversion should separately
account for the liability and equity components of the
instrument in a manner that reflects the issuers economic
interest cost. The effect of the proposed new rules for the
Companys convertible debentures is that the equity
component would be included in the
paid-in-capital
section of shareholders equity on an entitys
consolidated balance sheet and the value of the equity component
would be treated as original issue discount for purposes of
accounting for the debt component of convertible debt. The
Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009. See
Note 9 for the impact on our consolidated condensed
financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative disclosure guidance
for financial instruments. The guidance requires an entity to
provide interim disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments and to include disclosures related to the methods
and significant assumptions used in estimating those
instruments. The Company adopted this guidance during the
quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this guidance
did not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated condensed financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance on estimating
fair value when the volume and level of transaction activity for
an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation
to normal market activity for the asset or liability.
Additionally, this guidance requires additional disclosures
regarding fair value in interim and annual reports. The Company
adopted this guidance during the quarter ended June 30,
2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated condensed financial statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for
subsequent events, which establishes standards on events that
occur after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of
the financial statements. This guidance
7
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
distinguishes events requiring recognition in the financial
statements and those that may require disclosure in the
financial statements. Furthermore, it requires disclosure of the
date through which subsequent events were evaluated. The Company
adopted this guidance during the quarter ended June 30,
2009. The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential
recognition
and/or
disclosure through November 6, 2009, the date the
consolidated condensed financial statements included in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
were issued.
2. | Acquisitions |
First
Capitol Group, LLC
In November 2007, our subsidiary Penson GHCO acquired all of the
assets of FCG, an FCM and a leading provider of technology
products and services to futures traders, and assigned the
purchased membership interest to GHP1 effective immediately
thereafter. We closed the transaction in November, 2007 and paid
approximately $9.4 million in cash, subject to a
reconciliation to reported actual net income for the period
ended November 30, 2008, as defined in the purchase
agreement and approximately 150 shares of common stock
valued at $2.2 million to the previous owners of FCG. In
addition, the Company agreed to pay an annual earnout in cash
for the two year period following the actual net income
reconciliation, based on average net income, subject to certain
adjustments including cost of capital, for the acquired
business. The Company paid approximately $8.7 million
related to the first year of the earnout period. The Company
finalized the acquisition valuation during the third quarter of
2008 and recorded goodwill of approximately $4.0 million
and intangibles of approximately $7.6 million. The
financial results of FCG have been included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements since the
November 30, 2007 acquisition date. On May 31, 2008,
Penson GHCO acquired substantially all of the assets of FCG as
part of an internal reorganization and consolidation of assets.
FCG currently conducts business as a division of Penson GHCO.
Goldenberg
Hehmeyer and Co.
In November 2006, the Company entered into a definitive
agreement to acquire the partnership interests of Chicago-based
GHCO, a leading international futures clearing and execution
firm. The Company closed the transaction on February 16,
2007 and paid $27.9 million, including cash and
approximately 139 shares of common stock valued at
$3.9 million to the previous owners of GHCO. In addition,
the Company agreed to pay additional consideration in the form
of an earnout over the next three years, in an amount equal to
25% of Penson GHCOs pre-tax earnings, as defined in the
purchase agreement executed with the previous owners of GHCO.
The Company did not make an earnout payment related to the first
and second years of the integrated Penson GHCO business.
Goodwill of approximately $2.8 million and intangibles of
approximately $1.0 million were recorded in connection with
the acquisition. The assets and liabilities acquired as well as
the financial results of Penson GHCO have been included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements since the
February 16, 2007 acquisition date.
Acquisition
of the clearing business of Schonfeld Securities,
LLC
In November 2006, the Company acquired the clearing business of
Schonfeld Securities LLC (Schonfeld), a New York
based securities firm. The Company closed the transaction in
November 2006 and in January 2007, the Company issued
approximately 1.1 million shares of common stock valued at
$28.3 million to the previous owners of Schonfeld as
partial consideration for the assets acquired of which
approximately $14.8 million was recorded as goodwill and
$13.5 million as intangibles. In addition, the Company
agreed to pay an annual earnout of stock and cash over a four
year period that commenced on June 1, 2007, based on net
income, as defined in the asset purchase agreement, for the
acquired business. The Company successfully completed the
conversion of the seven Schonfeld correspondents in the second
quarter of 2007. A payment of approximately $26.6 million
was paid in connection with the first year earnout that ended
May 31, 2008 and approximately $14.9 million has been
paid in connection with the second year of the year earnout that
ended May 31, 2009. At September 30, 2009, a liability
of approximately $15.5 million was accrued as a result of
the second year of the earnout ended May 31, 2009
8
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
($10.5 million) and four months of the year three earnout
ending May 31, 2010 ($5.0 million). This balance is
included in other liabilities in the condensed consolidated
statement of financial condition. The offset of this liability,
goodwill, is included in other assets.
3. | Computation of earnings per share |
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share
computation. Common stock equivalents related to stock options
are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation if
their effect would be anti-dilutive to earnings per share.
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Basic and diluted:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 3,867 | $ | 7,478 | $ | 11,670 | $ | 21,457 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
25,411 | 25,108 | 25,334 | 25,227 | ||||||||||||
Incremental shares from outstanding stock options
|
30 | 44 | 25 | 44 | ||||||||||||
Non-vested restricted stock
|
129 | 30 | 90 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Shares issuable
|
24 | 629 | 24 | 229 | ||||||||||||
Convertible debt
|
171 | | 97 | | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares and common share
equivalents diluted
|
25,765 | 25,811 | 25,570 | 25,517 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.85 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.84 | ||||||||
At September 30, 2009 and 2008, stock options and
restricted stock units totaling 1,043 and 1,093 were excluded
from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their
effect would have been anti-dilutive.
4. | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation
approaches, including market, income
and/or cost
approaches. The fair value model establishes a hierarchy which
prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure
fair value. This hierarchy increases the consistency and
comparability of fair value measurements and related disclosures
by maximizing the use of observable inputs and minimizing the
use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs
be used when available. Observable inputs reflect the
assumptions market participants would use in pricing the assets
or liabilities based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the
Companys own assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three
broad levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:
| Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation of these instruments does not require a high degree of judgment as the valuations are based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly available. | |
| Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable as of the measurement date, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets |
9
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. These financial instruments are valued by quoted prices that are less frequent than those in active markets or by models that use various assumptions that are derived from or supported by data that is generally observable in the marketplace. Valuations in this category are inherently less reliable than quoted market prices due to the degree of subjectivity involved in determining appropriate methodologies and the applicable underlying assumptions. |
| Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and not corroborated by market data. The Company does not currently have any financial instruments utilizing Level 3 inputs. These financial instruments have significant inputs that cannot be validated by readily determinable data and generally involve considerable judgment by management. |
The following is a description of the valuation techniques
applied to the Companys major categories of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
U.S.
government and agency securities
U.S. government securities are valued using quoted market
prices in active markets. Accordingly, U.S. government
securities are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value
hierarchy.
U.S. agency securities consist of agency issued debt and
are valued using quoted market prices. As such these securities
are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Canadian
government obligations
Canadian government securities include both Canadian federal
obligations and Canadian provincial obligations. These
securities are valued using quoted market prices. These bonds
are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy as the price quotations are not always from active
markets.
Corporate
debt
Corporate bonds are generally valued using quoted market prices.
Corporate bonds are generally classified in Level 2 of the
fair value hierarchy as prices are not always from active
markets.
Corporate
equity
Corporate equity securities represent exchange-traded securities
are generally valued based on quoted prices in active markets.
These securities are categorized in Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy.
Certificates
of deposit and term deposits
The fair value of certificates of deposits and term deposits is
estimated using third-party quotations. These deposits are
categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Money
market
Money market funds are generally valued based on quoted prices
in active markets. These securities are categorized in
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
10
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The following table summarizes by level within the fair value
hierarchy Receivable from broker-dealers and clearing
organizations, Securities owned, at fair
value, Deposits with clearing organizations
and Securities sold, not yet purchased, at fair
value as of September 30, 2009.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||
Receivable from broker-dealers and clearing organizations
|
||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities
|
$ | 2,649 | $ | | $ | 2,649 | ||||||
$ | 2,649 | $ | | $ | 2,649 | |||||||
Securities owned
|
||||||||||||
Corporate equity
|
$ | 982 | $ | | $ | 982 | ||||||
Corporate debt
|
| 59,038 | 59,038 | |||||||||
Certificates of deposit and term deposits
|
| 21,028 | 21,028 | |||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities
|
56,767 | | 56,767 | |||||||||
Canadian government obligations
|
| 93,240 | 93,240 | |||||||||
Money market
|
50,600 | | 50,600 | |||||||||
$ | 108,349 | $ | 173,306 | $ | 281,655 | |||||||
Deposits with clearing organizations
|
||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities
|
$ | 232,275 | $ | | $ | 232,275 | ||||||
Money market
|
145,123 | | 145,123 | |||||||||
$ | 377,398 | $ | | $ | 377,398 | |||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased
|
||||||||||||
Corporate equity
|
$ | 969 | $ | | $ | 969 | ||||||
Corporate debt
|
| 45,684 | 45,684 | |||||||||
Canadian government obligations
|
| 24,592 | 24,592 | |||||||||
$ | 969 | $ | 70,276 | $ | 71,245 | |||||||
5. | Segregated assets |
Cash and securities segregated under U.S. federal and other
regulations totaled $3,345,945 at September 30, 2009. Cash
and securities segregated under federal and other regulations by
PFSI totaled $2,981,193 at September 30, 2009. Of this
amount, $2,948,488 was segregated for the benefit of customers
under
Rule 15c3-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), against a requirement as of
September 30, 2009 of $2,969,794. An additional deposit of
$60,000 was made on October 2, 2009 as allowed by
Rule 15c3-3.
The remaining balance of $32,705 at the end of the period
relates to the Companys election to compute a reserve
requirement for Proprietary Accounts of Introducing
Broker-Dealers (PAIB) calculation, as defined,
against a requirement as of September 30, 2009 of $14,243.
The PAIB calculation is completed in order for each
correspondent firm that uses the Company as its clearing
broker-dealer to classify its assets held by the Company as
allowable assets in the correspondents net capital
calculation. In addition, $370,603, including cash of $134,144
was segregated for the benefit of customers by Penson GHCO
pursuant to CFTC Rule 1.20 at September 30, 2009.
Finally, $86,976 and $143,632 was segregated under similar
Canadian and United Kingdom regulations, respectively. At
December 31, 2008, $2,383,948 was segregated for the
benefit of customers under
Rule 15c3-3
of the Exchange Act and PAIB, and similar Canadian and United
Kingdom regulations.
11
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
6. | Receivable from and payable to broker-dealers and clearing organizations |
Amounts receivable from and payable to broker-dealers and
clearing organizations consists of the following:
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Receivable:
|
||||||||
Securities failed to deliver
|
$ | 108,988 | $ | 75,022 | ||||
Receivable from clearing organizations
|
326,876 | 243,256 | ||||||
$ | 435,864 | $ | 318,278 | |||||
Payable:
|
||||||||
Securities failed to receive
|
$ | 165,159 | $ | 41,108 | ||||
Payable to clearing organizations
|
250,414 | 303,986 | ||||||
$ | 415,573 | $ | 345,094 | |||||
Receivables from broker-dealers and clearing organizations
include amounts receivable for securities failed to deliver,
amounts receivable from clearing organizations relating to open
transactions, good-faith and margin deposits, and
floor-brokerage receivables. Payables to broker-dealers and
clearing organizations include amounts payable for securities
failed to receive, amounts payable to clearing organizations on
open transactions, and floor-brokerage payables. In addition,
the net receivable or payable arising from unsettled trades are
reflected in these categories.
7. | Securities owned and securities sold, not yet purchased |
Securities owned and securities sold, not yet purchased consist
of trading and investment securities at quoted market if
available, or fair values as follows:
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Securities Owned:
|
||||||||
Corporate equity and debt
|
$ | 60,020 | $ | 26,593 | ||||
Certificates of deposit and term deposits
|
21,028 | 82,049 | ||||||
U.S. government and agency securities
|
56,767 | 63,261 | ||||||
Canadian government obligations
|
93,240 | 51,428 | ||||||
Money market
|
50,600 | 206,200 | ||||||
$ | 281,655 | $ | 429,531 | |||||
Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased:
|
||||||||
Corporate equity and debt
|
$ | 46,653 | $ | 19,139 | ||||
Certificates of deposit and term deposits
|
| 9,658 | ||||||
Canadian government obligations
|
24,592 | 19,586 | ||||||
$ | 71,245 | $ | 48,383 | |||||
8. | Short-term bank loans and stock loan |
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Company had $363,406 and $130,846, respectively in short-term
bank loans outstanding under seven uncommitted lines of credit
with seven financial institutions. Five of
12
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
these lines of credit permitted the Company to borrow up to an
aggregate of approximately $308,522 while two lines do not have
specified borrowing limits. The fair value of short-term bank
loans approximates their carrying values.
The Company also has the ability to borrow under stock loan
arrangements. At September 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, the Company had $234,369 and $319,801, respectively in
borrowings and no specific limitations on additional borrowing
capacities. Borrowings under these arrangements bear interest at
variable rates, are secured primarily by our firm inventory and
customers margin account securities, and are repayable on
demand. The fair value of these borrowings approximates their
carrying values. The remaining balance in securities loaned
relates to the Companys conduit stock loan business.
9. | Notes Payable |
Revolving
Credit Facility
On May 1, 2009 the Company signed a new secured revolving
credit facility (the Credit Facility) with a
syndicate of financial institutions. The Credit Facility was
subsequently amended on May 27, 2009 and September 22,
2009. The Credit Facility allows the Company to borrow up to a
maximum $100,000 at a variable rate of interest (6.75% at
September 30, 2009) with a term of 364 days. The
Companys obligations under the Credit Facility are secured
by a guaranty from SAI and PHI, and a pledge by the Company, SAI
and PHI of the equity interests of certain of the Companys
subsidiaries. The Credit Facility contains various positive and
negative covenants, including certain financial covenants such
as maintenance of minimum consolidated tangible net worth, a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a maximum consolidated
leverage ratio, a minimum capital requirement, a minimum
liquidity requirement and maximum capital expenditures. As of
September 30, 2009 $70,000 was outstanding. The fair value
of the Credit Facility approximates its carrying value.
Subsequent to September 30, 2009, the Company amended the
Credit Facility that among other things, resulted in modified
financial covenants. See Note 18.
Senior
Convertible Notes
On June 3, 2009, the Company issued $60,000 aggregate
principal amount of 8.00% Senior Convertible Notes due 2014
(the Convertible Notes). The $60,000 aggregate
principal amount of Convertible Notes includes $10,000 issued in
connection with the exercise in full by the initial purchasers
of their over-allotment option. The net proceeds from the sale
of the convertible notes were approximately $56,200 after
initial purchaser discounts and other expenses.
The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.0% per year.
Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually in
arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning
December 1, 2009. The Convertible Notes will mature on
June 1, 2014, subject to earlier repurchase or conversion.
Holders may convert their Convertible Notes at their option at
any time prior to the close of business on the business day
immediately preceding the maturity date for such Convertible
Notes under the following circumstances: (1) during any
fiscal quarter after the fiscal quarter ending
September 30, 2009 (and only during such fiscal quarter),
if the last reported sale price of the Companys common
stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30
consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the
immediately preceding fiscal quarter is equal to or more than
120% of the conversion price of the Convertible Notes on the
last day of such preceding fiscal quarter; (2) during the
five
business-day
period after any five consecutive
trading-day
period in which the trading price per $1,000 (in whole dollars)
principal amount of the Convertible Notes for each day of that
period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported
sale price of the Companys common stock and the conversion
rate of the Convertible Notes on each such day; (3) upon
the occurrence of specified corporate transactions, including
upon certain distributions to holders of the Companys
common stock and certain fundamental changes, including changes
of control and dispositions of substantially all of the
Companys assets; and (4) at any time beginning on
March 1, 2014. Upon conversion, the Company will pay or
deliver, at the Companys option, cash, shares of the
13
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
Companys common stock or a combination thereof. The
initial conversion rate for the Convertible Notes will be
101.9420 shares of the Companys common stock per
$1,000 (in whole dollars) principal amount of Convertible Notes
(6,117 shares), equivalent to an initial conversion price
of approximately $9.81 per share of common stock. Such
conversion rate will be subject to adjustment in certain events,
but will not be adjusted for accrued or additional interest. In
addition, the Indenture provides that, in no event will the
Company issue shares upon conversion of Convertible Notes that
exceed 19.99% of its common stock outstanding as of June 3,
2009, unless it has obtained stockholder approval in accordance
with NASDAQ listing standards.
Following certain corporate transactions, the Company will
increase the applicable conversion rate for a holder who elects
to convert its Convertible Notes in connection with such
corporate transactions by a number of additional shares of
common stock. The Company may not redeem the Convertible Notes
prior to their stated maturity date. If the Company undergoes a
fundamental change, holders may require the Company to
repurchase all or a portion of the holders Convertible
Notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount
of the Convertible Notes to be purchased, plus any accrued and
unpaid interest, including any additional interest, to, but
excluding, the fundamental change purchase date.
The Convertible Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company
and contain customary covenants, such as reporting of annual and
quarterly financial results, and restrictions on certain
mergers, consolidations and changes of control. The Convertible
Notes also contain customary events of default, including
failure to pay principal or interest, breach of covenants,
cross-acceleration to other debt in excess of $20,000,
unsatisfied judgments of $20,000 or more and bankruptcy events.
The Convertible Notes contain no financial covenants.
The Company is required to separately account for the liability
and equity components of the Convertible Notes in a manner that
reflects the Companys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate
at the date of issuance when interest cost is recognized in
subsequent periods. The Company allocated approximately $8,822,
net of tax of $5,593, of the $60,000 principal amount of the
Convertible Notes to the equity component, which represents a
discount to the debt and will be amortized into interest expense
using the effective interest method through June 1, 2014.
Accordingly, the Companys effective interest rate on the
Convertible Notes will be 15.0%. The Company will recognize
interest expense during the twelve months ended May 2010 on the
Convertible Notes in an amount that approximates 15.0% of
$45,585, the liability component of the Convertible Notes at the
date of issuance. The Convertible Notes were further discounted
by approximately $2,850 for the costs associated with the
initial purchasers. These costs and other debt issuance costs
will be amortized into interest expense over the life of the
Convertible Notes. The interest expense recognized for the
Convertible Notes in the twelve months ended May 2011 and
subsequent periods will be greater as the discount is amortized
and the effective interest method is applied. For the three and
nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, the Company
recognized interest expense of $1,200 and $1,573, respectively,
related to the coupon and $509 and $679, respectively, related
to the conversion feature.
The estimated fair value of the Convertible Notes was estimated
using a discounted cash flow analysis based on our current
borrowing rate for an instrument with similar terms. At
September 30, 2009 the fair value of the Convertible Notes
approximated the carrying value of $46,265.
10. | Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk |
In the normal course of business, the Company purchases and
sells securities as both principal and agent. If another party
to the transaction fails to fulfill its contractual obligation,
the Company may incur a loss if the market value of the security
is different from the contract amount of the transaction.
The Company deposits customers margin account securities
with lending institutions as collateral for borrowings. If a
lending institution does not return a security, the Company may
be obligated to purchase the security in order to return it to
the customer. In such circumstances, the Company may incur a
loss equal to the amount by which the market value of the
security on the date of nonperformance exceeds the value of the
loan from the institution.
14
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
In the event a customer fails to satisfy its obligations, the
Company may be required to purchase or sell financial
instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the
customers obligations. The Company seeks to control the
risks associated with its customer activities by requiring
customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with
various regulatory and internal guidelines. The Company monitors
required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines,
requires customers to deposit additional collateral or to reduce
positions when necessary.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell are
collateralized by U.S. Government or
U.S. Government-guaranteed securities. Such transactions
may expose the Company to off-balance-sheet risk in the event
such borrowers do not repay the loans and the value of
collateral held is less than that of the underlying contract
amount. A similar risk exists on Canadian Government securities
purchased under agreements to resell that are a part of other
assets. These agreements provide the Company with the right to
maintain the relationship between market value of the collateral
and the contract amount of the receivable.
The Companys policy is to regularly monitor its market
exposure and counterparty risk. The Company does not anticipate
nonperformance by counterparties and maintains a policy of
reviewing the credit standing of all parties, including
customers, with which it conducts business.
For customers introduced on a fully-disclosed basis by other
broker-dealers, the Company has the contractual right of
recovery from such introducing broker-dealers in the event of
nonperformance by the customer.
In addition, the Company has sold securities that it does not
currently own and will therefore be obligated to purchase such
securities at a future date. The Company has recorded these
obligations in the financial statements at September 30,
2009, at fair values of the related securities and may incur a
loss if the fair value of the securities increases subsequent to
September 30, 2009.
11. | Stock-based compensation |
The Company makes awards of stock options and restricted stock
units (RSUs) under the Amended and Restated 2000
Stock Incentive Plan, as amended in May 2009 (the 2000
Stock Incentive Plan), under which 4,466 shares of
common stock have been authorized for issuance. Of this amount,
options and RSUs to purchase 2,564 shares of common stock,
net of forfeitures have been granted and 1,902 shares
remain available for future grants at September 30, 2009.
The Company also provides an employee stock purchase plan
(ESPP).
The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan includes three separate programs:
(1) the discretionary option grant program under which
eligible individuals in the Companys employ or service
(including officers, non-employee board members and consultants)
may be granted options to purchase shares of common stock of the
Company; (2) the stock issuance program under which such
individuals may be issued shares of common stock directly or
stock awards that vest over time, through the purchase of such
shares or as a bonus tied to the performance of services; and
(3) the automatic grant program under which grants will
automatically be made at periodic intervals to eligible
non-employee board members. The Companys Board of
Directors or its Compensation Committee may amend or modify the
2000 Stock Incentive Plan at any time, subject to any required
stockholder approval.
Stock
options
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, the Company did not grant any stock options to
employees.
The Company recorded compensation expense relating to options of
approximately $301 and $337, respectively, for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and $926 and $1,174,
respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008.
15
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
A summary of the Companys stock option activity is as
follows:
Aggregate |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted |
Intrinsic |
|||||||||||||||
Weighted |
Average |
Value of |
||||||||||||||
Number of |
Average |
Contractual |
In-the-Money |
|||||||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | Term | Options | |||||||||||||
(In whole dollars) | (In years) | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding, December 31, 2008
|
1,028 | $ | 17.35 | 4.78 | $ | 206 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Exercised
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(82 | ) | 19.74 | | | |||||||||||
Outstanding, September 30, 2009
|
946 | $ | 17.13 | 4.15 | $ | 329 | ||||||||||
Options exercisable at September 30, 2009
|
780 | $ | 16.85 | 4.19 | $ | 329 | ||||||||||
There were no options exercised during the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2009. At September 30,
2009, the Company had approximately $724 of total unrecognized
compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to
stock option plans that will be recognized over the weighted
average period of .97 years.
Restricted
Stock Units
A summary of the Companys Restricted Stock Unit activity
is as follows:
Weighted |
Weighted |
|||||||||||||||
Average |
Average |
Aggregate |
||||||||||||||
Number of |
Grant Date |
Contractual |
Intrinsic |
|||||||||||||
Units | Fair Value | Term | Value | |||||||||||||
(In whole dollars) | (In years) | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding, December 31, 2008
|
749 | $ | 12.06 | 2.88 | $ | 5,704 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
203 | 6.66 | | | ||||||||||||
Distributed
|
(185 | ) | 13.19 | | | |||||||||||
Terminated, cancelled or expired
|
(24 | ) | 16.53 | | | |||||||||||
Outstanding, September 30, 2009
|
743 | $ | 10.16 | 2.47 | $ | 7,234 | ||||||||||
The Company recorded compensation expense relating to restricted
stock units of approximately $710 and $626 during the three
month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $2,750 and $1,893 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
As of September 30, 2009, there is approximately $5,937 of
unamortized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures,
related to unvested restricted stock units outstanding that will
be recognized over the weighted average period of
2.42 years.
Employee
stock purchase plan
In July 2005, the Companys Board of Directors adopted the
ESPP, designed to allow eligible employees of the Company to
purchase shares of common stock, at semiannual intervals,
through periodic payroll deductions. A total of 313 shares
of common stock were initially reserved under the ESPP. The
share reserve will automatically increase on the first trading
day of January each calendar year, beginning in calendar year
2007, by an amount equal to 1% of the total number of
outstanding shares of common stock on the last trading day in
December in the prior calendar year. Under the current plan, no
such annual increase may exceed 63 shares.
16
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
The ESPP may have a series of offering periods, each with a
maximum duration of 24 months. Offering periods will begin
at semi-annual intervals as determined by the plan
administrator. Individuals regularly expected to work more than
20 hours per week for more than five calendar months per
year may join an offering period on the start date of that
period. However, employees may participate in only one offering
period at a time. Participants may contribute 1% to 15% of their
annual compensation through payroll deductions, and the
accumulated deductions will be applied to the purchase of shares
on each semi-annual purchase date. The purchase price per share
shall be determined by the plan administrator at the start of
each offering period and shall not be less than 85% of the lower
of the fair market value per share on the start date of the
offering period in which the participant is enrolled or the fair
market value per share on the semi-annual purchase date. The
plan administrator shall have the discretionary authority to
establish the maximum number of shares of common stock
purchasable per participant and in total by all participants in
that particular offering period. The Companys Board of
Directors or its Compensation Committee may amend, suspend or
terminate the ESPP at any time, and the ESPP will terminate no
later than the last business day of June 2015. As of
September 30, 2009, 500 shares of common stock had
been reserved and 354 shares of common stock had been
purchased by employees pursuant to the ESPP plan. The Company
recognized expense of $45 and $36 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and $131 and $144 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
12. | Commitments and contingencies |
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of business relating to matters
including, but not limited to, our role as clearing broker for
our correspondents. In some instances, but not all, where we are
named in arbitration proceedings solely in our role as the
clearing broker for our correspondents, we are able to pass
through expenses related to the arbitration to the correspondent
involved in the arbitration.
Under its bylaws, the Company has agreed to indemnify its
officers and directors for certain events or occurrences arising
as a result of the officer or director serving in such capacity.
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with
each of its directors that require us to indemnify our directors
to the extent permitted under our bylaws and applicable law.
Although management is not aware of any claims, the maximum
potential amount of future payments the Company could be
required to make under these indemnification agreements is
unlimited. However, the Company has a directors and officer
liability insurance policy that limits its exposure and enables
it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result
of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the
estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is
minimal and has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as
of September 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
13. | Income taxes |
The differences in income tax provided and the amounts
determined by applying the statutory rate to income before
income taxes results from the following:
Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Federal statutory income tax rate
|
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||||
Lower tax rates applicable to
non-U.S.
earnings
|
(2.1 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (1.5 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
2.0 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||
Return to provision
true-up
|
(1.6 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net
|
4.1 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
37.4 | % | 38.0 | % | 38.4 | % | 37.9 | % | |||||||||
17
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
14. | Segment information |
The Company is organized into operating segments based on
geographic regions. These operating segments have been
aggregated into three reportable segments; United States, Canada
and Other. The Company evaluates the performance of its
operating segments based upon operating income before unusual
and non-recurring items. The following table summarizes selected
financial information.
United |
||||||||||||||||
As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30,
2009
|
States | Canada | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
$ | 64,128 | $ | 13,770 | $ | 2,926 | $ | 80,824 | ||||||||
Interest, net
|
15,073 | 905 | 517 | 16,495 | ||||||||||||
Income before tax
|
3,328 | 2,785 | 63 | 6,176 | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
1,885 | 1,931 | 51 | 3,867 | ||||||||||||
Segment assets
|
5,996,667 | 1,643,447 | 274,379 | 7,914,493 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles
|
128,428 | 538 | 312 | 129,278 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
3,339 | 604 | 738 | 4,681 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
3,446 | 287 | 399 | 4,132 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles
|
756 | | | 756 |
United |
||||||||||||||||
As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30,
2008
|
States | Canada | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
$ | 81,223 | $ | 18,410 | $ | 5,289 | $ | 104,922 | ||||||||
Interest, net
|
18,257 | 2,703 | 670 | 21,630 | ||||||||||||
Income before tax
|
8,479 | 3,197 | 385 | 12,061 | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
5,037 | 2,163 | 278 | 7,478 | ||||||||||||
Segment assets
|
5,233,041 | 1,884,018 | 330,635 | 7,447,694 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles
|
98,995 | 538 | 312 | 99,845 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
3,125 | 322 | 882 | 4,329 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
3,320 | 396 | 357 | 4,073 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles
|
1,040 | | | 1,040 |
United |
||||||||||||||||
As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2009
|
States | Canada | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
$ | 195,263 | $ | 38,678 | $ | 8,471 | $ | 242,412 | ||||||||
Interest, net
|
46,870 | 2,748 | 1,404 | 51,022 | ||||||||||||
Income before tax
|
12,573 | 6,320 | 52 | 18,945 | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
7,241 | 4,409 | 20 | 11,670 | ||||||||||||
Segment assets
|
5,996,667 | 1,643,447 | 274,379 | 7,914,493 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles
|
128,428 | 538 | 312 | 129,278 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
15,055 | 981 | 1,797 | 17,833 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
10,214 | 859 | 1,119 | 12,192 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles
|
2,465 | | | 2,465 |
18
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
United |
||||||||||||||||
As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008
|
States | Canada | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
$ | 229,847 | $ | 56,852 | $ | 16,472 | $ | 303,171 | ||||||||
Interest, net
|
49,826 | 10,047 | 1,728 | 61,601 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before tax
|
22,563 | 12,089 | (110 | ) | 34,542 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
13,285 | 8,268 | (96 | ) | 21,457 | |||||||||||
Segment assets
|
5,233,041 | 1,884,018 | 330,635 | 7,447,694 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and intangibles
|
98,995 | 538 | 312 | 99,845 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
10,644 | 784 | 2,186 | 13,614 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
9,900 | 1,207 | 933 | 12,040 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles
|
3,192 | 11 | | 3,203 |
15. | Regulatory requirements |
PFSI is subject to the SEC Uniform Net Capital Rule (SEC
Rule 15c3-1),
which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital. PFSI
elected to use the alternative method, permitted by
Rule 15c3-1,
which requires that PFSI maintain minimum net capital, as
defined, equal to the greater of $250 or 2% of aggregate debit
balances, as defined in the SECs Reserve Requirement Rule
(Rule 15c3-3). At September 30, 2009, PFSI had net capital
of $97,047, and was $74,432 in excess of its required net
capital of $22,615. At December 31, 2008, PFSI had net
capital of $85,535, and was $66,558 in excess of its required
net capital of $18,977.
Our Penson GHCO, PFSL, PFSC and Penson Australia subsidiaries
are also subject to minimum financial and capital requirements.
All subsidiaries were in compliance with their minimum financial
and capital requirements as of September 30, 2009.
16. | Vendor related asset impairment |
In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc. is a Chapter 11
bankruptcy case filed on August 17, 2007 in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois
by Sentinel Management Group, Inc., a registered futures
commission merchant (Sentinel). Prior to the filing
of this action, Penson GHCO and Penson Financial Futures, Inc.
(PFFI) held customer segregated accounts with
Sentinel totaling approximately $36 million. Sentinel
subsequently sold certain securities to Citadel Equity Fund,
Ltd. and Citadel Limited Partnership. On August 20, 2007,
the Bankruptcy Court authorized distributions of 95 percent
of the proceeds Sentinel received from the sale of those
securities to certain FCM clients of Sentinel, including Penson
GHCO. This distribution to the Penson GHCO and PFFI customer
segregated accounts along with a distribution received
immediately prior to the bankruptcy filing totaled approximately
$25.4 million.
On May 12, 2008, a committee of Sentinel creditors,
consisting of a majority of non-FCM creditors, together with the
trustee appointed to manage the affairs and liquidation of
Sentinel (the Sentinel Trustee), filed with the
Court their proposed Plan of Liquidation (the Committee
Plan) and on May 13, 2008 filed a Disclosure
Statement related thereto. The Committee Plan allows the
Sentinel Trustee to seek the return from FCMs, including Penson
GHCO and PFFI, of a portion of the funds previously distributed
to their customer segregated accounts. On June 19, 2008,
the Court entered an order approving the Disclosure Statement
over objections by Penson GHCO and others. On September 16,
2008, the Sentinel Trustee filed suit against Penson GHCO and
PFFI along with several other FCMs that received distributions
to their customer segregated accounts from Sentinel. The suit
against Penson GHCO and PFFI seeks the return of approximately
$23.6 million of post-bankruptcy petition transfers and
$14.4 million of pre-bankruptcy petition transfers. The
suit also seeks to declare that the funds distributed to the
customer segregated accounts of Penson GHCO and PFFI by Sentinel
are the property of the Sentinel bankruptcy estate rather than
the property of customers of Penson GHCO and PFFI.
19
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
On December 15, 2008, over the objections of Penson GHCO
and PFFI, the court entered an order confirming the Committee
Plan, and the Committee Plan became effective on
December 17, 2008. On January 7, 2009, Penson GHCO and
PFFI filed their answer and affirmative defenses to the suit
brought by the Sentinel Trustee. Also, on January 7, 2009,
Penson GHCO, PFFI and a number of other FCMs that had placed
customer funds with Sentinel filed motions to withdraw the
reference with the federal district court for the Northern
District of Illinois, effectively asking the federal district
court to remove the Sentinel suits against the FCMs from the
bankruptcy court and consolidate them with other Sentinel
related actions pending in the federal district court. On
April 8, 2009, the Sentinel Trustee filed an amended
complaint, which added a claim for unjust enrichment. Penson
GHCO and PFFIs response seeking to dismiss this claim was
filed on May 8, 2009. On June 30, 2009, the Court
denied the motion to dismiss without prejudice. The Court also
held a preliminary pretrial hearing on June 30, 2009, and
ordered that the first trial of the Sentinel Trustees
claims against one FCM would commence on July 6, 2010, and
the thirteen remaining trials would be scheduled at one month
intervals thereafter. The trial of the Sentinel Trustees
claims against Penson GHCO and PFFI is scheduled to proceed from
September
20-23, 2010.
On July 31, 2009, Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their motion
for reconsideration of the Courts order denying their
motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim. On
September 1, 2009, the Court denied the motion for
reconsideration without prejudice. On September 11, 2009,
Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their amended answer and amended
affirmative defenses to the Sentinel Trustees amended
complaint. On October 28, 2009, the federal district court
for the Northern District of Illinois granted Penson GHCO, PFFI,
and certain other FCMs motions requesting removal of the
matters referenced above from the bankruptcy court, thereby
removing these matters to the federal district court. While the
trial schedule referenced above is still pending, it may change
given the granting of the motions removing these matters to the
federal district court.
The Company believes that the Court was correct in ordering the
prior distributions and Penson GHCO and PFFI intend to continue
to vigorously defend their position. However, there can be no
assurance that any actions by Penson GHCO or PFFI will result in
a limitation or avoidance of potential repayment liabilities. In
the event that Penson GHCO and PFFI are obligated to return all
previously distributed funds to the Sentinel Estate, any losses
the Company might suffer would most likely be partially
mitigated as it is likely that Penson GHCO and PFFI would share
in the funds ultimately disbursed by the Sentinel Estate.
17. | Stock repurchase program |
On July 3, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized the Company to purchase up to $25.0 million of
its common stock in open market purchases and privately
negotiated transactions. The repurchase program was completed in
October 2007. On December 6, 2007, the Companys Board
of Directors authorized the Company to purchase an additional
$12.5 million of its common stock. No shares were
repurchased during the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The Company has approximately $4.7 million available
under the current repurchase program as of September 30,
2009.
18. | Subsequent events |
On November 2, 2009, PWI, together with PFSI, entered into
an asset purchase agreement (the Asset Purchase
Agreement) with Broadridge Financial Solutions,
Inc. (Broadridge) and its wholly owned subsidiary
Ridge Clearing & Outsourcing Solutions, Inc.
(Ridge) to acquire substantially all of Ridges
contracts with its securities clearing clients.
Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, PWI will pay
between $60 million and $70 million in total
consideration (the Purchase Price) to Broadridge
consisting of (a) a five-year subordinated note (the
Seller Note) payable by PWI bearing interest at an
annual rate equal to
90-day LIBOR
plus 5.5%, and (b) shares of PWIs common stock
(PWI Common Stock) equal to the lesser of
(i) the number of shares of PWI Common Stock equal to the
quotient of one third of the Purchase Price divided by the
volume weighted-average selling price of PWI Common Stock over
the 10 trading day period immediately prior to the closing,
(ii) the number of shares of PWI Common Stock
20
Table of Contents
Penson
Worldwide, Inc.
Notes to
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Continued)
equal to 9.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of PWI (the
Common Stock) as of the close of business on the
business day immediately prior to the closing, or
(iii) 2,517,451 shares of PWI Common Stock. The
specific amount of such consideration will be determined
immediately prior to closing pursuant to an agreed formula based
upon the revenues attributable to the contracts being purchased
by PFSI. The allocation of the consideration between the Seller
Note and the PWI Common Stock will also be determined prior to
the closing of the transaction. The Purchase Price will be
subject to certain adjustments post-closing upon the occurrence
of agreed upon events.
Concurrent with entering into the Asset Purchase Agreement, PWI
and Broadridge entered into a ten-year master services agreement
(the Outsourcing Agreement). Under the Outsourcing
Agreement, Ridge will provide certain securities processing and
back-office services to PFSI. This agreement will include
selective processing services for PFSIs existing
securities processing operations and back-office functions, as
well as selective processing services related to the clearing
client contracts acquired by PFSI from Ridge. The provision of
services under the Outsourcing Agreement is conditioned upon
finalization of certain service level agreements, receipt of
regulatory approvals and the closing of the transaction under
the Asset Purchase Agreement.
Concurrent with the closing of the transaction, the parties will
enter into a number of ancillary agreements, including a Joint
Selling Agreement and a Stockholders and Registration
Rights Agreement.
The Joint Selling Agreement will be entered into by Broadridge,
Ridge, PWI and PFSI and will have a term concurrent with the
term of the Outsourcing Agreement. Under the Joint Selling
Agreement, the parties will engage in activities to offer, in
the case of PFSI, Ridges self-clearing and securities
processing solutions, and in the case of Ridge, PFSI and its
affiliates correspondent clearing solutions, and will
mutually agree to fee arrangements with respect to activities
contemplated by the Joint Selling Agreement.
The Stockholders and Registration Rights Agreement will
restrict the transfer of the PWI Common Stock to be received as
a portion of the consideration for a period of one year from the
closing of the transaction. Thereafter, Broadridge will be
entitled to one demand registration right and piggy back
registration rights, subject to customary terms and conditions.
In addition, following expiration of the one-year restricted
period, Broadridge will be entitled to sell the PWI Common Stock
as permitted under SEC Rule 144. In the event PWI redeems
or repurchases any of its Common Stock, if necessary, it will
repurchase the PWI Common Stock on a pro rata basis on the same
terms and conditions so that Broadridges beneficial
ownership of PWI Common Stock will not exceed 9.9% of PWIs
issued and outstanding Common Stock following any such
repurchases or redemptions.
In addition, the Asset Purchase Agreement contemplates PWI
raising $50 million in additional regulatory capital with
respect to its operations pertaining to the correspondent
clearing contracts to be acquired. At PWIs option,
Broadridge has agreed to lend, under certain circumstances, this
amount to PWI pursuant to an eighteen-month subordinated note
(the Backstop Note) payable by PWI and bearing
interest at an annual rate equal to
90-day LIBOR
plus 14%.
The Seller Note and, if utilized, the Backstop Note, will be
subordinated to PWI bank debt and be subject to customary
subordination provisions. Therefore, among other things, in the
event there is a payment default, or other event of default that
would permit acceleration of PWI bank debt, payment on the
Seller Note and, if utilized, the Backstop Note, will be blocked
for up to 270 days in any twelve-month period.
On November 2, 2009 PWI entered into the Third Amendment
(the Third Amendment) to its Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, with Regions
Bank, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of
Credit Issuer, the lenders party thereto and other parties
thereto, as amended by the First Amendment on May 27, 2009
and Second Amendment dated September 22, 2009 (the
Credit Agreement). The Third Amendment, among other
things, makes changes to a number of covenants in the Credit
Agreement, including the financial covenants, in order to permit
the acquisition of the clearing contracts of Ridge and the
issuance of the Common Stock portion of the Purchase Price, the
Seller Note and the Backstop Note. In addition, the Third
Amendment authorizes PWI to raise additional capital. In the
event that the Backstop Note has been issued at the time of such
capital raising, the Third Amendment requires that the proceeds
will be used to repay the Backstop Note.
21
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with the Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
section and the consolidated financial statements and related
notes thereto included in our December 31, 2008 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
(File
No. 001-32878),
filed with the SEC and with the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto
presented in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
Overview
We are a leading provider of a broad range of critical
securities and futures processing infrastructure products and
services to the global financial services industry. Our products
and services include securities and futures clearing and
execution, financing and cash management technology and other
related offerings, and we provide tools and services to support
trading in multiple markets, asset classes and currencies.
Since starting our business in 1995 with three correspondents,
we have grown to serve approximately 244 active securities
clearing correspondents and 43 futures clearing correspondents
as of September 30, 2009. Our net revenues were
$72.2 million and $79.3 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, while our
net revenues were $215.5 million and $224.1 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Our revenues consist primarily of transaction
processing fees earned from our clearing operations and net
interest income earned from our margin lending activities, from
investing customers cash and from stock lending
activities. Our clearing and commission fees are based
principally on the number of trades we clear. We receive
interest income from financing the securities purchased on
margin by the customers of our clients. We also earn licensing
and development revenues from fees we charge to our clients for
their use of our technology solutions.
Fiscal
2009 Highlights
| We founded Penson Australia, which we expect to be operational in the fourth quarter of 2009. | |
| In June 2009 we issued $60 million of 8.00% convertible notes due June 1, 2014. | |
| In September 2009 we amended our revolving credit facility, increasing it to $100 million. | |
| We cleared more than 96 million option contracts in the third quarter, a new record. | |
| We moved additional customer segregated funds into higher yielding FDIC insured bank accounts during the quarter with approximately $2.3 billion moved as of September 30, 2009. | |
| On November 2, 2009 we signed a definitive agreement to acquire the clearing and execution services business of Ridge Clearing & Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. for an anticipated purchase price of between $60-$70 million. |
Financial
overview
Net
revenues
Revenues
We generate revenues from most clients in several different
categories. Clients generating revenues for us from clearing
transactions almost always also generate significant interest
income from related balances. Revenues from clearing
transactions are driven largely by the volume of trading
activities of the customers of our correspondents and
proprietary trading by our correspondents. Our average clearing
revenue per trade is a function of numerous pricing elements
that vary based on individual correspondent volumes, customer
mix, and the level of margin debit balances and credit balances.
Our clearing revenue fluctuates as a result of these factors as
well as changes in trading volume. We focus on maintaining the
profitability of our overall correspondent relationships,
including the clearing revenue from trades and net interest from
related customer margin balances, and by reducing associated
variable costs. We collect the fees for our services directly
from customer accounts when trades are processed. We only remit
22
Table of Contents
commissions charged by our correspondents to them after
deducting our charges. For this reason, we have no significant
receivables to collect.
We often refer to our interest income as Interest,
gross to distinguish this category of revenue from
Interest, net that is generally used in our
industry. Interest, gross is generated by charges to customers
or correspondents on margin balances and interest earned by
investing customers cash, and therefore these revenues
fluctuate based on the volume of our total margin loans
outstanding, the volume of the cash balances we hold for our
correspondents customers, the rates of interest we can
competitively charge on margin loans and the rates at which we
can invest such balances. We also earn interest from our stock
borrowing and lending activities.
Technology revenues consist of transactional, development and
licensing revenues generated by Nexa. A significant portion of
these revenues are collected directly from clearing customers
along with other charges for clearing services as described
above. Most development revenues and some transaction revenues
are collected directly from clients and are reflected as
receivables until they are collected.
Other revenues include charges assessed directly to customers
for certain transactions or types of accounts, trade aggregation
and profits from proprietary trading activities, including
foreign exchange transactions and fees charged to our
correspondents customers. Subject to certain exceptions,
our clearing brokers in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. each
generate these types of transactions.
Interest
expense from securities operations
Interest expense is incurred in our daily operations in
connection with interest we pay on credit balances we hold and
on short-term borrowings we make to fund activities of our
correspondents and their customers. We have two primary sources
of borrowing: commercial banks and stock lending institutions.
Regulations differ by country as to how operational needs can be
funded, but we often find that stock loans that are secured with
customer or correspondent securities as collateral can be
obtained at a lower rate of interest than loans from commercial
banks. Operationally, we review cash requirements each day and
borrow the requirements from the most cost effective source.
Revenues from clearing and commission fees represented 51% of
our total net revenues for the three months ended at each of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and 51% of our total net
revenues for each of the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Net interest income represented 23%
and 27% of our total net revenues for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 24% and 27%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Expenses
Employee
compensation and benefits
Our largest category of expense is the compensation and benefits
that we pay to our employees, which includes salaries, bonuses,
group insurance, contributions to benefit programs, stock
compensation and other related employee costs. These costs vary
by country according to the local prevailing wage standards. We
utilize technology whenever practical to limit the number of
employees and thus keep costs competitive. In the U.S., most of
our employees are located in cities where employee costs are
lower than where our largest competitors primarily operate. A
portion of total employee compensation is paid in the form of
bonuses and performance-based compensation. As a result,
depending on the performance of particular business units and
the overall Company performance, total employee compensation and
benefits could vary materially from period to period.
Other
operating expenses
Expenses incurred to process trades include floor brokerage and
exchange and clearance fees, and those expenses tend to vary
significantly with the level of trading activity. The related
data processing and communication costs vary less with the level
of trading activity. Occupancy and equipment expenses include
lease expenses for office space, computers and other equipment
that we require to operate our businesses. Other expenses
include legal, regulatory, professional consulting, accounting,
travel and miscellaneous expenses.
23
Table of Contents
In addition, as a public company, we incur additional costs for
external advisers such as legal, accounting, auditing and
investor relations services, as well as additional costs for
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Profitability
of services provided
Management records revenue for the clearing operations and
technology business separately. We record expenses in the
aggregate as many of these expenses are attributable to multiple
business activities. As such, net profitability before tax is
determined in the aggregate. We also separately record interest
income and interest expense to determine the overall
profitability of this activity.
Comparison
of the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008
Overview
Results of operations declined for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008 primarily due to lower clearing and
commission fees and lower net interest earned, partially offset
by higher other revenues. Clearing and commission fees decreased
due to lower equity and futures volumes, which was partially
offset by higher options volumes. The decline in net interest
earned is a result of higher customer average paying balances,
lower average balances in our conduit business and lower
interest spreads in the September 30, 2009 quarter as
compared to the year ago quarter. Other revenues increased due
to higher execution services revenues. Operating results
decreased $5.9 million during the third quarter of 2009 as
compared to the third quarter of 2008, for our U.S., Canadian
and London businesses.
Our U.S. operating subsidiaries experienced a decrease in
operating profits of approximately $3.8 million due to
lower net interest income and technology revenues and higher
communications and data processing costs resulting from a move
to SunGards latest generation system consisting of
equipment dedicated to our U.S. clearing business. Our
Canadian business experienced an operating profit of
$2.8 million for the September 30, 2009 quarter
compared to an operating profit of $3.2 million in the
September 30, 2008 quarter due primarily to decreases in
net interest income. London incurred an operating loss of
$1.4 million in the current quarter compared to an
operating loss of $1.0 million in the year ago quarter due
primarily to lower net interest income.
While we have continued to see profitability in our stock loan
conduit business, we have seen decreased demand resulting from
certain regulatory changes. The business consists of a
matched book where we borrow stock from an
independent party in the securities business and then loan the
exact same shares to a third party who needs the shares. We pay
interest expense on the borrowings and earn interest income on
the loans, earning an average net spread of 50 to 75 basis
points on the transactions. Due to regulatory and marketplace
changes regarding short-selling of certain securities, clearing
brokers that violate certain short-selling rules, including the
failure to timely deliver securities, are now subject to
significantly more stringent penalties. These changes as well as
potential future regulatory changes have had and may continue to
have a negative impact on the earnings we have historically seen
in our conduit business.
The above factors resulted in lower operating results for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2008.
24
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of the increases (decreases) in the
categories of revenues and expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
% |
||||||||
Change |
Change from |
|||||||
Amount | Previous Period | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||
Clearing and commission fees
|
$ | (3,304 | ) | (8.2 | ) | |||
Technology
|
76 | 1.2 | ||||||
Interest:
|
||||||||
Interest on asset based balances
|
(10,006 | ) | (34.9 | ) | ||||
Interest on conduit borrows
|
(10,366 | ) | (61.3 | ) | ||||
Money market
|
(1,782 | ) | (106.9 | ) | ||||
Interest, gross
|
(22,154 | ) | (46.9 | ) | ||||
Other revenue
|
1,284 | 11.4 | ||||||
Total revenues
|
(24,098 | ) | (23.0 | ) | ||||
Interest expense:
|
||||||||
Interest expense on liability based balances
|
(8,494 | ) | (71.6 | ) | ||||
Interest on conduit loans
|
(8,525 | ) | (62.0 | ) | ||||
Interest expense from securities operations
|
(17,019 | ) | (66.4 | ) | ||||
Net revenues
|
(7,079 | ) | (8.9 | ) | ||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits
|
(993 | ) | (3.5 | ) | ||||
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
|
(24 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Communications and data processing
|
1,471 | 14.3 | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment
|
(388 | ) | (5.0 | ) | ||||
Other expenses
|
(3,855 | ) | (33.5 | ) | ||||
Interest expense on long-term debt
|
2,595 | 293.2 | ||||||
(1,194 | ) | (1.8 | ) | |||||
Income before income taxes
|
$ | (5,885 | ) | (48.8 | ) | |||
Net
Revenues
Net revenues decreased $7.1 million, or 8.9%, to
$72.2 million from the quarter ended September 30,
2008 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The decrease
is primarily attributed to the following:
Clearing and commission fees decreased $3.3 million, or
8.2%, to $36.9 million during this same period primarily
due to a lower volume of equity and futures transactions, offset
in part by higher option volumes.
Technology revenue increased $.1 million, or 1.2%, to
$6.3 million due to higher recurring revenue offset by
lower development revenue.
Interest, gross decreased $22.2 million or 46.9%, to
$25.1 million during the quarter over quarter period.
Interest revenues from customer balances decreased
$11.8 million or 38.9% to $18.5 million as our average
daily interest rate decreased 93 basis points (during this
same period the average federal funds rate decreased
175 basis points) or 40.3% to 1.38% offset by an increase
in our average daily interest earning assets of
$441.9 million, or 8.9% to $5.4 billion. Interest from
our stock conduit borrows operations decreased
$10.4 million or 61.3% to $6.6 million, as a result of
a decrease in our average daily assets of $1.5 billion or
68.0% to $697.7 million, offset by
25
Table of Contents
an increase in our average daily interest rate of approximately
66 basis points, or 21.3% to 3.76%. (See page 22 for a
description of our conduit business.)
Other revenue increased $1.3 million, or 11.4%, to
$12.6 million due to increased execution services revenues
of $1.3 million and increased fees revenues, partially
offset by decreases in equity and foreign exchange trading.
Interest expense from securities operations decreased
$17.0 million, or 66.4%, to $8.6 million from the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 to the quarter ended
September 30, 2009. Interest expense from clearing
operations decreased approximately $8.5 million, or 71.6%,
to $3.4 million due to an 87 basis point or 75.7%
decrease in our average daily interest rate to .28% offset by an
increase in our average daily balances on our short-term
obligations of $649.7 million, or 15.8%, to
$4.8 billion. Interest from our stock conduit loans
decreased $8.5 million, or 62.0% to $5.2 million due
to a $1.5 billion, or 68.0% decrease in our average daily
balances to $695.6 million, offset by a 48 basis point
increase, or 19.0% in our average daily interest rate to 3.01%.
Interest, net decreased from $21.6 million for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 to $16.5 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009. This decrease was due to
a higher ratio of customer interest paying balances to interest
earning balances combined with significantly lower conduit
balances, and a lower interest rate spread of 6 basis
points on customer balances, offset slightly by a higher
interest rate spread of 18 basis points on conduit balances.
Employee
compensation and benefits
Total employee costs decreased $1.0 million, or 3.5%, to
$27.2 million from the quarter ended September 30,
2008 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, primarily due
to lower incentive-based compensation expense. Employee count
remained fairly constant, increasing by 1.3% to 1,020 as of
September 30, 2009.
Floor
brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees decreased less than
$.1 million, or .3%, to $8.5 million for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009 from the quarter ended
September 30, 2008, due to lower equity and futures volumes
offset in part by higher options volumes.
Communication
and data processing
Total expenses for our communication and data processing
requirements increased $1.5 million, or 14.3%, to
$11.7 million from the quarter ended September 30,
2008 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009. This increase
reflects costs associated with additional data processing
capacity resulting from a move to SunGards latest
generation system consisting of equipment dedicated to our
U.S. clearing business.
Occupancy
and equipment
Total expenses for occupancy and equipment decreased
$.4 million, or 5.0%, to $7.4 million from the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 to the quarter ended
September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to costs
associated with our occupancy leases.
Other
expenses
Other expenses decreased $3.9 million, or 33.5%, to
$7.7 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2008
to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, due to a
$2.4 million litigation reserve recorded in the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 and decreased travel expenses and
professional fees, offset in part by increased legal fees.
Interest
expense on long-term debt
Interest expense on long-term debt increased 293.2% from
$.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
to $3.5 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 as a result of higher interest rates on our revolving
credit facility, combined with additional interest expense of
approximately $1.9 million associated with our senior
convertible notes issued on June 3, 2009.
26
Table of Contents
Provision
for income taxes
Income tax expense, based on an effective income tax rate of
approximately 37.4%, was $2.3 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to an effective tax rate of
38.0% and income tax expense of $4.6 million for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is
primarily attributed to lower operating profit in the current
quarter. The lower effective rate is attributable to lower
pretax income in the United States.
Net
income
As a result of the foregoing, net income decreased to
$3.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
from $7.5 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2008.
Comparison
of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
September 30, 2008
Overview
Results of operations declined for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 primarily due to lower clearing and
commission fees, lower net interest revenue, higher floor
brokerage, exchange and clearance fees due to the timing of
rebates received in the prior year and higher communications and
data processing fees resulting from a move to SunGards
latest generation system consisting of equipment dedicated to
our U.S. clearing business, partially offset by higher
technology and other revenues. Technology increased due to
licensing revenue for the current nine month period that did not
begin until the third quarter of 2008. The decline in net
interest earned is a result of higher customer average paying
balances, lower average balances in our conduit business and
lower interest spreads on our customer balances in the current
period as compared to the year ago period, offset slightly by
higher interest rate spreads on our conduit business and higher
customer balances. Operating results declined $15.6 million
during the first nine months of 2009 as compared to the first
nine months of 2008, for our U.S., Canadian and London
businesses.
Our U.S. operating subsidiaries experienced a decrease in
operating profits of approximately $2.5 million due to
lower net interest income and higher communications and data
processing costs, offset in part by higher technology revenue.
Our Canadian business experienced an operating profit of
$6.3 million for the September 30, 2009 period
compared to an operating profit of $12.1 million in the
September 30, 2008 period due primarily to lower net
interest income. London incurred an operating loss of
$4.0 million in the current period compared to an operating
loss of $1.6 million in the year ago period, due primarily
to the loss of the contracts for difference business and lower
net interest income.
While we have continued to see profitability in our stock loan
conduit business, we have seen decreased demand resulting from
regulatory changes. The business consists of a matched
book where we borrow stock from an independent party in
the securities business and then loan the exact same shares to a
third party who needs the shares. We pay interest expense on the
borrowings and earn interest income on the loans, earning an
average net spread of 50 to 75 basis points on the
transactions. Due to regulatory and marketplace changes
regarding short-selling of certain securities, clearing brokers
that violate certain short-selling rules, including the failure
to timely deliver securities, are now subject to significantly
more stringent penalties. These changes and potential future
regulatory changes have had and may continue to have a negative
impact on the earnings we have historically seen in our conduit
business.
The above factors resulted in lower operating results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
27
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of the increases (decreases) in the
categories of revenues and expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
% |
||||||||
Change |
Change from |
|||||||
Amount | Previous Period | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||
Clearing and commission fees
|
$ | (3,857 | ) | (3.4 | ) | |||
Technology
|
2,294 | 14.3 | ||||||
Interest:
|
||||||||
Interest on asset based balances
|
(37,387 | ) | (40.5 | ) | ||||
Interest on conduit borrows
|
(22,348 | ) | (51.8 | ) | ||||
Money market
|
(2,954 | ) | (56.2 | ) | ||||
Interest, gross
|
(62,689 | ) | (44.6 | ) | ||||
Other revenue
|
3,493 | 10.8 | ||||||
Total revenues
|
(60,759 | ) | (20.0 | ) | ||||
Interest expense:
|
||||||||
Interest expense on liability based balances
|
(33,508 | ) | (75.0 | ) | ||||
Interest on conduit loans
|
(18,602 | ) | (54.1 | ) | ||||
Interest expense from securities operations
|
(52,110 | ) | (65.9 | ) | ||||
Net revenues
|
(8,649 | ) | (3.9 | ) | ||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||
Employee compensation and benefits
|
(1,176 | ) | (1.4 | ) | ||||
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
|
3,656 | 17.4 | ||||||
Communications and data processing
|
4,829 | 16.6 | ||||||
Occupancy and equipment
|
(93 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||
Other expenses
|
(3,262 | ) | (11.7 | ) | ||||
Interest expense on long-term debt
|
2,994 | 98.3 | ||||||
6,948 | 3.7 | |||||||
Income before income taxes
|
$ | (15,597 | ) | (45.2 | ) | |||
Net
Revenues
Net revenues decreased $8.6 million, or 3.9%, to
$215.5 million from the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributed to
the following:
Clearing and commission fees decreased $3.9 million, or
3.4%, to $110.2 million during this same period primarily
due to a lower volume of equity and futures transactions, offset
by an increase in options contracts and a change in our mix of
correspondents.
Technology revenue increased $2.3 million, or 14.3%, to
$18.4 million primarily due to approximately
$1.9 million in licensing revenue and higher recurring
revenue, offset by lower development revenue.
Interest, gross decreased $62.7 million or 44.6%, to
$78.0 million during the first nine months of 2009 compared
to the 2008 period. Interest revenues from customer balances
decreased $40.3 million or 41.4% to $57.1 million as
our average daily interest rate decreased 114 basis points
(during this same period the average federal funds rate
decreased 218 basis points) or 43.2% to 1.50% offset by an
increase in our average daily interest earning assets of
$223.5 million, or 4.8% to $4.9 billion. Interest from
our stock conduit borrows operations decreased
$22.3 million or 51.8% to $20.8 million, due to
decrease in our average daily assets of $1.0 billion or
28
Table of Contents
61.4% to $657.1 million, offset by an increase in our
average daily interest rate of approximately 84 basis
points, or 24.8% to 4.23% (see page 25 for a description of
our conduit business).
Other revenue increased $3.5 million, or 10.8%, to
$35.8 million due to increased revenues of
$1.3 million from our trade aggregation business in the U.S
and increased execution services revenues of $3.2 million,
offset by decreases in equity and foreign exchange trading.
Interest expense from securities operations decreased
$52.1 million, or 65.9%, to $27.0 million from the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 to the nine month
period ended September 30, 2009. Interest expense from
clearing operations decreased approximately $33.5 million,
or 75.0%, to $11.2 million due to a 118 basis point or
77.6% decrease in our average daily interest rate to .34%,
offset by an increase in our average daily balances of our
short-term obligations of $466.1 million, or 11.9%, to
$4.4 billion. Interest from our stock conduit loans
decreased $18.6 million, or 54.1% to $15.8 million due
to a $1.0 billion, or 61.3% decrease in our average daily
balances to $655.1 million, offset by a 50 basis point
increase, or 18.5% in our average daily interest rate to 3.21%.
Interest, net decreased from $61.6 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to $51.0 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease was
due to a higher ratio of customer interest paying balances to
interest earning balances combined with significantly lower
conduit balances, offset slightly by a higher interest rate
spread of 4 basis points on customer balances and
34 basis points on conduit balances.
Employee
compensation and benefits
Total employee costs decreased $1.2 million, or 1.4%, to
$85.3 million from the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily
due to lower incentive-based compensation expense, offset by
$.8 million of severance costs in the first quarter.
Employee count remained fairly constant, increasing 1.3% to
1,020 as of September 30, 2009.
Floor
brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees increased
$3.7 million, or 17.4% to $24.7 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 from the nine months ended
September 30, 2008, primarily due to industry rebates
received in the prior year period that were not received in the
current period due to changes in the timing in which rebates are
received. These expenses also reflected increased fees due to
higher options volumes, offset in part by lower equity and
futures volumes.
Communication
and data processing
Total expenses for our communication and data processing
requirements increased $4.8 million, or 16.6%, to
$33.9 million from the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This
increase reflects costs associated with additional data
processing capacity resulting from a move to SunGards
latest generation system consisting of equipment dedicated to
our U.S. clearing business.
Occupancy
and equipment
Total expenses for occupancy and equipment decreased
$.1 million, or .4%, to $22.0 million from the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to costs
associated with our occupancy leases.
Other
expenses
Other expenses decreased $3.3 million, or 11.7%, to
$24.5 million from the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The
decrease relates to a $2.4 million litigation reserve
recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and lower
travel expenses, offset in part by increases in legal and
consulting fees.
29
Table of Contents
Interest
expense on long-term debt
Interest expense on long-term debt increased from
$3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 to $6.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as a result of additional interest
expense of approximately $2.5 million associated with our
senior convertible notes issued on June 3, 2009 and higher
interest expense on our revolving credit facility due to higher
interest rates.
Provision
for income taxes
Income tax expense, based on an effective income tax rate of
approximately 38.4%, was $7.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to an effective tax
rate of 37.9% and income tax expense of $13.1 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is
primarily attributed to decreased operating profit in the
current period offset by a higher effective tax rate. The higher
effective rate is primarily attributable to permanent
differences encompassing a higher percentage of pretax income in
the current period as compared to the prior period due to lower
pretax earnings.
Net
income
As a result of the foregoing, net income decreased to
$11.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 from $21.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Liquidity
and capital resources
Operating Liquidity Our clearing
broker-dealer subsidiaries typically finance their operating
liquidity needs through secured bank lines of credit and through
secured borrowings from stock lending counterparties in the
securities business, which we refer to as stock
loans. Most of our borrowings are driven by the activities
of our clients or correspondents, primarily the purchase of
securities on margin by those parties. As of September 30,
2009, we had seven uncommitted lines of credit with seven
financial institutions for the purpose of facilitating our
clearing business as well as the activities of our customers and
correspondents. Five of these lines of credit permitted us to
borrow up to an aggregate of approximately $308.5 million
while two lines had no stated limit. As of September 30,
2009, we had approximately $363.4 million in short-term
bank loans outstanding, which left approximately
$154.8 million available under our lines of credit with
stated limitations.
As noted above, our businesses that are clearing brokers also
have the ability to borrow through stock loan arrangements.
There are no specific limitations on our borrowing capacities
pursuant to our stock loan arrangements. Borrowings under these
arrangements bear interest at variable rates, are secured
primarily by our firm inventory or customers margin
account securities, and are repayable on demand. At
September 30, 2009, we had approximately
$234.4 million in borrowings under stock loan arrangements.
As a result of our customers and correspondents
aforementioned activities, our operating cash flows may vary
from year to year.
Capital Resources PWI provides capital to all
of our subsidiaries. PWI has the ability to obtain capital
through equipment leases and through a $100.0 million line
of credit under a secured credit facility. Equipment purchased
under capital leases is typically secured by the equipment
itself. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had
$70.0 million outstanding on this line of credit that
expires in April 2010. On June 3, 2009, the Company issued
$60 million aggregate principal amount of 8.00% Senior
Convertible Notes due 2014. The net proceeds from the sale of
the convertible notes were approximately $56.2 after initial
purchaser discounts and other expenses.
As a holding company, we access the earnings of our operating
subsidiaries through the receipt of dividends from these
subsidiaries. Some of our subsidiaries are subject to the
requirements of securities regulators in their respective
countries relating to liquidity and capital standards, which may
serve to limit funds available for the payment of dividends to
the holding company.
Our principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary, PFSI, is
subject to the SEC Uniform Net Capital Rule
(Rule 15c3-1),
which requires the maintenance of a minimum net capital. PFSI
elected to use the alternative method, permitted by
Rule 15c3-1,
which requires PFSI to maintain minimum net capital, as defined,
equal to the
30
Table of Contents
greater of $250,000 or 2% of aggregate debit balances, as
defined in the SECs Reserve Requirement Rule
(Rule 15c3-3).
At September 30, 2009, PFSI had net capital of
$97.0 million, which was $74.4 million in excess of
its required net capital of $22.6 million.
Our Penson GHCO, PFSL, PFSC and Penson Australia subsidiaries
are also subject to minimum financial and capital requirements.
These requirements are not material either individually or
collectively to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements as of September 30, 2009. All
subsidiaries were in compliance with their minimum financial and
capital requirements as of September 30, 2009.
Contractual
obligations and commitments
We have contractual obligations to make future payments under
long-term debt and long-term non-cancelable lease agreements and
have contingent commitments under a variety of commercial
arrangements. See Note 12 to our unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements for further
information regarding our commitments and contingencies.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or
financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as
structured finance or special purpose entities, which are
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
See Note 10 to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements for information on off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Critical
accounting policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based on our unaudited interim
condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements requires us
to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We review our
estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on our
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to
be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ
from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
While our significant accounting policies are described in more
detail in the notes to consolidated financial statements, we
believe the accounting policies that require management to make
assumptions and estimates involving significant judgment are
those relating to revenue recognition, fair value, software
development and the valuation of stock-based compensation.
Revenue
recognition
Revenues from clearing transactions are recorded in the
Companys unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements on a trade date basis. Cash received in
advance of revenue recognition is recorded as deferred revenue.
There are three major types of technology revenues:
(1) completed products that are processing transactions
every month generate revenues per transaction which are
recognized on a trade date basis; (2) these same completed
products may also generate monthly terminal charges for the
delivery of data or processing capability that are recognized in
the month to which the charges apply; (3) technology
development services are recognized when the service is
performed or under the terms of the technology development
contract as described below. Interest and other revenues are
recorded in the month that they are earned.
To date, the majority of our technology development contracts
have not required significant production, modification or
customization such that the service element of our overall
relationship with the client generally does meet the criteria
for separate accounting under the FASB Codification. All of our
products are fully functional when initially delivered to our
clients, and any additional technology development work that is
contracted for is as outlined below. Technology development
contracts generally cover only additional work that is performed
to modify existing products to meet the specific needs of
individual customers. This work can range from cosmetic
modifications to the customer interface (private labeling) to
custom development of additional features requested
31
Table of Contents
by the client. Technology revenues arising from development
contracts are recorded on a
percentage-of-completion
basis based on outputs unless there are significant
uncertainties preventing the use of this approach in which case
a completed contract basis is used. The Companys revenue
recognition policy is consistent with applicable revenue
recognition guidance in the FASB Codification and Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition
(SAB 104).
Fair
value
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The Companys financial assets and liabilities are
primarily recorded at fair value.
In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation
approaches, including market, income
and/or cost
approaches. The fair value model establishes a hierarchy which
prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure
fair value. This hierarchy increases the consistency and
comparability of fair value measurements and related disclosures
by maximizing the use of observable inputs and minimizing the
use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs
be used when available. Observable inputs reflect the
assumptions market participants would use in pricing the assets
or liabilities based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the
Companys own assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three
broad levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:
| Level 1 Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include corporate equity, U.S. Treasury and money market securities. Valuation of these instruments does not require a high degree of judgment as the valuations are based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly available. | |
| Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable as of the measurement date, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include certificates of deposit, term deposits, corporate debt securities and Canadian government obligations. These financial instruments are valued by quoted prices that are less frequent than those in active markets or by models that use various assumptions that are derived from or supported by data that is generally observable in the marketplace. Valuations in this category are inherently less reliable than quoted market prices due to the degree of subjectivity involved in determining appropriate methodologies and the applicable underlying assumptions. | |
| Level 3 Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and not corroborated by market data. The Company does not currently have any financial instruments utilizing Level 3 inputs. These financial instruments have significant inputs that cannot be validated by readily determinable data and generally involve considerable judgment by management. |
See Note 4 to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial statements for a description of the financial assets
carried at fair value.
Software
development
Costs associated with software developed for internal use are
capitalized based on the applicable guidance in the FASB
Codification Capitalized costs include external direct costs of
materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining
internal-use software and payroll for employees directly
associated with, and who devote time to, the development of the
internal-use software. Costs incurred in development and
enhancement of software that do not meet the capitalization
criteria, such as costs of activities performed during the
preliminary and post- implementation stages, are expensed as
incurred. Costs incurred in development and enhancements that do
not meet
32
Table of Contents
the criteria to capitalize are activities performed during the
application development stage such as designing, coding,
installing and testing. The critical estimate related to this
process is the determination of the amount of time devoted by
employees to specific stages of internal-use software
development projects. We review any impairment of the
capitalized costs on a periodic basis.
Stock-based
compensation
The Companys accounting for stock-based employee
compensation plans focuses primarily on accounting for
transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments
for employee services, and carries forward prior guidance for
share-based payments for transactions with non-employees. Under
the modified prospective transition method, the Company is
required to recognize compensation cost, after the effective
date, for the portion of all previously granted awards that were
not vested, and the vested portion of all new stock option
grants and restricted stock. The compensation cost is based upon
the original grant-date fair market value of the grant. The
Company recognizes expense relating to stock-based compensation
on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period which
is generally the vesting period. Forfeitures of unvested stock
grants are estimated and recognized as reduction of expense.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that may not be
based on current or historical fact. Though we believe our
expectations to be accurate, forward-looking statements are
subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by such statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include but are not limited to:
| interest rate fluctuations; | |
| general economic conditions and the effect of economic conditions on consumer confidence; | |
| reduced margin loan balances maintained by our customers; | |
| fluctuations in overall market trading volume; | |
| our inability to successfully implement new product offerings; | |
| reductions in per transaction clearing fees; | |
| legislative and regulatory changes; | |
| our ability to attract and retain customers and key personnel; and | |
| those risks detailed from time to time in our press releases and periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Additional important factors that may cause our actual results
to differ from our projections are detailed later in this report
under the section entitled Risk Factors. You should
not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by
law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement.
Item 3. | Quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk |
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2007, we did not have material
exposure to reductions in the targeted federal funds rate.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007 there were significant
decreases in these rates. We encountered a 50 basis point
decrease in the federal funds rate in the fourth quarter of
2007. Actual rates fell approximately 400 basis points
during 2008, to a federal funds rate of approximately .25% as of
December 31, 2008, which is the current rate as of
September 30, 2009. Based upon the September quarter
average customer balances, assuming no increase, and adjusting
for the timing of these rate reductions, we believe that each
25 basis point increase or decrease will affect pretax
income by approximately $1 million per quarter. Despite
such interest rate changes, we do not have material exposure to
commodity price changes or similar market risks. Accordingly, we
have not
33
Table of Contents
entered into any derivative contracts to mitigate such risk. In
addition, we do not maintain material inventories of securities
for sale, and therefore are not subject to equity price risk.
We extend margin credit and leverage to our correspondents and
their customers, which is subject to various regulatory and
clearing firm margin requirements. Margin credit is
collateralized by cash and securities in the customers
accounts. Our directors and executive officers and their
associates, including family members, from time to time may be
or may have been indebted to one or more of our operating
subsidiaries or one of their respective correspondents or
introducing brokers, as customers, in connection with margin
account loans. Such indebtedness is in the ordinary course of
business, is on substantially the same terms, including interest
rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with unaffiliated third parties who are
not our employees and does not involve a more than normal risk
of collectability or present other unfavorable features.
Leverage involves securing a large potential future obligation
with a proportional amount of cash or securities. The risks
associated with margin credit and leverage increase during
periods of fast market movements or in cases where leverage or
collateral is concentrated and market movements occur. During
such times, customers who utilize margin credit or leverage and
who have collateralized their obligations with securities may
find that the securities have a rapidly depreciating value and
may not be sufficient to cover their obligations in the event of
liquidation.
We are also exposed to credit risk when our correspondents
customers execute transactions, such as short sales of options
and equities, which can expose them to risk beyond their
invested capital. We are indemnified and held harmless by our
correspondents from certain liabilities or claims, the use of
margin credit, leverage and short sales of their customers.
However, if our correspondents do not have sufficient regulatory
capital to cover such problems, we may be exposed to significant
off-balance sheet risk in the event that collateral requirements
are not sufficient to fully cover losses that customers may
incur and those customers and their correspondents fail to
satisfy their obligations. Our account level margin credit and
leverage requirements meet or exceed those required by
Regulation T of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve, or similar regulatory requirements in other
jurisdictions. The SEC and other self-regulated organizations
(SROs) have approved new rules permitting portfolio
margining that have the effect of permitting increased leverage
on securities held in portfolio margin accounts relative to
non-portfolio accounts. We began offering portfolio margining to
our clients in 2007. We intend to continue to meet or exceed any
account level margin credit and leverage requirements mandated
by the SEC, other SROs, or similar regulatory requirements in
other jurisdictions as we expand the offering of portfolio
margining to our clients.
The profitability of our margin lending activities depends to a
great extent on the difference between interest income earned on
margin loans and investments of customer cash and the interest
expense paid on customer cash balances and borrowings. If
short-term interest rates fall, we generally expect to receive a
smaller gross interest spread, causing the profitability of our
margin lending and other interest-sensitive revenue sources to
decline. Short-term interest rates are highly sensitive to
factors that are beyond our control, including general economic
conditions and the policies of various governmental and
regulatory authorities. In particular, decreases in the federal
funds rate by the Federal Reserve System usually lead to
decreasing interest rates in the U.S., which generally lead to a
decrease in the gross spread we earn. This is most significant
when the federal funds rate is on the low end of its historical
range, as is the case now. Interest rates in Canada and Europe
are also subject to fluctuations based on governmental policies
and economic factors and these fluctuations could also affect
the profitability of our margin lending operations in these
markets.
Given the volatility of exchange rates, we may not be able to
manage our currency transaction
and/or
translation risks effectively, or volatility in currency
exchange rates may expose our financial condition or results of
operations to a significant additional risk.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.
Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no changes in our internal controls or in other
factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
34
Table of Contents
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc. is a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy case filed on August 17, 2007 in
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
Illinois by Sentinel Management Group, Inc., a registered
futures commission merchant (Sentinel). Prior to the
filing of this action, Penson GHCO and PFFI held customer
segregated accounts with Sentinel totaling approximately
$36 million. Sentinel subsequently sold certain securities
to Citadel Equity Fund, Ltd. and Citadel Limited Partnership. On
August 20, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court authorized
distributions of 95 percent of the proceeds Sentinel
received from the sale of those securities to certain FCM
clients of Sentinel, including Penson GHCO. This distribution to
the Penson GHCO and PFFI customer segregated accounts along with
a distribution received immediately prior to the bankruptcy
filing totaled approximately $25.4 million.
On May 12, 2008, a committee of Sentinel creditors,
consisting of a majority of non-FCM creditors, together with the
trustee appointed to manage the affairs and liquidation of
Sentinel (the Sentinel Trustee), filed with the
Court their proposed Plan of Liquidation (the Committee
Plan) and on May 13, 2008 filed a Disclosure
Statement related thereto. The Committee Plan allows the
Sentinel Trustee to seek the return from FCMs, including Penson
GHCO and PFFI, of a portion of the funds previously distributed
to their customer segregated accounts. On June 19, 2008,
the Court entered an order approving the Disclosure Statement
over objections by Penson GHCO and others. On September 16,
2008, the Sentinel Trustee filed suit against Penson GHCO and
PFFI along with several other FCMs that received distributions
to their customer segregated accounts from Sentinel. The suit
against Penson GHCO and PFFI seeks the return of approximately
$23.6 million of post-bankruptcy petition transfers and
$14.4 million of pre-bankruptcy petition transfers. The
suit also seeks to declare that the funds distributed to the
customer segregated accounts of Penson GHCO and PFFI by Sentinel
are the property of the Sentinel bankruptcy estate rather than
the property of customers of Penson GHCO and PFFI.
On December 15, 2008, over the objections of Penson GHCO
and PFFI, the court entered an order confirming the Committee
Plan, and the Committee Plan became effective on
December 17, 2008. On January 7, 2009 Penson GHCO and
PFFI filed their answer and affirmative defenses to the suit
brought by the Sentinel Trustee. Also on January 7, 2009,
Penson GHCO, PFFI and a number of other FCMs that had placed
customer funds with Sentinel filed motions to withdraw the
reference with the federal district court for the Northern
District of Illinois, effectively asking the federal district
court to remove the Sentinel suits against the FCMs from the
bankruptcy court and consolidate them with other Sentinel
related actions pending in the federal district court. On
April 8, 2009, the Sentinel Trustee filed an amended
complaint, which added a claim for unjust enrichment. Penson
GHCO and PFFIs response seeking to dismiss this claim was
filed on May 8, 2009. On June 30, 2009, the Court
denied the motion to dismiss without prejudice. The Court also
held a preliminary pretrial hearing on June 30, 2009, and
ordered that the first trial of the Sentinel Trustees
claims against one FCM would commence on July 6, 2010, and
the thirteen remaining trials would be scheduled at one month
intervals thereafter. The trial of the Sentinel Trustees
claims against Penson GHCO and PFFI is tentatively scheduled to
proceed from September
20-23, 2010.
On July 31, 2009, Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their motion
for reconsideration of the Courts order denying their
motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim. On
September 1, 2009, the Court denied the motion for
reconsideration without prejudice. On September 11, 2009,
Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their amended answer and amended
affirmative defenses to the Sentinel Trustees amended
complaint. On October 28, 2009, the federal district court
for the Northern District of Illinois granted Penson GHCO, PFFI,
and certain other FCMs motions requesting removal of the
matters referenced above from the bankruptcy court, thereby
removing these matters to the federal district court. While the
trial schedule referenced above is still pending, it may change
given the granting of the motions removing these matters to the
federal district court.
The Company believes that the Court was correct in ordering the
prior distributions and Penson GHCO and PFFI intend to continue
to vigorously defend their position. However, there can be no
assurance that any actions by Penson GHCO or PFFI will result in
a limitation or avoidance of potential repayment liabilities. In
the event that Penson GHCO and PFFI are obligated to return all
previously distributed funds to the Sentinel Estate, any losses
the
35
Table of Contents
Company might suffer would most likely be partially mitigated as
it is likely that Penson GHCO and PFFI would share in the funds
ultimately disbursed by the Sentinel Estate.
Various Claimants v. Penson Financial Services, Inc.,
et al. On July 18, 2006, three claimants filed
separate arbitration claims with the NASD (which is now known as
FINRA) against PFSI related to the sale of certain
collateralized mortgage obligations by SAMCO Financial Services,
Inc. (SAMCO Financial), a former correspondent of
PFSI, to its customers. In the ensuing months, additional
arbitration claims were filed against PFSI and certain of our
directors and officers based upon substantially similar
underlying facts. These claims generally allege, among other
things, that SAMCO Financial, in its capacity as broker, and
PFSI, in its capacity as the clearing broker, failed to
adequately supervise certain registered representatives of SAMCO
Financial, and otherwise acted improperly in connection with the
sale of these securities during the time period from
approximately June 2004 to May 2006. Claimants have generally
requested compensation for losses incurred through the
depreciation in market value or liquidation of the
collateralized mortgage obligations, interest on any losses
suffered, punitive damages, court costs and attorneys
fees. In addition to the arbitration claims, on March 21,
2008, Ward Insurance Company, Inc., et al, filed a claim against
PFSI and Roger J. Engemoen, Jr., the Companys
Chairman of the Board, in the Superior Court of California,
County of San Diego, Central District, based upon
substantially similar facts. This case was filed after a FINRA
arbitration panel had previously ruled against the claimant on
substantially similar facts, but in that action, PFSI and
Mr. Engemoen were not parties. Among other defenses
asserted, the Company is seeking to have the court enforce the
earlier arbitration panel determination.
Mr. Engemoen, the Companys Chairman of the Board, is
the Chairman of the Board, and beneficially owns approximately
49% of the outstanding stock, of SAMCO Holdings, Inc., the
holding company of SAMCO Financial and SAMCO Capital Markets,
Inc. (SAMCO Holdings, Inc. and its affiliated companies are
referred to as the SAMCO Entities). Certain of the
SAMCO Entities received certain assets from the Company when
those assets were split-off immediately prior to the
Companys initial public offering in 2006 (the
Split-Off). In connection with the Split-Off and
through contractual and other arrangements, certain of the SAMCO
Entities have agreed to indemnify the Company and its affiliates
against liabilities that were incurred by any of the SAMCO
Entities in connection with the operation of their businesses,
either prior to or following the Split-Off. During the third
quarter of 2008, the Companys management determined that,
based on the financial condition of the SAMCO Entities,
sufficient risk existed with respect to the indemnification
protections to warrant a modification of these arrangements with
the SAMCO Entities, as described below.
On November 5, 2008, the Company entered into a settlement
agreement with certain of the SAMCO Entities pursuant to which
the Company received a limited personal guaranty from
Mr. Engemoen of certain of the indemnification obligations
of various SAMCO Entities with respect to claims related to the
underlying facts described above, and, in exchange, the Company
agreed to limit the aggregate indemnification obligations of the
SAMCO Entities with respect to certain matters described above
to $2,965,243. Unpaid indemnification obligations of $800,000
were satisfied prior to February 15, 2009. Of the $800,000
obligation, $86,000 was satisfied through a setoff against an
obligation owed to the SAMCO Entities by PFSI, with the balance
paid in cash. Of the remaining $2,165,243 indemnity obligation,
$600,000 was paid to the Company prior to June 15, 2009 and
the remainder is to be paid no later than December 31,
2009. Mr. Engemoen has guaranteed the payment of these
obligations up to an aggregate of $2.0 million, within
thirty (30) days of any default by the SAMCO Entities of
their obligations under the settlement agreement. In addition to
the above stated liabilities, the SAMCO Entities will also be
responsible for any costs associated with collection under the
foregoing settlement agreement together with any interest
accrued on any past due amounts, and Mr. Engemoen will be
responsible for any additional costs associated with collection
under his guaranty together with any interest accrued on any
past due amounts. The SAMCO Entities will remain responsible for
the payment of their own defense costs and any claims from any
third parties not expressly released under the settlement
agreement, irrespective of amounts paid to indemnify the
Company. The settlement agreement only relates to the matters
described above and does not alter the indemnification
obligations of the SAMCO Entities with respect to unrelated
matters.
In the event the exposure of the Company with respect to these
claims exceeds the agreed limits on the indemnification
obligations of the SAMCO Entities and the guaranty of
Mr. Engemoen, such excess amounts may be borne by the
Company. While we believe we have good defenses, there can be no
assurance that our defenses and indemnification protections will
be sufficient to avoid all liabilities. Accordingly, to account
for liabilities related to
36
Table of Contents
the aforementioned claims that may be borne by the Company, we
recorded a pre-tax charge of $2.35 million in the third
quarter of 2008. The Company will continue to monitor its
financial exposure with respect to these matters and there can
be no assurance that the Companys ultimate costs with
respect to these claims will not exceed the amount of this
reserve.
In the general course of business, the Company and certain of
its officers have been named as defendants in other various
pending lawsuits and arbitration and regulatory proceedings.
These other claims allege violation of federal and state
securities laws, among other matters. The Company believes that
resolution of these claims will not result in any material
adverse effect on its business, financial condition, or results
of operation.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Recent
market instability could negatively affect our operations and
financial condition.
As a financial services provider, our business is sensitive to
conditions in the global financial markets and economic
conditions generally, as well as to the soundness of particular
financial services institutions with which we transact business.
Among other things, national and international markets have
continued through the third quarter of 2009 to suffer
significant turmoil caused by a sharp downturn in markets for
mortgage-related securities and non-investment grade debt
securities and loans. Several large financial institutions
including, without limitation, commercial banks, insurance
companies, and brokerage firms, have either filed for bankruptcy
or been the subject of governmental intervention in the form of
loans, equity infusions or direct government ownership in
receivership. Others have been sold in whole or in part to third
parties. Financial services institutions that deal with each
other are often interrelated as a result of trading, clearing,
counterparty, or other relationships. As a result, a default or
failure by, or even concerns about the stability or liquidity
of, one or more financial services institutions could lead to
significant market-wide liquidity problems, or losses or
defaults by other institutions, including us. In addition, our
operations may suffer to the extent that ongoing market
volatility causes individuals and institutional traders and
other market participants to curtail or forego trading
activities, which could adversely affect our operations and
financial conditions.
Our
inability to obtain credit on favorable terms could
significantly restrict our business activities
Our $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility
is currently scheduled to expire in April 2010. There is no
guarantee that we will be able to renew or amend this credit
facility, obtain a new senior secured credit facility or
otherwise obtain credit from an alternative source on favorable
terms. Failure to renew or amend our existing credit facility or
obtain suitable alternative funding may significantly curtail
our business activities, which will have a materially adverse
effect on our financial condition.
Covenants
in our credit agreement will restrict our business
Our senior secured revolving credit facility includes various
covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of
transactions. These covenants limit our ability to, among other
things: incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on our
capital stock or redeem, repurchase or retire our capital stock
or prepay certain indebtedness, make investments, make capital
expenditures, engage in certain transactions with our
affiliates, enter into acquisitions, consolidate, merge or sell
assets, incur liens and change the business conducted by us and
our subsidiaries.
In addition, although we have recently amended our senior
secured revolving credit facility to provide more flexibility
with respect to certain covenants, the facility contains
covenants that require us to maintain specified financial ratios
and satisfy other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet
those financial ratios and tests can be affected by events
beyond our control, and we may not be able to meet those tests
at all. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a
default under such credit facility. Upon the occurrence of an
event of default under such senior secured revolving credit
facility, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts
outstanding under such credit facility to be immediately due and
payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit.
If the lenders under our senior secured revolving credit
facility accelerated the repayment of borrowings, we may not
have sufficient assets to repay the amounts outstanding
thereunder which could have a material adverse effect on us.
37
Table of Contents
In addition to the other information set forth in this report
and the risk factors discussed above, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed under the heading Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed on March 16, 2009, which could materially affect our
business operations, financial condition or future results.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or
that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially
adversely affect our business operations
and/or
financial condition.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
On December 6, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized us
to purchase up to $12.5 million of our common stock in open
market purchases and privately negotiated transactions. The plan
is set to expire after $12.5 million of our common stock is
purchased. No shares were repurchased under this plan in the
third quarter of 2009. The following table sets forth the
repurchases we made during the three months ended
September 30, 2009:
Total Number of |
||||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased as |
Maximum Number of |
|||||||||||||||
Average Price |
Part of Publicly |
Shares that May Yet be |
||||||||||||||
Total Number of |
Paid |
Announced Plans or |
Purchased under the |
|||||||||||||
Period
|
Shares Repurchased(a) | per Share | Program | Plans or Programs(b) | ||||||||||||
July
|
10,272 | $ | 9.12 | | 514,106 | |||||||||||
August
|
6,880 | 10.14 | | 462,392 | ||||||||||||
September
|
1,948 | 9.90 | | 473,601 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
19,100 | $ | 9.57 | | ||||||||||||
(a) | Includes shares withheld to cover tax-withholding requirements relating to the vesting of restricted stock units issued to employees pursuant to the Companys shareholder-approved stock incentive plan. | |
(b) | Remaining shares represent the remaining dollar amount authorized divided by the average purchase price in the month. |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None reportable
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None reportable
Item 5. | Other Information |
None reportable
38
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
Exhibit |
Method of |
|||||||
Numbers
|
Description
|
Filing
|
||||||
10 | .1 | Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated the | (1) | |||||
22nd day of September, 2009, by and among the Company, Regions Bank, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer, the lenders party thereto and the other parties thereto. | ||||||||
31 | .1 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our principal executive officer | (2) | |||||
31 | .2 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our principal financial officer | (2) | |||||
32 | .1 | Section 1350 Certification by our principal executive officer | (2) | |||||
32 | .2 | Section 1350 Certification by our principal financial officer | (2) |
(1) | Filed herewith. |
39
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
/s/ Philip
A. Pendergraft
|
Philip A. Pendergraft
Chief Executive Officer
and principal executive officer
Date: November 6, 2009
/s/ Kevin
W. McAleer
Kevin W. McAleer
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and principal financial and accounting officer
Date: November 6, 2009
40
Table of Contents
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
Exhibit |
Method of |
|||||||
Numbers
|
Description
|
Filing
|
||||||
10 | .1 | Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated the 22nd day of September, 2009, by and among the Company, Regions Bank, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer, the lenders party thereto and the other parties thereto. | (1) | |||||
31 | .1 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our principal executive officer | (2) | |||||
31 | .2 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our principal financial officer | (2) | |||||
32 | .1 | Section 1350 Certification by our principal executive officer | (2) | |||||
32 | .2 | Section 1350 Certification by our principal financial officer | (2) |
(1) | Filed herewith. |
41