Attached files

file filename
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INCd69995exv32w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INCd69995exv31w2.htm
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INCd69995exv10w1.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INCd69995exv32w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - PENSON WORLDWIDE INCd69995exv31w1.htm
Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
 
 
Form 10-Q
 
     
þ
  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     
    For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2009
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     
    For the transition period from          to
 
Commission file number. 001-32878
 
 
 
 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  75-2896356
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 1400
Dallas, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
  75201
(Zip Code)
 
(214) 765-1100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ
 
As of November 5, 2009, there were 25,457,258 shares of the registrant’s $.01 par value common stock outstanding.
 


 

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
 
                 
Item
       
Number
      Page
 
        PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION     2  
 
1
    Financial Statements (Unaudited):     2  
        Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008     2  
        Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008     3  
        Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009     4  
        Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008     5  
        Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements     6  
 
2
    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     22  
 
3
    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk     33  
 
4
    Controls and Procedures     34  
        PART II. OTHER INFORMATION     35  
 
1
    Legal Proceedings     35  
 
1A
    Risk Factors     37  
 
2
    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds     38  
 
3
    Defaults Upon Senior Securities     38  
 
4
    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     38  
 
5
    Other Information     38  
 
6
    Exhibits     39  
        Signatures     40  
 EX-10.1
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2


1


Table of Contents

 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.   Financial Statements
 
 
 
                 
    September 30,
    December 31,
 
    2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)        
    (In thousands,
 
    except par values)  
 
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 146,525     $ 38,825  
Cash and securities — segregated under federal and other regulations
    3,345,945       2,383,948  
Receivable from broker-dealers and clearing organizations (including securities at fair value of $2,649 at September 30, 2009 and $17,369 at December 31, 2008)
    435,864       318,278  
Receivable from customers, net
    1,418,348       687,194  
Receivable from correspondents
    109,344       135,092  
Securities borrowed
    1,299,345       964,080  
Securities owned, at fair value
    281,655       429,531  
Deposits with clearing organizations (including securities at fair value of $377,398 at September 30, 2009 and $290,316 at December 31, 2008)
    443,287       327,544  
Property and equipment, net
    34,776       28,428  
Other assets
    399,404       226,275  
                 
Total assets
  $ 7,914,493     $ 5,539,195  
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Payable to broker-dealers and clearing organizations
  $ 415,573     $ 345,094  
Payable to customers
    5,396,852       3,575,401  
Payable to correspondents
    276,120       161,422  
Short-term bank loans
    363,406       130,846  
Notes payable
    113,605       75,000  
Securities loaned
    885,120       842,034  
Securities sold, not yet purchased, at fair value
    71,245       48,383  
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities
    99,949       96,548  
                 
Total liabilities
    7,621,870       5,274,728  
                 
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
           
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized; 28,877 shares issued and 25,429 outstanding as of September 30, 2009; 28,604 shares issued and 25,207 outstanding as of December 31, 2008
    289       286  
Additional paid-in capital
    256,838       244,052  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    1,112       (3,025 )
Retained earnings
    88,141       76,471  
Treasury stock, at cost; 3,448 and 3,397 shares of common stock at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
    (53,757 )     (53,317 )
                 
Total stockholders’ equity
    292,623       264,467  
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 7,914,493     $ 5,539,195  
                 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


2


Table of Contents

 
                                 
    Three Months Ended
    Nine Months Ended
 
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
          (Unaudited)        
 
Revenues
                               
Clearing and commission fees
  $ 36,911     $ 40,215     $ 110,219     $ 114,076  
Technology
    6,266       6,190       18,383       16,089  
Interest, gross
    25,096       47,250       77,973       140,662  
Other
    12,551       11,267       35,837       32,344  
                                 
Total revenues
    80,824       104,922       242,412       303,171  
Interest expense from securities operations
    8,601       25,620       26,951       79,061  
                                 
Net revenues
    72,223       79,302       215,461       224,110  
                                 
Expenses
                               
Employee compensation and benefits
    27,204       28,197       85,321       86,497  
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
    8,544       8,568       24,719       21,063  
Communications and data processing
    11,745       10,274       33,870       29,041  
Occupancy and equipment
    7,422       7,810       22,032       22,125  
Other expenses
    7,652       11,507       24,533       27,795  
Interest expense on long-term debt
    3,480       885       6,041       3,047  
                                 
      66,047       67,241       196,516       189,568  
                                 
Income before income taxes
    6,176       12,061       18,945       34,542  
Income tax expense
    2,309       4,583       7,275       13,085  
                                 
Net income
  $ 3,867     $ 7,478     $ 11,670     $ 21,457  
                                 
Earnings per share — basic
  $ 0.15     $ 0.30     $ 0.46     $ 0.85  
                                 
Earnings per share — diluted
  $ 0.15     $ 0.29     $ 0.46     $ 0.84  
                                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic
    25,411       25,108       25,334       25,227  
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
    25,765       25,811       25,570       25,517  
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


3


Table of Contents

 
                                                                 
                                  Accumulated
             
                                  Other
          Total
 
    Preferred
    Common Stock     Additional paid-in
    Treasury
    Comprehensive
    Retained
    Stockholders’
 
    Stock     Shares     Amount     Capital     Stock     Income (Loss)     Earnings     Equity  
    (Unaudited)
 
    (In thousands)  
 
Balance, December 31, 2008
  $       25,207     $ 286     $ 244,052     $ (53,317 )   $ (3,025 )   $ 76,471     $ 264,467  
Net income
                                        11,670       11,670  
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $2,667
                                  4,137             4,137  
                                                                 
Comprehensive income
                                                            15,807  
Purchase of treasury stock
          (52 )                 (440 )                 (440 )
Stock-based compensation expense
          186       2       3,805                         3,807  
Excess tax deficiency from stock-based compensation plans
                      (389 )                       (389 )
Purchases of common stock under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan
          53       1       313                         314  
Issuance of common stock
          35             235                         235  
Equity component of the conversion feature attributable to senior convertible notes, net of tax of $5,593
                      8,822                         8,822  
                                                                 
Balance, September 30, 2009
  $       25,429     $ 289     $ 256,838     $ (53,757 )   $ 1,112     $ 88,141     $ 292,623  
                                                                 
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


4


Table of Contents

 
                 
    Nine Months Ended
 
    September 30,  
    2009     2008  
    (Unaudited)
 
    (In thousands)  
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 11,670     $ 21,457  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    14,657       15,243  
Stock-based compensation
    3,807       3,211  
Debt discount accretion
    869        
Changes in operating assets and liabilities exclusive of effects of business combinations:
               
Cash and securities — segregated under federal and other regulations
    (938,905 )     (865,142 )
Net receivable/payable with customers
    1,040,548       921,538  
Net receivable/payable with correspondents
    133,447       (320,979 )
Securities borrowed
    (325,022 )     586,049  
Securities owned
    175,559       (35,685 )
Deposits with clearing organizations
    (114,688 )     12,749  
Other assets
    (141,086 )     82,458  
Net receivable/payable with broker-dealers and clearing organizations
    (51,220 )     42,536  
Securities loaned
    42,581       (477,569 )
Securities sold, not yet purchased
    15,926       (12,944 )
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities
    (1,385 )     40,932  
                 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    (133,242 )     13,854  
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Business combinations, net of cash acquired
    (21,653 )     (27,312 )
Purchase of property and equipment
    (17,833 )     (13,614 )
                 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (39,486 )     (40,926 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Net proceeds from issuance of convertible notes
    56,200        
Proceeds from revolving credit facility
    20,000       20,000  
Repayments of revolving credit facility
    (25,000 )      
Net borrowing (repayments) on short-term bank loans
    226,387       (32,945 )
Exercise of stock options
          168  
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation plans
    19       132  
Purchase of treasury stock
    (440 )     (7,270 )
Issuance of common stock
    314       684  
                 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    277,480       (19,231 )
                 
Effect of exchange rates on cash
    2,948       (4,643 )
                 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    107,700       (50,946 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    38,825       120,923  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 146,525     $ 69,977  
                 
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
               
Interest payments
  $ 6,676     $ 15,441  
Income tax payments
  $ 2,547     $ 13,755  
 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


5


Table of Contents

 
1.   Basis of Presentation
 
Organization and Business — Penson Worldwide, Inc. (“PWI” or the “Company”) is a holding company incorporated in Delaware. The Company conducts business through its wholly owned subsidiary SAI Holdings, Inc. (“SAI”). SAI conducts business through its principal direct and indirect operating subsidiaries, Penson Financial Services, Inc. (“PFSI”), Penson Financial Services Canada Inc. (“PFSC”), Penson Financial Services Ltd. (“PFSL”), Nexa Technologies, Inc. (“Nexa”), Penson GHCO (“Penson GHCO”), Penson Asia Limited (“Penson Asia”) and Penson Financial Services Australia Pty Ltd (“Penson Australia”). Through these operating subsidiaries, the Company provides securities and futures clearing services including integrated trade execution, clearing and custody services, trade settlement, technology services, risk management services, customer account processing and customized data processing services. The Company also participates in margin lending and securities lending and borrowing transactions, primarily to facilitate clearing and financing activities.
 
PFSI is a broker-dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), a member of the New York Stock Exchange and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), and is licensed to do business in all fifty states of the United States of America. PFSC is an investment dealer and is subject to the rules and regulations of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada. PFSL provides settlement services to the London financial community and is regulated by the Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) and is a member of the London Stock Exchange. Penson GHCO is a registered Futures Commission Merchant (“FCM”) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”), various futures exchanges and is regulated in the United Kingdom by the FSA. Penson Australia holds an Australian Financial Services License and is a market participant of the Australian Securities Exchange and a clearing participant of the Australian Clearing House.
 
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PWI and its wholly-owned subsidiary SAI. SAI’s subsidiaries include among others, PFSI, Nexa, Penson Execution Services, Inc., GHP1, Inc. (“GHP1”), which includes its direct and indirect subsidiaries GHP2, LLC (“GHP2”), First Capitol Group, LLC (“FCG”) and Penson GHCO and Penson Holdings, Inc. (“PHI”), which includes its subsidiaries PFSC, PFSL, Penson Asia and Penson Australia. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 contained in this Quarterly Report (collectively, the “unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements”) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for all periods presented.
 
In the opinion of management, the unaudited accompanying condensed consolidated statements of financial condition and related interim statements of income, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted in accordance with rules and regulations of the SEC. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Penson Worldwide, Inc. consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the SEC on Form 10-K. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
 
In connection with the delivery of products and services to its clients and customers, the Company manages its revenues and related expenses in the aggregate. As such, the Company evaluates the performance of its business activities and evaluates clearing and commission, technology, and interest income along with the associated interest expense as one integrated activity.


6


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
The Company’s cost infrastructure supporting its business activities varies by activity. In some instances, these costs are directly attributable to one business activity and sometimes to multiple activities. As such, in assessing the performance of its business activities, the Company does not consider these costs separately, but instead, evaluates performance in the aggregate along with the related revenues. Therefore, the Company’s pricing considers both the direct and indirect costs associated with transactions related to each business activity, the client relationship and the demand for the particular product or service in the marketplace. As a result, the Company does not manage or capture the costs associated with the products or services sold, or its general and administrative costs by revenue line.
 
Management’s Estimates and Assumptions — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company reviews all significant estimates affecting the financial statements on a recurring basis and records the effect of any necessary adjustments prior to their issuance.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”), the single source of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards and was effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2009. The FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates. The FASB will not consider Accounting Standards Updates as authoritative in their own right; these updates will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance, and provide the bases for conclusions on the changes in the Codification.
 
In May 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for convertible debt instruments. This guidance requires that entities with convertible debt instruments that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion should separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. The effect of the proposed new rules for the Company’s convertible debentures is that the equity component would be included in the paid-in-capital section of shareholders’ equity on an entity’s consolidated balance sheet and the value of the equity component would be treated as original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of convertible debt. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2009. See Note 9 for the impact on our consolidated condensed financial statements.
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative disclosure guidance for financial instruments. The guidance requires an entity to provide interim disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments and to include disclosures related to the methods and significant assumptions used in estimating those instruments. The Company adopted this guidance during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements.
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of transaction activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. Additionally, this guidance requires additional disclosures regarding fair value in interim and annual reports. The Company adopted this guidance during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements.
 
In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for subsequent events, which establishes standards on events that occur after the balance sheet date but prior to the issuance of the financial statements. This guidance


7


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
distinguishes events requiring recognition in the financial statements and those that may require disclosure in the financial statements. Furthermore, it requires disclosure of the date through which subsequent events were evaluated. The Company adopted this guidance during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through November 6, 2009, the date the consolidated condensed financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q were issued.
 
2.   Acquisitions
 
First Capitol Group, LLC
 
In November 2007, our subsidiary Penson GHCO acquired all of the assets of FCG, an FCM and a leading provider of technology products and services to futures traders, and assigned the purchased membership interest to GHP1 effective immediately thereafter. We closed the transaction in November, 2007 and paid approximately $9.4 million in cash, subject to a reconciliation to reported actual net income for the period ended November 30, 2008, as defined in the purchase agreement and approximately 150 shares of common stock valued at $2.2 million to the previous owners of FCG. In addition, the Company agreed to pay an annual earnout in cash for the two year period following the actual net income reconciliation, based on average net income, subject to certain adjustments including cost of capital, for the acquired business. The Company paid approximately $8.7 million related to the first year of the earnout period. The Company finalized the acquisition valuation during the third quarter of 2008 and recorded goodwill of approximately $4.0 million and intangibles of approximately $7.6 million. The financial results of FCG have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the November 30, 2007 acquisition date. On May 31, 2008, Penson GHCO acquired substantially all of the assets of FCG as part of an internal reorganization and consolidation of assets. FCG currently conducts business as a division of Penson GHCO.
 
Goldenberg Hehmeyer and Co.
 
In November 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the partnership interests of Chicago-based GHCO, a leading international futures clearing and execution firm. The Company closed the transaction on February 16, 2007 and paid $27.9 million, including cash and approximately 139 shares of common stock valued at $3.9 million to the previous owners of GHCO. In addition, the Company agreed to pay additional consideration in the form of an earnout over the next three years, in an amount equal to 25% of Penson GHCO’s pre-tax earnings, as defined in the purchase agreement executed with the previous owners of GHCO. The Company did not make an earnout payment related to the first and second years of the integrated Penson GHCO business. Goodwill of approximately $2.8 million and intangibles of approximately $1.0 million were recorded in connection with the acquisition. The assets and liabilities acquired as well as the financial results of Penson GHCO have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the February 16, 2007 acquisition date.
 
Acquisition of the clearing business of Schonfeld Securities, LLC
 
In November 2006, the Company acquired the clearing business of Schonfeld Securities LLC (“Schonfeld”), a New York based securities firm. The Company closed the transaction in November 2006 and in January 2007, the Company issued approximately 1.1 million shares of common stock valued at $28.3 million to the previous owners of Schonfeld as partial consideration for the assets acquired of which approximately $14.8 million was recorded as goodwill and $13.5 million as intangibles. In addition, the Company agreed to pay an annual earnout of stock and cash over a four year period that commenced on June 1, 2007, based on net income, as defined in the asset purchase agreement, for the acquired business. The Company successfully completed the conversion of the seven Schonfeld correspondents in the second quarter of 2007. A payment of approximately $26.6 million was paid in connection with the first year earnout that ended May 31, 2008 and approximately $14.9 million has been paid in connection with the second year of the year earnout that ended May 31, 2009. At September 30, 2009, a liability of approximately $15.5 million was accrued as a result of the second year of the earnout ended May 31, 2009


8


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
($10.5 million) and four months of the year three earnout ending May 31, 2010 ($5.0 million). This balance is included in other liabilities in the condensed consolidated statement of financial condition. The offset of this liability, goodwill, is included in other assets.
 
3.   Computation of earnings per share
 
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share computation. Common stock equivalents related to stock options are excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation if their effect would be anti-dilutive to earnings per share.
 
                                 
    Three Months Ended
    Nine Months Ended
 
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
 
Basic and diluted:
                               
Net income
  $ 3,867     $ 7,478     $ 11,670     $ 21,457  
                                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic
    25,411       25,108       25,334       25,227  
Incremental shares from outstanding stock options
    30       44       25       44  
Non-vested restricted stock
    129       30       90       17  
Shares issuable
    24       629       24       229  
Convertible debt
    171             97        
                                 
Weighted average common shares and common share equivalents — diluted
    25,765       25,811       25,570       25,517  
                                 
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 0.15     $ 0.30     $ 0.46     $ 0.85  
                                 
Diluted earnings per common share
  $ 0.15     $ 0.29     $ 0.46     $ 0.84  
                                 
 
At September 30, 2009 and 2008, stock options and restricted stock units totaling 1,043 and 1,093 were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
 
4.   Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches, including market, income and/or cost approaches. The fair value model establishes a hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy increases the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and related disclosures by maximizing the use of observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:
 
  •  Level 1 — Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation of these instruments does not require a high degree of judgment as the valuations are based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly available.
 
  •  Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable as of the measurement date, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets


9


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
  that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. These financial instruments are valued by quoted prices that are less frequent than those in active markets or by models that use various assumptions that are derived from or supported by data that is generally observable in the marketplace. Valuations in this category are inherently less reliable than quoted market prices due to the degree of subjectivity involved in determining appropriate methodologies and the applicable underlying assumptions.
 
  •  Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and not corroborated by market data. The Company does not currently have any financial instruments utilizing Level 3 inputs. These financial instruments have significant inputs that cannot be validated by readily determinable data and generally involve considerable judgment by management.
 
The following is a description of the valuation techniques applied to the Company’s major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
U.S. government and agency securities
 
U.S. government securities are valued using quoted market prices in active markets. Accordingly, U.S. government securities are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
U.S. agency securities consist of agency issued debt and are valued using quoted market prices. As such these securities are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
Canadian government obligations
 
Canadian government securities include both Canadian federal obligations and Canadian provincial obligations. These securities are valued using quoted market prices. These bonds are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as the price quotations are not always from active markets.
 
Corporate debt
 
Corporate bonds are generally valued using quoted market prices. Corporate bonds are generally classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as prices are not always from active markets.
 
Corporate equity
 
Corporate equity securities represent exchange-traded securities are generally valued based on quoted prices in active markets. These securities are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
Certificates of deposit and term deposits
 
The fair value of certificates of deposits and term deposits is estimated using third-party quotations. These deposits are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
Money market
 
Money market funds are generally valued based on quoted prices in active markets. These securities are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.


10


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
The following table summarizes by level within the fair value hierarchy “Receivable from broker-dealers and clearing organizations”, “Securities owned, at fair value”, “Deposits with clearing organizations” and “Securities sold, not yet purchased, at fair value” as of September 30, 2009.
 
                         
    Level 1     Level 2     Total  
 
Receivable from broker-dealers and clearing organizations
                       
U.S. government and agency securities
  $ 2,649     $     $ 2,649  
                         
    $ 2,649     $     $ 2,649  
                         
Securities owned
                       
Corporate equity
  $ 982     $     $ 982  
Corporate debt
          59,038       59,038  
Certificates of deposit and term deposits
          21,028       21,028  
U.S. government and agency securities
    56,767             56,767  
Canadian government obligations
          93,240       93,240  
Money market
    50,600             50,600  
                         
    $ 108,349     $ 173,306     $ 281,655  
                         
Deposits with clearing organizations
                       
U.S. government and agency securities
  $ 232,275     $     $ 232,275  
Money market
    145,123             145,123  
                         
    $ 377,398     $     $ 377,398  
                         
Securities sold, not yet purchased
                       
Corporate equity
  $ 969     $     $ 969  
Corporate debt
          45,684       45,684  
Canadian government obligations
          24,592       24,592  
                         
    $ 969     $ 70,276     $ 71,245  
                         
 
5.   Segregated assets
 
Cash and securities segregated under U.S. federal and other regulations totaled $3,345,945 at September 30, 2009. Cash and securities segregated under federal and other regulations by PFSI totaled $2,981,193 at September 30, 2009. Of this amount, $2,948,488 was segregated for the benefit of customers under Rule 15c3-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), against a requirement as of September 30, 2009 of $2,969,794. An additional deposit of $60,000 was made on October 2, 2009 as allowed by Rule 15c3-3. The remaining balance of $32,705 at the end of the period relates to the Company’s election to compute a reserve requirement for Proprietary Accounts of Introducing Broker-Dealers (“PAIB”) calculation, as defined, against a requirement as of September 30, 2009 of $14,243. The PAIB calculation is completed in order for each correspondent firm that uses the Company as its clearing broker-dealer to classify its assets held by the Company as allowable assets in the correspondent’s net capital calculation. In addition, $370,603, including cash of $134,144 was segregated for the benefit of customers by Penson GHCO pursuant to CFTC Rule 1.20 at September 30, 2009. Finally, $86,976 and $143,632 was segregated under similar Canadian and United Kingdom regulations, respectively. At December 31, 2008, $2,383,948 was segregated for the benefit of customers under Rule 15c3-3 of the Exchange Act and PAIB, and similar Canadian and United Kingdom regulations.


11


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
 
6.   Receivable from and payable to broker-dealers and clearing organizations
 
Amounts receivable from and payable to broker-dealers and clearing organizations consists of the following:
 
                 
    September 30,
    December 31,
 
    2009     2008  
 
Receivable:
               
Securities failed to deliver
  $ 108,988     $ 75,022  
Receivable from clearing organizations
    326,876       243,256  
                 
    $ 435,864     $ 318,278  
                 
Payable:
               
Securities failed to receive
  $ 165,159     $ 41,108  
Payable to clearing organizations
    250,414       303,986  
                 
    $ 415,573     $ 345,094  
                 
 
Receivables from broker-dealers and clearing organizations include amounts receivable for securities failed to deliver, amounts receivable from clearing organizations relating to open transactions, good-faith and margin deposits, and floor-brokerage receivables. Payables to broker-dealers and clearing organizations include amounts payable for securities failed to receive, amounts payable to clearing organizations on open transactions, and floor-brokerage payables. In addition, the net receivable or payable arising from unsettled trades are reflected in these categories.
 
7.   Securities owned and securities sold, not yet purchased
 
Securities owned and securities sold, not yet purchased consist of trading and investment securities at quoted market if available, or fair values as follows:
 
                 
    September 30,
    December 31,
 
    2009     2008  
 
Securities Owned:
               
Corporate equity and debt
  $ 60,020     $ 26,593  
Certificates of deposit and term deposits
    21,028       82,049  
U.S. government and agency securities
    56,767       63,261  
Canadian government obligations
    93,240       51,428  
Money market
    50,600       206,200  
                 
    $ 281,655     $ 429,531  
                 
Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased:
               
Corporate equity and debt
  $ 46,653     $ 19,139  
Certificates of deposit and term deposits
          9,658  
Canadian government obligations
    24,592       19,586  
                 
    $ 71,245     $ 48,383  
                 
 
8.   Short-term bank loans and stock loan
 
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $363,406 and $130,846, respectively in short-term bank loans outstanding under seven uncommitted lines of credit with seven financial institutions. Five of


12


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
these lines of credit permitted the Company to borrow up to an aggregate of approximately $308,522 while two lines do not have specified borrowing limits. The fair value of short-term bank loans approximates their carrying values.
 
The Company also has the ability to borrow under stock loan arrangements. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $234,369 and $319,801, respectively in borrowings and no specific limitations on additional borrowing capacities. Borrowings under these arrangements bear interest at variable rates, are secured primarily by our firm inventory and customers’ margin account securities, and are repayable on demand. The fair value of these borrowings approximates their carrying values. The remaining balance in securities loaned relates to the Company’s conduit stock loan business.
 
9.   Notes Payable
 
Revolving Credit Facility
 
On May 1, 2009 the Company signed a new secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions. The Credit Facility was subsequently amended on May 27, 2009 and September 22, 2009. The Credit Facility allows the Company to borrow up to a maximum $100,000 at a variable rate of interest (6.75% at September 30, 2009) with a term of 364 days. The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a guaranty from SAI and PHI, and a pledge by the Company, SAI and PHI of the equity interests of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Credit Facility contains various positive and negative covenants, including certain financial covenants such as maintenance of minimum consolidated tangible net worth, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, a minimum capital requirement, a minimum liquidity requirement and maximum capital expenditures. As of September 30, 2009 $70,000 was outstanding. The fair value of the Credit Facility approximates its carrying value. Subsequent to September 30, 2009, the Company amended the Credit Facility that among other things, resulted in modified financial covenants. See Note 18.
 
Senior Convertible Notes
 
On June 3, 2009, the Company issued $60,000 aggregate principal amount of 8.00% Senior Convertible Notes due 2014 (the “Convertible Notes”). The $60,000 aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes includes $10,000 issued in connection with the exercise in full by the initial purchasers of their over-allotment option. The net proceeds from the sale of the convertible notes were approximately $56,200 after initial purchaser discounts and other expenses.
 
The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 8.0% per year. Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning December 1, 2009. The Convertible Notes will mature on June 1, 2014, subject to earlier repurchase or conversion.
 
Holders may convert their Convertible Notes at their option at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date for such Convertible Notes under the following circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter after the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2009 (and only during such fiscal quarter), if the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter is equal to or more than 120% of the conversion price of the Convertible Notes on the last day of such preceding fiscal quarter; (2) during the five business-day period after any five consecutive trading-day period in which the trading price per $1,000 (in whole dollars) principal amount of the Convertible Notes for each day of that period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock and the conversion rate of the Convertible Notes on each such day; (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions, including upon certain distributions to holders of the Company’s common stock and certain fundamental changes, including changes of control and dispositions of substantially all of the Company’s assets; and (4) at any time beginning on March 1, 2014. Upon conversion, the Company will pay or deliver, at the Company’s option, cash, shares of the


13


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
Company’s common stock or a combination thereof. The initial conversion rate for the Convertible Notes will be 101.9420 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 (in whole dollars) principal amount of Convertible Notes (6,117 shares), equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $9.81 per share of common stock. Such conversion rate will be subject to adjustment in certain events, but will not be adjusted for accrued or additional interest. In addition, the Indenture provides that, in no event will the Company issue shares upon conversion of Convertible Notes that exceed 19.99% of its common stock outstanding as of June 3, 2009, unless it has obtained stockholder approval in accordance with NASDAQ listing standards.
 
Following certain corporate transactions, the Company will increase the applicable conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its Convertible Notes in connection with such corporate transactions by a number of additional shares of common stock. The Company may not redeem the Convertible Notes prior to their stated maturity date. If the Company undergoes a fundamental change, holders may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the holders’ Convertible Notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be purchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including any additional interest, to, but excluding, the fundamental change purchase date.
 
The Convertible Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and contain customary covenants, such as reporting of annual and quarterly financial results, and restrictions on certain mergers, consolidations and changes of control. The Convertible Notes also contain customary events of default, including failure to pay principal or interest, breach of covenants, cross-acceleration to other debt in excess of $20,000, unsatisfied judgments of $20,000 or more and bankruptcy events. The Convertible Notes contain no financial covenants.
 
The Company is required to separately account for the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes in a manner that reflects the Company’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the date of issuance when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. The Company allocated approximately $8,822, net of tax of $5,593, of the $60,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes to the equity component, which represents a discount to the debt and will be amortized into interest expense using the effective interest method through June 1, 2014. Accordingly, the Company’s effective interest rate on the Convertible Notes will be 15.0%. The Company will recognize interest expense during the twelve months ended May 2010 on the Convertible Notes in an amount that approximates 15.0% of $45,585, the liability component of the Convertible Notes at the date of issuance. The Convertible Notes were further discounted by approximately $2,850 for the costs associated with the initial purchasers. These costs and other debt issuance costs will be amortized into interest expense over the life of the Convertible Notes. The interest expense recognized for the Convertible Notes in the twelve months ended May 2011 and subsequent periods will be greater as the discount is amortized and the effective interest method is applied. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized interest expense of $1,200 and $1,573, respectively, related to the coupon and $509 and $679, respectively, related to the conversion feature.
 
The estimated fair value of the Convertible Notes was estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on our current borrowing rate for an instrument with similar terms. At September 30, 2009 the fair value of the Convertible Notes approximated the carrying value of $46,265.
 
10.   Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk
 
In the normal course of business, the Company purchases and sells securities as both principal and agent. If another party to the transaction fails to fulfill its contractual obligation, the Company may incur a loss if the market value of the security is different from the contract amount of the transaction.
 
The Company deposits customers’ margin account securities with lending institutions as collateral for borrowings. If a lending institution does not return a security, the Company may be obligated to purchase the security in order to return it to the customer. In such circumstances, the Company may incur a loss equal to the amount by which the market value of the security on the date of nonperformance exceeds the value of the loan from the institution.


14


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
In the event a customer fails to satisfy its obligations, the Company may be required to purchase or sell financial instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the customer’s obligations. The Company seeks to control the risks associated with its customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with various regulatory and internal guidelines. The Company monitors required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, requires customers to deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary.
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell are collateralized by U.S. Government or U.S. Government-guaranteed securities. Such transactions may expose the Company to off-balance-sheet risk in the event such borrowers do not repay the loans and the value of collateral held is less than that of the underlying contract amount. A similar risk exists on Canadian Government securities purchased under agreements to resell that are a part of other assets. These agreements provide the Company with the right to maintain the relationship between market value of the collateral and the contract amount of the receivable.
 
The Company’s policy is to regularly monitor its market exposure and counterparty risk. The Company does not anticipate nonperformance by counterparties and maintains a policy of reviewing the credit standing of all parties, including customers, with which it conducts business.
 
For customers introduced on a fully-disclosed basis by other broker-dealers, the Company has the contractual right of recovery from such introducing broker-dealers in the event of nonperformance by the customer.
 
In addition, the Company has sold securities that it does not currently own and will therefore be obligated to purchase such securities at a future date. The Company has recorded these obligations in the financial statements at September 30, 2009, at fair values of the related securities and may incur a loss if the fair value of the securities increases subsequent to September 30, 2009.
 
11.   Stock-based compensation
 
The Company makes awards of stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended in May 2009 (the “2000 Stock Incentive Plan”), under which 4,466 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance. Of this amount, options and RSUs to purchase 2,564 shares of common stock, net of forfeitures have been granted and 1,902 shares remain available for future grants at September 30, 2009. The Company also provides an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”).
 
The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan includes three separate programs: (1) the discretionary option grant program under which eligible individuals in the Company’s employ or service (including officers, non-employee board members and consultants) may be granted options to purchase shares of common stock of the Company; (2) the stock issuance program under which such individuals may be issued shares of common stock directly or stock awards that vest over time, through the purchase of such shares or as a bonus tied to the performance of services; and (3) the automatic grant program under which grants will automatically be made at periodic intervals to eligible non-employee board members. The Company’s Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee may amend or modify the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan at any time, subject to any required stockholder approval.
 
Stock options
 
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not grant any stock options to employees.
 
The Company recorded compensation expense relating to options of approximately $301 and $337, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and $926 and $1,174, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.


15


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
A summary of the Company’s stock option activity is as follows:
 
                                 
                      Aggregate
 
                Weighted
    Intrinsic
 
          Weighted
    Average
    Value of
 
    Number of
    Average
    Contractual
    In-the-Money
 
    Shares     Exercise Price     Term     Options  
          (In whole dollars)     (In years)        
 
Outstanding, December 31, 2008
    1,028     $ 17.35       4.78     $ 206  
Granted
                       
Exercised
                       
Forfeited
    (82 )     19.74              
                                 
Outstanding, September 30, 2009
    946     $ 17.13       4.15     $ 329  
                                 
Options exercisable at September 30, 2009
    780     $ 16.85       4.19     $ 329  
                                 
 
There were no options exercised during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $724 of total unrecognized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to stock option plans that will be recognized over the weighted average period of .97 years.
 
Restricted Stock Units
 
A summary of the Company’s Restricted Stock Unit activity is as follows:
 
                                 
          Weighted
    Weighted
       
          Average
    Average
    Aggregate
 
    Number of
    Grant Date
    Contractual
    Intrinsic
 
    Units     Fair Value     Term     Value  
          (In whole dollars)     (In years)        
 
Outstanding, December 31, 2008
    749     $ 12.06       2.88     $ 5,704  
Granted
    203       6.66              
Distributed
    (185 )     13.19              
Terminated, cancelled or expired
    (24 )     16.53              
                                 
Outstanding, September 30, 2009
    743     $ 10.16       2.47     $ 7,234  
                                 
 
The Company recorded compensation expense relating to restricted stock units of approximately $710 and $626 during the three month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $2,750 and $1,893 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
As of September 30, 2009, there is approximately $5,937 of unamortized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested restricted stock units outstanding that will be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.42 years.
 
Employee stock purchase plan
 
In July 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the ESPP, designed to allow eligible employees of the Company to purchase shares of common stock, at semiannual intervals, through periodic payroll deductions. A total of 313 shares of common stock were initially reserved under the ESPP. The share reserve will automatically increase on the first trading day of January each calendar year, beginning in calendar year 2007, by an amount equal to 1% of the total number of outstanding shares of common stock on the last trading day in December in the prior calendar year. Under the current plan, no such annual increase may exceed 63 shares.


16


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
The ESPP may have a series of offering periods, each with a maximum duration of 24 months. Offering periods will begin at semi-annual intervals as determined by the plan administrator. Individuals regularly expected to work more than 20 hours per week for more than five calendar months per year may join an offering period on the start date of that period. However, employees may participate in only one offering period at a time. Participants may contribute 1% to 15% of their annual compensation through payroll deductions, and the accumulated deductions will be applied to the purchase of shares on each semi-annual purchase date. The purchase price per share shall be determined by the plan administrator at the start of each offering period and shall not be less than 85% of the lower of the fair market value per share on the start date of the offering period in which the participant is enrolled or the fair market value per share on the semi-annual purchase date. The plan administrator shall have the discretionary authority to establish the maximum number of shares of common stock purchasable per participant and in total by all participants in that particular offering period. The Company’s Board of Directors or its Compensation Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the ESPP at any time, and the ESPP will terminate no later than the last business day of June 2015. As of September 30, 2009, 500 shares of common stock had been reserved and 354 shares of common stock had been purchased by employees pursuant to the ESPP plan. The Company recognized expense of $45 and $36 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and $131 and $144 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
12.   Commitments and contingencies
 
From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business relating to matters including, but not limited to, our role as clearing broker for our correspondents. In some instances, but not all, where we are named in arbitration proceedings solely in our role as the clearing broker for our correspondents, we are able to pass through expenses related to the arbitration to the correspondent involved in the arbitration.
 
Under its bylaws, the Company has agreed to indemnify its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences arising as a result of the officer or director serving in such capacity. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its directors that require us to indemnify our directors to the extent permitted under our bylaws and applicable law. Although management is not aware of any claims, the maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited. However, the Company has a directors and officer liability insurance policy that limits its exposure and enables it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal and has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of September 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.
 
13.   Income taxes
 
The differences in income tax provided and the amounts determined by applying the statutory rate to income before income taxes results from the following:
 
                                 
    Three Months Ended
    Nine Months Ended
 
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
 
Federal statutory income tax rate
    35.0 %     35.0 %     35.0 %     35.0 %
Lower tax rates applicable to non-U.S. earnings
    (2.1 )     (1.0 )     (1.5 )     (1.1 )
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit
    2.0       3.1       2.5       3.0  
Return to provision true-up
    (1.6 )     (1.1 )     (0.5 )     (0.4 )
Other, net
    4.1       2.0       2.9       1.4  
                                 
      37.4 %     38.0 %     38.4 %     37.9 %
                                 


17


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
 
14.   Segment information
 
The Company is organized into operating segments based on geographic regions. These operating segments have been aggregated into three reportable segments; United States, Canada and Other. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based upon operating income before unusual and non-recurring items. The following table summarizes selected financial information.
 
                                 
    United
                   
As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
  States     Canada     Other     Consolidated  
 
Total revenues
  $ 64,128     $ 13,770     $ 2,926     $ 80,824  
Interest, net
    15,073       905       517       16,495  
Income before tax
    3,328       2,785       63       6,176  
Net income
    1,885       1,931       51       3,867  
Segment assets
    5,996,667       1,643,447       274,379       7,914,493  
Goodwill and intangibles
    128,428       538       312       129,278  
Capital expenditures
    3,339       604       738       4,681  
Depreciation and amortization
    3,446       287       399       4,132  
Amortization of intangibles
    756                   756  
 
                                 
    United
                   
As of and for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
  States     Canada     Other     Consolidated  
 
Total revenues
  $ 81,223     $ 18,410     $ 5,289     $ 104,922  
Interest, net
    18,257       2,703       670       21,630  
Income before tax
    8,479       3,197       385       12,061  
Net income
    5,037       2,163       278       7,478  
Segment assets
    5,233,041       1,884,018       330,635       7,447,694  
Goodwill and intangibles
    98,995       538       312       99,845  
Capital expenditures
    3,125       322       882       4,329  
Depreciation and amortization
    3,320       396       357       4,073  
Amortization of intangibles
    1,040                   1,040  
 
                                 
    United
                   
As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
  States     Canada     Other     Consolidated  
 
Total revenues
  $ 195,263     $ 38,678     $ 8,471     $ 242,412  
Interest, net
    46,870       2,748       1,404       51,022  
Income before tax
    12,573       6,320       52       18,945  
Net income
    7,241       4,409       20       11,670  
Segment assets
    5,996,667       1,643,447       274,379       7,914,493  
Goodwill and intangibles
    128,428       538       312       129,278  
Capital expenditures
    15,055       981       1,797       17,833  
Depreciation and amortization
    10,214       859       1,119       12,192  
Amortization of intangibles
    2,465                   2,465  
 


18


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
                                 
    United
                   
As of and for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
  States     Canada     Other     Consolidated  
 
Total revenues
  $ 229,847     $ 56,852     $ 16,472     $ 303,171  
Interest, net
    49,826       10,047       1,728       61,601  
Income (loss) before tax
    22,563       12,089       (110 )     34,542  
Net income (loss)
    13,285       8,268       (96 )     21,457  
Segment assets
    5,233,041       1,884,018       330,635       7,447,694  
Goodwill and intangibles
    98,995       538       312       99,845  
Capital expenditures
    10,644       784       2,186       13,614  
Depreciation and amortization
    9,900       1,207       933       12,040  
Amortization of intangibles
    3,192       11             3,203  
 
15.   Regulatory requirements
 
PFSI is subject to the SEC Uniform Net Capital Rule (SEC Rule 15c3-1), which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital. PFSI elected to use the alternative method, permitted by Rule 15c3-1, which requires that PFSI maintain minimum net capital, as defined, equal to the greater of $250 or 2% of aggregate debit balances, as defined in the SEC’s Reserve Requirement Rule (Rule 15c3-3). At September 30, 2009, PFSI had net capital of $97,047, and was $74,432 in excess of its required net capital of $22,615. At December 31, 2008, PFSI had net capital of $85,535, and was $66,558 in excess of its required net capital of $18,977.
 
Our Penson GHCO, PFSL, PFSC and Penson Australia subsidiaries are also subject to minimum financial and capital requirements. All subsidiaries were in compliance with their minimum financial and capital requirements as of September 30, 2009.
 
16.   Vendor related asset impairment
 
In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc. is a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case filed on August 17, 2007 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois by Sentinel Management Group, Inc., a registered futures commission merchant (“Sentinel”). Prior to the filing of this action, Penson GHCO and Penson Financial Futures, Inc. (“PFFI”) held customer segregated accounts with Sentinel totaling approximately $36 million. Sentinel subsequently sold certain securities to Citadel Equity Fund, Ltd. and Citadel Limited Partnership. On August 20, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court authorized distributions of 95 percent of the proceeds Sentinel received from the sale of those securities to certain FCM clients of Sentinel, including Penson GHCO. This distribution to the Penson GHCO and PFFI customer segregated accounts along with a distribution received immediately prior to the bankruptcy filing totaled approximately $25.4 million.
 
On May 12, 2008, a committee of Sentinel creditors, consisting of a majority of non-FCM creditors, together with the trustee appointed to manage the affairs and liquidation of Sentinel (the “Sentinel Trustee”), filed with the Court their proposed Plan of Liquidation (the “Committee Plan”) and on May 13, 2008 filed a Disclosure Statement related thereto. The Committee Plan allows the Sentinel Trustee to seek the return from FCMs, including Penson GHCO and PFFI, of a portion of the funds previously distributed to their customer segregated accounts. On June 19, 2008, the Court entered an order approving the Disclosure Statement over objections by Penson GHCO and others. On September 16, 2008, the Sentinel Trustee filed suit against Penson GHCO and PFFI along with several other FCMs that received distributions to their customer segregated accounts from Sentinel. The suit against Penson GHCO and PFFI seeks the return of approximately $23.6 million of post-bankruptcy petition transfers and $14.4 million of pre-bankruptcy petition transfers. The suit also seeks to declare that the funds distributed to the customer segregated accounts of Penson GHCO and PFFI by Sentinel are the property of the Sentinel bankruptcy estate rather than the property of customers of Penson GHCO and PFFI.

19


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
On December 15, 2008, over the objections of Penson GHCO and PFFI, the court entered an order confirming the Committee Plan, and the Committee Plan became effective on December 17, 2008. On January 7, 2009, Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their answer and affirmative defenses to the suit brought by the Sentinel Trustee. Also, on January 7, 2009, Penson GHCO, PFFI and a number of other FCMs that had placed customer funds with Sentinel filed motions to withdraw the reference with the federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois, effectively asking the federal district court to remove the Sentinel suits against the FCMs from the bankruptcy court and consolidate them with other Sentinel related actions pending in the federal district court. On April 8, 2009, the Sentinel Trustee filed an amended complaint, which added a claim for unjust enrichment. Penson GHCO and PFFI’s response seeking to dismiss this claim was filed on May 8, 2009. On June 30, 2009, the Court denied the motion to dismiss without prejudice. The Court also held a preliminary pretrial hearing on June 30, 2009, and ordered that the first trial of the Sentinel Trustee’s claims against one FCM would commence on July 6, 2010, and the thirteen remaining trials would be scheduled at one month intervals thereafter. The trial of the Sentinel Trustee’s claims against Penson GHCO and PFFI is scheduled to proceed from September 20-23, 2010.
 
On July 31, 2009, Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order denying their motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim. On September 1, 2009, the Court denied the motion for reconsideration without prejudice. On September 11, 2009, Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their amended answer and amended affirmative defenses to the Sentinel Trustee’s amended complaint. On October 28, 2009, the federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois granted Penson GHCO, PFFI, and certain other FCM’s motions requesting removal of the matters referenced above from the bankruptcy court, thereby removing these matters to the federal district court. While the trial schedule referenced above is still pending, it may change given the granting of the motions removing these matters to the federal district court.
 
The Company believes that the Court was correct in ordering the prior distributions and Penson GHCO and PFFI intend to continue to vigorously defend their position. However, there can be no assurance that any actions by Penson GHCO or PFFI will result in a limitation or avoidance of potential repayment liabilities. In the event that Penson GHCO and PFFI are obligated to return all previously distributed funds to the Sentinel Estate, any losses the Company might suffer would most likely be partially mitigated as it is likely that Penson GHCO and PFFI would share in the funds ultimately disbursed by the Sentinel Estate.
 
17.   Stock repurchase program
 
On July 3, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase up to $25.0 million of its common stock in open market purchases and privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program was completed in October 2007. On December 6, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the Company to purchase an additional $12.5 million of its common stock. No shares were repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The Company has approximately $4.7 million available under the current repurchase program as of September 30, 2009.
 
18.   Subsequent events
 
On November 2, 2009, PWI, together with PFSI, entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) and its wholly owned subsidiary Ridge Clearing & Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. (“Ridge”) to acquire substantially all of Ridge’s contracts with its securities clearing clients.
 
Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, PWI will pay between $60 million and $70 million in total consideration (the “Purchase Price”) to Broadridge consisting of (a) a five-year subordinated note (the “Seller Note”) payable by PWI bearing interest at an annual rate equal to 90-day LIBOR plus 5.5%, and (b) shares of PWI’s common stock (“PWI Common Stock”) equal to the lesser of (i) the number of shares of PWI Common Stock equal to the quotient of one third of the Purchase Price divided by the volume weighted-average selling price of PWI Common Stock over the 10 trading day period immediately prior to the closing, (ii) the number of shares of PWI Common Stock


20


Table of Contents

 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
 
equal to 9.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of PWI (the “Common Stock”) as of the close of business on the business day immediately prior to the closing, or (iii) 2,517,451 shares of PWI Common Stock. The specific amount of such consideration will be determined immediately prior to closing pursuant to an agreed formula based upon the revenues attributable to the contracts being purchased by PFSI. The allocation of the consideration between the Seller Note and the PWI Common Stock will also be determined prior to the closing of the transaction. The Purchase Price will be subject to certain adjustments post-closing upon the occurrence of agreed upon events.
 
Concurrent with entering into the Asset Purchase Agreement, PWI and Broadridge entered into a ten-year master services agreement (the “Outsourcing Agreement”). Under the Outsourcing Agreement, Ridge will provide certain securities processing and back-office services to PFSI. This agreement will include selective processing services for PFSI’s existing securities processing operations and back-office functions, as well as selective processing services related to the clearing client contracts acquired by PFSI from Ridge. The provision of services under the Outsourcing Agreement is conditioned upon finalization of certain service level agreements, receipt of regulatory approvals and the closing of the transaction under the Asset Purchase Agreement.
 
Concurrent with the closing of the transaction, the parties will enter into a number of ancillary agreements, including a Joint Selling Agreement and a Stockholder’s and Registration Rights Agreement.
 
The Joint Selling Agreement will be entered into by Broadridge, Ridge, PWI and PFSI and will have a term concurrent with the term of the Outsourcing Agreement. Under the Joint Selling Agreement, the parties will engage in activities to offer, in the case of PFSI, Ridge’s self-clearing and securities processing solutions, and in the case of Ridge, PFSI and its affiliates’ correspondent clearing solutions, and will mutually agree to fee arrangements with respect to activities contemplated by the Joint Selling Agreement.
 
The Stockholder’s and Registration Rights Agreement will restrict the transfer of the PWI Common Stock to be received as a portion of the consideration for a period of one year from the closing of the transaction. Thereafter, Broadridge will be entitled to one demand registration right and piggy back registration rights, subject to customary terms and conditions. In addition, following expiration of the one-year restricted period, Broadridge will be entitled to sell the PWI Common Stock as permitted under SEC Rule 144. In the event PWI redeems or repurchases any of its Common Stock, if necessary, it will repurchase the PWI Common Stock on a pro rata basis on the same terms and conditions so that Broadridge’s beneficial ownership of PWI Common Stock will not exceed 9.9% of PWI’s issued and outstanding Common Stock following any such repurchases or redemptions.
 
In addition, the Asset Purchase Agreement contemplates PWI raising $50 million in additional regulatory capital with respect to its operations pertaining to the correspondent clearing contracts to be acquired. At PWI’s option, Broadridge has agreed to lend, under certain circumstances, this amount to PWI pursuant to an eighteen-month subordinated note (the “Backstop Note”) payable by PWI and bearing interest at an annual rate equal to 90-day LIBOR plus 14%.
 
The Seller Note and, if utilized, the Backstop Note, will be subordinated to PWI bank debt and be subject to customary subordination provisions. Therefore, among other things, in the event there is a payment default, or other event of default that would permit acceleration of PWI bank debt, payment on the Seller Note and, if utilized, the Backstop Note, will be blocked for up to 270 days in any twelve-month period.
 
On November 2, 2009 PWI entered into the Third Amendment (the “Third Amendment”) to its Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2009, with Regions Bank, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer, the lenders party thereto and other parties thereto, as amended by the First Amendment on May 27, 2009 and Second Amendment dated September 22, 2009 (the “Credit Agreement”). The Third Amendment, among other things, makes changes to a number of covenants in the Credit Agreement, including the financial covenants, in order to permit the acquisition of the clearing contracts of Ridge and the issuance of the Common Stock portion of the Purchase Price, the Seller Note and the Backstop Note. In addition, the Third Amendment authorizes PWI to raise additional capital. In the event that the Backstop Note has been issued at the time of such capital raising, the Third Amendment requires that the proceeds will be used to repay the Backstop Note.


21


Table of Contents

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in our December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32878), filed with the SEC and with the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
 
Overview
 
We are a leading provider of a broad range of critical securities and futures processing infrastructure products and services to the global financial services industry. Our products and services include securities and futures clearing and execution, financing and cash management technology and other related offerings, and we provide tools and services to support trading in multiple markets, asset classes and currencies.
 
Since starting our business in 1995 with three correspondents, we have grown to serve approximately 244 active securities clearing correspondents and 43 futures clearing correspondents as of September 30, 2009. Our net revenues were $72.2 million and $79.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, while our net revenues were $215.5 million and $224.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our revenues consist primarily of transaction processing fees earned from our clearing operations and net interest income earned from our margin lending activities, from investing customers’ cash and from stock lending activities. Our clearing and commission fees are based principally on the number of trades we clear. We receive interest income from financing the securities purchased on margin by the customers of our clients. We also earn licensing and development revenues from fees we charge to our clients for their use of our technology solutions.
 
Fiscal 2009 Highlights
 
  •  We founded Penson Australia, which we expect to be operational in the fourth quarter of 2009.
 
  •  In June 2009 we issued $60 million of 8.00% convertible notes due June 1, 2014.
 
  •  In September 2009 we amended our revolving credit facility, increasing it to $100 million.
 
  •  We cleared more than 96 million option contracts in the third quarter, a new record.
 
  •  We moved additional customer segregated funds into higher yielding FDIC insured bank accounts during the quarter with approximately $2.3 billion moved as of September 30, 2009.
 
  •  On November 2, 2009 we signed a definitive agreement to acquire the clearing and execution services business of Ridge Clearing & Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. for an anticipated purchase price of between $60-$70 million.
 
Financial overview
 
Net revenues
 
Revenues
 
We generate revenues from most clients in several different categories. Clients generating revenues for us from clearing transactions almost always also generate significant interest income from related balances. Revenues from clearing transactions are driven largely by the volume of trading activities of the customers of our correspondents and proprietary trading by our correspondents. Our average clearing revenue per trade is a function of numerous pricing elements that vary based on individual correspondent volumes, customer mix, and the level of margin debit balances and credit balances. Our clearing revenue fluctuates as a result of these factors as well as changes in trading volume. We focus on maintaining the profitability of our overall correspondent relationships, including the clearing revenue from trades and net interest from related customer margin balances, and by reducing associated variable costs. We collect the fees for our services directly from customer accounts when trades are processed. We only remit


22


Table of Contents

commissions charged by our correspondents to them after deducting our charges. For this reason, we have no significant receivables to collect.
 
We often refer to our interest income as “Interest, gross” to distinguish this category of revenue from “Interest, net” that is generally used in our industry. Interest, gross is generated by charges to customers or correspondents on margin balances and interest earned by investing customers’ cash, and therefore these revenues fluctuate based on the volume of our total margin loans outstanding, the volume of the cash balances we hold for our correspondents’ customers, the rates of interest we can competitively charge on margin loans and the rates at which we can invest such balances. We also earn interest from our stock borrowing and lending activities.
 
Technology revenues consist of transactional, development and licensing revenues generated by Nexa. A significant portion of these revenues are collected directly from clearing customers along with other charges for clearing services as described above. Most development revenues and some transaction revenues are collected directly from clients and are reflected as receivables until they are collected.
 
Other revenues include charges assessed directly to customers for certain transactions or types of accounts, trade aggregation and profits from proprietary trading activities, including foreign exchange transactions and fees charged to our correspondents’ customers. Subject to certain exceptions, our clearing brokers in the U.S., Canada and the U.K. each generate these types of transactions.
 
Interest expense from securities operations
 
Interest expense is incurred in our daily operations in connection with interest we pay on credit balances we hold and on short-term borrowings we make to fund activities of our correspondents and their customers. We have two primary sources of borrowing: commercial banks and stock lending institutions. Regulations differ by country as to how operational needs can be funded, but we often find that stock loans that are secured with customer or correspondent securities as collateral can be obtained at a lower rate of interest than loans from commercial banks. Operationally, we review cash requirements each day and borrow the requirements from the most cost effective source.
 
Revenues from clearing and commission fees represented 51% of our total net revenues for the three months ended at each of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and 51% of our total net revenues for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net interest income represented 23% and 27% of our total net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 24% and 27% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Expenses
 
Employee compensation and benefits
 
Our largest category of expense is the compensation and benefits that we pay to our employees, which includes salaries, bonuses, group insurance, contributions to benefit programs, stock compensation and other related employee costs. These costs vary by country according to the local prevailing wage standards. We utilize technology whenever practical to limit the number of employees and thus keep costs competitive. In the U.S., most of our employees are located in cities where employee costs are lower than where our largest competitors primarily operate. A portion of total employee compensation is paid in the form of bonuses and performance-based compensation. As a result, depending on the performance of particular business units and the overall Company performance, total employee compensation and benefits could vary materially from period to period.
 
Other operating expenses
 
Expenses incurred to process trades include floor brokerage and exchange and clearance fees, and those expenses tend to vary significantly with the level of trading activity. The related data processing and communication costs vary less with the level of trading activity. Occupancy and equipment expenses include lease expenses for office space, computers and other equipment that we require to operate our businesses. Other expenses include legal, regulatory, professional consulting, accounting, travel and miscellaneous expenses.


23


Table of Contents

In addition, as a public company, we incur additional costs for external advisers such as legal, accounting, auditing and investor relations services, as well as additional costs for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
Profitability of services provided
 
Management records revenue for the clearing operations and technology business separately. We record expenses in the aggregate as many of these expenses are attributable to multiple business activities. As such, net profitability before tax is determined in the aggregate. We also separately record interest income and interest expense to determine the overall profitability of this activity.
 
Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008
 
Overview
 
Results of operations declined for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to lower clearing and commission fees and lower net interest earned, partially offset by higher other revenues. Clearing and commission fees decreased due to lower equity and futures volumes, which was partially offset by higher options volumes. The decline in net interest earned is a result of higher customer average paying balances, lower average balances in our conduit business and lower interest spreads in the September 30, 2009 quarter as compared to the year ago quarter. Other revenues increased due to higher execution services revenues. Operating results decreased $5.9 million during the third quarter of 2009 as compared to the third quarter of 2008, for our U.S., Canadian and London businesses.
 
Our U.S. operating subsidiaries experienced a decrease in operating profits of approximately $3.8 million due to lower net interest income and technology revenues and higher communications and data processing costs resulting from a move to SunGard’s latest generation system consisting of equipment dedicated to our U.S. clearing business. Our Canadian business experienced an operating profit of $2.8 million for the September 30, 2009 quarter compared to an operating profit of $3.2 million in the September 30, 2008 quarter due primarily to decreases in net interest income. London incurred an operating loss of $1.4 million in the current quarter compared to an operating loss of $1.0 million in the year ago quarter due primarily to lower net interest income.
 
While we have continued to see profitability in our stock loan conduit business, we have seen decreased demand resulting from certain regulatory changes. The business consists of a “matched book” where we borrow stock from an independent party in the securities business and then loan the exact same shares to a third party who needs the shares. We pay interest expense on the borrowings and earn interest income on the loans, earning an average net spread of 50 to 75 basis points on the transactions. Due to regulatory and marketplace changes regarding short-selling of certain securities, clearing brokers that violate certain short-selling rules, including the failure to timely deliver securities, are now subject to significantly more stringent penalties. These changes as well as potential future regulatory changes have had and may continue to have a negative impact on the earnings we have historically seen in our conduit business.
 
The above factors resulted in lower operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008.


24


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the increases (decreases) in the categories of revenues and expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008.
 
                 
          %
 
    Change
    Change from
 
    Amount     Previous Period  
    (In thousands)        
 
Revenues:
               
Clearing and commission fees
  $ (3,304 )     (8.2 )
Technology
    76       1.2  
Interest:
               
Interest on asset based balances
    (10,006 )     (34.9 )
Interest on conduit borrows
    (10,366 )     (61.3 )
Money market
    (1,782 )     (106.9 )
                 
Interest, gross
    (22,154 )     (46.9 )
Other revenue
    1,284       11.4  
                 
Total revenues
    (24,098 )     (23.0 )
                 
Interest expense:
               
Interest expense on liability based balances
    (8,494 )     (71.6 )
Interest on conduit loans
    (8,525 )     (62.0 )
                 
Interest expense from securities operations
    (17,019 )     (66.4 )
                 
Net revenues
    (7,079 )     (8.9 )
                 
Expenses:
               
Employee compensation and benefits
    (993 )     (3.5 )
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
    (24 )     (0.3 )
Communications and data processing
    1,471       14.3  
Occupancy and equipment
    (388 )     (5.0 )
Other expenses
    (3,855 )     (33.5 )
Interest expense on long-term debt
    2,595       293.2  
                 
      (1,194 )     (1.8 )
                 
Income before income taxes
  $ (5,885 )     (48.8 )
                 
 
Net Revenues
 
Net revenues decreased $7.1 million, or 8.9%, to $72.2 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributed to the following:
 
Clearing and commission fees decreased $3.3 million, or 8.2%, to $36.9 million during this same period primarily due to a lower volume of equity and futures transactions, offset in part by higher option volumes.
 
Technology revenue increased $.1 million, or 1.2%, to $6.3 million due to higher recurring revenue offset by lower development revenue.
 
Interest, gross decreased $22.2 million or 46.9%, to $25.1 million during the quarter over quarter period. Interest revenues from customer balances decreased $11.8 million or 38.9% to $18.5 million as our average daily interest rate decreased 93 basis points (during this same period the average federal funds rate decreased 175 basis points) or 40.3% to 1.38% offset by an increase in our average daily interest earning assets of $441.9 million, or 8.9% to $5.4 billion. Interest from our stock conduit borrows operations decreased $10.4 million or 61.3% to $6.6 million, as a result of a decrease in our average daily assets of $1.5 billion or 68.0% to $697.7 million, offset by


25


Table of Contents

an increase in our average daily interest rate of approximately 66 basis points, or 21.3% to 3.76%. (See page 22 for a description of our conduit business.)
 
Other revenue increased $1.3 million, or 11.4%, to $12.6 million due to increased execution services revenues of $1.3 million and increased fees revenues, partially offset by decreases in equity and foreign exchange trading.
 
Interest expense from securities operations decreased $17.0 million, or 66.4%, to $8.6 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Interest expense from clearing operations decreased approximately $8.5 million, or 71.6%, to $3.4 million due to an 87 basis point or 75.7% decrease in our average daily interest rate to .28% offset by an increase in our average daily balances on our short-term obligations of $649.7 million, or 15.8%, to $4.8 billion. Interest from our stock conduit loans decreased $8.5 million, or 62.0% to $5.2 million due to a $1.5 billion, or 68.0% decrease in our average daily balances to $695.6 million, offset by a 48 basis point increase, or 19.0% in our average daily interest rate to 3.01%.
 
Interest, net decreased from $21.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to $16.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. This decrease was due to a higher ratio of customer interest paying balances to interest earning balances combined with significantly lower conduit balances, and a lower interest rate spread of 6 basis points on customer balances, offset slightly by a higher interest rate spread of 18 basis points on conduit balances.
 
Employee compensation and benefits
 
Total employee costs decreased $1.0 million, or 3.5%, to $27.2 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to lower incentive-based compensation expense. Employee count remained fairly constant, increasing by 1.3% to 1,020 as of September 30, 2009.
 
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
 
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees decreased less than $.1 million, or .3%, to $8.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 from the quarter ended September 30, 2008, due to lower equity and futures volumes offset in part by higher options volumes.
 
Communication and data processing
 
Total expenses for our communication and data processing requirements increased $1.5 million, or 14.3%, to $11.7 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009. This increase reflects costs associated with additional data processing capacity resulting from a move to SunGard’s latest generation system consisting of equipment dedicated to our U.S. clearing business.
 
Occupancy and equipment
 
Total expenses for occupancy and equipment decreased $.4 million, or 5.0%, to $7.4 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to costs associated with our occupancy leases.
 
Other expenses
 
Other expenses decreased $3.9 million, or 33.5%, to $7.7 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to the quarter ended September 30, 2009, due to a $2.4 million litigation reserve recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and decreased travel expenses and professional fees, offset in part by increased legal fees.
 
Interest expense on long-term debt
 
Interest expense on long-term debt increased 293.2% from $.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 to $3.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as a result of higher interest rates on our revolving credit facility, combined with additional interest expense of approximately $1.9 million associated with our senior convertible notes issued on June 3, 2009.


26


Table of Contents

Provision for income taxes
 
Income tax expense, based on an effective income tax rate of approximately 37.4%, was $2.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as compared to an effective tax rate of 38.0% and income tax expense of $4.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily attributed to lower operating profit in the current quarter. The lower effective rate is attributable to lower pretax income in the United States.
 
Net income
 
As a result of the foregoing, net income decreased to $3.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 from $7.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
 
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008
 
Overview
 
Results of operations declined for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to lower clearing and commission fees, lower net interest revenue, higher floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees due to the timing of rebates received in the prior year and higher communications and data processing fees resulting from a move to SunGard’s latest generation system consisting of equipment dedicated to our U.S. clearing business, partially offset by higher technology and other revenues. Technology increased due to licensing revenue for the current nine month period that did not begin until the third quarter of 2008. The decline in net interest earned is a result of higher customer average paying balances, lower average balances in our conduit business and lower interest spreads on our customer balances in the current period as compared to the year ago period, offset slightly by higher interest rate spreads on our conduit business and higher customer balances. Operating results declined $15.6 million during the first nine months of 2009 as compared to the first nine months of 2008, for our U.S., Canadian and London businesses.
 
Our U.S. operating subsidiaries experienced a decrease in operating profits of approximately $2.5 million due to lower net interest income and higher communications and data processing costs, offset in part by higher technology revenue. Our Canadian business experienced an operating profit of $6.3 million for the September 30, 2009 period compared to an operating profit of $12.1 million in the September 30, 2008 period due primarily to lower net interest income. London incurred an operating loss of $4.0 million in the current period compared to an operating loss of $1.6 million in the year ago period, due primarily to the loss of the contracts for difference business and lower net interest income.
 
While we have continued to see profitability in our stock loan conduit business, we have seen decreased demand resulting from regulatory changes. The business consists of a “matched book” where we borrow stock from an independent party in the securities business and then loan the exact same shares to a third party who needs the shares. We pay interest expense on the borrowings and earn interest income on the loans, earning an average net spread of 50 to 75 basis points on the transactions. Due to regulatory and marketplace changes regarding short-selling of certain securities, clearing brokers that violate certain short-selling rules, including the failure to timely deliver securities, are now subject to significantly more stringent penalties. These changes and potential future regulatory changes have had and may continue to have a negative impact on the earnings we have historically seen in our conduit business.
 
The above factors resulted in lower operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.


27


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the increases (decreases) in the categories of revenues and expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
 
                 
          %
 
    Change
    Change from
 
    Amount     Previous Period  
    (In thousands)        
 
Revenues:
               
Clearing and commission fees
  $ (3,857 )     (3.4 )
Technology
    2,294       14.3  
Interest:
               
Interest on asset based balances
    (37,387 )     (40.5 )
Interest on conduit borrows
    (22,348 )     (51.8 )
Money market
    (2,954 )     (56.2 )
                 
Interest, gross
    (62,689 )     (44.6 )
Other revenue
    3,493       10.8  
                 
Total revenues
    (60,759 )     (20.0 )
                 
Interest expense:
               
Interest expense on liability based balances
    (33,508 )     (75.0 )
Interest on conduit loans
    (18,602 )     (54.1 )
                 
Interest expense from securities operations
    (52,110 )     (65.9 )
                 
Net revenues
    (8,649 )     (3.9 )
                 
Expenses:
               
Employee compensation and benefits
    (1,176 )     (1.4 )
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
    3,656       17.4  
Communications and data processing
    4,829       16.6  
Occupancy and equipment
    (93 )     (0.4 )
Other expenses
    (3,262 )     (11.7 )
Interest expense on long-term debt
    2,994       98.3  
                 
      6,948       3.7  
                 
Income before income taxes
  $ (15,597 )     (45.2 )
                 
 
Net Revenues
 
Net revenues decreased $8.6 million, or 3.9%, to $215.5 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributed to the following:
 
Clearing and commission fees decreased $3.9 million, or 3.4%, to $110.2 million during this same period primarily due to a lower volume of equity and futures transactions, offset by an increase in options contracts and a change in our mix of correspondents.
 
Technology revenue increased $2.3 million, or 14.3%, to $18.4 million primarily due to approximately $1.9 million in licensing revenue and higher recurring revenue, offset by lower development revenue.
 
Interest, gross decreased $62.7 million or 44.6%, to $78.0 million during the first nine months of 2009 compared to the 2008 period. Interest revenues from customer balances decreased $40.3 million or 41.4% to $57.1 million as our average daily interest rate decreased 114 basis points (during this same period the average federal funds rate decreased 218 basis points) or 43.2% to 1.50% offset by an increase in our average daily interest earning assets of $223.5 million, or 4.8% to $4.9 billion. Interest from our stock conduit borrows operations decreased $22.3 million or 51.8% to $20.8 million, due to decrease in our average daily assets of $1.0 billion or


28


Table of Contents

61.4% to $657.1 million, offset by an increase in our average daily interest rate of approximately 84 basis points, or 24.8% to 4.23% (see page 25 for a description of our conduit business).
 
Other revenue increased $3.5 million, or 10.8%, to $35.8 million due to increased revenues of $1.3 million from our trade aggregation business in the U.S and increased execution services revenues of $3.2 million, offset by decreases in equity and foreign exchange trading.
 
Interest expense from securities operations decreased $52.1 million, or 65.9%, to $27.0 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to the nine month period ended September 30, 2009. Interest expense from clearing operations decreased approximately $33.5 million, or 75.0%, to $11.2 million due to a 118 basis point or 77.6% decrease in our average daily interest rate to .34%, offset by an increase in our average daily balances of our short-term obligations of $466.1 million, or 11.9%, to $4.4 billion. Interest from our stock conduit loans decreased $18.6 million, or 54.1% to $15.8 million due to a $1.0 billion, or 61.3% decrease in our average daily balances to $655.1 million, offset by a 50 basis point increase, or 18.5% in our average daily interest rate to 3.21%.
 
Interest, net decreased from $61.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $51.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease was due to a higher ratio of customer interest paying balances to interest earning balances combined with significantly lower conduit balances, offset slightly by a higher interest rate spread of 4 basis points on customer balances and 34 basis points on conduit balances.
 
Employee compensation and benefits
 
Total employee costs decreased $1.2 million, or 1.4%, to $85.3 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009, primarily due to lower incentive-based compensation expense, offset by $.8 million of severance costs in the first quarter. Employee count remained fairly constant, increasing 1.3% to 1,020 as of September 30, 2009.
 
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees
 
Floor brokerage, exchange and clearance fees increased $3.7 million, or 17.4% to $24.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to industry rebates received in the prior year period that were not received in the current period due to changes in the timing in which rebates are received. These expenses also reflected increased fees due to higher options volumes, offset in part by lower equity and futures volumes.
 
Communication and data processing
 
Total expenses for our communication and data processing requirements increased $4.8 million, or 16.6%, to $33.9 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This increase reflects costs associated with additional data processing capacity resulting from a move to SunGard’s latest generation system consisting of equipment dedicated to our U.S. clearing business.
 
Occupancy and equipment
 
Total expenses for occupancy and equipment decreased $.1 million, or .4%, to $22.0 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to costs associated with our occupancy leases.
 
Other expenses
 
Other expenses decreased $3.3 million, or 11.7%, to $24.5 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease relates to a $2.4 million litigation reserve recorded in the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and lower travel expenses, offset in part by increases in legal and consulting fees.


29


Table of Contents

Interest expense on long-term debt
 
Interest expense on long-term debt increased from $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $6.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of additional interest expense of approximately $2.5 million associated with our senior convertible notes issued on June 3, 2009 and higher interest expense on our revolving credit facility due to higher interest rates.
 
Provision for income taxes
 
Income tax expense, based on an effective income tax rate of approximately 38.4%, was $7.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to an effective tax rate of 37.9% and income tax expense of $13.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily attributed to decreased operating profit in the current period offset by a higher effective tax rate. The higher effective rate is primarily attributable to permanent differences encompassing a higher percentage of pretax income in the current period as compared to the prior period due to lower pretax earnings.
 
Net income
 
As a result of the foregoing, net income decreased to $11.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $21.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
 
Liquidity and capital resources
 
Operating Liquidity — Our clearing broker-dealer subsidiaries typically finance their operating liquidity needs through secured bank lines of credit and through secured borrowings from stock lending counterparties in the securities business, which we refer to as “stock loans.” Most of our borrowings are driven by the activities of our clients or correspondents, primarily the purchase of securities on margin by those parties. As of September 30, 2009, we had seven uncommitted lines of credit with seven financial institutions for the purpose of facilitating our clearing business as well as the activities of our customers and correspondents. Five of these lines of credit permitted us to borrow up to an aggregate of approximately $308.5 million while two lines had no stated limit. As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately $363.4 million in short-term bank loans outstanding, which left approximately $154.8 million available under our lines of credit with stated limitations.
 
As noted above, our businesses that are clearing brokers also have the ability to borrow through stock loan arrangements. There are no specific limitations on our borrowing capacities pursuant to our stock loan arrangements. Borrowings under these arrangements bear interest at variable rates, are secured primarily by our firm inventory or customers’ margin account securities, and are repayable on demand. At September 30, 2009, we had approximately $234.4 million in borrowings under stock loan arrangements.
 
As a result of our customers’ and correspondents’ aforementioned activities, our operating cash flows may vary from year to year.
 
Capital Resources — PWI provides capital to all of our subsidiaries. PWI has the ability to obtain capital through equipment leases and through a $100.0 million line of credit under a secured credit facility. Equipment purchased under capital leases is typically secured by the equipment itself. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had $70.0 million outstanding on this line of credit that expires in April 2010. On June 3, 2009, the Company issued $60 million aggregate principal amount of 8.00% Senior Convertible Notes due 2014. The net proceeds from the sale of the convertible notes were approximately $56.2 after initial purchaser discounts and other expenses.
 
As a holding company, we access the earnings of our operating subsidiaries through the receipt of dividends from these subsidiaries. Some of our subsidiaries are subject to the requirements of securities regulators in their respective countries relating to liquidity and capital standards, which may serve to limit funds available for the payment of dividends to the holding company.
 
Our principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary, PFSI, is subject to the SEC Uniform Net Capital Rule (“Rule 15c3-1”), which requires the maintenance of a minimum net capital. PFSI elected to use the alternative method, permitted by Rule 15c3-1, which requires PFSI to maintain minimum net capital, as defined, equal to the


30


Table of Contents

greater of $250,000 or 2% of aggregate debit balances, as defined in the SEC’s Reserve Requirement Rule (“Rule 15c3-3”). At September 30, 2009, PFSI had net capital of $97.0 million, which was $74.4 million in excess of its required net capital of $22.6 million.
 
Our Penson GHCO, PFSL, PFSC and Penson Australia subsidiaries are also subject to minimum financial and capital requirements. These requirements are not material either individually or collectively to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2009. All subsidiaries were in compliance with their minimum financial and capital requirements as of September 30, 2009.
 
Contractual obligations and commitments
 
We have contractual obligations to make future payments under long-term debt and long-term non-cancelable lease agreements and have contingent commitments under a variety of commercial arrangements. See Note 12 to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our commitments and contingencies.
 
Off-balance sheet arrangements
 
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which are established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. See Note 10 to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for information on off-balance sheet arrangements.
 
Critical accounting policies
 
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We review our estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on our experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in the notes to consolidated financial statements, we believe the accounting policies that require management to make assumptions and estimates involving significant judgment are those relating to revenue recognition, fair value, software development and the valuation of stock-based compensation.
 
Revenue recognition
 
Revenues from clearing transactions are recorded in the Company’s unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements on a trade date basis. Cash received in advance of revenue recognition is recorded as deferred revenue.
 
There are three major types of technology revenues: (1) completed products that are processing transactions every month generate revenues per transaction which are recognized on a trade date basis; (2) these same completed products may also generate monthly terminal charges for the delivery of data or processing capability that are recognized in the month to which the charges apply; (3) technology development services are recognized when the service is performed or under the terms of the technology development contract as described below. Interest and other revenues are recorded in the month that they are earned.
 
To date, the majority of our technology development contracts have not required significant production, modification or customization such that the service element of our overall relationship with the client generally does meet the criteria for separate accounting under the FASB Codification. All of our products are fully functional when initially delivered to our clients, and any additional technology development work that is contracted for is as outlined below. Technology development contracts generally cover only additional work that is performed to modify existing products to meet the specific needs of individual customers. This work can range from cosmetic modifications to the customer interface (private labeling) to custom development of additional features requested


31


Table of Contents

by the client. Technology revenues arising from development contracts are recorded on a percentage-of-completion basis based on outputs unless there are significant uncertainties preventing the use of this approach in which case a completed contract basis is used. The Company’s revenue recognition policy is consistent with applicable revenue recognition guidance in the FASB Codification and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition (“SAB 104”).
 
Fair value
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are primarily recorded at fair value.
 
In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches, including market, income and/or cost approaches. The fair value model establishes a hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy increases the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and related disclosures by maximizing the use of observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:
 
  •  Level 1 — Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include corporate equity, U.S. Treasury and money market securities. Valuation of these instruments does not require a high degree of judgment as the valuations are based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly available.
 
  •  Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable as of the measurement date, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include certificates of deposit, term deposits, corporate debt securities and Canadian government obligations. These financial instruments are valued by quoted prices that are less frequent than those in active markets or by models that use various assumptions that are derived from or supported by data that is generally observable in the marketplace. Valuations in this category are inherently less reliable than quoted market prices due to the degree of subjectivity involved in determining appropriate methodologies and the applicable underlying assumptions.
 
  •  Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and not corroborated by market data. The Company does not currently have any financial instruments utilizing Level 3 inputs. These financial instruments have significant inputs that cannot be validated by readily determinable data and generally involve considerable judgment by management.
 
See Note 4 to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of the financial assets carried at fair value.
 
Software development
 
Costs associated with software developed for internal use are capitalized based on the applicable guidance in the FASB Codification Capitalized costs include external direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use software and payroll for employees directly associated with, and who devote time to, the development of the internal-use software. Costs incurred in development and enhancement of software that do not meet the capitalization criteria, such as costs of activities performed during the preliminary and post- implementation stages, are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in development and enhancements that do not meet


32


Table of Contents

the criteria to capitalize are activities performed during the application development stage such as designing, coding, installing and testing. The critical estimate related to this process is the determination of the amount of time devoted by employees to specific stages of internal-use software development projects. We review any impairment of the capitalized costs on a periodic basis.
 
Stock-based compensation
 
The Company’s accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for employee services, and carries forward prior guidance for share-based payments for transactions with non-employees. Under the modified prospective transition method, the Company is required to recognize compensation cost, after the effective date, for the portion of all previously granted awards that were not vested, and the vested portion of all new stock option grants and restricted stock. The compensation cost is based upon the original grant-date fair market value of the grant. The Company recognizes expense relating to stock-based compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period which is generally the vesting period. Forfeitures of unvested stock grants are estimated and recognized as reduction of expense.
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
This report contains forward-looking statements that may not be based on current or historical fact. Though we believe our expectations to be accurate, forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include but are not limited to:
 
  •  interest rate fluctuations;
 
  •  general economic conditions and the effect of economic conditions on consumer confidence;
 
  •  reduced margin loan balances maintained by our customers;
 
  •  fluctuations in overall market trading volume;
 
  •  our inability to successfully implement new product offerings;
 
  •  reductions in per transaction clearing fees;
 
  •  legislative and regulatory changes;
 
  •  our ability to attract and retain customers and key personnel; and
 
  •  those risks detailed from time to time in our press releases and periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
Additional important factors that may cause our actual results to differ from our projections are detailed later in this report under the section entitled “Risk Factors.” You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement.
 
Item 3.   Quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk
 
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2007, we did not have material exposure to reductions in the targeted federal funds rate. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007 there were significant decreases in these rates. We encountered a 50 basis point decrease in the federal funds rate in the fourth quarter of 2007. Actual rates fell approximately 400 basis points during 2008, to a federal funds rate of approximately .25% as of December 31, 2008, which is the current rate as of September 30, 2009. Based upon the September quarter average customer balances, assuming no increase, and adjusting for the timing of these rate reductions, we believe that each 25 basis point increase or decrease will affect pretax income by approximately $1 million per quarter. Despite such interest rate changes, we do not have material exposure to commodity price changes or similar market risks. Accordingly, we have not


33


Table of Contents

entered into any derivative contracts to mitigate such risk. In addition, we do not maintain material inventories of securities for sale, and therefore are not subject to equity price risk.
 
We extend margin credit and leverage to our correspondents and their customers, which is subject to various regulatory and clearing firm margin requirements. Margin credit is collateralized by cash and securities in the customers’ accounts. Our directors and executive officers and their associates, including family members, from time to time may be or may have been indebted to one or more of our operating subsidiaries or one of their respective correspondents or introducing brokers, as customers, in connection with margin account loans. Such indebtedness is in the ordinary course of business, is on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unaffiliated third parties who are not our employees and does not involve a more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Leverage involves securing a large potential future obligation with a proportional amount of cash or securities. The risks associated with margin credit and leverage increase during periods of fast market movements or in cases where leverage or collateral is concentrated and market movements occur. During such times, customers who utilize margin credit or leverage and who have collateralized their obligations with securities may find that the securities have a rapidly depreciating value and may not be sufficient to cover their obligations in the event of liquidation.
 
We are also exposed to credit risk when our correspondents’ customers execute transactions, such as short sales of options and equities, which can expose them to risk beyond their invested capital. We are indemnified and held harmless by our correspondents from certain liabilities or claims, the use of margin credit, leverage and short sales of their customers. However, if our correspondents do not have sufficient regulatory capital to cover such problems, we may be exposed to significant off-balance sheet risk in the event that collateral requirements are not sufficient to fully cover losses that customers may incur and those customers and their correspondents fail to satisfy their obligations. Our account level margin credit and leverage requirements meet or exceed those required by Regulation T of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, or similar regulatory requirements in other jurisdictions. The SEC and other self-regulated organizations (’SROs”) have approved new rules permitting portfolio margining that have the effect of permitting increased leverage on securities held in portfolio margin accounts relative to non-portfolio accounts. We began offering portfolio margining to our clients in 2007. We intend to continue to meet or exceed any account level margin credit and leverage requirements mandated by the SEC, other SROs, or similar regulatory requirements in other jurisdictions as we expand the offering of portfolio margining to our clients.
 
The profitability of our margin lending activities depends to a great extent on the difference between interest income earned on margin loans and investments of customer cash and the interest expense paid on customer cash balances and borrowings. If short-term interest rates fall, we generally expect to receive a smaller gross interest spread, causing the profitability of our margin lending and other interest-sensitive revenue sources to decline. Short-term interest rates are highly sensitive to factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory authorities. In particular, decreases in the federal funds rate by the Federal Reserve System usually lead to decreasing interest rates in the U.S., which generally lead to a decrease in the gross spread we earn. This is most significant when the federal funds rate is on the low end of its historical range, as is the case now. Interest rates in Canada and Europe are also subject to fluctuations based on governmental policies and economic factors and these fluctuations could also affect the profitability of our margin lending operations in these markets.
 
Given the volatility of exchange rates, we may not be able to manage our currency transaction and/or translation risks effectively, or volatility in currency exchange rates may expose our financial condition or results of operations to a significant additional risk.
 
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures
 
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no changes in our internal controls or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2009.


34


Table of Contents

 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings
 
In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc. is a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case filed on August 17, 2007 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois by Sentinel Management Group, Inc., a registered futures commission merchant (“Sentinel”). Prior to the filing of this action, Penson GHCO and PFFI held customer segregated accounts with Sentinel totaling approximately $36 million. Sentinel subsequently sold certain securities to Citadel Equity Fund, Ltd. and Citadel Limited Partnership. On August 20, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court authorized distributions of 95 percent of the proceeds Sentinel received from the sale of those securities to certain FCM clients of Sentinel, including Penson GHCO. This distribution to the Penson GHCO and PFFI customer segregated accounts along with a distribution received immediately prior to the bankruptcy filing totaled approximately $25.4 million.
 
On May 12, 2008, a committee of Sentinel creditors, consisting of a majority of non-FCM creditors, together with the trustee appointed to manage the affairs and liquidation of Sentinel (the “Sentinel Trustee”), filed with the Court their proposed Plan of Liquidation (the “Committee Plan”) and on May 13, 2008 filed a Disclosure Statement related thereto. The Committee Plan allows the Sentinel Trustee to seek the return from FCMs, including Penson GHCO and PFFI, of a portion of the funds previously distributed to their customer segregated accounts. On June 19, 2008, the Court entered an order approving the Disclosure Statement over objections by Penson GHCO and others. On September 16, 2008, the Sentinel Trustee filed suit against Penson GHCO and PFFI along with several other FCMs that received distributions to their customer segregated accounts from Sentinel. The suit against Penson GHCO and PFFI seeks the return of approximately $23.6 million of post-bankruptcy petition transfers and $14.4 million of pre-bankruptcy petition transfers. The suit also seeks to declare that the funds distributed to the customer segregated accounts of Penson GHCO and PFFI by Sentinel are the property of the Sentinel bankruptcy estate rather than the property of customers of Penson GHCO and PFFI.
 
On December 15, 2008, over the objections of Penson GHCO and PFFI, the court entered an order confirming the Committee Plan, and the Committee Plan became effective on December 17, 2008. On January 7, 2009 Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their answer and affirmative defenses to the suit brought by the Sentinel Trustee. Also on January 7, 2009, Penson GHCO, PFFI and a number of other FCMs that had placed customer funds with Sentinel filed motions to withdraw the reference with the federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois, effectively asking the federal district court to remove the Sentinel suits against the FCMs from the bankruptcy court and consolidate them with other Sentinel related actions pending in the federal district court. On April 8, 2009, the Sentinel Trustee filed an amended complaint, which added a claim for unjust enrichment. Penson GHCO and PFFI’s response seeking to dismiss this claim was filed on May 8, 2009. On June 30, 2009, the Court denied the motion to dismiss without prejudice. The Court also held a preliminary pretrial hearing on June 30, 2009, and ordered that the first trial of the Sentinel Trustee’s claims against one FCM would commence on July 6, 2010, and the thirteen remaining trials would be scheduled at one month intervals thereafter. The trial of the Sentinel Trustee’s claims against Penson GHCO and PFFI is tentatively scheduled to proceed from September 20-23, 2010.
 
On July 31, 2009, Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order denying their motion to dismiss the unjust enrichment claim. On September 1, 2009, the Court denied the motion for reconsideration without prejudice. On September 11, 2009, Penson GHCO and PFFI filed their amended answer and amended affirmative defenses to the Sentinel Trustee’s amended complaint. On October 28, 2009, the federal district court for the Northern District of Illinois granted Penson GHCO, PFFI, and certain other FCM’s motions requesting removal of the matters referenced above from the bankruptcy court, thereby removing these matters to the federal district court. While the trial schedule referenced above is still pending, it may change given the granting of the motions removing these matters to the federal district court.
 
The Company believes that the Court was correct in ordering the prior distributions and Penson GHCO and PFFI intend to continue to vigorously defend their position. However, there can be no assurance that any actions by Penson GHCO or PFFI will result in a limitation or avoidance of potential repayment liabilities. In the event that Penson GHCO and PFFI are obligated to return all previously distributed funds to the Sentinel Estate, any losses the


35


Table of Contents

Company might suffer would most likely be partially mitigated as it is likely that Penson GHCO and PFFI would share in the funds ultimately disbursed by the Sentinel Estate.
 
Various Claimants v. Penson Financial Services, Inc., et al. On July 18, 2006, three claimants filed separate arbitration claims with the NASD (which is now known as FINRA) against PFSI related to the sale of certain collateralized mortgage obligations by SAMCO Financial Services, Inc. (“SAMCO Financial”), a former correspondent of PFSI, to its customers. In the ensuing months, additional arbitration claims were filed against PFSI and certain of our directors and officers based upon substantially similar underlying facts. These claims generally allege, among other things, that SAMCO Financial, in its capacity as broker, and PFSI, in its capacity as the clearing broker, failed to adequately supervise certain registered representatives of SAMCO Financial, and otherwise acted improperly in connection with the sale of these securities during the time period from approximately June 2004 to May 2006. Claimants have generally requested compensation for losses incurred through the depreciation in market value or liquidation of the collateralized mortgage obligations, interest on any losses suffered, punitive damages, court costs and attorneys’ fees. In addition to the arbitration claims, on March 21, 2008, Ward Insurance Company, Inc., et al, filed a claim against PFSI and Roger J. Engemoen, Jr., the Company’s Chairman of the Board, in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, Central District, based upon substantially similar facts. This case was filed after a FINRA arbitration panel had previously ruled against the claimant on substantially similar facts, but in that action, PFSI and Mr. Engemoen were not parties. Among other defenses asserted, the Company is seeking to have the court enforce the earlier arbitration panel determination.
 
Mr. Engemoen, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, is the Chairman of the Board, and beneficially owns approximately 49% of the outstanding stock, of SAMCO Holdings, Inc., the holding company of SAMCO Financial and SAMCO Capital Markets, Inc. (SAMCO Holdings, Inc. and its affiliated companies are referred to as the “SAMCO Entities”). Certain of the SAMCO Entities received certain assets from the Company when those assets were split-off immediately prior to the Company’s initial public offering in 2006 (the “Split-Off”). In connection with the Split-Off and through contractual and other arrangements, certain of the SAMCO Entities have agreed to indemnify the Company and its affiliates against liabilities that were incurred by any of the SAMCO Entities in connection with the operation of their businesses, either prior to or following the Split-Off. During the third quarter of 2008, the Company’s management determined that, based on the financial condition of the SAMCO Entities, sufficient risk existed with respect to the indemnification protections to warrant a modification of these arrangements with the SAMCO Entities, as described below.
 
On November 5, 2008, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with certain of the SAMCO Entities pursuant to which the Company received a limited personal guaranty from Mr. Engemoen of certain of the indemnification obligations of various SAMCO Entities with respect to claims related to the underlying facts described above, and, in exchange, the Company agreed to limit the aggregate indemnification obligations of the SAMCO Entities with respect to certain matters described above to $2,965,243. Unpaid indemnification obligations of $800,000 were satisfied prior to February 15, 2009. Of the $800,000 obligation, $86,000 was satisfied through a setoff against an obligation owed to the SAMCO Entities by PFSI, with the balance paid in cash. Of the remaining $2,165,243 indemnity obligation, $600,000 was paid to the Company prior to June 15, 2009 and the remainder is to be paid no later than December 31, 2009. Mr. Engemoen has guaranteed the payment of these obligations up to an aggregate of $2.0 million, within thirty (30) days of any default by the SAMCO Entities of their obligations under the settlement agreement. In addition to the above stated liabilities, the SAMCO Entities will also be responsible for any costs associated with collection under the foregoing settlement agreement together with any interest accrued on any past due amounts, and Mr. Engemoen will be responsible for any additional costs associated with collection under his guaranty together with any interest accrued on any past due amounts. The SAMCO Entities will remain responsible for the payment of their own defense costs and any claims from any third parties not expressly released under the settlement agreement, irrespective of amounts paid to indemnify the Company. The settlement agreement only relates to the matters described above and does not alter the indemnification obligations of the SAMCO Entities with respect to unrelated matters.
 
In the event the exposure of the Company with respect to these claims exceeds the agreed limits on the indemnification obligations of the SAMCO Entities and the guaranty of Mr. Engemoen, such excess amounts may be borne by the Company. While we believe we have good defenses, there can be no assurance that our defenses and indemnification protections will be sufficient to avoid all liabilities. Accordingly, to account for liabilities related to


36


Table of Contents

the aforementioned claims that may be borne by the Company, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $2.35 million in the third quarter of 2008. The Company will continue to monitor its financial exposure with respect to these matters and there can be no assurance that the Company’s ultimate costs with respect to these claims will not exceed the amount of this reserve.
 
In the general course of business, the Company and certain of its officers have been named as defendants in other various pending lawsuits and arbitration and regulatory proceedings. These other claims allege violation of federal and state securities laws, among other matters. The Company believes that resolution of these claims will not result in any material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, or results of operation.
 
Item 1A.   Risk Factors
 
Recent market instability could negatively affect our operations and financial condition.
 
As a financial services provider, our business is sensitive to conditions in the global financial markets and economic conditions generally, as well as to the soundness of particular financial services institutions with which we transact business. Among other things, national and international markets have continued through the third quarter of 2009 to suffer significant turmoil caused by a sharp downturn in markets for mortgage-related securities and non-investment grade debt securities and loans. Several large financial institutions including, without limitation, commercial banks, insurance companies, and brokerage firms, have either filed for bankruptcy or been the subject of governmental intervention in the form of loans, equity infusions or direct government ownership in receivership. Others have been sold in whole or in part to third parties. Financial services institutions that deal with each other are often interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. As a result, a default or failure by, or even concerns about the stability or liquidity of, one or more financial services institutions could lead to significant market-wide liquidity problems, or losses or defaults by other institutions, including us. In addition, our operations may suffer to the extent that ongoing market volatility causes individuals and institutional traders and other market participants to curtail or forego trading activities, which could adversely affect our operations and financial conditions.
 
Our inability to obtain credit on favorable terms could significantly restrict our business activities
 
Our $100.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility is currently scheduled to expire in April 2010. There is no guarantee that we will be able to renew or amend this credit facility, obtain a new senior secured credit facility or otherwise obtain credit from an alternative source on favorable terms. Failure to renew or amend our existing credit facility or obtain suitable alternative funding may significantly curtail our business activities, which will have a materially adverse effect on our financial condition.
 
Covenants in our credit agreement will restrict our business
 
Our senior secured revolving credit facility includes various covenants that limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions. These covenants limit our ability to, among other things: incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends on our capital stock or redeem, repurchase or retire our capital stock or prepay certain indebtedness, make investments, make capital expenditures, engage in certain transactions with our affiliates, enter into acquisitions, consolidate, merge or sell assets, incur liens and change the business conducted by us and our subsidiaries.
 
In addition, although we have recently amended our senior secured revolving credit facility to provide more flexibility with respect to certain covenants, the facility contains covenants that require us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Our ability to meet those financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond our control, and we may not be able to meet those tests at all. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under such credit facility. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under such senior secured revolving credit facility, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under such credit facility to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If the lenders under our senior secured revolving credit facility accelerated the repayment of borrowings, we may not have sufficient assets to repay the amounts outstanding thereunder which could have a material adverse effect on us.


37


Table of Contents

In addition to the other information set forth in this report and the risk factors discussed above, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2009, which could materially affect our business operations, financial condition or future results. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business operations and/or financial condition.
 
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
On December 6, 2007, our Board of Directors authorized us to purchase up to $12.5 million of our common stock in open market purchases and privately negotiated transactions. The plan is set to expire after $12.5 million of our common stock is purchased. No shares were repurchased under this plan in the third quarter of 2009. The following table sets forth the repurchases we made during the three months ended September 30, 2009:
 
                                 
                Total Number of
       
                Shares Purchased as
    Maximum Number of
 
          Average Price
    Part of Publicly
    Shares that May Yet be
 
    Total Number of
    Paid
    Announced Plans or
    Purchased under the
 
Period
  Shares Repurchased(a)     per Share     Program     Plans or Programs(b)  
 
July
    10,272     $ 9.12             514,106  
August
    6,880       10.14             462,392  
September
    1,948       9.90             473,601  
                                 
Total
    19,100     $ 9.57                
                                 
 
 
(a) Includes shares withheld to cover tax-withholding requirements relating to the vesting of restricted stock units issued to employees pursuant to the Company’s shareholder-approved stock incentive plan.
 
(b) Remaining shares represent the remaining dollar amount authorized divided by the average purchase price in the month.
 
Item 3.   Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
None reportable
 
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
None reportable
 
Item 5.   Other Information
 
None reportable


38


Table of Contents

Item 6.   Exhibits
 
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
 
                 
Exhibit
      Method of
Numbers
 
Description
 
Filing
 
  10 .1   Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated the     (1)  
        22nd day of September, 2009, by and among the Company, Regions Bank, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer, the lenders party thereto and the other parties thereto.        
  31 .1   Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our principal executive officer     (2)  
  31 .2   Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our principal financial officer     (2)  
  32 .1   Section 1350 Certification by our principal executive officer     (2)  
  32 .2   Section 1350 Certification by our principal financial officer     (2)  
 
 
(1) Filed herewith.


39


Table of Contents

 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
Penson Worldwide, Inc.
 
   
/s/  Philip A. Pendergraft
Philip A. Pendergraft
Chief Executive Officer
and principal executive officer
 
Date: November 6, 2009
 
/s/  Kevin W. McAleer
Kevin W. McAleer
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and principal financial and accounting officer
 
Date: November 6, 2009


40


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 
                 
Exhibit
      Method of
Numbers
 
Description
 
Filing
 
  10 .1   Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated the 22nd day of September, 2009, by and among the Company, Regions Bank, as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer, the lenders party thereto and the other parties thereto.     (1)  
  31 .1   Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our principal executive officer     (2)  
  31 .2   Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by our principal financial officer     (2)  
  32 .1   Section 1350 Certification by our principal executive officer     (2)  
  32 .2   Section 1350 Certification by our principal financial officer     (2)  
 
 
(1) Filed herewith.


41