Attached files
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR
THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _____________ TO ______________
Commission
File Number: 1-10006
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
75-1301831
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
1145
Empire Central Place
Dallas,
Texas 75247-4305
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(214)
630-8090
(Registrant's
telephone number,
including
area code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (l) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ý
Yes o
No
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o
Yes o No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
Filer ý
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
Reporting Company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes
ý No
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common
Stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
Number
of Shares Outstanding
|
|||
Common
stock, $1.50 par value
|
17,208,460
at October 30, 2009
|
INDEX
PART
I Financial Information
|
Page
No.
|
|
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheets (unaudited)
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
1
|
|
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Operations (unaudited)
Three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
Nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
5
|
|
Item
2
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
8
|
Item
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
25
|
Item
4
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
25
|
PART IIOther
Information
|
||
Item
1
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
26
|
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors
|
26
|
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
26
|
Item
3
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
26
|
Item
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
26
|
Item
5
|
Other
Information
|
26
|
Item
6
|
Exhibits
|
27
|
Signatures
|
28
|
|
Exhibit
Index
|
29
|
Item 1. Financial
Statements
Frozen
Food Express Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Condensed Balance Sheets
(Unaudited
and in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Assets
|
September
30, 2009
|
December 31, 2008
|
||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
2,670
|
$
|
1,308
|
||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
43,622
|
52,749
|
||||||
Tires
on equipment in use, net
|
5,632
|
5,425
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,491
|
2,666
|
||||||
Property
and equipment held for sale
|
1,019
|
-
|
||||||
Other
current assets
|
9,075
|
10,822
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
63,509
|
72,970
|
||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
74,555
|
83,394
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
5,058
|
5,822
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
143,122
|
$
|
162,186
|
||||
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
20,379
|
$
|
21,148
|
||||
Insurance
and claims accruals
|
9,628
|
7,736
|
||||||
Accrued
payroll and deferred compensation
|
5,367
|
4,396
|
||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,716
|
1,760
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
37,090
|
35,040
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
6,585
|
14,235
|
||||||
Insurance
and claims accruals
|
7,176
|
6,460
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
50,851
|
55,735
|
||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $1.50 par value per share; 75,000 shares
|
||||||||
authorized;
18,572 shares issued
|
27,858
|
27,858
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
2,625
|
|
5,412
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
72,739
|
87,103
|
||||||
103,222
|
120,373
|
|||||||
Treasury
stock (1,441 and 1,813 shares), at cost
|
(10,951
|
)
|
(13,922
|
)
|
||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
92,271
|
106,451
|
||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$
|
143,122
|
$
|
162,186
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements.
1
Frozen
Food Express Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Operations
(Unaudited
and in thousands, except per-share amounts)
Three
Months
Ended
September 30,
|
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
94,500
|
$
|
132,451
|
$
|
281,602
|
$
|
378,206
|
||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Salaries,
wages and related expenses
|
30,306
|
33,693
|
94,115
|
96,524
|
||||||||||||
Purchased
transportation
|
20,246
|
29,517
|
61,752
|
93,141
|
||||||||||||
Fuel
|
17,132
|
32,130
|
46,251
|
88,694
|
||||||||||||
Supplies
and maintenance
|
11,486
|
14,047
|
35,874
|
39,864
|
||||||||||||
Revenue
equipment rent
|
9,431
|
9,005
|
29,386
|
25,734
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
4,303
|
4,684
|
13,296
|
14,183
|
||||||||||||
Claims
and insurance
|
3,215
|
2,733
|
10,934
|
9,001
|
||||||||||||
Communications
and utilities
|
1,323
|
1,410
|
3,898
|
3,636
|
||||||||||||
Operating
taxes and licenses
|
1,076
|
1,163
|
3,656
|
3,431
|
||||||||||||
Loss
(gain) on sale of property and equipment
|
177
|
(491
|
)
|
(75
|
)
|
(1,096
|
)
|
|||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
638
|
1,000
|
2,367
|
3,234
|
||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
99,333
|
128,891
|
301,454
|
376,346
|
||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
(4,833
|
)
|
3,560
|
(19,852
|
)
|
1,860
|
||||||||||
Interest
and other (income) expense
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
(1
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
(66
|
)
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
5
|
74
|
9
|
110
|
||||||||||||
Equity
in earnings of limited partnership
|
(313
|
)
|
(200
|
)
|
(472
|
)
|
(511
|
)
|
||||||||
Other
|
106
|
200
|
591
|
(108
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Total
interest and other (income) expense
|
(203
|
)
|
62
|
123
|
(575
|
)
|
||||||||||
Pre-tax
income (loss)
|
(4,630
|
)
|
3,498
|
(19,975
|
)
|
2,435
|
||||||||||
Income
tax (benefit) expense
|
(2,070
|
)
|
2,141
|
(6,126
|
)
|
1,629
|
||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
(2,560
|
)
|
$
|
1,357
|
$
|
(13,849
|
)
|
$
|
806
|
||||||
Net
income (loss) per share of common stock
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
$
|
0.08
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
||||||
Diluted
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
$
|
0.08
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
17,149
|
16,737
|
17,069
|
16,699
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
|
17,149
|
17,027
|
17,069
|
16,998
|
||||||||||||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
0.03
|
$
|
0.03
|
$
|
0.09
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements.
2
Frozen
Food Express Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited
and in thousands)
Nine
Months
Ended
September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(13,849
|
)
|
$
|
806
|
|||
Non-cash
items included in net (loss) income
|
||||||||
Gain
on sale of property and equipment
|
(75
|
)
|
(1,754
|
)
|
||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
16,831
|
17,568
|
||||||
Provision
for losses on accounts receivable
|
216
|
922
|
||||||
Deferred
income tax
|
(6,475
|
)
|
822
|
|||||
Deferred
compensation
|
172
|
220
|
||||||
Investment
loss (income), net
|
210
|
(380
|
)
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
9,195
|
(11,852
|
)
|
|||||
Tires
on equipment in use
|
(3,112
|
)
|
(3,038
|
)
|
||||
Other
current assets
|
1,636
|
4,042
|
||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(1,617
|
)
|
(686
|
)
|
||||
Insurance
and claims accruals
|
2,608
|
(5,900
|
)
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities, payroll and other
|
776
|
2,247
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
6,516
|
3,017
|
||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Expenditures
for property and equipment
|
(12,395
|
)
|
(19,006
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
7,952
|
11,459
|
||||||
Other
|
(94
|
)
|
(252
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(4,537
|
)
|
(7,799
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from borrowings
|
21,100
|
68,000
|
||||||
Payments
against borrowings
|
(21,100
|
)
|
(62,200
|
)
|
||||
Dividends
paid
|
(515
|
)
|
(1,512
|
)
|
||||
Income
tax expense (benefit) of stock options and restricted
stock
|
(41
|
)
|
56
|
|||||
Proceeds
from capital stock transactions, net
|
96
|
424
|
||||||
Purchases
of treasury stock
|
(157
|
)
|
(216
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(617
|
)
|
4,552
|
|||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
1,362
|
(230
|
)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,308
|
2,473
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at September 30
|
$
|
2,670
|
$
|
2,243
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial
statements.
3
Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc.
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Condensed Statements of Shareholders' Equity
(Unaudited
and in thousands)
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Par
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Treasury
Stock
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued
|
Value
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Shares
|
Cost
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
January
1, 2008
|
18,572 | $ | 27,858 | $ | 5,682 | $ | 88,515 | 1,921 | $ | (14,796 | ) | $ | 107,259 | |||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 605 | - | - | 605 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
stock reacquired
|
- | - | - | - | 34 | (222 | ) | (222 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Retirement
plans
|
- | - | 3 | - | (4 | ) | 34 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
- | - | (443 | ) | - | (116 | ) | 894 | 451 | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
- | - | 277 | - | (22 | ) | 168 | 445 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
|
- | - | - | (2,017 | ) | - | - | (2,017 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit of stock options
|
- | - | (107 | ) | - | - | - | (107 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2008
|
18,572 | 27,858 | 5,412 | 87,103 | 1,813 | (13,922 | ) | 106,451 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (13,849 | ) | - | - | (13,849 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
stock reacquired
|
- | - | - | - | 38 | (157 | ) | (157 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Retirement
plans
|
- | - | (48 | ) | - | (4 | ) | 33 | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
- | - | (171 | ) | - | (35 | ) | 267 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted
stock
|
- | - | (2,527 | ) | - | (371 | ) | 2,828 | 301 | |||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
|
- | - | - | (515 | ) | - | - | (515 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefit of stock options
|
- | - | (41 | ) | - | - | - | (41 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
September
30, 2009
|
18,572 | $ | 27,858 | $ | 2,625 | $ | 72,739 | 1,441 | $ | (10,951 | ) | $ | 92,271 |
See
accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
Frozen
Food Express Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes
to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited)
1.
Basis of
Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements include
Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc., a Texas corporation, and our subsidiary
companies, all of which are wholly-owned (collectively, the
“Company”). Our statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) for interim financial
statements, and therefore do not include all information and disclosures
required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, such statements reflect all adjustments consisting of normal
recurring adjustments considered necessary to fairly present our consolidated
financial position, results of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows
for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for any interim
period do not necessarily indicate the results for the full year. The
unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements should be read
with reference to the consolidated financial statements and notes to
consolidated financial statements in our 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. All intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
2.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
and associated direct operating expenses are recognized on the date freight is
picked up from the shipper. One of the preferable methods outlined in
US GAAP provides for the recognition of revenue and direct costs when the
shipment is completed. Changing to this method would not have a
material impact on the quarterly financial results of operations of the
Company.
The
Company is the sole obligor with respect to the performance of our freight
services provided by independent contractors or through our brokerage business
and we assume all related credit risk. Accordingly, our revenue and the related
direct expenses are recognized on a gross basis on the date the freight is
picked up from the shipper. Revenue from equipment rental is
recognized ratably over the term of the associated rental
agreements.
3. Long-term
Debt
The
credit facility contains usual and customary covenants for transactions of this
type, including covenants limiting dividends and repurchases of shares of common
stock, liens, additional indebtedness and mergers. The Company will
be required to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the
Agreement, equal to or greater than 1.25 to 1.00 and a leverage ratio, as
defined in the Agreement, equal to or less than 2.50 to 1.00. In
addition, as of the last day of any fiscal quarter, the Company is required to
maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth, as defined in the Agreement,
of at least $85.0 million. The Credit Facility is secured by
substantially all of the assets of the Company and its affiliates.
On
November 4, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility
which reduced the amount available under the facility and modified certain
financial covenants as further disclosed in footnote No. 9.
5
4. Income
Taxes
Our
income is taxed in the United States of America and various state jurisdictions.
Our federal returns for 2005 and after are presently subject to further
examination by the Internal Revenue Service. State returns are filed
in most state jurisdictions, with varying statutes of limitations.
US GAAP
requires that, for interim periods, we project full-year income and permanent
differences between book income and taxable income in order to calculate an
effective tax rate for the entire year. That projected effective tax
rate is used to calculate our income tax provision or benefit for the interim
periods’ year-to-date financial results.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, our effective tax rate (income tax benefit
divided by pre-tax loss) was 30.7% compared to 66.9% for the same period a year
ago. The difference between our effective
tax rate and the federal statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily attributable to
state income taxes and non-deductible driver related expenses.
Basic and
diluted income (loss) per common share was computed as follows:
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(2,560
|
)
|
$
|
1,357
|
$
|
(13,849
|
)
|
$
|
806
|
||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic-weighted
average shares
|
17,149
|
16,737
|
17,069
|
16,699
|
||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive stock options
|
-
|
290
|
-
|
299
|
||||||||||||
Diluted-weighted
average shares
|
17,149
|
17,027
|
17,069
|
16,998
|
||||||||||||
Basic
income (loss) per common share
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
$
|
0.08
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
||||||
Diluted
income (loss) per common share
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
$
|
0.08
|
$
|
(0.81
|
)
|
$
|
0.05
|
Options totaling 607,000 and 739,000 shares were outstanding but were not
included in the calculation of diluted weighted average shares for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, as their exercise prices
were greater than the average market price of the common shares. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, options totaling 589,000 and
553,000 shares, respectively, were outstanding but are not included in the
calculation of diluted weighted average shares as their exercise prices were
greater than the average market price of the common shares. The
Company excluded all common stock equivalents in 2009 as the effect was
anti-dilutive due to the net loss.
On January 1, 2009 the Company adopted
the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 260, Earnings Per Share, related
to determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions
are participating securities. Under the provisions, unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents are considered participating securities and are included in
the computation of both basic and diluted earnings per share. The
Company restated prior periods’ basic and diluted earnings per share outstanding
calculation. Upon adoption, there was no change in basic and diluted
income per share for the third quarter or first nine months of
2008.
6
6. Related
Party Transactions
The
Company purchases most of the trailers and trailer refrigeration units we use in
our operations from W&B Service Company, L.P. (“W&B”), an entity in
which we own a 19.9% equity interest, and also relies upon W&B to provide
routine maintenance and warranty repair of the trailers and refrigeration
units. The Company accounts for that investment under the equity
method of accounting.
During
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company purchased
$91,000 and $2.3 million, respectively, in trailers and refrigeration units from
W&B. During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, we paid W&B $1.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for
maintenance and repair services, accessories, and parts. As of
September 30, 2009 and 2008, our accounts payable included amounts owed to
W&B of $318,000 and $330,000, respectively, for the purchase of parts and
repair services.
7.
Commitments and
Contingencies
The
Company is involved in legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of
business. Although the outcomes of any such legal actions cannot be
predicted, in the opinion of management, the resolution of any currently pending
or threatened actions will not have a material adverse effect upon our financial
position or results of operations. During 2008, the Company settled a
class action lawsuit and a derivative action without significant financial
consideration which was approved by the Court in April, 2009. The
derivative action requires the Company to make certain corporate governance
changes beginning in early March 2009. The Company made the majority
of these changes and anticipates completion by December 31, 2009.
The
Company accrues for costs related to public liability, cargo, employee health
insurance and work-related injury claims. When a loss occurs, we record a
reserve for the estimated outcome. As additional information becomes available,
adjustments are made. Accrued claims liabilities include all such reserves and
our estimate for incidents that have been incurred but not
reported.
8. Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Effective July 1, 2009, the Company
adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (ASC
105), (formerly SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). This standard
establishes only two levels of US GAAP, authoritative and nonauthoritative. The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) became the source of
authoritative, nongovernmental US GAAP, except for rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative US GAAP for SEC
registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not
included in the Codification became nonauthoritative. The Company began using
the new guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the Codification when
referring to US GAAP in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. As the Codification
was not intended to change or alter existing US GAAP, it did not have any impact
on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
9. Subsequent
Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent
events after the balance sheet date of September 30,2009 through November 6,
2009, which is the date the accompanying financial statements were
issued. Other than as described below, the Company is not aware of
any subsequent events that would require recognition or disclosure in the
consolidated financial statements.
7
On November 4, 2009 the Company entered
into an amendment to the Credit Facility to reduce the amount of available
credit from $35.0 million to $25.0 million to better align the size of the
facility to the underlying borrowing base, increase the allowable funded debt to
EBITDAR, decrease the required EBITDAR (as defined in the Credit Facility) to
fixed charges and to decrease the minimum tangible net worth based upon the
following periods:
Periods
Ending
|
EBITDAR
to Fixed Charges
|
Funded
Debt to EBITDAR
|
(in
thousands)
Minimum
Tangible Net Worth
|
|||||
October
2009 – November 2009
|
1.05:1.0 | 2.75:1.0 | $ | 85,000 | ||||
December
2009 – February 2010
|
1.05:1.0
|
2.75:1.0
|
|
80,000
|
||||
March
2010 – May 2010
|
1.10:1.0
|
2.75:1.0
|
80,000
|
|||||
June
2010 – August 2010
|
1.20:1.0
|
2.75:1.0
|
75,000
|
|||||
Subsequent
to August 2010
|
1.25:1.0
|
2.50:1.0
|
75,000
|
The
amendment also reduces the allowable net expenditures for property and equipment
during any twelve month period from $25.0 million to $12.5 million, reduces the
available expenditures for acquisitions from $10.0 million to $3.5 million in
any fiscal year and changes the interest rate spread over the London Interbank
Offered Rate based upon achieving various EBITDAR to fixed charges
ratios.
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited
consolidated condensed financial statements and our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. This discussion and analysis
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors,
including, but not limited to, those included in our Form 10-K, Part I, Item 1A
for the year ended December 31, 2008. We do not assume, and
specifically disclaim, any obligation to update any forward-looking statement
contained in this report.
OVERVIEW
U.S.
economic conditions declined throughout calendar 2008, accelerating in the
second half of the calendar year with a sharp decline in the general
economy. The economic and national news reports during 2009 reported
further economic challenges caused by increasing unemployment, decreased
consumer confidence and spending, continued strain on the financial sector and
credit markets, growing housing foreclosures, declining construction, continued
government and municipal budget challenges, tax revenue declines and continuing
reports of declines in corporate revenues and profits.
8
As we
report our third quarter ended September 30, 2009, the U.S. economy remains
weak, which results in less shipping of goods. Therefore,
transportation companies continue to face adverse economic
pressures. Throughout 2009, we continue to be negatively impacted by
the economic downturn, which is driving lower demand for transportation services
and creating excess capacity. This, in turn, is placing negative
pressure on pricing in the industry. We continue to experience
revenue and profit challenges we believe are the result of the weakened economy,
increased unemployment and changes in consumer buying habits. While
our results reflect these revenue and profit challenges, we continue to take
steps to reduce our cost structure while focusing on initiatives to increase
volume and margins.
Given the
volatile trends and uncertain economic conditions, we have limited ability to
forecast our fiscal 2009 consolidated operating and financial
results. While there are many significant factors that we cannot
control, we intend to navigate the present general economic downturn by
remaining focused on improving areas within our control and on achieving further
progress on three primary goals: maintaining a strong balance sheet,
identifying revenue and cost reduction opportunities, and positioning our
business to capitalize on the U.S. economic recovery when it
occurs. Consistent with these goals we: (i) ended the first, second
and third quarters with no amounts outstanding under our revolving credit
agreement; (ii) implemented a cost reduction initiative to reduce operating
costs including staffing reductions, elimination of the Company’s 401(k)
matching program, reduction of driver recruiting costs, reduction of non-driver
work hours and elimination of discretionary spending; and (iii) implemented
specific sales and service initiatives with our existing and new
customers. Our key business strategies and plans for the remainder of
fiscal 2009 and into fiscal 2010 will continue to reflect these
priorities.
We
generate our revenue from truckload, less-than-truckload (“LTL”), dedicated and
brokerage services we provide to our customers. Generally, we are
paid either by the mile, the weight or the number of trucks being utilized by
our dedicated service customers. We also derive revenue from fuel
surcharges, loading and unloading activities, equipment detention and other
ancillary services. The main factors that affect our revenue are the rate
per mile we receive from our customers, the percentage of miles for which we are
compensated and the number of miles we generate with our equipment. These
factors relate, among other things, to the United States economy, inventory
levels, the level of truck capacity in the transportation industry and specific
customer demand. We monitor our revenue production primarily through
average revenue per truck per week, net of fuel surcharges,
revenue-per-hundredweight for our LTL services, empty mile ratio, revenue per
loaded (and total) miles, the number of linehaul shipments, loaded miles per
shipment and the average weight per shipment.
For the third quarter of 2009 our operating revenue decreased by $38.0 million,
or 28.7%. Operating revenue, net of fuel surcharges, decreased $16.6
million, or 16.8%, to $82.0 million from $98.6 million in
2008. Excluding fuel surcharges, our average truckload
revenue-per-tractor-per-week decreased 13.7% primarily due to a decrease in our
loaded truckload revenue per mile from $1.48 to $1.41, an increase in our empty
mile ratio to 11.2% from 9.4%, a decrease in our intermodal business, a 13.7%
decline in our LTL hundredweight and a decrease in our LTL revenue per
hundredweight from $15.04 to $14.51. Although revenue per mile and
per hundredweight has declined from a year ago, the third quarter 2009 pricing
has increased over the second quarter of 2009, as we focus on our
margins. Our truckload revenue decreased by $9.7 million, or
15.8%. Due to continuing pricing pressures and excess capacity in the
freight industry, our truckload revenue per loaded mile decreased to $1.41 per
mile and our loaded truckload miles declined 9.7% when compared to our third
quarter 2008 results. Dedicated revenue decreased $2.1 million for
the quarter while brokerage revenue decreased $1.5 million for the
quarter.
9
Our
profitability on the expense side is impacted by variable costs of transporting
freight for our customers, fixed costs and expenses containing both fixed and
variable components. The variable costs include fuel expense,
driver-related expenses, such as wages, benefits, training, recruitment, and
independent contractor costs, which are recorded under purchased
transportation. Expenses that have both fixed and variable components
include maintenance and tire expense and our total cost of insurance and
claims. These expenses generally vary with the miles we drive, but also
have a controllable component based on safety, fleet age, efficiency and other
factors. Our main fixed costs relate to the acquisition and financing of
long-term assets, such as revenue equipment and service centers. Although
certain factors affecting our expenses are beyond our control, we monitor them
closely and attempt to anticipate changes in these factors in managing our
business. For example, fuel prices fluctuated dramatically and quickly at
various times during the last several years. We manage our exposure to changes
in fuel prices primarily through fuel surcharge programs with our customers, as
well as through volume fuel purchasing arrangements with national fuel centers
and bulk purchases of fuel at our service centers. To help further reduce
fuel expense, we purchase tractors with opti-idle technology, which monitors the
temperature of the cab and allows the engine to operate more efficiently while
not on the road.
Our
business requires substantial, ongoing capital investments, particularly for new
tractors and trailers. At September 30, 2009, we had no outstanding borrowings
under our credit facility and $92.3 million in shareholders’ equity. In
the third quarter of 2009, we added approximately $762,000 of property and
equipment, net of proceeds from dispositions, and recognized a loss of $177,000
on the disposition of used equipment. These capital expenditures were
funded with cash flows from operations. We estimate that capital
expenditures will range from $17.0 million to $20.0 million in 2009, which would
be higher than our historical levels due to our tractor replacement schedule and
the capital required to consolidate two of our facilities into one location in
New Jersey.
10
The
following table summarizes and compares the significant components of revenue
and presents our operating ratio and revenue per truck per week for each of the
three- and nine-month periods ended September 30:
Three
Months
|
Nine
Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Revenue
from: (a)
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||
Temperature-controlled
fleet
|
$
|
34,684
|
$
|
37,626
|
$
|
103,630
|
$
|
108,854
|
||||||||
Dry-freight
fleet
|
12,269
|
16,921
|
40,805
|
53,107
|
||||||||||||
Total
truckload linehaul services
|
46,953
|
54,547
|
144,435
|
161,961
|
||||||||||||
Dedicated
fleets
|
4,749
|
6,859
|
14,970
|
18,528
|
||||||||||||
Total
truckload
|
51,702
|
61,406
|
159,405
|
180,489
|
||||||||||||
Less-than-truckload
linehaul services
|
27,429
|
32,922
|
81,105
|
92,947
|
||||||||||||
Fuel
surcharges
|
12,492
|
33,864
|
32,065
|
90,124
|
||||||||||||
Brokerage
|
1,657
|
3,128
|
5,415
|
10,629
|
||||||||||||
Equipment
rental
|
1,220
|
1,131
|
3,612
|
4,017
|
||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
94,500
|
132,451
|
281,602
|
378,206
|
||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
99,333
|
128,891
|
301,454
|
376,346
|
||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
$
|
(4,833
|
)
|
$
|
3,560
|
$
|
(19,852
|
)
|
$
|
1,860
|
||||||
Operating
ratio (b)
|
105.1
|
%
|
97.3
|
%
|
107.0
|
%
|
99.5
|
%
|
||||||||
Total
truckload revenue
|
$
|
51,702
|
$
|
61,406
|
$
|
159,405
|
$
|
180,489
|
||||||||
Less-than-truckload revenue
|
27,429
|
32,922
|
81,105
|
92,947
|
||||||||||||
Total
linehaul and dedicated fleet revenue
|
$
|
79,131
|
$
|
94,328
|
$
|
240,510
|
$
|
273,436
|
||||||||
Weekly
average trucks
|
1,991
|
2,011
|
2,024
|
2,029
|
||||||||||||
Revenue
per truck per week (c)
|
$
|
3,024
|
$
|
3,569
|
$
|
3,047
|
$
|
3,443
|
Computational
notes:
|
|
Revenue
and expense amounts are stated in thousands of dollars.
|
|
(b)
|
Operating
expenses divided by total revenue.
|
(c)
|
Average
daily revenue, times seven, divided by weekly average
trucks.
|
11
Three
Months
|
Nine
Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Truckload
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||
Total
linehaul miles (a)
|
37,549
|
40,736
|
115,628
|
123,124
|
||||||||||||
Loaded
miles (a)
|
33,352
|
36,926
|
104,040
|
111,989
|
||||||||||||
Empty
mile ratio (b)
|
11.2
|
%
|
9.4
|
%
|
10.0
|
%
|
9.0
|
%
|
||||||||
Linehaul
revenue per total mile (c)
|
$
|
1.25
|
$
|
1.34
|
$
|
1.25
|
$
|
1.32
|
||||||||
Linehaul
revenue per loaded mile (d)
|
$
|
1.41
|
$
|
1.48
|
$
|
1.39
|
$
|
1.45
|
||||||||
Linehaul
shipments (a)
|
39.8
|
39.0
|
117.4
|
115.1
|
||||||||||||
Loaded
miles per shipment (e)
|
838
|
946
|
886
|
973
|
||||||||||||
LTL
|
||||||||||||||||
Hundredweight
|
1,890,510
|
2,189,626
|
5,630,191
|
6,397,453
|
||||||||||||
Shipments
(a)
|
62.3
|
71.9
|
184.0
|
205.4
|
||||||||||||
Linehaul
revenue per hundredweight (f)
|
$
|
14.51
|
$
|
15.04
|
$
|
14.41
|
$
|
14.53
|
||||||||
Linehaul
revenue per shipment (g)
|
$
|
440
|
$
|
458
|
$
|
441
|
$
|
453
|
||||||||
Average
weight per shipment (h)
|
3,035
|
3,046
|
3,060
|
3,115
|
Computational
notes:
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts
are stated in thousands.
|
(b)
|
Total
truckload linehaul miles less truckload loaded miles, divided by total
truckload linehaul miles.
|
(c)
|
Revenue
from truckload linehaul services divided by total truckload linehaul
miles.
|
(d)
|
Revenue
from truckload linehaul services divided by truckload loaded
miles.
|
(e)
|
Total
truckload loaded miles divided by number of truckload linehaul
shipments.
|
(f)
|
LTL
revenue divided by LTL hundredweight.
|
(g)
|
LTL
revenue divided by number of LTL shipments.
|
(h)
|
LTL
hundredweight times one hundred divided by number of
shipments.
|
The
following table summarizes and compares the makeup of our fleets between
company-provided tractors and tractors provided by independent contractors as of
September 30:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Total
company-provided
|
1,591 | 1,614 | ||||||
Total
owner-operator
|
409 | 402 | ||||||
Total
tractors
|
2,000 | 2,016 | ||||||
Total
trailers
|
3,780 | 4,364 |
12
Comparison
of Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 to Three Months Ended September 30,
2008
The
following table sets forth revenue, operating income, operating ratios and
revenue per truck per week and the dollar and percentage changes of
each:
Revenue
from (a)
|
2009
|
2008
|
Dollar
Change
2009
vs. 2008
|
Percentage
Change
2009
vs. 2008
|
|||||||||||
Temperature-controlled
fleet
|
$
|
34,684
|
$
|
37,626
|
$
|
(2,942
|
)
|
(7.8
|
)
|
%
|
|||||
Dry-freight
fleet
|
12,269
|
16,921
|
(4,652
|
)
|
(27.5
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
truckload linehaul services
|
46,953
|
54,547
|
(7,594
|
)
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|||||||||
Dedicated
fleets
|
4,749
|
6,859
|
(2,110
|
)
|
(30.8
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
truckload
|
51,702
|
61,406
|
(9,704
|
)
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|||||||||
Less-than-truckload
linehaul services
|
27,429
|
32,922
|
(5,493
|
)
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|||||||||
Fuel
surcharges
|
12,492
|
33,864
|
(21,372
|
)
|
(63.1
|
)
|
|||||||||
Brokerage
|
1,657
|
3,128
|
(1,471
|
)
|
(47.0
|
)
|
|||||||||
Equipment
rental
|
1,220
|
1,131
|
89
|
7.9
|
|||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
94,500
|
132,451
|
(37,951
|
)
|
(28.7
|
)
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
99,333
|
128,891
|
(29,558
|
)
|
(22.9
|
)
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) income from operations
|
$
|
(4,833
|
)
|
$
|
3,560
|
$
|
(8,393
|
)
|
(235.8
|
)
|
%
|
||||
Operating
ratio (b)
|
105.1
|
%
|
97.3
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
truckload revenue
|
$
|
51,702
|
$
|
61,406
|
$
|
(9,704
|
)
|
(15.8
|
)
|
%
|
|||||
Less-than-truckload
revenue
|
27,429
|
32,922
|
(5,493
|
)
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
linehaul and dedicated fleet revenue
|
$
|
79,131
|
$
|
94,328
|
$
|
(15,197
|
)
|
(16.1
|
)
|
%
|
|||||
Weekly
average trucks
|
1,991
|
2,011
|
(20
|
)
|
(1.0
|
)
|
%
|
||||||||
Revenue
per truck per week (c)
|
$
|
3,024
|
$
|
3,569
|
$
|
(545
|
)
|
(15.3
|
)
|
%
|
Computational
notes:
|
|
(a)
|
Revenue
and expense amounts are stated in thousands of dollars.
|
(b)
|
Operating
expenses divided by total revenue.
|
(c)
|
Average
daily revenue, times seven, divided by weekly average trucks in
service.
|
Total
revenue decreased $38.0 million, or 28.7%, to $94.5 million in 2009 from $132.5
million in 2008. Excluding fuel surcharges, our revenue decreased
$16.6 million, or 16.8%, to $82.0 million from $98.6 million in
2008.
Truckload
revenue, excluding fuel surcharges, decreased $9.7 million, or 15.8%, to $51.7
million from $61.4 million in 2008. Truckload revenues declined
primarily due to continued pricing pressures and excess capacity in the industry
driving down loaded miles 9.7% to 33.4 million from 36.9 million in
2008. As a result, our empty mile ratio increased from 9.4% in 2008
to 11.2% in 2009, as we incurred more miles to generate our
volume. During 2008, the Company continued to focus on providing
services within our preferred networks; however, intermodal loads decreased to
optimize utility with our existing fleet. The Company continues to shift revenue
equipment between its truckload and less-than-truckload operations to optimize
its fleet. Due to the challenging freight environment, our ability to
increase truckload rates was limited throughout 2008 and into
2009. Our revenue per loaded mile declined to $1.41 in 2009 from
$1.48 in 2008; however, it increased over that of the second quarter of
2009.
Our dry
fleet revenue has declined 27.5% during 2009 primarily due to a decline in total
tonnage shipped. Excess capacity within the transportation industry
resulted in increased competition for less available freight, which put downward
pressure on pricing.
13
Less-than-truckload
revenue decreased $5.5 million, or 16.7%, to $27.4 million from $32.9
million. The decline in revenue was primarily driven by a decline in
total weight shipped from fewer shipments. Total weight shipped for
the quarter declined 13.7% to 189.1 million pounds from 219.0 million pounds in
2008. Although the Company implemented a general rate increase during
mid-2008 and in the second quarter of 2009, these increases were largely offset
by other pricing pressures within the industry, which drove the rate to $14.51
in the third quarter of 2009 from $15.04 in the third quarter of
2008.
Fuel
surcharges represent the cost of fuel that we are able to pass along to our
customers based upon changes in the Department of Energy’s weekly
indices. The cost of fuel has decreased from the third quarter of
2008, resulting in decreased fuel surcharges of $21.4 million, or 63.1% for the
quarter. The lower fuel surcharge is offset by decreased fuel costs
to the Company within fuel and purchased transportation
expenses.
The
following table sets forth for the periods indicated the dollar and percentage
increase or decrease of the items in our consolidated condensed statements of
operations, and those items as a percentage of revenue:
(in
thousands)
Dollar
Change
|
Percentage
Change
|
Percentage
of Revenue
|
||||||||
2009
vs. 2008
|
2009
vs. 2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
(37,951
|
)
|
(28.7
|
)%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
||||||||||
Salaries,
wages and related expenses
|
(3,387
|
)
|
(10.1
|
)
|
32.1
|
25.4
|
||||
Purchased
transportation
|
(9,271
|
)
|
(31.4
|
)
|
21.4
|
22.3
|
||||
Fuel
|
(14,998
|
)
|
(46.7
|
)
|
18.1
|
24.3
|
||||
Supplies
and maintenance
|
(2,561
|
)
|
(18.2
|
)
|
12.2
|
10.6
|
||||
Revenue
equipment rent
|
426
|
4.7
|
10.0
|
6.8
|
||||||
Depreciation
|
(381
|
)
|
(8.1
|
)
|
4.6
|
3.5
|
||||
Claims
and insurance
|
482
|
17.6
|
3.4
|
2.1
|
||||||
Communications
and utilities
|
(87
|
)
|
(6.2
|
)
|
1.4
|
1.1
|
||||
Operating
taxes and licenses
|
(87
|
)
|
(7.5
|
)
|
1.1
|
0.9
|
||||
Gain
on sale of property and equipment
|
668
|
(136.0
|
)
|
0.2
|
(0.4
|
)
|
||||
Miscellaneous
|
(362
|
)
|
(36.2
|
)
|
0.6
|
0.7
|
||||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
$
|
(29,558
|
)
|
(22.9
|
)%
|
105.1
|
%
|
97.3
|
%
|
Total
operating expenses for 2009 decreased $29.6 million, or 22.9%, to $99.3 million
from $128.9 million in 2008. As a result of the decline in revenue
and the decrease in operating expenses, the operating ratio increased to 105.1%
from 97.3% in 2008.
Salaries,
wages and related expenses consist of compensation for our employees, including
drivers and non-drivers. It also includes employee-related costs,
including the costs of payroll taxes, work-related injuries, group health
insurance, 401(k) plan contributions and other fringe benefits. The
most variable of these salary, wage and related expenses is driver pay, which is
affected by the mix of company drivers and owner-operators in our fleets as well
as our efficiencies in our over-the-road operations. Driver salaries
including per diem costs decreased to $17.6 million from $19.6 million in 2008
primarily from a decrease in loaded miles. Non-driver salaries
decreased $1.6 million driven by a reduction in non-driver
headcount. Group health insurance costs increased by $207,000 due to
an increase in the quantity and severity of claims while work related injuries
increased as a result of an increase in both claim frequency and average claim
per visit.
14
Purchased
transportation expense consists of payments to independent contractors for the
equipment and services they provide, payments to other motor carriers who handle
our brokerage services and to various railroads for intermodal
services. It also includes fuel surcharges paid to our independent
contractors for which we charge our customers. These expenses are
highly variable with revenue and/or the mix of company drivers versus
independent contractors. Purchased transportation expense decreased
$9.3 million, or 31.4%, in 2009 from 2008. Purchased transportation
expense related to our intermodal service decreased by $2.2 million including
fuel surcharges, or 39.1%, compared to 2008 as our intermodal movements
declined. The portion of our purchased transportation connected with
our truckload and LTL services decreased $1.8 million, including fuel
surcharges, primarily reflecting a decrease in the number of independent
contractors utilized during the third quarter of 2009. Purchased
transportation associated with our brokerage services decreased $1.3 million, or
48.8%, compared to 2008, as the result of a similar decrease in brokerage
revenue. Fuel payments to our independent contractors decreased from
$6.7 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $2.7 million in the third quarter
of 2009 due to a decline in fuel surcharges and a decrease in our utilization of
independent contractors.
Fuel
expense and fuel taxes decreased by $15.0 million, or 46.7%, to $17.1 million
from $32.1 million in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a
40.1% decline in the Department of Energy’s Fuel Index and an improvement
in our miles per gallon resulting in fewer gallons consumed. We have
fuel surcharge provisions in substantially all of our transportation contracts
and attempt to recover a portion of fuel prices through fuel surcharges and
rates to our customers.
Supplies
and maintenance expenses primarily consist of repairs, maintenance and tires
along with load specific expenses including loading/unloading, tolls, pallets,
pickup and delivery and recruiting. Supplies and maintenance costs
decreased $2.6 million, or 18.2%, from 2008. The decrease was
primarily driven by lower fleet repairs and maintenance of $1.5 million
and lower recruiting costs of approximately $533,000, as fewer drivers were
recruited. Significant repairs to our equipment are generally covered by
manufacturers’ warranties.
Total
revenue equipment rent increased $426,000, or 4.7%, to $9.4 million from $9.0
million in 2008. The increase is primarily due to an increase in the
average number of tractors under lease at the end of September 2009 of 1,240
compared to 1,196 at the end of September 2008 and the increase in the average
cost of equipment as we replace older equipment with new equipment and as our
leased versus owned ratio increases. We expect equipment rent expense
to increase in future periods as a result of higher prices of new equipment and
our shift toward leased versus owned equipment.
Depreciation
relates to owned tractors, trailers, communications units, service centers and
other assets. Gains or losses on dispositions of revenue equipment are set forth
in a separate line item within our statements of
operations. Depreciation expense decreased $381,000, or 8.1%, as
older equipment was disposed and replaced with newer leased
equipment. Depreciation expense is also dependent upon the mix of
company-owned equipment versus independent contractors. We expect our
annual cost of tractor and trailer ownership will increase in future periods as
a result of higher prices of new equipment, which is expected to result in
greater depreciation. Future depreciation expense will be impacted by
our leasing decisions.
Claims
and insurance expenses consist of the costs of premiums for insurance
accruals we make within our self-insured retention amounts, primarily for
personal injury, property damage, physical damage and cargo
claims. These expenses will vary and are dependent on the frequency
and severity of accidents, our self-insured retention amounts and the insurance
market. Claims and insurance costs increased by $482,000, or 17.6%, to $3.2
million from $2.7 million in 2008. The increase was primarily due to
an increase in the severity of claims incurred. The Company is
responsible for the first $4.0 million on personal injury and property damage
liability claims and 25% of the claim amount between $4.0 million and $10.0
million. The Company has excess coverage from $10.0 million to $50.0
million. Our significant self-insured retention exposes us to the
possibility of significant fluctuations in claims expense between periods
depending on the frequency, severity and timing of claims and to adverse
financial results if we incur large or numerous losses. In the event
of an uninsured claim above our insurance coverage, a claim that approaches the
maximum self-insured retention level, or an increase in the frequency or
severity of claims within our self-insured retention, our financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
15
The
Company moved to an effective tax benefit rate of 44.7% in 2009 from an
effective tax rate of 61.2% in 2008. We pay our drivers a per-diem
allowance for travel related expenses for which we are only able to deduct 80%
for tax purposes. This, along with other non-deductible items for
tax, decreased our effective tax rate as we incurred a pre-tax loss in 2009
versus income in 2008.
As a
result of factors described above, our net loss was $2.6 million in 2009
compared to net income of $1.4 million in 2008. Our net loss per
share was $0.15 per diluted share in 2009 compared to a net income of $0.08 per
diluted share in 2008.
Comparison
of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 to Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008
The
following table sets forth revenue, operating income, operating ratios and
revenue per truck per week and the dollar and percentage changes of
each:
Revenue
from (a)
|
2009
|
2008
|
Dollar
Change
2009
vs. 2008
|
Percentage
Change
2009
vs. 2008
|
|||||||||||
Temperature-controlled
fleet
|
$
|
103,630
|
$
|
108,854
|
$
|
(5,224
|
)
|
(4.8
|
)
|
%
|
|||||
Dry-freight
fleet
|
40,805
|
53,107
|
(12,302
|
)
|
(23.2
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
truckload linehaul services
|
144,435
|
161,961
|
(17,526
|
)
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|||||||||
Dedicated
fleets
|
14,970
|
18,528
|
(3,558
|
)
|
(19.2
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
truckload
|
159,405
|
180,489
|
(21,084
|
)
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|||||||||
Less-than-truckload
linehaul services
|
81,105
|
92,947
|
(11,842
|
)
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|||||||||
Fuel
surcharges
|
32,065
|
90,124
|
(58,059
|
)
|
(64.4
|
)
|
|||||||||
Brokerage
|
5,415
|
10,629
|
(5,214
|
)
|
(49.1
|
)
|
|||||||||
Equipment
rental
|
3,612
|
4,017
|
(405
|
)
|
(10.1
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
revenue
|
281,602
|
378,206
|
(96,604
|
)
|
(25.5
|
)
|
|||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
301,454
|
376,346
|
(74,892
|
)
|
(19.9
|
)
|
|||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
$
|
(19,852
|
)
|
$
|
1,860
|
$
|
(21,712
|
)
|
(1,167.3
|
)
|
%
|
||||
Operating
ratio (b)
|
107.0
|
%
|
99.5
|
%
|
|||||||||||
Total
truckload revenue
|
$
|
159,405
|
$
|
180,489
|
$
|
(21,084
|
)
|
(11.7
|
)
|
%
|
|||||
Less-than-truckload
revenue
|
81,105
|
92,947
|
(11,842
|
)
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
linehaul and dedicated fleet revenue
|
$
|
240,510
|
$
|
273,436
|
$
|
(32,926
|
)
|
(12.0
|
)
|
%
|
|||||
Weekly
average trucks
|
2,024
|
2,029
|
(5
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
%
|
||||||||
Revenue
per truck per week (c)
|
$
|
3,047
|
$
|
3,443
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
(11.5
|
)
|
%
|
Computational
notes:
|
|
(a)
|
Revenue
and expense amounts are stated in thousands of dollars.
|
(b)
|
Operating
expenses divided by total revenue.
|
(c)
|
Average
daily revenue, times seven, divided by weekly average
trucks.
|
Total
revenue decreased $96.6 million, or 25.5%, to $281.6 million in 2009 from $378.2
million in 2008. Excluding fuel surcharges, our revenue decreased
$38.5 million, or 13.4%, to $249.5 million from $288.1 million in
2008.
16
Truckload revenue, excluding fuel surcharges, decreased $21.1 million, or 11.7%,
to $159.4 million from $180.5 million in 2008. Truckload revenues
declined primarily due to continued pricing pressures and excess capacity in the
industry driving down loaded miles 7.1% to 104.0 million from 112.0 million
in 2008. As a result, our empty mile ratio increased from 9.0% in
2008 to 10.0% in 2009. During 2008, the Company continued to focus on
providing services within our preferred networks; however, intermodal loads
decreased to optimize utility with our existing fleet. Our weighted average
trucks utilized in our truckload services decreased from 1,683 to
1,566. Due to the challenging freight environment, our ability to
increase truckload rates was limited throughout 2008 and into
2009. Our revenue per loaded mile declined to $1.39 in 2009 from
$1.45 in 2008.
Our dry
fleet revenue declined 23.2% during 2009 primarily due to a decline in total
tonnage shipped. Excess capacity within the dry transportation
industry resulted in increased competition for less available freight, which put
downward pressure on pricing.
Less-than-truckload
revenue decreased $11.8 million, or 12.7%, to $81.1 million from $92.9
million. The decline in revenue was primarily driven by increased
competition in the LTL market resulting in a decrease in total weight shipped
from a decline in shipments and a decline in average weight per
shipment. Total weight shipped for 2009 declined 12.0% to 563.0
million pounds from 639.7 million pounds in 2008. Although the
Company implemented a general rate increase during mid-2008 and 2009, these
increases were largely offset by other pricing pressures within the industry,
resulting in a decrease in revenue per hundredweight to $14.41 versus $14.53 a
year ago.
Fuel
surcharges represent the cost of fuel that we are able to pass along to our
customers based upon changes in the Department of Energy’s weekly
indices. The cost of fuel has decreased from 2008, resulting in
decreased fuel surcharges of $58.1 million, or 64.4% for the nine months in
2009. The lower fuel surcharge is offset by decreased fuel costs to
the Company within fuel and purchased transportation
expenses.
The
following table sets forth for the periods indicated the dollar and percentage
increase or decrease of the items in our consolidated condensed statements of
operations, and those items as a percentage of revenue:
(in
thousands)
Dollar
Change
|
Percentage
Change
|
Percentage
of Revenue
|
||||||||
2009
vs. 2008
|
2009
vs. 2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
(96,604
|
)
|
(25.5
|
)%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
||||||||||
Salaries,
wages and related expenses
|
(2,409
|
)
|
(2.5
|
)
|
33.4
|
25.5
|
||||
Purchased
transportation
|
(31,389
|
)
|
(33.7
|
)
|
21.9
|
24.6
|
||||
Fuel
|
(42,443
|
)
|
(47.9
|
)
|
16.4
|
23.5
|
||||
Supplies
and maintenance
|
(3,990
|
)
|
(10.0
|
)
|
12.7
|
10.5
|
||||
Revenue
equipment rent
|
3,652
|
14.2
|
10.4
|
6.8
|
||||||
Depreciation
|
(887
|
)
|
(6.3
|
)
|
4.7
|
3.8
|
||||
Claims
and insurance
|
1,933
|
21.5
|
3.9
|
2.4
|
||||||
Communications
and utilities
|
262
|
7.2
|
1.4
|
1.0
|
||||||
Operating
taxes and licenses
|
225
|
6.6
|
1.3
|
0.9
|
||||||
Gain
on sale of property and equipment
|
1,021
|
(93.2
|
)
|
0.0
|
(0.3
|
)
|
||||
Miscellaneous
|
(867
|
)
|
(26.8
|
)
|
0.9
|
0.8
|
||||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
$
|
(74,892
|
)
|
(19.9
|
)%
|
107.0
|
%
|
99.5
|
%
|
Total
operating expenses for 2009 decreased $74.9 million, or 19.9%, to $301.5 million
from $376.3 million in 2008. As a result of the decline in revenue
and the decrease in operating expenses, the operating ratio increased to 107.0%
from 99.5% in 2008.
17
Salaries,
wages and related expenses consist of compensation for our employees, including
drivers and non-drivers. It also includes employee-related costs,
including the costs of payroll taxes, work-related injuries, group health
insurance, 401(k) plan contributions and other fringe benefits. The
most variable of these salary, wage and related expenses is driver pay, which is
affected by the mix of company drivers and owner-operators in our fleets as well
as our efficiencies in our over-the-road operations. Driver salaries
including per diem costs decreased $2.0 million, or 3.5%, from 2008 resulting
from fewer miles driven by our drivers. Non-driver salaries decreased
$3.4 million driven by a reduction in non-driver headcount from 855 positions at
December 31, 2008 to 668 positions at September 30, 2009, partially offset by
severance of $608,000 incurred for the nine months. Group health
insurance costs increased by $2.0 million due to an increase in both claim
frequency and average claims per visit. The claim frequency was up
13.7% for 2009 over 2008 policy year.
Purchased
transportation expense consists of payments to independent contractors for the
equipment and services they provide, payments to other motor carriers who handle
our brokerage services and to various railroads for intermodal
services. It also includes fuel surcharges paid to our independent
contractors for which we charge our customers. These expenses are
highly variable with revenue and/or the mix of company drivers versus
independent contractors. Purchased transportation expense decreased
$31.4 million, or 33.7%, in 2009 from 2008. Purchased transportation
expense related to our intermodal service decreased by $5.1 million including
fuel surcharges, or 32.6%, compared to 2008 as our intermodal movements
declined. The portion of our purchased transportation connected with
our truckload and LTL services decreased $7.3 million, including fuel
surcharges, primarily reflecting a decrease in the number of independent
contractors utilized during 2009 versus last year. Purchased
transportation associated with our brokerage services decreased $4.5 million, or
50.0%, compared to 2008, as the result of a similar decrease in brokerage
revenue. Fuel payments to our independent contractors decreased from
$21.7 million in 2008 to $7.2 million in 2009 due to a decline in fuel
surcharges and a decrease in our utilization of independent
contractors.
Fuel
expense and fuel taxes decreased by $42.4 million, or 47.9%, to $46.3 million
from $88.7 million in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to a
41.9% decline in the Department of Energy’s Fuel Index and an increase in
our miles per gallon. We have fuel surcharge provisions in substantially
all of our transportation contracts and attempt to recover a portion of fuel
prices through fuel surcharges and rates to our
customers.
Supplies
and maintenance expenses primarily consist of repairs, maintenance and tires
along with load specific expenses including loading/unloading, tolls, pallets,
pickup and delivery and recruiting. Supplies and maintenance costs
decreased $4.0 million, or 10.0%, from 2008. The expense decrease was
primarily driven by lower recruiting costs of approximately $1.3 million as
fewer drivers were recruited, lower freight handling expenses of approximately
$825,000 due to a decline in revenues and lower fleet repairs and maintenance
costs of $1.6 million. Significant repairs to our equipment are
generally covered by manufacturers’ warranties.
Total
revenue equipment rent increased $3.7 million, or 14.2%, to $29.4 million from
$25.7 million in 2008. The increase is primarily due to an increase
in the average number of tractors under lease at the end of September 2009 of
1,272 compared to 1,152 at the end of September 2008 and the increase in the
average cost of equipment as we replace older equipment with new equipment and
as our leased versus owned ratio increases. We expect equipment rent
expense to increase in future periods as a result of higher prices of new
equipment.
Depreciation
relates to owned tractors, trailers, communications units, service centers and
other assets. Gains or losses on dispositions of revenue equipment are set forth
in a separate line item within our statements of
operations. Depreciation expense decreased $887,000, or 6.3%, as
older equipment was disposed and replaced with newer leased
equipment. Depreciation expense is also dependent upon the mix of
company-owned equipment versus independent contractors. We expect our
annual cost of tractor and trailer ownership will increase in future periods as
a result of higher prices of new equipment, which is expected to result in
greater depreciation. Future depreciation expense will be impacted by
our leasing decisions.
18
Claims
and insurance expenses consist of the costs of premiums for insurance
accruals we make within our self-insured retention amounts, primarily for
personal injury, property damage, physical damage and cargo
claims. These expenses will vary and are dependent on the frequency
and severity of accidents, our self-insured retention amounts and the insurance
market. Claims and insurance costs increased by $1.9 million, or 21.5%, to $10.9
million from $9.0 million in 2008. The increase was primarily due to
an increase in the severity of claims incurred. The Company is
responsible for the first $4.0 million on personal injury and property damage
liability claims and 25% of the claim amount between $4.0 million and $10.0
million. The Company has excess coverage from $10.0 million to $50.0
million. Our significant self-insured retention exposes us to the
possibility of significant fluctuations in claims expense between periods
depending on the frequency, severity and timing of claims and to adverse
financial results if we incur large or numerous losses. In the event
of an uninsured claim above our insurance coverage, a claim that approaches the
maximum self-insured retention level, or an increase in the frequency or
severity of claims within our self-insured retention, our financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
The
Company’s effective tax benefit rate was 30.7% in 2009 compared to an effective
tax rate of 66.9% in 2008. We pay our drivers a per-diem allowance
for travel related expenses for which we are only able to deduct 80% for tax
purposes. This, along with other non-deductible items for tax,
decreased our effective tax rate as we incurred a pre-tax loss in 2009 versus
income in 2008.
As a
result of factors described above, our net loss was $13.8 million in 2009
compared to net income of $806,000 in 2008. Our net loss per share
was $0.81 per diluted share in 2009 compared to net income of $0.05 per diluted
share in 2008.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES
Our
business requires substantial, ongoing capital investments, particularly for new
tractors and trailers. Our primary sources of liquidity are funds provided by
operations, our secured revolving credit facility and our ability to enter into
equipment leases with various financing institutions. A portion of
our tractor fleet is provided by independent contractors who own and operate
their own equipment. We have no capital expenditure requirements relating to
those drivers who own their tractors or obtain financing through third parties.
However, to the extent we purchase tractors and extend financing to the
independent contractors through our tractor purchase program, we have an
associated capital expenditure requirement.
In November 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program to
repurchase an additional 1 million shares of our common stock resulting in
approximately 1.4 million shares being authorized for purchase. This
program is intended to be implemented through purchases made in either the open
market or through private transactions. The timing and extent to which we
will repurchase shares depends on market conditions and other corporate
considerations. We made no purchases in 2008 or 2009 and have available
approximately 937,100 shares that can be repurchased from that and previous
authorizations. The repurchase program does not have an expiration
date.
The table
below reflects our net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities,
investing activities and financing activities and outstanding debt, including
current maturities, for the periods indicated.
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
cash flows provided by operating activities
|
$
|
6,516
|
$
|
3,017
|
||||
Net
cash flows (used in) investing activities
|
(4,537
|
)
|
(7,799
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(617
|
)
|
4,552
|
|||||
Debt
at September 30
|
-
|
5,800
|
19
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, we purchased $12.4 million of new property
and equipment, and recognized a gain of $75,000 on the disposition of used
equipment. We generated $6.5 million of cash flows from operating
activities primarily driven by depreciation and amortization and a decrease in
our accounts receivable balances partially offset by a decline in our net
deferred tax liabilities. Our net capital expenditures were primarily
funded with cash flows from operations. Based upon anticipated cash flows,
current borrowing availability and sources of financing we expect to be
available to us, we do not anticipate any significant liquidity constraints in
the foreseeable future. We estimate that capital expenditures will range
from $17-$20 million in 2009, which will be higher than our historical levels
due to our tractor replacement schedule and the consolidation of two facilities
into one service center in New Jersey.
We
establish credit terms with our customers based upon their financial strength
and their historical payment pattern. Many of our largest
customers under contract are Fortune 500 companies. Given the current
economic conditions, we have placed additional emphasis on our review of
significant outstanding receivable balances. Accounts receivable are
recorded at the invoiced amounts, net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the
realization of these receivables including the current creditworthiness of each
customer and related aging of the past-due balances, including any billing
disputes. In order to assess the collectability of these receivables, we
perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition.
Through these evaluations, we may become aware of a situation in which a
customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration
of its financial viability, credit ratings or bankruptcy. Our allowance
for doubtful accounts is based on the best information available to us and is
reevaluated and adjusted as additional information is received. We
evaluate the allowance based on historical write-off experience, the size of the
individual customer balances, past-due amounts and the overall national
economy. Invoice balances after the due date are considered past due per
our policy and are reviewed individually for collectability. During 2009,
we decreased our reserve for doubtful accounts by $507,000 from December 31,
2008 as our past due receivables declined as a percentage of outstanding
balances and the risk of bad debts was reduced as the aging
improved. Initial payments by new customers are monitored for
compliance with contractual terms. Account balances are charged off
against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the
potential recovery is considered remote.
On September 2, 2009, the Company entered into the Second Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement (the "Credit Facility") that provides for a two-year secured
committed credit facility maturing in September 2011 with an aggregate
availability of $35.0 million. We may borrow an amount not to exceed
the lesser of $35.0 million, adjusted for letters of credit and other debt (as
defined in the agreement), a borrowing base or a multiple of a measurement of
cash flow. At September 30, 2009, there were no amounts
borrowed under the Credit Facility; however, we had $5.4 million of standby
letters of credit primarily for our self-insurance programs, which reduced the
availability to $29.6 million. The Credit Facility is further limited
to the borrowing base, which is defined as 85% of the eligible accounts
receivable balance, which primarily excludes amounts past due over 90 days,
in-transit shipments and the current portion of freight claims. The
borrowing base as of September 30, 2009 was $26.2 million, which is net of
standby letters of credit. The Credit Facility bears interest at a
spread over the London Interbank Offered
Rate.
20
The
Credit Facility contains several covenants, which include the
following:
·
|
The
ratio of our annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
amortization, rental and any non-cash expenses from stock option activity
(as defined in the Credit Facility, “EBITDAR”) to the amount of our annual
fixed charges may not be less than 1.25:1.0. Fixed charges generally
include interest payments, rental expense, taxes paid, dividends paid and
payments due on outstanding debt.
|
·
|
The
ratio of our funded debt to EBITDAR may not exceed 2.5:1.0. Funded debt
generally includes the amount borrowed under the credit facility or
similar arrangements, letters of credit and the aggregate minimum amount
of operating lease payments we are obligated to pay in the
future.
|
·
|
Our
tangible net worth must remain an amount greater than $85.0 million.
Tangible net worth is generally defined as our net shareholders' equity
minus intangible and certain other assets plus 100% of any cash we receive
from the issuance of equity
securities.
|
·
|
The
annual amount of our net expenditures for property and equipment may not
be more than $25.0 million after taking into account the amounts we
receive from the sale of such
assets.
|
·
|
Payments
of dividends are generally limited by the ratio of our EBITDAR to fixed
charges and if the previous quarter is not
profitable.
|
On
November 4, 2009 the Company entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility to
reduce the amount of available credit from $35.0 million to $25.0 million to
better align the size of the facility to the underlying borrowing base, increase
the allowable funded debt to EBITDAR, decrease the required EBITDAR to fixed
charges and to decrease the minimum tangible net worth based upon the following
periods:
Periods
Ending
|
EBITDAR
to Fixed Charges
|
Funded
Debt to EBITDAR
|
(in
thousands)
Minimum
Tangible Net Worth
|
|||||
October 2009 – November 2009 | 1.05:1.0 | 2.75:1.0 | $ | 85,000 | ||||
December
2009 – February 2010
|
1.05:1.0
|
2.75:1.0
|
|
80,000
|
||||
March
2010 – May 2010
|
1.10:1.0
|
2.75:1.0
|
80,000
|
|||||
June
2010 – August 2010
|
1.20:1.0
|
2.75:1.0
|
75,000
|
|||||
Subsequent
to August 2010
|
1.25:1.0
|
2.50:1.0
|
75,000
|
The
amendment also reduces the allowable net expenditures for property and equipment
during any twelve month period from $25.0 million to $12.5 million, reduces the
available expenditures for acquisitions from $10.0 million to $3.5 million in
any fiscal year and changes the interest rate spread over the London Interbank
Offered Rate based upon achieving various EBITDAR to fixed charges
ratios.
At
September 30, 2009, our EBITDAR was $42.1 million. Our fixed charges
were $33.4 million, resulting in a fixed charge coverage ratio of
1.26. Our funded debt as defined in the agreement was $95.1 million
resulting in funded debt to EBITDAR ratio of 2.26. Maintaining a
credit facility is imperative for us to continue our operations by allowing us
to manage our working capital and acquire revenue equipment that is essential to
our operations. Should we not be able to meet these
covenants, amounts outstanding may become payable immediately and our
ability to make future draws on the Credit Facility or enter into financial
arrangements on our equipment may be limited. We are in compliance
with all of the covenants under the Credit Facility as of September 30,
2009.
21
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
2009
|
2010-2011
|
2012-2013
|
After
2013
|
||||||||||||||||
Letters
of credit
|
$
|
5,422
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
5,422
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||
Purchase
obligations
|
19,933
|
19,933
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
leases obligations
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Rentals
|
89,680
|
8,970
|
50,630
|
19,174
|
10,906
|
|||||||||||||||
Residual
guarantees
|
8,642
|
-
|
3,578
|
5,064
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||
$
|
123,677
|
$
|
28,903
|
$
|
59,630
|
$
|
24,238
|
$
|
10,906
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of
September 30, 2009, we leased 1,207 tractors and 2,127 trailers under operating
leases with varying termination dates ranging from October 2009 through October
2015 with total obligations of $89.7 million. Rent expense related to
operating leases involving vehicles during the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008 was $29.4 million and $25.7 million, respectively. We
maintain standby letters of credit related to self-insured programs in the
amount of $5.4 million. These standby letters of credit allow the
Company to self-insure a portion of its insurance exposure.
Inflation
and Fuel Costs
Most of our operating expenses are inflation-sensitive, with inflation generally
producing increased costs of operations. During the past three years, the most
significant effects of inflation have been on revenue equipment prices, accident
claims, health insurance, employee compensation and fuel. We attempt
to limit the effects of inflation through increases in freight rates and cost
control efforts.
In addition to inflation, fluctuations in fuel prices can affect our
profitability. We require substantial amounts of fuel to operate our tractors
and power the temperature-control units on our trailers. Substantially all of
our contracts with customers contain fuel surcharge provisions. Although we
historically have been able to pass through most long-term increases in fuel
prices and related taxes to our customers in the form of surcharges and higher
rates, such increases usually are not fully recovered. We do not
hedge our exposure to fuel prices through financial derivatives.
Seasonality
Our
temperature-controlled truckload operations are affected by seasonal changes.
The growing seasons for fruits and vegetables in Florida, California and Texas
typically create increased demand for trailers equipped to transport cargo
requiring refrigeration. Our LTL operations are also impacted by the seasonality
of certain commodities. LTL shipment volume during the winter months is normally
lower than other months. Shipping volumes of LTL freight are usually highest
from July through October. LTL volumes also tend to increase in the
weeks before holidays such as Easter, Halloween, Thanksgiving and Christmas when
significant volumes of food and candy are transported.
Our
tractor productivity generally decreases during the winter season as inclement
weather impedes operations and some shippers typically reduce their shipments as
there is less need for temperature control during colder months than warmer
months. At the same time, operating expenses generally increase, with harsh
weather creating higher accident frequency, increased claims and more equipment
repairs.
22
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions about future events, and apply judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses in our
consolidated financial statements and related notes. We base our
estimates, assumptions and judgments on historical experience, current trends
and other factors believed to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial
statements are prepared. However, because future events and their effects
cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our
estimates and assumptions, and such differences could be material. We
believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant
estimates, assumptions and judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue and the related
direct costs on the date the freight is picked up from the
shipper. One of the preferable methods under US GAAP provides for the
recognition of revenue and direct costs when the shipment is
completed. Changing to this method would not have a material impact
on the quarterly financial results or operations of the Company.
Property and
Equipment. The transportation industry is capital intensive.
Our net property and equipment was $75.6 million as of September 30, 2009 and
$83.4 million as of December 31, 2008. Our depreciation expense was $13.3
million for 2009 and $14.2 million for 2008. Depreciation is computed based on
the cost of the asset, reduced by its estimated residual value, using the
straight-line method for financial reporting purposes. Accelerated methods
are used for income tax reporting purposes. Additions and improvements to
property and equipment are capitalized at cost. Maintenance and repair
expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. Gains and losses on
disposals of revenue equipment are included in operations as they are a normal,
recurring component of our operations. We have minimal risk to the
used equipment market as the majority of our tractors have a pre-arranged
trade-in value at the end of 42 months, which is utilized as the residual value
in computing depreciation expense.
Impairment of
Assets. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by
a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the
carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be
disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less
the costs to sell.
23
Insurance and
claims. We are self-insured for a portion of losses relating
to workers’ compensation, auto liability, general liability, cargo and property
damage claims, along with employees’ health insurance with varying risk
retention levels. We maintain insurance coverage for per-incident
occurrences and in excess of these risk retention levels in amounts we consider
adequate based upon historical experience and our ongoing review. We
reserve currently for the estimated cost of the uninsured portion of pending
claims. These reserves are periodically evaluated and adjusted based on our
evaluation of the nature and severity of outstanding individual claims and an
estimate of future claims development based on historical claims development
factors. The Company accrues for the anticipated legal and other
costs to settle the claims currently. The Company is responsible for the
first $4.0 million on each personal injury and property damage claim and 25% of
the claim amount between $4.0 million and $10.0 million. The Company
has excess coverage from $10.0 million to $50.0 million. The Company
utilizes an independent actuary to assist in establishing its
accruals. Our significant self-insured retention exposes us to the
possibility of significant fluctuations in claims expense between periods
depending on the frequency, severity and timing of claims and to adverse
financial results if we incur large or numerous losses. In the event
of an uninsured claim above our insurance coverage, a claim that approaches the
maximum self-insured retention level, or an increase in the frequency or
severity of claims within our self-insured retention, our financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
RECENT ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Effective July 1,
2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (ASC 105), (formerly SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles). This standard
establishes only two levels of US GAAP, authoritative and nonauthoritative. The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) became the source of
authoritative, nongovernmental US GAAP, except for rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative US GAAP for SEC
registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not
included in the Codification became nonauthoritative. The Company began using
the new guidelines and numbering system prescribed by the Codification when
referring to US GAAP in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. As the Codification
was not intended to change or alter existing US GAAP, it did not have any impact
on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
24
We are
exposed to a variety of market risks, primarily from fuel prices and interest
rates. These risks have not materially changed between December 31, 2008 and
September 30, 2009.
Commodity
Price Risk
Our
operations are heavily dependent upon fuel prices. The price and
availability can vary and are subject to political, economic and market factors
that are beyond our control. Significant increases in diesel fuel
costs could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and
financial condition; however, historically we’ve been able to recover the
majority of diesel fuel price increases from customers in the form of fuel
surcharges. Fuel prices have fluctuated greatly in recent years. In
some periods, our operating performance was adversely affected because we were
not able to fully offset the impact of higher diesel fuel prices through
increased freight rates and fuel surcharges. We cannot predict the extent to
which high fuel price levels will continue in the future or the extent to which
fuel surcharges could be collected to offset such increases. We do not enter
into derivative hedging arrangements that protect us against fuel price
increases. A 5% increase in the average fuel cost per gallon would
result in annual increased fuel costs of approximately $4.0 million that we
anticipate would be substantially offset by fuel surcharges.
Interest
Rate Risk
Our
market risk is also affected by changes in interest rates. We have
historically maintained a combination of fixed rate and variable rate
obligations to manage our interest rate exposure. Fixed rates are
generally maintained within our lease obligations while variable rates are
contained within our amended and restated credit agreement.
We are
exposed to interest rate risk primarily from our amended and restated credit
agreement. Our credit agreement, as amended, provides for borrowings
that bear interest based on a spread over the London Interbank Offered Rate
(commonly referred to as “LIBOR”). At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
there were no borrowings outstanding under our credit facility.
As of
September 30, 2009, we held no market-risk-sensitive instruments for trading
purposes. For purposes other than trading, we held approximately 76,920
shares of our common stock at a value of $225,000 in a Rabbi Trust investment.
Our consolidated financial statements include the assets and liabilities of the
Rabbi Trust established to hold the investments of participants in our 401(k)
Wrap Plan and for deferred compensation liabilities under our Executive Bonus
and Phantom Stock Plan. Such liabilities are adjusted from time to
time to reflect changes in the market price of our common stock. To
the extent the trust assets are invested in our stock, our future compensation
expense and income will be impacted by fluctuations in the market price of our
stock.
Item
4. Controls and
Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we have carried out an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of
the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was carried
out under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer.
Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as
of September 30, 2009. There were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that
have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting. We intend to periodically
evaluate our disclosure controls and procedures as required by the Exchange Act
Rules.
25
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
We are
involved in litigation incidental to our operations, primarily involving claims
for personal injury, property damage, work-related injuries and cargo losses
incurred in the ordinary and routine transportation of freight.
On
January 8, 2008, a shareholders’ derivative action was filed in the District
Court of Dallas County, 192nd District, entitled James L. and Eleanor A. Gayner,
Individually and as Trustees of The James L. & Eleanor 81 UAD 02/04/1981
Trust, Derivatively On Behalf of Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. v. Stoney
M. Stubbs, Jr., et al. This action alleged that certain of our
current and former officers and directors breached their respective fiduciary
duties in connection with our equipment lease arrangements with certain
related-parties, which were terminated in September 2006. The
shareholders sought, on our behalf, an order that the lease arrangements were
null and void from their origination, an unspecified amount of damages, the
imposition of a constructive trust on any benefits received by the defendants as
a result of their alleged wrongful conduct, and recovery of attorneys’ fees and
costs. A special litigation committee (“SLC”) consisting solely of
independent directors was created to investigate the claims in the
derivative action. The
derivative action was stayed while the SLC conducted an
investigation. The parties reached a tentative settlement of the
disputed claims upon the conclusion of the SLC's investigation.
During 2008, the Company settled this lawsuit and derivative action without
significant financial consideration, which was approved by the Court in April
2009. Under the settlement, the Company agreed to make certain
corporate governance changes beginning in early March 2009. The
Company has made the majority of these changes and anticipates completion by
December 31, 2009.
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
Certain risks
associated with our operations are discussed in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, under the heading
“Risk Factors” in Item 1A of that report. We do not believe there have
been any material changes in these risks during the nine months ended September
30, 2009.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds
On
November 9, 2007, our Board of Directors renewed our authorization to purchase
approximately 1.4 million shares of our common stock. At September 30,
2009, there were a total of 937,100 remaining authorized shares that could be
repurchased. No shares were repurchased during the third quarter of
2009. The authorization did not specify an expiration date. Shares
may be purchased from time to time on the open market or through private
transactions at such times as management deems appropriate. Purchases may
be discontinued by our Board of Directors at any time.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
None.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a
Vote of Security Holders
Item
5. Other
Information
On
November 4, 2009, we entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility which
reduced the amount of available credit under the facility and modified certain
financial covenants. For additional information, see "Part I. Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources."
26
Item
6. Exhibits
3.1
|
Restated
Articles of Incorporation of Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. (filed
as Exhibit 3(i) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on May 29,
2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on March 3, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.1
|
Second
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2009,
among FFE Transportation Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Frozen
Food Express Industries, Inc., a Texas corporation, Conwell Corporation, a
Delaware corporation, FX Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Lisa
Motor Lines, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Compressors Plus, Inc., a Texas
corporation, FFE Logistics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Conwell LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, Comerica Bank, a Texas banking
association, each other entity which may from time to time become party
hereto as a lender hereunder or any successor or assignee thereof, and
Comerica as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Issuing Bank (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on September
8, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.2
|
First
Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among
Comerica Bank as administrative agent, collateral agent, issuing bank and
bank and FFE Transportation Services, Inc. as borrower and certain of its
affiliates as of September 2, 2009 (filed herewith).
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith).
|
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of l934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
FROZEN
FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Dated:
November 6, 2009
|
By
|
/s/
Stoney M. Stubbs, Jr.
|
Stoney
M. Stubbs, Jr.
Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
Dated:
November 6, 2009
|
By
|
/s/
Ronald J. Knutson
|
Ronald
J. Knutson
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
28
EXHIBIT
INDEX
3.1
|
Restated
Articles of Incorporation of Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. (filed
as Exhibit 3(i) to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on May 29,
2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Frozen Food Express Industries, Inc. (filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Commission on March 3, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.1
|
Second
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2009,
among FFE Transportation Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Frozen
Food Express Industries, Inc., a Texas corporation, Conwell Corporation, a
Delaware corporation, FX Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Lisa
Motor Lines, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Compressors Plus, Inc., a Texas
corporation, FFE Logistics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Conwell LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, Comerica Bank, a Texas banking
association, each other entity which may from time to time become party
hereto as a lender hereunder or any successor or assignee thereof, and
Comerica as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Issuing Bank (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K on September
8, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
10.2
|
First
Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among
Comerica Bank as administrative agent for collateral agent, issuing bank
and bank and FFE Transportation Services, Inc. as borrower and certain of
its affiliates as of September 2, 2009 (filed
herewith).
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith).
|
29