Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - LADISH CO INC | c91797exv31w2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - LADISH CO INC | c91797exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - LADISH CO INC | c91797exv32w1.htm |
Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2009
Commission File Number 001-34495
Ladish Co., Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin | 31-1145953 | |
(State or other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
5481 South Packard Avenue, Cudahy, Wisconsin | 53110 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(414) 747-2611
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate
Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at September 30, 2009 | |
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value | 15,903,004 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page 2 of 15
Table of Contents
Ladish Co., Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 76,191 | $ | 120,761 | $ | 266,616 | $ | 356,917 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
71,469 | 102,568 | 248,233 | 308,396 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
4,722 | 18,193 | 18,383 | 48,521 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
5,692 | 6,077 | 14,007 | 15,321 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(970 | ) | 12,116 | 4,376 | 33,200 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,428 | ) | (338 | ) | (3,594 | ) | (1,018 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net |
(632 | ) | 56 | (965 | ) | (828 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit) |
(3,030 | ) | 11,834 | (183 | ) | 31,354 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
(780 | ) | 1,373 | 228 | 8,654 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(2,250 | ) | 10,461 | (411 | ) | 22,700 | ||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest in net earnings (loss) of subsidiary |
(41 | ) | 26 | (52 | ) | 63 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to the controlling interest |
$ | (2,209 | ) | $ | 10,435 | $ | (359 | ) | $ | 22,637 | ||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.70 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 1.54 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.70 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 1.54 | ||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
15,901,877 | 14,979,002 | 15,901,439 | 14,695,315 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
15,901,877 | 14,981,118 | 15,901,439 | 14,698,048 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Page 3 of 15
Table of Contents
Ladish Co., Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 12,716 | $ | 4,903 | ||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $75 and $84, respectively |
54,502 | 78,673 | ||||||
Inventories |
102,602 | 129,307 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
6,804 | 6,780 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
7,108 | 10,469 | ||||||
Total current assets |
183,732 | 230,132 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment: |
||||||||
Land and improvements |
6,888 | 6,414 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements |
55,606 | 54,652 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
237,562 | 229,310 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
63,673 | 62,244 | ||||||
363,729 | 352,620 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(164,392 | ) | (153,351 | ) | ||||
Net property, plant and equipment |
199,337 | 199,269 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
19,426 | 19,880 | ||||||
Goodwill |
37,571 | 37,113 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
19,602 | 20,011 | ||||||
Other assets |
4,109 | 3,061 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 463,777 | $ | 509,466 | ||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 27,456 | $ | 39,020 | ||||
Senior bank debt |
| 28,900 | ||||||
Senior notes |
5,714 | | ||||||
Accrued liabilities: |
||||||||
Pensions |
368 | 341 | ||||||
Postretirement benefits |
3,540 | 3,540 | ||||||
Officers deferred compensation |
31 | 31 | ||||||
Wages and salaries |
4,373 | 4,911 | ||||||
Taxes, other than income taxes |
258 | 304 | ||||||
Interest |
1,155 | 1,425 | ||||||
Profit sharing |
164 | 1,898 | ||||||
Paid progress billings |
3,416 | 4,683 | ||||||
Other |
3,599 | 6,169 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
50,074 | 91,222 | ||||||
Noncurrent liabilities: |
||||||||
Senior notes |
84,286 | 90,000 | ||||||
Pensions |
64,902 | 63,661 | ||||||
Postretirement benefits |
28,246 | 29,716 | ||||||
Officers deferred compensation |
7,114 | 6,792 | ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
4,216 | 3,998 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
238,838 | 285,389 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Common stock
authorized 100,000,000, issued 15,907,552
shares at each date of $.01 par value |
159 | 159 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
153,292 | 153,285 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
138,925 | 139,284 | ||||||
Treasury stock, 4,548 and 6,336 shares of common stock,
respectively, at cost |
(33 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(67,964 | ) | (69,271 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
224,379 | 223,411 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest in equity of subsidiary |
560 | 666 | ||||||
Total equity |
224,939 | 224,077 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 463,777 | $ | 509,466 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Page 4 of 15
Table of Contents
Ladish Co., Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Dollars in Thousands)
For the Nine Months | ||||||||
Ended September 30, | ||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (359 | ) | $ | 22,637 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
11,466 | 9,696 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
409 | | ||||||
Non-cash compensation related to deferred compensation plans |
418 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
349 | 3,000 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest in net (loss) earnings of subsidiary |
(52 | ) | 63 | |||||
Gain on
purchase of stock noncontrolling interest |
(15 | ) | | |||||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
284 | 154 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
24,095 | (2,083 | ) | |||||
Inventories |
26,817 | (4,940 | ) | |||||
Other assets |
1,945 | (6,432 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(18,558 | ) | 6,735 | |||||
Other liabilities |
1,455 | (6,797 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
48,254 | 22,033 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
(10,946 | ) | (40,193 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
62 | 210 | ||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash required |
| (40,271 | ) | |||||
Purchase of
subsidiary stock noncontrolling interest |
(33 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from working capital adjustment on Aerex acquisition |
1,200 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(9,717 | ) | (80,254 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from (repayment of) senior bank debt |
(28,900 | ) | 18,700 | |||||
Repayment of capital lease obligations |
(1,660 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from senior notes |
| 50,000 | ||||||
Repayment of senior notes |
| (6,000 | ) | |||||
Repayment of subsidiary debt |
| (4,610 | ) | |||||
Deferrred financing costs |
| (299 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
15 | 215 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(30,545 | ) | 58,006 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(179 | ) | 202 | |||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
7,813 | (13 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
4,903 | 5,952 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
$ | 12,716 | $ | 5,939 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Page 5 of 15
Table of Contents
Ladish Co., Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
(1) Basis of Presentation
In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly its financial position at
September 30, 2009 and its results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented.
All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with Article 10 of Regulation S-X and therefore do not include all disclosures required
for annual financial statements presented in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The Company has filed a report on Form 10-K which
contains audited consolidated financial statements that include all information and footnotes
necessary for a fair presentation of its financial position at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. The December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet and the
2008 condensed consolidated statements of operations as previously presented have been modified
pursuant to the issuance of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) ASC 810. On July 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 105-10, The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. This pronouncement establishes the FASB ASC as the source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied in preparation of
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States of America. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods. Actual results will likely differ from those estimates, but
management believes such differences will not be material.
The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to
be expected for a full year.
(2) Inventories
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Raw material and supplies |
$ | 24,335 | $ | 31,182 | ||||
Work-in-process and finished goods |
81,249 | 100,019 | ||||||
Less progress payments |
(2,982 | ) | (1,894 | ) | ||||
Total inventories |
$ | 102,602 | $ | 129,307 | ||||
Page 6 of 15
Table of Contents
(3) Interest and Income Tax Payments
For the Nine Months | ||||||||
Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 4,749 | $ | 2,301 | ||||
Income taxes (refunded) paid |
(2,650 | ) | 8,453 |
(4) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash in excess of daily requirements is invested in marketable securities consisting of commercial
paper and money market instruments which mature in three months or less. Such investments are
deemed to be cash equivalents due to the high liquidity and short term duration of such money
market accounts. Outstanding payroll and accounts payable checks related to certain bank accounts
are recorded as accounts payable on the balance sheets. These checks amounted to $179 and $4,933
as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
(5) Revenue Recognition
Sales revenue is recognized when the title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, there is
pervasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred or the services have been provided, the
sales price is determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. This generally occurs at the
time of shipment. Net sales include freight out as well as reductions for returns and allowances,
and sales discounts. Progress payments on contracts are generally recognized as reductions of the
related inventory costs. Progress payments in excess of inventory costs are reflected as a
liability.
(6) Income Taxes
The year-to-date tax provision for 2008 was based on an annualized combined federal, state and
foreign effective rate of 27.6%, which differed from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% due
primarily to state income taxes, offset by the impact of lower income tax rates in Poland and the
benefits of the Domestic Production Activities deduction and a $5,304 tax credit from research and
development expenses incurred by the Company in prior years. In 2009, the Company had income tax
expense of $228 despite a year-to-date loss of $(183). This was due to domestic income tax expense
of $623, or 27.8%, based on domestic income of $2,245, only being partially offset by a foreign tax
benefit of $(395), or (16.3)%, based on foreign losses of $(2,428). The 2009 domestic effective
tax rate is less than the statutory federal tax rate of 35% due primarily to tax benefits
recognized in 2009 from the Chen-Tech acquisition.
(7) Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The components of net periodic benefit costs recognized for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 are presented in the table below.
Other | ||||||||||||||||
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1,010 | $ | 668 | $ | 143 | $ | 116 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
8,891 | 8,998 | 1,426 | 1,536 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(9,949 | ) | (11,785 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
293 | 301 | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of the net loss |
3,955 | 2,723 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 4,200 | $ | 905 | $ | 1,584 | $ | 1,667 | ||||||||
Page 7 of 15
Table of Contents
The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008,
that it expected to contribute $8,309 to its pension plans in 2009. As of September 30,
2009, the Company has made $2,554 of cash contributions to the pension plans versus $7,643 during
the same period in 2008. The Company currently estimates its total contributions to its pension
plans in 2009 will be $3,428.
In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 was
enacted. The Company has concluded that certain benefits provided by its postretirement benefit
plan are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act and has filed a refund request
with the Claims Management Services, a division of the Health and Human Services Department. In
the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company received refunds of $159 and
$166.
(8) Debt
The Company sold $30,000 of Series A senior notes (the Series A Notes) in a private placement to
certain institutional investors on July 20, 2001. The Series A Notes were unsecured and bore
interest at a rate of 7.19% per annum with the interest being paid semiannually. The Series A
Notes had a seven-year duration with the principal amortizing equally over the duration after the
third year. Amortization payments of $6,000 annually were made on July 20, 2004 through 2008, at
which point the Series A Notes were retired.
On May 16, 2006, the Company sold $40,000 of Series B senior notes (the Series B Notes) in a
private placement to certain institutional investors. The Series B Notes are unsecured and bear
interest at a rate of 6.14% per annum with interest being paid semiannually. The Series B Notes
have a ten-year duration with the principal amortizing equally over the duration after the fourth
year.
On September 2, 2008, the Company sold $50,000 of Series C senior notes (the Series C Notes) in a
private placement to certain institutional investors. The Series C Notes are unsecured and bear
interest at a rate of 6.41% per annum with interest being paid semiannually. The Series C Notes
have a seven-year duration with the principal amortizing equally over the duration after the third
year.
The Companys Series B and Series C Notes contain financial covenants which (a) limit the
incurrence of certain additional debt; (b) require a certain level of consolidated adjusted net
worth; (c) require a minimum fixed charges coverage ratio; and (d) require a limited amount of
funded debt to consolidated cash flow. The covenant on incurrence of additional debt limits funded
debt to 60% of total capitalization. At September 30, 2009, funded debt at Ladish was at 26% of
total capitalization. This covenant also limits priority debt to 20% of adjusted net worth.
Ladish had no priority debt at September 30, 2009. The covenant on adjusted net worth requires a
minimum of $111,306. At September 30, 2009, Ladish had $256,725 of adjusted net worth. The
covenant on fixed charges coverage ratio requires that consolidated cash flow to fixed charges be a
minimum of 2.00. The Companys fixed charges coverage ratio at September 30, 2009 was 5.88. The
final covenant on funded debt to consolidated cash flow allows for a maximum level of 4.00. At
September 30, 2009, the Companys actual level was 3.36. The Note Agreement for the Series B and
Series C Notes also contains customary representations and warranties and events of default.
At September 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants in the Series B and Series
C Notes and the Facility.
The Company and a syndicate of lenders have entered into a revolving credit facility (the
Facility) which was most recently renewed on April 10, 2009. The Facility consists of a $35,000
unsecured revolving line of credit which bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.00% or at a base
rate. At
September 30, 2009, there were no borrowings under the Facility and $35,000 was available pursuant
to the terms of the Facility. The Facility has a maturity date of April 9, 2010.
Page 8 of 15
Table of Contents
On July 31, 2009, the Company and the syndicate of lenders participating in the Facility entered
into Amendment No. 1 to the Facility. This Amendment, effective as of the date of execution,
modified the covenant on maximum indebtedness to EBITDA by deleting that covenant and substituting
in its place a covenant on minimum EBITDA. In addition, the lenders and the Company agreed to
modify the definition of EBITDA for this covenant by now allowing the Company to add back non-cash
charges to EBITDA.
The Facility also contains certain financial covenants which (a) require a minimum amount of
modified EBITDA and (b) require a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.7x. At September 30,
2009, the Company was in compliance with the minimum modified EBITDA and had a fixed charge
coverage ratio of 7.19x. The Facility also contains customary representations and warranties and
events of default.
(9) Earnings Per Share
The incremental difference between basic weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted
average shares outstanding is due to the dilutive impact of outstanding options.
(10) Stockholders Equity
The Company has a Stock Option Plan (the Plan) that covers certain employees. Under the Plan,
incentive stock options for up to 983,333 shares may be granted to employees of the Company, of
which 943,833 options have been granted. These options expire ten years from the grant date.
Options granted vest over two years. There were no options granted and 1,788 options were
exercised in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, 4,548 options
granted under the Plan remain outstanding and exercisable.
(11) Legal Proceedings
From time to time the Company is involved in legal proceedings relating to claims arising out of
its operations in the normal course of business. Although the Company believes that there are no
material legal proceedings pending or threatened against the Company or any of its properties, the
Company has been named as a defendant in a number of asbestos cases. As of the date of this
filing, the Company has twelve individual claims pending in Mississippi, two individual claims
pending in Illinois and one individual claim pending in Wisconsin. The Company has never
manufactured or processed asbestos. The Companys only exposure to asbestos involves products the
Company purchased from third parties. Given that the consortium of insurers are handling the
defense of the Company, combined with the lack of actual exposure or prior negative judgments, the
Company has not made any provision in its financial statements for the asbestos litigation.
The Company is also participating in an investigation initiated by U.S. Customs & Border Protection
(Customs) into duty drawback claims filed on behalf of the Company by its former export agent.
The Company is cooperating with Customs in this investigation and has voluntarily suspended its
duty drawback claims. Based upon its internal investigation, the Company believes any errors or
omissions with respect to its filings were solely attributable to its former export agent. The
Company intends to continue to cooperate with Customs in resolving this matter.
Page 9 of 15
Table of Contents
(12) New Accounting Pronouncements
Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles Overall. ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB ASC as the source of authoritative
accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied in the preparation of financial
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Company
has updated GAAP referencing for this report. The FASB Codification had no impact on financial
reporting of the Company.
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance for accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests
in financial statements, which is included in ASC 810-10, Consolidation Overall. The objective
of ASC 810-10 is to improve the financial information provided in consolidated financial
statements. ASC 810-10 changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented, establishes
a single method of accounting for changes in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do
not result in deconsolidation, requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated, and expands disclosures in the consolidated financial statements in
order to clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parents owners and the
interest of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. ASC 810-10 is effective for the Companys
2009 fiscal year. The Company adopted ASC 810-10 effective January 1, 2009. ASC 810-10 modified
the manner in which the Company reported on the noncontrolling interest in ZKM as the
noncontrolling interest has been classified as a component of equity.
On December 30, 2008, the FASB issued guidance related to employers disclosures regarding
postretirement benefit plan assets, which is included in ASC 715-20, Defined Benefit Plans. ASC
715-20 provides additional guidance on employers disclosures about plan assets of a defined
benefit pension or other postretirement plan. ASC 715-20 is effective for periods ending after
December 15, 2009. The disclosure requirements are annual and do not apply to interim financial
statements.
Effective June 30, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 855-10, Subsequent Events Overall. ASC
855-10 establishes standards for the accounting for and the disclosing of subsequent events. ASC
855-10 introduces new terminology, defines a date through which management must evaluate subsequent
events, and lists the circumstances under which an entity must recognize and disclose events or
transactions occurring after the balance sheet date.
The Company evaluated its September 30, 2009 financial statements for subsequent events through
November 2, 2009, the date the financial statements were available to be issued. The Company is
not aware of any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements.
(13) Subsequent Events
On October 9, 2009, the Company and American Stock Transfer and Trust Company, LLC entered into a
Rights Agreement (the Agreement) which grants certain rights to shareholders of record on October
20, 2009. The Company filed a Form 8-K on October 15, 2009 announcing this event and filed the
Agreement as an exhibit to the Form 8-K.
Page 10 of 15
Table of Contents
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CHANGES IN FINANCIAL POSITION
(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Third Quarter 2009 Compared to Third Quarter 2008
Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2009 were $76,191 compared to $120,761 for the
same period in 2008. The 36.9% decrease in net sales for the third quarter of 2009 versus 2008 was
due to the worldwide decline in all markets served by the Company. Gross profit for the third
quarter of 2009 was 6.2% of net sales in contrast to 15.1% of net sales in the third quarter of
2008. The reduction in gross profit in the third quarter of 2009 is primarily a result of the
decline in sales, which diminished the Companys opportunity for incremental earnings, combined
with additional pension expense, a reduction of by-product sales, higher depreciation and
employment reduction expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $5,692 and $6,077 and, as a percentage of net
sales, were 7.5% and 5.0% for the third quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The percentage
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was attributed to the 36.9% decrease in
net sales and an early retirement charge of $1,300 in the third quarter of 2009.
Interest expense for the third quarter of 2009 was $1,428 in contrast to $338 for the same period
in 2008. The higher interest expense in 2009 is due primarily to reduced capitalization of
interest expense on capital projects. During the third quarter of 2009, the Companys revolving
line of credit had an interest rate equal to the LIBOR rate plus 2.00% or at a base rate. Series B
and Series C senior notes bore interest at the rate of 6.14% and 6.41%, respectively. The Company
had no borrowings under the revolving line of credit facility and had $90,000 of senior notes
outstanding at the end of the third quarter of 2009.
Pretax loss for the third quarter of 2009 was $(3,030) in contrast to $11,834 in income for the
same period in 2008. The decline in pretax income was due to the loss of incremental sales, the
relative absence of by-product sales, and significantly higher expenses associated with pensions,
employment reductions, depreciation and interest.
The 2009 and 2008 third quarter income tax provisions are based on effective tax rates of (25.7)%
and 11.6%, respectively. The principal difference in 2008 from the statutory federal tax rate of
35% is due primarily to the Companys recognition of a $5,304 tax credit from research and
development expenses incurred by the Company in prior years. The 2009 effective tax benefit rate
is less than the statutory federal tax rate of 35% due to the reduced benefit of lower income tax
rates in Poland.
The Companys net loss for the third quarter of 2009 was $(2,209), a decrease from $10,435 in net
income for the third quarter of 2008. Profitability decreased from the prior period due to the
lower sales combined with increases of $1,099 in pension costs, $631 in depreciation expense,
$1,090 in interest due to the inability to capitalize interest, $1,483 in early retirement
incentive costs, a reduction of $1,717 in by-product sales offset by a $780 income tax benefit.
The Companys contract backlog at September 30, 2009 was $475,566 in comparison to backlogs of
$672,550 and $628,754 at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Page 11 of 15
Table of Contents
In response to the lower net sales and accompanying reduction in net income, the Company has taken,
and continues to take, a number of steps to reduce its costs. These steps have included personnel
reductions, an early retirement program at one facility, temporary plant shutdowns, wage and hiring
freezes and other cost containment measures.
First Nine Months 2009 Compared to First Nine Months 2008
Net sales for the first nine months of 2009 were $266,616, a 25.3% reduction from the $356,917 of
net sales in the same period of 2008. The decrease in sales in the first nine months of 2009 is
due to the overall decline, both domestically and internationally, in the jet engine, aerospace and
industrial markets served by the Company. Gross profit was $18,383, or 6.9% of sales, in the first
nine months of 2009 compared to $48,521, or 13.6% of sales, in the same period in 2008. The
decline in gross profit in 2009 is due to reduced sales which diminished any incremental profit
opportunity, lower by-product sales, and higher expenses for pensions, depreciation and employment
reductions.
In the first nine months of 2009, selling, general and administrative expenses were $14,007, or
5.3% of net sales, in comparison to $15,321, or 4.3% of net sales, in the same period of 2008.
Although the total expense decreased by approximately $1,314 year over year, the percent of sales
increased due primarily to the 25.3% reduction in net sales and charges associated with employment
reductions.
Interest expense of $3,594 in the first nine months of 2009 was $2,576 higher than the charge for
the equivalent period of 2008. The increase in interest expense is due to the reduced amount of
capitalized interest in 2009 and an increased level of long-term debt in 2009 in contrast to 2008.
Pretax loss of $(183) in the first nine months of 2009 was a significant reduction from the $31,354
of pretax income in the same period of 2008. The reduction in pretax income in 2009 is due to the
reduced net sales and lower by-product sales along with increased interest, pension, depreciation,
and employment reduction expenses.
The year-to-date tax provision for 2008 was based on an annualized combined federal, state and
foreign effective rate of 27.6%, which differed from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% due
primarily to state income taxes, offset by the impact of lower income tax rates in Poland and the
benefits of the Domestic Production Activities deduction and a $5,304 tax credit from research and
development expenses incurred by the Company in prior years. In 2009, the Company had income tax
expense of $228 despite a year-to-date loss of $(183). This was due to domestic income tax expense
of $623, or 27.8%, based on domestic income of $2,245, only being partially offset by a foreign tax
benefit of $(395), or (16.3)%, based on foreign losses of $(2,428). The 2009 domestic effective
tax rate is less than the statutory federal tax rate of 35% due primarily to tax benefits
recognized in 2009 from the Chen-Tech acquisition.
Net loss for the first nine months of 2009 was $(359) versus $22,637 of net income, or 6.3% of
sales in 2008. The net income decrease in 2009 is the result of the 25.3% reduction in sales
combined with increases of $2,576 in interest expense, $1,770 in depreciation expense,
approximately $2,743 in expenses associated with employment reductions, $3,295 in pension expense
and a reduction of $8,002 in by-product sales.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys cash position as of September 30, 2009 was approximately $7,813 more than it was at
December 31, 2008. For the first nine months of 2009, the Company generated $48,254 of cash from
operating activities in contrast to $22,033 of cash from operations in the same period of 2008.
The Company utilized its additional cash flow in 2009 to reduce its short-term borrowing by $28,900
and to retire $1,660 of capital leases. The Company expended $10,946 and $40,193 of cash on
capital
expenditures in the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company expects capital
expenditures for the remainder of 2009 will be at a reduced level.
Page 12 of 15
Table of Contents
On July 20, 2001, the Company sold $30,000 of Series A Notes in a private placement to certain
institutional investors. The Series A Notes were unsecured and bore interest at a rate of 7.19%
per annum with the interest being paid semiannually. The Series A Notes had a seven-year duration
with the principal amortizing equally over the duration after the third year. Amortization payments
of $6,000 annually were made on July 20, 2004 through 2008, at which time the Series A Notes were
retired.
On May 16, 2006, the Company sold $40,000 of Series B Notes in a private placement to certain
institutional investors. The Series B Notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of 6.14% per
annum with interest being paid semiannually. The Series B Notes have a ten-year duration with the
principal amortizing equally over the duration after the fourth year.
On September 2, 2008, the Company sold $50,000 of Series C Notes in a private placement to certain
institutional investors. The Series C Notes are unsecured and bear interest at a rate of 6.41% per
annum with interest being paid semiannually. The Series C Notes have a seven-year duration with
the principal amortizing equally over the duration after the third year.
The Companys Series B and Series C Notes contain financial covenants which (a) limit the
incurrence of certain additional debt; (b) require a certain level of consolidated adjusted net
worth; (c) require a minimum fixed charges coverage ratio; and (d) require a limited amount of
funded debt to consolidated cash flow. The covenant on incurrence of additional debt limits funded
debt to 60% of total capitalization. At September 30, 2009, funded debt at Ladish was at 26% of
total capitalization. This covenant also limits priority debt to 20% of adjusted net worth.
Ladish had no priority debt at September 30, 2009. The covenant on adjusted net worth requires a
minimum of $111,306. At September 30, 2009, Ladish had $256,725 of adjusted net worth. The
covenant on fixed charges coverage ratio requires that consolidated cash flow to fixed charges be a
minimum of 2.00. The Companys fixed charges coverage ratio at September 30, 2009 was 5.88. The
final covenant on funded debt to consolidated cash flow allows for a maximum level of 4.00. At
September 30, 2009, the Companys actual level was 3.36. The Note Agreement for the Series B and
Series C Notes also contains customary representations and warranties and events of default.
At September 30, 2009, the Company was in compliance with all covenants in the Series B and Series
C Notes and the Facility.
In addition, the Company and a syndicate of lenders have entered into the Facility which was most
recently renewed on April 10, 2009. The Facility consists of a $35,000 unsecured revolving line of
credit which bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.00% or at a base rate. At September 30,
2009, there were no borrowings under the Facility and $35,000 of credit was available pursuant to
the terms of the Facility. The Facility has a maturity date of April 9, 2010.
On July 31, 2009, the Company and the syndicate of lenders participating in the Facility entered
into Amendment No. 1 to the Facility. This amendment, effective as of the date of execution,
modified the covenant on maximum indebtedness to EBITDA by deleting that covenant and substituting
in its place a covenant on minimum EBITDA. In addition, the lenders and the Company agreed to
modify the definition of EBITDA for this covenant by now allowing the Company to add back non-cash
charges to EBITDA.
The Facility also contains certain financial covenants which (a) require a minimum amount of
modified EBITDA and (b) require a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.7x. At September 30,
2009, the
Company was in compliance with the minimum modified EBITDA and had a fixed charge coverage ratio
of 7.19x. The Facility also contains customary representations and warranties and events of
default.
Page 13 of 15
Table of Contents
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had net deferred tax assets of $26,230
and $26,660, respectively. Realization of net deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company
generating sufficient taxable income in future periods. In determining that realization of net
deferred tax assets was more likely than not, the Company has given consideration to a number of
factors including its recent earnings history, expectations for earnings in the future, the timing
of reversal of temporary differences and tax planning strategies available to the Company. If, in
the future, the Company determines that it is no longer more likely than not that net deferred tax
assets will be realized, a valuation allowance will be established against all or part of the net
deferred tax assets with an offsetting charge to the income tax provision.
The Companys market capitalization at September 30, 2009 was $240,612. The increase in the
trading price of the Companys common stock is believed to be related to overall improvement in the
domestic equity markets and aerospace stocks in particular rather than any direct assessment of the
Company.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
The Company believes that its exposure to market risk related to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates and trade accounts receivable is immaterial as the vast majority of the Companys
sales are made in U.S. dollars. The Company does not consider itself subject to the market risks
addressed by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.
Any statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and involve risks and
uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives,
future financial performance, estimates, projections, goals and forecasts. Potential factors which
could cause the Companys actual results of operations to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements include:
| Market conditions and demand for the Companys products |
||
| Interest rates and capital costs |
||
| Unstable governments and business conditions in emerging
economies |
||
| Legal, regulatory and environmental issues |
||
| Health care costs |
||
| Competition |
||
| Technologies |
||
| Raw material and energy prices |
||
| Taxes |
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made. The
Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances after the date on which such statement is made.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
Under the direction of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the Company
has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of September 30, 2009. Based on that evaluation, the chief
executive officer and the chief financial officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
Page 14 of 15
Table of Contents
There were no significant changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting or in
other factors that could significantly affect these controls during the quarter ended September 30,
2009, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
No matters were submitted to a vote of the stockholders during the period covered by this report.
Item 5. Other Information |
None.
Item 6. Exhibits |
Exhibit 31.1 is the written statement of the chief executive officer of the Company certifying this
Form 10-Q complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibit 31.2 is the written statement of the chief financial officer of the Company certifying this
Form 10-Q complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibit 32.1 is the written statement of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of
the Company pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LADISH CO., INC. |
||||
Date: November 2, 2009 | By: | /s/ Wayne E. Larsen | ||
Wayne E. Larsen | ||||
Vice President Law/Finance & Secretary |
Page 15 of 15