Attached files

file filename
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - TALEO CORPdex312.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 - TALEO CORPdex321.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 - TALEO CORPdex311.htm
EX-23.1 - CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP - TALEO CORPdex231.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 10-K/A

Amendment No. 1

 

 

 

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 000-51299

 

 

TALEO CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   52-2190418

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

4140 Dublin Boulevard, Suite 400

Dublin, California 94568

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(925) 452-3000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Class A Common Stock, $0.00001 par value   The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.     Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2008 was approximately $475 million (based on the closing sale price of such shares on the Nasdaq Global Market on June 30, 2008). This calculation excludes the shares of Class A and Class B common stock held by executive officers and directors at June 30, 2008. This calculation does not reflect a determination that such persons are affiliates for any other purposes.

On April 15, 2009, the registrant had 31,151,102 shares of Class A common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The registrant has incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K portions of its Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

TALEO CORPORATION

FORM 10-K/A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  Explanatory Note Regarding Restatement   
  Forward-Looking Information   
PART I

ITEM 1

  Business    6

ITEM 1A

  Risk Factors    15

ITEM 1B

  Unresolved Staff Comments    30

ITEM 2

  Properties    30

ITEM 3

  Legal Proceedings    31

ITEM 4

  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holder    32
PART II

ITEM 5

  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities    32

ITEM 6

  Selected Financial Data    34

ITEM 7

  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    36

ITEM 7A

  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    50

ITEM 8

  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data    52

ITEM 9

  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure    106

ITEM 9A

  Controls and Procedures    106

ITEM 9B

  Other Information    107
PART III

ITEM 10

  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance    107

ITEM 11

  Executive Compensation    108

ITEM 12

  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters    108

ITEM 13

  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence    108

ITEM 14

  Principal Accounting Fees and Services    108
PART IV

ITEM 15

  Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules    108
Signatures    110

 

2


Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE REGARDING RESTATEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the “Amendment”) amends the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Taleo Corporation (referred to herein as the “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 30, 2009 (the “Original Filing”). This Amendment includes the restatement of the following previously-filed consolidated financial statements and data (and related disclosures) to correct an error in our accounting for stock-based compensation expense that resulted from an error in the prior version of the equity program administration software that we license from a third-party provider (the “Current Restatement”): (1) the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 contained in Part II, Item 8 of this Amendment; (2) the selected financial data as of and for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, located in Part II, Item 6 of this Amendment; (3) management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations as of and for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, contained in Part II, Item 7 of this Amendment; and (4) the unaudited quarterly financial information for each quarter in our fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 in Note 16, “Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Amendment. The Current Restatement results from our management’s determination subsequent to the issuance of our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 that there was an error in the measurement of stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009. In addition, in April 2009 we restated certain of our historical financial statements as a result of our review of revenue recognition practices (the “Prior Restatement”). The effect of the Prior Restatement was disclosed in the Original Filing. See below and Note 2, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for a detailed discussion of the effects of the restatements.

Financial information included in the reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K filed by us prior to October 27, 2009, and all earnings press releases and similar communications issued by us prior to October 27, 2009, should not be relied upon and are superseded in their entirety by this Amendment.

Current Restatement

In October 2009, we identified an error in our accounting for stock-based compensation expense after upgrading to a new version of the equity program administration software that we license from a third-party provider. The third-party provider has advised its users that the new version of the software corrects an error in the prior version with respect to the calculation of stock-based compensation expense. Specifically, the prior version of the software incorrectly calculated stock-based compensation expense by continuing to apply a weighted-average forfeiture rate to the vested portion of stock option awards until the grant’s final vest date, rather than reflecting actual forfeitures as awards vested, resulting in an understatement of stock-based compensation expense in certain periods prior to the grant’s final vest date. Our correction of the error results in changes to the timing of stock-based compensation expense over the vesting period of the awards during the relevant periods, but does not change the total stock-based compensation expense. As stock-based compensation expense is a non-cash item, there is no impact to net cash provided by operations in any period.

We determined that the cumulative stock-based compensation expense error related to the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 totaled $2.6 million. To correct the error, we have recorded increases in stock-based compensation expense of approximately $1.3 million in fiscal 2007, $1.2 million in fiscal 2006 and $0.3 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and we have recorded reductions in stock-based compensation expense of $0.1 million in fiscal 2008 and $0.1 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009.

Prior Restatement

In November 2008, we announced that our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, had requested that we re-evaluate whether our historical and then current practices with respect to the timing for recognition of application and consulting revenues were appropriate under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. As a result, we, under the direction of the Audit Committee, commenced a process to review the issues raised by our auditors to determine if an alternative accounting treatment should be adopted.

 

3


Table of Contents

In the course of our review, on February 23, 2009, we announced that our previously-issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the interim consolidated financial statements for the periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 would be restated to correct an item relating to the timing of revenue recognition for consulting services revenue under certain of our historical arrangements and a correction relating to the timing of revenue recognition for set-up fees, an element of our application services revenue, for all new arrangements entered into on or after January 1, 2006. In light of the restatement, we announced that our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and related auditors reports thereon, and our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, should no longer be relied upon.

In March 2009, we submitted a pre-clearance submission to the Office of the Chief Accountant (the “OCA”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The submission requested the OCA’s view regarding our historical application of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (“EITF 00-21”) to the timing of revenue recognition of our consulting services. Following consultations with the OCA regarding our submission, we determined to conclude our review of our revenue recognition practices and correct our historical application of accounting practices under EITF 00-21.

On March 23, 2009, we announced that we had completed our review and, as a result, would further restate certain previously-issued consolidated financial statements. Amounts in our previously issued financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003 through 2007, and the interim financial statements for each of the periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, would be corrected for the timing of revenue recognition for consulting services revenue during these periods, as well as to correct the previously announced correction relating to consulting services revenue recognition and the timing of revenue recognition for set-up fees. In light of the restatement, we announced that our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 through 2007 and related auditors reports thereon, and our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, should no longer be relied upon.

The Prior Restatement reflects the correction in our historical application of EITF 00-21. Historically, when application services and consulting services were sold together, we recognized consulting services revenue for certain of our arrangements as the services were delivered. Now, in similar arrangements, our consulting services revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the application services agreement, typically three years. The Prior Restatement resulted in the deferral to future periods of $18 million of consulting services revenue previously recognized through June 30, 2008, which was reflected in the Original Filing. The restatement also reflected our determination that, as of January 1, 2006, it would have been appropriate to recognize revenue from set-up fees over an expected attribution period of the longer of seven years or the contract term, rather than the typical three year term of our agreements, as had been our historical practice. Correction of this item resulted in approximately $0.2 million of application revenue from set-up fees previously recognized through June 30, 2008 being deferred to future periods, which was reflected in the Original Filing. See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 8 for further discussion of the Prior Restatement.

For more information regarding the restatements, refer to Part II, Item 7, “Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, and Note 2, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” and Note 16, “Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.

The following sections in this report have been amended as a result of the Current Restatement:

Part I:

Item 1: Business

Item 1A: Risk Factors

Part II:

Item 6: Selected Consolidated Financial Data

Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

4


Table of Contents

Item 9A: Controls and Procedures

Part IV:

Item 15: Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

For convenience of the reader, this Amendment sets forth the Original Filing in its entirety, as amended by and reflecting the Current Restatement. We have not modified or updated disclosures presented in the Original Filing, except as required to reflect the effects of the Current Restatement. Accordingly, this Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the filing date of the Original Filing and does not modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events, except as specifically referenced herein. References to the annual report on Form 10-K herein shall refer to this annual report on Form 10-K/A filed on October 27, 2009.

 

5


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This Form 10-K/A, including Part I, Item 1 — Business and Part II, Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements identify prospective information, particularly statements referencing our expectations regarding revenue and operating expenses, cost of revenue, tax and accounting estimates, cash, cash equivalents and cash provided by operating activities, the demand and expansion opportunities for our products, our customer base and our competitive position. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “would,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “forecast,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “is scheduled for,” “targeted,” and variations of such words and similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs, and assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict; therefore, actual results and outcomes may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in any such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include those set forth herein under Part I, Item 1A — Risk Factors or included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

We are a leading global provider of on-demand talent management software solutions. Our goal is to help our customers improve business results through better talent management. We offer recruiting, performance management, internal mobility, onboarding/new hire and other software solutions that help our customers attract and retain high quality talent, more effectively match workers’ skills to business needs, reduce the time and costs associated with manual and inconsistent processes, ease the burden of regulatory compliance, and increase workforce productivity through better alignment of workers’ goals and career plans with corporate objectives. In addition, our solutions are highly configurable, which allows our customers to implement talent management processes that are tailored to accommodate different employee types, locations, business units and regulatory environments.

We deliver our solutions on-demand as a hosted service that is accessed through an Internet connection and a standard web browser. Our solution delivery model, also called software-as-a-service or SaaS, eliminates the need for our customers to install and maintain hardware and software in order to use our solutions. We believe our SaaS model significantly reduces the time, cost and complexity associated with deployment of traditional, on-premise software solutions, and offers a lower upfront and total cost of ownership than traditional software solutions. We offer our solutions as a subscription-based service for which our customers pay a recurring annual or quarterly fee during the subscription term.

We market Taleo Enterprise Edition™, our suite of talent management solutions for larger, more complex organizations, through our direct sales force and indirectly through our strategic partners. We market Taleo Business Edition™, our suite of talent management solutions for smaller, less complex organizations, primarily through our inside sales team and Internet marketing efforts. As of December 31, 2008, our customer base included over 4,000 customers worldwide. Our customer base ranges in size from large, global organizations, including 48 of the Fortune 100 and 136 of the Fortune 500, to small, private companies with few employees.

On July 1, 2008 we completed our acquisition of Vurv Technology, Inc. (“Vurv”), a privately held company with headquarters in Florida. Vurv is a provider of on demand talent management software. The acquisition was our largest to date. See Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis on Financial Condition and Results from Operations” and Note 3 “Business Combinations and Dispositions” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.

We are a Delaware corporation and were incorporated in May 1999. We changed our name from Recruitsoft, Inc. to Taleo Corporation in March 2004 and completed our initial public offering in October 2005. Our principal executive offices are located at 4140 Dublin Boulevard, Suite 400, Dublin, California 94568. Our telephone number is (925) 452-3000, and our website is located at www.taleo.com.

The Talent Management Market

Talent management encompasses multiple complex processes with interconnected elements that together play a vital role in attracting, sourcing, assessing, hiring, developing and aligning human capital to our customers’ business objectives.

Most organizations no longer view human capital solely as an expense to be minimized, but instead as an asset to be optimized. This shift in thinking has mirrored the evolution of talent management from a manual, paper-based practice to a technology-enabled, organization-wide strategic business initiative.

 

6


Table of Contents

Over the past several years, organizations have implemented systems to automate many critical business functions. While this automation has generated large volumes of data and business information, the critical knowledge within organizations resides with its employees. Accordingly, much of the value of the organization resides in its human capital. To increase their return on investment in human capital, organizations have begun to shift their focus from traditional cost and time-per-hire metrics to more strategic considerations. These considerations include quality of hire, time-to-productivity, internal mobility, employee retention, employee engagement, and employee contribution measures. Systematically pursuing these goals increases overall workforce productivity by enabling talent to be more optimally assigned and redeployed to address business needs. A comprehensive, unified view of talent management requires solutions that not only automate discrete recruiting and performance management transactions, but also improve the effectiveness and consistency of recruiting and talent management processes through a more consistent competencies inventory management process, thereby increasing the quality of hire, employee retention, and productivity.

Our Software-as-a-Service Delivery Model

Our on-demand, software-as-a-service, delivery model enables our proprietary software solutions to be implemented, accessed and used by our customers remotely through an Internet connection , a standard web browser and a variety of other access points such as smart phones, hand- held devices, and productivity tools, like Microsoft Outlook. Our solutions are hosted and maintained by us, thus eliminating for our customers the time, risk, headcount and costs associated with installing and maintaining applications within their own information technology infrastructures. As a result, our solutions require less initial investment in third-party software, hardware and implementation services, and have lower ongoing support costs than traditional enterprise software. The SaaS model also allows advanced information technology infrastructure management, security, disaster recovery and other best practices to be leveraged by smaller customers that might not otherwise be able to implement such practices in their own information technology environments. Our solutions were designed and developed for delivery via the SaaS model from our inception. Our SaaS delivery model also enables us to take advantage of operational efficiencies. Since updates and upgrades to our solutions are managed by us on behalf of our customers, we are able to implement improvements to our solutions in a more rapid and uniform way. As a result, we are required to support fewer old versions of our solutions. This allows our development resources to focus more effort on innovative new products.

Our SaaS delivery model, coupled with our subscription-based license model, effectively replaces the large, front-loaded cost, typical of most traditional enterprise software deployments, with a lower risk, pay-as-you-go model. We believe the SaaS model is well suited to the talent management market in which we operate.

Our Products

We offer two suites of talent management solutions: Taleo Enterprise Edition and Taleo Business Edition. Taleo Enterprise Edition is designed for larger, more complex organizations and provides support for unified, end-to-end talent management processes ranging from sourcing, recruiting and onboarding to performance management, goals management, development planning and succession planning. Most recently we have begun to offer compensation management solutions, through our alliance with Worldwide Compensation, Inc., a company in which we made an equity investment in September 2008. Taleo Business Edition is designed for smaller, less complex organizations, stand-alone departments and divisions of larger organizations, and staffing companies. Our solutions are designed to address multiple worker types, including professional and hourly, with support for multiple languages as well as differing geographic and cultural requirements.

Our solutions are accessed through intuitive role-specific user interfaces, which allows only the content and functionality relevant to a specific user — whether a candidate, current employee, corporate recruiter, agency, line manager or system administrator — to be easily accessed by that user. The candidate-facing portions of Taleo Enterprise Edition solutions are available in 27 languages. Taleo Business Edition is currently available in 4 languages.

Taleo Enterprise Edition

Taleo Enterprise Edition includes two distinct product sets, Taleo Recruiting and Taleo Performance, built on a common platform.

Taleo Recruiting

Taleo Recruiting consists of two core solution offerings and add-on modules that enable larger, more complex organizations to acquire talent. Our two core Taleo Recruiting solution offerings are:

Taleo Professional™ enables organizations to manage professional, non-hourly talent management functions, including attracting and evaluating candidates and employees, matching skills against job opportunities, and candidate relationship

 

7


Table of Contents

management. Taleo Professional provides a configurable career site through which candidates may view and apply for open positions or submit a profile for future opportunities, many-to-many matching of all candidates and employees against available job opportunities, and the ability to structure variable workflows for different types of workers, locations, workgroups and regulatory environments.

Taleo Hourly™ provides end-to-end process automation for recruiting, selecting and hiring hourly employees. Taleo career sites allow candidates to search for jobs by location or radius from zip/postal codes, and capture skills and experience, plus information key to hourly hiring such as shift availability, references and certifications. Tailored candidate application flows include automated prescreening, with knock-out capabilities. Hiring features include full applicant tracking, reporting and collection of country-specific diversity data for compliance.

The additional modules that we offer to complement our core Taleo Recruiting product offerings include:

Taleo Agency™ allows organizations to directly link with third party staffing agencies, and provides tools to help streamline agency management and optimize agency spend.

Taleo Assessment™ enables organizations to make assessment tests part of their online application and selection process, and automatically incorporates assessment results into the candidate’s profile.

Taleo Campus™ automates the campus recruiting process with tools for attracting, engaging and hiring top collegiate candidates.

Taleo Compliance™ provides a foundation to support certain regulatory requirements relevant to talent management, including certain requirements promulgated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the U.S. Department of Labor and other regulatory bodies.

Taleo Onboarding™ automates activities related to onboarding newly hired employees in order to streamline the transition from candidate to productive new employee while reducing paperwork and improving compliance.

Taleo Scheduling Center TM enables self-service candidate scheduling for interviews.

Taleo TalentReach™ provides candidate relationship management, or CRM, tools and advanced search and sourcing tools to enable organizations to reach hard-to-find talent and build a strong talent pipeline. The module is provided pursuant to a reseller arrangement with AIRS Human Capital Solutions, Inc., or AIRS, and is developed and hosted by AIRS.

Taleo Verify™ enables organizations to submit candidates for background screening from our solutions. Background screening services for this offering are provided by Verified Person, Inc.

Taleo Workforce Mobility™ supports mobility and retention initiatives by providing tools to enable increased visibility into internal job openings, employee capabilities and career preferences.

Taleo Performance

Taleo Performance consists of four core solution offerings that enable larger, more complex organizations to better align internal advancement with corporate objectives, develop career plans to increase retention and address succession. Our four core Taleo Performance solution offerings are:

Taleo Career & Development Planning™ helps employees and managers create focused and dynamic career and development plans to improve individual performance and increase retention.

Taleo Goals Management™ helps clients to better manage business outcomes by automating the creation, alignment and monitoring of organizational goals.

Taleo Performance Management™ provides tools to help transform traditional employee assessment from an annual event to an ongoing, business-driven, evaluation and process improvement tool.

Taleo Succession Planning™ provides access to a complete view of available, qualified talent and helps identify the best candidates to deliver on business goals.

Talent Management Platform Modules

Our talent management platform modules may be used in combination with the Taleo Recruiting and Taleo Performance product suites. These modules help organizations gain strategic visibility across all of their talent management solutions and integrate our products to other systems.

 

8


Table of Contents

Taleo Analytics™ gives customers a tool to gain strategic insights into their talent management practices through the metrics configuration tool standard analytics dashboards, and dashboard authoring tools.

Taleo Anywhere™ provides access to Taleo through many alternative platforms, such as devices like Blackberry, smartphones, common productivity tools like Microsoft Outlook and browsers like Internet Explorer, and through alternate Web 2.0 means such as RSS feeds.

Taleo Connect™ uses a services-oriented integration framework to enable self-service configuration as well as Taleo-managed integrations between our solutions and other systems.

Taleo Passport™ offers pre-built integrations with certified solution partners for background checks, assessments, tax credit screening and more.

Taleo Reporting™ offers tools to measure, analyze and optimize organizations’ talent processes with standard reports and advanced report writing tools.

Taleo Business Edition

Taleo Business Edition includes two distinct product sets, Taleo Recruit and Taleo Perform, built on a common platform.

Taleo Recruit™ facilitates an organizations employee recruiting process. Taleo Recruit offers three service options that enable small businesses to acquire talent. The user interface allows users to create a customer specific talent management system with configurable objects, fields, layouts, views, workflow, reports and integration. Our Taleo Business Edition service options are:

Taleo Business Edition — Standard™ makes all the functionality of the Personal service offering available to recruiting departments and teams. Additional features include interview management and agency access.

Taleo Business Edition — Plus™ offers a comprehensive hiring management suite to help organizations manage their entire staffing operations, including applications for candidate and requisition management, account and contact management, careers website management, employee referrals management and reporting and analysis.

Taleo Business Edition — Premium™ contains all the benefits of Taleo Business Edition Plus, and, in addition, provides up to 250 custom fields, custom “ad-hoc” reporting, multiple career websites and application forms and local time zone and other local settings.

Taleo Perform™ allows companies to define and monitor the full employee review cycle. Managers can initiate the review process and support employee self appraisals, manager assessments, and multi-rater reviews. Our goals management module allows managers to establish quantitative and qualitative employee goals, and align employee goals to broader company goals. A secure employee portal enables employees to submit self-assessments online and provides access to basic employee data, company messaging, assigned goals, and performance reviews.

Technology

Our Software Applications

Our Taleo Enterprise Edition solutions reside on a common technology platform. Our component-based platform includes reporting and analytics capabilities, self-service integration and configuration tools, our proprietary method for contextualizing the user experience based upon a variety of organizational, location and job function attributes (which we refer to as our SmartOrg feature), the Talent Master Structured Data Platform (described in further detail below), and global language and currency capabilities. Because Taleo Recruiting and Taleo Performance share a common, native platform, we can provide clients superior interoperability between applications and a unified view of all talent management information. The self-service tools and SmartOrg make our solutions configurable for complex operations, giving companies enterprise-wide data and process consistency while being able to adapt the solution locally according to the organization, location, applicable laws, local staffing model, types of hires and internal mobility requirements.

The Talent Master Structured Data Platform maintains all employee, candidate, job and performance data elements required by our solutions. The data structure within the Talent Master Structured Data Platform includes information on skills, competencies, experience, behaviors and level of interest in a skill or competency that can be matched precisely to job requirements and business plans. The Talent Master Structured Data Platform enables organizations to inventory and search the skills of its external candidates

 

9


Table of Contents

and current employees in a common format to help managers and recruiters to decide between internal and external hires for new business initiatives, measure skills gaps in the existing workforce and prepare succession plans using both internal and external talent profiles.

Our Taleo Enterprise software applications are written in Java and use Oracle as the relational database management system.

Our Taleo Business Edition solutions reside on a common technology platform that is separate from the Taleo Enterprise Edition platform. The Taleo Business Edition platform enables us to deliver superior usability and functionality focused on small and medium businesses, and allows for predictive modeling throughout the talent management lifecycle. Self-service tools within the platform provide standard and custom reporting and the ability to configure all Taleo Business Edition modules. The common platform also allows users to localize language and currency across the modules and within the configurable career websites and employee portals. It exposes all data through a standard open web service for integration, allowing customers to integrate Taleo Business Edition with any third party software application that accepts such standard protocols. These self -service configuration and integration tools, together with pre-configured templates for specific industry verticals, enable our small and midsize customers to use Taleo Business Edition for both simple and complex talent management operations.

Our Taleo Business Edition software applications are written in Java and use Microsoft SQL Server® as the relational database management system.

Our On-Demand Infrastructure

Our technology infrastructure is designed to achieve high levels of security, scalability, performance and availability. We use commercially available hardware in our data centers. Our software and hardware architecture runs on the Linux operating system and uses some proprietary and commercially available software as well as open-source software components for enhanced reliability and a scalable and secure computing environment which can accommodate exponential transaction load increases. Our secure Internet facing infrastructure includes load balancing and secure socket layer offloading devices, anti-virus appliances and technology that allows us to detect and prevent unauthorized access. Our tiered and virtualized application architecture specializes systems and application functions on dedicated servers for web, application, search, reporting, computing utilities, database and storage services. Each server tier is designed with redundancy, which allows us to extend systems and application capacity and availability on demand. All of our equipment and systems are remotely operated, monitored and managed by our personnel working on a 24/7 schedule. Key production technology specialists are also on call at all times on a rotating basis. Our monitoring technology uses industry leading system monitoring and performance monitoring tools and we have also developed our own customized monitoring tools for added insight into the performance and availability of our systems.

We provide a highly secure computing environment as well as high application availability. Each customer is provided with its own secure application instance (which we refer to as a Zone). Each customer Zone includes its own logical and physical database schema, text translation management, configuration settings, tools for custom reporting and defining custom integration processes. Customers share infrastructure at all levels. The scalable design of the software and hardware infrastructure allows us to deploy customer Zones horizontally across any number of servers and load balance user sessions to ensure continuous availability and high performance of applications. Our business continuity measures include daily incremental database backups to disk with recovery capabilities in any of our datacenters and weekly automated tape backups, which we store off-site on encrypted tapes with a secure third party provider.

We currently deliver our solutions from nine data centers that host the applications for all of our customers.

The Taleo Enterprise platform is hosted from three facilities: a U.S. facility leased from Equinix, Inc. in San Jose, California, a U.S. facility leased from Internap Network Services Corporation in New York City, New York and a Netherlands data center facility also leased from Equinix in Amsterdam. Internet bandwidth and access is provided by Internap in the two U.S. facilities and by Equinix in the Netherlands.

The Taleo Business Edition is hosted through two U.S. facilities: a facility located in San Jose, California and operated via a managed services arrangement and a facility located in San Francisco, California to host the legacy Vurv product for small and medium-sized organizations. Opsource, Inc. provides hardware, internet bandwidth, and access in the San Jose, California hosting facility through the managed services arrangement.

The Vurv legacy enterprise recruiting product is hosted through four facilities: a facility located in Jacksonville, Florida in the U.S., a facility located in Atlanta, Georgia in the U.S., a facility located in London, England and a facility located in Sydney, Australia. Internet bandwidth and access for the Vurv legacy enterprise recruiting product is provided by Peak 10 in the Florida facility, Adapt PLC in the England facility, and Conexim Australia Pty Ltd in the Australia facility.

Over time we expect to consolidate several of the data centers hosting Vurv legacy products into existing data centers hosting the Taleo Enterprise platform.

 

10


Table of Contents

Each location provides highly secure 24/7 manned facilities with cage environments, redundant power and cooling systems with on-site backup power generators, multi-layered access using access card/PIN code for authentication.

Professional Services

Our professional services organization leverages our consultants’ and educators’ domain expertise and our proprietary methodologies to provide implementation services, solution optimization services, technical services and training services that help our customers maximize their return on investment. We also subcontract or refer consulting engagements or portions of consulting engagements to our third-party implementation partners from time to time.

Taleo Services Methodologies

We have developed methodologies that enable us to accelerate the deployment of our solutions across a variety of industries and talent management environments:

Taleo Implementation Methodology. Working with Fortune 500 companies, we developed methods to optimize critical business processes, while maintaining the integrity of our customers’ business drivers. The Taleo Implementation Methodology addresses specific staffing and performance management processes for position management, requisition management, candidate management, collaborative workflow, new hire on-boarding review, performance appraisals, goals management, career management and succession planning. Our Taleo Enterprise Edition consultants work with our customers to implement our solutions by mapping solution workflows and best practices to the organization’s structure, business requirements, and processes, and ultimately configuring a skills-based platform for complete talent management configured uniquely for each customer.

Talent Practices Knowledge Base. Our talent practices knowledge base (which we call “Green Pages”) enables us to understand an organization’s overall talent management environment, including internal and external business drivers, talent management models, hire types and talent management processes and to recommend best practices to optimize talent management processes. Green Pages is a searchable database of descriptions of the complex enterprise talent management challenges faced within different industries and geographies. Green Pages also provides specific details of the solutions our consultants implemented to address these challenges, and the results obtained. This knowledge base reflects years of talent management experience across a wide variety of industries. Our consultants use the collective data from our knowledge base to help our new customers solve their complex talent management challenges, and to help our existing customers hone their talent management practices and processes.

Implementation Services

Our Taleo Enterprise Edition implementation services begin with a complete evaluation of a customer’s current talent management practices. Services include process definition, to determine the configuration of the solutions, and integration with existing applications to fit each organization’s dynamic business requirements. We have a dedicated project management office that equips our consultants with a library of toolkits, forms, training documentation and workshop templates. The project management office also audits active customer engagements quarterly to help ensure consistent quality.

Solution Optimization and Expansion

We provide ongoing solution optimization and expansion services to help our customers achieve desired results in quality improvement, increased productivity, cost savings and operational effectiveness after the initial deployment of our solution. We work with our customers to measure improvement in their talent management processes and we modify and expand configuration of our solutions to increase their effectiveness, when necessary. In collaboration with customer project leaders, we establish an ongoing process for continual evolution and solution optimization. Using this process, our customers can promote best practice usage and end user adoption after our solutions have been deployed.

Technical Services

We offer comprehensive technical services to help our customers integrate our solutions with other third-party solutions within our customers’ system portfolios. Many of our Taleo Enterprise Edition clients leverage our technical expertise to assist with technical engagements such as data conversion, ongoing data interfaces, single sign-on for internal users, third-party integration and technical readiness assessments. We also provide services to identify and develop reports and dashboards using our advanced reporting technology. We work with our clients in various ways, from knowledge transfer to help them better use our self-service technology, to full-service, on-site implementation projects.

 

11


Table of Contents

Training

Through Taleo University, we offer a full range of educational services to foster customer self-sufficiency. These services include: pre-deployment classroom training, train-the-trainer programs, system administrator training, post-deployment specialty training, upgrade training and a full catalogue of interactive, self-study eLearning/web-based training courses. We also offer a variety of training tools to drive user adoption, including solution user manuals, process user guides, feature training exercises, a self-service website for training scheduling and registration, post-training assessment and certification, and both synchronous and asynchronous web-based training options for remote users. Our solutions are designed to meet the requirements of customers of various sizes, and we measure all training engagements for quality and customer satisfaction.

Customer Support

Our global customer support organization provides both proactive and customer-initiated support. We deliver our multilingual technical assistance via telephone, e-mail and our web-based customer care portal, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Our customer support organization tracks all customer support requests and reports the status of these requests to the user through our customer support portal, enabling users to know the status of their support requests, the person responsible for resolving them, and the targeted timing and process for resolution. Our senior executives review customer satisfaction reports and support and response metrics and take action when necessary to ensure that we maintain a high level of customer satisfaction.

Our Growth Strategy

Our objective is to become the leading global provider of unified talent management solutions. Key elements of our strategy include:

Extend our Technology Leadership. We believe we have established advanced technological capabilities and competitive advantages through our component-based and service oriented architectures. Our advanced technologies have enabled us to develop our solutions on a common, native and strategic talent management platform. We intend to leverage our experience and our internal and third-party development resources to continue to develop our technology platform, infrastructure and applications to capitalize on new technologies and methodologies, such as Web 2.0 design principles, to capitalize on the talent management market opportunity.

Develop the Taleo Talent Grid. We plan to leverage our technology to develop the Taleo Talent Grid which will enable our customers to access a broad variety of talent and talent management services, solutions and expertise from their Taleo application. Candidates, partners, talent management experts and complementary solution providers will be able to plug into the Taleo Talent Grid through our open integration platform and online communities. Throughout 2009, we plan to develop three online communities for our customers: the Taleo Knowledge Exchange, Talent Exchange, and Solution Exchange. Our customers will be able to access all three communities to share knowledge with each other on Taleo solutions and talent management best practices through the Taleo Knowledge Exchange, find and engage with the talent they need through the Taleo Talent Exchange, and research solution and Taleo alliance partners through the Taleo Solution Exchange.

Expand our Solution Offerings. We plan to continue to expand our suite of talent management solutions beyond our most recent launch of Taleo Performance to deliver additional functionality that we can sell to our customer base and to new customers. We will continue this expansion through our internal development initiatives and we may also pursue strategic acquisitions.

Expand our Multinational Presence. We believe the increasing globalization of large organizations provides us with substantial opportunities to capitalize on our leadership in global deployments. We intend to expand our efforts to deploy our solutions to more organizations that are based outside of North America. We also intend to continue to enhance our multinational functionality and to expand our investment in our international operations to support organizations of all sizes globally.

Expand our Target Market Opportunity. We intend to continue to expand and better serve our potential customer base by tailoring solutions and service offerings to meet the needs of specific vertical markets and mid-sized businesses of varying complexities, in addition to our existing solutions and service offerings for larger, global and smaller organizations. We intend to implement marketing campaigns targeted to the needs and requirements of each of these segments of the talent management market.

Customers

As of December 31, 2008, our customer base included over 4,000 customers worldwide, including 48 of the Fortune 100. We market our Taleo Enterprise Edition solutions to larger, more complex organizations, typically with more than 3,000 employees. We market our Taleo Business Edition solutions to smaller, less complex organizations, typically with fewer than 3,000 employees. Our

 

12


Table of Contents

customers include organizations in the business services, consumer goods, energy, financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, technology, transportation, government and retail sectors, and range in size from smaller, private companies to large, global corporations with more than 300,000 employees. No single customer has accounted for more than ten percent of our revenue or accounts receivable in any of the last three years.

Sales and Marketing

We sell subscriptions to our solutions through our global direct sales force and through our strategic partners. Our direct sales organization has field sales professionals in metropolitan areas throughout the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia and Singapore. Our Taleo Enterprise Edition direct sales force consists of regional sales managers, solutions consultants and business development representatives that sell our solutions to new customers. We also maintain a separate team of account executives that focuses on renewing and selling new solutions and services to existing Taleo Enterprise Edition customers. In addition, we have developed partnerships and direct sales relationships with business process outsourcing, or BPO, human resources outsourcing, or HRO, and recruitment process outsourcing, or RPO, providers. Our BPO, HRO and RPO partners use our solutions to manage talent management for their customers as part of their broader human resource offerings. Our Taleo Business Edition offerings are sold primarily through an inside sales team and through our website.

Our marketing programs are designed to increase awareness of our solutions within our target markets and enhance the perception of our brand. Our marketing initiatives include market research, product and strategy updates with industry analysts, public relations activities, web marketing, direct mail and relationship marketing programs, seminars, industry specific trade shows, speaking engagements and cooperative marketing with customers and partners. Our marketing team generates qualified leads and provides programs for prospects and customers that build awareness and generate demand for our existing solutions as well as new products and services. Our marketing department also produces materials that include brochures, data sheets, white papers, presentations, demonstrations, and other marketing tools on our corporate website. We also generate awareness through electronic and print advertising in trade magazines, websites, search engines, seminars, and direct customer and partner events.

Research and Development

Our research and development organization consists of product management and development employees. Our research and development organization is primarily located in Quebec City, Canada and Jacksonville, Florida. We also have development staff in Dublin, California and other locations. We use independent development firms or contractors for portions of our development related work, with current research and development efforts occurring in Budapest, Hungary, and Kiev, Ukraine. Our development methodology allows us to implement flexible development cycles that result in more timely and efficient delivery of new solutions and enhancements to existing solutions. We focus our research and development efforts on improving and enhancing our existing solution offerings as well as developing new solutions. The responsibilities of our research and development organization include product management, product development, and software maintenance. We allocate a portion of our research and development budget to the development of our technology platform, including our Talent Master Structured Data Platform (discussed above) and the platform underlying the configuration capabilities of our solutions (what we refer to as Configurable Staffing Process Platform). Our research and development expenditures, net of tax credits we received from the Government of Quebec, are expensed as incurred and totaled $31.0 million, $23.2 million, and $19.7 million in 2008, 2007, and 2006 respectively .

Competition

The market for talent management solutions is highly competitive and rapidly evolving. We believe that the principal competitive factors in this market include:

 

   

Product performance and functionality;

 

   

Breadth and depth of functionality;

 

   

Ease of implementation and use;

 

   

Security and data privacy;

 

   

Ability to integrate with third-party solutions;

 

   

Scalability and reliability;

 

   

Company reputation; and

 

   

Price.

 

13


Table of Contents

We believe that we compete favorably with respect to these factors. Our Taleo Enterprise Edition solutions compete with vendors of enterprise resource planning software such as Oracle Corporation and SAP AG, and also with vendors such as ADP, Authoria, Cezane, Cornerstone OnDemand, HRSmart, Jobpartners, Kenexa, Kronos, Neogov, Peopleclick, Pilat, Plateau, Salary.com, Stepstone, SuccessFactors, Technomedia, TEDS, Workday, and Workstream, that offer products and services that compete with one or more modules in our Taleo Enterprise Edition suite of solutions. Our Taleo Business Edition solution competes primarily with Bullhorn, Hiredesk, Halogen Software, iCIMs, Neogov, Monster.com, Silkroad, Virtual Edge from ADP and certain of the vendors listed in the previous sentence.

Our current and potential competitors include large, multi-national companies such as Oracle and SAP who have a larger installed base of users, longer operating histories, greater name recognition and substantially greater technical marketing and financial resources. In addition, we compete with smaller companies who may adapt better to changing conditions in the market. Our competitors may develop products or services that will be superior to our products, or that will achieve greater market acceptance.

Intellectual Property

Our success is dependent in part on our ability to protect our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of trademark, copyright and trade secret laws in the United States and other jurisdictions as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary technology, services methodology and brand. We have registered trademarks for certain of our products and services and will continue to evaluate the registration of additional trademarks as appropriate. We also enter into confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements with our employees, consultants and other third parties and control access to software, documentation and other proprietary information. However, we do not have any issued patents, we have one pending patent, and existing copyright laws afford only limited protection.

Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of our products or to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary information. In addition, we cannot be certain that others will not develop substantially equivalent or superior proprietary technology, or that equivalent products will not be marketed in competition with our products, thereby substantially reducing the value of our proprietary rights. Furthermore, confidentiality agreements between us and our employees or any license agreements with our clients may not provide meaningful protection of our proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use or disclosure of it. In addition, the laws of certain countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Accordingly, the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate and we may not be able to protect our proprietary software in the United States or abroad against unauthorized third party copying or use, which could significantly harm our business.

In addition, we license third-party technologies that are incorporated into some elements of our services. Licenses from third-party technologies may not continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost, or at all.

Taleo is a registered trademark in the United States, European Union, Australia, Canada and Singapore and in various other jurisdictions.

Employees

As of December 31, 2008, we had 878 employees. None of our employees is represented by a collective bargaining agreement and we have never experienced a strike or similar work stoppage. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

 

14


Table of Contents

Business Combinations

Over the past three years, we expanded our market share, acquired new technology or supplemented our technology by purchasing businesses and assets focused in the talent management market. During this time period, we acquired the following businesses:

 

Date of Closing

  

Company

  

Details

July 1, 2008    Vurv Technology, Inc. (“Vurv”)    The Vurv acquisition enhanced our solutions with the Vurv talent management solution, and provided new customer relationships and intellectual property.
July 3, 2007    Wetfeet, Inc. (“Wetfeet”)    Taleo acquired certain assets associated with the Wetfeet hiring management solution, including customer contracts, from Wetfeet, Inc. and its parent Universum Communications Holdings, Inc.
March 7, 2007    JobFlash, Inc. (“JobFlash”)    Taleo acquired certain assets of JobFlash, Inc., including customer contracts and intellectual property related to hourly hiring management, scheduling management and voice recognition tools for hiring management. The assets acquired provided the basis for our Taleo Scheduling Center solution, Taleo Voice Response and hourly hiring management tools for our Taleo Business Edition solution.

Available Information

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to reports furnished or filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available, free of charge, on the “Investor Relations” section of our website (www.taleo.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information available on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not part of this report. The public may also read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding us that we file electronically with the SEC.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Because of the following factors, as well as other variables affecting our operating results and financial condition, past performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods.

We have a history of losses, and we cannot be certain that we will achieve or sustain profitability.

With the exception of the year ended December 31, 2007, we have incurred annual losses in every year since our inception. As of December 31, 2008 we had incurred aggregate net losses of $64.5 million, which is our accumulated deficit of $78.3 million less $13.8 million of dividends and issuance costs on preferred stock. In the year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred losses of $8.1 million. We cannot be certain that we will be able to achieve or sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. As we continue to incur costs associated with regulatory compliance and being a public company and implement initiatives to grow our business, which include, among other things, acquisitions, international expansion and new product development, any failure to increase revenue or manage our cost structure could prevent us from achieving or sustaining profitability. As a result, our business could be harmed and our stock price could decline. In the year ended December 31, 2008, we incurred losses largely as a result of expenses and charges associated with our recent acquisition of Vurv Technology, Inc. on July 1, 2008. In the near term, we expect to incur losses as a result of the increased amortization expense associated with the acquisition of Vurv. Also, expenses for a significant portion of our consulting services are recognized in advance of the recognition of revenue associated with the same consulting services, as revenue is deferred to future periods and recognized ratably over the term of the related application services agreement, while the expense associated with such consulting services are recognized in the period incurred. Accordingly, if our consulting services business grows, we may experience a negative impact on profitability. In addition, we may incur losses as a result of revenue shortfalls or increased expenses associated with our business. As a result, our business could be harmed and our stock price could decline.

Unfavorable economic conditions and reductions in information technology spending could limit our ability to grow our business.

Our operating results may vary based on the impact of changes in economic conditions globally and within the industries in which our customers operate. The revenue growth and profitability of our business depends on the overall demand for enterprise

 

15


Table of Contents

application software and services. Our revenue is derived from organizations whose businesses may fluctuate with global economic and business conditions. Historically, economic downturns have resulted in overall reductions in corporate information technology spending. Accordingly, the current downturn in global economic conditions may weaken demand for our software and services. In addition, an economic decline impacting a particular industry may negatively impact demand for our software and services in the affected industry. Many of the industries we serve, including financial services, technology and retail, have recently suffered a downturn in economic and business conditions and may continue to do so. A softening of demand for enterprise application software and services, and in particular enterprise talent management solutions, caused by a weakening global economy or economic downturn in a particular sector would adversely effect our business and likely cause a decline in our revenue.

We will likely experience longer sales cycles and increased pricing pressure as a result of unfavorable economic conditions.

If general economic conditions worsen or fail to improve, we will likely continue to experience the conditions that began in the first quarter of 2008 of increased delays in our sales cycles and increased pressure from prospective customers to offer discounts on software subscriptions and consulting services higher than our historical practices. We may also experience increased pressure from existing customers to renew expiring software subscriptions agreements at lower rates. In addition, certain of our customers may attempt to negotiate lower software subscription fees for existing arrangements because of downturns in their businesses. If we choose to accept certain request for higher discounts or lower fees, our business may be adversely affected and our revenues may decline. We also believe certain of our competitors may offer lower fees for their products and services as a result of the current economic environment, which may put further downward pressure on our fees. Additionally, certain of our customers may become bankrupt or insolvent as a result of the current economic downturn, and we may lose all revenue from such customers.

We may not successfully integrate Vurv’s business operations with our own. As a result, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits of our acquisition, which could adversely affect our operating results and cause the price of our common stock to decline.

On July 1, 2008, we completed our acquisition of Vurv Technology, Inc, our largest acquisition to date. We have limited experience in integrating an acquired company, and successful integration of Vurv’s business operations will place an additional burden on our management and infrastructure. Our acquisition of Vurv subjects us to a number of risks, including the following:

 

   

we may have difficulty renewing former Vurv customers at the expiration of their current agreements;

 

   

we may be unable to convert certain Vurv customers—including in particular those that previously entered into perpetual licenses and customer on-premise hosting arrangements—to the Taleo platform and our vendor hosted, subscription model;

 

   

we may find it difficult to support or migrate Vurv customers that are using specific customized versions of the Vurv software to our solutions, as we historically have maintained a single version of each release of our software applications without customer-specific code customization;

 

   

we may have difficultly identifying and correcting deficiencies in Vurv’s internal controls over financial reporting;

 

   

we terminated a significant number of Vurv employees in connection with the acquisition, and may have difficulty retaining key Vurv employees over time;

 

   

we will incur additional expense to maintain and support the Vurv product lines for up to three years while customers are migrated to the Taleo platform;

 

   

we may find it difficult to integrate Vurv’s hosting infrastructure and operations with our own hosting operations;

 

   

Jacksonville, Florida may be more expensive or less productive than we anticipate as a software development and support location; and

 

   

we may not have sufficient cash balances to fund other investments that become available to us over time as a result of our decreased cash balance due to the cash consideration paid in connection with the acquisition, or we may be required to seek additional sources of funding in order to make new investments.

There can be no assurance that we will be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with our acquisition of Vurv. To the extent that we are unable to successfully manage these risks, our business, operating results, or financial condition could be adversely affected, and the price of our common stock could decline.

 

16


Table of Contents

Because we recognize revenue over the term of the agreement for our software subscriptions and for a significant portion of our consulting service agreements, a significant downturn in our business may not be reflected immediately in our operating results, or our consulting revenue reported for a particular period may not be indicative of trends in our consulting business, which increases the difficulty of evaluating our future financial position.

We generally recognize revenue from software subscription agreements ratably over the terms of these agreements, which are typically three or more years for our Taleo Enterprise Edition customers and one year for our Taleo Business Edition customers. As a result, a substantial majority of our software subscription revenue in each quarter is generated from software subscription agreements entered into during prior periods. Consequently, a decline in new software subscription agreements in any one quarter may not affect our results of operations in that quarter but will reduce our revenue in future quarters. Additionally, the timing of renewals or non-renewals of a software subscription agreement during any one quarter may also affect our financial performance in that particular quarter. For example, because we recognize revenue ratably, the non-renewal of a software subscription agreement late in a quarter will have very little impact on revenue for that quarter, but will reduce our revenue in future quarters. Accordingly, the effect of significant declines in sales and market acceptance of our solutions may not be reflected in our short-term results of operations, which would make these reported results less indicative of our future financial results. By contrast, a non-renewal occurring early in a quarter may have a significant negative impact on revenue for that quarter and we may not be able to offset a decline in revenue due to such non-renewals with revenue from new software subscription agreements entered into in the same quarter. In addition, we may be unable to adjust our costs in response to reduced revenue.

Additionally, when we sell software subscriptions and consulting services in a single arrangement, we recognize revenue from consulting services ratably over the term of the software subscription agreement, which is typically three or more years, rather than as the consulting services are delivered, which is typically during the first six to nine months of a software subscription agreement. Accordingly, a significant portion of the revenue for consulting services performed in any quarterly reporting period will be deferred to future periods. As a result, our consulting revenue for any quarterly reporting period may not be reflective of the consulting services delivered during the reporting period or of the business trends with respect to our consulting services business. Further, since we recognize expenses related to our consulting services in the period in which the expenses are incurred, the consulting margins we report in any quarterly reporting period may not be indicative of the actual gross margin on consulting services delivered during the reporting period.

If our existing customers do not renew their software subscriptions and buy additional solutions from us, our business will suffer.

We expect to continue to derive a significant portion of our revenue from renewal of software subscriptions and, to a lesser extent, service fees from our existing customers. As a result, maintaining the renewal rate of our software subscriptions is critical to our future success. Factors that may affect the renewal rate for our solutions include:

 

   

the price, performance and functionality of our solutions;

 

   

the availability, price, performance and functionality of competing products and services;

 

   

the effectiveness of our maintenance and support services;

 

   

our ability to develop complementary products and services; and

 

   

the stability, performance and security of our hosting infrastructure and hosting services.

Most of our Taleo Enterprise Edition customers enter into software subscription agreements with a duration of three years or more from the initial contract date. Most of our Taleo Business Edition customers enter into annual software subscription agreements. Our customers have no obligation to renew their subscriptions for our solutions after the expiration of the initial term of their agreements. In addition, our customers may negotiate terms less advantageous to us upon renewal, which may reduce our revenue from these customers, or may request that we license our software to them on a perpetual basis, which may, after we have ratably recognized the revenue for the perpetual license over the relevant term in accordance with our revenue recognition policies, reduce recurring revenue from these customers. Under certain circumstances, our customers may cancel their subscriptions for our solutions prior to the expiration of the term. Our future success also depends, in part, on our ability to sell new products and services to our existing customers. If our customers terminate their agreements, fail to renew their agreements, renew their agreements upon less favorable terms, or fail to buy new products and services from us, our revenue may decline or our future revenue may be constrained.

 

17


Table of Contents

In addition, Vurv has historically offered perpetual licenses and customer on-premise hosting for certain of its products, while we have historically maintained a single version of each release of our software applications that is configurable to meet the needs of our customers without customer-specific code customizations. If we are unable to convert such Vurv customers to our Taleo hosted, subscription model, our future revenues may be adversely impacted.

If our efforts to attract new customers are not successful, our revenue growth will be adversely affected.

In order to grow our business, we must continually add new customers. Our ability to attract new customers will depend in large part on the success of our sales and marketing efforts. However, our prospective customers may not be familiar with our solutions, or may have traditionally used other products and services for their talent management requirements. In addition, our prospective customers may develop their own solutions to address their talent management requirements, purchase competitive product offerings, or engage third-party providers of outsourced talent management services that do not use our solution to provide their services. If our prospective customers do not perceive our products and services to be of sufficiently high value and quality, we may not be able to attract new customers.

In addition, certain of our prospective customers may delay or discontinue sales cycles as a result of the current negative general economic conditions or downturns in their businesses.

Some prospective customers may request that we license our software to them on a perpetual basis, which may, after we have ratably recognized the revenue for the perpetual license over the relevant term in accordance with our revenue recognition policies, reduce recurring revenue from these customers. To date, we have completed a limited number of agreements with such terms.

If we do not compete effectively with companies offering talent management solutions, our revenue may not grow and could decline.

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, intense competition from a number of companies. Our Taleo Enterprise Edition solution competes with vendors of enterprise resource planning software such as Oracle Corporation and SAP AG, and also with vendors such as ADP, Authoria, Cezane, Cornerstone OnDemand, Halogen Software, HRSmart, Jobpartners, Kenexa, Kronos, Peopleclick, Pilat, Plateau, Salary.com, Stepstone, SuccessFactors, Technomedia, TEDS, Workday, and Workstream, that offer products and services that compete with one or more modules in our Taleo Enterprise Edition suite of solutions. Our Taleo Business Edition solution competes primarily with Bullhorn, Hiredesk, iCIMs, Openhire, Monster.com, and Virtual Edge from ADP. Our competitors may announce new products, services or enhancements that better meet changing industry standards or the price or performance needs of customers. Increased competition may cause pricing pressure and loss of market share, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Certain of our competitors and potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, development, marketing, sales, service and other resources than we have. Some of these companies also have a larger installed base of customers, longer operating histories and greater brand recognition than we have. Certain of our competitors provide products that may incorporate capabilities which are not available in our current suite of solutions, such as automated payroll and benefits, or services that we do not currently offer, such as recruitment process outsourcing services. Products with such additional functionalities may be appealing to some customers because they can reduce the number of different types of software or applications used to run their business and such additional services may be viewed by some customers as enhancing the effectiveness of a competitor’s solutions. In addition, our competitors’ products may be more effective than our products at performing particular talent management functions or may be more customized for particular customer needs in a given market. Further, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to changes in customer requirements.

Our customers often require our products to be integrated with software provided by our existing or potential competitors. These competitors could alter their products in ways that inhibit integration with our products, or they could deny or delay access by us to advance software releases, which would restrict our ability to adapt our products to facilitate integration with these new releases and could result in lost sales opportunities. In addition, many organizations have developed or may develop internal solutions to address talent management requirements that may be competitive with our solutions.

Our stock price is likely to be volatile and could decline.

The stock market in general and the market for technology-related stocks in particular has been highly volatile. As a result, the market price of our Class A common stock is likely to be similarly volatile, and investors in our Class A common stock may experience a decrease in the value of their stock, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. The price of our Class A common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including those listed in this “Risk Factors” section and others such as:

 

   

our operating performance and the performance of other similar companies;

 

18


Table of Contents
   

overall performance of the equity markets;

 

   

developments with respect to intellectual property rights;

 

   

publication of unfavorable research reports about us or our industry or withdrawal of research;

 

   

coverage by securities analysts or lack of coverage by securities analysts;

 

   

speculation in the press or investment community;

 

   

general economic conditions and data and the impact of such conditions and data on the equity markets;

 

   

terrorist acts; and

 

   

announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new technologies, acquisitions, commercial relationships, joint ventures, or capital commitments.

The consolidation of our competitors or other similar strategic alliances could weaken our competitive position or reduce our revenue.

There has been vendor consolidation in the market in which we operate over the past few years. For example, Kronos acquired Unicru in 2006 and recently acquired Deploy Solutions. Kronos itself was acquired in 2007 by the private equity firm Hellman & Friedman. Kenexa acquired Brassring in 2006 and ADP acquired VirtualEdge in 2006. In 2008, we acquired Vurv Technology, Inc. These transactions, or additional consolidation within our industry may change in the competitive landscape in ways that adversely affect our ability to compete effectively.

Our competitors may also establish or strengthen cooperative relationships with our current or future BPO partners, HRO partners, systems integrators, third-party consulting firms or other parties with whom we have relationships, thereby limiting our ability to promote our products and limiting the number of consultants available to implement our solutions. Disruptions in our business caused by these events could reduce our revenue.

The results of our review of our revenue recognition practices and resulting restatement may continue to have adverse effects on our financial results.

Our review of our revenue recognition practices and the resulting restatement of our historical financial statements have required us to expend significant management time and incur significant accounting, legal, and other expenses. The accounting, legal and other expenses associated with the restatement have had a material adverse effect on our results of operations. As a result of our revenue recognition review and the resulting restatement, revenue from consulting services totaling approximately $18 million reported in our previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003 through 2007, and our interim consolidated financial statements for each of the periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, will be deferred to periods after June 30, 2008. Additionally, the correction relating to the timing of revenue recognition for set-up fees, an element of application services revenue, will result in the deferral of approximately $0.2 million in application revenue recognized as of June 30, 2008 to periods after June 30, 2008. See the “Explanatory Note Regarding Restatement” immediately preceding Part I, Item 1 and Note 2 “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for further discussion. In addition, litigation has been filed against us, our current officers and certain of our former officers relating to a failure to apply GAAP in the reporting of quarterly and annual financial statements and securities prospectuses from the time of our initial public offering to our most recent filing with the SEC. See Part I, Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” for a more detailed description of these proceedings. We may become the subject of additional private or government actions regarding these matters in the future. These proceedings are in the preliminary stages, and their ultimate outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and the trading price for our securities. Litigation may be time-consuming, expensive and disruptive to normal business operations, and the outcome of litigation is difficult to predict. The defense of this litigation will result in significant expenditures and the continued diversion of our management’s time and attention from the operation of our business, which could impede our business. While we maintain standard directors and officers insurance, all or a portion of any amount we may be required to pay to satisfy a judgment or settlement of any or all of these claims may not be covered by insurance.

 

19


Table of Contents

We have had to restate our historical financial statements.

In March 2009, we announced that we had completed a review of our revenue recognition practices and, as a result of this review, would restate certain financial statements and defer to future periods $18 million of consulting services revenue previously recognized through June 30, 2008. Amounts in our previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003 through 2007, and the interim consolidated financial statements for each of the periods ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, have been corrected for the timing of revenue recognition for consulting services revenue during these periods, as well as to correct an error relating to consulting services revenue recognition and the timing of revenue recognition for set-up fees, an element of our application services revenue. In connection with such review we identified certain control deficiencies relating to the application of applicable accounting literature related to revenue recognition. These deficiencies constituted a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2008, which led to corrections in our historical financial statements and our conclusion to restate such financial statements to correct those items. Specifically, the control deficiencies related to our failure to correctly interpret Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Element Deliverables (“EITF 00-21”), in determining the proper accounting treatment when application and consulting services are sold together.

In connection with the December 31, 2005 year-end audit of our financial statements, management and with our independent registered public accounting firm identified deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that were deemed to be material weaknesses. In particular, we discovered errors in respect to depreciation of fixed assets, and accrual of dividends on preferred stock which required adjustment. As a result, we restated our consolidated financial statements. We also identified a failure to appropriately apply GAAP to certain aspects of our financial reporting resulting from the lack of a properly designed financial reporting process and a lack of sufficient technical accounting expertise. Certain of such deficiencies were also deemed to be material weaknesses, which we remediated as of December 31, 2005.

We cannot be certain that the measures we have taken since these restatements will ensure that restatements will not occur in the future. Execution of restatements like the ones described above could create a significant strain on our internal resources and cause delays in our filing of quarterly or annual financial results, increase our costs and cause management distraction.

Failure to implement and maintain the appropriate internal controls over financial reporting could negatively affect our ability to provide accurate and timely financial information.

During 2006 we completed a review and redesign of our internal controls over financial reporting related to our closing procedures and processes, our calculations of our reported numbers, including depreciation expense and fixed assets, and the need to strengthen our technical accounting expertise. Despite these efforts, we identified a material weakness in connection with the evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls as of March 31, 2007 prior to the filing of our financial results for the period ended March 31, 2007, related to the identification of a material adjustment required, which affected cash, accounts receivable and cash flow from operations. Additionally in third quarter of 2008, we identified certain control deficiencies relating to the application of applicable accounting literature related to revenue recognition. These deficiencies constituted a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2008. As part of our ongoing processes we will continue to focus on improvements in our controls over financial reporting. We have discussed deficiencies in our financial reporting and remediation of such deficiencies with the audit committee of our board of directors and will continue to do so as required. However, we cannot be certain that we will be able to remediate all deficiencies in the future. Any current or future deficiencies could materially and adversely affect our ability to provide timely and accurate financial information.

We have not been in compliance with SEC reporting requirements and NASDAQ listing requirements. If we are unable to attain compliance with, or thereafter remain in compliance with SEC reporting requirements and NASDAQ listing requirements, there may be a material adverse effect on our business and our stockholders.

As a consequence of our review of our revenue recognition practices and resulting restatement of our historical financial statements, we were unable to file our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 with the SEC on a timely basis and continue to face the possibility of delisting of our stock from the NASDAQ Global Market. We have now filed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008. Until we have returned to full compliance with SEC reporting requirements and NASDAQ listing requirements, the possibility of a NASDAQ delisting exists. If this happens, the price of our stock and the ability of our stockholders to trade in our stock would be adversely affected. In addition, we would be subject to a number of restrictions regarding the registration of our stock under federal securities laws, and we would not be able to allow our employees to exercise their outstanding options, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Furthermore, if we are delisted in the future from the NASDAQ Global Market, there may be other negative implications, including the potential loss of confidence by customers, suppliers and employees and the loss of institutional investor interest in our company.

As a result of the delayed filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as well as our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, we will be ineligible to register our securities on Form S-3

 

20


Table of Contents

for sale by us or resale by others until one year from the date the last delinquent filing is made. We may use Form S-1 to raise capital or complete acquisitions, but doing so could increase transaction costs and adversely impact our ability to raise capital or complete acquisitions of other companies in a timely manner.

Our financial performance may be difficult to forecast as a result of our historical focus on large customers and the long sales cycle associated with our solutions.

The majority of our revenue is currently derived from organizations with complex talent management requirements. Accordingly, in a particular quarter the majority of our bookings from new customers on an aggregate contract value basis are from large sales made to a relatively small number of customers. As such, our failure to close a sale in a particular quarter will impede desired revenue growth unless and until the sale closes. In addition, sales cycles for our Taleo Enterprise Edition clients are generally between three months and one year, and in some cases can be longer. As a result, substantial time and cost may be spent attempting to secure a sale that may not be successful. The period between our first sales call on a prospective customer and a contract signing is relatively long due to several factors such as:

 

   

the complex nature of our solutions;

 

   

the need to educate potential customers about the uses and benefits of our solutions;

 

   

the relatively long duration of our contracts;

 

   

the discretionary nature of our customers’ purchase and budget cycles;

 

   

the competitive evaluation of our solutions;

 

   

fluctuations in the staffing management requirements of our prospective customers;

 

   

announcements or planned introductions of new products by us or our competitors; and

 

   

the lengthy purchasing approval processes of our prospective customers.

If our sales cycles unexpectedly lengthen, our ability to forecast accurately the timing of sales in any given period will be adversely affected and we may not meet our forecasts for that period.

If we fail to develop or acquire new products or enhance our existing products to meet the needs of our existing and future customers, our sales will decline.

To keep pace with technological developments, satisfy increasingly sophisticated customer requirements, and achieve market acceptance, we must enhance and improve existing products and continue to introduce new products and services. For instance, in February 2009 our performance management software product became generally available in the market. Any new products we develop or acquire may not be introduced in a timely manner and may not achieve the broad market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenue. If we are unable to develop or acquire new products that appeal to our target customer base or enhance our existing products or if we fail to price our products to meet market demand or if the products we develop or acquire do not meet performance expectations or have a higher than expected cost structure to host and maintain, our business and operating results will be adversely affected. Our efforts to expand our solutions beyond our current offerings or beyond the talent management market may divert management resources from existing operations and require us to commit significant financial resources to an unproven business, which may harm our existing business.

We expect to incur additional expense to develop software products and to integrate acquired software products into existing platforms to maintain our competitive position. For example, our acquisition of Vurv will require significant effort to maintain existing Vurv products in addition to ours and to integrate the products of both companies over time. In addition, we have invested in software development locations other than the locations where we traditionally developed our software. For example, we have

 

21


Table of Contents

invested in development locations in Eastern Europe, Ukraine and Asia, and we may invest in other locations outside of North America in the future. In addition, we plan to continue to invest in Jacksonville, Florida, the former headquarters site of Vurv, as a software development location. We may engage independent contractors for all or portions of this work. These efforts may not result in commercially viable solutions, may be more expensive or less productive than we anticipate, or may be difficult to manage and result in distraction to our management team. If we do not manage these remote development centers effectively or receive significant revenue from our product development investments, our business will be adversely affected.

Additionally, we intend to maintain a single version of each release of our software applications that is configurable to meet the needs of our customers. Customers may require customized solutions or features and functions that we do not yet offer and do not intend to offer in future releases, which may disrupt out ability to maintain a single version of our software releases or cause our customers to choose a competing solution. Vurv has historically allowed customer specific customizations of its software and we may find it difficult to support or migrate such customizations.

Acquisitions and investments present many risks, and we may not realize the anticipated financial and strategic goals for any such transactions, which would harm our business, operating results and overall financial condition. In addition, we have limited experience in acquiring and integrating other companies.

We have made, and may continue to make, acquisitions or investments in companies, products, services, and technologies to expand our product offerings, customer base and business. For example, in 2008, we completed our acquisition of Vurv, which is our largest acquisition to date, and made an equity investment in Worldwide Compensation, Inc., our first such investment. We have limited experience in executing acquisitions and investments. Acquisitions and investments involve a number of risks, including the following:

 

   

being unable to achieve the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions;

 

   

discovering that we may have difficulty integrating the accounting systems, operations, and personnel of the acquired business, and may have difficulty retaining the key personnel of the acquired business;

 

   

our ongoing business and management’s attention may be disrupted or diverted by transition or integration issues and the complexity of managing geographically and culturally diverse locations;

 

   

difficulty incorporating the acquired technologies or products into our existing code base;

 

   

problems arising from differences in the revenue, licensing or support model of the acquired business;

 

   

customer confusion regarding the positioning of acquired technologies or products;

 

   

difficulty maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies across locations;

 

   

difficulty retaining the acquired business’ customers; and

 

   

problems or liabilities associated with product quality, technology and legal contingencies.

The consideration paid in connection with an investment or acquisition also affects our financial results. If we should proceed with one or more significant acquisitions in which the consideration includes cash, we could be required to use a substantial portion of our available cash to consummate any such acquisition. To the extent that we issue shares of stock or other rights to purchase stock, existing stockholders may be diluted and earnings per share may decrease. For example, in connection with our acquisition of Vurv, we paid approximately $34.4 million in cash, approximately 3.8 million shares of Class A common stock, and repaid approximately $9.0 million of Vurv’s debt. We also assumed obligations for options to purchase shares of Vurv common stock, which were converted into options to purchase approximately 0.4 million of our Class A common stock. In addition, acquisitions may result in the incurrence of debt, material one-time write-offs, or purchase accounting adjustments and restructuring charges. They may also result in recording goodwill and other intangible assets in our financial statements which may be subject to future impairment charges or ongoing amortization costs, thereby reducing future earnings. In addition, from time to time, we may enter into negotiations for acquisitions or investments that are not ultimately consummated. Such negotiations could result in significant diversion of management time, as well as incurring expenses that may impact operating results.

We have discontinued the time and expense processing services of our Taleo Contingent solution. We may have difficulty replacing the revenue from these customers.

Effective March 2007, we ceased entering into agreements to provide time and expense processing services for temporary workers. Fees for time and expense processing through our Taleo Contingent product declined throughout 2007; however, on an

 

22


Table of Contents

annualized basis such fees were still significant in 2007. Revenue from time and expense processing effectively ended on August 30, 2008. We may find it difficult to replace the revenue we once received from the processing of temporary worker time and expense transactions and our results may be negatively impacted.

We may lose sales opportunities if we do not successfully develop and maintain strategic relationships to sell and deliver our solutions.

We have partnered with a number of business process outsourcing, or BPO, and human resource outsourcing, or HRO, providers that resell our staffing solutions as a component of their outsourced human resource services and we intended to partner with more in the future. If customers or potential customers begin to outsource their talent management functions to BPOs or HROs that do not resell our solutions, or to BPOs or HROs that choose to develop their own solutions, our business will be harmed. In addition, we have relationships with third-party consulting firms, system integrators and software and service vendors who provide us with customer referrals, integrate their complementary products with ours, cooperate with us in marketing our products and provide our customers with system implementation or other consulting services. If we fail to establish new strategic relationships or expand our existing relationships, or should any of these partners fail to work effectively with us or go out of business, our ability to sell our products into new markets and to increase our penetration into existing markets may be impaired.

If we are required to reduce our prices to compete successfully, our margins and operating results could be adversely affected.

The intensely competitive market in which we do business may require us to reduce our prices. If our competitors offer discounts on certain products or services we may be required to lower prices or offer our solutions on less favorable terms to compete successfully. Some of our larger competitors have significantly greater resources than we have and are better able to absorb short-term losses. Any such changes would likely reduce our margins and could adversely affect our operating results. Some of our competitors may provide bundled product offerings that compete with ours for promotional purposes or as a long-term pricing strategy. These practices could, over time, limit the prices that we can charge for our products or services. If we cannot offset price reductions with a corresponding increase in the quantity of applications sold, our margins and operating results would be adversely affected.

If our security measures are breached and unauthorized access is obtained to customer data, customers may curtail or stop their use of our solutions, which would harm our reputation, operating results, and financial condition.

Our solutions involve the storage and transmission of customers’ proprietary information, and security breaches could expose us to loss of this information, litigation and possible liability. While we have security measures in place, if our security measures are breached as a result of third-party action, employee error, criminal acts by an employee, malfeasance, or otherwise, and, as a result, someone obtains unauthorized access to customer data, our reputation will be damaged, our business may suffer and we could incur significant liability. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target. As a result, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Unless our customers elect to purchase encryption, we do not encrypt data we store for our customers while such data is at rest in the database. Applicable law may require that a security breach involving certain types of unencrypted data be publicly disclosed. If an actual or perceived breach of our security occurs, the market perception of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose sales and customers. Our insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur due to failures in our security measures.

Defects or errors in our products could affect our reputation, result in significant costs to us and impair our ability to sell our products, which would harm our business.

Our products may contain defects or errors, which could materially and adversely affect our reputation, result in significant costs to us and impair our ability to sell our products in the future. The costs incurred in correcting any product defects or errors may be substantial and could adversely affect our operating results. While we test our products for defects or errors prior to product release, defects or errors have been identified from time to time by our customers and may continue to be identified in the future.

Any defects that cause interruptions in the availability or functionality of our solutions could result in:

 

   

lost or delayed market acceptance and sales of our products;

 

   

loss of customers;

 

   

product liability and breach of warranty suits against us;

 

23


Table of Contents
   

diversion of development and support resources;

 

   

injury to our reputation; and

 

   

Increased maintenance and warranty costs.

While our software subscription agreements typically contain limitations and disclaimers that should limit our liability for damages related to defects in our software, such limitations and disclaimers may not be upheld by a court or other tribunal or otherwise protect us from such claims.

If we fail to manage our hosting infrastructure capacity satisfactorily, our existing customers may experience service outages and our new customers may experience delays in the deployment of our solution.

We have experienced significant growth in the number of users, transactions, and data that our hosting infrastructure supports. Failure to address the increasing demands on our hosting infrastructure satisfactorily may result in service outages, delays or disruptions. For example, we have experienced downtimes within our hosting infrastructure, some of which have been significant, which have prevented customers from using our solutions from time to time. We seek to maintain sufficient excess capacity in our hosting infrastructure to meet the needs of all of our customers. We also maintain excess capacity to facilitate the rapid provisioning of new customer deployments and expansion of existing customer deployments. The development of new hosting infrastructure to keep pace with expanding storage and processing requirements could be a significant cost to us that we are not able to predict accurately and for which we are not able to budget significantly in advance. Such outlays could raise our cost of goods sold and be detrimental to our financial results. At the same time, the development of new hosting infrastructure requires significant lead time. If we do not accurately predict our infrastructure capacity requirements, our existing customers may experience service outages that may subject us to financial penalties, financial liabilities and the loss of customers. If our hosting infrastructure capacity fails to keep pace with sales, customers may experience delays as we seek to obtain additional capacity, which could harm our reputation and adversely affect our revenue growth. Integrating the hosting infrastructure of Vurv and other acquired entities may increase these challenges.

In addition, we recently brought to market a performance management product for which we may not be able to accurately predict the number of users, transactions and infrastructure demands. Such a failure could result in system outages for our customers and higher than expected costs to support and maintain our performance management solution, which could negatively affect our reputation and our financial results.

Any significant disruption in our computing and communications infrastructure could harm our reputation, result in a loss of customers and adversely affect our business.

Our computing and communications infrastructure is a critical part of our business operations. Our customers access our solutions through a standard web browser. Our customers depend on us for fast and reliable access to our applications. Much of our software is proprietary, and we rely on the expertise of members of our engineering and software development teams for the continued performance of our applications. We have experienced, and may in the future experience, serious disruptions in our computing and communications infrastructure. Factors that may cause such disruptions include:

 

   

human error;

 

   

physical or electronic security breaches;

 

   

telecommunications outages from third-party providers;

 

   

computer viruses;

 

   

acts of terrorism or sabotage;

 

24


Table of Contents
   

fire, earthquake, flood and other natural disasters; and

 

   

power loss.

Although we back up data stored on our systems at least weekly, our infrastructure does not currently include real-time, or near real-time, mirroring of data storage and production capacity in more than one geographically distinct location. Thus, in the event of a physical disaster, or certain other failures of our computing infrastructure, customer data from recent transactions may be permanently lost.

We currently deliver our solutions from nine data centers that host the applications for all of our customers. The Taleo Enterprise platform is hosted from three facilities: a U.S. facility leased from Equinix, Inc. in San Jose, California, a U.S. facility leased from Internap Network Services Corporation in New York City, New York and a Netherlands data center facility also leased from Equinix in Amsterdam. Internet bandwidth and access is provided by Internap in the two U.S. facilities and by Equinix in the Netherlands. The Taleo Business Edition is hosted through two U.S. facilities: a facility located in San Jose, California and operated via a managed services arrangement and a facility located in San Francisco, California to host the legacy Vurv product for small-and medium-sized organizations. Opsource, Inc. provides hardware, internet bandwidth, and access in the San Jose, California hosting facility through the managed services arrangement. The Vurv legacy enterprise recruiting product is hosted through four facilities: a facility located in Jacksonville, Florida in the U.S., a facility located in Atlanta, Georgia in the U.S., a facility located in London, England and a facility located in Sydney, Australia. Internet bandwidth and access for the Vurv legacy enterprise recruiting product is provided by Peak 10 in the USA Florida facility, Adapt PLC in the England facility, and Conexim Australia Pty Ltd in the Australia facility. We do not control the operation of these facilities and must rely on these vendors to provide the physical security, facilities management and communications infrastructure services to ensure the reliable and consistent delivery of our solutions to our customers. In the case of Opsource and Vurv locations that are managed service locations, we also rely upon the third party vendor for hardware associated with our hosting infrastructure. Although we believe we would be able to enter into a similar relationship with another third party should one of these relationships fail or terminate for any reason, we believe our reliance on any third-party vendor exposes us to risks outside of our control. If these third-party vendors encounter financial difficulty such as bankruptcy or other event beyond our control that cause them to fail to secure adequately and maintain their hosting facilities or provide the required data communications capacity, our customers may experience interruptions in our service or the loss or theft of important customer data. In the future, we may elect to open computing and communications hardware operations at additional third-party facilities located in the United States, Europe or other regions. We are not experienced at operating such facilities in jurisdictions outside the United States and doing so may pose additional risk to us.

We have experienced system failures in the past. If our customers experience service interruptions or the loss or theft of their data caused by us, we may be required to issue credits pursuant to the terms of our contracts and may also be subject to financial liability or customer losses. Such credits could reduce our revenues below the levels that we have indicated we expect to achieve and adversely affect our margins and operating results.

Our insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur due to any failures or interruptions in our systems.

We must hire and retain key employees and recruit qualified personnel or our future success and business could be harmed.

Our success depends on the continued employment of our senior management and other key employees, such as our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer. If we lose the services of one or more of our senior management or key employees, or if one or more of them decides to join a competitor or otherwise to compete with us, our business could be harmed. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any of our executive officers. Additionally, our continued success depends, in part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified technical, sales and other personnel. It may be particularly challenging to retain employees as we integrate new acquisitions, like our recent acquisition of Vurv, due to uncertainty among employees regarding their career options and cultural differences between us and Vurv.

We currently derive a significant portion of our revenue from international operations and expect to expand our international operations. However, we do not have substantial experience in international markets, and may not achieve the expected results.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, application revenue generated outside of the United States was 17% of total revenue, based on the location of the legal entity of the customer with which we contracted, of which 5% was revenue generated in Canada. Our primary research and development operation is in Quebec, Canada, but we conduct research and development in other international locations as well. We currently have international offices outside of North America in Australia, France, the Netherlands,

 

25


Table of Contents

Singapore and the United Kingdom, which focus primarily on selling and implementing our solutions in those regions. In the future, we may expand to other international locations. Our current international operations and future initiatives will involve a variety of risks, including:

 

   

unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, taxes, trade laws, tariffs, export quotas, custom duties or other trade restrictions;

 

   

differing regulations in Quebec with regard to maintaining operations, products and public information in both French and English;

 

   

differing labor regulations, especially in the European Union and Quebec, where labor laws are generally more advantageous to employees as compared to the United States, including deemed hourly wage and overtime regulations in these locations;

 

   

more stringent regulations relating to data privacy and the unauthorized use of, or access to, commercial and personal information, particularly in Europe and Canada;

 

   

reluctance to allow personally identifiable data related to non-U.S. citizens to be stored in databases within the United States, due to concerns over the United States government’s right to access personally identifiable data of non-U.S. citizens stored in databases within the United States or other concerns;

 

   

greater difficulty in supporting and localizing our products;

 

   

greater difficulty in localizing our marketing materials and legal agreements, including translations of these materials into local language;

 

   

changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions;

 

   

challenges inherent in efficiently managing an increased number of employees or independent contractors over large geographic distances, including the need to implement appropriate systems, policies, benefits and compliance programs;

 

   

limited or unfavorable intellectual property protection; and

 

   

restrictions on repatriation of earnings.

If we invest substantial time and resources to expand our international operations and are unable to do so successfully and in a timely manner, our business and operating results will suffer.

Fluctuations in the exchange rate of foreign currencies could result in currency transaction losses, which could harm our operating results and financial condition.

We currently have foreign sales denominated in foreign currencies, including the Australian dollar, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, the euro, New Zealand dollar, Singapore dollar and Swiss franc and may in the future have sales denominated in the currencies of additional countries in which we establish or have established sales offices. In addition, we incur a substantial portion of our operating expenses in Canadian dollars and, to a much lesser extent, other foreign currencies. Any fluctuation in the exchange rate of these foreign currencies may negatively affect our business, financial condition and operating results. For instance, in 2008, the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates compared to the average rates in effect during 2007 was a $0.8 million decrease in earnings. In 2009, we expect that the volatility in exchange rates for foreign currencies may continue and, as a result, we may continue to see fluctuations in our revenue and expenses, which may impact our operating results. We have not previously engaged in foreign currency hedging. If we decide to hedge our foreign currency exposure, we may not be able to hedge effectively due to lack of experience, unreasonable costs or illiquid markets.

 

26


Table of Contents

If we fail to defend our proprietary rights aggressively, our competitive advantage could be impaired and we may lose valuable assets, experience reduced revenue, and incur costly litigation fees to protect our rights.

Our success is dependent, in part, upon protecting our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade secret laws, and contractual restrictions to establish and protect our proprietary rights in our products and services. We do not have any issued patents and only one pending patent. We do not rely on patent protection. We will not be able to protect our intellectual property if we are unable to enforce our rights or if we do not detect unauthorized use of our intellectual property. Despite our precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy our products and use information that we regard as proprietary to create products and services that compete with ours. Some license provisions protecting against unauthorized use, copying, transfer and disclosure of our licensed products may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions and foreign countries in which we operate. Further, the laws of some countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. To the extent we expand our international activities, our exposure to unauthorized copying and use of our products and proprietary information may increase. We enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and consultants and enter into confidentiality agreements with the parties with whom we have strategic relationships and business alliances. No assurance can be given that these agreements will be effective in controlling access to and distribution of our products and proprietary information. Further, these agreements do not prevent our competitors from developing technologies independently that are substantially equivalent or superior to our products. Initiating legal action may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights and to protect our trade secrets. Litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management resources, either of which could seriously harm our business.

Current and future litigation against us could be costly and time consuming to defend.

We are sometimes subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the course of business. For example, we are currently defendants in a suit alleging patent infringement and a suit alleging securities fraud, both of which are described in more detail in Part I, Item 3 “Legal Proceedings” and Note 11, “Commitments and Contingencies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. Litigation may result in substantial costs and may divert management’s attention and resources, which may seriously harm our business, overall financial condition, and operating results. In addition, legal claims that have not yet been asserted against us may be asserted in the future. See Note 11 “Commitments and Contingencies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for further information regarding pending and threatened litigation and potential claims.

Our results of operations may be adversely affected if we are subject to a protracted infringement claim or a claim that results in a significant award for damages.

Software product developers such as us may continue to receive infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our space grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. For example, Kenexa, a competitor, filed suit against us for patent infringement in August 2007 and other infringement claims have been threatened against us. We can give no assurance that such claims will not be filed in the future. Our competitors or other third parties may also challenge the validity or scope of our intellectual property rights. A claim may also be made relating to technology that we acquire or license from third parties. If we were subject to a claim of infringement, regardless of the merit of the claim or our defenses, the claim could:

 

   

require costly litigation to resolve and the payment of substantial damages;

 

   

require significant management time;

 

   

cause us to enter into unfavorable royalty or license agreements;

 

   

require us to discontinue the sale of our products;

 

   

require us to indemnify our customers or third-party service providers; or

 

   

require us to expend additional development resources to redesign our products.

We entered into standard indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business and may be required to indemnify our customers for our own products and third-party products that are incorporated into our products and that infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Although many of the third parties from which we purchase are obligated to indemnify us if their products infringe the rights of others, this indemnification may not be adequate.

 

27


Table of Contents

In addition, from time to time there have been claims challenging the ownership of open source software against companies that incorporate open source software into their products. We use open source software in our products and may use more open source software in the future. As a result, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software. Litigation could be costly for us to defend, have a negative effect on our operating results and financial condition or require us to devote additional research and development resources to change our products.

Our insurance policies will not compensate us for any losses or liabilities resulting from patent infringement claims.

We employ technology licensed from third parties for use in or with our solutions, and the loss or inability to maintain these licenses or errors in the software we license could result in increased costs, or reduced service levels, which would adversely affect our business.

Our hosted solutions incorporate certain technology obtained under licenses from other companies, such as Oracle for database software. We anticipate that we will continue to license technology and development tools from third parties in the future. Although we believe that there are commercially reasonable software alternatives to the third-party software we currently license, this may not always be the case, or we may license third-party software that is more difficult or costly to replace than the third party software we currently license. In addition, integration of our products with new third-party software may require significant work and require substantial allocation of our time and resources. Also, to the extent that our products depend upon the successful operation of third-party products in conjunction with our products, any undetected errors in these third-party products could prevent the implementation or impair the functionality of our products, delay new product introductions and injure our reputation. Our use of additional or alternative third-party software would require us to enter into license agreements with third parties, which could result in higher costs.

Difficulties that we may encounter in managing changes in the size of our business could affect our operating results adversely.

In order to manage our business effectively, we must continually manage headcount in an efficient manner. In the past, we have undergone facilities consolidations and headcount reductions in certain locations and departments. As a result, we have incurred, and may incur, charges for employee severance. We may experience additional facilities consolidations and headcount reductions in the future. As many employees are located in jurisdictions outside of the United States, we are required to pay the severance amounts legally required in such jurisdictions, which may exceed those of the United States. Further, we believe reductions in our workforce and facility consolidation create anxiety and uncertainty, and may adversely affect employee morale. These measures could adversely affect our employees that we wish to retain and may also adversely affect our ability to hire new personnel. They may also negatively affect customers.

Failure to manage our customer deployments effectively could increase our expenses and cause customer dissatisfaction.

Enterprise deployments of our products require a substantial understanding of our customers’ businesses, and the resulting configuration of our solutions to their business processes and integration with their existing systems. We may encounter difficulties in managing the timeliness of these deployments and the allocation of personnel and resources by us or our customers. In certain situations, we also work with third-party service providers in the implementation or software integration-related services of our solutions, and we may experience difficulties in managing such third parties. Failure to manage customer implementation or software integration-related services successfully by us or our third-party service providers could harm our reputation and cause us to lose existing customers, face potential customer disputes or limit the rate at which new customers purchase our solutions.

Our reported financial results may be adversely affected by changes in generally accepted accounting principles or changes in our operating history that impact the application of generally accepted accounting principles.

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, are subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, or AICPA, The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCOAB, the SEC and various other organizations formed to promulgate and interpret accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our projected financial results.

Pursuant to the application of GAAP we recognize the majority of our application revenue monthly over the life of the application agreement. In certain instances, the straight-line revenue recognized on a monthly basis may exceed the amounts invoiced for the same period. If our history of collecting all fees reflected in our application agreements negatively changes, the application of GAAP may mandate that we not recognize revenue in excess of the fees invoiced over the corresponding period for new agreements. The application of GAAP also requires that we accomplish delivery of our solutions to our customers in order to recognize revenue associated with such solutions. In the context of our model, delivery generally requires the creation of an instance of the solution that may be accessed by the customer via the Internet. We may experience difficulty in making new products available to our customers in this manner. In the event we are not able to make our solutions available to our customer via the Internet in a timely manner, due to resource constraints, implementation difficulties or other reasons, our ability to recognize revenue from the sales of our solutions may be delayed and our financial results may be negatively impacted.

 

28


Table of Contents

The application of GAAP to our operations may also require significant judgment and interpretation as to the appropriate treatment of a specific issue. These judgments and interpretations are complicated by the relative newness of the on-demand, vendor hosted software business model, also called software-as-a-service or SaaS, and the relative lack of interpretive guidance with respect to the application of GAAP to the SaaS model. For example, in connection with our recent review of our revenue recognition practices, we submitted a pre-clearance submission to the Office of the Chief Accountant of the SEC, or OCA, requesting its view of our historical application of EITF 00-21. Following consultation with the OCA, we changed our application of EITF 00-21. See Explanatory Note Regarding Restatement immediately preceding Part 1, Item 1. We cannot ensure that our interpretations and judgments with respect to the application of GAAP will be correct in the future and any incorrect interpretations and judgments could adversely affect our business.

If tax benefits currently available under the tax laws of Canada and the province of Quebec are reduced or repealed, or if we have taken an incorrect position with respect to tax matters under discussion with the Canadian Revenue Agency or other taxing authorities, our business could suffer.

The majority of our research and development activities are conducted through our Canadian subsidiary, Taleo (Canada) Inc. We participate in a government program in Quebec that provides investment credits based upon qualifying research and development expenditures. These expenditures primarily consist of the salaries for the persons conducting research and development activities. We have participated in the program since 1999, and expect that we will continue to receive these investment tax credits through December 2010. In 2008, we recorded a CAD $2.7 million reduction in our research and development expenses as a result of this program. We anticipate the continued reduction of our research and development expenses through application of these credits through 2010. If these investment tax benefits are reduced or eliminated, our financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.

In addition to the research and development investment credit program described above, our Canadian subsidiary is participating in a scientific research and experimental development, or SRED, program administered by the Canadian federal government that provides income tax credits based upon qualifying research and development expenditures. For tax year 2007, we recorded a SRED credit claims of approximately CAD $1.1 million and have estimated our 2008 SRED credit claim to approximate CAD $1.2 million. Our Canadian subsidiary is eligible to remain in the SRED program for future tax years as long as its development projects continue to qualify. These federal SRED tax credits can only be applied to offset federal taxes payable and are reported as a credit to tax provision to the extent they reduce taxes payable to zero with any residual benefits recorded as a net deferred tax asset. We believe that our Canadian subsidiary is in compliance with these government programs and that all amounts recorded will be fully realized. If these investment credits are reduced or disallowed by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”), our financial condition and operating results may be adversely affected.

Our Canadian subsidiary has been under examination by the Canada Revenue Agency “CRA” with respect to tax years 2000 and 2001. In December 2008, we were issued a proposed notice of assessment by CRA to increase taxable income by approximately CAD $3.8 million in respect to our 2002 tax year. These adjustments relate, principally, to our treatment of CDTI tax credits and income and expense allocations recorded between the Company and our Canadian subsidiary. We disagree with CRA’s basis for their proposed 2002 adjustments and intend to appeal their decision through applicable administrative and judicial procedures. Also in December 2008, Taleo was notified by CRA of their intention to audit tax years 2003 through 2007. No proposed assessment notices have been issued with respect to these open tax years.

We have settled certain issues raised in the 2000 and 2001 audit and are appealing the CRA’s treatment of Quebec investment tax credits. Final resolution of the CRA’s examination will have bearing on the tax treatment applied in subsequent periods not currently under examination. We have recorded income tax reserves believed to be sufficient to cover the estimated tax assessments for the open tax periods.

There could be a significant impact to our uncertain tax position over the next twelve months depending on the outcome of the on-going CRA audit. In the event the CRA audit results in adjustments that exceed both our income tax reserves and available deferred tax assets, our Canadian subsidiary may become a tax paying entity in 2009 or in a prior year including potential penalties and interest. Any such penalties cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

We are seeking United States tax treaty relief through the appropriate Competent Authority tribunals for the assessments and settlements entered into with CRA and will seek treaty relief for all subsequent tax adjustments. Although we believe we have reasonable basis for our tax positions, it is possible an adverse outcome could have a material effect upon our financial condition, operating results or cash flows in a particular period or annual period.

As we continue to expand domestically and internationally, we may become subject to review by various U.S. and foreign taxing authorities which could negatively impact our financial results. While we have reserved for these uncertainties and do not expect the outcomes of these reviews to be material to our operations, our current assessment as to the potential financial impact of these reviews could prove incorrect and we may incur additional income tax expense in the period the uncertainty is resolved.

 

29


Table of Contents

Evolving regulation of the Internet may increase our expenditures related to compliance efforts, which may adversely affect our financial condition.

As Internet commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation by federal, state or foreign agencies may become more likely. We are particularly sensitive to these risks because the Internet is a critical component of our business model. For example, we believe increased regulation is likely in the area of data privacy, and laws and regulations applying to the solicitation, collection, processing or use of personal or consumer information could affect our customers’ ability to use and share data, potentially reducing demand for solutions accessed via the Internet and restricting our ability to store, process and share data with our customers via the Internet. In addition, taxation of services provided over the Internet or other charges imposed by government agencies or by private organizations for accessing the Internet may also be imposed. Any regulation imposing greater fees for internet use or restricting information exchange over the Internet could result in a decline in the use of the Internet and the viability of internet-based services, which could harm our business.

We may need to raise additional capital, which may not be available, thereby adversely affecting our ability to operate our business.

If we need to raise additional funds due to unforeseen circumstances, we cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all, and any additional financings could result in additional dilution to our existing stockholders. If we need additional capital and cannot raise it on acceptable terms, we may not be able to meet our business objectives, our stock price may fall and you may lose some or all of your investment.

Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may delay or prevent a third party from acquiring us.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could increase the difficulty for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. For example, if a potential acquirer were to make a hostile bid for us, the acquirer would not be able to call a special meeting of stockholders to remove our board of directors or act by written consent without a meeting. In addition, our board of directors has staggered terms, which means that replacing a majority of our directors would require at least two annual meetings. The acquirer would also be required to provide advance notice of its proposal to replace directors at any annual meeting, and will not be able to cumulate votes at a meeting, which will require the acquirer to hold more shares to gain representation on the board of directors than if cumulative voting were permitted.

Our board of directors also has the ability to issue preferred stock that could significantly dilute the ownership of a hostile acquirer. In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law limits business combination transactions with 15% or greater stockholders that have not been approved by the board of directors. These provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without negotiation. These provisions may apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our principal offices are in Dublin, California, where we lease approximately 35,000 square feet of space. We entered into the Dublin lease in March 2006. The term of the Dublin lease is seven (7) years, commencing on June 15, 2006, and we have one option to renew the lease for an additional term of five (5) years. Over the term, our base rent ranges from approximately $52,000 per month to approximately $85,000 per month, in addition to operating expenses and taxes.

In connection with the acquisition of Vurv, we assumed the lease of 40,000 square feet of office space in Jacksonville, Florida. This facility, which at the time of the acquisition was Vurv’s principal offices, is used for customer training and other general operations. The remaining term of the Jacksonville lease is two (2) years ending on November 1, 2010. We have two options to renew the lease for an additional term of five (5) years. Over the remaining two years, our base rent is approximately $60,000 per month, in addition to operating expenses and taxes.

Our primary research and development facility is in Quebec City, Canada, where we lease approximately 41,000 square feet of space. The Quebec lease has been in effect since December 1998 and will expire in December 2012. Our base rent is CAD$72,000 per month, in addition to operating expenses and taxes.

 

30


Table of Contents

Our former principal office in San Francisco, California, consisting of approximately 12,109 square feet, was subleased on

October 19, 2006. The term of the sublease commenced on October 31, 2006, and will end on July 30, 2009. Under the sublease, we will receive monthly rental payments of approximately $22,000 until September 30, 2008, and $24,000 from October 1, 2008 to July 30, 2009. The monthly base rent payable by the sublessee under the sublease was abated for the first two months of the term. The sublease also provides for the payment of additional rent for operating expenses and taxes.

In North America, we have additional offices for our sales and services personnel throughout the United States, including offices in Chicago, Illinois and Petaluma, California. Outside of North America, we maintain offices for our sales and services personnel in the London area, Melbourne, Paris, Singapore and Sydney.

We believe that our facilities are adequate for current needs, though we may open additional sales, services, development and support locations in 2009. We believe that suitable additional or substitute space will be available as needed to accommodate foreseeable expansion of our operations.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Kenexa Litigation

Kenexa BrassRing, Inc., (“Kenexa”) filed suit against us in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on August 27, 2007. Kenexa alleges that we infringed Patent Nos. 5,999,939 and 6,996,561, and seeks monetary damages and an order enjoining the Company from further infringement. The Company answered Kenexa’s complaint on January 28, 2008. On May 9, 2008, Kenexa filed a similar lawsuit against Vurv Technology, Inc. (“Vurv”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that Vurv has infringed Patent Nos. 5,999,939 and 6,996,561, and seeking monetary damages and an order enjoining us from further infringement. We answered Kenexa’s complaint on May 29, 2008. We acquired Vurv on July 1, 2008. Management has reviewed these matters and believes that neither our nor Vurv’s software products infringe any valid and enforceable claim of the asserted patents. We have engaged in settlement discussions with Kenexa, but no settlement agreement has been reached. Litigation is ongoing with respect to these matters.

On June 30, 2008, we filed a reexamination request with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), seeking reconsideration of the validity of Patent No. 6,996,561 based on prior art that we presented with our reexamination request. Finding that our reexamination request raised a “substantial new question of patentability,” the USPTO ordered reexamination of Patent No. 6,996,561 on September 5, 2008. On November 13, 2008, the USPTO issued an office action rejecting all of the claims of Patent No. 6,996,561 because they are either anticipated by or unpatentable over the prior art. The USPTO’s reexamination of Patent No. 6,996,561 is ongoing.

In a separate action filed on June 25, 2008 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Kenexa Technology, Inc. has asserted claims against us for tortious interference with contract, unfair competition, unfair trade practices, and unjust enrichment arising from our refusal to allow Kenexa employees to access and use our proprietary applications to provide outsourcing services to a Taleo customer, and seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief. We answered Kenexa Technology, Inc.’s complaint on July 23, 2008. On October 16, 2008, we amended our answer and filed counterclaims against Kenexa Technology, Inc., alleging copyright infringement, misappropriation of trade secrets, interference with contractual relations, and unfair competition arising from Kenexa’s unauthorized access and use of the Taleo products in the course of providing outsourcing services to the our customers, and seeking declaratory judgment, monetary damages, and injunctive relief.

Securities Claims

On November 14, 2008, following the announcement that we were re-evaluating certain of our historical and then current accounting practices, a shareholder class action lawsuit entitled Brett Johnson v. Taleo Corporation, Michael Gregoire, Katy Murray, and Divesh Sisodraker, CV-08-5182 SC, was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §10(b) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5. The Johnson lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice on December 22, 2008. On December 17, 2008, a second substantially similar shareholder lawsuit entitled Terrence Popyk v. Taleo Corporation, Michael Gregoire, Katy Murray, and Divesh Sisodraker, CV 08-5634 PH, was filed in the Northern District of California; the Popyk lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice on January 20, 2009. On January 13, 2009, a third shareholder lawsuit entitled Scott Stemper v Taleo Corporation, Michael Gregoire, Katy Murray, and Divesh Sisodraker, CV 09-0151 JSW, was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On February 9, 2009, the court renamed the Stemper action “In re Taleo Corporation Securities Litigation” and appointed the Greater Pennsylvania Carpenter’s Pension Fund as lead plaintiff. The court has scheduled a case management conference for September 11, 2009. No motions are currently pending before the court.

The operative complaint alleges that defendants engaged in securities fraud in violation of §10(b) of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5. The fraud allegations include a failure to apply GAAP in the reporting of quarterly and annual financial statements and

 

31


Table of Contents

securities prospectuses from the time of our initial public offering to the most recent filing with the SEC. The complaint seeks an unspecified amount of damages on behalf of a purported class of individuals or institutions who purchased or acquired shares of our common stock between October 4, 2005 and November 8, 2008.

Other Matters

In addition to the matters described above, we are subject to various claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business from time to time, including claims and legal proceedings that have been asserted against us by customers, former employees and advisors and competitors. We have accrued for estimated losses in the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements for matters where we believe the likelihood of an adverse outcome is probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. Based on currently available information, management does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these unresolved matters, individually or in the aggregate, are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. However litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and our views on these matters may change in the future. Were an unfavorable outcome to occur in any one or more of those matters or the matters described above, over and above the amount, if any, that has been estimated and accrued in our audited consolidated financial statements, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows in the period in which the unfavorable outcome occurs or becomes probable, and potentially in future periods.

 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our Class A common stock has been listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “TLEO” since September 29, 2005. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our Class A common stock. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices on the Nasdaq Global Market of the Class A common stock for the periods indicated.

 

     High    Low

For the year ended December 31, 2008

     

Fourth quarter

   $ 20.26    $ 5.69

Third quarter

     25.75      17.38

Second quarter

     21.66      17.28

First quarter

     29.00      16.72

For the year ended December 31, 2007

     

Fourth quarter

   $ 33.97    $ 24.07

Third quarter

     26.07      20.23

Second quarter

     22.54      15.25

First quarter

     16.82      12.06

As of March 31, 2009, there were approximately 112 holders of record of our Class A common stock. Because many of our shares of Class A common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholder, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.

 

32


Table of Contents

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities(1)

 

Period

   Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
   Price
Paid per
Share
    Total Number
of

Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly

Announced
Plans

or Programs
   Maximum
Dollar

Value of Shares
that May Yet
Be

Purchased
under

the Plans or
Programs

October 1, 2008 through October 31, 2008

   13,696    $ 20.26 (2)    —      —  

November 1, 2008 through November 30, 2008

   —        —        —      —  

December 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008

   —        —        —      —  
                      
   13,696    $ 20.26 (2)    —      —  
                      

 

(1) In connection with our awards of restricted stock and/or performance shares, we repurchase common stock from employees as consideration for the payment of required withholding taxes.
(2) Represents the weighted average price per share.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our Class A common stock. We currently expect to retain any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Class A common stock in the foreseeable future.

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph shows a comparison from September 28, 2005 through December 31, 2008 of cumulative total return for Taleo’s Class A common stock, the Nasdaq stock Market (U.S.) Index and the Nasdaq Computer and Data Processing Index. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on September 28, 2005 in Taleo’s Class A common stock and each of the indices as noted below, including reinvestment of dividends. No dividends have been paid or declared on Taleo’s Class A common stock. Note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

 

33


Table of Contents

COMPARISON OF 39 MONTH CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Taleo Corporation, The NASDA Q Composite Index

And The NASDA Q Computer & Data Processing Index

LOGO

 

 

* $100 invested on 9/28/05 in stock or 8/31/05 in index-including reinvestment of dividends.

Fiscal year ending December 31.

Information used in the graph was obtained from Research Data Group Inc, a third party investment research firm, a source believed to be reliable, but we are not responsible for any errors or omissions in such information.

The stock performance graph shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Taleo under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The consolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, have been restated as set forth in this Form 10-K/A. The information set forth below should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K/A. The information presented in the following tables has been adjusted to reflect our restatement resulting from the error in our accounting for stock-based compensation expense, as is more fully described in the “Explanatory Note Regarding Restatement” immediately preceding Part I, Item 1 and in Note 2, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. The information presented in the following tables also reflects our prior restatement resulting from our review of our revenue recognition practices also described in the “Explanatory Note Regarding Restatement” immediately preceding Part I, Item 1 and in Note 2, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. The financial information that has been previously filed or otherwise reported for these periods is superseded by the information in this Form 10-K/A, and the financial statements and related financial information contained in such previously-filed reports should no longer be relied upon.

 

34


Table of Contents
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2008 (1)     2007 (1)     2006 (1)     2005 (2)     2004 (2)  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
    As restated     As restated     As restated     As reported     Adjustments     As restated     As reported     Adjustments     As restated  

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data(3):

                 

Revenue:

                 

Application

  $ 138,628      $ 105,032      $ 79,116      $ 63,296      $ (27   $ 63,269      $ 49,010      $ —        $ 49,010   

Consulting

    29,791        23,038        15,864        15,114        (6,169     8,945        9,640        (5,122     4,518   
                                                                       

Total revenue

    168,419        128,070        94,980        78,410        (6,196     72,214        58,650        (5,122     53,528   

Cost of revenue:

                 

Application

    32,376        22,642        19,394        16,419        (8     16,411        14,627        —          14,627   

Consulting

    25,269        18,098        12,857        11,058        —          11,058        8,276        —          8,276   
                                                                       

Total cost of revenue

    57,645        40,740        32,251        27,477        (8     27,469        22,903        —          22,903   
                                                                       

Gross profit

    110,774        87,330        62,729        50,933        (6,188     44,745        35,747        (5,122     30,625   

Operating expenses:

                 

Sales and marketing

    53,827        37,172        29,841        22,544        (63     22,481        18,153        —          18,153   

Research and development

    30,994        23,197        19,722        16,687        (37     16,650        15,932        —          15,932   

General and administrative

    32,382        24,281        21,619        10,725        104        10,829        7,096        62        7,158   

Restructuring and severance expense

    1,914        —          414        804        —          804        —          —          —     
                                                                       

Total operating expenses

    119,117        84,650        71,596        50,760        4        50,764        41,181        62        41,243   
                                                                       

Operating income (loss)

    (8,343     2,680        (8,867     173        (6,192     (6,019     (5,434     (5,184     (10,618

Other income (expense):

                 

Interest income

    1,717        3,045        2,891        873        —          873        101        —          101   

Interest expense

    (199     (137     (107     (1,273     —          (1,273     (404     —          (404

Fees for early extinguishment of debt

    —          —          —          (2,264     —          (2,264     —          —          —     
                                                                       

Total other income (expense), net

    1,518        2,908        2,784        (2,664     —          (2,664     (303     —          (303

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes

    (6,825     5,588        (6,083     (2,491     (6,192     (8,683     (5,737     (5,184     (10,921

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

    1,303        3,083        (323     4        —          4        (11     —          (11
                                                                       

Net income (loss)

    (8,128     2,505        (5,760     (2,495     (6,192     (8,687     (5,726     (5,184     (10,910

Accrual of dividends and issuance costs on preferred stock

    —          —          —          (2,984     —          (2,984     (3,299     —          (3,299
                                                                       

Net income (loss) attributable to Class A common stockholders

  $ (8,128   $ 2,505      $ (5,760   $ (5,479   $ (6,192   $ (11,671   $ (9,025   $ (5,184   $ (14,209
                                                                       

Net income (loss) attributable to Class A common stockholders per share — basic

  $ (0.29   $ 0.10      $ (0.29   $ (1.19   $ (1.34   $ (2.53   $ (161.16   $ (92.57   $ (253.73

Net income (loss) loss attributable to Class A common stockholders per share — diluted

  $ (0.29   $ 0.09      $ (0.29   $ (1.19   $ (1.34   $ (2.53   $ (161.16   $ (92.57   $ (253.73

Weighted-average Class A common shares — basic

    27,569        24,116        20,031        4,619        4,619        4,619        56        56        56   

Weighted-average Class A common shares — diluted(4)

    27,569        28,777        20,031        4,619        4,619        4,619        56        56        56   
    As of December 31,  
    2008     2007 (1)     2006 (2)     2005 (2)     2004 (2)  
    (In thousands)  
          As restated     As restated     As reported     Adjustments     As restated     As reported     Adjustments     As restated  

Consolidated balance sheet data:

                 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 49,462      $ 86,135      $ 58,785      $ 59,346      $ 12      $ 59,358      $ 5,773      $ 21      $ 5,794   

Working capital (deficit)

    19,594        60,515        49,310        58,497        (7,295     51,202        (1,371     (3,611     (4,982

Total assets

    283,189        164,821        118,571        99,020        (12     99,008        38,648        27        38,675   

Long-term debt(5)

    519        16        17        399        21        420        2,573        —          2,573   

Total preferred stock and exchangeable share obligation

    —          331        796        1,715        —          1,715        52,073        —          52,073   

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

    172,421        85,668        61,155        71,698        (14,348     57,350        (42,996     (8,139     (51,135

 

(1) See Note 2 “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of these corrections.
(2) The consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 have been revised to reflect adjustments related to the restatements described below under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Restatement” and Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(3) We acquired Recruitforce.com, Inc. in March 2005, certain assets of JobFlash, Inc. in March 2007, certain assets of Wetfeet, Inc. in July 2007, and Vurv Technology, Inc. in July 2008. Our consolidated statement of operations and balance sheet data include the results of Recruitforce.com, JobFlash, Wetfeet and Vurv Technology only for periods subsequent to October 21, 2003, March 10, 2005, March 7, 2007, July 3, 2007, and July 1, 2008, respectively. See Item 7, “ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 3 “Business Combinations and Dispositions” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our acquisitions with respect to JobFlash, Inc., Wetfeet, Inc., and Vurv Technology, Inc.
(4) Exchangeable shares, redeemable convertible preferred stock, stock options, and warrants are not included if antidilutive for the periods presented. See Note 8 “Preferred Stock” and Note 9 “Common Stock” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(5) Includes long-term debt and capital leases related to production equipment and internal use software. See Note 11 “Commitments and Contingencies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

35


Table of Contents
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Restatement

With this annual report on Form 10-K/A, we have restated the following previously filed consolidated financial statements, data and related disclosures:

 

  (1) Our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K/A;

 

  (2) Our selected financial data as of and for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 in Part II, Item 6 of this Form 10-K/A;

 

  (3) Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations as of and for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 in Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K/A; and

 

  (4) Our unaudited quarterly financial information for each quarter in our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 in Note 16, “Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K/A.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations incorporates the restated amounts. For this reason, the data set forth in this section may not be comparable to discussions and data in our previously filed Annual Reports. The restatement results from our review of revenue recognition practices and errors identified in the calculation of stock-based compensation. See “Explanatory Note Regarding Restatement” immediately preceding Part I, Item 1 and Note 2, “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for a detailed discussion of the review and effect of the restatement.

Overview

We are a leading provider of on-demand, talent management software solutions. We offer recruiting, performance management, internal mobility and other talent management solutions that help our customers attract and retain high quality talent, more effectively match workers’ skills to business needs, reduce the time and costs associated with manual and inconsistent processes, ease the burden of regulatory compliance, and increase workforce productivity through better alignment of workers’ goals and career plans with corporate objectives. Our performance management solution became generally available in February 2008 and accordingly did not contribute to net revenues in 2007 or prior years.

We offer two suites of talent management solutions: Taleo Enterprise Edition and Taleo Business Edition. Taleo Enterprise Edition is designed for larger, more complex organizations. Taleo Business Edition is designed for smaller, less complex organizations, stand-alone departments and divisions of larger organizations, and staffing companies. Our revenue is primarily earned through subscription fees charged for accessing and using these solutions. Our customers generally pay us in advance for their use of our solutions, and we use these cash receipts to fund our operations. Our customers generally pay us on a quarterly or annual basis.

We focus our evaluation of our operating results and financial condition on certain key metrics, as well as certain non-financial aspects of our business. Included in our evaluation are our revenue composition and growth, net income, and our overall liquidity that is primarily comprised of our cash and accounts receivable balances. Non-financial data is also evaluated, including, for example, purchasing trends for software applications across industries and geographies, input from current and prospective customers relating to product functionality and general economic data relating to employment and workforce trends. We use this aggregated information to assess our historic performance, and also to plan our future strategy.

On May 5, 2008, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Reorganization Agreement”) to purchase Vurv Technology, Inc. (“Vurv”), a privately held company. Vurv is a provider of on demand talent management software. On July 1, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Vurv. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operating results of Vurv are reflected in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. The total consideration paid by us in connection with the acquisition was approximately $34.4 million in cash and approximately 3.8 million shares of Class A common stock, of which approximately $33.8 million in cash and approximately 3.3 million shares of Class A common stock were paid on the closing date. Approximately 0.5 million shares were placed into escrow for one year following the closing to be held as security for losses incurred by us in the

 

36


Table of Contents

event of certain breaches of the representations and warranties contained in the Reorganization Agreement or certain other events. Additionally, approximately $0.3 million was placed into escrow to pay for expenses incurred by the stockholder representative in connection with its duties under the Reorganization Agreement, and approximately $0.4 million was placed in escrow to compensate us in the event certain expenses are incurred in connection with payments to certain Vurv employees. In addition, we assumed outstanding options to purchase shares of Vurv common stock, which converted into options to purchase approximately 0.4 million shares of our Class A common stock. We also repaid approximately $9.0 million of Vurv debt on the closing date. No contingent cash payments remain for this transaction.

In September 2008, we made an equity investment in Worldwide Compensation, Inc. (“WWC”), a privately held company that provides compensation, recruiting and performance solutions. We invested $2.5 million for a 16% equity investment and an option to purchase WWC. The purchase option is exercisable from June 4, 2009 through December 2, 2009. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18 (APB 18), “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock” we recorded the investment at cost at $1.4 million. The fair value of the purchase option was recorded in the balance sheet as other assets on the date of issuance at $1.1 million. The estimated fair value of the purchase option on the date of issuance was determined based on the Black-Scholes model.

In November 2008, we entered in an agreement to sell our Optimize product offering (“Optimize”) and the associated assets and liabilities. We acquired Optimize in connection with the acquisition of Vurv an July 1, 2008 and the sale of Optimize represents the completion of a disposition plan initiated during the third quarter of 2008. The sale of Optimize did not result in a significant gain or loss.

Sources of Revenue

We derive our revenue from two sources: application revenue and consulting revenue.

Application Revenue

Application revenue is generally comprised of subscription fees from customers accessing our applications, which includes the use of the application, application and data hosting, and maintenance of the application. The majority of our application subscription revenue is recognized monthly over the life of the application agreement, based on a stated, fixed-dollar amount. Revenue associated with our Taleo Contingent solution was recognized based on a fixed contract percentage of the dollar amount invoiced for contingent labor through use of the application. Effective March 2007, we ceased entering into agreements to provide time and expense processing as a component of our Taleo Contingent solution and, accordingly, our revenue model based on a percentage of spend from such processing services ended. We serviced our customers to which we provide such time and expense processing services through the expiration of their agreements with us. Revenue from time and expense processing for these customers ended in August 2008.

The term of our application agreements for Taleo Enterprise Edition signed with new customers in 2008, 2007, and 2006 is typically three or more years. The term of application agreements for Taleo Business Edition is typically one year. Our customer renewals on a dollar basis have historically been greater than 95%.

Application agreements entered into during 2008, 2007, and 2006 are generally non-cancelable, or contain significant penalties for early cancellation, although customers typically have the right to terminate their contracts for cause, if we fail to perform our material obligations.

Consulting Revenue

Consulting revenue consists primarily of fees associated with application configuration, integration, business process re-engineering, change management, and education and training services. From time to time, certain of our consulting projects are subcontracted to third parties. Our customers may also elect to use unrelated third parties for the types of consulting services that we offer. Our typical consulting contract provides for payment within 30 to 60 days of invoice.

Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses

Cost of Revenue

Cost of application revenue primarily consists of expenses related to hosting our application and providing support, including employee related costs and depreciation expense associated with computer equipment and the amortization of intangible assets acquired in connection with Vurv. We allocate overhead such as rent and occupancy charges, employee benefit costs and depreciation expense to all departments based on employee count. As such, overhead expenses are reflected in each cost of revenue and operating expense category. We currently deliver our solutions from nine data centers that host the applications for all of our customers.

Cost of consulting revenue consists primarily of employee related costs associated with these services and allocated overhead.

 

37


Table of Contents

The cost associated with providing consulting services is significantly higher as a percentage of revenue than for our application revenue, primarily due to labor costs. We also subcontract to third parties for a portion of our consulting business. To the extent that our customer base grows, we intend to continue to invest additional resources in our consulting services. The timing of these additional expenses could affect our cost of revenue, both in dollar amount and as a percentage of revenue, in a particular quarterly or annual period.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for our sales and marketing staff, including commissions, marketing programs, allocated overhead and amortization of intangibles from acqusitions. Marketing programs include advertising, events, corporate communications, and other brand building and product marketing expenses. As our business grows, we plan to continue to increase our investment in sales and marketing by adding personnel, building our relationships with partners, expanding our domestic and international selling and marketing activities, building brand awareness, and sponsoring additional marketing events. We expect that our sales and marketing expenses will increase in dollar terms as a result of these investments, however the overall sales and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue is expected to stay consistent.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses and allocated overhead, and third-party consulting fees. Our expenses are net of the tax credits we receive from the Canada Revenue Agency, Revenue Quebec and Investment Quebec. We focus our research and development efforts on increasing the functionality and enhancing the ease of use and quality of our applications, as well as developing new products and enhancing our infrastructure. We expect that the amount of research and development expenses will increase in dollar terms, but expect that the overall expense will decrease as a percentage of revenue.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist of salaries and related expenses for executive, finance and accounting, human resource, legal, operations and management information systems personnel, professional fees, board compensation and expenses, expenses related to potential mergers and acquisitions, and other corporate expenses. We expect that the amount of general and administrative expenses will slightly increase in dollar terms as we add personnel over the next year, however as a percentage of revenue are expected to stay consistent or decrease.

Employee Benefits

Effective January 1, 2008, we instituted a 401(k) matching program with the following specifics: (i) for employee contributions to our 401(k) plan of up to 4% of the each employee’s base salary up to a maximum of $230,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. We will match such employee contributions at a rate of $0.50 for every $1.00 contributed by the employee; and (ii) our 401(k) matching program has a three year vesting period with one third of the employer contribution match vesting each year over the three year period. We recorded $0.4 million in employee related costs during the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 as a result of the adoption of this program.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. In many instances, we could have reasonably used different accounting estimates, and in other instances changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected.

In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management’s judgment in its application, while in other cases, management’s judgment is required in selecting among available alternative accounting standards that allow different accounting treatment for similar transactions. We believe that the accounting policies discussed below are critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these policies relate to the more significant areas involving management’s judgments and estimates. Our management has reviewed these critical accounting policies, our use of estimates and the related disclosures with our audit committee.

 

38


Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

We derive revenue from fixed subscription fees for access to and use of our on-demand application services, and from consulting fees.

In addition to fixed subscription fees arrangements, on limited occasions, we have entered into arrangements including a perpetual license with hosting services to be provided over a fixed term. For hosted arrangements, revenues are recognized under the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force or EITF No. 00-3, Application of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to Arrangements That Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another Entity’s Hardware.

Our application and consulting fee revenue is recognized when all of the following conditions have been satisfied:

 

   

persuasive evidence of an agreement exists;

 

   

delivery has occurred;

 

   

fees are fixed or determinable; and

 

   

the collection of fees is considered probable.

If collection is not considered probable, we recognize revenues when the fees for the services performed are collected. In addition, if non-standard acceptance periods or non-standard performance criteria are required, we recognize revenue upon the satisfaction of the acceptance or performance criteria, as applicable.

We utilize the provisions of EITF No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables”, to determine whether our arrangements containing multiple deliverables contain more than one unit of accounting. Multiple element arrangements require the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. To qualify as a separate unit of accounting, the delivered item must have value to the customer on a standalone basis and there must be objective and reliable evidence of fair value of any undelivered element. Our consulting services have standalone value because those services are sold separately by other vendors and we have objective and reliable evidence of fair value for consulting services based on the consistency when sold separately. Our application services have standalone value because we often sell such services separately; however, in multiple element arrangements that include both application and consulting services, we typically do not have objective and reliable evidence of fair value for our application services. As such, we treat multiple element arrangements that include both application and consulting services as a single unit of accounting and recognize the combined revenue over the subscription term.

The Company’s objective and reliable evidence of fair value for consulting services and its assessment of fair value with respect to application services are used to derive a reasonable approximation for presenting application services and consulting services separately in its consolidated financial statements.

Application Revenue

The majority of our application revenue is recognized monthly over the life of the application agreement, based on stated, fixed-dollar amount contracts with our customers and consists of:

 

   

fees paid for subscription services;

 

   

amortization of any related set-up fees; and

 

   

amortization of fees paid for hosting services and software maintenance services under certain software license arrangements.

Set up fees paid by customers in connection with subscription services are deferred and recognized ratably over the longer of the life of the application agreement or the expected lives of customer relationships, which generally range from three to seven years. We continue to evaluate the length of the amortization period of the set up fees as we gain more experience with customer contract renewals.

Our revenue associated with the time and expense processing functionality of our Taleo Contingent solution is recognized based on a fixed, contracted percentage of the dollar amount invoiced for contingent labor through use of the application, and is recorded on a net basis under the provisions of EITF No. 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent, as we are not the primary obligor under the arrangements, the percentage earned by us is typically fixed, and we do not take credit risk.

 

39


Table of Contents

Consulting Revenue

Consulting revenue consists primarily of fees associated with application configuration, integration, business process re-engineering, change management, and education and training services. In arrangements that include both an application subscription and consulting services, the related consulting revenues are recognized ratably over the remaining subscription term. Our consulting engagements are typically billed on a time and materials basis and, for engagements sold separately from application services, we recognize consulting revenues as delivered. In some instances we sell consulting services on a fixed-fee basis and, in those cases, for engagements sold separately from application services, we recognize consulting revenues using a proportional performance model based on services performed. Associated out-of-pocket travel and expenses related to the delivery of consulting services is typically reimbursed by the customer. This is accounted for as both revenue and expense in the period the cost is incurred. From time to time, certain of our consulting projects are subcontracted to third parties. Our customers may also elect to use unrelated third parties for the types of consulting services that we offer. Our typical consulting contract provides for payment within 30 to 60 days of invoice.

Research and Development

We account for software development costs under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS), No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed. Accordingly, we capitalize certain software development costs after technological feasibility of the product has been established. Such costs have been immaterial to date, and accordingly, no costs were capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Stock-based Compensation

We adopted SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006. Under the provisions of SFAS 123(R), we recognize the fair value of stock-based compensation in financial statements over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals a four year vesting period. We have elected the modified prospective transition method for adopting SFAS 123(R), under which the provisions of SFAS 123(R) apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of adoption. The unrecognized expense of awards not yet vested at the date of adoption is recognized in our financial statements in the periods after the date of adoption using the same value determined under the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as disclosed in previous filings. We recognize compensation expense for the stock option awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, see Note 1 “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Stock-Based Compensation” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimates are used in determining the fair value of such awards. Changes in these estimates could result in changes to our compensation charges.

Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we conduct a test for the impairment of goodwill on at least an annual basis. We adopted October 1 as the date of the annual impairment test. The impairment test first compares the fair value of reporting units to their carrying amount, including goodwill, to assess whether impairment is present. Based on our most recent assessment test, the fair value of the reporting units exceeds our carrying value and therefore we do not have impairment as of October 1, 2008. We will assess the impairment of goodwill annually on October 1, or sooner if indicators of impairment arise.

SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, requires the review of the carrying value of long-lived assets when impairment indicators arise. The review of these long-lived assets is based on factors including estimates of the future operating cash flows of our business. These future estimates are based on historical results, adjusted to reflect our best estimates of future market and operating conditions, and are continuously reviewed. Actual results may vary materially from our estimates, and accordingly may cause a full impairment of our long-lived assets.

Income Taxes

We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and foreign jurisdictions and we use estimates in determining our provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets, related valuation allowances and deferred tax liabilities are determined separately by tax jurisdiction. This process involves estimating actual current tax liabilities together with assessing temporary differences of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities which are recorded on the balance sheet. Our deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss carry forwards and temporary differences related to deferred revenue and stock-based compensation. We assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and a valuation allowance is recorded if it is deemed more likely than not some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In 2006, we reversed our Canadian subsidiary’s valuation allowances by approximately $1.3 million since it was determined more likely than not these deferred tax assets would be realized. At December 31, 2007, we reversed valuation allowances in our remaining

 

40


Table of Contents

foreign subsidiaries which resulted in a tax provision benefit of approximately $0.3 million. We continue to maintain a full valuation allowance against our U. S. deferred tax assets with the exception of federal alternative minimum tax credits. Although we believe that our tax estimates are reasonable, the ultimate tax determination involves significant judgment that could become subject to audit by tax authorities in the ordinary course of business.

Compliance with income tax regulations requires us to make decisions relating to the transfer pricing of revenue and expenses between each of our legal entities that are located in several countries. Our determinations include many decisions based on our knowledge of the underlying assets of the business, the legal ownership of these assets, and the ultimate transactions conducted with customers and other third-parties. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in multiple tax jurisdictions. We are periodically reviewed by domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, we record estimated reserves for exposures that are more likely than not to be realized. Such estimates are subject to change.

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth certain consolidated statements of operations data expressed as a percentage of total revenue for the periods indicated. Period-to-period comparisons of our financial results are not necessarily meaningful and you should not rely on them as an indication of future performance.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2008     2007     2006  

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

      

Revenue:

      

Application

   82   82   83

Consulting

   18   18   17
                  

Total revenue

   100   100   100

Cost of revenue (as a percent of related revenue):

      

Application

   23   22   25

Consulting

   85   79   81
                  

Total cost of revenue

   34   32   34
                  

Gross profit

   66   68   66

Operating expenses:

      

Sales and marketing

   32   29   31

Research and development

   18   18   21

General and administrative

   19   19   23

Restructuring

   1   0   0
                  

Total operating expenses

   71   66   75
                  

Operating income / (loss)

   -5   2   -9

Other income (expense):

      

Interest income

   1   2   3

Interest expense

   0   0   0
                  

Total other income, net

   1   2   3
                  

Income / (loss) before provision for income taxes

   -4   4   -6

Provision for income taxes

   1   2   0
                  

Net income / (loss)

   -5   2   -6
                  

 

41


Table of Contents

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Dollar amounts in tables are shown in thousands.

Revenue

 

     Year ended December 31,    $ change    % change  
     2008    2007      
     (In thousands)            

Application revenue

   $ 138,628    $ 105,032    $ 33,596    32

Consulting revenue

     29,791      23,038      6,753    29
                       

Total revenue

   $ 168,419    $ 128,070    $ 40,349    32
                       

The increase in application revenue was due to increased renewals by existing customers, sales to new customers, sales of additional applications to existing customers, broader roll out of our applications by existing customers and the addition of customers through our acquisition of Vurv Technology, Inc. on July 1, 2008. In 2008, we had 86 new Taleo Enterprise Edition customers and 777 new Taleo Business Edition customers. Application revenue associated with our product lines for Taleo Enterprise Edition customers increased by $16.1 million as compared to 2007. In addition we recognized approximately $12.0 million in revenue related to product lines we acquired from Vurv Technology, Inc. on July 1, 2008. Application revenue associated with Taleo Business Edition customers increased by $5.5 million as compared to 2007. The prices of our applications were relatively consistent on a period-to-period comparative basis. Application revenues will continue to increase if we continue to increase our sales of new and existing applications into our installed customer base as well as to new customers. However if we were to see a decline in sales as a result of the economic environment, revenues would eventually decline.

The increase in consulting revenue was attributable to higher demand for services from new and existing customers and a one time increase of $3.3 million in consulting revenue related to legacy Vurv engagements which were completed by December 31, 2008. Our consulting utilization rate increased to 66% in 2008 from 64% in the prior year. The utilization rate for our consultants is the percentage of time billable out of a 2,080 hour year. The prices of our consulting services were relatively consistent on a period-to-period comparative basis. We expect that consulting revenues would continue to increase as long as sales to new and existing customers continue to grow. However, consulting revenue may be subject to increased volatility as a result of the global economic uncertainty and the impact on new and existing customer budgets for consulting services.

Our U.S. company is the contracting party for all sales agreements in the United States and our Canadian subsidiary is the contracting party for all Taleo Enterprise Edition sales agreements in Canada. Prior to January 1, 2005, certain of our subsidiaries outside of North America were the contracting parties for sales transactions within their regions. After January 1, 2005, our U.S. company has been the contracting party for all new sales agreements and renewals of existing sales agreements entered into with customers outside of North America. While Vurv generally contracted with customers outside of the U.S. via a local subsidiary, renewals of such existing agreements going forward will be with a U.S. entity. Accordingly, as our customers renew their agreements with us over time, the percentage of total revenue identified to our subsidiaries outside of North America should decline. Accordingly, the geographic mix of total revenue, based on the country of location of the Taleo contracting entity, in the year ended December 31, 2008 was about 95%, less than 5% and less than 1% in the United States, Canada and the rest of the world, respectively, as compared to about 94%, 5% and 1%, respectively, in the year ended December 31, 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2006, it was 91% from the United States, 6% from Canada, 2% from Europe, and 1% from the rest of the world. We also track the geographic mix of our revenue on the basis of the location of the contracting entity for our customers. The geographic mix of application services revenue based on the region of location of the customer contracting in the year ended December 31, 2008 was 83% from the United States, 5% from Canada, 8% from Europe, and 4% from the rest of the world. For the year ended December 31, 2007 it was 85% from the United States, 6% from Canada, 6% from Europe, and 3% from the rest of the world. For the year ended December 31, 2006 it was 87% from the United States, 6% from Canada, 4% from Europe, and 3% from the rest of the world. Due to the nature of consulting services revenue recognition, it is impracticable to determine revenue by location of the customer contracting, however the trends for contracted consulting services would be expected to be similar to the geographic mix of application services.

 

42


Table of Contents

Cost of Revenue

 

     Year ended December 31,            
     2008    2007    $ change    % change  
     (In thousands)            

Cost of revenue — application

   $ 32,376    $ 22,642    $ 9,734    43

Cost of revenue — consulting

     25,269      18,098      7,171    40
                       

Cost of revenue — total

   $ 57,645    $ 40,740    $ 16,905    41
                       

During the year ended December 31, 2008, cost of application revenue increased primarily as a result of a $4.6 million increase in hosting facilities cost, a $2.8 million increase in employee-related cost (including $0.2 million in stock based compensation expense), a $1.6 million increase in depreciation and amortization, and a $0.7 million net increase in overhead allocations and other operating expenses.

The increase in cost of application revenue was primarily driven by a net headcount increase of 58 persons as compared to the prior year (including the addition of 48 employees from Vurv), additional costs related to hosting legacy Vurv applications (including third party software costs, internet bandwidth costs, and other costs associated with legacy Vurv hosting facilities) and a significant increase in amortization expense of $1.4 million due to the amortization of intangible assets acquired in connection with Vurv. Additionally, third party software costs related to the legacy Taleo applications increased due to infrastructure enhancements and an increase in capacity. Further, general operating expenses also increased as a result of our expanded operations. In 2009, we expect cost of application revenue in dollar terms to increase as revenue increases but we expect cost of application revenue as a percentage of application revenue to remain flat unless economic conditions require us to transact at prices lower than have historically been the case.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, cost of consulting revenue increased primarily as a result of a $5.0 million increase in employee-related costs (including $0.4 million in stock based compensation expense), a $1.3 million increase in professional services, a $0.6 million increase in travel expenses and a $0.3 million net increase in overhead allocations and other operating expenses.

The increase in cost of consulting revenue resulted from an increase in headcount by 42 persons as compared to the prior year (including the addition of 35 former Vurv employees which was reduced to 32 persons at December 31, 2008). Additionally, professional services expenses increased as a result of our subcontracting more of our of consulting services to third parties than we did in the prior year. The increase in overhead allocation expenses resulted from general expense increases of our expanded operations. In 2009, we expect the cost of consulting revenue to decrease in dollar terms and as a percentage of consulting revenue.

Gross Profit and Gross Profit Percentage

 

     Year ended December 31,              
     2008     2007     $ change     % change  
     (In thousands)              

Gross profit

        

Gross profit — application

   $ 106,252      $ 82,390      $ 23,862      29

Gross profit — consulting

     4,522        4,940        (418   -8
                          

Gross profit — total

   $ 110,774      $ 87,330      $ 23,444      27
                          
     Year ended December 31,              
     2008     2007     % change        

Gross profit percentage

        

Gross profit percentage — application

     77     78     -1  

Gross profit percentage — consulting

     15     21     -6  
                          

Gross profit percentage — total

     66     68     -2  
                          

The decrease in gross profit percentage on application revenue was driven predominantly by higher application expenses incurred as a result of the Vurv acquisition on July 1, 2008, including amortization of intangible expense of $1.4 million. Vurv’s gross profit percentage on application revenue was lower than Taleo on a stand-alone basis and as a result, it negatively impacted the consolidated gross profit percentage on application revenue during the second half of 2008. We expect gross profit percentage on application revenue to remain constant in 2009.

Gross profit percentage on consulting decreased in 2008 due to the combination of the growth in our consulting business and the timing of recognition of expenses as incurred while a significant percentage of consulting services revenue is recognized over the term of the application services agreement which is typically three years. This resulted in deferred consulting revenue at December 31, 2008 of $25.8 million compared to $20.9 million at December 31, 2007. Additionally, the acquisition of Vurv had minimal impact on

 

43


Table of Contents

the gross profit percentage as the gross profit percentage on engagements assumed was consistent with the net increase in consulting expenses relating to Taleo engagements. While we expect consulting revenue in terms of dollars to increase, we expect a lower gross profit percentage on consulting revenue as a result of resources needed to deliver the additional consulting revenue, and that a portion of the incremental consulting revenue will be recognized ratably over the term of the application agreement.

We expect the total gross profit percentage to be constant in 2009, however there will be continued focus on eliminating any duplicate costs resulting from the Vurv acquisition and if we are successful total gross profit percentage will improve.

Operating expenses

     Year ended December 31,            
     2008    2007    $ change    % change  
     (In thousands)            

Sales and marketing

   $ 53,827      37,172    $ 16,655    45

Research and development

     30,994      23,197      7,797    34

General and administrative

     32,382      24,281      8,101    33

Restructuring and severance expense

     1,914      —        1,914    *   
                       

Total operating expenses

   $ 119,117    $ 84,650    $ 34,467   
                       

 

* not meaningful

Sales and Marketing. During the year ended December 31, 2008, sales and marketing expenses increased by 45% over the prior year as a result of a $8.1 million increase in employee-related cost (including $1.1 million in stock based compensation expense), a $4.2 million increase in depreciation and amortization, a $2.2 million increase in marketing expenses, a $1.1 million increase in travel expenses, and a $1.1 million net increase in overhead allocations and other operating expenses.

The increase in sales and marketing expense was primarily driven by a net headcount increase of 39 persons as compared to the prior year (including the addition of 29 employees from Vurv); higher commission payments associated with our increase in new customer arrangements; amortization expenses of $4.1 million attributable to the amortization of intangible assets obtained as a result of the acquisition of Vurv on July 1, 2008; travel expenses associated with an increase in headcount, and marketing expenditures related to tradeshows, demand generation efforts for our Taleo Business Edition products. In 2009, we expect sales and marketing expense to increase in dollar terms as we continue to grow our business; and remain consistent as a percentage of revenue.

Research and Development. During the year ended December 31, 2008, research and development expenses increased by 34% over the year as a result of a $4.9 million increase in employee-related cost, a $1.7 million increase in outsourced product development and software support cost, a $0.4 million increase in travel expenses, $0.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization and a $0.4 million net increase in other operating expenses.

The increase in research and development expense was primarily driven by a net headcount increase of 67 persons as compared to the prior year (including the addition of 34 employees from Vurv). We outsourced development and quality assurance activity performed outside North America on projects such as our next Recruiting release, Taleo Performance, and the current version of Taleo Recruiting. Travel and entertainment expenses also increased as a result of the increase in headcount and travel requirements outside North America. In 2009, we expect our research and development expenses will increase in dollar terms, but will decrease as a percentage of revenue.

General and Administrative. During the year ended December 31, 2008, general and administrative expenses increased by 33% over the prior year as a result of a $4.4 million increase in employee-related cost (including $1.7 million in stock based compensation expense), a $2.3 million increase in legal fees, a $0.4 million increase in foreign exchange losses, a $0.3 million increase in audit fees, a $0.3 million increase in bad debt expense, a $0.3 million increase in travel expenses, and a $0.1 million net increase in other operational expenses.

The increase in general and administrative expense in 2008 was primarily driven by a net headcount increase of 23 persons (including the addition of 17 employees from Vurv). Employee-related cost relating to stock based compensation increased due to 2008 equity compensation grants to senior management. Our legal expenses increased significantly in 2008 due to a litigation accrual for a pending matter. And additionally, our on-going litigation costs increased and we incurred legal fees in relation to our investment in Worldwide Compensation, Inc. General and administrative expenses also increased due to telecommunication, facility and travel expenses associated with the acquisition and integration of Vurv. In 2009, we expect general and administrative expenses to increase in terms of dollars and to continue to decrease as a percentage of revenue.

Restructuring charges. In the second quarter of 2008, we initiated a restructuring plan to reorganize the company. The reorganization plan resulted in the termination of 34 employees during the year ended December 31, 2008 at a total cost of approximately $1.8 million. Additionally, we incurred $0.1 million in facility closure cost associated with this plan. We do not expect to incur any additional severance or facility cost under this plan.

 

44


Table of Contents

Contribution Margin — Operating Segments

 

     Year ended December 31,             
     2008    2007    $ change     % change  
     (In thousands)             

Contribution Margin

          

Contribution margin — application

   $ 75,258    $ 59,193    $ 16,065      27

Contribution margin — consulting

     4,522      4,940      (418   -8
                            

Contribution margin — total

   $ 79,780    $ 64,133    $ 15,647      24
                            

Application contribution margin increased 27% year over year. This was due to a 32% increase in application revenue over the same period. Consulting contribution margin decreased by 8% year over year as a result of expenses incurred to deliver services in advance of the revenue recognition for a significant percentage of our consulting services.

Interest income and interest expense

 

     Year ended December 31,              
     2008     2007     $ change     % change  
     (In thousands)              

Interest income

   $ 1,717      $ 3,045      $ (1,328   -44

Interest expense

     (199     (137     (62   45
                          

Total other income, net

   $ 1,518      $ 2,908      $ (1,390   -48
                          

Interest Income. The decrease in interest income is primarily attributable to a lower cash balance due to a $49.7 million cash outlay for the acquisition of Vurv in July of 2008. Additionally, we experienced a decline in the average rate earned on our cash balance from 3.73% at the beginning of the year to 0.7% by the end of the year.

Interest Expense. The increase in interest expense is attributable to imputed interest related to two financing agreements for software purchases entered into in 2007 and an increase in capital lease obligations as a result of the Vurv acquisition.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

 

     Year ended December 31,             
     2008    2007    $ change     % change  
     (In thousands)             

Provision for income taxes

   $ 1,303    $ 3,083    $ (1,780   -58

We recorded an income tax provision of $1.3 million in 2008 compared to an income tax provision of $3.1 million in 2007. The provision was generated principally from our international operations, state income taxes and from the reversal of valuation allowances as we utilized operating loss carryforwards. At December 31, 2008, a valuation allowance remains only against our U.S. company’s deferred tax assets excluding alternative minimum tax credits, as we determined it was more likely than not these assets will not be realized. If, based on the operating results of 2009 and other evidence, we are to conclude the U.S. deferred tax assets will be realized in the future, we will reverse the remaining valuation allowances which would likely have a material impact on our financial results in the form of reduced tax expense or increased tax benefits in the period the reversal occurs. There can be no assurances we will reverse our remaining U.S. company’s valuation allowance in 2009.

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

Dollar amounts in tables are shown in thousands.

Revenue

 

     Year ended December 31,            
     2007    2006    $ change    % change  
     (In thousands)            

Application revenue

   $ 105,032    $ 79,116    $ 25,916    33

Consulting revenue

     23,038      15,864      7,174    45
                       

Total revenue

   $ 128,070    $ 94,980    $ 33,090    35
                       

 

45


Table of Contents

The increase in application revenue was primarily attributable to increased sales of our applications, including sales to 78 new Taleo Enterprise Edition customers, 777 new Taleo Business Edition customers (including the customers of JobFlash and Wetfeet), and sales of additional products and services to our current customers. The increase in consulting revenue was attributable to higher demand for services from new and existing customers. We expect total revenues to continue to increase as we continue to sell new and existing applications into our installed customer base as well as to new customers.

Cost of Revenue

 

     Year ended December 31,            
     2007    2006    $ change    % change  
     (In thousands)            

Cost of revenue — application

   $ 22,642    $ 19,394    $ 3,248    17

Cost of revenue — consulting

     18,098      12,857      5,241    41
                       

Cost of revenue — total

   $ 40,740    $ 32,251    $ 8,489    26
                       

The increase in cost of application revenue was primarily attributable to a $1.8 million increase in employee-related costs (including $1.1 million due to headcount increase of 12, $0.4 million in severance costs related to the discontinuation of the time and expense processing services of our Taleo Contingent solution, and $0.2 million in stock-based compensation expense), $1.2 million increase in infrastructure costs relating to hardware, software and third-party fees for our hosting facilities and $0.2 million in outside professional services.

The increase in cost of consulting revenue was primarily due to a $3.4 million increase in employee-related costs (including an increase of $0.2 million in stock-based compensation expense), and as a result of increasing headcount in 2007 by 21. In addition, there was an increase of $0.8 million in fees to third parties that we subcontracted portions of our consulting business to and $0.2 million in cross charges from other functional groups supporting consulting engagements. The remaining $0.8 million increase represented increases in general overhead and depreciation expenses relating to the increase in personnel.

Gross Profit and Gross Profit Percentage

 

     Year ended December 31,            
     2007    2006    $ change    % change  
     (In thousands)            
Gross profit            

Gross profit — application

   $ 82,390    $ 59,722    $ 22,668    38

Gross profit — consulting

     4,940      3,007      1,933    64
                       

Gross profit — total

   $ 87,330    $ 62,729    $ 24,601    39
                       

 

     Year ended December 31,        
     2007     2006     % change  
Gross profit percentage       

Gross profit percentage — application

   78   75   3

Gross profit percentage — consulting

   21   19   2
                  

Gross profit percentage — total

   68   66   2
                  

The increase in gross profit was a result of higher application and consulting revenues and specifically due to an improvement in the gross profit margin on application revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007. Gross profit on application revenue improved as a result of our ability to drive greater productivity from the headcount that supports this revenue stream. Employee-related costs for application revenue grew by 17%, whereas application revenue grew by 33%. Consulting gross profit increased as a result of timing of revenue recognition as compared to expenses incurred to deliver the services.

 

46


Table of Contents

Operating expenses

 

     Year ended December 31,             
     2007    2006    $ change     % change  
     (In thousands)             

Sales and marketing

   $ 37,172    $ 29,841    $ 7,331      25

Research and development

     23,197      19,722      3,475      18

General and administrative

     24,281      21,619      2,662      12

Restructuring and severance expense

     —        414      (414   *   
                        

Total operating expenses

   $ 84,650    $ 71,596    $ 13,055      18
                        

 

* not meaningful

Sales and Marketing. We increased sales and marketing related activities and increased headcount by 22 over the year to increase growth of our business, resulting in a $5.9 million increase in employee-related costs (including $5.2 million in salary, bonus and commission and $0.7 million in SFAS 123(R) costs). Marketing programs increased by $0.9 million due primarily to investment related to marketing our Taleo Business Edition solution. We also incurred $0.5 million in increased travel, training and overhead expenses.

Research and Development. The increase in research and development expenses consisted primarily of a $0.9 million increase in employee-related costs driven by an increase in headcount in 2007 of 10 and including $0.5 million in SFAS 123(R) costs. The increase was also driven by a $0.8 million increase in professional service expense related to the development of our Taleo Performance Management solution, a $1.1 million increases in software maintenance and depreciation, a $0.6 million increase in travel, training and overhead expenses. The increase in expenses discussed above includes the impact of the U.S. dollar weakening against the Canadian dollar.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased due to an increase in employee-related costs of $5.1 million (including $4.2 million increase in salaries, bonus and associated benefits and $0.6 million in SFAS 123(R) costs and other personnel expense of $0.1 million). Although the net increase in headcount was 1, the increase in employee-related costs reflects the move of the finance function from Canada to the U.S. in 2006 and 2007. Foreign currency loss was $0.5 million greater than prior year, primarily due to the devaluation of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar. Secondary offering costs accounted for a $0.6 million increase. This was offset by a decrease in temporary help costs of $1.7 million, due to the elimination of consulting support for compliance with the Sarbanes Oxley Act and SEC reporting obligations, a decrease of audit fees of $0.7 million, a decrease in recruiting costs of $0.4 million, $0.3 million in bad debt reserve, $0.2 million in lower insurance and public company related costs and a decrease in travel and entertainment costs of $0.2 million.

Restructuring charges. During the year ended December 31, 2006, restructuring and other charges were $0.4 million for the exit from our San Francisco facility, see Note 16 “Severance and Exit Costs” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Contribution Margin — Operating Segments

 

     Year ended December 31,            
     2007    2006    $ change    % change  
     (In thousands)            
Contribution Margin            

Contribution margin — application

   $ 59,193    $ 40,000    $ 19,193    48

Contribution margin — consulting

     4,940      3,007      1,933    64
                           

Contribution margin — total

   $ 64,133    $ 43,007    $ 21,126    49
                           

Application contribution margin increased 48% year over year. This was due to a 33% increase in application revenue over the same period while application costs increased only by 17% and research and development expense by 18%. Efficient management of the production environment, and controlled hiring in research and development contributed towards margin improvement. Consulting contribution margin increased 64% year over year as a result of an increase in revenue recognition in 2007 resulting from an increased mix of consulting services sold separately, whereby revenue is recognized as the services are delivered, compared to 2006 where a higher percentage of consulting services were sold with application services and revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement, typically three years.

 

47


Table of Contents

Interest income and interest expense

 

     Year ended December 31,              
     2007     2006     $ change     % change  
     (In thousands)              

Interest income

   $ 3,045      $ 2,891      $ 154      5

Interest expense

     (137     (107     (30   28
                          

Total other income, net

   $ 2,908      $ 2,784      $ 124      4
                          

Interest Income. The increase in interest income is primarily attributable to a higher cash balance throughout 2007 when compared to 2006 and to the fact that each quarter we grew our overall cash balance. We experienced a decline in the average rate earned on our cash balance from 5.02% at the beginning of the year to 4.2% by the end of the year, but as a result of the cash balance increasing throughout the year, interest income increased year over year.

Interest Expense. The increase in interest expense is attributable to imputed interest related to two financing agreements for software purchases entered into in the second and fourth quarter of 2007.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

 

     Year ended December 31,           
     2007    2006     $ change    % change
     (In thousands)           

Provision / (benefit) for income taxes

   $ 3,083    $ (323   $ 3,406    *

 

* not meaningful

We recorded an income tax provision of $3.1 million in 2007 compared to an income tax benefit of $(0.3) in 2006. The tax provision was generated principally from the recording of an income tax reserve associated with our ongoing Canadian revenue audit and from the reversal of valuation allowances in connection with the utilization of net operating loss carryforwads. At December 31, 2007, a full valuation allowance remains only against our U.S. company’s deferred tax assets, as it was deemed more likely than not these assets will not be realized.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have funded our operations primarily through cash flows from operations and the 2005 initial public offering of our common stock. As of December 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $49.5 million, net accounts receivable of $49.2 million, and investment credits receivable of $6.1 million. In addition, we have $1.0 million in restricted cash for security deposits on our property leases.

 

     Year ended December 31,              
     2008     2007     $ change     % change  
     (In thousands)              

Cash provided by operating activities

   $ 17,754      $ 30,190      $ (12,436   -41

Cash used in investing activities

     (62,843     (13,789     (49,054   356

Cash provided by financing activities

     8,499        10,063        (1,564   -16

 

     Year ended December 31,              
     2007     2006     $ change     % change  
     (In thousands)              

Cash provided by operating activities

   $ 30,190      $ 9,362      $ 20,828      222

Cash used in investing activities

     (13,789     (12,014     (1,775   15

Cash provided by financing activities

     10,063        2,230        7,833      351

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities of $17.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2008, compares to net cash provided by operating activities of $30.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2007.

A significant item impacting our net cash provided by operating activities is accounts receivable, net of allowances, which increased by $11.4 million in 2008. Our accounts receivable balance fluctuates from period to period, depending on the timing of sales and billing activity, cash collections, and changes to our allowance for doubtful accounts. In July 2008, we acquired Vurv and our

 

48


Table of Contents

accounts receivable and deferred revenue increased by $8.1 million and $7.3 million, respectively Additionally, our invoicing at the end of 2008 significantly increased over the prior year further reducing our net cash provided by operating activity. We also use days sales outstanding, or DSO, calculated on a quarterly basis, as a measurement of the quality and status of our receivables. We define DSO as (1) accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, divided by total revenue for the most recent quarter, multiplied by (2) the number of days in that quarter. DSO was 94 days at December 31, 2008 compared to 79 days at December 31, 2007. The increase in DSO results from the timing of customer invoicing. DSO was 93 days at December 31, 2006 compared to December 31, 2007. The decrease in DSO in 2007 reflects the effectiveness of the receivables management and the impact of our focused on cash collection.

Another significant item affecting our net cash provided by operating activities is our deferred revenue. We normally record deferred revenue in connection with the invoicing related to the sale of our applications. However, in 2008 we recorded $7.3 million in deferred revenue from the acquisition of Vurv. In addition to the acquisition of Vurv and consulting services when sold with applications, our total deferred revenue increased in 2008 by $5.9 million as a result of an increase in invoicing at the end of the 2008 compared to 2007 and customers paying cash prior to receiving services. Deferred revenue increased by $5.9 million in 2007 compared to 2006 for the same reason.

In addition, our stock-based compensation expense was $11.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $8.0 million stock-based compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2007 and $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. We expect an increase in stock-based compensation expense in 2009 as a result of ongoing new hire and annual performance grants.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase in expense was due to additions to fixed assets as well as an increase in intangibles due to the acquisition of Vurv in July 2008 which increased amortization expense by $5.4 million for the six month period of July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. In 2007, depreciation and amortization expense increased by $2.2 million compared to 2006. The increase was due to additions to fixed assets as well as increase in intangibles due to the acquisition of JobFlash and Wetfeet.

Cash provided by operating activities is driven by sales of our applications. The timing of our billings and collections relating to the sales of our applications and consulting services is a significant component of our cash flows from operations, as are the level of the deferred revenue on these sales. In 2008, our cash collections were very strong as they exceeded cash collections for 2007 by 32% and more specifically, our cash collections for the fourth quarter 2008 exceeded cash collections for the fourth quarter 2007 by 24%. Additionally, cash flows from operations will continue to be affected significantly by stock based compensation expense, and depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangibles.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities increased to $62.8 million in 2008 compared to $13.8 million in 2007. This increase was driven by $49.7 million in cash used in connection with the Vurv acquisition and a $2.5 million investment in Worldwide Compensation, Inc.

Net cash used in investing activities increased to $13.8 million in 2007 primarily due to capital expenditures related to our data centers, acquisitions of certain assets of JobFlash and Wetfeet and purchase of other hardware and software.

The increase to $12.0 million in net cash used for investing in 2006 was primarily due to capital expenditures related to our data center, relocation of our corporate offices and implementation of a new general accounting system.

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

In 2008, net cash provided by financing activities was $8.5 million. This $1.6 million decrease from 2007 resulted from a reduction in proceeds from stock option exercises and employees stock purchase plan contributions. Such equity activity diminished in 2008 due to 50% fewer options exercised in 2008.

In 2007, net cash provided by financing activities was $10.1 million and this is primarily the result of $11.1 million in net proceeds received from the exercise of stock options, warrants and contributions to the employee stock purchase plan, offset by $0.4 million of payments related to capital lease obligations.

In 2006, net cash provided by financing activities was $2.2 million and this is primarily the result of $3.0 million in proceeds received from the exercise of stock options, warrants and contributions to our employee stock purchase plan, offset by $0.6 million of payments related to capital lease obligations.

We had capital lease obligations of $1.6 million and $0.1 million outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 respectively. These leases to unrelated third parties are subject to interest rates ranging from 3% to 15% and mature at varying dates through 2013.

 

49


Table of Contents

We believe our existing cash and cash equivalents, and anticipated cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure needs for at least the next year. Additionally, our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of bookings and revenue growth, the expansion of our sales and marketing activities, the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts and expansion into new territories, the timing of introductions of new applications and enhancements to existing applications, and the continuing market acceptance of our applications. To the extent that existing cash and cash equivalents, and cash from operations, are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing. We may enter into potential investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary businesses, applications or technologies, in the future, which could also require us to seek additional equity or debt financing. Additional funds may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not participate in transactions that involve unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. Excluding operating leases for office space, computer equipment, software, and third party facilities that host our applications, which are described below, we do not engage in off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

We generally do not enter into long-term minimum purchase commitments. Our principal commitments, which are not included in our debt agreements discussed above, consist of obligations under leases for office space, operating leases for computer equipment and to a lesser extent, leases for third-party facilities that host our applications. The following table summarizes our commitments to settle contractual obligations in cash under operating leases and other purchase obligations, as of December 31, 2008:

Contractual obligations (in thousands)

 

     Total    Less Than
1 Year
   2—3 Years    4—5 Years
     (In thousands)

Capital lease obligations

   $ 1,620    $ 1,101    $ 473    $ 46

Interest payments

     87      64      23      —  

Facility leases (1)

     7,915      3,243      3,241      1,431

Operating equipment leases

     151      101      50      —  

Third party hosting facilities

     1,400      904      496      —  

Software contracts

     3,301      3,080      221      —  
                           

Total contractual cash obligations

   $ 14,474    $ 8,493    $ 4,504    $ 1,477
                           

 

(1) Includes amounts associated with former headquarters facilities lease as described in Item 2 — Properties.

We have excluded $6.5 million in liabilities for uncertain tax benefits from the contractual obligations table because we can not make a reasonable reliable estimate of the periodic cash settlements with the respective taxing authorities. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K/A for a discussion of income taxes.

Legal expenditures could also affect our liquidity. We are regularly subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business, see Note 11 “Commitments and Contingencies” in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Litigation may result in substantial costs and may divert management’s attention and resources, which may seriously harm our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Our revenue is generally denominated in the local currency of the contracting party. The majority of our revenue is denominated in U.S. dollars. In the year ended December 31, 2008, 5% and 10% of our revenue, was denominated in Canadian dollars and currencies other than the U.S. or Canadian dollar, respectively. Our expenses are generally denominated in the currencies in which our operations are located. Our expenses are incurred primarily in the United States and Canada, including the expenses associated with our largest research and development operations that are maintained in Canada, with a small portion of expenses incurred outside of

 

50


Table of Contents

North America where our other international sales offices are located. Our results of operations and cash flows are therefore subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly changes in the Canadian dollar, and to a lesser extent, to the Australian dollar, British pound sterling, Euro, Singapore dollar and New Zealand dollar, in which certain of our customer contracts are denominated. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the U.S. dollar weakened by approximately 3% against the Canadian dollar on an average basis compared to the same period in the prior year. This change in value did not have an effect on our earnings and should not have an effect on future earnings as a result of transfer pricing policy. Our planning process for 2009 includes estimated foreign exchange risk profile. If the currencies noted above uniformly fluctuated by plus or minus 50 basis points from our estimated rates, we would expect our results to change by approximately minus or plus $1.7 million. We do not currently enter into forward exchange contracts to hedge exposure denominated in foreign currencies or any derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. In the future, we may consider entering into hedging transactions to help mitigate our foreign currency exchange risk.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

We had cash and cash equivalents of $49.5 million at December 31, 2008. This compares to $86.1 million at December 31, 2007. These amounts were held primarily in cash or money market funds. Cash and cash equivalents are held for working capital purposes, and restricted cash amounts are held as security against various lease obligations. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. Due to the short-term nature of these investments, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates. Declines in interest rates, however, will reduce future interest income.

 

51


Table of Contents
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Taleo Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Taleo Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB No. 109,” effective January 1, 2007.

As described in Note 2, the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 have been restated.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated April 30, 2009 (October 27, 2009 as to the effects of the material weakness described in the fourth paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (as revised)) expressed an adverse opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California

April 30, 2009 (October 27, 2009 as to the effects of the Current Restatement discussed in Note 2)

 

52


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Taleo Corporation

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Taleo Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (as revised). Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our report dated April 30, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. As described in the following paragraph, a material weakness was subsequently identified as a result of the restatement of the Company’s previously issued 2008 consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, management has revised its assessment about the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and our present opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, as expressed herein, is different from that expressed in our previous report.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified as of December 31, 2008, and included in management’s assessment:

 

   

The Company’s controls to calculate stock-based compensation expense related to the application of the forfeiture rate were not designed effectively. As a result, a material weakness exists in the design of the controls over the calculation of stock-based compensation expense related to the application of the forfeiture rate. This control deficiency led to a misstatement of stock-based compensation expense, which was not prevented or detected on a timely basis, and resulted in a restatement of the Company’s 2008, 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements.

This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, and this report does not affect our report on such financial statements.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness identified above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control as of December 31, 2008, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

53


Table of Contents

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, of the Company and our report dated April 30, 2009 (October 27, 2009 as to the effects of the Current Restatement discussed in Note 2) expresses an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Current Restatement discussed in Note 2.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California

April 30, 2009 (October 27, 2009 as to the effects of the material weakness described in the fourth paragraph of Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (as revised))

 

54


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING (AS REVISED)

Management of Taleo Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Taleo”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Taleo’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

   

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of Taleo;

 

   

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of Taleo are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of Taleo; and

 

   

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of Taleo’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may change over time.

A deficiency in internal control over financial reporting exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A deficiency in design exists when (a) a control necessary to meet the control objective is missing or (b) an existing control is not properly designed so that, even if the control operates as designed, the control objective would not be met. A deficiency in operation exists when a properly designed control does not operate as designed, or when the person performing the control does not possess the necessary authority or competence to perform the control effectively. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

In connection with the Current Restatement discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements related to our accounting for stock-based compensation expense, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, re-assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. Management based its re-assessment on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s re-assessment included the evaluation of elements such as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies, and our overall control environment. Based upon this re-assessment, our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP because of the following material weakness:

 

   

Our controls to calculate stock-based compensation expense related to the application of the forfeiture rate were not designed effectively. As a result, a material weakness existed in the design of the controls over the calculation of stock-based compensation expense related to the application of the forfeiture rate. This control deficiency led to a misstatement of stock-based compensation expense, which was not prevented or detected on a timely basis, and resulted in a restatement of our 2008, 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements.

We reviewed the results of management’s assessment with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. Our independent registered public accounting firm, which audited the consolidated financial statements included in this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A, has issued an attestation report, included elsewhere herein, which expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/    MICHAEL GREGOIRE        

   

/s/    KATY MURRAY        

Michael Gregoire

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

   

Katy Murray

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

October 27, 2009     October 27, 2009

 

55


Table of Contents

TALEO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except shares and share data)

 

     December 31,  
     2008     2007  
     (As Restated)(1)     (As Restated)(1)  

ASSETS

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 49,462      $ 86,135   

Restricted cash

     521        288   

Accounts receivables, net of allowances of $884 and $369 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively

     49,167        30,255   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     10,977        5,694   

Investment credits receivable

     6,087        4,734   
                

Total current assets

     116,214        127,106   
                

Property and equipment, net

     25,250        23,178   

Restricted cash

     515        838   

Goodwill

     91,626        9,109   

Other intangibles, net

     44,802        1,404   

Other assets

     4,782        3,186   
                

Total assets

   $ 283,189      $ 164,821   
                

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   $ 24,877      $ 20,687   

Deferred revenue — application services and customer deposits

     54,421        32,234   

Deferred revenue — consulting services

     16,221        13,632   

Capital lease obligations, short-term

     1,101        38   
                

Total current liabilities

     96,620        66,591   
                

Long-term deferred revenue — application and customer deposits

     777        273   

Long-term deferred revenue — consulting services

     9,594        7,236   

Other liabilities

     3,258        4,706   

Capital lease obligations, long-term

     519        16   

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

    

Class B Redeemable Common Stock, $0.00001 par value, 4,038,287 shares authorized; no shares outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 655,652 shares outstanding at December 31, 2007, respectively

     —          —     
                

Total liabilities

     110,768        78,822   
                

Exchangeable share obligation

     —          331   
                

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Class A Common Stock; par value, $0.00001 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 31,120,614 and 25,442,373 shares outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively

     —          —     

Additional paid-in capital

     250,168        154,051   

Accumulated deficit

     (78,322     (70,194

Treasury stock, at cost, no shares outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 6,900 shares outstanding at December 31, 2007

     —          (195

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     575        2,006   
                

Total stockholders’ equity

     172,421        85,668   
                

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 283,189      $ 164,821   
                

 

(1) As restated — See Note 2 “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

56


Table of Contents

TALEO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except shares and per share data)

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2008     2007     2006  
     (As Restated)(1)     (As Restated)(1)     (As Restated)(1)  

Revenue:

      

Application

   $ 138,628      $ 105,032      $ 79,116   

Consulting

     29,791        23,038        15,864   
                        

Total revenue

     168,419        128,070        94,980   
                        

Cost of revenue:

      

Application

     32,376        22,642        19,394   

Consulting

     25,269        18,098        12,857   
                        

Total cost of revenue

     57,645        40,740        32,251   
                        

Gross profit

     110,774        87,330        62,729   
                        

Operating expenses:

      

Sales and marketing

     53,827        37,172        29,841   

Research and development

     30,994        23,197        19,722   

General and administrative

     32,382        24,281        21,619   

Restructuring and severance expense

     1,914        —          414   
                        

Total operating expenses

     119,117        84,650        71,596   
                        

Operating income/(loss)

     (8,343     2,680        (8,867
                        

Other income/(expense):

      

Interest income

     1,717        3,045        2,891   

Interest expense

     (199     (137     (107
                        

Total other income, net

     1,518        2,908        2,784   
                        

Income/(loss) before provision/(benefit) for income taxes

     (6,825     5,588        (6,083

Provision/(benefit) for income taxes

     1,303        3,083        (323
                        

Net income/(loss)

   $ (8,128   $ 2,505      $ (5,760
                        

Net income/(loss) per share attributable to Class A common stockholders — basic

   $ (0.29   $ 0.10      $ (0.29
                        

Net income/(loss) per share attributable to Class A common stockholders — diluted

   $ (0.29   $ 0.09      $ (0.29
                        

Weighted-average Class A common shares — basic

     27,569        24,116        20,031   
                        

Weighted-average Class A common shares — diluted

     27,569        28,777        20,031   
                        

 

(1) As restated — See Note 2 “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

57


Table of Contents

TALEO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006

(In thousands, except share data)

 

    Common Stock                                          
    Shares     Par Value   Additional
Paid-In-Capital
    Treasury
Stock
    Deferred
Comp
    Accumulated
Deficit
    Accum
Comprehensive
Other Income
(Loss)
    Total
Stockholders’
Equity
    Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 

Balances, January 1, 2006 As Previously Reported

  18,755,071      —     $ 124,947        —          (21     (53,701     473        71,698     
                                                           

Prior period adjustments(1)

  —        —       —          —          —          (14,297     (51     (14,348  

Balances, January 1, 2006 As Restated(1)

  18,755,071      —     $ 124,947      $ —        $ (21   $ (67,998   $ 422      $ 57,350     
                                                           

Employee stock options exercised

  917,918      —       2,355        —          —          —          —          2,355     

Issuance of ESPP shares

  64,513      —       616        —          —          —          —          616     

Warrants exercised

  53,801      —       1        —          —          —          —          1     

Shares issued to former stockholders of White Amber

  30,753      —       162        —          —          —          —          162     

Class B Common stock exchanged for Class A Common Stock

  2,164,476      —       961        —          —          —          —          961     

Shares acquired for payroll tax payments

  (14,413   —       —          (158     —          —          —          (158  

Restricted shares reacquired or forfeited

  (9,063   —       —          —          —          —          —          —       

Issuance of Restricted shares

  290,071      —       82        —          —          —          —          82     

Reversal of deferred compensation due to adoption of SFAS 123(R)

  —        —       (21     —          21        —          —          —       

IPO related cost

  —        —       3        —          —          —          —          3     

Stock based compensation(1)

  —        —       5,720        —          —          —          —          5,720     

Net loss(1)

  —        —       —          —          —          (5,760     —          (5,760   $ (5,760

Foreign currency translation adjustments(1)

  —        —       —          —          —          —          (177     (177     (177
                                                                 

Balances, December 31, 2006(1)

  22,253,127      —     $ 134,826      $ (158   $ —        $ (73,758   $ 245      $ 61,155      $ (5,937
                                                                 

Cumulative transition adjustment related to the adoption of FIN 48

  —        —       —          —          —          1,059        —          1,059     

Employee stock options exercised

  1,438,610      —       9,439        —          —          —          —          9,439     

Issuance of ESPP shares

  143,992      —       1,018        608        —          —          —          1,626     

Warrants exercised

  356,200      —       —          —          —          —          —          —       

Class B Common stock exchanged for Class A Common Stock

  1,218,159      —       548        —          —          —          —          548     

Shares acquired for payroll tax payments

  (34,678   —       —          (645     —          —          —          (645  

Restricted shares reacquired or forfeited

  (16,193   —       —          —          —          —          —          —       

Issuance of restricted shares

  83,156      —       248        —          —          —          —          248     

Stock based compensation(1)

  —        —       7,972        —          —          —          —          7,972     

Net income(1)

  —        —       —          —          —          2,505        —          2,505      $ 2,505   

Foreign currency translation adjustments(1)

  —        —       —          —          —          —          1,761        1,761        1,761   
                                                                 

Balances, December 31, 2007(1)

  25,442,373      —     $ 154,051      $ (195   $ —        $ (70,194   $ 2,006      $ 85,668      $ 4,266   
                                                                 

Employee stock options exercised

  698,231      —       7,742        —          —          —          —          7,742     

Class A Common stock issued for acquisition of Vurv

  3,823,192      —       73,444        —          —          —          —          73,444     

Class A Common stock exchange for Vurv stock options

  —        —       1,745        —          —          —          —          1,745     

Issuance of ESPP shares

  175,669      —       1,173        1,263        —          —          —          2,436     

Class B Common stock exchanged for Class A Common Stock

  655,652      —       282        —          —          —          —          282     

Shares acquired for payroll tax payments

  (49,326   —       —          (1,068     —          —          —          (1,068  

Restricted shares reacquired or forfeited

  (81,743   —       —          —          —          —          —          —       

Issuance of restricted shares

  456,566      —       242        —          —          —          —          242     

Stock based compensation(1)

  —        —       11,433        —          —          —          —          11,433     

Excess tax benefit associated with stock based compensation

  —        —       56        —          —          —          —          56     

Net loss(1)

  —        —       —          —          —          (8,128     —          (8,128   $ (8,128

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  —        —       —          —          —          —          (1,431     (1,431     (1,431
                                                                 

Balances, December 31, 2008(1)

  31,120,614      —     $ 250,168      $ —        $ —        $ (78,322   $ 575      $ 172,421      $ (9,559
                                                                 

 

(1) As restated — See Note 2 “Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

58


Table of Contents

TALEO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2008     2007     2006  
     (As Restated)(1)     (As Restated)(1)     (As Restated)(1)  

Cash flows from operating activities:

      

Net income/(loss)

   $ (8,128   $ 2,505      $ (5,760

Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Depreciation and amortization

     16,453        6,934        4,780   

(Gain)/loss on disposal of fixed assets and other assets

     (64     13        390   

Tenant inducements from landlord

     —          —          1,063   

Amortization of tenant inducements

     (152     (223     (266

Stock-based compensation expense

     11,433        7,972        5,720   

Director fees settled with stock

     242        248        82   

Bad debt expense (reversal)

     237        (69     254   

Interest earned on restricted cash

     —          1        2   

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition:

      

Accounts receivable

     (11,663     (2,590     (12,310

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     (3,836     (1,992     (1,888

Investment credit receivable

     (2,637     446        563   

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

     (5,329     831        5,866   

Deferred revenues and customer deposits

     21,198        16,114        10,866   
                        

Net cash provided by operating activities

     17,754        30,190        9,362   
                        

Cash flows from investing activities:

      

Purchases of property and equipment

     (11,055     (13,152     (10,290

Change in restricted cash

     375        2,664        (1,724

Purchase of investment

     (2,498     —          —     

Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired

     (49,665     (3,301     —     
                        

Net cash used in investing activities

     (62,843     (13,789     (12,014
                        

Cash flows from financing activities:

      

Principal payments on capital lease obligations

     (667     (357     (583

Excess tax benefits on the exercise of stock options

     56        —          —     

Treasury stock acquired to settle employee withholding liability

     (1,068     (645     (158

Proceeds from stock options, ESPP Shares and warrants exercised

     10,178        11,065        2,971   
                        

Net cash provided by financing activities

     8,499        10,063        2,230