Attached files

file filename
EX-32.1 - MILLER INDUSTRIES INCv162973_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - MILLER INDUSTRIES INCv162973_ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - MILLER INDUSTRIES INCv162973_ex31-2.htm

Washington, DC  20549
For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009
Commission File No. 1-5926
(Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

(State or Other Jurisdiction of
(Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
16295 N.W. 13th Ave., Miami,  Florida  33169
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(305) 621-0501
(Issuer’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered under Section 12(b)
of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, $.05 Par Value
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ¨   Accelerated filer ¨   Non-accelerated filer ¨   Smaller reporting company x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at April 30, 2009 was $223,000.
As of September 10, 2009, there were 2,982,662 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.




This Form 10-K contains “forward looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such forward looking statements represent the Company’s expectations and beliefs including, but not limited to, statements concerning the Company’s operations, performance, financial condition, growth or strategies.  For this purpose, any statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward looking statements.  Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as  “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate” or “continue” or the negative or other variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward looking statements.  The statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Company’s control, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of important factors, including but not limited to the potential impact of changes in interest rates, competition, credit risks and collateral, changes in local or regional economic conditions, the ability of the Company to continue its growth strategy, dependence on management and key personnel, and regulatory supervision.
ITEM 1.          BUSINESS
Miller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on January 21, 1963. The administrative offices of the Company are located at 16295 N.W. 13th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33169, and its telephone number is (305) 621-0501.
The Company’s business is the ownership and management of a 98,000 square feet warehouse located in Miami, Florida.
The Company had no employees during the 2009 and 2008 fiscal years.
The Company utilizes an independent contractor to perform administrative and bookkeeping services.
Description of Warehouse
The Company owns a one-story concrete block building located at 16295 N.W. 13th Avenue, Miami, Florida. This facility consists of 97,813 square feet, 7,000 of which is air-conditioned.  The building is zoned for use as a warehouse or light manufacturing facility.  The building has a relatively low ceiling, which has adversely affected leasing efforts.

At April 30, 2009, the building was subject to an outstanding first mortgage in favor of a commercial bank with a principal balance of approximately $1,394,000.  The loan accrues interest at 4.0% per annum and is payable in monthly installments of $10,000, with a balloon payment of $1,377,000 due October 2009.  The loan is secured by the Company’s land and building and a partial guarantee of the Company’s president.
Leasing Activities
The Company continues to seek long term commercial tenants for its building.  The building is located in an industrial park which contains many similar facilities.  Current rents for such facilities range from approximately $5.00 per square foot to approximately $7.50 per square foot and the occupancy rate in the area is approximately 80%.
During 2009, the Company leased its building to [three] tenants.  As of April 30, 2009, the future minimum rental income under these leases, excluding cost of living adjustments, was as follows:
  $ 327,000  
  $ 145,000  
  $ 206,000  

Insurance, Depreciation and Taxes
The Company believes that the building is adequately insured.  Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over five to 31.5 years for tax purposes and 5 to 30 years for accounting purposes.  Real estate taxes paid for calendar year 2009 were approximately $106,000.
Seaboard Chemical Corporation
In late 1991, the Company was identified by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (“DEHNR”) as a member of a large group of companies who had shipped hazardous waste to a disposal site owner and operated by Seaboard Chemical Corporation (“Seaboard”).  Accordingly, DEHNR issued a Notice of Responsibility to advise the Company of its liability as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) with respect to the site.
Seaboard had operated the site in Jamestown, North Carolina for the storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste materials for the period from 1976 to 1989.  Operations at the site ceased in 1989 when Seaboard declared bankruptcy.  Beginning in 1990, the bankruptcy trustee for Seaboard attempted to close the site in accordance with the terms of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”).  However, insufficient funds were available to allow the trustee to complete this work.  As a result, the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) and the DEHNR advised the trustee that if the clean up work were not completed, either one or both of the agencies would complete the work and would sue the responsible parties to recover the costs involved.  To avoid the possibility of this lawsuit, in October 1991, the Company entered into an agreement with other responsible parties to form a group to complete the site clean up work.  Over the next two years, the necessary steps were taken to complete the clean up of the surface contamination of the site.  In 1994, the Company joined a group to complete the groundwater clean up (“Phase II”).  Phase II was to begin as soon as a satisfactory plan was approved by the concerned authorities.

In June, 2009, the Company entered into a settlement agreement in which it agreed to settle any potential claims for a payment of $9,100.

Gold Coast Oil
In 1981, the Company was named by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) as one of many potential PRPs with respect to chemical pollution discovered at a site known as “Gold Coast Oil.”
In 1988, a settlement was negotiated between the EPA and certain PRPs including the Company, which resulted in a settlement of the EPA claim.  The PRPs subsequently negotiated a settlement among themselves in which the Company agreed to pay $50,000 of the anticipated clean up costs.  The Company’s insurance carrier at the time of the alleged violations agreed to pay $45,000 of this amount in return for a release from any future additional claims.
In January 1993, it was determined that additional funds would be required to complete the clean up of the Gold Coast Oil site.  The Company received an assessment of $10,000 for this obligation and has included such amount in accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheets.
Not applicable.



The Company’s common stock is currently traded on the over-the-counter market under the symbol “MLLS”.
The range of the high and low bid quotations for each quarter of the past two (2) fiscal years is as follows:

5/1/08  -  7/31/08
  $ .06     $ .052  
8/1/08  -  10/31/08
  $ .052     $ .045  
11/1/09  -  1/31/09
  $ .045     $ .045  
2/01/09  -  4/30/09
  $ .045     $ .045  

5/1/07  -  7/31/07
  $ .08     $ .08  
8/1/07  -  10/31/07
  $ .19     $ .08  
11/1/07  -  1/31/08
  $ .10     $ .06  
2/01/08  -  4/30/08
  $ .06     $ .06  

As of September 10, 2009, there were approximately 475 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.
The Company has not paid any cash dividends during the last three fiscal years.



Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s equity compensation plans at April 30, 2009:

Plan Category
Number of shares
of common stock
to be issued upon
exercise of
options, warrants
and rights
exercise price of
options, warrants
and rights
Number of shares of
common stock
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
first column)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
    -       -       -  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (1)
    $ 0.18       -  
    $ 0.18       -  

(1)           On June 30, 2005, the Company granted Mr. Napolitano stock options in recognition of the substantial benefits provided to the Company by Mr. Napolitano through his personal guaranty of the Company’s bank loan as well as the services in which he has rendered to the Company in his capacity as the Company’s sole officer and director.  Under the terms of the option agreement, Mr. Napolitano has the right to purchase up to 2,017,338 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.18 per share.  The options may be exercised at any time during the ten year term of the options.



Not Applicable
Results of Operations (2008 compared to 2009)
Rental Income
The Company’s results of operations are primarily dependant upon the rental income which it receives from leasing space in its building.  Rental income is a function of the percentage of the building which is occupied, and the level of rental rates.  Rental income during 2008 was $527,000, compared with $481,000 in 2009.  The increase in rental income was due to a higher level of occupancy at the building.
Hardware Sales
The Company receives revenue from the sale of replacement parts for the sliding glass doors and windows formerly manufactured by the Company.  These sales (net of cost of goods sold) were $500 in 2009 compared to $1,900 in 2008.  The sales decrease was due to a decrease in demand for replacement parts.
Other Income
The Company generated other income of $44,000 in 2008, compared to $22,000 in 2009.  Other income in 2008 and 2009 principally consisted of interest income.
Rental Expense (Excluding Interest)
The Company incurs rental expense in connection with the leasing of its building.  These expenses consist of management fees, insurance, real estate taxes, depreciation and amortization, insurance, maintenance and repairs, utility costs and outside services.  Rental expenses were $194,000 in 2008 and $240,000 in 2009.  The principal components were management fees ($36,000 in 2008 and $43,000 in 2009), taxes ($82,000 in 2008 and $106,000 in 2009), depreciation and amortization ($33,000 in 2008 and $31,000 in 2009), repairs and maintenance ($11,000 in 2008 and $9,000 in 2009) and insurance ($15,000 in 2008 and $25,000 in 2009).
Cost of Hardware Sales
The Company records the cost of its hardware sales in connection with the sale of replacement parts to customers of its former window and sliding glass door business.  These costs are tied to the level of hardware sales.  These costs were not material in 2008 and 2009.

Administrative Expenses
The Company’s administrative expenses were $48,000 in 2009, compared to $51,000 in 2008.
Interest Expense
The Company pays interest on the mortgage loan on its building.  Interest expense on the loan was $79,000 in 2009 compared to $110,000 in 2008.  The decrease was attributable to a decrease in the interest rate on the Company’s mortgage loan.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for taxes (before realization of prior years’ tax benefits) was $75,000 in 2008 and $41,000 in 2009.  In 2009, the Company also recorded a change of $131,000 in its valuation allowance related to its net operation loss carryforwards due to the decline in the Company’s profitability.
Net Income
As a result of the foregoing factors, the Company had a net loss of $36,000 in 2009, compared to a net income of $230,000 in 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s cash increased by $244,000 during fiscal year 2008 compared with an increase of approximately $159,000 during fiscal year 2009.  The increase in 2009 in cash was primarily due to positive cash flow from operations.  As of April 30, 2009, the Company’s cash position was approximately $1,478,000.
At April 30, 2009, the Company’s principal financing consisted of a loan with a principal balance of approximately $1,394,000 from a third party lender, secured by a lien on the Company’s building.  The loan bears interest at 4% per annum.  It is payable $10,000 per month, with a balloon payment October 2009 in the approximate amount of $1,377,000.  The note is collateralized by the Company’s land and building, along with the personal guaranty of the Company’s Chairman of the Board in the amount of 50% of the mortgage balance.  The Company expects to renew the loan in October 2009.
The Company believes that its working capital needs over the next twelve months will principally consist of funding routine maintenance of its building and alterations to the interior of the building to accommodate new tenants.  The Company believes that its existing cash reserves will allow the Company to continue operations at their current level for at least 12 more months.  However, the Company’s long term prospects ultimately depend on the Company’s ability to lease the space in its building at attractive rates.
The Company’s obligations to make payments under existing, material contracts consists of the following:

The Company is obligated to make payments under its existing mortgage loan.  At April 30, 2009, the outstanding balance of the loan was $1,394,000.  The loan bears interest at 4% per annum.  The loan is repayable in monthly installments of approximately $10,000, with a balloon payment of approximately $1,377,000 due in October 2009.
The Company has agreed to pay Harnap Corp., a corporation controlled by the Company’s president and principal shareholder, $3,500 per month for management fees.  Accrued fees as of April 30, 2009 were $317,000, all of which are payable upon the demand of Harnap.
Current Plans
The Company operates as a real estate investment and management company.  The Company currently has three tenants for its existing building and is seeking to obtain additional commercial tenants.
The Company’s principal operating expenses consist of management and professional fees associated with the administration of the Company, interest expense on the Company’s mortgage loan, real estate taxes and insurance.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has issued disclosure guidance for “Critical Accounting Policies.”  The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in subsequent periods.
The discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon its financial statements, the preparation of which takes into account estimates based on judgments and assumptions that affect certain amounts and disclosures.  Accordingly, actual results could differ from these estimates.  The accounting policies and estimates used and outlined in Note 1 to the Company’s financial statements, which are presented elsewhere in this Form 10-K, have been applied consistently as at April 30, 2009 and 2008, and for the years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008.  The Company’s representatives who are involved in the preparation of its financial statements and this report believe that the following accounting policies represent the Company’s critical accounting policies:
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets:  The Company periodically assesses the carrying value of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable.  When the Company determines that the carrying value of long-lived assets may be impaired, the measurement of any impairment is based on a projected discounted cash flows method.  While the Company believes that this method is reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows may significantly affect the measurement of impairment.

Revenue Recognition:  Rental income is recognized when it becomes receivable under the terms of each lease.  Hardware sales are recognized upon receipt of payment from customers.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
The Company is not a party to any material off-balance sheet arrangements.
The following is a summary of the Company’s contractual obligations, including certain on-balance sheet obligations, at April 30, 2009:
Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations
Less Than
1 Year
More Than 5
Long Term Debt
  $ 1,394,000     $ 1,394,000       -       -       -  
Capital Lease Obligations
    -       -       -       -       -  
Operating Leases
    -       -       -       -       -  
Purchase Obligations
    -       -       -       -       -  
Other Long Term Debt
  $ 1,394,000     $ 1,394,000       -       -       -  

The Company’s financial statements and supplementary financial schedules are attached as an exhibit to this report. See Items 14(a) and 14(b).
In connection with the filing of this Form 10-K, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of April 30, 2009.  The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Executive Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of April 30, 2009.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2009.



The directors and executive officers of the Company are as follows:
Angelo Napolitano
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Each director is elected for a period of one (1) year, or until his successor is duly elected by the shareholders. Officers serve at the will of the Board of Directors.
Angelo Napolitano, age 72 has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 1992. He has been a Director of the Company since 1988 and Chairman since July 1989. Mr. Napolitano is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Harnap Corp., a commercial real estate management company which he founded in 1971.  Since 1975, Mr. Napolitano has served as a director and President of Sunshine State Industrial Park Authority, the property owners’ association for the industrial park in which the Company’s building is located.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to the Company, all of the Company’s directors and officers have filed reports on a timely basis.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Company has determined that it does not have an audit committee financial expert.  The Company has not been able to identify an individual willing to serve as an audit committee financial expert for the Company.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Company’s officers and persons performing similar functions.
The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation paid by the Company to the Company’s chief executive officer. None of the Company’s officers in fiscal 2009 received compensation in excess of $100,000.

Name and Position
Fiscal Year
Salary (1)
Stock Options
Angelo Napolitano, Chief Executive Officer
  $ 43,000       -  
  $ 36,000       -  
  $ 36,000       -  

(1)           Includes management fees paid to Harnap Corp., a company controlled by Mr. Napolitano, and director fees paid to Mr. Napolitano.

Options Granted in 2009
No stock options were granted by the Company in the 2009 fiscal year.

Aggregate Option Exercises in 2009 and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
The following table sets forth information with respect to the exercise of options in the 2009 fiscal year and the value of unexercised options held as of the end of the 2009 fiscal year held by the executive officer listed above.

Acquired on
Exercise (#)
Number of
Options at
Value of
Unexercised In-the-
  Money Options at  
4/30/09 ($)
Angelo Napolitano
                2,017,338 / 0       N/A  

Management Agreement
In October 1992, the Company agreed to pay Harnap Corp. a monthly management fee, which is currently $3,500 per month.  Harnap Corp. is owned and controlled by Angelo Napolitano, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board.  As of April 30, 2009, accrued management fees totaled $317,000.

Compensation of Directors
No amounts were paid to directors during the 2009 fiscal year for services as directors.
Stock Options
On June 30, 2005, the Company granted Mr. Napolitano stock options in recognition of the substantial benefits provided to the Company by Mr. Napolitano through his personal guaranty of the Company’s bank loan as well as the services in which he has rendered to the Company in his capacity as the Company’s sole officer and director.  Under the terms of the option agreement, Mr. Napolitano has the right to purchase up to 2,017,338 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.18 per share.  The options may be exercised at any time during the ten year term of the options.



To the knowledge of management, as of September 10, 2009, the following persons beneficially owned 5% or more of the common stock of the Company:
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner
Beneficial Owner
Of Class
Angelo Napolitano
1521 N.W. 165th Street
Miami, FL  33169
    3,148,594 (1)     63.0 %
Elizabeth Schuldiner Revocable
Trust u/a 3/20/90 (2)
80 West 12th Street
New York,  NY  10011
    220,567       7.4 %
Walter P. Carucci (3)
Uncle Mills Partners (3)
c/o Carr Securities Corp. (3)
14 Vanderventer Avenue
Suite 210
Port Washington, NY  11050
    273,394       9.2 %

(1)           Mr. Napolitano has sole voting and investment power with respect to 1,121,256 shares which he holds of record. Mr. Napolitano has shared voting and investment power with respect to 10,000 shares which he owns jointly with his wife, Mrs. Helen Napolitano.  Mr. Napolitano is entitled to acquire an additional 2,017,338 shares under outstanding stock options.
(2)           Based on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 9, 2006.  Elizabeth Schuldiner Revocable Trust has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares.
(3)           Based on information disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 17, 2009.  Walter P. Carucci and Uncle Mills Partners have identified themselves as a “group” as that term is used in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  Walter P. Carucci has sole voting and investment power with respect to 100,889 shares.  Uncle Mills Partners has sole and investment power with respect to 172,505 shares.
The shares of common stock beneficially owned by the Company’s sole director and executive officer as of September 10, 2009 were as follows:

Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner
Beneficial Owner (1)
Of Class
Angelo Napolitano
1521 N.W. 165th Street
Miami, FL  33169
    3,148,594 (2)     63.0 %(2)

(1)           Except as otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power as to the listed shares.
(2)           With respect to Mr. Napolitano’s shares, see Note (1) to the preceding table.



The Company has entered into a brokerage agreement with Napolitano Realty Corporation (“NRC”) with respect to the lease of the Company’s building.  The President of NRC is the son of Mr. Angelo Napolitano, the Company’s President and Chairman of the Board.  The agreement provides for a 6% commission to be paid to NRC on sales or lease proceeds received by the Company.  No commissions were paid under this agreement for the 2009 fiscal year.
Larry Wolfe, CPA performed the review of each of the Company’s quarterly reports for the 2009 fiscal year and the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended April 30, 2009.
The following table presents fees billed for professional audit and other services rendered by Larry Wolfe, CPA for the periods presented.

Fiscal 2009
Fiscal 2008
Fees billed by Larry Wolfe, CPA
Audit Fees(1)
  $ 15,100     $ 13,633  
Audit Related Fees (2)
Tax Fees(3)
  $ 750       500  
All Other Fees (4)
  $ 15,850     $ 14,133  

Audit Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees,” including registration statement filings.
Tax Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax consultation and tax planning (domestic and international).  These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance and international tax planning.
All Other Fees consist of fees for products and services other than the services reported above.

ITEM 15. 
Financial Statements
Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
Balance Sheets as of April 30, 2009 and 2008
Statements of Operations for Years ended April 30, 2008 and 2007.

Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity (Deficiency) for Years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008

Statements of Cash Flows for Years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008
Notes to Financial Statements

All schedules have been omitted because they are inapplicable, not required or the information is included elsewhere in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Articles of Incorporation
   (Note 1)
Articles of Amendment
   (Note 2)
   (Note 1)
Amendment to By-laws – Indemnification
   (Note 1)
Amendment to By-laws —Control Share Acquisitions
   (Note 3)
Indemnification Agreement with Directors
   (Note 4)
Amended, Restated and Consolidated Promissory Note dated October 13, 1999 made by Miller Industries, Inc. in favor of City National Bank of Florida
   (Note 5)
Code of Ethics
   (Note 6)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Note 1
Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K filed with the Commission for the year ended April 30, 1981.
Note 2
Incorporated by reference from Form 10-K filed with the Commission for the year ended April 30, 1985.

Note 3
Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K filed with the Commission for the year ended April 30, 1993.
Note 4
Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K filed with the Commission for the year ended April 30, 1990.
Note 5
Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-K filed with the Commission for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1999.
Note 6
Incorporated by reference from the Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004.
Filed as part of this report
Reports on Form 8-K
There were no reports on Form 8-K for the three months ended April 30, 2009.




In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized on October 9, 2009.

   /s/  Angelo Napolitano
Angelo Napolitano, President
And Chief Executive Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on October 9, 2009.

  /s/ Angelo Napolitano
President, Chief Executive
Angelo Napolitano
Officer, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial Officer)
(Principal Accounting Officer)



Shareholders and Board of Directors
Miller Industries, Inc.
Miami, Florida

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Miller Industries, Inc. as of April 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ deficiency, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended April 30, 2009.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audits.

I conducted my audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor was I engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  My audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, I express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Miller Industries, Inc. as of April 30, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended April 30, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/  Larry Wolfe
Certified Public Accountant

Miami, Florida
August 18, 2009



APRIL 30, 2009 AND 2008


Investment Property:
  $ 161,443     $ 161,443  
Building and Improvements
    1,049,908       1,049,908  
Machinery and Equipment
    11,106       11,106  
Furniture and Fixtures
    10,251       10,251  
Total Cost
  $ 1,232,708     $ 1,232,708  
Less Accumulated Depreciation
    860,467       843,540  
Net Book Value
  $ 372,241     $ 389,168  
Other Assets:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
    1,477,521       1,318,950  
Accounts Receivable (Less Allowance for Doubtful Accounts of $ 15,000 in 2009 and 2008
    10,561       14,525  
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
    2,095       9,469  
Deferred Lease Incentive (Net of Accumulated Amortization - $ 53,403 in 2009 and $50,802)
    4,195       22,798  
Loan Costs, Less Accumulated Amortization of $25,030 and $22,395 in 2009 and 2008, respectively
    1,318       9,953  
Deferred Tax Assets
    11,000       183,000  
Deferred Rent Receivable
    ––       16,192  
Total Other Assets
  $ 1,506,690       1,568,887  
  $ 1,878,931     $ 1,958,055  



Mortgage and Notes Payable
  $ 1,394,343     $ 1,449,945  
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
    428,301       419,202  
Tenant’s Deposits and Advance Rent
    72,640       69,650  
Total Liabilities
  $ 1,895,284     $ 1,938,797  
Shareholders’ Deficiency:
Common Stock - $.05 par, 5,00,000 shares Authorized; 2,982,662 shares issued and Outstanding
  $ 149,133     $ 149,133  
Paid-In Capital
    1,191,929       1,191,929  
    (1,357,415 )     (1,321,804 )
Total Shareholders’ Equity (Deficiency)
  $ (16,353 )   $ 19,258  
  $ 1,878,931     $ 1,958,055  

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.




Rental Income
  $ 480,742     $ 527,320  
Hardware Sales (Net)
    501       1,936  
Other Income
    21,741       43,811  
Total Revenues
  $ 502,984     $ 573,067  
Rental Expenses (Except Interest)
  $ 239,748     $ 194,408  
Cost of Hardware Sales
    -       -  
    48,293       51,366  
    78,554       110,319  
Total Expenses
  $ 366,595     $ 356,093  
Income Before Tax Provision
  $ 136,389     $ 216,974  
Provision (Benefit) for Income Tax:
Federal Income Tax
  $ 33,624     $ 63,323  
State Income Tax
    7,226       11,658  
Provision for Income Tax Before Realization of  Prior Years’ Tax Benefit
  $ 40,850     $ 74,981  
Tax Benefits of Net Operating Loss Carryforward - Change in Valuation Allowance
    131,150       (87,981 )
Total Provision (Credit) for Income Tax  (Net of Tax Benefits) and Change in  Valuation Allowance
  $ 172 ,000     $ (13,000 )
Net Income  (Loss)
  $ (35,611 )   $ 229,974  
Income (Loss) per Common Share
  $ (.01 )   $ .08  
Weighted Average Shares of Common Stock Outstanding
(Basic and Diluted)
     2,982,662        2,982,662  

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.




Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)
  $ (35,611 )   $ 229,974  
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by (used for) Operating Activities:
    16,927       16,927  
    14,304       15,904  
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Adjustment
    172.000       (13,000 )
Bad Debt Provision
    10,027       12,000  
Loss on Deferred Lease Incentives
    6,934       -  
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
(Increase) Decrease in Accounts Receivable
    3,964       (21,906 )
(Increase) Decrease in Deferred Rent Receivable
    6,165       8,070  
(Increase) Decrease in Prepaid Expenses and Other
    7,374       (3,953 )
Increase (Decrease) in Accounts Payable and Accruals
    9,099       43,499  
Increase (Decrease) in Tenant Deposits and Advances
    2,990       -  
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
  $ 214,173     $ 287,515  
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Acquisition of Property, Equipment, and Intangible
  $ -     $ -  
Net Cash (used by) Investing Activities
  $ -     $ -  
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Principal Payments Under Borrowings
  $ (55,602 )   $ (43,130 )
Proceeds from Borrowings
    -       -  
Net Cash Provided by (used by) Financing Activities
  $ (55,602 )   $ (43,130 )
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
  $ 158,571     $ 244,385  
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the Beginning of Year
    1,318,950       1,074,565  
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of Year
  $ 1,477,521     $ 1,318,950  
Additional Cash Flow Information:
Cash Payments During the Year
  $ 80,733     $ 110,979  
Income Taxes
  $ -     $ -  

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.




Common Stock
Balance at April 30, 2007
    2,982,662       149,133     $ 1,191,929     $ (1,551,778 )   $ (210,716 )
Net Income - 2008
    -       -       -       229,974       229,974  
Balance at April 30, 2008
    2,982,662     $ 149,133     $ 1,191,929     $ (1,321,804 )   $ 19,258  
Net (Loss)–2009
    -       -       -       (35,611 )     (35,611 )
Balance at April 30, 2009
    2,982,662     $ 149,133     $ 1,191,929     $ (1,357,415 )   $ (16,353 )

See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.



APRIL 30, 2009  AND  2008

NOTE A - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business -

Miller Industries, Inc., a Florida corporation, currently and since August 1991, has been engaged in the ownership and management of 98,000 square feet of offices and warehouse located in Miami, Florida. The Company also distributes hardware parts for aluminum windows and doors previously manufactured by Miller.  During August 1991, the Company discontinued its operations of manufacturing of aluminum windows and doors pursuant to a plan of reorganization.

Real Property -

Property is carried at cost.  The Company calculates depreciation under the straight-line method at annual rates based upon the estimated service lives of each type of asset.  These service lives are generally as follows:

Building and Improvements
10 to 30 years
Machinery and Equipment
 7 years
Furniture and Fixtures
 7 years

Real property and equipment, with an original cost of approximately $ 720,000, have been fully depreciated at April 30, 2009.

Deferred Costs -

Deferred lease incentive and loan costs are carried at cost.  The Company amortizes these assets on a straight-line basis up to 10 years. Deferred Rent Receivable is recoverable over the period of the lease.

Income Taxes -

The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”.  Under SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured by applying enacted tax rates and laws to taxable years in which such differences are expected to reverse.



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

Earnings Per Share -

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, basic earnings per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each year and excludes any potential dilution.  Diluted earning per share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding as well as potentially dilutive common shares, which in the Company’s case include shares issuable under the stock option agreement.  The Company’s outstanding options are not included in the computation of basic or diluted earnings per share since they are anti-dilutive.  At April 30, 2009 potentially dilutive securities consist of an option that could be converted into 2,017,338 common shares.
Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

The balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. At April 30, 2009, and 2008 the Company’s uninsured bank balances approximated $1,173,000 and $ 376,000 respectively. The Company’s Cash Equivalents at April 30, 2008 was composed of approximately $ 800,000 of U.S. Treasury Bills.

Financial Instruments -

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, other assets, accounts payable, and debt approximate fair value.

Concentrations -

The Company is subject to certain risk arising from the concentration of its tenant income from entities that comprise 10% or more of the Company’s revenue. Tenant “A” 49%  of Revenue.  Tenant “B” 33% of Revenue.  Tenant “C” 17% of Revenue.
Revenue Recognition -

The Company recognizes rental income on a straight-line basis over the respective lease terms.  In accordance with SFAS No. 141.  The Company recognizes hardware sales upon shipment of goods to customers.

Environmental Cleanup Matters -

The Company expenses environmental expenditures related to existing conditions resulting from past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernable.  The Company determines its liability on a site-by-site basis and records a liability at the time when it is probable and can be reasonably estimated.



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

Use of Estimates -

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes Actual results could differ from those estimates.  The most significant estimates included in the preparation of the financial statements are related to income taxes, asset lives, accruals and valuation allowances.

Comprehensive Income -

In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130 “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1997.  SFAS No. 130 establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose financial statements which requires the Company to (i) classify items of other comprehensive income by their nature in a financial statement and (ii) display the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in-capital in the equity section of the balance sheet.  The company does not have any comprehensive income for fiscal 2009 and 2008.

Long-Lived Assets -

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) approved SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.  SFAS No. 144 replaces SFAS No. 121 “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of”.  The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 on May 1, 2002 as required, and the statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.  Under SFAS No. 144, the Company must consider whether indicators of impairment of long-lived assets are present, determine whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets in question is less than their carrying amounts, and to recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amounts of the assets over their respective fair values.  The respective fair values of the Company’s long-lived assets exceeded their carrying amounts at April 30, 2009 based on a quoted market price.



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

Segments -

The Company adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (“SFAS 131").  SFAS 131 superseded SFAS No. 14, Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise.  SFAS 131 establishes standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports.  SFAS 131 also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers.  The Company only has one business segment.

Derivative Instruments -

In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133"), which is required to be adopted in years beginning after June 15, 2000.  SFAS 133 will require the Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.  Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income.  If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives will either be offset against the change in fair value of hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings.  The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings.  The Company has determined that SFAS 133 did not have an effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.  This statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133.  SFAS No. 149 improves financial reporting by requiring that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly.

Stock-Based Compensation -

In December 2004, the FASB issued FAS 123R, Share-Based Payment. The new rule requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The scope of SFAS 123R includes a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. SFAS 123R replaces SFAS 123 and Accounting Principles Board option 25. The company elected to early adopt SFAS 123R on April 30, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 123R resulted in additional compensation expense of approximately $65,000 for fiscal 2006.



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

Pensions and Other Post-Retirement Benefits -

Effective January 3, 2001, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 132, Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and other Post-Retirement Benefits (“SFAS 132").  SFAS 132 supersedes the disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions, and SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Post-Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.  The overall objective of SFAS 132 is to improve and standardize disclosures about pensions and other post-retirement benefits and to make the required information more understandable.  The adoption of SFAS 132 did not affect results of operations or financial position.

The Company has not initiated benefit plans to date which would require disclosure under the statement.

Advertising Costs -

Advertising costs are charged to operations in the period incurred.  The Company has not incurred any advertising costs for fiscal 2009 and 2008.

Business Concentrations

Rental income of the Company’s office and warehouse building is subject to the economic conditions of the industrial real estate market place.  Changes in this industry may significantly affect management’s estimates and the Company’s performance.
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections -
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.  This new standard replaces APB opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements, among other changes, SFAS 154 requires that a voluntary change in accounting principle be applied retrospectively with all prior period financial statements presented on the new accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to do so.  SFAS No. 154 also provides that a change in method of depreciating or amortizing a long-lived non-financial asset be accounting for as a change in estimate prospectively, and corrections of errors in previously issued financial statements should be termed a “restatement.”  The new standard is effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005.  The adoption of SFAS No. 154 did not have a material impact on the company’s financial condition or result of operations.



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

Tenant’s Security Deposits
The Company requires security deposits from lessees for the duration of the lease.  The security deposits are refunded when the tenant vacates, provided the tenant has not damaged the space and is current on rental payments.
Fair Value Measurements -

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS  No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell as asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts.  SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates.  The Hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy.  SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities -
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “ The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”.  SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value.  The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.  SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities.  SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  The Company has not yet determined whether it will elect the fair value option for any of its financial instruments.



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE B - Mortgage Payable
Principal balances outstanding and details of notes payable are summarized as follows:

4% note payable, collateralized by mortgage on land and building, improvements, personal property, collateral assignment of all rents and leases, along with the personal guaranty of the Company’s Chairman of the Board to 50% of all sums due under the loan.  In addition, the guarantor shall indemnify lender from any and all liability which may result from the environmental condition of the property.  The note is payable in monthly installments of $10,071 (including interest) with a final payment of approximately $1,377,000 due October 2009.
  $ 1,394,343     $ 1,449,945  

Payments of principal required on the foregoing debt are as follows:
Fiscal Year
  $ 1,394,343  

Land, buildings and improvements,  with an approximate cost of $1,222,000 and an approximate net book value of $ 381,900 are pledged as collateral for these obligations.

NOTE C – Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:
  $ 42,423     $ 85,508  
    (1,573 )     (10,527 )
Tax Benefit of Net Operating
Loss Carryforward and Addition to Valuation Allowance
    131,150       (87,981 )
  $ 172,000     $ (13,000 )



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

Deferred income taxes arise primarily due to temporary differences in recognizing certain revenues and expenses for tax purposes, the required use of extended lives for calculation of depreciation for tax purposes, and the expected use of tax loss carryforwards in future periods.  The components of the net deferred tax asset at April 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

Properties and Equipment principally due to depreciation
  $ 59,296     $ 57,899  
Compensation – Value of Stock Option Granted
    24,599       24,599  
Provision for Bad Debts
    5,640       5,640  
Net operating loss carry forward (Net of $ 347,747 expired in 2007)
    87,600       138,882  
Total gross deferred tax assets
  $ 177,135     $ 227,020  
Less: Valuation allowance
    166,135       44,020  
Net Deferred Tax Asset
  $ 11,000     $ 183,000  

A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the deferred tax assets to a level which, more likely than not, will be realized.  The net deferred assets reflect management’s assessment of the amount which will be realized from future taxable earnings or alternative tax strategies.  The valuation allowance was increased by approximately $172,000 for 2009, and decreased by approximately $ 13,000 for 2008.

At April 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $ 233,000 of Federal and State net operating loss carry’s forward available to offset future taxable income. The net operating loss carryforwards will expire as follows:

  $ 60,000  
  $ 233,000  

At April 30, 2009, the Company had alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of approximately $3,500 which my be carried forward indefinitely.

Total Federal tax expense for years ended April 30, 2009 and 2008 differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34% to income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax for the following reasons:



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

Of Pre-Tax
Of Pre-Tax
Income before provision for income taxes
  $ 136,389       100 %   $ 216,974       100 %
Computed expected tax expense
  $ 46,372       34 %   $ 73,771       34 %
Federal tax (benefit) of State Income Tax
    (2,457 )     (2 )     (3,964 )     (2 )
Sur Tax Exemption
    (10,291 )     (7 )     (6,484 )     (3 )
Federal Tax Before Tax Benefits
  $ 33,624       25 %   $ 63,323       29 %
Tax Benefits of Net Operating Loss Carryforwards- Change in Valuation Allowance
    113,376       83       (74,323 )     (34 )
Actual Federal Tax (Benefits)
  $ 147,000       108 %   $ (11,000 )     (5 ) %
NOTE D - Rental Income
During 2009 the company leased warehouse and manufacturing space to three unrelated third parties under leases that expire at various dates thru fiscal 2013.  Rental income approximated $ 481,000 and $ 527,000 for fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively.  Rental income from these leases amounted to 99 % of the total 2009 rental income and 100 % of the total 2008 rental income.

Effective October 31, 2008 a tenant leasing approximately 23,800 square feet vacated the building and it’s lease obligations.  For the year ended April 30, 2009 The Company charged to expense deferred rent receivable for approximately $ 10,000 and Deferred Lease Incentives in the approximate amount of $ 7,000 in connection with this tenant.

Future minimum rental income under non-cancelable leases, excluding cost of living adjustments are as follows:

  $ 327,234  
  $ 145,318  
  $ 145,318  
  $ 60,550  



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE E -  (Rental Expenses (Except for Interest)

Rental expenses consisted of:

Bad Debt- Provision
  $ 10,027     $ 12,000  
Commissions and Consulting
    3,682       -  
Depreciation and Amortization
    31,231       32,831  
    25,125       15,321  
Loss on Deferred Lease Incentives
    6,934       -  
Management Fees
    43,000       36,000  
Outside Services
    2,399       2,099  
Repairs and Maintenance
    8,656       10,546  
    2,518       3,491  
    106,176       82,120  
  $ 239,748     $ 194,408  

NOTE F - Administrative Expenses

Administrative expenses consisted of:

Accounting and Legal
  $ 22,474     $ 24,868  
Office Supplies/Postage/Other
    542       668  
Stockholders’ Expenses
    24,309       24,286  
    968       1,544  
  $ 48,293     $ 51,366  

NOTE G - Related Party Transactions
Management fees in the amount of $43,000 for 2009 and $36,000 for 2008 were incurred by the Company to Harnap Corp., which is controlled by the Chairman of the Board of Miller Industries, Inc.  Harnap Corp. was reimbursed for bookkeeping services, tenant improvements, repairs, and office supplies during fiscal 2009 and 2008 for approximately $ 18,000 for each year. Included in accounts payable is approximately $ 317,000 for 2009  and 2008 that is owned to Harnap Corp.  The mortgage is guaranteed by the Company’s Chairman for up to 50% of all sums due.



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE H – Stock Option Agreement
On June 30, 2005 the Company issued stock options to Angelo Napolitano in exchange for the benefits he has provided to the Company through his personal guarantee of the company’s bank loan, and the services rendered by Mr. Napolitano in his capacity as the company’s sole officer and director.  The options vest 100% at the grant date and expire in 10 years from the grant date.  The company granted options to Mr. Napolitano to purchase up to 2,017,338 shares of the Company’s Common Stock during the term of the Options at a price equal to $ .18 per share (Exercise Price).

The average fair values of the options granted during fiscal 2006 were estimated at  $.0324, using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model, which included the following assumptions:
Stock Price
  $ .05  
Strike Price
Expected Life
9.17 years
Risk-Free Interest Rate
    3.80 %
    79.23 %

Approximately $65,400 was recorded as compensation expense for fiscal 2006 related to this grant.

A summary of the status of the company’s stock option agreement as of April 30, 2009 and 2008, and changes during the years then ended were as follows:

Price Per
Price Per
To Option
To Option
Outstanding, May 1
  $ 2,017,338     $ .18     $ 2,017,338     $ .18  
    -       -       -       -  
    -       -       -       -  
    -       -       -       -  
April 30
    2,017,338       .18       2,017,338       .18  



Miller Industries, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements

The following summarizes information concerning currently outstanding and exercisable options at April 30, 2009.

Options Outstanding/ Exercisable
Exercise Price
At 4/30/09
$ .18       2,017,338       6.2  

NOTE I – Other Matters, and Subsequent Events
The Company’s building insurance policy thru May 15, 2009 excludes windstorm and hail coverage.  Effective May 15, 2009 Windstorm and Hail coverage was included in the Company’s building insurance policy.

On May 21, 2009, the Company paid $ 9,114 to settle it’s liability for environmental remediation costs at the seaboard chemical site in Jamestown, North Carolina.  This amount had been accrued for.