Attached files

file filename
EX-23 - EX-23 - CANTEL MEDICAL LLCa09-31553_1ex23.htm
EX-21 - EX-21 - CANTEL MEDICAL LLCa09-31553_1ex21.htm
EX-32 - EX-32 - CANTEL MEDICAL LLCa09-31553_1ex32.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - CANTEL MEDICAL LLCa09-31553_1ex31d1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - CANTEL MEDICAL LLCa09-31553_1ex31d2.htm

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009

 

 

or

 

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from                    to                   

 

Commission File No. 001-31337

 

CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

22-1760285

(State or other jurisdiction of

 

(I.R.S. employer

incorporation or organization)

 

identification no.)

 

 

 

150 Clove Road, Little Falls, New Jersey

 

07424

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (973) 890-7220

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange
on which registered

Common Stock, $.10 par value

 

New York Stock Exchange

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o   No x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o   No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x   No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o    No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   Yes x   No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer x

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o   No x

 

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, as quoted by the New York Stock Exchange on that date: $188,916,077.

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the close of business on September 18, 2009: 16,656,144

 

Documents incorporated by reference:  Definitive proxy statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Registrant.

 

 

 



 

Forward Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and releases issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, or forecasts about our businesses, the industries in which we operate, and the beliefs and assumptions of management; they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. We have tried, wherever possible, to identify such statements by using words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “goal,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,”  “may,” “could,” and variations of such words and similar expressions. In addition, any statements that refer to predictions or projections of our future financial performance, anticipated growth and trends in our businesses, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions about future events, activities or developments and are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict including, among other things, the following:

 

·                  the increasing market share of single-use dialyzers relative to reuse dialyzers in the United States

·                  further industry consolidation resulting in greater buying power by some of our customers

·                  our dependence on a concentrated number of customers in three of our largest segments

·                  novel H1N1 flu severity and level of urgency developed by customers with respect to pandemic preparedness

·                  the volatility of fuel and oil prices on our raw materials and distribution costs

·                  the acquisition of new businesses and successfully integrating and operating such businesses

·                  the adverse impact of increased competition on selling prices and our ability to compete effectively

·                  foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and trade barriers

·                  the impact of significant government regulation on our businesses

 

You should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not consider the foregoing items to be a complete list of all potential risks or uncertainties. See “Risk Factors” below for a discussion of the above risk factors and certain additional risk factors that you should consider before investing in the shares of our common stock.

 

All forward-looking statements herein speak only as of the date of this Report. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

 

For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.

 

2



 

PART I

 

Item 1.                    BUSINESS.

 

General

 

We are a leading provider of infection prevention and control products in the healthcare market, specializing in the following operating segments:

 

·                  Water Purification and Filtration: Water purification equipment and services, filtration and separation products, and disinfectants for the medical, pharmaceutical, biotech, beverage and commercial industrial markets.

 

·                  Healthcare Disposables: Single-use, infection control products used principally in the dental market including face masks, towels and bibs, tray covers, saliva ejectors, germicidal wipes, plastic cups, sterilization pouches and disinfectants.

 

·                  Dialysis: Medical device reprocessing systems, sterilants/disinfectants, dialysate concentrates and other supplies for renal dialysis.

 

·                  Endoscope Reprocessing: Medical device reprocessing systems, disinfectants, enzymatic detergents and other supplies used to clean and high-level disinfect flexible endoscopes.

 

·                  Therapeutic Filtration: Hollow fiber membrane filtration and separation technologies for medical applications. (Included in All Other reporting segment).

 

·                  Specialty Packaging: Specialty packaging and thermal control products, as well as related compliance training, for the transport of infectious and biological specimens and thermally sensitive pharmaceutical, medical and other products. (Included in All Other reporting segment).

 

Most of our equipment, consumables and supplies are used to help prevent or control the occurrence or spread of infections.

 

Throughout this document, references to “Cantel,” “us,” “we,” “our,” and the “Company” are references to Cantel Medical Corp. and its subsidiaries, except where the context makes it clear the reference is to Cantel itself and not its subsidiaries.

 

Fiscal 2009 Acquisition

 

Acquisition of G.E.M. Water Systems Int’l, LLC

 

On July 31, 2009, we purchased substantially all of the assets of G.E.M. Water Systems Int’l, LLC (“G.E.M.”), including the building housing its operations, for $4,468,000, including transaction costs. G.E.M, based in Buena Park, California, designs, installs and services high quality water and bicarbonate systems for use in dialysis clinics, hospitals and other healthcare facilities. The acquired business had pre-acquisition revenues of approximately $3.5 million. The results of operations of G.E.M. are not included in our results of operations for fiscal 2009 because the acquisition occurred on the final day of our fiscal year, but the assets of G.E.M. are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 31, 2009. The principal reason for the acquisition was the strengthening of our sales and service presence and base of business in California with a significant concentration of dialysis clinics and healthcare institutions. The operating results of G.E.M. will be included in our Water Purification and Filtration segment.

 

3



 

Reporting Segments

 

The following table gives information as to the percentage of consolidated net sales from continuing operations accounted for by each of our reporting segments:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

%

 

%

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water Purification and Filtration

 

27.4

 

27.5

 

22.4

 

Healthcare Disposables

 

24.7

 

23.5

 

26.3

 

Dialysis

 

21.7

 

24.1

 

26.8

 

Endoscope Reprocessing

 

20.1

 

18.8

 

17.8

 

All Other

 

6.1

 

6.1

 

6.7

 

 

 

100.0

 

100.0

 

100.0

 

 

For a presentation of net sales, operating income and total assets by reporting segment, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Water Purification and Filtration

 

General

 

We design, develop, manufacture, sell, install and service water purification systems and accessories for dialysis and other specific healthcare applications, research laboratories and pharmaceutical, beverage and commercial industrial customers. These systems always start with potable city water and provide total purification solutions specific to our customers’ needs and site conditions, ranging from low-volume, reverse osmosis and deionization systems, to high-volume, complete turnkey purification systems. We generally sell the equipment directly to our customers in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada and through various third-party distributors in international markets.

 

Purification systems can include combinations of proven treatment methods such as (i) carbon filtration, which removes chlorine and dissolved organic contamination by adsorption; (ii) reverse osmosis (RO), which is a filtration process that forces liquid through non-porous or semi-porous membranes to remove particles, microorganisms and dissolved minerals and organics; (iii) ultra-filtration, which removes bacteria, viruses and other ultrafine impurities from water using a membrane similar in design to an RO membrane; (iv) deionization, which is an ion exchange platform that requires resin regeneration (see “Resin Regeneration” below); and (v) electro-deionization, which is a form of deionization that is based on the conductance of electrical charges. We have significant expertise in packaging these technologies to meet specific requirements of customers requiring high purity water that is free of biological contamination.

 

Our fiscal 2007 acquisition of GE Water’s dialysis business established us as the market leader in the supply of United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) 510(k)(1) cleared water purification systems to the dialysis industry worldwide. During fiscal 2009 over 60% of our sales in this segment were derived from sales and service to U.S. dialysis clinics.

 

Water Purification Equipment

 

Our product line of water purification systems has been designed to produce biologically pure water targeted for use in the healthcare, life sciences, food and beverage, and commercial industrial markets. We have significant expertise in the design and manufacture of water treatment systems engineered to meet specific water requirements of the healthcare, life sciences and beverage industries. Such expertise includes water for hemodialysis and all grades of US Pharmacopeia (USP) water (i.e., water meeting the FDA enforced standards of the United States Pharmacopeia) including “USP Purified Water” which is an FDA requirement for the labeling of “purified” bottled water. We also package these same technologies and expertise in industrial designs to meet the requirements for high purity water in the commercial industrial markets such as boiler feedwater production or high quality rinsewater production.

 


(1) Most medical devices sold by the Company require the submission of a Premarket Notification 510(k) to the FDA and clearance of the submission by the FDA prior to commercial distribution.

 

4



 

Our Biolab equipment line includes systems that utilize either chemical or heat disinfection to sanitize the equipment. Our HX product line, introduced in 2007, provides total heat disinfection of the entire water purification system and water distribution loop. Heat disinfection is especially attractive to the life science marketplace, which requires the highest levels of biological purity. Heat sanitization is environmentally friendly and prevents the formation of dangerous biofilms. Heat disinfection has been used in the pharmaceutical industry for years and has been recently introduced in the dialysis market.

 

The Biolab equipment line of reverse osmosis (RO) machines includes various designs and sizes to meet our customers’ specific requirements. Our standard line of equipment includes the 2200, 3300, 4400, 8400, RODI® combination RO and electro-deionization system, and various heat disinfecting configurations. These product lines are now complemented by the product lines acquired with the GE medical business including the 23G, Zyzatech™ V and Z series, and the Millenium™, the leading medical portable reverse osmosis unit. The combined businesses have a wide product offering that can be configured to serve all of our target markets.

 

We also offer pretreatment equipment, lab water equipment, a full range of service deionization tanks and specific equipment designed to support the life sciences and industrial markets including peripheral equipment such as carts, bicarbonate and acid delivery systems with central and single mix distribution units, and concentrate systems with central concentrate holding tanks.

 

Our systems meet water quality and good manufacturing practice standards of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (“AAMI”). We have received 510(k) clearances from the FDA for our Biolab purification equipment and the acquired GE product lines for healthcare applications, our dialysis water purification systems and bicarbonate mix and distribution systems.

 

Service & Maintenance; Resin Regeneration

 

We provide service and maintenance for water purification systems in the United States and Canada through eighteen regional offices (sixteen in the United States and two in Canada). These service centers are staffed with sales and service personnel to support both scheduled and emergency customer requirements. Each office provides 24-hour emergency service for our customers through a fleet of stocked service vehicles. Six of the offices (Toronto, Montreal, Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago and Atlanta) are equipped with resin regeneration plants (described below).

 

Resin regeneration (also known as service deionization and carbon exchange) is the process in which cylinders (pressure vessels with an inlet connection and an outlet connection) are assembled, sanitized, and filled with ion exchange resin, which is processed using hydrochloric acid and caustic soda. These cylinders are connected to a customer’s water supply. As the water passes through the ion exchange resin beads, minerals are removed. When the electrical charge placed on the resin beads during the regeneration process is exhausted, the cylinders are exchanged for identical cylinders with regenerated resin. The cylinders with exhausted resin are returned by service personnel to our regeneration plants and the resin is regenerated for use by the same or another customer. Customers are invoiced for each cylinder replacement.

 

Filtration

 

We offer a full line of filters utilizing hollow fiber membrane technology. The filters, sold under the FiberFlo® Capsule Filters and FiberFlo Cartridge Filters names, are utilized to remove impurities from liquid streams for a wide range of applications. Such applications include the filtering of ultrapure water to remove bacteria and endotoxins in medical environments to provide protection for patients undergoing treatments that use ultrapure water. Our cartridge filters are validated to remove endotoxins in dialysis water, which is included in our registration of the filters as Medical Devices under FDA 510(k) regulations. The filters are also used in medical device reprocessing systems to help meet reprocessing water quality guidelines outlined by the AAMI. In industrial applications, the filters are used to protect systems from contamination from particulates and microorganisms.

 

Our FiberFlo filters are also being used in a variety of industries including pharmaceutical manufacturing, food and beverage processing, cosmetic manufacturing and electronics manufacturing. The filters are being used increasingly for the removal of bacteria, pyrogens and other contaminants from aqueous solutions. These filters are engineered for point-of-use applications that require very fine filtration. Their hollow fiber design provides a surface area that is up to four times larger than traditional pleated filters that are used in the same markets. The large surface area provides greater capacity and longer filter life for the customer. FiberFlo Capsule Filters and Cartridge Filters are available in a variety of styles, sizes and configurations to meet a comprehensive range of customer needs and applications.

 

5



 

Other products include microfiber and flat sheet membrane prefiltration products designed to protect the FiberFlo filter products and prolong their life in their intended applications.

 

FiberFlo filter products are sold directly and through various third-party distributors in the United States, Puerto Rico, Canada and other international markets.

 

Sterilants

 

Minncare® Cold Sterilant is a liquid sterilant product used to sanitize and disinfect high-purity water systems. Minncare Cold Sterilant is based on our proprietary peracetic acid sterilant technology, and is engineered to clean and disinfect RO membranes and associated water distribution systems. Minncare Cold Sterilant is widely used in the dialysis, medical, pharmaceutical and other industries to disinfect ultrapure water systems as part of overall procedures to control the contamination of systems by microorganisms and spores. Actril® Cold Sterilant is a ready-to-use formulation of our proprietary peracetic acid based sterilant technology. It is used for surface disinfection in a variety of industries, including the medical and pharmaceutical industries. We also have private label agreements for both Minncare and Actril sterilants with companies in the infection control industry.

 

Healthcare Disposables

 

We are a leading manufacturer and reseller of single-use, infection control products used principally in the dental office market. We offer a broad selection of core disposable dental products, comprising over 60 categories of dental merchandise, including face masks, towels and bibs, tray covers, saliva ejectors and evacuators, germicidal wipes, plastic cups, sterilization pouches, surface barriers, eyewear, disinfectants and cleaners, hand care products, gloves, prophy angles, cotton products, needles and syringes, scalpels and blades, prophy pastes, and fluoride foams and gels. We believe that we maintain a leading market position in the United States for face masks, towels and bibs, tray covers, saliva ejectors, germicidal wipes, sterilization pouches and plastic cups used in the dental market. Part of our strategy is to continue developing, licensing and/or acquiring branded products with a differentiated feature set, ideally patent protected.

 

During fiscal 2009, we focused on the development of a face mask treated with BIOSAFE® antimicrobial, a patented chemistry licensed from a third party. By the end of October 2009, we expect to launch these face masks in specific markets outside the United States. The face masks treated with BIOSAFE antimicrobial begin to reduce microorganisms such as Influenza A, MRSA, VRE, and Staph immediately upon contact. They further enhance the functionality of the mask in three ways: (1) actually killing the harmful microorganisms, (2) reducing the cross-contamination risk from touching the mask itself, and (3) creating a safer environment upon disposal of the mask. The BIOSAFE treatment chemically binds to the outer mask surface creating a long-lasting shield against microbial contamination. Because it mechanically kills the cell, it will not cause development of more resistant ‘superbugs.’ Within the United States, the sale of face masks treated with BIOSAFE antimicrobial for medical applications is subject to a 510(k) clearance by the FDA. At this time the Company is awaiting publication of the latest revision of the FDA Guidance Document pertaining to antimicrobial treatments of medical devices prior to the filing of its application.  However, the Company will continue discussions and will be submitting an application with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency covering the sale of treated face masks in the United States for non-medical applications.

 

Other noteworthy technology innovations to our product line, introduced during fiscal 2008, are Sure-Check™ Sterilization Pouches and Comfort Plus® Saliva Ejectors. The Sure-Check Sterilization Pouches are self-sealing pouches with a patented, multi-perameter printed ink both inside and outside of the pouch. This multi-parameter sterilization indicator provides the user with a reliable signal that sterilization was properly achieved without having to insert a separate measurement device into the pouch itself. The printed indicator on the pouch uniquely provides confirmation when all three key sterilization parameters, time, temperature and presence of steam, have been achieved. The Comfort Plus Saliva Ejector uses a patented design featuring rounded edges, smooth surfaces and strategically placed suction ports that help to enhance patient comfort while protecting delicate mucosal tissue.

 

We believe that the increasing concern over the outbreak of the novel H1N1 flu has significantly increased awareness of the prevention and control of infectious diseases. We believe that we are well qualified to address the global need for face masks, disinfectants and other products relating to infection prevention and control, including flu preparedness. The outbreak and spread of the novel H1N1 flu in the United States resulted in significantly increased sales of our face masks during our fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. Our increased production and sale of face masks due to the novel H1N1 flu is continuing at the present time and we are in the process of expanding our manufacturing capability.

 

6



 

We manufacture products accounting for approximately two-thirds of our net sales in this segment. We source the balance of our products from third-party suppliers and contract manufacturers, certain of which are sold under exclusive distributorship agreements. Overall, approximately 90% of our net sales in this segment relate to products manufactured in the United States. The majority of our healthcare disposable products are sold under the Crosstex® brand name. For certain of our customers, we also produce private label products.

 

Our healthcare disposable products are sold to approximately 350 wholesale customers in over 90 countries, comprising a significant number of ship-to locations in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in Europe, Japan and elsewhere. The wholesalers generally include major healthcare distributors, group purchasing organizations and co-operatives that sell our products to dental practices as well as medical, veterinary and educational institutions.

 

Dialysis

 

General

 

We design, develop, manufacture and sell reprocessing systems and sterilants for dialyzers (a device serving as an artificial kidney), as well as dialysate concentrates and supplies utilized for renal dialysis. Our products are sold in the United States and, to a significantly lesser extent, throughout the world. Our customer base is comprised of large and small dialysis chains as well as independent dialysis clinics. We sell the products in the United States primarily through our own direct distribution network, and in many international markets either directly or under various third-party distribution agreements.

 

Dialyzer Reprocessing Products and Services

 

During dialysis, a dialyzer is used to filter fluids and wastes from a dialysis patient’s blood. Our dialyzer reprocessing products are limited to use by centers that choose to clean, disinfect and reuse dialyzers, known as “dialyzer reuse,” rather than discard the dialyzers after a single-use. Our products meet rigorous sterility assurance standards and regulations, thereby providing for the safe and effective reuse of dialyzers used in dialysis clinics.

 

Dialysis centers in the United States that reuse dialyzers derive an economic benefit since the per-procedure cost is less when utilizing the dialyzer multiple times for the same patient rather than the wasteful and less environmentally friendly practice of using a dialyzer only one time. Dialysis clinics generally receive a capitated payment for providing hemodialysis treatment. Additionally, dialyzer reuse significantly reduces the negative environmental consequences of single-use dialyzers by dramatically decreasing the amount of bio-hazardous medical waste in landfills. Although public information is not available to accurately quantify the number of dialysis centers currently employing dialyzer reuse versus single-use, it is apparent that, despite the cost effectiveness and environmental advantages of dialyzer reuse, there has been a significant market shift to single-use dialyzers over the past six years.

 

Today, we believe that approximately one-third of all dialysis procedures in the United States reuse dialyzers. The shift from reusable to single-use dialyzers is principally due to the ease of using a dialyzer one time and the commitment of Fresenius Medical Care (“Fresenius”), the largest dialysis provider chain in the United States and a manufacturer of single-use dialyzers, to convert all of its dialysis clinics performing reuse (including newly acquired clinics) to single-use facilities.

 

Sales to our principal dialysis customer, DaVita, Inc. (“DaVita”), the second largest dialysis chain in the United States and a proponent of reuse, have increased during fiscal 2009. However, a continued decrease in dialyzer reuse in the United States in favor of single-use dialyzers would have an adverse effect on our business. See “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

Our dialyzer reprocessing products include the Renatron® II Automated Dialyzer Reprocessing System (“Renatron System”), the Renalog® RM Data Management System and Renalin® Cold 100 Sterilant, a peracetic acid based sterilant.

 

The Renatron System provides an automated method of rinsing, cleaning, sterilizing and testing dialyzers for reuse. The Renatron System includes a bar-code reader, a computer and the Renalog RM Data Management System, a software accessory that provides dialysis centers with automated record keeping and data analysis capabilities. We believe our Renatron Systems are faster, easier to use and more efficient than competitive automated systems. We also believe that the Renatron Systems are the top selling automated dialyzer reprocessing systems in the world.

 

Our Renalin 100 sterilant is a proprietary peracetic acid-based formula that, when used with our Renatron System, effectively cleans, disinfects and sterilizes dialyzers without the hazardous fumes and potential disposal issues related to

 

7



 

glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde reprocessing solutions. Renalin cold sterilant is the leading dialyzer reprocessing solution in the United States.

 

We also manufacture a comprehensive product line of test strips to measure concentration levels of the peracetic acid chemistries we produce. These test strips ensure that the appropriate concentration of sterilant is maintained throughout the required contact period, in addition to verifying that all sterilant has been removed from the dialyzer prior to patient use. We also sell a variety of dialysis supplies manufactured by third parties.

 

Our Dialysis segment offers various preventative maintenance programs and repair services to support the effective operation of reprocessing systems over their lifetime. Our field service personnel, dialysis center technicians and international third-party distributors install, maintain, upgrade, repair and troubleshoot equipment.

 

Dialysate Concentrates

 

Our renal dialysis treatment products include a line of acid and bicarbonate concentrates, referred to as dialysate concentrates, used by kidney dialysis centers to prepare dialysate, a chemical solution that draws waste products from the patient’s blood through a dialyzer membrane during the hemodialysis treatment. Dialysate concentrates are used in the dialysis process, whether single-use or reuse dialyzers are being utilized. These concentrates are freight sensitive and due to the competitive landscape carry overall lower gross margins in our product portfolio.

 

Endoscope Reprocessing

 

General

 

We design, develop, manufacture and sell endoscope reprocessing systems, sterilants and related supplies. Although endoscopes generally can be manually disinfected, there are many problems associated with such methods including the lack of uniform disinfection procedures, personnel exposure to disinfectant fumes and incomplete rinsing that could result in disinfectant residue remaining in or on the endoscope. We believe our endoscope reprocessing equipment offers several advantages over manual immersion in disinfectants. Our products, which meet rigorous high-level disinfection assurance standards and regulations, allow the safe and effective use of endoscopes in healthcare facilities throughout the world.

 

Our automated endoscope reprocessing equipment is designed to pre-rinse the device, then continuously pump disinfectant around the endoscope and through all of its internal working channels, resulting in thorough and consistent high- level disinfection. After the disinfection phase, all internal channels and external surfaces are thoroughly rinsed to completely remove any disinfectant residue. This automated process inhibits the buildup of biofilms in the working channels and renders the endoscope safe for the next patient use. In addition, the entire high-level disinfection process can be completed with minimal participation by the operator, freeing the operator for other tasks, reducing the exposure of personnel to the chemicals used in the disinfection process and reducing the risk of transmission of infectious diseases. Our reprocessing equipment also reduces the risks associated with inconsistent manual disinfecting.

 

Endoscope Reprocessing Products and Services

 

Our Medivators® product portfolio represents the most comprehensive offerings of capital equipment, chemistries, consumables and services that are used to pre-clean, leak test, clean and disinfect flexible endoscopes from the point of removal from a patient through to utilization in the next patient procedure.

 

Our Medivators line of endoscope reprocessing systems includes several automated systems, such as the Advantage®, Advantage Plus and DSD-201 systems, which are microprocessor-controlled, dual-basin, asynchronous endoscope disinfection systems, and the SSD-102, which is a single-basin version of the DSD-201 system. Our Advantage and Advantage Plus endoscope reprocessing systems represent technologically advanced automated systems designed to be compliant with all North American and European standards and to compete against the other sophisticated systems currently available both in Europe and North America. We commenced sales of the Advantage platform in Europe in 2004, and in North America in August 2007 following FDA clearance. All of the automated disinfection machines can be used on a broad variety of endoscopes and are programmable by the user. The dual-basin systems can disinfect up to four endoscopes at a time. Recently, the FDA and Health Canada have cleared our newest single—use chemistry reprocessor, the Advantage Plus System. This new reprocessor was cleared for use exclusively with our new single-use chemistry, Rapicide® PA, a peracetic acid based, high-level disinfectant with a five-minute contact time used at 30°C giving it superior material compatibility.

 

8



 

Medivators also recently received clearance from Health Canada to market the newly developed DSD-Edge, a single-use chemistry version of the DSD-201. The DSD-Edge is CE(2) marked for sale in European and Asian markets. We also have clearance to sell the DSD Edge in Australia. FDA clearance to market in the U.S. is pending. We also manufacture the Medivators CER series of countertop semi-automated endoscope reprocessors. These products are more compact, less expensive single and dual endoscope disinfection units.

 

Our Medivators equipment product line also includes a state-of-the-art endoscope leak detection device that provides customers with superior accuracy, complete automation, and comprehensive electronic record keeping, and the Scope Buddy® Endoscope Flushing Aid, a machine that minimizes the risk of worker repetitive motion injury associated with manual cleaning of endoscopes, while increasing the consistency of cleaning results through standardization of the pre-cleaning process.

 

In connection with our endoscope reprocessing business, we manufacture Rapicide glutaraldehyde-based high-level disinfectant and sterilant, which has FDA 510(k) clearance for a high-level disinfection claim of five minutes at 35 degrees Celsius. This disinfection contact time is currently one of the fastest available of any high-level disinfectant product sold in the United States. Rapicide has superior rinsibility which gives us a competitive market advantage. We also sell Adaspor® peracetic-acid based high-level disinfectant, manufactured by a third party in Europe, for the European and Asian markets that can be utilized in a wide variety of automated endoscope reprocessing systems. As stated above, we now also have clearances to market our new single-use chemistry Rapicide PA.

 

Our product offerings also include Intercept® Detergent and Wipes which are formulated especially for the cleaning and removal of biological and organic soils from medical device surfaces, including flexible endoscopes. When used regularly, Intercept and Intercept Wipes progressively remove built up layers of biofilm from endoscope channels and exterior surfaces. Biofilms are an acknowledged concern in health care as potential sources of nosocomial infection agents (environmentally sourced microorganisms that can be transmitted to patients during procedures or treatment).

 

Our Endoscope Reprocessing segment offers various preventative maintenance programs, repair services and user training programs to support the effective operation of reprocessing systems over their lifetime. Medivators field service personnel and international third-party distributors install, maintain, upgrade, repair and troubleshoot equipment.

 

Marketing and Sales

 

We sell and service our endoscope reprocessing equipment, high-level disinfectants, cleaners and consumables through our own United States field sales and service organization. Outside of the United States, we sell primarily through independent distribution partners in Europe, Canada, Asia, Australia and Latin America as well as our own Netherlands sales and service organization.

 

All Other

 

We also operate other businesses, including the Specialty Packaging operating segment, which includes specialty packaging products and compliance training services for the transport of infectious and biological specimens, and the Therapeutic Filtration operating segment, which includes hemofilters, hemoconcentrators and other hollow fiber filters manufactured and sold for medical applications. Due to the relatively small size of these businesses, they are combined in the All Other reporting segment.

 

Specialty Packaging

 

We provide specialty packaging and thermal control products for the transport of infectious and biological specimens as well as thermally sensitive pharmaceutical and medical products. Additionally, we provide compliance training services for the safe and proper transport of infectious and biological specimens, as defined by various international and national regulatory organizations.

 

We believe that the increasing concern over the potential spread of infectious agents, such as H1N1 flu, avian flu, E. coli and mad cow disease, as well as potential acts of bio-terrorism using agents such as anthrax, have significantly increased

 


(2) The CE marking (an acronym for the French “Conformite Europeenne”) certifies that a product has met European Union (EU) health, safety, and environmental requirements.  Many of our medical devices must meet CE marking requirements prior to commercial sale in Europe.

 

9



 

awareness of the proper shipping of diagnostic substances such as blood and tissues. We believe that we are particularly well qualified to meet the global need for compliant, secure, cost-effective packaging solutions for the shipping of infectious and biological specimens.

 

Throughout fiscal 2009, we continued the development, production and sales of the Saf-T-Temp® brand line of phase change materials (PCM) using licensed proprietary thermal technology for temperature-controlled shipments. These phase change materials help maintain thermally sensitive specimens and products, such as vaccines, pharmaceuticals and diagnostic reagents, within a discrete temperature range during shipment. The discipline of “Cold Chain Management” continues to grow as manufacturers of thermally sensitive pharmaceuticals and medical products, as well as clinical laboratories, search for more efficient and cost-effective methods to ensure the viability of their products and/or specimens in accordance with quality control standards.

 

In addition, to meet regulatory requirements that require shippers of infectious and biological substances to be trained and certified at least every two years or as often as regulations change, we offer a variety of training options allowing the customer to choose the method that best meets its needs. We provide open enrollment symposium-style training seminars in various cities, private seminar training at customers’ on-site locations, as well as self-paced internet, CD and network software.

 

Our customer base consists of medical research companies, diagnostic, clinical and university laboratories, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, United States and Canadian government agencies, hospitals and state public health departments. Our packaging, thermal and training products are distributed worldwide both directly and through third-party distributors.

 

Therapeutic Filtration

 

Our therapeutic filtration products are extracorporeal filters utilizing our proprietary hollow fiber technology. These filters include hemoconcentrators, hemofilters and specialty filters utilized for therapeutic medical applications.

 

We manufacture, market and sell a comprehensive line of hemoconcentrators. A hemoconcentrator is a device used by a perfusionist (a health care professional who operates heart-lung bypass equipment) to concentrate red blood cells and remove excess fluid from the bloodstream during open-heart surgery. Because the entire blood volume of the patient passes through the hemoconcentrator during an open-heart procedure, the biocompatibility of the blood-contact components of the device is critical.

 

Our hemoconcentrators are designed to meet the clinical requirements of neonatal through adult patients. Our principal products are the Hemocor HPH® hemoconcentrators, which contain our proprietary polysulfone hollow fiber and also feature a unique “no-rinse” design that allows it to be quickly and efficiently inserted into the bypass circuit at any time during an open-heart procedure.

 

We also manufacture, market and sell a line of Renaflo® II hemofilters. A hemofilter is a device that performs hemofiltration in a slow, continuous blood filtration therapy used to control fluid overload and acute renal failure in unstable, critically ill patients who cannot tolerate the rapid filtration rates of conventional hemodialysis. The hemofilter removes water, waste products and toxins from the circulating blood of patients while conserving the cellular and protein content of the patient’s blood. Our hemofilter line features no-rinse, polysulfone hollow fiber filters that requires minimal set-up time for healthcare professionals. The hemofilter is available in six different models to meet the clinical needs of neonatal through adult patients.

 

Our proprietary hollow fiber membranes and therapeutic products are sold to biotechnology manufacturers that integrate the filters into their own proprietary systems and through third-party distributors. Historically, one of our most successful specialty filters has been sold on a private label basis to a manufacturer of a respiratory therapy device that incorporates our filter in their product, particularly for pediatric applications.

 

Government Regulation

 

Many of our products are subject to regulation by the FDA, which regulates the testing, manufacturing, packaging, distribution and marketing of our medical devices and water purification devices in the United States. Delays in FDA review can significantly delay new product introduction and may result in a product becoming “dated” or losing its market opportunity before it can be introduced. Certain of our products may also be regulated by other governmental or private

 

10



 

agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency, Underwriters Lab, Inc. (“UL”), and comparable agencies in certain foreign countries. The FDA and other agency clearances generally are required before we can market such new or significantly changed existing products in the United States or internationally. The FDA and certain other international governmental agencies also have the authority to require a recall or modification of products in the event of a defect.

 

The Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938 and Safe Medical Device Act of 1990 require compliance with specific manufacturing and quality assurance standards for certain of our products. The regulations also require manufacturers to establish a quality assurance program to monitor the design and manufacturing process and maintain records that show compliance with FDA regulations and the manufacturer’s written specifications and procedures relating to its medical devices. The FDA inspects medical device manufacturers for compliance with the current Quality Systems Regulations (“QSR’s”). Manufacturers that fail to meet the QSR’s may be issued reports or citations for non-compliance.

 

In addition, many of our infection prevention and control products sold in Canada, Europe and Japan are subject to comparable regulations and requirements as those described above. International regulatory bodies often establish varying regulations governing product standards, packaging requirements, labeling requirements, import restrictions, tariff regulations, duties and tax requirements. For example, as a result of our sales in Europe, we were required to be certified as having a Quality System that meets the ISO 13485-2003 standard.

 

Many of our products must also meet the requirements of the European Medical Device Directive (“MDD”) for their sale into the European Union. This certification allows us, upon completion of a comprehensive technical file, to affix the CE mark to our products and to freely distribute such products throughout the European Union. Failure to maintain CE mark certification could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Our endoscope and dialyzer reprocessing products, as well as our Canadian water purification equipment manufacturing facility and many of our products manufactured in Canada, are subject to regulation by Health Canada — Therapeutic Products Directorate (“TPD”), which regulates the distribution and marketing of medical devices in Canada. Certain of such products may be regulated by other governmental or private agencies, including Canadian Standards Agency (“CSA”). TPD and other agency clearances generally are required before we can market new medical products in Canada. The Health Products and Food Branch Inspectorate (“HPFBI”) governs problem reporting, modification and recalls. HPFBI also has the authority to require a recall or modification in the event of defect. In order to market our medical products in Canada, we are required to hold a Medical Device Establishment License, as well as certain medical device licenses by product, as provided by HPFBI.

 

Certain of our specialty packaging products have been independently tested by a third-party laboratory and certified by Transport Canada. These certified packaging products as well as our other specialty packaging products have been designed to meet all applicable national and international standards for the safe transport of infectious and biological substances. Such standards include those issued by Canadian General Standards Board, Transport of Dangerous Goods Regulations Canada, International Civil Aviation Organization, International Air Transport Association, and the United States Code of Federal Regulations Title 49.

 

Federal, state and foreign regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of our products are subject to change. We cannot predict what impact, if any, such changes might have on our business.

 

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials

 

We purchase raw materials, sub-assemblies, components and other supplies essential to our operations from numerous suppliers in the United States and abroad. The principal raw materials that we use to conduct operations include chemicals, paper pulp, resin, stainless steel and plastic components. These raw materials are obtainable from several sources and are generally available within the lead times specified to vendors.

 

From time to time we experience price increases for raw materials, with no guarantee that such increases can be passed along to our customers. For example, during fiscal 2008 we experienced unprecedented price increases in certain raw materials, including chemicals, paper pulp and plastics (resins and bottles). In addition, we experienced significant difficulty in obtaining certain chemicals in fiscal 2008 due to apparent shortages by certain suppliers. Although prices of raw materials have decreased and we do not currently foresee extraordinary difficulty in obtaining the materials, sub-assemblies, components, or other supplies necessary for our business operations, we cannot predict if similar difficulties as those experienced in fiscal 2008 will occur in the future that may adversely affect our business.

 

11



 

Intellectual Property

 

We protect our technology and products by, among other means, filing United States and foreign patent applications. There can be no assurance, however, that any patent will provide adequate protection for the technology, system, product, service or process it covers. In addition, the process of obtaining and protecting patents can be long and expensive. We also rely upon trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our proprietary position.

 

As of September 18, 2009, we held 50 United States patents and 43 foreign patents, and had 10 United States patents and 30 foreign patents pending. The majority of our United States and foreign patents, for individual products, are effective for twenty years from the filing date. The actual protection afforded by a patent, which can vary from country to country, depends upon the type of patent, the scope of its coverage and the availability of legal remedies in the country. We believe that the patents in each of our segments are important. In addition, we license from independent third parties under certain patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property, the right to manufacture and sell our Rapicide disinfectant and sterilant (see “—Reporting Segments-Endoscope Reprocessing”), our phase change material products (see “—Reporting Segments-All Other-Specialty Packaging”) and products utilizing BIOSAFE antimicrobial (see “—Reporting Segments-Healthcare Disposables”). These licenses, each of which are long-term, are critical to our commercialization of those products.

 

Our products and services are sold around the world under various trade names, trademarks and brand names. We consider our trade names, trademarks and brand names to be valuable in the marketing of our products in each segment. As of September 18, 2009, we had a total of 390 trademark registrations in the United States and in various foreign countries in which we conduct business, as well as 66 trademark applications pending worldwide.

 

Seasonality

 

Our businesses generally are not seasonal in nature.

 

Principal Customers

 

None of our customers accounted for 10% or more of our consolidated net sales from continuing operations during fiscal 2009. However, Fresenius and DaVita each accounted for approximately 8% of our consolidated net sales.

 

Except as described below, none of our segments are reliant upon a single customer, or a few customers, the loss of any one or more of which could have a material adverse effect on the segment.

 

In our Water Purification and Filtration segment, one customer, Fresenius, accounted for approximately 25% of our segment net sales. The loss of a significant amount of business from this customer could have a material adverse effect on our Water Purification and Filtration segment.

 

Our Healthcare Disposables segment is reliant on four customers who collectively accounted for approximately 55% of our Healthcare Disposables segment net sales and 14% of our consolidated net sales from continuing operations during fiscal 2009. Henry Schein accounted for approximately 22% of our segment net sales. The loss of a significant amount of business from any of these four customers or a further consolidation of such customers could have a material adverse effect on our Healthcare Disposables segment.

 

During fiscal 2009, three of our customers collectively accounted for approximately 50% of the Dialysis segment net sales including DaVita, which accounted for approximately 30% of this segment’s net sales. The loss of a significant amount of business from any of these three customers could have a material adverse effect on our Dialysis segment.

 

Backlog

 

On September 18, 2009, our consolidated backlog was approximately $14,954,000 compared with approximately $13,147,000 on September 19, 2008. All of the backlog is expected to be recognized as revenue within one year of such date.

 

12



 

Competition

 

General

 

The markets in which our business is conducted are highly competitive. Competition is intense in all of our business segments and includes many large and small competitors. Important competitive factors generally include product design and quality, safety, ease of use, product service and price. We believe that the long-term competitive position for all of our segments depends principally on our success in developing, manufacturing and marketing innovative, cost-effective products and services.

 

Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical and human resources than us, are well-established with reputations for success in the sale and service of their products and may have certain other competitive advantages over us. However, we believe that the worldwide reputation for the quality and innovation of our products among customers and our reputation for providing quality product service give us a competitive advantage with respect to many of our products.

 

In addition, certain companies have developed or may be expected to develop new technologies or products that directly or indirectly compete with our products. We anticipate that we may face increased competition in the future as new infection prevention and control products and services enter the market. Numerous organizations are believed to be working with a variety of technologies and sterilizing agents. In addition, a number of companies have developed or are developing disposable medical instruments and other devices designed to address the risks of infection and contamination. There can be no assurance that new products or services developed by our competitors will not be more commercially successful than those provided or developed by us in the future.

 

Segments

 

Information with respect to competition within our most significant individual segments is as follows:

 

The Water Purification and Filtration segment has been experiencing increased competition due to a consolidation of suppliers during the past few years. This consolidation has resulted principally from the acquisition by large industrial manufacturers of many of the leading manufacturers of water purification equipment and filtration products. The resulting entities such as GE Water & Process Technologies and Siemens Water Technologies, which are the market leaders in this industry, are significantly larger and have greater financial and other resources available than the smaller companies in the industry such as our Mar Cor Purification business. It remains difficult to assess the long term impact of such consolidation on our business and to project such impact in the future. In addition, this segment has experienced increased pricing pressures in its resin regeneration business. We believe that our ability to successfully compete in the water purification, filtration and disinfectant market derives from our expertise in an FDA regulated environment, our broad product offerings especially after our acquisition of the dialysis water business from GE Water and the high value and quality of our products and services. We believe that by focusing our efforts principally on the dialysis, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical and commercial industrial markets, providing a high level of customer service and making selective acquisitions, we can continue to grow this segment, despite the continued industry consolidation and pricing pressures.

 

In our Healthcare Disposables segment, our principal competitors vary by product type, but principally encompass bigger companies that serve larger, non-dental channels such as hospitals and physician offices. Such competitors include Kimberly-Clark, 3M ESPE, Danaher/Sybron, Dentsply/Sultan Healthcare, Alcan, Tidi Products and more generically less expensive imported products from Asia. We believe that our long-standing brand reputation in dentistry, product quality, superior customer service and breadth of product line are competitive advantages and are the basis for our success in this segment.

 

In our Dialysis segment, our most significant competition comes from manufacturers of single-use dialyzers, particularly Fresenius, the largest dialysis chain in the United States and a manufacturer of single-use dialyzers. In connection with its acquisition of Renal Care Group in March 2006, Fresenius has converted substantially all of its dialysis clinics (including newly acquired clinics) to single-use, which has adversely affected sales of our dialysis products and reprocessing equipment. See “—Reporting Segments—Dialysis,” “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

13



 

In our Endoscope Reprocessing segment, our principal competitors are Steris, Custom Ultrasonics, Olympus, ASP division of Johnson & Johnson, Metrex, Ruhoff and Ecolab. During the past two years, ASP and Steris introduced new model endoscope reprocessors that directly compete with our reprocessors and may adversely impact our ability to maintain our current market share.

 

Research and Development

 

Research and development expenses (which include continuing engineering costs) were $4,632,000 and $4,010,000 in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively. The majority of our research and development expenses related to our MDS endoscope reprocessor, specialty filtration products and water purification systems.

 

Environmental Matters

 

We anticipate that our compliance with federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, will not have any material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

Employees

 

As of September 18, 2009, we employed 874 persons of whom 762 are located in the United States, 79 are located in Canada, 15 are located in Europe, Africa and the Middle East, and 18 are located in the Far East. None of our employees are represented by labor unions. We consider our relations with our employees to be satisfactory.

 

Financial Information about Geographic Areas

 

We have operations in Canada, Europe, Asia and other areas outside of the United States. These operations involve the same business segments as our domestic operations. For a geographic presentation of revenues and other financial data for the three years ended July 31, 2009, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Our foreign operations are subject, in varying degrees, to a number of inherent risks. These risks include, among other things, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, exchange controls and currency restrictions, changes in local economic conditions and tax regulations, unsettled political, regulatory or business conditions, and government-sponsored boycotts and tariffs on the Company’s products or services.

 

Depending on the direction of change relative to the U.S. dollar, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations can increase or reduce the reported dollar amounts of the Company’s net assets and results of operations. Overall, net income during fiscal 2009 was favorably impacted as a result of foreign currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar. See “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” We cannot predict future changes in foreign currency exchange rates or the effect they will have on our operations.

 

Available Information

 

We make available to the public, free of charge, on or through the Investor Relations section of our internet website, copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materials with the SEC. Our filings are available to the public from commercial document retrieval services, our website and at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Our website address is www.cantelmedical.com. Also available on our website are our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Charters of the Nominating and Governance Committee, Compensation Committee and Audit Committee, and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Report.

 

Item 1A.                 RISK FACTORS.

 

We are subject to various risks and uncertainties relating to or arising out of the nature of our businesses and general business, economic, financing, legal and other factors or conditions that may affect us. We provide the following cautionary discussion of risks and uncertainties relevant to our businesses, which we believe are factors that, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material and adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition, or could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected or historical results. We note these factors for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should understand that it is not possible to predict or

 

14



 

identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not consider the following to be a complete discussion of all potential risks or uncertainties.

 

Our market for dialysis reprocessing products is limited to dialysis centers that reuse dialyzers, which market has been decreasing in the United States.

 

Our dialyzer reprocessing products are limited to use by centers that choose to clean, sterilize and reuse dialyzers, rather than discard the dialyzers after a single use. Dialysis centers in the United States that reuse dialyzers derive an economic benefit since the per-procedure cost is less when utilizing dialyzer reuse compared with single-use and such dialysis clinics generally receive a capitated payment for providing hemodialysis treatment. Although current public information is not available to accurately quantify the number of dialysis centers currently employing dialyzer reuse versus single-use, it is apparent that the market share of single-use dialyzers has been increasing during the past six years relative to reuse dialyzers. We believe that approximately one-third of all dialysis procedures in the United States currently reuse dialyzers.

 

The shift from reuse to single-use dialyzers is due in large part to the commitment of Fresenius, the largest dialysis chain in the United States and a manufacturer of single-use dialyzers, to convert all of its reuse dialysis clinics (including newly acquired clinics) to single-use facilities. On March 31, 2006, Fresenius acquired Renal Care Group, previously a significant customer of our dialysis reuse products.

 

The Company believes that if the per procedure cost of single-use relative to reuse decreases to a level that makes it more economical to switch from reuse to single use, then all or a substantial number of our customers may elect to make such switch. The loss of any of our major customers due to such economics or any other reason would have a material adverse effect on our business. See “Business - Principal Customers,” “Business - Competition” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations.”

 

The consolidation of dialysis providers has resulted in greater buying power by certain of our customers, which over time has caused us to reduce the average selling prices of our dialysis products, thereby reducing net sales and profit margins. Such industry consolidation and the highly competitive market has also resulted in the loss of dialysate concentrate sales.

 

Since 2005, there has been an increasing consolidation in the dialysis industry, marked by the acquisition by certain major dialysis chains of other major chains, as well as small chains and independents. Such consolidation of dialysis providers has resulted in greater buying power by certain of our customers, which has caused us to reduce or maintain the average selling prices of our dialysis products, thereby reducing net sales and profit margins. In addition, the decrease in sales of low margin dialysate concentrate business continued during fiscal 2009 since Fresenius manufactures dialysate concentrate itself and therefore provides dialysate concentrate to dialysis centers that it acquired including Renal Care Group dialysis centers, our former customer. DaVita and certain international customers have also continued their reduction of dialysate concentrate purchases from us due to competitive pricing. Sales in our Dialysis segment were adversely impacted during fiscal 2009 and our fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, and will continue to be adversely impacted during fiscal 2010, due to the loss of some low margin dialysate concentrate business primarily as a result of the highly competitive and price sensitive market for such product.

 

Because a significant portion of our Water Purification and Filtration, Dialysis and Healthcare Disposables segments net sales comes from a few large customers, any significant decrease in sales to these customers, due to industry consolidation or otherwise, could harm our operating results.

 

In our Water Purification and Filtration segment, one customer, Fresenius, accounts for approximately 25% of our net sales. The loss of a significant amount of business from this customer could have a material adverse effect on our Water Purification and Filtration segment.

 

During fiscal 2009, DaVita accounted for approximately 30% of the Dialysis segment net sales. We are highly dependent on DaVita as a customer and any shift by this customer away from reuse could have a material adverse effect on our Dialysis segment net sales.

 

The distribution network in the United States dental industry is concentrated, with relatively few distributors of consumables accounting for a significant share of the sales volume to dentists. Accordingly, net sales and profitability of our Healthcare Disposables segment are highly dependent on our relationships with a limited number of large distributors. During fiscal 2009, the top four customers of our Healthcare Disposables segment accounted for approximately 55% of its net sales.

 

15



 

Further customer consolidation and concentration in this segment may occur. Although we do not anticipate that any customers of the Healthcare Disposables segment will account for more than 10% of our net sales on a consolidated basis, the loss or a significant reduction of business from any of the major customers of the Healthcare Disposables segment could adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, because our Healthcare Disposables segment products are sold through third-party distributors and not directly to end users, we may not be able to control the amount and timing of resources that our distributors devote to our products.

 

There is no assurance that there will not be a further or continued loss or reduction in business from one or more of our major customers. In addition, we cannot assure that net sales from customers that have accounted for significant net sales in the past, either individually or as a group, will reach or exceed historical levels in any future period.

 

Demand for some of our healthcare disposables products can be significantly affected by the severity of the novel H1N1 flu and the level of urgency our customers and the general public develop and maintain with respect to epidemic and pandemic preparedness.

 

Net sales of high margin face masks, disinfectants and other healthcare disposables products were strong in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 due to the outbreak of the novel H1N1 flu (swine flu). However, we cannot provide assurances that such increased sales levels can be sustained in fiscal 2010 since such demand is highly dependent upon the severity and timing of the novel H1N1 flu, the ability of our Company to educate existing customers and potential additional customers on the benefits of our face masks, disinfectants and other products and the level of urgency our customers and the general public develop and maintain with respect to epidemic and pandemic preparedness.

 

The consolidation of distributors in the dental industry could result in a reduction in our net sales due to reduced average selling prices of our healthcare disposable products and the loss of private label business.

 

In recent years, there has been an increasing consolidation of distributors that sell products in the dental industry. Such consolidation of distributors may result in greater buying power by certain of our customers, which could cause us to reduce the average selling prices of our healthcare disposable products, thereby reducing net sales and profit margins. Additionally, depending on which distributors are acquired by whom, such distributor consolidations may result in the consolidated entity no longer purchasing certain products from us such as private label products manufactured by us but associated with the acquired distributor.

 

Our businesses are adversely impacted by rising fuel and oil prices and are heavily reliant on certain raw materials.

 

We purchase raw materials, sub-assemblies, components and other supplies essential to our operations from numerous suppliers in the United States and abroad. The principal raw materials that we use to conduct operations include chemicals, paper pulp, resin, stainless steel and plastic components.

 

From time to time we experience price increases for raw materials, with no guarantee that such increases can be passed along to our customers. During fiscal 2008, we experienced unprecedented price increases in certain raw materials due in large part to the rising price of fuel and oil, including chemicals, paper pulp and plastics (resins and bottles) which had a significant adverse impact on our gross margins. In addition, we experienced significant difficulty in obtaining certain chemicals in fiscal 2008 due to apparent shortages by certain suppliers. Although prices and raw material availability normalized during fiscal 2009 and we do not currently foresee extraordinary difficulty in obtaining the materials, sub-assemblies, components or other supplies necessary for our business operations, we cannot predict if similar difficulties will occur in the future, including further price increases, that may adversely affect our business.

 

In addition, rising fuel and oil prices can also have a significant adverse impact on transportation costs related to both the purchasing and delivery of products.

 

During fiscal 2009, the cost of certain raw materials and distribution costs decreased due in large part to the decreasing price of fuel and oil. Such decreases, coupled with selling price increases, favorably impacted our gross margins in fiscal 2009. If costs increase again in the future, we may not be able to implement further price increases to our customers, which would adversely impact our gross margins.

 

16



 

The acquisition of new businesses and product lines, which has inherent risks, is an important part of our growth strategy.

 

We intend to grow, in part, by acquiring businesses. The success of this strategy depends upon several factors, including our ability to:

 

·                  identify and acquire businesses;

·                  obtain financing for acquisitions on terms that are favorable or acceptable;

·                  integrate acquired operations, personnel, products and technologies into our organization effectively;

·                  retain and motivate key personnel and retain the customers of acquired companies; and

·                  successfully promote and increase sales of acquired product lines.

 

In addition, even if acceptable financing is obtained, such financing may result in significant charges associated with the potential write-off of existing deferred financing costs.

 

On August 1, 2009, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, contingent future consideration, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The provisions of this new accounting pronouncement may make it more difficult for us to identify acquisitions that meet all of our financial strategic objectives.

 

In addition, we have occasionally used our stock as partial consideration for acquisitions. Our common stock may not remain at a price at which it can be used as consideration for acquisitions without diluting our existing stockholders, and potential acquisition candidates may not view our stock attractively. We also may not be able to sustain the rates of growth that we have experienced in the past, whether by acquiring businesses or otherwise.

 

We have a significant amount of goodwill and intangible assets on our balance sheet related to acquisitions. If future operating results of the acquired business are significantly less than the results anticipated at the time of the acquisition, we may be required to incur impairment charges. At July 31, 2009, our reporting units that are potentially at risk for impairment are Healthcare Disposables and Specialty Packaging, which had average fair values that exceeded book value by modest amounts. For all of our remaining reporting units, average fair value exceeded book value by substantial amounts.

 

Competition from manufacturing facilities located in China could result in a reduction in our net sales of healthcare disposable products due to reduced average selling prices or our customers no longer purchasing certain products from us.

 

Despite expensive shipping costs, some of our competitors manufacture certain healthcare disposable products in China due to the very low labor costs in that country. Although we believe the quality of our healthcare disposable products, which are produced in the United States, are superior, our sales in the future may be adversely affected by either loss of sales or reductions in the price of our products as a result of this low cost competition.

 

We are subject to extensive government regulation. Government regulation may delay or prevent new product introduction.

 

Many of our products are subject to regulation by governmental and private agencies in the United States and abroad, which regulate the testing, manufacturing, storage, packaging, labeling, distribution and marketing of medical supplies and devices. Certain international regulatory bodies also impose import restrictions, tariff regulations, duties and tax requirements. Delays in agency review can significantly delay new product introduction and may result in a product becoming “dated” or losing its market opportunity before it can be introduced. The FDA and other agency clearances generally are required before we can market new products in the United States or make significant changes to existing products. The FDA also has the authority to require a recall or modification of products in the event of a defect. The process of obtaining marketing clearances and approvals from regulatory agencies for new products can be time consuming and expensive. There is no assurance that clearances or approvals will be granted or that agency review will not involve delays that would adversely affect our ability to commercialize our products.

 

17



 

During the past several years, the FDA, in accordance with its standard practice, has conducted a number of inspections of our manufacturing facilities to ensure compliance with regulatory standards relating to our testing, manufacturing, storage and packaging of products. On occasion, following an inspection, the FDA has called our attention to certain “Good Manufacturing Practices” compliance deficiencies. Failure to adequately correct violations or otherwise comply with requests made by the FDA can result in regulatory action being initiated by the FDA including seizure, injunction and civil monetary penalties.

 

Federal, state and foreign regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of our products are subject to change. We cannot predict what impact, if any, such changes might have on our business. In addition, there can be no assurance that regulation of our products will not become more restrictive in the future and that any such development would not have a material adverse effect on our business. For a more detailed discussion on government regulation and related risks, see “Business - Government Regulation.”

 

Customer acceptance of our products is dependent on our ability to meet changing requirements.

 

Customer acceptance of our products is significantly dependent on our ability to offer products that meet the changing requirements of our customers, including hospitals, industrial laboratories, doctors, dentists, clinics, government agencies and industrial corporations. Any decrease in the level of customer acceptance of our products could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We distribute our products in highly competitive markets.

 

We distribute substantially all of our products in highly competitive markets that contain many products available from nationally and internationally recognized competitors. Many of these competitors have significantly greater financial, technical and human resources than us and are well-established. In addition, some companies have developed or may be expected to develop technologies or products that could compete with the products we manufacture and distribute or that would render our products obsolete or noncompetitive. In addition, our competitors may achieve patent protection, regulatory approval or product commercialization that would limit our ability to compete with them. Although we believe that we compete effectively with all of our present competitors in our principal product groups, there can be no assurance that we will continue to do so. These and other competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on our business. See “Business — Competition.”

 

Currency fluctuations and trade barriers could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

A portion of our products in all of our business segments are exported to and imported from a variety of geographic locations, and our business could be materially and adversely affected by the imposition of trade barriers, fluctuations in the rates of exchange of various currencies, tariff increases and import and export restrictions, affecting all of such geographies including but not limited to the United States, Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the Far East.

 

Our Canadian subsidiaries purchase a portion of their inventories and incur expenses in United States dollars and sell a significant amount of their products in United States dollars. Our United States subsidiaries also sell a portion of their products in euros and British pounds. Therefore, we are exposed to foreign exchange gains and losses upon settlement of such items. Similarly, our foreign subsidiaries’ United States denominated assets and liabilities must be converted into their functional currency when preparing their financial statements, which results in foreign exchange gains and losses. Additionally, the results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries are translated from their functional currency to United States dollars for purposes of preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements. Therefore, the results of our continuing operations could be materially and adversely affected by fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar, euro and British pound against the United States dollar.

 

Recent deterioration in the economy and credit markets may adversely affect our future results of operations.

 

Our business has been and may continue to be adversely affected by the recent deterioration in the general economy and credit markets by potentially causing our customers to slow spending on our products, especially capital equipment. Sales of capital equipment represented approximately 25% of our fiscal 2009 consolidated net sales and are primarily included in our Water Purification and Filtration, Dialysis and Endoscope Reprocessing segments.

 

18



 

Because we operate in international markets, we are subject to political and economic risks that we do not face in the United States.

 

We operate in a global market. Global operations are subject to risks, including political and economic instability, general economic conditions, imposition of government controls, the need to comply with a wide variety of foreign and United States export laws, trade restrictions and the greater difficulty of administering business overseas.

 

The markets for many of our products are subject to changing technology.

 

The markets for many products we sell, particularly endoscope reprocessing equipment, are subject to changing technology, new product introductions and product enhancements, and evolving industry standards. The introduction or enhancement of products embodying new technology or the emergence of new industry standards could render existing products obsolete or result in short product life cycles. Accordingly, our ability to compete is in part dependent on our ability to continually offer enhanced and improved products.

 

We may be exposed to product liability claims resulting from the use of products we sell and distribute.

 

We may be exposed to product liability claims resulting from the products we sell and distribute. We maintain general liability insurance that includes product liability coverage, which we believe is adequate for our businesses. However, there can be no assurance that insurance coverage for these risks will continue to be available or, if available, that it will be sufficient to cover potential claims or that the present level of coverage will continue to be available at a reasonable cost. A partially or completely uninsured successful claim against us could have a material adverse effect on us.

 

We use chemicals and other regulated substances in the manufacturing of our products.

 

In the ordinary course of certain of our manufacturing processes, we use various chemicals and other regulated substances. Although we are not aware of any material claims involving violation of environmental or occupational health and safety laws or regulations, there can be no assurance that such a claim may not arise in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

 

We rely on intellectual property and proprietary rights to maintain our competitive position.

 

We rely heavily on proprietary technology that we protect primarily through licensing arrangements, patents, trade secrets and proprietary know-how. There can be no assurance that any pending or future patent applications will be granted or that any current or future patents, regardless of whether we are an owner or a licensee of the patent, will not be challenged, rendered unenforceable, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights will provide a competitive advantage to us. There can also be no assurance that our trade secrets or non-disclosure agreements will provide meaningful protection of our proprietary information. There can also be no assurance that others will not independently develop similar technologies or duplicate any technology developed by us or that our technology will not infringe upon patents or other rights owned by others.

 

Modifications to our revolving credit facility will likely result in higher average interest rates in fiscal 2010.

 

The revolving portion of our credit facilities has a termination date of August 1, 2010. We are in discussions with our bank syndicate regarding modifications to such facility, including an extension of the termination date, and expect to formally modify the facility before its expiration. The margins applicable to our outstanding borrowings at July 31, 2009 were 0.00% above the lender’s base rate and 0.75% above the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). However, due to current market conditions, a modification of our credit facilities will likely result in an increase of our margins above the lender’s base rate and LIBOR, which may adversely affect our fiscal 2010 results of operations. In addition, depending upon the structure of the modification, we may be required to write-off certain deferred financing costs that are recorded in other assets and are currently being amortized over the life of the credit facilities.

 

If we are unable to retain key personnel, our business could be adversely affected.

 

Our success is dependent to a significant degree upon the efforts of key members of our management. We have previously entered into various employment agreements with executives of the Company, including our Corporate executive staff and our subsidiary presidents. The majority of such contracts have expired or will expire in early fiscal 2010. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is actively working on new agreements and has retained a third party consulting firm to provide advice on executive compensation and to assist with this process. In the interim, the Compensation Committee has agreed that in the event the employment of

 

19



 

of these executives is terminated by the Company without cause, the executive will continue to receive their base salary through July 31, 2010. However, there can be no assurance that the terms of any offered agreements will be successfully negotiated or accepted by such personnel. We believe the loss or unavailability of any of such individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, our success depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified scientific, technical, sales, marketing and other personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense and there can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain the personnel necessary for the development and operation of our businesses.

 

Our stock price has been volatile and may experience continued significant price and volume fluctuations in the future that could reduce the value of outstanding shares.

 

The market for our common stock has, from time to time, experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that may have been unrelated to our operating performance. Factors such as announcements of our quarterly financial results and new business developments could also cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly.

 

Item 1B.                 UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

 

None

 

Item 2.                    PROPERTIES.

 

Owned Facilities

 

We own three buildings located on adjacent sites, comprising a total of 16.5 acres of land in Plymouth, a suburb of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The principal facility is a 110,000 square-foot building used for executive, administrative and sales staff, research operations, manufacturing and warehousing. The second facility is a 65,000 square-foot building used for manufacturing and warehousing. The third facility is a 43,000 square-foot building used primarily for manufacturing and warehouse operations. These facilities are used for our Dialysis, Endoscope Reprocessing and Therapeutic Filtration operating segments, as well as a portion of our Water Purification and Filtration operating segment.

 

We own a 63,000 square-foot building in Hauppauge, New York, the headquarters for our Crosstex subsidiary, which is used for executive, administrative and sales staff, manufacturing and warehousing for our Healthcare Disposables operating segment.

 

As a result of the acquisition of G.E.M. on July 31, 2009, we own a 13,825 square-foot building in Buena Park, California, which serves as our west coast warehouse and regeneration plant for our Water Purification and Filtration segment.

 

20



 

Leased Facilities

 

Our principal leased facilities include the following:

 

Location

 

Purpose

 

Square Footage

 

Principal Operating
Segment

Middletown, PA

 

Warehouse and distribution hub

 

31,000

 

Dialysis

Plymouth, MN

 

Warehousing

 

44,000

 

Various

Hauppauge, NY

 

Warehousing

 

40,000

 

Healthcare Disposables

Sharon, PA (1)

 

Manufacturing and warehousing

 

52,000

 

Healthcare Disposables

Santa Fe Springs, CA

 

Manufacturing and warehousing

 

35,000

 

Healthcare Disposables

Lawrenceville, GA

 

Manufacturing and warehousing

 

40,000

 

Healthcare Disposables

Burlington, Ontario

 

Sales and administrative offices, research and engineering, manufacturing and warehousing

 

21,600

 

Water Purification and Filtration

Skippack, PA

 

Sales and administrative offices, manufacturing, warehousing and regeneration plant

 

22,500

 

Water Purification and Filtration

Heerlan, the Netherlands (2)

 

Sales and service offices, warehouse and distribution hub

 

21,000

 

Various

Lowell, MA (3)

 

Sales and administrative offices, manufacturing, warehousing and regeneration plant

 

26,000

 

Water Purification and Filtration

Edmonton, Alberta

 

Executive, sales and administrative offices, manufacturing and warehousing

 

11,700

 

Specialty Packaging (Included in All Other reporting segment)

Little Falls, NJ

 

Corporate executive offices

 

8,900

 

Cantel Medical Corp.

 


(1) The facility in Sharon was owned by an entity controlled by three of the former owners of Crosstex, two of whom currently serve as officers of Crosstex. During fiscal 2009, the entity sold the building to a third party in a transaction under which the buyer made substantial improvements, including the addition of 17,000 square-feet to the existing 35,000 square-feet, in consideration for Crosstex agreeing to enter into a new lease agreement that provides for increased rental charges.

 

(2) As part of the restructuring plan of our Netherlands subsidiary as further described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we sold our building and land in Heerlan, the Netherlands on May 19, 2009 and entered into a lease for 2.5 years with the new owner so we can continue to use the facility as our European sales and service headquarters as well as for warehouse and distribution activity. The sale of the building and land resulted in a gain of $146,000, which will be amortized over the life of the lease and is recorded in deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities. The rent for the full 2.5 year lease of $325,000 was paid from the sale proceeds and recorded as a prepaid expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

(3) The facility in Lowell is leased from a company that is affiliated with an officer of Mar Cor Purification.

 

In addition, we lease office and sales space in Tokyo, Japan; Singapore; and Beijing, China that is used for all of our operating segments other than Healthcare Disposables and Specialty Packaging. We lease office, sales and warehouse space in Lienden, the Netherlands for our Healthcare Disposables segment.

 

We lease additional space for our Water Purification and Filtration segment in Downers Grove, Illinois; Norcross, Georgia; Royal, Virginia; Florida, New York; Orion Township, Michigan; Cleveland, Ohio; Raleigh, North Carolina; Homewood, Alabama; Smyrna, Tennessee; Addison, Texas; Auburn, Washington; Lakeland, Florida; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Concord, California; Toronto, Ontario; and Montreal, Quebec. The Downers Grove, Norcross, Toronto and Montreal facilities serve as warehouses and regeneration plants, while the other locations are small storage facilities supporting local service operations.

 

We also lease additional space for our Specialty Packaging segment in Glen Burnie, Maryland that is used for sales and marketing, warehousing and as a distribution hub.

 

21



 

Net rentals for leased space for fiscal 2009 aggregated approximately $2,815,000 compared with $2,849,000 in fiscal 2008.

 

Item 3.

 

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

 

In the normal course of business, we are subject to pending and threatened legal actions. It is our policy to accrue for amounts related to these legal matters if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount of anticipated exposure can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any of these pending claims or legal actions will have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Item 4.

 

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

 

There was no submission of matters to a vote during the three months ended July 31, 2009.

 

PART II

 

Item 5.

 

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

 

Our Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “CMN.”

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices for the Common Stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange.

 

 

 

HIGH

 

LOW

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

10.75

 

$

8.18

 

Second Quarter

 

15.33

 

7.57

 

Third Quarter

 

15.44

 

11.53

 

Fourth Quarter

 

16.84

 

12.51

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

18.00

 

$

13.70

 

Second Quarter

 

19.10

 

11.27

 

Third Quarter

 

11.92

 

9.55

 

Fourth Quarter

 

13.05

 

9.14

 

 

We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock. The Board of Directors intends to periodically review its dividend policy and could change such policy at anytime. We are not permitted to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock without the consent of our lenders.

 

On September 18, 2009, the closing price of our Common Stock was $14.68 and we had 348 record holders of Common Stock. A number of such holders of record are brokers and other institutions holding shares of Common Stock in “street name” for more than one beneficial owner.

 

In May 2008, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of our outstanding Common Stock under a repurchase program commencing on June 9, 2008. Under the repurchase program we repurchased shares from time-to-time at prevailing prices and as permitted by applicable securities laws (including SEC Rule 10b-18) and New York Stock Exchange requirements. The repurchase program had a one-year term that expired on June 8, 2009.

 

The first repurchase under our repurchase program occurred on July 11, 2008. Through July 31, 2008, we completed the repurchase of 90,700 shares under the program at a total average price per share of $9.42. We repurchased an additional 43,847 shares through October 31, 2008 at a total average price per share of $9.17. No additional repurchases were made subsequent to the end of our first quarter ended October 31, 2008. Therefore, at the conclusion of the repurchase program on June 8, 2009, we had repurchased 134,547 shares under the repurchase program at a total average price per share of $9.34.

 

22



 

Stock Performance Graph

 

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our Common Stock for the last five fiscal years with the cumulative total returns on the Russell 2000 index and the Dow Jones US Health Care Equipment & Services index over the same period (assuming an investment of $100 in our common stock and in each of the indexes on July 31, 2004, and where applicable, the reinvestment of all dividends).

 

 


*$100 invested on 7/31/04 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.

Fiscal year ending July 31.

 

Copyright© 2009 Dow Jones & Co. All rights reserved.

 

23



 

Item 6.

 

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA.

 

The financial data in the following table is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the financial statements and notes thereto and other information incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K. G.E.M. was acquired on the last day of fiscal 2009 and therefore is excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Income Data for all years presented, but the net assets of G.E.M. are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet Data as of July 31, 2009. Crosstex is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income Data for fiscals 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006. GE Water and Twist are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income Data for fiscals 2009 and 2008 and the portion of fiscal 2007 subsequent to their acquisitions on March 30, 2007 and July 9, 2007, respectively. DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income Data for fiscal 2009 and the portion of fiscal 2008 subsequent to their acquisitions on August 1, 2007, September 17, 2007 and September 26, 2007, respectively. DSI, Verimetrix, Strong Dental, GE Water, Twist and Crosstex are not reflected in the results of operations for all other periods presented. Carsen is reflected as a discontinued operation for all years presented.

 

Consolidated Statements of Income Data
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

260,050

 

$

249,374

 

$

219,044

 

$

192,179

 

$

137,157

 

Cost of sales

 

160,571

 

161,748

 

140,032

 

122,963

 

83,276

 

Gross profit

 

99,479

 

87,626

 

79,012

 

69,216

 

53,881

 

Income from continuing operations before interest expense and income taxes

 

27,451

 

17,967

 

16,839

 

15,344

 

14,322

 

Interest expense, net

 

2,495

 

4,116

 

2,737

 

3,393

 

940

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

24,956

 

13,851

 

14,102

 

11,951

 

13,382

 

Income taxes

 

9,387

 

5,158

 

5,998

 

5,298

 

5,487

 

Income from continuing operations

 

15,569

 

8,693

 

8,104

 

6,653

 

7,895

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 

342

 

10,268

 

7,610

 

Gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 

 

6,776

 

 

Net income

 

$

15,569

 

$

8,693

 

$

8,446

 

$

23,697

 

$

15,505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic: (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.96

 

$

0.54

 

$

0.52

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.53

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

0.02

 

0.66

 

0.52

 

Gain on disposal of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

0.44

 

 

Net income

 

$

0.96

 

$

0.54

 

$

0.54

 

$

1.53

 

$

1.05

 

Diluted: (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.94

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.50

 

$

0.41

 

$

0.49

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

0.02

 

0.63

 

0.47

 

Gain on disposal of discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

0.42

 

 

Net income

 

$

0.94

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.52

 

$

1.46

 

$

0.96

 

Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares: (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

16,287

 

16,116

 

15,631

 

15,471

 

14,830

 

Diluted

 

16,481

 

16,371

 

16,153

 

16,276

 

16,208

 

 

24



 

Consolidated Balance Sheets Data

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

 

 

July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

277,871

 

$

279,190

 

$

263,671

 

$

238,227

 

$

165,279

 

Current assets

 

88,910

 

84,561

 

76,731

 

82,448

 

94,490

 

Current liabilities

 

39,113

 

38,922

 

35,971

 

39,097

 

43,475

 

Working capital

 

49,797

 

45,639

 

40,760

 

43,351

 

51,015

 

Long-term debt

 

33,300

 

50,300

 

51,000

 

34,000

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

187,116

 

168,712

 

155,070

 

140,805

 

108,626

 

Book value per outstanding common share (1)

 

$

11.24

 

$

10.31

 

$

9.62

 

$

9.14

 

$

7.24

 

Common shares outstanding (1)

 

16,644

 

16,371

 

16,116

 

15,399

 

15,005

 

 


(1)

 

Per share and share amounts have been adjusted to reflect a three-for-two stock split effected in the form of a 50% stock dividend paid in January 2005.

 

25



 

Item 7.

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

 

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help you understand Cantel Medical Corp. (“Cantel”). The MD&A is provided as a supplement to and should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the accompanying notes. Our MD&A includes the following sections:

 

Overview provides a brief description of our business and a summary of significant activity that has affected or may affect our results of continuing operations and financial condition.

 

Results of Operations provides a discussion of the consolidated results of continuing operations for fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008, and fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources provides an overview of our working capital, cash flows, contractual obligations, financing and foreign currency activities.

 

Critical Accounting Policies provides a discussion of our accounting policies that require critical judgments, assumptions and estimates.

 

Overview

 

Cantel is a leading provider of infection prevention and control products in the healthcare market, specializing in the following operating segments:

 

·                  Water Purification and Filtration: Water purification equipment and services, filtration and separation products, and disinfectants for the medical, pharmaceutical, biotech, beverage and commercial industrial markets.

 

·                  Healthcare Disposables: Single-use, infection control products used principally in the dental market including face masks, towels and bibs, tray covers, saliva ejectors, germicidal wipes, plastic cups, sterilization pouches and disinfectants.

 

·                  Dialysis: Medical device reprocessing systems, sterilants/disinfectants, dialysate concentrates and other supplies for renal dialysis.

 

·                  Endoscope Reprocessing: Medical device reprocessing systems, disinfectants, enzymatic detergents and other supplies used to high-level disinfect flexible endoscopes.

 

·      Therapeutic Filtration: Hollow fiber membrane filtration and separation technologies for medical applications. (Included in All Other reporting segment.)

 

·                  Specialty Packaging: Specialty packaging and thermal control products, as well as related compliance training, for the transport of infectious and biological specimens and thermally sensitive pharmaceutical, medical and other products. (Included in All Other reporting segment.)

 

Most of our equipment, consumables and supplies are used to help prevent or control the occurrence or spread of infections.

 

26



 

Significant Activity

 

(i)

 

Net income increased by 79% in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008 despite sales growth of only 4%. We continue to benefit from having a broad portfolio of infection prevention and control products sold into diverse business segments and we have proactively developed our overall business to where approximately 75% of our consolidated net sales are consumable products and service. Our four largest business segments, which include Water Purification and Filtration, Healthcare Disposables, Dialysis and Endoscope Reprocessing each performed extremely well and contributed the vast majority of the increase to net income in fiscal 2009. The primary factors that contributed to this financial performance, as further described elsewhere in this MD&A, were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

·

improved gross margins as a result of numerous profit improvement and sales and marketing initiatives and the continued shift in sales mix to higher margin disposables,

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

realization of price increases,

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

reductions in manufacturing, raw material and distribution costs,

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

general company-wide efforts to control operating expenses while still investing in sales, marketing and research and development activities,

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

an increase in demand for healthcare disposables products principally in our fourth quarter as a result of the outbreak of the novel H1N1 flu (swine flu), and

 

 

 

 

 

 

·

favorable interest costs due to both reduced average interest rates as well as lower outstanding borrowings.

 

 

 

 

 

 

However, we cannot provide assurances that this level of growth can continue to be achieved, especially given the economic downturn, uncertainty surrounding the severity of the novel H1N1 flu outbreak and other potential risks or uncertainties. See “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

 

 

 

(ii)

 

We sell our dialysis products to a concentrated number of customers. Sales in our Dialysis segment were adversely impacted by continued loss of some low margin dialysate concentrate business from domestic customers as a result of the highly competitive and price sensitive market for such product, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A. Additionally, although international concentrate sales were very strong in fiscal 2009, we cannot provide assurances that the current level of concentrate sales to international customers will be sustained.

 

 

 

(iii)

 

The deterioration in the economy and credit markets adversely impacted our sales in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008 by causing some of our customers to delay spending on certain products, especially capital equipment in our Endoscope Reprocessing and Water Purification and Filtration segments, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A. Sales of capital equipment represent approximately 25% of our overall consolidated net sales and are included in our Water Purification and Filtration, Dialysis and Endoscope Reprocessing segments.

 

 

 

(iv)

 

In June 2008, we announced and began executing our plan to restructure our Netherlands manufacturing operations as part of our continuing effort to reduce operating costs and leverage our existing United States infrastructure. As a result of this restructuring, approximately $345,000 and $365,000 of restructuring costs were recorded in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively, which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations by $0.02 in each of fiscals 2009 and 2008, as more fully described in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and elsewhere in this MD&A.

 

27



 

(v)

 

Fluctuations in the rates of currency exchange had an overall favorable impact on our net income in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, despite the adverse impact on net sales, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A.

 

 

 

(vi)

 

In July 2009, we extended the life of certain “out-of-the-money” stock options previously awarded to certain executive officers. As a result, approximately $703,000 of additional stock-based compensation expense was recorded in fiscal 2009, which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations by $0.03, as more fully described in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and elsewhere in this MD&A.

 

 

 

(vii)

 

Effective April 22, 2008, our former President and Chief Executive Officer resigned and our Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President was promoted to President. As a result of this resignation, a charge of approximately $720,000 primarily relating to separation benefits was recorded, which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations by approximately $0.03 in fiscal 2008, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A.

 

 

 

(viii)

 

Fiscal 2009 acquisition: We acquired the business of G.E.M. Water Systems Int’l, LLC (“G.E.M.”) on July 31, 2009, as more fully described in “Business — Fiscal 2009 Acquisition” and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 

(ix)

 

Fiscal 2008 acquisitions: We acquired the businesses of Dialysis Services, Inc. (“DSI”) on August 1, 2007, Verimetrix, LLC (“Verimetrix”) on September 17, 2007, and Strong Dental Products, Inc. (“Strong Dental”) on September 26, 2007, as more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

 

(x)

 

Fiscal 2007 acquisitions: We acquired GE Water & Process Technologies’ water dialysis business (the “GE Water Acquisition” or “GE Water”) on March 30, 2007 and the business of Twist 2 It Inc. (“Twist”) on July 9, 2007, as more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Results of Operations

 

The results of operations reflect the continuing operating results of Cantel and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, but exclude the operating results of Carsen Group Inc. (“Carsen”), which is reported as a discontinued operation for all years presented. The Olympus distribution agreements with Carsen, as well as Carsen’s active business operations, terminated on July 31, 2006, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A and Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Since the GE Water and Twist acquisitions were completed on March 30, 2007 and July 9, 2007, respectively, their results of operations are included in our results of operations for fiscals 2009 and 2008 and the portion of fiscal 2007 subsequent to their respective acquisition dates.

 

Since the DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental acquisitions were completed on August 1, 2007, September 17, 2007 and September 26, 2007, respectively, their results of operations are included in our results of operations for fiscal 2009 and the portion of fiscal 2008 subsequent to their respective acquisition dates and are not reflected in our results of operations for fiscal 2007. The acquisitions of DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental had an overall insignificant effect on our results of operations for fiscal 2009 and the portion of fiscal 2008 subsequent to their respective acquisition dates due to the small size of these businesses.

 

Since the G.E.M. acquisition was completed on the last day of fiscal 2009, its results of operations are not reflected in our results of operations for any years presented.

 

For fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007, discussion herein of our pre-existing business refers to all of our reporting segments with the exception of the operating results of the GE Water Acquisition included in our Water Purification and Filtration reporting segment.

 

28



 

The following table gives information as to the net sales from continuing operations and the percentage to the total net sales from continuing operations for each of our reporting segments.

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

(Dollar Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

$

 

%

 

$

 

%

 

$

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water Purification and Filtration

 

$

71,340

 

27.4

 

$

68,589

 

27.5

 

$

49,032

 

22.4

 

Healthcare Disposables

 

64,085

 

24.7

 

58,657

 

23.5

 

57,610

 

26.3

 

Dialysis

 

56,414

 

21.7

 

60,075

 

24.1

 

58,696

 

26.8

 

Endoscope Reprocessing

 

52,333

 

20.1

 

46,924

 

18.8

 

38,941

 

17.8

 

All Other

 

15,878

 

6.1

 

15,129

 

6.1

 

14,765

 

6.7

 

 

 

$

260,050

 

100.0

 

$

249,374

 

100.0

 

$

219,044

 

100.0

 

 

Fiscal 2009 compared with Fiscal 2008

 

Net sales

 

Net sales increased by $10,676,000, or 4.3%, to $260,050,000 in fiscal 2009 from $249,374,000 in fiscal 2008.

 

Net sales were adversely impacted in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008 by approximately $950,000 due to the translation of Canadian dollar net sales, primarily of our Water Purification and Filtration operating segment, using a weaker Canadian dollar against the United States dollar.

 

The increase in net sales in fiscal 2009 was principally attributable to increases in sales of healthcare disposables products, endoscope reprocessing products and services, water purification and filtration products and services and therapeutic filtration products (included in All Other), partially offset by a decrease in dialysis products.

 

Net sales of healthcare disposables products increased by 9.3% in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008 despite negative growth in the overall dental market, primarily due to (i) increased sales volume of high margin face masks, disinfectants and other healthcare disposables products due to the outbreak of the novel H1N1 flu (swine flu) in April 2009, (ii) approximately $2,700,000 in higher net sales due to an increase in selling prices, which were implemented to offset corresponding supplier cost increases, (iii) the adverse impact on the first quarter of fiscal 2008 due to the consolidation of certain distributors of our dental products during 2007 resulting in the rationalization of duplicate inventories of the consolidated companies and (iv) approximately $194,000 in incremental net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 due to the acquisition of Strong Dental during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Although the outbreak of the novel H1N1 flu has resulted in strong sales volume during our fourth quarter of high margin face masks and other healthcare disposables products, we cannot provide assurances that such increased sales levels can be sustained throughout fiscal 2010 since such demand is highly dependent upon the severity and timing of the novel H1N1 flu, the ability of our Company to educate existing customers and potential new customers on the benefits of our face masks, disinfectants and other products and the level of urgency our customers and the general public develop and maintain with respect to epidemic and pandemic preparedness.

 

Net sales of endoscope reprocessing products and services increased by 11.5% in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008 primarily due to (i) the increase in demand in the United States for our disinfectants and product service due to the increased field population of equipment as well as our ability to gradually convert the sale of such items from our former equipment distributor (who continued to purchase high-level disinfectants, cleaners and consumables from us and provide product service to our customers) to our direct sales and service force at higher selling prices, (ii) higher selling prices, most of which relates to the direct sale of disinfectants, consumables and product service, which resulted in approximately $2,250,000 in incremental net sales in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008, and (iii) approximately $184,000 in incremental net sales in the first quarter of our fiscal 2009 due to the acquisition of Verimetrix during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in sales of endoscope reprocessing equipment in fiscal 2009 as a result of delayed spending on such investments due to the recent deterioration in the general economy and credit markets, which may continue to adversely affect future equipment sales.

 

29



 

Net sales of water purification and filtration products and services increased by 4.0% in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008, primarily due to (i) an increase in demand during fiscal 2009 for our sterilants and filters by pharmaceutical companies and within our installed equipment base of business, including one of our largest customers who standardized on our consumable products in their ordering system utilized by their dialysis clinics and (ii) higher selling prices, which offset increased manufacturing costs and favorably impacted net sales in fiscal 2009 by approximately $2,150,000. Partially offsetting these increases were delayed investments during fiscal 2009 by customers of our water purification equipment used for dialysis as well as for commercial and industrial (large capital) applications as a result of the deterioration in the general economy and credit markets, which may continue to adversely affect capital equipment sales, and an $880,000 decrease in sales due to the translation of Canadian dollar net sales using a weaker Canadian dollar against the United States dollar.

 

Net sales contributed by the Therapeutic Filtration operating segment were $9,523,000, an increase of 14.8%, in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008. The increase in sales was primarily due to increases in both international and domestic demand for our hemoconcentrator products (filtration devices used to concentrate red blood cells and remove excess fluid from the bloodstream during open-heart surgery) and hemofilter products (filtration devices that perform a slow, continuous blood filtration therapy used to control fluid overload and acute renal failure in unstable, critically ill patients who cannot tolerate the rapid filtration rates of conventional hemodialysis). Increases in selling prices of our therapeutic filtration products did not have a significant effect on net sales in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008.

 

Net sales of dialysis products and services decreased by 6.1% in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008, primarily due to (i) the continuing adverse impact of previously losing some dialysate concentrate business (a concentrated acid or bicarbonate used to prepare dialysate, a chemical solution that draws waste products from a patient’s blood through a dialyzer membrane during hemodialysis treatment) from domestic customers as a result of the highly competitive and price sensitive market for this low margin commodity product, and (ii) a decrease in net sales of low margin dialysis reuse supplies. Due to sales price decreases by some of our competitors, we expect a continued decrease in net sales of our low margin dialysate concentrate product in fiscal 2010 as we elect not to pursue unprofitable concentrate sales. Furthermore, Fresenius Medical Care (“Fresenius”), the largest dialysis provider chain in the United States, manufactures dialysate concentrate themselves and has been gradually decreasing their purchases of that product from us and may continue to do so in fiscal 2010. Additionally, we cannot provide assurances that the level of concentrate sales to international customers will be sustained. Partially offsetting these decreases were higher selling prices, which favorably impacted net sales in fiscal 2009 by approximately $950,000, to partially offset higher manufacturing and shipping costs, including freight invoiced to customers (related costs of a similar amount are included within cost of sales).

 

Net sales contributed by the Specialty Packaging operating segment were $6,355,000 in fiscal 2009, a decrease of 7.0% compared with fiscal 2008. This decrease in sales was primarily due to decreased customer demand in the United States for our specialty packaging products due to changes in regulatory requirements, increased competition and a decrease in clinical trials by our customers primarily due to the deterioration in the general economy. Increases in selling prices of our specialty packaging products did not have a significant effect on net sales in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008.

 

Gross profit

 

Gross profit increased by $11,853,000, or 13.5%, to $99,479,000 in fiscal 2009 from $87,626,000 in fiscal 2008. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales in fiscals 2009 and 2008 was 38.3% and 35.1%, respectively.

 

The gross profit percentage in fiscal 2009 increased compared with fiscal 2008 primarily due to (i) favorable sales mix due to the increased sales volume of certain high margin products such as disinfectants and consumables in our Endoscope Reprocessing segment, face masks and sterilization accessories in our Healthcare Disposables segment, and sterilants and filters in our Water Purification and Filtration segment, as well as decreased sales of our low margin dialysate concentrate product in our Dialysis segment, (ii) higher selling prices including those attributable to our ability to gradually convert the sale of high-level disinfectants, cleaners, and consumables in our Endoscope Reprocessing segment from our former equipment distributor to our direct sales and service force at higher selling prices, (iii) a decrease in raw material and distribution costs in all our segments due to the lower price of fuel and oil, (iv) improved efficiencies in our manufacturing, distribution and service functions and (v) inefficiencies in our Water Purification and Filtration segment during the three months ended October 31, 2007 as a result of the integration of the acquired GE Water & Process Technologies’ water dialysis business into our facilities. However, we cannot provide assurances that this gross profit percentage can be sustained, especially if raw materials and distribution costs increase and we are unable to implement price increases or we experience a significant change in sales mix away from higher margin products.

 

30



 

Operating expenses

 

Selling expenses increased by $1,762,000, or 6.2%, to $30,398,000 in fiscal 2009 from $28,636,000 in fiscal 2008, primarily due to (i) higher compensation expense relating to annual salary increases and incentive compensation in all of our reporting segments and additional sales personnel primarily in our Water Purification and Filtration and Healthcare Disposables segments and (ii) an increase of approximately $285,000 in advertising and marketing expense primarily related to our Healthcare Disposables segment. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $280,000 as a result of translating selling expenses of our international subsidiaries using a weaker Canadian dollar and euro against the United States dollar.

 

Selling expenses as a percentage of net sales were 11.7% in fiscal 2009 compared with 11.5% in fiscal 2008.

 

General and administrative expenses were $36,998,000 and $37,013,000 in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively.  General and administrative expenses decreased principally due to (i) the prior year inclusion of approximately $720,000 in separation benefits and other costs related to the resignation of our former President and Chief Executive Officer on April 22, 2008, (ii) a decrease in overhead at our Netherlands operation due to the completion of restructuring activities, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A, (iii) a decrease of approximately $580,000 as a result of foreign exchange gains associated with translating certain foreign denominated assets into functional currencies and the translation of general and administrative expenses of our international subsidiaries using a significantly weaker Canadian dollar against the United States dollar, and (iv) a decrease of $522,000 in amortization expense of intangible assets. These decreases were offset by an increase in compensation expense primarily related to annual salary increases and incentive compensation in all of our locations and an increase of approximately $1,106,000 in stock-based compensation expense including a $703,000 charge in July 2009 to extend the life of certain “out-of-the-money” stock options previously awarded to certain executive officers, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A.

 

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales were 14.2% in fiscal 2009 compared with 14.8% in fiscal 2008.

 

Research and development expenses (which include continuing engineering costs) were $4,632,000 and $4,010,000 in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in research and development expenses in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, is primarily due to increased development work on certain new products as well as continuing engineering on existing products primarily in our Water Purification and Filtration, Endoscope Reprocessing and Therapeutic Filtration segments.

 

Interest

 

Interest expense decreased by $1,992,000 to $2,639,000 in fiscal 2009, from $4,631,000 in fiscal 2008, primarily due to decreases in average outstanding borrowings and average interest rates, partially offset by a $148,000 charge relating to the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of an interest rate cap agreement, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Interest income decreased by $371,000 to $144,000 in fiscal 2009, from $515,000 in fiscal 2008, primarily due to a decrease in average interest rates. 

 

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes increased by $11,105,000 to $24,956,000 in fiscal 2009 from $13,851,000 in fiscal 2008. The increase was primarily attributable to the improved gross profit percentage on increased sales as well as lower interest expense, as further explained above.

 

31



 

Income taxes

 

The consolidated effective tax rate was 37.6% and 37.2% in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively. The consolidated effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was affected principally by the geographic mix of pre-tax income, repatriation of cash from our foreign subsidiaries and the impact of various tax rate changes, as described below.

 

The majority of our income from continuing operations before income taxes was generated from our United States operations, which had an overall effective tax rate of 38.6% and 34.4% in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in our United States effective tax rate in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, was due to an increase in our Federal tax rate to 35.0% and additional taxes relating to the repatriation of approximately $11,400,000 in earnings from our subsidiaries in Canada and the Netherlands, partially offset by recently enacted Federal tax legislation that enabled us to claim the research and experimentation tax credit as well as New York state tax rate reductions enacted in 2008, which primarily relate to our Healthcare Disposables segment. Such New York state tax rate reductions had a significant favorable effect on our fiscal 2008 effective tax rate in the year of enactment.

 

Approximately 5% of our fiscal 2009 income from continuing operations before income taxes was generated from our Canadian operations, which had an overall effective tax rate in fiscals 2009 and 2008 of 16.8% and 22.5%, respectively. Overall statutory tax rates in Canada are significantly below comparable rates in the United States. Additionally, the low overall effective tax rate in fiscal 2009 was attributable to the impact of a lower overall effective rate in our Specialty Packaging segment due to recently enacted rate reductions as applied to existing deferred income tax liabilities.

 

Due to the uncertainty of our Netherlands subsidiary utilizing tax benefits in the future, a tax benefit was not recorded on the losses from operations at our Netherlands subsidiary in fiscals 2009 and 2008, thereby adversely affecting our overall consolidated effective tax rate. The overall loss from our Netherlands operation in fiscal 2009 decreased compared with fiscal 2008 as a result of the restructuring of its operations, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

The results of operations for our subsidiaries in Japan and Singapore did not have a significant impact on our overall effective tax rate in fiscals 2009 and 2008 due to the size of these operations relative to our United States, Canada and Netherlands operations. However, during fiscal 2008, we decided to place a full valuation allowance against the NOLs of our Japanese subsidiary, which resulted in the recording of tax expense on the past losses of our subsidiary in Japan.

 

We record liabilities for an unrecognized tax benefit when a tax benefit for an uncertain tax position is taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, but is not recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements because it does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold that the uncertain tax position would be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority. The majority of our unrecognized tax benefits originated from acquisitions. Accordingly, any adjustments upon resolution of income tax uncertainties that predate or result from acquisitions have been recorded as an increase or decrease to goodwill. On August 1, 2009, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”)  No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”), which requires the resolution of income tax uncertainties that predate or result from acquisitions to be recognized in our results of operations beginning with fiscal 2010. However, if our unrecognized tax benefits are recognized in our financial statements in future periods, there would not be a significant impact to our effective tax rate due to the size of the unrecognized tax benefits in relation to our income from continuing operations before income taxes. We do not expect such unrecognized tax benefits to significantly decrease or increase in the next twelve months.

 

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

 

 

Unrecognized

 

 

 

Tax Benefits

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits on August 1, 2007

 

$

484,000

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

(57,000

)

Unrecognized tax benefits on July 31, 2008

 

427,000

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

(47,000

)

Unrecognized tax benefits on July 31, 2009

 

$

380,000

 

 

32



 

Generally, the Company is no longer subject to federal, state or foreign income tax examinations for fiscal years ended prior to July 31, 2003.

 

Our policy is to record potential interest and penalties related to income tax positions in interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively, in our Consolidated Financial Statements. However, such amounts have been relatively insignificant due to the amount of our unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain tax positions.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The following table shows the income statement components of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales

 

$

70,000

 

$

43,000

 

$

43,000

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling

 

216,000

 

123,000

 

159,000

 

General and administrative

 

2,884,000

 

1,778,000

 

1,258,000

 

Research and development

 

17,000

 

17,000

 

22,000

 

Total operating expenses

 

3,117,000

 

1,918,000

 

1,439,000

 

Stock-based compensation before income taxes

 

3,187,000

 

1,961,000

 

1,482,000

 

Income tax benefits

 

(1,226,000

)

(758,000

)

(490,000

)

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

 

$

1,961,000

 

$

1,203,000

 

$

992,000

 

 

The above stock-based compensation expense before income taxes was recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements as stock-based compensation expense (which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations by $0.12, $0.07 and $0.06 in fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively) and an increase to additional paid-in capital. The related income tax benefits (which pertain only to stock awards and options that do not qualify as incentive stock options) were recorded as an increase to long-term deferred income tax assets (which are netted with long-term deferred income tax liabilities) or a reduction to income taxes payable, depending on the timing of the deduction, and a reduction to income tax expense.

 

On July 31, 2009, we extended the life of 456,001 fully vested “out-of-the-money” stock options previously awarded to certain executive officers (seven individuals in total) under our 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan. Such options were scheduled to expire within six months after July 31, 2009 and had exercise prices ranging from $17.14 to $22.93, which were greater than the closing price of $15.48 on July 31, 2009, the date the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors authorized the modification. The sole modification was to extend the options’ expiration dates to January 31, 2011. All other terms and conditions of the stock options remain the same. As a result of this modification, approximately $703,000 in additional stock-based compensation expense was recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements on July 31, 2009, which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.03.

 

The stock-based compensation expense recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements may not be representative of the effect of stock-based compensation expense in future periods due to the level of awards issued in past years (which level may not be similar in the future), assumptions used in determining fair value, expected lives and estimated forfeitures. We determine the fair value of each stock award using the closing market price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The determination of fair value using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the expected option life (which is determined by using the historical closing prices of our Common Stock), the expected dividend yield (which is expected to be 0%), and the expected option life (which is based on historical exercise behavior). If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of SFAS 123R in future periods, the compensation expense that we would record under SFAS 123R may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.

 

33



 

Most of our stock option and stock awards (which consist only of restricted shares) are subject to graded vesting in which portions of the award vest at different times during the vesting period, as opposed to awards that vest at the end of the vesting period. We recognize compensation expense for awards subject to graded vesting using the straight-line basis, reduced by estimated forfeitures. At July 31, 2009, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, related to total nonvested stock options and stock awards which are expected to vest was $2,157,000 with a remaining weighted average period of 20 months over which such expense is expected to be recognized.

 

If certain criteria are met when options are exercised or restricted stock becomes vested, the Company is allowed a deduction on its income tax return. Accordingly, we account for the income tax effect on such income tax deductions as additional paid-in capital and as a reduction of income taxes payable. In fiscals 2009 and 2008, options exercised and the vesting of restricted stock resulted in income tax deductions that reduced income taxes payable by $745,000 and $895,000, respectively.

 

We classify the cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits as financing cash flows on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Excess tax benefits arise when the ultimate tax effect of the deduction for tax purposes is greater than the tax benefit on stock compensation expense (including tax benefits on stock compensation expense that has only been reflected in past pro forma disclosures relating to fiscal years prior to August 1, 2005) which was determined based upon the award’s fair value.

 

Fiscal 2008 compared with Fiscal 2007

 

Net sales

 

Net sales increased by $30,330,000, or 13.8%, to $249,374,000 in fiscal 2008 from $219,044,000 in fiscal 2007. Net sales of our pre-existing business increased by $13,154,000, or 6.2%, to $225,249,000 in fiscal 2008 compared with $212,095,000 in fiscal 2007. Net sales contributed by the GE Water Acquisition in fiscal 2008 and 2007 were $24,125,000 and $6,949,000, respectively.

 

Net sales were positively impacted in fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007 by approximately $1,040,000 due to the translation of euro net sales primarily of our Endoscope Reprocessing and Dialysis operating segments using a stronger euro against the United States dollar.

 

In addition, net sales were positively impacted in fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007 by approximately $815,000 due to the translation of Canadian dollar net sales primarily of our Water Purification and Filtration operating segment using a stronger Canadian dollar against the United States dollar.

 

Although net sales in all of our reporting segments increased in fiscal 2008, the increase in net sales of our pre-existing business in fiscal 2008 was principally attributable to increases in sales of endoscope reprocessing products and services and water purification and filtration products and services.

 

Net sales of endoscope reprocessing products and services increased by 20.5% in fiscal 2008, compared with fiscal 2007, primarily due to (i) an increase in demand for our endoscope disinfection equipment and disinfectants both internationally and in the United States and product service in the United States, (ii) approximately $1,950,000 in incremental net sales in fiscal 2008 due to the acquisition of Verimetrix on September 17, 2007 and (iii) approximately $1,670,000 in higher net sales due to an increase in selling prices of our Medivators endoscope reprocessing equipment and related products and service in the United States as a result of selling directly to our customers and not through a distributor. Beginning in our second quarter of fiscal 2007, we commenced the sale of equipment directly to our customers in the United States. Although this distributor continued to purchase high-level disinfectants, cleaners and consumables from us and provide product service to our customers during fiscals 2008 and 2007, we have been gradually converting the sale of such items to our direct sales and service force at higher selling prices. The increase in demand for our disinfectants and product service is also attributable to the increased field population of equipment and our ability to convert users of competitive disinfectants to our products.

 

Net sales of water purification and filtration products and services from our pre-existing business increased by 5.7% in fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007, primarily due to an increase in demand for our water purification equipment from dialysis customers as well as an increase in service revenue from the improved density and efficiency of our pre-existing service delivery network partially due to recent acquisitions. This increase was partially offset in fiscal 2008 by a decrease in commercial and industrial (large capital) equipment sales as a result of (i) our decision made in early fiscal 2007 to refocus our efforts on selling large capital equipment with standardized designs instead of customized designs that have historically

 

34



 

provided lower profitability and (ii) delayed investments in capital equipment by customers due to the softening of the United States economy. Increases in selling prices of our water purification products and services did not have a significant effect on net sales in fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007.

 

With respect to GE Water, which is excluded from the above discussion of our pre-existing business, average quarterly sales of water purification and filtration products and services in fiscal 2008 were approximately 15% higher when compared with the post-acquisition period ended July 31, 2007, due to improved sales opportunities within the installed equipment base of business as a result of combining GE Water with our pre-existing water purification and filtration business.

 

Net sales of dialysis products and services increased by 2.3% in fiscal 2008, compared with fiscal 2007, primarily due to (i) increased demand during the first nine months of fiscal 2008 from customers, both in the United States and internationally, for dialysate concentrate (a concentrated acid or bicarbonate used to prepare dialysate, a chemical solution that draws waste products from a patient’s blood through a dialyzer membrane during hemodialysis treatment) and (ii) higher selling prices primarily on dialysate concentrate, including freight invoiced to customers (related costs of a similar amount are included within cost of sales), to partially offset increased manufacturing and shipping costs. This increase in net sales was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $2,600,000, or 27%, in net sales of dialysate concentrate during the three months ended July 31, 2008, compared with the three months ended July 31, 2007, due to the loss of some dialysate concentrate business as a result of the highly competitive and price sensitive market for this low margin commodity product.

 

Net sales of healthcare disposable products increased by 1.8% in fiscal 2008, compared with fiscal 2007, primarily due to (i) an increase in demand during the second half of fiscal 2008 for our instrument sterilization pouches, cups, towels and face mask products, (ii) approximately $2,032,000 in incremental net sales in fiscal 2008 due to the acquisitions of Strong Dental on September 26, 2007 and Twist on July 9, 2007 and (iii) approximately $1,639,000 in higher net sales due to an increase in selling prices. Such selling price increases were implemented to offset corresponding supplier cost increases and therefore did not have a significant impact on gross profit. Partially offsetting these increases in 2008 net sales were (i) a high level of demand during the first three months of fiscal 2007 for face mask products due to a heightened awareness of avian flu prevention and (ii) distributors of our dental products had undergone consolidation during 2007, which has adversely impacted sales of our Healthcare Disposables segment in fiscal 2008 due to the loss of some private label business, and with respect to the first three months of fiscal 2008 and our fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, rationalization of duplicate inventories in the consolidated companies.

 

Net sales contributed by the Therapeutic Filtration operating segment were $8,294,000, an increase of 6.5%, in fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007. The increase in sales in fiscal 2008 was primarily due to the recommencement in February 2007 of sales of filters manufactured by us on an OEM basis for a single customer’s hydration system. This customer had previously experienced a voluntary recall of the system (unrelated to our product) and was not purchasing filters until their sales of hydration systems recommenced. Increases in selling prices of our therapeutic filtration products did not have a significant effect on net sales in fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007.

 

Net sales contributed by the Specialty Packaging operating segment were $6,835,000, a decrease of 2.1%, in fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007. This decrease in sales was primarily due to decreased customer demand in the United States for our compliance training products due to the timing of orders relating to the government mandated two-year compliance certification period, partially offset by increases in selling prices of approximately $240,000.

 

Gross profit

 

Gross profit increased by $8,614,000, or 10.9%, to $87,626,000  in fiscal 2008 from $79,012,000 in fiscal 2007. Gross profit of our pre-existing business increased by $4,197,000, or 5.5%, to $81,205,000 in fiscal 2008  from $77,008,000 in fiscal 2007. Gross profit contributed by the GE Water Acquisition in fiscal 2008 and for the four month period ended July 31, 2007 (since the date of the acquisition) was $6,421,000 and $2,004,000, respectively.

 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales in fiscals 2008 and 2007 was 35.1% and 36.1%, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales of our pre-existing business in fiscals 2008 and 2007 was 36.1% and 36.3%, respectively. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the GE Water Acquisition in fiscal 2008 and for the four month period ended July 31, 2007 (since the date of the acquisition) was 26.6% and 28.8%, respectively.

 

The gross profit percentage of our pre-existing business in fiscal 2008 decreased compared with fiscal 2007 primarily due to (i) a change in sales mix, including increases in sales of Renalin sterilant to large national chains that

 

35



 

typically receive more favorable pricing, and lower margin water purification services, and with respect to the first six months of fiscal 2008 a decrease in sales of certain higher margin healthcare disposables products such as face masks, (ii) an increase in raw material, manufacturing and shipping costs in all of our operating segments, (iii) unabsorbed manufacturing overhead due to the decrease in commercial and industrial (large capital) equipment sales in our Water Purification and Filtration segment, (iv) inefficiencies in our Water Purification and Filtration segment as a result of the integration of the GE Water Acquisition into our pre-existing business, which is now complete, and (v) approximately $275,000 in restructuring charges recorded primarily in our Endoscope Reprocessing segment in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 relating to the relocation of our Netherlands manufacturing operations, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in gross profit percentage in our Endoscope Reprocessing segment as a result of selling our Medivators brand endoscope reprocessing equipment and related products and service directly to customers through our own United States field sales and service organization instead of through a distributor as was done during a significant portion of the first three months of fiscal 2007. Additionally, although this distributor continued to purchase high-level disinfectants, cleaners and consumables from us and provide product service to our customers during fiscals 2008 and 2007, we have been gradually converting the sale of such high margin items to our direct sales and service force resulting in an increase in gross profit percentage.

 

With respect to GE Water, which is excluded from the above discussion of our pre-existing business, the gross profit percentage of water purification and filtration products and services decreased to approximately 26.6% in fiscal 2008 from 28.8% for the four months ended July 31, 2007 (since the date of the acquisition) due to increased manufacturing costs.

 

With respect to the increase in the amount of gross profit (as opposed to the discussion of gross profit percentage), increases in net sales as explained above constitute the most significant factor in the increase in gross profit.

 

Operating expenses

 

Selling expenses increased by $4,818,000, or 20.2%, to $28,636,000 in fiscal 2008 from $23,818,000 in fiscal 2007 principally due to higher compensation expense of approximately $3,900,000 (including travel costs) primarily relating to increased commissions on increased sales by our endoscope reprocessing direct sales network and additional headcount resulting from the GE Water Acquisition; an increase of approximately $340,000 in advertising and marketing expense primarily related to our Healthcare Disposables segment; and an increase of approximately $280,000 as a result of translating selling expenses of our international subsidiaries using a significantly stronger Canadian dollar and euro against the United States dollar.

 

Selling expenses as a percentage of net sales were 11.5% in fiscal 2008 compared with 10.9% in fiscal 2007. Increases in selling expenses as explained above constitute the most significant factor in the higher selling expense as a percentage of net sales.

 

General and administrative expenses increased by $3,506,000, or 10.5%, to $37,013,000 in fiscal 2008 from $33,507,000 in fiscal 2007 principally due to an increase of approximately $1,200,000 in compensation expense due to additional headcount in our Water Purification and Filtration segment, annual salary increases, severance expense related to the relocation of our Medivators’ manufacturing operations from the Netherlands to the United States and incentive compensation relating to the DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental acquisitions; an increase of $782,000 in amortization expense of intangible assets primarily relating to our acquisitions of GE Water, Twist, DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental; the inclusion of approximately $720,000 in estimated separation benefits and other costs related to the resignation of our former President and Chief Executive Officer on April 22, 2008, as more fully described elsewhere in this MD&A; an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $520,000; and an increase of approximately $565,000 as a result of foreign exchange losses associated with translating certain foreign denominated assets into functional currencies as well as the translation of general and administrative expenses of our international subsidiaries using a significantly stronger Canadian dollar and euro against the United States dollar. Partially offsetting these increases was the non-reoccurrence of $137,000 in incentive compensation directly related to the GE Water Acquisition, which was incurred during the three months ended April 30, 2007.

 

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales were 14.8% in fiscal 2008, compared with 15.3% in fiscal 2007.

 

Research and development expenses (which include continuing engineering costs) were $4,010,000 and $4,848,000 in fiscals 2008 and 2007, respectively. The majority of our research and development expenses related to our MDS endoscope reprocessor and specialty filtration products. The decrease in research and development expense in fiscal 2008, compared with fiscal 2007, is due to less development work on the European version of our MDS endoscope reprocessor.

 

36



 

Interest

 

Interest expense increased by $1,123,000 to $4,631,000 in fiscal 2008 from $3,508,000 in fiscal 2007 primarily due to the increase in average outstanding borrowings as a result of financing the purchase prices of the acquisitions of GE Water, DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental.

 

Interest income decreased by $256,000 to $515,000 in fiscal 2008 from $771,000 in fiscal 2007 primarily due to a lower average balance of cash and cash equivalents and a decrease in average interest rates.

 

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes decreased by $251,000 to $13,851,000 in fiscal 2008 from $14,102,000 in fiscal 2007.

 

Income taxes

 

The consolidated effective tax rate was 37.2% and 42.5% for fiscals 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in the consolidated effective tax rate was affected principally by the geographic mix of pre-tax income and statutory tax rate reductions as described below.

 

The majority of our income from continuing operations before income taxes is generated from our United States operations, which had an overall effective tax rate in fiscal 2008 of 34.4%. This low overall effective rate is principally caused by (i) our combined federal and state statutory tax rate of approximately 37.5% as applied to current operations and (ii) recently enacted New York state tax rate reductions as applied to existing deferred income tax liabilities in our Healthcare Disposables segment.

 

Our Canadian operations had an overall effective tax rate in fiscal 2008 of 22.5%, which overall rate was favorably impacted by recently enacted Canadian federal tax rate reductions as applied to existing deferred income tax liabilities in the Canadian portion of our Water Purification and Filtration business.

 

A tax benefit was not recorded on the losses from operations at our Netherlands subsidiary for fiscals 2008 and 2007, thereby causing our overall consolidated effective tax rate to exceed the effective tax rates in our United States and Canadian operations. Although we continued to incur an overall loss from our Netherlands operation in fiscal 2008, such loss decreased significantly compared to fiscal 2007. In fiscal 2009, we completed the restructuring of our Netherlands operation as described in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and elsewhere in this MD&A.

 

Additionally, during fiscal 2008 we decided to place a full valuation allowance against the NOLs of our Japanese subsidiary, which resulted in the recording of tax expense on the past losses of our subsidiary in Japan. The results of continuing operations for our subsidiary in Singapore did not have a significant impact on our overall effective tax rate for fiscal 2008 due to the size of the operation relative to our United States, Canada and Netherlands operations.

 

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”), which clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law. FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and therefore was adopted on August 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations since, after the completion of our evaluation, we did not record an increase or decrease to our income taxes payable or deferred tax liabilities related to unrecognized income tax benefits for uncertain tax positions.

 

We record liabilities for an unrecognized tax benefit when a tax benefit for an uncertain tax position is taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, but is not recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements because it does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold that the uncertain tax position would be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority. The majority of our unrecognized tax benefits originated from acquisitions. Accordingly, any adjustments upon resolution of income tax uncertainties that predate or result from acquisitions are recorded as an increase or decrease to goodwill. Therefore, if the unrecognized tax benefits are recognized in our financial statements in future periods, there would not be a significant impact to our effective tax rate on continuing operations. We do not expect such

 

37



 

unrecognized tax benefits to significantly decrease or increase in the next twelve months. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

 

 

Unrecognized

 

 

 

Tax Benefits

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits on August 1, 2007

 

$

484,000

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

(57,000

)

Unrecognized tax benefits on July 31, 2008

 

$

427,000

 

 

Generally, the Company is no longer subject to federal, state or foreign income tax examinations for fiscal years ended prior to July 31, 2002.

 

Our policy is to record potential interest and penalties related to income tax positions in interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively, in our Consolidated Financial Statements. However, such amounts have been relatively insignificant due to the amount of our unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain tax positions.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The following table shows the income statement components of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales

 

$

43,000

 

$

43,000

 

$

50,000

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling

 

123,000

 

159,000

 

141,000

 

General and administrative

 

1,778,000

 

1,258,000

 

845,000

 

Research and development

 

17,000

 

22,000

 

20,000

 

Total operating expenses

 

1,918,000

 

1,439,000

 

1,006,000

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

122,000

 

Stock-based compensation before income taxes

 

1,961,000

 

1,482,000

 

1,178,000

 

Income tax benefits

 

(758,000

)

(490,000

)

(248,000

)

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

 

$

1,203,000

 

$

992,000

 

$

930,000

 

 

The above stock-based compensation expense before income taxes was recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements as stock-based compensation expense (which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share from net income by $0.07, $0.06 and $0.05 in fiscals 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively) and an increase to additional capital. The related income tax benefits (which pertain only to stock awards and options that do not qualify as incentive stock options) were recorded as an increase to long-term deferred income tax assets (which are netted with long-term deferred income tax liabilities) or a reduction to income taxes payable, depending on the timing of the deduction, and a reduction to income tax expense.

 

The stock-based compensation expense recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements may not be representative of the effect of stock-based compensation expense in future periods due to the level of awards issued in past years (which level may not be similar in the future), assumptions used in determining fair value and estimated forfeitures. We determine the fair value of each stock award using the closing market price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The determination of fair value using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the expected option life (which is determined by using the historical closing prices of our Common Stock), the expected dividend yield (which is expected to be 0%), and the expected option life (which is based on historical exercise behavior). If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of SFAS 123R in future periods, the

 

38



 

compensation expense that we would record under SFAS 123R may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.

 

Most of our stock option and stock awards (which consist only of restricted shares) are subject to graded vesting in which portions of the award vest at different times during the vesting period, as opposed to awards that vest at the end of the vesting period. We recognize compensation expense for awards subject to graded vesting using the straight-line basis, reduced by estimated forfeitures. At July 31, 2008, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, related to total nonvested stock options and stock awards was $2,262,000 with a remaining weighted average period of 27 months over which such expense is expected to be recognized.

 

If certain criteria are met when options are exercised, or with respect to incentive stock options the underlying shares are sold, the Company is allowed a deduction on its income tax return. Accordingly, we account for the income tax effect on such income tax deductions as additional capital (assuming deferred tax assets do not exist pertaining to the exercised stock options) and as a reduction of income taxes payable. In fiscals 2008 and 2007, options exercised resulted in income tax deductions that reduced income taxes payable by $895,000 and $1,137,000, respectively.

 

We classify the cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits as financing cash flows on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Excess tax benefits arise when the ultimate tax effect of the deduction for tax purposes is greater than the tax benefit on stock compensation expense (including tax benefits on stock compensation expense that has only been reflected in past pro forma disclosures relating to fiscal years prior to August 1, 2005) which was determined based upon the award’s fair value.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Working capital

 

At July 31, 2009, our working capital was $49,797,000, compared with $45,639,000 at July 31, 2008.

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $30,992,000, $18,557,000 and $5,967,000 for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. With respect to continuing operations only, net cash provided by operating activities was $30,992,000, $18,650,000 and $10,834,000 for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

In fiscal 2009, net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to net income (after adjusting for depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation expense and deferred income taxes) and a decrease in inventories (due to strong July sales in our Healthcare Disposables and Endoscope Reprocessing segments as well as a decrease in the cost of certain raw materials), partially offset by an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets (due to an increase in prepaid commissions relating to service contracts in our Endoscope Reprocessing segment, as well as the timing of certain insurance premium payments).

 

In fiscal 2008, net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to net income (after adjusting for depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation expense and deferred income taxes), a decrease in accounts receivable (due to improved collections) and an increase in income taxes payable (due to timing associated with payments), partially offset by increases in inventories (due to planned increases in stock levels of certain products primarily in our Endoscope Reprocessing and Healthcare Disposables segments) and prepaid expenses (due to the prepayment of certain operating expenses primarily relating to commissions).

 

In fiscal 2007, net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to net income (after adjusting for depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation expense and deferred income taxes) and an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses (due to increased purchases in July to meet product demand and additional compensation as a result of more personnel, including the additional sales and service personnel of our Endoscope Reprocessing operating segment). These items were partially offset by increases in (i) accounts receivable (due to strong sales in the months of July and June, including sales related to the GE Water Acquisition, and increases in customer prices in our Endoscope Reprocessing operating segment as a result of the direct sales effort) and (ii) inventories (due to planned increases in stock levels of certain products) and decreases in (i) net liabilities of discontinued operations (due to the wind-down of Carsen’s

 

39



 

operations including substantial tax payments that were payable in fiscal 2007) and (ii) income taxes payable (due to timing associated with payments).

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

Net cash used in investing activities was $11,450,000, $18,466,000 and $41,535,000 in fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In fiscal 2009, net cash used in investing activities was primarily for the acquisition of G.E.M, a payment for an acquisition earnout to the former owners of Crosstex and capital expenditures, partially offset by proceeds from the disposal of our building in the Netherlands. In fiscal 2008, net cash used in investing activities was primarily for the acquisitions of DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental, a payment for an acquisition earnout to the former owners of Crosstex and capital expenditures. In fiscal 2007, net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the acquisitions of GE Water and Twist, an earnout payment to the former owners of Crosstex and capital expenditures.

 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

Net cash used in financing activities was $13,820,000 in fiscal 2009, compared with net cash provided by financing activities of $1,882,000 and $21,082,000 in fiscals 2008 and 2007, respectively. In fiscal 2009, net cash used in financing activities was primarily attributable to repayments under our credit facilities and purchases of treasury stock, partially offset by a borrowing under our revolving credit facility and proceeds from the exercises of stock options. In fiscal 2008, net cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to borrowings under our revolving credit facility primarily related to the acquisitions of DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental and proceeds from the exercises of stock options, partially offset by repayments under our credit facilities and purchases of treasury stock. In fiscal 2007, net cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to borrowings under our revolving credit facility related to the acquisition of GE Water, net of debt issuance costs and proceeds from the exercises of stock options, partially offset by repayments under our credit facilities and purchases of treasury stock.

 

Repurchase of shares

 

In May 2008, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of our outstanding Common Stock under a repurchase program commencing on June 9, 2008. Under the repurchase program we repurchased shares from time-to-time at prevailing prices and as permitted by applicable securities laws (including SEC Rule 10b-18) and New York Stock Exchange requirements. The repurchase program had a one-year term that expired on June 8, 2009.

 

The first repurchase under our repurchase program occurred on July 11, 2008. Through July 31, 2008, we completed the repurchase of 90,700 shares under the program at a total average price per share of $9.42. We repurchased an additional 43,847 shares through October 31, 2008 at a total average price per share of $9.17. No additional repurchases were made subsequent to the end of our first quarter ended October 31, 2008. Therefore, at the conclusion of the repurchase program on June 8, 2009, we had repurchased 134,547 shares under the repurchase program at a total average price per share of $9.34.

 

In April 2006, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of our outstanding Common Stock under a repurchase program that expired on April 12, 2007. We repurchased 464,800 shares under that repurchase program at a total average price per share of $14.02. Of the 464,800 shares, 161,800 and 303,000 shares were repurchased during fiscals 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

Restructuring activities

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, our management approved and initiated plans to restructure our Netherlands subsidiary by relocating all of our manufacturing operations from the Netherlands to the United States. This action is part of our continuing effort to reduce operating costs and improve efficiencies by leveraging the existing infrastructure of our Minntech operations in Minnesota. The elimination of manufacturing operations in the Netherlands has led to the end of onsite material management, quality assurance, finance and accounting, human resources and some customer service functions. However, we continue to maintain a strong marketing, sales, service and technical support presence based in the Netherlands to serve customers throughout Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

 

In fiscals 2009 and 2008, we recorded $345,000 and $365,000, respectively, in restructuring expenses, which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations by approximately $0.02 in both years. The cumulative amount of such costs incurred as of July 31, 2009 was $710,000. The restructuring plan has been completed and

 

40



 

therefore we do not expect to incur any additional restructuring costs. The decrease in the total expected restructuring expense estimated at July 31, 2008 compared to actual costs incurred in fiscal 2009 was primarily due to the significant decrease in the value of the euro in relation to the United States dollar. The majority of the restructuring costs are included in our Endoscope Reprocessing segment.

 

The restructuring costs recorded are as follows:

 

 

 

Cost of Sales

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Unsalable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

Inventory

 

Severance

 

Total

 

Severance

 

Other

 

Total

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended July 31, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

$

211,000

 

$

64,000

 

$

275,000

 

$

90,000

 

$

 

$

90,000

 

$

365,000

 

Inventory disposal

 

(96,000

)

 

(96,000

)

 

 

 

(96,000

)

Accrued balance at July 31, 2008

 

115,000

 

64,000

 

179,000

 

90,000

 

 

90,000

 

269,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended October 31, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

10,000

 

129,000

 

139,000

 

132,000

 

 

132,000

 

271,000

 

Paid

 

 

 

 

(88,000

)

 

(88,000

)

(88,000

)

Foreign currency translation

 

(35,000

)

(16,000

)

(51,000

)

(12,000

)

 

(12,000

)

(63,000

)

Accrued balance at October 31, 2008

 

90,000

 

177,000

 

267,000

 

122,000

 

 

122,000

 

389,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended January 31, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

 

37,000

 

37,000

 

25,000

 

12,000

 

37,000

 

74,000

 

Paid

 

 

(226,000

)

(226,000

)

(150,000

)

(12,000

)

(162,000

)

(388,000

)

Foreign currency translation

 

5,000

 

12,000

 

17,000

 

3,000

 

 

3,000

 

20,000

 

Accrued balance at January 31, 2009

 

95,000

 

 

95,000

 

 

 

 

95,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended April 30, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

 

 

 

 

13,000

 

13,000

 

13,000

 

Foreign currency translation

 

5,000

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

5,000

 

Accrued balance at April 30, 2009

 

100,000

 

 

100,000

 

 

13,000

 

13,000

 

113,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended July 31, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

(13,000

)

 

(13,000

)

 

 

 

(13,000

)

Paid

 

 

 

 

 

(13,000

)

(13,000

)

(13,000

)

Inventory disposal

 

(40,000

)

 

(40,000

)

 

 

 

(40,000

)

Foreign currency translation

 

6,000

 

 

6,000

 

 

 

 

6,000

 

Accrued balance at July 31, 2009

 

$

53,000

 

$

 

$

53,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

53,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total restructuring expenses incurred

 

$

208,000

 

$

230,000

 

$

438,000

 

$

247,000

 

$

25,000

 

$

272,000

 

$

710,000

 

 

Since the above costs were recorded in our Netherlands subsidiary, which had been experiencing losses from its operations, tax benefits on the above costs were not recorded. The unsalable inventory was recorded in inventories as part of our inventory reserve and the accrued severance was recorded in compensation payable in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

As part of the restructuring plan, we sold our Netherlands building and land on May 19, 2009 and entered into a lease for 2.5 years with the new owner so we can continue to use the facility as our European sales and service headquarters as well as for warehouse and distribution activity. At July 31, 2008, these assets had a book value of $1,808,000, net of accumulated depreciation, and were included in property and equipment in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The sale of the building and land resulted in a gain of $146,000, which will be amortized over the life of the lease and is recorded in deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities. The rent for the full 2.5 year lease of $325,000 was paid from the sale proceeds and recorded as a prepaid expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

41



 

Discontinued Operations -Termination of Carsen’s Operations

 

On July 31, 2006, Carsen closed the sale of substantially all of its assets to Olympus under an Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of May 16, 2006 among Carsen, Cantel and Olympus. Olympus purchased substantially all of Carsen’s assets other than those related to Carsen’s Medivators business and certain other smaller product lines. Following the closing, Olympus hired substantially all of Carsen’s employees and took over Carsen’s Olympus-related operations (as well as the operations related to the other acquired product lines). The transaction resulted in an after-tax gain of $6,776,000 and was recorded separately on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended July 31, 2006 as gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax. In connection with the transaction, Carsen’s Medivators-related assets as well as certain of its other assets that were not acquired by Olympus were sold to our new Canadian distributor of Medivators products.

 

The purchase price for the net assets sold to Olympus was approximately $31,200,000, comprised of a fixed sum of $10,000,000 plus an additional formula-based sum of $21,200,000. In addition, Olympus paid Carsen 20% of Olympus’ revenues attributable to Carsen’s unfilled customer orders (“backlog”) as of July 31, 2006 that were assumed by Olympus at the closing. Such payments to Carsen were made following Olympus’ receipt of customer payments for such orders and totaled $368,000. In fiscal 2007, the entire $368,000 related to such backlog was recorded as income and reported in income from discontinued operations, net of tax, in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

The $10,000,000 fixed portion of the purchase price was in consideration for (i) Carsen’s customer lists, sales records, and certain other assets related to the sale and servicing of Olympus products and certain non-Olympus products distributed by Carsen, (ii) the release of Olympus’ contractual restriction on hiring Carsen personnel, (iii) real property leases (which were assumed or replaced by Olympus) and leasehold improvements, computer and software systems, equipment and machinery, telephone systems, and records related to the acquired assets, and (iv) assisting Olympus in effecting a smooth transition of Carsen’s business of distributing and servicing Olympus and certain non-Olympus products in Canada. Cantel has also agreed (on behalf of itself and its affiliates) not to manufacture, distribute, sell or represent for sale in Canada through July 31, 2008 any products that are competitive with the Olympus products formerly sold by Carsen under its Olympus Distribution Agreements.

 

The $21,200,000 formula-based portion of the purchase price was based on the book value of Carsen’s inventories of Olympus and certain non-Olympus products and the net book amount of Carsen’s accounts receivable and certain other assets, all at July 31, 2006, subject to offsets, particularly for accounts payable of Carsen due to Olympus.

 

Net proceeds from Carsen’s sale of net assets and the termination of Carsen’s operations were approximately $21,100,000 (excluding the backlog payments) after satisfaction of remaining liabilities and taxes.

 

As a result of the foregoing transaction, which coincided with the expiration of Carsen’s exclusive distribution agreements with Olympus on July 31, 2006, Carsen no longer has any remaining product lines or active business operations.

 

Cash flows attributable to discontinued operations consist solely of net cash used in operating activities of $93,000 and $4,867,000 in fiscals 2008 and 2007, respectively. In fiscal 2008, net cash used in operating activities was due to the payment of Carsen’s remaining liabilities that existed at July 31, 2007, which primarily related to various taxes. In fiscal 2007, net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to the payment of Carsen’s remaining operating costs relating to fiscal 2006, income tax payments and various wind-down costs, partially offset by the collection of the remaining receivables.

 

42



 

Long-term contractual obligations

 

As of July 31, 2009, aggregate annual required payments over the next five years and thereafter under our contractual obligations that have long-term components are as follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Thereafter

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities of the credit facilities

 

$

10,000

 

$

33,300

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

43,300

 

Expected interest payments under the credit facilities (1)

 

1,195

 

119

 

 

 

 

 

1,314

 

Minimum commitments under noncancelable operating leases

 

3,206

 

2,162

 

1,256

 

799

 

660

 

2,977

 

11,060

 

Minimum commitments under noncancelable capital leases

 

53

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

67

 

Deferred compensation and other

 

405

 

406

 

250

 

32

 

33

 

166

 

1,292

 

Employment agreements

 

3,301

 

148

 

138

 

 

 

 

3,587

 

Total contractual obligations

 

$

18,160

 

$

36,149

 

$

1,644

 

$

831

 

$

693

 

$

3,143

 

$

60,620

 

 


(1)   The expected interest payments under the term and revolving credit facilities reflect interest rates of 2.15% and 3.70%, respectively, which were our interest rates on outstanding borrowings at July 31, 2009. Since we expect to modify our credit facilities before the expiration date of our revolving credit facility, as further explained below, the margin applicable to our interest rates on outstanding borrowings may increase during fiscal 2010.

 

Credit facilities

 

In conjunction with the acquisition of Crosstex, we entered into amended and restated credit facilities dated as of August 1, 2005 (the “2005 U.S. Credit Facilities”) with a consortium of lenders to fund the cash consideration paid in the acquisition and costs associated with the acquisition, as well as to modify our existing United States credit facilities. The 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities, as amended, include (i) a six-year $40.0 million senior secured amortizing term loan facility and (ii) a five-year $50.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. Amounts we repay under the term loan facility may not be re-borrowed. Debt issuance costs relating to the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities are recorded in other assets and are being amortized over the life of the credit facilities. Such unamortized debt issuance costs amounted to approximately $587,000 at July 31, 2009.

 

At September 18, 2009, borrowings under the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities bear interest at rates ranging from 0% to 0.50% above the lender’s base rate, or at rates ranging from 0.625% to 1.75% above the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), depending upon our consolidated ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and as further adjusted under the terms of the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities (“EBITDA”). At September 18, 2009, the lender’s base rate was 3.25% and the LIBOR rates applicable to our outstanding borrowings ranged from 0.33% to 3.35%. The margins applicable to our outstanding borrowings at September 18, 2009 were 0.00% above the lender’s base rate and 0.75% above LIBOR. Substantially all of our outstanding borrowings were under LIBOR contracts at September 18, 2009. The majority of such contracts were twelve month LIBOR contracts; therefore, we are substantially protected throughout most of fiscal 2010 from any exposure associated with increasing LIBOR rates. The 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities also provide for fees on the unused portion of our facilities at rates ranging from 0.15% to 0.30%, depending upon our consolidated ratio of debt to EBITDA; such rate was 0.20% at September 18, 2009.

 

In order to protect our interest rate exposure in future years, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement on July 21, 2008 for the two-year period beginning June 30, 2009 and ending June 30, 2011 initially covering $20,000,000 of borrowings under the term loan facility (and thereafter reducing in quarterly $2,500,000 increments consistent with the mandatory repayment schedule of our term loan facility), which caps three-month LIBOR on this portion of outstanding borrowings at 4.25%. This interest rate cap agreement has been designated as a cash flow hedge instrument. The cost of the interest rate cap, which was previously included in other assets, was $148,000. During fiscal 2009, the difference between the interest rate cap agreement’s amortized cost and its fair value was recorded as an unrealized loss and included in accumulated other comprehensive income. In July 2009, the interest rate cap agreement was determined to be ineffective since the interest

 

43



 

rates on substantially all of our outstanding borrowings under our term loan facility were protected under LIBOR contracts substantially below 4.25%. Accordingly, we reclassified the $148,000 change in fair value of the interest rate cap agreement from an unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive income into a recognized loss in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. No further gains or losses relating to this interest rate cap agreement will occur in the future.

 

The 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities require us to meet certain financial covenants and are secured by (i) substantially all of our U.S.-based assets (including assets of Cantel, Minntech, Mar Cor, Crosstex and Strong Dental) and (ii) our pledge of all of the outstanding shares of Minntech, Mar Cor, Crosstex and Strong Dental and 65% of the outstanding shares of our foreign-based subsidiaries. Additionally, we are not permitted to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock without the consent of our United States lenders. As of July 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all financial and other covenants under the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities.

 

On July 31, 2009, we had $43,300,000 of outstanding borrowings under the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities, which consisted of $20,000,000 and $23,300,000 under the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility, respectively. In September 2009, we repaid $2,800,000 under the revolving credit facility and $2,500,000 under our term loan facility reducing our total outstanding borrowings to $38,000,000.

 

The revolving portion of our credit facilities has a termination date of August 1, 2010. Although we may repay a portion of our outstanding borrowings under the revolver throughout fiscal 2010, we do not presently anticipate paying off the revolver in full by its termination date. We are in discussions with our bank syndicate regarding modifications to such facility, including an extension of the termination date, and expect to formally modify the facility before the expiration date. However, since any modification will not be completed until later in fiscal 2010, subsequent to July 31, 2009 we will be required to reclassify the entire outstanding balance of the revolver from long-term to current.

 

Operating leases

 

Minimum commitments under operating leases include minimum rental commitments for our leased manufacturing facilities, warehouses, office space and equipment.

 

Rent expense related to operating leases for fiscal 2009 was recorded on a straight-line basis and aggregated $3,679,000, compared with $3,466,000 and $3,531,000 for fiscals 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

License agreement

 

On January 1, 2007, we entered into a license agreement with a third-party which allows us to manufacture, use, import, sell and distribute certain thermal control products relating to our Specialty Packaging segment.  In consideration, we agreed to pay a minimum annual royalty payable in Canadian dollars each calendar year over the license agreement term of 20 years. In fiscal 2009, the license agreement was modified to reduce the royalty rate and remove the minimum royalty obligation.

 

Deferred compensation

 

Included in other long-term liabilities are deferred compensation arrangements for certain former Minntech directors and officers.

 

Employment agreements

 

We have previously entered into various employment agreements with executives of the Company, including our Corporate executive staff and our subsidiary presidents. The majority of such contracts have expired or will expire in early fiscal 2010. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is actively working on new agreements and has retained a third party consulting firm to provide advice on executive compensation and to assist with this process. In the interim, the Compensation Committee has agreed that in the event the employment of any of these executives is terminated by the Company without cause, the executive will continue to receive his base salary through July 31, 2010.

 

Effective April 22, 2008, our former President and Chief Executive Officer resigned and our Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President was promoted to President. As a result of this resignation, estimated separations benefits and other related costs of approximately $720,000 were recorded in general and administrative expenses during fiscal 2008, all of which was paid in fiscal 2009.

 

44



 

Convertible note receivable

 

In February 2009, we invested an initial $200,000 in a senior subordinated convertible promissory note (the “Note”) issued by BIOSAFE, Inc. (“BIOSAFE”), in connection with BIOSAFE’s grant to us of certain exclusive and non-exclusive license rights to BIOSAFE’s antimicrobial additive. BIOSAFE is the owner of a patented and proprietary antimicrobial agent that is built into the manufacturing of end-products to achieve long-lasting microbial protection on such end-products’ surface. As a result of BIOSAFE’s successful raising of a minimum incremental amount of cash following our investment, we are obligated to invest an additional $300,000 in notes of BIOSAFE, which is expected to occur in the first half of fiscal 2010.

 

The Note accrues interest at a per annum rate of 8% until the maturity date of June 30, 2011 or earlier exercise. The Note is convertible into a newly-created series of preferred stock of BIOSAFE. Interest is payable in shares of BIOSAFE stock, or if a next round of financing does not occur by the maturity date, in cash. If not paid by the maturity date, interest will accrue thereafter at a rate of 12% per annum. In connection with  our investment, we entered into a license agreement with BIOSAFE under which we will pay BIOSAFE a fixed royalty percentage of sales of our products containing BIOSAFE’s antimicrobial formulation. This investment, together with the accrued interest of $7,000, is included within other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 31, 2009.

 

Financing needs

 

At July 31, 2009, we had a cash balance of $23,368,000, of which $8,275,000 was held by foreign subsidiaries. We believe that our current cash position, anticipated cash flows from operations, and the funds available under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to satisfy our cash operating requirements for the foreseeable future based upon our existing operations, particularly given that we historically have not needed to borrow for working capital purposes. At September 18, 2009, $26,700,000 was available under our United States revolving credit facility, which expires on August 1, 2010.

 

Notwithstanding our cash position and revolving credit borrowing availability, under the terms of our credit facilities we are limited to the amount of aggregate purchase price we pay for acquisitions during the duration of the credit agreement without obtaining prior bank approval. As of July 31, 2009, the remaining purchase price available for future acquisitions without obtaining prior bank approval is approximately $2,500,000.

 

Foreign currency

 

In fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, the average value of the Canadian dollar decreased by approximately 13.5% relative to the value of the United States dollar. Additionally, at July 31, 2009 compared with July 31, 2008, the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the value of the United States dollar decreased by approximately 4.4%. The financial statements of our Canadian subsidiaries are translated using the accounting policies described in Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements and therefore are impacted by changes in the Canadian dollar exchange rate. Additionally, changes in the value of the Canadian dollar against the United States dollar affected our results of operations because a portion of our Canadian subsidiaries’ inventories and operating costs (which are reported in the Water Purification and Filtration and Specialty Packaging segments) are purchased in the United States and a significant amount of their sales are to customers in the United States.

 

In fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, the average value of the euro decreased by approximately 8.9% relative to the value of the United States dollar. Additionally, at July 31, 2009 compared with July 31, 2008, the value of the euro relative to the United States dollar decreased by approximately 9.3%. The financial statements of our Netherlands subsidiary are translated using the accounting policies described in Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements and therefore are impacted by changes in the euro exchange rate relative to the United States dollar. Additionally, changes in the value of the euro against the United States dollar and British pound affect our results of operations because a portion of the net assets of our Netherlands subsidiary (which are reported in our Dialysis, Endoscope Reprocessing and Water Purification and Filtration segments) are denominated and ultimately settled in United States dollars or British pounds but must be converted into its functional euro currency. Furthermore, as part of the restructuring of our Netherlands subsidiary, as described in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financials and elsewhere in this MD&A, a portion of the net assets of our United States subsidiaries, Minntech and Mar Cor, are now denominated and ultimately settled in euros or British pounds but must be converted into our functional United States currency.

 

45



 

In order to hedge against the impact of fluctuations in the value of (i) the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar, (ii) the euro relative to the United States dollar and British pound and (iii) the British pound relative to the United States dollar on the conversion of such net assets into the functional currencies, we enter into short-term contracts to purchase Canadian dollars, euros and British pounds forward, which contracts are generally one month in duration. These short-term contracts are designated as fair value hedges. There were three foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate value of $2,962,000 at September 18, 2009, which cover certain assets and liabilities that were denominated in currencies other than our subsidiaries’ functional currencies. Such contracts expired on September 30, 2009. These foreign currency forward contracts are continually replaced with new one-month contracts as long as we have significant net assets at our subsidiaries that are denominated and ultimately settled in currencies other than their functional currencies. Under our credit facilities, such contracts to purchase Canadian dollars, euros and British pounds may not exceed $12,000,000 in an aggregate notional amount at any time. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, as amended, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”), such foreign currency forward contracts are designated as hedges. Gains and losses related to these hedging contracts to buy Canadian dollars, euros and British pounds forward are immediately realized within general and administrative expenses due to the short-term nature of such contracts. In fiscal 2009, such forward contracts partially offset the impact on operations related to certain assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than our subsidiaries’ functional currencies.

 

Changes in the value of the Japanese yen relative to the United States dollar in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, did not have a significant impact upon either our results of operations or the translation of our balance sheet, primarily due to the fact that our Japanese subsidiary accounts for a relatively small portion of consolidated net sales, net income and net assets.

 

Overall, fluctuations in the rates of currency exchange had a favorable impact in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal  2008, upon our net income of approximately $860,000 primarily due to the decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar.

 

For purposes of translating the balance sheet at July 31, 2009 compared with July 31, 2008, the total of the foreign currency movements resulted in a foreign currency translation loss of $2,010,000 in fiscal 2009, thereby decreasing stockholders’ equity.

 

Inflation

 

During fiscal 2008, we experienced unprecedented price increases in certain raw materials due in large part to the rising price of fuel and oil, including chemicals, paper pulp and plastics (resins and bottles), which had a significant adverse impact on our gross margins. Rising fuel and oil prices also had a significant adverse impact on distribution costs related to both the purchasing and delivery of products, which also impacted our gross margins. We implemented price increases for certain of our products, which partially offset these cost increases; however, some of our businesses (primarily the Water Purification and Filtration and Healthcare Disposables segments) were unable to obtain higher selling prices necessary to offset the full impact of such higher costs, which resulted in the loss of gross margin. In fiscal 2009, the cost of certain raw materials and distribution costs decreased compared with fiscal 2008 resulting in improved gross margins, as more fully described in “Results of Operations.”

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we continually evaluate our estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

46



 

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue on product sales is recognized as products are shipped to customers and title passes. The passing of title is determined based upon the FOB terms specified for each shipment. With respect to dialysis, therapeutic, specialty packaging and endoscope reprocessing products, shipment terms are generally FOB origin for common carrier and FOB destination when our distribution fleet is utilized (except for one large customer in dialysis whereby all products are shipped FOB destination). With respect to water purification and filtration and healthcare disposable products, shipment terms may be either FOB origin or destination. Customer acceptance for the majority of our product sales occurs at the time of delivery. In certain instances, primarily with respect to some of our water purification and filtration equipment, endoscope reprocessing equipment and an insignificant amount of our sales of dialysis equipment, post-delivery obligations such as installation, in-servicing or training are contractually specified; in such instances, revenue recognition is deferred until all of such conditions have been substantially fulfilled such that the products are deemed functional by the end-user. With respect to a portion of water purification and filtration product sales, equipment is sold as part of a system for which the equipment is functionally interdependent or the customer’s purchase order specifies “ship-complete” as a condition of delivery; revenue recognition on such sales is deferred until all equipment has been delivered.

 

A portion of our water purification and filtration and endoscope reprocessing sales are recognized as multiple element arrangements, whereby revenue is allocated to the equipment, installation and service components based upon vendor specific objective evidence, which principally includes comparable historical transactions of similar equipment and installation sold as stand alone components, as well as an evaluation of unrelated third party competitor pricing of similar installation.

 

Revenue on service sales is recognized when repairs are completed at the customer’s location or when repairs are completed at our facilities and the products are shipped to customers. With respect to certain service contracts in our Endoscope Reprocessing and Water Purification and Filtration operating segments, service revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual term of the arrangement. All shipping and handling fees invoiced to customers, such as freight, are recorded as revenue (and related costs are included within cost of sales) at the time the sale is recognized.

 

None of our sales contain right-of-return provisions. Customer claims for credit or return due to damage, defect, shortage or other reason must be pre-approved by us before credit is issued or such product is accepted for return. No cash discounts for early payment are offered except with respect to a small portion of our sales of dialysis, healthcare disposable and water purification and filtration products and certain prepaid packaging products. We do not offer price protection, although advance pricing contracts or required notice periods prior to implementation of price increases exist for certain customers with respect to many of our products. With respect to certain of our dialysis, dental, water purification and filtration and endoscope reprocessing customers, volume rebates are provided; such volume rebates are provided for as a reduction of sales at the time of revenue recognition and amounted to $2,461,000, $1,757,000 and $1,449,000 in fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in volume rebates in fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008 is primarily due to new terms in a recently renewed rebate arrangement with a major dental distributor in our Healthcare Disposables segment. Such allowances are determined based on estimated projections of sales volume for the entire rebate periods. If it becomes known that sales volume to customers will deviate from original projections, the volume rebate provisions originally established would be adjusted accordingly.

 

The majority of our dialysis products are sold to end-users; the majority of therapeutic filtration products and healthcare disposable products are sold to third party distributors; water purification and filtration products and services are sold directly and through third-party distributors to hospitals, dialysis clinics, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and other end-users; our endoscope reprocessing products and services are sold primarily to distributors internationally and directly to hospitals and other end-users in the United States; and specialty packaging products are sold to third-party distributors, medical research companies, laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, government agencies and other end-users. Sales to all of these customers follow our revenue recognition policies.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

Accounts receivable consist of amounts due to us from normal business activities. Allowances for doubtful accounts are reserves for the estimated loss from the inability of customers to make required payments. We use historical experience as well as current market information in determining the estimate. While actual losses have historically been within management’s expectations and provisions established, if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate,

 

47



 

resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Alternatively, if certain customers paid their delinquent receivables, reductions in allowances may be required.

 

Inventories

 

Inventories consist of raw materials and finished products which are sold in the ordinary course of our business and are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. In assessing the value of inventories, we must make estimates and judgments regarding reserves required for product obsolescence, aging of inventories and other issues potentially affecting the saleable condition of products. In performing such evaluations, we use historical experience as well as current market information. With few exceptions, the saleable value of our inventories has historically been within management’s expectation and provisions established, however, rapid changes in the market due to competition, technology and various other factors could have an adverse effect on the saleable value of our inventories, resulting in the need for additional reserves.

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

Certain of our identifiable intangible assets, including customer relationships, technology, brand names, non-compete agreements and patents, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which range from 3 to 20 years. Additionally, we have recorded goodwill and trademarks and trade names, all of which have indefinite useful lives and are therefore not amortized. All of our intangible assets and goodwill are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, and goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment at least annually. Our management is primarily responsible for determining if impairment exists and considers a number of factors, including third-party valuations, when making these determinations. In performing a review for goodwill impairment, management uses a two-step process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of the related operating segments by using the average fair value results of the market multiple and discounted cash flow methodologies. The first step is a review for potential impairment, and the second step measures the amount of impairment, if any. In performing our annual review for indefinite lived intangibles, management compares the current fair value of such assets to their carrying values. With respect to amortizable intangible assets when impairment indicators are present, management would determine whether expected future non-discounted cash flows would be sufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets; if not, the carrying value of the assets would be adjusted to their fair value. On July 31, 2009, management concluded that none of our intangible assets or goodwill was impaired.

 

While the results of these annual reviews have historically not indicated impairment, impairment reviews are highly dependent on management’s projections of our future operating results and cash flows (which management believes to be reasonable), discount rates based on the Company’s weighted-average cost of capital and appropriate benchmark peer companies. Assumptions used in determining future operating results and cash flows include current and expected market conditions and future sales forecasts. Subsequent changes in these assumptions and estimates could result in future impairment. Although we consistently use the same methods in developing the assumptions and estimates underlying the fair value calculations, such estimates are uncertain by nature and can vary from actual results. At July 31, 2009, our reporting units that were potentially at risk for impairment were Healthcare Disposables and Specialty Packaging, which had average fair values that exceeded book value by approximately 6% and 11%, respectively. With respect to Healthcare Disposables, such average fair value was determined using future operating and cash flow assumptions that management believes to be conservative, especially in light of more recent market conditions such as the outbreak of the novel H1N1 flu (swine flu), which could have a positive impact on future results of this segment. For all of our remaining reporting units, average fair value exceeded book value by substantial amounts.

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets including property, equipment and other assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. An assessment is made to determine if the sum of the expected future non-discounted cash flows from the use of the assets and eventual disposition is less than the carrying value. If the sum of the expected non-discounted cash flows is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized based on fair value. With few exceptions, our historical assessments of our long-lived assets have not differed significantly from the actual amounts realized. However, the determination of fair value requires us to make certain assumptions and estimates and is highly subjective, and accordingly, actual amounts realized may differ significantly from our estimates.

 

48



 

Warranties

 

We provide for estimated costs that may be incurred to remedy deficiencies of quality or performance of our products at the time of revenue recognition. Most of our products have a one year warranty, although a majority of our endoscope reprocessing equipment in the United States carries a warranty period of up to fifteen months. We record provisions for product warranties as a component of cost of sales based upon an estimate of the amounts necessary to settle existing and future claims on products sold. The historical relationship of warranty costs to products sold is the primary basis for the estimate. A significant increase in third party service repair rates, the cost and availability of parts or the frequency of claims could have a material adverse impact on our results for the period or periods in which such claims or additional costs materialize. Management reviews its warranty exposure periodically and believes that the warranty reserves are adequate; however, actual claims incurred could differ from original estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

On August 1, 2005, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment (Revised 2004)” (“SFAS 123R”) using the modified prospective method for the transition. Under the modified prospective method, stock compensation expense is recognized for any option grant or stock award granted on or after August 1, 2005, as well as the unvested portion of stock options granted prior to August 1, 2005, based upon the award’s fair value. For fiscal 2005 and earlier periods, we accounted for stock options using the intrinsic value method under which stock compensation expense is not recognized because we granted stock options with exercise prices equal to the market value of the shares at the date of grant.

 

Most of our stock option and stock awards (which consist only of restricted stock) are subject to graded vesting in which portions of the award vest at different times during the vesting period, as opposed to awards that vest at the end of the vesting period. We recognize compensation expense for awards subject to graded vesting using the straight-line basis, reduced by estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience.

 

The stock-based compensation expense recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements may not be representative of the effect of stock-based compensation expense in future periods due to the level of awards issued in past years (which level may not be similar in the future), modifications to existing awards and assumptions used in determining fair value, expected lives and estimated forfeitures. We determine the fair value of each stock award using the closing market price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The determination of fair value using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the expected option life (which is determined by using the historical closing prices of our Common Stock), the expected dividend yield (which is expected to be 0%), and the expected option life (which is based on historical exercise behavior). If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of SFAS 123R in future periods, the compensation expense that we would record under SFAS 123R may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

In the normal course of business, we are subject to pending and threatened legal actions. It is our policy to accrue for amounts related to these legal matters if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount of anticipated exposure can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any of these pending claims or legal actions will have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Income Taxes

 

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities also include items recorded in conjunction with the purchase accounting for business acquisitions. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance, if necessary, based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. Although realization is not assured,

 

49



 

management believes it is more likely than not that the recorded deferred tax assets, as adjusted for valuation allowances, will be realized. Additionally, deferred tax liabilities are regularly reviewed to confirm that such amounts are appropriately stated. A review of our deferred tax items considers known future changes in various effective tax rates, principally in the United States. If the effective tax rate were to change in the future, particularly in the United States and to a lesser extent Canada, our items of deferred tax could be materially affected. All of such evaluations require significant management judgments. In fiscal 2009, an increase in our Federal tax rate to 35% as well as recently enacted Canadian federal and New York State statutory tax rate reductions were applied to existing overall deferred income tax liabilities, which resulted in virtually no change in our overall effective tax rates.

 

We record liabilities for an unrecognized tax benefit when a tax benefit for an uncertain tax position is taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, but is not recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements because it does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold that the uncertain tax position would be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority. The majority of such unrecognized tax benefits originated from acquisitions and are based primarily upon management’s assessment of exposure associated with acquired companies. Accordingly, any adjustments upon resolution of income tax uncertainties that predate or result from acquisitions have been recorded as an increase or decrease to goodwill. Subsequent to our August 1, 2009 adoption of  SFAS 141R, the resolution of income tax uncertainties that predate or result from acquisitions will be recognized in our results of operations. Unrecognized tax benefits are analyzed periodically and adjustments are made, as events occur to warrant adjustment to the related liability.

 

Business Combinations

 

Acquisitions require significant estimates and judgments related to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

 

Certain liabilities and reserves are subjective in nature. We reflect such liabilities and reserves based upon the most recent information available. In conjunction with our acquisitions, such subjective liabilities and reserves principally include certain income tax and sales and use tax exposures, including tax liabilities related to our foreign subsidiaries, as well as reserves for accounts receivable, inventories and warranties. The ultimate settlement of such liabilities may be for amounts which are different from the amounts recorded.

 

Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities

 

We recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities, such as costs to terminate a contract, the exit or disposal of a business, or the early termination of a leased property, by recognizing the liability at fair value when incurred, except for certain one-time termination benefits, such as severance costs, for which the period of recognition begins when a severance plan is communicated to employees.

 

Inherent in the calculation of liabilities relating to exit and disposal activities are significant management judgments and estimates, including estimates of termination costs, employee attrition and the interest rate used to discount certain expected net cash payments. Such judgments and estimates are reviewed by us on a regular basis. The cumulative effect of a change to a liability resulting from a revision to either timing or the amount of estimated cash flows is recognized by us as an adjustment to the liability in the period of the change.

 

Although we have historically recorded minimal charges associated with exit or disposal activities, we recorded approximately $345,000 and $365,000 in charges associated with exit or disposal activities in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively, relating to our restructuring plan for our Netherlands manufacturing operations.

 

Other Matters

 

We do not have any off balance sheet financial arrangements, other than future commitments under operating leases and employment and license agreements.

 

50



 

Item 7A.                                                  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

Foreign Currency and Market Risk

 

A portion of our products in all of our business segments are exported to and imported from a variety of geographic locations, and our business could be materially and adversely affected by the imposition of trade barriers, fluctuations in the rates of exchange of various currencies, tariff increases and import and export restrictions, affecting all of such geographies included but not limited to the United States, Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the Far East.

 

A portion of our Canadian subsidiaries’ inventories and operating costs (which are reported in the Water Purification and Filtration and Specialty Packaging segments) are purchased in the United States and a significant amount of their sales are to customers in the United States. The businesses of our Canadian subsidiaries could be materially and adversely affected by the imposition of trade barriers, fluctuations in the rate of currency exchange, tariff increases and import and export restrictions between the United States and Canada. Changes in the value of the Canadian dollar against the United States dollar also affect our results of operations because the net assets of our Canadian subsidiaries are denominated and ultimately settled in United States dollars but must be converted into their functional currency. Additionally, the financial statements of our Canadian subsidiaries are translated using the accounting policies described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Fluctuations in the rates of currency exchange between the United States and Canada had an overall favorable impact in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, upon our net income, despite an unfavorable impact on sales, and an adverse impact upon stockholders’ equity, as described in our MD&A.

 

Changes in the value of the euro against the United States dollar and British pound affect our results of operations because a portion of the net assets of our Netherlands subsidiary (which are reported in our Dialysis, Endoscope Reprocessing and Water Purification and Filtration segments) are denominated and ultimately settled in United States dollars or British pounds but must be converted into its functional euro currency. Furthermore, as part of the restructuring of our Netherlands subsidiary, as described in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financials and elsewhere in this MD&A, a portion of the net assets of our United States subsidiaries, Minntech and Mar Cor, are now denominated and ultimately settled in euros or British pounds but must be converted into our functional United States currency. Additionally, the financial statements of our Netherlands subsidiary are translated using the accounting policies described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Fluctuations in the rates of currency exchange between the euro, the United States dollar and British pound had an overall favorable impact in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, upon our net income, and had an adverse impact upon stockholders’ equity, as described in our MD&A.

 

In order to hedge against the impact of fluctuations in the value of (i) the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar, (ii) the euro relative to the United States dollar and British pound and (iii) the British pound relative to the United States dollar on the conversion of such net assets into functional currencies, we enter into short-term contracts to purchase Canadian dollars, euros and British pounds forward, which contracts are generally one month in duration. These short-term contracts are designated as fair value hedges. There were three foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate value of $3,736,000 at July 31, 2009, which covered certain assets and liabilities that were denominated in currencies other than our subsidiaries’ functional currencies. Such contracts expired on August 31, 2009. These foreign currency forward contracts are continually replaced with new one-month contracts as long as we have significant net assets at our subsidiaries that are denominated and ultimately settled in currencies other than their functional currencies. Under our credit facilities, such contracts to purchase Canadian dollars, euros and British pounds may not exceed $12,000,000 in an aggregate notional amount at any time. In fiscal 2009, such forward contracts were partially effective in offsetting a portion of the impact on operations related to certain assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than our subsidiaries’ functional currencies.

 

The functional currency of Minntech’s Japan subsidiary is the Japanese yen. Changes in the value of the Japanese yen relative to the United States dollar in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, did not have a significant impact upon either our results of operations or the translation of the balance sheet, primarily due to the fact that our Japanese subsidiary accounts for a relatively small portion of consolidated net sales, net income and net assets.

 

51



 

Overall, fluctuations in the rates of currency exchange had a favorable impact on our net income in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, primarily due to the decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar, and an adverse impact upon stockholders’ equity.

 

Interest Rate Market Risk

 

We have a United States credit facility for which the interest rate on outstanding borrowings is variable. Substantially all of our outstanding borrowings are under LIBOR contracts. Therefore, interest expense is affected by the general level of interest rates in the United States as well as LIBOR interest rates.

 

Market Risk Sensitive Transactions

 

We are exposed to market risks arising principally from adverse changes in interest rates and foreign currency.

 

With respect to interest rate risk, our outstanding debt is under our United States credit facilities, described elsewhere in Liquidity and Capital Resources. Such credit facilities consist of outstanding debt with fixed repayment amounts at prevailing market rates of interest, principally under LIBOR contracts ranging from one to twelve months. Therefore, our market risk with respect to such debt is the increase in interest expense which would result from higher interest rates associated with LIBOR. Such outstanding debt under our United States credit facilities was $43,300,000 and $58,300,000 at July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and the average outstanding balance during fiscal 2009 and 2008 was approximately $53,000,000 and $64,000,000, respectively. During fiscals 2009 and 2008, the weighted average interest rate on outstanding debt was 3.94% and 6.48%, respectively. A 100 basis-point increase in average LIBOR interest rates would have resulted in incremental interest expense of approximately $526,000 and $644,000 during fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

However, the weighted average interest rate on our outstanding debt at July 31, 2009 has decreased to 2.52% due to decreases in LIBOR rates as well as the margin applicable to our outstanding borrowings. All of our outstanding borrowings were under LIBOR contracts at July 31, 2009. The majority of such contracts were twelve-month LIBOR contracts entered into in recent months; therefore, we are substantially protected throughout most of fiscal 2010 from any exposure associated with increasing LIBOR rates.

 

We are in discussions with our bank syndicate regarding modifications to our revolving credit facility, including an extension of the termination date, and expect to formally modify the facility before its expiration. Due to current market conditions, a modification of our credit facilities will likely result in an increase of our margins above the lender’s base rate and LIBOR, which may adversely affect our fiscal 2010 results of operations. In addition, depending upon the structure of the modification, we may be required to write-off certain deferred financing costs that are recorded in other assets and are currently being amortized over the life of the credit facilities.

 

Our other long-term liabilities would not be materially affected by an increase in interest rates. We also maintained a cash balance of $23,368,000 at July 31, 2009 which is either maintained in cash or invested in low risk and low return cash equivalents such as short-term guaranteed investment certificates issued by various Canadian banks, Canadian Treasury bills and United States money market funds with leading banking institutions. An increase in interest rates would generate additional interest income for us from these low risk cash equivalents, which would partially offset the adverse impact of the additional interest expense.

 

With respect to foreign currency exchange rates, we are principally impacted by changes in the Canadian dollar, euro and British pound as these currencies relate to the United States dollar. We use a sensitivity analysis to assess the market risk associated with our foreign currency transactions. Market risk is defined here as the potential change in fair value resulting from an adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates.

 

Our Canadian subsidiaries and Netherlands subsidiary have net assets in currencies (principally United States dollars) other than their functional Canadian and Euro currency, which must be converted into its functional currency, thereby giving rise to realized foreign exchange gains and losses. Similarly, our United States subsidiaries have net assets in currencies (principally euros and British pounds) other than their functional United States currency, which must be converted into its functional currency, thereby giving rise to realized foreign exchange gains and losses. Therefore, our Canadian subsidiaries, Netherlands subsidiary and United States subsidiaries are exposed to risk if the value of the Canadian dollar, euro and British pound appreciates relative to the United States dollar. For fiscals 2009 and 2008, a uniform 15% increase in the Canadian dollar, euro and British pound relative to the United States dollar would have resulted in aggregate realized losses (after tax) of approximately $350,000 and $250,000, respectively. However, since certain of our subsidiaries use

 

52



 

foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against the impact of fluctuations of the Canadian dollar, euro and British pound relative to the United States dollar, realized losses relating to the fluctuation of those currencies would be partially offset by gains on the foreign currency forward contracts.

 

In addition to the above, adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates impact the translation of our financial statements. For fiscals 2009 and 2008, a uniform 15% adverse movement in foreign currency rates would have resulted in realized losses (after tax) of approximately $880,000 and $630,000, respectively, due to the translation of the results of operations of foreign subsidiaries (adverse changes would be caused by appreciation of either the Canadian dollar or the euro relative to the United States dollar). However, such a change in foreign currency rates would have resulted in an unrealized gain on our net investment in foreign subsidiaries of $2,648,000 and $4,762,000 in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively. Such an unrealized gain would be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income in our stockholders’ equity. Conversely, if the Canadian dollar and the euro depreciated by 15% relative to the United States dollar, we would have recognized realized gains (after tax) of approximately $880,000 and $630,000 in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively, and unrealized losses of $2,648,000 and $4,762,000 in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively, on our net investment in foreign subsidiaries. However, since we view these investments as long-term, we would not expect such unrealized losses to be realized in the near term.

 

The aggregate adverse impact, net of tax, to our results of operations of a uniform 15% increase in foreign currency exchange rates, as described above, due to both financial statement translation and functional currency conversion would have been $1,230,000 and $880,000 for fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively, partially offset by the affect of our foreign currency forward contracts.

 

Item 8.                    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

 

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is Item 15(a), and the Consolidated Financial Statements and schedule included in this Report.

 

Item 9.                    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 9A.                 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of July 31, 2009. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer each concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were, as of the end of the period covered by this report, effective and designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our SEC reports is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

The management of Cantel Medical Corp. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

(i)                                     pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company,

 

(ii)                                  provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company, and

 

(iii)                               provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or

 

53



 

disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in condition, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures included in such controls may deteriorate.

 

We, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer each concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of July 31, 2009.

 

Our independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, have issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting, which is included below.

 

Changes in Internal Control

 

We have evaluated our internal controls over financial reporting and determined that no changes occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

54



 

Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cantel Medical Corp.

 

We have audited Cantel Medical Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Cantel Medical Corp.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, Cantel Medical Corp. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Cantel Medical Corp. as of July 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ending July 31, 2009 of Cantel Medical Corp. and our report dated October 14, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

 

MetroPark, New Jersey

October 14, 2009

 

55



 

Item 9B.                                                  OTHER INFORMATION.

 

None.

 

PART III

 

Item 10.                                                    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

 

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act in connection with the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant, except for the following:

 

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and other officers and management personnel that is posted on our website, www.cantelmedical.com. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver of, a provision of the Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other officers and management personnel by posting such information on our website.

 

Item 11.                                                    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

 

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act in connection with the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant.

 

Item 12.                                                    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

 

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act in connection with the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant, except for the following:

 

The following table shows, as of July 31, 2009, the number of options or other awards currently outstanding, as well as the number of shares remaining available for grant under our existing option plans. No further grants may be made from the 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan or 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan. For these plans, therefore, the table shows only the number of options outstanding:

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

Nonvested

 

Available

 

Plan

 

Options

 

Restricted Shares

 

for Grant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006 Equity Incentive Plan - Options

 

528,821

 

 

641,750

 

2006 Equity Incentive Plan - Restricted Shares

 

 

226,328

 

124,921

 

1997 Employee Stock Option Plan

 

893,276

 

 

 

1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan

 

83,625

 

 

 

 

 

1,505,722

 

226,328

 

766,671

 

 

Item 13.                                                    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

 

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act in connection with the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant.

 

Item 14.                                                    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

 

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A promulgated under the Exchange Act in connection with the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant.

 

56



 

PART IV

 

Item 15.                                                    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

 

(a)                                  The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009.

 

1.                                  Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

(i)                                     Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

 

(ii)                                  Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 31, 2009 and 2008.

 

(iii)                               Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

(iv)                              Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the years ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

(v)                                 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

(vi)                              Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2.                                  Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules:

 

(i)                                     Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

All other financial statement schedules are omitted since they are not required, not applicable, or the information has been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

 

3.                               Exhibits:

 

2(a) - Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 1, 2005 among Registrant, Crosstex International, Inc. and Frank Richard Orofino, Jr. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2005 8-K [the “August 5, 2005 8-K”].)

 

2(b) - Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 1, 2005 among Registrant, Crosstex International, Inc. and Richard Allen Orofino. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Registrant’s August 5, 2005 8-K.)

 

2(c) - Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 1, 2005 among Registrant, Crosstex International, Inc. and Gary Steinberg. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to Registrant’s August 5, 2005 8-K.)

 

2(d) - Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 1, 2005 among Registrant, Crosstex International, Inc. and Mitchell Steinberg. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.5 to Registrant’s August 5, 2005 8-K.)

 

2(e) - Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2007 between GE Osmonics, Inc. and Mar Cor Purification, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 4, 2007 [the “April 2007 8-K”].)

 

3(a) - Registrant’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated July 20, 1978. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to Registrant’s 1981 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

 

3(b) - Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on February 16, 1982. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to Registrant’s 1982 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

 

57



 

3(c) - Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on May 4, 1984. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(c) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 1984.)

 

3(d) - Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on August 19, 1986. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(d) to Registrant’s 1986 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

 

3(e) - Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on December 12, 1986. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(e) to Registrant’s 1987 Annual Report on Form 10-K [the “1987 10-K”].)

 

3(f) - Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on April 3, 1987. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(f) to Registrant’s 1987 10-K.)

 

3(g) - Certificate of Change of Registrant, filed on July 12, 1988. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(g) to Registrant’s 1988 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

 

3(h) - Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on April 17, 1989. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(h) to Registrant’s 1989 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

 

3(i) – Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on May 10, 1999. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to Registrant’s 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K [the “2000 10-K”].)

 

3(j) – Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on April 5, 2000. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(j) to Registrant’s 2000 10-K.)

 

3(k) – Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on September 6, 2001. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(k) to Registrant’s 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

 

3(l) – Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on June 7, 2002. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(l) to Registrant’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K [the “2002 10-K”].)

 

3(m) – Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed on December 22, 2005. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(m) to Registrant’s 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K [the “2007 10-K”].)

 

3(n) - Registrant’s By-Laws adopted April 24, 2002. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3(m) to Registrant’s 2002 10-K.)

 

10(a) - Registrant’s 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to Annex B to Registrant’s 2004 Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A.)

 

10(b) - Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under Registrant’s 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(t) to Registrant’s 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

 

10(c) - Registrant’s 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, as amended. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(ee) to Registrant’s  2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

 

10(d) - Form of Quarterly Stock Option Agreement under the Registrant’s 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(hh) to Registrant’s 2000 10-K.)

 

10(e) - Form of Annual Stock Option Agreement under the Registrant’s 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(ii) to Registrant’s 2000 10-K.)

 

10(f) – 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to Registrants’ 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K [the “2008 10-K”].)

 

10(g) - Form of Stock Option Agreement under Registrant’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to Registrant’s 2008 10-K.)

 

58



 

10(h) - Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Registrant’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(l) to Registrant’s 2008 10-K.)

 

10(i) - Employment Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2004, between the Registrant and Andrew A. Krakauer. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 30, 2004.)

 

10(j) - Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Craig A. Sheldon. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 21, 2005 [the “January 21, 2005 8-K”].)

 

10(k) - Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Seth R. Segel. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to Registrant’s January 21, 2005 8-K.)

 

10(l) - Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2004, between the Registrant and Steven C. Anaya. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3 to Registrant’s January 21, 2005 8-K.)

 

10(m) - Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2005, between the Registrant and Eric W. Nodiff. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 7, 2005.)

 

10(n) - Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2004, between Minntech Corporation and Roy K. Malkin. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 to Registrant’s January 21, 2005 8-K.)

 

10(o) - Employment Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2006, between Mar Cor Purification, Inc. and Curtis Weitnauer. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(z) to the Registrant’s 2007 10-K.)

 

10(p) - Employment Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2008, between Crosstex International, Inc. and Gary Steinberg. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(t) to Registrant’s 2008 10-K.)

 

10(q) - Letter from Chairman of Compensation Committee to President regarding compensation of executive officers. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(u) to Registrant’s 2008 10-K.)

 

10(r) - Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 1, 2005 among Registrant, Bank of America N.A., PNC Bank, National Association, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (and Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager). (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s August 5, 2005 8-K.)

 

10(s) - First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated April 19, 2006 among Registrant, Bank of America N.A., PNC Bank, National Association, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (and Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager). (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to Registrant’s 2007 10-K.)

 

10(t) - Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated November 17, 2006 among Registrant, Bank of America N.A., PNC Bank, National Association, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (and Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager).  (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to Registrant’s April 30, 2007 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q [the “April 2007 10-Q”].)

 

10(u) - Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated March 29, 2007 among Registrant, Bank of America N.A., PNC Bank, National Association, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (and Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager).  (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to the Registrant’s April 2007 10-Q.)

 

10(v) - Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated May 17, 2007 among Registrant, Bank of America N.A., PNC Bank, National Association, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (and Banc of America Securities LLC, as sole lead arranger and sole book manager).  (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to the Registrant’s April 2007 10-Q.)

 

59



 

10(w) - Letter Agreement dated as of December 18, 2006 between the Company and Andrew A. Krakauer. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2006 [the “December 2006 8-K”].)

 

10(x) - Letter Agreement dated as of December 18, 2006 between the Company and Eric W. Nodiff. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s December 2006 8-K.)

 

10(y) - Letter Agreement dated as of December 18, 2006 between the Company and Seth R. Segel. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s December 2006 8-K.)

 

10(z) - Letter Agreement dated as of December 18, 2006 between the Company and Craig A. Sheldon. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s December 2006 8-K.)

 

10(aa) - Letter Agreement dated as of December 18, 2006 between the Company and Steven C. Anaya. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Registrant’s December 2006 8-K.)

 

10(bb) - Letter Agreement dated as of December 18, 2006 between Minntech Corporation and Roy K. Malkin. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant’s December 2006 8-K.)

 

10(cc) - Product Supply Agreement dated as of March 30, 2007 between GE Osmonics, Inc. and Mar Cor Purification, Inc. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s April 2007 8-K.)

 

21 - Subsidiaries of Registrant.

 

23 - Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

 

31.1 - Certification of Principal Executive Officer.

 

31.2 - Certification of Principal Financial Officer.

 

32 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

60



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.

 

 

 

Date: October 14, 2009

By:

/s/ Andrew A. Krakauer

 

Andrew A. Krakauer, President and Chief

 

Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Craig A. Sheldon

 

Craig A. Sheldon, Senior Vice President,

 

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Steven C. Anaya

 

Steven C. Anaya, Vice President and

 

Controller

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

/s/ Charles M. Diker

 

Date:

October 14, 2009

Charles M. Diker, a Director and Chairman of the Board

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ George L. Fotiades

 

Date:

October 14, 2009

George L. Fotiades, a Director

 

 

 

and Vice Chairman of the Board

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Robert L. Barbanell

 

Date:

October 14, 2009

Robert L. Barbanell, a Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Alan R. Batkin

 

Date:

October 14, 2009

Alan R. Batkin, a Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Joseph M. Cohen

 

Date:

October 14, 2009

Joseph M. Cohen, a Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Mark N. Diker

 

Date:

October 14, 2009

Mark N. Diker, a Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Alan J. Hirschfield

 

Date:

October 14, 2009

Alan J. Hirschfield, a Director

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Andrew A. Krakauer

 

Date:

October 14, 2009

Andrew A. Krakauer, a Director and President & CEO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Bruce Slovin

 

Date:

October 14, 2009

Bruce Slovin, a Director

 

 

 

 

61



 

CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

JULY 31, 2009

 




 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Cantel Medical Corp.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cantel Medical Corp. (and subsidiaries) as of July 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule included in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Cantel Medical Corp. (and subsidiaries) at July 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended July 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Cantel Medical Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated October 14, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

MetroPark, New Jersey

October 14, 2009

 

1



 

CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Share Data)

 

 

 

July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

23,368

 

$

18,318

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,080 in 2009 and $1,021 in 2008

 

30,450

 

30,316

 

Inventories

 

29,200

 

31,802

 

Deferred income taxes

 

1,898

 

1,565

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

3,994

 

2,560

 

Total current assets

 

88,910

 

84,561

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, at cost:

 

 

 

 

 

Land, buildings and improvements

 

19,846

 

20,645

 

Furniture and equipment

 

43,100

 

41,138

 

Leasehold improvements

 

1,690

 

1,443

 

 

 

64,636

 

63,226

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(28,668

)

(25,306

)

 

 

35,968

 

37,920

 

Intangible assets, net

 

37,042

 

41,254

 

Goodwill

 

114,995

 

113,958

 

Other assets

 

956

 

1,497

 

 

 

$

277,871

 

$

279,190

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

$

10,000

 

$

8,000

 

Accounts payable

 

8,948

 

9,723

 

Compensation payable

 

10,431

 

7,175

 

Earnout payable

 

157

 

4,295

 

Accrued expenses

 

6,583

 

6,739

 

Deferred revenue

 

2,819

 

2,920

 

Income taxes payable

 

175

 

70

 

Total current liabilities

 

39,113

 

38,922

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

33,300

 

50,300

 

Deferred income taxes

 

16,378

 

18,503

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

1,964

 

2,753

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share; authorized 1,000,000 shares; none issued

 

 

 

Common Stock, par value $.10 per share; authorized 30,000,000 shares; issued 2009 - 17,883,873 shares, outstanding 2009 - 16,643,727 shares; issued 2008-17,519,581 shares, outstanding 2008 - 16,370,844 shares

 

1,788

 

1,752

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

87,169

 

81,475

 

Retained earnings

 

102,103

 

86,534

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

8,281

 

10,291

 

Treasury Stock, 2009 - 1,240,146 shares at cost; 2008 -1,148,737 shares at cost

 

(12,225

)

(11,340

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

187,116

 

168,712

 

 

 

$

277,871

 

$

279,190

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

2



 

CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

260,050

 

$

249,374

 

$

219,044

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales

 

160,571

 

161,748

 

140,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

99,479

 

87,626

 

79,012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling

 

30,398

 

28,636

 

23,818

 

General and administrative

 

36,998

 

37,013

 

33,507

 

Research and development

 

4,632

 

4,010

 

4,848

 

Total operating expenses

 

72,028

 

69,659

 

62,173

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before interest and income taxes

 

27,451

 

17,967

 

16,839

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

2,639

 

4,631

 

3,508

 

Interest income

 

(144

)

(515

)

(771

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

24,956

 

13,851

 

14,102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes

 

9,387

 

5,158

 

5,998

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

15,569

 

8,693

 

8,104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

 

 

342

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

15,569

 

$

8,693

 

$

8,446

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.96

 

$

0.54

 

$

0.52

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

0.02

 

Net income

 

$

0.96

 

$

0.54

 

$

0.54

 

Diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.94

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.50

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

0.02

 

Net income

 

$

0.94

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.52

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

3



 

CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollar amounts in Thousands, Except Share Data)

Years Ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Other

 

Treasury

 

Total

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Stock,

 

Stockholders’

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

at Cost

 

Equity

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, July 31, 2006

 

15,399,102

 

$

1,615

 

$

69,171

 

$

69,395

 

$

6,715

 

$

(6,091

)

$

140,805

 

 

 

Exercises of options

 

704,185

 

80

 

5,071

 

 

 

 

 

(1,515

)

3,636

 

 

 

Repurchases of shares

 

(161,800

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,215

)

(2,215

)

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

1,482

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,482

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted stock

 

175,000

 

18

 

(18

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax benefit from exercises of stock options

 

 

 

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,137

 

 

 

Translation adjustment, net of $313 in tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,779

 

 

 

1,779

 

$

1,779

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,446

 

 

 

 

 

8,446

 

8,446

 

Total comprehensive income for fiscal 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

10,225

 

Balance, July 31, 2007

 

16,116,487

 

1,713

 

76,843

 

77,841

 

8,494

 

(9,821

)

155,070

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercises of options

 

245,978

 

29

 

1,786

 

 

 

 

 

(664

)

1,151

 

 

 

Repurchases of shares

 

(90,700

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(855

)

(855

)

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

1,961

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,961

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted stock

 

130,500

 

13

 

(13

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cancellation of restricted stock

 

(31,421

)

(3

)

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax benefit from exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

895

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

895

 

 

 

Translation adjustment, net of $363 in tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,797

 

 

 

1,797

 

$

1,797

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,693

 

 

 

 

 

8,693

 

8,693

 

Total comprehensive income for fiscal 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

10,490

 

Balance, July 31, 2008

 

16,370,844

 

1,752

 

81,475

 

86,534

 

10,291

 

(11,340

)

168,712

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercises of options

 

215,730

 

26

 

1,772

 

 

 

 

 

(483

)

1,315

 

 

 

Repurchases of shares

 

(43,847

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(402

)

(402

)

 

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 

 

3,187

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,187

 

 

 

Issuance of restricted stock

 

101,000

 

10

 

(10

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax benefit from exercises of stock options and vesting of restricted stock

 

 

 

 

 

745

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

745

 

 

 

Translation adjustment, net of $352 in tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,010

)

 

 

(2,010

)

$

(2,010

)

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,569

 

 

 

 

 

15,569

 

15,569

 

Total comprehensive income for fiscal 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

13,559

 

Balance, July 31, 2009

 

16,643,727

 

$

1,788

 

$

87,169

 

$

102,103

 

$

8,281

 

$

(12,225

)

$

187,116

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

4



 

CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

15,569

 

$

8,693

 

$

8,446

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

6,217

 

6,058

 

5,347

 

Amortization

 

5,152

 

5,674

 

4,892

 

Stock-based compensation expense

 

3,187

 

1,961

 

1,482

 

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 

549

 

377

 

350

 

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

 

52

 

126

 

25

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(1,955

)

(1,977

)

(2,369

)

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

 

(267

)

(434

)

(706

)

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(185

)

1,189

 

(6,334

)

Inventories

 

2,298

 

(3,343

)

(1,347

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

(1,405

)

(1,052

)

(117

)

Assets of discontinued operations

 

 

 

2,137

 

Accounts payable, deferred revenue and accrued expenses

 

953

 

(378

)

2,623

 

Income taxes payable

 

827

 

1,756

 

(1,118

)

Liabilities of discontinued operations

 

 

(93

)

(7,344

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

30,992

 

18,557

 

5,967

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(4,215

)

(4,983

)

(5,529

)

Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets

 

1,669

 

23

 

61

 

Earnout paid to Crosstex sellers

 

(3,666

)

(3,667

)

(3,667

)

Acquisition of GE Water

 

 

 

(30,506

)

Acquisition of Twist

 

(629

)

(15

)

(1,900

)

Acquisition of DSI

 

 

(1,250

)

 

Acquisition of Strong Dental, net of cash acquired

 

 

(3,711

)

 

Acquisition of Verimetrix

 

 

(4,906

)

 

Acquisition of G.E.M.

 

(4,414

)

 

 

Purchase of convertible note receivable

 

(200

)

 

 

Other, net

 

5

 

43

 

6

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(11,450

)

(18,466

)

(41,535

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Borrowings under revolving credit facilities, net of debt issuance costs

 

3,500

 

15,050

 

30,500

 

Repayments under term loan facility

 

(8,000

)

(6,000

)

(4,000

)

Repayments under revolving credit facility

 

(10,500

)

(7,750

)

(7,500

)

Proceeds from exercises of stock options

 

1,315

 

1,151

 

3,636

 

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

 

267

 

434

 

706

 

Purchase of interest rate cap

 

 

(148

)

 

Purchases of treasury stock

 

(402

)

(855

)

(2,260

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(13,820

)

1,882

 

21,082

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

(672

)

485

 

448

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

5,050

 

2,458

 

(14,038

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

18,318

 

15,860

 

29,898

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

23,368

 

$

18,318

 

$

15,860

 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

5



 

CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

 

1.             Business Description

 

Cantel Medical Corp. (“Cantel”) is a leading provider of infection prevention and control products in the healthcare market, specializing in the following operating segments:

 

·                  Water Purification and Filtration: Water purification equipment and services, filtration and separation products, and disinfectants for the medical, pharmaceutical, biotech, beverage and commercial industrial markets.

 

·                  Healthcare Disposables: Single-use, infection control products used principally in the dental market including face masks, towels and bibs, tray covers, saliva ejectors, germicidal wipes, plastic cups, sterilization pouches and disinfectants.

 

·                  Dialysis: Medical device reprocessing systems, sterilants/disinfectants, dialysate concentrates and other supplies for renal dialysis.

 

·                  Endoscope Reprocessing: Medical device reprocessing systems, disinfectants, enzymatic detergents and other supplies used to clean and high-level disinfect flexible endoscopes.

 

·                  Therapeutic Filtration: Hollow fiber membrane filtration and separation technologies for medical applications. (Included in All Other reporting segment).

 

·                  Specialty Packaging: Specialty packaging and thermal control products, as well as related compliance training, for the transport of infectious and biological specimens and thermally sensitive pharmaceutical, medical and other products. (Included in All Other reporting segment).

 

Most of our equipment, consumables and supplies are used to help prevent or control the occurrence or spread of infections.

 

Cantel had five principal operating companies during fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, Minntech Corporation (“Minntech”), Crosstex International Inc. (“Crosstex”), Mar Cor Purification, Inc. (“Mar Cor”), Biolab Equipment Ltd. (“Biolab”) and Saf-T-Pak Inc. (“Saf-T-Pak”), all of which are wholly-owned operating subsidiaries. In addition, Minntech has three foreign subsidiaries, Minntech B.V., Minntech Asia/Pacific Ltd. and Minntech Japan K.K., which serve as Minntech’s bases in Europe, Asia/Pacific and Japan, respectively.

 

We currently operate our business through six operating segments: Water Purification and Filtration (through Mar Cor, Biolab and Minntech), Healthcare Disposables (through Crosstex), Dialysis (through Minntech), Endoscope Reprocessing (through Minntech), Therapeutic Filtration (through Minntech) and Specialty Packaging (through Saf-T-Pak). The Therapeutic Filtration and Specialty Packaging operating segments are combined in the All Other reporting segment for financial reporting purposes.

 

On March 30, 2007, we purchased certain net assets of GE Water & Process Technologies’ water dialysis business (the “GE Water Acquisition” or “GE Water”), as more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Since the GE Water Acquisition was completed on March 30, 2007, its results of operations are included in our results of operations in fiscals 2009 and 2008 and for the portion of fiscal 2007 subsequent to March 30, 2007. GE Water is included in our Water Purification and Filtration operating segment.

 

On July 9, 2007, we acquired the net assets of Twist 2 It Inc. (“Twist”), as more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Twist acquisition had an insignificant affect on our results of operations in fiscals 2009 and 2008 due to the small size of this business and with respect to fiscal 2007, its inclusion for only a

 

6



 

portion of one month. Twist is included in our Healthcare Disposables operating segment.

 

We acquired certain net assets of Dialysis Services, Inc. (“DSI”) on August 1, 2007 and Verimetrix, LLC (“Verimetrix”) on September 17, 2007, and all of the issued and outstanding stock of Strong Dental Products, Inc. (“Strong Dental”) on September 26, 2007, as more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The acquisitions of DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental had an overall insignificant affect on our results of operations in fiscal 2009 and the portion of fiscal 2008 subsequent to their respective acquisition dates due to the small size of these businesses. Their results of operations are not reflected in fiscal 2007. DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental are included in the Water Purification and Filtration, Endoscope Reprocessing and Healthcare Disposables segments, respectively.

 

On July 31, 2009, we acquired certain net assets of G.E.M. Water Systems Int’l, LLC (“G.E.M.”), as more fully described in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Its results of operations are not included in our results of operations for any of the periods presented, but its net assets are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 31, 2009. G.E.M. will be included in our Water Purification and Filtration segment.

 

Certain items in previously presented financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation of the July 31, 2009 financial statements. These reclassifications relate to income taxes payable and accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

Throughout this document, references to “Cantel,” “us,” “we,” “our,” and the “Company” are references to Cantel Medical Corp. and its subsidiaries, except where the context makes it clear the reference is to Cantel itself and not its subsidiaries.

 

2.             Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

The following is a summary of our significant accounting policies used to prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Cantel and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue on product sales is recognized as products are shipped to customers and title passes. The passing of title is determined based upon the FOB terms specified for each shipment. With respect to dialysis, therapeutic, specialty packaging and endoscope reprocessing products, shipment terms are generally FOB origin for common carrier and FOB destination when our distribution fleet is utilized (except for one large customer in dialysis whereby all products are shipped FOB destination). With respect to water purification and filtration and healthcare disposable products, shipment terms may be either FOB origin or destination. Customer acceptance for the majority of our product sales occurs at the time of delivery. In certain instances, primarily with respect to some of our water purification and filtration equipment, endoscope reprocessing equipment and an insignificant amount of our sales of dialysis equipment, post-delivery obligations such as installation, in-servicing or training are contractually specified; in such instances, revenue recognition is deferred until all of such conditions have been substantially fulfilled such that the products are deemed functional by the end-user. With respect to a portion of water purification and filtration product sales, equipment is sold as part of a system for which the equipment is functionally interdependent or the customer’s purchase order specifies “ship-complete” as a condition of delivery; revenue recognition on such sales is deferred until all equipment has been delivered.

 

A portion of our water purification and filtration and endoscope reprocessing sales are recognized as multiple element arrangements, whereby revenue is allocated to the equipment, installation and service components based upon vendor specific objective evidence, which principally includes comparable historical transactions of similar equipment and

 

7



 

installation sold as stand alone components, as well as an evaluation of unrelated third party competitor pricing of similar installation.

 

Revenue on service sales is recognized when repairs are completed at the customer’s location or when repairs are completed at our facilities and the products are shipped to customers. With respect to certain service contracts in our Endoscope Reprocessing and Water Purification and Filtration operating segments, service revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual term of the arrangement. All shipping and handling fees invoiced to customers, such as freight, are recorded as revenue (and related costs are included within cost of sales) at the time the sale is recognized.

 

None of our sales contain right-of-return provisions. Customer claims for credit or return due to damage, defect, shortage or other reason must be pre-approved by us before credit is issued or such product is accepted for return. No cash discounts for early payment are offered except with respect to a small portion of our sales of dialysis, healthcare disposable and water purification and filtration products and certain prepaid packaging products. We do not offer price protection, although advance pricing contracts or required notice periods prior to implementation of price increases exist for certain customers with respect to many of our products. With respect to certain of our dialysis, dental, water purification and filtration and endoscope reprocessing customers, volume rebates are provided; such volume rebates are provided for as a reduction of sales at the time of revenue recognition and amounted to $2,461,000, $1,757,000 and $1,449,000 in fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in volume rebates in fiscal 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, is primarily due to new terms in a recently renewed rebate arrangement with a major dental distributor in our Healthcare Disposables segment. Such allowances are determined based on estimated projections of sales volume for the entire rebate periods. If it becomes known that sales volume to customers will deviate from original projections, the volume rebate provisions originally established would be adjusted accordingly.

 

The majority of our dialysis products are sold to end-users; the majority of therapeutic filtration products and healthcare disposable products are sold to third party distributors; water purification and filtration products and services are sold directly and through third-party distributors to hospitals, dialysis clinics, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and other end-users; our endoscope reprocessing products and services are sold primarily to distributors internationally and directly to hospitals and other end-users in the United States; and specialty packaging products are sold to third-party distributors, medical research companies, laboratories, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, government agencies and other end-users. Sales to all of these customers follow our revenue recognition policies.

 

Translation of Foreign Currency Financial Statements

 

Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at year-end exchange rates; sales and expenses are translated using average exchange rates during the year. The cumulative effect of the translation of the accounts of the foreign subsidiaries is presented as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Foreign exchange gains and losses related to the purchase of inventories denominated in foreign currencies are included in cost of sales and foreign exchange gains and losses related to the incurrence of operating costs denominated in foreign currencies are included in general and administrative expenses. Additionally, foreign exchange gains and losses related to the conversion of foreign assets and liabilities into functional currencies are included in general and administrative expenses.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

Accounts receivable consist of amounts due to us from normal business activities. Allowances for doubtful accounts are reserves for the estimated loss from the inability of customers to make required payments. We use historical experience as well as current market information in determining the estimate. While actual losses have historically been within management’s expectations and provisions established, if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Alternatively, if

 

8



 

certain customers paid their delinquent receivables, reductions in allowances may be required.

 

Inventories

 

Inventories consist of raw materials and finished products which are sold in the ordinary course of our business and are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. In assessing the value of inventories, we must make estimates and judgments regarding reserves required for product obsolescence, aging of inventories and other issues potentially affecting the saleable condition of products. In performing such evaluations, we use historical experience as well as current market information.

 

Property and Equipment

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Additions and improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repair costs are expensed. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in income. Depreciation and amortization is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets which generally range from 2-15 years for furniture and equipment, 5-32 years for buildings and improvements and the shorter of the life of the asset or the life of the lease for leasehold improvements. The depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $6,217,000, $6,058,000 and $5,347,000, respectively.

 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

Certain of our identifiable intangible assets, including customer relationships, technology, brand names, non-compete agreements and patents, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which range from 3 to 20 years. Additionally, we have recorded goodwill and trademarks and trade names, all of which have indefinite useful lives and are therefore not amortized. All of our intangible assets and goodwill are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, and goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment at least annually. Our management is primarily responsible for determining if impairment exists and considers a number of factors, including third-party valuations, when making these determinations. In performing a review for goodwill impairment, management uses a two-step process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of the related operating segments by using the average fair value results of the market multiple and discounted cash flow methodologies. The first step is a review for potential impairment, and the second step measures the amount of impairment, if any. In performing our annual review for indefinite lived intangibles, management compares the current fair value of such assets to their carrying values. With respect to amortizable intangible assets when impairment indicators are present, management would determine whether expected future non-discounted cash flows would be sufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets; if not, the carrying value of the assets would be adjusted to their fair value. On July 31, 2009, management concluded that none of our intangible assets or goodwill was impaired.

 

While the results of these annual reviews have historically not indicated impairment, impairment reviews are highly dependent on management’s projections of our future operating results and cash flows (which management believes to be reasonable), discount rates based on the Company’s weighted-average cost of capital and appropriate benchmark peer companies. Assumptions used in determining future operating results and cash flows include current and expected market conditions and future sales forecasts. Subsequent changes in these assumptions and estimates could result in future impairment. Although we consistently use the same methods in developing the assumptions and estimates underlying the fair value calculations, such estimates are uncertain by nature and can vary from actual results.

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets including property, equipment and other assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. An assessment is made to determine if the sum of the expected future non-discounted cash flows from the use of the assets and eventual disposition is less than the carrying value. If the sum of the expected non-discounted cash flows is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized based on fair value. With few exceptions, our historical assessments of our long-lived assets have not

 

9



 

differed significantly from the actual amounts realized. However, the determination of fair value requires us to make certain assumptions and estimates and is highly subjective, and accordingly, actual amounts realized may differ significantly from our estimates.

 

Other Assets

 

Debt issuance costs associated with the credit facilities are amortized to interest expense over the life of the credit facilities. In conjunction with the amended and restated credit facilities dated August 1, 2005, as more fully described in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we incurred additional debt issuance costs of approximately $1,426,000, of which $160,000 of third-party costs was recorded in general and administrative expenses during the first three months of fiscal 2006 in accordance with applicable accounting rules. The remaining $1,266,000 of costs is being amortized over the life of the credit facilities. As of July 31, 2009 and 2008, such debt issuance costs, net of related amortization, were included in other assets and amounted to $587,000 and $960,000, respectively.

 

Warranties

 

We provide for estimated costs that may be incurred to remedy deficiencies of quality or performance of our products at the time of revenue recognition. Most of our products have a one year warranty, although a majority of our endoscope reprocessing equipment in the United States carries a warranty period of up to fifteen months. We record provisions for product warranties as a component of cost of sales based upon an estimate of the amounts necessary to settle existing and future claims on products sold. The historical relationship of warranty costs to products sold is the primary basis for the estimate. A significant increase in third party service repair rates, the cost and availability of parts or the frequency of claims could have a material adverse impact on our results for the period or periods in which such claims or additional costs materialize. Management reviews its warranty exposure periodically and believes that the warranty reserves are adequate; however, actual claims incurred could differ from original estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

On August 1, 2005, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment (Revised 2004)” (“SFAS 123R”) using the modified prospective method for the transition. Under the modified prospective method, stock compensation expense is recognized for any option grant or stock award granted on or after August 1, 2005, as well as the unvested portion of stock options granted prior to August 1, 2005, based upon the award’s fair value. For fiscal 2005 and earlier periods, we accounted for stock options using the intrinsic value method under which stock compensation expense is not recognized because we granted stock options with exercise prices equal to the market value of the shares at the date of grant.

 

Most of our stock option and stock awards (which consist only of restricted stock) are subject to graded vesting in which portions of the award vest at different times during the vesting period, as opposed to awards that vest at the end of the vesting period. We recognize compensation expense for awards subject to graded vesting using the straight-line basis, reduced by estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience.

 

The stock-based compensation expense recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements may not be representative of the effect of stock-based compensation expense in future periods due to the level of awards issued in past years (which level may not be similar in the future), modifications of existing awards and assumptions used in determining fair value, expected lives and estimated forfeitures. We determine the fair value of each stock award using the closing market price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The determination of fair value using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the expected option life (which is determined by using the historical closing prices of our Common Stock), the expected dividend yield (which is expected to be 0%), and the expected option life (which is based on historical exercise behavior). If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the application of SFAS 123R in future periods, the compensation expense that we would record under SFAS 123R may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.

 

10



 

Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities

 

We recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities, such as costs to terminate a contract, the exit or disposal of a business, or the early termination of a leased property, by recognizing the liability at fair value when incurred, except for certain one-time termination benefits, such as severance costs, for which the period of recognition begins when a severance plan is communicated to employees.

 

Inherent in the calculation of liabilities relating to exit and disposal activities are significant management judgments and estimates, including estimates of termination costs, employee attrition and the interest rate used to discount certain expected net cash payments. Such judgments and estimates are reviewed by us on a regular basis. The cumulative effect of a change to a liability resulting from a revision to either timing or the amount of estimated cash flows is recognized by us as an adjustment to the liability in the period of the change.

 

Although we have historically recorded minimal charges associated with exit or disposal activities, we recorded approximately $345,000 and $365,000 in charges associated with exit or disposal activities in fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively, relating to our restructuring plan for our Netherlands manufacturing operations.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

In the normal course of business, we are subject to pending and threatened legal actions. It is our policy to accrue for amounts related to these legal matters if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount of anticipated exposure can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any of these pending claims or legal actions will have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Earnings Per Common Share

 

Basic earnings per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year.

 

Diluted earnings per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year plus the dilutive effect of options and nonvested shares using the treasury stock method and the average market price of our Common Stock for the year.

 

Advertising Costs

 

Our policy is to expense advertising costs as they are incurred. Advertising costs charged to expense were $1,483,000, $1,186,000 and $1,032,000 for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Income Taxes

 

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities also include items recorded in conjunction with the purchase accounting for business acquisitions. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance, if necessary, based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the recorded deferred tax assets, as adjusted for valuation allowances, will be realized. Additionally, deferred tax liabilities are regularly reviewed to confirm that such amounts are appropriately stated. A review of our deferred tax items considers known future changes in various effective tax rates, principally in the United States. If the effective tax rate were to change in the future, particularly in the United States and to a lesser extent Canada, our items of deferred tax could be materially affected. All of such evaluations require significant management judgments. In fiscal 2009, an increase in our Federal tax rate to 35% as well as recently enacted Canadian federal and New York State statutory tax rate reductions were applied to existing overall deferred income tax liabilities, which resulted in virtually no change in our overall effective tax rates.

 

11



 

We record liabilities for an unrecognized tax benefit when a tax benefit for an uncertain tax position is taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, but is not recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements because it does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold that the uncertain tax position would be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority. The majority of such unrecognized tax benefits originated from acquisitions and are based primarily upon management’s assessment of exposure associated with acquired companies. Accordingly, any adjustments upon resolution of income tax uncertainties that predate or result from acquisitions have been recorded as an increase or decrease to goodwill. Subsequent to our August 1, 2009 adoption of  SFAS 141R, the resolution of income tax uncertainties that predate or result from acquisitions will be recognized in our results of operations. Unrecognized tax benefits are analyzed periodically and adjustments are made, as events occur to warrant adjustment to the related liability.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the adequacy of our reserves and the estimates used in calculations of reserves as well as other judgmental financial statement items, including, but not limited to: collectability of accounts receivable; volume rebates and trade-in allowances; inventory values and obsolescence reserves; warranty reserves; depreciation and amortization periods; deferred income taxes; goodwill and intangible assets; impairment of long-lived assets; unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions; reserves for legal exposure; stock-based compensation; and expense accruals.

 

Acquisitions require significant estimates and judgments related to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Certain liabilities and reserves are subjective in nature. We reflect such liabilities and reserves based upon the most recent information available. In conjunction with our acquisitions, such subjective liabilities and reserves principally include certain income tax and sales and use tax exposures, including tax liabilities related to our foreign subsidiaries, as well as reserves for accounts receivable, inventories and warranties. The ultimate settlement of such liabilities may be for amounts which are different from the amounts recorded.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162,” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) will become the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. With limited exceptions, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and therefore was adopted by us on August 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 168 had no impact on our financial position or results of operations.

 

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS No. 165 was issued in order to establish principles and requirements for reviewing and reporting subsequent events and requires disclosures of the date through which subsequent events are evaluated and whether the date corresponds with the time at which the financial statements were available for issue (as defined) or were issued. SFAS 165 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 165 did not effect on our financial position or results of operation. In accordance with SFAS 165, the Company performed a review of events subsequent to July 31, 2009 through October 14, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued. Based upon that review, no subsequent events occurred that required updating to our Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.

 

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) 28-

 

12



 

1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1”). FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 amend SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” and require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as for annual financial statements. Additionally, the guidance amends APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” and requires those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The provisions of FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and therefore were adopted on May 1, 2009. As FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1 relate specifically to disclosures, these standards had no impact on our financial position or results of operations.

 

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (“SFAS 161”), which requires enhanced disclosures about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended  (“SFAS 133”) and its related interpretations, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 also requires that objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation and requires cross-referencing within the footnotes. This statement also suggests disclosing the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 and therefore was adopted on February 1, 2009. As SFAS 161 relates specifically to disclosures, this standard had no impact on our financial position or results of operations, but did increase certain disclosures of our hedging activities, as indicated in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS 141R also establishes disclosure requirements that will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combinations. SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations that occur during or after fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and therefore was adopted on August 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141R did not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

 

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Shared-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities” (FSP EITF 03-6-1), which states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and therefore is effective for our first quarter in fiscal 2010. We are currently in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP EITF 03-6-1 on our earnings per share calculation.

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 establishes a definition of fair value, provides a framework for measuring fair value and expands the disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and therefore was adopted on August 1, 2008 with respect to recorded financial assets and financial liabilities. In February 2008, FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, “Effective Date of Statement 157,” was issued which delays the effective date to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. We adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities on August 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our our financial position or results of operations.

 

13



 

3.             Acquisitions

 

Fiscal 2009

 

G.E.M. Water Systems Int’l, LLC

 

On July 31, 2009, we purchased substantially all of the assets, including the building housing its operations, of G.E.M., a private company with pre-acquisition annual revenues of approximately $3,500,000 based in Buena Park, California that designs, installs and services high quality water and bicarbonate systems for use in dialysis clinics, hospitals and other healthcare facilities. The total consideration for the transaction, including transaction costs, was $4,468,000. Such consideration may be adjusted to reflect the final net asset value of the assets purchased, which adjustment is expected to be insignificant.

 

The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities based on estimated fair values as follows:

 

 

 

Preliminary

 

Net Assets

 

Allocation

 

Current assets

 

$

 681,000

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

1,975,000

 

Amortizable intangible assets - customer relationships (9-year life)

 

951,000

 

Non-amortizable intangible assets - trade names (indefinite life)

 

203,000

 

Current liabilities

 

(808,000

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

 3,002,000

 

 

There were no in-process research and development projects acquired in connection with the acquisition. The excess purchase price of $1,466,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is deductible for income tax purposes, has been included in our Water Purification and Filtration reporting segment.

 

The principal reason for the acquisition was the strengthening of our sales and service presence and base of business in California with a significant concentration of dialysis clinics and healthcare institutions.

 

Since the acquisition of G.E.M. occurred on the last day of our fiscal 2009, its results of operations are excluded from fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, but its net assets are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 31, 2009. Pro forma consolidated statements of income data have not been presented due to the insignificant impact of this acquisition.

 

Fiscal 2008

 

Strong Dental Products, Inc.

 

On September 26, 2007, we expanded our product offerings in our Healthcare Disposables segment by purchasing all of the issued and outstanding stock of Strong Dental, a private company with pre-acquisition annual revenues of approximately $1,000,000 that designs, markets and sells comfort cushioning and infection control covers for x-ray film and digital x-ray sensors. The total consideration for the transaction, including transactions costs and assumption of debt, was $4,017,000. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, we agreed to pay additional purchase price up to $700,000 contingent upon the achievement of a specified revenue target over a three year period. As of July 31, 2009, none of the additional consideration had been earned.

 

14



 

The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities based on estimated fair values as follows:

 

 

 

Final

 

Net Assets

 

Allocation

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

 306,000

 

Other current assets

 

140,000

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

Patents (17-year life)

 

144,000

 

Customer relationships (10-year life)

 

650,000

 

Branded products (5-year life)

 

69,000

 

Non-compete agreements (6-year life)

 

30,000

 

Current liabilities

 

(147,000

)

Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities

 

(342,000

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

 850,000

 

 

There were no in-process research and development projects acquired in connection with the acquisition. The excess purchase price of $3,167,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is non-deductible for income tax purposes, has been included in our Healthcare Disposables reporting segment.

 

The principal reasons for the acquisition were to (i) leverage the sales and marketing infrastructure of Crosstex by adding a branded, technologically differentiated, and patent-protected product line, (ii) expand into the rapidly growing area of digital radiography as dentists convert from film to digital x-rays, and (iii) add a new product line that focuses on the dental hygienist community, which product will aid in cross-selling the recently launched Patient’s Choice™ line of Crosstex products.

 

Verimetrix, LLC

 

On September 17, 2007, we expanded our product offerings in our Endoscope Reprocessing (Medivators®) segment by purchasing certain net assets from Verimetrix, a private company with pre-acquisition annual revenues of $2,000,000 that designs, markets and sells the Veriscan™ System, an endoscope leak and fluid detection device. The total consideration for the transaction, including transaction costs, was $4,906,000. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, we agreed to pay additional purchase price up to $4,025,000 contingent upon the achievement of a specified cumulative revenue target over a six year period. As of July 31, 2009, none of the additional consideration had been earned.

 

The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities based on estimated fair values as follows:

 

 

 

Final

 

Net Assets

 

Allocation

 

Current assets

 

$

 948,000

 

Property and equipment

 

146,000

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

Customer relationships (1-year life)

 

165,000

 

Branded products (3-year life)

 

281,000

 

Technology (17-year life)

 

532,000

 

Other assets

 

166,000

 

Current liabilities

 

(415,000

)

Noncurrent liabilities

 

(65,000

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

 1,758,000

 

 

There were no in-process research and development projects acquired in connection with the acquisition. The excess purchase price of $3,148,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is deductible for income tax

 

15



 

purposes, has been included in our Endoscope Reprocessing reporting segment.

 

The principal reasons for the acquisition were to (i) add a technologically advanced product that fits squarely in our existing customer call pattern for Medivators products, (ii) leverage our national, direct hospital field sales force and their in-depth knowledge of the endoscopy market, and (iii) equip our sales force with a broad and comprehensive product line ranging from pre-cleaning detergents, flushing aids and leak testing equipment, to automated disinfection equipment and chemistries.

 

 Dialysis Services, Inc.

 

On August 1, 2007, we purchased the water-related assets of DSI, a company with pre-acquisition annual revenues of approximately $1,200,000 based in Springfield, Tennessee that designs, installs and services high quality water and bicarbonate systems for use in dialysis clinics, hospitals and university settings. The total consideration for the transaction, including transaction costs, was $1,250,000.

 

The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities based on estimated fair values as follows:

 

 

 

Final

 

Net Assets

 

Allocation

 

Current assets

 

$

122,000

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

Customer relationships (4-year life)

 

182,000

 

Non-compete agreements (5-year life)

 

34,000

 

Property and equipment

 

73,000

 

Current liabilities

 

(18,000

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

393,000

 

 

There were no in-process research and development projects acquired in connection with the acquisition. The excess purchase price of $857,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is deductible for income tax purposes, has been included in our Water Purification and Filtration reporting segment.

 

The principal reason for the acquisition was the strengthening of our sales and service presence and base of business in a region with a significant concentration of dialysis clinics and healthcare institutions.

 

The acquisitions of DSI, Verimetrix and Strong Dental are included in our results of operations in fiscal 2009 and the portion of fiscal 2008 subsequent to the respective acquisition dates and excluded from fiscal 2007. These acquisitions had an insignificant effect on our results of operations due to the small size of these businesses. Pro forma consolidated statements of income data for fiscals 2008 and 2007 have not been presented due to the insignificant impact of these acquisitions individually and in the aggregate.

 

Fiscal 2007

 

Twist 2 It Inc.

 

On July 9, 2007, we expanded our product offerings in our Healthcare Disposables segment by purchasing certain assets of Twist, the owner of a unique, patented, disposable prophy angle for the cleaning and polishing of teeth that eliminates the splatter of saliva, blood and other potential infectious matter. The acquired business had pre-acquisition annual revenues of approximately $1,300,000 and was purchased for $1,915,000, including transaction costs. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, we agreed to pay additional purchase price up to $2,043,000 contingent upon the achievement of specified revenue targets over a two year period. For the post acquisition periods ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, additional purchase price of approximately $157,000 and $629,000, respectively, were earned by the sellers  bringing the aggregate earned purchase price to $2,701,000. The additional earnout purchase price for fiscals 2009 and 2008 was reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as additional goodwill and earnout payable at July

 

16



 

31, 2009 and 2008. Additional earnout purchase price is no longer available to the sellers.

 

Due to the small size of this acquisition, it had an insignificant impact on our results of operations in fiscals 2009 and 2008 and virtually no impact on our results of operations for fiscal 2007 since the acquisition occurred during the last month of fiscal 2007. Pro forma consolidated statement of income data for fiscal 2007 has not been presented due to the insignificant impact of this acquisition.

 

The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities based on estimated fair values as follows:

 

 

 

Final

 

Net Assets

 

Allocation

 

Inventories

 

$

 32,000

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

Patents (12-year life)

 

627,000

 

Customer relationships (1-year life)

 

25,000

 

Branded products (12-year life)

 

97,000

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

 781,000

 

 

There were no in-process research and development projects acquired in connection with the acquisition. The excess purchase price of $1,920,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is deductible for income tax purposes, has been included in our Healthcare Disposables reporting segment.

 

The principal reasons for the acquisition were to (i) enter into a sizeable dental disposable niche with a branded, technologically differentiated, and patent-protected product, (ii) expand Crosstex’ recently launched Patient’s Choice™ product line, and (iii) leverage Crosstex’ sophisticated sales and marketing infrastructure in the dental arena.

 

GE Water & Process Technologies’ Dialysis Water Business

 

On March 30, 2007, Mar Cor purchased certain net assets from GE Water & Process Technologies, a unit of General Electric Company, relating to water dialysis. With an installed base of approximately 1,800 water equipment installations in North America and annual pre-acquisition revenues of approximately $20,000,000 (approximately 70% of such revenues were from one customer, Fresenius Medical Care), the GE Water Acquisition expanded our Water Purification and Filtration’s annual business by approximately 50% in terms of sales. Total consideration for the transaction, including transaction costs, was $30,506,000.

 

The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and assumed liabilities based on estimated fair values as follows:

 

 

 

Final

 

Net Assets

 

Allocation

 

Current assets

 

$

 2,030,000

 

Property and equipment

 

150,000

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

Customer relationships (9-year life)

 

4,700,000

 

Branded products (9-year life)

 

400,000

 

Current liabilities

 

(900,000

)

Net assets acquired

 

$

 6,380,000

 

 

There were no in-process research and development projects acquired in connection with the acquisition. The excess purchase price of $24,126,000 was assigned to goodwill. Such goodwill, all of which is deductible for income tax purposes, has been included in our Water Purification and Filtration reporting segment.

 

The reasons for the acquisition were as follows: (i) the opportunity to add an installed equipment base of business into which we can (a) increase service revenue while improving the density and efficiency of the Mar Cor service network and

 

17



 

(b) increase consumable sales per clinic; (ii) the potential revenue and cost savings synergies and efficiencies that could be realized through optimizing and combining the acquired assets (including GE Water employees) into Mar Cor; and (iii) the expectation that the acquisition will be accretive to our future earnings per share.

 

For the four months ended July 31, 2007 since its acquisition on March 30, 2007, GE Water contributed $6,949,000 to our net sales and $2,004,000 to gross profit (inclusive of $56,000 of amortization included within cost of sales related to the step-up in the value of inventories.) Pro forma consolidated statements of income data for fiscal 2007 have not been presented due to the unavailability of pre-acquisition GE Water financial statements, since GE did not maintain separate financial statements related to these purchased assets.

 

4.             Inventories

 

A summary of inventories is as follows:

 

 

 

July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw materials and parts

 

$

 10,980,000

 

$

 12,615,000

 

Work-in-process

 

3,074,000

 

3,544,000

 

Finished goods

 

15,146,000

 

15,643,000

 

Total

 

$

 29,200,000

 

$

 31,802,000

 

 

5.             Financial Instruments

 

We account for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with SFAS 133, which requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. If the derivative is designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative will either be offset against the change in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of a derivative that is designated as a hedge will be recognized immediately in earnings. As of July 31, 2009, all of our derivatives were designated as hedges in accordance with SFAS 133.

 

Changes in the value of (i) the Canadian dollar against the United States dollar, (ii) the euro against the United States dollar and British pound and (iii) the British pound relative to the United States dollar affect our results of operations because a portion of the net assets of our Canadian subsidiaries (which are reported in our Specialty Packaging and Water Purification and Filtration segments) and Minntech’s Netherlands subsidiary (which are reported in our Dialysis, Endoscope Reprocessing and Water Purification and Filtration segments) are denominated and ultimately settled in United States dollars or British pounds but must be converted into its functional Canadian dollar or euro currency. Furthermore, as part of the restructuring of our Netherlands subsidiary, as further described in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, a portion of the net assets of our United States subsidiaries, Minntech and Mar Cor, are now denominated and ultimately settled in euros or British pounds but must be converted into our functional United States currency.

 

In order to hedge against the impact of fluctuations in the value of (i) the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar, (ii) the euro relative to the United States dollar and British pound and (iii) the British pound relative to the United States dollar on the conversion of such net assets into the functional currencies, we enter into short-term contracts to purchase Canadian dollars, euros and British pounds forward, which contracts are generally one month in duration. These short-term contracts are designated as fair value hedge instruments. There were three foreign currency forward contracts with an aggregate value of $3,736,000 at July 31, 2009, which covered certain assets and liabilities that were denominated in currencies other than our subsidiaries’ functional currencies. Such contracts expired on August 31, 2009. These foreign currency forward contracts are continually replaced with new one-month contracts as long as we have significant net assets at our subsidiaries that are denominated and ultimately settled in currencies other than their

 

18



 

functional currencies. Under our credit facilities, such contracts to purchase Canadian dollars, euros and British pounds may not exceed $12,000,000 in an aggregate notional amount at any time. In fiscal 2009, such forward contracts partially offset the impact on operations relating to certain assets and liabilities that were denominated in currencies other than our subsidiaries’ functional currencies. Despite the use of these forward contracts, the functional currency conversion loss recognized in net income relating to these hedging contracts was approximately $200,000, net of tax, in fiscal 2009 and was primarily due to the timing of our cash repatriation from the Netherlands and the weakening of the euro and British pound relative to the United States dollar. Gains and losses related to the hedging contracts to buy Canadian dollars, euros and British pounds forward were immediately realized within general and administrative expenses due to the short-term nature of such contracts. We do not hold any derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

 

The interest rate on outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities is variable and is affected by the general level of interest rates in the United States as well as LIBOR interest rates, as more fully described in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In order to protect our interest rate exposure in future years, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement on July 21, 2008 for the two-year period beginning June 30, 2009 and ending June 30, 2011 initially covering $20,000,000 of borrowings under the term loan facility (and thereafter reducing in quarterly $2,500,000 increments consistent with the mandatory repayment schedule of our term loan facility), which caps three-month LIBOR on this portion of outstanding borrowings at 4.25%. This interest rate cap agreement has been designated as a cash flow hedge instrument. The cost of the interest rate cap, which was previously included in other assets, was $148,000. During fiscal 2009, the difference between the interest rate cap agreement’s amortized cost and its fair value was recorded as an unrealized loss and included in accumulated other comprehensive income. In July 2009, the interest rate cap agreement was determined to be ineffective since the interest rates on substantially all of our outstanding borrowings under our term loan facility were protected under LIBOR contracts substantially below 4.25%. Accordingly, we reclassified the $148,000 change in fair value of the interest rate cap agreement from an unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive income into a recognized loss in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. No further gains or losses relating to this interest rate cap agreement will occur in the future.

 

On August 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157 for our financial assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 establishes a three level fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in valuations, as defined below:

 

Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

 

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

 

As of July 31, 2009, the fair value of the interest rate cap agreement referred to above was zero based on an observable market price applied to the specific terms of the interest rate cap agreement as calculated by a banking institution, and is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

As of July 31, 2009, the fair values of the Company’s assets measured on a recurring basis were categorized as follows:

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Cash and cash equilavents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bank deposits and certificates of deposit

 

$

 11,821,000

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 11,821,000

 

Money markets

 

11,547,000

 

 

 

11,547,000

 

Total cash and cash equilavents

 

$

 23,368,000

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 23,368,000

 

Interest rate cap agreement

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets measured on a reoccuring basis

 

$

 23,368,000

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 23,368,000

 

 

19



 

As of July 31, 2009 and 2008, the carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. We believe that as of July 31, 2009, the fair value of our outstanding borrowings under our credit facilities approximates the carrying value of those obligations since the borrowing rates are comparable to market interest rates.

 

6.             Intangibles and Goodwill

 

Our intangible assets with definite lives consist primarily of customer relationships, technology, brand names, non-compete agreements and patents. These intangible assets are being amortized on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 3-20 years and have a weighted average amortization period of 10 years. Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $5,152,000, $5,674,000 and $4,892,000 for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives and therefore are not amortized consist of trademarks and trade names.

 

The Company’s intangible assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

July 31, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Net

 

Intangible assets with finite lives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

$

 26,977,000

 

$

 (10,592,000

)

$

 16,385,000

 

Technology

 

9,345,000

 

(5,304,000

)

4,041,000

 

Brand names

 

9,546,000

 

(3,798,000

)

5,748,000

 

Non-compete agreements

 

1,863,000

 

(1,223,000

)

640,000

 

Patents and other registrations

 

1,140,000

 

(221,000

)

919,000

 

 

 

48,871,000

 

(21,138,000

)

27,733,000

 

Trademarks and tradenames

 

9,309,000

 

 

9,309,000

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

 58,180,000

 

$

 (21,138,000

)

$

 37,042,000

 

 

 

 

July 31, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Net

 

Intangible assets with finite lives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

$

 28,669,000

 

$

 (10,341,000

)

$

 18,328,000

 

Technology

 

9,622,000

 

(4,602,000

)

5,020,000

 

Brand names

 

9,546,000

 

(2,768,000

)

6,778,000

 

Non-compete agreements

 

2,032,000

 

(1,080,000

)

952,000

 

Patents and other registrations

 

1,134,000

 

(148,000

)

986,000

 

 

 

51,003,000

 

(18,939,000

)

32,064,000

 

Trademarks and tradenames

 

9,190,000

 

 

9,190,000

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

 60,193,000

 

$

 (18,939,000

)

$

 41,254,000

 

 

Estimated annual amortization expense of our intangible assets for the next five years is as follows:

 

Year Ending July 31,

 

2010

 

$

 5,045,000

 

2011

 

4,740,000

 

2012

 

4,275,000

 

2013

 

4,202,000

 

2014

 

4,016,000

 

 

20



 

Goodwill changed during fiscals 2009 and 2008 as follows:

 

 

 

Water

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purification

 

Healthcare

 

 

 

Endoscope

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

and Filtration

 

Disposables

 

Dialysis

 

Reprocessing

 

All Other

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, July 31, 2007

 

$

 36,641,000

 

$

 43,011,000

 

$

 8,155,000

 

$

 6,500,000

 

$

7,766,000

 

$

 102,073,000

 

Acquisitions

 

857,000

 

3,167,000

 

 

3,148,000

 

 

7,172,000

 

Earnout on acquisitions

 

 

4,295,000

 

 

 

 

4,295,000

 

Adjustments primarily relating to income tax exposure of acquisitions

 

(61,000

)

 

(22,000

)

 

(3,000

)

(86,000

)

Foreign currency translation

 

225,000

 

 

 

 

279,000

 

504,000

 

Balance, July 31, 2008

 

37,662,000

 

50,473,000

 

8,133,000

 

9,648,000

 

8,042,000

 

113,958,000

 

Acquisitions

 

1,466,000

 

 

 

 

 

1,466,000

 

Earnout on acquisitions

 

 

157,000

 

 

 

 

157,000

 

Adjustments primarily relating to income tax exposure of acquisitions

 

(38,000

)

 

 

 

 

(38,000

)

Foreign currency translation

 

(244,000

)

 

 

 

(304,000

)

(548,000

)

Balance, July 31, 2009

 

$

 38,846,000

 

$

 50,630,000

 

$

 8,133,000

 

$

 9,648,000

 

$

7,738,000

 

$

 114,995,000

 

 

On July 31, 2009 and 2008, we performed impairment studies of the Company’s goodwill, trademarks and trade names and concluded that such assets were not impaired.

 

7.             Warranties

 

A summary of activity in the warranty reserves follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

 916,000

 

$

 1,033,000

 

Acquisitions

 

10,000

 

28,000

 

Provisions

 

1,345,000

 

1,319,000

 

Charges

 

(1,281,000

)

(1,505,000

)

Foreign currency translation

 

(41,000

)

41,000

 

Ending Balance

 

$

 949,000

 

$

 916,000

 

 

The warranty provisions and charges during fiscals 2009 and 2008 relate principally to the Company’s endoscope reprocessing and water purification products. Warranty reserves are included in accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

8.             Financing Arrangements

 

In conjunction with the acquisition of Crosstex, we entered into amended and restated credit facilities dated as of August 1, 2005 (the “2005 U.S. Credit Facilities”) with a consortium of lenders to fund the cash consideration paid in the acquisition and costs associated with the acquisition, as well as to modify our existing United States credit facilities. The 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities, as amended, include (i) a six-year $40.0 million senior secured amortizing term loan facility and (ii) a five-year $50.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility. Amounts we repay under the term loan facility may not be re-borrowed. Debt issuance costs relating to the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities are recorded in other assets and are being amortized over the life of the credit facilities. Such unamortized debt issuance costs amounted to approximately $587,000 at July 31, 2009.

 

21



 

At July 31, 2009, borrowings under the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities bear interest at rates ranging from 0% to 0.50% above the lender’s base rate, or at rates ranging from 0.625% to 1.75% above the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), depending upon our consolidated ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and as further adjusted under the terms of the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities (“EBITDA”). At July 31, 2009, the lender’s base rate was 3.25% and the LIBOR rates applicable to our outstanding borrowings ranged from 0.63% to 3.35%. The margins applicable to our outstanding borrowings at July 31, 2009 were 0.00% above the lender’s base rate and 0.75% above LIBOR. All of our outstanding borrowings were under LIBOR contracts at July 31, 2009. The majority of such contracts were twelve month LIBOR contracts; therefore, we are substantially protected throughout most of fiscal 2010 from any exposure associated with increasing LIBOR rates. The 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities also provide for fees on the unused portion of our facilities at rates ranging from 0.15% to 0.30%, depending upon our consolidated ratio of debt to EBITDA; such rate was 0.20% at July 31, 2009.

 

The 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities require us to meet certain financial covenants and are secured by (i) substantially all of our U.S.-based assets (including assets of Cantel, Minntech, Mar Cor, Crosstex, and Strong Dental) and (ii) our pledge of all of the outstanding shares of Minntech, Mar Cor, Crosstex and Strong Dental and 65% of the outstanding shares of our foreign-based subsidiaries. Additionally, we are not permitted to pay cash dividends on our Common Stock without the consent of our United States lenders. As of July 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all financial and other covenants under the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities.

 

On July 31, 2009, we had $43,300,000 of outstanding borrowings under the 2005 U.S. Credit Facilities, which consisted of $20,000,000 and $23,300,000 under the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility, respectively. In September 2009, we repaid $2,800,000 under the revolving credit facility and $2,500,000 under our term loan facility reducing our total outstanding borrowings to $38,000,000. The maturities of our credit facilities are described in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

The revolving portion of our credit facilities has a termination date of August 1, 2010. Although we may repay a portion of our outstanding borrowings under the revolver throughout fiscal 2010, we do not presently anticipate paying off the revolver in full by its termination date. We are in discussions with our bank syndicate regarding modifications to such facility, including an extension of the termination date, and expect to formally modify the facility before the expiration date. However, since any modification will not be completed until later in fiscal 2010, subsequent to July 31, 2009 we will be required to reclassify the entire outstanding balance of the revolver from long-term to current.

 

9.             Income Taxes

 

The consolidated effective tax rate from continuing operations was 37.6%, 37.2% and 42.5% for fiscals 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, and reflects income tax expense for our United States and international operations at their respective statutory rates.

 

The provision for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

Current

 

Deferred

 

Current

 

Deferred

 

Current

 

Deferred

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

 9,165,000

 

$

 (1,282,000

)

$

 5,336,000

 

$

 (1,418,000

)

$

 6,117,000

 

$

 (1,503,000

)

State

 

1,610,000

 

(402,000

)

1,081,000

 

(408,000

)

1,422,000

 

(421,000

)

Canada

 

545,000

 

(327,000

)

657,000

 

(306,000

)

937,000

 

(274,000

)

Singapore

 

76,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Netherlands

 

 

 

26,000

 

 

(66,000

)

(96,000

)

Japan

 

2,000

 

 

 

190,000

 

 

(118,000

)

Total

 

$

 11,398,000

 

$

 (2,011,000

)

$

 7,100,000

 

$

 (1,942,000

)

$

 8,410,000

 

$

 (2,412,000

)

 

22



 

The geographic components of income from continuing operations before income taxes are as follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

 23,566,000

 

$

 13,330,000

 

$

 14,745,000

 

Canada

 

1,296,000

 

1,563,000

 

1,969,000

 

Netherlands

 

(285,000

)

(925,000

)

(2,169,000

)

Japan

 

(201,000

)

(133,000

)

(238,000

)

Singapore

 

580,000

 

16,000

 

(205,000

)

Total

 

$

 24,956,000

 

$

 13,851,000

 

$

 14,102,000

 

 

The effective tax rate from continuing operations differs from the United States statutory tax rate (35.0% in 2009, 34.2% in 2008 and 34.3% in 2007) due to the following:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expected statutory tax

 

$

 8,735,000

 

$

 4,737,000

 

$

 4,841,000

 

Differential attributable to foreign operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada

 

(235,000

)

(186,000

)

(13,000

)

Netherlands

 

100,000

 

342,000

 

582,000

 

Japan

 

72,000

 

236,000

 

(37,000

)

Singapore

 

(127,000

)

(6,000

)

70,000

 

State and local taxes

 

785,000

 

443,000

 

642,000

 

Extraterritorial income exclusion

 

 

(20,000

)

(56,000

)

Stock option expense

 

(193,000

)

(101,000

)

(27,000

)

Tax reserve provision

 

 

(58,000

)

(101,000

)

Domestic production deduction

 

(449,000

)

(219,000

)

(86,000

)

Foreign taxes

 

250,000

 

 

 

R&E tax credit

 

(197,000

)

 

 

US taxes paid on foreign dividends

 

243,000

 

 

 

Change in our U.S. Federal tax rate

 

287,000

 

(41,000

)

136,000

 

Other

 

116,000

 

31,000

 

47,000

 

Total income tax expense

 

$

 9,387,000

 

$

 5,158,000

 

$

 5,998,000

 

 

23



 

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities from continuing operations are comprised of the following:

 

 

 

July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

Current deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

 

$

 957,000

 

$

 1,050,000

 

Inventories

 

929,000

 

950,000

 

Accounts receivable

 

385,000

 

268,000

 

Subtotal

 

2,271,000

 

2,268,000

 

Valuation allowance

 

(373,000

)

(703,000

)

 

 

$

 1,898,000

 

$

 1,565,000

 

Non-current deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

$

 597,000

 

$

 716,000

 

Stock-based compensation

 

2,595,000

 

1,419,000

 

Foreign tax credit

 

1,058,000

 

1,964,000

 

Foreign NOLs

 

1,705,000

 

2,207,000

 

Subtotal

 

5,955,000

 

6,306,000

 

Valuation allowance

 

(2,466,000

)

(3,494,000

)

 

 

3,489,000

 

2,812,000

 

Non-current deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

(5,841,000

)

(5,389,000

)

Intangible assets

 

(10,669,000

)

(12,529,000

)

Goodwill

 

(1,565,000

)

(758,000

)

Cumulative translation adjustment

 

(1,767,000

)

(2,119,000

)

Tax on unremitted foreign earnings

 

(25,000

)

(520,000

)

 

 

(19,867,000

)

(21,315,000

)

Net non-current deferred tax liabilities

 

$

 (16,378,000

)

$

 (18,503,000

)

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities have been adjusted for changes in statutory tax rates as appropriate. Such changes only have a significant impact in the United States, and to a lesser extent in Canada, where substantially all of our deferred tax items exist. Such deferred tax items existing in the United States reflect a combined U.S. Federal and state effective rate of approximately 38.1% and 37.7% for fiscals 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

At July 31, 2009, we have no net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) for domestic tax reporting purposes. For foreign tax reporting purposes, our NOLs at July 31, 2009 are approximately $7,864,000. Of this amount NOLs from our Japanese subsidiary total approximately $639,000 and will begin to expire on July 31, 2013 and NOLs from our Netherlands subsidiary total approximately $7,225,000 and will begin to expire on July 31, 2012. During fiscal 2008, we decided to place a full valuation allowance against the NOLs of our Japanese subsidiary. Full valuation allowances have been established for all of the foreign NOLs as we currently believe it is more likely than not that we will not utilize such NOLs.

 

During fiscal 2009, we repatriated dividends of approximately $11,400,000 from our foreign subsidiaries for which we have provided U.S. Federal and state income taxes and foreign withholding taxes. During fiscals 2008 and 2007, no dividends were repatriated from our foreign subsidiaries.

 

In fiscal 2007, Canadian income taxes related to income from discontinued operations had an effective tax rate of approximately 19.9%. This low overall effective tax rate was due to a state refund related to our discontinued operations.

 

We have a deferred tax asset of $1,058,000 related to a foreign tax credit that resulted from a dividend repatriation during fiscal 2006. This foreign tax credit carryover expires on July 31, 2016.  A valuation allowance was established against the foreign tax credit in fiscal 2006.  The valuation allowance decreased by approximately $896,000 from fiscal

 

24



 

2008.  The decrease was mainly attributable to additional foreign source income generated during fiscal 2009 due to the foreign dividend repatriation. As we currently do not expect significant future additional foreign source income, a valuation allowance has been established for this foreign tax credit as we currently believe that it is more likely than not that we will not utilize such foreign tax credits.

 

We decreased our overall valuation allowances during fiscal 2009 by $1,358,000, from $4,197,000 at July 31, 2008 to $2,839,000 at July 31, 2009, primarily due to the decrease in the foreign tax credit valuation allowance.

 

A portion of the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, which relate to our Canadian operations, amounting to approximately $10,385,000 was considered to be indefinitely reinvested at July 31, 2009. Accordingly, no provision has been made for United States income taxes that might result from repatriation of these earnings.

 

On August 1, 2007, we adopted FIN 48, which clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements as well as guidance on de-recognition, measurement, classification and disclosure of tax positions. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operation and resulted in no cumulative effect of accounting change being recorded as of August 1, 2007.  Also, we did not record an increase or decrease to our income taxes payable or deferred tax liabilities related to unrecognized income tax benefits for uncertain tax positions on adoption of FIN 48.

 

We record liabilities for an unrecognized tax benefit when a tax benefit for an uncertain tax position is taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, but is not recognized in our Consolidated Financial Statements because it does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold that the uncertain tax position would be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority. The majority of our unrecognized tax benefits originated from acquisitions. Accordingly, any adjustments upon resolution of income tax uncertainties that predate or result from acquisitions have been recorded as an increase or decrease to goodwill. On August 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS 141R, which requires the resolution of income tax uncertainties that predate or result from acquisitions to be recognized in our results of operations. However, if our unrecognized tax benefits are recognized in our financial statements in future periods, there would not be a significant impact to our effective tax rate due to the size of the unrecognized tax benefits in relation to our income from continuing operations before income taxes. We do not expect such unrecognized tax benefits to significantly decrease or increase in the next twelve months. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

 

 

Unrecognized

 

 

 

Tax Benefits

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized tax benefits on August 1, 2007

 

$

 484,000

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

(57,000

)

Unrecognized tax benefits on July 31, 2008

 

$

 427,000

 

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

(47,000

)

Unrecognized tax benefits on July 31, 2009

 

$

 380,000

 

 

Generally, the Company is no longer subject to federal, state or foreign income tax examinations for fiscal years ended prior to July 31, 2003.

 

Our policy is to record potential interest and penalties related to income tax positions in interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively, in our Consolidated Financial Statements. However, such amounts have been relatively insignificant due to the amount of our unrecognized tax benefits relating to uncertain tax positions.

 

25



 

10.          Commitments and Contingencies

 

Long-term contractual obligations

 

As of July 31, 2009, aggregate annual required payments over the next five years and thereafter under our contractual obligations that have long-term components are as follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,
(Amounts  in thousands)

 

 

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Thereafter

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities of the credit facilities

 

$

 10,000

 

$

 33,300

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 43,300

 

Expected interest payments under the credit facilities (1)

 

1,195

 

119

 

 

 

 

 

1,314

 

Minimum commitments under noncancelable operating leases

 

3,206

 

2,162

 

1,256

 

799

 

660

 

2,977

 

11,060

 

Minimum commitments under noncancelable capital leases

 

53

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

67

 

Deferred compensation and other

 

405

 

406

 

250

 

32

 

33

 

166

 

1,292

 

Employment agreements

 

3,301

 

148

 

138

 

 

 

 

3,587

 

Total contractual obligations

 

$

 18,160

 

$

 36,149

 

$

 1,644

 

$

 831

 

$

 693

 

$

 3,143

 

$

 60,620

 

 


(1)          The expected interest payments under the term and revolving credit facilities reflect interest rates of 2.15% and 3.70%, respectively, which were our interest rates on outstanding borrowings at July 31, 2009. Since we expect to modify our credit facilities before the expiration date of our revolving credit facility, as further explained in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the margin applicable to our interest rates on outstanding borrowings may increase during fiscal 2010.

 

Operating leases

 

Minimum commitments under operating leases include minimum rental commitments for our leased manufacturing facilities, warehouses, office space and equipment.

 

Six of the more significant leases that contain escalation clauses are two building leases for our Water Purification and Filtration business, two building leases for our Healthcare Disposables business and two building leases for our Specialty Packaging business. The two Water Purification and Filtration building leases are for the United States headquarters in suburban Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the Canadian headquarters in suburban Toronto, Ontario. The lease for the Philadelphia building provides for monthly base rent of approximately $16,000 during fiscal 2010 and escalates annually to approximately $18,200 in fiscal 2017 when it expires. The Toronto building lease provides for monthly base rent of approximately $14,500 through fiscal 2010 and escalates to approximately $15,400 in fiscal 2015 when it expires. Both the Philadelphia and Toronto building leases are guaranteed by Cantel. The Healthcare Disposables segment has two significant building leases with escalation clauses that are used for manufacturing and warehousing. One building in Sharon, Pennsylvania was owned by an entity controlled by three of the former owners of Crosstex, two of whom also serve as officers of Crosstex. During fiscal 2009, the entity sold the building to a third party in a transaction under which the buyer made substantial improvements, including the addition of 17,000 square feet to the existing 35,000 square feet, in consideration for Crosstex agreeing to enter into a new lease agreement that provides for increased rental charges. This new lease provides for monthly base rent of approximately $17,900 during fiscal 2010 and escalates annually to approximately $20,600 in fiscal 2024 when it expires. The second building lease in Santa Fe Springs, California provides for monthly base rent of approximately $19,900, and was recently amended to decrease the base rent to approximately $17,700 in fiscal 2010, escalating annually thereafter to approximately $19,300 in fiscal 2015 when it expires. Additionally, our Specialty Packaging segment has two significant building leases with escalation clauses that are used for manufacturing and warehousing. One building lease in Edmonton, Alberta provides for monthly base rent of approximately $7,300 during fiscal 2010 and escalates annually to approximately $7,400 in fiscal 2011

 

26



 

when it expires. The second building lease in Glen Burnie, Maryland provides for monthly base rent of $6,200 during fiscal 2010 and escalates annually to approximately $6,600 in fiscal 2013 when it expires.

 

Rent expense related to operating leases for fiscal 2009 was recorded on a straight-line basis and aggregated $3,679,000 compared with $3,466,000 and $3,531,000 for fiscals 2008 and 2007.

 

License agreement

 

On January 1, 2007, we entered into a license agreement with a third-party which allows us to manufacture, use, import, sell and distribute certain thermal control products relating to our Specialty Packaging segment.  In consideration, we agreed to pay a minimum annual royalty payable in Canadian dollars each calendar year over the license agreement term of 20 years. In fiscal 2009, the license agreement was modified to reduce the royalty rate and remove the minimum royalty obligation.

 

Deferred compensation

 

Included in other long-term liabilities are deferred compensation arrangements for certain former Minntech directors and officers.

 

Employment agreements

 

We have previously entered into various employment agreements with executives of the Company, including our Corporate executive staff and our subsidiary presidents. The majority of such contracts have expired or will expire in early fiscal 2010. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is actively working on new agreements and has retained a third party consulting firm to provide advice on executive compensation and to assist with this process. In the interim, the Compensation Committee has agreed that in the event the employment of any of these executives is terminated by the Company without cause, the executive will continue to receive his base salary through July 31, 2010.

 

Effective April 22, 2008, our former President and Chief Executive Officer resigned and our Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President was promoted to President. As a result of this resignation, estimated separations benefits and other related costs of approximately $720,000 were recorded in general and administrative expenses during fiscal 2008, all of which was paid in fiscal 2009.

 

11.          Stock-Based Compensation

 

The following table shows the income statement components of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales

 

$

 70,000

 

$

 43,000

 

$

 43,000

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling

 

216,000

 

123,000

 

159,000

 

General and administrative

 

2,884,000

 

1,778,000

 

1,258,000

 

Research and development

 

17,000

 

17,000

 

22,000

 

Total operating expenses

 

3,117,000

 

1,918,000

 

1,439,000

 

Stock-based compensation before income taxes

 

3,187,000

 

1,961,000

 

1,482,000

 

Income tax benefits

 

(1,226,000

)

(758,000

)

(490,000

)

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

 

$

 1,961,000

 

$

 1,203,000

 

$

 992,000

 

 

The above stock-based compensation expense before income taxes was recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements as stock-based compensation expense (which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations by $0.12, $0.07 and $0.06 in fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively) and an increase to additional paid-in

 

27



 

capital. The related income tax benefits (which pertain only to stock awards and options that do not qualify as incentive stock options) were recorded as an increase to long-term deferred income tax assets (which are netted with long-term deferred income tax liabilities) or a reduction to income taxes payable, depending on the timing of the deduction, and a reduction to income tax expense.

 

On July 31, 2009, we extended the life of 456,001 fully vested “out-of-the-money” stock options previously awarded to certain executive officers (seven individuals in total) under our 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan. Such options were scheduled to expire within six months after July 31, 2009 and had exercise prices ranging from $17.14 to $22.93, which were greater than the closing price of $15.48 on July 31, 2009, the date the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors authorized the modification. The sole modification was to extend the options’ expiration dates to January 31, 2011. All other terms and conditions of the stock options remain the same. As a result of this modification, approximately $703,000 in additional stock-based compensation expense was recorded in our Consolidated Financial Statements on July 31, 2009, which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.03.

 

Most of our stock option and stock awards (which consist only of restricted shares) are subject to graded vesting in which portions of the award vest at different times during the vesting period, as opposed to awards that vest at the end of the vesting period. We recognize compensation expense for awards subject to graded vesting using the straight-line basis, reduced by estimated forfeitures. At July 31, 2009, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, related to total nonvested stock options and stock awards which are expected to vest was $2,157,000 with a remaining weighted average period of 20 months over which such expense is expected to be recognized.

 

We determine the fair value of each stock award using the closing market price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. Stock awards were not granted prior to February 1, 2007. Such stock awards are deductible for tax purposes and were tax-effected using the Company’s estimated U.S. effective tax rate at the time of grant.

 

A summary of nonvested stock award activity follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Number of

 

Average

 

 

 

Shares

 

Exercise Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonvested stock awards at July 31, 2007

 

175,000

 

$

16.57

 

Granted

 

130,500

 

10.50

 

Canceled

 

(31,421

)

16.25

 

Vested

 

(66,914

)

16.53

 

Nonvested stock awards at July 31, 2008

 

207,165

 

12.81

 

Granted

 

101,000

 

14.59

 

Vested

 

(81,837

)

13.42

 

Nonvested stock awards at July 31, 2009

 

226,328

 

$

13.38

 

 

28



 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions for options granted during fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007:

 

Weighted-Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Black-Scholes Option

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

Valuation Assumptions

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend yield

 

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

Expected volatility (1)

 

0.428

 

0.340

 

0.368

 

Risk-free interest rate (2)

 

1.74

%

2.91

%

4.63

%

Expected lives (in years) (3)

 

4.06

 

3.87

 

4.04

 

 


(1) Volatility was based on historical closing prices of our Common Stock.

(2) The U.S. Treasury rate based on the expected life at the date of grant.

(3) Based on historical exercise behavior.

 

Additionally, all options were considered to be deductible for tax purposes in the valuation model, except for certain incentive options granted under the 1997 Employee Plan and to employees residing outside of the United States. Such non-qualified options were tax-effected using the Company’s estimated U.S. effective tax rate at the time of grant. In fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, the weighted average fair value of all options granted was $5.12, $3.35 and $5.47, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value (i.e. the excess market price over the exercise price) of all options exercised was approximately $1,241,000, $2,361,000 and $7,032,000 in fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The aggregate fair value of all options vested was approximately $1,036,000, $1,475,000 and $648,000 in fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

A summary of stock option activity follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Number of

 

Average

 

 

 

Shares

 

Exercise Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at July 31, 2006

 

2,373,699

 

$

11.98

 

Granted

 

544,000

 

15.34

 

Canceled

 

(264,143

)

17.89

 

Exercised

 

(804,710

)

6.40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at July 31, 2007

 

1,848,846

 

14.55

 

Granted

 

383,250

 

10.95

 

Canceled

 

(186,376

)

16.54

 

Exercised

 

(291,303

)

6.23

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at July 31, 2008

 

1,754,417

 

14.94

 

Granted

 

106,250

 

14.33

 

Canceled

 

(91,653

)

14.82

 

Exercised

 

(263,292

)

6.83

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at July 31, 2009

 

1,505,722

 

$

16.32

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable at July 31, 2007

 

1,252,427

 

$

14.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable at July 31, 2008

 

1,137,624

 

$

16.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exercisable at July 31, 2009

 

1,049,657

 

$

17.86

 

 

As of July 31, 2009, 1,417,373 of the outstanding options had vested or were expected to vest in future periods and had a weighted average exercise price of $16.57.

 

29



 

Upon exercise of stock options or grant of stock awards, we typically issue new shares of our Common Stock (as opposed to using treasury shares).

 

If certain criteria are met when options are exercised or restricted stock becomes vested, the Company is allowed a deduction on its income tax return. Accordingly, we account for the income tax effect on such income tax deductions as additional paid-in capital and as a reduction of income taxes payable. In fiscals 2009 and 2008, options exercised resulted in income tax deductions that reduced income taxes payable by $745,000 and $895,000, respectively.

 

We classify the cash flows resulting from excess tax benefits as financing cash flows on our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Excess tax benefits arise when the ultimate tax effect of the deduction for tax purposes is greater than the tax benefit on stock compensation expense (including tax benefits on stock compensation expense that has only been reflected in past pro forma disclosures relating to fiscal years prior to August 1, 2005) which was determined based upon the award’s fair value.

 

The following table summarizes additional information related to stock options outstanding at July 31, 2009:

 

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remaining

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Remaining

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Number

 

Contractual

 

Average

 

Number

 

Contractual

 

Average

 

Range of Exercise

 

Outstanding

 

Life

 

Exercise

 

Exercisable

 

Life

 

Exercise

 

Prices

 

at July 31, 2009

 

(Months)

 

Price

 

At July 31, 2009

 

(Months)

 

Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$2.27   - $3.44

 

7,875

 

6

 

$

 2.46

 

7,875

 

6

 

$

 2.46

 

$8.23   - $15.86

 

750,196

 

39

 

$

 12.70

 

320,797

 

33

 

$

 13.00

 

$16.24 - $29.49

 

747,651

 

18

 

$

 20.10

 

720,985

 

17

 

$

 20.20

 

$2.27   - $29.49

 

1,505,722

 

28

 

$

 16.32

 

1,049,657

 

22

 

$

 17.86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total  Intrinsic Value

 

$

 2,189,220

 

 

 

 

 

$

 899,711

 

 

 

 

 

 

A summary of our stock award plans follows:

 

2006 Equity Incentive Plan

 

On January 10, 2007, the Company terminated our existing stock option plans and adopted the Cantel Medical Corp. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan provides for the granting of stock options (including incentive stock options), restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights and performance-based awards (collectively “equity awards”) to our employees and non-employee Directors. The 2006 Plan does not permit the granting of discounted options or discounted stock appreciation rights. On January 8, 2009, our stockholders approved the Amendment to the Company’s 2006 Equity Incentive Plan that increased the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the 2006 Plan by 700,000.  The maximum number of shares as to which stock options and stock awards may be granted under the 2006 Plan is 1,700,000 shares, of which 1,200,000 shares are authorized for issuance pursuant to stock options and stock appreciation rights and 500,000 shares are authorized for issuance pursuant to restricted stock and other stock awards.  Options outstanding under this plan:

 

·        were granted at the closing market price at the time of the grant,

·        were granted as stock options that do not qualify as incentive stock options,

·        are usually exercisable in three or four equal annual installments contingent upon being employed by the Company during that period,

·        were granted quarterly on the last day of each of our fiscal quarters to each non-employee director who attended that quarter’s regularly scheduled Board of Directors meeting to purchase 750 shares (100% are

 

30



 

exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant of such options),

·        were granted annually on the last day of our fiscal year to each member of our Board of Directors to purchase 1,500 shares (assuming the individual was still a member of the Board of Directors, 50% are exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant of such options and 50% are exercisable on the second anniversary of the grant of such options),

·        were granted automatically to each newly appointed or elected director to purchase 15,000 shares, and

·        expire five years from the date of the grant.

 

Restricted stock shares outstanding under this plan are restricted solely due to an employment length-of-service restriction which lapses in three equal periods based upon being employed by the Company during that period. At July 31, 2009, options to purchase 528,821 shares of Common Stock were outstanding, and 226,328 nonvested restricted stock shares were issued, under the 2006 Plan. At July 31, 2009, 641,750 shares are available for issuance pursuant to stock options and stock appreciation rights and 124,921 shares are available for issuance pursuant to restricted stock and other stock awards. The 2006 Plan expires on November 13, 2016.

 

1997 Employee Plan

 

A total of 3,750,000 shares of Common Stock was originally reserved for issuance or available for grant under our 1997 Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended, which was terminated on January 10, 2007 in conjunction with the adoption of the 2006 Plan. Options outstanding under this plan:

 

·        were granted at the closing market price at the time of the grant,

·        were granted either as incentive stock options or stock options that do not qualify as incentive stock options,

·        are usually exercisable in three or four equal annual installments contingent upon being employed by the Company during that period, and

·        typically expire five years from the date of the grant.

 

At July 31, 2009, options to purchase 893,276 shares of Common Stock were outstanding under the 1997 Employee Plan. No additional options will be granted under this plan.

 

1998 Directors’ Plan

 

A total of 450,000 shares of Common Stock was originally reserved for issuance or available for grant under our 1998 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, as amended, which was terminated on January 10, 2007 in conjunction with the adoption of the 2006 Plan. Options outstanding under this plan:

 

·        were granted to directors at the closing market price at the time of grant,

·        were granted automatically to each newly appointed or elected director to purchase 15,000 shares,

·        were granted annually on the last day of our fiscal year to each member of our Board of Directors to purchase 1,500 shares (assuming the individual was still a member of the Board of Directors, 50% are exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant of such options and 50% are exercisable on the second anniversary of the grant of such options),

·        were granted quarterly on the last day of each of our fiscal quarters to each non-employee director who attended that quarter’s regularly scheduled Board of Directors meeting to purchase 750 shares (100% are exercisable immediately),

·        have a term of ten years if granted prior to July 31, 2000 or five years if granted on or after July 31, 2000, and

·        do not qualify as incentive stock options.

 

At July 31, 2009, options to purchase 83,625 shares of Common Stock were outstanding under the 1998 Directors’ Plan. No additional options will be granted under this plan.

 

Non-plan options

 

There were no non-plan options outstanding at July 31, 2009.

 

31



 

12.          Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

 

The Company’s comprehensive income for fiscals 2009 and 2008 is set forth in the following table:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

15,569,000

 

$

8,693,000

 

$

8,446,000

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on interest cap, net of tax

 

(93,000

)

 

 

Realized loss on interest cap, net of tax

 

93,000

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation, net of tax

 

(2,010,000

)

1,797,000

 

1,779,000

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

13,559,000

 

$

10,490,000

 

$

10,225,000

 

 

We purchased an interest rate cap agreement at the end of our fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, the difference between the interest rate cap agreement’s amortized cost and its fair value was recorded as a $93,000 unrealized loss, net of tax, and included in accumulated other comprehensive income. In July 2009, this interest cap agreement was determined to be ineffective, as further described in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Accordingly, we reclassified the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the interest rate cap agreement from an unrealized loss in accumulated other comprehensive income into a recognized loss in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

For purposes of translating the balance sheet at July 31, 2009 compared with July 31, 2008, the value of the Canadian dollar and euro decreased by approximately 4.4% and 9.3%, respectively, compared with the value of the United States dollar. The total of these currency movements decreased the accumulated translation adjustment, net of tax, by $2,010,000 during fiscal 2009 to $8,281,000 at July 31, 2009, from $10,291,000 at July 31, 2008.

 

32



 

13.          Earnings Per Common Share

 

Basic earnings per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year.

 

Diluted earnings per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year plus the dilutive effect of Common Stock equivalents using the treasury stock method and the average market price of our Common Stock for the year.

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

15,569,000

 

$

8,693,000

 

$

8,104,000

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

342,000

 

Net income

 

$

15,569,000

 

$

8,693,000

 

$

8,446,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average number of shares outstanding

 

16,287,446

 

16,116,360

 

15,631,143

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dilutive effect of equity awards using the treasury stock method and the average market price for the year

 

193,852

 

255,066

 

522,054

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for diluted earnings per share - weighted average number of shares and Common Stock equivalents

 

16,481,298

 

16,371,426

 

16,153,197

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.96

 

$

0.54

 

$

0.52

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

0.02

 

Net income

 

$

0.96

 

$

0.54

 

$

0.54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.94

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.50

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

0.02

 

Net income

 

$

0.94

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options excluded from weighted average dilutive common shares outstanding because their inclusion would have been antidilutive

 

1,308,140

 

1,324,351

 

1,174,795

 

 

33



 

14.          Repurchase of Shares

 

In May 2008, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of our outstanding Common Stock under a repurchase program commencing on June 9, 2008. Under the repurchase program we repurchased shares from time-to-time at prevailing prices and as permitted by applicable securities laws (including SEC Rule 10b-18) and New York Stock Exchange requirements, and subject to market conditions. The repurchase program had a one-year term that expired on June 8, 2009.

 

The first repurchase under our repurchase program occurred on July 11, 2008. Through July 31, 2008, we completed the repurchase of 90,700 shares under the program at a total average price per share of $9.42. We repurchased an additional 43,847 shares through October 31, 2008 at a total average price per share of $9.17. No additional repurchases were made subsequent to the end of our first quarter ended October 31, 2008. Therefore, at the conclusion of the repurchase program on June 8, 2009, we had repurchased 134,547 shares under the repurchase program at a total average price per share of $9.34.

 

15.          Retirement Plans

 

We have 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plans for the benefit of eligible United States employees. Additionally, our Canadian subsidiaries maintain profit sharing plans for the benefit of eligible employees. Contributions by the Company are both discretionary and non-discretionary and are limited in any year to the amount allowable by tax authorities in the United States or Canada.

 

Aggregate employer contributions recognized under these plans were $1,745,000, $1,315,000 and $1,236,000 for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

16.          Supplemental Cash Flow Information

 

Interest paid was $2,256,000, $4,332,000 and $3,306,000 for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Income tax payments were $10,602,000, $5,774,000 and $10,137,000 for fiscals 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Income tax payments in fiscal 2007 include tax payments relating to the sale of substantially all of Carsen’s assets in fiscal 2006, as further described in Note 19 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

17.                               Information as to Operating Segments and Foreign and Domestic Operations

 

We are a leading provider of infection prevention and control products in the healthcare market. Our products include specialized medical device reprocessing systems for renal dialysis and endoscopy, dialysate concentrates and other dialysis supplies, water purification equipment, sterilants, disinfectants and cleaners, hollow fiber membrane filtration and separation products for medical and non-medical applications, and specialty packaging for infectious and biological specimens. We also provide technical maintenance for our products and offer compliance training services for the transport of infectious and biological specimens.

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”), we have determined our reportable business segments based upon an assessment of product types, organizational structure, customers and internally prepared financial statements. The primary factors used by us in analyzing segment performance are net sales and operating income.

 

Since the GE Water Acquisition was completed on March 30, 2007, the results of operations of GE Water are included in the accompanying Water Purification and Filtration segment information for fiscals 2009, 2008 and the portion of fiscal year 2007 subsequent to the acquisition date.

 

34



 

The Company’s segments are as follows:

 

Water Purification and Filtration, which includes water purification equipment design and manufacturing, project management, installation, maintenance, deionization and mixing systems, as well as hollow fiber filter devices and ancillary products for high-purity fluid and separation applications for healthcare (with a large concentration in dialysis), pharmaceutical, biotechnology, research, beverage, semiconductor and other commercial industries. Additionally, this segment includes cold sterilant products used to disinfect high-purity water systems.

 

One customer accounted for approximately 25% of our Water Purification and Filtration segment net sales and approximately 8% of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 2009.

 

Healthcare Disposables, which includes single-use infection prevention and control products used principally in the dental market such as face masks, patient towels and bibs, self-sealing sterilization pouches, tray covers, sterilization packaging accessories, surface barriers including eyewear, aprons and gowns, disinfectants, germicidal wipes, hand care products, gloves, sponges, cotton products, cups, needles and syringes, scalpels and blades, and saliva evacuators and ejectors.

 

Four customers collectively accounted for approximately 55% of our Healthcare Disposables segment net sales and approximately 14% of our consolidated net sales in fiscal 2009.

 

Dialysis, which includes disinfection/sterilization reprocessing equipment, sterilants, supplies and concentrates related to hemodialysis treatment of patients with acute kidney failure or chronic kidney failure associated with end-stage renal disease. Additionally, this segment includes technical maintenance service on its products.

 

Three customers collectively accounted for approximately 50% of our Dialysis segment net sales and approximately 19% of our consolidated net sales, including one customer that accounted for approximately 30% of our Dialysis segment net sales and approximately 8% of our consolidated net sales, in fiscal 2009.

 

Endoscope Reprocessing, which includes endoscope disinfection equipment and related accessories, disinfectants and supplies that are sold to hospitals, clinics and physicians. Additionally, this segment includes technical maintenance service on its products.

 

All Other

 

In accordance with quantitative thresholds established by SFAS 131, we have combined the Therapeutic Filtration and Specialty Packaging operating segments into the All Other reporting segment.

 

Therapeutic Filtration, which includes hollow fiber filter devices and ancillary products for use in medical applications that are sold to biotech manufacturers and third-party distributors.

 

Specialty Packaging, which includes specialty packaging and thermal control products, as well as related compliance training, for the safe transport of infectious and biological specimens and thermally sensitive pharmaceutical, medical and other products.

 

The operating segments follow the same accounting policies used for our Consolidated Financial Statements as described in Note 2.

 

35



 

Information as to operating segments is summarized below:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water Purification and Filtration

 

$

71,340,000

 

$

68,589,000

 

$

49,032,000

 

Healthcare Disposables

 

64,085,000

 

58,657,000

 

57,610,000

 

Dialysis

 

56,414,000

 

60,075,000

 

58,696,000

 

Endoscope Reprocessing

 

52,333,000

 

46,924,000

 

38,941,000

 

All Other

 

15,878,000

 

15,129,000

 

14,765,000

 

Total

 

$

260,050,000

 

$

249,374,000

 

$

219,044,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water Purification and Filtration

 

$

6,374,000

 

$

5,482,000

 

$

4,414,000

 

Healthcare Disposables

 

9,489,000

 

7,357,000

 

8,753,000

 

Dialysis

 

10,679,000

 

8,620,000

 

8,117,000

 

Endoscope Reprocessing

 

5,927,000

 

1,281,000

 

(509,000

)

All Other

 

3,569,000

 

3,443,000

 

3,293,000

 

 

 

36,038,000

 

26,183,000

 

24,068,000

 

General corporate expenses

 

(8,587,000

)

(8,216,000

)

(7,229,000

)

Interest expense, net

 

(2,495,000

)

(4,116,000

)

(2,737,000

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

24,956,000

 

$

13,851,000

 

$

14,102,000

 

 

36



 

 

 

July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identifiable assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water Purification and Filtration

 

$

73,665,000

 

$

72,598,000

 

$

71,638,000

 

Healthcare Disposables

 

100,279,000

 

104,377,000

 

98,933,000

 

Dialysis

 

29,622,000

 

32,536,000

 

32,545,000

 

Endoscope Reprocessing

 

33,379,000

 

31,546,000

 

25,744,000

 

All Other

 

16,545,000

 

18,359,000

 

17,950,000

 

General corporate, including cash and cash equivalents

 

24,381,000

 

19,774,000

 

16,861,000

 

Total

 

$

277,871,000

 

$

279,190,000

 

$

263,671,000

 

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

Capital expenditures:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water Purification and Filtration

 

$

1,301,000

 

$

1,507,000

 

$

2,530,000

 

Healthcare Disposables

 

1,071,000

 

952,000

 

1,437,000

 

Dialysis

 

853,000

 

1,429,000

 

708,000

 

Endoscope Reprocessing

 

801,000

 

869,000

 

575,000

 

All Other

 

187,000

 

201,000

 

269,000

 

General corporate

 

2,000

 

25,000

 

10,000

 

Total

 

$

4,215,000

 

$

4,983,000

 

$

5,529,000

 

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

Depreciation and amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water Purification and Filtration

 

$

2,366,000

 

$

2,346,000

 

$

1,680,000

 

Healthcare Disposables

 

5,490,000

 

5,375,000

 

4,990,000

 

Dialysis

 

1,482,000

 

1,617,000

 

1,711,000

 

Endoscope Reprocessing

 

1,188,000

 

1,458,000

 

839,000

 

All Other

 

806,000

 

899,000

 

979,000

 

General corporate

 

37,000

 

37,000

 

40,000

 

Total

 

$

11,369,000

 

$

11,732,000

 

$

10,239,000

 

 

37



 

Information as to geographic areas (including net sales which represent the geographic area from which the Company derives its net sales from external customers) is summarized below:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

214,909,000

 

$

203,087,000

 

$

179,540,000

 

Canada

 

10,476,000

 

11,217,000

 

10,246,000

 

Asia/Pacific

 

11,103,000

 

10,247,000

 

8,691,000

 

Europe/Africa/Middle East

 

13,366,000

 

15,905,000

 

12,604,000

 

Latin America/South America

 

10,196,000

 

8,918,000

 

7,963,000

 

Total

 

$

260,050,000

 

$

249,374,000

 

$

219,044,000

 

 

 

 

July 31,

 

 

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

Total long-lived assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

35,398,000

 

$

35,698,000

 

$

36,504,000

 

Canada

 

1,219,000

 

1,435,000

 

1,524,000

 

Asia/Pacific

 

170,000

 

122,000

 

120,000

 

Europe

 

137,000

 

2,162,000

 

2,104,000

 

Total

 

36,924,000

 

39,417,000

 

40,252,000

 

Goodwill and intangible assets

 

152,037,000

 

155,212,000

 

146,688,000

 

Total

 

$

188,961,000

 

$

194,629,000

 

$

186,940,000

 

 

18.          Restructuring Activities

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, our management approved and initiated plans to restructure our Netherlands subsidiary by relocating all of our manufacturing operations from the Netherlands to the United States. This action is part of our continuing effort to reduce operating costs and improve efficiencies by leveraging the existing infrastructure of our Minntech operations in Minnesota. The elimination of manufacturing operations in the Netherlands has led to the end of onsite material management, quality assurance, finance and accounting, human resources and some customer service functions. However, we continue to maintain a strong marketing, sales, service and technical support presence based in the Netherlands to serve customers throughout Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

 

In fiscals 2009 and 2008, we recorded $345,000 and $365,000, respectively, in restructuring expenses, which decreased both basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations by approximately $0.02 in both years. The cumulative amount of such costs incurred as of July 31, 2009 was $710,000. The restructuring plan has been completed and therefore we do not expect to incur any additional restructuring costs. The decrease in the total expected restructuring expense estimated at July 31, 2008 compared to actual costs incurred in fiscal 2009 was primarily due to the significant decrease in the value of the euro in relation to the United States dollar. The majority of the restructuring costs are included in our Endoscope Reprocessing segment.

 

38



 

The restructuring costs recorded are as follows:

 

 

 

Cost of Sales

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Unsalable
Inventory

 

Severance

 

Total

 

Severance

 

Other

 

Total

 

Aggregate
Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended July 31, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

$

211,000

 

$

64,000

 

$

275,000

 

$

90,000

 

$

 

$

90,000

 

$

365,000

 

Inventory disposal

 

(96,000

)

 

(96,000

)

 

 

 

(96,000

)

Accrued balance at July 31, 2008

 

115,000

 

64,000

 

179,000

 

90,000

 

 

90,000

 

269,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended October 31, 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

10,000

 

129,000

 

139,000

 

132,000

 

 

132,000

 

271,000

 

Paid

 

 

 

 

(88,000

)

 

(88,000

)

(88,000

)

Foreign currency translation

 

(35,000

)

(16,000

)

(51,000

)

(12,000

)

 

(12,000

)

(63,000

)

Accrued balance at October 31, 2008

 

90,000

 

177,000

 

267,000

 

122,000

 

 

122,000

 

389,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended January 31, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

 

37,000

 

37,000

 

25,000

 

12,000

 

37,000

 

74,000

 

Paid

 

 

(226,000

)

(226,000

)

(150,000

)

(12,000

)

(162,000

)

(388,000

)

Foreign currency translation

 

5,000

 

12,000

 

17,000

 

3,000

 

 

3,000

 

20,000

 

Accrued balance at January 31, 2009

 

95,000

 

 

95,000

 

 

 

 

95,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended April 30, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

 

 

 

 

13,000

 

13,000

 

13,000

 

Foreign currency translation

 

5,000

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

5,000

 

Accrued balance at April 30, 2009

 

100,000

 

 

100,000

 

 

13,000

 

13,000

 

113,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three months ended July 31, 2009:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense

 

(13,000

)

 

(13,000

)

 

 

 

(13,000

)

Paid

 

 

 

 

 

(13,000

)

(13,000

)

(13,000

)

Inventory disposal

 

(40,000

)

 

(40,000

)

 

 

 

(40,000

)

Foreign currency translation

 

6,000

 

 

6,000

 

 

 

 

6,000

 

Accrued balance at July 31, 2009

 

$

53,000

 

$

 

$

53,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

53,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total restructuring expenses incurred

 

$

208,000

 

$

230,000

 

$

438,000

 

$

247,000

 

$

25,000

 

$

272,000

 

$

710,000

 

 

Since the above costs were recorded in our Netherlands subsidiary, which had been experiencing losses from its operations, tax benefits on the above costs were not recorded. The unsalable inventory was recorded in inventories as part of our inventory reserve and the accrued severance was recorded in compensation payable in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

As part of the restructuring plan, we sold our Netherlands building and land on May 19, 2009 and entered into a lease for 2.5 years with the new owner so we can continue to use the facility as our European sales and service headquarters as well as for warehouse and distribution activity. At July 31, 2008, these assets had a book value of $1,808,000, net of accumulated depreciation, and were included in property and equipment in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. The sale of the building and land resulted in a gain of $146,000, which will be amortized over the life of the lease and is recorded in deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities. The rent for the full 2.5 year lease of $325,000 was paid from the sale proceeds and recorded as a prepaid expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

39



 

19.          Discontinued Operations

 

On July 31, 2006, Carsen closed the sale of substantially all of its assets to Olympus under an Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of May 16, 2006 among Carsen, Cantel and Olympus. Olympus purchased substantially all of Carsen’s assets other than those related to Carsen’s Medivators business and certain other smaller product lines. Following the closing, Olympus hired substantially all of Carsen’s employees and took over Carsen’s Olympus-related operations (as well as the operations related to the other acquired product lines). The transaction resulted in an after-tax gain of $6,776,000 and was recorded separately on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended July 31, 2006 as gain on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax. In connection with the transaction, Carsen’s Medivators-related assets as well as certain of its other assets that were not acquired by Olympus were sold to our new Canadian distributor of Medivators products.

 

The purchase price for the net assets sold to Olympus was approximately $31,200,000, comprised of a fixed sum of $10,000,000 plus an additional formula-based sum of $21,200,000. In addition, Olympus paid Carsen 20% of Olympus’ revenues attributable to Carsen’s unfilled customer orders (“backlog”) as of July 31, 2006 that were assumed by Olympus at the closing. Such payments to Carsen were made following Olympus’ receipt of customer payments for such orders and totaled $368,000. In fiscal 2007, the entire $368,000 related to such backlog was recorded as income and reported in income from discontinued operations, net of tax, in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

The $10,000,000 fixed portion of the purchase price was in consideration for (i) Carsen’s customer lists, sales records, and certain other assets related to the sale and servicing of Olympus products and certain non-Olympus products distributed by Carsen, (ii) the release of Olympus’ contractual restriction on hiring Carsen personnel, (iii) real property leases (which were assumed or replaced by Olympus) and leasehold improvements, computer and software systems, equipment and machinery, telephone systems, and records related to the acquired assets, and (iv) assisting Olympus in effecting a smooth transition of Carsen’s business of distributing and servicing Olympus and certain non-Olympus products in Canada. Cantel has also agreed (on behalf of itself and its affiliates) not to manufacture, distribute, sell or represent for sale in Canada through July 31, 2008 any products that are competitive with the Olympus products formerly sold by Carsen under its Olympus Distribution Agreements.

 

The $21,200,000 formula-based portion of the purchase price was based on the book value of Carsen’s inventories of Olympus and certain non-Olympus products and the net book amount of Carsen’s accounts receivable and certain other assets, all at July 31, 2006, subject to offsets, particularly for accounts payable of Carsen due to Olympus.

 

Net proceeds from Carsen’s sale of net assets and the termination of Carsen’s operations were approximately $21,100,000 (excluding the backlog payments) after satisfaction of remaining liabilities and taxes.

 

As a result of the foregoing transaction, which coincided with the expiration of Carsen’s exclusive distribution agreements with Olympus on July 31, 2006, Carsen no longer has any remaining product lines or active business operations.

 

The net sales and operating income attributable to Carsen’s business (inclusive of both Olympus and non-Olympus business, but exclusive of the sale of Medivators reprocessors) constituted the entire Endoscopy and Surgical reporting segment and Scientific operating segment, which historically was included within the All Other reporting segment; as such, we no longer have any operations in these two segments.

 

40



 

Operating segment information and net income attributable to Carsen’s business is summarized below:

 

 

 

Year Ended July 31,
2007

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,428,000

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

$

427,000

 

Interest expense

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

427,000

 

Income taxes

 

85,000

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

$

342,000

 

 

Cash flows attributable to discontinued operations consist solely of net cash used in operating activities of $93,000 and $4,867,000 in fiscals 2008 and 2007, respectively. In fiscal 2008, net cash used in operating activities was due to the payment of Carsen’s remaining liabilities that existed at July 31, 2007, which primarily related to various taxes. In fiscal 2007, net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to the payment of Carsen’s remaining operating costs relating to fiscal 2006, income tax payments and various wind-down costs, partially offset by the collection of the remaining receivables.

 

20.          Quarterly Results of Operations (unaudited)

 

The following is a summary of the quarterly results of operations for the years ended July 31, 2009 and 2008:

 

 

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

 

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

64,406,000

 

$

62,420,000

 

$

66,431,000

 

$

66,793,000

 

Cost of sales

 

40,783,000

 

38,809,000

 

40,908,000

 

40,071,000

 

Gross profit

 

23,623,000

 

23,611,000

 

25,523,000

 

26,722,000

 

Gross profit percentage

 

36.7

%

37.8

%

38.4

%

40.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

3,333,000

 

$

3,774,000

 

$

4,183,000

 

$

4,279,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.21

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.26

 

Diluted

 

$

0.20

 

$

0.23

 

$

0.25

 

$

0.26

 

 

 

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

 

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

60,005,000

 

$

60,910,000

 

$

64,178,000

 

$

64,281,000

 

Cost of sales

 

38,799,000

 

39,424,000

 

41,897,000

 

41,628,000

 

Gross profit

 

21,206,000

 

21,486,000

 

22,281,000

 

22,653,000

 

Gross profit percentage

 

35.3

%

35.3

%

34.7

%

35.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

1,939,000

 

$

2,157,000

 

$

2,001,000

 

$

2,596,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share: (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.13

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.16

 

Diluted

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.13

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.16

 

 


(1)  The summation of quarterly earnings per share does not necessarily equal the fiscal year earnings per share due to rounding.

 

41



 

21.          Legal Proceedings

 

In the normal course of business, we are subject to pending and threatened legal actions. It is our policy to accrue for amounts related to these legal matters if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount of anticipated exposure can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any of these pending claims or legal actions will have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

22.          Convertible Note Receivable

 

In February 2009, we invested an initial $200,000 in a senior subordinated convertible promissory note (the “Note”) issued by BIOSAFE, Inc. (“BIOSAFE”), in connection with BIOSAFE’s grant to us of certain exclusive and non-exclusive license rights to BIOSAFE’s antimicrobial additive. BIOSAFE is the owner of a patented and proprietary antimicrobial agent that is built into the manufacturing of end-products to achieve long-lasting microbial protection on such end-products’ surface. As a result of BIOSAFE’s successful raising of a minimum incremental amount of cash following our investment, we are obligated to invest an additional $300,000 in notes of BIOSAFE, which is expected to occur in the first half of fiscal 2010.

 

The Note accrues interest at a per annum rate of 8% until the maturity date of June 30, 2011 or earlier exercise. The Note is convertible into a newly-created series of preferred stock of BIOSAFE. Interest is payable in shares of BIOSAFE stock, or if a next round of financing does not occur by the maturity date, in cash. If not paid by the maturity date, interest will accrue thereafter at a rate of 12% per annum. In connection with our investment, we entered into a license agreement with BIOSAFE under which we will pay BIOSAFE a fixed royalty percentage of sales of our products containing BIOSAFE’s antimicrobial formulation. This investment, together with the accrued interest of $7,000, is included within other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at July 31, 2009.

 

42



 

CANTEL MEDICAL CORP.

 

SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

 

 

 

Balance at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance

 

 

 

Beginning

 

 

 

 

 

Translation

 

at End

 

 

 

of Period

 

Additions

 

(Deductions)

 

Adjustments

 

of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended July 31, 2009

 

$

1,021,000

 

$

309,000

 

$

(207,000

)

$

(43,000

)

$

1,080,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended July 31, 2008

 

$

927,000

 

$

404,000

 

$

(351,000

)

$

41,000

 

$

1,021,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended July 31, 2007

 

$

929,000

 

$

162,000

 

$

(198,000

)

$

34,000

 

$

927,000

 

 

43