Back to GetFilings.com
FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 001-12822
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
58-2086934 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
Identification No.) |
1000 Abernathy Road, Suite 1200, Atlanta, Georgia 30328
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(Registrant's telephone number including area code) (770) 829-3700
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Securities |
Exchanges on which Registered |
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share |
New York Stock Exchange |
Preferred Share Purchase Rights |
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No o
The aggregate market value of the registrants Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (13,359,995 shares) as of March 31, 2004, based on the closing sale price per share as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date, was $1,412,285,071.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants Common Stock as of November 16, 2004 was 13,831,234.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
Part of 10-K where incorporated |
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders |
III |
|
|
Website Access to Company Reports
Beazer Homes internet website address is www.beazer.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file with or furnish them to the Securities and Exchange Commission and are available in print to any stockholder who requests a printed copy.
FORM 10-K
INDEX
|
|
Page
Number |
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
2 |
Item 2. |
|
10 |
Item 3. |
|
10 |
Item 4. |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
13 |
Item 6. |
|
14 |
Item 7. |
|
16 |
Item 7A. |
|
32 |
Item 8. |
|
33 |
Item 9. |
|
63 |
Item 9A. |
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 10. |
|
63 |
Item 11. |
|
63 |
Item 12. |
|
63 |
Item 13. |
|
63 |
Item 14. |
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15. |
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our principal executive offices are located at 1000 Abernathy Road, Suite 1200, Atlanta, Georgia 30328, telephone (770) 829-3700. We also provide information about our active communities and mortgage financing through our Internet website located at http://www.beazer.com. Information on our website is not a part of and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in this report.
We design, build and sell primarily single-family homes in the following locations within the United States:
Region/State |
Market(s) / Year Entered |
|
|
Southeast Region: |
|
Florida |
Jacksonville (1993), Fort Myers/Naples (1996), Tampa/St. Petersburg (1996), Orlando (1997) |
Georgia |
Atlanta (1985) |
North Carolina |
Charlotte (1987), Raleigh/Durham (1992), Greensboro (1999) |
South Carolina |
Charleston (1987), Columbia (1993), Myrtle Beach (2002) |
Tennessee/Mississippi |
Nashville (1987), Memphis (2002), Northern Mississippi (2002) |
|
|
West Region: |
|
Arizona |
Phoenix (1993) |
California |
Los Angeles County (1993), Orange County (1993), Riverside & San Bernadino Counties (1993), San Diego County (1992), Ventura County (1993), Sacramento (1993) |
Colorado |
Denver (2001), Colorado Springs (2003) |
Nevada |
Las Vegas (1993) |
|
|
Central Region: |
|
Texas |
Dallas/Ft. Worth (1995), Houston (1995) |
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region: |
|
Maryland/Delaware |
Baltimore (1998), Metro-Washington DC (1998), Delaware (2003) |
New Jersey/ Pennsylvania |
Central and Southern New Jersey (1998), Bucks County, PA (1998) |
Virginia/West Virginia |
Fairfax County (1998), Loudoun County (1998), Prince William County (1998), West Virginia (2004) |
|
|
Midwest Region: |
|
Indiana |
Indianapolis (2002), Lafayette (2002), Ft. Wayne (2002) |
Kentucky |
Lexington (2002) |
Ohio |
Columbus (2002), Cincinnati/Dayton (2002) |
We design our homes at various price points to appeal to homebuyers across various demographic segments. Our objective is to provide our customers at each price point with homes that incorporate exceptional value and quality while seeking to maximize our return on invested capital. To achieve this objective, we have developed a business strategy which focuses on the following elements:
Geographic Diversity and Growth Markets. We compete in a large number of geographically diverse markets in an attempt to reduce our exposure to any particular regional economy. Most of the markets in which we operate have experienced significant population growth in recent years. Within these markets, we build homes in a variety of projects. Our business strategy entails further increasing our market penetration across the geographically diverse markets in which we compete.
Leverage of National Brand. In October 2003, we launched a branding strategy that is designed to build a unified consumer brand across all markets in which we operate. Our new national branding strategy presents us as one company with one name, one logo, one message and one purpose. We believe that a national branding strategy will differentiate us from our competitors by promoting qualities that lead to good recommendations, referrals to family and friends, and repeat purchases by loyal customers. We feel that a strengthened, national brand identity will better position us to consistently address the needs of our customers across all of our markets.
Leverage Size, Scale and Capabilities to Achieve Optimal Efficiencies. The Company has implemented specific profitability initiatives which focus on leveraging our size, scale and capabilities in order to achieve enhanced gross profit and operating profit margins. These initiatives include:
|
§ |
leveraging our size to create economies of scale in purchasing and construction; |
|
§ |
standardizing best practices and product designs; |
|
§ |
using branding and increased market penetration to maximize efficiency of land use; and |
|
§ |
leveraging our fixed cost infrastructure by increasing depth and breadth in markets where we have an established presence. |
Quality Homes at Various Price-Points to Meet the Needs of Increasingly Diverse Homebuyers. We seek to maximize customer satisfaction by offering homes which incorporate quality materials, distinctive design features, convenient locations and competitive prices. During fiscal year 2004, the average sales price of our homes closed was approximately $232,200. Our product strategy entails addressing the needs of an increasingly diverse profile of buyers as evidenced by demographic trends including, among others, increased immigration, changing profiles of households, the aging of the baby-boomers, and the rise of the echo-boomers (children of the baby-boomers) into the ranks of homeownership. Our
product offering is broken down into the following product categories:
Economy. These homes are targeted primarily at entry-level buyers, are generally 1,500 square feet or less in size, and are intended to meet the needs of those buyers for whom price is the most important factor in the buying decision.
Value. These homes are targeted at entry-level and move-up buyers, generally range from 1,500 to 2,500 square feet in size, and are intended to appeal to buyers who are more interested in style and features, but are still somewhat price-focused.
Style. These homes are targeted at more affluent move-up buyers, are generally greater than 2,500 square feet in size, and are intended to appeal to buyers in the more luxurious segment of the market, who place greater emphasis on style and features.
In addition, we also offer homes to the active-adult segment which is targeted to buyers over 55 years of age, in communities with special amenities. We offer these homes within the Economy, Value and Style categories described above. Within each product category, we seek to provide exceptional value and to ensure an enjoyable customer experience.
Additional Products and Services for Homebuyers. In order to maximize our profitability and provide our customers with the additional products and services that they desire, we have incorporated design centers and mortgage origination operations into our business. Recognizing that our customers want to choose certain components of their new home, we offer limited customization through the use of design studios in most of our markets. These design studios allow the customer to select certain non-structural customizations for their homes such as cabinetry, flooring, fixtures, applianc
es and wall coverings. Additionally, recognizing the homebuyer's desire to simplify the financing process, we originate mortgages on behalf of our customers through our subsidiary Beazer Mortgage Corporation, or Beazer Mortgage. Beazer Mortgage originates, processes and brokers mortgages to third party investors. Beazer Mortgage generally does not retain or service the mortgages that it brokers. We also provide title services to our customers in many of our markets.
Decentralized Operations with Experienced Management. We believe our in-depth knowledge of our local markets enables us to better serve our customers. Our local managers, who have significant experience in both the homebuilding industry and the markets they serve, are responsible for operating decisions regarding design, construction and marketing. We combine these decentralized operations with a centralized corporate-level management which controls decisions regarding overall strategy, land acquisitions and financial matters.
Conservative Land Policies. We seek to maximize our return on capital by judiciously managing our investment in land. To reduce the risks associated with investments in land, we use options to control land whenever possible. In addition, we do not speculate in land which is not generally subject to entitlements providing basic development rights to the owner.
Value Created. We evaluate our financial performance and the financial performance of our operations using Value Created, a variation of economic profit or economic value added. Value Created measures the extent to which we exceed our cost of capital. It is calculated as earnings before interest
and taxes (EBIT), less a charge for all of the capital employed multiplied by our estimate of our minimum weighted average cost of capital.
Company History
In March 1994, we completed a concurrent initial public offering of common stock and issuance of senior notes (the IPO). Prior to our IPO, we were an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Hanson PLC (Hanson), a company registered in the United Kingdom. Hanson currently does not hold any investment, or ongoing interest, in us.
In January 2002, we signed an agreement to merge with Crossmann Communities, Inc., or Crossmann. Operating in eleven markets in Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi, Ohio, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee, Crossmann primarily targeted entry-level and first time move-up homebuyers. Pursuant to the merger agreement, on April 17, 2002, Crossmann merged into our wholly owned subsidiary, Beazer Homes Investment Corp.
Markets and Product Description
We evaluate a number of factors in determining which geographic markets to enter or in which markets to concentrate our homebuilding activities. We attempt to anticipate swings in economic and real estate conditions by evaluating such statistical information as:
|
· |
the historical and projected growth of the population; |
|
· |
the number of new jobs created or projected to be created; |
|
· |
the number of housing starts in previous periods; |
|
· |
building lot availability and price; |
|
· |
level of competition; and |
|
· |
home sale absorption rates. |
We generally seek to differentiate ourselves from our competition in a particular market with respect to customer service and product type. We maintain the flexibility to alter our product mix within a given market depending on market conditions. In determining our product mix we consider demographic trends, demand for a particular type of product, margins, timing and the economic strength of the market. Although some of our Value and Style homes are priced at the upper end of the market and we offer a selection of amenities, we generally do not build "custom homes." The prices of our Value and Style homes generally are well below the prices of custom homes in most areas. We attempt to maximize efficiency by using standardized design plans whenever possible.
The following table summarizes certain operating information regarding our markets as of and for the year ended September 30, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
State |
|
Number of Active Subdivisions |
|
Number of Homes Closed |
|
Average Closing Price |
|
Units in Backlog at Year End |
|
Dollar Value of Backlog at Year End |
|
Arizona |
|
|
32 |
|
|
1,403 |
|
$ |
209.1 |
|
|
1,068 |
|
$ |
253,193 |
|
California |
|
|
31 |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
362.1 |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
432,293 |
|
Colorado |
|
|
15 |
|
|
420 |
|
|
370.3 |
|
|
133 |
|
|
46,951 |
|
Florida |
|
|
41 |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
241.6 |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
301,021 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
19 |
|
|
670 |
|
|
208.7 |
|
|
168 |
|
|
40,901 |
|
Indiana |
|
|
86 |
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
144.6 |
|
|
875 |
|
|
123,532 |
|
Kentucky |
|
|
8 |
|
|
209 |
|
|
135.5 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
6,237 |
|
Maryland/Delaware |
|
|
21 |
|
|
333 |
|
|
348.8 |
|
|
371 |
|
|
125,758 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
12 |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
222.8 |
|
|
919 |
|
|
271,620 |
|
New Jersey/Pennsylvania |
|
|
13 |
|
|
381 |
|
|
342.8 |
|
|
236 |
|
|
87,980 |
|
North & South Carolina |
|
|
89 |
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
149.0 |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
165,475 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
35 |
|
|
592 |
|
|
170.6 |
|
|
294 |
|
|
54,556 |
|
Tennessee/Mississippi |
|
|
28 |
|
|
726 |
|
|
179.4 |
|
|
245 |
|
|
44,606 |
|
Texas |
|
|
43 |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
160.4 |
|
|
429 |
|
|
68,105 |
|
Virginia/West Virginia |
|
|
23 |
|
|
869 |
|
|
360.0 |
|
|
440 |
|
|
213,689 |
|
Total Company |
|
|
496 |
|
|
16,451 |
|
$ |
232.2 |
|
|
8,456 |
|
$ |
2,235,917 |
|
Our homebuilding and marketing activities are conducted under the name of Beazer Homes in each of our markets, except for certain communities in Indianapolis, Indiana which operate under the trade name Trinity Homes.
Corporate Operations
We perform the following functions at a centralized level:
|
· |
evaluate and select geographic markets; |
|
· |
allocate capital resources to particular markets, including with respect to land acquisitions; |
|
· |
maintain and develop our relationships with lenders and capital markets constituencies to regulate the flow of financial resources; |
|
· |
maintain centralized information systems; and |
|
· |
monitor the decentralized operations of our subsidiaries and divisions. |
We allocate capital resources necessary for new projects in a manner consistent with our overall operating strategy. We utilize Value Created, return on capital employed and profit margin as criteria for our allocation of capital resources. We will vary the capital allocation based on market conditions, results of operations and other factors. Capital commitments are determined through consultation among selected executive and operational personnel, who play an important role in ensuring that new projects are consistent with our strategy. Centralized financial controls are also maintained through the standardiz
ation of accounting and financial policies and procedures.
Structurally, we operate through separate divisions, which are generally located within the areas in which they operate. Each division is managed by executives with substantial experience in the division's market. In addition, each division is equipped with the skills to complete the functions of land acquisition, map processing, land development, construction, marketing, sales and product service.
Land Acquisition and Development
Substantially all of the land we acquire is purchased only after necessary entitlements have been obtained so that we have the right to begin development or construction as market conditions dictate. In certain situations, we will purchase property without all necessary entitlements where we perceive an opportunity to build on such property in a manner consistent with our strategy. The term "entitlements" refers to development agreements, tentative maps or recorded plats, depending on the jurisdiction within which the land is located. Entitlements generally give a developer the right to obtain building permits upon compliance with conditions that are usually within the developer's control. Although entitlements are ordinarily obtained prior to the purchase of land, we are still required to obtain a variety of other governmental approvals and permits during the development process.
We select our land for development based upon a variety of factors, including:
|
· |
internal and external demographic and marketing studies; |
|
· |
suitability for development during the time period of one to five years from the beginning of the development process to the last closing; |
|
· |
financial review as to the feasibility of the proposed project, including projected Value Created, profit margins and returns on capital employed; |
|
· |
the ability to secure governmental approvals and entitlements; |
|
· |
environmental and legal due diligence; |
|
· |
competition in the area; |
|
· |
proximity to local traffic corridors and amenities; and |
|
· |
management's judgment as to the real estate market and economic trends and our experience in a particular market. |
We generally purchase land or obtain an option to purchase land, which, in either case, requires certain site improvements prior to construction. Where required, we then undertake or, in the case of land under option, the grantor of the option then undertakes, the development activities (through contractual arrangements with local developers) which include site planning and engineering, as well as constructing road, sewer, water, utilities, drainage and recreational facilities and other amenities. When available in certain markets, we also buy finished lots that are ready for construction.
We strive to develop a design and marketing concept for each of our projects, which includes determination of size, style and price range of the homes, layout of streets, layout of individual lots and overall community design. The product line offered in a particular project depends upon many factors, including the housing generally available in the area, the needs of a particular market and our cost of lots in the project. We are, however, often able to use standardized design plans.
The development and construction of each project are managed by our operating divisions, each of which is generally led by a president who, in turn, reports directly or indirectly to our Chief Operating Officer and our Chief Executive Officer. At the development stage, a manager (who may be assigned to several projects and reports to the president of the division) supervises development of buildable lots. In addition, a builder is responsible for each project site to supervise actual construction, and each division has one or more customer care and marketing representatives assigned to projects operated by that division.
The following table sets forth, by state, land controlled by us as of September 30, 2004:
|
Lots Owned |
|
Lots Under Contract(3) |
|
|
|
Undevel- |
Lots Under |
|
Homes |
Total |
|
Undevel- |
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
oped |
Develop- |
Finished |
Under Con- |
Lots |
|
oped |
Finished |
Lots Under |
|
Land |
|
Lots(1) |
ment |
Lots |
struction(2) |
Owned |
|
Lots |
Lots |
Contract |
|
Controlled |
Southeast Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia |
- |
12 |
166 |
200 |
378 |
|
376 |
2,806 |
3,182 |
|
3,560 |
Florida |
765 |
1,964 |
888 |
855 |
4,472 |
|
326 |
2,883 |
3,209 |
|
7,681 |
North & South Carolina |
660 |
1,381 |
1,604 |
883 |
4,528 |
|
2,512 |
3,422 |
5,934 |
|
10,462 |
Tennessee/Mississippi |
- |
838 |
233 |
393 |
1,464 |
|
1,278 |
474 |
1,752 |
|
3,216 |
West Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
- |
2,152 |
670 |
456 |
3,278 |
|
2,905 |
475 |
3,380 |
|
6,658 |
California |
- |
2,562 |
483 |
1,121 |
4,166 |
|
4,489 |
802 |
5,291 |
|
9,457 |
Colorado |
- |
247 |
128 |
305 |
680 |
|
- |
1,665 |
1,665 |
|
2,345 |
Nevada |
- |
1,885 |
92 |
877 |
2,854 |
|
2,182 |
609 |
2,791 |
|
5,645 |
Central Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
273 |
3,285 |
1,553 |
498 |
5,609 |
|
75 |
1,343 |
1,418 |
|
7,027 |
Mid-Atlantic Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland/Delaware |
- |
563 |
124 |
184 |
871 |
|
- |
5,449 |
5,449 |
|
6,320 |
New Jersey/ Pennsylvania |
- |
220 |
445 |
191 |
856 |
|
3,460 |
395 |
3,855 |
|
4,711 |
Virginia/West Virginia |
- |
568 |
225 |
225 |
1,018 |
|
993 |
1,830 |
2,823 |
|
3,841 |
Midwest Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
Indiana |
- |
5,529 |
2,125 |
789 |
8,443 |
|
766 |
2,794 |
3,560 |
|
12,003 |
Kentucky |
- |
607 |
70 |
64 |
741 |
|
- |
647 |
647 |
|
1,388 |
Ohio |
1,310 |
45 |
1,004 |
428 |
2,787 |
|
2,192 |
1,278 |
3,470 |
|
6,257 |
Total |
3,008 |
21,858 |
9,810 |
7,469 |
42,145 |
|
21,554 |
26,872 |
48,426 |
|
90,571 |
(1) Undeveloped Lots consists of raw land that is expected to be developed into the respective number of lots reflected in this table.
(2) The category Homes Under Construction represents lots on which construction of a home has commenced.
(3) The classification within Lots Under Contract for this schedule is based upon level of completion at delivery as stated in the option contract.
Option Contracts: We acquire certain lots by means of option contracts. Option contracts generally require the payment of a cash deposit or issuance of a letter of credit for the right to acquire lots during a specified period of time at a certain price. Our option contracts generally have expiration periods ranging from one to sixty months.
Under option contracts, both with and without specific performance, purchase of the properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us and the sellers. Our obligation with respect to options with specific performance is included on our consolidated balance sheet in other liabilities at September 30, 2004. At September 30, 2004, we are committed to future amounts under option contracts with specific performance obligations that aggregated $28.2 million, net of cash deposits. Under option contracts without specific performance obligations, our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the non-refundable deposits, letters of credit and other non-refundable amounts incurred, which aggregated approximately $180.7 million at September 30, 2004. This amount includes letters of credit of approxi
mately $57.8 million. At September 30, 2004, future amounts under option contracts without specific performance obligations aggregated approximately $1.8 billion, net of cash deposits.
Construction
We act as the general contractor for the construction of our projects. Our project development operations are controlled by our subsidiaries and divisions, whose employees supervise the construction of each project, coordinate the activities of subcontractors and suppliers, subject their work to quality and cost controls and assure compliance with zoning and building codes. We specify that quality, durable materials be used in the construction of our homes. Our subcontractors follow design plans prepared by architects and engineers who are retained by us and whose designs are geared to the local market. Subcontractors typically are retained on a project-by-project basis to complete construction at a fixed price. Agreements with our subcontractors and materials' suppliers are generally entered into after competitive
bidding. In connection with this competitive bid process, we obtain information from prospective subcontractors and vendors with respect to their financial condition and ability to perform their agreements with us. We do not maintain significant inventories of construction materials except for materials being utilized for homes under construction. We have numerous suppliers of raw materials and services used in our business, and such materials and services have been and continue to be available. Material prices may fluctuate, however, due to various factors, including demand or supply shortages, which may be beyond the control of our vendors. From time to time we enter into regional and national supply contracts with certain of our vendors. We believe that our relationships with our suppliers and subcontractors are good.
Construction time for our homes depends on the availability of labor, materials and supplies, product type and location. Homes are designed to promote efficient use of space and materials, and to minimize construction costs and time. In all of our markets, construction of a home is typically completed within three to six months following commencement of construction. At September 30, 2004, we had 1,108 finished homes (excluding models), of which 763 were sold and included in backlog at such date.
Warranty Program
For homes sold through March 31, 2004 (and in certain markets, through July 31, 2004), we self-insure our structural warranty obligations through our wholly owned risk retention group, United Home Insurance Company, A Risk Retention Group, or UHIC. Beginning with homes sold April 1, 2004 (August 1, 2004 in certain markets), our warranties are issued and administered by Professional Warranty Corporation and insured by Steadfast Insurance Company, a Zurich American Company, subject to a $5 million per occurrence deductible.
Under the UHIC program, we provide a variety of warranties for our homes, spanning from one to ten years in length. We provide a one- to two-year limited warranty of workmanship and materials with each of our homes, which generally includes home inspection visits with the customer during the first year following the purchase of a home. We subcontract our homebuilding work to subcontractors who provide us with an indemnity and a certificate of insurance prior to receiving payments for their work and, therefore, claims relating to workmanship and materials are generally the primary responsibility of our subcontractors. In addition, the first year of our warranty covers defects in plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling and ventilation systems, and major structural defects; the second year of such warranty covers major
structural defects and certain defects in plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling and ventilation systems of the home (exclusive of defects in appliances, fixtures and equipment); and the final eight years of protection cover only major structural defects.
Under the Professional Warranty Corporation program, we provide a variety of warranties for our homes, spanning in length from one year to the period covered by the applicable statute of repose. We provide a one- to two-year limited warranty of workmanship and materials with each of our homes, which generally includes home inspection visits with the customer during the first year following the purchase of a home. We subcontract our homebuilding work to subcontractors who provide us with an indemnity and a certificate of insurance prior to receiving payments for their work and, therefore, claims relating to workmanship and materials are generally the primary responsibility of our subcontractors. In addition, the first year of our warranty covers defects in plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling and ventilation syste
ms, and construction defects; the second year of such warranty covers construction defects and certain defects in plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling and ventilation systems of the home (exclusive of defects in appliances, fixtures and equipment); and the remaining years of protection cover only construction defects.
We record a reserve of approximately 0.5% to 1.0% of the sales price of a home to cover warranty expenses, although this allowance is subject to adjustment in special circumstances. Our historical experience is that such warranty expenses generally fall within the amount established for such allowance.
In addition, we maintain third party insurance for most construction defects which we encounter in the normal course of business. We believe that our accruals and third party insurance are adequate to cover the ultimate resolution of our potential liabilities associated with known and anticipated warranty and construction defect related claims and litigation.
There can be no assurance, however, that the terms and limitations of the limited warranty will be effective against claims made by the homebuyers, that we will be able to renew our insurance coverage or renew it at reasonable rates, that we will not be liable for damages, the cost of repairs, and/or the expense of litigation surrounding possible construction defects, soil subsidence or building related claims or that claims will not arise out of uninsurable events or circumstances not covered by insurance and not subject to effective indemnification agreements with our subcontractors.
Marketing and Sales
We make extensive use of advertising and other promotional activities, including our website (http://www.beazer.com), mass-media advertisements, brochures, direct mail and the placement of strategically located signboards in the immediate areas of our developments.
We normally build, decorate, furnish and landscape between one and five model homes for each project and maintain on-site sales offices. At September 30, 2004, we maintained 667 model homes, of which 550 were owned and 117 were leased from third parties pursuant to sale and leaseback agreements. We believe that model homes play a particularly important role in our marketing efforts. Consequently, we expend a significant effort in creating an attractive atmosphere at our model homes. Interior decorations are undertaken by both in-house and local third-party design specialists, and vary within our models based upon th
e lifestyles of targeted homebuyers. The purchase of furniture, fixtures and fittings is coordinated to ensure that manufacturers bulk discounts are utilized to the maximum extent. Structural changes in design from the model homes are not generally permitted, but homebuyers may select various optional amenities. We also use a cross-referral program that encourages our personnel to direct customers to other Beazer Homes subdivisions based on the customers needs.
We generally sell our homes through commissioned employees (who typically work from the sales offices located at the model homes used in the subdivision) as well as through independent brokers. Our personnel are available to assist prospective homebuyers by providing them with floor plans, price information and tours of model homes and in connection with the selection of options. The selection of interior features is a principal component of our marketing and sales efforts. Sales personnel are trained by us and attend periodic meetings to be updated on sales techniques, competitive products in the area, the availability of financing, construction schedules, marketing and advertising plans, which management bel
ieves result in a sales force with extensive knowledge of our operating policies and housing products. Our policy also provides that sales personnel be licensed real estate agents where required by law. We also build a number of homes for which no signed sales contract exists at the time of commencement of construction. The use of an inventory of such homes is necessary to satisfy the requirements of relocated personnel and of independent brokers, who often represent customers who require a completed home within 60 days. At September 30, 2004, excluding models, we had 1,648 homes at various stages of completion (of which 345 were completed) for which we had not received a sales contract.
We sometimes use various sales incentives in order to attract homebuyers. The use of incentives depends largely on local economic and competitive market conditions.
Customer Financing
We provide customer financing through Beazer Mortgage. Beazer Mortgage provides mortgage origination services only, and generally does not retain or service the mortgages that it originates. These mortgages are generally funded by one of a network of mortgage lenders. Beazer Mortgage can provide qualified homebuyers numerous financing options, including a wide variety of conventional, FHA and VA financing programs. In certain situations we will seek to assist our homebuyers in obtaining financing from outside mortgage lenders and, in certain limited circumstances, we may attempt to minimize potential risks relating to the availability of customer financing by purchasing mortgage financing commitments that lock in the availability of funds and interest rates at specified levels for a certain period of time. Because
substantially all homebuyers utilize long-term mortgage financing to purchase a home, adverse economic conditions, increases in unemployment and high mortgage interest rates may deter and eliminate a substantial number of potential homebuyers from our markets in the future.
Competition and Market Factors
The development and sale of residential properties is highly competitive and fragmented. We compete for residential sales on the basis of a number of interrelated factors, including location, reputation, amenities, design, quality and price, with numerous large and small homebuilders, including some homebuilders with nationwide operations and greater financial resources and/or lower costs than us. We also compete for residential sales with individual resales of existing homes, available rental housing and, to a lesser extent, resales of condominiums. We believe that we compare favorably to other builders in the markets in which we operate, due primarily to:
|
· |
our experience within our geographic markets and breadth of product line, which allows us to vary our regional product offerings to reflect changing market conditions; |
|
· |
our responsiveness to market conditions, enabling us to capitalize on the opportunities for advantageous land acquisitions in desirable locations; and |
|
· |
our reputation for quality design, construction and service. |
The housing industry is cyclical and is affected by consumer confidence levels and prevailing economic conditions generally, including interest rate levels. A variety of other factors affect the housing industry and demand for new homes, including the availability of labor and materials and increases in the costs thereof, changes in costs associated with home ownership such as increases in property taxes and energy costs, changes in consumer preferences, demographic trends and the availability of and changes in mortgage financing programs.
Government Regulation and Environmental Matters
Substantially all of our land is purchased with entitlements, giving us the right to obtain building permits upon compliance with specified conditions, which generally are within our control. Upon compliance with such conditions, we must obtain building permits. The length of time necessary to obtain such permits and approvals affects the carrying costs of unimproved property acquired for the purpose of development and construction. In addition, the continued effectiveness of permits already granted is subject to factors such as changes in policies, rules and regulations and their interpretation and application. Several governmental authorities have imposed impact fees as a means of defraying the cost of providing certain governmental services to developing areas. To date, the governmental approval processes discus
sed above have not had a material adverse effect on our development activities, and indeed all homebuilders in a given market face the same fees and restrictions. There can be no assurance, however, that these and other restrictions will not adversely affect us in the future.
We may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from developing communities due to building moratoriums or "slow-growth" or "no-growth" initiatives or building permit allocation ordinances which could be implemented in the future in the states and markets in which we operate. Substantially all of our land is entitled and, therefore, the moratoriums generally would only adversely affect us if they arose from health, safety and welfare issues such as insufficient water or sewage facilities. Local and state governments also have broad discretion regarding the imposition of development fees for projects in their jurisdiction. These fees are normally established, however, when we receive recorded final maps and building permits. We are also subject to a variety of local, state and federal statutes
, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the protection of health and the environment. These laws may result in delays, cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, and prohibit or severely restrict development in certain environmentally sensitive regions or areas.
Bonds and Other Obligations
We are frequently required, in connection with the development of our projects, to obtain letters of credit and performance, maintenance and other bonds in support of our related obligations with respect to such developments. The amount of such obligations outstanding at any time varies in accordance with our pending development activities. In the event any such bonds or letters of credit are drawn upon, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of such bonds or letters of credit. At September 30, 2004 we had outstanding approximately $45.9 million and $351.3 million of outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds, respectively, related to our obligations to local governments to construct roads and other improvements in various developments in addition to outstanding letters of credit of approximately $5
7.8 million related to our land option contracts. We do not believe that we will be required to draw upon any such bonds or letters of credit.
Employees and Subcontractors
At September 30, 2004, we employed 3,428 persons, of whom 747 were sales and marketing personnel, 1,223 were executive, management and administrative personnel, 1,238 were involved in construction and 220 were personnel of Beazer Mortgage. Although none of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, certain of the subcontractors engaged by us are represented by labor unions or are subject to collective bargaining arrangements. We believe that our relations with our employees and subcontractors are good.
We lease approximately 42,000square feet of office space in Atlanta, Georgia to house our corporate headquarters. We also lease an aggregate of approximately 481,000 square feet of office space for our subsidiaries operations at various locations. We own approximately 18,500 square feet of manufacturing space and an aggregate of 57,872 square feet of office space in Nashville, Tennessee and Indianapolis, Indiana.
As of September 30, 2004, our subsidiary, Trinity Homes LLC, had received 979 construction defect and warranty complaints related to moisture intrusion and mold. As of September 30, 2004, there were eleven pending lawsuits related to these complaints. One of these suits, Christopher J. Colon and Mary A. Colon v. Trinity Homes LLC and Beazer Homes Investment Corp. (formerly filed as Gary Harmon and Sheri Harmon v. Trinity Homes LLC and Beazer Homes Investment Corp.) is a class action suit that was filed in Hamilton County Superior Court in the State of Indiana on August 19, 2003 against Trinity and Beazer Homes Investment C
orp., another one of our subsidiaries and Trinitys parent. As part of that case, the plaintiffs are asserting that Trinity and Beazer Homes Investment Corp. violated applicable building codes. The complaint attempts to define the purported class to include all owners of a residential structure in Indiana constructed and marketed by Trinity and Beazer Homes Investment Corp. in which a one-inch gap with a vapor barrier does not exist between an exterior brick veneer wall and the surface of the underlying exterior wall. Excluded from the class are any residents who suffer personal injuries caused by mold infestation. No monetary amount was stated in the claim.
The parties in the putative class action engaged in a series of mediation conferences which resulted in an agreement for a proposed settlement of the case. The parties submitted settlement documents to the court, which the Court preliminarily approved on August 6, 2004. A Fairness Hearing was held on October 18, 2004 and the Court approved the settlement agreement on October 20, 2004.
The settlement class is defined as the current owners of all Trinity homes that have brick veneer, where the closing of Trinitys initial sale of the home took place between June 1, 1998 and October 31, 2002. However, the class definition specifically excludes (a) any houses built by Homes by John McKenzie; (b) any houses owned by Trinity as of August 6, 2004, or which as of August 6, 2004 were the subject of an executed agreement for Trinity to purchase the homes; and (c) any houses for which a homeowner has executed or agreed to a release in favor of Trinity as part of a separate agreement.
The settlement agreement establishes an agreed protocol and process for assessment and remediation of any external water intrusion issues at the homes which includes, among other things, that the homes will be repaired at Trinitys expense. A licensed engineering firm working on behalf of the homeowners will be allowed to review the plan for the remediation of each home as well as the performance of the repair work. The settlement establishes a time frame within which the work must be completed and provides a Dispute Resolution Panel to resolve disputes between a homeowner and Trinity concerning both the plan to remediate the home and the performance of the work.
Under the settlement, each homeowner releases Trinity, Beazer Homes Investment Corp. and other affiliated companies from the claims asserted in the class action lawsuit, claims arising out of external water intrusion, and claims of improper brick installation, including property damage claims, loss or diminution of property value claims, and most personal injury claims, among others.
There was a 30-day timeframe, which ended on November 19, 2004, to appeal the Courts Order approving the settlement. No appeals were received by the Court within the timeframe established. The Company expects to send out the claims notices on or about December 20, 2004 and the Class Members will have 60 days to file Claims.
In November 2003, Beazer Homes received a request for information from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean Water Act seeking information concerning the nature and extent of storm water discharge practices relating to certain projects undertaken since December 1998. Beazer Homes identified 381 projects within this category and the EPA sought specific information concerning 71 of them and is conducting site inspections on certain others. As of September 30, 2004, the EPA or an equivalent state agency has issued Administrative Orders identifying alleged instances of noncompliance for 20 of the sites. The Administrative Orders provide mandatory compliance schedules to address the alleged deficiencies in storm water management practices, but do not
impose any monetary penalties. The EPA has reserved the right to impose monetary penalties at a later date, the amount of which, if any, cannot currently be estimated. Beazer Homes is working to comply with the requirements of the Administrative Orders and to otherwise maintain compliance with the requirements of the Clean Water Act.
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions, including relating to moisture intrusion and related mold claims, construction defects and product liability. Certain of the liabilities resulting from these actions are covered by insurance. In our opinion, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
SEPARATE ITEM: EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Name |
Age |
Position |
Executive Officers |
|
|
Ian J. McCarthy |
51 |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Michael H. Furlow |
54 |
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer |
James OLeary |
41 |
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
John Skelton |
55 |
Senior Vice President, Forward Planning |
C. Lowell Ball |
47 |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel |
Michael T. Rand |
42 |
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer |
Jonathan P. Smoke |
35 |
Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer |
Cory J. Bodyston |
45 |
Senior Vice President, Treasurer |
Fred Fratto |
50 |
Senior Vice President, Human Resources |
Business Experience
IAN J. MCCARTHY. Mr. McCarthy is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Beazer Homes and has served as a director of Beazer Homes since the initial public offering of common stock in March 1994 (the IPO). Mr. McCarthy has served as President of predecessors of Beazer Homes since January 1991 and was responsible for all United States residential homebuilding operations in that capacity. During the period May 1981 to January 1991, Mr. McCarthy was employed in Hong Kong and Thailand becoming a director of Beazer Far East and from January 1980 to May 1981 was employed by Kier, Ltd., a comp
any engaged in the United Kingdom construction industry which became an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Beazer PLC. Mr. McCarthy is a Chartered Civil Engineer with a Bachelor of Science degree from The City University, London. Mr. McCarthy currently serves as Chairman of the National Advisory Board of HomeAid America, and as a member of HomeAid America's Board of Directors. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Builder Homesite, Inc., on the Board of Directors of the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, and as a Trustee for the Woodruff Arts Center, Atlanta, Georgia. He was inducted into the California Building Industry Hall of Fame in 2004, the first non-California resident to receive this honor.
MICHAEL H. FURLOW. Mr. Furlow joined us in October 1997 as the Executive Vice President for Operations. In this capacity the Division Presidents report to Mr. Furlow and he is responsible for the performance of those operating divisions. During the 12 years prior to joining Beazer Homes, Mr. Furlow was with Pulte Home Corporation in various field and corporate roles, most recently as a Regional President. Mr. Furlow received a Bachelor of Arts degree with honors in accounting from the University of West Florida and initially worked as a Certified Public Accountant for Arthur Young & Company.
JAMES OLEARY. Mr. OLeary joined us in June 2002 as Executive Vice President, Corporate Development. In August 2003 he was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. OLeary was previously with U.S. Industries, Inc. from 1995 to 2002. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. OLeary was Chairman and CEO of LCA Group, Inc., U.S. Industries global lighting subsidiary. He also served as Executive Vice President of U.S. Industries from 1999 to 2002, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1998 to 1999 and Vice President and Corporate Controller from 1995 to 1998. Mr. OLeary held various financial and operational positions at Hanson PLC., U.S. Industries former parent company, from 1993 to 1995 at which time U.S. Industries was spun off to Hansons shareh
olders. Mr. OLeary was with Deloitte & Touche from 1985 to 1993. Mr. OLeary holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Pace University. Mr. OLeary is a licensed Certified Public Accountant.
JOHN SKELTON. Mr. Skelton served as Senior Vice President, Operations from the IPO through fiscal 1998, was appointed Senior Vice President, Financial Planning in fiscal 1999 and appointed Senior Vice President, Forward Planning in fiscal 2003. Mr. Skelton served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Beazer Homes, Inc., a subsidiary of Beazer Homes, since 1985 and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Beazer Homes Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Beazer Homes, since April 1993. During the period 1977 to 1985, Mr. Skelton served as Finance Director of Leech Homes, a subsidiary of Leech PLC which was acquired by Beazer PLC in 1985. After graduating with a Bachelor's degree from Durham University in the United Kingdom, he was employed by Deloitte & Touche and is a Fellow of the Institute of Chart
ered Accountants in England and Wales.
C. LOWELL BALL. Mr. Ball joined us in August 2000 as Senior Vice President and General Counsel. From 1992 to August 2000, Mr. Ball held equivalent positions with commercial real estate investment, development-operating companies, including Regent Partners, Inc., Compass Management and Leasing, Inc. and Dutch Institutional Holding Company. Prior to 1992, Mr. Ball practiced law for ten years with two major Atlanta law firms: Long, Aldridge & Norman and Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan. Mr. Ball graduated with honors from the University of North Carolina School of Law where he served on the Board of Editors of the North Carolina Law Review. He also received his undergraduate degree from the University of North Carolina where he was a Morehead Scholar.
MICHAEL T. RAND. Mr. Rand joined us in November 1996 as Vice President, Operational and Accounting Controls and was promoted to Vice President, Corporate Controller in June of 1998. Mr. Rand was promoted to Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller in October 2002, and to Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer in August 2004. Prior to joining Beazer Homes, Mr. Rand was with the firm KPMG Peat Marwick from 1984 to 1996, at which time he served as a Senior Audit Manager. Mr. Rand holds a Bachelors degree in Commerce from the University of Virginia and is a licensed Certified Public Accountant.
JONATHAN P. SMOKE. Mr. Smoke joined us in March 2001 as Vice President, eBusiness, was appointed Chief Information Officer in April 2002, and was promoted to Senior Vice President in September 2003. Mr. Smoke was previously with Lend Lease Corporation from 1999 to 2001 where he was responsible for ebusiness strategy and initiatives. Mr. Smoke was a management consultant with Deloitte & Touche from 1993 to 1999. Mr. Smoke holds a Master of Business Administration degree from the McCombs School of Business at the University of Texas at Austin and a Bachelor of Arts degree from Rhodes College.
CORY J. BOYDSTON. Mrs. Boydston joined us in January 1998 as Vice President and Treasurer, and was promoted to Senior Vice President in October 2004. Mrs. Boydston is currently responsible for the Treasury functions of the Company. She also oversees the Companys Title and Homeowner Insurance operations. Prior to joining Beazer, Mrs. Boydston was with Lennar Corporation from 1987 to 1997, serving in various capacities including Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, and Chief Financial Officer - Investment Division. Before joining Lennar, Mrs. Boydston was with Hayes Microcomputer Products and Arthur Andersen & Co. Mrs. Boydston received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting from Florida State University in 1981 and holds an active CPA license in the State of Georg
ia.
FRED FRATTO. Mr. Fratto joined us in October, 2002 as Vice President, Human Resources and was promoted to Senior Vice President in October 2004. Prior to joining Beazer Homes, Mr. Fratto served as Vice President, Human Resources and Administration for the Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation from 1999 to 2002. Previously, Mr. Fratto was with the Newell Rubbermaid Company from 1995 to 1999 and Westinghouse Electric Corporation from 1980 to 1995. He holds a Master of Science degree in Industrial and Labor Relations from West Virginia University and a Bachelor of Arts degree from Fairmont State College.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Market Information
The Company lists its common shares on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol BZH. On November 16, 2004, the last reported sales price of the Companys common stock on the NYSE was $125.00. On November 16, 2004, Beazer Homes USA, Inc. had approximately 115 shareholders of record and 13,831,234 shares of common stock outstanding. The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the range of high and low trading for the Companys common stock during fiscal 2004 and 2003.
Quarter ended: |
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
109.85 |
|
$ |
107.10 |
|
$ |
112.99 |
|
$ |
109.60 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
86.43 |
|
$ |
89.15 |
|
$ |
88.26 |
|
$ |
83.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
87.94 |
|
$ |
94.90 |
|
$ |
63.93 |
|
$ |
70.40 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
75.57 |
|
$ |
58.18 |
|
$ |
52.49 |
|
$ |
51.40 |
|
Dividends
During fiscal 2004, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per common share, or a total of approximately $5.5 million. The Company expects to continue paying regular cash dividends on a quarterly basis. However, the Board of Directors will periodically reconsider the declaration of dividends and the Company will pay dividends at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The continuation of payments, the amount of such dividends, and the form in which the dividends are paid (cash or stock) depends upon the results of operations, the financial condition of the Company and other factors which the Board of Directors deems relevant. The indentures under which our Senior Notes were issued contain certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on payment of dividends. At September 30, 2004, under the mos
t restrictive covenants of each indenture, approximately $289.7 million of our retained earnings was available for cash dividends and for share repurchases.
The following table provides information as of September 30, 2004 with respect to our shares of common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans, all of which have been approved by our stockholders:
Plan Category
|
|
Number of Common
Shares to be Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options
|
|
Number of Common
Shares Remaining
Available for Future
Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(excluding Common
Shares Reflected in
Column (a)) |
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders |
|
607,268 |
|
$58.78 |
|
1,007,348 |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Selected Financial Data |
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
3,907,109 |
|
$ |
3,177,408 |
|
$ |
2,641,173 |
|
$ |
1,805,177 |
|
$ |
1,527,865 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
377,935 |
|
|
279,155 |
|
|
193,174 |
|
|
121,027 |
|
|
75,623 |
|
Net income |
|
|
235,811 |
|
|
172,745 |
|
|
122,634 |
|
|
74,876 |
|
|
43,606 |
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
17.74 |
|
|
13.41 |
|
|
11.64 |
|
|
9.19 |
|
|
5.28 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
17.09 |
|
|
12.78 |
|
|
10.74 |
|
|
8.18 |
|
|
5.05 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (end of year): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
320,880 |
|
$ |
73,372 |
|
$ |
124,989 |
|
$ |
41,678 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Inventory |
|
|
2,344,095 |
|
|
1,723,483 |
|
|
1,364,133 |
|
|
844,737 |
|
|
629,663 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
3,149,462 |
|
|
2,212,034 |
|
|
1,892,847 |
|
|
995,289 |
|
|
696,228 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
1,137,404 |
|
|
741,365 |
|
|
739,100 |
|
|
395,238 |
|
|
252,349 |
|
Stockholders' equity |
|
|
1,232,121 |
|
|
993,695 |
|
|
799,515 |
|
|
351,195 |
|
|
270,538 |
|
Supplemental Financial Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by/(used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(73,719 |
) |
$ |
(41,049 |
) |
$ |
59,464 |
|
$ |
(25,578 |
) |
$ |
(18,726 |
) |
Investing activities |
|
|
(30,476 |
) |
|
(6,552 |
) |
|
(314,633 |
) |
|
(72,835 |
) |
|
(11,805 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
351,703 |
|
|
(4,016 |
) |
|
338,480 |
|
|
140,091 |
|
|
30,531 |
|
EBIT (i) |
|
|
452,774 |
|
|
340,980 |
|
|
245,060 |
|
|
155,983 |
|
|
99,189 |
|
EBITDA (i) |
|
|
468,529 |
|
|
354,200 |
|
|
254,513 |
|
|
165,236 |
|
|
106,041 |
|
Interest incurred (ii) |
|
|
76,035 |
|
|
65,295 |
|
|
51,171 |
|
|
35,825 |
|
|
30,897 |
|
EBIT/interest incurred |
|
|
5.95 |
x |
|
5.22 |
x |
|
4.79 |
x |
|
4.35 |
x |
|
3.21 |
x |
EBITDA/interest incurred |
|
|
6.16 |
x |
|
5.42 |
x |
|
4.97 |
x |
|
4.61 |
x |
|
3.43 |
x |
Financial Statistics (iii): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt as a percentage of total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debt and stockholders'equity |
|
|
48.0 |
% |
|
42.7 |
% |
|
48.0 |
% |
|
53.0 |
% |
|
48.3 |
% |
Asset Turnover |
|
|
1.46 |
x |
|
1.55 |
x |
|
1.83 |
x |
|
2.13 |
x |
|
2.37 |
x |
EBIT Margin |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
|
10.7 |
% |
|
9.3 |
% |
|
8.6 |
% |
|
6.5 |
% |
Return on average assets (pre-tax) |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
16.6 |
% |
|
17.0 |
% |
|
18.4 |
% |
|
15.4 |
% |
Return on average capital (pre-tax) |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
20.8 |
% |
|
21.4 |
% |
|
24.6 |
% |
|
20.4 |
% |
Return on average equity |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
19.3 |
% |
|
21.3 |
% |
|
24.1 |
% |
|
17.3 |
% |
(i) EBIT and EBITDA: EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) equals net income before (a) previously capitalized interest amortized to costs and expenses; and (b) income taxes. EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is calculated by adding depreciation and amortization for the period to EBIT. EBIT and EBITDA are not generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) financial measures. EBIT and EBITDA should not be considered alternatives to net income determined in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of operating performance, nor an alternative to cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of liquidity. Because some analysts and companies may not calculate EBIT and EBITDA in the same manner as Beazer Homes, the EBIT and EBITDA information presented
above may not be comparable to similar presentations by others.
EBITDA is a measure commonly used in the homebuilding industry and is presented to assist in understanding the ability of our operations to generate cash in addition to the cash needed to service existing interest requirements and ongoing tax obligations. By providing a measure of available cash, management believes that this non-GAAP measure enables holders of our outstanding senior indebtedness to better understand our cash performance and our ability to service our debt obligations as they currently exist and as additional indebtedness is incurred in the future. The measure is useful in budgeting and determining capital expenditure levels because it enables management to evaluate the amount of cash that will be available for discretionary spending.
A reconciliation of EBITDA and EBIT to cash provided/(used) by operations, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, is provided below for each period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided/(used) by operating activities |
|
$ |
(73,719 |
) |
$ |
(41,049 |
) |
$ |
59,464 |
|
$ |
(25,578 |
) |
$ |
(18,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in inventory |
|
|
410,525 |
|
|
328,893 |
|
|
152,990 |
|
|
153,668 |
|
|
97,104 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
150,764 |
|
|
112,784 |
|
|
79,425 |
|
|
47,872 |
|
|
27,879 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit (provision) |
|
|
22,740 |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
6,613 |
|
|
7,906 |
|
|
3,792 |
|
Interest amortized to cost of sales |
|
|
66,199 |
|
|
55,451 |
|
|
43,001 |
|
|
33,235 |
|
|
27,704 |
|
Increase in accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
(120,976 |
) |
|
(96,224 |
) |
|
(71,781 |
) |
|
(38,721 |
) |
|
(39,654 |
) |
Change in book overdraft |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(20,095 |
) |
|
11,219 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts receivable and other assets |
|
|
21,399 |
|
|
14,702 |
|
|
(2,010 |
) |
|
16,837 |
|
|
1,671 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
(7,570 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(1,202 |
) |
|
- |
|
Tax benefit from stock transactions |
|
|
(8,127 |
) |
|
(11,502 |
) |
|
(12,235 |
) |
|
(3,837 |
) |
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
(1,198 |
) |
|
(954 |
) |
|
(4,849 |
) |
|
(4,948 |
) |
EBITDA |
|
|
468,529 |
|
|
354,200 |
|
|
254,513 |
|
|
165,236 |
|
|
106,041 |
|
Less depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
13,220 |
|
|
9,453 |
|
|
9,253 |
|
|
6,852 |
|
EBIT |
|
$ |
452,774 |
|
$ |
340,980 |
|
$ |
245,060 |
|
$ |
155,983 |
|
$ |
99,189 |
|
(ii) All interest incurred is capitalized to inventory and subsequently amortized to cost of sales as homes are closed.
(iii) Asset turnover = (total revenue divided by average total assets); EBIT margin = (EBIT divided by total revenues); Return on average assets = (EBIT divided by average total assets); Return on average capital = (EBIT divided by average total debt plus stockholders' equity); Return on average equity = (net income divided by average stockholders' equity).
(iv) As discussed in Item 7 below and in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Beazer Homes acquired Crossmann Communities effective April 17, 2002.
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
Homebuilding: We design, build and sell single-family homes in the following regions and states:
Southeast |
West |
Central |
Mid-Atlantic |
Midwest |
Florida |
Arizona |
Texas |
Delaware |
Indiana |
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia |
California |
|
Maryland |
Kentucky |
|
|
|
|
|
Mississippi |
Colorado |
|
New Jersey |
Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina |
Nevada |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina |
|
|
Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
|
|
West Virginia |
|
We intend, subject to market conditions, to expand in our current markets through focused product expansion and price point diversification and to consider entering new markets either through expansion from existing markets or through acquisitions of established regional homebuilders. We seek to be one of the five largest builders in each of the markets that we serve.
Our homes are designed to appeal to homebuyers at various price-points across various demographic segments, and are generally offered for sale in advance of their construction. Once a sales contract has been signed by both the homebuyer and Beazer Homes, we classify the transaction as a "new order" and include the home in backlog. Such sales contracts are usually subject to certain contingencies such as the buyer's ability to qualify for financing. We do not recognize revenue on homes in backlog until the sales are closed and the risk of ownership has been transferred to the buyer.
Crossmann Acquisition: On April 16, 2002, our stockholders and the stockholders of Crossmann Communities, Inc. (Crossmann) approved the merger of Crossmann into one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, and the merger became effective on April 17, 2002. Crossmann built single-family homes in Indiana-its home base- with operations in Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and Tennessee and was a leading regional builder in these markets prior to the merger. We have included Crossmanns operating results in our consolidated financial statements since April 1, 2002, less an imputed interest charge on the cash portion of
the merger consideration for the period April 1, 2002 through April 16, 2002.
The aggregate merger consideration we paid consisted of approximately 3.9 million shares of our common stock (approximately $308.6 million) and $191.6 million in cash. In connection with the merger, we also repaid approximately $125.4 million of Crossmann debt. The cash portion of the merger consideration and the repayment of Crossmann debt upon the merger were funded from proceeds from our issuance of $350 million 8 3/8% Senior Notes due 2012 in a private placement on April 17, 2002.
Ancillary Businesses: We have established several businesses to support our core homebuilding operations. We operate design studios in the majority of our markets. Through design studios, homebuyers can choose non-structural upgrades and options for their new home. We also provide mortgage origination services for our homebuyers through Beazer Mortgage Corporation, or Beazer Mortgage. Beazer Mortgage originates, processes and brokers mortgages to third party investors. Beazer Mortgage generally does not retain or service the mortgages that it brokers. We also provide title services to our homebuyers in many of our markets. We will continue to evaluate opportunities to provide other ancillary services
to our homebuyers.
Critical Accounting Policies: Some of our critical accounting policies require the use of judgment in their application or require estimates of inherently uncertain matters. Although our accounting policies are in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, a change in the facts and circumstances of the underlying transactions could significantly change the application of the accounting policies and the resulting financial statement impact. Listed below are those policies that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their application.
Inventory Valuation
Housing projects and land held for development and sale are stated at cost (including direct construction costs, capitalized indirect costs, capitalized interest and real estate taxes) unless facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may be impaired. We assess these assets for recoverability in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets". SFAS No. 144 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generate
d by the asset. If these assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
These evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of revenues, costs and expenses and other factors. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, it is reasonably possible that actual results could differ from those estimates. Our assumptions about future home sales prices and volumes require significant judgment because the residential homebuilding industry is cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. We continue to evaluate the carrying value of our inventory and, based on historical results, believe that our existing estimation process is accurate and do not anticipate the process to materially change in the future.
Goodwill
We test goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that more likely than not reduce the value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. Each of our operating divisions is considered a reporting unit. The fair value of each reporting unit is determined based on expected discounted future cash flows. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired. If goodwill is considered impaired, the impairment loss to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds implied fair value of that goodwill. We performed our annual impairment test o
f goodwill as of April 30, 2004. For purposes of our annual goodwill impairment test, we obtained independent valuations of our reporting units. Based on comparison of those independent valuations to the carrying values of our reporting units at April 30, 2004, we determined that goodwill was not impaired.
Inherent in our fair value determinations are certain judgments and estimates, including projections of future cash flows, the discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, the interpretation of current economic indicators and market valuations and our strategic plans with regard to our operations. A change in these underlying assumptions would cause a change in the results of the tests, which could cause the fair value of one or more reporting units to be less than their respective carrying amounts. In addition, to the extent that there are significant changes in market conditions or overall economic conditions or our strategic plans change, it is possible that our conclusion regarding goodwill impairment could change, which could have a material effect on our financial position and results of o
perations.
Our goodwill has been assigned to reporting units in different geographic locations. Therefore, potential goodwill impairment charges resulting from changes in local market and /or local economic conditions or changes in our strategic plans may be isolated to one or a few of our reporting units. However, our business is concentrated in the homebuilding industry and, as such, a widespread decline in the homebuilding industry or a significant deterioration of economic conditions could have a negative impact on the estimated fair value of a larger number of our reporting units.
While we believe that no impairment existed as of September 30, 2004, there can be no assurances that future economic or financial developments, including general interest rate increases or poor performance in either the national economy or individual local economies, might not lead to impairment of goodwill prospectively.
Homebuilding Revenues and Costs
Revenue from the sale of a home is recognized when the closing has occurred and the risk of ownership is transferred to the buyer. All associated homebuilding costs are charged to cost of sales in the period when the revenues from home closings are recognized. Homebuilding costs include land and land development costs (based upon an allocation of such costs, including costs to complete the development, or specific lot costs), home construction costs (including an estimate of costs, if any, to complete home construction), previously capitalized indirect costs (principally for construction supervision), capitalized interest and estimated warranty costs. Sales commissions are included in selling, general and administrative expense when the closing has occurred. All other costs are expensed as incurred.
Warranty Reserves
We provide a limited warranty (ranging from one to two years) of workmanship and materials with each of our homes. Such warranty covers defects in plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling and ventilating systems and construction defects. In addition, we provide a warranty (ranging from a minimum of ten years up to the period covered by the applicable statute of repose) with each of our homes, covering construction defects only. Since we subcontract our homebuilding work to subcontractors who generally provide us with an indemnity and a certificate of insurance prior to receiving payments for their work, claims relating to workmanship and materials are generally the primary responsibility of our subcontractors.
Warranty reserves are included in accrued expenses in the consolidated financial statements. We record reserves covering our anticipated warranty expense for each home closed. Management reviews the adequacy of warranty reserves each reporting period based on historical experience and managements estimate of the costs to remediate the claims and adjusts these provisions accordingly. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. Based on historical results, we believe that our existing estimation process is accurate and do not anticipate the process to materially change in the future. Our warranty reserves at September 30, 2004 and 2003 include accruals for certain moisture instrusion issues. Our estimation
process for such accruals is discussed in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. While we believe that our warranty reserves at September 30, 2004 are adequate, there can be no assurances that historical data and trends will accurately predict our actual warranty costs or that future developments might not lead to a significant change in the reserve.
Value Created: We evaluate our financial performance and the financial performance of our operations using Value Created, a variation of economic profit or economic value added. Value Created measures the extent to which we exceed our cost of capital. It is ca
lculated as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), less a charge for all of the capital employed multiplied by our estimate of our minimum weighted average cost of capital. Most of our employees receive incentive compensation based upon a combination of Value Created and the change in Value Created during the year. For key managers a portion of the incentive is put in a bank. This portion is always at risk and may be paid out over three years. We believe that our Value Created system encourages managers to act like owners, rewards profitable growth and focuses attention on long-term loyalty and performance.
The following tables present certain operating and financial data for the years discussed:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
% Change |
|
Amount |
|
% Change |
|
Amount |
|
Number of new orders, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of cancellations(1) : |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
1,549 |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
1,265 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
650 |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
519 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
502 |
|
North and South Carolina |
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
2,850 |
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
2,177 |
|
Tennessee/Mississippi |
|
|
712 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
696 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
679 |
|
Total Southeast |
|
|
5,884 |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
5,614 |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
4,623 |
|
West Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
1,294 |
|
California |
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
2,239 |
|
Colorado |
|
|
410 |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
360 |
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
235 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
47.6 |
|
|
901 |
|
Total West |
|
|
6,733 |
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
5,142 |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
4,669 |
|
Central Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
|
1,128 |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
1,244 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland/Delaware |
|
|
430 |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
371 |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
322 |
|
New Jersey/Pennsylvania |
|
|
404 |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
350 |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
280 |
|
Virginia/West Virginia |
|
|
679 |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
934 |
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
763 |
|
Total Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
1,655 |
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
1,365 |
|
Midwest Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
|
2,026 |
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
1,211 |
|
Kentucky |
|
|
132 |
|
|
(42.4 |
) |
|
229 |
|
|
100.9 |
|
|
114 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
608 |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
522 |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
384 |
|
Total Midwest |
|
|
2,298 |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
2,777 |
|
|
62.5 |
|
|
1,709 |
|
Total |
|
|
17,481 |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
16,316 |
|
|
19.9 |
% |
|
13,610 |
|
Backlog at end of year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
58.9 |
% |
|
755 |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
670 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
168 |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
188 |
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
149 |
|
North and South Carolina |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
1,119 |
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
823 |
|
Tennessee/Mississippi |
|
|
245 |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
259 |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
225 |
|
Total Southeast |
|
|
2,629 |
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
2,321 |
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
1,867 |
|
West Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
707 |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
615 |
|
California |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
701 |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
733 |
|
Colorado |
|
|
133 |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
143 |
|
|
164.8 |
|
|
54 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
919 |
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
736 |
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
431 |
|
Total West |
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
1,833 |
|
Central Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
429 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
396 |
|
|
(21.9 |
) |
|
507 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland/Delaware |
|
|
371 |
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
274 |
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
149 |
|
New Jersey/Pennsylvania |
|
|
236 |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
213 |
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
139 |
|
Virginia/West Virginia |
|
|
440 |
|
|
(30.2 |
) |
|
630 |
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
412 |
|
Total Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
1,117 |
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
700 |
|
Midwest Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
875 |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
908 |
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
|
1,079 |
|
Kentucky |
|
|
42 |
|
|
(64.7 |
) |
|
119 |
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
77 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
294 |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
278 |
|
|
(39.0 |
) |
|
456 |
|
Total Midwest |
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
1,305 |
|
|
(19.0 |
) |
|
1,612 |
|
Total |
|
|
8,456 |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
7,426 |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
6,519 |
|
|
|
|
(1) New orders for 2002 do not include 2,535 homes in backlog from acquired operations. |
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
Number of closings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
1,464 |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
1,132 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
670 |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
480 |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
473 |
|
North and South Carolina |
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
2,554 |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
2,103 |
|
Tennessee/Mississippi |
|
|
726 |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
662 |
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
867 |
|
Total Southeast |
|
|
5,576 |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
5,160 |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
4,575 |
|
West Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
1,211 |
|
California |
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
2,059 |
|
Colorado |
|
|
420 |
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
271 |
|
|
(27.9 |
) |
|
376 |
|
Nevada |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
796 |
|
Total West |
|
|
5,880 |
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
4,688 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
4,442 |
|
Central Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
1,239 |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
1,121 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland/Delaware |
|
|
333 |
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
246 |
|
|
(29.3 |
) |
|
348 |
|
New Jersey/Pennsylvania |
|
|
381 |
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
276 |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
277 |
|
Virginia |
|
|
869 |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
716 |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
787 |
|
Total Mid-Atlantic |
|
|
1,583 |
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
1,412 |
|
Midwest Region: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
(27.6 |
) |
|
2,197 |
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
1,448 |
|
Kentucky |
|
|
209 |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
187 |
|
|
81.6 |
|
|
103 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
592 |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
700 |
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
502 |
|
Total Midwest |
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
3,084 |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
2,053 |
|
Total |
|
|
16,451 |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
15,409 |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
13,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding Revenues(in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast Region |
|
$ |
1,042,589 |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
$ |
900,901 |
|
|
18.6 |
% |
$ |
759,646 |
|
West Region |
|
|
1,694,954 |
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
1,161,983 |
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
994,120 |
|
Central Region |
|
|
163,569 |
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
192,841 |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
174,816 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
559,596 |
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
406,708 |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
380,296 |
|
Midwest Region |
|
|
359,320 |
|
|
(18.1 |
) |
|
438,831 |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
286,032 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,820,028 |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
$ |
3,101,264 |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
$ |
2,594,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average sales price per home closed(in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast Region |
|
$ |
187.0 |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
$ |
174.6 |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
$ |
166.0 |
|
West Region |
|
|
288.3 |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
247.9 |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
223.8 |
|
Central Region |
|
|
160.4 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
155.6 |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
155.9 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
353.5 |
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
328.5 |
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
269.3 |
|
Midwest Region |
|
|
150.2 |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
142.3 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
139.3 |
|
Company Average |
|
|
232.2 |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
201.3 |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
190.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of active subdivisions at year end: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast Region |
|
|
177 |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
178 |
|
|
(5.3 |
)% |
|
188 |
|
West Region |
|
|
90 |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
97 |
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
73 |
|
Central Region |
|
|
43 |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
34 |
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
|
|
57 |
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
35 |
|
Midwest Region |
|
|
129 |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
140 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
138 |
|
Total |
|
|
496 |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
494 |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
468 |
|
New Orders:
New orders increased in each of the last two fiscal years compared to the prior year.
The increases in new orders during fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003 were driven by our Southeast and West regions. Order increases in our Southeast region reflect strength in Georgia and Florida, which was somewhat offset by weakness in parts of the Carolinas. Orders increased in all markets in our West region, where demand continues to be strong. Orders were down in our Mid-Atlantic region compared to a strong 2003, including orders during 2003 for affordable housing units built through governmental programs. The decreases in orders in our Midwest region reflect continued weakness in our Indiana and Kentucky markets driven primarily by the soft economy in those markets. Management continues to focus efforts on improving performance in the Mid
west. We have initiated specific actions including completing a three-year financial plan, organizational alignment including management changes where appropriate, consolidating some office facilities, eliminating redundant costs, introducing new product into the region, and enhancing realtor programs and other marketing initiatives, including a coordinated media campaign centered on the Beazer Homes brand. Management continues to believe that these markets hold long-term strategic advantages for the Company. Orders were also down in our Central Region, reflecting continued weakness in our Dallas market.
The increases in new orders in fiscal 2003 reflected strong overall demand in most of our markets, with the strongest growth in the Southeast, Mid-Atlantic and West regions. Low interest rates and favorable demographic trends, including population growth, fueled demand, particularly in the first-time buyer segment. The increase in new orders in the Midwest during fiscal 2003 reflects the inclusion of results from that region for a full year compared to six months of fiscal 2002.
The fundamentals that drive sales activity are numerous and varied. On a macro level, low unemployment and low mortgage interest rates each contribute to a positive general homebuilding market environment. Our ability to stay ahead of changing customer preferences and local demographic trends with our product mix and to maintain adequate product supply (as measured by the number of active subdivisions) contributes locally to new order trends.
Backlog: The increases in unit backlog in each of the past two fiscal years reflect the favorable homebuilding environment driving new order activity, and our ability to gain market share. The average sales price of homes in backlog increased at September 30, 2004 to $264,400 from $221,500 at September 30, 2003 and $198,400 at September 30, 2002. The increase in the overall average price in backlog is due to our ability to raise prices in most markets, especially in our West and Mid-Atlantic regions, an increased percentage of homes in backlog from the higher priced West region, and our efforts in price point diversification where in some markets we are expanding our product offering to include higher priced
homes.
Aggregate Sales Value of Homes in Backlog |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
2,235,917 |
|
2003 |
|
|
1,644,814 |
|
2002 |
|
|
1,293,290 |
|
Average Sales Price of Homes in Backlog |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
$ |
264.4 |
|
2003 |
|
|
221.5 |
|
2002 |
|
|
198.4 |
|
Seasonality and Quarterly Variability:
Our homebuilding operating cycle generally reflects escalating new order activity in our second and third fiscal quarters and increased closings in our third and fourth fiscal quarters. Fiscal 2002 results include new orders and closings for Crossmann from April 1, 2002, resulting in an increase in new orders and in closings for the third and fourth fiscal quarters. We believe that the typical seasonality reflects the preference of homebuyers to shop for a new home in the spring, as well as the scheduling of construction to accommodate seasonal weather conditions.
The following chart presents certain quarterly operating data for our last twelve fiscal quarters and is indicative of this seasonality.
New Orders |
|
|
|
|
|
4thQ |
3rdQ |
2ndQ |
1stQ |
2004 |
4,276 |
4,869 |
5,032 |
3,304 |
2003 |
3,862 |
4,734 |
4,579 |
3,141 |
2002 |
3,731 |
4,227 |
3,142 |
2,510 |
Closings |
|
|
|
|
|
4thQ |
3rdQ |
2ndQ |
1stQ |
2004 |
5,098 |
4,061 |
3,684 |
3,608 |
2003 |
5,014 |
3,616 |
3,297 |
3,482 |
2002 |
4,839 |
3,960 |
2,439 |
2,365 |
Financial Results:
The following table provides additional details of revenues and certain expenses included in our consolidated statements of operations (in thousands).
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding (1) |
|
$ |
3,824,142 |
|
$ |
3,097,021 |
|
$ |
2,594,910 |
|
Land and lot sales |
|
|
44,702 |
|
|
39,069 |
|
|
18,051 |
|
Mortgage origination |
|
|
51,140 |
|
|
57,152 |
|
|
41,006 |
|
Intercompany elimination - mortgage |
|
|
(12,875 |
) |
|
(15,834 |
) |
|
(12,794 |
) |
Total revenue |
|
$ |
3,907,109 |
|
$ |
3,177,408 |
|
$ |
2,641,173 |
|
Cost of home construction and land sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding(1) |
|
$ |
3,069,976 |
|
$ |
2,515,015 |
|
$ |
2,152,757 |
|
Land and lot sales |
|
|
42,631 |
|
|
34,854 |
|
|
15,452 |
|
Intercompany elimination - mortgage |
|
|
(12,875 |
) |
|
(15,834 |
) |
|
(12,794 |
) |
Total cost of home construction and land sales |
|
$ |
3,099,732 |
|
$ |
2,534,035 |
|
$ |
2,155,415 |
|
Selling, general and administrative: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homebuilding operations |
|
$ |
397,601 |
|
$ |
325,657 |
|
$ |
269,655 |
|
Mortgage origination operations |
|
|
31,841 |
|
|
30,991 |
|
|
22,929 |
|
Total selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
429,442 |
|
$ |
356,648 |
|
$ |
292,584 |
|
(1) |
Homebuilding revenues for fiscal 2004 reflect the recognition on a consolidated basis of $4.1 million of revenues related to closings that occurred in fiscal 2003, but for which funding was not received until fiscal 2004. During fiscal 2003, revenues and related cost of sales were not recognized on those closings where the buyers' initial investments were not sufficient to recognize profit at the time of closing. We received funding on such closings pursuant to commitments from bond authority programs in early fiscal 2004, at which time we recognized the revenues and related cost of sales. |
Revenues:
The increase in homebuilding revenues for fiscal 2004 compared to fiscal 2003 is the result of an increase in the number of homes closed and increased average sales prices in most of our markets. The increases in both closings and average sales price were driven primarily by continued strong demand in most of our markets.
The increase in homebuilding revenues for fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002 is the result of an increase in the number of homes closed and increased average sales prices in most of our markets, as well as the inclusion for a full year of the Midwest region, which we entered with the acquisition of Crossmann in April 2002.
Cost of Home Construction and Land Sales:
Cost of Home Construction and Land Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
3,907,109 |
|
$ |
3,177,408 |
|
$ |
2,641,173 |
|
Cost of home construction and land sales |
|
$ |
3,099,732 |
|
$ |
2,534,035 |
|
$ |
2,155,415 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
20.2 |
% |
|
18.4 |
% |
Gross margin increased in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003 as a result of a strong pricing environment driven by robust demand and constraints on supply in many of our markets, combined with the realization of cost savings arising from the execution of our profit improvement initiatives. Fiscal 2004 gross margins also benefited from a higher percentage of revenues from our West and Mid-Atlantic regions, where margins are high relative to other markets. The fiscal 2004 margin improvement was achieved despite $43.9 million in warranty expenses associated with construction defect claims from water intrusion at one of our Midwest divisions.
Gross margin increased in fiscal 2003 as compared to fiscal 2002 as a result of our ability to raise prices in most markets combined with greater emphasis on focused profit improvement initiatives, including cost reductions resulting from improved efficiency and the negotiation of national and regional supply agreements. Fiscal 2003 gross margins also benefited from a higher percentage of revenues from California, where margins are high relative to other markets, while fiscal 2002 margins were negatively impacted by purchase accounting adjustments related to the Crossmann acquisition. The fiscal 2003 margin improvement was achieved despite higher warranty expenses associated with construction defect claims from water intrusion in the Midwest and inventory write-downs in the Southeast.
We executed several land sales during the past three fiscal years. We realized gross profits of $2.1 million, $4.2 million, and $2.6 million on these land sales in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense:
Selling, General and Administrative Expense as a Percentage of Total Revenue |
|
2004 |
11.0% |
2003 |
11.2% |
2002 |
11.1% |
During fiscal 2004, SG&A expense decreased as a percentage of revenue despite the inclusion of $12.3 million of marketing costs associated with our national branding initiative. The decrease is due primarily to benefits from scale as we leverage our overhead infrastructure through organic revenue growth.
During fiscal 2003, SG&A expense increased slightly as a percentage of revenue due primarily to higher management bonuses for fiscal 2003, the amount of which is related to the increase in our profits rather than our increase in revenue. In addition to increased management bonuses, fiscal 2003 SG&A included marketing costs incurred in preparation for the roll out of our national branding initiative launched in early fiscal 2004.
Mortgage Origination Operations
Number of Mortgages Originated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Beazer Mortgage originations |
|
|
9,633 |
|
|
10,139 |
|
|
8,882 |
|
Total closings |
|
|
16,151 |
|
|
15,409 |
|
|
13,603 |
|
Capture rate |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
66 |
% |
|
65 |
% |
Our capture rate (Beazer Mortgage originations as a percentage of total home closings) during fiscal 2004 decreased from 2003 due primarily to increased competition for new purchase mortgages driven by a slowdown in the refinance market.
During fiscal 2003, our capture rate increased over 2002 due primarily to an improved capture rate in our Midwest region.
Our capture rate is based on total closings. Our capture rate excluding non-financed closings was approximately 63% for fiscal 2004.
Income Taxes:
Income taxes for fiscal 2004 were provided at the effective rate of 39.0%. Income taxes for fiscal 2003 were provided at the effective rate of 39.5%. Income taxes for fiscal 2002 were provided at the effective rate of 39.3% (39% for the period prior to the Crossmann acquisition and 39.5% post acquisition). The principal difference between our effective rate and the U.S. Federal statutory rate is state income taxes.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:
We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates. We enter into derivative agreements to manage interest costs and hedge against risks associated with fluctuating interest rates. We do not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. During the year ended September 30, 2001 we entered into interest rate swap agreements (the Swap Agreements) to effectively fix the variable interest rate on $100 million of floating rate debt. The Swap Agreements mature in December 2004.
The Swap Agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges and accordingly, are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets and the related gains or losses are deferred in stockholders equity, net of taxes, as a component of other comprehensive income. Amounts to be received or paid as a result of the Swap Agreements are accrued and recognized as adjustments to interest related to the designated debt. The net effect of this accounting on our operating results is that interest on the variable-rate debt is generally recorded based on fixed interest rates. No portion of these hedges was considered ineffective for the year ended September 30, 2004. We expect to reclassify $610,000, net of taxes of $354,000, from other comprehensive loss to interest expense over the next twelve months.
As a result of the Swap Agreements, we have recorded a cumulative after-tax other comprehensive loss of $610,000 as of September 30, 2004. The estimated fair value of the Swap Agreements, based on current market rates, approximated $1 million at September 30, 2004 and is included in other liabilities.
Financial Condition And Liquidity:
At September 30, 2004, we had cash of $320.9 million, compared to $73.4 million at September 30, 2003. The increase in cash was primarily due to the issuance of $200 million of 6 1/2 % Senior Notes due 2013 and $180 million of 4 5/8 % Senior Notes due 2024. Our net cash used in operating activities for the year ended September 30, 2004 was $73.7 million, as increased net income and increases in accounts payable and other liabilities were offset by increased levels of inventory driven by higher year end backlog and anticipated future growth. Net cash used in investing activities was $30.5 million for fiscal 2004 as we invested $25.8 million in unconsolidated joint ventures to support our land acquisition strategy. Net cash provided by financing activities was $351.7 million in fiscal 2004, as proceeds from the
Senior Notes issuances discussed above were somewhat offset by common share repurchases and dividend payments of $17.5 million and $5.5 million, respectively.
Our net cash used in operating activities for the year ended September 30, 2003 was $41.0 million, as increased net income and increases in accounts payable and other liabilities were offset by increased levels of inventory driven by higher year end backlog and anticipated future growth. Net cash used in investing activities was $6.6 million for fiscal 2003. Net cash used in financing activities was $4.0 million in fiscal 2003 as proceeds from our term loan were used to pay off our existing term loan and 8 7/8% Senior Notes due 2008 (as discussed below), and proceeds from stock option exercises offset cash used for share repurchases.
In April 2002, we acquired Crossmann Communities for approximately $500.2 million, of which $308.6 million was paid through the issuance of 3.9 million shares of our common stock and $191.6 million was paid in cash. In connection with the merger, we also repaid approximately $125.4 million of Crossmann debt, resulting in total consideration paid of $625.6 million. The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to reflect the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired. The cash portion of the acquisition and repayment of Crossmann debt was funded with the proceeds from a Senior Note offering.
At September 30, 2004 we had the following long-term debt (in thousands):
Debt |
|
Due |
|
Amount |
|
4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes |
|
|
June 2024 |
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
6 1/2% Senior Notes |
|
|
November 2013 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
8 3/8% Senior Notes |
|
|
April 2012 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
8 5/8% Senior Notes |
|
|
May 2011 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
Term Loan |
|
|
June 2008 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
Other Notes Payable |
|
|
Various Dates |
|
|
22,067 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
|
|
|
(14,663 |
) |
Total |
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,137,404 |
|
In May 2004, we amended and restated our existing bank credit facility (the Credit Facility) to increase the banks commitments and extend the maturity date for one year. The amended Credit Facility includes a $550 million four-year revolving credit facility (the Revolving Credit Facility) and a $200 million four-year term loan (the Term Loan). The Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan now mature in June 2008. The Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan bear interest at a fluctuating rate (3.3% at September 30, 2004) based upon LIBOR or the alternate base rate of interest announced by our lead bank. The Credit Facility contains various operating and financial covenants. Each of our significant subsidiaries is a guarantor under the Credit Facility.
We fulfill our short-term cash requirements with cash generated from our operations and funds available from our unsecured Revolving Credit Facility. Available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are limited to certain percentages of homes under contract, unsold homes, substantially improved lots and accounts receivable. At September 30, 2004, we had no borrowings outstanding and available borrowings of $259.4 million under the Revolving Credit Facility.
We entered into Swap Agreements to manage interest costs and hedge against risks associated with fluctuating interest rates related to $100 million of floating rate debt. As of September 30, 2004, we had entered into interest rate swaps to effectively fix the interest rate (before spread) on $100 million in floating rate debt as follows: $75 million is fixed at 5.925% per annum; $10 million is fixed at 5.17% per annum; $5 million is fixed at 5.50% per annum; and $10 million is fixed at 5.055% per annum. The Swap Agreements expire in December 2004.
In June 2004, we issued $180 million aggregate principal amount of 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the Convertible Senior Notes) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In August 2004, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC covering resales of the Convertible Senior Notes and the common stock issuable upon conversion. The Convertible Senior Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs). Interest on the Convertible Senior Notes is payable semiannually beginning December 2004. Beginning with the six-month interest period commencing on June 15, 2009, we will pay contingent interest during a six-month interest period if the average trading pric
e of the notes for a five trading day reference period equals or exceeds 120% of the principal amount of the notes. The notes are convertible by holders into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 6.48 shares of Beazer Homes common stock per $1,000 principal amount (subject to adjustment for customary reasons), representing an initial conversion price of $154.32 per share of common stock, under the following circumstances: a) during any calendar quarter, if the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the previous calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 120% of the conversion price on such last trading day; b) subject to certain limitations, during the five consecutive trading days after any five consecutive trading days in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each day of that period is less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale
price of our common stock and the conversion rate of the notes on each such day, provided that if the price of our common stock issuable upon conversion is between 100% and 120% of the conversion price, holders will be entitled to receive upon conversion only the value of the principal amount of the notes converted plus accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest and additional amounts owed, if any, c) if the notes have been called for redemption, d) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions, e) during any period in which the credit rating assigned to the notes by either Moodys or S&P is lower than B1 or B+, respectively, or the notes are no longer rated by at least one of these rating services or their successors.
We may, at our option, redeem for cash the Convertible Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time on or after June 15, 2009, initially at 101.321% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after June 15, 2011. Holders have the right to require us to purchase all or any portion of the Convertible Senior Notes for cash on June 15, 2011, June 15, 2014 and June 15, 2019, or if we undergo a fundamental change, as defined. In each case, we will pay a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest, if any, and any additional amounts owed, if any, to such purchase date.
In November 2003, we issued $200 million 6 1/2 % Senior Notes due November 2013 (the Original Notes) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Original Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs). In May 2004 we completed an offer to exchange all of the outstanding Original Notes for an equal amount of 6 1/2 % Senior Notes due November 2013 (the 6 ½% Senior Notes), which were registered under the Securities Act of 1933. Interest on the 6 1/2 % Senior Notes is payable semiannually. We may, at our option, redeem the 6 1/2 % Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after November 2008, initially at 103.250% of the principal amount, decl
ining to 100% of the principal amount after November 2011. We may redeem the 6 1/2 % Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time before November 2008 at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof plus a make-whole premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest. A portion of such notes may also be redeemed prior to November 2006 under certain conditions.
In April 2002, we issued $350 million 8 3/8% Senior Notes due April 2012 (the Original Notes) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In September 2002, we completed an offer to exchange all of the outstanding Original Notes for an equal amount of 8 3/8 Senior Notes due 2012 (the 8 3/8% Senior Notes), which were registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The terms of the 8 3/8% Senior Notes were substantially identical to the terms of the Original Notes. The Original Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs). Interest on the 8 3/8% Senior Notes is payable semiannually. We may, at our option, redeem the 8 3/8% Senior Notes in whole or in pa
rt at any time after April 2007, initially at 104.188% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after April 2010. A portion of such notes may also be redeemed prior to April 2005 under certain conditions. We used the proceeds from the issuance of the 8 3/8 % Senior Notes to fund the cash portion of the Crossmann acquisition, to repay Crossmanns outstanding net indebtedness, to reduce borrowings under our revolving credit facility at the time, and to pay related fees, commissions and other expenses.
In May 2001, we issued $200 million 8 5/8% Senior Notes due May 2011 (the 8 5/8% Senior Notes) at a price of 99.178% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs). Interest on the 8 5/8% Senior Notes is payable semiannually. We may, at our option, redeem the 8 5/8% Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after May 2006, initially at 104.3125% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after May 2009.
During fiscal 2003, we retired our $100 million 8 7/8% Senior Notes due in 2008 (the 8 7/8% Senior Notes). The 8 7/8% Senior Notes were redeemed at 104.438% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest. As a result of the redemption of the 8 7/8% Senior Notes, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $7.6 million, which includes the write off of previously capitalized fees.
The Convertible Senior Notes, the 6 ½ % Senior Notes, the 8 3/8% Senior Notes and the 8 5/8% Senior Notes (collectively the Senior Notes) are unsecured obligations ranking pari passu with all other existing and future senior indebtedness. All of our significant subsidiaries are full and unconditional guarantors of the Senior Notes and our obligations under the Credit Facility, and are jointly and severally liable for obligations under the Senior Notes and the Credit Facility. Each guarantor subsidiary is a 100% owned subsidiary of Beazer Homes. Neither the Credit Facility nor the Senior Notes restrict distributions to Beazer Homes by its subsidiaries. At September 30, 2004, we were in compliance with all covenants related to the Credit Facility and Senior Notes. At September 30, 2004, under the mos
t restrictive covenants of each indenture, approximately $289.7 million of our retained earnings were available for cash dividends and for share repurchases.
In February 2003, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan authorizing the purchase of up to one million shares of our outstanding common stock. During fiscal 2004, we repurchased 179,800 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $17.5 million or approximately $98 per share pursuant to the plan. During fiscal 2003, we repurchased 128,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $6.9 million or approximately $54 per share pursuant to the plan. At September 30, 2004, we were authorized to purchase up to 692,200 additional shares pursuant to the plan. During fiscal 2002, certain officers and employees transferred to us 31,072 shares of our common stock, valued at prevailing market prices. The transfers, made to satisfy such officers and employees tax obligations under certain stock incentiv
e plans, were accounted for as a stock repurchase by the Company. The Company has since discontinued the practice of allowing officers and employees to settle tax obligations through the transfer of stock to the Company.
During fiscal 2004, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per common share, or a total of approximately $5.5 million. No dividends were paid during fiscal years 2003 or 2002.
We attempt to control half or more of our land supply through options. At September 30, 2004, we controlled 90,571 lots (a 5.5 year supply based on fiscal 2004 closings), with 42,145 lots owned and 48,426 lots under option. We expect to exercise all of our option contracts with specific performance obligations and, subject to market conditions, substantially all of our option contracts without specific performance obligations. As a result of the flexibility that these options provide us, upon a change in market conditions, we may renegotiate the terms of the options prior to their ultimate exercise.
Land Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lots |
|
Percentage |
|
Owned |
|
|
42,145 |
|
|
47 |
% |
Optioned |
|
|
48,426 |
|
|
53 |
% |
Total |
|
|
90,571 |
|
|
100 |
% |
In January 2000, we filed a $300 million universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to the filing, we may, from time to time over an extended period, offer new debt or equity securities. This shelf registration allows us to expediently access capital markets periodically. Our $200 million 8 5/8% Senior Notes were sold pursuant to this registration statement. The timing and amount of future offerings, if any, will depend on market and general business conditions.
We believe that our cash on hand and current borrowing capacity at September 30, 2004 and anticipated cash flows from operations are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Commitments:
We acquire certain lots by means of option contracts. Option contracts generally require the payment of cash for the right to acquire lots during a specified period of time at a certain price. Under option contracts, both with and without specific performance provisions, purchase of the properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us and the sellers. Our obligation with respect to options with specific performance provisions is included on our consolidated balance sheets in other liabilities. Under option contracts without specific performance obligations, our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the non-refundable deposits, letters of credit and other non-refundable amounts incurred, which aggregated approximately $180.7 million at September 30, 2004. This amount includes letter
s of credit of approximately $57.8 million. Below is a summary of amounts, net of cash deposits, committed under all options at September 30, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
Aggregate Exercise Price of Options |
|
Options with specific performance |
|
$ |
28,184 |
|
Options without specific performance |
|
|
1,763,158 |
|
Total options |
|
$ |
1,791,342 |
|
We expect to exercise all of our option contracts with specific performance obligations and, subject to market conditions, substantially all of our option contracts without specific performance obligations. Various factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as market conditions, weather conditions and the timing of the completion of development activities, can have a significant impact on the timing of option exercises. Under their current terms, and assuming no significant changes in market conditions or other factors, we expect to exercise our land options as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
397,314 |
|
2006 |
|
|
583,068 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
810,960 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,791,342 |
|
We have historically funded the exercise of land options though a combination of operating cash flows and borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. We expect these sources to continue to be adequate to fund anticipated future option exercises. Therefore, we do not anticipate that the exercise of our land options will have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.
Certain of our option contracts are with sellers who are deemed to be Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) under FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46). FIN 46 defines a VIE as an entity with insufficient equity investment to finance its planned activities without additional financial support or an entity in which the equity investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Pursuant to FIN 46, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses or receives a majority of the expected residual returns of a VIE is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and must consolidate the VIE.
We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts. Our risk is generally limited to the option deposits that we pay, and creditors of the sellers generally have no recourse to the general credit of the Company. Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land, for those option contracts for which we are the primary beneficiary, we are required to consolidate the land under option at fair value. We believe that the exercise prices of our option contracts approximate their fair value. Our consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2004 and 2003 reflect consolidated inventory not owned of $254.8 million and $35.7 million, respectively. Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned totaled $219.0 million at September 30, 2004 and $30.5 million at September 3
0, 2003. The difference between the balances of consolidated inventory not owned and obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned represents cash deposits paid under the option agreements. The increase in consolidated inventory not owned and the related obligations is due primarily to the transition provisions of FIN 46, which applied immediately to VIEs created after January 31, 2003 and with respect to variable interests held before February 1, 2003 applied beginning with our quarter ended March 31, 2004. The above disclosures of amounts committed under options include our obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned.
We participate in a number of land development joint ventures in which we have less than a controlling interest. We enter into joint ventures in order to acquire attractive land positions, to manage our risk profile and to leverage our capital base. Our joint ventures are typically entered into with developers and other homebuilders to develop finished lots for sale to the joint ventures members and other third parties. We account for our interest in these joint ventures under the equity method. Our consolidated balance sheets include investments in joint ventures totaling $44.7 million and $26.6 million at September 30, 2004 and 2003 respectively.
Our joint ventures typically obtain secured acquisition, development and construction financing. At September 30, 2004, our unconsolidated joint ventures had borrowings outstanding totaling $128.1 million. In some instances, we and our joint venture partners have provided varying levels of guarantees of debt of our unconsolidated joint ventures. At September 30, 2004, we had repayment guarantees of $10 million and loan-to-value maintenance guarantees of $56.8 million of debt of unconsolidated joint ventures. Repayment guarantees require us to repay our share of debt of unconsolidated joint ventures in the event the joint venture defaults on its obligations under the borrowings. Loan-to-value maintenance guarantees require us to repay our share of the ventures borrowings to the extent such borrowings exceed a
specified percentage of the value of the property securing the loan.
The following summarizes our aggregate contractual commitments at September 30, 2004:
|
|
Payments Due by Period (in Thousands) |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
Less than 1 year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
More than 5 years |
|
Long-Term Debt (1) |
|
$ |
1,782,457 |
|
$ |
92,479 |
|
$ |
153,281 |
|
$ |
340,744 |
|
$ |
1,195,953 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Operating Leases |
|
|
41,133 |
|
|
10,462 |
|
|
16,145 |
|
|
10,020 |
|
|
4,506 |
|
Purchase Obligations(2) |
|
|
28,184 |
|
|
8,809 |
|
|
17,698 |
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
- |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,851,774 |
|
$ |
111,750 |
|
$ |
187,124 |
|
$ |
352,441 |
|
$ |
1,200,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Represents our Senior Notes, Term Loan and Other Notes Payable, and related interest payments. Interest on variable rate obligations is based on rates effective as of September 30, 2004.
|
(2) Represents obligations under option contracts with specific performance provisions, net of cash deposits. |
We had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds of approximately $45.9 million and $351.3 million, respectively, at September 30, 2004 related principally to our obligations to local governments to construct roads and other improvements in various developments in addition to the letters of credit of approximately $57.8 million relating to our land option contracts discussed above. We do not believe that any such letters of credit or bonds are likely to be drawn upon.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:
In September 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-8: The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings Per Share (EITF 04-8). The consensus was ratified by the FASB in October 2004. EITF 04-8 requires that shares issuable upon conversion of contingently convertible debt instruments (Co-Cos) be included in diluted earnings per share computations using the if-converted method regardless of whether the issuers stock price exceeds the contingent conversion price. Prior to EITF 04-8, shares issuable upon conversion of CoCos were generally excluded from diluted earnings per share computations until the issuers stock price excee
ded the contingent conversion price. EITF 04-8, which applies to our 4 5/8 % Convertible Senior Notes issued in June 2004, is expected to be effective for reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2004, the first quarter of our fiscal 2005. Restatement of prior period earnings per share amounts presented for comparative purposes will be required. If we had reported fiscal 2004 diluted earnings per share under EITF 04-8, we would have reported earnings of $16.77 per diluted share, as compared to reported earnings of $17.09 per diluted share.
Outlook:
Absent any unanticipated adverse changes, our outlook for fiscal 2005 diluted earnings per share is in the range of $20.00 - $21.00 per share. This outlook reflects inclusion of 1,166,400 shares issuable upon conversion of the Companys convertible Senior Notes in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2005, in accordance with the EITF 04-8 The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share, which is currently expected to be effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:
This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events, and it is possible that the results described in this annual report will not be achieved. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of statements that include words such as estimate, project, believe, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, foresee, likely, will, goal, target or other similar words or phrases. All forward-looking statements are based upon information available to us on the date of this annual repo
rt. Except as may be required under applicable law, we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements, including, among other things, the matters discussed in this annual report in the sections captioned Outlook and Financial Condition and Liquidity. Additional information about factors that could lead to material changes in performance is contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such factors may include:
|
· |
economic changes nationally or in our local markets; |
|
· |
volatility of mortgage interest rates and inflation; |
|
· |
shortages of skilled labor or raw materials used in the production of houses; |
|
· |
increased prices for labor, land and raw materials used in the production of houses; |
|
· |
increased land development costs on projects under development; |
|
· |
the cost and availability of insurance, including the availability of insurance for the presence of mold; |
|
· |
the impact of construction defect and home warranty claims; |
|
· |
any delays in reacting to changing consumer preference in home design; |
|
· |
terrorist acts and other acts of war; |
|
· |
changes in consumer confidence; |
|
· |
delays or difficulties in implementing initiatives to reduce our production and overhead cost structure; |
|
· |
delays in land development or home construction resulting from adverse weather conditions; |
|
· |
potential delays or increased costs in obtaining necessary permits as a result of changes to, or complying with, laws, regulations, or governmental policies; |
|
· |
changes in accounting policies, standards, guidelines or principles, as may be adopted by regulatory agencies as well as the Financial Accounting Standards Board; |
|
· |
the failure of our improvement plan for the Midwest to achieve desired results; or |
|
· |
other factors over which we have little or no control. |
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such factors.
Item 7(a). Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to a number of market risks in the ordinary course of business. Our primary market risk exposure relates to fluctuations in interest rates. We do not believe that our exposure in this area is material to cash flows or earnings. During fiscal 2001, we entered into interest rate Swap Agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $100 million to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on $100 million of variable rate debt. These swaps effectively fix the rate on this debt at 5.74%. We do not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
We have formally designated these agreements as cash flow hedges as discussed in Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements. The estimated fair value of the Swap Agreements, based on current market rates, was approximately $1million at September 30, 2004 and is included in other liabilities.
The estimated fair value of our fixed rate debt at September 30, 2004 was $1,010.2 million, compared to a carrying value of $915.3 million. In addition, the effect of a hypothetical one percentage point decrease in interest rates would increase the estimated fair value of the fixed rate debt instruments from $1,010.2 million to $1,079.5 million at September 30, 2004.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidated Statements of Income |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
3,907,109 |
|
$ |
3,177,408 |
|
$ |
2,641,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home construction and land sales |
|
|
3,099,732 |
|
|
2,534,035 |
|
|
2,155,415 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
429,442 |
|
|
356,648 |
|
|
292,584 |
|
Expenses related to retirement of debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,570 |
|
|
- |
|
Operating income |
|
|
377,935 |
|
|
279,155 |
|
|
193,174 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
2,338 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
7,079 |
|
|
4,777 |
|
|
6,547 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
386,575 |
|
|
285,529 |
|
|
202,059 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
150,764 |
|
|
112,784 |
|
|
79,425 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
235,811 |
|
$ |
172,745 |
|
$ |
122,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
13,293 |
|
|
12,886 |
|
|
10,535 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
13,801 |
|
|
13,514 |
|
|
11,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
17.74 |
|
$ |
13.41 |
|
$ |
11.64 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
17.09 |
|
$ |
12.78 |
|
$ |
10.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share: |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
320,880 |
|
$ |
73,372 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
70,574 |
|
|
66,003 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned inventory |
|
|
2,089,330 |
|
|
1,687,809 |
|
Consolidated inventory not owned |
|
|
254,765 |
|
|
35,674 |
|
Total inventory |
|
|
2,344,095 |
|
|
1,723,483 |
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
44,748 |
|
|
26,569 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
47,052 |
|
|
26,160 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
24,671 |
|
|
19,185 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
251,603 |
|
|
251,603 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
45,839 |
|
|
25,659 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
3,149,462 |
|
$ |
2,212,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
123,287 |
|
$ |
125,521 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
437,608 |
|
|
320,996 |
|
Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned |
|
|
219,042 |
|
|
30,457 |
|
Term Loan |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
Senior Notes (net of discount of $14,663 and $8,635 respectively) |
|
|
915,337 |
|
|
541,365 |
|
Other Notes Payable |
|
|
22,067 |
|
|
- |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,917,341 |
|
|
1,218,339 |
|
Stockholders' Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock (par value $.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorized, no shares issued) |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Common stock (par value $.01 per share, 30,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
authorized, 17,868,349 and 17,501,052 issued, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,730,473 and 13,542,976 outstanding) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
175 |
|
Paid in capital |
|
|
593,749 |
|
|
572,070 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
741,701 |
|
|
511,349 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost (4,137,876 and 3,958,076 shares) |
|
|
(88,150 |
) |
|
(70,604 |
) |
Unearned restricted stock |
|
|
(14,748 |
) |
|
(15,852 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
(3,443 |
) |
Total Stockholders' Equity |
|
|
1,232,121 |
|
|
993,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
|
$ |
3,149,462 |
|
$ |
2,212,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
Common |
|
Paid in |
|
Retained |
|
Treasury |
|
Restricted |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Stock |
|
Stock |
|
Loss |
|
Total |
|
Balance, September 30, 2001 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
124 |
|
$ |
202,121 |
|
$ |
215,970 |
|
$ |
(61,510 |
) |
$ |
(2,027 |
) |
$ |
(3,483 |
) |
$ |
351,195 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,634 |
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of tax of $845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,294 |
) |
|
(1,294 |
) |
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,340 |
|
Amortization of unearned restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercises of stock options (298,907 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,162 |
|
Issuance of Bonus Stock (53,328 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 |
|
Tax benefit from stock transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,235 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock (79,337 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,281 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Stock issued for Crossmann acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,8571,166 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
308,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,573 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock (31,072 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance, September 30, 2002 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
167 |
|
|
535,460 |
|
|
338,604 |
|
|
(63,679 |
) |
|
(6,260 |
) |
|
(4,777 |
) |
|
799,515 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,745 |
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of tax of $871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
1,334 |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,079 |
|
Amortization of unearned restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,984 |
|
Exercises of stock options (462,506 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
9,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,805 |
|
Issuance of Bonus Stock (97,231 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
Tax benefit from stock transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,502 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock (215,642 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
13,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchase of treasury stock (128,000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,925 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance, September 30, 2003 |
|
|
- |
|
|
175 |
|
|
572,070 |
|
|
511,349 |
|
|
(70,604 |
) |
|
(15,852 |
) |
|
(3,443 |
) |
|
993,695 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,811 |
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of tax of $1,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
|
2,833 |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,644 |
|
Dividends Paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
Amortization of unearned restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,381 |
|
Change in fair value of unearned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Exercises of stock options (259,467 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
5,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,362 |
|
Tax benefit from stock transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,127 |
|
Issuance of Bonus Stock (68,137 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,917 |
|
Issuance of restricted stock (39,693 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,736 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchase of treasury stock (179,800 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,546 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance, September 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
179 |
|
$ |
593,749 |
|
$ |
741,701 |
|
$ |
(88,150 |
) |
$ |
(14,748 |
) |
$ |
(610 |
) |
$ |
1,232,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
235,811 |
|
$ |
172,745 |
|
$ |
122,634 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided/(used) by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,755 |
|
|
13,220 |
|
|
9,453 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,570 |
|
|
- |
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
(22,740 |
) |
|
87 |
|
|
(6,613 |
) |
Tax benefit from stock transactions |
|
|
8,127 |
|
|
11,502 |
|
|
12,235 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
(1,597 |
) |
|
(2,338 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net of effects from acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
|
(4,571 |
) |
|
(11,674 |
) |
|
(13,601 |
) |
Increase in inventory |
|
|
(410,525 |
) |
|
(328,893 |
) |
|
(152,990 |
) |
Decrease/(increase) in other assets |
|
|
(16,828 |
) |
|
(1,431 |
) |
|
17,949 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in trade accounts payable |
|
|
(2,234 |
) |
|
16,967 |
|
|
23,481 |
|
Increase in other liabilities |
|
|
123,210 |
|
|
79,257 |
|
|
48,300 |
|
Other changes |
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
954 |
|
Net cash provided/(used) by operating activities |
|
|
(73,719 |
) |
|
(41,049 |
) |
|
59,464 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(10,271 |
) |
|
(9,325 |
) |
|
(8,213 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,800 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
(25,844 |
) |
|
(4,941 |
) |
|
(3,146 |
) |
Distributions from and proceeds from sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
5,639 |
|
|
7,714 |
|
|
12,736 |
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(320,810 |
) |
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(30,476 |
) |
|
(6,552 |
) |
|
(314,633 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Term Loan |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
- |
|
Repayment of Term Loan |
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
- |
|
Redemption of 8 7/8% Senior Notes |
|
|
- |
|
|
(104,438 |
) |
|
- |
|
Proceeds from issuance of 8 3/8% Senior Notes |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
343,000 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of 6 1/2% Senior Notes |
|
|
198,100 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds from issuance of 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes |
|
|
174,600 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(3,354 |
) |
|
(2,458 |
) |
|
(7,513 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
9,805 |
|
|
5,162 |
|
Common share repurchases |
|
|
(17,546 |
) |
|
(6,925 |
) |
|
(2,169 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities |
|
|
351,703 |
|
|
(4,016 |
) |
|
338,480 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
247,508 |
|
|
(51,617 |
) |
|
83,311 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
73,372 |
|
|
124,989 |
|
|
41,678 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
320,880 |
|
$ |
73,372 |
|
$ |
124,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
65,237 |
|
$ |
67,580 |
|
$ |
37,178 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
170,475 |
|
$ |
77,904 |
|
$ |
81,534 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock related to acquisition |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
308,573 |
|
Consolidated inventory not owned |
|
$ |
188,585 |
|
$ |
30,457 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Land acquired through issuance of notes payable |
|
$ |
21,502 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization- Beazer Homes USA, Inc. is one of the ten largest homebuilders in the United States based on number of homes closed. We design, sell and build primarily single-family homes in over 35 markets located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia. We also provide mortgage origination services for our homebuyers through Beazer Mortgage Corporation, or Beazer Mortgage. In addition, we provide title services to our homebuyers in many of our markets.
Presentation - Our homebuilding operations conducted across several geographic regions of the United States have similar characteristics; therefore, they have been aggregated into one reportable segment-the homebuilding segment.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Beazer Homes USA, Inc., and our wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents -- We consider investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Inventory - Owned inventory consists solely of residential real estate developments. Interest, real estate taxes and development costs are capitalized in inventory during the development and construction period. Sold units are expensed on a specific identification basis or on a relative sales value basis as cost of sales.
Consolidated inventory not owned represents the fair value of land under option agreements consolidated pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46.
Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures - We participate in a number of land development joint ventures in which we have less than a controlling interest. Our joint ventures are typically entered into with developers and other homebuilders to develop finished lots for sale to the joint ventures members and other third parties. We account for our interest in these joint ventures under the equity method. We recognize our share of profits from the sale of lots to other buyers. Our share of profits
from lots we purchase from the joint ventures are deferred and treated as a reduction of the cost of the land purchased from the joint venture. Such profits are subsequently recognized at the time the home closes and title passes to the homebuyer.
Our joint ventures typically obtain secured acquisition, development and construction financing. At September 30, 2004, our unconsolidated joint ventures had borrowings outstanding totaling $128.1 million. In some instances, we and our joint venture partners have provided varying levels of guarantees of debt of our unconsolidated joint ventures. At September 30, 2004, we had repayment guarantees of $10 million and loan-to-value maintenance guarantees of $56.8 million of debt of unconsolidated joint ventures. Repayment guarantees require us to repay our share of debt of unconsolidated joint ventures in the event the joint venture defaults on its obligations under the borrowings. Loan-to-value maintenance guarantees require us to repay our share of the ventures borrowings to the extent such borrowings exceed a
specified percentage of the value of the property securing the loan.
Property, Plant and Equipment - Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight line basis at rates based on estimated useful lives as follows:
Buildings |
15 years |
Machinery and equipment |
3 - 12 years |
Information systems |
3 - 5 years |
Furniture and fixtures |
3 - 5 years |
Impairment of Long Lived Assets - Housing projects and unimproved land held for future development (components of inventory) and property, plant and equipment are reviewed for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If these assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of
the assets.
Goodwill - Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired. We test goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that more likely than not reduce the value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. Each of our operating divisions is considered a reporting unit. The fair value of each reporting unit is determined based on expected discounted future cash flows. If the carrying amount of a repo
rting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired. If goodwill is considered impaired, the impairment loss to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds implied fair value of that goodwill. We performed our annual impairment test of goodwill as of April 30, 2004. For purposes of our annual goodwill impairment test, we obtained independent valuations of our reporting units. Based on comparison of those independent valuations to the carrying values of our reporting units at April 30, 2004, we determined that goodwill was not impaired.
Other Assets - Other assets include prepaid expenses, debt issuance costs and deferred compensation plan assets.
Income Taxes - Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting carrying values and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
Other Liabilities - Other liabilities include homebuyer deposits, land purchase obligations, accrued compensation, accrued warranty costs and various other accrued expenses.
Income Recognition and Classification of Costs - Income from the sale of residential units or land parcels is recognized when closings have occurred and the risk of ownership is transferred to the buyer. Sales commissions are included in selling, general and administrative expense.
Fees paid to Beazer Mortgage from third party lenders are recognized as revenue concurrent with the closing on the sale of the residential unit. All expenses of operating Beazer Mortgage are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the period incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expense.
Estimated future warranty costs are charged to cost of sales in the period when the revenues from home closings are recognized. Such estimated warranty costs generally range from 0.5% to 1.0% of total revenue. Additional warranty costs are charged to cost of sales as necessary based on management's estimate of the costs to remediate existing claims. See Note 14 for a more detailed discussion of warranty costs and related reserves.
Advertising costs of $44,696,000, $34,775,000, and $28,237,000 for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, are expensed as incurred.
Earnings Per Share - The computation of basic earnings per common share is determined by dividing net income applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share additionally gives effect (when dilutive) to stock options and other stock based awards and other potentially dilutive securities.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The historical carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents and our Term Loan are reasonable estimates of their fair value. The fair value of our publicly held Senior Notes (Note 8) is estimated based on the quoted bid prices for these debt instruments and was approximately $1,010.2 million at September 30, 2004 and $593.0 million at September 30, 2003. The fair values of our interest rate swaps, based on current rates, approximated $1.0 million at September 30, 2004 and $5.6 million at September 30, 2003, and is included in other liabilities.
Stock-based Compensation - We account for stock awards granted to employees under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No compensation expense is recognized for stock options granted to employees because all stock options granted have exercise prices not less than the market value of our stock on the date of the grant. Restricted stock granted to employees is valued based on the market price of the common stock on the date of the grant.
We account for stock awards issued to non-employees under the recognition and measurement principles of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18: Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. Stock options issued to non-employees are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Restricted stock granted to non-employees is initially valued based on the market price of the common stock on the date of the grant.
Unearned compensation arising from the restricted stock granted to employees and from non-employee stock awards is amortized to expense using the straight-line method over the period of the restrictions. The balance of unearned compensation related to non-employee awards is adjusted on a quarterly basis to reflect changes in the market value of Beazer Homes common stock. Unearned compensation is shown as a reduction of stockholders equity in the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table illustrates the effect (in thousands, except per share amounts) on net earnings and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation as amended by SFAS No. 148 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, to stock-based employee compensation:
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
235,811 |
|
$ |
172,745 |
|
$ |
122,634 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects |
|
|
4,503 |
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
1,443 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
|
(7,521 |
) |
|
(5,409 |
) |
|
(3,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
232,793 |
|
$ |
169,746 |
|
$ |
121,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic - as reported |
|
$ |
17.74 |
|
$ |
13.41 |
|
$ |
11.64 |
|
Basic - pro forma |
|
$ |
17.51 |
|
$ |
13.17 |
|
$ |
11.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted - as reported |
|
$ |
17.09 |
|
$ |
12.78 |
|
$ |
10.74 |
|
Diluted - pro forma |
|
$ |
16.97 |
|
$ |
12.65 |
|
$ |
10.66 |
|
The weighted average fair value of each option granted during the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003, and 2002 was $40.81, $32.89 and $38.30, respectively. The fair values of options granted were estimated on the date of their grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following weighted average assumptions:
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Expected volatility |
44.14% |
|
46.70% |
|
40.70% |
Expected dividend yield |
0.40% |
|
none |
|
none |
Risk-free interest rate |
3.13% |
|
3.60% |
|
4.90% |
Expected life (in years) |
5.0 |
|
7.0 |
|
7.0 |
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications -- Certain items in prior-period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - In September 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-8: The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings Per Share (EITF 04-8). The consensus was ratified by the FASB in October 2004. EITF 04-8 requires that shares issuable upon conversion of contingently convertible debt instruments (Co-Cos) be included in diluted earnings per share computations using the if-converted method regardless of whether the issuers stock price exceeds the contingent conversion price. Prior to EITF 04-8, shares issuable upon c
onversion of CoCos were generally excluded from diluted earnings per share computations until the issuers stock price exceeded the contingent conversion price. EITF 04-8, which applies to our 4 5/8 % Convertible Senior Notes issued in June 2004, is expected to be effective for reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2004, the first quarter of our fiscal 2005. Restatement of prior period earnings per share amounts presented for comparative purposes will be required. If we had reported fiscal 2004 diluted earnings per share under EITF 04-8, we would have reported earnings of $16.77 per diluted share, as compared to reported earnings of $17.09 per diluted share.
(2) Acquisitions
Effective April 17, 2002, Beazer Homes acquired Crossmann Communities, Inc. (Crossmann). Crossmann built single-family homes in Indiana - its home base - with operations in Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina and Tennessee. This acquisition represented our entry into the Midwest region and strengthened our focus on the first-time homebuyer segment. We have included Crossmanns operating results in our consolidated financial statements since April 1, 2002.
The aggregate merger consideration we paid totaled approximately $500.2 million and consisted of approximately 3.9 million shares of Beazer Homes common stock (approximately $308.6 million) and approximately $191.6 million in cash. In connection with the merger, we also repaid approximately $125.4 million of Crossmann debt, resulting in total consideration paid of $625.6 million. The cash portion of the merger consideration and the repayment of Crossmann debt upon the merger were funded from net proceeds of our issuance of $350 million 8 3/8% Senior Notes due 2012 in a private placement on April 17, 2002.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase; accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to reflect the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired. Under this method, Crossmann assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded on our balance sheet at their fair market value as of April 1, 2002. This resulted in an inventory write-up to fair value of $26.9 million and a write-down of fixed assets to fair value of $1.1 million. This acquisition resulted in approximately $239.9 million of goodwill, none of which is deductible for income tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in thousands):
Inventory |
|
$ |
357,801 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
9,085 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
239,919 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
61,722 |
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
668,527 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
31,455 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
59,600 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
63,641 |
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
154,696 |
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
513,831 |
|
The following unaudited pro forma financial data (in thousands, except per share amounts) gives effect to our acquisition of Crossmann as if it had occurred on the first day of fiscal 2002 (the year of acquisition). The pro forma financial data is provided for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been obtained if the acquisition had been effected at that date.
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
3,046,841 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
141,753 |
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
11.37 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
10.62 |
|
(3) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates. We enter into derivative agreements to manage interest costs and hedge against risks associated with fluctuating interest rates. We do not enter into or hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. During the year ended September 30, 2001, we entered into interest rate swap agreements (the Swap Agreements) to effectively fix the variable interest rate on $100 million of floating rate debt. The Swap Agreements mature in December 2004.
The Swap Agreements have been designated as cash flow hedges and accordingly, are recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets and the related gains or losses are deferred in stockholders equity, net of taxes, as a component of other comprehensive income. Amounts to be received or paid as a result of the Swap Agreements are accrued and recognized as adjustments to interest related to the designated debt. The net effect of this accounting on our operating results is that interest on the variable-rate debt is generally recorded based on fixed interest rates. No portion of these hedges was considered ineffective for the year ended September 30, 2004. We expect to reclassify approximately $610,000, net of taxes of $354,000, from other comprehensive loss to interest expense over the next twelve months
.
As a result of the Swap Agreements, we have recorded a cumulative after-tax other comprehensive loss of $610,000 as of September 30, 2004. The estimated fair value of the Swap Agreements, based on current market rates, approximated $1 million at September 30, 2004 and is included in other liabilities.
(4) Inventory
Inventory consists of (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Homes under construction. |
|
$ |
847,517 |
|
$ |
658,909 |
|
Development projects in progress |
|
|
1,105,933 |
|
|
919,257 |
|
Unimproved land held for future development |
|
|
57,563 |
|
|
33,583 |
|
Model homes |
|
|
78,317 |
|
|
76,060 |
|
Consolidated inventory not owned |
|
|
254,765 |
|
|
35,674 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,344,095 |
|
$ |
1,723,483 |
|
Homes under construction include homes finished and ready for delivery and homes in various stages of construction. We had 345 ($69.1 million) and 362 ($58.3 million) completed homes that were not subject to a sales contract, not including model homes, at September 30, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
Development projects in progress consist principally of land and land improvement costs. Certain of the fully developed lots in this category are reserved by a deposit or sales contract.
Inventory located in California, the state with our largest concentration of inventory, was $400.6 million and $323.8 million at September 30, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
We acquire certain lots by means of option contracts. Option contracts generally require the payment of cash for the right to acquire lots during a specified period of time at a certain price. Under option contracts, both with and without specific performance provisions, purchase of the properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us and the sellers. Our obligation with respect to options with specific performance provisions is included on our consolidated balance sheets in other liabilities. Under option contracts without specific performance obligations, our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the non-refundable deposits, letters of credit and other non-refundable amounts incurred, which aggregated approximately $180.7 million at September 30, 2004. This amount includes letter
s of credit of approximately $57.8 million. Below is a summary of amounts, net of cash deposits, committed under all options at September 30, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
Aggregate Exercise |
|
|
|
Price of |
|
|
|
Options |
|
Options with specific performance |
|
$ |
28,184 |
|
Options without specific performance |
|
|
1,763,158 |
|
Total options |
|
$ |
1,791,342 |
|
We expect to exercise all of our option contracts with specific performance obligations and, subject to market conditions, substantially all of our option contracts without specific performance obligations. Various factors, some of which are beyond our control, such as market conditions, weather conditions and the timing of the completion of development activities, can have a significant impact on the timing of option exercises. Under their current terms, and assuming no significant changes in market conditions or other factors, we expect to exercise our land options as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
397,314 |
|
2006 |
|
|
583,068 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
810,960 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,791,342 |
|
Certain of our option contracts are with sellers who are deemed to be Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) under FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46). FIN 46 defines a VIE as an entity with insufficient equity investment to finance its planned activities without additional financial support or an entity in which the equity investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Pursuant to FIN 46, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses or receives a majority of the expected residual returns of a VIE is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and must consolidate the VIE.
We have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts. Our risk is generally limited to the option deposits that we pay, and creditors of the sellers generally have no recourse to the general credit of the Company. Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land, for those option contracts for which we are the primary beneficiary, we are required to consolidate the land under option at fair value. We believe that the exercise prices of our option contracts approximate their fair value. Our consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2004 and 2003 reflect consolidated inventory not owned of $254.8 million and $35.7 million, respectively. Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned totaled $219.0 million at September 30, 2004 and $30.5 million at September 3
0, 2003. The difference between the balances of consolidated inventory not owned and obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned represents cash deposits paid under the option agreements. The increase in consolidated inventory not owned and the related obligations is due primarily to the transition provisions of FIN 46, which applied immediately to VIEs created after January 31, 2003 and with respect to variable interests held before February 1, 2003 applied beginning with our quarter ended March 31, 2004. The above disclosures of amounts committed under options include our obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned.
(5) Interest
Information regarding interest (in thousands) is as follows:
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Capitalized interest in inventory, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beginning of year |
|
$ |
34,285 |
|
$ |
24,441 |
|
$ |
16,271 |
|
Interest incurred and capitalized |
|
|
76,035 |
|
|
65,295 |
|
|
51,171 |
|
Capitalized interest amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to cost of sales |
|
|
(66,199 |
) |
|
(55,451 |
) |
|
(43,001 |
) |
Capitalized interest in inventory, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year |
|
$ |
44,121 |
|
$ |
34,285 |
|
$ |
24,441 |
|
(6) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consists of (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Land and buildings |
|
$ |
5,464 |
|
$ |
1,011 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
7,100 |
|
|
5,429 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
20,459 |
|
|
18,954 |
|
Information systems |
|
|
17,226 |
|
|
14,608 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
13,307 |
|
|
13,960 |
|
|
|
|
63,556 |
|
|
53,962 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(38,885 |
) |
|
(34,777 |
) |
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
24,671 |
|
$ |
19,185 |
|
(7) Credit Facility
In May 2004 we amended and restated our existing bank credit facility (the Credit Facility) to increase the banks commitments and extend the maturity date for one year. The amended Credit Facility includes a $550 million four-year revolving credit facility (the Revolving Credit Facility) and a $200 million four-year term loan (the Term Loan). The Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan now mature in June 2008. The Revolving Credit Facility and the Term Loan bear interest at a fluctuating rate (3.3% at September 30, 2004) based upon LIBOR or the alternate base rate of interest announced by our lead bank. The Credit Facility contains various operating and financial covenants. Each of our significant subsidiaries is a guarantor under the Credit Facility.
Available borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are limited to certain percentages of homes under contract, unsold homes, substantially improved lots and accounts receivable. At September 30, 2004 we had no borrowings outstanding, and had available borrowings of $259.4 million under the Revolving Credit Facility.
As discussed in Note 3, we entered into Swap Agreements to manage interest costs and hedge against risks associated with fluctuating interest rates related to $100 million of floating rate debt. As of September 30, 2004, we had entered into interest rate swaps to effectively fix the interest rate (before spread) on $100 million in floating rate debt as follows: $75 million is fixed at 5.925% per annum; $10 million is fixed at 5.17% per annum; $5 million is fixed at 5.50% per annum; and $10 million is fixed at 5.055% per annum. The Swap Agreements expire in December 2004.
(8) Senior Notes
In June 2004, we issued $180 million aggregate principal amount of 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 (the Convertible Senior Notes) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In August 2004 we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC covering resales of the Convertible Senior Notes and the common stock issuable upon conversion. The Convertible Senior Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs). Interest on the Convertible Senior Notes is payable semiannually beginning December 2004. Beginning with the six-month interest period commencing on June 15, 2009, we will pay contingent interest during a six-month interest period if the average trading price
of the notes for a five trading day reference period equals or exceeds 120% of the principal amount of the notes. The notes are convertible by holders into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 6.48 shares of Beazer Homes common stock per $1,000 principal amount (subject to adjustment for customary reasons), representing an initial conversion price of $154.32 per share of common stock, under the following circumstances: a) during any calendar quarter, if the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days during the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the previous calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 120% of the conversion price on such last trading day; b) subject to certain limitations, during the five consecutive trading days after any five consecutive trading days in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each day of that period is less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale p
rice of our common stock and the conversion rate of the notes on each such day, provided that if the price of our common stock issuable upon conversion is between 100% and 120% of the conversion price, holders will be entitled to receive upon conversion only the value of the principal amount of the notes converted plus accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest and additional amounts owed, if any, c) if the notes have been called for redemption, d) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions, e) during any period in which the credit rating assigned to the notes by either Moodys or S&P is lower than B1 or B+, respectively, or the notes are no longer rated by at least one of these rating services or their successors.
We may, at our option, redeem for cash the Convertible Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time on or after June 15, 2009, initially at 101.321% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after June 15, 2011. Holders have the right to require us to purchase all or any portion of the Convertible Senior Notes for cash on June 15, 2011, June 15, 2014 and June 15, 2019 or if we undergo a fundamental change, as defined. In each case, we will pay a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest, if any, and any additional amounts owed, if any, to such purchase date.
In November 2003, we issued $200 million 6 1/2 % Senior Notes due November 2013 (the Original Notes) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In May 2004 we completed an offer to exchange all of the outstanding Original Notes for an equal amount of 6 1/2 % Senior Notes due November 2013 (the 6 1/2 % Senior Notes), which were registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The 6 1/2 % Senior Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs). Interest on the 6 1/2 % Senior Notes is payable semiannually. We may, at our option, redeem the 6 1/2 % Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after November 2008, initially at 103.250% of the principal amount,
declining to 100% of the principal amount after November 2011. We may redeem the 6 1/2 % Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time before November 2008 at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof plus a make-whole premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest. A portion of such notes may also be redeemed prior to November 2006 under certain conditions.
In April 2002, we issued $350 million 8 3/8% Senior Notes due April 2012 (the Original Notes) in a private placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In September 2002 we completed an offer to exchange all of the outstanding Original Notes for an equal amount of 8 3/8 Senior Notes due 2012 (the 8 3/8% Senior Notes), which were registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The terms of the 8 3/8% Senior Notes were substantially identical to the terms of the Original Notes. The Original Notes were issued at a price of 100% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs). Interest on the 8 3/8% Senior Notes is payable semiannually. We may, at our option, redeem the 8 3/8% Senior Notes in whole or in part
at any time after April 2007, initially at 104.188% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after April 2010. A portion of such notes may also be redeemed prior to April 2005 under certain conditions. We used the proceeds from the issuance of the 8 3/8 % Senior Notes to fund the cash portion of the Crossmann acquisition, to repay Crossmanns outstanding net indebtedness, to reduce borrowings under our revolving credit facility at the time, and to pay related fees, commissions and other expenses.
In May 2001, we issued $200 million 8 5/8% Senior Notes due May 2011 (the 8 5/8% Senior Notes) at a price of 99.178% of their face amount (before underwriting discount and other issuance costs). Interest on the 8 5/8% Senior Notes is payable semiannually. We may, at our option, redeem the 8 5/8% Senior Notes in whole or in part at any time after May 2006, initially at 104.3125% of the principal amount, declining to 100% of the principal amount after May 2009.
During fiscal 2003, we retired our $100 million 8 7/8% Senior Notes due in 2008 (the 8 7/8% Senior Notes.) The 8 7/8% Senior Notes were redeemed at 104.438% of the principal amount, plus accrued interest. As a result of the redemption of the 8 7/8% Senior Notes, we recorded a pre-tax charge of $7.6 million, which includes the write off of previously capitalized fees.
The Convertible Senior Notes, the 6 ½ % Senior Notes, the 8 3/8% Senior Notes and the 8 5/8% Senior Notes (collectively the Senior Notes) are unsecured obligations ranking pari passu with all other existing and future senior indebtedness. All of our significant subsidiaries are full and unconditional guarantors of the Senior Notes and our obligations under the Credit Facility, and are jointly and severally liable for obligations under the Senior Notes, and the Credit Facility. Each guarantor subsidiary is a 100% owned subsidiary of Beazer Homes.
The indentures under which the Senior Notes were issued contain certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on payment of dividends. At September 30, 2004, under the most restrictive covenants of each indenture, approximately $289.7 million of our retained earnings was available for cash dividends and for share repurchases. Each indenture provides that, in the event of defined changes in control or if our consolidated tangible net worth falls below a specified level or in certain circumstances upon a sale of assets, we are required to offer to repurchase certain specified amounts of outstanding Senior Notes.
As of September 30, 2004, future maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending September 30, |
2005 |
|
$ |
17,811 |
|
2006 |
|
|
4,256 |
|
2007 |
|
|
- |
|
2008 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
2009 |
|
|
- |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
930,000 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,152,067 |
|
(9) Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes consists of (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
153,228 |
|
$ |
106,871 |
|
$ |
78,709 |
|
State |
|
|
22,427 |
|
|
16,261 |
|
|
13,566 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
(24,891 |
) |
|
(10,348 |
) |
|
(12,850 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
150,764 |
|
$ |
112,784 |
|
$ |
79,425 |
|
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the federal income tax statutory rate as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Income tax computed at statutory rate |
|
$ |
135,298 |
|
$ |
99,935 |
|
$ |
70,721 |
|
State income taxes, net of federal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefit |
|
|
16,226 |
|
|
12,764 |
|
|
8,524 |
|
Other |
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
85 |
|
|
180 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
150,764 |
|
$ |
112,784 |
|
$ |
79,425 |
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are composed of the following (in thousands):
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Deferred Tax Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty and other reserves. |
|
$ |
40,900 |
|
$ |
19,352 |
|
Incentive compensation |
|
|
7,377 |
|
|
3,752 |
|
Property, equipment and other assets |
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
3,604 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
354 |
|
|
2,203 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
767 |
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
52,468 |
|
|
29,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory valuation |
|
|
(5,416 |
) |
|
(3,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Asset |
|
$ |
47,052 |
|
$ |
26,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that based upon our history of profitable operations, it is more likely than not that our net deferred tax asset will be realized.
(10) Leases
We are obligated under various non-cancelable operating leases for office facilities and equipment. Rental expense under these agreements amounted to approximately $14,116,000, $11,562,000 and $9,654,000 for the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. As of September 30, 2004, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating lease agreements are as follows: (in thousands):
Year Ending September 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
10,462 |
|
2006 |
|
|
9,049 |
|
2007 |
|
|
7,096 |
|
2008 |
|
|
5,770 |
|
2009 |
|
|
4,250 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
4,506 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
41,133 |
|
(11) Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Stock - We currently have no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Common Stock Repurchase Plan- In February 2003, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase plan authorizing the purchase of up to one million shares of our outstanding common stock. During fiscal 2004, we repurchased 179,800 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $17.5 million or approximately $98 per share pursuant to the plan. During fiscal 2003, we repurchased 128,000 shares for an aggregate purchase price of $6.9 million or approximately $54 per share pursuant to the plan. At September 30, 2004, we are authorized to purchase up to 692,200 additional shares pursuant to the plan.
Shareholder Rights Plan - In June 1996, our Board of Directors adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan and distributed a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a Right) to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the Junior Preferred Shares), of Beazer Homes. The Rights become exercisable in certain limited circumstances involving principally the acquisition of over 20% of our outstanding common stock by any one individual or group. The Rights are initially exercisable at a price of $80 per one hundredth of a Junior Preferred Share subject to adjustment. Fo
llowing certain other events after the Rights have become exercisable, each Right entitles its holder to purchase at the Rights then-current exercise price, a number of shares of our common stock having a market value of twice such price, or, in certain circumstances, securities of the acquirer, having a then-current market value of two times the exercise price of the Right.
The Rights are redeemable and may be amended at our option before they become exercisable. Until a Right is exercised, the holder of a Right has no rights as a shareholder of Beazer Homes. The Rights expire in June 2006.
Dividends - During fiscal 2004, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per common share, or a total of approximately $5.5 million. No dividends were paid during fiscal years 2003 or 2002.
(12) Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
235,811 |
|
$ |
172,745 |
|
$ |
122,634 |
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
13,293 |
|
|
12,886 |
|
|
10,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
17.74 |
|
$ |
13.41 |
|
$ |
11.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
235,811 |
|
$ |
172,745 |
|
$ |
122,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
13,293 |
|
|
12,886 |
|
|
10,535 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
243 |
|
|
252 |
|
|
364 |
|
Options to acquire common stock |
|
|
265 |
|
|
376 |
|
|
516 |
|
Diluted weighted average number of common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares outstanding |
|
|
13,801 |
|
|
13,514 |
|
|
11,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
17.09 |
|
$ |
12.78 |
|
$ |
10.74 |
|
Options to purchase 137,326 and 143,898 shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares during those years.
In September 2004 the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 04-8: The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings Per Share (EITF 04-8). The consensus was ratified by the FASB in October 2004. EITF 04-8 requires that shares issuable upon conversion of contingently convertible debt instruments (Co-Cos) be included in diluted earnings per share computations using the if-converted method regardless of whether the issuers stock price exceeds the contingent conversion price. Prior to EITF 04-8, shares issuable upon conversion of CoCos were generally excluded from diluted earnings per share computations until the issuers stock price exceeded the contingent conversion price. EITF 04-8, whic
h applies to our 4 5/8 % Convertible Senior Notes issued in June 2004, is expected to be effective for reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2004, the first quarter of our fiscal 2005. Restatement of prior period earnings per share amounts presented for comparative purposes will be required. If we had reported fiscal 2004 diluted earnings per share under EITF 04-8, we would have reported earnings of $16.77 per diluted share.
(13) Retirement Plan and Incentive Awards
401(k) Retirement Plan - We sponsor a 401(k) Plan (the "Plan). Substantially all employees are eligible for participation in the Plan after completing one month of service with us. Participants may defer and contribute to the Plan from 1% to 80% of their salary with certain limitations on highly compensated individuals. We match 50% of the first 6% of the participant's contributions. The participant's contributions vest 100% immediately, while our contributions vest over five years. Our total contributions for the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were approximately $2,764,000, $2,022,000 and $1,851,000, respectively.
Deferred Compensation Plan- During fiscal 2002, we adopted the Beazer Homes USA, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the DCP Plan). The DCP Plan is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for a select group of executives and highly compensated employees. The Plan allows the executives to defer current compensation on a pre-tax basis to a future year, up until termination of employment. The objectives of the Plan are to assist executives with fi
nancial planning and capital accumulation and to provide the Company with a method of attracting, rewarding, and retaining highly compensated executives. Participation in the plan is voluntary. Beazer Homes may voluntarily make a contribution to the participants DCP accounts. For the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, Beazer Homes contributed $2,814,000, $626,000 and $284,000, respectively, to the DCP Plan.
Stock Incentive Plans - During fiscal 2000, we adopted the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1999 Plan) because the shares reserved under the 1994 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1994 Plan) had been substantially depleted. We also have the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the Non-Employee Director Plan). At September 30, 2004, we had reserved 3,975,000 shares of common stock for issuance under our various stock incentive plans, of which 1,007,348 shares are available for future grants.
Stock Option Awards - We have issued various stock option awards to officers and key employees under both the 1999 Plan and the 1994 Plan and to non-employee directors pursuant to the Non-Employee Director Plan. Stock options are generally exercisable at the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date, vest three years after the date of grant and may be exercised thereafter until their expiration, subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment as provided in the applicable plan. Stock options granted prior to fiscal 2004, generally expire on the tenth anniversary from the date such options were granted. Stock options granted in fiscal 2004 expire on the s
eventh anniversary from the date such options were granted.
Stock Option Awards - Information regarding activity under our stock option plans is summarized as follows:
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
792,715 |
|
$ |
41.48 |
|
|
1,070,880 |
|
$ |
28.37 |
|
|
1,230,540 |
|
$ |
19.62 |
|
Granted |
|
|
103,388 |
|
$ |
98.72 |
|
|
214,577 |
|
$ |
62.21 |
|
|
166,245 |
|
|
75.1 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(259,467 |
) |
$ |
20.66 |
|
|
(462,506 |
) |
$ |
21.69 |
|
|
(298,907 |
) |
|
18.46 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(29,368 |
) |
$ |
69.21 |
|
|
(30,236 |
) |
$ |
47.40 |
|
|
(26,998 |
) |
|
27.1 |
|
Options outstanding at end of year |
|
|
607,268 |
|
$ |
58.78 |
|
|
792,715 |
|
$ |
41.48 |
|
|
1,070,880 |
|
$ |
28.37 |
|
Options exercisable at end of year |
|
|
199,620 |
|
$ |
21.76 |
|
|
455,087 |
|
$ |
20.69 |
|
|
390,537 |
|
$ |
19.86 |
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2004:
|
Stock Options Outstanding |
Stock Options Exercisable |
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number Outstanding |
Weighted Average Contractual Remaining Life (Years) |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number Excercisable |
Weighted Average Escercise Price |
$18-$24 |
199,620 |
5.41 |
$21.76 |
199,620 |
$21.76 |
$56-$63 |
177,228 |
8.10 |
62.15 |
- |
- |
$74-$87 |
130,562 |
7.57 |
80.30 |
- |
- |
$97-$99 |
99,858 |
6.32 |
98.72 |
- |
- |
|
607,268 |
|
|
199,620 |
|
Other Stock Awards - We have made various restricted stock awards to officers and key employees under both the 1999 Plan and the 1994 Plan. All restricted stock is awarded in the name of the participant, who has all the rights of other common stockholders with respect to such stock, subject to restrictions and forfeiture provisions. Accordingly, such restricted stock awards are considered outstanding shares. Restricted stock awards vest from three to seven years after the date of grant. Certain restricted stock awards provide for accelerated vesting if certain performance goals are achieved. Co
mpensation expense recognized for such awards totaled $5,581,000, $3,984,000 and $2,365,000 for the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively.
Activity relating to restricted stock awards is summarized as follows:
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Restricted shares, beginning of year |
|
|
292,953 |
|
|
88,337 |
|
|
134,625 |
|
Shares awarded |
|
|
47,948 |
|
|
215,642 |
|
|
79,337 |
|
Shares forfeited |
|
|
(6,229 |
) |
|
(2,026 |
) |
|
- |
|
Shares vested |
|
|
- |
|
|
(9,000 |
) |
|
(125,625 |
) |
Restricted shares, end of year |
|
|
334,672 |
|
|
292,953 |
|
|
88,337 |
|
We have an incentive compensation plan (called the Value Created Incentive Plan), modeled under the concepts of economic profit or economic value added. Participants may defer a portion of their earned annual incentive compensation under the plan The deferred amounts are represented by restricted stock units (Bonus Stock), each of which represent the right to recieve one share of Beazer Homes common stock upon vesting. Such shares are issued after a three-year vesting period, subject to an election for further deferral by the participant. The number of restricted stock units granted is based on a disvount to the market value of our common stock at the time the bonus is earned. Should the participants employment terminate during the vesting period, the deferred incentive compensation is se
ttled in cash or cash and stock, depending on the cause of termination.
Activity relating to Bonus Stock is as follows:
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Bonus Stock issuable, beginning of year |
|
|
128,404 |
|
|
209,158 |
|
|
237,362 |
|
Shares awarded |
|
|
36,833 |
|
|
22,847 |
|
|
28,029 |
|
Shares forfeited |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
(6,370 |
) |
|
(2,905 |
) |
Shares vested and issued |
|
|
(68,137 |
) |
|
(97,231 |
) |
|
(53,328 |
) |
Bonus Stock issuable, end of year |
|
|
96,388 |
|
|
128,404 |
|
|
209,158 |
|
Our former Chief Financial Officer resigned effective September 30, 2003. Effective October 1, 2003, Beazer Homes and our former CFO entered into a consulting and non-compete agreement pursuant to which our former CFO will retain and continue to vest in various stock awards during the two year life of the agreement which would have otherwise been forfeited upon termination, representing up to 46,409 shares of the Companys common stock. Our consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2004 and 2003 include $2,050,000 and $3,100,000, respectively, of unearned compensation cost reflecting the fair value of the stock awards as of each balance sheet date. Such unearned compensation cost, as adjusted by changes in the value of the Companys common stock, is being recognized over the two year life of the consul
ting and non-compete agreement. Compensation expense recognized for such awards totaled $1,800,000 for the year ended September 30, 2004.
(14) Contingencies
Trinity Claims - We and certain of our subsidiaries have been and continue to be named as defendants in various construction defect claims, complaints and other legal actions that include claims related to moisture intrusion and mold. We have experienced a significant number of such claims in our Midwestern region and particularly with respect to homes built by Trinity Homes LLC, a subsidiary we acquired in the Crossmann acquisition in 2002.
As of September 30, 2004, there were eleven pending lawsuits related to such complaints received by Trinity. Ten of these involve suits by individual homeowners, and the cost to resolve these matters is not expected to be material, either individually or in the aggregate. One of these suits is a class action suit that was filed in the State of Indiana in August 2003. The parties in the class action engaged in a series of mediation conferences which resulted in an agreement for a proposed settlement of the case. The parties submitted settlement documents to the court, which the court preliminarily approved on August 6, 2004. A Fairness Hearing was held on October 18, 2004 and the court approved the settlement agreement on October 20, 2004.
The settlement class includes, with certain exclusions, the current owners of all Trinity homes that have brick veneer, where the closing of Trinitys initial sale of the home took place between June 1, 1998 and October 31, 2002. The settlement agreement establishes an agreed protocol and process for assessment and remediation of any external water intrusion issues at the homes which includes, among other things, that the homes will be repaired at Trinitys expense. The settlement agreement also provides for plaintiffs attorneys fees and for Trinity to pay an agreed amount per home for engineering inspection costs for each home for which a claim is filed under the settlement.
Under the settlement, subject to Trinitys timely performance of the specified assessments and remediation activities for homeowners who file claims, each homeowner releases Trinity, Beazer Homes Investment Corp. and other affiliated companies, including Beazer Homes, from the claims asserted in the class action lawsuit, claims arising out of external water intrusion, and claims of improper brick installation, including property damage claims, loss or diminution of property value claims, and most personal injury claims, among others. There was a 30-day timeframe, which ended on November 19, 2004, to appeal the courts order approving the settlement. No appeals were received by the court within the timeframe established. The Company expects to send out the claims notices on or about December 20, 2004
, and the class members will have 60 days to file claims.
Our warranty reserves at September 30, 2004 and 2003 include accruals for our estimated costs to assess and remediate all homes for which Trinity had received complaints related to moisture intrusion and mold, including a provision for legal fees. Our warranty reserves at September 30, 2004 also include a provision for estimated plaintiffs attorneys fees and for engineering inspection costs related to the settlement discussed above. It is probable that we have incurred additional losses relating to the remediation of homes of class members from whom we have not yet received complaints. However, due to the uncertainty surrounding the number of claims that will ultimately be filed and the average cost to remediate such claims, we cannot estimate the possible loss or range of loss at this time. Therefore,
we have not accrued any costs to remediate homes for which we have not yet received complaints. As we receive and evaluate claims pursuant to the settlement, we will accrue our estimated costs to resolve those claims. We expect to know substantially the number of claims that will ultimately be filed pursuant to the settlement during the second quarter of our fiscal 2005.
The following is a roll-forward of total complaints received, on which our accruals were based:
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Complaints outstanding at beginning of year |
|
|
415 |
|
|
16 |
|
Complaints received during the year |
|
|
564 |
|
|
399 |
|
Complaints resolved during the year |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
- |
|
Complaints outstanding at end of year |
|
|
887 |
|
|
415 |
|
The cost to assess and remediate a home depends on the extent of moisture damage, if any, that the home has incurred. We classify homes for which we receive complaints into one of three categories: 1) homes with no moisture damage, 2) homes with isolated moisture damage or 3) homes with extensive moisture damage. For purposes of calculating our accrual we estimated the cost to assess and remediate homes to cover a range up to $63,500 per home, depending on the category to which it was assigned.
As of September 30, 2004 and 2003 we accrued for our estimated cost to remediate homes that we had assessed and assigned to one of the above categories, as well as our estimated cost to remediate those homes for which we had received complaints, but for which we had not yet performed assessments. For purposes of our accrual, we assigned homes not yet assessed to categories based on our expectations about the extent of damage and trends observed from the results of assessments performed to date.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we increased our estimated costs to remediate homes within each category. We also changed our classifications of homes not yet assessed to reflect our expectations that a greater number of homes than previously estimated will have extensive moisture damage. We updated these assumptions based on the results of remediation work and assessments completed to date and cost estimates from subcontractors. As a result of these changes in estimate, we increased our reserves for existing claims by approximately $12,300,000. We also accrued $3,300,000 for new claims received during the quarter, for a total pre-tax charge of $15,600,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2004.
During fiscal 2004, we initiated a program under which we offered to repurchase a limited number of homes from specific homeowners. As of September 30, 2004 we have repurchased 53 homes at an aggregate purchase price of $17,461,769. We have an agreement to repurchase one more home, which concludes this repurchase program. Our accrual at September 30, 2004 includes our estimated costs to sell homes that we have repurchased and which we have agreed to repurchase, and our estimated losses on the sale of those homes. As of September 30, 2004, we have not sold any of the homes that we have repurchased under this program.
Changes in our accrual for Trinity moisture intrusion and related mold issues during the period were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
$ |
730 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
43,858 |
|
|
15,523 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(10,885 |
) |
|
(7,053 |
) |
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
42,173 |
|
$ |
9,200 |
|
Our accruals at September 30, 2004 and 2003 represent our best estimates of the costs to resolve all asserted complaints. Actual costs to assess and remediate homes in each category, the extent of damage to homes not yet assessed, our estimates of costs to sell repurchased homes, and our losses on such sales could differ from our estimates. As a result, the costs to resolve existing complaints could differ from our recorded accruals and have a material adverse effect on our net income in the periods in which the matters are resolved. Additionally, it is reasonably possible that we will incur additional losses related to these matters, including additional losses related to homes for which we have not yet received complaints. However, the amount or range of such losses cannot be determined at this time.<
/DIV>
Warranty Reserves- We provide a limited warranty (ranging from one to two years) of workmanship and materials with each of our homes. Such warranty covers defects in plumbing, electrical, heating, cooling and ventilating systems and construction defects. In addition, we provide a warranty (ranging from a minimum of ten years up to the period covered by the applicable statute of repose) with each of our homes, covering construction defects only. Since we subcontract our homebuilding work to subcontractors who generally provide us with an indemnity and a certificate of insurance prior to receiving payments for their work, claims relating to workmanship and materials are generally the primary responsibility of our subcontractors.
As noted above, our warranty reserves at September 30, 2004 and 2003 include accruals for Trinity moisture intrusion and related mold issues. Warranty reserves are included in accrued expenses in the consolidated financial statements. We record reserves covering our anticipated warranty expense for each home closed. Management reviews the adequacy of warranty reserves each reporting period based on historical experience and managements estimate of the costs to remediate the claims and adjusts these provisions accordingly. While we believe that our warranty reserves are adequate, there can be no assurances that historical data and trends will accurately predict our actual warranty costs or that future developments might not lead to a significant change in the reserve.
Changes in our warranty reserves, which include amounts related to the Trinity moisture intrusion and mold issues discussed above, during the period are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
40,473 |
|
$ |
25,527 |
|
$ |
16,464 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
80,291 |
|
|
39,244 |
|
|
24,883 |
|
Payments |
|
|
(34,601 |
) |
|
(24,298 |
) |
|
(15,820 |
) |
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
86,163 |
|
$ |
40,473 |
|
$ |
25,527 |
|
Other Contingencies - We had outstanding letters of credit and performance bonds of approximately $45.9 million and $351.3 million, respectively, at September 30, 2004 related principally to our obligations to local governments to construct roads and other improvements in various developments in addition to the letters of credit of approximately $57.8 million relating to our land option contracts discussed in Note 4. We do not believe that any such letters of credit or bonds are likely to be drawn upon.
We and certain of our subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other legal actions. In our opinion, except as discussed above, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
(15) Supplemental Guarantor Information
As discussed in Note 8, the Companys obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest under certain debt are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by substantially all of its subsidiaries. The guarantees are full and unconditional and the guarantor subsidiaries are 100% owned by Beazer Homes USA, Inc. The Company has determined that separate, full financial statements of the guarantors would not be material to investors and, accordingly, supplemental financial information for the guarantors is presented.
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidating Balance Sheet |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
Homes |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Homes |
|
ASSETS |
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Adjustments |
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
392,110 |
|
$ |
(71,569 |
) |
$ |
339 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
320,880 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
- |
|
|
70,237 |
|
|
337 |
|
|
- |
|
|
70,574 |
|
Owned inventory |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,079,494 |
|
|
- |
|
|
9,836 |
|
|
2,089,330 |
|
Consolidated inventory not owned |
|
|
|
|
|
254,765 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
254,765 |
|
Investment in unconsoldited joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
44,748 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
44,748 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
47,052 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
47,052 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
24,671 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
24,671 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
- |
|
|
251,603 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
251,603 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,468,078 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,468,078 |
) |
|
- |
|
Intercompany |
|
|
566,216 |
|
|
(583,038 |
) |
|
16,822 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Other assets |
|
|
19,432 |
|
|
17,881 |
|
|
8,526 |
|
|
- |
|
|
45,839 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
2,492,888 |
|
$ |
2,088,792 |
|
$ |
26,024 |
|
$ |
(1,458,242 |
) |
$ |
3,149,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
123,174 |
|
$ |
113 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
123,287 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
146,473 |
|
|
276,242 |
|
|
11,057 |
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
437,608 |
|
Intercompany |
|
|
(1,043 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned |
|
|
- |
|
|
219,042 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
219,042 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Term Loan |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
200,000 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
915,337 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
915,337 |
|
Other notes payable |
|
|
- |
|
|
22,067 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
22,067 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,260,767 |
|
|
640,525 |
|
|
12,213 |
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
1,917,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity |
|
|
1,232,121 |
|
|
1,448,267 |
|
|
13,811 |
|
|
(1,462,078 |
) |
|
1,232,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
|
$ |
2,492,888 |
|
$ |
2,088,792 |
|
$ |
26,024 |
|
$ |
(1,458,242 |
) |
$ |
3,149,462 |
|
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidating Balance Sheet |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
Homes |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Homes |
|
|
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Adjustments |
|
USA, Inc. |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
110,754 |
|
$ |
(40,079 |
) |
$ |
2,697 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
73,372 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
- |
|
|
64,620 |
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
- |
|
|
66,003 |
|
Owned inventory |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,677,965 |
|
|
- |
|
|
9,844 |
|
|
1,687,809 |
|
Consolidated inventory not owned |
|
|
- |
|
|
35,674 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
35,674 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,569 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,569 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
26,160 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,160 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
19,166 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
- |
|
|
19,185 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
- |
|
|
251,603 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
251,603 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries |
|
|
1,246,831 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(1,246,831 |
) |
|
- |
|
Intercompany |
|
|
403,945 |
|
|
(415,211 |
) |
|
11,266 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Other assets |
|
|
11,085 |
|
|
9,018 |
|
|
5,556 |
|
|
- |
|
|
25,659 |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,798,775 |
|
$ |
1,629,325 |
|
$ |
20,921 |
|
$ |
(1,236,987 |
) |
$ |
2,212,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
125,099 |
|
$ |
422 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
125,521 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
64,963 |
|
|
242,503 |
|
|
9,642 |
|
|
3,888 |
|
|
320,996 |
|
Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned |
|
|
- |
|
|
30,457 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
30,457 |
|
Intercompany |
|
|
(1,248 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Term Loan |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
200,000 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
541,365 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
541,365 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
805,080 |
|
|
398,059 |
|
|
11,312 |
|
|
3,888 |
|
|
1,218,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity |
|
|
993,695 |
|
|
1,231,266 |
|
|
9,609 |
|
|
(1,240,875 |
) |
|
993,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
|
$ |
1,798,775 |
|
$ |
1,629,325 |
|
$ |
20,921 |
|
$ |
(1,236,987 |
) |
$ |
2,212,034 |
|
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidating Statement of Income |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
Homes |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Homes |
|
|
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Adjustments |
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3,899,971 |
|
$ |
7,138 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3,907,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home construction and land sales |
|
|
76,035 |
|
|
3,023,697 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
3,099,732 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
- |
|
|
436,726 |
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
(9,836 |
) |
|
429,442 |
|
Expenses related to retirement of debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(76,035 |
) |
|
439,548 |
|
|
4,586 |
|
|
9,836 |
|
|
377,935 |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,561 |
|
Other income/(expense), net |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,079 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,079 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
(76,035 |
) |
|
448,188 |
|
|
4,586 |
|
|
9,836 |
|
|
386,575 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(29,654 |
) |
|
174,794 |
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
150,764 |
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
282,192 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(282,192 |
) |
|
- |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
235,811 |
|
$ |
273,394 |
|
$ |
2,798 |
|
$ |
(276,192 |
) |
$ |
235,811 |
|
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidating Statement of Income |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
Homes |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Homes |
|
|
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Adjustments |
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3,169,765 |
|
$ |
7,643 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3,177,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home construction and land sales |
|
|
65,295 |
|
|
2,478,059 |
|
|
525 |
|
|
(9,844 |
) |
|
2,534,035 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
- |
|
|
354,088 |
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
- |
|
|
356,648 |
|
Expenses related to retirement of debt |
|
|
7,570 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(72,865 |
) |
|
337,618 |
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
9,844 |
|
|
279,155 |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,597 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,777 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
(72,865 |
) |
|
343,965 |
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
9,844 |
|
|
285,529 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(28,782 |
) |
|
135,867 |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
3,888 |
|
|
112,784 |
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
216,828 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(216,828 |
) |
|
- |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
172,745 |
|
$ |
208,098 |
|
$ |
2,774 |
|
$ |
(210,872 |
) |
$ |
172,745 |
|
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidating Statement of Income |
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
Homes |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Homes |
|
|
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Adjustments |
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,635,619 |
|
$ |
5,554 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,641,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home construction and land sales |
|
|
51,171 |
|
|
2,112,261 |
|
|
153 |
|
|
(8,170 |
) |
|
2,155,415 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
- |
|
|
290,533 |
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
- |
|
|
292,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
(51,171 |
) |
|
232,825 |
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
8,170 |
|
|
193,174 |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,338 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,338 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,509 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,547 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
(51,171 |
) |
|
241,672 |
|
|
3,388 |
|
|
8,170 |
|
|
202,059 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(20,114 |
) |
|
94,997 |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
79,425 |
|
Equity in income of subsidiaries |
|
|
153,691 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(153,691 |
) |
|
- |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
122,634 |
|
$ |
146,675 |
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
$ |
(148,732 |
) |
$ |
122,634 |
|
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows |
|
September 30, 2004 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
Homes |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Homes |
|
|
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Adjustments |
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Net cash provided/(used) by operating activities |
|
$ |
12,169 |
|
$ |
(88,774 |
) |
$ |
2,886 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(73,719 |
) |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
- |
|
|
(10,271 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(10,271 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
(25,844 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(25,844 |
) |
Distributions from and proceeds from sale of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,639 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,639 |
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
(30,476 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(30,476 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds of Term Loan |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
200,000 |
|
Repayment of Term Loan |
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of 6 1/2% Senior Notes |
|
|
198,100 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
198,100 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes |
|
|
174,600 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
174,600 |
|
Advances to/from subsidiaries |
|
|
(82,516 |
) |
|
87,760 |
|
|
(5,244 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Debt Issuance Cost |
|
|
(3,354 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(3,354 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
5,362 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,362 |
|
Common share repurchases |
|
|
(17,546 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(17,546 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities |
|
|
269,187 |
|
|
87,760 |
|
|
(5,244 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
351,703 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
281,356 |
|
|
(31,490 |
) |
|
(2,358 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
247,508 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
110,754 |
|
|
(40,079 |
) |
|
2,697 |
|
|
- |
|
|
73,372 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
392,110 |
|
$ |
(71,569 |
) |
$ |
339 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
320,880 |
|
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows |
|
September 30, 2003 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
Homes |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Homes |
|
|
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Adjustments |
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Net cash provided/(used) by operating activities |
|
$ |
(11,140 |
) |
$ |
(32,990 |
) |
$ |
3,081 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(41,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
- |
|
|
(9,309 |
) |
|
(16 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(9,325 |
) |
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4,941 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(4,941 |
) |
Distributions from and proceeds from sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,714 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,714 |
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
(6,536 |
) |
|
(16 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(6,552 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Term Loan |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
200,000 |
|
Repayment of Term Loan |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
Redemption of 8 7/8% Senior Notes |
|
|
(104,438 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(104,438 |
) |
Advances (to) from subsidiaries |
|
|
(21,445 |
) |
|
25,206 |
|
|
(3,761 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(2,458 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(2,458 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
9,805 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
9,805 |
|
Common share repurchases |
|
|
(6,925 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(6,925 |
) |
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities |
|
|
(25,461 |
) |
|
25,206 |
|
|
(3,761 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(4,016 |
) |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(36,601 |
) |
|
(14,320 |
) |
|
(696 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(51,617 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
147,355 |
|
|
(25,759 |
) |
|
3,393 |
|
|
- |
|
|
124,989 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
110,754 |
|
$ |
(40,079 |
) |
$ |
2,697 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
73,372 |
|
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. |
|
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows |
|
September 30, 2002 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beazer |
|
|
|
Homes |
|
Guarantor |
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
Consolidating |
|
Homes |
|
|
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Subsidiaries |
|
Adjustments |
|
USA, Inc. |
|
Net cash provided/(used) by operating activities |
|
$ |
(18,717 |
) |
$ |
71,291 |
|
$ |
6,890 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
59,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
- |
|
|
(8,213 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(8,213 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,800 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
(3,146 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(3,146 |
) |
Distributions from and proceeds from sale |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
of unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
- |
|
|
12,736 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
12,736 |
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
- |
|
|
(320,810 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(320,810 |
) |
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
- |
|
|
(314,633 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(314,633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 8 3/8% Senior Notes |
|
|
343,000 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
343,000 |
|
Advances (to) from subsidiaries |
|
|
(223,050 |
) |
|
225,916 |
|
|
(2,866 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
(7,513 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(7,513 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
5,162 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,162 |
|
Common share repurchases |
|
|
(2,169 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(2,169 |
) |
Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities |
|
|
115,430 |
|
|
225,916 |
|
|
(2,866 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
338,480 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
96,713 |
|
|
(17,426 |
) |
|
4,024 |
|
|
- |
|
|
83,311 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
50,642 |
|
|
(8,333 |
) |
|
(631 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
41,678 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
147,355 |
|
$ |
(25,759 |
) |
$ |
3,393 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
124,989 |
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. and subsidiaries at September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2003 the Company changed its method of accounting for consolidated inventory not owned to conform to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
November 5, 2004
Quarterly Financial Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized quarterly financial information (unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,211,141 |
|
$ |
1,009,279 |
|
$ |
876,581 |
|
$ |
810,108 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
128,201 |
|
|
96,238 |
|
|
77,844 |
|
|
75,652 |
|
Net income |
|
|
80,087 |
|
|
59,680 |
|
|
48,858 |
|
|
47,186 |
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
6.05 |
|
$ |
4.48 |
|
$ |
3.66 |
|
$ |
3.55 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
5.82 |
|
$ |
4.31 |
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
$ |
3.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2003: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,039,923 |
|
$ |
771,758 |
|
$ |
665,567 |
|
$ |
700,160 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
92,634 |
|
|
65,968 |
|
|
61,487 |
|
|
59,066 |
|
Net income |
|
|
57,164 |
|
|
40,689 |
|
|
37,972 |
|
|
36,920 |
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
$ |
2.96 |
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
4.18 |
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
$ |
2.75 |
|
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
As of September 30, 2004, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of Beazer Homes management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Based on that evaluation, Beazer Homes management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that required information will be disclosed on a timely basis in our reports filed under the Exchange Act. No changes in Beazer Hom
es internal control over financial reporting were identified during the evaluation described above that occurred during the Companys fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Director information is incorporated by reference to the section entitled Election of Directors of our Proxy Statement for our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed on or before December 20, 2004. Information regarding our executive officers is set forth herein under Part I as a separate item.
Beazer Homes has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for its senior financial officers, which applies to its principal financial officer and controller, other senior financial officers and Chief Executive Officer. The full text of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be found on the Companys website. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of the following committees of our Board of Directors: Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance, are also posted to our website, and are available in print to any stockholder who requests a printed copy. Information regarding waivers of our code of business conduct and ethics will also be published on our website.
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled Executive Compensation of our Proxy Statement for our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed on or before December 20, 2004.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled Security Ownership of Management of our Proxy Statement for our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed on or before December 20, 2004.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
None
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled Principal Accounting Firm Fees of our Proxy Statement for our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is expected to be filed on or before December 20, 2004.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a) 1. Financial Statements
|
Page herein |
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002. |
33 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2004 and 2003. |
34 |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002. |
35 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002. |
36 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
37 |
2. Financial Statement Schedules
None required
3. Exhibits
Exhibit Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
Page herein or incorporated by reference from |
2.1 |
--- |
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Beazer Homes USA, Inc., Beazer Homes Investment Corp., and Crossmann Communities Inc. dated as of January 29, 2002 |
(6) |
3.1 |
--- |
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company |
(9) |
3.2 |
--- |
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company |
Filed herewith |
4.1 |
--- |
Indenture dated as of May 21, 2001 among the Company and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, related to the Companys 8 5/8% Senior Notes due 2011 |
(5) |
4.2 |
--- |
Supplemental Indenture (8 5/8% Notes) dated as of May 21, 2001 among the Company, its subsidiaries party thereto and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee |
(5) |
4.3 |
--- |
Form of 8 5/8 % Senior Notes due 2011 |
(5) |
4.4 |
--- |
Specimen of Common Stock Certificate |
(2) |
4.5* |
--- |
Retirement Savings and Investment Plan (the RSIP) |
(1) |
4.6* |
--- |
RSIP Summary Plan Description |
(1) |
4.7 |
--- |
Rights Agreement, dated as of June 21, 1996, between the Company and First Chicago Trust Company of New York, as Rights Agent |
(8) |
4.8 |
--- |
Indenture dated as of April 17, 2002 among Beazer, the Guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, related to the Companys 8 3/8% Senior Notes due 2012 |
(6) |
4.9 |
--- |
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 17, 2002 among Beazer, the Guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, related to the Companys 8 3/8% Senior Notes due 2012 |
(6) |
4.10 |
--- |
Form of 8 3/8 % Senior Notes due 2012 |
(6) |
4.11 |
--- |
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 13, 2003 among Beazer, the Guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee, related to the Companys 6 1/2% Senior Notes due 2013 |
(8) |
4.12 |
--- |
Form of 6 1/2 % Senior Notes due 2013 |
(8) |
4.13 |
--- |
Indenture dated as of June 8, 2004 among Beazer, the Guarantors party thereto and SunTrust Bank, as trustee, related to the 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 |
(10) |
4.14 |
--- |
Form of 4 5/8% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 |
(10) |
10.1* |
--- |
Amended and Restated 1994 Stock Incentive Plan |
(3) |
10.2* |
--- |
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan |
(8) |
10.3* |
--- |
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Incentive Plan |
(7) |
10.4* |
--- |
2005 Value Created Incentive Plan |
Filed herewith |
10.5* |
--- |
Amended and Restated Corporate Management Stock Purchase Program |
Filed herewith |
10.6* |
--- |
Customer Survey Incentive Plan |
Filed herewith |
10.7* |
--- |
Director Stock Purchase Program |
Filed herewith |
10.8* |
--- |
Form of Stock Option and Restricted Stock Award Agreement |
Filed herewith |
10.9* |
--- |
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement |
Filed herewith |
10.9-15 |
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreements dated as of September 1, 2004: |
|
10.10* |
--- |
Ian J. McCarthy |
(11) |
10.11* |
--- |
Michael H. Furlow |
(11) |
10.12* |
--- |
James OLeary |
(11) |
10.13* |
--- |
Lowell Ball |
(11) |
10.14* |
--- |
Michael T. Rand |
(11) |
10.15* |
--- |
John Skelton |
(11) |
10.16-22 |
|
Supplemental Employment Agreements dated as of September 1, 2004: |
|
10.16* |
--- |
Ian J. McCarthy |
(11) |
10.17* |
--- |
Michael H. Furlow |
(11) |
10.18* |
--- |
James OLeary |
(11) |
10.19* |
--- |
Lowell Ball |
(11) |
10.20* |
--- |
Michael T. Rand |
(11) |
10.21* |
--- |
John Skelton |
(11) |
10.22* |
--- |
Jonathan P. Smoke |
(11) |
10.23* |
--- |
Employment Agreement dated as of September 1, 2004 for Cory J. Boydston |
Filed herewith |
10.24 |
--- |
Purchase Agreement for Sanford Homes of Colorado LLLP |
(4) |
10.25 |
--- |
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 28, 2004 between the Company and Bank One, NA, as Agent, Guaranty Bank, BNP Paribas and Wachovia Bank, National Association as Syndication Agents, The Royal Bank of Scotland plc as Documentation Agent, SunTrust Bank, PNC Bank, National Association and Washington Mutual Bank, FA, as Managing Agents, Comerica Bank and Key Bank National Association as Co-Agents, and Banc One Capital Markets, Inc., Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner. |
(12) |
21 |
--- |
Subsidiaries of the Company |
Filed herewith |
23 |
--- |
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Filed herewith |
31.1 |
--- |
Certification pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14 promulgated under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Filed herewith |
31.2 |
--- |
Certification pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14 promulgated under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Filed herewith |
32.1 |
--- |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Filed herewith |
32.2 |
--- |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
Filed herewith |
|
* Represents a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement |
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-91904) filed on May 4, 1995. |
(2) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-72576) initially filed on December 6, 1993. |
(3) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2000. |
(4) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys report on Form 8-K filed on August 10, 2001. |
(5) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2001. |
(6) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-92470) filed on July 16, 2002. |
(7) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8/S-3 (Registration No. 333-101142) filed on November 12, 2002. |
(8) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003. |
(9) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-4/A filed on March 12, 2002. |
(10) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004. |
(11) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys report on Form 8-K filed on September 1, 2004. |
(12) |
Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Companys report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2004. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On July 8, 2004 we furnished a report on Form 8-K announcing under Item 12 our new home orders for the three month period ended June 30, 2004.
On July 29, 2004 we furnished a report on Form 8-K announcing under Item 12 our earnings and results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2004.
On September 1, 2004 we filed a report on Form 8-K announcing under Item 1.01 our entry into supplemental employment agreements with the following executives: Ian J. McCarthy, President and Chief Executive Officer; Michael H. Furlow, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; James O'Leary, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Lowell Ball, Senior Vice President, General Counsel; Michael T. Rand, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer; John Skelton, Senior Vice President, Forward Planning; and Jonathan P. Smoke, Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer.
(c) Exhibits
Reference is made to Item 15(a)3 above. The following is a list of exhibits, included in item 15(a)3 above, that are filed concurrently with this report.
|
3.2 |
--- |
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company |
|
10.4* |
--- |
2005 Value Created Incentive Plan |
|
10.5* |
--- |
Amended and Restated Corporate Management Stock Purchase Program |
|
10.6* |
--- |
Customer Survey Incentive Plan |
|
10.7* |
--- |
Director Stock Purchase Program |
|
10.8* |
--- |
Form of Stock Option and Restricted Stock Award Agreement |
|
10.9* |
--- |
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement |
|
10.23* |
--- |
Employment Agreement dated as of September 1, 2004 for Cory J. Boydston |
|
21 |
--- |
Subsidiaries of the Company |
|
23 |
--- |
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
31.1 |
--- |
Certification pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14 promulgated under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 |
--- |
Certification pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14 promulgated under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.1 |
--- |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2 |
--- |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(d) Financial Statement Schedules
Reference is made to Item 15(a)2 above.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
|
By: /s/ IAN J. MCCARTHY |
|
Name: Ian J. McCarthy |
|
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
Date: December 6, 2004 |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
December 6, 2004 |
By: /s/ BRIAN C. BEAZER |
Date |
Brian C. Beazer, Director and Non-Executive Chairman of the Board |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Ian J. McCarthy, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Laurent Alpert, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Katie J. Bayne, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ MAUREEN E. OCONNELL |
Date |
Maureen E. OConnell, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Larry T. Solari, Director |
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ STEPHEN P. ZELNAK |
Date |
Stephen P. Zelnak, Jr., Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
James OLeary, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Michael T. Rand, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer |
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |