One Rudolph Road,

Flanders, New Jersey  07836

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

 

(973) 691-1300

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

 

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X]   No [_]

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes [X] No [_]

        The number of outstanding shares of the Registrant's Common Stock on July 27, 2004 was 16,754,660.

 

PART I    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PART II    OTHER INFORMATION

PART I   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.   Financial Statements

 

RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

		June 30, 2004		December 31, 2003
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$    36,665		$  41,220
Short-term investments		39,442		39,342
Accounts receivable, net		17,730		10,244
Inventories		32,563		28,321
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,332		3,958
Total current assets		129,732		123,085
Net property, plant and equipment		6,834		6,817
Goodwill		13,245		13,245
Identifiable intangible assets, net		9,941		10,379
Other assets		6,717		6,845
Total assets		$ 166,469		$ 160,371
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$     7,587		$     5,967
Other current liabilities		7,052		5,867
Total current liabilities		14,639		11,834
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock		17		17
Additional paid-in capital		142,225		141,154
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,344)		(1,096)
Retained earnings		10,932		8,462
Total stockholders' equity		151,830		148,537
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity		$  166,469		$ 160,371

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

---

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2004		2003		2004		2003
Revenues		$   20,433		$    13,931		$   39,325		$   28,436
Cost of revenues		10,533		8,003		20,821		16,392
Gross profit		9,900		5,928		18,504		12,044
Operating expenses:
Research and development		4,145		3,211		8,316		6,649
Selling, general and administrative		3,678		2,531		6,971		5,404
Amortization		219		219		438		438
Total operating expenses		8,042		5,961		15,725		12,491
Operating income (loss)		1,858		(33)		2,779		(447)
Interest income and other, net		251		405		600		1,047
Income before income taxes		2,109		372		3,379		600
Provision for income taxes		617		86		909		139
Net income		$    1,492		$       286		$     2,470		$       461
Earnings per share:
Basic		$      0.09		$      0.02		$      0.15		$     0.03
Diluted		$      0.09		$      0.02		$      0.15		$     0.03
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		16,740,759		16,356,886		16,717,084		16,344,049
Diluted		16,892,059		16,555,981		16,968,741		16,550,513

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

	Six Months Ended June 30
	2004		2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$  2,470		$   461
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by            operating activities:
Amortization	438		438
Depreciation	615		687
Net (loss) gain on sale of marketable securities	(106)		518
Tax benefit from sale of shares through employee stock plans	183		5
Provision for doubtful accounts	74		42
Deferred income taxes	-		119
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Accounts receivable	(7,568)		2,060
Income taxes receivable	104		678
Inventories	(4,249)		3,209
Prepaid expenses and other assets	786		231
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable	(10)		(1,790)
Accrued liabilities	1,626		(507)
Income Taxes Payable	400		(245)
Deferred revenue	(474)		(424)
Other current liabilities	1,251		(691)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(4,460)		4,791
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net increase in marketable securities	(341)		(7,252)
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(630)		(216)
Net cash used in investing activities	(971)		(7,468)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sales of shares through employee stock plans	888		497
Net cash provided by financing activities	888		497
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(12)		37
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(4,555)		(2,143)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	41,220		42,047
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$   36,665		$   39,904

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

 

RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

 

NOTE 1.    Basis of Presentation

        The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") and in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary for their fair presentation in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  Actual amounts could differ materially from those amounts.  The interim results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.  This interim financial information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

NOTE 2.   Stock-Based Compensation

        At June 30, 2004, the Company has stock-based employee compensation plans.  The Company accounts for its stock option plans in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations.  As such, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price.   No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.  The Company has adopted the disclosure standards of  Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," which requires the Company to provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for employee stock option grants as if the fair-value-based method of accounting for stock options, as defined in SFAS No. 123, had been applied.  The following table illustrates the effect on net income and per share amounts if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation:

    The fair value of each stock option granted during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:                                 

NOTE 3.   Marketable Securities

        The Company has evaluated its investment policies consistent with SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities," and determined that all of its investment securities are to be classified as available-for-sale.  Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses reported in Stockholders' Equity under the caption "Accumulated other comprehensive loss."  Realized gains and losses, interest and dividends on available-for-sale securities are included in interest income and other, net.  Net realized losses on available-for-sale securities were $121 and $106 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively.  Net realized gains on available-for-sale securities were $174 and $518 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively. Gross unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities were $110 and $192 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.  Gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities were $369 and $47 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

NOTE 4.    Identifiable Intangible Assets and Goodwill

 Identifiable intangible assets:

        Identifiable intangible assets as of June 30, 2004 are as follows:

	Weighted Average Useful Life		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net
Purchased technology	12 years		$       3,091		$    1,967		$    1,124
Patented technology	16 years		9,900		1,083		8,817
Total			$     12,991		$    3,050		$    9,941

        Identifiable intangible assets as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:

      Intangible asset amortization expense for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was $219 and $438, respectively.  Assuming no change in the gross carrying value of identifiable intangible assets, estimated amortization expense amounts to $876 for 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008.

NOTE 5.   Accounts Receivable

        Accounts receivable are net of the allowance for doubtful accounts of $320 and $249 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

NOTE 6.    Inventories

      

NOTE 7.   Property, Plant and Equipment

		June 30,		December 31,
		2004		2003
Land and building		$      5,156		$     5,152
Machinery and equipment		2,031		1,885
Furniture and fixtures		1,422		1,401
Computer equipment		3,275		2,812
Leasehold improvements		886		884
		12,770		12,134
Accumulated depreciation		(5,936)		(5,317)
Net property, plant and equipment		$      6,834		$     6,817

NOTE 8.   Commitments and Contingencies

            Intellectual property indemnification obligations

        The Company has entered into agreements with customers that include limited intellectual property indemnification obligations that are customary in the industry.  These guarantees generally require the Company to compensate the other party for certain damages and costs incurred as a result of third party intellectual property claims arising from these transactions.  The nature of the intellectual property indemnification obligations prevents the Company from making a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount it could be required to pay to its customers.  Historically, the Company has not made any indemnification payments under such agreements and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these indemnification guarantees.

           Warranty Reserves

        The Company generally provides a warranty on its products for a period of twelve to fifteen months against defects in material and workmanship.  The Company estimates the costs that may be incurred during the warranty period and records a liability in the amount of such costs at the time revenue is recognized.  The Company's estimate is based primarily on historical experience.  The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary.

Changes in the Company's warranty reserves are as follows:

            Legal Matters

        On September 30, 2003, the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, ISOA, Inc. ("ISOA") filed a counterclaim in the Dallas, Texas District Courts in response to a claim filed on September 23, 2003 against Rudolph and ISOA by August Technology Corporation ("August") and STI, Inc. ("STI") related to a commercial dispute.  The dispute arose from a December 24, 1997 Development Agreement between ISOA and STI.  August acquired STI from ASTI Holdings, Ltd. in April 2003.

          Under the Development Agreement, ISOA agreed to provide to STI certain engineering resources in the development of software for STI's semiconductor metrology systems.  In return, STI agreed to pay to ISOA a minimum royalty of $1.0 million of which approximately one-third was paid.  August alleged that ISOA did not fulfill its obligations under the Development Agreement and sought a judgment against ISOA for repayment of the monies previously paid and attorney's fees incurred in bringing this action.  The Company had maintained that ISOA fulfilled its obligations under the Development Agreement and that August remained obligated to pay all amounts as agreed to under the Development Agreement.  August further alleged that ISOA did not perform substantially in order to justify any additional payments.  The Company further believed that intellectual property delivered by ISOA under the terms of the Development Agreement may have been and continued to be used in current systems on the market from August.   ISOA's counterclaim sought full payment of the minimum royalty, ongoing royalty payments for any August macro defection inspection tools using ISOA's property, damages, costs, and attorneys' fees.

          On August 6, 2004 the Company entered into a settlement agreement with August.  Under the terms of the settlement, both companies have agreed to dismiss all claims against each other related to this matter.  The Company will receive a one-time payment of $502,500 from ASTI Holdings in connection with the settlement, which will be reflected in the Company's consolidated financial statements for the three months ending September 30, 2004.

        In addition, from time to time the Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business.   The Company is not aware of any legal proceedings or claims that management believes would have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated operating results or financial condition.

NOTE 9.   Comprehensive Income (Loss)

        The disclosures required by SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income," have been included below.  The difference between net income and comprehensive income (loss) for the Company is due to currency translation adjustments and unrealized gain (loss) on investments.

        The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:

  

		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2004		2003		2004		2003
Net income		$       1,492		$      286		$    2,470		$        461
Change in net unrealized gains on    investments		(413)		43		(347)		(255)
Change in currency translation    adjustments		7		(50)		99		(254)
Total		$       1,086		$      279		$    2,222		$       (48)

 

NOTE 10.   Earnings Per Share

        Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per share is computed in the same manner and also gives effect to all dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.  Potentially dilutive common equivalent shares consist of stock options for the 2004 and 2003 periods.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, there were stock options with exercise prices above the average fair market value of the Company's common stock which were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to the anti-dilutive nature of these options.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004,  the weighted average number of stock options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share were 1,416,182 and 1,350,502, respectively.   For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, the weighted average number of stock options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share were 2,178,868 and 1,945,630, respectively.

        The Company's basic and diluted earnings per share amounts are as follows:

NOTE 11.   Geographic Reporting and Customer Concentration

        For geographical reporting, revenues are attributed to the geographic location in which the customer is located.  Revenue by geographic region is as follows: 

        Customers comprising 10% or more of revenue:

			Six Months Ended
			June 30,
			2004		2003
	Customer A		17.5%		6.0%
	Customer B		13.5%		53.9%
	Customer C		10.0%		4.8%

NOTE 12.   Recent Accounting Pronouncements        

        In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure."  SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation as originally provided by SFAS No. 123.  Additionally, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure in both the annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results.  The transitional requirements of SFAS No. 148 are effective for all financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002.  The company adopted the disclosure portion of this statement beginning in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003.  The application of the disclosure portion of this standard had no impact on the company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.  On April 22, 2003, the FASB determined that stock-based compensation should be recognized as a cost in the financial statements and that such cost be measured according to the fair value of stock options.  The FASB issued an exposure draft, "Share-Based Payment, an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95," on March 31, 2004.  The eventual adoption of this proposed statement, if issued in final form by the FASB, will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated operating results and financial position.

NOTE 13.   Reclassifications        

        Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current financial statement presentation.

---

 

Item 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  

Critical Accounting Policies

       Management's discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We review the accounting policies we use in reporting our financial results on a regular basis.  The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, inventories, intangible assets, income taxes and warranty obligations.  We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  Results may differ from these estimates due to actual outcomes being different from those on which we based our assumptions.  These estimates and judgments are reviewed by management on an ongoing basis, and by the Audit Committee at the end of each quarter prior to the public release of our financial results.  We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

       Revenue Recognition.    Revenue is recognized upon shipment provided that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured.  Certain sales of our products are sold and accounted for as multiple element arrangements, consisting primarily of the sale of the product, installation and training services.  We generally recognize product revenue upon delivery.  When customer acceptance is subjective and not obtained prior to shipment, we defer product revenue until such time as positive affirmation of acceptance has been obtained from the customer.  Customer acceptance is generally based on our products meeting published performance specifications.   The amount of revenue allocated to the shipment of products is done on a residual method basis.  Under this method, the total arrangement value is allocated first to undelivered contract elements, based on their fair values, with the remainder being allocated to product revenue.  The fair value of installation and training services is based upon billable hourly rates and the estimated time to complete the service.  Revenue related to undelivered installation services is deferred until such time as installation is completed at the customer's site.   Revenue related to training services is recognized ratably over the training period.

        Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.    We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments.  We specifically analyze accounts receivable and analyze historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.  If the financial condition of our customers was to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments or our assumptions are otherwise incorrect, additional allowances may be required.

        Excess and Obsolete Inventory.    We write down our excess and obsolete inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future product life-cycles, product demand and market conditions.  If actual product life-cycles, product demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

        Long-Lived Assets and Acquired Intangible Assets.    The Company periodically reviews long-lived assets, other than goodwill, for impairment whenever changes in events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Goodwill, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, is reviewed for possible impairment at least annually during the fourth quarter for each year.  A review of goodwill may be initiated prior to conducting the annual analysis if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may be impaired.   Assumptions and estimates used in the determination of impairment losses, such as future cash flows and disposition costs, may affect the carrying value of long-lived assets and the impairment of such long-lived assets, if any, could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

        Warranties.     We provide for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized.  While we engage in product quality programs and processes, our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure.  Should actual product failure rates, material usage or service delivery costs differ from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

        Accounting for Income Taxes.    As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our actual current tax exposure together with our temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes.  These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet.  We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance.  Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and any valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets.  At June 30, 2004 we had no valuation allowance established against our deferred tax assets.  The need for a valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income by jurisdiction in which we operate and the period over which our deferred taxes will be recoverable.  In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to establish a valuation allowance, which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

        In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure."  SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation as originally provided by SFAS No. 123.  Additionally, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure in both the annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results.  The transitional requirements of SFAS No. 148 are effective for all financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002.  The company adopted the disclosure portion of this statement beginning in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003.  The application of the disclosure portion of this standard had no impact on the company's consolidated financial position or results of operations.  On April 22, 2003, the FASB determined that stock-based compensation should be recognized as a cost in the financial statements and that such cost be measured according to the fair value of stock options.  The FASB issued an exposure draft, "Share-Based Payment, an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95," on March 31, 2004.  The eventual adoption of this proposed statement, if issued in final form by the FASB, will have a material effect on our consolidated operating results and financial position.

Results of Operations for the Three and Six Month Periods Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003

        We are a worldwide leader in the design, development, manufacture and support of process control metrology systems used in semiconductor device manufacturing.  Our thin film measurement proprietary systems measure the thickness and other properties of thin films applied during various steps in the manufacture of integrated circuits, enabling semiconductor device manufacturers to improve yields and reduce overall production costs.   Our macro-defect inspection proprietary systems detect and classify defects in semiconductor wafers.   We provide our customers with a flexible full-fab metrology solution by offering families of systems that meet their transparent and opaque thin film measurement and macro-defect inspection needs in various applications across the fabrication process.   Our three primary families of metrology solutions offer leading-edge metrology technology, flexible systems cost-effectively designed for specific manufacturing applications and a common production-worthy automation platform, all backed by worldwide support.

        Our business is affected by the annual spending patterns of our customers on semiconductor capital equipment.  The amount that our customers devote to capital equipment spending depends on a number of factors including, general worldwide economic conditions as well as other economic drivers such as personal computer and cell phone sales.  After several years of reduced capital spending by semiconductor device manufacturers, current forecasts by industry analysts for the semiconductor device manufacturing industry project a year over year increase in capital spending of 40 - 50% for 2004.  The Company monitors capital equipment spending through announced capital spending plans by our customers and monthly-published industry data such as the book to bill ratio.  The book to bill ratio is a 3-month running statistic that compares bookings or orders placed with capital equipment suppliers to billings or shipments.  A book to bill above one shows that equipment manufacturers are ordering equipment at a pace that exceeds the equipment suppliers' shipments for the period.

          Historically, a significant portion of our revenues in each quarter and year has been derived from sales to relatively few end user customers, and we expect this trend to continue.   In the six month period ended June 30, 2004 and the years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001 sales to end-user customers that individually represented at least five percent of our revenues accounted for 53.3%, 59.4%, 46.8% and 42.5% of our revenues, respectively.  In the six month period ended June 30, 2004 and the years ended 2003, 2002 and 2001 sales to Intel accounted for 13.5%, 35.3%, 46.8% and 33.4% of our revenues, respectively.

          We do not have purchase contracts with any of our customers or our distributor that obligates them to continue to purchase our products, and they could cease purchasing products from us at any time.  A delay in purchase or cancellation by any of our large customers could cause quarterly revenues to vary significantly.  In addition, during a given quarter, a significant portion of our revenues may be derived from the sale of a relatively small number of systems.  Our transparent film measurement systems range in average selling price from approximately $30,000 to $1.0 million per system, our opaque film measurement systems range in average selling price from approximately $900,000 to $1.8 million per system and our macro-defect inspection systems range in average selling price from approximately $250,000 to $1.4 million per system.  Accordingly, a small change in the number of systems we sell may also cause significant changes in our operating results.  Because fluctuations in the timing of orders from our major customers or distributors or in the number of our individual systems we sell could cause our revenues to fluctuate significantly in any given quarter or year, we do not believe that period-to-period comparisons of our financial results are necessarily meaningful, and they should not be relied upon as an indication of our future performance.

        A significant portion of our revenues has been derived from customers outside of the United States, and we expect this trend to continue.  In the six month period ending June 30, 2004, approximately 70.9% of our revenues were derived from customers outside of the United States, of which 58.3% were derived from customers in Asia and 12.6% were derived from customers in Europe.  In 2003, approximately 65.4% of our revenues were derived from customers outside of the United States, of which 39.9% were derived from customers in Asia and 25.5% were derived from customers in Europe.  In 2002, approximately 40.6% of our revenues were derived from customers outside of the United States, of which 30.1% were derived from customers in Asia and 10.4% were derived from customers in Europe.  In 2001, approximately 53.7% of our revenues were derived from customers outside of the United States, of which 36.6% were derived from customers in Asia and 14.5% were derived from customers in Europe.  Substantially all of our revenues to date have been denominated in United States dollars.  We expect that revenues generated from customers outside of the United States will continue to account for a significant percentage of our revenues.

          The sales cycle for our systems typically ranges from six to 15 months, and can be longer when our customers are evaluating new technology.  Due to the length of these cycles, we invest significantly in research and development and sales and marketing in advance of generating revenues related to these investments.  Additionally, the rate and timing of customer orders may vary significantly from month to month.  Accordingly, if sales of our products do not occur when we expect, and we are unable to adjust our estimates on a timely basis, our expenses and inventory levels may increase relative to revenues and total assets. 

        Revenues. Our revenues are derived from the sale of our systems, services, spare parts and licensing. Our revenues were $20.4 million and $39.3 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, compared to $13.9 million and $28.4 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003, representing an increase of 46.7% and $38.3% for the respective periods.

        Although there has been recent sequential improvements in the business environment, there is uncertainty as to the strength and length of the next cyclical growth phase in our industry.  Until such time as we return to a period of sustainable growth and due to continued low visibility in our projected sales, we maintain a cautious outlook for future orders and sales levels.

        The following table lists the different sources of our revenue:

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,
	Revenue Type	2004		2003		2004		2003
	Systems	77%		80%		80%		77%
	Parts	12%		6%		10%		7%
	Services	9%		9%		9%		9%
	Licensing	2%		5%		1%		7%
	Total	100%		100%		100%		100%

        Systems revenue has increased as a percentage of revenue for the six month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2003 as a result of the recent improvement in the semiconductor device manufacturing sector this past year.  Systems revenue has decreased as a percentage of revenue for the three month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2003 as a result of increased parts sales.  Parts and service revenue is slightly higher as a percentage of revenue over the same period as customers continue to spend more on repair and maintenance of their existing equipment.  When the industry sustains a prolonged recovery, we expect systems revenues as a percentage of revenue to increase and parts and service revenues as a percentage of revenue to decrease as customers buy new equipment.  Licensing revenue is derived from contracts obtained as a result of the acquisition of our Yield Metrology Group in September 2002.  Licensing our technologies is not part of our core business strategy.  Therefore, we expect licensing revenue to continue to be a small portion of our revenue.

        Gross Profit . Our gross profit has been and will continue to be affected by a variety of factors, including manufacturing efficiencies, excess and obsolete inventory write-offs, pricing by competitors or suppliers, new product introductions, product sales mix, production volume, customization and reconfiguration of systems, international and domestic sales mix, and field service margins. Our gross profit was $9.9 million and $18.5 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, compared to $5.9 million and $12.0 million for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2003. Our gross profit represented 48.5% and 47.1% of our revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 42.6% and 42.4% of our revenues for the same periods in the prior year. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of revenue for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 compared to the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 is primarily due to an increase in metal tool shipments, which typically have higher margins, and leverage generated by fixed manufacturing and customer service costs representing a smaller percentage of the overall cost of good sold.  These increases were partially offset by a decrease in licensing revenues.

        Research and Development . The thin film transparent, opaque process control and macro-defect inspection metrology market is characterized by continuous technological development and product innovations. We believe that the rapid and ongoing development of new products and enhancements to existing products, including the transition to copper and low-k dielectrics, the progression to 300 mm wafers, the continuous shrinkage in critical dimensions, and the evolution of ultra-thin gate process control, is critical to our success. Accordingly, we devote a significant portion of our technical, management and financial resources to research and development programs. Research and development expenditures consist primarily of salaries and related expenses of employees engaged in research, design and development activities. They also include consulting fees and the cost of related supplies. Our research and development expense was $4.1 million and $8.3 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30 2004, compared to $3.2 million and $6.6 million for the same period in the prior year.  Research and development expense represented 20.3% and 21.1% of our revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, compared to 23.0% and 23.4% of revenues for the same periods in the prior year.   The year over year dollar increase in research and development expenses primarily reflects higher compensation costs and an increase in product development costs. We anticipate research and development expense will be a similar percentage of revenue for the near term and increase in absolute dollars due to increased salary expense and additional project costs.

Cyclicality in the semiconductor device industry has led to substantial decreases in demand for our systems and may from time to time continue to do so

        Our operating results are subject to significant variation due to the cyclical nature of the semiconductor device industry.  The semiconductor device industry recently experienced a prolonged downturn, which has seriously harmed our recent operating results.  Our business depends upon the capital expenditures of semiconductor device manufacturers, which, in turn, depend upon the current and anticipated market demand for semiconductors and products using semiconductors.  There is typically a nine to twelve month lag between a change in the economic condition of the semiconductor device industry and the resulting change in the level of capital expenditures by semiconductor device manufacturers. In most cases, the resulting decrease in capital expenditures has been more pronounced than the precipitating downturn in semiconductor device industry revenues.  Any future downturn in the semiconductor device industry, or any reduction by that industry in capital expenditures, may seriously harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We obtain some of the components and subassemblies included in our systems from a limited group of suppliers, and the partial or complete loss of one of these suppliers could cause production delays and a substantial loss of revenues

        We obtain some of the components and subassemblies included in our systems from a limited group of suppliers and do not have long-term contracts with many of our suppliers.  Our dependence on limited source suppliers of components and our lack of long-term contracts with many of our suppliers exposes us to several risks, including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of components, price increases, late deliveries and poor component quality.   Disruption or termination of the supply of these components could delay shipments of our systems, damage our customer relationships and reduce our sales.   From time to time in the past, we have experienced temporary difficulties in receiving shipments from our suppliers.  The lead time required for shipments of some of our components can be as long as four months.  In addition, the lead time required to qualify new suppliers for lasers could be as long as a year, and the lead time required to qualify new suppliers of other components could be as long as nine months.  If we are unable to accurately predict our component needs, or if our component supply is disrupted, we may miss market opportunities by not being able to meet the demand for our systems.   Further, a significant increase in the price of one or more of these components or subassemblies included in our systems could seriously harm our results of operations.

Our largest customers account for a significant portion of our revenues, and our revenues would significantly decline if one or more of these customers were to purchase significantly fewer of our systems or they delayed or cancelled a large order

        In 2001, 2002, 2003 and for first six months ended June 30, 2004, sales to end user customers that individually represented at least five percent of our revenues accounted for 42.5%, 46.8%, 59.4%, and 53.3% of our revenues.  In 2001, 2002, 2003 and for the six months ended June 30, 2004, sales to Intel, a key customer, accounted for 33.4%, 46.8%, 35.3% and 13.5% of our revenues.  For the six months ended June 30, 2004, sales to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company accounted for 17.5% of our revenues.  We operate in the highly concentrated, capital intensive semiconductor device manufacturing industry.   Historically, a significant portion of our revenues in each quarter and year has been derived from sales to relatively few customers, and we expect this trend to continue.   If any of our key customers were to purchase significantly fewer of our systems in the future, or if a large order were delayed or cancelled, our revenues would significantly decline.  We expect that we will continue to depend on a small number of large customers for a significant portion of our revenues for at least the next several years.  In addition, as large semiconductor device manufacturers seek to establish closer relationships with their suppliers, we expect that our customer base will become even more concentrated.

Our operating results have in the past varied and probably will in the future continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter, causing volatility in our stock price

         Our quarterly operating results have varied significantly in the past and may continue to do so in the future, which could cause our stock price to decline. Some of the factors that may influence our operating results and subject our stock to extreme price and volume fluctuations include:

• changes in customer demand for our systems, which is influenced by economic conditions in the semiconductor device industry, demand for products that use semiconductors, market acceptance of our systems and those of our customers and changes in our product offerings;

• seasonal variations in customer demand, including the tendency of European sales to slow significantly in the third quarter of each year;

• the timing, cancellation or delay of customer orders and shipments;

• product development costs, including increased research, development, engineering and marketing expenses associated with our introduction of new products and product enhancements; and

• the levels of our fixed expenses, including research and development costs associated with product development, relative to our revenue levels.

        In light of these factors and the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry, we expect to continue to experience significant fluctuations in quarterly and annual operating results.  Moreover, many of our expenses are fixed in the short-term which, together with the need for continued investment in research and development, marketing and customer support, limits our ability to reduce expenses quickly.   As a result, declines in net sales could harm our business and the price of our common stock could substantially decline.

Our revenue may vary significantly each quarter due to relatively small fluctuations in our unit sales

         During any quarter, a significant portion of our revenue may be derived from the sale of a relatively small number of systems.   Our transparent film measurement systems range in average selling price from approximately $30,000 to $1.0 million per system, our opaque film measurement systems range in average selling price from approximately $900,000 to $1.8 million per system and our macro-defect detection systems range in average selling price from approximately $250,000 to $1.4 million per system.   Accordingly, a small change in the number of systems we sell may also cause significant changes in our operating results.   This, in turn, could cause fluctuations in the market price of our common stock.

Variations in the amount of time it takes for us to sell our systems may cause fluctuations in our operating results, which could cause our stock price to decline

        Variations in the length of our sales cycles could cause our revenues, and thus our business, financial condition and operating results, to fluctuate widely from period to period.  This variation could cause our stock price to decline.  Our customers generally take a long time to evaluate our film metrology systems and many people are involved in the evaluation process.  We expend significant resources educating and providing information to our prospective customers regarding the uses and benefits of our systems in the semiconductor fabrication process.  The length of time it takes for us to make a sale depends upon many factors, including:

• the efforts of our sales force and/or our independent distributor;

• the complexity of the customer's fabrication processes;

• the internal technical capabilities and sophistication of the customer;

• the customer's budgetary constraints; and

• the quality and sophistication of the customer's current metrology equipment.

        Because of the number of factors influencing the sales process, the period between our initial contact with a customer and the time when we recognize revenue from that customer, if ever, varies widely in length.  Our sales cycles, including the time it takes for us to build a product to customer specifications after receiving an order, typically range from six to 15 months. Sometimes our sales cycles can be much longer, particularly with customers in Japan.  During these cycles, we commit substantial resources to our sales efforts in advance of receiving any revenue, and we may never receive any revenue from a customer despite our sales efforts.

        If we do make a sale, our customers often purchase only one of our systems, and then evaluate its performance for a lengthy period before purchasing any more of our systems.  The number of additional products a customer purchases, if any, depends on many factors, including a customer's capacity requirements.  The period between a customer's initial purchase and any subsequent purchases can vary from six months to a year or longer, and variations in the length of this period could cause further fluctuations in our operating results and possibly in our stock price.

If we are not successful in developing new and enhanced products for the semiconductor device manufacturing industry we will lose market share to our competitors

        We operate in an industry that is subject to evolving industry standards, rapid technological changes, rapid changes in consumer demands and the rapid introduction of new, higher performance systems with shorter product life cycles.  To be competitive in our demanding market, we must continually design, develop and introduce in a timely manner new film metrology systems that meet the performance and price demands of semiconductor device manufacturers.   We must also continue to refine our current systems so that they remain competitive.  We may experience difficulties or delays in our development efforts with respect to new systems, and we may not ultimately be successful in developing them.   Any significant delay in releasing new systems could adversely affect our reputation, give a competitor a first-to-market advantage or cause a competitor to achieve greater market share.

Even if we are able to successfully develop new products, if these products do not gain general market acceptance we will not be able to generate revenues and recover our research and development costs

        Metrology and inspection product development is inherently risky because it is difficult to foresee developments in semiconductor device manufacturing technology, coordinate technical personnel, and identify and eliminate system design flaws.  Any new systems we introduce may not achieve a significant degree of market acceptance or, once accepted, may fail to sell well for a sustained period.

        We expect to spend a significant amount of time and resources developing new systems and refining our existing systems.  In light of the long product development cycles inherent in our industry, these expenditures will be made well in advance of the prospect of deriving revenue from the sale of those systems.  Our ability to commercially introduce and successfully market new systems is subject to a wide variety of challenges during the development cycle, including start-up bugs, design defects, and other matters that could delay introduction of these systems.  In addition, since our customers are not obligated by long-term contracts to purchase our systems, our anticipated product orders may not materialize, or orders that do materialize may be cancelled.  As a result, if we do not achieve market acceptance of new products, we may not be able to realize sufficient sales to recoup research and development expenditures.

Even if we are able to develop new products that gain market acceptance, sales of new products could impair our ability to sell existing products

        Competition from our new ultra-II<TM> systems could have a negative effect on sales of our other transparent thin film metrology systems and the prices we could charge for these systems.  We may also divert sales and marketing resources from our current systems in order to successfully launch and promote our ultra-II, WaferView<R> or next generation systems.  This diversion of resources could have a further negative effect on sales of our current systems.  Competition from our new MetaPULSE-II<TM> system may also have a negative impact on sales of MetaPULSE<R> systems.  Additionally, the new line of i-MOD<TM> products will incorporate some of our advanced metrologies into small footprint modules that are designed to be integrated into process tool equipment and may, therefore, have a negative effect on the sales of our stand-alone systems that use the same technology.

If our relationships with our large customers deteriorate, our product development activities could be jeopardized

        The success of our product development efforts depends on our ability to anticipate market trends and the price, performance and functionality requirements of semiconductor device manufacturers.  In order to anticipate these trends and ensure that critical development projects proceed in a coordinated manner, we must continue to collaborate closely with our largest customers.  Our relationships with these and other customers provide us with access to valuable information regarding trends in the semiconductor device industry, which enables us to better plan our product development activities. If our current relationships with our large customers are impaired, or if we are unable to develop similar collaborative relationships with important customers in the future, our long-term ability to produce commercially successful systems will be impaired.

Our ability to reduce costs is limited by our ongoing need to invest in research and development

        Our industry is characterized by the need for continual investment in research and development as well as customer service and support.  As a result of our need to maintain our spending levels in these areas, our operating results could be materially harmed if our revenues fall below expectations.  In addition, because of our emphasis on research and development and technological innovation, our operating costs may increase further in the future.

We may fail to adequately protect our intellectual property and, therefore, lose our competitive advantage

         Our future success and competitive position depend in part upon our ability to obtain and maintain proprietary technology for our principal product families, and we rely, in part, on patent, trade secret and trademark law to protect that technology.  If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property, it will be easier for our competitors to sell competing products.   We own or have licensed a number of patents relating to our transparent and opaque thin film metrology and macro-defect inspection systems, and have filed applications for additional patents.  Any of our pending patent applications may be rejected, and we may not in the future be able to develop additional proprietary technology that is patentable.  In addition, the patents we do own or that have been issued or licensed to us may not provide us with competitive advantages and may be challenged by third parties.  Third parties may also design around these patents.

        In addition to patent protection, we rely upon trade secret protection for our confidential and proprietary information and technology.   We routinely enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and other third parties.  However, in the event that these agreements may be breached, we may not have adequate remedies.  Our confidential and proprietary information and technology might also be independently developed by or become otherwise known to third parties.

Successful infringement claims by third parties could result in substantial damages, lost product sales and the loss of important intellectual property rights by us

        Our commercial success depends in part on our ability to avoid infringing or misappropriating patents or other proprietary rights owned by third parties.  From time to time we may receive communications from third parties asserting that our products or systems infringe, or may infringe, the proprietary rights of these third parties.  These claims of infringement may lead to protracted and costly litigation which could require us to pay substantial damages or have the sale of our products or systems stopped by an injunction.   Infringement claims could also cause product or system delays or require us to redesign our products or systems, and these delays could result in the loss of substantial revenues.  We may also be required to obtain a license from the third party or cease activities utilizing the third party's proprietary rights.  We may not be able to enter into such a license or such license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms.  The loss of important intellectual property rights could therefore prevent our ability to sell our systems, or make the sale of such systems more expensive for us.

Protection of our intellectual property rights, or the efforts of third parties to enforce their own intellectual property rights against us, has in the past resulted and may in the future result in costly and time-consuming litigation

        We may be required to initiate litigation in order to enforce any patents issued to or licensed by us, or to determine the scope or validity of a third party's patent or other proprietary rights.   In addition, we may be subject to lawsuits by third parties seeking to enforce their own intellectual property rights.  Any such litigation, regardless of outcome, could be expensive and time consuming, and could subject us to significant liabilities or require us to re-engineer our product or obtain expensive licenses from third parties.

Our efforts to protect our intellectual property may be less effective in some foreign countries where intellectual property rights are not as well protected as in the United States

         In  2001, 2002, 2003 and for the six months ended June 30, 2004, 53.7%, 40.6%, 65.4% and 70.9% of our revenue was derived from sales in foreign countries, including certain countries in Asia such as Taiwan, China, Korea, Singapore and Japan and certain Western European countries.  The laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States, and many U.S. companies have encountered substantial problems in protecting their proprietary rights against infringement in such countries, some of which are countries in which we have sold and continue to sell systems.  For example, Taiwan is not a signatory of the Patent Cooperation Treaty, which is designed to specify rules and methods for defending intellectual property internationally.  The publication of a patent in Taiwan prior to the filing of a patent in Taiwan would invalidate the ability of a company to obtain a patent in Taiwan. Similarly, in contrast to the United States where the contents of patents remain confidential during the patent prosecution process, the contents of a patent are published upon filing which provides competitors an advance view of the contents of a patent application prior to the establishment of patent rights.  There is a risk that our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate in these countries.  For example, our competitors in these countries may independently develop similar technology or duplicate our systems.  If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property in these countries, it would be easier for our competitors to sell competing products in those countries.

Our current and potential competitors have significantly greater resources than we do, and increased competition could impair sales of our products or cause us to reduce our prices

        The market for semiconductor capital equipment is highly competitive.  We face substantial competition from established companies in each of the markets we serve.  We principally compete with KLA-Tencor and Therma-Wave.  We compete to a lesser extent with companies such as Dai Nippon Screen, Nanometrics, Sopra, August Technologies and Leica.  Each of our products also competes with products that use different metrology techniques.  Some of our competitors have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources, broader product offerings and service capabilities and larger installed customer bases than we do.  As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies or market developments by devoting greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of products, which could impair sales of our products.  Moreover, there may be significant merger and acquisition activity among our competitors and potential competitors.  These transactions by our competitors and potential competitors may provide them with a competitive advantage over us by enabling them to rapidly expand their product offerings and service capabilities to meet a broader range of customer needs.  Many of our customers and potential customers in the semiconductor device manufacturing industry are large companies that require global support and service for their semiconductor capital equipment.  While we believe that our global support and service infrastructure is sufficient to meet the needs of our customers and potential customers, our larger competitors have more extensive infrastructures than we do, which could place us at a disadvantage when competing for the business of global semiconductor device manufacturers.

        Many of our competitors are investing heavily in the development of new systems that will compete directly with ours.   We have from time to time selectively reduced prices on our systems in order to protect our market share, and competitive pressures may necessitate further price reductions.  We expect our competitors in each product area to continue to improve the design and performance of their products and to introduce new products with competitive prices and performance characteristics.  Such product introductions by our competitors would likely cause us to decrease the prices of our systems and increase the level of discounts we grant our customers.

Because of the high cost of switching equipment vendors in our markets, it is sometimes difficult for us to win customers from our competitors even if our systems are superior to theirs

        We believe that once a semiconductor device manufacturer has selected one vendor's capital equipment for a production-line application, the manufacturer generally relies upon that capital equipment and, to the extent possible, subsequent generations of the same vendor's equipment, for the life of the application.  Once a vendor's equipment has been installed in a production line application, a semiconductor device manufacturer must often make substantial technical modifications and may experience production-line downtime in order to switch to another vendor's equipment.  Accordingly, unless our systems offer performance or cost advantages that outweigh a customer's expense of switching to our systems, it will be difficult for us to achieve significant sales to that customer once it has selected another vendor's capital equipment for an application.

We must attract and retain key personnel with knowledge of semiconductor device manufacturing and metrology equipment to help support our future growth, and competition for such personnel in our industry is high

        Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our key management, engineering, sales and marketing, customer support, finance and manufacturing personnel.  The loss of any of these key personnel, who would be extremely difficult to replace, could harm our business and operating results.  During downturns in our industry, we have often experienced significant employee attrition, and we may experience further attrition in the event of a future downturn.  Although we have employment and noncompetition agreements with key members of our senior management team, including Messrs. McLaughlin, Loiterman and Roth, these individuals or other key employees may nevertheless leave our company.  We do not have key person life insurance on any of our executives. In addition, to support our future growth, we will need to attract and retain additional qualified employees.   Competition for such personnel in our industry is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining qualified employees.

We manufacture all of our systems at a single facility, and any prolonged disruption in the operations of that facility could have a material adverse effect on our revenues

        We produce all of our systems in our manufacturing facility located in Ledgewood, New Jersey.  Our manufacturing processes are highly complex and require sophisticated and costly equipment and a specially designed facility.  As a result, any prolonged disruption in the operations of our manufacturing facility, whether due to technical or labor difficulties, destruction of or damage as a result of a fire or any other reason, could seriously harm our ability to satisfy our customer order deadlines.  If we cannot timely deliver our systems, our revenues could be adversely affected.

We rely upon an independent distributor for a significant portion of our sales, and a disruption in our relationship could have a negative impact on our sales in Japan

        Historically, a portion of our sales in Japan have been made to our sole independent distributor, Tokyo Electron Limited (TEL).  In 2001, 2002, 2003 and for the first six months ended June 30, 2004, sales to TEL accounted for 14.8%, 6.8%, 9.5% and 9.3% of our revenues.  TEL also provides field service to end users of our products.  The activities of TEL are not within our control.  A reduction in the sales or service efforts or financial viability of TEL, or a change in our relationship with them, could harm our sales, our financial results and our ability to support end users of our products.

Because we derive a significant portion of our revenues from sales in Asia, our sales and results of operations could be adversely affected by the instability of Asian economies

        Our sales to customers in Asian markets represented approximately 36.6%, 30.1%, 39.9% and 58.3% of our revenues in 2001, 2002, 2003 and for the first six months ended June 30, 2004.  Countries in the Asia Pacific region, including Japan, Korea, China, Singapore and Taiwan, each of which accounted for a significant portion of our business in that region, have experienced currency, banking and equity market weaknesses in the past.  We expect that turbulence in the Asian markets could adversely affect our sales in future periods.

Due to our significant level of international sales, we are subject to operational, financial and political risks such as unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs, political and economic instability, outbreaks of hostilities, adverse tax consequences and difficulties in managing foreign sales representatives and foreign branch operations

        International sales accounted for approximately 53.7%, 40.6%, 65.4% and 70.9% of our revenues in 2001, 2002, 2003 and for the first six months ended June 30, 2004.  We anticipate that international sales will account for a significant portion of our revenue for at least the next five years.  Due to the significant level of our international sales, we are subject to material risks which include:

        Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements including tariffs and other market barriers.  The semiconductor device industry is a high-visibility industry in many of the European and Asian countries in which we sell our products.  Because the governments of these countries have provided extensive financial support to our semiconductor device manufacturing customers in these countries, we believe that our customers could be disproportionately affected by any trade embargoes, excise taxes or other restrictions imposed by their governments on trade with United States companies such as ourselves.  Any such restrictions could lead to a reduction in our sales to customers in these countries.

        Political and economic instability.   We are subject to various global risks related to political and economic instabilities in countries in which we derive sales.  If terrorist activities, armed conflict, civil or military unrest or political instability occurs outside of the U.S., such events may result in reduced demand for our products.  There is considerable political instability in Taiwan related to its disputes with China and in South Korea related to its disputes with North Korea.  In addition, several Asian countries, particularly Japan, have experienced significant economic instability.  An outbreak of hostilities or other political upheaval in Taiwan or South Korea, or an economic downturn in Japan, would likely harm the operations of our customers in these countries, causing our sales to suffer.  The effect of such events on our revenues could be material because we derive substantial revenues from sales to semiconductor device foundries in Taiwan such as TSMC and UMC, from memory chip manufacturers in South Korea such as Hynix and Samsung, and from semiconductor device manufacturers in Japan such as NEC and Toshiba.

        Difficulties in staffing and managing foreign branch operations.  During periods of tension between the governments of the United States and other countries, it is often difficult for United States companies such as ourselves to staff and manage operations in such countries.

Since a substantial portion of our revenues are derived from sales in other countries yet are denominated in U.S. dollars, we could experience a significant decline in sales or experience collection problems in the event the dollar becomes more expensive relative to local currencies

        A substantial portion of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars.  As a result, if the dollar rises in value in relation to foreign currencies, our systems will become more expensive to customers outside the United States and less competitive with systems produced by competitors outside the United States.  Such conditions could negatively impact our international sales.  Foreign sales also expose us to collection risk in the event it becomes more expensive for our foreign customers to convert their local currencies into U.S. dollars.

Terrorist attacks and terrorist threats may negatively impact all aspects of our operations, revenues, costs and stock price

        The terrorist attacks in September 2001 in the United States and the U.S. response to these attacks and the resulting decline in consumer confidence has had a substantial adverse impact on the economy.  Any similar future events may disrupt our operations or those of our customers and suppliers.  In addition, these events have had and may continue to have an adverse impact on the U.S. and world economy in general and consumer confidence and spending in particular, which could harm our sales.  Any of these events could increase volatility in the U.S. and world financial markets, which could harm our stock price and may limit the capital resources available to us and our customers or suppliers.  This could have a significant impact on our operating results, revenues and costs and may result in increased volatility in the market price of our common stock.

We may choose to acquire new and complementary businesses, products or technologies instead of developing them ourselves, and may be unable to complete these acquisitions or may not be able to successfully integrate an acquired business in a cost-effective and non-disruptive manner

        Our success depends on our ability to continually enhance and broaden our product offerings in response to changing technologies, customer demands and competitive pressures.  To this end, we may choose to acquire new and complementary businesses, products, or technologies instead of developing them ourselves.  We may, however, face competition for acquisition targets from larger and more established companies with greater financial resources, making it more difficult for us to complete acquisitions.  We do not know if we will be able to complete any acquisitions, or whether we will be able to successfully integrate any acquired business, operate it profitably or retain its key employees.  Integrating any business, product or technology we acquire could be expensive and time-consuming, could disrupt our ongoing business and could distract our management.  In addition, in order to finance any acquisitions, we might need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financings.  In that event, we could be forced to obtain financing on terms that are not favorable to us and, in the case of equity financing, that result in dilution to our stockholders.  If we are unable to integrate any acquired entities, products or technologies effectively, our business, financial condition and operating results will suffer.  In addition, any amortization of intangible assets or other assets or charges resulting from the costs of acquisitions could harm our business and operating results.

If we deliver systems with defects, our credibility will be harmed and the sales and market acceptance of our systems will decrease

        Our systems are complex and sometimes have contained errors, defects and bugs when introduced.  If we deliver systems with errors, defects or bugs, our credibility and the market acceptance and sales of our systems could be harmed. Further, if our systems contain errors, defects or bugs, we may be required to expend significant capital and resources to alleviate such problems.  Defects could also lead to product liability as a result of product liability lawsuits against us or against our customers.  We have agreed to indemnify our customers in some circumstances against liability arising from defects in our systems.  Our product liability policy currently provides $1.0 million to $2.0 million of coverage per claim, depending on location of claim, with an overall umbrella limit of $4.0 million.  In the event of a successful product liability claim, we could be obligated to pay damages significantly in excess of our product liability insurance limits.

Provisions of our charter documents and Delaware law could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay, deter or prevent a change in control of our company

        Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may inhibit changes in control of our company not approved by our board of directors.  These provisions also limit the circumstances in which a premium can be paid for the common stock, and in which a proxy contest for control of our board may be initiated.  These provisions provide for:

• a prohibition on stockholder actions through written consent;

• a requirement that special meetings of stockholders be called only by our chief executive officer or board of directors;

• advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and director nominations by stockholders;

• limitations on the ability of stockholders to amend, alter or repeal our by-laws; and

• the authority of our board to issue, without stockholder approval, preferred stock with such terms as the board may determine.

         We will also be afforded the protections of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which could have similar effects.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

        Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating our "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

            The Company's management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud.  Because of the inherent limitations in any system of disclosure controls and procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all instances of error or fraud, if any, within the Company may be detected.  Nonetheless, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer believe that the disclosure controls and procedures we currently have in place are effective.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting.

        There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our second fiscal quarter of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II    OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings

      On September 30, 2003, our wholly-owned subsidiary, ISOA, Inc. ("ISOA") filed a counterclaim in the Dallas, Texas District Courts in response to a claim filed on September 23, 2003 against us and ISOA by August Technology Corporation ("August") and STI, Inc. ("STI") related to a commercial dispute.  The dispute arose from a December 24, 1997 Development Agreement between ISOA and STI.  August acquired STI from ASTI Holdings, Ltd. in April 2003.

          Under the Development Agreement, ISOA agreed to provide to STI certain engineering resources in the development of software for STI's semiconductor metrology systems.  In return, STI agreed to pay to ISOA a minimum royalty of $1.0 million of which approximately one-third was paid.  August alleged that ISOA did not fulfill its obligations under the Development Agreement and sought a judgment against ISOA for repayment of the monies previously paid and attorney's fees incurred in bringing this action.  We had maintained that ISOA fulfilled its obligations under the Development Agreement and that August remained obligated to pay all amounts as agreed to under the Development Agreement.  August further alleged that ISOA did not perform substantially in order to justify any additional payments.  We further believed that intellectual property delivered by ISOA under the terms of the Development Agreement may have been and continued to be used in current systems on the market from August.   ISOA's counterclaim sought full payment of the minimum royalty, ongoing royalty payments for any August macro defection inspection tools using ISOA's property, damages, costs, and attorneys' fees.

          On August 6, 2004, we entered into a settlement agreement with August.  Under the terms of the settlement, both companies have agreed to dismiss all claims against each other related to this matter.  We will receive a one-time payment of $502,500 from ASTI Holdings in connection with the settlement, which will be reflected in our consolidated financial statements for the three months ending September 30, 2004.

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 We held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 18, 2004.  Out of 16,712,346 shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at such meeting, there were present in person or by proxy 15,043,121 shares.  At the Annual Meeting the stockholders of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. approved the following matters:

               An election of directors was held with the following individuals being elected to the Board of Directors:

Daniel H. Berry, 12,892,270 votes cast for and 2,150,851 votes withheld;

Thomas G. Greig, 14,702,480 votes cast for and 340,641 votes withheld; and

Richard F. Spanier, 12,954,819 votes cast for and 2,088,302 votes withheld.

The following is a list of our directors who did not stand for election at such Annual Meeting:  David Belluck, Paul Craig, Paul F. McLaughlin, Carl E. Ring, Jr. and Aubrey C. Tobey.

Proposal II submitted to a vote of stockholders at the meeting was to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent auditors of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2004.  Votes cast were as follows:

14,999,355 votes cast for, 43,419 votes cast against and 347 votes abstained.

Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

        (a) Exhibits

        Exhibit No.      Description

31.1             Certification of Paul F. McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Securities Exchange
                    Act Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2             Certification of  Steven R. Roth, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
                    Rule 13a-14(a).

32.1             Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
                    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Paul F. McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer
                    of Rudolph Technologies, Inc.

32.2             Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
                    the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Steven R. Roth, Chief Financial Officer of
                    Rudolph Technologies, Inc.

        (b) Reports on Form 8-K

1. On April 26, 2004, Rudolph Technologies, Inc. furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K (Item's 7 and 12).  The report contained information regarding the press release reporting our financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

 

---

 

 

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized

                                                                                                        Rudolph Technologies, Inc.

Date: August 9, 2004                                                                 By:  /s/ Paul F. McLaughlin                                

                                                                                                               Paul F. McLaughlin

                                                                                                                Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: August 9, 2004                                                                  By:   /s/ Steven R. Roth                                     

                                                                                                                Steven R. Roth

                                                                                                                Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

Date:  August 9, 2004

By:  /s/ Paul F. McLaughlin

Paul F. McLaughlin

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 9, 2004

By:  /s/ Steven R. Roth

Steven R. Roth

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EXHIBIT 32.2