Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

for the quarterly period ended May 1, 2005

or

for the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 1-6395

SEMTECH CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

200 Flynn Road, Camarillo, California, 93012-8790

(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (805) 498-2111

Indicate by check mark, whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant has required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark, whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨

Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding at June 3, 2005: 73,909,756

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

SEMTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

1

SEMTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes.

2

SEMTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

3

SEMTECH CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the included disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

In the opinion of the Company, these unaudited statements contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of Semtech Corporation and subsidiaries as of May 1, 2005, and the results of their operations for the first quarter then ended and their cash flows for the first quarter then ended.

The results reported in these condensed consolidated financial statements should not be regarded as necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any subsequent period or for the entire year.

Fiscal Year

The Company reports on the basis of 52 and 53 week periods and ends its fiscal year on the last Sunday in January. All quarters consist of 13 weeks, except for one 14-week quarter in 53-week years. The other quarters generally end on the last Sunday of April, July, and October. The fiscal year that ended January 30, 2005 consisted of 53 weeks, with the quarter that ended in October 2004 consisting of 14 weeks and all other quarters consisting of 13 weeks. The fiscal year that ends January 29, 2006 will consists of 52 weeks, with all quarters consisting of 13 weeks.

Income Taxes

The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes as set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (SFAS 109), “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Current income taxes payable and deferred income taxes resulting from temporary differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities are separately classified on the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets.

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated condensed financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax liability together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated condensed balance sheet. We must assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Unless a valuation allowance relates to benefits from stock option exercise activity, to the extent we change the valuation allowance in a period, the change is recorded through the tax provision in the statement of operations. If a valuation allowance relates to a benefit from stock option exercise activity, any adjustment to the valuation allowance would be recorded to paid-in-capital in the period of the adjustment.

As a result of historical tax deductions associated with stock option exercise activity, the Company has generated substantial U.S. net operating loss carryforwards. The size of the deferred tax assets attributable to Federal net operating losses and credit carryforwards, compared to the projected levels of Federal taxable income, has elevated the Company’s concern regarding the ability to fully utilize these deferred tax assets prior to expiration. Accordingly, the Company has provided for a valuation allowance to address this concern. As of May 1, 2005 and

4

January 30, 2005, the Company has established $30.7 million and $30.1 million, respectively, of valuation reserves. Management continually evaluates the Company’s deferred tax assets to assess whether it is likely that the deferred tax assets will be realized. If management ever determined that a deferred tax asset was not likely to be realized, a write-down of that asset would be required.

U.S. federal and state income taxes have not been provided for the undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign operations. The Company policy is to leave the income permanently reinvested offshore. The amount of earnings designated as indefinitely reinvested offshore is based upon the actual deployment of such earnings in the Company’s offshore assets and expectations of the future cash needs of U.S. and foreign entities. Income tax considerations are also a factor in determining the amount of foreign earnings to be repatriated.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share are computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share incorporate the incremental shares issuable upon the assumed exercise of stock options. The weighted average number of shares used to compute basic earnings per share in the first quarters of fiscal years 2006 and 2005 were 73,845,000 and 74,226,000, respectively. The weighted average number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share in the first three months of fiscal years 2006 and 2005 were 76,708,000 and 78,819,000, respectively.

Options to purchase approximately 3,611,000 and 2,882,000 shares, respectively, were not included in the computation of the first quarters of fiscal years 2006 and 2005 diluted net income per share because such options were considered anti-dilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for its employee stock options under the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, and has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.”

SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, permits companies to recognize, as expense over the vesting period, the fair value of all stock-based awards on the date of grant. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Option valuation models also require the input of highly subjective assumptions such as expected option life and expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s stock-based compensation plans have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, management believes that existing option valuation models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of awards from the plan. Therefore, as permitted, the Company applies the existing accounting rules under APB No. 25 and provides pro forma net income and pro forma net income per share disclosures for stock-based awards made during the year as if the fair value method defined in SFAS No. 123, as amended, had been applied. Net income and net income per share for the first quarters of fiscal years 2006 and 2005 would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:

5

The pro forma effect on net income for the first quarters of fiscal years 2006 and 2005 may not be representative of the pro forma effect on net income of future years because the Company has not applied the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting for pro forma compensation expense to options granted prior to January 30, 1995.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The pronouncement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years after November 23, 2004. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, the results of operations or liquidity.

On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure under this provision is no longer an alternative.

The provisions of this statement are scheduled to become effective for annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Assuming this new standard is implemented as scheduled, the Company plans to adopt this in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 that ends on April 30, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the two methods of adoption allowed by SFAS No. 123(R): the modified-prospective transition method and the modified-retrospective transition method. The exact impact of adopting this pronouncement cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on many factors, including the levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had the Company adopted this pronouncement in prior periods, the impact of this pronouncement would approximate the impact of SFAS No. 123 described in the disclosure of the pro forma results in this Note 1, under the heading “Stock-Based Compensation”.

Prior Program

On January 4, 2001, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a program to repurchase up to $50.0 million of its common stock and registered convertible subordinated notes. In fiscal year 2002, the Company indicated that its Board had authorized an additional $50.0 million in buybacks, increasing the total amount authorized under the buyback program to $100.0 million. In fiscal year 2003, the Company indicated that its Board had authorized an additional $100.0 million in buybacks, increasing the total amount authorized under the buyback program to $200.0 million. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Company indicated that its Board had authorized an additional $75.0 million in buybacks, increasing the total amount authorized under the buyback program to $275.0 million. On July 18, 2003 the Company called the remaining outstanding balance of convertible subordinated notes and amended the buyback program to authorize only the repurchase of common stock. This buyback program expired with $13.1 million of unused authorization on January 25, 2004.

As of January 25, 2004, the Company had repurchased 2,421,200 shares of its common stock at a cost of $49.4 million under this program. All repurchased shares of common stock have been reissued as a result of stock option exercises. As of January 25, 2004, the Company had repurchased 234,999 convertible subordinated notes (face value of $1,000 each) for $212.5 million in cash in open market transactions. The Company retired all repurchased notes and called the remaining convertible subordinated notes on July 18, 2003.

6

Current Program

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a program under which the Company could repurchase up to $50.0 million of its common stock. As of May 1, 2005, the Company had repurchased 2,390,700 shares of its common stock at a cost of $47.3 million under this program. Of the repurchased shares, 174,407 have been reissued as a result of stock option exercises and the remaining balance are being held as treasury shares. Treasury shares are expected to be reissued in the future as a result of stock option exercises.

Temporary and long-term investments consist of government, bank and corporate obligations. Temporary investments mature within twelve months of the balance sheet date. Long-term investments have maturities in excess of one year from the date of the balance sheet. As of May 1, 2005, the Company had $126.5 million of temporary investments and $96.0 million of long-term investments. As of January 30, 2005, the Company had $108.2 million of temporary investments and $111.6 million of long-term investments. Certain short-term, highly liquid investments, namely money-market accounts are accounted for as cash and cash equivalents.

The Company classifies its investments as “available for sale” because it expects to possibly sell some securities prior to maturity. The Company’s investments are subject to market risk, primarily interest rate and credit risk. The Company’s investments are managed by a limited number of outside professional managers within investment guidelines set by the Company. Such guidelines include security type, credit quality and maturity and are intended to limit market risk by restricting the Company’s investments to high quality debt instruments with relatively short-term maturities.

As a result of changes in the market value of investments, the Company included $281,000 and $674,000 of unrealized loss, net of tax, in comprehensive income for the first quarters of fiscal year 2006 and 2005, respectively. The tax associated with these comprehensive income items were benefit of $189,000 and expense of $453,000 in the first quarters of fiscal year 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Temporary and long-term investments consist of the following security types, stated at fair market value and book value, with the difference in these amounts booked as part of comprehensive income:

Investments and interest from cash and cash equivalents generated interest income of $1.9 million and $1.1 million in the first quarters of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively.

7

Inventories consisted of the following:

On March 28, 2003, the Company announced that it had resolved a customer dispute. Under the terms of the settlement, the Company agreed to pay the customer $12.0 million in cash in two equal annual installments, plus rebates on the future purchase of certain products by the customer through the end of March 2005. The rebates, which can be up to 10%, are dependent upon the amount of eligible products the customer purchases. The Company paid the first $6.0 million installment in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004 and paid the second $6.0 million installment in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. Amounts accrued for the rebates during fiscal years 2004 and 2005 are not material. The Company is vigorously pursuing insurance coverage for the full value of the settlement, although it is unable to estimate the size of the eventual insurance settlement, if any, or to give a tentative date for when an insurance settlement might be reached.

On June 22, 2001, we were notified by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (“State”) that we may have liability associated with the clean-up of the one-third acre Davis Chemical Company site in Los Angeles, California. We have been included in the clean-up program because we are one of the companies that used the Davis Chemical Company site for waste recycling and/or disposal between 1949 and 1990. We have joined with other potentially responsible parties in an effort to resolve this matter with the State. The group has entered into a Consent Order with the State that requires the group to perform a soils investigation at the site and submit a draft remediation plan. The group has submitted various reports to the State for review, including the results of limited groundwater sampling. The State has the right to require the removal of contaminated soils and to expand the scope of work to include further investigation of groundwater contamination. The Consent Order does not require the group to remediate the site. To date, our share of the group’s expenses has not been material and has been expensed. At this time there is not a specific proposal or budget with respect to additional studies or the clean-up of the site. Thus, we cannot reasonably determine the potential additional amount of costs, if any, associated with this matter and, accordingly, we have not established a reserve for this matter.

The Company uses an environmental consulting firm, specializing in hydrogeology, to perform periodic monitoring of the groundwater at the facility in Newbury Park, California that it leased for approximately forty years. Certain contaminants have been found in the local groundwater. Monitoring results over a number of years indicate that contaminants are coming from adjacent facilities. It is currently not possible to determine the ultimate amount of possible future clean-up costs, if any, that may be required of the Company for this site. There are no claims pending with respect environmental matters at the Newbury Park site. Accordingly, no reserve for clean up has been provided at this time.

Effective June 11, 1998, the Company’s board of directors approved a Stockholder Protection Agreement to issue a Right for each share of common stock outstanding on July 31, 1998 and each share issued thereafter (subject to certain limitations). These Rights, if not cancelled by the Board of Directors, can be exercised into a certain number of shares of Series X Junior Participating Preferred Stock after a person or group of affiliated persons acquire 25% or more of the Company’s common stock and subsequently allow the holder to receive certain additional Company or acquirer common stock if the Company is acquired in a hostile takeover.

From time to time, the Company is approached by persons seeking payment based on the Company’s alleged use of their intellectual property. The Company is also periodically named as a defendant in lawsuits involving intellectual property and other matters that are routine to the nature of its business. Management is of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of all such pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements.

8

Late in fiscal year 2004, the Company established a deferred compensation plan for certain officers and key executives that allows participants to defer a portion of their compensation for future distribution at various times permitted by the plan. A portion of the employee’s deferral is matched by the Company, with the match subject to a vesting period. Compensation expense under this plan totaled $159,000 and $140,000 the first quarters of fiscal year 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company’s liability for deferred compensation totaled $2.7 million as of May 1, 2005 and $2.4 million as of January 30, 2005, and is included in other long-term liabilities.

The Company has purchased whole life insurance on the lives of certain of the deferred compensation plan participants. This company-owned life insurance is intended to cover a majority of the costs of the deferred compensation plan. The cash surrender value of the company-owned life insurance was $2.7 million as of May 1, 2005 and $2.2 million as of January 30, 2005, and is included in other assets.

The Company has agreed to indemnify its directors and certain Company executives against certain liabilities incurred in connection with their duties as directors or executives of the Company.

The Company’s general warranty policy provides for repair or replacement of defective parts. In some cases a refund of the purchase price is offered. In certain instances the Company has agreed to other warranty terms, including some indemnification provisions.

The product warranty accrual, which is included in cost of sales, reflects the Company’s best estimate of probable liability under its product warranties. The Company accrues for known warranty issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated, and accrues for estimated incurred but unidentified issues based on historical experience.

The following table details the change in the product warranty.

If there is a substantial increase in the rate of customer claims, if the Company’s estimates of probable losses relating to identified warranty exposures prove inaccurate, or if its efforts to contractually limit liability prove inadequate, the Company may record a charge against future cost of sales. Over at least the last decade, warranty expense has been immaterial to our financial statements.

In the normal course of its business, the Company indemnifies other parties, including customers, distributors, and lessors, with respect to certain matters. These obligations typically arise pursuant to contracts under which the Company agrees to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations and covenants related to certain matters, such as acts or omissions of Company employees, infringement of third-party intellectual property rights, and certain environmental matters. The Company has also entered into agreements with its directors and certain Company executives indemnifying them against certain liabilities incurred in connection with their duties, and the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations with respect to the Company’s directors and employees. In some cases there are limits on and exceptions to the Company’s potential indemnification liability. The Company cannot estimate the amount of potential future payments, if any, that it might be required to make as a result of these agreements. Over at least the last decade, the Company has not incurred any significant expense as a result of agreements of this type. Accordingly, the Company has not accrued any amounts for such indemnification obligations. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will not incur expense under these indemnification provisions in the future.

9

The Company operates in two reportable segments: Standard Semiconductor Products and Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products. The Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products segment has represented less than 10% of net sales for the last three fiscal years.

The Standard Semiconductor Products segment makes up the vast majority of overall sales and includes the power management, protection, test and measurement, advanced communications and human input device product lines. The Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products segment includes the Company’s line of assembly and rectifier devices, which are the remaining products from its original founding as a supplier into the military, aerospace and industrial equipment markets. It also includes custom integrated circuits.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described above and in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2005 in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates segment performance based on net sales and operating income of each segment. Management does not track segment data or evaluate segment performance on additional financial information. As such, there are no separately identifiable segment assets nor are there any separately identifiable statements of income data (below operating income).

The Company does not track or assign assets to individual reportable segments. Likewise, depreciation expense and capital additions are also not tracked by reportable segments.

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, an end-customer that is a leading manufacturer of cellular phones, and that buys product directly from the Company, accounted for approximately 11% of net sales. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, two of the Company’s Asian distributors accounted for approximately 12% and 11% of net sales, respectively. No single end-customer or distributor accounted for 10% or more of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005.

As of May 1, 2005, two of the Company’s Asian distributors accounted for approximately 14% and 10%, respectively, of net accounts receivable. Sales to our customers are generally made on open account, subject to credit limits we may impose, and the receivables are subject to the risk of being uncollectible.

10

A summary of net external sales by region follows. The Company does not track customer sales by region for each individual reporting segment.

Long-lived assets located outside the United States as of May 1, 2005 and January 30, 2005 were approximately $19.6 million and $15.7 million, respectively. Some of these assets are at locations owned or operated by the Company’s suppliers in order to facilitate production for the Company.

The Company relies on a limited number of outside subcontractors and suppliers for the production of silicon wafers, packaging and certain other tasks. Disruption or termination of supply sources or subcontractors could delay shipments and could have a material adverse effect on the Company. Several of the Company’s outside subcontractors and suppliers, including third-party foundries that supply silicon wafers, are located in foreign countries, including China, Malaysia, the Philippines and Germany. A significant amount of the Company’s assembly and test operations are conducted by third-party contractors in Malaysia and the Philippines, and the largest source of silicon wafers come from an outside foundry located in China.

Comprehensive income consisted of the following:

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations together with the condensed financial statements and the notes to condensed financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical information or statements of current condition and relate to matters such as our future financial performance, future operational performance, and our plans, objectives and expectations. Some forward-looking statements may be identified by use of terms such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “believes”, “projects”, “should”, “will”, “plans” and similar words. In light of the risks and uncertainties inherent in all such projected matters, forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved or that any of our operating expectations or financial forecasts will be realized. Financial results could differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements, due to factors including, but not limited to, those set forth in the “Risk Factors” and “Quantitative and

11

Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk” sections of this Form 10-Q and the “Risk Factors” section of the our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2005. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

We design, produce and market a broad range of products that are sold principally to customers in the computer, communications and industrial markets. Our products are designed into a wide variety of end applications, including notebook and desktop computers, computer graphics, personal digital assistants (PDAs), cellular phones, wireline networks, wireless base stations, set-top-boxes and automated test equipment (ATE). Products within the communications market include products for local area networks, metro and wide area networks, cellular phones and base stations. Industrial applications include ATE, medical devices and factory automation systems. Our end-customers are primarily original equipment manufacturers and their suppliers, including Apple, Agilent, Cisco, Compal Electronics, Dell, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Intel, LG Electronics, Motorola, Quanta Computer, Samsung, Siemens, Sony and Unisys.

We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. Product design and engineering revenue is recognized during the period in which services are performed. We defer revenue recognition on shipment of certain products to distributors where return privileges exist until the products are sold through to end-users. Gross profit is equal to our net sales less our cost of sales. Our cost of sales includes materials, depreciation on fixed assets used in the manufacturing process, shipping costs, direct labor and overhead. We determine the cost of inventory by the first-in, first-out method. Our operating costs and expenses generally consist of selling, general and administrative (SG&A), product development and engineering costs (R&D), costs associated with acquisitions, and other operating related charges.

Most of our sales to customers are made on the basis of individual customer purchase orders. Many large commercial customers include terms in their purchase orders, which provide liberal cancellation provisions. Trends within the industry toward shorter lead-times and “just-in-time” deliveries have resulted in our reduced ability to predict future shipments. As a result, we rely on orders received and shipped within the same quarter for a significant portion of our sales. Sales made directly to original equipment manufacturers during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 were 42% of net sales. The remaining 58% of net sales were made through independent distributors.

We divide and operate our business based on two reportable segments: Standard Semiconductor Products and Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products. We evaluate segment performance based on net sales and operating income of each segment. We do not track segment data or evaluate segment performance on additional financial information. We do not track balance sheet items by individual reportable segments. As such, there are no separately identifiable segment assets nor are there any separately identifiable statements of income data (below operating income). The Standard Semiconductor Products segment makes up the vast majority of overall sales and includes our power management, protection, test and measurement, advanced communications and human input device product lines. The Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products segment includes our line of assembly and rectifier devices, which are the remaining products from our founding as a supplier into the military and aerospace market. It also includes other products made up of custom integrated circuits.

Our business involves reliance on foreign-based entities. Most of our outside subcontractors and suppliers, including third-party foundries that supply silicon wafers, are located in foreign countries, including China, Malaysia, Korea, the Philippines and Germany. For our most recent fiscal year, which ended January 30, 2005, approximately 59% of our silicon in terms of finished wafers purchased were manufactured in China. Foreign sales for our most recent fiscal year, fiscal year 2005 constituted approximately 74% of our net sales. Approximately 90% of foreign sales in fiscal year 2005 were to customers located in the Asia-Pacific region. The remaining sales were primarily to customers in Europe, Canada, and Mexico.

12

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

On an ongoing basis, we evaluate and discuss with our audit committee our estimates, including those related to our allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns, inventory reserves, asset impairments and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, which together form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Our critical accounting policies and estimates do not vary between our two reportable segments. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect the significant judgments and estimates we use in the preparation of our consolidated condensed financial statements:

Accounting for Temporary and Long-Term Investments

Our temporary and long-term investments consist of government, bank and corporate obligations. Temporary investments mature within twelve months of the balance sheet date. Long-term investments have maturities in excess of one year from the date of the balance sheet. We classify our investments as “available for sale” because we expect to possibly sell some securities prior to maturity. We included any unrealized gain or loss, net of tax, in the comprehensive income, as detailed in Note 8.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. If we are aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us, we record an allowance to reduce the net receivable to the amount we reasonably believe we will be able to collect from the customer. For all other customers, we recognize allowances for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due, the current business environment and our historical experience. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate or if economic conditions worsen, additional allowances may be required in the future.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize product revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. Product design and engineering revenue is recognized during the period in which services are performed. We defer revenue recognition on shipment of products to certain customers, principally distributors, where return privileges exist until these products are sold through to end-users or the return privilege lapses. The estimated deferred gross margin on these sales, where there are no outstanding receivables, are recorded on the balance sheet under the heading of “Deferred Revenue.” We record a provision for estimated sales returns in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. We base these estimates on historical sales returns and other known factors. Actual returns could be different from our estimates and current provisions for sales returns and allowances, resulting in future charges to earnings.

Inventory Valuation

Our inventories are stated at lower of cost or market and consist of materials, labor and overhead. We determine the cost of inventory by the first-in, first-out method. At each balance sheet date, we evaluate our ending inventories for excess quantities and obsolescence. This evaluation includes analyses of sales levels by product and projections of future demand. In order to state our inventory at lower of cost or market, we maintain reserves against our inventory. If future demand or market conditions are less favorable than our projections, a write-down of inventory may be required, and would be reflected in cost of goods sold in the period the revision is made.

13

Contingencies and Litigation

We are involved in various disputes and litigation matters as a claimant and as defendant. We record any amounts recovered in these matters when collection is certain. We record liabilities for claims against us when the losses are probable and estimable. Any amounts recorded are based on reviews by outside counsel, in-house counsel and management. Actual results may differ from estimates.

Accounting for Income Taxes

SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for the effect of income taxes. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. Variations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could materially impact our financial position or our results of operations.

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated condensed financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating our actual current tax liability together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated condensed balance sheet. We must assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Unless a valuation allowance relates to benefits from stock option exercise activity, to the extent we change the valuation allowance in a period, the change is recorded through the tax provision in the statement of operations. If a valuation allowance relates to a benefit from stock option exercise activity, any adjustment to the valuation allowance would be recorded to paid-in-capital in the period of the adjustment. Management continually evaluates our deferred tax assets to assess whether it is likely that the deferred tax assets will be realized.

We are subject to income taxes in both the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax impact is uncertain. The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. We recognize probable liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the United States and other tax jurisdictions based on an estimate of the ultimate resolution of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes may be due. In the current period, no change to our tax contingency reserve of $1.2 million was recorded. Although we believe the estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different than what is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals. Should additional taxes be assessed as a result of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our income tax provision and net income in the period or periods for which that determination is made could result.

In addition to the risks to the effective tax rate discussed above, the effective tax rate reflected in forward-looking statements is based on current enacted tax law. Significant changes in enacted tax law could materially affect these estimates.

On October 22, 2004 the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Act”) was signed into law and creates a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate foreign subsidiary earnings by providing an elective 85% dividends received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign corporations. The deduction is subject to a number of limitations and requirements, including adoption of a specific domestic reinvestment plan for the repatriated funds. On January 13, 2005 the U.S. Treasury published Notice 2005-10 providing guidance on the implementation of the repatriation deduction. Based on our current understanding of the Act, we believe that we may repatriate from $0 to approximately $38 million in dividends subject to the elective 85% dividends received deduction generating a corresponding tax provision liability between $0 and $5 million. We expect to confirm our understanding of this provision and seek the required Chief Executive Officer and Board of Directors approval of the required domestic reinvestment plan within the timeframe the incentive is available.

14

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our statements of operations data expressed as a percentage of revenues.

Comparison Of The First Quarters Ended May 1, 2005 and April 25, 2004

We report on the basis of 52 and 53 week periods and end our fiscal year on the last Sunday in January. All quarters consist of 13 weeks, except for one 14 week quarter in 53-week years. The first quarters of fiscal year 2006 and 2005 were each made up of 13 weeks.

Net Sales. Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 were $56.2 million, a decline of 9% compared to $61.9 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. Semiconductor industry conditions were weaker in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 compared to the prior year period. End-application demand for our products in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 compared to the prior year period was most impacted by an approximately 87% decline in sales of products used in ATE applications and an estimated 58% increase in product sold into industrial, military and other end-applications. Comparing the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 with the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, our two largest end-application segments of cell phone and notebook computer were both down, about 9% and 2%, respectively. Sales of our products used in communications infrastructure or wireline applications was up about 22% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 compared with the first quarter of fiscal year 2005.

Our estimate of sales by major end-markets is detailed below:

Standard Semiconductor Products represented 95% of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, while 5% were represented by the Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products segment. Sales of our Standard Semiconductor Products segment were 96% of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 and Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products’ sales were 4%. Sales of Standard Semiconductor Products decreased 10% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the prior year period. Sales of Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products increased 14% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 as compared to the prior year period.

15

The 10% decline in sales of Standard Semiconductor Products in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 reflected general weakness in the computing, communications and industrial end-markets. As noted above, sales of products used in notebook, cellular phone and ATE applications, all of which are from the Standard Semiconductor Products segment, were all down compared with the first quarter of the prior year. These three end-applications represent more than 50% of Standard Semiconductor Products’ sales.

Sales of our Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products, which are mostly sold into military and industrial applications (part of the end-market of “Industrial/Other”) increased 14% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 compared to the prior year period due to improved demand from industrial and military customers. These products are older technology products and other non-strategic product offerings, which we have de-emphasized due to their lower revenue and margin opportunities.

Gross Profit. Gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 was $31.7 million, compared to $36.8 million for the prior year period. The decrease was due to a 9% decline in sales and a decline in gross margin to 56%, down from 59% in the prior year first quarter.

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, we sold $18,000 of previously written-down inventory and $297,000 of previously written-down inventory was sold in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005.

The decline in gross margin from 59% to 56% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 was most impacted by a greater than 85% decline in sales of our test and measurement products. The gross margin decline also reflected lower manufacturing overhead utilization and lower average selling prices in the desktop computing, cellular phone and notebook computing segments during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006.

We have experienced long-term price reductions in our manufacturing costs, in part due to our outsourcing of most manufacturing functions. However, declines in the average selling prices of our parts, which is typical in the semiconductor industry, tend to offset much of the manufacturing cost savings. Our gross margin is most impacted by the mix of products used in particular end-applications.

Operating Costs and Expenses. Operating costs and expenses were $19.7 million, or 35% of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. Operating costs and expenses for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 were $18.2 million, or 29% of net sales.

Operating Income. Operating income was $11.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, down from operating income of $18.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. Operating income was impacted by a decline in net sales, lower gross margin and higher operating expenses.

16

We evaluate segment performance based on net sales and operating income of each segment. Detailed below is operating income by reportable segment.

Operating income in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 for the Standard Semiconductor Products segment declined due to a 10% reduction in net sales and higher operating expenses. Operating income for the Rectifier, Assembly and Other Products segment declined in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 compared to the prior year, reflecting the impact of a 14% increase in sales that was more than offset by higher operating expenses.

Interest and Other Income, Net. Net interest and other income was income of $1.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. Net interest and other income in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 was income of $894,000.

Interest and other income includes interest income from investments and other items. The increase in net interest and other income in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 resulted mostly from higher absolute amounts of interest income due to higher investment balances and higher rates of return on investments.

Provision for Taxes. Provision for income taxes was $3.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, compared to $4.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. The effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 was 22% and for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 was 24%. The effective tax rate was lower in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 due the geographical mix of sales. There are several factors which can cause our effective tax rate to vary either higher or lower, including variations in income, the source of that income, exchange rates, the geographical sales mix and other factors.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We evaluate segment performance based on net sales and operating income of each segment. We do not track segment data or evaluate segment performance on additional financial information. As such, there are no separately identifiable segment assets and liabilities.

As of May 1, 2005, we had working capital of $243.4 million, compared with $221.4 million as of January 30, 2005. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities as of May 1, 2005 was 10.0 to 1, compared to 8.6 to 1 as of January 30, 2005. The increase in working capital as of May 1, 2005 was mostly the result of a $18.3 million increase in temporary investments.

The increase in temporary investments as of May 1, 2005 reflected our move to keep more investments in shorter-term maturities as opposed to longer-term maturities (classified as “Investments, maturities in excess of 1 year” on the consolidated condensed balance sheets) in anticipation of rising interest rates over the coming year.

Our combined amount of cash and cash equivalents, temporary investments and long-term investments was $303.4 million as of May 1, 2005, up from $301.9 million as of January 30, 2005. We have no long-term debt and only $5.0 million of long-term liabilities as of May 1, 2005. Our combined amount of cash and cash equivalents, temporary investments and long-term investments would generally be available for any corporate related capital or liquidity needs.

Operating Cash Flows. Cash provided by operating activities was $13.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, compared to cash provided by operating activities of $9.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. Net operating cash flows were impacted by non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization of $2.6 million and $2.2 million in the first quarters of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Operating cash flow in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 were positively impacted by net income of $10.8 million and by increases in deferred income taxes, tax benefit of stock option exercises, loss on the disposition of property, plant and equipment. These were partially offset by various changes in assets and liabilities, the largest being an increase in receivables, a decline in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and decline in other assets.

17

Operating cash flows in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 were $2.5 million higher than net income for the period, reflecting in part the add-back of $2.6 million of depreciation and amortization, $1.5 million of deferred income taxes and various changes in assets and liabilities, none of which were larger than $1.8 million.

Operating cash flow in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 included the payout of $6.0 million related to a customer settlement and $3.0 million related to year-end bonuses that were accrued in fiscal year 2004. First quarter of fiscal year 2005 operating cash flows were also meaningfully impacted by $2.2 million of tax benefit from stock option exercise and other changes in assets and liabilities.

Cash Flows Related to Investing Activities. Investing activities used $8.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 compared to $39.0 million used in the prior year period. Investing activities for both periods consist of changes in investments and cash used for capital expenditures. Included in the investing activities for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 was $218,000 of proceeds from the sale of assets. Additions to property, plant and equipment for the first quarters of fiscal years 2006 and 2005, which represent a use of cash for investing activities, were $5.6 million and $4.9 million, respectively. The combination of the purchase of available-for-sale investments and proceeds from sale and maturities of available-for-sale investments for both periods reflect the net purchase of additional investments in the amount of $2.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 and $34.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005.

Cash Flows Related to Financing Activities. Our financing activities used $6.0 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 and $421,000 in the prior year period. Financing activities for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 reflect $2.7 million of proceeds from stock option exercises and the reissuance of treasury stock, which together were more than offset by $8.7 million used to repurchase of treasury stock. Financing activities for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 reflect $2.7 million of proceeds from stock option exercises that was offset by $3.1 million cost of buybacks.

In order to develop, design and manufacture new products, we have incurred significant expenditures during the past five years. We expect to continue these investments aimed at developing new products, including the hiring of many design and applications engineers and related purchase of equipment. Our intent is to continue to invest in those areas that have shown potential for viable and profitable market opportunities. Certain of these expenditures, particularly the addition of design engineers, do not generate significant payback in the short-term. We plan to finance these expenditures with cash generated by operations and investments.

A portion of our capital resources, and the related liquidity they represent, are held by our foreign subsidiaries. If we needed these funds for investment in domestic operations, any repatriation could have negative tax implications.

Purchases of new capital equipment were made to expand our test capacity and support other engineering functions, including product design and qualification. These purchases were funded from our operating cash flows and cash reserves.

We believe that operating cash flows together with cash reserves are sufficient to fund operations and capital expenditures for the foreseeable future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements, or other relationships with unconsolidated subsidiaries or affiliated entities that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. We do not have any unconsolidated subsidiaries or affiliated entities. We have no special purpose or limited purpose entities that provide off-balance sheet financing, liquidity or market or credit risk support, engage in leasing, hedging, research and development services, or other relationships that expose us to liability that is not reflected on the face of our financial statements.

18

Inflation

Inflationary factors have not had a significant effect on our performance over the past several years. A significant increase in inflation would affect our future performance.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The pronouncement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years after November 23, 2004. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material effect on our financial condition, the results of operations or liquidity.

On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure under this provision is no longer an alternative.

The provisions of this statement are scheduled to become effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Assuming this new standard is implemented as scheduled, we plan to adopt this in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 that ends on April 30, 2006. We are currently evaluating the two methods of adoption allowed by SFAS No. 123(R): the modified-prospective transition method and the modified-retrospective transition method. The exact impact of adopting this pronouncement cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on many factors, including the levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted this pronouncement in prior periods, the impact of this pronouncement would approximate the impact of SFAS No. 123 described in the disclosure of the pro forma results in Note 1, under the heading “Stock-Based Compensation” in our Notes to Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

Available Information

General information about us can be found on our website at www.semtech.com. The information on our website is for information only and should not be relied on for investment purposes. The information on or website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K and should not be considered part of this or any other report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

We make available free of charge, either by direct access on our website or by a link to the SEC website, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Our reports filed with, or furnished to, the SEC are also available directly at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

19

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider and evaluate all of the information in this Form 10-Q, including the risk factors listed below. The risks described below are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks not now known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of these risks actually occur, our business could be materially harmed. If our business is harmed, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

This Form 10-Q also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, in our other filings with the SEC, and in material incorporated herein and therein by reference. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Economic decline may have adverse consequences for our business

We sell our products into several commercial markets, primarily the computer, communication and industrial end-markets, whose performance is tied to the overall economy. Many of these industries were severely impacted in calendar years 2001 and 2002 due to an economic slowdown in the United States and globally. Our business during these periods reflected the weak economic conditions. Market research analysts have claimed that historically the semiconductor industry is impacted by broad economic factors, such as United States gross domestic product (GDP) and worldwide oil prices.

If economic conditions were to once again worsen or a wider global slowdown were to occur, demand for our products may be reduced. In addition, economic slowdowns may also affect our customers’ ability to pay for our products. Accordingly, economic slowdowns may harm our business.

The cyclical nature of the electronics and semiconductor industries may limit our ability to maintain or increase revenue and profit levels during industry downturns

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and has experienced significant downturns, which are characterized by reduced product demand, production overcapacity, increased levels of inventory, industry-wide fluctuations in the demand for semiconductors and the significant erosion of average selling prices. The occurrence of these conditions has adversely affected our business in the past. In fiscal year 2002, our net sales declined by 26% compared to the prior year as a result of a dramatic slowdown in the industry. Past downturns in the semiconductor industry have resulted in a sudden impact on the semiconductor and capital equipment markets. Consequently, any future downturns in the semiconductor industry may harm our business.

We compete against larger, more established entities and our market share may be reduced if we are unable to respond to our competitors effectively

The semiconductor industry is intensely competitive and is characterized by price erosion, rapid technological change, and design and other technological obsolescence. We compete with domestic and international semiconductor companies, many of which have substantially greater financial and other resources with which to pursue engineering, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of their products. Some of these competitors include: Texas Instruments, National Semiconductor, Linear Technology, Maxim Integrated Products, Fairchild Semiconductor and Intersil Semiconductor, with respect to our power management products; ST Microelectronics N.V. and California Micro Devices, with respect to our protection products; Analog Devices and Maxim Integrated Products, with respect to our test and measurement products; Zarlink Semiconductor and Silicon Laboratories, with respect to our advanced communications products; and Alps Electric and Synaptics Inc., with respect to our HID products. We expect continued competition from existing competitors as well as competition from new entrants in the semiconductor market. Our ability to compete successfully in the rapidly evolving area of integrated circuit technology depends on several factors, including:

20

To the extent that our products achieve market success, competitors typically seek to offer competitive products or lower prices, which, if successful, could harm our business.

A majority of our net sales are into larger, vertical end-market applications. Fluctuations and seasonality and economic downturns in any of our end-markets may have adverse consequences for our business

A majority of our net sales are into larger, vertical end-market applications such as notebook computers, desktop computers and cellular phones. Vertical end-market applications tend to be highly cyclical over time and highly competitive given the significant unit opportunities they represent. Horizontal markets tend to be less cyclical, but unit volume opportunities are much lower. We consider the industrial market to be a horizontal end-market, because it is much more broad-based and comprised of many non-standardized end-applications.

Many of our products are used in personal computers and related peripherals. For our most recent fiscal year, fiscal year 2005 that ended January 30, 2005, we estimate that 32% of our sales were used in computer applications, including 21% tied to notebook computers. Industry-wide fluctuations in demand for desktop and notebook computers have in the past, and may in the future, harm our business. In addition, our past results have reflected some seasonality, with demand levels being higher in computer segments during the third and fourth quarters of the year in comparison to the first and second quarters.

For fiscal year 2005, shipment of our products to ATE customers represented approximately 10% of our net sales. However, in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, shipment of our products to ATE customers represented only 2% of our net sales. Products sold into the ATE end-market tend to have above average gross margin. Consequently, downturns in the ATE market and declines in the sales of our products used in ATE systems may adversely affect our business.

Since the middle of fiscal year 2004, we saw demand from cellular phone manufacturers increase, and we estimate 32% of our sales in fiscal year 2005 were tied to this end-market application. Any decline in the number of cellular phones made, especially feature-rich phones with color displays, could adversely affect our business.

We obtain many essential components and materials and certain critical manufacturing services from a limited number of suppliers and subcontractors, which are principally foreign-based entities

Our reliance on a limited number of outside subcontractors and suppliers for silicon wafers, packaging, test and certain other processes involves several risks, including a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components and reduced control over the price, timely delivery, reliability and quality of components. These risks may be attributable to several factors, including limitations on resources, labor problems, equipment failures or the occurrence of natural disasters. There can be no assurance that problems will not occur in the future with suppliers or subcontractors. Disruption or termination of our supply sources or subcontractors could significantly delay our shipments and harm our business. Delays could also damage relationships with current and prospective customers. Any prolonged inability to obtain timely deliveries or quality manufacturing or any other circumstances that would require us to seek alternative sources of supply or to manufacture or package certain components internally could limit our growth and harm our business.

Most of our outside subcontractors and suppliers, including third-party foundries that supply silicon wafers, are located in foreign countries, including China, Malaysia, Korea, the Philippines and Germany. For our most recent fiscal year, fiscal year 2005 that ended January 30, 2005, approximately 59% of our silicon in terms of finished wafers, was supplied by a third-party foundry in China, and this percentage could be even higher in future periods. While we do have some redundancy of fab processes by using multiple outside foundries, any interruption of supply by one or more of these foundries could materially impact us. Likewise, we maintain some amount of business

21

interruption insurance to help reduce the risk of wafer supply interruption, but we are not fully insured against such risk.

A majority of our package and test operations are performed by third-party contractors based in Malaysia, Korea, the Philippines and China. Our international business activities, in general, are subject to a variety of potential risks resulting from certain political and economic uncertainties. Any political turmoil or trade restrictions in these countries, particularly China, could limit our ability to obtain goods and services from these suppliers and subcontractors. The effect of an economic crisis or a political turmoil on our suppliers located in these countries may impact our ability to meet the demands of our customers. If we find it necessary to transition the goods and services received from our existing suppliers or subcontractors to other firms, we would likely experience an increase in production costs and a delay in production associated with such a transition, both of which could have a significant negative effect on our operating results, as these risks are substantially uninsured.

We may be unsuccessful in developing and selling new products required to maintain or expand our business

We operate in a dynamic environment characterized by price erosion, rapid technological change and design and other technological obsolescence. Our competitiveness and future success depend on our ability to achieve design wins for our products with current and future customers and introduce new or improved products that meet customer needs while achieving favorable margins. A failure to achieve design wins, to introduce these new products in a timely manner or to achieve market acceptance for these products could harm our business.

The introduction of new products presents significant business challenges because product development commitments and expenditures must be made well in advance of product sales. The success of a new product depends on accurate forecasts of long-term market demand and future technological developments, as well as on a variety of specific implementation factors, including:

The failure of our products to achieve market acceptance due to these or other factors could harm our business.

Our products may be found to be defective, product liability claims may be asserted against us and we may not have sufficient liability insurance

One or more of our products may be found to be defective after shipment, requiring a product replacement, recall, or a software solution that would cure the defect but impede performance of the product. We may also be subject to product returns which could impose substantial costs and harm our business.

Product liability claims may be asserted with respect to our technology or products. Our products are typically sold at prices that are significantly lower than the cost of the end-products into which they are incorporated. A defect or failure in our product could give rise to failures in our customers’ end-product, so we may face claims for damages that are disproportionately higher than the revenues and profits we receive from the products involved, especially if our customer seeks to recover for damage claims made against it by its own customers. While we maintain some insurance for such events, there can be no assurance that we have obtained a sufficient amount of insurance coverage, that asserted claims will be within the scope of coverage of the insurance, or that we will have sufficient resources to satisfy any asserted claims.

The costs associated with our general product warranty policy and our indemnification of certain customers, distributors, and other parties could be higher in future periods

Our general warranty policy provides for repair or replacement of defective parts. In some cases a refund of the purchase price is offered. In certain instances, we have agreed to other warranty terms, including some

22

indemnification provisions, that could prove to be significantly more costly than a refund of the purchase price. If there is a substantial increase in the rate of customer claims, if our estimate of probable losses relating to identified warranty exposures prove inaccurate, or if our efforts to contractually limit liability prove inadequate, we may record a charge against future cost of sales.

In the normal course of our business, we indemnify other parties, including customers, distributors, and lessors, with respect to certain matters. These obligations typically arise pursuant to contracts under which we agree to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations and covenants related to certain matters, such as acts or omissions of our employees, infringement of third-party intellectual property rights, and certain environmental matters. We have also entered into agreements with our directors and certain of our executives indemnifying them against certain liabilities incurred in connection with their duties, and our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws contain similar indemnification obligations with respect to our directors and employees. In some cases there are limits on and exceptions to our potential indemnification liability. We cannot estimate the amount of potential future payments, if any, that we might be required to make as a result of these agreements. Over at least the last decade, we have not incurred any significant expense as a result of agreements of this type. Accordingly, we have not accrued any amounts for such indemnification obligations. However, there can be no assurances that we will not incur expense under these indemnification provisions in the future.

Our share price could be subject to extreme price fluctuations, and shareholders could have difficulty trading shares

The market for the stock of high technology companies has been volatile, and the market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to significant fluctuations. Fluctuations could be in response to items such as operating results, announcements of technological innovations, or market conditions for technology stocks in general. Additionally, the stock market in recent years has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that often have been unrelated to the operating performance of individual companies. These market fluctuations, as well as general economic conditions, may adversely affect the price of our common stock.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against a company following periods of volatility in the company’s stock price. This type of litigation, if filed against us, could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources.

In addition, the future sale of a substantial number of shares of common stock by us or by our existing stockholders may have an adverse impact on the market price of the shares of common stock. There can be no assurance that the trading price of our common stock will remain at or near its current level.

We sell and trade with foreign customers, which subjects our business to increased risks applicable to international sales

Sales to foreign customers accounted for approximately 74% of net sales in the fiscal year ended January 30, 2005. Sales to our customers located in Taiwan and Korea constituted 25% and 28%, respectively, of net sales for fiscal year 2005. Sales to foreign customers accounted for approximately 82% of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006. International sales are subject to certain risks, including unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tariffs and other barriers, political and economic instability, difficulties in accounts receivable collection, difficulties in managing distributors and representatives, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary operations and potentially adverse tax consequences. These factors may harm our business. Our use of the Semtech name may be prohibited or restricted in some countries, which may negatively impact our sales efforts. In addition, substantially all of our foreign sales are denominated in U.S. dollars and currency exchange fluctuations in countries where we do business could harm us by resulting in pricing that is not competitive with prices denominated in local currencies.

The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) or other heath related issues, could impact our customer or supply base, especially in Asia

A large percentage of our sales are to customers located in Asia and a large percentage of our products are manufactured in Asia. One of our largest customer bases in Asia is located in Taiwan. Our largest wafer source is located in China. SARS or other health related issues could have a negative impact on consumer demand, on travel

23

needed to secure new business or manage our operations, on transportation of our products from our suppliers or to our customers, or on workers needed to manufacture our products or our customers’ products.

Our foreign currency exposures may change over time as the level of activity in foreign markets grows and could have an adverse impact upon financial results

As a global enterprise, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Certain of our assets, including certain bank accounts, exist in non U.S. dollar-denominated currencies, which are sensitive to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The non U.S. dollar-denominated currencies are principally the Euro, Swiss Francs, and British Pounds Sterling. We also have a significant number of employees that are paid in foreign currency, the largest being United Kingdom-based employees who are paid in British Pounds Sterling.

If the value of the U.S. dollar continues to weaken relative to these specific currencies, as it has done in recent years, the cost of doing business in terms of U.S. dollars goes up. With the growth of our international business, our foreign currency exposures may grow and under certain circumstances, could harm our business.

We do a limited amount of hedging of our foreign exchange exposure. In a limited number of cases, we have purchased forward contracts that lock in our right to purchase foreign currencies at an agreed upon rate. In other cases, we convert U.S. dollars into foreign currency in advance of the expected payment. The use of forward contracts to hedge foreign exchange exposure may be required to be marked-to-market each quarter and can create volatility in net income not directly tied to our operating results.

Our future results may fluctuate, fail to match past performance or fail to meet expectations

Our results may fluctuate in the future, may fail to match our past performance or fail to meet the expectations of analysts and investors. Our results and related ratios, such as gross margin, operating income percentage and effective tax rate may fluctuate as a result of:

As a result of these factors, our past financial results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.

24

We receive a significant portion of our revenues from a small number of customers and the loss of any one of these customers or failure to collect a receivable from them could adversely affect our operations and financial position

The identity of our largest customers has varied from year to year. Historically, we have had significant customers that individually accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenues in certain quarters or represented 10% or more of net accounts receivables at any given date. We had several end-customers in our most resent fiscal year which ended January 30, 2005 that accounted for more than 5% of net sales, but less than 10% of net sales. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, one of our end-customers that is a leading manufacturer of cellular phones accounted for approximately 11% of net sales.

Several of our authorized distributors have regularly accounted for more than 10% of net sales on an annual basis. Depending on the authorized distributor and their strategic focus, they can support anywhere from a few end-customers to many end-customers. For our most recent fiscal year, fiscal year 2005 that ended January 30, 2005, two of our Asian distributors accounted for approximately 11% and 10%, respectively, of net sales. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, two of our Asian distributors accounted for approximately 12% and 11% of net sales, respectively. As of May 1, 2005, these two Asian distributors accounted for approximately 14% and 10%, respectively, of our net accounts receivable. Sales to our customers are generally made on open account, subject to credit limits we may impose, and the receivables are subject to the risk of being uncollectible.

We primarily conduct our sales on a purchase order basis, rather than pursuant to long-term supply contracts. The loss of any significant customer, any material reduction in orders by any of our significant customers, the cancellation of a significant customer order or the cancellation or delay of a customer’s significant program or product could harm our business.

Most of our authorized distributors, which together represent nearly half of our net sales, can terminate their contract with us with little or no notice. The termination of a distributor could negatively impact our business, including net sales and accounts receivable

In our most recent fiscal year that ended January 30, 2005, authorized distributors accounted for approximately 51% of our net sales. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2006, authorized distributors accounted for approximately 58% of our net sales. We generally do not have long-term contracts with our distributors and most can terminate their agreement with us with little or no notice. For fiscal year 2005, our two largest distributors were based in Asia.

The termination of any distributor could impact our net sales and limit our access to certain end-customers. It could also result in the return of excess inventory of our product they hold as the distributor. Since many distributors simply resell finished products, they generally operate on very thin profit margins. If a distributor were to terminate their agreement with us or go out of business, our unsecured accounts receivable from them are subject to collection risk.

We have acquired and may continue to acquire other companies and may be unable to successfully integrate these companies into our operations

In the past, we have expanded our operations through strategic acquisitions, and we may continue to expand and diversify our operations with additional acquisitions. If we are unsuccessful in integrating these companies into our operations or if integration is more difficult than anticipated, then we may experience disruptions that could harm our business. Some of the risks that may affect our ability to integrate acquired companies include those associated with:

25

We must commit resources to product production prior to receipt of purchase commitments and could lose some or all of the associated investment

Sales are made primarily on a current delivery basis, pursuant to purchase orders that may be revised or cancelled by our customers without penalty, rather than pursuant to long-term supply contracts. Some contracts require that we maintain inventories of certain products at levels above the anticipated needs of our customers. As a result, we must commit resources to the production of products without binding purchase commitments from customers. Our inability to sell products after we devote significant resources to them could harm our business.

The loss of any of our key personnel or the failure to attract or retain the specialized technical and management personnel could impair our ability to grow our business

Our future success depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified technical, marketing and managerial personnel. We are dependent on a relatively small group of key technical personnel with analog and mixed-signal expertise. Personnel with highly skilled managerial capabilities, and analog and mixed-signal design expertise, are scarce and competition for personnel with these skills is intense. There can be no assurance that we will be able to retain key employees or that we will be successful in attracting, integrating or retaining other highly qualified personnel in the future. If we are unable to retain the services of key employees or are unsuccessful in attracting new highly qualified employees, our business could be harmed.

We are subject to government regulations and other standards that impose operational and reporting requirements

We and our suppliers are subject to a variety of United States federal, foreign, state and local governmental laws, rules and regulations, including those related to the use, storage, handling, discharge or disposal of certain toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous chemicals. If we or our suppliers were to incur substantial additional expenses to acquire equipment or otherwise comply with environmental regulations, product costs could significantly increase, thus harming our business. We are also subject to laws, rules, and regulations related to export licensing and customs requirements, including the North American Free Trade Agreement and State Department and Commerce Department rules.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 required us to change or supplement some of our corporate governance and securities disclosure and compliance practices. The SEC and Nasdaq have revised, and continue to revise, their regulations and listing standards. These developments have increased, and may continue to increase, our legal compliance and financial reporting costs. These developments also may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. This, in turn, could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, or qualified executive officers.

Failure to comply with present or future laws, rules and regulations of any kind that govern our business could result in suspension of all or a portion of production, cessation of all or a portion of operations, or the imposition of significant administrative, civil, or criminal penalties, any of which could harm our business.

Earthquakes or other natural disasters may cause us significant losses

Our corporate headquarters, a portion of our assembly and research and development activities and certain other critical business operations are located near major earthquake fault lines. We do not maintain earthquake insurance and could be harmed in the event of a major earthquake. We generally do not maintain flood coverage, including in our Asian locations were we have certain operations support and sales offices. Such flood coverage has become very expensive; as a result the Company has elected not to purchase this coverage. Our business could be harmed if natural disasters interfere with production of wafers by our suppliers, assembly and testing of products by our subcontractors, or our distribution network. We maintain some business interruption insurance to help reduce the effect of such business interruptions, but we are not fully insured against such risks. Likewise, our business could be adversely impacted if a natural disaster were to shut down or significantly curtail production at one or more of our end customers. Any such loss of revenue due to a slowdown or cessation of end customer demand is uninsured.

26

Terrorist attacks, war and other acts of violence may negatively affect our operations and your investment

Terrorist attacks, such as the attacks that took place on September 11, 2001, wars, such as the war in Iraq, and other acts of violence, such as those that may result from the increasing tension in the Middle East and the Korean peninsula, or any other national or international crisis, calamity or emergency, may result in interruption to the business activities of many entities, business losses and overall disruption of the U.S. economy at many levels. These events may directly impact our physical facilities or those of our customers and suppliers. Additionally, these events or armed conflicts may cause some of our customers or potential customers to reduce the level of expenditures on their services and products that ultimately may reduce our revenue. The consequences of these reductions are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on our business. For example, as a result of these events, insurance premiums for businesses may increase and the scope of coverage may be decreased. Consequently, we may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage for our business and properties. A “high” or “Orange” or “severe” or “Red” threat condition announced by the Homeland Security Advisory System or similar agency and any consequent effect on the transportation industry may adversely affect our ability to timely import materials from our suppliers located outside the United States or impact our ability to deliver our products to our customers without incurring significant delays. To the extent that these disruptions result in delays or cancellations of customer orders, a general decrease in corporate spending, or our inability to effectively market our services and products, our business and results of operations could be harmed.

We may be unable to adequately protect our intellectual property rights

We pursue patents for some of our new products and unique technologies, but we rely primarily on a combination of nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions, as well as our employees’ commitment to confidentiality and loyalty, to protect our know-how and processes. We intend to continue protecting our proprietary technology, including through trademark and copyright registrations and patents. Despite this intention, we may not be successful in achieving adequate protection. Our failure to adequately protect our material know-how and processes could harm our business. There can be no assurance that the steps we take will be adequate to protect our proprietary rights, that our patent applications will lead to issued patents, that others will not develop or patent similar or superior products or technologies, or that our patents will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented by others. Furthermore, the laws of the countries in which our products are or may be developed, manufactured or sold may not protect our products and intellectual property rights to the same extent as laws in the United States.

The semiconductor industry is characterized by frequent claims of infringement and litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. Due to the number of competitors, intellectual property infringement is an ongoing risk since other companies in our industry could have intellectual property rights that may not be identifiable when we initiate development efforts. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights and we may have to defend ourselves against infringement claims. Any such litigation could be very costly and may divert our management’s resources. If one of our products is found to infringe, we may have liability for past infringement and may need to seek a license going forward. If a license is not available or if we are unable to obtain a license on terms acceptable to us, we would either have to change our product so that it does not infringe or stop making the product.

We could be required to register as an investment company and become subject to substantial regulation that would interfere with our ability to conduct our business

The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires the registration of companies which are engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, or which are engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and which own or propose to acquire investment securities with a value of more than 40% of the company’s assets on an unconsolidated basis (other than U.S. government securities and cash). We are not engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, and we intend to invest our cash and cash equivalents in U.S. government securities to the extent necessary to take advantage of the 40% safe harbor. To manage our cash holdings, we invest in short-term instruments consistent with prudent cash management and the preservation of capital and not primarily for the purpose of achieving investment returns. U.S. government securities generally yield lower rates of income than other short-term instruments in which we have invested to date. Accordingly, investing substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents in U.S. government securities could result in lower levels of interest income and net income.

If we were deemed an investment company and were unable to rely upon a safe harbor or exemption under the Investment Company Act, we would among other things be prohibited from engaging in certain businesses or issuing

27

certain securities. Certain of our contracts might be voidable, and we could be subject to civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance.

We are subject to review by taxing authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service

We are subject to review by domestic and foreign taxing authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In fiscal year 2005, the IRS completed a routine review of our 1995 through 2001 tax filings. The final audit adjustments did not have a material impact on our financial statements. However, future audits by taxing authorities could impact us.

Changes in stock option accounting rules will impact our reported operating results prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and may impact our stock price and our competitiveness in the employee marketplace.

Technology companies like ours have a history of using broad based employee stock option programs to hire, incentivize and retain our workforce in a competitive marketplace. SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”) allows companies the choice of either using a fair value method of accounting for options, which would result in expense recognition for all options granted, or using an intrinsic value method, as prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB 25), with a pro forma disclosure of the impact on net income (loss) of using the fair value option expense recognition method. We have elected to apply APB 25 and accordingly we generally do not recognize any expense with respect to employee stock options as long as such options are granted at exercise prices equal to the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant.

On October 13, 2004, the FASB concluded that the Proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, Share-Based Payment, which would require all companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments (including stock options) at fair value, would be effective for public companies for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission amended the compliance date for this new standard to be the next fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. We could adopt the new standard in one of two ways – the modified prospective transition method or the modified retrospective transition method.

Assuming this new standard is implemented as scheduled, we will adopt this new standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2007. Should this proposed statement be finalized and implemented, it could have a significant impact on our consolidated statement of operations as we will be required to expense the fair value of our stock options rather than disclosing the impact on our consolidated result of operations within our footnotes in accordance with the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123. This will result in lower reported earnings per share, which could negatively impact our future stock price. In addition, this could impact our ability to utilize broad based employee stock plans to reward employees and could result in a competitive disadvantage to us in the employee marketplace.

Failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and an annual report by our independent registered public accounting firm addressing the assessment.

Management’s report for fiscal year 2005, and the required attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm, are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2005. Our controls and procedures are also discussed in Part I, Item 4 of this Form 10-Q.

If we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting. Effective internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important in the prevention of financial fraud. If we cannot produce reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and there could be a material adverse effect on our stock price.

28

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the information in this Form 10-Q and in the documents that are incorporated by reference, including the risk factors in this section, contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical information or statements of current condition and relate to matters such as our future financial performance, future operational performance, and our plans, objectives and expectations. Some forward-looking statements may be identified by use of terms such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “believes”, “projects”, “should”, “will”, “plans” and similar words. In light of the risks and uncertainties inherent in all such projected matters, forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved or that any of our operating expectations or financial forecasts will be realized. Financial results could differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

We are subject to a variety of market risks, such as the foreign exchange and interest rate risks that are detailed below. Many of the factors that can impact on our market risk are external to the company, and so we are unable to fully predict them.

Foreign Currency Risk

As a global enterprise, we face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates and we could experience currency gains or losses. Because of the relatively small size of each individual currency exposure, we generally do not use forward contracts to mitigate foreign currency exposures. Our foreign currency exposures may change over time as the level of activity in foreign markets grows and could have an adverse impact upon our financial results.

Certain of our assets, including certain bank accounts and accounts receivable, exist in non U.S. dollar-denominated currencies, which are sensitive to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The non U.S. dollar-denominated currencies are principally the Euro, Swiss Francs and British Pounds Sterling. Additionally, certain of our current and long-term liabilities are denominated principally in British Pounds Sterling currency, which is also sensitive to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Substantially all of our foreign sales are denominated in United States dollars. Currency exchange fluctuations in countries where we do business could harm our business by resulting in pricing that is not competitive with prices denominated in local currencies.

Interest Rate and Market Risk

As of May 1, 2005, we had no long-term debt outstanding. We do not currently hedge any potential interest rate exposure.

Interest rates affect our return on excess cash and investments. As of May 1, 2005, we had $81.0 million of cash and cash equivalents and $222.5 million of temporary and long-term investments. A majority of our cash and cash equivalents and investments generate interest income based on prevailing interest rates. A significant change in interest rates would impact the amount of interest income generated from our excess cash and investments. It would also impact the market value of our investments.

Our investments are subject to market risk, primarily interest rate and credit risk. Our investments are managed by a limited number of outside professional managers within investment guidelines set by us. Such guidelines include

29

security type, credit quality and maturity and are intended to limit market risk by restricting our investments to high quality debt instruments with relatively short-term maturities.

We carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

During the most recently completed fiscal quarter, there has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

We periodically become subject to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings that we believe will materially and adversely affect our business.

On June 22, 2001, we were notified by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (“State”) that we may have liability associated with the clean-up of the one-third acre Davis Chemical Company site in Los Angeles, California. We have been included in the clean-up program because we are one of the companies that used the Davis Chemical Company site for waste recycling and/or disposal between 1949 and 1990. We have joined with other potentially responsible parties in an effort to resolve this matter with the State. The group has entered into a Consent Order with the State that requires the group to perform a soils investigation at the site and submit a draft remediation plan. The group has submitted various reports to the State for review, including the results of limited groundwater sampling. The State has the right to require the removal of contaminated soils and to expand the scope of work to include further investigation of groundwater contamination. The Consent Order does not require the group to remediate the site. To date, our share of the group’s expenses has not been material and has been expensed. At this time there is not a specific proposal or budget with respect to additional studies or the clean-up of the site. Thus, we cannot reasonably determine the potential additional amount of costs, if any, associated with this matter and, accordingly, we have not established a reserve for this matter.

30

This table provides information with respect to purchases by the Company of shares of common stock during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

We believe that all information that was required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 was reported on a Form 8-K during that period.

As permitted by applicable SEC rules, the Company has elected to include the following information in this Form 10-Q in lieu of filing a separate Form 8-K:

The Company and Chief Operating Officer Anthony E. Giraudo have mutually agreed to the elimination of the Chief Operating Officer position effective June 10, 2005 and Mr. Giraudo’s departure from the Company in conjunction therewith. A summary of Mr. Giraudo’s compensation was included in Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2005.

The Company had no special arrangements with Mr. Giraudo regarding severance or other payments to be made upon, or due to, termination of his employment. The Company generally conditions the payment of severance benefits upon receipt of a release of claims. Mr. Giraudo has executed the release attached hereto as Exhibit 10.1. If he does not revoke the release within the period set forth therein, he will receive base salary and health insurance continuation for thirteen weeks. His termination date would be postponed from June 10, 2005 until the end of the thirteen-week continuation period, although he would not transact any Company business during that time. Vacation accruals and other standard benefits would be provided during the continuation period. Vesting in the Semtech Executive Compensation Plan, but not stock option vesting, would continue during the continuation period.

31

32

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

33