UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 2, 2005
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File number 0-6080
DELHAIZE AMERICA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NORTH CAROLINA | 56-0660192 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
P.O. Box 1330, 2110 Executive Drive, Salisbury, NC 28145-1330
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)
(704) 633-8250
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ¨ No x
Outstanding shares of common stock of the Registrant as of May 17, 2005.
Class A Common Stock | 91,270,348,481 | |
Class B Common Stock | 75,468,935 |
THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) and (b) OF
FORM 10-Q AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
April 2, 2005
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Delhaize America, the Company, we, us and our refer to Delhaize America, Inc., a North Carolina corporation together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
2
CAUTIONARY NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes or incorporates by reference forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act), Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 about Delhaize America that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, other than statements of historical fact, which address activities, events or developments that Delhaize America expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, statements regarding expansion and growth of its business, anticipated store openings and renovations, future capital expenditures, projected revenue growth or synergies resulting from the share exchange transaction with Delhaize Group, and business strategy, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified as statements that include phrases such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, foresee, likely, will, should or other similar words or phrases.
Although we believe that these statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our goals will be achieved. Given these uncertainties, prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date this quarterly report on Form 10-Q is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update or revise them. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, without limitation:
| The grocery retailing industry continues to experience significant competition from other food retailers, supercenters, mass merchandisers, club or warehouse stores, drug stores and restaurants. Our continued success is dependent upon our ability to compete in this industry, develop and implement retailing strategies and continue to reduce operating expenses. The competitive environment may cause us to reduce our prices in order to gain or maintain share of sales, thus reducing margins. While we believe our opportunities for sustained, profitable growth are considerable, unanticipated actions of competitors could impact our sales and net income. |
| Our future results could be adversely affected due to pricing and promotional activities of existing and new competitors, including non-traditional food retailers; our response actions; the state of the economy, including inflationary or deflationary trends in certain commodities; recessionary times in the economy; and our ability to sustain the cost reductions that we have identified and implemented. |
| Our ability to achieve our cost savings goals could be affected by, in addition to other factors described herein, our ability to achieve productivity improvements, shrink reduction, efficiencies in our distribution centers, and other efficiencies created by our logistics projects. |
| Changes in the general business and economic conditions in our operating regions, including the rate of inflation, population growth, and employment and job growth in the markets in which we operate may affect our ability to hire and train qualified employees to operate our stores. This could negatively affect earnings and sales growth. General economic changes may also affect the shopping habits of our customers, which could affect sales and earnings. |
| Consolidation in the food industry is likely to continue and the effects on our business, favorable or unfavorable, cannot be foreseen. |
| Our ability to integrate any companies we acquire or have acquired and achieve operating improvements at those companies may affect our financial results. |
| Increases in the cost of inputs, such as utility costs, fuel costs or raw material costs and increased product costs, and increased labor and labor related (e.g., health and welfare and pension) costs could negatively impact our results. |
| Adverse weather conditions could increase the cost our suppliers charge for their products, decrease or increase the customer demand for certain products, interrupt operations at affected stores, or interrupt operations of our suppliers. |
| We are subject to labor relations issues, including union organizing activities that could result in an increase in costs or lead to a strike, thus impairing operations and decreasing sales. We are also subject to labor relations issues at entities involved in our supply chain, including both suppliers and those involved in transportation and shipping. |
| Changes in laws and regulations, including changes in accounting standards, taxation requirements, and environmental laws may have a material impact on our financial statements. |
| Our future results could be adversely affected by issues affecting the food distribution and retail industry generally, such as food safety concerns, an increase in consumers eating away from home and the manner in which vendors target their promotional dollars. |
3
| Our comparable store sales growth could be affected by competitors openings. |
| We have estimated our exposure to the claims and litigation arising in the normal course of business and believe we have made adequate provisions for them. Unexpected outcomes in these matters could result in an adverse effect on our financial statements. |
| We continue to experience both federal and state audits of income tax filings, which we consider to be part of our ongoing business activity. While the ultimate outcome of these federal and state audits is not certain, we have considered the merits of our defenses in our overall evaluation of potential tax liabilities and believe we have adequate liabilities recorded in our consolidated financial statements for potential exposures on these matters. Unexpected outcomes in these matters could result in an adverse effect on our financial statements. |
| Interest expense on variable rate borrowings will vary with changes in capital markets and the amount of debt that we have outstanding. However, the majority of our long-term notes payable bear an effective fixed interest rate. On this debt, we bear the risk that the required payments will exceed those based on current market rates. |
| Our capital expenditures could differ from our estimate if we are unsuccessful in acquiring suitable sites for new stores, if development costs vary from those budgeted, or if significant projects are not completed in the time frame expected or on budget. |
| Depreciation and amortization expenses may vary from our estimates due to the timing of new store openings and remodels. |
| LIFO charges and credits will be affected by changes in the cost of inventory. |
| We are self-insured for workers compensation, general liability and auto claims. Maximum retention, including defense costs per occurrence, ranges from (i) $0.5 million to $1.0 million per accident for workers compensation, (ii) $5.0 million per accident for automobile liability and (iii) $3.0 million per accident for general liability, with an additional $5.0 million retention in excess of the primary $3.0 million general liability retention for druggist liability. We are insured for costs related to covered claims, including defense costs, in excess of these retentions. It is possible that the final resolution of some of these claims may require us to make significant expenditures in excess of our existing reserves over an extended period of time and in a range of amounts that cannot be reasonably estimated. Pursuant to our self-insurance program, self-insured reserves related to workers compensation, general liability and auto coverage are reinsured by Pride Reinsurance Company (Pride), an Irish reinsurance captive, owned by an affiliated company of Delhaize Group. Premiums are transferred annually to Pride through Delhaize Insurance Co., a subsidiary of Delhaize America. |
| Our access to capital markets on favorable terms and our leasing costs could be negatively affected by our financial performance and by conditions of the financial markets. |
Other factors and assumptions not identified above could also cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking information. Accordingly, actual events and results may vary significantly from those included in or contemplated or implied by forward-looking statements made by us or our representatives.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
For the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
13 Weeks Ended April 2, 2005 |
13 Weeks Ended April 3, 2004 | |||||
Net sales and other revenues |
$ | 4,026,735 | $ | 3,853,639 | ||
Cost of goods sold |
2,967,145 | 2,856,673 | ||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
854,088 | 788,524 | ||||
Operating income |
205,502 | 208,442 | ||||
Interest expense |
80,871 | 80,052 | ||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
124,631 | 128,390 | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
52,892 | 51,067 | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
71,739 | 77,323 | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
2,193 | 53,725 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 69,546 | $ | 23,598 | ||
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of April 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
April 2, 2005 |
January 1, 2005 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 576,222 | $ | 499,865 | ||||
Receivables, net |
113,598 | 120,988 | ||||||
Receivable from affiliate |
12,647 | 17,436 | ||||||
Inventories |
1,152,182 | 1,144,904 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
96,461 | 49,924 | ||||||
Other assets |
13,220 | 13,472 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,964,330 | 1,846,589 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
2,995,401 | 2,986,803 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,049,459 | 3,049,622 | ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
723,559 | 733,194 | ||||||
Reinsurance recoverable from affiliate |
140,115 | 136,845 | ||||||
Other assets |
166,709 | 175,219 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 9,039,573 | $ | 8,928,272 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 717,731 | $ | 735,305 | ||||
Dividend payable |
| 25,029 | ||||||
Payable to affiliate |
| 925 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
349,910 | 295,137 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations - current |
41,288 | 40,639 | ||||||
Long term debt - current |
12,252 | 12,295 | ||||||
Other liabilities - current |
33,999 | 40,596 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,157 | 3,349 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
102,901 | 51,459 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
1,259,238 | 1,204,734 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
2,855,339 | 2,866,228 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations |
731,970 | 722,113 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
242,589 | 250,323 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
313,456 | 315,824 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
5,402,592 | 5,359,222 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Class A non-voting common stock |
163,076 | 163,076 | ||||||
Class B voting common stock |
37,736 | 37,736 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
(53,930 | ) | (55,234 | ) | ||||
Additional paid-in capital |
2,499,614 | 2,491,560 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
990,485 | 931,912 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
3,636,981 | 3,569,050 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 9,039,573 | $ | 8,928,272 | ||||
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
13 Weeks Ended April 2, 2005 |
13 Weeks Ended April 3, 2004 |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 69,546 | $ | 23,598 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for loss on disposal of discontinued operations |
| 72,842 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
118,610 | 116,091 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization - discontinued operations |
| 890 | ||||||
Amortization of debt fees/costs |
487 | 498 | ||||||
Amortization of debt premium |
386 | 383 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred loss on derivative |
2,090 | 2,111 | ||||||
Amortization and termination of restricted shares |
1,070 | 948 | ||||||
Transfer from escrow to fund interest, net of accretion |
656 | (490 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest on interest rate swap |
(1,351 | ) | (3,306 | ) | ||||
Net loss (gain) on disposals of property and capital lease terminations |
955 | (743 | ) | |||||
Stock compensation expense |
4,734 | | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
(10,720 | ) | 1,102 | |||||
Other |
10 | 13 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash: |
||||||||
Receivables |
7,390 | (4,965 | ) | |||||
Net receivable from affiliate |
3,864 | 1,484 | ||||||
Inventories |
(7,278 | ) | 56,256 | |||||
Prepaid expenses |
(46,537 | ) | (41,949 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
607 | 1,470 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
(17,614 | ) | (33,373 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses |
54,774 | 32,712 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
55,288 | 16,330 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits related to stock options |
(3,683 | ) | | |||||
Other liabilities |
(12,235 | ) | (4,448 | ) | ||||
Total adjustments |
151,503 | 213,856 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
221,049 | 237,454 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(101,666 | ) | (58,263 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property |
2,329 | 4,692 | ||||||
Other investment activity |
(279 | ) | (2,513 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(99,616 | ) | (56,084 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(5,876 | ) | (2,318 | ) | ||||
Principal payments under capital lease obligations |
(11,082 | ) | (8,488 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(25,029 | ) | | |||||
Transfer from escrow to fund long-term debt |
5,636 | 2,808 | ||||||
Parent common stock repurchased |
(14,878 | ) | (4,999 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
2,470 | 1,024 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits related to stock options |
3,683 | | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(45,076 | ) | (11,973 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
76,357 | 169,397 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
499,865 | 313,629 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 576,222 | $ | 483,026 | ||||
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1) Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements for Form 10-Q and, consequently, do not include all the disclosures normally required by generally accepted accounting principles or those normally made in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Delhaize America, Inc. (Delhaize America or the Company). Accordingly, the reader of this Form 10-Q should refer to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2005 for further information. Reclassifications and restatements for discontinued operations have been made for all current and historical information presented herein from that contained in the Companys prior SEC filings on Forms 10-Q and 10-K.
The financial information presented herein has been prepared in accordance with the Companys customary accounting practices. In the opinion of management, the financial information includes all adjustments, including normal recurring items, necessary for a fair presentation of interim results.
2) Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Selected cash payments and non-cash activities during the period were as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
13 Weeks Ended April 2, 2005 |
13 Weeks Ended April 3, 2004 | ||||
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds |
$ | 6,997 | $ | 2,893 | ||
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
20,458 | 23,284 | ||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||
Capitalized lease obligations incurred for store properties and equipment |
22,312 | 3,300 | ||||
Capitalized lease obligations terminated for store properties and equipment |
726 | | ||||
Change in reinsurance recoverable and other liabilities |
3,270 | 2,921 | ||||
Reduction of income taxes payable and goodwill for tax adjustments |
163 | 937 |
3) Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Inventories valued using the Last-in, First-out (LIFO) method comprised approximately 76% of inventories both on April 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005, respectively. Meat, produce, deli-bakery and seafood inventories are valued on the average cost method rather than the LIFO method. If the Company did not report under the LIFO method, inventories would have been $43.4 million and $40.2 million greater as of April 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005, respectively. Application of the LIFO method resulted in increases in cost of goods sold of $3.2 million and $1.3 million for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004, respectively. The Company evaluates inventory shrinkage throughout the year based on actual physical counts in its stores and distribution centers and records adjustments based on the results of these counts to provide for the estimated shrinkage as of the balance sheet date.
4) Supplier Allowances
The Company receives allowances, credits and income from suppliers primarily for volume incentives, new product introductions, in-store promotions and co-operative advertising. Volume incentives are based on contractual arrangements generally covering a period of one year or less and have been included in the cost of inventory and recognized as earned in cost of sales when the product is sold. New product introduction allowances compensate the Company for costs incurred associated with product handling and have been deferred and recognized as a reduction in cost of sales over the product introductory period. Non-refundable credits from suppliers for in-store promotions such as product displays require related activities by the Company. Similarly, co-operative advertising requires the Company to conduct the related advertising. In-store promotion and co-operative advertising income is recorded as a reduction in the cost of inventory and recognized in cost of sales when the product is sold unless the allowance represents the reimbursement of a specific, incremental and identifiable cost incurred by the Company to sell the vendors product. The Company has reviewed the funding received from vendors for in-store promotions and co-operative advertising and concluded that these arrangements are primarily for general advertising purposes and not the reimbursement of a specific, incremental and identifiable cost incurred by the Company.
8
Total supplier allowances recognized for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004, are shown below:
(Dollars in thousands) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 | ||||
Allowances credited to cost of inventory |
$ | 27,004 | $ | 25,010 | ||
Other allowances |
36,106 | 37,297 | ||||
Total supplier allowances |
$ | 63,110 | $ | 62,307 | ||
5) Reclassification
Certain financial statement items previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the current periods presentation.
6) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company participates in a stock option plan of its parent company, the Delhaize Group 2002 stock incentive plan (the Delhaize Group Plan), under which incentive stock options to purchase Delhaize Group American Depository Shares (ADSs) may be granted to officers and key employees at prices equal to fair market value on the date of the grant. Options become exercisable as determined by the Board of Directors of Delhaize Group on the date of grant, provided that no option may be exercised more than ten years after the date of grant. Under the Delhaize Group Plan, the exercise of options by an optionee results in the issuance of new Delhaize Group ordinary shares through a capital increase of the Companys parent, Delhaize Group. In connection with the exercise of an option, the optionee pays the exercise price to Delhaize Group. Additionally, the Company pays Delhaize Group an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price of the option and the fair market value of the ADSs on the date of exercise, which totaled $9.4 million for the quarter ended April 2, 2005.
Additionally, there are still options to purchase Delhaize Group ADSs outstanding under a 1996 Food Lion Plan, 1988 and 1998 Hannaford Plans and a 2000 Delhaize America Plan (collectively, the Prior Plans); however, the Company can no longer grant options under these plans. The terms and conditions of these plans are substantially consistent with the current Delhaize Group Plan. During the quarter ended April 2, 2005, the Company acquired 71,842 ADSs to support the exercise of options under the Prior Plans for $5.2 million.
The Company also has restricted stock (Delhaize Group restricted ADSs) awards and restricted stock unit awards outstanding for executive employees. Restricted stock unit awards represent the right to receive the number of ADSs set forth in the award at the vesting date. Unlike awards of restricted stock, no ADSs are issued with respect to these awards until the applicable vesting dates. In May 2002, the Company ceased granting restricted stock awards and began granting restricted stock unit awards under its 2002 Restricted Stock Unit Award Plan. The Company plans to repurchase ADSs on the open market to support vesting of awards under the 2002 Restricted Stock Unit Award Plan.
On January 2, 2005, the Company early adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (Statement 123R), requiring the Company to recognize expense related to the fair value of its employee share-based awards. The Company will recognize the cost of all share-based awards on a graded method over the vesting period of the awards prospectively beginning with fiscal year 2005 stock compensation grants. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R, total stock option expense totaled $4.7 million ($4.4 million, net of tax) for the quarter ended April 2, 2005. The Company recorded compensation expense related to restricted stock expense of $1.1 million ($.7 million, net of tax) and $.9 million ($.5 million, net of tax) for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004, respectively.
Prior to January 2, 2005, the Company accounted for the Delhaize Group Plan under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and Related Interpretations. No compensation cost was recognized in the income statement for stock options prior to fiscal year 2005, as all options granted under the Delhaize Group Plan have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying Delhaize Group ADSs on the date of grant. Historically, for purposes of the disclosures required by the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, the straight-line method was used to allocate the option valuation amounts evenly over their respective vesting schedules. The Company elected to apply the revised standard using the modified prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized in fiscal year 2005 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 2, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 2, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R. The Company is not required to restate financial statements for any prior interim and fiscal years.
In accordance with FAS 123R, the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits that relate to tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) have been classified as financing cash flows. This excess tax benefit for the first quarter of 2005 was $3.7 million (see cash flow for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005).
9
The following table illustrates the effect on net income if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation:
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 |
|||||||
Net earnings - as reported |
$ | 69,546 | $ | 23,598 | ||||
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined using fair value based method (net of tax) |
1,346 | * | (2,904 | ) | ||||
Net earnings - pro forma |
$ | 70,892 | $ | 20,694 | ||||
* | Represents the pro-forma tax benefit associated with disqualifying dispositions of qualified stock options during the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005. |
The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which is consistent with the Companys valuation techniques previously utilized for options in disclosures required under SFAS No.123. The weighted average fair value at date of grant for options granted under the Delhaize Group Plan during the first quarter of 2005 and 2004 was $18.59 and $10.65 per option, respectively. The fair value of options at date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes model based on the following assumptions:
13 Weeks Ended April 2, 2005 |
13 Weeks Ended April 3, 2004 | |||
Expected dividend yield(%) |
2.6 | 3.6 | ||
Expected volatility (%) |
37.5 | 41.0 | ||
Risk-free interest rate(%) |
4.0 | 3.1 | ||
Expected term (years) |
4.5 | 5.4 |
The expected dividend yield is calculated by dividing the Delhaize Group annual dividend by the share price at the date of grant for options; expected volatility represents a five year historical volatility; the risk-free rate is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option; and the expected term is based on a ten year historical pattern.
The following table summarizes the stock option transactions for the quarter ended April 2, 2005:
Options |
Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term |
Aggregate Value | |||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2005 |
5,424,181 | $ | 41.15 | ||||||||
Granted |
3,125 | 70.47 | |||||||||
Exercised |
(345,119 | ) | 41.84 | ||||||||
Forfeited/expired |
(77,086 | ) | 42.96 | ||||||||
Outstanding at April 2, 2005 |
5,005,101 | $ | 41.08 | 7.5 | $ | 135,164,034 | |||||
Options exercisable at April 2, 2005 |
1,700,458 | $ | 42.80 | 5.7 | $ | 43,408,103 |
The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised during the first quarters ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004 was $10.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively.
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested option shares as of April 2, 2005, and changes during the quarter ended April 2, 2005, is presented below:
Nonvested options |
Shares |
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | ||||
Nonvested at January 1, 2005 |
3,460,903 | $ | 12.76 | |||
Granted |
3,125 | 18.59 | ||||
Vested |
(82,236 | ) | 33.27 | |||
Forfeited |
(77,149 | ) | 13.99 | |||
Nonvested at April 2, 2005 |
3,304,643 | $ | 12.74 | |||
10
As of April 2, 2005, there was $22.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested option shares that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
The following table summarizes the restricted share and restricted unit transactions for the quarter ended April 2, 2005:
Shares and Units Outstanding |
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value | |||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2005 |
501,072 | $ | 38.73 | |||
Released in Q1 2005 |
(27,761 | ) | 42.75 | |||
Outstanding at April 2, 2005 |
473,311 | $ | 38.49 | |||
As of April 2, 2005, there was $11.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted share and restricted unit compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.4 years.
7) Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company maintains interest rate swaps against certain debt obligations, effectively converting a portion of the debt from fixed to variable rates. The notional principal amounts of interest rate swap arrangements as of April 2, 2005 were $300 million maturing in 2006 and $100 million maturing in 2011. Maturity dates of interest rate swap arrangements match those of the underlying debt. These agreements involve the exchange of fixed rate payments for variable rate payments without the exchange of the underlying principal amounts. Variable rates for the Companys agreements are based on six-month or three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR and are reset on a semiannual basis or a quarterly basis. The differential between fixed and variable rates to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change in accordance with the agreements and recognized over the life of the agreements as an adjustment to interest expense. The $100 million notional swaps maturing in 2011 meet the criteria for using the short-cut method, which assumes 100% hedge effectiveness, as prescribed by SFAS No. 133 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. During the fourth quarter of 2004, in association with the retirement of $36.536 million of its $600 million 7.375% notes, the Company de-designated the $300 million notional interest rate swaps as a fair value hedge of 50% of the $600 million 2006 notes, and re-designated them as fair value hedge of approximately 53% of the remaining $563.5 million 2006 notes. These swaps meet the criteria of being highly effective swaps, as prescribed by SFAS No. 133, and currently carry no significant ineffectiveness. The Company recorded a derivative asset in connection with all these agreements in the amount of $4.2 million and $8.3 million at April 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005, respectively, which is included in its Consolidated Balance Sheet in Non-current Other Assets.
In fiscal 2001, the Company settled certain interest rate hedge agreements in connection with the completion of an offering of notes, resulting in an unrealized loss of approximately $214 million. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 133 at the beginning of fiscal 2001, the unrealized loss was recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, and is being amortized to Interest expense over the term of the associated notes. The unrealized loss was reduced as of the date of the Delhaize Group share exchange as a result of the application of purchase accounting. The remaining unrealized loss, net of taxes, at April 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005 was $37.6 million and $38.9 million, respectively.
8) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are comprised of the following:
(Dollars in thousands) |
April 2, 2005 |
Fiscal 2004 | ||||
Goodwill |
$ | 3,049,459 | $ | 3,049,622 | ||
Trademarks |
476,923 | 476,923 | ||||
Favorable lease rights |
357,433 | 357,487 | ||||
Prescription files |
18,626 | 18,626 | ||||
Liquor license |
3,811 | 3,609 | ||||
Other |
29,125 | 28,195 | ||||
3,935,377 | 3,934,462 | |||||
Less accumulated amortization |
162,359 | 151,646 | ||||
$ | 3,773,018 | $ | 3,782,816 | |||
Amortization expense totaled $11.0 million for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 and $10.1 million for the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2004.
11
The following represents a summary of changes in goodwill for periods presented:
(Dollars in thousands) |
April 2, 2005 |
Fiscal 2004 |
||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 3,049,622 | $ | 2,895,541 | ||||
Acquisitions and purchase price Adjustments |
| 162,868 | ||||||
Reduction of goodwill for tax adjustments |
(163 | ) | (8,787 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 3,049,459 | $ | 3,049,622 | ||||
The Companys policy requires that an annual impairment assessment for goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets be conducted in the fourth quarter of each year or when events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred in accordance with SFAS No. 142. The Company had no impairment loss for fiscal 2004.
The carrying amount of goodwill and trademarks (indefinite lived intangible assets) at each of the Companys reporting units follows:
April 2, 2005 |
April, 2, 2005 |
Fiscal 2004 |
Fiscal 2004 | |||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
Goodwill |
Trademarks |
Goodwill |
Trademarks | ||||||||
Food Lion |
$ | 1,135 | $ | 249 | $ | 1,135 | $ | 249 | ||||
Hannaford |
1,911 | 223 | 1,911 | 223 | ||||||||
Harveys |
4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||
$ | 3,050 | $ | 477 | $ | 3,050 | $ | 477 | |||||
As of April 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005, the Companys intangible assets with finite lives consist of favorable lease rights, liquor licenses, pharmacy files and developed software. The components of its intangible assets with finite lives are as follows:
April 2, 2005 |
Fiscal 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
Gross Carrying Value |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net |
Gross Carrying Value |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | ||||||||||||||
Favorable lease rights |
$ | 357 | $ | (143 | ) | $ | 214 | $ | 357 | $ | (135 | ) | $ | 222 | ||||||
Other |
52 | (19 | ) | 33 | 50 | (16 | ) | 34 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 409 | $ | (162 | ) | $ | 247 | $ | 407 | $ | (151 | ) | $ | 256 | ||||||
Estimated amortization expense as of January 1, 2005 for intangible assets with finite lives for the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
(Dollars in millions) | |||
2005 |
$ | 37.8 | |
2006 |
35.6 | ||
2007 |
30.3 | ||
2008 |
24.0 | ||
2009 |
19.3 |
9) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net earnings and other comprehensive earnings (losses). Other comprehensive earnings (losses) include items that are currently excluded from the Companys net income (loss) and recorded directly to shareholders equity. Included in other comprehensive income (loss) are unrealized losses on hedges, minimum pension liability adjustments and unrealized security holding gains. Comprehensive income was $70.9 million and $24.9 million for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004, respectively.
10) Discontinued Operations
The Company classifies operations as discontinued if (i) the operations and cash flows have been eliminated from ongoing operations, (ii) there is no significant continuing involvement, and (iii) a re-location within the vicinity has not occurred.
During the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005, the Company did not close any underperforming stores. To date the Company has closed 83 underperforming stores classified as discontinued operations of which 39 closed during fiscal 2004 and 44 closed during fiscal 2003. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, a portion of the costs associated with the closure of these stores, as well as related operating activity prior to closing for these stores, was recorded in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
12
Operating activity prior to closing for the discontinued stores is shown below:
(Dollars in thousands) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 |
||||||
Net sales and other revenues |
$ | | $ | 26,737 | ||||
Net loss |
$ | (119 | ) | $ | (5,565 | ) |
During the first quarter of 2004 in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, the Company recorded a $72.8 million loss to discontinued operations ($46.4 million after taxes) for the 35 underperforming stores closed. The loss included an initial reserve of $53.5 million for rent, real estate taxes, common area maintenance expenses (other liabilities) and $1.9 million for severance and outplacement costs (accrued expenses). The remaining loss included property retirement (asset impairment) of $22.1 million net of gains on capital lease retirements of $4.7 million.
Additional discontinued operations expenses not reserved totaled $2.1 million and $1.8 million after taxes for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 and April 3, 2004, respectively.
The following table shows the reserve balances for discontinued operations as of April 2, 2005:
(Dollars in thousands) |
Other Liabilities |
Accrued Expenses |
Total |
||||||||
Reserve balance as of January 1, 2005 |
$ | (55,743 | ) | $ | | $ | (55,743 | ) | |||
Utilizations |
11,520 | | 11,520 | ||||||||
Reserve balance as of April 2, 2005 |
$ | (44,223 | ) | $ | | $ | (44,223 | ) | |||
11) Store Closings
The following table shows the number of stores closed at the end of the first quarter of 2005:
Discontinued Operations |
Closed |
Total |
|||||||
As of January 1, 2005 |
57 | 152 | 209 | ||||||
Store closings added |
| 2 | 2 | ||||||
Stores sold/lease terminated |
(5 | ) | (6 | ) | (11 | ) | |||
As of April 2, 2005 |
52 | 148 | 200 |
The following table reflects closed store liabilities as of April 2, 2005 and activity during the quarter, including additions to closed store liabilities charged to operations or discontinued operations and adjustments to liabilities based on changes in facts and circumstances and payments made:
Qtr 1 2005 |
Qtr 1 2005 Closed |
Qtr 1 2005 Total |
||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2005 |
$ | 55.7 | $ | 93.3 | $ | 149.0 | ||||||
Additions: |
||||||||||||
Store closings - lease obligations |
0.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | |||||||||
Store closing - other exit costs |
0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||||
Total additions |
0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||
Adjustments to estimates-lease obligation |
0.7 | (0.1 | ) | 0.6 | ||||||||
Adjustments to estimates-other exit costs |
0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | |||||||||
Total adjustments |
0.8 | (0.1 | ) | 0.7 | ||||||||
Reductions: |
||||||||||||
Lease/termination payments made |
(11.6 | ) | (3.1 | ) | (14.7 | ) | ||||||
Payments for other exit costs |
(0.7 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||
Total reductions |
(12.3 | ) | (3.6 | ) | (15.9 | ) | ||||||
Balance at April 2, 2005 |
$ | 44.2 | $ | 90.6 | $ | 134.8 | ||||||
The April 2, 2005 balance of approximately $134.8 million consisted of lease liabilities and other exit cost liabilities of $113.8 million and $21.0 million, respectively and includes lease liabilities of $41.6 million and other exit costs of $2.6 million associated with discontinued operations.
The Company provided for closed store liabilities in the quarter to reflect the estimated post-closing lease liabilities and other exit costs associated with the related store closing commitments. These other exit costs include estimated utilities, real estate taxes, common area maintenance and insurance costs to be incurred after the store closes over the remaining lease term (all of which are contractually required payments under the lease agreements). Store closings are generally completed within one year after the decision to close. The closed store liabilities are paid over the lease terms associated with the closed stores. As of April 2, 2005, closed store liabilities have remaining lease terms generally ranging from one to 18 years. Adjustments to closed store liabilities and other exit costs primarily relate to changes in subtenants and actual exit costs differing from original estimates. Adjustments are made for changes in estimates in the period in which the change becomes known. Any excess store closing liability remaining upon settlement of the obligation is reversed in the period that such settlement is determined. The Company uses a discount rate based on the current treasury note rates adjusted for the Companys current credit spread to calculate the present value of the remaining liabilities on closed stores.
13
Except for stores classified as discontinued operations, the revenues and operating results for stores closed and not relocated are not material to the Companys revenues and operating results for the quarter. Future cash obligations for closed store liabilities are tied principally to the remaining non-cancelable lease payments less sublease payments to be received.
12) Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards
In March 2005, the Financial Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, An Interpretation of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. FIN No. 47 clarifies the requirements to record liabilities stemming from a legal obligation to clean up and retire fixed assets, when retirement depends on a future event. FASB believes this interpretation will result in more consistent recognition of liabilities relating to asset retirement obligations, more information about expected future cash outflows associated with the obligations and investments in long-lived assets because additional asset retirement costs will be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the assets. FIN No. 47 will be effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Retrospective application for interim financial information is permitted but not required. Early adoption is encouraged. The adoption of this standard does not have an impact on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2004, FASB issued a revision of FASB Statement No. 123 (FAS 123R), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation which supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The guidance represents the requirement that the compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. Compensation cost should be measured based on the fair value on their grant-date of the equity (or liability) instruments issued. This statement covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements, including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee purchase plans. Previous guidance established a fair-value-based method of accounting, as preferable, but permitted entities the alternative of continuing to disclose in the footnotes what net income would have been had the preferable method been used. The Company early adopted this standard in the first quarter of 2005, using the modified prospective method. With the application of the modified prospective method, the Company did not restate financial statements for any prior interim periods and fiscal years. The Company historically applied the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion 25. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R, the Company recorded $4.7 million in the first quarter of 2005 for stock compensation expense (See Note 6).
There were no modifications made to outstanding share options, changes in the quantity or type of instruments used or changes in the terms of share-based payment arrangements made prior to the adoption of FAS 123R. Historically, the straight-line method was used to allocate the option valuation amounts evenly over their respective vesting schedules. However, with adoption of FAS 123R, the Company will use the graded method prospectively beginning with 2005 stock compensation grants.
14
13) Guarantor Subsidiaries
Delhaize America, Inc. has issued 7.375% notes due 2006, 7.55% notes due 2007, 8.125% notes due 2011, 8.05% notes due 2027 and 9.00% debentures due 2031. Substantially all of Delhaize Americas subsidiaries (the Guarantor Subsidiaries) have fully and unconditionally, jointly and severally guaranteed this debt. The Guarantor Subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The non-guaranteeing subsidiaries represent less than 3% on an individual and aggregate basis of consolidated assets, pretax earnings, cash flow, and equity. Therefore, the non-guarantor subsidiaries information is not separately presented in the tables below, but rather is included in the column labeled Guarantor Subsidiaries. Condensed consolidated financial information for the Company and its Guarantor Subsidiaries is as follow:
Delhaize America, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the 13 Weeks ended April 2, 2005
(Dollars in thousands) |
Parent (Issuer) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated | ||||||||||
Net sales and other revenues |
$ | | $ | 4,026,735 | $ | | $ | 4,026,735 | ||||||
Cost of goods sold |
| 2,967,145 | | 2,967,145 | ||||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
8,572 | 845,516 | | 854,088 | ||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(8,572 | ) | 214,074 | | 205,502 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
55,999 | 24,872 | | 80,871 | ||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
(109,580 | ) | | 109,580 | | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
45,009 | 189,202 | (109,580 | ) | 124,631 | |||||||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
(24,537 | ) | 77,429 | | 52,892 | |||||||||
Income before loss from discontinued operations |
69,546 | 111,773 | (109,580 | ) | 71,739 | |||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 2,193 | | 2,193 | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 69,546 | $ | 109,580 | $ | (109,580 | ) | $ | 69,546 | |||||
Delhaize America, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Income For the 13 Weeks ended April 3, 2004 | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
Parent (Issuer) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated | ||||||||||
Net sales and other revenues |
$ | | $ | 3,853,639 | $ | | $ | 3,853,639 | ||||||
Cost of goods sold |
| 2,856,673 | | 2,856,673 | ||||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
8,275 | 780,249 | | 788,524 | ||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(8,275 | ) | 216,717 | | 208,442 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
56,456 | 23,596 | | 80,052 | ||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
(63,731 | ) | | 63,731 | | |||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes |
(1,000 | ) | 193,121 | (63,731 | ) | 128,390 | ||||||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
(24,598 | ) | 75,665 | | 51,067 | |||||||||
Income before loss from discontinued operations |
23,598 | 117,456 | (63,731 | ) | 77,323 | |||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| 53,725 | | 53,725 | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 23,598 | $ | 63,731 | $ | (63,731 | ) | $ | 23,598 | |||||
15
Delhaize America, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of April 2, 2005
(Dollars in thousands) |
Parent (Issuer) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated | |||||||||
Assets |
|||||||||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 449,383 | $ | 126,839 | $ | | $ | 576,222 | |||||
Receivables, net |
863 | 113,598 | (863 | ) | 113,598 | ||||||||
Receivable from affiliate |
10,599 | 48,846 | (46,798 | ) | 12,647 | ||||||||
Inventories |
| 1,152,182 | | 1,152,182 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
2,934 | 93,527 | | 96,461 | |||||||||
Other assets |
| 13,220 | | 13,220 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
463,779 | 1,548,212 | (47,661 | ) | 1,964,330 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
11,289 | 2,984,112 | | 2,995,401 | |||||||||
Goodwill |
| 3,049,459 | | 3,049,459 | |||||||||
Other intangibles, net |
| 723,559 | | 723,559 | |||||||||
Reinsurance recoverable from affiliate |
| 140,115 | | 140,115 | |||||||||
Deferred tax asset |
64,286 | | (64,286 | ) | | ||||||||
Other assets |
101,741 | 64,968 | | 166,709 | |||||||||
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries |
6,020,063 | | (6,020,063 | ) | | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,661,158 | $ | 8,510,425 | $ | (6,132,010 | ) | $ | 9,039,573 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 111 | $ | 717,620 | $ | | $ | 717,731 | |||||
Payable to affiliate |
36,166 | 10,632 | (46,798 | ) | | ||||||||
Accrued expenses |
111,515 | 238,395 | | 349,910 | |||||||||
Capital lease obligations - current |
| 41,288 | | 41,288 | |||||||||
Long-term debt - current |
| 13,115 | (863 | ) | 12,252 | ||||||||
Other liabilities - current |
| 33,999 | | 33,999 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 1,157 | | 1,157 | |||||||||
Income taxes payable |
86,247 | 16,654 | | 102,901 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities |
234,039 | 1,072,860 | (47,661 | ) | 1,259,238 | ||||||||
Long-term debt |
2,789,322 | 66,017 | | 2,855,339 | |||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
| 731,970 | | 731,970 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 306,875 | (64,286 | ) | 242,589 | ||||||||
Other liabilities |
816 | 312,640 | | 313,456 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
3,024,177 | 2,490,362 | (111,947 | ) | 5,402,592 | ||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) |
|||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
3,636,981 | 6,020,063 | (6,020,063 | ) | 3,636,981 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 6,661,158 | $ | 8,510,425 | $ | (6,132,010 | ) | $ | 9,039,573 | ||||
16
Delhaize America, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of January 1, 2005
(Dollars in thousands) |
Parent (Issuer) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated | |||||||||
Assets |
|||||||||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 351,294 | $ | 148,571 | $ | | $ | 499,865 | |||||
Receivables, net |
1,123 | 120,714 | (849 | ) | 120,988 | ||||||||
Receivable from affiliate |
15,290 | 52,147 | (50,001 | ) | 17,436 | ||||||||
Inventories |
| 1,144,904 | | 1,144,904 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
1,876 | 48,048 | | 49,924 | |||||||||
Other assets |
| 13,472 | | 13,472 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
369,583 | 1,527,856 | (50,850 | ) | 1,846,589 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
9,852 | 2,976,951 | | 2,986,803 | |||||||||
Goodwill |
| 3,049,622 | | 3,049,622 | |||||||||
Other intangibles, net |
| 733,194 | | 733,194 | |||||||||
Reinsurance recoverable from affiliate (Note 1) |
| 136,845 | | 136,845 | |||||||||
Deferred tax asset |
65,081 | | (65,081 | ) | | ||||||||
Other assets |
102,694 | 72,525 | | 175,219 | |||||||||
Investment in and advances to subsidiaries |
5,968,984 | | (5,968,984 | ) | | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,516,194 | $ | 8,496,993 | $ | (6,084,915 | ) | $ | 8,928,272 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 154 | $ | 735,151 | $ | | $ | 735,305 | |||||
Dividend payable |
25,029 | | | 25,029 | |||||||||
Payable to affiliate |
38,924 | 12,002 | (50,001 | ) | 925 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses |
55,870 | 239,267 | | 295,137 | |||||||||
Capital lease obligations - current |
| 40,639 | | 40,639 | |||||||||
Long-term debt - current |
| 13,144 | (849 | ) | 12,295 | ||||||||
Other liabilities - current |
| 40,596 | | 40,596 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 3,349 | | 3,349 | |||||||||
Income taxes payable |
31,850 | 19,609 | | 51,459 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities |
151,827 | 1,103,757 | (50,850 | ) | 1,204,734 | ||||||||
Long-term debt |
2,794,612 | 71,616 | | 2,866,228 | |||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
| 722,113 | | 722,113 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 315,404 | (65,081 | ) | 250,323 | ||||||||
Other liabilities |
705 | 315,119 | | 315,824 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,947,144 | 2,528,009 | (115,931 | ) | 5,359,222 | ||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17) |
|||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
3,569,050 | 5,968,984 | (5,968,984 | ) | 3,569,050 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 6,516,194 | $ | 8,496,993 | $ | (6,084,915 | ) | $ | 8,928,272 | ||||
17
Delhaize America, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the 13 Weeks ended April 2, 2005
(Dollars in thousands) |
Parent (Issuer) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Consolidated |
|||||||||
Net cash (used by) provided by operating activities |
$ | (2,070 | ) | $ | 223,119 | $ | 221,049 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(1,705 | ) | (99,961 | ) | (101,666 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property |
| 2,329 | 2,329 | |||||||||
Other investment activity |
(3,760 | ) | 3,481 | (279 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(5,465 | ) | (94,151 | ) | (99,616 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
| (5,876 | ) | (5,876 | ) | |||||||
Principal payments under capital lease obligations |
| (11,082 | ) | (11,082 | ) | |||||||
Transfer from escrow to fund long-term debt |
| 5,636 | 5,636 | |||||||||
Dividends paid |
(25,029 | ) | | (25,029 | ) | |||||||
Net change in advances to subsidiaries |
139,378 | (139,378 | ) | | ||||||||
Parent common stock repurchased |
(14,878 | ) | | (14,878 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
2,470 | | 2,470 | |||||||||
Excess tax benefits related to stock options |
3,683 | | 3,683 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
105,624 | (150,700 | ) | (45,076 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
98,089 | (21,732 | ) | 76,357 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
351,294 | 148,571 | 499,865 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 449,383 | $ | 126,839 | $ | 576,222 | ||||||
Delhaize America, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the 13 Weeks ended April 3, 2004
(Dollars in thousands) |
Parent (Issuer) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Consolidated |
|||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
$ | (6,031 | ) | $ | 243,485 | $ | 237,454 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(1 | ) | (58,262 | ) | (58,263 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of property |
| 4,692 | 4,692 | |||||||||
Other investment activity |
(2,542 | ) | 29 | (2,513 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,543 | ) | (53,541 | ) | (56,084 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
| (2,318 | ) | (2,318 | ) | |||||||
Principal payments under capital lease obligations |
| (8,488 | ) | (8,488 | ) | |||||||
Transfer from escrow to fund long- term debt |
| 2,808 | 2,808 | |||||||||
Net change in advances to subsidiaries |
198,211 | (198,211 | ) | | ||||||||
Parent common stock repurchased |
(4,999 | ) | | (4,999 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
1,024 | | 1,024 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
194,236 | (206,209 | ) | (11,973 | ) | |||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
185,662 | (16,265 | ) | 169,397 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
147,090 | 166,539 | 313,629 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 332,752 | $ | 150,274 | $ | 483,026 | ||||||
18
The wholly-owned direct subsidiaries named below fully and unconditionally and jointly and severally guarantee Delhaize Americas 7.375% notes due 2006, 7.55% notes due 2007, 8.125% notes due 2011, 8.05% notes due 2027 and 9.00% debentures due 2031.
| Food Lion, LLC is a North Carolina limited liability company that operates substantially all of the Companys Food Lion stores. Food Lions executive offices are located at 2110 Executive Drive, Salisbury, North Carolina 28145-1330. |
| Hannaford Bros. Co. is a Maine corporation that operates substantially all of the Companys Hannaford stores. Hannafords executive offices are located at 145 Pleasant Hill Road, Scarborough, Maine 04074. |
| Kash n Karry Food Stores, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that operates all the Companys Kash n Karry stores. Kash n Karry executive offices are located at 3801 Sugar Palm Drive, Tampa, Florida 33619. |
| J.H. Harvey Co., LLC is a Georgia limited liability company that operates all of the Companys Harveys stores. Harveys executive offices are located at 727 S. Davis Street, Nashville, Georgia 31639. |
14) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits arising out of the normal conduct of its business. Although the ultimate outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, the Companys management believes that the resulting liability, if any, would not have a material effect upon the Companys consolidated results of operation, financial position or liquidity.
The Company continues to experience both federal and state audits of its income tax filings, which it considers to be part of its ongoing business activity. In particular, the Company has experienced an increase in audit and assessment activity during both fiscal 2003 and 2004, which it expects to continue. While the ultimate outcome of these federal and state audits is not certain, the Company has considered the merits of its filing positions in its overall evaluation of potential tax liabilities and believes it has adequate liabilities recorded in its consolidated financial statements for exposures on these matters. Based on the Companys evaluation of the potential tax liabilities and the merits of its filing positions, the Company also believes it is unlikely that potential tax exposures over and above the amounts currently recorded as liabilities in its consolidated financial statements will be material to its financial condition or future results of operation.
15) Subsequent Event
On April 22, 2005, the Company entered into a new $500.0 million five-year unsecured revolving credit agreement, replacing and terminating the existing $350.0 secured credit agreement maturing July 2005. The new credit agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants similar to the previously existing agreement, with exception for the asset coverage ratio. The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on April 26, 2005 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, disclosing its entry into the new credit agreement and the termination of the previous credit agreement.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation (13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 compared to the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2004)
The following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2005.
Executive Summary
Delhaize America, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Delhaize Group, engages in one line of business, the operation of retail food supermarkets in the eastern United States. Delhaize America is a holding company that does business primarily under the banners Food Lion, Hannaford, Kash n Karry and Harveys. Our stores sell a wide variety of groceries, produce, meats, dairy products, seafood, frozen food, deli-bakery and non-food items such as health and beauty care, prescription medicines, and other household and personal products. We offer nationally and regionally advertised brand name merchandise as well as products manufactured and packaged for us under the private labels of Food Lion, Hannaford, Kash n Karry and Harveys.
19
Our business is highly competitive and characterized by narrow profit margins. We compete with national, regional and local supermarket chains, supercenters, discount food stores, specialty stores, convenience stores, warehouse clubs, drug stores and restaurants. We continue to develop and evaluate new retailing strategies at each of our banners in the eastern United States to respond to local consumers needs and maintain and increase our market share.
During the first quarter of 2005, Delhaize America posted increased sales and improving gross margins, as compared to the first quarter of 2004.
First Quarter Highlights:
| Gross Margin Improvement. Opportunities for margin optimization have been enhanced with the implementation of the new inventory system and margin management processes in fiscal 2004 at our Food Lion and Kash n Karry banners. We continue to recognize improvements in margin, shrink control and inventory management through full visibility to item-level detail data provided by this system. Food Lion continues to experience a decrease in inventory shrinkage and is making related decisions to increase sales and margins. |
| Butchers Brand. In April 2005 Food Lion launched Butchers Brand Premium Beef. The development of this exclusive private label line of fresh beef was preceded by extensive customer research, the selection of the best suppliers, an intensive in-house training program, and the rollout of new quality standards. This new brand is part of our Companys strategy to enhance the offering and customer experience in our fresh departments. |
| Selling and Administrative Expenses. During the first quarter of 2005, we incurred additional salaries, benefits and other general expenses primarily for the 19 Victory stores acquired during fourth quarter of 2004, rebranding of Kash n Karry to its new banner name Sweetbay and support for Food Lions two new market renewal efforts in advance of their related sales benefits. We also adopted FAS 123R during first quarter of 2005, which resulted in stock compensation expense of $4.7 million recorded in selling and administrative expenses. |
| Kash n Karry. In the fourth quarter of 2004, Sweetbay Supermarket, a new store concept to replace Kash n Karry in Florida, was launched. During the first quarter of 2005, all Kash n Karry stores in the market of Fort Myers/Naples were relaunched under the Sweetbay Supermarket brand. We currently have ten Sweetbay stores in operation. |
| Integration of Victory. During the first quarter of 2005, Hannaford worked on the integration of the 19 Victory Super Markets acquired in fourth quarter of 2004. The point of sale, inventory and store deliveries systems have been changed and the supply chain was switched to Hannafords self distribution in January 2005. Victory started to introduce Hannafords private label products and the prices of many products were lowered to align Victory to Hannafords Everyday Low Price pricing strategy. During the first quarter of 2005, two Victory stores were converted to the Hannaford banner. The remaining stores will be converted by the end of the year. |
| Growth of Harveys. Following the success of the 13 Food Lion stores converted to Harveys during 2004, six additional Food Lion stores were converted to Harveys during the first quarter of 2005. Harveys is strengthening our position in the Georgia market where we did not have a strong presence, giving us opportunities to focus on local consumers needs in this market to grow the Harveys business. |
2005 Remaining Outlook:
| Food Lion will complete market renewal programs in Greensboro, North Carolina in mid-2005 and in Baltimore, Maryland in the fall of 2005. |
| Kash n Karry will continue to be rebranded over the coming three years to the new banner name Sweetbay Supermarket. We plan to convert or open approximately 16 more stores under the Sweetbay banner by the end of 2005. |
| Harveys plans to convert an additional six Food Lion stores to its banner. These conversions are expected to enhance our Companys presence in Harveys primary market area by tapping into the strength of the local Harveys brand. |
Critical Accounting Policies
We have chosen accounting policies we believe are appropriate to accurately and fairly report our operating results and financial position and we apply these accounting policies in a consistent manner. The significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2005.
20
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based on historical and other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and may retain outside consultants, lawyers and actuaries to assist in our evaluation. We believe the following accounting policies are the most critical because they involve the most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Asset impairment- We periodically evaluate the period of depreciation or amortization for long-lived assets to determine whether current circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives. We monitor the carrying value of our retail stores, our lowest level asset group for which identifiable cash flows are independent of other groups of assets and liabilities, for potential impairment based on projected future cash flows. If impairment is identified for retail stores, we compare the asset groups estimated fair value to its current carrying value and record provisions for impairment as appropriate. With respect to owned property and equipment associated with closed stores, the value of the property and equipment is adjusted to reflect recoverable values based on our previous experience in disposing of similar assets and current economic conditions.
Impairment losses are significantly impacted by estimates of future operating cash flows and estimates of fair value. We estimate future cash flows based on the experience and knowledge of the markets in which our stores are located. These estimates are adjusted for variable factors such as inflation and general economic conditions. We estimate fair value based on our experience and knowledge of the real estate markets where the store is located and also include an independent third-party appraiser in certain situations.
Goodwill and other intangible assets- We conduct an annual assessment of potential impairment of goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets by comparing the book value of these assets to their current fair value. Fair value is estimated based on discounted cash flow projections provided by reporting unit management. When the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a provision for impairment is recorded. We conduct an annual impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of each year or when events or circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
The evaluation of goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives for impairment requires management to use significant judgments and estimates including, but not limited to, projected future revenue, cash flows and discount rates. We believe that, based on current conditions, material goodwill and intangible impairments are not likely to occur. However, a change in assumptions or market conditions could result in a change in estimated future cash flows and the likelihood of material impairment.
Inventories- Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market determined by the Last-in, First-out (LIFO) method. Meat, produce, deli-bakery and seafood inventories are valued on the average cost method rather than the LIFO method. We evaluate inventory shrinkage throughout the year based on actual physical counts in our stores and distribution centers and record adjustments based on the results of these counts to provide for the estimated shrinkage as of the balance sheet date.
Leases- Our stores operate principally in leased premises. We account for leases under the provisions of SFAS No.13, Accounting for Leases, and related accounting guidance. For lease agreements that provide for escalating rent payments, we recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and option renewal periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty such that renewal appears, at the inception of the lease, to be reasonably assured. Rent incurred during the construction and development of a store is capitalized as a component of property and equipment. The lease term commences when we become obligated under the terms of the lease agreement and extends over the non-cancelable term and option renewal periods where failure to exercise such option would result in an economic penalty such that renewal appears to be reasonably assured.
When evaluating leases, we use significant judgments and estimates, which include the determination of the lease term, incremental borrowing rates and fair market values. The determination of the lease term involves judgments as to whether an economic penalty exists which reasonably assures renewal of option periods. The incremental borrowing rate is used to calculate the present value of future rent payments and is based on the current yield for publicly traded debt for our Company. The fair market value of the leased premises is based on our experience and knowledge of the real estate markets where the store is located and includes an independent third-party appraiser in certain situations.
Self-insurance- We are self-insured for workers compensation, general liability and auto claims. The self-insurance liability is determined actuarially, based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Maximum retention, including defense costs per occurrence, ranges from (i) $0.5 million to $1.0 million per accident for workers compensation, (ii) $5.0 million per accident for automobile liability, and (iii) $3.0 million per accident for general liability, with an additional $5.0 million retention in excess of the primary $3.0 million general liability retention for druggist liability. We are insured for costs related to covered claims, including defense costs, in excess of these retentions. The significant assumptions used in the development of the actuarial estimates are grounded upon our historical claims data, including the average monthly claims and the average lag time between incurrence and payment.
We implemented a captive insurance program in fiscal 2001 pursuant to which the self-insured reserves related to workers compensation, general liability and auto coverage were reinsured by Pride
21
Reinsurance Company (Pride), an Irish reinsurance captive, owned by an affiliated company of Delhaize Group. The purpose for implementing the captive insurance program is to provide Delhaize Group continuing flexibility in its risk management program while providing certain excess loss protection through anticipated reinsurance contracts with Pride. Premiums are transferred annually to Pride through Delhaize Insurance Co., a subsidiary of Delhaize America.
The actuarial estimates are subject to a high degree of uncertainty from various sources, including changes in claim reporting patterns, claim settlement patterns, judicial decisions, legislation, and economic conditions. Although we believe the actuarial estimates are reasonable, significant differences related to the items noted above could materially affect our self-insurance obligations and the level of future premiums to Pride.
Our property insurance includes self-insured retentions per occurrence to (i) $5.0 million for named storms, (ii) $5.0 million for Zone A flood losses, (iii) $5.0 million for earthquakes, and (iv) $2.5 million for all other losses.
Stock compensation- We early adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (Statement 123R) during the first quarter of 2005, using the modified prospective approach. Historically, we applied the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and the straight-line method was used to allocate the option valuation amounts evenly over their respective vesting schedules.
Historically, for purposes of the disclosures required by the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, the straight-line method was used to allocate the option valuation amounts evenly over their respective vesting schedules. We elected to apply the revised standard using the modified prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized in fiscal year 2005 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 2, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 2, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R. We are not required to restate financial statements for any prior interim and fiscal years.
The fair value of restricted stock unit awards is determined based on the number of shares granted and the market price at the grant dates. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which is consistent with our valuation techniques previously utilized for options in disclosures required under SFAS No. 123. Such value is recognized as expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures, using the accelerated method under FAS 123R prospectively, beginning with 2005 stock compensation grants.
Estimating the fair value of options requires us to use significant estimates and judgments, which include expected dividend yield, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected term. The expected dividend yield is calculated by dividing the Delhaize Group annual dividend by the share price at the date of grant for options. The expected volatility represents a five year historical volatility and the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option. The expected term is based on a ten year historical exercise pattern.
Store closing reserves- We provide for closed store liabilities to reflect the estimated post-closing lease liabilities and other exit costs associated with the related store closing commitments. Other exit costs include estimated utilities, real estate taxes, common area maintenance, and insurance costs to be incurred after the store closes over the remaining lease term (all of which are contractually required payments under the lease agreements). Store closings are generally completed within one year after the decision to close. The closed store liabilities are paid over the lease terms associated with the closed stores. Adjustments to closed store liabilities and other exit costs primarily relate to changes in subtenants and actual exit costs differing from original estimates. Adjustments are made for changes in estimates in the period in which the change becomes known. Any excess store closing liability remaining upon settlement of the obligation is reversed in the period that such settlement is determined. We estimate the lease liabilities, net of sublease income; using a discount rate based on the current treasury note rates adjusted for our current credit spread to calculate the present value of the remaining liabilities on closed stores.
Inventory write-downs, if any, in connection with store closings, are classified in cost of sales. Costs to transfer inventory and equipment from closed stores are expensed as incurred. When severance costs are incurred in connection with store closings, a liability for the termination benefits is recognized and measured at its fair value at the communication date. Store closing liabilities are reviewed quarterly to ensure that any accrued amounts appropriately reflect the outstanding commitments and that any additional costs are accrued or amounts that are no longer needed for their originally intended purpose are reversed.
Calculating the estimated losses requires significant judgments and estimates that could be impacted by factors such as the extent of interested buyers, the ability to obtain subleases, the creditworthiness of sublessees, and our success at negotiating early termination agreements with lessors. These factors are significantly dependent on general economic conditions and resultant demand for commercial property.
Supplier allowances- We receive allowances, credits and income from suppliers primarily for volume incentives, new product introductions, in-store promotions and co-operative advertising. Volume incentives are based on contractual arrangements generally covering a period of one year or less and have been included in the cost of inventory and recognized as earned in cost of sales when the product is sold. New product introduction allowances compensate us for costs incurred associated with product handling and have been deferred and recognized as a reduction in cost of sales over the product introductory period. Non-refundable credits from suppliers for in-store promotions such as product displays require related activities by our Company. Similarly, co-operative advertising requires us to conduct the related advertising. In-store promotion and co-operative advertising income is recorded as a reduction in the cost of inventory and recognized in cost of sales when the product is sold unless the allowance represents the reimbursement of a specific, incremental and identifiable cost incurred by our Company to sell the vendors product. We have reviewed the funding received from vendors for in-store promotions and co-operative advertising and concluded that these arrangements are primarily for general advertising purposes and not the reimbursement of a specific, incremental and identifiable cost incurred by our Company.
22
Estimating some rebates received from third party vendors requires us to make assumptions and judgments regarding specific purchase or sales levels and related inventory turns. We constantly review the relevant significant assumptions and estimates and make adjustments as necessary. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates used are reasonable, significant changes in these arrangements or purchase volumes could have a material effect on future cost of sales.
Results of Operation
The following tables set forth the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 and for the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 for informational purposes. The 2004 results have been adjusted to classify the results of operation for the four stores closed after the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 as discontinued operations. The net sales and other revenues, cost of goods sold, and selling and administrative expenses are reflected on a net basis in discontinued operations in our condensed consolidated statement of income.
(Dollars in thousands) | 13 Weeks April 2, 2005 |
13 Weeks April 3, 2004 | ||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||
Net sales and other revenues |
$ | 4,026,735 | $ | 3,853,639 | ||
Cost of goods sold |
2,967,145 | 2,856,673 | ||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
854,088 | 788,524 | ||||
Operating income |
205,502 | 208,442 | ||||
Interest expense |
80,871 | 80,052 | ||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
124,631 | 128,390 | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
52,892 | 51,067 | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
71,739 | 77,323 | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
2,193 | 53,725 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 69,546 | $ | 23,598 | ||
The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage which the listed amounts bear to net sales and other revenues:
13 Weeks Ended April 2, 2005 |
13 Weeks Ended April 3, 2004 | |||
% (unaudited) |
% (unaudited) | |||
Net sales and other revenues |
100.00 | 100.00 | ||
Cost of goods sold |
73.69 | 74.13 | ||
Selling and administrative expenses |
21.21 | 20.46 | ||
Operating income |
5.10 | 5.41 | ||
Interest expense |
2.01 | 2.08 | ||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
3.09 | 3.33 | ||
Provision for income taxes |
1.31 | 1.33 | ||
Income from continuing operations |
1.78 | 2.00 | ||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
0.05 | 1.39 | ||
Net income |
1.73 | 0.61 | ||
Sales
(Dollars in billions) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 | ||||
Net sales and other revenues |
$ | 4.0 | $ | 3.9 |
We record revenues primarily from the sale of products in our retail stores. Net sales and other revenues increased 4.5% over the corresponding period of 2004 driven primarily by the acquisition of 19 Victory stores during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 and new store sales. Comparable store sales increased 0.5% during the first quarter of 2005. Comparable store sales adjusted for the timing of Easter, increased 0.3% in the first quarter of 2005 (compared to 2.5% in the first quarter of 2004). Sales continued to be strong at Hannaford and Kash n Karry. Sales growth at Food Lion and Harveys slowed primarily due to increased competitive activity.
23
We continue to see significant competitive activity as a greater number of retailers battle for the consumers dollars. During the first quarter of 2005, we experienced 13 competitive store openings offset by 24 competitive closings (primarily Winn-Dixie closings) in our operating area. In addition, many competitors continued to invest heavily in promotional spending in the form of aggressive advertised pricing, buy one and get one or two free offers, double and triple couponing and other aggressive pricing strategies.
As of April 2, 2005, we operated 1,531 stores. Our retail store square footage totaled 56.6 million square feet at April 2, 2005, resulting in a 4.0% increase over the comparable period of 2004. Detail of store activity for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 is shown below:
Food Lion |
Hannaford |
Kash n Karry |
Harveys |
Total |
|||||||||
Stores at beginning of year |
1,222 | 142 | 104 | 55 | 1,523 | ||||||||
Stores opened |
7 | | 3 | | 10 | ||||||||
Stores acquired |
| | | ||||||||||
Stores closed |
| | | | | ||||||||
Stores relocated |
(2 | ) | | | | (2 | ) | ||||||
Stores converted |
(6 | ) | | | 6 | | |||||||
Stores at April 2, 2005 |
1,221 | 142 | 107 | ** | 61 | 1,531 | |||||||
Net change for the quarter |
(1 | ) | | 3 | 6 | 8 | |||||||
Stores remodeled |
4 | 1 | 1 | | 6 |
** | Note Includes ten Sweetbay Supermarkets. |
Gross Profit
(Percent of net sales and other revenues) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 |
||||
Gross profit |
26.31 | % | 25.87 | % |
Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased in the first quarter of 2005 compared with the corresponding period in 2004 primarily due to lower inventory shrink at Food Lion and continued focus on optimizing margin to drive sustainable profitable sales at all of our operating companies. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, we successfully completed the transition of all of our Food Lion and Kash n Karry stores to a new inventory and margin management system, which was first developed at Hannaford and modified to address the specific needs of Food Lion and Kash n Karry. This system has enabled us to improve our current margin analysis, shrink control and inventory management through full visibility to item-level detail data.
Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, and we value approximately 76% of our inventory using the Last-in, First-out or LIFO method.
Our LIFO reserve increased $3.2 million for the first quarter of 2005 and $1.4 million for the same period last year. The charge in the first quarter of 2005 is a result of modest inflation across most product categories.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
(Percent of net sales and other revenues) |
13 weeks April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks April 3, 2004 |
||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
21.21 | % | 20.46 | % | ||
Selling and administrative expenses excluding depreciation and amortization |
18.26 | % | 17.45 | % |
For the first quarter of 2005, selling and administrative expenses as a percent of sales increased over the first quarter of 2004 primarily due to expenses for the 19 Victory stores acquired during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, expenses incurred for the rebranding of Kash n Karry to its new banner name Sweetbay and support for Food Lions two market renewal efforts in advance of their offsetting sales increases. An additional increase in selling and administrative expenses over the first quarter of 2004 is the recording of $4.7 million in stock compensation expense as the result of the Companys adoption of FAS 123R (See Note 6).
24
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
(Dollars in millions) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 |
||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
$ | 118.6 | $ | 116.1 | ||||
Percent of net sales and other revenues |
2.95 | % | 3.01 | % |
The increase in depreciation and amortization for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 compared to the corresponding period last year is primarily due to the acquisition of the 19 Victory stores acquired in fiscal 2004, equipment purchases for new stores and renovations and additional store capital leases since the first quarter of 2004.
Interest Expense
(Dollars in millions) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 |
||||||
Interest Expense |
$ | 80.9 | $ | 80.1 | ||||
Percent of net sales and other revenues |
2.01 | % | 2.08 | % |
Interest expense increased for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 as compared to the corresponding period primarily due to additional store capital leases and a decrease in the benefit from our interest rate swap agreements offset by increased investment income due to higher cash balances and the repurchase and redemption of $52.355 million of debt in the fourth quarter of 2004.
Discontinued Operations
During the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005, we did not close any underperforming stores. To date we have closed 83 underperforming stores classified as discontinued operations of which 39 closed during fiscal 2004 and 44 closed during fiscal 2003. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, a portion of the costs associated with the closure of these stores, as well as related operating activity prior to closing for these stores, was recorded in Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income.
Income Taxes
(Dollars in millions) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 |
||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 52.9 | $ | 51.1 | ||||
Effective tax rate |
42.4 | % | 39.8 | % |
The effective tax rate increased for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 from April 3, 2004 primarily due to the non-deductible nature of qualified stock options (see Note 6, which more fully describes our Companys adoption of FAS 123R) as well as increased state audit activity.
The determination of our Companys provision for income taxes requires significant judgment, the use of estimates, and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Significant judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items.
We continue to experience both federal and state audits of our income tax filings, which we consider to be part of our ongoing business activity. In particular, we have experienced an increase in audit and assessment activity during both fiscal 2003 and 2004, which we expect to continue. While the ultimate outcome of these federal and state audits is not certain, we have considered the merits of our filing positions in our overall evaluation of potential tax liabilities and believe we have adequate liabilities recorded in our consolidated financial statements for exposures on these matters. Based on our evaluation of the potential tax liabilities and the merits of our filing positions, we also believe it is unlikely that potential tax exposures over and above the amounts currently recorded as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements will be material to our financial condition or future results of operation.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
(Dollars in millions) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 | ||||
Cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 221.0 | $ | 237.5 |
25
We have funded our operations and acquisitions from cash generated from our operations and borrowings.
At April 2, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $576.2 million compared with $483.0 million at April 3, 2004. We have historically generated positive cash flow from operations. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities over the comparable period is primarily due to changes in inventory offset by changes in receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses. The increase in inventory during first quarter of 2005 is to support the level of inventory needed to meet our store replenishment requirements and Food Lions preparation for the launch of its Butchers Brand meat program. The decrease in inventory for the first quarter of 2004 is primarily the result of the closing of 35 underperforming stores.
(Dollars in millions) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 | ||||
Cash flows used in investing activities |
$ | 99.6 | $ | 56.1 |
The increase in investing activities in the first quarter of 2005 was primarily due to an increase in capital expenditures, $101.7 million for the 13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 compared with $58.3 million for the comparable period. The increase in capital expenditures is primarily due to construction costs incurred for our market renewal programs in Greensboro, North Carolina and Baltimore, Maryland to be completed in mid-2005 and Fall of 2005, respectively, and costs to rebrand to Sweetbay Supermarket in Fort Myers/Naples, Florida. During the first quarter of 2005, we opened ten new stores and renovated six existing stores compared with four new stores and no renovations for the corresponding period last year.
In fiscal 2005, we plan to incur approximately $550 million of capital expenditures. We plan to finance capital expenditures during fiscal 2005 through funds generated from operations and existing bank facilities and the use of leases when necessary.
(Dollars in millions) |
13 weeks ended April 2, 2005 |
13 weeks ended April 3, 2004 | ||||
Cash flows used in financing activities |
$ | 45.1 | $ | 12.0 |
Cash used in financing activities increased in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004 primarily due to a dividend payment of $25.0 million during the first quarter of 2005 and increased purchases of parent common stock used for employee stock option exercises in first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period last year.
Debt
During the first quarter of 2005, we maintained a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of commercial banks providing $350.0 million in committed lines of credit. The credit facility was secured by certain inventory of our Companys retail operating subsidiaries and contains affirmative and negative covenants. Negative covenants include a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, and an asset coverage ratio. We must be in compliance with all covenants in order to have access to the credit facility. As of April 2, 2005, we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility. A deteriorating economic or operating environment can subject us to a risk of non-compliance with the covenants. We had no outstanding borrowings under this facility as of April 2, 2005, and had no borrowings during 2005 and 2004. This facility is utilized to provide short-term capital to meet liquidity needs as necessary.
On April 22, 2005, we entered into a new $500.0 million five-year unsecured revolving credit agreement, replacing and terminating the existing $350.0 secured credit agreement maturing July 2005. The new credit agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants similar to the previously existing agreement, with exception for the asset coverage ratio. We filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on April 26, 2005 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, disclosing our entry into the new credit agreement and the termination of the previous credit agreement.
At April 2, 2005, we had long-term debt as follows:
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||
Notes, 7.375%, due 2006 |
$ | 565,298 | (a) | |
Notes, 7.55%, due 2007 |
144,791 | (a) | ||
Notes, 8.125%, due 2011 |
1,096,620 | (a) | ||
Notes, 8.05%, due 2027 |
121,700 | (a) | ||
Debentures, 9.00%, due 2031 |
855,000 | |||
Medium-term notes, 8.67% to 8.73%, due 2006 |
5,050 | (a) | ||
Other notes, 6.31% to 14.15%, due 2005 to 2016 |
58,657 | (a) | ||
Mortgage payables, 7.55% to 8.65%, due 2005 to 2016 |
9,595 | (a) | ||
Financing lease, 7.25%, due 2005 to 2018 |
10,880 | |||
2,867,591 | ||||
Less current portion |
12,252 | |||
$ | 2,855,339 | |||
(a) | Net of associated discount and premium |
26
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we repurchased $36.536 million of our $600 million 7.375% notes, $5.0 million of our $150 million 7.55% notes, $7.867 million of other notes and $2.952 million of our mortgage payables.
In October 2003, our Hannaford banner invoked the defeasance provisions of its outstanding 7.41% Senior Notes due February 15, 2009, 8.54% Senior Notes due November 15, 2004, 6.50% Senior Notes due May 15, 2008, 6.58% Senior Notes due February 15, 2011, 7.06% Senior Notes due May 15, 2016 and 6.31% Senior Notes due May 15, 2008 (collectively, the Notes) and placed sufficient funds in an escrow account to satisfy the remaining principal and interest payments due on the Notes. As a result of this defeasance, Hannaford is no longer subject to the negative covenants contained in the agreements governing these notes. As of April 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005, $65.2 million and $65.2 million in aggregate principal amount of these notes was outstanding. Cash committed to fund the escrow and not available for general corporate purposes, is considered restricted. As of April 2, 2005 restricted funds of $13.0 million and $53.6 million are recorded in Current Other Assets and Non-current Other Assets. As of January 1, 2005 restricted funds of $13.1 million and $59.8 million are recorded in Current Other Assets and Non-current Other Assets.
We enter into significant leasing obligations related to our store properties. Capital lease obligations outstanding at April 2, 2005 were $773.3 million compared with $704.4 million at April 3, 2004. Lease agreements provide for initial terms of 20 and 25 years, with renewal options ranging from five to 20 years. We also had significant operating lease commitments at the end of fiscal 2004.
We also have periodic short-term borrowings under informal credit arrangements that are available to us at the lenders discretion. We had no borrowing outstanding as of April 2, 2005 or April 3, 2004.
Market Risk
Our Company is exposed to changes in interest rates primarily as a result of our long-term debt requirements. Our interest rate risk management objectives are to limit the effect of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs. We maintain certain variable-rate debt to take advantage of lower relative interest rates currently available. We have not entered into any of our financial instruments for trading purposes.
We maintain interest rate swaps against certain debt obligations, effectively converting a portion of the debt from fixed to variable rates. The notional principal amounts of interest rate swap arrangements as of April 2, 2005 were $300 million maturing in 2006 and $100 million maturing in 2011. Maturity dates of interest rate swap arrangements match those of the underlying debt. These agreements involve the exchange of fixed rate payments for variable rate payments without the exchange of the underlying principal amounts. Variable rates for our agreements are based on six-month or three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR and are reset on a semiannual basis or a quarterly basis. The differential between fixed and variable rates to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change in accordance with the agreements and recognized over the life of the agreements as an adjustment to interest expense. The $100 million notional swaps maturing in 2011 meet the criteria for using the short-cut method, which assumes 100% hedge effectiveness, as prescribed by SFAS No. 133, Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. During the fourth quarter of 2004, in association with the retirement of $36.536 million of our $600 million 7.375% notes, we de-designated the $300 million notional interest rate swaps as a fair value hedge of 50% of the $600 million 2006 notes, and re-designated them as fair value hedge of approximately 53% of the remaining $563.5 million 2006 Notes. These swaps meet the criteria of being highly effective swaps, as prescribed by SFAS No. 133, and currently carry no significant ineffectiveness. We have recorded a derivative asset in connection with all these agreements in the amount of $4.2 million and $8.3 million at April 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005, respectively, which is included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet in Non-current Other Assets.
In fiscal 2001, we settled certain interest rate hedge agreements in connection with the completion of an offering of notes, resulting in an unrealized loss of approximately $214 million. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 133 at the beginning of fiscal 2001, the unrealized loss was recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, and is being amortized to Interest expense over the term of the associated notes. The unrealized loss was reduced as of the date of the Delhaize Group share exchange as a result of the application of purchase accounting. The remaining unrealized loss net of taxes at April 2, 2005 and January 1, 2005 was $37.6 million and $38.9 million, respectively.
27
The table set forth below provides the expected principal payments and related interest rates of our long-term debt by fiscal year of maturity as of January 1, 2005.
(Dollars in millions) |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
Thereafter |
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
Notes, due 2006 |
$ | 563.5 | (a) | $ | 590.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
7.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes, due 2011 |
$ | 1,100.0 | (b) | $ | 1,282.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
8.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debentures, due 2031 |
$ | 855.0 | $ | 1,091.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
9.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medium-term notes |
$ | 5.0 | $ | 5.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
8.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes, due 2007 |
$ | 145.0 | $ | 156.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
7.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes, due 2027 |
$ | 126.0 | $ | 145.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
8.05 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage payables |
$ | 1.3 | $ | 1.4 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 1.0 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 3.6 | $ | 10.9 | |||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
8.09 | % | 8.10 | % | 8.10 | % | 7.76 | % | 7.75 | % | 8.08 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other notes |
$ | 12.1 | $ | 12.1 | $ | 12.2 | $ | 12.2 | $ | 5.8 | $ | 13.1 | (c) | $ | 71.1 | ||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
6.93 | % | 6.95 | % | 6.98 | % | 6.98 | % | 7.34 | % | 7.31 | % | |||||||||||||||
Financing lease |
$ | 0.6 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 7.9 | $ | 11.0 | |||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
7.25 | % | 7.25 | % | 7.25 | % | 7.25 | % | 7.25 | % | 7.25 | % |
(a) | $300.0 million notional amount was swapped for a variable interest rate based on a six-month or three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR reset on a semiannual or a quarterly basis. The carrying value of these notes was increased by $4.9 million at January 1, 2005, to reflect the fair value of the interest rate swap. |
(b) | $100.0 million notional amount was swapped for a variable interest rate based on a six-month or three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR reset on a semiannual or a quarterly basis. The carrying value of these notes was increased by $1.6 million at January 1, 2005, to reflect the fair value of the interest rate swap. |
(c) | See Note 7 of the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements for Hannaford defeasance discussion. |
We do not trade in foreign markets or in commodities, nor do we have significant concentrations of credit risk. Accordingly, we do not believe that foreign exchange risk, commodity risk or credit risk pose a significant threat to our Company.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We assume various financial obligations and commitments in the normal course of our operations and financing activities. Financial obligations are considered to represent known future cash payments that we are required to make under existing contractual arrangements, such as debt and lease agreements. A table representing the scheduled maturities of our contractual obligations as of January 1, 2005 was included under the heading Contractual Obligations and Commitments on page 23 of our Companys 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 1, 2005. At April 2, 2005, there were no significant changes from the table referenced above.
Self-Insurance
We are self-insured for workers compensation, general liability and auto claims. The self-insurance liability is determined actuarially, based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Maximum retention, including defense costs per occurrence, ranges from (i) $0.5 million to $1.0 million per accident for workers compensation, (ii) $5.0 million per accident for automobile liability, and (iii) $3.0 million per accident for general liability, with an additional $5.0 million retention in excess of the primary $3.0 million general liability retention for druggist liability. We are insured for costs related to covered claims, including defense costs, in excess of these retentions. It is possible that the final resolution of some of these claims may require us to make significant expenditures in excess of our existing reserves over an extended period of time and in a range of amounts that cannot be reasonably estimated.
We implemented a captive insurance program in fiscal 2001 pursuant to which the self-insured reserves related to workers
28
compensation, general liability and auto coverage were reinsured by Pride, an Irish reinsurance captive, owned by an affiliated company of Delhaize Group. The purpose for implementing the captive insurance program is to provide Delhaize Group continuing flexibility in its risk management program while providing certain excess loss protection through anticipated reinsurance contracts with Pride. Premiums are transferred annually to Pride through Delhaize Insurance Co., a subsidiary of Delhaize America.
Our property insurance includes self-insured retentions per occurrence to (i) $5.0 million for named storms, (ii) $5.0 million for Zone A flood losses, (iii) $5.0 million for earthquakes, and (iv) $2.5 million for all other losses. We incurred property loss of $11.4 million for hurricanes experienced during fiscal 2004 compared with property loss of $16.9 million related to Hurricane Isabel in fiscal 2003. Also in fiscal 2004, we received insurance reimbursement of $4.0 million related to Hurricane Isabel.
Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Standards
In March 2005, the Financial Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, An Interpretation of Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. FIN No. 47 clarifies the requirements to record liabilities stemming from a legal obligation to clean up and retire fixed assets, when retirement depends on a future event. FASB believes this interpretation will result in more consistent recognition of liabilities relating to asset retirement obligations, more information about expected future cash outflows associated with the obligations and investments in long-lived assets because additional asset retirement costs will be recognized as part of the carrying amounts of the assets. FIN No. 47 will be effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Retrospective application for interim financial information is permitted but not required. Early adoption is encouraged. The adoption of this standard does not have an impact on our financial statements.
In December 2004, FASB issued a revision of FASB Statement No. 123 (FAS 123R), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation which supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The guidance represents the requirement that the compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. Compensation cost should be measured based on the fair value on their grant-date of the equity (or liability) instruments issued. This statement covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements, including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee purchase plans. Previous guidance established a fair-value-based method of accounting, as preferable, but permitted entities the alternative of continuing to disclose in the footnotes what net income would have been had the preferable method been used. We early adopted this standard in the first quarter of 2005, using the modified prospective method. With the application of the modified prospective method, we did not restate financial statements for any prior interim periods and fiscal years. We historically applied the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion 25. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 123R, we recorded $4.7 million in the first quarter of 2005 for stock compensation expense (See Note 6).
There were no modifications made to outstanding share options, changes in the quantity or type of instruments used or changes in the terms of share-based payment arrangements made prior to the adoption of FAS 123R. Historically, the straight-line method was used to allocate the option valuation amounts evenly over their respective vesting schedules. However, with adoption of FAS 123R, we will use the graded method prospectively beginning with 2005 stock compensation grants.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information set forth under the heading Market Risk under Item 2 of this Form 10-Q is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
29
Exhibit |
Description | |
4 | Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 17, 2005 and effective as of January 1, 2005, by and among Delhaize America, Inc., Food Lion, LLC, Hannaford Bros. Co. Kash n Karry Food Stores, Inc., FL Food Lion, Inc., Risk Management Services, Inc., Hannbro Company, Martins Foods of South Burlington, Inc., Shop n Save-Mass, Inc., Hannaford Procurement Corp., Boney Wilson & Sons, Inc., J.H. Harvey Co., LLC, Hannaford Licensing Corp., Victory Distributors, Inc. and The Bank of New York | |
31(a) | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. § 7241) | |
31(b) | Certification of Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. § 7241) | |
32 | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) |
30
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.
DELHAIZE AMERICA, INC. | ||||
DATE: May 17, 2005 | BY: | /s/ Carol M. Herndon | ||
Carol M. Herndon | ||||
Executive Vice President of | ||||
Accounting and Analysis and | ||||
Chief Accounting Officer |
31
Exhibit |
Description | |
4 | Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 17, 2005 and effective as of January 1, 2005, by and among Delhaize America, Inc., Food Lion, LLC, Hannaford Bros. Co. Kash n Karry Food Stores, Inc., FL Food Lion, Inc., Risk Management Services, Inc., Hannbro Company, Martins Foods of South Burlington, Inc., Shop n Save-Mass, Inc., Hannaford Procurement Corp., Boney Wilson & Sons, Inc., J.H. Harvey Co., LLC, Hannaford Licensing Corp., Victory Distributors, Inc. and The Bank of New York | |
31(a) | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. § 7241) | |
31(b) | Certification of Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. § 7241) | |
32 | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) |
32