Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, or

For the transition period from              to              .

000-21669

(Commission File Number)

Digital Lightwave, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(727) 442-6677

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such report(s)), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨     NO  x

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock as of May 9, 2005, was 35,178,551.

Table of Contents

DIGITAL LIGHTWAVE, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

For the Period Ended March 31, 2005

INDEX

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

DIGITAL LIGHTWAVE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

DIGITAL LIGHTWAVE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per-share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

DIGITAL LIGHTWAVE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

DIGITAL LIGHTWAVE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business and Basis of Presentation

Digital Lightwave, Inc. provides the global fiber-optic communications industry with products and technology used to develop, install, maintain, monitor and manage fiber-optic communication networks. Telecommunications service providers, owners of private networks (utilities, government and large enterprises) and equipment manufacturers deploy Digital Lightwave, Inc. products to provide quality assurance and ensure optimum performance of advanced optical communications networks and network equipment. Digital Lightwave, Inc. products are sold worldwide to telecommunications service providers, owners of private networks (utilities, government and large enterprises), telecommunications equipment manufacturers, equipment leasing companies and international distributors. The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries are Digital Lightwave (UK) Limited (“DLL”), Digital Lightwave Asia Pacific Pty, Ltd. (“DLAP”), and Digital Lightwave Latino Americana Ltda. (“DLLA”). DLL, DLAP, and DLLA previously provided international sales support, but are currently inactive. All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of Digital Lightwave, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company,” “Digital Lightwave,” “us,” “we,” “our,” etc.) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of results for such periods. The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of results which may be achieved for the full fiscal year or for any future period. The unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in Digital Lightwave’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Operational Matters

The Company continues to have insufficient short-term resources for the payment of its current liabilities. During the first three months of 2005, the Company addressed this shortfall by obtaining financing from Optel Capital, LLC (“Optel”), an entity controlled by the Company’s largest stockholder and current chairman of the board of directors, Dr. Bryan J. Zwan. The Company has used the financing provided by Optel to fund (i) the satisfaction of substantially all of its outstanding debt and liabilities owed to creditors other than Optel, and (ii) the Company’s short-term working capital needs.

As of May 9, 2005, we owed Optel approximately $38.2 million in principal plus accrued interest thereon, which debt is secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of our assets and such debt accrues interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The maturity dates and corresponding payment schedules related to these obligations are as follows:

4

Table of Contents

On February 10, 2005, at a special meeting of our stockholders, the conversion feature of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note was approved by our stockholders. Accordingly, all or any portion of such debt is convertible into our common stock at the option of Optel at any time. The conversion price is based upon the volume-weighted average trading price of our common stock during the five-day period preceding the date of any conversion.

All of the foregoing transactions with Optel were approved by the Company’s board of directors, upon the recommendation of a special committee of the board. The special committee is composed solely of independent directors.

On March 11, 2005, we issued 981,258 shares of common stock to Optel in connection with Optel’s conversion of $1.0 million of the indebtedness outstanding under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note. As of May 9, 2005, the aggregate outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note was approximately $29.7 million, and the Applicable Conversion Price was approximately $0.417. Accordingly, on May 9, 2005, Optel had the right to convert the Secured Convertible Promissory Note into an aggregate of 71,112,695 shares of common stock. Further conversion by Optel of all or any portion of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note could significantly dilute the ownership interests of our other stockholders and give Optel and Dr. Zwan even greater control over the Company.

On August 23, 2004, Optel entered into a guarantee agreement (the “Guarantee Agreement”) with Jabil Circuit, Inc. (“Jabil”), pursuant to which Optel guaranteed certain obligations of the Company owing to Jabil relating to purchase orders for production material issued by the Company to Jabil after June 30, 2004. Optel’s maximum obligation under the Guarantee Agreement is $1.88 million. Prior to the completion of the Guarantee Agreement, the Company was required to prepay Jabil for all orders of production material. With the Guarantee Agreement in place, the Company is now able to pay for production material purchased from Jabil upon receipt of that material.

On March 15, 2005, Optel established an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $6.0 million on our behalf and naming MC Test Service, Inc. as beneficiary. MC Test Service, Inc. provides outsourced manufacturing services to us. With the letter of credit in place, MC Test Service, Inc. has extended to us regular payment terms to pay for purchased production material. The letter of credit expires on December 30, 2005.

We have entered into preliminary discussions with Optel to restructure the Short-Term Notes by extending the maturity date of such debt, to arrange for additional short-term working capital and to obtain additional financing through guarantees and letters of credit to secure vendor obligations. If we do not reach an agreement to restructure the Short-Term Notes and obtain additional financing from Optel, we will be unable to meet our obligations to Optel and our other creditors, and in an attempt to collect payment, our creditors, including Optel, may seek legal remedies.

The Company’s ability to meet cash requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity over the next 12 months is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing from funding sources which may include, but may not be limited to, Optel. If the Company is not able to obtain additional financing, it expects that it will not have sufficient cash to fund its working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the near term. Optel currently is and continues to be the principal source of financing for the Company. Further, the Company has not identified any funding source other than Optel that would be prepared to provide current or future financing to the Company.

The Company cannot assure that it will be able to obtain adequate financing, that it will achieve profitability or, if it achieves profitability that the profitability will be sustainable or that it will continue as a going concern. As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph for a going concern in its report for the year ended December 31, 2004, that was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2005.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. During fiscal years 2004 and 2003, the Company performed an impairment analysis related to the long-lived assets associated with the OTS product line. The impairment was calculated in accordance with the guidelines set forth in Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement (“FASB”) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and indicated future cash flows from the Company’s OTS product line were insufficient to cover the carrying value of the long-lived assets supporting the OTS product line. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, no impairment charges were recorded as there were no events which occurred that required a measurement for impairment.

5

Table of Contents

Accrued Warranty

The Company provides its customers a warranty with each product sold, which guarantees the reliability of the product for a period of one to three years. The Company’s policy for product warranties is to review the warranty reserve on a quarterly basis for specifically identified or new matters and to review the reserve for estimated future costs associated with any open warranty years. The reserve amount is an estimate based on historical trends, the number of products under warranty, the costs of replacement parts and the expected reliability of our products. A change in these factors could result in a change in the reserve balance. Warranty costs are charged against the reserve when incurred. The reconciliation of the warranty reserve is as follows:

Revenue Recognition

The Company derives its revenue from product sales. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of products when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, the price is fixed and determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

For all sales, the Company uses a binding purchase order as evidence that a sales arrangement exists. Sales through international distributors are evidenced by a master agreement governing the relationship with the distributor. The Company either obtains an end-user purchase order documenting the order placed with the distributor or proof of delivery to the end-user as evidence that a sales arrangement exists. For demonstration units sold to distributors, the distributor’s binding purchase order is evidence of a sales arrangement.

For domestic sales, delivery generally occurs when product is delivered to a common carrier. Demonstration units sold to international distributors are considered delivered when the units are delivered to a common carrier. An allowance is provided for sales returns based on historical experience.

For sales made under an original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) arrangement, delivery generally occurs when the product is delivered to a common carrier. OEM sales are defined as sales of Company products to a third party that will market the products under the third party’s brand.

For trade-in sales, including both Company and competitor products that have a cash component of greater than 25% of the fair value of the sale, the Company recognizes revenue based upon the fair value of what is sold or received, whichever is more readily determinable, if the Company has demonstrated the ability to sell its trade-in inventory for that particular product class. Otherwise, the Company accounts for the trade-in sale as a non-monetary transaction and follows the guidance found in Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions, and related interpretations. Revenue and cost of sales are recorded based upon the cash portion of the transaction. The remaining costs associated with the new units are assigned to the units received on trade. When the trade-in units are resold, revenue is recorded based upon the sales price and cost of goods sold is charged with the value assigned to trade-in units from the original transaction.

At the time of the transaction, the Company assesses whether the price associated with its revenue transactions is fixed and determinable and whether or not collection is reasonably assured. The Company assesses whether the price is fixed and determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction. Standard payment terms for domestic customers are 30 days from the invoice date. Distributor contracts provide standard payment terms of 60 days from the invoice date. The Company does not generally offer extended payment terms.

6

Table of Contents

The Company assesses collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the credit-worthiness of the customer. Collateral is not requested from customers. If it is determined that collection of an account receivable is not reasonably assured, the amount of the account receivable is deferred and revenue is recognized at the time collection becomes reasonably assured.

Most sales arrangements do not generally include acceptance clauses. However, if a sales arrangement includes an acceptance clause, acceptance occurs upon the earlier of receipt of a written customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance period.

Computation of Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented. For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, diluted loss per share does not include the effect of incremental shares from common stock equivalents using the treasury stock method, as the inclusion of such equivalents would be anti-dilutive. The total incremental shares from common stock equivalents were 37,283,183 and 937,292 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 2004, respectively. The total incremental shares from common stock equivalents at March 31, 2005, included 55,187 from outstanding stock options and 37,228,006 shares that are issuable pursuant to the conversion feature of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note held by Optel Capital, LLC. The table below shows the calculation of basic weighted average common shares outstanding and the incremental number of shares arising from common stock equivalents under the treasury stock method:

Stock Based Compensation

At March 31, 2005, the Company had two stock-based employee compensation plans. The Company accounts for the plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net loss resulting from option grants made to employees as all options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The stock-based compensation recorded in 2005 resulted from options issued to non-employee contractors. The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation:

7

Table of Contents

During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 482,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average exercise price of approximately $1.05 per share. These options, which vest quarterly over three years, were granted to employees and directors under the Digital Lightwave, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement on Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123 (Revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (“No. 123R”). SFAS No. 123R addresses all forms of share-based payment (“SBP”) awards, including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. SFAS No. 123R will require the Company to expense SBP awards with compensation cost for SBP transactions measured at fair value. The FASB originally stated a preference for a lattice model because it believed that a lattice model more fully captures the unique characteristics of employee stock options in the estimate of fair value, as compared to the Black-Scholes model that the Company currently uses for its footnote disclosure. The FASB decided to remove its explicit preference for a lattice model and not require a single valuation methodology. SFAS No. 123R requires the Company to adopt the new accounting provisions either prospectively or retrospectively beginning in the first quarter of 2006. The Company has not yet determined either the method or the impact of applying the various provisions of SFAS No. 123R.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, which is effective for inventory costs incurred by the Company beginning fiscal year 2006. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 will improve financial reporting by clarifying that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and by requiring the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have a significant effect on its financial statements.

In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. This statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. This statement eliminates the exception to fair value for exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchange transactions that do not have commercial substance – that is, transactions that are not expected to result in significant changes in the cash flows of the reporting entity. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have a significant effect on its financial statements.

8

Table of Contents

2. INVENTORIES

Inventories are summarized as follows:

In December 2001, the Company signed a manufacturing service agreement with Jabil, a leading provider of technology manufacturing services with a customer base of industry-leading companies. Under the terms of the agreement, Jabil purchased the Company’s existing inventory to fulfill orders until the Company’s inventory was depleted to safety stock levels. Under the terms of the agreement, Jabil served as the Company’s primary contract manufacturer for the Company’s circuit board and product assembly and provided engineering design services.

On May 11, 2004, the Company and Jabil entered into a settlement agreement to resolve and settle certain disputes between the Company and Jabil, and Jabil agreed to continue to provide manufacturing services to the Company. As previously reported, on February 27, 2003, Jabil terminated the manufacturing services agreement and on March 19, 2003, commenced an arbitration proceeding against the Company seeking damages in excess of $6.8 million. On December 5, 2003, the Company entered into a manufacturing services letter agreement with Jabil specifying the terms under which Jabil would provide the Company with certain manufacturing services. The manufacturing services letter agreement expired on December 30, 2003, and the term of such letter agreement was extended through December 31, 2004. Jabil continued to provide manufacturing services during the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

Effective as of January 31, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with MC Test Service, Inc. (“MC”) to also provide outsourced manufacturing services. On March 15, 2005, Optel established an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $6.0 million on behalf of the Company and naming MC as beneficiary.

The Company has established reserves for excess and obsolete inventory based upon current and expected sales trends, the amount of parts on-hand, the market value of parts on-hand and the viability and technical obsolescence of products and components.

3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company from time to time may be involved in various lawsuits and actions by third parties arising in the ordinary course of business. As of the date of this report, the Company is not aware of any pending litigation, claims or assessments that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

4. COMMITMENTS

At March 31, 2005, the Company had non-cancelable purchase order commitments to purchase certain inventory items totaling approximately $1.5 million, with approximately $1.0 million of those purchase order commitments placed with MC Test Service, Inc. and approximately $469,000 placed with Jabil in conjunction with contract manufacturing services.

5. REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY

In April 2002, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wachovia Bank (the “Bank”). The terms of the Agreement provided the Company with a $27.5 million line of credit at LIBOR plus 0.7% collateralized by the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The advance rate varied between 80% and 95% and was dependent upon the composition and maturity of the available collateral. An availability fee of 0.10% per annum was payable quarterly based on the Average Available Principal Balance (as defined in the Agreement) for such three months. The Agreement had an initial term of three years. The Agreement could have been terminated by the Company at any time upon at least fifteen days prior written notice to the Bank, and the Bank had the right to terminate the Agreement at any time, without notice upon or after the occurrence of an event of default. As of March 31, 2005, and March 31, 2004, the Company had no borrowings under the Bank line of credit. The Agreement expired on April 15, 2005.

9

Table of Contents

6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Note Receivable

On February 15, 2005, in conjunction with a severance agreement between the Company and James R. Green, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company agreed to forgive the entire amount of a note receivable from Mr. Green of approximately $374,000, including approximately $7,700 of accrued interest. Further, the Company agreed to release all collateral held as security against such note, including a second lien on Mr. Green’s residence. The costs associated with the forgiveness of the note and the severance agreement were reported as general and administrative expenses in the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

The loan to Mr. Green originated in February 2001 in the amount of $200,000, had a stated interest rate of the prime rate plus one percent and was payable on demand or, if earlier, from the proceeds of any sale of Mr. Green’s stock holdings in the Company or on the date of termination of Mr. Green’s employment. The loan was collateralized by Mr. Green’s stock holdings in the Company and any future cash bonuses.

In April 2002, Mr. Green borrowed an additional $175,000 from the Company. The loan was combined with the previous note of $200,000 plus accrued interest of approximately $16,000 into one note with a principal balance of approximately $391,000, and was classified in notes receivable. The note bore a rate of interest of 8% per annum, was payable on demand or, if earlier, from the proceeds of any sale of Mr. Green’s stock holdings in the Company or on the date of termination of Mr. Green’s employment. The loan was collateralized by Mr. Green’s stock holdings in the Company, any future cash bonuses and a second lien on Mr. Green’s residence.

Effective August 1, 2003, $50,000 a year of Mr. Green’s annual salary was used to repay the April 2002 note discussed above. The repayment was deducted proportionally each pay period and was applied first to accrued interest. As of December 31, 2004, the outstanding balance, reflecting a voluntary principal prepayment of $25,000 made during the fourth quarter of 2002 and regular monthly payments beginning August 2003, was approximately $366,000 exclusive of accrued interest of approximately $10,300.

As described in Note 1 under the paragraph entitled “Operational Matters,” since February 2003 and through the May 9, 2005, the Company has borrowed approximately $41.3 million from Optel, an entity controlled by the Company’s largest stockholder and current chairman of the board of directors, Dr. Bryan J. Zwan, of which approximately $38.2 in principal and $3.1 million in accrued and unpaid interest remain outstanding.

Also as described in Note 1 under the paragraph entitled “Operational Matters,” Optel has provided additional working capital financing in the form of letters of credit totaling approximately $7.4 million, with vendors of the Company named as beneficiaries, and a guarantee of certain obligations of the Company up to approximately $1.88 million under a guarantee agreement.

7. NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, Optel elected to convert a total of $1.0 million of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note into 981,258 shares of common stock of the Company, reducing accrued interest payable by $1.0 million and increasing additional paid-in capital by the same amount. The number of shares issued increased common stock by $98.00.

Further, also during the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company forgave the notes receivable outstanding balance of $374,000 from Mr. James R. Green, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, as part of his severance arrangements (see Note 6 - Related Party Transactions).

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company incurred deferred compensation expenses associated with stock option grants made to non-employee contractors of approximately $12,000. The Company did not incur any deferred compensation expenses associated with stock option grants during the three months ended March 31, 2004.

8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

As described in Note 1 under the paragraph entitled “Operational Matters,” on April 14, 2005, and April 28, 2005, the Company borrowed an additional $375,000, and $600,000, respectively, from Optel to fund its ongoing working capital needs. Each of the new loans were evidenced by separate secured promissory notes, bear a rate of interest of 10.0% per annum and are secured by a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets.

10

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

The following discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should, expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, potential or continue, the negative of terms like these or other comparable terminology. Additionally, statements concerning future matters such as the development of new products, enhancements or technologies, possible changes in legislation and other statements regarding matters that are not historical are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. These statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual events or results to differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us on the date of filing, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including the risks outlined under the caption “Factors That May Affect Future Results” set forth at the end of Item 1 of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and those contained from time to time in our other filings with the SEC. We caution you that our business and financial performance are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties.

This information should be read in conjunction with (i) the consolidated condensed financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of Part I of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and (ii) the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, as well as the accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations, for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 included in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K.

OVERVIEW

Executive Summary

The Company has insufficient short-term resources for the payment of its current liabilities. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company has addressed this shortfall by obtaining financing from Optel Capital, LLC (“Optel”), an entity controlled by the Company’s largest stockholder and current chairman of the board of directors, Dr. Bryan J. Zwan. Our ability to meet cash requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity over the next 12 months is dependent on our ability to obtain additional financing from funding sources which may include, but may not be limited to, Optel. If the Company is not able to obtain additional financing, it expects that it will not have sufficient cash to fund its working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the near term. Optel currently is and continues to be the principal source of financing for the Company. Further, the Company has not identified any funding source other than Optel that would be prepared to provide current or future financing to the Company.

The Company cannot assure that it will be able to obtain adequate financing, that it will achieve profitability or, if it achieves profitability that the profitability will be sustainable or that it will continue as a going concern.

Overview

The Company designs, develops and markets a portfolio of portable and network-based products for installing, maintaining and monitoring fiber optic circuits and networks. Network operators and telecommunications service providers use fiber optics to provide increased network bandwidth to transmit voice and other non-voice traffic such as internet, data and multimedia video transmissions. The Company provides telecommunications service providers and equipment manufacturers with product capabilities to cost-effectively deploy and manage fiber optic networks. The Company’s product lines include Network Information Computers (“NIC”), Network Access Agents (“NAA”), Optical Test Systems (“OTS”), and Optical Wavelength Managers (“OWM”). The Company’s products are sold worldwide to leading and emerging telecommunications service providers, telecommunications equipment manufacturers, equipment leasing companies and international distributors.

The Company’s net sales are generated from sales of its products less an estimate for customer returns. We expect that the average selling price (“ASP”) of our products will fluctuate based on a variety of factors, including market demand, product configuration, potential volume discounts to customers, the timing of new product introductions and enhancements and the introduction of competitive products. Because the cost of goods sold tends to remain relatively stable for any given product, fluctuations in the ASP may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

11

Table of Contents

For the three months ended March 31, 2005, a single customer accounted for approximately 34% of total net sales. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of net sales.

The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of products when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, the price is fixed and determinable and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. When selling through a distributor to an end-user customer, we either obtain an end-user purchase order documenting the order placed with the distributor or proof of delivery to the end-user as evidence that a sales arrangement exists. No revenue is recognized on products shipped on a trial basis. We believe that our accrued warranty reserve is sufficient to meet our responsibilities for potential future warranty work on products sold.

The Company has not entered into long-term agreements or blanket purchase orders for the sale of its products. It generally obtains purchase orders for immediate shipment. The Company does not expect to carry substantial backlog from quarter to quarter. Our sales during a particular quarter are highly dependent upon orders placed by customers during that quarter. Most of our operating expenses are fixed and cannot be easily reduced in response to decreased revenues. Variations in the timing of revenues could cause significant variations in results of operations from quarter to quarter and result in continuing quarterly losses. The deferral of any large order from one quarter to another would negatively affect the results of operations for the earlier quarter. The Company must obtain orders during each quarter for shipment in that quarter to achieve revenue and profit objectives.

In order to maintain our market share, we are focused on maintaining technological leadership with our product lines. We have evaluated our sales efforts to identify opportunities where our account presence can be improved and are working to exploit those opportunities. Subject to resolution of our working capital constraints, we are seeking new applications for our installed product base to be realized with use of new modular add-ons and enhancements. We also established channel partners such as independent sales representatives and distributors to complement our sales force.

We are concentrating on the products and technologies that we believe are most important to our customers. Subject to resolution of our working capital constraints, we plan to introduce enhancements to our product lines to support the telecommunications network evolution of the next generation protocols and services. These plans include the introduction of enhancements that support the convergence of the telecommunications and data communications networks and enhance our data communications network analysis capabilities. These enhancements will position us to meet growing global needs including global high-speed data service requirements.

During the fourth quarter of 2002, we acquired certain assets related to the OWM product line of LightChip, Inc., a Salem, New Hampshire-based provider of components and subsystems for optical networks. Since that time, we have complemented the OWM product line of remote wavelength management solutions for dense wavelength division multiplexed (“DWDM”) systems with our own NAA product line for centralized network testing and monitoring.

We believe that these new products and product enhancements, strategic partnerships, and third-party distribution agreements will further complement our product portfolio and enable us to offer a broader range of products to our global customers.

On November 5, 2002 we acquired certain assets related to the OTS product line of Tektronix, Inc. Since the acquisition, we have integrated this technology into our NIC product line. The value of these assets has been substantially written off.

Critical Accounting Estimates

We believe that estimating valuation allowances and accrued liabilities are critical in that they are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and they require difficult, subjective and complex judgments that are often the result of estimates that are inherently uncertain. Specifically, we believe the following estimates to be critical:

12

Table of Contents

We make significant judgments, estimates and assumptions in connection with establishing the above-mentioned valuation allowances. If we made different judgments or used different estimates or assumptions for establishing such amounts, it is likely that the amount and timing of our revenue or operating expenses for any period would be materially different.

We estimate the amount of potential future product returns related to current period product revenue. We consider many factors when making our estimates, including analyzing historical returns, current economic trends, changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products to evaluate the adequacy of the sales returns and other allowances. Our estimate for the provision for sales returns and other allowances as of March 31, 2005, was approximately $285,000.

We also estimate the collectability of our accounts receivables. We consider many factors when making our estimates, including analyzing accounts receivable and historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the reserve for uncollectible accounts. This reserve was reduced by approximately $545,000 during the first quarter of 2005 as a result of an anticipated product return and the corresponding reversal of an account receivable that had aged beyond 120 days. Our accounts receivable balance as of March 31, 2005, was $1.4 million, net of our estimated reserve for uncollectible accounts of approximately $145,000.

We estimate the amount of excess and obsolete inventory. When evaluating the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory, we consider many factors, including analyzing current and expected sales trends, the amount of current parts on hand, the current market value of parts on hand and the viability and technical obsolescence of our products. The assumptions made relative to expected sales trends are subjective in nature and have a material impact on the estimate of the reserve requirement. Should future sales trends, in total or by product line, fluctuate from that used in our estimates, this reserve could be overstated or understated. Our inventory balance was $6.4 million as of March 31, 2005, net of our estimated reserve for excess and obsolete inventory of $16.1 million.

We estimate the impairment of long-lived assets. We monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. These events and circumstances include any decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset, changes in the manner in which a long-lived asset is used, changes in legal factors and a current-period operating loss or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating losses or cash flow losses or a forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of long-lived assets. When such an event or changes in circumstance occur, we assess the recoverability of long-lived assets by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through undiscounted expected future cash flows. We recognize impairments when there is an excess of the assets carrying value over the fair value as estimated using a discounted expected future cash flows model. In estimating undiscounted expected future cash flows, we must make judgments and estimates related to future sales and profitability. Should future sales trends or profitability be significantly less than that forecasted, our impairment could be understated. We could be required to take an additional impairment charge in the future should our actual cash flows be less than forecasted. As of March 31, 2005 a review of the carrying value of our long-lived assets and the probability of recovering such value indicated that no additional impairment charge was required.

We estimate the amount of our warranty reserve. We consider many factors when making our estimate, including historical trends, the number of products under warranty, the costs of replacement parts and the expected reliability of our products. We believe that our accrued warranty reserve is sufficient to meet our responsibilities for potential future warranty work on products sold. Our accrued warranty reserve as of March 31, 2005 was approximately $619,000.

We estimate the amount of liability the Company may incur as a result of pending litigation. As of March 31, 2005, the Company was not aware of any pending litigation, claims or assessments. Accordingly, there is no accrual for pending litigation at March 31, 2005.

13

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is a discussion of significant changes in the results of operations of the Company which occurred in the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. The following sets forth certain financial data as a percent of net sales:

Net Sales

Net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, decreased $1.5 million, or 35%, to $2.9 million from $4.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The decease in net sales primarily reflects the impact of more stringent credit policies applied by the Company, particularly with international customers. International net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, were approximately $813,000 or 28.4% of net sales as compared to approximately $1.6 million, or 36% of net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, totaled approximately $1.6 million or 55% of net sales as compared to $2.3 million or 51% of net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. For the quarter ended March 31, 2005, cost of goods sold was lower due to the lower comparable net sales volume in the period. The higher percentage of cost of goods sold to net sales reflects a larger component of purchased equipment shipped with the Company’s product in 2005. Purchased equipment sold with the Company’s product generally has a lower relative sales price mark-up and, consequently, a higher cost ratio relative to net sales.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, declined by approximately $846,000 to approximately $1.3 million or 45% of net sales, from a gross profit of $2.1 million or 55% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Gross profit declined from the prior period reflecting the lower net sales volume and as a result of the larger component of purchased equipment shipped with the Company’s product in 2005. Purchased equipment sold with the Company’s product generally has a lower relative sales price mark-up and, consequently, a higher cost ratio relative to net sales resulting in a lower gross profit and related margins.

Engineering and Development

Engineering and development expenses principally include salaries for engineering and development personnel, depreciation of production and development assets, outside consulting fees and other development expenses. Engineering and development expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, increased by approximately $1.1 million to $2.6 million from approximately $1.5

14

Table of Contents

million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The increased spending in the quarter ended March 31, 2005, reflects additional investment in product development through an increase in the engineering staff, the use of contract engineering services and purchases of materials and equipment to support development activity.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses principally include salaries, commissions, travel, tradeshows and promotional materials, depreciation of demonstration units, bad debt and warranty expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, were $2.7 million, an increase of approximately $895,000 over the quarter ended March 31, 2004, spending of $1.8 million. The increase over the first quarter of 2004 is primarily attributable to an increase sales staff, travel and a comparative increase in warranty cost. During the first quarter of 2004, a $72,000 adjustment to the warranty reserve to reflect a reduced number of units under warranty at that time resulted in a corresponding, one-time reduction in warranty expense that was reported as part of sales and marketing expenses.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses principally include salaries, other compensation, professional fees, facility rentals and information systems related to general management functions. General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, increased by approximately $725,000 to $1.6 million from approximately $901,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The increase represents one-time expenditures, including severance and debt forgiveness costs, approximating $424,00 following the resignation of the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer James R. Green in February 2005, and approximately $78,000 in expenses for the Special Meeting of Stockholders held during the first quarter of 2005. Other increases from the first quarter of 2004 include additional spending on staff and outside professional fees.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company did not record a non-cash asset impairment charge during the three months ended March 31, 2005, as there were no events which occurred that required a measurement for impairment during that period.

Other Income and Expense, net

Other expense, net for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was approximately $846,000 as compared to other expense, net of approximately $379,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The increase of approximately $467,000 is primarily attributable to the increased interest expense to approximately $840,000 million for the quarter reflecting increased debt levels.

Provision for Income Taxes

No provision for income taxes was made for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2005 and 2004 due to the Company’s expected annual net losses. Any tax benefits resulting from the Company’s net loss have not been recognized due to a full valuation allowance for deferred tax assets being recorded as a result of management’s belief it is more likely than not that future tax benefits will not be realized as a result of future income.

Net Loss

Net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was approximately $6.4 million or $0.19 per diluted share compared with net loss of approximately $2.5 million or $0.08 per diluted share for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, for the reasons discussed above.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of March 31, 2005, the Company’s unrestricted cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $373,000, a decrease of approximately $436,000 from December 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005, the Company’s working capital deficit was $37.3 million as compared to a working capital deficit of $31.9 million at December 31, 2004. The Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $121.7 million at March 31, 2005.

Beginning in the third quarter of 2001 and continuing through March 31, 2005, the Company experienced combined net losses of approximately $134.7 million. The Company expects to continue to incur operating losses in fiscal year 2005. Management has taken actions to reduce operating expenses and capital expenditures. The actions include restructuring operations to more closely align operating costs with revenue. As further discussed below, our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity in the future is dependent on raising additional capital, successfully negotiating extended payment terms with certain vendors and other creditors, maintaining tight controls over spending, successfully achieving our product release schedules and attaining our forecasted sales objectives.

15

Table of Contents

The Company continues to have insufficient short-term resources for the payment of its current liabilities. During the first three months of 2005, the Company has addressed this shortfall by obtaining financing from Optel Capital, LLC (“Optel”), an entity controlled by the Company’s largest stockholder and current chairman of the board of directors, Dr. Bryan J. Zwan. The Company has used the financing provided by Optel to fund (i) the satisfaction of substantially all of its outstanding debt and liabilities owed to creditors other than Optel, and (ii) the Company’s short-term working capital needs.

As of May 9, 2005, we owed Optel approximately $38.2 million in principal plus accrued interest thereon, which debt is secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of our assets and such debt accrues interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The maturity dates and corresponding payment schedules related to these obligations are as follows:

On February 10, 2005, at a special meeting of our stockholders, the conversion feature of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note was approved by our stockholders. Accordingly, all or any portion of such debt is convertible into our common stock at the option of Optel at any time. The conversion price is based upon the volume-weighted average trading price of our common stock during the five-day period preceding the date of any conversion.

All of the foregoing transactions with Optel were approved by the Company’s board of directors, upon the recommendation of a special committee of the board. The special committee is composed solely of independent directors.

On March 11, 2005, we issued 981,258 shares of common stock to Optel in connection with Optel’s conversion of $1.0 million of the indebtedness outstanding under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note. As of May 9, 2005, the aggregate outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note was approximately $29.7 million, and the Applicable Conversion Price was approximately $0.418. Accordingly, on May 9, 2005, Optel had the right to convert the Secured Convertible Promissory Note into an aggregate of 70,954,316 shares of common stock. Further conversion by Optel of all or any portion of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note could significantly dilute the ownership interests of our other stockholders, and give Optel and Dr. Zwan even greater control over the Company.

On August 23, 2004, Optel entered into a guarantee agreement (the “Guarantee Agreement”) with Jabil, pursuant to which Optel guaranteed certain obligations of the Company owing to Jabil relating to purchase orders for production material issued by the Company to Jabil after June 30, 2004. Optel’s maximum obligation under the Guarantee Agreement is $1.88 million. Prior to the completion of the Guarantee Agreement, the Company was required to prepay Jabil for all orders of production material. With the Guarantee Agreement in place, the Company is now able to pay for production material purchased from Jabil upon receipt of that material.

On March 15, 2005, Optel established an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $6.0 million on our behalf and naming MC Test Service, Inc. as beneficiary. MC Test Service, Inc. provides outsourced manufacturing services to us. With the letter of credit in place, MC Test Service, Inc. has extended to us regular payment terms to pay for purchased production material. The letter of credit expires on December 30, 2005.

16

Table of Contents

We have entered into preliminary discussions with Optel to restructure the Short-Term Notes by extending the maturity date of such debt, to arrange for additional short-term working capital and to obtain additional financing through guarantees and letters of credit to secure vendor obligations. If we do not reach an agreement to restructure the Short-Term Notes and obtain additional financing from Optel, we will be unable to meet our obligations to Optel and our other creditors, and in an attempt to collect payment, our creditors, including Optel, may seek legal remedies.

The Company’s ability to meet cash requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity over the next 12 months is dependent on its ability to obtain additional financing from funding sources which may include, but may not be limited to, Optel. If the Company is not able to obtain additional financing, it expects that it will not have sufficient cash to fund its working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the near term. Optel currently continues to be the principal source of financing for the Company. Further, the Company has not identified any funding source other than Optel that would be prepared to provide current or future financing to the Company.

The Company cannot assure that it will be able to obtain adequate financing, that it will achieve profitability or, if it achieves profitability that the profitability will be sustainable or that it will continue as a going concern. As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph for a going concern in its report for the year ended December 31, 2004, that was included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 30, 2005.

Operating Activities

Net cash used by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was approximately $5.9 million. This was primarily the result of the loss from operations of approximately $6.4 million, offset by a reduction in accounts receivable of approximately $698,000 and an increase in accounts payable of approximately $979,000. An increase in inventory of approximately $1.1 million and an increase in prepaid expenses and other assets of approximately $744,000 used operating cash in the quarter. The decrease in net receivables, following an increase in net sales on a consecutive quarter basis of approximately $1.8 million, reflects more stringent credit and collection policies, with emphasis on strengthening performance of international accounts. Additionally, the bad debt reserve was reduced by approximately $545,000 to $145,000 in the quarter as a result of product returns that were anticipated and accrued for at December 31, 2004. Forgiveness of a related party note receivable provided approximately $374,000 of operating cash for the three months ended March 31, 2005, while the decrease in the provision for excess and obsolete inventory of approximately $125,000 and the gain on debt settlement of approximately $53,000 used operating cash flow during the quarter. The cash provided by accounts payable and accrued expenses totaled approximately $979,000 and resulted primarily from accrued but unpaid interest expenses totaling approximately $840,000.

Investing Activities

Net cash used by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was approximately $175,000. This was primarily the result of purchases of property and equipment during the quarter.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was approximately $5.6 million. This was primarily the result of proceeds of $5.8 million from borrowings from Optel, offset by payments of $154,000 made on notes payable to Jabil in conjunction with the settlement agreement made with Jabil in May 2004.

Revolving Credit Facility

In April 2002, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wachovia Bank (the “Bank”). The terms of the Agreement provided the Company with a $27.5 million line of credit at LIBOR plus 0.7% collateralized by the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The advance rate varied between 80% and 95% and was dependent upon the composition and maturity of the available collateral. An availability fee of 0.10% per annum was payable quarterly based on the Average Available Principal Balance (as defined in the Agreement) for such three months. The Agreement had an initial term of three years. The Agreement could have been terminated by the Company at any time upon at least fifteen days prior written notice to the Bank, and the Bank had the right to terminate the Agreement at any time, without notice upon or after the occurrence of an event of default. As of March 31, 2005, and March 31, 2004, the Company had no borrowings under the Bank line of credit. The Agreement expired on April 15, 2005.

17

Table of Contents

Legal Proceedings

The Company from time to time may be involved in various lawsuits and actions by third parties arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not aware of any pending litigation, claims or assessments that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are not exposed to material fluctuations in currency exchange rates because the majority of our sales and expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars. We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes on our restricted cash investments, consisting of U.S. Treasury obligations and other investments in institutions with the highest credit ratings, all of which have maturities of three months or less. These short-term investments carry a degree of interest rate risk. We believe that the impact of a 10% increase or decline in interest rates would not be material to our investment income.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of March 31, 2005. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that (1) information to be disclosed in reports we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the rules and forms promulgated under the Exchange Act and (2) information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the principal executive officer and principal financial officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. In conjunction with our procedures to implement the documentation and internal control requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we will initiate corrective actions to address internal control deficiencies, and will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and internal controls and procedures on an ongoing basis, taking corrective action as appropriate.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

The Company from time to time may be involved in various other lawsuits and actions by third parties arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not aware of any additional pending litigation, claims or assessments that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On March 11, 2005, the Company issued 981,258 shares of the Company’s common stock to Optel Capital, LLC (“Optel”) in connection with Optel’s conversion of $1.0 million of the indebtedness outstanding under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $27.0 million that was issued to Optel by the Company on September 16, 2004. The portion of the indebtedness that was converted consisted of accrued and unpaid interest. Such shares were issued in accordance with the exemption from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, since such issuance was a transaction not involving a public offering.

As of May 9, 2005, the aggregate outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note was approximately $29.7 million, and the Applicable Conversion Price was approximately $0.417. Accordingly, on May 9, 2005, Optel had the right to convert the Secured Convertible Promissory Note into an aggregate of 71,112,695 shares of Common Stock. Further conversion by Optel of all or any portion of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note could significantly dilute the ownership interests of our other stockholders, and give Optel and Dr. Zwan even greater control over the Company.

18

Table of Contents

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

The following matters were approved at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders for the fiscal year 2003, held January 14, 2005.

Proposal 1 - Election of Directors:

Proposal 2 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors:

The following matters were approved at a Special Meeting of Stockholders, held February 10, 2005.

Proposal 1 - To approve amendments to the Company’s 2001 Stock Option Plan to:

Proposal 2 - To approve the conversion feature of the debt held by Optel Capital LLC and the issuance of Common Stock upon the possible conversion of such debt.

Proposal 3 - To approve an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, increasing the number of authorized shares of Common Stock of the Company to 300,000,000.

19

Table of Contents

Item 5. Other Information.

None

Item 6. Exhibits.

A list of exhibits is set forth in the Exhibit Index found on page 21 of this report.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

20

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

21