Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

OR

Commission file number 0-11303

SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (858) 451-3771

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of May 13, 2005, 33,822,033 shares of common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION

INDEX

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Synbiotics Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-1-

Table of Contents

Synbiotics Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) (unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-2-

Table of Contents

Synbiotics Corporation

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-3-

Table of Contents

SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 – Interim Financial Statements:

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005 and the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) and of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 have been prepared by Synbiotics Corporation (the “Company”) and have not been audited. The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiary Synbiotics Europe SAS (“SBIO-E”). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. These financial statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for all periods presented. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2004. Interim operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 2 – Going Concern:

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the consolidated financial statements, although profitable during the first quarter of 2005, the Company incurred a net loss of $647,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004 and had an accumulated deficit of $46,111,000 as of March 31, 2005.

The Company has a $1,000,000 contractual obligation due in July 2005, and another $1,500,000 contractual obligation, to the same party, due in July 2006. These obligations are recorded at their accreted value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under other current liabilities and other liabilities. The Company does not believe that its cash position will be sufficient to fund its operations and service its bank debt for the next twelve months if it also pays the $1,000,000 contractual obligation when it becomes due in July 2005. The contractual obligation is unsecured. In the event that the Company does not make the payment when it comes due, the $1,500,000 due in July 2006 becomes immediately due, and the entire $2,500,000 will begin bearing interest at 10.5%. The Company plans to renegotiate this unsecured debt; however, there can be no assurance that any such renegotiation will be successful.

These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

-4-

Table of Contents

SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 3 – Inventories:

Inventories consist of the following:

Note 4 – Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:

The Company has allocated all of its goodwill to its only reporting unit, which is also its only reportable segment (Note 8). There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill from December 31, 2003 to March 31, 2005.

Other intangible assets were as follows:

The weighted-average amortization periods for patents and licenses are 9 years and 10 years, respectively, and the weighted-average amortization period for total intangible assets is 9 years. Annual pretax amortization for other intangibles over the next five years (including the remaining nine months of 2005) is estimated to be as follows:

Note 5 – Preferred Stock Dividend:

On March 1, 2005, the Company declared a dividend on the Series C preferred stock, in the form of common stock with a value totaling $58,000, for dividends accrued and payable as of January 31, 2005. Redwood West Coast, LLC (“Redwood”), the majority holder of the Series C preferred stock, as permitted by the Certificate of Determination of the Series C preferred stock, elected for the holders of Series C preferred stock to receive a dividend in the form of shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of the cash dividends. As a result, the Company issued 452,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on March 2, 2005.

-5-

Table of Contents

SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 6 - Income (Loss) per Share:

The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) and share amounts used in the computations of income (loss) per share:

Weighted average options and warrants to purchase common stock as determined by the application of the treasury method and weighted average shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C preferred stock as determined by the if-converted method totaling 1,891,000 shares and 23,481,000 shares have been excluded from the shares used in computing diluted net income (loss) per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, as their effect is anti-dilutive.

On March 2, 2005, the Company issued 452,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of cash dividends (Note 5).

On April 6, 2005, Redwood converted 1,569 shares of the Company’s Series C preferred stock into 12,215,907 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Note 7 – Income Taxes:

The Company’s provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2005 is less than the amount expected by applying the Federal statutory rate to income before income taxes due to a net operating loss for the period, resulting from temporary differences in deductions for tax and financial reporting purposes, which resulted in a change in the Company’s valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.

-6-

Table of Contents

SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 8 – Segment Information and Significant Customers:

The Company has determined that it has only one reportable segment based on the fact that all of its products are animal health products. Although the Company sells diagnostic and instrument products, it does not base its business decision making on a product category basis.

The following are revenues for the Company’s diagnostic and instrument products:

The following are revenues and long-lived assets information by geographic area:

There were no sales to any one customer that totalled 10% or more of total revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

-7-

Table of Contents

SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 9 – Stock-Based Compensation:

The Company measures its stock-based employee compensation using the intrinsic value method. The following disclosures present as reported amounts, utilizing the intrinsic value method, and pro forma amounts, after applying the fair value method, related to stock-based awards made to employees that were outstanding as of March 31, 2005 and 2004:

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 123R, “Share-Based Payments” (“FAS 123R”). FAS 123R is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and its related implementation guidance.

FAS 123R requires that the cost of all awards of equity instruments made to employees in exchange for employment services be recorded at fair value on the grant date, and the cost charged to expense as the award vests. The determination of fair value is based upon option-pricing models (for example, Black-Scholes) adjusted for characteristics unique to the equity instrument.

The Company will be required to charge to expense the fair value of employee stock options which vest on or after January 1, 2006, and expects to record compensation expense related to unvested employee stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2005, as follows: 2006 - $67,000; 2007 - $46,000; 2008 - $9,000.

-8-

Table of Contents

The information contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains both historical financial information and forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are characterized by words such as “intend”, “plan”, “believe”, “will”, “would”, etc. Historical financial information may not be indicative of future financial performance. In fact, future financial performance may be materially different than the historical financial information presented herein. Moreover, the forward-looking statements about future business or future results of operations are subject to significant uncertainties and risks, including those detailed under the caption “Certain Risk Factors”, which could cause actual future results to differ materially from what is suggested by the forward-looking information.

Overview

We are still working to recover from the effects of our cash crisis in 2002. Our total revenues and net sales have been declining annually since 2000, although they were essentially flat in 2004 from 2003. We believe that our operations have stabilized and that, with continued attention to steady and careful execution of our turnaround business plan, we can increase shareholder value.

Our main challenge in 2005 will be to resolve our unsecured contractual obligations of $1,000,000 due in July 2005 and $1,500,000 due in July 2006, both to the same unrelated third party. We cannot afford to make these payments as scheduled. If we miss the July 2005 payment, the entire obligation will be accelerated and will begin bearing interest at 10.5%.

In September 2004, we successfully resolved a similar situation, where we were unable to pay at maturity (January 25, 2004) the remaining $4,804,000 principal amount of our loan from Comerica Bank. The resolution involved extension and amendment of the loan terms and the sale by Comerica of most of the loan to a company affiliated with Redwood West Coast, LLC, our majority shareholder.

Our auditors’ report on our 2004 financial statements contains a going-concern explanatory paragraph – a statement that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

The profitability of our canine heartworm diagnostic products has diminished due to competition from new entrants to the in-clinic canine heartworm diagnostics market, Heska and Agen. We believe their products infringed our U.S. patent in this area, and we separately sued them for patent infringement. Although we incurred significant litigation costs, the final settlements of these cases in 2003 and 2004 did not include barring their products from the market. Agen’s U.S. distributor appears to be following a price-cutting strategy, so this new competition is adversely affecting both our market share and our average selling price. In any event, our U.S. patent in this area expires in December 2005, and after then we would be unable to prevent any further additional competitors from entering this market.

We believe our results in 2005 and thereafter will benefit if we can avoid the heavy patent litigation expense we experienced in 2002, 2003 and, particularly, 2004. We currently are not involved in any litigation.

On April 19, 2005, we announced that we will seek shareholder approval for us to “go private.” Specifically, we are proposing a 1-for-2,000 reverse split of our common stock, with a payment in lieu of issuing fractional shares, followed by a 2,000-for-1 forward split of our common stock. The cash payment in lieu of fractional shares will be at the rate of $0.13 per pre-reverse-split share traceable to the fractional shares.

The purpose of the proposal is to reduce the number of our shareholders of record to below 300. This, in turn, will enable us under the applicable legal standards to elect to deregister our securities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “1934 Act”), thereby “going private.” We would deregister as soon as possible, in order to (i) eliminate the costs associated with preparing and filing documents under the 1934 Act with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, (ii) eliminate or reduce the costs and other burdens associated with being a 1934 Act registrant, including the costs of complying with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as to internal control over financial reporting, (iii) avoid the requirement of regular mandatory disclosure of financial information and management analyses, to the public but also to our competitors and commercial counterparties, even when such disclosure would be adverse to an objective of ours, (iv) reduce the costs of administering shareholder accounts and responding to shareholder requests, (v) provide liquidity to shareholders holding less than 2,000 pre-reverse-split shares of common stock, and (vi) provide

-9-

Table of Contents

greater flexibility in the management and governance of us. We believe the cost savings associated with “going private” would be a minimum of $245,000 in the first full year alone.

In order to finance the cash payment in lieu of fractional shares and defray some of the other expenses of the “going private” transaction, we have entered into an agreement to sell 180 newly issued and unregistered shares of Series C preferred stock to Redwood Holdings, LLC for $180,000 cash. Redwood Holdings, LLC is an affiliate of our controlling shareholder, Redwood West Coast, LLC, and our directors Thomas A. Donelan and Christopher P. Hendy. Any such sale of Series C preferred stock is contingent upon the shareholder approval of the proposed transaction. This equity investment to maintain cash levels is required by our lender Comerica Bank as a condition to its waiver of our covenant not to repurchase common stock.

Results of Operations

Our net sales for the first quarter of 2005 decreased by $156,000 or 3% from the first quarter of 2004. The decrease reflects a decrease in our diagnostic product sales of $114,000 and a decrease in our instrument product sales of $42,000, and also reflects a 5% increase in foreign currency exchange rates which affects the consolidation of SBIO-E and itself added $93,000 to our first quarter 2005 revenues. The decrease in sales of our diagnostic and instrument products is due primarily to the fact that in December 2004, one of our distributor customers placed an order totaling $546,000, which was shipped and invoiced in December 2004. The order represented approximately 50% of the customer’s prior twelve months purchases. We believed, at the time the order was placed, that due to the size of the order, the customer would not be placing any significant orders with us during the first quarter of 2005. In fact, sales to this customer in the first quarter of 2005 were only $82,000 as compared to $447,000 in the first quarter of 2004. Because the heartworm selling season straddles December and the first part of the next year, our year-to-year periodic results often vary as a result of such timing differences. The effect of the decrease in sales to this one distributor during the first quarter of 2005 was offset by a $143,000 increase in sales of our poultry diagnostic product, which are not sold through distributors, and a $66,000 decrease in rebates and a general price increase implemented in December 2004.

Agen Biomedical Ltd. (“Agen”), which entered the US. canine heartworm diagnostic market in the fourth quarter of 2003, is currently distributing its products in the U.S. through Vedco, a co-operative buying group. Several of the member-owners of this buying group also distribute our canine heartworm and other products, but have decided to promote Agen’s canine heartworm product instead of ours. Additionally, Agen’s distributors marketed the canine heartworm product with a price which is significantly less than previously established prices in this market. As a result, we have been forced to compete on price and our average selling price for our Witness^® canine heartworm product during the first quarter of 2005 was 12% less than that during the first quarter of 2004. We do not believe that this price erosion will be easily reversed, especially after our U.S. canine heartworm detection patent expires in late 2005.

We recognize revenue from product sales when title and risk of loss transfers to our customer, which is generally upon shipment. Amounts we charge to our customers for shipping and handling are included in our net sales. We provide promotional discounts and rebates to certain of our distributors. Based upon the structure of these rebate programs and our past history, we are able to accurately estimate the amount of rebates at the time of sale. These rebates are recorded as a reduction of our net sales. We recognize license fee revenue ratably over the license term when we have further performance obligations to our licensee. In the event that we have no further performance obligations to our licensee, we recognize license fee revenue upon receipt.

Our cost of sales as a percentage of our net sales was 40% during the first quarter of 2005 as compared to 48% during the first quarter of 2004. The decrease is due to an increase in the sales of products we manufacture, and which carry higher gross margins, as opposed to products which are manufactured for us. However, a significant portion of our manufacturing costs are fixed. Among our major products, our DiroCHEK^® canine heartworm diagnostic products are manufactured at our facilities, whereas our WITNESS^® in-clinic canine heartworm, feline leukemia, and canine parvovirus diagnostic products and our SCA 2000^TM instrument products are manufactured by third parties. We manufacture the key biological materials contained in our WITNESS^® canine heartworm, feline leukemia and canine parvovirus diagnostic products. In addition to affecting our gross margins, outsourcing of manufacturing renders us relatively more dependent on the third-party manufacturers.

Our research and development expenses decreased by $32,000 or 8% during the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2004. The decrease is a result of a $61,000 decrease in research and development expenses contracted by us from a third party, offset by an increase of $21,000 in laboratory supplies, and $8,000 directly reflecting an increase in foreign currency exchange rates over the first quarter of 2004 of 5%. The increase in the foreign currency exchange rates affects the consolidation of

-10-

Table of Contents

SBIO-E. Our research and development expenses as a percentage of our net sales were 8% during the first quarter of 2005 and 2004.

Our selling and marketing expenses increased by $170,000 or 15% during the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2004. The increase is primarily related to a $195,000 increase in payroll and benefits resulting from an increase in the size of our sales force, a $43,000 decrease in advertising and promotional costs, and an increase of $21,000 directly reflecting an increase in foreign currency exchange rates over the first quarter of 2004 of 5%. The increase in the foreign currency exchange rates affects the consolidation of SBIO-E. Our selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of our net sales were 26% and 22% during the first quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Our general and administrative expenses decreased by $379,000 or 24% during the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2004. The decrease is primarily due to a $381,000 decrease in legal expenses as we currently are not involved in any litigation, and a decrease of $25,000 in foreign currency transaction losses on payments from the U.S. to foreign suppliers, offset by an increase of $22,000 directly reflecting an increase in foreign currency exchange rates over the first quarter of 2004 of 5%. The increase in the foreign currency exchange rates affects the consolidation of SBIO-E. Our general and administrative expenses as a percentage of our net sales were 24% and 31% during the first quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 123R, “Share-Based Payments” (“FAS 123R”). FAS 123R is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and its related implementation guidance.

FAS 123R requires that the cost of all awards of equity instruments made to employees in exchange for employment services be recorded at fair value on the grant date, and the cost be charged to expense as the award vests. The determination of fair value is based upon option-pricing models (for example, Black-Scholes) adjusted for characteristics unique to the equity instrument.

We will be required to charge to expense the fair value of employee stock options which vest on or after January 1, 2006, and we expect to record compensation expense related to unvested employee stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2005, as follows: 2006 - $67,000; 2007 - $46,000; 2008 - $9,000.

Our royalty income during the first quarter of 2005 increased by $50,000 or 106% as compared to the first quarter of 2003. We became entitled to royalties under the June 2004 settlement of our patent litigation with Agen, and we are also entitled to royalties from Heska. Any future royalty income will, of course, depend on the other companies’ net sales, which tend to be at the expense of our own product sales; also, depressed pricing in the market will tend to reduce the other companies’ net sales and thus reduce our future royalty income.

Our net interest expense increased by $21,000 or 19% during the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2004. The increase is due to the 7.75% fixed rate on our note payable to Remington Capital, LLC (which had a principal balance of $3,720,000 as of March 31, 2005) and increases in the variable rate on our note payable to Comerica Bank.

We recognized a provision for income taxes of $9,000 during the first quarter of 2005 as compared to a provision for income taxes of $3,000 during the first quarter of 2004. Although we were profitable in the first quarter of 2005 compared to incurring a loss in the first quarter of 2004, we incurred a tax net operating loss for the period, resulting from temporary differences in deductions for tax and financial reporting purposes. The provision for income taxes for the first quarters of 2005 and 2004 represent minimum state income taxes.

A review of our business, in light of the market, reveals that our food animal diagnostics are not meeting their relative geographic sales potentials. Food animal diagnostics measure the health of herds or flocks and provide information for the economic management of herds or flocks. We currently manufacture all our poultry products at our San Diego, California facility and the majority of our livestock products at our Lyon, France facility. Both lines perform better in their local markets. Our intent is to better internationalize those portfolios. We are also developing, both internally and through in-licensing arrangements, new food animal diagnostic products that would expand and enhance our existing product line. These growth opportunities will necessitate additional expenses in research and development as well as improved marketing to effectively target this market if the development projects come to fruition successfully. In March 2005, we effected a two-person reduction in force at SBIO-E, in part as a result of this review. The reduction in force related to senior management positions. Due to severance costs associated with this reduction in force, the

-11-

Table of Contents

impact on our 2005 results of operations will be negligible. The savings from the reduction in force will be more readily evident in our 2006 results of operations.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

The following table summarizes the future cash payments related to our contractual obligations (other than trade payables) as of March 31, 2005 (amounts are in thousands):

As of March 31, 2005, we had working capital of $4,765,000. We have a $1,000,000 contractual obligation due in July 2005, and another $1,500,000 contractual obligation, to the same party, due in July 2006. We do not believe that our cash position will be sufficient to fund our operations and service our bank debt for the next twelve months if we also pay the $1,000,000 contractual obligation when it becomes due. The contractual obligation is unsecured. In the event that we do not make the payment when it comes due, the $1,500,000 due in July 2006 becomes immediately due, and the entire $2,500,000 will begin bearing interest at 10.5%. We plan on approaching the party to whom we owe these contractual obligations in an effort to enter into a payment arrangement; however, there can be no assurance that any such renegotiation will be successful. As a result, we may well require additional financing in the future, and there can be no assurance that such financing would be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. Because our stock price is low, any equity financing would significantly dilute current shareholders.

Our operations are moderately seasonal due to the sales of our canine heartworm diagnostic products. Our sales and profits have historically tended to be concentrated in the first half of the year, as our distributors prepare for the heartworm season by purchasing diagnostic products for resale to veterinarians. The operations of SBIO-E have reduced our seasonality as sales of their large animal diagnostic products tend to occur evenly throughout the year. In addition, sales of our SCA 2000^TM instruments and supplies and our poultry diagnostic products reduce our seasonality.

Certain Risk Factors

Our future operating results are subject to a number of factors, including:

We have a short-term obligation that we cannot afford to pay in accordance with its terms; we may need additional capital in the future

Our auditors’ report on our 2004 financial statements contains a going-concern explanatory paragraph.

As of March 31, 2005, we had working capital of $4,765,000. We have a $1,000,000 contractual obligation due in July 2005, and another $1,500,000 contractual obligation, to the same unrelated party, due in July 2006. We do not believe that our current working capital will be sufficient to fund our operations and service our bank debt for the next twelve months if we also pay the $1,000,000 contractual obligation when it becomes due. The contractual obligation is unsecured. In the event that we do not make the payment when it comes due, the $1,500,000 due in July 2006 becomes immediately due, and the entire $2,500,000 will begin bearing interest at 10.5%. We plan to renegotiate this unsecured debt; however, there can be no assurance that any such renegotiation will be successful. As a result, we may well require additional financing in the future, and there can be no assurance that such financing would be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. Because our stock price is low, any equity financing would significantly dilute current shareholders. We may also need to raise additional funds if our estimates of revenues, working capital and/or capital expenditure requirements change or prove inaccurate or in order for us to respond to unforeseen technological or marketing hurdles or to take advantage of unanticipated opportunities.

Further, our future capital requirements will depend on many factors beyond our control or ability to accurately estimate, including continued scientific progress in our product development programs, the cost of manufacturing scale-up, the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent claims, competing technological and market developments, and the cost of establishing effective sales and marketing arrangements. Such funds may not be available at the time or times needed, or available on terms acceptable to us. If adequate funds are not available, or are not available on acceptable terms, we

-12-

Table of Contents

may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, to develop new products, or to otherwise respond to competitive pressures. This inability could materially harm our business.

If we are unable to fully succeed in responding to competition in the canine heartworm market and in other business, it could also hinder our ability to obtain any other necessary additional capital and/or create sooner the need to obtain financing.

The market in which we operate is intensely competitive, especially with regard to our key canine heartworm diagnostic products, and many of our competitors are larger and more established

The market for animal health care products is extremely competitive. Companies in the animal health care market compete to develop new products, to market and manufacture products efficiently, to implement effective research strategies, and to obtain regulatory approval. Our current competitors include IDEXX Laboratories, a significantly larger company, Heska Corporation and Agen. These companies have greater financial, manufacturing, marketing, and research resources than we do. In addition, IDEXX Laboratories prohibits its distributors from selling competitors’ products, including ours. Further, additional competition could come from new entrants to the animal health care market. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete successfully in the future or that competition will not harm our business.

Our canine heartworm diagnostic products constituted 24% of our sales for the year ended December 31, 2004. In addition to our historic competition with IDEXX Laboratories, the sales leader in this product category, our sales have been substantially affected by Heska entering the market in 1999, and their benefiting from us being out of the market after Agen terminated our supply agreement. In October 2003, Agen also entered the market. Additional competition, including erosion of the average selling price, from Agen in this key market with this product has seriously damaged us. We could face renewed competition from other new competitors when our U.S. heartworm patent expires in December 2005.

Under our settlement with Agen in June 2004, we licensed Agen our U.S. heartworm patent. In addition we agreed to sell to Agen the same biological components as are used in our own Witness^® in-clinic canine heartworm and canine parvovirus diagnostic products. Agen is therefore able to manufacture and sell canine heartworm diagnostic and canine parvovirus products that are substantially the same as ours. If Agen were to have its in-clinic canine heartworm diagnostic products made by the same contract manufacturer as we use, it would further diminish our ability to distinguish our products in the marketplace and achieve satisfactory pricing.

As previously mentioned, as a result of Agen ceasing to contract manufacture our Witness^® products our sales were materially adversely affected in 2003 and 2004, and we believe that our sales could be materially adversely affected in 2005 and beyond if we are unable to fully succeed in reintroducing the alternate-source products into the market. There can be no assurances that we will be able to achieve our previous sales levels of these in-clinic products.

We may be unable to fully succeed in reintroducing our key Witness^® products

Agen was the contract manufacturer of certain of our Witness^® in-clinic diagnostic products, and Agen ceased supplying these products in April 2003. We have licensed the alternate-source Witness^® canine heartworm, feline leukemia virus and canine parvovirus products with the USDA (now supplied by another contract manufacturer), and we began selling the canine heartworm product in January 2004, the feline leukemia virus product in August 2004 and the canine parvovirus product in February 2005. In addition to the risks that the alternate-source products will experience quality issues, cannot be supplied reliably, etc., we cannot ensure that after our products have been off the market for several months we will necessarily be able to regain our previous market share and our previous price points.

We have a history of losses and an accumulated deficit

Although we were profitable in the first quarter of 2005 and for 2003, we had a loss in 2004, and we have had a history of annual losses. We have incurred a consolidated accumulated deficit of $46,111,000 at March 31, 2005. We may not achieve annual profitability again, and if we are profitable in the future there can be no assurance that profitability can be sustained.

We rely on third party distributors for a substantial portion of our sales

We have historically depended upon distributors for a large portion of our sales, and we may not have the ability to establish and maintain an adequate independent sales and marketing capability in any or all of our targeted markets. Distributor agreements render our sales exposed to the efforts of third parties who are not employees of Synbiotics and over whom we have no control.

-13-

Table of Contents

Their failure to generate significant sales of our products could materially harm our business. Reduction by these distributors of the quantity of our products which they distribute would materially harm our business. Also, the distributors are not bound to us by long-term agreements, and a decision by any major distributor to stop doing business with us could materially hurt our revenues. Agen is currently distributing its products through Vedco, a co-operative buying group. Several of the members/owners of this buying group also distribute our products, but have decided to promote Agen’s canine heartworm product instead of ours. IDEXX Laboratories’ prohibition against its distributors carrying competitors’ products, including ours, has made, and could continue to make, some distributors unavailable to us. In the past, we have lost major distributors to IDEXX Laboratories.

Our plan to “go private” may have adverse effects

In April 2005 we announced a plan to, subject to shareholder approval, “go private” and deregister our stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Not only would this render our shares almost entirely illiquid. The absence of a publicly traded vehicle might diminish our status in the commercial market, reduce our ability to raise additional capital in the future, and deprive us of compensation tools which may be necessary to recruit or retain valuable employees in the future.

We depend on key executives and personnel

Our future success will depend, to a significant extent, on the ability of our management to operate effectively, both individually and as a group. Competition for qualified personnel in the animal health care products industry is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. There are only a limited number of persons with the requisite skills to serve in those positions and it may become increasingly difficult to hire such persons. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel or the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel could harm our business.

We depend on third party manufacturers, and may experience problems in obtaining supplies of our key products

We contract for the manufacture of some of our products, including our Witness^® in-clinic canine heartworm, feline leukemia virus and canine parvovirus diagnostic products and our SCA 2000^TM instrument products. We also expect that some of our anticipated new products will be manufactured by third parties. In addition, some of the products manufactured for us by third parties are licensed to us by their manufacturers. There are a number of risks associated with our dependence on third-party manufacturers including:

If our third party manufacturers fail to supply us with an adequate number of finished products, our business would be significantly harmed. We have no long-term contracts or arrangements with any of our vendors that guarantee product availability, the continuation of particular payment terms or the extension of credit limits.

If we encounter delays or difficulties in our relationships with our manufacturers, the resulting problems could have a material adverse effect on us.

-14-

Table of Contents

As mentioned above, in 2003 Agen, the previous contract manufacturer of certain of our Witness^® in-clinic products, ceased to supply us with those products, and entered the market with competing products.

We rely on new and recent products

We rely to a significant extent on new and recently developed products, and expect that we will need to continue to introduce new products to be successful in the future. There can be no assurance that we will obtain and maintain market acceptance of our products. There can be no assurance that future products, including our alternate-source in-clinic diagnostic products, will meet applicable regulatory standards, be capable of being produced in commercial quantities at acceptable cost or be successfully commercialized.

There can be no assurance that new products can be manufactured at a cost or in quantities necessary to make them commercially viable. If we are unable to produce internally, or to contract for, a sufficient supply of our new products on acceptable terms, or if we should encounter delays or difficulties in our relationships with manufacturers, the introduction of new products would be delayed, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our canine heartworm business is moderately seasonal

Our operations are moderately seasonal due to the timing of sales of our canine heartworm diagnostic products. Our sales and profits have historically tended to be concentrated in the first half of the year as our distributors prepare for the heartworm season by purchasing diagnostic products for resale to veterinarians. One effect of this is a need to devote large amounts of cash to building canine heartworm diagnostic products inventory in preparation for the canine heartworm selling season at a time when our working capital is relatively low.

Any failure to adequately establish or protect our proprietary rights may adversely affect us, and our canine heartworm diagnostic patent expires in December 2005

We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, and trademark laws, trade secrets, and confidentiality and other contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. These measures afford only limited protection. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights in the U.S. or abroad may not be adequate and competitors may independently develop similar technologies. Our future success will depend in part on our ability to protect our proprietary rights and the technologies used in our principal products. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use trade secrets or other information that we regard as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States. Issued patents may not preserve our proprietary position. Even if they do, competitors or others may develop technologies similar to or superior to our own. If we do not enforce and protect our intellectual property, our business will be harmed. From time to time, third parties, including our competitors, have asserted patent, copyright, and other intellectual property rights to technologies that are important to us. We expect that we will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in the animal health care market increases.

The results of any litigated matter are inherently uncertain. Litigation is costly regardless of its outcome and can require significant management attention. In the event of an adverse result in any litigation with third parties that could arise in the future, we could be required to:

Licenses may not be available from any third party that asserts intellectual property claims against us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

-15-

Table of Contents

Also, because our patents and patent applications cover novel diagnostic approaches:

Because of this, our patent position could be vulnerable and our business could be materially harmed. In any event, our important United States canine heartworm diagnosis patent will expire in December 2005.

The U.S. patent application system also exposes us to risks. In the United States, the first party to make a discovery is granted the right to patent it and patent applications are generally maintained in secrecy for 18 months. For these reasons, we can never know if we are the first to discover particular technologies. Therefore, we can never be certain that our technologies will be patented and we could become involved in lengthy, expensive, and distracting disputes concerning whether we were the first to make the disputed discovery. Any of these events would materially harm our business.

Our business is regulated by the United States and various foreign governments

Our business is subject to substantial regulation by the United States government, most notably the United States Department of Agriculture, and the French government. In addition, our operations may be subject to future legislation and/or rules issued by domestic or foreign governmental agencies with regulatory authority relating to our business. There can be no assurance that we will continue to be in compliance with any of these regulations.

For marketing outside the United States, we and our suppliers are subject to foreign regulatory requirements, which vary widely from country to country. There can be no assurance that we and our suppliers will meet and sustain compliance with any such requirements.

Redwood controls us

The common stock and Series C preferred stock owned by Redwood represents a majority of the voting power of all our stock. Redwood can, and does, control the election of our entire Board of Directors, and also controls all fundamental strategic decisions. In addition, an affiliate of Redwood acquired from Comerica Bank a $3,873,000 note issued by us and secured by our assets. At March 31, 2005, the outstanding balance on this note was $3,720,000. Our ability to negotiate effectively with the note holder, if such negotiation were ever to be necessary or desirable, might be compromised by Redwood’s multifaceted control of us.

We use hazardous materials

Our business requires that we store and use hazardous materials and chemicals. Although we believe that our procedures for storing, handling, and disposing of these materials comply with the standards prescribed by local, state, and federal regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials cannot be completely eliminated. If any of these materials were mishandled, or if an accident with them occurred, the consequences could be extremely damaging and we could be held liable for them. Our liability for such an event would materially harm our business and could exceed all of our available resources for satisfying it.

Our market risk consists primarily of the potential for changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk

The fair value of our long-term debt at March 31, 2005 was approximately $4,265,000, of which $545,000 has a variable interest rate based on the prime rate. A change in interest rates of five percentage points would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows as it relates to our variable rate debt.

-16-

Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Our foreign currency exchange rate risk relates to the operations of SBIO-E as it transacts business in Euros, its local currency. However, this risk is limited to our intercompany receivable from SBIO-E and the conversion of its financial statements into the U.S. dollar for consolidation. There is no additional foreign currency exchange rate risk related to SBIO-E’s transactions outside of the European Union as those transactions are generally denominated in Euros. Similarly, all of the foreign transactions of our U.S. operations are denominated in U.S. dollars. We do not generally hedge our cash flows on intercompany transactions, nor do we hold any other significant derivative securities or hedging instruments based on currency exchange rates. As a result, the effects of a 5% change in exchange rates would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, but only to the extent that it relates to the conversion of SBIO-E’s financial statements, including its intercompany payable to us, into the U.S. dollar for consolidation. For example, the 5% change in the value of the euro over the dollar as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, resulted in a $93,000 increase in our revenues, a $101,000 increase in our expenses, a $223,000 decrease in our assets and a $80,000 decrease in our liabilities (other than shareholders’ equity). In the first quarter of 2005, 40% of our net sales were net sales of SBIO-E.

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)), have concluded that, as of March 31, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

None.

See Item 5 below.

On the date of filing this report, a cumulative dividend arrearage of $29,000 existed on our Series C preferred stock.

None.

On March 1, 2005, the Company declared a dividend on the Series C preferred stock, in the form of common stock with a value totaling $58,000, for dividends accrued and payable as of January 31, 2005. Redwood West Coast, LLC (“Redwood”), the majority holder of the Series C preferred stock, as permitted by the Certificate of Determination of the Series C preferred stock, elected for the

-17-

Table of Contents

holders of Series C preferred stock to receive a dividend in the form of shares of the Company’s common stock in lieu of the cash dividends. As a result, the Company issued 452,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on March 2, 2005.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

-18-

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

EXHIBITS

TO

FORM 10-Q

UNDER

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX