Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

OR

COMMISSION FILE # 0-23969

POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by the Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).    Yes  ¨    No  x.

There were 4,641,717 shares of Common Stock ($0.01 par value) issued and outstanding as of April 25, 2005.

Table of Contents

POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

Item 1

POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (UNAUDITED)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)

(Continued)

2

Table of Contents

POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)

(Concluded)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Continued)

5

Table of Contents

POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Concluded)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The condensed consolidated statement of financial condition information at September 30, 2004 was derived from the audited balance sheet of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”), at September 30, 2004. The condensed consolidated financial statements at and for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are unaudited. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation 10 of Regulation S-X. Certain information required for a complete presentation in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles has been omitted. All adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any interim period.

The interim financial information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes of the Company, including a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Company, included in the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiary, First Community Bank (the “Bank”); as well as the Bank’s subsidiaries, Southern Mortgage Corporation, P.F. Service, Inc. and Sun Realty, Inc., which provide real estate services (collectively referred to as the “Company”). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Stock Compensation - The Company applies the provisions of APB 25 in accounting for its stock options plans, as allowed under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for the options granted to employees or directors with strike prices at or above the market value of the stock at the date of grant. Had compensation cost for these options been determined at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the methods of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share for the three and six months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, would have been as follows:

7

Table of Contents

In determining the above pro forma disclosure, the fair value of options granted during the year was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: expected volatility - 37%, expected life of grant - 6.5 years, risk free interest rate 5.25%, and expected dividend rate of 2.5%.

Recently Adopted or Issued Accounting Standards – Management of the Company is considering the impact of Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (“EITF 03-1”). EITF 03-1 indicates that an investor must have the intent and ability to hold an investment until a forecasted recovery of the fair value up to or beyond the cost of the investment in order to determine that any impairment is temporary. If the investor does not have the intent and ability to hold the investment until a forecasted recovery, then an other-than-temporary impairment must be recorded. The consensus by the EITF is effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2004. However, the guidance contained in paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1 has been delayed by FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF Issue 03-1-1, “Effective Date of Paragraphs 10-20 of EIFP Issue No. 03-1, ‘The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments’,” posted September 30, 2004. This delay does not suspend the requirements to recognize other-than-temporary impairments as required by existing authoritative literature. During the period of the delay, an entity holding investments should continue to apply relevant “other-than-temporary” guidance. The delay of the effective date for paragraphs 10-20 of Issue 03-1 will be superseded concurrent with the final issuance of FSP EITF Issue 03-1-a, “Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No. 03-1, ‘The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.’” Management has determined that the impact of EITF 03-1 was not material at March 31, 2005, but is continuing to evaluate the possible future impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004 the FASB issued Statement Number 123 (revised 2004) (“FAS 123 (R)”), Share-Based Payments. FAS 123 (R) requires all entities to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments such as stock options granted to employees. The Company is required to apply FAS 123 (R) on a modified prospective method. Under this method, the Company is required to record compensation expense (as previous awards continue to vest) for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding at the date of adoption. In addition, the Company may elect to adopt FAS 123 (R) by restating previously issued financial statements, basing the amounts on the expense previously calculated and reported in their pro forma disclosures that had been required by FAS 123. FAS 123 (R) is effective for the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. Management has not completed its evaluation of the effect that FAS 123 (R) will have but believes that the effect will be consistent with the application disclosed in its pro forma disclosures.

8

Table of Contents

Reclassifications – Certain amounts for the six-month period ended March 31, 2004 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for the six-month period ended March 31, 2005.

The earnings per share amounts were computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods presented. In accordance with Statement of Position No. 93-6, Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans, issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, shares owned by the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan that have not been committed to be released are not considered to be outstanding for the purpose of computing earnings per share.

The weighted average numbers of shares used in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation are set out in the table below:

On February 16, 2005, the Board of Directors declared an $0.08 per share quarterly cash dividend for holders of record March 15, 2005. The dividend was paid April 4, 2005.

Stock Option Plan - The Company’s stockholders approved the 1998 Stock Option Plan (“SOP”) on October 23, 1998. The SOP provides for a committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to award incentive non-qualified or compensatory stock options to purchase up to 357,075 shares of Company common stock. The options vest in equal amounts over five years with the first vesting date on October 23, 1999. Options granted vest immediately in the event of retirement, disability, or death, or following a change in control of the Company. Outstanding stock options can be exercised over a ten-year period. Under the SOP, options have been granted to directors and key employees of the Company. The exercise price in each case equals the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. The Company granted 350,000 options on October 23, 1998, which have an exercise price of $9.00 per share. As of March 31, 2005, 174,000 options were outstanding and exercisable.

NARK Stock Option Plan – During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, the Company completed its acquisition of North Arkansas Bancshares, Inc. The Company assumed 30,970 in stock options granted to employees and directors of North Arkansas Bancshares, Inc. related to such acquisition. All options granted to non-employee directors shall expire one year after the non-employee director ceases to maintain continuous service. On March 31, 2005, 16,831 options were outstanding.

The Company performed its annual impairment test as of April 1, 2004 and concluded there was no impairment to the book value of the Company’s goodwill. Absent any impairment indicators, the Company will perform its next impairment test as of April 1, 2005, during the quarter ended June 30, 2005.

9

Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2005 the Company had total core deposit premiums of $5,809,921, net of accumulated amortization of $3,780,286. Core deposit premiums are estimated to have a useful life of 10 years. The Company has no identifiable intangible assets with indefinite useful lives.

The amortization of core deposit premiums is reported in the “interest expense on deposits” line item of the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. Total amortization expense for core deposit premiums was approximately $486,602 for the six-month period ended March 31, 2005. Amortization expense for the net carrying amount of core deposit premiums at March 31, 2005, was estimated to be as follows (in thousands):

The Company is a defendant in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries.

A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows (in thousands):

The Company established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) on March 31, 1998. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the ESOP established a new $3.09 million line of credit with the Company. The loan proceeds were used to pay off the $0.29 million balance of the loan established during fiscal 2003 and the $1.80 million balance of the loan established during fiscal 2004. The remaining $1.00 million is to be used to purchase additional shares of Company stock on or before December 31, 2005. The loan is collateralized by shares that are purchased with the proceeds of the loan. As of March 31, 2005, the ESOP owed $2.41 million on the line of credit and had $0.68 million available to purchase additional shares. As the loan is repaid, ESOP shares will be allocated to participants of the ESOP and are available for release to the participants subject to the vesting provisions of the ESOP.

10

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc.

Pocahontas, Arkansas

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial condition of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2005, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss) for the three-month and six-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, of stockholders’ equity for the six-month period ended March 31, 2005, and of cash flows for the six-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial condition of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated December 22, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial condition as of September 30, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of financial condition from which it has been derived.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Little Rock, Arkansas

May 10, 2005

11

Table of Contents

ITEM 2

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. There are a number of important factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. These important factors include, without limitation, the Bank’s continued ability to originate quality loans, fluctuation of interest rates, real estate market conditions in the Bank’s lending areas, general and local economic conditions, the Bank’s continued ability to attract and retain deposits, the Company’s ability to control costs, new accounting pronouncements and changing regulatory requirements.

Overview-The Company is a savings and loan holding company headquartered in Jonesboro, Arkansas. The Company has no substantial operations other than serving as the holding company of its wholly owned subsidiary, First Community Bank (the “Bank”).

The Bank is a community-oriented federally chartered savings and loan association regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). The Bank has a total of 18 locations concentrated in the Northeast Arkansas counties of Craighead, Clay, Green, Jackson, Lawrence, Poinsett, Randolph and Sharp. Southern Mortgage Company, a mortgage company located in Tulsa, Oklahoma, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank.

Our primary business consists of acting as a financial intermediary by attracting deposits from the general public and using such funds, together with borrowings and other funds, to originate loans and invest in securities. Mortgage loans consist primarily of single family residential and commercial real estate located in the Company’s primary market areas. In addition to mortgage loans the Company uses funds to originate construction, consumer and commercial business loans and to purchase investment securities.

The Company is moving forward with many strategic initiatives this fiscal year. The Company is constructing two new branch locations in northeast Arkansas (one in Jonesboro and the other in Paragould). A new mall is scheduled to open in Jonesboro and we expect to open a location there. We are also expanding our operations in Tulsa, Oklahoma, having purchased a building there during the first quarter of fiscal 2005. The Tulsa branch opened during April 2005 and offers full service banking to our customers.

Second Quarter Highlights - Net income was $0.43 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared to net income of $1.43 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, a decrease of $1.00 million or 69.9%. Basic earnings per share were $0.10 and diluted earnings per share were $0.09 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared to basic earnings per share of $0.32 and diluted earnings per share of $0.31 for the same period last year.

The decrease in net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was primarily due to the decrease in net interest income and a $0.34 million trading loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 on our trading securities portfolio compared to a $0.29 million trading gain for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Net interest income before provision for loan loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 decreased 17.3% to $4.16 million from $5.04 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The Company’s net interest rate spread was 2.77% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to 3.18% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Net interest margin was 2.59% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to 3.09% for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. The yield on average interest earning assets decreased 16 basis points and the cost on average interest bearing liabilities increased 24 basis points for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 when compared to the rates for the same period last year resulting in the decreased interest rate spread and net interest income for the quarter.

12

Table of Contents

Net income was $1.55 million for the six months ended March 31, 2005, compared to net income of $2.80 million for the six months ended March 31, 2004, a decrease of $1.25 million or 44.7%. Basic and diluted earnings per share was $0.34 for the six months ended March 31, 2005, compared to basic earnings per share of $0.62 and diluted earnings per share of $0.61 for the same period last year.

The decrease in net income for the six months ended March 31, 2005 was primarily due to the decrease in net interest income and net trading gains on our trading securities portfolio. Net interest income before provision for loan loss for the six months ended March 31, 2005 decreased 14.9% to $8.53 million compared to $10.02 million for the six months ended March 31, 2004. The Company’s net interest rate spread was 2.82% for the six months ended March 31, 2005 compared to 3.10% for the six months ended March 31, 2004. Net interest margin was 2.66% for the six months ended March 31, 2005 compared to 3.01% for the six months ended March 31, 2004. The yield on average interest earning assets decreased 13 basis points and the cost on average interest bearing liabilities increased 14 basis points for the six months ended March 31, 2005 when compared to the rates for the same period last year resulting in the decreased interest rate spread and net interest income for the six months.

Critical Accounting Policies - In preparing financial information, management is required to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses for the periods shown. The accounting principles followed by the Company and the methods of applying these principles conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and general banking practices. Estimates and assumptions most significant to the Company are related primarily to allowance for loan losses and goodwill and are summarized in the following discussion and the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

The Company has established a systematic method of periodically reviewing the credit quality of the loan portfolio in order to establish a sufficient allowance for losses on loans. The allowance for losses on loans is based on management’s current judgments about the credit quality of individual loans and segments of the loan portfolio. The allowance for losses on loans is established through a provision for loan losses based on management’s evaluation of the risk inherent in the loan portfolio, and considers all known internal and external factors that affect loan collectability as of the reporting date. Such evaluation, which includes a review of all loans on which full collectability may not be reasonably assured, considers among other matters, the estimated net realizable value or the fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical loan loss experience, management’s knowledge of inherent risks in the portfolio that are probable and reasonably estimable and other factors that warrant recognition in providing an appropriate loan loss allowance. Although we believe that we have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, different assumptions used in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance could result in material changes in the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations. The Company’s policies and methodology for determining the allowance involve a high degree of complexity and require subjective judgments about uncertain matters.

The Company’s goodwill (the amount paid in excess of fair value of acquired net assets) is reviewed at least annually to ensure that there have been no events or circumstances resulting in an impairment of the recorded amount of excess purchase price. Adverse changes in the economic environment, operations of acquired business units, or other factors could result in a decline in projected fair values. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount, a loss would be recognized to reduce the carrying amount to implied fair value.

Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

13

Table of Contents

Balance Sheet Analysis and Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six months Ended March 31, 2005 and September 30, 2004

The following table shows the variance in dollars and percent change between the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at March 31, 2005 and at September 30, 2004:

14

Table of Contents

The following table shows the variance in dollars and percent change between the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the six months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004: