Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 0-17920

MetaSolv, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

5556 Tennyson Parkway

Plano, Texas 75024

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (972) 403-8300

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 126-2 of the Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

As of March 31, 2005, there were 41,611,257 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

METASOLV, INC.

INDEX

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

METASOLV, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-3-

Table of Contents

METASOLV, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-4-

Table of Contents

METASOLV, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

-5-

Table of Contents

METASOLV, INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1) Basis of Presentation

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of those of a normal recurring nature), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004, contained in the Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders and Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2005.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes requirements for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components. The Company reports comprehensive income in its stockholders’ equity. For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities and foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes, were the only items of other comprehensive income for the Company. Total comprehensive losses are as follows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):

The Company recognizes compensation cost associated with stock-based awards under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. The difference between the quoted market price as of the date of the grant and the contract purchase price of shares is charged to operations over the vesting period. No compensation cost has been recognized for fixed stock options with exercise prices equal to the market price of the stock on the dates of grant and shares acquired by employees under the Company’s stock purchase plans. Pro forma net loss and loss per share disclosures as if the Company recorded compensation expense based on the fair value for stock-based awards have been presented in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, and are as follows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

-6-

Table of Contents

2) Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue using the “residual method” when there is vendor-specific objective evidence of the fair values of all undelivered elements in a multiple-element arrangement that is not accounted for using long-term contract accounting. Under the residual method, the arrangement fee is recognized as follows: (1) the total fair value of the undelivered elements, as indicated by vendor-specific objective evidence, is deferred and subsequently recognized in accordance with the relevant sections of Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and (2) the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount deferred for the undelivered elements is recognized as revenue related to the delivered elements.

Where the Company has entered into a fixed price arrangement for consulting services, revenues are recognized for the arrangement on a percentage-of-completion basis as the services are provided or on a milestone basis, as appropriate.

3) Earnings Per Share

Securities that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three-month period ending March 31, 2005, because their effect was antidilutive, were options to purchase 11,275,136 shares of common stock and 771,998 shares of non-vested restricted common stock. Securities that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three-month period ending March 31, 2004, because their effect was antidilutive, were options to purchase 12,251,553 shares of common stock and 190,549 shares of unvested restricted common stock.

4) Segment Information

The Company operates in a single operating segment: communication software and related services. Revenue information regarding operations for different products and services is as follows (in thousands):

-7-

Table of Contents

5) Restructuring and Other Costs

During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company reduced its workforce to align costs with expected market conditions, and to continue to integrate and rationalize the operations of previous acquisitions with those of the Company. These actions resulted in charges of $2.1 million and the elimination of 64 positions. These severance payments were essentially completed by December 31, 2004.

The following table summarizes the status of the restructuring actions (in thousands):

There were no restructuring charges for the three months ending March 31, 2005.

6) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company is required to periodically assess the value of goodwill under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. The Company is one reporting unit, as defined by the standard. As outlined in the authoritative literature, the assessment of whether goodwill has been impaired is based on the Company’s estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit using a model that considers both a discounted future cash flow analysis and market capitalization data.

The following is a summary of intangible assets at March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004 (in thousands):

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was approximately $423,000 and $1,064,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

-8-

Table of Contents

Amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization at March 31, 2005, is projected as follows for the next four years (in thousands):

7) Indemnifications

The Company sells software licenses and services to its customers under contracts, which the Company refers to as a Master Software License and Service Agreement (“MSLA”). Each MSLA contains the relevant terms of the contractual arrangement with the customer, and normally includes certain provisions for indemnifying the customer against losses, expenses, and liabilities from damages that may be awarded against the customer in the event the Company’s software is found to infringe upon a patent, copyright, trademark, or other proprietary right of a third party. The MSLA usually seeks to mitigate the potential impact of such indemnification obligations in various ways, including but not limited to certain geographic and time limitations, and a right to replace an infringing product.

The Company employs various policies and practices to mitigate any possible exposure related to the indemnification provisions of the MSLA. For example, the Company requires its employees to sign a proprietary information and inventions agreement, which assigns the rights to its employees’ development work to the Company. To date, the Company has not had to reimburse any of its customers for any losses related to these indemnification provisions and no material claims are outstanding as of March 31, 2005. For several reasons, including the lack of prior indemnification claims and the lack of a monetary liability limit for certain infringement cases under the MSLA, the Company cannot determine the maximum amount of future payments, if any, related to such indemnification provisions.

-9-

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are a leading global provider of operations support systems (OSS) software solutions that help communications service providers manage their networks and services. Our order management, inventory management, service activation and network mediation products and services automate service providers’ business processes across network planning and engineering, operations and customer care. Our customers successfully use MetaSolv products to introduce new services more easily, reduce service delivery times, reduce operating expenses, and optimize return on capital expenditures. All of our revenues come from the sale of software licenses, related professional services, and support of our software.

Our business was founded in 1992, and soon afterward we began to build order-processing software to help service providers needing to connect local telephone service networks with long distance service networks. By 1999, the year we became a publicly held company, we had evolved into a leading provider of order management, inventory management, service activation, and network mediation software for service providers offering voice and data communications services over both traditional communications networks and internet-based networks. During that period our customer base was largely composed of competitive local exchange companies in the United States. The communications market downturn in 2000 through 2001 saw the departure of many of these customers from the marketplace, as funding for competitive local exchange carriers declined severely. In 2002 and 2003, we extended our product portfolio to include service activation products, through successive acquisitions of Nortel Network’s Service Commerce Division (2002), and Orchestream Holdings, plc (2003). These acquisitions also provided MetaSolv with a significant worldwide expansion of our customer base, operations capabilities and staff of skilled, experienced employees. We have continued that expansion with organic operating growth in 2005. Today we have offices in 11 locations around the world, serving over 180 customers in over 40 countries, and are internationally recognized as a global leader in OSS software for next-generation communications service providers.

The environment for marketing OSS software solutions to communications service providers remains challenging, as many telecommunications companies have reduced their operating costs and capital expenditures to cope with the depressed economic state of their industry that experienced a precipitous downturn that began in late 2000. During 2004 and into the first quarter of 2005, we have experienced modest improvement in order activity, interest in our products, revenues and reduced operating losses.

We expect the trends that will drive increasing demand for our products and services include an increasing worldwide use of converged, multi-service IP-based infrastructure for both mobile and fixed environments, and an overall growing demand for voice and data services. We have invested significantly in research and development of our products, particularly in the areas of network resource management and service activation capabilities, in order to meet the requirements of our customers and be well positioned for future growth.

We believe our product portfolio, our customer base, our people, and our continued investment and focus on network resource management, service activation and network mediation has positioned us well to provide end-to-end service fulfillment capabilities to both leading and emerging communications service providers around the world.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We prepare financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. This requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect significantly the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. For example, estimates are used in the accounting for the allowance for doubtful accounts, contingencies, restructuring costs, realizability of tax assets and other special charges. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Our software licensing and professional services agreements with customers typically have terms and conditions that are described in signed orders and a master agreement with each customer. Our sales for a given period typically involve large financial commitments from a relatively small number of customers. Accordingly, delays in the completion of sales during a quarter may negatively impact revenues in that quarter. Consistent with industry practice, we sometimes agree to bill our license fees in more than one installment over extended periods. When installments extend beyond six months, amounts not due immediately are deferred and recorded as revenue when payments are due, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

-10-

Table of Contents

We recognize license revenues when our customer has signed a license agreement, we have delivered the software product, product acceptance is not subject to express conditions, the fees are fixed or determinable and we consider collection to be probable. We allocate the agreed fees for multiple products and services licensed or sold in a single transaction among the products and services using the “residual method” as required by SOP 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions, deferring the fair value of the undelivered elements and recognizing the residual amount of the fees as revenue upon delivery of the software license. On occasion we may enter into a license agreement with a customer requiring development of additional software functions or services necessary for the software’s performance of specified functions. For those agreements, we recognize revenue for the entire arrangement on a percentage-of-completion basis as the development services are provided, or on a milestone basis, as appropriate. We recognize service revenues as the services are performed. We recognize revenues from maintenance agreements ratably over the maintenance period, usually one year.

Our software products are priced to meet the needs of our target market segments, which include large facility-based incumbent wireline service providers and wireless and IP service providers. We charge a base price for core products, coupled with additional license fees for add-on modules. In addition, we typically scale our license pricing based on the extent of our customers’ usage as measured by the number of users of our product, the number of our customers’ subscribers, or the size of the network our product helps manage. We sell additional license capacity for our products when our customers’ usage of our product exceeds earlier license limits. Annual maintenance and support contracts are generally priced as a percentage of the license fee for the product being maintained. For a new customer, our initial sale of licenses and associated services, including maintenance and support, generally ranges from several hundred thousand to several million dollars.

Service revenues consist principally of software implementations and customer training. We use our own employees and subcontract with system integrator partners to provide consulting services to our customers. MetaSolv consulting and education services are offered on a fixed price and an hourly basis, depending on the nature of the work and customer preferences.

Since we implement some of our services on a fixed fee basis, if we incur more costs than we expect in implementations, our profitability will suffer. Our process for tracking progress to completion on such arrangements is through individual detailed project plans and the regular review of labor hours incurred compared to estimated hours to complete the project. When estimates of costs to complete the project indicate that a loss will be incurred, these losses are recognized immediately.

Any estimation process, including that which is used in preparing contract accounting models, involves inherent risk. To the extent that our estimates of revenues and expenses on these contracts change periodically in the normal course of business, due to the modifications of our contractual arrangements or changes in cost, such changes would be reflected in the results of operations as a change in accounting estimate in the period the revisions are determined.

Maintenance revenues consist of income from software upgrades and support services for our customers. Our software maintenance agreements are typically contracted on an annual subscription basis and include both customer support and the right to product updates.

We normally ship our software and perform services shortly after we receive orders. As a result, our quarterly financial results are largely dependent on orders received during that period.

We recognize revenue only in cases where we believe collection is probable. In situations where collection is doubtful or when we have indications that a customer is facing financial difficulty, we recognize revenue as cash payments are received. In addition, for customers not on the cash basis of accounting, we maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the expected collectibility of accounts receivable. We regularly review the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts through identification of specific receivables where it is expected that payment will not be received, in addition to establishing a general reserve based upon our collection history that is applied to all amounts that are not specifically identified. If there is a deterioration of a major customer’s credit worthiness or actual defaults are higher than our historical experience, our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due us could be adversely affected. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate of the ultimate recovery of accounts receivable as of the reporting date. Changes may occur in the future that may cause us to reassess the collectibility of amounts and at which time we may need to reduce or provide additional allowances in excess of that currently provided.

-11-

Table of Contents

Each year we assess the realizability of our deferred tax assets by projecting whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, we carry a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, which are related primarily to net deductible temporary differences, tax credit carryforwards and net operating loss carryforwards. We evaluate a variety of factors in determining the amount of the deferred income tax assets to be recognized pursuant to SFAS No 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, including our earnings history, the number of years our operating loss and tax credits can be carried forward, the existence of taxable temporary differences, near-term earnings expectations, and the highly competitive nature of the communications industry and its potential impact on our business. As a result of these analyses we have reserved all of our deferred tax assets.

We evaluate our long-lived assets, including acquired intangibles, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of any assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of any asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

PRO FORMA FINANCIAL RESULTS

We report quarterly unaudited financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. We also report pro forma financial information in earnings releases and investor conference calls. This pro forma financial information excludes certain non-cash and special charges, consisting primarily of the amortization and impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, purchased in-process research and development, stock compensation expense, and restructuring costs. We believe the disclosure of the pro forma financial information helps investors evaluate the results of our ongoing operations. However, we urge investors to carefully review the financial information presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles included in our press releases, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our annual reports on Form 10-K.

-12-

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of total revenues represented by certain line items in our statements of operations.

Revenues

Total revenues in the first quarter of 2005 were $21.4 million, a 9% increase from $19.6 million in the first quarter of 2004. The increase in revenues between these periods primarily resulted from higher professional services revenue, while license and maintenance revenues increased to a lesser extent.

License Fees. License revenues in the first quarter of 2005 were $6.0 million, up slightly from $5.9 million in the first quarter of 2004. License revenues in the United States increased 25% from first quarter 2004 to first quarter 2005, partially offset by a 38% decrease in Europe’s license revenues.

Services. Services revenues consist of technical consulting and education services. Services revenues increased 38% to $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2005, from $3.8 million in the first quarter of 2004. The increase was largely due to a higher number of implementation projects in North America.

Maintenance. Maintenance revenues consist of post-contract customer support, including license product updates. Maintenance revenues increased 3% to $10.1 million in the first quarter of 2005, from $9.8 million in the first quarter of 2004. This increase in maintenance revenues was primarily due to an overall high customer retention, and growth in maintenance revenues from service activation products.

-13-

Table of Contents

Concentration of Revenues. As of March 31, 2005, our active customer list includes more than 180 communication service providers worldwide, including nearly half of the world’s 100 largest service providers. During the first quarter of 2005, our top ten customers represented approximately 39% of our total revenue with no single customer representing more than 10% of total revenue. In any given quarter, we generally derive a significant portion of our revenues from a small number of relatively large sales. A loss or significant decrease in the sale of products and services to any customer from whom we received a high percentage of our total revenues during a recent quarter is likely to have a material adverse affect on our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, our inability to consummate one or more substantial sales in any future period could seriously harm our operating results for that period.

International Revenues. During the first quarter of 2005, we recognized $12.1 million in revenues from customers outside the United States compared to $12.6 million in the first quarter of 2004, representing 57% and 64% of revenue in each period, respectively.

Cost of Revenues

License Cost. License cost of revenues consists primarily of royalties for third party software sold in conjunction with our products, and revenue-based third party engineering fees. License cost of revenues was $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2005 and $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2004 and represented 1% and 3% of license revenues in each period, respectively. This decrease in license cost of revenues as a percentage of license revenues was primarily due to lower negotiated royalty rates and the mix of products sold in each period. Royalties on individual license products range from zero to approximately 50% of revenue.

We plan to continue the use of third party software where it provides an advantage for our customers. While this plan lowers our overall product development cost, it may increase our cost of license revenues, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of revenues.

Service and Maintenance Cost. Service and maintenance cost of revenues consists of expenses to provide consulting, training and post-contract customer support services. These costs include compensation and related expenses for our employees and fees for third party consultants who provide services for our customers under subcontractor arrangements.

Service and maintenance cost of revenues were $8.6 million in the first quarter of 2005, up from $7.1 million in the first quarter of 2004, representing 56% and 52% of service and maintenance revenues in each period, respectively. This increase in service and maintenance cost of revenues, in dollars and as a percentage of revenues, was largely due to the relatively higher proportion of consulting services, which is more labor-intensive than maintenance. Services margins were also adversely affected by lower-priced consulting contracts, partially offset by lower third party royalties related to maintenance product shipments.

Amortization of Intangible Assets. The value assigned to intangible assets, primarily technology rights, is amortized over the estimated useful life of the assets using the greater of straight-line or the ratio that current gross revenues related to those assets bears to the total current and anticipated future gross revenues related to those assets. The original estimated useful lives of these assets range from nine months to sixty months.

In the first quarter of 2005, cost of revenues included $0.4 million in amortization of intangible assets, a decrease of 60% from $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2004. The decrease in amortization expense between 2005 and 2004 is due to completion of the amortization of certain intangibles from the acquisition of OSS assets from Nortel Networks in 2002.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs related to our staff of software developers, contracted development costs and the associated infrastructure costs required to support product development. During the first quarter of 2005, research and development expenses decreased 10% to $6.3 million from $7.0 million in the first quarter of 2004, representing 30% and 36% of total revenues in each period, respectively. This decrease in research and development expense between these periods was primarily due to a 20% reduction in research and development staffing.

During first quarter of 2005, our research and development investments were focused on our core competencies of network resource management, service activation and network mediation, in support of mobility, internet protocol (IP) and

-14-

Table of Contents

voice over IP (VOIP) domains. Additionally, we are investing to ease software integration for our customers, enabling rapid flow-through of service requests not only within our portfolio but between MetaSolv products and other business systems to further automate our customers’ business processes and lower their overall cost of doing business. During the past year we have focused our development investments in core product areas, while lowering development costs in general by shifting many routine tasks to offshore development resources. Offshore development resources currently represent between 5% and 10% of our total research and development investments, and is expected to grow in the near term. The increase in outsourcing would be to provide routine software development and customer support.

Our remaining research and development resources will continue to focus on enhancing our integrated, modular suite of products to address emerging communication technologies. The modular structure of our products allows communication service providers to implement product functionality in phases, depending on their needs, to realize near-term value and to maximize opportunities for longer-term benefits from an integrated OSS system.

Our product development methodology generally establishes technological feasibility near the end of the development process, when we have a working model. Costs incurred after the development of a working model and prior to product release are insignificant. Accordingly, we have not capitalized any software development costs.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, travel, trade shows, and other related expenses required to sell our software.

In the first quarter of 2005, sales and marketing expenses decreased 3% to $5.5 million from $5.7 million in the first quarter of 2004, representing 26% and 29% of revenue in each period, respectively. The decrease in sales and marketing expense in 2005 compared to 2004 was primarily due to lower commission expense to third party sales partners, and lower expense related to the recruiting and education of new employees.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist of costs for finance and accounting, legal, human resources, information systems, facilities, bad debt expense, and corporate management not directly allocated to other departments. General and administrative expenses in the first quarter of 2005 decreased 10% to $2.5 million, compared to $2.8 million in the first quarter of 2004, representing 12% and 14% of revenues in each period, respectively. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to lower facilities expense, depreciation, and business insurance premiums.

Restructuring and other Costs. During the first quarter of 2004, we reduced our workforce to align costs with expected market conditions. These actions resulted in a restructuring charge of $2.1 million for a reduction of 64 positions. The estimated annualized cost savings from these reductions is approximately $7 million. The severance payments were essentially completed in 2004.

There was no restructuring expense during the first quarter of 2005.

Interest and Other Income, Net

In the first quarter of 2005, interest and other income, net, primarily consisting of interest income and interest expense, was $0.3 million, compared to $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2004. The increase in interest and other income was primarily due to higher interest income from our marketable securities and interest income on a one time sales tax recovery.

Income Tax Expense

We recorded income tax expense of $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2005 and $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2004. The increase in tax expense in the first quarter of 2005 was primarily due to increased revenues in the United States to countries with tax withholding requirements.

Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“SFAS 109”), deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. SFAS 109 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not. Based upon the available evidence, which includes our recent operating performance and projections for near term future performance, we are continuing to fully reserve our deferred tax assets which we started reserving in the second quarter of 2004. We believe that, when taxable income is generated, the reversal of this valuation reserve will result in a tax provision that will be lower than the expected tax rate based on the statutory United States federal tax rate.

-15-

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2005, our primary sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, totaling $34.5 million and representing 56% of total assets. We invest our cash in excess of current operating requirements in short and intermediate term investment grade securities that are available for sale as needed to finance our future growth. Total cash and marketable securities decreased $0.7 million from a balance of $35.2 million at December 31, 2004.

Cash used in operating activities during the three months ending March 31, 2005, was $0.5 million, comprised of our $2.1 million net loss adjusted for the following non-cash expenses within our net income: depreciation, amortization of intangibles and stock compensation. Working capital was relatively unchanged during the period.

Net cash used by investing activities was $0.2 million for the three months ending March 31, 2005, comprised primarily of capital expenditures for computing equipment.

We believe that our projected cash flows to be generated by operations, together with current cash and marketable securities balances, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months. From time to time we evaluate potential acquisitions and other strategic relationships with complementary businesses, products and technologies. Should cash balances be insufficient to meet our long-term business objectives, or to complete an acquisition, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities. The decision to sell additional equity or debt securities could be made at any time and could result in additional dilution to our stockholders.

Our principal capital commitments consist of obligations under non-cancelable operating leases as shown in the following table (in thousands). We had outstanding contractual obligations for cumulative lease payments of approximately $21 million through 2010, which will be retired within the ordinary course of business, including approximately $6.8 million in leases for properties that we no longer occupy.

At March 31, 2005, our contractual obligations were as follows (in $000’s):

New Accounting Pronouncement

There were no new accounting pronouncements in the first quarter of 2005 that would have a material impact on our financial results.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123(R), Share Based Payment, which was a revision of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation. This statement supersedes APB Option 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2005. This Statement requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award—the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). No compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which employees do not render the requisite service. Employee share purchase plans will not result in recognition of compensation cost if certain conditions are met; those conditions are much the same as the related conditions in SFAS 123. The Company is planning to adopt this new standard in the first quarter of 2006. The estimated impact of this change in accounting will be an increase in stock compensation costs approximately $1.5 million to $1.8 million per quarter in 2006.

-16-

Table of Contents

Factors That May Affect Future Results

We operate in a dynamic and rapidly changing environment that involves numerous risks and uncertainties. The following section describes some, but not all, of these risks and uncertainties that we believe may adversely affect our business, financial conditions or results of operations. There are additional risks and uncertainties that we do not presently know, or that we currently view as immaterial, that may also impair our business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risks. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. If any of the following risks actually occur, they could materially harm our business, financial condition, or results of operations. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

OUR QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS CAN VARY SIGNIFICANTLY AND MAY CAUSE OUR STOCK PRICE TO FLUCTUATE.

Our quarterly operating results can vary significantly and are difficult to predict. As a result, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not a good indication of our future performance. It is likely that in certain quarters our operating results will be below the expectations of public market analysts or investors. In such an event, the market price of our common stock may decline significantly. A number of factors are likely to cause our quarterly results to vary, including:

-17-

Table of Contents

We forecast the volume and timing of orders for our operational planning, but these forecasts are based on many factors and subjective judgments, and we cannot assure their accuracy. We have hired and trained a large number of personnel in core areas, including product development and professional services, based on our forecast of future revenues. As a result, significant portions of our operating expenses are fixed in the short term. Therefore, failure to generate revenues according to our expectations in a particular quarter could have an immediate negative effect on results for that quarter.

Our quarterly revenues are dependent, in part, upon orders booked and delivered during that quarter. We expect that our sales will continue to involve large financial commitments from a relatively small number of customers. As a result, the cancellation, deferral, or failure to complete the sale of even a small number of licenses for our products and related services may cause our revenues to fall below expectations. Accordingly, delays in the completion of sales near the end of a quarter could cause quarterly revenues to fall substantially short of anticipated levels. Significant sales may also occur earlier than expected, which could cause operating results for later quarters to compare unfavorably with operating results from earlier quarters.

Some contracts for software licenses may not qualify for revenue recognition upon product delivery. Revenue may be deferred when there are significant elements required under the contract that have not been completed, there are express conditions relating to product acceptance, there are deferred payment terms, or when collection is not considered probable. A higher concentration of orders from large telecom service providers, and larger more complex agreements, may increase the frequency and amount of these deferrals. With these uncertainties we may not be able to predict accurately when revenue from these contracts will be recognized.

THE COMMUNICATIONS MARKET IS CHANGING RAPIDLY, AND FAILURE TO ANTICIPATE AND REACT TO THE RAPID CHANGE COULD RESULT IN LOSS OF CUSTOMERS OR UNPRODUCTIVE EXPENDITURES.

Over the last decade, the market for communications products and services has been characterized by rapid technological developments, evolving industry standards, dramatic changes in the regulatory environment, emerging companies, bankruptcy filings by many new entrants, changes in spending patterns, and frequent new product and service introductions. Our future success depends largely on our ability to enhance our existing products and services and to introduce new products and services that are capable of adapting to changing technologies, industry standards, regulatory changes, and customer spending patterns and preferences. If we are unable to successfully respond to these changes or do not respond in a timely or cost-effective way, our sales could decline and our costs for developing competitive products could increase.

New technologies, service industry standards, or spending patterns could require significant changes in our business model, development of new products or provision of additional services. New products and services may be expensive to develop and may result in our encountering new competitors in the marketplace. Furthermore, if the overall market for our software grows more slowly than we anticipate, or if our products and services fail in any respect to achieve market acceptance, our revenues would be lower than we anticipate and operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

THE COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY IS EXPERIENCING CONSOLIDATION, WHICH MAY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS FOR OUR SOFTWARE.

The communications industry has experienced significant consolidation. In the future, there may be fewer potential customers requiring operations support systems and related services, increasing the level of competition in the industry. In addition, larger communications companies generally have stronger purchasing power, which could create pressure on the prices we charge and the margins we realize. These companies are also striving to streamline their operations by combining different communications systems and the related operations support systems into one system, reducing the number of vendors needed. Although we have sought to address this situation by continuing to market our products and services to new customers and by working with existing customers to provide products and services that they need to remain competitive, we cannot be certain that we will not lose customers as a result of industry consolidation.

-18-

Table of Contents

OUR CUSTOMERS’ FINANCIAL WEAKNESS OR THEIR INABILITY TO OBTAIN FINANCING MAY LEAD TO LOWER SALES AND DECREASED PROFITABILITY.

Some of our customers are small to medium sized competitive communications service providers with limited operating histories. Some of these customers are not profitable and dependent on private sources of capital to fund their operations, and many competitive communications service providers are currently unable to obtain sufficient funds to continue expansion of their businesses. At the same time, many communications companies are encountering significant difficulties in achieving their business plans and financial projections. During the last three years, several of our customers ceased their business operations, and a significant number initiated bankruptcy proceedings. The downturn in the communications industry and the inability of many communications companies to raise capital have resulted in a decrease in the number of potential customers that are capable of purchasing our software, a delay by some of our existing customers in purchasing additional products, decreases in our customers’ operating budgets relating to our software maintenance services, delays in payments by existing customers, or failure to pay for our products. If our customers are unable to obtain adequate financing, sales of our software could suffer. If we fail to increase revenue related to our software, our operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected. In addition, adverse market conditions and limitations on the ability of our current customers to obtain adequate financing could adversely affect our ability to collect outstanding accounts receivable resulting in increased bad debt losses and a decrease in our overall profitability. Decreases in our customers’ operating budgets relating to software maintenance services could adversely affect our maintenance revenues and profitability. Any of our current customers who cease to be viable business operations would no longer be a source of maintenance revenue, or revenue from sales of additional software or services products, and this could adversely affect our financial results.

WE RELY ON A LIMITED NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS FOR A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF OUR REVENUES.

A significant portion of revenues each quarter is derived from a relatively small number of large sales. As consolidation in the communications industry continues, our reliance on a limited number of customers for a significant portion of our revenues may increase. The amount of revenue we derive from a specific customer is likely to vary from period to period, and a major customer in one period may not produce significant additional revenue in a subsequent period. In the first quarter of 2005, no customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue and our top ten customers accounted for 39% of total revenues. During 2004, our top ten customers accounted for 44% of our total revenues. To the extent that any major customer terminates its relationship with us, or that we are unable to consummate one or more substantial sales, our revenues could be adversely affected.

COMPETITION FROM LARGER, BETTER CAPITALIZED OR EMERGING COMPETITORS FOR THE COMMUNICATIONS PRODUCTS AND SERVICES THAT WE OFFER COULD RESULT IN PRICE REDUCTIONS, REDUCED GROSS MARGINS AND LOSS OF MARKET SHARE.

Competition in our markets is intense and involves rapidly changing technologies and customer requirements, as well as evolving industry standards and frequent product introductions. Competitors vary in size and scope of products and services offered. We encounter direct competition from several product and service vendors. Additionally, we compete with OSS solutions sold by large equipment vendors. We also compete with systems integrators and with the information technology departments of large communications service providers. Finally, we are aware of communications service providers, software developers, and smaller entrepreneurial companies that are focusing significant resources on developing and marketing products and services intended to compete with ours. We anticipate continued long-term growth in the communications industry and the entrance of new competitors in the order processing, inventory management and fulfillment software markets, and we expect that the market for our products and services will remain intensely competitive.

IF THE INTERNET OR BROADBAND COMMUNICATION SERVICES GROWTH SLOWS, DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS MAY FALL.

Our success depends heavily on the continued acceptance of the Internet as a medium of commerce and communication, and the growth of broadband communication services. The growth of the Internet has driven changes in the public communication network and has given rise to the growth of the next-generation service providers who are our customers. If use of the Internet or broadband communication services does not continue to grow or grows more slowly than expected, the market for software that manages communication over the Internet may not develop and our sales would

-19-

Table of Contents

be adversely affected. Consumers and businesses may reject the Internet as a viable commercial medium for a number of reasons, including potentially inadequate network infrastructure, slow development of technologies, insufficient commercial support and security or privacy concerns. The Internet infrastructure may not be able to support the demands placed on it by increased usage and bandwidth requirements. In addition, delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols or increased government regulation, could cause the Internet to lose its viability as a commercial medium. Even if the required infrastructure, standards, protocols or complementary products, services or facilities are developed, we may incur substantial expense adapting our solutions to changing or emerging technologies.

CHANGES IN COMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR CUSTOMERS AND MAY LEAD TO LOWER SALES.

Our customers are subject to extensive regulation as communications service providers. Changes in legislation or regulations that adversely affect our existing and potential customers could lead them to spend less on our software, which would reduce our revenues and could seriously affect our business and financial condition.

IF WE FAIL TO ACCURATELY ESTIMATE THE RESOURCES NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ANY FIXED-PRICE CONTRACT, IF WE FAIL TO MEET OUR PERFORMANCE OBLIGATIONS, OR IF WE FAIL TO ANTICIPATE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH PARTICULAR SALES OR SUPPORT CONTRACTS, WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO ABSORB COST OVERRUNS AND WE MAY SUFFER LOSSES ON PROJECTS.

In addition to time and materials contracts, we have periodically entered into fixed-price contracts for software implementation, and we may do so in the future. These fixed-price contracts involve risks because they require us to absorb possible cost overruns. Our failure to accurately estimate the resources required for a project or our failure to complete our contractual obligations in a manner consistent with the project plan would likely cause us to have lower margins or to suffer a loss on such a project, which would negatively impact our operating results. Also, in some instances our sales and support contracts may require us to provide software functionality that we have procured from third party vendors. The cost of this third party functionality may impact our margins, and we could fail to accurately anticipate or manage these costs. On occasion we have been asked or required to commit unanticipated additional resources or funds to complete projects or fulfill sales and support contracts.

IN ORDER TO GENERATE INCREASED REVENUE, WE NEED TO EXPAND OUR SALES AND DISTRIBUTION CAPABILITIES.

We must expand our direct and indirect sales operations to increase market awareness of our products and to generate increased revenue. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in these efforts. Our products and services require a sophisticated sales effort targeted at the senior management of our prospective customers. New hires will require training and take time to achieve full productivity. We cannot be certain that our recent hires will become as productive as necessary or that we will be able to hire enough qualified individuals in the future. As the communications service provider market consolidates, there may be an increased tendency on the part of the remaining service providers to purchase through large systems integrators and third-party resellers. We are working to expand our relationships with systems integrators and other partners to expand our indirect sales channels. Failure to expand these sales channels could adversely affect our revenues and operating results. In addition, we will need to manage potential conflicts between our direct sales force and third party reselling efforts.

WE DEPEND ON SUBCONTRACTED OFFSHORE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND CONSULTING RESOURCES, WHICH INTRODUCES RISKS RELATED TO OUR COST STRUCTURE, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND RESOURCE AVAILABILITY.

We have increased our development investment in service activation products and lowered development expense in certain products by contracting with offshore development resources, and are also working to expand our availability of consulting and training resources through alliances with these subcontractors. We believe that our success will depend in part on our ability to continue, expand and manage the use of offshore subcontracting resources in these and other respects. There are certain risks entailed in these practices, including but not limited to: those described under the topic of international operations below; the continued availability of these resources is not assured; the potential for migration of some expertise to a contractor outside of our organization; and our policies relating to development and protection of intellectual property rights may be harder or not possible to institute, manage or enforce in a subcontractor organization.

-20-

Table of Contents

OUR ABILITY TO ATTRACT, TRAIN AND RETAIN QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES IS CRUCIAL TO OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FUTURE GROWTH.

As a company focused on the development, sale and delivery of software products and related services, our personnel are our most valued assets. Our future success depends in large part on our ability to hire, train and retain software developers, systems architects, project managers, communications business process experts, systems analysts, trainers, writers, consultants, and sales and marketing professionals of various experience levels. Competition for skilled personnel is intense. Any inability to hire, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees could hinder the growth of our business.

We also believe that our success will depend on the continued employment of our senior management team and key technical personnel. This dependence is particularly important to our business because personal relationships are a critical element of obtaining and maintaining business contacts with our customers. Our senior management team and key technical personnel would be very difficult to replace and the loss of any of these key employees could seriously harm our business.

OUR FUTURE SUCCESS DEPENDS ON OUR CONTINUED USE OF STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS TO IMPLEMENT AND SELL OUR PRODUCTS.

We have entered into relationships with third party systems integrators and hardware platform and software applications developers. We rely on these third parties to assist our customers and to lend expertise in large scale, multi-system implementation and integration projects, including overall program management and development of custom interfaces for our products. Should these third parties go out of business or choose not to provide these services, we may be forced to develop those capabilities internally, incurring significant expense and adversely affecting our operating margins.

THE EXPANSION OF OUR PRODUCTS WITH NEW FUNCTIONALITY AND TO NEW CUSTOMER MARKETS MAY BE DIFFICULT AND COSTLY.

We plan to invest significant resources and management attention to expanding our products by adding new functionality and to expanding our customer base by targeting customers in markets that we have not previously served. We cannot be sure that expanding the footprint of our products or selling our products into new markets will generate acceptable financial results due to uncertainties inherent in entering new markets and in our ability to execute our plans. Costs associated with our product and market expansions may be more costly than we anticipate, and demand for our new products and in new customer markets may be lower than we expect.

FOR SOME OF OUR PRODUCTS WE RELY ON SOFTWARE AND OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THAT WE HAVE LICENSED FROM THIRD PARTY DEVELOPERS TO PERFORM KEY FUNCTIONS.

Some of our products contain software and other intellectual property that we license from third parties, including software that is integrated with internally developed software and used in our products to perform key functions. We could lose the right to use this software and intellectual property or it could be made available to us only on commercially unreasonable terms. We could fail to accurately recognize or anticipate the impact of the costs of procuring this third party intellectual property. Although we believe that alternative software and intellectual property is available from other third party suppliers, the loss of or inability to maintain any of these licenses or the inability of the third parties to enhance in a timely and cost-effective manner their products in response to changing customer needs, industry standards or technological developments could result in delays or reductions in product shipments by us until equivalent software could be developed internally or identified, licensed and integrated, which would harm our business.

OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS MAY BE DIFFICULT AND COSTLY.

We intend to continue to devote significant management and financial resources to our international operations. In particular, we will have to continue to attract experienced management, technical, sales, marketing and support personnel for our international offices. Competition for skilled people in these areas is intense and we may be unable to attract qualified staff. International expansion may be more difficult or take longer than we anticipate, especially due to cultural differences, language barriers, and currency exchange risks. Additionally, communications infrastructure in foreign countries may be different from the communications infrastructure in the United States.

-21-

Table of Contents

Moreover, international operations are subject to a variety of additional risks that could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. These risks include the following:

WE HAVE ACQUIRED OTHER BUSINESSES AND WE MAY MAKE ADDITIONAL ACQUISITIONS OR ENGAGE IN JOINT BUSINESS VENTURES THAT COULD BE DIFFICULT TO INTEGRATE, DISRUPT OUR BUSINESS, DILUTE STOCKHOLDER VALUE AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR OPERATING RESULTS.

We have acquired other businesses and may make additional acquisitions, or engage in joint business ventures in the future that may be difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value, complicate our management tasks and affect our operating results. In February 2002 we completed the acquisition of certain OSS assets from Nortel Networks that added service activation and other products to our product portfolio, and in February 2004 we completed the acquisition of Orchestream Holdings plc, a manufacturer of IP network management software located in the United Kingdom. Acquisitions and investments in businesses involve significant risks, and our failure to successfully manage acquisitions or joint business ventures could seriously harm our business. Our past acquisitions and potential future acquisitions or joint business ventures create numerous risks and uncertainties including:

-22-

Table of Contents

Our inability to successfully integrate acquisitions or to otherwise manage business growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Also, our existing stockholders may be diluted if we finance the acquisitions by issuing equity securities.

FUTURE SALES OF OUR COMMON STOCK WOULD BE DILUTIVE TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS AND COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, those future sales of our common stock by us, or the availability of shares of our common stock for future sale, will have on the market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock (including shares issued upon the exercise of stock options), or the perception that such sales could occur, may materially and adversely affect prevailing market prices for common stock.

OUR FAILURE TO MEET CUSTOMER EXPECTATIONS OR DELIVER ERROR-FREE SOFTWARE COULD RESULT IN LOSSES AND NEGATIVE PUBLICITY.

The complexity of our products and the potential for undetected software errors increase the risk of claims and claim-related costs. Due to the mission-critical nature of network resources, management and fulfillment software, undetected software errors are of particular concern. The implementation of our products, which we accomplish through our professional services division and with our partners, typically involves working with sophisticated software, computing and communications systems. If our software contains undetected errors or we fail to meet our customers’ expectations or project milestones in a timely manner, we could experience:

-23-

Table of Contents

Our licenses with customers generally contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential claims, such as disclaimers of warranties and limitations on liability for special, consequential and incidental damages. In addition, our license agreements usually cap the amounts recoverable for damages to the amounts paid by the licensee to us for the product or services giving rise to the damages. However, we cannot be sure that these contractual provisions will protect us from additional liability. Furthermore, our general liability insurance coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims, or the insurer may disclaim coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of any large claim against us could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

OUR LIMITED ABILITY TO PROTECT OUR PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR ABILITY TO COMPETE, AND WE MAY BE FOUND TO INFRINGE ON THE PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF OTHERS.

Our success depends in part on our proprietary software technology. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright law and contractual restrictions to protect our technology. We cannot guarantee that the steps we have taken to assess and protect our proprietary rights will be adequate to deter misappropriation of our intellectual property, and we may not be able to detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce our intellectual property rights. If third parties infringe or misappropriate our copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets or other proprietary information, our business could be seriously harmed. In addition, although we believe that our proprietary rights do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, other parties may assert infringement claims against us or claim that we have violated their intellectual property rights. These risks may be increased by the addition of intellectual property assets through business or product acquisitions. Claims against us, either successful or unsuccessful, could result in significant legal and other costs and may be a distraction to management. We currently focus on intellectual property protection within the United States. These risks may also be increased by our use or others’ use with our products of software made available under open source software licenses, the terms of which may be subject to varying or commercially unfavorable interpretations, and the enforcement and application of which have not been extensively tested or settled in applicable judicial systems. Protection of intellectual property outside of the United States will sometimes require additional filings with local patent, trademark, or copyright offices, as well as the implementation of contractual or license terms different from those used in the United States. Protection of intellectual property in many foreign countries is weaker and less reliable than in the United States. As our business expands into foreign countries, costs and risks associated with protecting our intellectual property abroad will increase. We also may choose to forgo the costs and related benefits of certain intellectual property benefits in some of these jurisdictions.

OUR STOCK PRICE HAS BEEN AND MAY REMAIN VOLATILE, WHICH EXPOSES US TO THE RISK OF SECURITIES LITIGATION.

The trading price of our common stock has in the past and may in the future be subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors such as the following:

-24-

Table of Contents

Fluctuations in the price of our common stock may expose us to the risk of securities lawsuits. Defending against such lawsuits could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources. In addition, any settlement or adverse determination of these lawsuits could subject us to significant liabilities.

IF WE FAIL TO MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF INTERNAL CONTROLS, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DETECT FRAUD OR REPORT OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS ACCURATELY, WHICH COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS.

Effective internal controls support our provision of reliable financial reports, as well as prevention and detection of fraud. We review and evaluate our internal controls systems periodically, to determine their effectiveness and identify potential areas of improvement. These evaluations and reports may indicate that enhancements or changes to these systems of internal controls are advisable. Furthermore, we may from time to time acquire businesses which have limited infrastructure and systems of internal controls. Assessing internal controls, making needed changes, and keeping internal controls processes effective is costly and consumes significant management time, especially with newly acquired entities. Even the best internal control systems are based in part on assessments of probability, and can give reasonable but not complete assurance that the system is working successfully. Given the inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will achieve its stated goals under all potential future conditions. If we do not implement and maintain an effective system of internal controls or prevent fraud, we may incur losses or be subject to costly litigation. In those cases investors could lose confidence in our financial reporting. Our reputation and our operating results could be harmed, which could lower the trading price of our common stock.

PROVISIONS OF OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS, DELAWARE LAW AND OUR STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN COULD DISCOURAGE A TAKEOVER YOU MAY CONSIDER FAVORABLE OR THE REMOVAL OF OUR CURRENT MANAGEMENT.

Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that you may consider favorable or the removal of our current management. These provisions:

Delaware law may also discourage, delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us. In addition, purchase rights distributed under our stockholder rights plan will cause substantial dilution to any person or group attempting to acquire us without conditioning the offer on our redemption of the rights. As a result, our stock price may decrease and you might not receive a change of control premium over the then-current market price of the common stock.

-25-

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to market risks principally relates to changes in interest rates that may affect our fixed income investments and our exposure to adverse movements in foreign exchange rates.

(a) Fixed Income Investments

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. Our exposure to market risks for changes in interest rates relate primarily to investments in debt securities issued by U.S. government agencies and corporate debt securities. We place our investments with high quality issuers and, by policy, limit the amount of the credit exposure to any one issuer.

Our general policy is to limit the risk of principal loss and ensure the safety of invested funds by limiting market and credit risk. All investments with three months or less to maturity at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents; investments with maturities at the date of purchase between three and twelve months are considered to be short-term investments; investments with maturities in excess of twelve months are considered to be long-term investments. At March 31, 2005, the weighted average pre-tax interest rate on the investment portfolio was approximately 2.6%. Market risk related to these investments can be estimated by measuring the impact of a near-term adverse movement of 10% in short-term market interest rates. If these rates average 10% more in 2005 than in 2004, there would be no material adverse impact on our results of operations or financial position.

(b) Foreign Currency

We transact business in various foreign currencies. As we continue to expand our international business, we are subject to increasing exposure from adverse movements in foreign exchange rates. Our operating expenses in Europe are primarily in the local currency, which serves to mitigate some of our exposure to the Euro and British Pound. At the present time, we do not hedge our foreign currency exposure, nor do we use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, there was a weakening in the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar, that when combined with our balance sheet exposure, contributed to a decrease in equity of approximately $47,000.

Market risk related to foreign currency exchange rates can be estimated by measuring the impact of a near-term adverse movement of 10% in foreign currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar. If these rates average 10% more in 2005 than in 2004, there would be no material adverse impact on our results of operations or financial position.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of March 31, 2005). Based on this evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2005, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) are not yet reportable as effective, because of the material weakness reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Management is implementing the necessary remediation as stated in Item 4(c) below.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter for which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is filed that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

-26-

Table of Contents

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. The Company’s Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting is contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company identified, based on its assessment, a material weakness in internal controls relating to employing personnel with adequate expertise in matters related to accounting for estimated tax exposures and foreign income taxes.

(c) Remediation Steps to Address Material Weakness

Management has identified and is implementing remediation activity necessary to address the material weakness relating to accounting for income tax estimates and foreign income taxes. Management’s remediation actions include:

Management is committed to remediating the material weakness as quickly as reasonably possible. Management believes that the steps taken to date are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Management expects that its independent auditors will be in a position to test and conclude that the material weakness has been remediated prior to end of 2005.

(d) Scope of the Controls Evaluation

The CEO and CFO evaluation of our disclosure controls and internal controls is performed with significant participation from our management team. Our controls evaluation process includes internal reports and letters of assurance from business unit vice presidents. We perform this evaluation on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning overall control effectiveness can be reported in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our annual reports on Form 10-K. Our internal controls are also evaluated throughout the year by internal audit.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

No change from that reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None

-27-

Table of Contents

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits

-28-

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: May 10, 2005

-29-