MERISTAR HOSPITALITY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP LP - 10-Q Quarterly Report

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q is being filed jointly by MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P., or MHOP; MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp, or MeriStar Finance; MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp II, or MeriStar Finance II; and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp III, or MeriStar Finance III. No separate financial or other information of MeriStar Finance, MeriStar Finance II or MeriStar Finance III is material to holders of the securities of MHOP, MeriStar Finance, MeriStar Finance II or MeriStar Finance III since as of March 31, 2005, they had no operations, no employees, only nominal assets and no liabilities other than their obligations as corporate co-issuers under the indentures governing the senior unsecured notes issued in January 2001, December 2001 and February 2002.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. is the subsidiary operating partnership of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation Commission file number 1-11903, (“MeriStar Hospitality”, which is a real estate investment trust, or REIT). We own a portfolio of primarily upper upscale, full-service hotels and resorts in the United States. Our portfolio is diversified geographically as well as by franchise and brand affiliations. As of March 31, 2005, we owned 73 hotels with 20,319 rooms, all of which were leased by our taxable subsidiaries. 71 of these hotels were managed by Interstate Hotels & Resorts (“Interstate”), one hotel was managed by The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC (“Ritz-Carlton”), a subsidiary of Marriott International, Inc., and one hotel was managed by another subsidiary (“Marriott”) of Marriott International, Inc. (collectively with Interstate and Ritz-Carlton, the “Managers”).

The Managers operate the 73 hotels we owned as of March 31, 2005 pursuant to management agreements with our taxable subsidiaries. Under these management agreements, each taxable subsidiary pays a management fee for each property to the Manager of its hotels. The taxable subsidiaries in turn make rental payments to our subsidiary operating partnership under the participating leases.

Under the Interstate management agreements, the base management fee is 2.5% of total hotel revenue, plus incentive payments based on meeting performance thresholds that could total up to an additional 1.5% of total hotel revenue. The agreements have initial terms expiring on January 1, 2011 with three renewal periods of five years each at the option of Interstate, subject to some exceptions. Additionally, our franchise fees generally range from 2.0% to 7.4% of hotel room revenues.

Under the Ritz-Carlton and Marriott management agreements, the base management fee is 3.0% and 2.5% of total hotel revenue, respectively, through 2005 and 3.0% under both thereafter, plus incentive payments based on meeting performance thresholds that could total up to an additional 2.0% of total revenue and 20% of available cash flow (as defined in the relevant management agreement), respectively. The agreements have initial terms expiring in 2015 and 2024, respectively, with four and three renewal periods of 10 and five years each, respectively, at the option of Ritz-Carlton and Marriott. The Ritz-Carlton and Marriott management agreements include certain limited performance guarantees by the relevant manager which are designed primarily to provide downside performance protection and run through 2005 and up to 2008, respectively. Management, based upon budgets and operating trends, expects payments under these guarantees for 2005 and in the future to be minimal.

Interim Financial Statements. We have prepared these unaudited interim financial statements according to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. We have omitted certain information and footnote disclosures that are normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, accompanying notes and other information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its subsidiaries and its controlled affiliates. We consolidate entities (in the absence of other factors when determining control) when we own over 50% of the voting shares of another company or, in the case of partnership investments, when we own a majority of the general partnership interest. Additionally, if we determine that we are an owner in a variable interest entity within the

meaning of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, revision to Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” and that our variable interest will absorb a majority of the entity’s expected losses if they occur, receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns if they occur, or both, then we will consolidate the entity. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. One of our properties reports results over 13 four week periods each year. We include 12 weeks of results in each of quarters one through three and 16 weeks of results in quarter four.

Use of Estimates. Preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

Property and Equipment. We record our property and equipment at cost, or at fair value at the time of contribution for contributed property. We use the straight-line method for depreciation. We depreciate the majority of our buildings and improvements over an estimated useful life of 20 to 40 years, or the remaining terms of a ground lease, if shorter. We depreciate furniture, fixtures and equipment over lives ranging from five to seven years, and computers over three to five years. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized depreciation expense of $23.4 million and $24.5 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we capitalized interest of $2.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

Held for Sale Properties. Held-for-sale classification requires that the sale be probable and that the transfer of the asset is expected to be completed within one year, among other criteria. Assessing the probability of the sale requires significant judgment due to the uncertainty surrounding completing the transaction, and as a result, we have developed the following policy to aid in the assessment of probability. We classify the properties we are actively marketing as held for sale once all of the following conditions are met:

We carry properties held for sale at the lower of their carrying values or estimated fair values less costs to sell. We cease depreciation at the time the asset is classified as held for sale. If material to our total portfolio, we segregate the assets and liabilities relating to our held for sale properties on our consolidated balance sheet.

Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash. We classify investments with original maturities of three months or less as cash equivalents. Our cash equivalents include investments in debt securities, including commercial paper, overnight repurchase agreements and money market funds. Restricted cash represents amounts held in escrow in accordance with the requirements of certain of our credit facilities.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. We record as discontinued operations the current and prior period operating results of any asset that has been classified as held for sale or has been disposed of and where we have no continuing involvement. Any gains or losses on final disposition are also included in discontinued operations.

Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may be impaired, an analysis is performed to determine the recoverability of the asset’s carrying value. When we conclude that we expect to sell or otherwise dispose of an asset significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life, we perform an impairment analysis on that asset (as is the case for assets we are considering for disposition). We make estimates of the undiscounted cash flows from the expected future operations or potential sale of the asset. If the analysis indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from these estimates of cash flows, we write down the asset to estimated fair value and recognize an impairment loss. Any impairment losses we recognize on assets held for use are recorded as operating expenses. We record any impairment losses on assets held for sale as a component of discontinued operations.

Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. We recognize a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity only when the liability is incurred, and measure that liability initially at

fair value. Hotels of which we dispose may be managed under agreements that require payments as a result of termination. Any such liability will be recognized at the time the asset disposition is complete and a termination notice is provided. At that time, the recognition of the termination obligation will be included in the calculation of the final gain or loss on sale. To date, we have not incurred any management agreement termination obligations other than in connection with sales of hotels.

Stock-Based Compensation. We apply the provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” as amended by SFAS No. 148, for new stock options issued under our compensation programs sponsored by MeriStar Hospitality. As permitted by SFAS No. 148, we elected to apply the provisions prospectively, which includes recognizing compensation expense for only those stock options issued in 2003 and after. We grant options with an exercise price equal to the price of our common stock on grant date. Compensation costs related to stock options are included in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. We apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” in accounting for our stock options issued by MeriStar Hospitality under our compensation programs prior to January 1, 2003. As MeriStar Hospitality granted these stock options at fair market value, no compensation cost has been recognized. For our other equity-based compensation plans, we recognize compensation expense over the vesting period based on the fair market value of the award at the date of grant for fixed plan awards, while variable plan awards are re-measured based upon the intrinsic value of the award at each balance sheet date.

Had compensation cost been determined based on fair value at the grant date for awards granted prior to our adoption of the fair value method, our net loss and per unit amounts would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated as follows (in thousands, except per unit amounts):

These pro forma compensation costs may not be representative of the actual effects on reported net loss and loss per unit in future years.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Our interest rate risk management objective is to manage the effect of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. We look to manage interest rates through the use of a combination of fixed and variable rate debt. We only enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for hedging purposes. We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income based on the derivative’s effectiveness and whether the derivative has been designated as a cash flow or fair value hedge.

Acquisition of Hotels. Our hotel acquisitions consist almost exclusively of land, building, furniture, fixtures and equipment. We allocate the purchase price among these asset classes and any acquired intangible assets based upon their respective fair values as required by SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.”

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates. We have non-controlling interests in entities which we account for under the cost method or equity method of accounting. Our investment in MeriStar Investment Partners, L.P. (“MIP”) is a limited partner interest with no participation rights in the management, affairs or operations of the entity, and is accounted for using the cost method. We recognize our preferred return on this investment quarterly as it becomes due to us; this investment is reflected in a separate line item on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our investment in Radisson Lexington Avenue Hotel is accounted for using the equity method, since we are presumed to exert significant influence on this entity due to our ownership percentage of 49.99%. Accordingly, we recognize 49.99% of the profit and loss of the investee. This investment is also reflected in a separate line item on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Our investments in unconsolidated affiliates are periodically reviewed for other than temporary declines in market value. An impairment is recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the investment for any declines which are determined to be other than temporary.

Accounting for the Impact of the Hurricane Damage to Florida Properties. In August and September 2004, hurricanes caused substantial damage to a number of our hotels located in Florida. The hurricane damage and local evacuation orders also caused significant business interruption at many of our Florida properties, including the complete closure of certain hotels. As a result, seven of our hotels were closed for an extended period of time, and five others were affected in varying degrees.

We have comprehensive insurance coverage for both property damage and business interruption. Some properties are requiring substantial repair and reconstruction and have remained closed while such repairs are completed. Our recovery effort is extensive and includes replacing portions of buildings, landscaping and furniture, as well as upgrading to comply with changes in building and electrical codes. As of March 31, 2005, the net book value of the property damage is estimated to be at least $65.5 million; however, we are still assessing the impact of the hurricanes on our properties, and final net book value write-offs could vary from this estimate. Changes to this estimate will be recorded in the periods in which they are determined. We have recorded a corresponding insurance claim receivable for this $65.5 million net book value amount because we believe that it is probable that the insurance recovery, net of deductibles, will exceed the net book value of the damaged portion of these assets. The recovery is based on replacement cost, and we have submitted claims substantially in excess of $65.5 million.

While we expect the insurance proceeds will be sufficient to cover most of the replacement cost of the restoration of these hotels, certain deductibles (primarily windstorm) and limitations will apply. Moreover, while we are receiving and expect to continue to receive interim insurance payments, no determination has been made as to the total amount or timing of those insurance payments, and those insurance payments may not be sufficient to cover the costs of all the restoration of the hotels. To the extent that insurance proceeds, which are calculated on a replacement cost basis, ultimately exceed the net book value of the damaged property, a gain will be recorded in the period when all contingencies related to the insurance claim have been resolved and the relevant payments have been received.

As of March 31, 2005, seven of our Florida properties remained substantially closed due to hurricane damage. As of May 2, 2005, six of these properties remained substantially closed. Additionally, as of March 31, 2005, two properties that suffered varying amounts of hurricane damage had certain rooms and conference facilities out of service. Where possible and in order to mitigate loss of revenues, some permanent repairs to damaged properties have been deferred during the Florida “high season”, which generally lasts from late December through early April, in order to have facilities available to meet demand. These damaged facilities will be removed from service for permanent repairs at a later date. We have hired consultants to assess our business interruption claims and are currently negotiating with our insurance carriers regarding the amount of loss for these income losses sustained. To the extent that we are entitled to a recovery under the insurance policies, we will recognize a receivable when it can be demonstrated that it is probable that such insurance recovery will be realized, and such receivable will then be reflected as a component of operating income. Any gain resulting from business interruption insurance for lost income will not be recognized until all contingencies related to the insurance recoveries are resolved and collection of the relevant payments is probable. These income recognition criteria will likely often result in business interruption insurance recoveries being recorded in a period subsequent to the period that we experience lost income from the affected properties, resulting in fluctuations in our net income that may reduce the comparability of reported quarterly results for some periods into the future.

Under these income recognition criteria, as of March 31, 2005, we have recorded a business interruption recovery gain of $2.3 million due to receiving recognition of a minimal level of business interruption profit that the insurance companies are willing to recognize without any contingencies at this time for certain of our hurricane-affected properties. Our business interruption claims substantially exceed the amount of this minimal recognition to date. We ultimately expect to recognize additional business interruption insurance profit as we proceed further through the claims process.

Through March 31, 2005, we have incurred recoverable costs related to both property damage and business interruption recoveries totaling $56.4 million. In addition, we recorded a receivable of $65.5 million related to the write-off of the net book value of the damaged portion of our assets. We collected $63.3 million in insurance advances through March 31, 2005, of which $61.0 million reduced our receivable balance, and $2.3 million represented income on our business interruption recoveries. We have collected an additional $7.2 million in advances from April 1 through May 2, 2005. The cost recoveries are recorded on the expense line item to which they relate; therefore there is no net impact to any line item or our results.

The following is a summary of hurricane-related activity recorded (in millions):

New Accounting Pronouncements. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires companies to recognize compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions, and measure that cost based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. We are required to comply with the provisions of this statement beginning with the first quarter of 2006. We do not expect the adoption of this revised standard to have a material effect on our accounting treatment for share-based payments, as we adopted the transition provisions of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” on January 1, 2003 and elected to recognize compensation expense for options granted subsequent to December 31, 2002 under the fair-value-based method.

The FASB issued Statement No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” in December 2004. This Statement amends Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. We are required to comply with the provisions of this statement for the third quarter of 2005. We have not entered into or modified any transactions within the scope of this standard, nor do we have any existing transactions that fall within the scope of SFAS No. 153.

Reclassifications. Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on consolidated net loss.

Comprehensive loss equaled net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as we no longer have foreign operations. Comprehensive loss was $41.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, which consisted of net loss ($40.9 million) and foreign currency translation adjustments.

On May 10, 2004 and June 25, 2004, we acquired the 366-room Ritz-Carlton, Pentagon City in Arlington, Virginia and the 485-room Marriott Irvine in Orange County, California, respectively, for a total purchase price of $185.5 million, plus net acquisition costs and adjustments of $0.9 million.

The acquisitions were accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and the assets and liabilities and results of operations of the hotels have been consolidated in our financial statements since the date of purchase. On an unaudited pro forma basis, revenues, net income and basic and diluted loss per unit for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 would have been reported as follows if the acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of each of the respective periods (in thousands, except per unit amounts):

For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we capitalized interest of $2.7 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

We incurred no impairment losses during the first quarter of 2005. During the first quarter of 2004, we recognized impairment losses of $5.0 million, of which $4.8 million is recorded in discontinued operations as of March 31, 2005 (see Note 11).

The impairment charges recorded during the first quarter of 2004 were triggered by an expectation that a property would be sold significantly before the end of its estimated useful life. The impairment charges were based on our estimates of the fair value of the properties we were actively marketing based on available market data. These estimates required us to make assumptions about the sales prices that we expected to realize for each property as well as the timing of a potential sale. In making these estimates, we considered the operating results of the assets, the market for comparable properties, and quotes from brokers, among other information. In nearly all cases, our estimates reflected the results of an extensive marketing effort and negotiations with prospective buyers. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

Investment in Radisson Lexington Avenue Hotel. On October 1, 2004, we acquired a 49.99% interest in the 705-room Radisson Lexington Avenue Hotel in Midtown Manhattan. We made a total investment of $50 million, which includes a $40 million mezzanine loan that matures on October 1, 2014 and yields $5.8 million of cumulative annual interest, and a $10 million equity interest in the hotel. The mezzanine loan is secured by a pledge of the equity interests held by the borrower in an indirect parent of the owner of the hotel, and has a 10-year term. The loan is subordinate to $150 million in senior notes, but has priority over all equity interests.

Our equity investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting, in accordance with our accounting policies as described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The interest income from the loan, as well as the income related to the 49.99% share in profits and losses, is recorded in a separate line item “equity in income/loss of and interest earned from unconsolidated affiliates” within operating activities as the operations of this investment are integral to our operations. As of March 31, 2005, we recognized interest income of $1.4 million on the mezzanine loan, which is recognized as earned. Our outstanding loan balance of $40.4 million includes $0.4 million unamortized origination costs associated with the loan. Our initial equity investment balance of $10.1 million includes $0.1 million of external costs incurred. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we recognized $1.3 million of equity in losses on our equity investment.

Investment in MIP. In 1999, we invested $40 million in MeriStar Investment Partners, L.P. (“MIP”), a joint venture established to acquire upscale, full-service hotels. Our cost-basis investment is in the form of a limited partnership interest, in which we earned (through December 9, 2004) a 16% cumulative preferred return with outstanding balances compounded quarterly. In accordance with MIP’s December 2004 amended and restated partnership agreement, the return on our investment and on our remaining unpaid accrued preferred return was reduced to a 12% annual cumulative return rate, and subordinate only to the MIP debt; and $12.5 million of our $40 million investment was upgraded to receive preference in liquidation over all other investments.

During the fourth quarter of 2003, we recognized a $25.0 million impairment loss on this investment since, at that time, the decline in the underlying value of our investment was deemed other than temporary. As of March 31, 2005, the book value of the original investment is $15.0 million.

In February 2005, MIP completed a $175 million commercial mortgage-backed securities financing, secured by its portfolio of eight hotels. Upon the completion of the financing in February 2005, we received a distribution of $15.5 million, which was applied to reduce our outstanding accrued preferred returns receivable to approximately $4 million.

As of March 31, 2005, our total MIP carrying value was $20.7 million, consisting of the $15.0 million adjusted investment balance and $5.7 million of accrued preferred returns receivable.

We recognize our preferred return quarterly as it becomes due to us. The income, net of related expense, if any, is recorded in the “Equity in income/loss of and interest earned from unconsolidated affiliates” line within operating activities as the operations of this investment are integral to our operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized a preferred return of $1.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, from this investment. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, cumulative preferred returns of $5.7 million and $19.7 million, respectively, were due from MIP. We expect that any cumulative unpaid preferred returns will be paid in the future from excess cash flow above our current return and from potential partnership hotel disposition proceeds in excess of debt allocated to individual assets. We evaluate the collectibility of our preferred return based on our preference to distributions and the underlying value of the hotel properties.

Long-term debt and notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality consisted of the following (in thousands):

Aggregate future maturities as of March 31, 2005 were as follows (in thousands):

Notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we repurchased, using available cash, $1.49 million of our notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality (plus $0.06 million of accrued interest). We recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.06 related to this activity.

Mortgage and other debt. On January 26, 2005, we entered into a $37.7 million mortgage loan on our Hilton Crystal City hotel that bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.84%. The mortgage requires interest only payments for the first three years and then monthly payments of interest and principal over the remaining portion of the ten year term of the loan, with the majority of the principal balance paid at the end of the ten year term. Our net proceeds of $34.7 million are net of a $3 million escrow reserve for future capital expenditures. We incurred financing costs of $0.8 million related to this mortgage.

Derivatives. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the fair value of our interest rate swap was approximately an $11.4 million liability and $4.7 million liability, respectively. This amount is recorded on our consolidated balance sheet in the other liabilities line item with a corresponding debit recorded to long-term debt. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we earned net cash payments of $0.9 million under the swap, which were recorded as a reduction in interest expense. In conjunction with the interest rate swap, we have posted collateral of $18.9 million and $12.0 million as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, which is recorded as restricted cash. The required collateral amount fluctuates based on the changes in the swap rate and the amount of time left to maturity. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, our posted collateral ranged from $10.9 million to $18.9 million. However, due to the terms of the swap agreement, our posted collateral must be a minimum amount calculated per the agreement, which was $6.3 million as of March 31, 2005. We will receive all remaining collateral upon maturity of the swap.

OP Units. Our operating partnership agreement provides for five classes of partnership interests: Common OP Units, Class B OP Units, Class C OP Units, Class D OP Units and Profits-Only OP Units, or POPs.

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, MeriStar Hospitality awarded 133,937 shares of common stock to employees, with a value of $1.0 million, related to our annual incentive plan for 2004. Of these shares, 63,935 were repurchased as treasury stock to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements, and 70,002 shares were issued. In conjunction with this award, we issued 70,002 OP Units to MeriStar Hospitality. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we issued 3,430 OP Units to MeriStar Hospitality in conjunction with their issuance shares of common stock with a value of $0.03 million, related to shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan.

No Common OP Units were converted into common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2005. Common OP Unit holders converted 3,686 of their OP Units, with a value of $0.02 million into common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2004. A POPs unit holder converted 15,000 POPs for cash during the three months ended March 31, 2004.

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted loss per unit (in thousands, except per unit amounts):

In the course of document review with respect to the MIP restructuring, MeriStar Hospitality discovered a potential technical REIT qualification issue relating to a wholly-owned subsidiary of MIP, of which we are deemed to own a de minimis proportionate share. In order to eliminate any uncertainty regarding this issue, MeriStar Hospitality is currently negotiating a closing agreement with the Internal Revenue Service to resolve all REIT qualification matters with respect to this potential issue. As a partnership for federal income tax purposes, we are not directly affected by the outcome of the discussions by MeriStar Hospitality with the Internal Revenue Service.

As part of our asset renovation program, we have entered into contractual obligations with vendors to acquire capital assets and perform renovations totaling approximately $46.1 million to be expended over the next 12 months. Additionally, we have entered into contractual obligations related to capital expenditures as a result of hurricanes in the amount of $25.8 million to be expended over the next 12 months, most of which we expect to reimbursed by our insurance carriers.

No hotels were disposed of in the three months ended March 31, 2005. We disposed of 11 hotels in the three months ended March 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, none of our hotels met our criteria for held-for-sale classification. Operating results for the sold hotels, and where applicable, the gain or loss on final disposition, are included in discontinued operations.

Summary financial information included in discontinued operations for these hotels were as follows (in thousands):

Loss on disposal resulted primarily from the recognition of termination fees payable to Interstate with respect to these hotels’ management contracts.

Certain of our subsidiaries and MeriStar Hospitality are guarantors of senior unsecured notes. Certain of our subsidiaries are guarantors of MeriStar Hospitality’s unsecured subordinated notes. All guarantees are full and unconditional, and joint and several. Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q presents our supplementary consolidating financial statements, including each of the guarantor subsidiaries. This exhibit presents our consolidating balance sheets as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, consolidating statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and consolidating statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements, which are based on various assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identified by our use of words such as “intend,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “continue,” “potential,” “opportunity,” and similar expressions, whether in the negative or affirmative. We cannot guarantee that we actually will achieve these plans, intentions or expectations. All statements regarding our expected financial position, business and financing plans are forward-looking statements.

Except for historical information, matters discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to:

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating any forward-looking statements contained in this report or incorporated by reference herein. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are qualified by the cautionary statements in this section. We undertake no obligation to update or publicly release any revisions to forward-looking statements to reflect events, circumstances or changes in expectations after the date of this report.

MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Company”) is the subsidiary operating partnership of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation Commission file number 1-11903, (“MeriStar Hospitality,” which is a real estate investment trust, or REIT) and owns a portfolio of primarily upper upscale, full-service hotels and resorts in the United States. Our portfolio is diversified geographically as well as by franchise and brand affiliations. As of March 31, 2005, we owned 73 hotels with 20,319 rooms. Our hotels are located in major metropolitan areas, rapidly growing secondary markets or resort locations in the United States. All of our hotels are leased by our taxable subsidiaries. 71 of these hotels were managed by Interstate Hotels & Resorts (“Interstate”), one hotel was managed by The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC (“Ritz-Carlton”), a subsidiary of Marriott International, Inc., and one hotel was managed by another subsidiary (“Marriott”) of Marriott International, Inc. (collectively with Interstate and Ritz-Carlton, the “Managers”).

Since the July 2002 merger that formed Interstate, we and Interstate have separated the senior management teams of the two companies in order to allow each senior management team to devote more attention to its respective company’s matters. During July 2004, we concluded negotiations with Interstate to terminate the intercompany agreement. In exchange for terminating the intercompany agreement, we received, among other things:

The termination of the intercompany agreement eliminates the last element of our original “paper clip” relationship with Interstate.

Separately, we reached an agreement with Interstate regarding the calculation of termination fees payable upon a sale. Although termination fees for the properties that have been disposed of or were expected to be disposed of under our previously announced disposition program (which includes one of the 73 properties we owned as of March 31, 2005) will be unchanged, we received a $2.5 million credit, which is applicable to fees payable with respect to future dispositions. Of the $2.5 million credit, $2.4 million has been applied to terminations that occurred during 2004.

In January 2005, we notified Interstate that 11 hotels with 3,655 rooms had apparently failed to meet the performance test involving two year operating results versus budgets for those years. We and Interstate are currently in discussions relating to the apparent shortfall, the reasons for such shortfall, and any remedies that are available to us.

We believe that we are in the midst of the early stages of a lodging industry economic recovery; however, the recovery is not uniform throughout the country. Certain of our markets are performing well, while others have not yet recovered. Our strategy currently includes the following key initiatives: focus on growth of earnings and cash flow from our existing portfolio using an aggressive asset management program; upgrade our portfolio through extensive renovations; recycle capital into higher yielding hotel investments; improve our capital structure to support internal growth, position the Company for external opportunities and increase our fixed charges coverage; increase shareholder value; and maintain liquidity.

We are in the process of upgrading the product quality and growth potential of our hotels through our aggressive capital expenditure program and selective brand conversions. We have continued to reshape our portfolio through three strategic, high-quality acquisitions, including one investment completed in October 2004, and dispositions of a number of lower yielding properties. We may continue to reposition our portfolio and recycle capital through investing in current or new assets, funded by dispositions of assets, where we see an opportunity to increase our return on investment and financial results.

We have developed a targeted renovation program that is designed to reduce the time and cost required to renovate hotels, allowing us to improve the quality of our hotels faster to take advantage of the rebound in the economy and better manage the disruptions associated with renovations. We accelerated our renovation program for certain key assets, which created some short-term disruption but also positioned these properties to participate more quickly in the lodging industry recovery. We invested approximately $134 million in capital expenditures during 2004. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we invested approximately $39 million in non hurricane-related capital expenditures and expect to invest an additional $61 million in non hurricane-related capital expenditures during the remainder of 2005 to enhance the quality of our portfolio to meet or exceed the standards of our primary brands – Hilton, Marriott, and Starwood – as well as to improve the competitiveness of these assets in their markets and enable them to more fully participate in the economic recovery. While hotel results are negatively impacted during renovations due to out of service rooms and limitations on the ability to sell other hotel services, we expect to have positioned these renovated properties well to be able to benefit from the economic recovery. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we invested approximately $17 million in hurricane-related capital expenditures. The total amount of hurricane-related capital expenditures has not yet been fully determined, however we anticipate it to be well in excess of $100 million, most of which we expect to be reimbursed by our insurance carriers.

In August and September 2004, hurricanes caused substantial damage to a number of our hotels located in Florida. The hurricane damage and local evacuation orders also caused significant business interruption at many of our Florida properties, including the complete closure of certain hotels. As a result, seven of our hotels were closed for an extended period of time, and five others were affected in varying degrees.

As of March 31, 2005, seven of our Florida properties remained substantially closed due to hurricane damage. As of May 2, 2005, six of these properties remained substantially closed. Additionally, as of March 31, 2005, two properties that suffered varying amounts of hurricane damage had certain rooms and conference facilities out of service. Where possible and in order to mitigate loss of revenues, some permanent repairs to damaged properties were deferred during the Florida “high season”, which generally lasts from late December through early April, in order to have facilities available to meet demand. These damaged facilities will be removed from service for permanent repairs at a later date. We have hired consultants to assess our business interruption claims and are currently negotiating with our insurance carriers regarding the amount of loss for income losses sustained. To the extent that we are entitled to a recovery under the insurance policies, we will recognize a receivable when it can be demonstrated that it is probable that such insurance recovery will be realized, and such receivable will then be reflected as a component of operating income. Any gain resulting from business interruption insurance for lost income will not be recognized until all contingencies related to the insurance recoveries are resolved and collection of the relevant payments is probable. These income recognition criteria will result in business interruption insurance recoveries being recorded in a period subsequent to the period that we experience lost income from the affected properties, resulting in fluctuations in our net income that may reduce the comparability of reported quarterly results for some periods into the future. Additionally, current year expenses will reflect reduced operating expenses and recoverable expenses recorded as recoveries, resulting in lower current year expenses as compared to prior year.

The following is a summary of hurricane-related activity recorded (in millions):

During the first quarter of 2004, the seven hotels that were completely or substantially closed realized $28.9 million in revenues. These hotels recognized $4.0 million of revenues during the first quarter of 2005.

Revenues from continuing operations were $191.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to $195.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The revenue decrease is primarily due to a disruption of all revenues at properties impacted by hurricanes in August and September 2004, partially offset by an increase of $3.59 in RevPAR at our comparable hotels (see “Results of Operations” for definition of comparable hotels), higher food and beverage revenues attributable to increased menu pricing in 2005 and revenues from our two hotels acquired during the second quarter of 2004. Hotel and other operating expenses were 4.4% lower compared to the same period in 2004, mainly due to the limited operations of certain of the hurricane-impacted properties. We incurred a $0.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared to a $5.9 million loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Additionally, our 2004 results include a $12.2 million loss realized at properties we no longer own.

Property taxes, insurance and other reflects no rental payments under the best efforts lease programs at two properties in the first quarter of 2005 due to the closure of hurricane-impacted properties.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Our revenues are derived from the operations of our hospitality properties, including room, food and beverage revenues, as well as from our leases of office, retail and parking rentals. Included in our operating income (but not in revenues) is our cumulative preferred return on our partnership interest in MIP, the interest income on our mezzanine loan to the Radisson Lexington Avenue Hotel and our equity in the income/loss on our Radisson Lexington Avenue Hotel investment. Operating costs include direct costs to run our hotels, management fees to Interstate and others for the management of our properties, depreciation of our properties, impairment charges, property tax and insurance, as well as sales, marketing and general and administrative costs. Our expenses also include interest on our debt, amortization of related debt-issuance costs and minority interest allocations, which represent the allocation of income and losses to outside investors for properties that are not wholly owned.

The provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144 require that current and prior period operating results of any asset that has been classified as held for sale or has been disposed of on or after January 1, 2002, including any gain or loss recognized on the sale, be recorded as discontinued operations. Accordingly, we have reclassified all prior periods presented to comply with this requirement. See Footnote 11, “Dispositions,” included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further information regarding the amounts reclassified.

Summary data for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (dollars in thousands, except operating data statistics):

Three months ended March 31, 2005 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2004

Our 73 properties in continuing operations include two properties acquired in 2004, two properties of which we intend to dispose, and seven properties in Florida that were significantly impacted by hurricanes that occurred in August and September 2004 and that remained closed or substantially closed in the first quarter of 2005. Operating results have been impacted by these events. For more information regarding the impact of these hurricanes, see “— Results Overview”. Because of these events, our total results are not comparable between years. In order to provide a useful comparison, where appropriate, this section includes discussion and analysis of our results as a whole and discussion and analysis of results of the 62 comparable hotels that were in normal operations for the current period and the prior year period. The seven Florida hotels that remained substantially closed in the first quarter of 2005, the two hotels of which we intend to dispose under our repositioning program, and the two hotels acquired in 2004, are excluded from the comparable hotels.

Total revenue. Because of the events noted above, our total revenue is not comparable between years. Total revenue decreased by $4.7 million or 2.4% in 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004. This decrease in revenue is primarily due to a disruption of all revenues at properties impacted by the hurricanes of 2004, partially offset by an increase in ADR and higher food and beverage revenues attributable to a strategy of increasing room rates and reducing our exposure to contract business paying lower rates, increased menu pricing in 2005 and revenues from our two hotels acquired during the second quarter of 2004. Overall ADR increased 2.7% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 when compared with the same period in 2004, primarily due to a focus on increasing business related to higher rate transient and corporate business, and away from lower paying groups, as well as overall increasing daily rates in general, and due to the acquisition of two higher rate properties in the second quarter of 2004, and the result of the industry benefiting from an increase in travel due to a general strengthening of the economy; this favorable impact on rooms revenue was offset by revenue losses from our hurricane-impacted hotels, which generally realize high RevPAR during the first quarter. The decrease in occupancy of 9.3% over the same period was due to rooms out of service as a result of the Florida hurricanes, the impact of having fewer available rooms due to hotel room renovations, as well as a focus on increasing daily rates, which resulted in lower group, contract, and internet sales. Approximately 75% of the 9.3% decrease in occupancy was specifically due to the rooms out of service as a result of the Florida hurricanes.

* Occupancy and RevPAR have been adjusted for rooms out of service due to renovations.

For the 62 comparable hotels, total revenue increased by $5.2 million or 3.2% from $162.4 million in the first quarter of 2004 to $167.6 million in the first quarter of 2005. The increase in room revenue was primarily due to an increase in ADR of $8.12 or 8.1% and RevPAR of $3.59 or 5.1%, which resulted from a strategy of increasing room rates and reducing our exposure to contract business paying lower rates, and the general strengthening of the economy and lodging industry. Occupancy decreased 2.7% mainly due to the impact of having fewer available rooms due to hotel room renovations, as well as a focus on increasing business related to higher rate transient and corporate business, and away from lower paying groups, as well as overall increasing daily rates in general. Revenue growth was negatively impacted due to the short term effects of brand conversions and rooms out of service during renovations and as a result of the Florida hurricanes at our comparable hotels.

Hotel operating expenses. Because of the events noted above, our total hotel operating expenses are not comparable between years. Hotel operating expenses decreased by $1.8 million or 2.3% in the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The decrease was primarily attributable to the limited operation of certain of the hurricane-impacted properties, including the substantial closure of several properties. Food and beverage expense decreased by 2.8% of food and beverage revenue mainly due to menu pricing adjustments that have outpaced the increasing cost of labor and benefits. Rooms expense increased by 0.5% of rooms revenue mainly due to rising labor and benefits costs.

For the 62 comparable hotels, hotel operating expenses remained relatively flat from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2005, even though revenues increased, primarily due to a decrease in occupancy and occupancy-driven expenses, as we focused on increasing ADR.

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses include general and administrative expenses, property operating costs, depreciation and amortization, non-income taxes, and insurance. Individual variations in these expenses were as follows:

Losses on asset impairments. Due to the progress of our asset disposition program during 2004, losses from asset impairments were recorded during the first quarter of 2004. The portfolio remaining in the 2005 first quarter has experienced no further impairments or adjustments to holding periods.

Equity in income/loss of and interest earned from unconsolidated affiliates. Equity in income/loss of and interest earned from unconsolidated affiliates consists of income earned from two investments in which we own non-controlling interests and do not consolidate in our financial statements. We recognize a proportionate share of the profit and loss earned by the Radisson Lexington Avenue Hotel, an equity method investment acquired in 2004, as well as interest income on the $40 million loan made to this entity. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we recognized interest income of $1.4 million, offset by a $1.3 million equity share of net losses. In addition, we currently recognize a preferred return of 12% from our investment in MIP, accounted for using the cost method, resulting in current and cumulative preferred return income of $1.6 million in the first quarter of 2005. Our first quarter 2004 income of $1.6 million represents only the current portion of our 16% preferred return; no cumulative portion of the return was recognized.

Hurricane business interruption income. In the three months ended March 31, 2005, we recognized $2.3 million of business interruption income, based on insurance company acknowledgement of this minimum level of profit that six of our properties would have earned from the hurricane dates through March 31, 2005. For additional information regarding hurricane business interruption income, see “Results Overview – The August – September 2004 Hurricanes.”

Interest expense, net. Net interest expense declined 11.0% or $3.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily as a result of 2004 repurchases of approximately $99.6 million of senior unsecured notes and the issuance of common OP Units in 2004 in exchange for $49.2 million of notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality. The interest savings from these repurchases were somewhat offset by the placement of lower interest rate mortgages, and increases in LIBOR.

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, there were no discontinued operations, sales of assets, or assets classified as held for sale. Loss from discontinued operations for the same period in 2004 totaled $12.2 million, including impairment charges of $4.8 million, a loss on disposition of assets of $6.9 million, and an income tax benefit of $0.1 million.

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations, funds from borrowings, funds from the sales of assets and existing cash on hand. Our principal uses of cash include the funding of working capital obligations, debt service, debt repurchases, investments in hotels (including capital projects and acquisitions), and escrow requirements. Our debt strategy includes considering opportunities to repay debt and to reduce our overall cost of borrowing, such as through repaying more expensive debt with the proceeds from low interest rate mortgages and asset sales and the use of interest rate swaps. We believe we currently have sufficient cash on hand, and we expect to have adequate cash flow during the next twelve months in order to fund our operations, capital commitments and debt service obligations. MeriStar Hospitality did not pay a dividend on its common stock during 2004, nor does it expect to pay one in 2005. Our current and future liquidity is, however, greatly dependent upon our operating results, which are driven largely by overall economic conditions, and since September 11, 2001 have been significantly affected by geopolitical concerns and other factors affecting business and leisure travel. If general economic conditions are significantly worse than we expect for an extended period, this will likely have a negative effect on our projections of available cash flow and liquidity.

We generally intend to hold unrestricted cash balances of $40 million to $50 million in our operating accounts as a hedge against economic and geopolitical uncertainties, as well as to provide for our recurring cash requirements. We established a $50 million secured revolving bank line in December 2003, maturing in December 2006, which is fully available and increases our flexibility in managing our liquidity.

In 1999, we invested $40 million in MeriStar Investment Partners, L.P. (“MIP”), a joint venture established to acquire upscale, full-service hotels. Our cost-basis investment is in the form of a limited partnership interest, in which we earned (through December 9, 2004) a 16% cumulative preferred return with outstanding balances compounded quarterly. In accordance with MIP’s December 2004 amended and restated partnership agreement, the return on our investment and on our remaining unpaid accrued preferred return was reduced to a 12% annual cumulative return rate, and subordinate only to the MIP debt; and $12.5 million of our $40 million investment was upgraded to receive preference in liquidation over all other investments.

As of March 31, 2005, our total MIP carrying value was $20.7 million, consisting of the $15.0 million adjusted investment balance and $5.7 million of accrued preferred returns receivable.

We invested approximately $134 million in capital expenditures during 2004. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we invested approximately $39 million in non hurricane-related capital expenditures and expect to invest an additional $61 million in non hurricane-related capital expenditures during the remainder of 2005. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we invested approximately $17 million in hurricane-related capital expenditures. The total amount of hurricane-related capital expenditures has not yet been fully determined, however we anticipate it to be well in excess of $100 million, most of which we expect to be reimbursed by our insurance carriers.

As part of our strategy to manage our leverage, we have retired debt with higher interest rates and acquired debt with lower interest rates. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we repurchased, using available cash, $1.49 million of our notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality (plus $0.06 million of accrued interest). Following these repurchases, we had $32.7 million of outstanding notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality due 2007. In 2004, we retired $49.2 million of our notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality and purchased $99.6 million of our senior unsecured notes. These transactions have allowed us to reduce our cost of borrowing and improve our credit statistics. We will continue to review opportunities to reduce our debt and cost of borrowing through debt repurchases.

On January 26, 2005, we entered into a $37.7 million mortgage loan on our Hilton Crystal City hotel that bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.84%. The mortgage requires interest only payments for the first three years and then monthly payments of interest and principal over the remaining portion of the ten year term of the loan, with the majority of the principal balance paid at the end of the ten year term. Our net proceeds of $34.7 million are net of a $3 million escrow reserve for future capital expenditures. We incurred financing costs of $0.8 million related to this mortgage.

We may look to use additional mortgage capacity permitted under our bond indentures to raise low interest rate, long-term secured debt with the proceeds used to repay more expensive debt and to fund capital investments in new or existing properties.

We may from time to time receive offers from potential acquirers of our hotel assets. We consider and evaluate any such opportunities that have the potential to improve our financial condition or results of operations through further repositioning our portfolio and recycling of capital. Proceeds from asset dispositions would most likely be reinvested into high yielding projects in our existing portfolio or used to fund debt repurchases or acquire assets with higher returns.

In August and September 2004, a number of our hotels located in Florida incurred substantial damage and business interruption. While we have comprehensive insurance coverage for both property damage and business interruption, we are experiencing a decline in revenues due to the full or partial closure of certain hotels, and accounting rules do not permit us to recognize any income from business interruption insurance or gains on replacement of damaged property until all contingencies associated with the related insurance payments have been resolved. Additionally, we may experience a timing delay between cash outflows and cash inflows, as we may incur costs to rebuild the damaged properties, and temporary negative cash flows associated with affected properties, that may not be reimbursed by the insurance carriers for several periods. Additionally, we are liable for any policy deductibles. While this timing difference may have some impact on our short term liquidity, we believe that we will be able to meet all of our short term cash needs through a variety of means, including reducing capital expenditures, borrowings under our credit facility and the placement of mortgages, if necessary. For more information regarding the impact of these hurricanes, see “—Results Overview.”

As of March 31, 2005, we had $62.9 million of cash held in escrow, which was required by certain debt agreements and the interest rate swap agreement. Our cash balance held in escrow may increase or decrease based upon the performance of our encumbered hotels, our ability to obtain timely capital reimbursements, and the fair value of our interest rate swap. Of the $62.9 million, approximately $27.4 million was available to fund capital expenditures as of March 31, 2005.

The following table shows our consolidated cash flows, generated by (used in) our various activities, for the three months ended March 31 (in thousands):

Cash flow from operations increased in the first quarter of 2005, primarily due to the impact of margin improvements due to the refocusing of our portfolio assets, as well as the generation of new revenues from our hotels acquired in 2004, and as a result of the lodging industry economic recovery.

We used a net $60.2 million of cash for investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2005, consisting of:

Our investing activities provided a net $44.9 million of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2004, resulting primarily from:

We generated a net $32.0 million of cash from financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 due mainly to:

We used a net $78.0 million of cash for financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2004 due mainly to $77.8 million in repayments and repurchases of debt.

MeriStar Hospitality must distribute to stockholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains, to preserve the favorable tax treatment accorded to REITs under the Internal Revenue Code. MeriStar Hospitality, as our general partner, must use its best efforts to ensure our partnership distributions meet this requirement. Under certain circumstances, MeriStar Hospitality may be required to make distributions in excess of cash available for distribution in order to meet the Internal Revenue Code requirements. In that event, we and/or MeriStar Hospitality would seek to borrow additional funds or sell additional non-core assets for cash,

or both, to the extent necessary to obtain cash sufficient to make the distributions required to retain MeriStar Hospitality’s qualification as a REIT. Any future distributions will be at the discretion of MeriStar Hospitality’s board of directors and will be determined by factors including our operating results, restrictions imposed by our borrowing agreements, capital expenditure requirements, the economic outlook, the distribution requirements for REITs under the Internal Revenue Code and such other factors as its board of directors deems relevant. MeriStar Hospitality’s senior unsecured notes indenture permits the payment of dividends in order to maintain REIT qualification when we fall below a 2 to 1 fixed charge coverage ratio. However, MeriStar Hospitality’s senior subordinated notes indenture is more restrictive in that it permits the payment of dividends only if we exceed the 2 to 1 fixed charge coverage ratio. The timing and amount of any future distributions is dependent upon these factors, and we cannot provide assurance that any such distributions will be made in the future.

Long-term debt and notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality consisted of the following (in thousands):

respectively, which is recorded as restricted cash. The required collateral amount fluctuates based on the changes in the swap rate and the amount of time left to maturity. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, our posted collateral ranged from $10.9 million to $18.9 million. However, due to the terms of the swap agreement, our posted collateral must be a minimum amount calculated per the agreement, which was $6.3 million as of March 31, 2005. We will receive all remaining collateral upon maturity of the swap.

During 2004, we invested in three properties, each of them having exceptional quality and exhibiting superior growth potential, and being located in three of the top performing markets in the country. We believe these factors will enable these investments to produce superior returns for our shareholders. Our two consolidated hotels, and while not consolidated into our results, the hotel for which we record equity in income/loss, realized three months ended March 31, 2005 combined RevPAR of $129.39. RevPAR for our comparable hotels during the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $71.66. The higher RevPAR of the acquired hotels is indicative of their quality and overall earnings power.

On May 10, 2004 we acquired the four-star, four-diamond rated Ritz-Carlton, Pentagon City in Arlington, Virginia for a purchase price of $93 million. The 366-room luxury hotel is operated by The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC under a long-term contract. The hotel features nearly 18,000 square feet of meeting space, which can accommodate meetings of up to 900 guests.

Additionally, on June 25, 2004, we acquired the 485-room Marriott Irvine in Orange County, California, for a purchase price of $92.5 million. The hotel is operated by a subsidiary of Marriott International, Inc. under a long-term contract. The hotel features 30,000 square feet of meeting space, including a 13,000 square foot ballroom, that can accommodate meetings of up to 1,500 guests.

On October 1, 2004, we acquired a 49.99% interest in the 705-room Radisson Lexington Avenue Hotel in Midtown Manhattan. We made a total investment of $50 million, which includes a $40 million mezzanine loan that matures on October 1, 2014 and yields $5.8 million of cumulative annual interest, and a $10 million equity interest in the hotel. The mezzanine loan is secured by a pledge of the equity interests held by the borrower in an indirect parent of the owner of the hotel, and has a 10-year term. The loan is subordinate to $150 million in senior notes, but has priority over all equity interests.

We will continue to be highly selective with potential acquisitions, focusing primarily on larger properties located in major urban markets or high-end resort destinations with high barriers to new competition, premium brand affiliations, significant meeting space and superior growth potential. The terms of our senior note indentures may limit our ability to obtain financing to acquire assets beyond certain limited exceptions (including up to $300 million of mortgage indebtedness, of which $194.7 million was available at March 31, 2005, and $50 million of general indebtedness) as we are below the required fixed charge coverage ratio of 2 to 1, at which level we would be permitted to generally incur debt without restriction.

We have substantially completed our previously announced portfolio repositioning disposition program that repositioned our portfolio into one generally consisting of larger assets with significant meeting space operated under major brands in urban or high-end resort locations. Between January 1, 2003 and March 31, 2005, we disposed of 36 hotels with 8,109 rooms for total gross proceeds of $283.6 million in cash and $11.1 million in reduction of debt. Of these 36 hotels, 15 hotels were disposed of in 2003 and 21 hotels were disposed of in 2004. The reshaping of our portfolio has contributed to an increase in RevPAR, which, for our entire portfolio of properties (both quarters exclude seven properties affected by hurricanes in 2004 and closed during the first quarter of 2005), increased to $72.83 from $64.07 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

In addition, we may from time to time receive offers on other assets that we might consider selling. We would consider any opportunities that have the potential to improve our financial condition or results of operations through further repositioning our portfolio and recycling of capital. Proceeds from asset dispositions would be reinvested into our portfolio through renovation activities and new investments, or used to fund debt repurchases.

We have developed a targeted renovation program that is designed to reduce the time and cost required to renovate hotels, allowing us to improve the quality of our hotels faster to take advantage of the rebound in the economy and better manage the disruptions associated with renovations. We accelerated our renovation program for certain key assets, which created some short-term disruption but also positioned these properties to participate more quickly in the lodging industry recovery. We make ongoing capital expenditures in order to keep our hotels competitive in their markets and to comply with franchise obligations, as described further in “Operating Risks” (the potential adverse impact of our failure to meet the requirements contained in our franchise and licensing agreements) included in Item 1 – Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2004. Additionally, certain of our hotels’ management contracts and franchise agreements contain reserve requirements for property improvements. We fund our capital expenditures primarily from cash generated from operations and existing cash on hand and intend to use a portion of the proceeds from the sales of assets to provide capital for renovation work. We invested approximately $134 million in capital expenditures during 2004. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we invested approximately $39 million in non hurricane-related capital expenditures and expect to invest an additional $61 million in non hurricane-related capital expenditures during the remainder of 2005. The emphasis is on completing these projects on budget with minimal disruptions to operations. We focus on complete room and facility renovations, eliminating to the degree possible, piecemeal work where the typical consumer might not ascribe value to the improvements. We believe we are timing this work appropriately to take full advantage of the economic recovery. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we invested approximately $17 million in hurricane-related capital expenditures. The total amount of hurricane-related capital expenditures has not yet been fully determined, however we anticipate it to be well in excess of $100 million, most of which we expect to be reimbursed by our insurance carriers.

While we expect the insurance proceeds will be sufficient to cover most of the replacement cost of the restoration of these hotels, certain deductibles (primarily windstorm) and limitations will apply. Moreover, while we are receiving and expect to continue to receive interim insurance payments, no determination has been made as to the total amount or timing of those insurance payments, and those insurance payments may not be sufficient to cover the costs of all the restoration of the hotels. To the extent that insurance proceeds, which are on a replacement cost basis, ultimately exceed the net book value of the damaged property, a gain will be recorded in the period when all contingencies related to the insurance claim have been resolved and the relevant payments have been received.

As a result of the damage caused by the hurricanes, our properties experienced varying periods of business interruption and impacts on operations, including closure of certain hotels. Where possible and in order to mitigate loss of revenues, some permanent repairs to damaged properties were deferred during the Florida “high season”, which generally lasts from late December through early April, in order to have facilities available to meet demand. These damaged facilities will be removed from service for permanent repairs at a later date. We have hired consultants to assess our business interruption claims and are currently negotiating with our insurance carriers regarding the amount of loss for income losses sustained. To the extent that we are entitled to a recovery under the insurance policies, we will recognize a receivable when it can be demonstrated that it is probable that such insurance recovery will be realized, and such receivable will then be reflected as a

component of operating income. Any gain resulting from business interruption insurance for lost income will not be recognized until all contingencies related to the insurance recoveries are resolved and collection of the relevant payments is probable. These income recognition criteria will result in business interruption insurance recoveries being recorded in a period subsequent to the period that we experience lost income from the affected properties, resulting in fluctuations in our net income that may reduce the comparability of reported quarterly results for some periods into the future.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” which requires companies to recognize compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions, and measure that cost based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. We are required to comply with the provisions of this statement beginning with the first quarter of 2006. We do not expect the adoption of this revised standard to have a material effect on our accounting treatment for share-based payments, as we adopted the transition provisions of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” on January 1, 2003 and elected to recognize compensation expense for options granted subsequent to December 31, 2002 under the fair-value-based method.

Our interest rate risk management objective is to manage the effect of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows. We look to manage interest rates through the use of a combination of fixed and variable rate debt. To achieve our objectives, we may borrow at a combination of fixed and variable rates, and may enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We only enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for hedging purposes, and not for trading purposes. We do not engage in speculative transactions.

On April 2, 2004, we entered into an interest rate swap on our secured facility due 2009, effectively converting the interest the facility bears from a fixed rate to a floating rate. Under the swap, we receive fixed-rate payments of 8.01% and pay floating rate payments based on a one month LIBOR plus 444 basis points on an initial $307 million notional amount.

We have designated the interest rate swap as a fair value hedge for financial reporting purposes and the amounts paid or received under the swap agreement will be recognized over the life of the agreement as an adjustment to interest expense. Changes in the fair value of the swap and the secured facilities are reflected in the balance sheet as offsetting changes and have no income statement effect. The fair value of the interest rate swap at March 31, 2005 was a liability of approximately $11.4 million, which is included in the other liabilities line item on our consolidated balance sheet.

In conjunction with the interest rate swap, we have posted collateral of $18.9 million and $12.0 million as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, which is recorded as restricted cash. The required collateral amount fluctuates based on the changes in the swap rate and the amount of time left to maturity. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, our posted collateral ranged from $10.9 million to $18.9 million. However, due to the terms of the swap agreement, our posted collateral must be a minimum amount calculated per the agreement, which was $6.3 million as of March 31, 2005. We will receive all remaining collateral upon maturity of the swap.

The table below provides information about our derivative financial instrument that is sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract and weighted average interest rates by expected (contractual) maturity dates for our interest rate swap. Weighted average interest rates and notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. Weighted average interest rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve as of March 31, 2005. The interest rate swap that we have entered into is strictly to hedge interest rate risk and not for trading purposes.

As a result of our interest rate swap, we are exposed to market risks related to changes in interest rates. In the future, we intend to manage our interest rate exposure using a mix of fixed and floating interest rate debt. A change in one month LIBOR of 50 basis points would result in an increase or decrease in current annual interest expense of approximately $1.5 million.

As of March 31, 2005, approximately 19% of our outstanding debt bears fixed rates of interest that have been effectively swapped from a fixed rate to a floating rate, with the remaining 81% of debt bearing fixed rates of interest.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and regulations, and that the information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial and chief accounting officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures based closely on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-1(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Also, we have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. As we do not control or manage these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to these entities are substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries.

As of March 31, 2005, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer, our chief financial officer, and our chief accounting officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


MERISTAR HOSPITALITY OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
MERISTAR HOSPITALITY FINANCE CORP.
MERISTAR HOSPITALITY FINANCE CORP. II
MERISTAR HOSPITALITY FINANCE CORP. III

BY:		MERISTAR HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
		ITS GENERAL PARTNER

By:		/s/ Donald D. Olinger
		Donald D. Olinger
		Executive Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer and
		Duly Authorized Officer


MERISTAR HOSPITALITY		MERISTAR HOSPITALITY
OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.		FINANCE CORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)		(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

75-2648837		52-2321015
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

MERISTAR HOSPITALITY		MERISTAR HOSPITALITY
FINANCE CORP II		FINANCE CORP III
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)		(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

73-1658708		46-0467463
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Consolidated Balance Sheets – March 31, 2005 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2004	3

	Consolidated Statements of Operations – Three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)	5

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	16

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	31

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	32

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	33

SIGNATURES		34


	March 31, 2005 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2004
ASSETS
Property and equipment	$	2,637,362		$	2,581,720
Accumulated depreciation		(530,049	)		(506,632	)

		2,107,313			2,075,088

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates		70,451			84,796
Prepaid expenses and other assets		34,045			34,230
Insurance claim receivable		60,896			76,056
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $358 and $691		40,506			32,979
Restricted cash		62,946			58,413
Cash and cash equivalents		53,863			60,533

	$	2,430,020		$	2,422,095

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Long-term debt	$	1,397,649		$	1,369,299
Notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality Corporation		202,528			203,977
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		66,144			71,781
Accrued interest		35,812			41,165
Due to Interstate Hotels & Resorts		18,045			21,799
Other liabilities		20,246			11,553

Total liabilities		1,740,424			1,719,574

Minority interests		2,422			2,418
Redeemable OP units at redemption value, 2,298 and 2,298 outstanding		16,085			19,187
Partners’ capital – Common OP units, 87,439 and 87,367 issued and outstanding		671,089			680,916

	$	2,430,020		$	2,422,095


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Revenue:
Hotel operations:
Rooms	$	125,995		$	129,992
Food and beverage		51,858			49,110
Other hotel operations		11,384			15,340
Office rental, parking and other revenue		1,858			1,368

Total revenue		191,095			195,810

Hotel operating expenses:
Rooms		31,359			31,686
Food and beverage		37,509			36,907
Other hotel operating expenses		7,116			9,475
Office rental, parking and other expenses		824			585
Other operating expenses:
General and administrative, hotel		32,105			32,264
General and administrative, corporate		3,533			3,882
Property operating costs		29,682			29,735
Depreciation and amortization		24,853			25,059
Property taxes, insurance and other		10,989			16,334
Loss on asset impairments		—			184

Operating expenses		177,970			186,111

Equity in income/loss of and interest earned from unconsolidated affiliates		1,634			1,600
Hurricane business interruption income		2,281			—

Operating income		17,040			11,299

Minority interest (expense) income		(5	)		4
Interest expense, net		(30,714	)		(34,502	)
Loss on early extinguishments of debt		(60	)		(5,923	)

Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations		(13,739	)		(29,122	)

Income tax (expense) benefit		(10	)		390

Loss from continuing operations		(13,749	)		(28,732	)

Discontinued operations:
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax		—			(12,220	)
Income tax benefit		—			65

Loss from discontinued operations		—			(12,155	)

Net loss	$	(13,749	)	$	(40,887	)

Preferred distributions		—			(141	)

Net loss applicable to common unitholders	$	(13,749	)	$	(41,028	)

Net loss applicable to general partner unitholders	$	(13,397	)	$	(39,250	)

Net loss applicable to limited partner unitholders	$	(352	)	$	(1,778	)

Basic and diluted loss per unit:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.40	)
Loss from discontinued operations		—			(0.17	)

Net loss per basic and diluted unit	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.57	)


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2005			2004
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(13,749	)	$	(40,887	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		24,824			26,702
Loss on asset impairments		—			5,011
Loss on sale of assets, before tax effect		—			6,946
Loss on early extinguishments of debt		60			5,923
Minority interests		5			(4	)
Equity in loss of unconsolidated affiliate		1,370			—
Amortization of unearned stock-based compensation		277			587
Deferred income taxes		—			(358	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		7,633			(2,767	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(112	)		4,920
Receivables from unconsolidated affiliates		13,004			(1,600	)
Due from/to Interstate Hotels & Resorts		(3,754	)		(5,461	)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, accrued interest and other liabilities		(8,024	)		(1,648	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		21,534			(2,636	)

Investing activities:
Capital expenditures for property and equipment		(55,642	)		(23,737	)
Proceeds from sales of assets		—			74,075
Increase in restricted cash		(4,533	)		(2,133	)
Costs associated with disposition program and other, net		—			(3,304	)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(60,175	)		44,901

Financing activities:
Prepayments on long-term debt		(1,531	)		(75,497	)
Scheduled payments on long-term debt		(2,731	)		(2,307	)
Proceeds from mortgage loan, net of financing costs		36,714			—
Distributions to minority investors		—			(141	)
Repurchase of limited partnership units		(507	)		—
Other		26			(77	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		31,971			(78,022	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			(150	)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(6,670	)		(35,907	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		60,533			230,876

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	53,863		$	194,969

Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest and income taxes:
Interest, net of capitalized interest	$	36,393		$	43,755
Income tax payments, net of (refunds)	$	10		$	(969	)

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality redeemed in exchange for Common OP Units	$	—		$	38,000
Redemption of OP units	$	—		$	20
Change of fair value of interest rate swap	$	6,750		$	—

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents


Fixed assets net book value write down	$	65.5
Recoverable costs incurred		56.4
Business interruption income		2.3
Payments received		(63.3	)

	$	60.9


	March 31, 2005		December 31, 2004
Land	$	244,088	$	244,088
Buildings and improvements		1,940,443		1,926,813
Furniture, fixtures and equipment		307,070		295,562
Construction-in-progress		145,761		115,257

	$	2,637,362	$	2,581,720


	March 31, 2005			December 31, 2004
Senior unsecured notes due 2011 – 9.125%	$	355,665		$	355,665
Senior unsecured notes due 2008 – 9.0%		270,500			270,500
Senior unsecured notes due 2009 – 10.5%		224,187			224,187
Secured facility, due 2009		301,388			302,979
Secured facility, due 2013		98,880			99,293
Mortgage and other debt		161,972			125,051
Unamortized issue discount		(3,519	)		(3,702	)

	$	1,409,073		$	1,373,973
Fair value adjustment for interest rate swap		(11,424	)		(4,674	)

Long-term debt	$	1,397,649		$	1,369,299

Notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality	$	202,740		$	204,225
Unamortized issue discount		(212	)		(248	)

Notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality	$	202,528		$	203,977

Total long-term debt and notes payable to MeriStar Hospitality	$	1,600,177		$	1,573,276


2005 (nine months)	$	8,414
2006		12,031
2007		45,523
2008		284,741
2009		503,526
Thereafter		757,366

	$	1,611,601
Fair value adjustment for interest rate swap		(11,424	)

	$	1,600,177


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2005		Three Months Ended March 31, 2004		Percent Change
Summary of Operations:
Total revenue from continuing operations	$	191,095	$	195,810	(2.4)	%

Hotel operating expenses		76,808		78,653	(2.3)
Other operating expenses		101,162		107,274	(5.7)
Loss on asset impairments		—		184	(100.0)

Total operating expenses		177,970		186,111	(4.4)

Equity in income/loss of and interest earned from unconsolidated affiliates		1,634		1,600	2.1
Hurricane business interruption income		2,281		—	>100.0

Operating income		17,040		11,299	50.1

Loss on extinguishments of debt		(60)		(5,923)	(99.0)
Minority interest		(5)		4	>(100.0)
Interest expense, net		(30,714)		(34,502)	(11.0)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(10)		390	>(100.0)

Loss from continuing operations		(13,749)		(28,732)	(52.1)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(a)		—		(12,155)	100.0

Net loss	$	(13,749)	$	(40,887)	(66.4)	%


	2005			2004			2005 vs 2004
Operating activities	$	21,534		$	(2,636	)	$	24,170
Investing activities		(60,175	)		44,901			(105,076	)
Financing activities		31,971			(78,022	)		109,993
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period – unrestricted		53,863			194,969			(141,106	)


	2005			2006			2007			2008			2009			Total			Fair Value as of 3/31/05
Interest Rate Derivative
Interest Rate Swap
Fixed to Variable	$	0.5		$	(2.6	)	$	(3.4	)	$	(3.8	)	$	(2.6	)	$	(11.9	)	$	(11.4	)
Average pay rate		7.62	%		8.74	%		9.06	%		9.22	%		9.32	%
Average receive rate		8.01	%		8.01	%		8.01	%		8.01	%		8.01	%


Exhibit No.		Description of Document
3.1		Certificate of Limited Partnership of MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 for MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. (File No. 333-63768) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 25, 2001).

3.2		Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 for MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. (File No. 333-63768) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 25, 2001).

3.3		Certificate of Incorporation of MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 for MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. (File No. 333-63768) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 25, 2001).

3.4		By-Laws of MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 for MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. and MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. (File No. 333-63768) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 25, 2001).

3.5		Certificate of Incorporation of MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and filed with the Commission on March 31, 2003).

3.6		By-Laws of MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and filed with the Commission on March 31, 2003).

3.7		Certificate of Incorporation of MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and filed with the Commission on March 31, 2003).

3.8		By-Laws of MeriStar Hospitality Finance Corp. III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and filed with the Commission on March 31, 2003).

13		Financial Statements of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2005. *

31.1		Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. *

31.2		Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. *

32.1		Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. *

32.2		Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. *

99.1		Consolidating Financial Information of MeriStar Hospitality Operating Partnership, L.P. *