Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

OR

Commission File Number 0-29480

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(360) 943-1500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date:

As of April 12, 2005 there were 5,973,940 common shares outstanding, with no par value, of the registrant.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

Table of Contents

ITEM 1. HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 3

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 4

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY FOR THE THREE

MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS

ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 AND 2004

(In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 5

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Page 6

Table of Contents

HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation

(a.) Description of Business

Heritage Financial Corporation is a bank holding company that was incorporated in the State of Washington in August 1997. We were organized for the purpose of acquiring all of the capital stock of Heritage Savings Bank upon our reorganization from a mutual holding company form of organization to a stock holding company form of organization. Effective September 1, 2004, Heritage Savings Bank switched its charter from a State Chartered Savings Bank to a State Chartered Commercial Bank and changed its legal name from Heritage Savings Bank to Heritage Bank.

We are primarily engaged in the business of planning, directing, and coordinating the business activities of our wholly owned subsidiaries: Heritage Bank and Central Valley Bank, N.A. Heritage Bank is a Washington state-chartered commercial bank whose deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) under the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF) and the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF). Heritage Bank conducts business from its main office in Olympia, Washington and its eleven branch offices located in Thurston, Pierce, and Mason Counties. Central Valley Bank, N.A. is a national bank whose deposits are insured by the FDIC under the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF). Central Valley Bank, N.A. conducts business from its main office in Toppenish, Washington and its five branch offices located in Yakima and Kittitas Counties.

Our business consists primarily of lending and deposit relationships with small businesses including agribusiness and their owners in our market area, attracting deposits from the general public and originating for sale or investment purposes first mortgage loans on residential properties located in western and central Washington. We also make residential construction loans, income property loans, and consumer loans.

(b.) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These consolidated financial statements should be read with our December 31, 2004 audited consolidated financial statements and its accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2005. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(c.) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123R). This Statement supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. This Statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. This Statement does not change the

Page 7

Table of Contents

accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in Statement 123 as originally issued and EITF Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” This Statement does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6, Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans. This Statement was effective for public entities that do not file as small business issuers—as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. Effective April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced the amendment to the compliance dates of this new rule. Therefore, this statement is effective beginning at the next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period, that begins after June 15, 2005, or December 15, 2005 for small business issuers. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R and expects the adoption will have an impact on the consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. The Company has not determined the method of adoption or the effect of adopting SFAS No. 123R.

The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.” In connection with its discussion of EITF Issue No. 02-14, “Whether the Equity Method of Accounting Applies When an Investor Does Not Have an Investment in Voting Stock of an Investee but Exercises Significant Influence through Other Means,” at the November 21, 2002 meeting, the Task Force discussed the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to certain investments carried at cost. The Task Force requested that the FASB staff consider other impairment models within U.S. GAAP when developing its views. At the November 25, 2003 EITF meeting, the Board ratified a consensus that certain quantitative and qualitative disclosures for periods ending after December 15, 2003 should be required for securities accounted for under Statement 115 that are impaired at the balance sheet date but for which an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized. FASB has delayed the effective date of paragraph 10-20 of Issue 03-1. This delay does not suspend the requirement to recognize other-than-temporary impairments as required by existing authoritative literature. Application of this Interpretation did not have a material effect on our financial statements.

In December 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addressed how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaces FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which was issued in January 2003. The Company is required to apply FIN 46R to variable interests in variable interest entities (VIEs) created after December 31, 2003. For VIEs created before January 1, 2004, the Interpretation was applied beginning on January 1, 2005. Application of this Interpretation did not have an effect on our financial statements.

Page 8

Table of Contents

NOTE 2. Stockholders’ Equity

(a.) Earnings per Share

The following table illustrates the reconciliation of weighted average shares used for earnings per share for the noted periods.

As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, there were no anti-dilutive shares outstanding related to options to acquire common stock.

(b.) Cash Dividend Declared

On March 24, 2005, we announced a quarterly cash dividend of 17.5 cents per share payable on April 28, 2005 to stockholders of record on April 15, 2005.

Page 9

Table of Contents

NOTE 3. Stock Based Compensation

The Company measures its employee stock-based compensation arrangements using the provisions outlined in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which is an intrinsic value-based method of recognizing compensation costs. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of FAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. As most of the Company’s stock options have no intrinsic value at grant date, compensation cost generally has not been recognized for its stock option plan activity. However, compensation expense was recognized during 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 resulting from restricted stock awards and certain incentive stock options. If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under its plans, consistent with the method prescribed by FAS No. 123, net income and earnings per share would have been changed to the pro forma amounts for the following periods:

The compensation expense included in the pro forma net income is not likely to be representative of the effect on reported net income for future years because options vest over several years and additional awards generally are made each year.

The fair value of options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model. The following assumptions were used to calculate the fair value of the options granted:

Page 10

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of the Company. The information contained in this section should be read with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and its accompanying notes, and the December 31, 2004 audited consolidated financial statements and its accompanying notes included in our recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Statements concerning future performance, developments or events, expectations for growth and market forecasts, and any other guidance on future periods, constitute forward-looking statements and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, which might cause actual results to differ materially from stated expectations. Specific factors include, but are not limited to, the effect of interest rate changes, risks associated with acquisition of other banks and opening new branches, the ability to control costs and expenses, and general economic conditions. Additional information on these and other factors, which could affect our financial results, are included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Overview

Heritage Financial Corporation is a bank holding company, which primarily engages in the business activities of our wholly owned subsidiaries: Heritage Bank and Central Valley Bank. We provide financial services to our local communities with an ongoing strategic focus in expanding our commercial lending relationships, market expansion and a continual focus on asset quality. Effective January 8, 1998, our common stock began to trade on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “HFWA”.

Financial Condition Data

Total assets increased $5.7 million (0.8%) to $703.0 million as of March 31, 2005 from the December 31, 2004 balance of $697.3 million. Deposits increased $22.0 million (3.7%) to $609.3 million as of March 31, 2005 from the December 31, 2004 balance of $587.3 million. For the same period, net loans, which include loans held for sale but are net of the allowance for loan losses, increased $9.2 million (1.6%) to $600.7 million as of March 31, 2005 from the December 31, 2004 balance of $591.5 million. Commercial loans increased by $2.3 million to $338.5 million as of March 31, 2005 from the December 31, 2004 balance of $336.2 million. Commercial loans continue to be the largest segment of loans at 55.6% and 56.1% as a percentage of total loans as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

As of March 31, 2005, we have repurchased a total of 5,589,540 shares, or 51.5% of the total outstanding at March 31, 1999, which was the inception of our stock repurchase programs, at an average price of $12.65 per share. We began our current 5% repurchase program on August 2, 2004 with the goal to repurchase approximately 295,000 shares. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, we repurchased 10,349 shares at an average price of $21.72. We have repurchased 20,049 shares under the eighth program at an average price of $21.31.

Earnings Summary

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $0.42 per diluted share compared to $0.35 per diluted share for the same period last year. Actual earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were $2,563,000 compared to $2,219,000 for the same period in 2004, an increase of 15.5%.

Return on average equity for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 improved to 16.28% from 14.13% for the same period last year. Average equity increased by $0.2 million to $63.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 versus $62.8 million for the same period last year while net income increased by $344,000.

Page 11

Table of Contents

Net Interest Income

Net interest income before provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased 8.0% to $8,323,000 from $7,707,000 for the same quarter in 2004. The net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest earning assets) decreased to 5.10% for the current quarter from 5.15% for the same quarter last year. One of the methods in which we have been able to maintain our net interest margin above 5.0% is our continued focus on increasing noninterest bearing deposits. Noninterest bearing deposits averaged $81.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 versus $69.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, an increase of 17.0%. Continuing to maintain a margin over 5.0% will be a challenge this year. Short-term interest rates have increased at a much faster pace than longer term interest rates over the last several months. As a result, our net interest margin has narrowed.

Interest income increased $1.3 million, or 13.4%, for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the first quarter last year and interest expense increased $0.6 million, or 3.8%, during this same period. Loans averaged $597.9 million with an average yield of 6.82% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to average loans of $521.4 million with an average yield of 6.77% for the same period in 2004. Certificates of deposit averaged $243.5 million with an average cost of 2.41% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $210.9 million with an average cost of 1.93% for the same period in 2004.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $165,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, which was $15,000 less than the provision for loan losses during the first quarter of 2004. The provision for loan losses during the fourth quarter of 2004 was $135,000. The provision for loan losses increase was primarily due to increased loan volumes.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income decreased 5.6% to $1,476,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared with $1,563,000 for the same quarter in 2004. The decrease is the result of declines in mortgage banking income in the amount of $218,000. Management expects modest levels of mortgage banking activity to continue for the remainder of the year. We did experience increases in merchant visa income in the amount of $97,000 for a total of $488,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 from $391,000 in the quarter ended March 31, 2004 due to volume increases.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense increased 1.1% to $5,826,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to $5,764,000 for the same period during 2004. Salaries and employee benefits decreased by $81,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period last year. A portion of the salaries and employee benefits reduction in the first quarter is the result of staff turnover creating vacant positions. Merchant visa expense increased $62,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period last year.

The efficiency ratio for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was 59.45% compared to 62.18% for the comparable quarter in 2004. The efficiency ratio decreases are primarily a result of strong net interest income and modest noninterest expense increases for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. The efficiency ratio consists of noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income before provision for loan losses plus noninterest income.

Page 12

Table of Contents

Lending Activities

As indicated in the table below, total loans (including loans held for sale) increased to $608.6 million at March 31, 2005 from $599.8 million at December 31, 2004.

Nonperforming Assets

The following table describes our nonperforming assets for the dates indicated.

Page 13

Table of Contents

Nonperforming assets increased to $445,000, or 0.06% of total assets at March 31, 2005 from $319,000, or 0.05% of total assets at December 31, 2004. We believe that we are adequately reserved for losses in the portfolio as of March 31, 2005. Potential problem loans are those loans that are currently accruing interest, but which are considered possible credit problems because financial information of the borrowers causes us concerns as to their ability to comply with the present repayment program and could result in placing the loan on nonaccrual.

Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses

Management maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb estimated credit losses associated with the loan and lease portfolio, including all binding commitments to lend. We determine the allowance through our ongoing quarterly loan quality assessments.

We assess the estimated credit losses inherent in our non-classified loan portfolio by considering a number of elements including:

We determine the allowance for the non-classified portion of our loan portfolio based on an appropriate percentage risk factor that is calculated based on the above-noted elements and trends. We add specific provisions for each classified loan after a careful analysis of that loan’s credit and collateral factors. Our analysis of the allowance combines the provisions made for both our non-classified loans and the specific provisions made for classified loans.

Loan reviews are performed using grading standards and criteria similar to those employed by bank regulatory agencies. Loans receiving lesser grades fall under the “classified” category, which includes all nonperforming and potential problem loans, and receive an elevated level of attention to ensure collection. Repossessed collateral is recorded at the lower of cost or market.

While we believe we use the best information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, net income could be significantly affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in determining the allowance or unforeseen market conditions arise that cause adjustments to the allowance for loan losses.

Page 14

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the changes in our allowance for loan losses:

While pursuing our growth strategy, we continue to employ prudent underwriting and sound monitoring procedures to maintain asset quality. The allowance for loan losses during the three months ended March 31, 2005 decreased by $424,000 to $7.9 million from $8.3 million at December 31, 2004. The decline in the allowance was due primarily to one charge off totaling $500,000, which management believes to be an isolated incident and was previously reserved for. Based on management’s assessment of loan quality, the Company believes that its reserve for loan losses is at an appropriate level under current economic conditions.

Liquidity and Sources of Funds

Our primary sources of funds are customer and local government deposits, loan repayments, loan sales, interest earned on and proceeds from investment securities, and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Seattle. These funds, together with retained earnings, equity, and other borrowed funds, are used to make loans, acquire investment securities and other assets, and fund continuing operations. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by the level of interest rates, economic conditions, and competition.

We must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to fund loan originations and deposit withdrawals, satisfy other financial commitments, and fund operations. We generally maintain sufficient cash and short-term investments to meet short-term liquidity needs. At March 31, 2005, cash and cash equivalents totaled $20.9 million, and investment securities classified as either available for sale or held to maturity with maturities of one

Page 15

Table of Contents

year or less amounted to $13.6 million, or 1.9% of total assets. At March 31, 2005, our banks maintained a credit facility with the FHLB of Seattle for $128.7 million, with $25.4 million in FHLB borrowings as of March 31, 2005.

Capital

Stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2005 was $62.3 million compared with $60.9 million at December 31, 2004. During the period, we repurchased $225,000 of Heritage Financial Corporation stock, declared dividends of $1.0 million, realized income of $2.6 million, recorded $346,000 in unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax, and realized the effects of exercising stock options, earned ESOP and restricted stock shares totaling $428,000.

Banking regulations require bank holding companies and banks to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of core capital to adjusted quarterly average total assets of at least 3%. At March 31, 2005 our leverage ratio was 8.1% compared with 8.0% at December 31, 2004. In addition, banking regulators have adopted risk-based capital guidelines, under which risk percentages are assigned to various categories of assets and off-balance sheet items to calculate a risk-adjusted capital ratio. Tier I capital generally consists of common shareholders’ equity, while Tier II capital includes the allowance for loan losses, subject to certain limitations. Regulatory minimum risk-based capital guidelines require Tier I capital of 4% of risk-adjusted assets and total capital (combined Tier I and Tier II) of 8%. Our Tier I and total risk based capital ratios were 9.8% and 11.1%, respectively, at March 31, 2005 compared with 9.6% and 10.8%, respectively, at December 31, 2004.

During 1992, the FDIC published the qualifications necessary to be classified as a “well-capitalized” bank, primarily for assignment of FDIC insurance premium rates beginning in 1993. To qualify as “well-capitalized”, banks must have a Tier I risk based capital ratio of at least 6%, a total risk based capital ratio of at least 10%, and a leverage ratio of at least 5%. Heritage Bank and Central Valley Bank qualified as “well-capitalized” at March 31, 2005.

Our results of operations are highly dependent upon our ability to manage interest rate risk. We consider interest rate risk to be a significant market risk that could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In our opinion, there has not been a material change in our interest rate risk exposure since our most recent year-end at December 31, 2004.

We do not maintain a trading account for any class of financial instrument nor do we engage in hedging activities or purchase high-risk derivative instruments. Moreover, we have no material risk with foreign currency exchange rate risk or commodity price risk.

Page 16

Table of Contents

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based upon their evaluation of those controls and procedures, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial officers of the Company concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate as of March 31, 2005.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. We made no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s quarter ended March 31, 2005, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Page 17

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

None

The Company has had various stock repurchase programs since March 1999. In August 2004, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase plan, allowing the Company to repurchase up to 5% of the then outstanding shares, or approximately 295,000 shares over a period of eighteen months. This marked the Company’s eighth stock repurchase plan. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company repurchased 10,349 shares at an average price of $21.72. In total, the Company has repurchased 20,049 shares at an average price of $21.31 under this plan.

The following table sets forth information about the Company’s purchases of its outstanding common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

None

None

None

Page 18

Table of Contents

Page 19

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Page 20