Back to GetFilings.com

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005

Commission File Number 333-88212

COLLINS & AIKMAN FLOORCOVERINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (706) 259-9711

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None*

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of April 15, 2005, 1,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, no par value, were outstanding and held entirely by Tandus Group, Inc. None of the Registrant’s common stock was held by non-affiliates.

Documents incorporated by reference: None.

PART I

All references in this Form 10-K to “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company” refer to Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. and subsidiaries.

Forward-Looking Statements

The Company has made in this Form 10-K and from time to time may make written and oral forward-looking statements. Written forward-looking statements may appear in documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in press releases and in reports to shareholders. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. The Company relies on this safe harbor in making such disclosures. All statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as to future expectations and financial results including, but not limited to, statements containing the words “plans,” “believes,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “projects,” “should,” “will” and similar expressions, should be considered forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor. The forward-looking statements are based on management’s current beliefs and assumptions about expectations, estimates, strategies and projections for the Company. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes or results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of future information, future events or otherwise. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions regarding forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, product demand and market acceptance risks; product development risks, such as delays or difficulties in developing, producing and marketing new products; the impact of competitive products, pricing and advertising; constraints resulting from the financial condition of the Company, including the degree to which the Company is leveraged; cycles in the construction and renovation of commercial and institutional buildings; failure to retain senior executives and other qualified personnel; unanticipated termination or interruption of the Company’s arrangement with its primary third-party supplier of nylon yarn; debt service requirements and restrictions under credit agreements and indentures; general economic conditions in the United States and in markets outside of the United States served by the Company; government regulations; risks of loss of material customers; environmental matters; and other risks described in the Company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

General

Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation formed in 1995, is principally a manufacturer of floorcovering products for the North American specified commercial carpet market. The Company’s floorcovering products include (i) vinyl-backed six-foot roll carpet and modular carpet tile and (ii) high-style tufted and woven broadloom carpets. The Company designs, manufactures and markets its C&A, Monterey and Crossley brands under the Tandus name for a wide variety of end markets, including education, corporate offices, healthcare, government facilities and retail stores. The ability to provide a “package of product offerings” in various forms, coupled with flexible distribution channels, allows the Company to provide a wide array of floorcovering solutions. The Company is headquartered in Georgia, with additional locations in California, Canada, the United Kingdom, Singapore and China.

The Company’s C&A brand products, six-foot roll carpet and modular carpet tile, are known for their long-term performance, comfort under foot, installation ease, longer useful life and advanced backing technology, which includes our RS “peel & stick” adhesive system for vinyl-backed product installation, and our ER3 carpet recycling technology.

2

The Company’s Monterey brand is known in the high-style, fashion-oriented sector of the commercial broadloom carpet market due to its designs and intricate patterns in a wide variety of colors, textures, pile heights and densities. The brand has been acknowledged on numerous occasions with various awards for its design.

The Company’s Crossley brand is known in Canada in the tufted and woven broadloom commercial carpet markets. The Crossley brand uses crossweave looms and state of the art tufting technology to produce high-quality woven and tufted products in a wide variety of patterns and price points to meet the needs of interior design professionals, flooring contractors and end users.

The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tandus Group, Inc. (“Tandus Group”). Subsequent to a recapitalization transaction on January 25, 2001, investment funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management, LLC (“Oaktree”) and Banc of America Capital Investors (“BACI”) control a majority of the outstanding capital stock of Tandus Group.

On August 10, 2004, the Company and its parent announced plans to consolidate its broadloom operations by moving the production of its Monterey brand to the Crossley manufacturing facility in Truro, Nova Scotia and closing its manufacturing facility in Santa Ana, California (the “Facility Maximization”). The Facility Maximization was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on August 9, 2004, and is currently expected to be completed by the end of the Company’s second fiscal quarter in 2005. The Facility Maximization is anticipated to substantially increase utilization in the Truro, Nova Scotia facility, create lower costs by better managing fixed assets, increase plant efficiencies and lower working capital requirements previously needed to support the two separate facilities. No assurances can be given that we will be successful in this regard.

The U.S. commercial carpet market, is comprised of the specified and non-specified segments. We focus on the specified commercial carpet market, which makes up the majority of the total U.S. commercial carpet market. In the specified commercial carpet market, products are manufactured to the specifications of architects, designers and owners, as compared to the non-specified market in which products are purchased off-the-shelf. The key competitive factors in the specified carpet market are product durability, long-term performance, product design and service, and price. We believe the Company is well-positioned to capitalize on recently emerging positive trends within the specified commercial carpet market, including (1) six-foot roll carpet continuing to gain market share from other floorcoverings in end markets in which it has distinct performance advantages, such as ease of maintenance, long-term performance and longer useful life; (2) modular carpet tile increasingly being used instead of other flooring surfaces due to increased raised flooring applications, the continuing trend toward modular furniture systems, and greater use of modular tile as a design tool and acceptance of tile in new markets; and (3) increasing customer demand for high-style broadloom carpet with complex patterns and textures.

Products

Tandus designs, manufactures and markets a comprehensive package of complementary products under the C&A, Monterey and Crossley brands, including six-foot roll carpet, modular carpet tile and woven and tufted broadloom carpet. In woven broadloom carpet, yarn is woven together to form a single integrated fabric and is distinguishable from tufted broadloom in which yarn is sewn into a primary backing with the later addition of a secondary backing. With a portfolio of products available in a wide variety of colors, textures, pile heights, densities and price points, we market ourselves as a one-stop solution for specified commercial carpet. We believe that each of our products offers distinctive characteristics for use and application. We believe that our ability to offer a complete package of product offerings is a competitive advantage since each product provides distinct features and benefits as follows:

Six-Foot Roll Carpet. We believe that our C&A brand holds a dominant market position in vinyl-backed, six-foot roll carpet. Six-foot roll carpet has certain performance advantages versus twelve-foot broadloom carpet and hard surface flooring and is used primarily in applications that require (i) long-term appearance retention, (ii) ease of maintenance and (iii) comfort under foot. Our six-foot roll carpet utilizes the Powerbond backing technology and the patented RS “peel and stick” installation system.

3

Modular Carpet Tile. We believe C&A was the first manufacturer in North America to introduce vinyl-backed modular carpet tile technology and is among the leading brands within the domestic modular carpet tile market. Our modular carpet tile products are offered in a variety of sizes to accommodate a range of domestic and international requirements. Our C&A brand carpet tile is being made with ER3, our patented recycled content backing, the only one of its kind in the industry. See “Product Features—ER3”

Broadloom Carpet. The Monterey and Crossley brands are known design leaders in the high-style, fashion-oriented sector of the commercial broadloom carpet market. Sold in twelve-foot rolls, Monterey broadloom is tufted, while Crossley provides both tufted and woven broadloom. Broadloom is particularly suited for fashionable designs and stylish interiors as its width provides a broad area upon which creative designs and intricate patterns can be displayed in a wide variety of colors, textures, pile heights and densities. Specified broadloom carpet is primarily used in end markets where aesthetics and style are the drivers rather than durability or long-term appearance retention. In general, broadloom carpet is more frequently replaced than six-foot roll goods or carpet tile because of its prevalence in spaces, which are regularly renovated in order to reflect current fashion trends and styles.

Product Features

Powerbond. In 1967, our C&A brand introduced Powerbond, the industry’s first vinyl cushioned backing system. This closed-cell backing technology exhibits superior durability and cleaning characteristics and reduced seam visibility. Powerbond combines the best attributes of hard surfaces (longer useful life and ease of maintenance) and carpet floorcoverings (comfort, acoustics and aesthetics). It eliminates problems often associated with traditional broadloom carpet, including delamination (separation of carpet backing), zippering and unraveling. In addition, these products are installed using chemically-welded seams rather than conventional glued seams to provide a seamless, impermeable moisture barrier. Other Powerbond features include its ease of repair, long-term appearance, a 50% to 100% longer useful life than conventional broadloom carpet and 15 to 25 year non-prorated warranty against delamination, loss of cushion resiliency and watermarking.

RS. In 1988, we introduced our RS technology, a patented releasable “peel & stick” adhesive system for Powerbond vinyl-backed product installation, which dramatically simplifies installation. The RS technology enables products to be bonded to a surface without the use of wet adhesives thus minimizing disruption to customers during the installation process. Conventional installations with wet adhesives normally require significant downtime for the adhesive to cure prior to installation. The RS technology also addresses carpet-related indoor air quality concerns by eliminating the fumes typically associated with wet adhesives. The RS technology minimizes disruption to usable space, which is often critical in each of our end markets.

ER3. ER3 is a patented backing for modular carpet tile produced from both post-consumer and post-industrial carpet waste. This closed-loop system (waste-to-product) allows us to take used carpet tile from our customers and use it as raw material for producing new carpet tile. This system eliminates our customers’ disposal costs and can keep waste out of landfills at a time when environmental sensitivities are high.

Crossley Weaving Heritage. Weaving continues to be an important differentiation for us in high-end markets. Woven fabrics are unique in construction and are believed to be valued by professional designers as a result of their more refined styling capability and pattern flexibility. Woven carpets are a single, integrated fabric that offer strength, stability and locked-in-yarns to prevent zippering or pulling. Today, we are one of only a few manufacturers in North America with weaving capability.

4

End Markets

Corporate. We offer a complete package of carpet product offerings that addresses most needs of the corporate facility manager and their interior designers and architects, including six-foot roll carpet, modular carpet tile and tufted and woven broadloom carpet. We have a dedicated sales force that focuses exclusively on marketing our brands to the corporate market. This group works with the individual brands to develop flooring solutions for corporate facility managers. We have focused on projects on the basis of product durability, appearance retention, production design and service rather than pricing. As part of our strategy to increase penetration of this market, we have a national accounts program that targets the country’s largest corporations. This group focuses on Fortune 1000 corporations by developing relationships at the senior levels in facility management and purchasing.

Education. The education market has been a primary focus for the C&A brand since the development of Powerbond in 1967. Powerbond’s long-term appearance retention characteristics have been the principal factor behind its success in this market, as customers tend to be particularly sensitive to longer useful life, comfort, acoustics and ease of maintenance. The Powerbond product in many of these installations has been in use for more than 20 years. Historically, we have focused on the kindergarten through 12^th grade market, however, over the last few years, we have expanded our marketing efforts to include the college and university markets. We expect to utilize our other product offerings to grow this segment, as colleges and universities have more diverse floorcovering needs than the primary and secondary school markets.

HealthCare. We believe that Powerbond RS is particularly well suited to the healthcare market because of its moisture impermeability and quick, safe installation. Powerbond RS, which is installed without wet adhesives, facilitates use immediately following installation, a critical concern within the healthcare market, and its moisture impermeability and welded seams make it easy to maintain. Long term care is the fastest growing segment within the healthcare market due to compelling demographics. These facilities strive to create a home-like environment for residents, which provides an opportunity for us to promote all products including the Irish-Style broadloom brands.

Government. We market and sell to federal, state and local governments. We are suppliers to the U.S. General Services Administration, which establishes product categories and related minimum product specifications for various budget levels and aesthetic requirements. State and local governments purchase floorcovering products independently through contracts with approved suppliers. We are currently an approved supplier to several states and municipalities. We believe that we are better able to compete in the government market based on our environmental initiatives, including both the Powerbond RS “peel & stick” backing system and our ER3 recycled content product offerings.

Retail Stores. We focus on major retail chains that have the potential for large, nationwide volumes. This segment requires a diverse product offering, as needs vary from high-end boutiques to mass merchandisers. We believe that our products are well suited to fulfill these needs and provide the added advantage of reducing potential “slip and fall” liability. A significant portion of these sales is managed by our Source One department, which arranges product installation for our customers. Our installation service and our comprehensive project management capabilities are critical to meet short construction schedules inherent in the retail market.

5

International Markets. In July 1999, we acquired Crossley Carpet Mills, Ltd (“Crossley”) of Truro, Nova Scotia. This acquisition allowed the Company to market all three of our brands in Canada through the Crossley organization. In addition, in August 1998, we acquired a 51.0% interest in Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings Asia Pte. Ltd., a start-up commercial carpet distribution venture in Singapore. We established our first international sales office in 1989 in the United Kingdom, and in 1998 acquired a carpet-backing manufacturer headquartered in Wales. Our presence in such international markets enables us to distribute our products throughout the world and strengthen our relationships with U.S.-based multi-national corporate accounts. We plan to continue to add distributors and dedicated sales personnel in strategic international geographies to increase our share of the global commercial carpet market. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we expect to begin production of carpet tile products in Suzhou, China. We plan to sell the products manufactured at this facility into mainland China and throughout Southeast Asia, although no assurance can be given that we will be successful in this regard. In addition, the Company recently formed Tandus Netherlands BV, which will serve as our sales headquarters for continental Europe.

Sales and Segmentation Strategy

We utilize a segmented sales and marketing strategy to target the specific needs of the customers in each of our end markets. This segmented marketing strategy requires each sales person to develop an expertise in a specific end market, which is expected to result in greater customer-focused service, comprehensive market coverage and increased sales productivity.

Our C&A, Monterey and Crossley brands provide custom designed products and promotional materials for each end market, which highlight the advantages of our products in several key performance categories. Each end market is sensitive to different issues and places value on different performance characteristics. We have developed our products and technical innovations in response to the needs of our target customers and segments. Although we will work with a distributor in order to arrange for delivery and sale, our primary contact with the customer is through our sales force and not through an intermediary. This enables us to continue to customize our products and services to respond to the specific needs of the customer. We have an in-house design team for each brand that is dedicated to developing new, innovative designs for each of our primary end markets.

Across our brands, the majority of sales are specified by the facility owner or a professional designer. Because each market has distinct performance, design and installation requirements, our account managers focus on educating the facility owners and design professionals on (i) the technical specifications and advantages of our products, (ii) our design capabilities for specific market segments, (iii) our environmental initiatives and (iv) our value-added services. We believe this end market-oriented strategy has resulted in greater visibility for our brands.

Distribution

We sell and distribute our products through three primary channels: direct to the end customer, Source One and dealers. Although a majority of our invoicing is through floorcovering dealers, our primary marketing efforts are focused on the end customer and professional designers and architects who create specifications for our products. By focusing on the needs of the end customer, our distribution strategy enables the sales and marketing personnel to establish multiple relationships within specific segments and regions. We operate with this flexible distribution philosophy to meet the needs of the customer rather than mandating from whom our customers can buy our products. Our distribution channels are outlined below.

Direct. Direct distribution allows customers to purchase our floorcovering products directly from us. Our account managers work directly with the customer to advise, educate and make recommendations for the selection and specification of the right product for the particular application. The customer is responsible for sub-contracting the project management and installation.

6

Source One. Source One, our in-house project management department, provides single-source coordination and turnkey project management service. The department was established to provide a “one phone call,” “single-source” project management service to meet the specific needs of our customer base. The service includes facility measurement, project coordination, order entry, delivery and installation of a wide range of interior finishes from our product offerings. A network of over 1,000 certified installers and strategic dealer partnerships throughout the United States provides installation.

Dealers. The carpet industry often sells products to customers through the use of local dealers, who typically broker products from manufacturers and subcontract installation through local installers. Many customers request that the product be delivered through a local dealer who provides a range of project management services, including carpet removal, staging and installation services.

Backlog

Our backlog of unshipped orders was approximately $23.7 million at January 29, 2005. Historically, backlog is subject to significant fluctuations due to the timing of orders for individual large projects.

Product Development and Design

Product development and design is important in the commercial floorcovering marketplace as designers and customers seek up-to-date product aesthetics. We generally develop products tailored to the requirements of specific market segments. This process begins with feedback from leading designers and customers in each segment relating to product features such as color, texture and pattern. This marketplace input is vital as the product/styling needs are very different for each end market. Our product development group is highly integrated with our sales organization and customer base, which increases the effectiveness of the product development process.

We estimate that approximately one fourth of our sales involve custom colors or designs requiring accurate interpretation of customer needs and timely conversion into a sample fabric. Each manufacturing facility has dedicated sample equipment that facilitates quick turnaround of custom design requests.

Competition

The commercial floorcovering industry is highly competitive. Our C&A brand competes with other brands of vinyl-backed carpet, as well as twelve-foot broadloom carpet and other types of commercial floorcovering. The major competitors to the C&A brand are Interface, Inc., Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Shaw Industries, Inc. in six-foot roll goods, and Interface Flooring System, Inc. (owned by Interface, Inc.), Milliken Inc., Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Shaw Industries, Inc. in modular carpet tile products. Our Monterey and Crossley brands compete with other broadloom manufacturers. The major competitors to the Monterey and Crossley brands are Bentley Mills (owned by Interface, Inc.), Mohawk Industries, Atlas Carpets, Masland Carpets and Shaw Industries. Although the industry recently has experienced consolidation, a large number of manufacturers remain. In North America, we believe we are the largest manufacturer of six-foot roll carpet, a leading manufacturer of modular carpet tile and a design leader in the high-style specified commercial broadloom carpet market. There are a number of domestic competitors that manufacture these products and certain of these competitors have greater financial resources than we do.

We believe the key competitive factors in our primary floorcovering markets are product durability, product design and color, appearance retention, service and price. In the specified commercial market, six-foot roll carpet and modular carpet tiles compete with various floorcoverings, of which broadloom carpet has the largest market share. Our six-foot roll carpet has gained market share from traditional broadloom carpet in end markets in which it has distinct performance advantages, such as ease of maintenance,

7

appearance retention and longer useful life. Modular carpet tile has also increasingly been used instead of other flooring surfaces due to raised flooring applications, which enable under-the-floor cable management and air delivery systems, and the continuing trend toward modular furniture systems, which require the functionality of tile. Ease of maintenance (replacement) and flexibility of design are also emerging trends for tile. In the high-style specified commercial broadloom carpet market, the Monterey and Crossley brands primarily compete on aesthetics, service, quality and price.

Manufacturing and Facilities

We own four manufacturing facilities in Dalton, Georgia including (i) a yarn processing plant with carpet dyeing capabilities, (ii) a carpet tufting plant, (iii) a carpet finishing and tile cutting plant, which includes tile printing and recycling operations and (iv) a customer service center and distribution warehouse. Extrusion owns a yarn extrusion facility in Calhoun, Georgia. Crossley owns a manufacturing, administrative and warehouse facility in Truro, Nova Scotia. Tandus Manufacturing Limited owns two facilities in the United Kingdom, including a six-foot roll and tile finishing plant. Monterey, until completion of the facility maximization project, leases a carpet tufting, administrative and warehouse facility in Santa Ana, California. In addition to these facilities, we lease a number of sales and service facilities and one warehouse in the United States and one sales and service facility in the United Kingdom. We believe our manufacturing capacity is sufficient to meet our requirements for the foreseeable future. During the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we plan to begin production of carpet tile products in Suzhou, China. We plan to sell the products manufactured at this facility into mainland China and throughout Southeast Asia. No assurance can be given in this regard.

On August 10, 2004, the Company and its parent announced its intent to close its manufacturing facility in Santa Ana, California, and transfer the production to its existing Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada, facility. The Facility Maximization was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on August 9, 2004, and is expected to be completed by the end of the Company’s second fiscal quarter in 2005.

8

The following table summarizes our manufacturing, distribution and sales facilities:

9

Raw Materials

Our raw materials, including yarn, nylon and polypropylene chip, primary backing, coater materials, and dye chemicals, represent the single largest component of our carpet’s costs. Yarn comprises approximately one-third of the carpet’s cost structure and in excess of one-half of total raw material costs. Historically, we have been able to pass on yarn price increases in the ordinary course of business in response to published increases by major yarn suppliers. Increases in the cost of petroleum-based raw materials could adversely affect us if we were unable to pass the increase through to our customers. Unanticipated termination or interruption of our arrangement with our primary third-party supplier of nylon yarn, Invista, Inc. (“Invista”), could have a material adverse effect on us. We use Invista continuous filament yarn for the majority of our products.

While Invista is a very important vendor, we believe that there are adequate alternative sources of supply from which we could fulfill our synthetic fiber requirement including, but not limited to, nylon yarn produced by the Company’s extrusion facility. In addition to Invista, there are at least three major third party suppliers to the commercial carpet industry from whom the Company acquires yarn.

The other significant raw materials used by the Company in its carpet manufacturing process include coater materials, such as vinyl resins and primary backing. The Company has not experienced a problem sourcing nylon, processed yarn or any other raw material used in the manufacture of carpet from suppliers and does not anticipate any difficulties in sourcing these raw materials in the future, although no assurances can be given in this regard.

At the Company’s yarn extrusion plant, the significant raw materials used are nylon and polypropylene polymer and dye pigments. The chips purchased are used to manufacture the nylon and polypropylene yarn. The dye and pigments give the yarn color for solution dyed yarns.

Patents, Copyrights and Trademarks

We own numerous copyrights and patents in the United States and certain other countries, including our Powerbond RS patent, which expires in 2008, and our patents (process and product) for the ER3 backing produced from our environmental programs, which expire in 2014. We also own numerous registered trademarks in the United States, including Powerbond and Powerbond RS. We consider our industry knowledge and technology more important to our current business than our patents, copyrights or trademarks and, accordingly, believe the expiration of existing patents or loss of a copyright or trademark will not have a material adverse effect on our operations. However, we actively maintain and enforce patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets.

Seasonality

The Company experiences seasonal fluctuations, with generally lower sales and gross profit in the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year and higher sales and gross profit in the second and third quarters of the fiscal year. The seasonality of sales and profitability is primarily a result of disproportionately higher education end market sales during the summer months while schools generally are closed and floorcovering can be installed.

10

Customers

No single customer amounted to or exceeded 10.0% of the Floorcovering segment’s sales for any period presented in the accompanying financial statements. The Extrusion segment’s largest customer accounted for 35.4% of sales during fiscal 2004, as a result of a three-year supply agreement with the seller from whom the extrusion facility was acquired. The Extrusion segment’s second largest customer accounted for 14.0% of sales during fiscal 2004.

International Sales

International net sales of the Company were $39.3 million or 12.6% and $41.3 million or 12.1% of the Company’s total net sales for fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004, respectively. Canadian customers comprised $28.8 million or 9.3% and $31.0 or 9.1% of total net sales for fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004, respectively, while the remaining international sales, primarily to customers in Southeast Asia, the U.K. and South America, were $10.5 million or 3.4% in fiscal 2003 and $10.3 million or 3.0% in fiscal 2004.

Employees

At January 29, 2005, we had a total of 1,715 employees of which 1,104 were hourly and 611 salaried. We have experienced no work stoppages and believe that our employee relations are good. All of our employees are non-union with the exception of Crossley’s approximately 350 manufacturing workers in Canada that are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. The collective bargaining agreement that represents this union expires on June 30, 2006. Under a separate agreement the union and the Company have agreed that there will be no work stoppages through 2011.

Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of materials into the environment. The costs of complying with environmental protection laws and regulations have not had a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations in the past and are not expected to have a material adverse impact in the future. The environmental management systems of our floorcovering manufacturing facilities are certified under ISO 14001.

Financial Information About Operating Segments and Geographic Areas

The Company operates in two industry segments: floorcoverings and extrusion. Information relating to the Company’s two operating segments can be found in Note 13 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 29, 2005. Certain information concerning our net sales and long-lived assets by geographic areas can also be found in Note 13.

11

Available Information

The Company files periodic reports (Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549. You may also obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The Company’s Internet address is www.tandus.com.

Reports to Security Holders

The Company provides its stockholder with unaudited interim and annual financial information that has been examined and reported on with an opinion expressed by the Company’s independent auditor.

For information concerning the principal physical properties of the Company, see “Item 1. Business – Manufacturing and Facilities.”

In 1996 and 1997, the Company sold approximately $0.6 million of carpet tile product to Employers Mutual Insurance Companies (“EMC”). EMC subsequently filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa on August 6, 2002 alleging the carpet experienced premature wearing and discoloration, and asserted that the Company should pay damages based upon theories of violation of warranties, negligence and fraud. The Company examined EMC’s claim prior to commencement of the action and determined that EMC had not properly maintained the carpet, resulting in irreversible damage to the carpet. The Company filed a motion for summary judgment and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa ruled in favor of the Company on the negligence, written warranty claims and implied warranty of merchantability. Other claims included express oral warranty, implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose, fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent nondisclosure and were tried to a jury. On March 18, 2004, the jury entered a verdict in favor of the Company on the fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent nondisclosure claims and in favor of EMC on the express oral warranty and implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose. The jury awarded EMC $0.8 million in damages for full replacement of this carpet. The Company filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law and a motion for a new trial. The judge denied the Company’s motion for judgment as a matter of law but conditionally granted the Company’s motion for a new trial if EMC refused to accept a $0.2 million reduction of the judgment. EMC agreed to the reduction of the judgment, causing the new trial motion to be denied. The Company has appealed the denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law asserting that EMC failed to prove the affirmative defense of fraudulent concealment by clear, convincing and satisfactory evidence. The Company has posted a letter of credit in favor of EMC for $0.8 million to secure EMC’s recovery should EMC prevail. If the Company is unsuccessful, it will be required to pay the judgment amount and related legal and professional fees.

The Company believes substantial errors were committed in the trial, including the failure of the trial court to render judgment as a matter of law that the Company did not owe EMC a fiduciary duty, and in the erroneous application by the jury of its instructions on the measure of damages. The judgment award of $0.6 million was recorded during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, and is included as an accrued liability in the January 29, 2005 consolidated balance sheet. The Company incurred legal expenses during fiscal 2004 related to the EMC lawsuit of approximately $0.6 million. The expenses are included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2004.

12

Monterey Carpets, Inc., (“Monterey”) in connection with its previous 50% ownership interest in Chroma Systems Partners (“Chroma”), is a co-defendant in an alleged claim by Enron Energy Services, Inc. (“Enron”) that Chroma and its partners are liable for amounts related to certain energy contracts that existed between Chroma and Enron prior to the filing of Enron’s Chapter 11 proceedings. Settlement negotiations are on going and it is not possible to estimate the extent of any possible loss at this time. Monterey has filed its response and intends to vigorously contest Enron’s lawsuit. A mandatory mediation session is currently scheduled for June 2, 2005. During fiscal 2004, Monterey terminated its partnership interest in Chroma as part of the facility maximization project.

From time to time the Company is subject to claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business, including workers’ compensation and product liability claims, which may or may not be covered by insurance. Management believes that the various asserted claims and litigation in which the Company is currently involved will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

None.

13

PART II

As of April 15, 2005, there was one holder of record of the Company’s common stock. There is no public trading market for the Company’s common stock.

The following table provides information as of January 29, 2005, with respect to compensation plans under which Tandus Group equity securities are authorized for issuance.

Dividends

The declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and depends upon, among other things, our investment policy and opportunities, results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects, and other factors that may be considered relevant by our Board at the time of its determination. Such other factors include certain limitations in covenants contained in our senior credit facility and in the indentures governing our public indebtedness. The Company paid dividends of approximately $2.3 million to its parent, Tandus Group, Inc., in fiscal 2003 and paid no dividends in fiscal 2004. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

14

The following data is qualified in its entirety by the consolidated financial statements of the Company and other information contained elsewhere herein. The financial data as of and for the years ended January 27, 2001, January 26, 2002, January 25, 2003, January 31, 2004 and January 29, 2005 have been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company. The following financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.

15

16

GENERAL

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with and is qualified in its entirety by reference to our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Except for historical information, the discussions in this section contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Future results could differ materially from those discussed below as a result of a number of factors.

Overview

Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is a manufacturer of floorcovering products for the North American specified commercial carpet market. The Company’s floorcovering products include (i) vinyl-backed six-foot roll carpet and modular carpet tile, and (ii) high-style tufted and woven broadloom carpet. The Company designs, manufactures and markets its C&A, Monterey and Crossley brands under the Tandus name for a wide variety of end markets, including education, corporate office, healthcare, government facilities and retail stores. The ability to provide a “package of product offerings” coupled with flexible distribution channels, allows the Company to provide a wide array of floorcovering solutions. The Company is headquartered in Georgia, with additional locations in California, Canada, the United Kingdom, Singapore and China.

The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tandus Group, Inc. (“Tandus Group”). As a result of a recapitalization transaction on January 25, 2001, investment funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management, LLC (“Oaktree”) and Banc of America Capital Investors (“BACI”) control a majority of the outstanding capital stock of Tandus Group.

Acquisitions

On May 8, 2002, CAF Extrusion, Inc. (“Extrusion”), a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired a yarn extrusion manufacturing plant located in Calhoun, Georgia. In addition, Extrusion purchased the real property on which the plant is located from a third party. The acquisition was funded from cash on hand. The cash purchase price was $34.8 million plus $0.3 million for acquisition related expenses and consisted of $2.4 million for the land and building, $1.4 million for inventory, $17.7 million for machinery and equipment, $5.6 million for goodwill (which was assigned an indefinite life), and $8.0 million for a supply agreement which is being amortized over its term of three years. The acquisition has been accounted for by the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of operations of Extrusion have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from May 8, 2002.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain operating results as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated. Fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2002 were 52 weeks while fiscal 2003 contained 53 weeks.

17

Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005 (“fiscal 2004”)

Compared with Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2004 (“fiscal 2003”)

Net Sales. Net sales for fiscal 2004 were $340.5 million, an increase of $29.4 million or 9.5%, from $311.1 million in fiscal 2003. Net sales of the Company’s floorcovering segment were $317.2 million for fiscal 2004 as compared to $283.0 million for fiscal 2003, an increase of $34.2 million or 12.1%. The increase in the floorcovering segment’s net sales was due to improved demand throughout the specified commercial market in North America. Increases were achieved in all end markets with the corporate, government and education markets having the largest year over year increases. The increase was primarily volume driven. Net sales of the Extrusion segment were $23.3 million for fiscal 2004 as compared to $28.0 million for 2003, a decrease of $4.8 million or 17.1%. The lower external net sales for the Extrusion segment was due to significantly increased usage by the Company’s floorcovering segment and lower sales to the former owner than in the prior year. The reduction was partially offset by increased sales to new external customers.

Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold increased to $226.6 million in fiscal 2004 from $209.8 million, an increase of $16.8 million or 8.0%. The decrease as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to the increased absorption of fixed manufacturing costs as a result of improved sales volume, increased usage of the yarn from the Company’s Extrusion facility and manufacturing cost improvements. As a percentage of sales, these costs were 66.6% for fiscal 2004 and 67.4% for fiscal 2003. Included in cost of goods sold for the 2004 period are expenses of $2.6 million related to the Company’s planned closure and transfer of assets from its Santa Ana, California facility. (See further discussion in “Liquidity and Capital Resources”).

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The Company’s selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2004 were $78.2 million, an increase of $4.9 million or 6.6% from $73.4 million for fiscal 2003. However, as a percentage of sales, these expenses, were 23.0% for fiscal 2004 as compared to 23.6% for fiscal 2003. The increase in dollars was primarily due to higher compensation and related benefits of $5.7 million, foreign exchange losses of $2.0 million and commissions of $0.6 million, which were partially offset by lower legal and professional fees of $1.5 million, sampling and related costs of $1.1 million, and advertising, marketing and related costs of $1.5 million. Included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the 2004 period are expenses of $1.4 million related to the Company’s planned closure and transfer of assets from its Santa Ana, California facility. (See further discussion in “Liquidity and Capital Resources”).

Amortization. Intangible asset amortization decreased to $3.1 million in fiscal 2004 from $8.8 million in fiscal 2003. The decrease was due to the Company’s non-compete with its former parent being fully amortized as of January 31, 2004, the $2.6 million non-cash impairment charge of the extrusion supply agreement in fiscal 2003 and lower amortization of the extrusion supply agreement in fiscal 2004 due to the non-cash impairment charge during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.

18

Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense for fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003 was $20.5 million and $21.3 million, respectively, which included interest income of $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Fiscal 2003 includes a charge to interest expense of $0.4 million to reflect the write-off of a pro-rata share of deferred financing costs associated with the prepayment of term debt with cash generated by operations. There were no write-offs of deferred financing costs or unscheduled prepayments of debt in fiscal 2004.

Income Taxes. The Company had income tax expense of $6.0 million for fiscal 2004 versus an income tax benefit of $2.1 million for fiscal 2003. The Company’s effective tax rate for fiscal 2004 was 47.1% and was primarily due to 1) higher profitability of the Company and its subsidiaries in the United States, 2) combined net loss of its foreign subsidiaries against which no tax benefit can be recognized and, 3) the recognition of a $0.9 million valuation allowance against certain domestic state income tax credits carried forward from prior periods that may not be utilized in future periods. These credits were produced by the Company’s California subsidiary, and management believes it is more likely than not that their use may be limited after the closure of the Santa Ana, California facility. The tax benefit for fiscal 2003 was primarily due to the initial qualification for these credits, which included a component related to prior years, and was recorded during fiscal 2003.

Net Income. Net income for fiscal 2004 increased to $6.7 million from $1.2 million in fiscal 2003. This was due to the combined result of the factors described above.

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash charges or expenses (other than the write-down of current assets), non-recurring costs associated with an unsuccessful acquisition, expenses related to the facility maximization project, plus Chroma cash dividends and minority interest in income of subsidiary less equity in earnings of Chroma, plus a non-cash charge relating to the impairment of a supply agreement for the extrusion facility. Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2004 was $51.0 million compared to $42.7 million in fiscal 2003, an increase of $8.3 million or 19.5%. As a percentage of sales, Adjusted EBITDA improved to 15.0% in fiscal 2004 compared to 13.7% in fiscal 2003. Adjusted EBITDA is presented because it is commonly used by certain investors and analysts to analyze a company’s ability to service debt. The Company utilizes Adjusted EBITDA as (a) a benchmark for its annual budget and long range plan, (b) a valuation method for potential acquisitions, and (c) a measure to determine compliance with senior credit facility debt covenants. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered an alternative to operating income or net income as a measure of liquidity. Because Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated identically by all companies, the presentation in these statements may not be comparable to those disclosed by other companies.

A reconciliation from net income to Adjusted EBITDA is as follows:

19

Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2004 (“fiscal 2003”)

Compared with Fiscal Year Ended January 25, 2003 (“fiscal 2002”)

Net Sales. Net sales for fiscal 2003 were $311.1 million, a decrease of $10.1 million or 3.1% from $321.2 million in fiscal 2002. Net sales of the Company’s floorcovering segment were $283.0 million for fiscal 2003 as compared to $298.0 million for fiscal 2002, a decrease of $15.0 million or 5.0%. The decrease in the floorcovering segment’s net sales for fiscal 2003 was due to the continued slow demand throughout the specified commercial market in the United States. In particular, the demand in the corporate office market was slow during fiscal 2003 and 2002. This decrease was offset by the inclusion of the extrusion operation’s net sales for the full year ended January 31, 2004 as compared to a partial year in the prior year. The extrusion operation was acquired on May 8, 2002.

Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of good sold decreased to $209.8 million in fiscal 2003 from $211.0 million, a decrease of $1.2 million or 0.6%. This decrease resulted from lower net sales and cost reduction initiatives partially offset by the inclusion of the costs of the extrusion operation for the full fiscal year in 2003. As a percentage of sales, these costs were 67.4% for fiscal 2003 and 65.7% for fiscal 2002.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The Company’s selling, general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2003 increased to $73.4 million, an increase of $6.1 million or 9.1% from $67.2 million for fiscal 2002. As a percentage of sales, these expenses, were 23.6% for fiscal 2003 and 20.9% in fiscal 2002. The increase was primarily due to increased salaries and related benefits of $3.6 million, sampling and related costs of $2.0 million, legal and professional fees of $2.2 million, and marketing and promotional expenses of $1.6 million, which were partially offset by lower commissions of $1.3 million and foreign exchange gains of $2.0 million. A portion of the increased salaries and related benefits, sampling and related cost and marketing and promotional expenses were related to the Company’s new selling strategy, which was implemented beginning January 26, 2003, and to support a number of new floorcovering product lines introduced during the year. The legal and professional fee increase includes the costs of a lawsuit judgment of $0.8 million and $0.7 million of expenses related to this lawsuit and $1.0 million of non-recurring costs associated with an unsuccessful acquisition.

Amortization. Intangible asset amortization increased to $8.8 million in fiscal 2003 from $5.5 million in fiscal 2002. The increase in amortization was due to a full year of amortization of the Extrusion segment’s supply agreement. The Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $2.6 million in fiscal 2003 related to the impairment of the supply agreement.

Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense for fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 was $21.3 million and $23.9 million, respectively, which included interest income of $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Fiscal 2003 includes a charge to interest expense of $0.4 million to reflect the write-off of a pro-rata share of deferred financing costs associated with the prepayment of term debt with cash generated by operations. Fiscal 2002 includes a charge to interest expense of $2.7 million to reflect the write-off of a pro-rata share of deferred financing costs associated with the prepayment of term debt from proceeds of the 9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes offering and from cash generated by operations.

Income Taxes. The Company has an income tax benefit of $2.1 million for fiscal 2003 versus a tax provision of $6.8 million for fiscal 2002. The 2003 income tax benefit results from the Company’s loss before income taxes which is attributable to lower net sales and higher selling, general and administrative expenses as discussed above. The income tax benefit also results from the Company qualifying for certain state income tax credits not previously obtained. A portion of the credits is available for refund with the remainder to be carried forward. The Company has completed and filed amended returns for the prior years in which a refund is available. The receivable recorded in the Company’s financial statements is $0.4 million, and the deferred amount of credits is $0.9 million, both net of the effect of federal income taxes. The credits to be carried forward have no expiration date. The Company also reduced its reserve for certain tax contingency items by $0.9 million in fiscal 2003.

Net Income. Net income for fiscal 2003 decreased to $1.2 million from $5.8 million in fiscal 2002. This was due to the combined result of the factors described above.

20

Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization plus the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, Chroma cash dividends, gain on forgiveness of debt, minority interest in income of subsidiary, non-recurring costs associated with an unsuccessful acquisition less equity in earnings of Chroma, plus a non-cash charge relating to the impairment of a supply agreement for the extrusion facility. Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2003 decreased to $42.7 million from $53.8 million in fiscal 2002, a decrease of $11.1 million or 20.7%. As a percentage of sales, Adjusted EBITDA was 13.7% in fiscal 2003 compared to 16.8% in fiscal 2002. Adjusted EBITDA is presented because it is commonly used by certain investors and analysts to analyze a company’s ability to service debt. The Company utilizes Adjusted EBITDA as (a) a benchmark for its annual budget and long range plan, (b) a valuation method for potential acquisitions, and (c) a measure to determine compliance with senior credit facility debt covenants. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and should not be considered an alternative to operating income or net income as a measure of liquidity. Because Adjusted EBITDA is not calculated identically by all companies, the presentation in these statements may not be comparable to those disclosed by other companies.

A reconciliation from net income to Adjusted EBITDA is a follows:

21

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s principal uses of cash have historically been for operating expenses, working capital, capital expenditures and debt repayment. The Company has financed its cash requirements through internally generated cash flows, borrowings and the offering of the Senior Subordinated Notes.

Net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2004 was $27.2 million compared to net cash provided of $20.0 million in fiscal 2003. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to increased profitability of $5.5 million.

Net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2004 was $10.8 million compared to $5.3 million in fiscal 2003. The increase in cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2004 was primarily due to increased capital expenditures and lower cash distributions from Chroma. The fiscal 2003 distribution from Chroma included a special dividend of $1.7 million and there was no such special dividend in fiscal 2004. The fiscal 2004 distribution from Chroma was also lower due to the Company exiting the partnership during the third quarter of fiscal 2004 in conjunction with the Company’s facility maximization project. The Company anticipates capital expenditures for fiscal 2005 to be approximately $13.0 to $14.0 million.

Net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2004 was $1.5 million compared to net cash used of $24.3 million in fiscal 2003. The decrease in cash used by financing activities was due primarily to lower prepayments of the Senior Credit Facility in fiscal 2004 and reduced dividends to the Company’s parent.

The Company has significant indebtedness which consists of $175.0 million of 9.75% senior subordinated notes due 2010; $30.9 million in senior term debt; $1.1 million in purchase money and other indebtedness; and $1.2 million in sinking fund bond obligations owed to the Nova Scotia Business Development Corporation (the “NSBDC Bonds”) issued by Crossley. As of January 29, 2005, the Company’s $50.0 million revolving line of credit had no borrowings outstanding and $3.0 million of letters of credit outstanding leaving total availability of $47.0 million. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants as of January 29, 2005.

The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, or to refinance its indebtedness, depends on its future performance, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, and other factors beyond its control. However, there can be no assurance that the Company’s business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available in an amount sufficient to enable the Company to service its indebtedness or to make necessary capital expenditures. The Company periodically evaluates potential acquisitions of businesses, which complement existing operations. Depending on various factors, including, among others, the cash consideration required in such potential acquisitions, the Company may determine to finance any such transaction with existing sources of liquidity.

The Company’s semi-annual interest payments of the 9.75% Notes are due on each February 15 and August 15 through February 15, 2010. The amount due on each date is $8.5 million.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company leased a facility to be used for a carpet tile production facility in Suzhou, China. Products manufactured at this facility will be sold into mainland China and throughout Southeast Asia. Funding of $3.0 million was provided during fiscal 2003 with an additional $2.0 million provided during fiscal 2004. Additional funding of up to $1.0 million may be required during fiscal 2005. The Company expects production to begin at this facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2005, although no assurance can be given in this regard.

22

In 1996 and 1997, the Company sold approximately $0.6 million of carpet tile product to Employers Mutual Insurance Companies (“EMC”). EMC subsequently filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa on August 6, 2002 alleging the carpet experienced premature wearing and discoloration, and asserted that the Company should pay damages based upon theories of violation of warranties, negligence and fraud. The Company examined EMC’s claim prior to commencement of the action and determined that EMC had not properly maintained the carpet, resulting in irreversible damage to the carpet. The Company filed a motion for summary judgment and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa ruled in favor of the Company on the negligence, written warranty claims and implied warranty of merchantability. Other claims included express oral warranty, implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose, fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent nondisclosure were tried to a jury. On March 18, 2004, the jury entered a verdict in favor of the Company on the fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent nondisclosure claims and in favor of EMC on the express oral warranty and implied warranty of fitness for particular purpose. The jury awarded EMC $0.8 million in damages for full replacement of this carpet. The Company filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law and a motion for a new trial. The judge denied the Company’s motion for judgment as a matter of law but conditionally granted the Company’s motion for a new trial if EMC refused to accept a reduction of the judgment by $0.2 million. EMC agreed to the reduction of the judgment, causing the new trial motion to be denied. The Company has appealed the denial of its motion for judgment as a matter of law asserting that EMC failed to prove the affirmative defense of fraudulent concealment by clear, convincing and satisfactory evidence. The Company has posted a letter of credit in favor of EMC for $0.8 million to secure EMC’s recovery should EMC prevail. If the Company is unsuccessful, it will be required to pay the judgment amount and related legal and professional fees.

The Company believes substantial errors were committed in the trial, including the failure of the trial court to render judgment as a matter of law that the Company did not owe EMC a fiduciary duty, and in the erroneous application by the jury of its instructions on the measure of damages. The judgment award of $0.6 million was recorded during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, and is included as an accrued liability in the January 29, 2005 consolidated balance sheet. The Company incurred legal expense during fiscal 2004 related to the EMC lawsuit of approximately $0.6 million. The expenses are included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2004.

Monterey Carpets, Inc., (“Monterey”) in connection with its previous 50% ownership interest in Chroma Systems Partners (“Chroma”), is a co-defendant in an alleged claim by Enron Energy Services, Inc. (“Enron”) that Chroma and its partners are liable for amounts related to certain energy contracts which existed between Chroma and Enron prior to the filing of Enron’s Chapter 11 proceedings. Settlement negotiations are on going and it is not possible to estimate the extent of any possible loss at this time. Monterey has filed its response and intends to vigorously contest Enron’s lawsuit. A mandatory mediation session is currently scheduled for June 2, 2005. During fiscal 2004, Monterey terminated its partnership interest in Chroma as part of the facility maximization project.

On August 18, 2004, the Company executed Amendment No. 3 (the “Amendment”) to its Senior Credit Facility. The Amendment provided for, among other things, 1) the transfer of certain of the broadloom manufacturing fixed assets located in Santa Ana, California to the Company’s facility located in Truro, Nova Scotia, 2) the disposal of and/or transfer to the Company of substantially all of the remaining Santa Ana, California fixed assets and transfer all or substantially all of the accounts receivable, inventory and other liquid current assets from Monterey Carpets, Inc. (“Monterey”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, to the Company, 3) the release of Monterey as a subsidiary guarantor under the subsidiary guarantee agreement and the security agreement and any other loan documents to which it is a party, 4) the exclusion from the financial covenants calculation of up to $10.0 million of costs related to the move and relocation to the Truro, Nova Scotia plant (the “Crossley transfer”), and 5) the reduction of the credit spread to LIBOR plus 2.75 on the Term B Loan. The Amendment further authorized the collateral agent to release any and all liens held by the collateral agent in or on the assets forming part of the Crossley transfer.

23

Effective May 1, 2004, the Company amended its Senior Credit Facility to revise certain covenants. The amended principal financial covenants are as follows:

The Company’s fixed charge coverage ratio and interest coverage ratio were 1.64:1.00 and 2.73:1.00, respectively, at January 29, 2005. As is customary in debt agreements, in the event the Company is not in compliance with the covenants of the Senior Credit Facility, the Company will also be subject to the provisions of a cross-default for the 9.75% Senior Subordinated Notes. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of January 29, 2005, and expects to remain in compliance throughout fiscal 2005, although no assurances to that effect can be given. The agreement also provides under certain conditions for an excess cash flow payment. At January 29, 2005, no such payment was required.

On August 10, 2004, the Company and its parent announced its intent to close its manufacturing facility in Santa Ana, California, and transfer the production to its existing Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada, facility (the “facility maximization project”). The facility maximization project was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on August 9, 2004, and is currently expected to be complete by the end of the Company’s second fiscal quarter in 2005. The Company had previously expected that the consolidation of the facilities would be completed by the end of the Company’s first fiscal quarter. However, the transfer of production was slowed to accommodate the training required to bring the 150 new associates up to the required level in addition to the completion of manufacturing system enhancements. It is currently estimated that the remaining costs will be approximately $5.4 million and consist of severance, moving, reinstallation, professional fees and other costs, including, among other things, production inefficiencies during the transition period. Our expectations are that the benefits of the project will begin to impact the income statement principally in the last quarter of this fiscal year.

During fiscal 2004, the Company incurred approximately $4.0 million in costs associated with the facility maximization project, which consist of professional fees, severance and other related costs. Costs of Goods Sold included $2.6 million and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses included $1.4 million of these expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Income. In addition the Company anticipates capital expenditures of approximately $3.4 million related to the project, $0.5 more than originally anticipated.

As part of the facility maximization project, the Company negotiated with the Nova Scotia government the forgiveness of the then remaining $1.2 million of Crossley’s sinking fund bonds debt outstanding. The forgiveness will be over the remaining five-year term of the current note and is based upon certain employee hours worked during the year and will commence in fiscal 2005. The debt will also be non-interest bearing.

The costs incurred and the anticipated expenditures remaining are as follows:

The accrued facility maximization costs at January 29, 2005 amounted to $0.8 million, which consisted of severance and other project related costs. These costs are included in Accrued Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.

24

Contractual Obligations

The following table contains a summary of the Company’s future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of January 29, 2005.

Management believes that cash generated by its operations and availability under its $50.0 million revolving credit line will be sufficient to fund the Company’s current commitments and planned requirements.

Purchase orders or contracts for the purchase of inventory and other goods and services are not included in the table above. We are not able to determine the aggregate amount of such purchase orders that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders may represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding agreements. Our purchase orders are based on our current distribution needs and are fulfilled by our vendors within short time horizons. We do not have significant agreements for the purchase of inventory or other goods specifying minimum quantities or set prices that exceed our expected requirements for three months.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements. Certain of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty and actual results could differ from these estimates. These judgments are based on our historical experience, terms of existing contracts, current economic trends in the industry, information provided by our customers, and information available from outside sources, as appropriate. The Company’s significant accounting policies include:

Basis of Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recognized when goods are shipped which is when legal title passes to the customer. For product installations subject to customer approval revenue is recognized upon acceptance by the customer. The Company provides certain installation services to customers utilizing independent third-party contractors. The billings and expenses for these services are included in net sales and cost of goods sold, respectively.

A customer claims reserve and allowance for product returns is established based upon historical claims experience as a percent of gross sales as of the balance sheet date. The allowance for customer claims is recorded upon shipment of goods and is recorded as a reduction of sales. While we believe that our customer claims reserve and allowance for product returns is adequate and that the judgment applied is appropriate based upon our historical experience for these items, actual amounts determined to be due and payable could differ and additional allowances may be required.

25

Foreign Currency Translation. Assets and liabilities of our Canadian, United Kingdom (“U.K.”) and Asian subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates. Income and expense items are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments are accumulated as a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency translation adjustments amounted to $(0.3) million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million, for the years ended January 25, 2003, January 31, 2004 and January 29, 2005, respectively, and are accumulated as a separate component of stockholder’s equity.

Impairment of Goodwill and Indefinite Lived Intangible Asset. In addition to the annual impairment tests required by SFAS No. 142, the Company may periodically evaluate the carrying value of its goodwill and indefinite lived intangible asset for potential impairment. Judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on legal factors, market conditions and operational performance. Future events could cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that the goodwill and indefinite lived intangible asset associated with acquired businesses is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Accounts Receivable Allowances. The Company provides allowances for expected cash discounts, returns, claims and doubtful accounts based upon historical experience and periodic evaluation of the financial condition of the Company’s customers and collectability of the Company’s accounts receivable. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to pay their debts, allowances recorded in the Company’s financial statements may not be adequate.

Inventory Reserves. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out, method. Reserves are established based on percentage markdowns applied to inventories aged for certain time periods and size of lot.

Income Taxes. The Company uses the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements using statutory rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the rate change.

Effects of Inflation

Petroleum-based products comprise a predominant portion of the cost of raw materials the Company uses in manufacturing. While the Company attempts to match cost increases with corresponding price increases, large increases in the cost of petroleum-based raw materials could adversely affect the financial results of the Company if it is unable to pass through such price increases in raw material costs to customers.

The impact of inflation on the Company’s operations has not been significant in recent years with the exception of petroleum based products noted above which have risen due to demand. However, there can be no assurance that a high rate of inflation in the future would not have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results if the Company is unable to pass through the increases.

Seasonality

The Company experiences seasonal fluctuations, with generally lower sales and gross profit in the first and fourth quarters of the fiscal year and higher sales and gross profit in the second and third quarters of the fiscal year. The seasonality of sales and profitability is primarily a result of disproportionately higher education end market sales during the summer months while schools generally are closed and floorcovering can be installed.

26

Reliance on Primary Third-Party Supplier of Nylon Yarn

Invista, currently supplies a majority of the Company’s requirements for nylon yarn, the primary raw material used in the Company’s floorcovering products. The unanticipated termination or interruption of the supply arrangement with Invista could have a material adverse effect on the Company because of the cost and delay associated with shifting this business to another supplier. Historically, the Company has not experienced significant interruptions in the supply of nylon yarn from Invista, although no assurances can be given.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141”) and SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 141 requires the use of the purchase method of accounting and prohibits the use of the pooling-of-interests method of accounting for business combinations. SFAS No. 141 also requires the recognition of acquired intangible assets apart from goodwill if the acquired intangible assets meet certain criteria. SFAS No. 141 applies to all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and for purchase business combinations completed on or after July 1, 2001.

SFAS No. 142 requires, among other things, that companies no longer amortize goodwill, but instead test goodwill for impairment at least annually using certain fair value based methods. In addition, SFAS No. 142 requires the identification of reporting units for the purposes of assessing potential future impairments of goodwill, requires the useful lives of other existing recognized intangible assets to be reassessed, if necessary, and cease amortization of intangible assets with an indefinite useful life. An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is required to be tested for impairment in accordance with the guidance in SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 142 is to be applied in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 to all goodwill and other intangible assets recognized at that date, regardless of when those assets were initially recognized. SFAS No. 142 requires a transitional goodwill impairment test six months from the date of adoption. Any impairment charge resulting from the transitional impairment tests will be reflected as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142 effective January 27, 2002. The Company expects to evaluate goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of each year.

The net income shown below has been adjusted to reflect the results for the respective periods as if SFAS No. 142 had been in effect in fiscal 2001 (in thousands). The impact to these items is shown net of tax.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS No. 150”). SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity as well as imposes additional disclosure requirements and is effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2004. The Company adopted the provisions of FASB 150 effective February 1, 2004, which did not have an impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosure about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits” (“SFAS 132”). The revision of SFAS 132 provides for additional disclosures including the description of the types of plan assets, investment strategy, measurement date(s), plan obligations, cash flows and components of net periodic benefit cost recognized in interim periods. The revision of SFAS 132 was effective for the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of January 31, 2004 and did not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs” (“SFAS No. 151”). SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on normal capacity of the production facilities. This statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 151 is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In November 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-13, “Applying the Conditions in Paragraph 42 of FASB Statement No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets in Determining Whether to Report Discontinued Operations” (“EITF 03-13”). Under the consensus, the approach for assessing whether cash flows of the component have been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity focuses on whether continuing cash flows are direct or indirect cash flows. Cash flows of the component would not be eliminated if the continuing cash flows to the entity are considered direct cash flows. The consensus should be applied to a component of an enterprise that is either disposed of or classified as held for sale in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2004. The adoption of EITF 03-13 is not expected to have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

27

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS 123R supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows.” SFAS No. 123 focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions and requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. This statement is effective for our annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 123R to determine its impact on our future financial statements.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets” (“SFAS No. 153”). SFAS No. 153 amends the guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions” to eliminate certain exceptions to the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. This statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No.153 is not expected to have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest rates. The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates and foreign currency.

Interest Rate Risk

Other than the 9.75% Notes, substantially all of our debt is variable rate debt. Therefore, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value of such debt but do impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. Conversely, for fixed rate debt, interest rate changes do not impact future cash flow and earnings, but do impact the fair market value of such debt, assuming other factors are held constant. At January 29, 2005, the Company had variable rate debt of $30.2 million and fixed rate debt of $178.0 million. The variable interest rate per annum applicable to borrowings under Senior Credit Facility is equal to the Company’s choice of (a) an adjusted rate based upon LIBOR plus a Eurodollar margin or (b) an alternative base rate, as defined by Senior Credit Facility, plus a base rate margin. The Eurodollar margin and the base rate margin adjust quarterly on a sliding scale based on our total leverage ratio for the immediately preceding four fiscal quarters. See “Note 10 Long-Term Debt” in the accompanying financial statements. The impact on our results of operations of a one-point change in the interest rate on the outstanding balance of our term loan for fiscal 2004 would be approximately $(0.2)million, net of tax.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

If on January 29, 2005, currency exchange rates were to decline by 10% against the U.S. dollar and that decline remained in place for 2005, we estimate, based on our year–end 2004 investments in financial instruments and holding everything else constant, that the effect on our fiscal 2005 net earnings would not be material to the financial condition of the Company.

28

See the consolidated financial statements of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. and subsidiaries included herein beginning on page F-1 and listed on the index to financial statements set forth in Item 15 (a) of this Form 10-K report.

Effective December 20, 2004, the Company engaged Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005. We dismissed our previous independent accountant, Ernst & Young, LLP, effective December 20, 2004. In connection with the audits of the fiscal years ended January 25, 2003 and January 31, 2004 there was no disagreement on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope and procedures which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young LLP, would have caused Ernst & Young, LLP to make reference to the matter in their report.

As of January 29, 2005, the Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective for gathering, analyzing and disclosing the information the Company is required to disclose in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer also concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the year that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect these controls.

On April 25, 2005, Stephen M. Powell, Vice President of Finance of the Company, informed the Company that he would be leaving his position effective May 13, 2005. Mr. Powell does not have an employment agreement with the Company.

29

PART III

The following table sets forth the names and ages for each of the directors of Tandus Group, Inc. and each of our directors and executive officers and the positions they hold:

Set forth is a brief description of the business experience of each of our directors and executive officers.

Edgar M. (Mac) Bridger has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since February 1997, and as a director of the Company since February 1997. Prior to that time, he has served as the Company’s President from December 1993 to February 1997. In addition, Mr. Bridger served as Vice President of Sales from February 1993 to November 1993 and served as National Sales Manager from July 1991 to January 1993.

Lee H. Schilling has served as Senior Vice President of the Company since February 2005. Prior to that time, he served as Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales of the Company from June 1994 to February 2005, and as Vice President of Marketing and Sales from July 1987 to June 1994. From January 1985 to July 1987, Mr. Schilling served as National Sales Manager.

Leonard F. Ferro has served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since June 2004. Mr. Ferro was employed by Galey & Lord, Inc. in various financial capacities from September, 1998 to June, 2004, most recently as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer. Mr. Ferro was employed by Collins & Aikman Corporation, a former owner of Tandus’ Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. from February 1994 to September 1998, most recently as Corporate Controller. He is a C.P.A. and practiced in public accounting for 13 years.

Stephen M. Powell has served as Vice President of Finance of the Company since February 2004. Prior to that time, he served as Controller of the Company from April 2001 to February 2004. Prior to joining the Company in April 2001, Mr. Powell served as Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Chattem, Inc. for 5 years. He is a C.P.A. and practiced in public accounting for 8 years.

Wallace J. Hammel has served as Vice President of Manufacturing of the Company since April 1994. From July 1991 to April 1994, Mr. Hammel served as the Director of the Customer Service and Claims of the Company. Mr. Hammel joined the Company in March 1983 as a Finishing Manager.

Jeffery M. Raabe has served as Senior Vice President of Sales of the Company since February 2005. Prior to that time, he served as Vice President of Sales of the Company from February 1996 to February

30

2005 and as the Southeast Direct Sales manager and Director of North American Sales of the Company from October 1990 to February 1996. Mr. Raabe joined the Company in January 1989 as a Contract Specialist in Atlanta, Georgia.

Henry L. Millsaps, Jr. has served as Vice President of Human Resources of the Company since April 1995. Mr. Millsaps joined the Company in 1980 and served as Human Resource Director from March 1988 until April 1995.

Ralph H. Grogan joined the Company as Chief Executive Officer and President of Monterey in December 2002. Prior to that time, Mr. Grogan was with Burlington Industries, Inc. for 22 years. While with Burlington Industries, Inc., he served most recently as President of Burlington House Floor Accent Division from 1999 to 2002 and as Vice President and General Manager of Lees Carpet from 1994 until 1999. Mr. Grogan has 15 years of carpet industry experience.

Ronald N. Beck has been Chairman of the Board of Tandus Group since January 2001. He joined Oaktree Capital Management, LLC as Managing Director in May 2000 and is the co-head of the Principal Opportunities Group, which includes OCM Principal Opportunities Fund II, L.P. and its predecessor funds. Prior to joining Oaktree Capital Management, LLC, Mr. Beck managed Seneca Capital Partners LLC, a private equity investment firm that he co-founded in 1996. Mr. Beck holds a B.A. in Economics from Stanford University, a J.D. from Stanford Law School and M.B.A. from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Stephen M. Burns has been a director of Tandus Group since November 1996. He has been a Vice President of Quad-C Management, Inc. since 1992. Prior to joining Quad-C Management, Mr. Burns was Vice President of Paribas North American and Paribas.

Steven M. Farsht has been a director of Tandus Group since May 2004. He is a General Partner of Norwest Equity Partners. Prior to joining Norwest Equity Partners in 1997, Mr. Farsht was employed by Arthur Andersen LLP from 1992 to 1996. Mr. Farsht holds a B.A. in accounting from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and an M.B.A. from the J.L. Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

Caleb S. Kramer has been a director of the Company since January 2001 and a director of Tandus Group since January 2001. He is a Managing Director of Oaktree Capital Management, LLC. Prior to joining Oaktree Capital Management, LLC in May 2000. Mr. Kramer co-founded Seneca Capital Partners, LLC, a private equity investment firm. From 1994 to 1996, Mr. Kramer was employed by Archon Capital Partners, an investment firm. Mr. Kramer holds a B.A. in economics from the University of Virginia.

Jason A. Mehring has been a director of the Company since January 2001 and a director of Tandus Group since January 2001. He is a Principal with BACI and has been with Bank of America Corporation and its predecessors since 1994. Prior to that time, Mr. Mehring was with Firststar, a regional commercial bank based in Milwaukee. Mr. Mehring holds a B.B.A. from the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire and an M.B.A. from the J.L. Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.

Robert F. Perille has been a director of Tandus Group since January 2001. He is currently a principal of Silver Birch Capital Partners. Mr. Perille was previously a Managing Director of BACI, and was employed by Bank of America Corporation and its predecessors from 1980 through 2003. Mr. Perille holds a B.A. from Lawrence University and a M.B.A. from Babson College.

31

Term

Our Directors serve a term of one year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Our officers serve at the pleasure of the Board.

Committees of the Board of Directors of Tandus Group

Tandus Group’s board of directors currently has three standing committees. Its executive committee is composed of Mr. Beck, who is the chairman, and Messrs. Bridger and Perille. Its compensation committee is composed of Mr. Perille, who is the chairman, and Messrs. Beck and Bridger. The Company has an audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The audit committee is composed of Mr. Mehring, who is the chairman, and Messrs. Farsht and Kramer. Each of these committees was established in October 2001. The executive committee met 0 times in 2004, the compensation committee met 0 times in 2004 and the audit committee met 5 times in 2004. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Mehring is an audit committee financial expert and that Mr. Mehring is independent as such term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act using the definition of independent under the rules of NASDAQ.

Committees of the Board of Directors of the Company

The Company’s Board of Directors does not have any standing committees. The committees of the Board of Directors of Tandus Group serve as the committees of the Board of Directors of the Company.

Director Compensation

None of Tandus Group’s or the Company’s directors are entitled to receive any fees for serving as directors. All of Tandus Group’s and our directors are reimbursed for out-of pocket expenses related to their service as directors.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, and persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics is available on the Company’s investor relations website at www.tandus.com. The Company intends to post amendments to this Code of Ethics and waivers to the extent applicable at this location of this website. In addition, the Company will provide without charge a copy of the Code of Ethics to any person submitting a written request for the same to Investor Relations, 311 Smith Industrial Boulevard, Dalton, GA 30721.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

The Company does not have a class of equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

32

Executive Compensation

The following table sets forth certain information concerning compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and each of the other four most highly compensated executive officers (“Named Executive Officers”) during the fiscal years presented.

Summary Compensation Table

33

Director Compensation

None of Tandus Group’s or the Company’s directors are entitled to receive any fees for serving as directors. All of Tandus Group’s and our directors are reimbursed for out-of pocket expenses related to their service as directors.

Stock Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

No options were granted during fiscal 2004 to the named executive officers.

Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year End Option Values

No options were exercised by the named executive officers in fiscal 2004 and there is no market for Tandus’s common stock.

Retirement Plan

Provided certain eligibility requirements are met, at the end of each calendar month pay credits are added to a participant’s account under the Company’s Pension Account Plan (the “Plan”). The percentage of compensation is based on the participant’s length of credited service and compensation (as defined in the Plan) during that month. For participants aged 50 or older, the percentage of compensation is based on either credited service or age, whichever results in a higher percentage.

The following chart sets forth how pay credits were determined under the Company’s plan:

Participants make no contributions to the Plan. Employer contributions are 100% vested after five years of service or at age 65, whichever was earlier, and might have vested under certain other circumstances as set forth in the Plan. The estimated annual benefits payable upon retirement at normal retirement age under the Plan for Messrs. Bridger, Schilling, Ferro, Raabe and Hammel are, $11,522, $7,493, $0, $16,144 and $8,962, respectively. Participants in the Plan have the option, however, of receiving the value of their vested account in a lump sum following termination of employment. During fiscal 2002, the Company elected to freeze the plan.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of our Board of Directors serves as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors.

34

Employment Agreements

The Company has no employment agreement with any named executive officer.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of Tandus Group’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) also serves as our compensation committee. During fiscal 2004, the Compensation Committee was comprised of Messrs. Bridger, Beck, and Perille (Chairman). The Compensation Committee is responsible for:

Our compensation policies are designed to align the financial interests of our management with those of our shareholders, and to take into account our operating environment and expectations for continued growth and enhanced profitability. Compensation for each of our executive officers generally consists of a base salary and the opportunity to receive an annual bonus.

The Compensation Committee’s current philosophy is that the predominate portion of an executive’s compensation should be based directly upon the value of incentive compensation in the form of cash bonuses. The Compensation Committee believes that providing executives with the opportunity to obtain cash bonuses, while maintaining our base salaries at competitive levels, will enable us to attract and retain executives with the outstanding management abilities and entrepreneurial spirit who are essential to our success.

Furthermore, the Compensation Committee believes that this approach to compensation, as well as the opportunity to receive cash bonuses based on our financial performance, motivates executives to perform to their fullest potential.

Base Salary. At least annually, the Compensation Committee reviews salary recommendations for our executives and then approves such recommendations, with any modifications it considers appropriate. The annual salary recommendations for such persons are made under the ultimate direction of the Chief Executive Officer, based on total compensation packages for comparable companies in our industry, as well as evaluations of the individual executive’s past and expected future performance.

Annual Bonuses. The Compensation Committee determined the bonus in fiscal 2004 to be paid to our Chief Executive Officer based upon our bonus plan which outlines certain profitability targets. A bonus may also be paid to our Chief Executive Officer at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Bonus recommendations for Named Executive Officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer, were made under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer and were reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.

Compensation of Chief Executive Officer. The base salary paid to Mr. Bridger is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee and may be adjusted based on competitive compensation information available to the Compensation Committee, his overall compensation package and the Compensation Committee’s assessment of his past experience and its expectation as to his future contributions in leading us and our businesses.

35

The Compensation Committee evaluates our compensation policies and procedures with respect to executives on an ongoing basis. Although the Compensation Committee believes that current compensation policies have been successful in aligning the financial interests of executive officers with those of our shareholders and with our performance, it continues to examine what modifications, if any, should be implemented to further link executive compensation with both individual and our performance. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, generally limits amounts that can be deducted for compensation paid to certain executives to $1,000,000 unless certain requirements are met. No executive officer receives compensation in excess of $1,000,000 and therefore there are no compensation amounts that are nondeductible at present. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor the applicability of Section 162(m) to our compensation program.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee

36

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is currently comprised of three members, each of which is an “independent director,” as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate and Jason Mehring qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under federal securities laws. The Audit Committee’s purposes are to assist the Board in overseeing: (a) the quality and integrity of our financial statements; (b) the qualifications and independence of our independent auditors; and (c) the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm.

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has:

Based on the review and discussions noted above and our independent registered public accounting firm’s report to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005.

This report is not to be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement that incorporates by reference this Form 10-K into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, and it is not to be otherwise deemed filed under either such Act.

Submitted by the Audit Committee

37

All of our outstanding capital stock is owned by Tandus Group. The table below sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of Tandus Group’s common stock as of April 15, 2005 by (i) each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of any class of Tandus Group’s common stock, (ii) each of the directors of Tandus Group and each of our directors and named executed officers and (iii) all of the directors of Tandus Group and all of our directors and named executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, which generally attributes beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons or entities identified in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws.