Back to GetFilings.com

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 001-13769

CHITTENDEN CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Registrant’s Telephone Number: (802) 658-4000

NOT APPLICABLE

Former Name, Former Address and Formal Fiscal Year

If Changed Since Last Report

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). YES x NO ¨

At April 21, 2005, there were 46,401,555 shares of the Corporation’s $1.00 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

2

Chittenden Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

Chittenden Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Chittenden Corporation

Consolidated Statements of CashFlows

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

NOTE 1 – ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year or any other interim period.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in its 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. For interim reporting purposes, the Company follows the same basic accounting policies and considers each interim period as an integral part of an annual period.

There were no new accounting policies or changes to existing policies adopted in the first quarter of 2005 which had a significant effect on the results of operations or statement of financial condition.

NOTE 2 – ACQUIRED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

NOTE 3 – GOODWILL

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are as follows:

NOTE 4 – CAPITAL TRUST SECURITIES

On May 21, 2002, Chittenden Capital Trust I, (the “Trust”) issued $125 million of 8% trust preferred securities (“Securities”) to the public and invested the proceeds from this offering in an equivalent amount of junior subordinated debentures issued by (the “Company”). These debentures are the sole asset of the Trust. The proceeds

6

from the offering, which was net of $4.4 million of issuance costs, were primarily used to fund the cash consideration paid in the Granite Bank transaction. The Securities pay interest quarterly, are mandatorily redeemable on July 1, 2032 and may be redeemed by the Trust at par any time on or after July 1, 2007. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the Securities issued by the Trust.

Concurrent with the issuance of these Securities, Chittenden entered into interest rate swap agreements with two counterparties, in which the Company will receive 8% fixed on the notional amount of $125 million, while paying the counterparties a variable rate based on the three month LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate), plus approximately 122 basis points.

NOTE 5 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The Company’s comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is presented below (amounts in thousands):

NOTE 6 – EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table summarizes the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

The following table summarizes options that could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future which were not included in the computation of the common stock equivalents because to do so would have been antidilutive:

NOTE 7 – STOCK PLANS

The Company has two stock option plans, which are described more fully in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004. The Company accounts for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock option-

7

related compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock options granted in the respective periods.

The resulting pro forma compensation cost may not be representative of the cost to be expected in future periods and is primarily affected by the number of stock options granted in a particular period.

NOTE 8 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

Pension Plan

The Company sponsors a qualified defined benefit pension plan that covers substantially all of its employees. The Chittenden Pension Account Plan (“Chittenden Plan”) covers substantially all employees who meet minimum age and service requirements and provides benefits based on years of service and compensation earned during those years of service.

Net periodic pension expense components included in employee benefits in the consolidated statements of income are as follows:

8

As Chittenden previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004, due to a prior contribution made in excess of the minimum required amounts, the Company does not anticipate a required contribution during 2005.

NOTE 9 – BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company has identified Commercial Banking as its reportable operating business segment based on the fact that the results of operations are viewed as a single strategic unit by the chief operating decision-maker. The Commercial Banking segment is comprised of the five Commercial Banking subsidiaries and Chittenden Connecticut Corporation, which provide similar products and services, have similar distribution methods, types of customers and regulatory responsibilities. Commercial Banking derives its revenue from a wide range of banking services, including lending activities, acceptance of demand, savings and time deposits, business services, investment management and trust, brokerage services, and mortgage banking.

Immaterial operating segments of the Company’s operations, which do not have similar characteristics to the commercial banking operations and do not meet the quantitative thresholds requiring disclosure, are included in the Other category in the disclosure of business segments below. Revenue derived from these segments includes commissions from insurance related products and services, as well as other operations associated with the parent holding company.

The accounting policies used in the disclosure of business segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies included in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004. The consolidation adjustments reflect certain eliminations of inter-segment revenue, cash and parent company investments in subsidiaries.

9

NOTE 10 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

On April 20, 2005, the Company declared dividends of $0.18 per share or approximately $8.3 million, to be paid on May 13, 2005 to shareholders of record on April 29, 2005.

NOTE 11 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

In the normal course of business, to meet the financing needs of their customers and to reduce their own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, the Banks are parties to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, held for purposes other than trading. The financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Banks’ exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument, for loan commitments and standby letters of credit, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments, assuming that the amounts are fully advanced and that collateral or other security is of no value. The Banks use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as they do for on-balance sheet instruments. The Banks evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Banks upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.

Commitments to originate loans, unused lines of credit, and unadvanced portions of construction loans are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the amounts presented below do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Banks to guarantee the performance by a customer to a third party. These guarantees are issued primarily to support public and private borrowing arrangements, bond financing, and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan commitments to customers.

Financial instruments whose contractual amounts represent off-balance sheet risk at March 31, 2005 (in thousands):

NOTE 12 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R (“SFAS 123R”)(revised December 2004), Share-based Payment, which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. This statement does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in SFAS 123, however non-employee directors are scoped into SFAS 123R. This statement requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. SFAS 123R allows the use of valuation models other than the Black-Scholes model prescribed in SFAS 123, specifically the Binomial Lattice method. Therefore, the pro forma costs of stock option expense estimated in Note 1 using the Black-Scholes method may not be representative of the costs recognized by the Company upon adoption of SFAS 123R. The Company is still in the process of analyzing the cost of stock options under SFAS 123R. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission delayed the effective date for SFAS 123R, which allows companies to implement the statement at the beginning of their first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005, which would be January 1, 2006 for the Company.

10

This report contains statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “intend,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue” or similar words. The Company intends these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss the Company’s future expectations, contain projections of the Company’s future results of operations or financial condition, or state other “forward-looking” information.

There may be events in the future that the Company is not able to predict accurately or control and that may cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations described in forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those discussed in this report. These differences may be the result of various factors, including changes in general, national or regional economic conditions, changes in loan default and charge-off rates, reductions in deposit levels necessitating increased borrowing to fund loans and investments, changes in interest rates, changes in levels of noninterest income and expense related activities, changes in the methods or rates used by governments to assess taxes against the Company including income that is exempted from taxation or expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes, and other risk factors identified from time to time in the Company’s periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The factors referred to above include many, but not all, of the factors that could impact the Company’s ability to achieve the results described in any forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. You should be aware that the occurrence of the events described above and elsewhere in this report could harm the Company’s business, prospects, operating results or financial condition. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of future events or developments.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2004. The Company considers the following accounting policies and related estimates to be the most critical in their potential effect on its financial position or results of operations:

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through a charge against current earnings to the provision for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is based on management’s estimate of the amount required to reflect the probable inherent losses in the loan portfolio, based on circumstances and conditions known at each reporting date in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). There are three components of the allowance for loan losses: 1) specific reserves for loans considered to be impaired or for other loans for which management considers a specific reserve to be necessary; 2) allocated reserves based upon management’s formula-based process for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; and 3) a non-specific environmentally-driven allowance considered necessary by management based on its assessment of other qualitative factors. The allowance for loan losses is a significant estimate and is regularly reviewed by the Company for adequacy using a consistent, systematic methodology which assesses such factors as changes in the mix and volume of the loan portfolio; trends in portfolio credit quality, including delinquency and charge-off rates; and current economic conditions that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay. Adverse changes in management’s assessment of these factors could lead to additional provisions for loan losses. The Company’s methodology

11

with respect to the assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is more fully discussed in its Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004.

Goodwill Impairment. The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangibles, effective January 1, 2002. The statement addresses the method of identifying and measuring goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination, eliminates further amortization of goodwill, and requires periodic impairment evaluations of goodwill. Impairment evaluations are required to be performed annually and may be required more frequently if certain conditions indicating potential impairment exist. In the event that the Company were to determine that its goodwill were impaired, the recognition of an impairment charge could have an adverse impact on its results of operations in the period that the impairment occurred or on its financial position.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs). Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or the sale of financial assets on a servicing-retained basis. Capitalized servicing rights are amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying servicing rights by predominant characteristics, such as interest rates and original loan terms. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions. When the book value of an individual stratum exceeds its fair value, an impairment reserve is recognized so that each individual stratum is carried at the lower of its amortized book value or fair value. In periods of falling market interest rates, accelerated loan prepayment speeds can adversely impact the fair value of these servicing rights relative to their book value. In the event that the fair value of these assets were to increase in the future, the Company can recognize the increased fair value to the extent of the impairment allowance but cannot recognize an asset in excess of its amortized book value. Future changes in management’s assessment of the impairment of these servicing assets, as a result of changes in observable market data relating to market interest rates, loan prepayment speeds, and other factors, could impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations either positively or adversely.

Interest Income Recognition. Interest on loans is included in income as earned based upon interest rates applied to unpaid principal. Interest is not accrued on loans 90 days or more past due unless they are adequately secured and in the process of collection or on other loans when management believes collection is doubtful. All loans considered impaired are nonaccruing. Interest on nonaccruing loans is recognized as payments are received when the ultimate collectibility of interest is no longer considered doubtful. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest previously accrued is reversed against current-period interest income; therefore an increase in loans on nonaccrual status could have an adverse impact on interest income recognized in future periods.

Income Taxes. The Company estimates income tax expense in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates for each period for which a statement of operations is presented. This involves estimating the Company’s actual current tax exposure as well as assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as timing of the deduction of expenses, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company must also assess the likelihood that any deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent that recovery is not likely, a valuation allowance must be established. Significant management judgment is required in determining income tax expense, and deferred tax assets and liabilities. As of March 31, 2005, there were no valuation allowances set aside against any deferred tax assets.

12

Conversion and Restructuring Charges. The Company recognizes restructuring charges in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146 Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS 146”) and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 10 Restructuring and Impairment Charges “SAB 10”, which contain specific guidance regarding the types of, and circumstances under which, certain expenses can be accrued. In general, SFAS 146 and SAB 10 require that the Company have a detailed plan in place, which has been communicated to substantially all the employees affected in the staff reduction, branch closures/sales, or computer conversions. Significant management judgment is required in estimating the amount of expense that is appropriate to recognize in relation to these plans.

Management Overview

Chittenden’s first quarter of 2005 recorded a 9% increase in net income and an 11% increase in earnings per share over the comparable quarter of a year ago. The increase in net income primarily related to higher net interest income, which resulted from a 5% increase in average earning assets as well as a 13 basis point increase in the net interest margin. Chittenden continued to experience strong asset quality with NPAs to loans of 50 basis points and net chargeoffs of 1 basis point.

Results of Operations

Chittenden posted first quarter 2005 net income of $0.41 per diluted share, compared to $0.37 per diluted share posted in the first quarter of last year and $0.43 per diluted share on a linked quarter basis. Net income for the first quarter of 2005 was $19.1 million, compared to $17.5 million recorded in the same quarter a year ago and $20.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2004. Return on average equity (ROE) was 12.46% for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared with 11.97% for the same period in 2004 and 12.95% for a quarter ago. Return on average assets (ROA) was 1.28% for the first quarter of 2005, an increase of 7 basis points from the first quarter of last year and a decrease of 3 basis points on a linked quarter basis.

Net interest income on a tax equivalent basis for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $59.4 million, flat on a linked quarter basis and up $4.4 million for the same period a year ago. The increase in net interest income from the same period a year ago was primarily due to the growth in average earning assets as well as a higher net interest margin. The Company’s net interest margin for the first quarter was 4.30%, an increase of 3 basis points from the fourth quarter of last year and 13 basis points from the first quarter of 2004. The increase from both periods was due to higher yields on loans, driven by increases in the prime rate, as well as continued improvement in the Company’s asset mix. The contribution from the loan portfolio increased 3% to 74% of average earning assets and the yield on the loan portfolio increased 46 basis points to 5.75% from the same period of a year ago.

13

The following table presents an analysis of average rates and yields on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004: