Back to GetFilings.com

FORM 10-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

For the transition period from              to            

Commission File Number 0-31051

SMTC CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

635 Hood Road, Markham, Ontario, Canada

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

98-0197680

(IRS Employer Identification Number)

L3R 4N6

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 905-479-1810

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common stock, par value $.01 per share.

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x    No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes ¨    No x

The aggregate market value of common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $28,000,000 on July 2, 2004, including the value of the common stock for which the exchangeable shares of the registrant’s subsidiary, SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Canada, are exchangeable. For purposes of the foregoing sentence, the term “affiliate” includes each director and executive officer of the registrant and each holder of more than 10% of the registrant’s common stock. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The computation of the aggregate market value is based upon the closing price of the common stock as reported on The Nasdaq National Market on July 2, 2004, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of April 13, 2005, SMTC Corporation had 9,170,619 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and one share of special voting stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding. As of April 13, 2005, SMTC Corporation’s subsidiary, SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Canada, had 5,470,714 exchangeable shares outstanding, excluding 2,477,597 exchangeable shares owned by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, SMTC Nova Scotia Company, each of which is exchangeable for one share of common stock of SMTC Corporation.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the registrant’s 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Report.

PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements as defined under the federal securities laws. Actual results could vary materially. Factors that could cause actual results to vary materially are described herein and in other documents. Readers should pay particular attention to the considerations described in the section of this report entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors that May Affect Future Results.” Readers should also carefully review any risk factors described in other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 1:    Business

BUSINESS

Overview

SMTC Corporation (“We” or “SMTC” or the “Company”) provides advanced electronics manufacturing services, or EMS, to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, primarily in the industrial, enterprise computing and networking, and communications market segments. We currently service our customers through five manufacturing and technology centers strategically located in key technology and cost-effective corridors in the United States, Canada and Mexico. Our full range of value-added supply chain services include product design, procurement, prototyping, cable and harness interconnect, high precision enclosures, printed circuit board assembly, test, final system build, comprehensive supply chain management, packaging, global distribution and after-sales support.

We have customer relationships with industry leading OEMs such as IBM, EMC² and Ingenico. We developed these relationships by capitalizing on the continuing trend of OEMs to outsource manufacturing services, to consolidate their supply base and to form long-term strategic partnerships with selected high quality EMS providers. We work closely with and are highly responsive to our customers throughout the design, manufacturing and distribution process, providing value-added services that allow our customers to focus on their core competencies of sales, marketing and research and development. We seek to grow our business through the addition of new, high quality customers and the expansion of our activity with existing customers.

We believe that our key competitive advantages include our strategic partnership approach to working with customers, flexibility and responsiveness, track record of quality and performance, our commodity management capabilities, leading edge equipment and processes that are consistent from site to site, a customer-focused team-based approach, global supply chain management capabilities and web-based systems that electronically link us with our customers and suppliers in real time, enhancing our supply chain management capabilities.

During fiscal year 2001, in response to excess capacity caused by the slowing technology end market, we commenced a restructuring program aimed at reducing our cost structure. Actions taken by management to improve capacity utilization included closing our Denver, Colorado assembly facility and our Haverhill, Massachusetts interconnect facility, re-sizing our Mexico and Ireland facilities and reducing our excess equipment.

Due to the continuing economic downturn in 2002, the Company took further steps to realign its cost structure and plant capacity. During 2003, we closed sites in Donegal, Ireland, Austin, Texas, Charlotte, North Carolina and sold our Appleton, Wisconsin manufacturing operations.

2

In late 2003, we developed a broad-based transformation plan designed to restructure, refinance and restore profitability and growth. This plan involved operational optimization programs, refinancing, stakeholder stabilization initiatives, strategy development and organizational renewal. Through 2004 we initiated and executed on each component of the plan including a recapitalization consisting of three main components: a private placement of equity securities, a new secured credit facility and a transaction with the Company’s pre-existing lenders to repay a portion of the Company’s pre-existing debt and restructure the balance of the Company’s pre-existing debt. We refer to the recapitalization in this report as the “Recapitalization Transaction.” The Recapitalization Transaction was completed and closed on June 1, 2004.

Other initiatives involved redefining the mandate of the Markham site as the Company’s technical center of excellence, shifting higher volume production to our Chihuahua site, installation of a new senior management team and development of several new strategic marketing and sales programs.

Industry Background

The EMS industry provides manufacturing services to OEMs in the electronics marketplace. We believe the EMS market is returning to growth, fueled by the increased outsourcing of manufacturing by OEMs, by OEMs’ need for increasing flexibility to respond to rapidly changing markets, technologies and accelerating product life cycles and to lower total cost. We believe that OEMs decide to outsource manufacturing to take advantage of the technology and manufacturing expertise of EMS companies, eliminate manufacturing overhead, reduce time-to-market of products, improve supply chain efficiency, and access worldwide cost effective, high quality manufacturing capabilities.

Historically, OEMs were vertically integrated manufacturers that invested significantly in manufacturing assets and facilities around the world to manufacture, service and distribute their products. EMS originated as primarily labor intensive functions outsourced by OEMs to obtain additional capacity during periods of high demand. Early EMS providers were essentially subcontractors, providing production capacity on a transactional basis. However, with significant advances in manufacturing process technology, EMS providers developed additional capabilities and were able to improve quality and dramatically reduce OEMs’ costs. Furthermore, as the capabilities of EMS companies expanded, an increasing number of OEMs adopted and relied upon EMS outsourcing strategies. Over time, OEMs engaged EMS providers to perform a broader array of manufacturing services, including design and development activities. In recent years, EMS providers have further expanded their range of services to include advanced manufacturing, packaging and distribution and overall supply chain management. In addition, many OEMs are reducing the number of vendors from which outsourced services are purchased, and are partnering with EMS suppliers that can provide a total service solution on a national or global basis, to lower costs and improve end-to-end efficiencies.

By using EMS providers, OEMs are able to focus on their core competencies, including product development, sales and marketing, while leveraging the manufacturing efficiency and capital investment of EMS providers. OEMs use EMS providers to enhance their competitive position by:

3

SMTC Capabilities and Performance

SMTC has developed and implemented unique operating models and management systems to offer greater customer responsiveness, efficiency, flexibility and cost effectiveness. The goal is to provide a higher level of accountability to customers and an enhanced capability to exceed their expectations. Our customers benefit from the following capabilities and performance:

Performance.    SMTC defines its performance by the standards and performance metrics of its customers. We bring a strong record of quality and one time delivery at a highly competitive cost.

Understanding the Customer.    A hallmark of SMTC’s customer partnership model is to maintain a detailed understanding of its customers’ businesses including key goals, strategies and manufacturing requirements. We pride ourselves in working closely with our customers at all organizational levels to respond quickly and effectively to changing conditions allowing our customers to capitalize on opportunities.

Operational Footprint.    SMTC’s full range of capabilities and operational footprint are well suited for highly cost competitive medium volume and high mix manufacturing.

Capacity and Scalability.    SMTC’s approach to capacity planning and scalability is to retain a large footprint in key locations, configured with a capital equipment base that can quickly be adjusted and optimized through variability in shift labor. This allows us to expand rapidly in a cost effective manner to meet changes in customer demand.

Consistent Manufacturing Methods.    All of SMTC’s sites operate under the same model with identical systems, processes and equipment. This enables customers to seamlessly transfer their production to alternative sites to reduce costs and respond to shifts in demand.

Commodity Management.    SMTC’s Commodity Management Group provides customers with product life cycle analysis identifying high risk components due to obsolescence or technology upgrades and provides recommendations to maintain a continuous production flow.

Automated Management Methods and Tools.    SMTC has a web-based system through which it can communicate, collaborate and plan throughout the entire supply chain in real-time with its customers and suppliers. This system accelerates the timeliness and effectiveness of decision making and the efficiency and flexibility with which SMTC can respond to customers experiencing unexpected market fluctuations. SMTC employs state of the art quality assurance systems, manufacturing process planning and continuous improvement methodologies.

Supply Chain Management.    SMTC works with its customers to establish customized inventory, logistics and distribution services to ensure that any unique delivery requirements are met. These systems focus on minimizing the risk of inventory shortfalls or excesses and improve overall cost effectiveness.

4

SMTC Strategy

Our objective is to create increasing long term value to our stockholders through restoration of sustained profitability and growth. A cornerstone to SMTC’s strategy is to provide OEM customers worldwide a complete EMS solution, offering the advantages of electronics outsourcing, such as access to advanced manufacturing technologies, reduced costs and faster time-to-market. Our key strategies include:

Provide Outstanding Customer Service and Performance.    Customer retention and acquisition require solid day-in day-out operational performance that provides customers with high quality manufacturing and systems integration services and on-time delivery at a competitive price. Key competitive differentiators include high customer responsiveness and flexibility, a strong customer partnership model and direct senior management involvement. We define our mission as acting as a true partner with our customers, and we take a thoughtful, strategic approach to understanding each customer’s goals, strategies, operations and products to provide a better overall service. SMTC’s senior executive team is involved in all stages with our customers, from objective setting, transition planning, implementation and program monitoring.

Focus on Well Defined Customer Markets.    SMTC focuses on specific customer sectors that align well with the Company’s capabilities. Customers with unique medium volume to high mix production requirements with a need for a high level of responsiveness to changing market demands are particularly well suited for SMTC’s capabilities.

Provide Advanced Technological Capabilities and Comprehensive Service Offerings.    We remain committed to enhancing our capabilities and value-added services to become an integral part of our customers’ operations. Through our investment in leading-edge assembly and logistics technologies, as well as our investment in design, engineering and test capabilities, we are able to supply our customers a variety of advanced design and manufacturing solutions. These capabilities include micro ball grid arrays, complex circuitry layouts, manufacturing and testing of wireless products and manufacturing of ethernet cards, among others. Additionally, building on our integrated engineering and manufacturing capabilities, we provide our customers with services ranging from initial product design and prototype production to final product assembly, test and distribution directly to our and their customers. We believe that this provides greater control over quality, delivery and costs and enables us to offer our customers a complete, end-to-end solution that is cost effective.

Maintain a Competitive, Scalable Cost Structure.    We maintain a competitive cost structure that not only delivers highly competitive pricing to customers but also is both variable and scalable as market conditions dictate. We strive to improve profitability through tight cost containment measures, performance excellence, leveraging fixed costs and increased capacity utilization.

Our Services

Our full range of value-added supply chain services spans the entire electronic product life cycle from new product introduction and development through to maturity and end of life and includes product design, procurement, prototyping, cable and harness interconnect, high precision enclosures, printed circuit board assembly, test, final system build, comprehensive supply chain management, packaging, global distribution and after-sales support. More specifically, our services include:

Product Development.    We provide services across the entire product life cycle including product design, prototyping, qualification testing, value and sustaining engineering through product end of life.

Product Assembly.    We provide advanced product assembly and test services combined with leading edge manufacturing equipment and processes. Our flexible environment can support low to high volume production and a wide range of product mix and complexity requirements.

Interconnect.    We are experienced in the design, development and manufacture of interconnect assemblies such as optical and electrical cable and harness assemblies.

5

Enclosures.    We offer customers sheet metal fabrication services used in the assembly of a broad range of electronic enclosures.

System Integration.    We offer a broad range of full system build capabilities to support our end-to-end solutions. The system integration process is designed to meet all customer requirements and deliver a final product directly to the end user.

Our Customers

We target OEMs primarily in the industrial, enterprise computing and networking, and communications sectors. Revenue in 2004 was attributed to the following industry sectors: 56.5% from industrial, 30.5% from enterprise computing and networking, and 13.0% from communications. We have focused on developing relationships with a larger number of industrial customers to reduce exposure to the volatility of certain electronics sectors.

We have customer relationships with industry leading OEMs such as IBM, EMC² and Ingenico. The electronic products we assemble and manufacture can be found in a wide array of end-products including:

Marketing and Sales

We market our services through a focused strategy that emphasizes our competitive differentiators in servicing our customers. In addition to developing relationships with established industry leading OEMs, we also target selected emerging companies. We target prospective customers in a range of sectors including industrial, enterprise computing and networking, and communications markets. We are focused on building relationships with customers that require a volume of production that complements our customer-focused approach and supply chain offerings. We position the Company to be highly responsive and flexible with strong focus on customer attention from the executive level to the factory floor. Our strongest marketing tool is customer references, which we believe are earned by a history of solid performance.

We have a mix of established direct sales representatives and manufacturer representative companies throughout Canada and the United States. Our sales offices are primarily located within our manufacturing facilities. When a customer opportunity is identified by our direct or indirect sales force, we dedicate a team to the potential customer that becomes part of our marketing effort and will continue to service the customer throughout our relationship.

Supply Chain Management

We believe that the basis of true collaboration is seamless integration across the enterprise-wide system, encompassing the customers’ worldwide facilities, our manufacturing sites, and our suppliers. We provide our customers with a complete supply chain management solution, using advanced electronic schedule sharing methods with our customers and suppliers to efficiently plan, purchase, expedite and warehouse components and materials. The systems and processes we currently employ in supply chain management enable us to rapidly scale operations to meet customer needs, shift capacity in response to product demand fluctuations, reduce material costs and effectively distribute products to our customers or their end-customers.

6

We believe that to continue to offer our customers leading services, we must work with our customers and suppliers to create virtual enterprises, sharing information and making joint decisions to ensure a fast and cost-effective response to the market. Through a web-based user interface, our customers and suppliers have direct access to our supply chain management database and dynamic planning tools that allow “what if” analysis. Customers are able to monitor the availability and supply of component parts in real time. Communication is streamlined throughout the supply chain, allowing our customers to receive timely feedback and allowing us to receive real time input from our suppliers.

Technology, Processes and Development

We use advanced technology in the assembly and testing of the products we manufacture. We believe that our processes and skills are among the most sophisticated in the industry. Surface mount technology is the principal technology for the assembly of printed circuit boards. Our customer-focused factories include predominantly surface mount technology lines, which are highly flexible and are continually reconfigured to meet customer-specific product requirements. We also work with a wide range of substrate types from thin flexible printed circuit boards to highly complex, dense multilayer boards. In addition, our assembly capabilities are complemented by advanced test capabilities. We believe that our inspection technology is among the most sophisticated in the EMS industry. In addition to expertise in surface mount assembly, we have extensive capabilities in box and system build, customer order fulfillment, design, enclosure and cable/interconnect manufacturing.

Our Suppliers

With our web-based collaborative planning systems, our customers’ needs are integrated with our suppliers in a more efficient and cost effective manner than is achievable through traditional electronic data interchange. In 2004 we purchased approximately $175 million in materials. We believe this volume of procurement enhances our ability to obtain better pricing, influence component packaging and design and obtain supply of components in constrained markets.

We generally order materials and components under our agreements with customers only to the extent necessary to satisfy existing customer orders or forecasts. We have implemented specific inventory management strategies with certain suppliers such as supplier owned inventory and other SMTC supply chain velocity and flexibility programs. Fluctuations in material costs are typically passed through to customers. We may agree, upon request from our customers, to temporarily delay shipments, which causes a corresponding delay in our revenue recognition. Ultimately, however, our customers generally are responsible for all goods manufactured on their behalf.

During 2004, approximately 10.8% and 10.1% of our total purchases were from Scriptel and Avnet, respectively. No other supplier represented greater than 10% of our total purchases.

Competition

The EMS industry is highly fragmented and comprised of a large number of domestic and foreign companies, several of which have achieved substantial market share. The intense competition we face is provided by many independent companies as well as in-house manufacturing capabilities of current and potential customers who evaluate our capabilities against the merit of manufacturing products internally. We compete with different companies depending on the type of service or geographic area. Our competitors include Celestica Inc., Flextronics International Ltd., Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sanmina-SCI, Inc., Solectron Corporation, Benchmark Electronics Inc., Pemstar Inc. and Plexus Corp., as well as numerous other smaller EMS providers. Certain of our competitors have greater manufacturing, financial, research and development and marketing resources than SMTC. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our segments of the EMS industry are product quality, flexibility and timeliness in responding to design and schedule changes, reliability in meeting product delivery schedules, pricing, technological sophistication, the provision of value-added services and geographic locations. Failure to satisfy any of the foregoing requirements could seriously harm our business.

7

Governmental Regulation

Our operations are subject to certain federal, state, provincial and local regulatory requirements relating to environmental compliance and site cleanups, waste management and health and safety matters. In particular, we are subject to regulations pertaining to health and safety in the workplace and the use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals used in the manufacturing process.

To date, the costs of compliance and environmental remediation have not been material to us. Nevertheless, additional or modified requirements may be imposed in the future. If such additional or modified requirements are imposed on us, or if conditions requiring remediation are found to exist, we may be required to incur substantial additional expenditures.

Recent Developments

On October 4, 2004, the Company completed a reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock whereby every five shares of common stock were exchanged for one common share, resulting in 7,775,181 common shares outstanding on such date. The number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company was also reduced from 130 million to 26 million shares. The Company’s subsidiary, SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Canada, completed a reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding exchangeable shares whereby every five exchangeable shares were exchanged for one exchangeable share, resulting in 6,866,152 exchangeable shares outstanding on such date. Each exchangeable share continues to be exchangeable for one share of common stock following the reverse stock split. All share amounts and per share amounts and all information relating to stock options and warrants in this Annual Report have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split, unless otherwise stated.

Employees

As of December 31, 2004, we employed approximately 921 full time employees. In addition, we employ varying levels of temporary employees as our production demands. Given the variable nature of our project flow and the quick response time required by our customers, it is critical that we be able to quickly ramp-up and ramp-down our production to maximize efficiency. To achieve this, our strategy has been to employ a skilled temporary labor force, as required. We use outside contractors to qualify our temporary employees on a site-by-site basis. Our production level temporary employees are compensated by the hour. We believe we are team-oriented, dynamic and results-oriented with an emphasis on customer service and quality at all levels. We believe this environment is a critical factor for us to be able to fully utilize the intellectual capital of our employees. From time to time we relocate our management level employees as needed to fill open positions at our sites. Because of our training programs, we have not experienced difficulty in adequately staffing skilled employees.

As of December 31, 2004, our only unionized employees were at our Mexico facility (539 employees). We have never experienced a work stoppage or strike and believe we have sound employee relations.

8

Our Structure and Our History

The SMTC family of companies includes the following companies, with their jurisdictions of incorporation or organization in parentheses:

SMTC Corporation (Delaware)

HTM Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)

940862 Ontario Inc. (Ontario, Canada)

Qualtron, Inc. (Massachusetts)

Radio Componentes de Mexico, S.A. de S.V. (Mexico)

SMTC de Chihuahua S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)

SMTC Ireland Company (Ireland)

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of California (California)

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Canada (Ontario, Canada)

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Colorado (Delaware)

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Massachusetts (Massachusetts)

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of North Carolina (North Carolina)

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Texas (Texas)

SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Wisconsin (Wisconsin)

SMTC Mex Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)

SMTC Nova Scotia Company (Nova Scotia, Canada)

SMTC R&D Teoranta (Ireland)

SMTC Teoranta (Ireland)

Our company’s present corporate structure resulted from the July 1999 combination of Surface Mount and HTM in a transaction accounted for under the purchase method of accounting as the acquisition of Surface Mount by HTM. Subsequent to the combination, all of Surface Mount’s operating subsidiaries, other than SMTC Canada, SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Ireland Limited, SMTC Teoranta, SMTC R&D Teoranta and Qualtron, Inc., have become subsidiaries of HTM.

In August 1999, we acquired Zenith’s facility in Chihuahua, Mexico, which expanded our cost-effective manufacturing capabilities in an important geographic region. In September 1999, we acquired the Boston, Massachusetts based systems integration and precision enclosures business of W.F. Wood, which expanded our operations into the Northeastern United States. In July 2000, we acquired Appleton, Wisconsin based Pensar Corporation. In November 2000, we acquired Haverhill, Massachusetts based Qualtron, Inc. in connection with the acquisition of its parent company, Qualtron Teoranta, by SMTC Canada. In 2001, we closed our Denver, Colorado and Haverhill, Massachusetts facilities. In 2002, we closed our Cork, Ireland facility. In 2003, we closed our interconnect facility in Donegal, Ireland, our Austin, Texas facility and our Charlotte, North Carolina facility. We also sold our Appleton, Wisconsin manufacturing operations during 2003.

We have initiated the liquidation process for SMTC Ireland Company, SMTC R&D Teoranta and SMTC Teoranta. Additionally, we placed SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Ireland Limited into liquidation, and it is in the process of dissolution.

On December 14, 2004, SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Texas (“SMTC Texas”) filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 7 of title 11 of the United States Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas.

Backlog

Although we obtain firm purchase orders from our customers, our customers typically do not make firm orders for delivery of products more than 30 to 90 days in advance. We do not believe that the backlog of expected product sales covered by firm purchase orders is a meaningful measure of future sales since orders may be rescheduled or canceled.

9

Item 2:    Properties

Facilities

We conduct our operations within approximately 497,500 square feet of building space. We believe our facilities are currently adequate for our operating needs and provide capacity for future volume growth. Our principal service at all locations is assembly of electronic components, with the exception of the Boston facility where we manufacture precision enclosures and the Appleton facility where we perform design engineering services. Our operating facilities are as follows:

All of our principal facilities are ISO certified to ISO 9001 or ISO 9002 standards. ISO 9001 and ISO 9002 are commonly recognized standards in the EMS industry that are published by the International Standardization Organization and relate to quality management systems. ISO 9001 contains requirements for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and servicing. ISO 9002 contains requirements for quality assurance in production, installation and servicing.

The principal executive office of SMTC and SMTC Canada is located at 635 Hood Road, Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 4N6.

Item 3:    Legal Proceedings

We are a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business. We believe that the resolution of these legal actions will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 4:    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

10

PART II

Item 5:    Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

The Company’s common stock began trading on The Nasdaq National Market under the symbol SMTX on July 21, 2000. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low per share sales prices for the common stock as reported on Nasdaq, adjusted to take into account the one-for-five reverse stock split implemented in October 2004. On April 13, 2005, the Company’s common stock closed at $1.16 per share and had a high price of $1.25 and a low price of $1.09 on that date.

As of April 13, 2005, there were approximately 83 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

As of April 13, 2005, the Company’s capital stock consisted of 26,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of which, as of such date, 9,170,619 shares were issued and outstanding, and 5,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, of which, as of such date, one share was issued and outstanding. As of April 13, 2005, SMTC Corporation’s subsidiary, SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Canada, had 5,470,714 exchangeable shares outstanding, excluding 2,477,597 exchangeable shares owned by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, SMTC Nova Scotia Company, each of which is exchangeable for one share of common stock of SMTC Corporation. During the period from December 31, 2004 and April 13, 2005, 1,188,839 exchangeable shares were exchanged for common shares.

The Company has never declared a cash dividend on its common stock. The Board of Directors of the Company has no present intention to authorize the payment of dividends on common stock in the foreseeable future. It is the present policy of the Company to retain earnings, if any, to provide for growth and working capital needs. Further, the Company’s senior credit facility restricts the Company from paying dividends.

Item 6:    Selected Financial Data

SMTC is the result of the July 1999 combination of Surface Mount and HTM. Upon completion of the combination and concurrent recapitalization, the former stockholders of HTM held approximately 58.0% of the outstanding shares of SMTC. We accounted for the combination under the purchase method of accounting as a reverse acquisition of Surface Mount by HTM. Because HTM acquired Surface Mount for accounting purposes, HTM’s assets and liabilities are included in our consolidated financial statements at their historical cost and the comparative figures for the periods prior to the combination reflect the results of operations of HTM.

Selected Financial Data

The selected financial data includes the following:

11

On March 10, 2005 we issued a press release announcing our financial results for our fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2004, a copy of which was attached to our Form 8-K, filed on March 14, 2005. The results of operations and other financial data for 2004 differs from our press release due to additional liabilities recorded subsequent to our press release date related to the resolution and advancement of certain legal matters.

The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Our consolidated financial statements and our selected consolidated financial data have been prepared in accordance with United States GAAP. These principles conform in all material respects to Canadian GAAP except as described in note 18 to our consolidated financial statements. In 2001 the amortization and the write-down of goodwill related to the Qualtron Teoranta acquisition are $0.2 million and $2.2 million lower, respectively, under Canadian GAAP. Under United States GAAP, the shares issued as consideration in the Qualtron Teoranta acquisition were valued using the share price at the announcement date of the acquisition and under Canadian GAAP, the shares were valued on the consummation date. In 2002, the transitional goodwill impairment charge of $55.6 million is recognized in opening retained earnings under Canadian GAAP. Under United States GAAP, the cumulative adjustment is recognized in earnings during 2002. There were no Canadian GAAP differences in 2003. In 2004, Canadian GAAP requires companies to expense the fair value of stock-based compensation awarded to employees over the vesting period of the stock options. Under US GAAP, companies are required to calculate and disclose pro forma information related to fair value of stock-based compensation but they are not required to record a related compensation expense. Under Canadian GAAP, an adjustment of $0.3 million to increase the opening deficit with an offsetting adjustment to paid-in capital, and a compensation expense of $0.3 million would be recorded in 2004. The Emerging Issues Committee issued “Exchangeable Securities Issued by subsidiaries of Income Trusts”, Abstract of Issues Discussed, EIC 151 (“EIC-151”) in January 2005, which was further amended in March 2005. This pronouncement is effective for periods ending on or after June 30, 2005 and requires certain exchangeable securities to be presented as liabilities or minority interest rather than within equity. EIC-151 also addresses the measurement and conversion of exchangeable securities, and their treatment for purposes of calculating earnings per share. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new pronouncement.

12

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:

(in millions, except per share amounts)

13

Restructuring charges related to the 2001 Plan of $25.4 million and other charges of $15.2 million are included in cost of sales for fiscal year 2001. Other charges of $8.8 million are included in selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2001.

2002 Charges:

Due to the continuing economic downturn, the Company took further steps to realign its cost structure and plant capacity (the “2002 Plan”) and announced third and fourth quarter net restructuring charges of $36.9 million related to the cost of exiting equipment and facility leases, severance costs, asset impairment charges and inventory exposures, and other facility exit costs and other charges of $2.1 million.

Restructuring charges related to the 2002 Plan of $6.5 million and other charges of $0.9 million are included in cost of sales for fiscal year 2002. Other charges of $1.0 million are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and other charges of $0.2 million are included in amortization expense for fiscal year 2002.

2003 Charges:

During 2003, the Company recorded a net restructuring and other charge of $1.0 million, consisting of a net adjustment to previously recorded charges related to the 2001 Plan and the 2002 Plan of $0.3 million and additional charges incurred during 2003 of $1.3 million. During 2003, the Company also recorded an adjustment to other charges of $0.1 million, included in selling general and administrative expenses.

2004 Charges:

During 2004, the Company announced further changes to its manufacturing operations as it continued to execute its transformation plan (the “2004 Plan”) and recorded restructuring charges related to severance costs of $1.5 million. The Company also recorded adjustments to previously recorded restructuring charges related to the 2001 Plan and the 2002 Plan of $3.8 million, an additional severance charge of $0.4 million related to the 2002 Plan, and net other charges of $0.3 million.

Adjustments to previously recorded restructuring charges of $1.8 million and other net charges of $0.6 million are included in cost of sales for fiscal year 2004. An adjustment to previously recorded other charges of $0.3 million are included in selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2004.

14

In February, 2002 the main customer of the Cork, Ireland facility was placed into administration as part of a financial restructuring. As a result, on March 19, 2002, the Company announced that it was closing the Cork, Ireland facility and that it was taking steps to place the subsidiary that operated that facility in voluntary administration. Refer to note 17 to our consolidated financial statements.

15

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data and Other Financial Data:

(in millions)

Quarterly Results

On March 10, 2005 we issued a press release announcing our financial results for our fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2004, a copy of which was attached to our Form 8-K, filed on March 14, 2005. The results of operations and other financial data for 2004 differs from our press release due to additional liabilities recorded subsequent to our press release date related to the resolution and advancement of certain legal matters.

The following tables set forth our unaudited historical quarterly results for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2004. This information has been prepared on the same basis as our annual consolidated financial statements and it includes all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial results of such periods. This information should be read in conjunction with our annual consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004. The operating results for any previous quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future periods.

(in millions, except per share amounts)

16

Item 7:    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” section of this Annual Report and our consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The forward-looking statements in this discussion regarding the electronics manufacturing services industry, our expectations regarding our future performance, liquidity and capital resources and other non-historical statements in this discussion include numerous risks and uncertainties, some of which are as described in the “Factors That May Affect Future Results” section below. You should read this discussion completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We may not update these forward-looking statements after the date of this Annual Report, even though our situation will change in the future. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

Overview

We provide advanced electronics manufacturing services, or EMS, to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, primarily in the industrial, enterprise computing and networking, and communications market segments. We currently service our customers through five manufacturing and technology centers strategically located in key technology corridors in the United States, Canada and the cost-effective location of Mexico. Our full range of value-added supply chain services include product design, procurement, prototyping, advanced cable and harness interconnect, high-precision enclosures, printed circuit board assembly, test, final system build, comprehensive supply chain management, packaging, global distribution and after sales support.

As the technology sector grew rapidly in the years 1999 and 2000, we sought to take advantage of such growth and completed several acquisitions. When the technology sector declined, we found ourselves with significant excess capacity and incurred significant operating losses. As a result, in fiscal year 2001, we began an operational restructuring that is substantially complete and involved closing six and selling one of our manufacturing facilities.

In early 2004, we initiated a transformation plan designed to restructure, refinance and restore profitability and growth. The transformation plan has several components, including operational optimization, refinancing, strategy development and organization renewal.

During the third quarter of 2004, we announced changes to our manufacturing operations to provide greater focus on new customer and new product introduction and technical activities, improve capacity utilization, align our cost structure to expected revenue, and to remain profitable on a sustained basis. Our Markham, Ontario site has become the Company’s technical center of excellence, with particular emphasis on assisting current and new customers to develop, prototype and bring new products to full production. This site also will continue to manufacture low volume, high complexity printed circuit board assemblies. Our Chihuahua, Mexico facility will serve as SMTC’s primary assembly operation, offering customers high quality services in a highly efficient, cost effective site. Our operations in Franklin, Massachusetts and San Jose, California will continue to specialize in high precision metal manufacturing and system integration activities. Similarly, our engineering design services capability will continue as will our manufacturing relationship with China based Alco Electronic.

In addition, during the third quarter of 2004, we continued to streamline our overhead, selling, general and administrative structure to improve productivity and customer responsiveness and to provide greater focus on key market segments. As a result of operational and administrative changes, we recorded restructuring charges of $1.0 million during the third quarter of 2004 related to severance charges and further charges of approximately $0.9 million as we continued to execute our transformation plan in the fourth quarter of 2004.

In the first and second quarters of 2004, our priority was refinancing to strengthen our balance sheet by lowering total indebtedness, restructuring a major portion of remaining debt into longer terms and establishing a new revolving credit facility. On June 1, 2004, we completed the Recapitalization Transaction, which consisted

17

of three main components: a private placement of equity securities, a transaction with SMTC’s pre-existing lenders to repay a portion of SMTC’s pre-existing debt and restructure the balance of SMTC’s pre-existing debt and a new secured credit facility with Congress Financial Corporation and its affiliates. The following summary briefly describes the material terms of the Recapitalization Transaction.

Private Placement of Equity Securities (share amounts adjusted to reflect reverse stock split)

The private placement consisted of a committed private placement fully underwritten by a syndicate of Canadian investment dealers comprised of Orion Securities Inc., CIBC World Markets Inc., GMP Securities Limited and RBC Dominion Securities Inc. (collectively, the “Underwriters”) of 33,350,000 Special Warrants of SMTC Canada (each a “Special Warrant” and, collectively, the “Special Warrants”) to qualified investors at a price of C$1.20 (approximately US$0.90) per Special Warrant, representing an aggregate amount of issue of C$40.02 million, C$37.3 million net of underwriting expenses, or approximately US$29.9 million, US$27.6 million net of underwriting expenses, based on the exchange rate on March 3, 2004 (the “Offering”). While we completed the Offering of Special Warrants on March 3, 2004, the Special Warrants and the net proceeds from the Offering were held in escrow until June 1, 2004, until all conditions to release were satisfied. Proceeds were used for debt reduction and to fund working capital.

The Offering of Special Warrants included the following terms (as adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split):

Transaction with SMTC’s Pre-existing Lenders

The Recapitalization Transaction included a transaction with SMTC’s pre-existing lenders, (the “Pre-existing Lenders”) under which SMTC:

In addition, all warrants issued (or required to be issued) to the Pre-existing Lenders prior to the closing of the Recapitalization Transaction were cancelled.

New Secured Credit Facility

In connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, we entered into new asset-based credit facilities with Congress Financial Corporation and its affiliates (“Congress”). The Congress Credit Facility is available to the

18

Company’s U.S. and Canadian operating entities in a maximum amount of $40 million. The Congress Credit Facility includes a term loan of up to $2 million, which bears interest at the reference rate plus 1.00%, and a revolving loan that bears interest at the reference rate plus 0.50%. The reference rate is the Canadian prime rate for the loans in Canada and the U.S. prime rate for the loans in the United States. The Congress Credit Facility provides for customary fees, including a 1.00% closing fee, an unused line fee of 0.25% and a termination fee of up to 2.00%.

The Congress Credit Facility included the following terms:

The Company drew approximately $12.5 million under the Congress Credit Facility at the closing of the Recapitalization Transaction on June 1, 2004.

On November 16, 2004, the Company, together with Congress, executed a letter of understanding amending the terms of the revolving credit facility. The letter of understanding provided that, at the Company’s option, the Company could elect to use a “springing lock-box” arrangement whereby remittances from customers would be forwarded to the Company’s general bank rather than the lock-box arrangement, as previously required, where all customer remittances were swept daily to reduce the borrowings outstanding.

Should the Company elect to change to the springing lock-box arrangement, as allowed under the letter of understanding, availability under the facility may be reduced by the eligible inventory. Pursuant to the letter of understanding, the Company will be required to revert back to a required lock-box arrangement if (a) availability under the revolving credit facility is less than the greater of (i) $2.5 million or (ii) 25% of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility or (b) the occurrence of an event of default.

In March 2005, the Company and Congress signed amendments to the Congress facilities (the “March 2005 Amendments”) which formalized the November 16, 2004 letter of understanding on the terms described above and reduced the EBITDA targets for the quarters ended December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2005.

19

Management believes that no conditions have occurred that would result in subjective acceleration by the lenders, nor do they believe that any such conditions will exist over the next 12 months. Furthermore, Congress has not informed the Company that any such condition or event has occurred. Because of the option to use a springing lock-box arrangement and based on management’s assessment of the subjective acceleration clauses, the debt has been classified as long-term as at December 31, 2004.

Management does not foresee being precluded from exercising the option of converting to a springing lock-box based on its expected financing needs over the next 12 months; however, due to the effective cash management aspect of the current lock-box arrangement, the Company has no plans to move to a springing lock-box arrangement at this time.

Certain Effects of the Recapitalization Transaction

Upon the closing of the Recapitalization Transaction, SMTC’s overall indebtedness was decreased by approximately $37.5 million. As of July 4, 2004, SMTC’s aggregate indebtedness under the Credit Facilities was $43.7 million.

The following table sets forth the shares of SMTC’s common stock (including shares of common stock issuable upon exchange of outstanding exchangeable shares of our subsidiary SMTC Canada) outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the Recapitalization Transaction, after the closing of the Recapitalization Transaction and after the exercise of the warrants underlying the Special Warrants and the warrants that were issued to our Pre-existing Lenders, after giving effect to the one-for-five reverse stock split:

Corporate History

SMTC Corporation is the result of the July 1999 combination of Surface Mount and HTM. Surface Mount was established in Toronto, Ontario in 1985. HTM was established in Denver, Colorado in 1990. SMTC was established in Delaware in 1998. After the combination, we purchased Zenith Electronics’ facility in Chihuahua, Mexico, which expanded our cost-effective manufacturing capabilities in an important geographic region. In September 1999, we established a manufacturing presence in the Northeastern United States and expanded our value-added services to include high precision enclosure capabilities by acquiring Boston, Massachusetts based W.F. Wood. In July 2000, we acquired Pensar Corporation, an EMS company specializing in design engineering and headquartered in Appleton, Wisconsin. On July 27, 2000, we consummated an initial public offering of

20

1,325,000 shares of our common stock and 875,000 exchangeable shares of our subsidiary SMTC Manufacturing Corporation of Canada, or SMTC Canada. Each exchangeable share of SMTC Canada is exchangeable at the option of the holder at any time into one share of our common stock, subject to compliance with applicable securities laws. On August 18, 2000, we sold an additional 330,000 shares of common stock upon exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option. In November 2000, we acquired Qualtron Teoranta, a provider of specialized cable and harness interconnect assemblies, based in Donegal, Ireland and with a subsidiary in Haverhill, Massachusetts. In fiscal 2001, we closed our facilities in Denver, Colorado and Haverhill, Massachusetts. In fiscal 2002, we closed our facility in Cork, Ireland. In fiscal 2003, we closed our facilities in Donegal, Ireland, Austin, Texas and Charlotte, North Carolina and sold the majority of our operations in Appleton, Wisconsin.

Results of Operations

Our contractual arrangements with our key customers generally provide a framework for our overall relationship with our customers. Revenue from the sale of products is recognized when goods are shipped to customers since title has passed to the customer, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, performance has occurred, all customer-specified test criteria have been met and the earnings process is complete. The Company also derives revenue from engineering and design services. Service revenue is recognized as services are performed. Actual production volumes are based on purchase orders for the delivery of products. Typically, these orders do not commit to firm production schedules for more than 30 to 90 days in advance. To minimize inventory risk, generally we order materials and components only to the extent necessary to satisfy existing customer forecasts or purchase orders. Fluctuations in material costs typically are passed through to customers. We may agree, upon request from our customers, to temporarily delay shipments, which causes a corresponding delay in our revenue recognition.

Our fiscal year end is December 31. The consolidated financial statements of SMTC, including the consolidated financial statements of HTM for periods prior to the combination, are prepared in accordance with United States GAAP, which conforms in all material respects to Canadian GAAP, except as disclosed in note 18 to the consolidated financial statements. In 2002, the transitional goodwill impairment charge of $55.6 million was recognized in opening retained earnings under Canadian GAAP. Under United States GAAP, the cumulative adjustment was recognized in earnings during 2002. There are no Canadian GAAP differences in 2003. In 2004, Canadian GAAP requires companies to expense the fair value of stock-based compensation awarded to employees over the vesting period of the stock options. Under US GAAP, companies are required to calculate and disclose pro forma information related to fair value of stock-based compensation but they are not required to record a related compensation expense. Under Canadian GAAP, a compensation expense of $0.3 million would be recorded as an expense.

21

The following table sets forth certain operating data expressed as a percentage of revenue for the years ended:

Year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003

Revenue

Revenue decreased $61.5 million, or 20.1%, from $306.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 to $244.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The decline in revenue resulted from lower production volume from IBM, Alcatel and Square D due to lower demand and certain programs nearing completion, resulting in approximately $44.6 million, $21.7 million and $9.4 million, respectively, in lower revenue from these customers during fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003. The reduction in revenue from IBM, Alcatel and Square D was partially offset by increases in revenue from other top ten customers.

During 2004 the Company continued its focus on the industrial sector to achieve greater diversification and less concentration with top ten customers, resulting in a change to the product mix from 2003. The industrial sector represented 56.5% of total sales for fiscal year 2004, compared to 45.4% for fiscal year 2003. The percentage of sales to both the enterprise computing and networking and the communications sectors declined to 30.5% and 13.0%, respectively, during 2004 from 37.6% and 17.0%, respectively, for 2003.

During fiscal year 2004, we recorded approximately $9.1 million of sales of raw materials inventory to customers, which carried no margin, compared to $10.0 million in fiscal year 2003. The Company purchases raw materials based on customer purchase orders. To the extent the customer requires these orders to be altered or changed, the customer is generally obligated to purchase the original on-order raw material.

22

Due to changes in market conditions, the life cycle of products, the nature of specific programs and other factors, customer volumes produced by the Company typically vary from year to year. For fiscal year 2004, the Company’s ten largest customers represented approximately 84% of revenue. Revenue from our three largest customers was $41.0 million from IBM, $38.7 million from Ingenico and $24.9 million from Mars Electronics representing 16.8%, 15.8% and 10.2%, respectively, of total revenue for 2004. This compares with revenue from IBM of $80.9 million, Ingenico of $44.6 million and Square D of $32.0 million for fiscal year 2003, representing 26.4%, 14.6% and 10.5%, respectively, of total revenue for the period. No other customers represented more than 10% of revenue in either period.

During fiscal year 2004, 54.1% of our revenue was produced from operations in Mexico, 29.4% from the United States and 16.5% from Canada. During fiscal year 2003, 48.1% of our revenue was produced from operations in Mexico, 28.0% from the United States, 23.1% from Canada, and 0.8% from Europe. The increase in production in Mexico is the result of our restructuring initiatives, where we closed a number of facilities in the US and moved the production to Mexico. In 2004 we also announced that our Canadian facility would become our technical center of excellence, specializing in new product introduction, and we transferred further production to Mexico. We terminated manufacturing in Europe during the second quarter of 2003.

The Company operates in a highly competitive and dynamic marketplace in which current and prospective customers from time to time seek to lower their costs through a competitive tendering process among EMS providers. This process creates an opportunity to increase revenue to the extent we are successful in the tender process, however there is also the potential for revenue decline to the extent we are unsuccessful in this process. Furthermore, even if we are successful, there is potential for our margins to decline. If we lose any of our larger product lines manufactured for one of our customers, we could experience further declines in revenue.

Gross Profit

Gross profit decreased $3.6 million from $26.6 million, or 8.7% of revenue, for fiscal year 2003 to $23.0 million, or 9.4% of revenue, for fiscal year 2004. Gross profit for fiscal year 2004 includes the recovery of a previously recorded restructuring charge related to the proceeds of $1.8 million received from the settlement of a legal claim for obsolete inventory previously written off. Gross profit for 2004 also includes an other charge of $1.0 million related to a provision against inventory caused by an unanticipated volume decline from a major customer that operates in a cyclical sector and the recovery of a previously recorded other charge of $0.4 million.

Excluding the settlement of the obsolete inventory claim and the net other charges, gross profit was $21.8 million, or 8.9% of revenue, compared to $26.6 million, or 8.7% of revenue, for the same period last year. The reduction in gross profit dollars, excluding the settlement of the obsolete inventory claim and net other charges, is largely the result of the lower revenue base. The improvement in the gross margin percentage, excluding the proceeds of the obsolete inventory claim and net other charges, is largely due to improved utilization of fixed factory overhead costs, improved customer mix, partially offset by the negative impact of recent foreign exchange fluctuations.

The Company writes down estimated obsolete or excess inventory for the difference between the cost of inventory and estimated realizable value based upon customer forecasts, shrinkage, the aging and future demand of the inventory, past experience with specific customers and the ability to sell back inventory to customers or suppliers. If these estimates change, additional write-downs may be required.

Selling, General & Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.8 million from $18.8 million for fiscal year 2003 to $16.0 million for fiscal year 2004. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2004 include an adjustment of $0.3 million related to proceeds received on the sale of an asset previously written off, offset by a provision for the settlement of a Mexican labor dispute of $0.3 million. The decrease of $2.8 million from $18.8 million, or 6.1% of revenue, for fiscal year 2003, to $16.0 million, or 6.5% of revenue, for fiscal year 2004 is

23

a result of corporate-wide cost containment measures, partially offset by an investment in sales resources. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue is due to the lower revenue base.

The Company determines the allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated credit losses based on the length of time the receivables have been outstanding, customer and industry concentrations, the current business environment and historical experience.

Amortization

Amortization of intangible assets of $2.3 million for fiscal year 2004 and $4.1 million for fiscal year 2003 is in connection with the amortization of deferred finance costs related to the establishment of our senior credit facility in July 2000 and subsequent amendments thereto.

The deferred finance costs related to the Recapitalization Transaction that closed on June 1, 2004 are recorded as interest expense for the third and fourth quarters of 2004.

Restructuring and Other Charges

During 2001 and 2002 the Company announced restructuring programs aimed at reducing its cost structure and plant capacity (the “2001 Plan” and the “2002 Plan”, respectively) and recorded restructuring and other charges consisting of a write-down of goodwill and other intangible assets, the costs of exiting equipment and facility leases, severance costs, asset impairment charges, inventory exposures and other facility exit costs.

During the third quarter of 2004, the Company announced further changes to its manufacturing operations as it continues to execute its transformation plan ( the “2004 Plan”). This plan seeks to provide greater focus on new customer and new product introduction and technical activities, to improve capacity utilization and to align its cost structure to expected revenue. During fiscal years 2003 and 2004 the Company recorded various adjustments to the 2001 Plan and the 2002 Plan and additional charges related to the 2004 Plan.

The following table details the components of the restructuring charge and other charges for fiscal years 2003 and 2004:

(in millions)

24

2003 restructuring and other charges:

During 2003, the Company recorded a net restructuring and other charge of $1.0 million, consisting of a net adjustment to previously recorded charges related to the 2001 Plan and the 2002 Plan of $0.3 million and additional charges incurred during 2003 of $1.3 million. During 2003, the Company also recorded an adjustment to other charges of $0.1 million.

(a) Restructuring and other charges:

During 2003, the Company recorded an additional charge for lease and other contract obligations of $2.5 million, consisting of a charge related to the 2001 Plan of $2.2 million due to a revision in the estimate of sub-lease recoveries associated with the facility lease in Monterrey, Mexico, and a charge related to the 2002 Plan of $0.3 million primarily associated with the idling of equipment leases at the Donegal facility. During 2003, the Company also recorded a reduction to lease and other contract obligations related to the 2002 Plan of $4.1 million for the expected or actual settlement of the amounts, including the Austin facility lease, for less than the originally estimated amounts.

Severance costs of $2.4 million recorded during 2003 related to the additional severance for the closure or resizing of facilities pursuant to the 2002 Plan and the change in senior management during the year. Included in the severance costs was $0.8 million related to the termination of 75 plant and operational employees at the Charlotte facility, $0.3 million for the termination of 47 employees at the Austin facility, and $0.3 million for the termination of 42 employees at the Mexico facility.

Other facility exit costs of $0.1 million recorded during 2003 largely relate to additional costs incurred associated with the closure of the Charlotte facility. The Company also recorded an adjustment to other facility exit costs of $0.9 million during 2003, consisting of $0.2 million related to the 2001 Plan due to the settlement of certain obligations for less than the original estimated amounts, and $0.7 million related to the 2002 Plan. The $0.7 million relates to the Company revising its original estimates associated with the costs of closing the Austin and Charlotte facilities, based on the settlement of certain liabilities for less than the originally estimated amounts and the effects of ongoing negotiations for the settlement of other liabilities.

During 2003, the Company recorded a gain of $0.3 million related to the disposal of assets previously written down at the Donegal facility.

Other charges recorded during 2003 of $1.3 million relate to professional fees associated with the Company’s refinancing negotiations with current and potential lenders and investors of $0.9 million and a discount on the prepayment of stockholder loans of $0.4 million. All amounts related to the 2003 other charges were paid during 2003.

Approximately $2.9 million of the restructuring charges associated with lease and other contract obligations related to the 2001 Plan and $7.6 million associated with lease and other contract obligations, severance and other facility exit costs related to the 2002 Plan remained unpaid at December 31, 2003. We expect the majority of the remaining restructuring accrual related to severance charges and equipment lease obligations to be paid by the end of fiscal year 2005. We are attempting to negotiate a settlement of the remaining facility lease obligations.

(b) Other charges:

During 2003, the Company recorded an adjustment of $0.1 million in selling, general and administrative expenses related to the recovery of assets written off in 2002.

25

2004 restructuring and other charges:

During 2004, the Company recorded a net recovery of restructuring and other charges of $2.3 million, consisting of proceeds from the settlement of a legal claim of $1.8 million, net adjustments to previously recorded lease and other contract obligations related to the 2001 Plan and the 2002 Plan of $2.0 million and severance charges of $1.5 million. The Company also recorded other net charges of $0.6 million related to inventory adjustments and proceeds of $0.3 million from the sale of an asset previously written off.

(a) Restructuring charges:

During 2004, the Company settled a claim in its favor for net proceeds of $1.8 million, related to a four year dispute over obsolete inventory with a former customer. The Company recorded the proceeds from the settlement in cost of sales.

Adjustments to previously recorded lease and other contract obligations associated with the 2001 Plan are in connection with the settlement a legal suit related to the facility lease in Monterrey, Mexico which resulted in the recovery of $1.7 million to adjust the provision to the amount of the settlement. Adjustments to previously recorded lease and other contract obligations associated with the 2002 Plan of $0.3 million are in connection with the settlement of various equipment leases for less than originally estimated. The Company recorded additional severance charges of $0.4 million in connection with the 2002 Plan as a result of a change in estimate of amounts to be paid out. This additional severance is expected to be paid during fiscal 2005.

Severance charges related to the 2004 Plan of $1.5 million relate to 99 and 110 employees at the Chihuahua, Mexico and Markham, Ontario facilities, respectively.

The benefits of the 2004 Plan affected cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses in 2004. The Company expects to experience further benefits in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2005.

The following table details the related amounts included in accrued liabilities at December 31, 2004 relating to the 2001 Plan:

(in millions)

The following table discloses the restructuring amounts included in accrued liabilities by segment relating to the 2001 Plan:

(in millions)

26

The following table details the related amounts included in accrued liabilities as at December 31, 2004 relating to the 2002 Plan:

(in millions)

The following table discloses the restructuring amounts included in accrued liabilities by segment relating to the 2002 Plan:

(in millions)

We expect the outstanding severance amounts will be paid out during 2005 by drawing on our revolving credit facility. We are in a legal dispute for the remaining lease and other contractual obligations outstanding.

The following table details the related amounts included in accrued liabilities as at December 31, 2004 relating to the 2004 Plan:

(in millions)

We expect the majority of the remaining restructuring accrual related to the 2004 Plan be paid by the end of fiscal year 2005 by drawing on our revolving credit facility.

(b) Other charges (recoveries):

Other charges included in cost of sales include a charge of $1.0 million related to a provision against inventory caused by an unanticipated volume decline from a major customer that operates in a cyclical sector and the recovery of a previously recorded other charge of $0.4 million.

Other charges included in selling, general and administrative expenses are in connection with proceeds of $0.3 million from the sale of an asset previously written off.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $0.6 million from $5.1 million for fiscal year 2003 to $4.5 million for fiscal year 2004. Interest expense for the fiscal year 2004 includes the amortization of deferred financing fees of $0.5 million offset by a reduction in interest expense of $0.2 million related to the amortization of the value of the

27

cancelled warrants. Excluding the amortization of deferred financing fees and the reduction in interest expense related to the amortization of the value of the cancelled warrants, interest expense decreased $0.9 million from $5.1 million to $4.2 million due to lower average debt balances outstanding during fiscal year 2004. The weighted average interest rates with respect to the debt for the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004 were 6.6% and 7.4%, respectively.

Income Tax Expense

The net tax expense for fiscal year 2004 of $0.5 million includes $0.5 million related to minimum tax on an intercompany dividend, $0.1 million related to taxes in certain jurisdictions offset by a deferred tax asset associated with the Mexican jurisdiction.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, change of control limitations, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, states that forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative evidence, such as cumulative losses in recent years in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets relate. As a result of the quarterly review undertaken at the end of the second quarter of 2003, the Company concluded that given the weakness and uncertainty in the economic environment at that time, it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets arising from its operations in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets relate. In 2004, it was determined by management that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets associated with the Mexican jurisdiction would be realized in the amount of $0.1 million. The U.S. and Canadian jurisdictions continued to have a full valuation allowance established for the deferred tax asset. In addition, the Company expects to continue to provide a full valuation allowance for the assets relating to the U.S and Canadian jurisdictions until it can demonstrate a sustained level of profitability that establishes its ability to utilize the assets in the jurisdictions to which the assets relate.

At December 31, 2004, the Company had total net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $105.2 million (2003 — $142.4 million), of which $2.4 million will expire in 2010, $6.7 million will expire in 2011, $1.3 million will expire in 2012, $1.1 million will expire in 2018, $0.1 million will expire in 2019 and 2020, $54.1 million will expire in 2021, $20.1 million will expire in 2022, and $19.4 million will expire in 2023. During the quarter ended July 4, 2004, the Company incurred tax on an intercompany dividend payment, of which approximately $9.1 million was offset against tax loss carryforwards. This had the effect of reducing the deferred tax asset and related valuation allowance by the same amount. The Company recorded a tax expense of $0.5 million related to minimum tax on this dividend.

Whether or not the Recapitalization Transaction results in an ownership change for purposes of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 382”), which imposes a limitation on a corporation’s use of net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards following an “ownership change,” depends upon whether the exchangeable shares of SMTC Canada are treated as shares of the Company under U.S. tax principles. The tax law governing the exchangeable shares is unclear. Accordingly, it is uncertain whether Section 382 will apply to the Recapitalization Transaction. If deemed applicable, Section 382 would limit the amount of NOLs available to offset taxable income in the post ownership change period and would preclude the full utilization of the Company’s NOLs. However, the Company would file the appropriate tax election to ensure that the taxable intercompany dividend referred to above would be allocated to the pre-ownership change period in the year ended December 31, 2004, and thus the utilization of NOLs against this income amount would not be limited.

Taxes related to income from discontinued operations were offset against tax loss carryforwards.

28

Discontinued Operations

(a) Appleton

During the third quarter of 2003, the Company sold the manufacturing operations of the Appleton facility for cash proceeds of $3.1 million. The Appleton facility has historically been included in the results of the United States segment. The Company recorded a restructuring charge of $3.2 million in the second quarter of 2003 reflecting the write-down of the assets to the estimated realizable value and a loss on disposal of discontinued operation of $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2003, which has been included in the loss from discontinued operations. Details of the net assets disposed of are as follows:

(in millions)

The following information included in discontinued operations relates to the sale of the Appleton manufacturing operations:

(in millions)

Included in the earnings (loss) from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2003 is the loss on disposition of discontinued operations of $0.2 million, a restructuring charge of $3.2 million reflecting the write-down of the Appleton assets to the estimated realizable value and the loss from operations of $0.5 million.

Included in the earnings (loss) from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2004 are proceeds from the settlement of a lawsuit of $0.2 million and an adjustment to the remaining accrual for closing costs of $0.2 million.

(b) Cork

In February 2002, the main customer of the Cork, Ireland facility was placed into administration as part of a financial restructuring. As a result, on March 19, 2002, the Company announced that it was closing the Cork, Ireland facility and that it was taking steps to place the subsidiary that operated that facility in voluntary administration. The following information relates to the Cork discontinued operations:

(in millions)

29

The earnings from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2003 include the distribution from the proceeds of the liquidation of $2.3 million less additional charges of $0.7 million related to the wind-down of the facility and related operations.

The earnings from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2004 include a further distribution from the proceeds of the liquidation of $0.4 million.

Year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002

Revenue

Revenue decreased $219.1 million, or 41.7%, from $525.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to $306.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in revenue primarily is due to the effect of the continued decline experienced in the technology market, coupled with our decision to terminate our supply agreement with Dell during 2002 and a reduction in revenue from many of our larger customers. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company informed Dell of its intention to terminate its supply agreement and to end production over the third quarter of 2002. The Company’s decision was taken after a review of the Company’s return on capital requirements indicated that the customer’s programs were not generating sufficient returns for the disproportionate amount of working capital utilized. While the decision to terminate the Company’s supply agreement with Dell lowered the Company’s 2003 revenue, the reduction in revenue was offset by reduced expenses and reduced working capital requirements. In 2003, SMTC’s focus on the industrial sector resulted in a substantial change to the product mix over 2002. The industrial sector represented 45% of total sales in 2003, compared to 22% in 2002. The proportion of sales to both the enterprise computing and networking and the communications sectors declined to 38% and 17% respectively in 2003 from 53% and 25% respectively in 2002.

During 2003 we recorded approximately $10.0 million of sales of raw materials inventory to customers, which carried no margin, compared to $30.9 million for the same period in 2002.

Revenue from IBM of $80.9 million, Ingenico of $44.6 million and Square D of $32.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 was 26.4%, 14.6% and 10.5%, respectively, of total revenue for the period. Revenue from IBM of $121.6 million, Dell of $87.7 million and Alcatel of $69.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 was 23.2%, 16.7% and 13.2%, respectively, of total revenue for the period. No other customers represented more than 10% of revenue in either period.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, 48.1% of our revenue was produced from operations in Mexico, 28.0% from the United States, 23.1% from Canada, and 0.8% from Europe. For the year ended December 31, 2002, 48.9% of our revenue produced from operations in the United States, 34.4% from Mexico, 15.8% from Canada and 0.9% from Europe.

Gross Profit

Gross profit increased $6.3 million from $20.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to $26.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Fiscal year 2002 gross profit includes the effect of restructuring charges of $6.5 million related to an additional write-down of inventory in connection with the closure of our Denver facility and other inventory related charges of $0.9 million resulting from the costs associated with the disengagement of Dell, coupled with the effects of the continued downturn in the technology sector.

Gross profit, excluding restructuring and other charges, decreased $1.1 million from $27.7 million, or 5.3% of revenue for fiscal year 2002, to $26.6 million, or 8.7% of revenue for fiscal year 2003. The decline in absolute dollar gross profit, excluding restructuring and other charges, is due to the effect of the lower revenue in 2003, which was largely offset by cost savings due to capacity reductions that were significantly completed by the second quarter of 2003 and an improvement in customer mix as the Company continues to diversify its customer base. Gross margins improved as a result of a higher concentration of sales to the industrial sector relative to both

30

the enterprise computing and networking and the communications sectors. Margins in the industrial sector are typically higher due to a greater degree of product customization and smaller, more diversified lot sizes. Gross profit was adversely affected by increased costs to meet customers’ orders due to our credit related constraints. Specifically, credit constraints arose from our burdensome debt position, resulting in additional freight and material costs and labor inefficiencies that lowered our margins in the fourth quarter of 2003.

The Company writes down estimated obsolete or excess inventory for the difference between the cost of inventory and estimated realizable value based upon customer forecasts, shrinkage, the aging and future demand of the inventory, past experience with specific customers and the ability to sell back inventory to customers or suppliers. If these estimates change, additional write-downs may be required.

Selling, General & Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $5.4 million from $24.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to $18.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2002 include $1.0 million related to a write-down of certain assets. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2003 include an adjustment to previously recorded other charges of $0.1 million. Excluding the charges and adjustment noted above, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $4.3 million from $23.2 million, or 4.4% of revenue for fiscal year 2002, to $18.9 million, or 6.2% of revenue for fiscal year 2003 due to the closure of our Donegal, Austin and Charlotte facilities and to our continued focus on reducing selling, general and administrative expenses at each operating site. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue is a result of lower revenue.

The Company determines the allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated credit losses based on the length of time the receivables have been outstanding, customer and industry concentrations, the current business environment and historical experience.

Amortization

Amortization of intangible assets of $4.1 million for fiscal year 2003 include the amortization of deferred finance costs related to the establishment of our senior credit facility in July 2000 and subsequent amendments thereto.

Amortization of intangible assets of $2.5 million for fiscal year 2002 included the amortization of $2.2 million (including other charges of $0.2 million) of deferred finance costs related to the establishment of our senior credit facility in July 2000 and subsequent amendments, and $0.3 million of deferred equipment lease costs.

The costs associated with our amended and restated senior credit facility are being amortized over the remaining term of the debt.

31

Restructuring and Other Charges

The following table details the components of the restructuring charge and other charges:

(in millions)

2002 restructuring and other charges:

Due to the continuing economic downturn, the Company took steps to realign its cost structure and plant capacity (the “2002 Plan”) and announced third and fourth quarter net restructuring charges of $36.9 million related to the cost of exiting equipment and facility leases, severance costs asset impairment charges, inventory exposures and other facility exit costs and other charges of $2.1 million primarily related to the costs associated with the disengagement of a customer and the continued downturn.

(a) Restructuring charges:

The write-down of inventory of $6.5 million represents further costs associated with the closure of the assembly facility in Denver and costs associated with the closure of the interconnect facility in Donegal, Ireland.

Lease and other contract obligations of $18.7 million represent the costs associated with exiting equipment leases and exiting facility leases in Austin and Donegal, Ireland.

Severance costs of $2.8 million are associated with the closure of the interconnect facility in Donegal, Ireland and the resizing of various other locations. The severance costs related to 481 plant and operational employees, primarily at the Mexico and Donegal, Ireland facilities.

Other facility exit costs of $1.6 million include other costs associated with the decommissioning and closure of the Austin and Donegal, Ireland facilities.

32

Asset impairment charges of $7.7 million reflect the write-down of certain long-lived and other assets, primarily at the Austin location, that became impaired as a result of the rationalization of facilities. The asset impairment was identified by comparing book value on undiscounted projected future net cash flows relating to the assets, resulting in a write-down to estimated salvage values.

During 2002, the Company recorded an adjustment to lease and other contract obligation costs recorded as part of the 2001 Plan of $0.4 million upon negotiating a final settlement on a facility lease for amounts less than originally estimated.

(b) Other charges:

Other charges included in cost of sales of $0.9 million relate to inventory charges resulting from the disengagement with a customer, coupled with the effect of the continued downturn in the technology sector. Other charges of $1.0 million included in selling, general and administrative expenses relate to the write-off of certain assets. Other charges of $0.2 million included in amortization expense relate to additional amortization recorded to reflect the December 2002 amendment to our credit facility.

The restructuring charges are based on certain estimates and assumptions using the best available information at the time and are subject to change.

2003 restructuring and other charges:

During 2003, the Company recorded a net restructuring and other charge of $1.0 million, consisting of a net adjustment to previously recorded charges related to the 2001 Plan and the 2002 Plan of $0.3 million and additional charges incurred during 2003 of $1.3 million. During 2003, the Company also recorded an adjustment to other charges of $0.1 million.

(a) Restructuring and other charges:

During 2003, the Company recorded an additional charge for lease and other contract obligations of $2.5 million, consisting of a charge related to the 2001 Plan of $2.2 million due to a revision in the estimate of sub-lease recoveries associated with the facility lease in Monterrey, Mexico, and a charge related to the 2002 Plan of $0.3 million primarily associated with the idling of equipment leases at the Donegal facility. During 2003, the Company also recorded a reduction to lease and other contract obligations related to the 2002 Plan of $4.1 million for the expected or actual settlement of the amounts, including the Austin facility lease, for less than the originally estimated amounts.

Severance costs of $2.4 million recorded during 2003 related to the additional severance for the closure or resizing of facilities pursuant to the 2002 Plan and the change in senior management during the year. Included in the severance costs was $0.8 million related to the termination of 75 plant and operational employees at the Charlotte facility, $0.3 million for the termination of 47 employees at the Austin facility, and $0.3 million for the termination of 42 employees at the Mexico facility.

Other facility exit costs of $0.1 million recorded during 2003 largely relate to additional costs incurred associated with the closure of the Charlotte facility. The Company also recorded an adjustment to other facility exit costs of $0.9 million during 2003, consisting of $0.2 million related to the 2001 Plan due to the settlement of certain obligations for less than the original estimated amounts, and $0.7 million related to the 2002 Plan. The $0.7 million relates to the Company revising its original estimates associated with the costs of closing the Austin and Charlotte facilities, based on the settlement of certain liabilities for less than the originally estimated amounts and the effects of ongoing negotiations for the settlement of other liabilities.

During 2003, the Company recorded a gain of $0.3 million related to the disposal of assets previously written down at the Donegal facility.

33

Other charges recorded during 2003 of $1.3 million relate to professional fees associated with the Company’s refinancing negotiations with current and potential lenders and investors of $0.9 million and a discount on the prepayment of stockholder loans of $0.4 million. All amounts related to the 2003 other charges were paid during 2003.

Approximately $2.9 million of the restructuring charges associated with lease and other contract obligations related to the 2001 Plan and $7.6 million associated with lease and other contract obligations, severance and other facility exit costs related to the 2002 Plan remained unpaid at December 31, 2003. We expect the majority of the remaining restructuring accrual related to severance charges and equipment lease obligations to be paid by the end of fiscal year 2005. We are attempting to negotiate a settlement of the remaining facility lease obligations.

(b) Other charges:

During 2003, the Company recorded an adjustment of $0.1 million in selling, general and administrative expenses related to the recovery of assets written off in 2002.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $3.2 million from $8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 due to lower average debt outstanding during 2003 combined with lower interest rates. The weighted average interest rates with respect to the debt for the years ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003 were 7.2% and 6.6%, respectively.

Income Tax Expense

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, change of control limitations, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, states that forming a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative evidence, such as cumulative losses in recent years in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets relate. As a result of the quarterly review undertaken at the end of the second quarter of 2003, the Company concluded that given the weakness and uncertainty in the current economic environment, it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets arising from its operations in the jurisdictions to which the deferred tax assets relate. As a result, the total valuation allowance for deferred tax assets in all jurisdictions worldwide increased from approximately $34.5 million at December 31, 2002 to approximately $68.4 million at December 31, 2003. In addition, the Company expects to provide a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits until it can demonstrate a sustained level of profitability that establishes its ability to utilize the assets in the jurisdictions to which the assets relate.

At December 31, 2003, the Company had total net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $142.4 million, of which $4.2 million will expire in 2010, $0.3 million will expire in 2011, $1.3 million will expire in 2012, $1.6 million will expire in 2018, $81.2 million will expire in 2021, $20.2 million will expire in 2022 and $33.6 million will expire in 2023. The Recapitalization Transaction may limit our ability to utilize a significant portion of our tax losses in the future.

For the year ended December 31, 2002 an income tax recovery of $1.2 million was recorded on a pre-tax loss before discontinued operations and the cumulative effect of a change in accounting policy of $45.1 million resulting in an effective tax recovery rate of 2.7%, as losses in certain jurisdictions were not tax effected due to the uncertainty of our ability to utilize such losses.

34

Discontinued Operations

(a) Appleton

During the third quarter of 2003, the Company sold the manufacturing operations of the Appleton facility for cash proceeds of $3.1 million. The Company recorded a loss on disposal of $0.2 million, which has been included in the loss from discontinued operations. Details of the net assets disposed of are as follows:

(in millions)

The following information included in discontinued operations relates to the sale of the Appleton manufacturing operations:

(in millions)

Included in the loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2003 is the loss on disposition of discontinued operation of $0.2 million, a restructuring charge of $3.2 million recorded during the second quarter of 2003, reflecting the write-down of the Appleton assets to the estimated realizable value and loss from operations of $0.5 million. The loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 includes restructuring charges of $0.1 million.

(b) Cork

In February, 2002 the main customer of our Cork, Ireland facility was placed into administration as part of a financial restructuring. As a result, on March 19, 2002, we announced that we were closing our Cork, Ireland facility and that we were taking steps to place the subsidiary that operated that facility in voluntary administration. During the first quarter of 2002, we recorded a charge of $9.7 million related to the closure of the facility.

The following information relates to the Cork discontinued operations:

(in millions)