Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2005

 

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             

 

Commission file number 001-16583

 


 

ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Delaware   58-2632672

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2400, Atlanta, Georgia   30309
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

 

(404) 853-1400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

None

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

 


 

Indicate by check mark x whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark x whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

 

Common Stock - $0.01 Par Value – 44,128,839 shares as of March 29, 2005.

 



Table of Contents

ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

 

INDEX

 

     Page No.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

   3

ITEM 1.

  

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   3
     CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) – FEBRUARY 28, 2005 AND AUGUST 31, 2004    3
     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) – THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2005 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2004    4
     CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) – SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2005 AND FEBRUARY 29, 2004    5
     NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)    6

ITEM 2.

   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS    15

ITEM 3.

   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK    20

ITEM 4.

  

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

   20

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

   21

ITEM 1.

   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS    21

ITEM 4.

   SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS    21

ITEM 6.

   EXHIBITS    21

SIGNATURES

   22

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

 

ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per-share data)

 

     FEBRUARY 28,
2005


   

AUGUST 31,

2004


 
     (Unaudited)        

ASSETS

                

Current Assets:

                

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 9,514     $ 14,135  

Receivables, less reserve for doubtful accounts of $9,021 at February 28, 2005 and $8,285 at August 31, 2004

     311,128       331,157  

Inventories

     217,393       222,260  

Deferred income taxes

     38,062       29,500  

Prepayments and other current assets

     43,777       36,534  
    


 


Total Current Assets

     619,874       633,586  
    


 


Property, Plant, and Equipment, at cost:

                

Land

     12,146       13,037  

Buildings and leasehold improvements

     166,836       167,707  

Machinery and equipment

     378,152       375,750  
    


 


Total Property, Plant, and Equipment

     557,134       556,494  

Less - Accumulated depreciation and amortization

     333,319       330,195  
    


 


Property, Plant, and Equipment, net

     223,815       226,299  
    


 


Other Assets:

                

Goodwill

     345,363       343,595  

Intangible assets

     125,065       126,658  

Other long-term assets

     28,845       34,391  
    


 


Total Other Assets

     499,273       504,644  
    


 


Total Assets

   $ 1,342,962     $ 1,364,529  
    


 


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                

Current Liabilities:

                

Current maturities of long-term debt

   $ 614     $ 1,511  

Short-term secured borrowings

     10,000       —    

Revolving credit facility

     4,300       4,000  

Term loan

     18,360       —    

Accounts payable

     170,541       206,064  

Accrued salaries, commissions, and bonuses

     32,648       45,335  

Accrued severance and related charges

     16,055       —    

Other accrued liabilities

     94,000       105,325  
    


 


Total Current Liabilities

     346,518       362,235  
    


 


Long-Term Debt, less current maturities

     372,083       390,210  
    


 


Deferred Income Taxes

     24,947       24,844  
    


 


Self-Insurance Reserves, less current portion

     17,967       17,484  
    


 


Other Long-Term Liabilities

     89,230       91,779  
    


 


Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 10)

                

Stockholders’ Equity:

                

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued

     —         —    

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 43,636,231 and 42,596,015 shares issued and outstanding at February 28, 2005 and August 31, 2004

     436       426  

Paid-in capital

     447,714       425,807  

Retained earnings

     78,274       86,560  

Unearned compensation on restricted stock

     (11,062 )     (5,609 )

Accumulated other comprehensive loss items

     (23,145 )     (29,207 )
    


 


Total Stockholders’ Equity

     492,217       477,977  
    


 


Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

   $ 1,342,962     $ 1,364,529  
    


 


 

The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per-share data)

 

     THREE MONTHS ENDED

    SIX MONTHS ENDED

 
     FEBRUARY 28,
2005


    FEBRUARY 29,
2004


    FEBRUARY 28,
2005


    FEBRUARY 29,
2004


 

Net Sales

   $ 505,121     $ 491,039     $ 1,030,323     $ 1,008,577  

Cost of Products Sold

     309,915       289,591       616,338       592,422  
    


 


 


 


Gross Profit

     195,206       201,448       413,985       416,155  

Selling, Distribution, and Administrative Expenses

     180,630       175,266       368,458       359,982  

Special Charge

     17,000       —         17,000       —    

Impairment Charge

     —         —         —         579  

Stock Compensation Expense

     2,073       1,802       4,809       3,195  
    


 


 


 


Operating (Loss) Profit

     (4,497 )     24,380       23,718       52,399  

Other Expense (Income):

                                

Interest expense, net

     9,084       8,927       18,028       17,644  

Gain on sale of businesses

     —         (105 )     (538 )     (827 )

Miscellaneous (income) expense, net

     (525 )     684       (1,001 )     525  
    


 


 


 


Total Other Expense

     8,559       9,506       16,489       17,342  
    


 


 


 


(Loss) Income before Provision for Income Taxes

     (13,056 )     14,874       7,229       35,057  

(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes

     (4,619 )     5,355       2,501       12,621  
    


 


 


 


Net (Loss) Income

   $ (8,437 )   $ 9,519     $ 4,728     $ 22,436  
    


 


 


 


Earnings Per Share:

                                

Basic (Loss) Earnings per Share

   $ (0.20 )   $ 0.23     $ 0.11     $ 0.54  
    


 


 


 


Basic Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding

     42,926       41,846       42,683       41,721  
    


 


 


 


Diluted (Loss) Earnings per Share

   $ (0.20 )   $ 0.22     $ 0.11     $ 0.52  
    


 


 


 


Diluted Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding

     42,926       43,291       44,244       42,999  
    


 


 


 


Dividends Declared per Share

   $ 0.15     $ 0.15     $ 0.30     $ 0.30  
    


 


 


 


 

The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

     SIX MONTHS ENDED

 
     FEBRUARY 28,
2005


    FEBRUARY 29,
2004


 

Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities:

                

Net income

   $ 4,728     $ 22,436  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:

                

Depreciation and amortization

     20,585       22,936  

(Gain) loss on the sale of property, plant, and equipment

     (191 )     97  

Gain on sale of businesses

     (538 )     (827 )

Provision for losses on accounts receivable

     2,761       1,599  

Other non-cash charges

     2,586       2,311  

Change in assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions and divestitures-

                

Receivables

     19,777       5,167  

Inventories

     4,867       (13,418 )

Deferred income taxes

     12       (3,694 )

Prepayments and other current assets

     (7,242 )     (916 )

Accounts payable

     (37,410 )     (6,409 )

Other current liabilities

     (13,484 )     (17,833 )

Other

     10,377       12,246  
    


 


Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

     6,828       23,695  
    


 


Cash Provided by (Used for) Investing Activities:

                

Purchases of property, plant, and equipment

     (18,800 )     (20,460 )

Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment

     248       1,403  

Sale of businesses

     129       2,305  
    


 


Net Cash Used for Investing Activities

     (18,423 )     (16,752 )
    


 


Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities:

                

Repayments of notes payable, net

     (188 )     —    

Proceeds from revolving credit facility, net

     300       2,100  

Proceeds (repayments) of short-term secured borrowings, net

     10,000       (10,000 )

Repayments of long-term debt

     (510 )     (458 )

Employee stock purchase plan issuances

     817       737  

Stock options exercised

     9,531       4,341  

Dividends paid

     (13,015 )     (12,635 )
    


 


Net Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities

     6,935       (15,915 )
    


 


Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash

     39       418  
    


 


Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents

     (4,621 )     (8,554 )

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period

     14,135       16,053  
    


 


Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

   $ 9,514     $ 7,499  
    


 


Supplemental Cash Flow Information:

                

Income taxes paid during the period

   $ 18,190     $ 17,245  

Interest paid during the period

   $ 18,234     $ 17,904  

 

The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per-share data and as indicated)

 

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

Acuity Brands, Inc. (“Acuity Brands” or the “Company”) is a holding company that owns and manages two businesses that serve distinct markets – lighting equipment and specialty products. The lighting equipment segment designs, produces, and distributes a broad array of indoor and outdoor lighting fixtures for commercial and institutional, industrial, infrastructure, and residential applications for various markets throughout North America and select international markets. The specialty products segment formulates, produces, and distributes specialty chemical products including cleaners, deodorizers, sanitizers, and pesticides for industrial and institutional, commercial, and residential applications, primarily for various markets throughout North America and Europe.

 

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and present the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of Acuity Brands and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. (“Acuity Brands Lighting” or “ABL”) and Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc. (“Acuity Specialty Products” or “ASP”). These interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position as of February 28, 2005 and August 31, 2004, the consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended February 28, 2005 and February 29, 2004, and the consolidated cash flows for the six months ended February 28, 2005 and February 29, 2004. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-year financial statements to conform to the current-year presentation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Acuity Brands as of and for the three years ended August 31, 2004 and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2004 (File No. 001-16583).

 

The results of operations for the three and six months ended February 28, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year because the net sales and net income of the Company are generally higher in the second half of its fiscal year and because of the continued uncertainty of general economic conditions impacting the key end markets of the Company.

 

2. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS YET TO BE ADOPTED

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. The Statement requires that compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements and that this cost be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. It does not specify a preference for a type of valuation model to be used to measure fair value. SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004) covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004) on September 1, 2005 and continues to evaluate the impact the adoption of the final standard will have on the Company’s results of operations. See Note 11 for further information.

 

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 as a result of its project to reduce differences between U.S. and international accounting standards. SFAS No. 151 requires that items such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and rehandling costs be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether or not they meet the criteria currently dictated by ARB No. 43. Additionally, SFAS No. 151 requires that fixed overhead be allocated based on the normal capacity of the production capabilities. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 151 on September 1, 2005 and continues to evaluate the impact the adoption will have on the Company’s results of operations, if any.

 

On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law. This legislation provides for the optional repatriation of cash from foreign subsidiaries allowing an 85 percent dividends received deduction. The deduction is subject to a number of limitations. In December 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (“FSP No. 109-2”), indicating that the lack of clarification of certain provisions within the Jobs Creation Act and the timing of the enactment necessitate a practical exception to the SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, requirement to reflect in the period of enactment the effect of a new tax law. Accordingly, an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Creation Act on its plans for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings. FSP No. 109-2 requires that the provisions of SFAS No. 109 be applied as an enterprise decides on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of its unremitted foreign earnings. The Company has not yet initiated an analysis nor determined if it will repatriate any overseas earnings pursuant to this provision.

 

6


Table of Contents

The FASB also recently issued Staff Position FAS 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (“FSP No. 109-1”). Under the guidance in FSP No. 109-1, the deduction will be treated as a “special deduction” as described in SFAS No. 109. As such, the special deduction has no effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities existing at the enactment date. Rather, the impact of this deduction, if any, will be reported in the period in which the deduction is claimed on our income tax return. The Company will not be able to claim this tax benefit until first quarter of fiscal 2006.

 

3. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

Summarized information for the Company’s acquired intangible assets is as follows:

 

     February 28, 2005

    August 31, 2004

 
     Gross Carrying
Amount


   Accumulated
Amortization


    Gross Carrying
Amount


   Accumulated
Amortization


 

Amortized intangible assets:

                              

Trade names and trademarks

   $ 13,030    $ (2,435 )   $ 13,030    $ (2,217 )

Distribution network

     53,000      (9,865 )     53,000      (8,981 )

Other

     11,857      (5,536 )     11,857      (5,045 )
    

  


 

  


     $ 77,887    $ (17,836 )   $ 77,887    $ (16,243 )
    

  


 

  


Unamortized intangible assets:

                              

Trade names

   $ 65,014            $ 65,014         
    

          

        

 

The Company amortizes trademarks associated with specific products with finite lives and the distribution network over their estimated useful lives of 30 years. Other amortized intangible assets consist primarily of patented technology that is amortized over its estimated useful life of 12 years. Unamortized intangible assets consist of trade names that are expected to generate cash flows indefinitely. The Company tests unamortized intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis, as required by SFAS No. 142. This analysis has not resulted in the recognition of an impairment charge in the current or prior periods. The Company recorded amortization expense of $1.6 million related to intangible assets with finite lives during the six months ended February 28, 2005 and February 29, 2004. Amortization expense is projected to be approximately $3.2 million in each of the next five years.

 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill since August 31, 2004 are summarized as follows:

 

     ABL

   ASP

   Total

Balance as of August 31, 2004

   $ 312,703    $ 30,892    $ 343,595

Currency translation adjustments

     1,389      379      1,768
    

  

  

Balance as of February 28, 2005

   $ 314,092    $ 31,271    $ 345,363
    

  

  

 

The Company tests goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis in the fourth quarter or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may exceed its fair value. The Company’s reporting units are ABL and ASP. The goodwill impairment test has two steps. The first step identifies potential impairments by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. The fair value of ABL and ASP are determined based on a combination of valuation techniques including the expected present value of future cash flows, a market multiple approach, and a comparable transaction approach. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds the carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and the second step is not necessary. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value, the second step calculates the possible impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying value. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recorded. This analysis has not resulted in the recognition of an impairment charge in the current or prior periods.

 

7


Table of Contents

4. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

 

     THREE MONTHS ENDED

    SIX MONTHS ENDED

 
     FEBRUARY 28,
2005


    FEBRUARY 29,
2004


    FEBRUARY 28,
2005


    FEBRUARY 29,
2004


 

Net Sales:

                                

ABL

   $ 381,088     $ 369,388     $ 779,136     $ 760,415  

ASP

     124,033       121,651       251,187       248,162  
    


 


 


 


Total Net Sales

   $ 505,121     $ 491,039     $ 1,030,323     $ 1,008,577  
    


 


 


 


Operating (Loss) Income:

                                

ABL

   $ 10,724     $ 21,222     $ 40,093     $ 48,554  

Special Charge*

     (12,652 )     —         (12,652 )     —    

ASP

     7,093       8,980       14,323       16,389  

Special Charge*

     (2,995 )     —         (2,995 )     —    

Corporate

     (5,314 )     (5,822 )     (13,698 )     (12,544 )

Special Charge*

     (1,353 )     —         (1,353 )     —    
    


 


 


 


Total (Loss) Operating Income

   $ (4,497 )   $ 24,380     $ 23,718     $ 52,399  
    


 


 


 


Depreciation:

                                

ABL

   $ 7,421     $ 8,594     $ 14,388     $ 17,070  

ASP

     2,188       1,992       4,428       3,905  

Corporate

     88       181       176       369  
    


 


 


 


Total Depreciation

   $ 9,697     $ 10,767     $ 18,992     $ 21,344  
    


 


 


 


Amortization:

                                

ABL

   $ 790     $ 790     $ 1,580     $ 1,579  

ASP

     6       6       13       13  

Corporate

     —         —         —         —    
    


 


 


 


Total Amortization

   $ 796     $ 796     $ 1,593     $ 1,592  
    


 


 


 


Capital Expenditures:

                                

ABL

   $ 4,184     $ 9,014     $ 12,009     $ 16,370  

ASP

     2,942       1,560       6,553       4,085  

Corporate

     33       5       238       5  
    


 


 


 


Total Capital Expenditures

   $ 7,159     $ 10,579     $ 18,800     $ 20,460  
    


 


 


 



* See further discussion of Special Charge in Note 13.

 

     Total Assets

     February 28,
2005


   August 31,
2004


ABL

   $ 1,061,764    $ 1,094,762

ASP

     231,080      222,940

Corporate

     50,118      46,827
    

  

     $ 1,342,962    $ 1,364,529
    

  

 

5. INVENTORIES

 

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out or average cost basis) or market and consist of the following:

     February 28,
2005


    August 31,
2004


 

Raw materials and supplies

   $ 83,778     $ 86,027  

Work in process

     16,435       19,623  

Finished goods

     128,375       126,255  
    


 


       228,588       231,905  

Less: reserves

     (11,195 )     (9,645 )
    


 


     $ 217,393     $ 222,260  
    


 


 

8


Table of Contents

6. EARNINGS PER SHARE

 

The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Under this statement, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similarly but reflects the potential dilution that would occur if dilutive options were exercised and restricted stock awards were vested. The following table calculates basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share for the three and six months ended February 28, 2005 and February 29, 2004:

 

     Three Months Ended

   Six Months Ended

     February 28,
2005


    February 29,
2004


   February 28,
2005


   February 29,
2004


Basic (loss) earnings per share:

                            

Net (loss) income

   $ (8,437 )   $ 9,519    $ 4,728    $ 22,436

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

     42,926       41,846      42,683      41,721
    


 

  

  

Basic (loss) earnings per share

   $ (0.20 )   $ 0.23    $ 0.11    $ 0.54
    


 

  

  

Diluted (loss) earnings per share:

                            

Net (loss) income

   $ (8,437 )   $ 9,519    $ 4,728    $ 22,436

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

     42,926       41,846      42,683      41,721

Common stock equivalents (stock options and restricted stock)

     —         1,445      1,561      1,278
    


 

  

  

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

     42,926       43,291      44,244      42,999
    


 

  

  

Diluted (loss) earnings per share

   $ (0.20 )   $ 0.22    $ 0.11    $ 0.52
    


 

  

  

 

7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

During 2004, the Company entered into certain foreign currency contracts to hedge its exposure to variability in exchange rates on certain anticipated intercompany transactions with a Canadian business unit. At February 28, 2005, the Company had foreign currency contracts outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $18.0 million. These contracts mature monthly in $3.0 million increments. The fair value of these contracts represented an unrealized pretax loss of approximately $1.3 million at February 28, 2005.

 

The Company accounts for these contracts in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 137, SFAS No. 138, and SFAS No. 149. The Company’s foreign currency contracts have been designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges and, accordingly, gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair value of these contracts are included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss items until the hedged transaction occurs, at which time the related gains or losses are recognized. Amounts included in future earnings related to these contracts may differ from amounts currently recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive loss items.

 

8. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

The Company accounts for comprehensive income as prescribed by SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. SFAS No. 130 requires the reporting of a measure of all changes in equity that result from recognized transactions and other economic events other than transactions with owners in their capacity as owners. Other comprehensive income included unrealized gains (losses) on foreign currency contracts and foreign currency translation adjustments. The calculation of comprehensive income is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended

   Six Months Ended

     February 28,
2005


    February 29,
2004


   February 28,
2005


    February 29,
2004


Net (loss) income

   $ (8,437 )   $ 9,519    $ 4,728     $ 22,436

Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency contracts, net of tax of $588 and $177 for three months ended and $397 and $132 for six months ended

     1,046       315      (705 )     235

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of $229 and $388 for three months ended and $1,080 and $525 for six months ended

     (882 )     2,635      6,766       7,775
    


 

  


 

Comprehensive (Loss) Income

   $ (8,273 )   $ 12,469    $ 10,789     $ 30,446
    


 

  


 

 

The unrealized gain on foreign currency contracts for the three months ended February 28, 2005 resulted from an increase in the fair value of the foreign currency contracts discussed in Note 7 above and the maturity of certain contracts during the period. The unrealized loss for the six months ended February 28, 2005 resulted from a decrease in the fair value of these contracts and the maturity of certain contracts during the period. Foreign currency translation adjustments for the three months ended February 28, 2005 resulted primarily from the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against certain currencies, particularly the Canadian Dollar. Foreign currency translation adjustments for the six months ended February 28, 2005 resulted from the weakening of the U.S. dollar against certain currencies, particularly the Euro, the British Pound, and the Canadian Dollar.

 

9


Table of Contents

9. SECURED BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT

 

The Company maintains an agreement (“Receivables Facility”) to borrow, on an ongoing basis, funds secured by undivided interests in a defined pool of trade accounts receivable of the lighting equipment and specialty products segments. Effective September 30, 2004, the Company renewed the Receivables Facility for a one-year period and reduced the facility size to $100.0 million from $150.0 million. Net trade accounts receivable pledged as security for borrowings under the Receivables Facility totaled $266.9 million at February 28, 2005. Borrowings at February 28, 2005 under the Receivables Facility totaled $10.0 million. Interest rates under the Receivables Facility vary with commercial paper rates plus an applicable margin. The interest rate, excluding the commitment and usage fee, was approximately 2.6% at February 28, 2005.

 

On April 2, 2004, the Company executed a $200.0 million revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) maturing in January 2009. This facility replaced the Company’s $92.5 million, 364-day committed credit facility scheduled to mature in April 2004 and the Company’s $105.0 million, three-year credit facility scheduled to mature in April 2005. The Revolving Credit Facility contains financial covenants including a leverage ratio (“Maximum Leverage Ratio”) of total indebtedness to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expense), as such terms are defined in the Revolving Credit Facility agreement, and a minimum interest coverage ratio. These ratios are computed at the end of each fiscal quarter for the most recent 12-month period. The Revolving Credit Facility provides for a Maximum Leverage Ratio of 3.50, subject to certain conditions set forth in the agreement. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants and had $4.3 million in outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility at February 28, 2005. At February 28, 2005, the Company had additional borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility, under the most restrictive covenant in effect at the time, of $141.5 million.

 

The Company’s Receivables Facility and Revolving Credit Facility each contain “Material Adverse Effect” provisions. Generally, if the Company were to experience an event causing a Material Adverse Effect on the Company’s financial condition, operations, or properties, as defined in the agreements, additional future borrowings under either facility could be denied and payments on outstanding borrowings could be accelerated. None of the Company’s existing debt instruments include provisions that would require an acceleration of repayments based solely on changes in the Company’s credit ratings.

 

At February 28, 2005, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $26.0 million primarily for the purpose of securing collateral requirements under the casualty insurance programs for Acuity Brands and for providing credit support for the Company’s industrial revenue bonds. At February 28, 2005, a total of $14.2 million of the letters of credit were outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility, thereby reducing the total availability under the line by such amount.

 

In October 2002, Acuity Brands entered into a three-year loan agreement (“Term Loan”) secured by certain land and buildings of the Company. During the first quarter of 2005, the Term Loan was reclassified from Long-Term Debt, less current maturities to Term loan, which is included in Current Liabilities. At February 28, 2005, borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan were $18.4 million.

 

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Litigation

 

Acuity Brands is subject to various legal claims arising in the normal course of business, including patent infringement and product liability claims. Based on information currently available, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of pending and threatened legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Acuity Brands. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of such matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of Acuity Brands in future periods. Acuity Brands establishes reserves for legal claims when the costs associated with the claims become probable and can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts reserved for such claims.

 

The Company has certain matters pending before the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”) involving certain product recalls and has accrued a liability for estimated costs associated with the recalls and proceedings. See further discussion in Product Warranty section of this note.

 

Environmental Matters

 

The operations of the Company are subject to numerous comprehensive laws and regulations relating to the generation, storage, handling, transportation, and disposal of hazardous substances as well as solid and hazardous wastes and to the remediation of contaminated sites. In addition, permits and environmental controls are required for certain of the Company’s operations to limit air and water pollution, and these permits are subject to modification, renewal, and revocation by issuing authorities. On an ongoing

 

10


Table of Contents

basis, Acuity Brands invests capital and incurs operating costs relating to environmental compliance. Environmental laws and regulations have generally become stricter in recent years. The cost of responding to future changes may be substantial. Acuity Brands establishes reserves for known environmental claims when the costs associated with the claims become probable and can be reasonably estimated. The actual cost of environmental issues may be substantially higher or lower than that reserved due to difficulty in estimating such costs and potential changes in the status of government regulations.

 

Certain environmental laws can impose liability regardless of fault. The federal Superfund law is an example of such an environmental law. However, management believes that the Company’s potential liability under Superfund is mitigated by the presence of other parties who will share in the costs associated with the clean up of sites. The extent of liability is determined on a case-by-case basis taking into account many factors, including the number of other parties whose status or activities also subjects them to liability regardless of fault.

 

Acuity Brands is currently a party to, or otherwise involved in, legal proceedings in connection with state and federal Superfund sites. With respect to each of the currently active sites which it does not own and where it has been named as a responsible party or a potentially responsible party (“PRP”), the Company believes its liability is immaterial, based on information currently available, due to its limited involvement at the site and/or the number of viable PRPs. For example, the preliminary allocation among 48 PRPs at the Crymes Landfill site in Georgia indicates that the Company’s liability is not significant, and there are more than 1,000 PRPs at the M&J Solvents site in Georgia, which has included Acuity Brands as a PRP.

 

With respect to the only active site involving property which Acuity Brands does own and where it has been named as a PRP - ASP’s property on Seaboard Industrial Boulevard in Atlanta, Georgia - the Company, together with current and former owners of adjoining properties (the “Site Group”), has conducted an investigation on its property and adjoining properties (the “Site”) and submitted a Compliance Status Report (“CSR”) and a proposed Corrective Action Plan (“CAP”) to the State of Georgia Environmental Protection Division (“EPD”) pursuant to the Georgia Hazardous Site Response Act. The EPD approved the CAP in May 2004, and the Company has reached tentative agreement with the other members of the Site Group to share the costs and responsibilities of implementing the CAP. The CAP requires the Site Group to periodically monitor the Site for a period of five years to confirm the Site Group’s model predicting that the site is not expected to violate applicable regulatory standards. Results from the first three required quarterly sampling events have confirmed the Site Group’s model, but adverse future sampling results could cause the Company to record additional charges to earnings in future periods. However, based on information currently available, the Company believes that its liability is immaterial in connection with the Site.

 

In August 2003, ASP received a grand jury subpoena from the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia concerning the operation of ASP’s wastewater pretreatment plant and ASP’s management of hazardous waste at a facility in Atlanta, Georgia. The grand jury investigation appears to relate to the discharge of wastewater from the facility to the City of Atlanta’s sanitary sewer system and ASP’s practices in connection with the sampling of the facility’s wastewater discharges for permitting purposes. ASP is cooperating with the investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and has completed the production of the required documents. The U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation follows an inquiry by the City of Atlanta, which regulates the wastewater discharge at the facility. The Company has settled with the City of Atlanta all issues arising from the inquiry. As of February 28, 2005, the Company had accrued a liability of approximately $2.0 million to cover various costs including off-site disposal, the estimated costs of resolution of proceedings with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the estimated legal expenses to be incurred by the Company for these matters. The proceedings with the U.S. Attorney are at a preliminary stage, and developments in the investigation and the terms of any final settlement or adjudication of these matters could result in actual costs substantially higher or lower than the amounts reserved.

 

Guarantees and Indemnities

 

The Company is a party to contracts entered into in the normal course of business in which it is common for the Company to agree to indemnify third parties for certain liabilities that may arise out of or relate to the subject matter of the contract. In some cases, the Company cannot estimate the potential amount of future payments under these indemnities until events arise that would result in a liability under the indemnities. In connection with the sale of assets and the divestiture of businesses, the Company has from time to time agreed to indemnify the purchaser from liabilities relating to events occurring prior to the sale and conditions existing at the time of the sale. These indemnities generally include potential environmental liabilities, general representations and warranties concerning the asset or business, and certain other liabilities not assumed by the purchaser. Indemnities associated with the divestiture of businesses are generally limited in amount to the sales price of the specific business or are based on a lower negotiated amount and expire at various times, depending on the nature of the indemnified matter, but in some cases do not expire until the applicable statute of limitations expires.

 

The Company does not believe that any amounts that it may be required to pay under these indemnities will be material to the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.

 

Prior to November 30, 2001, Acuity Brands was a wholly-owned subsidiary of National Service Industries, Inc. (“NSI”) owning and operating the lighting equipment and specialty products businesses. Acuity Brands was spun off from NSI into a separate publicly

 

11


Table of Contents

traded company with its own management and Board of Directors through a tax-free distribution (“Distribution”) of 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Acuity Brands on November 30, 2001. In conjunction with the separation of their businesses, Acuity Brands and NSI entered into various agreements that addressed the allocation of assets and liabilities and defined the Company’s relationship with NSI after the Distribution, including a distribution agreement, a transition services agreement, and a tax disaffiliation agreement:

 

Distribution Agreement-

 

The distribution agreement provides that Acuity Brands will indemnify NSI for pre-Distribution liabilities related to the businesses that comprise Acuity Brands and previously owned businesses in the lighting equipment and specialty products segments. This indemnity does not expire and there is no stated maximum potential liability. To satisfy its obligations under the distribution agreement, Acuity Brands provides letters of credit on behalf of NSI for collateral requirements under NSI’s casualty programs for incurred and projected losses resulting from those segments prior to the Distribution which are covered by NSI casualty programs. This collateral requirement is $1.2 million for 2005, down from $2.4 million for 2004.

 

Transition Services Agreement-

 

In addition to other services described in the agreement (all of which are complete), the transition services agreement provides that Acuity Brands will, for a fee, provide letters of credit to secure NSI’s obligations under various casualty insurance programs of NSI through October 31, 2005 in an amount not to exceed $2.0 million.

 

The letters of credit are issued in favor of the surety company that provides collateral to the states where NSI may have obligations under its various casualty insurance programs. Under this provision, at February 28, 2005, Acuity Brands had $0.7 million of outstanding letters of credit that were issued for the benefit of NSI.

 

In the event NSI is unable to fulfill its obligations under certain of its casualty insurance programs, the standby letters of credit could be drawn upon and Acuity Brands would be required to fund the drawn amount. In such event, NSI would be obligated to reimburse Acuity Brands for such amounts. The management of Acuity Brands currently believes NSI will be able to fulfill its obligations with respect to these standby letters of credit.

 

Tax Disaffiliation Agreement-

 

The tax disaffiliation agreement provides that Acuity Brands will indemnify NSI for certain taxes and liabilities that may arise related to the Distribution and, generally, for deficiencies, if any, with respect to federal, state, local, or foreign taxes of NSI for periods before the Distribution. Liabilities determined under the tax disaffiliation agreement terminate upon the expiration of the applicable statutes of limitation for such liabilities. There is no stated maximum potential liability included in the tax disaffiliation agreement. The Company does not believe that any amounts it is likely to be required to pay under these indemnities will be material to the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. The Company cannot estimate the potential amount of future payments under these indemnities until events arise that would result in a liability under the indemnities.

 

Product Warranty

 

Acuity Brands records an allowance for the estimated amount of future warranty claims when the related revenue is recognized, primarily based on historical experience. Excluding costs related to faulty components provided by third parties, warranty costs as a percentage of net sales have generally been consistent for the last several years. However, there can be no assurance that future warranty costs will not exceed historical experience. If actual future warranty costs exceed historical amounts, additional allowances may be required, which could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations in future periods.

 

In March 2005, the Company expanded a voluntary product recall that had originally commenced in March 2004 after notification to the CPSC in January 2004. The product recall now involves approximately 93,000 lighting fixtures manufactured by ABL from April 2002 through October 2003 that may have incorporated faulty capacitors produced by one of ABL’s suppliers. The recalled fixtures are certain models of indoor high intensity discharge (“HID”) lighting fixtures with at least one acrylic component (reflector or lens). The capacitor used in the recalled fixtures can leak polypropylene glycol (“PPG”) fluid onto the acrylic lens and/or reflector of the fixture, causing the acrylic component(s) to degrade. In several reported instances, this has resulted in lenses or reflectors cracking and pieces of acrylic falling from the fixtures. To date, there have been only limited reports of personal injury and property damage. ABL is providing a replacement fixture or capacitor for every fixture that meets the product recall criteria. In addition to the expenses associated with this product recall, ABL expects to incur higher-than-normal warranty expenses in connection with certain other types of indoor and outdoor HID fixtures that may incorporate the faulty capacitor but exhibit a less serious failure mode. In the case of these fixtures, the PPG fluid may accumulate in or drip from the fixture. ABL will repair or replace these fixtures upon failure.

 

12


Table of Contents

The Company also commenced in March 2005 an additional voluntary product recall of certain indoor HID lighting fixtures in accordance with its notification to the CPSC in September 2004. This additional product recall involves approximately 120,000 lighting fixtures that incorporate acrylic reflectors and that utilize cords manufactured by one of ABL’s suppliers. The cords used in the fixtures may emit a plasticizer fluid that can potentially drip onto the exterior of the acrylic reflectors, which could cause them to degrade, crack, and fall. To date, there have been no reports of personal injury or significant property damage in connection with this issue. The product recall will involve the replacement of the cord and reflector for each fixture subject to the recall.

 

In the first quarter of the 2005 fiscal year, the Company received document and information requests from the CPSC in connection with investigations by the CPSC as to whether the Company had complied with the reporting requirements of section 15(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Act with respect to products involved in the March 2004 recall of HID fixtures and a 2001 recall of emergency lighting fixtures. On February 28, 2005, the Company received a letter from the CPSC staff stating that the CPSC staff had concluded that the Company had violated those reporting requirements with respect to the HID fixtures involved in the 2004 recall, that the staff intended to recommend to the Commission that it take action to seek a civil penalty, and that the Company had the opportunity to negotiate a resolution by submitting a penalty settlement offer. The CPSC staff has also indicated that it intends to assert that reporting requirements were violated in connection with the emergency lighting fixtures involved in the 2001 recall, but the Company has not yet received formal notification of that assertion. On March 15, 2005, the Company responded to the CPSC staff’s February 28th letter by stating that, while it disagrees with the current conclusion of the CPSC staff, it would like to resolve all pending reporting matters in a global resolution and would make a good faith settlement offer to do so when the staff had reached a position with respect to other pending matters. There is no assurance that the CPSC staff will be willing to resolve these matters on a global basis.

 

At February 28, 2005, the Company had accrued an aggregate liability of $8.4 million with respect to the 2004 capacitor-related HID recall and the 2005 expansion of that recall, the 2005 cord-related recall, the matters pending before the CPSC, and associated legal expenses. The actual cost of these matters could be substantially different than the liability recorded by the Company. The Company expects to be reimbursed by a supplier for substantially all product recall expenses and additional warranty expenses regarding the capacitor-related issue and at February 28, 2005 had recorded a receivable of $5.0 million from that supplier. The Company also intends to pursue vigorously the recovery of all costs associated with the cord-related product recall, but there can be no assurance it will be able to recover any portion of the costs.

 

The changes in the product warranty reserve during the six months ended February 28, 2005 are summarized as follows:

 

Balance as of August 31, 2004

   $ 11,694  

Warranty and product recall expense during the period

     1,730  

Payments made during the period

     (3,622 )
    


Balance as of February 28, 2005

   $ 9,802  
    


 

11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 

The Company issues stock options to employees and directors under certain of its benefit plans. Under all stock option plans, the options expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant and have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The Company accounts for the employee and director plans under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations. Additionally, Acuity Brands has adopted the disclosure provisions portion only of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure – an Amendment to FASB Statement No. 123. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recognized for these stock option plans in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards subsequent to the Distribution, consistent with the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net (loss) income and (loss) earnings per share would have been impacted as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended

   Six Months Ended

    

February 28,

2005


   

February 29,

2004


  

February 28,

2005


  

February 29,

2004


Net (loss) income, as reported

   $ (8,437 )   $ 9,519    $ 4,728    $ 22,436

Less: Compensation expense related to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, net of tax

     70       66      146      131

Less: Stock-based compensation determined under fair-value-based method for stock option awards, net of tax

     442       1,026      1,578      1,636
    


 

  

  

Net (loss) income, pro forma

   $ (8,949 )   $ 8,427    $ 3,004    $ 20,669
    


 

  

  

Earnings per share:

                            

Basic (loss) earnings per share – as reported

   $ (0.20 )   $ 0.23    $ 0.11    $ 0.54

Basic (loss) earnings per share – pro forma

   $ (0.21 )   $ 0.20    $ 0.07    $ 0.50

Diluted (loss) earnings per share – as reported

   $ (0.20 )   $ 0.22    $ 0.11    $ 0.52

Diluted (loss) earnings per share – pro forma

   $ (0.21 )   $ 0.20    $ 0.07    $ 0.48

 

13


Table of Contents

The above pro forma calculations only include the effects of options granted subsequent to the Distribution. The pro forma effect of applying SFAS No. 123 may not be representative of the effect on reported net income in future years because options vest over several years and varying amounts of awards are generally made each year.

 

12. PENSION PLANS

 

Acuity Brands has several pension plans covering certain hourly and salaried employees. Benefits paid under these plans are based generally on employees’ years of service and/or compensation during the final years of employment. Acuity Brands makes annual contributions to the plans to the extent indicated by actuarial valuations. Plan assets are invested primarily in equity and fixed income securities.

 

Net periodic pension cost for the Company’s pension plans during the three and six months ended February 28, 2005 and February 29, 2004 included the following components:

 

     Three Months Ended

    Six Months Ended

 
     February 28,
2005


    February 29,
2004


    February 28,
2005


    February 29,
2004


 

Service cost

   $ 904     $ 1,133     $ 1,808     $ 2,266  

Interest cost

     1,907       1,781       3,814       3,562  

Expected return on plan assets

     (1,809 )     (1,593 )     (3,618 )     (3,186 )

Amortization of prior service cost

     22       25       44       50  

Amortization of transitional asset

     (33 )     (33 )     (66 )     (66 )

Recognized actuarial loss

     434       658       868       1,316  
    


 


 


 


Net periodic pension cost

   $ 1,425     $ 1,971     $ 2,850     $ 3,942  
    


 


 


 


 

13. SPECIAL CHARGE

 

On February 22, 2005, the Company announced additional actions to accelerate its efforts to streamline and improve the effectiveness of its operations. As part of this program, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $17.0 million to reflect the costs associated with the elimination of approximately 1,100 positions worldwide. This number is comprised of approximately 500 hourly and 600 salaried personnel. This Company-wide streamlining effort includes facility consolidations and process improvement initiatives and involves ABL, ASP, and the corporate office. The charge included severance and related employee benefits.

 

The changes in the special charge reserve during the six months ended February 28, 2005 are summarized as follows:

 

Balance as of August 31, 2004

   $ —    

Provision

     17,000  

Payments made during the period

     (945 )
    


Balance as of February 28, 2005

   $ 16,055  
    


 

14


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes. References made to years are for fiscal year periods.

 

The purpose of this discussion and analysis is to enhance the understanding and evaluation of the results of operations, financial position, cash flows, indebtedness, and other key financial information of Acuity Brands and its subsidiaries for the periods ended February 28, 2005 and February 29, 2004. For a more complete understanding of this discussion, please read the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. Also, please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2004, for additional information regarding the Company.

 

Overview

 

Company

 

Acuity Brands, Inc. (“Acuity Brands” or the “Company”) is a holding company that owns and manages two businesses that serve distinct markets – lighting equipment and specialty products. The lighting equipment segment of the Company (“Acuity Brands Lighting” or “ABL”) designs, produces, and distributes a broad array of indoor and outdoor lighting fixtures for commercial and institutional, industrial, infrastructure, and residential applications for various markets throughout North America and select international markets. The specialty products segment of Acuity Brands (“Acuity Specialty Products” or “ASP”) formulates, produces, and distributes specialty chemical products including cleaners, deodorizers, sanitizers, and pesticides for industrial and institutional, commercial, and residential applications primarily for various markets throughout North America and Europe. Acuity Brands, with its principal office in Atlanta, Georgia, has approximately 10,000 employees worldwide. While Acuity Brands has been publicly held as a stand-alone company for over three years, the two segments that make up the Company are comprised of organizations with long histories and well-known brands.

 

ABL produces a broad array of indoor and outdoor lighting fixtures for commercial and institutional, industrial, infrastructure, and residential applications for various markets throughout North America and select international markets. ABL is one of the world’s leading producers and distributors of lighting fixtures, with a broad, highly configurable product offering, consisting of roughly 500,000 active products as part of over 2,000 product groups that are sold to approximately 5,000 customers. ABL operates 26 factories and distribution facilities to serve its extensive customer base.

 

ASP is a leading producer of specialty chemical products including cleaners, deodorizers, sanitizers, and pesticides for industrial and institutional, commercial, and residential applications primarily for various markets throughout North America and Europe. ASP sells over 9,000 products through its salaried and commissioned direct sales force, operates six plants, and serves over 300,000 customers through a network of distribution centers and warehouses.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Principal sources of liquidity for the Company are operating cash flows generated primarily from its business segments and various sources of borrowings, primarily from banks. The ability of the Company to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and to be able to access certain capital markets, including banks, is necessary for the Company to meet its obligations as they become due and maintain compliance with covenants contained in its financing agreements. The Company’s ongoing liquidity will depend on a number of factors, including available cash resources, cash flows from operations, and the Company’s ability to comply with covenants contained in certain of its financing agreements.

 

Based on current earnings projections and prevailing market conditions, both for customer demand and various capital markets, the Company believes that during the remainder of 2005 it will have sufficient liquidity and availability under its financing arrangements to fund its operations as currently planned and its anticipated capital investment and profit improvement initiatives, to repay borrowings as currently scheduled, to pay the same quarterly stockholder dividend per share in 2005 as was paid in 2004, and to make required contributions into the Company’s defined benefit plans. The Company expects to invest between $45.0 million and $50.0 million for new plant and equipment and enhanced information technology capabilities at both businesses during 2005, slightly lower than spending in 2004.

 

Cash Flow

 

Acuity Brands used available cash, cash flow, and borrowings in the six months ended February 28, 2005 to fund operations and capital expenditures and to pay dividends. Available cash was benefited by $9.5 million in cash received from the exercise of stock options during the first six months of 2005.

 

15


Table of Contents

The Company generated $6.8 million of net cash from operations during the first six months of 2005 compared to $23.7 million generated in the prior-year period. Cash flow from operations declined $16.9 million due primarily to an increase in cash used to fund accounts payable, partially offset by improvement in cash flow from accounts receivable and reduced inventory levels. Operating working capital (calculated by adding accounts receivables, net, plus inventory, and subtracting accounts payable) increased by approximately $10.6 million to $358.0 million at February 28, 2005 from $347.4 million at August 31, 2004. The increase in operating working capital was due primarily to a $35.5 million decrease in accounts payable, partially offset by a $20.0 million decrease in accounts receivable since August 31, 2004. Pension contributions of approximately $3.1 million in the first six months of 2005 were approximately $2.1 million greater than contributions in the year-ago period. This represents a significant portion of the total pension funding requirements for the Company in 2005.

 

Capital expenditures were $18.8 million in the first six months of 2005, a decrease of approximately $1.7 million from the same period in the prior year. The Company continues to invest in new tooling and equipment primarily to improve productivity and product quality, increase manufacturing efficiencies, and enhance customer service capabilities in each segment.

 

Capitalization

 

The capital structure of the Company is comprised principally of an asset-backed securitization program, borrowings from banks, senior notes, and the equity of its stockholders. Total debt outstanding increased to $405.4 million at February 28, 2005 from $395.7 million at August 31, 2004.

 

Borrowings under the Company’s primary bank financing agreement (“Revolving Credit Facility”) are limited by financial covenants, the most restrictive of which is a leverage ratio calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter. The leverage ratio is calculated by dividing total indebtedness at the end of the quarter by EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expense), as such terms are defined in the Revolving Credit Facility, for the trailing four quarters. The financial covenants included in the Company’s other short-term financing agreements are similar to the financial covenants contained in the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants contained in its financing agreements at February 28, 2005.

 

During the first six months of 2005, the Company’s consolidated stockholders’ equity increased $14.2 million to $492.2 million at February 28, 2005. The increase was due primarily to the issuance of shares under the Company’s compensation programs, the favorable impact of foreign currency translation adjustments, and net income earned during the period, partially offset by the payment of dividends. The Company’s debt to total capital ratio was 45.2% at February 28, 2005, down from 45.3% at August 31, 2004.

 

Dividends

 

The Company paid cash dividends on common stock during the first six months of 2005 of $13.0 million ($0.30 per share). The Company expects to pay annual stockholder dividends of $0.60 per share during 2005, consistent with 2004, subject to quarterly approval by the Board of Directors.

 

Results of Operations

 

Second Quarter of 2005 Compared to Second Quarter of 2004

 

Consolidated Results

 

Net sales for the quarter ended February 28, 2005 were $505.1 million compared to $491.0 million reported for the year-ago period, an increase of $14.1 million, or 2.9%. The growth in net sales, which occurred in both of the Company’s segments, was due primarily to favorable pricing and the mix of products sold within certain channels in the commercial and industrial portions of the lighting and chemical businesses, as well as favorable exchange rate fluctuations, partially offset by lower shipments in certain retail channels. Consolidated gross profit margins declined to 38.6% of net sales for the second quarter of 2005 as compared to 41.0% of net sales reported for the year-ago period. The decline in gross profit margins was due primarily to increases in raw material costs, which outpaced the timing of price increases to customers, and the negative impact of lower production volume. The Company estimates that steel and aluminum costs were more than $8.5 million higher in the second quarter of 2005 compared to the year-ago period. The decline in production volume occurred primarily at ABL and was due to the timing of orders and better management of inventory levels. The decline in production volume was more rapid than the drop in certain manufacturing costs, causing under absorption of these costs.

 

Consolidated operating expenses were $199.7 million (39.5% of net sales), which included a special charge of $17.0 million, for the second quarter of 2005 compared to $177.1 million (36.1% of net sales) for the year-ago period. On February 22, 2005, the Company announced additional actions to accelerate its efforts to streamline and improve the effectiveness of its operations. As part of this program, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $17.0 million to reflect the costs associated with the elimination of approximately 1,100 positions worldwide. This number is comprised of approximately 500 hourly and 600 salaried personnel. This Company-wide streamlining effort includes facility consolidations and process improvement initiatives and involves ABL, ASP, and the corporate office. The charge includes severance and related employee benefits. The Company expects to realize approximately $50.0 million in

 

16


Table of Contents

savings by the end of calendar 2005 resulting from this effort. The remaining $5.6 million increase in operating expenses for the quarter ended February 28, 2005 as compared to the year-ago period was due primarily to higher selling related expenses and other miscellaneous items, including certain product recall related costs.

 

The Company recorded a consolidated operating loss of $4.5 million, including the $17.0 million special charge discussed above, for the second quarter of 2005, compared to $24.4 million in operating profit for the year-ago period. In addition to the special charge, operating profit was also negatively impacted by lower gross profit and higher operating expenses noted above. These increased costs were only partially offset by improved price and mix as noted above. The Company recorded a net loss for the second quarter of 2005 of $8.4 million, which included the after-tax special charge of $11.0 million. Net income for the second quarter of 2004 was $9.5 million. The decrease in net income resulted primarily from the special charge and lower operating profit as noted above. Diluted loss per share for the second quarter of 2005 of $0.20 included a loss of $0.26 due to the special charge. Diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2004 was $0.22.

 

Acuity Brands Lighting

 

Net sales at ABL for the second quarter of 2005 were $381.1 million compared to $369.4 million reported for the year-ago period, an increase of $11.7 million, or 3.2%. The increase was due primarily to improved pricing in the commercial and industrial channel. This was partially offset by a decline in shipments to a non-strategic customer in the home improvement channel. The backlog at ABL increased approximately $0.5 million, or 0.3%, to $159.8 million at February 28, 2005 from $159.3 million at November 30, 2004.

 

ABL recorded an operating loss of $1.9 million, including the $12.7 million special charge discussed above for the second quarter of 2005, compared to $21.2 million in operating profit reported for the prior year. In addition to the special charge, operating profit was negatively impacted by rising raw material costs, lower absorption of manufacturing costs due to decreased production, reduced shipments in certain channels noted above, and certain other items, including selling and product recall related costs. These factors were partially offset by the improved pricing and favorable mix of products sold as discussed above.

 

Acuity Specialty Products

 

Net sales at ASP for the second quarter of 2005 were $124.0 million compared to $121.7 million reported for the year-ago period, representing an increase of $2.3 million. The increase in net sales was due primarily to improved pricing in the institutional and industrial (“I&I”) channel, greater shipments in certain foreign markets, and favorable exchange rate variances, partially offset by lower shipments in the retail channel.

 

Operating profit at ASP for the second quarter of 2005 decreased to $4.1 million from $9.0 million reported for the year-ago period. Operating profit at ASP for the second quarter of 2005 included $3.0 million of the special charge discussed above. In addition to the special charge, operating profit was negatively impacted by rising raw material costs and bad debt costs related to the bankruptcy of a specific customer.

 

Corporate

 

Corporate expenses were $6.7 million for the second quarter of 2005 (including $1.3 million of the special charge discussed above) compared to $5.8 million for the year-ago period. The increase of $0.9 million was due primarily to the special charge and higher expenses associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, partially offset by lower employee-related costs.

 

Income Taxes

 

The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2005 was 35.4%, compared to 36.0% for the second quarter of 2004. The Company will continue to evaluate its effective tax rate on a quarterly basis but, based on current facts and circumstances, expects the rate to approximate 35.0% for the full year.

 

Other Expense (Income)

 

Other expense (income) for Acuity Brands consisted primarily of interest expense and other miscellaneous non-operating activity including gains or losses on the sale of assets and foreign currency transactions. Interest expense, net, was $9.1 million, an increase of $0.2 million, or 2.2%, from the year-ago period. This increase was due primarily to a higher weighted average interest rate for the second quarter of 2005 compared to the second quarter of 2004.

 

Six Months of 2005 Compared to Six Months of 2004

 

Consolidated Results

 

Net sales for the six months ended February 28, 2005 were $1,030.3 million compared to $1,008.6 million reported for the year-ago period, an increase of $21.7 million, or 2.2%. The growth in net sales, which occurred in both of the Company’s segments, was due primarily to favorable pricing and the mix of products sold within certain channels in the commercial and industrial portions of the

 

17


Table of Contents

lighting and chemical businesses, partially offset by lower shipments in certain retail channels. Consolidated gross profit margins decreased to 40.2% of net sales for the six months ended February 28, 2005 as compared to 41.3% of net sales reported for the year-ago period. The decline was due primarily to increases in raw material costs, which outpaced the timing of price increases to customers, and to the impact of lower production volume in the second quarter of 2005. The Company estimates that steel and aluminum costs were more than $16.5 million higher for the six months ended February 28, 2005 compared to the year-ago period.

 

Consolidated operating expenses were $390.3 million (37.9% of net sales), which included a special charge of $17.0 million, for the six months ended February 28, 2005, compared to $363.8 million (36.1% of net sales) for the year-ago period. On February 22, 2005, the Company announced additional actions to accelerate its efforts to streamline and improve the effectiveness of its operations. As part of this program, the Company recorded a pretax charge of $17.0 million to reflect the costs associated with the elimination of approximately 1,100 positions worldwide. This number is comprised of approximately 500 hourly and 600 salaried personnel. This ongoing Company-wide streamlining effort includes facility consolidations and process improvement initiatives and involves ABL, ASP, and the corporate office. The charge included severance and related employee benefits. The Company expects to realize approximately $50.0 million in savings by the end of calendar 2005 resulting from this effort. The remaining $9.5 million increase in operating expenses for the six months ended February 28, 2005 as compared to the year-ago period, was due primarily to costs related to product recalls and higher costs for warranty, selling, commissions, and freight.

 

Consolidated operating profit decreased $28.7 million or 54.8% to $23.7 million from $52.4 million for the year-ago period. Operating profit in the first half of 2005 included the $17.0 million special charge discussed above. The decline in operating profit was due to the special charge, lower gross profit, and higher operating expenses noted above. Net income for the six months ended February 28, 2005 was $4.7 million, which included the after-tax special charge of $11.1 million. Net income for the six months ended February 29, 2004 was $22.4 million. The decrease in net income resulted primarily from the special charge and lower operating profit as noted above. Diluted earnings per share for the six months ended February 28, 2005 of $0.11 included a loss of $0.25 due to the special charge. Diluted earnings per share for the six months ended February 29, 2004 was $0.52.

 

Acuity Brands Lighting

 

Net sales at ABL for the six months ended February 28, 2005 were $779.1 million compared to $760.4 million reported for the year-ago period, an increase of $18.7 million, or 2.5%. The increase was due primarily to improved pricing and a more favorable mix of product sold. Those improvements were partially offset by a decline in shipments in the commercial and industrial channel and to a non-strategic customer in the home improvement channel. The backlog at ABL increased approximately $7.0 million, or 4.6%, to $159.8 million at February 28, 2005 from $152.8 million at August 31, 2004.

 

Operating profit at ABL decreased $21.2 million, or 43.6%, to $27.4 million for the six months ended February 28, 2005 from $48.6 million reported for the prior-year period. Operating profit at ABL for the six months ended February 28, 2005 included $12.7 million of the special charge discussed above. In addition to the special charge, operating profit was negatively impacted by lower sales volume in certain channels, rising raw material costs, and product recall and warranty costs. These factors were partially offset by the improved pricing and mix discussed above.

 

Acuity Specialty Products

 

Net sales at ASP for the six months ended February 28, 2005 were $251.2 million compared to $248.2 million reported for the year-ago period, representing an increase of $3.0 million. The increase in net sales was due primarily to improved pricing in the institutional and industrial (“I&I”) channel and increased international sales, partially offset by lower shipments in the retail channel.

 

Operating profit at ASP for the six months ended February 28, 2005 decreased to $11.3 million from $16.4 million reported for the year-ago period. Operating profit at ASP for the six months ended February 28, 2005 included $3.0 million of the special charge discussed above. In addition to the special charge, operating profit was negatively impacted by rising raw material costs and a bad debt charge related to the bankruptcy of a specific customer.

 

Corporate

 

Corporate expenses were $15.0 million for the six months ended February 28, 2005 (including $1.3 million of the special charge discussed above) compared to $12.5 million for the year-ago period. The increase of $2.5 million was due primarily to the special charge, increased expenses related to long-term incentive programs, and higher costs for compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley, partially offset by lower employee-related costs.

 

Income Taxes

 

The effective tax rate for the six months ended February 28, 2005 was 34.6%, compared to 36.0% for the six months ended February 29, 2004. The Company will continue to evaluate its effective tax rate on a quarterly basis but, based on current facts and circumstances, expects the rate to approximate 35.0% for the full year.

 

18


Table of Contents

Other Expense (Income)

 

Other expense (income) for Acuity Brands consisted primarily of interest expense and other miscellaneous non-operating activity including gains or losses on the sale of assets and foreign currency transactions. Interest expense, net, was $18.0 million, an increase of $0.4 million, or 2.3%, from the year-ago period. This increase was due primarily to a higher weighted average interest rate for the six months ended February 28, 2005 compared to the six months ended February 29, 2004 and, to a lesser extent, higher debt balances over the course of the six months in comparison to the year-ago period.

 

Outlook

 

Management anticipates that the second half of fiscal year 2005 will continue to be challenging due to the potential impact of the following factors: inconsistent demand in key markets, particularly non-residential construction and retail; rising costs, particularly for certain components and raw materials; the inability to raise prices to customers; growing government regulations; and the short-term cost of ongoing process improvement initiatives. However, while these factors could negatively impact second half performance, the Company sees increasing strength in the Company’s traditional markets, consistent with industry trends. In addition, management expects to realize benefits from the additional actions to accelerate its efforts to streamline operations, improved customer service capabilities, continuous improvement initiatives, and annual product and price review programs in the second half of 2005. Absent a material negative impact from the factors noted above, management expects to make meaningful progress for the second half of 2005 towards its long-term goals.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations addresses the financial condition and results of operations as reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to: inventory valuation; depreciation, amortization and the recoverability of long-lived assets, including intangible assets; medical, product warranty, and other reserves; litigation; and environmental matters. Management bases its estimates and judgments on its substantial historical experience and other relevant factors, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management discusses the development of accounting estimates with the Company’s Audit Committee. For a detailed discussion of significant accounting policies that may involve a higher degree of judgment, please refer to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2004.

 

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

 

This filing contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that involve risks and uncertainties. Consequently, actual results may differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Statements made herein that may be considered forward-looking include statements that relate to future performance or results of the Company, including without limitation statements relating to: (a) the Company’s expectations regarding liquidity and availability under its financing arrangements to fund its operations as currently planned and its anticipated capital investment and profit improvement initiatives, debt payments, dividend payments, and required contributions into its defined benefit plans; (b) the planned spending of approximately $45.0 to $50.0 million for new plant and equipment and enhanced information technology capabilities at both businesses during 2005; (c) the planned payment of annual stockholder dividends of $0.60 per share during 2005; (d) the Company’s expectations regarding the effective tax rate for the remainder of the year; (e) expected progress towards the achievement of management’s long-term financial goals; and (f) the expected realization of benefits from the additional actions to accelerate its efforts to streamline operations, improved customer service capabilities, continuous improvement initiatives, and annual product and price review programs. Where possible, the Company has attempted to identify the forward-looking statements contained in this filing by using words such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions in connection with any discussion of the Company’s future performance or results. A variety of risks and uncertainties could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties include without limitation the following: (a) the uncertainty of general business and economic conditions, including the potential for a more severe slowdown in non-residential construction and other industrial markets, changes in interest rates, and fluctuations in commodity and raw material prices or foreign currency rates; (b) the risk of economic, political, military, or other events in a country where the Company manufactures, procures, or sources a significant amount of raw materials, component parts, or finished goods; (c) the Company’s ability to realize the anticipated benefits of initiatives expected to reduce costs, improve profits, enhance customer service, increase manufacturing efficiency, reduce debt, and expand product offerings and brands in the market through a variety of channels; (d) the risk that the Company will be unable to execute its various initiatives within expected

 

19


Table of Contents

timeframes; (e) unexpected developments in the Company’s legal and environmental matters, including the matter related to the operation of ASP’s wastewater pretreatment plant and ASP’s management of hazardous waste at a facility in Atlanta, Georgia; (f) the risk that projected future cash flows from operations are not realized; (g) the impact of unforeseen factors on the Company’s critical accounting estimates; (h) the impact of competition; and (i) unexpected changes in the Company’s share price.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

General. Acuity Brands is exposed to market risks that may impact the Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Income, and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows due primarily to changing interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The following discussion provides additional information regarding the market risks of Acuity Brands.

 

Interest Rates. Interest rate fluctuations expose the variable-rate debt of Acuity Brands to changes in interest expense and cash flows. The variable-rate debt of Acuity Brands, primarily short-term secured borrowings and amounts outstanding under the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility, Term Loan, and long-term industrial revenue bonds amounted to $45.6 million at February 28, 2005. Based on outstanding borrowings at quarter end, a 10% increase in market interest rates at February 28, 2005 would have resulted in additional annual after-tax interest expense of approximately $0.1 million. A fluctuation in interest rates would not affect interest expense or cash flows related to the $360.0 million publicly traded notes, Acuity Brands’ primary fixed-rate debt. A 10% increase in market interest rates at February 28, 2005 would have decreased the fair value of these notes by approximately $8.4 million. See Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, contained in this Form 10-Q, for additional information regarding the Company’s long-term debt.

 

Foreign Exchange Rates. The majority of net sales, expense, and capital purchases of Acuity Brands are transacted in U.S. dollars. Acuity Brands does not believe a 10% fluctuation in average foreign currency rates would have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, during 2004, the Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge its exposure to variability in exchange rates on certain anticipated intercompany transactions with a Canadian business unit. At February 28, 2005, the Company had foreign currency contracts outstanding with an aggregate notional amount of $18.0 million. These contracts mature monthly in $3.0 million increments. The fair value of these contracts represented an unrealized pretax loss of approximately $1.3 million at February 28, 2005.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

As required by Commission rules, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of February 28, 2005. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at a reasonable assurance level. However, because all disclosure procedures must rely to some degree on actions or decisions made by employees throughout the organization, such as reporting of material events, the Company and its reporting officers believe that they cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company will be detected. Limitations within any control system, including the Company’s control system, include faulty judgments in decision-making or simple errors or mistakes. In addition, controls can be circumvented by an individual, by collusion between two or more people, or by management override of the control. Because of these limitations, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

 

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (a) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the issuer; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the issuer are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations of management and directors of the issuer; and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the issuer’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. There were no significant changes to the Company’s internal control structure over financial reporting during the second quarter of 2005 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

20


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

Acuity Brands is subject to various legal claims arising in the normal course of business, including patent infringement and product liability claims. Based on information currently available, and except as described below, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of pending and threatened legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Acuity Brands. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of such matters, if unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of Acuity Brands in future periods. Acuity Brands establishes reserves for legal claims when the costs associated with the claims become probable and can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving legal claims may be substantially higher than the amounts reserved for such claims. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004.

 

The Company has certain matters pending before the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”) involving certain product recalls and has accrued a liability for estimated costs associated with the recalls and proceedings. See further discussion in Product Warranty section Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

At the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders held on January 6, 2005, all nominees to the Company’s board of directors were elected to the board without opposition. The board members elected by the Company’s stockholders were John L. Clendenin, Robert F. McCullough, and Neil Williams.

 

The vote on this proposal was:

 

   

For


 

Withheld


John L. Clendenin

  36,884,896     1,988,809

Robert F. McCullough

  24,335,978   14,537,727

Neil Williams

  36,535,261     2,338,444

 

The stockholders also ratified the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accountants. The result of the vote was 36,403,405 shares for, 2,423,478 shares against, with 46,822 abstentions.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibits are listed on the Index to Exhibits (page 23).

 

21


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

    

ACUITY BRANDS, INC.

REGISTRANT

DATE: April 4, 2005

  

/s/ Vernon J. Nagel


    

VERNON J. NAGEL

CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

DATE: April 4, 2005

  

/s/ Karen J. Holcom


    

KAREN J. HOLCOM

VICE PRESIDENT, CONTROLLER, AND

INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

22


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

EXHIBIT 3 (a)    Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Acuity Brands, Inc.   Reference is made to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant’s Form 8-K as filed with the Commission on December 14, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(b)    Amended and Restated By-Laws of Acuity Brands, Inc.   Reference is made to Exhibit 3(b) to the registrant’s Form 10-Q as filed with the Commission on July 6, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference.
EXHIBIT 10(iii)A (1)    Acuity Brands, Inc. Matching Gift Program   Filed with the Commission as part of this Form 10-Q.
EXHIBIT 31 (a)    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.   Filed with the Commission as part of this Form 10-Q.
(b)    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.   Filed with the Commission as part of this Form 10-Q.
EXHIBIT 32 (a)    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.   Filed with the Commission as part of this Form 10-Q.
(b)    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.   Filed with the Commission as part of this Form 10-Q.

 

23