Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 0-23976

FIRST NATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (540) 465-9121

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $2.50 par value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing sales price on June 30, 2004 was $49,419,167.

The number of outstanding shares of common stock as of March 28, 2005 was 1,462,062.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

2004 Annual Report to Shareholders – Part II

Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders – Part III

1

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

Part I

GENERAL

First National Corporation (the Company) is a financial holding company incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia on September 7, 1983. The Company owns all of the stock of its primary operating subsidiary, First Bank (the Bank), which is an independent commercial bank chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

The Bank was originally opened for business on July 1, 1907 under the name The Peoples National Bank of Strasburg. On January 10, 1928 the Bank changed its name to the First National Bank of Strasburg. On April 12, 1994, the Bank received approval from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the Federal Reserve) and the Virginia State Corporation Commission’s Bureau of Financial Institutions (the SCC) to convert to a state chartered bank with membership in the Federal Reserve System. The Bank was given one year from approval to convert. On June 1, 1994, the Bank consummated such conversion and changed its name to First Bank.

The Bank has one wholly owned subsidiary, First Bank Financial Services, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, which invests in partnerships that provide title insurance and investment services. The Company is also the parent company of First National (VA) Statutory Trust I (Trust I) and First National (VA) Statutory Trust II (Trust II). Trust I and Trust II were formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities, commonly known as trust preferred securities.

ACCESS TO FILINGS

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, and previous filings on Form 10-Q and 8-K, are available at www.firstbank-va.com. A copy of the Company’s filings will be sent, without charge, to any shareholder upon written request to: M. Shane Bell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, at 112 West King Street, Strasburg, Virginia 22657.

BANKING SERVICES

The Bank provides commercial, residential and consumer loans, a variety of deposit products, investments, trust and other services to its customers in the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia. Loan services include personal and installment loans (including automobile and property improvement loans), residential mortgages, adjustable rate mortgages, bi-weekly mortgages, home equity loans, equipment leasing services, and credit cards and commercial loans.

Deposit products include checking, statement savings, NOW accounts, money market accounts, IRA deposits, certificates of deposit, Christmas club accounts, direct deposit programs, club accounts, and investment savings accounts. The Bank also offers its customers other general banking services, such as safe deposit facilities, travelers checks and collections, on-line wire transfer services, and acts as agent for the purchase and redemption of United States Savings Bonds.

In January 2005, the Bank actively began trust services in the Trust and Asset Management Services department. Services include estate planning and investment services. Investment services include investment management of assets, trustee under an agreement, trustee under a will, individual retirement accounts and estate settlement.

The Bank’s market area is primarily located within the northern Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, including Shenandoah County, Warren County, Frederick County and the City of Winchester. Within the market area there are various types of businesses supporting the economy including medical services, manufacturers, retail facilities, colleges and universities, and professional service firms. The Bank’s customers include individuals and small to medium-sized businesses, including retail shops and professional service businesses, residing in this service area. Distribution of the Company’s products and services are provided by nine branches and 26 ATMs located throughout the market area.

3

Table of Contents

COMPETITION

The Company competes with large regional financial institutions, savings and loan and other community banks, consumer finance companies, insurance companies, as well as credit unions and mutual funds. Competition has increasingly come from out-of-state banks through their acquisition of Virginia-based banks and branches.

The financial service business in Virginia, and in the Company’s primary service area specifically, is highly competitive with respect to loan and deposit products, and other financial services. Among the advantages the large regional financial institutions have over the Company are their ability to support wide-ranging advertising campaigns and, as a result of their larger size, to have substantially higher lending limits.

Factors affecting the competition for loans and deposits are interest rates offered, the number and location of branches and types of products offered, as well as the reputation of the institution. Advantages the Company has over the competition include long-term customer relationships, its commitment to excellent customer service, its dedicated and loyal employees, its local management and directors, and the support and involvement in the communities that the Company serves. The Company focuses its financial services to serve both individuals and small to medium-size businesses within the community. According to FDIC data as of June 30, 2004, the Bank was ranked second in Shenandoah County with $148.8 million in deposits, representing 25.0% of the total deposit market. The Bank was ranked fourth in Frederick County with $34.5 million or 11.6% of the market and fourth in Warren County with $57.3 million or 15.0% of the market.

No material part of the business of the Company is dependent upon a single or a few customers, and the loss of any single customer would not have a materially adverse effect upon the business of the Company.

EMPLOYEES

At December 31, 2004, the Company and the Bank employed a total of 118 full-time equivalent employees. The Company considers relations with its employees to be excellent.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

As a financial holding company, the Company is subject to regulation under the Federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the examination and reporting requirements of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. As a state-chartered commercial bank, the Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Virginia State Corporation Commission’s Bureau of Financial Institutions. It is also subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve Board. Other federal and state laws, including various consumer and compliance laws, govern the activities of the Bank, the investments that it makes and the aggregate amount of loans that it may grant to one borrower. Laws and regulations administered by the regulatory agencies also affect corporate practices, including business practices related to payment and charging of interest, documentation and disclosures, and affect the ability to open and close offices or purchase other affiliates.

The following description summarizes the significant federal and state laws applicable to the Company’s industry. To the extent that statutory or regulatory provisions are described, the description is qualified in its entirety by reference to that particular statutory or regulatory provision.

The Bank Holding Company Act

Under the Bank Holding Company Act, the Company is subject to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve and required to file periodic reports regarding its operations and any additional information that the Federal Reserve may require. Activities at the bank holding company level are limited to:

4

Table of Contents

Some of the activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation to be closely related to the business of a bank holding company include making or servicing loans and specific types of leases, performing specific data processing services and acting in some circumstances as a fiduciary or investment or financial adviser.

With some limited exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before:

In addition, and subject to some exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with their regulations, require Federal Reserve approval prior to any person or company acquiring “control” of a bank holding company. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the bank holding company. Control is rebuttably presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more, but less than 25%, of any class of voting securities and either the company has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction. The regulations provide a procedure for challenging this rebuttable control presumption.

In November 1999, Congress enacted the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLBA), which made substantial revisions to the statutory restrictions separating banking activities from other financial activities. Under the GLBA, bank holding companies that are well-capitalized and well-managed and meet other conditions can elect to become “financial holding companies.” As financial holding companies, they and their subsidiaries are permitted to acquire or engage in previously impermissible activities such as insurance underwriting, securities underwriting and distribution, travel agency activities, insurance agency activities, merchant banking and other activities that the Federal Reserve determines to be financial in nature or complementary to these activities. Financial holding companies continue to be subject to the overall oversight and supervision of the Federal Reserve, but the GLBA applies the concept of functional regulation to the activities conducted by subsidiaries. For example, insurance activities would be subject to supervision and regulation by state insurance authorities.

Capital Requirements

The Federal Reserve Board has issued risk-based and leverage capital guidelines applicable to banking organizations that it supervises. Under the risk-based capital requirements, the Company and the Bank are each generally required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) of 8%. At least half of the total capital must be composed of “Tier 1 Capital”, which is defined as common equity, retained earnings and qualifying perpetual preferred stock, less certain intangibles. The remainder may consist of “Tier 2 Capital”, which is defined as specific subordinated debt, some hybrid capital instruments and other qualifying preferred stock and a limited amount of the loan loss allowance. In addition, each of the federal banking regulatory agencies has established minimum leverage capital requirements for banking organizations. Under these requirements, banking organizations must maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average quarterly assets equal to 3% to 5%, subject to federal bank regulatory evaluation of an organization’s overall safety and soundness.

The risk-based capital standards of the Federal Reserve Board explicitly identify concentrations of credit risk and the risk arising from non-traditional activities, as well as an institution’s ability to manage these risks, as important factors to be taken into account by the agency in assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy. The capital guidelines also provide that an institution’s exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates be considered by the agency as a factor in evaluating a banking organization’s capital adequacy.

The FDIC may take various corrective actions against any undercapitalized bank and any bank that fails to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or fails to implement a plan accepted by the FDIC. These powers include, but are not limited to, requiring the institution to be recapitalized, prohibiting asset growth, restricting

5

Table of Contents

interest rates paid, requiring prior approval of capital distributions by any bank holding company that controls the institution, requiring divestiture by the institution of its subsidiaries or by the holding company of the institution itself, requiring new election of directors, and requiring the dismissal of directors and officers. The Bank presently maintains sufficient capital to remain in compliance with these capital requirements.

Dividends

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its banking and other subsidiaries. The majority of the Company’s revenues are from dividends paid to the Company by its subsidiaries. The Bank is subject to laws and regulations that limit the amount of dividends it can pay. In addition, both the Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory restrictions relating to the payment of dividends, including requirements to maintain capital at or above regulatory minimums. Banking regulators have indicated that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only if the organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fully fund the dividends and the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Company does not expect that any of these laws, regulations or policies will materially affect the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Bank transferred $1.7 million in dividends to the Company. As of December 31, 2004, the aggregate amount of unrestricted funds which could be transferred from the banking subsidiary to the parent Company, without prior regulatory approval, totaled $4.4 million.

The FDIC has the general authority to limit the dividends paid by insured banks if the payment is deemed an unsafe and unsound practice. The FDIC has indicated that paying dividends that deplete a bank’s capital base to an inadequate level would be an unsound and unsafe banking practice.

Insurance of Accounts

The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC up to the limits set forth under applicable law. The deposits of the Bank subsidiary are subject to the deposit insurance assessments of the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) of the FDIC. The FDIC has implemented a risk-based deposit insurance assessment system under which the assessment rate for an insured institution may vary according to regulatory capital levels of the institution and other factors, including supervisory evaluations. In addition, the FDIC has authority to impose special assessments from time to time.

The FDIC is authorized to prohibit any BIF-insured institution from engaging in any activity that the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious threat to the respective insurance fund. Also, the FDIC may initiate enforcement actions against banks, after first giving the institution’s primary regulatory authority an opportunity to take such action. The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any depository institution if it determines, after a hearing, that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed in writing by the FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for the permanent termination of insurance, if the institution has no tangible capital. If deposit insurance is terminated, the deposits at the institution at the time of termination, less subsequent withdrawals, shall continue to be insured for a period from six months to two years, as determined by the FDIC. The Company is not aware of any existing circumstances that could result in termination of any of the Bank’s deposit insurance.

USA Patriot Act

The USA Patriot Act became effective on October 26, 2001 and provides for the facilitation of information sharing among governmental entities and financial institutions for the purpose of combating terrorism and money laundering. Among other provisions, the USA Patriot Act permits financial institutions, upon providing notice to the United States Treasury, to share information with one another in order to better identify and report to the federal government concerning activities that may involve money laundering or terrorists’ activities. Interim rules implementing the USA Patriot Act were issued effective March 4, 2003. The USA Patriot Act is considered a significant banking law in terms of information disclosure regarding certain customer transactions. Although it does create a reporting obligation, the Bank does not expect the USA Patriot Act to materially affect its products, services or other business activities.

6

Table of Contents

Community Reinvestment Act

Under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations, depository institutions have an affirmative obligation to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas, including low and moderate-income areas, consistent with safe and sound banking practice. The Community Reinvestment Act requires the adoption by each institution of a Community Reinvestment Act statement for each of its market areas describing the depository institution’s efforts to assist in its community’s credit needs. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act and are periodically assigned ratings in this regard. Banking regulators consider a depository institution’s Community Reinvestment Act rating when reviewing applications to establish new branches, undertake new lines of business, and/or acquire part or all of another depository institution. An unsatisfactory rating can significantly delay or even prohibit regulatory approval of a proposed transaction by a bank holding company or its depository institution subsidiaries.

Privacy Legislation

Several regulations issued by federal banking agencies also provide protections against the transfer and use of customer information by financial institutions. A financial institution must provide its customers information regarding its policies and procedures with respect to the handling of customers’ personal information. Each institution must conduct an internal risk assessment of its ability to protect customer information. These privacy provisions generally prohibit a financial institution from providing a customer’s personal financial information to unaffiliated parties without prior notice and approval from the customer.

The following describes the location and general character of the principal offices and other materially important physical properties of the Company.

The Company owns the headquarters building located at 112 West King Street, in Strasburg, Virginia. This location also serves as the Strasburg Financial Center, which primarily serves the banking needs of northern Shenandoah County customers. This three story building also houses the administrative personnel of the Company, including human resources, marketing, financial accounting and operations. The financial centers provide full service banking while the bank branches primarily focus on depository and consumer lending functions.

The Company owns the Front Royal Financial Center located at 1717 Shenandoah Avenue, Front Royal, Virginia. This location primarily serves the banking needs of Warren County customers. This one story building was opened for business in 2002.

The Company owns the Winchester Financial Center located at 1835 Valley Avenue, Winchester, Virginia. This location primarily serves the banking needs of Frederick County and City of Winchester customers. This two story building was opened for business in 2003.

The Company owns the Mt. Jackson Financial Center located at 5304 Main Street, Mt. Jackson, Virginia. This location primarily serves the banking needs of southern Shenandoah County customers. This one story building was opened for business in 2004.

The Company also owns three branch buildings and leases two branch buildings. These branches are located throughout the market area. Rental expense for these leased locations totaled $64 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2004.

All of the Company’s properties are in good operating condition and are adequate for the Company’s present and future needs.

7

Table of Contents

Occasionally, during the course of its operations, the Company and its subsidiaries have been parties to legal proceedings. The Company has been a defendant in an action filed in October 2002 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia by John M. Floyd & Associates, Inc., a vendor of overdraft privilege programs. Floyd claimed breach of an alleged contract arising from the Company’s decision not to install Floyd’s overdraft privilege program, and was seeking the fee it would have received under that alleged contract. In March 2005, the Company and Floyd signed a written agreement to settle the action and dismiss the lawsuit. The settlement agreement does not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations.

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or to which the property of the Company is subject.

No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders of the Company through a solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

Part II

Shares of the common stock of the Company are traded on the over-the-counter (OTC) market and quoted in the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “FXNC.” As of February 17, 2005, there were approximately 710 shareholders of record.

Following are the high and low closing prices along with the dividends that were paid quarterly in 2004 and 2003. Over-the-counter market quotations reflect interdealer prices, without retail mark up, mark down, or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

For additional information with respect to the payment of dividends, see “Supervision and Regulation—Dividends” in Item 1 above.

The Company did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the fourth quarter of 2004.

8

Table of Contents

The following is selected financial data for the Company for the last five years.

9

Table of Contents

The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

First National Corporation (the Company) is the financial holding company of First Bank (the Bank), First National (VA) Statutory Trust I (Trust I) and First National (VA) Statutory Trust II (Trust II). The Trusts were formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities, commonly known as trust preferred securities. First Bank owns First Bank Financial Services, Inc., which invests in partnerships that provide title insurance and investment services.

The Company’s banking subsidiary, First Bank, is community-oriented and offers services customarily provided by full-service banks, including individual and commercial demand and time deposit accounts, commercial and consumer loans, residential mortgages, credit card services, deposit services, personal trust services and wealth management services. The Bank offers internet banking access for banking services, and online bill payment for both consumers and commercial customers. Lending is focused on individuals and small and medium-sized businesses in the northern Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia.

Earnings and assets of the Company continued to grow in 2004. Net income for 2004 was $4.2 million compared to $3.3 million in 2003 and $3.0 million in 2002. Net income per share, basic and diluted for 2004 was $2.88, compared to $2.23 in 2003 and $1.89 in 2002. The increase in earnings resulted primarily from a continuing increase in the Company’s net interest income. Return on average assets was 1.12% in 2004, 1.05% in 2003 and 1.09% in 2002. Return on average equity was 17.01% in 2004, 14.37% in 2003 and 12.99% in 2002.

Assets grew 19.0% in 2004 and 16.1% in 2003. Growth occurred primarily in the loan portfolio where loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, increased $74.6 million to $320.2 million. The securities portfolio decreased to $63.4 million in 2004 from $70.9 million in 2003.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Company makes forward looking statements in this annual report that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward looking statements include statements regarding profitability, liquidity, allowance for loan losses, interest rate sensitivity, market risk, growth strategy and financial and other goals. The words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” or other similar words or terms are intended to identify forward looking statements.

These forward looking statements are subject to significant uncertainties because they are based upon or are affected by factors including:

10

Table of Contents

Because of these uncertainties, actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward looking statements. In addition, past results of operations do not necessarily indicate future results.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

General

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The financial information contained within the statements is, to a significant extent, financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. The Company uses historical loss factors as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in the loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors that the Company uses. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact transactions could change. For further information about the Company’s loans and the allowance for loan losses, see Notes 3 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Allowance for loan losses

The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (i) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 5 “Accounting for Contingencies,” which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable and (ii) SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan,” which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance.

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The Bank’s allowance for loan losses has two basic components: the specific allowance and the formula allowance. Both of these components are determined based upon estimates that can and do change when the actual events occur.

The specific allowance is used to individually allocate an allowance for larger balance, non-homogeneous loans, typically commercial loans. The specific allowance uses various techniques to arrive at an estimate of loss. First, analysis of the borrower’s overall financial condition, resources and payment record; the prospects for support from financial guarantors; and the fair market value, net of selling costs, of collateral are used to estimate the probability and severity of inherent losses. Additionally, historical default rates and loss severities, internal risk ratings, industry and market conditions and trends, and other environmental factors are considered. The use of these values is inherently subjective and actual losses could differ from the estimates.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual

11

Table of Contents

terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value (net of selling costs), and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, net of selling costs, if the loan is collateral dependent.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures.

The formula allowance is used for estimating the loss on pools of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans; including residential mortgage loans, installment loans, other consumer loans, and outstanding loan commitments. This formula is also used for the remaining pool of larger balance, non-homogeneous loans, which were not allocated a specific allowance upon impairment review. The formula allowance begins with estimates of probable losses inherent in the homogeneous portfolio based upon various statistical analyses. These include analysis of historical delinquency and loss experience over a five-year period, together with analyses that reflect current economic trends and conditions. The formula allowance uses a historical loss view as an indicator of future losses. As a result, even though this history is regularly updated with the most recent loss information, it could differ from the loss incurred in the future.

CREDIT POLICIES

The principal risk associated with each of the categories of loans in the Bank’s portfolio is the creditworthiness of its borrowers. Within each category, such risk is increased or decreased, depending on prevailing economic conditions. The risk associated with real estate mortgage loans, commercial and consumer loans varies, based on employment levels, consumer confidence, fluctuations in the value of real estate and other conditions that affect the ability of borrowers to repay indebtedness. The risk associated with real estate construction loans varies, based on the supply and demand for the type of real estate under construction.

In an effort to manage the risk, the Bank’s policy gives loan amount approval limits to individual loan officers based on their position and level of experience. The Bank’s Board of Directors approves all loan relationships greater than $1 million. The President & CEO and the Senior Vice President-Loan Administrator can combine their lending limits to approve loan relationships up to $1 million. All loan relationships greater than $500 thousand are reported to the Board. The Loan Policy Committee consists of five non-management directors. The Committee approves the Bank’s Loan Policy and loans to be charged-off. It also reviews the allowance for loan loss adequacy calculation as well as the loan watch list and other management reports. The Committee meets on a quarterly basis and the Chairman of the Committee then reports to the Board of Directors.

Residential loan originations come primarily from walk-in customers, real estate brokers and builders. Commercial real estate loan originations are obtained through broker referrals, direct solicitation of developers and continued business from customers. All completed loan applications are reviewed by the Bank’s loan officers. As part of the application process, information is obtained concerning the income, financial condition, employment and credit history of the applicant. If commercial real estate is involved, information is also obtained concerning cash flow available for debt service. Loan quality is analyzed based on the Bank’s experience and credit underwriting guidelines as well as the guidelines issued by the purchasers of loans, depending on the type of loan involved. Real estate collateral is appraised by independent fee appraisers who have been pre-approved by the Senior Vice President - Loan Administrator.

In the normal course of business, the Bank makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities which are disclosed but not reflected in its annual financial statements including commitments to extend credit. At December 31, 2004, commitments to extend credit totaled $55.5 million.

Construction Lending

The Bank makes local construction loans, including residential and land acquisition and development loans.

12

Table of Contents

These loans are secured by the property under construction and the underlying land for which the loan was obtained. Construction, land and land development loans outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $42.5 million, or 13.2% of gross loans, and $23.6 million, or 9.5% of gross loans, respectively. The majority of these loans have an average life of approximately one year and reprice monthly as key rates change. The interest rate charged on some of these loans float with the market, assisting the Bank in managing interest rate risk. Construction lending entails significant additional risks, compared with residential mortgage lending. Construction loans often involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Another risk involved in construction lending is attributable to the fact that loan funds are advanced upon the security of the land or property under construction, which value is estimated prior to the completion of construction. Thus, it is more difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required to complete a project and related loan-to-value ratios. To mitigate the risks associated with construction lending, the Bank generally limits loan amounts to 80% of appraised value, in addition to analyzing the creditworthiness of its borrowers. The Bank also obtains a first lien on the property as security for its construction loans and typically requires personal guarantees from the borrower’s principal owners.

Commercial Business Lending

Commercial business loans generally have a higher degree of risk than residential mortgage loans, but typically have higher yields. Commercial business loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from cash flow from its business and are secured by business assets, such as commercial real estate, accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans is substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Furthermore, the collateral for commercial business loans may depreciate over time and generally cannot be appraised with as much precision as residential real estate. To manage these risks, the Bank generally obtains appropriate collateral and personal guarantees from the borrower’s principal owners and monitors the financial condition of its business borrowers. At December 31, 2004, commercial loans not secured by real estate totaled $37.1 million, or 11.5% of the total loan portfolio, as compared to $31.4 million, or 12.6% at December 31, 2003.

Commercial Real Estate Lending

Commercial real estate loans are secured by various types of commercial real estate typically in the Bank’s market area, including multi-family residential buildings, commercial buildings and offices, small shopping centers and churches. At December 31, 2004, commercial real estate loans aggregated $113.8 million, or 35.2% of the Bank’s gross loans, as compared to $88.1 million, or 35.5% at December 31, 2003. In its underwriting of commercial real estate, the Bank may lend, under federal regulation, up to 85% of the secured property’s appraised value, although the Bank’s loan to original appraised value ratio on such properties is typically 80% or less in many cases. Commercial real estate lending entails significant additional risk, compared with residential mortgage lending. Commercial real estate loans typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Additionally, the payment experience on loans secured by income producing properties is typically dependent on the successful operation of a business or a real estate project and thus may be subject, to a greater extent, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or in the economy, in general. The Bank’s commercial real estate loan underwriting criteria require an examination of debt service coverage ratios and the borrower’s creditworthiness, prior credit history and reputation, and the Bank typically requires personal guarantees or endorsements of the borrowers’ principal owners. The Bank also carefully evaluates the location of the collateral.

Residential Real Estate Lending

Residential lending activity may be generated by the Bank’s loan officer solicitations, referrals by real estate professionals and existing or new bank customers. Loan applications are taken by a Bank loan officer. As part of the application process, information is gathered concerning income, employment and credit history of the applicant. Loan quality is analyzed based on guidelines issued by the applicable secondary market investor. The non-conforming one-to-four family loans originated by the Bank that do not generally meet investor guidelines are underwritten using the Bank’s underwriting guidelines. The valuation of residential collateral is provided by independent fee appraisers who have been approved by the Bank’s Senior Vice President-Loan Administrator.

Typically, all fixed rate mortgage loans are originated with the intent to sell. In order to meet community needs and retain a competitive edge, the bank originates and retains non-conforming loans. At December 31, 2004, $95.0 million, or 29.4%, of the Bank’s loan portfolio consisted of one-to-four-family residential real estate loans, as compared to $71.7 million, or 28.9%, at December 31, 2003.

13

Table of Contents

In connection with residential real estate loans, the Bank requires title insurance, hazard insurance and if required, flood insurance. Flood determination letters with life of loan tracking are obtained on all federally related transactions with improvements serving as security for the transaction. The Bank does require escrows for real estate taxes and insurance for secondary market loans.

Consumer Lending

The Bank offers various secured and unsecured consumer loans, including unsecured personal loans and lines of credit, automobile loans, deposit account loans, installment and demand loans, and credit card loans. At December 31, 2004, the Bank had consumer loans including deposit overdraft balances of $31.1 million, or 9.6% of gross loans, as compared to $31.8 million, or 12.8%, at December 31, 2003. Such loans are generally made to customers with whom the Bank has a pre-existing relationship. The Bank currently originates most of its consumer loans in its geographic market area.

Consumer loans may entail greater risk than residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured, such as lines of credit, or secured by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

The underwriting standards employed by the Bank for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and an assessment of ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. The stability of the applicant’s monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, and additionally from any verifiable secondary income. Although creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes an analysis of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

General

Net interest income represents the primary source of earnings for the Company. Net interest income equals the amount by which interest income on earning assets, predominately loans and securities, exceeds interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, predominately deposits, other borrowings and trust preferred securities. The provision for loan losses and the amount of noninterest income and expense also affect net income. Changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as their respective yields and rates, are the components that impact the level of net interest income. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing tax equivalent net interest income by average earning assets. Noninterest income and expense primarily consists of income from service charges on deposit accounts; fees charged for other customer services; gains and losses from the sale of assets, including loans held for sale, securities, and premises and equipment; general and administrative expenses; and income tax expense.

Increases in net income in each of the last three years have been driven by continued growth in earning assets. In 2004, the growth in net interest income and noninterest income exceeded the growth in noninterest expense. In 2003 and 2002, net interest income also increased as the Company continued to experience favorable asset growth.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income was $13.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, which is an increase of $2.3 million or 21.2% over $11.0 million reported for the same period in 2003. This increase in net interest income can be attributed to continuing growth in average earning assets, specifically the loan portfolio. In 2003, net interest income increased $1.6 million, or 16.6%, from $9.4 million in 2002.

14

Table of Contents

Interest income as a percent of average earning assets decreased in each of the last three years from 6.74% in 2002, 6.14% in 2003, to 5.88% in 2004. Interest expense as a percent of average interest-bearing liabilities also decreased from 3.55% in 2002, 2.78% in 2003, to 2.55% in 2004. Net interest margin was 3.75% in 2002, 3.83% in 2003, and 3.84% in 2004. The interest rate spread was 3.19% in 2002, 3.36% in 2003, and 3.33% in 2004. The Company does not anticipate significant changes in net income in the next 12 months based on the interest rate sensitivity analysis discussed further in Item 7A (Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk).

The following table provides information on average earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, as well as amounts and rates of tax equivalent interest earned and interest paid. The volume and rate analysis table analyzes the changes in net interest income for the periods broken down by their rate and volume components.

15

Table of Contents

Average Balances, Income and Expense, Yields and Rates

(dollars in thousands)

Years Ending December 31,

16

Table of Contents

Volume and Rate Analysis

(in thousands)

Years Ending December 31,

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for 2004 was $810 thousand compared to $705 thousand in 2003 and $405 thousand in 2002. The amount allocated during the year to the provision for loan losses represents management’s analysis of the existing loan portfolio and related credit risks. The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s estimate of the amount required to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses reflective of the risks in the loan portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2004, net charge-offs totaled $480 thousand compared to $320 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2003. The total allowance for loan losses of $2.9 million at December 31, 2004 increased 12.9% from $2.5 million at December 31, 2003. The increases in the total allowance for loan losses are reflective of charge-off activity, changes in classified loans and growth in the loan portfolio as loans net of the allowance for loan losses increased $74.6 million, or 30.4%, from $245.6 million at December 31, 2003 to $320.2 million at December 31, 2004.

Management has determined that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. There can be no assurance, however, that additional provisions for loan losses will not be required in the future, including as a result of changes in the economic assumptions underlying management’s estimates and judgments, adverse developments in the economy, on a national basis or in the Company’s market area, or changes in the circumstances of particular borrowers.

The Bank generates a quarterly analysis of the allowance for loan losses, with the objective of quantifying portfolio risk into a dollar figure of potential losses. In addition, internal loan reviews are performed on a regular

17

Table of Contents

basis. The determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on applying qualitative and quantitative factors to each category of loans along with any estimated losses for impaired and classified loans within the particular category. The resulting sum is then combined to arrive at a total allowance for all categories. The total allowance required changes as the various types and categories of loans change as a percentage of total loans and as the amount of classified loans change. See “Critical Accounting Policies” above for additional information on the determination of the allowance for loan losses.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income increased $806 thousand or 22.2% for 2004 over 2003 compared to an increase of $1.1 million or 42.5% for 2003 over 2002. Service charges increased $342 thousand, or 14.7%, for 2004 over 2003 compared to an increase of $1.0 million, or 77.0%, for 2003 over 2002. This increase was attributable to growth in the number of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and related overdraft fees. The Company expects these service charges to remain the most significant component of noninterest income in future periods. Fees for other customer services increased $311 thousand, or 40.5%, for 2004 over 2003 compared to an increase of $138 thousand, or 21.8%, for 2003 over 2002. Transaction fees such as Visa check card, brokerage, and ATM fees contributed to the increase in fees for other customer services. Net gains on sale of property and equipment totaled $387 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2004. The majority of this gain was comprised of a property sale in April 2004. Gains on sale of loans decreased to $172 thousand in 2004 from $372 thousand in 2003 and $198 thousand in 2002 as a result of less refinance activity. The Company does not expect significant fluctuations in gains on sale of loans in future periods.

Noninterest Expense

In 2004, noninterest expenses increased $1.7 million, or 18.7%, over 2003. Salaries and employee benefits increased 15.1% for 2004 over 2003 as a result of merit increases and hiring additional employees to support business growth. Occupancy and equipment costs increased 24.3% for 2004 over 2003. This increase was a result of retail branch expansions in Shenandoah County and the City of Winchester. During the year, the Bank constructed and opened a new retail branch office in Mount Jackson to expand further into Shenandoah County. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Bank opened the Winchester Financial Center, which serves the Winchester-Frederick County market. Legal and professional fees increased to $395 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to $216 thousand for the same period in 2003 as a result of legal costs incurred from legal proceedings discussed further in Part I, Item 3. In 2003, noninterest expenses increased $1.9 million, or 25.9%, over 2002. This increase was also attributable to the growth of the Company, including hiring additional personnel.

Income Taxes