UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-24302
COLUMBIA BANCORP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 52-1545782 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
7168 Columbia Gateway Drive, Columbia, Maryland 21046
(Address of principal executive offices)
(410) 423-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes x No ¨
[cover page 1 of 2 pages]
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share: |
|||
Market value held by non-affiliates based on the closing sales price at June 30, 2004 |
$ | 171,744,459 |
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share: | ||
Shares outstanding at March 11, 2005 |
6,905,097 |
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Portions of Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, incorporated by reference into Part III.
[cover page 2 of 2 pages]
PAGE | ||||
PART I |
||||
Item 1 - |
8 | |||
Item 2 - |
14 | |||
Item 3 - |
17 | |||
Item 4 - |
17 | |||
PART II |
||||
Item 5 - |
17 | |||
Item 6 - |
19 | |||
Item 7 - |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
20 | ||
Item 7A - |
38 | |||
Item 8 - |
43 | |||
Item 9 - |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
73 | ||
Item 9A - |
73 | |||
Item 9B - |
73 | |||
PART III |
||||
Item 10 - |
74 | |||
Item 11 - |
76 | |||
Item 12 - |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
76 | ||
Item 13 - |
76 | |||
Item 14 - |
76 | |||
PART IV |
||||
Item 15 - |
76 | |||
82 |
6
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and certain information incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than statements that are purely historical, are forward-looking statements. Statements that include the use of terminology such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, estimates and similar expressions also identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements are based on Columbia Bancorps current intent, belief and expectations Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include, but are not limited to:
Part I. Item 3. Legal Proceedings:
| Statement regarding the impact on the Company of routine legal proceedings. |
Part II. Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:
| Statement regarding managements expectations toward payment of quarterly dividend on common stock. |
| Statements regarding normal range of cash dividends paid on common stock. |
Part II. Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:
| Statements regarding loan growth in real estate development and construction and commercial loan portfolios in 2005. |
| Statements regarding title company account volatility. |
| Statement regarding 2005 certificate of deposit pricing strategy. |
| Statements regarding challenges facing management in terms of interest rates, growth in net interest income and overall management of the net interest margin. |
| Statements regarding volatility in mortgage refinancing activity. |
| Statements regarding risk factors to be considered when evaluating an investment in the Companys Common Stock. |
Part II. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk:
| Statements regarding the Companys ability to limit exposure to interest rate risk. |
| Statements regarding factors that influence demand for real estate loans. |
| Statements regarding future revenue improvements. |
| Statements regarding the sufficiency of the Companys allowance for credit losses. |
Part II. Item 8. Note 3. Investments:
| Statement regarding anticipated changes in the fair value of securities in relation to market rates. |
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements because of interest rate fluctuations, a deterioration of economic conditions in the Baltimore/Washington metropolitan area, a downturn in the real estate market, losses from impaired loans, an increase in nonperforming assets, potential exposure to environmental laws, changes in federal and state bank laws and regulations, the highly competitive nature of the banking industry, a loss of key personnel, changes in accounting standards and other risks described in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Existing and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. Columbia Bancorp undertakes no obligation to update or revise the information contained in this Annual Report whether as a result of new information, future events or circumstances or otherwise. Past results of operations may not be indicative of future results. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Investment Considerations Risk Factors in this Annual Report and in other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q to be filed by the Company in 2005.
7
PART I
General
Columbia Bancorp (the Company), a bank holding company, was incorporated in November 1987 under the laws of Maryland and registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company organized The Columbia Bank (the Bank) as a Maryland trust company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company in May 1988. The Bank currently accounts for substantially all of the Companys assets. The deposits of the Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Bank is headquartered in Columbia, Maryland and as of December 31, 2004 had a total of twenty-four branch locations in Maryland with ten branch locations in Howard County; four branch locations in Baltimore County; two branch locations in Baltimore City; five branch locations in Prince Georges County; and three branch locations in Montgomery County. The Bank also has mortgage and commercial loan origination and investment services offices in Howard, Baltimore, Prince Georges and Montgomery Counties. Wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Bank include McAlpine Enterprises, Inc., Howard I, LLC and Howard II, LLC, which are used primarily to manage properties acquired through foreclosure, and Columbia Leasing, Inc., which is an inactive commercial leasing company. During 2004, the Company formed Columbia Bancorp Statutory Trust I and Columbia Bancorp Statutory Trust II for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities. These trust subsidiaries are not consolidated with the Company, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. At December 31, 2004, the Company had total assets of $1.2 billion, total loans, net of unearned income, of $950.2 million, total deposits of $912.6 million and stockholders equity of $92.3 million.
The Bank is an independent, community bank that seeks to provide personal attention and professional financial services to its customers while offering virtually all of the banking services of larger competitors. Our customers are primarily individuals and small and medium-sized businesses. The Banks business philosophy includes offering informed and courteous service, local and timely decision-making, flexible and reasonable operating procedures and consistently applied credit policies.
The executive offices of the Company and the principal office of the Bank are located at 7168 Columbia Gateway Drive, Columbia, Maryland 21046, telephone number (410) 423-8000. The Company files quarterly and annual reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Forms 10-Q and 10-K, respectively, proxy materials on Schedule 14A and current reports on Form 8-K. The Company makes available, free of charge, all of these reports, as well as any amendments, through the Companys Internet site as soon as is reasonably practicable after they are filed electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.thecolumbiabank.com. To access the SEC reports, click on Investor Relations Corporate Profile Documents. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy materials and information statements at http://sec.gov. In addition, the Company will provide paper copies of filings free of charge upon written request. The Companys website also makes available Corporate Governance material, including such documents as the Code of Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of several of the committees of the Board of Directors. To access this section of our website, click on Investor Relations Corporate Governance.
Services of the Bank
The Bank provides comprehensive and service-intensive commercial and retail banking services primarily to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses. The following types of services are offered by the Bank:
Commercial Services:
| Loans, including a wide range of demand, term, and time loans, loans for real estate acquisition, development and construction, and equipment, inventory and accounts receivable financing. Also, the Bank is a Preferred SBA lender and provides government contract financing. |
8
| Cash management, including automatic overnight investment of funds. |
| Certificates of deposit and other interest-bearing accounts. |
| Direct deposit of payroll. |
| Letters of credit. |
| Internet banking. |
| Electronic statements with imaged items. |
Retail Services:
| Transaction accounts, including checking and NOW accounts. |
| Savings accounts. |
| Certificates of deposit. |
| Individual retirement accounts. |
| 24-hour automated teller machines with access to major network systems. |
| 24-hour telephone banking. |
| Internet banking with imaged items. |
| Electronic statements with imaged items. |
| Installment and home equity loans and lines of credit. |
| Residential construction and first mortgage loans. |
| VISA® credit and debit cards (credit cards provided through third-party affiliation). |
| Travelers checks and safe deposit boxes. |
| Investment services (provided through third-party affiliation). |
The Bank does not now exercise general trust powers.
Lending Activities
General. The Companys primary source of income is interest paid on loans. At December 31, 2004, the Companys loan portfolio, net of unearned income, totaled $950.2 million, representing 80.6% of its total assets of $1.2 billion. The principal categories of loans in the Companys loan portfolio are real estate development and construction, commercial, residential real estate, commercial real estate and consumer.
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the Companys loans by major categories as of December 31, 2004.
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMOUNT |
PERCENT |
||||
Real estate development and construction (1) |
$ | 345,375 | 36.3 | % | ||
Commercial |
226,763 | 23.9 | ||||
Real estate mortgage: |
||||||
Residential |
17,272 | 1.8 | ||||
Commercial |
163,985 | 17.3 | ||||
Consumer (2) |
196,198 | 20.6 | ||||
Other |
668 | 0.1 | ||||
Total loans |
$ | 950,261 | 100.0 | % | ||
(1) | Loans to individuals for the purchase of residential building lots and the construction of primary personal residences represented $63.9 million. |
(2) | Includes $190.3 million in retail loans secured by the borrowers principal residences in the form of second mortgages and home equity lines of credit. |
9
Real Estate Development and Construction Loans. Real estate development and construction loans consisted of the following at December 31, 2004:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMOUNT |
PERCENT |
||||
Residential construction (1) |
$ | 139,417 | 40.4 | % | ||
Residential land development |
88,385 | 25.6 | ||||
Land acquisition (2) |
69,238 | 20.0 | ||||
Commercial construction |
48,335 | 14.0 | ||||
Total loans |
$ | 345,375 | 100.0 | % | ||
(1) | Includes $49.0 million of loans to individuals for construction of primary personal residences. |
(2) | Includes $14.9 million of loans to individuals for the purchase of residential building lots, $33.2 million of loans for the acquisition of property for residential development, and $21.1 million of loans for the acquisition of property for commercial development. |
The Company makes residential real estate development and construction loans generally to provide interim financing on property during the development and construction period. Borrowers include builders, developers and persons who will ultimately occupy the single-family dwelling. The Company disburses residential real estate development and construction loan funds periodically as pre-specified stages of completion are confirmed based upon site inspections. Interest rates on these loans are usually adjustable.
Residential construction loans constitute the largest component of the real estate development and construction loan portfolio, representing primarily loans for the construction of single-family dwellings. At December 31, 2004, loans to individuals for the construction of primary personal residences accounted for $49.0 million of the $139.4 million residential construction loan portfolio. These loans are typically secured by the property under construction, frequently include additional collateral (such as a second mortgage on the borrowers present home), and commonly have maturities of nine to eighteen months. The remaining $90.4 million of residential construction loans represented loans to residential builders. Approximately 53% of the units under construction were for residential homes for which a binding sales contract existed and the prospective buyers had been pre-qualified for permanent mortgage financing by either third-party lenders (mortgage companies or other financial institutions) or the Company. The Company attempts to obtain the permanent mortgage loan under terms, conditions and documentation standards that permit the sale of the mortgage loan in the secondary mortgage loan market. The Companys practice is to immediately sell substantially all residential mortgage loans in the secondary market with servicing released. The Company does not retain servicing obligations on such loans.
Loans for the development of residential land represented the second largest component of the real estate development and construction loan portfolio at December 31, 2004, totaling $88.4 million or 25.6% of the portfolio. Generally, development loans are extended when evidence is provided that the lots under development will be or have been sold to builders satisfactory to the Company. These loans are extended for a period of time sufficient to allow for the clearing and grading of the land and the installation of water, sewer and roads, generally for a period of up to 36 months. Residential land development loans generally carry a loan to value ratio not to exceed 75% of the value of the project as completed.
Land acquisition loans comprised a significant portion of the Companys real estate development and construction loan portfolio, totaling $69.2 million, or 20.0% of the total portfolio at December 31, 2004. The category is comprised of $14.9 million of loans to individuals for the purchase of residential building lots, $21.1 million of loans for the acquisition of property for commercial development and $33.2 million of loans for the acquisition of property by builders for residential development.
The Company also makes commercial construction loans, which totaled $48.3 million, or 14.0% of the real estate development and construction portfolio at December 31, 2004. These loans are generally extended to borrowers who are experienced in the construction field and who possess adequate financial resources in relation to their commitments and obligations. The underwriting process is designed to confirm that the project will be economically feasible and financially viable. It is generally evaluated as though the Company will provide permanent financing.
10
The Company has limited its risk in this area of lending by monitoring development and construction loans with on-site inspections and controlling disbursements on loans in process. Development and construction loans are secured by the properties under development or construction and personal guarantees are typically obtained. Further, to assure that reliance is not placed solely upon the value of the underlying collateral, the Company considers the financial condition and reputation of the borrower and any guarantors, the amount of the borrowers equity in the project, independent appraisals, cost estimates and pre-construction sales information.
Commercial Loans. At December 31, 2004, $226.8 million, or 23.9%, of the Companys total loan portfolio consisted of commercial business loans. The commercial loan portfolio includes secured and unsecured term loans and lines of credit extended to small and mid-sized local businesses. The Companys lending policy requires that each loan be evaluated for the adequacy of the repayment sources at the time of approval. The Company closely monitors the financial condition and cash flow of commercial borrowers, in part by reviewing corporate financial statements, personal financial statements and income tax returns. The frequency of submissions of required information depends upon the size and complexity of the credit and the collateral that secures the loan. Collateral is generally required to provide the Company with an additional source of repayment in the event of default by a commercial borrower. The collateral requirements, including the amount and type of the collateral, vary from loan to loan depending on the financial strength of the borrower, but generally may include accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or other assets. It is also the Companys general policy to obtain personal guarantees from the principals of the commercial loan borrowers.
The following table demonstrates the diversity of the Companys commercial loan portfolio customer base. The largest industry represented by the Companys commercial borrowers, comprising 20.3% of the commercial loan portfolio, is the construction industry, which includes land development and subdivision, residential, commercial and industrial construction, and trade contractors. The second largest industry is professional and financial services, which comprises 17.2% of the total portfolio. This diverse group includes a broad range of businesses, including law firms, accounting firms, engineering services, computer programming and armored car services.
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMOUNT |
PERCENT |
||||
Construction |
$ | 46,104 | 20.3 | % | ||
Professional and financial services |
38,947 | 17.2 | ||||
Real estate management |
25,939 | 11.4 | ||||
Wholesale trade |
17,212 | 7.6 | ||||
Manufacturing |
10,670 | 4.7 | ||||
Health care / social assistance |
10,047 | 4.4 | ||||
Educational services |
9,893 | 4.4 | ||||
Retail trade |
9,654 | 4.3 | ||||
Repair / maintenance services |
8,534 | 3.8 | ||||
Food services / drinking establishments |
8,202 | 3.6 | ||||
Other industries (a) |
41,561 | 18.3 | ||||
Total commercial loans |
$ | 226,763 | 100.0 | % | ||
(a) | No other single industry comprises more than 3.5% of the total. |
Commercial Real Estate Mortgage Loans. The Company also originates mortgage loans secured by commercial real estate. At December 31, 2004, $164.0 million, or 17.3% of the Companys total loan portfolio, consisted of commercial mortgage loans. Such loans generally involve investment properties secured by office buildings, retail buildings, warehouse and general-purpose business space. Other commercial mortgages consist of owner occupied properties. Although terms and amortization periods vary, the Companys commercial mortgages generally have maturities or repricing opportunities of five years or less. The following table describes the collateral underlying the commercial real estate mortgage loan portfolio at December 31, 2004:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMOUNT |
PERCENT |
||||
Investment property: |
||||||
Office buildings |
$ | 27,016 | 16.5 | % | ||
Retail |
19,638 | 12.0 | ||||
Residential 5 or more units |
14,236 | 8.7 | ||||
Other real estate |
9,637 | 5.9 | ||||
Residential 1 to 4 family |
7,937 | 4.8 | ||||
Retirement community / assisted living |
5,699 | 3.5 | ||||
Other investment properties (a) |
17,441 | 10.6 | ||||
Total investment property |
101,604 | 62.0 | ||||
Owner occupied property: |
||||||
Warehouse |
13,396 | 8.2 | ||||
Office building |
12,866 | 7.8 | ||||
Church / private school |
12,374 | 7.5 | ||||
Recreational properties |
6,559 | 4.0 | ||||
Retail |
6,397 | 3.9 | ||||
Other owner occupied properties (a) |
10,789 | 6.6 | ||||
Total owner occupied property |
62,381 | 38.0 | ||||
Total commercial real estate mortgage loans |
$ | 163,985 | 100.0 | % | ||
(a) | No other classification exceeds 3.5% of the total. |
11
The Company seeks to reduce the risks associated with commercial mortgage lending by generally lending in its market area, using conservative loan-to-value ratios (typically 75% to 80%) and obtaining periodic financial statements and tax returns from borrowers to perform annual loan reviews. It is also the Companys general policy to obtain personal guarantees from the principals of the borrowers and to underwrite the business entity from a cash flow perspective.
Consumer Loans. At December 31, 2004, $196.2 million, or 20.6%, of the Companys total loan portfolio consisted of consumer loans. The Company offers a variety of consumer loans in order to provide a full range of financial services to its customers; however, outstanding balances are primarily concentrated in home equity and second mortgage loans, which totaled $171.6 million and $18.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004.
Home equity loans and lines of credit are originated by the Company for typically up to 90% of the appraised value, less the amount of any existing prior liens on the property. Home equity loans have terms of fifteen to thirty years and the interest rates are generally adjustable. The Company secures these loans with mortgages on the homes (typically a second mortgage). The second mortgage loans originated by the Company have terms ranging from ten to thirty years. They generally carry a fixed rate of interest for the entire term or a fixed rate of interest for the first five years, repricing every five years thereafter at a predetermined spread to the prime rate of interest.
Residential Real Estate Mortgage Loans. The Company originates adjustable and fixed-rate residential mortgage loans in order to provide a full range of products to its customers. The Company generally offers mortgage loans under terms, conditions and documentation that permit their sale in the secondary mortgage market. The Companys practice is to immediately sell substantially all residential mortgage loans in the secondary market with servicing released. The Company does not retain servicing obligations on such loans. At December 31, 2004, $17.3 million, or 1.8%, of the Companys total loan portfolio consisted of residential mortgage loans.
For any loans retained by the Company, title insurance insuring the priority of its mortgage lien, as well as general liability, fire and extended coverage casualty insurance protecting the properties securing the loans are required. The Company may require borrowers to advance funds, with each monthly payment of principal and interest, to a loan escrow account from which the Company makes disbursements for items such as real estate taxes, hazard insurance premiums and mortgage insurance premiums. Outside appraisers approved by the Company appraise the properties securing all of the residential mortgage loans originated by the Company.
Other Loans. At December 31, 2004, other loans totaled $668,000, consisting primarily of unscheduled overdrafts of the Companys retail and commercial customers.
Market
The Company considers its core markets to be the communities within the Baltimore/Washington corridor, particularly the counties of Howard, Baltimore, Montgomery and Prince Georges and Baltimore City. The Company engages in lending activities that take place in a broader geographic footprint, which includes not only the communities of the Baltimore/Washington corridor, but other Maryland counties, the District of Columbia and targeted markets in contiguous states. The following table shows the distribution of the Companys loans and customer funding throughout its core market and the surrounding area as of December 31, 2004:
LOANS |
CUSTOMER FUNDING |
|||||||||||
COUNTIES / REGION |
AMOUNT |
PERCENT |
AMOUNT |
PERCENT |
||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) | ||||||||||||
Core market |
$ | 647,618 | 68.2 | % | $ | 804,040 | 78.4 | % | ||||
Other Maryland markets (1) |
245,313 | 25.8 | 144,989 | 14.1 | ||||||||
Other |
57,330 | 6.0 | 76,374 | 7.5 | ||||||||
Totals |
$ | 950,261 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,025,403 | 100.0 | % | ||||
(1) | Includes the District of Columbia. |
12
Competition
While promotional activities emphasize the many advantages of dealing with a locally-run institution closely attuned to the needs of its community, the Company faces strong competition in all areas of its operations. This competition comes from entities operating in the Baltimore/Washington metropolitan area, which includes offices of most banks operating in Maryland. Its most direct competition for deposits comes from other commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations and credit unions operating in the Baltimore/Washington marketplace. The Company also competes for deposits with money market mutual funds and with larger banks for cash management customers. The Company competes with banking entities, mortgage banking companies, and other institutional lenders for loans. The competition for loans varies from time to time depending on certain factors. These factors include, among others, the general availability of lendable funds and credit, general and local economic conditions, current interest rate levels, conditions in the mortgage market and other factors that are not readily predictable.
Current federal law allows the acquisition of banks by bank holding companies nationwide. Further, federal and Maryland law permit interstate banking. Recent legislation has broadened the extent to which financial services companies, such as investment banks and insurance companies, may control commercial banks. As a consequence of these developments, competition in the Banks principal market may increase, and a further consolidation of financial institutions in Maryland may occur.
Regulation
The Company is registered as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. As such, the Company is subject to regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve Board, and is required to file periodic reports and any additional information that the Federal Reserve Board may require. The Bank Holding Company Act imposes certain restrictions upon the Company regarding the acquisition of stock or assets of any bank of which it is not already the majority owner or, with certain exceptions, of any company engaged in non-banking activities.
The Bank is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Bank Commissioner of the State of Maryland and the FDIC. Asset growth, deposits, reserves, investments, loans, consumer law compliance, issuance of securities, payment of dividends, establishment of branches, mergers and consolidations, changes in control, electronic funds transfer, management practices and other aspects of operations are subject to regulation by the appropriate federal and state supervisory authorities. The Bank is also subject to various regulatory requirements of the Federal Reserve Board applicable to FDIC-insured depository institutions.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 authorizes a bank holding company that meets specified conditions to become a financial holding company and thereby engage in a broader array of financial activities than previously permitted. Such activities can include insurance underwriting and investment banking. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act also authorizes banks to engage through financial subsidiaries in certain of the activities permitted for financial holding companies. To date, the Company has not elected financial holding company status.
The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (the PATRIOT Act) requires financial institutions to develop a customer identification plan that includes procedures to:
| Collect identifying information about customers opening a deposit or loan account. |
| Verify customer identity. |
| Maintain records of the information used to verify the customers identity. |
| Determine whether the customer appears on any list of suspected terrorists or terrorist organizations. |
Under the provisions of the PATRIOT Act, the Bank is also required from time to time to search its customer data base for the names of known or suspected terrorists as provided by the government.
Due to the extensive regulation of the commercial banking business in the United States, the Company is particularly susceptible to changes in federal and state legislation and regulations.
13
Governmental Monetary Policies and Economic Controls
The Company is affected by monetary policies of regulatory agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates the national money supply in order to mitigate recessionary and inflationary pressures. Among the techniques available to the Federal Reserve Board are: engaging in open market transactions in U. S. Government securities, changing the discount rate on bank borrowings, changing reserve requirements against bank deposits, prohibiting the payment of interest on demand deposits, and imposing conditions on time and savings deposits. These techniques are used in varying combinations to influence the overall growth of bank loans, investments and deposits. Their use may also affect interest rates charged on loans or paid on deposits. The effect of governmental policies on the earnings of the Company cannot be predicted. However, the Companys earnings will be impacted by movement in interest rates, as discussed in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Employees
At December 31, 2004, the Company and the Bank had 362 employees, of whom 71 were officers, 231 were full-time employees and 60 were part-time employees. The Company believes it has a favorable relationship with its employees. See Part III, Item 10 for a description of the executive officers of the Company.
The Company owned the following properties, which had a combined book value of $3.3 million at December 31, 2004:
Location |
Description | |
Ellicott City |
Full-service branch. | |
Long Gate |
Full-service branch; subject to a ground lease expiring February 2037, assuming that the Company exercises all extension options. | |
Timonium |
Full-service branch; subject to a ground lease expiring October 2029, assuming that the Company exercises all extension options. | |
Columbia Town Center |
Detached drive-through branch; subject to a ground lease expiring May 2013, assuming that the Company exercises all extension options. | |
River Hill |
Detached drive-through branch; subject to a ground lease expiring November 2017, assuming that the Company exercises all extension options. | |
Capitol Heights |
Full-service branch. |
14
The Company leased the following facilities at an aggregate annual rental of $2.5 million as of December 31, 2004:
Location |
Description |
Lease Expiration Date* | ||
Beltsville |
Full-service branch | May 2021 | ||
Bethesda |
Full-service branch | September 2006 | ||
Blakehurst |
Limited-service branch | October 2008 | ||
Bowie |
Full-service branch | April 2017 | ||
Clinton |
Full-service branch | December 2008 | ||
Columbia Town Center |
Full-service branch and investment services office | May 2013 | ||
Cross Keys |
Full-service branch | November 2005 (1) | ||
Edenwald |
Limited-service branch | December 2008 | ||
Gateway Corporate Park |
Administrative, operational and lending offices | June 2013 | ||
Greenbelt |
Full-service branch and commercial banking office | May 2006 | ||
Harmony Hall |
Limited-service branch | November 2005 (1) | ||
Harpers Choice |
Full-service branch | March 2010 | ||
Heaver Plaza |
Full-service branch and commercial banking office | February 2011 | ||
Oakland Mills |
Full-service branch | September 2023 |
15
Location |
Description |
Lease Expiration Date* | ||
River Hill |
Full-service branch | November 2017 | ||
Rockville |
Full-service branch and commercial banking office | November 2008 | ||
Roland Park Place |
Limited-service branch | January 2007 | ||
Vantage House |
Limited-service branch | June 2009 | ||
West Friendship |
Full-service branch | December 2012 | ||
White Flint |
Full-service branch | December 2007 (2) | ||
Wilde Lake |
Full-service branch | June 2012 |
* | Expiration date, assuming that the Company exercises all extension options. |
(1) | The Company is currently in negotiation to extend these leases. |
(2) | Subsequent to December 31, 2004, in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement, the landlord notified the Company that the lease would be terminated February 2006. The Company will begin investigating relocation possibilities. |
16
The Company may be party to legal actions that are routine and incidental to its business. In managements opinion, the outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material impact on the results of operations or financial position of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2004.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Companys Common Stock is traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (Nasdaq®) National Market tier of The Nasdaq Stock MarketSM under the symbol CBMD.
As a depository institution whose deposits are insured by the FDIC, the Bank may not pay dividends or distribute any of its capital assets while it remains in default on any assessment due the FDIC. The Bank currently is not in default under any of its obligations to the FDIC. As a commercial bank under the Maryland Financial Institution Law, the Bank may declare cash dividends from undivided profits or, with the prior approval of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation, out of surplus in excess of 100% of its required capital stock, and after providing for due or accrued expenses, losses, interest and taxes.
The Company and the Bank, in declaring and paying dividends, are also limited insofar as minimum capital requirements of regulatory authorities must be maintained. The Company and the Bank currently comply with such capital requirements.
Dividends declared per share on the Companys common stock were $.62 in 2004, $.525 in 2003, and $.455 in 2002, representing a payout ratio of 33.32% in 2004, 31.51% in 2003 and 29.72% in 2002. The dividend payout ratio is the result of dividing the amount of dividends paid by net income. Management believes a normal payout ratio to be in a range between 25% and 40% of net income.
On December 22, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Bank authorized a cash dividend of $1.4 million to be paid to the Company on January 20, 2005. In addition, on December 22, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a $.17 per share cash dividend to shareholders of common stock of record on January 7, 2005, payable January 20, 2005.
During 2004, the Company repurchased and retired 93,546 shares of common stock at an average price of $28.56 per share, pursuant to the Companys stock repurchase program approved in October 2000. During 2002, the Company repurchased and retired 10,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $15.82 per share, pursuant to the Companys 2000 stock repurchase program. No stock was purchased under this program in 2003. At December 31, 2004, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to 320,000 additional shares under this program. The excess of the purchase price over the par value of shares repurchased is applied to reduce additional paid-in capital.
17
The following table presents high and low sale prices and dividends per share of the Companys Common Stock for the periods indicated.
LOW |
HIGH |
DIVIDENDS DECLARED | |||||||
2004: |
|||||||||
Fourth quarter |
$ | 28.25 | $ | 37.49 | $ | .17 | |||
Third quarter |
26.50 | 30.10 | .15 | ||||||
Second quarter |
28.05 | 32.00 | .15 | ||||||
First quarter |
29.00 | 32.86 | .15 | ||||||
2003: |
|||||||||
Fourth quarter |
$ | 27.21 | $ | 32.49 | $ | .150 | |||
Third quarter |
23.96 | 29.67 | .125 | ||||||
Second quarter |
22.41 | 26.00 | .125 | ||||||
First quarter |
21.35 | 25.32 | .125 |
As of December 31, 2004, there were 935 common stockholders of record holding an aggregate of 7,114,267 shares. The Company believes there to be in excess of 3,200 beneficial owners of the Companys Common Stock.
The following table presents the number of shares of the Companys Common Stock that the Company repurchased during the quarter ended December 31, 2004 under the October 2000 stock repurchase plan and the average price paid per share purchased.
PERIOD |
TOTAL SHARES PURCHASED (1) |
AVERAGE PRICE PAID PER SHARE |
TOTAL SHARES PURCHASED AS PART OF PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED PROGRAM |
MAXIMUM # OF SHARES THAT MAY YET BE PURCHASED UNDER THE PROGRAM (1) | |||||
October 1 October 31, 2004 |
| $ | | | 328,204 | ||||
November 1 November 30, 2004 |
8,200 | 30.93 | 8,200 | 320,004 | |||||
December 1 December 31, 2004 |
| | | 320,004 | |||||
8,200 | $ | 30.93 | 8,200 | 320,004 | |||||
(1) | All share purchases were made pursuant to the stock repurchase plan announced in October 2000, authorizing the purchase of up to 500,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock. The plan has no expiration date. |
In February 2005, the Company repurchased 218,345 shares of common stock in a private transaction with an unaffiliated third party at $32.20 per share under the 2000 stock repurchase plan at a total cost of $7.0 million.
18
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||||
Consolidated Income Statement Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 57,546 | $ | 51,403 | $ | 52,566 | $ | 58,061 | $ | 58,917 | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
11,963 | 10,736 | 15,479 | 23,983 | 24,176 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
45,583 | 40,667 | 37,087 | 34,078 | 34,741 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
728 | 1,170 | 835 | 1,534 | 3,423 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
44,855 | 39,497 | 36,252 | 32,544 | 31,318 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
6,798 | 8,963 | 7,945 | 5,930 | 3,960 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
31,045 | 29,970 | 27,166 | 26,192 | 27,209 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
20,608 | 18,490 | 17,031 | 12,282 | 8,069 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
7,323 | 6,586 | 6,160 | 4,100 | 2,848 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 13,285 | $ | 11,904 | $ | 10,871 | $ | 8,182 | $ | 5,221 | ||||||||||
Net income before merger-related expenses (b) |
$ | 13,285 | $ | 11,904 | $ | 10,871 | $ | 8,182 | $ | 6,796 | ||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data, at year-end: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
$ | 1,179,006 | $ | 1,029,255 | $ | 982,002 | $ | 849,649 | $ | 812,650 | ||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income |
950,170 | 835,484 | 664,826 | 602,087 | 539,051 | |||||||||||||||
Deposits |
912,578 | 787,608 | 730,613 | 638,001 | 630,484 | |||||||||||||||
Total customer funding (a) |
1,025,403 | 887,930 | 865,926 | 734,453 | 693,025 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
92,348 | 85,449 | 76,923 | 69,362 | 64,520 | |||||||||||||||
Per Share Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shares of common stock outstanding, at year-end (in thousands) |
7,114 | 7,171 | 7,110 | 7,105 | 7,150 | |||||||||||||||
Net income: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.86 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.15 | $ | 0.73 | ||||||||||
Diluted |
1.80 | 1.62 | 1.50 | 1.13 | 0.73 | |||||||||||||||
Net income before merger-related expenses (b): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
1.86 | 1.67 | 1.53 | 1.15 | 0.95 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
1.80 | 1.62 | 1.50 | 1.13 | 0.94 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
0.62 | 0.53 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.37 | |||||||||||||||
Tangible book value, at year-end |
12.98 | 11.92 | 10.82 | 9.76 | 9.02 | |||||||||||||||
Performance and Capital Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets |
1.21 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.01 | % | 0.71 | % | ||||||||||
Return on average assets before merger-related expenses (b) |
1.21 | 1.22 | 1.20 | 1.01 | 0.93 | |||||||||||||||
Return on average stockholders equity |
14.88 | 14.63 | 14.77 | 12.11 | 8.36 | |||||||||||||||
Return on average stockholders equity before merger-related expenses (b) |
14.88 | 14.63 | 14.77 | 12.11 | 10.89 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (c) |
4.44 | 4.42 | 4.37 | 4.52 | 5.13 | |||||||||||||||
Average stockholders equity to average total assets |
8.11 | 8.33 | 8.11 | 8.31 | 8.51 | |||||||||||||||
Year-end capital to year-end risk-weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 |
9.74 | 9.28 | 9.84 | 9.92 | 10.48 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
10.85 | 10.45 | 10.97 | 11.07 | 11.62 | |||||||||||||||
Year-end Tier 1 leverage ratio |
8.76 | 8.43 | 7.98 | 8.42 | 8.37 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared to net income |
33.32 | 31.51 | 29.72 | 35.77 | 50.70 | |||||||||||||||
Asset Quality Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses, at year-end, to: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans, net of unearned income |
1.22 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.30 | % | ||||||||||
Nonperforming and past-due loans |
1,795.81 | 1,123.24 | 1,209.17 | 198.17 | 158.64 | |||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average total loans, net of unearned income |
| (0.11 | ) | | 0.09 | 0.50 | ||||||||||||||
Nonperforming, restructured and past-due loans to total loans, net of unearned income, at year-end |
0.07 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.67 | 0.82 | |||||||||||||||
Nonperforming assets and past-due loans to total assets, at year-end |
0.05 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 0.91 |
(a) | Customer funding represents deposits plus other short-term borrowings from customers. |
(b) | Excludes merger-related expenses of $2.3 million in 2000 relating to the merger of Suburban Bancshares, Inc. and Suburban Bank with and into Columbia Bancorp and The Columbia Bank, effective March 8, 2000. |
(c) | Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income, determined on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, to total average interest-earning assets. |
19
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
The Company continued to build upon its strong past performance achieving another year of record earnings in 2004. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $13.3 million, or $1.80 per diluted share, representing an increase of 11.6% over the $11.9 million, or $1.62 per diluted share reported for the comparable period in 2003. The Companys return on average equity improved to 14.88% for 2004 from 14.63% for 2003. Return on average assets was 1.21% for 2004, compared to 1.22% for 2003.
The past year was a great success in many respects; however, there were several factors that were key to the overall strength in the Companys performance. Loan growth, combined with a stable net interest margin and moderate increases in noninterest expenses were critical to the Companys success during 2004. Equally important was asset quality, as the Company realized its second consecutive year of net loan loss recoveries.
Loan demand throughout the Companys primary service area during 2004 resulted in an increase in total loans outstanding of $114.4 million or 13.7% at December 31, 2004 compared to balances at December 31, 2003. The Company continued to focus on its niche in the residential construction and residential land acquisition and development markets during the year as the local economy remained strong and the interest rate environment was favorable to business expansion. The result was a $61.8 million or 21.8% increase to $345.4 million in real estate development and construction loans outstanding at December 31, 2004 as compared to December 31, 2003. Total commercial real estate loans also increased 14.1% to $164.0 million and retail loans, primarily consisting of home equity loans and personal loans secured by second mortgages, also grew by 15.9% to $196.2 million at December 31, 2004. While the Baltimore/Washington Corridor provides a strong and opportunistic market, the Companys niche allows it to effectively compete not only in the counties of the Baltimore/Washington corridor, but other Maryland counties, the District of Columbia and targeted markets in contiguous states. Historically, strength in the residential real estate market has been cyclical and influenced by numerous external forces. Therefore, the Company believes future demand for real estate loans will be largely influenced by interest rates and general economic conditions.
The net interest margin is a critical component affecting the performance of the Company. During 2004, the Federal Reserve increased its targeted federal funds rate by 125 basis points during the period June 30, 2004 through December 31, 2004. The Companys fully tax-equivalent net interest margin increased slightly to 4.44% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 as compared to 4.42% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003. A relatively constant average cost of funds year over year was achieved, in large part, due to the Companys continued focus on funding loan growth with customer-based funding sources. These sources are principally retail and commercial deposits and also short-term borrowings from customers in the form of commercial paper and repurchase agreements. This funding emphasis is significant as growth of the Company is primarily achieved through core products and services. Equally significant is the Companys ability to manage the overall cost of funds by attracting and maintaining lower cost, relationship-based funding. Total customer funding, including deposits, of $1.03 billion at December 31, 2004, represents a 15.5% or $137.5 million increase compared to December 31, 2003 balances. An increase in total deposits of 15.9% or $125.0 million to $912.6 million at December 31, 2004 compared to December 31, 2003 contributed to the overall increase in total customer funding. Growth in noninterest-bearing demand deposits of 24.1% provided 36.2%, or $49.8 million, of the increase in total customer funding. Certificates of deposit also increased $72.8 million, or 24.7%, during 2004.
The Company experienced a decline in noninterest income during 2004 primarily due to a decrease in residential mortgage refinancing activity relative to 2003 and 2002 production levels. Gains and fees on the sales of mortgage loans increased from $2.1 million in 2002 to $3.0 million in 2003. However, gains and fees on the sales of mortgage loans decreased to $1.4 million in 2004. Noninterest income was also impacted by a $276,000 decline in fees charged for services as the volume of overdraft account charges decreased during the year and other income decreased $373,000 due to non-recurring fees recognized upon the prepayment of certain large lending relationships during 2003.
The Company continued to leverage its overhead structure by limiting the increase in total noninterest expenses to $1.1 million, or 3.6%, for 2004 as compared to 2003, while operating income (net interest income plus noninterest income) increased $2.8 million or 5.5%. The increase in noninterest expense during the year included: (i) an increase of $480,000, or 2.9%, in salaries and employee benefits; (ii) an increase in occupancy costs of $132,000, or 3.5%, reflecting normal escalations in lease payments and costs to maintain business properties; (iii) an increase in professional fees of $282,000, or 42.5%, primarily reflecting added consulting, legal and audit expenses related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance; and (iv) an increase of $321,000 in other noninterest expenses due to added costs incurred to support increases in loan and deposit processing volumes.
While the Company continued to experience growth in its loan portfolio, asset quality remained very solid as evidenced by a reduction in nonperforming assets and past due loans to $645,000 at December 31, 2004. As a percent of total assets, non-performing assets and past due loans at December 31, 2004 were .05% compared to .09% at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004, the allowance for credit losses totaled $11.6 million, or 1.22% of total loans, compared to $10.8 million, or 1.30% of loans, at December 31, 2003. The Company recorded net recoveries $27,000 during 2004 and $819,000 during 2003.
The discussion that follows provides further detailed analysis regarding the Companys financial condition and results of operations. It is intended to assist readers in their analysis of the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
20
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The Companys consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and follow general practices within the banking and financial services industry. The application of these accounting principles requires management to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions based upon information available at the time the financial statements are prepared, and affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Accordingly, as this information changes, future financial statements could reflect different results, estimates, judgments, and assumptions. Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of the Companys financial condition and results of operations and require managements most difficult, complex or subjective judgments due to their inherent reliance on the use of estimates and assumptions. The Companys critical accounting policies relate to the determination of the allowance for credit losses (the Allowance), other than temporary impairment of investment securities and deferred tax assets.
The Company provides for credit losses through the establishment of the Allowance. The Companys objective is to ensure that the Allowance is a reasonable estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the date of each statement of condition. Management considers a number of factors in estimating the required level of the Allowance. These factors include: historical loss experience in the loan portfolios; the levels and trends in past-due and nonaccrual loans; the status of nonaccrual loans and other loans identified as having the potential for further deterioration; credit risk and industry concentrations; trends in loan volume; the effects of any changes in lending policies and procedures or underwriting standards; and a continuing evaluation of the economic environment. The Companys estimate of the required Allowance is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the effects of economic and market conditions on borrowers.
Securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary. The term other than temporary is not intended to indicate a permanent decline in value. Rather, it means that the prospects for near term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support fair values equal to, or greater than, the carrying value of the investment. Management reviews criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, as well as the reasons for the decline, to predict whether the loss in value is other than temporary. Once a decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized.
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset/liability method. Deferred tax assets are recognized for the future consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period indicated by the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets when, in the judgment of management, it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not become realizable. The judgment about the level of future taxable income is dependent to a great extent on matters that may, at least in part, be beyond the Companys control. It is at least reasonably possible that managements judgment about the need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets could change in the near term.
INCOME STATEMENT ANALYSIS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the amount by which interest income on interest-earning assets exceeds interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, is the most significant component of the Companys earnings. Net interest income is a function of several factors, including changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and funding sources, and market interest rates. While management policies influence these factors, external forces, including customer needs and demands, competition, the economic policies of the federal government and the monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board, are also important.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information regarding the average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the amount of interest income and interest expense, and the resulting yields on average interest-earning assets and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities. Average balances are also provided for noninterest-earning assets and noninterest-bearing liabilities.
21
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AVERAGE BALANCES(a) |
INTEREST |
RATE |
AVERAGE BALANCES(a) |
INTEREST |
RATE |
AVERAGE BALANCES(a) |
INTEREST |
RATE |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income (b)(c) |
$ | 901,289 | $ | 53,004 | 5.88 | % | $ | 762,860 | $ | 45,296 | 5.94 | % | $ | 659,426 | $ | 43,873 | 6.65 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale(c) |
130,865 | 5,440 | 4.16 | 144,445 | 6,366 | 4.41 | 174,036 | 8,682 | 4.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits |
20,635 | 239 | 1.16 | 25,158 | 280 | 1.11 | 21,268 | 312 | 1.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
1,052,789 | 58,683 | 5.57 | 932,463 | 51,942 | 5.57 | 854,730 | 52,867 | 6.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
32,544 | 30,330 | 34,676 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
7,033 | 7,421 | 9,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
18,988 | 16,706 | 16,875 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less allowance for credit losses |
(11,256 | ) | (9,719 | ) | (8,569 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,100,098 | $ | 977,201 | $ | 907,465 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts |
$ | 88,127 | $ | 129 | 0.15 | % | $ | 89,366 | $ | 109 | 0.12 | % | $ | 75,017 | $ | 175 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings accounts |
85,696 | 225 | 0.26 | 86,269 | 374 | 0.43 | 72,987 | 742 | 1.02 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Money market accounts |
113,922 | 583 | 0.51 | 113,083 | 704 | 0.62 | 100,889 | 1,447 | 1.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
347,351 | 8,403 | 2.42 | 280,638 | 7,627 | 2.72 | 278,743 | 10,185 | 3.65 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
123,092 | 1,406 | 1.14 | 121,158 | 854 | 0.70 | 126,293 | 1,862 | 1.47 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
23,236 | 1,217 | 5.24 | 20,000 | 1,068 | 5.34 | 20,000 | 1,068 | 5.34 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
781,424 | 11,963 | 1.53 | 710,514 | 10,736 | 1.51 | 673,929 | 15,479 | 2.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
221,810 | 175,906 | 149,546 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
7,603 | 9,404 | 10,368 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
89,261 | 81,377 | 73,622 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,100,098 | $ | 977,201 | $ | 907,465 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 46,720 | $ | 41,206 | $ | 37,388 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
4.04 | % | 4.06 | % | 3.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (d) |
4.44 | % | 4.42 | % | 4.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Average balances are calculated as the average of daily balances. |
(b) | Average loan balances include first mortgage loans originated for sale and nonaccrual loans. Interest income on loans includes amortized loan fees, net of costs, of $2.8 million, $2.1 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. |
(c) | Interest on tax-exempt loans and securities is presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. Interest income includes the effects of taxable-equivalent adjustments using the federal income tax rate of 35.00% and, where applicable, the state rate of 7.00% (or a combined federal and state rate of 39.55%) to increase tax-exempt interest income to a taxable-equivalent basis. The taxable-equivalent adjustment amounts utilized in the above table aggregated $1.1 million in 2004, $539,000 in 2003 and $301,000 in 2002. |
(d) | Net interest margin is the ratio of net interest income, determined on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, to total average interest-earning assets. |
22
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis increased to $46.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to $41.2 million for 2003. The increase in tax-equivalent net interest income during 2004 was almost entirely due to a $120.3 million increase in average earning assets during 2004 as compared to 2003. An increase in average loans outstanding of $138.4 million, or 18.1%, was partially offset by declines in average investment securities and federal funds sold balances outstanding for the year of $13.6 million and $4.5 million, respectively. The increase in average loans outstanding is attributed to the Companys active business development efforts, as well as the continued relatively low interest rate environment and general economic conditions of the Companys primary service market. Although targeted short-term interest rates, as established by the Federal Reserve Bank, increased by 125 basis points during the latter half of 2004, the Companys yield on earning assets remain unchanged at 5.57% for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. The yield on loans decreased to 5.88% in 2004 compared to 5.94% for 2003 as higher yielding loans repriced during the year to lower rates. The yield on investment securities also decreased to 4.16% in 2004 from 4.41% in 2003. However, the overall yield on earning assets remained virtually unchanged as higher yielding loans became a larger percentage of total earning assets. The net impact was a $6.7 million or 13.0% increase in tax-equivalent interest income for the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to 2003.
Interest expense on total interest-bearing liabilities increased $1.2 million, or 11.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2004 versus 2003. The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits has dropped steadily over the last three years, from 2.38% for the year ended 2002, to 1.55% for 2003, to 1.47% for 2004, which served to partially offset the increase in expense due to growth in total funding. During 2004, a $1.7 million increase in interest expense on deposits due to increases in average outstanding balances was partially offset by $1.2 million decrease in interest expense related to the reduction in average rates. This decrease in rates was the result of managements pricing strategy, as well as the effect of longer-term certificates of deposit that matured during the year, repricing to lower rates. The rate on short-term borrowings, comprised primarily of short-term promissory notes and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, increased from .70% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003, to 1.14% in 2004.
Loan growth, although at lower average pricing levels than the prior year, mitigated by a modest increase in the overall cost of funds, combined to modestly improve the net interest margin in 2004 (on a fully taxable-equivalent basis) to 4.44%, compared to 4.42% in 2003. Should short-term interest rates remain unchanged, management would anticipate pressure on the net interest margin in future periods as the cost of funding sources fully catches up with rate adjustments initiated by the Federal Reserve.
The net interest margin in 2003 increased from 4.37% for the year ended December 31, 2002 to 4.42% for the year ended December 31, 2003. Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis increased to $41.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $37.4 million for 2002 primarily due a decrease in interest expense related to downward repricing of interest-bearing deposits. The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased from 2.38% for 2002, to 1.55% for 2003. The rate on short-term borrowings, comprised primarily of short-term promissory notes and securities sold under repurchase agreements, also decreased significantly to .70% in 2003, from 1.47% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. Average loans, net of unearned income, increased $103.4 million, or 15.7% from 2002 to 2003. Management attributes the significant increase in average loans during 2003 to successful marketing initiatives and the continued low interest rate environment. The average rate on loans decreased from 6.65% in 2002 to 5.94% in 2003. The net result was a modest improvement in the net interest margin in 2003 (on a fully taxable-equivalent basis) to 4.42%, compared to 4.37% in 2002.
23
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
The following table and the related discussions of interest income and interest expense provide further analysis of the changes in net interest income during 2004 and 2003:
2004 VERSUS 2003 |
2003 VERSUS 2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) |
DUE TO CHANGE IN (b) |
INCREASE (DECREASE) |
DUE TO CHANGE IN (b) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
VOLUME |
RATE |
VOLUME |
RATE |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (a) |
$ | 7,708 | $ | 8,145 | $ | (437 | ) | $ | 1,423 | $ | 6,443 | $ | (5,020 | ) | ||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale (a) |
(926 | ) | (577 | ) | (349 | ) | (2,316 | ) | (1,374 | ) | (942 | ) | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks |
(41 | ) | (52 | ) | 11 | (32 | ) | 51 | (83 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total |
6,741 | 7,516 | (775 | ) | (925 | ) | 5,120 | (6,045 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
526 | 1,678 | (1,152 | ) | (3,735 | ) | 371 | (4,106 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
701 | 184 | 517 | (1,008 | ) | (73 | ) | (935 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
1,227 | 1,862 | (635 | ) | (4,743 | ) | 298 | (5,041 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 5,514 | $ | 5,654 | $ | (140 | ) | $ | 3,818 | $ | 4,822 | $ | (1,004 | ) | ||||||||||
(a) | Interest on tax-exempt loans and securities is presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. |
(b) | The change in interest income and expense due to both rate and volume has been allocated to rate and volume changes in proportion to the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each. |
Interest Income
Interest income on a tax-equivalent basis increased $6.7 million, or 13.0%, in 2004 as compared to 2003 due to a 12.9%, or $120.3 million, increase in average earning assets with relatively no change in the yield on earning assets year over year. Short-term interest rates increased 125 basis points, beginning in the second half of 2004. However, the repayment and repricing of seasoned loans throughout the year were, on average, at lower levels causing the average yield on loans for the entire year to be lower than 2003. The effect on the yield on loans was a further decrease to 5.88% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, from 5.94% for 2003 and 6.65% for 2002. The Company carries a high percentage of variable rate loans in the portfolio that allows for improvement in loan yields as market rates rise. This is clearly evidenced by an increase in average loan portfolio yields during the third and fourth quarters of 2004 to 5.89% and 6.20%, respectively.
The Companys investment management strategy is predicated on limiting the amount of extension risk within the portfolio as well as maintaining a relatively short overall average life. Therefore, the yield on investments is somewhat susceptible to changes in shorter term interest rates. During the first half of 2004, in particular, this effect was evidenced by the reinvestment of investment portfolio cash flows at lower average yields resulting in a decrease in the average yield on investment securities from 4.99% in 2002 to 4.41% in 2003 to 4.16% in 2004. Average federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits decreased during 2004 to $20.6 million.
Although the average yields on loans and investment securities declined during 2004, an increase in the proportion of average loans outstanding to total average earning assets mitigated the impact on the total yield on earning assets. Essentially, cash flows from lower yielding investment securities and federal funds sold were redistributed into higher yielding loans, effectively decreasing the investment proportion of earning assets. In addition, net growth in earning assets was directed toward the loan portfolio. In total, the result was a yield on earning assets that remained unchanged at 5.57% compared to December 31, 2003, effectively halting the decline in the yield on earning assets from 6.19% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $1.2 million, or 11.4%, from $10.7 million in 2003 to $11.9 million in 2004. The increase in total interest expense is principally the result of a $70.9 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities, comprised of a $66.7 million increase in average certificates of deposit outstanding and a $5.2 million increase in borrowed funds. These increases were partially offset by a net decline of $1.0 million in average NOW, savings and money market account balances for 2004 compared to 2003. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 was 1.53%, up 2 basis points from 1.51% for 2003, despite increased upward pressure from market competition during the second half of 2004. An increase in the average cost of borrowed funds from 1.36% for 2003 to 1.79% in 2004 was offset by a decrease in the cost of deposits from 1.55% for 2003 to 1.47% for 2004.
The decline in the rates paid for certificates of deposit was the most significant component in the decrease in the cost of deposits. The average cost of certificates of deposit declined from 2.72% to 2.42%, money market and NOW accounts repriced from
24
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
.40% to .35%, and the rates on savings accounts dropped from .43% to .26%. Although there was a decrease in the average cost of deposit funds for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 as compared to 2003, the Company experienced increased market pressure during the fourth quarter of 2004 that resulted in an increase in average rates paid on NOW, money market and savings accounts, as well as an incremental increase in the cost of certificate of deposit offerings for the quarter.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income decreased from $9.0 million during 2003 to $6.8 million in 2004 due, in large part, to declines in gains and fees recognized on the sale of mortgage loans, net of costs, fees charged for services, and other income. Specifically, net gains and fees on sales of mortgage loans decreased $1.5 million, or 51.4%, from 2003 to 2004, and fees charged for services decreased by $276,000, or 6.9%. Other income also declined $373,000, or 27.3%. The decrease in net gains and fees on sales of mortgage loans corresponded to a decrease in the volume of mortgage loans sold during the year, from $293.9 million in 2003 to $126.9 million in 2004. The Company believes that this decrease in mortgage loan volume was primarily attributable to the market, in general, reaching the final stages of a mortgage refinancing cycle.
The decrease in fees charged for services was due, in part, to the impact of an increase in the Companys internal earnings credit provided to commercial customers, the effect of which increases the amount of fees covered by compensating balances and decreases the amount of fees collected. In addition, fees income from overdraft accounts decreased $482,000 due to a general decline in related volume and also to the elimination of certain accounts which management viewed as presenting unacceptable risk. Other income decreased $373,000 due to non-recurring fees recognized upon the prepayment of certain large lending relationships during 2003.
Noninterest income increased to $9.0 million in 2003 from $7.9 million in 2002 due to increases in gains and fees on sales of mortgage loans, net of costs, and fees charged for services. Specifically, net gains and fees on sales of mortgage loans increased $857,000, or 40.8%, from 2002 to 2003, and fees charged for services increased by $424,000, or 11.9%. The growth in net gains and fees on sales of mortgage loans corresponded to an increase in the volume of mortgage loans sold during the year, from $189.5 million in 2002 to $293.9 million in 2003.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense consists primarily of costs associated with personnel, occupancy and equipment, data processing, marketing and professional fees. The Companys noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 totaled $31.0 million, representing an increase of $1.1 million, or 3.6%, as compared to 2003. Salaries and employee benefits, the largest component of noninterest expense, represented the largest portion of the increase, growing $480,000, or 2.9%, from 2003 to 2004. Salaries and wages increased $500,000 during the period due to merit increases that were partially offset by a decrease in the average number of full-time equivalent employees from 342 in 2003 to 337 in 2004. Other components of salaries, including payroll taxes and retail incentives, increased $103,000 from 2003 to 2004. Employee benefits decreased by $204,000, primarily reflecting reduced costs associated with the Companys Deferred Compensation Plan that is largely determined by annual appreciation in the Companys common stock. The Companys stock price increased to $34.19 at December 31, 2004, from $31.95 at December 31, 2003 and $22.03 at December 31, 2002. Amounts, deferred by the participant and contributed by the Company in the form of a matching contribution, accrue earnings based on the prime rate of interest or the performance of the Companys common stock, as directed by the participant.
Occupancy costs increased $132,000, or 3.5%, reflecting normal lease payment escalations and costs to maintain business properties. Data processing costs increased $14,000, as costs associated with implementing new products and services and increases in transaction activity were offset by savings derived from the Companys conversion to a new core processing platform in September 2004. Professional fees, primarily reflecting added consulting, legal and audit expenses related to Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, increased $282,000, or 42.5%, from 2003 to 2004.
Noninterest expense for 2003 increased $2.8 million, or 10.3%, to $30.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $27.2 million for 2002. Salaries and benefits represented the largest portion of the increase, growing $1.7 million, or 11.3%, from 2002 to 2003. Salaries and wages increased $1.2 million during the period due to merit increases and an increase in the average number of full-time equivalent employees from 322 in 2002 to 342 in 2003. Other components of salaries, including payroll taxes and retail incentives, increased $256,000 from 2002 to 2003. Employee benefits increased by $463,000, primarily reflecting costs associated with the Companys Deferred Compensation Plan, driven by an appreciation in the Companys stock from $22.03 at December 31, 2002 to $31.95 at December 31, 2003.
Occupancy costs increased $478,000, reflecting the transition from property ownership in 2002 to rental in 2003, as the Company sold its administrative office building and moved into leased office space. Data processing costs increased $299,000 as the Company implemented new products and services and transaction activity increased.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense was $7.3 million in 2004, compared to $6.6 million in 2003 and $6.2 million 2002. The effective tax rate was 35.5% in 2004, 35.6% in 2003 and 36.2% in 2002. The effective tax rates fluctuate from year to year due to changes in the mix of tax-exempt loans and investments as a percentage of total loans and investments.
25
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
Cash and Due From Banks
Cash and due from banks represents cash on hand, cash on deposit with other banks and cash items in process of collection. As a result of the Companys cash management services provided to large, sophisticated corporate customers (which includes cash concentration activities and processing coin and currency transactions), cash balances may be higher than industry averages for banks of a similar asset size.
Analysis of Investments
The investment portfolio consists of investment securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale. Investment securities held-to-maturity are those securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. Securities available-for-sale are those securities that the Company intends to hold for an indefinite period of time but not necessarily until maturity. These securities are carried at fair value and may be sold as part of an asset/liability management strategy, liquidity management, interest rate risk management, regulatory capital management or other similar factors.
The components of the investment portfolio were as follows at December 31:
2004 |
2003 |
2002 | ||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
SECURITIES HELD-TO MATURITY |
SECURITIES AVAILABLE- FOR-SALE |
SECURITIES HELD-TO MATURITY |
SECURITIES AVAILABLE- FOR-SALE |
SECURITIES HELD-TO MATURITY |
SECURITIES AVAILABLE- FOR-SALE | ||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed securities (a) |
$ | 2,504 | $ | 20,746 | $ | 3,479 | $ | 23,169 | $ | 6,228 | $ | 4,804 | ||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored agencies |
113,666 | 1,014 | 73,865 | 5,613 | 106,317 | 14,726 | ||||||||||||
Trust preferred stocks |
| 13,089 | | 15,827 | | 15,404 | ||||||||||||
Other equity securities |
| 1,415 | | 1,240 | | 764 | ||||||||||||
General purpose revenue bonds |
| 7,883 | | 8,114 | | | ||||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
| 3,833 | | 2,620 | | 2,217 | ||||||||||||
Other investments |
| | | | | 1,038 | ||||||||||||
$ | 116,170 | $ | 47,980 | $ | 77,344 | $ | 56,583 | $ | 112,545 | $ | 38,953 | |||||||
(a) | The entire balance is issued and guaranteed by U.S. Government sponsored agencies. |
The investment portfolio increased $30.2 million from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004 due primarily to purchases of securities of $110.8 million, offset by maturities and accelerated calls of securities in 2004 totaling $74.4 million. Principal repayments accounted for an additional $6.1 million of the year-to-year change in the balance.
26
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
The amortized cost, estimated fair values and weighted average yield of debt securities at December 31, 2004, by maturities, are shown below. Mortgage-backed securities are categorized by their estimated maturities based upon the most recent monthly prepayment factors, which may change. All other debt securities are categorized based on contractual maturities.
SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY |
SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE |
CURRENT AVERAGE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMORTIZED COST |
UNREALIZED |
ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE |
AMORTIZED COST |
UNREALIZED |
ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE |
|||||||||||||||||||||
GAINS |
LOSSES |
GAINS |
LOSSES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred stocks: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 13,162 | $ | 82 | $ | 155 | $ | 13,089 | 4.84 | % | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due after one through five years |
| | | | 35 | 1 | | 36 | 5.51 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
2,504 | 24 | | 2,528 | 28,634 | 160 | 201 | 28,593 | 5.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored agencies: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due one year or less |
2,225 | 26 | | 2,251 | 1,000 | 14 | | 1,014 | 4.79 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Due after one through five years |
111,441 | 72 | 328 | 111,185 | | | | | 3.28 | % | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 116,170 | $ | 122 | $ | 328 | $ | 115,964 | $ | 42,831 | $ | 257 | $ | 356 | $ | 42,732 | 3.96 | % | ||||||||||
(a) | Tax-equivalent weighted average yield. |
Analysis of Loans
The table below represents a breakdown of loan balances of the Company at December 31.
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate development and construction (a) |
$ | 345,375 | $ | 283,599 | $ | 196,186 | $ | 175,003 | $ | 129,547 | |||||||||
Commercial |
226,763 | 221,374 | 177,073 | 147,395 | 157,067 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
17,272 | 16,349 | 13,779 | 15,648 | 18,594 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial |
163,985 | 143,723 | 134,485 | 115,450 | 90,680 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Retail (b) |
196,198 | 169,298 | 143,359 | 146,379 | 139,967 | ||||||||||||||
Credit card |
| | 6 | 2,389 | 2,572 | ||||||||||||||
Other |
668 | 1,504 | 382 | 463 | 1,035 | ||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 950,261 | $ | 835,847 | $ | 665,270 | $ | 602,727 | $ | 539,462 | |||||||||
(a) | At December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000, loans to individuals for constructing primary personal residences amounted to $49.0 million, $40.8 million, $30.6 million, $22.9 million and $17.4 million, respectively. |
(b) | Primarily loans secured by the borrowers principal residences in the form of home equity lines of credit and second mortgages. |
The Company benefited from another successful year with respect to total growth in outstanding loans during 2004. Total loans increased $114.4 million, or 13.7%, to $950.3 million at December 31, 2004 compared to December 31, 2003 total loans of $835.8 million. The Company continued to build upon a well-defined niche in real estate development and construction lending. Although interest rates began to climb in the second half of the year, the relatively low rate environment and active business development efforts in this area contributed $61.8 million in loan growth, a 21.8% increase, in that portfolio.
27
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
The following table sets forth the loan growth in the real estate development and construction loan portfolio by category from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004:
DECEMBER 31, |
CHANGE |
|||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
AMOUNT |
PERCENT |
||||||||
Residential construction |
$ | 139,417 | $ | 96,068 | $ | 43,349 | 45.1 | % | ||||
Residential land development |
88,385 | 81,139 | 7,246 | 8.9 | ||||||||
Land acquisition |
69,238 | 61,370 | 7,868 | 12.8 | ||||||||
Commercial construction |
48,335 | 45,022 | 3,313 | 7.4 | ||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 345,375 | $ | 283,599 | $ | 61,776 | 21.8 | % | ||||
At December 31, 2004, commercial loans, including commercial real estate loans, increased $25.7 million, or 7.0%, over outstanding commercial loans at December 31, 2003. The most significant increase within this category of loans was in fixed rate commercial mortgage loans, which increased $16.5 million, or 23.7%, from year-to-year. Commercial term loans also demonstrated strong growth during 2004, increasing $20.4 million, or 17.3%, over 2003. The Company has been successful in the current interest rate environment in limiting long-term fixed rate lending. Fixed rate commercial loans represent only 44.0% of the total commercial loan portfolio at December 31, 2004, compared to 42.2% at December 31, 2003.
Retail lending, primarily consisting of home equity lines of credit and second mortgages, also grew during 2004. The Company continued to build upon opportunities afforded by healthy market conditions and sustained low interest rates through effective business development efforts and targeted marketing campaigns. The result was an increase of $26.9 million, or 15.9%, from December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2004.
The following table summarizes the Companys exposure resulting from loan concentrations in its loan portfolio. Loan concentrations result when loans are made to a number of borrowers engaged in similar activities that may be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. This table presents the Companys credit concentration as of December 31, 2004 to borrowers involved in land development and/or construction, including general contractors and specialty trade contractors, or borrowers in the business of managing, renting, leasing or otherwise allowing the use of their real estate by others. There were no other loan concentrations exceeding 10% of gross loans as of December 31, 2004.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL | |||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
LAND DEVELOPMENT/ CONSTRUCTION |
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT |
TOTAL CONCENTRATION | ||||||
Loans receivable |
$ | 247,305 | $ | 131,082 | $ | 378,387 | |||
Unused credit lines |
232,456 | 5,196 | 237,652 | ||||||
Letters of credit |
15,986 | 100 | 16,086 | ||||||
$ | 495,747 | $ | 136,378 | $ | 632,125 | ||||
28
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
The following table shows the contractual maturities and interest rate sensitivities of the Companys loans at December 31, 2004, exclusive of nonaccrual loans totaling $614,000. Some loans may include contractual installment payments that are not reflected in the table until final maturity. In addition, the Companys experience indicates that a significant number of loans will be extended or repaid prior to contractual maturity. Consequently, the table is not intended to be a forecast of future cash repayments.
MATURING |
|||||||||||||||||||||
IN ONE YEAR OR LESS |
AFTER 1 THROUGH 5 YEARS |
AFTER 5 YEARS |
|||||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
FIXED(a) |
VARIABLE |
FIXED(a) |
VARIABLE |
FIXED(a) |
VARIABLE |
TOTAL | ||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 13,728 | $ | 72,038 | $ | 44,519 | $ | 53,930 | $ | 27,111 | $ | 14,888 | $ | 226,214 | |||||||
Real estate-development and construction |
11,043 | 295,248 | 9,328 | 18,759 | 8,954 | 2,043 | 345,375 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate-mortgage |
23,943 | 16,778 | 51,633 | 35,366 | 31,253 | 22,241 | 181,214 | ||||||||||||||
Consumer and other |
2,499 | 7,016 | 3,848 | 3,137 | 11,142 | 169,202 | 196,844 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 51,213 | $ | 391,080 | $ | 109,328 | $ | 111,192 | $ | 78,460 | $ | 208,374 | $ | 949,647 | ||||||||
(a) | Fixed rate loans include $23.9 million in variable rate loans that reached a contractual interest rate floor and are therefore fixed until rates increase to a level where the notes are again free to float. Such loans total $5.5 million maturing in one year or less, $8.2 million maturing after one through five years and $10.2 maturing after five years. |
The following table provides information concerning nonperforming assets and past-due loans at December 31.
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 | ||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans (a) |
$ | 614 | $ | 892 | $ | 563 | $ | 3,230 | $ | 3,917 | |||||
Restructured loans |
| | | | 294 | ||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
| | 178 | 1,187 | 2,996 | ||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 614 | $ | 892 | $ | 741 | $ | 4,417 | $ | 7,207 | |||||
Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more |
$ | 31 | $ | 72 | $ | 168 | $ | 819 | $ | 218 | |||||
(a) | Loans are placed in nonaccrual status when they are past-due 90 days as to either principal or interest or when, in the opinion of management, the collection of all interest and/or principal is in doubt. A loan remains in nonaccrual status until the loan is current as to payment of both principal and interest and the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay and remain current. Management may grant a waiver from nonaccrual status for a 90-day past-due loan that is both well secured and in the process of collection. |
Nonaccrual loans totaled $614,000 at December 31, 2004 and consisted primarily of four commercial relationships with loans totaling $549,000, of which $468,000 was guaranteed by the Small Business Administration. Nonaccrual loans also included four consumer loans totaling $22,000 and one mortgage loan carried at $43,000.
Potential problem loans consist of loans that are currently performing in accordance with contractual terms; however, management has designated these assets as problem loans due to concerns about the ability of the obligor to continue to comply with repayment terms that may result from the obligors potential operating or financial difficulties. At the end of 2004, loans of this type that are not included in the above table of nonperforming and past-due loans amounted to approximately $11.8 million, of which $470,000 is guaranteed by the Small Business Administration. There are three commercial relationships that comprise 79.6% of all loans classified as potential problems. Two of these relationships are well secured by property with residential real estate as the highest and best use and have an appraised value in excess of the carrying value of the loan. The other relationship is well secured by commercial real estate and other business assets that are considered sufficient to collect all amounts due in the event of deterioration in the customers financial condition. Nearly all of the remaining loans included as potential problem loans at December 31, 2004 were commercial loans secured by business assets other than real estate; the average relationship was less than $101,000 and the largest relationship was $914,000. Depending on changes in the economy and other future events, these loans and others not presently identified as problem loans could be reclassified as nonperforming or impaired loans in the future.
A loan is determined to be impaired when, based on current information and events, management believes that it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A loan is not considered impaired during a period of delay in payment if the Company expects to collect all amounts due, including past-due interest. The Company generally considers a period of delay in payment to include delinquency up to 90 days.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan (SFAS No. 114), the Company measures impaired loans; (i) at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate; (ii) at the observable market price; or (iii) at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
If the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance and corresponding provision for credit losses. SFAS No. 114 does not apply to larger groups of smaller-balance
29
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
homogeneous loans such as consumer installment, residential first and second mortgage loans and credit card loans. These loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. The Companys impaired loans are therefore comprised primarily of commercial loans, including commercial mortgage loans, and real estate development and construction loans. In addition, impaired loans are generally loans that management has placed in nonaccrual status since loans are generally placed in nonaccrual status on the earlier of the date that management determines that the collection of interest and/or principal is in doubt or the date that principal or interest is 90 days or more past-due.
Impaired loans totaled $549,000 and $827,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. At December 31, 2003, $100,000 of total impaired loans were collateral dependent. There were no impaired loans that were collateral dependent at December 31, 2004. Collateral dependent loans are measured based on the fair value of the collateral. Impaired loans that are not collateral dependent are measured at the present value of expected future cash flows using the loans effective interest rates. Specific reserves assigned to impaired loans totaled $51,000 at December 31, 2004 and $13,000 at December 31, 2003. An impaired loan is charged off when the loan, or a portion thereof, is considered uncollectible.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company provides for credit losses through the establishment of an allowance for credit losses (the Allowance) by provisions charged against earnings. Based upon managements evaluation, provisions are made to maintain the Allowance at a level adequate to absorb probable losses within the loan portfolio. The provision for credit losses was $728,000 for 2004, as compared to $1.2 million for 2003 and $835,000 for 2002.
The Allowance consists of three elements: (i) specific reserves for individual credits; (ii) general reserves for types or portfolios of loans based on historical loan loss experience, judgmentally adjusted for current conditions and credit risk concentrations; and, (iii) unallocated reserves. Combined specific reserves and general reserves by loan type are considered allocated reserves. All outstanding loans are considered in evaluating the adequacy of the Allowance. The Allowance does not provide for estimated losses stemming from uncollectible interest because the Company generally requires all accrued but unpaid interest to be reversed once a loan is placed on nonaccrual status.
The process of establishing the Allowance with respect to the Companys commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios begins when a loan officer initially assigns each loan a risk grade, using established credit criteria. Risk grades are reviewed and validated annually by an independent consulting firm, as well as periodically by the Companys internal credit review function. Management reviews, on a quarterly basis, current conditions that affect various lines of business and may warrant adjustments to historical loss experience in determining the required Allowance. Adjustment factors that are considered include: the levels and trends in past-due and nonaccrual loans; trends in loan volume; effects of any changes in lending policies and procedures or underwriting standards; and the experience and depth of lending management. Historical factors by product type are adjusted each quarter based on actual loss history. Management also evaluates credit risk concentrations, including trends in large dollar exposures to related borrowers, and industry concentrations. All nonaccrual loans in the commercial and real estate (construction and non-residential mortgage) portfolios, as well as other loans in the portfolios identified as having the potential for further deterioration, are analyzed individually to confirm the appropriate risk grading and accrual status and to determine the need for a specific reserve.
Retail and residential mortgage loans are segregated into homogeneous pools with similar risk characteristics. Trends and current conditions in retail and residential mortgage pools are analyzed and historical loss experience is adjusted accordingly. Adjustment factors for the retail and residential mortgage portfolios are consistent with those for the commercial portfolios.
The unallocated portion of the Allowance is intended to provide for losses that are not identified when establishing the specific and general portions of the Allowance. The Company has risk management practices designed to ensure timely identification of changes in loan risk profiles; however, undetected losses inherently exist within the loan portfolios. The judgmental aspects involved in applying the risk grading criteria, analyzing the quality of individual loans and assessing collateral values can also contribute to undetected, but probable, losses. At December 31, 2004, the Allowance was 1.22% of total loans, net of unearned income. The Allowance at December 31, 2004 is considered by management to be sufficient to address the credit losses inherent in the current loan portfolio.
The Company uses the same factors to evaluate financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk as it does for those with on-balance-sheet-risk. As of December 31, 2004, the reserve for losses associated with financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk totaled $82,000. This reserve, like the Allowance, is reviewed quarterly to assess its adequacy.
30
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
The following table presents certain information regarding the Allowance for the years ended December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||||
Allowance at beginning of year |
$ | 10,828 | $ | 8,839 | $ | 8,024 | $ | 7,026 | $ | 6,071 | ||||||||||
Less losses charged off: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
240 | 166 | 368 | 648 | 2,003 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate |
| 161 | 15 | 73 | 404 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
36 | 133 | 91 | 30 | 95 | |||||||||||||||
Credit cards |
| 10 | 61 | 103 | 130 | |||||||||||||||
Total losses charged off |
276 | 470 | 535 | 854 | 2,632 | |||||||||||||||
Recoveries of losses previously charged off: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial (a) |
141 | 1,143 | 441 | 214 | 115 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate |
136 | 29 | 43 | 73 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer |
22 | 111 | 18 | 14 | 19 | |||||||||||||||
Credit cards |
4 | 6 | 13 | 17 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Total recoveries |
303 | 1,289 | 515 | 318 | 164 | |||||||||||||||
Net losses charged off (recoveries) |
(27 | ) | (819 | ) | 20 | 536 | 2,468 | |||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
728 | 1,170 | 835 | 1,534 | 3,423 | |||||||||||||||
Allowance at end of year |
$ | 11,583 | $ | 10,828 | $ | 8,839 | $ | 8,024 | $ | 7,026 | ||||||||||
Ratio of allowance to nonperforming, restructured and past-due loans (b) |
1,795.81 | % | 1,123.24 | % | 1,209.17 | % | 198.17 | % | 158.64 | % | ||||||||||
Ratio of allowance to loans, net of unearned income |
1.22 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.30 | % | ||||||||||
(a) | Commercial recoveries in 2003 included a single recovery of $746,000 that related to a commercial loan relationship partially charged-off in a prior year. |
(b) | There is no direct relationship between the size of the Allowance (and the related provision for credit losses) and nonperforming and past-due loans. Accordingly, the ratio of Allowance to nonperforming and past-due loans may tend to fluctuate significantly. |
A breakdown of the Allowance is provided in the table below; however, management does not believe that the Allowance can be segregated by category with precision. The breakdown of the Allowance is based primarily on those factors discussed previously in evaluating the Allowance as a whole. Since all of those factors are subject to change, the breakdown is not necessarily indicative of the category of actual or realized credit losses.
The following table presents the allocation of the Allowance among the various loan categories at December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 | ||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 3,129 | $ | 4,130 | $ | 3,075 | $ | 2,402 | $ | 2,636 | |||||
Real estate |
6,237 | 4,806 | 4,154 | 3,845 | 2,301 | ||||||||||
Consumer |
1,707 | 1,576 | 1,213 | 1,217 | 954 | ||||||||||
Unallocated |
510 | 316 | 397 | 560 | 1,135 | ||||||||||
$ | 11,583 | $ | 10,828 | $ | 8,839 | $ | 8,024 | $ | 7,026 | ||||||
The table below provides a percentage breakdown of the loan portfolio by category to total loans, net of unearned income, at December 31:
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||
Commercial |
23.9 | % | 26.5 | % | 26.6 | % | 24.4 | % | 29.1 | % | |||||
Real estate |
53.4 | 51.1 | 49.7 | 48.2 | 40.8 | ||||||||||
Consumer |
22.7 | 22.4 | 23.7 | 27.4 | 30.1 | ||||||||||
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
31
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Other Earning Assets
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale increased from $6.0 million at December 31, 2003 to $8.7 million at December 31, 2004, primarily due to an increase in year-end mortgage banking activity and the timing involved in executing sales. Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks totaled $10.1 million at December 31, 2004, as compared to $3.5 million at December 31, 2003 and $101.5 million at December 31, 2002. The balance outstanding as December 31, 2004 is considered by management to be reasonable considering loan and deposit balances and anticipated liquidity requirements. The balance outstanding at December 31, 2002 was unusually high as year-end deposit growth, including balances held by title company customers, outpaced loan growth and cash requirements. The balances outstanding at year-end 2004 and 2003 are indicative of normal operating levels.
Deposit Analysis
The following table sets forth the average deposit balances and average rates paid on deposits during the years ended December 31:
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AVERAGE BALANCE |
AVERAGE RATE |
AVERAGE BALANCE |
AVERAGE RATE |
AVERAGE BALANCE |
AVERAGE RATE |
||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
$ | 221,810 | | % | $ | 175,906 | | % | $ | 149,546 | | % | ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts |
88,127 | 0.15 | 89,366 | 0.12 | 75,017 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||
Savings accounts |
85,696 | 0.26 | 86,269 | 0.43 | 72,987 | 1.02 | ||||||||||||
Money market accounts |
113,922 | 0.51 | 113,083 | 0.62 | 100,889 | 1.43 | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
347,351 | 2.42 | 280,638 | 2.72 | 278,743 | 3.65 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
635,096 | 1.47 | 569,356 | 1.55 | 527,636 | 2.38 | ||||||||||||
Total deposits |
$ | 856,906 | 1.09 | % | $ | 745,262 | 1.18 | % | $ | 677,182 | 1.85 | % | ||||||
Total deposits increased $125.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2004. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $49.8 million, and interest-bearing deposits grew $75.2 million. Growth was attributable to successful marketing and business development activities.
The following table provides the maturities of certificates of deposit of the Company in amounts of $100,000 or more at December 31. Of the total certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2004, $61.8 million, or 47.9%, was comprised of penalty-free certificates, which can be withdrawn without penalty prior to maturity. The Company had no brokered deposits as of December 31, 2004, 2003 or 2002.
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 | ||||||
Maturing in: |
|||||||||
3 months or less |
$ | 71,966 | $ | 10,351 | $ | 7,996 | |||
Over 3 months through 6 months |
9,235 | 8,530 | 8,912 | ||||||
Over 6 months through 12 months |
4,047 | 36,575 | 34,994 | ||||||
Over 12 months |
43,744 | 33,282 | 22,615 | ||||||
$ | 128,992 | $ | 88,738 | $ | 74,517 | ||||
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings consisted of short-term promissory notes issued to certain qualified investors, securities sold under repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB). The short-term promissory notes are in the form of commercial paper sold to the Banks customers, reprice daily and have maturities of 270 days or less. Securities sold under repurchase agreements are securities sold to the Banks customers under a continuing roll-over contract and mature in one business day. The underlying securities sold are federal agency securities that are segregated from the Companys other investment securities. Short-term borrowings from the FHLB outstanding during 2004, 2003 and 2002 repriced daily, had maturities of one year or less and could have been prepaid without penalty. Federal funds purchased are unsecured, overnight borrowings from other financial institutions.
For additional information on short-term borrowings, refer to note 14 of the consolidated financial statements.
32
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Long-term Borrowings
At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company had three long-term advances from the FHLB totaling $20.0 million, with fixed rates of interest ranging from 4.64% to 5.51%. The advances are scheduled to mature in 2008.
On June 24, 2004, a trust formed by the Company issued $6 million of trust preferred securities at an initial variable interest rate of 4.21%, which will reset quarterly. These long-term borrowings, which bear a maturity date of June 25, 2034, may be redeemed at any time after June 24, 2009, and require quarterly distributions by the trust to the holder of the trust preferred securities. The notes are subordinated to the prior payment of any other indebtedness of the Company that, by its terms, is not similarly subordinated. The trust preferred securities qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to regulatory guidelines that limit the amount included to an aggregate of 25% of Tier 1 capital.
On December 30, 2004, a trust formed by the Company issued an additional $4 million in trust preferred securities at an initial variable interest rate of 4.45%, which will reset quarterly. These long-term borrowings bear a maturity date of December 15, 2034, and may be redeemed at any time after December 15, 2009. The trust preferred securities require quarterly distributions by the trust to the holder of the trust preferred securities. The notes are subordinated to the prior payment of any other indebtedness of the Company that, by its terms, is not similarly subordinated. The trust preferred securities qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to regulatory guidelines that limit the amount included to an aggregate of 25% of Tier 1 capital.
Liquidity
Liquidity describes the ability of the Company to meet financial obligations, including lending commitments and contingencies, that arise during the normal course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of customers of the Company, as well as to meet current and planned expenditures. During the year ended December 31, 2004, for example, net loan disbursements in excess of principal repayments totaled $143.5 million. These cash requirements were largely satisfied through net growth in deposits of $125.0 million.
The borrowing requirements of customers include commitments to extend credit and unused availability of lines of credit, which totaled $525.8 million at December 31, 2004. Historically, many of the commitments expire without being fully drawn; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Commitments for real estate development and construction, which totaled $271.8 million, or 51.7% of the $525.8 million, are generally short-term and turn over rapidly, satisfying cash requirements with principal repayments from sales of the properties financed. Available credit lines represent the unused portion of lines of credit previously extended and available to the customer so long as there is no violation of material contractual conditions. Commercial commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit totaled $113.5 million, or 21.6% of the $525.8 million, at December 31, 2004 and generally do not extend for more than 12 months. At December 31, 2004, available home equity lines totaled $128.9 million. Home equity credit lines generally extend for a period of 15 years and are reviewed annually.
Customer withdrawals are also a principal use of liquidity, but are generally mitigated by growth in customer funding sources, such as deposits and short-term borrowings in the form of commercial paper and securities sold under repurchase agreements. While balances may fluctuate up and down in any given period, historically the Company has experienced a steady increase in total customer funding sources.
Fluctuations in deposit and short-term borrowing balances may be influenced by the rates paid, general consumer confidence and the overall economic environment. The Company has several large depository relationships with title companies that may experience a higher degree of volatility with regard to outstanding balances, especially during periods of significant mortgage refinancing activity as experienced in 2004, 2003 and 2002. In addition, month-end balances for these relationships tend to be inflated, as compared to balances throughout the month. At December 31, 2003, total title company relationships accounted for $57.2 million, or 6.4% of the total customer funding of $887.9 million. At December 31, 2004, total title company relationships accounted for $65.3 million, or 6.4% of the total customer funding of $1.0 billion. The Company expects these title company balances to remain volatile during 2005.
The Companys primary source of liquidity (financing activities as used in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows) is funding provided by its customers in the form of deposits, and by short-term borrowings in the form of commercial paper and securities sold under repurchase agreements; although, as noted above, this source of liquidity is subject to considerable volatility. At December 31, 2004, total customer funding was $1.0 billion. Core deposits, defined as all deposits except certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more, totaled $783.6 million, or 76.4% of total customer funding. Additional internal sources of liquidity include maturities and calls in the Companys investment portfolio as well as the Companys overnight investment in federal funds sold. Securities scheduled to mature and likely to be called in one year, based on year-end interest rates, totaled $114.6 million at December 31, 2004 and federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks were $10.1 million.
The Company also has the ability to utilize established credit as an additional source of liquidity. The Bank, as a member of the FHLB, has an approved credit line of $235 million, equal to 20% of total assets as reported on the most recent regulatory report.
33
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
Collateral must be pledged to the FHLB before advances can be obtained. At December 31, 2004, the Company had collateral sufficient to borrow $191.3 from the FHLB, and outstanding advances totaled $39.5 million. The Bank also has an established borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). At December 31, 2004, the Bank had pledged sufficient collateral to borrow up to $47.7 million from the FRB; no balances were outstanding on that date.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Total stockholders equity was $92.3 million at December 31, 2004, representing an increase of $6.9 million, or 8.1%, from December 31, 2003. The growth of stockholders equity during 2004 was primarily attributable to the earnings of the Company of $13.3 million less cash dividends declared on common stock of $4.4 million and $2.7 million used to purchase 93,546 shares of the Companys common stock. Capital was increased by $524,000 as a result of stock options exercised during 2004. At December 31, 2004, the Company had no material capital expenditure commitments.
The Federal Reserve Board has adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies. As of December 31, 2004, the minimum ratio of capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance-sheet items, such as standby letters of credit) was 8.0%. At least half of the total capital must be comprised of common equity, retained earnings and a limited amount of perpetual preferred stock, after subtracting goodwill and certain other intangibles and making various other adjustments (Tier 1 capital). The remainder may consist of perpetual debt, mandatory convertible debt securities, a limited amount of subordinated debt, other preferred stock and limited amounts of credit loss reserves (Tier 2 capital). The maximum amount of supplementary capital elements that qualify as Tier 2 capital is limited to 100% of Tier 1 capital, net of goodwill and certain other intangible assets. The Federal Reserve Board also has adopted a minimum leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average assets) of 4.0% for bank holding companies that meet certain specified criteria, including having the highest regulatory rating. The rule indicates that the minimum leverage ratio should be at least 1.0% to 2.0% higher for holding companies that do not have the highest rating or that are undertaking major expansion programs. Failure to meet the capital guidelines could subject a banking institution to a variety of enforcement remedies available to bank regulatory agencies.
The tables below present the Companys capital position relative to its various minimum statutory and regulatory capital requirements at December 31, 2004.
TIER 1 LEVERAGE RATIO |
||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMOUNT |
PERCENT OF AVERAGE ASSETS |
||||
Tier 1 capital (a) |
$ | 102,229 | 8.8 | % | ||
Tier 1 leverage ratio requirement |
46,701 | 4.0 | ||||
Excess |
$ | 55,528 | 4.8 | % | ||
Quarterly average total assets |
$ | 1,167,536 | ||||
RISK-BASED CAPITAL RATIO |
||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMOUNT |
PERCENT OF RISK- WEIGHTED ASSETS |
||||
Tier 1 capital (a) |
$ | 102,229 | 9.7 | % | ||
Risk-based Tier 1 capital requirement |
41,972 | 4.0 | ||||
Excess |
$ | 60,257 | 5.7 | % | ||
Tier 1 capital (a) |
$ | 102,229 | 9.7 | % | ||
Tier 2 capital (b) |
11,665 | 1.2 | ||||
Total risk-based capital |
113,894 | 10.9 | ||||
Risk-based capital requirement |
83,944 | 8.0 | ||||
Excess |
$ | 29,950 | 2.9 | % | ||
Risk-weighted assets |
$ | 1,049,300 | ||||
(a) | Tier 1 capital is comprised of the following at December 31, 2004: |
GAAP capital |
$ | 92,348 | ||
Less unrealized net gain on securities available-for-sale, net of taxes |
(119 | ) | ||
Plus trust preferred stock |
10,000 | |||
$ | 102,229 | |||
(b) | Tier 2 capital includes the allowance for credit losses and off-balance sheet risk, limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. |
34
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In January 2003, FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (Interpretation No. 46), which explains identification of variable interest entities and the assessment of whether to consolidate those entities. FIN 46 Revised (FIN 46R), issued in December 2003, replaces FIN 46. FIN 46R requires public entities to apply FIN 46 or FIN 46R to all entities that are considered variable interest entities, in practice and under the FASB literature that was applied before the issuance of FIN 46, by the end of the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003. For any variable interest entities (VIE) that must be consolidated under FIN 46R, the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests of the VIE initially would be measured at their carrying amounts with any difference between the net amount added to the statement of condition and any previously recognized interest being recognized as the cumulative effect of an accounting change. If determining the carrying amounts is not practicable, fair value at the date FIN 46R first applies may be used to measure the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest of the VIE. FIN 46R requires deconsolidation and re-characterization of the underlying consolidated debt obligation from the trust preferred securities obligation to the junior subordinated debenture obligation that exists between a company and its statutory trusts. In June 2004 and December 2004, the Company issued trust preferred securities through two wholly-owned statutory trusts formed for that purpose. In accordance with FIN 46R, the statutory trusts have not been consolidated with the holding company.
In November 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB issued EITF Abstract 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments (EITF 03-1) effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. This abstract provides guidelines on the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to investments, in addition to requiring quantitative and qualitative disclosures in the financial statements. These disclosures have been included in note 3 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In March 2004, the EITF issued a Consensus on Issue 03-1 (the Consensus) requiring that the provisions of EITF 03-1 be applied to cost-method investments for annual periods ending after June 30, 2004. The Consensus also requires several additional disclosures for cost-method investments. The recognition and measurement guidelines provided by the Consensus were scheduled to take effect in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. The FASB has delayed the effective date for the requirement to record the impairment losses under EITF 03-1. The Company has implemented the guidelines of this Consensus (see note 3). Adoption of the Consensus had no impact on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC) issued Statement of Position 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-3). SOP 03-3 is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The SOP addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investors initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those
35
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. The SOP does not apply to loans originated by the Bank. The Company is evaluating the requirements of implementation and plans to adopt the provisions beginning January 1, 2005.
In March 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments (SAB 105). SAB 105 is effective for loan commitments accounted for as derivatives and entered into subsequent to March 31, 2004. SAB 105 addresses the recognition timing of servicing assets only upon the separation from the underlying loan by sale or securitization of the loan with servicing retained. SAB 105 had no effect on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R) effective for the first reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123R is a revision of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 123R eliminates the alternative to apply the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees intrinsic value method of accounting for the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments. SFAS 123R provides for the initial measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The Company is evaluating the requirements of implementation and plans to adopt the provisions beginning July 1, 2005.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company engages in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, available lines of credit, standby letters of credit and trust preferred securities. The Company applies the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations for off-balance sheet instruments as it does for on-balance sheet credits. These obligations are reviewed quarterly as part of the determination of the Allowance to determine the appropriate reserve for loss needed for off-balance sheet arrangements. As of December 31, 2004, the reserve associated with financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk totaled $82,000.
The trust preferred securities were issued by Columbia Bancorp Statutory Trust I and Columbia Bancorp Statutory Trust II (the Trusts), unconsolidated subsidiaries of the Company created for the purpose of issuing the trust preferred securities. The securities mature in 2034. The Company and the Trusts believe that, taken together, the Companys obligations under the junior subordinated debentures, the Indenture, the Trust Agreement, and the Guarantee entered into in connection with the offerings of the trust preferred securities and the debentures, in the aggregate, constitute a full, irrevocable and unconditional guarantee of the Trusts obligations under the securities.
For a more detailed discussion of the Companys off-balance sheet arrangements, refer to Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and note 10 of the consolidated financial statements.
36
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business. Among these obligations are long-term FHLB advances, trust preferred securities, operating leases related to branch and administrative facilities, and a long-term contract with a data processing service provider (refer to note 9 of the consolidated financial statements). Payments required under these obligations, are set forth in the table below.
PAYMENT DUE BY PERIOD | |||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
TOTAL |
LESS THAN 1 YEAR |
1 3 YEARS |
3 5 YEARS |
MORE THAN 5 YEARS | ||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations |
$ | 30,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 20,000 | $ | 10,000 | |||||
Operating lease obligations |
11,817 | 2,219 | 3,320 | 1,925 | 4,353 | ||||||||||
Purchase obligations (a) |
6,030 | 1,270 | 2,540 | 2,220 | | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 47,847 | $ | 3,489 | $ | 5,860 | $ | 24,145 | $ | 14,353 | |||||
(a) | Includes significant information technology, telecommunications and data processing outsourcing contracts. Variable obligations, such as those based on transaction volumes, are not included. |
INVESTMENT CONSIDERATIONS - RISK FACTORS
The Companys Common Stock is traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (Nasdaq®) National Market tier of The Nasdaq Stock MarketSM under the symbol CBMD. A prospective investor should review and consider carefully the following risk factors, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report and included in the reports incorporated by reference, when evaluating an investment in the Companys Common Stock.
Growth Strategy and Possible Need for Additional Capital
The Company intends to continue its growth strategy, focused primarily on its ability to develop new account relationships, establish new branches, complete potential acquisitions, and generate loans and deposits at acceptable risk levels and on acceptable terms. While the Company believes that its capital is currently sufficient to support the Companys operations and anticipated expansion within its existing markets during at least the next twelve months and meets all regulatory requirements, other factors such as faster than anticipated growth, reduced earnings levels and revision in regulatory requirements may force the Company to seek additional capital. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in implementing, or will have the necessary regulatory capital to implement, its growth strategy. See Item 1. Business Regulation and Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Capital Resources.
Competition
The Company operates in a competitive environment, competing for deposits and loans with commercial banks, thrift institutions and other financial institutions that may possess greater financial resources than those available to the Company. These institutions may have substantially higher lending limits than the Company, and may provide certain services for their customers, such as trust and insurance services, which the Company does not currently offer directly to its customers. Additional competition for deposits comes from U.S. Government securities, private issuers of debt obligations and suppliers of other investment alternatives, such as securities firms. It is impossible to predict the competitive impact on the Company of certain federal and state legislation and/or regulations relating to the banking industry and interstate banking. See Item 1. Business Competition and Item 1. Business Regulation.
Economic Conditions and Monetary Policy
The operating results of the Company will depend to a great extent upon the rate differentials between the yields earned on its loans, securities and other earning assets and the rates paid on its deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. These rate differentials are highly sensitive to many factors beyond the control of the Company, including general economic conditions and the policies of various governmental and regulatory authorities, in particular the Federal Reserve Board. The makeup of the Companys loan and deposit portfolio, in particular, determines the Companys sensitivity to these factors. At December 31, 2004, the Company had a one year
37
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
cumulative interest sensitivity gap of $338.5 million (and a one year cumulative interest sensitivity gap ratio of 28.7%). See Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Like other depository institutions, the Company is affected by the monetary policies implemented by the Federal Reserve Board and other federal entities. A primary instrument of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve Board is the restriction or expansion of the money supply through open market operations, including the purchase and sale of government securities and the adjustment of reserve requirements. These actions may at times result in significant fluctuations in interest rates, which could have adverse effects on the operations of the Company. In particular, the Companys ability to make loans, attract deposits and realize gains on the sale of residential mortgage loans, as well as public demand for loans, could be adversely affected. See Item 1. Business Governmental Monetary Policies and Economic Controls.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The risk of credit loss varies with, among other things, general economic conditions, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan and, in the case of a collateralized loan, the value and marketability of the collateral for the loan. Management maintains an Allowance for credit losses based upon, among other things, historical loss experience in the loan portfolios, the levels and trends in past-due and nonaccrual loans, the status of nonaccrual loans and other loans identified as having the potential for further deterioration, credit risk and industry concentrations, trends in loan volume, the effects of any changes in lending policies and procedures or underwriting standards, and a continuing evaluation of the economic environment. Based upon such factors, management makes various assumptions and judgments about the ultimate collectability of the loan portfolio and provides an Allowance sufficient to absorb inherent losses within the portfolio. If managements assumptions and judgments prove to be incorrect and the Allowance is inadequate to absorb inherent losses, or if bank regulatory authorities require the Company to increase the Allowance, the Companys earnings could be significantly and adversely affected.
As of December 31, 2004, the Allowance was $11.6 million, or 1.22% of total loans, net of unearned income. Nonaccrual loans totaled $614,000 and accruing loans past-due 90 days or more totaled $31,000. The Company actively manages its nonperforming loans in an effort to minimize credit losses and monitors its asset quality to maintain an adequate Allowance. Although management believes the Allowance is adequate, there can be no assurance that the Allowance will prove sufficient to cover inherent credit losses. Further, although management uses the best information available to make determinations with respect to the Allowance, future adjustments may be necessary if economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used or adverse developments arise with respect to the Companys nonperforming or performing loans. Material additions to the Companys Allowance would result in a decrease in the Companys net income, possibly its capital, and could result in the inability to pay dividends, among other adverse consequences.
Liquidity
Liquidity is needed to fund the Companys financial obligations, including lending obligations, as well as the deposit withdrawal requirements of customers. These cash requirements are met on a daily basis through the inflow of deposit funds, and the maintenance of short-term overnight investments, maturities and calls in the Companys investment portfolio and available lines of credit with the FHLB and the FRB, which require pledged collateral. There can be no assurances, however, that deposit withdrawals and loan fundings will not exceed all available sources of liquidity on a short-term basis. Such a situation would have an adverse effect on the Companys ability to originate new loans and maintain reasonable loan and deposit interest rates, which would negatively impact earnings. For a more complete analysis of the Companys liquidity, see Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Companys interest rate risk represents the level of exposure it has to fluctuations in interest rates and is primarily measured as the change in earnings and the theoretical market value of equity that result from changes in interest rates. The Asset/Liability Management Committee of the Board of Directors (the ALCO) oversees the Companys management of interest rate risk. The objective of the management of interest rate risk is to optimize net interest income during periods of volatile as well as stable interest rates, while maintaining a balance between the maturity and repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities that is consistent with the Companys liquidity, asset and earnings growth, and capital adequacy goals. Critical to management of this process is the ALCOs interest rate program, designed to manage interest rate sensitivity (gap management) and balance sheet mix and pricing (spread management). Gap management represents those actions taken to measure and monitor rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities. Spread management requires managing investments, loans and funding sources to achieve an acceptable spread between the Companys return on its earning assets and its cost of funds.
One tool used by the Company to assess and manage its interest rate risk is the gap analysis. The gap analysis, summarized in the following table, measures the mismatch in repricing between interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and provides a
38
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
general indication of the interest sensitivity of the balance sheet at a specified point in time. By limiting the size of the gap position, the Company can limit the net interest income at risk arising from repricing imbalances. The following table summarizes the anticipated maturities or repricing of the Companys interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of December 31, 2004 and the Companys interest sensitivity gap at that date. The Companys cumulative sensitivity gap through twelve months is a positive 28.7%. A positive sensitivity gap for any time period indicates that more interest-earning assets will mature or reprice during that time period than interest-bearing liabilities. The Companys goal is generally to maintain a reasonably balanced cumulative interest sensitivity gap position for the period of one year or less in order to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates on liquidity, interest margins and corresponding operating results. During periods of falling interest rates, a short-term positive interest sensitivity gap position would generally result in a decrease in net interest income, and during periods of rising interest rates, a short-term positive interest sensitivity gap position would generally result in an increase in net interest income (assuming all earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are affected by a rate change equally and simultaneously).
It is important to note that the table represents the static gap position for interest sensitive assets and liabilities at December 31, 2004. The table does not give effect to prepayments or extensions of loans as a result of changes in general market rates. Moreover, while the table does indicate the opportunities to reprice assets and liabilities within certain time frames, it does not account for timing differences that occur during periods of repricing. For example, changes to deposit rates tend to lag in a rising rate environment and lead in a falling rate environment. All of the Companys interest-rate-sensitive instruments were entered into for purposes other than trading.
39
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
INTEREST SENSITIVITY PERIOD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
LESS THAN 3 MONTHS |
WAR(a) |
AFTER 3 THROUGH 12 MONTHS |
WAR(a) |
AFTER 1 THROUGH 2 YEARS |
WAR(a) |
AFTER 2 THROUGH 3 YEARS |
WAR(a) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits |
$ | 10,112 | 1.92 | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
35,000 | 3.43 | 64,725 | 3.29 | 13,941 | 3.03 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale |
14,365 | 3.92 | 511 | 6.00 | 36 | 5.51 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages originated for sale |
8,698 | 4.59 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (b): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
142,675 | 6.07 | 11,565 | 5.72 | 14,273 | 6.46 | 9,144 | 6.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate development and construction |
326,374 | 5.76 | 719 | 6.60 | 203 | 5.25 | 6,585 | 5.03 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
2,118 | 5.54 | 78 | 4.95 | 193 | 8.93 | 73 | 8.04 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
70,703 | 5.26 | 18,124 | 6.40 | 8,053 | 6.65 | 14,229 | 6.61 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer and other |
179,472 | 5.43 | 1,393 | 7.47 | 1,126 | 7.07 | 1,326 | 7.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
721,342 | 5.69 | 31,879 | 6.20 | 23,848 | 6.56 | 31,357 | 6.36 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
789,517 | 5.50 | 97,115 | 4.26 | 37,825 | 5.26 | 31,357 | 6.36 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts |
7,051 | 0.16 | 22,033 | 0.16 | 59,049 | 0.16 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Savings accounts |
14,320 | 0.25 | 42,117 | 0.25 | 27,797 | 0.25 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Money market accounts |
19,806 | 0.72 | 58,254 | 0.72 | 38,447 | 0.72 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
117,150 | 1.86 | 121,303 | 1.88 | 100,607 | 3.71 | 15,106 | 3.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
135,825 | 1.96 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
10,310 | 4.56 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
304,462 | 1.81 | 243,707 | 1.17 | 225,900 | 1.85 | 15,106 | 3.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest sensitivity gap |
$ | 485,055 | $ | (146,592 | ) | $ | (188,075 | ) | $ | 16,251 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap |
$ | 485,055 | $ | 338,463 | $ | 150,388 | $ | 166,639 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap as a percentage of total assets |
41.14 | % | 28.71 | % | 12.76 | % | 14.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Weighted average rate at December 31, 2004 presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. |
(b) | Loans receivable are stated before deducting unearned income and allowance for credit losses. The balance also excludes nonaccrual loans totaling $614,000. |
40
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
INTEREST SENSITIVITY PERIOD |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AFTER 3 THROUGH 4 YEARS |
WAR(a) |
AFTER 4 THROUGH 5 YEARS |
WAR(a) |
AFTER 5 YEARS |
WAR(a) |
TOTAL |
WAR(a) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | 10,112 | 1.92 | % | |||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
| | | | 2,504 | 9.29 | 116,170 | 3.43 | |||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale |
| | | | 33,068 | 5.49 | 47,980 | 5.04 | |||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgages originated for sale |
| | | | | | 8,698 | 4.59 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans (b): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
17,066 | 6.30 | 4,380 | 6.62 | 27,111 | 8.01 | 226,214 | 6.37 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate development and construction |
2,541 | 6.00 | | | 8,953 | 7.01 | 345,375 | 5.78 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential |
1,100 | 6.48 | 434 | 7.39 | 13,233 | 5.96 | 17,229 | 6.01 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
18,786 | 9.64 | 16,069 | 8.09 | 18,021 | 6.71 | 163,985 | 6.51 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer and other |
1,332 | 7.31 | 1,052 | 7.81 | 11,143 | 7.94 | 196,844 | 5.63 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
40,825 | 7.86 | 21,935 | 7.77 | 78,461 | 7.24 | 949,647 | 6.02 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
40,825 | 7.86 | 21,935 | 7.77 | 114,033 | 6.78 | 1,132,607 | 5.66 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts |
| | | | | | 88,133 | 0.16 | |||||||||||||||||||
Savings accounts |
| | | | | | 84,234 | 0.25 | |||||||||||||||||||
Money market accounts |
| | | | | | 116,507 | 0.72 | |||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
8,838 | 3.27 | 4,466 | 3.77 | 102 | 0.25 | 367,572 | 2.51 | |||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| | | | | | 135,825 | 1.96 | |||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
| | | | | | 10,310 | 4.56 | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
20,000 | 5.27 | | | | | 20,000 | 5.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
28,838 | 4.66 | 4,466 | 3.77 | 102 | 0.25 | 822,581 | 1.78 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest sensitivity gap |
$ | 11,987 | $ | 17,469 | $ | 113,931 | $ | 310,026 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap |
$ | 178,626 | $ | 196,095 | $ | 310,026 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap as a percentage of total assets |
15.15 | % | 16.63 | % | 26.30 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Weighted average rate at December 31, 2004 presented on a fully taxable-equivalent basis. |
(b) | Loans receivable are stated before deducting unearned income and allowance for credit losses. The balance also excludes nonaccrual loans totaling $614,000. |
The analysis provided in the table above includes the following significant assumptions: Fixed-rate loans are scheduled by contractual maturity and variable-rate loans are scheduled by repricing date. Variable-rate loans that have reached a pre-established interest rate floor are classified as fixed-rate loans and reprice according to contractual maturity. Investments other than mortgage-backed securities are scheduled according to the earlier of contractual maturity date or most likely call date, given current interest rates. Mortgage-backed securities are scheduled according to estimated maturity based upon the most recent monthly prepayment factors, which may change. Residential mortgage loans originated for sale are scheduled based on their expected sale dates, generally 14 to 30
41
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
days after settlement. Projected run-off of deposits that do not have a contractual maturity date, such as NOW, savings and money market accounts, are computed based upon the most recently proposed decay rate assumptions set forth by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC). Penalty-free certificates of deposit are scheduled by stated maturity date. If rates begin to increase, a portion of these certificates may reprice prior to contractual maturity. Long-term advances from the FHLB are scheduled according to their maturity date.
The Company also uses a computer simulation analysis to assess and manage its interest rate risk. The simulation analysis assumes an immediate, parallel shift of 200 basis points in the Treasury Yield Curve. During 2001, as market rates approached historically low levels, the Company adjusted the assumptions used in the simulation process to incorporate interest rate floors for certain deposit products, recognizing the practical concept that rates on interest-bearing products would not reprice below a certain point. The analysis measures the potential change in earnings over a one-year time horizon and in the market value of portfolio equity, captures optionality factors such as call features embedded in the investment portfolio and caps or floors embedded in loan portfolio contracts, and includes assumptions as to the timing and magnitude of movements in interest rates associated with the Companys funding sources not fixed in price. Measured based on December 31, 2004 data, the simulation analysis provided the following profile of the Companys interest rate risk:
IMMEDIATE RATE CHANGE |
POLICY |
||||||||
+200BP |
-200BP |
||||||||
Net interest income at risk |
3.81 | % | -7.64 | % | +/-15.0 | % | |||
Economic value of equity |
-6.94 | % | 4.88 | % | +/-20.0 | % |
Both of the above tools used to assess interest rate risk have strengths and weaknesses. Because the gap analysis reflects a static position at a single point in time, it is limited in quantifying the total impact of market rate changes which do not affect all earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities equally or simultaneously. In addition, gap reports depict the existing structure, excluding exposure arising from new business. While the simulation process is a powerful tool in analyzing interest rate sensitivity, many of the assumptions used in the process are highly qualitative and subjective and are subject to the risk that past historical activity may not generate accurate predictions of the future. Both measurement tools taken together, however, provide an effective evaluation of the Companys exposure to changes in interest rates, enabling management to better control the volatility of earnings.
42
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
December 31, 2004 and 2003
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||
Assets |
|||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 30,012 | $ | 35,846 | |||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks |
10,112 | 3,497 | |||||
Investment securities held-to-maturity fair value $115,964 in 2004 and $78,028 in 2003 |
116,170 | 77,344 | |||||
Securities available-for-sale |
47,980 | 56,583 | |||||
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale |
8,698 | 6,046 | |||||
Loan receivables: |
|||||||
Real estate - development and construction |
345,375 | 283,599 | |||||
Commercial |
226,763 | 221,374 | |||||
Real estate - mortgage: |
|||||||
Residential |
17,272 | 16,349 | |||||
Commercial |
163,985 | 143,723 | |||||
Consumer, principally residential equity lines of credit and second mortgages |
196,198 | 169,298 | |||||
Other |
668 | 1,504 | |||||
Total loans |
950,261 | 835,847 | |||||
Less: |
|||||||
Unearned income, net of origination costs |
91 | 363 | |||||
Allowance for credit losses |
11,583 | 10,828 | |||||
Loans, net |
938,587 | 824,656 | |||||
Property and equipment, net |
6,647 | 7,332 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
20,800 | 17,951 | |||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,179,006 | $ | 1,029,255 | |||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|||||||
Deposits: |
|||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 256,132 | $ | 206,323 | |||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
|||||||
Savings and checking |
288,874 | 286,500 | |||||
Certificates of deposit: |
|||||||
Under $100,000 |
238,580 | 206,047 | |||||
$100,000 and over |
128,992 | 88,738 | |||||
Total deposits |
912,578 | 787,608 | |||||
Short-term borrowings |
135,825 | 128,844 | |||||
Subordinated debentures |
10,310 | | |||||
Long-term borrowings |
20,000 | 20,000 | |||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
7,945 | 7,354 | |||||
Total liabilities |
1,086,658 | 943,806 | |||||
Stockholders equity: |
|||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value per share; authorized 10,000,000 shares; outstanding 7,114,267 and 7,170,882 shares at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively |
71 | 72 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital |
45,739 | 47,886 | |||||
Retained earnings |
46,419 | 37,561 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
119 | (70 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
92,348 | 85,449 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,179,006 | $ | 1,029,255 | |||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 | |||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 52,245 | $ | 44,962 | $ | 43,649 | ||||
Investment securities |
5,062 | 6,161 | 8,605 | |||||||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks |
239 | 280 | 312 | |||||||
Total interest income |
57,546 | 51,403 | 52,566 | |||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||
Deposits |
9,340 | 8,814 | 12,549 | |||||||
Borrowings |
2,623 | 1,922 | 2,930 | |||||||
Total interest expense |
11,963 | 10,736 | 15,479 | |||||||
Net interest income |
45,583 | 40,667 | 37,087 | |||||||
Provision for credit losses |
728 | 1,170 | 835 | |||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
44,855 | 39,497 | 36,252 | |||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||||
Fees charged for services |
3,718 | 3,994 | 3,570 | |||||||
Gains and fees on sales of mortgage loans, net of costs |
1,437 | 2,955 | 2,098 | |||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities |
| 28 | 2 | |||||||
Gains (losses) on sales of property and equipment, net |
| (10 | ) | 757 | ||||||
Net income on other real estate owned |
59 | 22 | 110 | |||||||
Commissions earned on financial services sales |
589 | 606 | 300 | |||||||
Other |
995 | 1,368 | 1,108 | |||||||
Total noninterest income |
6,798 | 8,963 | 7,945 | |||||||
Noninterest expense: |
||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
16,931 | 16,451 | 14,784 | |||||||
Occupancy, net |
3,950 | 3,818 | 3,340 | |||||||
Equipment |
1,912 | 1,958 | 1,852 | |||||||
Data processing |
1,969 | 1,955 | 1,656 | |||||||
Marketing |
929 | 1,038 | 887 | |||||||
Professional fees |
945 | 663 | 242 | |||||||
Cash management services |
548 | 579 | 639 | |||||||
Stationery and supplies |
491 | 459 | 464 | |||||||
Postage |
379 | 385 | 336 | |||||||
Deposit insurance |
202 | 196 | 179 | |||||||
Other |
2,789 | 2,468 | 2,787 | |||||||
Total noninterest expense |
31,045 | 29,970 | 27,166 | |||||||
Income before income taxes |
20,608 | 18,490 | 17,031 | |||||||
Income tax provision |
7,323 | 6,586 | 6,160 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 13,285 | $ | 11,904 | $ | 10,871 | ||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.86 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 1.53 | ||||
Diluted |
1.80 | 1.62 | 1.50 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
COMMON STOCK |
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL |
RETAINED EARNINGS |
ACCUMULATED OTHER |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2001 |
$ | 71 | $ | 47,520 | $ | 21,768 | $ | 3 | $ | 69,362 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 10,871 | | 10,871 | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on securities available-for sale, net of tax effect (unrealized gains on securities of $4, including a reclassification adjustment for gains of $2) |
| | | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | 10,873 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
| | (3,231 | ) | | (3,231 | ) | |||||||||||||
Exercise of options for 14,369 shares of common stock |
| 77 | | | 77 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase of 10,000 shares of common stock |
| (158 | ) | | | (158 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2002 |
71 | 47,439 | 29,408 | 5 | 76,923 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 11,904 | | 11,904 | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on securities available-for sale, net of $48 tax effect (unrealized losses on securities of $123, including a reclassification adjustment for gains of $40) |
| | | (75 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | 11,829 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
| | (3,751 | ) | | (3,751 | ) | |||||||||||||
Exercise of options for 61,275 shares of common stock |
1 | 447 | | | 448 | |||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2003 |
72 | 47,886 | 37,561 | (70 | ) | 85,449 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 13,285 | | 13,285 | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on securities available-for sale, net of $123 tax effect (unrealized gains on securities of $312) |
| | | 189 | 189 | |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | 13,474 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared on common stock |
| | (4,427 | ) | | (4,427 | ) | |||||||||||||
Exercise of options for 36,931 shares of common stock |
| 524 | | | 524 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase of 93,546 shares of common stock |
(1 | ) | (2,671 | ) | | | (2,672 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2004 |
$ | 71 | $ | 45,739 | $ | 46,419 | $ | 119 | $ | 92,348 | ||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 13,285 | $ | 11,904 | $ | 10,871 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,849 | 1,798 | 1,803 | |||||||||
Amortization of loan fee income |
(2,768 | ) | (2,125 | ) | (1,254 | ) | ||||||
Provision for credit losses |
728 | 1,170 | 835 | |||||||||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
548 | 927 | 130 | |||||||||
Provision for losses on other real estate owned |
| | 20 | |||||||||
Gains on sales of other real estate owned |
(73 | ) | (44 | ) | (155 | ) | ||||||
Gains and fees on sales of mortgage loans, net of costs |
(1,437 | ) | (2,955 | ) | (2,098 | ) | ||||||
(Gains) losses on sales/disposals of property and equipment, net |
| 10 | (757 | ) | ||||||||
(Gains) losses on sales of other assets |
7 | | (53 | ) | ||||||||
Gains on sales of investment securities |
| (28 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sales of residential mortgage loans originated for sale |
126,899 | 293,926 | 189,460 | |||||||||
Disbursements for residential mortgage loans originated for sale |
(128,114 | ) | (286,502 | ) | (186,466 | ) | ||||||
Loan fees deferred, net of origination costs |
2,496 | 2,045 | 1,058 | |||||||||
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets |
(2,701 | ) | (1,053 | ) | (675 | ) | ||||||
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
457 | 604 | 1,522 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
11,176 | 19,677 | 14,239 | |||||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Loan disbursements in excess of principal repayments |
(143,452 | ) | (143,785 | ) | (52,711 | ) | ||||||
Loan purchases |
(18,116 | ) | (34,932 | ) | (26,770 | ) | ||||||
Loan sales |
46,931 | 8,958 | 16,971 | |||||||||
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity |
(106,931 | ) | (60,625 | ) | (75,521 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of securities available-for-sale |
(3,876 | ) | (32,139 | ) | (1,262 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and principal repayments of securities held-to-maturity |
68,092 | 95,710 | 84,569 | |||||||||
Proceeds from maturities and principal repayments of securities available-for-sale |
12,392 | 13,575 | 10,654 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale |
| 777 | 42 | |||||||||
Additions to other real estate owned |
| | (95 | ) | ||||||||
Sales of other real estate owned |
323 | 222 | 1,239 | |||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(1,010 | ) | (1,990 | ) | (669 | ) | ||||||
Disposals of property and equipment |
| 2 | 3,118 | |||||||||
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance |
(258 | ) | (298 | ) | (321 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(145,905 | ) | (154,525 | ) | (40,756 | ) | ||||||
(continued)
46
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
$ | 124,970 | $ | 56,995 | $ | 92,612 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
6,981 | (19,059 | ) | 30,551 | ||||||||
Issuance of subordinated debentures |
10,000 | | | |||||||||
Cash dividends distributed on common stock |
(4,293 | ) | (3,564 | ) | (3,124 | ) | ||||||
Net proceeds from stock options exercised |
524 | 448 | 77 | |||||||||
Purchase of common stock |
(2,672 | ) | | (158 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
135,510 | 34,820 | 119,958 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
781 | (100,028 | ) | 93,441 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
39,343 | 139,371 | 45,930 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 40,124 | $ | 39,343 | $ | 139,371 | ||||||
Supplemental information: |
||||||||||||
Interest paid on deposits and borrowings |
$ | 11,843 | $ | 10,815 | $ | 15,757 | ||||||
Income taxes paid |
7,150 | 7,600 | 5,555 | |||||||||
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned |
250 | | | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
MANAGEMENTS STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITIES
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
Management acknowledges its responsibility for financial reporting (both audited and unaudited) which provides a fair representation of the Companys financial position and results of operations and is reliable and relevant to a meaningful understanding of the Companys business.
Management has prepared the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, making appropriate estimates and judgments, and considering materiality. Except for tax equivalency adjustments made to enhance comparative analyses, all financial information presented elsewhere in this annual report is consistent with the information presented in the audited consolidated financial statements.
Oversight of the Companys auditing and financial reporting processes is provided by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which consists of outside directors. This Committee meets on a regular basis with the internal auditor, who reports directly to the Committee, to approve the audit schedule and scope, discuss the adequacy of the internal control system and the quality of financial reporting, review audit reports and discuss findings and actions taken to address them. The Committee also reviews the Companys annual report to shareholders on Form 10-K. The Audit Committee meets regularly with the external auditors, and has direct and private access to them at any time.
The independent registered public accounting firm of KPMG LLP has audited the Companys consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. As indicated in the report of independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG is responsible for conducting the audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) in order to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.
/s/ John M. Bond, Jr. | /s/ John A. Scaldara, Jr. | /s/ James P. Radick | ||||||
John M. Bond, Jr. | John A. Scaldara, Jr. | James P. Radick | ||||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | President, Chief Operating Officer | Chief Financial Officer |
48
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Columbia Bancorp:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Columbia Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Columbia Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Columbia Bancorps internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 11, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP |
Baltimore, Maryland |
March 11, 2005
49
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting and reporting policies of Columbia Bancorp and subsidiary (the Company) conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The following is a description of the more significant of these policies.
Organization
The Company was formed November 16, 1987 and is a Maryland corporation chartered as a bank holding company. The Company holds all the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of The Columbia Bank (the Bank). The Bank is a Maryland trust company that engages in general commercial banking operations. Deposits in the Bank are insured, subject to regulatory limitations, by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC).
The Bank provides comprehensive and service-intensive commercial and retail banking services to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses. Services offered by the Bank include a variety of loans and a broad spectrum of commercial and consumer financial services.
Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include all accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Columbia Bank. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Certain amounts for prior years have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for 2004. These reclassifications have no effect on stockholders equity or net income as previously reported.
Use of estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for credit losses (the Allowance), other than temporary impairment of investment securities and deferred tax assets. In connection with the determination of the Allowance, management prepares fair value analyses and obtains independent appraisals as necessary. Management believes that the Allowance is sufficient to address the losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the Allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination processes, periodically review the Banks Allowance. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the Allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations.
Securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in their value is other than temporary. The term other than temporary is not intended to indicate a permanent decline in value. Rather, it means that the prospects for near term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support fair values equal to, or greater than, the carrying value of the investment. Management reviews criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the decline, as well as the reasons for the decline, to predict whether the loss in value is other than temporary. Once a decline in value is determined to be other than temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized.
A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax assets when, in the judgment of management, it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not become realizable. The judgment about the level of future taxable income is dependent to a great extent on matters that may, at least in part, be beyond the Companys control. It is at least reasonably possible that managements judgment about the need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets could change in the near term.
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Federal funds sold
Federal funds sold are carried at cost, which approximates fair value, and are generally sold for one-day periods.
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
Investments held-to-maturity are those securities which the Company has the ability and positive intent to hold until maturity. Securities so classified at the time of purchase are recorded at cost. Carrying values of securities held-to-maturity are adjusted for premium amortization to the earlier of the maturity or expected call date and discount accretion to the maturity date. Declines in the fair value of individual held-to-maturity securities below their cost, that are other than temporary, result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value. Factors affecting the determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred include a downgrading of the security by the rating agency, a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer, or that management would not have the ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Marketable equity securities and debt securities not classified as held-to-maturity or trading are classified as available-for-sale. Securities available-for-sale are acquired as part of the Companys asset/liability management strategy and may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, loan demand, changes in prepayment risk and other factors. Securities available-for-sale are recorded at their fair value and unrealized holding gains or losses, net of the related tax effect, are excluded from earnings and reported as an item of other comprehensive income until realized. The carrying values of securities available-for-sale are adjusted for premium amortization to the earlier of the maturity or expected call date and discount accretion to the maturity date. Realized gains and losses, using the specific identification method, are included as a separate component of noninterest income. Related interest and dividends are included in interest income. Declines in the fair value of individual available-for-sale securities below their cost that are other than temporary result in write-downs of the individual securities to their fair value. Factors affecting the determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred include a downgrading of the security by a rating agency, a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the issuer, or that management would not have the intent and ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Other equity securities represent Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock, which are considered restricted as to marketability.
Transfers of securities between categories are recorded at fair value on the date of transfer. The accumulated unrealized holding gains or losses on debt securities at the time of a transfer from securities available-for-sale to securities held-to-maturity are amortized into earnings over the remaining life of the security as an adjustment to yield.
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market, which may be indicated by the committed sale price, determined on an individual basis.
51
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Loans receivable
Loans are stated at the amount of unpaid principal reduced by unearned income and the allowance for credit losses. Unearned income consists of commitment and origination fees, net of origination costs. The Company determines the delinquency status of loans based on contractual loan terms. Loans are generally placed in nonaccrual status when they are past-due 90 days as to either principal or interest or when, in the opinion of management, the collection of all interest and/or principal is in doubt. A loan remains in nonaccrual status until the loan is current as to payment of both principal and interest and the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay and remain current. Management may grant a waiver from nonaccrual status for a 90-day past-due loan that is both well secured and in the process of collection.
A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A loan is not considered impaired during a period of delay in payment if the Company expects to collect all amounts due, including interest past-due. The Company generally considers a period of delay in payment to include delinquency up to 90 days.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan (SFAS No. 114), the Company measures impaired loans: (i) at the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate; (ii) at the observable market price; or (iii) at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance and corresponding provision for credit losses.
SFAS No. 114 does not apply to larger groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans such as consumer installment, residential first and second mortgage loans and credit card loans. These loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. The Companys impaired loans are, therefore, comprised primarily of commercial loans, including commercial mortgage loans, and real estate development and construction loans. In addition, impaired loans are generally loans which management has placed in nonaccrual status. The Company recognizes interest income for impaired loans consistent with its method for nonaccrual loans. Specifically, interest payments received are normally applied to principal. An impaired loan is charged off when the loan, or a portion thereof, is considered uncollectible.
The Company provides for credit losses through the establishment of the Allowance by provisions charged against earnings. The Companys objective is to ensure that the Allowance is adequate to cover probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the date of each statement of condition. Management considers a number of factors in estimating the required level of the Allowance. These factors include: historical loss experience in the loan portfolios; the levels and trends in past-due and nonaccrual loans; the status of nonaccrual loans and other loans identified as having the potential for further deterioration; credit risk and industry concentrations; trends in loan volume; the effects of any changes in lending policies and procedures or underwriting standards; and, a continuing evaluation of the economic environment. The Companys estimate of the required Allowance is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the effects of economic and market conditions on borrowers.
Real estate properties acquired in satisfaction of loans
Real estate properties acquired in satisfaction of loans are reported in other real estate owned and are recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less selling costs. Subsequent write-downs are included in noninterest income, along with operating income and expenses of such properties and gains or losses realized upon disposition.
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are charged to operating expenses. Depreciation generally is computed on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally range from three to ten years for furniture and equipment, three to five years for computer software and hardware, and ten to forty years for buildings and leasehold improvements. Leasehold improvements are generally amortized over the lesser of the terms of the related leases or the lives of the assets, whichever is shorter. The costs of significant purchases, renewals and betterments are capitalized, while the costs of ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and included in noninterest expense.
Any gain or loss on the sale of an asset is treated as an adjustment to the basis of its replacement, if traded in, or as an income or expense item, if sold. Leases are accounted for as operating leases since none meet the criteria for capitalization.
Income taxes
The Company and its subsidiary file a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities based on enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. However, deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that they will be realized based upon consideration of available evidence, including tax planning strategies and other factors.
52
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Per share data and net income per common share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed after adjusting the numerator and denominator of the basic EPS computation for the effects of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effects of options, discussed in note 11, and their equivalents are computed using the treasury stock method.
Information relating to the calculations of earnings per common share is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:
AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, (EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 | |||||||||||||||
BASIC |
DILUTED |
BASIC |
DILUTED |
BASIC |
DILUTED | |||||||||||||
Net income used in EPS computation |
$ | 13,285 | $ | 13,285 | $ | 11,904 | $ | 11,904 | $ | 10,871 | $ | 10,871 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
7,148 | 7,148 | 7,134 | 7,134 | 7,100 | 7,100 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive securities |
| 243 | | 236 | | 163 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted weighted average shares used in EPS computation |
7,148 | 7,391 | 7,134 | 7,370 | 7,100 | 7,263 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share |
$ | 1.86 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 1.62 | $ | 1.53 | $ | 1.50 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation
The Company uses the intrinsic value method to account for stock-based employee compensation plans. Under this method, compensation cost is recognized for awards of shares of common stock to employees only if the quoted market price of the stock at the grant date (or other measurement date, if later) is greater than the amount the employee must pay to acquire the stock. The following table summarizes the pro forma effect on net earnings and earnings per share of common stock using an optional fair value method, rather than the intrinsic value method, to account for stock-based compensation awarded since 1995.
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 13,285 | $ | 11,904 | $ | 10,871 | ||||||
Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net earnings, net of related tax effects |
| | | |||||||||
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method, net of related tax effects |
(663 | ) | (237 | ) | (280 | ) | ||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 12,622 | $ | 11,667 | $ | 10,591 | ||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1.86 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 1.53 | ||||||
Pro forma |
1.77 | 1.64 | 1.49 | |||||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||
As reported |
1.80 | 1.62 | 1.50 | |||||||||
Pro forma |
1.71 | 1.58 | 1.46 | |||||||||
The per share weighted average fair values of options granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $10.05, $10.38 and $7.51, respectively. These values were estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following weighted average assumptions:
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
Dividend yield |
1.90 | % | 2.10 | % | 2.41 | % | |||
Expected volatility |
27.87 | % | 37.22 | % | 37.83 | % | |||
Risk-free interest rate |
3.99 | % | 4.05 | % | 4.81 | % | |||
Expected lives |
8 years | 10 years | 10 years |
53
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Statements of Cash Flows
For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks.
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in stockholders equity during a period, except those relating to investments by and distributions to stockholders. The Companys comprehensive income consists of net earnings and unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale and is presented in the statements of stockholders equity. Accumulated other comprehensive income is displayed as a separate component of stockholders equity.
Recent Accounting Developments
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (Interpretation No. 46), which explains identification of variable interest entities and the assessment of whether to consolidate those entities. FIN 46 Revised (FIN 46R), issued in December 2003, replaces FIN 46. FIN 46R requires public entities to apply FIN 46 or FIN 46R to all entities that are considered variable interest entities, in practice and under the FASB literature that was applied before the issuance of FIN 46, by the end of the first reporting period that ends after December 15, 2003. For any variable interest entities (VIE) that must be consolidated under FIN 46R, the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests of the VIE initially would be measured at their carrying amounts with any difference between the net amount added to the statement of condition and any previously recognized interest being recognized as the cumulative effect of an accounting change. If determining the carrying amounts is not practicable, fair value at the date FIN 46R first applies may be used to measure the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interest of the VIE. FIN 46R requires deconsolidation and re-characterization of the underlying consolidated debt obligation from the trust preferred securities obligation to the junior subordinated debenture obligation that exists between a company and its statutory trusts. In June 2004 and December 2004, the Company issued trust preferred securities through two wholly-owned statutory trusts formed for that purpose. In accordance with FIN 46R, the statutory trusts have not been consolidated with the holding company.
In November 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB issued EITF Abstract 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments (EITF 03-1) effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. This abstract provides guidelines on the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application to investments, in addition to requiring quantitative and qualitative disclosures in the financial statements. These disclosures have been included in note 3. In March 2004, the EITF issued a Consensus on Issue 03-1 (the Consensus) requiring that the provisions of EITF 03-1 be applied to cost-method investments for annual periods ending after June 30, 2004. The Consensus also requires several additional disclosures for cost-method investments. The recognition and measurement guidelines provided by the Consensus were
54
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
scheduled to take effect in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. The FASB has delayed the effective date for the requirement to record the impairment losses under EITF 03-1. The Company has implemented the guidelines of this Consensus (see note 3). Adoption of the Consensus had no impact on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC) issued Statement of Position 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-3). SOP 03-3 is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. The SOP addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investors initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. The SOP does not apply to loans originated by the Bank. The Company is evaluating the requirements of implementation and plans to adopt the provisions beginning January 1, 2005.
In March 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments (SAB 105). SAB 105 is effective for loan commitments accounted for as derivatives and entered into subsequent to March 31, 2004. SAB 105 addresses the recognition timing of servicing assets only upon the separation from the underlying loan by sale or securitization of the loan with servicing retained. SAB 105 had no effect on the Companys financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R) effective for the first reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 123R is a revision of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 123R eliminates the alternative to apply the Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees intrinsic value method of accounting for the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments. SFAS 123R provides for the initial measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The Company is evaluating the requirements of implementation and plans to adopt the provisions beginning July 1, 2005.
Subsequent Events
On February 1, 2005, the Company purchased a block of 218,345 shares of its Common Stock in a private transaction with an unaffiliated third party at a price of $32.20 per share. The shares were purchased in accordance with the Companys Stock Repurchase Plan (the Program), which was announced in October 2000 and updated in June 2004. The Program provides authorization to purchase up to 500,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock. Subsequent to the February 2005 purchase, there were 101,659 remaining shares available for purchase under the program.
NOTE 2: RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
The Bank is required by the Federal Reserve System to maintain certain cash reserve balances based principally on deposit liabilities. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the required reserve balances were $18.9 million and $12.4 million, respectively.
55
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 3: SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY AND SECURITIES AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale were as follows at December 31, 2004:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMORTIZED COST |
GROSS UNREALIZED GAINS |
GROSS UNREALIZED LOSSES |
ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE | ||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
$ | 113,666 | $ | 98 | $ | 328 | $ | 113,436 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
500 | 24 | | 524 | ||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
2,004 | | | 2,004 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 116,170 | $ | 122 | $ | 328 | $ | 115,964 | ||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
$ | 1,000 | $ | 14 | $ | | $ | 1,014 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
28,669 | 161 | 201 | 28,629 | ||||||||
Trust preferred stocks |
13,162 | 82 | 155 | 13,089 | ||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
3,833 | | | 3,833 | ||||||||
Other equity securities |
1,119 | 341 | 45 | 1,415 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 47,783 | $ | 598 | $ | 401 | $ | 47,980 | ||||
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale were as follows at December 31, 2003:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMORTIZED COST |
GROSS UNREALIZED GAINS |
GROSS UNREALIZED LOSSES |
ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE | ||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
$ | 73,865 | $ | 688 | $ | 72 | $ | 74,481 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
3,479 | 68 | | 3,547 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 77,344 | $ | 756 | $ | 72 | $ | 78,028 | ||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||
Federal agency securities |
$ | 5,500 | $ | 113 | $ | | $ | 5,613 | ||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
31,298 | 130 | 145 | 31,283 | ||||||||
Trust preferred stocks |
15,904 | 245 | 322 | 15,827 | ||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
2,620 | | | 2,620 | ||||||||
Other equity securities |
1,377 | 53 | 190 | 1,240 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 56,699 | $ | 541 | $ | 657 | $ | 56,583 | ||||
The Company is required to maintain an investment in the stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) in an amount equal to .20% of the Banks total assets at the end of the prior year, plus 4.65% of total outstanding advances from the FHLB. The Companys investment in FHLB stock is not readily marketable and is, therefore, carried at cost.
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of nonequity securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2004 and 2003, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.
56
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMORTIZED COST |
ESTIMATED FAIR |
AMORTIZED COST |
ESTIMATED FAIR | ||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 2,226 | $ | 2,251 | $ | 26,019 | $ | 26,495 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
111,440 | 111,185 | 47,846 | 47,986 | ||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed securities |
2,504 | 2,528 | 3,479 | 3,547 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 116,170 | $ | 115,964 | $ | 77,344 | $ | 78,028 | ||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 1,000 | $ | 1,014 | $ | 4,500 | $ | 4,552 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
| | 1,000 | 1,061 | ||||||||
Due after ten years |
13,162 | 13,089 | 15,904 | 15,827 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
28,669 | 28,629 | 31,298 | 31,283 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 42,831 | $ | 42,732 | $ | 52,702 | $ | 52,723 | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of securities available-for-sale in 2003 were $777,000, which included gross gains of $28,000. Proceeds from the sale of securities available-for-sale in 2002 were $42,000, which included gross gains of $2,000. There were no sales of securities held-to-maturity or securities available-for sale in 2004. The Company uses the specific identification method to determine the cost basis of investment securities for the purpose of computing gains or losses on sales.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had $9,000 in net unrealized losses, and net unrealized gains of $676,000 at December 31, 2003. The table below shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of December 31, 2004.
LESS THAN 12 MONTHS |
12 MONTHS OR MORE |
TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
FAIR VALUE |
UNREALIZED LOSS |
FAIR VALUE |
UNREALIZED LOSS |
FAIR VALUE |
UNREALIZED LOSS | ||||||||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored agencies |
$ | 56,172 | $ | 328 | $ | | $ | | $ | 56,172 | $ | 328 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
12,075 | 110 | 6,415 | 91 | 18,490 | 201 | ||||||||||||
Trust preferred stocks |
| | 6,061 | 155 | 6,061 | 155 | ||||||||||||
Total debt securities |
68,247 | 438 | 12,476 | 246 | 80,723 | 684 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
| | 310 | 45 | 310 | 45 | ||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
$ | 68,247 | $ | 438 | $ | 12,786 | $ | 291 | $ | 81,033 | $ | 729 | ||||||
The table below shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of December 31, 2003.
LESS THAN 12 MONTHS |
12 MONTHS OR MORE |
TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
FAIR VALUE |
UNREALIZED LOSS |
FAIR VALUE |
UNREALIZED LOSS |
FAIR VALUE |
UNREALIZED LOSS | ||||||||||||
Securities of U.S. Government sponsored agencies |
$ | 20,428 | $ | 72 | $ | | $ | | $ | 20,428 | $ | 72 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
16,734 | 145 | | | 16,734 | 145 | ||||||||||||
Trust preferred stocks |
| | 7,831 | 322 | 7,831 | 322 | ||||||||||||
Total debt securities |
37,162 | 217 | 7,831 | 322 | 44,993 | 539 | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
| | 884 | 190 | 884 | 190 | ||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
$ | 37,162 | $ | 217 | $ | 8,715 | $ | 512 | $ | 45,877 | $ | 729 | ||||||
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Unrealized losses in the investment portfolio change as market rates change. The average lives of agency securities will be extended as rates increase since the call options on these securities will probably not be extended. The value of those securities will, therefore, decline since the opportunity to reinvest at higher rates will be delayed. Mortgage-backed securities in an unrealized loss position are the pools that have low coupon rates and, as mortgage rates have risen, the prepayments, or refinancing of the underlying mortgages, has slowed. Trust preferred securities that are valued below book value have variable rates and reprice quarterly, which, theoretically, should limit market fluctuations as rates change. The losses reflected are primarily due to current market conditions in which new issues of variable rate trust preferred stocks are priced at wider spreads than those in the portfolio. Reported losses will decline if the spreads for new issues decline. The investment in equity securities represents an investment in the common stock of two de novo banks located in the Companys marketplace. The unrealized loss in the equity securities reflects the accumulated losses by the de novo banks since their start-up. The unrealized loss has been steadily declining as earnings have improved.
Reported unrealized gains or losses in the Companys securities held-to-maturity portfolio are primarily rate-driven. The Company has the intent and the ability to hold all of these securities to maturity. The average life of the agency portfolio, which constitutes 70% of the total portfolio, is approximately 26.0 months, a relatively short-term average life portfolio by industry standards. Management has, therefore, determined that the unrealized losses in the portfolio are temporary in nature.
At December 31, 2004, securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale were pledged as collateral for the following purposes:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMORTIZED COST |
ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE | ||||
FHLB borrowings |
$ | 59,778 | $ | 59,635 | ||
Repurchase agreements |
68,589 | 68,335 | ||||
Federal Reserve Bank |
500 | 511 | ||||
Public deposits |
3,500 | 3,509 | ||||
Total |
$ | 132,367 | $ | 131,990 | ||
NOTE 4: NONPERFORMING ASSETS, IMPAIRED LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Nonperforming assets and loans past-due 90 days or more but not in nonaccrual status were as follows at December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 | ||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 614 | $ | 892 | ||
Other real estate owned |
| | ||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 614 | $ | 892 | ||
Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more |
$ | 31 | $ | 72 | ||
At December 31, 2004, nonaccrual loans totaled $614,000 and consisted primarily of four commercial relationships totaling $549,000, of which $468,000 was guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (the SBA). In accordance with standard industry practices, no interest was recorded on these commercial loans while they were in nonaccrual status. Had the loans not been in nonaccrual status, the Company would have recognized $32,000 in additional interest income during 2004. Nonaccrual loans also include four consumer loans totaling $22,000 and one mortgage loan carried at $43,000.
Impaired loans totaled $549,000 and $827,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. At December 31, 2003, $100,000 were collateral dependent. Collateral dependent loans are measured based on the fair value of the collateral. Impaired loans that are not collateral dependent are measured at the present value of expected future cash flows using the loans effective interest rates. There were no impaired loans that were collateral dependent at December 31, 2004. Specific reserves assigned to impaired loans totaled $51,000 at December 31, 2004 and $13,000 at December 31, 2003.
The average recorded investment in impaired loans and the amounts of income recognized on a cash basis were as follows during the years ended December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 | ||||||
Average recorded investment in impaired loans |
$ | 823 | $ | 730 | $ | 488 | |||
Interest income recognized on a cash basis during impairment |
| 5 | | ||||||
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
An analysis of the allowance for credit losses is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 10,828 | $ | 8,839 | $ | 8,024 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses |
728 | 1,170 | 835 | |||||||||
Charge-offs |
(276 | ) | (470 | ) | (535 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries |
303 | 1,289 | 515 | |||||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 11,583 | $ | 10,828 | $ | 8,839 | ||||||
Ratio of allowance to loans, net of unearned income |
1.22 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.33 | % | ||||||
NOTE 5: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Bank has made loans to certain of its executive officers and directors. These loans were made on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral requirements, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated customers. The risk of loss on these loans is considered to be no greater than for loans made to unrelated customers. The following schedule summarizes changes in amounts of loans outstanding to executive officers and directors for the years ended December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 13,746 | $ | 11,696 | $ | 6,345 | ||||||
Additions |
13,039 | 10,680 | 12,433 | |||||||||
Repayments |
(7,865 | ) | (8,630 | ) | (7,082 | ) | ||||||
Less balances for retired directors |
(66 | ) | | | ||||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 18,854 | $ | 13,746 | $ | 11,696 | ||||||
In November 1997, the Bank acquired through foreclosure a 75% interest in a residential development project consisting of 262 residential building lots in various stages of development. Also, in November 1997, the Bank engaged The Michael Companies, Inc., a real estate development company owned solely by Mr. Kenneth Michael, a director of the Company, to serve as development and marketing manager with respect to the project. The final lots in the project were delivered in February 2003. The Michael Companies, Inc. earned a development fee of $1,200 per lot as lots were developed and sold, $200 of which was deferred until all public improvements had been dedicated and any bonds related to the property had been released. In addition, The Michael Companies, Inc. earned a sales commission of 4%, the Banks share being 3%, of the sales price of each lot at settlement. In 2003, the Bank paid The Michael Companies, Inc. sales commissions of $8,640 and development fees of $7,200, of which $1,200 was deferred. In addition, the final retainer of $52,600, representing the $200 per lot deferred throughout the project, was paid to The Michael Companies, Inc. in 2003, the Banks share of which was $39,450. In 2002, the Bank paid The Michael Companies, Inc. sales commissions of $47,505 and development fees of $37,800, of which $6,300 was deferred.
The Michael Companies, Inc. acted as agent in the sale of a property in 2003 previously acquired through foreclosure that was fully charged-off in earlier years. For these services, The Michael Companies, Inc. earned a 10% sales commission of $3,590.
Pursuant to a services agreement between the Company and Winfield M. Kelly, Jr., effective March 8, 2000, as amended April 1, 2002 and January 26, 2004 (the Agreement), Mr. Kelly, Jr. served as the Chairman of the Company and the Bank until the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Subsequent to such Annual Meeting, Mr. Kelly has served as Vice-Chairman of the Board of the Company and the Bank. Pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. Kelly received compensation of $33,333 for his services until August 2004, after which time he received per meeting fees as specified for all directors. Pursuant to the Agreement, upon the earlier of (i) notification by Mr. Kelly, (ii) March 8, 2005 or (iii) an event resulting in a change in controlling interest of the Company or the Bank, the Company would pay Mr. Kelly the sum of $200,000. This amount became payable to him upon the merger with Suburban Bancshares, Inc. (Suburban) as a result of the change-in-control agreement between Mr. Kelly and Suburban. The Company paid Mr. Kelly the $200,000 in May 2004.
In August 1999, the Bank entered into an agreement with an automobile dealership owned principally by Mr. Kelly. Under terms of the agreement, the Bank purchases qualifying automobile loans originated by the dealership. The dealership receives a customary dealer reserve (premium) and reimburses the Bank as a result of loans that pay prior to their scheduled maturity. The dealership reimbursed the Bank $8,000 in 2004, $10,000 in 2003 and $18,000 in 2002 for such prepaid loans. In addition, the Bank purchased two automobiles totaling $27,900 from the dealership during 2002.
The Bank engaged the law firm of Shulman, Rogers, Gandal, Pordy & Ecker, P.A., of which Mr. Shulman, a director of the Company, is a partner, and paid the firm $4,000 in 2004 and $46,000 in 2003 to perform various legal services in the normal course of business. The Bank also engaged the services of Knight, Manzi, Nussbaum & LaPlaca, P.A., of which Mr. LaPlaca, a director of the Company, is a partner, to perform routine legal services, for which the Bank paid the firm $2,600 in 2004 and $1,100 in 2003.
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 6: OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
Net income (expense) on other real estate owned is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Net gain on sales |
$ | 73 | $ | 44 | $ | 155 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
(14 | ) | (22 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||
Provision for losses |
| | (20 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 59 | $ | 22 | $ | 110 | ||||||
No interest related to other real estate owned was capitalized in 2004, 2003 or 2002.
NOTE 7: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 | ||||
Land |
$ | 1,356 | $ | 1,356 | ||
Buildings and leasehold improvements |
6,465 | 6,498 | ||||
Furniture and equipment |
8,549 | 8,925 | ||||
Software |
1,478 | 1,642 | ||||
Automobiles |
92 | 80 | ||||
17,940 | 18,501 | |||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
11,293 | 11,169 | ||||
$ | 6,647 | $ | 7,332 | |||
Depreciation expense for property and equipment was $1.69 million, $1.62 million and $1.73 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company sold its administrative office building and leased it back from the purchaser on terms that meet the criteria for a normal leaseback. The Company recognized a gain of $720,000 on this transaction.
NOTE 8: PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER ASSETS
Prepaid expenses and other assets consisted of the following at December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 | ||||
Accrued interest receivable |
$ | 5,013 | $ | 4,152 | ||
Net deferred tax asset |
5,663 | 5,685 | ||||
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
7,037 | 6,779 | ||||
Other |
3,087 | 1,335 | ||||
$ | 20,800 | $ | 17,951 | |||
At December 31, 2004, other assets included an investment in Delmarva Bank Data Processing Center, Inc. (Delmarva) of $847,000. In April of 2004, the Bank acquired approximately a 20% ownership interest in the common stock of Delmarva, a data processing company headquartered in Denton, Maryland. In February of 2004, the Bank entered into an agreement to retain Delmarva as its primary data processing provider for an initial term of five years. The Companys investment in Delmarva is accounted for under the equity method. The carrying value of the Companys investment in Delmarva is adjusted for the Companys share of Delmarvas net income and is reduced by dividends, if any, that are received from Delmarva. Delmarva was principally formed to provide core data processing services to financial institutions and is not a publicly traded company. Earnings derived from the Companys investment in Delmarva were considered to be immaterial to the Companys overall statements of income, condition and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2004.
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 9: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Company occupies office space under long-term noncancellable operating lease agreements. The leases expire at various dates through 2019 and provide for renewal options ranging from one to five years. In the normal course of business, it is expected that these leases will be renewed or replaced by leases on other properties. A summary of the noncancellable payments due under these leases is as follows at December 31, 2004 (in thousands).
2005 |
$ | 2,219 | |
2006 |
1,835 | ||
2007 |
1,485 | ||
2008 |
1,107 | ||
2009 |
818 | ||
After 2009 |
4,353 | ||
$ | 11,817 | ||
The lease amounts represent minimum rentals, excluding property taxes, operating expenses or percentage rent which the Company may be obligated to pay. Rental expense was $2.5 million in 2004, $2.4 million in 2003, and $2.1 million in 2002.
The Company utilizes a third party servicer to provide data processing services under terms of an agreement that expires in September 2009, with subsequent five-year renewal periods. Data processing costs are based upon the Banks asset size and currently approximate $100,000 monthly.
The Company may be party to legal actions that are routine and incidental to its business. In managements opinion, the outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on the financial statements of the Company.
NOTE 10: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK AND CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, available credit lines and standby letters of credit.
Credit risk is the possibility of sustaining a loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The Companys exposure to credit risk is represented by the contractual amounts of those financial instruments. The Company applies the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. A summary of the financial instruments with off-balance-sheet credit risk is as follows at December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 | ||||
Commitments to extend credit and available credit lines: |
||||||
Commercial |
$ | 113,489 | $ | 117,949 | ||
Real estate development and construction |
271,799 | 254,601 | ||||
Real estate residential mortgage |
4,311 | 4,805 | ||||
Consumer, principally home equity lines of credit |
136,178 | 114,347 | ||||
525,777 | 491,702 | |||||
Standby letters of credit |
25,517 | 23,987 | ||||
Other |
617 | 1,270 | ||||
$ | 551,911 | $ | 516,959 | |||
The Company evaluates the creditworthiness of each customer on an individual basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, upon the extension of credit is based on managements evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral obtained varies but may include: accounts receivable; inventory; property, plant and equipment; deposits held in financial institutions, including the Bank; other marketable securities; residential real estate; and, income-producing commercial properties.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to extend credit to a customer so long as there is no violation of material contractual conditions. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Historically, many of the commercial and consumer commitments expire without being fully drawn; therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Most of the loans resulting from these commitments are variable rate loans.
Available credit lines represent the unused portion of lines of credit previously extended and available to the customer so long as there is no violation of any contractual condition. Credit lines generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. The
61
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
unused portion of real estate development and construction credit lines represent advances to be made based on established draw schedules. Due to the short-term nature and rapid turnover of the real estate development and construction portfolio, cash requirements are generally satisfied by principal repayments from sales of other properties being financed. In addition, many of the commercial and retail credit lines are expected to expire without being fully drawn; therefore, the available amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Available commercial credit lines generally do not extend for more than 12 months. Available development and construction credit lines generally do not extend for more than 36 months. Home equity credit lines generally extend for a period of 15 years and are reviewed annually. At December 31, 2004, over 75% of loans related to commercial, development and construction, and home equity lines of credit carried variable rates of interest.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. It is not likely that the letters of credit will be called because they principally guarantee the completion of development and construction work to be funded, subsequent to inspection, by scheduled loan advances issued by the Company on related loans. Of the total $25.5 million standby letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2004, $11.1 million represented letters of credit secured by cash balances held by the Bank.
Other financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk at December 31, 2004 include $617,000 in Bank guarantees on international letters of credit with a term of less than one year. These letters of credit are issued by a correspondent bank to the Banks customers and are guaranteed by the Bank. The credit risk involved in providing the Banks guarantee and the underwriting process is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Banks credit exposure is secured by a lien on assets pledged by the customer as collateral.
Concentrations of credit risk exist with two groups of borrowers: those whose principal occupation is land development and/or construction, including general contractors and specialty trade contractors, and those who are in the business of managing, renting, leasing or otherwise allowing the use of their real estate by others. Management believes that its underwriting practices, specifically collateral requirements, mitigate the Companys exposure. The following table represents the Companys credit concentration to borrowers involved in land development and/or construction or in real estate management, rental or leasing as of December 31, 2004.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL | |||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
LAND DEVELOPMENT/ CONSTRUCTION |
REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT |
TOTAL CONCENTRATION | ||||||
Loans receivable |
$ | 247,305 | $ | 131,082 | $ | 378,387 | |||
Unused credit lines |
232,456 | 5,196 | 237,652 | ||||||
Letters of credit |
15,986 | 100 | 16,086 | ||||||
$ | 495,747 | $ | 136,378 | $ | 632,125 | ||||
NOTE 11: EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Profit Sharing Plan
Retirement benefits are provided to employees meeting certain age and service eligibility requirements through a profit sharing plan with a cash or deferral arrangement qualifying under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Matching contributions made to the plan by the Company totaled $502,000 in 2004, $475,000 in 2003 and $402,000 in 2002.
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Company has a nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement for selected senior officers. Amounts paid under this plan will be partially or fully recovered through single premium life insurance policies purchased on the lives of the participants. The Companys matching contribution to participant accounts totaled $81,700 in 2004, $65,500 in 2003 and $58,000 in 2002. Under terms of this plan, amounts deferred by the participant and contributed by the Company in the form of a matching contribution accrue earnings based on the prime rate of interest and/or the performance of Columbia Bancorp common stock, as directed by the participant. Net earnings credited to participants totaled approximately $219,000 in 2004, $623,000 in 2003 and $302,000 in 2002.
Stock Option Plans
The Company has stock option award arrangements that provide for the granting of options to acquire common stock to directors and key employees. Option prices are equal to or greater than the market price of the common stock at the date of the grant. Employee options are not exercisable prior to one year from the date of grant. Thereafter, employee options are generally exercisable to the extent of 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% after one, two, three and four years, respectively, from the date of grant. Director options may be exercised at any time after the date of grant. Options expire ten years after the date of grant.
62
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Information with respect to stock options is as follows for the years ended December 31:
2004 |
2003 |
2002 | ||||||||||||||||
SHARES |
WEIGHTED PRICE |
SHARES |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE |
SHARES |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
559,592 | $ | 16.64 | 578,871 | $ | 14.75 | 503,633 | $ | 13.70 | |||||||||
Exercised |
(36,931 | ) | 14.19 | (61,275 | ) | 7.30 | (14,369 | ) | 5.38 | |||||||||
Granted |
87,690 | 32.31 | 68,930 | 26.06 | 99,585 | 18.79 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(3,616 | ) | 23.66 | (26,934 | ) | 21.36 | (9,978 | ) | 15.44 | |||||||||
Outstanding at end of year |
606,735 | $ | 19.01 | 559,592 | $ | 16.64 | 578,871 | $ | 14.75 | |||||||||
A summary of information about stock options outstanding is as follows at December 31, 2004:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING |
SHARES UNDERLYING OPTIONS | |||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE |
SHARES |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE REMAINING LIFE (YEARS) |
||||
$ 10.63 |
10,000 | 5.1 | 10,000 | |||
10.94 |
29,200 | 5.1 | 29,200 | |||
11.00 |
6,000 | 2.1 | 6,000 | |||
11.03 |
10,890 | 6.0 | 10,890 | |||
11.09 |
954 | 4.1 | 954 | |||
11.23 |
1,564 | 2.1 | 1,564 | |||
11.31 |
11,586 | 5.0 | 11,586 | |||
12.00 |
54,200 | 6.1 | 39,571 | |||
12.50 |
12,500 | 6.1 | 9,375 | |||
15.50 |
44,231 | 3.1 | 44,231 | |||
16.00 |
43,350 | 4.1 | 43,350 | |||
16.40 |
19,355 | 7.0 | 19,355 | |||
16.88 |
98,900 | 3.1 | 98,900 | |||
17.00 |
18,950 | 3.8 | 18,950 | |||
18.00 |
57,275 | 7.1 | 28,000 | |||
18.05 |
15,000 | 7.1 | 7,500 | |||
22.03 |
19,285 | 8.0 | 19,285 | |||
22.30 |
40,675 | 8.1 | 12,870 | |||
31.50 |
46,800 | 9.1 | | |||
31.95 |
26,480 | 9.0 | 26,480 | |||
32.25 |
15,500 | 9.1 | | |||
34.19 |
24,040 | 10.0 | 24,040 | |||
$ 19.01 |
606,735 | 5.9 | 462,101 | |||
At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, options to purchase 462,101, 412,515 and 408,259 shares of the Companys common stock, respectively, were exercisable at weighted average prices of $17.46, $16.41 and $14.71, respectively.
63
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 12: INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes was composed of the following for the years ended December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 6,626 | $ | 6,409 | $ | 5,595 | ||||||
State |
1,245 | 1,104 | 695 | |||||||||
7,871 | 7,513 | 6,290 | ||||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
(450 | ) | (747 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||||
State |
(98 | ) | (180 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||
(548 | ) | (927 | ) | (130 | ) | |||||||
$ | 7,323 | $ | 6,586 | $ | 6,160 | |||||||
The types of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the net deferred tax asset were as follows at December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Allowance for credit losses |
$ | 4,534 | $ | 4,277 | ||||
Deferred compensation |
1,057 | 986 | ||||||
Deposits |
56 | 67 | ||||||
Other |
180 | 485 | ||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
5,827 | 5,815 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Investment in limited partnership |
38 | 38 | ||||||
Other |
48 | 47 | ||||||
Total deferred tax liability |
86 | 85 | ||||||
Net deferred tax asset attributable to operations |
5,741 | 5,730 | ||||||
Unrealized loss on investments charged to other comprehensive income |
(78 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax asset (included in prepaid expenses and other assets) |
$ | 5,663 | $ | 5,685 | ||||
The net operating loss carried forward from December 31, 2002 for federal income tax purposes aggregated approximately $430,000 and was fully utilized in 2003. The net operating loss was realized as a result of the acquisition of Suburban Bancshares, Inc. in March 2000.
A reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the amount computed by multiplying income before income taxes by the federal income tax rate of 35% is as follows for the years ended December 31:
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMOUNT |
RATE |
AMOUNT |
RATE |
AMOUNT |
RATE |
|||||||||||||||
Tax at federal statutory rate |
$ | 7,213 | 35.0 | % | $ | 6,472 | 35.0 | % | $ | 5,961 | 35.0 | % | |||||||||
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit |
745 | 3.6 | 601 | 3.2 | 437 | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||
Tax effect of tax exempt loans and securities |
(444 | ) | (2.2 | ) | (336 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (167 | ) | (1.0 | ) | |||||||||
Other |
(191 | ) | (0.9 | ) | (151 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (71 | ) | (0.4 | ) | |||||||||
$ | 7,323 | 35.5 | % | $ | 6,586 | 35.6 | % | $ | 6,160 | 36.2 | % | ||||||||||
64
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 13: DEPOSITS
At December 31, 2004, the scheduled maturity of time deposits was as follows:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
|||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 232,294 | |
Due after one year through two years |
106,589 | ||
Due after two through three years |
15,107 | ||
Due after three through four years |
9,015 | ||
Due after four through five years |
4,567 | ||
$ | 367,572 | ||
NOTE 14: SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
Short-term borrowings consist of short-term promissory notes issued to certain qualified investors, securities sold under repurchase agreements, federal funds purchased and borrowings from the FHLB. The short-term promissory notes are in the form of commercial paper sold to the Banks customers, reprice daily and have maturities of 270 days or less. Securities sold under repurchase agreements are securities sold to the Banks customers under a continuing roll-over contract and mature in one business day. The underlying securities sold are federal agency securities that are segregated in the Banks Federal Reserve Bank account from the Companys other investment securities. Short-term borrowings from the FHLB outstanding during 2004, 2003 and 2002 repriced daily, had maturities of one year or less and could have been prepaid without penalty. Federal funds purchased are unsecured, overnight borrowings from other financial institutions.
Information with respect to short-term borrowings is as follows at and for the years ended December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Amount outstanding at year-end: |
||||||||||||
Short-term promissory notes |
$ | 85,525 | $ | 69,646 | $ | 80,843 | ||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
27,300 | 30,676 | 54,470 | |||||||||
Borrowings from FHLB |
19,500 | 25,600 | | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
3,500 | 2,922 | 12,590 | |||||||||
Weighted average interest rate at year-end: |
||||||||||||
Short-term promissory notes |
1.98 | % | 0.64 | % | 1.00 | % | ||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
1.60 | 0.45 | 0.58 | |||||||||
Borrowings from FHLB |
2.44 | 1.15 | | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
2.23 | 0.64 | 0.94 | |||||||||
Maximum outstanding at any month-end: |
||||||||||||
Short-term promissory notes |
$ | 101,627 | $ | 98,024 | $ | 111,204 | ||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
47,692 | 55,737 | 42,764 | |||||||||
Borrowings from FHLB |
50,600 | 25,600 | 29,400 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
7,953 | 16,229 | 12,590 | |||||||||
Average outstanding: |
||||||||||||
Short-term promissory notes |
79,588 | 76,005 | 72,303 | |||||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
26,445 | 31,394 | 30,219 | |||||||||
Borrowings from FHLB |
12,818 | 6,895 | 15,723 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
4,180 | 11,447 | 8,048 | |||||||||
Weighted average interest rate during the year: |
||||||||||||
Short-term promissory notes |
1.16 | % | 0.71 | % | 1.61 | % | ||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
0.83 | 0.44 | 0.89 | |||||||||
Borrowings from FHLB |
1.60 | 1.17 | 1.97 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
1.21 | 0.78 | 1.81 |
65
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 15: LONG-TERM BORROWINGS
At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company had three long-term advances from the FHLB totaling $20.0 million, with fixed rates of interest ranging from 4.64% to 5.51%. The advances are scheduled to mature in 2008.
On June 24, 2004, a trust formed by the Company issued $6 million of trust preferred securities at an initial variable interest rate of 4.21%, which will reset quarterly. These long-term borrowings, which bear a maturity date of June 25, 2034, may be redeemed at any time after June 24, 2009, and require quarterly distributions by the trust to the holder of the trust preferred securities. The notes are subordinated to the prior payment of any other indebtedness of the Company that, by its terms, is not similarly subordinated. The trust preferred securities qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to regulatory guidelines that limit the amount included to an aggregate of 25% of Tier 1 capital.
On December 30, 2004, a trust formed by the Company issued an additional $4 million in trust preferred securities at an initial variable interest rate of 4.45%, which will reset quarterly. These long-term borrowings bear a maturity date of December 15, 2034, and may be redeemed at any time after December 15, 2009. The trust preferred securities require quarterly distributions by the trust to the holder of the trust preferred securities. The notes are subordinated to the prior payment of any other indebtedness of the Company that, by its terms, is not similarly subordinated. The trust preferred securities qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to regulatory guidelines that limit the amount included to an aggregate of 25% of Tier 1 capital.
NOTE 16: NET OCCUPANCY EXPENSE
Net occupancy expense is comprised of the following for the years ended December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
||||||||
Occupancy expense |
$ | 3,950 | $ | 3,855 | $ | 3,627 | |||||
Rental income |
| (37 | ) | (287 | ) | ||||||
Net occupancy expense |
$ | 3,950 | $ | 3,818 | $ | 3,340 | |||||
NOTE 17: REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Companys financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting procedures. The Banks capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2004, that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. As of December 31, 2004, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes would change the Banks category.
66
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Regulatory capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Bank are as follows:
ACTUAL |
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY PURPOSES |
TO BE WELL CAPITALIZED UNDER PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION PROVISION |
||||||||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
AMOUNT |
RATIO |
AMOUNT |
RATIO |
AMOUNT |
RATIO |
||||||||||||
December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 113,894 | 10.9 | % | $ | 83,944 | 8.0 | % | $ | 104,930 | 10.0 | % | ||||||
The Columbia Bank |
112,211 | 10.7 | 83,794 | 8.0 | 104,742 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
102,229 | 9.7 | 41,972 | 4.0 | 62,958 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
The Columbia Bank |
100,546 | 9.6 | 41,897 | 4.0 | 62,845 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to average assets): |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
102,229 | 8.8 | 46,701 | 4.0 | 58,377 | 5.0 | ||||||||||||
The Columbia Bank |
100,546 | 8.6 | 46,525 | 4.0 | 58,157 | 5.0 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 96,264 | 10.5 | % | $ | 73,682 | 8.0 | % | $ | 92,103 | 10.0 | % | ||||||
The Columbia Bank |
94,074 | 10.2 | 73,537 | 8.0 | 91,921 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets): |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
85,436 | 9.3 | 36,841 | 4.0 | 55,262 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
The Columbia Bank |
83,246 | 9.1 | 36,768 | 4.0 | 55,153 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital (to average assets): |
||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated |
85,436 | 8.4 | 40,530 | 4.0 | 50,663 | 5.0 | ||||||||||||
The Columbia Bank |
83,246 | 8.2 | 40,463 | 4.0 | 50,579 | 5.0 |
NOTE 18: DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument.
Cash and due from banks
The carrying amount of cash and due from banks is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks
The carrying amount of federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale
The fair values of securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale are based upon quoted market prices or dealer quotes.
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market, which may be indicated by the committed sales price. Due to the short holding period of these loans, generally 14 to 30 days, the carrying amount of residential mortgage loans originated for sale is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Loans receivable
The fair value of loans receivable is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates for which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit histories.
Deposit liabilities
The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
67
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Short-term borrowings
The carrying amount of short-term borrowings is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Subordinated debentures
The fair value of subordinated debentures is estimated by discounting the value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Long-term borrowings
The fair value of long-term FHLB advances is estimated by discounting the value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for advances with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and financial guarantees written
The Company charges fees for commitments to extend credit. Interest rates on loans for which these commitments are extended are normally committed for periods of less than one month. Fees charged on standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees are deemed to be immaterial and these guarantees are expected to be settled at face amount or expire unused. It is impractical to assign any fair value to these commitments.
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments are as follows at December 31:
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
CARRYING AMOUNT |
FAIR VALUE |
CARRYING AMOUNT |
FAIR VALUE | ||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 30,012 | $ | 30,012 | $ | 35,846 | $ | 35,846 | ||||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks |
10,112 | 10,112 | 3,497 | 3,497 | ||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale |
164,150 | 163,944 | 133,927 | 134,611 | ||||||||
Residential mortgage loans originated for sale |
8,698 | 8,698 | 6,046 | 6,046 | ||||||||
Loans receivable, net of unearned income |
950,170 | 966,077 | 835,484 | 842,971 | ||||||||
Less allowance for credit losses |
11,583 | 10,828 | ||||||||||
Loans, net |
938,587 | 824,656 | ||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
912,578 | 912,627 | 787,608 | 790,893 | ||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
135,825 | 135,825 | 128,844 | 128,844 | ||||||||
Subordinated debentures |
10,310 | 10,371 | | | ||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
20,000 | 21,110 | 20,000 | 21,691 |
68
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 19: FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF PARENT COMPANY
The following is financial information of Columbia Bancorp (parent company only) at and for the years ended December 31:
Statements of Condition
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 | ||||
Assets: |
||||||
Cash and temporary investments |
$ | 86,118 | $ | 69,949 | ||
Investment in The Columbia Bank |
100,486 | 83,259 | ||||
Investment in statutory trusts |
310 | | ||||
Securities available-for-sale |
1,414 | 1,091 | ||||
Other assets |
2,142 | 1,443 | ||||
$ | 190,470 | $ | 155,742 | |||
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
||||||
Short-term borrowings |
$ | 85,792 | $ | 69,767 | ||
Subordinated debentures |
10,310 | | ||||
Other liabilities |
2,020 | 526 | ||||
Stockholders equity |
92,348 | 85,449 | ||||
$ | 190,470 | $ | 155,742 | |||
Statements of Income
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 | ||||||
Income: |
|||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 944 | $ | 591 | $ | 1,352 | |||
Dividend income from subsidiary |
5,970 | 4,855 | 3,231 | ||||||
Income from statutory trusts |
4 | | | ||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities |
| 28 | | ||||||
Management fees from subsidiary |
159 | 139 | 108 | ||||||
7,077 | 5,613 | 4,691 | |||||||
Expenses: |
|||||||||
Interest expense on short-term borrowings |
937 | 551 | 1,281 | ||||||
Interest expense related to statutory trusts |
146 | | | ||||||
Director fees |
143 | 144 | 120 | ||||||
Professional fees |
441 | 329 | 128 | ||||||
Other expenses |
190 | 157 | 128 | ||||||
1,857 | 1,181 | 1,657 | |||||||
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed net income of The Columbia Bank |
5,220 | 4,432 | 3,034 | ||||||
Income tax benefit |
264 | 148 | 69 | ||||||
Income before equity in undistributed net income of The Columbia Bank |
5,484 | 4,580 | 3,103 | ||||||
Equity in undistributed net income of The Columbia Bank |
7,801 | 7,324 | 7,768 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 13,285 | $ | 11,904 | $ | 10,871 | |||
69
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Statements of Cash Flows
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Income before equity in undistributed net income of The Columbia Bank |
$ | 5,484 | $ | 4,580 | $ | 3,103 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net accretion |
| (2 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities |
| (28 | ) | | ||||||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
1,361 | (176 | ) | 1,313 | ||||||||
Decrease in other liabilities |
(826 | ) | (175 | ) | (298 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
6,019 | 4,199 | 4,117 | |||||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchase of securities available-for-sale |
| (303 | ) | | ||||||||
Maturities of securities available-for-sale |
| 250 | | |||||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale |
| 777 | | |||||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
| 724 | | |||||||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
16,025 | (11,141 | ) | 9,975 | ||||||||
Issuance of subordinated debentures |
10,000 | | | |||||||||
Investment in The Columbia Bank |
(9,434 | ) | (1,750 | ) | (2,100 | ) | ||||||
Cash dividends distributed on common stock |
(4,293 | ) | (3,564 | ) | (3,124 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of common stock |
(2,672 | ) | | (158 | ) | |||||||
Net proceeds from stock options exercised |
524 | 448 | 77 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
10,150 | (16,007 | ) | 4,670 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and temporary investments |
16,169 | (11,084 | ) | 8,787 | ||||||||
Cash and temporary investments at beginning of year |
69,949 | 81,033 | 72,246 | |||||||||
Cash and temporary investments at end of year |
$ | 86,118 | $ | 69,949 | $ | 81,033 | ||||||
70
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
A summary of selected quarterly financial data is as follows for the years ended December 31:
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) |
FIRST QUARTER |
SECOND QUARTER |
THIRD QUARTER |
FOURTH QUARTER | ||||||||
(UNAUDITED) | ||||||||||||
2004: |
||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 13,255 | $ | 13,408 | $ | 14,833 | $ | 16,050 | ||||
Net interest income |
10,675 | 10,653 | 11,702 | 12,553 | ||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
310 | 190 | 192 | 36 | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
4,573 | 4,831 | 5,555 | 5,649 | ||||||||
Net income |
2,981 | 3,113 | 3,518 | 3,673 | ||||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.52 | ||||
Diluted |
0.40 | 0.42 | 0.48 | 0.50 | ||||||||
2003: |
||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 12,373 | $ | 12,828 | $ | 13,051 | $ | 13,151 | ||||
Net interest income |
9,461 | 10,070 | 10,492 | 10,644 | ||||||||
Provision for credit losses |
305 | 745 | | 120 | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
3,891 | 4,434 | 5,380 | 4,785 | ||||||||
Net income |
2,491 | 2,837 | 3,443 | 3,133 | ||||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.44 | ||||
Diluted |
0.34 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.42 |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There have been no changes in or disagreements with accountants, on accounting and financial disclosure, during 2004 or 2003.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Companys principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures by the Companys management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as of December 31, 2004. There were no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
71
REPORT OF MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
To our Stockholders,
We, together with the other members of Columbia Bancorp management, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Companys financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is the process designed under our supervision, and effected by the Companys Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Companys financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility that misstatements may not be prevented or detected. Accordingly, even effective internal controls over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Furthermore, the effectiveness of internal controls can change with circumstances.
Management has evaluated the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 in relation to criteria described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on managements evaluation, the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Companys financial statements included in this annual report and has expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. KPMG LLP has also expressed an unqualified opinion on Managements assessment of, and the effective operation of, our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. KPMG LLP reports follow our financial statements.
/s/ John M. Bond, Jr. | /s/ John A. Scaldara, Jr. | /s/ James P. Radick | ||||||
John M. Bond, Jr. | John A. Scaldara, Jr. | James P. Radick | ||||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | President, Chief Operating Officer | Chief Financial Officer |
72
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Columbia Bancorp:
We have audited managements assessment, included in their accompanying report on internal control over financial reporting, that Columbia Bancorp maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management of Columbia Bancorp is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting of Columbia Bancorp based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Columbia Bancorp maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the COSO. Also, in our opinion, Columbia Bancorp maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of condition of Columbia Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and our report dated March 11, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP |
Baltimore, Maryland |
March 11, 2005 |
[None]
73
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information with respect to Directors of the Company, beneficial ownership reporting compliance the Companys Audit Committee, and procedures for stockholder communications to the Board is incorporated by reference to the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals that applies to the principal executive officers of the Company and its reporting subsidiaries, and all professionals servicing in finance, accounting, treasury, tax or investor relations roles. To access the Code at our website, www.thecolumbiabank.com, click on Investor RelationsCorporate Governance.
The following information is supplied with respect to executive officers of the Company and the Bank. Each such officer serves at the pleasure of the Board and is appointed annually. Age is that as of March 14, 2005. To our knowledge, the only family relationships among any directors or executive officers of the Company are James R. Moxley, Jr., who is the father of James R. Moxley, III, both of whom serve as directors of the Company and the Bank.
Name |
Age |
Position with the Company and the Bank | ||
John M. Bond, Jr. |
61 | Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank | ||
John A. Scaldara, Jr. |
41 | Director, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company and the Bank | ||
Michael T. Galeone |
56 | Executive Vice President of the Bank | ||
Stephen A. Horvath |
55 | Executive Vice President of the Bank | ||
Brian K. Israel |
39 | Executive Vice President of the Bank | ||
Adelbert D. Karfonta |
59 | Executive Vice President of the Bank | ||
Robert W. Locke |
59 | Executive Vice President of the Bank | ||
Scott C. Nicholson |
43 | Executive Vice President of the Bank | ||
Melissa A. Quirk |
46 | Executive Vice President of the Bank | ||
James P. Radick |
42 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank |
Mr. Bond has served as a director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank since inception, and was elected Chairman of the Board in May 2004. He was one of two individuals who started Columbia Bancorp in 1987. He previously held Senior Vice President positions with Chase Bank of Maryland, a regional affiliate of Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., and The First National Bank of Maryland (M&T). Prior to returning to Maryland in 1978, Mr. Bond was a Vice President with Citibank, N.A. in New York and a consultant with McKinsey & Company. He is a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard College and earned MBA and JD degrees from Columbia University. Mr. Bond has been an active volunteer in his community and currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Goucher College. He was recently elected to serve as a Director of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. He is a recent past Chairman of the Maryland Bankers Association and currently is a member of the Government Relations Council of the American Bankers Association. In 1997, Mr. Bond received the Entrepreneur of the Year Award for Financial Services in Maryland sponsored by Ernst & Young, LLP, the Kauffman Foundation, USA Today and Nasdaq.
74
Mr. Scaldara is President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company and the Bank, and was elected a Director in January 2004. Mr. Scaldara joined the Company in March 1989. Prior to joining the Company, he held various staff accounting and consulting positions with KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP in Baltimore. Mr. Scaldara is a graduate of Loyola College, Baltimore (B.A.). He is a certified public accountant and a member of the Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Scaldara is an active volunteer in his community and currently serves on the Government Relations Council of the Maryland Bankers Association and the Taxation Committee of the American Bankers Association. He is a member of the Board of Sponsors of the Sellinger School of Business and Management of Loyola College in Maryland. Mr. Scaldara is also a Director Emeritus of the Howard Hospital Foundation.
Mr. Galeone directs the retail lending, compliance and marketing areas of the Bank. He has in excess of 32 years of experience in the consumer finance industry with the Bank and Household International Corporation. Mr. Galeone joined the Company in February 1988 and was elected Executive Vice President in March 1992. He is actively involved in civic and professional affairs. Mr. Galeone is a past Chairman of the Board of the Howard County Chamber of Commerce, a member of the Board of Directors of the Maryland Chamber of Commerce, a member of the Howard County Spending Affordability Committee and the Treasurer and a member of the Board for the Economic Development Authority for Howard County, as well as several other organizations involved in education and community welfare. Mr. Galeone attended Temple University Institute of Technology.
Mr. Horvath directs the commercial banking activity in the Washington Suburban Region of the Bank. He has been an Executive Vice President with the Company since the merger with Suburban in March 2000. Prior to the merger, Mr. Horvath served as Director, President and Chief Operating Officer of Suburban and President and Chief Executive Officer of Suburban Bank from January 1997 to March 2000. In his 33-year banking career, he has also held positions with Crestar, First Union National Bank, and National City Bank. Mr. Horvath is active in civic affairs. Currently he is a member of the County Executives Advisory Council of Montgomery County and the Finance Committee of the Prince Georges Chamber of Commerce. At the request of the Prince Georges County Executive, Mr. Horvath chairs the Financial Tools Subcommittee, assisting in the creation of the new Prince Georges County Economic Development Plan. Previously he served as Chairman of the Business Loan Fund of Montgomery County, Chairman of the Prince Georges United Way Campaign and a member of the Board of Directors of the Prince Georges Chamber of Commerce. He is a graduate of Denison University (B.A.), Baldwin-Wallace College (M.B.A.), and the Stonier Graduate School of Banking and Leadership Maryland.
Mr. Israel, with 18 years of corporate finance experience, directs the commercial banking activity in the Howard, Anne Arundel, and Baltimore regions of the Bank. He has been with the Company since October 1997 and was elected Executive Vice President in February 2003. Mr. Israel is active in the community with current Board positions with Leadership Howard County and the Jim Rouse Entrepreneurial Fund. Mr. Israel also teaches part-time for the MBA program at Loyola College. A CPA, Mr. Israel earned a BA from the University of Maryland and an MBA from Loyola College.
Mr. Karfonta directs the retail branch network and investment services of the Bank. He has over 28 years of experience in the financial services industry. He held several executive positions with Household International Corporation in both the banking division and the finance division. Mr. Karfonta joined the Company in July 1995 and was elected Executive Vice President in February 2001. He is actively involved in both the Baltimore and Howard County communities, serving as a Director and Vice Chair for the Howard County Tourism Council, Director and Vice Chair of the Roland Park Retirement Community and Chairman of the Howard County Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Karfonta sits on the Advisory Board for Johns Hopkins Breast Cancer Fundraising, and is a member of the United Way Cabinet. He is also active in various programs supporting youth mentoring and educational partnerships. He is a graduate of the University of Baltimore (B.A.) and attended the Robert G. Merrick School of Business.
Mr. Locke is the senior commercial business development officer in the Howard County and Baltimore regions of the Bank. He has over 28 years of experience in the commercial lending area with the Bank and the former Maryland National Bank and The National Bank of Washington. Mr. Locke has been with the Company since February 1988 and was elected Executive Vice President in January 1999. He is actively involved in civic and professional affairs, serving as past Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Baltimore County Chamber of Commerce. He also serves on the Board of Directors of the Baltimore Chamber Orchestra and the Hunt Valley Business Forum. Mr. Locke is a graduate of Colgate University (B.A.) and City College of New York (M.S.Ed).
Mr. Nicholson directs the acquisition, development and construction loan activities of the Bank. He has 21 years of experience in real estate lending with the Bank, First American Metro Corporation, Equitable Federal Savings Bank, First Texas Savings Association and Lumbermens Investment Corporation. Mr. Nicholson joined the Company in August 1993 and was elected Executive Vice President in November 1999. He is actively involved in civic and professional affairs, serving with various organizations including Director of both Development Guaranty Group of Montgomery County, Inc. and Development Guaranty Group of Southern Maryland, Inc., subsidiaries of Maryland National Capital Building Industry Association, as an Alternate Director of Home Builders Association of Maryland and as a Coach with the Soccer Association of Columbia/Howard County. Mr. Nicholson attended The University of Texas at Austin and St. Edwards University.
Ms. Quirk has been employed by the Bank since its inception and was elected Executive Vice President of Operations, Information Technology, Facilities Management and Security in January 2005. She has more than 25 years of banking experience with the Bank and with St. Landry Bank, a community Bank in Louisiana. Ms. Quirk studied at the AIB Banking School at the University of Southern Louisiana. She has served on the Federal Reserve Fifth District Cash Committee and is a past board member of the Baltimore Chapter of the Bank Administration Institute.
75
Mr. Radick is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and the Bank. He joined the Company in December 2004 and brings more than 20 years of financial management and audit experience in the financial services industry. Mr. Radick has served as the senior financial officer of financial institutions for the past eleven years. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Radick most recently served as the senior financial officer at Sun Bancorp, Inc. and, previously, at NSD Bancorp, Inc. both located in Pennsylvania. None of these entities are affiliated with the Company. Mr. Radick earned his B.A. from Grove City College, Grove City, Pennsylvania. He is a certified bank auditor and chartered bank auditor. He is a former member of the Pennsylvania Bankers Association, Financial Accounting Standards Committee and the former Vice President of Education and Finance of the Bank Administration Institutes Pittsburgh Chapter.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption Executive Compensation and Proposal 1 Election of Directors Compensation of Directors in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the captions Principal Beneficial Owners of the Companys Common Stock and Equity Compensation Plan Information in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the information appearing under the caption Independent Auditors in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
a. | Filed Documents |
1. | Financial Statements |
Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary: |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
Consolidated Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
76
2. | Financial Statement Schedules |
None.
3. | Exhibits |
(3.1) | Form of Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, restated as of December 31, 1995, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(3.1a) | Articles Supplementary dated September 27, 1999, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(3.2) | Amended, Corrected and Restated By-laws of the Company, as of January 26, 2004, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on January 30, 2004 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(4.1) | Indenture trust for Columbia Bancorp Statutory Trust I, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(4.2) | Indenture trust for Columbia Bancorp Statutory Trust II, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on December 29, 2004 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.1) | Form of the Companys 1987 Stock Option Plan, as amended April 17, 1990, December 18, 1995, and February 24, 1997, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.1a) | Amendment dated September 28, 1998 to the Companys 1987 Stock Option Plan, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.2) | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for use under the 1987 Stock Option Plan, as amended, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed August 15, 1996 (Reg. No. 333-10231). | |
(10.3) | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for use under the 1987 Stock Option Plan, as amended, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed August 15, 1996 (Reg. No. 333-10231). | |
(10.4) | Form of the Companys 1990 Director Stock Option Plan, as amended July 29, 1996 and February 24, 1997, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 (File No. 000-24302). |
77
(10.5) | Suburban Bancshares, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed March 21, 2000 (Reg. No. 333-32912). | |
(10.6) | Form of the Companys Incentive Stock Option Agreement for use under the 1997 Suburban Bancshares, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed March 21, 2000 (Reg. No. 333-32912). | |
(10.7) | Form of Employment Agreement dated February 26, 1996 with John M. Bond, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.7a) | Amendment dated December 18, 1997 to the employment agreement dated February 26, 1996 with John M. Bond, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.7b) | Amendment dated April 30, 2002 to the employment agreement dated February 26, 1996, as amended December 18, 1997, with John M. Bond, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.7c) | Amendment dated January 26, 2004 to the employment agreement dated February 26, 1996, as amended December 18, 1997 and April 30, 2002, with John M. Bond, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.8) | Form of Employment Agreement dated February 26, 1996 with Michael T. Galeone, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.8a) | Amendment dated December 16, 1997 to the employment agreement dated February 26, 1996 with Michael T. Galeone, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.9) | Form of Employment Agreement dated February 26, 1996 with John A. Scaldara, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended December 31, 1995 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.9a) | Amendment dated December 16, 1997 to the employment agreement dated February 26, 1996 with John A. Scaldara, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.9b) | Amendment dated January 26, 2004 to the employment agreement dated February 26, 1996, as amended December 16, 1997 and April 30, 2002, with John A. Scaldara, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.10) | Form of Employment Agreement dated February 26, 1999 with Robert W. Locke, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.11) | Deferred Compensation Plan dated September 27, 1996, as amended December 30, 1996, and February 24, 1997, including addenda thereto, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1996 (File No. 000-24302). |
78
(10.11a) | Amendment dated February 25, 2003 to the Deferred Compensation Plan dated September 27, 1996, as amended December 30, 1996 and February 24, 1997, including addenda thereto, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.11b) | Addendum dated February 27, 2003 to the Deferred Compensation Plan dated September 27, 1996, as amended February 25, 2003, December 30, 1996 and February 24, 1997, including addenda thereto, for John M. Bond, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.11c) | Form of addendum dated February 27, 2003 to the Deferred Compensation Plan dated September 27, 1996, as amended February 25, 2003, December 30, 1996 and February 24, 1997, including addenda thereto, for Michael T. Galeone, John A. Scaldara, Jr., Robert W. Locke, Stephen A. Horvath, and Adelbert D. Karfonta, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.13) | Form of the Companys 1997 Stock Option Plan, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed July 29, 1997 (Reg. No. 333-32359). | |
(10.13a) | Amendment dated September 28, 1998 to the Companys 1997 Stock Option Plan, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.13b) | Form of Amended Incentive Stock Option Agreement for use under the Companys 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.13c) | Form of Amended Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for use under the Companys 1997 Stock Option Plan, as amended, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.13d) | Amended and Restated Columbia Bancorp 1997 Stock Option Plan, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by the Company on February 13, 2004 (Reg. No. 333-112803). | |
(10.13e) | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under Amended and Restated Columbia Bancorp 1997 Stock Option Plan, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by the Company on February 13, 2004 (Reg. No. 333-112803). | |
(10.13f) | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under Amended and Restated Columbia Bancorp 1997 Stock Option Plan, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed by the Company on February 13, 2004 (Reg. No. 333-112803). | |
(10.14) | Form of Board Chairmans Services Agreement with Winfield M. Kelly, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by the Company on December 1, 1999 (Reg. No. 333-91887). |
79
(10.14a) | Amendment dated April 1, 2002 to the Board Chairmans Services Agreement with Winfield M. Kelly, Jr., previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.14b) | Amendment dated January 26, 2004 to the Board Chairman Services Agreement with Winfield M. Kelly, Jr., dated February 9, 2000, as amended April 1, 2002, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.15) | Form of Employment Agreement with Stephen A. Horvath dated September 28, 1999, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed December 1, 1999 (Reg. No. 333-91887). | |
(10.16) | Form of Employment Agreement dated November 2, 1999 with Scott C. Nicholson, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.17) | Form of Employment Agreement dated March 23, 2001 with Adelbert D. Karfonta, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.18) | Columbia Bancorp 401(k) Plan and Trust dated January 1, 1989, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on July 29, 1997 (File No 333-32349). | |
(10.18a) | Amendment and Restatement, dated January 1, 1997, to the Columbia Bancorp 401(k) Plan and Trust, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.18b) | Form of Amended and Restated 401(k) Plan and Trust Basic Plan Document #01, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.18c) | Amendment to Amended and Restated 401(k) Plan and Trust Basic Plan Document #01, effective January 1, 2002, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.19) | Form of Amendment dated April 30, 2002 to the employment agreements with Michael T. Galeone, John A. Scaldara, Jr., Robert W. Locke, Stephen A. Horvath, Scott C. Nicholson and Adelbert D. Karfonta, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.19a) | Form of Amendment dated January 26, 2004 to the employment agreements with Michael T. Galeone, Robert W. Locke, Stephen A. Horvath, Scott C. Nicholson and Adelbert D. Karfonta dated February 26, 1996, as amended December, 1997 and April 30, 2002, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.20) | Change of Control Agreement with James P. Radick dated December 13, 2004, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on December 13, 2004 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.21) | Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of June 24, 2004, between Columbia Bancorp, as issuer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company, Americas, as indenture trustee, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by the Company on August 6, 2004 (File No. 000-24302). |
80
(10.22) | Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of December 30, 2004, between Columbia Bancorp, as issuer, and Wilmington Trust Company, as indenture trustee, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on January 3, 2005 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.23) | Guarantee Agreement, dated as of December 30, 2004, between Columbia Bancorp, as guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as guarantee trustee. previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on January 3, 2005 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(10.24) | Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of December 30, 2004, by and among Columbia Bancorp, as sponsor, Wilmington Trust Company, as institutional and Delaware trustee, the administrators named therein and the holders, from time to time, of undivided beneficial interests, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on January 3, 2005 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(14) | Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(14a) | Columbia Bancorp and Subsidiary Code of Conduct and Ethics, previously filed with the Commission as an Exhibit to, and incorporated herein by reference from, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 000-24302). | |
(21.1) | List of Subsidiaries of the Company |
Name |
State of Incorporation |
Owned by |
Percentage Ownership | |||
The Columbia Bank |
Maryland | Columbia Bancorp | 100% | |||
Columbia Bancorp Statutory Trust I |
Delaware | Columbia Bancorp | 100% | |||
Columbia Bancorp Statutory Trust II |
Delaware | Columbia Bancorp | 100% | |||
McAlpine Enterprises, Inc. |
Maryland | The Columbia Bank | 100% | |||
Howard I, LLC |
Maryland | The Columbia Bank | 100% | |||
Howard II, LLC |
Maryland | The Columbia Bank | 100% | |||
Columbia Leasing, Inc. |
Maryland | The Columbia Bank | 100% |
(23.1 | )* | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. | |
(31.1 | )* | Certification by the Principal Executive Officer required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). | |
(31.2 | )* | Certification by the Executive Officer required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). | |
(31.3 | )* | Certification by the Principal Financial Officer required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). | |
(32.1 | )+ | Certification by the Principal Executive Officer. | |
(32.2 | )+ | Certification by the Executive Officer. | |
(32.3 | )+ | Certification by the Principal Financial Officer. |
* | Filed herewith. |
+ | Furnished herewith. |
Note: Exhibits 10.1 through 10.20 relate to management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements.
81
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Columbia Bancorp (Registrant) | ||||||||
March 11, 2005 | By: | /s/ John M. Bond, Jr. | ||||||
John M. Bond, Jr. | ||||||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
/s/ John M. Bond, Jr. John M. Bond, Jr. |
Chairman of the Board Chief Executive Officer |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Winfield M. Kelly, Jr. Winfield M. Kelly, Jr. |
Vice Chairman of the Board |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ James R. Moxley, Jr. James R. Moxley, Jr. |
Vice Chairman of the Board |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Herschel L. Langenthal Herschel L. Langenthal |
Chairman of the Executive Committee |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ John A. Scaldara, Jr. John A. Scaldara, Jr. |
President, Chief Operating Officer |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ James P. Radick James P. Radick |
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) |
3/10/05 |
82
Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
/s/ Anand S. Bhasin Anand S. Bhasin |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Robert R. Bowie, Jr. Robert R. Bowie, Jr. |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Garnett Y. Clark, Jr. Garnett Y. Clark, Jr. |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Hugh F.Z. Cole, Jr. Hugh F.Z. Cole, Jr. |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ William L. Hermann William L. Hermann |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Charles C. Holman Charles C. Holman |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Raymond G. LaPlaca Raymond G. LaPlaca |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Morris A. Little Morris A. Little |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Harry L. Lundy, Jr. Harry L. Lundy, Jr. |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Kenneth H. Michael Kenneth H. Michael |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ James R. Moxley, III James R. Moxley, III |
Director |
3/10/05 |
83
Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
/s/ Vincent D. Palumbo Vincent D. Palumbo |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Mary S. Scrivener Mary S. Scrivener |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Lawrence A. Shulman Lawrence A. Shulman |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Maurice M. Simpkins Maurice M. Simpkins |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Robert N. Smelkinson Robert N. Smelkinson |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ Theodore G. Venetoulis Theodore G. Venetoulis |
Director |
3/10/05 | ||
/s/ James J. Winn. Jr. James J. Winn, Jr. |
Director |
3/10/05 |
84