Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 1-9028

NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (949) 718-4400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NONE

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x    No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Rule 12b-2).    Yes x    No ¨

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $1,247,466,000 as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

66,895,261

(Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 24, 2005)

Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III are incorporated by reference from the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 27, 2005.

Table of Contents

NATIONWIDE HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC.

FORM 10-K

December 31, 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I

Nationwide Health Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation incorporated on October 14, 1985, is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that invests primarily in healthcare related facilities and provides financing to healthcare providers. Whenever we refer herein to “NHP” or to “us” or use the terms “we” or “our,” we are referring to Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

We primarily make our investments by acquiring an ownership interest in facilities and leasing them to unaffiliated operators under “triple-net” “master” leases that pass all facility operating costs (insurance, property taxes, utilities, maintenance, capital improvements, etc.) through to the tenant operator. In addition, but intentionally to a much lesser extent because we view the risks of this activity to be greater, from time to time we extend mortgage loans and other financing to operators. Currently, about 96% of our revenues are derived from our leases, with the remaining 4% from our mortgage loans and other financing.

At December 31, 2004, we had investments in 403 facilities located in 39 states. As of December 31, 2004, we had direct ownership of:

At December 31, 2004, we held 12 mortgage loans secured by:

We also have a 25% interest in an unconsolidated joint venture that owns 47 assisted living facilities located in 12 states.

Substantially all of our owned facilities are leased under “triple-net” leases, which are accounted for as operating leases, to 67 healthcare providers.

Our facilities are operated by 72 different operators, including the following publicly traded companies:

Of the operators of our facilities, only Alterra Healthcare Corporation and American Retirement Corporation accounted for 10% or more of our revenues for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 or are

1

Table of Contents

expected to account for more than 10% of our revenues in 2005. In addition, our joint venture, of which we are the manager, has direct ownership of 47 assisted living facilities, all of which are leased to Alterra.

The following table summarizes our top five operators, the number of facilities each operates and the percentage of our revenues received from each of these operators as of the end of 2004, as adjusted for facilities acquired and disposed during 2004:

Our leases generally have initial terms ranging from five to 21 years with two or more multiple-year renewal options. We earn fixed monthly minimum rents and may earn periodic additional rents. The additional rent payments are generally computed as a percentage of facility revenues in excess of base amounts or as a percentage of the increase in the Consumer Price Index. Additional rents are generally calculated and payable monthly or quarterly. While the calculations and payments of additional rents contingent upon revenue are generally made on a quarterly basis, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB No. 101) does not allow for the recognition of this revenue until all possible contingencies have been eliminated. Most of our leases with additional rents contingent upon revenue are structured as quarterly calculations so that all contingencies for revenue recognition have been eliminated at each of our quarterly reporting dates. Also, the majority of our leases contain provisions that the total rent cannot decrease from one year to the next. Approximately 81% of our facilities are leased under master leases. In addition, the majority of our leases contain cross-collateralization and cross-default provisions tied to other leases with the same tenant, as well as grouped lease renewals and, if purchase options exist, grouped purchase options. Leases covering 287 facilities are backed by security deposits consisting of irrevocable letters of credit or cash, most of which cover from three to six months, of initial monthly minimum rents. Leases covering 153 facilities require the tenant to impound property taxes and leases covering 71 facilities require capital expenditure impounds. Under the terms of the leases, the tenant is responsible for all maintenance, repairs, taxes, insurance and capital expenditures for the leased properties.

During 2004, we acquired 28 assisted and independent living facilities, 13 skilled nursing facilities and five specialty hospitals for an aggregate investment of $381,989,000. We also completed the development of a $13,351,000 independent and assisted living facility, of which $5,764,000 was funded in 2004, and funded $10,634,000 in capital improvements at a number of facilities in accordance with existing lease provisions. These capital improvements generally result in an increase in the minimum rents we earn on these facilities.

At December 31, 2004, we held 12 mortgage loans secured by 13 skilled nursing facilities, one assisted and independent living facility and one continuing care retirement community. These loans had an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $75,602,000, net of an aggregate discount totaling $149,000, for a net book value of $75,453,000 at December 31, 2004. The mortgage loans have individual outstanding balances ranging from $216,000 to $10,796,000 and have maturities ranging from 2005 to 2031.

Taxation

We believe we have operated in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and we intend to continue to operate in such a manner. If we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we will generally not be subject to federal corporate income taxes on our net income that is currently distributed to stockholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the “double

2

Table of Contents

taxation”, e.g. at the corporate and stockholder levels, that usually results from investment in the stock of a corporation. Please see the heading “If we fail to maintain our REIT status, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates” under the caption “Risk Factors” for more information.

Objectives and Policies

We are organized to invest in income-producing healthcare related facilities. At December 31, 2004, we had investments in 356 facilities located in 39 states, and we plan to invest in additional health care properties in the United States. We also have a 25% interest in JER/NHP Senior Housing, LLC, an unconsolidated joint venture with JER Senior Housing, LLC, that owns 47 assisted and independent living facilities located in 12 states. Other than our interest in this joint venture, we do not intend to invest in securities of, or interests in, persons engaged in real estate activities or to invest in securities of other issuers for the purpose of exercising control.

In evaluating potential investments, we consider such factors as:

There are no limitations on the percentage of our total assets that may be invested in any one property. The Investment and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors or the Board of Directors may establish limitations as it deems appropriate from time to time. No limits have been set on the number of properties in which we will seek to invest, or on the concentration of investments in any one facility type or any geographic area. From time to time we may sell properties; however, we do not intend to engage in the purchase and sale, or turnover, of investments. We acquire our investments primarily for long-term income.

At December 31, 2004, we had two series of preferred stock, $187,409,000 in notes and bonds payable and $470,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of debt securities that are senior to our common stock. We may, in the future, issue additional debt or equity securities that will be senior to our common stock. During the past three years we have issued one series of preferred stock senior to our common stock, and while we do not have immediate plans to issue additional equity securities senior to our common stock, we may in the future.

We have authority to offer shares of our capital stock in exchange for investments that conform to our standards and to repurchase or otherwise acquire our shares or other securities.

In certain circumstances, we may make mortgage loans with respect to certain facilities secured by those facilities. At December 31, 2004, we held 12 mortgage loans secured by 13 skilled nursing facilities, one assisted and independent living facilities and one continuing care retirement community. There are no limitations on the number or the amount of mortgages that may be placed on any one piece of property.

We may incur additional indebtedness when, in the opinion of our management and board of directors, it is advisable. For short-term purposes we from time to time negotiate lines of credit or arrange for other short-term

3

Table of Contents

borrowings from banks or otherwise. We arrange for long-term borrowings through public offerings or private placements to institutional investors.

In addition, we may incur additional mortgage indebtedness on real estate which we have acquired through purchase, foreclosure or otherwise. Where leverage is present on terms deemed favorable, we invest in properties subject to existing loans or secured by mortgages, deeds of trust or similar liens on the properties. We also may obtain non-recourse or other mortgage financing on unleveraged properties in which we have invested or may refinance properties acquired on a leveraged basis.

We will not, without the proper approval of a majority of the directors, acquire from or sell to any director, officer or employee of NHP or any affiliate thereof, as the case may be, any of our assets or other property. We provide to our stockholders annual reports containing audited financial statements and quarterly reports containing unaudited information, which are available upon request.

We do not have plans to underwrite securities of other issuers.

The policies set forth herein have been established by our board of directors and may be changed without stockholder approval.

Properties

Of the 403 facilities in which we have investments, we have direct ownership of:

Included in the 403 facilities are 47 assisted living facilities owned by our unconsolidated joint venture. Substantially all of the properties are leased to other parties under terms that require the tenant, in addition to paying rent, to pay all additional charges, taxes, assessments, levies and fees incurred in the operation of the leased properties. No individual property held by us is material to us as a whole.

Skilled Nursing Facilities

Skilled nursing facilities provide rehabilitative, restorative, skilled nursing and medical treatment for patients and residents who do not require the high-technology, care-intensive, high-cost setting of an acute care or rehabilitative hospital. Treatment programs include physical, occupational, speech, respiratory and other therapeutic programs, including sub-acute clinical protocols such as wound care and intravenous drug treatment.

Assisted and Independent Living Facilities

Assisted and independent living facilities offer studio, one bedroom and two bedroom apartments on a month-to-month basis primarily to elderly individuals with various levels of assistance requirements. Assisted and independent living residents are provided meals and eat in a central dining area; assisted living residents may also be assisted with some daily living activities with programs and services that allow residents certain conveniences and make it possible for them to live as independently as possible; staff is also available when residents need assistance and for group activities. Services provided to residents who require more assistance with daily living activities, but who do not require the constant supervision skilled nursing facilities provide, include personal supervision and assistance with eating, bathing, grooming and administering medication. Charges for room, board and services are generally paid from private sources.

4

Table of Contents

Continuing Care Retirement Communities

Continuing care retirement communities provide a broad continuum of care. At the most basic level, independent living residents might receive meal service, maid service or other services as part of their monthly rent. Services which aid in everyday living are provided to other residents, much like in an assisted living facility. At the far end of the spectrum, skilled nursing, rehabilitation and medical treatment are provided to residents who need those services. This type of facility consists of independent living units, dedicated assisted living units and licensed skilled nursing beds on one campus. The different types of services may be provided by different operators.

Specialty Hospitals

Rehabilitation hospitals provide inpatient and outpatient medical care to patients requiring high intensity physical, respiratory, neurological, orthopedic or other treatment protocols and for intermediate periods in their recovery. These programs are often the most effective in treating severe skeletal or neurological injuries and traumatic diseases such as stroke and acute arthritis.

Long-term acute care hospitals serve medically complex, chronically ill patients. These hospitals have the capability to treat patients who suffer from multiple systemic failures or conditions such as neurological disorders, head injuries, brain stem and spinal cord trauma, cerebral vascular accidents, chemical brain injuries, central nervous system disorders, developmental anomalies and cardiopulmonary disorders. Chronic patients are often dependent on technology for continued life support, such as mechanical ventilators, total parenteral nutrition, respiration or cardiac monitors and dialysis machines. While these patients suffer from conditions that require a high level of monitoring and specialized care, they may not necessitate the continued services of an intensive care unit. Due to their severe medical conditions, these patients generally are not clinically appropriate for admission to a skilled nursing facility or rehabilitation hospital.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our owned facilities as of December 31, 2004:

5

Table of Contents

6

Table of Contents

Competition

We generally compete with other REITs, including Health Care Property Investors, Inc., Senior Housing Properties Trust, Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated, Health Care REIT, Inc., Ventas Inc., LTC Properties, Inc., Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., National Health Investors, Inc and CNL Retirement Properties, real estate partnerships, healthcare providers and other investors, including, but not limited to, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, the Department of Housing and Urban Development and opportunity funds, in the acquisition, leasing and financing of healthcare facilities. The operators of the healthcare facilities compete on a local and regional basis with operators of facilities that provide comparable services. Operators compete for patients based on quality of care, reputation, physical appearance of facilities, price, services offered, family preferences, physicians, staff and location.

Regulation

Payments for healthcare services provided by the operators of our facilities are received principally from four sources: Medicaid, a medical assistance program for the indigent, operated by individual states with the financial participation of the federal government; Medicare, a federal health insurance program for the aged and certain chronically disabled individuals; private funds; and health and other insurance plans. Government revenue sources, particularly Medicaid programs, are the primary source of funding for most skilled nursing facilities and are subject to statutory and regulatory changes, administrative rulings, and government funding restrictions, all of which may materially increase or decrease the rates of payment to skilled nursing facilities which in turn might affect the amount of additional rents payable to us under our leases. Recently, primarily due to budget constraints, several states have either cut reimbursement under their Medicaid programs or are considering doing so. Medicare reimburses skilled nursing facility operators for nursing care, ancillary services and capital costs at a flat per diem rate. On October 1, 2004, Medicare reimbursement rates were increased by 2.8%. On October 1, 2003, Medicare reimbursement rates were increased by over 6%. Payments under reimbursement programs allocable to patients may not remain at levels comparable to the present levels or be sufficient to cover all the operating and fixed costs allocable to patients. Decreases in reimbursement levels could have an adverse impact on the revenues of the operators of our skilled nursing facilities, which could in turn adversely impact their ability to make their monthly lease or debt payments to us. Changes in reimbursement levels have very little impact on our assisted and independent living facilities because virtually all of their revenues are paid from private funds.

7

Table of Contents

There exist various federal and state regulations prohibiting fraud and abuse by healthcare providers, including those governing reimbursements under Medicaid and Medicare as well as referrals and financial relationships. Federal and state governments are devoting increasing attention to anti-fraud initiatives. Our operators may not comply with these current or future regulations, which could affect their ability to operate or to continue to make lease or mortgage payments.

Healthcare facilities in which we invest are also generally subject to federal, state and local licensure statutes and regulations and statutes which may require regulatory approval, in the form of a certificate of need (CON), prior to the addition or construction of new beds, the addition of services or certain capital expenditures. CON requirements generally apply to skilled nursing facilities. CON requirements are not uniform throughout the United States and are subject to change. In addition, some states have staffing and other regulatory requirements. We cannot predict the impact of regulatory changes with respect to licensure and CONs on the operations of our operators.

Executive Officers of the Company

The table below sets forth the name, position and age of each executive officer of the Company. Each executive officer is appointed by the board of directors, serves at its pleasure and holds office until a successor is appointed, or until the earliest of death, resignation or removal. There is no “family relationship” among any of the named executive officers or with any director. All information is given as of February 24, 2005:

Douglas M. Pasquale—President and Chief Executive Officer since April 2004 and a director since November 2003. Mr. Pasquale was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from November 2003 to April 2004. Mr. Pasquale served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ARV Assisted Living from December 1999 to September 2003. From April 2003 to September 2003, Mr. Pasquale simultaneously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Atria Senior Living Group. From March 1999 to December 1999, Mr. Pasquale served as the President and Chief Executive Officer at ARV and he served as the President and Chief Operating Officer at ARV from June 1998 to March 1999. Previously, Mr. Pasquale served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Richfield Hospitality Services, Inc. and Regal Hotels International—North America, a leading hotel ownership and hotel management company from 1996 to 1998 and as its Chief Financial Officer from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Pasquale is a member of the Executive Board of the American Seniors Housing Association (ASHA).

Donald D. Bradley—Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer since July 2004. Mr. Bradley was Senior Vice President and General Counsel from March 2001 to June 2004. From January 2000 to February 2001, Mr. Bradley was engaged in various personal interests. Mr. Bradley was formerly the General Counsel of Furon Company, a NYSE-listed international, high performance polymer manufacturer from 1990 to December 1999. Previously, Mr. Bradley served as a Special Counsel of O’Melveny & Myers LLP, an international law firm with which he had been associated since 1982. Mr. Bradley is a member of the Executive Board of ASHA.

Mark L. Desmond—Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 1996. Mr. Desmond was Vice President and Treasurer from May 1990 to December 1995 and Controller, Chief Accounting Officer

8

Table of Contents

and Assistant Treasurer from June 1988 to April 1990. From 1986 until joining our company, Mr. Desmond held various accounting positions with Beverly Enterprises, Inc., an operator of skilled nursing facilities, pharmacies and pharmacy related outlets. Mr. Desmond is a certified public accountant.

Abdo H. Khoury—Senior Vice President and Chief Portfolio Officer since August 2004. Mr. Khoury served as the Executive Vice President of Operations of Atria Senior Living Group (formerly ARV Assisted Living, Inc.) from June 2003 to March 2004. From January 2001 to May 2003, Mr. Khoury served as President of ARV and he served as Chief Financial Officer at ARV from March 1999 to January 2001. From October 1997 to February 1999, Mr. Khoury served as President of the Apartment Division at ARV. From January 1991 to September 1997, Mr. Khoury ran Financial Performance Group, a business and financial consulting firm located in Newport Beach, California.

David M. Boitano—Vice President and Senior Investment Officer since February 2002. From June 2000 until November 2001, Mr. Boitano was the Chief Operating Officer for Essential Markets, Inc., an information technology company. Mr. Boitano was the Senior Vice President of Finance and Acquisitions and Treasurer of Alterra Healthcare Corporation, an operator of assisted and independent living facilities, from November 1999 until May 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Boitano was the Senior Vice President of Finance and Acquisitions from October 1998 until October 1999 and the Vice President of Finance from May 1996 until September 1998, both also of Alterra. From March 1994 until May 1996, Mr. Boitano was the Chief Financial Officer of Crossings International Corporation, an operator of assisted living facilities. Mr. Boitano is a certified public accountant.

Steven J. Insoft—Vice President and Senior Investment Officer since February 1998. From August 1991 to January 1998, Mr. Insoft served as President of CMI Senior Housing & Healthcare, Inc., an operator of skilled nursing facilities. From 1988 to 1991, Mr. Insoft was an Associate in the Capital Markets Group of Prudential Insurance Company of America.

John J. Sheehan, Jr.—Vice President and Senior Investment Officer since February 1996. From April 1990 until joining our company, Mr. Sheehan was Vice President, Mortgage Finance for Life Care Centers of America, an operator and manager of skilled nursing facilities. From September 1987 through April 1990, Mr. Sheehan served as Director of Asset Management for Southmark Corporation, a real estate syndication company.

David E. Snyder—Corporate Controller since January 1998. Prior to joining the company, Mr. Snyder was the director of financial reporting at Regency Health Services, Inc. from November 1996 to December 1997. From October 1993 to October 1996, Mr. Snyder worked for Arthur Andersen LLP. Mr. Snyder is a certified public accountant.

Employees

As of February 24, 2005, we had 16 employees.

Available Information

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to reports required by Sections 13(a) and (15d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are electronically filed with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the Public Reference Room. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Our annual, quarterly and current reports, and amendments to reports are also available on our website at www.nhp-reit.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after those reports are available on the SEC’s website.

9

Table of Contents

Availability of Governance Principles and Board of Director Committee Charters

Our board of directors has adopted charters for its Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee. Our board of directors has also adopted Governance Principles. The Governance Principles and each of the charters are available on our website at www.nhp-reit.com. These materials, together with our Business Code of Conduct & Ethics referenced below, are available in print to any stockholder who requests them in writing by contacting:

Nationwide Health Properties, Inc.

610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1150

Newport Beach, California 92660

Attention: Mark L. Desmond

Business Code of Conduct & Ethics

Our board of directors has adopted a Business Code of Conduct & Ethics, which applies to all employees, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controller and directors. The Business Code of Conduct & Ethics is posted on our website at www.nhp-reit.com. Our Audit Committee must approve any waivers of the Business Code of Conduct & Ethics. We presently intend to disclose any amendments and waivers, if any are ever granted, of the Business Code of Conduct & Ethics on our website; however, if we change our intention, we will file any amendments or waivers with a current report on Form 8-K. There have been no waivers of the Business Code of Conduct & Ethics.

10

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Generally speaking, the risks facing our company fall into two categories: risks associated with the operations of our operators; and other risks unique to our operations. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below before making an investment decision in our company. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones facing us and there may be additional matters that we are unaware of or that we currently consider immaterial. All of these could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and, thus, the value of an investment in our company.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR OPERATORS

Our financial position could be weakened and our ability to make distributions could be limited if any of our major operators were unable to meet their obligations to us or failed to renew or extend their relationship with us as their lease terms expire or their mortgages mature, or if we were unable to lease or re-lease our facilities or make mortgage loans on economically favorable terms. There may end up being more serious operator financial problems that lead to more extensive restructurings or tenant disruptions than we currently expect. This could be unique to a particular operator or it could be more industry wide, such as further federal or state governmental reimbursement reductions in the case of our skilled nursing facilities as governments work through their budget deficits, continuing reduced occupancies or slow lease-ups for our assisted and independent living facilities due to general economic and other factors, continuing increases in liability, insurance premiums and other expenses. These adverse developments could arise due to a number of factors, including those listed below.

The bankruptcy, insolvency or financial deterioration of our operators could significantly delay our ability to collect unpaid rents or require us to find new operators for rejected facilities.

We are exposed to the risk that our operators may not be able to meet their obligations, which may result in their bankruptcy or insolvency. Although our leases and loans provide us the right to terminate an investment, evict an operator, demand immediate repayment and other remedies, the bankruptcy laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. An operator in bankruptcy may be able to restrict our ability to collect unpaid rent and interest during the bankruptcy proceeding.

The receipt of liquidation proceeds or the replacement of an operator that has defaulted on its lease or loan could be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the replacement of the operator licensed to manage the facility. In some instances, we may take possession of a property that exposes us to successor liabilities. These events, if they were to occur, could reduce our revenue and operating cash flow.

In addition, some of our leases provided for free rent at the beginning of the lease. These deferred amounts are repaid over the remainder of the lease term. Although the payment of cash rent is deferred, rental income is

11

Table of Contents

recorded on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease, such that the income recorded during the early years of the lease is higher than the actual cash rent received during that period, creating an asset on our balance sheet called deferred rent receivable. To the extent any of the operators under these leases, for the reasons discussed above, become unable to pay the deferred rents, we may be required to write down the rents receivable from those operators, which would reduce our net income.

Operators that fail to comply with governmental reimbursement programs such as Medicare or Medicaid, licensing and certification requirements, fraud and abuse regulations or new legislative developments may be unable to meet their obligations to us.

Our operators are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations that are subject to frequent and substantial changes (sometimes applied retroactively) resulting from legislation, adoption of rules and regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations of existing law. The ultimate timing or effect of these changes cannot be predicted. These changes may have a dramatic effect on our operators’ costs of doing business and the amount of reimbursement by both government and other third-party payors. The failure of any of our operators to comply with these laws, requirements and regulations could adversely affect their ability to meet their obligations to us. In particular:

12

Table of Contents

Our operators are faced with significant potential litigation and rising insurance costs that not only affect their ability to obtain and maintain adequate liability and other insurance, but also may affect their ability to pay their lease or mortgage payments and fulfill their insurance, indemnification and other obligations to us.

In some states, advocacy groups have been created to monitor the quality of care at skilled nursing facilities and assisted and independent living facilities, and these groups have brought litigation against operators. Also, in several instances, private litigation by skilled nursing facility patients or assisted and independent living facility residents or the families of either has succeeded in winning very large damage awards for alleged abuses. To a lesser extent, this litigation also has spilled over and affected assisted and independent living facilities. The effect of this litigation and potential litigation has been to materially increase the costs of monitoring and reporting quality of care compliance incurred by our tenants. In addition, the cost of liability and medical malpractice insurance has increased and may continue to increase so long as the present litigation environment continues. This has affected the ability of some of our operators to obtain and maintain adequate liability and other insurance and, thus, manage their related risk exposures. In addition to being unable to fulfill their insurance, indemnification and other obligations to us under their leases and mortgages and thereby potentially exposing us

13

Table of Contents

to those risks, this could cause our tenants to be unable to pay their lease or mortgage payments potentially decreasing our revenues and increasing our collection and litigation costs. Moreover, to the extent we are required to foreclose on the affected facilities, our revenues from those facilities could be reduced or eliminated for an extended period of time.

In addition, we may in some circumstances be named as a defendant in litigation involving the actions of our operators. For example, we have been named as a defendant in lawsuits for wrongful death at one of our facilities formerly operated by a now bankrupt operator with minimal insurance. Although we have no involvement in the activities of our operators and our standard leases generally require our operators to carry insurance to cover us in certain cases, a significant judgment against us in such litigation could exceed our and our operators’ insurance coverage, which would require us to make payments to cover the judgment.

Increased competition has resulted in lower revenues for some of our operators and may affect the ability of our tenants to meet their payment obligations to us.

The health care industry is highly competitive and we expect that it may become more competitive in the future. Our operators are competing with numerous other companies providing similar health care services or alternatives such as home health agencies, life care at home, community-based service programs, retirement communities and convalescent centers. In addition, past overbuilding in the assisted and independent living market caused a slow-down in the fill-rate of newly constructed buildings and a reduction in the monthly rate many newly built and previously existing facilities were able to obtain for their services and adversely impacted the occupancy of mature properties. This in turn resulted in lower revenues for the operators of certain of our facilities and contributed to the financial difficulties of some of our operators. While we believe that overbuilt markets should reach stabilization in the next several years and are less of a problem today due to minimal new development, we cannot be certain the operators of all of our facilities will be able to achieve occupancy and rate levels that will enable them to meet all of their obligations to us. Our operators are expected to encounter increased competition in the future, including through industry consolidations, that could limit their ability to attract residents or expand their businesses and therefore affect their ability to pay their lease or mortgage payments.

RISKS UNIQUE TO US AND OUR OPERATIONS

In addition to the operator related risks discussed above, there are a number of risks directly associated with us and our operations.

We are subject to particular risks associated with real estate ownership, which could result in unanticipated losses or expenses.

Our business is subject to many risks that are associated with the ownership of real estate. For example, if our operators do not renew their leases, we may be unable to re-lease the facilities at favorable rental rates. Other risks that are associated with real estate acquisition and ownership include, among other things, the following:

14

Table of Contents

We rely on external sources of capital to fund future capital needs, and if our access to such capital on reasonable terms is limited, we may not be able to meet maturing commitments or make future investments necessary to grow our business.

In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we are required, among other things, to distribute each year to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. Because of this distribution requirement, we will not be able to fund, from cash retained from operations, all future capital needs, including capital needs to satisfy or refinance maturing commitments and to make investments. As a result, we rely on external sources of capital. If we are unable to obtain needed capital at all or only on unfavorable terms from these sources, we might not be able to make the investments needed to grow our business, or to meet our obligations and commitments as they mature, which could negatively affect the ratings of our debt and even, in extreme circumstances, affect our ability to continue operations. Our access to capital depends upon a number of factors over which we have little or no control, including rising interest rates, inflation and other general market conditions and the market’s perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions and the market price of the shares of our capital stock. In the early 2000’s, difficult capital market conditions in our industry limited our access to capital and as a result our historic level of new investments decreased. Although we believe our access to capital today is good, we may again encounter difficult market conditions that could limit our access to capital. This could limit our ability to make future investments or possibly affect our ability to meet our maturing commitments.

Our potential capital sources include:

The market value of the equity securities of a REIT is generally based upon the market’s perception of the REIT’s growth potential and its current and potential future earnings and cash distributions. Our failure to meet the market’s expectation with regard to future earnings and cash distributions likely would adversely affect the market price of our common stock and reduce the value of your investment.

15

Table of Contents

Increasing investor interest in our sector and consolidation at the operator or REIT level could increase competition and reduce our profitability.

Our business is highly competitive and we expect that it may become more competitive in the future. We compete with a number of healthcare REITs and other financing sources, some of which are larger and have a lower cost of capital than we do. Recently, there has been increasing interest from large new REITs and other investors in the senior housing and long-term care real estate sector. Additionally, the potential for consolidation at the REIT or operator level appears to have increased. These developments could result in fewer investment opportunities for us and lower spreads over our cost of our capital, which would hurt our growth.

Two of the operators of our facilities each accounts for more than 10% of our revenues. If these operators experience financial difficulties, or otherwise fail to make payments to us, our revenues may significantly decline.

For the year ended December 31, 2004, as adjusted for facilities acquired and disposed of during that period, Alterra Healthcare Corporation accounted for 11% of our revenues and American Retirement Corporation, or ARC, accounted for 10% of our revenues. We cannot assure you that Alterra and ARC will continue to satisfy their respective obligations to us. For example, although Alterra emerged from bankruptcy in December 2003 following significant restructuring activities, none of which resulted in a loss of revenue to us, we cannot assure you of Alterra’s ongoing financial health following this restructuring. The failure or inability of Alterra or ARC to pay their respective obligations to us could materially reduce our revenues and net income, which could in turn reduce the amount of dividends we pay and cause our stock price to decline.

If we fail to maintain our REIT status, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates.

We intend to operate in a manner to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. While we believe that we have been organized and have operated in a manner which would allow us to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, it is possible that is not the case or that our future operations could cause us to fail to qualify. Qualification as a REIT requires us to satisfy numerous requirements established under highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions. For example, in order to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income in any year must be derived from qualifying sources, and we must pay dividends to stockholders aggregating at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income. You should be aware that future legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of qualification as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless we are entitled to relief under statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we lost qualification. If we lose

16

Table of Contents

our REIT status, our net earnings available for distribution to stockholders or investments would be significantly reduced for each of the years involved. In addition, we would no longer be required to make distributions to stockholders.

A downgrade of our credit rating could impair our ability to obtain additional debt financing on favorable terms, if at all, and significantly reduce the trading price of our common stock.

We currently have the lowest investment grade credit ratings of Baa3 from Moody’s Investors Service and BBB- from Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Fitch Ratings on our unsecured notes. If any of these rating agencies downgrade our credit rating, or place our rating under watch or review for possible downgrade, this could make it more difficult or expensive for us to obtain additional debt financing, and the trading price of our common stock will likely decline. Factors that may affect our credit rating include, among other things, our financial performance, our success in raising sufficient equity capital, our capital structure and level of indebtedness and pending or future changes in the regulatory framework applicable to our operators and our industry. We cannot assure you that these credit agencies will not downgrade our credit rating in the future.

Unforeseen costs associated with investments in new properties could reduce our profitability.

Our business strategy contemplates future investments that may not prove to be successful. For example, we might encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties, including contingent liabilities, and newly acquired properties might require significant management attention that would otherwise be devoted to our ongoing business. If we agree to provide funding to enable health care operators to build, expand or renovate facilities on our properties and the project is not completed, we could be forced to become involved in the development to ensure completion or we could lose the property. These costs may negatively affect our results of operations.

We may recognize losses on the sale of certain facilities.

From time to time, we classify certain facilities, including unoccupied buildings and land parcels, as assets held for sale. For example, as of December 31, 2004, assets held for sale totaled approximately $3,050,000. To the extent we are unable to sell these properties for book value, we may be required to take an impairment charge or loss on the sale, either of which would reduce our net income.

Our success depends in part on our ability to retain key personnel.

We depend on the efforts of our executive officers, particularly our Chief Executive Officer Mr. Douglas M. Pasquale and our Senior Vice Presidents Mr. Donald D. Bradley, Mr. Mark L. Desmond, and Mr. Abdo H. Khoury. The loss of the services of these persons or the limitation of their availability could have an adverse impact on our operations. Although we have entered into employment and/or security agreements with certain of these executive officers, these agreements may not assure their continued service.

As owners of real estate, we are subject to environmental laws that expose us to the possibility of having to pay damages to the government and costs of remediation if there is contamination on our property.

Under various laws, owners of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous substances present at a property, and may be held liable for property damage or personal injuries that result from environmental contamination. These laws also expose us to the possibility that we become liable to reimburse the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination, regardless of whether we were aware of, or responsible for, the environmental contamination. We review environmental surveys of the facilities we own prior to their purchase. Based upon those surveys we do not believe that any of our properties are subject to material environmental contamination. However, environmental liabilities may be present in our properties and we may incur costs to remediate contamination that could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition.

17

Table of Contents

If the holders of our notes exercise their rights to require us to repurchase their notes, we may have to make substantial payments, incur additional debt or issue equity securities to finance the repurchase.

Some of our medium-term notes grant the holders the right to require us, on specified dates, to repurchase their notes at a price equal to the principal amount of the notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the holders of these notes elect to require us to repurchase their notes, we may be required to make significant payments, which would adversely affect our liquidity. Alternatively, we could finance the repurchase through the issuance of additional debt securities, which may have terms that are not as favorable as the notes we are repurchasing, or equity securities, which will dilute the interests of our existing stockholders.

Our level of indebtedness may adversely affect our financial results.

As of December 31, 2004, we had total consolidated indebtedness of approximately $843,409,000 and total assets of approximately $1,710,111,000. We expect to incur additional indebtedness in the future. The risks associated with financial leverage include:

Our charter and bylaws and the laws of the state of our incorporation contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change in control or other transactions that could provide stockholders with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for our common stock.

In order to protect us against the risk of losing our REIT status for federal income tax purposes due to a rule that prevents five or fewer individuals from owning more than 50% of a REIT’s stock, our charter prohibits the ownership by any single person of more than 9.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of our voting stock. We have the right to redeem shares acquired or held in excess of the ownership limit. In addition, any acquisition of our common stock or preferred stock that would result in our disqualification as a REIT is null and void. The ownership limit may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company and could adversely affect our stockholders’ ability to realize a premium over the market price for the shares of our common stock. Our board of directors has increased the ownership limit of up to 20% with respect to one of our stockholders, Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. Based on SEC filings, Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. beneficially owned 7,738,000 of our shares, or approximately 11.58% of our common stock, as of December 31, 2004.

Our charter authorizes us to issue additional shares of common stock and one or more series of preferred stock and to establish the preferences, rights and other terms of any series of preferred stock that we issue. Although our board of directors has no intention to do so at the present time, it could establish a series of preferred stock that could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve the payment of a premium over the market price for our common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

In addition, the laws of our state of incorporation and the following provisions of our charter may delay, defer or prevent a transaction that may be in the best interests of our stockholders:

18

Table of Contents

See Item 1 for details.

There are various legal proceedings pending to which we are a party or to which some of our properties are subject arising in the normal course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

None.

19

Table of Contents

PART II

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. It has been our policy to declare quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock in order to comply with applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code governing real estate investment trusts. Set forth below are the high and low sales prices of our common stock from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2004 as reported by the New York Stock Exchange and the cash dividends per share paid with respect to such periods. Future dividends will be declared and paid at the discretion of our Board and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, our financial condition, relevant financing instruments, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and such other factors as our Board deems relevant. However, we currently expect to pay cash dividends in the future, comparable in amount to dividends recently paid.

As of February 24, 2005 there were approximately 1,200 holders of record of our common stock.

Equity compensation plan information is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the caption “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 27, 2005, filed or to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.

20

Table of Contents

The following table presents our selected financial data. Certain of this financial data has been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with those financial statements and accompanying notes and with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

21

Table of Contents

Overview

To facilitate your review and understanding of this section of our report and the financial statements that follow, we are providing this overview of what management believes are the most important considerations for understanding our company and its business—the key factors that drive our business and the principal associated risks.

The Company

We are a public equity REIT that invests in senior housing and long-term care properties.

Business Purpose

Our long-term corporate goal is clearly defined—to provide stockholders with an attractive total return based on a secure dividend. Our business model for achieving this goal is based on a foundation of proactive capital and portfolio management and quality FFO growth, and is equally straightforward. We invest passively in geographically diversified senior housing and long-term care properties (primarily assisted and independent living facilities and skilled nursing facilities), drawing on our extensive management expertise and operational experience in this real estate sector. Our focus remains on this sector because we continue to believe in its growth potential, as evidenced by the favorable demographics of a rapidly growing elderly population and the corresponding recognized need for additional and improved senior housing and long-term care alternatives.

Operations

We primarily make our investments by acquiring an ownership interest in facilities and leasing them to unaffiliated operators under “triple-net” “master” leases that pass all facility operating costs (insurance, property taxes, utilities, maintenance, capital improvements, etc.) through to the tenant operator. In addition, but intentionally to a much lesser extent because we view the risks of this activity to be greater, from time to time we extend mortgage loans and other financing to operators. Currently, about 96% of our revenues are derived from our leases, with the remaining 4% from our mortgage loans and other financing.

Last Three Years

In 2004, we continued the de-leveraging program started in early 2003 (which included a dividend reduction of about 20%) with a goal of creating a more conservative capital structure, providing greater financial flexibility to reliably finance growth and establishing a more secure base for our dividend. We accomplished this primarily by raising approximately $243,000,000 in net new equity, expanding our credit line by $250,000,000 to $400,000,000 and lowering our dividend payout ratio from 94% in 2003 to 90% in 2004 and 86% in the fourth quarter. As a result, we believe we have enhanced our credit statistics and balance sheet, helped preserve and strengthen our investment grade credit ratings (which Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Fitch Ratings affirmed in 2004) and positioned ourselves for further growth from a conservative base.

Our diluted “funds from operations” increased in 2004 over 2003 by over 16%. This increase in FFO primarily relates to a record year of $381,989,000 in new investments and the completion of a $13,351,000 independent and assisted living facility, greater internal growth and reduced interest expense as a result of our

22

Table of Contents

de-leveraging program and a low interest rate environment. We define “funds from operations” or FFO, the key measurement tool that most REIT managements looks to in running their businesses, as net income (excluding extraordinary items), less preferred stock dividends, plus depreciation and amortization, less gains/losses on sales of facilities. Our measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other REITs. Consequently, our funds from operations may not provide a meaningful measure of our performance as compared to that of other REITs or as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. Funds from operations does not represent cash generated from operating activities as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (funds from operations does not include changes in operating assets and liabilities) and, therefore, should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity.

Below we have listed some of the factors that have adversely impacted our FFO in the recent past and may again in the future. To help better anticipate and mitigate potential problems in the future, in 2004 we established a formal Portfolio Management Program and hired a Senior Vice President and Chief Portfolio Officer that reports directly to our Chief Executive Officer. Portfolio Management now joins Capital Management and Quality FFO Growth at center stage as the three drivers of our business.

23

Table of Contents

Focus and Outlook for 2005

Our focus for 2005 is to increase our net income and FFO on an absolute and per share basis. In that regard, we remain cautiously optimistic about both our internal and external growth prospects for 2005. We believe that the worst of the restructurings is behind us and, accordingly, like 2004, the annual rent increases built into our leases should overcome any reasonably foreseeable further restructurings. We expect “same store” internal growth to increase for 2005 largely as a result of investments in 2004 and rent escalators in our leases. This is likely to be offset this year, however, from lost revenues from loan payoffs in 2004 and potentially significant lost rent from likely purchase option exercises in 2005. While the market is extremely competitive at this point, we also are seeing a fair number of potentially attractive investment opportunities that we will carefully evaluate.

In management’s view, there are four principal near term challenges we face in achieving our business objectives. The first is the continued availability of competitively priced capital. This in turn is largely dependent on external factors such as interest rates and equity market volatility. If these factors end up being more adverse than we expect for 2005, it could adversely impact our ability to grow. The second is increasing interest in our sector from new REITs and other larger capital providers, which in turn is increasing competition and reducing spreads or limiting attractive investment opportunities. The third principal challenge is consolidation at either or both of the REIT or operator levels which is likely to result in better capitalized competitors and fewer customers. Finally, there may end up being more serious operator financial problems that lead to more extensive restructurings or tenant disruptions than we currently expect. This could be unique to a particular operator or it could be more industry wide, such as further federal or state governmental reimbursement reductions in the case of our skilled nursing facilities as governments work through their budget deficits, continuing reduced occupancies or slow lease-ups for our assisted and independent living facilities due to general economic and other factors, continuing increases in liability, insurance premiums and other expenses.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those that impact our most critical accounting policies. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following are our most critical accounting policies.

Revenue Recognition

Our rental revenue is accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 13 Accounting for Leases (SFAS No. 13) and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements (SAB No. 101) among other authoritative pronouncements. These pronouncements require us to account for the rental income on a straight-line basis unless a more appropriate method exists. We believe that the method most reflective of the use of a healthcare facility with fixed rate increases is the straight-line method. Straight-line accounting requires us to calculate the total fixed rent to be paid over the life of the lease and recognize that revenue evenly over that life. In a situation where a lease calls

24

Table of Contents

for fixed rental increases during the life of a lease or there is a period of free rent at the beginning of a lease, rental income recorded in the early years of a lease is higher than the actual cash rent received which creates an asset on the balance sheet called deferred rent receivable. At some point during the lease, depending on the rent levels and terms, this reverses and the cash rent payments received during the later years of the lease are higher than the rental income recognized, which reduces the deferred rent receivable balance to zero by the end of the lease. The majority of our leases do not contain fixed increases or provide for free or reduced rent at the beginning of the lease term. However, certain leases for facilities we have constructed have had free rent for the first three to six months and certain leases we entered into, primarily with regard to facilities returned to us by operators in bankruptcy have had reduced or free rent in the early months of the lease or fixed increases in future years. We record the rent for these facilities on a straight-line basis in accordance with SFAS No. 13. However, we also assess the collectibility of the deferred portion of the rent that is to be collected in a future period in accordance with SAB No. 101. This assessment is based on several factors, including the financial strength of the lessee and any guarantors, the historical operations and operating trends of the facility, the historical payment pattern of the facility and whether we intend to continue to lease the facility to the current operator, among others. If our evaluation of these factors indicates we may not receive the rent payments due in the future, we provide a reserve against the current rental income as an offset to revenue, and depending on the circumstances, we may provide a reserve against the existing deferred rent balance for the portion, up to its full value, that we estimate will not be recovered. This assessment requires us to determine whether there are factors indicating the future rent payments may not be fully collectible and to estimate the amount of the rent that will not be collected. If our assumptions or estimates regarding a lease change in the future, we may have to record a reserve to reduce or further reduce the rental revenue recognized and/or deferred rent receivable balance. We recognized $677,000 of cash received in excess of revenues during 2004, $553,000 of revenues in excess of cash received during 2003 and $2,400,000 of revenues in excess of cash received during 2002. There is $9,281,000 at December 31, 2004, and $9,400,000 at December 31, 2003, of deferred rent receivables, net of reserves, recorded under the caption “Other assets” on the balance sheets. The ultimate amount of deferred rent we realize could be less than amounts currently recorded.

Additional rents are generally computed as a percentage of facility revenues in excess of base amounts or as a percentage of the increase in the Consumer Price Index. We do not straight-line rent contingent on revenue increases or increases in the Consumer Price Index. Additional rents are generally calculated and payable monthly or quarterly, and most of our leases contain provisions such that total rent cannot decrease from one year to the next. While the calculations and payments of additional rents contingent upon revenue are generally made on a quarterly basis, SAB No. 101 does not allow for the recognition of this revenue until all possible contingencies have been eliminated. Most of our leases with additional rents contingent upon revenue are structured as quarterly calculations so that all contingencies for revenue recognition have been eliminated at each of our quarterly reporting dates.

Depreciation and Useful Lives of Assets

We calculate depreciation on our buildings and improvements using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives ranging up to 40 years, generally from 30 to 40 years. A significant portion of the cost of each property is allocated to building (generally approximately 90%). The allocation of the cost between land and building, and the determination of the useful life of a property, are based on management’s estimates. We calculate depreciation and amortization on equipment and lease costs using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of up to five years or the lease term, whichever is appropriate. We review and adjust useful lives periodically. If we do not allocate appropriately between land and building or we incorrectly estimate the useful lives of our assets, our computation of depreciation and amortization will not appropriately reflect the usage of the assets over future periods. If we overestimate the useful life of an asset, the depreciation expense related to the asset will be understated, which could result in a loss if the asset is sold in the future.

Asset Impairment

We review our long-lived assets individually on a quarterly basis to determine if there are indicators of impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

25

Table of Contents

(SFAS No. 144). Indicators may include, among others, the tenant’s inability to make rent payments, operating losses or negative operating trends at the facility level, notification by the tenant that it will not renew its lease, a decision to dispose of an asset or changes in the market value of the property. For operating assets, if indicators of impairment exist, we compare the undiscounted cash flows from the expected use of the property to its net book value to determine if impairment exists. If the sum of the future estimated undiscounted cash flows is higher than the current net book value, in accordance with SFAS No. 144, we conclude no impairment exists. If the sum of the future estimated undiscounted cash flows is lower than the current net book value, we recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the net book value of the asset and its estimated fair market value. To the extent we decide to sell an asset, we recognize an impairment loss if the current net book value of the asset exceeds its fair value less costs to sell. The above analyses require us to determine whether there are indicators of impairment for individual assets, to estimate the most likely stream of cash flows from operating assets and to determine the fair value of assets that are impaired or held for sale. If our assumptions, projections or estimates regarding an asset change in the future, we may have to record an impairment charge to reduce or further reduce the net book value of such asset. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we recorded an impairment of assets charge of $232,000 in discontinued operations related to one of our assets held for sale. During the year ended December 31, 2003, we recorded an impairment of assets charge of $645,000 in discontinued operations related to three of our assets held for sale.

Collectibility of Receivables

We evaluate the collectibility of our mortgage loans and other receivables on a regular basis. We evaluate the collectibility of receivables based on factors including, among others, payment history, the financial strength of the borrower and any guarantors, the value of the underlying collateral, the operations and operating trends of the underlying collateral, if any, and current economic conditions. If our evaluation of these factors indicates we may not recover the full value of the receivable, we provide a reserve against the portion of the receivable that we estimate will not be recovered. This analysis requires us to determine whether there are factors indicating a receivable may not be fully collectible and to estimate the amount of the receivable that will not be collected. If our assumptions or estimates regarding the collectibility of a receivable change in the future, we may have to record a reserve to reduce or further reduce the carrying value of the receivable. During 2004, we reserved $909,000 of delinquent rent and interest receivable from one tenant.

Impact of New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2003, the FASB released Interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51. In April 2003, the FASB released SFAS No. 149 Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. In May 2003, the FASB released SFAS No. 150 Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. In December 2004, the FASB released SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment. We adopted the original SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation in 1999 and have recognized all stock-based compensation in our income statement since that time. The effect of these pronouncements on our financial statements is not expected to be material.

Operating Results

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Rental income increased $26,633,000, or 18%, in 2004 as compared to 2003. The increase was primarily due to rental income from 46 facilities acquired and one facility that was completed during 2004 and rent increases at existing facilities. The increase was partially offset by rent reductions on certain facilities that were returned to us during 2004 and reserves against certain receivables that may not be collectible. Interest and other income decreased $1,571,000, or 12% in 2004 as compared to 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the early payoff of eight mortgage loans, the payoff at maturity of two mortgage loans, and partial repayments of four others during 2004.

Interest and amortization of deferred financing costs decreased $810,000 or 1%, in 2004 as compared to 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the payoff of $70,750,000 of fixed rate medium term notes in 2004, the

26

Table of Contents

payoff of $74,000,000 of fixed rate medium term notes during 2003 and a decrease in the weighted average balance on our unsecured credit facility versus last year. The decrease was almost entirely offset by interest related to $66,725,000 of assumed mortgage debt secured by eight facilities acquired during 2004 and interest on a $29,475,000 mortgage secured by one existing building financed during third quarter 2003. Depreciation and amortization increased $5,513,000, or 13%, in 2004 as compared to 2003. The increase was primarily related to depreciation on the 46 facilities acquired and one facility that completed development during 2004. General and administrative expenses increased $4,701,000, or 53%, in 2004 as compared to 2003. The increase was primarily due to a one time charge of $1,402,000 for retirement compensation related to our retiring chief executive officer, $1,485,000 of expense related to the lease-up of a restructured skilled nursing facility, the addition of a chief portfolio officer position, an increase in legal fees, Sarbanes-Oxley related expenses and increases in other general corporate expenses. We expect general and administrative expenses in 2005 to be relatively consistent with 2004.

Income from unconsolidated joint venture represents our 25% share of the income generated by the joint venture and our management fee of 2.5% of the revenues of the unconsolidated joint venture. Please see the caption “Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture” below for more information regarding the unconsolidated joint venture.

Discontinued operations reflects income of $3,523,000 in 2004 versus a loss of $2,174,000 in 2003. Discontinued operations consists of gain/loss on sale of facilities and income/loss from discontinued operations. The gain on sale of facilities in 2004 of $3,750,000 resulted from the sale of two skilled nursing facilities, two assets held for sale and one land parcel for total cash proceeds of $6,464,000, and the recognition of $1,636,000 of deferred gain upon the payoff of three mortgage loans. The loss on sale of facilities in 2003 of $2,725,000 resulted from the sale of ten facilities, four buildings held for sale and four land parcels held for sale. The loss in discontinued operations of $227,000 is a reduction of $778,000 from the income of $551,000 for the same period in 2003. The loss for 2004 is comprised of revenues of $332,000 less depreciation on the facilities sold in 2004 of $140,000, general and administrative expenses related to assets held for sale of $187,000 and an impairment of $232,000 related to one asset held for sale. The income for 2003 is comprised of $2,780,000 of rental income offset by $973,000 of depreciation and amortization, $611,000 of general and administrative expenses and an impairment of assets charge of $645,000 related to three assets held for sale. The difference in the composition of the loss from discontinued operations was primarily caused by the fact that the facilities sold in 2003 had income in 2003, but do not have income in 2004, the facilities sold in 2004 had income in 2003 but had income for only a portion of 2004 and the assets held for sale generate expenses, but generally do not produce income. Any future income/loss in discontinued operations would result from future sales of facilities or reclassifications of facilities to assets held for sale.

We expect to receive increased rent and interest at individual facilities because our leases and mortgages generally contain provisions under which rents or interest income increase with increases in facility revenues and/or increases in the Consumer Price Index. If revenues at our facilities and/or the Consumer Price Index do not increase, our revenues may not continue to increase. Sales of facilities or repayments of mortgage loans receivable would serve to offset revenue increases, and if sales and repayments exceed additional investments this could actually reduce revenues. Our leases could renew below or above the aggregate existing rent level, so the impact of lease renewals may cause a decrease or an increase in the total rent we receive. We currently have only three leases covering six facilities expiring in 2005. Several of our tenants have purchase options that may be exercised in 2005, and we believe a number of these will be exercised. The exercise of purchase options by tenants would also cause a decrease in the total rent we receive. We currently have no scheduled mortgage loan maturities in 2005. Additional investments in healthcare facilities would increase rental and/or interest income. As additional investments in facilities are made, depreciation and/or interest expense will also increase. We expect any such increases to be at least partially offset by rent or interest income associated with the investments.

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002

Rental income increased $11,614,000, or 9%, in 2003 as compared to 2002. The increase was primarily due to rental income from three facilities acquired during 2003 and 46 facilities acquired during 2002, rental income

27

Table of Contents

from five facilities we acquired during 2002 that previously had an aggregate mortgage loans receivable balance of $29,146,000 and rent increases at existing facilities. The increase was partially offset by rent reductions on certain facilities that were returned to us and leased to other operators in 2003 and 2002. Interest and other income decreased by $818,000, or 6%, in 2003 as compared to 2002. The decrease was primarily due to the payoff at par of mortgage loans receivable totaling $17,422,000 securing six facilities, acquiring title to five facilities previously having an aggregate mortgage loans receivable balance of $29,146,000 during 2002 and regular principal repayments of notes receivable during 2003 and 2002. The decrease was partially offset by interest earned on a new mortgage loan with a balance of $2,615,000 in 2003 and a new mortgage loan with a balance of $7,051,000 in 2002.

Interest and amortization of deferred financing costs increased $1,532,000, or 3%, in 2003 as compared to 2002. The increase was primarily due to the issuance of $100,000,000 of fixed rate medium-term notes in third quarter 2002, the assumption of a $14,227,000 mortgage note on one facility acquired during second quarter 2002 and obtaining a $29,475,000 mortgage secured by one existing facility in third quarter 2003. The increase was partially offset by the payoff of $74,000,000 of fixed rate medium-term notes during 2003, the payoff of $50,000,000 of fixed rate medium-term notes during 2002, a reduction in the average balance on our unsecured revolving credit facility during 2003 and a reduction in the average interest rates on our unsecured revolving credit facility. Depreciation and amortization increased $6,636,000, or 18%, in 2003 as compared to 2002. The increase was due primarily to depreciation on the 46 facilities acquired during 2002, the acquisition of three facilities during 2003 and acquiring title to five facilities previously having an aggregate mortgage loans receivable balance of $29,146,000 during 2002. General and administrative expenses increased $1,042,000, or 13%, in 2003 as compared to 2002 primarily due to expenses related to facilities returned to us and leased to other operators in 2003, increases in legal fees related to operators in bankruptcy, the addition of a chief operating officer position and increase in other general corporate expenses.

Income from unconsolidated joint venture represents our 25% share of the income generated by the joint venture and our management fee of 2.5% of the revenues of the unconsolidated joint venture. The increase of $741,000, or 62%, in 2003 as compared to 2002 is due to the 49 joint venture owned facilities generating revenue for all of 2003, versus 43 facilities producing revenue from April 2002 to September 2002 and 49 facilities producing revenue from October 2002 to December 2002. Please see the caption “Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture” below for more information regarding the unconsolidated joint venture.

Discontinued operations reflects a loss of $2,174,000 in 2003 versus a loss of $4,263,000 in 2002. Discontinued operations consists of gain/loss on sale of facilities and income/loss from discontinued operations. The loss on sale of facilities of $2,725,000 in 2003 is due to the sale of ten facilities, four buildings held for sale and four land parcels held for sale. The gain on sale of facilities of $2,603,000 in 2002 is due to the sale of six facilities, five buildings held for sale and one land parcel held for sale. The income from discontinued operations in 2003 reflects the revenues less the depreciation and amortization and other expenses related to the facilities sold and those classified as held for sale during 2003 offset by an impairment of assets charge of $645,000 related to three assets held for sale. The loss from discontinued operations in 2002 reflects an impairment of assets charge of $10,828,000 related to 12 assets held for sale partially offset by the revenues less the depreciation and amortization and other expenses related to the facilities sold and those classified as held for sale during 2003 and 2002. The income from discontinued operations in 2003 of $551,000 is significantly higher than the loss from discontinued operations in 2002 of $6,866,000, primarily due to the impairment of assets charge of $10,828,000 in 2002 versus an impairment of assets charge of only $645,000 in 2003, the facilities disposed of in 2003 being included in income from discontinued operations for only the portion of 2003 prior to their sale while they were included for all of 2002 and the facilities disposed of in 2002 being included in income from discontinued operations for the portion of 2002 prior to their sale.

Information Regarding Certain Operators

As of December 31, 2004, none of our tenant operators remained in Chapter 11 reorganization bankruptcy proceedings.

28

Table of Contents

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture

During 2001, we entered into a joint venture with JER Senior Housing, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of JER Partners, an institutional investor. The joint venture was established to invest up to $130,000,000, of which over $127,000,000 was invested, in healthcare facilities similar to those already owned by us. We hold a 25% equity interest in the venture. The financial statements of the joint venture are not consolidated with our financial statements and our investment is accounted for using the equity method. No investments were made by or into this joint venture prior to 2002.

During 2004, the joint venture sold two facilities for cash proceeds of $4,366,000 resulting in a loss of $465,000, which is included in discontinued operations.

The joint venture owns 47 assisted living facilities in 12 states that are leased to Alterra. The joint venture was financed with secured non-recourse debt of approximately $60,860,000, capital contributions from our co-joint venturer of approximately $49,100,000 and capital contributions from us of approximately $16,400,000. We do not expect to make any additional contributions to the joint venture related to the facilities it acquired during 2002. The joint venture sold one facility during 2005, however the impact of the sale is not material to us.

The joint venture agreement contains reciprocal buy/sell provisions that allow either of us at any time to offer to buy out the other’s interest in the venture. If such an offer is made, the recipient then has the choice to either accept the offer and sell its interest on those terms or reject the offer and buy the offeror’s interest on the same economic terms.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities for 2004 increased $25,936,000 over 2003. This was primarily due to increased revenues of $25,062,000 discussed above, partially offset by increases in interest expense and general and administrative expenses. There have been no significant changes in the underlying sources and uses of cash provided by operating activities.

Investing Activities

During 2004, we acquired 13 skilled nursing facilities, 28 assisted and independent living facilities and five specialty hospitals in 18 separate transactions for an aggregate investment of $381,989,000, including the assumption of $66,725,000 of mortgage financing. We also completed the development of a $13,351,000 independent and assisted living facility, of which $5,764,000 was funded in 2004, and funded $10,634,000 in expansions, construction and capital improvements at certain facilities in accordance with existing lease provisions. Such expansions, construction and capital improvements generally result in an increase in the minimum rents earned by us on these facilities either at the time of funding or upon completion of the project. At December 31, 2004, we have committed to fund additional expansions, construction and capital improvements of approximately $18,000,000. On February 1, 2005, we acquired 10 skilled nursing facilities in one transaction with a purchase price of $39,912,000.

During 2004, we sold two skilled nursing facilities to the operators of the facilities pursuant to purchase options, two assets held for sale and one land parcel for cash proceeds of $6,464,000. These sales resulted in a gain of $2,114,000 that is included in gain on sale of facilities in discontinued operations. We also sold the skilled nursing portion of a continuing care retirement community, at net book value, for which we provided a mortgage loan to the buyer of $8,500,000. In addition, gain on sale for 2004 includes $1,636,000 of deferred gain related to the payoff of three purchase financing mortgage loans.

29

Table of Contents

During 2004, eight mortgage loans receivable were prepaid in full and two were repaid at maturity with principal balances totaling $22,839,000 and partial principal prepayments of $4,231,000 were received related to other mortgage loans. The payoff of three of these mortgage loans receivable resulted in a gain of $1,636,000 that is included in gain on sale of facilities in discontinued operations.

Financing Activities

During 2004, we repaid $70,750,000 of fixed rate medium-term notes that bore interest at a weighted average rate of 9.1%. The repayments were funded by borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facility and by cash on hand.

We anticipate repaying maturing medium-term notes with a combination of proceeds from borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facility and cash on hand. Borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facility would be repaid by potential asset sales and mortgage loans receivable payoffs, the potential issuance of debt or equity securities under the shelf registration statements discussed below or cash from operations. Our medium-term notes have been investment grade rated since 1994. Our current ratings are Baa3 from Moody’s Investors Service, BBB- from Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and BBB- from Fitch Ratings.

On April 15, 2004, our new $400,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility became effective and replaced our previous $150,000,000 credit facility. At December 31, 2004, we had $214,000,000 available under our $400,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility that expires on April 15, 2007, which we may extend for an additional year. The new credit facility, including the required financial covenants, is substantially the same as the prior credit facility with the only significant changes being the total amount available for borrowing, the new maturity date of April 15, 2007, an increase in the maximum secured debt ratio from 15% to 30% and a reduction in our LIBOR borrowing spread from 120 basis points to 107.5 basis points. In November 2004, we obtained an amendment to the credit facility that excludes borrowings under the credit facility from the floating rate debt covenant.

Under covenants contained in the credit agreement, we are required to maintain, among other things: (i) a minimum net asset value of $500,000,000; (ii) a ratio of total indebtedness to capitalization value of not more than 60%; (iii) an interest coverage ratio of at least 2.5 to 1.0; (iv) a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.75 to 1.0; (v) a secured indebtedness ratio of not more than 30%; (vi) an unsecured interest coverage ratio of at least 2.5 to 1.0; (vii) floating rate debt, excluding credit facility borrowings, of no more than 25% of total debt; (viii) an unencumbered asset value ratio of no more than 60%; and (ix) a minimum rent/mortgage interest coverage ratio of at least 1.25 to 1.0. As of December 31, 2004, we were in compliance with all of the above covenants. We believe we have sufficient margin in the various debt covenants that we expect to remain in compliance throughout 2005.

In January 2004, we issued 7,475,000 shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering at a price of $19.73 per share. This issuance resulted in net proceeds of approximately $139,700,000 after underwriting discounts and legal and other fees of approximately $7,800,000. The net proceeds were used to repay all of the then outstanding borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility of $96,000,000 and the remaining proceeds of approximately $43,700,000 were initially invested as cash and cash equivalents and ultimately used to fund acquisitions subsequent to the public offering and for other general corporate purposes.

In July 2004, we issued 1,064,500 shares of 7.75% Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $100 per share. The combined issuances resulted in net proceeds of approximately $103,000,000 after underwriting discounts and other fees of approximately $3,450,000. The net proceeds were used to repay borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into our common stock at the option of the holder at an initial conversion price of $22.74 per share upon the occurrence of certain events, including our stock reaching a price of $28.43 per share. We may redeem the Series B Preferred Stock after July 5, 2009 at the redemption price of $103.875 per share, reducing each year by $0.775, until reaching par, or $100.00 in July 2014.

30

Table of Contents

During 2003, we adopted a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan. This plan enables existing stockholders to purchase additional shares of common stock by automatically reinvesting all or part of the cash dividends paid on their shares of common stock. The plan also allows investors to acquire shares of our common stock, subject to certain limitations, including a maximum monthly investment of $10,000, at a discount ranging from 0% to 5%, determined by us from time to time in accordance with the plan. The discount during 2004 and at December 31, 2004 was 2%. During the year ended December 31, 2004, we issued approximately 330,000 shares of common stock, at an average price of $21.13, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $6,954,000 that were used to repay borrowings on our unsecured revolving credit facility.

At December 31, 2004, we had shelf registration statements on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under which we may issue (a) up to $316,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of medium-term notes and (b) up to approximately $246,068,000 of securities including debt, convertible debt, common and preferred stock. In addition, at December 31, 2004, we had approximately 4,493,000 shares available for issuance under our dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan.

We did not utilize any off-balance sheet financing arrangements nor have any unconsolidated subsidiaries prior to second quarter 2002. The only off-balance sheet financing arrangement that we currently utilize is the unconsolidated joint venture discussed above under the caption “Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Venture.”

Financing for future investments and for the repayment of the obligations and commitments noted above may be provided by borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility discussed above, private placements or public offerings of debt or equity either under the shelf registration statements discussed above or under new registration statements, the assumption of secured indebtedness, obtaining mortgage financing on a portion of our owned portfolio or through joint ventures. We believe the combination of the available balance on the unsecured revolving credit facility and the availability under the shelf registration statements is sufficient to meet our expected cash requirements for 2005.

We anticipate the possible sale of certain facilities, primarily due to purchase option exercises, and the potential repayment of certain mortgage loans receivable during 2005. In the event that there are facility sales or mortgage loan receivable repayments in excess of new investments, revenues may decrease. We anticipate using the proceeds from any facility sales or mortgage loans receivable repayments to provide capital for future investments, to reduce the outstanding balance on our unsecured revolving credit facility or to repay other borrowings as they mature. Any such reduction in debt levels would result in reduced interest expense that we believe would partially offset any decrease in revenues. We believe the combination of the available balance on our new $400,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility and the availability under the shelf registration statements provides sufficient liquidity and financing capability to finance anticipated future investments, maintain our current dividend level and repay borrowings at or prior to their maturity, for at least the next 12 months.

Contractual Obligations and Cash Requirements

As of December 31, 2004, our contractual obligations are as follows:

31

Table of Contents

The long-term debt amount shown maturing in 2006-2007 includes the current balance on our unsecured revolving credit facility of $186,000,000 that expires on April 15, 2007. We have the ability to unilaterally extend the facility for one additional year. Prior to, or upon expiration, we expect to replace the facility rather than repay the outstanding balance.

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure

Certain information contained in this report includes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance and underlying assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical facts. These statements may be identified, without limitation, by the use of forward looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “intends,” “should” or comparable terms or the negative thereof. All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us on the date hereof. These statements speak only as of the date hereof and we assume no obligation to update such forward-looking statements. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the statements. These risks and uncertainties include (without limitation) the following:

We are exposed to market risks related to fluctuations in interest rates on our mortgage loans receivable and debt. We do not utilize interest rate swaps, forward or option contracts on foreign currencies or commodities, or other types of derivative financial instruments. The purpose of the following analyses is to provide a framework to understand our sensitivity to hypothetical changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2004. Readers are cautioned that many of the statements contained in these paragraphs are forward looking and should be read in conjunction with our disclosures under the heading “Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure” set forth above.

32

Table of Contents

We provide mortgage loans to operators of healthcare facilities as part of our normal operations. The majority of the loans have fixed rates. Three of our mortgage loans have adjustable rates; however, the rates adjust only once or twice over the term of the loans and the minimum adjusted rates are equal to the then current rates. Therefore, all mortgage loans receivable are treated as fixed rate notes in the table and analysis below.

We utilize debt financing primarily for the purpose of making additional investments in healthcare facilities. Historically, we have made short-term borrowings on our variable rate unsecured revolving credit facility to fund our acquisitions until market conditions were appropriate, based on management’s judgment, to issue stock or fixed rate debt to provide long-term financing.

A portion of our secured debt is variable rate debt in the form of housing revenue bonds that were assumed in connection with the acquisition of certain healthcare facilities. Pursuant to the associated lease arrangements, increases or decreases in the interest rates on the housing revenue bonds would be substantially offset by increases or decreases in the rent received by us on the properties securing this debt. Therefore, there is substantially no market risk associated with this variable rate secured debt.

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, the borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility have increased from $63,000,000 to $186,000,000.

For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair market value, but do not impact earnings or cash flows. Conversely, for variable rate debt other than the housing revenue bonds described above, changes in interest rates generally do not impact fair market value, but do affect the future earnings and cash flows. We generally cannot prepay fixed rate debt prior to maturity. Therefore, interest rate risk and changes in fair market value should not have a significant impact on the fixed rate debt until we would be required to refinance such debt. Holding the variable rate debt balance constant, and including the bank borrowings as variable rate debt due to its nature, each one percentage point increase in interest rates would result in an increase in interest expense for the coming year of approximately $2,088,000.

The table below details the principal amounts and the average interest rates for the mortgage loans receivable and debt for each category based on the final maturity dates. Certain of the mortgage loans receivable and certain items in the various categories of debt require periodic principal payments prior to the final maturity date. The fair value estimates for the mortgage loans receivable are based on the estimates of management and on rates currently prevailing for comparable loans. The fair market value estimates for debt securities are based on discounting future cash flows utilizing current rates offered to us for debt of a similar type and remaining maturity.