Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 000-18674

MAPICS, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1000 Windward Concourse Parkway, Suite 100

Alpharetta, Georgia 30005

(Address of principal executive offices)

(678) 319-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at February 2, 2005 was 25,869,587.

Table of Contents

MAPICS, Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: Financial Statements

MAPICS, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

MAPICS, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

MAPICS, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

MAPICS, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(1) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited; however, in our opinion, these condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal, recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods indicated.

We have prepared the accompanying financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. As permitted by the rules of the SEC applicable to quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, these financial statements are condensed and consolidated, consisting of the condensed financial statements of MAPICS, Inc. and our subsidiaries. We also have condensed these notes, and they do not contain all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.

We operate on a fiscal year ending September 30^th. The terms “fiscal 2002”, “fiscal 2003”, “fiscal 2004” refer to our fiscal years ended September 30, 2002, 2003, and 2004. The term “fiscal 2005” refers to our fiscal year ending September 30, 2005. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year.

(2) Stock-Based Compensation

As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation,” and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an Amendment of FASB Statement No.123,” we continue to apply the accounting provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related Interpretations in accounting for our stock option plans and our employee stock purchase plan and the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148. We did not record stock-based compensation expense related to outstanding stock options in the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, as all options granted under our plans had an exercise price equal to fair market value at the grant date.

SFAS No. 148 requires us to provide pro forma disclosure of the impact on our results of operations had we adopted the expense measurement provisions of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123 permits the use of either a fair value based method or the intrinsic value method to measure the expense associated with our stock option plans and our employee stock purchase plan. The pro forma impact on our results of operations had we adopted the fair value based method of SFAS No. 123 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model is shown below (in thousands, except per share data):

(3) Revenue Recognition

We generate revenues primarily by licensing software, providing software support and maintenance and providing professional services to our customers. We record all revenues in accordance with the guidance provided by Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” SOP 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, ‘Software Revenue Recognition, with Respect to Certain Transactions’,” Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” SAB 104, “Revenue Recognition,” and American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Technical Practice Aid (TPA) 5100.53, “Fair Value of PCS in a Short-Term Time-Based License and Software Revenue Recognition.”

6

Table of Contents

Software License and Support Services Revenue

We generate a significant portion of total revenue from licensing software. Our sales channel consists of our direct sales force and our global network of independent affiliates. We license our software products under license agreements, which the ultimate customer typically executes directly with us rather than with our independent affiliates. Our license agreements are either perpetual license agreements or annual renewable term license agreements.

Under our perpetual license agreements, we record both an initial license fee and an annual support fee. We record initial license fees as license revenue and typically recognize revenue when the following criteria are met:

(1) the signing of a license agreement between us and the ultimate customer;

(2) delivery of the software to the customer or to a location designated by the customer;

(3) fees are fixed or determinable; and

(4) determination that collection of the related receivable is probable.

The annual support fee, which is typically paid in advance, entitles the customer to receive twelve months of support services, as available. We record these annual support fees as services revenue and recognize this revenue ratably over the term of the agreement.

For our annual renewable term license agreements, when we first license a product, we receive both an initial license fee and an annual license fee. Our customers may renew the license for an additional one-year period upon payment of the annual license fee. Provided all other elements of revenue recognition are met, we recognize the initial license fees under these annual renewable term licenses ratably as license revenue over the initial license period, which is generally twelve months. In addition, payment of the annual license fee entitles the customer to available software support for another year. If the annual license fee is not paid, the customer is no longer entitled to use the software and we may terminate the agreement. We record this annual license fee as support services revenue ratably over the term of the agreement.

The license agreements for our software products include a limited express warranty. The warranty provides that the product, in its unaltered form, will perform substantially in accordance with our related documentation for a period of up to 90 days from delivery in most cases. A small percentage of our contracts have limited express warranties that cover a period of up to three years. These contracts relate to the SyteLine^® product acquired in our February 2003 acquisition of Frontstep, Inc. No new contracts containing this specific type of warranty are planned to be used in the future. If the product does not perform substantially in accordance with the documentation, we may repair or replace the product or terminate the license and refund the license fees paid for the product. All other warranties are expressly disclaimed. In addition to this warranty and in return for the payment of annual license or support fees, we provide customers with available annual maintenance services that include electronic usage support and defect repairs. In most instances, a product workaround and repair can be made and such repairs are delivered as part of maintenance services. Historically, we have not experienced any significant warranty claim losses related to our products, and we have no reason to believe that we will incur any material claim losses in the future.

Implementation and Consulting Services Revenue

Under the terms of our license agreements, our customers are responsible for implementation and training. Our professional services organization or, in many instances, our independent affiliates provide our customers with the consulting and implementation services relating to our products. We provide our consulting and implementation services under services agreements, and we charge for them separately under time and materials arrangements or, in some circumstances, under fixed price arrangements. The professional services that we provide are generally not essential to the functionality of our delivered products. We recognize revenues from time and materials arrangements as the services are performed, provided that the customer has a contractual obligation to pay, the fee is non-refundable, and collection is probable. Under a fixed price arrangement, we recognize revenue on the basis of the estimated percentage of completion of service provided. We recognize changes in estimates in the period in which they are determined. We recognize provisions for losses, if any, in the period in which they first become probable and reasonably estimable.

We also offer educational courses and training materials to our customers and affiliates. These consulting and implementation services and education courses are included in implementation and consulting services revenue, and revenue is recognized when services are provided.

7

Table of Contents

(4) Computation and Presentation of Net Income Per Common Share

We apply SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share,” which requires us to present “basic” and “diluted” net income per common share for all periods presented in the statements of operations. We compute basic net income per common share, which excludes dilution, by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if holders of our unvested restricted common stock, common stock options and common stock warrants converted, became vested in or exercised their holdings into common stock that then shared in our earnings.

The following table presents the calculations of basic and diluted net income per common share or common share equivalent (in thousands, except per share data):

(5) Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income were as follows (in thousands):

(6) Income Taxes

The reported income tax expense for the three months ended December 31, 2004 was calculated based on our projected annual effective tax rate of 42.0%. For the three months ended December 31, 2003, our reported income tax was calculated based upon an overall effective tax rate of 37.0%. The reported income tax expense for the three months ended December 31, 2004 differs from the expected income tax expense calculated by applying the federal statutory rate of 35.0% to our income before income tax expense primarily due to the impact of state and foreign taxes and changes in the valuation allowance. The reported income tax expense for the three months ended December 31, 2003 differs from the expected income tax expense calculated by applying the federal statutory rate of 35.0% to our income before income tax expense primarily due to the impact of state and foreign income taxes.

At December 31, 2004, we had domestic federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of $29.8 million and research and experimentation and other credit carryforwards of $9.5 million. At December 31, 2004, we also had $15.7 million of foreign NOL carryforwards. The domestic NOL carryforwards and tax credits at December 31, 2004 expire between fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2023. The utilization of a significant portion of the domestic NOL carryforwards and tax credits is limited on an annual basis due to various changes in the ownership of MAPICS and previously acquired companies. We do not believe that these limitations will significantly impact our ability to utilize the NOL carryforwards of MAPICS, Frontstep and a previously acquired company, Pivotpoint, Inc., and MAPICS and Pivotpoint’s tax credits before they expire. However, we estimate that these limitations will impact our ability to utilize Frontstep’s tax credits. As a result, a significant portion of these credits is included in our valuation allowance in connection with the purchase price allocation of Frontstep. We also increased our valuation allowance for certain of our foreign NOL carryforwards as follows:

8

Table of Contents

Changes in deferred income tax valuation allowances (in thousands):

We believe these NOL carryforwards and tax credits will continue to result in cash savings in future periods as we use them to offset income taxes payable. We have recorded the net deferred tax assets at the amount we believe is more likely than not to be realized. We still retain additional uncertain favorable income tax attributes in connection with the 1997 separation of Marcam Corporation into two companies, and additional income tax benefits related to these tax attributes may be realized in future periods if and when they become certain. We have recorded the net deferred tax assets at the amount we believe is more likely than not to be realized.

(7) Intangible Assets

Intangible assets that have finite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Our intangible assets consist principally of tradenames, trademarks, maintenance contracts, and installed customer base and affiliate network, and we consider all to have finite lives. The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization, and net carrying amount of our amortized intangible assets are detailed below:

Amortized Intangible Assets (in thousands):

We acquired $5.8 million of identifiable intangible assets as part of the Frontstep acquisition. These assets consisted of a $0.9 million tradename and $4.8 million in maintenance contracts and are being amortized over the remaining estimated life. The weighted average amortization lives of the acquired tradename and maintenance contracts is 5 years.

The $8.3 million of installed customer base and affiliate network consists of the $6.0 million MAPICS installed customer base intangible asset and the acquired $2.3 million Pivotpoint installed customer base intangible asset. The weighted average amortization lives of the installed customer base and affiliate network is 13 years. All of our intangible assets will be fully amortized by February 2008.

Aggregate Amortization Expense (in thousands):

Estimated Amortization Expense for the Fiscal Years Ending (in thousands):

9

Table of Contents

(8) Restructuring and Exit Costs Reserve

We recorded restructuring costs of $4.7 million in fiscal 2002 principally resulting from a five-year agreement with an offshore information technology services company to perform a variety of our ongoing product development activities. During fiscal 2003, we recorded exit costs of $8.0 million relating to the Frontstep acquisition, of which $6.2 million was included in the cost of the acquisition and recorded in the purchase price allocation. We recorded the remaining $1.8 million in exit costs as restructuring costs in our consolidated statement of operations for fiscal 2003. The $8.0 million of exit costs included employee severance and related costs for approximately 175 employees from all areas of the combined company. During fiscal 2004, we recorded exit costs of $2.6 million primarily related to a work force reduction in our North America and Latin America (Americas) region and our Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region, which were included in restructuring costs in our consolidated statement of operations.

The restructuring costs of $4.7 million during fiscal 2002 were due to staff and facility reductions as a result of the five-year agreement with the offshore information technology services company to perform a variety of our ongoing product development activities. This outsourcing of product development activities was a contributing factor in a planned reduction of our worldwide workforce by approximately 12% during fiscal 2002. The restructuring charge of $4.7 million during fiscal 2002 included $3.7 million related to the abandonment of excess office space and $1.0 million related to employee severance and related costs for approximately 65 employees, primarily product development and support personnel. During fiscal 2003, we adjusted our previously recorded liability by $276,000 in order to reclaim office space that was previously abandoned.

The total exit cost of $6.2 million during fiscal 2003 that was included in the Frontstep purchase price allocation included $3.3 million in abandonment of office space and related costs and $2.4 million in employee severance and related costs for approximately 85 employees from all areas of Frontstep. Additionally, exit costs included obligations remaining pursuant to a $450,000 consulting agreement that was subsequently terminated on February 21, 2003. We accounted for these costs in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.” These are acquisition costs for which the combined company will receive no future economic benefit. In fiscal 2004, we recorded an adjustment of $0.9 million to our purchase price allocation related to a terminated lease agreement for which we had previously recorded an accrual for the vacated space.

We accounted for the remaining $1.8 million of exit costs during fiscal 2003 as restructuring costs on our consolidated statement of operations under the provisions of SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”, which is effective for exit or disposal activities that were initiated after December 31, 2002. These costs included $2.1 million in employee severance and related costs for approximately 90 employees from all areas of the company and a recovery of $0.3 million of a previous accrual as discussed below. Restructuring activities for comparative periods prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 146 have been accounted for in accordance with EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).”

The $2.6 million in exit costs that we recorded in fiscal 2004 primarily related to employee severance and related costs for approximately 70 employees from all areas in our Americas and EMEA regions, The $2.6 million in exit costs were included in restructuring costs on our consolidated statement of operations and accounted for under the provisions of SFAS No. 112, “Employers’ Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.” The work force reduction during fiscal 2004 was done primarily to reduce costs.

The major components of the restructuring and exit costs reserve at December 31, 2004 were as follows (in thousands):

10

Table of Contents

We expect future cash expenditures related to these restructuring activities to be approximately $2.9 million. We expect to pay approximately $1.2 million during the next twelve months, and we therefore have included this amount in current liabilities. We expect to pay the remaining $1.7 million before or during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007.

As shown in the table above, our restructuring and exit costs reserve at December 31, 2004 is comprised of the estimated excess lease and related costs associated with vacated office space and costs accrued for employee severance and related costs associated with work force reductions. We could incur additional restructuring charges if operating results require us to further reduce our work force. Additionally, we could incur additional restructuring charges or reverse prior charges in the event that the underlying assumptions used to develop our estimates of excess lease costs change, such as the timing and the amount of any sublease income. Depending on market conditions for office space and our ability to secure a suitable subtenant and sublease for the space, which to date we have not secured for all space, we may revise our estimates of the excess lease costs and the timing and amount of sublease income and, as a result, incur additional charges or credits to our restructuring and exit costs reserve as appropriate.

(9) Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation: We are involved in disputes and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. While we cannot predict the outcome of these disputes and proceedings, we believe, based upon a review with legal counsel, that none of these disputes or proceedings will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, we cannot be certain of the eventual outcome, and any adverse result in these or other matters that may arise from time to time may harm our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Indemnification of third party professional service providers: We provide certain indemnifications from time to time in the normal course of business to professional service providers and financial institutions, which may require us to make payments to an indemnified party in connection with certain transactions and agreements. Generally, the maximum obligation is not explicitly stated and cannot be reasonably estimated. The duration of the indemnifications vary based upon the specific activity underlying the indemnification and can be indefinite. We have not had a material indemnification claim, and we do not believe we will have a material claim in the future. As such, we have not recorded any liability for these indemnifications in our financial statements.

Indemnification of product users: We provide a limited indemnification to users of our products against any patent, copyright, or trade secret claims brought against them. The duration of the indemnifications vary based upon the life of the specific individual agreements. We have not had a material indemnification claim, and we do not believe we will have a material claim in the future. As such, we have not recorded any liability for these indemnifications in our financial statements.

Change of control agreements: We are a party to change of control employment agreements and term employment agreements with certain of our executive officers and key employees. Information regarding these agreements is contained in “Item 11. Executive Compensation – Employment Agreements,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004.

Termination of our Merger Agreement with Infor: MAPICS and Infor signed an Agreement and Plan of Merger on January 26, 2005 (the “Merger Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, in the event that the Merger Agreement is terminated by Infor for specific reasons or by us for specific reasons as described in the Merger Agreement, we will be obliged to pay Infor a $12 million Break Up Fee plus reasonable out of pocket expenses incurred up to a capped amount.

See “Item 1. Financial Statements” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 for further additional discussion regarding our commitments and contingencies.

(10) Operating Segments and Geographic Information

We have three operating segments for which we evaluate our business and for which we have discrete financial information available. These operating segments include 1) selling software to customers in the manufacturing environment, 2) providing support services to the customers that purchase our software, and 3) providing implementation and other consulting services to customers that purchase our software. In evaluating financial performance, we focus on income (loss) from operations, which we refer to as operating profit, as a measure of a segment’s profit or loss. Operating profit for this purpose is income before interest, taxes and allocation of certain corporate expenses. Operating profit is a relevant measure of segment profit or loss because it includes the revenue and related costs that apply to the individual segments. Interest, taxes and allocation of certain corporate expenses are not related specifically to the operating segments. We include other operating costs, including marketing, product development, and general and administrative expenses, in the presentation of reportable segment information because these expenses are not allocated separately to our operating segments. We do not utilize assets as a measure of a segment’s performance. We review assets at the enterprise level and thus do not include them in our segment disclosure.

11

Table of Contents

The following table includes interim financial information for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 related to our segments. The information presented below may not be indicative of results if the segments were independent organizations (in thousands).

Our principal administrative, marketing, product development and support operations are located in the United States. Areas of operation outside of the United States include EMEA, Asia Pacific and Latin America. In addition to the operating segments disclosed above, we regularly prepare and evaluate separate financial information for each of our principal geographic areas: 1) the Americas, 2) EMEA and 3) Asia Pacific. In evaluating financial performance, we focus on operating profit as a measure of a geographic area’s profit or loss. Operating profit for this purpose is income before interest, taxes and allocation of certain corporate expenses. We include our corporate division in the presentation of geographic area information because some of the income and expenses of this division are not allocated separately to the geographic areas. We have not allocated a portion of the product development costs of $3.9 million for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and $3.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2003 incurred in the United States to the other geographic areas, We also have not allocated administrative costs of $3.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and $4.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2003 incurred in the United States to the other geographic areas.

The following table includes interim financial information for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 related to our geographic areas. The information presented below may not be indicative of results if the geographic areas were independent organizations (in thousands).

(11) Recently Issued or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, which will become effective for interim or annual periods on or after June 15, 2005. This statement will become effective for our fourth quarter ending September 30, 2005. The statement requires companies to recognize, as an operating expense, the estimated fair value of share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and purchases under employee stock purchase plans. The expense will be recognized over the requisite service period based upon the fair value of the award as measured at the grant date. We will utilize the modified prospective application method to implement this statement. The modified prospective application method will require us to recognize as compensation expense the estimated fair value of newly awarded share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options and purchases under employee stock purchase plans. This method also requires us to recognize as compensation expense previously awarded outstanding share-based payments that are modified, repurchased or cancelled after the effective date of the statement. For outstanding awards for which the requisite service period has not been rendered as of the effective date of the statement, we will recognize compensation expense over the remaining service period using the compensation expense calculated for our pro forma disclosure under SFAS 123. At December 31, 2004, unamortized compensation expense as determined in accordance with SFAS 123 was $1.9 million.

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) was signed into law on October 22, 2004. The Act has several provisions that may impact our future income taxes. The Act provides a deduction for income from qualified domestic production activities; a two-year phase out of the existing extra-territorial income (ETI) exclusion for foreign sales; and, a special dividends received deduction for certain dividends received from controlled foreign corporations through September 2006.

12

Table of Contents

Under the guidance provided by SFAS 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, ‘Accounting for Income Taxes’ to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” the deduction will be treated as a “special deduction” as described in SFAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. As such, the special deduction has no effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities existing at the enactment date. The impact of this deduction will be reported in the period in which the deduction is claimed on our tax return. We have not completed our analysis of the expected impact of the deduction for qualified domestic production activities on our financial statements. This provision will not be effective until fiscal 2006. We do not anticipate that the phase out of the ETI exclusion will have a significant impact on our expected overall effective tax rate in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2006.

SFAS 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision with the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004”, provides guidance with regard to the effects of the “one-time” repatriation of funds from our foreign subsidiaries. The deduction is subject to a number of limitations and, as of today, uncertainty remains as to how to interpret numerous provisions of the Act. As such, we are not in a position to decide on whether, and to what extent, we might repatriate foreign earnings that have not yet been remitted back to the United States.

EITF Issue No. 04-10, “Determining Whether to Aggregate Operating Segments That Do Not Meet the Quantitative Thresholds” allows operating segments that do not meet the quantitative thresholds to be aggregated only if (1) the aggregation is consistent with the objective and basic principles of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” (2) the segments have similar economic characteristics and (3) the segments share a majority of the aggregation criteria (a)-(e) listed in paragraph 17 of SFAS No. 131. Prior to EITF Issue No. 04-10, segments could only be aggregated if they met the first two requirements and all of the aggregation criteria in (a)-(e) listed in paragraph 17 of SFAS No. 131. EITF Issue No. 04-10 was ratified on October 13, 2004, but has not yet been adopted. It is expected to be adopted during and be effective for our fiscal year ending September 30, 2005. We do not believe that EITF Issue No. 04-10 will have an impact on the way we currently present our segments in accordance with SFAS No. 131.

(12) Subsequent Event

On January 26, 2005 we signed a definitive agreement for us to be acquired in a purchase transaction by Infor Global Solutions Topco Ltd (“Infor”). Under the terms of the agreement, Infor has agreed to pay $12.75 per common share in cash to MAPICS shareholders. As of the date of the agreement, we had approximately 27.2 million shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis. The MAPICS Board of Directors has unanimously approved the agreement. The transaction is expected to be completed in the second calendar quarter of 2005, our third fiscal quarter, subject to standard conditions including regulatory clearance and MAPICS shareholder approval. In the event that the agreement is terminated by Infor for specific reasons or by us for specific reasons as described in the agreement, we will be obliged to pay Infor a $12 million Break Up Fee plus reasonable out of pocket expenses incurred up to a capped amount. On January 27, 2005 we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K that contains the related agreement and plan of merger. Please refer to this filing on Form 8-K for additional information regarding the agreement.

13

Table of Contents

ITEM 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes contained in “Item 1. Financial Statements” in Part I of this report and our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 filed with the SEC as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for that fiscal year. The following discussion and analysis (and other portions of this report) contains forward-looking statements relating to our future financial performance, business strategy, financing plans, ability to close the transaction with Infor, and other future events that involve uncertainties and risks. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated by these forward-looking statements as a result of many known and unknown factors that are beyond our ability to control or predict, including but not limited to those discussed in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors Affecting Future Performance” contained in the above-referenced Form 10-K and also discussed in our press release related to the Infor acquisition filed on Form 8-K on January 27, 2005. The cautionary statements made in those filings are applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this report. See also “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in “Item 1. Business” of that Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a developer of enterprise business application software solutions designed specifically for use by manufacturers and marketed throughout the world. Our goal is to deliver application software and consulting services that create value by providing a quick return on investment and improving bottom line financial results for our customers. Our offerings bring our customers the benefit of our proven expertise, knowledge, and understanding of the business issues that are unique to manufacturers.

We principally generate revenue from the licensing of software and the delivery of support and implementation services to mid-market discrete and batch-process manufacturing enterprises. Mid-market enterprises are generally those manufacturing operations that generate between $20 million and $1 billion in annual revenues. Our ability to maintain or grow our license or services revenue depends on a variety of factors, including the capital spending of the mid-market manufacturers that we serve. We have three operating segments for which we evaluate our business and for which we have discrete financial information available. These operating segments are “software” which includes software sales to customers in the manufacturing environment, “support” which includes maintenance and usage services to the customers that purchase our software and “implementation and consulting” which includes other professional services to customers that purchase our software.

On January 26, 2005 we signed a definitive agreement for us to be acquired in a purchase transaction by Infor Global Solutions Topco Ltd (“Infor”). Under the terms of the agreement, Infor has agreed to pay $12.75 per common share in cash to MAPICS shareholders. As of the date of the agreement, we had approximately 27.2 million shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis. The MAPICS Board of Directors has unanimously approved the agreement. The transaction is expected to be completed in the second calendar quarter of 2005, our third fiscal quarter, subject to standard conditions including regulatory clearance and MAPICS shareholder approval. In the event that the agreement is terminated by Infor for specific reasons or by us for specific reasons as described in the agreement, we will be obliged to pay Infor a $12 million Break Up Fee plus reasonable out of pocket expenses incurred up to a capped amount. On January 27, 2005 we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K that contains the related agreement and plan of merger. Please refer to this filing on Form 8-K for additional information regarding the agreement.

Summary

In the past year, there were indications of economic improvements in the U.S. and other geographic areas. We believe this improvement coupled with improvement in the overall manufacturing sector have begun to favorably impact our customers’ operations. We believe these factors have improved capital investment sentiment in several geographic areas. While signs of improvement in the global economy and general improvements in the manufacturing sector are positive developments, we believe some of our customers are still hesitant with respect to capital investment decisions. Furthermore, while economic growth is evident in the U.S. and Asia Pacific, there are now signs that this growth may be moderating. In addition, many European economies still face slow to no growth. This will continue to be a challenge to our operations as we derive a significant portion of our revenues from this region.

Our revenue and operating profits improved in the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003. The revenue increase was due principally to an increase in customer demand for our Syteline software solutions and improved maintenance renewal rates on the iSeries and Syteline software solutions in our North America and Latin America (the Americas) markets, our Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) markets and our Asia Pacific markets. We began to release translated versions of our Syteline 7 product within our EMEA and Asia Pacific distribution channels in the third quarter of fiscal 2004.

14

Table of Contents

The improvement in our operating profits was primarily due to our past restructuring efforts and improvements in our product mix. Our restructuring efforts reduced personnel and leased vacant office space over the past twelve months. This in turn lowered our direct and indirect cost of operations. Our revenue mix favored our Syteline 7 product, which has a higher operating margin than its predecessor version because of the reduced royalty expense associated with the Microsoft.net platform.

For the three months ended December 31, 2004, we funded our operations principally from cash flows from operations. Our operating cash flows showed significant improvement during the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003 due to improved operating results. Our operating cash flow for the three months ended December 31, 2003 was lower due to less favorable operating results than in the current period and the timing of payments of operating liabilities.

During the three months ended December 31, 2004, we incurred $0.3 million in total internal and external costs related to compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley requirements. These compliance costs may cause a significant increase in our general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2005. As a result of our compliance efforts in fiscal 2005 we believe our earnings per share will be negatively impacted by $0.03 to $0.04 per share, or approximately $0.8 million to $1.1 million based upon our weighted average shares outstanding (diluted) as of December 31, 2004.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2003

For the three months ended December 31, 2004, total revenue increased $5.3 million or 12.3% while total operating expenses increased $0.3 million or 0.8% from the year earlier quarter. This contributed to a 122% increase in net income to $5.1 million, or $0.19 per share (diluted), for the three months ended December 31, 2004 compared to net income of $2.3 million, or $0.09 per share (diluted), for the three months ended December 31, 2003

The following table presents our statements of operations data as a percentage of total revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

15

Table of Contents

Total Revenue

The following table shows license, support services and implementation and consulting services revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the percentage from the 2003 period to the 2004 period (in thousands):

Total revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2004 increased by $5.3 million as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003. The revenue increase was due principally to increased demand for our Syteline software solutions in both the Americas and in our EMEA and Asia Pacific markets. We began to release translated versions of our Syteline 7 product within our EMEA and Asia Pacific distribution channels in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. Total Syteline solutions license and support service revenue increased $4.6 million or 32% to $19.1 million in the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with $14.5 million in the same period last year. Total iSeries solutions and other product license and support service revenue increased $0.7 million or 3% to $25.1 million in the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with $24.4 million in the same period last year.

License Revenue

Total license revenue increased $2.8 million during the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2003. The increase is principally due to an increase of $5.1 million in license volume offset by a $2.2 million decrease in net recognized deferred license revenue related to our MAPICS ERP for iSeries products. The increase in license volume is comprised of a $3.1 million increase for our Syteline solution and a $2.0 million increase for our iSeries solution and other products. The $3.1 million of Syteline license volume is under perpetual licenses pursuant to which revenue is recognized in the current period. The $2.0 million of iSeries license volume is under annual renewable term licenses pursuant to which revenue is deferred and recognized ratably over the next twelve months.

As such, the $2.8 million increase in license revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2004 consists of the $3.1 million increase in Syteline license revenue offset by a decrease of $0.3 million in iSeries and other product license revenue. The decrease in iSeries and other product license revenue is due to lower license volume in the twelve months prior to December 31, 2004 as opposed to the twelve months prior to December 31, 2003. Because we have experienced increases in iSeries license volume in the past two quarters, we do not believe the revenue declines constitute a trend for the iSeries product. As this increased iSeries license volume is recognized as revenue over the next twelve months, iSeries license revenue should improve.

The increase in license volume for our Syteline solution is due to increased demand for these products in the Americas and greater penetration of the Syteline 7 product in EMEA and Asia Pacific. We released translated versions of the Syteline 7 product into our distribution channels serving these geographic areas in June 2004. We believe the Syteline 7 product is now gaining acceptance by our customers in these regions and has started to generate demand and increased license volume. The increase in license volume for the iSeries solution and other products is due to increased sales of add-on products to existing customers and a few larger new implementations. The decrease in net deferred license revenue recognized is from our MAPICS ERP for iSeries license agreements, which are typically deferred and amortized ratably over a twelve-month period. This $2.2 million decrease in net recognized deferred license revenue is primarily attributable to higher license volume for our Syteline solutions in the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003. Our Syteline solutions are licensed under perpetual licenses pursuant to which revenue is recognized in the current period rather than deferred and recognized ratably in future periods. The increase in Syteline solution license volume was explained in the preceding paragraphs.

For the three months ended December 31, 2004, we executed 352 transactions with an average contract price of $41,000. This compares to 262 transactions in the three months ended December 31, 2003 with an average contract price of $35,000. The increase in

16

Table of Contents

the number of transactions for the three months ended December 31, 2004 is principally due to the increase in licensing transactions with our customers for the Syteline solutions, particularly the Syteline 7 product as our customers continue to transition to the this Mircosoft.net platform product worldwide. The total number of iSeries solutions and other product transactions in the three months ended December 31, 2004 was consistent with the three months ended December 31, 2003. The increase in average contract price was due to the increase in iSeries add-on transactions, which have a higher average contract price.

Support Service Revenue

Our support services revenue consists of annual license fees and annual support fees, which are typically paid in advance. The annual fees entitle the customer to receive twelve months of support services, as available. We record these annual fees as services revenue and recognize this revenue ratably over the term of the agreement. Support services revenue increased by $2.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003 due to a $1.1 million increase in support service revenue for the iSeries solution and other products and a $1.4 million increase in Syteline solutions support services revenue. The increase in iSeries support services revenue is principally due to increased renewal rates in the twelve months preceding December 31, 2004 versus the twelve months preceding December 31, 2003 for existing support customers and the addition of new support customers derived from new licensing transactions over the past twelve months. The increase in Syteline support service revenue is principally due to the growth in new licensing transactions over the past twelve months and an increase in the maintenance renewal rates in the past twelve months.

Implementation and Consulting Services

Our implementation and consulting services revenue is generated by our professional services organization, which may be hired by our customers on a contract basis to provide consulting and implementation services relating to our products and the products of our solution partners. Implementation and consulting service revenue of $4.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2004 was consistent with implementation and consulting service revenue of $4.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2003.

Geographic Revenue Information

Our operations are conducted principally in (1) the Americas, (2) EMEA, and (3) Asia Pacific. The following table shows the percentage of software license revenue, support services revenue, implementation and consulting services revenue and total revenue contributed by each of our primary geographic areas for the three months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

For the three months ended December 31, 2004, total revenue by geographic area as a percentage of total revenue increased for both EMEA and Asia Pacific and decreased for the Americas as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003. While the Americas grew the dollar amount of revenue more than EMEA and Asia Pacific, EMEA and Asia Pacific revenue grew at a greater percentage of total revenue than the Americas in the three months ended December 31, 2004. For the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003, total revenue for the Americas grew by $3.0 million or 9%, total revenue for EMEA grew by $1.8 million or 23% and total revenue for Asia Pacific grew by $0.5 million or 19%. The higher percentage growth rates in EMEA and Asia Pacific are in part due to the release of translated versions of Syteline 7 in these geographic areas. Translated versions of Syteline 7 were not generally available until the quarter ended June 30, 2004. We believe that a contributing factor to the increase in Asia Pacific revenue is the continued economic growth in the region, which is contributing to and being fueled by the continuing trend of increased multinational manufacturing presence and outsourcing to this region. Another factor contributing to the changes in percentage of total revenues are currency fluctuations. The Euro, British Pound Sterling, Japanese Yen and Australian Dollar were approximately 7.7%, 7.5%, 4.4% and 3.8% higher against the U.S. Dollar at December 31, 2004 than at December 31, 2003.

For the three months ended December 31, 2004, license revenue by geographic area as a percentage of total license revenue increased for both EMEA and Asia Pacific and decreased for the Americas as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003. While the Americas grew the dollar amount of license revenue more than EMEA and Asia Pacific, EMEA and Asia Pacific license revenue grew at a greater percentage of total license revenue than the Americas in the three months ended December 31, 2004.

17

Table of Contents

For the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003, license revenue for the Americas grew by $1.7 million or 20%, license revenue for EMEA grew by $0.6 million or 27% and license revenue for Asia Pacific grew by $0.5 million or 64%.

For the three months ended December 31, 2004, support services revenue by geographic area as a percentage of total support services revenue increased for EMEA, remained consistent for Asia Pacific and decreased for the Americas as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003. While the Americas grew the dollar amount of support services revenue more than EMEA, EMEA support services revenue grew at a higher percentage of total support services revenue than the Americas in the three months ended December 31, 2004. For the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003, support services revenue for the Americas grew by $1.2 million or 6%, support services revenue for EMEA grew by $1.0 million or 22% and support services revenue for Asia Pacific grew by $0.2 million or 13%.

For the three months ended December 31, 2004, implementation and consulting services revenue by geographic area as a percentage of total implementation and consulting services revenue increased for EMEA, remained consistent for the Americas and declined for Asia Pacific as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003. EMEA grew the dollar amount of implementation and consulting services revenue more than the Americas, and Asia Pacific implementation and consulting services revenue declined slightly for the three months ended December 31 2004. For the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared with the three months ended December 31, 2003, implementation and consulting services revenues for the Americas grew less than $0.1 million, implementation and consulting services revenue for EMEA grew $0.2 million or 19% and implementation and consulting services revenue for Asia Pacific declined by $0.2 million or 28%. The first quarter of each fiscal year is typically slow for our implementation and consulting services segment, as many customers do not undertake new implementation and consulting services projects because of the holidays. Revenue performance for this segment in this quarter of the fiscal year should not be construed as a trend and is consistent with prior periods. Additional information about our operations in these geographic areas is presented in note (10) of the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements in this report.

Operating Expenses - Cost of Revenue

The following table shows cost of license revenue from software sales, cost of support service revenue and cost of implementation and consulting service revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2004 as compared to the three months ended December 31, 2003 (in thousands):