Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Fiscal Quarter Ended October 31, 2004

Commission File Number 0-12788

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

ONE CONVENIENCE BOULEVARD, ANKENY, IOWA

(Address of principal executive offices)

50021

(Zip Code)

(515) 965-6100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NONE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)    YES  x    NO  ¨

As of December 2, 2004, the registrant had outstanding 50,131,862 shares of Common Stock, no par value.

Table of Contents

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.

INDEX

1

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements.

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in Thousands)

See notes to unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(Continued)

(Dollars in Thousands)

See notes to unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in Thousands, except per share amounts)

See notes to unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

5

Table of Contents

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

(Continued)

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION

See notes to unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

7

Table of Contents

8

Table of Contents

The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for its incentive stock option plan; accordingly, the financial statements recognize no compensation cost for stock options. Had the Company determined compensation cost of its stock options based on the fair value at the grant date under SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts shown in the following table:

9

Table of Contents

The weighted average fair value of the stock options granted during the six months ended October 31, 2004 and 2003 was $4.36 and $3.98 per share, respectively, on the date of grant. Fair value was calculated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 - expected dividend yield of 0.95%, risk-free interest rate of 3.8%, estimated volatility of 24%, and an expected life of 5.8 years; for the quarter ended July 31, 2003 - expected dividend yield of 0.89%, risk-free interest rate of 3.9%, estimated volatility of 24%, and an expected life of 5.8 years. There were no stock options granted during the second quarter of 2004 and 2003. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of options granted is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting periods.

10

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Dollars in Thousands).

Overview

Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (“Casey’s”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (Casey’s, together with its subsidiaries, are referred to herein as the “Company”), operate convenience stores under the name “Casey’s General Store” in nine Midwestern states, primarily Iowa, Missouri and Illinois. All stores offer gasoline for sale on a self-serve basis and carry a broad selection of food (including freshly prepared foods such as pizza, donuts and sandwiches), beverages, tobacco products, health and beauty aids, automotive products and other non-food items. On October 31, 2004, there were a total of 1,366 Casey’s General Stores in operation, of which 1,332 were owned by the Company and 34 stores were operated by franchisees. A typical store is generally not profitable for its first year of operation due to start-up costs and will usually attain representative levels of sales and profits during its third year of operation.

The Company derives its revenue primarily from the retail sale of gasoline and the products offered in Company stores. The Company also generates a small amount of its revenues from the Company’s franchisees and from the wholesale sale of certain grocery and general merchandise items and gasoline to franchised stores.

Approximately 62% of all Casey’s General Stores are located in areas with populations of fewer than 5,000 persons, while approximately 11% of all stores are located in communities with populations exceeding 20,000 persons. The Company operates a central warehouse, the Casey’s Distribution Center, adjacent to its Corporate Headquarters facility in Ankeny, Iowa, through which it supplies grocery and general merchandise items to Company and franchised stores.

11

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended October 31, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended October 31, 2003 (Dollars and Amounts in Thousands)

Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 increased by $105,924 (17.3%) over the comparable period in fiscal 2004. Retail gasoline sales increased by $89,027 (23.4%) as the number of gallons sold increased by 8,588 (3.4%) while the average retail price per gallon increased 19.3%. During this same period, retail sales of grocery and general merchandise and prepared foods increased by $18,224 (8.2%) due to the addition of 31 new Company Stores and a greater number of stores in operation for at least three years.

Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales was 83.8% for the second quarter of fiscal 2005, compared to 80.8% for the comparable period in the prior year. The gross profit margins on retail gasoline sales decreased (to 5.4%) during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 from the second quarter of the prior year (7.9%). The gross profit margin per gallon also decreased (to $.0969) in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 from the comparable period in the prior year ($.1191) due to the raising price of wholesale gasoline. The gross margin on retail sales of grocery and general merchandise decreased (to 30.8%) from the comparable period in the prior year (32.3%) due primarily to the reduction in vendor rebates. The gross margin on prepared food and fountain decreased (to 60.4%) from the comparable period in the prior year (62.8%) due primarily to higher wholesale cheese prices.

12

Table of Contents

Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales were 11.7% for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to 12.7% for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales was caused primarily by a increase in the average retail price per gallon of gasoline sold. Operating expenses increased 8.2% in the second quarter of 2005 from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to a 32% increase in bank fees resulting from customers’ greater use of credit cards to purchase more expensive gasoline, an increase in the loss on sale of property and equipment of $1,002, and the larger number of corporate stores.

Net income decreased by $4,764 (30.2%). The decrease in net income was attributable primarily to the decrease in the gross profit margins on retail gasoline sales and inside sales.

Six Months Ended October 31, 2004 Compared to Six Months Ended October 31, 2003 (Dollars and Amounts in Thousands)

Net sales for the first six months of fiscal 2005 increased by $230,650 (18.9%) over the comparable period in fiscal 2004. Retail gasoline sales increased by $202,481 (27.1%) as the number of gallons sold increased by 11,707 (2.3%) and the average retail price per gallon increased 24.2%. During this same period, retail sales of grocery and general merchandise and prepared foods increased by $31,212 (6.8%) due to the addition of 31 new Company stores and a greater number of stores in operation for at least three years.

13

Table of Contents

Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales was 83.5% for the first six months of fiscal 2005 compared to 81.0% for the comparable period in the prior year. This result occurred because the gross profit margins on retail gasoline sales decreased (to 5.9%) during the first six months of fiscal 2005 from the comparable period in the prior year (7.4%). The gross profit margin per gallon also decreased in the first six months of fiscal 2005 (to $.1076) from the comparable period in the prior year ($.1086). The gross profits on retail sales of grocery and general merchandise decreased (to 37.2%) from the comparable period in the prior year (38.1%) due primarily to the decrease in the prepared food margin (to 59.6%) from the comparable period in the prior year (61.8%) and a reduction in vendor rebates. The decrease in the prepared food margin was caused primarily by higher wholesale cheese prices.

Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales were 11.6% for the first six months of fiscal 2005 compared to 12.7% for the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales was caused primarily by a increase in the average retail price per gallon of gasoline sold. Operating expenses increased 8.2% in the first six months of 2005 from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to a 29.3% increase in bank fees resulting from customers’ greater use of credit cards to purchase more expensive gasoline, an increase in the loss on sale of property and equipment of $1,240, and the larger number of corporate stores.

Net income decreased by $2,842 (9.5%). The decrease in net income was attributable primarily to the decrease in the gross profit margins on inside sales and retail gasoline sales.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those accounting policies that management believes are important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, subjective judgments, often because of the need to estimate the effects of inherently uncertain factors.

Inventory. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Gasoline inventories are valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Merchandise inventories are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, applied to inventory values determined by the retail inventory method (RIM) for store inventories and the FIFO method for warehouse inventories. RIM is an averaging method widely used in the retail industry because of its practicality.

14

Table of Contents

Under RIM, inventory valuations are at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a cost-to-retail ratio to sales. Inherent in the RIM calculations are certain management judgments and estimates, which could affect the ending inventory valuation at cost and the resulting gross margins.

Long-lived Assets. The Company periodically monitors under-performing stores for an indication that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, including goodwill where applicable, an impairment loss is recognized. Impairment is based on the estimated fair value of the asset. Fair value is based on management’s estimate of the amount that could be realized from the sale of assets in a current transaction between willing parties. The estimate is derived from professional appraisals, offers, actual sale or disposition of assets subsequent to period end, and other indications of asset value. In determining whether an asset is impaired, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets, which for the Company is generally on a store-by-store basis.

Self-insurance. The Company is primarily self-insured for workers’ compensation, general liability, and automobile claims. The self-insurance claim liability is determined actuarially based on claims filed and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. Actuarial projections of the losses are employed due to the high degree of variability in the liability estimates. Some factors affecting the uncertainty of claims include the time frame of development, settlement patterns, litigation and adjudication direction, and medical treatment and cost trends. The liability is not discounted.

Liquidity and Capital Resources (Dollars in Thousands)

Due to the nature of the Company’s business, most sales are for cash, and cash provided by operations is the Company’s primary source of liquidity. The Company finances its inventory purchases primarily from normal trade credit aided by the relatively rapid turnover of inventory. This turnover allows the Company to conduct its operations without large amounts of cash and working capital. As of October 31, 2004, the Company’s ratio of current assets to current liabilities was .98 to 1. The ratio at October 31, 2003 and April 30, 2004 was 1.04 to 1 and 1.01 to 1, respectively. Management believes that the Company’s current bank line of credit of $35,000 ($0 outstanding at October 31, 2004), together with cash flow from operations, will be sufficient to satisfy the working capital needs of its business.

15

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by operations increased $12,666 (20.7%) in the six months ended October 31, 2004 from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily as a result of a large increase in accounts payable, a smaller increase in inventories and an increase in accrued expenses. Cash used in investing in the three months ended October 31, 2004 decreased due to the reduction in the proceeds from sale of property and equipment. Cash used in financing increased, primarily as a result of the increased payments of long-term debt and an increase in the payment of cash dividends.

Capital expenditures represent the single largest use of Company funds. Management believes that by reinvesting in Company stores, the Company will be better able to respond to competitive challenges and increase operating efficiencies. During the first six months of fiscal 2005, the Company expended $40,702 for property and equipment, primarily for the construction, acquisition and remodeling of Company stores, compared to $40,854 for the comparable period in the prior year. The Company anticipates expending approximately $100,000 in fiscal 2005 for construction, acquisition and remodeling of Company stores, primarily from existing cash and funds generated by operations.

As of October 31, 2004, the Company had long-term debt of $127,473, consisting of $30,000 in principal amount of 7.38% Senior Notes, $36,000 in principal amount of Senior Notes, Series A through Series F, with interest rates ranging from 6.18% to 7.23%, $57,142 in principal amount of 7.89% Senior Notes, Series A, $2,167 of mortgage notes payable, and $2,164 of capital lease obligations.

To date, the Company has funded capital expenditures primarily from the proceeds of the sale of Common Stock, issuance of 6-1/4% Convertible Subordinated Debentures (which were converted into shares of Common Stock in 1994), the above-described Senior Notes, a mortgage note, and through funds generated from operations. Future capital needs required to finance operations, improvements and the anticipated growth in the number of Company stores are expected to be met from cash generated by operations, the bank line of credit, and additional long-term debt or other securities as circumstances may dictate, and are not expected to adversely affect liquidity.

Cautionary Statements (Dollars in Thousands)

The foregoing Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains various “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the

16

Table of Contents

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements represent the Company’s expectations or beliefs concerning future events, including (i) any statements regarding future sales and gross profit percentages, (ii) any statements regarding the continuation of historical trends and (iii) any statements regarding the sufficiency of the Company’s cash balances and cash generated from operations and financing activities for the Company’s future liquidity and capital resource needs. The Company cautions that these statements are further qualified by important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitations, the following factors described more completely in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004:

Competition. The Company’s business is highly competitive, and marked by ease of entry and constant change in terms of the numbers and type of retailers offering the products and services found in Company stores. Many of the food (including prepared foods) and non-food items similar or identical to those sold by the Company are generally available from a variety of competitors in the communities served by Company stores, and the Company competes with other convenience store chains, gasoline stations, supermarkets, drug stores, discount stores, club stores, mass merchants and “fast-food” outlets (with respect to the sale of prepared foods). Sales of such non-gasoline items (particularly prepared food items) have contributed substantially to the Company’s gross profits from retail sales in recent years. Gasoline sales are also intensely competitive. The Company competes with both independent and national brand gasoline stations in the sale of gasoline, other convenience store chains and several non-traditional gasoline retailers such as supermarkets in specific markets. Some of these other gasoline retailers may have access to more favorable arrangements for gasoline supply then do the Company or the firms that supply its stores. Some of the Company’s competitors have greater financial, marketing and other resources than the Company, and, as a result, may be able to respond better to changes in the economy and new opportunities within the industry.

Gasoline operations. Gasoline sales are an important part of the Company’s sales and earnings, and retail gasoline profit margins have a substantial impact on the Company’s net income. Profit margins on gasoline sales can be adversely affected by factors beyond the control of the Company, including the supply of gasoline available in the retail gasoline market, uncertainty or volatility in the wholesale gasoline market, increases in wholesale gasoline costs generally during a period and price competition from other gasoline marketers. The market for crude oil and domestic wholesale petroleum products is marked by significant volatility, and is affected by general political conditions and instability in oil producing regions such as the Middle East and

17

Table of Contents

Venezuela. The volatility of the wholesale gasoline market makes it extremely difficult to predict the impact of future wholesale cost fluctuation on the Company’s operating results and financial conditions. These factors could materially impact the Company’s gasoline gallon volume, gasoline gross profit and overall customer traffic levels at Company stores. Any substantial decrease in profit margins on gasoline sales or in the number of gallons sold by Company stores could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s earnings.

The Company purchases its gasoline from a variety of independent national and regional petroleum distributors. Although in recent years the Company’s suppliers have not experienced any difficulties in obtaining sufficient amounts of gasoline to meet the Company’s needs, unanticipated national and international events could result in a reduction of gasoline supplies available for distribution to the Company. Any substantial curtailment in gasoline supplied to the Company could adversely affect the Company by reducing its gasoline sales. Further, management believes that a significant amount of the Company’s business results from the patronage of customers primarily desiring to purchase gasoline and, accordingly, reduced gasoline supplies could adversely affect the sale of non-gasoline items. Such factors could have a material adverse impact upon the Company’s earnings and operations.

Tobacco Products. Sales of tobacco products represent a significant portion of the Company’s revenues. Significant increases in wholesale cigarette costs and tax increases on tobacco products, as well as national and local campaigns to discourage smoking in the United States, could have an adverse affect on the demand for cigarettes sold by Company stores. The Company attempts to pass price increases onto its customers, but competitive pressures in specific markets may prevent it from doing so. These factors could materially impact the retail price of cigarettes, the volume of cigarettes sold by Company stores and overall customer traffic.

Environmental Compliance Costs. The United States Environmental Protection Agency and several states, including Iowa, have established requirements for owners and operators of underground gasoline storage tanks (USTs) with regard to (i) maintenance of leak detection, corrosion protection and overfill/spill protection systems; (ii) upgrade of existing tanks; (iii) actions required in the event of a detected leak; (iv) prevention of leakage through tank closings; and (v) required gasoline inventory recordkeeping. Since 1984, new Company stores have been equipped with non-corroding fiberglass USTs. The Company currently has 2,679 USTs, of which 2,369 are fiberglass and 310 are steel, including many with double-wall construction, over-fill protection and electronic tank monitoring, and the Company has an active inspection program with respect to its USTs.

18

Table of Contents

Management believes that its existing gasoline procedures and planned capital expenditures will continue to keep the Company in substantial compliance with all current federal and state UST regulations.

Several of the states in which the Company does business have trust fund programs with provisions for sharing or reimbursing corrective action or remediation costs incurred by UST owners, including the Company. The extent of available coverage or reimbursement under such programs for costs incurred by the Company is not fully known at this time. In each of the years ended April 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company spent approximately $1,827 and $1,138, respectively, for assessments and remediation. During the six months ended October 31, 2004, the Company expended approximately $720 for such purposes. Substantially all of these expenditures have been submitted for reimbursement from state-sponsored trust fund programs and as of October 31, 2004, approximately $8,000 has been received from such programs since their inception. Such amounts are typically subject to statutory provisions requiring repayment of the reimbursed funds for non-compliance with upgrade provisions or other applicable laws. The Company has an accrued liability at October 31, 2004 of approximately $200 for estimated expenses related to anticipated corrective actions or remediation efforts, including relevant legal and consulting costs. Management believes the Company has no material joint and several environmental liability with other parties.

Although the Company regularly accrues expenses for the estimated costs related to its future corrective action or remediation efforts, there can be no assurance that such accrued amounts will be sufficient to pay such costs, or that the Company has identified all environmental liabilities at all of its current store locations. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will not incur substantial expenditures in the future for remediation of contamination or related claims that have not been discovered or asserted with respect to existing store locations or locations that the Company may acquire in the future, or that the Company will not be subject to any claims for reimbursement of funds disbursed to the Company under the various state programs or that additional regulations, or amendments to existing regulations, will not require additional expenditures beyond those presently anticipated.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to its investment portfolio and long-term debt obligations. The Company

19

Table of Contents

places its investments with high quality credit issuers and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. As stated in its policy, the Company’s first priority is to reduce the risk of principal loss. Consequently, the Company seeks to preserve its invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. The Company mitigates default risk by investing in only high quality credit securities that it believes to be low risk and by positioning its portfolio to respond appropriately to a significant reduction in a credit rating of any investment issuer or guarantor. The portfolio includes only marketable securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity. The Company believes that an immediate 100 basis point move in interest rates affecting the Company’s floating and fixed rate financial instruments as of October 31, 2004 would have an immaterial effect on the Company’s pretax earnings.

The Company uses a variety of derivative instruments such as options and futures to hedge against the volatility of gasoline cost. The Company is at risk for possible changes in the market value for these derivative instruments. It is anticipated that such risk would be mitigated by price changes in the underlying hedged items. Market risks associated with all of the Company’s derivative contracts are reviewed regularly by management.

At October 31, 2004, the Company had accumulated net hedging gains before income taxes of $20 on its open options and future contracts. The amount represented their fair value as determined using various indices and dealer quotes. The Company had net hedging losses before income taxes of $539 at October 31, 2004 on closed options and futures contracts related to hedged transactions occurring in the six months. These derivative contracts are not linked to specific assets or liabilities on the balance sheet or to forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge relationship and therefore do not qualify for hedge accounting. They are carried at fair value with any changes in fair value recorded as part of cost of goods sold in the income statement.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 240.13a-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s current disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

20

Table of Contents

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

The Company from time to time is a party to legal proceedings arising from the conduct of its business operations, including proceedings relating to personal injury and employment claims, environmental remediation or contamination, disputes under franchise agreements and claims by state and federal regulatory authorities relating to the sale of products pursuant to state or federal licenses or permits. Management does not believe that the potential liability of the Company with respect to such proceedings pending as of the date of this Form 10-Q is material in the aggregate.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

At the Annual Meeting of shareholders held on September 17, 2004, nine directors were elected for a term of one year. Each of the nominees so elected previously has served as a director of the Company.

The votes cast or withheld for each nominee were as follows:

21

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a) The following exhibits are filed with this Report or, if so indicated, incorporated by reference:

22

Table of Contents

(b) Reports on Form 8-K. On September 1, 2004 and September 2, 2004, the Company filed Form 8-K reports with respect to the press release and transcript of the related conference call concerning the fiscal 2004 first quarter financial results. On August 16, 2004, September 15, 2004 and October 14, 2004, the Company filed Form 8-K reports with respect to the monthly same-store sales results for July, August and September 2004, respectively.

23

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

24

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are filed herewith:

25