Back to GetFilings.com

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004

or

For the transition period from                             to                        

Commission file number 1-31557

Wachovia Preferred Funding Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

1620 East Roseville Parkway

Roseville, California 95661

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(877) 867-7378

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ¨  No  x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.  Yes  ¨  No  ¨

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of October 31, 2004, there were 99,999,900 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Forward Looking Statements

Wachovia Preferred Funding Corp. (“Wachovia Funding”) may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in Wachovia Funding’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (including its Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the Exhibits hereto and thereto), in its reports to stockholders and in other Wachovia Funding communications, which are made in good faith by Wachovia Funding pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements with respect to Wachovia Funding’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, financial condition, results of operations, future performance and business of Wachovia Funding, including without limitation, (i) statements regarding certain of Wachovia Funding’s goals and expectations with respect to earnings, earnings per share, revenue, expenses and the growth rate in such items, as well as other measures of economic performance, including statements relating to estimates of credit quality trends, and (ii) statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may”, “could”, “should”, “would”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “projects”, “outlook” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on various factors (many of which are beyond Wachovia Funding’s control). The following factors, among others, could cause Wachovia Funding’s financial performance to differ materially from that expressed in such forward-looking statements:

Wachovia Funding cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive. Wachovia Funding does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of Wachovia Funding.

“Wachovia Funding”, “we”, “our” and “us” refer to Wachovia Preferred Funding Corp. “Wachovia Preferred Holding” refers to Wachovia Preferred Funding Holding Corp., the “Bank” refers to Wachovia Bank, National Association, and “Wachovia” refers to Wachovia Corporation.

2

PART I.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.    Financial Statements.

WACHOVIA PREFERRED FUNDING CORP.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003

See accompanying note to consolidated financial statements.

3

WACHOVIA PREFERRED FUNDING CORP.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

See accompanying note to consolidated financial statements.

4

WACHOVIA PREFERRED FUNDING CORP.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

See accompanying note to consolidated financial statements.

5

WACHOVIA PREFERRED FUNDING CORP.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

See accompanying note to consolidated financial statements.

6

WACHOVIA PREFERRED FUNDING CORP.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTE TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

September 30, 2004 and 2003, and December 31, 2003

NOTE 1:     CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Wachovia Preferred Funding Corp. and its subsidiaries are subsidiaries of Wachovia Bank, National Association, and its subsidiaries, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wachovia Corporation.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Wachovia Funding, include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements for all periods presented. The financial position and result of operations as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected in the future. Please refer to Wachovia Funding’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information related to Wachovia Funding’s audited consolidated financial statements for the three years ended December 31, 2003, including the related notes to consolidated financial statements.

Certain amounts in 2003 were reclassified to conform with the presentation in 2004. These reclassifications had no effect on Wachovia Funding’s previously reported consolidated financial position or results of operations.

7

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Please refer to our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information related to our accounting policies and risk governance and administration.

For the tax year ending December 31, 2004, we expect to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”), and we intend to comply with the relevant provisions of the Internal Revenue Code to be taxed as a REIT. These provisions for qualifying as a REIT for federal income tax purposes are complex, involving many requirements, including among others, distributing the majority of our earnings to shareholders and satisfying certain asset, income and stock ownership tests. To the extent we meet those provisions, with the exception of the income of our taxable REIT subsidiary, Wachovia Preferred Realty, LLC (“WPR”), we will not be subject to federal income tax on net income. We currently believe that we continue to satisfy each of these requirements and therefore continue to qualify as a REIT. We continue to monitor each of these complex tests.

In the event we do not continue to qualify as a REIT, we believe there should be minimal adverse effect of that characterization to us or to our shareholders:

Please refer to our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on WPR.

Critical Accounting Policies

In order to understand our financial position and results of operations, it is important to understand our more significant accounting policies and the extent to which we use judgment and estimates in applying those policies. Our accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and they conform to general practices within the applicable industries. The application of certain of these principles involves a significant amount of judgment and the use of estimates based on assumptions that involve significant uncertainty at the time of evaluation. We have identified the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments as being particularly sensitive in terms of judgments and the extent to which estimates are used.

Allowance for Loan Losses and Reserve for Unfunded Lending Commitments

The allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments (collectively, the “allowance for credit losses”) are maintained at levels we believe are adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio and unfunded lending commitments as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. We believe we have developed appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and reserve for unfunded lending commitments that reflect our careful assessment of credit risk considering all information available to us. This assessment includes the monitoring of qualitative and quantitative trends including changes in the levels of past due, criticized and nonperforming

8

loans. In developing this assessment, we must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown. Depending on changes in circumstances, future assessments of credit risk may yield materially different results, which may require an increase or a decrease in the allowance for credit losses.

As a subsidiary of Wachovia, our loans are subject to the same analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses as loans maintained in all of Wachovia’s subsidiaries including the Bank. Wachovia employs a variety of modeling and estimation tools in developing the appropriate allowance for loans specific to our portfolio.

In the second quarter of 2004, Wachovia refined the allowance for loan losses model to better align its methodology with the current framework for analyzing credit risk. This change in methodology did not significantly change the level of our allowance or our view as to its adequacy. The following provides a description of Wachovia’s methodology.

Our refined model for the allowance for loan losses has four components: Formula-based components for both the commercial and consumer portfolios, each of which include an adjustment for historical loss variability, a reserve for impaired commercial loans and an unallocated component. Our refined methodology enables us to effectively align the allowance with the different types of inherent risk in our loan portfolio. Separate allowance ranges for the commercial and consumer components permit us to specifically address the current trends and events affecting the risk in the respective portfolios.

For commercial loans, the formula-based component of the allowance for loan losses is based on statistical estimates of the average losses observed for commercial loans, that we have classified in accordance to their credit grade. Average losses are computed using the annualized historical rate at which loans in each grade have defaulted (default rates) and the historical average losses realized for defaulted loans (“loss-given-default” or LGD). Default rates have been developed by analyzing seven years of our default experience and over 20 years of comparable external data. Default rates, which are validated annually, are estimates derived from long-term averages and are not conditioned on short-term economic or environmental factors. LGD rates have also been developed using seven years of internal data and industry data.

For consumer loans, the formula-based component of the allowance for loan losses is based on loss rates for specific groups of similar loans in each product category. The loss rates are based on historical loss data, historical delinquency patterns, vintage analyses, stress tests and credit score-based forecasting methods.

For both commercial and consumer loans, the formula-based loss components include additional amounts to establish reasonable ranges that consider observed historical variability in losses. Factors we may consider in setting these amounts include, but are not limited to, industry-specific data, portfolio-specific risks or concentrations, and macroeconomic conditions. In an economic downturn, for example, the timing and magnitude of credit risk deterioration in certain industries may be faster and more severe than in others. In addition, adverse trends in macroeconomic factors such as unemployment rates, income growth, inflation and political events are likely to affect some borrowers’ ability to meet their loan payments. Including these historical variability components in our model enables us to capture probable incurred losses that are not yet evident in current default grades, delinquencies or other credit risk measurement tools.

At September 30, 2004, the formula-based component of the allowance was $86.7 million for commercial loans and $16.5 million for consumer loans.

When applicable, specific reserves are established within the allowance for loan losses for large impaired loans. We define impaired loans as commercial loans on nonaccrual status. Impaired loans with a minimum total exposure of $10.0 million are individually reviewed. An allowance for each individually reviewed loan is based on the difference between the loan’s carrying amount and the loan’s estimated fair value. Fair value is estimated using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s

9

effective interest rate, or the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. No other allowance is provided on impaired loans that are individually reviewed. At September 30, 2004, we did not have any impaired loans over $10.0 million.

The allowance for loan losses is supplemented, under certain conditions, with an unallocated component. This component reflects in part the inherent uncertainty of estimates and is designed as a final tool in fully capturing probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The amount of this component and its relationship to the total allowance for loan losses may change from one period to another. We anticipate that the unallocated component of the allowance will generally not exceed 5 percent of the total allowance.

In June 2004, we reclassified our reserve for unfunded commercial lending commitments from the allowance for loan losses to other liabilities. The modeling process used in the determination of the reserve for unfunded lending commitments is consistent with the process described above for the commercial portion of the allowance for loan losses, also including as a key factor the historical average rate at which unfunded exposures have been funded at time of default. At September 30, 2004, the reserve for unfunded lending commitments was $881,000.

The factors supporting the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded commitments as described above does not diminish the fact that the entire allowance for credit losses is available to absorb all credit losses in the loan portfolio. Our principal focus, therefore, is on the adequacy of the total allowance for credit losses.

Results of Operations

For purposes of this discussion, the term “loans” includes loans and loan participation interests, the term “residential loans” includes home equity loans and residential mortgages and the term “commercial loans” includes commercial and commercial real estate loans. See Table 1 following “Accounting and Regulatory Matters” for certain performance and dividend payout ratios for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.

Although we have the authority to acquire interests in an unlimited number of mortgage and other assets from unaffiliated third parties, the majority of our interests in mortgage and other assets have been acquired from the Bank or an affiliate pursuant to loan participation agreements between the Bank or an affiliate and us. Our remaining assets were acquired directly from the Bank. The Bank either originated the mortgage assets, or purchased them from other financial institutions or acquired them as part of the acquisition of other financial institutions.

2004 to 2003 Nine Month Comparison

Net income available to common stockholders.    We earned net income available to common stockholders of $130.3 million in the first nine months of 2004 and $135.0 million in the first nine months of 2003. Relatively flat net interest income, lower gains on interest rate swaps and higher management fee expense led to the decrease in the first nine months of 2004. These were partially offset by a lower provision for credit losses.

Interest Income.    Interest income decreased $908,000 from the first nine months of 2003 to $287.9 million in the first nine months of 2004. Interest on commercial loans decreased to $187.5 million reflecting lower loan balances from pay-downs. Interest on residential loans increased $48.1 million to $91.8 million as a result of our reinvesting cash obtained from pay-downs of commercial loans into residential loans. Interest income on cash invested in overnight eurodollar deposit investments increased $316,000, or 4%, to $8.6 million in the first nine months of 2004 as a result of higher average overnight eurodollar deposit investments balances.

10

The average balances, interest income and rates related to interest-earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, are presented below.

Interest Expense.    Interest expense decreased to $4.4 million in the first nine months of 2004 from $5.1 million in the first nine months of 2003 due to the decline in average balances of collateral held on the interest rate swaps.

Provision for Credit Losses.    The provision for credit losses was a benefit of $27,000 in the first nine months of 2004 compared with an expense of $12.6 million in the first nine months of 2003. The provision in the first nine months of 2004 included an expense of $1.9 million related to the loan portfolio and a benefit of $1.9 million related to unfunded lending commitments. The lower provision reflects improving credit conditions and a change to a lower risk profile from the first nine months of 2003 as the balances in commercial loans continued to decrease due to pay-downs. Commercial loan pay-downs have been reinvested in residential loans which have a lower risk profile.

Gain (Loss) on Interest Rate Swaps.    The gain on interest rate swaps was $12.8 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared with a gain of $16.1 million in the first nine months of 2003. The decrease was driven by an increase in the interest rate environment in 2004. Our interest rate swaps lose value in an increasing rate environment and gain value in a declining rate environment. See “Interest Rate Risk Management” for additional information related to unrealized and realized gains and losses on interest rate swaps.

Loan Servicing Costs.    Loan servicing costs decreased $1.4 million to $3.4 million in the first nine months of 2004 from $4.8 million in the first nine months of 2003 due to lower average commercial loan commitments and home equity loan balances which decreased 19% and 11%, respectively. These loans are serviced by the Bank pursuant to our participation and servicing agreements which include market-based fees.

Management Fees.    Management fees were $25.0 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared with $10.8 million in the first nine months of 2003. Management fees represent reimbursements to Wachovia for general overhead expenses paid on our behalf. Wachovia charges the management fee to affiliates on a monthly basis that have over $10.0 million in assets and over $2.0 million in estimated annual noninterest expense. If the affiliate qualifies for an allocation, the affiliate is assessed monthly management fees based on its relative percentage of total consolidated assets and noninterest expense plus a 10% markup. In the first nine months of 2003, we did not meet the monthly asset and income test every month.

Other Expenses.    Other expenses primarily consist of costs associated with foreclosures on residential properties. In the first nine months of 2004, these costs were not significant, reflecting an improving credit environment.

Income Tax Expense (Benefits).    Income tax expense, which is based on the pre-tax income of WPR, our taxable REIT subsidiary, was $5.0 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared with $5.9 million in the

11

first nine months of 2003. WPR holds our interest rate swaps and its pre-tax income in both periods reflects the gain on interest rate swaps noted above. In the first nine months of 2004 and 2003, WPR’s effective income tax rate was 35.33%.

Summary Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003

We earned net income available to common stockholders of $61.7 million and $31.7 million in the third quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. Average loans increased 2% driven by residential loans which more than doubled between these two periods. These increases were nearly offset by a 21% decrease in average commercial loans. Net interest income increased $14.2 million, or 16%, driven by higher loan balances and the purchase of higher yielding residential loans.

The gain on interest rate swaps was $13.8 million in the third quarter of 2004 compared with a loss on interest rate swaps of $5.8 million in the third quarter of 2003 reflecting the decreasing rate environment in the third quarter of 2004, contrasted to increasing rates in the same period of 2003. Management fees increased in the third quarter of 2004 from the third quarter of 2003 as a result of Wachovia’s increased expense base. Additionally, the provision for credit losses was a benefit of $5.5 million in the third quarter of 2004 compared with an expense of $7.7 million in the same period of 2003. This was driven by the refined methodology, changes in the composition of our loan portfolio and improving credit conditions. Income taxes were an expense of $5.1 million in the third quarter of 2004 compared with a benefit of $2.0 million in the third quarter of 2003, primarily as a result of a gain on interest rate swaps in the third quarter of 2004 compared with a loss on interest rate swaps in the third quarter of 2003.

The average balances, interest income and rates related to interest-earning assets for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, are presented below.

Balance Sheet Analysis

September 30, 2004 to December 31, 2003

At September 30, 2004, total assets were $12.6 billion compared with $12.5 billion at December 31, 2003. At September 30, 2004, $7.3 billion, or 58% of our assets, consisted of a 100% participation interest in commercial loans, $2.2 billion, or 18% of our assets, consisted of a 100% participation interest in residential mortgages, and $1.6 billion, or 12% of our assets, consisted of a 100% participation interest in home equity loans, before the allowance for loan losses.

Loans.    Net loans decreased $92.5 million to $11.0 billion at September 30, 2004, compared with December 31, 2003, reflecting an 18% decrease in commercial loans partially offset by a 63% increase in residential loans in the same time period. In addition, we purchased $2.1 billion of residential loans from the Bank between December 31, 2003, and September 30, 2004. See Table 2 following “Accounting and Regulatory Matters” for additional information.

12

The fair value of $2.1 billion of fixed rate loans and loan participations was approximately $2.2 billion and the fair value of $8.9 billion of variable rate loans and loan participations was approximately $8.5 billion at September 30, 2004.

Allowance for Loan Losses.    The allowance for loan losses decreased $960,000 from December 31, 2003, to $103.2 million at September 30, 2004. The decrease reflects changes in the composition of our loan portfolio and the resulting lower risk profile as well as improving credit conditions. The impact of these changes was offset by an increase as a result of the refinement in the methodologies used in determining certain components of the allowance, which is discussed further in the “Critical Accounting Policies” section.

The reserve for unfunded lending commitments, which is included in other liabilities, was $881,000 at September 30, 2004, and declined $1.9 million in the first nine months of 2004. The decline was primarily related to declining outstanding commitments in our loan portfolio.

The allowance for credit losses, which includes both the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded lending commitments, amounted to $104.1 million at September 30, 2004, compared with $107.0 million at December 31, 2003.

See Table 3 and Table 5 following “Accounting and Regulatory Matters” for additional information related to the allowance for loan losses and to the reserve for unfunded lending commitments, respectively.

Interest Rate Swaps.    Interest rate swaps decreased to $494.4 million at September 30, 2004, from $519.0 million at December 31, 2003, which represents the fair value of our net position in interest rate swaps. The fair value decreases during a rising interest rate environment and as cash is received.

Accounts Receivable/Payable—Affiliates, Net.    Net accounts receivable/payable from affiliates was a net payable position of $241.9 million at September 30, 2004, compared with a net accounts payable position of $149.2 million at December 31, 2003, as a result of intercompany cash transactions, which are primarily related to loan activity.

Collateral Held on Interest Rate Swaps.    Collateral held on interest rate swaps decreased to $493.6 million at September 30, 2004, from $519.5 million at December 31, 2003, reflecting a decrease in the fair value of the interest rate swaps.

Commitments

Our commercial loan portfolio includes unfunded loan commitments that are provided in the normal course of business. For commercial borrowers, loan commitments generally take the form of revolving credit arrangements to finance customers’ working capital requirements. These instruments are not recorded on the balance sheet until funds are advanced under the commitment. For lending commitments, the contractual amount of a commitment represents the maximum potential credit risk if the entire commitment is funded and the borrower does not perform according to the terms of the contract. A large majority of these commitments expire without being funded, and accordingly, total contractual amounts are not representative of our actual future credit exposure or liquidity requirements. The “Risk Governance and Administration—Credit Risk Management” section in our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K describes how Wachovia, as owner of the Bank which originates and services the loans, manages credit risk when extending credit.

Loan commitments create credit risk in the event the counterparty draws on the commitment and subsequently fails to perform under the terms of the lending agreement. This risk is incorporated into an overall evaluation of credit risk and to the extent necessary, reserves are recorded on these commitments. See “Critical Accounting Policies” for additional information related to the reserve for unfunded lending commitments. Uncertainties around the timing and amount of funding under these commitments may create liquidity risk. At September 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, unfunded commitments to extend credit were $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively.

13

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our internal sources of liquidity generally include cash generated from our operations and principal repaid on loans. In addition, any necessary liquidity could be obtained by drawing on the line of credit we have with the Bank. Under the terms of that facility, we can borrow up to $2.0 billion under a revolving demand note at a rate of interest equal to the federal funds rate. Further, we could issue additional common or preferred stock, subject to any pre-approval rights of our shareholders. We believe that our existing sources of liquidity are sufficient to meet our funding needs.

Risk Governance and Administration

For additional information on credit risk management, concentration of credit risk, operational risk management, liquidity risk management and financial disclosure, please refer to our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Interest Rate Risk Management

Interest rate risk is the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates. Our income consists primarily of interest income on our variable rate loans. If there is a further decline in market interest rates, we may experience a reduction in interest income on our loan portfolio and a corresponding decrease in funds available to be distributed to our shareholders. The reduction in interest income may result from downward adjustments of the indices on which the interest rates on loans are based and from prepayments of loans with fixed interest rates, resulting in reinvestment of the proceeds in lower yielding assets.

At September 30, 2004, approximately 19% of the loans in our portfolio had fixed interest rates. Such loans tend to increase our interest rate risk. We monitor the rate sensitivity of our asset position. Our methods for evaluating interest rate risk include an analysis of interest-rate sensitivity “gap”, which is defined as the difference between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within a given time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds interest rate-sensitive assets.

During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in interest income. During a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to affect net interest income adversely. Because different types of assets and liabilities with the same or similar maturities may react differently to changes in overall market rates or conditions, changes in interest rates may affect net interest income positively or negatively even if an institution is perfectly matched in each maturity category.

At September 30, 2004, $10.0 billion, or 80% of our assets, had variable interest rates and could be expected to reprice with changes in interest rates. At September 30, 2004, our liabilities were $831.4 million, or 7% of our assets, while stockholders’ equity was $11.7 billion, or 93% of our assets. This positive gap between our assets and liabilities indicates that an increase in interest rates would result in an increase in net interest income and a decrease in interest rates would result in a decrease in net interest income.

We account for derivative financial instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as subsequently amended by SFAS 137, SFAS 138 and SFAS 149, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivatives and hedging activities. Under SFAS 133, all our derivatives (currently consisting of interest rate swaps) are recorded at fair value on the balance sheets. When we have more than one transaction with a counterparty and there is a legally enforceable master netting agreement between the parties, the net of the gain and loss positions are recorded as an asset or a liability on our consolidated balance sheets. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a net gain or loss on interest rate swaps on our consolidated statements of income.

14

In 2001, the Bank contributed receive-fixed interest rate swaps to us in exchange for common stock. Subsequent to the contribution, we entered into pay-fixed interest rate swaps that serve as an economic hedge to the receive-fixed interest rate swaps. Currently, we do not expect to enter into additional derivative transactions.

At September 30, 2004, our position in interest rate swaps was an asset of $958.8 million and a liability of $464.4 million, which is recorded net on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The following table presents interest rate swap maturities.

Market Risk Management

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in lending, investment in derivative financial instruments and borrowing activities.

At September 30, 2004, our receive-fixed interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $4.25 billion had a weighted average maturity of 7.50 years, weighted average receive rate of 7.41% and weighted average pay rate of 1.89%. Our pay-fixed interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $4.25 billion had a weighted average maturity of 7.50 years, weighted average receive rate of 1.89% and weighted average pay rate of 5.69% at September 30, 2004. All the interest rate swaps have variable pay or receive rates based on three- or six-month LIBOR, and they are the pay or receive rates in effect at September 30, 2004.

Due to the difference in fixed rates in our interest rate swaps, short-term volatility is expected given certain interest rate fluctuations. If market rates were to decrease 100 basis points or 200 basis points, we would recognize short-term net gains on our interest rate swaps of $18.8 million or $38.7 million, respectively. If market rates were to increase 100 basis points or 200 basis points, we would recognize short-term net losses on our interest rate swaps of $17.8 million or $34.6 million, respectively. Short-term fluctuations will eventually offset over the life of the interest rate swaps when held to maturity, with no change in cash flow occurring for the net positions. The changes in value of the net swap positions were calculated under the assumption there was a parallel shift in the LIBOR curve using 100 basis point and 200 basis point shifts, respectively.

Transactions with Related Parties

We are subject to certain income and expense allocations from affiliated parties for various services received. In addition, we enter into transactions with affiliated parties in the normal course of business. The nature of the transactions with affiliated parties is discussed below.

The Bank services our loans on our behalf, which includes delegating servicing to third parties in the case of residential mortgage loans. We pay the Bank a 0.025% fee for this service on commercial loans.

15

Servicing fees related to residential loans are negotiated when the Bank purchases loans from unrelated third parties, and are based on the purchase price of the loans. Additionally, we are subject to Wachovia’s management fee policy and are allocated a monthly fee from Wachovia for general overhead expenses paid on our behalf if we meet certain asset and expense criteria. We met these criteria in 2004 and most of 2003 and expect to continue to meet these criteria in the future and therefore expect that we will continue to incur management fee expense. We also have a swap servicing and fee arrangement with the Bank, whereby the Bank provides operations, back office, book entry, record keeping and valuation services related to our interest rate swaps, for which we pay a fee to the Bank.

Eurodollar deposit investments with the Bank are our primary cash management vehicle. We have also entered into certain loan participations with affiliates and are allocated a portion of all income associated with these loans.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we paid the Bank $2.1 billion in cash for residential loans, which reflected a fair value purchase price.

The Bank acts as our collateral custodian in connection with collateral pledged to us related to our interest rate swaps. For this service, we pay the Bank a fee based on the value of the collateral. In addition, the Bank is permitted to rehypothecate and use as its own the collateral held by the Bank as our custodian. The Bank pays us a fee based on the value of the collateral involved for this right. The Bank also provides a guaranty of our obligations under the interest rate swaps when the swaps are in a net payable position, for which we pay a monthly fee based on the absolute value of the net notional amount of the interest rate swaps.

Accounting and Regulatory Matters

The following information addresses new or proposed accounting pronouncements related to our industry as well as legislation that has had a significant impact on our industry.

Purchased Loans.    In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position (“SOP”) 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer, which addresses the accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and expected cash flows for loans acquired in a transfer when those differences are attributable at least in part to a decline in credit quality. The scope of SOP 03-3 includes loans that have shown evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination, and includes loans acquired individually, in pools or as part of a business combination. Under SOP 03-3, the difference between expected cash flows and the purchase price is accreted as an adjustment to yield over the life of the acquired loans. The difference between contractual cash flows and expected cash flows is not subject to accretion under SOP 03-3. SOP 03-3, is effective for loans acquired beginning in 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact its adoption will have on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Regulatory Matters.    Various legislative and regulatory proposals concerning the financial services industry are pending in Congress, the legislatures in states in which we conduct operations, and before various regulatory agencies that supervise our operations. Given the uncertainty of the legislative and regulatory process, we cannot assess the impact of any such legislation or regulations on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

16

Table 1    PERFORMANCE AND DIVIDEND PAYOUT RATIOS

17

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Information required by this Item 3 is set forth in Item 2 under the caption “Risk Governance and Administration” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures.

As of September 30, 2004, Wachovia Funding carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of Wachovia Funding’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Wachovia Funding’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, Wachovia Funding’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no changes in internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls.

18

Part II.    OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings.

We are not the subject of any litigation. We, Wachovia and the Bank are not currently involved in nor, to our knowledge, currently threatened with any material litigation with respect to the assets included in our portfolio, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on information currently available, advice of counsel, available insurance coverage and established reserves, we believe that the eventual outcome of the actions against us and/or our subsidiaries will not, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of those matters, if unfavorable, may be material to our results of operations for any particular period.

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Not applicable.

Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Wachovia Funding held its annual meeting of stockholders on November 5, 2004. At the annual meeting, the only item voted upon by Wachovia Funding stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting was to elect our directors for a one-year term. The following sets forth the number of votes cast “for” and “withheld” with respect to each of the nominees for director.

Item 5.    Other Information.

Not applicable.

19

Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a)    Exhibits.

(b)    Reports on Form 8-K.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, Wachovia Funding did not file any Current Reports on

Form 8-K with the Commission.

20

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 10, 2004

21

EXHIBIT INDEX

22