UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-30231
TANOX, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 76-0196733 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
10301 Stella Link Houston, Texas |
77025 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(713) 578-4000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨
Number of shares of common shares outstanding at October 29, 2004: 43,971,548.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
INDEX
Page | ||||||
Part I Financial Information |
||||||
Item 1 Financial Statements |
||||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 |
1 | |||||
2 | ||||||
3 | ||||||
4 | ||||||
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
8 | |||||
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
15 | |||||
Item 4 Controls and Procedures |
15 | |||||
Part II Other Information |
||||||
Item 1 Legal Proceedings |
16 | |||||
Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
16 | |||||
17 |
i
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Shares and Per Share Data)
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 40,483 | $ | 46,350 | ||||
Restricted cash |
5,018 | 10,536 | ||||||
Short-term investments, including a restricted amount of $5,431 in 2003 |
116,650 | 106,711 | ||||||
Interest receivable |
2,031 | 3,002 | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
2,626 | 1,706 | ||||||
Accounts receivable from related party |
67 | 184 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
504 | 276 | ||||||
Total current assets |
167,379 | 168,765 | ||||||
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS |
45,840 | 63,837 | ||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT, NET |
24,250 | 19,205 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
8 | 49 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 237,477 | $ | 251,856 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 1,164 | $ | 968 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
2,980 | 3,390 | ||||||
Accrued arbitration award |
622 | 9,841 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
4,766 | 14,199 | ||||||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Note payable to bank |
5,000 | 5,000 | ||||||
Note payable to related party |
| 10,000 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
5,000 | 15,000 | ||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 120,000,000 shares authorized; 44,526,328 and 44,470,446 shares issued, and 43,971,628 and 43,915,746 shares outstanding in 2004 and 2003, respectively |
445 | 445 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
322,588 | 311,324 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 554,700 shares in 2004 and 2003, respectively |
(6,261 | ) | (6,261 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
931 | 694 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(89,992 | ) | (83,545 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
227,711 | 222,657 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 237,477 | $ | 251,856 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||||||||||
Development agreements and licensing fees, net of arbitration award in 2003 |
$ | 103 | $ | 176 | $ | 3,610 | $ | 11,952 | ||||||||
Development agreement with related party |
48 | 222 | 3,455 | 3,222 | ||||||||||||
Royalties, net of arbitration award |
2,298 | 501 | 7,810 | 502 | ||||||||||||
Royalties from related party, net of arbitration award |
17 | | 44 | | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
2,466 | 899 | 14,919 | 15,676 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
6,622 | 5,264 | 18,698 | 15,761 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,639 | 1,214 | 5,150 | 5,801 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
8,261 | 6,478 | 23,848 | 21,562 | ||||||||||||
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS |
(5,795 | ) | (5,579 | ) | (8,929 | ) | (5,886 | ) | ||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
941 | 1,439 | 2,745 | 4,598 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(33 | ) | (106 | ) | (126 | ) | (344 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net |
(26 | ) | (115 | ) | (137 | ) | (386 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
882 | 1,218 | 2,482 | 3,868 | ||||||||||||
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT |
(4,913 | ) | (4,361 | ) | (6,447 | ) | (2,018 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax benefit |
| | | (228 | ) | |||||||||||
NET LOSS |
$ | (4,913 | ) | $ | (4,361 | ) | $ | (6,447 | ) | $ | (1,790 | ) | ||||
NET LOSS PER BASIC and DILUTED SHARE |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | ||||
SHARES USED IN COMPUTING NET LOSS PER SHARE BASIC and DILUTED: |
44,006 | 43,806 | 44,014 | 43,789 | ||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (4,913 | ) | $ | (4,361 | ) | $ | (6,447 | ) | $ | (1,790 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| | | (168 | ) | |||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale security |
(221 | ) | 391 | 237 | 643 | |||||||||||
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS |
$ | (5,134 | ) | $ | (3,970 | ) | $ | (6,210 | ) | $ | (1,315 | ) | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In Thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (6,447 | ) | $ | (1,790 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,895 | 1,689 | ||||||
Compensation expense related to stock options |
30 | 46 | ||||||
Loss on sale of equipment |
| 348 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Increase in receivables and other assets |
(19 | ) | (309 | ) | ||||
(Decrease) increase in current liabilities |
(8,691 | ) | 2,955 | |||||
Other, net |
| 123 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(13,232 | ) | 3,062 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Additions to property and equipment |
(6,978 | ) | (1,132 | ) | ||||
Purchases of investments |
(108,885 | ) | (59,660 | ) | ||||
Maturities and sales of investments |
117,180 | 81,372 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of equipment |
38 | 51 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
5,518 | (4,954 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
6,873 | 15,677 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of stock |
492 | 996 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
492 | 996 | ||||||
IMPACT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH |
| (168 | ) | |||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(5,867 | ) | 19,567 | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
46,350 | 15,968 | ||||||
End of period |
$ | 40,483 | $ | 35,535 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||
Capital contribution from forgiveness of note payable by a related party |
10,000 | | ||||||
Capital contribution from forgiveness of interest by a related party |
742 | | ||||||
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale security |
237 | 643 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2004
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Consolidation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and include the accounts of Tanox, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary (collectively the Company or Tanox). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These condensed consolidated interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004.
2. Revenues
Development Agreements and Licensing Fees. Development agreement revenue includes reimbursement by Genentech, Inc. (Genentech) and Novartis Pharma A.G. (Novartis), of selected current quarter and current year clinical trial costs incurred for TNX-901. Development agreement revenue for the first nine months also includes $6.6 million received under the terms of the Tripartite Collaboration Agreement among Novartis, Genentech and Tanox dated February 25, 2004, representing reimbursement by Genentech and Novartis of a portion of the TNX-901 development costs incurred by Tanox in previous years. Licensing fee revenue includes payments received in exchange for rights to license and sublicense Tanoxs technology or product rights.
Royalties. Royalty income of $2.3 million and $7.9 million on the net sales of Xolair during the current quarter and first nine months of the year, respectively, was calculated based on net sales reported to us by Genentech and Novartis. Royalty income reflects credits for prior milestone payments made to Tanox and a one-time credit of $2 million in favor of Genentech when net annual sales of Xolair exceeded $100 million during the third quarter. Royalty income is net of amounts which are payable by Tanox to its former attorneys (see Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies).
We have estimated that, after giving effect to the payments to our former attorneys, the blended rate of our net royalty and profit sharing receipts will be in the range of 8% and 12% of net worldwide sales of Xolair. Due to milestone credits noted above, the rate during 2003 and through the second quarter of 2004 has been below this range at approximately 7.5%. The net royalty rate earned in the third quarter of 2004 was further reduced as a result of the one-time credit of $2 million due to Genentech. Because the milestone credits that had been reducing royalties were exhausted in the third quarter of 2004, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2004, our blended royalty rate is expected to be higher than historical rates.
3. Cash, Cash Equivalents, Short-term and Long-term Investments
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Management determines the appropriate classification of its cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments at the time of purchase. Investments consist of investment grade corporate bonds, commercial
4
paper, asset-backed securities, and government agency securities with maturities of less than three years from the balance sheet date. All investments are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost in the accompanying financial statements with the exception of one available-for-sale investment, which is stated at fair value based on the quoted market price of the investment. Unrealized gains and losses on the available-for-sale investment are reported as other comprehensive income (loss), which is a separate component of stockholders equity.
Tanoxs net carrying value of cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash) at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, was $45.5 million and $56.9 million, respectively.
Investments consist of the following (in thousands):
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 | |||||
Held-to-maturity investments short-term |
$ | 115,503 | $ | 105,801 | ||
Available-for-sale investment |
1,147 | 910 | ||||
Total short-term investments |
116,650 | 106,711 | ||||
Held-to-maturity investments long-term |
45,840 | 63,837 | ||||
$ | 162,490 | $ | 170,548 | |||
Tanoxs net carrying value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investments at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, was $162.5 million and $170.5 million, respectively. The fair value of these investments at September 30 2004 and December 31, 2003, was $161.9 million and $170.6 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2004, investments in securities with credit ratings of A were 38%, AA were 15% and AAA were 47% of the total held-to-maturity investment portfolio.
4. Line of Credit Note
Tanox borrowed $5.0 million in September 2002 from a bank under a $16.0 million Revolving Line of Credit Note Agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, Tanox may secure advances up to the aggregate principal amount of $16.0 million, the proceeds of which can be used to finance the purchase of property, plant and equipment. The outstanding balance is payable in full on September 27, 2006, and advances bear interest at the lesser of the Prime Rate or LIBOR plus 1%, which at September 30, 2004 was 2.875%. The Note is collateralized with cash and investments equal to or greater than 100% of the outstanding principal balance of the Note.
5
5. Net Loss per Share
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) No. 128, Earnings Per Share, requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS). Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is computed in the same manner as basic EPS, except that diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that would occur if outstanding options and warrants were exercised. Tanox incurred net losses for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003; therefore, all options outstanding for each of the periods were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because they would have been antidilutive.
6. Stock Based Compensation
Tanox has adopted the disclosure requirements of FASB Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (FASB 148) effective December 2002. FASB 148 amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (FASB 123), to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation and also amends the disclosure requirements of FASB 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the methods of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. As permitted by FASB 148 and FASB 123, the Company continues to apply the accounting provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations, with regard to the measurement of compensation cost for options granted under our stock-based compensation plans. Under the intrinsic value method described in APB Option No. 25, no compensation expense is recognized if the exercise price of the employee stock option equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, no employee compensation expense was recorded.
Assuming the compensation cost for the stock option plans had been determined pursuant to the fair value method under FASB No. 123, Tanoxs pro forma net loss would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Net loss |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | (4,913 | ) | $ | (4,361 | ) | $ | (6,447 | ) | $ | (1,790 | ) | ||||
Stock option compensation included in the determination of net loss as reported |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Stock option compensation expense if the fair value method had been applied |
(979 | ) | (1,285 | ) | (3,819 | ) | (3,560 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net loss |
$ | (5,892 | ) | $ | (5,646 | ) | $ | (10,266 | ) | $ | (5,350 | ) | ||||
Loss per share Basic and Diluted |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | ||||
Pro forma |
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) |
6
On March 31, 2004, the FASB issued an Exposure Draft, Share-Based Payment An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95. The proposed Statement addresses the accounting for transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprises equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. The proposed Statement would eliminate the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB 25 and would require instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value based method. Tanox would be required to recognize an expense for employee compensation cost related to share-based payment arrangements including stock options. The new rules would be applied on a modified prospective basis as defined in the Exposure Draft, and would be effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. In October 2004, this effective date was delayed until June 15, 2005. The proposed Statement may require changes in Tanoxs option valuation methodology and assumptions. Current estimates of option values using the Black-Scholes (as used in the above table) method may not be indicative of results from valuation methodologies required by the final rules.
7. Commitments and Contingencies
Tanox had been engaged in litigation in connection with a fee dispute with the law firms that represented the Company in litigation with Genentech relating to, among other items, the intellectual property rights surrounding the development of anti-IgE technology. An arbitration panel issued an award entitling the attorneys to receive (1) approximately $3.5 million, including interest, (2) payments ranging from 33 1/3% to 40% of the future milestone payments, in excess of the first $1 million, Tanox would receive from Genentech following product approval, and (3) 10% of the royalties that Tanox would receive on all sales of certain anti-IgE products, including Xolair. The 10% of royalties received by Tanox is required to be paid to the attorneys within 30 days of the end of the calendar quarter in which the royalty payments are received by Tanox. At September 30, 2004, Tanox had an accrued liability of $622,000 with respect to amounts that would be payable to the attorneys on royalties received or receivable by Tanox on net sales of Xolair through September 30, 2004.
From time to time, Tanox is a defendant in other lawsuits incidental to its business. Management believes that the outcome of these lawsuits will not be material to Tanoxs financial statements.
8. Subsequent Event
Tanox, Inc. is in contract negotiations with Biogen Idec, Inc. to acquire manufacturing assets and assume the lease on a manufacturing facility in San Diego, California. If finalized, the transaction would allow Tanox to expand its manufacturing capacity to support the development of products for its clinical trials programs. The pending acquisition is consistent with the companys strategy of expanding manufacturing capabilities to enhance its core operations. Negotiations are expected to be concluded in the fourth quarter of this year.
7
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
OVERVIEW
Tanox discovers and develops therapeutic monoclonal antibodies to address significant unmet medical needs in the areas of asthma, allergy, inflammation and other diseases affecting the human immune system, as well as infectious diseases. Our products are genetically engineered antibodies that target a specific molecule or antigen.
Our first product, Xolair® (omalizumab) For Subcutaneous Use, was developed in collaboration with Genentech and Novartis. Xolair received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) marketing approval on June 20, 2003, and was launched in the U.S. in July 2003. Xolair is currently labeled for treatment of adults and adolescents (12 years of age and above) with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma who have a positive skin test or in vitro reactivity to a perennial aeroallergen and whose symptoms are inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids.
In the second quarter of 2004, Novartis and Genentech initiated clinical trials to test the safety and efficacy of Xolair to treat pediatric allergic asthma patients and peanut allergy patients. The pediatric allergic asthma Phase 3 trial is designed as a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled and global multi-site study, which will enroll approximately 570 patients who are between 6 and 12 years old. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xolair in children with moderate-to-severe, persistent and inadequately controlled allergic asthma. The peanut allergy Phase 2 trial is designed as a 38-week, multi-site study. Approximately 150 patients, between 6 and 75 years old with established peanut allergy, will be randomized 2-to-1 to receive Xolair or placebo. The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of Xolair in preventing peanut-induced allergic reactions in patients with peanut allergy.
In June 2004, Novartis submitted its application for Xolair to the Committee for Medicinal Products of the European Medicines Agency for review. The proposed indication will focus on the prevention of asthma exacerbations and control of symptoms in adult and adolescent patients with severe persistent allergic asthma, who remain inadequately controlled despite use of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-2 agonists, as well as other controller medications.
In the third quarter of 2004, we recorded net royalty revenue of $2.3 million from sales of Xolair, bringing the current year net royalty revenue to $7.9 million. Under our collaboration agreements with Genentech and Novartis, we receive royalties on the net sales of Xolair and will share in Novartis net profits from sales of Xolair in the United States. Over the next several years, we expect our principal revenues will be royalties and profit-sharing payments relating to sales of Xolair.
We have estimated that, after giving effect to the payments to our former attorneys, the blended rate of our net royalty and profit sharing receipts will be in the range of 8% and 12% of worldwide net sales of Xolair. Because of royalty credits associated with previous milestone payments, the rate during 2003 and through the second quarter of 2004 has been below this range at approximately 7.5%. The net royalty rate earned in the third quarter of 2004 was further reduced as a result of the one-time credit of $2 million due to Genentech. Because the milestone credits that had been reducing royalties were exhausted in the third quarter of 2004, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2004, our blended royalty rate is expected to be higher than historical rates.
Our most advanced development product is TNX-355, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the CD4 receptor on T-lymphocytes and blocks HIV entry. TNX-355 is being evaluated as a treatment for HIV infection, and in May 2004, Tanox initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial of this agent. Approximately 80 antiretroviral treatment experienced HIV infected individuals will be enrolled in a 48-week multi-center, randomized, double-blind,
8
placebo-controlled, three arm study. The objective of the study is to evaluate safety, tolerability and pharmacological activity of TNX-355 with optimized background therapy. The primary evaluation will be conducted on the 24-week data, which is expected in late 2005. TNX-355 received fast track status from the FDA in 2003.
In addition to TNX-355, we have four preclinical candidates in our research pipeline. TNX-650 is the most advanced of these candidates. It targets a cytokine, with intrinsic asthma as its initial target indication. TNX-558 targets complement C5a for acute inflammatory disease. TNX-717 is an osteoblast apoptosis inhibitor for the treatment of osteoporosis and bone fracture and TNX-668 targets a cytokine for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We intend to strengthen our pipeline through in-licensing or acquisition opportunities in our core disease areas of asthma, allergy, inflammation and infectious diseases, as well as expanding into oncology. We are actively evaluating several potential opportunities.
Critical Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and footnotes thereto. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from development agreements include payments for milestone achievements and sponsored research and development costs. Milestone payments are received under best efforts contracts and are not refundable. They are recognized as revenue when the milestones are achieved and there are no remaining performance obligations. Revenues for sponsored research and development are recognized as revenue as we complete our obligations related to such activities. Any revenue contingent upon future performance is deferred and recognized as the performance is completed. Under our collaboration agreements with Genentech and Novartis, we receive a royalty on the net sales of Xolair worldwide and share in Novartis net profits from Xolair sales in the United States. Royalty revenue is recorded monthly based on contractual terms and information provided by Genentech and Novartis. Royalties are reconciled and adjusted if actual results differ from those previously reported to us. Revenues recognized are net of certain milestone and other credits and amounts due to our former attorneys under an arbitration award.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses consist of direct costs and indirect overhead costs, including facilities costs, salaries, related benefit costs and material and supply costs. Expenses may also include upfront fees and milestones paid to licensors and collaborative partners. Such amounts are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs also include estimates for clinical trial costs, which are based on patient enrollment and clinical trial progress. Actual costs may differ from estimates.
9
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
Total Revenues. Total revenues and dollar and percentage changes compared to the corresponding period in the prior year are as follows:
Three months ended September 30, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 | |||||
Development agreements and licensing fees |
$ | 151 | $ | 398 | |||
Royalties |
2,315 | 501 | |||||
Total revenues |
$ | 2,466 | $ | 899 | |||
Dollar increase |
$ | 1,567 | |||||
Percentage increase |
174 | % |
The increase in revenue resulted from higher royalties due to the increased sales of Xolair.
Research and Development Expenses. Our research and development activities can be divided into clinical stage programs, which currently include TNX-355 and TNX-901 (limited to the extension trial), and research and preclinical stage programs, which include TNX-650, targeting intrinsic asthma, TNX-717 for the treatment of osteoporosis and bone fracture, TNX-668 for SLE, TNX-558 for acute inflammatory disease and other discovery and exploratory research projects. For the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the cost associated with research and development programs, including overhead allocation, are as follows:
Three months ended September 30, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 | |||||
Clinical stage programs |
$ | 4,794 | $ | 3,846 | |||
Exploratory research and preclinical stage programs |
1,828 | 1,418 | |||||
Total research and development expenses |
$ | 6,622 | $ | 5,264 | |||
Dollar increase |
$ | 1,358 | |||||
Percentage increase |
26 | % |
The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to additional expenses associated with TNX-355 development activities and increased spending for preclinical stage programs.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses and dollar and percentage changes as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year are as follows:
Three months ended September 30, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 | |||||
Total general and administrative expense |
$ | 1,639 | $ | 1,214 | |||
Dollar increase |
$ | 425 | |||||
Percentage increase |
35 | % |
The increase in general and administrative expenses resulted from increased audit and consulting fees in 2004 which were partially offset by reduced employee benefits and commercial insurance expenses.
10
Other Income (Expense). Other income was $882,000 and $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. This decrease was principally due to reduced interest income in 2004 resulting from lower average interest rates and lower amounts available for investment.
Net Loss. For the three months ended September 30, 2004, we recorded a net loss of $4.9 million, versus a net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2003 of $4.4 million.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
Total Revenues. Total revenues and dollar and percentage changes compared to the corresponding period in the prior year are as follows:
Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 | |||||
Development agreements and licensing fees |
$ | 7,065 | $ | 15,174 | |||
Royalties |
7,854 | 502 | |||||
Total revenues |
$ | 14,919 | $ | 15,676 | |||
Dollar decrease |
$ | 757 | |||||
Percentage decrease |
5 | % |
The decrease in revenue resulted from higher royalty revenue due to increased sales of Xolair which were offset by a decrease in development revenue. Revenues from development agreements and licensing fees (net) consisted mainly of a $14.7 million payment for the FDA approval of Xolair in July 2003 versus $6.6 million of TNX-901 development costs reimbursed in 2004.
Research and Development Expenses. Our research and development activities can be divided into clinical stage programs, which currently include TNX-355 and TNX-901 (limited to the extension trial), and research and preclinical stage programs, which include TNX-650, targeting intrinsic asthma, TNX-717 for the treatment of osteoporosis and bone fracture, TNX-668 for SLE, TNX-558 for acute inflammatory disease and other discovery and exploratory research projects. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the cost associated with research and development programs, including overhead allocation, are as follows:
Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 | |||||
Clinical stage programs |
$ | 13,175 | $ | 11,593 | |||
Exploratory research and preclinical stage programs |
5,523 | 4,168 | |||||
Total research and development expenses |
$ | 18,698 | $ | 15,761 | |||
Dollar increase |
$ | 2,937 | |||||
Percentage increase |
19 | % |
The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to increased spending for consulting fees, contract research, testing and manufacturing and employee related costs.
11
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses and dollar and percentage changes as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year are as follows:
Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||
(in thousands)
|
2004 |
2003 | |||||
Total general and administrative expense |
$ | 5,150 | $ | 5,801 | |||
Dollar decrease |
$ | 651 | |||||
Percentage decrease |
11 | % |
The decrease in general and administrative expenses reflects reduced litigation expenses partially offset by increased personnel cost, accounting fees, directors and officers insurance expense and consulting fees.
Other Income (Expense). Other income was $2.5 million and $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. This decrease was principally due to reduced interest income in 2004 resulting from lower average interest rates and lower amounts available for investment.
Income Tax Benefit. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we received a refund related to Alternative Minimum Taxes paid in 1996 and 1997 which we recorded as a credit (benefit) of $228,000.
Net Loss. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we recorded a net loss of $6.4 million, versus a net loss of $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The lower net loss in 2003 is primarily due to the milestone revenue triggered by the FDA approval of Xolair on June 20, 2003.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash, cash equivalents and investments decreased by $19.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to $208.0 million from $227.4 million at December 31, 2003. This decrease in funds was primarily due to funding operating activities and capital expenditures as well as the release from escrow of $9.7 million to our former attorneys, partially offset by royalty revenue and the $6.6 million in development revenue received under the terms of the three-party collaboration agreement with Genentech and Novartis as reimbursement of a portion of TNX-901 development costs incurred in previous years.
Net cash used in operating activities was $13.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to net cash provided by these activities of $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The 2004 use of cash was comprised mainly of a net loss of $6.4 million and a decrease in current liabilities of $8.7 million, the majority of which was related to the release of escrowed funds to our former attorneys in connection with the accrued arbitration award. In the same period for 2003, cash provided by operating activities was comprised mainly of a net loss of $1.8 million and an increase in current liabilities of $3.0 million, related primarily to accrued litigation costs.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $6.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $15.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. In 2004, restricted cash decreased by $5.5 million, due to the release of escrowed funds in connection with the accrued arbitration award. Investments, net of maturities and investments, decreased by $8.3 million and $7.0 million was invested into property and equipment. For 2003, investments, net of maturities and purchases, decreased by $21.7 million. This was partially offset by an increase in restricted cash of $5.0 million due to the maturity of a restricted investment.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $492,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $996,000 for the same period in 2003. These inflows of cash resulted from stock option exercises.
12
Tanox entered into a manufacturing and supply agreement in July 2004 to have a third-party manufacture and supply TNX-355 for Phase 3 clinical trials and potential product launch. Payments due to this third-party will be based on the achievement of manufacturing deliverables and the commencement and size of the clinical trials. Under the terms of the agreement, if we were to terminate the agreement before or upon completion of the technology transfer deliverable, we may be required to pay a cancellation fee equal to 25% of the uninvoiced portion of the remaining budget of the process development program, as defined in the agreement. After a payment of $400,000 which was made at contract execution, this cancellation fee could be up to $1.8 million.
We had been engaged in litigation in connection with a fee dispute with the law firms that represented us in litigation with Genentech relating to, among other items, the intellectual property rights surrounding the development of anti-IgE technology. In 2003, an arbitration panel issued an award entitling the attorneys to receive (1) approximately $3.5 million, including interest, (2) payments ranging from 33 1/3% to 40% of the future milestone payments, in excess of the first $1 million, we would receive from Genentech following product approval, and (3) 10% of the royalties that we would receive on all sales of certain anti-IgE products, including Xolair. During the appeals process, we were required to place amounts in escrow to secure payment of the award, and had escrowed $9.7 million with the Harris County District Court as of December 31, 2003. These funds were released to the former attorneys in February 2004. The 10% of the royalty due to the attorneys based on Xolair sales is required to be paid within 30 days of the end of each calendar quarter in which royalty payments are received by Tanox.
In September 2002, we entered into a $16.0 million Revolving Line of Credit Note Agreement with a bank. Under the terms of the agreement, Tanox may secure advances up to the aggregate principal amount of $16.0 million, the proceeds of which can be used to finance the purchase of property, plant and equipment. The outstanding principal balance is payable in full on September 27, 2006, and advances bear interest at the lesser of the Prime Rate or LIBOR, the London Interbank Offered Rate, plus 1%. Accrued interest is payable on the last day of each month. As of September 30, 2004, we had borrowed $5.0 million under the agreement.
On February 25, 2004, Tanox, Genentech and Novartis entered into a Tripartite Collaboration Agreement to settle all outstanding litigation and arbitrations and to finalize the detailed terms of the three-party collaboration, begun in 1996, to develop and commercialize certain anti-IgE antibodies, including Xolair and TNX-901. Under the terms of the three-party collaboration agreement, Genentech and Novartis each reimbursed Tanox $3.3 million for a portion of its TNX-901 development costs, Tanox relinquished any rights to manufacture Xolair and, in exchange, will receive payments tied to the quantity of Xolair produced.
Tanox and Novartis also entered into an Amended and Restated Development and Licensing Agreement in February 2004. From 1994 through 1998, Novartis advanced Tanox $10.0 million, pursuant to a loan agreement, to finance the construction of our pilot manufacturing facility. Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Development and Licensing Agreement, the principal and accrued interest of $742,000 on this loan were forgiven in full by Novartis and recorded as a capital infusion by Tanox since Novartis is a related party for accounting purposes.
Our current and anticipated development projects will require substantial additional capital to complete. We do not expect to generate positive cash flow from operations until at least 2007. We anticipate that the amount of cash we need to fund operations, including research and development, manufacturing, other activities, and capital expenditures, will grow in the future as our projects move from research to clinical development to commercialization. We also expect that we will need to expand our drug development, business development and marketing activities, as well as our manufacturing capacity and facilities, to support the future development of our programs.
Based on our current level of operations, we expect that cash on hand and revenue from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next four years. However, our future capital needs will depend on
13
many factors, including the continued successful commercialization of Xolair, progress in our research and development activities, establishing additional collaboration and licensing arrangements, the costs and magnitude of product or technology acquisitions, the cost of preparing, filing, prosecuting, maintaining and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights, competing technological and market developments, changes in or terminations of existing collaboration and licensing arrangements, potential merger and acquisition activities, manufacturing scale-up costs and marketing and commercialization activities with respect to our other products, if we undertake those activities. Consequently, we may need to raise additional funds depending on the timing and financial requirements of these events. We do not have external committed sources of funding and we cannot assure that we will be able to obtain additional funds on acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to:
| Limit the growth of our development activities or even delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of our existing programs; |
| obtain funds through arrangements with collaboration partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights to technologies, product candidates or products that we would otherwise seek to develop or commercialize ourselves; or |
| license rights to technologies, product candidates or products on terms that are less favorable to us than might otherwise be available. |
Risk Factors
Factors Affecting Forward-Looking Statements. Some of the information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. We typically identify forward-looking statements by using terms such as may, will, should, could, expect, plan, anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, potential, continue or similar words, although we express some forward-looking statements differently. You should be aware that actual events could differ materially from those suggested in the forward-looking statement due to a number of factors, including:
| the ability to develop safe and effective drugs; |
| failure to achieve positive results in preclinical and toxicology studies in animals and clinical trials in humans; |
| failure to economically and timely manufacture sufficient amounts of our products for clinical trials and commercialization activities; |
| failure to receive, or delay in receiving, marketing approval for our products; |
| failure to successfully finance and commercialize our products, including gaining market acceptance; |
| our ability to manage relationships with collaboration partners; |
| our ability to obtain, maintain and successfully enforce patent and other proprietary rights protection of our products; |
| variability of royalty, license and other revenues; |
14
| our ability to enter into future collaboration agreements to support our research and development activities; |
| drug withdrawal from the market due to rare adverse reactions caused by the marketed drug; |
| lawsuits and payment of damages for product liability claims in human clinical trials and for products that we sell after regulatory approval; |
| lawsuits challenging the validity of our patents; |
| our ability to secure licenses from third parties holding patents that may affect the manufacture or marketing of our products; |
| competition and technological change; |
| existing and future regulations affecting our business, including the content, timing of submissions and decisions made by the FDA and other regulatory agencies; and |
| our ability to hire and retain experienced managers and scientists. |
You should also consider carefully the other factors identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which could cause our actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates relating to our investment portfolio. Our investment policy, approved by the Board of Directors, limits the amount we may invest in any one type of investment, limits the duration of the term of investments to three years or less and requires that investments are held to maturity except under rare circumstances. All cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are maintained with financial institutions that management believes are credit worthy.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Finance have concluded that Tanoxs disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) are sufficiently effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by Tanox in the reports it files under the Exchange Act is gathered, analyzed and disclosed with adequate timeliness, accuracy and completeness, based on an evaluation of such controls and procedures conducted as of the end of the period covered by this report.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Tanoxs internal control over financial reporting.
15
OTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, Tanox is a defendant in other lawsuits incidental to its business. Management believes that the outcome of these lawsuits will not be material to Tanoxs financial statements.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits.
31.1 | Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of Vice President of Finance Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32 | Certification of CEO and Vice President of Finance Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
99.1 | Earnings release of Tanox, Inc. dated November 5, 2004. |
(b) Reports furnished on Form 8-K.
None
16
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TANOX, INC. | ||||
Date: November 5, 2004 | By: | Nancy T. Chang | ||
Nancy T. Chang | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Date: November 5, 2004 | By: | Gregory P. Guidroz | ||
Gregory P. Guidroz | ||||
Vice President of Finance |
17