Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004

OR

For the transition period from                 to                

Commission File No. 000-10761

LTX Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

50 Rosemont Road

Westwood, Massachusetts 02090

(781) 461-1000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.05 per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes x    No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).    Yes x    No ¨

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on January 31, 2004 was $903,296,913.

Number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of Common Stock as of September 2, 2004:

Common Stock, Par Value $0.05 Per Share, 61,161,260 shares.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement in connection with its 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on December 8, 2004 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K Report. The Compensation Committee Report, Stock Performance Graph and Audit Committee Report of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement are expressly not incorporated herein by reference.

Table of Contents

LTX CORPORATION

INDEX

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.    Business

Introduction

LTX Corporation (“LTX” or the “Company”) designs, manufactures, markets and services semiconductor test solutions. Semiconductor designers and manufacturers worldwide, such as Analog Devices, ASE, Infineon Technologies, National Semiconductor, Philips Semiconductor, STMicroelectronics and Texas Instruments, use semiconductor test equipment to test devices at two different stages during the manufacturing process. These devices are incorporated in a wide range of products, including mobile internet equipment such as wireless access points and interfaces, broadband access products such as cable modems and DSL modems, personal communication products such as cell phones and personal digital assistants, consumer products such as televisions, videogame systems, digital cameras and automobile electronics, and for power management in portable and automotive electronics. We provide test systems, global applications consulting, repair services and operational support to over 100 customers in more than 15 countries. For additional information relating to foreign revenues, refer to Note 9 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

We offer our customers the LTX Fusion^® platform, which combines our enVision software with our Fusion HFi, Fusion HF, Fusion CX or Fusion DX configurations. Fusion was the first of a new class of test systems designed to test system-on-a-chip, or SOC, devices in a single test step. With Fusion, we believe we have the leading test system capable of testing a broad range of analog, digital, and mixed signal (a combination of digital and analog) devices, and most importantly, SOC devices, on a single platform.

LTX focuses its marketing and sales on integrated device manufacturers (IDMs), subcontractors, which perform manufacturing services for the semiconductor industry, foundries, which provide wafer manufacturing capability, and fabless companies, which design integrated circuits but have no manufacturing capability.

LTX Corporation was incorporated in Massachusetts in 1976. Our executive offices are located at 50 Rosemont Road, Westwood, Massachusetts 02090 and our telephone number is 781-461-1000. The terms “LTX” and the “Company” refer to LTX Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries unless the context otherwise specified. The Company makes its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports available, free of charge, in the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.ltx.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

1

Table of Contents

Industry Overview

The testing of devices is a critical step during the semiconductor production process. Typically, semiconductor companies test each device at two different stages during the manufacturing process to ensure its functional and electrical performance prior to shipment to the device user. These companies use semiconductor testing equipment to first test a device after it has been fabricated but before it has been packaged to eliminate non-functioning parts. Then, after the functioning devices are packaged, they are tested again to determine if they fully meet performance specifications. Testing is an important step in the manufacturing process because it allows devices to be fabricated at both maximum density and performance—a key to the competitiveness of semiconductor manufacturers. Shown below is a schematic depiction of the major steps in the semiconductor fabrication and test process.

160

Three primary factors ultimately drive demand for semiconductor test equipment:

In recent years, increases in unit production resulted primarily from the proliferation of the personal computer and growth of the telecommunications industry. We expect that future unit production growth will be augmented by the mobile internet, broadband network access, the increased use of digital signal processing (DSP) devices, and power management applications. These increases in unit production in turn lead to a corresponding increase in the need for test equipment.

Furthermore, demand is increasing worldwide for smaller, more highly integrated electronic products. This has led to ever higher performance and more complex semiconductor devices, which, in turn, results in a corresponding increase in the demand for equally sophisticated test equipment.

Finally, the introduction and adoption of a new generation of end-user products requires the development of next generation device technologies. For example, access to information is migrating from the stand-alone desktop computer, which might be physically linked to a local network, to the seamless, virtual network of the internet, which is accessible from anywhere by a variety of new portable electronic communication products. A critical enabling technology for this network and multimedia convergence is SOC. SOC provides the benefits of lower cost, smaller size and higher performance by combining advanced digital, analog and embedded memory technologies on a single device. These discrete technologies were, until recently, available only on several separate semiconductor devices, each performing a specific function. By integrating these functions on a single device, SOC enables lower cost, smaller size, higher performance, and lower power consumption.

2

Table of Contents

Although the SOC concept had been in development for several years, until recently manufacturers did not have an efficient and comprehensive method for testing these devices. Historically, device manufacturers used several narrowly focused testers, each designed to test only digital, only memory, or only mixed signal devices, but incapable of testing all three. SOC does not fit into any one of these categories because it represents the convergence of these three technologies and requires new testing technology.

The increases in unit production of devices, the increase in complexity of those devices, and, ultimately, the emergence of new semiconductor device technology have mandated changes in the design, architecture and complexity of such test equipment. Semiconductor device manufacturers must still be able to test the increasing volume and complexity of devices in a reliable, cost-effective, efficient and flexible manner. However, the increased pace of technological change, together with the large capital investments required to achieve economies of scale, are changing the nature and urgency of the challenges faced by device designers and manufacturers.

Designers and manufacturers historically have not been able to use their test floors at peak efficiency because they had to use several separate digital and mixed signal testers to perform all of their required testing. This increases their costs of ownership due to increased training requirements, greater floor space, decreased utilization and slower throughput. Furthermore, manufacturers cannot fully test new SOC designs because their current testing equipment does not include a sufficiently broad range of mixed signal instrumentation. Manufacturers are subject to further increased testing costs if their testing equipment lacks the flexibility and capacity to run parallel tests on multiple devices at one time, or multi-site testing. These problems are exacerbated when volume production of devices increases.

Fusion, the LTX Solution

Our solution is the Fusion test platform. Fusion tests new generations of highly-integrated mixed signal devices, advanced digital devices and, most importantly, SOC devices, which incorporate these technologies. The testing requirements of digital and mixed signal devices are essentially a subset of the testing requirements of SOC devices. The test requirements of all of these semiconductor devices are well within the range of Fusion’s capability. The Fusion single test platform allows our customers to use a single integrated hardware and software system to test all of these devices, rather than the multiple test systems typically required. By using a single testing platform, our customers are able to optimize their asset utilization, thereby increasing their manufacturing flexibility and lowering the overall cost of their testing processes.

Fusion is a unique solution to the SOC test challenge because it provides all of the following:

A single test platform.    Thoroughly testing an SOC device on more than one tester is either technically infeasible, because the device is not partitioned for its mixed signal, digital and embedded memory functions to operate independently from each other, or economically impractical due to the significantly higher cost of multiple testers and insertions required for comprehensive testing. Our Fusion test platform combines our test station hardware with our enVision software to provide a flexible, scalable test environment. By integrating the testing of mixed signal, digital and embedded memory functions, Fusion provides better test performance and lower cost of ownership for our customers. Our customers are also using Fusion to raise the utilization rates of their test floors in testing their digital and mixed signal devices. Not only have these customers selected Fusion as part of their SOC strategy, but they are also purchasing Fusion for capacity expansion on these traditional devices, eliminating the need for separate digital and mixed signal testers.

Multi-site test capability.    Multi-site testing, the parallel testing of more than one device (of the same type) on one testing machine at a given time, lowers the overall cost of testing devices by increasing the throughput of each testing machine. We designed Fusion to make multi-site testing easier for the test designer. Earlier generations of testing equipment required test engineers to spend significant amounts of time writing specific software programs to run tests in parallel. Our enVision software allows test engineers to expand single-site testing programs into multi-site testing programs with ease. Fusion’s hardware can be configured with a sufficient number of instruments to perform multi-site testing even on highly complex

3

Table of Contents

SOC devices. These features allow our customers to take advantage of the increased throughput offered by multi-site testing without sacrificing their ability to introduce new products to market quickly.

A full range of mixed signal instrumentation.    Testing different types of SOC input/output interfaces requires radio frequency (RF), digital signal processing (DSP), power management, time measurement, and other instruments. Fusion provides customers with the broad range of mixed signal instrumentation necessary to test these devices to the customer’s desired specifications. Mixed signal test expertise is in short supply in the industry and one of our strengths in SOC testing is the depth of our mixed signal intellectual property, based on our heritage as a pioneer in this field.

Scalable performance.    Semiconductor devices, depending upon their application, require different levels of instrument performance for testing. For example, complex SOC devices require the advanced digital testing performance, including embedded memory testing, found in traditional high-end VLSI testers, whereas consumer-oriented digital and mixed signal devices typically have less stringent digital test requirements. The Fusion single platform offers different levels of test capability at different price points, providing our customers with the ability to match test performance exactly to their needs.

Easy-to-use software for test program development.    Our enVision software provides the customer’s test engineer with an expandable library of prepackaged, reusable test program modules and debugging tools, all accessible through an easy-to-use graphical user interface. In most other testers, test engineers can reuse test code only by cutting and pasting lines of program code. enVision encapsulates test techniques into software objects that are added to the library for reuse in subsequent test programs. The test engineer can use these software objects when designing new test programs simply by dragging them with a mouse into the program flow. The ease-of-use of our software accelerates our customers’ development process, which allows them to introduce their semiconductor devices to market more rapidly.

The LTX Business Strategy

LTX’s objective is to be the leading supplier of semiconductor test equipment. Key elements of our strategy include:

Extend our technological lead in single platform testing.    We believe that a single test platform solution offers our customers the greatest flexibility in managing the utilization of their test assets, thereby decreasing the cost of test. We intend to continue to focus our resources on a single integrated hardware and software test platform solution by developing options and configurations that will extend Fusion’s reach to address cost-effectively the testing of semiconductor devices across a wider spectrum of performance and complexity. Rather than diluting our resources with a multiple platform strategy, we believe our resources will provide a higher return on investment by focusing on a single test platform for advanced digital, mixed signal, and SOC devices.

Maintain our focus on the SOC test market.    We believe that the fastest growing segment of the semiconductor industry over the next several years will be SOC. We designed our Fusion test platform specifically to provide optimal test capability for this class of devices. Because SOC technology comprises digital, analog and mixed signal technologies, the ability to test all of these elements enables a test system to be used across a wide range of devices. We intend to maintain and enhance our SOC test position by continuing to concentrate our development efforts on advanced functions and options for Fusion.

Concentrate our sales, applications consulting, and service efforts on key accounts.    We recognize that large, diversified semiconductor device manufacturers, commonly referred to as IDMs, large offshore test and assembly companies and certain fabless semiconductor device designers purchase most of the world’s test equipment, and that the level of support we are able to provide to them has a direct impact on future business. We believe that focusing our sales and support resources on these key semiconductor companies is the most efficient way to maximize revenue. Therefore, we have organized our selling, field service, and field applications organizations around these key companies, and located these resources close to their facilities. This has helped us to increase our responsiveness to customers’ needs and develop collaborative relationships that help guide us in developing future applications and system options.

4

Table of Contents

Further improve the flexibility of our business model.    In order to focus our resources on the development of Fusion, improve our responsiveness to customer needs, reduce fixed costs and working capital requirements, and manage the cyclicality of our industry more effectively, we have implemented a more flexible business model. With the completion of the transition of our assembly, system integration and testing operations to Jabil Circuit, substantially all of our manufacturing functions have been outsourced to third parties. We augment our focused internal development resources through our Open Platform Program, which was designed to facilitate third party development of instrumentation for our Fusion platform using standardized hardware and open software interfaces to our Fusion hardware and enVision operating system. We engage contract employees to address periods of peak demand. Through our strategic alliances, we have implemented additional international distribution and sub-contracted repair and support functions. We intend to continue to identify and implement programs which enhance our ability to meet customers’ needs while reducing fixed costs.

Fusion Overview

Fusion offers a unique solution for testing the full spectrum of non-memory devices, consisting of SOC, mixed signal, and digital devices. The Fusion test platform provides customers with highly reliable test performance and cost-efficiency in their efforts to accelerate their time-to-market for SOC, mixed signal, and digital devices. The Fusion test platform combines our test station hardware with our enVision software and is available in Fusion HFi, Fusion HF, Fusion CX and Fusion DX configurations. These configurations depend primarily on the digital complexity of the device to be tested.

enVision

Our enVision software helps customers design device test programs faster and more efficiently by providing a customer’s test engineer with an expandable library of prepackaged, reusable test program modules and debugging tools, all accessible through an easy-to-use graphical user interface. In most other testers, test engineers can reuse test code only by cutting and pasting lines of program code. enVision software circumvents much of this laborious process by encapsulating test techniques into software objects that are added to the library for reuse in subsequent test programs. The test engineer can use these software objects when designing new test programs simply by inserting them into the program flow.

Fusion HF and HFi

Our Fusion HF is one of the most advanced testers available. The Fusion HF and HFi (described below) feature up to 1,024 digital pins, mixed signal and RF test instruments, and power management test technology. Before the advent of Fusion HF, semiconductor manufacturers required several narrowly focused testers, designed to test only digital, with or without embedded memory, or only mixed signal devices, but not all three. Since the Fusion HF single platform can efficiently test complex devices ranging from mixed signal to digital to SOC, it eliminates the need for mutually exclusive testers. The Fusion HF test system offers the broadest range of leading-edge test capability in a single platform, including advanced mixed signal, high-speed digital, digital signal processing, RF wireless, embedded memory, power management, and time measurement. This range of instrumentation on a single platform allows semiconductor manufacturers to optimize their asset utilization, thereby increasing their manufacturing flexibility and lowering the overall cost of their testing processes. Fusion’s modular, open architecture has been designed so that it can keep pace with today’s rapid changes in test technology. As new generations of devices require more advanced test capabilities, customers can easily upgrade their Fusion testers to accommodate these requirements. Our Open Platform Program encourages third party development of instrumentation for Fusion to augment our internal development, thereby increasing flexibility and scalability.

Our Fusion HFi provides higher performance digital channels in a smaller footprint than the Fusion HF. Custom IC development has significantly reduced the component count required to implement the digital subsystem. This, coupled with state-of-the-art packaging and a new, modular integrated thermal

5

Table of Contents

management system, provides a reduction in board and interconnect count, thereby reducing the overall footprint of the tester. The complete range of instruments developed for the Fusion HF are also available for the Fusion HFi. The Fusion HFi preserves our customers’ investments in test programs and intellectual property, loadboards, design links, factory integration, and training through compatibility with current Fusion HF configurations while providing greater digital test capabilities.

Fusion CX and DX

The Fusion CX is a high-performance, lower cost Fusion system targeted primarily towards the testing of high-volume mixed signal devices. The mixed signal device technologies tested by Fusion CX are often the precursor to mixed signal technologies that will be incorporated into next generation SOC designs. Because Fusion CX uses the same enVision development software as Fusion HF, customers are able to upgrade their test capability to Fusion HF and HFi as the complexity of their next generation SOC devices require. The Fusion CX features up to 128 digital pins, mixed signal and RF test instruments, and power management test technology. Typical device types tested on Fusion CX include radio frequency/wireless such as 802.11b, power management and automotive devices.

Fusion DX extends the reach of Fusion to the desktop, offering complete ATE capabilities and the flexibility to be deployed at any point from design to production. Fusion DX can be integrated into other production equipment, including test systems, probers or handlers without use of additional floor space, and offers a wide range of capabilities, including full-featured digital and a broad line of mixed signal instruments. This powerful instrument set has been deployed to Fusion’s installed base, including numerous systems at subcontract test providers worldwide.

Service

Our worldwide service organization is capable of performing installations and all necessary maintenance of test systems sold by us, including routine servicing of components manufactured by third parties. We provide various parts and labor warranties on test systems or options designed and manufactured by us, and warranties on components that have been purchased from other manufacturers and incorporated into our test systems. We also provide training on the maintenance and operation of test systems we sell. Service revenue totaled $38.5 million, or 15.0% of net sales, in fiscal 2004, $32.1 million, or 26.8% of net sales, in fiscal 2003, and $34.4 million, or 28.3% of net sales, in fiscal 2002.

We offer a wide range of service contracts, which gives our customers the flexibility to select the maintenance program best suited to their needs. Customers may purchase service contracts which extend maintenance beyond the initial warranty provided. Many customers enter into annual or multiple-year service contracts over the life of the equipment. The pricing of contracts is based upon the level of service provided to the customer and the time period of the service contract. We believe that service revenues should be less affected by the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry than sales of test equipment. We maintain service centers around the world, both directly and through strategic alliances with companies that are located in Singapore, Japan, Korea and California.

Engineering and Product Development

The test equipment market is characterized by rapid technological change and new product introductions, as well as advancing industry standards. Our competitive position will depend upon our ability to successfully enhance the Fusion platform and develop new instrumentation, and to introduce these new products on a timely and cost-effective basis. We devote a significant portion of personnel and financial resources to the continued development of our single platform SOC capabilities, including embedded memory, digital and mixed signal core competencies. We also seek to maintain close relationships with our customers in order to be responsive to their product development and production needs. Our expenditures for engineering and product development were $67.7 million, $66.1 million and $71.1 million, during fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

6

Table of Contents

Our engineering strategy is to focus on development of the Fusion single test platform. We believe that our single-platform strategy is a more cost effective method of focusing research and design efforts, because we are able to avoid dilution of our development efforts across multiple product platforms. We also intend to develop our future test systems in an evolutionary manner so that they may be progressively upgraded. Together with our strategic alliances and our Open Platform Program this approach preserves our customers’ substantial investments in our pre-existing test systems and programs, and, in general, helps us maintain market acceptance for our test systems. We work closely with our customers to define new product features and to identify emerging applications for our products.

Sales and Distribution

We sell our products primarily through a worldwide direct sales organization. Our sales organization is structured around key accounts, with a sales force of 33 people. We use a small number of independent sales representatives and distributors in certain other regions of the world.

Our sales to customers outside the United States are primarily denominated in United States dollars. Sales outside North America were 66%, 57% and 52%, of total net sales in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Customers

Our customers include many of the world’s leading semiconductor device manufacturers. In fiscal year 2004, 2003 and 2002, Texas Instruments accounted for 58%, 58% and 45% of net sales, respectively. In fiscal year 2002, Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation accounted for 11% of net sales. Customers that have ordered Fusion products include the following:

Because a relatively small number of semiconductor companies purchase most of the world’s semiconductor test equipment and we have concentrated our sales and support efforts on such key customers, we believe that sales to a limited number of customers will continue to account for a high percentage of net sales for the foreseeable future.

Manufacturing and Supply

We have completed the transition of our final assembly, system integration and testing operations of our Fusion HF, HFi, CX and DX to Jabil Circuit. We outsource certain components and subassemblies to contract manufacturers, such as Sanmina-SCI Corporation. We use standard components and prefabricated parts manufactured to our specifications. These components and subassemblies are used to produce testers in configurations specified by our customers. Most of the components for our products are available from a number of different suppliers; however, certain components are purchased from a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers. Although we believe that all single source components currently are available in adequate amounts, we cannot be certain that shortages will not develop in the future. We are dependent on two semiconductor device manufacturers, Vitesse Semiconductor and Maxtech Components, who are sole source suppliers of custom components for our products. We have no written supply agreements with these sole source suppliers and

7

Table of Contents

purchase our custom components through individual purchase orders. We continuously evaluate sources for our custom components. We cannot assure you that such alternative sources will be qualified or available to us.

Our facilities in Westwood, Massachusetts and San Jose, California perform final customer acceptance testing on certain shipments and research and development activities, which include assembly, system integration and testing for prototypes.

Competition

Many other domestic and foreign companies participate in the markets for each of our products and the industry is highly competitive. We compete principally on the basis of performance, cost of test, reliability, customer service, applications support, price and ability to deliver our products on a timely basis. Our competitors in the market for test systems include Advantest, Agilent Technologies, Credence Systems, and Teradyne. These companies have a substantially larger share of our addressable market than we do and most of our other major competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do. Certain of these competitors have a larger installed base of equipment than we do. Each of our major competitors are suppliers of other types of automatic test equipment and also supply products to other markets. We expect our competitors to enhance their current products and they could introduce new products with comparable or better price and performance. In addition, new competitors, including semiconductor manufacturers themselves, may offer new technologies, which may in turn reduce the value of our product lines.

Backlog

At July 31, 2004, our backlog of unfilled orders for all products and services was $85.7 million, compared with $79 million at July 31, 2003. Historically, test systems generally ship within twelve months of receipt of a customer’s purchase order. While backlog is calculated on the basis of firm orders, orders may be subject to cancellation or delay by the customer with limited or no penalty. Our backlog at any particular date, therefore, is not necessarily indicative of actual sales which may be generated for any succeeding period. Historically, our backlog levels have fluctuated based upon the ordering patterns of our customers and changes in our manufacturing capacity.

Proprietary Rights

The development of our products is largely based on proprietary information. We rely upon a combination of contract provisions, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws to protect our proprietary rights in products. We also have a policy of seeking U.S. patents on technology considered of particular strategic importance. The earliest expiration date of any of our patents is March 2, 2010. Our other patents have later expiration dates and relate to various technologies, including technology relating to the Fusion system and pin electronics. Although we believe that the copyrights, trademarks and patents we own are of value, we believe that they will not determine our success, which depends principally upon our engineering applications, manufacturing, marketing and service skills. However, we intend to protect our rights when, in our view, these rights are infringed upon.

The use of patents to protect hardware and software has increased in the test equipment industry. We have at times been notified of claims that we may be infringing patents issued to others. Although there are no pending actions against us regarding any patents, no assurance can be given that infringement claims by third parties will not negatively impact our business and results of operations. As to any claims asserted against us, we may seek or be required to obtain a license under the third party’s intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance, however, that a license will be available under reasonable terms or at all. In addition, we could decide to resort to litigation to challenge such claims or a third party could resort to litigation to enforce such claims. Such litigation could be expensive and time consuming and could negatively impact our business and results of operations.

8

Table of Contents

Employees

At July 31, 2004, we employed 635 employees and 55 temporary workers. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we have experienced no work stoppages. Many of our employees are highly skilled, and we believe our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract and retain these employees. We consider relations with our employees to be good.

Environmental Affairs

Our manufacturing facilities are subject to numerous laws and regulations designed to protect the environment. We do not anticipate that compliance with these laws and regulations will have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

Item 2.    Properties

All of our facilities are leased. We have achieved worldwide ISO 9001:2000 certification at our facilities. We maintain our headquarters in Westwood, Massachusetts, where corporate administration, sales and customer support, research and development are located in a 167,500 square foot facility under a lease, which expires in 2009. We also maintain an additional facility in a 71,000 square foot building in San Jose, California. Our lease of this facility expires in 2007. We also lease sales and customer support offices at various locations in the United States totaling approximately 22,000 square feet. We have a total of seven leased properties in the United States, four in Asia and six in Europe.

As part of the acquisition of StepTech, Inc., we assumed leases on manufacturing and development facilities totaling 18,000 square feet in Hopkinton, Massachusetts. One facility of 6,000 square feet expired in March 2004, leaving a total of 12,000 square feet remaining under the assumed StepTech leases.

Our European headquarters is located in Woking, United Kingdom and our Asian headquarters is located in Singapore. We also maintain sales and support offices at other locations in Europe and in Asia. Office space leased in Asia and Europe totals approximately 68,500 square feet.

We believe that our existing facilities are adequate to meet our current and foreseeable future requirements.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

We have no material pending legal proceedings.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

There were no matters submitted to a vote of stockholders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

9

Table of Contents

PART II

Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “LTXX”. The following table shows the high and low closing sale prices per share of our common stock, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market, for the periods indicated:

We have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business and, therefore, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, our credit agreement with a bank contains certain covenants that prohibit us from paying cash dividends.

As of September 2, 2004, we had approximately 1,000 stockholders of record of our common stock.

Compensation Plans

The following table shows information relating to the Company’s compensation plans as of July 31, 2004:

*Includes 1,050,140 shares available for issuance under an employee stock purchase plan which is intended to qualify as such under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.

This table excludes an aggregate of 73,298 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options assumed by the Company in connection with the StepTech acquisition. The weighted average exercise price of the excluded options is $0.8488.

10

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

The following table contains our selected consolidated financial data and is qualified by the more detailed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. The selected consolidated financial data for and as of the end of each of the five fiscal years in the period ended July 31, 2004 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements.

11

Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. See “Business Risks”.

Overview

We design, manufacture, market and service semiconductor test solutions worldwide to leading companies in the semiconductor industry. Our Fusion semiconductor test equipment can test a broad range of analog, digital, mixed signal (a combination of analog and digital) and system-on-a-chip, or SOC, semiconductor devices, all on a single test platform.

LTX focuses its marketing and sales on integrated device manufacturers (IDMs), subcontractors, which perform manufacturing services for the semiconductor industry, foundries, which provide wafer manufacturing capability, and fabless companies, which design integrated circuits but have no manufacturing capability.

Industry Conditions and Outlook

We sell capital equipment and services to companies that design, manufacture, assemble or test semiconductor devices. The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical, causing in turn a cyclical impact on our financial results. As a capital equipment provider, our revenue is driven by the capital expenditure budgets and spending patterns of our customers, who often delay or accelerate purchases in reaction to variations in their business. The level of capital expenditures by these semiconductor companies depends on the current and anticipated market demand for semiconductor devices and the products that incorporate them. Therefore, demand for our semiconductor test equipment is dependent on growth in the semiconductor industry. In particular, three primary characteristics of the semiconductor industry drive the demand for semiconductor test equipment:

12

Table of Contents

Our operating results have been negatively impacted by a severe industry-wide slowdown in the semiconductor industry, which began to affect the semiconductor test industry in fiscal 2001 and continued through our fiscal year ended July 31, 2003. The industry entered a period of growth during our fiscal year ended July 31, 2004. The following graph shows the sharp decline in the three-month moving average semiconductor test equipment orders and shipments from fiscal 1997 through fiscal 2003 and the growth period of fiscal 2004, as calculated by SEMI, an industry trade organization:

Despite the sharp decline in business activity for the semiconductor test market we faced through the end of fiscal 2003, we continued to invest in the further development and enhancement of our Fusion platform. We believe that our competitive advantage in this industry is primarily driven by the ability of our Fusion platform to meet or exceed the highest technical specifications required for the testing of the most advanced semiconductor devices in a cost-efficient manner. Therefore, we continue to invest significant amounts in engineering and product development in an effort to further differentiate the Fusion platform from the product offerings of our competitors. In fiscal 2004, engineering and product development expenses were $67.7 million, or 26.4% of net sales, as compared to $66.1 million, or 55.3% of net sales in fiscal 2003. The $1.6 million increase in engineering and product development expenses in fiscal year 2004 from fiscal year 2003 was a result of expenditures to support new product features and emerging applications for our Fusion HFi and CX products due to increased sales for these products. We believe that our single-platform product strategy is a more cost-efficient means of focusing product research and development efforts, since we are able to avoid dilution of our development efforts across multiple product platforms.

Additionally, because in the past a high proportion of our manufacturing costs included in cost of sales have been fixed, we have been limited in our ability to reduce manufacturing expenses and inventory purchases quickly in response to decreases in orders and revenues during cyclical downturns in the semiconductor industry. In order to continue our strategy of investing in product research and development during a downturn while mitigating the adverse effect on profitability, we have taken steps to transform certain historically fixed manufacturing overhead costs into variable costs. Over the past several years, we have increasingly transitioned the manufacture of certain components and subassemblies to contract manufacturers, thereby reducing our fixed manufacturing costs associated with direct labor and overhead. In fiscal 2002, we completed the transition of our final assembly, system integration and testing operations for Fusion HF to Jabil Circuit, and in fiscal 2004, we completed the transition of our Fusion HFi, CX and DX manufacturing to Jabil Circuit, which will further reduce

13

Table of Contents

our fixed manufacturing costs. We believe that transforming product manufacturing costs into variable costs will in the future allow us to improve our performance during cyclical downturns while preserving our historic gross margins during cyclical upturns.

During the sluggish industry conditions through the end of fiscal 2003, we also took several additional cost reduction measures to further mitigate the adverse effect of cyclical downturns on our profitability. Our total worldwide headcount was reduced from 776 employees and 56 temporary workers at the end of fiscal 2002 to 576 employees and 35 temporary workers at the end of fiscal 2003. In addition, we continued to maintain other cost reduction measures, such as the suspension of 401(k) matching payments, a freeze in salary and wage increases and the strict oversight and reduction in discretionary travel and other overhead expenses. We believe that these reductions in operating costs have reduced our fixed costs while preserving our ability to fund critical product research and development efforts and continue to provide our customers with the levels of responsiveness and service they require.

The Company has seen sequential revenue improvement in each of the past six quarters and was profitable in the third and fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. Management believes that our industry has been in a growth cycle for several quarters based upon the recent improvement in business activity, industry forecasts and other industry indicators, which began to improve at the end of fiscal 2003. During this period, the Company’s orders increased sequentially through its third quarter ending April 30, 2004. In order to support new customer wins and improving business conditions, the Company increased its total worldwide headcount at the end of fiscal 2004 to 635 employees and 56 temporary workers. However, in the fourth quarter, orders were down 15% from the third quarter, and we cannot predict whether this slowdown in orders is a pause in the growth cycle we experienced in fiscal 2004 or the beginning of the next cyclical downturn in our industry. In reaction to the current business conditions, on September 14, 2004, we took action to reduce our worldwide headcount by approximately 11%, eliminating 74 positions. If the slowdown in orders continues or accelerates in fiscal 2005, we could experience lower than anticipated order levels, cancellations of orders in backlog, extended customer delivery requirements or pricing pressure. At the relatively lower levels of business we are experiencing as we enter fiscal 2005, there is a higher likelihood that changes in our customers’ requirements would adversely affect our results of operations because in any particular quarter a limited number of transactions accounts for an even greater portion of sales for the quarter.

We are also exposed to the risks associated with the current emerging recovery in the U.S. and global economies. The lack of visibility regarding whether or when there will be a sustained recovery in the sale of electronic goods and information technology equipment, and uncertainty regarding the magnitude of the recovery, underscores the need for caution in predicting growth in the semiconductor test equipment industry in general and in our revenues and profits specifically. Slow or negative growth in the domestic economy may continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations for the foreseeable future.

Critical Accounting Policies and the Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We based these estimates and assumptions on historical experience, and evaluate them on an on-going basis to ensure they remain reasonable under current conditions. Actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe that our most critical accounting policies upon which our financial condition depends on and which involve the most complex and subjective decisions or assessments are as follows: revenue recognition, inventory reserve, income taxes, warranty, goodwill and other intangibles, in process research and development, impairment of long-lived assets and allowances for doubtful accounts.

14

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenue recognition policy is described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, contained in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. We monitor the credit worthiness of our key customers and do not record revenue on sales if collection is not reasonably assured. Most of these conditions are subjective and actual results could vary from the estimated outcome, requiring future revisions to income from operations. In the future, if acceptance provisions significantly change, the timing of the revenue recognition could be affected.

Inventory Reserve

We sell capital equipment to companies that design, manufacture, assemble, and test semiconductor devices. We are exposed to a number of economic and industry factors that could result in portions of our inventory becoming either obsolete or in excess of anticipated usage. These factors include, but are not limited to, changes in our customers’ capital expenditures, technological changes in our markets, our ability to meet changing customer requirements, competitive pressures in products and prices, and the availability of key components from our suppliers. Our policy is to establish inventory reserves when conditions exist that suggest our inventory may be in excess of anticipated demand or is obsolete based upon our assumptions about future demand for our products or market conditions. We regularly evaluate the ability to realize the value of our inventory based on a combination of factors including the following: historical usage rates, forecasted sales or usage, estimated product end of life dates, estimated current and future market values and new product introductions. Purchasing and alternative usage options are also explored to mitigate inventory exposure. When recorded, our reserves are intended to reduce the carrying value of our inventory to its net realizable value. Pursuant to SAB Topic 5-BB, inventory reserves establish a new cost basis for inventory. Such reserves are not reversed until the related inventory is sold or otherwise disposed of. During fiscal 2004, the Company had no reversals of reserves related to the sale of previously written down items. As of July 31, 2004, our inventory of $69.2 million is stated net of inventory reserves of $78.9 million. If actual demand for our products deteriorates or market conditions are less favorable than those that we project, additional inventory reserves may be required.

Income Taxes

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”, (“SFAS No. 109”) the Company recognizes deferred income taxes based on the expected future tax consequences of differences between the financial statement bases and the tax bases of assets and liabilities, calculated using enacted tax rates for the year in which the differences are expected to be reflected in the tax return. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred taxes to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company has deferred tax assets resulting from tax credit carryforwards, net operating losses and other deductible temporary differences, which will reduce taxable income in future periods. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is “more likely than not” that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered, including a company’s performance, the market environment in which the Company operates, length of carryback and carryforward periods, existing sales backlog and future sales projections. We had previously provided valuation allowances only for future tax benefits resulting from certain foreign losses and various state tax attributes. However, where there are cumulative losses in recent years, SFAS No. 109 creates a strong presumption that a valuation allowance is needed. This presumption can be overcome in very limited circumstances. As a result of our cumulative loss position at July 31, 2002 and the increased uncertainty relative to the timing of profitability in future periods, we concluded that it was appropriate to establish a valuation allowance for our entire net deferred tax assets. The Company established a full valuation allowance for our remaining deferred tax assets and recognized a $78.8 million non-cash charge during fiscal year 2002. As a result, the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets increased from $101.6 million at July 31, 2002, to $164.0 million at July 31, 2003 and to

15

Table of Contents

$168.7 million at July 31, 2004. We expect to record a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits until we can sustain an appropriate level of profitability and until such time, we would not expect to recognize any significant tax benefits in our future results of operations. We will continue to monitor the recoverability of our deferred tax asset on a periodic basis.

Warranty

The Company provides standard warranty coverage on its systems, providing labor and parts necessary to repair the systems during the warranty period. The Company accounts for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to cost of sales when the revenue is recognized. The estimated warranty cost is based on historical product performance and field expenses. The Company uses actual service hours and parts expense per system and applies the actual labor and overhead rates to estimate the warranty charge. The actual product performance and/or field expense profiles may differ, and in those cases the Company adjusts warranty accruals accordingly.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized. Intangible assets with a definite useful life are amortized over their estimated useful life. Assets recorded in these categories are tested for impairment at least annually or when a change in circumstances may result in future impairment. Intangible assets are recorded at historical cost. Intangible assets acquired in an acquisition, including research and development, are recorded using the purchase method of accounting. Assets acquired in an acquisition are recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. If the carrying value of the asset is in excess of the present value of the expected future cash flows, the carrying value is written down to fair value in the period identified.

In-Process Research and Development

The purchase price recorded for acquisitions is allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on fair values at the date of acquisition. The estimated excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible assets is allocated to identifiable intangible assets. The income approach is used to determine the fair value of In-Process Research and Development (IPR&D).

Under the income approach, the fair value reflects the present value of the projected earnings that will be generated by the in-process projects if successfully completed. The income approach focuses on the income producing capability of the acquired in-process projects and best represents the present value of the future economic benefits expected to be derived from these projects. The IPR&D projects must also meet the following criteria: qualify as research and development; no alternative future use; high degree of uncertainty about the future benefits; and, project is in research and development stage and not completed.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

On an ongoing basis, we review the value and period of amortization or depreciation of long-lived assets. Included in long-lived assets is machinery, equipment, spare parts used for service, office furniture, office equipment and leasehold improvements. During the review, we reevaluate the significant assumptions used in determining the original cost of long-lived assets. Although the assumptions may vary from transaction to transaction, they generally include revenue growth, operating results, cash flows and other indicators of value. We then determine whether there has been a permanent impairment of the value of long-lived assets based upon events or circumstances that have occurred since acquisition. The extent of the impairment amount recognized is based upon a determination of the fair value of the impaired asset.

16

Table of Contents

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

A majority of our trade receivables are derived from sales to large multinational semiconductor manufacturers throughout the world. In order to monitor potential credit losses, we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for potential credit losses based upon assessment of the expected collectibility of all accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed periodically to assess the adequacy of the allowances. In any circumstances in which we are aware of a customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations, we take a certain percentage of the accounts receivable balance as an allowance, which is based on the age of the receivables, the circumstances surrounding the customer’s financial situation and our historical experience. If circumstances change, and the financial condition of our customers were adversely affected resulting in their inability to meet their financial obligations to us, we may need to take additional allowances.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated statements of operations data.

17

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the principal items included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as percentages of total net sales.

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003

Net Sales.    Net sales consist of both semiconductor test equipment and related hardware and software support and maintenance services, net of returns and allowances. Net sales were $255.8 million in fiscal 2004 and $119.4 million in fiscal 2003. The increase in net sales is primarily a result of increasing demand for semiconductor test equipment as economic conditions in general and semiconductor industries in particular improved for fiscal 2004. The increase in net sales is also attributed to expanding business with new and existing customers, across a diverse range of end products and SOC applications. Sales from new products, Fusion CX and Fusion HFi, totaled $107.0 million in fiscal year 2004 and $14.2 million in fiscal year 2003. Service revenue, consisting of sales of replacement and spare parts and labor charges, totaled $38.5 million, or 15.0% of net sales, in fiscal 2004 and $32.1 million, or 26.8% of net sales, in fiscal 2003. Geographically, sales to customers outside the United States were $168.9 million, or 66% of net sales, in fiscal 2004 and $67.8 million, or 57% of net sales, in fiscal 2003.

Cost of Sales.    Cost of sales consists of material, outsource manufacturing costs, labor, depreciation and associated overhead. Cost of sales increased by $57.3 million to $154.7 million in fiscal 2004 from $97.4 million in fiscal 2003. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales was 60.5% of net sales in fiscal 2004 as compared to 81.5% in fiscal 2003. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales decreased 21.0% year over year in fiscal 2004 primarily as a result of increased sales volume, as the fixed cost components of our cost of sales did not increase commensurate with our increase in net sales, as well as increased sales of Fusion HFi and Fusion CX, which have higher gross margin than Fusion HF.

Engineering and Product Development Expenses.    Engineering and product development expenses were $67.7 million, or 26.4% of net sales, in fiscal 2004 as compared to $66.1 million, or 55.3% of net sales, in fiscal 2003. The $1.6 million increase in engineering and product development expenses in 2004 from 2003 was principally a result of an increase of $1.0 million in our applications development staffing levels to support market penetration programs and a $0.6 million increase in non-recurring engineering expenses for next generation digital pin development. We continue to maintain a significant investment in product development expenses to support new product features and emerging applications.

18

Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses were $28.0 million, or 11.0% of net sales, in fiscal 2004 as compared to $27.3 million, or 22.9% of net sales, in fiscal 2003. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses as percentage of net sales was a result of increased sales volume.

Interest Expense.    Interest expense for fiscal year 2004 was $6.6 million as compared to $6.7 million for fiscal year 2003 and consists primarily of accruing interest expense for the balance of the 4.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes.

Investment Income.    Investment income was $3.2 million for fiscal 2004 as compared to $4.3 million for fiscal 2003. The decrease in investment income is due to declining interest rates in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003.

Income Tax.    The Company recorded no income tax provision for fiscal year 2004 due to the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards to offset taxable income. As a result of a review undertaken at July 31, 2004 and our cumulative loss position at that date, management concluded that it was appropriate to maintain a full valuation allowance for the Company’s net deferred tax assets. The Company recorded a $2.0 million pretax profit for fiscal year 2004. The income tax expense associated with this profit was offset by use of a portion of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards. The Company recorded a 100% valuation allowance and had no net tax provision in fiscal 2004. The Company will continue to record a 100% valuation allowance until it is more likely than not we will utilize the deferred tax asset. The gross deferred tax asset is valued at $169 million as of July 31, 2004 with a 100% valuation allowance resulting in no net deferred tax assets recorded on the balance sheet.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002

Net Sales.    Net sales consist of both semiconductor test equipment and related hardware and software support and maintenance services, net of returns and allowances. Net sales were $119.4 million in 2003 and $121.3 million in 2002. The decrease in sales in 2003 from 2002 was the result of the continuing sluggish demand for semiconductors, resulting in reduced demand for semiconductor test equipment. Sales revenue began to decline in the second half of fiscal year 2001 and has continued to remain at low levels throughout fiscal years 2002 and 2003. Despite the negative factors and depressed global economy, we continued to invest in Fusion with significant investment in engineering and development expenses in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001. Sales from new products, Fusion CX and Fusion HFi totaled $14.2 million in fiscal year 2003 and $1.2 million in fiscal year 2002. Fusion CX was introduced in fiscal 2002 and Fusion HFi was introduced in late fiscal 2003. Our service revenue is less impacted by significant swings in product demand as most of the revenue is derived from an installed base of existing products. Service revenue, consisting of sales of replacement and spare parts and labor charges, totaled $32.1 million, or 26.8% of net sales, in fiscal 2003 and $34.4 million, or 28.3% of net sales, in fiscal 2002. Geographically, sales to customers outside the United States were $67.8 million, or 57% of net sales, in fiscal 2003 and $63.5 million, or 52% of net sales, in fiscal 2002.

Cost of Sales.    Cost of sales consists of material, outsource manufacturing costs, labor, depreciation and associated overhead. Cost of sales increased by $1.4 million to $97.4 million in fiscal 2003 from $96.0 million in fiscal 2002. As a percentage of net sales, cost of sales was 81.5% of net sales in fiscal 2003 as compared to 79.2% in fiscal 2002. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales increased slightly year-over-year in fiscal 2003 primarily due to changes in product mix.

Inventory Related Provision.    In calendar 2001, we were faced with a sudden drop in demand as a result of the beginning phases of an industry-wide slowdown, which has continued through and into our fiscal year 2003. During fiscal year 2002, we recorded a $42.2 million excess inventory related provision, principally due to the sharp decline in semiconductor test system orders and overall industry wide conditions. The reserve established in fiscal 2002 considered industry forecasts, and a modest but temporary improved order environment in the

19

Table of Contents

second half of fiscal 2002. This led to an expectation of some recovery during fiscal 2003, which in fact did not materialize. Continued sluggish worldwide macro-economic conditions, combined with world events such as the war in Iraq and the SARS epidemic, led to depressed conditions for a longer period than past industry cycles and earlier projections. In fact, the semiconductor capital equipment industry was in the third year of the most significant industry wide slowdown on record.

The major variables impacting inventory usage are the demand for current products, overall industry conditions, key sales initiatives and the impact that our new product introductions (Fusion HFi and Fusion CX) have on current product demand, which we evaluate on a quarterly basis. The longer the duration of the depressed industry conditions, the greater the chance for impairment of our current products due to market and product transitions. Fusion HFi was formally introduced in the third quarter of fiscal year 2003. The HFi is a higher performance machine with significant added capability and reduced maintenance cost. As part of our normal quarterly excess and obsolescence inventory review, we evaluated the impact on our reserve calculation should the current overall industry conditions continue, along with the new variable of introducing Fusion HFi. With the growing acceptance for Fusion HFi, we determined that it was appropriate to take a $48.5 million inventory provision related primarily to excess Fusion HF raw materials and component parts in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.

When recorded, our reserves are intended to reduce the carrying value of our inventory to its net realizable value. Pursuant to SAB Topic 5-BB, inventory reserves establish a new cost basis for inventory. Such reserves are not reversed until the related inventory is sold or otherwise disposed of. During fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, we disposed of $11.1 million and $9.5 million respectively, against inventory reserves established in fiscal 2002. There was no impact on reported profit margins in either period. The Company reviews and disposes of reserved inventory on an ongoing basis, as appropriate. Excess inventory that has been reserved is held for potential future use which is dependent on overall market conditions and product demand.

Engineering and Product Development Expenses.    Engineering and product development expenses were $66.1 million, or 55.3% of net sales, in fiscal 2003 as compared to $71.1 million, or 58.6% of net sales, in fiscal 2002. The $5.0 million decrease in engineering and product development expenses in 2003 from 2002 was a result of the completion of next generation Fusion development projects. Sales from new products, Fusion HFi and Fusion CX, totaled $14.2 million in fiscal year 2003 and $1.2 million in fiscal year 2002. Fusion HFi was introduced in late fiscal 2003 and Fusion CX was introduced in fiscal 2002.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.    Selling, general and administrative expenses were $27.3 million, or 22.9% of net sales, in fiscal 2003 as compared to $28.3 million, or 23.4% of net sales, in fiscal 2002. The significant decreases from fiscal 2001 levels in fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 were primarily a result of cost cutting measures such as headcount reductions, elimination of profit bonuses, lower commission expenses due to lower sales volume and elimination of our 401(k) match.

In-Process Research and Development.    In October 2000, we acquired 19% of the outstanding common stock of StepTech, Inc. On June 10, 2003, we acquired the remaining 81% of the outstanding shares of StepTech for a net cash payment of $6.5 million and 2,283,750 shares of LTX common stock, of which 288,125 shares were contingent upon certain milestones being met. In addition, all outstanding stock options to purchase shares of StepTech stock were converted into options to purchase 263,112 shares of LTX stock and options to purchase 300,000 shares of LTX stock with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of LTX stock on the date of grant were also issued. The acquisition was accounted for under the provisions of SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations be accounted for under the purchase method. The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements include the operating results of StepTech from the date of acquisition. The purchase price recorded for the StepTech acquisition has been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based on their fair value at the date of acquisition. The estimated excess of purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible assets was allocated to identifiable intangible assets. We recorded an in-process research and development (IPR&D) charge of $16.1 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003.

20

Table of Contents

Prior to this acquisition, StepTech had been developing three new products that would address new end markets. These products under development were designed to test higher performance, higher pin count devices beyond the range of the current product offerings and to provide solutions in the module test segment market.

In arriving at the valuation of the purchased IPR&D, the Company considered several factors including, the projects stage of completion, the technological complexity of the work completed, the costs incurred, the expected costs to complete, the contribution of core technologies and other acquired assets, the expected completion date and the estimated economic life of the project. The after-tax cash flows attributable to each project were discounted back to a present value using discount rates considered typical venture capital rates of return for a product/service prototype with some proven capabilities, further development required and positive net cash flows projected to be within a few years. The three projects had no alternative future use and ranged from 35% to 60% complete as of the acquisition date. The expected completion dates are within two years and the Company will absorb the remaining cost to complete each project within the Company’s current cost structure. The Company believes that the estimated amounts recorded as purchased IPR&D represent the fair value at the date of acquisition and do not exceed the amount a third party would pay for these projects.

Reorganization Costs.    Reorganization costs were $6.7 million, or 5.6% of net sales, in fiscal 2003. In August 2002, we reduced our workforce by 94 employees due to adverse business conditions. In November 2002, we further reduced our workforce by 195 employees and contractors. The combination of these two actions represent $5.6 million of the $6.7 million charge for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003. These workforce reductions have reduced annual selling, general and administrative expenses and engineering and product development expenses by approximately $5.0 million and $16.0 million, respectively. Most of the future savings is from reduced payroll costs. Non-payroll expense reductions are expected to be approximately $3.0 million per year due to reduced future operating and non-recurring engineering expenses. These consist primarily of lower operating expenses associated with reduced headcount and further cost reductions in non-recurring engineering expenditures. In addition, we have instituted several other cost reduction measures, such as the suspension of 401(k) matching payments, a freeze in salary and wage increases and strict oversight and reduction in discretionary travel and other overhead expenses. We believe that these reductions in operating costs have reduced our fixed costs while preserving our ability to fund critical product research and development efforts and continuing to provide our customers with the levels of responsiveness and service they require. The majority of the severance costs of the August 2002 and November 2002 workforce reductions were paid by April 30, 2003, although some costs were paid through August 2003.

In July 2003, we reduced our headcount by 7 employees and recorded a $0.3 million reorganization cost charge in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. The majority of the severance cost from this workforce reduction was paid during the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2004. In July 2003, we also recorded a $0.8 million asset impairment charge for write-off of certain manufacturing related leasehold improvements in our Westwood facility. These assets were deemed to be impaired as a result of outsourcing the remaining test and integration process to Jabil Circuit.

Interest Expense.    Interest expense for fiscal year 2003 was $6.7 million as compared to $6.8 million for fiscal year 2002 and consists primarily of accruing interest expense for the 4.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes.

Investment Income.    Investment income was $4.3 million for fiscal 2003 as compared to $7.0 million for fiscal 2002. The decrease in investment income is due to a lower cash and marketable securities balances in fiscal 2003 as compared to fiscal 2002.

Income Tax.    The Company had no net tax provision in fiscal year 2003 as compared to a tax provision of $33.7 million, or 27.8% of net sales, in fiscal year 2002. The provision in fiscal 2002 was the result of providing a full valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets by recognizing a tax provision charge. Prior to fiscal 2002, the Company had previously provided valuation allowances only for certain foreign losses and

21

Table of Contents

various state taxes. As a result of a review undertaken at July 31, 2002 and our cumulative loss position at that date, management concluded that it was appropriate to establish a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets. The Company will continue to record a 100% valuation allowance until it is more likely than not we will utilize the deferred tax asset. The gross deferred tax asset was valued at $164 million as of July 31, 2003 with a 100% valuation allowance resulting in no net deferred tax assets recorded on the balance sheet.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At July 31, 2004, we had $244.7 million in cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities and working capital of $292.9 million as compared to $136.6 million in cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities and working capital of $155.9 million at July 31, 2003. The increase in the cash and cash equivalents was due primarily to cash provided by operations of $11.8 million and cash provided by financing activities of $113.6 million, which was partially offset by cash used in investing activities of $103.7 million. The total increase in cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities for the year was $108.1 million, which consisted of $126.5 million from our February 2004 equity offering, reduced by a $19.5 million payment on our short term working capital line of credit.

Accounts receivable from trade customers was $33.0 million at July 31, 2004, as compared to $12.0 million at July 31, 2003. The principal reason for the $21.0 million increase in accounts receivable is a result of increased sales revenue volume. Sales for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 were $80.4 million as compared to $33.7 million for the fourth quarter ended July 31, 2003. The Company has seen significant improvement in general business conditions and payment patterns from the Asian subcontract market. Additionally, the Company has been able to secure letter of credit arrangements with several accounts previously on open accounts. Accordingly, the allowance for sales returns and doubtful accounts decreased to $2.0 million, or 5.8% of gross trade accounts receivable, at July 31, 2004 from $3.5 million, or 22.6% of gross trade accounts receivable at July 31, 2003. The Company has an agreement with its commercial lender that allows the Company to sell certain of its accounts receivable to the lender without recourse. There were no sales under this agreement for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004 and sales for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003 totaled $6.1 million. Accounts receivable that would be considered for sale to the Company’s commercial lender generally are for test systems shipped to a customer during the last few days of the quarter and which have collection terms of net 30 days.

Accounts receivable from other sources increased $6.3 million to $11.5 million at July 31, 2004, as compared to $5.2 million at July 31, 2003. The increase was attributed to the increase in the sale of component inventory at cost to our outsource suppliers. The Company sells raw materials and component inventory at cost to its outsource contract manufacturers. LTX has changed its manufacturing model from an internal manufacturing model to a completely outsourced one. During the transition, we are selling our in-stock inventory to our outsource manufacturers on an as-needed basis to build finished product for us. We will continue to sell our in-stock components to our outsource suppliers until we liquidate our inventories. At that point, the outsource suppliers will buy the raw materials and components from third parties and not from LTX. Terms of sale are typically net 30 days and there are no recourse provisions associated with these sales. The Company does not recognize revenue from these sales.

Net inventory increased by $2.3 million to $69.2 million at July 31, 2004 as compared to $66.9 million at July 31, 2003. The change in inventory is as a result of increasing demand for our new Fusion products from new or existing customers on a consignment or evaluation basis. In fiscal year 2004, LTX made a strategic decision to increase evaluation system activity at specific target customers in order to win new business and gain market share. Systems installed at customers on an evaluation basis are not booked as revenue until final customer acceptance.

Capital expenditures totaled $17.5 million in fiscal 2004, which was the same capital spending rate in absolute dollars as fiscal year 2003, but lower as a percentage of sales revenue. Capital spending in fiscal 2004 was 6.8% of sales revenue compared to 14.6% in fiscal 2003. The capital expenditures for fiscal year 2004 and fiscal 2003 related to increased staffing levels and activity from our applications development group and increased levels of spare parts to support our two new products, Fusion HFi and Fusion CX.

22

Table of Contents

For fiscal years 2004 and 2003, we had no new capital lease financing transactions. We had no new operating lease financing transactions in fiscal year 2004 and had one new operating lease financing transaction that generated $9.2 million of cash proceeds in fiscal year 2003. This transaction consisted of certain equipment sale/leaseback transactions to finance the cost of new test equipment. The cash proceeds from this transaction was based on the fair market value of the equipment and the leases qualify as an operating lease in accordance with SFAS No. 13. Cash proceeds received in excess of the cost of the equipment are recorded as a deferred gain in accordance with SFAS No. 28, paragraph 2 and SFAS No. 13, paragraph 33 and amortized over the life of the lease.

In January 2004, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 to register up to $250 million of common stock, debt securities and warrants. On February 19, 2004, an offering was closed pursuant to the registration statement relating to the sale of 8,050,000 shares of common stock at $16.50 per share. The offering included 1,050,000 shares sold as a result of the exercise, in full, by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares of common stock. Gross proceeds from the stock offering totaled approximately $132.8 million. Proceeds to LTX, net of $6.3 million in underwriters’ commissions and discounts and other expenses, totaled approximately $126.5 million.

During the quarter ended October 31, 2003, we renegotiated our domestic credit facility with our existing lender. The facility is comprised of a working capital line of $30.0 million, which is secured by all assets and bears interest at the bank’s prime rate. The working capital line is used to support working capital obligations, issuance of standby letters of credit, and foreign exchange transactions and to support the purchase of fixed assets. The facility imposes certain financial and other covenants. The Company has a second credit facility with another lender for a revolving credit line of $20.0 million. This facility is secured by cash and bears interest (at our option) at either: (i) the greater of the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or the bank’s prime rate, in each case, minus 1.0% or (ii) LIBOR plus 0.4%. No amounts were outstanding under these credit facilities at July 31, 2004. The Company repaid $19.5 million of its outstanding short term working capital loan with a portion of the proceeds received from the February 2004 equity offering.

In August 2001, we received net proceeds of $145.2 million from a private placement of 4.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes (the “Notes”) due 2006. The private placement was effected through a Rule 144A offering to qualified institutional buyers. Interest on the Notes is payable on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing February 15, 2002. The Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at any time prior to the close of business on August 15, 2006, unless previously redeemed, at a conversion price of $29.04 per share, subject to certain adjustments. Prior to August 19, 2004, we may redeem any of the Notes at a certain redemption price, plus accrued interest, if the closing price of the common stock has exceeded 150% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in any consecutive 30-day trading period and certain other conditions are satisfied. On or after August 19, 2004, we may redeem any of the Notes at designated redemption prices, plus accrued interest. The Notes are unsecured and subordinated in right of payment in full to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company. Expenses associated with the offering of approximately $4.8 million are being amortized using the straight-line method of depreciation, which approximates the effective interest method, over the term of the Notes.

The Company may from time to time seek to retire certain amounts, which may be material, of its outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, the Company’s liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors.

The Company operates in a highly cyclical industry and we may experience, with relatively short notice, significant fluctuations in demand for our products. This could result in a material effect on our liquidity position. To mitigate the risk, we have completed a substantial and lengthy process of converting our manufacturing process to an outsource model. As such, we believe we can react to a downturn or a significant upturn much faster than in the past. We believe that our balances of cash and cash equivalents, cash flows

23

Table of Contents

expected to be generated by future operating activities, our ready access to capital markets for competitively priced instruments and funds available under our credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements over the next twelve to twenty-four months.

The following summarizes LTX’s contractual obligations, net of sub-lease revenues, at July 31, 2004 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on its liquidity and cash flow in the future periods:

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2003, the SEC issued SAB 104, “Revenue Recognition”, which codifies, revises and rescinds certain sections of SAB 101, “Revenue Recognition”, in order to make this interpretive guidance consistent with current authoritative accounts and audit guidance and SEC rules and regulations. The changes noted in SAB 104 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretations No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51, which addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities (VIEs) either: (1) that do not have sufficient equity investment or risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (2) in which the equity investors lack an essential characteristic of a controlling financial interest. In December 2003, the FASB completed deliberations of proposed modifications to FIN 46 (Revised Interpretations) resulting in multiple effective dates based on the nature as well as the creation date of the VIE. VIEs created after January 31, 2003, but prior to January 1, 2004, may be accounted for either based on the original Interpretation or the Revised Interpretations. However, the Revised Interpretations must be applied no later than the end of the third quarter of fiscal year 2004. There has been no impact on the Company’s financial statements from the adoption of FIN 46.

BUSINESS RISKS

This report includes or incorporates forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties and fall within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify these forward-looking statements by our use of the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “intends,” “estimates,” and similar expressions, whether in the negative or affirmative. We cannot guarantee that we actually will achieve these plans, intentions or expectations. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important factors in the cautionary statements, particularly under the heading “Business Risks,” that we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements that we make. We do not assume any obligation to update any forward-looking statement we make.

Our sole market is the highly cyclical semiconductor industry, which causes a cyclical impact on our financial results.

We sell capital equipment to companies that design, manufacture, assemble, and test semiconductor devices. The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical, causing in turn a cyclical impact on our financial results. Our

24

Table of Contents

recent operating results have been negatively impacted by an industry-wide slowdown in the semiconductor industry which began to impact us in the latter half of the second quarter of fiscal 2001. Any failure to expand in cycle upturns to meet customer demand and delivery requirements or contract in cycle downturns at a pace consistent with cycles in the industry could have an adverse effect on our business.

Any significant downturn in the markets for our customers’ semiconductor devices or in general economic conditions would likely result in a reduction in demand for our products and would hurt our business. From the third quarter of fiscal 2001 through the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2004, our revenue and operating results were negatively impacted by a sudden and severe downturn in the semiconductor industry. Downturns in the semiconductor test equipment industry have been characterized by diminished product demand, excess production capacity, accelerated erosion of selling prices and excessive inventory levels. We believe the markets for newer generations of devices, including system-on-a-chip (“SOC”), will also experience similar characteristics. Our market is also characterized by rapid technological change and changes in customer demand. In the past, we have experienced delays in commitments, delays in collecting accounts receivable and significant declines in demand for our products during these downturns, and we cannot be certain that we will be able to maintain or exceed our current level of sales.

Additionally, as a capital equipment provider, our revenue is driven by the capital expenditure budgets and spending patterns of our customers who often delay or accelerate purchases in reaction to variations in their businesses. Because a high proportion of our costs are fixed, we are limited in our ability to reduce expenses and inventory purchases quickly in response to decreases in orders and revenues. In a contraction, we may not be able to reduce our significant fixed costs, such as continued investment in research and development and capital equipment requirements and materials purchases from our suppliers.

The market for semiconductor test equipment is highly concentrated, and we have limited opportunities to sell our products.

The semiconductor industry is highly concentrated, and a small number of semiconductor device manufacturers and contract assemblers account for a substantial portion of the purchases of semiconductor test equipment generally, including our test equipment. Sales to Texas Instruments accounted for 58% of our net sales in fiscal 2004, 58% of our net sales in fiscal 2003 and 45% of our net sales in fiscal 2002. Sales to our ten largest customers accounted for 87.5% of revenues in fiscal year 2004 and 83.4% in fiscal year 2003. Our customers may cancel orders with few or no penalties. If a major customer reduces orders for any reason, our revenues, operating results, and financial condition will be hurt.

Our ability to increase our sales will depend in part upon our ability to obtain orders from new customers. Semiconductor manufacturers select a particular vendor’s test system for testing the manufacturer’s new generations of devices and make substantial investments to develop related test program software and interfaces. Once a manufacturer has selected one test system vendor for a generation of devices, that manufacturer is more likely to purchase test systems from that vendor for that generation of devices, and, possibly, subsequent generations of devices as well. Therefore, the opportunities to obtain orders from new customers may be limited.

Our sales and operating results have fluctuated significantly from period to period, including from one quarter to another, and they may continue to do so.

Our quarterly and annual operating results are affected by a wide variety of factors that could adversely affect sales or profitability or lead to significant variability in our operating results or our stock price. This may be caused by a combination of factors, including the following:

25

Table of Contents

We cannot predict the impact of these and other factors on our sales and operating results in any future period. Results of operations in any period, therefore, should not be considered indicative of the results to be expected for any future period. Because of this difficulty in predicting future performance, our operating results may fall below expectations of securities analysts or investors in some future quarter or quarters. Our failure to meet these expectations would likely adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

A substantial amount of the shipments of our test systems for a particular quarter occur late in the quarter. Our shipment pattern exposes us to significant risks in the event of problems during the complex process of final integration, test and acceptance prior to shipment. If we were to experience problems of this type late in our quarter, shipments could be delayed and our operating results could fall below expectations.

We depend on Jabil Circuit to produce and test our family of Fusion products, and any failures or other problems at or with Jabil could cause us to lose customers and revenues.

We have selected Jabil Circuit, Inc. to manufacture our Fusion test systems. If for any reason Jabil cannot provide us with these products and services in a timely fashion, or at all, whether due to labor shortage, slow down or stoppage, deteriorating financial or business conditions or any other reason, we would not be able to sell or ship our Fusion family of products to our customers. All of the products Jabil tests and assembles for us are assembled in one facility in Massachusetts. If this facility were to become unable to meet our production requirements, transitioning assembly to an alternative Jabil facility could result it production delays of several weeks or more. We have no written supply agreement with Jabil. We also may be unable to engage alternative production and testing services on a timely basis or upon terms favorable to us, if at all. This relationship with Jabil may not result in a reduction of our fixed expenses.

We also may be unable to engage alternative production and testing services on a timely basis or upon terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are required for any reason to seek a new manufacturer of our test systems, an alternate manufacturer may not be available and, in any event, transitioning to a new manufacturer would require a significant lead time of six months or more and would involve substantial expense and disruption of our business. Our test systems are highly sophisticated and complex capital equipment, with many custom components, and require specific technical know-how and expertise. These factors could make it more difficult for us to find a new manufacturer of our test systems if our relationship with Jabil is terminated for any reason, which would cause us to lose revenues and customers.

26

Table of Contents

Future acquisitions may be difficult to integrate, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value or divert management attention.

We have in the past, and may in the future, seek to acquire or invest in additional complementary businesses, products, technologies or engineers. For example, in June 2003, we completed our acquisition of StepTech, Inc. We may have to issue debt or equity securities to pay for future acquisitions, which could be dilutive to then current stockholders. We have also incurred and may continue to incur certain liabilities or other expenses in connection with acquisitions, which could continue to materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Mergers and acquisitions of high-technology companies are inherently risky, and no assurance can be given that future acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition. Our past and future acquisitions may involve many risks, including:

Any of the events described in the foregoing paragraphs could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Our dependence on subcontractors and sole source suppliers may prevent us from delivering an acceptable product on a timely basis.

We rely on subcontractors to manufacture Fusion and many of the components and subassemblies for our products, and we rely on sole source suppliers for certain components. We may be required to qualify new or additional subcontractors and suppliers due to capacity constraints, competitive or quality concerns or other risks that may arise, including a result of a change in control of, or deterioration in the financial condition of, a supplier or subcontractor. The process of qualifying subcontractors and suppliers is a lengthy process. Our reliance on subcontractors gives us less control over the manufacturing process and exposes us to significant risks, especially inadequate capacity, late delivery, substandard quality, and high costs. In addition, the manufacture of certain of these components and subassemblies is an extremely complex process. If a supplier became unable to provide parts in the volumes needed or at an acceptable price, we would have to identify and qualify acceptable replacements from alternative sources of supply, or manufacture such components internally. The failure to qualify acceptable replacements quickly would delay the manufacturing & delivery of our products, which could cause us to lose revenues and customers.

We are dependent on two semiconductor device manufacturers, Vitesse Semiconductor and Maxtech Components. Each is a sole source supplier of components manufactured in accordance with our proprietary design and specifications. We have no written supply agreements with these sole source suppliers and purchase our custom components through individual purchase orders. Vitesse Semiconductor is also a Fusion customer.

27

Table of Contents

We may not be able to deliver custom hardware options and software applications to satisfy specific customer needs in a timely manner.

We must develop and deliver customized hardware and software to meet our customers’ specific test requirements. Our test equipment may fail to meet our customers’ technical or cost requirements and may be replaced by competitive equipment or an alternative technology solution. Our inability to provide a test system that meets requested performance criteria when required by a device manufacturer would severely damage our reputation with that customer. This loss of reputation may make it substantially more difficult for us to sell test systems to that manufacturer for a number of years. We have, in the past, experienced delays in introducing some of our products and enhancements.

Our dependence on international sales and non-U.S. suppliers involves significant risk.

International sales have constituted a significant portion of our revenues in recent years, and we expect that this composition will continue. International sales accounted for 66% of our revenues for fiscal year 2004 and 57% for fiscal year 2003. In addition, we rely on non-U.S. suppliers for several components of the equipment we sell. As a result, a major part of our revenues and the ability to manufacture our products are subject to the risks associated with international commerce. A reduction in revenues or a disruption or increase in the cost of our manufacturing materials could hurt our operating results. These international relationships make us particularly sensitive to changes in the countries from which we derive sales and obtain supplies. International sales and our relationships with suppliers may be hurt by many factors, including:

In the past, we have incurred expenses to meet new regulatory requirements in Europe, experienced periodic difficulties in obtaining timely payment from non-U.S. customers, and been affected by the recession in several Asian countries. Our foreign sales are typically invoiced and collected in U.S. dollars. A strengthening in the dollar relative to the currencies of those countries where we do business would increase the prices of our products as stated in those currencies and could hurt our sales in those countries. Significant fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies could cause us to lower our prices and thus reduce our profitability. These fluctuations could also cause prospective customers to push out or delay orders because of the increased relative cost of our products. In the past, there have been significant fluctuations in the exchange rates between the dollar and the currencies of countries in which we do business. While we have not entered into significant foreign currency hedging arrangements, we may do so in the future. If we do enter into foreign currency hedging arrangements, they may not be effective.

Our market is highly competitive, and we have limited resources to compete.

The test equipment industry is highly competitive in all areas of the world. Many other domestic and foreign companies participate in the markets for each of our products, and the industry is highly competitive. Our competitors in the market for semiconductor test equipment include Advantest, Agilent Technologies, Credence Systems, and Teradyne. These major competitors have substantially greater financial resources and more extensive engineering, manufacturing, marketing, and customer support capabilities.

28

Table of Contents

We expect our competitors to enhance their current products and to introduce new products with comparable or better price and performance. The introduction of competing products could hurt sales of our current and future products. In addition, new competitors, including semiconductor manufacturers themselves, may offer new testing technologies, which may in turn reduce the value of our product lines. Increased competition could lead to intensified price-based competition, which would hurt our business and results of operations. Unless we are able to invest significant financial resources in developing products and maintaining customer support centers worldwide, we may not be able to compete effectively.

Development of our products requires significant lead-time, and we may fail to correctly anticipate the technical needs of our customers.

Our customers make decisions regarding purchases of our test equipment while their devices are still in development. Our test systems are used by our customers to develop, test and manufacture their new devices. We therefore must anticipate industry trends and develop products in advance of the commercialization of our customers’ devices, requiring us to make significant capital investments to develop new test equipment for our customers well before their devices are introduced. If our customers fail to introduce their devices in a timely manner or the market does not accept their devices, we may not recover our capital investment through sales in significant volume. In addition, even if we are able to successfully develop enhancements or new generations of our products, these enhancements or new generations of products may not generate revenue in excess of the costs of development, and they may be quickly rendered obsolete by changing customer preferences or the introduction of products embodying new technologies or features by our competitors. Furthermore, if we were to make announcements of product delays, or if our competitors were to make announcements of new test systems, these announcements could cause our customers to defer or forego purchases of our existing test systems, which would also hurt our business.

Our success depends on attracting and retaining key personnel.

Our success will depend substantially upon the continued service of our executive officers and key personnel, none of whom are bound by an employment or non-competition agreement. Our success will depend on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified managers and technical, engineering, marketing, sales and support personnel. Competition for such specialized personnel is intense, and it may become more difficult for us to hire or retain them. Our volatile business cycles only aggravate this problem. Our layoffs in any industry downturn could make it more difficult for us to hire or retain qualified personnel. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by the loss of any of our key employees, by the failure of any key employee to perform in his or her current positions, or by our inability to attract and retain skilled employees.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights.

Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain intellectual property rights and licenses and to preserve other intellectual property rights covering our products and development and testing tools. To that end, we have obtained certain domestic patents and may continue to seek patents on our inventions when appropriate. We have also obtained certain trademark registrations. To date, we have not sought patent protection in any countries other than the United States, which may impair our ability to protect our intellectual property in foreign jurisdictions. The process of seeking intellectual property protection can be time consuming and expensive. We cannot ensure that:

29

Table of Contents

If we do not successfully enforce our intellectual property rights, our competitive position could suffer, which could harm our operating results. We also rely on trade secrets, proprietary know-how and confidentiality provisions in agreements with employees and consultants to protect our intellectual property. Other parties may not comply with the terms of their agreements with us, and we may not be able to adequately enforce our rights against these people.

Third parties may claim we are infringing their intellectual property, and we could suffer significant litigation costs, licensing expenses or be prevented from selling our products.

Intellectual property rights are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. We may be unknowingly infringing on the intellectual property rights of others and may be liable for that infringement, which could result in significant liability for us. If we do infringe the intellectual property rights of others, we could be forced to either seek a license to intellectual property rights of others or alter our products so that they no longer infringe the intellectual property rights of others. A license could be very expensive to obtain or may not be available at all. Similarly, changing our products or processes to avoid infringing the rights of others may be costly or impractical.

We are responsible for any patent litigation costs. If we were to become involved in a dispute regarding intellectual property, whether ours or that of another company, we may have to participate in legal proceedings. These types of proceedings may be costly and time consuming for us, even if we eventually prevail. If we do not prevail, we might be forced to pay significant damages, obtain licenses, modify our products or processes, stop making products or stop using processes.

Our stock price is volatile.

In the twelve-month period ending on July 31, 2004, our stock price ranged from a low of $7.49 to a high of $19.83. The price of our common stock has been and likely will continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of events and factors, such as:

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market prices for semiconductor-related companies in particular, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that often have been unrelated to the operating performance of the companies affected by these fluctuations. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance.

We have substantial indebtedness.

We have $150 million principal amount of 4.25% Convertible Subordinated Notes (the “Notes”) due 2006. We may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The level of indebtedness, among other things, could

30

Table of Contents

There can be no assurance that we will be able to meet our debt service obligations, including our obligations under the Notes.

We may not be able to satisfy a change in control offer.

The indenture governing the Notes contains provisions that apply to a change in control of LTX. If someone triggers a fundamental change as defined in the indenture, we may be required to offer to purchase the Notes with cash. If we have to make that offer, we cannot be sure that we will have enough funds to pay for all the Notes that the holders could tender.

We may not be able to pay our debt and other obligations.

If our cash flow is inadequate to meet our obligations, we could face substantial liquidity problems. In particular, our Notes mature in August 2006. Our line of credit and credit facility mature on an annual basis and will expire in November 2004 and July 2005, respectively, if not renewed by us and the issuing bank. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain funds necessary to make required payment of our Notes, or certain or our other obligations, we would be in default under the terms thereof, which could permit the holders of those obligations to accelerate their maturity and also could cause default under future indebtedness we may incur. Any such default could have material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial position and operating results. In addition, we may not be able to repay amounts due in respect of our Notes if payment of those obligations were to be accelerated following the occurrence of any other event of default as defined in the instruments creating those obligations. Moreover, we may not have sufficient funds or be able to arrange for financing to pay the principal amount of our Notes at their maturity.

We may need additional financing, which could be difficult to obtain.

We expect that our existing cash and marketable securities, and borrowings from available bank financings, will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements to fund operations and expected capital expenditures for the foreseeable future. In the event, we may need to raise additional funds, we cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain such additional financing on favorable terms if at all. Further, if we issue additional equity securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of common stock. Future financings may place restrictions on how we operate our business. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, if and when needed, we may not be able to develop or enhance our products and services, take advantage of future opportunities, grow our business or respond to competitive pressures, which could seriously harm our business.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit-risk consist principally of investments in cash equivalents, short-term investments and trade receivables. We place our investments with high-quality financial institutions, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one institution and have established investment guidelines relative to diversification and maturities designed to maintain safety and liquidity.

Our primary exposures to market risks include fluctuations in interest rates on our short-term and long-term debt of approximately $150.3 million as of July 31, 2004, and in foreign currency exchange rates. We are subject to interest rate risk on our short-term borrowings under our credit facilities. Our short term bank debt bears interest at prime. Long term debt interest rates are fixed for the term of the Notes.

31

Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Operating in international markets involves exposure to movements in currency exchange rates. Currency exchange rate movements typically also reflect economic growth, inflation, interest rates, government actions and other factors. We transact business in various foreign currencies and, accordingly, we are subject to exposure from adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. As currency exchange rates fluctuate, translation of the statements of operations of our international businesses into U.S. dollars may affect year-over-year comparability and could cause us to adjust our financing and operating strategies. To date, the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on revenues and operating expenses have not been material. Substantially all of our revenues are invoiced and collected in U.S. dollars. Our trade receivables result primarily from sales to semiconductor manufacturers located in North America, Japan, the Pacific Rim and Europe. In fiscal 2004, our revenues derived from sales outside the United States constituted 66% of our total revenues. Accounts receivable in currencies other than U.S. dollars comprise 8.1% of the outstanding accounts receivable trade balance at July 31, 2004. Receivables are from major corporations or are supported by letters of credit. We maintain reserves for potential credit losses and such losses have been immaterial. Accounts payable in currencies other than U.S. dollars comprise 14.0% of the outstanding accounts payable balance at July 31, 2004.

Based on a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates, the potential losses in future earnings, fair value of risk-sensitive financial instruments, and cash flows are immaterial, although the actual effects may differ materially from the hypothetical analysis.

Interest Rate Risk

The Company’s Convertible Subordinated Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.25%, and therefore changes in interest rates do not impact the Company’s interest expense on this debt. The Company from time to time has outstanding short-term borrowings with variable interest rates. The total average amount of these borrowings outstanding annually has been insignificant. Therefore, the Company expects that a 1% change in interest rate will not have any material effect on the Company’s interest expense.

32

Table of Contents

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

LTX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

33

Table of Contents

LTX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands, except per share data)