Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004

or

For the transition period from                  to                 .

Commission File Number: 0-30260

eGain Communications Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates, on the OTC Bulletin Board on December 31, 2003 (the last business day of registrants second quarter of fiscal 2004), was approximately $1,346,422. For purposes of the foregoing calculation only, the registrant has included in the shares owned by affiliates the beneficial ownership of voting and non-voting common equity of officers and directors, and affiliated entities, of the registrant and members of their families. Such inclusion shall not be construed as an admission that any such person is an affiliate for any other purpose.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨    No x

As of September 22, 2004, there were 3,695,739 shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Items 10 (as to directors), 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III incorporate by reference information from the registrant’s proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the registrant’s 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Table of Contents

eGAIN COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2004 FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

eGAIN COMMUNICATION CORPORATION

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

This report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements may be identified by the use of the words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “could,” “would,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should,” or “will” and similar expressions or the negative of those terms. The forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, risks stemming from strategic and operational choices in recent quarters, our equity structure and the significant risk of dilution, the adequacy of our capital resources and need for additional financing, our technological leadership and product development capabilities, the expansion of our strategic relationships and distribution capabilities and our corresponding ability to grow revenue, the competitive landscape of our industry, our continued net losses since inception, our limited operating history, liquidation preferences related to our preferred stock, continued lengthy and delayed sales cycles, broad economic and political instability around the world affecting the market for our goods and services, the continued need for customer service and contact center software solutions and the continued acceptance of our Web-native architecture, the effects of cost reductions on our workforce and ability to service customers, risks from our substantial international operations, adverse results in pending litigation, legal and regulatory uncertainties and other risks related to protection of our intellectual property assets and the operational integrity and maintenance of our systems. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in statements relating to our future plans, product releases, objectives, expectations and intentions, and other assumptions underlying or relating to any of these statements. Factors that could contribute to such differences include those discussed in “Additional Factors That May Affect Future Results” and elsewhere in this document. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or understanding to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

Overview

We are a leading provider of customer service and contact center software, used by global enterprises for over a decade. eGain Service 6^™, our software suite, available through licensed or hosted models, includes integrated, best-in-class applications for customer email management, live web collaboration, virtual agent customer service, knowledge management, and web self-service. These robust applications are built on the eGain Service Management Platform (eGain SMP^™), a scalable next-generation framework that includes end-to-end service process management, multi-channel, multi-site contact center management, a flexible integration approach, and certified out-of-the-box integrations with leading call center and business systems.

Recent Developments

On March 31, 2004, we entered into a note and warrant purchase agreement with Ashutosh Roy, our Chief Executive Officer, Oak Hill Capital Partners L.P., Oak Hill Capital Management Partners L.P., and FW Investors L.P. (the “lenders”) pursuant to which the lenders loaned to us $2.5 million evidenced by secured promissory notes and received warrants to purchase shares of our common stock in connection with such loan. The secured promissory notes have a term of five years and bear interest at an effective annual rate of 12% due and payable upon the maturity of such notes. We have the option to prepay the notes at any time subject to the prepayment penalties set forth in such notes. The warrants allow the lenders to purchase up to 312,500 shares at an exercise price of $2.00 per share. The warrants become exercisable as to fifty percent (50%) of the warrant shares nine months after issuance of the warrants and as to one hundred percent (100%) of the warrant shares on the first anniversary of the issuance of the warrants. We recorded $2.28 million in related party notes payable and $223,000 of discount on the notes related to the relative value of the warrants issued in the transaction that will

3

Table of Contents

be amortized to interest expense over the five year life of the notes. The fair value of these warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes valuation method with the following assumptions: an expected life of 3 years, an expected stock price volatility of 75%, a risk free interest rate of 1.93%, and a dividend yield of 0%.

In February 2004, we were delisted from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market due to noncompliance with Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(2)(B), which requires companies listed to have a minimum of $2,500,000 in stockholders’ equity or $35,000,000 market value of listed securities or $500,000 of net income from continuing operations for the most recently completed fiscal year or two of the three most recently completed fiscal years. Our common stock now trades in the over-the-counter market on the OTC Bulletin Board owned by The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., which was established for securities that do not meet the listing requirements of the Nasdaq National Market or the Nasdaq SmallCap Market.

Industry Background

The Internet has fundamentally changed the manner in which businesses and customers interact. Today’s customers demand instant access to customer service and expect immediate responses to questions and issues.

The ability to deliver consistent customer service in a multi-channel contact center has become a necessity in today’s competitive business environment. Failure to address the multi-channel service needs of customers can result in diminished customer loyalty and a deteriorating competitive position and brand reputation.

Over the past few years, numerous software vendors have developed point solutions, designed to handle online customer communications through a specific channel such as email, real-time Web collaboration or self-service. However, point solutions do not meet the demands of companies who want flexibility in how they communicate with customers based on the nature of their inquiry. Point solutions also create interaction silos, making it difficult for customer service agents to easily reference a customer’s past communications that originated from multiple channels. Nor do they use a common knowledge base to deliver consistent accurate responses. Moreover, many of these solutions do not integrate easily with a company’s existing legacy system, making it difficult to implement and maintain these applications.

To meet the demands of the modern customer, businesses need a comprehensive, functionally rich, yet deeply integrated customer service suite to serve customers across the phone, web, and email. eGain has designed its suite of software applications to meet this need.

The eGain Solution

Our application suite, eGain Service 6^™, is available licensed or hosted, and includes integrated, best-in-class applications for customer email management, live web collaboration, virtual agent customer service, knowledge management, and web self-service. These robust applications are built on the eGain SMP^™, a scalable next-generation framework that includes end-to-end service process management, multi-channel, multi-site contact center management, a flexible integration approach, and certified out-of-the-box integrations with leading call center and business systems.

Our applications and platform are based on a 100% Internet architecture and open standards such as J2EE, XML, HTTP, JDBC and Java and are designed to be easily integrated and highly scalable.

We provide companies with the following benefits:

4

Table of Contents

The eGain Strategy

Our objective is to further enhance our position as a leading provider of customer service and contact center software. The key elements of our strategy include:

Enhance and Expand the Leading Integrated, Multi-Channel Customer Service Platform.    We believe we are one of the few companies that provide software to enable integrated communication across email, real-time web channels such as chat and co-browsing, and web self-service, in addition to the phone through seamless telephony integration. We have a strong track record of successfully extending our platform through internal development and acquisitions and continue to invest in research and development efforts. We believe we were the first company to expand channels of communication by integrating the email and real-time channels. We also believe we were the first company to offer self-service and knowledge management applications integrated into a complete customer service platform. In addition, our solution is designed to integrate with leading CRM, ERP and call center systems, enabling customers to leverage investments in existing systems and providing an enterprise-wide solution.

Provide Demonstrable Return on Investment to Customers.    Especially in these challenging economic times when many companies are dramatically scaling back their investments in information technology, we believe customers will only buy enterprise software if they are convinced it will result in real return on investment (“ROI”), in both the short and long run. A central element of our strategy is the ability to provide companies with demonstrable ROI from the purchase of our software applications. Among the ways in which our products are designed to provide this ROI are: increased revenues from enhanced customer loyalty, timely pre-sales help via live web collaboration, and contextual upselling/cross-selling in a service context; decreased headcount and associated costs, improved agent productivity in the call center and customer support areas; enabling new paradigms such as call center consolidation and off-shoring; providing customers with access to

5

Table of Contents

lower-cost service alternatives than traditional telephone support; and preserving and leveraging existing information technology investments using our easily-integrated products. Our comprehensive ROI assessment tools make it easier for our customers and prospects to invest in our solutions.

Technology Leadership.    With the creation of our flagship product, eGain Email, we were the first company to introduce a 100% web-native solution to address the need for online customer interaction management. Since inception, we have designed our products from the ground up for easy browser access from anywhere at any time, and rapid, flexible deployment via in-house or hosted options. We intend to maintain our technology leadership by continuing to fine-tune our applications and user interfaces to a 100% web architecture for maximum performance, user adoption and productivity. We believe that our web-native architecture provides true global access, improved scalability, easier integration with existing enterprise applications and systems, and lower deployment costs than alternative products.

Flexible Delivery Options.    We believe that offering our solution on a hosted or licensed basis provides customers with a meaningful choice of deployment options. Customers can choose to license applications for deployment at their facilities, or employ our hosted operations. They may also choose an in-house implementation managed remotely by our managed services program. Customers choosing to receive hosted access to our solutions can focus on other aspects of their business while benefiting from the rapid deployment, 24x7 reliability and support, scalability on demand, and lower up-front investment that the hosting option offers. We believe that we offer the highest level of deployment flexibility among enterprise-class customer service software vendors.

Expand Global Distribution Capabilities.    We intend to expand our global distribution capabilities through our direct sales efforts as well as strategic relationships. We maintain a sales presence in 19 countries including the United Kingdom, India and Japan. With the introduction of multi-lingual versions of our products (Asian and Western European language capabilities), we may attempt to further penetrate international markets. In addition to our direct sales and marketing efforts, we are engaged in a number of formal and informal strategic relationships with system integrators, consulting firms, technology partners and solution providers.

Products and Services

eGain Service 6 Suite of Applications

eGain Service 6 is a complete customer service management solution. Built for rapidly implementing next-generation contact-center strategies, it consists of a service process management platform—the unique and open eGain SMP^™—and best-of-breed applications for self-service and the contact center. Unlike most existing customer service suites, which are old client-server software packages, eGain Service 6 combines industry best practices and powerful service process management capabilities with a pure web architecture and an industry-leading 6th-generation browser-based user interface. The solution offers true multi-channel service and integrated work management, and is designed to leverage existing investments in contact centers, business systems, and web sites.

The individual applications in the suite are described below:

6

Table of Contents

Hosted Operations

Our hosted customers receive access to the full functionality of our applications through a standard web browser and Internet connection. Through a network of our service centers and hosting partners linked by high-speed Internet connections, we provide our customers with multiple redundant paths to access their hosted customer service applications. We remotely manage these applications which reside on server machines housed at leading co-location facilities. We also offer value-added services to our hosted customers, including application management, database maintenance, mail hosting and anti-virus protection. We have also developed proprietary web-based hosted service management systems, enabling our service professionals to efficiently administer and manage large numbers of hosted customer applications.

7

Table of Contents

Furthermore, the multi-tenant capability of eGain Service 6 allows us to more effectively serve multiple customers at reduced cost of ownership.

Professional Services

Our worldwide professional services organization provides consulting, hosting, technical support and education services designed to ensure customer success and build customer loyalty.

As of fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, we had approximately 78 professionals providing worldwide services for systems installation, solutions development, application management, and education and support.

Sales and Marketing

Sales Strategy

Our sales strategy is to pursue targeted accounts through a combination of our direct sales force and strategic alliances. We target our sales efforts at Global 2000 companies. Our North American direct sales personnel are based at our corporate headquarters in Mountain View, California, with field sales presence throughout the United States and Canada. Internationally, we have field offices in Ireland, Italy, India, Japan, and the United Kingdom.

The direct sales force is organized into teams that include both sales representatives and sales consultants. Our direct sales force is complemented by telemarketing representatives.

We further complement our direct sales force with a series of reseller and sales alliances. Through these alliances, we are able to leverage additional sales, marketing and deployment capabilities.

Marketing and Partner Strategy

Our marketing strategy is to build market awareness as a leading provider of customer service and contact center software that enables Global 2000 companies to transform traditional call centers into multi-channel contact centers that generate profits and value for the entire enterprise. Our marketing also focuses on generating qualified leads for the sales force.

We employ a wide range of marketing avenues to deliver our message, including print and Internet advertising, targeted electronic and postal mailing, email newsletters and a variety of trade shows, seminars and interest groups.

8

Table of Contents

Our marketing group also produces sales tools, including product collateral, customer case studies, demonstrations, presentations and competitive analyses. In addition, our marketing group performs market analyses and conducts focus group and customer reviews to identify and develop key partnership opportunities and product requirements.

We believe that our partners help extend the breadth and depth of our product offerings, drive market penetration, and augment our professional service capabilities. We believe these relationships are important to delivering successful, integrated products and services to our customers.

As of fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, there were approximately 44 employees engaged in worldwide sales and marketing activities.

Customers

We serve a worldwide customer base across a wide variety of industry sectors. No customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenue in the fiscal year just ended. The following is a representative list of companies that have entered into license agreements for one or more of our products:

Competition

The market for customer service and contact center software is intensely competitive. Other than product innovation and existing customer relationships, there are no substantial barriers to entry in this market, and established or new entities may enter this market in the near future. While home-grown software developed by enterprises represents indirect competition, we also compete directly with packaged application software vendors in the customer service arena, including Avaya, Inc., Firepond, Inc., Genesys Telecommunications (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alcatel), Kana Software, Inc., Primus Knowledge Solutions, Inc., RightNow Technologies, Inc., Serviceware, and Talisma Corp. In addition, we face actual or potential competition from larger software companies such as Siebel Systems, Inc., PeopleSoft, Inc., Oracle Corporation, SAP Inc. and similar companies that may attempt to sell customer service software to their installed base.

We believe competition will continue to be fierce and increase as current competitors increase the sophistication of their offerings and as new participants enter the market. Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, broader brand recognition, and significantly

9

Table of Contents

greater financial, marketing and other resources. With more established and better-financed competitors, these companies may be able to undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, and make more attractive offers to businesses to induce them to use their products or services.

Further, any delays in the general market acceptance of our applications would likely harm our competitive position by allowing our competitors additional time to improve their product and service offerings, and also provide time for new competitors to develop applications and solicit prospective customers within our target markets. Increased competition could result in pricing pressures, reduced operating margins and loss of market share.

Product Development

The market for our products changes rapidly and is characterized by evolving industry standards, swift changes in customer requirements and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. We believe that strong product development capabilities are essential to our strategy of maintaining technology leadership. This includes enhancing current technology, providing excellent quality, performance, and functionality, as well as developing additional applications and maintaining the competitiveness of our product and service offerings. We have invested significant time and resources to create a structured process for undertaking all product development. This process involves several functional groups at all levels within our organization and is designed to provide a framework for defining and addressing the activities required in bringing product concepts and development projects to market successfully.

In addition, we continuously analyze market and customer requirements and evaluate technology that we believe will enhance platform acceptance in the market. We selectively choose partners with superior technology to enhance features and functionality of our product offerings.

As of fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, there were approximately 66 employees engaged in worldwide product development activities.

Intellectual Property

We regard our copyrights, service marks, trademarks and similar intellectual property as critical to our success. We rely on patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret and other laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and licensing arrangements, to protect the proprietary aspects of our technology and business. We own four patents in the field of case-based reasoning, and have patents pending on various other aspects of our technology.

We are continually assessing the propriety of seeking patent and other intellectual property protection for those aspects of our technology that we believe constitute innovations providing significant competitive advantages. Pending and future applications may or may not receive the issuance of valid patents and trademarks.

We routinely require our employees, customers, and potential business partners to enter into confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements before we will disclose any sensitive aspects of our products, technology, or business plans. In addition, we require employees to agree to surrender to us any proprietary information, inventions or other intellectual property they generate or come to possess while employed by us. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights through confidentiality and license agreements, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology. These precautions may not prevent misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual property. In addition, some of our license agreements with certain customers and partners require us to place the source code for our products into escrow. These agreements typically provide that some party will have a limited, non-exclusive right to access and use this code as authorized by the license agreement if there is a bankruptcy proceeding instituted by or against us, or if we materially breach a contractual commitment to provide support and maintenance to the party.

10

Table of Contents

Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our copyrights, trademarks and similar proprietary rights. In addition, other parties may assert infringement claims against us. Our products may infringe issued patents that may relate to our products. In addition, because patent applications in the United States are not publicly disclosed until the patent is issued, applications may have been filed which relate to our software products. We may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time in the ordinary course of our business, including claims of alleged infringement of the trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties. Intellectual property litigation is expensive and time-consuming and could divert management’s attention away from running our business. This litigation could also require us to develop non-infringing technology or enter into royalty or license agreements. These royalty or license agreements, if required, may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all, in the event of a successful claim of infringement. Our failure or inability to develop non-infringing technology or license the proprietary rights on a timely basis would harm our business.

Employees

As of fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, we had 223 full-time employees, of which 66 were in product development, 81 in services and support, 44 in sales and marketing, and 32 in finance and administration.

None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. While we believe our relations with employees are good, our future performance depends largely upon the continued service of our key technical, sales and marketing, and senior management personnel, none of whom are bound by employment agreements requiring service for a defined period of time. The loss of services of one or more of our key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may not be successful in attracting, training and retaining qualified personnel, and the failure to do so, particularly in key functional areas such as product development and sales, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our future success will likely depend largely on our ability to attract and retain experienced sales, technical, marketing and management personnel.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

We lease all facilities used in our business. The following table summarizes our principal properties.

We believe our facilities are suitable for our uses and are generally adequate to support the current level of operations for the next 12 months.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Beginning on October 25, 2001, a number of securities class action complaints were filed against us, and certain of our then officers and directors and underwriters connected with our initial public offering of common stock in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (consolidated into In re Initial Public Offering Sec. Litig.). The complaints alleged generally that the prospectus under which such securities were sold contained false and misleading statements with respect to discounts and excess commissions received by the underwriters as well as allegations of “laddering” whereby underwriters required their customers to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket in exchange for an allocation of IPO shares. The complaints sought an unspecified amount in damages on behalf of persons who purchased the common stock between September 23, 1999 and December 6, 2000. Similar complaints were filed against 55 underwriters and more than 300 other

11

Table of Contents

companies and other individuals. The over 1,000 complaints were consolidated into a single action. We reached an agreement with the plaintiffs to resolve the cases as to our liability and that of our officers and directors. The settlement involved no monetary payment or other consideration by us or our officers and directors and no admission of liability. The Court has not yet approved the settlement.

On December 13, 2002, Mindfabric, Inc. filed an action for patent infringement against us. The suit was settled and resolved in April, 2004 with no cash payments and the execution of a cross-licensing agreement between the parties.

On February 26, 2003, Golden Gate Plaza, LLC filed a complaint for unlawful detainer against us. On December 23, 2003 we entered into a settlement agreement with the plaintiff to resolve the case (see Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 13: Litigation). A Request for Dismissal was entered by the court on January 12, 2004 and the settlement was later approved.

On February 12, 2004, we filed suit against Insight Enterprises, Inc., the acquirer of Comark, Inc., a value-added reseller of our software, claiming inter alia breach of contract and failure to pay in connection with a sale of our software to one customer. The lawsuit seeks in excess of $600,000 in damages.

From time to time we are party to routine legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business and incidental to our business, none of which are expected to have a material adverse impact, as taken individually or in the aggregate, upon our business, financial position or results of operations. However, even if these claims are not meritorious, the ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain, and it could divert management’s attention and impact other resources.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

12

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER

MATTERS

(a)  Market Information

In Fiscal Year 2003, our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market giving effect to a one-for-ten reverse stock split on August 20, 2003. In February 2004 eGain’s Common Stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “EGAN.OB”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, high and low sale prices for eGain’s Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq SmallCap Market or the OTC Bulletin Board. The figures below are on a post-reverse stock split basis.

(b)  Holders

As of September 22, 2004, there were approximately 380 stockholders of record. This number does not include stockholders whose shares are held in trust by other entities. We estimate that there were approximately 9,100 beneficial stockholders of our common stock as of September 22, 2004.

(c)  Dividends

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain all available funds for use in the operation of our business and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

(d)  Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Equity Compensation Plan Information

13

Table of Contents

(e)  Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities, Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

(1) Notes and Warrants issued in March 2004

(2) Notes and Warrants issued in October 2003

(3) Notes and Warrants issued in December 2002

The proceeds from such issuances were used by eGain for general working capital purposes.

14

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data set forth on the following page should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and other financial information included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods.

15

Table of Contents

This report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements may be identified by the use of the words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continue,” “could,” “would,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “might,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “should,” or “will” and similar expressions or the negative of those terms. The forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, risks stemming from strategic and operational choices in recent quarters, our equity structure and the significant risk of dilution, the adequacy of our capital resources and need for additional financing, our technological leadership and product development capabilities, the expansion of our strategic relationships and distribution capabilities and our corresponding ability to grow revenue, the competitive landscape of our industry, our continued net losses since inception, our limited operating history, liquidation preferences related to our preferred stock, continued lengthy and delayed sales cycles, broad economic and political instability around the world affecting the market for our goods and services, the continued need for customer service and contact center software solutions and the continued acceptance of our Web-native architecture, the effects of cost reductions on our workforce and ability to service customers, risks from our substantial international operations, adverse results in pending litigation, legal and regulatory uncertainties and other risks related to protection of our intellectual property assets and the operational integrity and maintenance of our systems. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in statements relating to our future plans, product releases, objectives, expectations and intentions, and other assumptions underlying or relating to any of these statements. Factors that could contribute to such differences include those discussed in “Additional Factors That May Affect Future Results” and elsewhere in this document. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or understanding to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.

Overview

We are a leading provider of customer service and contact center software, used by global enterprises for over a decade. eGain Service 6^™, our software suite, available through licensed or hosted models, includes integrated, best-in-class applications for customer email management, live web collaboration, virtual agent customer service, knowledge management, and web self-service. These robust applications are built on the eGain Service Management Platform (eGain SMP^™), a scalable next-generation framework that includes end-to-end service process management, multi-channel, multi-site contact center management, a flexible integration approach, and certified out-of-the-box integrations with leading call center and business systems. We market and sell our products worldwide through our direct sales force and third-party distribution partners.

We were founded in September 1997. Since inception, we have incurred substantial costs developing our proprietary technological solutions, recruiting and compensating personnel, and purchasing operating assets. As a result of these efforts, and the decline in technology spending by our customers in recent years we have incurred significant losses and had an accumulated deficit of $315.5 million as of June 30, 2004, which includes approximately $80.3 million related to goodwill charges.

In response to our revenues declining over the last three years we have repeatedly taken actions to reduce expense rates. As a result of these actions our net loss from operations decreased to $4.4 million in fiscal year 2004 from $11.6 million in fiscal year 2003 and $115.1 million in fiscal year 2002. In addition, net cash used in operating activities decreased to $2.3 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $5.9 million in fiscal year 2003 and $27.5 million in fiscal year 2002. With this progress on expense reduction and securing $4.5 million in long-term debt financing in fiscal 2004, our cash and cash equivalents increased to $5.2 million on June 30, 2004 from $4.4 million on June 30, 2003. As of June 30, 2004, we had working capital of $2.0 million, compared to a working capital deficit of $172,000 at June 30, 2003. We believe that existing capital resources will enable us to maintain current and planned operations for the next 12 months. We intend to continue to make investments in

16

Table of Contents

product development and technology to enhance our current products and services, develop new products and services and further advance our solution offerings. We have not achieved profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. In view of the rapidly evolving nature of our business and limited operating history, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our revenue and operating results may not be meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance.

In April 2001, we obtained final regulatory approval from the government of India to complete the acquisition of eGain Communications Private Limited (“eGain India”), formerly Nitman Software Private Limited, a software development company located in Pune, India. Effective April 23, 2001, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of eGain India for cash. The acquisition has been at the cornerstone of our strategy of developing a global operating model that allows the company to maintain its commitment to the customer service and contact center market and innovation while remaining fiscally prudent.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, valuation allowances and accrued liabilities, long-lived assets and restructuring. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Revenue Recognition

We derive revenues from three sources, hosting fees, license fees and services. Services include software maintenance and support, training and system implementation consulting. Maintenance and support consists of technical support and software upgrades and enhancements. Significant management judgments and estimates are made and used to determine the revenue recognized in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period if different conditions were to prevail.

We apply the provisions of Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP 98-9 “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions” to all transactions involving the sale of software products.

We recognize license revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has been delivered, no significant obligations remain, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is probable. In software arrangements that include rights to multiple software products and/or services, we use the residual method under which revenue is allocated to the undelivered elements based on vendor specific objective evidence of the fair value of such undelivered elements. The residual amount of revenue is allocated to the delivered elements and recognized as revenue. Such undelivered elements in these arrangements typically consist of services.

We recognize hosting services revenue ratably over the period of the applicable agreement as services are provided. Hosting agreements are typically for a period of one year and automatically renew unless either party cancels the agreement.

We use signed software license and services agreements and order forms as evidence of an arrangement for sales of software, hosting, maintenance and support. We use signed engagement letters to evidence an arrangement for system implementation consulting and training.

17

Table of Contents

Software is delivered to customers electronically or on a CD-ROM. We assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction. Our standard payment terms are generally less than 90 days. In instances where payments are subject to extended payment terms, revenue is deferred until payments become due. We assess collectability based on a number of factors, including the customer’s past payment history and its current creditworthiness. If we determine that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, we defer the revenue and recognize it at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash payment. If an acceptance period is required, revenue is recognized upon the earlier of customer acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period.

When licenses are sold together with consulting and implementation services, license fees are recognized upon shipment, provided that (1) the above criteria have been met, (2) payment of the license fees is not dependent upon the performance of the consulting and implementation services, and (3) the services are not essential to the functionality of the software. For arrangements that do not meet the above criteria, both the product license revenues and services revenues are recognized in accordance with the provisions of SOP 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction Type and Certain Production Type Contracts.” When reliable estimates are available for the costs and efforts necessary to complete the implementation services, we account for the arrangements under the percentage of completion method pursuant to SOP 81-1. When such estimates are not available, the completed contract method is utilized.

The majority of our consulting and implementation services and accompanying agreements qualify for separate accounting. We use vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value for the services and maintenance to account for the arrangement using the residual method, regardless of any separate prices stated within the contract for each element. Our consulting and implementation service contracts are bid either on a fixed-fee basis or on a time-and-materials basis. For a fixed-fee contract, we recognize revenue upon completion of specific contractual milestones or using the percentage of completion method. For time-and-materials contracts, we recognize revenue as services are performed.

Maintenance and support revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance contract, which is typically one year. Training revenue is recognized when training is provided.

Revenue from sales to resellers is recognized either upon delivery to the reseller or on a sell-through basis, depending on the facts and circumstances of the transaction, such as our understanding of the reseller’s use of our software, the reseller’s financial status and our past experience with the particular reseller. Accordingly the decision whether to recognize revenue to resellers either upon delivery or on a sell-through basis requires significant management judgment. This judgment can materially impact the timing of revenue recognition.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

Effective July 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142 and ceased amortization of goodwill and began reviewing it annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment. In addition, we evaluated our remaining purchased intangible assets to determine that all such assets have determinable lives. We operate under a single reporting unit and accordingly, all of our goodwill is associated with the entire company. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 142, we amortized goodwill on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of three years.

In connection with the transitional goodwill impairment evaluation provisions of SFAS 142, we performed a goodwill impairment review as of July 1, 2002 and found no impairment. We also performed our annual goodwill impairment review as of April 1, 2004 and found no impairment.

As of July 1, 2002, in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”), we review long-lived assets, including property and equipment and intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Under

18

Table of Contents

SFAS 144, an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is assessed using discounted cash flows. Significant management judgment is required in the forecasting of future operating results which are used in the preparation of projected discounted cash flows and, should different conditions prevail or judgments be made, material write-downs of net intangible assets and/or goodwill could occur. In addition, our depreciation and amortization policies reflect judgments on the estimated useful lives of assets.

Restructuring

We have taken restructuring charges related to excess facilities and have established reserves of estimable cost (as required by accounting standards) against outstanding commitments for leased properties that we have abandoned. These reserves are based upon our estimate of triggering events, such as the time required to sublease the property and the amount of sublease income that might be generated from the date of abandonment and the expiration of the lease. These estimates are reviewed based on changes in these triggering events. Adjustments to the restructuring charge will be made in future periods, if necessary, should different conditions prevail from those anticipated in our original estimate.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for potential uncollectable trade receivables. We review our trade receivables by aging category to identify specific customers with known disputes or collectability issues. We exercise judgment when determining the adequacy of these reserves as we evaluate historical bad debt trends, general economic conditions in the U.S. and internationally, and changes in customer financial conditions. If we made different judgments or utilized different estimates, material differences may result in additional reserves for trade receivables, which would be reflected by charges in general and administrative expenses for any period presented.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth certain items reflected in our consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percent of total revenues for the periods indicated.

19

Table of Contents

Revenue

Overall revenue, which consists of license revenue and support and services revenue, was $19.6 million, $22.1 million and $30.4 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In fiscal year 2004, overall revenue decreased 11%, or $2.5 million compared to fiscal year 2003. Overall revenue was relatively flat quarter over quarter throughout fiscal year 2004 so the relative decrease was attributable to the steep revenue decline in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004 where overall revenue decreased by 15% compared to the last quarter of fiscal year 2003. For fiscal year 2003, overall revenue decreased 27%, or $8.3 million compared to fiscal year 2002. The reduction in overall revenue over the last two fiscal years was primarily due to the continuing weak economic environment, and in particular spending in technology, and its adverse impact on sales of enterprise software. The weakness was particularly pronounced in the North American market in fiscal 2003 as both existing and prospective customers postponed purchases or made smaller purchases than in previous years, but stabilized in fiscal 2004. Revenue from North America declined $1.0 million or 9% in fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003 and declined $6.2 million, or 36% in fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal year 2002.

License revenue was $4.1 million, $6.1 million and $10.0 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This represents a decreased 33%, or $2.0 million in fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003 and a decrease of 39%, or $3.9 million in fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal year 2002. The decreases over the last two fiscal years were primarily due to the slowing global economy that resulted in a decline in customer orders as well as lengthened sales cycles worldwide as well as a shift by new customers to select the hosted option versus a license purchase of our software.

Support and Services revenue was $15.5 million, $16.0 million and $20.4 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This represents a decrease of 3%, or $444,000 in fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003 and a decrease of 22%, or $4.4 million in fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal year 2002. The decreases over the last two fiscal years were primarily due to the reduction in license revenue that resulted in a decline in new maintenance contracts, customer implementations and system integration projects. In fiscal 2004 support and services revenue reached its lowest point of $3.8 million in the first quarter but increased quarter over quarter during the year to $4.0 million in the fourth quarter. This was primarily due to a reduction in support and hosting cancellations and an increase in the number of new hosting customers during the year. Hosting revenue was $3.1 million, $3.7 million and $5.6 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Even though hosting revenues declined year-over-year from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004, we did see the reversal of this trend due to the increased number of new customers signing up for hosting in fiscal 2004. Hosting revenues increased by approximately 20% in the second half of fiscal 2004 when compared to the first half of fiscal 2004.

In fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenue.

Cost of License

Cost of license primarily includes the amortization of prepaid third-party software royalties and delivery costs for shipments to customers. Cost of license decreased 7%, or $126,000 in fiscal year 2004 compared to fiscal year 2003. Cost of license increased 107%, or $914,000 in fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal year 2002. The decrease in fiscal year 2004 was primarily due to the extension of one royalty agreement with a third-party vendor that resulted in a reduction of $172,000 in the amortization of prepaid royalties. We expect cost of license to continue to decline in future periods with the expiration or renewal of other third party royalty agreements.

Cost of Support and Services

Cost of support and services includes personnel costs for our hosting services, consulting services and

customer support. It also includes depreciation of capital equipment used in our hosted network, cost of support for the third-party software and lease costs paid to remote co-location centers. Cost of support and services was

20

Table of Contents

$6.5 million, $8.7 million and $16.0 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The significant decrease in fiscal years 2003 and 2004 was primarily due to the reduction in worldwide workforce, a decline in outside contractor services and co-location lease costs as well as the migration of resources to eGain India. Our occupancy costs and related overhead were also reduced due to the consolidation of excess facilities, the asset write-offs related to the reduction of work force and the closure of offices in fiscal year 2002 and fiscal year 2003. We do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease in cost of support and services in fiscal year 2005.

Cost of Revenue—Acquisition Related

Cost of revenue—acquisition related costs was $0, $827,000 and $1.4 million in fiscal year 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to a discontinuance of the amortization of acquired workforce intangibles that was reclassified to goodwill as of July 1, 2002 in accordance with SFAS 142. These amounts consisted of amortization of developed technology resulting from our business combinations in fiscal year 2000. The acquired developed technology intangibles were fully amortized in the quarter ended March 31, 2003.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses primarily consist of compensation and benefits for our engineering, product management and quality assurance personnel and, to a lesser extent, occupancy costs and related overhead. Research and development expense was $2.9 million, $5.9 million and $11.4 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decreases in fiscal year 2003 and 2004 were primarily due to a decline in outside contractor services and the migration of development resources to eGain India. Our occupancy costs and related overhead were also reduced due to the consolidation of excess facilities, the asset write-offs related to the reduction of work force and the closure of offices in fiscal year 2002 and fiscal year 2003. We do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease in research and development expenses in fiscal year 2005.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of compensation and benefits for our sales, marketing and business development personnel, advertising, trade show and other promotional costs and, to a lesser extent, occupancy costs and related overhead. Sales and marketing expense was $8.3 million, $9.6 million and $25.1 million in fiscal year 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decreases in fiscal year 2003 and 2004 were primarily due to a decline in headcount through planned workforce reductions to reflect a tough market and internal reorganization and a decrease in spending on advertising and marketing programs. The reduced sales-related expenses in fiscal year 2003 and 2004 included personnel costs, commission and travel expenses. Our occupancy costs and related overhead were also reduced due to the consolidation of excess facilities. We do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease in sales and marketing expenses in fiscal 2005.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses primarily consist of compensation and benefits for our finance, human resources, administrative and legal services personnel, fees for outside professional services, provision for doubtful accounts and, to a lesser extent, occupancy costs and related overhead. General and administrative expense was $3.4 million, $4.8 million and $8.9 million in fiscal year 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decreases in fiscal 2003 and 2004 were primarily due to a decline in headcount through increased efficiencies, migration of certain accounting and human resource functions to India, the reduction in professional services fees related to the change in accounting firm, reduced depreciation expense due to assets being fully depreciated, the discontinuance of certain software maintenance contracts and a significant decrease in bad debt expense. The bad debt expense was $21,000, $(103,000) and $1.8 million in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease was due to the improvement in our collection efforts, the quality of customer base and an overall reduction in accounts receivables. Our occupancy costs and related overhead were also reduced due to the consolidation of excess facilities. We do not anticipate a significant increase or decrease in general and administrative expenses in fiscal 2005.

21

Table of Contents

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS 141 “Business Combinations” and SFAS 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS 141 requires business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. SFAS 141 also included guidance on the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets arising from business combinations and includes criteria that required intangible assets such as assembled workforce to be recognized as part of goodwill. As of July 1, 2002, eGain reclassified $750,000 of assembled workforce from intangibles to goodwill.

Effective July 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS No. 142 and ceased amortization of goodwill and began reviewing it annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment. In addition, we evaluated our remaining purchased intangible assets to determine that all such assets have determinable lives. We operate under a single reporting unit and accordingly, all of our goodwill is associated with the entire company. Prior to the adoption of SFA No. 142, we amortized goodwill on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of three years. The purchased intangible assets including customer base and acquired technology are being amortized over the assets estimated useful life, which ranges from three to four years. The amortizable intangibles were fully amortized in fiscal year 2004 and remaining intangibles are for goodwill only.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets

In connection with the transitional goodwill impairment evaluation provisions of SFAS 142, we performed a goodwill impairment review with the assistance of a third party valuation firm as of July 1, 2002 and found no impairment. We also performed our annual goodwill impairment review with the assistance of a third party valuation firm as of April 1, 2004 and April 1, 2003 and found no impairment.

As of July 1, 2002, in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”), we review long-lived assets, including property and equipment and intangible assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Under SFAS 144, an impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. Impairment, if any, is assessed using discounted cash flows. During fiscal 2004 and 2003, we did not have any such losses.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2002, in accordance with SFAS No. 121, we determined that impairment indicators were present and therefore evaluated the carrying value of our goodwill and other intangible assets. The evaluation was based on a cash flow forecast for five years ending June 30, 2007, and discounted at the rate of 34%, which represented our estimated weighted average cost of capital. As a result of the evaluation, we concluded that the book value of long-lived assets exceeded fair value by $36.8 million and accordingly, this amount was charged to operations as impairment of long-lived assets in the fourth quarter of 2002.

Valuation and Amortization of Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is recorded in connection with grants of stock options to employees on the date of grant when the deemed fair value of the underlying common stock exceeds the exercise price for stock options. Stock-based compensation is amortized on a graded vesting method over the vesting period of the individual grants. In addition, we record compensation expense in connection with grants of stock options to non-employees pursuant to “Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). These grants are periodically revalued as they vest in accordance with SFAS 123 and EITF 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” We recorded amortization of stock-based compensation of $0, $157,000 and $1.0 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

22

Table of Contents

Restructuring and Other Expense

Net restructuring expense was $186,000, $620,000 and $9.0 million in fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Other income was $163,000 in fiscal year 2004 and related to the gain on disposal of fixed assets. There was no other expense recorded in fiscal years 2003 and 2002.

Beginning in fiscal 2001 and continuing through the first quarter of fiscal 2004, economic conditions in North America and many of the other countries in which we operate either deteriorated or stabilized at depressed levels. This continuing weak economic environment, and in particular spending in technology, has had an adverse impact on sales of enterprise software. As a result, we have seen a decline in our revenues over the last three fiscal years. In response to this decline, we initiated a series of steps to streamline operations and better align operating costs and expenses with revenue trends. Specifically this included establishing restructuring plans in fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004.

Fiscal 2004 plan

In fiscal year 2004, the total restructuring charge relating to the Fiscal 2004 Plan was $80,000. This charge related to workforce reductions in Europe and was completed and paid in full in fiscal 2004.

In addition, during fiscal 2004 we made provisional adjustments to both Fiscal 2003 and Fiscal 2002 Plans as follows:

23

Table of Contents

The total payments in fiscal year 2004 of $1.2 million consisted of $80,000, $336,000, $725,000 and $92,000 of expenses accrued in Fiscal 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 Plans, respectively.

Fiscal 2003 Plan

In fiscal year 2003, the total restructuring charge relating to the Fiscal 2003 Plan was $2.3 million. The $2.3 million expense included $772,000 related to the closure of local offices in Holland, France, Germany, Australia and Singapore, $225,000 for additional consolidation of excess facilities in North America, $1.2 million in employee severance payments and $61,000 in professional services and miscellaneous charges related to the restructuring. Both the employee severance and professional charges have been paid in full in fiscal year 2003. We expect to pay the remaining balance of restructuring accrual related to excess facilities by the end of fiscal year 2006.

In addition, during fiscal 2003 we made a provisional adjustment to the Fiscal 2002 Plan by reversing $1.7 million, previously recorded as a restructuring expense in fiscal 2002. The reversal related to the early termination of a facility lease agreement in Sunnyvale, California.

The total payments of $3.3 million in fiscal year 2003 consisted of $1.9 million, $1.4 million and $40,000 of expenses accrued in fiscal year 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The $1.9 million included $1.3 million for employee severance payments, professional services and miscellaneous charges related to the restructuring and $613,000 for excess worldwide facilities recorded in fiscal year 2003.

Fiscal 2002 Plan

In fiscal year 2002, the total restructuring charge relating to the Fiscal 2002 Plan was $9.0 million. These charges included $6.4 million for the consolidation of our facilities in North America, $1.3 million in write-offs of leasehold improvement and $15,000 in professional services and miscellaneous charges associated with the exited facilities. In addition, we recorded a total severance charge of $1.2 million that was primarily due to the reduction in worldwide workforce of 190 employees across all departments. Both of the employee severance and professional charges have been paid in full in fiscal year 2002.

Total payments of $4.0 million in fiscal year 2002 consisted of $1.5 million for excess facilities in North America, $1.3 million in write-offs of leasehold improvement and $1.2 million in employee severance, professional services and miscellaneous charges accrued in the same fiscal year. Of the total payments, $88,000 was applied to the excess facilities accrued in the Fiscal 2001 Plan.

At the end of fiscal year 2004, the remaining accrual for the Fiscal 2002 Plan includes estimated contingent payments related to two lease settlements for excess facilities that were originally included in the Fiscal 2002 Plan. As part of separate settlement agreements with the two landlords, in the event we make a distribution of cash, stock or other consideration to holders of our Series A Preferred with respect to the shares of Series A Preferred held by such Series A Preferred holders, each of the two landlords would receive a payment equal to the lesser of (i) $1.0 million or (ii) the amount payable to a holder of shares of Series A Preferred with an aggregate stated value of $1.0 million. At the end of fiscal year 2004, we estimated the combined value of these two contingent payments to be $1.2 million.

Fiscal 2001 Plan

In fiscal year 2001, the total restructuring charge relating to the Fiscal 2001 Plan was $1.4 million. These charges primarily related to a reduction in our worldwide workforce of 141 employees across all departments and office closures in North America pursuant to the adoption of our expense management strategy. The total charges were primarily comprised of $917,000 related to severance costs, $263,000 related to office closure costs and $263,000 related to professional services and miscellaneous charges associated with the employee terminations. Total payments of $1.2 million were made in fiscal year 2001. This plan was completed and paid in full as of June 30, 2004.

24

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth an analysis of the restructuring accrual activity for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):