Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the Quarterly Period Ended: July 31, 2004

For the Transition Period from              to             

Commission file number 0-26714

ADE CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

80 Wilson Way, Westwood, Massachusetts 02090

(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)

(781) 467-3500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements:

ADE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share data, unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands, unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Preparation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of ADE Corporation (the “Company”) include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods indicated. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those to be achieved for full fiscal years.

Pursuant to accounting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and these notes do not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for complete financial statements. Accordingly, these statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004.

2. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:

3. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

6

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

4. Assets Held for Sale

In February 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan to sell the Company’s Newton, Massachusetts property, which housed the Company’s ATI subsidiary. The operations of ATI were relocated to the Company’s Westwood, Massachusetts facility during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. The Company listed the property for sale and actively looked for a buyer. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (“SFAS 144”), “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the Company classified the assets associated with the Newton property as “Available for Sale” and ceased depreciation on the assets. As required by SFAS 144, in order to classify this property as “Available for Sale,” it must be probable that it will be sold within one year unless certain criteria are met. Since the Newton property was listed for sale, the real estate market for industrial properties in the Boston area has been sluggish. The Company responded to these market conditions by decreasing the asking price of the property and recorded charges of $378,000 during the prior fiscal year to general and administrative expenses to reduce the net carrying value of the assets to the fair value less the cost to sell the property. The fair value of the property was determined by the Company’s best estimate of the current market value of the property as a result of negotiations with potential buyers since the property was listed for sale. On June 25, 2004, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with a buyer for the Newton property. The Company expects that the transaction will close in the fall of 2004. The selling price of the property, less selling costs, is approximately equal to the net book value of the property.

5. Intangible Assets

The Company has capitalized license fees for software included in the Company’s products. These license fees are amortized at the greater of 1) the ratio that current gross revenue for the related products bears to the total current and anticipated future gross revenue for those products or 2) on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the related products. The carrying amount and accumulated amortization for the Company’s intangible assets are as follows:

Amortization expense was $38,000 for the three months ended July 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Estimated amortization is $234,000, $318,000 and $134,000 for the fiscal years ending April 30, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

7

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

6. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

7. Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based compensation awards to employees under the Company’s stock plans are accounted for using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. The Company has adopted the disclosures required by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation.” Had compensation cost for the stock-based compensation been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates of awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts as follows:

8

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

8. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. For the three months ended July 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, 257,560 and 941,515 common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share, as their effect would have been antidilutive because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market value of the Company’s stock during the three months ended July 31, 2004.

The following is a reconciliation of the shares used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share:

9. Segment Reporting

The Company has three reportable segments: ADE Semiconductor Systems Group (“SSG”), ADE Phase Shift (“PST”) and ADE Technologies (“ATI”). SSG manufactures and markets metrology and inspection systems to the semiconductor wafer and device manufacturing industries that are used to improve yield and capital productivity. Sales of the Company’s stand-alone software products are also included in the SSG segment. PST manufactures and markets high performance, non-contact surface metrology equipment using advanced interferometric technology that provides enhanced yield management to the data storage, semiconductor and optics industries. ATI manufactures and markets high precision magnetic characterization and non-contact dimensional metrology gauging systems primarily to the data storage industry.

The Company’s reportable segments are determined based upon the nature of the products, the external customers and customer industries and the sales and distribution methods used to market the products. The Company evaluates performance based upon profit or loss from operations. The Company does not measure the assets allocated to the segments. Management fees representing certain services provided by corporate offices have been allocated to each of the reportable segments based upon the usage of those services by each segment. Additionally, other income (loss), the provision for (benefit from) income taxes and the equity in net earnings (loss) of affiliated companies are not included in segment profitability. For the reportable segments, intersegment sales are recorded at cost plus 20% and are eliminated in consolidation.

9

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

9. Segment Reporting (Continued)

The following is a reconciliation for the above items where aggregate reportable segment amounts differ from amounts contained in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

10

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Pending Litigation

On October 12, 2000, the Company filed a patent infringement lawsuit against KLA-Tencor Corporation (“KLA”), a competitor, in United States District Court in Delaware. In the suit, the Company seeks damages and a permanent injunction against further infringement of United States Patent Numbers 6,118,525 and 6,292,259, both entitled “Wafer Inspection System for Distinguishing Pits and Particles.” KLA responded by filing counterclaims alleging that the Company has infringed four patents owned by KLA. KLA seeks damages for the alleged patent infringement and a permanent injunction against future infringement. In addition, KLA seeks a declaration that United States Patent Numbers 6,118,525 and 6,292,259, owned by the Company, are invalid and not infringed by KLA. On March 13, 2003, the District Court issued a ruling upholding KLA’s principal arguments with respect to ADE’s claims of infringement. On August 15, 2003, the District Court issued rulings upholding ADE’s principal arguments with respect to KLA’s claims of infringement for two of KLA’s asserted patents. On February 4, 2004, a jury in the United States District Court in Delaware returned a verdict in favor of ADE invalidating all the remaining claims asserted by KLA. A final judgment has now been issued by the court in ADE’s favor on all of KLA’s counterclaims. The Company has appealed some of the District Court’s rulings to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Accordingly, at this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome or the amount of gain or loss, if any, from this lawsuit.

On October 18, 2002, a former employee of the Company filed a civil action against the Company in Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County, alleging that the Company breached his employment contract with the Company and seeking damages of approximately $500,000. The Company has filed an answer to the former employee’s complaint denying his allegations, and believes that the former employee’s claim lacks merit. The Company has also filed counterclaims against the employee. On July 15, 2003, the former employee amended his complaint to add related allegations and to add Dr. Koliopoulos and Mr. James as individual defendants. The Company and the individual defendants plan to defend the civil action charges vigorously. Since the matters are at a preliminary stage, the Company is unable to predict the outcome or amount of the related expense, or loss, if any, associated with this litigation. However, the Company believes that a portion of the related expenses or losses will be covered under the Company’s insurance policies.

In addition to the matters noted above, from time to time the Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate expense with respect to any other current legal proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Guarantor agreements

The Company has an agreement with a vendor whereby it guarantees the expenses incurred by certain of the Company’s employees. The term of the agreement is from execution until cancellation and payment of any outstanding amounts. The Company would be required to pay any unsettled employee expenses upon notification from the vendor. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under this agreement is not significant. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, no liabilities have been recorded for this guaranty as of July 31, 2004.

Pursuant to one of the provisions in the Company’s standard terms and conditions of sale, the Company agrees, subject to certain limitations and conditions, to defend any suit or proceeding brought against a customer based on a claim that the Company’s equipment, standing alone, infringes a United States patent or copyright or misappropriates a trade secret protected under United States law. Actions arising under such provision may only be brought by customers within two years after the cause of action arises. The maximum potential amount of payments the Company may be required to make under such provision is limited to the total purchase price of the Company’s equipment sold under the particular contract. The Company has never incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these customer contract provisions. As a result, the Company believes the estimated exposure of these provisions is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these provisions as of July 31, 2004.

11

Table of Contents

ADE CORPORATION

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

The Company warrants that its products will perform in all material respects in accordance with its standard published specifications. The term of the Company’s standard warranty is 12 months. The Company accrues 2% or 3% of product revenues, based on history, to provide for estimated warranty costs, depending on which business unit made the sale. The following is a reconciliation of the quarterly activity in the Company’s warranty liability for the three months ended July 31, 2004 and 2003.

12

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:

Introduction

ADE Corporation (the “Company”) designs, manufactures, markets and services highly precise, automated measurement, defect detection and handling equipment with current applications in the production of semiconductor wafers, semiconductor devices and magnetic computer disks. The Company operates three major business segments, the Semiconductor Systems Group (“SSG”), ADE Phase Shift (“PST”) and ADE Technologies (“ATI”). SSG manufactures multifunctional semiconductor metrology and automation systems and optical wafer defect inspection equipment used to detect particles and other defects on silicon wafer surfaces primarily for the semiconductor wafer and device manufacturing industries. PST manufactures high-performance, non-contact surface metrology equipment using advanced interferometric technology that provides enhanced yield management to the data storage, semiconductor and optics industries. ATI manufactures high precision magnetic characterization and non-contact dimensional metrology gauging systems primarily for the data storage industry.

Historically, the semiconductor wafer and device industries and the magnetic data storage industry have been highly cyclical and have experienced both rapid periods of growth and rapid downturns that can be abrupt and result in significant changes in revenue and profits. During an industry wide downturn, the demand for capital equipment significantly decreases as the Company’s customers reduce production of semiconductor wafers and devices. Beginning in fiscal year 2002, the Company experienced decreased demand for its products in all business segments as a result of the downturn in the semiconductor wafer and device manufacturing industries as well as the data storage industry. Consequently, the Company experienced reduced order levels and revenues during fiscal year 2002 and early fiscal 2003. In response to the industry downturn, the Company underwent cost reduction measures, including headcount reductions, and focused its research and development activities on projects to place the Company in the best possible position for the next wave of capital spending in the semiconductor wafer and device manufacturing industries as well as the magnetic data storage industry. Beginning in the second half of fiscal year 2003 and continuing through the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company has experienced steady increases in quarterly orders, revenue and backlog. As a result, the Company has achieved profitability, on a quarterly basis, since the third quarter of fiscal year 2003. These results were due in part to increased order activity from Asia during fiscal years 2003, 2004 and the first quarter of fiscal 2005 as well as the aforementioned cost reduction measures. However, the Company makes no assurances that the order, revenue, backlog and profit levels can be sustained in future periods.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this quarterly report and the audited consolidated financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004.

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains statements which constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Federal securities laws. Statements that make reference to the Company’s expectations, predictions and anticipations are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed by such statements and should be considered forward-looking statements. These statements include, but are not limited to, expectations about the Company’s performance in the second quarter of fiscal 2005, risks and uncertainties associated with the strength of the semiconductor and magnetic data storage markets, wafer pricing and wafer demand, the results of product development efforts, the success of the Company’s product offerings in meeting customer needs within the timeframes required by customers in these markets, further increases in backlog, the Company’s visibility, the Company’s ability to maintain current gross profit levels, developments in the Company’s ongoing litigation with KLA-Tencor Corporation (“KLA”) and its predictions of future financial outcomes. Subject to applicable law, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information on potential factors that could affect the Company’s business is described in “Other Risk Factors and Trends” appearing at the end of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in the Company’s reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2004.

13

Table of Contents

Restructurings

During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, as a result of continued cost cutting initiatives, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $393,000, which consisted primarily of severance expenses for 20 terminated employees. The employees were terminated from various functional areas within the Company’s Semiconductor Systems and ADE Technologies business segments. The majority of all the severance payments from the first quarter restructuring were made by the end of fiscal year 2004. In connection with the first quarter restructuring, the Company did not renew its lease at its Bethel, Connecticut facility, which expired in August 2003. Prior to the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the operations of the Bethel facility were relocated to the Westwood, Massachusetts and Tucson, Arizona facilities.

Sale of Long-term Investment

On July 24, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the majority of its 50% ownership in Japan ADE, Ltd. (“JAL”) to Kanematsu Electronics, Ltd., the other 50% owner of JAL. The Company received proceeds of $4.0 million and realized a gain of $1.7 million from this transaction. The Company retained a 9% ownership interest in JAL. Prior to the transaction, the Company accounted for its investment in JAL under the equity method. As a result of the decrease in both ownership and influence over the affairs of JAL, the Company accounts for its remaining 9% interest under the cost method.

The $1.7 million gain on the transaction was calculated as follows:

Prior to July 24, 2003, when the Company was accounting for its investment in JAL under the equity method, the revenue from sales to JAL, which had not in turn been sold by JAL to unrelated third parties, was eliminated and the related profit on such sales was recorded as deferred income on sales to affiliate. As a result of the reduction of the Company’s 50% investment in JAL to 9% and the change in accounting method for the remaining investment to the cost method, the Company recognized approximately $6.4 million of system and parts revenue in its statement of operations that otherwise may have been deferred revenue on the balance sheet as of July 31, 2003. Cost of revenue, systems and parts in the statement of operations increased by $2.5 million during the quarter ended July 31, 2003 as a result of the sale of part of the Company’s JAL investment. Therefore, gross profit in the statement of operations increased by $3.9 million during the same period.

14

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies, Significant Judgments and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon its consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure at the date of the Company’s financial statements. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, income taxes, and warranty obligations. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company considers certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition and allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, accounting for income taxes, valuation of goodwill and software and the accounting for leases to be critical policies due to the estimates and judgments involved in each.

Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company’s revenue recognition policy complies with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”), “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. The Company’s standard customer arrangement includes a signed purchase order, in which it offers payment terms of 30 to 90 days, no right of return of delivered products and a twelve month warranty. The Company assesses whether the fee associated with its revenue transactions is fixed or determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction. If a significant portion of the fee is due after the Company’s normal payment terms, 30 to 90 days, it determines that the fee is not fixed or determinable. In these cases, the Company recognizes revenue as the fees become due. The Company assesses collectibility based on the credit worthiness of the customer and past transaction history. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and does not require collateral from its customers. For many of the Company’s international customers, it requires that an irrevocable letter of credit be issued by the customer before the purchase order is accepted. If the Company determines that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, it defers the fee and recognizes the revenue at the time that collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon the receipt of cash.

For some of the Company’s sales transactions, a portion, usually 10%, of the fee is not due until installation occurs and the customer accepts the product. The other 90% of the fee is normally due 30 to 90 days after shipment. If the Company has met defined customer acceptance experience levels with a specific type of product, these transactions are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements with the deferral of the portion of the fee not due until installation is complete and customer acceptance has occurred. Management of the Company must make a determination of what constitutes an appropriate experience level with a product. This determination is based on, but not limited to, the extent to which a product contains significantly new technology, the number of similarly configured products previously delivered and the Company’s experience with a particular customer. For new products, the Company must obtain at least three acceptances before it will recognize the 90% portion of the fee upon shipment. All other sales with customer acceptance provisions are recognized as revenue upon customer acceptance. The portion of the fee related to the installation of the product and customer training is classified as service revenue.

The Company’s transactions frequently involve the sales of systems and services under multiple element arrangements. Revenue under multiple element arrangements is allocated to all elements except systems based upon the fair value of those elements. The amounts allocated to training are based upon the price charged when this element is sold separately and unaccompanied by the other elements. The amount allocated to installation revenue is based upon hourly rates and the estimated time to complete the service. The amount allocated to system and parts is done on a residual method basis. Under this method, the total arrangement value is allocated first to undelivered elements, based on their fair values, with the remainder being allocated to system revenue.

15

Table of Contents

The Company accrues for anticipated warranty costs upon shipment. Service revenue is recognized as the services are performed provided collection of the related receivable is probable. Service contract revenue is recognized ratably over the contractual periods in which the services are provided. Revenue from software licenses is recognized when an agreement has been executed, software has been delivered, fees are fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is probable.

Revenue from systems sales to JAL, the Company’s previously 50% owned affiliate and a distributor of the Company’s products, by the SSG, ATI and PST segments has been reflected in segment revenue during the period they were shipped by the respective segment, which could differ from the period the revenue was recognized for consolidated financial reporting purposes. Consolidated revenue on systems sales to JAL was recognized when the related product or software was shipped to and accepted by the end user of the product or software. As a result of the Company’s decreased investment in JAL, since July 24, 2003, all sales to JAL have been reflected in both segment and consolidated revenue in the same period.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a continuous review of customer accounts, payment patterns and specific collection issues. Where specific collection issues are identified, the Company records a specific allowance based on the amount that the Company believes will be collected. For accounts where specific collection issues are not identified, the Company will record a reserve based on the age of the receivable and historical collection patterns.

Inventory Valuation

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, cost being determined on a first-in, first-out basis. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory on a monthly basis. The Company’s policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods and spare parts. Inventory that, in the judgment of management, is obsolete or in excess of the Company’s estimated usage is written-down to its estimated market value, if less than its cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are management’s estimates related to current economic trends, future demand for the Company’s products, and technological obsolescence. Significant management judgments must be made when establishing the reserve for obsolete and excess inventory. If the Company’s judgments and estimates relating to obsolete and excess inventory prove to be inadequate, its financial results could be materially adversely affected in future periods. If the inventory value is written down to its net realizable value, and subsequently there is an increased demand for the inventory at a higher value, the increased value of the inventory is not realized until the inventory is sold.

Accounting for Income Taxes

The Company records income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The Company’s financial statements contain certain deferred tax assets, which have arisen primarily as a result of operating losses incurred in prior years, as well as other temporary differences between book and tax accounting. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” requires the establishment of a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of the realization of deferred tax assets. Significant management judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, its deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against its net deferred tax assets. The Company evaluates the weight of all available evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. As of July 31, 2004, the Company has a valuation allowance against the full amount of its deferred tax assets. The Company recorded a full valuation allowance during fiscal 2002. The decision to record the valuation allowance required significant judgment. Had the Company not recorded this allowance, it would have reported materially different results. If the realization of deferred tax assets in the future is considered more likely than not, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase net income in the period such determination was made. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable is based on

16

Table of Contents

significant estimates, and it is at least reasonably possible that changes in these estimates in the near term could materially affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. If the Company continues to generate profits in fiscal 2005, it is possible that all, or a portion, of the valuation allowance will be released in fiscal 2005. The Company’s effective tax rate may vary from period to period based on changes in estimated taxable income or loss, changes to the valuation allowance, changes to federal, state or foreign tax laws, and deductibility of certain costs and expenses by jurisdiction.

Valuation of Goodwill and Software

Intangible assets consist of $1.3 million of goodwill obtained through the acquisition of the Semiconductor Solutions Division of LPA Software, Inc. (“SSD”) in September 1997 as well as $0.6 million, net of amortization, of capitalized license fees for software included in the Company’s products. In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS 142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” which was effective for the Company on May 1, 2002. SFAS 142 requires, among other things, the discontinuance of goodwill amortization and includes provisions for the reclassification of certain existing recognized intangibles as goodwill, reassessment of the useful lives of existing recognized intangibles, and reclassification of certain intangibles out of previously reported goodwill. In accordance with this statement, the Company discontinued the amortization of its net goodwill of $1.3 million on May 1, 2002. In addition, the Company was required to perform a transitional impairment test for goodwill under SFAS 142. The impairment test under SFAS 142 uses a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with the unit’s carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit is greater than fair value, the unit’s goodwill may be impaired, and the second step must be completed to measure the amount of the goodwill impairment charge, if any. In the second step, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is compared with the carrying amount of the unit’s goodwill. If the carrying amount is greater than the implied fair value, the carrying value of the goodwill must be written down to its implied fair value.

The Company is required to perform impairment tests under SFAS 142 annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the goodwill may be impaired. Factors the Company considers important that could trigger the impairment review include:

Net capitalized license fees of $0.6 million for software included in the Company’s products are amortized at the greater of 1) the ratio that current gross revenue for the related products bears to the total current and anticipated future gross revenue for those products or 2) on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. At each quarter-end, the carrying value of the software is compared to net realizable value (“NRV”). NRV is the estimated future gross revenues from products that incorporate the software reduced by the estimated future costs of disposal. If NRV is less than the carrying value, the excess is written-off and NRV becomes the new carrying value of the software.

Significant management judgments and estimates must be made when establishing criteria for future cash flows, estimating reporting unit fair value and assessing impairment. If the Company’s judgments and estimates relating to goodwill and software prove to be inadequate, an asset may be determined to be impaired and the Company’s financial results could be materially adversely impacted. Likewise, if a future event or circumstance indicates that an impairment assessment is required and, through the performance of that assessment, an asset is determined to be impaired, the Company’s financial results could be materially and adversely impacted in future periods.

17

Table of Contents

Accounting for Leases

On July 29, 2003, the Company entered into a lease agreement for its corporate headquarters in Westwood, Massachusetts. The classification of this lease as an operating lease involved a significant judgement by the Company’s management with respect to the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. At the date of lease inception, the incremental borrowing rate is a significant element of the calculation in one of the four tests that must be performed to determine if a lease should be classified as an operating lease or a capital lease. The Company’s management determined the Company’s incremental borrowing rate based on an analysis of its negotiations with various financial institutions, the implicit interest rate in the lease for the Westwood, Massachusetts building and an estimate of the current yield on debt financing of comparable companies in the public securities markets. Because the criteria necessary for classification as a capital lease were not met, the lease was accounted for as an operating lease and the leased building and related liability have not been recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. If the Company’s incremental borrowing rate was determined to be lower than what was determined by the Company’s management, the lease could have met the criteria for classification as a capital lease, which would have resulted in an asset of approximately $8.6 million and a liability of approximately $8.6 million being recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at July 31, 2003.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has not created, and is not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating parts of its business that are not consolidated into its financial statements. The Company does not have any arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into its financial statements that are reasonably likely to materially affect its liquidity or the availability of capital resources, except as set forth below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

18

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended July 31, 2004 compared to Three Months Ended July 31, 2003

Systems and parts revenue. Systems and parts revenue increased 50% to $25.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 from $16.9 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Systems and parts revenue in the SSG segment increased 59% to $17.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to $10.8 million in the year earlier period. The increase in revenues from the Company’s products in the SSG segment was due to increased demand for the Company’s products, particularly in Asia, as semiconductor wafer manufacturers have increased capacity in their production of both 200mm and 300mm wafers. System and parts revenue in the PST segment increased 26% to $5.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to $4.4 million in the year earlier period. The increase in revenue from the PST segment was due primarily to increased demand for its products in the semiconductor device and data storage industries. Given the high dollar value of individual shipments, shipping one less or one more system in a quarter can have a significant impact on the reported revenues for one of the Company’s business segments, particularly the PST segment.

The data storage industry has experienced extreme pricing pressure, consolidation and excess supply in many data storage market segments, which has resulted in reduced production and capital equipment purchases. More recently, the data storage industry has shown increased interest in the Company’s magnetic data storage industry products. Consequently, system and parts revenue from the products that are marketed to the data storage industry by the Company’s ATI segment increased 90% to $2.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to $1.5 million in the year earlier period. The increase can be attributed primarily to an increase in sales of ATI’s magnetics products.

For the second quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company expects consolidated revenue, which consists primarily of revenue from the semiconductor industry, to increase by a range of 2 to 8% from first quarter revenue. The Company expects second quarter consolidated gross profit to be in the range of 51% to 53%. However, the Company can make no assurances that the expected increase in revenue or the expected gross profit will occur or, if it does, that it can be sustained for the remainder of fiscal year 2005.

The Company’s total revenue by industry is distributed as follows:

The Company’s total revenue by region is distributed as follows:

19

Table of Contents

Revenue from Japan decreased to 45% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to 63% in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The decrease was due primarily to the fact that the Company recognized revenue of $6.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 as a result of the Company’s sale of the majority of its then 50% ownership in JAL that may otherwise have been deferred revenue on the balance sheet as of July 31, 2003. Because JAL was an equity method investee prior to the sale on July 24, 3003, revenue from sales to JAL, which had not in turn been sold by JAL to unrelated third parties, was deferred. The change from the equity method to the cost method of accounting for the JAL investment resulted in the recognition of all deferred revenue from sales to JAL as of the date of the sale of the majority of ADE’s interest in JAL.

Service revenue. Service revenue increased 36% to $3.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to $2.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The Company’s service revenue consists of fees for installation, training, product maintenance and technical support services. The majority of the Company’s service revenue is derived from the SSG segment. The increase is primarily due to service calls related to customers bringing equipment back on-line to increase capacity.

Gross profit – systems and parts. Gross profit on systems and parts increased to 56% in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 from 52% in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. Gross profit increased in all three of the Company’s segments. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to continuing improvements in cost controls and efficiencies and changes in product and geographical sales mix.

Gross profit – service. Gross profit from service increased to 27% in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to (10%) in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The increased gross profit was the result of both increased revenues related to service calls and decreased material and repair costs compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

Research and development. Research and development expense decreased by $0.1 million, or 2%, to $3.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 from $3.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and decreased as a percentage of revenue to 13% compared to 19% in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The Company continues to invest in its semiconductor wafer and device industry products as well as new products for the magnetic storage industry, including those that measure the magnetic properties of materials used in manufacturing disk drives. The decrease in expense as a percentage of revenues reflects the increased revenue mentioned above. The Company expects research and development expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 to increase slightly on a dollar basis, however, it is expected to be consistent with the first quarter at approximately 13% of revenue.

Marketing and sales. Marketing and sales expense increased $1.5 million, or 73%, to $3.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 from $2.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and increased to 12% as a percentage of revenue compared to 11% the first quarter of 2004. The increased expense resulted primarily from an increase in external commissions expense due to an increase in sales made through external sales representatives compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The mix of sales channels through which the Company’s products are sold may have a significant impact on the Company’s marketing and sales expense and the results in any period may not be indicative of marketing and sales expense for future periods. The Company expects marketing and sales expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 to be consistent on a percentage basis with the first quarter.

General and administrative. General and administrative expense increased $0.5 million, or 23%, to $2.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 from $2.2 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and decreased as a percentage of revenue to 9% from 11% in the first quarter of 2004. Expense increased primarily as a result of an increase in payroll related expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared with the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The Company expects general and administrative expense to be approximately 9% of revenues in the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

Interest expense. Interest expense was $52,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to interest expense of $253,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the Company’s retirement of its 1996 and 1997 Industrial Development Bonds at the end of first quarter of fiscal 2004.

20

Table of Contents

Income taxes. The provision for income taxes was $148,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to a provision for income taxes of $88,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. The provision for income taxes consists of federal and state alternative minimum taxes and foreign income taxes. The Company has a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets at July 31, 2004. Significant management judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, its deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against its net deferred tax assets. The Company evaluates the weight of all available evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. If the realization of deferred tax assets in the future is considered more likely than not, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would increase net income in the period such determination was made. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable is based on significant estimates, and it is at least reasonably possible that changes in these estimates in the near term could materially affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. If the Company continues to generate profits in fiscal 2005, it is possible that all, or a portion, of the valuation allowance will be released in fiscal 2005.

Equity in net earnings of affiliated companies. Equity in net earnings of affiliated companies was $0 in the first quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to $48,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. As of July 24, 2003, as a result of the reduction of the Company’s 50% investment in JAL to 9%, and the change in accounting method from the equity method to the cost method, the Company no longer records JAL’s earnings in its statement of operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At July 31, 2004, the Company had $46.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and $78.6 million in working capital. In addition, the Company had $0.6 million in restricted cash used as a security deposit for the Company’s lease of its Westwood, Massachusetts headquarters.

Cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended July 31, 2004 was $4.4 million. This amount resulted from net income of $5.1 million adjusted for non-cash charges of $0.6 million and a $1.2 million net change in working capital accounts. Non-cash items consisted primarily of $0.6 million of depreciation and amortization. Working capital items consisted primarily of increases in accounts receivable of $1.4 million, inventories of $0.5 million, accounts payable of $0.1 million, accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $0.9 million and prepaid expenses and other current assets of $0.3 million. The increase in accounts receivable was due to increased shipments during the first quarter of fiscal 2005, particularly in the last month of the quarter. The increase in inventory was due to increased production in response to the increase in customer orders. The increase in accounts payable was primarily due to increased purchases of inventory. The increase in accrued expenses and other current liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accrued salaries, wages, vacation pay and incentive compensation.

Cash used in investing activities for the three months ended July 31, 2004 was $0.1 million, and consisted primarily of $0.1 million in purchases of fixed assets.

Cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended July 31, 2004 was $0.3 million, which consisted of $0.4 million of aggregate proceeds from the issuance of common stock from the exercise of stock options and stock purchased through the Company’s employee stock purchase plan. These proceeds were slightly offset by $41,000 of principal repayments of long-term debt.

The Company’s Newton, Massachusetts facility was listed for sale in February 2003. On July 31, 2003, the Company retired the 1997 Industrial Development Bond (“IDB”), which was used to finance the acquisition of this property. On June 25, 2004, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with a buyer for the Newton property. The Company expects that the transaction will close in the fall of 2004. The selling price for the property, less selling costs, is approximately equal to the net book value of the property of $4.3 million at July 31, 2004. The Company anticipates that the cash proceeds from this sale will be used for general corporate purposes.

21

Table of Contents

On July 22, 2004, the Company entered into a Standby Letter of Credit Agreement with Fleet National Bank in the amount of $4.5 million. One letter of credit issued under this facility serves as collateral for the $3.9 million principal balance on Company’s Industrial Development Bond issued through the Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima, Arizona and replaces a letter of credit the Company had with another financial institution. Another letter of credit under this facility serves as collateral along with a $0.6 million cash security deposit required by the lease agreement for the Company’s Westwood, Massachusetts headquarters building. The facility bears a fee of 1.5% per annum of the face amount of each letter of credit. Under the terms of the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Company is required to comply with certain financial covenants. As of July 31, 2004, the Company is in compliance with these covenants.

Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America, certain obligations and commitments are not required to be included in the consolidated balance sheet. These obligations and commitments, while entered into in the normal course of business, may have a material impact on liquidity. The Company does not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, the Company is not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if the Company had engaged in such relationships. The following table discloses the Company’s contractual payment obligations as of July 31, 2004. The operating lease and consulting agreement obligations are not included in the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in “Item 1. Financial Information.” The principal portion of the long-term debt is included in the unaudited consolidated financial statements. The long-term debt payments in the table below include both principal and interest. The unconditional purchase order obligations primarily represent open purchase orders for inventory, a significant portion of which is necessary to produce and ship orders from the Company’s backlog.

The Company expects to meet its near-term working capital needs and capital expenditures primarily through available cash and cash equivalents, which will primarily be generated from sales to both existing and new customers. However, the Company can provide no assurance that it will be able to maintain its current customer base or acquire new customers.

Other Risk Factors and Trends

Capital expenditures by semiconductor wafer and device manufacturers historically have been cyclical as they in turn depend upon the current and anticipated demand for integrated circuits. While the semiconductor industry appears to have emerged from the most recent severe down cycle, it is not clear what the duration or extent of this recovery will be to semiconductor wafer manufacturers, who have historically accounted for approximately 70%—80% of the Company’s revenue. The data storage industry has been in a period of oversupply and excess manufacturing capacity for an extended period of time and this has also had an adverse impact on the Company. The data storage industry is also showing signs of recovery, but the outlook for sustained long-term growth in this industry is also uncertain. At July 31, 2004, the Company’s backlog was $46.0 million. The Company remains uncertain about how long revenue growth can be sustained. The Company continues to evaluate its cost structure relative to expected revenue and will continue to implement aggressive cost containment measures where necessary. However, the Company cannot provide assurance that it will be able to implement cost containment measures in a timely or cost effective manner.

22

Table of Contents

Furthermore, the Company’s success is dependent upon supplying technologically superior products to the marketplace at appropriate times to satisfy customer needs. Product development requires substantial investment and is subject to technological risks. Delays or difficulties in product development or market acceptance of newly developed products could adversely affect the future performance of the Company.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk:

At July 31, 2004, the Company’s exposure to market risk relates primarily to changes in interest rates on its investment portfolio. The Company’s cash equivalents consist primarily of fixed income securities. The Company invests only with high credit quality issuers and does not use derivative financial instruments in its investment portfolio. The Company does not believe that a sharp increase or decrease in interest rates would have a material adverse impact on the fair value of its investment portfolio. The Company’s long-term borrowings are at fixed interest rates.

In addition, a portion of the Company’s business is conducted outside the United States through its foreign subsidiaries and an affiliate. The Company generally transacts business in international markets in United States currency, but pays its employees in local currencies. Accordingly, the Company is subject to exposure from adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. Historically, the Company’s exposure to adverse foreign currency fluctuations has been immaterial.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures:

The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Company maintains a system of internal accounting controls that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Company’s transactions are properly recorded, that the Company’s assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use and that the Company’s transactions are properly recorded and reported. As part of the evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company evaluated its internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the first fiscal quarter of 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

23

Table of Contents

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. Exhibits

24

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

25