Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 0-9950

TEAM, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (281) 331-6154

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of August 13, 2004, 8,084,025 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding, of which 5,850,453 were held by non-affiliates. The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sales price of $14.43 per share on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. on such date) was $84,422,037.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III. Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Team, Inc. to be held September 23, 2004.

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

FORM 10-K INDEX

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

(a) General Description of Business

Team, Inc. (“Team” or the “Company”), incorporated in 1973, is a professional full service provider of specialized industrial services including on-stream leak repair, hot tapping, fugitive emissions control monitoring, field machining, technical bolting, field valve repair, field heat treating and non destructive testing/examination (“NDT-NDE”) inspection services. These services are provided throughout the United States in approximately 40 locations. All references to Team or the Company are intended to include its operating subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated.

The Company conducts operations through international locations in Singapore, Aruba, Canada, Trinidad and Singapore. Additionally, the Company licenses its proprietary leak repair and hot tapping techniques and materials to various companies outside the United States and receives a royalty based upon revenues earned by the licensee.

Team’s industrial service offerings have been significantly expanded through two recent acquisitions: 1) in April 2004, the Company acquired Thermal Solutions, Inc. (“Thermal”) a $15 million Denver, Colorado based field heat treating service company, and 2) in August 2004, Team acquired the business assets of Cooperheat-MQS, Inc., (“Cooperheat”) a Houston, Texas based company with two service offerings—field heat treating and NDT inspection services. At the time of the acquisition, Cooperheat was operating under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and is generally believed to have been the number one or number two leading service provider in each of its service lines. Annual revenues for Cooperheat are expected to be approximately $80 million.

Additionally, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Climax Portable Machine Tools, Inc. (“Climax”) of Newberg, Oregon, the Company is engaged in a separate business segment—equipment sales and rental. Climax is a leading designer-manufacturer of portable, metal cutting machine tools used for on-site industrial maintenance. The Climax acquisition provided the support for the Company’s offering of on-site field machining services beginning in February of 1999.

(b) Financial Information about Segments

See Note 12 to accompanying financial statements for financial information about business segments.

(c) Narrative Description of Business

The Company operates in two reportable revenue generating segments—1) industrial services and 2) equipment sales and rental. Industrial services consist principally of leak repair, hot tapping, emissions control monitoring, on-site field machining, technical bolting, valve repair, heat treating and NDT inspection. The equipment sales and rentals segment is comprised of the Climax business. The following table sets forth the revenues (in thousands) from each segment in the three years ended May 31:

Industrial Services

The Company provides industrial services for over 2,000 customers in the petrochemical, refining, power, pipeline, pulp and paper, steel and other industries. Services include leak repair, hot tapping, fugitive emissions monitoring, and, more recently, field machining, technical bolting, field valve repair, field heat treating and NDT inspection.

1

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Leak Repair Services. The Company is the leader in the industry in providing on-stream repairs of leaks in piping systems and related equipment. In conjunction with its leak repair services, the Company markets a line of products, which includes both standard and custom-designed clamps and enclosures for plant systems and pipelines. The Company’s leak repair services consist of on-stream repairs of leaks in pipes, valves, flanges and other parts of piping systems and related equipment primarily in the chemical, refining and utility industries. The Company uses specially developed techniques, sealants and equipment for repairs. Many of the Company’s repairs are furnished as interim measures which allow plant systems to continue operating until more permanent repairs can be made during scheduled plant shutdowns.

The Company’s leak repair services involve inspection of the leak by the Company’s field crew who record pertinent information about the faulty part of the system and transmit the information to the Company’s engineering department for determination of appropriate repair techniques. Repair materials such as clamps and enclosures are custom designed and manufactured at the Company’s facility in Alvin, Texas and delivered to the job site. The Company maintains an inventory of raw materials and semi-finished clamps and enclosures to reduce the time required to manufacture the finished product. Installations of the clamps and enclosures for on-stream repair work are then performed by the field crew using, in large part, materials and sealants that are developed and produced by the Company.

The Company’s manufacturing center has earned the international ISO-9001 certification for its engineering design and manufacturing operations. ISO-9001 is the most stringent of all ISO-9000 certification programs.

The Company’s non-destructive repair methods do not compromise the integrity of its customer’s process system and can be performed in temperatures ranging from cryogenic to 1,700 degrees Fahrenheit and with pressures from vacuum to 6,000 pounds per square inch. The Company’s proprietary sealants are specifically formulated to repair leaks involving over 300 different kinds of chemicals.

Management attributes the success of its leak repair services to the quality and timely performance of its services by its highly skilled technicians, its proprietary techniques and materials and its ability to repair leaks without shutting down the customer’s operating system. On-stream repairs can prevent a customer’s continued loss of energy or process materials through leaks, thereby avoiding costly energy and production losses that accompany equipment shutdowns, and also lessen emissions escaping into the atmosphere.

The Company has continued to develop different types of standard and custom-designed clamps, enclosures and other repair products, which complement the Company’s existing industrial market for leak repair services. The Company’s leak repair services are supported by an in-house Quality Assurance/Quality Control program that monitors the design and manufacture of each product to assure material traceability on critical jobs and to ensure compliance with customers’ requirements.

Hot Tapping Services. The Company’s hot tapping services consist primarily of hot tapping and Line-stop^® services. Hot tapping services involve utilizing special equipment to cut a hole in an on-stream, pressurized pipeline so that a new line can be connected onto the existing line without interrupting operations. Hot tapping is frequently used for making branch connections into piping systems while the production process is operative. Line-stop^® services permit the line to be depressurized downstream so that maintenance work can be performed on the piping system. The Company typically performs these services by mechanically drilling and cutting into the pipeline and installing a device to stop the process flow. The Company also utilizes a line freezing procedure when applicable to stop the process flow using special equipment and techniques.

Emissions Control Services. The Company also provides leak detection services that include fugitive emissions identification, monitoring, data management and reporting services primarily for the chemical, refining and natural gas processing industries. These services are designed to monitor and record emissions from specific process equipment components as requested by the customer, typically to assist the customer in establishing an ongoing maintenance program and/or complying with present and/or future environmental regulations. The Company prepares standard reports in conjunction with EPA requirements or can custom-design these reports to its customers’ specifications.

2

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Field Machining and Technical Bolting Services. This service involves the use of portable machining equipment (manufactured by Climax, as well as third party vendors) to repair or modify in-place machinery, equipment, vessels and piping systems not easily removed from a permanent location. As opposed to the conventional machining process where the work piece rotates and the cutting tool is fixed, in field machining, the work piece remains fixed and the cutting tool rotates. Other common descriptions for this service are on-site or in-place machining. Field machining services include flange facing, pipe cutting, line boring, journal turning, drilling, and milling. Technical bolting services are often provided to our customers as an adjunct to field machining during turnaround or maintenance activities. These services involve the use of hydraulic or pneumatic equipment with bolt tightening techniques to achieve reliable and leak-free connections and also include bolt disassembly using hot bolting or nut splitting techniques.

Field machining and technical bolting services are offered to the Company’s existing customer base through its extensive branch operations. Field machining is an off-stream operation performed during piping isolations, shutdowns, or plant turnarounds.

Inspection Services. Inspection services consist of the testing and evaluation of piping, piping components and equipment to determine the present condition and predict remaining operability. The Company’s inspection services use all the common methods of non-destructive testing, including radiography, ultrasound, magnetic particle and dye penetrate, as well as, higher end robotic and newly developed ultrasonic systems. The Company provides these services as part of planned construction and maintenance programs and on demand as the situation dictates, and provides reports based on interpretation in accordance to industry and national standards. Inspection services are marketed to the same industrial customer base as other Team services and to the pipeline industry. There are a large number of companies offering NDT-NDE inspection services, with no single company having a significant share of the overall market. This service offering has been significantly expanded with the acquisition of the assets of Cooperheat in August 2004. With this acquisition, Team believes it is now the largest NDT-NDE inspection service provider in the United States.

Field Valve Repair Services. In the spring of 2003, the Company launched Field Valve Repair Services as an adjunct to its field machining services. Through this offering, the Company performs on-site repairs to process and control valves, as well as providing preventive maintenance programs and valve data management programs. The targeted customers for these services are generally the same as for our field machining and technical bolting services.

Field Heat Treating Services. In April 2004, the Company commenced field heat treating services through the acquisition of Thermal, a privately-held company based in Denver, Colorado. These services, which include electric resistance and gas-fired combustion, are primarily utilized by industrial users to cure coatings, expand metal parts for assembly or disassembly, remove moisture from components and to provide preheat and post-weld heat treatments to relieve metal stresses. At the time of the acquisition, Thermal was the second largest provider of heat treatment services in the United States. With the acquisition of the business assets of Cooperheat in August 2004, the Company believes it is now clearly the predominant field heat treating service provider in the United States.

Marketing and Customers. Team’s industrial repair services are marketed principally by personnel based at the Company’s approximate 40 locations. Team has developed a cross-marketing program to utilize its sales personnel in offering many of the Company’s services at its operating locations. Management believes that these operating and office locations are situated to facilitate timely response to customer needs, which is an important feature of its services. No customer accounted for 10% or more of consolidated Company revenues during any of the last three fiscal years.

Generally, customers are billed on a time and materials basis although some work may be performed pursuant to a fixed-price bid. Emission control services may also be billed based on the number of components monitored. Services are usually performed pursuant to purchase orders issued under written customer

3

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

agreements. While some purchase orders provide for the performance of a single job, others provide for services to be performed for a term of one year or less. In addition, Team is a party to certain long-term contracts, which are enabling agreements only. Substantially all such agreements may be terminated by either party on short notice. The agreements generally specify the range of services to be performed and the hourly rates for labor. While contracts have traditionally been entered into for specific plants or locations, the Company has recently entered into multiple regional or national contracts, which cover multiple plants or locations.

The Company’s industrial services are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year. The Company typically provides various limited warranties for certain of its repair services. To date, there have been no significant warranty claims filed against the Company.

Business Risks. While the Company’s management is optimistic about Team’s future, maintaining and expanding customer relationships and service volumes are key elements of the Company’s strategy. Weakness in the markets served by the Company could constrain demand. Although the Company has a diversified customer base, a substantial portion of its business is dependent upon the chemical and refining industry sectors. Competitive initiatives and/or poor service performance could also reduce the strength and breadth of current customer relationships and preference for the Company. Although management believes sufficient qualified personnel are available in most areas, no assurance can be made that such personnel will be available when needed.

Competition. Competition in the Company’s industrial services is primarily on the basis of service, quality, timeliness, and price. In general, competition stems from other outside service contractors and customers’ in-house maintenance departments. Management believes Team has a competitive advantage over most service contractors due to the quality, training and experience of its technicians, its nationwide service capability, and due to the broad range of services provided, as well as its technical support and manufacturing capabilities supporting the service network. There are two other service contractors who provide a similar range of service and broad geographical coverage as the Company. Other principal competitors are primarily single-location or single-service companies that compete within a certain geographical area.

Equipment Sales and Rentals

The Equipment Sales and Rentals business is comprised solely of the Climax subsidiary, a leading design-manufacturer of portable machine tools located in Newburg, Oregon. Climax’s standard tools offering consists of boring bars, pipe beveling tools, key mills, portable flange facers, and portable lathes. These tools are sold to end users in the utilities, refining, marine, heavy construction, and extractive industries, or to other service providers and contractors. In addition, Climax designs and manufactures customized machining tools for on-site machine repair, manufacturing, fabrication and construction applications.

Climax’s design and manufacturing operations are conducted in a 30,000 square feet facility in Newberg, Oregon. Climax uses state of the art equipment in its manufacturing process and maintains an inventory of raw materials, parts and completed machines as needed to support the current level of business. Most of the Company’s orders for equipment are filled within 30 days of receipt. The Company believes that there are a limited number of original equipment manufacturers that compete with Climax and that it has a market share of approximately 10%. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of Climax revenues during any of the last three fiscal years.

General

Employees. As of May 31, 2004, the Company and its subsidiaries had approximately 988 employees in its operations. The Company’s employees are not unionized. There have been no employee work stoppages to date, and management believes its relations with its employees are good. The acquisition of Cooperheat in August 2004 has approximately doubled the number of employees of the Company.

4

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Insurance. The Company carries insurance it believes to be appropriate for the businesses in which it is engaged. Under its insurance policies, the Company has per occurrence self-insured retention limits of $50,000 for general liability, and $250,000 for automobile liability and workers’ compensation in most states. The Company has obtained fully insured layers of coverage above such self-retention limits. Since its inception, the Company has not been the subject of any significant liability claims not covered by insurance arising from the furnishing of its services or products to customers. However, because of the nature of the Company’s business, there exists the risk that in the future such liability claims could be asserted which might not be covered by insurance. One such potential claim was asserted in 2004 wherein the Company’s general liability insurance carrier has disputed the existence of coverage and is providing a defense on behalf of the Company subject to a reservation of rights. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings, below.

Regulation. Substantially all of the Company’s business activities are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations. These regulations are administered by various federal, state and local health and safety and environmental agencies and authorities, including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) of the U.S. Department of Labor and the EPA. The Company’s training programs are required to meet certain OSHA standards. Expenditures relating to such regulations are made in the normal course of the Company’s business and are neither material nor place the Company at any competitive disadvantage. The Company does not currently expect to expend material amounts for compliance with such laws during the ensuing two fiscal years.

From time-to-time in the operation of its environmental consulting and engineering services, the assets of which were sold in 1996, the Company handled small quantities of certain hazardous wastes or other substances generated by its customers. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (the “Superfund Act”), the EPA is authorized to take administrative and judicial action to either cause parties who are responsible under the Superfund Act for cleaning up any unauthorized release of hazardous substances to do so, or to clean up such hazardous substances and to seek reimbursement of the costs thereof from the responsible parties, who are jointly and severally liable for such costs under the Superfund Act. The EPA may also bring suit for treble damages from responsible parties who unreasonably refuse to voluntarily participate in such a clean up or funding thereof. Responsible parties include anyone who owns or operates the facility where the release occurred (either currently and/or at the time such hazardous substances were disposed of), or who by contract arranges for disposal, treatment, or transportation for disposal or treatment of a hazardous substance, or who accepts hazardous substances for transport to disposal or treatment facilities selected by such person from which there is a release. Management believes that its risk of liability is minimized since its handling consisted solely of maintaining and storing small samples of materials for laboratory analysis that are classified as hazardous. The Company does not currently carry insurance to cover liabilities which the Company may incur under the Superfund Act or similar environmental statutes due to its prohibitive costs.

Patents. While the Company is the holder of various patents, trademarks, and licenses, the Company does not consider any individual property to be material to its consolidated business operations.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Team and its subsidiaries own real estate and office facilities in the Alvin, Texas area totaling approximately 88,000 square feet of floor space. These facilities are comprised of a corporate office and training building and a manufacturing facility for clamps, enclosures and sealants. The Company also owns real estate and facilities in Newburg, Oregon, which is the manufacturing facility and corporate office of Climax. All of those facilities are pledged as security for the Company’s credit facility. (See Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.) The Company and its subsidiaries also lease 56 office and/or plant and shop facilities at separate locations in 23 states and in Singapore, Aruba, Trinidad and Canada.

The Company believes that its property and equipment, as well as that of its subsidiaries, are adequate for its current needs, although additional investments are expected to be made in additional property and equipment for

5

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

expansion, replacement of assets at the end of their useful lives and in connection with corporate development activities. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding lease obligations on these properties.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In December 2001, the Company and 18 other defendants were sued in a lawsuit styled Lyondell Chemical Company and Atlantic Richfield Company v. Ethyl Corporation et al in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division. In April and May of 2004, the District Court granted motions for summary judgment filed by the Company and dismissed the Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice with respect to claims against Team allegedly arising out of its ownership of the stock of French Limited and of Allstate Vacuum and Tanks, Inc (“Allstate”). The Company has reason to believe that the Plaintiffs will appeal the Court’s ruling in favor of the Company at the end of the case.

This lawsuit arises out of a previous lawsuit filed by the United States of America against the Plaintiffs, Lyondell and Arco Chemical, alleging that hazardous substances and/or pollutants or contaminants were deposited at the Turtle Bayou Site in Liberty County, Texas. Arco and Lyondell entered into a settlement with the United States which was embodied in a Consent Decree. Within three years after the Consent Decree was entered, Arco and Lyondell brought the referenced suit against approximately 18 parties seeking contribution for the costs of response for removal and/or remedial action at the Turtle Bayou Site. The co-defendants include, among others, Exxon-Mobil, El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Company, Du Pont, Ethyl Corporation, and Lubrizol. Later, El Paso added approximately nine additional defendants.

Plaintiffs allege that French Ltd., a vacuum truck company that the Company owned from 1978 to 1984, or its former parent, French Limited of Houston, Inc., had, during the time period of 1969 to 1976, transported hazardous substances to the Turtle Bayou Site.

In 1982, as a result of the contentions made by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the Company informed George Whitten, the one who had sold French, Ltd. to the Company, that his failure to reveal French, Ltd.’s activities with respect to the illegal depositing of hazardous substances was a breach of the representations and warranties of the agreement by which the Company acquired French, Ltd. In November 1984, the Company sold French back to Whitten.

The Plaintiffs alleged that French, Ltd. and, therefore, the Company, should be held liable for French Limited and/or French Limited of Houston, Inc.’s allegedly wrongful deposits of some of the material that was deposited at the Site. Plaintiffs also allege that the Company should be held liable for some alleged disposal of hazardous waste by another former Company subsidiary, Allstate.

In addition to the claims originally put forward by the Plaintiffs, nine of the Defendants have filed cross-claims against the Company in which they contended they do not believe they should be held liable on Plaintiffs’ claims against them, but that if they are held liable then they seek contribution from the Company and other defendants. In addition, four of those same nine defendants which are related to the El Paso Corporation (the “El Paso Defendants”) seek contribution against the Company and others on a related claim by the United States Government on another location within the Turtle Bayou Site at which hazardous wastes were disposed. All defendants except the El Paso Defendants have agreed orally to dismiss their cross-claims against the Company subject to revival if the Plaintiffs appeal the summary judgments granted by the District Court. It appears that the El Paso defendants and the Company are close to an agreement with respect to a motion to dismiss similar to the one proposed with the other defendants; if the Company is not successful in reaching such an agreement, then the Company plans to file a motion for summary judgment requesting that the District Court apply its previously granted summary judgments against the El Paso Defendants.

The Company believes that the claims against it in this matter are without merit, as is supported by the rulings of the District Court.

6

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

In April 2003, Team and three other parties were named as defendants in a lawsuit styled Diamond Shamrock Refining Company, L.P. v. Cecorp, Inc. et al in the 148^th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas. The suit seeks recovery for $40 million in property damages from an explosion and fire originating at a valve which the Company’s personnel were attempting to seal in order to prevent a leak. Liability is being contested and other parties appear to have primary responsibility for the fire and explosion. The Company believes it is insured against this loss with both primary and excess liability insurance, subject to any applicable deductible. However, coverage from the $1 million primary policy is disputed and a defense is being provided by the carrier subject to a reservation of rights.

In June 2004, Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation made demand on Team Industrial Services, Inc. for indemnity from claims asserted against Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation in Linda Alapisco, et al v. Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation, et al, Cause No. L-030085, in the 156^th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas. This suit seeks unspecified damages for the 250 individuals identified in the petition for injuries resulting from alleged exposure to toxic chemicals released as a result of the explosion and fire at the Diamond Shamrock facility. This demand has been turned over to the general liability insurance carrier for a response. As of the date of this report, the carrier has not responded to the claim.

The Company’s umbrella policy has limits of coverage of $25,000,000 and should be more than sufficient to provide the Company a defense and indemnity as to all claims asserted.

The Company and certain subsidiaries are involved in various other lawsuits and are subject to various claims and proceedings encountered in the normal conduct of business. In the opinion of management, any uninsured losses that might arise from these lawsuits and proceedings will not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004.

7

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR TEAM’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

(a) Market Information

Team’s common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. under the symbol “TMI”. The table below reflects the high and low sales prices of the Company’s common stock on the American Stock Exchange by fiscal quarter for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

(b) Holders

There were 282 holders of record of Team’s common stock as of August 13, 2004, excluding beneficial owners of stock held in street name. Although exact information is unavailable, the Company estimates there are approximately 1,750 additional beneficial owners based upon information gathered in connection with proxy solicitation.

(c) Dividends

No dividends were declared or paid in fiscal 2004, 2003 or 2002. Pursuant to the Company’s Credit Agreement, the Company may not pay dividends without the consent of its primary lender. Additionally, future dividend payments will continue to depend on Team’s financial condition, market conditions and other matters deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.

(d) Stock Repurchase Plan

In fiscal 2004, the Company repurchased 50,000 shares of its outstanding common stock on the open market at a weighted average price of $7.89 per share. As of May 31, 2004, the Company is authorized by its Board of Directors and lender to expend up to an additional $1.7 million on open market repurchases.

8

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following is a summary of certain consolidated financial information regarding the Company for the five years ended May 31, 2004 (amounts in thousands, except per share data):

9

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal 2004 Compared to Fiscal 2003

Revenues in 2004 were $107.7 million compared to $91.9 million in 2003, an increase of 17.2%. Operating profits (earnings before interest and taxes, or “EBIT”) were $9.7 million in 2004 versus $7.7 million in 2003, an increase of 25.8%.

The following sets forth the components of revenue and operating profits for fiscal 2004 and 2003:

For the year, the Industrial Services Business Segment revenues increased 16.5% to $94.5 million. Segment operating profit increased 16.2% to $14.0 million. A significant contributor to revenue growth in industrial services in 2004 came from the full year impact of a new service line, field valve repair, which was introduced in the spring of 2003. This service line contributed $4.5 million of the 2004 growth, primarily associated with two major turnaround projects in the summer and fall of 2004. The segment also benefited from new and expanded fugitive emissions monitoring contracts in the West Coast region of the United States and from turnaround activity in the Gulf Coast and the Caribbean. Additionally, the acquisition of Thermal Solutions in April 2004 contributed $2.5 million to industrial services revenue, however, due to the seasonality of field heat treating, it did not contribute to 2004 operating profit for the industrial services segment. The only service line that did not experience revenue growth during the year was NDT inspection, which was down $1.8 million year over year, due to continued softness in pipeline construction activities.

Management believes that demand for the Company’s traditional services is, generally, a function of the population of high-temperature, high-pressure piping systems. Demand is also somewhat related, especially for leak repair and hot tapping, to the operating performance of our customers—particularly in the refining, pipeline, and petrochemical industries. Generally, as those customers’ margins improve, more funds are expended for the specialized industrial services offered by the Company.

The Equipment Sales and Rental Business segment (encompassing Climax Portable Machine Tool Company) grew revenues 22% for the year to $13.1 million—the highest revenue year in the history of Climax. Revenue growth for the year was primarily attributable to the shipment of special tool orders in the third and fourth quarters aggregating over $2 million. Operating profit increased 102% to $1.2 million versus $603 thousand in 2003. Included in operating profit in 2004 is a $235,000 gain from the sale of idle real estate. That is offset by a charge to other expense of $245,000 for estimated losses pertaining to a sales tax matter. A similar charge of $150,000 was recorded in 2003. Climax is domiciled in the state of Oregon, which is a state that imposes no tax on sales originating there. In fiscal 2003, management determined that Climax does have an obligation to collect and remit sales taxes in certain other jurisdictions, which it had not previously done. Climax is nearing completion of a process of entering into agreements with several states with respect to sales tax

10

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

obligations and collecting amounts due from its customers. The cumulative $395,000 charge represents management’s best current estimate of the probable loss that Climax will incur with respect to this matter. The ultimate outcome is subject to a great deal of variables and cannot be determined with a certainty.

With regard to consolidated operating results, overall gross margins were 39.6% of revenues in fiscal 2004 as compared to 40.5% in fiscal 2003. The decline primarily reflects the downturn in NDT Inspection revenues associated with pipeline and pulp & paper customer segments as well as lower profit margins from the Thermal Solutions revenues due to slow seasonal activity in the two months after the acquisition.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased $3.4 million in 2004 versus 2003, an increase of 11.7%. The overall increase in SGA reflects significant increases in incentive compensation, safety training and legal expenses over the prior year. In spite of these elements of cost increase, as a percentage of revenue, SG&A was down—30.3% of revenues in fiscal 2004 versus 31.8% of revenues in fiscal 2003.

Non-cash compensation expense increased by $229,000 in 2004 versus 2003 due to the achievement of a stock-price hurdle of $10.50 per share, which resulted in the vesting of 66,667 options held by the chief executive officer and the recognition of the unamortized compensation expense associated with these options.

Fiscal 2003 Compared to Fiscal 2002

The following sets forth the components of revenue and operating profits for fiscal 2003 and 2002:

For the year, the Industrial Services Business Segment revenues increased 8.9% to $81.1 million. Segment operating profit increased 4.7% to $12.0 million. All major service lines except NDT inspection services experienced growth during the year. NDT inspection revenues were down slightly due to significantly reduced pipeline and pulp & paper projects, which were nearly offset by continued growth in plant inspection services. A significant contributor to the growth in traditional service lines came from new multi-service, multi-location contracts that commenced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002.

Management believes that demand for the Company’s traditional services is, generally, a function of the population of high-temperature, high-pressure piping systems. Demand is also somewhat related, especially for leak repair and hot tapping, to the operating performance of our customers—particularly in the refining, pipeline, and petrochemical industries. Generally, as those customers’ margins improve, more funds are expended for the specialized industrial services offered by the Company.

The Equipment Sales and Rental Business segment (encompassing Climax Portable Machine Tool Company) grew revenues about 2% for the year to $10.8 million. The market for capital equipment continues to

11

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

be depressed in most of the world markets. Revenue growth in Asia offset flat to slightly depressed sales in the U.S. and Europe. Operating profit increased 10% to $603,000 versus $547,000 in 2002. In 2003, Climax provided a $150,000 charge to other expense for estimated losses pertaining to a sales tax matter. Climax is domiciled in the state of Oregon, which is a state that imposes no tax on sales originating there. In fiscal 2003, management determined that Climax had an obligation to collect and remit sales taxes in certain other jurisdictions, which it had not previously done. Climax is in the process of entering into agreements with several states with respect to sales tax obligations and is in the process of collecting amounts due from its customers. The $150,000 charge recorded in 2003 represents management’s best estimate at that time of the probable loss that Climax would incur with respect to this matter.

With regard to consolidated operating results, overall gross margins were 40.5% of revenues in fiscal 2003 as compared to 41.7% in fiscal 2002. The decline primarily reflects the downturn in NDT Inspection revenues associated with pipeline and pulp & paper customer segments as well as lower product margins at Climax due to an increase in lower margin international sales coupled with a strong margin comparison in fiscal 2002 due to a $700 thousand special order in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased $1.8 million in 2003 versus 2002, an increase of 6.5%. The overall increase in SGA reflects a ramp-up of business development personnel in the industrial service segment ahead of related revenue growth and an increasing level of insurance and legal costs in fiscal 2003. In spite of these elements of cost increase, as a percentage of revenue, SG&A was down—31.8% of revenues in fiscal 2003 versus 32.5% of revenues in fiscal 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At May 31, 2004, the Company’s liquid working capital (cash and accounts receivable, less current liabilities) totaled $16.3 million, an increase of $7.4 million since May 31, 2003. The Company utilizes excess operating funds to automatically reduce the amount outstanding under the revolving credit facility. At May 31, 2004, the outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility was $14.0 million and approximately $6.3 million was available to borrow under the facility.

During fiscal 2004, the Company increased its total outstanding debt by $7.5 million as a result of the purchase of Thermal Solutions, Inc. In fiscal 2004, the Company also expended $395,000 to reacquire an additional 50,000 shares of its common stock on the open market pursuant to a stock repurchase plan.

In the opinion of management, the Company currently has sufficient funds and adequate financial sources available to meet its anticipated liquidity needs. Management believes that cash flows from operations, cash balances and available borrowings will be sufficient for the foreseeable future to finance anticipated working capital requirements, capital expenditures and debt service requirements.

At May 31, 2004, the Company had a $34 million bank credit facility that consisted of: (i) a $22,500,000 revolving loan, which matures September 30, 2005, (ii) $9,500,000 in term loans and (iii) a $2,000,000 mortgage loan. Amounts borrowed against the term loans are due in quarterly installments in the amount of $339,000 until the loans mature on September 30, 2005. Amounts borrowed against the mortgage loan are repaid in quarterly installments of $31,000 until its maturity date of September 30, 2008. Amounts outstanding under the credit facility bear interest at a marginal rate over either the LIBOR rate or the prime rate. At May 31, 2004, the Company’s marginal rate was 1.5% over the LIBOR rate. The weighted average rate on outstanding borrowings at May 31, 2004 is approximately 3.1%. The Company also pays a commitment fee of .25% per annum on the average amount of the unused availability under the revolving loan.

Loans under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The terms of the agreement require the maintenance of certain financial ratios and limit investments, liens, leases and indebtedness, and dividends, among other things. At May 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company was in compliance with all credit facility covenants.

12

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

At May 31, 2004, the Company was contingently liable for $2.2 million in outstanding stand-by letters of credit and, at that date, approximately $6.3 million was available to borrow under the credit facility.

On August 11, 2004, in connection with the acquisition of the business asset of Cooperheat-MQS, Inc. (see note 15 to the Consolidated financial statements), the existing credit facility was replaced with a new $75 million facility. The new facility matures in August 2009 and consists of a revolving loan of $50 million and a $25 million term facility. Approximately $55 million (including the entire term loan) was borrowed on August 11, 2004 to finance the Cooperheat-MQS acquisition (approximately $36 million) and to refinance amounts outstanding on the existing Team facilities (approximately $19 million). The term facility requires amortization of $3 million in the first year, $4 million in year two and $6 million in each of years three through five. Amortization begins in November 2004. Interest on the facility is at LIBOR plus a margin which is variable depending upon the ratio of funded debt to EBITDA. Initially, the margin will be 225 basis points above the LIBOR rate. The new facility is secured by virtually all the Company’s assets, including those acquired in the Cooperheat-MQS transaction. The Company paid an underwriters fee of 1.625% of the aggregate amount of the facility.

In the opinion of management, the Company currently has sufficient funds and adequate financial sources available to meet its anticipated liquidity needs. Management believes that cash flows from operations, cash balances and available borrowings will be sufficient for the foreseeable future to finance anticipated working capital requirements, capital expenditures and debt service requirements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Goodwill—The Company has $15.1 million of recorded goodwill associated with business acquisitions made since 1999. Of that amount, approximately $12.2 million is associated with the industrial services segment and $2.9 million is associated with the equipment sales and rental business. Effective June 1, 2002, we have adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which requires that goodwill no longer be amortized but be reviewed for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its annual impairment testing as of May 31 of each year. The Company has evaluated the carrying value of goodwill using a cash-flow multiple calculation methodology and has determined that no adjustment is needed to the carrying value of goodwill during 2003 or 2004.

Revenue Recognition—The Company derives its revenues by providing a variety of industrial services including leak repair, hot tapping, emissions control services, field machining, technical bolting, field valve repair, field heat treating and inspection services. These revenues are based on time and materials and are generally short term in nature. In addition, the Company sells and rents portable machine tools through one of its subsidiaries. For all of these services, revenues are recognized when services are rendered or when product is shipped and risk of ownership passes to the customer.

Deferred Income Taxes—The Company records deferred income tax assets and liabilities related to temporary differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company computes its deferred tax balances by multiplying these temporary differences by the current tax rates. If deferred tax assets exceed deferred tax liabilities, the Company must estimate whether those net deferred asset amounts will be realized in the future. A valuation allowance is then provided for the net deferred asset amounts that are not likely to be realized. As of May 31, 2004 management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will have sufficient future taxable income to allow it to realize the benefits of the net deferred tax assets. Accordingly, no valuation allowance has been recorded.

Loss Contingencies—The Company is involved in various lawsuits and claims encountered in the normal course of business. When such a matter arises and periodically thereafter, management consults with its legal counsel and evaluates the merits of the claim based on the facts available at that time. Currently, the Company is involved with two significant matters, which are summarized in Legal Proceedings above. In management’s opinion, an adequate accrual has been made as of May 31, 2004 to provide for any losses that may arise from these contingencies.

13

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

Other Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The Company enters into capital leases related to certain computer and equipment and software, as well as operating leases related to facilities and transportation and other equipment. These operating leases are over terms ranging from one to five years with typical renewal options and escalation clauses.

The Company is occasionally required to post letters of credit generally issued by a bank as collateral under certain agreements. A letter of credit commits the issuer to remit specified amounts to the holder, if the holder demonstrates that the Company has failed to meet its obligations under the letter of credit. If this were to occur, the Company would be obligated to reimburse the issuer for any payments the issuer was required to remit to the holder of the letter of credit. To date, the Company has not had any claims made against a letter of credit that resulted in a payment made be the issuer or the Company to the holder. The Company believes that it is unlikely that it will have to fund claims made under letters of credit in the foreseeable future.

At May 31, 2004, the Company’s contractual obligations are summarized as follows:

New Accounting Standards

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” The statement applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets, except for certain obligations of lessees. SFAS 143 became effective for the Company in June 2003 and has not impacted the Company’s financial statements.

The company has reviewed other new accounting standards not identified above and does not believe any other new standards will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results.

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Any forward-looking information contained herein is being provided in accordance with the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Such information is subject to certain assumptions and beliefs based on current information known to the Company and is subject to factors that could result in actual results differing materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements contained herein. Such factors include domestic and international economic activity, interest rates, market conditions for the Company’s customers, regulatory changes and legal proceedings, and the Company’s successful implementation of its internal operating plans. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any forward-looking statements contained herein will occur or that objectives will be achieved.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company has a credit facility, which subjects the Company to the risk of loss associated with movements in market interest rates. At May 31, 2004, the Company has floating-rate obligations totaling $18.6 million outstanding under its credit facility (see Note 6 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements). A 1% increase in interest rates could result in an annual increase in interest expense of $186,000.

14

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders of Team, Inc.

Alvin, Texas

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Team, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Team, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” as of June 1, 2002.

KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas

July 14, 2004, except as to note 15,

which is as of August 11, 2004

15

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

16

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

17

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

18

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

19

Table of Contents

Index to Financial Statements

TEAM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS