UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File number: 333-41780
ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Delaware | 36-4368292 | |
(State of Organization) | (IRS Employer Identification Number) | |
c/o Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. General Partner 141 West Jackson Boulevard Suite 1340A Chicago, Illinois |
60604 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(312) 264-4375
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Total number of Pages: 19 plus exhibits
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements of Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. are included in Item 1:
Page | ||
Financial Statements | ||
Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2004 (unaudited) and December 31, 2003 |
3 | |
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 | ||
7 | ||
8 | ||
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) | 9-11 |
2
Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Statements of Financial Condition as of June 30, 2004 (unaudited) and December 31, 2003
6/30/2004 |
12/31/2003 | |||||
ASSETS |
||||||
Cash at bank |
$ | 922,936 | $ | 2,711,877 | ||
Cash at broker |
2,500,028 | 609,790 | ||||
Investment in US Government obligations |
18,184,609 | 10,261,500 | ||||
Unrealized net trading gains on open futures contracts |
| 620,470 | ||||
Interest receivable |
289,958 | 35,710 | ||||
Total Assets |
$ | 21,897,531 | $ | 14,239,347 | ||
LIABILITIES |
||||||
Unrealized net trading losses on open futures contracts |
$ | 1,422,561 | ||||
Commissions payable |
5,825 | $ | 3,794 | |||
Accrued management fees |
28,908 | 20,592 | ||||
Administrative fees payable |
137,406 | 189,446 | ||||
Redemptions payable |
33,797 | 2,742,486 | ||||
Subscriptions received in advance |
491,701 | 2,768,023 | ||||
Total Liabilities |
2,120,198 | 5,724,341 | ||||
PARTNERS CAPITAL |
||||||
Partners Capital |
19,777,333 | 8,515,006 | ||||
Total Liabilities and Partners Capital |
$ | 21,897,531 | $ | 14,239,347 | ||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
3
Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Schedule of Investments as of June 30, 2004 (unaudited)
Market Value |
Percent of Partners Capital |
|||||
US Government obligations: (total cost - $18,268,764) |
||||||
US Treasury Notes, due 8/15/05, at 3%, principal amount $7,000,000 |
$ | 7,051,406 | 35.65 | % | ||
US Federal Home Loan Bank Notes, due 1/14/05 at 4.125%, principal amount $11,000,000 |
11,133,203 | 56.29 | % | |||
$ | 18,184,609 | 91.94 | % | |||
Open Futures Contracts:
Number of Contracts |
Market Value |
Percent of Partners Capital |
|||||||
Unrealized gains (96.05% US based) |
|||||||||
Agricultural |
73 | $ | 53,618 | 0.27 | % | ||||
Metals |
51 | 166,740 | 0.84 | % | |||||
124 | $ | 220,358 | 1.11 | % | |||||
Unrealized losses (96.51% US based) |
|||||||||
Agricultural |
407 | $ | 686,640 | 3.47 | % | ||||
Energies |
220 | 774,567 | 3.92 | % | |||||
Metals |
90 | 181,712 | 0.92 | % | |||||
717 | $ | 1,642,919 | 8.31 | % | |||||
Unrealized net trading losses on open futures contracts |
$ | (1,422,561 | ) | -7.20 | % | ||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
4
Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2003
Market Value |
Percent of Partners Capital |
|||||
US Government obligations: (total cost - $10,253,632) |
||||||
US Treasury Notes, due 2/28/05, at 1.625%, principal amount $4,200,000 |
$ | 4,218,375 | 49.54 | % | ||
US Federal Home Loan Bank Notes, due 12/15/04 at 2.125%, principal amount $6,000,000 |
6,043,125 | 70.97 | % | |||
$ | 10,261,500 | 120.51 | % | |||
Open Futures Contracts:
Number of Contracts |
Market Value |
Percent of Partners Capital |
||||||
Unrealized gains (97.75% US based) |
||||||||
Energy |
151 | $ | 430,207 | 5.05 | % | |||
Metals |
83 | 241,274 | 2.83 | % | ||||
Agricultural |
90 | 68,313 | 0.80 | % | ||||
324 | $ | 739,794 | 8.68 | % | ||||
Unrealized losses (93% US based) |
||||||||
Agricultural |
182 | $ | 118,324 | 1.39 | % | |||
Metals |
1 | 1,000 | 0.01 | % | ||||
183 | $ | 119,324 | 1.40 | % | ||||
Unrealized net trading gains on open futures contracts |
$ | 620,470 | 7.28 | % | ||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
5
Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Statements of Operations for theThree Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 (unaudited)
3 months ended |
3 months ended |
6 months ended |
6 months ended |
|||||||||||||
Trading gains (losses): |
||||||||||||||||
Realized net trading gains (losses) commodities |
$ | 1,574,690 | $ | (384,058 | ) | $ | 3,234,385 | $ | 843,180 | |||||||
Realized gains (losses) on securities |
(72,156 | ) | | (65,938 | ) | 49,935 | ||||||||||
Change in unrealized net trading gains (losses) commodities |
(2,052,390 | ) | 638,646 | (2,043,251 | ) | (240,108 | ) | |||||||||
Change in unrealized losses on securities |
(96,689 | ) | (25,312 | ) | (92,170 | ) | (92,261 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |
(6,266 | ) | 5,779 | (3,439 | ) | 12,102 | ||||||||||
Commissions |
(30,004 | ) | (13,290 | ) | (48,244 | ) | (24,899 | ) | ||||||||
Net gains (losses) from trading activities |
(682,815 | ) | 221,765 | 981,343 | 547,949 | |||||||||||
Investment income: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income US Government obligations |
122,081 | 48,481 | 179,039 | 95,256 | ||||||||||||
Interest income Other |
7,471 | 934 | 11,908 | 3,798 | ||||||||||||
129,552 | 49,415 | 190,947 | 99,054 | |||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Management fees |
115,000 | 36,553 | 170,762 | 76,611 | ||||||||||||
Administrative fees |
120,631 | 23,986 | 165,627 | 51,002 | ||||||||||||
235,631 | 60,539 | 336,389 | 127,613 | |||||||||||||
Net investment loss |
(106,079 | ) | (11,124 | ) | (145,442 | ) | (28,559 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (788,894 | ) | $ | 210,641 | $ | 835,901 | $ | 519,390 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
6
Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Statements of Changes in Partners Capital for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 (unaudited)
6 months ended 6/30/04 |
6 months ended 6/30/03 |
|||||||
Partners Capital at beginning of year |
$ | 8,515,006 | $ | 7,278,256 | ||||
Contributions |
12,064,339 | | ||||||
Net income |
835,901 | 519,390 | ||||||
Withdrawals |
(1,637,913 | ) | (1,173,572 | ) | ||||
Partners Capital at end of period |
$ | 19,777,333 | $ | 6,624,074 | ||||
Per unit data |
6/30/04 |
6/30/03 | ||||
Net asset value |
$ | 154.79 | $ | 122.69 | ||
Units outstanding |
127,770 | 53,991 | ||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
7
Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Financial Highlights for the Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 (unaudited)
3 months ended |
3 months ended |
6 months ended |
6 months ended |
|||||||||
Ratio of Net Investment Loss to Average Net Assets |
(0.57 | )% | (0.17 | )% | (0.95 | )% | (0.42 | )% | ||||
Ratio of Expenses to Average Net Assets |
1.27 | % | 0.92 | % | 2.20 | % | 1.87 | % | ||||
Total Return |
(3.88 | )% | 3.27 | % | 8.72 | % | 7.10 | % |
The above ratios have not been annualized and were calculated for the limited partner class taken as a whole. The computation of such ratios was not based on the amount of expenses assessed and income allocated to an individual partners capital account, which may vary from these ratios based on the timing of capital transactions and the different fee arrangements (see Note 2).
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
8
Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)
Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies:
Nature of Business and Organization: Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P. (the Partnership) is an Illinois Limited Partnership that was established in May 2000. The Partnership trades a portfolio of commodity futures and forward contracts, principally on recognized exchanges. The Partnership may also purchase forward contracts in the OTC marketplace under certain circumstances. The Partnership invests and trades exclusively on the long side of the market. The Partnerships investment strategy is designed to replicate the Rogers International Commodity Index (the Index) and positions are rebalanced monthly to maintain the Index. The Partnership commenced trading during November 2001. The Partnership will terminate on December 31, 2020 or earlier upon certain circumstances as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement. The Partnerships General Partner and commodity pool operator is Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. (the General Partner).
Basis of presentation: The financial statements included herein were prepared by us without audit according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The financial statements reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations as of and for the periods indicated. The results of operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or for any other period.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Net Assets: The valuation of net assets includes open commodity futures and forward contracts owned by the Partnership, if any, at the end of the period. The unrealized gain or loss on these contracts has been calculated based on closing prices on the last business day of each month. Foreign currency is translated into US dollars at the exchange rate prevailing on the last business day of each month. Net asset value is determined by subtracting liabilities from assets, which also equals Partners capital.
Profit and Loss Allocation: All Partners share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in the proportion that each partners capital account bears to the total partners capital.
Income Taxes: No provision for Federal income taxes has been made since the Partnership is not subject to taxes on income. Each partner is individually liable for the tax on its share of income or loss.
Revenue Recognition: Commodity futures contracts are recorded on the trade date, and open positions are reflected in the accompanying statements of financial condition as the difference between the original contract value and the market value on the last business day of the reporting period. The market value of the commodity futures is based upon the most recent available settlement price on the appropriate commodity exchanges. US Treasury securities and other US Government obligations are reported at market. Changes in unrealized gains or (losses) represent the total increases (decreases) in unrealized gains or (increases) decreases in unrealized losses on open positions during the period.
Interest Income Recognition: The Partnership records interest income in the period it is earned.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
9
Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)
Note 2. Agreements and Related Party Transactions:
The Limited Partnership Agreement vests all responsibility and powers for the management of the business and affairs of the Partnership with the General Partner, Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. The General Partner is responsible for the trading decisions of the Partnership.
The Partnership pays a monthly management fee to the General Partner equal to 0.1458% of the average monthly sum of all Capital Accounts contributed by Limited Partners at the close of each month (1.75% per annum), as of May 1, 2004. Prior to May 1, 2004 the monthly management fee was 0.1875% of the sum of all Capital Accounts contributed by Limited Partners at the close of each month (2.25% per annum).
The Partnership is responsible for the administrative and trading expenses related to its operations. The General Partner may incur certain expenses on behalf of the Partnership and charge the Partnership for its allocable portion of these expenses.
Hart Capital Management, Inc. (Hart) is the investment manager for the Partnership. Hart is a division of Arbor Research & Trading, Inc. (Arbor), which is a member of the General Partner. Three members of the General Partner are also principals of Arbor. Hart provides certain investment management, advisory and research services with respect to the investing and trading activities of the Partnership. Hart is paid an annual advisory fee of 0.1% of the average month-end market value of the Portfolio under management, as of May 1, 2004. Prior to May 1, 2004 the advisory fee paid to Hart was 0.5% of the average month-end market value of the Portfolio under management.
Uhlmann Price Securities L.L.C., one of several broker-dealers selling units of the Partnership and a related party to the General Partner, receives a share of selling fees when units are sold by its registered brokers. In addition, Uhlmann Price Securities L.L.C. receives 1.0% of all contributions. The selling fees and commissions are charged to partners capital upon the issuance of Partnership units.
In addition, there is an annual trailing servicing fee of up to 1% of the net asset value of the specific partners capital account payable to Beeland Management, most of which will be paid to soliciting broker-dealers for ongoing investor services.
The Price Futures Group, Inc., a related party to the General Partner, acts as the introducing broker for the Partnership, whereby certain accounts of the Partnership are introduced to the Partnerships clearing broker. The clearing broker pays Price Futures Group a portion of the brokerage fee paid by the Partnership for clearing transactions.
A summary of fees charges by related parties to the Partnership is as follows:
3 months ended 6/30/2004 |
3 months ended 6/30/2003 |
6 months ended 6/30/2004 |
6 months ended 6/30/2003 | |||||||||
Management fees - General Partner |
$ | 115,000 | $ | 36,553 | $ | 170,762 | $ | 76,611 | ||||
Advisory fees - Hart |
10,452 | 7,611 | 26,933 | 15,252 | ||||||||
1% of contributions - Uhlmann Price Securities, L.L.C. |
54,035 | 0 | 127,041 | 0 |
10
Rogers International Raw Materials Fund, L.P.
Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)
Note 3. Partnership Capital and Redemptions:
The Partnership accepts contributions as of the close of business on the last business day of each month for investment on the first day of the next succeeding month. The General Partner may accept or reject contributions and waive the minimum contribution amounts in its sole discretion.
The purchase price of a unit is the net asset value per unit as of the end of each calendar month. Net asset value per unit is calculated as the net asset value at month end divided by the number of outstanding units.
Limited Partners may withdraw capital, with no less than 60 days prior written notice to the General Partner, after a three-month initial holding period.
Note 4. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Credit and Market Risk:
In connection with its trading activities, the Partnership enters into transactions in a variety of securities and derivative financial instruments, primarily exchange-traded futures contracts. These derivative financial instruments may have market and/or credit risk in excess of the amounts recorded in the statements of financial condition.
Market Risk-Market risks arise from changes in the market value of financial instruments. Theoretically, the Partnerships exposure is equal to the notional contract value of futures contracts purchased. Exposure to market risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the relationships between financial instruments, and the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the financial instruments are traded. In many cases, the use of financial instruments serves to modify or offset market risk associated with other transactions and, accordingly, serves to decrease the Partnerships overall exposure to market risks. The Partnership attempts to control its exposure to market risk through various analytical monitoring techniques.
Credit Risk-Credit risk arises primarily from the potential inability of counterparties to perform in accordance with the terms of a contract. The Partnerships exposure to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance is limited to the current cost to replace all futures contracts in which the Partnership has a gain. Exchange-traded financial instruments generally do not give rise to significant counterparty exposure due to the cash settlement procedures for daily market movements and the margin requirements of individual exchanges.
Concentration of Credit Risk-The Partnership clears all of its trades through one clearing broker. In the event this counterparty does not fulfill its obligations, the Partnership may be exposed to risk. This risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparties to these transactions.
The Partnership has a substantial portion of its assets on deposit with financial institutions in connection with its cash management activities. In the event of a financial institutions insolvency, recovery of the Partnerships assets on deposit may be limited to the amount of insurance or other protection afforded such deposits.
The Partnership attempts to minimize this credit risk by monitoring the creditworthiness of the clearing broker and financial institutions.
11
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
INTRODUCTION
The Partnerships principle objective is to provide an alternative investment vehicle for investors with diversified investment portfolios. The Partnerships trading will be designed to replicate the positions which comprise the Rogers International Commodity Index. The Partnership invests and trades in a portfolio of commodity futures and forward contracts. The Partnership invests and trades solely on the long side of the market. Beeland Management, as general partner, manages all business of the Partnership.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Partnership will raise additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to the continuing offering and does not intend to raise any capital through borrowing. Due to the nature of the Partnerships business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.
LIQUIDITY
Most United States commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as daily price fluctuation limits or daily limits. During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. This may affect the Partnerships ability to initiate new positions or close existing ones or may prevent it from having orders executed. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Partnership from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Partnership to substantial losses, which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Partnership may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices if little trading in such contracts is taking place.
Trading in forward contracts introduces a possible further impact on liquidity. Because such contracts are executed off exchange between private parties, the time required to offset or unwind these positions may be greater than that for regulated instruments. This potential delay could be exacerbated to the extent a counterparty is not a United States person.
Other than these limitations on liquidity, which are inherent in the Partnerships futures trading operations, the Partnerships assets are expected to be highly liquid.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
Net Gains from Trading Activities and Investment Income |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Realized net gains (losses) |
$ | 1,502,534 | $ | (384,058 | ) | $ | 3,168,447 | $ | 893,115 | |||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) |
(2,149,079 | ) | 613,334 | (2,135,421 | ) | (332,369 | ) | |||||||||
Foreign exchange gains (losses) |
(6,266 | ) | 5,779 | (3,439 | ) | 12,102 | ||||||||||
Commissions |
(30,004 | ) | (13,290 | ) | (48,244 | ) | (24,899 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
129,552 | 49,415 | 190,947 | 99,054 | ||||||||||||
Total Net Gains (Losses) from Trading Activities and Investment Income | $ | (553,263 | ) | $ | 271,180 | $ | 1,172,290 | $ | 647,003 | |||||||
12
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
Expenses |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | ||||||||
Management fees |
$ | 115,000 | $ | 36,553 | $ | 170,762 | $ | 76,611 | ||||
Administrative fees |
120,631 | 23,986 | 165,627 | 51,002 | ||||||||
Total Expenses |
$ | 235,631 | $ | 60,539 | $ | 336,389 | $ | 127,613 | ||||
The Partnership pays various fees and expenses on a continuing basis which include management fees, subscription fees, advisory fees, and brokerage commission and transaction fees.
Cash flows used in operating activities were used primarily to purchase U.S. Government obligations. The remaining cash was provided by realized trading gains and interest and was used for operating expenses net of any payables and receivables.
Cash flows provided by financing activities were from the sale of Partnership units, net of any subscription fees paid and any subscriptions receivable, and reduced by redemptions of Partnership units.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
The term off-balance sheet risk refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Partnership intends to trade in futures and forward contracts and may therefore become a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts, there exists a market risk that such contracts may be significantly influenced by conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Partnership at the same time, the Partnership could experience substantial losses.
In addition to market risk, in entering into futures and forward contracts there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Partnership. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the United States and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES VALUATION OF THE PARTNERSHIPS POSITIONS
Beeland Management believes that the accounting policies that are most critical to the Partnerships financial condition and results of operations relate to the valuation of the Partnerships positions. The majority of the Partnerships positions are exchange-traded futures contracts, which are valued daily at settlement prices published by the exchanges. Any spot or forward foreign currency contracts held by the Partnership are also valued at published daily settlement prices or at dealers quotes. Thus, Beeland Management expects that under normal circumstances substantially all of the Partnerships assets will be valued on a daily basis using objective measures.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTRODUCTION
The Partnership is a speculative index fund designed to replicate the composition of a commodity index. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative purposes, and all or a substantial amount of the Partnerships assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnerships main line of business.
13
Market movements can produce frequent changes in the fair market value of the Partnerships open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Partnerships market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of exchange rates, interest rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnerships open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.
Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnerships speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnerships experience to date (i.e., risk of ruin). In light of this, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification included in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnerships losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnerships attempts to manage its market risk.
Standard of Materiality
Materiality as used in this section, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, and multiplier features of the Partnerships market sensitive instruments.
QUANTIFYING THE PARTNERSHIPS TRADING VALUE AT RISK
Quantitative Forward-Looking Statements
The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnerships market risk exposures contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact (such as the dollar amount of maintenance margin required for market risk sensitive instruments held at the end of the reporting period).
The Partnerships risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the Partnership is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk. The Partnership uses the absolute value of unrealized profit or loss as the measure of its Value at Risk.
THE PARTNERSHIPS TRADING VALUE AT RISK IN DIFFERENT MARKET SECTORS
The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnerships open positions by market category as of June 30, 2004.
Market Sector |
Value at Risk |
Percent of Net Assets |
||||
Agricultural |
$ | 740,258 | 3.74 | % | ||
Metals |
$ | 348,452 | 1.76 | % | ||
Energy |
$ | 774,567 | 3.92 | % | ||
TOTAL: |
$ | 1,863,277 | 9.42 | % |
MATERIAL LIMITATIONS ON VALUE AT RISK AS AN ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK
The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership may typically be many times the applicable maintenance margin requirement (maintenance margin requirements generally ranging between approximately 1% and 10% of contract face value) as well as potentially many times the capitalization of the Partnership. The magnitude of the Partnerships open positions could create a risk of ruin not typically found in most other investment vehicles.
14
Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions unusual, but historically recurring from time to time could cause the Partnership to incur severe losses over a short period of time. The Value at Risk tables as well as the past performance of the Partnership give no indication of this risk of ruin.
NON-TRADING RISK
The Partnership may experience non-trading market risk on any foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as the market risk they represent) are expected to be immaterial. The Partnership also may have non-trading market risk as a result of investing in U.S. Government obligations. The market risk represented by these investments is expected to be immaterial.
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING PRIMARY TRADING RISK EXPOSURES
The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnerships market risk exposures except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the Partnership manages its primary market risk exposures constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Partnerships primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by Beeland Management for managing such exposures, are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnerships risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Partnership. There can be no assurance that the Partnerships current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.
The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Partnership as of June 30, 2004 by market sector.
Agricultural. The Partnerships primary commodities exposure is to agricultural pricing movements in wheat, corn, soybeans, cotton, and coffee. Each of these are often directly affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions or by the level of import and export activity between countries.
Metals. The Partnerships primary metal market exposure is to fluctuations in the price of aluminum, copper, gold, silver and zinc. Each of these metals is subject to substantial pricing fluctuations based on international supply and demand.
Energy. The Partnerships primary energy market exposure is to crude oil pricing movements, often resulting from political developments in the Middle East. Oil prices can be volatile and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be experienced in this market.
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING NON-TRADING RISK EXPOSURE
General
The Partnership is unaware of any (i) anticipated known demands, commitments or capital expenditures; (ii) material trends, favorable or unfavorable, in its capital resources; or (iii) trends or uncertainties that will have a material effect on operations. From time to time, certain regulatory agencies have proposed increased margin requirements on futures contracts. Because the Partnership generally will use a small percentage of assets as margin, the Partnership does not believe that any increase in margin requirements, as proposed, will have a material effect on the Partnerships operations.
15
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES REGARDING MEANS OF MANAGING RISK EXPOSURE
Since the Partnership is designed to replicate the composition of a commodity index, Beeland Management adjusts the Partnerships portfolio only as necessary to accommodate expirations in particular commodity futures contracts and to adjust overall position size for changes resulting from subscriptions and redemptions to the Partnership. Beeland Management might also initiate an adjustment to reflect a change in the commodity index itself. Except as may be involved in these situations, Beeland Management has no discretion over the positions the Partnership maintains. Consequently, Beeland Management does not apply risk management techniques in its trading decisions as such decisions depend largely on factors such as contract expiration and the level of investor participation in the Partnership which are exogenous to market prices. The Partnership initiates positions only on the long side of the market and does not employ stop-loss techniques.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Beeland Management have concluded that the Partnership has effective disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Partnership is made known to them by others within the Partnership, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared. The principal executive officer and financial and principal accounting officer of Beeland Management have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this report (the Evaluation Date) and have based the foregoing conclusion about the effectiveness of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.
During the period covered by this report, there have been no significant changes in the Partnerships internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.
16
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
None
Item 2. Changes in Securities
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submissions of Matters to a vote of Security Holders.
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
None
17
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on August 16, 2004.
ROGERS INTERNATIONAL RAW MATERIALS FUND, L.P. | ||
(Registrant) | ||
By: |
Beeland Management Company, L.L.C. | |
General Partner | ||
By: |
/s/ Walter Thomas Price III | |
Walter Thomas Price III | ||
Managing Member |
18
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number |
Description of Document |
Page Number | ||
31.01 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | E-2 | ||
32.01 | Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | E-3 | ||
31.02 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | E-4 | ||
32.02 | Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | E-5 |
E-1