Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File No. 333-115486

El Pollo Loco, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

3333 Michelson Drive, Suite 550

Irvine, California 92612

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(949) 399-2000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No x

As of August 16, 2004, the registrant had 100 shares of its common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained within this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are those that do not relate solely to historical fact. They include, but are not limited to, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance, achievements or events. They may contain words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend,” “project,” “plan,” “will,” “should,” “may,” “could” or words or phrases of similar meaning.

These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Also, these forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Except for our ongoing obligation to disclose material information as required by federal securities laws, we do not intend to update you concerning any future revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include our substantial level of indebtedness, food-borne-illness incidents, increases in the cost of chicken, our dependence upon frequent deliveries of food and other supplies, our vulnerability to changes in consumer preferences and economic conditions, our sensitivity to events and conditions in the greater Los Angeles area, our ability to compete successfully with other quick service and fast casual restaurants, our ability to expand into new markets, our reliance in part on our franchisees, our ability to support our expanding franchise system and litigation we face in connection with our operations. Actual results may differ materially due to these risks and uncertainties and those described in our Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-115486) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2004.

3

Table of Contents

PART I

EL POLLO LOCO, INC.

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of EPL, Intermediate, Inc.)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED) (In thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO, INC.

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of EPL, Intermediate, Inc.)

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED) (In thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO, INC.

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of EPL, Intermediate, Inc.)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO, INC.

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of EPL, Intermediate, Inc.)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

(Continued)

7

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO, INC.

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of EPL, Intermediate, Inc.)

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(In thousands)

(Concluded)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

8

Table of Contents

EL POLLO LOCO, INC.

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of EPL Intermediate, Inc.)

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying condensed financial statements are unaudited. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (the “Company”) prepared these condensed financial statements in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s instructions for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. In compliance with those instructions, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted.

The accompanying financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of its financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

The accompanying condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-115486) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2004.

The Company uses a 52-, 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Wednesday of the calendar year. In a 52-week fiscal year, each quarter includes 13 weeks of operations; in a 53-week fiscal year, the first, second and third quarters each include 13 weeks of operations and the fourth quarter includes 14 weeks of operations. Fiscal year 2003, which ended December 31, 2003, was a 53-week fiscal year. Fiscal year 2004, which will end December 29, is a 52-week fiscal year. For simplicity of presentation, the Company has described the 13 week and 26 week periods ended June 25, 2003 as June 30, 2003. The Wednesday nearest to June 30, 2004 coincided with June 30, 2004.

The Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (“EPLI”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of EPL Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”).

In April 2004, the Company acquired the assets of two previously franchised restaurants (Cathedral City restaurants). The purchase price of $2.4 million consisted of cash and was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations. The Company’s preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of the acquired assets is as follows: property, $1.3 million, and goodwill and other intangibles, $1.1 million. Results of operations of the Cathedral City restaurants are included in the Company’s financial statements beginning April 2004.

9

Table of Contents

The Company uses the intrinsic value method to account for employee stock options in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Under APB Opinion No. 25, the Company does not recognize compensation expense related to employee stock options if the exercise price of the options is equal to or greater than the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant.

SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, encourages, but does not require, the recognition of compensation expense for employee stock-based compensation arrangements using the minimum value method of accounting. The Company has elected the “disclosure only” alternative permitted by SFAS No. 123 and has disclosed pro forma net income amounts using the minimum value method.

Had compensation expense for the stock options in Holdings issued to and held by the Company’s employees and one member of its board of directors been recognized based on the minimum value on the grant date under the methodology prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income for the periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004 would have been impacted as shown in the following table (in thousands):

10

Table of Contents

The minimum value of each option grant is estimated on the grant date using the following assumptions for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003 and 2004: risk-free interest rate of 2.84% and 4.35%, respectively; expected volatility of 0% for each period; an expected option life of 7.7 and 7.3 years, respectively, for each period; and no expected dividends for each period.

On December 19, 2003, the Company issued $110.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior secured notes due 2009 (“Senior Secured Notes”) in a private offering. Interest accrues at 9.25% per annum and is payable semi-annually in June and December. Principal is due December 18, 2009. The Company commenced an offer on August 12, 2004 to exchange the Senior Secured Notes for registered, publicly tradable notes that have substantially identical terms as the Senior Secured Notes. The Senior Secured Notes are secured by a second-priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s and EPLI’s assets and a pledge from EPLI of all its outstanding stock of the Company. The Company may, at its option, redeem some or all of the Senior Secured Notes prior to their maturity.

The Company incurred approximately $5.7 million of direct costs in connection with this offering. These costs have been capitalized and are included in other intangible assets as deferred financing costs in the accompanying condensed balance sheets. Concurrent with the closing of the Senior Secured Notes, the Company amended its previously existing bank credit facility as described in Note 5.

11

Table of Contents

The Company used $39.5 million of the proceeds from the Senior Secured Notes offering to reduce its previously existing bank notes payable and used $70.0 million of the proceeds to pay a dividend to EPLI. EPLI applied the proceeds from the dividend to repurchase all of the outstanding shares of its preferred stock in an aggregate amount of $20.1 million and to make a distribution to Holdings in the amount of $49.9 million, which Holdings subsequently distributed to its shareholders. In connection with that distribution, Holdings reduced the exercise price of outstanding common stock options in Holdings previously issued to Company management and one member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Option Holders”). In addition, the Company accrued in December 2003 and paid the Option Holders in January 2004 $1.9 million in bonuses. The Company will make additional cash bonus payments to the Option Holders related to the revaluation of the stock options at various times through 2009 subject to their continued employment and other conditions; these payments are estimated to aggregate approximately $1.1 million. The combined effect of the reduction in the exercise price of the options and the cash bonus payments is to restore the approximate economic position of the Option Holders to that existing immediately before the dividend to the shareholders of Holdings.

In connection with the Senior Secured Notes offering discussed in Note 4, the Company’s Credit Facility with SunTrust Bank was amended on December 19, 2003. The amended Credit Facility consists of a $15.0 million revolving loan (the “Revolver”) and an $11.0 million term loan (the “Term Loan” and together with the Revolver, the “Amended Credit Facility”). The Revolver has a $10.0 million sub-limit for letters of credit and a $5.0 million sub-facility. The Revolver and Term Loan mature on December 31, 2006. Availability of credit under the Revolver is governed by a borrowing base, determined as a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined in the agreement. The Amended Credit Facility is secured by a first-priority pledge by Holdings of all of the outstanding stock of EPLI, a first priority pledge by EPLI of all of the Company’s outstanding stock and a first priority security interest in substantially all the Company’s tangible and intangible assets. In addition, the Amended Credit Facility is guaranteed by EPLI and Holdings.

At December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, the Company had $11.0 million and $9.2 million, respectively, outstanding under the Term Loan. At December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, the Company did not have any borrowings outstanding under the Revolver, but did have $4.6 million and $5.7 million in outstanding letters of credit at December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, respectively. As of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004, the Company had $10.4 million and $9.3 million available for borrowing under the revolver, respectively.

In March of 2004, EPLI sold $70.0 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 12½% Senior Discount Notes due 2010 (the “Intermediate Notes”). The Intermediate Notes are unsecured. EPLI realized gross proceeds of $39.0 million from the sale of the Intermediate Notes. After offering expenses of approximately $2.0 million, the net proceeds of approximately $37.0 million were used to make a cash distribution to Holdings, which applied the proceeds to pay a cash dividend to its stockholders. In connection with this transaction, the Company incurred approximately $1.3 million in expenses in April 2004 related to the revaluation of options it previously issued to

12

Table of Contents

Company management and one member of its Board of Directors to purchase shares of common stock of Holdings. The Company will make additional cash bonus payments to the Option Holders related to the revaluation of the stock options at various times through 2009 subject to their continued employment and other conditions; these payments are estimated to aggregate approximately $1.0 million. The combined effect of the reduction in the exercise price of the options and the cash bonus payments is to restore the approximate economic position of the Option Holders to that existing immediately before the dividend to the shareholders of Holdings.

Although the Company is not obligated to pay any of EPLI’s obligations related to the Intermediate Notes, EPLI is a holding company whose only material asset is the Company’s outstanding common stock. Therefore, the principal source of the cash required to pay the obligations of EPLI is the cash that the Company generates from its operations. No cash interest will accrue on the Intermediate Notes prior to March 15, 2009. Instead, the principal value of the Intermediate Notes will increase (representing accretion of original issue discount) from the date of original issuance until but not including March 15, 2009 at a rate of 12½% per annum compounded annually, so that the accreted value of the Intermediate Notes on March 15, 2009 will be equal to the full principal amount at maturity. Beginning on March 15, 2009, cash interest will accrue on the Intermediate Notes at an annual rate of 12½% per annum payable in arrears on March 15, 2010. Principal is also due March 15, 2010.

There are various claims and pending legal actions against or indirectly involving the Company, including claims asserted by employees and other matters. It is the opinion of management, after considering a number of factors, including but not limited to the current status of litigation (including any settlement discussions), the views of retained counsel, the nature of the litigation, the prior experience of the Company and the amounts that the Company has accrued for known contingencies, that the ultimate disposition of these matters will not materially affect the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

13

Table of Contents

You should read the following discussion together with our condensed unaudited financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this filing. This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of federal securities laws. See “Forward-looking Statements” above.

We use a 52-, 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Wednesday of the calendar year. In a 52-week fiscal year, each quarter includes 13 weeks of operations; in a 53-week fiscal year, the first, second and third quarters each include 13 weeks of operations and the fourth quarter includes 14 weeks of operations. Approximately every six or seven years a 53-week fiscal year occurs. Fiscal year 2003, which ended December 31, 2003, was a 53-week fiscal year. Because fiscal year 2003 had 53 weeks as compared to a normal 52 weeks, we have included in this report same-store sales comparisons for periods in 2003 compared to 2004 on a calendar month basis. Therefore, the second quarter fiscal year 2003 and 2004 same store sales comparisons compare weeks 15 through 27 of fiscal 2003 with weeks 14 through 26 of fiscal 2004 because fiscal 2003 had 53 weeks as compared to a normal 52 weeks. Similarly, the first six months 2003 and 2004 same store sales comparison compare weeks 2 through 27 of fiscal 2003 with weeks 1 through 26 of fiscal 2004. Unless otherwise indicated, all other comparisons under this heading between the second quarters and first six months of fiscal years 2003 and 2004 refer to the 13-week and 26-week periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004, respectively. References to “our restaurant system” mean both company-operated and franchised restaurants. Unless otherwise indicated, references to “our restaurants” or results or statistics attributable to one or more restaurants without expressly identifying them as company-operated, franchise or the entire restaurant system mean our company-operated restaurants only.

Overview

El Pollo Loco, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our”) owns, operates and franchises quick service restaurants (“QSR”) specializing in marinated flame-grilled chicken. As of June 30, 2004, our restaurant system had 317 restaurants, consisting of 139 company-operated and 178 franchised locations, located principally in California, with additional restaurants in Arizona, Nevada and Texas. In the second quarter of 2004, we opened one new company-operated and two new franchise restaurants, we acquired two franchise restaurants, we closed one company store and a franchisee temporarily closed one store. Our typical restaurant is a freestanding building ranging from approximately 2,200 to 2,600 square feet with seating for approximately 60 customers and allowing drive-thru service.

Our total revenue is derived from two primary sources, company-operated restaurant revenue and franchise revenue, the latter of which is comprised principally of franchise royalties, franchise fees and sublease rental income. For the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004, same-store sales for restaurants systemwide increased 10.4% over the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. This six month result decreased from the 13.1% same-store sales increase for restaurants systemwide in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. We expect that same-store sales will continue to be positive through the remainder of fiscal 2004, but that the rate of increase will continue to moderate as we start comparing same-store sales to relatively strong comparable quarters from the previous year that were impacted by similar factors, including price increases.

14

Table of Contents

The increase in company-operated restaurant revenue since 2001 is due to growth in new company-operated restaurants and to increases in same-store sales, which includes price increases over this period. We expect to open four to eight company-operated restaurants per year over the next few years, which is consistent with our company-operated restaurant growth since 2001. Many factors can influence sales at all or specific restaurants, including increased competition, strength of marketing promotions, the restaurant manager’s operational execution and changes in local market conditions and demographics.

Franchise revenue consists of royalties, initial franchise fees and franchise rental income. Royalties average 4% of the franchisees’ net sales. We believe that new franchise restaurant growth will increase as we sign development agreements with experienced franchisees in new and existing markets. We currently have the approvals necessary to market to both new and existing franchisees in all states except Virginia. In fiscal year 2003, we entered into area development agreements that, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2004 but primarily in fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007, will result in area development fees being recognized when the related restaurants open. We sublease facilities to certain franchisees and the sublease rent is included in our franchise revenue. This revenue exceeds rent payments made under the leases that are included in franchise expense. Since we do not expect to lease or sublease new properties to our franchisees as we expand our franchise restaurants, we expect the portion of franchise revenue attributable to franchise rental income to decrease over time.

Product cost includes food and paper costs. This expense is our largest single expense, is subject to increase or decrease based on commodity cost changes, and depends in part on the success of controls we have in place to manage product cost in the restaurants. In February 2004, our contracts with our chicken suppliers expired. We entered into new one-year contracts that expire in February 2005 with our current suppliers that increased the price that we pay for chicken. We estimate that the higher contract prices will increase our product cost by over $1.5 million for fiscal year 2004. In anticipation of increased chicken prices, we implemented menu price increases averaging 1.0% in January 2004. In addition, based on current market conditions, we believe that the cost of chicken could increase again when these one-year contracts expire.

Payroll and benefits make up the next largest single expense. Payroll and benefits have been and remain subject to inflation, including salaries due to minimum wage increases and expenses for health insurance and workers’ compensation insurance. Workers’ compensation insurance costs are subject to a number of factors, and although the state of California recently passed legislation designed to reduce workers’ compensation insurance expense to employers, we cannot predict whether such legislation will actually reduce our workers’ compensation insurance expense. We have continued to see a reduction in the number of workers’ compensation claims due to employee safety initiatives that we began implementing in fiscal year 2003.

Restaurant other operating expense includes occupancy, advertising and other costs such as utilities, repair and maintenance, janitorial and cleaning and operating supplies.

Franchise expense consists primarily of rent expense that we pay to landlords associated with leases under restaurants we are subleasing to franchisees. Franchise expense usually fluctuates primarily as subleases expire and to some degree based on rents that are tied to a percentage of sales calculation. Since we do not expect to lease or sublease new properties to our franchisees as we expand our franchise restaurants, we

15

Table of Contents

expect franchise expense as a percentage of franchise revenue to decrease over time. Expansion of our franchise operations does not require us to incur material additional capital expenditures.

In December of 2003, we offered and sold $110.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 9¼% Senior Secured Notes due 2009 (the “Senior Secured Notes”). We used the gross proceeds from the sale of such notes, along with cash on hand, to reduce our outstanding bank debt by $39.5 million, to make a cash distribution to our parent, EPL Intermediate, Inc., in the amount of $70.0 million and to pay transaction-related fees and expenses of $5.7 million. EPL Intermediate, Inc. applied the proceeds received from us to repurchase all of the outstanding shares of its preferred stock in an aggregate amount of $20.1 million and to make a distribution to its parent, EPL Holdings, Inc., in the amount of $49.9 million. EPL Holdings, Inc. applied the proceeds received from EPL Intermediate, Inc. to make a dividend on its outstanding common stock. In connection with the sale of the Senior Secured Notes, we amended our senior credit agreement, which now provides for an $11.0 million term loan facility and a $15.0 million revolving credit facility (which was undrawn as of June 30, 2004, except for $5.7 million in outstanding letters of credit).

In March of 2004, our parent, EPL Intermediate, Inc., offered and sold $70 million in aggregate principal amount at maturity of 12½% Senior Discount Notes due 2010 (the “Intermediate Notes”). The net proceeds of the offering, after deducting expenses, were approximately $37 million, which EPL Intermediate, Inc. used to make a cash dividend to EPL Holdings, Inc. EPL Holdings, Inc. used the proceeds received from EPL Intermediate, Inc. to make a dividend on its outstanding common stock. Although we are not obligated to pay any of EPL Intermediate, Inc.’s obligations, EPL Intermediate, Inc. is a holding company whose only material asset is our outstanding common stock. Therefore, the principal source of the cash required to pay the obligations of EPL Intermediate, Inc. is the cash that we generate from our operations.

General and administrative expense has increased and is expected to continue to increase as a result of the sale of the Senior Secured Notes and the Intermediate Notes and the requirement to exchange both notes for registered notes under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We have incurred and will incur additional expenses due to rating agency fees, higher directors and officers insurance, compliance with laws relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, and to the revaluation of common stock options of EPL Holdings, Inc. as a result of these two transactions. In addition, in the first half of fiscal year 2004, we began to incur additional costs associated with developing disclosure controls and procedures and implementing the level of internal controls required for a company with registered securities. We expect these costs to increase in future periods. General and administrative expense has increased as a result of the new bonus arrangements that we implemented in connection with the sale of the Senior Secured Notes and the Intermediate Notes.

16

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Our operating results for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003 and 2004 are expressed as a percentage of restaurant revenue below:

13 Weeks Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to 13 Weeks Ended June 30, 2003

Restaurant revenue increased $5.2 million, or 11.0%, to $52.2 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $47.0 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003. This increase was primarily due to an additional $3.3 million in restaurant revenue resulting from a 7.1% increase in company-operated same-store sales for the 2004 period from the 2003 period. The same store sales increase was primarily due to a stronger economy, new product introductions and menu price increases averaging 1% in each of May 2003 and January 2004. Restaurants enter the comparable restaurant base for same-store sales the first full week after that restaurant’s one-year anniversary. The increase in restaurant revenue was also due in part to $0.9 million in sales generated from two restaurants that opened in 2004 and two franchise restaurants that were acquired by the Company in 2004, combined with $1.4 million from four restaurants opened and one restaurant acquired from a franchisee in fiscal 2003. Restaurant revenue was reduced $0.1 million by the closure of a restaurant in 2004 and $0.7 million by the sale to franchisees of two restaurants and the closure of one restaurant in fiscal 2003.

Franchise revenue increased $0.2 million, or 7.6%, to $3.5 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $3.3 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003. This increase is primarily due to an increase in royalties resulting from an 8.8% increase in franchise same-store sales.

Product cost increased $2.3 million, or 16.6%, to $16.4 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $14.1 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003. These costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue were 31.5% for the 2004 period compared to 29.9% for the 2003 period. This 1.6% increase resulted primarily from chicken prices increasing 1.1% as a percentage of restaurant revenue as our new chicken contract took effect in March.

Payroll and benefit expenses increased $1.1 million, or 8.5%, to $14.0 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $12.9 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003. The increase in these costs is due to $0.4 million resulting from net five additional restaurants and $0.7 million resulting from additional hourly labor to support increased same-store sales. However, as a percentage of restaurant revenue, these costs decreased 0.6% to, 26.9% for the 2004 period from 27.5% for the 2003 period. This decrease was due primarily to the positive impact same-store sales in the 2004 period had on labor

17

Table of Contents

costs as we added a lower percentage of labor to support incremental sales at existing restaurants.

Depreciation and amortization increased $0.2 million, or 5.1%, to $3.3 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 compared to $3.1 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003. These costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue decreased 0.4% to 6.2% for the 2004 period compared to 6.6% for the 2003 period. This percentage decrease is primarily due to the increased same-store sales as this expense is relatively fixed and does not fluctuate with changes in sales volumes.

Restaurant other operating expense, which includes utilities, repair and maintenance, advertising, property taxes, occupancy and other operating expenses, increased $1.5 million, or 16.3%, to $10.9 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $9.4 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003. These costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue increased 0.9% to 21.0% for the 2004 period from 20.1% for the 2003 period. The increase in operating costs is due primarily to increased advertising expenses of $1.1 million, of which $0.8 million was spending above the planned annual rate of 4% of restaurant revenue. Our advertising spending in the first quarter of 2004 was under the planned annual rate of 4% and each quarter individually may be above or below this planned annual rate, depending on the timing of marketing promotion and the relative weights and price of media spending. We still expect to reach our planned 4% rate for fiscal 2004. The increase in operating costs from the prior year also includes a $0.3 million increase of the variable portion of operating expenses due to the higher same store sales in the 2004 period and $0.2 million due to higher occupancy costs.

Franchise expense consists primarily of rent expense that we pay to landlords associated with leases under restaurants we are subleasing to franchisees. This expense usually fluctuates primarily as subleases expire and to some degree based on rents that are tied to a percentage of sales calculation. Franchise expense increased $0.2 million, or 25.7%, to $1.0 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 compared to $0.8 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003 due to expenses incurred to participate in certain Chicago food festivals to support our franchisee’s expansion into this market.

General and administrative expense increased $2.7 million, or 65.2%, to $6.8 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $4.1 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003. The largest component of the increase is due to $1.6 million in expenses for bonuses paid and accrued for option holders related to the revaluation of stock options. In addition, legal fees increased $0.5 million for the 2004 period primarily related to a settlement of an outstanding claim involving the real estate lease for a former restaurant and increased legal fees related to this claim and the Company’s dispute relating to rights to trademarks in Mexico. General and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue was 12.9% and 8.7% for the thirteen weeks ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Interest expense, net of interest income, increased $2.0 million, or 134.0%, to $3.5 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $1.5 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003. This increase is due to $2.5 million in additional interest expense related to our issuance of the Senior Secured Notes in December 2003, partially offset by $0.6 million in reduced interest expense due to lower outstanding balances on our term loan under our senior credit facility. Our average debt balances for the 2004 period increased to $131.6 million compared to $68.2 million for the 2003 period and our average interest rate increased to 8.78% for the 2004 period compared to 3.49% for the 2003 period.

18

Table of Contents

Our provision for income taxes consisted of income tax benefit of $(0.1) million and income tax expense of $1.8 million for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, or an effective tax rate of 41.0% for both periods.

Net income (loss) as a percentage of restaurant revenue decreased to (0.3)% for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2004 compared to 5.5% for the 13 weeks ended June 30, 2003 primarily due to higher interest expense, the bonus expense incurred related to the revaluation of options, increased advertising expenditures and increased legal fees.

Our operating results for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003 and 2004 are expressed as a percentage of restaurant revenue below:

26 Weeks Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to 26 Weeks Ended June 30, 2003

Restaurant revenue increased $12.6 million, or 14.0%, to $102.6 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $90.0 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. This increase was primarily due to an additional $8.5 million in restaurant revenue resulting from a 9.5% increase in company-operated same-store sales for the 2004 period from the 2003 period, which was primarily due to a stronger economy, new product introductions and menu price increases averaging 1% in each of May 2003 and January 2004. The increase in restaurant revenue was also due in part to $1.3 million in sales generated from two restaurants we opened in 2004 and two franchise restaurants that we acquired in 2004 combined with $3.2 million from four restaurants we opened and one restaurant we acquired from a franchisee in fiscal 2003. Restaurant revenue was reduced $0.1 million due to our closing a restaurant in 2004 and $1.4 million by our sale to franchisees of two restaurants and our closing one restaurant in fiscal 2003.

Franchise revenue increased $0.7 million, or 10.5%, to $6.9 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $6.3 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. This increase is primarily due to an increase in royalties resulting from an 11.1% increase in franchise same-store sales.

19

Table of Contents

Product cost increased $4.7 million, or 17.4%, to $31.9 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $27.2 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. These costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue increased 0.9% to 31.1% for the 2004 period from 30.2% for the 2003 period. This increase is primarily due to chicken prices increasing 0.7% as a percentage of restaurant revenue as our new contract took effect in March.

Payroll and benefit expenses increased $2.5 million, or 9.8%, to $28.0 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $25.5 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. The increase in these costs is due to $1.6 million resulting from additional hourly labor to support increased same-store sales and $0.9 million resulting from net five additional restaurants. However, as a percentage of restaurant revenue, these costs decreased 1.1% to, 27.3% for the 2004 period from 28.4% for the 2003 period. This decrease was due primarily to the positive impact same-store sales in the 2004 period had on labor costs as we added a lower percentage of labor to support incremental sales at existing restaurants.

Depreciation and amortization increased $0.3 million, or 5.6%, to $6.4 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 compared to $6.1 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. These costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue decreased 0.5% to 6.3% for the 2004 period compared to 6.8% for the 2003 period. This percentage decrease is primarily due to the increased same-store sales as this expense is relatively fixed and does not fluctuate with changes in sales volumes.

Restaurant other operating expense, which includes utilities, repair and maintenance, advertising, property taxes, occupancy and other operating expenses, increased $1.7 million, or 8.9%, to $20.2 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $18.6 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. The increase in these costs is due to $0.9 million resulting from the net five additional restaurants, $0.7 million related to expenses that are proportionally tied to increased same store sales due to the variable nature of the expenses and increased advertising expenses of $0.3 million in the 2004 period, offset by lower electricity costs in the 2004 period of $0.2 million. These costs as a percentage of restaurant revenue decreased 0.9% to 19.7% for the 2004 period from 20.6% for the 2003 period, which can be attributed to the higher same store sales leverage on the relatively fixed portion of these costs.

Franchise expense consists primarily of rent expense that we pay to landlords associated with leases under restaurants we are subleasing to franchisees. This expense usually fluctuates primarily as subleases expire and to some degree based on rents that are tied to a percentage of sales calculation. Franchise expense increased $0.2 million, or 9.8%, to $1.8 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 compared to $1.6 million for the 26 weeks June 30, 2003 due to the $0.2 million of expenses incurred to participate in certain Chicago food festivals to support our franchisee’s expansion into this market.

General and administrative expense increased $3.1 million, or 37.6%, to $11.4 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $8.3 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. This increase was due to $1.8 million in expenses for bonuses paid or accrued for option holders related to the revaluation of stock options and increased legal fees of $0.5 million. Salary and bonus increases and the filling of vacant supervisor and support staff positions also resulted in $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of the increase.

20

Table of Contents

Interest expense, net of interest income, increased $4.0 million, or 130.4%, to $7.1 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 from $3.1 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. This increase is due to $5.1 million in additional interest expense related to our issuance of the Senior Secured Notes in December 2003, partially offset by $1.3 million in reduced interest expense due to lower outstanding balances on our term loan under our senior credit facility. Our average debt balances for the 2004 period increased to $132.3 million compared to $69.2 million for the 2003 period and our average interest rate increased to 8.77% for the 2004 period compared to 3.48% for the 2003 period.

Our provision for income taxes consisted of income tax expense of $1.1 million and $2.4 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, or an effective tax rate of 41.0% for both periods.

Net income as a percentage of restaurant revenue decreased to 1.5% for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 compared to 3.8% for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003 primarily due to higher interest expense, the bonus expense incurred related to the revaluation of options and increased legal expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity requirements are to service our debt and meet our capital expenditure needs. Our indebtedness at June 30, 2004 was $131.3 million. Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. Based on our current level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations, available cash and available borrowings under the $15.0 million revolving portion of our senior credit facility will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $3.6 million from $5.4 million at December 31, 2003 to $1.7 million at June 30, 2004. During the first six months of fiscal 2004, we paid $1.4 million in deferred financing costs related to the December 2003 sale of the Senior Secured Notes. We also made cash bonus payments of $1.9 million in January 2004 and $1.3 million in April 2004 related to the revaluation of stock options in connection with the debt transactions. We do not expect to pay significant additional deferred financing costs, and although we will make cash bonus payments in future years related to the revaluation of stock options, the amounts paid will aggregate $2.1 million through 2009. In the first six months of fiscal 2004, we made $2.2 million in scheduled principal repayments on our term loan and a cash payment of $5.0 million related to interest expense for the Senior Secured Notes, which will be paid semiannually through 2009. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us under our senior credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we acquire restaurants from franchisees, our debt service requirements could increase. In addition, we may fund restaurant openings through credit received by trade suppliers and landlord contributions. If our cash flow from operations is inadequate to meet our obligations under our indebtedness we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the notes, on or before maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

21

Table of Contents

Working Capital and Cash Flows

We presently have, in the past have had, and may have in the future, negative working capital balances. The working capital deficit principally is the result of our investment to build new restaurants, remodel and replace or improve equipment in company-operated restaurants, and to acquire new restaurant information systems. We do not have significant receivables or inventories and we receive trade credit based upon negotiated terms in purchasing food and supplies. Funds available from cash sales and franchise revenue not needed immediately to pay for food and supplies or to finance receivables or inventories typically have been used for the capital expenditures referenced above and/or debt service payments under our existing indebtedness. As discussed above we spent cash on a number of items directly or indirectly related to our and our parent’s debt financings.

Operating Activities. We had net cash provided by operating activities of $9.3 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $14.3 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities of $5.0 million in the 2004 period compared to the 2003 period was primarily attributable to decreased net income in the 2004 period, decreased changes in accounts payable and accrued salaries and vacation balances, offset partially by increased advertising accruals in the 2004 period. In January 2004, we made $1.9 million in cash bonus payments related to the revaluation of stock options to acquire shares of the common stock of EPL Holdings, Inc. in connection with the sale of the Senior Secured Notes. An additional $1.3 million in cash was paid in April 2004 to make similar cash bonus payments in connection with the sale of the Intermediate Notes. We also made a cash payment of $5.0 million related to interest expense for the bonds which will be paid semiannually through 2009.

Investing Activities. We had net cash used in investing activities of $8.7 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 compared with net cash used in investing activities of $6.4 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. The increase in cash used in investing activities of $2.3 million was related to timing of expenditures for new store construction and we also incurred capital expenditures of approximately $2.4 million in 2004 related to the acquisition of two franchise restaurants in the greater Los Angeles area. We expect to spend approximately $14.0 million in capital expenditures in fiscal 2004, which includes $2.4 million in capital expenditures to complete the company-operated restaurant remodel program, $1.6 million to continue the rollout of new restaurant computer systems in our company-operated restaurants, $1.4 million to install chicken marinating tumblers in all company-operated restaurants and approximately $6.0 million to acquire from franchisees and build new company-operated restaurants.

Financing Activities. We had net cash used in financing activities of $4.3 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2004 compared with net cash used in financing activities of $4.0 million for the 26 weeks ended June 30, 2003. The increase in cash used in financing activities in the 2004 period was attributable to $1.4 million in deferred financing costs related to the issuance of the Senior Secured Notes that were paid in 2004, offset partially by $1.2 million less payments on the term loan portion of our senior credit facility.

22

Table of Contents

Debt and Other Obligations

Our senior credit facility provides for an $11.0 million term loan and $15.0 million in revolving availability, with a $10.0 million sub limit for letters of credit. In addition, we have $110.0 million outstanding in aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes.

At June 30, 2004, we had certain secured loan commitments, which were assumed in connection with purchases of restaurants from franchisees, of approximately $2.2 million.

We have capital leases relating to the building portion of certain land and building leases. These assets are amortized over the life of the respective lease.

At June 30, 2004, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling $5.7 million, which served as collateral for our various workers’ compensation insurance programs.

Franchisees pay a monthly advertising fee of 4% of gross sales for the Los Angeles designated market area or 5% of gross sales for other markets. Pursuant to our Uniform Franchise Offering Circular, we contribute, where we have company-operated restaurants, to the advertising fund on the same basis as franchised restaurants. Under our franchise agreements, we are obligated to use all advertising fees collected from franchisees to purchase, develop and engage in advertising, public relations and marketing activities to promote the El Pollo Loco brand.

In connection with the issuance of the Senior Secured Notes and the dividend paid by EPL Holdings, Inc. shortly thereafter, the exercise prices of outstanding options to purchase shares of the common stock of EPL Holdings, Inc. were adjusted. In addition, we accrued in December 2003 and paid option holders in January 2004 $1.9 million in bonuses. We will make additional cash bonus payments to the option holders related to the revaluation of the stock options at various times through 2009 subject to continued employment and other conditions, which we estimate will aggregate approximately $1.1 million. The combined effect of the adjustment to the exercise price and such cash bonus payments was to restore the approximate economic position of such option holders to that existing immediately before the dividend that EPL Holdings, Inc. paid to its stockholders following the sale of the Senior Secured Notes.

In connection with the sale by EPL Intermediate, Inc. of the Intermediate Notes in March 2004 and the dividend paid by EPL Holdings, Inc. shortly thereafter, the exercise prices of outstanding options to purchase shares of the common stock of EPL Holdings, Inc. were adjusted. In addition, we accrued and paid option holders in April 2004 $1.3 million in bonuses. We will make additional cash bonus payments to the option holders related to the revaluation of the stock options at various times through 2009 subject to continued employment and other conditions, which we estimate will aggregate approximately $1.0 million. The combined effect of the adjustment to the exercise price and such cash bonus payments will be to restore the approximate economic position of such option holders to that existing immediately before the dividend that EPL Holdings, Inc. paid to its stockholders following the sale of the Intermediate Notes.

No cash interest will accrue on the Intermediate Notes prior to March 15, 2009. Instead, the principal value of the Intermediate Notes will increase (representing accretion of original issue discount) from the date of original issuance until but not including March 15, 2009 at a rate of 12½% per annum compounded annually, so that the accreted value of the Intermediate Notes on March 15, 2009 will be equal to the full

23

Table of Contents

principal amount at maturity. Beginning on March 15, 2009, cash interest will accrue on the Intermediate Notes at an annual rate of 12½% per annum payable in arrears on March 15, 2010. Principal is also due March 15, 2010.

As of June 30, 2004, we were in compliance with all of the covenants contained in our senior credit facility and in the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes. As of such date we calculated all relevant ratios under our senior credit facility as follows:

These four ratios were permitted to be no greater than 4.75 to 1, no greater than 1.5 to 1, no less than 2.0 to 1 and no less than 1.1 to 1, respectively, as of such date. As of June 30, 2004, we calculated our “fixed charge coverage ratio” (as such term is defined in the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes), the only ratio under our indenture, at 2.85 to 1. Until December 15, 2005, the indenture permits us to incur indebtedness if our fixed charge coverage ratio for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available immediately preceding the date on which such indebtedness was incurred would have been at least 2.0 to 1, determined on a pro forma basis (including a pro forma application of the net proceeds therefrom), as if such indebtedness had been incurred at the beginning of such four-quarter period.

In addition, as of June 30, 2004, EPL Intermediate, Inc. calculated its fixed charge coverage ratio under the indenture governing the Intermediate Notes at 2.87 to 1. Such indenture permits EPL Intermediate, Inc.’s “restricted subsidiaries” (as such term is defined in such indenture), including us, to incur indebtedness, if EPL Intermediate, Inc.’s fixed charge coverage ratio for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available immediately preceding the date on which such indebtedness was incurred would have been at least 2.0 to 1, as determined on a pro forma basis (including a pro forma application of the net proceeds therefrom) as if such indebtedness had occurred at the beginning of such four-quarter period.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to recoverability of fixed assets, intangible assets, closed restaurants, workers’ compensation insurance and contingent liabilities. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Refer to the Amendment No. 3 to our registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-115486) filed August 11, 2004 for discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.

The inherent risk in market risk sensitive instruments and positions primarily relates to potential losses arising from adverse changes in interest rates.

24

Table of Contents

We are subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on our financing activities. This exposure relates to borrowings under our senior credit facility that are payable at floating rates of interest.

We do not consider the change in fair value of our long-term fixed rate debt resulting from a hypothetical 10% fluctuation in interest rates, as of June 30, 2004 to be material.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information that would be required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As of June 30, 2004, the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected that are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting subsequent to the date we completed our evaluation.

25

Table of Contents

PART II

None.

26

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

27