Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM              TO             

Commission file number 0-6354

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION

(949) 260-1200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS

DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $.10 Par Value — 8,971,697 shares as of August 9, 2004.

Table of Contents

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION

INDEX

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

ASSETS (note 8)

(Continued)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Note: The balance sheet at December 31, 2003 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003

(Unaudited)

(Continued)

4

Table of Contents

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003

(Unaudited)

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financial activities:

On March 16, 2004, the Company announced that the Board of Directors declared a 3 for 2 stock split and a cash dividend of $.12 per share ($.08 as adjusted for the 3 for 2 stock split). Both dividends were distributed on April 16, 2004 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 26, 2004. The cash dividend was paid on the number of shares outstanding prior to the 3 for 2 stock split. Stockholders entitled to fractional shares resulting from the stock split received cash in lieu of such fractional share based on the closing price of the Company’s stock on March 26, 2004. Cash dividends paid April 16, 2004 totaled approximately $726,000.

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Columnar Numbers in thousands except for share data)

(Unaudited)

On July 8, 2004, the Company received a written commitment from its primary bank (the “Bank”) for $80,000,000 in Senior Credit Facilities. The Bank will act as sole and exclusive Agent and Lead Arranger for the Senior Credit Facilities. The Senior Credit Facilities will consist of a $45,000,000 fully-secured long-term revolving line of credit and up to a maximum $35,000,000 senior secured term loan of which $20,000,000 will be drawn at closing to refinance existing indebtedness with the additional $15,000,000 available as needed subject to certain loan covenants to be finalized. The Senior Credit Facilities will mature five years from closing.

6

Table of Contents

The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:

Comprehensive income and its components consist of the following (in thousands):

7

Table of Contents

(American Vanguard was not named). The Complaint alleges that twenty-five plaintiffs incurred personal injuries, which include sterility and other reproductive injuries. The plaintiffs claim exposure from working on banana plantations (in Nicaragua) from dermal contact with 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (“DBCP”), inhalation of vapors, and from drinking water allegedly contaminated with DBCP. AMVAC filed an answer on May 5, 2004. On May 6, 2004, Dow Chemical removed the case from state court to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. It is anticipated that the focus for the next several months will be on the issue of the proper court to hear the case. No discovery has taken place, therefore, it is unknown as to how many of the plaintiffs, if any, claim exposure to AMVAC’s product and whether the plaintiffs’ claims are barred by applicable statutes of limitation. AMVAC intends to vigorously contest this case. As referenced in note 1, for further information on other litigation and environmental matters, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto (specifically note 5) included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Under its bylaws and certain agreements, the Company has agreed to indemnify its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences arising as a result of the officer or director’s serving in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer’s or director’s lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited. However, the Company has a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy that reduces its exposure and enables it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification obligations is minimal and has no liability recorded for these indemnification obligations as of June 30, 2004.

The Company enters into indemnification provisions under its agreements with other companies in its ordinary course of business (typically customers). Under these provisions the Company generally indemnifies and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of the Company’s activities or, in some cases, as a result of the indemnified party’s activities under the agreement. The indemnification provisions may survive the termination of the underlying agreement. In addition, in some cases, the Company has agreed to reimburse employees for certain expenses and to provide salary continuation during short-term disability. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions may be unlimited. The Company has not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification provisions. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of June 30, 2004.

In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46R”) (revised December 2003), Consolidation Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (“ARB 51”), which addresses how a business

8

Table of Contents

enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaces FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), which was issued in January 2003. Before concluding that it is appropriate to apply the ARB 51 voting interest consolidation model to an entity, an enterprise must first determine that the entity is not a variable interest entity (“VIE”). As of the effective date of FIN 46R, an enterprise must evaluate its involvement with all entities or legal structures created before February 2, 2003, to determine whether consolidation requirements of FIN 46R apply to those entities. There is no grandfathering of existing entities. Public companies must apply either FIN 46 or FIN 46R immediately to entities created after December 15, 2003 and no later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004 to entities considered to be special purpose entities. The adoption of FIN 46R had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

9

Table of Contents

AMERICAN VANGUARD CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Columnar Numbers in thousands)

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS/RISK FACTORS:

The Company, from time-to-time, may discuss forward-looking statements including assumptions concerning the Company’s operations, future results and prospects. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors. In connection with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company provides the following cautionary statements identifying important factors which, among other things, could cause the actual results and events to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by the forward-looking statements and related assumptions contained in the entire Report. Such factors include, but are not limited to: product demand and market acceptance risks; the effect of economic conditions; weather conditions; changes in regulatory policy; the impact of competitive products and pricing; changes in foreign exchange rates; product development and commercialization difficulties; capacity and supply constraints or difficulties; availability of capital resources general business regulations, including taxes and other risks as detailed from time-to-time in the Company’s reports and filings filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. It is not possible to foresee or identify all such factors. For more detailed information, refer to Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, Risk Factors, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Quarter Ended June 30:

The Company reported net income of $2,405,000 or $.25 per diluted share for the second quarter ended June 30, 2004 as compared to net income of $1,725,000 or $.19 per diluted share for the same period in 2003. (Net income and per share data have been restated to reflect the effect of a 3 for 2 stock split that was distributed on April 16, 2004.)

Net sales for the second quarter 2004 increased by 21% to $31,492,000 from $25,944,000 in the same period of 2003. The record sales levels were as a result of increased sales (primarily attributable to higher sales volume) of the Company’s product lines used for crop protection (primarily on cotton) as well as sales of Bifenthrin, the generic pyrethroid product the Company launched during the first quarter of 2004. There were no unusual or infrequent events or transactions outside of the ordinary course of business which materially impact net sales.

Gross profits increased to $13,748,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $11,953,000 in the second quarter of 2003. Gross profit margins declined to 44% in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 from 46% in the same period in 2003. The decrease in gross profit margins was due to the changes in the sales mix of the Company’s products.

Gross profit margins may not be comparable to those of other companies, since some companies include their distribution network in cost of goods sold and the Company, as well as others, include distribution costs in operating expenses (or other line items other than cost of goods sold).

Operating expenses, which are net of other income and expenses, declined by $77,000 to $9,497,000 in the second quarter of 2004 from $9,574,000 in the same period of 2003. The differences in operating expenses by specific departmental costs are as follows:

10

Table of Contents

Interest costs before capitalized interest and interest income were $328,000 in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $308,000 in the same period in 2003. The Company’s average overall debt for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 was $42,945,000 as compared to $31,168,000 for the same period in 2003. The higher overall debt levels accounted for the higher gross interest costs. The Company recorded $304,000 in interest income during the second quarter of 2003 related to income taxes receivable from the state of California as a result of filing amended tax returns for the years ended December 31, 1995 through 1998. (The overall after tax effect of recording the receivable due from California (franchise tax) generated $.03 per diluted share in the three months ended June 30, 2003. The refund was received in July 2003.) The Company capitalized $20,000 of interest costs related to construction in progress during the second quarter of 2004 as compared to $148,000 in 2003.

Income tax expense increased by $740,000 to $1,538,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $798,000 for the same period 2003. The Company’s effective tax rate was approximately 39% in the second quarter of 2004 as compared to approximately 32% in 2003. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 reflected the benefits of the aforementioned tax refund received from the state of California in July 2003.

Weather patterns can have an impact on the Company’s operations. Weather conditions influence pest population by impacting gestation cycles for particular pests and the effectiveness of some of the Company’s products, among other factors. The end user of some of the Company’s products may, because of weather patterns, delay or intermittently disrupt field work during the planting season which may result in a reduction of the use of some of the Company’s products. During the second quarter ended June 30, 2004, weather patterns did not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

Because of elements inherent to the Company’s business, such as differing and unpredictable weather patterns, crop growing cycles, changes in product mix of sales, ordering patterns that may vary in timing, and promotional programs, measuring the Company’s performance on a quarterly basis, (gross profit margins on a quarterly basis may vary significantly) even when such comparisons are favorable, is not as meaningful an indicator as full-year comparisons. The primary reason is that the use cycles do not necessarily coincide with financial reporting cycles. Profitability on a quarterly basis may vary because of the Company’s cost structure, the combination of variable revenue streams, and the changing product mixes.

11

Table of Contents

Six Months Ended June 30:

The Company reported net income of $4,608,000 or $.48 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to net income of $2,949,000 or $.32 per diluted share for the same period in 2003. (Net income per share data have been restated to reflect the effect of a 3 for 2 stock split that was distributed on April 16, 2004.)

Net sales for the six months of 2004 increased by 23% to $65,711,000 from $53,286,000 in the same period of 2003. The record sales levels were as a result of increased sales (primarily attributable to higher sales volume) of the Company’s product lines used for crop protection (primarily on cotton) as well as sales of Bifenthrin, the generic pyrethroid product the Company launched during the first quarter of 2004. There were no unusual or infrequent events or transactions outside of the ordinary course of business which materially impact net sales.

Gross profits increased to $28,938,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 from $23,321,000 in the same period in 2003. Gross profit margins remained virtually unchanged at 44% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.

As stated above, gross profit margins may not be comparable to those of other companies, since some companies include their distribution network in cost of goods sold and the Company, as well as others, include distribution costs in operating expenses (or other line items other than cost of goods sold).

Operating expenses, which are net of other income and expenses, increased by $1,913,000 to $20,778,000 in the first six months of 2004 from $18,865,000 in the same period of 2003. The differences in operating expenses by specific departmental costs are as follows:

Interest costs before capitalized interest and interest income were $642,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $575,000 in the same period in 2003. The Company’s average overall debt for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was $38,277,000 as compared to $26,469,000 for the same period in 2003. The higher overall debt levels accounted for the higher gross interest costs. The Company recorded $304,000 in interest income during the six months ended June 30, 2003 related to income taxes receivable from the state of California as a result of filing amended tax returns for the years ended December 31, 1995 through 1998. (The overall after tax effect of recording the receivable due from California (franchise tax) generated $.03 per diluted share in the period ended June 30, 2003. The refund was received in July 2003.) The Company capitalized $35,000 of interest costs related to construction in progress during the first six months of 2004 as compared to $290,000 in 2003.

12

Table of Contents

Income tax expense increased by $1,412,000 to $2,946,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $1,534,000 for the same period 2003. The Company’s effective tax rate was approximately 39% in the first six months of 2004 as compared to approximately 34% in 2003. The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2003 reflects the benefits of the aforementioned tax refund received from the state of California in July 2003.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company used $2,032,000 in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2004. Net income of $4,608,000, non-cash depreciation and amortization of $2,451,000, and an increase in other payables and accrued expenses of $6,854,000 provided $13,913,000 of cash for operations. Increases in inventories, receivables and prepaid expenses and other current assets of $6,405,000 $3,268,000 and $328,000, respectively coupled with a reduction in trade accounts payable of $5,944,000 used $15,945,000 of cash for operating activities.

The Company used $4,719,000 in investing activities in the first six months of 2004. It invested $5,259,000 in capital expenditures while other non-current assets declined by $540,000.

Financing activities provided $7,792,000 during the first six months 2004. Net borrowing under the Company’s fully-secured revolving line of credit increased by $10,800,000. The Company received proceeds from new long-term debt (related to the refinancing of its property located at 2110 Davie Avenue, Commerce, CA) of $1,288,000 and received $27,000 from the issuance of common stock. The Company made principal payments on its debt of $3,296,000, paid cash dividends of $726,000 and purchased treasury stock for $301,000.

In May 2002, the Company entered into a new $45,000,000 fully-secured long-term credit agreement. The Company’s primary bank (the “Bank”) acted as sole administrative agent arranger and syndication agent. The Bank syndicated the new credit facility with another bank. The $45,000,000 credit facility consisted of a senior secured revolving line of credit of $35,000,000 and a $10,000,000 senior secured term loan. On March 23, 2004, the Credit Agreement was amended to increase the revolving credit limit to $45,000,000. The borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at the prime rate (“Referenced Loans”), or at the Company’s option, a fixed rate of interest offered by the Bank (“Fixed Loans”) for terms of one, two, three, six, nine or twelve months. Interest on the Referenced Loans are payable quarterly, in arrears, on the last day of each March, June, September, and December, and on the maturity date of such loan in the amount of interest then accrued but unpaid. Interest on the Fixed Loans are payable on the last day of the interest period, provided that, with an interest period longer than three months, interest is payable on the last day of each three-month period after the commencement of such interest period. The senior secured revolving line of credit is scheduled to mature on May 31, 2005. The term loan matures on May 31, 2007. The principal payments of the term loan are payable in equal quarterly installments of $625,000 each, on or before the last business day of each February, May, August and November, commencing May 31, 2003 and in one final installment in the amount necessary to repay the remaining outstanding principal balance of the term loan in full on the maturity date. The Company had $20,000,000 of availability under its revolving line of credit as of June 30, 2004.

On July 8, 2004, the Company received a written commitment from the Bank for $80,000,000 in Senior Credit Facilities. The Bank will act as sole and exclusive Agent and Lead Arranger for the Senior Credit Facilities. The Senior Credit Facilities will consist of a $45,000,000 fully-secured long-term revolving line of credit (replacing the aforementioned revolving line of credit) and up to a maximum $35,000,000 senior secured term loan of which $20,000,000 will be drawn at closing to refinance existing indebtedness with the additional $15,000,000 available as needed subject to certain loan covenants to be finalized. The Senior Credit Facilities will mature five years from closing.

Management continues to believe, to continue to improve its working capital position and maintain flexibility in financing interim needs, it is prudent to explore all available sources of financing.

13

Table of Contents

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”) Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirement for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The following is a summary of the Company’s agreements that the Company has determined is within the scope of FIN 45.

Under its bylaws, and agreements with its directors, the Company has agreed to indemnify its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences arising as a result of the officer or director’s serving in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer’s or director’s lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited. However, the Company has a directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy that reduces its exposure and enables it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification obligations is minimal and has no liability recorded for these indemnification obligations as of June 30, 2004.

The Company enters into indemnification provisions under its agreements with other companies in its ordinary course of business (typically customers). Under these provisions the Company generally indemnifies and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of the Company’s activities or, in some cases, as a result of the indemnified party’s activities under the agreement. The indemnification provisions may survive the termination of the underlying agreement. In addition, in some cases, the Company has agreed to reimburse employees for certain expenses and to provide salary continuation during short-term disability. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions may be unlimited. The Company has not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification provisions. As a result, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these provisions is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of June 30, 2004.

In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46R”) (revised December 2003), Consolidation Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (“ARB 51”), which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaces FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), which was issued in January 2003. Before concluding that it is appropriate to apply the ARB 51 voting interest consolidation model to an entity, an enterprise must first determine that the entity is not a variable interest entity (“VIE”). As of the effective date of FIN 46R, an enterprise must evaluate its involvement with all entities or legal structures created before February 2, 2003, to determine whether consolidation requirements of FIN 46R apply to those entities. There is no grandfathering of existing entities. Public companies must apply either FIN 46 or FIN 46R immediately to entities created after December 15, 2003 and no later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after March 15, 2004 to entities considered to be special purpose entities. The adoption of FIN 46R had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company’s accounting policies are more fully described preceding the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Certain of the Company’s policies require the application of judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. These judgments are based on historical experience, terms of existing contracts, commonly accepted industry practices and other assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the consolidated financial statements in the period they are determined to be necessary. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company’s critical accounting polices and estimates include:

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from sales is recognized at the time title and the risks of ownership passes. This is when the customer has made the fixed commitment to purchase the goods, the products are shipped per the customers’ instructions, the sales price is determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.

14

Table of Contents

Programs

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-9, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products (“EITF 01-9”). Upon adoption of EITF 01-9, the Company was required to classify certain payments to its customers as a reduction of sales. The Company previously classified certain of these payments as operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income. Additionally, the Company engages in various customer programs. The Company accounts for these programs as operating expenses in accordance with EITF 01-9 as the Company receives an identifiable benefit in exchange for the consideration otherwise program costs are treated as a reduction in sales.

Advertising Expense

The Company expenses advertising costs in the period incurred. Advertising expenses, which include promotional costs, is recognized in operating costs (specifically in selling expenses) in the consolidated statements of income.

Cost of Goods Sold

In addition to normal centers (i.e., direct labor, raw materials) of cost of goods sold, the Company includes such cost centers as Health and Safety, Environmental, Maintenance and Quality Control in cost of goods sold.

Other Than Cost of Goods Sold—Operating Expenses

Operating expenses include such cost centers as Selling, General and Administrative, Research and Product Development, Regulatory/Registration, Freight, Delivery and Warehousing in operating expenses.

Freight, Delivery and Warehousing Expense

Freight, delivery and warehousing costs incurred by the Company are reported as operating expenses. All amounts billed to a customer in a sales transaction related to freight, delivery and warehousing are recorded as a reduction in operating expenses. Freight, delivery and warehousing costs were $1,819,000 and $3,789,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $1,685,000 and $3,220,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.

Long-lived Assets

The carrying value of long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset. Generally, fair value will be determined using valuation techniques such as the present value of expected future cash flows.

Property, Plant and Equipment and Depreciation

Property, plant and equipment includes the cost of land, buildings, machinery and equipment, office furniture and fixtures, automobiles, and construction projects and significant improvements to existing plant and equipment. Interest costs related to significant construction projects may be capitalized at the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. Expenditures for maintenance and minor repairs are expensed as incurred. When property or equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation is removed from the respective accounts and the gain or loss realized on disposition is reflected in earnings. All plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method, utilizing estimated useful property lives. Building lives range from 10 to 30 years; machinery and equipment lives range from 3 to 15 years; office furniture and fixture lives range from 3 to 10 years, automobile lives range from 3 to 6 years; construction projects and significant improvements to existing plant and equipment lives range from 3 to 15 years when placed in service.

Foreign Currency Translation

Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, where the local currency is the functional currency, have been translated at year-end exchange rates and profit and loss accounts have been translated using weighted average yearly exchange rates. Adjustments resulting from translation have been recorded in the equity section of the balance sheet as cumulative translation adjustments in other comprehensive income.

15

Table of Contents

The effect of foreign currency exchange gains and losses on transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency are remeasured into the functional currency using the end of the period exchange rates. The effects of remeasurement related to foreign currency transactions are included in current profit and loss accounts.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values of cash, receivables and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt and note payable to bank is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. Such fair value approximates the respective carrying values of the Company’s long-term debt and note payable to bank.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes, including recognition of deferred tax assets for the anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement amounts and their respective tax bases. Income tax expense is recognized currently for taxes payable. The Company reviews its deferred tax assets for recovery. A valuation allowance is established when the Company believes that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the Company’s tax provision in the period of change.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The primary identifiable intangible assets of the Company relate to product rights associated with its product acquisitions. The Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, identifiable intangibles with finite lives are amortized and those with indefinite lives are not amortized. The estimated useful life of an identifiable intangible asset to the Company is based upon a number of factors including the effects of demand, competition, and expected changes in the marketability of the Company’s products. The Company tests identifiable intangible assets for impairment at least annually, relying on a number of factors including operating results, business plans and future cash flows. Identifiable intangible assets that are subject to amortization are evaluated for impairment using a process similar to that used to evaluate elements of property. The impairment test for identifiable intangible assets not subject to amortization consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying amount. An impairment loss, if any, is recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, which requires the Company to estimate the future cash flows anticipated to be generated by the particular asset(s) being tested for impairment as well as select a discount rate to measure the present value of the anticipated cash flows. When determining future cash flow estimates, the Company considers historical results adjusted to reflect current and anticipated operating conditions. Estimating future cash flows requires significant judgment by the Company in such areas as future economic conditions, industry-specific conditions, product pricing and necessary capital expenditures. The use of different assumptions or estimates for future cash flows could produce different impairment amounts (or none at all) for long-lived assets, goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. As of January 1, 2002, the Company had an immaterial amount of goodwill and amortization related to the goodwill. As such, the adoption of SFAS 142, did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

There are no material changes from the disclosures in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2003.

16

Table of Contents

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in all material respects in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the previous mentioned evaluation.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

The Company was not required to report any matters or changes for any items of Part II except as disclosed below.

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

OTHER MATTERS

The Company may be, from time to time, involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business. The results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty. The Company has and will continue to expend resources and incur expenses in connection with these proceedings. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in these proceedings. While the Company continually evaluates insurance levels for product liability, property damage and other potential areas of risk, an adverse determination in one or more of these proceedings could subject the Company to significant liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and operating results.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

Exhibit 31.1 - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 31.2 - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32.1 - Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Date of the Report: May 12, 2004

Description: On May 12, 2004 American Vanguard Corporation issued a press release announcing its earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. This report on Form 8-K was furnished under Item 12.

Date of the Report: June 24, 2004

Description: On June 24, 2004 American Vanguard Corporation issued a press release announcing that it had expanded the Company’s management team with the hiring of Mark H. Blincoe as Chief Administrative Officer.

Date of the Report: July 7, 2004

Description: On July 7, 2004 American Vanguard Corporation issued a press release announcing that it was added to the Russell 3000® and Russell 2000® Indexes.

17

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

18