UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-33071
Charter Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
United States | 58-2659667 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
600 Third Avenue, West Point, Georgia 31833
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(706) 645-1391
(Registrants telephone number including area code)
NA
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed from last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
As of August 4, 2004, the registrant had 19,823,905 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding. Of such shares outstanding, 15,857,924 shares were held by First Charter, MHC, the registrants mutual holding company and 3,965,981 shares were held by the public and directors, officers and employees of the registrant.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements of Charter Financial Corporation |
|||
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited) June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 |
1 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) Three and Nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
2 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) Nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
3 | |||
4 | ||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
9 | ||
Item 3. |
41 | |||
Item 4. |
41 | |||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. |
42 | |||
Item 2. |
42 | |||
Item 3. |
42 | |||
Item 4. |
42 | |||
Item 5. |
42 | |||
Item 6. |
42 | |||
43 | ||||
Certifications |
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which may be identified by the use of such words as believe, expect, anticipate, should, planned, estimated, and potential. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to our financial condition and results of operation and business that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates. These factors include, but are not limited to:
| general and local economic conditions; |
| changes in interest rates, deposit flows, demand for mortgages and other loans, real estate values, and competition; |
| the ability of our customers to make loan payments; |
| the performance of Freddie Mac common stock price and the level of dividends received; |
| changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines; |
| changes in legislation or regulation; and |
| other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products, and services. |
Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in any other public statements we make may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statements can be guaranteed. We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CHARTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003
(unaudited)
June 30, 2004 |
September 30, 2003 |
||||||
Assets | |||||||
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions |
$ | 10,414,932 | 9,926,321 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
11,190,359 | 1,994,168 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
21,605,291 | 11,920,489 | |||||
Loans held for sale, market value of $1,280,841 and $2,058,892 at June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively |
1,269,486 | 2,026,261 | |||||
Freddie Mac common stock |
292,477,650 | 242,904,000 | |||||
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations available for sale |
383,636,466 | 394,432,288 | |||||
Other investment securities available for sale |
21,877,409 | 21,628,603 | |||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
13,535,000 | 13,610,000 | |||||
Loans receivable |
318,984,288 | 299,877,198 | |||||
Unamortized loan origination fees, net |
(756,279 | ) | (544,202 | ) | |||
Allowance for loan losses |
(6,637,655 | ) | (6,779,576 | ) | |||
Loans receivable, net |
311,590,354 | 292,553,420 | |||||
Real estate owned |
278,586 | 683,577 | |||||
Accrued interest and dividends receivable |
3,050,395 | 3,200,112 | |||||
Premises and equipment, net |
10,870,185 | 9,382,894 | |||||
Intangible assets, net of amortization |
6,004,712 | 6,168,074 | |||||
Other assets |
1,536,899 | 1,985,645 | |||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,067,732,433 | 1,000,495,363 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity | |||||||
Liabilities: |
|||||||
Deposits |
$ | 293,002,847 | 279,385,708 | ||||
Borrowings |
392,969,000 | 388,441,220 | |||||
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
1,075,601 | 1,191,597 | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
105,289,891 | 88,196,330 | |||||
Other liabilities |
14,382,801 | 12,921,426 | |||||
Total liabilities |
806,720,140 | 770,136,281 | |||||
Stockholders Equity: |
|||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 19,823,905 and 19,822,405 shares issued at June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively; 19,571,176 and 19,569,676 shares outstanding at June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively |
198,239 | 198,224 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital |
37,898,720 | 37,491,011 | |||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 252,729 shares at June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003 |
(7,836,234 | ) | (7,836,234 | ) | |||
Unearned compensation - ESOP |
(2,454,940 | ) | (2,624,940 | ) | |||
Retained earnings |
62,075,695 | 59,190,493 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income: |
|||||||
Net unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale |
171,130,813 | 143,940,528 | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
261,012,293 | 230,359,082 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,067,732,433 | 1,000,495,363 | ||||
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
1
CHARTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
(unaudited)
Three Months June 30, 2004 |
Three Months June 30, 2003 |
Nine Months June 30, 2004 |
Nine Months June 30, 2003 |
||||||||
Interest and dividend income: |
|||||||||||
Loans receivable |
$ | 4,517,108 | 4,352,473 | 13,412,449 | 12,200,131 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations |
3,492,205 | 2,705,386 | 10,473,986 | 9,019,679 | |||||||
Equity securities |
1,492,535 | 1,363,959 | 4,305,673 | 3,922,457 | |||||||
Debt securities |
149,313 | 93,203 | 333,098 | 286,909 | |||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
10,968 | 29,950 | 49,025 | 82,233 | |||||||
Total interest and dividend income |
9,662,129 | 8,544,971 | 28,574,231 | 25,511,409 | |||||||
Interest expense: |
|||||||||||
Deposits |
1,166,005 | 1,464,855 | 3,584,507 | 4,255,969 | |||||||
Borrowings |
3,036,058 | 3,129,198 | 8,934,074 | 10,070,377 | |||||||
Total interest expense |
4,202,063 | 4,594,053 | 12,518,581 | 14,326,346 | |||||||
Net interest income |
5,460,066 | 3,950,918 | 16,055,650 | 11,185,063 | |||||||
Provision for loan losses |
| | 30,000 | | |||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
5,460,066 | 3,950,918 | 16,025,650 | 11,185,063 | |||||||
Noninterest income: |
|||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans and servicing released loan fees |
345,153 | 886,087 | 897,269 | 2,117,835 | |||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
624,986 | 463,488 | 1,860,357 | 1,221,523 | |||||||
Gain on sale of Freddie Mac common stock |
| | 1,125,022 | | |||||||
Gain on sale of mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and other investments |
37,787 | 4,199 | 115,259 | 107,038 | |||||||
Loan servicing fees |
56,587 | (11,473 | ) | 146,287 | 127,934 | ||||||
Equity in loss of limited partnership |
| | | (106,746 | ) | ||||||
Brokerage commissions |
61,029 | 89,992 | 188,911 | 258,700 | |||||||
Other |
3,939 | 35,520 | 187,771 | 44,285 | |||||||
Total noninterest income |
1,129,481 | 1,467,813 | 4,520,876 | 3,770,569 | |||||||
Noninterest expenses: |
|||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
2,482,222 | 2,845,347 | 7,533,588 | 7,910,574 | |||||||
Occupancy |
535,289 | 565,329 | 1,815,710 | 1,634,623 | |||||||
Legal and professional |
170,382 | 300,550 | 674,696 | 914,221 | |||||||
Marketing |
195,997 | 197,071 | 634,160 | 589,561 | |||||||
Furniture and equipment |
154,480 | 158,754 | 411,994 | 486,935 | |||||||
Postage, office supplies, and printing |
120,581 | 145,779 | 340,890 | 436,870 | |||||||
Federal insurance premiums and other regulatory fees |
55,797 | 52,074 | 165,775 | 156,133 | |||||||
Net cost of operations of real estate owned |
15,027 | 91,600 | 66,402 | 132,598 | |||||||
Deposit premium amortization expense |
50,593 | 56,518 | 163,362 | 75,606 | |||||||
Other |
332,466 | 381,741 | 988,604 | 1,230,910 | |||||||
Total noninterest expenses |
4,112,834 | 4,794,763 | 12,795,181 | 13,568,031 | |||||||
Income before income taxes |
2,476,713 | 623,968 | 7,751,345 | 1,387,601 | |||||||
Income tax expense |
604,685 | 80,188 | 1,957,851 | 180,861 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,872,028 | 543,780 | 5,793,494 | 1,206,740 | ||||||
Basic and diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.30 | 0.06 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
19,428,466 | 19,439,329 | 19,421,990 | 19,501,443 | |||||||
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding |
19,455,679 | 19,444,406 | 19,456,345 | 19,504,675 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
CHARTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|||||||
Net income |
$ | 5,793,494 | 1,206,740 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|||||||
Provision for loan losses |
30,000 | | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
718,835 | 714,226 | |||||
Allocation of ESOP common stock |
221,700 | 257,603 | |||||
Gain on sale of premises and equipment |
(2,500 | ) | (5 | ) | |||
Equity in loss of limited partnership |
| 106,746 | |||||
Amortization of premiums and discounts, net |
483,885 | 2,671,143 | |||||
Gain on sale of loans |
(897,269 | ) | (2,117,835 | ) | |||
Proceeds from sale of loans |
30,015,317 | 82,643,241 | |||||
Originations and purchases of loans held for sale |
(28,361,273 | ) | (79,306,707 | ) | |||
Gain on sale of Freddie Mac common stock |
(1,125,022 | ) | | ||||
Gain on sales of mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and other investments |
(115,259 | ) | (107,038 | ) | |||
Writedown of real estate owned |
70,380 | 126,429 | |||||
(Gain) loss on sales of real estate owned |
(23,055 | ) | 4,512 | ||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|||||||
Decrease in accrued interest and dividends receivable |
149,717 | 543,335 | |||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
354,128 | (5,047,419 | ) | ||||
Increase in other liabilities |
1,239,671 | 15,606,624 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
8,552,749 | 17,301,595 | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||
Purchases of equity securities and other investment securities available for sale |
(21,561,000 | ) | (4,917,760 | ) | |||
Proceeds from sale of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations available for sale |
104,617,435 | 8,679,176 | |||||
Principal collections on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations available for sale |
205,152,425 | 472,953,107 | |||||
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations available for sale |
(304,130,026 | ) | (441,541,644 | ) | |||
Net cash paid for EBA Bancshares, Inc. |
| (3,791,005 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of other investment securities available for sale |
13,769,236 | | |||||
Proceeds from sale of Freddie Mac common stock |
1,165,543 | | |||||
Proceeds from maturities of other securities available for sale |
7,000,000 | 4,000,000 | |||||
Purchase of FHLB stock |
(8,100,000 | ) | (11,822,500 | ) | |||
Proceeds from redemption of FHLB stock |
8,175,000 | 13,125,000 | |||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable, exclusive of loan sales |
(19,582,273 | ) | (13,401,101 | ) | |||
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned |
873,005 | 429,814 | |||||
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
2,500 | 16,122 | |||||
Purchases of premises and equipment, net of dispositions |
(1,948,148 | ) | (1,720,422 | ) | |||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(14,566,303 | ) | 22,008,787 | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||
Purchase of common stock for treasury |
| (8,716,147 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options |
43,890 | | |||||
Issuance of ESOP common stock |
533,834 | 123,691 | |||||
Dividends paid |
(2,908,291 | ) | (1,410,806 | ) | |||
Net increase in deposits |
13,617,139 | 3,808,268 | |||||
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
429,025,000 | 603,700,000 | |||||
Principal payments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
(425,425,000 | ) | (607,450,000 | ) | |||
Proceeds from other borrowings |
1,383,461,600 | 933,559,110 | |||||
Principal payments on other borrowings |
(1,382,533,820 | ) | (949,256,110 | ) | |||
Net decrease in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
(115,996 | ) | (341,856 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
15,698,356 | (25,983,850 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
9,684,802 | 13,326,532 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
11,920,489 | 10,118,137 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 21,605,291 | 23,444,669 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 12,515,684 | 14,430,996 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 1,354,453 | 1,191,632 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing activities: |
|||||||
Real estate acquired through foreclosure of the loans receivable |
$ | 515,339 | 245,090 | ||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
Charter Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) Basis of Presentation
Charter Financial Corporation (Charter Financial) is a federal corporation organized on October 16, 2001 by CharterBank (Bank) in connection with the reorganization of the Bank from a federal mutual savings and loan association into a two-tiered mutual holding company structure, as described more fully in Note 2.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Charter Financial and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, CharterBank and Charter Insurance Company as of June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, and for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are unaudited and have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in Charter Financials annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management the unaudited consolidated financial statements include all necessary adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented.
Charter Financial believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading; however, the results for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire fiscal year.
(2) Plan of Reorganization
On October 16, 2001, CharterBank converted from a federally-chartered mutual savings and loan association into a two-tiered mutual holding company structure and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Charter Financial. Charter Financial sold 3,964,481 shares of its common stock to the public, representing 20% of the outstanding shares, at $10.00 per share and received net proceeds of $37.2 million. Charter Financial contributed 50% of the net proceeds from the initial public offering to CharterBank. An additional 15,857,924 shares, or 80% of the outstanding shares of Charter Financial, were issued to First Charter, MHC. An Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) was established and such ESOP acquired 317,158 shares of Charter Financial in the offering, using the proceeds of a loan from Charter Financial. The ESOP loan is
4
recorded as unearned compensation reducing stockholders equity of Charter Financial. The net proceeds of the offering, adjusted for the ESOP, totaled approximately $34.0 million.
As part of its reorganization in structure, CharterBank organized First Charter, MHC as a federally-chartered mutual holding company which is registered as a savings and loan holding company with the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). First Charter, MHCs principal assets are its investment in Charter Financial and 400,000 shares of Freddie Mac common stock. First Charter, MHC does not engage in any business activity other than its investment in a majority of the common stock of Charter Financial, management of Freddie Mac common stock, and the management of any cash dividends received from Freddie Mac common stock. Federal law and regulations require that as long as First Charter, MHC is in existence it must own at least a majority of Charter Financials common stock.
(3) Earnings per Share
Earnings per share are calculated according to the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128 Earnings per Share. ESOP shares are only considered outstanding for earnings per share calculations when the shares have been committed to be released. Presented below are the calculations for basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:
Three Months June 30, 2004 |
Three Months June 30, 2003 |
Nine Months June 30, 2004 |
Nine Months June 30, 2003 | |||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,872,028 | $ | 543,780 | $ | 5,793,494 | $ | 1,206,740 | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
19,428,466 | 19,439,329 | 19,421,990 | 19,501,443 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.06 | ||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,872,028 | $ | 543,780 | $ | 5,793,494 | $ | 1,206,740 | ||||
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding |
19,455,679 | 19,444,406 | 19,456,345 | 19,504,675 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.06 |
5
(4) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The primary component of other comprehensive income (loss) for the Company is net unrealized gains and losses on Freddie Mac common stock and investment and mortgage-backed securities available for sale. The table below summarizes total comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Nine Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 8,920,367 | $ | (6,442,942 | ) | $ | 32,983,779 | $ | (12,165,009 | ) | ||||
Change in net unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities, net of income taxes |
7,048,339 | (6,986,722 | ) | 27,190,285 | (13,371,749 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,872,028 | $ | 543,780 | $ | 5,793,494 | $ | 1,206,740 | ||||||
(5) Stock-Based Compensation
During 2003, the Company amended the 2001 Stock Option Plan (the Plan) to allow for stock option awards for up to 707,943 shares of the Companys common stock to eligible directors and employees. At June 30, 2004, the Company had granted 152,000 options under the Plan of which 1,500 have been exercised and 1,000 forfeited. Under the provisions of the Plan, the option price is determined by a committee of the board of directors at the time of grant and may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant of such option. When granted, these options vest over a five-year period. The Company accounts for the Plan under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under the Plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.
6
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
Three Months Ended June 30 2003 |
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 1,872,028 | $ | 543,780 | $ | 5,793,494 | $ | 1,206,740 | ||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all stock options, net of related tax effects |
(36,709 | ) | (37,149 | ) | (110,127 | ) | (111,447 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 1,835,319 | $ | 506,631 | $ | 5,683,367 | $ | 1,095,293 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic as reported |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.06 | ||||||||
Basic pro forma |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.06 | ||||||||
Diluted as reported |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.06 | ||||||||
Diluted pro forma |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.06 |
(6) Business Combination
Effective February 21, 2003, Charter Financial acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of EBA Bancshares, Inc. (EBA), Opelika, Alabama, and its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Eagle Bank of Alabama, for a purchase price of approximately $8,600,000 in cash. The acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, hence, the results of operations of EBA have been included in the consolidated financial statements beginning on the aforementioned effective date.
The following summarizes the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations assuming EBA was acquired in a purchase accounting transaction on October 1, 2002 (in thousands).
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
||||
Interest income |
$ | 27,269 | ||
Net interest income before provision for loan losses |
$ | 11,964 | ||
Noninterest income |
$ | 3,808 | ||
Net loss |
$ | (816 | ) |
7
(7) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In conjunction with the acquisition of EBA, Charter Financial acquired the following goodwill and other intangible assets:
Goodwill |
$ | 4,325,282 | |
Deposit premium |
1,975,941 | ||
$ | 6,301,223 | ||
Goodwill and other intangible assets include costs in excess of net assets acquired and deposit premiums recorded in connection with the acquisition of EBA. The deposit premium is being amortized using the double-declining balance method over thirteen years. Charter Financial recorded amortization expense related to the deposit premium of $50,593 and $163,363 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, and $56,518 and $75,606 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.
At June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, other intangible assets are summarized as follows:
2004 |
2003 | ||||
Deposit premium |
$ | 1,975,941 | 1,975,941 | ||
Less accumulated amortization |
296,512 | 133,149 | |||
$ | 1,679,429 | 1,842,792 | |||
(8) Covered Call Program
At June 30, 2004, the Company had covered call options on Freddie Mac common stock outstanding on 116,500 shares for which it received $183,323 in premium. During the nine months ended June 30, 2004, holders of the covered call options exercised their options to purchase 19,500 shares of Freddie Mac common stock. The Company recorded a pretax gain of $1,125,022 on the sale of these shares to the option holders. At June 30, 2004, the fair value of the remaining options was $127,923. The Company has recorded the unrealized loss in the income statement as the derivative instruments are not accounted for as hedges.
8
Item 2 | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
The purpose of this summary is to provide an overview of the items management focuses on when evaluating the condition of the Company and our success in implementing our stockholder value strategy. Our stockholder value strategy has three major themes: (1) creating a larger, more profitable and more valuable retail banking franchise; (2) managing the substantial appreciation in our Freddie Mac common stock investment; and (3) efficiently utilizing our capital. Management believes the following points were the most important to that analysis this quarter.
| Third quarter earnings were up by $1.3 million which enhances the Companys ability to support a regular quarterly dividend on a forward looking basis. |
| The Banks net interest income has significantly improved over the past six quarters due to lower amortization of premiums on mortgage securities, reinvestment of cash flow, loan growth, lower deposit and borrowing interest expense, and overall net interest margin expansion. |
| Consistent with the Banks emphasis on attracting and retaining core deposits, deposit fee growth continued a positive trend. A significant portion of this growth trend of fees on core deposits is attributable to organic growth with the remainder attributable to the acquisition of $21.9 million in core deposits in connection with our acquisition of EBA Bancshares, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Eagle Bank, in February of 2003. |
| Gains from sales of one-to-four family mortgage loans declined in the current fiscal year due to sharply lower refinance volumes and, to a much lesser extent, the retention of 15 year fixed rate mortgage loans for the Banks own portfolio. |
| Our exposure to interest rate risk was similar to the prior quarter as we funded fixed rate mortgage securities with fixed rate borrowings. Our net interest income and net portfolio equity are somewhat at risk to changes in interest rates primarily due to mortgage loan and mortgage security prepayments slowing with higher interest rates. |
| Non-performing loans were consistent with the previous quarter and we had net recoveries of $117,868 for the quarter. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. No provision for the quarter was made as inherent loss and risk in the loan portfolio remained essentially the same. |
9
| The pilot program of writing covered call options on Freddie Mac common stock did not result in the sale of any Freddie Mac stock during the quarter. |
| Our book value per share was $13.44 at June 30, 2004, of which $9.05 is provided by the after tax equity in our Freddie Mac stock investment. |
| Freddie Mac common stock appreciated from $59.06 per share at March 31, 2004 to $63.30 at June 30, 2004. This was the primary reason for our other comprehensive income of $7.0 million and our increase of $0.42 in book value per share. |
| A regular quarterly dividend of 25 cents per share was paid to our minority, or public, shareholders during the quarter ended June 30, 2004. |
Management Strategy
We have a growth-oriented strategy focused on (1) expanding our retail banking operations and, thus, the franchise value of our retail bank, (2) managing our Freddie Mac common stock, while periodically reviewing strategies to increase or realize its value for our shareholders; and (3) effectively managing our capital.
Expanding Retail Banking Operations. Our retail banking strategy is to operate as a well-capitalized community bank dedicated to providing quality products, excellent service, and a superior customer experience at competitive prices. We have sought to implement this strategy by concentrating on our core product offerings, including residential and commercial mortgage loans and a variety of checking and saving products, while at the same time broadening our product lines and services, expanding delivery systems for our customers, and filling in our branch network. Our retail banking operations include all products and services in which we deal directly with customers through our branch network or other channels such as our website or telephone banking and includes our consumer and commercial customers.
Managing Our Freddie Mac Common Stock Investment. We manage our Freddie Mac common stock in several ways. Over the past ten years our total annual return on Freddie Mac common stock has averaged approximately 17%. Dividends on our Freddie Mac common stock are an important component of our shareholder value. Seventy percent of the Freddie Mac dividends are excluded from Charter Financials taxable income through the corporate dividends received exclusion. As a result, the effective federal tax rate on these dividends is approximately 11.4%. The Freddie Mac dividend, when combined with the 70% corporate dividend exclusion, First Charter, MHCs (MHC) dividend waiver and the recently enacted 15% personal tax rate reduction on dividends received by individuals, creates a tax efficient means for our stockholders to receive value from our Freddie Mac common stock investment. First Charter MHC, subject to the approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision, makes its own determination with respect to each dividend payment from Charter Financial as to whether that dividend payment to it will be waived. In 2003, we implemented a pilot program of selling covered call options on the Freddie Mac common stock as a means of enhancing our return on this investment. We continue to review our investment in Freddie Mac common stock in light of existing conditions and what is in the best interests of our stockholders.
10
Managing our Capital. The third major component of our strategy is capital management. We increased our capital leverage with the additional retail assets and deposits acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition. While our current retail focus is increasing market share within our existing market, we regularly evaluate expanding our capital leverage by extending our market area through de novo branching or acquisitions. We continue to maintain our wholesale leverage of mortgage securities and borrowings. Our wholesale leverage consists primarily of mortgage securities which are funded by brokered or credit union certificates of deposit or borrowings. Wholesale leverage generally enhances income, but not franchise value, and thus is a low priority capital management tool for us. We increased our regular quarterly dividend from 10 cents to 20 cents per share in the third fiscal quarter of 2003 and to 25 cents in the third quarter of 2004. Our capacity to pay dividends is enhanced when First Charter, MHC is willing and permitted by the Office of Thrift Supervision to waive receipt of its portion of the dividends. We continue to evaluate our dividend policy and the appropriateness of special dividends and/or share repurchases.
General
Charter Financial Corporation (Charter Financial, Company, us, or we) is a federally-chartered corporation organized in 2001, and is registered as a savings and loan holding company with the Office of Thrift Supervision. Charter Financial serves as the holding company for CharterBank (Bank). First Charter, MHC, a Federal mutual holding company (the MHC), owns approximately 80% of the outstanding shares of Charter Financials common stock. The MHC common stock is quoted on the National Market System of the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol CHFN. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to the Company, Bank or Charter Financial include Charter Financial and the Bank on a consolidated basis.
Charter Financials principal business is its ownership of CharterBank. Charter Financial also owns 1,665,500 shares of Freddie Mac common stock and Charter Insurance Company, a Hawaiian corporation, which generates fee income by reinsuring a portion of CharterBanks loan originations which carry private mortgage insurance. Charter Insurance Company owns 400,000 shares of Freddie Mac common stock. Additionally, CharterBank owns 2,555,000 shares of Freddie Mac common stock. On a consolidated basis, Charter Financial owns 4,620,500 shares of Freddie Mac common stock.
Our balance sheet at June 30, 2004 contains $292.5 million of Freddie Mac common stock, of which $286.2 million is unrealized gain. Noninterest-bearing liabilities include $110.5 million in deferred taxes related to the unrealized gain on the Freddie Mac common stock. Accumulated other comprehensive income includes $175.7 million representing the net unrealized gain on the Freddie Mac common stock.
CharterBank completed the cash acquisition of EBA Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Eagle Bank of Alabama, in February 2003. The acquisition added three branches in the Auburn-Opelika area of Alabama with $53.8 million in net loans and $62.1 million in deposits. CharterBank now operates a main office, seven full-service branch offices, and five loan production offices in Georgia and Alabama. We have an additional branch presently under construction in LaGrange, Georgia.
11
CharterBank is a service-oriented bank providing retail and small business customers with products and services designed to create long-term, profitable relationships. We offer numerous loan products, including residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial loans, home equity loans, second mortgages, and other products. CharterBank also offers deposit products, including consumer and commercial checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit.
CharterBanks results of operations depend primarily on net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets and the interest we pay on interest-bearing liabilities. Our interest-earning assets consist primarily of residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer loans, mortgage related securities, and equity securities such as our Freddie Mac common stock investment. Interest-bearing liabilities consist primarily of retail and wholesale deposits, repurchase agreements and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Atlanta.
Our results of operations also depend on our provision for loan losses, noninterest income and noninterest expense. Noninterest income includes gains on sale of loans, gains (losses) on sales of investment and mortgage-backed securities, deposit fees and other service fees and charges. Noninterest expense includes salaries and employee benefits, occupancy expenses and other general and administrative expenses.
Our operating results may also be affected significantly by economic and competitive conditions in our market area and elsewhere, including those conditions that influence market interest rates, government policies and the actions of regulatory authorities. Future changes in applicable laws, regulations or government policies may materially impact us. Furthermore, because our lending activity is concentrated in loans secured by real estate located in Georgia and Alabama, downturns in the regional economy encompassing these states could have a negative impact on our earnings.
12
Capital and Capital Management
CharterBank has traditionally been a well-capitalized savings association. The following table sets forth the tier 1 capital levels, risk-based capital levels, and ratios for the past several quarters.
For the Quarters Ended |
Tier 1 Capital |
Risk- Weighted Capital Ratio |
Regulatory Core Capital Ratio |
Total Risk - |
Total Risk - |
||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
$ | 70.8 | 13.73 | % | 9.08 | % | $ | 141.5 | 27.46 | % | |||||
March 31, 2004 |
69.2 | 14.16 | 9.38 | 135.6 | 27.71 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
67.4 | 13.90 | 8.89 | 134.7 | 27.81 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
66.4 | 13.80 | 8.78 | 131.0 | 27.23 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2003 |
68.0 | 14.22 | 8.81 | 130.7 | 27.34 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2003 |
67.6 | 14.33 | 9.38 | 135.2 | 28.67 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2002 |
73.9 | 16.39 | 11.03 | 147.8 | 32.78 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2002 |
73.6 | 16.34 | 10.16 | 147.3 | 32.67 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2002 |
72.5 | 15.97 | 9.84 | 144.9 | 31.94 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2002 |
72.6 | 17.18 | 11.04 | 144.5 | 34.27 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2001 |
72.1 | 16.46 | 11.16 | 144.0 | 32.85 |
At June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, we exceeded each of the applicable regulatory capital requirements. Tier 1 capital as a percent of total regulatory assets is consistently above the well-capitalized requirement of 5.0%. Total risk-based capital ratios significantly exceed the applicable well-capitalized requirement for risk-based capital of 10.0%. CharterBank exceeded the well-capitalized level of its various regulatory capital requirements by amounts ranging from $31.8 million to $90.0 million at June 30, 2004.
We initiated a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share in December 2002, doubled the dividend in June 2003 and increased it again to $0.25 per share in June 2004. We also paid a special dividend of $0.20 per share in March 2004. The MHC waived its receipt of dividends in all periods. Our Board of Directors will determine future dividends as well as other capital management strategies such as additional leverage, stock repurchases and special dividends. The Board of Directors will consider, among other factors, capital levels, results of operations, tax considerations, regulatory and regulatory business plan considerations, industry standards and economic conditions in determining such future dividends.
Charter Financials reporting of certain information under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) is not necessarily reflective of the process considered by the Board of Directors in connection with its dividend policy. Included in GAAP earnings per share calculations are the average shares held by Charter Financials majority shareholder, the MHC. The MHC has waived its right to receive dividends from Charter Financial since its formation and intends to continue to do so, subject to the approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. The following table reconciles the total voting shares with the number of shares receiving dividends as adjusted for the waiver of dividends by the MHC at June 30, 2004 and shows that the number of shares that typically receive dividends is a fraction, approximately one-fifth, of the total voting shares.
13
Total Voting Shares outstanding at June 30, 2004 |
19,823,905 | ||
Less: Unallocated shares in ESOP |
(245,494 | ) | |
Treasury Stock Ungranted MRP |
(252,729 | ) | |
Shares held by MHC |
(15,857,924 | ) | |
Total Shares eligible for dividends at June 30, 2004 |
3,467,758 | ||
The impact of the dividend waiver is illustrated through two ways of looking at our dividend payout ratio. Using GAAP basic earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2004 of $0.10 and the dividend paid during the same quarter of $0.25 per share, our dividend payout ratio was 250%. We believe that a better measure of cash dividends on our capital is to use net income of $1,872,000 for the same quarter and the total dividends paid of $867,000 (dividends paid to persons other than the MHC due to the dividend waiver). This approach yields a dividend payout ratio of 46.31%. We believe this measure demonstrates that we have a greater capacity to pay dividends than is indicated by our per share dividend payout ratio and that our current dividend payout ratio is sustainable for the foreseeable future.
Our capacity to pay dividends is limited by several factors including cash availability at Charter Financial, tax considerations, regulatory requirements and the MHCs willingness and ability to waive its dividends on the approximately 80% of our stock that it owns. The Office of Thrift Supervision, as part of its approval of our stock conversion in October 2001, prohibited any dividend from Charter Financial that would result in a return of capital to shareholders for a period of three years following the conversion. Historically, the MHC has waived its portion of the dividends we pay and intends to waive future dividends. The MHC is required to obtain approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision prior to waiving a dividend. The Office of Thrift Supervision considers a variety of factors in approving dividend waivers including its assessment of the rights of the MHCs stakeholders.
Charter Financials primary sources of cash are distributions from CharterBank, dividends on the Freddie Mac stock it owns and proceeds from possible sales of Freddie Mac common stock. CharterBank is generally permitted by the Office of Thrift Supervision to distribute its current years and prior two years undistributed earnings if CharterBank is well-capitalized after the distribution. Distributions in excess of this level require additional approval from the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Our total stockholders equity is made up of realized equity and unrealized equity. Realized equity includes common stock, additional paid-in capital, treasury stock, unearned compensation, and retained earnings, while unrealized capital is comprised of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Accumulated other comprehensive income (unrealized equity) is comprised of net unrealized holding gains on securities available for sale. Unrealized equity at June 30, 2004 was $171.1 million, a $27.2 million increase from $143.9 million at September 30, 2003. This increase was attributable to the $52.35 to $63.30 price per share increase in our investment in Freddie Mac common stock. The following table shows realized and unrealized equity and the Freddie Mac common stock price for the past several quarters. A comparison of the unrealized
14
equity and Freddie Mac common stock price demonstrates the relationship between the price of Freddie Mac common stock and our unrealized equity.
Total Capital |
Realized Equity |
Unrealized Equity |
Percentage of Unrealized Capital to Total Capital |
Freddie Common Stock Price | |||||||||||
(Dollars In Thousands) | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
$ | 261,012 | $ | 89,881 | $ | 171,131 | 65.56 | % | $ | 63.30 | |||||
March 31, 2004 |
252,938 | 88,856 | 164,082 | 64.87 | 59.06 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
248,743 | 87,444 | 161,299 | 64.85 | 58.32 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
230,359 | 86,419 | 143,940 | 62.49 | 52.35 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2003 |
226,997 | 84,408 | 142,589 | 62.82 | 50.77 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2003 |
236,784 | 87,208 | 149,576 | 63.17 | 53.10 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2002 |
257,528 | 91,825 | 165,703 | 64.34 | 59.05 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2002 |
249,166 | 93,205 | 155,961 | 62.59 | 55.90 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2002 |
262,280 | 92,099 | 170,181 | 64.89 | 61.20 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2002 |
266,367 | 92,273 | 174,094 | 65.36 | 63.37 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2001 |
272,851 | 91,473 | 181,378 | 66.48 | 65.40 |
As indicated in the following tables, other comprehensive income was $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, compared to a loss of $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The June 2003 loss was primarily the result of the decline in the price of Freddie Mac common stock during the period ended June 30, 2003. For the period ended June 30, 2004, the income was the result of the increase in the price of Freddie Mac stock which was partly offset by the unrealized loss on mortgage securities due to higher interest rates. The price of Freddie Mac common stock increased by $4.24 and decreased by $2.33 per share, for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003, respectively.
Shares |
Market Price Per Share |
Total Market Value |
Unrealized Gain, Net of Tax |
||||||||||
March 31, 2004 |
4,620,500 | $ | 59.06 | $ | 272,886,730 | $ | 163,718,144 | ||||||
June 30, 2004 |
4,620,500 | $ | 63.30 | $ | 292,477,650 | 175,746,969 | |||||||
Change in Freddie Mac stock |
$ | 4.24 | 12,028,825 | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss related to mortgage securities and other investments |
(4,980,486 | ) | |||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
$ | 7,048,339 | |||||||||||
Shares |
Market Price Per Share |
Total Market Value |
Unrealized Gain, Net of Tax |
||||||||||
March 31, 2003 |
4,655,000 | $ | 53.10 | $ | 247,180,500 | $ | 147,890,476 | ||||||
June 30, 2003 |
4,655,000 | $ | 50.77 | $ | 236,334,350 | 141,230,940 | |||||||
Change in Freddie Mac stock |
$ | (2.33 | ) | (6,659,536 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive loss related to mortgage securities and other investments |
(327,186 | ) | |||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss |
$ | (6,986,722 | ) | ||||||||||
15
As indicated in the following tables, other comprehensive income was $27.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004, compared to a loss of $13.4 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. The income and loss were primarily the result of the change in the price of Freddie Mac common stock during the nine month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. The price of Freddie Mac common stock increased by $10.95 and decreased by $5.13 per share, for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003, respectively.
Shares |
Market Price Per Share |
Total Market Value |
Unrealized Gain, Net of Tax |
||||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
4,640,000 | $ | 52.35 | $ | 242,904,000 | $ | 145,283,854 | ||||||
June 30, 2004 |
4,620,500 | $ | 63.30 | $ | 292,477,650 | 175,746,969 | |||||||
Change in Freddie Mac stock |
$ | 10.95 | 30,463,115 | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss related to mortgage securities and other investments |
(3,272,830 | ) | |||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
$ | 27,190,285 | |||||||||||
Shares |
Market Price Per Share |
Total Market Value |
Unrealized Gain, Net of Tax |
||||||||||
September 30, 2002 |
4,655,000 | $ | 55.90 | $ | 260,214,500 | $ | 155,893,352 | ||||||
June 30, 2003 |
4,655,000 | $ | 50.77 | $ | 236,334,350 | 141,230,940 | |||||||
Change in Freddie Mac stock |
$ | (5.13 | ) | (14,662,412 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income related to mortgage securities and other investments |
1,290,663 | ||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive loss |
$ | (13,371,749 | ) | ||||||||||
We believe that our ownership of Freddie Mac common stock continues to present attractive appreciation and dividend growth potential. Since the sale of Freddie Mac common stock would result in the realization of a substantial current tax liability for us, we have no current plans to liquidate a significant portion of our Freddie Mac common stock investment. We continually evaluate our investment in Freddie Mac common stock, taking into account the appreciation and dividend potential of the Freddie Mac common stock, the income tax impact of a strategy, alternative investments or uses of sales proceeds and the portion of our capital that the after-tax unrealized gain represents.
In June 2003, we implemented a pilot program of writing covered call options on Freddie Mac common stock with 250,000 shares of stock. When we write a call option we receive a fee or premium. If the call option expires unexercised, we retain this premium and record it as income. If the call option is exercised, the premium is added to the sale proceeds and increases the gain on the sale of Freddie Mac stock. If a call option is in the money as the maturity of the call approaches, we evaluate the economics of allowing the call to be exercised or buying the call to prevent its exercise. The decision whether to allow the exercise or to repurchase the option is based on several factors including the strike price at which the option would be exercised, alternative investments for the proceeds of the sale, tax considerations, the proportion of realized
16
to unrealized equity and the cost to repurchase the option. To the extent that the premium on unexercised options exceeds the premium when we repurchase a call option to prevent its exercise, and thus the sale of the underlying Freddie Mac stock, the net premiums enhance our income and our return on investment. We entered into the pilot program with a limited number of shares to improve our understanding of the mechanics and the economics of the program. We are considering a modest expansion of the pilot program to allow us to better determine the income enhancement targets and whether the program can be used to help us manage the proportion of realized capital to unrealized capital.
During the three months ended September 30, 2003, we sold 15,000 shares of Freddie Mac common stock, and during the nine months ended June 30, 2004, we sold 19,500 shares of Freddie Mac common stock through exercises of call options.
Critical Accounting Estimates
In reviewing and understanding financial information for the Company, you are encouraged to read and understand the significant accounting policies that are used in preparing the Companys consolidated financial statements. These policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements which were presented in the Companys 2003 annual report on Form 10-K.
The accounting and financial reporting policies of Charter Financial conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to general practices within the banking industry. Of these policies, management has identified the allowance for loan losses as a critical accounting policy that requires subjective judgment and is important to the presentation of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Please see Asset Quality for a further discussion of the Companys methodology in determining the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries are added to the allowance. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb losses on existing loans that become uncollectible, based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, historical loss rates, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions and trends that may affect a borrowers ability to repay.
The Company segments its allowance for loan losses into the following four major categories: 1) identified losses for impaired loans; 2) general reserves for Classified/Watch loans; 3) general reserves for loans with satisfactory ratings; and 4) an unallocated amount. Risk ratings are initially assigned in accordance with the Banks loan and collection policy. On an ongoing basis, an organizationally independent department reviews grade assignments and considers current information regarding a borrowers financial condition and debt service capacity, collateral condition and the effects of known and expected economic conditions. When the evaluation reflects a greater than normal risk associated with the individual loan, management classifies the loan accordingly. If the loan is determined to be impaired, management allocates a portion of the allowance for loan losses for that loan, generally based on the fair value of the
17
collateral as the measure for the amount of the impairment. Impaired and Classified/Watch loans are aggressively monitored. The reserves for loans rated satisfactory are further subdivided into various types of loans. The Company has developed specific quantitative reserve factors which it applies to each loan type to develop reserve components. These reserve factors are based upon economic, market and industry conditions that are specific to the Companys local markets and consider, but are not limited to, national and local economic conditions, bankruptcy trends, unemployment trends, loan concentrations, dependency upon government installations and facilities, and competitive factors in the local market. They are subjective in nature and require considerable judgment on the part of the Banks management. However, it is the Banks opinion that these items do represent uncertainties in the Banks business environment that must be factored into the Banks analysis of the allowance for loan losses. The unallocated component of the allowance is established for losses that specifically exist in the remainder of the portfolio, but have yet to be identified.
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. Approximately 87.71% of the Banks loan portfolio is secured by real estate. The loan portfolio is broadly composed of residential real estate loans of 44.00%, construction loans of 6.07%, commercial real estate loans of 37.64%, commercial non-real estate loans of 6.08% and consumer loans of 6.21%.
In recent years, the Bank has made an effort to build its business lines, and loans secured by commercial real properties now make up 37.64% of the loan portfolio. The Companys largest funded loan is a $6.2 million loan on a medical office building in the metro Atlanta area. The largest industry concentration of commercial purpose loans is the hospitality industry where we have an aggregate of $19.0 million in funded loans to various hotel and motel operations and an additional $3.5 million in unfunded construction commitments. In a significant number of the loans secured by commercial properties, the properties are occupied by the owner and the ongoing operations of the business provide the cash to service the debt. Construction and development loans, which comprise 6.07% of the real estate loan portfolio, are carefully monitored since the repayment is generally dependent upon the liquidation of the real estate and is impacted by national and local economic conditions.
While most originations of residential real estate loans are sold into the secondary market, the Bank chooses to keep some of them due to attractive risk and return characteristics. Such loans primarily make up the residential real estate mortgage portfolio. The remainder of the residential portfolio is composed of residential real estate mortgages held for sale. These loans are in the process of being sold into the secondary market and, since the credit, the rate and the purchase price have been approved by the buyer, the Company takes no credit or interest rate risk with respect to these loans.
While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Banks allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. If the regulatory agencies require us to make additions to our allowance for loan losses, the additions would reduce our net income and our capital.
18
Investments, mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations available for sale comprise a significant portion of the Companys balance sheet, and income on these assets is important to our operating results. Investments, mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations available for sale are reported at fair value, as determined by independent price quotations. Purchase premiums and discounts on investment securities are amortized and accreted to interest income using a method which approximates a level yield over the period to maturity of the related securities. Purchase premiums and discounts on mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are amortized and accreted to interest income using the interest method over the remaining lives of the securities, taking into consideration assumed prepayment patterns. Judgments and estimates are made in the determination of premium amortization on investment securities as well as the determination of income tax expense
Income taxes are a material expense for the Company. The Company receives a dividends received deduction for tax purposes on dividend income from our investment in Freddie Mac common stock. This deduction is the lesser of 70% of dividends received or 70% of taxable income before the dividends received deduction. The difference between 70% of taxable income and 70% of dividends can be significant. Since the Company does not file a consolidated tax return, this determination is made at the individual company level. The actual deduction will be determined at September 30, 2004 based on the level of dividends and the level of taxable income, and as a result could significantly impact our effective tax rate.
Also, the goodwill and core deposit premium are evaluated annually for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 144. The evaluation of impairment is a critical accounting policy due to the subjective nature of the calculation and the assumptions used.
Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2004 and
September 30, 2003
At June 30, 2004 our total assets were $1.1 billion, up $67.2 million from September 30, 2003. The increase in total assets resulted from a combination of the increased price of our Freddie Mac common stock and increased balances in our loan portfolio, and was offset by a decrease in our mortgage securities balances. On the liability side of the balance sheet, there were increases in deposits, accumulated other comprehensive income, and borrowings.
The following table shows the actual balance of loans outstanding at June 30, 2004 as well as the quarterly average balances of loans outstanding. The risk and return characteristics of loans vary significantly by the type of loan.
19
For the Quarters Ended |
1-4 Family Residential |
Construction |
Nonresidential Real Estate |
Consumer |
Commercial Real Estate |
Total Loans |
Percent Change per Quarter |
|||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Actual Balance: |
||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
$ | 140,354 | 19,351 | 120,060 | 19,827 | 19,392 | 318,984 | NA | ||||||||
Average Balance: |
||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
$ | 138,549 | 18,612 | 117,190 | 19,428 | 20,290 | 314,069 | 2.3 | ||||||||
March 31, 2004 |
$ | 135,671 | 17,145 | 113,155 | 19,778 | 20,967 | 306,716 | 1.0 | ||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
$ | 132,894 | 15,956 | 111,629 | 19,886 | 23,200 | 303,565 | 3.4 | ||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
$ | 125,283 | 16,617 | 108,026 | 19,995 | 23,624 | 293,545 | 6.4 | ||||||||
June 30, 2003 |
$ | 110,757 | 16,534 | 100,360 | 21,334 | 26,895 | 275,880 | 15.3 | ||||||||
March 31, 2003 |
$ | 105,334 | 14,290 | 78,399 | 20,175 | 21,162 | 239,360 | 9.7 | ||||||||
December 31, 2002 |
$ | 103,440 | 9,985 | 68,627 | 19,544 | 16,614 | 218,210 | 0.2 | ||||||||
September 30, 2002 |
$ | 105,461 | 7,161 | 68,491 | 19,912 | 16,661 | 217,686 | 0.7 | ||||||||
June 30, 2002 |
$ | 107,436 | 11,270 | 67,231 | 19,752 | 10,421 | 216,110 | (2.1 | ) | |||||||
March 31, 2002 |
$ | 114,801 | 10,809 | 66,114 | 20,787 | 8,308 | 220,819 | |
The quarter ended June 30, 2003 was the first full quarter which included the $55.3 million of loans acquired in the February 2003 Eagle Bank acquisition. One-to-four family loans have increased at a greater rate since the third quarter of fiscal year 2003 when we started retaining 15-year conforming loans. Future portfolio growth of these 15-year loans is dependent on interest rates as well as our future decisions to retain or sell these loans. The nonresidential real estate loan growth reflects our strategy to increase this portion of the portfolio. Future growth of our nonresidential real estate portfolio depends on interest rates, economic conditions and competitive pricing of these loans within our market. The average balance of commercial non-real estate loans increased in the quarter ended June 30, 2003 reflecting the loans acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition. Reductions in the commercial non-real estate portfolio in the following quarters represent our efforts to strategically reposition the portfolio.
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations decreased 2.74% from $394.4 million at September 30, 2003 to $383.6 million at June 30, 2004. The market value of Freddie Mac common stock increased $49.6 million, or 20.42%, from $242.9 million to $292.5 million, as the price per share of Freddie Mac common stock increased from $52.35 at September 30, 2003 to $63.30 at June 30, 2004.
Total deposits increased from $279.4 million at September 30, 2003 to $293.0 million at June 30, 2004. The Bank has de-emphasized certificates of deposit as sources of funding and focused on attracting and retaining core deposits (checking, money market and savings accounts) in order to reduce interest expense. Accordingly, as shown in the following table, over the last two years, core deposits have increased from $56.8 million to $130.3 million. Approximately $20 million of the core deposit increase in the March 2004 quarter was from money market deposits by one public funds entity. Approximately $21.9 million of the increase in the March 2003 quarter was a result of the acquisition of Eagle Bank. Fees on core deposit accounts increased from $246,000 in the March 2002 quarter to $673,000 in the March 2004 quarter and $625,000 in the June 2004 quarter.
20
For the Quarters Ended |
Deposit Fees |
Transaction Accounts |
Savings |
Money Market Accounts |
Certificates of Deposit | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
$ | 625 | $ | 61,783 | $ | 14,430 | $ | 54,038 | $ | 162,753 | |||||
March 31, 2004 |
673 | 61,672 | 14,816 | 53,514 | 160,999 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
563 | 56,061 | 14,610 | 28,884 | 171,765 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
496 | 53,048 | 15,419 | 31,079 | 179,840 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2003 |
463 | 50,024 | 14,647 | 33,934 | 178,006 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2003 |
356 | 46,609 | 14,779 | 34,169 | 181,926 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2002 |
402 | 32,621 | 9,302 | 26,167 | 140,462 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2002 |
351 | 34,237 | 9,132 | 26,110 | 141,267 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2002 |
289 | 32,297 | 9,317 | 26,689 | 146,064 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2002 |
246 | 30,495 | 8,955 | 17,312 | 147,185 |
Management will continue to use FHLB advances and repurchase agreements to fund our securities and loan portfolio growth. The maturity dates of new advances will be determined at the time the advance is taken and will be based on interest rates, Charter Financials interest rate risk profile and other factors. Repurchase agreements are generally less than 45 days to maturity and carry rates at or slightly above LIBOR. Borrowings increased $4.6 million or 1.15% from $388.4 million at September 30, 2003 to $393.0 million at June 30, 2004 as mortgage securities decreased $10.8 million.
Charter Financial recorded $4.3 million of goodwill and $2.0 million of core deposit intangible as a result of the acquisition of Eagle Bank in fiscal 2003. The core deposit intangible is amortized over 13 years using an accelerated method of amortization.
Our total stockholders equity is made up of realized equity and unrealized equity. Realized equity includes common stock, additional paid-in capital, treasury stock, unearned compensation, and retained earnings, while unrealized equity is comprised of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Total stockholders equity increased to $261.0 million at June 30, 2004 from $230.4 million at September 30, 2003. Unrealized equity increased to $171.1 million at June 30, 2004 from $143.9 million at September 30, 2003, primarily as a result of the price of Freddie Mac stock increasing to $63.30 per share at June 30, 2004 from $52.35 at September 30, 2003. Realized equity increased to $90.0 million at June 30, 2004 from $86.4 million at September 30, 2003.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months
Ended
June 30, 2004 and 2003
General
Net income was $1.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, which was $1.3 million higher than the net income of $543,780 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The
21
most significant factors in the income increase were the significantly higher net interest income and lower noninterest expense, which were partially offset by lower noninterest income and higher income tax expense.
Net Interest Income
As shown in the following table, net interest income increased $1.5 million from $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 to $5.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. For the same periods, our net interest spread increased from 0.53% to 1.25% and our net interest margin from 1.64% to 2.16%. Net interest rate spread is the difference between yield on assets and cost of liabilities. Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of interest earning assets.
For the Quarters Ended |
Net Interest Income |
Net Amortization of Premium on related |
Net Interest Rate Spread |
Net Interest Margin |
Yield on Freddie Mac |
||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
$ | 5,460 | $ | 101 | 1.25 | % | 2.16 | % | 2.05 | % | |||||
March 31, 2004 |
5,419 | 129 | 1.23 | 2.13 | 1.97 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
5,176 | 204 | 1.19 | 2.07 | 1.91 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
4,345 | 456 | 0.89 | 1.79 | 2.04 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2003 |
3,951 | 663 | 0.53 | 1.64 | 1.83 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2003 |
3,672 | 995 | 0.34 | 1.56 | 1.84 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2002 |
3,562 | 970 | 0.18 | 1.51 | 1.51 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2002 |
4,512 | 207 | 0.48 | 1.81 | 1.41 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2002 |
4,029 | 200 | 0.16 | 1.66 | 1.36 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2002 |
3,529 | 408 | (0.14 | ) | 1.52 | 1.35 |
As the preceding table illustrates, the net amortization of premiums on mortgage securities has had a significant impact on net interest income, spread and margin. Charges against interest income for net premium amortization reached its peak in the quarter ended March 31, 2003 with amortization of $995,000. By June 2004, net amortization of premiums on mortgage-related securities had returned to a more normal level at $101,000. The high level of premium amortization in the earlier periods was caused by the refinancing boom in one-to-four family mortgages which was triggered by low mortgage interest rates. As borrowers refinanced, mortgages underlying the securities we owned were paid off earlier than expected causing our securities to pay off sooner than expected and triggering acceleration of amortization.
Our net interest spread and, to a lesser extent, our net interest margins are also impacted by the yield on Freddie Mac common stock. As indicated in the table above, the yield on Freddie Mac common stock has increased and helped the net interest spread. The increase in the yield on Freddie Mac common stock is primarily from the increased dividend on Freddie Mac common stock.
The table below shows the yields or costs of other significant components of our net interest income.
22
For the Quarters Ended |
Yield on Mortgage Securities |
Yield on Loans |
Costs of Certificates of Deposit |
Costs of Deposits |
Costs of Borrowings |
||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
3.62 | % | 5.75 | % | 2.26 | % | 1.72 | % | 3.19 | % | |||||
March 31, 2004 |
3.40 | 5.79 | 2.38 | 1.81 | 2.94 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
3.47 | 5.87 | 2.48 | 1.95 | 3.01 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
2.84 | 6.12 | 2.64 | 2.08 | 3.19 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2003 |
2.78 | 6.31 | 2.91 | 2.31 | 3.53 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2003 |
2.85 | 6.73 | 3.16 | 2.52 | 3.66 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2002 |
3.22 | 7.00 | 3.45 | 2.76 | 3.79 | ||||||||||
September 30, 2002 |
3.99 | 7.54 | 3.68 | 2.99 | 3.75 | ||||||||||
June 30, 2002 |
3.76 | 7.53 | 3.93 | 3.24 | 3.94 | ||||||||||
March 31, 2002 |
3.36 | 7.94 | 4.33 | 3.63 | 4.15 |
Costs of borrowings steadily decreased from 4.15% in the quarter ended March 31, 2002 to 2.94% in the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as adjustable rate borrowings have decreased in rate and fixed rate borrowings have matured and been replaced by lower rate borrowings. The cost of borrowing rose to 3.19% in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as we replaced variable rate borrowings with fixed rate borrowings in the second and third quarters. While many of the borrowings have monthly rate resets, we have $227.0 million of fixed rate borrowings with a weighted average remaining maturity of approximately four years and an average rate of 4.50%.
The yield on mortgage securities has varied over the past ten quarters from a high of 3.99% in the quarter ended September 30, 2002 to a low of 2.78% in the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and ending at 3.62% for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. The yield in the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2003 was significantly impacted by high net premium amortization as mortgage security portfolios were paid off rapidly due to low mortgage rates and record rates of refinancing. Additionally, yields on securities declined during early fiscal 2003 as a result of managements decision to reinvest the heavy cash inflows from rapidly prepaying fixed rate mortgage securities into adjustable rate mortgage securities. In August of 2003, management increased its investment in fixed rate mortgage securities and, by June 30, 2004, fixed rate mortgage securities comprised 61% of the total mortgage securities portfolio, compared to 35% at June 30, 2003.
As shown in the preceding table, the yield on loans has declined 98 basis points over the past six quarters from 6.73% for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 to 5.75% for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. The reduction in yield is primarily the result of older, higher yield loans paying off in the low interest rate environment and being replaced with new, lower yielding loans. During June of 2003, the Bank began retaining 15 year single family loans in its loan portfolio. As of June 30, 2004, the Bank held $31.6 million of these loans in its portfolio with an average rate of 4.84%. Average loans outstanding increased from $275.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2003 to $314.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Approximately $55.3 million of loans were acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition.
Also, shown in the preceding table, the costs of deposits decreased 191 basis points from 3.63% for the three months ended March 31, 2002 to 1.72% for the three months ended June 30, 2004 quarter. The average cost of certificates of deposits dropped 207 basis points, more than
23
overall deposits. At current rates, managements ability to lower the rate on deposits is very limited.
The 219 basis point drop in loan yield, from the three months ended March 31, 2002 to the three months ended June 30, 2004, was roughly comparable to the 191 basis point decrease in the costs of deposits for the same period. For these same two periods, mortgage security yields increased by 26 basis points while borrowing costs decreased by 96 basis points. The increase in Freddie Macs dividend from 26 cents to 30 cents per share per quarter provided an increase in yield of 22 basis points on the Freddie Mac stock from June 2003 to June 2004. These factors provided a significant boost to the net interest spread, margin and income.
Interest income increased by $1.1 million to $9.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $8.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The main drivers were an increase of $787,000 in interest on mortgage securities and an increase in interest on loans of $165,000 resulting from higher average loan balances. Higher loan balances were due, in part, to the loans acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition.
Interest expense fell by $392,000 from $4.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 to $4.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Interest expense on deposits and borrowings decreased $299,000 and $93,000, respectively. The reduction in interest expense on both borrowings and deposits is due to lower interest rates.
In the following table, we derived the yields and costs by dividing income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. We derived average balances from actual daily balances over the periods indicated. Interest income includes the recognition of certain fees over the lives of the underlying loans. The table also shows the actual balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of June 30, 2004.
The table also depicts the significant effect the Freddie Mac common stock has on our traditional bank measures, such as net interest income, net interest rate spread, and net interest margin. The table shows these measures with and without the effects of the Freddie Mac common stock. We believe this comparison provides our shareholders with useful information so that they may compare CharterBank with its peer group using traditional bank ratios, excluding the effect of the Freddie Mac common stock. Freddie Mac common stock had an annual dividend return on cost basis of approximately 88.79% based on the dividend paid June 30, 2004. However, the dividend yield on the market value of the Freddie Mac common stock was 2.05%.
24
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
Balance as of June 30, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance |
Interest |
Average Yield/ Cost |
Average Balance |
Interest |
Average Yield/ Cost |
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
$ | 4,802 | $ | 11 | 0.92 | % | $ | 9,553 | $ | 31 | 1.30 | % | $ | 11,190 | |||||||
FHLB common stock |
12,225 | 106 | 3.47 | 13,002 | 154 | 4.74 | 13,535 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations available for sale |
386,216 | 3,492 | 3.62 | 389,541 | 2,705 | 2.78 | 383,636 | ||||||||||||||
Other investment securities available for sale |
21,524 | 149 | 2.77 | 10,837 | 93 | 3.43 | 21,877 | ||||||||||||||
Loans receivable (1) |
314,069 | 4,518 | 5.75 | 275,880 | 4,352 | 6.31 | 318,984 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets excluding Freddie Mac common stock |
738,836 | 8,276 | 4.48 | 698,813 | 7,335 | 4.20 | 749,222 | ||||||||||||||
Freddie Mac common stock |
271,041 | 1,386 | 2.05 | 265,068 | 1,210 | 1.83 | 292,478 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets including Freddie Mac common stock (2) |
1,009,877 | 9,662 | 3.83 | 963,881 | 8,545 | 3.55 | 1,041,700 | ||||||||||||||
Total noninterest-earning assets |
25,777 | | 27,007 | | 26,032 | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,035,654 | 9,662 | $ | 990,888 | 8,545 | $ | 1,067,732 | |||||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts |
$ | 40,160 | $ | 49 | 0.49 | $ | 29,183 | $ | 48 | 0.66 | $ | 40,661 | |||||||||
Savings accounts |
14,613 | 9 | 0.25 | 14,661 | 19 | 0.52 | 14,430 | ||||||||||||||
Money market deposit accounts |
55,508 | 199 | 1.43 | 33,813 | 115 | 1.36 | 54,038 | ||||||||||||||
Certificate of deposit accounts |
160,539 | 909 | 2.26 | 176,289 | 1,283 | 2.91 | 162,753 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
270,820 | 1,166 | 1.72 | 253,946 | 1,465 | 2.31 | 271,882 | ||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
380,950 | 3,036 | 3.19 | 354,288 | 3,129 | 3.53 | 392,969 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
651,770 | 4,202 | 2.58 | 608,234 | 4,594 | 3.02 | 664,851 | ||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
22,113 | 20,688 | | 21,121 | |||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities |
110,537 | | 114,848 | | 120,748 | ||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities |
132,650 | | 135,536 | | 141,869 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
784,420 | 4,202 | 743,770 | 4,594 | 806,720 | ||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
251,234 | | 247,118 | 261,012 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,035,654 | 4,202 | $ | 990,888 | 4,594 | $ | 1,067,732 | |||||||||||||
Net interest income including Freddie Mac common stock |
$ | 5,460 | $ | 3,951 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread, including Freddie Mac common stock (3) |
1.25 | % | 0.53 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin including Freddie Mac common stock (4) |
2.16 | % | 1.64 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio of interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities, including Freddie Mac common stock |
154.94 | % | 158.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income, excluding Freddie Mac common stock dividends |
$ | 4,074 | $ | 2,741 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread, excluding Freddie Mac common stock (5) |
1.90 | % | 1.18 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin, excluding Freddie Mac common stock (6) |
2.21 | % | 1.57 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio of interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities, excluding Freddie Mac common stock |
113.36 | % | 114.89 | % |
(footnotes on following page)
25
(1) | Non accrual loans have been included in the average balance of loans outstanding while interest income on these loans has been included only to the extent that interest income has been recognized in the income statement. |
(2) | Dividends on Freddie Mac common stock, of which the lesser of 70% of the dividend or 70% of taxable income is excluded from taxable income, are not computed on a tax equivalent basis. We do not hold any other tax exempt or tax advantaged securities |
(3) | Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
(4) | Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. |
(5) | Net interest rate spread, excluding Freddie Mac common stock, represents the difference between the weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets excluding Freddie Mac common stock and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
(6) | Net interest margin, excluding Freddie Mac common stock, represents net interest income excluding Freddie Mac common stock dividends as a percentage of average interest-earning assets excluding Freddie Mac common stock. |
The relatively low interest rate spread results from a combination of a balance sheet structure with a high proportion of Freddie Mac common stock, which has a low yield of 2.05% compared to loans and mortgage securities, and a high proportion of mortgage securities which also yield significantly less than loans. The margin is also impacted by high rate borrowings, which were put on in fiscal 2001 to reduce interest rate risk, and the recent effects of low interest rates on residential mortgage loans, including the high prepayments of portfolio mortgage loans and securities.
The following table is a reconciliation of net interest margin with and without Freddie Mac common stock.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||
Net Interest Spread |
Net Interest Margin |
Net Interest Spread |
Net Interest Margin |
|||||||||
Including Freddie Mac Common Stock |
1.25 | % | 2.16 | % | 0.53 | % | 1.64 | % | ||||
Excluding Freddie Mac Common Stock |
1.90 | 2.21 | 1.18 | 1.57 | ||||||||
Attributable to Freddie Mac Common Stock |
(0.65 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.65 | ) | 0.07 | |||||
Provision for Loan Losses
No provision for loan losses was taken for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
While national economic statistics indicate some improvement in overall economic conditions, the local economy remains uncertain with West Point Stevens, one of the largest employers in our market area, in bankruptcy. West Point Stevens announced in November 2003 and January 2004 that it was closing three mills and laying off 1,150 employees in our market area. The impact of mill closings has not yet impacted loan delinquencies. The lay-offs associated with the mill closings did not occur until late in the quarter ended March 31, 2004. In
26
addition, the individuals laid off had severance payments and presumably were able to make loan payments and provide for other living expenses from their severance. We anticipate that if there is any impact to our loan delinquencies, we will see it by the quarter end September 30, 2004. Actual charge-offs may be spread out over as much as two years.
As measured by our matrix methodology, the loan portfolio has approximately the same risk as it had on March 31, 2004. The loan portfolio grew by $8.3 million with approximately $2.4 million in growth in the low risk 1-4 family loans, approximately $3.3 million in growth in the moderate risk commercial real estate loans, $2.2 million growth in moderate risk construction loans, $678,000 growth in consumer loans and with shrinkage in the higher risk commercial loans. Non-accrual loans increased by $26,000 at June 30, 2004 compared to March 31, 2004.
The unallocated allowance increased by about $94,000. The allowance required by the matrix methodology increased by $24,000 while the total allowance increased by $118,000. Local economic conditions are very similar to those at March 31, 2004, indicating no increase in unidentified losses in the portfolio which we have reflected by not recording a provision for loan losses. We also experienced changes in other factors, which we believe are appropriately covered by the matrix methodology. These other factors are the increase in the portfolio and the high level of charge-offs which were offset by the reduction in non-accrual loans and the change to a slightly lower risk mix of loans.
The three-month period ended June 30, 2004 had a net recovery in the amount of $117,868 compared to net charge-offs of $222,406 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. Net recoveries in the amount of $37,276 in the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and the net charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 in the amount of $216,206 were attributable to loans acquired through the Eagle Bank acquisition.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income declined from $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The table below shows the components of noninterest income for the last ten quarters. The main reason for the decrease was the $541,000 decrease in the gain on sale of loans.
Fees on deposits increased to $625,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $463,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 as we increased both the balance and number of our transaction accounts and the levels of fees per account. Gain on sale of loans decreased to $345,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $886,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 as interest rates on home mortgages increased making it much less attractive for borrowers to refinance their mortgages. Other income for the June 2004 quarter included $61,000 in brokerage commissions on the sale of alternative investments, which was a decrease of $28,963 from the same quarter the prior year.
27
For the Quarters Ended |
Loan Servicing Fees |
Deposit Fees |
Gain on Sale of |
Gain (Loss) on Sale of Investments |
Equity in Gain (Loss) of Limited Partnership |
Other Income | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
$ | 57 | $ | 625 | $ | 345 | $ | 38 | | $ | 65 | |||||||||
March 31, 2004 |
58 | 672 | 309 | 627 | | 177 | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
32 | 563 | 242 | 576 | | 134 | ||||||||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
27 | 496 | 657 | 773 | | 170 | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 |
(11 | ) | 463 | 886 | 4 | | 126 | |||||||||||||
March 31, 2003 |
79 | 356 | 643 | | (61 | ) | 111 | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2002 |
61 | 402 | 589 | 103 | (46 | ) | 66 | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2002 |
64 | 351 | 539 | 205 | (792 | ) | 39 | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2002 |
72 | 289 | 354 | (1,481 | ) | 54 | 29 | |||||||||||||
March 31, 2002 |
89 | 246 | 438 | 15 | 268 | |
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense decreased $682,000 to $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $4.8 million for the same period in 2003. The table following shows the components of noninterest expense for the past six quarters.
June 2004 |
March 2004 |
December 2003 |
September 2003 |
June 2003 |
March 2003 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
Compensation & employee benefits |
$ | 2,482 | $ | 2,505 | $ | 2,547 | $ | 2,664 | $ | 2,845 | $ | 2,603 | ||||||
Occupancy |
535 | 621 | 660 | 603 | 567 | 565 | ||||||||||||
Legal & professional |
170 | 239 | 265 | 347 | 301 | 300 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
196 | 248 | 190 | 266 | 197 | 231 | ||||||||||||
Furniture & equipment |
154 | 134 | 123 | 144 | 159 | 179 | ||||||||||||
Postage, office supplies, and printing |
121 | 94 | 126 | 134 | 146 | 176 | ||||||||||||
Federal insurance premiums and other regulatory fees |
56 | 56 | 54 | 55 | 52 | 54 | ||||||||||||
Net cost (gain) of operations of real estate owned |
15 | 43 | 8 | 18 | 92 | 43 | ||||||||||||
Deposit premium amortization expense |
51 | 55 | 58 | 58 | 57 | 19 | ||||||||||||
Other |
333 | 288 | 369 | 368 | 379 | 430 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,113 | $ | 4,283 | $ | 4,400 | $ | 4,657 | $ | 4,795 | $ | 4,600 | ||||||
Compensation and benefits for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was $2.5 million, $363,125 lower than the three months ended June 30, 2003 and approximately $23,000 lower than the three months ended March 31, 2004. The quarterly cost of Charter Financials restricted stock grants, a component of compensation and benefits expense, dropped $180,000 per quarter as the first stock grants fully vested on August 1, 2003. Additional shares will fully vest on August 1, 2004 which will result in a reduction of approximately $89,000 in expense per quarter. This reduction is completely offset by additional shares that have been granted in July 2004 which nets to an increase of approximately $24,000 per quarter beginning in July 2004. Future levels of expense will depend on the level of dividends, the number of shares granted, the price of the stock on the date of the grant, and the vesting period.
28
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased to $605,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $80,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003, for an increase of $524,000. The effective tax rate increased from 12.85% for the three months ended June 30, 2003 to 24.41% for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The impact of the corporate dividends received deduction, which applies to dividends on Freddie Mac common stock, was the primary driver of the lower effective tax rate in the quarter ended June 30, 2003 and had a lesser impact on the quarter ended June 30, 2004 due to the higher level of taxable income in the 2004 quarter.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months
Ended
June 30, 2004 and 2003
General
Net income was $5.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004, which was $4.6 million higher than the net income of $1.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. The most significant factors in the earnings increase were the increase of $4.9 million in net interest income and the $1.1 million gain on the sale of Freddie Mac common stock related to our covered call program.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income increased $4.9 million from $11.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 to $16.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004. For the same periods, our net interest spread increased from 0.35% to 1.22% and our net interest margin from 1.57% to 2.12%.
The net amortization of premiums on mortgage securities has had a significant impact on net interest income, spread and margin. Charges against interest income for net premium amortization for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 totaled $2.6 million. For the nine months ended June 30, 2004, net amortization of premiums on mortgage-related securities had returned to a more normal level at $434,000. The high level of premium amortization in the earlier periods was caused by the refinancing boom in one-to-four family mortgages which was triggered by low mortgage interest rates. As borrowers refinanced, mortgages underlying the securities we owned were paid off earlier than expected causing our securities to pay off sooner than expected and triggering acceleration of amortization.
Interest income increased by $3.1 million to $28.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 from $25.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. The main drivers were an increase in interest on loans of $1.2 million resulting from higher average loan balances and higher yields on mortgage securities due to lower net amortization of premiums on mortgage securities. Higher loan balances were due, in part, to the loans acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition.
29
Interest expense fell by $1.8 million from $14.3 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 to $12.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004. Interest expense on deposits and borrowings decreased $672,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to the nine-month period ended June 30, 2003. The reduction in interest expense on both borrowings and deposits is due to lower interest rates. The decrease in interest expense on deposits was moderated by the increase in deposit balances.
Our net interest spread and, to a lesser extent, our net interest margins are impacted by the yield on Freddie Mac common stock. Net interest rate spread is the difference between yield on assets and cost of liabilities. Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of interest earning assets. As indicated in the following table, the yield on Freddie Mac common stock has increased with the increased yield helping the net interest spread. The increase in the Freddie Mac yield is from the increased dividend.
Costs of borrowings have decreased from 3.67% in the nine months ended June 30, 2003 to 3.04% in the nine months ended June 30, 2004.
In the following table, we derived the yields and costs by dividing income or expense by the average balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities, respectively, for the periods shown. We derived average balances from actual daily balances over the periods indicated. Interest income includes the recognition of certain fees over the lives of the underlying loans. The table also shows the actual balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of June 30, 2004.
The table also depicts the significant effect the Freddie Mac common stock has on our traditional bank measures, such as net interest income, net interest rate spread, and net interest margin. The table shows these measures with and without the effects of the Freddie Mac common stock. We believe this comparison provides our shareholders with useful information so that they may compare CharterBank with its peer group using traditional bank ratios, excluding the effect of the Freddie Mac common stock. Freddie Mac common stock had an annual dividend return on cost basis of approximately 85.87% based on the dividend paid June 30, 2004. However, the dividend yield on the market value of the Freddie Mac common stock was 1.98%. The appreciation in the market value of the Freddie Mac common stock is the reason for our strong accumulated other comprehensive income.
30
For the Nine Months Ended June 30, |
Balance as of June 30, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance |
Interest |
Average Yield/ Cost |
Average Balance |
Interest |
Average Yield/ Cost |
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
$ | 3,997 | $ | 49 | 1.63 | % | $ | 7,809 | $ | 81 | 1.38 | % | $ | 11,190 | |||||||
FHLB common stock |
12,561 | 330 | 3.50 | 13,455 | 478 | 4.74 | 13,535 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations available for sale |
399,875 | 10,474 | 3.49 | 406,875 | 9,020 | 2.96 | 383,636 | ||||||||||||||
Other investment securities available for sale |
15,384 | 333 | 2.89 | 11,205 | 287 | 3.42 | 21,877 | ||||||||||||||
Loans receivable (1) |
308,100 | 13,412 | 5.80 | 244,406 | 12,200 | 6.66 | 318,984 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets excluding Freddie Mac common stock |
739,917 | 24,598 | 4.43 | 683,750 | 22,066 | 4.30 | 749,222 | ||||||||||||||
Freddie Mac common stock |
268,067 | 3,976 | 1.98 | 266,588 | 3,445 | 1.72 | 292,478 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets including Freddie Mac common stock (2) |
1,007,984 | 28,574 | 3.78 | 950,338 | 25,511 | 3.58 | 1,041,700 | ||||||||||||||
Total noninterest-earning assets |
24,796 | | 20,373 | | 26,032 | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,032,780 | 28,574 | $ | 970,711 | 25,511 | $ | 1,067,732 | |||||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
NOW accounts |
$ | 36,825 | $ | 135 | 0.49 | $ | 25,866 | $ | 153 | 0.79 | $ | 40,661 | |||||||||
Savings accounts |
14,793 | 29 | 0.26 | 11,843 | 52 | 0.59 | 14,430 | ||||||||||||||
Money market deposit accounts |
42,867 | 436 | 1.36 | 29,974 | 311 | 1.38 | 54,038 | ||||||||||||||
Certificate of deposit accounts |
167,275 | 2,984 | 2.38 | 158,134 | 3,740 | 3.15 | 162,753 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
261,760 | 3,584 | 1.83 | 225,817 | 4,256 | 2.51 | 271,882 | ||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
391,396 | 8,934 | 3.04 | 366,311 | 10,070 | 3.67 | 392,969 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
653,156 | 12,518 | 2.56 | 592,128 | 14,326 | 3.23 | 664,851 | ||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
21,673 | 15,022 | | 21,121 | |||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities |
109,160 | | 112,317 | | 120,748 | ||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities |
130,833 | | 127,339 | | 141,869 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
783,989 | 12,518 | 719,467 | 14,326 | 806,720 | ||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity |
248,791 | | 251,244 | 261,012 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,032,780 | 12,518 | $ | 970,711 | 14,326 | $ | 1,067,732 | |||||||||||||
Net interest income including Freddie Mac common stock |
$ | 16,056 | $ | 11,185 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread, including Freddie Mac common stock (3) |
1.22 | % | 0.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin including Freddie Mac common stock (4) |
2.12 | % | 1.57 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio of interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities, including Freddie Mac common stock |
154.33 | % | 160.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income, excluding Freddie Mac common stock dividends |
$ | 12,080 | $ | 7,740 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread, excluding Freddie Mac common stock (5) |
1.87 | % | 1.07 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin, excluding Freddie Mac common stock (6) |
2.18 | % | 1.51 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio of interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities, excluding Freddie Mac common stock |
113.28 | % | 115.47 | % |
(footnotes on following page)
31
(1) | Non accrual loans have been included in the average balance of loans outstanding while interest income on these loans has been included only to the extent that interest income has been recognized in the income statement. |
(2) | Dividends on Freddie Mac common stock, of which the lesser of 70% of the dividend or 70% of taxable income is excluded from taxable income, are not computed on a tax equivalent basis. We do not hold any other tax exempt or tax advantaged securities. |
(3) | Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
(4) | Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets. |
(5) | Net interest rate spread, excluding Freddie Mac common stock, represents the difference between the weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets excluding Freddie Mac common stock and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
(6) | Net interest margin, excluding Freddie Mac common stock, represents net interest income excluding Freddie Mac common stock dividends as a percentage of average interest-earning assets excluding Freddie Mac common stock. |
The relatively low spread is a combination of a balance sheet structure with a high proportion of Freddie Mac common stock, which has a low yield of 1.98% compared to loans and mortgage securities, and a high proportion of mortgage securities which also yield significantly less than loans. The margin is also impacted by high rate borrowings, which were put on in fiscal 2001 to reduce interest rate risk as well as the recent effects of low interest rates on residential mortgage loans, and in 2003 the amortization of premium on CMOs and the high prepayments of portfolio mortgage loans and securities.
The following table is a reconciliation of net interest spread and net interest margin with and without Freddie Mac common stock.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||
Net Interest Spread |
Net Interest Margin |
Net Interest Spread |
Net Interest Margin |
|||||||||
Including Freddie Mac Common Stock |
1.22 | % | 2.12 | % | 0.35 | % | 1.57 | % | ||||
Excluding Freddie Mac Common Stock |
1.87 | 2.18 | 1.07 | 1.51 | ||||||||
Attributable to Freddie Mac Common Stock |
(0.65 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.72 | ) | 0.06 | |||||
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses was $30,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2004, while no provision was taken for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. The Bank had net charge-offs of $172,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $318,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. For the nine months ended June 30, 2004, $212,000 of the net charge-offs related to loans acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition, and which had previously been considered in the acquired allowance for loan losses.
32
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income improved from $3.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 to $4.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004. The gain on the sale of Freddie Mac common stock for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2004 was $1.1 million resulting from the exercise of calls written as a part of our pilot covered call program. Other income included $138,000 in income on the covered call program, which commenced near the end of fiscal 2003. Gain on sale of loans was $2.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003, and was reduced to $897,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 due to higher interest rates on 1-4 family mortgages and the resulting lower level of refinancing. Loan servicing income was $146,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $128,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. Loan servicing income has steadily declined as we currently sell loans servicing released and do not replace the runoff of loans serviced that provided this income stream. Our remaining equity in earnings of a limited partnership, which invested in loan servicing rights, was charged off in fiscal 2003, and, therefore, reflected no activity in the nine months ended June 30, 2004 compared to a loss of $107,000 in the nine months ended June 30, 2003. Other income for the 2004 nine month period included $189,000 in brokerage commissions on the sale of alternative investments which was a decrease from the same period in the prior year.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense decreased $773,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 from the same period in 2003. The table following shows the components of noninterest expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
For the Nine Months Ended | ||||||
June 30, 2004 |
June 30, 2003 | |||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||
Compensation & employee benefits |
$ | 7,534 | $ | 7,911 | ||
Occupancy |
1,816 | 1,635 | ||||
Legal & professional |
675 | 914 | ||||
Marketing |
634 | 590 | ||||
Furniture & equipment |
412 | 487 | ||||
Postage, office supplies, and printing |
341 | 437 | ||||
Federal insurance premiums and other regulatory fees |
166 | 156 | ||||
Net cost of operations of real estate owned |
66 | 133 | ||||
Deposit premium amortization expense |
163 | 76 | ||||
Other |
988 | 1,229 | ||||
Total |
$ | 12,795 | $ | 13,568 | ||
Compensation and benefits for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 was $7.5 million; approximately $377,000 lower than the nine months ended June 30, 2003. The quarterly cost of the Companys restricted stock grants dropped $180,000 per quarter as the first stock grants fully vested on August 1, 2003. The expense reduction in the restricted stock was partially offset by the expense of the employees acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition and by a general increase in
33
compensation and benefits. Additional shares will fully vest on August 1, 2004 which will result in a reduction of approximately $89,000 per quarter. This reduction is completely offset by additional shares that have been granted in July 2004 which nets to an increase of approximately $24,000 per quarter beginning in July 2004. Future levels of expense will depend on the level of dividends, the number of shares granted, the price of the stock on the date of the grant, and the vesting period.
Occupancy expense was up $181,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2003. Approximately $60,000 of the increase is directly attributable to the Eagle Bank acquisition, with other portions of the increase due to information systems including electronic banking expenses and indirectly attributable costs of operating facilities and servicing customers acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition.
Deposit premium amortization was $163,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $76,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. The Eagle Bank acquisition was effective in late February of 2003, so there was four months amortization recorded in the 2003 period.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased to $2.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004 from $181,000 for the nine months ended June 30, 2003, for an increase of $1.8 million. The effective tax rate increased from 13.03% for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 to 25.26% for the nine months ended June 30, 2004. The increase is due to a combination of higher pretax income and the higher effective tax rate. The impact of the corporate dividends received deduction, which applies to dividends on Freddie Mac common stock, contributed to the lower effective tax rate in 2003. The dividends received deduction had a greater impact on the 2003 period than the 2004 period due to the lower level of taxable income in the 2003 period.
34
Asset Quality
The following table shows that nonperforming loans rose from $5.1 million at September 30, 2003 to $5.5 million at June 30, 2004. Nonperforming loans acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition made up $495,000 of these loans at June 30, 2004. Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans grew from 1.71% at September 30, 2003 to 1.73% at June 30, 2004. Approximately 87% of our nonaccrual loans had real estate as collateral at June 30, 2004.
Nonperforming loans are not accruing interest. The following table shows under-performing loans and nonperforming assets.
June 30, 2004 |
September 30, 2003 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Under-performing loans |
$ | 334 | $ | 633 | ||||
Total nonperforming loans |
5,529 | 5,124 | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate, net |
279 | 684 | ||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 5,808 | $ | 5,808 | ||||
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
1.73 | % | 1.71 | % | ||||
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
0.54 | % | 0.58 | % |
Under-performing loans are loans 90 days or more delinquent or 90 days past maturity date that are still accruing interest. Under-performing loans decreased from $633,000 at September 30, 2003 to $334,000 at June 30, 2004. Under-performing loans at September 30, 2003 included a loan in the amount of $585,000 that we treated as nonperforming at December 31, 2003 and remains nonperforming at June 30, 2004. None of the under-performing loans were acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition.
The allowance for loan losses represents a reserve for probable loan losses in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated periodically based on a review of all significant loans; with particular emphasis on impaired, non-accruing, past due and other loans that management believes require special attention. The determination of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy.
Our allowance for loan loss methodology is a loan classification based system. We base the required reserve on a percentage of the loan balance for each type of loan and classification level. Doubtful, substandard and special mention loans are reserved at 50.0%, 15.0% and 5.0% respectively. Loans may be classified manually and are automatically classified if they are not previously classified when they reach certain levels of delinquency. Unclassified loans are reserved at different percentages based on our perception of the inherent losses in the type of loan. The conforming one-to-four family loans in the portfolio are reserved at lower percentages than other loans. Reserve percentages are based on each individual lending program and its loss history and underwriting characteristics, including loan to value, credit score, debt coverage, collateral, and capacity to service debt.
35
Additions to the allowance for loan losses are made periodically to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level based on managements analysis of loss inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount of the provision for loan losses is determined by an evaluation of the level of loans outstanding, loss risk as determined based on a loan classification system, the level of nonperforming loans, historical loss experience, delinquency trends, the amount of losses charged to the allowance in a given period, and an assessment of economic conditions. A provision for losses of $30,000 was charged for the nine months ended June 30, 2004, while there was no provision for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. Management considers the current allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on its analysis of the losses in the portfolio.
During fiscal 2004, the allowance for loan losses decreased by $142,000 to $6.6 million at June 30, 2004, due to net charge-offs of $171,921 offset by the provision. Of the net charge-offs, $212,205 related to loans acquired in the Eagle Bank acquisition while loans not acquired from Eagle Bank resulted in net recoveries. When reviewing the allowance for loan losses, it is important to understand our lending strategy. The largest components of our loan portfolio are one-to-four family residential loans and commercial real estate loans. Economic downturns resulting in reduced capacity to repay and/or depreciated property values are the chief risks to this lending strategy. We have mitigated the risk associated with these types of borrowers through prudent loan to value ratios and regular monitoring of economic conditions.
We have no loans that are not currently disclosed as non-accrual, adversely classified, past due, under-performing or restructured, where there is known information about possible credit problems of borrowers that causes management to have serious doubts about their ability to comply with present loan repayment terms.
Commitments
CharterBank had commitments to fund loans at June 30, 2004 of approximately $53.2 million. Commitments to fund loans include unused consumer credit lines of approximately $9.5 million, unused commercial credit lines of approximately $15.6 million, unfunded construction loans of approximately $16.7 million, mortgage loans, primarily for portfolio, of approximately $2.9 million, and nonresidential loans of approximately $8.5 million. Conforming one-to-four family thirty year fixed rate loans are generally sold on a best efforts basis at the time the rate is committed to the customer so the Company has no interest rate risk on these loans.
CharterBank is party to lines of credit in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. Lines of credit are unfunded commitments to extend credit. These instruments involve, in varying degrees, exposure to credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the financial statements. The Banks exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for unfunded commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank follows the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
36
Our commitments are funded through internal funding sources. These internal sources include scheduled repayments of loans and sales and maturities of investment securities available for sale or external funding sources through acceptance of deposits from customers or borrowings from other financial institutions.
The following table is a summary of our commitments to extend credit, leases and funding sources consisting of deposits, FHLB advances and borrowed funds.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations | |||||||||||||||
Due in 1 Year |
Due in 2 Years |
Due in 3 Years |
Due in 4 Years |
Due in 5 Years | |||||||||||
Loan commitments to originate 1-4 family mortgage loans |
$ | 2,923,577 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||
Loan commitments to fund construction loans in process |
16,699,081 | | | | | ||||||||||
Loan commitments to originate nonresidential mortgage loans |
8,548,950 | | | | | ||||||||||
Loan commitments to originate commercial loans |
180,000 | ||||||||||||||
Available home equity and unadvanced lines of credit |
25,064,287 | | | | | ||||||||||
Letters of credit |
203,500 | | | | | ||||||||||
Commitment to purchase mortgage-backed securities |
5,639,648 | | | | | ||||||||||
Lease agreements |
99,472 | 50,429 | 44,292 | 44,292 | 3,691 | ||||||||||
Deposits |
246,702,050 | 17,640,940 | 15,302,499 | 7,161,209 | 6,196,149 | ||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
122,269,000 | | | | | ||||||||||
FHLB advances |
43,700,000 | 25,000,000 | 50,000,000 | 25,000,000 | | ||||||||||
Total commitments and contractual obligations |
$ | 472,029,565 | $ | 42,691,369 | $ | 65,346,791 | $ | 32,205,501 | $ | 6,199,840 | |||||
Management regularly monitors the balance of outstanding commitments to fund loans to ensure funding availability should the need arise. Management believes that the risk of all customers fully drawing on all these lines of credit at the same time is remote.
Derivative Instruments
We had no commitments to originate loans held for sale at June 30, 2004. In prior periods these commitments were accounted for at fair value.
The commitments to sell loans are best effort, forward sale agreements, and not mandatory forward sale commitments. The best effort agreements are not derivative instruments and, therefore, are not accounted for as derivatives. The interest rate caps and floors in our adjustable rate loans are clearly and closely related to the interest rate in the loan and, therefore, the floors and caps are not accounted for separately from the loan as a derivative instrument. The
37
commitment to purchase investment securities is a firm forward commitment which is accounted for as a derivative instrument and recorded at fair value.
Liquidity
The term liquidity refers to our ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to fund loan originations, loan purchases, deposit withdrawals and operating expenses. The Office of Thrift Supervision requires that CharterBank maintain a sufficient amount of liquid assets to maintain its safe and sound operation. CharterBank monitors its liquidity position frequently and anticipates that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments.
Our primary sources of liquidity are:
| Deposits |
| Borrowings |
| Scheduled amortization and prepayments of loan principal and mortgage related securities |
| Maturities and calls of investment securities |
| Funds provided by operations |
Deposit flows are affected by the level of interest rates, by the interest rates and products offered by competitors, and by other factors. Total deposits were $293.0 million at June 30, 2004, compared to $279.4 million at September 30, 2003, for an increase of $13.6 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2004. Wholesale deposits were $49.9 million at June 30, 2004 compared to $49.7 million at September 30, 2003. Wholesale deposits included $16.9 million and $5.9 million in brokered deposits at June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively. Time deposit accounts scheduled to mature within one year were $116.5 million and $129.5 million at June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, respectively. While CharterBank has experienced certificates of deposit run-off, we anticipate that a significant portion of these certificates of deposit will remain on deposit. CharterBank continues to target growth of transaction-based deposit accounts to lower its overall cost of funds and provide cross-selling opportunities.
We can borrow funds from the FHLB based on eligible collateral of loans and securities. At June 30, 2004 our borrowed funds limit from FHLB was based on 40% of CharterBanks assets, or approximately $374.3 million. At June 30, 2004, we had outstanding FHLB borrowings of $270.7 million compared to $267.1 million at September 30, 2003, with unused borrowing capacity of $103.6 million and $39.4 million, respectively.
In addition, we may enter into reverse repurchase agreements with approved broker-dealers. At June 30, 2004, repurchase agreements totaled $122.3 million, a $1.0 million increase from the amount outstanding at September 30, 2003 of $121.3 million. Reverse repurchase agreements are agreements that allow us to borrow money using our securities as collateral. We can also obtain funds in the brokered deposit markets.
38
We can also obtain funds using our Freddie Mac common stock as collateral and have established a line of credit that provides for borrowing up to half of the market value of the stock. We consider this source of funds a last resort due to the potential adverse tax consequences on the dividends received deduction that exempts 70% of our Freddie Mac dividends from taxable income.
Loan repayment and maturing investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds. However, deposit flows, calls of investment securities and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities are strongly influenced by interest rates, general and local economic conditions and competition in the marketplace. These factors reduce the predictability of the timing of these sources of funds. Principal repayments on mortgage related securities totaled $205.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004. Ongoing levels of cash flow will depend on the level of mortgage rates and possible mortgage refinancing.
The low interest rate environment, specifically low one-to-four family mortgage rates, has dramatically increased refinancing activity and, accordingly, cash flow from prepayments of mortgage securities. The level of this increased cash flow depends on the ongoing level of refinancing, and, thus, it is difficult to determine at this time. However, most projections indicate higher interest rates and significantly lower levels of refinancing which would reduce this cash flow.
Our primary investing activities are:
| The origination of commercial real estate, one-to-four family real estate, commercial and consumer loans; |
| The purchase of mortgage and investment securities; and |
| Capital expenditures |
During the nine months ended June 30, 2004, we originated approximately $143.0 million in total loans. Residential mortgage loans accounted for 39.25% of the originations, construction loans for 18.94%, commercial and commercial real estate for 36.28%, and consumer loans for 5.53%. At June 30, 2004 and September 30, 2003, CharterBank had loan commitments to borrowers of approximately $53.2 million and $39.2 million, respectively, and available home equity and unadvanced lines of credit of approximately $25.1 million and $14.8 million, respectively. Of the $43.3 million in residential mortgage loans originated, $36.4 million were sold to investors. During the third quarter of 2003, CharterBank began retaining conforming 15-year one-to-four family loans, with approximately $31.6 million being retained as of June 30, 2004.
Purchases of mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and other investment securities totaled $325.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2004, and $446.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. CharterBank has relied on wholesale fundings including advances from the FHLB, repurchase agreements and brokered deposits to purchase securities in the past two fiscal years.
Capital expenditures of $1.9 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2004 included approximately $1.5 million for branch expansions. We anticipate that capital
39
expenditures for acquisition of branch sites, construction, expansion and renovation of retail facilities during the remaining quarter of fiscal 2004 will be approximately $1.5 million. We anticipate that capital expenditures for acquisition of branch sites, construction, expansion and renovation of retail facilities and possibly relocating support functions to one location as well as a change in our core application system during fiscal 2005 will be between $3.0 million and $7.0 million Except for these expenditures and any changes in our intentions to repurchase shares as outlined in Capital and Capital Management, we do not anticipate any other material capital expenditures during fiscal year 2004. We do not have any balloon or other payments due on any long-term obligations or any off-balance sheet items, other than the commitments and unused lines of credit noted above.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Charter Financial does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on Charter Financials financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Emerging Issues Task Force on November 13, 2003 issued EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. This new guidance is to be applied in other-than-temporary impairment evaluations performed in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. Disclosures are effective in annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003, for investments accounted for under FASB Statements No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and No. 124, Accounting for Certain Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Organizations. The disclosure requirements for all other investments are effective in annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The Company does not expect the adoption of EITF 03-1 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.
On March 31, 2004, the FASB issued an Exposure Draft titled Share-Based Payments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95 that addresses accounting for equity based compensation arrangements. The proposed statement would eliminate the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and replace some of the existing requirements under FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The proposed statement would require that such arrangements are accounted for using the fair-value-based method of accounting and the related cost expensed over the corresponding service period. It is anticipated that the final statement will be issued in the fourth quarter of 2004 and may be effective for the first quarter of 2005. The Company provides proforma disclosures related to stock-based compensation in Note 5.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
40
of America (GAAP). GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without consideration for changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on performance than do the effects of inflation.
Item 3 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
As of June 30, 2004, there were no substantial changes from the interest rate sensitivity analysis or the market value of portfolio equity for various changes in interest rate analysis calculated as of September 30, 2003. The foregoing disclosures related to the market risk of Charter Financial should be read in conjunction with Charter Financials audited consolidated financial statements, related notes and managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the year ended September 30, 2003 included in Charter Financials 2003 annual report on Form 10-K.
Item 4 | Controls and Procedures |
Management, including the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Vice President, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Vice President concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during the Companys last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
41
Part II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
None.
Item 2. | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
(e) During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2004, the Company did not repurchase any of its common stock. The Company currently does not have a stock repurchase program in place.
Item 3. | Defaults upon Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
Item 5. | Other Information |
(a) Not applicable
(b) Not applicable.
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) Exhibits
31.1 | Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. | |
32.1 | Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company furnished a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated April 27, 2004, pursuant to Item 12 to report the issuance of and furnish its press release describing second quarter earnings.
The Company filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated April 30, 2004 disclosing under Item 10 (i) that the Company amended the Conflict of Interest Policy and Code of Conduct of Charter Financial Corporation and CharterBank, (ii) that the Company amended the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers of Charter Financial Corporation, and (iii) that the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers of Charter Financial Corporation meets the requirements of a code of ethics as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K and applies to the Companys principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The amended Conflict of Interest Policy and Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers were filed as Exhibits 14.1 and 14.2, respectively, to the Form 8-K.
42
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CHARTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION (Registrant) | ||||||||
Date: August 11, 2004 | By: | /s/ Robert L. Johnson | ||||||
Robert L. Johnson President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||
Date: August 11, 2004 | By: | /s/ Curtis R. Kollar | ||||||
Curtis R. Kollar Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Treasurer |
43
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit |
Description | |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications | |
32.1 | Section 1350 Certifications |