Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2004

OR

For the Transition Period from              to             

Commission File Number 0-25032

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

600 Mayer Street

Bridgeville, PA 15017

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(412) 257-7600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

As of July 31, 2004, there were 6,305,891 shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

Table of Contents

UNIVERSA L STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains historical information and forward-looking statements that reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Statements looking forward in time, including statements regarding future growth, cost savings, expanded production capacity, broader product lines, greater capacity to meet customer quality reliability, price and delivery needs, enhanced competitive posture, effect of new accounting pronouncements and no material financial impact from litigation or contingencies are included in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

The Company’s actual results will be affected by a wide range of factors including the concentrated nature of the Company’s customer base to date and the Company’s dependence on its significant customers; the receipt, pricing and timing of future customer orders; changes in product mix; the limited number of raw material and energy suppliers and significant fluctuations that may occur in raw material and energy prices; the Company’s reliance on certain critical manufacturing equipment; the ability to acquire the ESR Building prior to the expiration of the Armco Lease; the Company’s ongoing requirement for continued compliance with environmental laws; and the ultimate outcome of the Company’s current and future litigation matters. Many of these factors are not within the Company’s control and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the Company’s actual results in future periods to be materially different from any future performance suggested herein. Any unfavorable change in the foregoing or other factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Further, the Company operates in an industry sector where securities values may be volatile and may be influenced by economic and other factors beyond the Company’s control.

2

Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Information)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of operations for the three- and six- month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, balance sheets as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, all of which were of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and the consolidated results of operations and of cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Note 2 – Common Stock

The reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding utilized for the earnings per common share computations are as follows:

The Company had 1,196 and 1,088 common stock equivalents outstanding for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003, respectively, which were not included in the common share computations for earnings (loss) per share as the common stock equivalents were anti-dilutive.

Note 3 – Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings per share between the Company’s use of the intrinsic value method and the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-based employee and director compensation (dollars, except per share amounts, in thousands):

6

Table of Contents

Note 4 – New Accounting Pronouncements

No new accounting pronouncements have been issued during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 that would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. Further, there have been no changes in the Company that would impact the accounting pronouncements disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Note 5 - Inventory

The major classes of inventory are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Note 6 - Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consists of the following (dollars in thousands):

Property, plant and equipment includes certain buildings and structures located in Bridgeville, PA that were previously leased from Armco, which merged with and into AK Steel in 1999 (“Armco”). In 2003, the Company exercised its option to purchase all of the property permitted under the capital lease with Armco for $1.

The ESR building, which houses the Company’s four electro-slag remelting furnaces and ancillary equipment in Bridgeville, was not included in the option to purchase. The Company will continue to operate the equipment in the ESR building under a lease with Armco that was extended to March 8, 2005. The Company has entered into negotiations with AK Steel to purchase the ESR building. In the event the ESR building is not purchased, or the lease is not extended beyond March 8, 2005, the relocation of the ESR equipment would have an adverse material effect on the financial condition of the Company.

In 2003, the Company entered into a $200,000 Deferred Loan Agreement maturing on December 31, 2006 with the City of Dunkirk, New York. No principal or interest payments will be required under the Deferred Loan Agreement provided the Company hires 30 new employees and more than 50% of those jobs are made available to certain Dunkirk City residents. The Company believes it will meet the conditions of the Deferred Loan Agreement. Therefore, the proceeds have been applied to reduce the acquisition cost of new equipment at the Company’s Dunkirk facility.

7

Table of Contents

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies

The Company, as well as other steel companies, is subject to demanding environmental standards imposed by federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. The Company is not aware of any environmental condition that currently exists at any of its facilities that would cause a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

In connection with the Company’s June 2, 1995 agreement with Armco to purchase certain assets and a parcel of real property located in Titusville, Armco agreed to indemnify the Company up to $3,000,000 in the aggregate for liabilities under environmental laws arising out of conditions on or under the Titusville property existing prior to June 2, 1995. Armco also agreed to indemnify the Company for any liabilities arising out of environmental conditions existing off-site as of June 2, 1995, and that indemnification is not subject to the $3,000,000 limitation.

The Company has filed no claims against Armco since the inception of the acquisition agreement. In addition, management is not aware of any financial difficulties being experienced by AK Steel, as successor to Armco, that would prevent its performance under the acquisition agreement.

In connection with the acquisition of the Dunkirk facility, Dunkirk Specialty Steel entered into an order with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“NY DEC”) that precludes NY DEC from bringing any action against the Company relating to existing environmental conditions as of February 14, 2002. There can be no assurance that any other party will not assert any claims with respect to environmental conditions at the Dunkirk facility, or that the Company will have the financial resources to discharge any liabilities if legally compelled to do so.

On June 29, 2001, suit was filed against the Company in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania by Teledyne Technologies, Incorporated (“Teledyne”). The suit alleges that steel product manufactured by the Company was defective and the Company was or should have been aware of the defects. Teledyne has alleged that the defective steel supplied by the Company caused certain crankshafts sold by Teledyne for use in aircraft engines to be defective. As a result, Teledyne is claiming damages relating to the recall, replacement and repair of aircraft engines.

In 2002, Teledyne was unsuccessful in its pursuit of a similar claim brought against another specialty steel producer who supplied the same steel product. After in-depth investigation, it is the Company’s position that the suit is without merit and it intends to vigorously defend that position. Additionally, the Company believes that it has insurance coverage that is available for this claim. At this time, the Company is engaged in discovery and believes that the final disposition of this suit will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.

On April 7, 2003, United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. (“USAU”), a New York corporation, as managers and on behalf of United States Aircraft Insurance Group (“USAIG”), the Company’s Aircraft Products Liability insurance carrier, filed suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania asking the court for a declaratory judgment as to what actual liability and obligations were applicable to USAIG relating to the insurance policy issued to the Company, and the allegations made by Teledyne. The Company and USAU reached a settlement agreement as of May 1, 2004 regarding the allocation of certain potential costs associated with the Teledyne claim and have agreed to jointly file a motion to have the declaratory suit dismissed. On July 27, 2004 the suit brought by USAU was dismissed.

The Company maintains a supply contract agreement with Talley Metals Technology, Inc. a subsidiary of Carpenter Technology Corporation (“Talley Metals”). While the initial term of the agreement expired December 31, 2002, the agreement continues to automatically renew with the placement of new orders each month and requires a 90-day notice to terminate. In addition, Talley Metals is required under the agreement to purchase a minimum of 1,000 tons of stainless reroll billet products each calendar month and average at least 1,250 tons per month during the last twelve-month period. The value of the contract on a monthly basis will depend on product mix and key raw material prices. Due to market conditions during 2003, the Company waived Talley Metals’ requirement to purchase the monthly minimum quantity of stainless reroll billets.

8

Table of Contents

Note 8 - Business Segments

The Company is comprised of two business segments: Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, which consists of the Bridgeville and Titusville facilities, and Dunkirk Specialty Steel, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary located in Dunkirk, New York. The Universal Stainless & Alloy Products manufacturing process involves melting, remelting, treating and hot and cold rolling of semi-finished and finished specialty steels. Dunkirk Specialty Steel’s manufacturing process involves hot rolling and finishing of specialty steel bar, rod and wire products. The segment data are as follows (dollars in thousands):

9

Table of Contents

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

An analysis of the Company’s operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Market Segment Information

Three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the similar period in 2003

Net sales for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 increased $12.2 million and $18.8 million, respectively, as compared to the similar periods in 2003. These increases are primarily due to increased shipments within each market segment as well as the adoption of surcharge mechanisms for additional raw material components and other price increases implemented during the first half of 2004. In addition, the 2004 financial results have benefited from greater demand of higher value-added niche products due to improved economic conditions. Shipments of aerospace, power generation, petrochemical and tool steel products for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 have increased in comparison to the same prior year periods.

Cost of products sold, as a percentage of net sales, was 84.5% and 94.7% for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and was 87.2% and 97.1% for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decreases are primarily due to increased production volumes, improved mix of products shipped and higher selling prices, partially offset by higher raw material, labor, utility and other manufacturing supply costs.

10

Table of Contents

Selling and administrative expenses increased by $422,000 and $557,000 in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004, respectively, as compared to similar periods in 2003. These increases are primarily due to higher employment costs.

Interest expense and other financing costs increased by $12,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003 and increased $5,000 in the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. The increases were primarily due to an increased use of the revolving line of credit, partially offset by the continued reduction in long-term debt outstanding.

The effective income tax rate utilized in the three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was 36.0% and 37.1%, respectively. The effective income tax rate utilized in the current period reflects the anticipated effect of the Company’s permanent tax deductions against expected income levels in 2004. The effective income tax rate for the remainder of 2004 is expected to approximate 36%.

Business Segment Results

An analysis of the net sales and operating income for the reportable segments for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products Segment

Net sales for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 for this segment, which consists of the Bridgeville and Titusville facilities, increased by $11.0 million, or 76%, in comparison to the three-month period ended June 30, 2003 and $17.4 million, or 65%, in comparison to the similar 2003 six-month period. The increase in net sales for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 in comparison to the same year-ago periods are primarily due to increased revenues associated with the sale of power generation, aerospace and commodity products. Net sales of power generation, aerospace and commodity products increased by 135%, 113% and 78%, respectively for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, and by 78%, 73% and 79%, respectively, for the six-months ended June 30, 2004.

Operating income for the Universal Stainless & Alloy Products segment increased by $2.2 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003 and increased by $3.3 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004. The increases are primarily due to increased production volumes, improved mix of products shipped and higher selling prices, partially offset by higher raw material, labor, utility and other manufacturing supply costs.

11

Table of Contents

Dunkirk Specialty Steel Segment

Net sales for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 for this segment increased by $2.6 million, or 49%, in comparison to the three-month period ended June 30, 2003 and $4.6 million, or 45%, in comparison to the similar 2003 six-month period. The increase in net sales for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 in comparison to the same year-ago periods are primarily due to increased revenues associated with the sale of aerospace, commodity and petrochemical products. Net sales of aerospace, commodity and petrochemical products increased by 64%, 26% and 44%, respectively for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004, and by 47%, 36% and 26%, respectively, for the six-months ended June 30, 2004.

Operating income increased by $1.0 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003 and increased by $1.7 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004. The increases are primarily due to increased production volumes, improved mix of products shipped and higher selling prices, partially offset by higher raw material, labor, utility and other manufacturing supply costs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has financed its operating activities through cash on hand at the beginning of the period and additional borrowings. At June 30, 2004, working capital approximated $38.0 million, as compared to $33.4 million at December 31, 2003. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities decreased from 4.2:1 at December 31, 2003 to 3.3:1 at June 30, 2004. The debt to capitalization ratio was 9.7% at June 30, 2004 and 11.3% at December 31, 2003.

Cash received from sales of $43.5 million and $30.7 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003, respectively, represent the primary source of cash from operations. An analysis of the primary uses of cash is as follows:

12

Table of Contents

Cash used to fund raw material purchases, employment costs and utilities increased during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 in comparison to the similar year-ago period primarily due to increased sales and higher transaction prices. The cost of raw materials contained within work-in-process inventory is approximately $10.0 million higher at June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003, as a result of increased raw material transaction prices and demand. The Company continuously monitors market price fluctuations of its key raw materials. The following table reflects the average market value per pound for selected months impacting raw material costs for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2004.