UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED] |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-20646
Caraustar Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
North Carolina | 58-1388387 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
3100 Joe Jerkins Blvd., Austell, Georgia | 30106 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(770) 948-3101
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date, August 6, 2004.
Common Stock, $.10 par value | 28,476,223 | |
(Class) | (Outstanding) |
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
ITEM 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share data)
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 76,253 | $ | 85,551 | ||||
Receivables, net of allowances |
110,066 | 93,892 | ||||||
Inventories |
87,770 | 87,608 | ||||||
Refundable income taxes |
192 | 250 | ||||||
Current deferred tax asset |
8,938 | 7,457 | ||||||
Other current assets |
14,364 | 12,461 | ||||||
Total current assets |
297,583 | 287,219 | ||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: |
||||||||
Land |
12,077 | 12,211 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements |
140,448 | 141,022 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
619,890 | 617,688 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
14,837 | 15,225 | ||||||
787,252 | 786,146 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(384,243 | ) | (375,374 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
403,009 | 410,772 | ||||||
GOODWILL |
183,130 | 183,130 | ||||||
INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
58,778 | 54,623 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
26,900 | 24,801 | ||||||
$ | 969,400 | $ | 960,545 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Current maturities of debt |
$ | 75 | $ | 106 | ||||
Accounts payable |
82,015 | 75,013 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
8,863 | 8,832 | ||||||
Accrued compensation |
12,746 | 9,800 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
34,383 | 31,307 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
138,082 | 125,058 | ||||||
SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY |
| | ||||||
OTHER LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities |
525,147 | 531,001 | ||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
57,129 | 58,920 | ||||||
PENSION LIABILITY |
23,241 | 18,632 | ||||||
DEFERRED COMPENSATION |
1,600 | 1,522 | ||||||
OTHER LIABILITIES |
6,961 | 5,031 | ||||||
MINORITY INTEREST |
617 | 504 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 13) |
||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.10 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.10 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 28,471,517 and 28,222,205 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively |
2,847 | 2,822 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
186,960 | 185,031 | ||||||
Unearned compensation |
(1,742 | ) | (1,865 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
47,501 | 52,531 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income: |
||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment |
(19,244 | ) | (19,244 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation |
301 | 602 | ||||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(18,943 | ) | (18,642 | ) | ||||
Total Shareholders Equity |
216,623 | 219,877 | ||||||
$ | 969,400 | $ | 960,545 | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share data)
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
SALES |
$ | 268,471 | $ | 246,843 | $ | 525,566 | $ | 499,745 | ||||||||
COST OF SALES |
225,742 | 208,697 | 446,541 | 419,546 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
42,729 | 38,146 | 79,025 | 80,199 | ||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
33,818 | 40,612 | 69,167 | 79,703 | ||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
1,631 | 1,835 | 4,673 | 6,167 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
7,280 | (4,301 | ) | 5,185 | (5,671 | ) | ||||||||||
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(10,746 | ) | (11,244 | ) | (21,603 | ) | (21,581 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
349 | 235 | 689 | 436 | ||||||||||||
Write-off of deferred debt costs |
| (1,812 | ) | | (1,812 | ) | ||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
6,382 | 1,444 | 9,064 | 1,464 | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
(288 | ) | 253 | (319 | ) | 351 | ||||||||||
(4,303 | ) | (11,124 | ) | (12,169 | ) | (21,142 | ) | |||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES |
2,977 | (15,425 | ) | (6,984 | ) | (26,813 | ) | |||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST IN LOSSES (INCOME) |
51 | (58 | ) | (113 | ) | (63 | ) | |||||||||
(PROVISION) BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES |
(1,285 | ) | 5,648 | 2,067 | 9,913 | |||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | 1,743 | $ | (9,835 | ) | $ | (5,030 | ) | $ | (16,963 | ) | |||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) GAIN: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(282 | ) | 527 | (301 | ) | 723 | ||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | 1,461 | $ | (9,308 | ) | $ | (5,331 | ) | $ | (16,240 | ) | |||||
BASIC |
||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | |||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
28,450 | 27,911 | 28,421 | 27,911 | ||||||||||||
DILUTED |
||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | |||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
28,492 | 27,911 | 28,421 | 27,911 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (5,030 | ) | $ | (16,963 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization |
14,265 | 14,924 | ||||||
Write-off of deferred debt costs |
| 1,812 | ||||||
Disposal of property, plant and equipment, net |
860 | 687 | ||||||
Restructuring costs |
1,175 | 5,670 | ||||||
Other noncash adjustments |
(2,967 | ) | (8,337 | ) | ||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates, net of distributions |
(4,064 | ) | 686 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions |
(5,255 | ) | 18,454 | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(1,016 | ) | 16,933 | |||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(8,892 | ) | (10,839 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
| (707 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment |
2,011 | 175 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
(150 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(7,031 | ) | (11,371 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Repayments of short and long-term debt |
(3,517 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from swap agreement unwinds |
380 | 15,950 | ||||||
Issuances of stock, net of forfeitures |
1,886 | | ||||||
Deferred debt costs |
| (2,003 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(1,251 | ) | 13,939 | |||||
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(9,298 | ) | 19,501 | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
85,551 | 34,314 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 76,253 | $ | 53,815 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES: |
||||||||
Cash payments for interest |
$ | 22,154 | $ | 19,978 | ||||
Income tax payments (refunds), net |
$ | 1,136 | $ | (17,373 | ) | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2004
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods. Certain notes and other information have been condensed or omitted from the interim financial statements; therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The Company reclassified certain packaging costs from selling, general and administrative expenses to cost of sales for both the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. For the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company reclassified $4.4 million and $4.6 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company reclassified $8.5 million and $9.1 million, respectively. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform with the 2004 presentation.
Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 106-2, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. FSP No. 106-2 requires employers that sponsor postretirement benefit plans that provide prescription drug benefits to retirees to account for the effect of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act) in the third quarter of 2004. The amounts included in the financial statements related to the Companys postretirement benefit plans do not reflect the effect of the Act. The Act is expected to reduce the Companys post-retirement benefit obligations, but the effect is not expected to be material.
Note 3. Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Interim pro forma information regarding net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share is required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, which requires that the information be determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of that statement. The fair values for these options were estimated as of the grant dates using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
2003 |
|||
Risk-free interest rate |
3.54% 4.22 | % | |
Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | |
Expected option lives |
8-10 years | ||
Expected volatility |
39 | % |
The total fair value of the options granted during the year ended December 31, 2003 was computed to be approximately $1.0 million. One thousand options with an approximate value of $4 thousand were granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004. If the Company had accounted for these plans in accordance with SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and included the amortization expense related to options vesting each year, the Companys reported and pro forma net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 1,743 | $ | (9,835 | ) | $ | (5,030 | ) | $ | (16,963 | ) | |||||
Stock based compensation expense determined pursuant to SFAS No. 123, net of related tax effects |
(137 | ) | (165 | ) | (837 | ) | (1,176 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 1,606 | $ | (10,000 | ) | $ | (5,867 | ) | $ | (18,139 | ) | |||||
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | |||||
Pro forma |
0.06 | (0.36 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.65 | ) |
As of June 30, 2004, the Company had unamortized compensation expense related to restricted common shares of $1.7 million. These shares were issued to key employees under the Companys 2003 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan. Based on the provisions of the plan, if the closing stock price is equal to or above $13 per share for 20 consecutive trading days after September 1, 2004, then the restriction on the common shares is released and the Company will record compensation expense for the remaining unamortized compensation. If this occurs in the third quarter of 2004, the impact on selling general and administrative expense would be approximately $1.6 million.
6
Note 4. Inventory
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market. The costs included in inventory include raw materials (recovered fiber for paperboard products and paperboard for converted products), direct and indirect labor and employee benefits, energy and fuel, depreciation, chemicals, general manufacturing overhead and various other costs of manufacturing. General and administrative costs are not included in inventory costs.
Market, with respect to all inventories, is replacement cost or net realizable value. The Company reviews inventory at least quarterly to determine the necessity of write-offs for excess, obsolete or unsaleable inventory. The Company estimates reserves for inventory obsolescence and shrinkage based on managements judgment of future realization. These reviews require management to assess customer and market demand. All inventories are valued using the first-in, first-out method.
Inventories at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, were as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 | |||||
Raw materials and supplies |
$ | 38,274 | $ | 37,294 | ||
Finished goods and work in process |
49,496 | 50,314 | ||||
Total inventory |
$ | 87,770 | $ | 87,608 | ||
Note 5. Senior Credit Facility and Other Long-Term Debt
At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, total long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Senior credit facility |
$ | | $ | | ||||
9 7/8 % senior subordinated notes |
285,000 | 285,000 | ||||||
7 3/8 % senior notes |
189,750 | 193,250 | ||||||
7 1/4 % senior notes |
29,000 | 29,000 | ||||||
Other notes payable |
9,810 | 9,895 | ||||||
Mark-to-market value of interest rate swap agreements |
(2,711 | ) | (1,145 | ) | ||||
Realized interest rate swap gains (1) |
14,373 | 15,107 | ||||||
Total debt |
525,222 | 531,107 | ||||||
Less current maturities |
(75 | ) | (106 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 525,147 | $ | 531,001 | ||||
(1) | Net of original issuance discounts and accumulated discount amortization related to the senior and senior subordinated notes. As described below under Interest Rate Swap Agreements, realized gains resulting from unwinding interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of debt and will be accreted as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. |
Senior Credit Facility
The Companys senior credit facility provides for a revolving line of credit of $75.0 million and is secured primarily by a first priority security interest in the Companys accounts receivable and inventory. The facility matures in June 2006. Borrowing availability is subject to borrowing base requirements established by eligible accounts receivable and inventory. The facility includes a subfacility of $50.0 million for letters of credit, usage of which reduces availability under the facility. As of June 30,
7
2004, no borrowings were outstanding under the facility; however, an aggregate of $41.2 million in letter of credit obligations were outstanding. Availability under the facility at June 30, 2004, was limited to $23.8 million after taking into consideration outstanding letter of credit obligations and minimum borrowing availability requirements.
Borrowings under the facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at the Companys option, either (1) the base rate (which is the prime rate most recently announced by Bank of America, N.A., the administrative agent under the facility, plus a margin of 0.50% or (2) the adjusted Eurodollar Interbank Offered Rate plus a margin of 2.50%. The undrawn portion of the facility is subject to a facility fee at an annual rate of 0.50%. Outstanding letters of credit are subject to an annual fee equal to the applicable margin for Eurodollar-based loans.
The facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, the Companys ability and its subsidiaries ability to create liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, incur indebtedness and guarantees, pay dividends, repurchase or redeem capital stock and indebtedness, make certain investments or acquisitions, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, make capital expenditures in excess of $30.0 million per year or change the nature of the Companys business. The facility also contains a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, which applies only in the event borrowing availability falls below $10.0 million or suppressed availability falls below $20.0 million. Suppressed availability is defined as the amount of eligible accounts receivable and inventory (less reserves and aggregate credit outstandings) in excess of $75.0 million or the amount of eligible inventory (less reserves and aggregate credit outstandings) in excess of $37.5 million. The fixed charge ratio covenant did not require measurement at June 30, 2004.
The facility contains events of default including, but not limited to, nonpayment of principal or interest, violation of covenants, incorrectness of representations and warranties, cross-default to other indebtedness, bankruptcy and other insolvency events, material judgments, certain ERISA events, actual or asserted invalidity of loan documentation and certain changes of control of the Company.
For information regarding the Companys former senior credit facility, which was in place during the first quarter of 2003 and was replaced June 24, 2003, see the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Senior and Senior Subordinated Notes
On June 1, 1999, the Company issued $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7 3/8% senior notes due June 1, 2009. The 7 3/8% senior notes were issued at a discount to yield an effective interest rate of 7.47% and pay interest semiannually. After taking into account realized gains from unwinding various interest rate swap agreements, the current effective interest rate of the 7 3/8% senior notes is 6.4%. The 7 3/8% senior notes are unsecured obligations of the Company. The Company has purchased an aggregate of $10.3 million of these notes in the open market, including $3.5 million purchased in February 2004.
On March 29, 2001, the Company issued $285.0 million of 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes due April 1, 2011 and $29.0 million of 7 1/4% senior notes due May 1, 2010. These senior subordinated notes and senior notes were issued at a discount to yield effective interest rates of 10.5% and 9.4%, respectively. After taking into account realized gains from unwinding various interest rate swap agreements, the current effective interest rate of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes is 9.2%. These publicly traded senior subordinated and senior notes are unsecured, but are guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of the Companys domestic subsidiaries, other than one that is not wholly-owned.
See Note 14 Subsequent Event regarding the Companys purchase of $10.0 million of its 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes in the open market.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
In January 2003, the Company effectively unwound $85.0 million of its $135.0 million interest rate swap agreement related to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes by assigning the Companys rights and obligations under the swap to one of the Companys lenders under the senior credit facility. In exchange, the Company received approximately $4.3 million. The $4.3 million gain, which was classified as a component of debt, will be accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense. The $4.3 million gain lowered the effective interest rate of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes by approximately 30 basis points.
In May 2003, the Company unwound the remaining $50.0 million of its interest rate swap agreement related to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes, and received approximately $4.6 million from the bank counter-party. Simultaneously, the Company unwound $50.0 million of its remaining interest rate swap agreement related to the 7 3/8% senior notes, and received approximately $7.1 million. The $11.7 million gain, which was classified as a component of debt, will be accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense. The $4.6 million gain lowered the effective interest rate of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes by approximately 30 basis points. The $7.1 million gain lowered the effective interest rate of the 7 3/8% senior notes by approximately 80 basis points.
8
In July 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement, which had payment and expiration dates that corresponded to the terms of the note obligations it covered, effectively converted $50.0 million of the Companys fixed rate 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates were based on six-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
In December 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement, which has payment and expiration dates that correspond to the terms of the note obligations it covers, effectively converted $50.0 million of the Companys fixed rate 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates are based on six-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
In March 2004, the Company unwound the July 2003 $50.0 million interest rate swap agreement related to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes and received approximately $380 thousand from the bank counter-party. The $380 thousand gain, which is classified as a component of debt, will be accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense.
In April 2004, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement, which has payment and expiration dates that correspond to the terms of the note obligations it covers, effectively converted $50.0 million of the Companys fixed rate 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates are based on six-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended, the Company has designated and accounted for its interest rate swap agreements as fair value hedges. The Company has assumed no ineffectiveness with regard to these agreements as they qualified for the short-cut method of accounting for fair value hedges of debt obligations, as prescribed by SFAS No. 133. The June 30, 2004 aggregate estimated liability of the swaps was $2.7 million and is classified as a component of other long-term liabilities, with a corresponding adjustment to long-term debt in the accompanying balance sheet. The December 31, 2003 aggregate estimated liability related to the swaps was $1.1 million and is classified as a component of other long-term liabilities, with a corresponding adjustment to long-term debt in the accompanying balance sheet.
Note 6. Segment Information
The Company operates principally in three business segments organized by products. The paperboard segment consists of facilities that manufacture 100% recycled uncoated and clay-coated paperboard and facilities that collect recycled paper and broker recycled paper and other paper rolls. The tube, core, and composite container segment is principally made up of facilities that produce spiral and convolute-wound tubes, cores, and composite cans. The carton and custom packaging segment consists of facilities that produce printed and unprinted folding cartons and set-up boxes and facilities that provide contract manufacturing and contract packaging services. Intersegment sales are recorded at prices which approximate market prices.
Operating results include all costs and expenses directly related to the segment involved. Corporate expenses include corporate, general, administrative and unallocated information systems expenses.
9
The following table presents certain business segment information for the periods indicated (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Sales (external customers): |
||||||||||||||||
Paperboard |
$ | 93,447 | $ | 79,686 | $ | 181,306 | $ | 163,589 | ||||||||
Tube, core, and composite container |
99,139 | 95,581 | 193,362 | 190,539 | ||||||||||||
Carton and custom packaging |
75,885 | 71,576 | 150,898 | 145,617 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 268,471 | $ | 246,843 | $ | 525,566 | $ | 499,745 | ||||||||
Sales (intersegment): |
||||||||||||||||
Paperboard |
$ | 46,298 | $ | 43,799 | $ | 90,437 | $ | 88,162 | ||||||||
Tube, core, and composite container |
236 | 1,082 | 2,389 | 2,564 | ||||||||||||
Carton and custom packaging |
145 | 232 | 536 | 566 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 46,679 | $ | 45,113 | $ | 93,362 | $ | 91,292 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Paperboard (A) |
$ | 7,231 | $ | 4,715 | $ | 12,051 | $ | 6,595 | ||||||||
Tube, core, and composite container |
4,547 | 2,606 | 7,826 | 4,940 | ||||||||||||
Carton and custom packaging (B) |
473 | (6,193 | ) | (4,063 | ) | (6,274 | ) | |||||||||
12,251 | 1,128 | 15,814 | 5,261 | |||||||||||||
Corporate expense (C) |
(4,971 | ) | (5,429 | ) | (10,629 | ) | (10,932 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
7,280 | (4,301 | ) | 5,185 | (5,671 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
(10,746 | ) | (11,244 | ) | (21,603 | ) | (21,581 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
349 | 235 | 689 | 436 | ||||||||||||
Write-off of deferred debt costs |
| (1,812 | ) | | (1,812 | ) | ||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
6,382 | 1,444 | 9,064 | 1,464 | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
(288 | ) | 253 | (319 | ) | 351 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before minority interest and income taxes |
$ | 2,977 | $ | (15,425 | ) | $ | (6,984 | ) | $ | (26,813 | ) | |||||
(A) | The three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 results include charges to operations of $476 thousand and $272 thousand, respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. The six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 results include charges to operations of $1.8 million and $4.6 million respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. These costs relate to closing and consolidating operations within the paperboard segment (see Note 8). |
(B) | The three-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 results include charges to operations of $364 thousand and $1.6 million, respectively for restructuring and impairment costs. The six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 results include charges to operations of $1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively, for restructuring and impairment costs. These costs relate to closing and consolidating operations within the carton and custom packaging segment (see Note 8). |
(C) | The three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 results include charges to operations of $791 thousand and $1.6 million respectively, for centralizing the accounting and finance operations (see Note 8). |
Note 7. Goodwill and Other Intangible Asset
Goodwill
The Company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets pursuant to SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under this pronouncement the Company performs an impairment test at least annually. The Companys most recent impairment test was performed during the fourth quarter of 2003 and did not result in an impairment charge. There were no changes in goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Intangible Asset
As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company had an intangible asset of $7.5 million, net of $1.2 million of accumulated amortization, and $7.8 million, net of $858 thousand of accumulated amortization, respectively, which is classified with other assets. Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was $284 thousand. The intangible asset is associated with the acquisition of certain assets of the Smurfit Industrial Packaging Group, a business unit of Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, which was completed in 2002, and is attributable to the acquired customer relationships. This intangible asset is being amortized over 15 years. Scheduled amortization of the intangible asset for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):
2004 |
$ | 568 | |
2005 |
568 | ||
2006 |
568 | ||
2007 |
568 | ||
2008 |
568 | ||
Five year total |
$ | 2,840 | |
10
Note 8. Restructuring and Impairment Costs
In March 2003, the Company announced the permanent closure of its Buffalo Paperboard mill located in Lockport, New York. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $4.3 million in connection with this closure. The $4.3 million charge included a $3.1 million impairment charge for assets, a $670 thousand accrual for severance and other termination benefits, and a $607 thousand accrual for other exit costs. At December 31, 2003, a $3 thousand liability remained for other exit costs. During the first six months of 2004, the remaining accrued other exit costs were paid and an additional $23 thousand was paid and expensed for other exit costs. The exit plan for Buffalo was completed in May 2004, when the Company sold the property.
In June 2003, the Company initiated a plan to permanently close its Ashland, Ohio carton facility. The Company downsized this facility in December 2002; however, due to severe margin pressure and excess industry capacity, the Company decided to close the facility. During 2003, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $6.7 million, which included a $4.1 million impairment charge for assets, a $1.2 million accrual for severance and other termination benefits and an accrual of $1.4 million for other exit costs. At December 31, 2003, an accrual of $302 thousand for severance and other termination benefits remained and an accrual of $43 thousand remained for other exit costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company recorded an additional $429 thousand impairment charge for assets and an additional $859 thousand for other exit costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company paid $221 thousand related to severance and other termination benefits and $859 thousand for other exit costs, leaving accruals of $81 thousand and $43 thousand for severance and other termination benefits and other exit costs, respectively. Substantially all of the Ashland carton sales were transferred to the Companys other carton manufacturing facilities. As of June 30, 2004, the exit plan was substantially complete except for the sale of property, which the Company is currently marketing.
In January 2004, the Company announced the permanent closure of the Cedartown paperboard mill located in Cedartown, Georgia. The Company recorded a charge of approximately $1.0 million in connection with this closure. The initial $1.0 million charge included a $500 thousand impairment charge for assets, a $188 thousand charge for severance and other termination benefits and a $339 thousand charge for other exit costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company recorded an additional $220 thousand related to other exit costs. All of these costs were paid during the six-month period ending June 30, 2004 and no accrual remained as of June 30, 2004. As of June 30, 2004, there were no employees remaining at the mill. Substantially all of Cedartowns paperboard production was transferred to the Companys other paperboard mills. As of June 30, 2004, the exit plan for Cedartown was complete except for the sale of the property, which the Company is currently marketing.
In January 2004, the Company initiated a plan to centralize the accounting and finance operations to the Companys headquarters located in Austell, Georgia. This action was initiated to enhance the accounting control environment and reduce costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $1.4 million for other exit costs related to consulting fees and relocation expenses and $213 thousand for severance and other termination benefits in connection with this plan. Severance and other termination benefit costs of $66 thousand were paid and all other exits costs were paid during the period and a $147 thousand accrual remained related to severance and other termination benefits as of June 30, 2004. The Company expects to incur an additional $250 thousand in restructuring charges in the third quarter of 2004 and will complete this centralization plan during the fourth quarter of 2004.
In June 2004, the Company announced the closure of its Charlotte, North Carolina carton plant and its Georgetown, Kentucky plastics plant. The closure of these two facilities is part of the previously announced initiatives to right-size operations to better utilize capacity and achieve greater cost efficiencies. As of June 30, 2004, no costs had been recorded in connection with these closures. The Company expects to incur total restructuring costs of approximately $3.2 million in the third and fourth quarter of 2004, for severance and other termination benefits, other exit costs and accelerated depreciation for assets that will be disposed of when production ends. Customers of these facilities will be served by the Companys other carton and plastics operations.
During 2001 and 2002, the Company initiated restructuring activities to consolidate its Carolina Converting Inc. operation with its Carolina Components operation, to close the Chicago paperboard mill, and to close the Halifax paperboard mill. At December 31, 2003, a $4.2 million accrual remained for other exit costs related to these activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company incurred an additional $246 thousand charge for impairment of assets and an additional $278
11
thousand for other exit costs related to these restructuring activities. The Company paid $1.1 million in other exit costs during this period, leaving an accrual of $3.3 million at June 30, 2004. All of these restructuring activities are substantially complete except for selling the real estate or fulfilling the Companys obligation under a real estate lease.
The following is a summary of restructuring and impairment costs and the restructuring liability from December 31, 2003 to June 30, 2004 (in thousands):
Asset Impairment Charge |
Severance and Costs |
Other Exit Costs |
Restructuring Liability Total |
Total Charges(1) | ||||||||||||||
Liability balance, December 31, 2003 |
$ | 302 | $ | 4,230 | $ | 4,532 | ||||||||||||
First quarter 2004 costs |
$ | 1,175 | 188 | 1,679 | 1,867 | $ | 3,042 | |||||||||||
Expenditures |
(330 | ) | (2,255 | ) | (2,585 | ) | ||||||||||||
Liability balance, March 31, 2004 |
160 | 3,654 | 3,814 | |||||||||||||||
Second quarter 2004 costs |
$ | | 213 | 1,418 | 1,631 | $ | 1,631 | |||||||||||
Expenditures |
(145 | ) | (1,685 | ) | (1,830 | ) | ||||||||||||
Liability balance, June 30, 2004 |
$ | 228 | $ | 3,387 | $ | 3,615 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Asset impairment charge, severance and other termination benefit costs and other exit costs are aggregated and reported as restructuring and impairment costs on the statement of operations. |
For restructuring plans initiated during 2003 and 2004, the paperboard segment recorded $1.3 million of restructuring and impairment costs during the six months ended June 30, 2004. The paperboard segment has recorded $6.3 million cumulatively related to these plans and expects to record an additional $117 thousand in restructuring and impairment costs to complete the plans. The carton and custom packaging segment recorded $1.3 million of restructuring and impairment costs during the six months ended June 30, 2004. The carton and custom packaging segment has recorded $8.0 million cumulatively related to these plans and expects to record an additional $1.2 million in restructuring and impairment costs to complete the plans.
Note 9. Pension Plan and Other Postretirement Benefits
Pension Plan and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Substantially all of the Companys employees participate in a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the Pension Plan). The Pension Plan calls for benefits to be paid to all eligible employees at retirement based primarily on years of service with the Company and compensation rates in effect near retirement. The Pension Plans assets consist of shares held in collective investment funds and group annuity contracts. The Companys policy is to fund benefits attributed to employees service to date as well as service expected to be earned in the future. Based on estimates at December 31, 2003 no contributions will be required for the year ended December 31, 2004.
During 1996, the Company adopted a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP), which provides benefits to participants based on average compensation. The SERP covers certain executives of the Company commencing upon retirement. The SERP is unfunded at June 30, 2004.
Pension expense for the Pension Plan and the SERP includes the following components for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Service cost of benefits earned |
$ | 1,483 | $ | 1,317 | $ | 2,966 | $ | 2,633 | ||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
1,509 | 1,400 | 3,017 | 2,800 | ||||||||||||
Estimated 2004 and actual 2003 return on plan assets |
(1,595 | ) | (3,399 | ) | (3,190 | ) | (6,797 | ) | ||||||||
Net amortization and deferral |
881 | 3,180 | 1,762 | 6,359 | ||||||||||||
Net pension expense |
$ | 2,278 | $ | 2,498 | $ | 4,555 | $ | 4,995 | ||||||||
12
Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company provides postretirement medical benefits to retired employees of certain of its subsidiaries. The Company accounts for these postretirement medical benefits in accordance with SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions.
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 included the following components (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
Service cost of benefits earned |
$ | 5 | $ | 20 | $ | 9 | $ | 40 | ||||||
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |
83 | 101 | 166 | 202 | ||||||||||
Amortization |
70 | (73 | ) | 141 | (145 | ) | ||||||||
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost |
$ | 158 | $ | 48 | $ | 316 | $ | 97 | ||||||
Note 10. Income (Loss) Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income (loss) per share computations for net income (loss) (in thousands, except per share information):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,743 | $ | (9,835 | ) | $ | (5,030 | ) | $ | (16,963 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic |
28,450 | 27,911 | 28,421 | 27,911 | |||||||||||
Common share equivalents |
42 | | | | |||||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted |
28,492 | 27,911 | 28,421 | 27,911 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) per share - basic |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) per share - diluted |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.35 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||
Approximately 1.0 million stock options are excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average shares for the three months ended June 30, 2004. These options are excluded because they are antidilutive. Since the three months ended June 30, 2003 and the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were net losses, the impact of the dilutive effect of stock options, if any, were not added to the weighted average shares.
13
Note 11. Equity Interest in Unconsolidated Affiliate
The Company owns 50% of Standard Gypsum, L.P. (Standard). Standard is a joint venture, accounted for under the equity method, that operates two gypsum wallboard manufacturing facilities. One facility is located in McQueeney, Texas and the other is in Cumberland City, Tennessee. The joint venture is managed by Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation, which is the owner of the remaining 50% interest in the joint venture. Because of the significance of Standards operating results to the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the three-month and six-month periods ending June 30, 2004, Standards summarized balance sheet and income statement are presented below (in thousands):
July 3, 2004 |
January 3, 2004 | |||||
Current assets |
$ | 30,443 | $ | 15,834 | ||
Noncurrent assets |
62,808 | 64,189 | ||||
Current liabilities |
9,983 | 7,394 | ||||
Long-term debt |
56,200 | 56,200 | ||||
Long-term liabilities |
| 7 | ||||
Net assets |
27,068 | 16,422 |
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||
Sales |
$ | 44,432 | $ | 25,267 | $ | 77,434 | $ | 51,550 | ||||
Gross profit |
13,044 | 4,090 | 21,196 | 6,981 | ||||||||
Income from operations |
11,836 | 3,323 | 19,004 | 5,437 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 11,112 | $ | 2,682 | $ | 18,042 | $ | 4,244 |
Note 12. Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
These condensed consolidating financial statements reflect Caraustar Industries, Inc. and its Subsidiary Guarantors, which consist of all of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries other than foreign subsidiaries and one domestic subsidiary that is not wholly-owned. These nonguarantor subsidiaries are herein referred to as Nonguarantor Subsidiaries. Separate financial statements of the Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented because the subsidiary guarantees are joint and several and full and unconditional and the Company believes that the condensed consolidating financial statements presented are more meaningful in understanding the financial position of the Subsidiary Guarantors.
14
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
As of June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 75,743 | $ | 125 | $ | 385 | $ | | $ | 76,253 | ||||||||||
Intercompany funding |
(21,911 | ) | 32,024 | (10,113 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Receivables, net of allowances |
| 104,728 | 5,338 | | 110,066 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany accounts receivable |
| 129 | 80 | (209 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 84,600 | 3,170 | | 87,770 | |||||||||||||||
Refundable income taxes |
192 | | | | 192 | |||||||||||||||
Current deferred tax asset |
8,938 | | | | 8,938 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
5,956 | 7,749 | 659 | | 14,364 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
68,918 | 229,355 | (481 | ) | (209 | ) | 297,583 | |||||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
12,725 | 752,855 | 21,672 | | 787,252 | |||||||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(8,420 | ) | (366,328 | ) | (9,495 | ) | | (384,243 | ) | |||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
4,305 | 386,527 | 12,177 | | 403,009 | |||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT IN CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES |
572,865 | 131,669 | | (704,534 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
GOODWILL |
| 179,628 | 3,502 | | 183,130 | |||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
58,778 | | | | 58,778 | |||||||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
17,730 | 9,163 | 7 | | 26,900 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 722,596 | $ | 936,342 | $ | 15,205 | $ | (704,743 | ) | $ | 969,400 | ||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of debt |
$ | 75 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 75 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable |
17,439 | 60,930 | 3,646 | | 82,015 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany accounts payable |
| 80 | 129 | (209 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accrued interest |
8,793 | 70 | | | 8,863 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued compensation |
1,117 | 11,284 | 345 | | 12,746 | |||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
6,334 | 26,408 | 1,641 | | 34,383 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
33,758 | 98,772 | 5,761 | (209 | ) | 138,082 | ||||||||||||||
SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
OTHER LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities |
516,947 | 8,200 | | | 525,147 | |||||||||||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
43,444 | 12,240 | 1,445 | | 57,129 | |||||||||||||||
PENSION LIABILITY |
23,241 | | | | 23,241 | |||||||||||||||
DEFERRED COMPENSATION |
1,547 | 53 | | | 1,600 | |||||||||||||||
OTHER LIABILITIES |
2,761 | 4,000 | 200 | | 6,961 | |||||||||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST |
| | | 617 | 617 | |||||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
2,733 | 772 | 523 | (1,181 | ) | 2,847 | ||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
192,112 | 671,229 | 9,167 | (685,548 | ) | 186,960 | ||||||||||||||
Unearned compensation |
(1,742 | ) | | | | (1,742 | ) | |||||||||||||
Retained (deficit) earnings |
(72,961 | ) | 141,076 | (2,192 | ) | (18,422 | ) | 47,501 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment |
(19,244 | ) | | | | (19,244 | ) | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
| | 301 | | 301 | |||||||||||||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
(19,244 | ) | | 301 | | (18,943 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
100,898 | 813,077 | 7,799 | (705,151 | ) | 216,623 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 722,596 | $ | 936,342 | $ | 15,205 | $ | (704,743 | ) | $ | 969,400 | ||||||||||
15
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
As of December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 84,303 | $ | | $ | 1,248 | $ | | $ | 85,551 | ||||||||||
Intercompany funding |
1,628 | 9,149 | (10,777 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Receivables, net of allowances |
| 88,937 | 4,955 | | 93,892 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany accounts receivable |
| 77 | 212 | (289 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 83,941 | 3,667 | | 87,608 | |||||||||||||||
Refundable income taxes |
250 | | | | 250 | |||||||||||||||
Current deferred tax asset |
7,457 | | | | 7,457 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
3,942 | 8,034 | 485 | | 12,461 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
97,580 | 190,138 | (210 | ) | (289 | ) | 287,219 | |||||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
12,101 | 752,601 | 21,444 | | 786,146 | |||||||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(7,601 | ) | (358,851 | ) | (8,922 | ) | | (375,374 | ) | |||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
4,500 | 393,750 | 12,522 | | 410,772 | |||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT IN CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES |
572,865 | 131,162 | | (704,027 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
GOODWILL |
| 179,628 | 3,502 | | 183,130 | |||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
54,623 | | | | 54,623 | |||||||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
14,429 | 10,332 | 40 | | 24,801 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 743,997 | $ | 905,010 | $ | 15,854 | $ | (704,316 | ) | $ | 960,545 | ||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of debt |
$ | 75 | $ | 31 | $ | | $ | | $ | 106 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable |
15,820 | 54,890 | 4,303 | | 75,013 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany accounts payable |
| 212 | 77 | (289 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accrued interest |
8,758 | 74 | | | 8,832 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued compensation |
738 | 8,870 | 192 | | 9,800 | |||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
10,551 | 19,756 | 1,000 | | 31,307 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
35,942 | 83,833 | 5,572 | (289 | ) | 125,058 | ||||||||||||||
SENIOR CREDIT FACILITY |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
OTHER LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities |
522,747 | 8,254 | | | 531,001 | |||||||||||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
45,229 | 12,242 | 1,449 | | 58,920 | |||||||||||||||
PENSION LIABILITY |
18,632 | | | | 18,632 | |||||||||||||||
DEFERRED COMPENSATION |
1,469 | 53 | | | 1,522 | |||||||||||||||
OTHER LIABILITIES |
1,222 | 3,809 | | | 5,031 | |||||||||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST |
| | | 504 | 504 | |||||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
2,708 | 772 | 523 | (1,181 | ) | 2,822 | ||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
189,676 | 671,229 | 9,167 | (685,041 | ) | 185,031 | ||||||||||||||
Unearned compensation |
(1,865 | ) | | | | (1,865 | ) | |||||||||||||
Retained (deficit) earnings |
(52,519 | ) | 124,818 | (1,459 | ) | (18,309 | ) | 52,531 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment |
(19,244 | ) | | | | (19,244 | ) | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
| | 602 | | 602 | |||||||||||||||
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
(19,244 | ) | | 602 | | (18,642 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
118,756 | 796,819 | 8,833 | (704,531 | ) | 219,877 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 743,997 | $ | 905,010 | $ | 15,854 | $ | (704,316 | ) | $ | 960,545 | ||||||||||
16
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
SALES |
$ | | $ | 327,364 | $ | 9,889 | $ | (68,782 | ) | $ | 268,471 | |||||||||
COST OF SALES |
| 285,847 | 8,677 | (68,782 | ) | 225,742 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 41,517 | 1,212 | | 42,729 | |||||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
4,119 | 28,142 | 1,557 | | 33,818 | |||||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
791 | 840 | | | 1,631 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(4,910 | ) | 12,535 | (345 | ) | | 7,280 | |||||||||||||
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(10,665 | ) | (79 | ) | (101 | ) | 99 | (10,746 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest income |
448 | | | (99 | ) | 349 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
6,382 | | | | 6,382 | |||||||||||||||
Other, net |
(349 | ) | 117 | (56 | ) | | (288 | ) | ||||||||||||
(4,184 | ) | 38 | (157 | ) | | (4,303 | ) | |||||||||||||
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES |
(9,094 | ) | 12,573 | (502 | ) | | 2,977 | |||||||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST IN LOSSES |
| | | 51 | 51 | |||||||||||||||
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
(1,285 | ) | | | | (1,285 | ) | |||||||||||||
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
$ | (10,379 | ) | $ | 12,573 | $ | (502 | ) | $ | 51 | $ | 1,743 | ||||||||
17
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
SALES |
$ | | $ | 289,504 | $ | 9,972 | $ | (52,633 | ) | $ | 246,843 | |||||||||
COST OF SALES |
| 252,915 | 8,415 | (52,633 | ) | 208,697 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 36,589 | 1,557 | | 38,146 | |||||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
5,568 | 32,846 | 2,198 | | 40,612 | |||||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
| 1,835 | | | 1,835 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(5,568 | ) | 1,908 | (641 | ) | | (4,301 | ) | ||||||||||||
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(11,158 | ) | (84 | ) | (110 | ) | 108 | (11,244 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest income |
341 | 1 | 1 | (108 | ) | 235 | ||||||||||||||
Write-off of deferred debt costs |
(1,812 | ) | | | | (1,812 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
1,444 | | | | 1,444 | |||||||||||||||
Other, net |
| 422 | (169 | ) | | 253 | ||||||||||||||
(11,185 | ) | 339 | (278 | ) | | (11,124 | ) | |||||||||||||
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES |
(16,753 | ) | 2,247 | (919 | ) | | (15,425 | ) | ||||||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME |
| | | (58 | ) | (58 | ) | |||||||||||||
BENEFIT (PROVISION) FOR INCOME TAXES |
5,716 | | (68 | ) | | 5,648 | ||||||||||||||
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
$ | (11,037 | ) | $ | 2,247 | $ | (987 | ) | $ | (58 | ) | $ | (9,835 | ) | ||||||
18
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
SALES |
$ | | $ | 641,154 | $ | 19,457 | $ | (135,045 | ) | $ | 525,566 | |||||||||
COST OF SALES |
| 564,521 | 17,065 | (135,045 | ) | 446,541 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 76,633 | 2,392 | | 79,025 | |||||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
9,034 | 57,301 | 2,832 | | 69,167 | |||||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
1,591 | 3,082 | | | 4,673 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(10,625 | ) | 16,250 | (440 | ) | | 5,185 | |||||||||||||
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(21,441 | ) | (160 | ) | (202 | ) | 200 | (21,603 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest income |
889 | | | (200 | ) | 689 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
9,064 | | | | 9,064 | |||||||||||||||
Other, net |
(396 | ) | 168 | (91 | ) | | (319 | ) | ||||||||||||
(11,884 | ) | 8 | (293 | ) | | (12,169 | ) | |||||||||||||
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES |
(22,509 | ) | 16,258 | (733 | ) | | (6,984 | ) | ||||||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME |
| | | (113 | ) | (113 | ) | |||||||||||||
BENEFIT FOR INCOME TAXES |
2,067 | | | | 2,067 | |||||||||||||||
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
$ | (20,442 | ) | $ | 16,258 | $ | (733 | ) | $ | (113 | ) | $ | (5,030 | ) | ||||||
19
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||
SALES |
$ | | $ | 587,740 | $ | 19,227 | $ | (107,222 | ) | $ | 499,745 | |||||||||
COST OF SALES |
| 510,935 | 15,833 | (107,222 | ) | 419,546 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 76,805 | 3,394 | | 80,199 | |||||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
11,205 | 64,404 | 4,094 | | 79,703 | |||||||||||||||
RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT COSTS |
| 6,167 | | | 6,167 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(11,205 | ) | 6,234 | (700 | ) | | (5,671 | ) | ||||||||||||
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(21,415 | ) | (160 | ) | (214 | ) | 208 | (21,581 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest income |
642 | 1 | 1 | (208 | ) | 436 | ||||||||||||||
Write-off of deferred debt costs |
(1,812 | ) | | | | (1,812 | ) | |||||||||||||
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
1,464 | | | | 1,464 | |||||||||||||||
Other, net |
| 473 | (122 | ) | | 351 | ||||||||||||||
(21,121 | ) | 314 | (335 | ) | | (21,142 | ) | |||||||||||||
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES |
(32,326 | ) | 6,548 | (1,035 | ) | | (26,813 | ) | ||||||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME |
| | | (63 | ) | (63 | ) | |||||||||||||
BENEFIT (PROVISION) FOR INCOME TAXES |
9,981 | | (68 | ) | | 9,913 | ||||||||||||||
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
$ | (22,345 | ) | $ | 6,548 | $ | (1,103 | ) | $ | (63 | ) | $ | (16,963 | ) | ||||||
20
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
$ | (6,551 | ) | $ | 5,948 | $ | (413 | ) | $ | | $ | (1,016 | ) | ||||||
Investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(625 | ) | (7,768 | ) | (499 | ) | | (8,892 | ) | ||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates |
(150 | ) | | | | (150 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment |
| 1,962 | 49 | | 2,011 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(775 | ) | (5,806 | ) | (450 | ) | | (7,031 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of short and long-term debt |
(3,500 | ) | (17 | ) | | | (3,517 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from swap agreement unwind |
380 | | | | 380 | ||||||||||||||
Issuances of stock, net of forfeitures |
1,886 | | | | 1,886 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(1,234 | ) | (17 | ) | | | (1,251 | ) | |||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(8,560 | ) | 125 | (863 | ) | | (9,298 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
84,303 | | 1,248 | | 85,551 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 75,743 | $ | 125 | $ | 385 | $ | | $ | 76,253 | |||||||||
21
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Parent |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Nonguarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 5,687 | $ | 10,095 | $ | 1,151 | $ | | $ | 16,933 | |||||||||
Investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(559 | ) | (9,555 | ) | (725 | ) | | (10,839 | ) | ||||||||||
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired |
| (707 | ) | | | (707 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment |
| 175 | | | 175 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(559 | ) | (10,087 | ) | (725 | ) | | (11,371 | ) | ||||||||||
Financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of short and long-term debt |
| (8 | ) | | | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from swap agreement unwinds |
15,950 | | | | 15,950 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred debt costs |
(2,003 | ) | | | | (2,003 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
13,947 | (8 | ) | | | 13,939 | |||||||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
19,075 | | 426 | | 19,501 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
33,544 | | 770 | | 34,314 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 52,619 | $ | | $ | 1,196 | $ | | $ | 53,815 | |||||||||
22
Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved in certain litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Note 14. Subsequent Event
In July 2004, the Company purchased $10.0 million of its 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes in the open market for $10.4 million. This purchase reduced the Companys total long-term debt. In addition to the $10.0 million purchased in July 2004, the Companys Board of Directors authorized purchases of up to $20.0 million of the Companys senior or senior subordinated notes as market conditions warrant. However, these purchases may be limited by compliance with certain debt obligation agreements.
23
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is managements discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our financial condition and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
General
We are a major manufacturer of recycled paperboard and converted paperboard products. We operate in three business segments. The paperboard segment manufactures 100% recycled uncoated and clay-coated paperboard and collects recycled paper and brokers recycled paper and other paper rolls. The tube, core and composite container segment produces spiral and convolute-wound tubes, cores and cans. The carton and custom packaging segment produces printed and unprinted folding carton and set-up boxes and provides contract manufacturing and packaging services.
Our business is vertically integrated to a large extent. This means that our converting operations consume a large portion of our own paperboard production, approximately 42.3% in the first six months of 2004. The remaining 57.7% of our paperboard production is sold to external customers in any of four recycled paperboard end-use markets: tube, core and composite containers; folding cartons; gypsum wallboard facing paper and other specialty products. These integration statistics do not include volume produced or converted by our 50% owned, unconsolidated, joint ventures Premier Boxboard Limited and Standard Gypsum, LLP. As part of our strategy to optimize our operating efficiency, each of our mills can produce recycled paperboard for more than one end-use market. This allows us to shift production among mills in response to customer or market demands.
Historically, we have grown our business, revenues and production capacity to a significant degree through acquisitions. Based on the difficult operating climate for our industry and our financial position over the last three years, the pace of our acquisition activity, and correspondingly, our revenue growth, has slowed as we have focused on conserving cash and maximizing the productivity of our existing facilities.
We are a holding company that operates our business through 25 subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004. We also own a 50% interest in two joint ventures with Temple-Inland, Inc. We account for these interests in our joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below.
Key Business Indicator and Trends
Our industry has historically been closely correlated with the domestic economy in general, and with consumer nondurable consumption (packaging segment) and industrial production (tube, core and composite containers segment), specifically. These demand drivers tend to be cyclical in nature, with cycles lasting 3 5 years depending on such factors as gross domestic production (GDP), interest rates and other factors. As these demand drivers fluctuate, we typically experience decreases in volume and revenue in our business. Since late 1999, the recycled paperboard and converted paperboard products industry has been in a down cycle. While we believe that future operating results may improve we cannot ascertain when or to what extent this may occur.
The key operating indicator of our business is paperboard mill capacity utilization. Capacity utilization is calculated as the ratio of days operated versus available days at expected production rates, taking into consideration planned downtime for maintenance. As paperboard mill capacity utilization increases, cost per ton of paperboard generally decreases. As these tons are sold, profitability increases since fixed production costs are absorbed by more tons produced. Additionally, higher capacity utilization rates generally provide enhanced opportunity to recover material and labor increases through improved pricing. This positively affects paperboard and converted products income from operations and cash flow. Paperboard mill capacity utilization is affected by demand and by mill closures. Industry demand decreased from 2000 2002 due primarily to a recessionary general economy, the continued migration of U.S. manufacturing offshore to lower labor cost environments and product substitution, e.g. plastic standup pouches used for packaging instead of boxes. The decrease in demand resulted in a decrease in capacity utilization. We expect the migration of U.S. manufacturing offshore and product substitution to continue although at a slower rate, which could continue to negatively affect operating income and cash flow. We further expect these trends to be somewhat offset by the improving domestic economy and our own paperboard mill capacity reductions. Recent industry improvement in capacity utilization has been driven by paperboard mill closures, as over 1.7 million tons of capacity, or approximately 20% of the recycled paperboard mill total capacity, has been closed since 2000. We have closed or idled approximately 323 thousand tons of our own paperboard mill capacity during this period to better match our supply capabilities to demand.
MILL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Caraustars utilization rates exclude closed or idled machines
Industry source: American Forest and Paper Association.
Restructuring has been a primary component of managements strategy to address the decrease in demand resulting from secular trends, as discussed above, and generally weak domestic economic conditions. Between 2001 and June 30, 2004, restructuring charges have totaled $39.6 million, of which approximately $22.2 million have been noncash charges. We have also experienced increases in near-term manufacturing and selling, general and administrative costs as a result of our transitioning of business within our mill and converting systems to other company facilities. Our strategic initiatives are designed to enhance our competitiveness through reduced costs, increase revenue through delivery of differentiated quality products and services to our customers, and promote compliance with recent changes in legal and regulatory requirements. Our restructuring efforts have been directed toward reducing costs through manufacturing and converting facilities rationalization where we believed it was advantageous to do so due to geographic overlap, duplicative capabilities, changes in customer base and other factors. Rationalization of facilities typically results in increased cash outlays and expenses initially, for example, severance costs. Under current market conditions, we expect that restructuring charges will continue to decline and we believe that future earnings and cash flows will be favorably impacted by our efforts to reconfigure our business to increase efficiency and better match supply with customer demand.
Recovered fiber, which is derived from recycled paper stock, is our most significant raw material. During the past five years, the cost of recovered fiber has fluctuated significantly due to market and industry conditions. For example, our average recovered fiber cost per ton of paperboard produced increased $26 per ton or 33% from 1999 to 2000, decreased $39 per ton or 38% from 2000 to 2001, and then increased again $20 per ton or 31% from 2001 to 2002. Recovered fiber cost per ton averaged $88 during 2003 and averaged $105 during the first six months of 2004, a 19% increase over 2003.
Excluding raw materials and labor, energy is our most significant manufacturing cost. Energy consists of electrical purchases and fuel used to generate steam used in the paper making process and to operate our paperboard machines and all of our converting machinery. In 2003 energy costs averaged $61 per ton. During the first six months of 2004, energy costs were $56 per ton compared with $63 per ton in the first six months of 2003, an 11.4% decrease. The decrease was primarily due to higher operating rates combined with a decrease in natural gas costs and an increased usage of lower cost energy sources, primarily fuel oil. Until the last few years, our business had not been significantly affected by energy cost increases, and we historically have not passed increases in energy costs through to our customers. Consequently, as the volatility of energy prices has increased dramatically over the last three years, we have not been able to pass through to our customers all of the energy cost increases we have incurred. As a result, our operating margins have been adversely affected. Although we continue to evaluate our energy costs and consider ways to factor energy costs into our pricing, we cannot give assurance that our operating margins and results of operations will not continue to be adversely affected by rising energy costs.
We raise our selling prices in response to increases in raw material and energy costs. However, we are not always able to pass the full amount of these costs through to our customers on a timely basis due to supply and demand in the industry, and as a result often cannot maintain our operating margins in the face of dramatic cost increases. We experience margin shrinkage during all periods of cost increases due to customary time lags in implementing our price increases. We cannot give assurance that we will be able to recover any future increases in the cost of recovered fiber by raising the prices of our products. Even if we are able to recover future cost increases, our operating margins and results of operations may still be materially and adversely affected by time delays in the implementation of price increases.
24
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require management to make estimates that affect the amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities reported. The critical accounting matters that are very important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require some of managements most difficult, subjective and complex judgments are described in detail in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The accounting for these matters involves forming estimates based on current facts, circumstances and assumptions which, in managements judgment, could change in a manner that would materially affect managements future estimates with respect to such matters and, accordingly, could cause future reported financial condition and results of operations to differ materially from financial results reported based on managements current estimates. Changes in these estimates are recorded when better information is known. There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
The following table shows paperboard shipment volume and gross paper margins for the periods indicated. The gross paper margin information shown below is presented because it is the most significant driver of profitability for the paperboard segment and the tube, core and composite container segment. However, these drivers are not the only factors that can impact these segments. See Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 for additional discussion of factors that impact our business. Also note that a portion of our sales do not have related paperboard volume, such as sales of contract packaging services and sales of recovered fiber. The volume information shown below includes shipments of unconverted paperboard and converted paperboard products. Tonnage volumes from our business segments, excluding tonnage produced or converted by our unconsolidated joint ventures, are combined and presented along end-use market lines.
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
% Change |
||||||||||
Paperboard tons shipped by production source (in thousands): |
|||||||||||||
From internal paperboard mill production |
248.2 | 235.5 | 12.7 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||
Purchases from external sources |
36.9 | 27.9 | 9.0 | 32.3 | % | ||||||||
Total paperboard tonnage |
285.1 | 263.4 | 21.7 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||
Paperboard tons shipped by end-use market (in thousands): |
|||||||||||||
Tube, core and composite container volume |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
63.1 | 63.3 | (0.2 | ) | (0.3 | )% | |||||||
Purchases from external sources |
11.2 | 7.3 | 3.9 | 53.4 | % | ||||||||
Tube, core and composite container converted products |
74.3 | 70.6 | 3.7 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
11.5 | 10.5 | 1.0 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
Tube, core and composite container volume |
85.8 | 81.1 | 4.7 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
Folding carton volume |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
24.0 | 20.3 | 3.7 | 18.2 | % | ||||||||
Purchases from external sources |
22.4 | 16.8 | 5.6 | 33.3 | % | ||||||||
Folding carton converted products |
46.4 | 37.1 | 9.3 | 25.1 | % | ||||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
55.9 | 63.8 | (7.9 | ) | (12.4 | )% | |||||||
Folding carton volume |
102.3 | 100.9 | 1.4 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
Gypsum wallboard facing paper volume |
|||||||||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
26.1 | 24.9 | 1.2 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||
Other specialty products volume |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
18.6 | 18.9 | (0.3 | ) | (1.6 | )% | |||||||
Purchases from external sources |
3.3 | 3.8 | (0.5 | ) | (13.2 | )% | |||||||
Other specialty converted products |
21.9 | 22.7 | (0.8 | ) | (3.5 | )% | |||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
49.0 | 33.8 | 15.2 | 45.0 | % | ||||||||
Other specialty products volume |
70.9 | 56.5 | 14.4 | 25.5 | % | ||||||||
Total paperboard tonnage |
285.1 | 263.4 | 21.7 | 8.2 | % | ||||||||
Gross paper margins ($/ton): |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard mills: |
|||||||||||||
Average net selling price |
$ | 421 | $ | 419 | $ | 2 | 0.5 | % | |||||
Average recovered fiber cost |
111 | 93 | 18 | 19.4 | % | ||||||||
Paperboard mill gross paper margin |
$ | 310 | $ | 326 | $ | (16 | ) | (4.9 | )% | ||||
Tube and core facilities: |
|||||||||||||
Average net selling price |
$ | 821 | $ | 808 | $ | 13 | 1.6 | % | |||||
Average paperboard cost |
468 | 466 | 2 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||
Tube and core gross paper margin |
$ | 353 | $ | 342 | $ | 11 | 3.2 | % | |||||
25
The following table shows paperboard shipment volume on our business segment basis (thousands of tons).
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Change |
% Change |
||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||
Paperboard segment |
||||||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
142.5 | 133.0 | 9.5 | 7.1 | % | |||||
Paperboard shipped internally to converters in the paperboard segment |
11.8 | 12.0 | (0.2 | ) | (1.7 | )% | ||||
Paperboard purchased externally by converters in the paperboard segment |
0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 100.0 | % | |||||
Total volume |
154.7 | 145.2 | 9.5 | 6.5 | % | |||||
Tube, core and composite container segment |
||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
69.9 | 70.2 | (0.3 | ) | (0.4 | )% | ||||
Purchases from external sources |
14.1 | 10.9 | 3.2 | 29.4 | % | |||||
Total volume converted |
84.0 | 81.1 | 2.9 | 3.6 | % | |||||
Carton and custom packaging segment |
||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
24.0 | 20.3 | 3.7 | 18.2 | % | |||||
Purchases from external sources |
22.4 | 16.8 | 5.6 | 33.3 | % | |||||
Total volume converted |
46.4 | 37.1 | 9.3 | 25.1 | % | |||||
Total paperboard tonnage |
285.1 | 263.4 | 21.7 | 8.2 | % | |||||
Paperboard Tonnage. Total paperboard tonnage for the three months ended June 30, 2004, increased 8.2% to 285.1 thousand tons from 263.4 thousand tons for the same period in 2003. Likewise, tons sold from paperboard mill production and total tonnage converted increased 5.4% and 9.3%, respectively for the three months ended June 30, 2004, compared with the same period in 2003.
Total paperboard tonnage increased due to the following factors:
| An increase in sales of unconverted paperboard to the other specialty end-use market. |
| An increase in internal conversion by our folding carton and tube, core and composite container operations. |
These increases were partially offset by:
| A decrease in sales of unconverted paperboard to external customers in the folding carton end-use market, primarily driven by the idling of one of two coated recycled paperboard machines at our Rittman, Ohio facility. |
Sales. Our consolidated sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004, increased 8.8% to $268.5 million from $246.8 million in the same period in 2003. The following table presents sales by business segment (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
$ Change |
% Change |
||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
Paperboard |
$ | 93,447 | $ | 79,686 | $ | 13,761 | 17.3 | % | ||||
Tube, core and composite container |
99,139 | 95,581 | 3,558 | 3.7 | % | |||||||
Carton and custom packaging |
75,885 | 71,576 | 4,309 | 6.0 | % | |||||||
Total |
$ | 268,471 | $ | 246,843 | $ | 21,628 | 8.8 | % | ||||
Paperboard Segment
Sales for the paperboard segment increased due to the following factors:
| Sales from the paperboard segments non-mill operations, which include recovered fiber operations, chemical sales and converting operations, improved by approximately $9.9 million due to higher selling prices and an increase in brokered recovered fiber volume. |
| Higher volume of unconverted paperboard to external customers accounted for approximately $3.2 million of the increase. |
| Higher selling prices for unconverted paperboard accounted for approximately $500 thousand of the increase. |
26
Tube, Core and Composite Container Segment
Sales for the tube, core and composite container segment increased due to the following factors:
| Higher composite container products volume accounted for approximately $1.5 million of the increase. |
| Higher selling prices for tubes and cores accounted for approximately $1.1 million of the increase. |
| Higher volume for tubes and cores accounted for approximately $1.0 million of the increase. |
Carton and Custom Packaging Segment
Sales for the carton and custom packaging segment increased due to the following factors:
| Higher carton volume accounted for approximately $1.9 million of the increase. |
| Higher contract packaging volume accounted for approximately $1.8 million of the increase. |
Gross Profit Margin. Gross profit margin for the three months ended June 30, 2004, increased to 15.9% of sales from 15.5% in the same period in 2003. This margin increase was due to the following factors:
| A write-off of inventory and equipment in the second quarter of 2003 of $2.9 million in the paperboard and the tube, core and composite container segments. |
| A $1.6 million decrease in energy and fuel costs for our paperboard mills. |
| Higher tube and core gross paper margins accounted for approximately $900 thousand in higher gross profit. |
| In the second quarter of 2004, we recorded a $400 thousand reversal of an inventory reserve for a specific carton customer in Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2004. |
These factors were partially offset by:
| A decrease in paperboard mill gross paper margins lowered gross profit by approximately $3.7 million. This decline was primarily due to an increase in recovered fiber costs. |
| An $8.2 million increase in brokered recovered fiber sales which have substantially lower gross margins compared with our other businesses. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $33.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, a 16.7% decrease from the same period in 2003. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased due to the following factors:
| A $3.3 million reserve for accounts receivable recorded in the second quarter of 2003 for a significant carton customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2003. |
| Savings of $1.5 million resulting from closing and consolidating facilities. |
| Lower information technology costs of approximately $600 thousand. |
| In the second quarter of 2004, we recorded a $530 thousand reversal of an accounts receivable reserve for a specific carton customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy. |
27
Income (Loss) From Operations. Income from operations for the three months ending June 30, 2004 was $7.3 million, an increase of $11.6 million compared with an operating loss of $4.3 million for the same period in 2003. The following table presents income (loss) from operations by business segment (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, |
$ Change |
% Change |
||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard |
$ | 7,231 | $ | 4,715 | $ | 2,516 | 53.4 | % | ||||||
Tube, core and composite container |
4,547 | 2,606 | 1,941 | 74.5 | % | |||||||||
Carton and custom packaging |
473 | (6,193 | ) | 6,666 | N/A | |||||||||
Corporate expense |
(4,971 | ) | (5,429 | ) | 458 | 8.4 | % | |||||||
Total |
$ | 7,280 | $ | (4,301 | ) | $ | 11,581 | N/A | ||||||
Paperboard Segment
The increase in income from operations was due to the following factors:
| Higher 2004 paperboard mill volume accounted for approximately $1.9 million of the increase. |
| A write-off of approximately $1.7 million for inventory in the second quarter of 2003. |
| Lower energy and fuel costs of approximately $1.6 million. The decrease in costs was primarily due to higher operating rates by producing more paperboard tons using fewer machines. |
| Lower selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $900 thousand resulting from closing and consolidating facilities. |
These increases were partially offset by:
| Lower paperboard mill gross paper margins accounted for a decrease in income from operations of approximately $3.7 million. |
Tube, Core and Composite Container Segment
The increase in income from operations was due to the following factors:
| The write-off of inventory and equipment of approximately $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2003. |
| Higher tube and core gross paper margins accounted for approximately $900 thousand of the increase. |
Carton and Custom Packaging Segment
The increase in income from operations was due to the following factors:
| A $3.3 million reserve for accounts receivable recorded in the second quarter of 2003 for a significant carton customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy. |
| Lower restructuring costs of $1.2 million. |
| In the second quarter of 2004, we recorded a $900 thousand reversal of an accounts receivable and inventory reserve for a specific carton customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy. |
| Lower selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $700 thousand resulting from the Ashland, Ohio carton facility closure. |
| Higher sales accounted for approximately $500 thousand of the increase. |
Other Income (Expense). Interest expense decreased 4.4 % to $10.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 from $11.2 million for the same period in 2003. This decrease was due to the benefits of fixed to floating interest rate swaps. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for additional information regarding our debt, interest expense and interest rate swap agreements.
Equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates was $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, an improvement of $5.0 million over equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates of $1.4 million for the same period in 2003. This increase was primarily due to a $4.2 million improvement in operating results for Standard Gypsum, our gypsum wallboard joint venture with Temple-Inland. The improved results were due primarily to an increase in selling prices and volume driven by the strong housing and remodeling markets. Premier Boxboards results also improved by approximately $400 thousand in 2004 compared to 2003, primarily due to increased volume and higher selling prices.
28
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes. The effective rate of income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was 43.2% compared to a benefit of 36.6% for the same period in 2003. The effective rates for both periods are different from the statutory rates due to permanent tax adjustments. In addition, the income tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2004 included tax expense relating to an increase in the valuation for state net operating losses.
Net Income (Loss). Due to the factors discussed above, net income for the three months ending June 30, 2004 was $1.7 million, or $0.06 net income per common share, compared to net loss of $9.8 million, or $0.35 net loss per common share, for the same period in 2003.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
The following table shows paperboard shipment volume and gross paper margins for the periods indicated. The gross paper margin information shown below is presented because it is the most significant driver of profitability for the paperboard segment and the tube, core and composite container segment. However, these drivers are not the only factors that can impact these segments. See Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 for additional discussion of factors that impact our business. Also note that a portion of our sales do not have related paperboard volume, such as sales of contract packaging services and sales of recovered fiber. The volume information shown below includes shipments of unconverted paperboard and converted paperboard products. Tonnage volumes from our business segments, excluding tonnage produced or converted by our unconsolidated joint ventures, are combined and presented along end-use market lines.
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Change |
% |
|||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Paperboard tons shipped by production source (in thousands): |
|||||||||||||
From internal paperboard mill production |
494.1 | 491.6 | 2.5 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||
Purchases from external sources |
72.6 | 56.5 | 16.1 | 28.5 | % | ||||||||
Total paperboard tonnage |
566.7 | 548.1 | 18.6 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||
Paperboard tons shipped by end-use market (in thousands): |
|||||||||||||
Tube, core and composite container volume |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
123.5 | 125.5 | (2.0 | ) | (1.6 | )% | |||||||
Purchases from external sources |
21.9 | 12.8 | 9.1 | 71.1 | % | ||||||||
Tube, core and composite container converted products |
145.4 | 138.3 | 7.1 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
24.9 | 23.0 | 1.9 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||
Tube, core and composite container volume |
170.3 | 161.3 | 9.0 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||
Folding carton volume |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
48.7 | 46.2 | 2.5 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||
Purchases from external sources |
45.3 | 35.1 | 10.2 | 29.1 | % | ||||||||
Folding carton converted products |
94.0 | 81.3 | 12.7 | 15.6 | % | ||||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
117.5 | 139.2 | (21.7 | ) | (15.6 | )% | |||||||
Folding carton volume |
211.5 | 220.5 | (9.0 | ) | (4.1 | )% | |||||||
Gypsum wallboard facing paper volume |
|||||||||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
51.8 | 54.2 | (2.4 | ) | (4.4 | )% | |||||||
Other specialty products volume |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
36.9 | 35.2 | 1.7 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||
Purchases from external sources |
5.4 | 8.6 | (3.2 | ) | (37.2 | )% | |||||||
Other specialty converted products |
42.3 | 43.8 | (1.5 | ) | (3.4 | )% | |||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
90.8 | 68.3 | 22.5 | 32.9 | % | ||||||||
Other specialty products volume |
133.1 | 112.1 | 21.0 | 18.7 | % | ||||||||
Total paperboard tonnage |
566.7 | 548.1 | 18.6 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||
Gross paper margins ($/ton): |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard mills: |
|||||||||||||
Average net selling price |
$ | 419 | $ | 415 | $ | 4 | 1.0 | % | |||||
Average recovered fiber cost |
105 | 87 | 18 | 20.7 | % | ||||||||
Paperboard mill gross paper margin |
$ | 314 | $ | 328 | $ | (14 | ) | (4.3 | )% | ||||
Tube and core facilities: |
|||||||||||||
Average net selling price |
$ | 821 | $ | 807 | $ | 14 | 1.7 | % | |||||
Average paperboard cost |
468 | 465 | 3 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||
Tube and core gross paper margin |
$ | 353 | $ | 342 | $ | 11 | 3.2 | % | |||||
29
The following table shows paperboard shipment volume on our business segment basis (thousands of tons).
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Change |
% Change |
||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||
Paperboard segment | ||||||||||
Unconverted paperboard shipped to external customers |
285.0 | 284.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | % | |||||
Paperboard shipped internally to converters in the paperboard segment |
22.5 | 24.1 | (1.6 | ) | (6.6 | )% | ||||
Paperboard purchased externally by converters in the paperboard segment |
0.2 | 0.3 | (0.1 | ) | (33.3 | )% | ||||
Total volume |
307.7 | 309.1 | (1.4 | ) | (0.5 | )% | ||||
Tube, core and composite container segment |
||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
137.9 | 136.6 | 1.3 | 1.0 | % | |||||
Purchases from external sources |
27.1 | 21.1 | 6.0 | 28.4 | % | |||||
Total volume converted |
165.0 | 157.7 | 7.3 | 4.6 | % | |||||
Carton and custom packaging segment |
||||||||||
Paperboard (internal) |
48.7 | 46.2 | 2.5 | 5.4 | % | |||||
Purchases from external sources |
45.3 | 35.1 | 10.2 | 29.1 | % | |||||
Total volume converted |
94.0 | 81.3 | 12.7 | 15.6 | % | |||||
Total paperboard tonnage |
566.7 | 548.1 | 18.6 | 3.4 | % | |||||
Paperboard Tonnage. Total paperboard tonnage for the six months ended June 30, 2004, increased 3.4% to 566.7 thousand tons from 548.1 thousand tons for the same period in 2003. Tons sold from paperboard mill production increased 0.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2004, compared to the same period in 2003. Total tonnage converted increased 6.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Total paperboard tonnage increased due to the following factors:
| An increase in sales of unconverted paperboard to the other specialty end-use market. |
| An increase in internal conversion by our folding carton and tube and core operations. |
These increases were partially offset by:
| A decrease in sales of unconverted paperboard to external customers in the folding carton end-use market, primarily driven by the idling of one of two coated recycled paperboard machines at our Rittman, Ohio facility, combined with weak demand in our coated paperboard mill system. |
Sales. Our consolidated sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004, increased 5.2% to $525.6 million from $499.7 million for the same period in 2003. The following table presents sales by business segment (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, |
$ Change |
% Change |
||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
Paperboard |
$ | 181,306 | $ | 163,589 | $ | 17,717 | 10.8 | % | ||||
Tube, core and composite container |
193,362 | 190,539 | 2,823 | 1.5 | % | |||||||
Carton and custom packaging |
150,898 | 145,617 | 5,281 | 3.6 | % | |||||||
Total |
$ | 525,566 | $ | 499,745 | $ | 25,821 | 5.2 | % | ||||
Paperboard Segment
Sales in the paperboard segment increased due to higher sales from the paperboard segments non-mill operations, which include recovered fiber operations, chemical sales and converting operations, of approximately $17.6 million due to higher selling prices and an increase in brokered recovered fiber sales.
30
Tube, Core and Composite Container Segment
Sales for the tube, core and composite container segment increased due to the following factors:
| Higher composite container products volume accounted for approximately $2.1 million of the increase. |
| Higher selling prices for tubes and cores accounted for approximately $1.8 million of the increase. |
The increases were partially offset by a decline in sales of plastic cores of approximately $1.2 million.
Carton and Custom Packaging Segment
Sales for the carton and custom packaging segment increased due to the following factors:
| Higher carton volume accounted for approximately $1.4 million of the increase. |
| Higher contract packaging volume accounted for approximately $3.1 million of the increase. |
| Higher average selling prices accounted for approximately $500 thousand of the increase. |
Gross Profit Margin. Gross profit margin for the six months ended June 30, 2004, decreased to 15.0% of sales from 16.0% in the same period in 2003. This margin decrease was due to the following factors:
| A decline in paperboard mill gross paper margins lowered gross profit by approximately $7.3 million. This decline was primarily due to an increase in recovered fiber costs. |
| A reserve for inventory of $1.7 million for a specific carton customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2004. |
| A $14.4 million increase in brokered recovered fiber sales which have substantially lower gross margins compared with our other businesses. |
These factors were partially offset by:
| A $3.5 million decrease in energy and fuel costs for our paperboard mills. |
| A write-off of inventory and equipment in the second quarter of 2003 of $2.9 million in the paperboard and tube, core and composite container segments. |
| Higher tube and core gross paper margins accounted for approximately $1.7 million in higher gross profits. The increase was primarily due to higher selling prices. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $69.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, a 13.2% decrease from the same period in 2003. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased due to the following factors:
| Savings of $3.9 million resulting from closing and consolidating facilities. |
| A $3.3 million reserve for accounts receivable recorded in the second quarter of 2003 for a significant carton customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy. |
| Expenses of $1.5 million related to idling one of two coated recycled paperboard machines at our Rittman, Ohio facility recorded in 2003. |
| Lower information technology costs of approximately $1.1 million. |
Restructuring and Impairment Costs. In March 2003, we announced the permanent closure of our Buffalo Paperboard mill located in Lockport, New York. We recorded a charge of approximately $4.3 million in connection with this closure. The majority of the Buffalo mills sales were transferred to our other paperboard mills and our 50 percent owned Premier Boxboard joint venture. The exit plan for Buffalo was competed in May 2004 when the property was sold.
31
In June 2003, we initiated a plan to permanently close our Ashland, Ohio carton facility. We recorded a charge of $6.7 million in connection with this closure. We restructured this facility in 2002; however, due to severe margin pressure and excess industry capacity, the aggressive downsizing undertaken in December 2002 was unsuccessful so the facility was permanently closed. Substantially all of Ashlands carton sales were transferred to our other carton manufacturing facilities. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded an additional $429 thousand charge for impairment of assets and $859 thousand for other exit costs related to this restructuring activity.
In January 2004, we announced the permanent closure of our Cedartown Paperboard mill located in Cedartown, Georgia. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded a charge of approximately $1.2 million in connection with this closure, including a $500 thousand impairment charge for assets. All of the paperboard produced at this facility had been consumed internally by our converting operations. The paperboard production was transitioned to our other paperboard mills. This closure is not expected to have a significant impact on our operations and is expected to improve operating results and capacity utilization.
In January 2004, we initiated a plan to centralize the accounting and finance operations to our headquarters located in Austell, Georgia. This action was initiated to enhance the control environment and reduce costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded a charge of approximately $1.6 million in connection with this plan. This plan is expected to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2004.
In June 2004, we announced the closure of our Charlotte, North Carolina carton plant and our Georgetown, Kentucky plastics plant. The closure of these two facilities is part of the previously announced initiatives to right-size operations to better utilize capacity and achieve greater cost efficiencies. As of June 30, 2004, no costs had been recorded in connection with these closures. We expect to incur total restructuring costs of approximately $3.2 million, of which approximately $1.2 million will be non-cash. Customers of these facilities will be served by our other carton and plastics operations.
During 2001 and 2002, we initiated restructuring activities to consolidate our Carolina Converting Inc. operation with our Carolina Components operation, to close the Chicago paperboard mill, and to close the Halifax paperboard mill. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we incurred an additional $246 thousand charge for impairment of assets and an additional $278 thousand for other exit costs related to these restructuring activities. All of these restructuring activities are substantially complete except for selling the real estate or fulfilling our obligation under a real estate lease.
See the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our restructuring plans.
Income (Loss) From Operations. Income from operations for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, was $5.2 million, an increase of $10.9 million compared with operating loss of $5.7 million for the same period in 2003. The following table presents income (loss) from operations by business segment (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, |
$ Change |
% Change |
||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Paperboard |
$ | 12,051 | $ | 6,595 | $ | 5,456 | 82.7 | % | ||||||
Tube, core and composite container |
7,826 | 4,940 | 2,886 | 58.4 | % | |||||||||
Carton and custom packaging |
(4,063 | ) | (6,274 | ) | 2,211 | 35.2 | % | |||||||
Corporate expense |
(10,629 | ) | (10,932 | ) | 303 | 2.8 | % | |||||||
Total |
$ | 5,185 | $ | (5,671 | ) | $ | 10,856 | N/A | ||||||
Paperboard Segment
Income from operations increased due to the following factors:
| Lower fuel and energy costs of $3.5 million. The decrease in costs was primarily due to higher operating rates by producing more paperboard tons using fewer machines. |
| Lower restructuring costs of $2.8 million. |
| Lower selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $2.6 million resulting from closing and consolidating operations. |
| A write-off of inventory of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2003. |
| Expenses of $1.5 million related to idling one of two coated recycled paperboard machines at our Rittman, Ohio facility recorded in 2003. |
32
These increases were partially offset by lower paperboard mill gross paper margins, which accounted for a decrease in income from operations of approximately $7.3 million driven by recovered fiber cost increases.
Tube, Core and Composite Container Segment
Income from operations increased due to the following factors:
| Higher tube and core gross paper margins accounted for approximately $1.7 million of the increase. |
| The write-off of inventory and equipment of $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2003. |
Carton and Custom Packaging Segment
The decline in the loss from operations was due to the following factors:
| A $3.3 million reserve for accounts receivable recorded in the 2003 for a significant carton customer that filed chapter 11 bankruptcy. |
| Lower selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $1.3 million, resulting from closing the Ashland, Ohio carton facility. |
| Higher volume accounted for an improvement of approximately $650 thousand. |
| Lower restructuring costs of $275 thousand. |
These factors were partially offset by:
| A reserve for inventory and accounts receivable of $2.5 million for a specific carton customer that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2004. |
| Lower margins in our carton and custom packaging segment decreased operating results by approximately $1.1 million due to higher paperboard costs. |
Other Income (Expense). Interest expense remained essentially flat during the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for additional information regarding our debt, interest expense and interest rate swap agreements.
Equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates was $9.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, an improvement of $7.6 million over equity in income from unconsolidated affiliates of $1.5 million for the same period in 2003. This increase was primarily due to a $6.9 million improvement in operating results for Standard Gypsum, our gypsum wallboard joint venture with Temple-Inland. The improved results were due primarily to an increase in selling prices and volume driven by the strong housing and remodeling markets. Premier Boxboards results improved slightly for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to 2003, primarily due to increased volume and higher selling prices, partially offset by higher recovered fiber costs.
Benefit for Income Taxes. The effective rate of income tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2004, was 29.6% compared to 37.0% for the same period in 2003. The effective rates for both periods are different from the statutory rates due to permanent tax adjustments. In addition, the income tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2004 included tax expense relating to an increase in the valuation for state net operating losses.
Net Loss. Due to the factors discussed above, net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was $5.0 million, or $0.18 net loss per common share, compared to net loss of $17.0 million, or $0.61 net loss per common share, for the same period in 2003.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity Sources and Risks. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash from operations and borrowings under our senior credit facility, described below. Downturns in operations can significantly affect our ability to generate cash. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, there was a use of cash in operating activities of $1.0 million compared with a source of cash of $16.9 million during the same period in 2003. See Cash from Operations below. Although the timing or certainty of the following events cannot be assured, we believe that our existing cash and liquidity position will be strengthened through the sale of the real estate at our Chicago, Illinois and Baltimore, Maryland paperboard mills and internal cost reduction initiatives. We believe that our cash on hand at June 30, 2004 of $76.3 million and borrowing availability under our senior credit facility will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the next twelve months and the foreseeable future. Additionally, based on our historical ability to generate cash, we believe we will be able to meet our long-term cash requirements. However, if we are
33
unable to generate cash at historic levels our ability to generate cash sufficient to meet long-term requirements is uncertain. The following are factors that could affect our future ability to generate cash from operations:
| A contraction in domestic demand for recycled paperboard and related packaging products similar to what our industry experienced in 2000, 2001 and 2002. |
| Alternative products such as flexible packaging and plastics which replaced certain paper board packaging products. |
| Continued export of domestic manufacturing operations. |
| Significant unforeseen adverse conditions in our industry or the markets we serve. |
Although we believe that our liquidity will be sufficient to meet expected needs for the foreseeable future, the occurrence, continuation or exacerbation of these conditions could require us to seek additional funds from external sources in order to meet our liquidity requirements. In such event, our ability to obtain such funds would depend on the various business and credit market conditions prevailing at the time, which are difficult to predict and many of which are out of our control. Availability of additional funds could also be materially adversely affected by our substantial existing indebtedness. Additional risks related to our substantial indebtedness are discussed under Risk Factors Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to fulfill our obligations under our indebtedness in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The availability of liquidity from borrowings under our senior credit facility is primarily affected by our continued compliance with the terms of the agreement governing our senior credit facility, including the payment of interest and compliance with various covenants and financial maintenance tests. We were in compliance with the covenants under our senior credit facility during 2003 and the six months ended June 30, 2004. Absent further material deterioration of the U.S. economy as a whole or the specific sectors on which our business depends, we believe it is likely that we will be in compliance with our covenants under the senior credit agreement for the balance of 2004 and the foreseeable future.
Borrowings. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, total debt (consisting of current maturities of debt and long-term debt, as reported on our condensed consolidated balance sheets) was as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Senior credit facility |
$ | | $ | | ||||
9 7/8% senior subordinated notes |
285,000 | 285,000 | ||||||
7 3/8% senior notes |
189,750 | 193,250 | ||||||
7 1/4% senior notes |
29,000 | 29,000 | ||||||
Other notes payable |
9,810 | 9,895 | ||||||
Mark-to-market value of interest swap agreements |
(2,711 | ) | (1,145 | ) | ||||
Realized interest rate swap gains (1) |
14,373 | 15,107 | ||||||
Total debt |
$ | 525,222 | $ | 531,107 | ||||
(1) | Net of original issuance discounts and accumulated discount amortization related to the senior and senior subordinated notes. As described below under Interest Rate Swap Agreements, realized gains resulting from unwinding interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of debt and will be accreted as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. |
Our senior credit facility provides for a revolving line of credit of $75.0 million and is secured primarily by a first priority security interest in our accounts receivable and inventory. The facility matures in June 2006. Borrowing availability is subject to borrowing base requirements established by eligible accounts receivable and inventory. The facility includes a subfacility of $50.0 million for letters of credit, usage of which reduces availability under the facility. As of June 30, 2004, no borrowings were outstanding under the facility; however, an aggregate of $41.2 million in letter of credit obligations were outstanding. Availability under the facility at June 30, 2004, was limited to $23.8 million after taking into consideration outstanding letter of credit obligations and minimum borrowing availability requirements.
Borrowings under the facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either (1) the base rate (which is the prime rate most recently announced by Bank of America, N.A., the administrative agent under the facility) plus a margin of 0.50% or (2) the adjusted Eurodollar Interbank Offered Rate plus a margin of 2.50%. The undrawn portion of the facility is subject to a facility fee at an annual rate of 0.50%. Outstanding letters of credit are subject to an annual fee equal to the applicable margin for Eurodollar-based loans.
The facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability and our subsidiaries ability to create liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, incur indebtedness and guarantees, pay dividends, repurchase or redeem capital stock and indebtedness, make certain investments or acquisitions, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, make capital expenditures in
34
excess of $30.0 million per year or change the nature of our business. The facility also contains a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant, which applies only in the event borrowing availability falls below $10.0 million or suppressed availability falls below $20.0 million. Suppressed availability is defined as the amount of eligible accounts receivable and inventory (less reserves and aggregate credit outstandings) in excess of $75.0 million or the amount of eligible inventory (less reserves and aggregate credit outstandings) in excess of $37.5 million. The fixed charge ratio covenant did not require measurement at June 30, 2004. Based on levels of accounts receivable and inventory and liquidity at June 30, 2004 and expectations for the remainder of 2004, we do not expect to be required to measure the fixed charge ratio covenant in 2004.
The facility contains events of default including, but not limited to, nonpayment of principal or interest, violation of covenants, breaches of representations and warranties, cross-default to other indebtedness, bankruptcy and other insolvency events, material judgments, certain ERISA events, actual or asserted invalidity of loan documentation and certain changes of control of our Company.
On June 1, 1999, we issued $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 7 3/8% senior notes due June 1, 2009. Our 7 3/8% senior notes were issued at a discount to yield an effective interest rate of 7.47%, are unsecured obligations of our Company and pay interest semiannually. After taking into account realized gains from unwinding various interest rate swap agreements, the current effective interest rate of the 7 3/8% senior notes is 6.4%. In connection with the offering of our 7 1/4% senior notes and 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes, as described below, our subsidiary guarantors also guaranteed our 7 3/8% senior notes. We have purchased an aggregate of $10.3 million in principal amount of our outstanding 7 3/8% senior notes in the open market, including $3.5 million purchased in February 2004. These purchases lowered our interest expense by approximately $700 thousand annually.
On March 29, 2001, we issued $29.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7 1/4% senior notes due May 1, 2010 and $285.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes due April 1, 2011. The 7 1/4% senior notes and 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes were issued at a discount to yield effective interest rates of 9.4% and 10.5%, respectively. After taking into account realized gains from unwinding various interest rate swap agreements, the current effective interest rate of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes is 9.2%. These publicly traded notes are unsecured, but are guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of our domestic subsidiaries, other than one that is not wholly-owned.
See Subsequent Event regarding our purchase of $10.0 million of our 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes in the open market.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements. In January 2003, we effectively unwound $85.0 million of our $135.0 million interest rate swap agreement related to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes by assigning our rights and obligations under the swap to one of the lenders under our senior credit facility. In exchange, we received approximately $4.3 million. The $4.3 million gain, which is classified as a component of debt, will be accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense. The $4.3 million gain lowered the effective interest rate of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes by approximately 30 basis points.
In May 2003, we unwound the remaining $50.0 million of our $50.0 million interest rate swap agreement related to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes, and received approximately $4.6 million from the bank counter-party. Simultaneously, we unwound $50.0 million of our remaining interest rate swap agreements related to the 7 3/8% senior notes, and received approximately $7.1 million. The $11.7 million gain, which is classified as a component of debt, will be accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense. The $4.6 million gain lowered the effective interest rate of the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes by approximately 30 basis points. The $7.1 million gain lowered the effective interest rate of the 7 3/8% senior notes by approximately 80 basis points.
In July 2003, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement, which had payment and expiration dates that corresponded to the terms of the note obligations it covered, effectively converted $50.0 million of our fixed rate 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates were based on the sixmonth LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
In December 2003, we entered into a second interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement, which has payment and expiration dates that correspond to the terms of the note obligations it covers, effectively converted $50.0 million of our fixed rate 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates are based on the sixmonth LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
In March 2004, we unwound our July 2003 $50.0 million interest rate swap agreement related to the 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes and received approximately $380 thousand from the bank counter-party. The $380 thousand gain, which is classified as a component of debt, will be accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the notes and will partially offset the increase in interest expense.
35
In April 2004, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement in the notional amount of $50.0 million. This agreement, which has payment and expiration dates that correspond to the terms of the note obligations it covers, effectively converted $50.0 million of our fixed rate 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes into variable rate obligations. The variable rates are based on six-month LIBOR plus a fixed margin.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Joint Venture Financings. As noted above, we own a 50% interest in two joint ventures with Temple-Inland, Inc.: Standard Gypsum, L.P. and Premier Boxboard Limited LLC. Because we account for these interests in our joint ventures under the equity method of accounting, the indebtedness of these joint ventures is not reflected in the liabilities included on our consolidated balance sheets. Standard Gypsum manufactures gypsum wallboard, and Premier Boxboard is a low-cost recycled paperboard mill that produces a lightweight gypsum facing paper and containerboard grades.
Since December 31, 2003, there has been no material change in our obligations with respect to the letter of credit obligations of these joint ventures, or in the additional contingencies related to buy-sell agreements for our interests in the joint ventures. For more information about these obligations and contingencies, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Cash from Operations. Cash used in operations was $1.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004, compared with cash generated from operations of $16.9 million for the same period in 2003. The $17.9 million decline in operating cash flow was due to the following factors:
| An $18.7 million use of cash related to an increase in accounts receivable. The increase in accounts receivable was due to higher sales for the comparative periods, partially offset by improved collections. |
| A $17.2 million federal tax refund was received in the first quarter of 2003. |
| A $3.5 million use of cash due to higher inventory balances. |
In addition to improved operating results, the following factors partially offset those listed above:
| A $9.4 million increase in accrued liabilities primarily due to the payment of liabilities owed to our 50% owned, unconsolidated joint venture, Premier Boxboard Limited in the first quarter of 2003 combined with higher accrued compensation. |
| A $3.1 million increase in accounts payable. The increase in accounts payable was a part of managements initiatives to improve working capital and was accomplished by extending payment terms to vendors to be more consistent with industry averages. |
| A $2.9 million increase in cash distributions from our 50% owned, unconsolidated joint venture, Standard Gypsum. |
Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures were $8.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, versus $10.8 million for the same period in 2003. Aggregate capital expenditures of approximately $20.0 million are anticipated for 2004. To conserve cash, we intend to limit capital expenditures to cost reduction, productivity improvement and replacement projects.
Inflation
Raw material and energy cost changes have had, and continue to have, a significant effect on our operations. We do not believe that general economic inflation is a significant determinant of our raw material and energy cost increases or that it has a material effect on our operations.
Subsequent Event
In July 2004, we purchased $10.0 million of our 9 7/8% senior subordinated notes in the open market for $10.4 million. This purchase reduced our total long-term debt. In addition to the $10.0 million purchased in July 2004, our Board of Directors authorized purchases of up to $20.0 million of our senior and senior subordinated notes as market conditions warrant. However, these purchase may be limited by compliance with certain debt obligation agreements.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Item 1 Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements regarding new accounting pronouncements.
36
Contractual Obligations
For a discussion of our contractual obligations, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources Contractual Obligations and Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. There have been no significant developments with respect to our contractual obligations since December 31, 2003.
Forward-Looking Information
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains certain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that represent our expectations, anticipations or beliefs about future events, operating results or financial condition. For this purpose, any statements that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially depending on a variety of important factors, including, but not limited to, fluctuations in raw material prices and energy costs, increases in pension and insurance costs, downturns in industrial production, housing and construction and the consumption of durable and nondurable goods, the degree and nature of competition, demand for our products, the degree of success achieved by our new product initiatives, changes in government regulations, our ability to complete acquisitions and successfully integrate the operations of acquired businesses (including specifically the acquired Smurfit-Stone industrial packaging operations), our ability to service our substantial indebtedness and unforeseen difficulties with the consolidation and relocation of our accounting and control operations and the integration of our IT systems. Additional relevant risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. With respect to such forward-looking statements, we claim protection under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our SEC filings are available from us, and also may be examined at public reference facilities maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission or, to the extent filed via EDGAR, accessed through the Web Site of the Securities and Exchange Commission (http://www.sec.gov). We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements and are not responsible for any changes made to this 10-Q by wire or Internet services.
Risk Factors
For a discussion of our risk factors, see Risk Factors in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. There have been no significant developments with respect to our risk factors since December 31, 2003.
37
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
PART I
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For a discussion of certain market risks related to us, see Part II, Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. There have been no significant developments with respect to our exposure to interest rate market risk. See Note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information about our interest rate swap agreements and transactions since December 31, 2003.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (disclosure controls). Included with the exhibits to this quarterly report are certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer that are required to be furnished by SEC rules adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The information discussed in this section of our quarterly report relates to the evaluations of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting referenced in these certifications and should be read in conjunction with these certifications.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the reality of resource constraints; accordingly the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.
Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and possible omissions or misstatements due to fraud or error, if any, within our Company have been detected. Among the inherent limitations in controls are the potential for erroneous judgments and decisions or simple errors or mistakes in the chain of recording, processing, summarizing or reporting information. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the intentional acts of individuals or multiple persons acting in concert, or by management override. The design of any system of controls also is based in part on assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and we can give no assurance that our controls, as designed, will succeed in achieving their stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In conjunction with its 2002 audit of our financial statements, our independent accountants, Deloitte & Touche LLP, identified certain items they described as reportable conditions, relating primarily to the decentralized nature of our Company and the inconsistent application of certain written policies. In 2003, the Company undertook a process of implementing improvements to its policies and engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to do an extensive evaluation of the Companys internal controls, both to prepare our Company to comply with the new annual certification regarding internal control over financial reporting that will be required as of December 31, 2004 pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rulemaking, as well as to assist the Company in conforming to certain best practices recommendations with respect to internal controls . In 2003, Deloitte & Touche did not identify any reportable conditions in connection with the audit of the Companys financial statements. Our efforts to implement improvements in these areas continue, and further improvements will be necessary, in order for our Company to comply with the upcoming internal controls certification requirement mandated by Section 404. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Risk Factors Our business is subject to changing regulation of corporate governance and public disclosure that has increased both our costs and the risk of noncompliance, for more information regarding these matters.
Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls discussed above, and subject to the disclosures and limitations noted above, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is timely alerted to material information relating to Caraustar and its consolidated subsidiaries required to be included in the Companys reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Subject to the disclosures and limitations noted above, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
38
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Our annual shareholders meeting was held on May 19, 2004. The matters voted upon at the meeting were (1) a proposal to elect three Class III directors and one Class I director (Daniel P. Casey, Robert J. Clanin, James E. Rogers, and L. Celeste Bottorff), (2) a proposal to approve the Companys 2004 Directors Equity Plan and (3) a proposal to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent public accountants for fiscal 2004. Proposals (1) and (3) were approved by the following margins, and proposal (2) was rejected by the following margin:
Proposal |
Votes for |
Votes Against or Withheld |
Abstentions |
Broker Nonvotes | ||||
(1)Election of Directors |
||||||||
Daniel P. Casey |
23,984,162 | 1,262,638 | | | ||||
Robert J. Clanin |
23,983,974 | 1,262,826 | | | ||||
James E. Rogers |
24,355,196 | 891,604 | | | ||||
L. Celeste Bottorff |
23,853,377 | 1,393,423 | | | ||||
(2)Approval of 2004 Directors Equity Plan |
9,037,156 | 13,580,744 | 63,200 | | ||||
(3)Ratification of Selection of Independent Public Accountants |
24,320,093 | 903,203 | 23,504 | |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
a) | Exhibits |
The Exhibits to this Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index.
b) | Reports on Form 8-K |
We furnished three current reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2004. The first report, furnished on May 5, 2004, attached excerpts from a management presentation.
The second report, furnished on May 5, 2004, attached our press release announcing our financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
The third report, furnished on May 19, 2004, attached excerpts from a management presentation at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
39
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. | ||||
By: |
/s/ Ronald J. Domanico | |||
Ronald J. Domanico | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
Date: August 9, 2004 |
40
Exhibit No. |
Description | |||
3.01 | | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (Incorporated by reference Exhibit 3.01 to Annual Report for 1992 on Form 10-K [SEC File No. 0-20646]) | ||
3.02 | | Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by reference Exhibit 3.02 to Annual Report for 2001 on Form 10-K [SEC File No. 0-20646]) | ||
31.01 | | Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
31.02 | | Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.01 | | Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
32.02 | | Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| Filed herewith |
41