COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES INC /NEW/ - 10-Q Quarterly Report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition periods from to

Commission file number 0-11053

COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania

23-2093008

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or

organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

100 CTE Drive

Dallas, Pennsylvania 18612-9774

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (570) 631-2700

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES x NO ¨

As of June 30, 2004 there were 21,063,790 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $1.00 par value per share, outstanding.

COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES, INC.

INDEX


		Page

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003	3

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003	5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Shareholders’ Equity Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003	6

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	30

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	31

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	31

Item 2.	Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	31

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	32

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	32

Item 5.	Other Information	32

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	33

	SIGNATURES	34

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Sales	$	84,014		$	83,001		$	168,394		$	166,159
Costs and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization and restructuring reversals		40,053			40,325			80,440			80,152
Depreciation and amortization		18,025			17,509			35,632			35,136
Restructuring reversals		(799	)		—			(799	)		—

Operating income		26,735			25,167			53,121			50,871
Interest and dividend income		1,216			474			2,292			1,180
Interest expense		(4,325	)		(2,208	)		(8,812	)		(4,596	)
Other income (expense), net		502			(1,193	)		519			(1,158	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities		1,790			1,423			2,025			1,654

Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change		25,918			23,663			49,145			47,951
Provision for income taxes		9,600			8,449			18,262			17,783

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change		16,318			15,214			30,883			30,168
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—			—			—			13,230

Net income	$	16,318		$	15,214		$	30,883		$	43,398
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax		915			185			1,149			449

Comprehensive income	$	17,233		$	15,399		$	32,032		$	43,847

Basic earnings per share:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.77		$	0.65		$	1.42		$	1.29
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—			—			—			0.56

Net income	$	0.77		$	0.65		$	1.42		$	1.85

Weighted average shares outstanding		21,207,371			23,515,230			21,674,971			23,476,185
Diluted earnings per share:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.76		$	0.64		$	1.41		$	1.27
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—			—			—			0.56

Net income	$	0.76		$	0.64		$	1.41		$	1.83

Weighted average shares and common stock equivalents outstanding		21,387,484			23,720,987			21,836,286			23,657,039

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)


	June 30, 2004			December 31, 2003
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and temporary cash investments	$	264,163		$	336,035
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenues, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of $2,591 at June 30, 2004 and $2,329 at December 31, 2003		47,562			50,240
Other current assets		12,982			9,387
Deferred income taxes		17,460			17,016

Total current assets		342,167			412,678
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $481,400 at June 30, 2004 and $452,989 at December 31, 2003		394,500			410,485
Investments		10,201			10,204
Other assets		16,343			18,286

Total assets	$	763,211		$	851,653

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	—		$	5,623
Capital lease obligation		721			777
Notes payable		50,000			65,000
Accounts payable		25,458			29,135
Accrued restructuring expense		74			812
Accrued expenses		47,277			49,045
Accrued interest		5,075			5,286
Advance billings and customer deposits		5,478			5,212

Total current liabilities		134,083			160,890
Long-term debt		300,000			323,898
Capital lease obligation		721			1,082
Deferred income taxes		83,584			79,876
Other liabilities		19,463			23,178
Common shareholders’ equity:
Common Stock ($1 par value, authorized: 85,000,000 and 85,000,000; issued: 24,110,833 and 24,013,902; outstanding: 21,063,790 and 22,806,886, at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively)		24,112			24,014
Additional paid-in capital		276,983			267,076
Deferred compensation		(11,878	)		(6,451	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,341	)		(2,490	)
Retained earnings		55,783			24,900
Treasury stock at cost, 3,047,043 and 1,207,016 shares at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively		(118,299	)		(44,320	)

Total common shareholders’ equity		225,360			262,729

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	763,211		$	851,653

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Six months ended June 30,
	2004			2003
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	62,344		$	54,769
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to property, plant & equipment		(19,921	)		(19,466	)
Other		2,336			2,689

Net cash used in investing activities		(17,585	)		(16,777	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Redemption of long-term debt		(29,521	)		(29,504	)
Redemption of short-term debt		(15,000	)		—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		2,751			3,329
Capital lease payments		(417	)		(66	)
Payment made for debt issuance costs		(82	)		—
Stock repurchases		(74,362	)		—

Net cash used in financing activities		(116,631	)		(26,241	)

Net (decrease)/increase in cash and temporary cash investments		(71,872	)		11,751

Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of year		336,035			34,935

Cash and temporary cash investments at June 30,	$	264,163		$	46,686

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the periods for:
Interest	$	7,988		$	4,784

Income taxes	$	15,513		$	13,307

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

(Unaudited)


	Common Par Value			Class B Par Value			Additional Paid-in Capital		Deferred Comp.			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Retained Earnings (Deficit)		Treasury Stock			Total Common Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, December 31, 2002	$	21,489		$	5,818		$	256,594	$	(2,676	)	$	(6,961	)	$	77,969	$	(131,243	)	$	220,990
Net income																43,398					43,398
Restricted stock		154						5,722		(4,751	)										1,125
Conversions		8			(8	)															—
Stock plan transactions		123						3,208													3,331
Executive stock purchase plan										(411	)										(411	)
Tax benefits related to stock options								588													588
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax													449								449
401(k) match								28										135			163

Balance, June 30, 2003	$	21,774		$	5,810		$	266,140	$	(7,838	)	$	(6,512	)	$	121,367	$	(131,108	)	$	269,633

Balance, December 31, 2003	$	24,014			—		$	267,076	$	(6,451	)	$	(2,490	)	$	24,900	$	(44,320	)	$	262,729
Net income																30,883					30,883
Restricted stock		(6	)					6,747		(4,812	)										1,929
Stock plan transactions		104						2,647													2,751
Executive stock purchase plan										(615	)										(615	)
Tax benefits related to stock options								438													438
Stock repurchases																		(74,362	)		(74,362	)
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax													1,149								1,149
401(k) match								75										383			458

Balance, June 30, 2004	$	24,112			—		$	276,983	$	(11,878	)	$	(1,341	)	$	55,783	$	(118,299	)	$	225,360


	Common Stock						Class B Common Stock
	Shares Issued		Treasury Stock		Shares Outstanding		Shares Issued		Treasury Stock	Shares Outstanding
Balance, December 31, 2002	21,488,697		44,484		21,444,213		5,818,684		3,784,649	2,034,035
Conversions	8,654		—		8,654		(8,654	)	—	(8,654	)
Stock plan transactions	114,446		—		114,446		—		—	—
Restricted stock	154,125		—		154,125		—		—	—
401(k) match	—		(3,952	)	3,952		—		—	—

Balance, June 30, 2003	21,765,922		40,532		21,725,390		5,810,030		3,784,649	2,025,381


	Common Stock						Class B Common Stock
	Shares Issued		Treasury Stock		Shares Outstanding		Shares Issued		Treasury Stock	Shares Outstanding
Balance, December 31, 2003	24,013,902		1,207,016		22,806,886		—		—	—
Stock plan transactions	102,931		—		102,931		—		—	—
Stock repurchase program	—		1,851,210		(1,851,210	)	—		—	—
401(k) match	—		(11,183	)	11,183		—		—	—
Restricted stock	(6,000	)	—		(6,000	)	—		—	—

Balance, June 30, 2004	24,110,833		3,047,043		21,063,790		—		—	—

See accompanying notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, in the opinion of our Management, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial information. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

1. Background and Basis of Presentation - The consolidated financial statements of Commonwealth Telephone Enterprises, Inc. (“CTE,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) include the accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Commonwealth Telephone Company (“CT”), a rural incumbent local exchange carrier (“RLEC”); CTSI, LLC (“CTSI”), our RLEC edge-out operation and a competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”); Commonwealth Long Distance Company (“CLD”), a reseller of long-distance services; Commonwealth Communications (“CC”), a provider of telecommunications equipment and facilities management services; and epix (R) Internet Services (“epix”), that provides dial-up Internet services. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated.

For comparative purposes, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

2. Stock-Based Compensation - We apply the intrinsic value method of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation” (“FIN 44”) in accounting for our stock plans. We have adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”).

Pro forma amounts based on the options’ fair value, net of tax, at the grant dates for awards under the CTE Equity Incentive Plan for the three and six months ended 2004 and 2003, respectively, are:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Net income - as reported	$	16,318		$	15,214		$	30,883		$	43,398
Add: stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects		850			559			1,581			945
Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair-value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(1,515	)		(1,394	)		(2,960	)		(2,707	)

Net income - pro forma	$	15,653		$	14,379		$	29,504		$	41,636

Net income per share:
Basic earnings per share - as reported	$	0.77		$	0.65		$	1.42		$	1.85
Basic earnings per share - pro forma		0.74			0.61			1.36			1.77
Diluted earnings per share - as reported		0.76			0.64			1.41			1.83
Diluted earnings per share - pro forma		0.73			0.61			1.35			1.76

Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share has been determined as if we had accounted for our stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123.

3. Segment Information - We operate in two principal business segments: Commonwealth Telephone Company (“CT”), a rural incumbent local exchange carrier (“RLEC”); and CTSI, LLC (“CTSI”), our RLEC “edge-out” operation, which formally commenced operations in 1997.

The CT segment includes the results of CLD, a reseller of long-distance services and the portion of Jack Flash (R) (“Jack Flash”), the digital subscriber line (“DSL”) product offering in CT’s franchise area. CT provides local and long-distance telephone service and DSL service to residential and business customers in a 19-county service territory in rural northeastern and central Pennsylvania. CT also provides network access and billing/collection services to interexchange carriers and sells telecommunications products and services.

CTSI, which operates in three edge-out regional Pennsylvania markets that border CT’s territory, is a competitive local exchange carrier, offering bundled local and long-distance telephone, DSL and enhanced services.

The Other segment includes the results of CC, a provider of telecommunications equipment and facilities management services; epix which provides dial-up Internet service; and CTE’s corporate entity.

Operating income (loss) is the primary measure used by our management to assess the performance of each segment.

Financial information by business segment is as follows:

Three months ended June 30, 2004


	CT		CTSI			Other			Consolidated
Sales	$	61,491	$	20,836		$	6,315		$	88,642
Elimination of intersegment sales		4,566		56			6			4,628
External sales		56,925		20,780			6,309			84,014
Costs and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization and restructuring reversals		19,588		13,803			6,662			40,053
Depreciation and amortization		11,977		5,212			836			18,025
Restructuring reversals		—		(799	)		—			(799	)
Operating income (loss)		25,360		2,564			(1,189	)		26,735

Three months ended June 30, 2003


	CT		CTSI		Other			Consolidated
Sales	$	57,438	$	21,647	$	7,351		$	86,436
Elimination of intersegment sales		3,232		173		30			3,435
External sales		54,206		21,474		7,321			83,001
Costs and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization		19,293		13,827		7,205			40,325
Depreciation and amortization		11,523		5,109		877			17,509
Operating income (loss)		23,390		2,538		(761	)		25,167

Six months ended June 30, 2004


	CT		CTSI			Other			Consolidated
Sales	$	123,136	$	41,566		$	12,634		$	177,336
Elimination of intersegment sales		8,695		234			13			8,942
External sales		114,441		41,332			12,621			168,394
Costs and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization and restructuring reversals		39,052		27,607			13,781			80,440
Depreciation and amortization		23,670		10,301			1,661			35,632
Restructuring reversals		—		(799	)		—			(799	)
Operating income (loss)		51,719		4,223			(2,821	)		53,121

Six months ended June 30, 2003


	CT		CTSI		Other			Consolidated
Sales	$	115,176	$	43,314	$	14,316		$	172,806
Elimination of intersegment sales		6,249		345		53			6,647
External sales		108,927		42,969		14,263			166,159
Costs and expenses, excluding depreciation and amortization		38,849		27,111		14,192			80,152
Depreciation and amortization		23,211		10,169		1,756			35,136
Operating income (loss)		46,867		5,689		(1,685	)		50,871

The following table shows a reconciliation of operating income for the reportable business segments to income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Operating income from reportable segments	$	27,924		$	25,928		$	55,942		$	52,556
Other segment		(1,189	)		(761	)		(2,821	)		(1,685	)
Interest and dividend income		1,216			474			2,292			1,180
Interest expense		(4,325	)		(2,208	)		(8,812	)		(4,596	)
Other income (expense), net		502			(1,193	)		519			(1,158	)
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities		1,790			1,423			2,025			1,654

Consolidated income before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change	$	25,918		$	23,663		$	49,145		$	47,951

4. Revenue Recognition - Local telephone service is recorded based on tariffed or contracted rates. Telephone network access and long-distance revenues are derived from access charges, toll rates and settlement arrangements. CT’s interstate access charges are subject to a pooling process with the National Exchange Carrier Association (“NECA”). Final interstate revenues are based on nationwide average costs applied to certain demand quantities. Increases to CT’s reserve for doubtful accounts are charged against revenue. Internet access service revenues are based on contracted fees. Long-distance telephone service revenues are recorded based on minutes of traffic processed and tariffed rates or contracted fees. Revenue from local telephone, Internet access and long-distance telephone services is earned and recorded when the services are provided. Our revenues are also affected by the terms of our various carrier agreements by which certain interstate traffic is subject to a percent interstate usage (“PIU”) factor and certain intrastate traffic is subject to a percent local usage (“PLU”) factor. These factors may be updated based on actual traffic patterns. Revisions to the PIU and PLU factors could have an

impact (positive or negative) on our results of operations. Long-term contracts of CC are accounted for on the percentage-of-completion method. We defer and amortize CT, CTSI and epix installation revenue as well as direct incremental service installation costs over their respective estimated customer life. We carry in the Consolidated Balance Sheets deferred credits of $6,036 and $5,895 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, in other liabilities representing the unamortized portion of installation revenue. Additionally, we have deferred charges of $6,036 and $5,895 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, in other assets representing the unamortized portion of installation costs.

5. CTE Stock Options and Restricted Stock - As of June 30, 2004, we had approximately 1,205,000 options outstanding at exercise prices ranging from $11.097 to $54.3125. During the first six months of 2004, no options were granted, 500 options were canceled and 103,931 options were exercised, yielding cash proceeds of $2,751.

As provided for in the CTE Equity Incentive Plan, we granted 155,000 shares of restricted stock in 2000, of which 33,750 have been canceled. As of June 30, 2004, 121,250 shares were vested. The compensation cost related to restricted stock granted in 2000 was $554 and $665 in the six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In February, April, May and September of 2003 we granted an additional 162,125 shares of restricted stock that vest over four years, of which 14,500 have been canceled. As of June 30, 2004, 38,403 shares were vested. The compensation cost related to these issues of restricted stock was $716 and $460 in the six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In February and May of 2004, we granted an additional 161,550 shares of restricted stock units that vest over four years. The fair value of the restricted stock units issued of $6,666 to be recognized as compensation cost over the four year vesting period has been recognized as deferred compensation, shown as a separate reduction of shareholders’ equity. The compensation cost related to this issue of restricted stock units was $523 in the six month period ended June 30, 2004.

Pursuant to the 1997 Non-Management Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan, each non-employee director receives an annual grant of restricted common stock in the amount of 1,000 shares on the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. In September 2003, 9,000 shares were issued. The fair value of the restricted stock issued of $370 to be recognized as compensation cost over the one year vesting period has been recognized as deferred compensation. The compensation cost related to this issue of restricted stock was $185 in the six month period ended June 30, 2004. In May of 2004, we granted an additional 9,000 shares of restricted stock units. The fair value of the restricted stock units issued of $376 to be recognized as compensation cost over the one year vesting period has been recognized as deferred compensation. The compensation cost related to this issue of restricted stock units was $31 in the six month period ended June 30, 2004.

6. Earnings per Share - Basic earnings per share amounts are based on net income divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and Class B common stock outstanding during each period.

Diluted earnings per share amounts are based on net income divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and Class B common stock outstanding during each period after giving effect to dilutive common stock equivalents. Options that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods presented, were approximately 27,500 and 29,400 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and 37,400 and 50,400 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Should our convertible debt meet the required conditions for holders to be able to convert the debentures, the resulting shares would be included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. Also, the numerator will be adjusted to exclude (add back) the after-tax amount of interest recognized in the period associated with the convertible debt. Per SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS 128”), diluted earnings per share should be based on the most advantageous conversion rate from the standpoint of the holder. The computation of diluted earnings per share will also consider effects of anti-dilution and follow the requirements of SFAS 128 in this regard.

The following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations for net income:


	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	16,318	$	15,214	$	30,883	$	30,168
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—		—		—		13,230

Net income	$	16,318	$	15,214	$	30,883	$	43,398

Basic earnings per share:
Weighted average shares outstanding		21,207,371		23,515,230		21,674,971		23,476,185

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.77	$	0.65	$	1.42	$	1.29
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—		—		—		0.56

Net income per share	$	0.77	$	0.65	$	1.42	$	1.85

Diluted earnings per share:
Weighted average shares outstanding		21,207,371		23,515,230		21,674,971		23,476,185
Dilutive shares resulting from common stock equivalents		180,113		205,757		161,315		180,854

Weighted average shares and common stock equivalents outstanding		21,387,484		23,720,987		21,836,286		23,657,039

Income before cumulative effect of accounting change	$	0.76	$	0.64	$	1.41	$	1.27
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax		—		—		—		0.56

Net income per share	$	0.76	$	0.64	$	1.41	$	1.83

7. Derivative Instruments - We utilize interest rate swap agreements to reduce the impact of changes in interest rates on our floating rate debt. The swap agreements are contracts to exchange floating rate for fixed interest payments periodically over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amounts. The notional amounts of interest rate swap agreements are used to measure interest to be paid or received and do not represent the amount of exposure to credit loss. Amounts to be paid or received under interest rate swap agreements are accrued and recognized over the life of the swap agreements as an adjustment to interest expense.

The fair value of the interest rate swaps is recorded in other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The effective portion of interest rate swap gains or losses is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense. The ineffective portion, if any, is reported as other income (expense). In the six months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded an adjustment of ($1,766) (($1,149) net of tax) to adjust the fair value of the swaps to ($2,064). In the six months ended June 30, 2003, we recorded an adjustment of ($691) (($449) net of tax) to adjust the fair value of the swaps to ($5,650).

8. Restructuring Charges (Reversals) - In December 2000 we announced our intention to exit five CTSI expansion markets: suburban Philadelphia, PA; Binghamton, NY; Charleston/Huntington, WV; and Youngstown, OH. Related to this,

we recorded an estimated restructuring charge of $99,713 ($64,813 after-tax), or ($2.79) (after-tax) per common share (including effects of anti-dilutive options). This strategy was aimed at focusing on the three “edge-out” markets adjacent to CT’s rural footprint. These edge-out markets encompass the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton/Hazleton, Harrisburg and Lancaster/Reading/York, PA markets.

The key elements of the restructuring charge recorded in December 2000 were:


	Employee Termination Benefits		Contract Terminations		Assets, Disposal and Removal Costs		Other		Total
Employee termination benefits	$	2,628							$	2,628
Contract terminations and settlements			$	15,294						15,294
Removal and restoration costs					$	2,286				2,286
Write-down of assets						76,005				76,005
Investment advisory and other fees							$	3,500		3,500

Total restructuring charges	$	2,628	$	15,294	$	78,291	$	3,500	$	99,713

Of the total restructuring charge, $2,628 related to employee termination benefits for personnel reductions at CTSI in major operational functions and also certain corporate staff reductions. Under the restructuring plan, approximately 220 employee positions were eliminated during December 2000; and as of December 31, 2001, we reduced our workforce by an additional 33 employees who had remained to facilitate the transition of customers to other service providers. No further workforce reductions as a result of this restructuring will occur. Incremental costs related to financial advisory, legal and other fees were estimated to be $3,500. Additionally, other exit costs for the termination of contractual obligations, building and circuit lease terminations, asset removal and site restorations were estimated to be $17,580.

The restructuring charge included $73,994, net of estimated salvage value, for the write-down of assets included in property, plant and equipment. Estimated salvage values were based on estimates of proceeds from the sale of the affected assets, offset by costs of removal. These assets primarily related to switching, central office equipment and outside communications plant physically located in the exited markets. The restructuring charge also included $2,011 related to the write-down of inventory to be sold or disposed of.

In the six months ended June 2004, $607 of our remaining liability was reversed due to a settlement of a customer claim associated with the assignment of customers to another CLEC, and $131 of our liability was paid. Also, assets held on consignment by a third-party reseller were sold, returning a gain of $192. Our liability remaining at June 30, 2004, was $74.

The write-down of the assets to be disposed of was a direct result of our unwillingness to incur the capital requirements necessary to grow these markets and make them profitable; and accordingly, no future cash flows from these assets could be anticipated. Excluding the items included in the restructuring charge, we are not aware of any events or circumstances that would suggest the carrying amount of our remaining assets would not be recoverable.

Accrued restructuring expense comprises the following:


	Provision		Payments			Balance December 31, 2000		Payments			Reversal of Provision			Balance December 31, 2001		Payments			Reversal of Provision
Employee termination benefits	$	2,628	$	(1,572	)	$	1,056	$	(962	)	$	(94	)	$	—	$	—		$	—
Contract terminations and settlements		15,294		—			15,294		(5,150	)		(3,788	)		6,356		(1,361	)		(2,966	)
Removal and restoration costs		2,286		—			2,286		(1,063	)		(770	)		453		(10	)		(443	)
Investment advisory and other fees		3,500		(311	)		3,189		(1,017	)		(1,600	)		572		(41	)		(531	)

Total accrued restructuring expense	$	23,708	$	(1,883	)	$	21,825	$	(8,192	)	$	(6,252	)	$	7,381	$	(1,412	)	$	(3,940	)


	Balance December 31, 2002		Payments			Reversal of Provision			Balance December 31, 2003		Payments			Reversal of Provision			Balance June 30, 2004
Employee termination benefits	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—
Contract terminations and settlements		2,029		(427	)		(790	)		812		(131	)		(607	)		74
Removal and restoration costs		—		—			—			—		—			—			—
Investment advisory and other fees		—		—			—			—		—			—			—

Total accrued restructuring expense	$	2,029	$	(427	)	$	(790	)	$	812	$	(131	)	$	(607	)	$	74

9. Change in Accounting and New Accounting Pronouncements -

Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 -

On January 12, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-1, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (“FSP 106-1”). The FSP permits employers that sponsor postretirement benefit plans that provide prescription drug benefits to retirees to make a one-time election to defer accounting for any effects of the Act, until the earlier of: (a) the issuance of guidance by the FASB on how to account for the federal subsidy to be provided to plan sponsors under the Act; or (b) the remeasurement of plan assets and obligations subsequent to January 31, 2004.

On May 19, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (“FSP 106-2”). FSP 106-2 provides guidance on accounting for the effects of the new Medicare prescription drug legislation by employers whose prescription drug benefits are actuarially equivalent to the drug benefit under Medicare Part D. After review of our Plans’ provisions, it has been determined that we are not entitled to the subsidy as prescription drug benefits are not available to retirees upon reaching age 65.

10. Common Stock - We have authorized 85,000,000 shares of $1 par value CTE Common Stock at June 30, 2004 and 2003. At June 30, 2003, we had authorized 15,000,000 shares of $1 par value CTE Class B Common Stock. On September 3, 2003, shareholders approved a proposal to reclassify and convert each outstanding share of CTE Class B Common Stock into 1.09 shares of CTE Common Stock. We now have only one class of common stock.

We announced a $100 million Stock Repurchase Program on November 13, 2003, and a $50 million addition to the program on February 10, 2004. As of June 30, 2004, we had repurchased a total of 3,030,410 shares under the program, with an average purchase price of $38.88, for a total all-in cost of approximately $117.8 million. As of December 31, 2003, we had repurchased 1,179,200 shares.

11. Pension -

Pension cost is as follows:


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Service cost	$	806		$	713		$	1,716		$	1,426
Interest cost		1,346			1,308			2,692			2,616
Expected return on plan assets		(1,643	)		(1,454	)		(3,286	)		(2,908	)
Amortization of net (asset) obligation		—			(124	)		—			(248	)
Amortization of prior service cost		131			131			262			262
Recognized net actuarial loss		34			120			68			240

Total net periodic pension cost	$	674		$	694		$	1,452		$	1,388

We will make a required minimum contribution to the plan of approximately $2,070 in September 2004 for the 2003 plan year with cash generated from operations.

For employees who retired prior to 1993, we provide certain postretirement medical benefits. We also provide nominal postretirement life insurance benefits to all vested retirees. The interest cost was $12 and $18 for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and $24 and $36 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The amortization of prior service cost was $0 and $3 for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and $0 and $6 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The recognized net actuarial gain was ($27) and ($25) for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and ($54) and ($50) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The total net periodic postretirement benefit was ($15) and ($4) for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and ($30) and ($8) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

For former employees included in the Voluntary Retirement Program, we provide medical benefits until age 65. The interest cost was $9 and $13 for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and $18 and $26 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The recognized net actuarial gain was ($12) and ($15) for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and ($24) and ($30) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The total net periodic postretirement benefit was ($3) and ($2) for the quarters ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and ($6) and ($4) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

12. Commitments and Contingencies - In February 2004, Verizon Pennsylvania filed a Petition for Resolution of a Dispute with the Pennsylvania PUC, seeking a refund and/or credits for approximately $7.9 million in facilities charges that CTSI billed to Verizon over a two-year period. In addition, CTSI has filed a civil action against Verizon Pennsylvania in the Court of Common Pleas for Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, seeking damages in the amount of approximately $7.9 million relating to the same dispute. Various pleadings have been filed by both parties at the PUC as well as at the Court of Common Pleas with regard to which venue has proper jurisdiction over this matter, but we cannot predict the timing or outcome of these proceedings at this time. We believe, based on our estimate of the probable outcome, that we are adequately reserved for the resolution of this dispute.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act and we intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to these safe harbors. These statements are generally accompanied by words such as “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect” or similar statements. Our forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect expected results in the future differently than expressed in any forward-looking statements we have made. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

•

uncertainties relating to our ability to further penetrate our markets and the related cost of that effort;

•

economic conditions, acquisitions and divestitures;

•

government and regulatory policies;

•

the pricing and availability of equipment, materials and inventories;

•

technological developments;

•

reductions in rates or traffic that is subject to access charges;

•

changes in the competitive environment in which we operate; and

•

the receipt of necessary approvals.

Although we believe that the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, we cannot provide any assurance that the results contemplated in such forward-looking statements will be realized. The inclusion of this forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the future events, plans or expectations that we contemplate will be achieved. Furthermore, past performance in operations and share price is not necessarily predictive of future performance. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the attached Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto and with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

Overview and Segments

Our two primary operations are Commonwealth Telephone Company, or CT, which is a rural incumbent local exchange carrier (“RLEC”), and CTSI, LLC, (“CTSI”) our RLEC edge-out operation and a competitive local exchange carrier (“CLEC”). The CT segment includes the results of Commonwealth Long Distance Company (“CLD”), a long-distance reseller; and the portion of Jack Flash(R) (“Jack Flash”), our broadband data service that uses DSL technology to offer high-speed Internet access and digital connectivity solutions, that is in CT’s territory. Our “Other” segment, which is comprised of telecommunications-related businesses that all operate in the deregulated segments of the telecommunications industry and support the operations of our two primary operating companies, includes epix(R) Internet Services (“epix”), a rural Internet service provider; and Commonwealth Communications (“CC”), a provider of telecommunications equipment and facilities management services. Other also includes our corporate entity.

CT has been operating in various rural Pennsylvania markets since 1897. As of June 30, 2004, our RLEC served over 336,400 switched access lines. In 1997, we formally launched our facilities-based RLEC edge-out operation, CTSI. CTSI

operates in three “edge-out” regional Pennsylvania markets that border CT’s markets and that, we believe, offer attractive market demographics, such as higher population density and a higher concentration of businesses.

CTSI served over 139,300 switched access lines as of June 30, 2004, which were mainly business customers. In late 2002, CTSI announced the extension of its existing business operations into select areas of Pennsylvania’s Lehigh Valley. We view this opportunity as an extension of our current Central market (Lancaster/Reading/York), rather than the establishment of a fourth regional market.

Revenue

CT’s revenue is derived primarily from access, local service, enhanced services, local long-distance (intraLATA toll), long-distance service revenue and Jack Flash DSL. Access revenue consists primarily of charges paid by long-distance companies and other telecommunications carriers for access to our network in connection with the completion of long-distance telephone calls. Local service revenue consists of charges for local exchange telephone services, including monthly tariffs for basic local service. Enhanced services revenue is derived from service for special calling features, including, but not limited to, Caller ID and Call Waiting. Local long-distance (intraLATA toll) and long-distance revenues consist of charges for such services paid by CT’s customers. Jack Flash DSL revenue consists of charges for high-speed Internet access and digital connectivity solutions provided to CT’s customers.

CTSI’s revenue is derived primarily from access, local service, competitive access, Internet access from dedicated and Jack Flash DSL, local long-distance (intraLATA toll) and long-distance service revenue. Access revenue consists primarily of charges paid by long-distance companies and other non-CLEC customers for access to our network in connection with the completion of long-distance telephone and local calls and the delivery of other services. Access revenue also includes recurring trunking revenue and reciprocal compensation. Local service revenue consists of charges for local exchange telephone services, including monthly recurring charges for basic services and special calling features. Competitive access revenue consists of charges for point-to-point connections. Internet access revenue consists of charges for dedicated Internet access provided to CTSI customers. Jack Flash DSL revenue consists of charges for high-speed Internet access and digital connectivity solutions provided to CTSI customers. Long-distance revenue consists of charges for long-distance service paid by CTSI customers.

Our “Other” business segment includes the revenue from epix and Commonwealth Communications. epix revenue for this segment consists primarily of dial-up Internet access revenue. Commonwealth Communications generates revenue primarily from telecommunications projects, including installation of telephone systems for business customers, cabling projects and telecommunications systems design.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Our operating costs and expenses for each of our segments primarily include access charges and other direct costs of sales, payroll and related benefits, selling and advertising, software and information system services, general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization. These costs have increased over time as we have grown our operations and revenues. CTSI also incurs additional costs related to leased local loop charges associated with providing last mile access, circuit rentals, engineering costs, colocation expense, terminating access for local calls and long-distance expense. CC also incurs expenses primarily related to equipment and materials used in the course of the installation and provisioning of service.

Capital Expenditures

We incur capital expenditures associated with expenditures for upgrading existing facilities and costs related to the provisioning of DSL services in CT and CTSI territories. In addition, at CTSI, capital expenditures associated with access line installations, comprising a significant portion of its overall

capital spending, are success-based and therefore result in incremental revenue.

Results of Operations

Three months ended June 30, 2004 vs June 30, 2003

Our consolidated sales were $84,014 and $83,001 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Contributing to the sales increase of $1,013 or 1.2% were higher sales of CT of $2,719, partially offset by a decline in CTSI sales of $694 and a decline in Other sales of $1,012.

Our consolidated operating costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization and restructuring reversals) were $40,053 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $40,325 for the three months ended June 30, 2003, a decrease of $272.

Consolidated operating income was $26,735 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $25,167 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The increase of $1,568 was a result of the items discussed above and a positive settlement of $799 associated with our 2000 restructuring charge, partially offset by increased consolidated depreciation expense of $516.

Consolidated net income was $16,318 or $0.76 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Net income was $15,214 or $0.64 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Contributing to the increase in net income is the increase in operating income discussed above, an increase in other income (expense) due to a charge in 2003 of $1,450 associated with the Recapitalization Transaction (discussed on page 25) that did not recur in 2004 and an increase in interest income, partially offset by an increase in interest expense primarily due to our issuance of convertible notes in July 2003 and an increase in the provision for income taxes.

Six months ended June 30, 2004 vs June 30, 2003

Our consolidated sales were $168,394 and $166,159 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Contributing to the sales increase of $2,235 or 1.3% were higher sales of CT of $5,514, partially offset by a decline in CTSI sales of $1,637 and a decline in Other sales of $1,642.

Our consolidated operating costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization and restructuring reversals) were $80,440 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $80,152 for the six months ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $288.

Other operating expenses decreased $303 as a result of a positive settlement of $799 associated with our 2000 restructuring charge, partially offset by increased consolidated depreciation expense of $496.

Consolidated operating income was $53,121 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $50,871 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The increase of $2,250 was a result of the items discussed above.

Consolidated net income was $30,883 or $1.41 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Net income was $43,398 or $1.83 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2003, including a cumulative effect accounting adjustment of $13,230 or $0.56 per share associated with the adoption of SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” Also contributing to the decrease in net income is the increase in interest expense primarily due to our issuance of convertible notes in July 2003, partially offset by the increase in operating income discussed above, an increase in other income (expense) due to a charge in 2003 of $1,450 associated with the Recapitalization Transaction that did not recur in 2004 and an increase in interest income.

Selected Segment Data

DATA TABLES

We have included certain segment financial data in the tables below. Operating income (loss) is the primary measure used by our management to assess the performance of each segment.

Three months ended June 30, 2004


	Sales		Costs and expenses excluding depreciation and amortization		Depreciation and amortization		Restructuring reversals			Operating income (loss)
CT	$	56,925	$	19,588	$	11,977	$	—		$	25,360
CTSI		20,780		13,803		5,212		(799	)		2,564
Other		6,309		6,662		836		—			(1,189	)

Total	$	84,014	$	40,053	$	18,025	$	(799	)	$	26,735

Three months ended June 30, 2003


	Sales		Costs and expenses excluding depreciation and amortization		Depreciation and amortization		Operating income (loss)
CT	$	54,206	$	19,293	$	11,523	$	23,390
CTSI		21,474		13,827		5,109		2,538
Other		7,321		7,205		877		(761	)

Total	$	83,001	$	40,325	$	17,509	$	25,167

Six months ended June 30, 2004


	Sales		Costs and expenses excluding depreciation and amortization		Depreciation and amortization		Restructuring reversals			Operating income (loss)
CT	$	114,441	$	39,052	$	23,670	$	—		$	51,719
CTSI		41,332		27,607		10,301		(799	)		4,223
Other		12,621		13,781		1,661		—			(2,821	)

Total	$	168,394	$	80,440	$	35,632	$	(799	)	$	53,121

Six months ended June 30, 2003


	Sales		Costs and expenses excluding depreciation and amortization		Depreciation and amortization		Operating income (loss)
CT	$	108,927	$	38,849	$	23,211	$	46,867
CTSI		42,969		27,111		10,169		5,689
Other		14,263		14,192		1,756		(1,685	)

Total	$	166,159	$	80,152	$	35,136	$	50,871

Installed access lines:


	June 30,
	2004	2003
CT	336,446	338,340
CTSI	139,316	135,035

Total	475,762	473,375

Commonwealth Telephone Company

Sales were $56,925 and $54,206 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The sales increase of $2,719 or 5.0% is primarily due to higher access, enhanced services and DSL revenues. The increase in sales is primarily due to the growth in access revenue resulting from an increase in the NECA average schedule formulas and units which drive settlements and an increase in special access circuits.

CT’s residential lines declined as additional lines were disconnected from customers switching to DSL and other high-speed products and a decline in primary residential lines, partially offset by an increase in sales of business lines.

On December 31, 2003, in compliance with an order issued by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, we implemented the mandatory phase of State Access Reform. The order required CT, along with certain other local exchange carriers, to reduce the access rates it charges other carriers which originate or terminate intrastate long-distance calls to CT’s customers. These reductions were matched by revenue neutral increases in rates charged to CT’s basic telephone customers. Although the intent of the State Access Reform is for there to be no direct impact on CT’s revenues because of the revenue neutral mechanism, the increases in monthly per-line rates may reduce demand among CT’s customers for additional lines and other services.

CT’s sales were $114,441 and $108,927 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The sales increase of $5,514 or 5.1% is primarily due to higher access, enhanced services and DSL revenues.

Interstate access revenue increased $1,773 and $3,597 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, versus the comparable period of 2003, resulting from an increase in the NECA average schedule formulas and units that drive settlements and an increase in special access circuits.

State access revenue decreased $1,308 and $ 2,677 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the comparable period of 2003, primarily as a result of the State Access Reform rate decrease and a decrease in minutes of use.

Local service revenue increased $655 and $1,388 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, as compared to the same period last year, primarily as a result of the State Access Reform rate increase.

Enhanced services revenue increased $656 and $1,310 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 in comparison to the same period last year primarily as a result of the State Access Reform price increase and increases in custom calling, Caller ID and certain other enhanced services sales.

IntraLATA toll and long-distance revenues decreased $8 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the comparable period of 2003, due to lower market share in CT intraLATA toll due to customers selecting alternate lower cost service providers and calling packages offered by several non-wireline providers in certain areas of CT’s territory, decreasing revenue by $758, a trend we expect to continue. The decline was offset by an increase in revenue of $783 due to a long-distance product offering which began in early 2003. IntraLATA toll and long-distance revenues increased $157 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the comparable period of 2003, due primarily to the long-distance product offering increasing revenue by $1,727, partially offset by the declining toll market and declining market share decreasing revenue by $1,528.

Other revenue increased $949 and $1,741 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 in comparison to the same period last year primarily as a result of an increase in DSL subscribers.

Costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization) for the three months ended June 30, 2004 were $19,588 as compared to $19,293 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization) were $39,052 as compared to $38,849 for the six months ended June 30, 2003, an increase of $203 or .5%. The increase in expenses was primarily due to an increase in pole attachments and higher rates of $323 and $393 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004, respectively; higher costs related to our new long-distance product offering including higher bad debt expense; and higher other operating tax expense of $143 and $201 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. These higher costs were partially offset by lower terminating access expense due to CT’s declining market share.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $454 or 3.9% to $11,977 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, depreciation and amortization expense increased $459 to $23,670. The change was a result of capital expenditures in 2003 and 2004, partially offset by changes in CT’s overall composite rate.

CT’s operating income was $25,360 and $23,390 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, an increase of $1,970 or 8.4%. CT’s operating income increased $4,852 or 10.4% to $51,719 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The increases were a result of the items discussed above.

CTSI, LLC

CTSI sales were $20,780 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $21,474 for the same period in 2003. The decrease of $694 or 3.2% primarily represents a decrease in access revenue of $1,696, partially offset by an increase in local service of $425, from installed access lines; and increases in long-distance of $148, customer point-to-point circuit revenues of $141 and Jack Flash DSL and Internet revenues of $134.

The FCC rate ceilings, as further described in the Legislative and Regulatory Developments section, will result in reductions in the revenues CTSI receives from interstate access charges. In addition, continued industry-wide trends towards declining usage of dial-up Internet access and of wire-line long-distance services generally, will have a negative impact on these revenues. CTSI’s revenues from access charges and reciprocal compensation are also affected by the mix of traffic delivered to it by other carriers for termination to CTSI customers. In late 2003, Verizon notified CTSI of a reduction in the proportion of its delivered traffic that will be subject to intrastate access charges, and a corresponding increase in the proportion that will be subject

to local reciprocal compensation rates based on a revised Percent Local Usage (PLU) factor. Because the reciprocal compensation rates are much lower than access charges, this change in traffic mix negatively affected CTSI’s revenues by approximately $700 per month in the second quarter 2004.

For the three months ended June 30, 2004, CTSI recorded approximately $1,505 or 7.2% of its revenues from compensation revenue associated with Internet service provider (“ISP”) traffic, as compared to $3,315 or 15.4% for the same period last year. As was the case in 2003, all of the allowable billable minutes on local ISP reciprocal compensation above the 3 to 1 ratio available to be billed in 2004 were billed in the first quarter.

CTSI derives a substantial portion of its revenues directly and indirectly from ISPs. We expect that this reliance will continue in the foreseeable future. ISPs represented approximately 16.0% and 24.2% of CTSI’s revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. This percentage has decreased as a result of our approximately $700 per month reduction in revenue from our revised PLU factor with Verizon. These high-margin revenues include services provided directly to the ISP including local and cap-type services and indirect services including reciprocal compensation and trunking from Verizon as a result of Verizon’s customers calling these ISPs. Industry-wide trends towards declining usage of dial-up Internet access may threaten the profitability or viability of our ISP customers. If we lose a significant number of these customers that are providing Internet services, or if a significant portion of these customers are unable to pay amounts owed to us, our financial results could be negatively impacted.

The decrease in revenue was partially offset by the increase in local service. At June 30, 2004, CTSI had 139,316 installed access lines versus 135,035 installed access lines at June 30, 2003, an increase of 4,281 or 3.2%. Additionally, the increase in point-to-point circuit revenue is due to Internet and cellular providers using our circuits to allow their networks to tie into the public switched network system.

Sequentially, in the quarter, CTSI saw its first ever decline in net lines installed, as CTSI’s base of access lines eroded by 1,087 lines. CTSI’s line weakness in the second quarter is attributed to an increased level of competitive response in the marker place. Competitors appear to be pricing and promoting their service offerings more aggressively, including offering shorter-term contracts. We are diligently working to combat the increased churn we saw in the quarter, and will monitor churn closely in the weeks and months ahead. However, our efforts will take a period of time to implement.

CTSI sales were $41,332 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $42,969 for the same period in 2003. The decrease of $1,637 or 3.8% primarily represents a decrease in access revenue of $3,642. The FCC rate ceilings will result in reductions in revenues that CTSI receives from interstate access charges. In addition, continued industry-wide trends towards declining usage of dial-up Internet access and of wire-line long-distance services generally, will have a negative impact on these revenues.

For the six months ended June 30, 2004, CTSI recorded approximately $3,277 or 7.9% of its revenues from compensation revenue associated with ISP traffic, as compared to $7,179 or 16.7% for the same period last year.

CTSI derives a substantial portion of its revenues directly and indirectly from ISPs. ISPs represented approximately 17.2% and 25.3% of CTSI’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. This percentage has decreased as a result of our approximately $700 per month reduction in revenue from our revised PLU factor with Verizon.

The decrease in revenue was partially offset by an increase in local service of $954. Additionally, the increase in point-to-point circuit revenue of $216 is due to Internet and cellular providers using our circuits to allow their networks to tie into the public switched network system. The decrease in revenue was also partially offset by increases in long-distance of $340 and Jack Flash DSL and Internet revenues of $363.

Costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization and restructuring reversals) were $13,803 and $13,827 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Contributing to the decrease in expenses are reductions in collocate power requirements and a reduction in headcount.

For the six months ended June 30, 2004, costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization and restructuring reversals) were $27,607 as compared to $27,111 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Contributing to the increase in expenses of $496 are leased local loop charges of $389 and an increase in long-distance minutes of $140, partially offset by a reduction in collocate power requirements of $103.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $103 or 2.0% to $5,212 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, depreciation and amortization expense increased $132 to $10,301. The change was a result of capital expenditures in 2003 and 2004, partially offset by changes in CTSI’s overall composite rate.

Restructuring reversals were $799 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 as a result of a positive settlement associated with our 2000 restructuring charge.

CTSI’s operating income was $2,564 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $2,538 for the three months ended June 30, 2003. CTSI’s operating income was $4,223 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to $5,689 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The changes were a result of the items discussed above.

Other

Sales of our support businesses were $6,309 and $7,321 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease of $1,012 or 13.8% is due to a decrease in CC and epix sales.

CC sales decreased $688 or 15.3% to $3,810 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, primarily due to a decrease in drop shipments, a decrease in business systems upgrade sales and lower communications facilities management services. epix sales decreased $324 or 11.5% to $2,499 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, due to a decrease in dial-up subscribers as customers move to DSL or other high-speed products or providers.

For the six months ended June 30, 2004, sales of our support businesses were $12,621 as compared to $14,263 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The decrease of $1,642 or 11.5% is due to a decrease in CC sales of $1,066 or 12.4% and decreased epix sales of $576 or 10.1%.

Costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization) of our support businesses were $6,662 and $7,205 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. CC costs and expenses decreased $559 to $3,454 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, as compared to the same period last year, due primarily to a decrease in sales. epix expenses decreased $246 to $1,837 for the three months ended June 30, 2004, in comparison to the same period last year as a result of a reduction in the number of people focused on epix and lower transport costs. This decrease in costs was partially offset by an increase in corporate costs due primarily to higher restricted stock amortization.

For the six months ended June 30, 2004, costs and expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization) of our support businesses were $13,781 as compared to $14,192 for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Expenses at the corporate entity decreased primarily due to certain expenses related to the Recapitalization Transaction in 2003 that did not recur, partially offset by higher restricted stock amortization. epix expenses decreased $564 to $3,801 for the six months ended June 30, 2004, in comparison to the same period last year as a result of a reduction in the number of people focused on epix and lower transport costs. CC costs and expenses increased $219 to $6,943 for the six months ended June 30, 2004, in comparison to the same period last year, primarily as a result of a favorable settlement of an outstanding project dispute of $965 in 2003, partially offset by a decrease in costs due to a decrease in sales.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $41 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, depreciation and amortization expense decreased $95. The change was due to a smaller base of depreciable plant.

The operating loss in Other was ($1,189) for the three months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to ($761) for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The operating loss in Other was ($2,821) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to ($1,685) for the six months ended June 30, 2003. The changes were a result of the items discussed above.

Interest and Dividend Income

Consolidated interest and dividend income was $1,216 and $474 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively; this represents an increase of $742 or 156.5% from the comparable period of 2003. Consolidated interest and dividend income was $2,292 and $1,180 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively; an increase of $1,112 or 94.2% from the comparable period of 2003. The increase in interest and dividend income is primarily the result of the higher investment balances as a result of proceeds received from the $300,000 convertible notes offering in July 2003.

Interest Expense

Interest expense includes interest on our convertible notes, CT’s mortgage note payable to CoBank, ACB (“CoBank”), interest on revolving credit facilities in 2003 and amortization of debt issuance costs. We used interest rate swaps on $50,000 of floating rate debt to hedge against interest rate exposure. Consolidated interest expense was $4,325 and $2,208 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively; this represents an increase of $2,117 or 95.9% from the comparable period of 2003. Consolidated interest expense was $8,812 and $4,596 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively; this represents an increase of $4,216 or 91.7% from the comparable period of 2003. The net increase in interest expense is a result of our issuance of convertible notes in July 2003.

Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rates were 37.0% and 35.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, our effective income tax rates were 37.2% and 37.1%, respectively. In December 2002, we reorganized our legal entity structure to allow the state of Pennsylvania tax losses of CLD and epix to be offset against state taxable income of CT. Also, we are utilizing various tax strategies to provide effective state income tax planning.

Liquidity and Capital Resources:


	June 30, 2004		December 31, 2003
Cash and temporary cash investments	$	264,163	$	336,035
Working capital		208,084		251,788
Long-term debt (including current maturities, notes payable and capital lease obligations)		351,442		396,380

On July 18, 2003, we sold $300,000 of 3.25% convertible notes due 2023. The net proceeds from this offering, in addition to cash generated from operations, are being and will be used for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. In addition, other uses of cash may include potential acquisitions, new product offerings, debt retirement and common stock repurchases. While we do not presently intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock, we may decide to pay such dividends in the future. The payment of any cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors. The declaration of any cash dividends and the amount thereof will depend on a number of factors, including our financial condition, capital requirements, funds from operations, the dividend taxation level, our stock price, future business prospects and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant. Additionally, other indebtedness we incur may place significant restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

On July 1, 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board reached a tentative conclusion on “Accounting Issues Related to Certain Features of Contingently Convertible Debt and the Effect on Diluted Earnings per Share” (“EITF 04-8”), which would require all shares that are contingently issuable under our convertible debt instrument be included in our calculations of diluted earnings per share (see Note 6). Assuming conversion at the current conversion price, the debt would be convertible to 5,263,170 shares of common stock. Currently, we would only include the shares contingently issuable under our convertible notes in our calculation of diluted earnings per share if the share price of our common stock exceeds the conversion trigger prices specified in this debt instrument. Therefore, adoption by the FASB of this conclusion would negatively impact our reported earnings per share retroactively and in future periods.

We announced a $100 million Stock Repurchase Program on November 13, 2003, and a $50 million addition to the program on February 10, 2004. The Stock Repurchase Program has no time limit. As of June 30, 2004, we had repurchased a total of 3,030,410 shares under the program with an average purchase price of $38.88, for a total all-in cost of approximately $117.8 million.

We have the following financing arrangements in place:


	June 30, 2004				June 30, 2003
	Balance		Available		Balance		Available
Revolving credit facility*	$	—	$	—	$	5,000	$	235,000
Credit agreement - CoBank		—		—		51,805		—
Revolving line of credit - CoBank		50,000		15,000		65,000		—
Convertible notes		300,000		—		—		—

Total	$	350,000	$	15,000	$	121,805	$	235,000

*	This facility was terminated on July 17, 2003.

Cash and temporary cash investments were $264,163 at June 30, 2004 as compared to $336,035 at December 31, 2003. For purposes of reporting cash flows, we consider all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be temporary cash investments. Temporary cash investments are investments in high quality, diversified money market mutual funds. We monitor fund performance of money market mutual funds available to us on a quarterly basis to maximize returns and insure investment quality. Our working capital ratio was 2.55 to 1 at June 30, 2004 as compared to 2.56 to 1 at December 31, 2003. The net decrease is due to a decrease in cash of $71,872 primarily due to the Stock Repurchase Program and repayment of debt, partially offset by cash generated from operations. This was partially offset by a reduction in current liabilities due to the repayment of debt.


	As of June 30,
	2004			2003
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	62,344		$	54,769
Investing activities		(17,585	)		(16,777	)
Financing activities		(116,631	)		(26,241	)

For the six months ended June 30, 2004, our net cash provided by operating activities was $62,344 comprised of net income of $30,883, non-cash depreciation and amortization of $35,632 and a reduction in other non-cash items and working capital changes of $4,171. Net cash used in investing activities of $17,585 consisted primarily of additions to property, plant and equipment of $19,921. Net cash used in financing activities of $116,631 consisted primarily of stock repurchases of $74,362 and net redemption of debt of $44,521, partially offset by proceeds of stock option exercises of $2,751.

We have a $65,000 revolving line of credit with CoBank. $15,000 of this line of credit was paid in June 2004, with a $50,000 balance outstanding. This agreement contains restrictive covenants which, among other things, requires the maintenance of a specific debt to cash flow ratio at CT. As of June 30, 2004, we were in compliance with our covenants. The revolving line of credit agreement provides for the availability of credit to May 2005. We may refinance all or a portion of this line of credit when it becomes due in May 2005.

To take advantage of our favorable cash position, in the second quarter of 2004 we paid the remaining balance on our credit agreement with CoBank.

We expect to have adequate resources to meet our currently foreseeable obligations and development plans for our CTSI markets and customer demand for additional capacity and service. In addition to cash generated from operations, sources of funding for any additional capital requirements or acquisitions may include financing from public offerings or private placements of equity and/or debt securities and bank loans. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us or, if available, that it can be obtained on

a timely basis and on acceptable terms. Failure to obtain such financing could result in the delay or curtailment of our development plans and expenditures.

Related and Like Parties

On April 24, 2003, the Company entered into a Recapitalization Agreement (the “Recapitalization Agreement”) with Level 3 Communications, Inc. (“Level 3”) and Eldorado Equity Holdings, Level 3’s indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary. Under the terms of the Recapitalization Agreement, the Company agreed to amend its existing charter to (i) reclassify and convert each outstanding share of CTE Class B Common Stock into 1.09 shares of CTE Common Stock and (ii) eliminate from the existing charter the CTE Class B Common Stock, and all provisions related thereto, and certain miscellaneous inoperative provisions. Level 3 agreed, pursuant to the terms of the Recapitalization Agreement, to vote its shares in favor of the reclassification and the related charter amendments. At the Annual Meeting held on September 3, 2003, shareholders approved the proposal to reclassify and convert each outstanding share of CTE Class B Common Stock into 1.09 shares of CTE Common Stock. CTE now has only one class of common stock, with each share having one vote in corporate governance matters. As a result of the reclassification, Level 3’s ownership was reduced to approximately 4.6% of the outstanding CTE Common Stock and correspondingly approximately 4.6% of the voting power.

On January 21, 2004, Level 3 announced that it had privately-negotiated a sale of its remaining 1,108,596 shares of CTE Common Stock. In connection with this transaction, certain registration rights were assigned by Level 3 to the purchaser.

Four of our directors are also directors of Level 3. Our non-management Chairman, Walter Scott, Jr., is also the Chairman of Level 3. We may enter into transactions with Level 3 which will be negotiated at arm’s length.

Legislative and Regulatory Developments

Commonwealth Telephone Company

Prices for CT’s (our RLEC) local and in-state long-distance services are regulated by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”). These prices are currently set under an alternative regulation plan, which the PUC approved in 1997. Under this plan, among other things, CT is protected by an exogenous events provision that recognizes and accounts for any state/federal regulatory, legislative changes or other unique changes in the telephone industry that affect revenues or expenses, thereby allowing CT to adjust rates to compensate for changes in revenues and/or expenses due to such exogenous events.

The state law authorizing this alternative form of regulation for CT and other incumbent local exchange carriers, or LECs, in Pennsylvania expired on December 31, 2003. The Pennsylvania legislature to date has not taken action to extend the PUC’s power to maintain alternative regulation, but is considering legislation to reinstate this power. Representatives of CT have been actively involved in the legislative process, both individually and through our membership in various industry organizations, to renew the legislation. We believe that CT’s alternative regulation plan remains valid, because it was approved by the PUC under the law that was in effect at the time of approval, but this is an unsettled area of the law. The PUC has also asserted that all Chapter 30 plans (including CT’s) remain valid. At this time we are unable to predict the outcome of these developments or their potential effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

The alternative regulation plan permits CT to increase its overall rates for regulated intrastate services annually by an amount equal to inflation minus 2.0 percent. In periods of very low inflation, as during the past few years, this formula may require rate decreases. In 2003, the PUC approved a plan amendment that permits CT to defer these rate reductions for up to four years and offset them against future increases (if any). In accordance with our Chapter 30 Plan, we have recently submitted filings to the PUC to reflect the most recent impacts of inflation less the productivity offset as well as the effect of rate reductions that have been implemented for traffic

terminated from several national wireless carriers. As a result of the wireless rate reductions, CT has satisfied the requirement to adjust rates for previously deferred decreases. CT remains liable to purchasers of CT’s services for the additional revenues received during the time period that the rate decreases were actually deferred. These amounts could be satisfied if CT were to defer a rate increase in the future or actually return these amounts to customers via a one-time refund or a temporary rate decrease.

On July 10, 2003, the PUC issued an order addressing intrastate access reform and Universal Service Funding (“USF”) reform for independent local exchange carriers in Pennsylvania. The order provides for continuation of intrastate USF funding to CT until completion of a future rulemaking proceeding by the PUC, which must be commenced no later than December 31, 2004, but which may not be completed until much later. The order also requires CT to reduce the access rates it charges to other carriers which originate or terminate intrastate long-distance calls to CT’s customers, in two phases, a mandatory first phase in 2003 and an optional second phase in 2004. We successfully completed the mandatory 2003 filing and, at the present time, have not made a decision relative to the 2004 voluntary filing. These reductions are to be matched by revenue neutral increases in rates charged to CT’s telephone customers for basic and enhanced services. Although the intent of the State Access Reform is for there to be no direct impact on CT’s revenues because of the revenue neutral mechanism, the increases in monthly per-line rates may reduce demand among CT’s customers for additional lines and other services.

Revenues for our RLEC’s interstate services, which currently account for approximately 32.3% of its telephone service revenues, are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) based on the “average schedule” formulas proposed by the National Exchange Carrier Association (“NECA”). Removal of CT from the NECA average schedules could result in a significant revenue loss for CT. However, such a development is specifically listed as an exogenous event under CT’s alternative regulation plan. CT’s interstate revenues come from pools that are funded by all NECA companies via subscriber line charges to customers, access charges to interexchange carriers (“IXCs”), and the federal Universal Service Fund. During the Fund’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2004, CT was entitled to receive approximately $14 million in federal universal service (Interstate Common Line Support (ICLS) and Long-Term Support (LTS)) via NECA, which is equivalent to approximately $3.46 per line per month. Changes in the Universal Service Fund formulas could have a material effect on CT’s revenues. On February 12, 2004, the FCC announced that it will merge Long-Term Support, which is one category of Universal Service funding that CT currently receives, into the ICLS category; however, the FCC stated that these changes will not affect current funding levels. CT therefore anticipates that its universal service funding for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005, will not be materially different from its funding for the previous year.

In April 2003, NPCR, Inc. d/b/a Nextel Partners (“Nextel”), a wireless telecommunications provider, petitioned the FCC to designate Nextel as an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (“ETC”) in many areas of Pennsylvania, including all of CT’s service territory. Under the FCC’s rules implementing the Telecommunications Act of 1996, a competitive telecommunications provider that is designated as an ETC may receive the same per-line federal Universal Service Fund disbursements as an incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) receives, for services the competitor provides within that ILEC’s service territory. The Act specifies that in order to receive ETC authority in a territory served by a rural telephone company such as CT, the petitioner must demonstrate that it can provide service throughout the rural company’s territory within a state and that its petition is in the public interest. Under current FCC rules, certification of Nextel would not affect the USF disbursements received by CT. However, in February 2004, a federal-state joint board recommended that the FCC adopt changes to its rules that could result in some reduction of USF disbursements to CT when customers choose to obtain their “primary” telecommunications service from a competing ETC. Under these recommendations, funding would be based upon the number of “primary” connections provided to end users by each company, rather than the total number of lines served. The recommendations also would affect the funding provided to competing companies, such as Nextel, if they are designated as “eligible telecommunications carriers.” The FCC has until February 2005 to act upon this recommendation. CT and other rural companies in Pennsylvania have opposed Nextel’s petition on the grounds that Nextel has not satisfied the statutory standard for ETC certification. Wireless carriers have previously been designated as ETCs in other states, but Nextel is the first wireless carrier to seek ETC status in Pennsylvania.

The FCC has not yet ruled on Nextel’s petition. We are unable to predict the outcome of these developments or their potential effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

CT, CTSI and CLD are required to make contributions to the federal Universal Service Fund, based on their end-user revenues for interstate and international telecommunications services. Each of these companies currently passes through the cost of these contributions to its end-user customers, either as a surcharge or as part of the price of its services. The FCC made relatively modest changes to the contribution formulas in 2002. The FCC is currently considering further changes to its Universal Service Fund regulations that, if adopted, would alter the basis upon which Universal Service Fund contributions are determined and the means by which such contributions may be recovered from customers. The FCC has not yet acted on these proposals and it is not clear whether the FCC will adopt any of these proposals. Based on the foregoing, the application and effect of the Universal Service Fund requirements (and comparable state contribution requirements) on the telecommunications industry cannot be definitively ascertained at this time.

Since 2001, the FCC has been considering proposed changes to its rules to unify several existing systems of inter-carrier compensation (intrastate access, interstate access, reciprocal compensation, EAS settlements, etc.) into a single coherent structure. The FCC has taken no action on these proposals to date, but may reactivate this proceeding in the near future. Various industry groups are currently developing proposals in anticipation of FCC action, and CTE has been active in efforts underway through its industry association, the United States Telecom Association (USTA). The FCC has expressed a tentative preference for moving to a “bill and keep” regime, whereby carriers would exchange traffic with one another without payment of compensation, but may also consider alternative approaches. Since CT currently derives a significant portion of its revenues from inter-carrier compensation, changes in these rules may have material effects on our revenues and earnings. However, any FCC ruling is likely to address the concerns of rural carriers like CT such as the ability to raise other rates to offset reductions in inter-carrier compensation, a transition period, and/or increased Universal Service Funding. Until the FCC adopts a specific proposal, it is impossible to predict how changes in this area may effect CT.

Pursuant to the “rural exemption” provision of Section 251(f)(1) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CT is currently exempted from offering collocation, unbundled network elements (“UNEs”), wholesale discounts and other requirements of the Act that pertain to Regional Bell Operating Companies (“RBOCs”) and non-rural incumbent LECs. The rural exemption does not preclude competitors from providing telephone services within CT’s service area entirely over their own facilities. However, it requires prospective competitors who seek to interconnect with our network in order to resell services or lease unbundled network elements to go through a formal review by the Pennsylvania PUC before receiving approval. The Pennsylvania PUC may grant such approval only if it finds that the competitor’s proposal is not unduly economically burdensome, is technically feasible and is consistent with the Universal Service provisions of the Telecommunications Act. To date, no carrier has sought such a review by the Pennsylvania PUC. However, the Act’s general requirement that telecommunications carriers interconnect networks for the exchange of traffic does apply to CT. CT has received several requests for network interconnection for the exchange of traffic between its network and the networks of other facilities-based telecommunications providers, and has entered into interconnection and reciprocal compensation agreements with several national wireless carriers and several wireline carriers providing for exchange of traffic between its network and theirs.

During 2003, CT received requests from wireless carriers seeking local number portability across much of its territory effective November 24, 2003, and complied with these requests in accordance with FCC requirements. The implementation of wireless number portability could negatively impact our operations, as customers become able to transfer their residential or business telephone number to a wireless telephone.

During 1998, the FCC adopted an order that allows telecommunications carriers to recover over five years their carrier-specific costs of implementing local number portability, which allows customers to retain their local telephone

numbers in the event they change local carriers. The order allows for such cost recovery in the form of a surcharge from customers to whom number portability is available. Tariffs have been filed on CT’s behalf to use this cost recovery mechanism to offset its costs of implementing number portability.

CTSI, LLC

CTSI’s prices are subject to regulation and review by the FCC and the PUC although, as a competitive provider, its rates are typically subject to much less scrutiny than those of CT, or those of Verizon which is the dominant local telephone service provider. CTSI’s costs are also affected by regulatory decisions, because CTSI relies in part on facilities and services purchased from incumbent telephone companies (primarily Verizon), including interconnection for the exchange of local traffic with other companies, in providing its services. CTSI has separate month-to-month interconnection agreements with Verizon covering its former Bell Atlantic and former GTE operating areas in Pennsylvania.

Effective October 2, 2003, the FCC adopted significant changes to its rules requiring incumbent carriers like Verizon to offer unbundled access to network elements to competing carriers like CTSI. Under the new rules, Verizon will continue to be required to offer access to unbundled voice-grade loops, which is the network element that CTSI uses most frequently. On March 2, 2004, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals vacated and remanded substantial parts of these rules to the FCC for further consideration, which could result in additional changes to the rules. At this time, it appears that these rulings will not likely have a material effect on CTSI’s costs and profitability, but we cannot predict the outcomes of future court and FCC rulings. Also, during 2003, the FCC gave notice of a proposed rulemaking in which it is considering changing the formula used by state commissions, including the Pennsylvania PUC, to determine rates for access to Verizon network elements and for interconnection to Verizon’s network. It is unknown at this time when the FCC will act on this proposal or what effects any changes in the rate formula will have on CTSI’s costs.

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Pennsylvania PUC has authority to arbitrate any disputes over the terms and conditions of interconnection between CTSI and Verizon, and the prices of various unbundled network elements CTSI purchases from Verizon. The PUC has taken a number of actions over the past several years affecting the prices for network elements, as well as the terms and conditions under which these elements are provided. The PUC operates within a framework of national rules adopted by the FCC governing network element unbundling. In 2003 and 2004, the PUC approved changes in Verizon’s rates for unbundled local loops (that is, circuits connecting business and residential users’ premises to the Verizon central office). These rates, which will become effective in September 2004, include a decrease in CTSI’s cost to obtain local loops in Verizon’s density cell 3 exchanges (where most CTSI customers are located), but an increase in the cost to serve customers in density cell 4. Overall, the impact of these rate changes for CTSI is positive. The PUC is continuing to consider proposals by Verizon and other interested parties to combine and/or realign the rates for density cells 3 and 4, but has not yet taken any action on this proposal. Further decisions by the PUC and the FCC regarding these interconnection and unbundling obligations may have a material effect on CTSI’s costs and profitability.

On October 8, 2002, the Pennsylvania PUC entered an order initiating a generic investigation concerning the use of virtual NXX codes in Pennsylvania. Virtual NXX is the industry practice of assigning and populating NXX codes in exchanges where no physical LEC presence exists for the carrier responsible for the NXX code. The concern raised with virtual NXX involves carrier compensation and expense for calling activity terminated to these exchange codes. At this time we are unable to predict the outcome of this proceeding, or its possible effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

The FCC has adopted rules limiting the amounts that CTSI can charge other carriers for access to its network for originating and terminating interstate calls (access charges). Under these rules, carriers such as CTSI are currently permitted to charge interstate access rates no higher than those charged by the incumbent carrier in their operating territories, which in our case is Verizon (whose access rates currently average approximately $0.0042 per minute).

The FCC also has limited the right of competitive local carriers, such as CTSI, to collect reciprocal compensation on local telephone calls that terminate to ISPs. Under these rules, which took effect in June 2001, the amount of compensation payable to CTSI on calls to ISPs above a 3 to 1 ratio generally is limited to $0.0007 per minute. In addition, the total number of minutes for which CTSI can collect compensation at this rate is capped based on the number of minutes CTSI terminated in the first quarter 2001. On May 3, 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit remanded the order in which the FCC adopted these rules, on the grounds that the FCC did not provide proper statutory authority for its order. The Court did not vacate the rules, however, and so the current compensation scheme will remain in effect pending the remand. To date, the FCC has taken no action in response to the Court’s remand.

CTSI derives a substantial portion of its revenues both directly and indirectly from ISPs. We expect that this reliance will continue in the foreseeable future. ISPs represented approximately 17.2% and 25.3% of CTSI’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. This percentage has decreased as a result of the revised percent of local usage (PLU) factor with Verizon discussed in the following paragraph. These high-margin revenues include services provided directly to the ISP including local and cap-type services and indirect services including reciprocal compensation, and trunking from Verizon as a result of Verizon’s customers calling these ISPs. Industry-wide trends towards declining usage of dial-up Internet access may threaten the profitability or viability of our ISP customers. If we lose a significant number of these customers that are providing dial-up Internet services, or if a significant portion of these customers are unable to pay amounts owed to us, our financial results could be negatively impacted.

The FCC rate ceilings will result in reductions in the revenues CTSI receives from interstate access charges and reciprocal compensation. In addition, continued industry-wide trends towards declining usage of dial-up Internet access and of long-distance services generally, will have a negative impact on these revenues. CTSI’s revenues from access charges and reciprocal compensation are also affected by the mix of traffic delivered to it by other carriers for termination to CTSI customers. During 2003, Verizon notified CTSI of a reduction in the proportion of its delivered traffic that will be subject to intrastate access charges, and a corresponding increase in the proportion that will be subject to reciprocal compensation rates, due to a revised PLU factor. Because the reciprocal compensation rates are much lower than access charges, this change in traffic mix reduced CTSI’s revenues by approximately $700 per month beginning November 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, CTSI recorded approximately $3,277 or 7.9% of its revenues from compensation revenue from ISP traffic. This compares to $7,179 or 16.7% for the same period in the previous year. Of these amounts, local reciprocal compensation associated with ISP traffic was $1,468 or 0.9% and $1,855 or 1.1% of our total consolidated revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Revenues from interstate access charges represented approximately 0.7% and 0.9% of our consolidated revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

CTSI may also be affected by any changes in FCC rules governing inter-carrier compensation, as discussed above with respect to CT.

The PUC recently rejected a request made by Verizon to declare all services provided to business customers as qualifying for special individual case basis pricing arrangements. After Verizon asked the PUC to reconsider its decision, the PUC agreed to consider a more narrowly tailored proposal that would permit Verizon to offer the requested pricing arrangements only to small business customers in urban and suburban areas of Pennsylvania. It is unknown at this time whether the PUC will grant Verizon’s request.

CTSI has received several requests for network interconnection for the exchange of traffic between its network and the networks of other facilities-based telecommunications providers, and has entered into interconnection and reciprocal compensation agreements with several national wireless carriers providing for exchange of traffic between its network and theirs.

CTSI may also be affected by the introduction of wireless number portability in November 2003, for the same reasons discussed above with respect to CT. CTSI is permitted by applicable rules to recover the cost of implementing number portability from its end users, and recently filed tariff revisions to collect a surcharge from end users to recover this cost.

In February 2004, Verizon Pennsylvania filed a complaint against CTSI with the Pennsylvania PUC, seeking a refund and/or credits for approximately $7.9 million in facilities charges that CTSI billed to Verizon over a two-year period. In addition, CTSI has filed a civil action against Verizon Pennsylvania in the Court of Common Pleas for Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, seeking damages in the amount of approximately $7.9 million relating to the same dispute. Various pleadings have been filed by both parties at the PUC as well as the court of Common Pleas with regard to which venue has proper jurisdiction over this matter. At this time, we cannot predict the timing or outcome of these proceedings. The dispute does not affect our projections of future revenues, because it is limited to charges billed before November 2002.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk - We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our borrowing activities. There is inherent rollover risk for borrowings as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and our future financing requirements.

We measure the fair value of the convertible debt based upon current market prices or by obtaining quotes from dealers. The fair value of bank debt is estimated using discounted cash flow calculations. The table that follows summarizes the fair values of our fixed and variable rate debt. The table also provides a sensitivity analysis of the estimated fair values of these financial instruments assuming 100-basis-point upward and downward shifts in the weighted average interest rate.

(thousands of dollars)


As of June 30, 2004	Carrying amount		Fair value		Fair value assuming +100 basis point shift		Fair value assuming -100 basis point shift
Long-term debt and notes payable:
Fixed	$	300,000	$	305,250	$	294,321	$	316,713
Variable	$	50,000	$	50,000	$	49,307	$	50,709

We manage our interest rate risk through a combination of variable and fixed rate debt instruments at varying maturities and by using interest rate swaps.

The table below provides information about our interest rate swaps. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. The estimated fair value amounts have been provided to us by the financial institutions with which we have swap contracts using appropriate and consistent valuation methodologies.

(thousands of dollars)


	Maturity date	Fixed rate		Notional amount	Approximate fair value as of June 30, 2004
Variable to fixed:
Hedge 4	2004	6.13	%	15,000	(184	)
Hedge 6	2006	5.40	%	35,000	(1,880	)

Hedges 1 and 2 matured in the second quarter 2002, and were not renewed. Additionally, Hedge 5 matured in the third quarter 2002, and was not renewed. Hedge 7 matured in May 2003 and was not renewed. Hedge 3 matured in the second quarter of 2004 and was not renewed.

As of August 9, 2004, we had no other material exposure to market risk.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

The management of Commonwealth Telephone Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”), under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, conducted an evaluation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

In February 2004, Verizon Pennsylvania filed a Petition for Resolution of a Dispute with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”), seeking a refund and/or credits for approximately $7.9 million in facilities charges that CTSI billed to Verizon over a two-year period. In addition, CTSI has filed a civil action against Verizon Pennsylvania in the Court of Common Pleas for Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, seeking damages in the amount of approximately $7.9 million relating to the same dispute. Various pleadings have been filed by both parties at the PUC as well as at the Court of Common Pleas with regard to which venue has proper jurisdiction over this matter, but we cannot predict the timing or outcome of these proceedings at this time. We believe, based on our estimate of the probable outcome, that we are adequately reserved for the resolution of this dispute.

Item 2.

Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Effective November 13, 2003, our Board of Directors authorized a Stock Repurchase Program of up to $100 million of our Common Stock. On February 9, 2004, our Board of Directors increased the size of the total stock repurchase program to up to $150 million of CTE Common Stock. No time limit has been set for the completion of the Stock Repurchase Program. We had no other stock repurchase plan or program expire during the period covered by the table. Also, no plans or programs were terminated prior to expiration. All purchases were made in accordance with the safe harbor in Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The purchases have and will be made in open market, negotiated or block transactions. The transactions will be executed at our discretion, based on ongoing assessments of our capital needs, and the market value of our Common Stock. Repurchased shares have and will be placed in Treasury and may be used for the Company’s employee benefit plans. The table below provides information regarding settled purchases of CTE Common Stock made by us during the second quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report:


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program (dollars in thousands)
April 1, 2004-April 30, 2004	71,300	40.573	71,300	50,924
May 1, 2004-May 31, 2004	184,100	41.947	184,100	43,202
June 1, 2004-June 30, 2004	257,300	42.480	257,300	32,272

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 19, 2004. Matters submitted to our shareholders included:

1)	The election of the following Class I Directors to serve for a term of three (3) years:


Nominee	For	Withheld
Frank M. Henry	17,393,120	576,050
Michael J. Mahoney	17,545,807	423,363
John J. Whyte	17,637,548	331,622

Additional Directors whose term of office as a Director continued after the meeting included:

James Q. Crowe

Richard R. Jaros

Eugene Roth

Daniel E. Knowles

David C. McCourt

David C. Mitchell

Walter Scott, Jr.

2)	The ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for the year ending December 31, 2004.


For	Against	Abstain
17,691,608	272,051	5,511

3)	The approval of the Non-Management Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan.


For	Against	Abstain
13,996,748	2,381,115	19,133

Item 5.

Other Information

None

Item 6.

Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)

Exhibits



4.1		Amendment to Line of Credit Agreement by and between Commonwealth Telephone Company and CoBank, ACB dated as of May 20, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1 on Form S-3 as filed with the Commission on July 26, 2004, Registration No. 333-110325.

10.1		Agreement and Release dated as of July 20, 2004, by and between Commonwealth Telephone Enterprises, Inc. and James DePolo is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to our Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1 on Form S-3 as filed with the Commission on July 26, 2004, Registration No. 333-110325.

10.2		Commonwealth Telephone Enterprises, Inc. Non-Management Directors’ Stock Compensation Plan effective February 25, 2004.

10.3		Amended Common-Wealth Builder 401(k) Plan dated as of July 16, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference to Form S-8 Registration Statement of Registrant as filed with the Commission on July 16, 2004, Registration No. 333-117450.

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification

32		Section 1350 Certifications

(b)

Reports on Form 8-K

On June 24, 2004, the Company filed a report on Item 5 of Form 8-K to announce the appointment of Eileen O’Neill Odum as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Date: August 9, 2004				COMMONWEALTH TELEPHONE ENTERPRISES, INC.

				/s/ DONALD P. CAWLEY
				Donald P. Cawley Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents