NOVASTAR FINANCIAL INC - 10-Q Quarterly Report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004.

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From to

Commission File Number 001-13533

NOVASTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Maryland		74-2830661
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)


8140 Ward Parkway, Suite 300, Kansas City, MO		64114
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (816) 237-7000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes x No ¨

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding on August 3, 2004 was 24,993,465.

NOVASTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

FORM 10-Q

Quarter Ended June 30, 2004


Part I	Financial Information

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited):
	Balance Sheets	1
	Statements of Income	2
	Statements of Cash Flows	3
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
	Table 1, Nonconforming Loan Originations	22
	Table 2, Carrying Value of Mortgage Loans	23
	Table 3, Valuation of Individual Mortgage Securities and Assumptions	24
	Table 4, Summary of Mortgage Securities Retained by Year of Issue	28
	Table 5, Short-term Financing Resources	28
	Table 6, Mortgage Securities Interest Analysis	30
	Table 7, Mortgage Portfolio Management Net Interest Income Analysis	31
	Table 8, Quarterly Activity – Allowance for Credit Losses	33
	Table 9, Gains on Sales of Mortgage Assets and Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments	34
	Table 10, Mortgage Loan Sales and Securitizations	35
	Table 11, General and Administrative Expenses	36
	Table 12, Wholesale Loan Costs of Production, as a Percent of Principal	37
	Table 13, Summary of Servicing Operations	37
	Table 14, Taxable Net Income	38
	Table 15, Contractual Obligations	40

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	41
	Table 16, Interest Rate Sensitivity – Income	41
	Table 17, Interest Rate Sensitivity – Market Value	42
	Table 18, Interest Rate Risk Management Contracts	43

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	43

Part II	Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	44

Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	44

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	44

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	44

Item 5.	Other Information	45

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	45

	Signatures	46

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

NOVASTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited; dollars in thousands, except share amounts)


	June 30, 2004			December 31, 2003
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	191,291		$	118,180
Mortgage loans – held-for-sale		1,370,034			697,992
Mortgage loans – held-in-portfolio		74,665			94,717
Mortgage securities – available-for-sale		389,050			382,287
Mortgage servicing rights		26,442			19,685
Servicing related advances		20,794			19,281
Deposits with derivative instrument counterparties, net		19,378			19,492
Property and equipment, net		13,741			14,537
Other assets		64,073			33,786

Total assets	$	2,169,468		$	1,399,957

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities:
Short-term borrowings secured by mortgage loans	$	1,311,810		$	639,852
Short-term borrowings secured by mortgage securities		200,728			232,684
Asset-backed bonds secured by mortgage loans		69,778			89,384
Asset-backed bonds secured by mortgage securities		121,749			43,596
Accounts payable and other liabilities		82,676			63,658
Dividends payable		33,741			30,559

Total liabilities		1,820,482			1,099,733

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:
Capital stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized:
Common stock, 24,993,465 and 24,447,315 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		250			245
Preferred stock, 2,990,000 issued and outstanding		30			—
Additional paid-in capital		320,428			231,294
Accumulated deficit		(20,180	)		(15,522	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		49,364			85,183
Other		(906	)		(976	)

Total stockholders’ equity		348,986			300,224

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,169,468		$	1,399,957

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NOVASTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited; dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Interest income:
Mortgage securities	$	65,333		$	41,675		$	32,137		$	23,357
Mortgage loans held-for-sale		34,910			32,621			19,794			14,790
Mortgage loans held-in-portfolio		3,792			6,016			1,745			2,849

Total interest income		104,035			80,312			53,676			40,996
Interest expense:
Short-term borrowings secured by mortgage loans		10,992			10,522			6,237			5,056
Short-term borrowings secured by mortgage securities		2,343			1,370			1,151			810
Asset-backed bonds secured by mortgage loans		691			1,371			327			604
Asset-backed bonds secured by mortgage securities		4,843			1,997			2,495			814
Net settlements of derivative instruments used in cash flow hedges		2,581			4,818			519			2,165

Total interest expense		21,450			20,078			10,729			9,449

Net interest income before credit (losses) recoveries		82,585			60,234			42,947			31,547
Credit (losses) recoveries		(661	)		263			(515	)		171

Net interest income		81,924			60,497			42,432			31,718
Fee income		88,750			34,195			43,231			19,678
Gains on sales of mortgage assets		76,954			73,474			25,174			44,031
Gains (losses) on derivative instruments		1,717			(24,186	)		27,115			(15,037	)
Premiums for mortgage loan insurance		(1,581	)		(2,003	)		(955	)		(1,224	)
Impairment on mortgage securities – available-for-sale		(6,117	)		—			(6,117	)		—
Other income, net		2,233			943			1,246			760
General and administrative expenses:
Compensation and benefits		87,609			43,622			43,783			24,817
Marketing		33,019			11,659			17,313			6,692
Office administration		22,906			10,125			12,646			5,182
Loan expense		11,375			9,562			7,549			6,544
Professional and outside services		6,106			2,978			3,724			1,464
Other		8,874			4,970			4,491			2,323

Total general and administrative expenses		169,889			82,916			89,506			47,022

Income before income tax expense		73,991			60,004			42,620			32,904
Income tax expense		7,440			8,324			6,994			4,183

Net income		66,551			51,680			35,626			28,721
Dividends on preferred shares		(2,938	)		—			(1,663	)		—

Net income available to common shareholders	$	63,613		$	51,680		$	33,963		$	28,721

Basic earnings per share	$	2.56		$	2.41		$	1.36		$	1.32

Diluted earnings per share	$	2.51		$	2.35		$	1.34		$	1.28

Weighted average basic shares outstanding		24,817			21,402			24,978			21,800

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		25,338			21,996			25,377			22,430

Dividends declared per common share	$	2.70		$	2.54		$	1.35		$	1.25

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NOVASTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited; in thousands)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2004			2003
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	66,551		$	51,680
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Amortization of premiums on mortgage assets		417			547
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights		7,137			3,652
Accretion of available-for-sale securities		(46,051	)		(38,298	)
Impairment on mortgage securities – available-for-sale		6,117			—
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs		1,517			273
Forgiveness of founders’ promissory notes		70			70
Credit losses (recoveries)		661			(263	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held-for-sale in securitizations		3,023,630			2,336,432
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held-for-sale to third parties		39,008			508,028
Originations and purchases of mortgage loans held-for-sale		(3,819,693	)		(2,642,668	)
Repayments of mortgage loans held-for-sale		6,536			17,089
Gains on sales of mortgage assets		(76,954	)		(73,474	)
Losses (gains) on derivative instruments		(1,717	)		24,186
Compensation recognized under stock option plan		875			660
Depreciation expense		2,749			1,406
Changes in:
Servicing related advances		(1,435	)		(843	)
Other assets		(28,874	)		(23,584	)
Other liabilities		15,316			19,491

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(804,140	)		184,384
Cash flows from investing activities:
Mortgage loan repayments—held-in-portfolio		17,746			22,695
Proceeds from paydowns on available-for-sale securities		140,743			70,255
Proceeds from sales of assets acquired through foreclosure		3,277			3,026

Net cash provided by investing activities		161,766			95,976
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on asset-backed bonds		(96,995	)		(56,416	)
Proceeds from issuance of asset-backed bonds		154,025			—
Change in short-term borrowings		640,002			(181,463	)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock and exercise of equity instruments, net of offering costs		84,731			26,373
Dividends paid on preferred stock		(2,938	)		—
Dividends paid on common stock		(63,340	)		(43,994	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		715,485			(255,500	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		73,111			24,860
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		118,180			79,742

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	191,291		$	104,602

Continued


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	20,422	$	23,568

Cash paid for income taxes	$	14,665	$	3,237

Cash received on mortgage securities with no cost basis	$	19,282	$	3,377

Non-cash operating and investing activities:
Retention of mortgage servicing rights	$	13,894	$	9,401

Assets acquired through foreclosure	$	2,345	$	4,098

Securities retained in securitizations	$	159,350	$	143,013

Dividend reinvestment plan program	$	1,016	$	—

Restricted stock issued in satisfaction of prior year accrued bonus	$	1,816	$	—

Concluded

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NOVASTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2004 (Unaudited)

Note 1. Financial Statement Presentation

The consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2004 and for the periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all necessary adjustments have been made, which were of a normal and recurring nature, for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Certain reclassifications to prior year amounts have been made to conform to current year presentation.

The consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements of NovaStar Financial and the notes thereto, included in NovaStar Financial’s annual report to shareholders and annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

The consolidated financial statements of NovaStar Financial include the accounts of all wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

The Company was party to limited liability company agreements (“LLCs”), formed to facilitate the operation of retail mortgage broker businesses as branch affiliates. The LLC agreements provided for initial capitalization and membership interests of 99.9% to each branch manager and 0.1% to the Company. Prior to 2004, the Company accounted for its interest in the LLC agreements using the equity method of accounting. In December 2003, the Company determined it would terminate the LLC’s effective January 1, 2004. During February 2004, the Company notified the branch managers of the limited liability companies that the Company was terminating these agreements effective January 1, 2004. Continuing branches that formerly operated under these agreements became operating units of the Company and their financial results are included in the consolidated financial statements. The inclusion resulted in expected increases in general and administrative expenses, which were substantially offset by increases in related fee income. See Note 10 for Consolidated Pro Forma Statements of Income.

Additionally, 2003 results were restated related to the Company’s adoption of the preferable fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” under the modified prospective transition method selected by the Company as described in SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” Refer to Note 3.

Note 2. New Accounting Pronouncement

In March 2004, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments” was released. This release summarizes the SEC staff position regarding the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to loan commitments accounted for as derivative instruments. The Company accounts for interest rate lock commitments issued on mortgage loans that will be held for sale as derivative instruments. Consistent with SAB No. 105, the Company considers the fair value of these commitments to be zero at the commitment date, with subsequent changes in fair value determined solely on changes in market interest rates. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had interest rate lock commitments on mortgage loans with principal balances of $306 million, the fair value of which was $(83,000).

At the March 17-18, 2004 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting, the Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments”. Issue 03-1 provides guidance for determining when an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired and disclosure requirements regarding impairments that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary. Other-than-temporarily impairment evaluations are effective for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 consolidated financial statements. Issue 03-1 is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Note 3. Stock Based Compensation

The Company’s 1996 Stock Option Plan provides for the grant of qualified incentive stock options (ISOs), non-qualified stock options (NQSOs), deferred stock, restricted stock, performance shares, stock appreciation rights, limited stock awards and dividend equivalent rights (DERs). Prior to 2003, the Company accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB No. 25) and related interpretations. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted the preferable fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123. Under the modified prospective transition method selected by the Company as described in SFAS No. 148, compensation cost recognized for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 is the same as that which would have been recognized had the fair value method of SFAS No. 123 been applied from its original effective date.

As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148, 2003 results were restated to reflect the impact of the adoption of the fair value method under SFAS 123. For the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, the impact of this restatement on compensation and benefits, within general and administrative expenses, was a decrease of approximately $6.2 million and $5.6 million, respectively, resulting in a positive impact to net income in the same amount. The net income per diluted share impact of this restatement was an increase of $0.28 and $0.25 per share for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003.

Note 4. Loan Securitizations

On January 14, 2004, NovaStar Mortgage delivered the remaining $479.8 million in loans collateralizing NMFT Series 2003-4. On March 11, 2004 and June 16, 2004, NovaStar Mortgage executed securitization transactions accounted for as sales of loans. In addition, derivative instruments with a fair value of $(13.8) million and $15.7 million were transferred into the 2004-1 and 2004-2 trusts, respectively. These instruments serve to reduce interest rate risk to the bondholders. Details of these transactions are as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Value of Asset- Backed Bonds Issued		Economic Residual Value as of June 30, 2004		Principal Balance of Collateral Sold		Net Gain Recognized
NMFT Series 2003-4 (A)	$	1,482,000	$	51,294	$	479,810	$	9,015
NMFT Series 2004-1	$	1,727,250	$	74,188	$	1,750,000	$	64,112
NMFT Series 2004-2 (B)	$	1,374,800	$	45,254	$	840,278	$	2,853

(A)	On November 20, 2003, $1.0 billion in loans collateralizing NMFT Series 2003-4 were delivered with a gain of $22.0 million recognized.

(B)	On July 1, 2004, the remaining $559.7 million in loans collateralizing NMFT Series 2004-2 were delivered into the trust. We received $559.7 million in proceeds on July 1, 2004, which had been held in escrow by the trustee.

Note 5. Mortgage Securities – Available-for-Sale

Available-for-sale mortgage securities consisted of the Company’s investment in the interest-only, prepayment penalty and other subordinated securities that the trust issued. The primary bonds were sold to parties independent of the Company. Management estimates their fair value by discounting the expected future cash flow of the collateral and bonds. The average yield on mortgage securities is the interest income for the year as a percentage of the average fair market value on mortgage securities. The cost basis, unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value and average yield of mortgage securities as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were as follows (dollars in thousands):


	Cost Basis		Gross Unrealized				Estimated Fair Value		Average Yield
	Cost Basis		Gains		Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Average Yield
As of June 30, 2004	$	339,313	$	49,737	$	—	$	389,050	33.4	%
As of December 31, 2003		294,562		87,826		101		382,287	34.3

The Company recorded an impairment loss of $6.1 million on its mortgage securities – available-for-sale for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004. The following table is a rollforward of mortgage securities from January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004 (in thousands).


	Cost			Net Unrealized Gain			Estimated Fair Value of Mortgage Securities
As of January 1, 2003	$	102,665		$	76,214		$	178,879

Increases (decreases) to mortgage securities:
New securities retained in securitizations		292,675			7,077			299,752
Accretion of income		98,804			—			98,804
Proceeds from paydowns of securities		(199,582	)		—			(199,582	)
Mark-to-market value adjustment		—			4,434			4,434

Net increase to mortgage securities		191,897			11,511			203,408

As of December 31, 2003		294,562			87,725			382,287

Increases (decreases) to mortgage securities:
New securities retained in securitizations (A)		159,350			3,615			162,965
Accretion of income		65,333			—			65,333
Proceeds from paydowns of securities		(173,815	)		—			(173,815	)
Impairment on mortgage securities - available-for-sale		(6,117	)		—			(6,117	)
Mark-to-market value adjustment		—			(41,603	)		(41,603	)

Net increase (decrease) to mortgage securities		44,751			(37,988	)		6,763

As of June 30, 2004	$	339,313		$	49,737		$	389,050

(A)	See Note 4 for further discussion.

Note 6. NovaStar NIMS 2004-N1

On February 19, 2004, the Company issued asset-backed bonds in the amount of $156.6 million secured by the interest only, prepayment penalty and subordinated mortgage securities of NMFT 2003-3 and NMFT 2003-4 as a means for long-term financing. The mortgage securities are recorded as assets of the Company and the asset-backed bonds are recorded as debt. The performance of the mortgage loan collateral underlying these securities is the sole source of repayment of these asset-backed bonds. The interest rate on the asset-backed bonds is fixed at 4.458% and the estimated weighted average months to maturity is based on estimates and assumptions made by management. The actual maturity may differ from expectations.

Note 7. UBS Borrowings

In connection with the lending agreement with UBS Warburg Real Estate Securities Inc. (UBS), NovaStar Mortgage SPV I (NovaStar Trust), a Delaware statutory trust, has been established by NovaStar Mortgage, Inc. (NovaStar) as a wholly owned special-purpose warehouse finance subsidiary whose assets and liabilities are included in the consolidated financial statements.

NovaStar Trust has agreed to issue and sell to UBS notes (the “Notes”). Under the legal agreements which document the issuance and sale of the Notes:

•

all assets which are from time to time owned by NovaStar Trust are legally owned by NovaStar Trust and not by NovaStar.

•

NovaStar Trust is a legal entity separate and distinct from NovaStar and all other affiliates of NovaStar.

•

the assets of NovaStar Trust are legally assets only of NovaStar Trust, and are not legally available to NovaStar and all other affiliates of NovaStar or their respective creditors, for pledge to other creditors or to satisfy the claims of other creditors.

•

none of NovaStar or any other affiliate of NovaStar is legally liable on the debts of NovaStar Trust, except for an amount limited to 10% of the maximum dollar amount of the Notes permitted to be issued.

•

the only assets of NovaStar which result from the issuance and sale of the Notes are:

any cash portion of the purchase price paid from time to time by NovaStar Trust in consideration of Mortgage Loans sold to NovaStar Trust by NovaStar; and

the value of NovaStar’s net equity investment in NovaStar Trust.

•

As of June 30, 2004, NovaStar Trust had the following assets:

whole loans: $483.6 million

REO Properties: $0

cash and cash equivalents: $6.3 million

•

As of June 30, 2004, NovaStar Trust had the following liabilities and equity:

short-term debt due to UBS: $482.4 million, and

$7.5 million in members’ equity investment.

Note 8. Issuance of Capital Stock

The Company sold 234,020 shares of its common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2004 under the Direct Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Net proceeds of $11.9 million were raised under these sales of common stock.

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, 312,130 shares of common stock were issued under the Company’s stock based compensation plan. Proceeds of $1.7 million were received under these issuances.

On January 16, 2004, the Company sold 2.6 million shares of Series C Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, raising $62.9 million in net proceeds. The shares have a liquidation value of $25.00 per share and will pay an annual coupon of 8.90%. On February 6, 2004, the underwriters exercised their options for 390,000 shares in over-allotments resulting in net proceeds of $9.2 million.

Note 9. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income includes net income and revenues, expenses, gains and losses that are not included in net income. Following is a summary of comprehensive income for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands).


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Net income.	$	66,551		$	51,680		$	35,626		$	28,721
Other comprehensive income
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of income taxes		(37,988	)		20,354			(22,544	)		7,100
Change in unrealized loss on derivative instruments used in cash flow hedges		(412	)		(1,591	)		(19	)		(586	)
Net settlements of derivative instruments used in cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings		2,607			4,869			519			2,190
Other amortization		(26	)		(51	)		—			(25	)

Comprehensive income	$	30,732		$	75,261		$	13,582		$	37,400

Note 10. Pro Forma 2003 Statements of Income

As discussed in Note 1, the LLC agreements were terminated effective January 1, 2004. Continuing branches that formerly operated under these agreements became operating units of the Company and their financial results are included in the consolidated financial statements. The inclusion resulted in expected increases in general and administrative expenses, which were substantially offset by increases in related fee income. The Company did not purchase any assets or liabilities as a result of these branches becoming operating units. The following table compares the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 as reported to Pro Forma as if the LLC’s had been operating units of the Company (in thousands).


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003						For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003
	Actual			Pro Forma			Actual			Pro Forma
Net interest income	$	60,497		$	60,497		$	31,547		$	31,547
Gains on sales of mortgage assets		73,474			80,766			44,031			48,764
Fee income		34,195			77,871			19,678			44,417
Other expense, net		(25,246	)		(25,246	)		(15,330	)		(15,330	)
General and administrative expenses		(82,916	)		(136,096	)		(47,022	)		(77,236	)

Income before income tax expense		60,004			57,792			32,904			32,162
Income tax expense		8,324			7,461			4,183			3,894

Net income	$	51,680		$	50,331		$	28,721		$	28,268

Basic earnings per share	$	2.41		$	2.35		$	1.32		$	1.30

Diluted earnings per share	$	2.35		$	2.29		$	1.28		$	1.26

Note 11. Segment Reporting

The Company reviews, manages and operates its business in three segments. These business segments are: mortgage portfolio management, mortgage lending and loan servicing and branch operations. Mortgage portfolio management operating results are driven from the income generated on the assets we manage less associated management costs. Mortgage lending and loan servicing operations include the marketing, underwriting and funding of loan production. Servicing operations represent the income and costs to service the Company’s on and off -balance sheet loans. Branch operations include the collective income generated by NovaStar Home Mortgage brokers and the associated operating costs. Also, the corporate-level income and costs to support the NHMI branches are represented in the branch operations segment. As discussed in Note 1 and Note 10, the LLC agreements were terminated effective January 1, 2004. Continuing branch operations that formerly operated under these agreements became operating units of the Company and their financial results are included in the consolidated financial statements. Following is a summary of the operating results of the Company’s primary operating units for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands).

Six Months Ended June 30, 2004


	Mortgage Portfolio Management			Mortgage Lending and Loan Servicing			Branch Operations			Eliminations			Total
Interest income	$	69,123		$	34,930		$	—		$	(18	)	$	104,035
Interest expense		9,434			16,358			36			(4,378	)		21,450

Net interest income (expense) before credit losses		59,689			18,572			(36	)		4,360			82,585
Credit losses		(661	)		—			—			—			(661	)
Fee income		—			15,084			106,565			(32,899	)		88,750
Gains on sales of mortgage assets		409			59,891			—			16,654			76,954
Gains on derivative instruments		582			1,135			—			—			1,717
Impairment on mortgage securities –available for sale		(6,117	)		—			—			—			(6,117	)
Other income (expense)		8,919			(4,212	)		20			(4,075	)		652
General and administrative expenses		(3,604	)		(69,706	)		(109,687	)		13,108			(169,889	)

Income (loss) before income tax		59,217			20,764			(3,138	)		(2,852	)		73,991
Income tax expense (benefit)		—			9,776			(1,224	)		(1,112	)		7,440

Net income (loss)	$	59,217		$	10,988		$	(1,914	)	$	(1,740	)	$	66,551

Six Months Ended June 30, 2003


	Mortgage Portfolio Management			Mortgage Lending and Loan Servicing			Branch Operations			Eliminations			Total
Interest income	$	47,691		$	32,621		$	—		$	—		$	80,312
Interest expense		8,178			19,727			—			(7,827	)		20,078

Net interest income before credit recoveries		39,513			12,894			—			7,827			60,234
Credit recoveries		263			—			—			—			263
Fee income		255			19,298			19,200			(4,558	)		34,195
Gains (losses) on sales of mortgage assets		(993	)		71,493			—			2,974			73,474
Losses on derivative instruments		(1,118	)		(23,068	)		—			—			(24,186	)
Other income (expense)		12,376			(7,225	)		32			(6,243	)		(1,060	)
General and administrative expenses		(3,609	)		(62,663	)		(16,644	)		—			(82,916	)

Income before income tax		46,687			10,729			2,588			—			60,004
Income tax expense		—			7,329			995			—			8,324

Net income	$	46,687		$	3,400		$	1,593		$	—		$	51,680

Three Months Ended June 30, 2004


	Mortgage Portfolio Management			Mortgage Lending and Loan Servicing			Branch Operations			Eliminations			Total
Interest income	$	33,880		$	19,804		$	—		$	(8	)	$	53,676
Interest expense		4,188			8,647			17			(2,123	)		10,729

Net interest income (expense) before credit losses		29,692			11,157			(17	)		2,115			42,947
Credit losses		(515	)		—			—			—			(515	)
Fee income		—			7,192			54,941			(18,902	)		43,231
Gains on sales of mortgage assets		24			12,959			—			12,191			25,174
Gains on derivative instruments		1,772			25,343			—			—			27,115
Impairment on mortgage securities - available for sale		(6,117	)		—			—			—			(6,117	)
Other income (expense)		4,738			(2,467	)		10			(1,990	)		291
General and administrative expenses		(1,655	)		(37,056	)		(56,643	)		5,848			(89,506	)

Income (loss) before income tax		27,939			17,128			(1,709	)		(738	)		42,620
Income tax expense (benefit)		—			7,948			(666	)		(288	)		6,994

Net income (loss)	$	27,939		$	9,180		$	(1,043	)	$	(450	)	$	35,626

Three Months Ended June 30, 2003


	Mortgage Portfolio Management			Mortgage Lending and Loan Servicing			Branch Operations			Eliminations			Total
Interest income	$	26,207		$	14,789		$	—		$	—		$	40,996
Interest expense		3,697			10,151			—			(4,399	)		9,449

Net interest income before credit recoveries		22,510			4,638			—			4,399			31,547
Credit recoveries		171			—			—			—			171
Fee income		41			11,593			10,382			(2,338	)		19,678
Gains (losses) on sales of mortgage assets		(778	)		43,363			—			1,446			44,031
Losses on derivative instruments		(403	)		(14,634	)		—			—			(15,037	)
Other income (expense)		6,434			(3,406	)		15			(3,507	)		(464	)
General and administrative expenses		(1,755	)		(36,609	)		(8,658	)		—			(47,022	)

Income before income tax		26,220			4,945			1,739			—			32,904
Income tax expense		—			3,518			665			—			4,183

Net income	$	26,220		$	1,427		$	1,074		$	—		$	28,721

Intersegment revenues and expenses that were eliminated in consolidation were as follows for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands):


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Amounts paid to (received from) mortgage portfolio from (to) mortgage lending and loan servicing:
Loan servicing fees	$	(246	)	$	(372	)	$	(116	)	$	(179	)
Intercompany interest income		4,342			7,827			2,106			4,399
Guaranty, commitment, loan sale and securitization fees		4,463			5,353			2,451			2,419
Amounts paid to (received from) branch operations from (to) mortgage lending and loan servicing:
Lender premium		13,625			2,974			7,048			1,446
Subsidized fees		21			1,212			—			713
Interest income and fees on warehouse line		(36	)		—			(17	)		—

Additionally, as previously discussed, the LLC agreements were terminated effective January 1, 2004 and all continuing branches that formerly operated under these agreements became operating units of the Company. As a result, during consolidation, the Company is applying the provisions of SFAS No. 91 “Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases” to its branch operations segment. Based on SFAS No. 91, the Company defers certain nonrefundable fees and direct costs associated with the origination of loans in the branch operations segment which are subsequently brokered to the mortgage lending and servicing segment. The mortgage lending and servicing segment ultimately funds the loans and then sells the loans either through securitizations or outright sales to third parties. The net deferred cost (income) becomes part of the cost basis of the loans and serves to either increase (net deferred income) or decrease (net deferred cost) the gain or loss recognized by the mortgage lending and servicing segment. These transactions are accounted for in the eliminations column of the Company’s segment reporting. The following table summarizes these amounts for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 (in thousands):


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2004			Three Months Ended June 30, 2004
Gains (losses) on sales of mortgage assets	$	4,998		$	4,998
Fee income		(18,989	)		(11,729	)
General & administrative expenses		13,108			5,848

Note 12. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies

In the ordinary course of business, the Company sells loans with recourse for borrower defaults. For loans that have been sold with recourse that are no longer on the Company’s balance sheet, the recourse component is considered a guarantee. The Company sold no loans with recourse for borrower defaults for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $124.1 million and $12.1 million, respectively for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003. The Company’s reserve related to these guarantees totaled $47,000 and $41,000 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company sells loans with recourse where a defect occurred in the loan origination process and guarantees to cover investor losses should origination defects occur. Defects may occur in the loan documentation and underwriting process, either through processing errors made by the Company or through intentional or unintentional misrepresentation made by the borrower or agents during those processes. If a defect is identified, the Company is required to repurchase the loan. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had loans sold with recourse for origination defects with an outstanding principal balance of $8.2 billion. Repurchases of loans where a defect has occurred have been immaterial.

We have commitments to borrowers to fund residential mortgage loans as well as commitments to purchase and sell mortgage loans to third parties. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company had commitments to fund mortgage loans with agreed-upon rates of approximately $306 million and $228 million, respectively. We had outstanding commitments to purchase loans of $25 million and no commitments to sell loans to third parties at June 30, 2004. As of December 31, 2003, we had outstanding commitments to purchase loans of $60 million and no

commitments to sell loans to third parties. The commitments to originate and purchase loans do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, as some portion of the commitments are likely to expire without being drawn upon or may be subsequently declined for credit or other reasons.

In the normal course of its business, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims. The resolution of these legal proceedings and claims, in the opinion of management, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. Since April 2004, a number of substantially similar class action lawsuits and three derivative lawsuits have been filed in the United States District Court in Kansas City and in Missouri state court against the Company and/or several of its executive officers and/or directors. The complaints generally claim that the defendants are liable for making or failing to prevent alleged misstatements or omissions in the Company’s public disclosures. The Company believes that these claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them. In addition, the Company in April 2004 received notice of an informal inquiry from the Securities and Exchange Commission requesting that it provide various documents relating to its business. The Company is cooperating fully with the Commission’s inquiry.

Note 13. Earnings Per Share

The Board of Directors declared a two-for-one split of its common stock, providing shareholders of record as of November 17, 2003, with one additional share of common stock for each share owned. The additional shares resulting from the split were issued on December 1, 2003 increasing the number of common shares outstanding to 24.1 million shares. Prior year share amounts and earnings per share disclosures have been restated to reflect the stock split.

The computations of basic and diluted EPS for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,				For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2004		2003		2004		2003
Numerator	$	63,613	$	51,680	$	33,963	$	28,721

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic		24,817		21,402		24,978		21,800

Weighted average common shares outstanding – dilutive
Stock options		505		594		399		630
Restricted stock		16		—		—		—

Weighted average common shares outstanding – dilutive		25,338		21,996		25,377		22,430

Basic earnings per share	$	2.56	$	2.41	$	1.36	$	1.32

Diluted earnings per share	$	2.51	$	2.35	$	1.34	$	1.28

Note 14. Subsequent Events

On July 23, 2004, the Company issued asset-backed bonds in the amount of $157.5 million secured by the interest only, prepayment penalty and subordinated mortgage securities of NMFT 2004-1 and NMFT 2004-2 as a means for long-term financing. The mortgage securities are recorded as assets of the Company and the asset-backed bonds are recorded as debt. The performance of the mortgage loan collateral underlying these securities is the sole source of repayment of these asset-backed bonds. The interest rate on the asset-backed bonds is fixed at 4.458% and the estimated weighted average months to maturity is based on estimates and assumptions made by management. The actual maturity may differ from expectations.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the preceding consolidated financial statements of NovaStar Financial and the notes thereto as well as NovaStar Financial’s annual report to shareholders and annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

Safe Harbor Statement

“Safe Harbor” statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements in this discussion regarding NovaStar Financial, Inc. and its business, which are not historical facts, are “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties. Certain matters discussed in this quarterly report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that inherently include certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results and the time of certain events could differ materially from those projected in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including general economic conditions, fluctuations in interest rates, fluctuations in prepayment speeds, fluctuations in losses due to defaults on mortgage loans, the availability of non-conforming residential mortgage loans, the availability and access to financing and liquidity resources, and other risk factors outlined in the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. Other factors not presently identified may also cause actual results to differ. Management continuously updates and revises these estimates and assumptions based on actual conditions experienced. It is not practicable to publish all revisions and, as a result, no one should assume that results projected in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements will continue to be accurate in the future. Risks and uncertainties, which could cause results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements herein, are listed in the “Risk Management” section of the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

Overview of Performance

During the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, we reported net income of $66.6 million and $35.6 million, or $2.51 and $1.34 per diluted share, respectively as compared to $51.7 million and $28.7 million, or $2.35 and $1.28 per diluted share for the same periods of 2003. Our earnings were driven largely by the income generated by our mortgage securities portfolio, which increased from $300.9 million as of June 30, 2003 to $389.1 million as of June 30, 2004. These securities are retained in securitizations of the mortgage loans we originate. We securitized $3.1 billion of mortgage loans during the first six months of 2004 as compared to $2.4 billion during the same period of 2003. The increased volume of mortgage loans we securitized is directly attributable to the increase in our loan origination volume. During the first six months of 2004 and 2003, we originated $3.8 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively, in nonconforming, residential mortgage loans. We increased our loan production for the six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2003 through adding sales personnel primarily in new and underserved markets.

Summary of Operations and Key Performance Measurements

Our net income is highly dependent upon our mortgage securities portfolio, which is generated from the securitization of nonconforming loans we have originated. These mortgage securities represent the right to receive the net future cash flows from a pool of nonconforming loans. Generally speaking, the more nonconforming loans we originate, the larger our securities portfolio and, therefore, the greater earnings potential. As a result, earnings are largely dependent on the volume of nonconforming loans and related performance factors for those loans, including their average coupon, borrower default and borrower prepayment. Information regarding our lending volume is presented under the heading “Mortgage Loans.”

The primary function of our mortgage lending operations is to generate nonconforming loans, the majority of which will serve as collateral for our mortgage securities. While our mortgage lending operations generate sizable revenues in the form of gains on sales of mortgage loans and fee income from borrowers, the revenue serves largely to offset the related costs.

We also service the mortgage loans we originate and that serve as collateral for our mortgage securities. The servicing function is critical to the management of credit risk (risk of borrower default and the related economic loss) within our mortgage portfolio. Again, while this operation generates significant fee revenue, its revenue serves largely to offset the cost of this function.

The key performance measures for management are:

•

dollar volume of nonconforming mortgage loans originated

•

relative cost of the loans originated

•

characteristics of the loans (coupon, credit quality, etc.), which will indicate their expected yield

•

return on our mortgage asset investments and the related management of interest rate risk

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, along with other portions of this report, are designed to provide information regarding our performance and these key performance measures.

Known Material Trends

Over the last ten years, the nonconforming lending market has grown by approximately $265 billion to a market of approximately $290 billion in 2003 as estimated by the National Mortgage News. A significant portion of these loans are made to borrowers who are using equity in their primary residence to consolidate low-balance, installment or consumer debt. Additionally, this market has been very stable and growing through all interest rate environments, meaning that while interest rates have increased and decreased dramatically over that period, the base market for nonconforming loans has not increased or decreased in relationship to interest rates. Management estimates that NovaStar has a 2-3% market share. While management cannot predict consumer spending and borrowing habits, historical trends indicate that the market in which we operate is relatively stable and growing.

We depend on the capital markets to finance the mortgage loans we originate. The primary bonds we issue in our loan securitizations are sold to large, institutional investors. In the short-term, we finance our mortgage loans using “warehouse” lines of credit provided by commercial and investment banks. The equity marketplace provides capital to operate our business. The trend has been favorable in the capital markets for the types of securitization transactions we execute. Investor appetite for the bonds created has been strong. Additionally, commercial and investment banks have provided significant liquidity to finance our mortgage lending operations through warehouse facilities. While management cannot predict the future liquidity environment, we are unaware of any material reason to prevent continued liquidity support in the capital markets for our business. See the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion of liquidity risks and resources available to us.

Within the past year, the mortgage REIT industry has seen a significant increase in the desire for raising public capital. Additionally, there have been several new entrants to the mortgage REIT business and other mortgage lender conversions (or proposed conversions) to REIT status. This increased activity may impact the pricing and underwriting guidelines within the nonconforming marketplace. We have not changed our guidelines or pricing in response to this activity nor do we have any plans to make such changes.

State and local governing bodies are focused on the nonconforming lending business and the fees borrowers incur in obtaining a mortgage loan – generally termed “predatory lending” within the mortgage industry. In several instances, states or local governing bodies have imposed strict laws on lenders to curb predatory lending. To date, these laws have had an insignificant impact on our business. We have capped fee structures consistent with those adopted by federal mortgage agencies and have implemented rigid processes to ensure that our lending practices are not predatory in nature.

Description of Businesses

Mortgage Portfolio Management

•

We invest in assets generated primarily from our origination of nonconforming, single-family, residential mortgage loans.

•

We operate as a long-term portfolio investor.

•

Financing is provided by issuing asset-backed bonds and entering into reverse repurchase agreements.

•

Earnings are generated from the return on our mortgage securities and spread income on the mortgage loan portfolio.

•

Our mortgage securities include interest only, prepayment penalty, overcollateralization and other subordinated mortgage securities.

Earnings from our portfolio of mortgage loans and securities generate a substantial portion of our earnings. Gross interest income was $104.0 million and $53.7 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with $80.3 million and $41.0 million for the same period of 2003. Net interest income from the portfolio was $82.6 million and $42.9 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared to $60.2 million and $31.5 million during the same period of 2003. See our discussion of interest income under the heading “Results of Operations” and “Net Interest Income”.

A significant risk to our operations, relating to our portfolio management, is the risk that interest rates on our assets will not adjust at the same times or amounts that rates on our liabilities adjust. Many of the loans in our portfolio have fixed rates of interest for a period of time ranging from 2 to 30 years. Our funding costs are generally not constant or fixed. We use derivative instruments to mitigate the risk of our cost of funding increasing or decreasing at a faster rate than the interest on the loans (both those on the balance sheet and those that serve as collateral for mortgage securities).

In certain circumstances, because we enter into interest rate agreements that do not meet the hedging criteria set forth in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we are required to record the change in the value of derivatives as a component of earnings even though they may reduce our interest rate risk. In times where short-term rates rise or drop significantly, the value of our agreements will increase or decrease, respectively. As a result, we recognized gains on these derivatives of $1.7 million and $27.1 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with losses of $24.2 million and $15.0 million for the same period of 2003.

Mortgage Lending and Loan Servicing

The mortgage lending operation is significant to our financial results as it produces the loans that ultimately collateralize the mortgage securities that we hold in our portfolio. During the first six months of 2004, we originated $3.8 billion in nonconforming mortgage loans, the majority of which were retained in our servicing portfolio and serve as collateral for our securities. The loans we originate are sold, either in securitization transactions or in outright sales to third parties. We recognized gains on sales of mortgage assets totaling $77.0 million and $25.2 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with $73.5 million and $44.0 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2003. In securitization transactions accounted for as sales, we retain interest-only, prepayment penalty, overcollateralization and other subordinated securities, along with the right to service the loans.

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, NovaStar Mortgage, Inc., or NovaStar Mortgage, originates primarily nonconforming, single-family residential mortgage loans. In our nonconforming lending operations, we lend to individuals who generally do not qualify for agency/conventional lending programs because of a lack of available documentation or previous credit difficulties. These types of borrowers are generally willing to pay higher mortgage loan origination fees and interest rates than those charged by conventional lending sources. Because these borrowers typically use the proceeds of the mortgage loans to consolidate debt and to finance home improvements, education and other consumer needs, loan volume is generally less dependent on general levels of interest rates or home sales and therefore less cyclical than conventional mortgage lending.

Our nationwide loan origination network includes wholesale loan brokers, correspondent institutions and direct to consumer operations. We have developed a nationwide network of wholesale loan brokers and mortgage lenders who submit mortgage loans to us. Except for NovaStar Home Mortgage brokers described below, these brokers and mortgage lenders are independent from any of the NovaStar entities. Our sales force, which includes 285 account executives in 39 states, develops and maintains relationships with this network of independent retail brokers. Our correspondent origination channel consists of a network of institutions in which we purchase nonconforming mortgage loans on a bulk or flow basis. Our direct to consumer origination channel consists of call centers, which use telemarketing and internet loan lead sources to originate mortgage loans.

We underwrite, process, fund and service the nonconforming mortgage loans sourced through our broker network in centralized facilities. Further details regarding the loan originations are discussed under the “Mortgage Loans” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

A significant risk to our mortgage lending operations is liquidity risk – the risk that we will not have financing facilities and cash available to fund and hold loans prior to their sale or securitization. We maintain committed lending facilities with large banking and investment institutions to reduce this risk. On a short-term basis, we finance mortgage loans using warehouse lines of credit and repurchase agreements. In addition, we have access to facilities secured by our mortgage securities. Details regarding available financing arrangements and amounts outstanding under those arrangements are included in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

For long-term financing, we fund our mortgage loans using asset-backed bonds (ABB). Primary bonds – AAA through BBB rated – are issued to the public. We retain the interest only, prepayment penalty, overcollateralization and other subordinated bonds. We also retain the right to service the loans. Prior to 1999, our ABB transactions were executed and designed to meet accounting rules that resulted in securitizations being treated as financing transactions. The mortgage loans and related debt continue to be presented on our consolidated balance sheets, and no gain was recorded. Beginning in 1999, our securitization transactions have been structured to qualify as sales for accounting and income tax purposes. The loans and related bond liability are not recorded in our consolidated financial statements. We do, however, record the value of the securities and servicing rights we retain.

Loan servicing remains a critical part of our business operation. In the opinion of management, maintaining contact with our borrowers is critical in managing credit risk and in borrower retention. Nonconforming borrowers are more prone to late payments and are more likely to default on their obligations than conventional borrowers. By servicing our loans, we strive to identify problems with borrowers early and take quick action to address problems.

Borrowers may be motivated to refinance their mortgage loans either by improving their personal credit or due to a decrease in interest rates. By keeping in close touch with borrowers, we can provide them with information about company products to encourage them to refinance with us. Mortgage servicing yields fee income for us in the form of normal customer service and processing fees. We recognized $18.1 million and $9.7 million in loan servicing fee income from the securitization trusts during the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with $8.1 million and $4.4 million for the same periods of 2003. See also “Mortgage Loan Servicing” under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further discussion and analysis of the servicing operations.

Branch Operations

In 1999, we opened our retail mortgage broker business operating under the name NovaStar Home Mortgage, Inc., or NovaStar Home Mortgage. In December 2003, the Company determined it would terminate the LLC’s effective January 1, 2004. As of January 1, 2004, continuing branches that formerly operated under LLC agreements became operating units of the Company and their financial results are included in the consolidated financial statements. In order to improve the oversight and control over our branch locations in light of increasing federal and state regulatory scrutiny over the loan broker branch industry, we withdrew our membership from the LLC’s, which were established for most of our branches. In accordance with the terms of the LLC agreement, the LLC dissolves upon the withdrawal of any member. See Notes 1 and 9 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for further discussion. Branch offices offer conforming and nonconforming loans to potential borrowers. Loans are brokered for approved investors, including NovaStar Mortgage. The NHMI branches are considered departmental functions of NHMI under which the branch manager (department head) is an employee of NHMI and receives compensation based on the profitability of the branch (department) as bonus compensation. As of June 30, 2004 we had 342 active branches in 38 states as compared to 349 active branches reported as of June 30, 2003.

The branch business provides an additional source for mortgage loan originations that, in most cases, we will eventually sell, either in securitizations or in outright sales to third parties. During the first six months of 2004 and 2003, our branches brokered $3.5 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively, in loans, of which we funded $872.1 million and $463.7 million, respectively, in nonconforming loans. While the branches are not required to use NovaStar Mortgage as their nonconforming lender, they more often choose NovaStar Mortgage over external lenders. We believe the branch personnel will use NovaStar Mortgage so long as NovaStar Mortgage offers a competitive loan product and quality customer service. NovaStar Mortgage is the lender for a significantly higher percent of nonconforming loans initially brokered by the branches as compared to loans brokered by independent retailers.

Following is a diagram of the nonconforming industry in which we operate and our loan production during 2004 (in thousands).

LOGO

(A)

A portion of the loans securitized or sold to unrelated parties as of June 30, 2004 originated prior to 2004, but due to timing were not yet securitized or sold at the end of 2003. Loans originated in 2004 that we have not securitized or sold to unrelated parties as of June 30, 2004 are included in our mortgage loans held-for-sale

(B)

The AAA-BBB rated securities related to NMFT Series 2004-1 and 2004-2 were purchased by bond investors during the first six months of 2004.

(C)

The excess cash flow and subordinated bonds retained by NovaStar includes the securitization transactions that occurred during the first six months of 2004 for NMFT Series 2003-4, 2004-1 and 2004-2.

Significance of Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, therefore, are required to make estimates regarding the values of our assets and liabilities and in recording income and expenses. These estimates are based, in part, on our judgment and assumptions regarding various economic conditions that we believe are reasonable based on facts and circumstances existing at the time of reporting. The results of these estimates affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities and accumulated other comprehensive income at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income, expenses and other comprehensive income during the periods presented. The following summarizes the components of our consolidated financial statements where understanding accounting policies is critical to understanding and evaluating our reported financial results, especially given the significant estimates used in applying the policies. The discussion is intended to demonstrate the significance of estimates to our financial statements and the related accounting policies. Detailed accounting policies are provided in Note 1 to our 2003 consolidated financial statements. Our critical accounting estimates impact only two of our three reportable segments; our mortgage portfolio management and mortgage lending and loan servicing segments. Management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors and the audit committee has reviewed our disclosure.

Transfers of Assets (Loan and Mortgage Security Securitizations) and Related Gains. In a loan securitization, we combine the mortgage loans we originate in pools to serve as collateral for asset-backed bonds that are issued to the public. In a mortgage security securitization (also known as a “Resecuritization”), we combine mortgage securities retained in previous loan securitization transactions to serve as collateral for asset-backed bonds that are issued to the public. The loans or mortgage securities are transferred to a trust designed to serve only for the purpose of holding the collateral. The trust is considered a qualifying special purpose entity as defined by SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities – a

replacement of FASB Statement No. 125”. The owners of the asset-backed bonds have no recourse to us in the event the collateral does not perform as planned.

In order for us to determine proper accounting treatment for each securitization or resecuritization, we evaluate whether or not we have retained or surrendered control over the transferred assets by reference to the conditions set forth in SFAS No. 140. All terms of these transactions are evaluated against the conditions set forth in these statements. Some of the questions that must be considered include:

•

Have the transferred assets been isolated from the transferor?

•

Does the transferee have the right to pledge or exchange the transferred assets?

•

Is there a “call” agreement that requires the transferor to return specific assets?

•

Is there an agreement that both obligates and entitles the transferor to repurchase or redeem the transferred assets prior to maturity?

•

Have any derivative instruments been transferred?

Generally, we intend to structure our securitizations so that control over the collateral is transferred and the transfer is accounted for as a sale. For resecuritizations, we intend to structure these transactions to be accounted for as secured borrowings.

When these transfers are executed in a manner such that we have surrendered control over the collateral, the transfer is accounted for as a sale. In accordance with SFAS No. 140, a gain or loss on the sale is recognized based on the carrying amount of the financial assets involved in the transfer, allocated between the assets transferred and the retained interests based on their relative fair value at the date of transfer. In a loan securitization, we do retain the right to service the underlying mortgage loans and we also retain certain mortgage securities issued by the trust (see Mortgage Securities below). In a resecuritization, we retain an interest in a subordinated security that represents the right to receive the cash flows on the underlying mortgage security collateral after the senior bonds have been satisfied. As previously discussed, the gain recognized upon securitization (or resecuritization) depends on, among other things, the estimated fair value of the components of the securitization (or resecuritization) – the loans or mortgage securities transferred, the securities retained and the mortgage servicing rights. The estimated fair value of the securitization (or resecuritization) components is considered a “critical accounting estimate” as 1) these gains or losses represent a significant portion of our operating results and 2) the valuation assumptions used regarding economic conditions and the make-up of the collateral, including interest rates, principal payments, prepayments and loan defaults are highly uncertain and require a large degree of judgment.

We believe the best estimate of the initial value of the securities we retain in a whole loan securitization is derived from the market value of the pooled loans. The initial value of the loans is estimated based on the expected open market sales price of a similar pool. We occasionally accept bids on our whole loans in order to test the market price. In open market transactions, the purchaser has the right to reject loans at its discretion. In a loan securitization, loans cannot generally be rejected. As a result, we adjust the market price for the loans to compensate for the estimated value of rejected loans. The market price of the securities retained is derived by deducting the percent of net proceeds received in the securitization (i.e. the economic value of the loans transferred) from the estimated adjusted market price for the entire pool of the loans.

An implied yield (discount rate) is calculated based on the initial value derived above and using projected cash flows generated using assumptions for prepayments, expected credit losses and interest rates. We ensure the resulting implied yield is commensurate with current market conditions. Additionally, this yield serves as the initial accretable yield used to recognize income on the securities.

For purposes of valuing our mortgage securities, it is important to know that in recent securitization transactions we not only have transferred loans to the trust, but we have also transferred interest rate agreements to the trust with the objective of reducing interest rate risk within the trust. During the period before loans are transferred in a securitization transaction, as discussed under “Net Interest Income”, “Interest Rate/Market Risk” and “Hedging”, we enter into interest rate swap or cap agreements to reduce interest rate risk. We use interest rate cap and swap contracts to mitigate the risk of the cost of variable rate liabilities increasing at a faster rate than the earnings on assets during a period of rising rates. Certain interest rate agreements are then transferred into the trust at the time of securitization. The trust assumes the interest rate agreements and, therefore, the trust assumes the obligation to make payments and obtains the right to receive payments under these agreements.

In valuing our mortgage securities it is also important to understand what portion of the underlying mortgage loan collateral is covered by mortgage insurance. The cost of the insurance is paid by the trust from proceeds the trust receives from the underlying collateral. The trust legally assumes the responsibility to pay the mortgage insurance premiums and the rights to receive claims for credit losses. Therefore, we have no obligation to pay these insurance premiums. This information is significant for valuation as the mortgage insurance significantly reduces the credit losses born by the owner of the loan. Mortgage insurance claims on loans where a defect occurred in the loan origination process will not be paid by the mortgage insurer. The assumptions we use to value our mortgage securities consider this risk. We discuss mortgage insurance premiums under the heading “Premiums for Mortgage Loan Insurance”.

The weighted average whole loan market price used in the initial valuation of our retained securities was 103.96 and 103.48 during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The weighted average implied discount rate for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was 21% and 23%, respectively. If the whole loan market price used in the initial valuation of our mortgage securities in 2004 had been increased or decreased by 50 basis points, the initial value of our mortgage securities and the gain we recognized would have increased or decreased by approximately $15.4 million.

Information regarding the assumptions we used is discussed under “Mortgage Securities” in the following discussion.

When we do have the ability to exert control over the transferred collateral, the assets remain on our financial records and a liability is recorded for the related asset-backed bonds.

Mortgage Securities. Our mortgage securities represent beneficial interests we retain in securitization transactions. The beneficial interests we retain in securitization transactions primarily consist of the right to receive the future cash flows from a pool of securitized mortgage loans which include:

•

The interest spread between the coupon on the underlying loans and the cost of financing.

•

Prepayment penalties received from borrowers who payoff their loans early in their life.

•

Overcollateralization and other subordinated securities, which are designed to protect the primary bondholder from credit loss on the underlying loans.

The beneficial interests we retain in resecuritization transactions represent the right to receive the remaining cash flows from the underlying mortgage security collateral after the obligations to outside bondholders have been satisfied.

The cash flows we receive are highly dependent upon the interest rate environment. The cost of financing for the securitized loans is indexed to short-term interest rates, while the loan coupons are less interest sensitive. As a result, as rates rise and fall, our cash flows will fall and rise, which in turn will decrease or increase the value of our mortgage securities. Additionally, the cash flows we receive are dependent on the default and prepayment experience of the borrowers in underlying mortgage security collateral. Increasing or decreasing cash flows will increase or decrease the yield on our securities.

We believe the accounting estimates related to the valuation of our mortgage securities and establishing the rate of income recognition on mortgage securities are “critical accounting estimates” because they can materially affect net income and stockholders’ equity and require us to forecast interest rates, mortgage principal payments, prepayments and loan default assumptions which are highly uncertain and require a large degree of judgment. The rate used to discount the projected cash flows is also critical in the valuation of our mortgage securities. We use internal, historical collateral performance data and published forward yield curves when modeling future expected cash flows and establishing the rate of income recognized on mortgage securities. We believe the value of our mortgage securities is fair, but can provide no assurance that future prepayment and loss experience or changes in their required market discount rate will not require write-downs of the residual assets. Write-downs would reduce income of future periods.

As payments are received they are applied to the cost basis of the mortgage related security. Each period, the accretable yield for each mortgage security is evaluated and, to the extent there has been a change in the estimated cash flows, it is adjusted and applied prospectively. The estimated cash flows change as management’s assumptions for credit losses, borrower prepayments and interest rates are updated. The assumptions are established using internally developed models. We prepare analyses of the yield for each security using a range of these assumptions. The accretable yield used in recording interest income is generally set within a range of base assumptions. The accretable yield is recorded as interest income with a corresponding increase to the cost basis of the mortgage security.

At each reporting period subsequent to the initial valuation of the retained securities, the fair value of mortgage securities is estimated based on the present value of future expected cash flows to be received. Management’s best estimate of key assumptions, including credit losses, prepayment speeds, the market discount rates and forward yield curves commensurate with the risks involved, are used in estimating future cash flows. To the extent that the cost basis of mortgage securities exceeds the fair value and the unrealized loss is considered to be other than temporary, an impairment charge is recognized and the amount recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss is reclassified to earnings as a realized loss. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded an impairment loss of $6.1 million on NMFT Series 2004-1 as a result of the significant rise in short-term interest rates. Also contributing to the impairment is the fact that NMFT Series 2004-1 is a new security and it did not have a sizable unrealized gain to help absorb the decline in fair value, which was the case with our older securities. See Table 4 for a quarterly summary of the cost basis, unrealized gain (loss) and fair value of our mortgage securities.

During 2004, our average security yield has decreased to 33.4% and 32.4% for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, from 34.6% and 34.4% for the same period of 2003. This decrease is a result of the significant rise in short-term interest rates in the second quarter of 2004. Mortgage securities income has increased from $41.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $65.3 million for the same period of 2004 due to the increase in the average balance of our securities portfolio. If the rates used to accrue income on our mortgage securities during 2004 had increased or decreased by 10%, net income during the six months ended June 30, 2004 would have increased by $16.0 million and decreased by $16.8 million, respectively.

As of June 30, 2004, the weighted average discount rate used in valuing our mortgage securities was 21% as compared to 22% as of December 31, 2003. The weighted-average constant prepayment rate used in valuing our mortgage securities as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 was 33. If the discount rate used in valuing our mortgage securities as of June 30, 2004 had been increased by 500 basis points, the value of our mortgage securities would have decreased by $18.2 million. If we had decreased the discount rate used in valuing our mortgage securities by 500 basis points, the value of our mortgage securities would have increased $20.4 million.

Mortgage Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses. Mortgage loans held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or market determined on an aggregate basis. Mortgage loan origination fees and direct costs on mortgage loans held-for-sale are deferred until the related loans are sold. Premiums paid to acquire mortgage loans held-for-sale are also deferred until the related loans are sold. Mortgage loans held-in-portfolio are recorded at their cost, adjusted for the amortization of net deferred costs and for credit losses inherent in the portfolio. Mortgage loan origination fees and associated direct costs on mortgage loans held-in-portfolio are deferred and recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment to yield using the level yield method. Premiums paid to acquire mortgage loans held-in-portfolio are also deferred and recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment to yield using the level yield method. An allowance for credit losses is maintained for mortgage loans held-in-portfolio.

The allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, and therefore the related adjustment to income, is based on the assessment by management of various factors affecting our mortgage loan portfolio, including current economic conditions, the makeup of the portfolio based on credit grade, loan-to-value, delinquency status, mortgage insurance we purchase and other relevant factors. The allowance is maintained through ongoing adjustments to operating income. The assumptions used by management regarding key economic indicators are highly uncertain and involve a great deal of judgment.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Our objective and strategy for using derivative instruments is to mitigate the risk of increased costs on our variable rate liabilities during a period of rising rates (i.e. interest rate risk). Our primary goals for managing interest rate risk are to maintain the net interest margin between our assets and liabilities and diminish the effect of changes in general interest rate levels on our market value. We primarily enter into interest rate swap agreements and interest rate cap agreements to manage our sensitivity to changes in market interest rates. The interest rate agreements we use have an active secondary market, and none are obtained for a speculative nature, for instance, trading. These interest rate agreements are intended to provide income and cash flows to offset potential reduced net interest income and cash flows under certain interest rate environments. The determination of effectiveness is the primary assumption and estimate used in hedging. At trade date, these instruments and their hedging relationship are identified, designated and documented.

SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (as amended)”, standardizes the accounting for derivative instruments, including certain instruments embedded in other contracts, by requiring that an entity recognize those items as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measure them at fair value. If certain conditions are met, an entity may elect to designate a derivative instrument either as a cash flow hedge, a fair value hedge or a hedge of foreign currency exposure. SFAS No. 133 requires derivative instruments to be recorded at their fair value with hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings.

All of our derivative instruments that meet the hedge accounting criteria of SFAS No. 133 are considered cash flow hedges. We also have derivative instruments that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting. However, these instruments also contribute to our overall risk management strategy by serving to reduce interest rate risk on average short-term borrowings used to fund loans held-for-sale.

Any changes in fair value of derivative instruments related to hedge effectiveness are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. Changes in fair value of derivative instruments related to hedge ineffectiveness and non-hedge activity are recorded as adjustments to earnings. For those derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the fair value of the instruments are recorded as adjustments to earnings.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR). Originated MSR are recorded at allocated cost based upon the relative fair values of the transferred loans and the servicing rights. MSR are amortized in proportion to the projected net servicing revenue over the expected life of the related mortgage loans. Periodically, we evaluate the carrying value of originated MSR based on their estimated fair value. If the estimated fair value, using a discounted cash flow methodology, is less than the carrying amount of the mortgage servicing rights, the mortgage servicing rights are written down to the amount of the estimated fair value. For purposes of evaluating and measuring impairment of MSR we stratify the mortgage servicing rights based on their predominant risk characteristics. The most predominant risk characteristic considered is period of origination. The mortgage loans underlying the MSR are pools of homogeneous, nonconforming residential loans.

The fair value of MSR is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions. Changes in prepayment speed assumptions have the most significant impact on the fair value of MSR. Generally, as interest rates decline, prepayments accelerate due to increased refinance activity, which results in a decrease in the fair value of MSR. As

interest rates rise, prepayments slow down, which generally results in an increase in the fair value of MSR. All assumptions are reviewed for reasonableness on a quarterly basis and adjusted as necessary to reflect current and anticipated market conditions. Thus, any measurement of the fair value of MSR is limited by the existing conditions and the assumptions utilized as of a particular point in time. Those same assumptions may not be appropriate if applied at a different point in time.

Financial Condition as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003

Mortgage Loans. We classify our mortgage loans into two categories: “held-for-sale” and “held-in-portfolio”. Loans we have originated, but have not yet sold or securitized, are classified as “held-for-sale”. We expect to sell these loans outright in third party transactions or in securitization transactions that will be, for tax and accounting purposes, recorded as sales. We use warehouse lines of credit and mortgage repurchase agreements to finance our held-for-sale loans. As such, the fluctuations in mortgage loans held-for-sale and short-term borrowings between June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 is dependent on loans we have originated during the period as well as loans we have sold outright or through securitization transactions.

The volume and cost of our loan production is critical to our financial results. The loans we produce serve as collateral for our mortgage securities and generate gains as they are sold or securitized. The cost of our production is also critical to our financial results as it is a significant factor in the gains we recognize. The following table summarizes our loan production for 2004 and 2003. We discuss our cost of production under “General and Administrative Expenses” under “Results of Operations”. Also, details regarding mortgage loans sold or securitized and the gains recognized during 2004 can be found in the “Gains on Sales of Mortgage Assets and Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments” section of this document.

Table 1 — Nonconforming Loan Originations

(dollars in thousands, except for average loan balance)


	Number	Principal		Average Loan Balance		Price Paid to Broker		Weighted Average					Percent with Prepayment Penalty
	Number	Principal		Average Loan Balance		Price Paid to Broker		Loan to Value		FICO Score	Coupon		Percent with Prepayment Penalty
2004:
Second quarter	13,400	$	1,978,801	$	147,672	101.2	%	83	%	621	7.7	%	74	%
First quarter	12,137		1,783,119		146,916	101.3		82		622	7.4		74

Total	25,537	$	3,761,920	$	147,313	101.2	%	83	%	621	7.6	%	74	%

2003:
Fourth quarter	11,145	$	1,587,357	$	142,428	101.2	%	80	%	626	7.6	%	75	%
Third quarter	10,415		1,491,476		143,205	101.1		77		648	7.1		75
Second quarter	8,925		1,259,546		141,126	101.3		78		642	7.2		78
First quarter	6,426		912,599		142,017	101.3		78		638	7.5		80

Total	36,911	$	5,250,978	$	142,261	101.2	%	78	%	638	7.3	%	77	%

A portion of the mortgage loans on our balance sheet serve as collateral for asset-backed bonds we have issued and are classified as “held-in-portfolio.” The carrying value of “held-in-portfolio” mortgage loans as of June 30, 2004 was $74.7 million compared to $94.7 million as of December 31, 2003.

Premiums are paid on substantially all mortgage loans. Premiums on mortgage loans held-in-portfolio are amortized as a reduction of interest income over the estimated lives of the loans. For mortgage loans held-for-sale, premiums are deferred until the related loans are sold. To mitigate the effect of prepayments on interest income from mortgage loans, we generally strive to originate mortgage loans with prepayment penalties.

In periods of decreasing interest rates, borrowers are more likely to refinance their mortgages to obtain a better interest rate. Even in rising rate environments, borrowers tend to repay their mortgage principal balances earlier than is required by the terms of their mortgages. Nonconforming borrowers, as they update their credit rating, are more likely to refinance their mortgage loan to obtain a lower interest rate.

The operating performance of our mortgage loan portfolio, including net interest income, allowance for credit losses and effects of hedging, are discussed under “Results of Operations” and “Interest Rate/Market Risk.” Gains on the sales of mortgage loans, including impact of securitizations treated as sales, is also discussed under “Results of Operations.” Additional information relating to our loans held-in-portfolio and loans held-for-sale can be accessed via our website at www.novastarmortgage.com. Such information includes a summary of our loans held-in-portfolio and loans held-for-sale by FICO score and geographic concentration. For held-in-portfolio loans, loan performance characteristics such as credit quality and prepayment experience are also available.

Table 2 — Carrying Value of Mortgage Loans

(dollars in thousands)


	June 30, 2004			December 31, 2003
Held-in-portfolio:
Current principal	$	74,110		$	94,162

Premium	$	1,457		$	1,874

Coupon		10.0	%		10.0	%

Percent with prepayment penalty		—	%		—	%

Held-for-sale:
Current principal	$	1,356,444		$	687,880

Premium	$	13,590		$	10,112

Coupon		7.7	%		7.7	%

Percent with prepayment penalty		74	%		74	%

Mortgage Securities – Available-for-Sale. Since 1998, we have pooled the majority of the loans we have originated to serve as collateral for asset-backed bonds in securitizations that are treated as sales for accounting and tax purposes. In these transactions, the loans are removed from our balance sheet. However, we retain excess interest, prepayment penalty and subordinated principal securities. Additionally, we service the loans sold in these securitizations (see “Mortgage Servicing Rights” under the header “Financial Condition as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003”). As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the fair value of our mortgage securities was $389.1 million and $382.3 million, respectively. During the first six months of 2004, we executed securitizations totaling $3.1 billion in mortgage loans and retained mortgage securities with a value of $159.4 million. See Note 5 for a summary of the activity in our mortgage securities portfolio.

The value of our mortgage securities represents the present value of the securities’ cash flows that we expect to receive over their lives, considering estimated prepayment speeds and credit losses of the underlying loans, discounted at an appropriate risk-adjusted market rate of return. The cash flows are realized over the life of the loan collateral as cash distributions are received from the trust that owns the collateral.

In estimating the fair value of our mortgage securities, management must make assumptions regarding the future performance and cash flow of the mortgage loans collateralizing the securities. These estimates are based on management’s judgments about the nature of the loans. The cash flows we receive on our mortgage securities will be the net of the gross coupon and the bond cost less administrative costs (servicing and trustee fees) and the cost of mortgage insurance. Additionally, the trust is a party to interest rate agreements. Our cash flow will include (exclude) payments from (to) the interest rate agreement counterparty. Table 3 provides a summary of the critical assumptions used in estimating the cash flows of the collateral and the resulting estimated fair value of the mortgage securities.

During the past two years, interest expense on asset-backed bonds has been unexpectedly low. As a result, the spread between the coupon interest and the bond cost has been unusually high. As a result, our cost basis in many of our mortgage securities has been significantly reduced. For example, our cost basis in NMFT Series 2000-1 and 2001-1 has been reduced to zero (see Table 3). When our cost basis in the retained securities (interest only, prepayment penalty and subordinated securities) reaches zero, the remaining future cash flows received on the securities are recognized entirely as income.

The operating performance of our mortgage securities portfolio, including net interest income and effects of hedging are discussed under “Results of Operations” and “Interest Rate/Market Risk.” Additional information relating to our loans collateralizing our mortgage securities can be accessed via our website at www.novastarmortgage.com. Such information includes a summary of our loans collateralizing our mortgage securities by FICO score and geographic concentration, as well as, loan performance characteristics such as credit quality and prepayment experience.

Table 3 — Valuation of Individual Mortgage Securities and Assumptions (dollars in thousands)


	Cost		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)		Estimated Fair Value of Mortgage Securities		Current Assumptions						Assumptions at Trust Securitization
	Cost		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)		Estimated Fair Value of Mortgage Securities		Discount Rate		Constant Prepayment Rate		Expected Credit Losses (A)		Discount Rate		Constant Prepayment Rate		Expected Credit Losses (A)
June 30, 2004:
NMFT 1999-1
Subordinated securities	$	6,597	$	—	$	6,597	17	%	33	%	4.6	%	17	%	30	%	2.5	%

NMFT 2000-1
Interest only		—		1,317		1,317
Prepayment penalty		—		131		131
Subordinated securities		412		472		884

		412		1,920		2,332	15		37		1.1		15		27		1.0

NMFT 2000-2
Interest only		—		2,079		2,079
Prepayment penalty		—		133		133
Subordinated securities		—		1,029		1,029

		—		3,241		3,241	15		36		0.8		15		28		1.0

NMFT 2001-1
Interest only		—		4,991		4,991
Prepayment penalty		—		296		296
Subordinated securities		—		768		768

		—		6,055		6,055	20		34		1.1		20		28		1.2

NMFT 2001-2
Interest only		—		11,345		11,345
Prepayment penalty		—		876		876
Subordinated securities		321		2,634		2,955

		321		14,855		15,176	25		33		0.8		25		28		1.2

NMFT 2002-1
Interest only		4,783		2,263		7,046
Prepayment penalty		489		495		984
Subordinated securities		966		4,560		5,526

		6,238		7,318		13,556	20		37		1.0		20		32		1.7

NMFT 2002-2
Interest only		4,474		316		4,790
Prepayment penalty		461		165		626
Subordinated securities		1,427		1,647		3,074

		6,362		2,128		8,490	25		39		1.6		25		27		1.6


NMFT 2002-3
Interest only		13,264		423		13,687
Prepayment penalty		1,938		869		2,807
Subordinated securities		1,400		3,329		4,729

		16,602		4,621		21,223	20	39	0.9	20	30	1.0

NMFT 2003-1
Interest only		26,571		933		27,504
Prepayment penalty		5,437		752		6,189
Subordinated securities		10,514		167		10,681

		42,522		1,852		44,374	20	33	2.2	20	28	3.3

NMFT 2003-2
Interest only		29,163		95		29,258
Prepayment penalty		8,555		426		8,981
Subordinated securities		2,034		1,182		3,216

		39,752		1,703		41,455	28	33	2.2	28	25	2.7

NMFT 2003-3
Interest only		39,384		196		39,580
Prepayment penalty		8,981		922		9,903
Subordinated securities		5,955		377		6,332

		54,320		1,495		55,815	20	30	2.9	20	22	3.6

NMFT 2003-4 (B)
Interest only		39,270		373		39,643
Prepayment penalty		8,233		3,418		11,651

		47,503		3,791		51,294	20	36	3.9	20	30	5.1

NMFT 2004-1 (B)
Interest only		63,647		—		63,647
Prepayment penalty		9,857		684		10,541

		73,504		684		74,188	20	33	5.7	20	33	5.9

NMFT 2004-2
Interest only		39,173		64		39,237
Prepayment penalty		3,723		6		3,729
Subordinated securities		2,284		4		2,288

		45,180		74		45,254	22	32	5.1	22	32	5.1


Total	$	339,313	$	49,737	$	389,050

(A)	Represents expected credit losses for the life of the securitization up to the expected date in which the related asset-backed bonds can be called.

(B)	Due to the expected credit losses and mortgage insurance coverage on NMFT Series 2003-4 and 2004-1, the value of the subordinated securities is zero.


	Cost		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Estimated Fair Value of Mortgage Securities		Current Assumptions						Assumptions at Trust Securitization
	Cost		Net Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Estimated Fair Value of Mortgage Securities		Discount Rate		Constant Prepayment Rate		Expected Credit Losses (A)		Discount Rate		Constant Prepayment Rate		Expected Credit Losses (A)
December 31, 2003:
NMFT 1999-1
Subordinated securities	$	6,119	$	(101	)	$	6,018	17	%	39	%	5.2	%	17	%	30	%	2.5	%

NMFT 2000-1
Interest only		—		1,942			1,942
Prepayment penalty		—		244			244
Subordinated securities		299		708			1,007

		299		2,894			3,193	15		57		1.3		15		27		1.0

NMFT 2000-2
Interest only		—		3,074			3,074
Prepayment penalty		—		274			274
Subordinated securities		754		1,993			2,747

		754		5,341			6,095	15		63		1.0		15		28		1.0

NMFT 2001-1
Interest only		—		6,386			6,386
Prepayment penalty		—		518			518
Subordinated securities		—		1,629			1,629

		—		8,533			8,533	20		53		1.1		20		28		1.2

NMFT 2001-2
Interest only		—		16,343			16,343
Prepayment penalty		—		1,469			1,469
Subordinated securities		185		3,164			3,349

		185		20,976			21,161	25		41		0.9		25		28		1.2

NMFT 2002-1
Interest only		8,437		5,285			13,722
Prepayment penalty		550		937			1,487
Subordinated securities		1,183		3,444			4,627

		10,170		9,666			19,836	20		45	(B)	1.3		20		32		1.7


NMFT 2002-2
Interest only		7,093		1,489		8,582
Prepayment penalty		582		678		1,260
Subordinated securities		1,750		1,315		3,065

		9,425		3,482		12,907	25	44	(B)	1.8	25	27	1.6

NMFT 2002-3
Interest only		20,801		5,362		26,163
Prepayment penalty		1,348		1,662		3,010
Subordinated securities		2,225		1,847		4,072

		24,374		8,871		33,245	20	39	(B)	0.9	20	30	1.0

NMFT 2003-1
Interest only		47,352		2,280		49,632
Prepayment penalty		3,949		1,814		5,763
Subordinated securities		6,698		2,877		9,575

		57,999		6,971		64,970	20	28	(B)	2.8	20	28	3.3

NMFT 2003-2
Interest only		58,709		4,863		63,572
Prepayment penalty		3,042		2,513		5,555
Subordinated securities		25		265		290

		61,776		7,641		69,417	28	30	(B)	2.6	28	25	2.7

NMFT 2003-3
Interest only		72,637		3,128		75,765
Prepayment penalty		3,098		1,830		4,928
Subordinated securities		1,628		3,535		5,163

		77,363		8,493		85,856	20	26	(B)	3.4	20	22	3.6

NMFT 2003-4
Interest only		41,668		4,107		45,775
Prepayment penalty		4,430		61		4,491
Subordinated securities		—		790		790

		46,098		4,958		51,056	20	33	(B)	5.3	20	30	5.1


Total	$	294,562	$	87,725	$	382,287

(A)	Represents expected credit losses for the life of the securitization up to the expected date in which the related asset-backed bonds can be called.

(B)	Amounts have been corrected to properly reflect the constant prepayment rates used in the valuation of our mortgage securities as of December 31, 2003 based on the expected date in which the related asset-backed bonds can be called.

The following table summarizes the cost basis, unrealized gain (loss) and fair value of our mortgage securities with

the mortgage securities grouped by year of issue. For example, under the “Year of Issue for Mortgage Securities retained” column, the year 2003 is a combination of NMFT Series 2003-1, NMFT Series 2003-2, NMFT Series 2003-3 and NMFT Series 2003-4.

Table 4 — Summary of Mortgage Securities Retained by Year of Issue

(in thousands)


	2004
Year of Issue for Mortgage Securities Retained	As of June 30						As of March 31
	Cost		Unrealized Gain (Loss)		Fair Value		Cost		Unrealized Gain (Loss)		Fair Value
1999	$	6,597	$	—	$	6,597	$	6,353	$	185	$	6,538
2000		412		5,161		5,573		1,298		8,194		9,492
2001		321		20,910		21,231		233		27,579		27,812
2002		29,202		14,067		43,269		36,201		18,899		55,100
2003		184,097		8,841		192,938		226,676		16,090		242,766
2004		118,684		758		119,442		60,961		1,334		62,295

Total	$	339,313	$	49,737	$	389,050	$	331,722	$	72,281	$	404,003


	2003
Year of Issue for Mortgage Securities Retained	As of December 31							As of September 30							As of June 30							As of March 31
Year of Issue for Mortgage Securities Retained	Cost		Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Fair Value		Cost		Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Fair Value		Cost		Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Fair Value		Cost		Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Fair Value
1999	$	6,119	$	(101	)	$	6,018	$	6,014	$	(423	)	$	5,591	$	5,938	$	(363	)	$	5,575	$	5,864	$	(655	)	$	5,209
2000		1,053		8,235			9,288		1,040		10,154			11,194		1,289		11,929			13,218		2,327		12,352			14,679
2001		185		29,509			29,694		1,419		35,459			36,878		5,426		41,359			46,785		10,310		43,527			53,837
2002		43,969		22,019			65,988		50,848		25,869			76,717		58,883		27,345			86,228		66,928		26,775			93,703
2003		243,236		28,063			271,299		189,710		17,542			207,252		132,959		16,167			149,126		67,134		7,515			74,649

Total	$	294,562	$	87,725		$	382,287	$	249,031	$	88,601		$	337,632	$	204,495	$	96,437		$	300,932	$	152,563	$	89,514		$	242,077

Mortgage Servicing Rights. As discussed under “Mortgage Securities – Available for Sale”, we retain the right to service mortgage loans we originate and have securitized. Servicing rights for loans we sell to third parties are not retained and we have not purchased the right to service loans. As of June 30, 2004, we have $26.4 million in capitalized mortgage servicing rights compared with $19.7 million as of December 31, 2003. The value of the mortgage servicing rights we retained in our securitizations during the first six months of 2004 and 2003 was $13.9 million and $9.4 million, respectively. Amortization of mortgage servicing rights was $7.1 million and $3.9 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared to $3.7 million and $1.9 million for the same period of 2003.

Servicing Related Advances. Advances on behalf of borrowers for taxes, insurance and other customer service functions are made by NovaStar Mortgage and aggregated $20.8 million as of June 30, 2004 compared with $19.3 million as of December 31, 2003. These balances will generally increase as our assets and loan servicing balances increase.

Deposits with derivative instrument counterparties, net. Deposits with derivative instrument counterparties, net decreased from $19.5 million at December 31, 2003 to $19.4 million at June 30, 2004. Derivative instruments include the collateral (margin deposits) required under the terms of our derivative instrument contracts, net of the derivative instrument market values. Due to the nature of derivative instruments we use, the margin deposits required will generally increase as interest rates decline and decrease as interest rates rise. On the other hand, the market value of our derivative instruments will decline as interest rates decline and increase interest rates rise. Due to the rise in short-term interest rates in the second quarter of 2004, our margin deposits decreased $14.5 million and the market value of our derivative instruments increased $14.4 from December 31, 2003 to June 30, 2004.

Other Assets. Included in other assets are receivables from securitizations, deferred tax asset, assets acquired through foreclosure, accrued interest receivable and other miscellaneous assets. Our receivables from securitizations were $24.0 million and $6.2 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. These receivables represent cash due to us when we deliver the remaining $559.7 million in loans collateralizing NMFT 2004-2 in July 2004 as well as cash due to us on our mortgage securities. As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we had a net deferred tax asset of $10.5 million. As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we had 43 and 53 properties in real estate owned with a carrying value of $2.4 million and $3.2 million, respectively. Our accrued interest receivable as of June 30, 2004 was $6.8 million compared to $3.7 million as of December 31, 2003.

Short-term Financing Arrangements. Mortgage loan originations are funded with various financing facilities prior to securitization. Repurchase agreements are used as interim, short-term financing before loans are transferred in our securitization transactions. The balances outstanding under our short-term arrangements fluctuate based on lending volume, cash flows from operating, investing and other financing activities and equity transactions. As shown in Table 5, we have $211.3 million in immediately available funds, including $191.3 million in cash. We have borrowed approximately $1.5 billion of the $2.6 billion in committed lines of credit and mortgage securities repurchase facilities, leaving approximately $1.1 billion available to support the mortgage lending and mortgage portfolio operations. See the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a further discussion of liquidity risks and resources available to us.

Table 5 — Short-term Financing Resources

(in thousands)


	Credit Limit		Lending Value of Collateral		Borrowings		Availability
Unrestricted cash							$	191,291
Lines of credit and mortgage and securities repurchase facilities	$	2,575,000	$	1,532,537	$	1,512,538	$	19,999

Total.	$	2,575,000	$	1,532,537	$	1,512,538	$	211,290

Asset-backed Bonds. During 1997 and 1998, we completed the securitization of loans in transactions that were structured as financing arrangements for accounting purposes. These non-recourse financing arrangements match the loans with the financing arrangement for long periods of time, as compared to lines of credit and repurchase agreements that mature frequently with interest rates that reset frequently and have liquidity risk in the form of margin calls. Under the terms of our asset-backed bonds we are entitled to repurchase the mortgage loan collateral and repay the remaining bond obligations when the aggregate collateral principal balance falls below 35% of their original balance for the loans in NHES 97-01 and 25% for the loans in NHES 97-02, 98-01 and 98-02. We have not exercised our right to repurchase any loans and repay bond obligations.

On February 19, 2004, we issued asset-backed bonds in the amount of $156.6 million secured by the interest only, prepayment penalty and subordinated mortgage securities of NMFT 2003-3 and NMFT 2003-4 as a means for long-term financing. The mortgage securities are recorded as assets and the asset-backed bonds are recorded as debt. The resecuritizations were structured as secured borrowings for financial reporting and income tax purposes. In accordance with SFAS No. 140, control over the transferred assets was not surrendered and thus the transaction was considered a financing for the mortgage securities.

Accounts Payable and Other Liabilities. Included in accounts payable and other liabilities is the provision for removal of loans from securitization trusts, accrued payroll, income taxes payable and other liabilities. A provision within the trust for each of our securitization transactions gives us the right, not the obligation, to repurchase loans from the trust that are between 90 and 119 days delinquent. In accordance with SFAS No. 140, we are required to record the loans that meet this definition and a corresponding liability to the trust on our balance sheet at fair value. As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, our liability related to this provision was $20.0 million and $14.5 million, respectively. This liability should generally increase as we continue to securitize the loans we originate. Our accrued payroll increased from $18.1 million at December 31, 2003 to $31.1 million at June 30, 2004. The increase in accrued payroll is due to our change from a semi-monthly payroll to a bi-weekly payroll. Our current income tax liability was $5.6 million as of June 30, 2004 compared with $7.9 million as of December 31, 2003. This decline is attributable to the decrease in income before taxes of NFI Holding Corporation and the timing of our tax payments.

Stockholders’ Equity. The Board of Directors declared a two-for-one split of its common stock, providing shareholders of record as of November 17, 2003, with one additional share of common stock for each share owned. The additional shares resulting from the split were issued on December 1, 2003 increasing the number of common shares outstanding to 24.1 million shares. Prior year share amounts and earnings per share disclosures have been restated to reflect the stock split.

The increase in our stockholders’ equity as of June 30, 2004 compared to December 31, 2003 is a result of the following:

•

$66.6 million increase due to net income recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2004.

•

$38.0 million decrease due to decrease in unrealized gains on mortgage securities classified as available-for-sale.

•

$2.6 million increase due to net settlements on cash flow hedges reclassified to earnings.

•

$0.4 million decrease due to increase in unrealized losses on derivative instruments used in cash flow hedges.

•

$11.9 million increase due to issuance of common stock.

•

$72.1 million increase due to issuance of preferred stock.

•

$2.7 million increase due to compensation recognized under stock option plan.

•

$1.7 million increase due to exercise of stock options.

•

$67.6 million decrease due to dividends accrued or paid on common stock.

•

$2.9 million decrease due to dividends accrued or paid on preferred stock.

•

$0.1 increase due to forgiveness of founders’ notes receivable.

Results of Operations

During the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, we earned net income of $66.6 million and $35.6 million, or $2.51 and $1.34 per diluted share, respectively, compared with net income of $51.7 million and $28.7 million, or $2.35 and $1.28 per diluted share for the same period of 2003.

Our primary sources of revenue are interest earned on our mortgage loan and securities portfolios, fees from borrowers and gains on the sales and securitizations of mortgage loans. Earnings increased during 2004 as compared to 2003 due primarily to higher volumes of average mortgage securities held and mortgage loan originations securitized. The effects of the higher mortgage security volume is displayed in Table 6. Details regarding higher mortgage loan origination volumes and gains on securitization of these assets are shown in Tables 1, 9 and 10.

Net Interest Income

Our securities primarily represent our ownership in the net cash flows of the underlying mortgage loan collateral in excess of bond expenses and cost of funding. The cost of funding is indexed to one-month LIBOR and resets monthly while the coupon on the mortgage loan collateral adjusts more slowly depending on the

contractual terms of the loan. In 2002, we began transferring interest rate agreements at the time of securitization into the securitization trusts to help reduce this interest rate risk and to decrease the volatility of the future cash flows on our mortgage securities. As a result, future interest income on our mortgage securities is expected to be less volatile. The spreads on our newer mortgage securities have returned to expected or normal levels as a result of this interest rate risk management strategy and also as a result of the coupon on the mortgage loans adjusting downward. Since we did not transfer interest rate agreements into the trusts prior to 2002, our older securities continue to experience high yields as a result of the dramatic decrease in one-month LIBOR in 2002 and the first half of 2003. However, the increase in one-month LIBOR in the second quarter of 2004 has caused our overall securities yields to decrease from the yields we were experiencing in 2003.

While the spreads on our securities have decreased, the overall interest income continues to be high due to the sizeable increase in our mortgage securities retained. Based on these factors, as shown in Table 6, we experienced a decrease in the average net yield on our securities from 31.8% and 32.0% for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to 29.7% and 28.7% for the same period of 2004.

The overall dollar volume of interest income has increased primarily because the size of our mortgage securities portfolio has increased significantly during the past year. As shown in Tables 6 and 7, the average value of our mortgage securities increased from $240.6 million and $271.5 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively to $391.8 million and $396.5 million during the same period of 2004. The average balance of mortgage loans collateralizing our securities increased from $3.2 billion and $3.7 billion during the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 to $7.3 billion and $7.8 billion during the six and three months ended June 30, 2004. We expect to increase the amount of mortgage securities we own as we securitize the mortgage loans we originate.

As previously discussed, the trust that issues our interest-only securities owns interest rate agreements. These agreements reduce interest rate risk within the trust and, as a result, the cash flows we receive on our interest-only securities are less volatile as interest rates change.

Net interest income on mortgage loans represents income on loans held-for-sale during their warehouse period as well as loans held-in-portfolio, which are maintained on our balance sheet as a result of the four securitization transactions we executed in 1997 and 1998. Net interest income on mortgage loans before other expense increased from $21.9 million and $9.8 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 to $24.4 million and $14.5 million for the same period of 2004. The net interest income from mortgage loans is primarily driven by loan volume and the amount of time held-for-sale loans are in the warehouse.

Future net interest income will be dependent upon the size and volume of our mortgage securities and loan portfolios and economic conditions.

Table 6 is a summary of the interest income and expense related to our mortgage securities and the related yields as a percentage of the fair market value of these securities for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.

Table 6 — Mortgage Securities Interest Analysis

(dollars in thousands)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2004			2003			2004			2003
Average fair market value of mortgage securities	$	391,780		$	240,629		$	396,527		$	271,505
Average borrowings		309,568			182,023			333,926			127,331

Interest income	$	65,333		$	41,675		$	32,137		$	23,357
Interest expense		7,186			3,367			3,646			1,624

Net interest income	$	58,147		$	38,308		$	28,491		$	21,733

Yields:
Interest income		33.4	%		34.6	%		32.4	%		34.4	%
Interest expense		4.6			3.7			4.4			5.1

Net interest spread		28.8	%		30.9	%		28.0	%		29.3	%

Net Yield		29.7	%		31.8	%		28.7	%		32.0	%

All of NovaStar’s portfolio income comes from mortgage loans either directly (mortgage loans held-in-portfolio) or indirectly (mortgage securities). Table 7 attempts to look through the balance sheet presentation of

our portfolio income and present income as a percentage of average assets under management. This metric allows us to be more easily compared to other finance companies or financial institutions that use on balance sheet portfolio accounting, where return on assets is a common performance calculation.

The net interest income for mortgage securities, mortgage loans held-for-sale and mortgage loans held-in-portfolio reflect the income after interest expense, hedging, prepayment penalty income and credit expense (mortgage insurance and provision to loss reserve). Table 7 shows the net yield in both assets under management and the return on assets during the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.

Table 7 — Mortgage Portfolio Management Net Interest Income Analysis

(dollars in thousands)


For the Six Months Ended:	Mortgage Securities			Mortgage Loans Held-for- Sale			Mortgage Loans Held-in- Portfolio			Total
June 30, 2004
Interest income	$	65,333		$	34,910		$	3,792		$	104,035
Interest expense:
Short-term borrowings (A)		2,343			10,992			—			13,335
Asset-backed bonds		4,843			—			691			5,534
Cash flow hedging net settlements		—			1,023			1,558			2,581

Total interest expense		7,186			12,015			2,249			21,450

Mortgage portfolio net interest income before other expense		58,147			22,895			1,543			82,585
Other expense (B)		—			(11,460	)		(954	)		(12,414	)

Mortgage portfolio net interest income	$	58,147		$	11,435		$	589		$	70,171

Average balance of the underlying loans	$	7,292,642		$	918,592		$	80,319		$	8,291,553
Net interest yield on assets		1.59	%		2.49	%		1.47	%		1.69	%

June 30, 2003
Interest income	$	41,675		$	32,621		$	6,016		$	80,312
Interest expense:
Short-term borrowings (A)		1,370			10,522			—			11,892
Asset-backed bonds		1,997			—			1,371			3,368
Cash flow hedging net settlements		—			1,377			3,441			4,818

Total interest expense		3,367			11,899			4,812			20,078

Mortgage portfolio net interest income before other expense		38,308			20,722			1,204			60,234
Other expense (B)		—			(4,895	)		(171	)		(5,066	)

Mortgage portfolio net interest income	$	38,308		$	15,827		$	1,033		$	55,168

Average balance of the underlying loans	$	3,232,271		$	852,874		$	130,426		$	4,215,571
Net interest yield on assets		2.37	%		3.71	%		1.58	%		2.62	%


For the Three Months Ended:
June 30, 2004
Interest income	$	32,137		$	19,794		$	1,745		$	53,676
Interest expense:
Short-term borrowings (A)		1,151			6,237			—			7,388
Asset-backed bonds		2,495			—			327			2,822
Cash flow hedging net settlements		—			304			215			519

Total interest expense		3,646			6,541			542			10,729

Mortgage portfolio net interest income before other expense		28,491			13,253			1,203			42,947
Other expense (B)		—			(5,605	)		(663	)		(6,268	)

Mortgage portfolio net interest income	$	28,491		$	7,648		$	540		$	36,679

Average balance of the underlying loans	$	7,814,961		$	1,057,906		$	76,612		$	8,949,479
Net interest yield on assets		1.46	%		2.89	%		2.82	%		1.64	%

June 30, 2003
Interest income	$	23,357		$	14,790		$	2,849		$	40,996
Interest expense:
Short-term borrowings (A)		810			5,056			—			5,866
Asset-backed bonds		814			—			604			1,418
Cash flow hedging net settlements		—			695			1,470			2,165

Total interest expense		1,624			5,751			2,074			9,449

Mortgage portfolio net interest income before other expense		21,733			9,039			775			31,547
Other expense (B)		—			(2,992	)		(208	)		(3,200	)

Mortgage portfolio net interest income	$	21,733		$	6,047		$	567		$	28,347

Average balance of the underlying loans	$	3,736,833		$	796,961		$	124,011		$	4,657,805
Net interest yield on assets		2.33	%		3.04	%		1.83	%		2.43	%

(A)	Primarily includes mortgage loan and securities repurchase agreements.

(B)	Other expense includes prepayment penalty income, net settlements on non-cash flow hedges and credit expense (mortgage insurance and provision for credit losses).

Impact of Interest Rate Agreements. We have executed interest rate agreements designed to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk on short-term borrowings. Interest rate cap agreements require us to pay either a one-time “up front” premium or a quarterly premium, while allowing us to receive a rate that adjusts with LIBOR when rates rise above a certain agreed-upon rate. Interest rate swap agreements allow us to pay a fixed rate of interest while receiving a rate that adjusts with one-month LIBOR. These agreements are used to alter, in effect, the interest rates on funding costs to more closely match the yield on interest-earning assets. We incurred expenses of $12.8 million and $5.3 million related to the net settlements of our interest rate agreements for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with $8.2 million and $3.8 million for the same period of 2003. Fluctuations in these expenses are solely dependent upon the movement in LIBOR as well as our average notional amount outstanding.

Credit (Losses) Recoveries

We originate and own loans in which the borrower possesses credit risk higher than that of conforming borrowers. Delinquent loans and losses are expected to occur. Provisions for credit losses are made in amounts considered necessary to maintain an allowance at a level sufficient to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Charge-offs are recognized at the time of foreclosure by recording the value of real estate owned property at its estimated realizable value. One of the principal methods used to estimate expected losses is a delinquency migration analysis. This analysis takes into consideration historical information regarding foreclosure and loss severity experience and applies that information to the portfolio at the reporting date.

We use several techniques to mitigate credit losses including pre-funding audits by quality control personnel and in-depth appraisal reviews. Another loss mitigation technique allows a borrower to sell their property for less than the outstanding loan balance prior to foreclosure in transactions known as short sales, when it is believed that the resulting loss is less than what would be realized through foreclosure. Loans are charged off in full when the cost of pursuing foreclosure and liquidation exceed recorded balances. While short

sales have served to reduce the overall severity of losses incurred, they also accelerate the timing of losses. As discussed further under the caption “Premiums for Mortgage Loan Insurance”, lender paid mortgage insurance is also used as a means of managing credit risk exposure. Generally, the exposure to credit loss on insured loans is considered minimal.

During the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 we recognized credit losses of $661,000 and $515,000, respectively, compared with recoveries of $263,000 and $171,000 for the same period of 2003. We incurred net charge-offs of $1.1 million and $823,000 for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with $329,000 and $212,000 for the same period of 2003. A rollforward of the allowance for credit losses is presented in Table 8.

Table 8 — Quarterly Activity - Allowance for Credit Losses

(in thousands)


	2004						2003
	June 30			March 31			December 31			September 30			June 30			March 31
Beginning balance	$	1,210		$	1,319		$	1,420		$	2,444		$	2,827		$	3,036
Credit losses (recoveries)		515			146			749			(875	)		(171	)		(92	)
Amounts charged off, net of recoveries		(823	)		(255	)		(850	)		(149	)		(212	)		(117	)

Ending balance	$	902		$	1,210		$	1,319		$	1,420		$	2,444		$	2,827

Fee Income

Fee income in 2004 primarily consists of broker fees and service fee income. During 2003, affiliated branch management fees were also a component of fee income. Due to the elimination of the LLC’s and their subsequent inclusion in the consolidated financial statements, branch management fees are eliminated in consolidation in 2004.

Broker fees are paid by borrowers and other lenders for placing loans with third party investors (lenders) and are based on negotiated rates with each lender to whom we broker loans. Revenue is recognized upon loan origination.

Service fees are paid to us by either the investor on mortgage loans serviced or the borrower. Fees paid by investors on loans serviced are determined as a percentage of the principal collected for the loans serviced and are recognized in the period in which payments on the loans are received. Fees paid by borrowers on loans serviced are considered ancillary fees related to loan servicing and include late fees, processing fees and, for loans held-in-portfolio, prepayment penalties. Revenue is recognized on fees received from borrowers when an event occurs that generates the fee and they are considered to be collectible.

Affiliated branch management fees, a source of fee income in 2003, were charged to affiliated mortgage brokers to manage their administrative operations, which included providing accounting, payroll, human resources, loan investor management and license management services. The amount of the fees was agreed upon when entering a contractual agreement with affiliated mortgage brokers and were recognized as services were rendered. Affiliated branch management fees were $5.6 million and $3.3 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003.

Overall, fee income increased from $34.2 million and $19.7 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 to $88.8 million and $43.2 million for the same period of 2004 due primarily to the termination of the LLC’s and the inclusion of those branches in our consolidated financial statements. This had a significant impact on fee income due to the volume of broker fee income that these branches generate. For comparative purposes, if the LLC’s had been operating units during 2003 fee income would have been $77.9 million and $44.4 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.

Additionally, fee income increased due to the increase in our servicing portfolio from $5.1 billion as of June 30, 2003 to $9.6 billion as of June 30, 2004.

Gains on Sales of Mortgage Assets and Losses on Derivative Instruments

We execute securitization transactions in which we transfer mortgage loan collateral to an independent trust. The trust holds the mortgage loans as collateral for the securities it issues to finance the sale of the mortgage loans. In those transactions, certain securities are issued to entities unrelated to us, and we retain the interest-only and non-investment grade subordinated securities. In addition, we continue to service the loan collateral. These transactions were structured as sales for accounting and income tax reporting during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Whole loan sales have also been executed whereby we sell loans to third parties. In the outright sales of mortgage loans, we retain no assets or servicing rights. Table 10 provides a summary of mortgage loans sold outright and transferred in securitizations.

We have entered into derivative instrument contracts that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting treatment, but contribute to our overall risk management strategy by serving to reduce interest rate risk related to short-term borrowing rates. Changes in the fair value of these derivative instruments are credited or charged to current earnings. As interest rates have increased, we recognized gains of $1.7 million and $27.1 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with losses of $24.2 million and $15.0 million for the same period of 2003, reflective of the corresponding decrease in fair value of these non-hedge derivative instruments.

Table 9 provides the components of our gains on sales of mortgage assets and losses on derivative instruments.

Table 9 — Gains on Sales of Mortgage Assets and Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments

(in thousands)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,					For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2004		2003			2004			2003
Gains on sales of mortgage loans transferred in securitizations	$	75,980	$	66,345		$	24,888		$	41,389
Gains on sales of mortgage loans to third parties – nonconforming		—		2,976			—			101
Gains on sales of mortgage loans to third parties – conforming		851		5,152			365			3,312
Gain (losses) on sales of real estate owned		123		(999	)		(79	)		(771	)

Gains on sales of mortgage assets		76,954		73,474			25,174			44,031
Gains (losses) on derivatives		1,717		(24,186	)		27,115			(15,037	)

Net gains on sales of mortgage assets and derivative instruments	$	78,671	$	49,288		$	52,289		$	28,994

Table 10 — Mortgage Loan Sales and Securitizations

(dollars in thousands)


	Outright Mortgage Loan Sales (A)
For the Year Ended December 31,	Principal Amount		Percent of Total Sales		Net Gain Recognized		Weighted Average Price To Par
2004:
There were no outright mortgage loan sales in 2004.

2003:
Fourth quarter	$	—	—	%	$	—	—
Third quarter		27,085	2.1			428	102.7
Second quarter		12,057	0.9			101	105.3
First quarter		112,068	9.4			2,875	104.3

Total	$	151,210	2.8	%	$	3,404	104.1


	Mortgage Loans Transferred in Securitizations
									Weighted Average Assumptions Underlying Initial Value of Mortgage Securities
For the Year Ended December 31,	Principal Amount		Percent of Total Sales		Net Gain Recognized		Initial Value of Mortgage Securities		Constant Prepayment Rate	Discount Rate		Expected Total Credit Losses, Net of Mortgage Insurance
2004:
Second quarter	$	1,367,430	100.0	%	$	24,888	$	77,695	32	21	%	5.30	%
First quarter		1,702,658	100.0			51,092		85,270	32	20		5.69

Total	$	3,070,088	100.0	%	$	75,980	$	162,965	32	21	%	5.52	%

2003:
Fourth quarter	$	1,668,780	100.0	%	$	37,104	$	86,166	28	20	%	4.64	%
Third quarter		1,251,016	97.9			32,853		70,793	23	22		3.33
Second quarter		1,314,733	99.1			41,389		73,053	26	26		2.81
First quarter		1,084,906	90.6			24,956		69,740	28	20		3.30

Total	$	5,319,435	97.2	%	$	136,302	$	299,752	26	22	%	3.61	%

(A)	Does not include conforming loan sales.

Premiums for Mortgage Loan Insurance

The use of mortgage insurance is one method of managing the credit risk in the mortgage asset portfolio. Premiums for mortgage insurance on loans maintained on our balance sheet are paid by us and are recorded as a portfolio cost and included in the income statement under the caption “Premiums for Mortgage Loan Insurance”. These premiums totaled $1.6 million and $1.0 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with $2.0 million and $1.2 million for the same period of 2003. We received mortgage insurance proceeds on claims filed of $1.5 million and $0.4 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with $0.4 million and $0.1 million for the same period of 2003.

Some of the mortgage loans that serve as collateral for our mortgage securities carry mortgage insurance. When loans are securitized in transactions treated as sales, the obligation to pay mortgage insurance premiums is legally assumed by the trust. Therefore, we have no obligation to pay for mortgage insurance premiums on these loans.

We intend to continue to use mortgage insurance coverage as a credit management tool as we continue to originate and securitize mortgage loans. Mortgage insurance claims on loans where a defect occurred in the loan origination process will not be paid by the mortgage insurer. The assumptions we use to value our mortgage securities consider this risk. The percentage of loans with mortgage insurance has decreased in 2004 and 2003

and generally should be lower than 50% in the future. For the 2004-1 and 2004-2 securitizations, the mortgage loans that were transferred into the trusts had mortgage insurance coverage at the time of transfer of 26% and 38%, respectively. We have the risk that mortgage insurance providers will revise their guidelines to an extent where we will no longer be able to acquire coverage on all of our new production. Similarly, the providers may also increase insurance premiums to a point where the cost of coverage outweighs its benefit. We monitor the mortgage insurance market and currently anticipate being able to obtain affordable coverage to the extent we deem it is warranted.

General and Administrative Expenses

The main categories of our general and administrative expenses are compensation and benefits, loan expense, marketing, office administration and professional and outside services. Compensation and benefits includes employee base salaries, benefit costs and incentive compensation awards. Discussion on stock-based compensation expense included in compensation and benefits is in Note 3. Loan expense primarily includes expenses relating to the underwriting of mortgage loans that do not fund successfully. Marketing primarily includes costs of purchased loan leads, advertising and business promotion. Office administration includes items such as rent, depreciation, telephone, office supplies, postage, delivery, maintenance and repairs. Professional and outside services include fees for legal, accounting and other consulting services.

The increase in general and administrative expenses from $82.9 million and $47.0 million during the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 to $169.9 million and $89.5 million for the same period in 2004 is primarily attributable to the termination of the LLC’s and the inclusion of those branches in our consolidated financial statements. Our new retail lines of business, growth in our wholesale business and our expanding servicing operations also contributed to the increase in general and administrative expenses. We employed 1,505 people as of June 30, 2004 compared with 1,311 as of June 30, 2003 in our mortgage portfolio management and mortgage lending and loan servicing operations.

Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements presents a condensed income statement for our three segments, detailing our expenses by segment. For comparative purposes, Table 11 presents the general and administrative expenses assuming the LLC’s had been included in our consolidated financial statements during 2003.

Table 11 — General and Administrative Expenses

(dollars in thousands)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,				For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2004		2003 Pro Forma		2004		2003 Pro Forma
Compensation and benefits	$	87,609	$	67,236	$	43,783	$	37,766
Marketing		33,019		34,530		17,313		19,883
Office administration		22,906		14,997		12,646		8,124
Loan expense		11,375		10,817		7,549		7,303
Professional and outside services		6,106		3,011		3,724		1,482
Other		8,874		5,505		4,491		2,678

Total general and administrative expenses	$	169,889	$	136,096	$	89,506	$	77,236

Employees		4,402		3,655		4,402		3,655

The loan costs of production table below includes all costs paid and fees collected during the loan origination cycle, including loans that do not fund. This distinction is important as we can only capitalize as deferred broker premium and costs, those costs (net of fees) directly associated with a “funded” loan. Costs associated with loans that do not fund are recognized immediately as a component of general and administrative expenses. For loans held-for-sale, deferred net costs are recognized when the related loans are sold outright or transferred in securitizations. For loans held-in-portfolio, deferred net costs are recognized over the life of the loan as a reduction to interest income. The cost of our production is also critical to our financial results as it is a significant factor in the gains we recognize. Increased efficiencies in the nonconforming lending operation correlate to lower general and administrative costs and higher interest income and gain on sales of mortgage assets.

Table 12 — Wholesale Loan Costs of Production, as a Percent of Principal


	Gross Loan Production	Premium Paid to Broker, Net of Fees Collected	Total Acquisition Cost
2004:
Second quarter	1.71	0.72	2.43
First quarter	1.84	0.82	2.66

2003:
Fourth quarter	1.66	0.77	2.43
Third quarter	1.59	0.61	2.20
Second quarter	1.71	0.72	2.43
First quarter.	1.85	0.75	2.60

Mortgage Loan Servicing

Loan servicing is a critical part of our business. In the opinion of management, maintaining contact with borrowers is vital in managing credit risk and in borrower retention. Nonconforming borrowers are prone to late payments and are more likely to default on their obligations than conventional borrowers. We strive to identify issues and trends with borrowers early and take quick action to address such matters. Our annualized costs of servicing per unit decreased from $319 and $315 for the six and three months ended June 30, 2003 to $289 and $291 for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004.

Table 13 — Summary of Servicing Operations

(dollars in thousands, except per loan cost and number of loans)


	2004
	June 30 Amount			Per Unit			March 31 Amount			Per Unit
Unpaid principal	$	9,604,342					$	8,428,852

Number of loans		70,942						62,600

Servicing income, before amortization of mortgage servicing rights	$	8,277		$	467		$	7,985		$	510
Costs of servicing		5,160			291			5,107			326

Net servicing income, before amortization of mortgage servicing rights		3,117			176			2,878			184
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights		3,854			217			3,283			210

Net servicing income (loss)	$	(737	)	$	(41	)	$	(405	)	$	(26	)


	2003
	December 31 Amount			Per Unit			September 30 Amount			Per Unit			June 30 Amount			Per Unit			March 31 Amount			Per Unit
Unpaid principal	$	7,206,113					$	6,161,345					$	5,145,005					$	4,212,986

Number of loans		54,196						46,692						39,452						32,835

Servicing income, before amortization of mortgage servicing rights	$	6,359		$	469		$	5,265		$	451		$	4,600		$	466		$	4,262		$	519
Costs of servicing		4,384			323			3,591			308			3,108			315			3,178			387

Net servicing income, before amortization of mortgage servicing rights		1,975			146			1,674			143			1,492			151			1,084			132
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights		2,790			206			2,554			219			1,925			195			1,726			210

Net servicing income (loss)	$	(815	)	$	(60	)	$	(880	)	$	(76	)	$	(433	)	$	(44	)	$	(642	)	$	(78	)

Income Taxes

NovaStar Financial intends to continue to operate and qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) under the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, it will generally not be subject to federal income taxes at the corporate level on taxable income distributed to stockholders. Requirements for qualification as a REIT include various restrictions on common stock ownership and the nature of the assets and sources of income.

Below is a summary of the taxable net income available to common shareholders for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.

Table 14 — Taxable Net Income

(dollars in thousands)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,						For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2004			2003 (A)			2004			2003 (A)
Consolidated net income	$	66,551		$	51,680		$	35,626		$	28,721
Equity in net income of NFI Holding Corp.		(7,335	)		(10,064	)		(7,688	)		(5,197	)

REIT net income		59,216			41,616			27,938			23,524
Adjustments to net income to compute taxable income		40,989			24,888			28,287			17,838

Taxable income before preferred dividends		100,205			66,504			56,225			41,362
Preferred dividends		(2,938	)		—			(1,663	)		—

Estimated taxable income available to common shareholders	$	97,267		$	66,504		$	54,562		$	41,362

Estimated taxable income per common shareholder	$	3.89		$	2.98		$	2.18		$	1.85

(A)	The estimated taxable income in 2003 has been adjusted for our adoption of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” discussed in Note 3.

In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute 90 percent of our taxable income before the due date of our federal tax return, including extensions. Additionally, for the REIT to avoid paying federal income tax, there are two other distribution requirements. First, in order to avoid a 4 percent excise tax, the REIT must generally distribute at least 85 percent of its taxable income (plus undistributed prior year amounts) no later than December 31 of the current year (or no later than 30 days after year end if certain requirements are met). Alternatively, in order to avoid paying an income tax at the REIT level, we must distribute all of our taxable income before the timely filing of our tax return. This second distribution requirement may be met by designating certain dividends paid in the following year as applying to the current year (“spillover dividends”). This spillover dividend rule allows a REIT to pay dividends at regular intervals and amounts and avoid volatility in its dividend policy.

The dividend policy adopted by our Board applies the spillover dividend rules for purposes of managing the REIT distribution requirement and in computing REIT taxable income. This policy better aligns dividends with economic income and allows us to better manage volatility in our dividend payments.

NFI Holding Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NovaStar Financial, Inc., has not elected REIT-status and files a consolidated federal income tax return with its subsidiaries. NFI Holding Corporation reported net income before income taxes of $14.7 million and $14.7 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with $18.4 million and $9.4 million for the same period of 2003. As shown in our statement of income, this resulted in an income tax expense of $7.4 million and $7.0 million for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, compared with $8.3 million and $4.2 million for the same period of 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity means the need for, access to and uses of cash. Our primary needs for cash include the acquisition of mortgage loans, principal repayment and interest on borrowings, operating expenses and dividend payments. Substantial cash is required to support the operating activities of the business, especially the mortgage origination operation. Mortgage asset sales, principal, interest and fees collected on mortgage assets support cash needs. Drawing upon various borrowing arrangements typically satisfies major cash requirements. As shown in Table 5, we have $211.3 million in immediately available funds, including $191.3 million in cash.

Mortgage lending requires significant cash to fund loan originations. Our warehouse lending arrangements, including repurchase agreements, support the mortgage lending operation. Our warehouse mortgage lenders allow us to borrow between 98% and 100% of the outstanding principal. Funding for the difference – generally 2% of the principal - must come from cash on hand.

Loans financed with warehouse and repurchase credit facilities are subject to changing market valuation and margin calls. The market value of our loans is dependent on a variety of economic conditions, including interest rates (and borrower demand) and end investor desire and capacity. Market values have been consistent over the past three years. However, there is no certainty that the prices will remain constant. To the extent the value of the loans declines significantly, we would be required to repay portions of the amounts we have borrowed. The value of our “recourse” loans (classified as held-for-sale) as of June 30, 2004 would need to decline by more than 15% before we would use all immediately available funds, assuming no other constraints on our immediately available funds.

We have no recourse for loans financed with asset-backed bonds and, as such, there is minimal liquidity risk.

The derivative financial instruments we use also subject us to “margin call” risk. Under our interest rate swaps, we pay a fixed rate to the counterparties while they pay us a floating rate. While floating rates are low, on a net basis we are paying the counterparty. In order to mitigate credit exposure to us, the counterparty requires us to post margin deposits with them. As of June 30, 2004, we have approximately $6.4 million on deposit. Further declining interest rates would subject us to additional exposure for cash margin calls. However, the asset side of the balance sheet should increase in value in a further declining interest rate scenario. Incoming cash on our mortgage loans and securities is a principal source of cash. The volume of cash depends on, among other things, interest rates. While short-term interest rates (the basis for our funding costs) are low and the coupon rates on our loans are high, our net interest margin (and therefore incoming cash flow) is high. Severe and immediate changes in interest rates will impact the volume of our incoming cash flow. To the extent rates increase dramatically, our funding costs will increase quickly. While many of our loans are adjustable, they typically will not reset as quickly as our funding costs. This circumstance would temporarily reduce incoming cash flow. As noted above, derivative financial instruments are used to mitigate the effect of interest rate volatility. In this rising rate situation, our interest rate swaps and caps would provide additional cash flows to mitigate the lower cash flows on loans and securities.

Loans we originate can be sold to a third party, which also generates cash to fund on-going operations. When market prices exceed our cost to originate, we believe we can operate in this manner, provided that the level of loan originations is at or near the capacity of the loan production infrastructure.

Cash activity during the six and three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

As noted above, proceeds from equity offerings have supported our operations. Since inception, we have raised $292 million in net proceeds through private and public equity offerings. Equity offerings provide another future liquidity source.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As discussed previously, we pool the loans we originate and securitize them to obtain long-term financing for the assets. The loans are transferred to a trust where they serve as collateral for asset-backed bonds, which the trust issues to the public. Our ability to use the securitization capital market is critical to the operations of our business. Table 3 summarizes our off balance sheet securitizations.

External factors that are reasonably likely to affect our ability to continue to use this arrangement would be those factors that could disrupt the securitization capital market. A disruption in the market could prevent us from being able to sell the securities at a favorable price, or at all. Factors that could disrupt the securitization market include an international liquidity crisis such as occurred in the fall of 1998, a terrorist attack, outbreak of war or other significant event risk, and market specific events such as a default of a comparable type of securitization. If we were unable to access the securitization market, we may still be able to finance our mortgage operations by selling our loans to investors in the whole loan market. We were able to do this following the liquidity crisis in 1998.

Specific items that may affect our ability to use the securitizations to finance our loans relate primarily to the performance of the loans that have been securitized. Extremely poor loan performance may lead to poor bond performance and investor unwillingness to buy bonds supported by our collateral. Our financial performance and condition has little impact on our ability to securitize, as evidenced by our ability to securitize in 1998, 1999 and 2000 when our financial trend was weak.

loans to third parties at June 30, 2004. As of December 31, 2003, we had outstanding commitments to purchase loans of $60 million and no commitments to sell loans to third parties. The commitments to originate and purchase loans do not necessarily represent future cash requirements, as some portion of the commitments are likely to expire without being drawn upon or may be subsequently declined for credit or other reasons.

On June 16, 2004, we executed a securitization transaction accounted for as a sale of loans. We delivered $840.3 million in loans collateralizing NMFT Series 2004-2 (see Note 4 of the consolidated financial statements). On July 1, 2004, we delivered an additional $559.7 million in loans collateralizing NMFT Series 2004-2.

Contractual Obligations

We have entered into certain long-term agreements, which obligate us to make future payments to satisfy the related contractual obligations. The following table summarizes our contractual obligations with regard to our long-term debt and lease agreements as of June 30, 2004.

Table 15 — Contractual Obligations

(in thousands)


	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		4-5 Years		After 5 Years
Short-term borrowings	$	1,512,538	$	1,512,538		—		—		—
Long-term debt (A)	$	191,527	$	144,642	$	26,806	$	11,203	$	8,876
Mortgage loan purchase commitments	$	24,996	$	24,996		—		—		—
Operating leases	$	36,891	$	7,140	$	14,759	$	11,876	$	3,116
Premiums due to counterparties related to interest rate cap agreements	$	2,687	$	1,604	$	1,083		—		—

(A)	Repayment of the asset-backed bonds is dependent upon payment of the underlying mortgage loans, which collateralize the debt. The repayment of these mortgage loans is affected by prepayments.

Inflation

Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are financial in nature. As a result, interest rates and other factors drive company performance far more than does inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and dividends are based on taxable income. In each case, financial activities and the balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost or fair market value without considering inflation.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 describes certain recently issued accounting pronouncements. Also, refer to Note 2 of the condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this document for additional discussion. Management believes the implementation of these pronouncements and others that have gone into effect since the date of these reports will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate/Market Risk

Our investment policy sets the following general goals:

(1)

Maintain the net interest margin between assets and liabilities, and

(2)

Diminish the effect of changes in interest rate levels on our market value

Loan Price Volatility. Under our current mode of operation, we depend heavily on the market for wholesale nonconforming mortgage loans. To conserve capital, we may sell loans we originate. Financial results will depend, in part, on the ability to find purchasers for the loans at prices that cover origination expenses. Exposure to loan price volatility is reduced somewhat as we acquire and retain mortgage loans because our investment portfolio is growing.

Interest Rate Risk. When interest rates on our assets do not adjust at the same rates as our liabilities or when the assets have fixed rates and the liabilities are adjusting, future earnings potential is affected. We express this interest rate risk as the risk that the market value of assets will increase or decrease at different rates than that of the liabilities. Expressed another way, this is the risk that net asset value will experience an adverse change when interest rates change. We assess the risk based on the change in market values given increases and decreases in interest rates. We also assess the risk based on the impact to net income in changing interest rate environments.

Management primarily uses financing sources where the interest rate resets frequently. As of June 30, 2004, borrowings under all financing arrangements adjust daily or monthly. On the other hand, very few of the mortgage assets we own adjust on a monthly or daily basis. Most of the mortgage loans contain features where their rates are fixed for some period of time and then adjust frequently thereafter. For example, one of our loan products is the “2/28” loan. This loan is fixed for its first two years and then adjusts every six months thereafter.

While short-term borrowing rates are low and long-term asset rates are high, this portfolio structure produces good results. However, if short-term interest rates rise rapidly, earning potential is significantly affected, as the asset rate resets would lag the borrowing rate resets.

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis. To assess interest sensitivity as an indication of exposure to interest rate risk, management relies on models of financial information in a variety of interest rate scenarios. Using these models, the fair value and interest rate sensitivity of each financial instrument, or groups of similar instruments is estimated, and then aggregated to form a comprehensive picture of the risk characteristics of the balance sheet. The risks are analyzed on both an income and market value basis. The following are summaries of the analysis.

Table 16 - Interest Rate Sensitivity - Income

(dollars in thousands)


	Basis Point Increase (Decrease) in Interest Rate (A)
	(200) (C)	(100)			100			200
As of June 30, 2004:
Change in net interest income	N/A	$	15,552		$	(13,945	)	$	(28,244	)

Percent change in net interest income from base	N/A		4.1	%		(3.7	)%		(7.5	)%

Percent change of capital (B)	N/A		4.5	%		(4.0	)%		(8.1	)%

As of December 31, 2003:
Change in net interest income	N/A	$	15,546		$	(11,393	)	$	(20,777	)

Percent change in net interest income from base	N/A		5.6	%		(4.1	)%		(7.5	)%

Percent change of capital (B)	N/A		5.2	%		(3.8	)%		(6.9	)%

(A)	Net interest income (income from assets less expense from liabilities and expense from interest rate agreements) in a parallel shift in the yield curve, up and down 1% and 2%.

(B)	Total change in estimated spread income as a percent of total stockholders’ equity as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.

(C)	A decrease in interest rates by 200 basis points (2%) would imply rates on liabilities at or below zero.

Table 17 - Interest Rate Sensitivity - Market Value

(dollars in thousands)


	Basis Point Increase (Decrease) in Interest Rate (A)
	(200) (C)	(100)			100			200
As of June 30, 2004:
Change in market values of:
Assets	N/A	$	58,154		$	(62,140	)	$	(129,311	)
Interest rate agreements	N/A		(34,264	)		35,646			70,838

Cumulative change in market value	N/A	$	23,890		$	(26,494	)	$	(58,473	)

Percent change of market value portfolio equity (B)	N/A		5.4	%		(6.0	)%		(13.1	)%

As of December 31, 2003:
Change in market values of:
Assets	N/A	$	34,499		$	(65,216	)	$	(144,343	)
Interest rate agreements	N/A		(31,250	)		34,073			69,497

Cumulative change in market value	N/A	$	3,249		$	(31,143	)	$	(74,846	)

Percent change of market value portfolio equity (B)	N/A		1.0	%		(9.1	)%		(21.9	)%

(A)	Change in market value of assets or interest rate agreements in a parallel shift in the yield curve, up and down 1% and 2%.

(B)	Total change in estimated market value as a percent of market value portfolio equity as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.

(C)	A decrease in interest rates by 200 basis points (2%) would imply rates on liabilities at or below zero.

The values under the headings “100”, “200”, “(100)” and “(200)” are management’s estimates of the income and change in market value of those same assets, liabilities and interest rate agreements assuming that interest rates were 100 and 200 basis points, or 1 and 2 percent higher and lower. The cumulative change in income or market value represents the change in income or market value of assets, net of the change in income or market value of liabilities and interest rate agreements.

Hedging. In order to address a mismatch of assets and liabilities, the hedging section of the investment policy is followed, as approved by the Board. Specifically, the interest rate risk management program is formulated with the intent to offset the potential adverse effects resulting from rate adjustment limitations on mortgage assets and the differences between interest rate adjustment indices and interest rate adjustment periods of adjustable-rate mortgage loans and related borrowings.

We use interest rate cap and swap contracts to mitigate the risk of the cost of variable rate liabilities increasing at a faster rate than the earnings on assets during a period of rising rates. In this way, management intends generally to hedge as much of the interest rate risk as determined to be in our best interest, given the cost and risk of hedging transactions and the need to maintain REIT status.

We seek to build a balance sheet and undertake an interest rate risk management program that is likely, in management’s view, to enable us to maintain an equity liquidation value sufficient to maintain operations given a variety of potentially adverse circumstances. Accordingly, the hedging program addresses both income preservation, as discussed in the first part of this section, and capital preservation concerns.

Interest rate cap agreements are legal contracts between us and a third party firm or “counterparty”. The counterparty agrees to make payments to us in the future should the one- or three-month LIBOR interest rate rise above the strike rate specified in the contract. We make either quarterly premium payments or have chosen to pay the premiums at the beginning to the counterparties under contract. Each contract has either a fixed or amortizing notional face amount on which the interest is computed, and a set term to maturity. When the referenced LIBOR interest rate rises above the contractual strike rate, we earn cap income. Payments on an annualized basis equal the contractual notional face amount times the difference between actual LIBOR and the strike rate. Interest rate swaps have similar characteristics. However, interest rate swap agreements allow us to pay a fixed rate of interest while receiving a rate that adjusts with one-month LIBOR.

The following table summarizes the key contractual terms associated with our interest rate risk management contracts. Substantially all of the pay-fixed swaps and interest rate caps are indexed to one-month and three-month LIBOR.

We have determined the following estimated net fair value amounts by using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies as of June 30, 2004.

Table 18 - Interest Rate Risk Management Contracts

(dollars in thousands)


	Maturity Range
	Net Fair Value		Total Notional Amount			2004			2005			2006			2007
Pay-fixed swaps:
Contractual maturity	$	3,867	$	1,520,000		$	—		$	285,000		$	985,000		$	250,000
Weighted average pay rate				2.9	%		—			2.4	%		2.8	%		3.5	%
Weighted average receive rate				1.3	%		(A	)		(A	)		(A	)		(A	)

Interest rate caps:
Contractual maturity	$	8,109	$	764,783		$	114,783		$	450,000		$	200,000		$	—
Weighted average strike rate				1.7	%		1.8	%		1.6	%		2.0	%		—

(A)	The pay-fixed swaps receive rate is indexed to one-month and three-month LIBOR.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the federal securities laws, including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the federal securities laws is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) as of the end of the period covered by this report and concluded that the Company’s controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in NovaStar Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, NovaStar Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


	Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (A)
April 1, 2004 – April 30, 2004	—	—	—	$	1,020,082
May 1, 2004 – May 31, 2004	—	—	—	$	1,020,082
June 1, 2004 – June 30, 2004	—	—	—	$	1,020,082

(A)	Current report on Form 8-K was filed on October 2, 2000 announcing that the Board of Directors authorized the company to repurchase its common shares, bringing the total authorization to $9 million.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

(a) The 2004 annual meeting of shareholders of NovaStar Financial, Inc. was held on May 25, 2004.

(b) The following matters were voted on at the annual meeting:


		Vote
		For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-Votes
1.	Election of Directors (term expiring in 2007)
	W. Lance Anderson	23,208,997	—	277,805	1,264,603
	Gregory T. Barmore	23,258,021	—	228,781	1,264,603

		Vote
		For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-Votes

2.	Approval of the NovaStar Financial, Inc. 2004 Incentive Stock Plan	11,201,800	1,019,279	178,784	12,351,542

		Vote

		For	Against	Abstain	Broker Non-Votes
3.	Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as NovaStar Financial, Inc.’s independent public accountants for 2004	23,181,820	207,842	97,140	1,264,603

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)	Exhibit Listing


Exhibit No.		Description of Document
3.1*		Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant

3.3*		Bylaws of the Registrant

3.3a***		Amendment to Bylaws of the Registrant, adopted February 2, 2000

3.4**		Articles Supplementary of the Registrant, adopted January 15, 2004

31.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification - Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Principal Financial Officer Certification - Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Chief Executive Officer Certification - Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2		Principal Financial Officer Certification - Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

*	Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (373-32327) filed by the Registrant with the SEC on July 29 1997, as amended.

**	Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to Form 8-A/A filed by the Registrant with the SEC on January 20, 2004.

***	Incorporated by reference to the correspondingly numbered exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by the Registrant with the SEC on March 20, 2000.

(b)	NovaStar Financial filed the following Form 8-K’s during the three months ended June 30, 2004.

Press Release, dated April 28, 2004 “NovaStar Announces Earnings Increase and Declared Dividend for First Quarter 2004”. Current report on Form 8-K was filed on April 30, 2004.

NOVASTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


NOVASTAR FINANCIAL, INC.

DATE: August 6, 2004		/s/ Scott F. Hartman
		Scott F. Hartman
		Chairman of the Board, Secretary and
		Chief Executive Officer

DATE: August 6, 2004		/s/ Rodney E. Schwatken
		Rodney E. Schwatken
		Vice President, Treasurer and Controller
		(Principal Financial Officer)